Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-10-2004 Planning Commission PacketCITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MINUTES DATE: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 - 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Council Chambers/Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting ROLL CALL: Commissioners Jill Hunter, Susie Nagpal, Linda Rodgers, Michael Schallop, Mike Uhl, Ruchi Zutshi and Chair Mohammad Garakani ABSENT: Commissioners Hunter 8i Uhl STAFF: Planners Oosterhous Est Welsh, Director Sullivan and Minutes Clerk Shinn PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE MINUTES: Draft Minutes from Regular Planning Commission Meeting of October 27, 2004. (APPROVED 4-0-1, SCHALLOP ABSTAINED) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS -Any member of the Public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three minutes on matters not on this agenda The law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Planning Commission may instruct staf f accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Planning Commission direction to Staf f. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on November 4, 2004. REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS If you wish to appeal any decision on this Agenda, you may file an "Appeal Application" with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15-90.050 (b). CONSENT CALENDAR - None PUBLIC HEARINGS All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. Applicants/Appellants and their representatives have a total of ten minutes maximum for opening statements. Members of the Public may comment on any item for up to three minutes. Applicant/Appellants and their representatives have a total of five minutes maximum for closing statements. 1. APPLICATION #04-035 (386-52-029) GALEB, 20423 Seagull Way; -The applicant requests design review approval to construct atwo-story single-family residence. The project includes the demolition of an existing two-story residence. The total floor area of the proposed two-story residence and garage is 3,540 square feet. The floor area of the first floor is 2,299 square feet and the second floor is 1,241 square feet. In addition, a 1,752 square foot basement is proposed. The maximum height of the proposed residence is 25 feet 10 inches. The lot size is 11,250 square feet and the site is zoned R-1 10,000. (CHRISTY OOSTERHOUS) (DENIED 3-2, RODGERS &r SCHALLOP OPPOSE DENIAL) 2. APPLICATION #04-151 (386-35-069) CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION, DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE, 12033 Miller Ave.-The applicant, Church of the Ascension, requests a Sign Permit to construct a seven foot high freestanding, six foot wide x four foot high, illuminated sign along Prospect Avenue. The illuminated sign is proposed to replace the existing wooden sign at the southwest corner of Miller &z Prospect Avenues. (ANN WELSx) (DENIED 5-0) 3. APPLICATIONS #04-128, 129, 130, 131 ~ 132 (389-14-37) SAGARCHI, 13089 Quito Road - The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct five single family homes on the site of the former Dorcich Orchard which was approved for a six lot subdivision on 11/12/03. The proposed homes are designed to be compatible with the style of the historic farmhouse, which is being moved and restored on Lot 5. The homes are two story structures with a maximum height of 25 feet 6 inches. The floor area of the homes range in size from 3,366 square feet to 3,517 square feet. The property is in the R-1, 10,000 zoning district. The subdivision landscaping and Quito Road sound wall are also the subject of review. (ANN WELSH) (APPROVED S-0 LOT 2, LOT 3 &r LOT 4) (LOT 1 AND LOT 6 ARE CONTINUED FOR REDESIGN 5-0) DIRECTORS ITEM Remind Commissioners that the meeting on November 24, 2004 is cancelled. COMMISSION ITEMS - None COMMUNICATIONS WRITTEN - None ADJOURNMENT AT 10:55 PM TO NEXT MEETING - Wednesday, December 8, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers/Civic Theater 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA Incompliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerh at (408) 868-1269 or ctclerh@saratoga.ca.us. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to mahe reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II). Certificate of Posting of Agenda: I, Kristin Borel, Office Specialist for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga was posted on November 4, 2004 at the of fice of the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 and was available for public review at that location. The agenda is also available on the City's website at www.saratoga.ca.us If you would like to receive the Agenda's via a-mail, please send your e-mail address to planning@saratoga.ca.us CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION SITE VISIT AGENDA DATE: Tuesday, November 9, 2004 -12:00 noon PLACE: City Hall Parking Lot, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue TYPE: Site Visit Committee SITE VISITS WILL BE MADE TO THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FOR WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2004 ROLL CAU. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA AGENDA 1. Application #04-035 - GALEB Item 1 20423 Seagull Way 2. Application #04-151 - CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION Item 2 12033 Miller 3. Application #04-(128-132) - SAGARCHI Item 3 13089 Quito Road SITE VISIT COMMITTEE The Site Visit Committee is comprised of interested Planning Commission members. The committee conducts site visits to properties which are new items on the Planning Commission agenda. The site visits are held on the Tuesday preceding the Wednesday hearing, between 12:00 p.m. and 2:00 p.m. It is encouraged for the applicant and/or owner to be present to answer any questions which may arise. Site visits are generally short (5 to 10 minutes) because of time constraints. Any presentations and testimony you may wish to give should be saved for the Public Hearing. • CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA DATE: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 - 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Council Chambers/Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting ROLL CALL: Commissioners Jill Hunter, Susie Nagpal, Linda Rodgers, Michael Schallop, Mike Uhl, Ruchi Zutshi and Chair Mohammad Garakani PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE MINUTES: Draft Minutes from Regular Planning Commission Meeting of October 27, 2004. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS -Any member of the Public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three minutes on matters not on this agenda The law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Planning Commission may instruct staf f accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Planning Commission direction to Staff. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on November 4, 2004. REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS If you wish to appeal any decision on this Agenda, you may file an "Ap eal Application" with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Mu 'cipal Code 15-90.050 (b). CONSENT CALENDAR - None PUBLIC HEARINGS All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. Applicants/Appellants and their representatives have a total of ten minutes maximum for opening statements. Members of the Public may comment on any item for up to three minutes. Applicant/Appellants and their representatives have a total of five minutes maximum for closing statements. 1. APPLICATION #04-035 (386-52-029) GALEB, 20423 Seagull Way; -The applicant requests design review approval to construct atwo-story single-family residence. The project includes the demolition of an existing two-story residence. The total floor area of the proposed two-story residence and garage is 3,540 square feet. The floor area of the first floor is 2,299 square feet and the second floor is 1,241 square feet. In addition, a 1,752 square foot basement is proposed. The maximum height of the proposed residence is 25 feet 10 inches. The lot size is 11,250 square feet and the site is zoned R-110,000. (CHRISTY OOSTERHOUS) • 2. APPLICATION #04-151 (386-35-069) CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION, DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE, 12033 Miller Ave.-The applicant, Church of the Ascension, requests a Sign Permit to construct a seven foot high freestanding, six foot wide x four foot high, illuminated sign along Prospect Avenue. The illuminated sign is proposed to replace the existing wooden sign at the southwest corner of Miller ~ Prospect Avenues. (ANN WELSH) 3. APPLICATIONS #04-128, 129, 130, 131 ~ 132 (389-14-37) SAGARCHI, 13089 Quito Road - The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct five single family homes on the site of the former Dorcich Orchard which was approved for a six lot subdivision on 11/12/03. The proposed homes are designed to be compatible with the style of the historic farmhouse, which is being moved and restored on Lot 5. The homes are two story structures with a maximum height of 25 feet 6 inches. The floor area of the homes range in size from 3,366 square feet to 3,517 square feet. The property is in the R-l, 10,000 zoning district. The subdivision landscaping and Quito Road sound wall are also the subject of review. (ANN WELSH) DIRECTORS ITEM - Remind Commissioners that the meeting on November 24, 2004 is cancelled. COMMISSION ITEMS - None COMMUNICATIONS WRITTEN - None ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING - Wednesday, December 8, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers/Civic Theater 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA Incompliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (408) 868-1269 or ctclerh@saratoga.ca.us. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the Ciry to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II). Certificateof Postingof Agenda: I, Kristin Borel, Office Specialist for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga was posted on November 4, 2004 at the of fice of the City of Saratoga,13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 and was available for public review at that location. The agenda is also available on the City's website at www.saratoga.ca.us If you would like to receive the Agenda's via e-mail, please send your e-mail address to planning@sarato ag ca.us 0 ~ ~ MINUTES /~ SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION ~/'~'~ DATE: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 PLACE: Council Chambers/Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Sazatoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting Chair Gazakani called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Garakani, Hunter, Nagpal, Rodgers and Zutshi Absent: Commissioners Schallop and Uhl Staff: Director Tom Sullivan, Associate Planner John Livingstone and Associate Planner Ann Welsh PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regulaz Meeting of October 13, 20 4. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Hunter, seconde by Commissioner Nagpal, the Planning Commission minutes of the regular me ting of October 13, 2004, were adopted with corrections to pages 5,6,7 and 17. ( 0-0-2; Commissioners Schallop and Uhl were absent) ORAL COMMUNICATION There were no oral communications. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA Director Tom Sullivan announced that, pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on October 21, 2004. REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS Director Tom Sullivan announced that appeals are possible for any decision made on this Agenda by filing an Appeal Application with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendaz days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15.90.050(b). Associate Planner John Livingstone advised that the appeal time frame for the Use Permit is 10 calendar days. CONSENT CALENDAR There were no Consent Calendar Items. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of October 27, 2004 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING -ITEM NO.1 *** APPLICATION #04-112 (397-24-032) WOOD, 14161 Douglas Lane: The applicant requests Design Review Approval to construct atwo-story single-family residence. The total floor area of the proposed residence is 5,907.5 square feet. The floor area of the first floor and the garage is 4,575.5 square feet and the second floor is 1,332 square feet. The maximum height of the proposed residence is 24 feet 6 inches. The lot size is approximately 20,080 square feet and the site is zoned R-1-20,000. (CHRISTY OOSTRHOUS) (Continued from the meeting held on October l3, 2004) Director Tom Sullivan advised that the applicant was withdrawing the request for atwo-story residence and would be resubmitting cone-story design in its place. Motion: The Planning Commission tabled consideration of Application #04-112. (5-0-2) *** PUBLIC HEARING -ITEM N0.2 APPLICATION #04-265 (403-24-034) WORDEN "Union 76", 14395 Bia Basin Way: Request for Conditional Use Permit approval to expand the existing retail food market by 70 square feet. The site is located in a Commercial Zoning District. (JOHN LIVINGSTONE) Associate Planner John Livingstone presented the staff report as follows: • Advised that the applicant is seeking approval fora 70 square foot addition to an existing food mart at the Union 76 Station at 14395 Big Basin Way. The expansion would accommodate additional food sales such as yogurt and ice tea. • Added that the expansion would be within the existing rooflines and all materials will match existing. • Explained that this expansion requires a Use Permit. The original Use Permit for this service station was approved in 1997. Tonight's action would modify that Use Permit. • Reported that the site meets the parking requirements of 9 spaces, exceed by one at 10 spaces. Staff surveyed the parking and found it to be adequate. • Stated that the operational hours would remain the same, 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., Mondays through Fridays, and from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays. • Stated that no negative correspondence was received and that 28 surrounding neighbors signed a neighbor notification form. No concerns were raised. No adverse feedback was received. • Informed that this proposal meets the required findings for granting of a Conditional Use Permit. • Recommended approval and advised that the applicant is present and available for questions. Chair Garakani asked staff what triggers brought this item before the Planning Commission. Planner John Livingstone replied that the requirement for a Use Permit in order to approve this request was the trigger. Commissioner Hunter asked staff to explain the difference between the terms Use Permit and Conditional Use Permit. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of October 27, 2004 Page 3 Director Tom Sullivan replied that the terms are synonymous. Planner John Livingstone added that the more formal term used in the Code is Conditional Use Permit. Chair Garakani opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 2. Mr. Eber Jaques, Applicant's Representative: • Explained that this is a small expansion within an existing footprint to better serve existing customers. Commissioner Nagpal asked for verification that no soil excavation activities would occur on this site as part of this request. Mr. Eber Jaques replied none whatsoever. Chair Garakani closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 2. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Nagpal, seconded by Commissioner Rodgers, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit (Application #04-265) to allow the expansion of an existing retail food market by 70 square feet at the Union 76 Station located at 14395 Big Basin Way, by the ,following roll call vote: AYES: Garakani, Hunter, Nagpal, Rodgers and Zutshi NOES: None ABSENT: Schallop and Uhl ABSTAIN: None *** PUBLIC HEARING -ITEM N0.3 APPLICATION #03-218 (503-13-067) W1I.LIAM WAI YAN HO, Mount Eden Road, south of Villa Oaks Lane: The applicant proposes to subdivide a 29.28 acre property into five clustered lots with an average lot size of 1.73 acres. The remaining 19.49-acre portion of the property is to remain in open space with a pedestrian, equestrian trail winding through the open space. Access to the property is to be via a cul-de-sac, which egresses onto Mount Eden Road. An emergency access road is proposed from Vista Regina Road to the cul-de-sac. The property has a general plan designation of RHS, Hillside Conservation and is zoned HR -Hillside Residential District. (ANN WELSH) Associate Planner Ann Welsh presented the staff report as follows: • Reminded that this proposal had been before the Commission on April 28, 2004 and subsequently during a Study Session held on August 25, 2004. At the April hearing, the Commission suggested that the applicant provide additional environmental documentation. • Explained that the proposal is to subdivide a 29.28-acre property into five cluster lots with the rest • of the property to remain open space. • Stated that access to the site would be via a cul-de-sac from Mount Eden Road. • Said that the lots would range between one and three acres. Sazatoga Planning Commission Minutes of October 27, 2004 Page 4 • Explained that the property is steeply sloped and includes a Riparian corridor within the proposed open space azea. There is no public access. Access would be via an easement. • Stated that condition required to support the concept of cluster homes with corresponding open space is that the clustering of residential lots would result in an equal or greater azea of land being left as open space. Clustering must reduce the gross developed azea. No single lot may be less than 20,000 square feet. The smallest in this proposal is 43,000 squaze feet. Additionally, the total number of lots cannot exceed the number derived from the formula regarding slope. No unit would exceed 7,800 squaze feet in azea. The cluster concept results in a greater azea of natural terrain. • Provided the requirements to deny such a request to cluster the homes. The Commission would need to make findings including that the Tentative Map is not consistent with the General Plan or Specific Plan(s) or that the clustering conflicts with easements. • Reported that this project received geotechnical approval and that the Traffic Consultant's recommendations regadding safety have been addressed. The applicant would have to conduct a field study prior to construction. • Said that staff has reviewed the proposal and found that the required findings to support this request can be made. Commissioner Zutshi asked if the open space would be dedicated. Planner Ann Welsh replied that yes, in order to be able to cluster the residential lots, the applicant would be required to dedicate the open space area as public open space. However, she added that staff is not yet sure if the City is prepazed to accept this dedication as public open space but the City will accept the dedication of the trail. r Rod ers asked about the in-lieu fees. Commissione g Planner Ann Welsh said that the in-lieu fees aze imposed on a per-lot basis. With this project there would be four new building lots. The in-lieu fee is approximately $20,000 per lot. If the open space were to be dedicated, the applicant would not be required to pay this fee, which is collected by the Public Works Department. Commissioner Rodgers asked for clarification as to whether the in-lieu fee would have to be paid if the land is dedicated. Director Tom Sullivan said that the applicant has offered to dedicate the open space. The decision on whether or not to accept the open space dedication would be made by Council at the time of approval of Final Map. It is likely that Council would reject the dedication and require that the in-lieu fees be paid as well as accept the Trail easement. Chair Garakani asked if the fee is paid at that time. Director Tom Sullivan said that the fee is simply levied at that time. Commissioner Nagpal asked if the open space would be maintained in perpetuity. Planner Ann Welsh said that the open space is likely to be private/public open space with an access easement. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of October 27, 2004 Page 5 Commissioner Hunter pointed out the many letters received a couple of years ago and asked if the concerns raised at that time have been resolved. Planner Ann Welsh said that she has worked with neighbors for approximately the last three years and that a number of issues are addressed with the conditions in the Resolution. Commissioner Hunter asked about the drainage problems raised. Planner Ann Welsh advised that the applicant would have to address any drainage issues to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Water cannot be drained off-site but rather must be managed on site. Commissioner Hunter asked what the benefit is between the cluster concept versus allowing the homes to be spread throughout the 29 acres. Planner Ann Welsh pointed out that if the property were to be chopped into five parcels the wildlife corridor would not be the same as there would be more disturbances. Additionally, some of the land is not appropriate for development. Commissioner Hunter questioned the need for security gates. Planner Ann Welsh said that the City does not have a policy prohibiting gates. Consideration by the Commission on the issue of gates is not to solve a traffic problem but more of a social question. Chair Garakani asked if the gates would affect the trail. Planner Ann Welsh replied no, only cars and not horses or people. Commissioner Nagpal complimented and thanked Planner Ann Welsh for her complete report, saying that it is easy to go through the points made by the Commission. Commissioner Hunter stated that it was important for the community to know that all letters submitted on this project were provided to the Commission. Chair Garakani opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 3. Mr. Maurice Abraham, Applicant's Representative: • Said that he has very little to add to the earlier testimony but wanted to recap a couple of points. • Reminded that there has already been one public hearing as well as a productive Study Session. • Stated that issues have since been satisfactorily addressed. • Reported that they had met individually with several neighbors and resolved most concerns raised, making a number of revisions and refinements to their proposal. This project has a better plan as a result and the project is good for the community. It is well thought out and would be developed at well below the allowable density while providing open space and distance between surrounding existing homes. • Stated that they are anxious to move forward and asked the Commission's support by approving this request tonight. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of October 27, 2004 Page 6 Commissioner Zutshi asked Mr. Maurice Abraham if he has looked at the community concerns and feels that they have been resolved. Mr. Maurice Abraham replied yes. The concerns have been resolved except for the Marinero's. Commissioner Hunter reminded that one concern raised was the prospect of having houses visible at or above the ridgeline. Mr. Maurice Abraham said that they moved the road above and pushed the houses further down from the ridge. This also hides the road from view while it is on the ridge. The elevations would be below the ridge. Commissioner Hunter asked Mr. Maurice Abraham for the reasoning behind the gates. Mr. Maurice Abraham replied that the gates were something that Mr. Ho wanted albeit not essential to the project. Chair Garakani asked staff to confirm that the only issue under consideration tonight is the subdivision. Director Tom Sullivan replied correct. Commissioner Nagpal: • Pointed out that there are limitations on where houses can be placed on this property. • Expressed appreciation for the biotech evaluation done. • Stated that she shared the concerns regarding the proposed security gates. • Questioned whether not having the gates might assist with the flow of traffic and whether the transportation consultant considered that issue. Mr. Maurice Abraham reported that they do not have a project traffic consultant. The City's consultant would have to make that determination. Commissioner Hunter questioned if the road width is 20 feet wide. Mr. Maurice Abraham replied that it is 24 feet wide. Ms. Hazel Marinero, 22501 Mount Eden Road, Saratoga: • Said that she resides across the road from the proposed access to this project site. • Reminded that she had previously summarized her concerns in written form. • Explained that this is a fairly dangerous corner and that her main concern is that this project would worsen an already bad situation. • Reported that at the last hearing, they were told that further traffic studies would be done. • Complained that when she attempted to reach Ann Welsh her calls were not returned. • Stated her belief that this project would make a bad situation even worse. • Suggested that the access to the site be placed somewhere else. Planner Ann Welsh: Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of October 27, 2004 Page 7 • Reminded that the driveway configuration did change to lessen the impacts on the neighbors. It is now a divided road and a median has been added. The revised driveway has the egress further up the road from the ingress. The gate was moved back per the recommendation of the City's Traffic Engineer. • Expressed her understanding that the applicant was going to discuss these revisions directly with the Marinero's. • Stated that a condition has also been added, and the applicant had agreed, to put in additional landscaping on the Marinero's property to help mitigate any headline glare. • Stated that the applicant has tried his best to address the concerns raised by the Marinero's but they have to have access to their property. Mr. Ernest Marinero, 22501 Mount Eden Road, Sazatoga: • Stated that he had raised concerns regazding safety at previous meetings. • Said that it had been promised that alternatives for the driveway would be considered, that additional traffic studies would be done and that they would be able to participate in the process. However, three attempts to reach Ann Welsh resulted in no calls back. Nothing has happened. • Asked that the Commission abide by those promises. Commissioner Nagpal asked if the August Study Session was noticed. Planner Ann Welsh replied that the meeting was advertised and posted but that no letters were sent. Mr. Jack Daly, 21931 Via Regina, Saratoga: • Thanked the Commission and Planner Ann Welsh. • Said he resides directly across from this proposed development nd that most of his concerns have been dealt with. • Expressed the concern that the proposed 7,000 square foot homes are lazge for the azea and that he would prefer to see the house sizes scaled down. Chair Garakani advised Mr. Daly that the subdivision is the issue this evening. The homes themselves would be reviewed one by one. This type of concern can be considered during Design Review. Ms. Sheila Daly, 21931 Via Regina, Sazatoga: • Said that they would be looking at Lots 1, 2 and 3 from their home. • Expressed appreciation for the work done and joked that they had come to think of this property as being theirs over the last 20 yeazs. • Pointed out that there aze no other security gates in the area and reported that Mr. Ho is concerned about the potential for vehicles pulling horse trailers using this driveway. She advised that she has never seen one pazked on the corner on that street. • Stated her assumption that this would be a private street. • Reported that since Mr. Ho purchased the property no fire trail abatement has been done. • Suggested that a requirement for such fire trail abatement be included in the CC&Rs. • Said that the weeds get as high as her shoulder and she is five foot, nine inches tall. • Expressed her concern that the rooflines are kept below the ridge. • Questioned how the access to the open space would be accomplished, would it be directly from Via Regina? Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of October 27, 2004 Page 8 Chair Garakani renunded that the roofline issue would be discussed during Design Review but that access and fire prevention clearing can be dealt with this evening. Mr. Brad Baker, 13991 Vista Regina, Saratoga: • Stated that he has no complaints. • Said that this project is well thought out and he is excited to see this. • Stated that the concept of clustering homes is a good one. Mr. Maurice Abraham, Project Representative: • Said that he spoke with Mr. Ho about the issue of fire protection weed abatement. Mr. Ho advised him that it had been done. The weeds were disked in a 30-foot wide swath around the perimeter. • Added that Mr. Ho is fine about allowing access to the trails. Chair Garakani asked if access would be permitted from Vista Regina. Mr. Maurice Abraham replied yes. Chair Garakani asked Mr. Maurice Abraham about the security gate. Mr. Maurice Abraham said that they are open to not having the security gate if that is the pleasure of the Planning Commission and the community. Chair Garakani asked Mr. Maurice Abraham to discuss the road safety issues raised. ham said that the have made the intersection as safe as it could be, short of not Mr. Maunce Abra y having it there at all. Reminded that with changes made, they have saved another Eucalyptus and have offered additional landscaping to deflect any headlights from view by the Marinero property. Chair Garakani closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 3. Commissioner Hunter: • Pointed out that new subdivisions are hard for existing communities to accept. • Stated that five new homes are coming into a pristine area and it is very difficult for people to see that kind of change. • Said that she was moved by the letters received and the concern raised for the safety of wildlife. • Expressed her hope that fencing would not be excessive on this development. • Stated that very hard work has been done on this project both by the City and Mr. Ho. • Declared that the entrance is as it must be and suggested that the gate was not needed. Rather a sign can be posted saying "no horse trailers." This is not a gated area. Commissioner Zutshi: • Agreed that Mr. Ho and his team put a lot of effort and expertise into coming up with this plan. • Pointed out that environmental studies and two traffic studies were prepared. • Said she is satisfied with the proposal and does not feel the gate is an issue either way. Chair Garakani asked Commissioner Zutshi about the concerns of the across the street neighbors. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of October 27, 2004 Page 9 Commissioner Zutshi said that Mr. Ho needs to meet the concerns and agreed that people do drive fast. Suggested having the City install bumps and/or signs. Director Tom Sullivan pointed out that this is a County road and not a City road. Commissioner Nagpal: • Said that there aze concerns with hillside development in general. • Agreed that the various experts have done a good job. • Stated that cluster development is intended for property like this. • Reminded that the Design Review process would occur at a future date. • Said that she feels strongly that the gate is not conducive to this azea. • Agreed that there aze safety concerns and said that she travels this road twice a week to take her children to horseback riding. • Expressed her empathy for that concern over safety. • Stated that the separated driveway entrance and exit mitigates that concern. • Said she is inclined to support this proposal with the exception of the gate. Commissioner Rodgers: • Said that this is a beautiful piece of land and that she understands why the neighbors would hate to see it developed. • Pointed out that this project has been designed to achieve the most open space. • Stated that she supports the cluster-zoning concept. • Said that it would be important to ensure that the new neighbors appreciate this rural neighborhood. • Stressed the importance of requiring fire prevention weed abatement and fencing limitations. • Said that she did not like the security gate at all as it is not in chazacter with the neighborhood and would represent a jarring contrast to the rural azea. Planner Ann Welsh reminded that the Hillside Zoning District prohibits enclosing more than 4,000 squaze feet per pazcel. Therefore, fencing should not be an issue. Commissioner Hunter pointed out that sometimes fencing is put in illegally. Commissioner Rodgers added that there might be more impact if the restrictions are reiterated in the CC&Rs. Chair Garakani: • Said that it appears there is consensus on the issue of the security gate and the applicant is willing to remove it. • Said that access to the site has been dealt with and that the area proposed for access is the only viable access point for this property. • Reminded that the applicant is willing to install screening landscaping to prevent light from imposing on the Marinero property. Commissioner Hunter asked staff to verify the width of the road. Planner Ann Welsh replied 24 feet paved. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of October 27, 2004 Page 10 Commissioner Hunter asked why it was so wide. Planner Ann Welsh replied that this is the standard to allow the Fire Department emergency access. Commissioner Hunter said that it would be important to encourage native landscaping when the individual Design Review applications come forward. Director Tom Sullivan said that a notation to that effect could be crafted for the CC&Rs, reading, "all landscape schemes shall rely on native plant species." Chair Garakani reminded that one concern was raised about mature tree heights being below the ridgeline. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Hunter, seconded by Commissioner Nagpal, the Planning Commission recommended approval of a subdivision (Application #03- 218) of 29.28 acres located on Mount Eden Road, south of Villa Oaks Road, into five cluster lots with a 19.49-acre portion to remain open space with the added requirements: • That landscaping be predominately native and that the CC&Rs reflect that requirement as well as requirements for fencing and grading limitations per the Hillside Residential Zoning District requirements; • That fire prevention weed abatement be performed annually; and • That the security gate be removed from the project, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Garakani, Hunter, Nagpal, Rodgers nd Zutshi NOES: None ABSENT: Schallop and Uhl ABSTAIN: None *** PUBLIC HEARING -ITEM N0.4 APPLICATION #04-052 (386-14-011) CINGULAR WIRELESS/PRINCE OF PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH, 12770 Saratoga Avenue: The applicant is requesting a Use Permit to construct an antenna site on the rear of the grounds of Prince of Peace Church. The proposal is to install a 60-foot high artificial conifer tree in a stand of existing conifers. The artificial tree limbs would camouflage six panel antennas, which are 51 inches high by 13 inches wide. At the base of the artificial tree, four equipment cabinets are proposed, which would be five feet high and painted dark green in order to blend into the existing vegetation. (ANN WELSH) Associate Planner Ann Welsh presented the staff report as follows: • Advised that Cingular Wireless is seeking approval fora 60-foot high artificial Redwood tree at the Prince of Peach Church. In addition to the tree, there would be four equipment cabinets. • Reminded that the FCC has jurisdiction over RF levels while the City's jurisdiction includes consideration of the aesthetics of an antenna installation. • Said that this installation has been certified as being in compliance with FCC standards. • Reported that this installation also serves a public benefit in that it results in income to anon-profit organization (church). Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of October 27, 2004 Page 11 • Stated that an exception to height limitations exists in the zoning to accommodate utility poles. • Said that the conditions have been met and the applicant is available for questions. Commissioner Hunter asked staff if there are any other tree antennas in Saratoga. Planner Ann Welsh replied no. She reported that she went to Palo Alto to see one there. She found a very straight Redwood tree. It didn't jump out at her and was not jarring at all nor was the tree industrial in appearance. Commissioner Hunter asked what occurs if the trees surrounding the tree antenna grow taller. Planner Ann Welsh replied that this might take 20 years to occur. In the event that it did, trees might have to be trimmed to allow reception to occur. Director Tom Sullivan reported that south on Highway 101, both generations of tree antennas exist. It is obvious that improvements have been made in their appearance. Commissioner Nagpal asked if the applicant had looked at alternate locations and/or considered co- locating with an existing provider. Commissioner Nagpal asked staff if there is a list of antenna site locations in the City. Planner Ann Welsh replied no. Chair Garakani opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 4. Mr. Luke Stamos, Ruth & Going, Applicant's Representative: • Said that his company has represented Cingular since 1996. • Said that they are prepared to comply with the conditions. • Advised that they have to go into residential areas in order to achieve adequate service coverage. • Reminded that all cell sites now have GPS systems, which provide a benefit in helping to locate people in distress who are calling for emergency assistance by cell phone. • Stated that it is extremely important to serve the community and there is a need for this particular location. They need the proposed height because of the existing trees. • Said that to match the existing trees, they will take digital photographs and send actual tree limbs to the manufacturer in order to best match the grove of trees in which this tree antenna will be placed. The tree antenna will have bark, texture and fit within this existing grove of Redwood trees. • Assured that the tree antenna would not interfere with any other radio, television or any other type of transmission. Commissioner Rodgers asked how this tree antenna would be maintained. Mr. Luke Stamos replied by using a cherry picker. Commissioner Nagpal asked Mr. Luke Stamos if he had reviewed surrounding sites to consider co- location. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of October 27, 2004 Page 12 Mr. Luke Stamos replied yes. He said it is very difficult when going into residential neighborhoods. Additionally, churches appreciate the revenue earned by having an antenna on their property. Commissioner Hunter asked how much is paid. Mr. Luke Stamos was reluctant to cite specifics since they have competitors. Mr. Jeff Johnson, 18765 Westview Drive, Sazatoga: • Stated that his family resides neazby in the Sazatoga Woods Neighborhood, across the street from the church. • Said he is here on behalf of himself and his family. • Expressed his strong support for this application as cellulaz phone coverage is bad from their home. • Stated that this installation will solve the poor reception problem and help foster competition to offer them multiple choices in cellular providers. Chair Gazakani read an email from Ms. Marilyn Porter, 18117 Sazatoga Park Circle, who expressed her opposition to this application due to safety concerns. Chair Gazakani reminded that safety concerns aze not under the purview of the Planning Commission. Mr. Luke Stamos said that the RF report has been provided and that standing near a microwave is easily ten times worse than emissions from any cellulaz antenna installation. Chair Gazakani closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 4. Commissioner Zutshi said that the Commission has Ann's word on its beauty. Planner Ann Welsh demurred, simply saying that it is unobtrusive. Commissioner Hunter said that she couldn't wait to see it. It is about time to have one in the community. Commissioner Rodgers said that cellulaz coverage is a problem for many in Sazatoga and this site will serve the community well. Agreed that she to could not wait to see it in place. Chair Garakani joked that it is just because the Commissioners aze all tree lovers. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Rodgers, seconded by Commissioner Zutshi, the Planning Commission granted a Conditional Use Permit (Application #04-052) to allow the construction of an antenna site on the rear of the grounds of Prince of Peace Church, 12770 Saratoga Avenue, with a 60-foot high artificial conifer tree, six panel antennas and four equipment cabinets, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Garakani, Hunter, Nagpal, Rodgers and Zutshi NOES: None ABSENT: Schallop and Uhl ABSTAIN: .None *** Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of October 27, 2004 Page 13 DIRECTOR'S ITEMS Director Tom Sullivan advised that the City Manager's Office is coordinating the Annual Commissioners Training for November 15`k' from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. Topics will be the same as last year and include Brown Act and Open Meeting Laws. He encouraged all Commissioners to RSVP to the City Manager's Office. COMMISSION ITEMS Commissioner Nagpal suggested that a list of cellular antenna locations be prepared and that co- locations be encouraged, perhaps even on City-owned property. Perhaps a City policy needs to be developed. Director Tom said that preparing a list of existing locations is fine. However, he wants to keep lease issues on City-owned property out of the jurisdiction of Planning staff to prevent any potential conflicts of interest. Commissioner Nagpal said she would just encourage co-locations when possible. COMMUNICATIONS Written • City Council Minutes from Special Meeting on September 30, 20 4. AD TOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING Upon motion of Commissioner Hunter, seconded by Commissioner Zutshi, Chair Garakani adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m. to the next Regular Planning Commission meeting of November 10, 2004, at 7:00 p.m. MINUTES PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY: Corinne A. Shinn, Minutes Clerk r~ Item 1 C7 • REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No./Location: Type of Application: Owner/Applicant: Staff Planner: Date: APN: 04-035/ 20423 Seagull Way Design Review Tomo and Dara Galeb, Property Owner Lynne Birch Bryan, Architect Christy Oosterhous AICP, Associate Planner November 10, 2004 386-52-029 Department Head: ~.. ~` /.I ~ 1 ~ `~ l._ .~ I ~1 ~r-^ L.. -L T Z ' ~ ~ ~ ,, ~ ~_" i _; ~ __ r ,,: ~ ... ~~ _..__ ~,; ~ ~~ ~~ ~R , .~~ ~~ I~ , ~' ~ ~ ~ ' `~ may' o!~wf `_','` f~, ~_1. ~ ~ ~~ ~.~ ., I ~ i t ~MI~OC~~T-: A _~ 'p ` ~ ~) I Cy1A i ~` ~ i~` ~ r ~ ~. I ~ _ VV ., µ - , ,, L ' -__ ~ J ! ~ ;>" \ I . ~ r N ngrt ................. ~........., • Ma: ~ ~ t„ ~w,s 1250 H ~` ~ 4"':C'"' ~ / ,: ~ ~~ ~\ ~. . -: ~J ~~ ~~: ~ ~. ~`~.. `. ;_.u~' I 20423 Seagull Way `:_e~~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY Application filed: 02/24/04 Application complete: 10/15/04 Notice published: 10/27/04 Mailing completed: 10/25/04 Posting completed: 11/04/04 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: • The applicant requests design review approval to construct atwo-story single-family residence. The project includes the demolition of an existing two-story residence. The total floor area of the proposed two-story residence and garage is 3,540 square feet. The floor area of the first floor is 2,299 square feet and the second floor is 1,241 square feet. In addition, a 1,752 square foot basement is proposed. The maximum height of the proposed residence is 25 feet 10 inches. The lot size is 11,250 square feet and the site is zoned R-1 10,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the applic tion for Design Review. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution of Approval. 2. Neighbor Notification templates. 3. Affidavit of mailing notices and mailing labels for project notification. 4. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A." • x(30®~2 Application No. 04-035,• 20423 Seagull Way • STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R-1-10,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: M-10,000 (Residential Medium Density) 4.35 Max Dwelling Units per Acre MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE: 11,250 square feet SLOPE: level GRADING REQUIRED: Not applicable ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed project including the construction of a new single-family residence is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-family residences. • MATERIALS AND COLORS: Materials and colors include an oyster stucco exterior with concrete terra cotta roof the materials. Stone veneer is proposed along the base of the facade of the residence. .7 a0p~~3 Application No. 04-035; 20423 Seagull Way PROJECT DATA: Proposal Code Requirements Lot Coverage: Residence 2,299 sq. ft. Maximum Allowable 60% Driveway 1,744 sq. ft. Patios, walks, and pools TOTAL 4,043 sq. ft. 6,750 sq. ft. Floor Area: First floor 1,795 sq. ft. Maximum Allowable Gazage 455 sq. ft. Porch 49 sq. ft. Total First Floor 2,299 sq. ft. Second Floor 1,241 sq. ft. (basement) 1,752 sq. ft. TOTAL 3,540 sq. ft. 3,540 sq. ft. Minimum Requirement Setbacks: Front 25 ft. 25 ft. Reaz 1 S` story 70 ft. 25 ft. 2"a story 70 ft. 35 ft. Left Side (West) 1 S` story 7 ft. 6 inches 7 ft. 6 inches 2"a story 17 ft. 12 ft. 6 inches Right Side (East) 1 S` story 12 ft. 7 inches 7 ft. 6 inches 2"a story 12 ft. 7 inches 12 ft. 6 inches Height: Maximum Allowable 25 ft. 10 inches 26 ft. Average grade in feet 416.71 ft. At the topmost point of 442.54 ft. the structure •i •i •i Q~~~ Application No. 04-035; 20423 Seagull Way PROJECT DISCUSSION The applicant requests design review approval to construct atwo-story single-family residence. The project includes the demolition of an existing two-story residence. The total floor azea of the proposed two-story residence and gazage is 3,540 squaze feet. The floor azea of the first floor is 2,299 square feet and the second floor is 1,241 square feet. In addition, a 1,752 squaze foot basement is proposed. The maximum height of the proposed residence is 25 feet 10 inches. The lot size is 11,250 square feet and the site is zoned R-1 10,000. The footprint of the proposed residence is located predominately in the footprint of the existing residence. The home is articulated with varying rooflines and moldings. The home is well-proportioned and not much different form the newer homes that have been built in the vicinity. The homes on Seagull Way aze a mixture of one and two-story structures in various architectural styles. Most of the recently built homes in the azea aze built in a Mediterranean or contemporary style with stucco exteriors, including the neighboring one story home. This home will be very similaz in style to many of the other new homes built in area. Neighbor Correspondence The applicant has provided the neighbor notification templates for the adjacent residential properties. The reaz property line is shazed with an existing commercial building. Staff received comments from the neighbor to the right, Weizhong Kevin Wang. In summary, Mr. Wang requested landscape screening for privacy in his backyazd. Unlike other Sazatoga neighborhoods, the homes in the vicinity of Seagull Way are situated close together. To avoid unreasonable interference with the privacy of the adjacent neighbor to the east, staff has required that the applicant plant screening trees in the backyard along the perimeter of the east side property line to mitigate any impacts on privacy to the adjacent one-story home. The applicant proposed twelve Italian Cypress trees spaced 6 feet apart. Staff has conditioned the project that twelve 24-inch box Italian Cypress trees be spaced 6 feet apart. For reference, the average 24-inch box Italian Cypress is 8 feet in height and grows approximately two feet a yeaz. The trees shall be irrigated with a drip or soaker system. The neighbor notification templates aze attachment 2 of this report. Trees No trees are proposed for removal and City Arborist review was not required for this project. The only potential ordinance sized trees, are approximately eight fruit trees located in the rear yazd. These fruit trees are sepazated from the building site by an existing fence. • To protect the fruit trees, as a condition of approval, the existing fencing is to remain throughout construction. ~~~~ Application No. 04-035,• 20423 Seagull Way Geotechnical Clearance i The application, which includes a basement, requires geotechnical review. Geotechnical Clearance was granted with conditions. The geotechnical conditions have been incorporated in the attached Resolution. Design Review Findings The proposed project is consistent with all the following Design Review findings stated in MCS 15-45.080: (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The footprint of the proposed residence is located predominately in the footprint of the existing residence. Unlike other Sazatoga neighborhoods, the homes in the vicinity of Seagull Way are situated close together. To avoid unreasonable interference with the privacy of the adjacent neighbor to the east, staff has required that the applicant plant screening trees in the backyazd along the perimeter of the east side property line to mitigate any impacts on privacy to the adjacent one-story home. The applicant proposed twelve Italian Cypress trees spaced 6 feet apart. ' Staff has conditioned the project that twelve 24-inch ox Italian Cypress trees be spaced 6 feet apart. For reference, the average 24-inch ox Italian Cypress is 8 feet in height and grows approximately two feet a year. The trees shall be irrigated with a drip or soaker system. The neighbor notification templates aze attachment 2 of this report. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. The proposed residence is not located in a rural azea of the City. It is adjacent to commercially zoned property in medium density zoning. The existing landscape will be relatively unchanged as a new two story residence will replace and existing two story residence. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. City Arborist review was not required. The only potential ordinance sized trees, aze approximately eight fruit trees located in the reaz yard. These fiuit trees aze sepazated from the building site by an existing fence. To protect the fruit trees, as a condition of approval, the existing fencing is to remain throughout construction. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulk The second-story building lines are setback from the first-story. Second-story building lines are softened by rooflines from the first-story. The entry way is proportional to the residence. Architectural details such as stone accents on the entryway, chimney, and facade create • azchitectural interest, and reduce mass and bulk. ~~0~~ Application No. 04-035,• 20423 Seagrill Way i (e) Compatible bulk and height. The home is articulated with varying rooflines and moldings. The home is well-proportioned and not much different form the newer homes that have been built in the vicinity. The proposed residence will be in keeping with the general appearance of the site and neighborhood. (f) Current grading and erosion control methods. The proposal would conform to the City's current grading and erosion control methods. (g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to all of .the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above and staffreport. Conclusion Staff concludes that the Design Review findings can be supported. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the application for Design Review with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached esolution. • ~~0~~~ Attachment 1 • ~~~~s • APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. Application No. 04-035 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Galeb; 20423 Seagull Way WHEREAS, the City of Sazatoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review to construct atwo-story single-family residence. The project includes the demolition of an existing two-story residence. The total floor azea of the proposed two-story residence and gazage is 3,540 square feet; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heazd and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, the project, which proposes to construct additions to a single family residence, is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15303 of the Guidelines for the Implementation of CEQA. This Class 3 exemption applies to construction of a single family home in an urbanized azea; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for design review approval, and the following findings specified in Municipal Code Section 15-45.080 and the City's Residential Design Handbook have been determined: (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The footprint of the proposed residence is located predominately in the footprint of the existing residence. Unlike other Sazatoga neighborhoods, the homes in the vicinity of Seagull Way are situated close together. To avoid unreasonable interference with the privacy of the adjacent neighbor to the east, staff has required that the applicant plant screening trees in the backyard along the perimeter of the east side property line to mitigate any impacts on privacy to the one-story home. The applicant proposed twelve Italian Cypress trees spaced 6 feet apart. Staff has conditioned the project that twelve 24-inch box Italian Cypress trees be spaced 6 feet apart. For reference, the average 24-inch box Italian Cypress is 8 feet in height and grows approximately two feet a year. The trees shall be irrigated with a drip or soaker system. The neighbor notification templates are attachment 2 of this report. U ~~0®0~'' (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. The proposed residence is not located in a rural • area of the City. It is adjacent to commercially zoned property in medium density zoning. The existing landscape will be relatively unchanged as a new two story residence will replace and existing two story residence. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. City Arborist review was not required. The only potential ordinance sized trees, are approximately eight fruit trees located in the rear yard. These fruit trees are separated from the building site by an existing fence. To protect the fruit trees, as a condition of approval, the existing fencing is to remain throughout construction. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bul/~ The second-story building lines are setback from the first-story. Second-story building lines are softened by rooflines from the first-story. The entry way is proportional to the residence. Architectural details such as stone accents on the entryway, chimney, and facade create architectural interest, and reduce mass and bulk. (e) Compatible bulk and height. The home is articulated with varying rooflines and moldings. The home is well-proportioned and not much different form the newer homes that have been built in the vicinity. The proposed residence will be in keeping with the general appearance of the site and neighborhood. (f) Current grading and erosion control methods. Th proposal would conform to • the City's current grading and erosion control method . (g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed prof ct conforms to all of the applicable design policies and techniques in the Resi ential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above and staff report. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, application number 04-035 for Design Review Approval is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. Landscaping shall be installed prior to final occupancy inspection. 2. The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A" incorporated by reference. All changes to the approved plans must be submitted in writing with a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. Proposed changes to the approved plans are subject to the approval of the Community Development . Director and may require review by the Planning Commission. OHO®10 • 3. The site plan shall contain a note with the following language: "Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the LLS of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per the approved plans." 4. A grading and drainage plan combined with a storm water retention plan indicating how all storm water will be retained on-site, and incorporating the New Development and Construction -Best Management Practices, shall be submitted along with the complete construction drawings. 5. The applicant or his designated representative shall apply for and secure a grading permit if deemed necessary. 6. No downgrading in the exterior appearance of the approved residence will be approved by staff. Downgrades may include but are not limited to garage doors, architectural detailing, stonework, columns, shutters, driveway materials, etc. Any exterior changes to approved plans may require filing an additional application and fees for review by the planning commission as a modification to approved plans. 7. Twelve 24-inch box Italian Cypress trees shall be planted along the east property line spaced 6 ft apart. The trees shall be irrigated with' a drip or soaker system and • shall be planted prior to final occupancy inspection. 8. Fencing for the fruit trees shall remain during construc ion. 9. No permit shall be issued for the project until the Applicant has submitted to the City a title report showing all parties having any interest in the property and any easements, encumbrances, and restrictions which benefit or burden the property and demonstrating that Applicant is the owner of the property (or that the owner has authorized Applicant to proceed with the project) and that the project will not interfere with any easements, encumbrances, or restrictions. GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW 10. The Project Geotechnical Consultant shall review and approve all geotechnical aspects of the final development plans (i.e., site preparation and grading, site surface and subsurface drainage improvements, and design parameters for foundations) to ensure that the plans, specifications and details accurately reflect the consultants' recommendations. 11. The results of the plan review shall be summarized by the Project Geotechnical Consultant in a letter(s) and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of permits. • 12. The Project Geotechnical Consultant shall inspect, test (as needed), and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project construction. The inspections shall include, 0~~©~1 but not necessarily be limited to: site preparation and grading, site surface and • subsurface drainage improvements, and excavations for fill keyways, and foundation construction, prior to placement of fill, steel and concrete. 13. The results of these inspections and the as-built conditions of the project shall be described by the Project Geotechnical Engineer in a letter(s) and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to Final Project Approval. 14. The owner (applicant) shall pay any outstanding fees associated with the City Geotechnical Consultant's review of the project prior to issuance of a Building Permit. CITY ATTORNEY 15. Applicant agrees to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. Section 2. Construction must commence within 36 months or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental • entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15-90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen days from the date of adoption PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission. State of California, the 10th day of November by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chair, Planning Commission .7 ~®~~~ n U • • ATTEST: Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date ~Q®®~3 • Attachment 2 r~ Q~®®~~ Neighbor Notification Template for 2 ~/ Development Applications l1 L~ ~ ~ Q • Date: ~` /~ ~ O 7 I I U PROJECT ADD SS: ~ ~ ~ '~ 3 ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~+ MAR 2 2 2004 //,~,, CITY OF SARATOGA Applicant Name:~~rnG' ~~C--- ~~'vl ~"~MIINtTYnPI/Fyn-!~.•- Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Staff and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. i • My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed~~. a project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I have issues or concerns, w ich after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns a ' the following (please attac~ additional sheets if nec ssary): ~ d r ~ +/ i ~ s tea,\l 2'1'10 :~ ~ ~~ -~-a ....~`-1~ l ~ ~ `~ :.~ z t'.~s 10,.,1-{~.a- ckl ~ K ~~--c~,~ ..~,,~~ ~} ~, Y ," ~J~- Neighbor Name: 1.. ~~C-12-'i ~ t~~'~- 7 1~~; /~ N ~"7 Neighbor Address: o~ ~ ~ ( J C7~ C~ l~(t i ~I A ~" ,• ~~` Ir ' "E'-'~" (_~.. ~~ 1 ~ ~~ Neighbor Phone #: l--t-~~--~ S ~." `'~~ Signature:, l; ~::~ ~- City of Saratoga Printed: Planning Department ~~~~~~ Neighbor Notification Template for ~,/ Development Applications • Date: ~ / 0 PROJECT ADDRESS:_ ~n l ~ ~ J 'e a ~( (,~ ~ ~ ~l~ G~, Applicant Name: ~ dm~ ~ ~~~I%~~ ~~ ~~ Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Stafj`'and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion . with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Neighbor Name: S I L~ bv~~~r~ ~ f~~ ~'' ~ R~-F ~~(~t'j Neighbor Address: ~ D'-I 3 ~- s e ~ ~ ~, ~ 1 ry~ ~' G~ le ~- ~ l ~5~ ~_ Neighbor Phone #: l ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 - ~l Signature: Printed: ~~ ~ ~ b ~ h~%~krl ~~~ City Of Saratoga Planning Department ~~~~J'~~ • Attachment 3 • ~~~®~~ WHITELAW PROPERTIES LLC 1033 WINDSOR ST SAN JOSE CA 95129-2836 ALAMEDA-FAROTTE ZOE TRUSTEE 12341 SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE RD SARATOGA CA 95070-3060 OLIVER-JAMHOUR DOLORES J DEPT-PT-CA-20902 SARATOGA COURTYARDS LLC TRUSTEE P O BOX 25025 1855 PARK AV 17330 LOCUST DR GLENDALE CA 91221-5025 SAN JOSE CA 95126-1635 LOS GATOS CA 95033-0000 BRENDLEN RICHARD J & BARBARA K TRUSTEE 12200 KIItKDALE DR SARATOGA CA 95070-3149 SMART GORDON R 12222 KIRKDALE DR SARATOGA CA 95070-3149 LEAMON RICHARD G & YVONNE M TRUSTEE 12236 KIItKDALE DR SARATOGA CA 95070-3149 MALLORY JOHN F & SUSANNE S 12258 KIRKDALE DR SARATOGA CA 95070-3149 STEELE MICHAEL D & HEDIEH 20376 KNOLLWOOD DR SARATOGA CA 95070-3121 VAN DYKE LOUISE A 6447 SHADOW HAWK DR CITRUS HEIGHTS CA 95621 OLIVER JOHN TRUSTEE PO BOX 729 MENDOCINO CA 95460-0729 LI CHOY HING & MEI-ZU TRUSTEE 20363 KNOLLWOOD DR SARATOGA CA 95070-3131 CLARK RON P 12219 KIItKDALE DR SARATOGA CA 95070-3116 LIU ALICE & GEORGE 20353 SEAGULL WY ~ARATOGA CA 95070-3126 BENEVENTO WILLIAM R & BETTY J TRUSTEE 12270 KIRKDALE DR SARATOGA CA 95070-3149 HAMILTON CHARLES A & REBECCAS 20364 KNOLLWOOD DR SARATOGA CA 95070-3121 OLIVER JOHN TRUSTEE PO BOX 729 MENDOCINO CA 95460-0729 WILLIAMS RICHARD G & MARIETTE D TRUSTEE E 12230 SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE RD SARATOGA CA 95070-3079 LIANG RU-YU & TIEN-LO C 20385 KNOLLWOOD DR SARATOGA CA 95070-3131 PERRY ELLA M 20325 SEAGULL WY SARATOGA CA 95070-3126 LEVALLEY JEFFREY K & DIANA C 10133 BERKSHIRE CT CUPERTINO CA 95014-5600 GEROLA HUMBERTO C & MARINA 20390 KNOLLWOOD DR SARATOGA CA 95070-3121 KATASHIBA KENICHI & TOMOKO 20342 KNOLLWOOD DR SARATOGA CA 95070-3121 OLIVER JOHN TRUSTEE PO BOX 729 MENDOCINO CA 95460-0729 BRUNI ARNOLD V & MARY E TRUSTEE 236 LOMA ALTA AV LOS GATOS CA 95030-6226 WANG BU-CHIN & RHODA Y 12231 KIRKDALE DR SARATOGA CA 95070-3116 SHEN ROBERT YU-FANG & DEBBIE J TRUSTEE 20600 DEBBIE LN SARATOGA CA 95070-4827 ENGELSON ARVIN & DALE I • 20381 SEAGULL WY SARATOGA CA 95070-3154 fl~Q®~.~ I,I HAOJIANG & LISA L 20395 SEAGULL WY TOGA CA 95070-3154 GALEB SLOBODAN & MARGARET E 20437 SEAGULL WY SARATOGA CA 95070-3156 DENG YIMEI & WEIZHONG 20409 SEAGULL WY SARATOGA CA 95070-3127 WALKER JEFFREY J & LYNN S 20451 SEAGULL WY SARATOGA CA 95070-3127 MAMMINI CORPORATION WHITE VICTOR A & 333 W SANTA CLARA ST 280 ELIZABETH R SAN JOSE CA 95113-1714 20393 ZORKA AV SARATOGA CA 95070-3133 LOH WAN WAH & MENG CHOO UTLEY KAROLE J TRUSTEE 20351 ZORKA AV 20324 SEAGULL WY SARATOGA CA 95070-3133 SARATOGA CA 95070-3125 PENG STEPHEN HSIN-YEH & XIAOMIN 20436 SEAGULL WY TOGA CA 95070-3128 SAVALA KAREN J 20394 SEAGULL WY SARATOGA CA 95070-3128 GUTHRIE WILLIAM &HUNG- CHIN 20422 SEAGULL WY SARATOGA CA 95070-3128 YANG ERIC X & LICHUN 20380 SEAGULL WY SARATOGA CA 95070-3128 GALEB SLOBODAN & MARGARET E ETAL 20437 SEAGULL WY SARATOGA CA 95070-3156 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 GALEB SLOBODAN & MARGARET E ETAL 20437 SEAGULL WY SARATOGA CA 95070-3156 RANGARAJU ANNAMALAI & HEMAMALINI 20375 LEUTAR CT SARATOGA CA 95070-3148 GALEB PAVING 12340 SARATOGA-SVALE RD 10 SARATOGA CA 95070 MAMMINI CORPORATION 333 W SANTA CLARA ST 280 SAN JOSE CA 95113-1714 HUSSAIN IMTIAZ & YASMIN 20338 SEAGULL WY SARATOGA CA 95070-3125 PATEL KIRIT D & DAMYANTI K 20381 ZORKA AV SARATOGA CA 95070-3133 MENDELSON NILDA FENYO TRUSTEE 20408 SEAGULL WY SARATOGA CA 95070-3128 DESANKA POPOVICH/ZORKA FICOVICH 12335 GOLETA SARATOGA CA 95070 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION CO SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 ROSHON ARTHUR H & CECILE F 20379 LEUTAR CT SARATOGA CA 95070-3148 FICOVICH ANTONA & ZORKA AZULE CROSSING LOUIE TERESA A M ETAL 12378 SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE 18000 HARVEST LN 12378 SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 RD SARATOGA CA 95070-3091 SARATOGA CA 95070-3091 I JAMIE ETAL SUN JIE & SHEHUA CHEN TSE KUN & KUALA FANG 06 HARVEST LN 18026 HARVEST LN 18032 HARVEST LN SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 {)Q®~~~ AJIMINE ERIC & LYNNE 18050 HARVEST LN SARATOGA CA 95070 MOW MATTHEW & DIANAH ETAL 18088 HARVEST LN SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 SHAO MIN JEN & TESSA 18079 HARVEST LN SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 HASAN JAVED & NEENA 18021 HARVEST LN SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 LEONG WAH SOON & CINDY Y 18117 HARVEST LN SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 LUI ANDREW K & DONNA F 18018 HARVEST LN SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 SHANBHAG SANTOSH S & SHILPA S 18068 HARVEST LN SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 CHEN HSIN-LIANG & SHAN- HSIN 18096 HARVEST LN SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 CHAN KAM KIN & YUET YIN 18037 HARVEST LN SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 CHAN KAR M & SHIOUER 18015 HARVEST LN SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 HUEY KEVIN S 18101 HARVEST LN SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 LI HENRY H & LINDA L 18076 HARVEST LN SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 CHID JING WU & DASIA J 18083 HARVEST LN SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 SALAZAR ALEXIS K & CATRINA A 18029 HARVEST LN SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 TZAVARAS PETER J ETAL 18128 HARVEST LN SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 HO WAIYAN 18010 HARVEST LN SARATOGA CA 95070-0000 • ADACHI SACHI E & TATSUK~ TRUSTEE 20431 CUNNINGHAM PL SARATOGA CA 95070-4327 ~~O®~G • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) I, ~ V ~ ti~ ~ lJ~-~, RJ " ""~peing duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the ' ed States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga -W~- Planning Commission on the 2'S day of 2004, that I deposited in the United States Post Office within Santa Clara County, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to-wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) • that said persons are the owners of said property who are ent tied to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15-45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property to be affected by the application; that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. ~~ ~ _ -- Signed C~ • 20096 VJ '~~~V1NV8 ~~~ _-~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~sl~lel~l~l~l~l: X00-610 (00f) oto96 va 'vootvdvs IIVM T~V36 9xFOZ ~~a~~ Sao-z9-a~ ~av dvw Almon dVw ~Jl~Vd ~~ 9~~ ~ ~ ~~~~gp ~ aaa~sasaaaa55a $~~~3~~_~°H94FR~ e: $2$~ i ~~ ~I ~ ~i! 3 ,00 ~~ I I F 1 I I I I~ I 1 I ~~~ _ J M N N a 1 N ~1 -~ i4~ ~ yp ~ r~----- I I I~,Q I ii 1 I~~ I __ __~ -- - --- r I 1 I I 1 _J Tit J 1 I ~ .- _M 1 ~ w w ~~ ,OO~OSI ~,oo.zs 0~ a z~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~+i ELj! as ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a o0 -~an a,• do ~ s du ~N+,+• c~- Ha+ ~ r~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 - ----- -----~ -----T - 1 1 Q I --~-~~ ------------T - - ---~19Mil~CLI000.o~¢ I I .~ I 1 1 1 1 ^ ^ I _ I _~~ r~ ~ 1 I o I Y ~ n ~~ ~` Q ~w~+ mAd -~a+t .o,c t~ ~~ 12 b ~i - - ~ _ d t.~o~ ~~v~v's env -erx~ ~ z+~o-ece (eor) o~o~ v~ ~vooiv~rs JIVM T~ri-36 ~Z~OZ ~1V0 Vl~Va '~ ONIOl ~IOd ~Vl~ Jl3Al~18 J.~Vl~l 1VNOw0 ~~~I~ ~~ x ~ €~~ ~ ~ . uh w ^~ ~~ ~~~~•~ {F;~~~ ~vGG.iy~ UU- ~i 4•4•~~V• ~Y^~i~7~ - + N ~~,.~~V•~~ ~~ ~~~ r~ ~~'~ ,x SiwC~ u • s~ ~ • ~ ~• ~ 't M r ~ ~ + w w ~ • Y. • i~: px~ ~~.~ r ~SY •T i ii'~t•.t-~ ~~~~`( 3 ~ ~+` ~ 7 ~'t+t~v~+~ -~ 2 ~~ ~s ; ~ ~~ » : W 3~,~~'t`g•f'E ~ 'it ~ ~~1V9'1'Q I' wgss • !~ ~ ~ LL ~~?~~_~~ ~ • ~ i x !~ _i~.=,wl.~~_'' ~ Grp •• • y _ ~. ,~.:~~ ~ iii ~''~ ~ ~• ~ •`' x a ~ I Y a. s A uJ LL ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ t .RS/ •...~a r ..r. ~ ~`.b~/ ~ N, /' p ~ ~_.~° ~ $ ~ a a a ~ ~~ ~ i' I ~ ~ ~~3~ ~E W ~. O ~ `~ r .wa.4...ss wl ..rs~~.», r ~ i V F Z v ~i ti 1 ~a q wQ ~+~6 ~ t ~i r ~ f ", i. OC ~ .!t ~ '_' _ "E~~~ - .W~ A Z ^' z. ~J t~ t v w + I~ ~~ ~ ~ (~ ~ ~ r.~~~ f N O O 1 "R~ S` 1 l'1 ..~ n a.N~a e LL O J C ~~+~s~~ €z ro !4 ~ ~ I , W w M ~~ Q ~ ~i ~ i w~ i O ~~ N °°st» ael~: ~ ~ I ~ MI v 33 ~'~ W ~ J _ ~-. 1 - v F- r- M t=' ~ r 1 0. ~ 0 v Y .:IET~~x~ 1 ~ A aya -- - S) ~ ~•~.. s!b!t!~ ~ ~ 4 Z M Q ~~J~R~'j~.w i ~ Q _ avo~a'af,.11w..M-cuv rsolvYrs gr-----~ •__ - W 'J s.s'raf~Rpi. ~ ~ U r 5C ?fv Q I ? ~ 4~ ; r' Z809a 11J ~~~V1MV'8 env ~ooe ~ Z9~0-6L6 (8010 oco~ v~ liooivdvs JIVM T 6"~rOZ 9~IVF) VNVa HIV OY101 ~lOd 3J1~9O6~1 ~VI~J N1rid 1PA836Y8 ~O~dOkJd ~~~~~ ~~ a ~:,~ .o,~ .r~ *,a .rn o,v~ ~ I I I I II II II u T n 11 I I n II II ____~ ~ _____~ ~==.I~ ___~ ~_-------- r r~ L LJ n I I I I ~~~ ~ i - II r r ~ II L LJ II i II T II II 1 M u ~ ILJ~ W II I~------- II lr--------- II - JI ___----__~~_---=~1 II II II II II II II I~------- II II Ir_____-- II II II _ 1 I ~ n n n it I -------- ----- J A+>r A+i1 do A~ol .o- z~ v~ ~~v~s env ~ar~oo~ ~ zwo-its ~eor) atoms v~'voolvdv~s IIVM T~V36 6Z/OE ~lV~ 1/E!1/Q ~- 01-r01 <~ ~NVia doo-d ~ ! ~~~'I E a 1 ~~ fi s, -----~1___-J 1 I I I I I I 1 O .......J 1 ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ N N r ^ ~D F ~ ~- ~ H F- F- ~ i ~• ~ N ~ $ ~, ~ S ~, ~ u. n ~, 4 LL; n ~ ~ ~ ~ a, n u, n Y, ,n ¢; g ~ ~ I ~~ J 1J.. I ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O o w ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ v t-rr~-ter (~e) ~ va 'mom v~rs env ~r~oo~ v~ = 9TH z~a~ce (eor) o~o~ v~'voo~vdv~s ~IVM T 6ZI~OZ ~1V0 VHVa all/ OIPIOl i~ ~rl~l NIVdDV10 Y~V E100'~I NY'Id H00'ld PAZ ®SOdOdd .~,a .TJllFtilr , Ic- --------------- I I ` / -1-------+-- I \\ // 1 I / ~~ ~ // 1 I 1 ----- / ~------ -- -~_____=_ ~_----- 7 _ // ~\ ~ / ~ i ~ 1 it w `` \ \~~ /// /// -------- ~ i 1 ~ 1 / I K / /~ I I /i ~ /i i ~/ i ~ i \~ // `\~ 1 n ~ / ~~ / 1 'I - -- ------ ~ --~--- ----_ -------11-- ---- --~ ----T- ~~ ~ _,_~ c----------=~J ~~ r~ r~ I I ~ ~i LJ LJ n // // .Y~Y /W/~ j Ih • // // ~/r Fri / lrs~ / ~~ / r---~ - 1 ~1 / ~ I I 1 I / I ~~ r~ r~ ~ J Y/ I / - I it LJ LJ 'a i_ /mow /TT -~/ / ~ __ 4 ~T // /~ II I + ~ / / Y /// / ~ Y_M/1 // i _ - _ ~y 1 / / .~7V ~/ / I ~j j Y~ // // ~~ ~ / I / . n I ~ I _ ,/ ~ ,/ ,/ I ~ 1 ~ . / . I y~ 1 ___ Ir- ~\ I ~ ~ ~ \` 1 / ~ ~ I 1 / / \\\\\` \\` 1 1 // ~\ \\ ~ ~ \\ i ------- ~~--------------- -y `` II ----- ------ ter- -ru n - JL~ c== JS --=c c-====__ I ~I i ~1 I ~ ~I ~ i c---=----_~ J w~ ~, ~~ O - O o ~ O ~ ~ ~ o ~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~o 0000000000 ~~ f'1-1-i'~EZ'1~ ~~ ~ va'~rr~ v~vs env ~rx~os ~ ~H~ ='oT~ Z'NO-6L9 (A0~) aco~ v~'voo~vdvs JIVM T~Y~6 8'ZrOZ ~1Vfl VM/a HIV ODUOl 8NOl1V/l3'B d0~81X3 6!I jl f ¢ ~ t-erw~zr (tee) ~ v~'m~a v~vs env ~r~oo~ ~ ~o-ete (eor) aco9e v~ woolvdv~s AVM T~3Y36 ~rOZ ~1VO VdVQ ~!V Oi~101 3~06~ SNOLLV/13'8 dO~SLX3 ~~~a ! Q f F F 'C111.0~1[ • ~ - I .IFb .O~ .o-~01 i I I ~ I I I I I i I I I I I ~ I I I I ~ I I I I __: 1 I ~ ® I I ~ I ~ I I I ' •~ I I ~ --_ I I I I I ' I I -- I 1 I i I I I I I . ~ , - _ I I i - r ~ I I I' I I I I ~ ~ I I I I I I i ~ I p ,. i - I I I I ~ ~ I I I I I' I i I I I I ' I I~ ~ i i i i t ~ ~ ~~ a l I I I, ;~ _ I I I I I l i i ' ~ I ' ~ ~~ I - - - I I I I I ' I I I I I I I ~ I l i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I ~ I I I I Q I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I ' I I I ~~ I I I I I I t I I I I ~~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I ~~ i I I I I I I I I I i I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I ® I ~ I I I I I I I I - I I I I I I I I ~ I I I ~ I ~ 4~ I I I ' e I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I ® I I I I I' I I 1 I ' I I I I ' I I I I ' I I I I h I I I I I I I ~ I I I ~ ~ I I ' I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I ~ I I I , I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~~ ~ I I ~ I I I ~ I I ~~~ ~ ~~ Z'~09a VJ ~~~V1N11'S ~~ ~~~ QLA9d VJ 'VOOlVl~11S A1/M T~l~B 6~OZ ~111~ VHVa HIV ONIOl IOd 3~608~11J~V'1~! Q aavw a,v~anv cu xw+.o,9c ,.:.. , ,S U U .~:: .p-,f .o,- ro,a n .t-.4 aavrr arv~w au xw~ .a,u • • .~ Item 2 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No./Location: 04-151/ 12033 Miller Avenue (Sign Permit) Applicant/Owner: Diocese of San Jose/Rev. Paul L. Duong Staff Planner: Ann Welsh, AICP, Associate Planner Date: November 10, 2004 APN: 386-35-069 Depaztment Head: DANRO~AS WY ~ i I Church Sign Perrrit ~~ ~~ MILL~RAV ~---- _ _ .. _ _...... _... i _ _ _ Q 500 ft radius -- ' ~ IVY LIST---- - j P ~ ~ T I ~ LA I~I AV ~ ER V I_ __ __ _____ __ I ROSPECT R~ -_-_ --P OSPECT R ----- PROSPECT'RD -- --._..-- -- _ .._.... _ _ _ __._ ---- PROSPECT RD{ - SC LL AY ~ LE AV ~~ I I <~~ I D ~R~C ~ AV I i AV PROS ECT RD I I I \V I 100 200 300 400 500 ft u ~a~,,, I l i f ~--1 12033 Miller Avenue 000001 # 04-151- Sign Permit 12033 Miller Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY Application filed: 5/10/04 Application complete: 10/15/04 Notice published: 10/27/04 Mailing completed: 10/26/04 Posting completed: 10/15/04 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This application is a request for a sign permit to place an internally illuminated sign on the property of the Church of the Ascension, which is located at the corner of Prospect Road and Miller Avenue. The Church is located within the R-10,000 zoning district, which does not permit illuminated signs. The proposed sign would be seven feet high at the top most point. The dimensions of the sign are six feet wide by four feet high. Atwo-foot high planter is proposed at the base of the sign. The total sign area is 24 square feet. The sign is two sided and internally illuminated with five 40-watt neon tubes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION ' The recommendation is to den the sign permit due to the i pact on the character of Y the residential area. ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft Resolution 2. Affidavit of Mailing 3. Neighborhood Correspondence 4. Plans, Exhibit "A" • 000002 # 04-151- Sign Permit • 12033 Millet Avenue STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R-1,10,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: M-10 -Medium Density Residential MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE: AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: Average Slope of the lot is less than 10%. GRADING REQUIRED: No grading of the site is proposed. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-family residences. The project site is in an urbanized area and is connected to utility and roadway infrastructure. MATERIALS AND COLORS PROPOSED: The sign is to be ' black letters on a white background. • 3 ©00003 # 04-I51-Sign Permit 12033 Miller Avenue , PROJECT DISCUSSION The applicant proposes to construct a freestanding, internally illuminated 24 square foot sign approximately 16 feet from Prospect Road. The character of the area is residential in nature and the sign would be located across from single-family dwellings. The sign is proposed to identify the Church of the Ascension and the hours of worship services. The sign is a two-sided sign, which is illuminated by five, forty-watt neon tubes. The maximum wattage of the sign would be 200 watts which is the maximum permitted by the city for such signs. The R-1 Zoning District does not permit internally illuminated signs and the applicant is requesting a variance to the sign regulations to permit this sign. The zoning ordinance identifies criteria for evaluating sign permits and the proposed sign does not meet these criteria. NecessaryFindings The Zoning Ordinance, Section 15-30.070 identifies the following criteria which must be applied in reviewing a sign permit application: (a) That the sign complies with the regulations of the zoning ordinance and the regulations of the district in which it will be located; (b) That the size, shape, color, illumination, placement and material of the sign is compatible with the building it identifies and with the visual characteristics of the neighborhood and other lawful signs in the area; (c) That the location and design of the sign does not obscure from view or unduly detract from existing adjacent signs; (d) That the location and design of a sign in close proximity to any residential district will not adversely affect the quality or character of such residential area. Actual Findings The following findings have been made regarding the proposed sign. 1. That the sign complies with the regulations of the zoning ordinance and the regulations of the district in which it will be located; The internally illuminated sign does not comply with the regulations of the R-1 Zoning District. The Residential district allows identification signs for religious institutions, which are 24 square feet in area. However, the ordinance does not allow internally illuminated signs within such districts. Moreover, a windshield survey of existing religious signs in the City revealed that the standard for such uses is an indirectly illuminated sign, which identifies the religious institution. The proposed sign would be a departure from this standard. 400004 # 04.151- Sign Permit 12033 Miller Avenue ' 2. (b) That the size, shape, color, illumination, placement and material of the sign is compatible with the building it identifies and with the visual characteristics of the neighborhood and other lawful signs in the area; Staff finds that the size, shape and color of the proposed sign are within the design guidelines for the residential zoning district. However, the method and intensity of illumination and placement are not in keeping with the character of a residential zoning district. The character of religious signs within Saratoga is more typically a wooden sign that is indirectly illuminated. Given the residential character of the area the highly illuminated sign proposed by the applicant is not in keeping with the surrounding residential neighborhood. 3. That the location and design of the sign does not obscure from view or unduly detract from existing adjacent signs. The proposed location of the sign which is 104 feet from the intersection of Prospect and Miller and 16 feet from the curb of Prospect Road. The proposed location of the sign is within the front yard setback, which is 25 feet from the right of way. Since the zoning ordinance does not permit structures higher than three feet within the front yard setback the proposed location would require an exception to this requirement. 4. That the location and design of a sign in close proximity to any residential district will not adversely affect the quality or character of such residential area The placement of an intensely illuminated sign along the residential portion of Prospect Road would in staff s opinion adversely affect the character of the residential area. Conclusion In conclusion staff finds that the proposed sign fails to conform to the criteria for issuing a sign permit as set forth in Section 15-30.070 of the Zoning Ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The recommendation is to deny the sign permit due to the impact on the character of the residential area by adopting the resolution for application #04-151. • 0~~~~5 Attachment 1 • ~oo~Qs # 04-151- Sign Petmit 12033 Miller Avenue RESOLUTION N0.04- APPLICATION N0.04-151 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Diocese of San Jose/ 12033 Miller Avenue WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for a sign permit to construct a seven foot high, 24 square foot illuminated sign for the Church of the Ascension WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS the project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-family residences. The site is in an urbanized area and is connected to utility and roadway infrastructure and involves the construction of one sign; and WHEREAS, the applicant has not met the burden of proof required to support said application for sign permit approval, and the following findings have been determined: 1. The internally illuminated sign does not comply with the regulations ofthe R-1 ~'oning District. The Residential district allows identification signs for religious institutions, which are 24 square feet in area. However, the ordinance does not allow internally illuminated signs within such districts. 2. That the site, shape, color, illumination, placement and material of the sign is compatible with the building i[ identifies and with the visual characteristics of the neighborhood and other lawful signs in the area; Staff finds that the size, shape and color of the proposed sign are within the design guidelines for the residential zoning district. However, the method and intensity of illumination and placement are not in keeping with the character of a residential zoning district. • O~DOn~ # 04-151- Sign Permit 12033 Miller Avenue . 3. That the location and design of the sign does not obscure from view or unduly detract from existing adjacent signs; The proposed location of the sign which is 104 feet from the intersection of Prospect and Miller and 16 feet from the curb of Prospect Road. The proposed location of the sign is within the front yard setback, which is 25 feet from the right of way. Since the zoning ordinance does not permit structures higher than three feet within the front yard setback the proposed location would require an exception to this requirement. 4. That the location and design of a sign in close proximity to any residential district will not adversely affect the quality or character of such residential area. The placement of an intensely illuminated sign along the residential portion of Prospect Road would in staff's opinion adversely affect the character of the residential area. Now, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the application by for a sign permit is hereby denied. CITY ATTORNEY 1. Applicant agrees to hold Ciry harmless from all co is and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liabili of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in y State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. 2. Noncompliance with any of the conditions of this permit shall constitute a violation of the permit. Because it is impossible to estimate damages the City could incur due to the violation, liquidated damages of $250 shall be payable to this City per each day of the violation. Section 2. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 3. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15-90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. • ~®~®~8 # 04-151- Sign Permit 12033 Miller Avenue PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 10th day of November 2004 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: Secretary, Planning Commission ermit is hereb acce ted u on the a ress t sand conditions hereof, This p y p p xp and shall have no force or effect unless and until a eed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date • do~~(~~ • Attachment 2 • ~~0~~0 • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) l,~iY/ /~~/~-'~'~- ein dul sworn de oses and sa s: that I am a I, H G , b g Y ~ p Y citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 yea/rs; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the of ~ day of ~t~ 2004, that I deposited in the United States Post Office within Santa Clara County, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to-wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15-45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property to be affected by the application; that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. ~~ -.... Signed • 000011 n4 1:3; ~ ~ I'RI-i'I'~~ALE A\7,Nt'I-; SAPA'I'O(~A. CALII=C)}-;NIA 9:~0"r0 (4051 568-1'?0O i`t )1'Nl'll. ~1G14131~;KS: Incotpora6ed Octob~~r'h, l9fiG NOTICE OF HEARING BEFORE PLANNING COMIVIISSION Stan Bogvsian Kathleen Kmv ,Nvm?an Kline Nick Streit Ann Waltonsmith CITY OF SARATOGA'S PLANNING COMMISSION announces the following public hearing on Wednesday, the 10th day of November at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, which are located in the Civic Theater at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Project details and plans are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Thursday, 7:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. If you have questions, on the project please direct them to Ann Welsh, Associate Planner, awelsh@saratoga.ca.us or 408-868-1230. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time d place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a public hearing 'n court, you maybe limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the publi hearing(s) described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Saratoga Pl ing Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. In order to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed on or before the Tuesday, a week before the meeting. APPLICATION #04-151 (386-35-069) CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION, DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE, 12033 Miller Ave.-The applicant, Church of the Ascension, requests a Sign Permit to construct a seven foot high freestanding, six foot wide x four foot high, illuminated sign along Prospect Avenue. The illuminated sign is proposed to replace the existing wooden sign at the southwest corner of Miller & Prospect Avenues. C~ J ~~~~~~ lam Fn» PriMinq Use Avery TEMPLATE 5160® .GRAN ESTELLA C & KWAN H TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner BOX 303 ERTINO, CA 95015-0303 PRESSMAN DANIEL J & BEVERLY R orCunrent Owner 1660 DANROMAS WY SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3906 CHEN SHUI C & HSIU Y orCurrent Owner 1529 CONSTANSO WY SAN JOSE, CA 95129-4949 TYAN HUNG-YING & SHIN-FEI orCurrent Owner 6351 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3943 ALLEN ROBERT R & NWE N TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 6379 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3943 LEY ROSEMARY J TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 6378 TVY LN SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3918 LAKSTIGALA JOHN & JII,L A orCurrent Owner 6352 TVY LN SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3918 CAMARDA ANTHONY & ANN E orCurrent Owner 1657 DANROMAS WY SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3907 O'DONNELL PHILIP & MARILYN orCurrent Owner 1693 DANROMAS WY SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3907 ES MYRON I orCurrent Owner 8 TVY LN SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3900 i ~ wvWw.averycom ~' 1-800-GO AVERY LIN YI-NAN & CHING-CHIN orCun ent Owner 1684 DANROMAS WY SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3906 GILL JASPAL S & BLINDER orCurrent Owner 1659 MILLER AV SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3942 GUINN ROBERT & PATRICIA D TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 1695 MILLER AV SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3942 LI FULIN & TONGXIN orCun ent Owner 6359 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3943 TANG ERIC S orCurrent Owner 1690 LARKIN AV SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3929 AUMAN WILLIAM S & ELAINE T TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 6368 TVY LN SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3918 KINGSBURY ALLIN D & EILEEN D TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 1658 ELMAR WY SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3914 REN MIN & JIANHONG orCurrent Owner 1669 DANROMAS WY SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3907 KLAVINS ANDREW & DOROTHY A orCurrent Owner 6492 TVY LN SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3900 WONG DENNIS R & KAREN S orCun ent Owner 6426 TVY LN SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3900 p A~~® 5,60 AHERN RITA J ESTATE OF orCun ent Owner 1672 DANROMAS WY SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3906 MAY DAVID R & COLLEEN W orCurrent Owner 1671 MILLER AV SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3942 LI TIES & HONG orCurrent Owner 6343 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3943 JOSHI SUNEEL D & PRATIMA S orCurrent Owner 6367 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3943 SMITH EDWARD M & PATRICIA C TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 1662 LARKIN AV SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3929 SHIOYA KUNITAKA T & ETSUKO orCurrent Owner 6360 TVY LN SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3918 SHIOYA KUNTTAKA T & ETSUKO TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 6360 TVY LN SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3918 DUBOFF ALAN J & JUNKO orCun-ent Owner 1681 DANROMAS WY SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3907 PARK JOSEPH C & YOUNG J TRUSTEE ETAL orCurrent Owner 6470 TVY LN SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3900 MARASCHIN ROBERT W & MARIETA Z orCurrent Owner 1665 LARKIN AV SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3928 X40®~.3 ~~ Jlb3AV-O~-008-L ~ ®09LS 31KIdW31®IC~and ash nn~ ~ ww iLJAM 1`l~l ...__.r._._....... ~u~n~uu asi~ wor Jam Froe P~iMinO Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5160® FAN KYLE C & SHU-CHIN orCurrent Owner , 6405 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3840 LEE LI HUA HO orCurrent Owner 6471 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3840 BUFORD NORMA L ETAL orCurrent Owner 6537 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3841 HAHN SUSIE orCurrent Owner 6524 IVY LN SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3837 ADELBERG CHARLES R & DAVIDA W orCun ent Owner 6268 TRACEL DR SAN JOSE, CA 95129-4761 ARMES GEORGE F & BETTY G orCurrent Owner 6232 TRACEL DR SAN JOSE, CA 95129-4761 orCurrent Owner MA CHENG H & TERESA orCurrent Owner 6283 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-4740 KUMAGAI YOSHITARO & YOKO orCurrent Owner 12168 TERRENCE AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3347 DEAL WILLIAM A & LORI TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 12138 TERRENCE AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3347 n ~ www.averycom 1-800-GO-AVERY GROVIER EDWIN J & MIREILLE M TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 6427 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3840 CHAMBERS RALPH W & ELAINE A TRUSTEE orCun ent Owner 6493 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3840 TING CHARLES & MARGARET A orCun ent Owner 6545 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3841 MUSSETT CHRISTOPHER J & KATHRYN F orCurrent Owner 6292 TRACEL DR SAN JOSE, CA 95129-4761 BROWNLIE RICHARD E TRUSTEE orCunrent Owner 6256 TRACEL DR SAN JOSE, CA 95129-4761 JOHN D SANFORD & LYSBETH F SANFORD orCurrent Owner 6223 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-4740 KANG ANDY & JULIE orCurrent Owner 6259 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-4740 ADDA SARVESH & SWARNA orCurrent Owner 6295 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-4740 BROGLIATTI MICHAEL L & GEORGIA H TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 12154 TERRENCE AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3347 YOUNG GERALD W & KAY orCurrent Owner 12122 TERRENCE AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3347 ~a3nv-o~-oos-~ ... a A~~® 5160® PUJARE SANJAY M & USHA orCurrent Owner 6449 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3840 LO JEFF CHENG-LUNG & CONNIE CHI-HUI KAO E orCurrent Owner 6515 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3841 LIANG SHENGHUI S & SHUYUN S orCurrent Owner 6538 IVY LN SAN JOSE, CA 95129-3837 LIANG CHUNGTI A & GLORIA I orCurrent Owner 6280 TRACEL DR SAN JOSE, CA 95129-4761 CHANG ENG-SON & JANE H orCurrent Owner 6244 TRACEL DR SAN JOSE, CA 95129-4761 WUNSCH DAVID E & ROSEMARIE orCurrent Owner 6235 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-4740 HU CHENG C & JEAN C TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 6271 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE, CA 95129-4740 GORDON ERNEST S & MARCIA S TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 12176 TERRENCE AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3347 SHIN FRANK D & MOON JOO orCurrent Owner 12146 TERRENCE AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3347 JOHNSON ROBERT J & ROSEMARY TRUSTEE orC Owner 12111 TERRENCE AV SARATOGA, CA 950~~~~~ ®o9~s ~~ndw~ ~t,a~d a:~ 'lam Fna Printing Usa Avary~ TEMPLATE 5160 HSU LAWRENCE L & POLLY~ P orCurrent Owner 12129 TERRENCE AV TOGA, CA 95070-3346 ANDRIS ROBERT P & CECILIA C TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 12155 TERRENCE AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3346 LEE GEORGE J ETAL orCun ent Owner 12142 SCULLY AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3339 GUPTA ANIL & SUMAN orCurrent Owner 12110 SCULLY AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3339 CHU WEI-MING & ROGER H orCurrent Owner 19499 ERIC DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3310 ~ATRICKS MISSIONA RY SOCIETY orCurrent Owner 19536 ERIC DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3354 BIRNBAUM MARGARET M & DAVID N orCurrent Owner 12073 CANDY LN SARATOGA, CA 95070-3366 LIN PHILIP M & JULIA H orCurrent Owner 12123 CANDY LN SARATOGA, CA 95070-3307 CLARKE FERGUS & MAURA orCurrent Owner 12175 CANDY LN SARATOGA, CA 95070-3307 L GURPREET & RANDEEP rrent Owner 12074 CANDY LN SARATOGA, CA 95070-3365 ~ wrww.avaryoom ~~ 1-800-CO-AVERY KAREL STEVEN & ELLEN A orCurrent Owner 12137 TERRENCE AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3346 CHANDRAMOULI RAMAMURTI & RANJANI orCun ent Owner 12167 TERRENCE AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3346 SIGNORE VINCENZO & SANDRA orCurrent Owner 12138 SCULLY AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3339 WHITE DENNIS F & ANGELA orCurrent Owner 19465 ERIC DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3310 HILDEBRAND AUDREY orCun ent Owner 19519 ERIC DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3310 MUZZY RAYMOND J & DONNA D TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19518 ERIC DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3354 APPLEGATE GENE B & BETH A orCun ent Owner 12091 CANDY LN SARATOGA, CA 95070-3366 NIEDLE CHARLES F ETAL orCun ent Owner 12141 CANDY LN SARATOGA, CA 95070-3307 CAMPBELL RICHARD I TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 12110 CANDY LN SARATOGA, CA 95070-3308 BROUILLETTE BRIAN T & LOIS F orCurrent Owner 12058 CANDY LN SARATOGA, CA 95070-3365 ® AVERY®s~~ HOA YUNG-SHENG & PAI-LING orCurrent Owner 12141 TERRENCE AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3346 WANG SHIN-TAY & YING-WEN orCurrent Owner 12150 SCULLY AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3339 HUTZ JOHN B & ELIZABETH K orCurrent Owner 12130 SCULLY AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3339 CARCANIS GLORIA M TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19481 ERIC DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3310 FONTENOT JANET TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19537 ERIC DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3310 BOSTIC CHARLES R JR & JII,L TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 12057 CANDY LN SARATOGA, CA 95070-3366 PENG ANDREW & JIH-HORNG orCun ent Owner 12111 CANDY LN SARATOGA, CA 95070-3307 JOHNSON TERRY T & SUSAN E TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 12153 CANDY LN SARATOGA, CA 95070-3307 LEE JAMES A & REGINA C TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 12092 CANDY LN SARATOGA, CA 95070-3365 JANG YIHBAN & ALICE orCurrent Owner 12200 MILLER AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3324 ®o®a..s ~~ Jla3AV-09-008-L ~. ®09L5 31V'IdW31®IGand ash _nn~e .cn 1~19AM 1`~l/1 .......L.~~n•~~~w~w 6u4uud aa.~~ wed lam Free Printing Use Awry TEMPLATE 5160® GALL JAY K & CHERYL K orCurrent Owner 12198 MILLER AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3324 FRANKEL STEVEN B & DONNA orCurrent Owner 19557 ARDEN CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3301 ~ wv~w.averycom ~ 1-Sd0-GO-AVERY HUPTON JAMES R & BONNIE E TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 12176 MILLER AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3324 YANG EDWARD Y & PING G TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19569 ARDEN CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3301 SMITH AUGUST D & BARBARA DANIHER WILLIAM C & TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner NANCY L orCurrent Owner 12124 MILLER AV 19572 ARDMORE CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3357 SARATOGA, CA 95070-3302 SON JINSHU & KEIBUN WANG KENNY & FEI orCurrent TRUSTEE orCun: ent Owner Owner 19555 ARDMORE CT 19567 ARDMORE CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3302 SARATOGA, CA 95070-3302 BURLESON DAVID W & TERRY LIU DAVID R & WEN-HWA J orCurrent Owner TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19686 ASCENSION DR 19666 ASCENSION DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3356 SARATOGA, CA 95070-3356 CHANG JEAN C & DAVID orCurrent Owner 19620 ASCENSION DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3356 TOLANI ANAND S & RIE orCurrent Owner 19604 ASCENSION DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3356 LIU HUI & QI orCurrent Owner 19617 ASHTON CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3303 FERNANDEZ DENNIS J & CHERYL D TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19684 ASHTON CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3303 DIBIASE RONALD J & JAYNE L orCurrent Owner 19618 ASHTON CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3303 LI DANIEL F & NANCY Y TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19619 LADERA CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3329 CHANG CHEN CHI & ALICE YIAFEN TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19655 ASHTON CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3303 KUO DAREN TAN LUN & SHEAULI GRACIE TRUSTE orCun ent Owner 19668 ASHTON CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3303 YOUNG MARY Y TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19602 ASHTON CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3303 CATHCART WILLIAM T & JACQUELINE L TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19645 LADERA CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3329 D /~~RY® 5160® TRUCKAI CSABA & GABRIELLA orCurrent Owner 19566 ARDEN CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3301 THOMAS ROBERT H & ELIZABETH M TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 12148 MILLER AV SARATOGA, CA 95070-3357 FLORA ROBERT E & WANDA A orCurrent Owner 19560 ARDMORE, CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3302 C/O CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION orCurrent Owner 12072 MII,LER AV SARATOGA, CA 95070 POPYLISEN DANIEL M & JOAN B orCurrent Owner 19642 ASCENSION DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3356 SOONG YEONG C & TSELI orCurrent Owner 19603 ASHTON CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3303 MIRTH GEORGE P & LINDA S orCurrent Owner 19671 ASHTON CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3303 KULM ELMER R & FRANCES E TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19644 ASHTON CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3303 MA BILL WEI-HSIIJNG & HELEN HUNG-CHURN YEH orCurrent Owner 19601 LADERA CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3329 YING TIEN-PING & STELL orCurrent Owner 19661 LADERA CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3329 ~~®~1.6 ~^1 Jla3Ad-09-008-L ~ ®095 31V1dW31®IGand asn 1~ ------~----•------ 6unuua aaJa wer Jam Free Printing ~ wrww.averycom Q AVEI~Y® 5160® Use Avery TEMPLATE 5160® ~~ 1-800-GO AVERY C/O CHURCH OF THE , ASCENSION orCurrent Owner 2 MILLER AV ~ATOGA, CA 95070 CHANG YAO H ETAL orCurrent Owner 19771 COLBY CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3202 KHOO SAM & PAMELA K TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 2025 CALIFORNIA ST 3 MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94040- 1970 PIAZZA ROGER & MARY J orCurrent Owner 19828 COLBY CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3202 KEENER NEIL A & JUDITH A TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19798 COLBY CT S TOGA, CA 95070-3202 B OWN GRIFFITH M & LOIS M TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19773 VIEWRIDGE DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3236 LIND ROBERT A & BONNIE E orCurrent Owner 19809 VIEWRIDGE DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3236 LUAN CHUNG CHEN TONY & MEI-PING GRACE orCun ent Owner 19796 VIEWRIDGE DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3205 LIOU WEN CHUNG & KA HUNG orCurrent Owner 19775 OAKHAVEN DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3213 • orCurrent Owner CONGREGATION BETH DAVID orCurrent Owner 19700 PROSPECT RD SARATOGA, CA 95070-3352 PATTERSON JAMES H & MARSHA C orCurrent Owner 19783 COLBY CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3202 WANG LUNG WEN & SIU LAN orCurrent Owner 19819 COLBY CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3202 ANDERSON ALTON & CARMEN TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19816 COLBY CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3202 SHAO LINGXIONG & YING orCurrent Owner 19786 COLBY CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3202 KAOKLEINK&IUEFH orCun ent Owner 19785 VIEWRIDGE DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3236 FAN CHUNG-HO &CHEN-HUII M orCurrent Owner 19815 VIEWRIDGE DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3236 MONTGOMERY-RAYL NORMA L TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19784 VIEWRIDGE DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3205 KASS ALFRED J & MARLENE W TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19787 OAKHAVEN DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3213 orCurrent Owner CONGREGATION BETH DAVID orCurrent Owner 19700 PROSPECT RD SARATOGA, CA 95070-3352 HAYWARD JANICE L orCunent Owner 19795 COLBY CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3202 WYANDT DAVID A & BERNADETTE M orCu~rrent Owner 19827 COLBY CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3202 CHEN LILY H & PASCAL S orCurrent Owner 4F,#3,LANE 8,LING-YI ST TAIPEI, DEGIVE LOUIS P & BERNICE S TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19774 COLBY CT SARATOGA, CA 95070-3202 MAIER THOMAS B & KATHERINE A TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19797 VIEWRIDGE DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3236 UCHIMOTO WARREN TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19808 VIEWRIDGE DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3205 WANG KUANG-YU & DREAN L orCurrent Owner 19772 VIEWRIDGE DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3205 ANTONELLI DEAN D & LUCILLE M TRUSTEE orCurrent Owner 19799 OAKHAVEN DR SARATOGA, CA 95070-3213 orCurrent Owner ®0~1'~ ,~n9ls ~A?J3/1t/ 1`x/1 Aa3AV-O~-008-L ~~ ®09t5 31V1dW31 ~eAV ~f1 wee tiawew~N-N- ~ 6upu~ eai~ wed • Attachment 3 • ®~®~~.8 i ' ' Page 1 of 1 From: Jacqueline Cathcart [merrymaga@msn.com] Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 8:38 PM To: Ann Welsh Subject: Church of Ascension sign Dear Anne Welsh, I live on Ladera Court - -a couple of streets in from Prospect. I have no objection to a new tasteful sign for the Church of Ascension. The church has been there for over 37 years or so and probably needs a new sign, although most people have no trouble locating it. I do urge the council or commission to consider the entrance to the development when approving the sign; seven feet high seems a bit much and I don't know what they mean by "illuminated." Already as you enter from Prospect at night, the lights around the new office building look a bit like a gas station. I hope they mean illuminated softly, not neon or ??? When I view the council meetings on council seem to have high standards I am relying on their judgment. television, the commission and about what is done in Saratoga. NOTE: Please do not distribute my e-mail to o hers outside of planning commission. Sincerely, Jacqueline Cathcart Saratoga, CA 95070 merrymaga~msn.com Nurture Through Nature xxoo 19645 Ladera Ct. the ~~'®~~.~ file://P:\Ann\Diocese%20of%20San%20Jose%20-%20Sign%20Permit\Church%20o1%20... 11 /4/2004 • • • 0 N w Q O U `o 3 m ~ ~ o ~ r ~ ~ yy V] G N S pp OD ~ .N ~ ;O y ~ '~~~ S ~s.~M a O ~ N ~o C a U .-• ~ `~ "~; (~:-~ .~, [i ~~ a a O V1 N M .b Uy~i ~~. Q U Qr u d N U Center line Miller Ave. 0 N ~D N~~;~ k~ 00 .. ~ O+D ~ O .~ C ~ W O "v p x~ ~~ ~~ .y .Y ~ .I' to U "-' 0 zH 8' 6" Planter and sidewalk 0 O ~o ~o b u ?~ N N b m ' U 0 N 1 ~' .~ (] i ~~ 4•. ... ~, _~ ~ rn U M O C~1 ~ Z U N V1 • i:• ^ ~~: r t ~ ~ J ~ ` W f 4 t a ~n ~._,. - - - W JI VI ul V! V!. 11! ~~ a' id ~ J N io is i i. .. ~' .~ _ ~ ti r. !~ , , u~t ~ , I,~ 1~ n u, ~ , ( ., ~., .. ~ ~ j ~ " f 'V i,i G ~ 1 i u! 1 ! c: .. __ „ U %~ ~ • ~ V t •1 •'J "J ~ •! ~^ ., 14, i ; u: t t r . r; n..c, ~~i r, ; :~ u u. u. .. 1.1 # ; , ~ f l0 ! 'y u ~ ~~ 1 L1. it t~ :~ ~ rolL at ~o n ~ ;:i, `3 „ ~ 0 { 1 v~ p ~ ~ a~i `~ O y ~ ~ `~ ~ ~n K ~ ~^ rn ~/, ~ ~ U b ~1 ~ ~ H W ~ ci ~ ~- i ~I / ~ ~ ~~. ..Y_ . • :p ~5ct!~li. tel..:... .. .~,.. ... • ~ , ~t ¢ _o N v F• i ~ ' ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~, ~: ~~- ~ of ~- , `~ U O i- ( U !.. y=;4, J:i !.! is ii ~S t., ~: <-, f t tl~ (u ti'i ~i '~ ;, iU ~' ~~ ~. .~ • F I li ( m 6 ~ ~:, JI U V, t 1':~Ti ' '!1 ~_ " •_ i! i'i __ N iy Fi Y _!V '}; • Item 3A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • Application No./Location: 04-128/ 13089 Quito Road -Lot 1 Applicant/Owner: Salim Sagazchi Staff Planner: Ann Welsh, AICP, Associate Planner Date: November 10, 2004 APN: 389-14-37 Department H - - 0 500 ftradius -ADC - 13089 Quito Road 500 ft parcels UIT 9AYL 11'O RD 1 ~' Q I~O Ft ITO AV AV AV ..1 ___ _ ~-C - 0 100 200 300 400 500 ft~ • 13089 Quito Road -Lot 1 # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot 1 13089 Quito Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY Application filed: Application complete Notice published: Mailing completed: Posting completed: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 5/6/04 10/15/04 10/27/04 10/26/04 10/15/04 This Design Review application is a request to construct atwo-story structure on a 12,095 square foot lot located in the R-1,10,000 zoning district on the corner of the proposed cul-de-sac, Dorcich Court and Martha Avenue. The home is designed in a neo-craftsman style with lap siding, lightweight concrete brown the roof. The home is located within a new subdivision that was the former site of the Dorcich Orchard. The home is intended to be compatible architecturally with the historic farmhouse that is retained on lot five of the subdivision. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Design Review application with conditions by adopting the Resolution for Application # 04-128. ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft Resolution 2. Key Plan Map 3. Arborist Report dated June 2, 2004. 4. Fire Department report dated June 16, 200 5. Affidavit of Mailing 6. Neighborhood Correspondence 7. Plans, Exhibit "A" r~ • C7 ®~®~'~~ # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot 1 13089 Quito Road STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R-1,10,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: M-10 -Medium Density Residential MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE:12,095 square feet AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: Average Slope of the lot is less than 10%. GRADING REQUIRED: No grading of the site is proposed. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed project consisting of a slrigle-family residence is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-family residences. The project site is in an urbanized area and is connected to utility and roadway infrastructure. MATERIALS AND COLORS PROPOSED: The house is to be tan lap siding with brown roof tiles. • ~~DO®C~3 # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot 1 13089 Quito Road LOT SIZE LOT COVERAGE Building Footprint Walkways, Patio &t Driveway TOTAL FLOOR AREA Main Floor Second Floor TOTAL SETBACKS Front Rear Interior Side Exterior Side Height Residence PROPOSED 12,095 sQ. FT. 30%. 2,187 sQ. FT. 1,326 sQ. F•r. 3,513 sQ. i~ r. 2,187 sQ. Fr. 1,330 sQ. FT. 3,517 sQ. Fr. 43 FT. 25 i;r. 1ST FL-10 FT. 9 IN. 2ND FL-30 FT. 9 IN. ' 1ST FL - 29 FT. 1 IN. 2ND FL - 44 FT. 9 IN. 25 Fr. CODE REQUIREMENTS 12,000 sQ. FT. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE 60% 7,257 sQ. Fr. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE 3,710 sQ. Fr. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT 25 Fr. 1ST FL ~ 2ND FL. 10 FT. 1ST FL -10 FT. 2ND FL-15 FT. 1ST FL - 25 FT. 2ND FL - 30 FT. 26 Fr. •i • 4 ~~0~~~ # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot I 13089 Quito Road PROJECT DISCUSSION Design Review This Design Review application for Lot 1 involves review of a two story home with a design that is based somewhat on the Craftsman style which is typified in the Historic Mitchell house that is to be relocated from the center of the parcel onto Lot 5. The elevations depict a home with lap siding and lightweight concrete tiles that resemble slate shingles. In terms of the front facade, a low profile front entry with porch overhang is proposed. The entry door has nine divided lights in the upper half of the door. Sidelights and transom lights complete the door surround. The first floor front windows also have multi-pane sashes above the larger windowpane, which is typical of the Craftsman style. The plans propose lattice detailing below the upper eave, which reflects similar detail in the original Mitchell House. The design of the house has some of the detailing that is typically associated with Craftsman style dwellings but the character of the house would be enhanced with additional details that reflect the Craftsman style. The use of exposed rafter beams at the eaves and river rock facing of porch columns, which taper from the base to the top, is suggested to add additional texture and depth to the facade. The garage door should also reflect the Craftsman theme of the subdivision ~th multiple pane divided lights in the upper panel of the door. These details in the design of the house are recommended by staff in order to enhance the character f the development. The site plan proposes four drywells to minimize storm water runoff in response to the site design regulations mandated by the Santa Clara Watershed C-3 Permit issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Necessary Findings The Zoning Ordinance, Section 15-45.080 identifies the following findings as necessary for granting Design Review approval. (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. (b) Preserve natural landscape. (c) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. (d) Compatible bulk and height. (e) Employs current grading and erosion control methods. (f) Utilizes Residential Design Guide policies and techniques. Actual Findings The following findings have been made regarding the proposed new construction. • ~~~~~5 # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot 1 13069 Quito Road , (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privary. The height, elevations andplacement on the site of theproposed main or accessory structure, when considered with reference to: (i) the nature and location of residential structures on adjacent lots and within the neighborhoods; and (ii) community view sheds will avoid unreasonable interference with views and privary. The proposed two-story dwelling will not interfere unreasonably with views and privacy. The home is located on a corner lot and is centered on the lot such that the setbacks proposed exceed the minimum requirements. The zoning ordinance allows a 10-foot rear yard setback while the plans depict a 25-foot rear yard setback. The exterior side yard setback also exceeds the minimum allowable. The two-story design of the structure allows the impervious coverage to be minimized and furthers the mandate of the Regional Water Quality Control Board to minimize storm water runoff and decrease impervious coverage. If the home were single story, the impervious coverage would be greater and the on-site water retention would be more difficult to achieve. Moreover, the immediately adjacent neighbors indicate support for the two stories dwelling adjacent their property. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. The natural landscape will be preserved insofar as practicable by designing structures to follow the natural contours of the site and minimizing tree and soil removal; grade changes will be minimized and will be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed areas and undeveloped areas. The plan proposes to retain the existing topography and minimal grading is proposed. Development on this lot would impact 8 trees, one of which is in conflict with the location of the house and another, which is dead. Retaining six trees on this lot reIlects sensitivity to the design guideline of preserving the natural landscape. (c) Minimize perception of excessive bulb. The proposed main or accessory structure in relation to structures on adjacent lots and to the surrounding region will minimize the perception of excessive bulk and will be integrated into the enrvironment. The design does not depict excessive bulk. Although a second story is proposed, the area of the second Iloor in relation to the first Iloor is proportional and the varying roofline serves to minim~e the perception of bulk. The added design details recommended in the project discussion would also serve to vary the facade, add texture to the front facade and minimize the perception of bulk. (d) Compatible bulk and height. The proposed main or accessory structure will be compatible in terms of bulk and height with (I) existing residential structures on adjacent lots and those within the immediate neighborhood and within the same zoning district; and (ii) the natural environment; and shall not (iii) unreasonably impair the light and air of adjacent properties to utilize solar energy. '~~~'~~~ # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot 1 13089 Quito Road The proposed two-story home is located in a neighborhood that is predominantly single story in character. However, the existing historic Mitchell house, which is the design inspiration for the proposed home, is a two-story structure and the Lot 1 design reflects this style. (e) Current grading and erosion control methods. The proposed site development or grading plan incorporates rurrentgrading and erosion control standards used by the City. The proposed design retains the natural topography since changes to the grade surrounding the house are minimal. Also the plan reflects the mandate by the Regional Quality Control Board to limit impervious coverage and storm water runoff. The proposed drywells are designed to slow runoff and retain the first flush of storm water. (~ Design policies and techniques. The proposed home will conform to each of the applicable design policies and techniques set forth in the Residential Design Handbook The above analysis supports the conclusion that the findings required for granting design review approval can be met provided the applicant carries out the conditions outlined in the resolution of approval. The City Arborist and the Santa Clara County Fire District have reviewed this application. Their comments are included as condition of approval. • ~r~®~~~ # 04-128 /Design Review - IAt 1 13089 Quito Road , Neighborhood Input Resolution #03-049, which granted tentative subdivision approval of this lot, required that the applicant hold a meeting with the surrounding neighbors to obtain a consensus on the design of the homes within the subdivision. Attachment # 5, which is included in this staff report, contains the notices that were signed by the surrounding neighbors. The map below depicts those parcels that approved the design of the proposed homes. As can be seen from the map, neighbors who did not object to the proposed two-story design of the home surround Lot 1. ., ~. • ~~®®~8 # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot 1 13089 Quito Road • Community Development The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A", New House- Lot 1, Salim Sagarchi, Dorcich Orchard, 13089 Quito Road, Saratoga prepared by Keith Royster, Architect, dated 2/10/03, date stamped 10/28/2004. The conditions of approval identified in this report shall be incorporated into the revised plans. 1. The design shall be revised to enhance the architectural detailing in the facade and reflect Craftsman style azchitecture. Exposed rafter beams at the eaves and river rock facing of porch columns is required to meet the design review guidelines. In order to support this design the porch columns should taper from the base to the top to add additional texture and depth to the facade. The garage door should continue the Craftsman theme of the subdivision with multiple pane divided lights in the upper panel of the door. These details in the design of the house are required in order to enhance the character of the development. 2. Four sets of complete construction plans incorporating required revisions and this Resolution on a separate plan page shall be submitted to the Building Division. 3. The landscape plan shall be installed prior to granting final planning approval of the project. 4. Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that aze tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any handscaped area. 6. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. 7. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. 8. Proper maintenance of landscaping, with minimal pesticide use, shall be the responsibility of the property owner. 9. The site plan shall be stamped and signed by a Licensed Land Surveyor who verifies the accuracy of the boundaries. ':~~®~~9 # 04-128 /Design Review - lot 1 13089 Quito Road 10. Prior to pouring of foundation, the setbacks identified in the approved plans shall be verified by a licensed land surveyor. This verification shall be documented by a signed and sealed statement from the Surveyor. This statement shall be submitted to the building inspector prior to pouring foundation. 11. The applicant shall install asix-foot high wooden fence at the rear and interior side property line in order to maintain the privacy of the abutting rear neighbor. 12. The plan data on sheet SP-1 shall be revised to correct the impervious coverage ratio. The impervious coverage is 30% as per the submitted data. Fire Protection District The Santa Clara County Fire District reviewed this application on May, 25, 2004 and their requirements are included as conditions of approval: 1. Required Fire flow: the fire flow for this project is 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. The required fire flow is available from area water mains and fire hydrants(s), which are spaced at the required spacing. 2. Public Fire Hydrant Required: Provide 1 public fire hydrant at locations to be determined by the fire department and the San Jose Water Company. Hydrants shall have a minimum single flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual with spacing not to exceed S00 feet. 3. Timing of required water supply installations: Installat ns of required fire service and fire hydrants shall be tested and accepted by the F' a Department prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested and accepted. 4. Garage Fire Sprinkler Required: An approved automatic fire sprinkler system designed per National Fire Protection Association Standard #13D and local ordinances, shall be provided for the garage. To ensure proper sprinkler operation, the garage shall have a smooth, flat, horizontal ceiling. A state of California licensed fire protection contractor shall submit three sets of plans, calculations, a complete permit application and appropriate fees to this department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. 5. Fire Apparatus Access Roads Required: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15%. Installations shall conform with Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications. • to ~~®~~®. # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot 1 13089 Quito Road CityArborist Report The City Arborist reviewed this project and prepared a report dated June 2, 2004. The recommendations of this report are included as conditions of approval. 1. Per Ciry Ordinance, a bond equal to 100% of the appraised valuer of trees planned for retention (#1, 3, 5, 6, 41 and 42) is required to promote their protection. Their combined value is determined to be $34,812. 2. The September 11, 2002 arborist report identifies 36 fruit trees of Ordinance size scattered throughout the property. Many are dead while the others appear in overall poor condition. For this reason, their removal is appropriate and mitigation is not suggested. The below recommendations are intended to be used in conjunction with those presented in the September 11, 2002 report. 4. Tree protective fencing shall be installed precisely as shown on the attached map and established prior to any demolition, grading, surface scraping, construction or heavy equipment arriving on site. It shall be comprised of five- to six-foot high chain link mounted on two-inch diameter, galvanized steel posts, driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 12 feet apart. Once e tablished, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout th construction process until final inspection. S. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the fenced areas (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: grading, surface scraping, trenching, storage and dumping of materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 6. The surveyed locations of tree trunks #2, 40 and 41 must be shown on all future site, grading and drainage, and landscape plans submitted to the City. 7. Plans showing grading and drainage, landscape (revised showing planting and irrigation), and underground utilities shall be reviewed by the City for tree impacts. 8. All underground utilities (i.e. water, gas, sewer, electrical) and drainage features (such as drain lines, swales and dissipaters) should be designed outside from beneath canopies of retained trees; I should be consulted if this is not feasible. 9. Supplemental water shall be supplied every two weeks to each retained tree during the months of April thru November. This should begin at the start of grading and continue through construction. I recommend a rate of 10 gallons per inch of trunk ~~®Q~~.1 11 # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot 1 13089 Quito Road , diameter applied using soaker hoses placed on the soil surface beneath the mid- to outer-canopies. 10. The proposed irrigation design must be revised to ensure no trenches are designed within 10 times the trunk diameter of trees being retained. Where this is not feasible, the irrigation system must be adrip-type system placed on top of existing soil grade. 11. Irrigation spray should reach no closer than three feet from a tree's trunk (including those of newly installed trees). All forms of irrigation for new trees must be of adrip- type system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. 12. Lawn or other plant material requiring frequent watering must comprise no more than 20-percent of the area beneath a tree's canopy. All other plant material should be drought tolerant. 13. Mulch, stones or other landscape features must be placed no closer than one-foot from the trees' trunks. Bender board should not be installed and tilling of the soil should not occur within 10 times the diameter of the nearest trunk. 14. The boulders proposed for placement beneath tree #6's canopy shall be removed from the design. 15. Herbicides should not be used beneath tree canopies. Where used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. 16. The removal and pruning of trees must be performed under the supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. Information regarding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained by referring to the following website: http://www.isa-arborcom/arborists/arbsearchhtml. 17. Remove tree #4. The proposed removal of tree #2 should be mitigated by installing new trees on site that are equivalent to its appraised value of $1,145. The replacement values are shown on the bottom of the table attached to the 9/1U02 report. Acceptable replacement species include ~uercus agrifolia, 2uercus lobata, 2uercus helloggii, 2uercus douglasii, 2uercus dumosa, Acer macrophyllum, Aesculus californica, Pseudotsuga menziesii and Sequoia sempervirens. The replacement species, location and size should be shown on future planting plan(s). • ~~'®®~~ lz # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot 1 13089 Quito Road Conclusion The proposed residence is designed to conform to the policies set forth in the City's Residential Design Handbook and to satisfy all of the findings required within Section 15- 45.080 of the City Code if developed with the recommended conditions. The residence will not interfere with views or privacy, preserves the natural landscape and will minimize the perception of bulk. The proposal if developed with conditions and revisions, will satisfy all other zoning regulations in terms of allowable floor area, setbacks, maximum height and impervious coverage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Design Review application with conditions by adopting the Resolution for Application # 04-128. • ~~0~1~ 13 r~ Attachment 1 • ~~~®~.~ • RESOLUTION N0.04- APPLICATION N0.04-128 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sagarchi/ 13089 Quito Road -Lot 1 • WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review approval to construct a 3,517 square foot two story home on Lot 1, a 12,095 square foot corner lot in the recently approved Dorcich Orchard subdivision. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and Whereas the project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303„ "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of e Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construe ion or conversion of up to three single-family residences. The site is in an urba 'zed area and is connected to utility and roadway infrastructure and involve the construction of one single family home ;and WHEREAS, the applicant has support said application for Design findings have been determined: met the burden of proof required to Review approval, and the following Policy 1, Minimise the perception of bulk The design uses architectural features to break up massing. The house is two story with a cross gabled roof which reduces the mass of the roofline. Fenestration along the lower front facade includes elongated windows with multiple panes in the upper transom and large panes in the lower portion of the sash. The covered, porch with simple front door with sidelights and transom is low profile in design and proportion. Policy 2, Integrate structures with the environment The design preserves the natural landscape, since the plan proposes to retain the existing topography and minimal grading is proposed. Development on this lot would impact 8 trees, one of which is in conflict with the location of the house ®~~1~~:y and another, which is dead. Retaining six protected size trees on this lot reflects sensitivity to the design guideline of preserving the natural landscape. Policy 3, Avoid interference with privacy The orientation of the house controls view to adjacent properties. Those portions of the house, which contain outdoor living space, aze oriented toward the reaz of the house. The house is designed to reduce noise impacts on adjacent dwellings. The garage is located towazd the front of the property with access from the cul- de-sac. Policy 4, Preserve views and access to views The proposed two-story dwelling will not interfere unreasonably with views and privacy. The home is located on a corner lot and is centered on the lot such that the setbacks proposed exceed the minimum requirements. The zoning ordinance allows a 10-foot reaz yard setback while the plans depict a 25-foot rear yazd setback. The exterior side yard setback also exceeds the minimum allowable. A privacy fence is to be installed at the rear of the property and existing trees are to be retained and protected so that the existing mature trees will be retained and continue to provide the view of mature landscaping. Policy 5, Design for maximum benefit of sun and wind The location of the house does not block the sun of any neighbors smce additional setback is provided. The mature trees to be retained provide shade and wind block therefore the design maximizes existing landscaping and does not interfere with the solaz access of neighbors. Now, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the Ciry of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the application by for Design Review approval is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A", New House- Lot 1, Salem Saatchi, Doric Orchard, 13089 Quito Road, Saratoga prepared by Keith Roister, Architect, dated 2/10/03, date stamped 10/28/2004. The conditions of approval. identified in this report shall be incorporated into the revised plans. 1. The design shall be revised to enhance the architectural detailing in the fa~.ade and reflect Craftsman style architecture. Exposed rafter beams at the eaves and river rock facing of porch columns is required to meet the design review ~~~~. guidelines. In order to support this design the porch columns should taper from the base to the top to add additional texture and depth to the facade. The garage door should continue the Craftsman theme of the subdivision with multiple pane divided lights in the upper panel of the door. These details in the design of the house are required in order to enhance the character of the development. 2. Four sets of complete construction plans incorporating required revisions and this Resolution on a separate plan page shall be submitted to the Building Division. 3. The landscape plan shall be installed prior to granting final planning approval of the project. 4. Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. S. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hadscaped area. 6. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to sits specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and g of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishmen . 7. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cov r shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. 8. Proper maintenance of landscaping, with minimal pesticide Use, shall be the responsibility of the property owner. 9. The site plan shall be stamped and signed by a Licensed Land Surveyor who verifies the accuracy of the boundaries. 10. Prior to pouring of foundation, the setbacks identified in the approved plans shall be verified by a licensed land surveyor. This verification shall be documented by a signed and sealed statement from the Surveyor. This statement shall be submitted to the building inspector prior to pouring foundation. 11. The applicant shall install asix-foot high wooden fence at the rear and interior side property line in order to maintain the privacy of the abutting rear neighbor. 12. The plan data on sheet SP-1 shall be revised to correct the impervious coverage ratio. The impervious coverage is 30% as per the submitted data. ~~~®~.~ Fire Protection District The Santa Clara County Fire District reviewed this application on May 25, 2004 and their requirements are included as conditions of approval: 1. Required Fire Ilow: the fire Ilow for this project is 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. The required fire Ilow is available from area water mains and fire hydrants(s), which are spaced at the required spacing. 2. Public Fire Hydrant Required: Provide 1 public fire hydrant at locations to be determined by the fire department and the San Jose Water Company. Hydrants shall have a minimum single Ilow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual with spacing not to exceed 500 feet. Timing of required water supply installations: Installations of required fire service and fire hydrants shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested and accepted. 4. Garage Fire Sprinkler Required: An approved automatic fire sprinkler system designed per National Fire Protection Association Standard #13D and local ordinances, shall be provided for the garage. To ensure proper sprinkler operation, the garage shall have a smooth, Ilat, horizontal ceiling. A state of California licensed fire protection contractor shall submit three sets of plans, calculations, a complete permit application and appropriate fees to this department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. 5. Fire Apparatus Access Roads Required: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15%. Installations shall conform with Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications. CityArborist Report The City Arborist reviewed this project and prepared a report dated June 2, 2004. The recommendations of this report are included as conditions of approval. Per City Ordinance, a bond equal to 100% of the appraised valuez of trees planned for retention (#1, 3, S, 6, 41 and 42) is required to promote their protection. Their combined value is determined to be $34,812. 2. The September 11, 2002 arborist report identifies 36 fruit trees of Ordinance size scattered throughout the property. Many are dead while the others appear in overall poor condition. For this reason, their removal is appropriate and mitigation is not suggested. 3. The below recommendations are intended to be used in conjunction with those presented in the September 11, 2002 report. 4. Tree protective fencing shall be installed precisely as shown on the attached map and established prior to any demolition, grading, surface scraping, construction or heavy equipment arriving on site. It shall be comprised of five- to six-foot high chain link mounted on two-inch diameter, galvanized steel posts, driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 12 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the fenced areas (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: grading, surface scraping, trenching, storage and dumping of materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 6. The surveyed locations of tree trunks #2, 40 and 41 must be shown on all future site, grading and drainage, and landscape plans submitted to the City. 7. Plans showing grading and drainage, landscape (revised showing planting and irrigation), and underground utilities shall be reviewed by the City for tree impacts. 8. All underground utilities (i.e. water, gas, sewer, electrical) and drainage features (such as drain lines, swales and dissipaters) should be designed outside from beneath canopies of retained trees; I should be consulted if this is not feasible. 9. Supplemental water shall be supplied every two weeks to each retained tree during the months of April thru November. This should begin at the start of grading and continue through construction. I recommend a rate of 10 gallons per inch of trunk diameter applied using soaker hoses placed on the soil surface beneath the mid- to outer-canopies. 10. The proposed irrigation design must be revised to ensure no trenches are designed within 10 times the trunk diameter of trees being retained. Where this is not feasible, the irrigation system must be adrip-type system placed on top of existing soil grade. 11. Irrigation spray should reach no closer than three feet from a tree's trunk (including those of newly installed trees). All forms of irrigation for new trees must be of a drip-type system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. ~~®®~.~ 12. Lawn or other plant material requiring frequent watering must comprise no more than 20-percent of the area beneath a tree's canopy. All other plant material should be drought tolerant. 13. Mulch, stones or other landscape features must be placed no closer than one- foot from the trees' trunks. Bender board should not be installed and tilling of the soil should not occur within 10 times the diameter of the nearest trunk. 14. The boulders proposed for placement beneath tree #6's canopy should be removed from the design. 15. Herbicides should not be used beneath tree canopies. Where used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. 16. The removal and pruning of trees must be performed under the supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. Information regarding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained by referring to the following website: http://www.isa- arbor.com/arborists/arbsearchhtml. 17. Remove tree #4. The proposed removal of tree #2 should be mitigated by installing new trees on site that are equivalent to its appraised value of $1,145. The replacement values are shown on the bottom of the table attached to the 9/1U02 report. Acceptable replacement species include 2uercus agrifolia, 2uercus lobata, 2uercus helloggii, ~uercus douglasii, 2uercus dumosa, Acer macrophyllum, Aesculus californica, Pseudotsuga men2iesii and Sequoia sempervirens. The replacement species, location and size should be shown on future planting plan(s). CITY ATTORNEY 1. Applicant agrees to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. 2. Noncompliance with any of the conditions of this permit shall constitute a violation of the permit. Because it is impossible to estimate damages the City could incur due to the violation, liquidated damages of $250 shall be payable to this City per each day of the violation. Section 2. Construction must be commenced within 36 months or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. ~~®~2~ Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15-90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 10`h day of November 2004 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date • '~~~~2~. Attachment 2 • ~~®~2~ ~, ~ ~~~~- .... _ ~ i ~i e .;' ~. KEY PLAN ~~~~2~ • Attachment 3 • ~~~~~~ " ouRCES ~ ARBO REs Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care A TREE INVENTORY AND REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED NEW RESIDENCE AT 13089 QUITO ROAD -LOT 1 SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA OWNER'S NAME: SAGARCHI APPLICATION #: 04-128 APN #: 389-014-037 Submitted to: I Community Development Departm ~ t City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue '~ Saratoga, CA 95070 Prepared by: David L. Babby, RCA Registered Consulting Arborist #399 Certified Arborist #WE-4001A June 2, 2004 P.O. Box 25295, San Mateo, California 94402 • Email: arborresources@earthlink.net Phone: 650.654.3351 • Fax: 650.654.3352 • Licensed Contractor #796763 ~Q`~ ©~~ David L. Bab Re istered Co~ i»g Arborist • June 2, 2004 bY. 8 SUMMARY • The proposed project on this lot would impact eight trees of Ordinance size (#1-6, 41 and 42). They include one Coast Live Oak (# 1), four Coast Redwoods (#4-6, 41), one Fig (#2), one Douglas Fir (#3) and one Deodar Cedar (#42). All but #2, 41 and 42 are shown on plans reviewed. Tree #2 is in conflict with the proposed home and would be removed. Its removal is appropriate for this project and replacements equivalent to its appraised value are suggested. Tree #4 is dead and should be removed regardless of the proposed project. No replacements are suggested. Measures presented in the `Recommendations' section of this report must be carefully followed and incorporated into construction plans. Per City Ordinance, a bond equal to 100% of the appraised value of trees planned for retention (#1, 3, 5, 6, 41 and 42) is required to promote their protection. Their combined value is determined to be $34,812. INTRODUCTION • The City of Saratoga Community Development Department has requested I review the potential tree impacts associated with constructing asingle-family residence on a vacant lot at 13089 Quito Road -Lot 1, Saratoga. This report presents my findings and recommendations. Infonmation regarding trees on this lot is presented within the table attached to the City Arborist report dated September 11, 2002. Metal tags containing numbers corresponding to those presented within this report were found attached to each accessible trunk. Plans reviewed for this report include Sheets T-1, SP-0, SP-1 and A-1.4 (by Keith Royster Architects, dated 2/10/03) and Sheet L-2 (by Creative Horticulture, dated 04/04). The trees' locations, numbers and canopy perimeters are presented on an attached copy of Sheet SP-1 (Site Plan). Trees #2, 40 and 41 are not shown on plans reviewed. Their trunk locations have been added to the attached map and should not be construed as being surveyed. ' The appraised tree values shown on the attached Tree Inventory Table are calculated in accordance with the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9`'' Edition, published by the International Society of Arboricultwe, 2000. Sagarchi Property, 13089 Quito Road -Lot 1, Saratoga Page 1 of 3 City of Saratoga Community Development Department ~~~~~~ . Babb Re istered Coting Arborist ~ June 2, 2004 Dav1d L y, S The September 11, 2002 azborist report identifies 36 fruit trees of Ordinance size scattered throu out the roperty. Many aze dead while the others appeaz in overall poor condition. 8h P For this reason, their removal is appropriate and mitigation is not suggested. Please note I am unable to fully determine how many of these trees would be removed from this lot due to their high number as well as the lot boundaries not being seen. RECOMMENDATIONS The below recommendations aze intended to be used in conjunction with those presented in the September 11, 2002 report. 1. Tree protective fencing shall be installed precisely as shown on the attached map and established prior to any demolition, grading, surface scraping, construction or heavy equipment arriving on site. It shall be comprised of five- to six-foot high chain link mounted on two-inch diameter, galvanized steel posts, driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 12 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. 2. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the fenced areas (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: grading, surface scraping, trenching, storage and dumping of materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 3. I recommend protective fencing remain installed throughout the landscape installation phase. Small openings can be created immediately before landscape construction begins to allow for foot traffic and wheelbarrow access only. 4. The surveyed locations of tree trunks #2, 40 and 4ltmust be shown on all future site, grading and drainage, and landscape plans bus miffed to the City. 5. Upon being available, plans showing grading and drainage, landscape (revised showing planting and irrigation), and underground utilities shall be reviewed by the City for tree impacts. 6. All underground utilities (i.e. water, gas, sewer, electrical) and drainage features (such as drain lines, swales and dissipaters) should be designed outside from beneath canopies of retained trees; I should be consulted if this is not feasible. 7. Supplemental water shall be supplied every two weeks to each retained tree during the months of April thru November. This should begin at the start of grading and continue through construction. I recommend a rate of 10 gallons per inch of trunk diameter applied using soaker hoses placed on the soil surface beneath the mid- to outer- canopies. Sagarchi Property, 13089 Quito Road -Lot 1, Saratoga City of Saratoga Community Development Department Page 2 of 3 ~~~~~~ • David L. Bab ,Registered Consulting Arborist • June 2, 2004 by All existing underground pipes and irrigation lines beneath the canopies of retained trees should remain buried and be cut off at existing soil grade. 9. The proposed.~rrigation desi must be revised to ensure no trenches are designed ~r within 10 tunes a er of trees mg re ~ ere this is not feasible, v~ the irrigation system must be adrip-type system pl on top of existing soil grade. 10. Irrigation spray should reach no closer than three feet from a tree's trunk (including those of newly installed trees). All forms of irrigation for new trees must be of adrip- type system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. 11. Lawn or other plant material requiring frequent watering must comprise no more than 20-percent of the area beneath a tree's canopy. All other plant material should be drought tolerant. 12. Mulch, stones or other landscape features must be placed no closer than one-foot from the trees' trunks. Bender board should not be installed and tilling of the soil should not occur within 10 times the diameter of the nearest trunk. 13.I recommend the boulders proposed for placement beneath tree #6's canopy removed from a esign. .I 14. Herbicides should not be used beneath tree canopies. Wh ' used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. 15. The removal and pruning of trees must be performed der the supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Ar rist and according to ISA standards. Information regarding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained by referring to the following website: http: //www. isa-arbor. com/arborists/arbsearch html. 16. Remove tree #4. The proposed removal of tree #2 should be mitigated by installing new trees on site that are equivalent to its appraised value of $1,145. The replacement values are shown on the bottom of the table attached to the 9/11/02 report. Acceptable replacement species include Quercus agrifolia, Quercus lobata, Quercus kelloggii, Quercus douglasii, Quercus dumosa, Acer macrophyllum, Aesculus californica, Pseudotsuga menziesii and Sequoia sempervirens. The replacement species, location and size should be shown on future planting plan(s). Attachment: Site Map (Copy of Sheet SP-1) • Sagarchi Property, 13089 Quito Road -Lot 1, Saratoga City of Saratoga Community Development Department Page 3 of 3 ~~~'~~~ • '~~ : 17069 Quiro rt°.d - t.a 1. sv.wp - - - -~ I I ~,(g: Cily otSwobe CaenHniry De`elopncnl 1 '- ( 0 4 ~' ~ , _ . - - . - , Olga. Mep idmMio ryM uea orOrdinrice sia. - . , - ' - . - . _ C~~oPY perimelen ve ~ppwimMe. Map hu bees «dnttdm ax rdu not ro cede. i ~: June i, zoos ? I 5 11 ,~ I • I I ~ I 42 ~ ~ 'l~ 888 sF I I I ~ i I l I ~ ... ~S'-0' ~ 1 I ~, ~ I I % LOT 1 I I I ,~' PAD 8764 I ,~~~~ I I ~' ~, I ~2oos gar 61F. ' I 1 l // I ~ _ ` \~ 43,-0• I I ;I I / ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~' ~ I __, I ~° E'''D I I I ~ I _ j r L-- -f~ - --~ - ~~/ ~ ~Eh~ .vE ~ / ~, I 1 ~ ~ - \. yI ~' /,^------ ~ SAVE ~ /• / / - _ ~ ~ _ N 88°00'3 95_00' ... , ... ,'- -.~.-L+ ~ ~ ~ _ . . / i E 3 PROTECTIVE FENCING __=~-.J. . ~. -' _- .~ '~ ,`~~ 6 14'PINE i~ `~~ SAVE `~~~~~ / ~~ .\ ~~ / ~ \ ~-~~/ ~~ i' ~' i',/ '~ P"Pied BY` MARTHA A V ARBOR RESOURCES ~i' r. ~ „roe°r ~.e°nr.r,..°r c°°,.m°6 h r.., r°.. i i I.O. Bm iSA! bin ea,e°, CA 9uoi Phwr: Ie.W16347331 Ewril:~Np,ew~aYn~onMink.np 'LAN LOT 1 ~~~` y~~~ N • Attachment 4 • ~~~'~~~~ . /' FIRE DEPARTMENT SANTA CLARA COUNTY 14700 Winchester Blvd., Los Gatos, CA 95032-1818 (408) 378-4010 • (408) 378-9342 (fax) • www.sccfd.org 04 1080 PLAN REVIEW NUMBER BLDG PERMR NUMBER CONTROL NUMBER FE.E NUMBER 04-128 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS CODFJBEC. ~ 8HEET ~ NO. ~ REQUIREMENT ~pc II-A ~dix SP-0 Review of a proposed 3,516 square foot single family residence with an attached garage. This review covers Lot #1. 12 Review of this Developmental proposal is limited to acceptability of site access and water supply as they pertain to fire department operations, and shall not be construed as a substitute for formal plan review to determine compliance with adopted model codes. Prior to performing any work the applicant shall make application to, and receive from, the Building Department all applicable construction permits. It is noted that the Site Plan does not appear to match the scale shown. I i I It is noted that the proposed new street will be identified as Dorcich Court. Please reflect that street name on all future applications. Riquired Fire Flow: The fire flow for this project is 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. The required fire flow is available from area water mains and fire hydrant(s) which are spaced at the required spacing. CMy PLANS SPECS NEW RMDL AS OCCUPANCY CONST.TYPE AppllpMWm~ DATE PAGE STG ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ KEITH ROYSTER ARCHITECTS 5/25/2004 1 of 3 OOR AREA LOAD DESCRIPTION Residential Construction ~ Hokanson, Wayne NAME OF PROJECT """" ""' SFR- SARGACHI 13089 Quito Rd Organized as the Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District Serving Santa Clara County and the communities of Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos, ~~~~•~~ Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, and Saratoga C7 Attachment 5 • ~~~~~ . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ~/ ~ bein dul sworn de oses and sa s: that I am a I, ~-- g Y ~ P Y citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years~tj~hat acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the a~ ~ day of ~~C~~~~ 2004, that I deposited in the United States Post Office within Santa Clara County, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to-wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15-45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property to be affected by the application; that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. ~, ~~ - ,~ Signed • ~~'~~~~ • NOTICE OF HEARING BEFORE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF SARATOGA'S PLANNING COMMISSION announces the following public hearing on Wednesday, the 10th day of November at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, which are located in the Civic Theater at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Project details and plans are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Thursday, 7:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. If you have questions, on the project please direct them to Ann Welsh, Associate Planner, awelsh@saratoga.ca.us or 408-868-1230. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and ' ce. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a public hearing in court, you y be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) descri din this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Saratoga Planning Commission at, or p ' r to, the public hearing. In order to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, writt communications should be filed on or before the Tuesday, a week before the meeting. APPLICATIONS #04-128,129,130, 131 & 132 (389-14-37) SAGARCHI,13089 Quito Road - The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct five single family homes on the site of the former Dorcich Orchard which was approved for a six lot subdivision on 11/12/03. The proposed homes are designed to be compatible with the style of the historic farmhouse, which is being moved and restored on Lot 5. The homes are two story structures with a maximum height of 25 feet 6 inches. The floor area of the homes range in size from 3,366 square feet to 3,517 square feet. The property is in the R-1, 10,000 zoning district. The landscaping and Quito Road sound wall are also the subject of review. ~~~$~.j` • In CG f~ O O O r- N M ~ l1) c0 I~ 00 O O ~ OJ f~ 00 O O ~ N M ~ ~ <O ~ to <O f~ 00 C1 O r- M M M M M~ ~ '~t d' ~~~~ d' '~ O O O O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ~ ~l ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ r r r ~ ~ ~ ~- r r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ r r r r ~ ~ r ~ ~ Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Qc07MMMM M MMMMMMMC7MMMM~MMMMMCO~MMMCO~MMCOOMMMM (p O 00 N r ti 000000 ~~~~p~~~p~~f~~p~pM~pOOtAMMMMNNNNNNN~ ~r-~-~-~~ ~000~tOOMOtA~~'~O'~~O<D(ONONNNNNNNNNN ~~r.~~rrOtO<D~Ot0t0~t~CO CO (O <D~O~D(OCOI~~OtD~O~DCD~DCO~DCO~D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f~ f~ IQ~ 1~ 1~ f~ h •- 1~ f~ I~ ~ ~ M I~ I~ f~ I~ 1~ I~ ~ ~ ti N ~ ti ~ ~ ~ fQ~ ~ ~ ti ~ Q. ~ ~ Lt 1 l~ L~ l~ L~ l~ l~C) LL~ l~ L~ l~ l~ l~ L~ l~ l~ ~ l~A ll~ L~ t~ ~ l~ l~ L~ 1~ ll~ Ln L~ ~ l~ L~ IV rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnrnwrnrno~ rnrn o~rnc~a~o~rnrno~c~rno~rno~www d ~aQQQQQQQaQQQQaQQOQaQaQaQQQQQQQQQQQaQ cnUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUcnUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU aQQQQQaoQaQQQ C~ C~ C~ (7 C7 C7 C9 ? C7 C7 (7 C9 C7 000000000000 ~~~~~~~a~~~~~ ~'QQQaaQa~QQQQQ Utncntnc~t~clltnUtntnc~c~tn 000000 ~ ~~~~~0 Q» ggggg~~~QQ 00ooooowoo W W W W W W~ cncncncnv~m~~ww Q Q Q Q Q Q v,aaaaaaC~C~oo ~~pOj00p~O~00M0 ~ ~O ~C1 ~ ~A ~ ~ O I~ to 'C a0 a000000000MOO00 Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N e- ~ m ~Qa~aQ aQaQacnQQQQaaQaaQ ~00~00000000~0000000000 a H H H F- Z H F- H 1- J H F- H H F- H F- H H H ~~~=~~W~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ pQQOQQ~QQQa oQaQQaQQQQQ Jfn!!)(~lnfnLL.(/)fAfnf/) Jfn(nf/)fnC/)fnf!)!nf/)!A Q Q Q Q Q 3 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q W ~0~~ ~~~~~000~0 O ZzzzOzzZZZZZZZZ aaa}Qa~aa~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ zzz~zz~,zz~zQQQQ~000QQQQQQa OOO~OO~OOwOiy„W WLL(~LLLLWLLW WLLWILIL ~ii U U U U a U U U U U U U U U U ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ O W D ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c} .- 1~ ~ O ~ O ~ O t0 ~ r lf) ~ ~ ~ (D ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ 000 (00 Cp 00 O N~ X~ N r' O ~O 00 O ~ ~ O 00 cD CO CO tD I~ lA lA In to <D In cD (C tD <D V, O O O O ~ 00 00 00 O 00 00 O 00 00 ~O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 OD 00 00 00 00 00 O 00 m W Z W Y W J J Q J Q U ~ ~ O Q~"U QW J QUHW~W W m~ ~ Z~~ ZOO W cnQ w~W Wm?O ~~ N W ZQ ~ UQ= Qotf~ H-~~ J W Qp...=~ _ 0 J ~ QJ ~F- }iQ otS~w} J~otSUF-Q~oiS ~W Q-, Q ~ HQ°~Qw xsmC~ ~zmm~ma~UmF-J o2Sa Qotf = (A zF-.i-,~~ WWJ F.OO~Q~N~,a°~Jm WO ~~~~~ U a2SJolS~W~~Z~a==OWoiSotSUJJ~~~}~QQH~ wJ~F.W~~ a~~}==QZw~Upz~~Ja Q~zjZp~w~ Q=mazQQOOz~~~~~~OW~~~WZQpozU w~uQim~OU -,F-O W~ YZZ> JO ~ ~Y= Z p ~ Q W~~p J~cn~m~f-~Qpg~uJQLLZf-~F-~Q JZ_U?2wWaZ~ ~~W~O-W ~2>ZQw2W-w~=YfA~ll.1~WO~~Z2WO ~QQZW>U=~JZZZ(n>O~ J~JQ}ZUU-O ~Z J NWwJO~00002Q>~~JQwWO~C~~}~QOzmwQ=>'OOQW~ ZY~U~m(7~~C~U W WOC~ W JLL('~'}ZmJmO~ W W J~>=mF-~~ ~~~~~~ NM O(0~0000rNMd'r NM O<D~OOO'-NM 1~~D1~ 000OrrNM M M ~ M M M M M ~ ~ tt ~ ~ to M N ~ O O O t1~ to tD CO cC ~G ~ cp ~O tC t0 ~O f~ 1~ Q O O ~~~ VO~~~~~ VO'Oa'~~~~~~d0'~~'Od'~~~~d0'~~~'~~~~~0000000 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 O O O O 0 O O O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 MO00 00 00 00 0 00 00 W0000000000000000000000 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ~ N r ~ f~ f~ (O cD O ~ ~ In ~ ~ ~ ~ lf') 0 ~ to In Ln 0 to In 1~ h I~ O N 00 Op 00 r 00 O O 0 O 0 N 0 'Cf N N 0 r In r r r r r r r O r r r Ln r r N In N O N r r r~ r r 0 r r r tGOO~h tOOM(OCG~DCO(OO COtOCDI~~O~D1~0f~OrCO(OONCOC0NOt000 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ 4 C7 ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ M O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O et 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 1Q~ IQ~ fpm I~ 1~ 1~ 1~ I~ I~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r 1~ I~ I~ N f~ 1~ f~ I~ IQp~ f~ Ln I~ Ipp~ QMp I~ 1~ I~ l~ Ln Ln ll~ l~ L~ L~ LLO ll~ l~ lO lOC! L~ t~ LOCH l~ L~ ll~ L~ t~ l~ ~ ~ LL~ LL~ lOC) LA l~ ~ l~ LA In lOC! ll~ ll~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aaaQaQQaQaQQaQaQQaQaQaQaQQQaQaQQaaQaa UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU w w J aaaaQ~aagQaQaQQ aaQOaaQ QaaaQa QaWaaa oc~c~oo c~c7 t~c~c~c~c~c~wc~c~c~?c~c~c7 oc~oc~oc~zc~c~~c~c~c~ 00000000~000000~000~000}0oooooWooWooo ~~~~-- ~~Q~~~-~~~-o~I-H~HF-I-UHF-F-HF-F-pHF-~I-F-H ~~~~~Q~~Q~~~~~~Q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~ cncnv~cn~n3v~cncncncncnv~cnv~v~v~cncnUV~cncnc~v~u~~ncnv~cn~~nv~~v~cncn > U Q ~ p W > Z > Z Q > > > > > > Q > > > ~ > > > > ~ > > > > > ~ > > > >> p p~ Q J 3 0 0 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q p Q a p a p Q p Q Q Q Q Q a Q Q Q gaa~~ a~ QQaaQac~aaa~aa~p~}a}}} }}_}}~ ~zz °zwc7xx=xxxoxxxwxxO~oopooorooUOOo QO00O}~n-Z~~'~~~'~~~'~~Y~~HQHU-UUU~nUUZUUU U~~»~a~JQaQaaa~aaaa~aax3~Uw000XUUgo~~ ~ppddw~-~a~~~~~~Q~~~~~~C~OC~~~~~~O~~m~~~ t[1reOet~MM~jJrO W 0~rf~cDO~00_N(O0(ONtnxMOr~l~prl~m0tf~1~NO_aD t~i~lnO~m~~~cNOC~D~cn0~c0D~cNDC0~00D~M ~O~tNf~N~A~~OcNO~~cN0c0~ ODOOOOMMr00shM0000000000000000000r0000MOMOpO000p00 Op Op1~000000 r r r r r (O r r N r r r r r ~- r ~ r r N ~ r r r r r N r r r Q. r r r r r r ~ W Q w w ~ ~ = H J 'J w to ~ Q w m (n J ~ J J ~ O a ~z~~ao~ w oW~~a wQW~os >~ UY zZ w»mY}~ ~~ac~n}~g z wv~zOQW zg ~~ JQ W~~W~J(~ QOZpUWp xWxZp~Um QW ~W o ~ --poJQw ~~Q~~~Q ow~o~~s~s~ ~Qw_o_x U~ ~~>oOaQ~sw°a~Z~~~~ v~U~s~~WoaYpQ~v~icesz H~QC9~N°~>zpc~w~waa~x a W~~a~mxa~Wwots~z~ Q ~ --~- wwJ O Z Z O a x z~ w~ o~~ J cn w~ p w w J x~ J W~ 0 cn o~ w p a >, z~ Q~ ~ O»~z aQwza~~wzwa-~Jw~O~a~w=ago-Q ?~W~?~O~~~Q3~~W~a~mzQ~~xQac~~='~LL~v JJ~~ ~ W ~p fAW~ppQ~ Zx W22~~pYZ>~JJLL~~QC7m0 p~Qax~~C9-wY~ ~~~-~YU_i--=cn UapWJQZ ~~OOp ?z?~OUw~i~OO~Owww_wpg~a~wQ=~~OHaZa~v~z~ x0 =zUZOZO~w~cnm~~g~ Q-~zpZVO~-UQQ~3~QY~I-~ WJ~~Q~~>aWQOQZpQQW W>OqQJaU~~W QwOO~~LLi~xWxQ~ J lQL x Q U p m 9 ~ Y O~ m J> 9 LL a Q~ ~ Y ?~ x x J Y~ p U fn m d a U LL ~ • C7 ~~~~ ~~ • 1n ~p l[) ~p I~ Op O O r- N M ~ M (D I~ 00 M ~O I~ O~ O O ~ ~D f~ 00 0 0 ~ N M ~ 11') ~O f~ CD ~ayrt{ ~ ~ ~ ~ r N N N N N N N N N~ LA O 0 O O cD ~O 00 00 00 00 O O CA O ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 00 h I~ f~ f~ 1~ f~ f~ 1~ I~ -~ f~ 1~ f~ 1~ I~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ 00 00 0 OO 00 ~- ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ~ ~ M 000 ~ r O Ln M 00 CA ~ Cn O M f~ ~ f~ O f~ I~ f~ 0 ~ (O ~ ~O ~ ~ 00 00 00 I~ f~ I~ 00 O O O O CA ~ r- 0 ~ MN00000r'N~-O~~--~0~~ I~~OOOOOOOONNMMNONNMN O ~ ti ti ~ ti ~ 0 ~ O ~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~~~~ O~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ QQQaQQQQQQQQQQQQaaQQaaaQQaQQaQQQaQaaa UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU U Z QQQ~QQQQ QQQQa Qa Q ~QQaQQQQQQQQQQQwQ c~c~c~zc~c~c~c~gc~c~c~c~c~wc~c~wc~~ZC~c~c~c~c~c~c~c~c~c~c~c~c~c~~c~ 00040000~ooooomoomoQQOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~o ~ ~~~z~~~~z~~~~~z~~z~z~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~z~ QQaQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQOJQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ~Q cnv~cncncncnc~v~cnv~v~cncnv~cnv~cncncn~acncncncncncncncnv~cnv~cncncncncn u N _ ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~ D ~ Q O ~ ~ > > > > > (~ O O O O O O O O O Z Q Q Q Q Q Q} J J J J J J J J ooQ Qao~~~3~~~~~~ ~Nvzzzzzz3mmmmLLmm -m ~~} }}~H~F=-QF-HF-c~I-F- --~ZOOOOOOw~~~~-~~~~ ~ O--OOp~w~p~~~ ~~~~o-mmmmmNZwwwwF-ww~nw O H ~ J~~~~~~ ~ ~ m ~ Z ~ m o ~ Uh-U~UU~Q>ci~QOQQ>QmQQvQimwwwwwwZZZZZ~z ~ U~ U w U U>> Z 3 J» 3~ ~ 3 0~ ~ J J J J J J O Q Q Q Q O Q ~C~~C~g~Ou~wu~Ocnv~c~u.c~c~~Cc~~m000UUU~»»m»>C> O O M a ~O f~ 00 O c0 ~O ~ ~t M N Z ~ 000 m O m O M N C O N M M N ~ C~ 000 O N m 0 NN M~{ ~ '~t~MSt~~COMMO~OC~~00~~~M~~000MO~~~O~ MMO~~p OO~M~~ OOM 000000 0000 W W J W Q W ~~ ~ J Z Q}~~ W W Q m}~~ = W Q Z~~~ W W~~ W ~ ~~ ~ WZ J (~°~Wp~ fA~Q fq W O ~ otS~W J ~W~O ~ Z~W Wes-, =~Z ~Z ~ ~ ~ W w Q~~w }~~m w~w~omo~Q r~Q ~W ~ J_ J ~~otS ~ W'~O= O~~mJZ H~~o2SZQ~Q~ W J~ ~Q ~~~-~,~ ~~Ors~ aoQ~p~Q c~?~~w~z°~~°~w ?QQ -w-c=n ~ O~ Q z Y~ m O J J~ Q Q U}~ }~ O w Q w U W m ~n = Q Q~~~ J a LL ~IiZZQ ~JZ~-2m ~~ WLL=Q Z ~ WU W YQJF- ~LL ~m-QQ- W ~Q~ LL =~C9-m ~ ~ 2UO~m~~YZ>Q}ZQ'QQO2J°~JQUQ W(~~'mQQ,JLL.OQ~= Q ~Zn.ZW~~QO~~F-WmtAZC7JC7W>~=mom-Z tA~-O~~ WOWQOW=~Y W W~I-n-~~?jW~2LLl~Ww=O~~WILLiaw~= >Q ~~-J~Q'Q' LL-Z~Q~OLLJ J LL Z Jm~IA~ J W J~Z W H> OfA~aJ=C~IlZ~~U W=LLJ~~ JQm~J W HOa'Q=JQdJZ~ ~~Q=~pOO~~OU~~~wQO~~=~QO~NQ=Q?U=~aQQQ p=c~cn~m~sam=~ammc~~Q.~C~H-Yt7cnw~3ULLJCna~~cni--cn ~~~~ ~~ • OO~NOCC1~000ON ~ N N N N N N N N M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Op CO OD CO 00 CD 00 00 00 OD I~ N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M ~ N O ~- ~ ~ ~ 1~ M~ M M M M O f~ N N •~ !- ~ r- ~ .- O 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ QO pO O O ~ O QO O O 11) IA ~ LOC! ~ 1~ ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q UUUUUUUUUUU Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q WC9C9C9C9 C7 C7 C7C7W X0000 0000 OHH~--HZHHHF-O Zd~~~~~~~~~Zd cnv~cncncnmv~v~v~v~cn f- ~ ~ Z M O JJQQ'da'a'a'd'Q ~~ Q W~ W W W W~ ~WWCn~Q»»g ~00~030000 ~Z~W~o~~~~Q Q J ~ Z > > > > W X>>Ua-aaaa= Oo~~~0p3 N000~ m(pODO)CCO MNON Oo~a`~a~a~u~i a~a~o~aNi w V ~ Q Q' f... J H Z Q Q Q Z W W Z W J FW„ j ~ fn O ~ ~ W O Q Z ~ F- ~ C9 ~ ~ J ~ U = otS otS ~ (~ °~ Z W Q -~ J ~ Z WOpcj~sLaarw U JatSWp~~wF"'~Z JN~~~7pQZ=Z W Q Z~ Q W W J~~~ U' QQa°OQf-oQ=o Q~~~=~IQiQ~U~ • • fJ'"~.1 ~ ~l.!'a;l • Attachment 6 • Salim Sagarchi SEI Corporation 14524 Oak Street Saratoga, CA 95070 October 4, 2004 Ms. Ann Welsh Assistant Planner, AICP City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 Dear Ann, Regarding the neighborhood meeting requested by the Planning Commission, we would like to inform you that after a couple of attempts, we were able to meet with the neighbors to review the final construction plans on May 8, 2004. many attempts were made to contact the neighbors via phone and fliers. With the exception of two, all other immediate neighbors were present at the meeting. During this meeting the construction plans were presented to the neighbors and the elevation and design details were reviewed. All who were present approved these plans unanimously and signed the "Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application" which was submitted to you already. They were also anxious for us to start and finish this project ASAP, as the finished project would add value to the neighborhood. There were several attempts made to meet with one of the two immediate neighbors that were not present at the meeting. Several phone calls, personal meetings requests at his house, invitation to the neighborhood meetings, and visits to his residence have failed to get him to review our plans. These plans were changed due to his personal requests during the planning commission meeting and afterwards. He refused to show up in 4 pre- agreed meeting dates, never returned more than 10 voicemails, and refused to attend the last two meetings. Best Regards, Salim Sagarchi ~~~~~~ Open House Invitation Sunday, May 6, 2004 I~OSt: SEI Enterprise LOCatIOri: Dorcich Orchard, 13089 Quito Road, in Saratoga Time: Thursday Mat 6, from 5:00 to • 7:00 pm. Please come and review our development plans. Meet the developers, ask them questions, check out the detailed plans and give them your feedback. • ~~~~~~ Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Quito Road, Saratoga, CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta,~''and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communtcote it to the Ci of Saratoga My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewe~ the project plans; I nderstand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed inoj~ ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):, Neighbor Name: - Neighbor Address: I-1 ~rU:,`~ ~,~~~ Signature: Neighbor Phone #: `'1 ~ $'- ~ 7 9- g yak Printed: • -~~~r*. ~i1v nf.Giratnva Pl~nninv nerxsrtment r~ • Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Quito Road Saratoga. CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta, fJ'and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may rese a the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City atoga My signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any coacer or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns aze the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Name: ~ i ~ - ~ h ~ ~'~- $c ~o " Y L~ Neighbor Address: ~'~~~~ l~uif• I~aC. sa,ro~,toga, C/~ `~ Sb 7 a -- -'---- Neighbor Phone #: CJ~ 08~ 3 7a ' Printed: +~~~~t~ Planning l~enartment (.'itv nf~4aratnva Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Ouito Road Saratoga. CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. StajJ'and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the ,C,,,,it//y of Saratoga. l~t"My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed Inoj~ ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Address: C f ~~ Neighbor Phone #: _ ~i~ (~ ~ J -~ ~obe,i r3' ~ac~ • r~ !'.itv nf,Saratnvn Plannin¢ 1)enartment Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Quito Road, Saratoga, CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Stafj`'and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative ofoll residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. • need ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, wbic6 after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additions] sheets if necessary):, ~ C Neighbor Name: ~~ ~--~t~+r ~ ~ov1/1 Jt~-~~S Neighbor Address: Is~~o M~~.~~~~ ~- an,.. ~ 9So70 Signature: • .r n ~ rat~va My signature below certifies the following: I have revie ~ the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any conce or issues which to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed Proj~ Neighbor Phone#: ~D~- ~'~d -~0(e / Printed: La„<r r'~ ~. ~,c. l ~ Planninv nenartment ~'~~'~'~~ Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Ouito Road Saratoga, CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues a»d concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Stajj`'and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City f Saratoga signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any cancer or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public 'ng on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):, Neighbor Name: li ~_ Neighbor Address: Signature: ~ ~ City of ~S~irrttnva • • Neighbor Phone #: 7~0 ~/ / ~-~~ Printed: G ~~ ~ z FEZ ~~~©4~ Plannino nenartment • C~ Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Dare: ~ Z y- 0`~ PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Ouito Road Saratoga, CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to oddress issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. StafJ'and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City o Saratoga y signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Name: ~~,~1 ~ ~ ~ c ~~l r `l~ ~l Neivghbor Address: ' ~ C ~ S 0~ v Neighbor Phone #: ~ 7 0 - ~J ~T Signature. Printed: ~~au~a n~cCa~ City n!'~Gtrntnva Planninc nennrtment • • • xoJ LLf1'IrL'O11 I~ 1 L L f 1 'I r L 'O I f ~ ~1`~O V ~~./ ~l~ O~ifr Y7 71 i1'IMiN t * ~ 'iNV NO1111i•O11 I1•f ~O~ 0,~,~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i YI~I 71i11.lOil Nlli~l S10~11H0~1`d ~~ds vw-ro-s ~ ~-- l# 101 ~Sf lOH MAN '' • ~~~ z ~13LSJl0~J i-W~~i ~ ~c ~~ D 0 ~1 C~ M~ OT U~ _ ~- U4 U O Q U Q C~ O Q Q ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~~~_ ~8~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ N ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ F w~ ~~~.~s v 1'j A ~ ~ Z > ~o ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~> }- a~F =~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~-~ ~~~ ~ O ~~ ~°Z ~~ ~ ~o ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ g ~~ ~~ o a~ ~~ ~-~ ~ ~ >~ ~~ ~ '~ ~~ ~~ ~ - ~ . ~ ~ o ~a~ ~r d a r F ~~ ~ ~~ ~p ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ l uFg ~ _~ ~_ €~ s W ~ ~ a W z w '~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~«~ - ~ ~9~ Z F J J w ~~ W- ~> w ~~ U ~~ ~,~ r J ~~ a 3~ w o~ w~ a~ O~ 9 o~ ~~ ~~ J ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ F F F F F 88~8~ ~~~~~ ~~~ gg~j 39 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ««< ~~~~~~ V J V ~ V V ~~~ r- '1, 33 ~ `,y:~ b~ ~ ~ ~~ ():: _~ 1 i N J~ I N 3 E ~ ` V e O F Z 3 ~i~ h-- Lil C.~ ~r ~~ j VZ O LL ~~ ~. r2 . I? ~$ Z O ~O F i% m t~ as~ ~, ~j; I' g >E +` ~ ~ ^~ f~~ y ~ '4' .Zl 5.7WA J ~~ ~~ ~~ t ~~~ ~ -- ~ ~ ~ _ (~ ~ ~:zo .~,~ ~~~~ ~~~ : fit. ~. I ~ , L O~ ~ t Yl NIYb .4- .4S n r ~ I I j ° ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ I d).1 ' I I I '~Z ___.I ~ • -~ ~-- I I ~ ~1 du/ ~ „S I N r_ _ F- w z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ I ~ n _ u7 I Q1 3 ~ _ --_` o I `~ , \ t ; ~~ ~ o I 1 ~ ~ \ ~~ I ~ Y~ ~ 1\ ~ ~ ~_ \ ' O s I ~~~ R 3 W 0 N f _. ,.L._ _--_--._-- _ . __ .__ __._ I ~ ~ I ~,-d 1 ~vz>31n aarllr+rs -- I; ; ~~ o a I ~~I~ o`er ~ ~I ~I 1 ii R~ I ~ y/I ,. I ~ jl i~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~~n+ jl I ~ _ (I ~ I`~ ( II ' ~ 3 rcd .ol ~ I I° I l;,lil ' I I` ~ ~ i ~ I ~~j ~~~ I ~ , / / ~~ ~ `I _ ~ I I it 1 ~ I n{ 1 'f j I __ _~'~-____-_ ~. /~ ~ I jl I dJ.l ~ '~i I ~ ~ 1 \~ `\ aa~ ~ ~ o~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ I sly I I~~~ '~_ `~~ ~nla `3 ~' r ~ / ~ 1- \ ~ 1 c-/ ~I r; a ~ % _~_-----/ /~ X11 ~ ~ ~3t/ ~ \ ~\ sir \ ra~scnd ~~ cw /I ~ \ '. ~ x ry m ~~ ~ PAS _ _ • • ~ -~-ST ~ ~x --{I-^ • ~/~ y! 1 . Y~ _ • _ _ ---~-- ` ^ ~ • ~I ~3y0N3L~ 3JN.l3Ml1 C~R3 - - ---J '~• ,~.jp ~/~' l ~ I ~ - ~,-i,."7L~. .: l_;l!.'o t~.~ ~ ~~ ;~ ~ ~ v. ~~ _ _.____-~._.-________ _ __.______.____._____ __.-.__~______r._____~_ ------ - , - ~, I ~d ~ -- ~~ 0.222 AC ~ ~~ ~ ~~/ c ~ L~ ~ I u / ~ °o ~ r I l/~ ~-- I QI Z W te" q ll ~~MI ~ I I'~b ~/51! y~ )l~ i ~ R O ~ I I ~ ~ I f I U Z ~ ~ ~ I I ~ i f J Q C~ ~ ~ wI ~ i V 2 ~i ?~~ I I v ~ ' i ° ~ I I ( y ^-~ ~I ~ ~ o_IV JI 1 1 ~ ~ U• O iW X~ ( 'e ~ I ~ C. ~ . J~, j ~ R ~ , ,.. ~ ICY ~ ~ ~ I~ I c o o c :o ~~ ~ ~ i ~ N ~~ ~ ~'~ ( ,~ I ~ ~ ~"~' ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ a I ~ - -- -- ~ z ~, ~~, m ~~ ~~ ~ V}i ~i~ F ?•N ~ i 3 r ~ _ __ I Z \_ ~.- ~ wi_n V ' i Z V a 0 ~ ~w ~° a I ~ B~~ ~ ~~ a c wa ~ ~ i 9f ~ ~ ~ ,`9i i i^ ~ a~~ UZ WG ~ -_ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ a~~s aa .._ ~ t .. e L~W N P 6h- ~.:~ ~ s ~ ~ F ~ e ~ F U _`. ~, _ .~i N N~3~ ~ ~ f `~ .- z~ n w a ~ . __~ _ - ... _ ' OF < ~ ~ i .._ ~ . ~ o a .n ~u o s~ .. I .8 U 1 I ' ~ ( ~ ~1 and .ol s, - ~ a~ I i airy s 0 ;~ ~ I ~ ~I ~~, ~ >a I ~ , ~----- j' ~ ~a,<< I / J ~~=- ~BL r' ~'~ ~' i~ ~'~ ~ ~ xv~ ~.ats•iri•oia O i • i L ~ ~ s •i r i •o i ~ LEO-tiIO-' ~Nd~/ bJ `~OlVN~S o~sfr do '~a~vMaN •a ~ v N o s i ti a a o y i v~ a CR/Od OlUlO -~PdH~E10 H~I~IOa ~~ a. viv yais~oy Mlia~ IFdS YVrld3 _w'r N ~,*r ~ S1~31.IHOdd 7,~, ~ o ~131S~10~1 H.U~~I ~Sf 10H MAN i i I I i i ~ i i -.L.-.-.-.-.-1-.-. -.-.- I 'i i I i i I i i ~ ~- i -~---.-.-.~-.-.-.-.-. _1.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.J ` ovoY oaino _- __ _. _ I i • ~ ~ ~ - - L ,. i ~ i ~ ~~ .~a I , I _ ~wu _ aoc~t.iaw ~-------- 1Y110 M~IgO ~~ aY1100 iI~O1R ~~ 6~ ~~~ r., y • ~ ,~ I ~ ~ r I W ~ ~` ~ I ~~° I ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .., __ - ~ ~~ ----~ - I - - I L-- -- -- j~ ~~~ --~_ ~ - .nom - - ~ - - - - - - -~ ~ aeoi .~ \ .~~ ~ i ~, `\ -- _ ~ \ I ~ ~~ s1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I I I 1 &Y I I I ~I I 1 I I I I I I i i ~- - i I I I I I I ~•- I I I I I I I _ I I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ I ~ I i .---_ t 0 r r i t i ~ a t • • xvJ LLtf'IrL'Olf 1. 1 L l f f •1 r l 'o I f LEO-~1468sE fNdd VJ `~JOlVat/S o~ffr Y7 '~lil`IMiN ~, 'i /~ 'r N O Q 1 11 i 1a 011 I Q 7 f ~~ O~ ."'~~!"'~ !" ~,g 1" t;., T~ VI~I'11i1fA0il Nlli~l ~' ~ ~ ' yes Y~TdS ~' ` " ~~r ~ ~ S1O~11HO~id '11~~ " ' ~ Cn ~131SJ10~! Hll~~ ~ 101 ~Sf lOH MAN ~ ~ ~ .~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~$ l a n o o !-~aoa ~~~ ` -~ ~~ ~; `~ ~ ~~ a ~gS'~g 4 I I I I ~ ~" ~ . I ~. .~_ .. I;: .... :. ~ . ~.~ .r:_ . ~~~~ I~: ~~ w,-,• r~ I.. ~ . ~ wl II nI- O ~ I -n ~1= i I I I I I ~ I I I I ~ I 6a I I L---- ~ I I I H~ ~ OQ .. p•~ . . ~i. . ~RE \v ~~ ~ ~ 0 °~ ~ a~ i ~ ~,~ 9 ~• ~.~ _ g~.~ \ ~ ~ I I ~ I ~~ ~ I I I I ~~ I I I of I ~I I x,~a ~ ~y,_I. I ~ I a I ~ I I I m - ----J I of ~I zl I I _.-._. _._._ -.I_._.~ Z~ ~~~ i o~ i a ~ i 6° ~~ z w a Q a ~ ~ r Q J I ' .... "" ~; _ I` I --,. --E . ~~ I I ~ ~ _._._ L i I ~ I~ ~~ I I .~ I I I ~~ I I ~! ~ I 9i l I ---- - ~ - I ~- - - ~ .~ ,~ ~ ~ •1 L L 1r f 'I r l 'O I s o~sfr •vo '~I>rvMaN •a ~ v Nos 1 al a a o ,I I f ~ ~ ~W~pV ~~~ • V ~/~l~~s ' ~ ~` `Ilr 11a1fA011 Nlla~l ~Od Ollf 10 690E.1 -0~t/1-I:~10 F~I~OO ~ '~• ~~ N r ids wrros ~ Q S1O31.IH~~It/ ~ ~ ~ ~3LSJlO~I ~~~ L 101 ~Sf1OH MAN ~ ~' Z ~ ~ -~ ~ - ~~~ ~~ I ~ I - , _ ~ ~ i R ~R • { j I _.. _._ 1 ___ _____, ~. ~ _ _ ~ _ __._ _~.'~- _______ L p- . _ J i ~1 `,99~ I I I I I ~~ ~~ f , \ ~ ~ I ~. ~ ~ _ q I 1 ~I ! \~ /'I t1 ~~ ---. .--- ____ .. .._._ ... _. .. ...__.. I. .., ~~x/ ~ 0909 4 K~x~X __ ~~ir~M X0000 ~ O ' , „ .0 ~ ~' • M x~J ~~.ta'irt'oia i • i ~ ~ t ~ •i r ~ •o i ~ LEO-ti10~8f: fNdb b0 `~/JO1VddS •a n v N o~ l~ a'a o~ ~ o i i ~d0~1011n0 -~I~dH:~O ~dOO y '' r viv ~raianoy -+lia~ ~~~4 ~ ~ S10~lIHO~Id N ,,~j l 101 ~Sf10H MAN f `~~} U ~ z ~ l~31SJ10~! I-W~~I ~~ . ldnoo Boa ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~_ ~o ~gS'Sg _.-._ -._. O~ ~ J$ ~Ix -- I I 0 o~ I a~ I I - ~ =`\\ 'F ~.~~. 9 9 . ``` %~ ~ I \ \~ I I ~~ I o I ~~ ~ of o~ ~ ~- ~'° a~ I ~ § ~~ I °° ~I zl I I I I z~soi --- a ~~ .....,.. I~ ~ ~ T ~I ~ ~ ~I ~ -.-- I ~ ~ . ~ ~ , ~ _ ~ ~ __` • Z W Q ~" Q I I _ ~~ r~ i ~i i i~ I~ :~ r-~ x•J LLfi•IrL'Oti t • i L L f ,i •t r L •0 1,i LEO-~I0-68F. fNd~ bJ `~:~Ol~S o ~ s ,r r 'Y 7 '~ >r rl M ~i N ~Oy pL~p "'Q~~ ~~ 'i/~1/ NOililiC0~1 1491 ,~ ~~~ T ~( YI`r 11i1i.40>tl lllli~{ ~~ n ttt~~~ IH~JbS Y~N'ldS ~ ' e Q Sl~~llH~~d ~ 101 ~S ~~' ~!~ z ~l~1.SJl0~l ~~~ (lOH MAN ~ i ~_ ~_ /'\ V~ v ~ ~ O _ 2 .o-,4 ~ .O-tib t I ~_._._ __ _ - _ - _ O 1 y ~~ -- ~~• - X~[K~K i' ~~~:~: ® g ®aoo0o ©~~~ ; ~ O n .4 ~ ~~' - ;;:, -z ~r //yy //~~~ 444 5 ~ __ _ __ I ~ $ I I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ I I ~ I ~...._ .._ ..; ~ _--1_____~ I ~ 7 _ _ _ _ _. _ __ ._ __ __ ._ -- _. _. _ _. _ - - _ ~ n I ~---- ~ --- ------ -- 4 - -- 7 ~~} ~ - -- -----~-- ~ - ' ~ ~' y ------ - - ----1 _~ r.. _ _ J / '~ - I •,4990 I ' I i 1 / !~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~, `,-, _~ ~_,,I _...._..___.----- ~_ _ ~~ Q9G 4909 ' ~ ,~` ~. %eJ LL>i'I~L'Oli I. 1 L l f i '1 r L 'O I i L4~"rK!-VOE TIRO 1/ ~~/ ~1~~~ Olifir 'r/O 'l111VMiN * ~~ x 7/~V NOililiiOfl If1i ~~ Ol~ ~~ F ~ ~ ~7'j( 'III 11i11dOi1 Mlli~l ~MJd3 W~'TdS ~ ~ ~ ~ S103UHO~ld ~, # ~~~ Q S31SJl0~l ~~~ ~ 101 ~Sf lOH MAN ~ ~,. ~,w -,~ ~~ J ~~ K K x X k a~~a~ '3)J)~ xv~ «ft•Ira•ols I •1 i ~. ~,s •I r ~. •o I ,s LEO-ti'l0-~. fNdb bJ `VOOldHbS o~sfr pro 11i11VMiN • ~~ y iNY NOS111ii0i1 Iflf ~~0~...Q~~ ~Qj VI`I 11i11A0i1 Mlli)i n IH~I~ds YENS ~ N ~~ ~;' ~ S103UHO~Id ~ log ~~ ~~" z Q l~3.~~0~ ~~~ ~Sf lOH MAN ~ 1 xuJ LLfi'IrL'Oli I. 1 L L f f •I r L •o I: LOa-ti'10-68E. fNdd ~~~~,,,,// ~~y ~b~J~y`~.)Ol~S Xa i N `I N O f l i o 0 11 yl Q~ f V Y~ ~~ VoVir~~O Y 1'7~/~J ~~'~4 n `~ i ~i Y11/ 11i1~.1011 Mlli)1 v A-I~Ib~V~S YVr1VS ~ ~ I S103tJHO~id l 101 ~Sf lOH MAN ~' • ~~~ z Q ~13LSJl0~l I-W~~I 1 xpJ LLf4'I~L'Oli • 1 L l f f 'I V L "O I f L4V-"r FV-~ TROY Y ~J ~l~ Oliflr'I! 91 i1~IMiN ~~y~ ~ ~ `f~ iH~I NO.111iOOfi IOfi ~~ O~ -~I..~~ ~ ~ rl`I 11i1~A011 N117~1 S103UH~~d ~~ds ra-ro-s ~, N ' ~ o i ~ ~131S~10~1 H.U~~I l 101 ~Sf10H MAN # ~ ~ Q xoJ LLffi'Ii.L'Olf - 1 • 1 L L f ,s '1 ~ L •01,s LEO-til0-68~ fNdV b~ `~JQl~/$ o ~ ~ f ~ ~r ~ ~ y ~r M a N ~Od O.llf l0 680-~HtIH:?HO F~ iA`I NOflili'Oil IQ7i ~~~ 'IIV 11017~1Oi1 N117)1 ~~~ ~ ~ ~Iliii ~MJds Y~TdS ~ ~ ~ ~ S1~3LIH~~id ~,, ~~~ ~3LSJl0~l ~~~ ~ 10~ ~Sf10H MAN ~ Q If ~ ~I • • • ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~. 3 3 O ~ a `^ I 3 ~ ~ ~~ ~~s ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~-- ~ i.~.a ~ R ~' ~~as 7`~ ~ -- ~ ~Nnn- 3j i i ~d ~ _ :+' Q R ~Y ~!'O' ~ a .:r: r. 1~~ i I i -` A •+w,s •t uw~ N t M 3~ ~ r i ~ g ~ . ~ v ~, 1 Y i ~1 ____~ ~ -_-__J - ~-- - ~ ~ .. ~ 1 ~+ e ~ N~ • ~~ ~! ;~ L--- # ~t ,'~ ~I ~ 1\1 ~ ~ !°. -..~1~ ~.- ~r kk~ 3 ~-uot p: 3 ~ 3 _______ , .='T ~' ~ , 3 Ai110 1/iiZ1NiN y i a ~ w I ;T,I i • / ~, ~, ~~ ~, Z o F' a < ,~ ~ O~ S O{r~ ~ .n n df O~ O ~ ` ~ss •ia lsss ~ a ~ ~ ' d o ~ , a~~ ~~~ ~~~~ :. a ~ ?i~ 3t _ ~ _ r ~ 3 ~S Q - K Y ~ V oa ~ax U a c~ 0 F-~ Q ~ ~ ~ < ~ O w i i o ~ C7 ° i ~ a rn _ 0 ~ ~ ~ J Z ~ U d ~ Q ~ ~ ~ Q d • t ~~ ~~ 3s ~ ;~ .y: D l; i ~~~' ~_ ~+• 8 i~lr g~~rs ~~~~I +' ~ L ~~ r i~ ._~ _$ t t ~ ~_ ~. ~ Y -~ • r ~..__~~ / ' - / ! - _ _ _ _~~ O Y •o Y ~a §~ YY ~ Z~ z`s ~~ 'r T ~i 1 ,] Y~ ~~C r z ;~ a~ ~~ ~ > aQ ~ st ~~ t~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~x~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~p a ~~ „~ ;- N W y W _ ~iI ~~~~~ ~k~~ ~~r~xe~ r~ - ~- ~-- R o a a QQ 5 a~ \~ f ~_ ~t 'n -5 = yy __g- ' . 3A~13a VH1FlVNI ~ a ~i ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~"~ ~~~ ~~~ N ~ Q k ~ O Z~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~^ 5 ~~ ~~ ~° ~~~~~~ y LL ~--uv~r,e i~ o~ • b ., • ~~ •aS a 3 E ~ ~ ~ ~= ~° s 3~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ `~~ ~ ~ ~~~ z ~ ~~ ~ Y i I i ', i s ~ I ~ ~ ~ I i ,, r aI I O ~W~~a *~ r~ ~R~ ~ ~~ Z~- ~ ~ W ~ ~~ ~ s ~,~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~8 ~~~"~~ ~ 4 ~~~ ~ g ~~ F a ~ {y ~Q O ~~° ~ ~ t t ~ I ~ - I ~ I ~ ~ I I I y ~~ li (~ • ~' ® • ,.~ - g I I_~ I' ~ i ± `~ L 3 ~ ~ ,~ ~~ o~ ~ I I < ~ S \ I I O ~ ~~~ ~ W + I O3 ~~ ~ Y fi • j I ~ O~~ ~~ '~ } 3 ~ ~ `~ 3 ~~ r I • a i • ® c **' ~ ~ ._ I ~ . d ~ Cw . . ~~~ / f ~ ~~` ~ o p OV 8~004 y ~i gg~ ~ D°1 0 A~ dr,~' S ~\~ l' ~ _ #~ ~: ~' ~; s y ~ ~ ~ ~a~ a ~ 3 o ~ g ~ I a ~ y _ y1 ~7 = //~ ~ 'v -r ~ T_ ~~W ~~_ ~~3s~~~1 ~~~Y" ~ ~c ~ 5~ ~ ~~ j ~ 8 ~ C >~ ~ c~ ~ .~~ tTril ~ li~~ ll ~i~ , 1 c z N ~ ~ Q+ ~ O ~ z Nom: 0 o ~;~ Q~< ~~~ Z C Ll..~ Fir Q Q ~ F,.~ d • ~ ~~ ~ ~~ W~ ~~ M ~~ r ~ a OC O O ` 9g°_°° x g Tp ~ N Z' $ ; 'p p C Y g« Liv ~'°c . 0 O0~ ~ ~. o ; e 0 <<L..O ._ vi 'm 3'v ~O F , ~ • ° ; nL ° ; n o'm ~ n n m o'°ma~E °1 a i L L ~ M ~ " u w o ~ a~ a 3 0 w J a Z .-~~ ~~ W a 1 _ Z ~_ - ~ U ~ \ Q' `\ J d w o w ~ ~ ~ o a ~\ ci I vi i i if] N _ ~~ ~- N x Z 0 ~ I W 0 ~, g N ~ W u oc a w ~ ~ • ~ a r ~-~ a W Z 3 • 0 a ~ 2 N J ~ > 7 u ~ ~ ¢ x r w ~ H u ~ ~ as ~ \ r ~ ~ ~ ~z°a~a . o ~ J a a °a~ J l.7 U V R W U ~~ l~ ~ I ~ InR ~O .W ~ Q Q J u >' > 1~ J I W I -~ ~ b I u z a . 3 I J ~ W ~ a J '.' Z a ~ a I a ~3 a I ~ J01 J _ _ > a waia a~WQ7 =a U J Y I l7 l 7 Q J ~j ~ l7 ~ _ - _` ~ ~ rY O .-~ N If7 d ~~~ I In I I J J W I I I I ,L l ~~ << ~ ~ t I ,z I i I I ~~ I I 1 ~ ~ ^^J ~ ~L QQ ~~ ~~ ~~ QQ ~,-~ ~,~ ~~ ~~ ~~ //, JI ~ U > I ~ 1 W ~ I ~ J/ s w ~ I Q ~ t _~ ml~ I J/ c> I 1 I \\ I ~ N / N J l~ ~ ~ N ~ Z I W Q= 2 Z- W G z ~`a W3 U_ a Z ~ W~ ~ cn I d' ~ Q Q H ~ Q a' W S a^ J ~ W ~J ap=p QWR a2 l7 \( ~ a Q ~WN J ~ Q Z I U FW- 1.700 J H l7 J v2 HO-a L'7 I d l7 2 ~~r 1nO 1 W ~'"' W ~ ~... ~Q W ~ ~ \ ~ I I I I I ~ I ~ I _ I I I I '~ I I I I ~, '~ I I ~~._ ^ ~ Q ~, j I ~ D D O X ••. I I I % W II II 1iI /~. / ., I /, ,' % I I 1 I{3 I I t, i ~ I~ I I I `.I' I ''~ V I I I C I ' l i a1 1 11 ~1= sll ~~ I _ I ~i e ! ~ !~ I~ ~.~ Z w 7 a a 0 H a Z ~ W ~ W ~ 4 ~ ~ p m / Z / a i °w ~ ~ ~ ~ o o a a 3 °x U C7 C7 i i ~O M ~ ~ ~~.. Item 3B REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • • Application No./Location: 04-129/ 13089 Quito Road -Lot 2 Applicant/Owner: Salim Sagarchi Staff Planner: Ann Welsh, AICP, Associate Planner Date: November 10, 2004 APN: 389-14-37 Department Head: 13089 Quito Road -Lot 2 000001 # 04-129 /Design Review -Lot 2 13089 Quito Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • CASE HISTORY Application filed: Application complete: Notice published: Mailing completed: Posting completed: 5/6/04 10/15/04 10/27/04 10/26/04 10/15/04 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This Design Review application is a request to construct a 3,365 square foot two- story structure on an 11,203 square foot lot located in the R-1, 10,000 zoning district along Dorcich Court. The home is designed in a neo-craftsman style with lap siding, lightweight concrete brown the roof. The home is located within a new subdivision that was the former site of the Dorcich Orchard. The home is intended to be compatible architecturally with the historic farmhouse that is retained on lot five of the subdivision. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Design Review application with conditio s by adopting the Resolution for Application # 04-129. ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft Resolution 2. Key Map 3. Arborist Report dated May 28, 2004 4. Fire Department report dated May 25, 2004 5. Affidavit of Mailing 6. Neighborhood Correspondence 7. Plans, Exhibit "A" • • ~~®o'~' # 04-129 /Design Review -Lot 2 13089 Quito Road • STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R-1,10,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: M-10 -Medium Density Residential MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE:11,203 square feet AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: Average Slope of the lot is less than 10% GRADING REQUIRED: No grading of the site is proposed. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed project consisting of asingle-family residence is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-family residences. The project site is in an urbanized area and is connected to utility and roadway infrastructure. MATERIALS AND COLORS PROPOSED: The house is to be tan lap siding with brown roof tiles. • 0~-0003 # 04-129 /Design Review -Lot 2 13089 Quito Road PROPOSED CODE REQUIREMENTS LoT SIZE 11,203 sQ. i;r. 10,000 sQ. FT. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE 30%. 60% Building Footprint 2,031 sQ. Fr. Walkways, Patio ~St Driveway 926 sQ. Fr. TOTAL 2,957 sQ. FT. 7,257 sQ. FT FLOOR AREA MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE Main Floor 2,031 sQ. i;r. Second Floor 1,335 sQ. i~ r. TOTAL 3,366 sQ. FT. 3,540 sQ. FT. SETBACKS MINIMUM REQUIREMENT Front 25 Fr. 25 FT. Rear 1ST FL -32 FT. 8 IN. 1ST FL- 25 FT 2ND FL-32 FT. 8 IN. 2ND FL.- 35 FT. North Side (R) 1ST FL-10 FT. ~ 1ST FL -10 FT. 2ND FL-30 FT. 2ND FL-15 FT. South Side 1ST FL - 27 FT. 9 IN. 1ST FL - 10 FT. 2ND FL - 37 FT. 9 IN. 2ND FL - 15 FT. Height Residence 25 Fr. 6 IN. 26 FT. * Lot 2 plans must be revised to increase second story rear yard setback to 35 feet. • • C7 a ~'~~~0~ # 04-129 /Design Review T Lot 2 13089 Quito Road PROJECT DISCUSSION Design Review This Design Review application for Lot 2 involves review of a two story home with a design that is based somewhat on the Craftsman style which is typified in the Historic Mitchell house that is to be relocated from the center of the parcel onto Lot 5. The elevations depict a home with lap siding and lightweight concrete tiles that resemble slate shingles. In terms of the front facade, a low profile front entry with porch overhang is proposed. The entry door has nine divided lights in the upper half of the door. Sidelights and transom lights complete the door surround. The first floor front windows also have multi-pane sashes above the larger windowpane, which is typical of the Craftsman style. The plans propose lattice detailing below the upper eave, which reflects similar detail in the original Mitchell House. The design of the house has some of the detailing that is typically associated with Craftsman style dwellings but the character of the house would be enhanced with additional details that reflect the Craftsman style. The use of exposed rafter beams at the eaves and river rock wainscoting of porch columns, which taper from the base to the top, is suggested to add additional texture and depth to the facade. The garage door should also reflect the Craftsman theme of the subdivision with multiple pane divided lights in the upper panel of the door. These details in the design of the house are recommended by staff in order to enhance the character of the development. The site plan proposes four drywells to minim~e storm water runoff in response to the site design regulations mandated by the Santa Clara Watershed C-3 Permit issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Necessary Findings The Zoning Ordinance, Section 15-45.080 identifies the following findings as necessary for granting Design Review approval. (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. (b) Preserve natural landscape. (c) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. (d) Compatible bulk and height. (e) Employs current grading and erosion control methods. (f) Utilizes Residential Design Guide policies and techniques. Actual Findings The following findings have been made regarding the proposed new construction. • (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The height, elevations andplacement on the site of the proposed main or accessory structure, when considered with reference to: (i) the nature ~©~~05 # 04-129 /Design Review - IAt 2 13089 Quico Road and location of residential structures on adjacent lots and within the neighborhoods; and (ii) community view sheds will avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The proposed two-story dwelling will not interfere unreasonably with views and privacy. A privacy fence will be constructed at the rear of the lot to maintain visual screen. The two-story design of the structure allows the impervious coverage to be t~nimized. The plans propose 30% impervious coverage while 60% is the maximum allowable. This design furthers the mandate of the Regional Water Quality Control Board to minimize storm water runoff and decrease impervious coverage. If the home were single story, the impervious coverage would be greater and the on-site water retention would be more difficult to achieve. Trees and along the mutual property line west of the lot are to be protected to continue the visual screen that they provide. Privacy fencing is required. Moreover, the immediately adjacent neighbors indicate support for the two-story dwelling adjacent their property. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. The natural landscape will be preserved insofar as practicable by designing structures to follow the natural contours of the site and minimizing tree and soil removal; grade changes will be minimized and will be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed areas and undeveloped areas. The plan proposes to retain the existing topograp y and minimal grading is proposed. Development on this lot would impact seven trees, five of which are to be retained. Retaining and protecting neighboring trees o this lot reflects sensitivity to the design guideline of preserving the natural landsca e. (c) Minimize perception of excessive bulb. The proposed main or accessory structure in relation to structures on adjacent lots and to the surrounding region will minimize the perception of excessive bulk and will be integrated into the environment. The design does not depict excessive bulk. Although a second story is proposed, the area of the second floor in relation to the first floor is proportional and the varying roofline serves to minimize the perception of bulk. The added design details recommended in the project discussion would also serve to vary the facade, add texture to the front facade and minimize the perception of bulk. (d) Compatible bulk and height. The proposed main or accessory structure will be compatible in terms of bulk and height with (I) existing residential structures on adjacent lots and those within the immediate neighborhood and within the same zoning district; and (ii) the natural environment; and shall not (iii) unreasonably impair the light and air of adjacent properties to utilize solar energy. The proposed two-story home is located in a neighborhood that is predominantly single story in character. However, the existing historic Mitchell house, which is the design inspiration for the proposed home, is a two-story structure and the Lot 2 design reflects this style. ~®0~~6 # 04-129 /Design Review -Lot 2 13089 Quito Road (e) Current grading and erosion control methods. The proposed site development or grading plan incorporates currentgrading and erosion control standards used by the City. The proposed design retains the natural topography since changes to the grade surrounding the house are minimal. Also the plan reflects the mandate by the Regional Quality Control Board to limit impervious coverage and storm water runoff. The proposed drywells are designed to slow runoff and retain the first flush of storm water. (~ Design policies and techniques. The proposed home will conform to each of the applicable design policies and techniques set forth in the Residential Design Handbook The above analysis supports the conclusion that the findings required for granting design review approval can be met provided the applicant carries out the conditions outlined in the resolution of approval. The City Arborist and the Santa Clara County Fire District have reviewed this application. Their comments are included as conditions of approval. • • ~~~~~~ # 04-129 /Design Review -Lot 2 13089 Quito Road Neighborhood Input Resolution #03-049, which granted tentative subdivision approval of this lot, required that the applicant hold a meeting with the surrounding neighbors to obtain a consensus on the design of the homes within the subdivision. Attachment # 5, which is included in this staff report, contains the notices that were signed by the surrounding neighbors. The map below depicts those property owners that approved the design of the proposed homes. As can be seen from the map, neighbors west of the property who share a property line with Lot 2 did not object to the proposed two-story design of the home. • • • o®o~o$ # 04-129 /Design Review - L.ot 2 13089 Quito Road , Commtanity Development The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A", New House Lot 2, Salim Sagarchi, Dorcich Orchard, 13089 Quito Road, Saratoga prepared by Keith Royster, Architect, dated 2/10/03, date stamped 10/28/2004. The conditions of approval identified in this report shall be incorporated into the revised plans. I. The design shall be revised to enhance the architectural detailing in the facade and reflect Craftsman style architecture. Exposed rafter beams at the eaves and river rock facing of porch columns is required to meet the design review guidelines. In order to support this design the porch columns should taper from the base to the top to add additional texture and depth to the facade. The garage door should continue the Craftsman theme of the subdivision with multiple pane divided lights in the upper panel of the door. These details in the design of the house are required in order to enhance the character of the development. 2. Four sets of complete construction plans incorporating required revisions and this Resolution on a separate plan page shall be submitted to the Building Division. 3. The landscape plan shall be installed prior to granting final planning approval of the project. 4. Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. 5. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hadscaped area. 6. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. 7. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. 8. Proper maintenance of landscaping, with minimal pesticide use, shall be the responsibility of the property owner. 9. The site plan shall be stamped and signed by a Licensed Land Surveyor who verifies the accuracy of the boundaries. 10. Prior to pouring of foundation, the setbacks identified in the approved plans shall be verified by a licensed land surveyor. This verification shall be documented by a ~'O(~~09 # 04-129 /Design Review -Lot 2 13089 Quito Road signed and sealed statement from the Surveyor. This statement shall be submitted to the building inspector prior to pouring foundation. 11. The applicant shall install asix-foot high wooden fence at the rear property line in order to maintain the privacy of the abutting rear neighbor. 12. The plan data on sheet SP-1 shall be revised to correct the impervious coverage ratio. The impervious coverage is 30% as per the submitted data. 13. The setback of the rear yard second floor shall meet the minimum setback requirement of 35 feet. This revision to the design of the structure shall be made on the revised construction drawings. Fire Protection District The Santa Clara County Fire District reviewed this application on May 25, 2004 and their requirements are included as conditions of approval. The complete requirements are included as Attachment #5. 1. Required Fire Ilow: the fire flow for this project is 1,000 gpm at 20-psi residual pressure. The required fire flow is available from area water mains and fire hydrants(s), which are spaced at the required spacing. 2. Public Fire Hydrant Required: Provide 1 public fire 'hydrant at locations to be determined by the fire department and the San Jose ater Company. Hydrants shall have a minimum single flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 p i residual with spacing not to exceed 500 feet. 3. Timing of required water supply installations: Installations of required fire service and fire hydrants shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested and accepted. 4. Garage Fire Sprinkler Required: An approved automatic fire sprinkler system designed per National Fire Protection Association Standard #13D and local ordinances, shall be provided for the garage. To ensure proper sprinkler operation, the garage shall have a smooth, flat, horizontal ceiling. 5. Fire Apparatus Access Roads Required: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15%. Installations shall conform to Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications. 6. Fire Department Engine Turn Around Required: Cul-de-sac diameters shall be no less than 72 feet. • to ~~U~1® # 04-129 / Desi~ Review -Lot 2 13089 Quito Road . 7. Parking Along Roadways: The required width of fire access roadways shall not be obstructed in any manner and parking shall not be allowed along roadways less than 28 feet in width. Parking may be permitted along one side of roadways 28-35 feet in width. For roadways equal to or greater than 36 feet, parking will be allowed on both sides of the roadway. CityArborist Report The City Arborist reviewed this project and prepared a report dated May 28, 2004. The recommendations of this report are included as conditions of approval. The proposed project on this lot would impact seven trees of Ordinance size (#30-34, 39, 40). They include three Fruitless Mulberries (#30-32), two American Persimmons (#33, 34) and two Italian Cypress (#39, 40). All but #33, 34, 39 and 40 are shown on plans reviewed. Per City Ordinance, a bond equal to 100% of the appraised value of these trees, which is $S,Tl8, is required to promote their protection. The September 11, 2002 arborist report identifies 36 fruit trees of Ordinance size scattered throughout the property. Many are dead while the others appear in overall poor condition. For this reason, their removal is appropriate and mitigation is not suggested. The below recommendations are intended to be used in conjunction with those presented in the September 11, 2002 report. 1. Tree protective fencing shall be installed precisely as shown on the attached map and established prior to any demolition, grading, surface scraping, construction or heavy equipment arriving on site. It shall be comprised of five- to six-foot high chain link mounted on two-inch diameter, galvanized steel posts, driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 12 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. 2. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the fenced areas (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: grading, surface scraping, trenching, storage and dumping of materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 3. Protective fencing shall remain installed throughout the landscape installation phase. Small openings can be created immediately before landscape construction begins to allow for foot traffic and wheelbarrow access only. 4. The surveyed locarions of tree trunks #33, 34, 39 and 40 must be shown on all future site, grading and drainage, and landscape plans submitted to the City. 5. Upon being available, plans showing grading and drainage, planting, irrigation, and i underground utilities shall be reviewed by the City for tree impacts. ~~~11 # 04-129 /Design Review -Lot 2 13089 Quito Road 6. All underground utilities (i.e. water, gas, sewer, electrical) and drainage features (such as drain lines, swales and dissipaters) should be designed outside from beneath canopies of retained trees; the arborist should be consulted if this is not feasible. 7. Supplemental water shall be supplied every two weeks to each retained tree during the months of April thru November. This should begin at the start of grading and continue through construction. A rate of 10 gallons per inch of trunk diameter should be applied using soaker hoses placed on the soil surface beneath the mid- to outer-canopies. 8. All existing underground pipes and imgation lines beneath the canopies of retained trees should remain buried and be cut off at existing soil grade. 9. Irrigation trenches should be designed no closer than 10 times the trunk diameter of trees being retained. Where this is not feasible, the irrigation system must be adrip- typesystem placed on top of existing soil grade. 10. Irrigation spray should reach no closer than three feet from a tree's trunk (including those of newly installed trees). All forms of irrigation for new trees must be of adrip- type system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. 11. Lawn or other plant material requiring frequent watering must comprise no more than 20-percent of the area beneath a tree's canopy. All other plant material should be drought tolerant. 12. Mulch, stones or other landscape features must be placed o closer than one-foot from the trees' trunks. Bender board should not be installed an tilling of the soil should not occur within 10 tunes the diameter of the nearest trunk. 13. Herbicides should not be used beneath tree canopies. Wh e used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. 14. The pruning of trees must be performed under the supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. Information regarding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained by referring to the following website: http://www.isa-arbor.com/arborists/arbsearch.html. Conclusion The proposed residence is designed to conform to the policies set forth in the City's Residential Design Handbook and to satisfy all of the findings required within Section 15- 45.080 of the City Code if developed with the recommended conditions. The residence will not interfere with views or privacy, preserves the natural landscape and will minimize the perception of bulk. The proposal if developed with conditions and revisions, will satisfy all other zoning regulations in terms of allowable floor area, setbacks, maximum height and impervious coverage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Design Review application with conditions by adopting the Resolution for • Application # 04-129. 12 ~~04~L2 Attachment 1 • ~~O®13 # 04-129 /Design Review -Lot 2 13089 Quito Road RESOLUTION N0.04- APPLICATION N0.04-129 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sagarchi/ 13089 Quito Road -Lot 2 WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review approval to construct a 3,365 square foot two story home on Lot 2, a 11,203 square foot lot in the recently approved Dorcich Orchard subdivision. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS the project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-fa y residences. The site is in an urbanized area and is connected to utility and roadway infrastructure and involves the construction of one single family home; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Design Review approval, and the following findings have been determined: Policy 1, Minimize the perception of bulk The design uses architectural features to break up massing. The house is two story with a cross gabled roof which reduces the mass of the roofline. Fenestration along the lower front facade includes elongated windows with multiple panes in the upper transom and large panes in the lower portion of the sash. The covered, porch with simple front door with sidelights and transom is low profile in design and proportion. Policy 2, Integrate structures with the environment The design preserves the natural landscape, since the plan proposes to retain the existing topography and minimal grading is proposed. Development on this lot would impact 7 trees. The plans depict tvvo trees in the front yard to be saved and two trees in the rear, which are on the adjacent parcel to be protected. Policy 3, Avoid interference with privacy ~~~0~~~ # 04-129 /Design Review - L.ot 2 13089 Quito Road , The orientation of the house controls view to adjacent properties. Those portions of the house, which contain outdoor living space, are oriented toward the rear of the house. The house is designed to reduce noise impacts on adjacent dwellings. The garage is located toward the front of the property with access from the cul-de-sac. A privacy fence and mature trees at the rear property line to maintain privacy. Policy 4, Preserve views and access to views The proposed two-story dwelling will not interfere unreasonably with views and privacy. A privacy fence is to be installed at the rear of the property and existing trees are to be retained and protected so that the existing mature trees will be retained and continue to provide the view of mature landscaping. Policy 5, Design for maximum benefit of sun and wind The location of the house does not block the sun of any neighbors since additional setback is provided. The mature trees to be retained provide shade and wind block therefore the design maxini?es existing landscaping and does not interfere with the solar access of neighbors. Now, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the Ciry of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the site lan, architectural drawin s, P g plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the application by for Design Review approval is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: CO MM UNI T Y D E V F_ L O P M FM The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A", New House- Lot 2, Salim Sagarchi, Dorcich Orchard, 13089 2uito Road, Saratoga prepared by Keith Royster, Architect, dated 2/10/03, date stamped 10/28/2004. The conditions of approval identified in this report shall be incorporated into the revised plans. 1. The design shall be revised to enhance the architectural detailing in the facade and reflect Craftsman style architecture. Exposed rafter beams at the eaves and river rock facing of porch columns is required to meet the design review guidelines. In order to support this design the porch columns should taper from the base to the top to add additional texture and depth to the facade. The garage door should continue the Craftsman theme of the subdivision with multiple pane divided lights in the upper panel of the door. These details in the design of the house are required in order to enhance the character of the development. 2. Four sets of complete construction plans incorporating required revisions and this S Resolution on a separate plan page shall be submitted to the Building Division. ~'~~~~~5 # 04-129 /Design Review -Lot 2 13089 Quito Road 3. The landscape plan shall be installed prior to granting final planning approval of the project. 4. Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. 5. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hadscaped area. 6. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. 7. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. 8. Proper maintenance of landscaping, with minimal pesticide use, shall be the responsibility of the property owner. 9. The site plan shall be stamped and signed by a License Land Surveyor who verifies the accuracy of the boundaries. 10. Prior to pouring of foundation, the setbacks identified the approved plans shall be verified by a licensed land surveyor. This verification shall be documented by a signed and sealed statement from the Surveyor. This statement shall be submitted to the building inspector prior to pouring foundation. 11. The applicant shall install asix-foot high wooden fence at the rear property line in order to maintain the privacy of the abutting rear neighbor. 12. The plan data on sheet SP-1 shall be revised to correct the impervious coverage ratio. The impervious coverage is 30% as per the submitted data. 13. The setback of the rear yard second floor shall meet the minimum setback requirement of 35 feet. This revision to the design of the structure shall be made on the revised construction drawings. FIR E PR O TbCTION DIST R ICT The Santa Clara County Fire District reviewed this application on May 25, 2004 and their requirements are included as conditions of approval. The complete requirements are included as Attachment #S. s ~~~®~~ # 04-129 /Design Review -Lot 2 13089 Quito Road 1. Required Fire flow: the fire flow for this project is pressure. The required fire flow is available from hydrants(s), which are spaced at the required spacing. CJ 1,000 gpm at 20-psi residual area water mains and fire 2. Public Fire Hydrant Required: Provide 1 public fire hydrant at locations to be determined by the fire department and the San Jose Water Company. Hydrants shall have a minimum single flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual with spacing not to exceed 500 feet. 3. Timing of required water supply installations: Installations of required fire service and fire hydrants shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance maybe withheld until required installations are completed, tested and accepted. 4. Garage Fire Sprinkler Required: An approved automatic fire sprinkler system designed per National Fire Protection Association Standard #13D and local ordinances, shall be provided for the garage. To ensure proper sprinkler operation, the garage shall have a smooth, flat, horizontal ceiling. 5. Fire Apparatus Access Roads Required: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of ~36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15%. Installations shall onform to Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications. 6. Fire Department Engine Turn Around Required: Cul-d -sac diameters shall be no less than 72 feet. 7. Parking Along Roadways: The required width of fire access roadways shall not be obstructed in any manner and parking shall not be allowed along roadways less than 28 feet in width. Parking may be permitted along one side of roadways 28-35 feet in width. For roadways equal to or greater than 36 feet, parking will be allowed on both sides of the roadway. CITyARBORIST REPOR T The City Arborist reviewed this project and prepared a report dated June 2, 2004. The recommendations of this report are included as conditions of approval. The proposed project on this lot would impact seven trees of Ordinance size (#30-34, 39, 40). They include three Fruitless Mulberries (#30-32), two American Persimmons (#33, 34) and two Italian Cypress (#39, 40). All but #33, 34, 39 and 40 are shown on plans reviewed. Per City Ordinance, a bond equal to 100% of the appraised valuel of these trees, which is $5,778, is required to promote their protection. # 04-129 /Design Review - IAt 2 13089 Quito Road The September 11, 2002 arborist report identifies 36 fruit trees of Ordinance size scattered throughout the property. Many are dead while the others appear in overall poor condition. For this reason, their removal is appropriate and mitigation is not suggested The below recommendations are intended to be used in conjunction with those presented in the September 11, 2002 report. 1. Tree protective fencing shall be installed precisely as shown on the attached map and established prior to any demolition, grading, surface scraping, construction or heavy equipment amving on site. It shall be comprised of five- to six-foot high chain link mounted on two-inch diameter, galvanized steel posts, driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 12 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. 2. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the fenced areas (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: grading, surface scraping, trenching, storage and dumping of materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 3. Protective fencing shall remain installed throughout the landscape installation phase. Small openings can be created immediately before landscape construction begins to allow for foot traffic and wheelbarrow access only. 4. The surveyed locations of tree trunks #33, 34, 39 and 40 must be shown on all future site, grading and drainage, and landscape plans submitted to the City. 5. Upon being available, plans showing grading and drainage, planting, irrigation, and underground utilities shall be reviewed by the City for tree impacts. 6. All underground utilities (i.e. water, gas, sewer, electrical) and drainage features (such as drain lines, swales and dissipaters) should be designed outside from beneath canopies of retained trees; the arborist should be consulted if this is not feasible. 7. Supplemental water shall be supplied every two weeks to each retained tree during the months of April thru November. This should begin at the start of grading and continue through construction. A rate of 10 gallons per inch of trunk diameter should be applied using soaker hoses placed on the soil surface beneath the mid- to outer-canopies. All existing underground pipes and imgation lines beneath the canopies of retained trees should remain buried and be cut off at existing soil grade. ~-~ • • ~~®®~~ # 04-129 /Design Review -Lot 2 13089 Quito Road , 9. Imgation trenches should be designed no closer than 10 times the trunk diameter of trees being retained. Where this is not feasible, the irrigation system must be a drip-type system placed on top of existing soil grade. 10. Irrigation spray should reach no closer than three feet from a tree's trunk (including those of newly installed trees). All forms of irrigation for new trees must be of a drip-type system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. 11. Lawn or other plant material requiring frequent watering must comprise no more than 20-percent of the area beneath a tree's canopy. All other plant material should be drought tolerant. 12. Mulch, stones or other landscape features must be placed no closer than one-foot from the trees' trunks. Bender board should not be installed and tilling of the soil should not occur within 10 times the diameter of the nearest trunk. 13. Herbicides should not be used beneath tree canopies. Where used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. 14. The pruning of trees must be performed under the supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. Information regarding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained by referring to the following website: http://www.isa-arbor.com/arborists/arbsearchhtml. CrrrA zTO~vFr 1. Applicant agrees to hold Ciry harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. 2. Noncompliance with any of the conditions of this permit shall constitute a violation of the permit. Because it is impossible to estimate damages the City could incur due to the violation, liquidated damages of $250 shall be payable to this City per each day of the violation. Section 2. Construction must be commenced within 36 months or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the. requirements of Article 15-90 of the Saratoga Ciry Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. ~~®®~~ # 04-129 /Design Review - IAt 2 13089 Quito Road PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Ciry of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 10`h day of November 2004 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and onditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writ ng, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the Ciry Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date • ~~~~20 • Attachment 2 • ~~'®®~~ •i •i KEY PLAN ~~~~22 • Attachme~;nt 3 • ~®fl'23 ~, ~ ~~ _ ARB~ RESOURCES • Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care A TREE INVENTORY AND REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED NEW RESIDENCE AT 13089 QUITO ROAD -LOT 2 SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA OWNER'S NAME: SAGARCHI APPLICATION #: 04-129 APN #: 389-014-037 Submitted to Community Development Departure t City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 Prepared by: David L. Babby, RCA !~ Registered Consulting Arborist #399 Certifted Arl~grist #WE-4001A • • May 28, 2004 P.O. Box 25295, San Mateo. California 94402 • Email: arborresources@earthlink.net Phone: 650.654.3351 • Fax: 650.654.3352 • Licensed Contractor #796763 • David L. Arborist 28, 2004 • SUMMARY The proposed project on this lot would impact seven trees of Ordinance size (#30-34, 39, 40). They include three Fruitless Mulberries (#30-32), two American Persimmons (#33, 34) and two Italian Cypress (#39, 40). All but #33, 34, 39 and 40 are shown on plans reviewed. Each tree is planned for retention. Measures presented in the `Recommendations' section of this report must be carefully followed and incorporated into construction plans. Per City Ordinance, a bond equal to 100% of the appraised value of these trees, which is $5.778, is required to promote their protection. INTRODUCTION The City of Saratoga Community Development Department has requested I review the potential tree impacts associated with constructing asingle-family residence on a vacant lot at 13089 Quito Road -Lot 2, Saratoga. This report presents my findings and recommendations. Information regazding trees on this lot is presented within the table attached to the City Arborist report dated September 11, 2002. Metal tags containing numbers corresponding to those presented within this report were found attached to each trunk. Plans reviewed for this report include Sheets T-1, SP-0, SP-2 and A-2.4 by Keith Royster Architects, dated 2/10/03. The trees' locations, numbers and canopy perimeters are presented on an attached copy of Sheet SP-2 (Site Plan). Trees #33, 34, 39 and 40 aze not shown on plans reviewed. Their trunk locations have been added to the attached map and should not be construed as being surveyed. Trees #39 and 40 are situated on neighboring properties and were inventoried for this report~as eir root zones are vuTnerabZe to constru ~on~amage. The September 11, 2002 azborist report identifies 36 fruit trees of Ordinance size scattered throughout the property. Many aze dead while the others appear in overall poor condition. For this reason, their removal is appropriate and mitigation is not suggested. Please note I am unable to fully determine how many of these trees would be removed from this lot due to their high number as well as the lot boundaries not being seen. 'The appraised tree values shown on the attached Tree Inventory Table are calculated in accordance with the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9'h Edition, published by the International Society of Arboriculture, 2000. Sagarchi Property, 13089 Quito Road -Lot 2, Saratoga Page 1 of 3 ~j City of Saratoga Community Development Department Ees~~~~/ ' ~ 2~ 1 • David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist May 28, 2004 RECOD~IIIIENDATIONS . The below recommendations aze intended to be used in conjunction with those presented in the September 11, 2002 report. 1. Tree protective fencing shall be installed precisely as shown on the attached map and established prior to any demolition, grading, surface scraping, construction or heavy equipment arriving on site. It shall be comprised of five- to six-foot high chain link mounted on two-inch diameter, galvanized steel posts, driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 12 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. 2. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the fenced areas (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: grading, surface scraping, trenching, storage and dumping of materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 3. I recommend protective fencing remain installed throughout the landscape installation phase. Small openings can be created immediately before landscape construction begins to allow for foot traffic and wheelbarrow access only. ,i 4. The surveyed locations of tree trunks #33, 34, 39 and 40 ' ust be shown on all future site, grading and drainage, and landscape plans submitted t -.the City. 5. Upon being available, plans showing grading and draina e, planting, irrigation, and underground utilities shall be reviewed by the City for tree i pacts. 6. All underground utilities (i.e. water, gas, sewer, electrical) and drainage features (such as drain lines, swales and dissipaters) should be designed outside from beneath canopies of retained trees; I should be consulted if this is not feasible. 7. Supplemental water shall be supplied every two weeks to each retained tree during the months of April thru November. This should begin at the start of grading and continue through construction. I recommend a rate of 10 gallons per inch of trunk diameter applied using soaker hoses placed on the soil surface beneath the mid- to outer- canopies. 8. All existing underground pipes and irrigation lines beneath the canopies of retained trees should remain buried and be cut off at existing soil grade. 9. Irrigation trenches should be designed no closer than 10 times the trunk diameter of trees being retained. Where this is not feasible, the irrigation system must be a drip- type system placed on top of existing soil grade. Sagarchi Property, 13089 Quito Road -Lot 2, Saratoga Page 2 of 3 City of Saratoga Community Development Department ~*,~~~~~ • • David L. Babby, Registered Consultrng Arborist May 28, 2004 10. Irrigation spray should reach no closer than three feet from a tree's trunk (including those of newly installed trees). All forms of irrigation for new trees must be of adrip- type system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. 11. Lawn or other plant material requiring frequent watering must comprise no more than 20-percent of the area beneath a tree's canopy. All other plant material should be drought tolerant. 12. Mulch, stones or other landscape features must be placed no closer than one-foot from the trees' trunks. Bender board should not be installed and tilling of the soil should, not occur within 10 times the diameter of the nearest trunk. 13. Herbicides should not be used beneath tree canopies. Where used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. 14. The pruning of trees must be performed under the supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. Information regarding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained by referring to the following website: http://www.isa-arbor.com/arborists/arbsearch.html. Attachment: Site Map (Copy of Sheet SP-2) I • Sagarchi Property, 13089 Quito Road -Lot 2, Saratoga Page 3 oj3 City ojSaratoga Community Development Department ~ ~'~'~,~,~ ~' i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ o ~ b ~ ._. ~ I ~ 95.63' . - ~ _ \ ~~ o ~ ~.-~~ ~. • 1 ~ _ - ,' ~T n, - u -~ ~~ I i PROTECTIVE FENCING ~` Sqb sF ~~ I I ;I ~ ~ ~' I I \ , j I ; \ ~~-a• 1 \ e='-a• i ~~ 1 ~ .LOT 2° -~ Flo I , III I I ; i Ia~• p~6GID I I II %; I J I I I I I I I ~ I I I la' C76GIt _i i ~~ - - - I 31 ~ 11 ~..~• I ~ ~ I I ,I ~ I ~I _ I I ~ I / I ~ I~ L__'' i b 1 ,~ \ L - - I I --- - 1 i ~ ~ 34~ ~ - ~ N87 ° I'1'5 "E ~ ~ ,~ ~________I~ ___ ~____~~33 X30 __ ~i I ~, - I ` 115.01' o - I I ~ \\ / I ` ~ ~ ~ I ~ i $jg,~: ISOl9 Quito Ro^d - Lo12, sarslo8s 8881 sF mfg: Ciry of Stntogs Community Developmem Ckpsnmcm I I Prepared By: - Noes: Msp idendRes seven trees of Ordinulcc siu. -~ Csnopyperimetensaspproximue ARBOR RESOURCES `\ Map lus been reduced in siu snd is not to scde ra.,r~...r..nnl A.h...rrnlarol ron,.rr,nt .t~ r..•, rn.r ~: Mry 2f, 20W ro. em~ 272ns Sen A7.Im. fA wrlli IMpnc (h4n h4-1711 Emil: a.bpretoxrm'n.eNJinA. 1 )T #2 Attachment 4 • ®~~~ ~~ ~ ~ FI '~ DEPARTMENT FIRE SANTA CLARA COUNTY 14700 Winchester Blvd., Los Gatos, CA 95032-1818 (408) 378-4010 • (408) 378-9342 (fax) • www.sccfd.org PLAN REVIEW NUMBER 04 1081 BLDG PERMR NUMBER CONTROL NUMBER FlLE NUMBER 04-129 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS CODE/SEC. SHEET ~ NO. ~ REpUIREMENT Review of a proposed 3,370 square foot single family residence with an attached garage. This review covers Lot #2. Review of this Developmental proposal is limited to acceptability of site access and water supply as they pertain to fire department operations, and shall not be construed as a substitute for formal plan review to determine compliance with adopted model codes. Prior to performing any work the applicant shall make application to, and receive from, the Building Department all applicable construction permits. sP-o ~ z ~It is noted that the Site Plan does not appear to match the scale shown. It is noted that the proposed new street will be ide tified as Dorcich Court. Please reflect that street name on all future applications. uFpc III-A~dix Rgquired Fire Flow: The fire flow for this project is 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. The required fire flow is available from area water mains and fire hydrant(s) which are spaced at the required spacing. STG ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ KEITH ROYSTER ARCHITECTS 5/25/2004 1 of 3 SECJFLOOR AREA LOAD DESCRIPTION BY LOT 2 I Residential Construction Hokanson, Wayne SFR- SARGACHI 13089 Quito Rd • Organized as the Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District Serving Santa Clara County and the communities of Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos, ,'~,~~~~® Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, and Saratoga ~~ ~o . ~,~~. ~~ ~~ eou~rtsra CODEISEC. I SHEET tJFC 903.2 UFC 901.3 SMC 16-15.070 • trFc 902.2.2 • RTMENT EIRE DEPA SANTA CLARA COUNTY 14700 Winchester Blvd., Los Gatos, CA 95032-1818 (408) 378-4010 • (408) 378-9342 (fax) • www.sccfd.org PLAN• NUMBER 04 1081 BLDG PERMtT NUMBER CONTROL NUMBER FILE NUMBER 04-129 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS NO. ~ REpU1REMENT 6 Public Fire Hydrant(s) Required: Provide 1 public fire hydrant(s) at location(s) to be determined by the Fire Department and the San Jose Water Company. Hydrant(s) shall have a minimum single flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual, with spacing not to exceed 500 feet. Prior to applying for building permit, provide civil drawings reflecting all fire hydrants serving the site. To prevent building permit delays, the developer shall pay all required fees to the water company ASAP. Timin¢ of Required Water Sup}~ly Installations: Installations of required fire service(s) and fire hydrant(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department, prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested, and accepted. Gara Fi prinkler System Required: An approved, automatic fire sprinkler system designed per National Fire Protection Association Standard #13D and local ordinances, shall be provided for the garage. To ensure proper sprinkler operation, the garage shall have a smooth, flat, horizontal ceiling. A State of California licensed fire protection contractor shall submit three (3) sets of plans, calculations, a completed permit application and appropriate fees to this department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. Fir~A,..pvaratus (Engine) Access Roads Required: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface, a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15°/O. Installations shall conform with Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications sheet A-1. City PLANS SPECS NEW RMOL AS OCCUPANCY CONST. TYPE AppllpntPNrm DATE PAGE STG ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ KEITH ROYSTER ARCHITECTS 5/25/2004 2 OF 3 LOOR ~2 AREA LOAD DESCRIPTION Residential Construction ~ Hokanson, Wayne NAME OF PROJECT ~ ""'^ ""^ SFR- SARGACHI 113089 Quito Rd Organized as the Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District Serving Santa Claro County and the communities of Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Serena, Morgan Hill, and Saratoga ~ ~~~~~ ~s` FIRE DEPARTMENT SANTA CLARA COUNTY 14700 Winchester Blvd., Los Gatos, CA 95032-1818 (408) 378-4010 • (408) 378-9342 (fax) • www.sccfd.org PLAN tiEVIEw NUMBER 04 1081 BLDG PERMR NUMBER CONTROL NUMBER FILE NUMBER 04'129 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS CODEISEC. [JFC 902.2.2.4 L~FC 902.2.4.1 ~rFc 901.4.2 (7FC 901.3 trFc 901.4.4 SHEET NO.I REQUIREMENT 9 Fire Department (En¢ine) Roadway Turn-around Required: Provide an approved fire department engine roadway turnaround with a minimum radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside. Installations shall conform with Fire Department Standard Details and Specification sheet A-1. Cul-De-Sac Diameters shall be no less than 72 feet. Note the fire lane marking requirement in item #11 below specific to the cul de sac bulb. to Parkin¢o Along Roadway: The required width of fire access roadways shall not be obstructed in any manner and, parking shall not be allowed along roadways ~~, less than 28 feet in width. Parking may be permitted along one side of roadways 28-35 feet in width. For roadways equal to or greater than 36 feet, parking will be allowed on both sides of the roadway. Roadway widths shall be measured curb face to curb face, with parking space based on an 8 ft width. 11 Fire Lane Marking Required: Provide marking for all roadways within the project. Markings shall be per fire department specifications. Installations shall also conform to Local Government Standards and~Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications A-6. 12 Timin¢ of Required Roadway Installations: Req fired access roads, up through first lift of asphalt, shall be installed and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of construction. Bulk combustible materials shall not be delivered to the site until installation is complete. During construction, emergency access roads shall be maintained clear and unimpeded. Note that building permit issuance may be withheld until installations are completed. 13 Premises Identification: Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall contrast with their STG ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ LOT 2 SFR- SARGACHI • CY CONST. TYPE AppltearnNem~ DATE PAGE KEITH ROYSTER ARCHITECTS 5/25/2004 3 of 3 DESCRIPTION BY Residential Construction Hokanson, Wayne _ 13089 Quito Rd Organized as the Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District Serving Santa Clara County and the communities o~ Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos, , .~I Los Altos Hilis, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, and Saratoga ~ ~®~a7 • Attachme~~t 5 • ti ~~~~~ AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) I, ~` ~ ,being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 yyyears~t~hat acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the o? ~ day of (S~(~,,!r~(1.P~~ 2004, that I deposited in the United States Post Office within Santa Clara County, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to-wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are en 'tled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15-45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property to be affected by the application; that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. ~~ Signed • ®~~~ • NOTICE OF HEARING BEFORE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF SARATOGA'S PLANNING COMMISSION announces the following public hearing on Wednesday, the 10th day of November at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, which are located in the Civic Theater at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Project details and plans are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Thursday, 7:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. If you have questions, on the project please direct them to Ann Welsh, Associate Planner, awelsh~saratoga.ca.us or 408-868-1230. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and ce. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a public hearing in court, you y be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) descri in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Saratoga Planning Commission at, or pri r to, the public hearing. In order to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed on or before the Tuesday, a week before the meeting. APPLICATIONS #04-128, 129,130,131 & 132 (389-14-37) SAGARCHI,13089 Quito Road - The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct five single family homes on the site of the former Dorcich Orchard which was approved for a six lot subdivision on 11/12/03. The proposed homes are designed to be compatible with the style of the historic farmhouse, which is being moved and restored on Lot 5. The homes are two story structures with a maximum height of 25 feet 6 inches. The floor area of the homes range in size from 3,366 square feet to 3,517 square feet. The property is in the R-1, 10,000 zoning district. The landscaping and Quito Road sound wall are also the subject of review. ~~®~.~~ • to CD I~ 00 O O r N M ~ to ~D 1~ 00 O O LA c0 f~ OD O O r N M ~ to lD ~ ~ LO 1~ 00 O O r MMMMM ~~t~~~ef ~~ef 1A00000rrrrrrrNNNNNNMM ~ ~ M L ~ ~ L 07 L 07 L ~ L ~ c 0o M M M M «~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ e T ~ ~ ~ ~ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r ZOOOOOOO)OO)00)00~ 0000000)00)OOOOOOC~000000~0 Q M M M c~ cO~ M c~ M G M c00 M c~ M M M M M M M M cO~ c~ M cOr 1 M M cO~ c00 M cO~ c00 M M cO~ cO~ t0 _O O O O Q) O O ~} 1~ LA lA (~ r r t~ r r~ t~ r r r r r r to O O O~ LA LA M LA LA M '7 rrrrrr I~OtDLDCOLOLOr'LOLO O O ooooovooooo000 0 f~ f~ 1~ f~ f~ I~ f~ *- f~ I~ I~ f~ f~ M I~ f~ 1~ d L~ lOA LOA LOA LOA LOA LOA LOA LOA lOA LOA LOA tOA lOA LOA LOA ~ fV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N ~p M Lp O O LA M M M M N N N N N N N~ O tC LO ~O N O N N N N N N N N N N cC co c0 cC f~ c0 c0 cC cc cC cC cD c0 cD O O ooooovooo O O o 1pp~ 1~Pfpp~1~f~N1~1~h1pp~1~I~Ipp~fp~lpp~Ipp~ LA tOA~tAtOA~~tOA~~LA~LOAtA~!'~tALA O 0000000) W Q1C~000~O)C~O ~aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaoaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa cnUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUcnUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU aaaaaaaoaaaaaNaa~aa aaaaacnaaaaaaaaaa c~c~c~c~c~c~c~?c~c~c~c~c~oc~c~ac~c~ c~c~c~c~c~oc~c~c~c~c~c~c~c~c~c~ 0000000--oooooQOOLLooooooo~p ;ooooo00000 ~a44aa~ga~aaga~aa~~aa~~ac°naq~ao~agw~a~a~a~a cn~a~ga~a~a~a4a~a~a~a ~'aaaaaaaoaaaaaoaa~aa~aaaa oaaaaaaaaaa UfqlglAfnlofn(nU(AfnfnfnlnJfl~fnlA~fnLLfAfAfn(A Jfnfnln(nfAfnNfA(nfn ~ a aaa aaaaaaaaaa 000000 ° w 000030000000000 o zzzzozzzzzzzzzz 000000 a»»>z» » > z gggg~~~JaaaaaJaa aagagggg ~gggggggg zzzzzz}zz~,zz°z~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ °w°w°w°w°w°w°wooooo~oo~ooWoaaaa--aaaaaaaaaa LL. LL LL LL. to LL LL LL. LL LL LL LL LL LL LL QQQQQQ~~wwwwwXw~ii~ww~wUUUUaUUUUUUUUUU yaaaaaavc~o0oo00o0o00W0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ N LO O .~~{{ 00 N LA M M 0 r' 1~ ~ 0 LA ~ 00 LO r r LA M LA r CG O 00 N ~O O 0 ~ r O CO LO '~ M O O M~~ 00 O N et X" ~! N r 0 LO 00 0 r LA tC 1~ <C N r O ~ppp LO ~ LO LA to LA lf) O I~ N LA O to 00 LO cC LD t0 f~ O O lA O LD LA cC t0 LD O tC O LA lA LA ~000000o0OOa0MOODODOOOOOO° GO 00 LOOO00COCOCO0000CO000000CO00OOCO Q r r r r r r r N r r r r r LA r r m r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r m w a W J Z _ ___ _ -----0 - ___ g ~-cn _a W _- _ J _ - --- - _ _Q U ~- IL --~ -~ -lJil_ m ~ W ~ w U ~ Z~~ Z~~ W mQ w~wwmc~n0 wa w w z ~ } Q = a ~s H ~Q ~ > w a ~ _ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ a~ W ~ ~a°~aw ~canp gZmc~nJu~ia~am~~ `~_ Y ~V°~ 2 ~ JZ~j J°~QWw~Waa~~~~aQ'W~otS~q~W WO ~~F„~~ _U ~ otS~wQ~Z~~22OWotS~iSUJJ~~~}oZa~~ WJ~~w~~ a~~}SSaZW ~()~Z~HJa QaZWZO~IlI~ ~ w m a V a g ~ Z p~ U~~ a m w~~~ W w a~ 3 Z 2 Q p~ a p~ m 2 ~~ O a w~ a~ z z>~~ J O °~ ° _~ ~ Y S Z Z_ O O O U J w a v> > O U a w~ J o ~~~~ m o~~ Q°~~ w Q~ Z~~ I- ~ a a z U j= W~ a~~ ~~ W S O- W U S Z a W 2 W_ W o 2 Y U o w F- W O (~ ~ Z= W O yaaZ W>USOJZZZ(n>O~J~JQ}ZUU-O ~Z J ~ww~O~00a02a>~~ JQw W 0`~C~~}~apzmu,aJO0aw0 ZYOU~mC7~oUUW WO(~WJLLC~~}ZmJmo3W WJ~32mF-~o • • ~~~~~6 • • NM OCO1~000OrNM~f rNM ~0ti000AOrNM ~tOf~OCAOrrNMp M M ~ M M M M M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ O O O 0 t0 CO t0 CD ~ CO t0 CO CO CO f~ I~ Q O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ el ~ ~ of er ~ tt ~' et ~ ~ ~ of ~ ~ d' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ O O 00 r r r r r TrT r r r r r r r TrT TrT T r r r TrT r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r M~~~~ C~ c~ M M M c) M M c 0o M M M M M c 00 M M M M M M M M M M c~ c~ c O') c ~ cO~ M t 00 ~ _N N ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~ l1~ ~ of ~ ~ to O ~ O 0 O CA O to 1~ f~ f~ ONO 00 00 r 00 00 CA O O CA "' ~ r LC! r r r r r r r~ r r r Ln r r N 1[~ N O N r r r Ln r r O r r r COtO 1~1~ COOMCOCOCOCOCOCO CO CO COI~COCOf~OI~OrCOCOCONCOCONtOCOCO ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~M~QM~~~4~~~'~~~ ~o~oo oo~ooooo0 ooovo~oNOOOOO^~o~~o~a~~ ~i~iuQi~i~i ~°n~°u°~~°nu°~~i.u°~~°n~°n°n~°n~°n~°n~~i~°~°nu°~u~~i~i~ii~~°nv~°i~ic~i~ii~u°~ w c~ o~ o~ o~ v~ w rn o~ o~ c~ o~ rn w rn rn c~ rn w a~ rn rn rn rn rn rn rn o~ rn c~ w o~ o~ w w aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU w J aaaaa~aagaaaaaa aaaoaaa a (~ C9 (~ C9 (~ U' (~ (~ C9 C9 C9 C9 C7 W (~ C9 (~ ? C9 C9 C9 C~ 00000000~000000~000~000}0 ~a~a~a~aa4Qa~gaz~~a~a~~aa~z~a~a~a~a4a~a~aq aaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaa~aaa-a cnv~cncnv~3cncncncncncnv~cnv~cncncncnUV~cncnc~v~ z W aaaaa aaWaaa c~oc~ozoc~~c~oc~ ooooWooWooo w z a ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~NN~~~ca/~ U ~ a W O O > Z Q > > > > > > a > > > ~ > > > > ~ > > > > > ~ > >> p p~ a J 3 a a a a a a a a a a o a a p a o a o a a a a a a a a a aa~~pa~ aaaQQaC~aQaQ'aa~Od'}a}}} ~-~}_}}} ~ZZ 2wC~==225=02=2w2=p~p00000rO0U000 appOO~E-az~~i--~-~-~-~~~-~YH~-~Q~U UvU~UU~UUU lL F-HJ~ZJ~~a'a'~~a~a'~UQ'~- ~ N U~~uS~~a~Jaaaaaa~aaa~aa~3~Uw000xUU UUU tl) r O M M ~ r 00 CA Cp r' I~ CO O 00 _N CO O) CO N to M O r 1~ r 1~ m to In 1~ N _O 00 ~Q ~Q M ~ ~ ~ CNO t~0 C00 CEO C~O COO 1l~ CNO CO ~ 000 COA ~ ~ O ~ CNC1 N t~ ~ ~ O ~ <C l~ ~ CO ~ "~"/~O~m rOD00MOM 00000OD00 0000~CD0000 OOOOOOMMr 00~ M 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 00 00 00 •- r r r r CO r r N r r r r r r r r r r N r r r r r r N r r r a r r r r r r W V ~ W Q W W fn F- p ~ -~ J W fn fn Q W~~ J d' J J I- O ~ a w w O ~ - w > >- ~ w- ~'- -_ _ ->--~- -- v -z- f- ~ _ _ - _ _ w -a fl w t~-~ -a- _ __ _ u~ _Q_ W - p a g ~ W WZ------ww~OY~cn z~~ a a J=1-z~~j -~a W~~w~J(' aOZOUWp 2w=ZO~UQm aW ~w p F- F-pOJaW ~~a~p3a OWUp~'ots~isN -~a WO= a~ a'~}aoif~°~DUJ~Z~°i~~o~S °iS~otS=aH~W~°~SoiSa(A~~ ~wz ~~~pQaQprsw°a~z~~~sa U~U~ts~WwotsYOa~cn°~z ~~'QC7~u~°~>zOcnW~Waa~= ~ wF-~a~m=aVwW,a~z~ O a= z~ w~ Q Q~ g cn W a O Q W w 3= W J W~ o cn Q~ w o a z z O Z~ ~ O>>~ z O Y a a w z Q~~ W z w a =' ~ ~ w} p~ a~ w= Q~ O Q a Z~ W~~ O¢~~ a 3~~ W~ a O m z a}~= a a U~ -~ ~ LL~ U J J~~ ~W ~O UW~oOQ-~ zZ-W==~~OYZ>>JJLL~3aC700O Q p Z a d=~~ Z= W Y~ Z~~ -- ~ Y U H= cn ~ U a Q W Jp a Z z d} 0 0 0 pZ J)'-Vr UW ~OpWOWW W WQ~~Q~WQ2F-~ Ha ~IAZ~ =o =Qz~zozo~wJCnm--~'~~n a zOZUO~~Q~3~QYY}-a W Q~ J= O a a F- Q Z p Q a W W a a J a V~ LL W a W O O~~ W~= W 2~ N J LL 2 a U o m~ cq Y O c!J m J>~~ a a~~ Y}= 2 J Y~ o U (A m a a U 1 i O ~ ~~ ~ L~~~~' • O OD ~ c0 f~ 00 Q~ O ~ N M ~ to cD I~ 00 O c0 I~ 00 O) O ~ c0 1~ 00 G) O ~ N M ~ O cc I~ oD ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N~ O In lf~ LA In c0 CO 00 O O 00 O O 01 O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v v ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d0' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ r r- O ~~ppoDC01~1~I~0000000r-~O~ O O O ~ O O M f~ ~ I~ O I~ f~ I~ I~ cD ~ cD MNOOOO~~N~ O~r'~0~~~-f..-00000000 NNMMNONNON tC I~ I~ I~ f~ f~ f~ ~ f~ O P I~ I~ f~ I~ ~ f~ f~ I~ 1~ 1~ 1~ 1~ ~ t~ 1~ 1~ f~ f~ I~ 00 I~ OO 0000000000 o i•o OOO o000 o ao ~~ti ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ oo~ 000000000 00~~ oooi~i~i~i~i~i~°ni~iic~~ii~il~°~ aaaaaaa U U U U U U U U aaa~aaa c~oc~zc~oc~ ooo~ooo ~a~a~z~aa~a~ a a a a a a a mmmmmmm aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU Z agaaaaa as a °aaaaaaaaaaaaaaWa C7 C9 C9 C9C~C~ WC~C~WU' ~zU' CCU' C9 C7 C9 C9 C9 C9 C9 C9 C7 C9 C9JaC9 o~ooooo~ooNoaaooooo000000000~0 ~z~~~~~z~~z~z~~a~a~~~~~~a~~~~~z~ a a a a a a a a a a a a O J a a a a a a a a a a a a a a~ a cnc~cncncncncnv~v~cncncn~av~v~cncncncnv~c~cncncnc~cncncncn ° Q ~ = O O ° a a a ° ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ° ~pOF-000~w UHUcnUUHa~ U~UWUU~3Z ~C7~O~~C'lt~W 00 Q1 f~ d ~ O M N ° OOM ~pf~000~D M M ~ ~ ~ 0~0 M ~ ~- ~~~rn.-r-~~N u m ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ Z ~~~~~~~ ~ W W W W W W W O °° ~ ~ Q ~ 0 ~ ~}~~~0~~ ~ ~»»» F-f-HH F-H H O> O O O O O O O Z a a a a a a >- J J J J J J J J ~>~~~~-~~ ~ azzzzzz3mmmm°mm m =Y===~-__ =rnU000000wmm~~LLm~~~ ~-aF-F---(nF-H.~~~ZfAfnfnfnfnf~-W W W WHW WOW QOQQac~i~aavaimwwwwwwz°zzzz~zmz°~°z cn O c~ v~ cn LL u~ c~ x c~ x° U U U U U U~»» m p» x> ~~~ c~ N Z rn j c Op m O m O~ N O O N M c O~ N ~ O~ C° ~0 O N m~ ~ M~~ ~ CO M M O~ O ~ O 00 M000000~-0000 00~00~0 0~0O~OC~OM~C~O~CMO~~~ W W = W J a W N~ W J Z ~-7f~!1~ W W a a » ~ a w~ J~ W W H m W ° _ _ _ ___ ~ ~ ~ ~ __ W _ ° _. J _U-~ W °..~_ _ _ __ _..~ ~ J _ _~ W O -~ oZSLL~J Qw~O F- Q~w~=-~ ~f'za ~w I- W ~ ZW-W ~fl1m w~w~Om°~Q ~.-~ Hw fn ~ W a~'~~ C7~~J W~-~LLa°aJH-? aw°~ a= =~~S = C7}°~ O~~aJ H~~~SZa~a-~ WJ~ ~a ~ (~ W ~ WH maZ cnF-~ OH J Z}~ W= h-°~-~,~ ~JotS~ a°~OF-} Z=w,~Z~z~S~otSW ~aa --cn U ° =tea aZW ~ J W F- cnaU Jp~-Wots }O~QZYgowo°ZJ~aQV~~ w~pQaWZwmN=aaQ oa°Qn-LL_ ~ ti Z Z a~ m~ Q a D UJ = m a a~ LL LL= 2~ O- m~ W U°} w>~~ O~ a~~OmaaYZ»z~~~c~a azUZ~>Oa~gza z a =U °m~~ O a}~aa 2J~JQ awOm°°a°~LLOa~pa- a z E- m zpJpw>~=mom-z z}LLm>ja ~ ~zazw~~Q°~.°~w cna az= ~ zw=03 wLLaW 4~a uJ O W a O W=~ Y W W~ H D~~ J> W N Z W~ J m~~~~ J W J° Z W H >~Ja~=C9 LL Za'~U W 21iJ~~LLJama' JLU ~ Oa'°2J°aJZa' ~~ai°0o0~°OV~~°WQ°?J=gaO~Na=a?U=°aaaa U=C~cn~m~=am=~ammc7~aJc~F-~cc~u~LL~~ULLJCna~°cn~cn • L ~~~~8 O~O~c~~cD1~00 WON ANN NNNNNMtn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 00 OD 00 OD 00 CO CO GO 00 f~ N N N N N N N N N N M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g~a~a~~~~~~ r N 1l1 ~" ~~~I~M~MMMMO f~NN~~O~~~~O O O ptip pp ~tip pp~ p~p ~ Q~ ~pp ~ In 1A 1t~ lf) IA lOA ~ to C1 W O 01 O W O O 01 Q a a a a a a a a a a UUUUUUUUUUU W a a a a a a a a C7 C9 C7 C7 C9C~C7W y~000 OOOON OHQFQ-Hf-p~~~~0 ~aa~~mcai~cai~vaicancan f- ~ ~ Z M O _J _J a d' a ~ ~ ~ Q' 0 m m Z 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ W ~ W W ~ ~ a > > > > g ~.Op~~30~~0 ~zZW~o~~~~a a Z J ~ Z»» W x»Ua-aaaa= Oo~~oo3 Noaof' m~DOOtOO MNON Oo~a~a~a~c~i o~a`~~rn w V ~ a ~ ~ a a a a ~W W In - __ Z. LLl ~ Z ~ ~ ~~ Q 0 W Q ~ wo Q z~ ~oc~~ ~. J ~U2o0ots ~ C9°~ZWa-» ~ Z WOp~otSq~ W U J°~WOJ~q~~Z J ~~C~oaz ZW aZ~'QW WJ~~~C9 = W Z Z oQ~°~a~°Qa= a~~az =o a~3cn=cn~a~iiU~ L ~~~~~ • Attachment 6 • ~~~:~© Salim Sagarchi SEI Corporation 14524 Oak Street Saratoga, CA 95070 October 4, 2004 Ms. Ann Welsh Assistant Planner, AICP City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 Dear Ann, Regarding the neighborhood meeting requested by the Planning Commission, we would like to inform you that after a couple of attempts, we were able to meet with the neighbors to review the final construction plans on May 8, 200,4. many attempts were made to contact the neighbors via phone and fliers. With the a ception of two, all other immediate neighbors were present at the meeting. During this meeting the construction plans were presented to th neighbors and the elevation and design details were reviewed. All who were present approved these plans unanimously and signed the "Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application" which was submitted to you already. They were also anxious for us to start and finish this project ASAP, as the finished project would add value to the neighborhood. There were several attempts made to meet with one of the two immediate neighbors that were not present at the meeting. Several phone calls, personal meetings requests at his house, invitation to the neighborhood meetings, and visits to his residence have failed to get him to review ow plans. These plans were changed due to his personal requests during the planning commission meeting and afterwards. He refused to show up in 4 pre- agreed meeting dates, never returned more than 10 voicemails, and refused to attend the last two meetings. Best Regards, Salim Sagarchi ~4~+42 Open House Invitation ~ Sunday, May 6, 2004 1 HOSt: SEI Enterprise Location: Dorcich Orchard, 13089 Quito Road, in Saratoga Time: Thursday Mat 6, from 5:00 to 7:00 pm. I ~ I Please come and review our development plans. Meet the developers, ask them questions, check out the detailed plans and give them your feedback. ~~~~~~~ Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Ouito Road. Saratoga, CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not loaf favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta,~"and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the Ci of Saratoga. My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I nderstand the scope of work and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed projecK. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Name: ~ ~ 9~0~ Neighbor Address: // _ _ _ _ __ _ -- -_-_ ~-~~J-ti_~~r~ ~~~~ Neighbor Phone #: `"14 $ ~- 37 9- 9' y~~ Signature: Printed: • (.'itv cf,~irnlnQn Plnnninv ne»art»w~~~'~ Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Quito Road. Saratoga. CA Applicant Name: _ SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues whe» solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Staj,~'and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative ofall residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may rese a the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City atoga My signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any conce ~ or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public ' 'ng on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: i have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Name: ~ ~ ~ ` ~ h ~ ~'~- & o ' Y L~ ~1 Neighbor Address: _ __ ~'~ O ~ 3 /Q ~i f. ~ aC. Neighbor Phone #: ~ 08~ 3 7a. ' ~ ~ ~ Printed: • • PlnnninQ nennrtment~"~~~~t'~ ('itv nf,Carntnvn • Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Ouito Road, Saratoga, CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: • • The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta,~''and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express arty concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative ofall residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the C~~ity~~ of Saratoga. hd"My signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; I understand the scone of work: and I do NOT have any conce ns or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Address:- ~- ~ C ('itv nf~SnrntnQn ~^ Neighbor Phone #: ~ ~ J Printed: PlnnninQ nenartment ~ ~~g~s Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Quito Road, Saratoga, CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Stajj''and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of oll residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga My signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any conce or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewe the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. ~ I Neighbor Name: ~ ~ ~.-~f.+r ~ Z d St ~'~'~-~ ~ S Neighbor Address: _ _ ~~~Wt;.~-r~q ~ lam, 9 ~ ~ 70 Neighbor Phone #: ~D~ - ~~0 ' ~ 0~ Signature: .i n rat~va , Printed: • ~~. ice.,- ~ ~~ ~ i Planninv nenarimen~~'~~'~~ • C~ Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Quito Road. Saratoga, CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta,,~''and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative ofall residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City f Saratoga , , signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I do NOT have any conce or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):, Neighbor Name: Neighbor Address: ~s~' y ~ _ G ~~ ~.~ Signature: s ~ G Neighbor Phone #: 7~0 ~/ / ~-'~ Printed: ~~ (~GZ FEZ ~~~~~ (.'itv of ~4nrntnvn Plnnninv nenartment Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: ~. Z ~f - U `~ PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Ouito Road Saratoga. CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta,,~"and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City o Saratoga. y signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any conce or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Name:~G~:~l I ~~~~ ~ (~ r ~~~ y _ __ _ _ - ....Neighbor Address: _ ,~ l ~5 O~ v Neighbor Phone #: ~ 7 0 - ~J ~~ Signature.'' ~ Printed: ~ ! • ~ ~, iZ i 4„ ~0~~8 !'.itv n!'~Srirntnaa Planninv nenartmen xoJ il.rf•Irl.•olf 1 • i r. ~ ~ s •1 r !. •o l f Lf.O-110-68E fNd~/ /~~ ~ y~ ~~y ~~~Jyy`t~l'JOlVdVS O • f f r ~I 7 71 tl `I M 0 N ~`/Q O.iR IV VOW~~O V 1'7~Jav ~ ~ r iN~I NOflllp1f011 If7f n T 'Ilr 11i1fA011 Mlli~l ~ Iw lr~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' S1~3UH~l~d ~, ; ~~" F- ~3LS~0~ ~~~ Z# 101 ~Sf10H MAN ~ I~JU LJ ~ U O~ Q ~j UO VJ ~ O a ~ c~ • ~ ~} ~~ : ~ ~ ~~ ~~ a~~ F~~ ~ ~ ~ o~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ - ~ -~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~F ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ y ~~ ~ y+ ~ ~~ o ~ ~ ~ F .. ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~o ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ J ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ Y~~ g~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ sF Z ~ ~ f ~~ ~~ ~F ~ ~' a~~ ~ M • ~ ~ 0. J w ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ Z ~ ~~_ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ - W ~ ~ _~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ _ ti d ~ ri i r N ~' ~ ~~ •~ ~ ~iv ~~~ O ~ 1 uF U ~O~ X~ ~ ~~~ o ~_~~ W a ~~~~~ FFFF ~~~~~ ~~~~~ gg~~~ w ~~ ~ S~ ~~ ~ - ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ } ««< o~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ X ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ «F _ iC ~~ ~ F S5 `~ ~ll~~` JJ J N .~ LL ~ Q 4/ ~ ~ ~ N ZYO ~ a ~JO O m ~ r Q~r-Q~ ~ m ~ . . ~~cwnrn a } m 0 w 0 S 0 a 0 a 0 ~~ J r-- ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :::~ J ~1„ Q :~ R. O -z_ ~ - ~ o 1 -~IC 1 ~ I I n O I I I I I I .~ ' m rFF ~I~ \\\ 0 r-, u, O z i ' dll -~ 1 \ 1 .SZ "'r i ~ f ~ ~ L~__ ~ r ,c ~ 1 LLC'L~ I ____ - ~~((4 N OIL v{~~ Z U 5 JI= 4 ~-- ly' Cmm~~ lLI VZ ~3 ~~ ~S 1 < ~ -- m V ~K ~ ~rv ~ ~~ z n~ a '1' ,LL 53W1IA 1 ~, ` (/ ~ (~~ '~ I\ / \~/ ~! i~ ~~ ~ 1 1 1 ~ '~ 1 3„sz,a~.aa~ ~ Yt Nlno ,ti- ,LS ,l~9'Su -~ __ / 6 ~ ' .~ ~~N~INEER~cd\ Q~' 'y a ~ ~, ~ ~ o J L7 ~ ti J Q W N ~h ~ V "~ U ~ ~~ o a ~ P \~31S~93~%~/ _' ?_i~ -I= G f~l ~~ >, .~ [Li I Z f\_ 4 ~ ~ g I ~~ e U ~~ .7 ~~~++g~y1+~< ~ b '~' ~ f. Zt7iN of F` a < <? W W fib _ _ 8 ~ Z O ~b~` `$<~ `- ai • "~ s Z z N ~ ~ n ~ Z< NT1Y ~, a z i ~ ~ _ ___._. ..____~ [ G ~ O FO ~ ~ '~~~ ~ ...___.... '. _ ,. - ' ~ ~ O N ~ O . ,SL b 6 i° ~' ~ i ~ ~ ; ._ f w ~: C~ t- r' R Z ~ ~ Q?,~' i "~ t` O N rte, v ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ Q~~~ 2 ~ ., ~~ c~ ~ ~ ~~i~ i U Q S2~~ ~' ~ ~~ ~ o~ ~ ! - ~ ~ .t ,r. ~ ~ iV .x .e ~ - ~ +--jO ~ ~' __ - ---_. a I I i - ~ i ~ 'on o v 0 ~o ~ I N y a i I ~ a . _ _ _ ~~ , ~ ~'i> m i re I v j¢ v;ii7i~ ~ ~' Q N 'b ep lJ ~ ~ `~~ Z Z .~ ~ ~O ..__ ~' 1 ~ 1 ° ~ ..~....:.. ,., ,u •s~, s,~. ~~._--- ,_. r~ , i~ l ~~. •, _.~ AMO .u i ~' ,. _ ,~ , --- ...~ r~r~ In 17 1 ~ 11 j ~ f I; ~ ~ ~ / tD `- 1 ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ^ ~\ ~ "~ ~ ~ ~ ~, o a / ~ \ ~ M w d ig I ~, AMO ! t _..~ ~ 3 u. ~ ~~~ ~ / p / / \ ~ \ ~. ~ ~ 4 \ ~ / \ ~ ~ `~`. T'U31Y1 A2IV11NV5 ~<-~`1- u1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( o= ~ ~ ~ A ~1~`, ~yJ Z '~ '4 0 ` I~ ; ~~~ .au ( ~-._ f h - ~ ~ f sI ~ ~ ~ i I ' ~ tl b ~.-~ I ' i I ~ ~. ~ - /~ /'~ ~ k K~. i ~ ( I ~ I ~, i ~ ~ ) :~; r7 ~~ ~ ~ ( ~ e y / u71 ~~~ ti H II v 1 ~ °`~- -~ ~ ~~tl / ~ ~-- ® I \ -r ~ \ ~ ' ~ ~ 14,0 .t9 1tJ1(Of. \~ •-Z'C~liq a"1 , ~ .i !: dAl ,Sz 1 ' ~ ~ ~' ,~ ^, LJ s L ~i Yl NMO .1- ,tiS n rv \ ~ ~ ~ .3•~.d 0 ~ ~~ 0 ~ i I O .~~~ • Qc. o ~ ~ i o `, ~~ \~/ T 9` ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ , ~ _ \`` ' ~ %/'; ~ . ~ ~ i j / ~ so t` i, ~ M // 1 ~ ._. ... J ~ ar. ~ ~ ~ra3tri ~avl~ 1 ~ ~ / ~~ ~ :: ~., r ~ ~ ~~ / rtr `J ' I 4 i tt > h o /V, r 1 _ ~- ~ " ~~ Y - ~~ ~. Cr I, ~ ~~w _ ~I n _ \ ~> ~ i ~~ ~ U \ ~~___ ~, o ~~~ c, i ~_`-~- - - - - ~~ .3.~d .ot s -- ~ ~~ ; ~n0 I I ~ ~~ 4~ -- ___T __ I ~ um~,u I i ~: • • o I ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~G 1 N E E` ~ yy i ~ ~ Q ~ ~ d P a ~ ~ ~ q i w~~' _ ~ ~ H ~ p~J < W ~ ~ r~ U ti "'~ ~ r~r~~ ~ CV ~ Q ~ ~~ I O~ 1 I Y .. c.1 '. ~ ~~ ~ ~g ~ ~ ~ 1 I Q Z c0 I O ~ J Q ~ h ,~ ~ 4 6 ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ j & ~ 5 ~ z ff ~ ~ i~~ Z ~ ~ ~ u i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ $ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I q ~ WgZ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "''1111 % I ~ I ~ ~+J 8 -r--r---- - 9~ O O O 'Q ~ a ~ 1 4 ~, ' Lc~, y~ R 3 V _ 3 l.J ~ J p JW w V ly J ~ y'~ V _ ~ F ~ ~ ~ W J ~ W <() W ~ S py 5 > ~V! I r `. ~ ^S Q W z OC Itl'.i - Vi W n 1~ _._-.___ . C O ~ ~ Z ~ ¢<~~ ~ 7~ = li{ F VI ~ y J pa0[ ~ '< W i ZW 4 / f~Y m p p F ~yUjJ~ Z ~ < W C ~ 0. ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ W ~ 2 ~ ) F F y~1~ y ~ F O W y,~ ` p K ~ m iJ yN/ y~ y~ ~ ~ S~ ~~y m m 0 ~ J ( ~ s S ~ ~ ~ ~ S i k' ~Pi ~ ~ '~ a= R5K~ ~ ~ ~ Z Z ~ Q~ Z y ~ a~ ~ ~ F~ ~ ~y `3 a$ f~ll gCi Q ~o ~o Z W w J ( J ~ J ( W W W W W W W W ® 1 I JJ 88 W W J ~ _? >i S ~ V V V W 4~ W c' d a~ ~ 71f O; y W 1 J ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ig 1 ~ O ~~~ V I I I pg J p aa < m (J U U W~ 1-i k W G IVi ~ T? p n pp U a d 6 O m y~ ~( VI 1311 FV- i f N x ~~~ O I I ~~ J ~ I 1 Z .L{ m ~~ I^_ __ ~ 2 ~0 5 ._ I y~l ~ l xz ~ m --~ , ~j ~ - ,~ ` i .f ~ -- V V m 6 Y I ~ ~ O a~ V ~ ~ < ~~ i J O J ~ to ~ I <? ~ m ~ 1 \ Y = ? <U' ~ a I I i~i 1 •I _.Z .Bl - I I I I O ~ W ~ ~ I ~ ~ i __ z - ~ _ w I I+ v ~ ~b ~ ~ - Sg ~ ~ _ ~:- 3 ~~ W ~ ~ I "aa W ~J ~(~ ~~~ 3 ~ '.~i ~ ~J ~~1 N Z~ x30 {Fn, I g ~! ~ < , j - ` F- . 1 $ W ~ ~~~ ~' WW ' O ~ ` - i~ ? ~Z ~ ~ ~ ZZ ~O a Z 3 W c k' 11 f ~~ ~ !! ~+I h~ I ~ .ya j _ . F ~ "1I ~ Z ~~ ` W< ! I w3 ~ ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ b ~ i i_I ~ ~ I 'j I .J ~ ~ I ) /, ~ ~ ~ ~ > I ~ < ~ i I I----: s i ~ - _ c i s( I I I I i • • ~. ~- Y CI~~iIN!! ltlM3 ~ riy.a ] e E g -. -. ~ O • 1 !N 1 _ ~, g b j R b` ~ G, ~ n ~ o r a 1 ~$ ~ ' ..3 ' ~ ~ ~~ N - ~> ~ y ~ ; ~ ~ ~< ~, / it ~ ii !~ 1~ / j1 Y 1 1~ 1 l,~ ~ 1 i I ' ! '' // ~ /J ~ us 'ex~s xaJ ~ I 1 ' %~ ~~ ~ ~ ! r i I / ! ~v ~ I ~ I 1 ~i ~ ~~ PLO / ~ r£o ro-eB£ T 1 , ~~~~ / P~~' ~ ~°~`°''~ 1 ~rt~~ xa S•£SZ=' .SI,IQ N I~ - J ® S ~£o-rro-ea£ ~ L•us ~a xa J 1 1 + ~ R ; ozo-ato-£or i/ ~ ii i ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~~5~ ~ P 1 ~'\ \ ~ \ ~ ~ \ n no ~ ~ ~ i 1 ~ wo-ezo-ro- l 1 1 1 I ~__ ~ o ~ ~ ~~ ~\ l J ~ 1, `~ 1, ~ J I t ~~ ~~ ~ `J ~J ~ ~ \~ ~ 141 I S ~ ~ ~ ~ \ 9Z 81C88N 1 SZi ~ ~~ M„lst~ L95~ L _ 1 ~ zzo-tm-ro- r l •~ I 1~\ l\ t t IX i° ~/ ~\ ~l \ \~ o~ 1 1 03M5 ~ ` J J ` J 1 0 \ ~\ ~ 1 / ~ ~ ~ ~ \ 1 x sNa sr ~ ~, ~~ O ~~ i t l ~ I -k~J `~ ~ ~~ I ~ h i s cv r ~ ~ 045 l l8S - - ~ ~ ` I # ~ ` J ~ J \ .~ 1 1 ~ 1 1 Y r l 1 j ~ 1 `~ ~ ~ ~ ' 1 t gl r ~ ' n- ~ ~~sr ~ ~- O ~ 1 ~~ 1 ~ 1D C0 ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ - tt ~ ~O ~_ f 3 I p ~e® 1~ •~ ~ 1 1 W _1 ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ I i 1 _J ` / ~ I ~ 1 O ~ / ~ ~ N ~ \ ~ \ ~ ~ 1 i rzo-cto-£a 1 ~ ac ~ ~o a ;s ~ ~ ~ Z `J `~ ~~ \ 1 ~ 1 ~ j i ~ r _____ -- - ~` ~; ~ t -- ~ I 1 $ 1 S,(` f 'f' - __ _~ / ~ on~R LSO--l0-6B£ ~ I I BSO-f10-CBC _ ~ - ~ -~ •. ~ ~ _ ~~ ~ s NW n r~(pS 1 ~ ~ ~ ' ~1 ~ ~ 1 I i I oeo-fro-ee£ _ ~ a~ R R ~_ - 1 ~ ~ 1 1a ~ II.L~~~ ' ~- 1 1 - Z_~ ,-L-1_-~ 1 ~--1- a--- ~ i ~ I I us DNS x3 f ~ eso-f ro-eB£ i ~ ~ - - - - - ~ 1 ~ t, ` I us xacs xa I us ,~~ •xa j 1 ~ I 1 I r'u'+ao~a i 1 I I 1 I i - 1 1 I ( ~ 1 I 1 1 ~ 1 ' 1 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ I 8 1{3 ' ~ ~I~ II - toot e: xo a: r: ;~o :~a ac -tfl3~~-Br.r~ossl5~r~ r xoJ LL1~i'IrL'Oli O I •1 L L f i 'I r L 'o I: LEQ'~-~ '1Ndd b0 `VOOldddS i /~ V N o i i a~i s i o ti v v is ~dOd O1N10 ~OEI-dHVH.?d0 HJI:~N " e'~, vlv ~~is~o~l Nlli)1 `~`a ~ ~ !S~ u N ~1., 'a i N-I~IV~VS Y~1tiS ~~^ ~~ ~ (n S10311HO~Ib ~Sf10H MAN ~J~ ~`" z ~13LSJlO~J Hll~~l i i i i ~ ! i i i i -._._._._.I_._._._._._i._._._._._._._.~ ~ ovo~ oaino ---- I I` ~ I 61 I I I ~ I I ~ I ~ I i I i -~---~1 ~ ~ _~ _ .Ku zaaiaw+ f~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~~ I ~~ ~ ~ ~ I l~ I ~~ ~~~ _,r'\ `\`~ \,~~ `\ ___ ~\ 1 1 a-aa 1i 1 $I ~~ ___ _~~~ i I V _~--__~ ~- /. I i i i i ~~- i I I ~~- I I I I I I I I • • xeJ LL1'i'Ir1'Oli 1. 1 L L f i •) r 1 'O l i L4v- I~F~VBii *1~01I ~~ ~l~ oasrr 'vv '~I>,IVMaN i /~ 1/ N O ~ 1 11 i ~ O 11 I O ~ f V I~/ 11a11.tOi1 N11a)1 V V ~ QJ.p 1v VOVV~-~Ja ~I 1"I~JO~J ~`t `~ ,, '^ ~~" T I rw-ro-s ~ ~~rods 510311HO~Ib Z 101 ~Sf lOH MAN ~~ U ~,`L ~ fI~ ~131SJ10l~ Hll~~l ~ ~~ . ~ ~~~ ~l d ~ ~~~ mo 1 a f1 O ~ H~OO ~; ~ ~~ ~91y J ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ b vJ~ ~~ ~ ~'~ fi dul' ~ ~y ~ , Ig'Z ~o - . m~ ,. ~ § .. . ~ ~ -. .- , . • ~ .~ ~, ~' - . _ I ~ ~ ~ ~. m ~ I s0 ~ ~ ...~. .r ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I. - ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ - •~ ~~ ~ _ ~. ~ ~ I I ~ r I~ ~ I .. .~.' .. . I I to N I ,-- o ~ I ui m N~ O ~ i zl I m,~ ol~ I 4 J~ I r I ~~ I ~ , ^t`p I ~ I I I I I I i I ~ I ~ , ~~ •~ ••. I I I .~ I I I I I ~ . ... I •: - .. I I sp ---- J I ~ I ~----- - - ---------------J I L----- I I 4 I ~ ~ A I I I I ' I I N O X01 &9 I I ~ ^.. «.. I ( , _T ' i ' I ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ iil ~ L ~ I , ~h ~ t' ~ I I i ~ ~ I I I ~ I ~ II, ~ ~ I I -~ I ~- ~. _.__ ~ :. ~~_ __~- - _ _ I ~ I r ~ ~ ~ ~ ' I~ j ! ~ ~ ~ ~' i ~ _ ~~\ ~ ~ I I I - x•~ Lr.fs•Irl.•olsa 1 •1 lr ~ ~ ~ •1 r i •o l s LEO~VtO-68E fNdV ~dJ `~.)Olddtf8 Olifr 1IJ')Ii11/MiN yr~ • ~ 7AY NOl111il011 101! ~~ ~~N ~~~ F ,~ VI'd'~Iil•JlOil Nlli71 ~ ~ ~~ Ti ~I~IVJt/S YVr1dS ~ ~ ~ S10~lIHO~Ib Z 101 ~"' • ~~" z Q ~131SJ10~1 ~~~ ~Sf lOH MAN ~ >t ~ i - ~ •, ~. ~, ~ oar -- - v°so ~ I v°~o '~ - - ____ ._ _ I~ _ ~~ ~~_ . . -, _ -_-__-_ o~ -~--- .~ryl . i ~ i i _~ _~ ~~_ ~ ~ ~ ,, - ~ ~ ,, ~~ ~~ o ~ _~ 1 f• •, ~ ~\ r _ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ v ~' ~~~ ~~ r ~:! L Z19C._~... . ~., . I O - Z ^ (_ __ ~ - - - - ~ _ ~~ ~-'1 1_____.. __. _.. _. _. ~ -~~ _ ~ ~ ~ y ~R ~ ~~ a III -~.---x ~. `~' ~~ I~~l~.__ _ _ __ _ ~ ~ ~~ ,=~:~_ ~~~ i i • • • ~~ x.~ ~.~fs•I~L•ols 1• i L i f~ •1 ~~ •o l w Lf.O-~ti0-68f. ~NdV bJ `VOOl~S 01ifr 1/O '~Iil1/MiN • ~ •s n v N o~ i al s a o al I o n s AVON OJ1f10 680EX-dNVH~NO H `~ '~ (V Y1~/ 11ils.lOil Nlli~l N~'JNVJVS WINS ~ ~ ~ S103UHO~Id ~~, ~~~ z Q ~131SJlO~J ~~~ Z 101 ~Sf lOH MAN ~ .. .. -~ oroc 1 OCOC OGOC 1 - M ~\ OCOC ~ -Y ~~ ~ W !~ ® ?~ ~ o p~ M i ~~~~~ ---- ~a © o i O • w /~ ` 5 , ~`, 1 ' t \ ``\~` \~ ~; ~ ~__ ~,7p~ y 1 1 VVV I - ~ I L~~~~~~~~~~~ l 1 1 ~ 1 1 ~ ~ 1 1 1 ~ 1 I 1 1 ~ 1 I ~ i I 1 1 I I - ~ 1 1 1 1 • ~ ( 1 1___________~ 1 L • ____~~_____ 1 -'---------------------- - - 1 1 I j ~} i l I I 1 ' ' 1 ~ `- ~ I ` _ _~j I -- -- _ ----- -- -- - -- ___.` -- - XeJ LLfi'I-L"Oli I.1 Llff'I-L'OIf L4~TrK/~71r0Y YJ~11/QY~ o ~ s ~ - ~rr ~ ~I al 1/ M i N ~/Od 01x10 ~-~~H~ 7/~~I NO~111>tY011 Ifff ~~ 1( vlr ~1i1~~1011 Nlli~l ~~ ~ ~ M tttiii S1~311H0~ Z ~, ~~ z Q l~31SJ10~! ~~~ 101 ~Sf lOH MSN ~ 1 • • xvr LLyf'Irl'Olf 1~1 Llff'Irl'Olf O~ffr 'I7 y111VMiN 7N'r NOf111il011 If7f 1/11/ 11i1f~lOf1 Mlli~l S1~~1.IH~`d ~13LSJl0~l I-W~~I LEO-til0-68~ ~1Ndb ~~,/ ~y 1~~ `V~JOlbdbS V Y ~ O~ VOV4i' ids r~-ros Z 101 ~Sf10H MAN ~f~' n r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g U ~ If ~ •- 1 xnJ LLfi'Ir1'Oli I •1 L L> s •I r l •o l i LEO-fi'1~0-68f. ~Nd11 ~VJ `~OOlVdd's ~c 'i H V N O.1 i' O 11 yl 4 I i ~~ O~~ ~~~ ~ ~4" ~ r~'~ `I14I 11i1~.t0~1 Mlli~l S10 yes ra-ro-s ~ ~ i ~ 3UH0~1`d ~, . ~~" z Q ~13LSJl0~l ~~~ Z 101 ~Sf10H MSN ~ • • x p r L L f i 'I r L 'O l i ~~,~,~/~~ ~~ ~y I •1 L L f i 'I r L 'O l i L4V-I H/"VSE *Iip ~I ~~ ~1~~~ o ,, s f r 'v o '~1 al v M a N ~~ Old -~dH~ ~ « r 7/11/ N01111alOil If7i 1/11/ ylaliA0i1 Mlli~l ~~ ~ ~.~ S1~~1.IH0~ld ~, ~~~" z Q l~3LSJlO~J ~~~ Z 101 ~Sf lOH MAN ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ t _ . ~~ ,. ~. W ~ ~ ~ ~I«yI~I+Id v~r d ~ ~ a '^ _ ad J F ~ ~ 7 ~ t ~ ~... ' ~ ~... ~ ~... y a t ~ ° j P d ^~ ~ ~,a~N- F ~ E K ~ ~... i f 9 g 3 ~ i.~ p... . ~ 3 ~'~ ~#a~ ~N~l~_ 3jr~ ~. . j ~ a ~~~! F N !1 < ~ ~' 6~[ *r. C ': `Y:: / ~ ~ I i 0 3. Y V J 8 8 ~ J z LM ~ 41y } i ~- a 'a ~ ~ N 4n9.Q ~ 8 ~I • g ~ ~ ~ ~ I Q 1 ~ i i }_.,, ,~ Y ------ ~--------J o • T ~ 2 ~ .i Pt ~ ~t • ~3. ~ Si b ~ ~ ~--- a 8 ~f +~ ~ ~ ~ X1\1 3 A1Y0 ~f iiJ.~~ • ~ c O 1 / '.._ ~~ ~ • ,._~ V a ~" .. ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ a~E ~ ~ av~, ,aon iss i~a ii~s { a ~ ~ • ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~~ s~ s s ~T e ~g ~ ~ 3 C ' 1 3-~ 1O Yuy i~Y~ ~~ ~ ~~ 1 33 ~ n ( e~ C Csx y,4 ~t~J ~ti~ PO )p~J ~oik e ~~ ~ a a F N ^ 0 ~ N7 V a i ° ~ o~~ z d ~ a SQ ~ F__ J Z U a a a p,~ Q ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ G ~ : ~~ ~ ~ ~ 2~ >+~ ~ ~ ~ f~ 3 $~ ~_ zz ~ ~. ~~ T T Q • r ~ -~-~ ;, „- __~- i .... 4 T ~3 0 a R ~~. 8 ::,..Q ---- ~. L~ ®®~~ {r~ o ^ ~s ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ g~ ~~~ <s - -r- . ~ ~ Q ~-' a ~_ T J ~, ~~ Y ~~. n 4 1 ~ d } ~~ ~~_ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ k k ~ ~ a,~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~, s ~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~ k ~ -u.ys 2- 0 • b~ .:i . ag 0 3 -- u g 3~i~sa vNtdvw t i i - I i I I I J I ;.~- i.' 1' ~- ~ 1 ~~ •I -~ ~ a i =. • I ~•, 1 ~~ (I .s ~ i_ ~ ,,. i ~~ ~ a ~ ~? ~Q ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ d G d °~ ~ P 1~yy v Q d zR~°~- .J G ~~ ~~~8 ,~ R z ~~ ~~~8°~~ ~ ~ ~ :~ ~~ ~ a ~ a ~~ .:: :r ; t: a a 0 Y ® a z r -- L 7 ® o~ s ~ ~. o~~ Obi k oRFF~ ~ f g ~ 7f V i ~~ ~ y Z D ~ ~' ® a ~;. a ~o~ ~ W $ ~~~~ ~g ~a t'. a s ~~ ,~ ~~gs ~~_ .~ ~~ ~_ .~ ~~ ~3 ~~~ ~_ ~ ~- goy ~~~ [~ ®.~~ tf~Til 'j~~~ f ~iII ~ illl L ~ `~ W Irl L ~ 4; ~~~ ~ 9 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ jl 1 a ~ n _ ~ ~ O N ~ O ~ ~~ Q~ ~~ J Z W a U Q Q ~~g, 4! I'~ l~J(1~~ H~IS~IDQ ~ S10~ SNb'~d 3db'~SQNd~ i V +~ ~ i S ~ ~ ~ ~ ._ +, ~ d ~ ~ ~ _ I ' ~ 3 L ~ N ~ O S ~ U1 ~ d O Q1 ~ O_ d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +-~ ' ~ ~~° ~~~ W d o a~ ~ ~ a~ •L U ,~n ~, ~o O -I~ E +~ 4 0 to Q d ~ ~ °' o ~ o ~ a U ~ 3 U U d ~ c~ U1 ~ ~ _, L L +' 4 O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d Q ~ d ~ U1 N ~ +' ~ i ~ ~ ~ +' d ' O i z ~ ~ ~ _ ~ Q N d U - _O ~ •- N ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ O_ 0 ~ O d ~ ~ O ~ O O U1 N ~ U ~' +> Q i£' ~ Q d ~ U ~ - E U ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ QJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~I ~ U ~ Q l7 ~ ~ ~ a, W ~ a ~, v,~~n v ~ ~ ~.~~ ~s ~ I- „~ ~ v a Q +' Q' ~ U ~ Q d o i ~ ~ i ~' +-' _ o, Z .~ ;d ~ucvoac~ am • L T $~ ~°~~ oo~r~~~ ~3~gti~ ~oeuy~ .°~~s~z~ ~agg~o QL 92 ' ~ oo~~~~•~ ~wo~n~~ - _ . CL o ~ ~ ~ '¢ E ~ ~ C a _ W U -~' -.. Q = n m A U z ~ ~ ~a~° • Item 3C e REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No./Location: 04-130/ 13089 Quito Road -Lot 3 Applicant/Owner: Salim Sagarchi Staff Planner: Ann Welsh, AICP, Associate Planner Date: November 10, 2004 APN: 389-14-37 Department Head: ~_._ O 500 ft radius _ ®13089 Quito Road 0 500 ft parcels I -1--- RD I I i I _ I MC FARLAND AV A1/ • ITO ^ I ~I -~- ~!~ i I - -- _ _ _ I _............_.. __ -r= 61~C~Y 0 100 200 300 400 500 ftl 13089 Quito Road -Lot 3 ~~iO~®~, # 04-130 /Design Review -Lot 3 13089 Quito Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY Application filed: Application complete: Notice published: Mailing completed: Posting completed: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 5/6/04 10/15/04 10/27/04 10/26/04 10/15/04 This Design Review application is a request to construct atwo-story structure on a 12,974 square foot lot located in the R-1,10,000 zoning district at the end of the cul-de sac, Dorcich Court. The home is designed in a neo-craftsman style with lap siding, lightweight concrete brown the roof. The home is located within a new subdivision that was the former site of the Dorcich Orchard. The home is intended to be compatible architecturally with the historic farmhouse that is retained on lot five of the subdivision. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Design Review application with conditions by adopting the Resolution for Application # 04-130. ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft Resolution 2. Key Map of Parcel 3. Arborist Report dated May 28, 2004. 4. Fire Department report dated May 25, 2004 5. Affidavit of Mailing 6. Neighborhood Correspondence 7. Plans, Exhibit "A" • ~ty~~®~ # 04-130 /Design Review -Lot 3 13089 Quito Road STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R-1,10,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: M-10 -Medium Density Residential MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE: 12,974 sc{uare feet AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: Average Slope of the lot is less than 10%. GRADING REQUIRED: No grading of the site is proposed. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed project consisting of asingle-family residence is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-family residences. The project site is in an urbanized area and is connected to utility and roadway infrastructure. MATERIALS AND COLORS PROPOSED: The house 1s to be lig t grey lap siding and dark grey trim with grey brown rock wainscoting and grey roof til • ~~4~3®3 # 04-130 /Design Review -Lot 3 13089 Quito Road LOT SIZE LOT COVERAGE Building Footprint Walkways, Patio &t Driveway TOTAL FLOOR AREA Main Floor Second Floor TOTAL SETBACKS Front Rear North Side (R) South Side Height Residence PROPOSED CODE REQUIREMENTS 12,974 sQ. Fr. 10,000 sQ. t~ r. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE 22%. 60% 1,919 sQ. FT. 905 sQ. FT. 2,824 sQ. FT. 7,257 sQ. FT MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE 1,919 sQ. FT. 1,485 sQ. FT. 3,404 sQ. Fr. 3,710 sQ. Fr. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT 25 r; r. 25 FT. 36 FT. 4 IN. 1ST FL- 25 FT 2ND FL. 35 FT. 1ST FL-38 FT. 1ST FL -10 FT. 2ND FL-40 FT. 2ND FL-15 FT. 1ST FL -10 FT. 1ST FL - 10 FT. 2ND FL -19 FT. 2ND FL -15 FT. 25 FT. 26 FT. 4 ®~O~O~ • • # 04-130 /Design Review -Lot 3 13089 Quito Road PROJECT DISCUSSION Design Review This Design Review application for Lot 3 involves review of a two story home with a design that is based somewhat on the Craftsman style which is typified in the Historic Mitchell house that is to be relocated from the center of the parcel onto Lot 5. The elevations depict a home with lap siding and lightweight concrete tiles that resemble slate shingles. In terms of the front facade, a low profile front entry with porch overhang is proposed. The entry door is bracketed by a double row of sidelights and single row of transom lights. The porch columns are detailed with rock wainscoting typical of the Craftsman style. An arched window at the stairway is proposed in the front facade. The design of the house has some of the detailing that is typically associated with Craftsman style dwellings but the character of the house would be enhanced with additional details that reflect this style. The use of exposed rafter beams at the eave is suggested to add additional texture and depth to the facade. The garage door should also reflect the Craftsman theme of the subdivision with multiple pane divided lights in the upper panel of the door. These details in the design of the house are recommended by staff in order to enhance the character of the development. The site plan proposes four drywells to minimize sto water runoff in response to the site design regulations mandated by the Santa C ra Watershed C-3 Permit issued by the .Regional Water Quality Control Board. Necessary Findings The Zoning Ordinance, Section 15-45.080 identifies the following findings as necessary for granting Design Review approval. (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. (b) Preserve natural landscape. (c) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. (d) Compatible bulk and height. (e) Employs current grading and erosion control methods. (f) Utilizes Residential Design Guide policies and techniques. Actual Findings The following findings have been made regarding the proposed new construction. (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The height, elevations and placement on the site of the proposed main or accessory structure, when considered with reference to: (i) the nature and location of residential structures on adjacent lots and within the neighborhoods; and (ii) community view sheds will avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. 0~4~'r~~ # 04-130 /Design Review -Lot 3 13089 Quito Road The proposed two-story dwelling will not interfere unreasonably with views and privacy. The home has a 38 foot first Iloor setback from the adjacent northern property line. This exceeds the minimum first Iloor side yard setback by 28 feet. The second Iloor setback of 40 feet exceeds the minimum setback by 25 feet. Furthermore, the northern facade has no windows on the second Iloor. This feature also minimizes the impact on privacy for the abutting property to the north of the lot. In addition, the home is located on Lot 3 in a way that minimizes the impact on the adjacent neighbor. A large open area is maintained between the two properties at the northern property line. If the home were single story, the impervious coverage would be greater and the home would encroach further into the side yard. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. The natural landscape will be preserved insofar as practicable by designing structures to follow the natural contours of the site and minimizing tree and soil removal; grade changes will be minimized and will be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed areas and undeveloped areas. The plan proposes to retain the existing topography and grading is minimal. Development on this lot would impact 3 trees, none of which are located on the lot. (c) Minimize perception of excessive bulb. The proposed main or accessory structure in relation to structures on adjacent lots and to the surrounding region will minimize the perception of excessive bulk and will be integrated into the environment. The design does not depict excessive bulk. Although a second story is proposed, the area of the second Iloor in relation to the first Iloor is proportional and the varying roofline serves to minimize the perception of bulk. The added design details recommended in the project discussion would also serve to vary the facade, add texture to the front facade and minimize the perception of bulk. (d) Compatible bulk and height. The proposed main or accessory structure will be compatible in terms of bulk and height with (I) existing residential structures on adjacent lots and those within the immediate neighborhood and within the same zoning district; and (ii) the natural environment; and shall not (iii) unreasonably impair the light and air of adjacent properties to utilize solar energy. The proposed two-story home is located in a neighborhood that is predominantly single story in character. However, the existing historic Mitchell house, which is the design inspiration for the proposed home, is a two-story structure and the Lot 3 design reIlects this style. The abutting neighbor to the north of Lot 3 has objected to the two-story structure. The applicant has tried to address their concerns with a design that maintains privacy and views. In addition, there is a two-story structure directly across McFarland Street. For these reasons, staff considers the design compatible in bulk and height to the existing neighborhood. ~~n~~~ # 04-130 /Design Review -Lot 3 13089 Quito Road (e) Current grading and erosion control methods. The proposed site development or grading plan incorporates currentgrading and erosion control standards used by the City. The proposed design retains the natural topography since changes to the grade surrounding the house are m;n;mal. Also the plan reflects the mandate by the Regional Quality Control Board to limit impervious coverage and storm water runoff. The proposed drywells are designed to slow runoff and retain the first flush of storm water. (~ Design policies and techniques. The proposed home will conform to each of the applicable design policies and techniques set forth in the Residential Design Handbook The above analysis supports the conclusion that the findings required for granting design review approval can be met provided the applicant carries out the conditions outlined in the resolution of approval. The City Arborist and the Santa Clara County Fire District have reviewed this application. Their comments are included as conditions of approval. • • ®~~~~7 # 04-130 /Design Review -Lot 3 13089 Quito Road Neighborhood Input Resolution #03-049, which granted tentative subdivision approval of this lot, required that the applicant hold a meeting with the surrounding neighbors to obtain a consensus on the design of the homes within the subdivision. Attachment # 5, which is included in this staff report, contains the notices that were signed by the surrounding neighbors. The map below depicts those parcels that approved the design of the proposed homes. Opposition to Two Story -Lot 3 As can be seen from the map below, the neighbor whose rear yard abuts Lot 3 did not sign the approval notice. Also the neighbor across Mc Farland Avenue did not sign the approval letter. These neighbors have in the subdivision process objected to the concept of two story homes within the new subdivision. The applicant has tried to address their concerns by locating the house far from their property line and eliminating windows on the second floor of the house. Staff recommends that the landscaping plan be revised to include additional landscaping and trees along the northern property line, which abuts Mc Farland Avenue. A privacy fence should also be constructed along the northern and western property line of Lot 3. C7 • ~~~~~~ # 04-130 /Design Review -Lot 3 13089 Quito Road Community Development The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A", New House- Lot 3, Salim Sagarchi, Dorcich Orchard, 13089 2uito Road, Saratoga prepared by Keith Royster, Architect, dated 2/10/03, date stamped 10/28/2004. The conditions of approval identified in this report shall be incorporated into the revised plans. 1. The landscape plan should be revised to provide a landscape buffer on Lot 3 between Lot 3 and the northern property line. 2. A six-foot high wooden privacy fence shall be constructed along the western and northern property line. The design shall be revised to enhance the architectural detailing in the facade and reflect Craftsman style architecture. Exposed rafter beams at the eaves are required to meet the design review guidelines. The garage door should continue the Craftsman theme of the subdivision with multiple pane divided lights in the upper panel of the door. These details in the design of the house are required in order to enhance the character of the development. 4. Four sets of complete construction plans incorporating required revisions and this Resolution on a separate plan page shall be submitted to the Building Division. S. The landscape plan shall be installed prior to granting f' al planning approval of the project. 6. Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. 7. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscaped area. 8. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. 9. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. 10. Proper maintenance of landscaping, with minimal pesticide use, shall be the responsibility of the property owner. 11. The site plan shall be stamped and signed by a Licensed Land Surveyor who verifies the accuracy of the boundaries. ~~~~~~ # 04-130 /Design Review -Lot 3 13089 Quito Road , 12. Prior to pouring of foundation, the setbacks identified in the approved plans shall be verified by a licensed land surveyor. This verification shall be documented by a signed and sealed statement from the Surveyor. This statement shall be submitted to the building inspector prior to pouring foundation. 13. The plan data on sheet SP-1 shall be revised to correct the impervious coverage ratio. The impervious coverage is 22% as per the submitted data. Fire Protection District The Santa Clara County Fire District reviewed this application on May 25, 2004 and their requirements are included as conditions of approval: 1. Required Fire flow: the fire flow for this project is 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. The required fire flow is available from area water mains and fire hydrants(s), which are spaced at the required spacing. 2. Public Fire Hydrant Required: Provide 1 public fire hydrant at locations to be determined by the fire department and the San Jose Water Company. Hydrants shall have a minimum single flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual with spacing not to exceed 500 feet. 3. Timing of required water supply installations: Installations of required fire service and fire hydrants shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance maybe withheld until required installations are completed, tested and accepted. 4. Garage Fire Sprinkler Required: An approved automatic fire sprinkler system designed per National Fire Protection Association Standard #13D and local ordinances, shall be provided for the garage. To ensure proper sprinkler operation, the garage shall have a smooth, flat, horizontal ceiling. A state of California licensed fire protection contractor shall submit three sets of plans, calculations, a complete permit application and appropriate fees to this department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. 5. Fire Apparatus Access Roads Required: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15%. Installations shall conform to Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications. to ©~QQ~~® # 04-130 /Design Review -Lot 3 13089 Quito Road CityArborist Report The City Arborist reviewed this project and prepared a report dated May 28, 2004. The recommendations of this report are included as conditions of approval. The proposed project on this lot would impact three trees of Ordinance size (#36-38). They include one Modesto Ash (#36) and two Coast Redwoods (#37 and 38). Per City Ordinance, a bond equal to 100% of the appraised value of these trees, which is $5,113, is required to promote their protection. The September 11, 2002 arborist report identifies 36 fruit trees of Ordinance size scattered throughout the property. Many are dead while the others appear in overall poor condition. For this reason, their removal is appropriate and mitigation is not suggested. The below recommendations are intended to be used in conjunction with those presented in the September 11, 2002 report. 1. Tree protective fencing shall be installed precisely as shown on the attached map and established prior to any demolition, grading, surface scraping, construction or heavy equipment arriving on site. It shall be comprised of five- to six-foot high chain link mounted on two-inch diameter, galvanized steel posts, driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 12 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the cons ction process until final • inspection. 2. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities mus be conducted outside the fenced areas (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: grading, surface scraping, trenching, storage and dumping of materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 3. Protective fencing must remain installed throughout the landscape installation phase. Small openings can be created at that time (i.e. only immediately before landscape construction begins) to only allow for foot traffic and wheelbarrow access. 4. The surveyed locations of each tree trunk must be shown on all future site, grading and drainage, and landscape plans submitted to the City. S. Upon being available, plans showing grading and drainage, irrigation, and underground utilities shall be reviewed by the City for tree impacts. 6. All underground utilities (i.e. water, gas, sewer, electrical) and drainage features (such as drain lines, swales and dissipaters) should be designed outside from beneath canopies of retained trees; The arborist should be consulted if this is not feasible. 7. Supplemental water shall be supplied every two weeks to each retained tree during the months of April thru November. This should begin at the start of grading and continue 11 ~~Q~~~ # 04-130 /Design Review -Lot 3 13089 Quito Road through construction. A rate of 10 gallons per inch of trunk diameter shall be applied using soaker hoses placed on the soil surface beneath the mid- to outer-canopies. 8. All underground pipes and irrigation lines planned for removal beneath the canopies of retained trees should remain buried and cut off at existing soil grade. 9. Irrigation trenches should be designed no closer than 10 times the trunk diameter of trees being retained. Where this is not feasible, the imgation system must be a drip- type system placed on top of existing soil grade. 10. Irrigation spray should reach no closer than three feet from a tree's trunk (including those of newly installed trees). All forms of imgation for new trees must be of adrip- type system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. 11. Lawn or other plant material requiring frequent watering must comprise no more than 20-percent of the area beneath a tree's canopy. All other plant material should be drought tolerant. 12. Mulch, stones or other landscape features must be placed no closer than one-foot from the trees' trunks. Bender board should not be installed and tilling of the soil should not occur within 10 times the diameter of the nearest trunk. 13. Herbicides should not be used beneath tree canopies. Where used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. S 14. The pruning of trees must be performed under the supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. Information regarding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained by referring to the following website: http://www.isa-arborcom/arborists/arbsearchhtml. Concltasion The proposed residence is designed to conform to the policies set forth in the City's Residential Design Handbook and to satisfy all of the findings required within Section 15- 45.080 of the Ciry Code if developed with the recommended conditions. The residence will not interfere with views or privacy, preserves the natural landscape and will minimize the perception of bulk. The proposal if developed with conditions and revisions, will satisfy all other zoning regulations in terms of allowable floor area, setbacks, maximum height and impervious coverage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Design Review application with conditions by adopting the Resolution for Application 04-130. • • Attachment 1 • -~~:~~~3 # 04-130 /Design Review -Lot 3 13089 Quito Road RESOLUTION N0.04- APPLICATION N0.04-130 CITY OF SAR.ATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sagarchi/ 13089 Quito Road -Lot 3 WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review approval to construct a 3,404 square foot two story home on Lot 3, a 12,974 square foot lot at the end of the cul-de-sac in the recently approved Dorcich Orchard subdivision. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS the project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-family residences. The site is in an urbanized area and is connected to utility and roadway infrastructure and involves the construction of one single family home; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Design Review approval, and the following findings have been determined: Policy 1, M~n~m»e the perception of bulk The design uses architectural features to break up massing. The house is two story with a cross gabled roof which reduces the mass of the roofline. The covered, porch with simple front door with sidelights and transom is low profile in design and proportion. Policy 2, Integrate structures with the environment The design preserves the natural landscape, since the plan proposes to retain the existing topography and minimal grading is proposed. In order to further integrate the structure into the environment a landscape buffer and screen plantings are required along the northern property line. Policy 3, Avoid interference with privacy The proposed two-story dwelling will not interfere unreasonably with views and privacy. The home exceeds the minunum first floor side yard setback by 28 feet. Furthermore, the # 04-130 /Design Review -Lot 3 13089 Quito Road northern facade has no windows on the second floor. This feature also minimizes the impact on privacy for the abutting property to the north of the lot. Policy 4, Preserve views and access to views Locating the home on Lot 3 is done in such a way as to retain much of the view to the rear of the adjacent lot abutting Mc Farland Avenue. Since only 11% of the lot has a second story elevation and this elevation is removed from the abutting neighbor, the home appears designed in a way that preserves views. Policy 5, Design for maximum benefit of sun and wind The location of the house does not block the sun of any neighbors since additional setback is provided. The mature trees to be retained provide shade and wind block therefore the design maximi es existing landscaping and does not interfere with the solar access of neighbors. Now, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the application by for Design Review approval is hereby granted subject to th following conditions: DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A", New House- Lot 3, Salim Sagarchi, Dorcich Orchard, 13089 2uito Road, Saratoga prepared by Keith Royster, Architect, dated 2/10/03, date stamped 10/28/2004. The conditions of approval identified in this report shall be incorporated into the revised plans. 1. The landscape plan should be revised to provide a landscape buffer on Lot 3 between Lot 3 and the northern property line. A six-foot high wooden privacy fence shall be constructed along the western and northern property line. 3. The design shall be revised to enhance the architectural detailing in the facade and reflect Craftsman style architecture. Exposed rafter beams at the eaves are required to meet the design review guidelines. The garage door should continue the Craftsman theme of the subdivision with multiple pane divided lights in the upper panel of the door. These details in the design of the house are required in order to enhance the character of the development. 4. Four sets of complete construction plans incorporating required revisions and this Resolution on a separate plan page shall be submitted to the Building Division. Qr'•~f~~ # 04-130 /Design Review - L.ot 3 13089 Quito Road 5. The landscape plan shall be installed prior to granting final planning approval of the project. 6. Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. 7. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hadscaped area. 8. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. 9. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. 10. Proper maintenance of landscaping, with minimal pesticide use, shall be the responsibility of the property owner. 11. The site plan shall be stamped and signed by a Licensed Land Surveyor who verifies the accuracy of the boundaries. 12. Prior to pouring of foundation, the setbacks identified in the approved plans shall be verified by a licensed land surveyor. This verification shall be documented by a signed and sealed statement from the Surveyor. This statement shall be submitted to the building inspector prior to pouring foundation. 13. The plan data on sheet SP-1 shall be revised to correct the impervious coverage ratio. The impervious coverage is 22% as per the submitted data. Fire Protection District The Santa Clara County Fire District reviewed this application on May 25, 2004 and their requirements are included as conditions of approval: 1. Required Fire flow: the fire flow for this project is 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. The required fire flow is available from area water mains and fire hydrants(s), which are spaced at the required spacing. 2. Public Fire Hydrant Required: Provide 1 public fire hydrant at locations to be determined by the fire department and the San Jose Water Company. Hydrants shall have a minimum single flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual with spacing not to exceed 500 feet. ~kn6~6~`~.~ # 04-130 /Design Review -Lot 3 13089 Quito Road 3. Timing of required water supply installations: Installations of required fire service and fire hydrants shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested and accepted. 4. Garage Fire Sprinkler Required: An approved automatic fire sprinkler system designed per National Fire Protection Association Standard #13D and local ordinances, shall be provided for the garage. To ensure proper sprinkler operation, the garage shall have a smooth, flat, horizontal ceiling. S. Fire Apparatus Access Roads Required: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15%. Installations shall conform to Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications. City Arborist Report The City Arborist reviewed this project and prepared a report dated May 28, 2004. The recommendations of this report are included as conditions of approval. The proposed project on this lot would impact three trees f Ordinance size (#36-38). They include one Modesto Ash (#36) and two Coast Redw ods (#37 and 38). Per City Ordinance, a bond equal to 100% of the appraised value of se trees, which is $5,113, is required to promote their protection. The September 11, 2002 arborist report identifies 36 fruit trees of Ordinance size scattered throughout the property. Many are dead while the others appear in overall poor condition. For this reason, their removal is appropriate and mitigation is not suggested. The below recommendations are intended to be used in conjunction with those presented in the September 11, 2002 report. 1. Tree protective fencing shall be installed precisely as shown on the attached map and established prior to any demolition, grading, surface scraping, construction or heavy equipment amving on site. It shall be comprised of five- to six-foot high chain link mounted on two-inch diameter, galvanized steel posts, driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 12 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. 2. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the fenced areas (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: grading, surface scraping, trenching, storage and dumping of materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. c.~~~~i~ i_ i # 04-130 /Design Review -Lot 3 13089 Quito Road Protective fencing must remain installed throughout the landscape installation phase. Small openings can be created at that time (i.e. only immediately before landscape construction begins) to only allow for foot traffic and wheelbarrow access. 4. The surveyed locations of each tree trunk must be shown on all future site, grading and drainage, and landscape plans submitted to the City. 5. Upon being available, plans showing grading and drainage, irrigation, and underground utilities shall be reviewed by the City for tree impacts. 6. All underground utilities (i.e. water, gas, sewer, electrical) and drainage features (such as drain lines, swales and dissipaters) should be designed outside from beneath canopies of retained trees; The arborist should be consulted if this is not feasible. 7. Supplemental water shall be supplied every two weeks to each retained tree during the months of April thru November. This should begin at the start of grading and continue through construction. A rate of 10 gallons per inch of trunk diameter shall be applied using soaker hoses placed on the soil surface beneath the mid- to outer- canopies. 8. All underground pipes and irrigation lines planned for removal beneath the canopies of retained trees should remain buried and cut off at existing soil grade. 9. Irrigation trenches should be designed no closer than 10 times the trunk diameter of trees being retained. Where this is not feasible, the imgation system must be a drip-type system placed on top of existing soil grade. 10. Irrigation spray should reach no closer than three feet from a tree's trunk (including those of newly installed trees). All forms of irrigation for new trees must be of a drip-type system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. 11. Lawn or other plant material requiring frequent watering must comprise no more than 20-percent of the area beneath a tree's canopy. All other plant material should be drought tolerant. 12. Mulch, stones or other landscape features must be placed no closer than one-foot from the trees' trunks. Bender board should not be installed and tilling of the soil should not occur within 10 times the diameter of the nearest trunk. 13. Herbicides should not be used beneath tree canopies. Where used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. 14. The pruning of trees must be performed under the supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. ~~~~~"~ ~ # 04-130 /Design Review -Lot 3 13089 Quito Road Information regarding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained by referring to the following website: http://www.isa-arbor.com/arborists/arbsearchhtml. Cin ArrORNEY 1. Applicant agrees to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. 2. Noncompliance with any of the conditions of this permit shall constitute a violation of the permit. Because it is impossible to estimate damages the City could incur due to the violation, liquidated damages of $250 shall be payable to this City per each day of the violation. Section 2. Construction must be commenced within 36 months or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15-90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effectiv fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. ~k ~~~~- # 04-130 /Design Review -Lot 3 13089 Quito Road PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 10th day of November 2004 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date • ~~~~~~~ .7 Attachment 2 • 1 -s-~r, I ~ I !' ~ i i ~~ .r... ~~ 1 `: / ~ r~ , ~ti ti~! i ~. ~' i j .. ~ , }! _ i KI 4 f- ~ ~ _ .~-~ ~ s ~1 ~ ~ t }xt ~ 4 1 i., i ~ ~ v Y I f Ai x„~ ; ~ 1 e i ~ ~'r r 'I ~t ~I ~II I ~i . ~.. . <~ I ~i ~ r ~ +' f L t ~ ~ i + ;.i .5 r~ ~ ::; ,~ .......~ ...- . •.r I t ~ ~y ~: ~ , '' ~' ~ - f 4 ~ i S~ 1. L ,L __~ S ~. ~ ~ f ~~~~~~ .~ti. ? e ,, KEY PLAN • • • ~~l~~titi • Attachment 3 • ~l~~~fi~G~i ~~= ARB~ RESOURCES ~ _ Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care • A TREE INVENTORY AND REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED NEW RESIDENCE AT 13089 QUITO ROAD -LOT 3 SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA OWNER'S NAME: SAGARCHI APPLICATION #: 04-130 APN #: 389-014-037 Submitted to: I Community Development Department City of Saratoga 'I 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 Prepared by: David L. Babby, RCA Registered Consulting Arborist #399 Certified Arborist #WE-4001A May 28, 2004 • • P.O. Box 25295, San Mateo. California 94402 • Email: arborresources@earthlink.net Phone: 650.654.335] • Fax: 650.654.3352 • Licensed Contractor #796763 David L. Babby, Registered Colting Arborist • May 28, 2004 • SUMMARY The proposed project on this lot would impact three trees of Ordinance size (#36-38). They include one Modesto Ash (#36) and two Coast Redwoods (#37 and 38). None of these trees are shown on plans reviewed. Each tree is planned for retention. Measures presented in the `Recommendations' section of this report must be carefully followed and incorporated into construction plans. Per City Ordinance, a bond equal to 100% of the appraised value' of these trees, which is $5,113, is required to promote their protection. INTRODUCTION The City of Saratoga Community Development Department has requested I review the potential tree impacts associated with constructing asingle-family residence on a vacant lot at 13089 Quito Road -Lot 3, Saratoga. This report presents my findings and recommendations. Information regarding each tree is presented within the attach table attached to the City Arborist report dated September 11, 2002. Plans reviewed for this report include Sheets T-1, SP-0, SP-3 and A-3.4 (by Keith Royster Architects, dated 2/10/03) and Sheet L-4 (by Creative Horticulture, dated 04/04). The trees' locations, numbers and canopy perimeters are presented on an attached copy of Sheet SP-3 (Site Plan). The trees are not shown on plans reviewed. Their trunk locations have been added to the attached map and should not be construed as being surveyed. The three trees aze situated on neighboring properties and were inventoried for this report as their root zones aze vulnerable to construction damage. The September 11, 2002 azborist report identifies 36 fruit trees of Ordinance size scattered throughout the property. Many aze dead while the others appear in overall poor condition. For this reason, their removal is appropriate and mitigation is not suggested. Please note I am unable to fully determine how many of these trees would be removed from this lot due to their high number as well as the lot boundaries not being seen. 'The appraised tree values shown on the attached Tree Inventory Table are calculated in accordance with the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9'h Edition, published by the International Society of Arboriculture, 2000. Sagarchi Property, 13089 Quito Road -Lot 3, Saratoga Page 1 of 3 City of Saratoga Community Development Department '^ ^''"' C,~ ~fj~,~.•~ • • David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist May 28, 2004 RECOMMENDATIONS The below recommendations aze intended to be used in conjunction with those presented in the September 11, 2002 report. 1. Tree protective fencing shall be installed precisely as shown on the attached map and established prior to any demolition, grading, surface scraping, construction or heavy equipment arriving on site. It shall be comprised of five- to six-foot high chain link mounted on two-inch diameter, galvanized steel posts, driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 12 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. 2. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the fenced areas (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: grading, surface scraping, trenching, storage and dumping of materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and pazking. 3. I recommend protective fencing remain installed throughout the landscape installation phase. Small openings can be created at that time (i.e. only immediately before landscape construction begins) to only allow for foot traffic and wheelbarrow access. U 4. The surveyed locations of each tree trunk must be shown on all future site, grading and drainage, and landscape plans submitted to the City. 5. Upon being available, plans showing grading and drainage, irrigation, and underground utilities shall be reviewed by the City for tree impacts. 6. All underground utilities (i.e. water, gas, sewer, electrical) and drainage features (such as drain lines, swales and dissipaters) should be designed outside from beneath canopies of retained trees; I should be consulted if this is not feasible. 7. Supplemental water shall be supplied every two weeks to each retained tree during the months of April thru November. This should begin at the start of grading and continue through construction. I recommend a rate of 10 gallons per inch of trunk diameter applied using soaker hoses placed on the soil surface beneath the mid- to outer- canopies. 8. All underground pipes and irrigation lines planned for removal beneath the canopies of retained trees should remain buried and cut off at existing soil grade. 9. Imgation trenches should be designed no closer than 10 times the trunk diameter of trees being retained. Where this is not feasible, the imgation system must be a drip- type system placed on top of existing soil grade. Sagarchi Property, 13089 Quito Road -Lot 3, Saratoga Page 2 of 3 City of Saratoga Community Development Department 4s~'~,~~ ~~ David L. Babby, Registered Colting Arborist • May 28, 2004 10. Imgation spray should reach no closer than three feet from a tree's trunk (including those of newly installed trees). All forms of irrigation for new trees must be of adrip- type system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. 11. Lawn or other plant material requiring frequent watering must comprise no more than 20-percent of the azea beneath a tree's canopy. All other plant material should be drought tolerant. 12. Mulch, stones or other landscape features must be placed no closer than one-foot from the trees' trunks. Bender boazd should not be installed and tilling of the soil should ,not occur within 10 times the diameter of the neazest trunk. 13. Herbicides should not be used beneath tree canopies. Where used on site, they should be labeled for safe use neaz trees. 14. The pruning of trees must be performed under the supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and according to ISA standazds. Information regazding Certified Arborists in the azea can be obtained by refemng to the following website: http://www. isa-arbor. com/arborists/arbsearch. html. Attachment: Site Map (Copy of Sheet SP-3) • • Sagarchi Property, 13089 Quito Road -Lot 3, Saratoga Page 3 of 3 City of Saratoga Community Development Department " r''~ \~~~~a;. ------~ ,1 1 •I / 1 II 13089 Quito Road -Lot 7, SanwBa ~ 1 1 ' 1 1 Ci otS Commtati Deve t tlepanment 1 1 ` $l~d.(4f H aratWV N IOPaKO ~ I / 1 1 I j 1 I bgp: Map identifies duce uses of Ordinance ais. I 1 1 Canopy Fin are appmaiarrc. I 1 , Map hu been adrrced in sia and is as a scale. ~ _ _ N I % 1 1 I --~~~~~ 1 36 II ~: M.y7a,7oa X88°oq'~o"w k 1 ~1. 1 ~ 11 ~ i~ ~ '1, b i~ / 1, • ,, v ~, ~~~ ~---~'-~r------- ------------ ~~ i .~( ' ° I ~ 41'-II' ,, ~ // 1 ~ : ~'~ ~ PROTECTIVE FENCING ; i~ a ,~ F F ~ ~` ~ ~ - ` Prepared By: ' I I \\` 58"1°22'34"E ARBOR RESOURCES ,~`\' 1 1 - - , iy ~ - ~ - ~ - , - , - , - , - , - , Pro/rarlosa/ Arbonedr.rsl Crn.alrlej 6 Trre f n.r ~\ ~ ~ r \ 1 . ~ 1 ~ c15.b3' r.o. a~:sps . s.a w.a. c~ . woo: I 's i W ` n~e:usolss~alsl ~.IC.non,a~;a.nat~*..n I i - `~ ~' 1 i i t ~ _ -~--~- ~ I `. r ' . 7 • I • ~~i~~~~~ • Attachment 4 • \r~~~ ~~PC~ °~o • .~ m ~,~ ~......~ ~. SIRE DEPARTMENT SANTA CLARA COUNTY • 04 1082 PLAN REVIEW NUMBER BLDG PERMR NUMBER 14700 Winchester Blvd., Los Gatos, CA 95032-1818 (408) 378-4010 • (408) 378-9342 (fax) • www.sccfd.org coNrRDLNUMBER FlLE NUMBER 04-130 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS CODE/SEC. SHEET SP-0 NO.I REQUIREMENT Review of a proposed 3,402 square foot single family residence with an attached garage. This review covers Lot #3. Review of this Developmental proposal is limited to acceptability of site access and water supply as they pertain to fire department operations, and shall not be construed as a substitute for formal plan review to determine compliance with adopted model codes. Prior to performing any work the applicant shall make application to, and receive from, the Building Department all applicable construction permits. It is noted that the Site Plan does not appear to match the scale shown. • ~p II-A~dix It is noted that the proposed new street will be identified as Dorcich Court. Please reflect that street name on all future applications. Required Fire Flow: The fire flow for this project is 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. The required fire flow is available from area water mains and fire hydrant(s) which are spaced at the required spacing. STG ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ I I I KEITH ROYSTER ARCHITECTS 15/25/2004 I 1 QF 3 LOT 3 I I I Residential Construction I Hokanson, Wayne SFR- SARGACHI ~ 13089 Quito Rd Organized as the Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District ~„~~~~® Serving Santa Clara County and the communities of Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, and Saratoga ~~~c~ °°o '~ A ~_~ ~ a~ COURl~P ~ MIIYIC[ ~IR1 • EPARTMENT SANTA CLARA COUNTY 14700 Winchester Blvd., Los Gatos, CA 95032-1818 (408) 378-4010 • (408) 378-9342 (fax) • www.sccfd.org • 04 1082 PLAN REVIEW NUMBER BLDG PERMR NUMBER CONiROLNUMBER FILE NUMBER 04-130 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS CODEIBEC. vFc 903.2 uI~ 901.3 SMC 16-15.070 t1Fc X02.2.2 SNEET NO. ~ REOUIREMEPR Public Fire Hydrant(s) Required: Provide 1 ublic fire hydrant(s) at location(s) to be determined by the Fire Department and the San Jose Water Company. Hydrant(s) shall have a minimum single flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual, with spacing not to exceed 500 feet. Prior to applying for building permit, provide civil drawings reflecting all fire hydrants serving the site. To prevent building permit delays, the developer shall pay all required fees to the water company ASAP. 'Timing.of Required Water Suvvly Installations: Installations of required fire service(s) and fire hydrant(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department, prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance maybe withheld until required installations are completed, tested, and accepted. 7 Garage Fire Sprinkler Svste~ m Required: An approved, automatic fire sprinkler system designed per National Fire Protection Association Standard #13D and local ordinances, shall be provided for the garage. Toe ure proper sprinkler operation, the garage shall have a smooth, flat, ho ' ontal ceiling. A State of California licensed fire protection contractor shall s bmit three (3) sets of plans, calculations, a completed permit application and a ropriate fees to this department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. Fire Avvaratus (Engine) Access Roads Required: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface, a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15%. Installations shall conform with Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications sheet A-1. CMy PLANS SPECS NEW RMDL AS OCCUPANCY CONST.TYPE AppllcaMWm• DATE PAGE 3TG ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ KEITH ROYSTER ARCHITECTS 5/25/2004 2 3 OF iECJFLOOR AREA LOAD DESCRIPTION BY Residential Construction Hokanson, Wayne 17~6F PROJECT LOCATION SFR- SARGACHI 13089 Quito Rd Organized as the Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District ..,,,,~ Serving Santo Clara County and the communities of Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos, ' jk i ~j' Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos. Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, and Saratoga • c~ oo FIRE~EPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW NUMBER 04 1082 ~~ G~~ SANTA CLARA COUNTY BLDGPERMRNUMBER ~•~~ co I ~ '• 14700 Winchester Blvd., Los Gatos, CA 95032-1818 (408) 378-4010 • (408) 378-9342 (fax) • www.sccfd.org CONTROLNUMIBER cou~re•v ~ ~uvcc q FILE NUMBER 04-~ 30 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS CODE/SEC. SHEET NO. REQUIREMENT AFC 9 Fire Department (Engine) Roadway Turn-around Required: Provide an X02.2.2.4 approved fire department engine roadway turnaround with a minimum radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside. Installations shall conform with Fire Department Standard Details and Specification sheet A-1. Cul-De-Sac Diameters shall be no less than 72 feet. Note the fire lane marking requirement in item #11 below specific to the cul de sac bulb. ~0~2.2.4.1 to Parking Alon¢ R~ oadway~: The required width of fire access roadways shall not be obstructed in any manner and, parking shall not be allowed along roadways less. than 28 feet in width. Parking may be permitted along one side of roadways 28-35 feet in width. For roadways equal to or greater than 36 feet, parking will be allowed on both sides of the roadway. Roadway widths shall be measured curb face to curb face, with parking space based on an 8 ft width. Io 2 11 Fire Lane Marking Required: Provide marking for all roadways within the project. Markings shall be per fire department specifications. Installations shall also conform to Local Government Standards and Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications A-6. i 1013 12 Timing.of Required Roadway Installations: Required access roads, up through first lift of asphalt, shall be installed and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of construction. Bulk combustible materials shall not be delivered to the site until installation is complete. During construction, emergency access roads shall be maintained clear and unimpeded. Note that building permit issuance may be withheld until installations are completed. ~o :4 13 Premises Identification: Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall contrast with their background. Clty PLANS SPECS NEW RMDL AS OCCUPANCY CONST. TYPE App1luMWm• DATE PAGE 3TG ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ KEITH ROYSTER ARCHITECTS 5/25/2004 3 3 OF iECJFLOOR AREA LOAD DESCRIPTION BY .OT 3 Residential Construction Hokanson, Wayne NAME OF PROJECT SFR- SARGACHI LocnnoN 13089 Quito Rd Organized as the Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District Serving Santa Clara County and the communities of Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos, ~~~'~ti Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, and Saratoga Attachm~,nt 5 • ~~~~v~ AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF SANTA CIARA ) ~ ~ bein dul sworn, de oses and says: that I am a I, ~ ~- ~ g Y P citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Sazatoga Planning Commission on the ~ day of ~~~~ 2004, that. I deposited in the United States Post Office within Santa Clara County, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to-wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said ersons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing P pursuant to Section 15-45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the Ciry of Sazatoga in that said persons and their addresses aze those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property to be affected by the application; that on said day there was regulaz communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. Signed • • NOTICE OF REARING BEFORE PIANNING COMMISSION CITY OF SARATOGA'S PLANNING COMMISSION announces the' following public hearing on Wednesday, the 10th day of November at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, which are located in the Civic Theater at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Project details and, plans are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Thursday, 7:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. If you have questions, on the project please direct them to Ann Welsh, Associate Planner, awelsh@saratoga.ca.us or 408-868-1230. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and ce If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a public hearing in court, you be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) descri in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Saratoga Planning Commission at, or pri r to, the public hearing. In order to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed on or before the Tuesday, a week before the meeting. APPLICATIONS #04-128,129,130,131 & 132 (389-14-37) SAGARCHI,13089 Quito Road - The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct five single family homes on the site of the former Dorcich Orchard which was approved for a six lot subdivision on 11/1.2/03. The proposed homes are designed to be compatible with the style of the historic farmhouse, which is being moved and restored on Lot 5. The homes are two story structures with a maximum height of 25 feet 6 inches. The floor area of the homes range in size from 3,366 square feet to 3,517 square feet. The property is in the R-1, 10,000 zoning district. The landscaping and Quito Road sound wall are also the subject of review. -~ ~ r- ~l it~ ~'i.~.y In 0 M a~ a M t0 1~ O O O r N M et ~ (O h O O O N O~ 00 O O r N M~ O t0 ~ O CD 1~ O t71 O r MMMM~~~~~~~et~ertn0000 rr~r~rrNNNNNNMM 0000000000 000ooooogooooo0000000000 ~ r r r ~ r r r r r r r r r r r r r ~- r r r r r r r r ~- r r r r r r r O~OOCJ)000000) 0000001000100G~OOfQ~Q~Q~O p0p00~~0p~000~ M c~ M cO~ M M M M M M M M M M M c~ c00 M c00 M tor! M M c' ~ M M M M M e ~ M M M M M C~ Q~ CA t71 0~ C~ r r r r r r r r r r r r~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ R ~ ~ ~ ti ~ a °r ~ ~ °n ~ °r ~ ~i i ~ °n N to O CA 0 0 O~ CA tD O r h tf) O ~O r ~- t0 r r~ 0 0 0~ 0 0 M 0 0 0 O~cOt00cOtDrtOtO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0000 ~QOO O O N tp M tp 0 1f~ 1n c'~ M M M NN N N N N NN N ~t 01 tOGDtDNONNNNNNNNNN ~cCCDCOCCI~cctOt0tDt0c0cat0c00 O O ~ O ~ ~ ~ 1Qp~ ipo~ I~ fppm fQ~ Ip~ N iQ~ 1pp~ 1Qp~ 1Qp~ fppm fQp~ ti 1Qp~ fQO~ fQ~ 1A ltd l~ IA ~ ~ ~ 1n to LA 1~ 1t~ Its ~ 1~ 1f~ 1A vs Q, o~~Q,~c~c~v~wwrno~v~a~rnrn _d .~aQaaaaQaaaaaQaaapaaaaaaaaaaQaaaaaaa N U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U aaaaaaaoaaaaa~aa~aa aaaaacnaaaaaaaaaa c~c~c~c~c~c~c~?c~c~c~c~c~oc~c~QC~c~ ooo~~o~oooooo~ooo 0000000~--0OOOOQOOLLO000000 -~F-F-1--I-HF-HH~,,.~ F-HF-I-F-F-H~f-f-l-HF- F-HXHHZh-F-F-F- ~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~=~~W~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~'aaaaaaa~aaaaaoaa~aa~aaaaaoaaaaaa as U (~ ~ !~ U N N N U fn fA N (~ N J fA U ~ ~ ~ LL ~ M U ~ ~ J fn U fA ~ ~ N U N fn f~ 0 a a a a a~ a a a Q a a a Q a a w p p p p p p p p p 0 p p p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ p Z Z Z Z O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z p p p p p p a>>>>> Z>> >> > Z gggg~g~~aaaaaJaa aagaggg5agggg~gg g zzzzzz}zz~,zzoz~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W w w W w W~ w O O O O O j O O~ O O W O LL LL LL LL c ~n LL ua. . u~. 4+ - LL LL~ LL LL w cnv~cnv~v~v~-w» > m»v> > aaaaQQSmww~i.iw~iixwwa,w~i~w000UQUUUUUUUUUU v,CLn.dan.G.dC9pppppoppNppWp~~g~v~~~~~~~~~~ O ~ r LCD M tt) r t0 O O N O O y N t0 O~ O N~ M M to ~ r~ O O ~ O r pOj V, OD O r 1t) O~ t0 N r L r O 00 CO ~j M O O M (D 00 O~ N~ x ~ N t~pA '~C000~00000000000MOo00~aDa00~O a00a00Oa00CODC~0000COOCODO~0000G000~0~~COOOGODCOO~aOaD Q r r r r r r r N r r r r r 1t) r r m r r r r r r r r r r r ~- r r r r r r r m _w Z W Y~~ J -~a~ J w W m '~ cn a aW J QUH ~WU oiS W H } W as }~~ Za~Y Hp~~ WQW Wm?O' W~ a~ w ~ ~Q°~QW ~can0 ~zmv}iJv~ia~am~~ ~a ~aetS = (~ JZ~j J°~QwW ~WQa~~~~Q~W~oiS~J~WwO ~~F-~~YV a~`~~W ~~Z~-~sYZm~~U=~J~Q~~j~Z~~IA ~ W LLI Q U Q~ ~ W p~ V a~ Q m W U~~ W W a~~ Z 2 Q O~ Q p S m s Qsmaz QOOz-mom ~s0 ~ zzOp U,~w v> >OV -,HO W~=YZZ> W-JO ~~=QY=~ f=2SQZU'J2ln~O~w ws}pa awQ~-~Jp~ wQ zH F-Q p wwaZ~ ~~W~ JW~~mUfl~saZaw2 WLL Wp=Y~pWF-wO~~ZSWO ~QaZw~(j=pJZZZ(~~O~J(nJp>'ZUU-O ~ZZJ JZ Vr JU ~wW~O~000OsQ>~~~QwwO~C7~}~QOzmwa OOawp ZYpU~m(~SpU' UW WOC~WJU.C~~}ZmJmp~iwW-~~~smF-~p ,-- • N M ~ LA tO f~ 00 Q~ O ~- N M ~ N M ~ ~ ~ ~ pp O O r' N M ss~~ O ~D I~ 00 0~ 0 •- ~ N M MM MMMMM~ef ~~~tAOtA 1f)~A~tD~CtO~GCQ~C~Q~C~Df~t~pp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E O v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C O O O O G v O G v 0 0 0 0 0 0 '~ ~ ~! ~ ~ ~ st ~ ~ ~ ~ of ~ ~ e! tt ~ st ~ st ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~t ~ ~ ~t ~ st ~ ~ CO c0 r r' 1" r r r r r !" r r r r r T r r f~ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r f r r r r M M M co M M M M ~"~ M M <''~ M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M t0 O . ~ N r ~I~f~cCCO~~ f~~A~~'~l~OM~~AOtAQ~O~flf~l~t~QNCOCD00~00CD~00~0~ N 1A N N O .- 1A r ~ ~ .- ~ ~ .- 01 ~ ~ ~ 1n ~ ~ N tf) N N r ~ ~ 1C~ r ~- .- ~ ~ tD cC ~ I~ f~ t0 O M t0 cD c0 ~D t0 t0 t0 tG tD h c0 t0 1~ 01 Imo. ~ tp t0 tC N t0 t0 N tp f0 t0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ Y ~ ~ Y Y ~ M Q M ~ Q M O 00~000~00 000'~t00~~~000~~1~~~~~~ IQp~ 1pp~ 1pp~ IQp~ 1Qp~ 1pp~ fQ~ I~ 1Qp~ Qph fQp~ IQp~ fQp~ f~ t~ f~ ~Qp fQp~ 1Qp~ 1Q~ pNp I~ 1Qp~ fQ~ fpm 1Q~ 1Q~ 1n 1Q~ 10~ QM 1Q~ fQ~ 1p~ In It7 lA In It7 1[~ ~ 1~ t~ 1f~ LA IA 1A 1A 10A l~ LOC) LA lf~ lA ~ t~ ~ lA ~f7 tt7 1A to ~ t[~ IA 1~ 1C~ 1A 1!~ O~OOp)G~ 00010Q~001010 00)O~O)0~0~00)O)O)O)010~G10~C~ W O~ W0~ W aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUvUUU w z aaQQa'Jaa~Qaaaaa aQQoaaQ QaQaQQ aaWaaa ~OOOO~OOVOOOOOOm0001-000}0 OOOOWOOWO00 QHQFQQ-QQHFQQ-QHQ FQQ-FQQ-QQHQFaa-FQQ-FQQ-QHQFQQ-OFQQ-F-QHQ~QHQFQQ-FQQ- fQQ- QHQFQQ-fQQ-FQQ- FQQ-QHQ FQQ-FQQ-FQQ- QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ~Q=QQQ~Q QQQQ~QQ~QQQ UfnNfnf~~NN~ V~f~fnNNNNNfnfnUfnf~fnC7~ (q(~(~(~~lgfA~f~fA~ F- > U a W O ° a~QaaaaaaQaaaoaa°aoaoaaa aaQaaa »°°~ 3 iz~~ iwc~=iii==o===wii~°~}a}}} }}_}}} ~ ° o~oooooo~ooUOOo LLOOF"f"JmZ JQ'm~ma'n'Q~~a'U~m~a~U~000NUU~UUU Q 0 d O w ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ Q' ~ ~ d O a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ m ~~1pAp ~~D O M M ~j,J Cep 00 u' O~ tt~ ~ f~ c0 O ~ 00 _N tD G~ cG N 1f~ = c'7 O~ ~ 1~ ~ I~ m Q1 IA f~ N O_ CO 1A~~O~mto~~cND~cDC~OC~DC00NCNDCD ~000~~~O~~NtOAtOA~QcNO~~cNOtp~! O d0 Ca M M ~ OD sf M 00 OD 00 00 00 OD O OD 00 00 ~ OD OD M O M GO O O O O O O ~ O O O r. ~- r ~ ~ t0 ~ ~ N ~ ~- r r r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~- ~- ~ ~ N W ~ ~ d W ~ ~~ ~ ~- ~ W awW ~ ~jQ~ ~ f~ J J W !n (~ a W~~ J ~ J '~ ~ O ~ '~ F- wZ wwcnpY--v~ ~z~~~ Q W=~z~w ag °° J zZ w»m-}~ ~oacn}_g z =UV,oQm zw ~- Ja W ~W~JO Q Z~UW~ =W Z~F-U a~ ~w O H~F-°OJQW (n~Q~~3Q OWUQ~obetf(g Ja_W_O U~ ~oD>QQ°~~~UotS~Z~g(n~ U~VotSa'a'~joifYOQ~N~SZ ottwZ ~F-,~oc~a~aasu'-~WQ~=°~0- }~~Qam=av-'wooaZ~ F-~aC9 m >zOQW~Wa~~f-~~ Www.~~ p~WZ >z- OW=Z~W~QQ~Jv) WQO W W J2 WJ HOcnO~Wpa}ZOa~ ~ a 0 »~ Z O Y Q Q W Z Q~~ w Z W d -~ ~ J W} Q~ Q~ W= Q J Q- Q Z~~'~}OQ~-~Q3~~a d~ ZQ}~2QdO~J~LL ~V JJ~~ ~ °W ~ ~ O -~ '~ U W ~ ° ~ a ~ ~ Z = m W 2 = ~ N Q Y Z > > J .J LL ~ 3 a (~ m Qn.= ~C9=WYE Q~F-~YUF-=(_n~U.QOW JaZZcn}OOp jz~}(9v~~?tn0°wOWwWWO~~aI-WQ=~-mO~-Q a~cnZ~ =O =ZUZOZOF-wJCnm~m~m Q ZOZUO~UQ~3JQ}-Q Wa~J2OaQF-QZ~QQ W WaQJa V~LLWa WOp~~ W~2W2~N J LL= a U° m~ fn Y O fn m J> 3~ a a 3~ Y}_= J Y~ D U cA m a a U LL 0 ~~~~+~'~ • N~00~_CI~OD_OOrNM~ Lc)~OI~CO ~A~OI~OOOO~ppr~pp~O1~~G~pp00~prp~~NMet1At01~00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 Oa0 O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~~ooooo0000oooooaooooo0000000ooooog~° MMV~vvv,~v,avvvvvvv~vvvvv•~•~vva~v~vva v OoDO ~00M M N O 0 0 0 0 c0 h~ ~1~ p ^ O ~ O ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ r I~ O I~ I~ f~ r N r O r r r 1~ tf) 1~ O I~ f~ f~ ~~~4~~~ o~oooo~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~ r O ` ° ~ ~ `r oooo i~ r ~~ o o ic io n ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ oo~~o r~o o ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ OOrO o Q Q Q to~$~LA ~~~~ ~aooooo rrlf~r O N N M M N N N O N 1~ r f~ 1~ (~ f~ (~ 1~ O ~ O ~" ~~~~~~ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU U Z N aaa~aaaa aaaaa a.a a ~aa c~c~c~ZC7c~t7t~gc~c~c~c~c~wc~c~wc~4aZC7O 0004ooooQOOOOOOOOOOa~oo LL~~~~Z~~~~~Z~~Z~~~~~ ~~aa~z z aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaOJaa ~mm~mmmm~m~m~mm~mm~~~mm 0 0 000 00 o z Q w w www ww w O aaaaaaaaaaaa~a 0000000~~o~oao mm~m~~m~mm~~m~ U O O OOOo00 O Zaaaa Opa aa~.~~~3~~~r~~ ~NVZZZZ ~~} }}~~~F=-aF-HF-cnI-F-.~H~Z(gcnf~fA ~pOH000~W~O~m~~~~~~~°,~~~~~ UHUmUUHQ~a~aaaUaa~QMmWWWW U~U~UU~~w~Ov~ic~nc~i~LL~nUxyxpUUUU GO O~ a~ O M N~ 00 O W N O Z ~D O p 01 m tf) tp N 00 O OO~a'~~OOOO~~MN O~~OmO OMNOOt N N O0 M a0 ~ r ~ d M ~t ~ ~ c0 M M p a~0 p O a~0 a~0 a~0 a0 r 00 M 00 00 00 r 00 CO ~ ~ r ~j r~ ~ r N r r r r r CO r r d r d r r r r r w ~~~~~~~ ~ ooooQOO o a s} J J J J J J J J ZZ~oOmmGD~mm m ~NwWWWWI-WW~W ~~ Z ~ Z~ ~ Z ~ Z ~ Z ~ O 0 U U ~ > > > > m > > x > M1~t0tC~N O r~tn ~aM~~~~~~~m~ r~ ~ r r r r r r r a r W W = W J a H H W U ~~ y~ W W Q ~~ HQ Z ~}~ WFw-m W O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w w U -~ Z ~ W ~ W ~ _ ~ N w O ' LLwa ~-wwz a z3~wv~i-, ~~"' ~z ~ w ~ zWNw a-W~m Wt-w~omo~g ~3a ~w ~ ~ _ (Q,')o~DO~ ~~~Q W~JLLQotSJF..? aW°~ a= ~~~'~otf ~JotS~ a~"~OF-a Oj~oiSW ~Z°i~~°~Lj ?aQ WN v~~~03wwa~ ~s~~?}~ }~~w}~~~aNaUa°O~.~nw.°o ~OZZ_QY~_~~Z_OJ=maim wLL=aaWZw~W(=jQp W~>=a,JU. aJ~O~aQYZ»zV~~~a LLazUZ~>Oa~gZQWZ~~OQ =U om~~ O a}~aa =~'aJa aw0~°°~oJLLOa_~pa- a z mazOJOw>~=m~_z z}LLm >aaq~ ~zazWm~ao~m~-wac~nQZaz= J zw=o3awLLa~ a u1OWaOW=~YW W~1- }~-> W(~=WaWma(~~ JWJ Z= >~J~~~ LI.-ZCna>OLL JJ LL Zm~J-~F. ~~ J~_WH3 ~~Q2~pOO~~OV~c=~wQ~~~=~QO~Na=Q?U2~aQQa c~=c~~n~m~=am=~ammc~~a~t~E-Y.c7cnLL~3ULLJV~a->>cnh-cn • • .-:. • O~O~Ntn~01~ OOO~ON ~ N N N N N N N N M O O O O O O O O O O O C CO CG OD GO d0 OD 00 00 GO GO 1~ NNNNNNNNNNC'O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ a ~ '~t ~ et st a d' tt r N O ~" ~ ~ ~ ti ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ f~ N N et ti ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 O ppti p~ p~ ~ ~ p~ p~ ~ N tf~ In ~A ~ ~ tt~ tf~ OOOQIO 0101010 aaaaaaaaaaa UUUUUUUUUUU aaaa aaaa wc~c~c~c~ c~c~~ON ooo~oZoooop ~ ~~~~~~~~~~Q cnUNtANmNV1tACAtn F- ~ ~ Z <„~ O ooQ~a~~~~o mmzoooooow ~~OwQwwww~ .~wwcn> »»g ~00~030000 zzw~o~~~~a ~aa~~z»»w x>> U a a a a a= OQ1.-~C0.3~NOOD~ m cD C0 0 ca O •7 M N O N O o~ a~ a~ c~ o~ i t s ~o a~ c~ o ~o oN i a~~~r-r-~~~~~ w V ~ a ~ ~ J f" Z a a a W W N W a ~ ~~ a U ~ w0 Q Z~ f-O_C~~ -~~~U2otsais N (7 Z W Z '7 J ~ }~OOci~s~W U .JoiiWpJ~wE'~Z ~~~LLO°_aw z~ aZ~aWwJ~~-'C7 >-uJ 2LLaW ZZ ~Q~Q~H-QZ>>=O a~~cn2clJU.aWU~ ~`~~~~ • Attachment 6 • ~tl~~~~® Salim Sagarchi SEI Corporation 14524 Oak Street Saratoga, CA 95070 October 4, 2004 Ms. Ann Welsh Assistant Planner, AICP City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 Dear Ann, Regarding the neighborhood meeting requested by the Planning Commission, we would like to inform you that after a couple of attempts, we were able to meet with the neighbors to review the final construction plans on May 8, 2004. many attempts were made to contact the neighbors via phone and fliers. With the ception of two, all other immediate neighbors were present at the meeting. During this meeting the construction plans were presented .to 'neighbors and the elevation and design details were reviewed. All who were pre ent approved these plans unanimously and signed the "Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application" which was submitted to you already. They were also anxious for us to start and finish this project ASAP, as the finished project would add value to the neighborhood. There were several attempts made to meet with one of the two immediate neighbors that were not present at the meeting. Several phone calls, personal meetings requests at his house, invitation to the neighborhood meetings, and visits to his residence have failed to get him to review our plans. These plans were changed due to his personal requests during the planning commission meeting and afterwards. He refused to show up in 4 pre- agreed meeting dates, never returned more than 10 voicemails, and refused to attend the last two meetings. Best Regards, Salim Sagarchi Cr ~~f~~~,. Open House Invitation ~ Sunday, May 6, 2004 HOSt: SEI Enterprise Location: Dorcich Orchard, 13089 Quito Road, in Saratoga Time: Thursday Mat 6, from 5:00 to 7:00 pm. I Please come and review our development plans. Meet the developers, ask them questions, check out the detailed plans and give them your feedback. • Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: l 3089 Ouito Road. Saratoga, CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterorise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Stafj"and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signoture on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the Ci of Saratoga My signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; I nderstand the scope of work; and I do NOT have any cone ns or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed ~oj~ ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I ~ have issues or concerns, which after diseassion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Name: r Neighbor Address: ,t ~~~~_~ ~ ~~~~ Neighbor Phone #: `'I 4 ~" 37 ~9- ~' ~~% Signature: Printed: ~iR4~c'~~~~ (.'itv nf,4nrntnvn Planninv nenartment Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Quito Road. Saratoga. CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not loaf favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta,,~"and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applica»t. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative ofall residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below you may rese a the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City ratoga My signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any conce or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed Proj~ ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Name: ~ ~~ ~ i h ~ ~'~. & o ' yu~ L Neighbor Address: ~ ~ o ~ 3 ~~; -t, k'aC. S o- ro-.fo `ja, C/~ `~ Sb 7 a Neighbor Phone # : ~' 08~ 3 7a ' ~ ~ ~ Printed: G~u7. ~ ; h. L,` ~, Planninv nenartment • • ~~~~~~~~ ('itv nl,Cnrntnfla • • • (~ Neighbor Phone #: ~ ,7 ~ J ~~~e rf f~' ~6(.~( Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Ouito Road, Saratoga. CA Applicant Name: SEI EnterJ~rise Application Number. The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fait to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta,~''and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the ~C,,ity~ of Saratoga. hd'My signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any conce ns or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed Proj~ ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Address: .- ~ C ,~~ f (.'itv nf~Glrntnan Pl~nnino nenartment Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Quito Road. Saratoga. CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterorise Application Number. The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Stajj"and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express airy concerns or issues they mcry have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative ofall residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga My signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; ~ understand the scone of work: and I do NOT have any concer or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):, r ~ Neighbor Name: ~~ ~--~~i+~ ~ ~eNJl Si "~'~~`'~S Neighbor Address: ~o?O Signature: .r v n ~ nrntnvn Neighbor Phone #: ~D~ - DSO -~ 0(e Printed: • J / n .t./ Tim ~ ~- ~ t'i~ .~ i,.b~~t`I.~ Plnnninv 1)ennrtment Neigbbor Notification Template for . Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Ouito Road, Saratoga, CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commissio» does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta,~"and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express arty concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative ofall residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below. y~ may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City f Saratoga signature below certifies the following: I have revie ,the project plans; I • understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any conce or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed Proj~ ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Name:l/ Neighbor Address: ~5~ y ~ Signature: ~ ~ ,/ 9 7 C Neighbor Phone #: 7'~0 ~/ / ~-'~ Printed: r~ (/G Z ~JEZ k"~~'r~'ru. ('itv nlRnrntnvn Plnnnino nennrtment Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: ~ 2 ~-~~ PROJECT ADDRESS: __ 13089 Ouito Road. Saratoga. CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta,~'ond the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express arty concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signoture on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City o Saratoga y signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; ~ understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any concer or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: i have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Name: ~~~.,1 ~ ~1 { ~ C ~~ Y ~~~ Neighbor Address: 4 (~ l ~ S ~~ v Neighbor Phone #: J~ 7 0 - ~S ~~ Signaturew~) Printed: / ~ ~ I~.l y~ ;1 ~. (.'itv nf,4nrntnvn Plnnninv nennrtment •1 L L r f •I r L •o l i ` 6 E 7>I~v ~1~ 1/ V r I Q 14 'O N Y N O f l i C 0 it r+11/ 7171fA0il Nlli~l `, Q~tyy ^ ~ V Y~ 0~ VO~l4rr-~.IOY~ 1'7~JIV~J ~ ~~ n ~ ~ SlO~lIHO~I`d ~ E# 101 ~Sf 10H IIA~N ~ ~ ~~ , ~~" ~131SJ10~1 H.U~~I ~ : ~ F ~ ~ ~} ~~ ~ i r~;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~ g ~ a F~ ~~~ Rc' ~~g yn~ ~F ~~ 3 ~ ~ ~ -~ lLC3~J ~ ~~~~ - M ~ y _~ Z~ Q ~ ~1~a ~~ ~~~ Q~ _~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~p~ ~~ Z~ ~ ~ ~ J ~~ 8 ~g~ 8 F b ~ ~ ~ Aga ~ ~ ~~~ _ ~~~ t ~ ~ ~~ F ~ ~ W g ~3 ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~_~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ r~ 3 z ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Z ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w Z ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~_ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ - _ ci o r ri ~i r ~~~~~ ~ ~8~~~ ~ 0 ~p - ~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ O U w Q U ~ ~ `~o~r~ .~.4JJ V ~ °x~ ~ ~0 J ~ ` W ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~. U ~ O ~"" s U w F ~ ~> ~ ~ ~~ x ~ ccccc ~~~~ J n n U Q ~ a o ~ ~ U ~~ ~ ~~~~~~ n ~ ~ U O Q o p ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~~ p Z y ~ = _ a~ ~~~~~~ s~ ~~~ F ~/ V ~~ Ill~~l JJ r I i i i ~- d ! S ~ 3 Y Z 1 ~ v ~ + ~ ' i r. ~~ 5 ~ ~ N • • {+ 1 ~~~ 'M r 5 ~~~'/, N N4Q I ~ ~ V N QY~ ~ ~' ~ ~.;. 0 m n ~~QI~v ~ O m ~ ~l'nvWirn a m 0 w 0 5 0 a 0 a 0 Y ~ ~~~ r-- ~~ ~ ~ W Oi ~ ~~ ~ o ~ ~ >- ~ ~ ~NG 1 N E ER ~c Y Q a ~ ~ S l~ ~y ~ Q ~ ¢¢, ~ O >~~(( , ``~~++ q~~~ J ~ V ~~~ ~ Q 3 W -" A-l tr "~ O ~1" 1~.~ ~ Q ~' i ~ d ag ~ a '~ v~ oz O~ .IQ ! ~,~ S~ ~ * ~ x' C7 j ~ ;tip, ~1 S 19 3~ ti ~ ~' U W A; ~ ~ .. I ~ r ,^ ', ,: I ~iiiAOl ~ ~~ ~R ~~ iS ~' ~' u ~ ~' ~ ~ a ~ ~ W~ g a~ ~~~ ~ of .. ' -~ ~ d ~ ~~ r ^ W 0 ~: ~' < .. Q ~~~~ Z J ^ n ~ p c4 ~~ r a~ ^^ b l N ~F U i .4LY ~ A I ~ , ~ -- l 11 ,! ~ _ f r •K I b !~`03/~OW3b ~9 1 30N3~ X3 ,.. __.._... _ f.;~~ ~- ~ L . a., ~~ ~ a.eoesees ~. ~ ;5S"fSl 3..5 L. t0 8 _. ..-~~ ~i~ ~ .SD'9Il ., ~~l` t. ,{, _._ __ ._.... ,,. sir e ~ ~ ,_~~ .. ~ir., '. ..; ~, .~. . N /~ ffl VY'CLC lit? t' --- - _ _.. - _ __ _. _. on n IC ~_/ ~ ~ '~. ~~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P ~ ~o ~ ~ , ~~ ~ ~~~~~ >o ~ lR _._ . ~ ~ r ~ ~ a -_ ~., \ apt ` ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ( ~~,, ( '~' _. / . ~ + / ~,. ~ ~ I- / n 1 / ~ ~f ~ ~ ~_. _. ' ` ~ ~ ,Cs'S6 - ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ , ~ / ` ._. ~ _. _~ -.... -,:- - -in:--_- __,.~ ~ ~ to i ~~ ~ M T - ~ i ~ 1 l ~ j~ / 8 ~'`` A ~ 8 ~1l ~~ ~ ~ ~ M At10 X t Yr d 1' ~ '~ ,J 1 • • • ~~~~INEE ~v o ~ ~ ~ ~ a Q~ k ~ ~n ~ ~ ~s ~~ s ~~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ p .r ~Z~ i r a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~° ~ x ~QO~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ aO ~~31 S 19 3 ~~ *S C) ~ tr ~ 2 rn g ~ ~~i ~ ~ ~ , ~i~~ ~ ~ ~ 6 p ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ p ~ ~~ ~ , A ~ ~~ ~ ~ >,t .z . t s ~ ~ a-- Ir ~ ~ $ o f 0 ~ ~ #~ ., t5 i3 is LS ~ LS ~ t1 ZS ~~~~~~8~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ® i >5 R tS i i J ~ s~ ~~- t~~so~a~ I ~~~aa~~~~W~~~~~n~€dsts sR~~~e~ ~ x ~;~ ~i ~~~ ~,=; ~. j s _...~ ,a -- ~ s ~ ~ a ~~ r ~~ ~ ~ .c-, ~ ~ 0 ', .~ ~~ ~ A~ . , t-. +t _J At H W m Q' U I ~I ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ J~ ~VV ~~~ 13 ¢ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~~ ~ Y o w O ~ ~~~ 3u~ ~~ ~ >_ _ tl..,. ~ ~ ~ ~~ i ~ K n f ~ ~ / Q. J ~ .. 3 ~ _ I r W b s ' `~' ~ 3 -~ ~ ~ r a ~ i I e. .s~~ ~~ o ~ I I I ~ • • i • i ~ ~O i i~/i ~' ~.~ Q~ ~'~~ G<c ~ ~ i i ~ .' i i~~, ,~ P I I I ~ I ~- ~ J F ~ r~ ~ ~~ o~ I I ~. L - - .a :lam ~~ ~~ ~~ ~1 ~' ~J ~ 1 ~i l l ~~ » ~l ~~ ar\~ ~~ ~l ~l ~l ~, ~ ~ \J ~` ` 1 ~i a,. -1 _ Ci _~~ LB L II m `~ \ ~ ~ ~ ® J ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~' `i ~ l i-~\ ~ `/ ( ~o ~ ~~ 1 i ~ • ~ `J ~ l~ 1~ I CV J °~ ` r t O(~LBALo~ ~ 1 ~ J F ~ ~ ~ I s ~~ j ~~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ f ' O ; ~ f r ~ a >~ ~ ! --- ~~~ ~ O n ~ 1 ~~ \ !• ~ / \ ~~ ~ ~ '~~ I ~ ~ ~ 3 i~ ~70 ` / ~ ~d 1 i~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ \ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~~ i ~ - ~ _~ y\. .00'S9 ~. "~' - - ._ / h^^ cso-rw-eor ~ I If oso-~w-eoc f ~ I ~_ z-~ I ~ ~~ ~ I f ~ I 1 I ~-- _. b r tS f f i t $- ^I j~ T ~ I 1 I ~ ° i t - ~ I sl I I f t 1 ~Y O N +~ _ ,~V I NW 17 P{~ ~~ ~- ILO-Lm-{1p- ' tao-czo-co- 1 1 ~____ root n ao r. is ~o uqI M'-ta~01~1~I's1gIT~ 7 I 7/ ~I ~/ ff If ~~ Y i~ O.t I i ,,, , ~ ~~^c- ~ ~Z ~ -~~o-eoc L'~ 7p ~ l ~ / ~' l~ ~ `~ `~ `~ X3'1 \~ ~i \p-~ 1 \ J ~ ~~ '~, iT J `~ ~~ ~\ ~ 1 TTT»i zf M ~ ', `~ `~ `~ r `~ J r i \~ ~~ `Jl /` ' lJ ~l ~ J ~~ ~ I \ ~ ~ ~ ~ L+ ~l I ~ ~ ~ ` ~ , 3 ~ ~ ~j -~ ~ ~ '~ 1 ~ ~ ~ `~ `/ ~1 ~1 `~ ~~ ~ 1 ~ ` 1 t ~ ~ I ~~ V ~i i Zi I 1 I ~I iaanolr3u ~Im xa- ,SO'9l l1 1 ' -- ~ ~O ~-~ ~`i r ~ ~ l \~ `/ ~ ` ~~ ao D 1 r - --I _ ~ 1 L ___ ' I-r---- --i-__I-__--- '' 2 I I oao-tiw-ws ~, I T ~~ I ~ __ I ~ ~ ~L 1 ~ . r1_ ~ _-- i I I us ,wa x~-1p~` I I I us ~ ,p - - - - - ~ ' ~ ivLLr4o~a ~ ~ I 1 j f ~ I ( t I ~ I I I 1 I i f (1 1 ~ 1 aor ~ '£SZ='d_S 1.111 ~ ~ ~y i V .t 1 OLO.,.~.,,~ 1 -_-_ aso-a~o-ror ~-__~' sLO~LO~o- `~~ ~~~~. xvJ LLfi'Irl'Oli I~1 Llfi'Irl'Oli o~sfr vo ~I>rvwsN '^~v Noii>rt~o>r I~~s I/IV 11iliA0i1 Mllill S1~3UH~d ~~1SJl0~l I-W~~I i I i i i i i i -._.L._._._.-.-I-~-~-~-~- I- ~- f/4 i r- - - -- I - - _ _ - - i I ~ ~s ~ i I I ~ ~, ' I I . ~, . I ,'~ ,,;4 ~ ~'~x"~ I I ~ ~ .•j ,r~i. .j ~ ( ~ / / _._._.~ ~ ~ J i . .KU - I- aoa-aiar lY .I i . I ~ ~ .~ ~ ,. I i ~ ~~: , I ~ :,t'.; L ~~ • i r I -.._ ~ - ~~ ~,\ ~~~ "~~\ `, \` ~~~ '~ 1 , ,~ • • ~ I I I ~I~ I ii dl L-~ VFW ViiN VR/irr-VOrI"1VW :~~~ a~ ' n ` ~.: ~ISf lOH N ~ :w ~~~~~ t i --- __ ,,; ~ ~~j I~ I ; I I f ~~ i I L ~~ ~~ _. 1Y1100 MOO MOO .~1~ !~ ~~ ~`; ~ I - J I ~. .. ~ _..~,.__.. ,, - _ - ~; ( ~ _...- I ,_ t( _ ,, ,, . ! ., ~< ~ _ - _~ - `~ ~ ~~ " I ' } - - ~ I` ~, ,'~ ' . -1.... ---- j \ I it ~ ~% I a ~ . 1i ~ '~{'~ ~ I i i ~ t. i I ~ i I ~ ~ -- ~ i ~. . I- ~. _ _ ' i ` t I I r ~ ! ~ I .. ! ~ '! ~ ? " , .~ I ~ ~ ( j'. I , /a I I ~~~~~~~~ -~ • x~r LL1'i'Irl'OI! 1~1 LLfi'Irl'OI! Oli~lr '1/D 7111~/MiN ~swv Noiiti~ootl lid! 1ll~I biliA0i1 M11>t!1 S1~3JJH~ ~131S~10l~ I-W~I ,•`^'_ ~Od OlYlO 880E1"~VH~I~ ~,y/.~~ Y~ ~~ i:~4 F `~~ U ~~~ E 101 ~IS-f 10H N ro''r::, ~'~ ~. ~~ q 6 ~' ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ __ _~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~. ~_. I § I ~ i i ~--- ~ ~ . I ~ ~ ~, I I ~ ~ i I ~ ~ I ~ ri~ I I ~\ ~~ 31 I 7 \ ~ lino ~~r CIE--------- =--•--~= ~r~r.~oa 0 _ ~' O I ~ I \ .. ~ -.'4, ,, ~ ~ i I i ~ry •~ •• _ "' I .~ ,, 'wl I I \ 1 om , I ~ ~ ... ' , low • .. I I ~:\. I I I I I I I I I I 100' I ~o ~ ri m'~ N ~~ ~ J ~ ' . I t ~ .%:• .. ~ i 4~•. / ::. :':.~ L . •'_` . ... I .,.. - IU I I" ~",.~' ~ ~ ry ... ... - m I I ._ ._ _..... _.. , .. ~ ~ ~ . ~ i I J~ ~ I ;~ I N , ~- .,I . LLQ I I I P I ~ _ I ..,_....._._ _.___.,.~.___ I ~ I I I I ~ _ = I I I ' ~ - I ~ -- -~ ------ I L~------- ..,~ .\ .` ~~~ ,~ b ~~~~~ ,~~~ "~ _\\\ ~,\ ,._ • _.., a .~ ..... ._ .. .. ,.._... _...... ... _ ... _ _. S~ I .~ . - _.. ~ I ~~ L ~_ I I I is ~, I - ~ t ~I _ ':i i I I T I ~ r` ~~ { ,;, fi ~`" ~ , Y ... .. F ~" I~ J I t •----- _ fir- - J I ~ L J ~ ; , i 4. s ., xvr LL1i'IrL'Oli 1 •1 ~ ~ f s •I r i •o I i L00-'6'to-®@~2 ~NdH ~dJ '~ MV8 Oiifr Y7 11i1~MiN ~y~/~ iH1/ NO7111if011 If1i ~~QiwR/~~-~H~~ ~ ~~ i~ 1/l1/ biliA0i1 Nili)1 H~d~OV8 ~ ~ s Q S1~3UH~l~d E 101 ~Sf lOH ~N # ~~ ~ ~31SJ10~1 H.U~~I ~ 1 ~ `~ ~ ~~ _. ~~ - o,,,a , ~ I ~ ~ ~-- ~ ~ --------~ I ~ J I I 00 00' 00 ~ Lna ~ x I I I I O ~I a ~ ~' x~c~cKxx~c ~~~~~~~~ f 1~~ ~®®A® _ 0 r ~ ~~ • • xsr LLfi'I~L'Oli 1~1 LL>f'IrL'Oli O~iI~ YO ~111~IMiN env Noilys+.oti 11~i ~/I'I 11iliA0i1 Mlli~l S1~3UH~d ~13LSJlON I-W~I coo-rio-eee x~de~ va avoe o~ eeoa ~~ ~ ~ N E 10"1 3SflOH a I ~ ~_ o~ I ° I I ~ i o ~ 0 I ~~ !!!~~l~ ;;____ ®~ i°~ n a ~ , ,_ _. xvr LL>f'I-L'Olf Ivl LLfi'IrL'Oli OIfIr Y7 ~Ii1VMiN 'i/~V NOfllli~011 Ifli 'I 11/ 1lilfdOil Mllill S1~3UH~Id ~131S~10l~ F-W~i 1 ~i ~~ i~ L. L v ~ _J • • I • V•W Vii N ~~ ~7V1 ~~ E 101 ~Sf10H , ~-• a ~i a xvr LLfi'IrL'Oli Ivl LLfi'IrL'Oli Olif~ Y9 1111+IMiN iH1/ NOi111i1.Oll If1i 1/1~/ tiiliA0i1 Nili)1 S1~3UH~d ~13LSJl0~l H.U~~I coo-~o-ees x~dv ro~ avod ono eeoa-advH~o ~ ~ ~ E 10~ 3St10H N ~ a 1 i L J I I ___ I _ J i~~ xvr LLfi'I~L'Oli I~1 LL1'i'IrL'Oli ~.V~IFa~WE~iOV ~V ~~ ppp 01ifr 1/0'l111\-MiN i/-'I NOilililOil If•i 'II`I 11i1iA011 Nilill ~~Ql~-0 ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~J3LS~l0lJ H.U~~I E 101 ~Sf10H N • ~ • ., x~r LLf!'IiL'OI! ~ 1 L L f f 'I i L 'O I i ~.V~I W voE 7~A • 1I V OIiIi YD'l1111/MiN * ~ iH1/ NO{111ii011 If1i ~/IV biifAOil Mili~l ~~Q~p-~~O ~ ~ ~~ •/'- S1~~lIH~d u ~ fi~ I ~ Q ~13LSJl0~l H.U~~I E 101 ~Sf10H ~N ~ ~ I I ~~- I ~ I ~ I 1 __ _ ~ I I I ~_ ~- ~ ' , ------- I ~ I i i 1 I ~ I I ~ I l ~----~ ' ' 1 I 1 I I I I I L---- ----------- __ 11~ ~ y ~ a ~~Z~z; ~ a 9 ~ ~ 8 tl ~o ° a za=i~ rr~tz \\ ~ Y F ~ r ~~~ g -O p ~~ ~Q ~ ~ ~~~* g~ Y~-• f ~rr,. . S k. ~. F.. U W F Y rl«I~J~d :._ k~ ~ ~:~ z~ -- x_. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~--- n e F ~... ~ ~ ~... b Y ~`~OP_ , K a ~.. i ~ ~ ~, , _ F ~ 3 ~ ~ +e,.a Z b 0 ~, a~~a3 i . ~ s /o =ynn ~ ~ iii y 7J d~ 77 Z ~ ~ 1 a J C 1 ~ I P-.G i 8 4 0 F- - _.- _ e ~ k tiro ~ ~i1Nf ~1~ ~' a -~ i K M ~ b~ r x ~ ~.~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~ N ~i A ~ d a v } ,, ------ :----------~ o i ~"_~ L - C 0 S w -~ U ~ ~ z 8 ~ ~ 3 i , i ~~~ ~~. ' 1 ! , ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ C ~ + ~. F a '^ U Q C~ .1--~ { _~ (/~~ \ ~(~J 1' ~1 r_ 0 F t ~ ~ ~ O~ F~ a~~ ~ v~ ~ yynnn ~~J+=: ~a~ .._ < less= , a ~ ~ d J~~ Sg~ a ~^ ~4~ ~ , ~ Z ~~}~' ~ r v I s-y ~q ~~~ ; 3 d 3~ ~., ~~~ ~ ~ 3 Z ~~ k , ~~~ ~a o ~ o:x ~~~ ~®a® ~l Q ap^< ~ ~ _ ~ I ~ o ~ ~ ~ I ~ Q ~M~ J Z Q U ~ ~ a ~1r Q o ~ i -- ~ ~~ -----rt-- ----- --..- - -.._-_~_T w $ a ~; ~i ~~,8 al~;: s,~: J J ~~ $. ~T ;;~ .a ..., J •+wn 4~9,C Q r ~ ao ` ~i ~ $~ ~Y ~ _~ ss i~ - A~ 'r T ., ., ., - - ~ 7~~ ~ _ ~ ~~ ~ , z ~g ,~ Y4 ~~ ~~ ~ 9 ~ . x j :1 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ Y ~ ~ ~ a a `` dt ~ ~ yR~. W ~ F r~ 22 J Z+ YLii ~ ~~[ i ~a ~ d ~~ ~ , ; boo ~ z -~- x ~ r, _ ~.. ~. ~- ~ K >t O ~ N Q r C~ -- ~~~ 8 i~ J .~. a Z ~ ~ ® YT 'v } ~. ~ ~ 8 • ~i ~•ir J ~~ H --- I ~ Q ~ ~ ~ Y ~~z ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ k ~ ~ °°~ ~ ~r ~~~~ i, ~ ~~~~~~ I~ ~E ~ S1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ a 1 ~ iK o o~ d ~~ r ]~ ~ ~ ci ZR~ ~ > ~~aa -~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ n ~ ~ s ~ ~~ ~~ ~ a ~ O ~ . ~ ~ ,a ~~,~ t I ~- I Y ~ ~ ~ ,~ I i '~ ~ I I ~ y ~ i f t { om IT t [ J I I /~ I` I ` uvss ~ ~ ~ ~ v • b~tt • ~j ~ . ai s a `s -- u g ~ ------ __'~, -- 3AIFln YFIlk1Vw I '' Y - I I z ~ j~~ € j ~ ~ d I 4 S ~ Opt ~2 + I O Y ~~ ~ ~ I I ~~ O r ~ i' ~ 3 ~ ~_ I. a'll \ ~ i`' a } I ~- _ 1 ,.4 -- ,~ E i ~~ z ~. ~ Z Z o ~ r ® ~ ~n. d$ A°"S' ~~ ~s o~$ ag ~ ~_ Y ~ ~ ~ ~C O ~~ 3 2~2 >~_ ~~ ~~~ ~~~i~~ ~ c~ ~ .~~ tf rli i ` I~~l f iltl -- _ - --- ---------- i • -------- -_.-__-r------- - ------ aNO ~ -+~ ~ O I O ~ ~ I Q J Z ~ Q ~ a i Q ~ $ ~ ~ S a~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ - f ~ o e8 000 °oL~~~o ~ w wYpp~ f'6o ~~ C a L w L ~e°`r ~ao~fo_ ~~'~~=o ct~~ ~$'_ _ ~ « ~ ~~'€ t_-~~ ~eo~a-8 l~~o~ H~I~~IOQ ~ s~a~ SNd~d 3dd~SQNJd~ ~I 0 I _ __ -_ _ a d S 6 ~~ L U i C T U d N C -a ~L O~ c o c a3a ' I M ! n 0 0 qr ? 3 i N L O s y N L a '' ° i d O ~ N i d c o rn ° N a d ~ U C y p d E ~+ d ' D 4 N~ L y C N P O D O OI N U O y E fN' 4 0 N ~ a '~ ~ M E i ~ _ ~+ W E C t o O C T 7 U U 4 r 4 ~= O i i i ~ l` y~ {i a i ~ L C~~ H O + > d ry 0 C i' ~ y 4' ~ l ~ - Z = d +' C C Q N C C Q C S i _ _ f y~~ a~ C d U a O a ~ _a ~ d .E O V W 9 U E V a +E+ '6 O .~ a C L O ~ ~ ~~ Ol j 0~ u~~ i ~ ~ J W U L7 Q ~ N W a s C W i C a C ~ O I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( _ . `` r , ~/ rI~~ 2 ~ , a o i ~ c i i'r a Q ~I I ~I I ~ ~ J d W ~ p a v Q = u U U m \ Z ~ J A • • Item 3D REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No./Location: 04-131/ 13089 Quito Road -Lot 4 Applicant/Owner: Salim Sagarchi Staff Planner: Ann Welsh, AICP, Associate Planner Date: November 10, 2004 APN: 389-14-37 Department Head: ~ _ Q 500 ft radius AD .13089 Quito Road 500 ft parcels I VD • ~--- RD 13089 Quito Road -Lot 4 {~~®~Oi # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot 4 13089 Quito Road , EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY Application filed: Application complete Notice published: Mailing completed: Posting completed: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 5/6/04 10/15/04 10/27/04 10/26/04 10/15/04 This Design Review application is a request to construct atwo-story structure on a 13,371 square foot lot located in the R-1, 10,000 zoning district at the end of the cul-de sac, Dorcich Court. The home is designed in a neo-craftsman style with lap siding, lightweight concrete brown the roof. The home is located within a new subdivision that was the former site of the Dorcich Orchard. The home is intended to be compatible architecturally with the historic farmhouse that is retained on lot 5 of the subdivision. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Design Review application with conditions by adopting the Resolution for Application # 04-131 ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft Resolution 2. Key Map of Parcel 3. Arborist Report dated May 28, 2004. 4. Fire Department report dated May 25, 2004 S. Affidavit of Mailing 6. Neighborhood Correspondence 7. Plans, Exhibit "A" • • ~~~~®~ #04.128 /Design Review -Lot 4 13089 Quito Road , STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R-1,10,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: M-10 -Medium Density Residential MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE:13,371 square feet AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: Average Slope of the lot is less than 10% GRADING REQUIRED: No grading of the site is proposed. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed project consisting of a slrigle-family residence is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-family residences. The project site is in an urbanized area and is connected to utility and roadway infrastructure. MATERIALS AND COLORS PROPOSED: The house is to be tan lap siding with brown roof tiles. • l~~®~~ # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot 4 i 13089 Quito Road PROPOSED CODE REQUIREMENTS LOT SIZE 13,371 sQ. FT. 10,000 sQ. Fr. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE 22%. 60% Building Footprint 1,919 sQ. i; r. Walkways, Patio, Driveway ~St 973 sQ. Fr. Sound wall TOTAL 2,892 sQ. FT. 7,257 sQ. FT FLOOR AREA MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE Main Floor 1,919 sQ. i~ r. Second Floor 1,485 sQ. FT. TOTAL 3,404 sQ. Fr. 3,880 sQ. Fr. SETBACKS MINIMUM REQUIREMENT Front 25 I~ r. 25 Fr. Rear 1ST FL. - 36 FT. 5 IN. 1ST FL- 25 FT 2ND FL - 36 FT. 5 IN. ' 2ND FL. 35 FT. North Side (R) 1ST FL-37 FT. 10 IN. 1ST FL -10 FT. 2ND FL-40 FT. 10 IN. 2ND FL-15 FT. South Side 1ST FL -10 FT. 1ST FL -10 FT. 2ND FL - 21 FT. 2ND FL -15 FT. Height Residence 25 FT. 26 FT. •i ~~®®~~ a # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot 4 13089 Quito Road PROJECT DISCUSSION Design Review This Design Review application for Lot 4 involves review of a two story home with a design that is based somewhat on the Craftsman style which is typified in the Historic Mitchell house that is to be relocated from the center of the parcel onto Lot S. The elevations depict a home with lap siding and lightweight concrete tiles that resemble slate shingles. In terms of the front facade, a low profile front entry with porch overhang is proposed. The entry door is bracketed by a double row of sidelights and single row of transom lights. The porch columns are detailed with rock wainscoting typical of the Craftsman style. An arched window at the stairway is proposed in the front facade. The design of the house has some of the detailing that is typically associated with Craftsman style dwellings but the character of the house would be enhanced with additional details that reIlect this style. The use of exposed rafter beams at the eave is suggested to add additional texture and depth to the facade. The garage door should also reIlect the Craftsman theme of the subdivision with multiple pane divided lights in the upper panel of the door. These details in the design of the house are recommended by staff in order to enhance the character of the development. The site plan proposes four drywells to minimise sto water runoff in response to the site design regulations mandated by the Santa C ara Watershed C-3 Permit issued by the. Regional Water Quality Control Board. Sound Wall Since Lot 4 abuts Quito Road along the rear property line, the plans depict a sound wall. The plans provide details of the proposed sound wall, which do not reIlect the character of the area or the preferences of the neighbors. The feedback from the neighbors in the subdivision process indicated that there is a strong preference for a wooden wall along Quito Road to reIlect the landscaping and wall of the homes to the east across Quito Road. Correspondence from the neighbors during the subdivision process reIlected this concern. For this reason staff recommends denial of the sound wall portion of the plans for Lot 4. Necessary Findings The Zoning Ordinance, Section 15-45.080 identifies the following findings as necessary for granting Design Review approval. (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. (b) Preserve natural landscape. (c) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. (d) Compatible bulk and height. (e) Employs current grading and erosion control methods. (f) Utilizes Residential Design Guide policies and techniques. Q~'~®Q'~ # 04-128 /Design Review - iot 4 13089 Quito Road Actval Findings The following findings have been made regarding the proposed new construction. (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views andprivacy. The height, elevations andplacement on the site of the proposed main or accessory structure, when considered with reference to: (i) the nature and location of residential structures on adjacent lots and within the neighborhoods; and (ii) community view sheds will avoid unreasonable interference with views andprivacy. The proposed two-story dwelling will not interfere unreasonably with views and privacy. The home has a 37 foot 10 inch setback from the adjacent northern property line. This exceeds the minimum side yard setback by 27 feet 10 inches at the first floor and 30 feet 10 inches at the second floor. Furthermore, the northern facade has no windows on the second floor. This feature also m?nimizes the impact on privacy for the abutting property to the north of the lot. • The two-story design of the structure allows the impervious coverage to be minimized. The plans propose 22% impervious coverage while 60% is the maximum allowable. This design furthers the mandate of the Regional Water Quality Control Board to minimize storm water runoff and decrease impervious coverage. If the home were single story, the impervious coverage would be greater and the on-site water retention would be more difficult to achieve. Moreover, the immediately adjacent neighbors indicate support for the two stories dwelling adjacent their property. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. The natural landscape will be preserved insofar as practicable by designing structures to follow the natural contours of the site and minimizing tree and soil removal; grade changes will be minimized and will be in beeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed areas and undeveloped areas. The plan proposes to retain the existing topography and minimize grading. Development on this lot would impact 3 trees all of which are on adjacent property. Since the plan does not propose to remove existing trees and depicts impervious coverage of 22%, this reflects sensitivity to the design guideline of preserving the natural landscape. (c) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. The proposed main or accessory structure in relation to structures on adjacent lots and to the surrounding region will minimize the perception of excessive bulk and will be integrated into the environment. The design does not depict excessive bulk. Although a second story is proposed, the area of the second floor in relation to the first floor is proportional and the varying roofline serves to minimize the perception of bulk. The added design details ~~'®~~~ #04.128 /Design Review - L,ot 4 13089 Quito Road recommended in the project discussion would also serve to vary the facade, add texture to the front facade and minimize the perception of bulk. (d) Compatible bulb and height. The proposed main or accessory structure will be compatible in terms of bulh and height with (I) existing residential structures on adjacent lots and those within the immediate neighborhood and within the same zoning district; and (ii) the natural environment; and shall not (iii) unreasonably impair the light and air of adjacent properties to utilize solar energy. The proposed two-story home is located in a neighborhood that is predominantly single story in character. However, the existing historic Mitchell house, which is the design inspiration for the proposed home, is a two-story structure and the Lot 4 design reflects this style. (e) Current grading and erosion control methods. The proposed site development or grading plan incorporates currentgradingand erosion control standards used by the City. The proposed design retains the natural topography since changes to the grade surrounding the house are minimal. Also the plan reflects the mandate by the Regional Quality Control Board to limit impervious coverage and storm water runoff. The proposed drywells are designed to slow runoff and retain the first flush of storm water. (~ Design policies and techniques. The proposed home will c form to each of the applicable design policies and techniques set forth in the Residential Design andbooh The above analysis supports the conclusion that he findings required for granting design review approval can be met provided the applicant carries out the conditions outlined in the resolution of approval. The City Arborist and the Santa Clara County Fire District have reviewed this application. Their comments are included as conditions of approval. • ~~~®~~ # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot 4 13089 Quito Road Neighborhood Input Resolution #03-049, which granted tentative subdivision approval of this lot, required that the applicant hold a meeting with the surrounding neighbors to obtain a consensus on the design of the homes within the subdivision. Attachment # 5, which is included in this staff report, contains the notices that were signed by the surrounding neighbors. The map below depicts that the property owner abutting the lot along the northern property line (the north east corner of the subdivision) approved the design of the proposed home. ® Neighbor Approval Granted 13089 Quito Pnad RD AV AV RD T 180 240 300 ft RD • ~fu'®~Q~ # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot 4 13089 Quito Road , CommUnityDevelopment The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A", New House Lot 4, Salim Sagarchi, Dorcich Orchard, 13089 Quito Road, Saratoga prepared by Keith Royster, Architect, dated 2/10/03, date stamped 10/28/2004. The conditions of approval identified in this report shall be incorporated into the revised plans. 1. The design shall be revised to enhance the architectural detailing in the facade and reflect Craftsman style architecture. Exposed rafter beams at the eaves are required to meet the design review guidelines. The garage door should continue the Craftsman theme of the subdivision with multiple pane divided lights in the upper panel of the door. These details in the design of the house are required in order to enhance the character of the development. 2. Four sets of complete construction plans incorporating required revisions and this Resolution on a separate plan page shall be submitted to the Building Division. 3. The landscape plan shall be installed prior to granting final planning approval of the project. 4. Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. 5. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscaped area. 6. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. 7. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. 8. Proper maintenance of landscaping, with minimal pesticide use, shall be the responsibility of the property owner. 9. The site plan shall be stamped and signed by a Licensed Land Surveyor who verifies the accuracy of the boundaries. 10. Prior to pouring of foundation, the setbacks identified in the approved plans shall be verified by a licensed land surveyor. This verification shall be documented by a signed and sealed statement from the Surveyor. This statement shall be submitted to the building inspector prior to pouring foundation. ~~'~®~~ # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot 4 13089 Quito Road 11. The sound wall design shall be revised to provide a durable wall with solid wood facing along Quito Road. The wall at the property line shall not exceed 8 feet in height. 12. The plan data on sheet SP-1 shall be revised to correct the impervious coverage ratio. The impervious coverage is 22% as per the submitted data. 13. A six-foot high wooden privacy fence shall be installed along the northern property line, which abuts Lot 4. Fire Protection District The Santa Clara County Fire District reviewed this application on May 25, 2004 and their requirements are included as conditions of approval: Required Fire flow: the fire flow for this project is 1,000 gpm at 20-psi residual pressure. The required fire flow is available from area water mains and fire hydrants(s), which are spaced at the required spacing. 2. Public Fire Hydrant Required: Provide 1 public fire hydrant at locations to be determined by the fire department and the San Jose Water Company. Hydrants shall have a minimum single flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual with spacing not to exceed 500 feet. 3. Timin of re wired water supply installations: Installa ons of required fire service g q and fire hydrants shall be tested and accepted by the F' e Department prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible material .Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested and accepted. 4. Garage Fire Sprinkler Required: An approved automatic fire sprinkler system designed per National Fire Protection Association Standard #13D and local ordinances, shall be provided for the garage. To ensure proper sprinkler operation, the garage shall have a smooth, flat, horizontal ceiling. 5. Fire Apparatus Access Roads Required: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15%. Installations shall conform to Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications. 6. Fire Department Engine Turn Around Required: Cul-de-sac diameters shall be no less than 72 feet. 7. Parking long roadways: The required width of fire access roadways shall not be obstructed in any manner and parking shall not be allowed along roadways less than 28 feet in width. Parking may be permitted along one side of roadways 28-35 io s ~®~~~ # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot 4 13089 Quito Road feet in width. For roadways equal to or greater than 36 feet, parking will be allowed on both sides of the roadway. CityArborist Report The City Arborist reviewed this project and prepared a report dated May 28, 2004. The recommendations of this report are included as conditions of approval. The proposed project on this lot would impact three trees of Ordinance size (#20, 21 and 35). They include one Coast Redwood (#20), one Modesto Ash (#21) and one California Black Walnut (#35). Each tree is planned for retention. Per Ciry Ordinance, a bond equal to 100% of the appraised value of these trees, which is $2,515, is required to promote their protection. The three trees are situated on neighboring properties and were inventoried for this report, as their root zones are vulnerable to construction damage. The September 11, 2002 arborist report identifies 36 fruit trees of Ordinance size scattered throughout the property. Many are dead while the others appear in overall poor condition. For this reason, their removal is appropriate and mitigation is not suggested. 1. Tree protective fencing shall be installed prior to any demolition, grading, surface scraping, construction or heavy equipment arriving on ite. It shall be comprised of five- to six-foot high chain link mounted on two-inc diameter, galvanized steel posts, driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced n more than 12 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undis rbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspecti n. 2. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the fenced areas (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: grading, surface scraping, trenching, storage and dumping of materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 3. Protective fencing shall remain installed throughout the landscape installation phase. Small openings can be created at that time (i.e. only immediately before landscape construction begins) to only allow for foot traffic and wheelbarrow access. 4. The surveyed locations of tree trunks #21 and 35 must be shown on all future site, grading and drainage, and landscape plans submitted to the Ciry. 5. Upon being available, plans showing grading and drainage, irrigation, and underground utilities shall be reviewed by the City for tree impacts. 6. All underground utilities (i.e. water, gas, sewer, electrical) and drainage features (such as drain lines, swales and dissipaters) must be designed outside from beneath canopies of retained trees. # 04-128 /Design Review - I.ot 4 13089 Quito Road 7. Supplemental water shall be supplied every two weeks to each retained tree during the months of April thru November. This should begin at the start of grading and continue through construction. A rate of 10 gallons per inch of trunk diameter is recommended to be applied using soaker hoses placed on the soil surface beneath the mid- to outer-canopies. 8. All underground pipes and irrigation lines planned for removal beneath the canopies of retained trees should remain buried and cut off at existing soil grade. 9. Imgation trenches should be designed no closer than 10 times the trunk diameter of trees being retained. Where this is not feasible, the irrigation system must be a drip- type system placed on top of existing soil grade. 10. Irrigation spray should reach no closer than three feet from a tree's trunk (including those of newly installed trees). All forms of irrigation for new trees must be of a drip- type system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. 11. Lawn or other plant material requiring frequent watering must comprise no more than 20-percent of the area beneath a tree's canopy. All other plant material should be drought tolerant. 12. Mulch, stones or other landscape features must be placed no closer than one-foot from the trees' trunks. Bender board should not be installed and tilling of the soil should not occur within 10 times the diameter of the nearest trunk. 13. Herbicides should not be used beneath tree canopies. Where used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. 14. The pruning of trees must be performed under the supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. Information regarding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained by referring to the following website: http://www.isa-arbor.com/arborists/arbsearchhtml. Conclusion The proposed residence is designed to conform to the policies set forth in the City's Residential Design Handbook and to satisfy all of the findings required within Section 15- 45.080 of the City Code if developed with the recommended conditions. The residence will not interfere with views or privacy, preserves the natural landscape and will minimize the perception of bulk. The proposal if developed with conditions and revisions, will satisfy all other zoning regulations in terms of allowable floor area, setbacks, maximum height and impervious coverage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Design Review application with conditions by adopting the Resolution for Application # 04-131. • 12 ~~~~Z~ • Attachment 1 • ~~©®~,~ # 04-128 /Design Review -Lot 4 13089 Quito Road RESOLUTION N0.04- APPLICATION N0.04-128 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sagarchi/ 13089 Quito Road -Lot 4 WHEREAS, the Ciry of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review approval to construct a 3,404 square foot, two story home on Lot 4, a 13,371 square foot lot in the recently approved Dorcich Orchard subdivision. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and Whereas the project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construc ion or conversion of up to three single-family residences. The site is in an urba ized area and is connected to utility and roadway infrastructure and involve the construction of one single family home; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Design Review approval, and the following findings have been determined: Policy 1, Minimize the perception of bulk The design uses architectural features to break up massing. The house is two story with a cross gabled roof which reduces the mass of the roofline. The covered, porch with simple front door with sidelights and transom is low profile in design and proportion. Policy 2, Integrate structures with the environment The design preserves the natural landscape, since the plan proposes to retain the existing topography and minimal grading is proposed. Development on this lot would impact 3 trees all of which are retained. Retaining three protected size trees on this lot reflects sensitivity to the design guideline of preserving the natural landscape. Also, having impervious coverage of 22% minimises the impact on the environment. ~Q'~®~~- Policy 3, Avoid interference with privacy The home exceeds the minimum required setback by over 27 feet at the first floor and over 30 feet at the second floor. Furthermore, the northern facade has no windows on the second floor. These features minimize the impact on privacy for the abutting property to the north of the lot. Policy 4, Preserve views and access to views The proposed two-story dwelling will not interfere unreasonably with views end privacy. A privacy fence is to be installed at the rear of the property and existing trees are to be retained and protected so that these mature trees will continue to screen and provide the view of mature landscaping. Policy 5, Design for maximum benefit of sun and wind The location of the house does not block the sun of any neighbors since additional setback is provided. The mature trees to be retained provide shade and wind block therefore the design maxini~es existing landscaping and does not interfere with the solar access of neighbors. Now, THEREFORE, the Planning Commiss n of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of t e site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the application by for Design Review approval is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A", New House- Lot41, Salem Saatchi, Doric Orchard, 13089 Quito Road, Saratoga prepared by Keith Roister, Architect, dated 2/10/03, date stamped 10/28/2004. The conditions of approval identified in this report shall be incorporated into the revised plans. 1. The design shall be revised to enhance the architectural detailing in the facade and reflect Craftsman style architecture. Exposed rafter beams at the eaves are required to meet the design review guidelines. The garage door should continue the Craftsman theme of the subdivision with multiple pane divided lights in the upper panel of the door. These details in the design of the house are required in order to enhance the character of the development. 2. Four sets of complete construction plans incorporating required revisions and this Resolution on a separate plan page shall be submitted to the Building Division. ++~ ~~~.~ 3. The landscape plan shall be installed prior to granting final planning approval of the project. 4. Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. 5. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hadscaped area. 6. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. 7. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. 8. Proper maintenance of landscaping, with minimal pesticide use, shall be the responsibility of the property owner. 9. The site plan shall be stamped and signed by a Licensed Land Surveyor who verifies the accuracy of the boundaries. 10. Prior to pouring of foundation, the setbacks identified in the approved plans shall be verified by a licensed land surveyor. This verification shall be documented by a signed and sealed statement from the Surveyor. This statement shall be submitted to the building inspector prior to pouring foundation. 11. The sound wall design shall be revised to provide a durable wall with solid wood facing along Quito Road. The wall at the property line shall not exceed 8 feet in height. 12. The plan data on sheet SP-1 shall be revised to correct the impervious coverage ratio. The impervious coverage is 22% as per the submitted data. 13. A six-foot high wooden privacy fence shall be installed along the northern property line, which abuts Lot 4. Fire Protection District The Santa Clara County Fire District reviewed this application on May 25, 2004 and their requirements are included as conditions of approval: ~~~~~ 1. Required Fire flow: the fire flow for this project is 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. The required fire flow is available from area water mains and fire hydrants(s), which are spaced at the required spacing. 2. Public Fire Hydrant Required: Provide 1 public fire hydrant at locations to be determined by the fire department and the San Jose Water Company. Hydrants shall have a minimum single flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual with spacing not to exceed 500 feet. Timing of required water supply installations: Installations of required fire service and fire hydrants shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested and accepted. 4. Garage Fire Sprinkler Required: An approved automatic fire sprinkler system designed per National Fire Protection Association Standard #13D and local ordinances, shall be provided for the garage. To ensure proper sprinkler operation, the garage shall have a smooth, flat, horizontal ceiling. 5. Fire Apparatus Access Roads Required: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface a minimum unobstructed width,of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning ra us of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15%. Installa ions shall conform to Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications. 6. Fire Department Engine Turn Around Required: Cu -de-sac diameters shall be no less than 72 feet. 7. Parking long roadways: The required width of fire access roadways shall not be obstructed in any manner and parking shall not be allowed along roadways less than 28 feet in width. Parking may be permitted along one side of roadways 28- 35 feet in width. For roadways equal to or greater than 36 feet, parking will be allowed on both sides of the roadway. City Arborist Report The City Arborist reviewed this project and prepared a report dated May 28, 2004. The recommendations of this report are included as conditions of approval. The proposed project on this lot would impact three trees of Ordinance size (#20, 21 and 35). They include one Coast Redwood (#20), one Modesto Ash (#21) and one California Black Walnut (#35). Each tree is planned for retention. Per City Ordinance, a bond equal to 100% of the appraised value of these trees, which is $2,515, is required to promote their protection. The three trees are situated on neighboring properties and were inventoried for this report, as their root zones are vulnerable to construction damage. C~ u ~~~~ The September 11, 2002 arborist report identifies 36 fruit trees of Ordinance size scattered throughout the property. Many are dead while the others appear in overall poor condition. For this reason, their removal is appropriate and mitigation is not suggested. 1. Tree protective fencing shall be installed prior to any demolition, grading, surface scraping, construction or heavy equipment arriving on site. It shall be comprised of five- to six-foot high chain link mounted on two-inch diameter, galvanized steel posts, driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 12 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. 2. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the fenced areas (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: grading, surface scraping, trenching, storage and dumping of materials (including soil fill), and equipmentWehicle operation and parking. 3. Protective fencing shall remain installed throughout the landscape installation phase. Small openings can be created at that time (i.e. only immediately before landscape construction begins) to only allow for foot traffic and wheelbarrow access. 4. The surveyed locations of tree trunks #21 and 35 must be shown on all future site, grading and drainage, and landscape plans submitted to the City. Upon being available, plans showing grading and drainage, irrigation, and underground utilities shall be reviewed by the City for tree impacts. 6. All underground utilities (i.e. water, gas, sewer, electrical) and drainage features (such as drain lines, swales and dissipaters) must be designed outside from beneath canopies of retained trees. 7. Supplemental water shall be supplied every two weeks to each retained tree during the months of April thru November. This should begin at the start of grading and continue through construction. A rate of 10 gallons per inch of trunk diameter is recommended to be applied using soaker hoses placed on the soil surface beneath the mid- to outer-canopies. 8. All underground pipes and irrigation lines planned for removal beneath the canopies of retained trees should remain buried and cut off at existing soil grade. 9. Irrigation trenches should be designed no closer than 10 times the trunk diameter of trees being retained. Where this is not feasible, the irrigation system must be a drip-type system placed on top of existing soil grade. ~~ L_~ • ~~`~®~.~ 10. Irrigation spray should reach no closer than three feet from a tree's trunk (including those of newly installed trees). All forms of irrigation for new trees must be of a drip-type system placed on the soil surface and not m a sleeve. 11. Lawn or other plant material requiring frequent watering must comprise no more than 20-percent of the area beneath a tree's canopy. All other plant material should be drought tolerant. 12. Mulch, stones or other landscape features must be placed no closer than one-foot from the trees' trunks. Bender board should not be installed and tilling of the soil should not occur within 10 times the diameter of the nearest trunk. 13. Herbicides should not be used beneath tree canopies. Where used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. 14. The pruning of trees must be performed under the supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. Information regarding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained by referring to the following website: http: //www. isa-arbor. com/arborists/arbsearch. html. CITY ATTORNEY 1. Applicant agrees to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. 2. Noncompliance with any of the conditions of this permit shall constitute a violation of the permit. Because it is impossible to estimate damages the City could incur due to the violation, liquidated damages of $250 shall be payable to this City per each day of the violation. Section 2. Construction must be commenced within 36 months or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15-90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. • PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 10`h day of November 2004 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express to sand conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until a eed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the Ciry Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date • ~u~®2~ • Attachment 2 • ~~ ~~2~. ~ . ;; .',' ,'e if ~ j ~ ~ r .._ :.•..:.. . I i is ~' :! ~ t , ... ~ .. s ~.'' r~Y" ~ y • ~'. ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ Yi ! t r 1i~ ` i'~ ~ ~~ e ~; \i ~ n. • i +, ` ,~ ,.: ~' -` • ~ ~ - ~ it 4 ~ ~ I ~ - . ~ ( , ` t' / ~' .~... .. .T... _~ ~ ! ~S `4~ t I T~ \ ,. -~~ -I 4 I ~~ ~~ I I ~ 1 I ~.R I FI *~ t ± .. .. ~.. ~. •~ , • f ~ ~ i r ~:• . / ~ ti., ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ z ~ I .~~ * .t .... I • '~ ~• ~~ ~~ ! ~ ~ f ~; `e I I ~ 1 ..~. ~ . .~..r __ _ .. _ .. _ _ . j. .., .:.. , •~ t.. ~~ -- L s ...... .,.... .- KEY PLAN :_:.,: *' __ .:.. ._ ., . - ~ . C •i X00022. • Attachment 3 • vv~~~~ i ARBOR RESOURCES Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care A TREE INVENTORY AND REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED NEW RESIDENCE AT 13089 QUITO ROAD -LOT 4 SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA OWNER'S NAME: SAGARCHI APPLICATION #: 04-131 APN #: 389-014-037 Submitted to: Community Development Departure t City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 Prepared by: David L. Babby, RCA Registered Consulting Arborist #399 Certified Arborist #WE-4001A May 28, 2004 P.O. Box 25295, San Mateo, California 94402 • Email: arborresources@earthlink.net Phone: 650.654.3351 • Fax: 650.654.3352 Licensed Contractor #796763 • • • ~'•".''fi'r ~ 1~+r i~'~ David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist May 28, 2004 . SUMMARY The proposed project on this lot would impact three trees of Ordinance size (#20, 21 and 35). They include one Coast Redwood (#20), one Modesto Ash (#21) and one California Black Walnut (#35). Of these, only tree #20 is shown on plans reviewed. Each tree is planned for retention. Measures presented in the `Recommendations' section of this report must be carefully followed and incorporated into construction plans. Per City Ordinance, a bond equal to 100% of the appraised value of these trees, which is $2.515, is required to promote their protection. INTRODUCTION The City of Saratoga Community Development Department has requested I review the potential tree impacts associated with constructing asingle-family residence on a vacant lot at 13089 Quito Road -Lot 4, Saratoga. This report presents my findings and recommendations. Information regarding each tree is presented within the table ttached to the City Arborist report dated September 11, 2002. Metal tags containing numbers corresponding to those presen ed within this report were found attached to each accessible tree trunk. Plans reviewed for this report include Sheets T-1, SP-0, SP-4 and A-4.4 (by Keith Royster Architects, dated 2/10/03) and Sheet L-5 (by Creative Horticulture, dated 04/04). The trees' locations, numbers and canopy perimeters are presented on an attached copy of Sheet SP-4 (Site Plan). ~ Trees #21 and 35 are not shown on plans reviewed. Their trunk locations have been added to the attached map and should not be construed as being surveyed. The three trees are situated on neighboring properties and were inventoried for this report as their root zones are vulnerable to construction damage. The September 11, 2002 arborist report identifies 36 fruit trees of Ordinance size scattered throughout the property. Many are dead while the others appear in overall poor condition. For this reason, their removal is appropriate and mitigation is not suggested. Please note I 'The appraised tree values shown on the attached Tree Inventory Table are calculated in accordance with the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9'h Edition, published by the International Society of Arboriculture, 2000. Sagarchi Property, 13089 Quito Road -Lot 4, Saratoga Page 1 of .~ City of Saratoga Community Development Department ~~~~~~ David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist May 28, 2004 am unable to fully determine how many of these trees would be removed from this-lot due to their high number as well as the lot boundaries not being seen. RECOMMENDATIONS The below recommendations are intended to be used in conjunction with those presented in the September 11, 2002 report. 1. Tree protective fencing shall be installed precisely as shown on the attached map and established prior to any demolition, grading, surface scraping, construction or heavy equipment arriving on site. It shall be comprised of five- to six-foot high chain link mounted on two-inch diameter, galvanized steel posts, driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 12 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. 2. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the fenced areas (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: grading, surface scraping, trenching, storage and dumping of materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 3. I recommend protective fencing remain installed throughout the landscape installation phase. Small openings can be created at that time (i.e. only immediately before landscape construction begins) to only allow for foot traffic and wheelbarrow access. 4. The surveyed locations of tree trunks #21 and 35 must be shown on all future site, grading and drainage, and landscape plans submitted to the City. 5. Upon being available, plans showing grading and drainage, irrigation, and underground utilities shall be reviewed by the City for tree impacts. 6. All underground utilities (i.e. water, gas, sewer, electrical) and drainage features (such as drain lines, swales and dissipaters) must be designed outside from beneath canopies of retained trees. 7. Supplemental water shall be supplied every two weeks to each retained tree during the months of April thru November. This should begin at the start of grading and continue through construction. I recommend a rate of 10 gallons per inch of trunk diameter applied using soaker hoses placed on the soil surface beneath the mid- to outer- canopies. 8. All underground pipes and irrigation lines planned for removal beneath the canopies of retained trees should remain buried and cut off at existing soil grade. • Sagarchi Property, 13089 Quito Road -Lot 4, Saratoga City of Saratoga Community Development Department Page 2 of 3 ~+~~02~ David L. Bobby, Registered Consulting Arborist May 28, 2004 9. Irrigation trenches should be designed no closer than 10 times the trunk diameter of trees being retained. Where this is not feasible, the irrigation system must be adrip- type system placed on top of existing soil grade. 10. Irrigation spray should reach no closer than three feet from a tree's trunk (including those of newly installed trees). All forms of irrigation for new trees must be of adrip- type system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. • 11. Lawn or other plant material requiring frequent watering must comprise no more than 20-percent of the area beneath a tree's canopy. All other plant material should be drought tolerant. 12. Mulch, stones or other landscape features must be placed no closer than one-foot from the trees' trunks. Bender board should not be installed and tilling of the soil should not occur within 10 times the diameter of the nearest trunk. 13. Herbicides should not be used beneath tree canopies. Where used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. 14. The pruning of trees must be performed under the supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. Information regarding Certified Arborists in the area can i obtained by referring to the following website: http: //www. isa-arbor. com/arborists/arb~earch. html. Attachment: Site Map (Copy of Sheet SP-4) Sagarchi Property, 13089 Quito Road -Lot 4, Saratoga City of Saratoga Community Development Department Page 3 of 3 ~~~~~~ t, :;., r fiCICH C O U R T _.; ~..~ , i 6~.Sq' ~ ' -----~ o I I i ~,'~ I b ~ / I / ~ I w / I r--- ~ / I 1 II / I I I ~ ~ I ~ l ~ ~ ,,.~ I j I ~ ~ ~ I ~ i~ ~I _ I / 4~ ,~~~ I ~~ IN ,' I ~~ - °~^ ~~ ~~ I ,,' I z I ~" a c ~~ I< ~~~ a I • i ~ ~~~/ I ~ p"A' ~~ b 0 I~ -,~c I ~~~ y ~. I n - ~~ .A I n I !. I ~ I I - s J~ ~' I ~ I I I I - I I I I I I I °~ I j I - I i I ~ I ~ I I - - - - - - - - - - - - J ~ ~ y ~~ _~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ,- ~ ~ ~~~ ~ I. ~ c~ ,' ~~•.. _,_,1 _._~ _,_._, _ 105_6'1_ _._.-.=.-~..1 -._._ ~. -.-.- ~ C -----~ `~ N ~ ; L,.a •, `l - P ~ • Attachment 4 ~~~~. c~,nxa e ~ • Pu• EwNUAASER 04 1083 ~,~e• oG FIRE DEPARTMENT ~ ~a~ SANTA CLARA COUNTY BLDGPERMRNUMSER 14700 Winchester Blvd., Los Gatos, CA 95032-1818 (408) 378-4010 • (408) 378-9342 (fax) • wu,w.sccfd.org CONTROLNIJMSER `°'""'"'"""" 04-131 FN.E NUMBER DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS CODE/SEC. I SHEET I NO.I REpU1REMENT UpFC II-A~~ SP-0 Review of a proposed 3,402 square foot single family residence with an attached garage. This review covers Lot #4. Review of this Developmental proposal is limited to acceptability of site access and water supply as they pertain to fire department operations, and shall not be construed as a substitute for formal plan review to determine compliance with adopted model codes. Prior to performing any work the applicant shall make application to, and receive from, the Building Department all applicable construction permits. iZ It is noted that the Site Plan does not appear to match the scale shown. It is noted that the proposed new street will be identified as Dorcich Court. Please reflect that street name on all future applications. ~ Fire Flow: The fire flow for this project is 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual . The required fire flow is available from area water mains and fire s) which are spaced at the required spacing. STG ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ KEITH ROYSTER ARCHITECTS 5/25/2004 1 of 3 SECJFLOOR AREA LOAD DESCRIPTION BY LOT 4 I Residential Construction Hokanson, Wayne SFR- SARGACHI 13089 Quito Rd Organized as the Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District ~,n.,~~~~ v Serving Santa Clara County and the communities of Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, and Saratoga • • - ~~P CL~9 pOG ~~ ~ FI "` cou~esr a ~av~ce SIRE EPARTMENT SANTA CLARA COUNTY 14700 Winchester Blvd., Los Gatos, CA 95032-1818 (408) 378-4010 • (408) 378-9342 (fax) • www.sccfd.org Pu• EW NUMBER 04 1083 BLDfi PERMR NUMBER coNTROLNUMBER FILE NUMBER 04-131 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS CODEIBEC. ~ SHEET ~ NO. ~ REpUIREMENT Z1Fc 903.2 tic 901.3 SMC 16-15.070 • Public Fire Hydrant(s) Required: Provide 1 public fire hydrant(s) at location(s) to be determined by the Fire Department and the San Jose Water Company. Hydrant(s) shall have a minimum single flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual, with spacing not to exceed 500 feet. Prior to applying for building permit, provide civil drawings reflecting all fire hydrants serving the site. To prevent building permit delays, the developer shall pay all required fees to the water company ASAP. Timin¢ oo f Required Water Supply Installations: Installations of required fire service(s) and fire hydrant(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department, prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested, and accepted. Garage Fire Sprinkler System Required: An approved, automatic fire sprinkler system designed per National Fire Protection Association Standard #13D and local ordinances, shall be provided for the garage. To ensure proper sprinkler operation, the garage shall have a smooth, flat, horizontal ceiling. A State of California licensed fire protection contractor shall submit three (3) sets of plans, calculations, a completed permit application and appropriate fees to this department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. trFC 902.2.2 Fire A~varatus (Eneine) Access Roads Required: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface, a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating fuming radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15%. Installations shall conform with Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications sheet A-1. CNy PLANS SPECS NEW RMDL AB OCCUPANCY CONST.TYPE App11aMN~ DATE PAOE STG ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ KEITH ROYSTER ARCHITECTS 5/25/2004 2 OF 3 SECJFLOOR AREA LOAD DESCRIPTION BY Residential Construction Hokanson, Wayne l~E OF PROJECT L°c~n°n SFR- SARGACHI 13089 Quito Rd Organized as the Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District Serving Santo Clara County and the communities of Campbell, Cupertino, Los Alters, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Serena, Morgan Hill, and Saratoga ~', '''~~i~~, • , FIRE DEPARTMENT SANTA CLARA COUNTY 14700 Winchester Blvd., Los Gatos, CA 95032-1818 (408) 378-4010 • (408) 378-9342 (fax) • unvw.sccfd.org PLAN•IEW NUMBER 04 ~ 0~3 BLDO PERMR NUMBER CONTROL NUMBER FILE NUMBER 04-131 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS CODE/SEC. LTFC 902.2.2.4 uFc 902.2.4.1 uFC 901.4.2 uFC 901.3 trFc 901.4.4 SHEET ~ NO. ~ REOUIREMEHr 9 Fire Department (Engine) Roadway Turn-around Required: Provide an approved fire department engine roadway turnaround with a minimum radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside. Installations shall conform with Fire Department Standard Details and Specification sheet A-1. Cul-De-Sac Diameters shall be no less than 72 feet. Note the fire lane marking requirement in item #11 below specific to the cul de sac bulb. to parkin¢.~long adwavs: The required width of fire access roadways shall not be obstructed in any manner and, parking shall not be allowed along roadways less than 28 feet in width. Parking may be permitted along one side of roadways 28-35 feet in width. For roadways equal to or greater than 36 feet, parking will be allowed on both sides of the roadway. Roadway widths shall be measured curb face to curb face, with parking space based on an 8 ft width. X11 Fire Lane Marking Required: Provide marking for all roadways within the project. Markings shall be per fire department spe' ifications. Installations shall also conform to Local Government Standards and' ire Department Standard Details and Specifications A-6. 12 Timin o~cluired Roadway Installations: Req fired access roads, up through first lift of asphalt, shall be installed and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of construction. Bulk combustible materials shall not be delivered to the site until installation is complete. During construction, emergency access roads shall be maintained clear and unimpeded. Note that building permit issuance may be withheld until installations are completed. 13 Premises Identification: Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall contrast with their City PLANS SPECS NEW RMDL AS OCCUPANCY CONST. TYPE AppilcsMWrtN DATE PAGE STG ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ KEITH ROYSTER ARCHITECTS 5/25/2004 3 OP 3 SECJFLOOR AREA LOAD DESCRIPTION BY LOT 4 Residential Construction Hokanson, Wayne NAME OF PROJECT LOCATION SFR- SARGACHI 13089 Quito Rd • • Organized as the Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District ,,,,-,,,R, A„ Serving Santa Clara County and the communities of Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos, ~ ~ ~ ~~~ Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, and Saratoga • Attachment 5 • ~~~~~ AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES . STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) I, r" ,being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the o~ ~ day of ~.~1'~~ 2004, that I deposited in the United States Post Office within Santa Clara County, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to-wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) 'd ro who are en tled to a Notice of Hea ' that said persons are the owners of sai p perry ~g pursuant to Section 15-45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property to be affected by the application; that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. /~ Signed • ~~~~~ • NOTICE OF HEARING BEFORE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF SARATOGA'S PLANNING COMMISSION announces the following public hearing on Wednesday, the 10th day of November at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, which are located in the Civic Theater at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Project details and plans are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Thursday, 7:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. If you have questions, on the project please direct them to Ann Welsh, Associate Planner, awelsh@saratoga.ca.us or 408-868-1230. All interested persons may appear and be heanl at the above time and place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a public hearing in court, you maybe ]united to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Saratoga Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. In order to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed on or before the Tuesday, a week before the meeting. APPLICATIONS #04-128,129,130,131 & 132 (389-14-37) SAGARCHI,13089 Quito Road - The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct five single family homes on the site of the former Dorcich Orchard which was approved for a six lot subdivision on 11/12/03. The proposed homes are designed to be compatible with the style of the historic farmhouse, which is being moved and restored on Lot 5. The homes are two story structures with a maximum height of 25 feet 6 inches. The floor area of the homes range in size from 3,366 square feet to 3,517 square feet. The property is in the R-1, 10,000 zoning district. The landscaping and Quito Road sound wall are also the subject of review. ~G ~Ci'~~ tt~ co 1~ O 0 O ~- N M d to c0 -~ ao 0 O M cO f~ 00 0 O r N M d~ c0 d 1n c0 1~ ao 0 O r M M M M M~ d d d d d d d d~~ 0 0 0 0 0 r r- r r r r r N N N N N N M M c 0o c O~ M M «~ M M M M M « ~ M c O~ c ~ M M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Od ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d0 ' ~ ~ d0 ' d ' ~ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r Z 0000000)00000000)OOOOO~OOGIOOOOOOOOQ100010~ Q M M M M M M M M M M M M M coo M M M M M~ M M M M c~ i~ M M M c0~ M M M M M M 000 N r f~ 000000000 ~ O~MOtnO~000~p~ptDNONNNNNNNNNN r r r r r r r r r r r r f~ 0 ~O (O t0 t0 (O r ~p ~O t0 ~ O t0 ~D t0 1~ t0 t0 t0 ~O ~O c0 t0 O V, O O O O O O O O d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O d 0 0 0 0 C O O oo''o''oosaooooo00 00 ~~~ooor~o~Cr~-~o~tioti IVrnrno~ia~io~ic~irno~io~io~i0~io~irno~irnrn rnrn ~~`~Ornrn~iO`~io`~i~`~O~o~ia`~i~rn`~0 d ~ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q t] Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q v~UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUtnUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU QQaQQQQOQQQQQ~aQ~Qa QQQQQcnQQQQaQQaQa c~c~c~c~c~c~c~?c~c~c~c~c~oc~c~QC~c~ c~c~c~c~c~oc~c~c~c~c~c~c~c~c~c~ 0000000~00000~00~00000000~0000000000 ~~~~~~~~~--~~-~QI-t-XF-1-zi-t-l-t-1-QI-H H-1-1-1-1-1-HI- ~~~~~~~a~~~~~~~~o~~W~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~'aQQaQQQ~QQQQaoQQ_Qa~QQQQ oQQQQQaQQaQ UNf~fntnfnNfl~U(nfn(nfnUJfnfnU)lAfnLLfnfAlnf~ J(nfgf~fn(nfAfAfnfnf~ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 000000 LL W 000030000000000 O Z Z Z Z O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z gg°°ggg~~JaaaaaJaa a>Q~Qggggz~gg5gg~g~g ZZZZZZ}zz~,zzoz~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ w w w w w w~ w 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0~ 0 0 W O LL LL LL LL~ LL~ ~~i. ~~~ tQi. uQ,. LL ~Qi. cncntncncncn- W ~i1~ilwwwXww~~u~uww000UaUUUUUUUUUU QQQQQQ~~ ~naaaaaaC~c~ooooo ooNoo o~~~~Q~~~~~~~~~~ NNt00 OONtC1MM0drf~pO~OdGOwtDrrlAMU1ArC0 OON 00 ~ r 0 O~ ~{ M O O M <G Gp 0 N d X N r 0 ~O GO 0 r to <D I~ N r G) ~ csOt ~ ~0 to In In In ~ O I~ ~ ~ In to ~ 00 cO cC O ~ 000 ~ oOD oM0 GOO oM0 COO 00 ao 000 000 COO CO 000 COO 0~0 C~D C~0 '0 O GO O O 00 O M O O O O GO 00 O O 00 Q r r r r r r r N r r r r r In r r m r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r m W Z W Y ~ J J Q' Z J ~ 2WS UQ~ J ~ F-'}.W?~WU mots 2 ~ Z~~ Z ~ Q W m Q W S W tY Q~} ~ Q W m N O _W ~ W Q ~ VQS Qot3~ F'Q0~ J wQ~2m~~ 2~ Q~ w ~ HQ°~QW ~~C9 g~m~Jaia~am~~ m2 Q~ Q ~ --t- ~ wJ Opoty~~~~Vo~Jp2otsa Y ~U 2 mJZwJ~QW W ~ WQQ~U~~Q~ W~o~,'Q JwW~ ~ U at7 otf J U' -F-QQSV- JI"'Jp' aQJ~ ln~f"~ f- ~W~tYZtY~2 WO~o~UJJtY ~}QZQ~~l1 ~wWQUQg awp~UQ~amwVOg~wJ~3Q=~Z>ZO~w~ QSmaz QOOz- m ~~-W Q Z O~QD m2 -01-0 W~ YZZ> W~=JO°~~~S~YSQ?p~p V~ JQN =OU Qw~JOQ~ Q WQ~~Jp~ WQQZH'~F-2 QZU 2(A~p~ W yQQZw~U20~Z?Ztn~Omwc~Jp~'ZUU~pWtYZO J~Z2w0 c~uwWJO~OOQO2Q>~~~Qww0~0~}~QOZmWQJOOQW 2 ZYmU~mU' ~~C~UW WOU' WJLLU' lY}ZmJmm3W WJ~~2mH~~ ~~'~~~, • oo"~oooooo~oo~~ooooooo~'ooooo`~o`~`~ooooogg~ vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvavv~rvvvaoao 0 0 0 O O 0 O O O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 MMMMMM c~MMMMC'AMC")MMCO~McO~MMC~c)MMCO~eO~cO~M~O'9~cO~MMe~MC~ 00 0 ~ N r N~~NN ~ hO'~tt7'~i~ OtC)~tntAlnO LntAI~f~1~ON00O00~00000000 O r d ~- ~- ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ CA e r r L[~ r r N~ N p N ~- ~ ~ IA ~- ~ O ~ ~ ~- 00tO~f~ I~ t00MtDCCtOtCt000 <D~O ~O h~D~01~0f~S~~G~C~ON~O~ON~C~00 ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~M~~M~~~4~~~~~~ Qp~ QO QpO ~ QO QpO O ~ QpO O QpO O O O O O O ~ pO ~ p~ pN O Qp~ p~ QO O ~ ~ Q~ Q~ ~QO QO Q~ QN In lA Lf~ l~ lC~ 1n L~ LO lC~ IOC 1l~ t~ l~ l~ l~ lOA L~ ll~ lA lOA ll) tf~ IOC lf~ In In IOC lOA ~ l(~ t[7 1n lC~ 1A 1n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aaQQQaQQQaQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQaQaQaQQQ UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU w w J QQQQQ~QQgQQQQQQ QQQoQQa QQQQaQ QQWQQQ oc~oc~ C7c~ c~c~c~c~c~c~wc~C7c~?c~c~C~ o,c~c~c~oc~zc~o~oc~c~ ~ooooooo~oooooooooo~ooooopooooooo~ooo ~~~~~Q~~Q~~~~~~Q~~~?~~~~~ ~~~~F~~o~~~ cncnv~cncn3cncncncncncncnu~cncncnv~cnUcnv~v~c~v~ k cncnv~cn~v~cn~cncncn ~- U Q W > ~ ~ > Z Q > > > > > > Q > > > ~ > > > > ~ > > > > > ~ > > > »oo QJ QQQQQQQQQQOaQOQOQOQQQ QQQaQa aQ~~~Q~3000QQQC~QQQ~Qa~o~~.Q}~} }}_~>~- ~zz ~=wc~======o===W==O~OOoooo~ooUooo a>>0>O00}~.azF-~-~~-~~-~~~~-YHF-F-QI-U-UUU~UU~UUU U W W>> W Q~ J Q Q Q Q Q Q~ Q Q Q~ Q Q~ 0~ U W U U U X U U U U U ~ ~ O C1 d ~ -~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ Gr~pp- O M M ~j p•-p O LL 0 O ~~ O O~ GO N_ c0 0 c0 N O= M 0 ~ 1~~~pp ~ t~ m 0~ f~ N _O OC to ~ O ~ m lA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (ND V0 ~ 000 ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ N to ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ tN0 ~O ~ O00DOMM~00~ M0000000000000000000~ 000DMOMODO0000OD 0000f~00O00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~O ~ ~ N r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~- ~ N ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ r a r ~ ~ r r r v ~ w Q W W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1- J F-H W ~ZW JJW~ fA Q W~~ J d' JJ ~ ZO H W ~ W '~ ?Z w»o_Y~= ~~zQ°~~~g Z wi~zpQw zg ~J J Q W Q~ w~ J C9 Q p Z~ U W~ 2 W= Z~ H U m Q W S O«s ~Q~ooQaw ~~Q~~~nQ. Ow~?O~~s~rs~ JQwO Q~ ~~}ot3~(nots~ J «s~~~~ ~~~}~'~'~ JSW a~JU ~sW ~ o aQ~sw ~z}~~s USUoiS~~LL1otSY0Q~tn°~z F-WQC9NCn~>zoQw~Wa~~~3-~ wwW~~°W°t=a~ww~rs jz~ O 2Z-W ~ ~.JfnWLQi.pQwwJ=~JWHOfnO WOQ}Z~Q~ ~a0»~z ~QQwz ~~>zwa-~ w ~Q w= Q ?~w~>-off=.~Q3~~w~a~mzQ>-~=aa~~o J~~~~Qgo~~ ~~ Vr ~O (/1w_~~~~"7 Z=- W =_~!/~QYZ~~JJLL~~Q~ ~O Q z Q a=~~ C~ = W Y Z~~~~ Y _U ~= cn ~ U Q O w J Q z N~ O O p ~z= ~OVw ?c~OpWOWwWwO~~Q~WQ=~~Of-QZdQ~cn_NZ~ W O~ g Q~ S Q W U' W~}~~ w 0~> Q V~ Q~~ W~ Z~ O Q O =~ Y~~ N WQWJ20Q I-QZ~QQW QQJ U LLWQWOOS~WW~2W2QN J t L 2 Q U ~ m ~i ~ Y O c !) m J>~ S a Q~~ Y~= 2 J Y~ 0 U t A[ ~ a d U LL~ <.r'v ~' ~ a5- • ~A ~O to tD I~ oD rn O r N M ~ O CO I~ G0 ~ M ~0 1~ pp O) O .- cO P 0~ 0 Q .- N M ~ 1A tC 1~ OD ~-r-~~~ NNNNNNNNN 1AOLnl~tnfD~00000DOD0~++p~Q~O1~~r~~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O pp pp O O pp 00 OC I~ 1~ 1~ 1~ f~ I~ I~ 1~ f~ I~ I~ I~ 1~ f~ I~ f~ f~ 1~ 1~ f~ P I~ 1~ I~ 1~ I~ f~ 1~ I~ I~ 00 CC CO GO 00 ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 01 O M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ~MV°vva°v°OV°v°°vv°v°°vv°°~~°~~°°v°v~°°°v°~°vv°°vv°a°v°°~°vv°a°g°vg~ ti N ~ O ~ r M .- ~A 0~ O ~ O O M f~ .- 1~ pp 1~ f~ I~ ~ 1~ c0 ~ ~C ~ ~ CO O O ~ ~ ~ O O O O O Of •- ~ O ~ M N O O O O M ~- N ~ O ~ ~ ~- 01 r' r' I~ ~ O O O O O O O O N N M M N O N N O N tC f~ 1~ f~ I~ f~ I~ to 1~ O f~ 1~ t~ f~ I~ I~ f~ P f~ I~ I~ 1~ ~ 1~ I~ f~ I~ 1~ I~ GO 1~ ~~~ ~~~~~~4~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~ 0o OOOOO~occc° oo~~ °~°o^od~~~~~~~o~ ~~~ ~~~~ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaQaaaaaaaaaaQaaaaaaaaaaa UUUUUUUUU~~~~U~U~U~U~U~UU~U~U~~UU~~~~ U Z _~ QQQVQQQQ aaaaa QQ a ~aaaaaaaaaaaaaawa c~c~c~zc~c~c~c~3c~c~c~c~c~wc~c~wc~~zc~t~c~c~c~c~c~c~c~c~ c~ c~~c~ ooo~oooo~ooooo~oo~oQQOOOOOOOOOO~o~o~o ~~~,~~~~~~~~~~~z~a~z~z,~~~~aaa~~a~~~a~~a~~a~z~ ~~~Z~~~~Z OJQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ~Q QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ cncnu~cnv~~ncnv~cncncncnv~cncncncncncn~acnv~cncnv~cnv~v~v~cnv~cnv~v~cncn u ~ O ~ 0 ~ ~ D O ~ ~ W Q W W W W W W W W O ~ D ~ D Q 0 ~ O () > >> O O> O O O O O O O Z Q Q Q Q Q Q} J_ J J J J J_ J_ J_ OpQ QQO~~~>~~~~~~ ~NVZZZZZZ3mmmm~mm m Jam} }}~=~2Y===~-__ =w OOOOOOw~~~~-~~~~ J F- F- Q F- H F- to H F- H O Z ~pOH000~W~0~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~ZOOOOZOO~o U~c~mUU~acnQOQaac~aavQe~mwwwwwwZZZZZZ~~.77~~~ z z U~ U w U U~ 3 Z~ J 3 3 3~~ 3 O~ x~ J J J J J J 0 0 0 Q Q O Q Q O Q ~ V' ~O~~V' f/)wUOfnfAfnlL~NXNODUUUUUUd'»»pcmpp»~ 1A p p~ a tip ~ cMp GNi cp cOD '~ ~ M N Z~ 00 m O m O cOrl N O O N c~7 M N ~ O O~ a~ O N m OsOt ~ ~t ~ M ~ ~ ~O M M st f~ ~ ~~{{ e~ rNicNO tMG p~pMap~~MC0~a0 ~ COCOOapOOCOGO~~~~M~~ ~oMO~~CCO W W 2 W Q W W W } m W ~ ~ ~ W O Z ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ J F- ~ ~~ ~ WZ J U°~W~~ clla'Q fn w. o -~ ~LLw~ Qw~o ~ z3~wv~~ ~~~ ~z ~ w ~ zw~'w --mm w~Wq~om~~Q ~ d' E-W =araiS N w~Q~ ('Q'~J..~ W ~JLLQ°8~~ J Q W°6 QS ~ ~~ ~JotS~ wF-~mQZQ Ocn~-'WOF-,oa,aJ z~~ W= ~ a o~- ~ ~a ~z a4 w aQ ~cn v~~o~ =~aoa oQZw} z~w Jz wF- maU ~~~-wpa }O~J ~ww J ~~~_ ~ ~ c~ ~~ ~a Q Ja QZ imp J JQQU} HO WQWUWmt~=Q ~~~=Ca LL_ ~LLZZ_Q~m~QQOW=maQ~ LLLL=23ozm~wvo}w>}~O~ a~~O~a Yz>_>zv~QC~a o~JzUZW>OGQOQ~?aC9ZQ~=a =Va~m~~ZO a ~maz=~C9wj~amc9~ -,pJLL a-~0~~ ~Zazw~~ao~~~w cn O = ~-z z}LLN >a Q WOwaOwa~Yww~~_n-j ~?>wczi~2wQww=03~wwao-wH3 >~ J~Q'~=LL-ZUa> OLL.JJ W Z Q' Jm~~~ J W J Z °~~a=~pOO~~OV~~~wa°~Ji~ap~NaiQ?~i~aaaa C7 = C7 cn ~ m ~ = a m = ~ a m m c~ ~ a ~ C7 ~ Y C~ cn tL ~ ~ U w J cn a > > cn -- cn • L' • O O ~ N ~A ~D I~ CO O~ O N ~NNNNNNNNehtn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 OD OD 00 OO 00 00 00 00 f~ M M M~ M M M M M M M ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r N O ~ er r r- I~ M '~ M M M M O f~ N N~ ~~ ~ ~ r ~~ O O O O O O 1A f~ 1~ 1~ 1~ f~ 1~ f~ f~ U U U U U U U U U U U Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q LL1C7C~C~C9 C9 t9C~C~w X0000 0000 Oi-HHHZI-I-HHO Z~~~~~~~~~Z QQQQQ}QQQQQ v~v~cncnv~mv~v~v~tncn O ~ Z r~ O ~~pw~wwww~ ~wwcn~a»»g ~00~030000 ~zzw~o~~~~a xjjUa?aaaa= OO~~CO~~N000~ m ~pOp01~DO~MNON Oo`~~~~rn~a~a~oo`orn a~~~~.-~.-.-.-r w v ~ Q ~ ~ Q Q Q H ~ w W a ~ ~~ a ~ ~ w w Q ~ow0 Q Z~ f--C7~ ~ J ~ U 2 ot3 otf N C9 °~ w Q -~ J ~ Z }~Op i~s~~j U ~~fwOJ~w~'~z J f~ ~~ O p Q Z= Z W Ju+wJfnW-fn3Q~ j?WaWLL.Q~~-'U' ~Q~Q~IQ--QZ>>a=O Q~3c~2~u.QWU>- ~~~ ~~~~ • Attachment 6 • • ~'~ ~~~~~ Salim Sagarchi SEI Corporation 14524 Oak Street Saratoga, CA 95070 October 4, 2004 Ms. Ann Welsh Assistant Planner, AICP City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 Dear Ann, Regarding the neighborhood meeting requested by the Planning Commission, we would like to inform you that after a couple of attempts, we were able to meet with the neighbors to review the final construction plans on May 8, 2004. many attempts were made to contact the neighbors via phone and fliers. With the exception of two, all other immediate neighbors were present at the meeting. During this meeting the construction plans were presented to the neighbors and the elevation and design details were reviewed. All who were present approved these plans unanimously and signed the "Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application" which was submitted to you already. They were also anxious for us to start and finish this project ASAP, as the finished project would add value to the neighborhood. There were several attempts made to meet with one of the two immediate neighbors that were not present at the meeting. Several phone calls, personal meetings requests at his house, invitation to the neighborhood meetings, and visits to his residence have failed to get him to review our plans. These plans were changed due to his personal requests during the planning commission meeting and afterwards. He refused to show up in 4 pre- agreed meeting dates, never returned more than 10 voicemails, and refused to attend the last two meetings. Best Regards, Salim Sagarchi ~~~~~~~ Open House Invitation ~ Sunday, May 6, 2004 I30St: SEI Enterprise LOCat10n: Dorcich Orchazd, 13089 Quito Road, in Saratoga Time: Thursday Mat 6, from 5:00 to 7:00 pm. Please come and review our development plans. Meet the developers, ask them questions, check out the detailed plans and give them your feedback. • ~~~~'~~ ~J • Neigbbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Quito Road, Saratoga, CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta,~"and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the Ci of Saratoga My signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; I nderstand the scope of work; and I do NOT have any coace ns or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, Lave not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Name: Neighbor Address: ~-~c~aXr".,jl% G~f~~~ Neighbor Phone #: `~ 0 $~- 37 9- ~' yob Signature: Printed: ~~~ -~~ ('itv nf,4nrntnvn Plannino l~e»artment Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: ____ _13089 Quito Road, Saratoga. CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hewing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Stajj''and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may rese a the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City aratoga My signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any eoncer or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. I ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Name: ~ i~ `~ ~ h ~ ~. & ~o ' Yw•~t L~ Neighbor Address: t ~o ~3 ~~.,~f. Rd. s a 1'0.'~'o qa, C/~ `~ Sb 7 a Neighbor Phone #: ~ 08~ 3 7a ' • Printed: i h. ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~''~''~'a~4~ Plnnninv nenartment ~ (.'itv nf,Sarntnva Neigbbor Notification Template for . Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Ouito Road. Saratoga. CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues a»d concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta,,~''and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative ofall residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the ,C~~it//y of Saratoga. l~My signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any conce or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):, • f ~^ Neighbor Phone #: ~.t~(r ~ J .~ ~o~e rf f3 /b C`( ~~ ~~~~~~ ('itv nt,Siirntnva PlnnninQ ne»nrtment Neighbor Address: ~ 7A~ l Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Quito Road. Saratoga. CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Soratoga Planni»g Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorobly upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Stajj"and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signatro~e on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, ynu may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any conce ns or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public 'ng on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: i have reviewe the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):, ~ ,J. ;~ C Neighbor Name: ~~ ~--~t~+r ~1, lJ~v1.1 Jt~~''~S Neighbor Address: ~ $ s~o M~ ~.~<<.~ ~ A-~- Signature: . r n rntnva Neighbor Phone #: ~D~ - ~{-~d ' ~ 0(e / Printed: • r- Plnnninv I)ennrtment • Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Ouito Road. Saratoga, CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applicatio»s prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Stajj''and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City f Saratoga signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; I understand the scope of work and I do NOT have any conce ns or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Name: Neighbor Address: l ~_5~/O~~~y ~ /~~ T~C~I~~~ Signature: ~ ~ `- Neighbor Phone #: ~~0 ~/ / /-'~ Printed: ~t~~J (/~z9dEZ ('itv n{~4nrntnva PlnnninQ l~ennrtment Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: ~ 2 y- 0~ PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Ouito Road. Saratoga. CA Applicant Name: SE1 Enterprise Application Number. The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues whe» solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta,~''and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, yov may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City o Saratoga y signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; ~ understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, whicb after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):, Neighbor Name: ~~,~1 ~ (;1 ~' ~ C ~~~ r ~'~1. Neighbor Address: ~ ~ ~~ ~m.~ ~~~~ h~~ c~ ~~ ~' ~. ' l ` ~ S ~~ v Neighbor Phone #: ~ 7 0 - ~J ~~ Signature:. Printed: L'j V~~ ~, (.'itv n!',Snrntnva Plnnnino nennrtmP~n~~~~~ x.~ ~r.f~•IrL•ol>. I • 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ •I r L •o I s L£~~+10-68E iNd~ ~b~J~y``~~J~~Oyl~~d~ly~HyS~ _ O 1 i - r 'r 7 '~I 11 r' M i N ~~ Ol~ ~dH~ 1'h/IVRJV ~ ~ r, `f~ T 'iNY N01111io011 IVIf ~ n V 1 1/ 11 1 1{ Jl O it N l l i !1 iH~ds vrrr~s ~ ~ ~ E! ~ S1031JHO~lb ~# 101 ~Sf10H MAN f' ~~~ ~3LSJl0~ H.U~~I Z ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ p~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~ F -- F ~ - - ~B~e ~~~ ~ ~~ a~ ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~ F~~ ~ ~o ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~, ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ Y ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~Fg~ ~ O ~H o~~ ~.~~ ~° ~ ~~~~ 3~ ~ Z F~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~F ~ ~ ~3F ~ J a ~ ~ F ~~~ ~ ~ >~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ F • ~~ ~~ ~ ~ W W~ ~~~a~~ ~ ~. a ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o~ - W ~ ~ ~ ~~_~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ _ ti u ~ •f r ri o r ~ ~:JU U u ~ U O Q ~ U O ~J U J ~ o~ ~ Q ~ 0 F ~ a ~ ~~ ~ } ~ F- ~w~ ~j~ ~o$ ~ ~ ~ t~~ uF~ x: U ~ ~~ ~ ~~ yy ~ ~~ iGw 0 _ X ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ F W ~ a ~~ ~~ Z ~ ~~ 5 ~~~~~~ Z ~ 999 rjj ~ ~~ ~a ~~~~~~ W nl 4- _n ~vV P~~ll~~~ jj~ • II• -. ~~~~~ ~~~~~. ~~~~~ F F F F F eeeae ~g~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ gg~°~~ w - 3g ~ W - ~~~~ ~} ««< O 9 U ~ ~ voo~~ m>u+ ~- a ~ . } ~ s Z ~ a U; ~Y .~.Y~ 5 ~ ~ ~ Z U '" ~~~ (-'- S ~`~/~ -~ r-- ~ ~a s 4 ~!~ ~ a J ~ }} ~` ~1 ~ >. 1'~) (~ J tp ~Qa u' i O ~ U N ZYO ~ ~JO p m ~ n ~~Qnv Q'Om~ .. ~~vwirn a r m 0 w 0 5 0 a 0 a 0 11,119 sq.ft. f '~' ::~r ~„ .to.t3 ~-- `s Lc ~. \ ~ ~ ,i ~~ ~, g ~ `~.---~ ---~ t N i-- ~ ~' _ n cY` M ~ --- ro ~ ~ "~ < ,IJl` ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ o~ i ~ ~ / z 1 .u 1 ~ ~f ~~J "' ~ 'o ~4j ~~ / N 3 m ~_/ ff I a »t < - a ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ t::~ .a[ ~ i ~ ~. ~r C7 ~ ' i < n ^ ~ ~; a ~~ m ~~ {~ y ~ ~~. t b .Zl 531WA / ~ ~,--._~ \ \ U= k' ~ G7 .os ~ _ . ~l Bf [ (llV130 3 N~INEfR,~c~~ { `O ~ \ f .c J I y ~ o~~ .a W ~ hM ~ U p '\ ~`~ O o, ~ h/, O~Vr3 j ~~~15 19 3~ ~S i ~ __-.,/ 't ,l ,f + ~~:: s `.. .Y __~.. ~ { . ,. ;' i~a~~ M ~~- _ , I ---- - clII j ~t~nJf1aJ Zp~ ~~ I i NII1N ~ YH ~~ I G=\ < a' 1 z~ t o$ ~ W ~ ~ ~ p G: N O 4 T # y~ ~ r'~ (y 1 ss L 5 j N UV<~ W O _~ ___.._. ~. < ~ v 2 0 ~~iw~ I __ V ~ ~ i' ~ ~ y~<k' '~~a~ '_ ,.. ~ ~ __ ~ C$ ~ v; z ~ <~ ~ a ..~ J ~ aW J _ ~ N~~Y . -- ~~~ _ 5~ ~ _'; ~ i o °) ~ _.._._ ': _, ._ sL: ____ o .a /~ ~~ /~ '~ _ ~ f~~"1~ ~ 1 ~ ~`, 1 ~ ~ 1 N~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 z ~ ` i ( ~ , " _n I \ - n ~ ~,[ r7 n O 1 /~ --- a o 1 w ~~ n ~ /'" ~ ~ ~ ~ d ,,.~!~ .-.-.---}t t i I .,~ n MY7jF13A0 '~~ / an 1 _ _. _. _ _. sr G O 1 ~rr''~ a'~"~' - _.__._ ~ -- ~ o ~ -- `~ T ~ ~ . ~ ~ I i 1 ~ 1 :6 / 1 ~ ,Si ~~, 1 o ~ j ~~ 4 ~ 1 ~ ss 'L[ rtciaa \ 1 `, ~ ~~ ~! ~ dOls~ ~v snag w w S~' Q In x w ©~ ~-.~ I ~ W i ~ M ayy 'J l ~ V ti ~ U r.^) jtt©pvl r~r~ f o ~ Q n ~ ~- z ~ ro a ~I z~¢i~z I ~= z i ° ~ © ~~ ;W ~! ~ i i i;' -~ ---~ ff - ~ ~~ i ry~~ ! o~0 0 0 U N ~ ~ ~~ ~, ~ ~ i~ t I~ <` p§~ ~ ~i -I ~ ~ Y ~~' O ~ ~ a j ~ a~ i L t i ~K ~ ~ ^ _ .__.- _.._ 1 i I ~~~/ --~-- ..~---~~, ~~N~ I N E E< * ~,h i~ ~ O ~ ~i-~ T~ ~ I ~~ ~ ~ ~! cn ~ ~ ~ i P d p " I q ~ ~~~ H ~ o1J Q ~ ' ~ t}- ~ VI I y~ _ W VN of\} C? ° d ~ ~~ ~ ~ , + ~ !1. ^ I I ° Q o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' RV ~ W TY ~ s( O ~ 2 y y ~ yp 3 ~ F ~ I') ~vJ ~ ~J ~ ~ ~ * 4y ~ I MJ'°ey 5~ QQ~~ $ b:l ~ ~ 'Q; I (S Y ~. i~ r W °J tt 3 j ``' ~ i S ZZ~ N ~ ~ ~ -Z'{ n ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 9 < i[ 4 ~ i5 a~ ~ ~i ~ ~ E ~ Ly IJ ~ ~ E L g ~ ' 1$ i ~ 3~ ~ J ~ Q ~i z ~ f ~~ ~ i~ ~~~ ~ ~ 4 i ~I ~ ~ ~ =z • t ~ ~ ~ ~____ ~ sr i s ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ii ~ ~ ~ jw ~~ ~ I 'Ci1~ O O 70 q ' {{ as I~ ~ WZ ~ 7 y ~ 7 W ~ F ~ ~ ~J ~T M1'V ~ `1 V a ~ ~ ' (~ Z ~ ~ y J Eby 2 ~ LY ~ ~ W ~ i- y~ F w J O ~ ~ ~ .I {y~ `_.____.._ ~ _ W1~" _3 ( 2 _~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ 7 2 WV ~ j ~ a < Z ~ ~' W k1 O Z y Q ~ W O~ O 4 G tt4JJJ W W W x X X W W X W ~ ( t t W W W I © I ZW wJ J ~ ~ U U V W 1 V~ UGSI W ri ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ;~ ~ y W 2 t r Ia~VI V ~ ~ ~ ~- W J W i i I $ ~ 0 b I I I ~ a i m ci D' $ c' ~' ~ o c~ c> `~ a w ~., w~ W x < 5 5 ? n a n n a a in V 1 i- F ca $ ~ ~ ~ "~ i x ( 1 v~ ~ ~ I~ 1 ~~~ ---- -- ~ i i! ! .i.t m ~~ r-- __ S ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~:= .f u ._ ~ ~> 1 I 1 I !~ 'fib ~ ~I Z ~ ~ ¢¢ NIV ~ F i c ~ .`~.a. o m Y !~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ yu u fe siF ( ~~ 3c ~ r, c < 2. !~ ~ i^ ~ I r` c.: .c In I u ~ ~ ' .N l i i 4 i r o ~ ~ Z I I 4 w ~ ~ W ~ U~ N i. ~ I .. ~ 'y3 ~ III m 3 I ~ ~~~ ~ ~ F 5 ff~ J ~ ~ ~' --; . `~~ 4 w ~' ~~ < I ~ ~ I I a ~ f ~' O ~ f ~ f ~~ j~ ~o . d< a 7 I. 0. W W ~ y~ ~~ ~°~~ "t k~ ~~~~ ~ ~ _ ~ ',i CY.~ L, Z J _~N ~L;iz i M ~ ~; ~ iv.. w ~ ~ W ~ Z ~ ~~_ I ~ i ~ ~ S A ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ w~ ~ ~~ ~- C-- ~ ~ ,. _ nay; ~ r ~ _._ 1 ,, ~ b ~ ~-- ~ 3 ~ ~ I ~ ~ w ~ ~ i ~ . P ~ . -..., ~ t ~ ~ ~ ! ~ _ 55~~ ~ ~ __ J ____ ' C_ O y # ~ ~ ~'' ~ ` a I 1 ¢ Nth i 0.1 I II G.- I I ?~1' I O ._... f .._ y( rte-. i - , aroquNMrrlt '~wo - a q f 1 ~p, I _ ~iC I ~i c I ~~ I ~~ O I ~ j R +- _ u I W r "tpom ~ ~ 1 ~ o E& I ~ ~ U I ~ ¢ ~ ..~ ~ 1 _ I `~ i I :; ~ i ~ N ~ ~ I g ~< I .I / 1, iii I r, / ~ i p~ I I I %/ / ii i I iii I // / N us >oNS 'xaJ I I ,~ / ~/ ~ ~ I tI ~~ ~~ P~Q ~ ~ ~ tm ~o-sec ~ ~t~ ~v ~ I I ~ I ~ 1 1; 'i~ I a3 I ( ~ I 1 1 ,1 I $ 1 Oz0-8z0-so+ ~i ~ // /43A0 '^ {8f0-Y10-99f 'A15 3N0 'x3 ~,.~ Q~ % roa i ~~j x3 S'£SZ= „S 1, l0. _ N n - _J ~ e L° L , ~ I I ~ ~ 1 / ii ~ I i/ ~. ii o_ I I ~'!' iii// \~ \ii \i \~ \~ ~3~ ~~ ~l ~l ~ ~ j 1 ~ I ~J \J \~ a~ ~ ~ \~ X-~J \J I 1 ~ ' P I ~. ~ m °O 1 / ~ wo-ezo-cor t i~ i~ z \ \J \~ \~ 11 I 1 I ~ i ~ 1 ~ \J ~ ~ \~ \g \~ \ ~ J ` l ®~ J~ l ~ ; J 1 I y I ~ J ~-~-I ~ ~1 \~~ ~ f ,~e ~~ O la 1 1 I i ~ ~ ~ ~ I it I ~ -~, \ 1 9Z 8iC68N - ~ ~-srs -1 1 I .~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ M, ~~ .LBS~ L - ~ ,~ i I rzo-ezo-ror \ ~ I I L+ _ \ J --Z- -S~'J ~ 1 ~I ~ 1 a I 8 \ ~ I; ~~~l \ I \J ~l ~l ~1 m~.r '~ N ~ I I I ~ ~i J o ~ ~ ~ I I a3HS ~ \~ ~ \~ 1 ~ ~ ~ `~ .ea.i \ ` J ,fs 1 ei~.na 4i TM I 1 ~ v® lth \ .i \ J l J ~ ^ ' 1 - L__ ~ \~ 1\~ III I I I~ ~ i~ ~ ~ i I ~! i o -- ~ ~l.8rl~ J~° 1 1 11 ~ '~o N ~l ~ I OSII ~ - I 1 Y >•J r' ~ ;, I g 1 4° oa ~ o ~ ~" I I 1 I Q 1! F ozo-LZO-ro- \ J ~ ^ '~ ~ i ~ 8I i ~~.1f~ ~ J n 1 ~ \ ® RO ` ~ I I ~ I / ~ \ ~ ~ . UD W 1 1 In ( ~ - 1 .J I o ~ ~ ~ M I ~ ~ ~ I \ ~ ~ N ~ 1 \ I I wo-Lao-co- ~' ~ ~ ©~ (oho ; ~ ~ I Z \~ \~ \~ \ I ~ t / h ys- - _ _ ~ I 8 I zao-LZO-ro. ~ 1 ~~~ /~ 1 _ ~ I ,~~ ap ^~ ~_-__ . _- _- F~ N 0 oa c~ LSO-til0-8BC ~ I I OSb-110~Bf _ ~ ~ '_ - - - - ~~ ' ~ v~-iu n n.7i 1 I I -~ ~ 2 ~ 1 I I j oo0-rto-sec --- ` - ~~i_ _' .~ S3 ~ _ - _ - 1 ! + 1 1 11 I Z--- rL---L--~ 1 ~--L- I-------_ ~ ~~ us ions •x3 I I ~ I I us brs ~ -+w-esc ~ ~ ~ 1 .~ >o 1 ' ( I I lrLLw306311 I I us DNS 'X3 I I I 1 I I I I I~ ~ 1 I ~ i ~ ~ I 8 I'~ I ' II II - Y00.' BS ~0 AS C: ;7p .q{ ^-~P'rI~F10~iZCtlC7C;ice-a~:41Qt$~]'QY'~.^ i • ~ -. xoJ LLff'IIrL'Olf ro~ ~r~ l~/~s ~ 1 L l f f '1 V L 'O I f LEo-~lO-6e>~ 7~~ Y _ OIi1'Ir 'SID '~11iVMiN ' 'i A'r NOS 111 i f O 11 1 f S f V v W O.YI Iv VOVVF~~V 1'MW~/~1 ~`.c. n'"~., _ i c~ ~IIY '~Ii1SJ1011 Nlli)i ~ ~ W; fLilii.. ~; ~ cu "fir ids r~ros z N ti~~ ~ ~ S10~J.IHO~Ib ~~~ ~ U ~ ~ ° ~Sf lOH MAN ~'~~ ~`° ~131SJ10~1 I-W~I ~ i i i i i i i i -.-.L.-._.-._.-1-.-~-~-~- I ~i i i i Q ! i i i i --------,.------------------------------------------------------------1 ~ avo~ ollno ~ ~ ~ ( t a ~ .I_ . _I. - . .~ ~ I ~~ _ - -- - -- ll ------, I r----- ---~ I I i I~ ~I ~ I ( I I ~ I I ( I I ..~ I L- xu I - aoaw.r ~I ~ I I l>, I I ~ I I I I I I. I~ I I ____ ~~~ ~ ~\ ~~ I I I sl I I I I I I I e ~- I I I i v _`--~ _----- _._-- /~ I ~- I I I I I I I I ~ - I I I I I I I r-~- I I I I I I I I I I I • ~ r __ x•J iLfa•ir~•ois bJ `dJOl~Ht/S i• l~ L f s •i r~ •o t t L£O~10-68E iNdt~ o~srr tiro '~rvMan •a n v N O~ 1 it a a o~ i ~~ s ~Qd Ollt10 ~l-~ldH~l~O F~O~ ~~- f. - r yes wr~-s ~~z ~ 4F~ ¢ ~ ~ s'~ u Fora s. S103UH0l~d t-10~ ~Sf lOH MAN ~~~` * ` ~ z ~ ~131SJ10~lI~-W~~I ~~ ~` 's ~~ n _ _. _ ___ , I _ ; ._._ n ___ _ o ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ 9 ~ ,~9•sol I .. I ~ i I ~Y ~ ~ - ~x I I I ~ ~ , I i ~ I I I ~ I I i SIN ~ ~ ry~~ ~ ~ I I ~ I I _I ~ I ~_ I I ~ ~ ml I i _' ~ I ~ i ~ ( I I •~ I ~ ~ I ~~ ~o I / n~ ~ . I I ~/ I I ~ ~> / I ~ I I I I / ~~ / I I o ~ ~ bg•L9 ~,_.1._._._._._ ,_._,_.+,_. ~„ Off, b5o I ON ~ 4 I i 4 M ~ ~--- ~. ~', a•-~•~ t I • ~. __\ \ -~ ~~ r! i Mi i J (t• V , ~ ~~ O J ~i y/~ ~ a ,§ ~-- - --- 0 Xpr LLtli'Ir1'Oli I~1 LLtf'IrL'0111 o~str tir7 '~IrlvwaN 'i/~W NOfliliY011 If1i `III 11i1fJ1011 M~li~l S1~311H~~id ~131SJ10~i H.U~~I caw-see ~- /~~ b~ `~oldae-s aVvo OlUlO -~~H~dO F~OO weds wr~-s ~ 10~ ~S~OH MAN a • _ ~~ ~ ~~ r U ~N~ Q~ f> # ~~~ i 4 S a t 1 1' 1 1 1 1 1 1 l~'P`P`P'-I I N - ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OfrOfi PAr7i1'r9 n QgpL G9G Q909 ?90C; OGOG 'JONB J6D n i- . ~ t . -~ O~ J `' .o-, c .t-,Qr ~ ~w-rts. ~ r~r.r.r ~~ E` xxxxxK ~l~i~~C ~ s Y o ~ a e 1 r I ~ 0®©®®~ b ! _ in ~- Q 4 ' f ~. ~ .. .~.~_.~.._W_,~__.., Q r ~ ~ LL • • ~ .IhG .o-,r .i-,r • - O 00 OG! ~dQ ~~ m m ~ -n ~ ~ ~ I i I i_..__..____._.` ~_ ~_-~~_~ d - ~,-_, ~` ~ ~ ~. (' __-- ___._._ s aQ ~~ I , \ d ~ ~ 1b ~~ ^ -~ d I ---------------- i --- I I i ------ ------ `~ T I ' ~ i- ~ 1 ~ ' ` ' ' n T xvr «ys•Ir~•ols _ 1 • i ~ ~ t >i •1 r ~ •0 1 ,s LEO~VIO-68E: fNdd bJ `brJO1d1~S o~str tiro 'IIiIVMiN IN^~ + _ •i A ~I N O f l it i Y 011 I f f f ~~ 0~~ ~`-~~'..'~ F~ ,FS~ ~~ `Ilv 11i1fJ.011 Nlli~l ~ ~ .~ N q IH:~I~bS YVf1~1S N ~` b ~ S103UHO~Ib fir, ~~~ Q ~13LSJ10~1 ~~~ ~ 10~ ~Sf10H MAN ~ . ,~ 0 ----- ~ - ., -, i `~`^^. VJ `/ Z r .~,~IISi ~~~-----,-.-~i°se,~_t~e±-t~_~.. T mere L it ~_ ~ _ ~._ X ¢X¢ X X X ~ __ *~esb~ ~I o®o®©® ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~- c ~__ -- a .._-- b ___ _ . _ _._- . _. a .f-,a - -- -- ~ Q -- ,vl Y -© LL .o-,r ., .-, n o~ ~ o,~ ~ _ --- , --,; ~_ , ~__ :, ----- _ ', - i i ~:_J ~ i i i i i ~ o~ ~ o.o< e! ~~ ;~ ~, ._,- x.~ ~.~t•t•Ir~.•ols ~ 1 •1 < < >r f •I r ~. •o I ,t LEO''V'i0-66E fNdt/ b~ `VOOlVd1~l8 Ofilrr YO 7111rMiN ,1 ~ ~ `f~ - X 'i/~'I NOf111tfOi1 Iffi ~~ QL~ -~~ ~ t~iC `II'I 11ilfA0ii Nlli)I n-~eods wrro-s ~ ~ ~ i ~ S10311HO~Id ~f> ~~ Q d~1S~lO~J ~~~ ~ 101 SSf lOH MAN ~ 1 Xo~ itff•II.~•ola ~ I • l ~ ~ ~ f •I ~ ~ •o I s LEO-fi10-68E fNd~d bJ `~/rJOlH~S _ S rf o f f f ~ ,r o~ ti v M a N QyOd Ollf l0 6EOEl-~I~/HJ~10 F~ 'acv NOflalaY011 Iffi ~~ `II`I 71alfA0i1 Nlli~l r' woods wrros ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S103UH0l~d ~.> ~ fi~ _ z Q ~131SJ10~1 ~~~ ~ 101 ~Sf10H MAN ~, xo.l Llif'IrL'Oli 1 •1 1 11~ i •1 r l •o I f LfA-~'l0-~ ~NdV ~HJ `drJOldH~S •a n v N oii ti a i o y ~i i is QbOS 011f10 690-QHyH~JO H~IJ~;IOQ ~` * ` `II`I 11i1i~1011 Mlli~l ~ ~ ~~ i~erods wrro-s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S10~1IH0l~`d ~f> ~~~ _ ~ Q ~131SJ10~1 H.U~~I ~' 101 ~Sf10H MAN ~ It ~ • • • xo~ L~fs•irL•ois i • i ~ ~ f: •i r ~ •o i s LEO-'V{4-~E ~NdV 11J `dOOltIHVS _ •a n v N of i a~i s' o y ~ i o i i aVOd 011f10 6801.-~IdHOHO F#. ~,~ ~ "'~ ~ `II`I 71a11A011 Nlla)I woes wrros ~ S103UHO~Id ~:> " '~ z i ~ S3LSJl0l~ H.U~~I ~ 101 ~Sf10H MAN • ~ W Q J ~~~a~ °~~G~ ~~~~a 3 j}'~ ~ . ~ ~R* ~~ # --- ~ 3 .. 3 •I~I+Id F~~ ~I vv,T ~~- x.. _ € ~~ J • ~ ~• _ _ t iYy ,af j~ Fa ia... 4 y~ ; ~ ~xon j A ~Jif 2 ~•_~- ~ c I1i ~, `1 . -i ~ i :~r r.y• y. qo _ ~ _.~ I~ 8 ~ ~ z $ H uvy~ ~- w a . ~~ °i a a • ~' • . $1 ~ ~ ~ N _ ~ $ ~i d s (~; s' o ~ ~ ~_ , .; Y ------ -- -------J e ~ ~ ' s A ~ ~R' I C { 3 s w I J ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ 77i ~ 4 L ~ ---- - ~ g r ----------- .~ ~ s~~ , \ ' l' ,, . d 3AiY0 ~iN~.lfW~1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P~ tl ... w I x ~, a ~- f _ ~~ / ~i \•...~ ~I i ~ ,~ ~~ S ~ a o ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ o ~~ ~ ~ a~~ ~ o~ g~ ~ H F 8~r~ v oen Q~+ss isa *si~s e a a da ~ ~ o ~ , ~ 3^ ~ i ?~~} ~s~ ~~4~ ~ a I Z °Zi~ a~ ' -~ J ~ ~~ z a_gg ~F°~ Sa.O Caj ac x ~ $ ~ S ~GO `e.x ~Ae® ~ ^ a _ ~ ~ O ~ I Ur o d c z ;o ~, ~ ~ ~~ z wZ~ ~ Q c U ~ ~ ~ Q t ~ ~~~ ~ ~ i~ ~ c $y '~ Y yY ~ _~ S x S ~. ~~ T T I 1~ d l ~ y P ~; ~a~~ ~:~ ..~ 8 2~;; s, ~i x~8° T i eo ~b s Tf d Z `~ .ddS( ~ ~~ W ~k~ = J _a Y! ~ ~ O s ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ g ~~ '~ ~~ ~ ~ g ~~ 1 .7 O ,p J 0. `\ ~ c O ~ ~~ ti ~W~~d ti~ ~R~ ~~ Zr > ' ~ ~ a -+ s ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ <a88 ~8h F a ~~~ ~ ~~ 4 ~ ~~ ~ _~ ~a v ~~- ~ ,~ 4A ...,~ ~I R 4 '~' 7 ~l~ \~ T • g i • • / r `. J ~'\ _... _~ L ~ s ~~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ X tQ ~Y ~ ~ i1 T ,k ~~ >~ ~o ~ ~ p{~ ~ ~,s~s5 ~~ ~~ ~ [~ ~E L~~ ~L I~ 0 a V ~ ~ i~ 3e ~~ ~;~ Q ~' ~ ~= ~~E z ~~~ ~ ~~ y~pp Y~ n k k ~ q ~y ~ ~ry~ ~~ $~gi ~ . ~ q''~ ~~~~ ~~ s e ~~ZO~~ k ~ --uo~s.e N • b~ • ~` ~ ~g ° 0 S _'~_. L S ~~__~_~~ an~~o v+~ldvw ~ ~. ~p 9 C ~ _ i ~ I I I %w t .~- i:- ;~ $ ~`~ ~ ' ~_ ~ i i / ~.~ t - i •. ,, ~ \ ~ ~! (` ~ _ ~~ I t ^ .) ;' ~ a P /_ Q~ a 0 0 d r _~ ® a z a, r L z ® o~ s < ~ ,. o~~ r ~~c ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ u 0~~ ~ ~ ~ Z~ - 3 r 2~ 2 W Ve ~ a ~ 3 2 D ~ *. ~n- a ~c:a _. dtl ~,-~ ~ yy H 8~eo$ n ~ 7 r ~` gs .i qq S 2 ~. s` ~~ ~ _ ~. W Z J ~~jF~ f ~t~~~~ ,.111 • _ _- - -a _ __ - - ~ i E o _._. _.... ~~.~<< _ oo. ~~ < <. ~ n s a oe ~ °`t~g e S~c~=°w o ~~s ` ~ li'!(1~~ a=~ ~ _ ~ ~ H~ISi'I~Q 7 S1~~ ~o~°LsoE +=:s ~ ~~ g SNb'~d 3d'dSSQNb'~ - _ - ~ ~ a ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ laJ ~ o ~- = ~~ ~ V ~ m ' y2 Q ~ ~ a q . d a d a i U y +' C ~ C O ~' ' tl N N C 6 v C O C Q N a N O r L V ~ tl 3 tl N C y i O p) 4 tl ~~ ~ L O. eo a 3 - b~ '~ ~ U E UI N O ry ~ tl ~~ tl ~ O C ~j d u1 d a V U O }. E 4+ 9 p N tl tl W L tl i' N E C a s a O p O i 7 i'' C C T 1 3 U N~ a ~~ U~ Q O L V_ H 1~- „ i ~ i C i~ N N> i v 4 L~~ C i' a 0 C f tl O 3 ~' p~ N Q ~ i _ W 3~ 0~ C d U a tl t W i Q tl d O tl N 9 U a i+ p y~ 6 O C E tl ~ Y N ~ ~ . N O~~N } U~ Ep~C i ~ (~ J WU Utl Q 1 U O tl C ~ CD ~ y N d Q Q ~ ~ oo~ 3c i + '«i Z ; - >UJ Lt; C7 Q ~ E U N O tl f7 tl p 3N1~ 2~~1dM iN011(ld~ ~-- 0 0 ~ W /~, .~ ~~~ ^ ^ ~ i ~-- `i 0 ~~~MJ~~Ja ~ I in 1 in `- ~ '- I 1 I ~ ~ gg ~ ~~ e 4 ~ ~ N ~ g ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ f ~~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ 1 n s C " ~. ~o ~ ~ ~ ~Q ~ ° s ~ ~ ( ~ -' 1 1 d ~ d i ~ ./ 1 J ~~~ 1 ~. }~d~y _ 1 .~t ~ llj I - Z !'~ J / 1 I 1 ~ , 1 iX j 1 1 • • • 't ~rJ 1`d~JVS ` i o i sss cs ~s oz eoi l~ b 0 L£0-bL0-68E #Ndt1 YIl~~~ NINI l V ~ V Y V ,1 Vo11 a Y s * 4/y44 uNU " ~ 0 db'O~I Ollfl~ 680£L-dl~`dH~~lO H~I~»Od ~ ' ~~ ~ ° " ~ ~ 3 ~+oo~e la3eoa ~ s ~ o ~~nl~n~il~oH ~; ~ z ~- o oQ ~Sf10H MAN Z ° ~n~d~~0 M,,.,,x ,,,,,~,~ W o _ N o X Q Q Q Q X Q p Z Q Q Y ~ U H LJ..~ Z Z ~3 ao U ~ -~ Z W r-i I- W W Q W ~ ~ U p Q Z U ~ Z p p ~ ~ ~ W U 0 ~ ~ ~ Y u ~ ~ ~ (~ ~, ,8 ~ ,~ J W W J W Q Q L7 N N • • • • • • Item 3E REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No./Location: 04-132/ 13089 Quito Road -Lot 6 Applicant/Owner: Salim Sagarchi Staff Planner: Ann Welsh, AICP, Associate Planner Date: November 10, 2004 APN: 389-14-37 Department Head: 13089 Quito Road -Lot 6 ~~~®~®~ # 04-132 /Design Review -Lot 6 13089 Quito Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY Application filed: Application complete Notice published: Mailing completed: Posting completed: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 5/6/04 10/15/04 10/27/04 10/26/04 10/15/04 This Design Review application is a request to construct atwo-story residence on a 12,092 square foot lot located in the R-l, 10,000 zoning district. The lot is bounded by the cul-de-sac, Dorcich Court, Martha Avenue and Quito Road. The home is designed in a neo-craftsman style with lap siding, lightweight concrete brown the roof. The home is located within a new subdivision that was the former site of the Dorcich Orchard. The home is intended to be compatible architecturally with the historic farmhouse that is retained on Lot 5 of the subdivision. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Design Review application with conditions by adopting the Resolution for Application #04-132. ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft Resolution 2. Key Map 3. Arborist Report dated May 28, 2004. 4. Fire Department report dated May 25, 2004 5. Affidavit of Mailing 6. Neighborhood Correspondence 7. Plans, Exhibit "A" • ~~'~~'® # 04-132 /Design Review - I.ot 6 13089 Quito Road STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R-1,10,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: M-10 -Medium Density Residential MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE:12,092 square feet AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: Average Slope of the lot is less than 10%. GRADING REQUIRED: No grading of the site is proposed. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed project consisting of asingle-family residence is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-family residences. The project site is in an urbanized area and is connected to utility and roadway infrastructure. MATERIALS AND COLORS PROPOSED: The house is to be tan, lap siding with white trim and brown roof tiles. ~~~~~~ # 04-132 /Design Review -Lot 6 13089 Quito Road LOT SIZE LOT COVERAGE Building Footprint Walkways, Patio ~ Driveway TOTAL FLOOR AREA Main Floor Second Floor TOTAL SETBACKS Front Rear North Side South Side Height Residence PROPOSED CODE REQUIREMENTS 12,092 sQ. FT. 12,000 sQ. FT. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE 30%. 60% 2,187 sQ. >~ r. 1,469.6 sQ. FT. 3,656 sQ. FT. 7,255 sQ. FT MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE 2,187 sQ. FT. 1,330 sQ. FT. 3,517 sQ. Fr. 3,540 sQ. FT. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT 25 Fr. 25 Fr. 1ST FL. - 45 FT. 1ST FL- 10 FT. 2ND FL - 45 FT. 2ND FL- 10 FT. 1ST FL-10 FT. 1ST FL -10 FT. 2ND FL-30 FT. 2ND FL-15 FT. 1ST FL - 30 FT. 5 IN. 1ST FL - 25 FT. 2ND FL - 39 FT. 5 IN. 2ND FL -30 FT. 25 Fr. 26 r r. a • • # 04-132 /Design Review -Lot 6 13089 Quito Road , PROJECT DISCUSSION Design Review This Design Review application for Lot 6 involves review of a two story home with a design that is based somewhat on the Craftsman style which is typified in the Historic Mitchell house that is to be relocated from the center of the parcel onto Lot 5. The elevations depict a home with lap siding and lightweight concrete tiles that resemble slate shingles. In terms of the front facade, a low profile front entry with porch overhang is proposed. The entry door has nine divided lights in the upper half of the door. Sidelights and transom lights complete the door surround. The first floor front windows also have multi-pane sashes above the larger windowpane, which is typical of the Craftsman style. The plans propose lattice detailing below the upper eave, which reflects similar detail in the original Mitchell House. The design of the house has some of the detailing that is typically associated with Craftsman style dwellings but the character of the house would be enhanced with additional details that reflect the Craftsman style. The use of exposed rafter beams at the eaves and rock wainscoting of the porch columns is suggested to add additional texture and depth to the facade. The garage door should also reflect the Craftsman theme of the subdivision with multiple pane divided lights in the upper panel of the door. These details in the design of the house are recommended by staff in order to enhance the character of the development. The site plan proposes four drywells to rninim;~e storm water runoff in response to the site design regulations mandated by the Santa Clara Watershed C-3 Permit issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Sound Wall The site plan depicts a sound wall at the property line abutting Quito Road. The wall is stucco with brick columns. Redesign of the sound wall is recommended because the design is not consistent with the style of the subdivision or with the stated preferences of the neighbors. Staff recommends that an eight-foot high sound wall with river rock columns and wooden face along Quito Road be constructed along the property line. A wooden faced sound wall compliments the existing wall across Quito Road and is more consistent with the Craftsman character of the development. Necessary Findings The Zoning Ordinance, Section 15-45.080 identifies the following findings as necessary for granting Design Review approval. (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. (b) Preserve natural landscape. ~~~Q # 04-132 /Design Review -Lot 6 13089 Quito Road (c) Mirli_m~e perception of excessive bulk. (d) Compatible bulk and height. (e) Employs current grading and erosion control methods. (f) Utilizes Residential Design Guide policies and techniques. Actual Findings The following findings have been made regarding the proposed new construction. (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views andprivacy. The height, elevations andplacement on the site of theproposed main or accessory structure, when considered with reference to: (i) the nature and location of residential structures on adjacent lots and within the neighborhoods; and (ii) community view sheds will avoid unreasonable interference with views andprivacy. The proposed two-story dwelling will not interfere unreasonably with views and privacy. The home is centered on the lot such that the setbacks proposed exceed the minimum requirements. The zoning ordinance allows a 10-foot rear yard setback while the plans depict a 45-foot rear yard setback. The exterior side yard setback along Martha Drive also exceeds the minimum allowable and the plans depict tree retention and a landscaped area along the Martha Drive frontage, which contributes to the sense of privacy along Martha Drive. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. The natural landscape will be p eserved insofar as practicable by designing structures to follow the natural contours of the site and inimizing tree and soil removal; grade changes will be minimized and will be in keeping with the g neral appearance of neighboring developed areas and undeveloped areas. Development on this lot would impact 11 trees. The plans propose to retain 7 of these trees, which are located at the perimeter of the lot. The plan is consistent with design guidelines if it is revised to eliminate paving in proximity to tree #9, which is a significant coast live oak. Since the plan proposes to retain the existing topography, minimize grading and maximize tree retention, this reflects sensitivity to the design guideline of preserving the natural landscape. (c) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. The proposed main or accessory structure in relation to structures on adjacent lots and to the surrounding region will minimize the perception of excessive bulk and will be integrated into the environment. The design does not depict excessive bulk. Although a second story is proposed, the area of the second floor in relation to the first floor is proportional and the varying roofline serves to minimize the perception of bulk. The added design details recommended in the project discussion would also serve to vary the facade, add texture to the front facade and minimize the perception of bulk. (d) Compatible bulb and height. The proposed main or accessory structure will be compatible in terms of bulk and height with (I) existing residential structures on adjacent lots and those within the L~~~®® # 04-132 /Design Review -Lot 6 13089 Quito Road immediate neighborhood and within the same zoning district; and (ii) the natural environment; and shall not (iii) unreasonably impair the light and air of adjacentproperties to utilize solar energy. The proposed two-story home is located in a neighborhood that is predominantly single story in character. However, the existing historic Mitchell house, which is the design inspiration for the proposed home, is a two-story structure and the Lot 6 design reflects this style. (e) Current grading and erosion control methods. The proposed site development or grading plan incorporates currentgrading and erosion control standards used by the Ciry. The proposed design retains the natural topography since changes to the grade surrounding the house are minimal. Also the plan reflects the mandate by the Regional Quality Control Board to limit impervious coverage and storm water runoff. The proposed drywells are designed to slow runoff and retain the first flush of storm water. (fl Design policies and techniques. The proposed home will conform to each of the applicable design policies and techniques set forth in the Residential Design Handbook The above analysis supports the conclusion that the findings rec{uired for granting design review approval can be met provid ~ the applicant carries out the conditions outlined in the resolution of approval. The City Arborist and the Santa Clara County Fire istrict have reviewed this application. Their comments are included as conditions f approval. • l%~~'~~ # 04-132 /Design Review -Lot 6 13069 Quito Road , Neighborhood Input Resolution #03-049, which granted tentative subdivision approval of this lot, required that the applicant hold a meeting with the surrounding neighbors to obtain a consensus on the design of the homes within the subdivision. Attachment # S, which is included in this staff report, contains the notices that were signed by the surrounding neighbors. The map below depicts those parcels that approved the design of the proposed homes. As can be seen from the map, the neighbors across Martha Drive have not all given approval to the proposed design. However, the landscaped buffer and tree retention that is proposed along Martha Drive serve to mitigate the visual impact of the two-story home proposed on Lot 6. • • • # 04-132 /Design Review -Lot 6 13089 Quito Road CommunltyDevelopment The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A", New House- Lot 6, Salim Sagarchi, Dorcich Orchard, 13089 2uito Road, Saratoga prepared by Keith Royster, Architect, dated 2/10/03, date stamped 10/28/2004. The conditions of approval identified in this report shall be incorporated into the revised plans. The design shall be revised to enhance the architectural detailing in the facade and reflect Craftsman style architecture. Exposed rafter beams at the eaves and river rock facing of porch columns are required to meet the design review guidelines. In order to support this design the porch columns should taper from the base to the top to add additional texture and depth to the facade. The garage door should continue the Craftsman theme of the subdivision with multiple pane divided lights in the upper panel of the door. These details in the design of the house are required in order to enhance the character of the development. 2. Four sets of complete construction plans incorporating required revisions and this Resolution on a separate plan page shall be submitted to the Building Division. 3. The landscape plan shall be installed prior to grantin final planning approval of the project. 4. Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and op rated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain a d infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. 5. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hadscaped area. 6. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. 8. Proper maintenance of landscaping, with minimal pesticide use, shall be the responsibility of the property owner. 9. The site plan shall be stamped and signed by a Licensed Land Surveyor who verifies the accuracy of the boundaries. • ~`~~~Q # 04-132 /Design Review - L.ot 6 13089 Quito Road , 10. Prior to pouring of foundation, the setbacks identified in the approved plans shall be verified by a licensed land surveyor. This verification shall be documented by a signed and sealed statement from the Surveyor. This statement shall be submitted to the building inspector prior to pouring foundation. 11. The sound wall design shall be revised to provide a durable wall with solid wood facing along Quito Road. The wall at the Quito Road property line shall not exceed 8 feet in height. 12. The plan data on sheet SP-1 shall be revised to correct the impervious coverage ratio. The impervious coverage is 30% as per the submitted data. 13. The paving for curb and street in the vicinity of Tree # 9 shall be revised to allow sufficient undisturbed area under the root zone to promote continued health of this tree. Fire Protection District The Santa Clara County Fire District reviewed this application on May 25, 2004 and their requirements are included as conditions of approval: Required Fire flow: the fire flow for this project is 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. The required fire flow is available from area water mains and fire hydrants(s), which are spaced at the required spacing. 2. Public Fire Hydrant Required: Provide 1 public fire hydrant at locations to be determined by the fire department and the San Jose Water Company. Hydrants shall have a minimum single flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual with spacing not to exceed 500 feet. 3. Timing of required water supply installations: Installations of required fire service and fire hydrants shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested and accepted. 4. Garage Fire Sprinkler Required: An approved automatic fire sprinkler system designed per National Fire Protection Association Standard #13D and local ordinances, shall be provided for the garage. To ensure proper sprinkler operation, the garage shall have a smooth, flat, horizontal ceiling. 5. Fire Apparatus Access Roads Required: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15%. Installations shall conform to Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications. • to t~n~~'~ # 04-132 /Design Review -Lot 6 13089 Quito Road CityArborist Report The City Arborist reviewed this project and prepared a report dated May 28, 2004. The recommendations of this report are included as conditions of approval. The proposed project on this lot would impact 11 trees of Ordinance size (#9-18 and 28). They include one Coast Live Oak (#9), seven Coast Redwoods (#10-16), two Canary Island Pines (#17,18) and one Evergreen Ash (#28). The new roadway is proposed approximately six-and-a-half feet from tree #9's trunk. Unless the portion of curb, gutter and road within 15 feet of tree #9's trunk can be designed entirely on top of existing soil grade (i.e. a no dig design), The arborist recommends the road be redesigned to be no closer than 10 feet from the tree's trunk Tree #10, a Coast Redwood located beneath high-voltage electrical lines, is declining. An estimated SO-percent of its canopy has died and further decline is expected. Its removal is recommended and no replacements are suggested. Per City Ordinance, a bond equal to 100% of the appraised value of trees planned for retention is required to promote their protection. They include #9-15,17 and 18, and have a combined value of $16,467. The September 11, 2002 arborist report identifies 36 fruit tree of Ordinance size scattered throughout the property. Many are dead while the others app ar in overall poor condition. For this reason, their removal is appropriate and mitigation is n t suggested. The below recommendations are intended to be used in conjunction with those presented in the September 11, 2002 report. 1. Tree protective fencing shall be installed precisely as shown on the attached map and established prior to any demolition, grading, surface scraping, construction or heavy equipment arriving on site. It shall be comprised of five- to six-foot high chain link mounted on two-inch diameter, galvanized steel posts, driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 12 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process. 2. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the fenced areas (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: grading, surface scraping, trenching, storage and dumping of materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 3. The arborist recommends protective fencing remain installed throughout the landscape installation phase. Small openings can be created at that time (i.e. only immediately before landscape construction begins) to only allow for foot traffic and wheelbarrow access. • ~~C~~~~~ # 04-132 /Design Review - IAt 6 13089 Quito Road 4. Item #1 from the 9/11/02 report should be followed and the plans revised accordingly. An option to doing so involves designing the portion of curb, gutter and roadway within 20 feet of tree #9's trunk entirely on top of existing grade (i.e. a no dig design). S. The surveyed locations of tree trunks #14-16 and 28 must be shown on all future site, grading and drainage, and landscape plans submitted to the City. Upon being available, plans showing grading and drainage, irrigation, and underground utilities shall be reviewed by the City for tree impacts. 6. All underground utilities (i.e. water, gas, sewer, electrical) and drainage features (such as drain lines, swales and dissipaters) should be designed outside from beneath canopies of retained trees. The arborist should be consulted if this is not feasible. 7. Supplemental water shall be supplied every two weeks to each retained tree during the months of April thru November. This should begin at the start of grading and continue through construction. The arborist recommends a rate of 10 gallons per inch of trunk diameter applied using soaker hoses placed on the soil beneath the mid- to outer- canopies. 8. All underground pipes and imgation lines planned for removal beneath the canopies of retained trees should remain buried and cut off at existing soil grade. 9. Irrigation trenches should be designed no closer than 10 times the trunk diameter of trees being retained. Where this is not feasible, the irrigation system must be a drip- type system placed on top of existing soil grade. 10. Irrigation spray should reach no closer than three feet from a tree's trunk (including those of newly installed trees). All forms of irrigation for new trees must be of adrip- type system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. 11. Lawn or other plant material requiring frequent watering must comprise no more than 20-percent of the area beneath a tree's canopy. All other plant material should be drought tolerant. 12. Mulch, stones or other landscape features must be placed no closer than one-foot from the trees' trunks. Bender board should not be installed and tilling of the soil should not occur within 10 times the diameter of the nearest trunk. 13. The arborist recommends the boulders proposed for placement beneath tree #9's canopy be removed from the design. 14. Herbicides should not be used beneath tree canopies. Where used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. 15. The removal and pruning of trees must be performed under the supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and according to ISA # 04-132 /Design Review - L.ot 6 13089 Quito Road • • • standards. Information regarding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained by referring to the following website: http://www.isa-arbor.com/arborists/arbsearchhtml. 16. The removal of trees #16 and 28 should be mitigated by installing new trees on site that are equivalent to their combined value of $2,700. The replacement values are shown on the bottom of the table attached to the 9/1U02 report. Acceptable replacement species include ~uercus agrifolia, 2uercus lobata, ~uercus helloggii, ~uercus douglasii, ~uercus dumosa, Acer macrophyllum, Aesculus californica, Pseudotsuga menziesii and Sequoia sempervirens. The replacement species should be shown on future planting plan(s). ConclUSion The proposed residence is designed to conform to the policies set forth in the City's Residential Design Handbook and to satisfy all of the findings required within Section 15- 45.080 of the City Code if developed with the recommended conditions. The residence will not interfere with views or privacy, preserves the natural landscape and will minimize the perception of bulk. The proposal if developed with conditions and revisions, will satisfy all other zoning regulations in terms of allowable floor area, setbacks, maximum height and impervious coverage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Design Review application with conditions y adopting the Resolution for Application #04-132. 13 ~a~~~~.~ r~ ~_J Attachment 1 • # 04-132 /Design Review - L,ot 6 13089 Quito Road , RESOLUTION N0.04- APPLICATION N0.04-132 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sagarchi/ 13089 Quito Road -Lot 6 WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review approval to construct a 3,517 square foot two story home on Lot 6, a 12,092 square foot corner lot in the recently approved Dorcich Orchard subdivision. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS the project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-family residences. The site is in an urbanized area and is connected to utility and roadway infrastructure and involves the construction of one single family home; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Design Review approval, and the following findings have been determined: Policy 1, Minimize the perception of bulk The design uses architectural features to breakup massing. The house is two story with a cross gabled roof which reduces the mass of the roofline. Fenestration along the lower front facade includes elongated windows with multiple panes in the upper transom and large panes in the lower portion of the sash. The covered, porch with simple front door with sidelights and transom is low profile in design and proportion. Policy 2, Integrate structures with the environment Development on this lot would impact 11 trees. The plans propose to retain 7 of these trees, which are located at the perimeter of the lot. The plan is consistent with design guidelines if it is revised to eliminate paving in proximity to tree #9, which is a significant coast live oak. Since the plan proposes to retain the existing topography, minimize grading and maximize tree retention, this reflects sensitivity to the design guideline of preserving the natural landscape. L~"v ~!' ~ Ji.J # 04-132 /Design Review -Lot 6 13089 Quito Road Policy 3, Avoid interference with privacy The proposed two-story dwelling will not interfere unreasonably with views and privacy. The home is centered on the lot such that the setbacks proposed exceed the minimum requirements. The zoning ordinance allows a 10-foot rear yard setback while the plans depict a 43-foot rear yard setback. The exterior side yard setback along Martha Drive also exceeds the minimum allowable and the plans depict tree retention and a landscaped area along the Martha Drive frontage, which contributes to the sense of privacy along Martha Drive. Policy 4, Preserve views and access to views The proposed two-story dwelling will not interfere unreasonably with views and privacy. The home is located on a triple frontage corner lot and is centered on the lot such that the setbacks proposed exceed the minimum requirements. Tree retention and a landscaped area along the Martha Drive frontage, which contributes to the sense of privacy and preserves views along Martha Drive. Policy 5, Design for maximum benefit of sun and wind • The location of the house does not block the sun of any neighbors since additional setback is provided. The mature trees to be retained provide shade and wind block therefore the design maximizes existing landscaping and doe not interfere with the solar access of neighbors. Now, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of he City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the application by for Design Review approval is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: Community Development The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A", New House- Lot 6, Salim Sagarchi, Dorcich Orchard, 13089 Quito Road, Saratoga prepared by Keith Royster, Architect, dated 2/10/03, date stamped 10/28/2004. The conditions of approval identified in this report shall be incorporated into the revised plans. 1. The design shall be revised to enhance the architectural detailing in the facade and reflect Craftsman style architecture. Exposed rafter beams at the eaves and river rock facing of porch columns are required to meet the design review guidelines. In order to support this design the porch columns should taper from the base to the top to add additional texture and depth to the facade. The garage door should continue the Craftsman theme of the subdivision with multiple pane divided lights # 04-132 / Desi~- Review -Lot 6 13089 Quito Road in the upper panel of the door. These details in the design of the house are required in order to enhance the character of the development. 2. Four sets of complete construction plans incorporating required revisions and this Resolution on a separate plan page shall be submitted to the Building Division. 3. The landscape plan shall be installed prior to granting final planning approval of the project. 4. Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. 5. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hadscaped area. 6. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. 7. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possibl . 8. Proper maintenance of landscaping, with minimal esticide use, shall be the responsibility of the property owner. 9. The site plan shall be stamped and signed by a Licensed Land Surveyor who verifies the accuracy of the boundaries. 10. Prior to pouring of foundation, the setbacks identified in the approved plans shall be verified by a licensed land surveyor. This verification shall be documented by a signed and sealed statement from the Surveyor. This statement shall be submitted to the building inspector prior to pouring foundation. 11. The sound wall design shall be revised to provide a durable wall with solid wood facing along Quito Road. The wall at the Quito Road property line shall not exceed 8 feet in height. 12. The plan data on sheet SP-1 shall be revised to correct the impervious coverage ratio. The impervious coverage is 30% as per the submitted data. 13. The paving for curb and street in the vicinity of Tree # 9 shall be revised to allow sufficient undisturbed area under the root zone to promote continued health of this tree. # 04-132 /Design Review - IAt 6 13089 Quito Road Fire Protection District The Santa Clara County Fire District reviewed this application on May 25, 2004 and their requirements are included as conditions of approval: 1. Required Fire flow: the fire flow for this project is 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. The required fire flow is available from area water mains and fire hydrants(s), which are spaced at the required spacing. 2. Public Fire Hydrant Required: Provide 1 public fire hydrant at locations to be determined by the fire department and the San Jose Water Company. Hydrants shall have a minimum single flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual with spacing not to exceed S00 feet. 3. Timing of required water supply installations: Installations of required fire service and fire hydrants shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested and accepted. 4. Garage Fire Sprinkler Required: An approved automatic fire sprinkler system designed per National Fire Protection Association Standard #13D and local ordinances, shall be provided for the garage. To ensure proper sprinkler operation, the garage shall have a smooth, flat, horizontal ceiling. S. Fire Apparatus Access Roads Required: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15%. Installations shall conform to Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications. City Arborist Report The City Arborist reviewed this project and prepared a report dated May 28, 2004. The recommendations of this report are included as conditions of approval. The proposed project on this lot would impact 11 trees of Ordinance size (#9-18 and 28). They include one Coast Live Oak (#9), seven Coast Redwoods (#10-16), two Canary Island Pines (#17,18) and one Evergreen Ash (#28). The new roadway is proposed approximately six-and-a-half feet from tree #9's trunk. Unless the portion of curb, gutter and road within 15 feet of tree #9's trunk can be designed entirely on top of existing soil grade (i.e. a no dig design), The arborist recommends the road be redesigned to be no closer than 10 feet from the tree's trunk • # 04-132 / Desi~ Review -Lot 6 13089 Quito Road Tree #10, a Coast Redwood located beneath high-voltage electrical lines, is declining. An estimated SO-percent of its canopy has died and further decline is expected. Its removal is recommended and no replacements are suggested. Per City Ordinance, a bond equal to 100% of the appraised value of trees planned for retention is required to promote their protection. They include #9-15, 17 and 18, and have a combined value of $16,467. The September 11, 2002 arborist report identifies 36 fruit trees of Ordinance size scattered throughout the property. Many are dead while the others appear in overall poor condition. For this reason, their removal is appropriate and mitigation is not suggested. The below recommendations are intended to be used in conjunction with those presented in the September 11, 2002 report. 1. Tree protective fencing shall be installed precisely as shown on the attached map and established prior to any demolition, grading, surface scraping, construction or heavy equipment arriving on site. It shall be comprised of five- to six-foot high chain link mounted on two-inch diameter, galvanized steel posts, driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 12 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process. 2. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities ust be conducted outside the fenced areas (even after fencing is removed). Thes activities include, but are not limited to, the following: grading, surface scraping, trenching, storage and dumping of materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 3. The arborist recommends protective fencing remain installed throughout the landscape installation phase. Small openings can be created at that time (i.e. only immediately before landscape construction begins) to only allow for foot traffic and wheelbarrow access. 4. Item #1 from the 9/11/02 report should be followed and the plans revised accordingly. An option to doing so involves designing the portion of curb, gutter and roadway within 20 feet of tree #9's trunk entirely on top of existing grade (i.e. a no dig design). 5. The surveyed locations of tree trunks #14-16 and 28 must be shown on all future site, grading and drainage, and landscape plans submitted to the City. Upon being available, plans showing grading and drainage, irrigation, and underground utilities shall be reviewed by the City for tree impacts. 6. All underground utilities (i.e. water, gas, sewer, electrical) and drainage features (such as drain lines, swales and dissipaters) should be designed outside from # 04-132 /Design Review -Lot 6 13089 Quito Road beneath canopies of retained trees. The arborist should be consulted if this is not feasible. 7. Supplemental water shall be supplied every two weeks to each retained tree during the months of April thru November. This should begin at the start of grading and continue through construction. The arborist recommends a rate of 10 gallons per inch of trunk diameter applied using soaker hoses placed on the soil beneath the mid- to outer-canopies. 8. All underground pipes and irrigation lines planned for removal beneath the canopies of retained trees should remain buried and cut off at existing soil grade. 9. Irrigation trenches should be designed no closer than IO times the trunk diameter of trees being retained. Where this is not feasible, the irrigation system must be a drip-type system placed on top of existing soil grade. 10. Irrigation spray should reach no closer than three feet from a tree's trunk (including those of newly installed trees). All forms of irrigation for new trees must be of a drip-type system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. 11. Lawn or other plant material requiring frequent watering must comprise no more than 20-percent of the area beneath a tree's canopy. All other plant material should be drought tolerant. 12. Mulch stones or other landsca e features must be laced no closer than one-foot P P from the trees' trunks. Bender board should not be installed and tilling of the soil should not occur within 10 times the diameter of the nearest trunk. 13. The arborist recommends the boulders proposed for placement beneath tree #9's canopy be removed from the design. 14. Herbicides should not be used beneath tree canopies. Where used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. 15. The removal and pruning of trees must be performed under the supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. Information regarding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained by referring to the following website: http://www.isa-arbor.com/arborists/arbsearchhtml. 16. The removal of trees #16 and 28 should be mitigated by installing new trees on site that are equivalent to their combined value of $2,700. The replacement values are shown on the bottom of the table attached to the 9/11/02 report. Acceptable replacement species include 2uercus agrifolia, ~uercus lobata, 2uercus helloggii, ~uercus douglasii, ~uercus dumosa, Acer macrophyllum, Aesculus californica, Pseudotsuga merl2iesii and Sequoia sempervirens. The replacement species should be shown on future planting plan(s). ~~~~'ti~~ # 04-132 /Design Review - I.ot 6 13089 Quito Road CITY ATTORNEY 1. Applicant agrees to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. 2. Noncompliance with any of the conditions of this permit shall constitute a violation of the permit. Because it is impossible to estimate damages the City could incur due to the violation, liquidated damages of $250 shall be payable to this City per each day of the violation. Section 2. Construction must be commenced within 36 months or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15-90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. r~ # 04-132 /Design Review -Lot 6 13089 Quito Road PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 10`h day of November 2004 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date • ~~'~°~ti~ • Attachment 2 C7 ~`~~~ • i f~ ~ ~ ~ ,, ~, ~ -._ ~-~.= - ~ _. ~. ~ ~~ .:~ -~-a=.'. -~ KEY PLAN • • .. _ .. .. .. ... ._ _ ,; • Attachment 3 r L_ ~~~~~~ ARBOR RESOURCES . Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care A TREE INVENTORY AND REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED NEW RESIDENCE AT 13089 QUITO ROAD -LOT 6 SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA OWNER'S NAME: SAGARCHI APPLICATION #: 04-132 APN #: 389-014-037 Submitted to: ~I Community Development Departure t City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 Prepared by: David L. Babby, RCA Registered Consulting Arborist #399 Certified Arborist #WE-4001A May 28, 2004 P.O. Box 25295. San Mateo. California 94402 • Email: arborresources@earthlink.net Phone: 650.654.3351 • Fax: 650.654,3352 • Licensed Contractor #796763 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist May 28, 2004 • SUMMARY The proposed project on this lot would impact 11 trees of Ordinance size (#9-18 and 28). They include one Coast Live Oak (#9), seven Coast Redwoods (#10-16), two Canary Island Pines (#17, 18) and one Evergreen Ash (#28). All but #14-16 and 28 are shown on plans reviewed. Two trees, # 16 and 28, aze in conflict with the proposed design and would be removed. Given the condition ratings assigned to these trees within the 9/11/02 report, their removal appears appropriate and replacements are recommended. The new roadway is proposed approximately six-and-a-half feet from tree #9's trunk. Unless the portion of curb, gutter and road within 15 feet of tree #9's trunk can be designed entirely on top of existing soil grade (i.e. a no dig design), I recommend the road be redesigned to be no closer than 10 feet from the tree's trunk (as per item #1, page 4 of the 9/11/02 City report). Tree #10, a Coast Redwood located beneath high-voltage electrical lines, is declining. An estimated 50-percent of its canopy has died and further decline is expected. I suggest its removal regardless of the proposed project and no replacements are suggested. Measures presented in the `Recommendations' section of 's report must be carefully followed and incorporated into construction plans. Per City Ordinance, a bond equal to 100% of the appraised value' of trees planned for retention is required to promote their protection. They include #9-15, 17 and 18, and have a combined value of $16,467. INTRODUCTION The City of Saratoga Community Development Department has requested I review the potential tree impacts associated with constructing asingle-family residence on a vacant lot at 13089 Quito Road -Lot 6, Saratoga. This report presents my findings and recommendations. Information regazding each tree is presented within the table attached to the City Arborist report dated September 11, 2002. Metal tags containing numbers corresponding to those presented within this report were found attached to each accessible tree trunk. Plans reviewed for this report include Sheets T-1, SP-0, SP-6 and A-6.4 (by Keith Royster Architects, dated 2/10/03) and Sheet L-7 (by Creative Horticulture, dated 04/04). The ~ The appraised tree values shown on the attached Tree Inventory Table are calculated in accordance with the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9'h Edition, published by the International Society of Arboriculture, 2000. Sagarchi Property, 13089 Quito Road -Lot 6, Saratoga Page 1 of 3 City of Saratoga Community Development Department ;~ ~=~ ty` '~ David L. Bobby, Registered Consulting Arborist May 28, 2004 trees' locations, numbers and canopy perimeters aze presented on an attached copy of Sheet SP-6 (Site Plan). Trees #14, 15, 16 and 28 aze not shown on plans reviewed. Their trunk locations have been added to the attached map and should not be construed as being surveyed. The September 11, 2002 azborist report identifies 36 fruit trees of Ordinance size scattered throughout the property. Many are dead while the others appear in overall poor condition. For this reason, their removal is appropriate and mitigation is not suggested. Please note I am unable to fully determine how many of these trees would be removed from this lot due to their high number as well as the lot boundaries not being seen. RECOMMENDATIONS The below recommendations are intended to be used in conjunction with those presented in the September 11, 2002 report. Tree protective fencing shall be installed precisely as shown on the attached map and established prior to any demolition, grading, surface scraping, construction or heavy equipment arriving on site. It shall be comprised of five- to six-foot high chain link mounted on two-inch diameter, galvanized steel posts, driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 12 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain . undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process. 2. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the fenced areas (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but aze not limited to, the following: grading, surface scraping, trenching, storage and dumping of materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and pazking. 3. I recommend protective fencing remain installed throughout the landscape installation phase. Small openings can be created at that time (i.e. only immediately before landscape construction begins) to only allow for foot traffic and wheelbarrow access. 4. Item #1 from the 9/11/02 report should be followed and the plans revised accordingly. An option to doing so involves designing the portion of curb, gutter and roadway within 20 feet of tree #9's trunk entirely on top of existing grade (i.e. a no dig design). 5. The surveyed locations of tree trunks #14-16 and 28 must be shown on all future site, grading and drainage, and landscape plans submitted to the City. Upon being available, plans showing grading and drainage, imgation, and underground utilities shall be reviewed by the City for tree impacts. 6. All underground utilities (i.e. water, gas, sewer, electrical) and drainage features (such as drain lines, swales and dissipaters) should be designed outside from beneath canopies of retained trees; I should be consulted if this is not feasible. Sagarchi Property, 13089 Quito Road -Lot 6, Saratoga Page 2 of 3 City of Saratoga Community Development Department .:.~ `.1 'V tiU David L. Bobby, Registered Consulting Arborist May 28, 2004 7. Supplemental water shall be supplied every two weeks to each retained tree during the months of April thru November. This should begin at the start of grading and continue through construction. I recommend a rate of 10 gallons per inch of trunk diameter applied using soaker hoses placed on the soil beneath the mid- to outer-canopies. 8. All underground pipes and irrigation lines planned for removal beneath the canopies of retained trees should remain buried and cut off at existing soil grade. 9. Irrigation trenches should be designed no closer than 10 times the trunk diameter of trees being retained. Where this is not feasible, the irrigation system must be adrip- type system placed on top of existing soil grade. 10. Irrigation spray should reach no closer than three feet from a tree's trunk (including those of newly installed trees). All forms of irrigation for new trees must be of adrip- type system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. 11. Lawn or other plant material requiring frequent watering must comprise no more than 20-percent of the area beneath a tree's canopy. All other plant material should be drought tolerant. 12. Mulch, stones or other landscape features must be placed no closer than one-foot from the trees' trunks. Bender board should not be installed an stilling of the soil should not occur within 10 times the diameter of the neazest trunk. 13.I recommend the boulders proposed for placement be eath tree #9's canopy be removed from the design. 14. Herbicides should not be used beneath tree canopies. Where used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. 15. The removal and pruning of trees must be performed under the supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. Information regazding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained by referring to the following website: http.•//www. isa-arbor. com/arborists/arbsearch. html. 16. The removal of trees # 16 and 28 should be mitigated by installing new trees on site that are equivalent to their combined value of $2,700. The replacement values are shown on the bottom of the table attached to the 9/11/02 report. Acceptable replacement species include Quercus agrifolia, Quercus lobata, Quercus kelloggii, Quercus douglasii, Quercus dumosa, Acer macrophyllum, Aesculus californica, Pseudotsuga menziesii and Sequoia sempervirens. The replacement species should be shown on future planting plan(s). Attachment: Site Map (Copy of Sheet SP-6) Sagarchi Property, 13089 Quito Road -Lot 6, Saratoga Page 3 oj3 City ojSaratoga Community Development Department !I 11 I _ \ Sife Addrcas: 13089 Quilo Rwd - Lo16. $antogt I ~ ODD 1 8AMT001~ CA 11 I I Prcotred tor: City of Stnto~ Community Developmem Deptnmem I ~M 81J1d>I~ ~~ lf~D 000 1 11 ~ I 1 Nons: Mtp idenrif2s I I bees of oraintna tiff. I LOT ArEM t2 ' I 11 Ctnopy perimeter tre tpprosimtu. I ~ 1 Mtp hts been reduced in siu tnd is nd f° tale. I . / I I 1~. Mty 28.2001 I TOTAL A~LRLAO~W AIEM 060 I ~ ~ 35'_'1• \ ~ I l fl0Y I -_\{ 1 -J \ \ .ea eF. I I 1 \ \ \ \ Q \ eLdf AT I ~'S'-0' 10'-7' \ ~ \ h- - - - - - - - -' - 588°OI'15';W - - - - - \\ - -I - - ~. 1 \ 1 I b 115.02' ~~ I ~ 1 ~ b ------ 1 18 ~ 4 I ~ 620 SF ~ ~I ~ I ; / ~ I I ' I ~ I ~ I ~'. ~. I ~ ~I I I I ~ `. ~ ~ i I 1 \\\ 17 ' ~.. X- ~I LOT 6 I / ~s'-0• 2 H PAD 1 1 /~ I ~\ / 1 , , 1 I ,~ I /YLOir2 LOT BF. ~ 0~, TYP. ~ 1 / ' / / I \ I ~ 1 ~s' 16 I ~~ I ~~ (R . i ~9 ~ 15 ~, .° i I '~14 '~ 'o . i I ~ ~ I , ~_, i ,- . ___ ~ ~~'~ L _ _ _ PROTECTIVE FENCING _ - _ - - - - - ~ I ~~ i I -. .' .~ ~ ~ `~ ~ ~, g,:~ ° ~ ~r 12 ~ ~ ~ ~~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ;' - ----------- ~ - ; ~i ; '1 ~ . , ~; ~ ` .. , ~, ~ ovele f \ ~- 19• rswD ~-_-_ ` _ SAVE -------_ _ i - _ / r~eP,red Ry: .~ ~ iM. r+, `? N ARBOR RESOURCES ',~ , v ivv© /'rnlr •rrnnrr/ ArAnr'i rxlfwrn/ I'nn. xlfiuy h 7'rrr f'nrr LOT ~k6 0 0 ~. ,,,n, . s n M~A~ (A . ~/, Plwrx. InSnI M+-??~I . Emil aroarmaurm n.ranMrM.na • Attachme~.t 4 ~~ ~~~~~ cis e ~~P OG~ ~ FIRE "` counrcar a u~nca •, FIRE DEPARTMENT SANTA CLARA COUNTY 14700 Winchester Blvd., Los Gatos, CA 95032-1818 (408) 378-4010 • (408) 378-9342 (fax) • www.sccfd.org • 04 1084 PLAN REVIEW NUMBER BLDG PERMfi NUMBER CONTROL NUMBER FlLE NUMBER 04'1 SZ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS CODE/SEC. I SHEET I NO.I REQUIREMENT SP-0 Review of a proposed 3,516 square foot single family residence with an attached garage. This review covers Lot #6. Review of this Developmental proposal is limited to acceptability of site access and water supply as they pertain to fire department operations, and shall not be construed as a substitute for formal plan review to determine compliance with adopted model codes. Prior to performing any work the applicant shall make application to, and receive from, the Building Department all applicable construction permits. I2 ~It is noted that the Site Plan does not appear to match the scale shown. • JFc appendix II-A Reduired Fire Flow: The fire flow for this project is 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. The required fire flow is available from area water mains and fire hydrant(s) which are spaced at the required spacing. Clry PLANS SPECS NEW RMDL AS OCCUPANCY CONST.TYPE ApplldntName DATE PAGE STG ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ KEITH ROYSTER ARCHITECTS 5/25/2004 1 of 3 SECJFLOOR AREA LOAD DESCRIPTION BY :OT 6 Residential Construction Hokanson, Wayne NAME OF PROJECT LOCATION SFR- SARGACHI 13089 Quito Rd Organized as the Santa Clara Countv Central Fire Protection District Serving Santa Clara County and the communities of Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos, ~ v~~ll ~~ Los Altos Hills. Los Gatos. Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, and Saratoga It is noted that the proposed new street will be identified as Dorcich Court. Please reflect that street name on all future applications. • cl~ e ~~P O~~ a `° FIRE '~ cou~f[sr ~ •e•vic[ CODEBEC. I SHEET NO. LJFC I 5 903.2 trFc 901.3 SMC 16-15.070 • uFc 902.2.2 ~~ FIRE DEPARTMENT SANTA CLARA COUNTY 14700 Winchester Blvd., Los Gatos, CA 95032-1818 (408) 378-4010 • (408) 378-9342 (fax) • www.sccfd.org • 04 1084 PLAN REVIEW NUMBER BLDG PERMIT NUMBER CONTROL NUMBER FlLE NUMBER 04'1 SZ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS REpU1REMENT Public Fire Hydrant(s) Required: Provide 1 public fire hydrant(s) at location(s) to be determined by the Fire Department and the San Jose Water Company. Hydrant(s) shall have a minimum single flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual, with spacing not to exceed 500 feet. Prior to applying for building permit, provide civil drawings reflecting all fire hydrants serving the site. To prevent building permit delays, the developer shall pay all required fees to the water company ASAP. Timine oaf Required Water Supply Installations: Installations of required fire service(s) and fire hydrant(s) shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department, prior to the start of framing or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested, and accepted. Garaee Fire Sprinkler System Required: An approved, automatic fire sprinkler system designed per National Fire Protection Association Standard #13D and local ordinances, shall be provided for the garage. To sure proper sprinkler operation, the garage shall have a smooth, flat, h izontal ceiling. A State of California licensed fire protection contractor shall ubmit three (3) sets of plans, calculations, a completed permit application and a propriate fees to this department for review and approval prior to beginning their work. Fire Apparatus (Engine) Access Roads Required: Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface, a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a maximum slope of 15°/O. Installations shall conform with Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications sheet A-1. Clly PLANS SPECS NEW RMDL AS OCCUPANCY CONST. TYPE AppllcanlNem• DATE PAGE STG ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ KEITH ROYSTER ARCHITECTS 5/25/2004 2 OF 3 SECJFLOOR AREA LOAD DESCRIPTION BY 6 Residential Construction Hokanson, Wayne Of PROJECT LOCATION SFR- SARGACHI 13089 Quito Rd Organized as the Santa Clara Central Fire Protection District Serving Santa Clara County and the communities of Campbell. Cupertinq Los Altos. Los Altos Hills. Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, and Saratoga C'1/'5,~,~~'a ~ a~-t;.l Attachment 5 • ~~ U ~~1.l~u ~ i AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) I, r ~ ~ ,being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years~t~hat acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the o~ ~ day of ~~c:r~C.~'~~ 2004, that I deposited in the United States Post Office within Santa Clara County, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to-wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) ~, that said ersons are the owners of said roe who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing p P P rty pursuant to Section 15-45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property to be affected by the application; that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. /~ Signed • ~~~~~~ • NOTICE OF HEARING BEFORE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF SARATOGA'S PLANNING COMMISSION announces the following public hearing on Wednesday, the 10th day of November at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, which are located in the Civic Theater at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Project details and plans are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Thursday, 7:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. If you have questions, on the project please direct them to Ann Welsh, Associate Planner, awelsh@saratoga.ca.us or 408-868-1230. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and ce. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a public hearing in court, you be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) descri din this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Saratoga Planning Commission at, or p ' r to, the public hearing. In order to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, wri communications should be filed on or before the Tuesday, a week before the meeting. APPLICATIONS #04-128,129, 130,131 & 132 (389-14-37) SAGARCHI, 13089 Quito Road - The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct five single family homes on the site of the former Dorcich Orchard which was approved for a six lot subdivision on 11/12/03. The proposed homes are designed to be compatible with the style of the historic farmhouse, which is being moved and restored on Lot 5. The homes are two story structures with a maximum height of 25 feet 6 inches. The floor area of the homes range in size from 3,366 square feet to 3,517 square feet. The property is in the R-1, 10,000 zoning district. The landscaping and Quito Road sound wall are also the subject of review. • ~~~ y~~ • In <D f~ CO O O r N M ~ O tD f~ op O O O <O I~ OO 01 O r N M ti In ~O ~ ~ t0 I~ CO O O ~- M M M M M tt ~ ~t ~ ~! ~~ ~~ '~ ~ O O O O O r r r r r r r N N N N N N M M c00 «~ M « ~ « ~ M M « ~ M M M M M M M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °v ~ °v ~ ~ d0 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r r r r TrT rTT r r r r r r r r r r r r r r TrT r r r r r r r r r r rTT r r r r' Z ~ ~ ~ ~ V/ VI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ VI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ VI aMMC~gMMM Mc~oMMMMC~MMMMMMMMCO~MMMMMMM~MeOOMMCOOM (O O Gp N r ~ O O p~ O Q~ O ~ In In (p r r (p r r ti Cp ~p M ~O lA lA -f~ M M M M N N N N N N N~ r r r r r r~ 0 0 0~ to In M~~~ '~T ~ O~ O O O N O N N N N N N N N N N r r r r r r f~ O (D (D ~O (D (C r t0 (O (O <O <C ~O ~O ~C I~ ~D tC tD ~O t0 tC tC ~O ~C t0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 a~ ~ ~ ~n ~n ~n ~n ~n to M O O ~ u7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ In v M N ~ ~ tc~ ~n ~ ~ ~ ~ IVrnrnwrnrna>rnrnrnwo~rno~rnrnrn o~rn rnC>rnrnv>~o~rnwa~rnwwwrnrn Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q p Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q to U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U m U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O Q Q Q Q Q N Q Q ~ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q fA Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q C~C7C~C~C~C~C~?C~C~C9C~C~OC~C~QC~C7 C9 C9 C9C~,C90C9C9C7C9UC9C9C7C9C9 0000000E-000OOQOOu.00000000~0000000000 HIQ-'HFQ-HQ'FQ-F'WQQQQQOQ~xQQN~Q~~~Q~~~~~~~~~~ ~,000QQQQ~QQQQQOQ~~Qa~'QQQQ OQQQQQaQQQQ U(n(nfn(n(nfAfnU(nfn(nfAfAJfgfnfnfn(nLL.fnf/)f~fn JlnfAfAlnfgf~fnfnfAl~ ~ Q Q Q Q Q 3 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL W O p p p p p p p p O p p p p p zzzzOZZZZZZZZZz gg~gg~~JQQaaaJaa Qa'~aggggQggg~~~ggg~ ZzZZZZ}ZZ~ZZ~z~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ w w w w w w~ w 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0~ 0 0 w O~ LL LL LL~ LL~~~ LL t Qi LL~~ tai ~~~~~~~~wwwww00ww'~ww>wUUUUaUUUUUUUUUU v~aaaaaaOC7popppxppc°v'ppWp~~~~Q~~~~~~~~~~ pNj N ~O O~ 00 N ~A M M O~ r h~ O In O~ O W ~D r r In M U O r t0 O OD N t0 O O ~. r O O (~ M O O M ~D Op O N~ x~ N r O GC CO Q1 r~~ lD 1~ <O ~ N r O CO ~O ~ CO ~ O ~ ~ O O ~ N ~ N O ~ O CD CC (O c0 1~ to O O O t0 ~A c0 <O t0 (O tD c0 cD 1A In Lf~ ~ 00 CO 00 OD OD 00 M O OD O O O O O O O O O O c0 00 00 00 oD 00 00 00 aD 00 00 CO ap OD 00 CD CO Q r r r r r r r N r r r r r In r r m r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r m _W a w Z W Y W J Z ~ J Q J Q O =W~ QW J p Q}WZ~IWU Q~ p ~ Z~~ Z 0 Q W U Q W~ W~ Q~} J Q W W Z ~~= QotSY I-pF-~ WQW WmfnO W Qo W ~ QJ~~f- 3a~ ~~w~JC~na~am~~ `~_ Q,a Q = ~H~Q~ °~wJ ~OO~s~~~~v~sJ =~sa Y ~V = UJZWJ~QWw~WQQ~U~' Q~WF-o~..~ OWWO ~ U otS ot3 JMC~-F-QQ=Vr a' ~'JF-JQ' ~QJ~ w~~~wY~ a~~~w=~z~~=YZm°a°a~JJ~ ~~-pZQ~~ ~ ~ }= Qzw U f-JQ QQZw ~ ~ Q= m a z Q Q O O Z °- ~ -v- ~~ Q m w~~ g w W Q~ 3 z= Q O~ Q o~ m= -~I-O W~ YZZ> °~O~ ~Y=ZZOppUJ WQcn pOU Q W~ JpQ~ Q WQ~~Jp~~wQQZF,~--=~QZU-~2lq~O~ W Q~W~ JWU~mp(n=QZQ~=WU'Wp2Y~pJHWp(nWWaZ~ NQQZw~U2~JZZZcn~O~~cnJp}zUU~Ow~zO JgZ=WO mWw~O~0000=Q>~~JQwwO~O~~~QOzmwQJOOQW~ ZYpU~mU' ~pU' UW WO(~WJIi(~~}ZmJmp~W WJ~~=mF-~p • NM~LALCI~O00~NM~t~NM LALDh0000~NM NLDI~GO~~Opp~O~pp~NM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~t ~ ~ sY ~ et ~ ~ ~ of ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t ~ ~ ap O CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 01 0 f~~ c~ M M M c 7~ L~ M M~ M M Lai ~ M M M LOS M M M M M M M M M cOO M M M M~ M M ~D 0 ~ _N N~~ N N~~ ~ M~ st ~~ O O M LA 0 to 0 0 LA I~ I~ I~ O N OO O CD ~ CO CO 0 0 0 0 0 r lA r ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ r 0 ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ N lA N N ~ ~ ~ lA r r O r r r tOLO I~1~ t00MCDOLOtD<OO CC LO CDf~LOCDI~OI~ ~cDtOCDN<Ot0NC0c0t0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O~ O O O O O O O O O O f~ 0 0 0 0 O f~ f~ 1~ I~ f~ f~ I~ I~ 1~ f~ I~ f~ 1~ I~ I~ f~ ~ f~ f~ I~ N f~ fppm 1pp~ fppm I~ I~ LA f~ I~ oMp 1pp~ 1pp~ I~ ~ ~ ~ tOA ~ ~ ~ LOA tOA ~ tOA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ LA LA LA ~ LOA ~ LOA ~ LA to LA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU W J Q Q Q Q J Q C~C~C9C7ZC9 OOOOOO Q ~' cai~ can can can 3 vai Q O O Q aQQQaQaQ oaQQ QaQ OUOODUOp X000 OUO OQOOOOO00 ~F-HH~H F- qF-gqgQs4GQqgg~ aQq~~ ~ Q Q Q Q Q Q~ Q = Q Q Q J Q Q cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn U cn cn cn C~ (~ cn O ~ ~ ~ Lg~ Lgg~ Q Q Q Q Q mmmm ~ ~ aQaQQQa UUUUUUU v Z W cap cap cap z cap cap N cap cap cap OOOWOOWO00 mmm~mm~mmm > U Q W ~ > Z >zQ»»»a»>~» > >~»> »°~»> »oo~QJ3Qa000QaaQQOQQOQOQOQaQ QQaQQa gQQ~~ Q~ QQQQQQC~QaQ~QQ~om}Q}}} }}_~~.~ ~zz ~=wo======o===w==o~oooooo~ooUOOo QO00O}I-dZF-F-F-I-~--F-F-F-F-F-YHH~Q f-U-UUULAUU~UUU U W W>>~ Q S J Q Q Q Q Q a~ Q a Q S Q Q S~ S U W U U U N U U U U U ~ D o d d ~ ~ -~ LL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d O d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ O M M ~J r' CO 0 0 ~ h O O CO _N c0 0 c0 N LA = M 0 ~ 1~ r' I~ m 0 K1 1~ N _O CO lD f~~OOmLOA~~c0c~0cD~LDLODLOACNO(0 LOA COOiDU ~O~LNN~LOA~OLNO~~cac0L0A CO 00 CO M M E GO ~ M Cp O a0 O CO CO O a0 O O H CO O M O M OD O O O CO O O~ O CD CO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- LD r' ~ N ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ N ~ r ~ ~ ~ r- N ~-- ~ ~ Q. r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W J ~- Q ~ W Q W W cn F- ~ ~ JJWm U Q wmcn J a:.,}~J ~ O Q ~z-W-~O~ waow~~Q wQw~O= >-' UY wZ WwmpY~cn ~z~--~-Q Q W=~z~w Qg «sW zz w»m-~.~ ~ Qcn>-_J z UmOQm zw F.J Ja WQ~w~JC~ QOZSUWS SW=Z~1-U Q l11 O ~-~~pOJaw cn~Q~~3Q OwvO~xs~s~ -~QwOv Q~ S~}oa,ty~°~O J~~~ojf~atf otS~otf=QH~W ~°tf,cyQ~~-~ ~w ~~~o~aQ~sw~WZ~~~a }~UQQw=av~Q~QZ} z ~ ~ Oaiz~wmQQ~gcw~QOQww3=~JwWoc~i~~QwoQ}z~Q~ z~~~}OQ~~Q3~~Q~a~WZa~~=Qa~~J~LL~U>Qg~~~ ~~ ~' O J~~ W~ 0 ~ Q ~ Z= m W 2= Q fn ~ Y Z~~ J J LL ~> Q (' m Qa= ~c~=wY~z~~F-~YV~-=cn~UQOWJazZa>-OOOp ?zz}~~~ zmOowOwwwwO~~Q~WQ=F-~p~Q ~cnz_~ =O =zUZOZO~wJCnm~m~~ Q-,z~ZUOZ~Q~~ J } Q W J~ g Q~~ Q W O Z S Q Q W W Q Q J a U~ lai W Q W O O~~ W~_~ 2~ N ~Iai20000a03c~nYOcnmJ>~~aQ3~Y}==-~Y~oUcnmaaU~~ • ~'~~ C, • to t0 to c0 I~ 00 O O r- N M d O cD f~ 0 d N tD I~ 00 0 O r cD 1~ 00 0 O r N M d to tD I~ 00 aa~~ r r r r r N N N N N N N N N 0 N 0 N 0 0 O c0 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 r r r r r O~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ O O O O 0 r r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M CO M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 'OC ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ VO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ 'OQ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ r M 000 r r O Ln 1n 00 0 d 0 0 M I~ r~ O~ ~~ 0~ (O d ~O d '~ 00 0 OD f~ f~ I~ 00 O O O O 0 r r In r M N 0 0 0 0~ r N r O r r r O r r f~ r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N M M N O N N O N ~D P f~ I~ I~ 1~ f~ O ~ O ~ h ~ ~ ~ d 1~ I~ I~ I~ I~ I~ I~ r' I~ 1~ 1~ f~ f~ I~ 00 1~ 00 0000000000 0010 00000000000000000 f~ f~ I~ f~ I~ 1~ f~ In f~ 1~ 1~ I~ I~ 1~ I~ In 1~ f~ f~ f~ 1~ 1~ 1~ I~ f~ I~ I~ 1po~ 1po~ I~ 1~ 00 Ipo~ ~j {~ ~ LOf~ t~ l~ l~ ~ ~ LO LL~ 11~ l~ lO lO In LOA IOC ll~ l~ 10A lOA l~ LLO LL~ l~ l~ tt~ tf~ ~ ~ ~ ltd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U v U Z Q Q Q U Q a Q Q g Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q ~ Q Q C7 C9 C9 Z C7 C~ C9 C7 C9 C7 C9 C9 C9 W C7 C9 W C9 ~ Z C~ C~ 000 0000~oooooNoo~o Qoo ~a~a~az~~~agz~~~~~az~~z~zw~aga Q Q Q Q Q Q Q a a Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O J Q Q ~cncncncncncncncncnv~cnv~cncnu~cncncn~aUU u Z _ ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ Q Q Q ~~ Q' ~>~~~ O~~ ~ N U Z Z Jam} }}0-H~~QF-F-F-cnF-F-dF-~Z(llcn X001-000 W ~O~~~F~~i.~~~~~ U H U U U U H Q N Q O Q Q Q~ Q Q~ Q M m W W U~UWUU~~z3J~3~~3~ 3X~JJ g(~~O~~dc~wcnOcnc~v~~~triXCAO~UU O O M a ~O ~ 00 0 tD (D d~ M N Z 0 00 m O m 0 M N NN~Md d•-d d dMdd dtOMMOdOf~dd M M c0 0 0 M 00 r- 0 M 00 00 00 r 00 00 00 O 00 CO r r r 0 r r r r N r r r r r 0 r r Q, r d r r r W W Q ~~ a m}~~ H H w ~ ~ ~LLwa ~ ~ W Q ~ ~ ~ ~ = C~°~O~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J ot3 ~ U~~~ O~ W W a ~S ~~ O Z Q Y~~~ Z 2 V~ O m~~ Y Z> ~zazw~~QO~ >OJa~~C=')~ZZ OtnaC_~=O ~~ c~7s~c=i~~m~~a m Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q ~ Q C7 C7 , C7 C7 C7 C7 (9 (9 C9 C9 C9 C9 Q C9 00 0000000000 a4~a ~~a~a~~a~~a~a~azag as aaaaaaaaa~a mm ~~~~~~~~~~~ N w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ Q D O ~ > > > > Q Q Q Q} J J J J J J J J zzzz~mmmm~mm m OOOOW~~~~LL'~~~~ (n (q (q (n - W W W W F-' W W ~A W ~~~~ZppppZppaop W W W W Z Z Z Z Z~ Z Z~ Z J J J J O Q Q Q Q O Q Q Q U U U U ~ > > > > m > > X > OON M f07 N~00000Nmd d d d d M d d d M N O 0~0! 0000000 M 00 00 00 00 0 r r r r r r r r r r r r d r = W J Q W U ~ '~ ~ a W W "'~ ? W WAN W ~ ~ U Z ~ ~ ~ W ~ U - W ~ W W ~ --~ otS W W (n ~ Q ~ I-WwZ Q U >~H ~ Q W H O ~ ZQ 3 W~? '~ ~~ Z ~ Z C~==m W=JLL Q°'~0~ J Q~Qiy Q W W~~ m Q Q O~~~ w 0~~ Q~ J Z}~ W 2 «y~~Zw~ }~(g~}~ W~QlA W ~C9a WN JJ=QU~N wLLOQQWZWmW_UQW~°tSYQ JtL ~ W U~~ Q Q LL Q = 3~> m Q~ Z Q W Z} C O Q QZ~QQC~= Jots JZQUZ WO~mQ~ JLLC7Q..Q~~2 ~~wnm.~QZQZ=>~=Z~=z~z>-LLaw>aQQ fn Q~ O~~ J> LL~ Z m~ J m~ O~~ ~ W J ~? W~ 3 ~UW=LLJ~'~ JQ ~JW O~ 2-pdJZ~ pU~cn~wao~~=~a0~^-Q=Q?U2~aQQQ =~ammc~~Q~c~~YC~cnLL~3ULLJCna-~~cn~cn OOH NtntOf~OOOON ~ N N N N N N N N M~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O M ti N N N N N N N N N N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '~t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t ~ ~f of ~ r N O ~ ~ N N~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O .~-000 0000 a a a a a a a a a a a U U U U U U U U U U U aaaa aaaa Wc9c~c9c~ c~c~c7c9W U0000 OOOOU O F QQ- QQ HQ HQ Z F-- FQQ- F QQ- F QQ O Q Q Q Q Q~ Q Q Q Q Q UUUUUmUUUUU I- ~ ~ Z M O J J a~ a ~~ ~ ~' 0 C~mZ~0~~0~W ~~ Q W~ W W W W I v W W U~ a»» a ~ ~ ~~ 0 7 ~ ~ 0 ~ -~ ~ Z Z W~ ~~~~~ a ~ Q a J~ Z>>>> W x>>Ua aaaa= m c00 00 O~ O~ M N O N ~ of ~ ~ c0 ~ ~ ~ ~ N O 00 00 00 a0 O CO CO oD o0 O w V ~ a ~ ~ a a Q Z W ~ Z W J ~ ~ ~ ~ C7 ~ W O a Z~ H O Q~ H J ,~ ~ U 2 otf ot3 ~ C7 Z W Z -~ .~ ~ Wppv''j~rs~w U .J°tSWOJ~Wf-~Z ~ >w~ JW WLL!!1_Wa(n>QW >?Wa2u'aWNZZ ~a~Q~~QZ>=O a~~cn2c~wawU>- ~ ~, ~ ~v~~ • • Attachment 6 Salim Sagarchi SEI Corporation 14524 Oak Street Saratoga, CA 95070 October 4, 2004 Ms. Ann Welsh Assistant Planner, AICP City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 Dear Ann, Regarding the neighborhood meeting requested by the Planning Commission, we would like to inform you that after a couple of attempts, we were able to meet with the neighbors to review the final construction plans on May 8, 2004. many attempts were made to contact the neighbors via phone and fliers. With the a ception of two, all other immediate neighbors were present at the meeting. During this meeting the construction plans were presented to th neighbors and the elevation and design details were reviewed. All who were present approved these plans unanimously and signed the "Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application" which was submitted to you already. They were also anxious for us to start and finish this project ASAP, as the finished project would add value to the neighborhood. There were several attempts made to meet with one of the two immediate neighbors that were not present at the meeting. Several phone calls, personal meetings requests at his house, invitation to the neighborhood meetings, and visits to his residence have failed to get him to review our plans. These plans were changed due to his personal requests during the planning commission meeting and afterwards. He refused to show up in 4 pre- agreed meeting dates, never returned more than 10 voicemails, and refused to attend the last two meetings. Best Regards, Salim Sagarchi • ~~~~~~~ Open House Invitation Sunday, May 6, 2004 E: I30St: SEI Enterprise Location: Dorcich Orchard, 13089 Quito Road, in Saratoga Time: Thursday Mat 6, from 5:00 to ~ 7:00 pm. ~I' Please come and review our development plans. Meet the developers, ask them questions, check out the detailed plans and give them your feedback. C: ~~~~~ Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Ouito Road, Saratoga. CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not loo~E favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta, fj"and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the Ci of Saratoga. My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I nderstand the scope of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Name: ~--~ ~.,,i-~.r, i ~ ~~~0~ ;/ Neighbor Address: 18 5"5~ m~.-~.~~,,. ~~ ~~. ~ Signature: Neighbor Phone #: `'l d $ " 3 7 9- ~' ~~/ Printed: • • ~~~~~~ ('itv n{,4arntnva PlnnninQ 1)enartment • r ~_ r~ Neigbbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: _ 13089 Quito Road, Saratoga, CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta, fJ''and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may rese a the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City aratoga My signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any conce or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):, Neighbor Name: ~ ~~ " ~ h ~~~'~- & o ' Y L~ Neighbor Address: 'j ~ 'r '~ ~ ~i fs 12 ~1. S a ro-.fo qa , C/~ ~ Sb 7 v Neighbor Phone #: CJ~ 08~ 3 70 ' Printed: C ~7~. - i K. L,~ vl, ~~~ ~~~ Planninv nennrtment ('rtv nf.Carntnvn Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Ouito Road Saratoga. CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Stajj"and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative ofoll residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the ,C__it//y of Saratoga. L~dMy signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any conce or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):, (~ Neighbor Phone #: ~ ~(i,~ ,/ ~ J ~o~~fi ~/~~~ • ~~~~~~4 (.'itv nf,Carntnva Plnnninv nennrtment Neighbor Address: Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Quito Road, Saratoga, CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the- evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not loo~E favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. StafJ'and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative ofall residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewe' the project plans; I understand the scope of work and I do NOT have any conce or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h 'ng on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. ~ ;~ C Neighbor Name: ~~ ~--~f~+~ ~ IJPM.~ Ji v~'~-vv~''~S , Neighbor Address: Is~~a M~~.~<<~~ ~- a~r; C~ 9 ~o ~o Signature: .r v n . arntnQa Neighbor Phone #: ~~~ - ~~d ' ~ U~ / Printed: 1 c,.c, Tc. f~ • ~-z- l ~~ ~~, t/ ~ ~' ~t rv~ --~,- is Plnnninc nenartment ;~ ~ ~'~' R Neigbbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Ouito Road. Saratoga. CA Applicant Name: SE1 Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta, fj"and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative ofall residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City f Saratoga. signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Name: Neighbor Address: 1 ~5~/O~~y ~ /~~ T ~ CA ~.5 ~ Signature: ~ ~ // 9 7 c Neighbor Phone #: 7~0 ~/ / ~-'~ Printed: /t~¢J- V~L~~EZ ~~~ ~~~ • • • ('itv nf.4arntnva Plnnninv nennrtment Neighbor Notification Template for Development Application Date: ~. Z ~(- oy PROJECT ADDRESS: 13089 Quito Road. Saratoga, CA Applicant Name: SEI Enterprise Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta~"and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City o Saratoga. y signature below certifies the following: I have revie the project plans; I S understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any eonee or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant prior to the City's public h ~ 'ng on the proposed project. ^ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary):. Neighbor Name: ~~~t ~ C~ ~ ~1 C ('l r ~~~1.y 1 Neighbor Address: ~' ~ ' ' l ~ ~ ~ S ~~ v Neighbor Phone #: ~ ? 0 - ~S ~~ • Signature:~"~ Printed: / 1 L~ ('itv n1'.Girntnva ?,~titi~~ ~,~~~ ~ 1110 ~~~ PlnnninQ nenartment • xvJ LLrQ'IIrL'OIY I~1 LLri'I~L'Oli O~irr Y7 '~IiIVMaN •anv Nosia~aao~ IO~i vlv 'a~ataaoal Mlla~l S10311H0l~d ~13LSJ10~ H.U~~I LEO-~146BE ~NdV b~ ``dJ01~1`dS a`d0l~ O.Uf1O 680EL-~I-I')d0 H~I'~Oa Inds weds 9# 101 ~Sf10H MAN I~JU LJ u ~ U O ~ ~ ~U 0 Q U ~ ~ O ~ o p a ~~ rf O T~ n ~+ ~ ~ I ~~ u 'fv p ., ~~ Z ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ a~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ o ~ u~~ ~g~ ~~ } x~ u Zz~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ o _ .~ ~~ ~ ~ y ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ r ~ ~~~ ~ Y ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ o ~ o~ o ~~ ~•~ ~.~~ ~ o~ ~~o~ ~ a ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ - O ~ ~ _ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 Z ~ ~~z ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ W ~~ _~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ _ n a ~t n ~ r } _ ~ ~~ .~ p~_ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~F~ ~ o ~~ ~ x: ~ ~~ 0 W ~ O ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~. Y O FF~F ~ 88888 888~~ nnnn~, ~~~ 3 ~r ~ ~~~~ w -~9 q-~!` w - ~~~`~ o ~~ ~ ~~_~_~~~ ~~~~~ U ~ ~ ~uuuuu ~ ~ ~ ~~ ag ~ ~ ~a Z o ~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~ z =~ s~ 99~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~a~a~ ~~ ~ ASS ~~~~~~~~ ~~~ G ~ 5 c, '., ,,. ,-rser~ M; ~~ U a: a • n N _I l1') //--~~ ~ Q ~ ~ D~U ~ ZY^O^ ~ I.~L ~ J O~ O m ~'.-QI~~ ~ O m '~F . . J t[~ V) O~ ~ V (D M } m D W S O a 0 a 0 iN 1 ,. `mot .~.1 I `7 ~ ~ ~ ;'; I i g ~ ~, , o 4 , ~ °___` ~ 1 M 1 ca 1 \ . i ~ ~~ I W 1- ~ ~J I ' CI V ~ ~~ N ;. >- ~ I~ N 1 1 ~ ~ I ~ ~. _____ ~ 51 '3~n•d .oF ~~ o III I I i I~ ~ I t< I I I 1 1 I I (~'.' I `- I ~ ~f7 tD w 1 z r--- ~ 8i ~: ~~ f"-` z 'I p ~ ~ ~ S i` I 1 ' yJ m -~--~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y .~-13 ~i ~ ~ I ~ i ` ~ ~I - ' AMO,L t ~,1 v. •'~ a'n•d ,oF ri cn 1 ~i a a z w ~_ n! rj >'~ VZ c k .° ~~ G~ 1 1 -- ~ ~ a ¢t a a ~a ~~ ca ~~ ~,; Vi ~ ~ "- ~ a a m ~~ h ~ I '~I .ZL ' 'a7tlVA` ~~ %~a~/ ~ Ld ~\ ~-. I ~ ~ v ~ ~-~ ~ j i ~~ ~ ` 1 ~ i ~ '~ U ~ ' ) ~ j O ~ v O 1 ~... ~ r' Q ~ i a- \' ~ ~-__- ~ r r 0. ~ 1 ~} ~ 4i , ~ ( ~ .e ~ ~ ~ r- ~- -~-- l ~ - __._ _ ~ I E ~o y ` ~ i ~.:, ~ ~ ~ m ' ~`c~ia a IS' n ,ice gi ~ ~ ~~,~ Jw I "ter I ~ ~"~~- ~ c` -w _ ., i ~ ? 4 4' I ~ ;wW ~ Z y' a. ~ ~ I t'z + 4 ' U ~ a 0 (~~ ¢' iU C 1~+ 3 d f> L~ O S _~`'4•~ ~ V ~~ N .-. G .~ SN '-~ 1 r N wr^. W o i3 G~ ~. r a i ~ a ~~ ~ ~q ~t .a 43 r ~ xp ~ i N i ~ y f' ~Y ~ t v~ F- , Z I ~ ___..~ .. 3 '. F '-~ ~ ~ Y W V { a u~ ~c ~ ~ w F I I --~~=~"i- "I I I ,~Z I I . ~~ _ ._` p i c I IY V 1 :, ~ ,6 n n ~ , m 1 {-_-~i._.._.-.. f ~~8 ....... ~ L] I ~; ~~ t ~ s `_ ~ ~ _ _~ , O 7 C7 ~ ~ ~ i .- i ~ t ~' _..._ ~, ~~ Yl NIWD .4' .6y i ~ I ~' t~6 ~ 1 i I r .` ~ • ~- D \ f I - I ~ _._.__M ~.,, I y I T~ ct,ttl ! .._._._. 00'41.f'L+' ~ cj^a- .a~ ~,°"_ ~ j w tIi b i'` 1 .y' ~. - ._ ~ h + f C r n 1/ ~ 1 rn ~ ~ }j V ' ~ F .. N Ll 1 \ :,SA~ (~'~ A'~, ~ ~'' F ~' c ~ \ I~I ~ A... ~" ~ ~„ ~ a I 7f, ,~^` I f~.J ~ ' `-s~ ° Lir ~ ~; ~',N ~; t'' I \ ~'~ iv ~ / i ~\' z \ `a ~ o -fir , .. i . ~ ~.GZ .~_....i j-.__-.__ a .'~~. "' ~n.~~-._-_...-.-- r._... 265+9~ !9 i ~ I !.~ I ~, ~~ 1 i f ~ ~ o W _ _ ~ ' I ( W j ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~i i ';~ ~~ -~ -T''--'-- ~;~ ~ 1 \ 4 ~ r, ~ ~% ap `~ ~ry " °D ~ ~ °° ,~- -- '-'^ iY,) ;~_~ 1,\ F- ~" _; k I Q 'r I ~ _ E - ~, - ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ • • Q U 1 1 ~ 1 W aJ -' 1 z •T,i s' 7; L~ , m~y~y LL ~~ a' 1 t- ~ OK !~ a <. ~ a m ~ {a ~ ~~ ~ i~ ~~ ~.~ ~, - ~~ ~r u m ~-~ y ~ 1 ~ ~-~~ Si WA' "tom ~,~ ~' ~ `~ ~~ ~" I Q Y 1 ~ j ~1 Nl; I N E ER .~~'~~ ,..,., i~~ ~'; ., i ti / -cr ~ ,,,~ y ~; ~~-a ~ ~ 4v 1, tT I v i I ~ , ~ i `I~\ ~ /~ I .1i Z 1 C ~~~, 1.S f 9 ;,.,.~ _ ? i ~. i I ~?~ v ~~~.~.. - ~ s._:: LJ~ 4 p-,+', z LL, lC o ~, ~ _ ~a 1~ i ~ ~ ~ -- - ~ ~ 1 r ~~ ~ I H i^ ,,, I 1 s 1 @ 'z ~«' i J;-.y it I a R am ~~~ ~ C ai ~4 , -. 1 aWd :Y ~U ](io c ~ T ry~ ~w IL n 1 _. _. W r7 C"+ a z _ ~_. < ~ ~ Z it ~a G G ~~ Q: ~ :J m ~,;~~ (L ~ ~~> G ~r~ ~~~Ig o ~ i ~ i-' ~ ~. n ~ Ez ~ a ~ Yq _~ -. U ~ S~ W ~ Vi CS ~ ~ W ~ 9 G~i ~ a U' ~ FF W e VC r ~ 3 ~ O G'J '^ 6 . - [ ~ M M J 11') ~aQ '~ wOV ~ O ~ ~ ZYO ~ d ~ J O O m ~ r Q'~Qnv ~Omd' J to (n ~ d } m D W O a. O a 0 Z ~~ ~/ ~ (""` ~ ~ I ~ <y 1 J ~.-_ I ~ ~ ~ J ~l~ I ~~; e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i c~. .~ I ~' ~~ ~ l" ~ $ w if ~ o o N ~' ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ .. ~ ' ~ i "> I ~ ~ ----.~ \4V t I `~ ~ I \ ~- I~1 j ~ i fU, I i ~i ~~ I ~ ~ ~I I N ,~ ~ go { % ~ I I ~- N N ~ / `~ ~I '3'n'd Al ~r _ ~ o I ^ ~ ~1 ! I ~I I m I lIl131Y1 ANV1MfV5 i I I iz' I ~ <t I tD I ~. ~ ~ 1 I.~ ~ ~~.~ , ~ ~ ' ~~~ I ; ~;o~ + fi +I cn ~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~„ ,:; u ~ ~• + I 0~ Sv 11 _ ~ ' C~ ' n .,i,~0.8ti5 _ , ~j ~ I Mr ~ i ~ ~ ~n ~ --- ~~~~ ~ , 6~ 9 i _- - - - __-. -.._r-+- any ,_~~ ~, r, ~ i . 1 _ ~ ~' h-- ~d~ i ~ ~ ~~~ ~! i ~ -- ~- - -_. ~~ ,. ~ j ! a~..V~S i LW ~ ~ ~ .~ ;~ ' ~ <Z a 1 , ~+ ._ - t _ _ _ c~ ~ I ~ ~ / -. _-- _ ____.___ I _. _--~_ ~,s , ~ -"i ~ ~Yl NIIk9 .4- ,BS I ~I U I ', o ~ ~I i i C ~ ~.. i ,5 1 j ~ "- ;.~.. ~,, _~__=~,I ~ I ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ _i_ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ,~ I n z_ - rn o -. o ~~ 1'- 1 . N I ~ ~` + SA1~4 r v_ i ~ `. _ s F- ~ ~ 1 ~~') ~ ~ -.`,~ ~ A f ~, \ y„~~ w' ~ o CSI • '~~ ;'~~ _ s ~1 i ~s ~~,~" i; I o ,~\\~~ ~, ~I s a, ~~ Z ~ _. a i I ---- ~- ~ -,~'`I- i -- _~ ~_ ____ _ I ~ py`E,'~ ~ \~q~ '+~Y 3 31V ~ ~ r'.~~~ i ~ ~ ~~` p oo p ~~~~~ 1~ ~ ~>>,. l ~ ~" l{ M i <; k ~r. ` f ` ` t iY t 1 I ~~ -. i ,~ i,`? i i [`f ' ~` f M i I ~~~ ~ r J ~~ • ,rl~- ~` •~ ~ d~ `Ol'ds $ ~ € .- ~, • I m 1 5 ~~ 1 - _~ ~, r 1 ~ 1 ~ ~~ N I F Z ~ ~i r ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ 1 ~~ x - I - c~ ~ ~ ~ Y Z i ' ~ >~ F~ ~ I g s 1 ~< 3 ~I ~ It I 1' I ~ f~ ~ ~j , ~ 11 I / ~f / j1 I ~ 1 11 I / !~ i I 1 11 ~i ~ ~~ ,, us xx~s X3J ~ Ili / ~ ~vu I I 11 i ~~ / Q~O % i (~ tyro to-eos ~ ~m 3sra ~ I I 1 ~ I I 1 1 ~1 I I ~~~ cry' ~// ia3no~ a bro-Ito-e9r ~ us 3ra x3 ~ I 1 t R 1 ozo-ezo-to- %~~~ P // ~~~ x3 S~FSZ=' .SI,tQ N - --~ ~ ° L L -- _ _I 1 '~ ii I ~ ~ iii / \ / / ~ ,' ~~' /~F, `J /fl~~/\\, `~ `~ 3~ sly ~~ ` \ /1 /\ 1 i j ~ ~~~ P I /_l \ / 1 / / \ n cn ~ j ~ ~ tz0-BLO-fOY ~ I I o ~ g `~ ~~ `~ ~ J I W 11 ~ FoN~ Yet I `J /-~'/ ~~~/\ ~J /\`~~/~ e\~ \~ /\ /\ I;~ ~ + ~ 3 r•- _ ~ / \ / \ \F~ ~ 11 I n° _ + '° -~' 9Z g~$gIV I EL~376 ~ " 1 I I 1 'S'$ i \ \ - I .~ M„!mot-, .Les/ L- ~ ~ ~ zzo-eLO-roe t ~ ~~ \J ` \ ~ Lam, I~' ^.~^m /~ \~ / ~ of 1 ~ \`~~ ~ ~ X11 ~. ' I ~~ ~ 1 I ~ a3MS ~ ~ J/ /J l J ~~'r 1 I ~ ~ / / `J °: ~ j j ?'moo i ~ sHCt sn ~ \ / 1 \ L - - •Po•t ~ l ~ I EL~379.47 I I ~ • l1h \ ~ l J l \ ~ 1 ~~ / ~J /\\J ~ tTs~l I ~ I ~'n ~ /~ /\ \ / 1 I I ~i o ~ /\ ,to'stt .bo4sises -- ~ - /1 1 ~ `J ~' 1 I' ~ s o~ ~ / .- ~ r 1 • 1 ~ ~ ^ ~ I I `~ i ' ~ ~ A OZO-L LO-fQr /~~ ~^/ °I • ~ CQ VVV~i f ~ \ ~ F- / / p \ I I I ~ ' - II~ ~O ~ ~ I 3 ~ I O ~ ~• ~ ~ ~~ •~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 I • ~ `/ ZS ` ~ ~- I 1 I ~ ~ / \ rn ~ 1 \ / 1 1 O to ~ / / ;~ ~ - ~ O • : ' Y' I •- N ~ J ~ / \ J ` I I d ~ lZ0-LZO-f Of '~/ ' t \ -- ~ ---- -- _- =~~ ~I ~- ~ ~- _ - s ~ \ I a I LZO-LZO-fOt Y I 7~^ ~ I ~° I Lso--tiro-eae 1 r ~ - - - - I----- ~` ~ ~ / I ~~ ~ ~" 1 I 18L'0-ri0~t I - ~- - -I . _ _ ~~ a ~nw n $t~ I t -~-- - --~ 2 0 ' ~ - ~ I I I I 090-110-68£' - - \ \ ~- ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ . _ - I I .-1- I ----`--_ Ili ~ ALS 7JNS 'K3 1 I ~ BSO-i t0-68f I 11 I us x~rs x, ~ t 1 m '~ 1 I I lrLL'+3063a I I uS '0~ 'X3 I ~ 1 ~ W 1 I ~ I I I I ~ ~ I I i ~ - I ~ I l I 1 I I I I I g 1 ~ ~ ' - I I W I 1) 1 - b00t B~:E0:9: (: :70 ~'qi !~+7-~f•i1A"~ieCC?o:i~d-01':Y\Q~S\a9Q'1; • xo~ Lirs•1r~.•oIS ~d0 `~Ol~HdS a ~ O i .l i~ r s •i ~ ~ •o i s LEO-~l4$8~ #~Ndd ~~, •a n v N oii >ti a a o y ~i v s s Ot/Od OllflO 680£l-dddHO~IO HI~IJI~Oa - 'Ild 11a1iA011 Mlla)1 "' IH~JdS YW'1dS `rLL ti _. - ~ (n S10~11H0~1`d ,,1 U z ,, ~Sf10H MAN ~'~ •` ~131SJ10~ I-W~~I I i i i i i I i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I i I i i ~ i I i i I _._.~._._._._._i_._._._.- _._._._._.L.._._._._._~._._._._._ _._.~ ` OYOY 011110 r - - - - I ~~ ~ i 5~ I I ~ I I ~ I I ~ I - r. aoa. ~I I ~I t I I I I I i I ~. _ I _.~ ~4~ --~_ ~ \`\ •~~ ~ ~~ `~ °+z E \` 1`,'1 ~ J 1~ ~~~ I I I al I I I ,LOCI I I I gR I I I l i s `a ,_ I I I I i I I I ~- - I I I I I I I ~- - I I z I a a I u I U. I C I U, U. ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ I _~ ~~~--_ - _ ~ ~ ~ - xvJ L~f~'Ir~•ols I•t ~~fs•IrL•ol~ o1i-r tiro '~11~/MaN 'aN`I NO/liliCOil IOIf vlv 11ai~~-oa~ Nila~l S1031JHO~Id ~~1S~10~1 HJJ~~I b~ `v~oi~ros adob ono ssoa-a~~ao Boa ;~ ~_ L,__ - i' ~ N 1 - 910~ ~SfIOH MAN - ql~ it ~ ~ -' ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ,_ ," ~ °'`~:~~_ ~- 0 J .__I I I r! i ~ i ~I i ~ ~ ~~ i ~~ i .~ r ~ i '~ ~ I z i,; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I Y ~ ~ ~ xoJ L114'IrL'Oli 1 •1 L L ~: •I r L •0 1 s L~.'0-ti10-68~' fNd~/ bJ `drJO1~IdS O~irr YO ')111rIMiN t * ~f - ~ 'a ~ v N o a 1 al a o o al I Q 1 i ~Od 011(10 680E1-•dHt/HJNO ~~ ~. T V I V 71i1i~L011 Mlli~l IHJH~~dS YVf1dS ~,~ ~ ~ ~ o Q SlO~lIHOl~d ~~> ~~ ~131SJ10~ H.U~~I 9101 ~S(lOH MAN ~ - _h_ r w~.r_~.. 3 ~~ _ 1 F ~ d ?99 a I I t I --~- ~~~ Q~ - - -~ ~~ 4 r ~; ~w.. ~ _ ~ _ _ _ _ ~ J ~. ~G ~s 910G ~~ ~r _ A~ xxxXx X~~r~M ®6000 • ~g ~~ • `~ VAJ 1 `/ xor LLt~i'IrL'Oli I• 1 L l f i 'I Ir L 'O I s LEO-1~0-68E TIRO Y ~~! ~l 1/ O Y S - ~ ~ - o~if~ 'V7 '~Ia1V/MiN ' ~ ` `f °A a n v N o s i ti s a o al I Q I i 'II`I ylal~AOal Nlla~l ~/OH OlJ(10 690E4-~Idl~l~0 F~ ,~ tT` N C ~ S10311HO~Ib II"I~I~. t1S YVI"IdS ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ I z < ~131SJ10~1 H1J~~1 9 101 ~Sf10H MAN ,> ~~ _ W 4 W y >~ x x x x x h16~61N ©®~ -, J C ~I r~ VJ ~"' `/ {.L 8 I~ xo~ i~ra•ir~.•ota - ~ i• l i~ r s •t r L •o ~ s LEO-X10-68~ fNdt/ ~/J `~/rJOl~l`dS •a ~ r N `o's i a~i a'a o ~ ~ "o i : ~Od 011f l0 680E1 F~:OIJ~104 ~,~ ~ ~'~L~ ~ ~ ~ ~ viv 71a1~doti Mlli~i S10311H0l~d i~:~ds wrn-s ~f ~ ' ~ o i ~ ~131SJ10~1 H1J~~1 9101 ~Sf10H MAN ~` - ~ Q 1 xo~ itf,i•Irr.•ol>a I.1 ~ ~ r ~ •I ~ ~ •o I s LEO-til0-68E fNdd bJ `brJ01~1`ds o ~ ~ r ~ ,r o ~ >r r M a H QyON 011f1U 680E1-dN~H~10 H~OO ~ .~ ~ ~f~ ~ d. 'IIY 11al~.loi1 Mlla~l S1O~11H0l~d ~~roods wrn-s ~,~ ~ ~~ ~ Z i ~ ~131SJ10~i H.U~~I 910 ~Sf10H MAN - W Q W 1 -~1 x • ~ I. I. f s •I r 1. -o l a bJ `V~JOl~HbS ~ - I • 1 L L f i •1 r 1. •o i s LEO-~10-68~ fNdt/ O~ifr Y7 '~111`rMaN ~t ~ `f _ m •a n v rl o s i >r a a o >r 1 v r s ~/Od O,Lnp 680E-~Id~„ ~Ol10 V I V llalidOil Mlla~l ~ ~ ~ ~/1 II-K~lbrcJdS WI'1b~S ~ ~ ~~ J S103UHO~Id 9101 ~ ~'' ~'~ - Q ~131SJ10~1 H.U~~I Sf10H MAN ~ }~ xv,1 LL1'S'IYL'OIS ~ f I •1 L L ~ s •I r L •o I ~ LEO-~t4-68E iNdV ~~,,/ ~~y_~~~,,/ub^~~`d'J0111N~/3 'i N V NOS 111 i' O 11 `I f S f ~,1 Y~ O~~ VoVVF-Va V 1'1~1~V ~ ~ rf~ _ `i/l`I 11i1SJ~0il Mlli)I ~ ~ IH~NMJdS WI"i`dS ~ ' ~ S10~11H0~ld ~~ , s~~ _ aC S~S~O~ ~~~ 9101 ~Sf10H MAN W +, ~s ,~ u a o c~..,c~ P'COo o c °a °°«`e ~ c v •c g~pr~;'s ~~ ~rL~ O O C V ~" O °o P L..s oooo=a~ << «o ~•~POO;~ O nto 3 ~~ a eco ~•€ a;s~$= tt_~~wo r-~o~n~a ~ J ~ S O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_`i 6 O ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~~ ~ ~ S O to ~ d O m ~' a' d O (~ ~ u ~ °' o °' ~' n~ _ £ ~ ~ ~ v ' W d m J o In ~ -~ s. a -~ u ~ £ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ; 4 n, O d O L U ~ d U ~ U ~' O N~ ~ a ~ ~ L ±' Q O L d Q O ~ O U1 0 ~ 0 ~,4 o a o~ vl n. u +-~ ~d ~ ~ u ~ a d u ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ a-~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ U ~ - Q L7 (~ ~ ~~ L ~ U+' U~~ W -~ ~ i L ~ ~ In ~ ~, n, d_~ ~ o ~ ~ v i a , n > aS _ ~ Q ~ ~ U ~ Q I ~ d 0 + ~ v, 1 5~ I +' +' ~ l~no~ HSIS~JOQ 7 Sl~~ SNld~d ~dIdSSQNd~ v 0 \C Y i = F- c Q a g ~ ~ _ w ~ U ~~ ~- a = ~~ U VI A r-, U m ~ ~ ~ a A ~ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- --- -- 1 g ~ ~ \1 / ~ ~ _~ ~:,~ ~~ / `\ \ \ ~aasaaaaaa~ _~~ _ r~~\ ~ X W ~~ ~ x W l ~\ \ \ \ \ \ \ I ~ Z i \ ~ \ ~\ ~ ~~ ~\ ~ / ~1_v~ r L~ F ~~ I ~ I Il 1 I ``` ~ x W ~~ 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ 1 II I ice ~~1 ~ II I I / ~* ~IWI~~ II ~ I I I 1 J / ~~/ ~3~1 II I II I J I ~ ~ X-li' " w 1 I I I ~ I 1 1 ~ I I I I ~ `~ I b. 1 3~ I I ' ~ ~ ~ 7 Q C., ~ ~ I I i ~ I ~w I I z I ~ ~ a QI I ~ ~ I z ( < a F ~ ~ W ~ I I 1 ¢ ~ I I I 3 1 ~ W ? ~ I ~ (n p J I g 3 I S < I I i W o < ` ~ Z ~ ~ < ~ ~ < ~ > o O Opp I ¢ Y ~ O I Z~~ ~ ~ I ? I I I I ~ _ ~ ~ < 1 ~ v~ Z p < (D ~ N a ~ c~ O a o ~ ~ I m 3 1 I ~ I 1 1 C3 ~ ~ ~ ~ I ti N 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~n 1 j I j j I ri I~ 1 .~ r m 1 n a I ' I I I n ro I m mw x I w { 1 J J ) I I I 1 ~ ~ I I I Q s 3 I ~ I I I I w I I I I N W Q I I I I I I ~~ U \ ) f I 1 act = ~ E 3 \ ,~.( `lJ / 1 ~ I I I 1 t4 EL ° ., NhAVI ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I II > ~ 11 II ~ II s II II 11 II h t~. W` h Y ~ ¢o W RI ~ Y ~ O Ep II I I I I 1 1 h h Z II ~' J ~jOW~ h ~ ~ ~Q ~l7 ` ~HD..WaV Z lW7D 7 d ~ m ~ N I w I I I I ~6 . ~1 Ind gN JR7 II • • • 3J ~~~G~ ~~~~d Q3~ 3 rN~ ~R ~ ^ * ~ ~ G J ~ ~ . S ~ . o J W _ . x_, ~ o ~ YC ~~ ~ ~ k /p~ ~ F ~... ~ ~ ~-- - a° a ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~.~ - ~ ~ ~ p ~... b~.w ; S C ~ ~~ ~ ~ Y_ ~•.. g~~ b F ~' g ~.- ~ ~ ~ ~\ - a~Yj ] ~ pfyfi _ _ .ii JM~n _ ~ A iitt ~~Md a_ A n_ SIA~~ G :~ -~. I i J a J a g a • -tom YN K a ~y _ !- a a K ~ N i ~ 8 g s i D ~ ~ i - : -- - ~ i ~. r _~'J s S ~~ kt 3 u~,a a . ;,~ . ~3 ~g ~ i i S 551 ~ 8 ~--- ~~ '8 ~" 2 s~~: ~..' ~ 1 3l4NiO ~ii~tLlfVMI C ------- S i . I / ~~ w ~-,.. ~~ i~ 8j i 2 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P ~ + yy ~4 a .~ ~ ~ i ~ i a '^ L C S ~ a p F- < ,~~ S a ~' O ~~- . o c ;~ 0~ _ ~~- a a a g~~ b H S~ pa,@~ a ~ ~~n ~i~wst ~wi lsss Z a ~ 1 ~ ~ , ~~ 3 z ~ 3 z ~ ~~ ~ £ ~~ ~~ J r~ 5 a~~ Y ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ` a ~ ~-~ z 3y~ ~~ ~~ a_ o ~ ~.~ ~' Z o S ~ x 5~> v . ~,~> GO ~~~ ~ oix ~®e® ~ r • _~ f~ Q ~ N ~ ~ ~ U '-' O ~ ~ C I ~ a ~ C ~ ~ F z WZ~ ~ Q c a Q 9 ~~# M~ = 1~ ~ a ~ ~ s~ ~~ '.~~s'i I_i ~3 §~ ~Y 3 ~ ~~ Yz s ~ '~ T, 3 ~p ~ Y"s = x r ~ x~ ~~ J .d ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ T ~ ~: ~~ ~~~[~ ~~ V ~a . ~ ~a~~ ,.: s~.;8 s,~= x~$. fi ~;~ Y$ ie ap ~~ T~ ~~ a Z s _ `r ~~W~~~ ~ k 2p _ ~F J ~ntdo:2 tl ~~ ~~ ~I ~~ Q ~ ~ ~,_ § ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o~ . ~KK }~~ Cs ~ ~~~.~ ~~ ~' ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~~ ~ ~~ i' ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 4 4 ~ I'('~-]I1 ~ V \\ 1 1 C ~ 7 W 3T s~ ~ ~ £ ~W~~d ri~ ~R ~~ 2F~ ~ ~~~ °~ ~ ~ v ~;~ -e~ ~ z ' ~~ Ew ~ 8 n ~~r x ~~~~"A~ g~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ F a~ ~~ ~2 ~j ,z~7 ~sC° .~ a .:., ;r ., t t ...,. e N ~-~.~,~ w-,e J ^ J ~ O O • b~ ., ~ ~ a ~ s =g S o •~ o ~ e ~ yn s-sras anI p, as.+,e ~ V ~-u.-.t Z ~ ~~~ i,F - g~!' S ~~ 0 s d~ s ~ ® s V 1~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ \ ~ f . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q / ~ anie~a VHINYW ~' E s ~ ~` ~ ~~ ~ ~ ; a~ I a - I ~ I I ~ I I I ~ , I= I~ ~ ~ I d O I ~ `~ ,. ~ r J a ~ . a I . ~ ~- i ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ / °. ~~ ® o~ ~ ~ <a$ s i opt ~ ~ vs + I 0~W ~ y I ~~ ~ ~ /I F~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 I • ~ is ~ . ~' ._ I ® ~ ~~• ~r a ~ v ~ i•= ~~-g^FO~ ~n~o r ~~ , y J _ ~ ~ ~ g~ ~_ I 'a i r ~ L ~~-~o~•~~~~~3~~~~ ~ b • ® ._._. ~ ~ .mot ,~Tr'1 1iill Lail i 0 +' ~ ~ ~ ~ a i° ZO o~ ~, a. Q, 2 ~ J Z Fil ~ Q Q ,.._, a- • ___ i a i ss~s~soa ~eoti L£0-bL0-68£ #Ndb' '`d~ ~b'rJ01`d>=1t1S ~.,~ vo 'voolvavs db'O~! Oll(1C~ 680£l-d>=1b'H~dO H~I~>:104 ~;~.~` "rz~ ° " o N~o~e la3aoa ~- 5 ~, ~ ~ ~ ; IH~db'JdS WI~dS ~~ccc~~~ ~ ~ ~- r ~ k~ m O o ~~n1~n~i1~oH ~ ~ ~ ~ J ,f"b~ < ~nild~~0 ~Sf10H MAN f, S`" ~ ~ Z 4~,,,,,,,,,,,,~*,,,,,,,,,,,~ W~,.m W ri'~ N o ^Z I_.L W H ~- W Q I_L_I ~ ~ ~ W ~ p Q U Z ~ U Z ~ p ~ ~ Q ~ W U p ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ X U ~ ~ ~ ~ O X 0 Q Q Q p ` X Q p Z Q Q Y I FU-1 I I W pq I Z I-I ` I Z ~3 p p U I- i ~- V J ,8 W W J W Q Q l'7 ~~ cV N •