The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-11-2006 Planning Commission PacketCITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMNIISSION SITE VISIT AGEi~TDA Tuesday, April 11, 2006 - 3:30 p.m. City Hall Parking Lot, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Site Visit Committee SITE VISTTS WILI, BE MADE TO THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FOR TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 2006 REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA AGENDA 1. Application 04-068 2. Application 06-145 3. Application 03-254 Malladi 14345 Springer Avenue Pro Signs, Inc. 12220-12228 Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd. Ho 14289 Sobey Road The study session item will not have a site visit because the commissioners have already been to the site. The Site Visit Committee is comprised of interested Planning Commission members. The committee conducts site visits to properties that are new items on the Planning Commission Agenda. The site visits are held on the Tuesday preceding the Wednesday hearing, between 3:30 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. It is encouraged for the applicant and/or owner to be present to answer any questions that may arise. Site visits are generally short (5 to 10 minutes) because of time constraints. Any presentations and testimony you may wish to give should be saved for the Public Hearing. • • CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION AGENDA DATE: Wednesday, April 12, 2006, 5:30 p.m. PLACE: Administrative Conference Room located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 TYPE: Adjourned Regular Meeting ROLL CALL REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on April 6, 2006. STUDY SESSION AGENDA Wireless Facility for NexteUSprint at 19950 Prospect Avenue (Church of the Ascension) Application #04-177, APN 386-35-069 ~: The study session is an information meeting for the Planning Commission. No decisions will be made at this meeting. ADJOURNMENT TO REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Wednesday, April 12, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers/Civic Theater 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA LJL;7ilRlil~ ((JJ71t712~'SIOII Stt/(h'-Si',S:S/Oil ~•fNrtiOt"LZtR1Ur71 1 Desi~rrr 12e?~ce+~ 0=t-I '", 1 ~~JU l'r•ospc~ct ~u~~ruc<~ • PLANNING COMMISSION ~~L STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lata Vasudevan, AICP . J Associate Planner ~~/ MEETING DATE: April 12, 2006 SUBJECT: Wireless Facility for NexteUSprint at 19950 Prospect Ave. (Church of the Ascension) Application #04-177, APN 386-35-069 RECOMMENDATION: That the. Planning Commission review the proposed design of the wireless facility on a preliminary basis and provide input to the applicant, neighbors, and staff. PROPOSED PROJECT: Background The applicant filed Conditional Use Permit Application #04-177 on June 3, 2004. This application proposes the installation of cellular antennas and related equipment enclosed in a proposed shelter attached to the Community Hall building within the church complex. On August 24, 2005, this application was presented to the Planning Commission at a public hearing. The main feature of the proposal that was presented at this public hearing was the installation of a 50-foot tall artificial redwood tree that would be located on a landscaped island within a parking area to the rear of the Community Hall. This artificial tree -commonly referred to as a `monopine' -would conceal the proposed cellular antennas attached to its artificial tree trunk. At the August 24, 2005 public hearing, there was significant opposition to this application, as expressed by several neighbors in the vicinity of the site. The primary concerns included the appearance of the monopine and its location near the eastern side of the Church property adjacent to Miller Avenue and Eric Drive. The Planning Commission also inquired about the necessity of placing cellular antennas at this site in reference to cellular coverage needs. At the end of the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to continue the application to a date uncertain, and requested that the applicant explore antenna locations west of the Community Hall, away ,from the concerned neighbors situated towards the east of the site. The meeting minutes from the August 24`h public hearing are attached. Plnnnitc~; Gofnniissinrz Sta~~lt~ Session -19ern.vrafti/um 2 L)csi~>n Xeviel~~ Od-l'?, 19>~rl Pro~Pc~ct ~rentic~ • Revised Plans __ The revised plans submitted shown in the attached documents propose cellular antennas concealed within three poles that are approximately 40 feet tall and have a 14 inch diameter. The applicant proposes to attach flags to each pole - a United States, State and County flag. Because of concerns about the appearance and maintenance of monopines, the applicant and Staff felt that cellular antennas concealed within poles would be more appropriate. Neighbor Notification Staff has received neighbor notification templates and a significant number of comments about the current proposal. The neighbor letters and emails are attached. As repeatedly stated by one of the concerned neighbors, the primary issue relates to the excessive width of each pole, which is twice the diameter of a typical flag pole. For the Study Session, the applicant is prepared to address the pole design. A concerned neighbor is certain that each pole can be reduced in diameter and has conducted extensive research on this matter, as seen in the attached correspondences. However, the applicant maintains that its proposed width is the smallest that can be done because of technological limitations of the antennas that would be concealed within the poles. Public Noticing Notices for the April 12, 2006 Study Session were mailed to property owners within 500 feet. STUDY SESSION REQUIREMENTS: During the Study Session, the Planning Commission may only discuss items related to the project. The agenda does not allow any formal votes or motions on the proposed project or other matters. The Study Session is afact-finding meeting where the Commission may discuss the item and ask questions from or hear statements from members of the public attending the meeting. No comments made during the Study Session by the Planning Commission are binding or required to be carried through to the formal public hearing where actions will be taken on the proposed project. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Neighbor Comments 2. Meeting Minutes, August 24, 2005 3. Reduced Plans and Photo Simulations • • Attachment l • Page 1 of 2 Lata Vasudevan From: Hui Liu [huiliu001 @yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 10:07 PM To: Lata Vasudevan Subject: Nextel Project (#04-177) Apri15, 2006 Hui Liu 19617 Ashton Court Saratoga, CA 95070 Lata Vasudevan, AICP Associate Planner City of Saratoga Project Address: 19550 Prospect Road Applicant Name: Nextel Wireless. Application Number: 04-177 Use Permit Dear Lata, • I am writing to you and the Planning Commission regarding to the planned project above. My wife and I bought our house three and half years ago. The primary reasons we chose to live in Saratoga was the nice residential neighborhood and the excellent schools. This planned project worries us in two aspects: home value-and safety. Last weekend, there was an open house in our neighborhood (19642 Ascension Drive). I went there on Saturday afternoon to take a look. Iran into a couple who happened to be my acquaintances. I asked them if they knew that there was planned project for the Nextel station. They were very concerned about this and said that they definitely did not want this house since they have two young kids. While. we were talking, another lady overheard our conversation, and immediately jumped in. Her reaction was the same. They were not going to buy it because of this may affect. their kidsa€TM health and the home resale value. Two potential buyers in our neighborhood were gone. As a recent buyer at Saratoga, I understand their thinking. I would not buy house here if I knew that possible projects like this. In current market, most of buyers have young kids, they are willing to pay high price to buy house in Saratoga for the beautiful environment and the excellent schools. To them, the safety of kids is the most important consideration. No one is willing to take the risk. Let face it, even FCC did not specify the health risk of a cell phone station, it doesna€TMt mean there is no risk. This is why home owners have to disclose it as potential hazards by law. Just this week, a Swedish study finds the following: According to a Swedish study, if you spend many years using your cell phone for at least an hour a day your risk of developing a brain tumor is 240% higher than a person who never uses one. The results of this study go against another recent one carried out in the UK and published in January, 2006, which indicated that cell phone use is safe for humans. 4/6/2006 Page 2 of 2 (http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/healthnews.php?newsid=40764&nfid=rssfeeds) This kind of news will deter potential home buyers near-cell stations, since station antennas emit much more powerful radiation 24 hours a day. Buyers dons€TMt like uncertainty, especially related to the health of their kids. Parents are not going to put their kid in an environment with any risk. Experts can argue forever if the risk is true or not. However, this kind of arguments will hurt the neighborhood. Home price depends on the psychological and emotional assessment. It is the buyer who determines the puce. Ultimately, the Church gets $2000 per month, every one else lose. The home price goes down, home owners lose money, and the city and county will get less property tax, which will in turn hurt our schools. I would like to ask the Commission to stop this project. City Commission should represent our residentsa€TM interest. Many other companies, such as Verizon, Cingular and Sprint, have good coverage in our neighborhood WITHOUT antennas in the Church. It is Nextela€TMS responsibility to find other means to enhance their services, but not at Saratoga residentsa€TM cost. Thank you very much for your attention. Sincerely yours, Hui Liu PS. I would like to send this letter to each member of the Commission. Would you please forward it to them since I dons€TMt have their email address? Yahoo!..Messeiger.._wth Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. 4/6/2006 • Apri15, 2006 Commissioner Susie V. Nagpal,-Chair Commissioner Manny Coppello Commissioner Jill Hunter Commissioner Robert A. Kundtz Commissioner Linda Rogers Commissioner Michael Schallop Commissioner Mike Uhl Application Number: 04-177 Nextel Wireless Use Permit The plans call for 3 poles, each with a concealed commercial cellular antenna, to be located at the Church of the Ascension on the west side of Worner Hall. An overwhelming number of Saratoga neighbors near the proposed location of the Nextel Antenna and within 500 feet of the Church of Ascension property have, and continue to be, opposed to any antennas being located on the Church of Ascension property. They don't like being harassed by attempts to place it at one location versus another location or a fake tree versus fake flagpoles; they simply don't want it at all, period. Their concerns, as Saratoga residents living with their families in their Saratoga residential community and the impact it will have on each one of them, should be more important than the Church of the Ascension's desire for $2,000/month of income from this commercial venture. 1. The antennas are for a limited number of Nextel users in San Jose and Saratoga that use their Walkie-Talkie feature. They get reception today from existing antenna locations in San Jose and Saratoga. If it needs to be enhanced, for these limited number of users, Nextel should add additional antennas at existing Sprint/Nextel sites or find other local sites in San Jose and Saratoga that are not in a 100% residential neighborhood like ours. These limited number of Nextel users could also get a similar feature from other providers, like their parent company Sprint, without Nextel putting these commercial antennas in our 100% Saratoga residential neighborhood. The Nextel revenue would transfer to Sprint but "it would all stay in the Sprint/Nextel family". 2. Commercial development should not be tolerated in a residential community because its negative impact degrades the serenity and quality of life in our residential neighborhood. Local residents chose Saratoga because they thought it was a city where protection of the residential atmosphere is very important. They purchased their homes in this residential community with that belief and they don't want any commercial antenna in their neighborhood. Setting this precedence in this location will open the floodgates to all the other service providers. Everyone will come. They will also be encouraged by the church since the churches only interest is the $2,000/month they would get from each provider. This commercial development can also lower property values since negative feature, such • as the proposed commercial antennas either on a residential property or adjacent to it or near it, create an adverse influence on the desirability of the property in the local area. Actions required to address the specific concerns about the proposed design. Reduce the total visual impact and make the remaining poles look like real and not artificial flagpoles. Ensure no future expansion of site by Nextel or any other service provider. 1. Reduce their number of poles with flags from 3 to 1 or 2 by utilizing other locations. 2. Reduce the visual and artificial impact of the remaining poles with flags by applying the same criteria (11 inch bottom diameter tapered to 7 inches at the top) the city has alread}~ used successfully with Metro PCS for the Saratoga Library Flagpole. The criteria must be met for this proposed l00% residential location since it eras met for the library location which does not even have a 100% residential community surrounding it. F<~_ __ ~: ; I.. ~.. • • ~~ ~~ .-- Pole with Antenna and flag at top Nektel needs to learn from. what Metro PCS has already done and both Nestel and the Church of the Ascension need to ensure that no future antennas ~~ill be placed on this site. .........................o...................................................., Metro PCS used a 6.25 inch diameter and 7 foot long commercial antenna at the top of a tapered pole that is 6.25 inches in diameter at its top and 11 inches at its bottom. The mounting bracket at the bottom of the antenna is internally mounted to an internal pole for structural integrity. The joint between the top of the external pole and the bottom of the cylindrical antenna looks relatively seamless. The Metro PCS Construction Manager James Weiland can be reached at 510-747-4606. As a Metro PCS employee he is proud of what they were able to do for Saratoga U Flagpole with Antenna at Saratoga Library Real Flagpole Lata Vasudevan ~rom: John Livingstone Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:23 PM To: Lata Vasudevan Subject: FW: Thank You /Follow up on 3_15_06 Council presentation for Master Wireless Facilities Plan Hi Lata, will print this out and put it in the Nextel file. I know three months from now someone will ask for this info. Thanks John 1 -----Original Message----- From: pjfontenot [mailto:pjfontenot@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 9:26 PM To: Nick Streit; Ann Waltonsmith; Kathleen King; Cc: John Livingstone; pjfontenotc~yahoo.com Subject: Thank You / Follow up on 3_15_06 Council Facilities Plan Saratoga Council Members, Norm Kline; Aileen Kao; Dave Anderson presentation for Master Wireless Thank you for the opportunity to present my concern about the lack of a Master Wireless Facilities Plan for Saratoga at tonight's City Council meeting during Oral Communications. The City Council considering a step-up in priority encouraged me. I was further encouraged by the suggestion of the utilization of off-line means/resources as well. I would like to provide the contact information to a local independent consultant that I spoke to during the various course of my research and whom I referenced in tonight's presentation. However, I did not include the contact information in my letter packet to he City Council. Kreines & Kreines, Inc. 58 Paseo Mirasol, Tiburon, CA 94920 Phone: (415) 435-9214 Fax: (415) 435-1522 e-mail: mail@planwireless.com www.planwireless.com The person spoke directly with was Ted Kreines. He was the consultant retained by the City of Cupertino during the formulation of their plan. He stated that he would be willing to provide a free presentation to the appropriate Saratoga audience. I would like to request City Council and Staff to contact Krienes & Krienes and request a presentation for the appropriate Saratoga audience. Regards, Paul Fontenot Do You Yahoo!? Tired of Spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com L J 1 ' Comcast Message Center rage t of ~ n -From: raymuzzy@comcast.net To: Ivasudevan@saratoga.ce. us Subject: An 11 inch diameter pole can be done and it i5 even better Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 04:34:25 +0000 Lata I should have sent you the information about the antenna as well so you will have the complete package. The RF Engineer recommended the Andrew antenna since it provides the smallest Outer Diameter (O.D.) dimension for enclosing cross polarized antennas at the cellular frequency bands. Manufacturer Gain Dimensions (L x Model Number O.D. Andrew 13.6 dBi only 58.5" x 11" O.D. 854DG70VTRSX The specific specification sheet with photos of the antenna is anacnea. You probaby can get some support from the city engineers as they review the Saratoga Library Metro PLC flagpole and this material. I hope you are able to convince Christian to do what can and needs to do. Ray -------------- Original message -------------- From: raymuzzy@comcast.net Lata .-- The antenna that was selected by their RF Engineer is designed with a k Th t 't can actual) be attached to the • bottom mounting brac et. a an enna uni y top of an 11 inch diameter straight pole or a tapered pole that is 11 inches at the top where the antenna is attached. Christian does not want to do it and is going to give a number of very emotional excuses about why it can't : ~ be done. The fact of the matter is it has been done. by other companies. Metro PCS did it and you have an excellent example in front of the Saratoga Library. It does not "look shoddy" and the storms of the last several months have 1~ ~ Rce vainly put that flagpole to the test about its structural integrity. ~ ` ~ -------------- Original message -------------- From: raymuzzy@comcast.net Lata 1 wanted to share an e-mail I sent to Christian to provide a constructive suggestion in response to his e-mail to me. The use of 12 inch diameter seamless poles is better than 14 inch diameter seamless poles. It is not the final answer but it can clearly be done and it is a move in the right direction. You will also note that I kept it constructive and avoided the obvious non-constructive responses like: Metro PCS did a tapered antenna pole at the Saratoga Library and it does not °look shoddy" ~~ ~~ `n ~, http://mailcenter.comcast.net/wmc/v/wm/44157DF400030A6D0000002022073000339796... 3/13/2006 854DG70VTRSX DECIBEL' • ~~piRE`~~ t45° Three Sector Antenna ease Station ,4ntennas ^ Three independent XPoI antennas in a single antenna system ^ Each antenna allows for independent beam tittirig to optimize each sedor ^ Total antenna system in less than 11° diameter ^ Fully integrated flange mounting system for easy installation Frequency (MHz) : 806 - 896 Polarization : t45° Gain (dBd/dBi) : 11.5/13.6 Azimuth BW (Deg.): 75 Elevation BW (Deg.): 16 Beam Tilt (Deg.): 2-14 Front-To-Back Ratio" (dB) : 25 Isolation (d6) : >30 VSWR : <1.4:1 PIM3 ~ 2 x 20w (dBc) : -145 Max. Input Power (Warts) : 500 Impedance (Ohms) : 50 Lightning Protection : DC Ground • 897 -940 t45° 11.5/13.6 75 16 2-14 >15 25 >30 <2.0:1 -145 500 50 DC Ground Weight : 19.9 kg (44 Ib) Dimensions (LxOD) : 1,486 x 279 mm (58.5 x 11 in) Max. Wind Area : 0.14 m= (1.5 ft~ ) Max. Wind Load (~ 100 mph) : 364.7 N (82 Ibf) Max. Wind Speed : 201 km/h (125 mph) Hardware Material : Integrated Flange Connector Type : 7-16 DIN -Female (6, Bottom) Color : Light Gray Standard Mounting Hardware : 085093-001 . Andrew Corporation Fax: 214.631.4708 ' -Indicates Typical 2601 Telecom Parkway Toll Free Tel: 1.800.678.5342 5/11/2005 Richardson, Texas U.S.A 75082-3521 Fax: 1.800.229.4706 Tel: 214.831.0310 www.andrew.com dt>teCh@andrew.com Infom-ation correct at date of issue but maybe sub/ect to change without notice. ~~ 854DG70VTRSX DEC/BEL• AHDAEiII/m t45° Three Sector Antenna Base Station Antennas Fxeq: 8~ MHz, T~1t: 2 1 Fes: aso MHz, T;zt: a Andrew Corporation Fax: 214.631.4706 ` -Indicates Typical • 2601 Telecom Parkway Toll Free Tel: 1.800.676.5342 5/11/2005 Richardson, Texas U.S.A 75082-3521 Fax: 1.800.229.4706 dbtech(dlandrew.com Tel: 214.631.0310 www.andrew.com Information aoneGY at date of issue but maybe subject to change without nodoe. _~-350 D 1D .... _ __ 350 D 10 ..., • • Comcast Message Center From: raymuzzy@comcast.net To: Ivasudevan@saratoga.ca. us Subject: Re: An 11 inch diameter pole can be done and it is even better Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:08:26 +0000 Lata I should have included this photo which is a close-up of the Saratoga Library Flagpole near its top. Look on the flagpole just below the bottom of the flag and you will see where the smooth attachment was made between the top of the pole and antenna section above it. Ray ----=--------- Original message -------------- From: raymuzzy@comcast.net Lata The antenna that was selected by their RF Engineer is designed with a bottom mounting bracket. The antenna unit can actually be attached to the top of an 11 inch diameter straight pole or a tapered pole that is 11 inches at the top where the antenna is attached. Christian does not want to do it and is going to give a number of very emotional excuses about why it can't be done. The fact of the matter is it has been done by other companies. -Metro PCS did it and you have an excellent example in front of the Saratoga Library. It does not "look shoddy" and the storms of the last several months have certainly put that flagpole to the test about its structural integrity. Ray -------------- Original message -------------- From: raymuzzy@comcast.net Lata 1 wanted to share an a-mail I sent to Christian to provide a constructive suggestion in response to his a-mail to me. The use of 12 inch diameter seamless poles is better than 14 inch diameter seamless poles. It is not the final answer but it can clearly be done and it is a move in the right direction. You will also note that I kept it constructive and avoided the obvious non- constructive responses like: • Metro PCS did a tapered antenna pole at the Saratoga Library and it does not "look shoddy" • 1 only suggest using his cell phone number, which is printed on his business cards for all to see, when he doesn't return a-mail responses in a timely manner. I wish you the best in preparing the final report for the Planning Commission. Ray • -------------- Forwarded Message: -------------- From: raymuzzy@comcast.net To: "Svensk, Christian" <C.Svensk@parsons.com> Subject: RE: FW: Use of alternate antenna panel Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:05:47 +0000 Christian http://mailcenter.comcast.net/wmc/v/wm/4415 7E3F00004EC800003 80422007348309796... Yage 1 of :i 3/13/2006 • • Comcast Message Center • From: raymuzzy@comcast.net To: Ivasudevan@sa ratoga.ca. us Subject: An 11 inch diameter pole can be done and it is even better Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:49:31 +0000 Lata The antenna that was selected by their RF Engineer is designed with a bottom mounting bracket. The antenna unit can actually be attached to the top of an 11 inch diameter straight pole or a tapered pole that is 11 inches at the top where the antenna is attached. Christian does not want to do it and is going to give a number of very emotional excuses about why it can't be done. The fact of the matter is it has been done by other companies. Metro PCS did it and you have an excellent example in front of the Saratoga Library. It does not "look shoddy° and the storms of the last several months have certainly put that flagpole to the test about its structural integrity. Ray -------------- Original message -------------- From: raymuzzy@comcast.net Lata 1 wanted to share an a-mail I sent to Christian to provide a constructive suggestion in response to his e-mail to me. The use of 12 inch diameter seamless poles is better than 14 inch diameter seamless poles. It is not the final answer but it can clearly be done and it is a move in the right direction. You will also note that I kept it constructive and avoided the obvious non-constructive responses like: Metro PCS did a tapered antenna pole at the Saratoga Library and it does not °look shoddy° I only suggest using his cell phone number, which is printed on his business cards for all to see, when he doesn't return a-mail responses in a timely.manner. I wish you the best in preparing the final report for the Planning Commission. Ray -------------- Forwarded Message: -------------- From: raymuzzy@comcast.net To: "Svensk, Christian" <C.Svensk@parsons.com> Subject: RE: FW: Use of alternate antenna panel Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:05:47 +0000 Christian Don't be foolish and stick to your original 14 inch diameter pole. Your RF Engineer has got you to the point where an 11 inch diameter antenna with a bottom mount will meet your requirements on each of the three poles. The interior pole that supports the antenna will go up the interior of the external pole and the bottom of the antenna will be secured to it. This means you can now use a 12 inch diameter pole and still have sufficient clearance between the exterior of the antenna and the internal surface of the pole. The wide resistance of the 12 inch pole is 15% less than that of a 14 inch pole. As an added benefit you will reduce the visual impact of the pole. You need to give this some serious thought. Yage 1 of 1 http://mailcenter.comcast.net/wmc/v/wm/44157EB40006B60F00004B9C22070208539796... 3/ 13/2006 Comcast Message Center Ray -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Svensk, Christian" <C.Svensk@parsons.com> One cannot "perch" an 11" cylinder atop a 14" pole, any method of attachment would compromise the overall integrity of the pole (earthquakes, wind load, etc) and look shoddy. It is safer 8~ more logical to house them in one seamless, pole. Granted, we must -unfortunately -compromise the aesthetics to a certain degree. However, any sane person would agree that it is better to have structurally safe poles over aesthetically more exact, non-structurally sound poles, especially at the entrance of a church. These poles must meet strict, structural-integrity requirements both for the building & safety codes as well as for the protection of the equipment within them. Please desist with your threats to call my cell phone. Christian Svensk PARSONS 185 Berry St #5300 San Francisco, CA 94107 desk: (415) 962-1661 fax: (415) 495-6277 [ Back ] G 2006 Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. Ali rights reserved. Yage Z ofl • • http://mailcenter.comcast.net/wmc/v/wm/44157EB40006B60F00004B9C22070208539796... 3/13/2006 • Comcast Message Center Yage 1 of 1 • • • From: raymuzzy@Comcast.net To: "Lata Vasudevan" <Ivasudevan@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: RE: Flagpole in front of Saratoga Library Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 02:47:56 +0000 Here are the specific details for the flagpole in front of the Saratoga Library: Flagpole Bottom diameter: 11 inches Diameter at 41 feet: 6.25 inches Diameter at 48 inches (top); 6.25 inches Antenna tube: 6.25 inches in diameter and 7 feet long Antennas (3): EMS MTRR75-17-OOOPPL Flag: 8 feet by 12 feet Color of flagpole: White Service Provider Metro PCS in Dallas, TX -------------- Original message -------------- From: raymuzzy@comcast.net I spent some time this afternoon looking over the file. It was very interesting since their proposal was simular to what Nextel is proposing. The service provider MetroPCS was very responsive to the many concerns the city expressed in order to minimize the impact on even this semi- residential area. [ Back ] G 2006 Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. http://mailcenter.Comcast.net/wmc/v/wm/44157EED0003F 1530000521 E22070208539796... 3/13/2006 Page 1 of 2 Lata VasudevanM _ T _ • From: raymuzzy@comcast.net Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 11:47 AM To: Lata Vasudevan Subject: A 12 inch diameter pole can be done and it is better Lata I wanted to share an a-mail I sent to Christian to provide a constructive suggestion in response to his a-mail to me. The use of 12 inch diameter seamless poles is better than 14 inch diameter seamless poles. It is not the final answer but it can clearly be done and it is a move in the right direction. You will also note that I kept it constructive and avoided the obvious non-constructive responses like: • Metro PCS did a tapered antenna pole at the Saratoga Library and it does not "look shoddy" • I only suggest using his cell phone number, which is printed on his business cards for all to see, when he doesn't return a-mail responses in a timely manner. I wish you the best in preparing the final report for the Planning Commission. Ray • --------------.Forwarded Message: -------------- From: raymuzzy@comcast.net To: "Svensk, Christian" <C.Svensk@parsons.com> Subject: RE: FW: Use of alternate antenna panel Date: -Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:05:47 +0000 Christian Don't be foolish and stick to your original 14 inch diameter pole. Your RF Engineer has got you to the point where an 11 inch diameter antenna with a bottom mount will meet your requirements on each of the three poles. The interior pole that supports the antenna will go up the interior of the external pole and the bottom of the antenna will be secured to it. This means you can now use a 12 inch diameter pole and still have sufficient clearance between the exterior of the antenna and the internal surface of the pole: The wide resistance of the 12 inch pole is 15% less than that of a 14 inch pole. As an added benefit you will reduce the visual impact of the pole. You need to give this some serious thought. Ray -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Svensk, Christian" <C.Svensk@parsons.com> One cannot "perch" an 11"cylinder atop a 14" pole, any method of attachment would compromise the overall integrity of the pole (earthquakes, wind load, etc) and look shoddy. Page 2 of 2 It is safer & more logical to house them in one seamless, pole. Granted, we must -unfortunately • -compromise the aesthetics to a certain degree. However, any sane person would agree that it is better to have structurally safe poles over aesthetically more exact, non-structurally sound poles, especially at the entrance of a church. These poles must meet strict, structural-integrity requirements both for the building & safety codes as well as for the protection of the equipment within them. Please desist with your threats to call my cell phone. Christian Svensk PARSONS 185 Berry St #5300 San Francisco, CA 94107 desk: (415) 962-1661 fax: (415) 495-6277 • ~n zi~nn~ Page 1 of 2 Lata Vasudevan ~ • From: raymuzzy@comcast.net Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 9:50 AM To: Lata Vasudevan Subject: An 11 inch diameter pole can be done and it is even better Lata The antenna that was selected by their RF Engineer is designed with a bottom mounting bracket. The antenna unit can actually be attached to the top of an 11 inch diameter straight pole or a tapered pole that is 11 inches at the top where the antenna is attached. Christian does not want to do it and is going to give a number of very emotional excuses about why it can't be done. The fact of the matter is it has been done by other companies. Metro PCS did it and you have an excellent example in front of the Saratoga Library. It does not "look shoddy" and the storms of the last several months have certainly put that flagpole to the test about its structural integrity. Ray -------------- Original message -------------- From: raymuzzy@comcast.net Lata I wanted to share an a-mail I sent to Christian to provide a constructive suggestion in response to his a-mail to me. The use of 12 inch diameter seamless poles is better than 14 inch diameter seamless poles. It is not the final answer but it can clearly be done and it is a move in the right direction. You will also note that I kept it constructive and avoided the obvious non-constructive responses like: • Metro PCS did a tapered antenna pole at the Saratoga Library and it does not "look shoddy" • I only suggest using his cell phone number, which is printed on his business cards for all to see, when he doesn't return a-mail responses in a timely manner. I wish you the best in preparing the final report for the Planning Commission. Ray -------------- Forwarded Message: -------------- From: raymuzzy@comcast.net To: "Svensk, Christian" <C.Svensk@parsons.com> Subject: RE: FW: Use of alternate antenna panel Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:05:47 +0000 Christian Don't be foolish and stick to your original 14 inch diameter pole. Your RF Engineer has got you to the point where an 11 inch diameter antenna with a Page 2 of 2 bottom mount will meet your requirements on each of the three poles. The interior pole that supports the antenna will go up the interior of the external pole and the bottom of the antenna will be secured to it. This means you can now use a 12 inch diameter pole and still have sufficient clearance between the exterior of the antenna and the internal surface of the pole. The wide resistance of the 12 inch pole is 15% less than that of a 14 inch pole. As an added benefit you will reduce the visual impact of the pole. You need to give this some serious thought. --------- Original message 1: "Svensk, Christian" <C.Svensk@parsons.com> cannot "perch" an 11"cylinder atop a 14" pole, any method of attachment would promise the overall integrity of the pole (earthquakes, wind load, etc) and look It is safer & more logical to house them in one seamless, pole. Granted, we must - unfortunately -compromise the aesthetics to a certain degree. However, any sane person would agree that it is better to have structurally safe poles over aesthetically more exact, non-structurally sound poles, especially at the entrance of a church. poles must meet strict, structural-integrity requirements both for the building & codes as well as for the protection of the equipment within them. • desist with your threats to call my cell phone. Christian Svensk 185 Berry. St #5300 San Francisco, CA 94107 desk: (415) 962-1661 fax: (415) 495-6277 Page 1 of Z Lata Vasudevan From: raymuzzy@comcast.net Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 10:08 AM To: Lata Vasudevan Subject: Re: An 11 inch diameter pole can be done and it is even better Lata I should have included this photo which is a close-up of the Saratoga Library Flagpole near its top. Look on the flagpole just below the bottom of the flag and you will see where the smooth attachment was made between the top of the pole and antenna section above it. Ray -------------- Original message -------------- From: raymuzzy@comcast.net Lata The antenna that was selected by their RF Engineer is designed with a bottom mounting bracket. The antenna unit can actually be attached to the top of an 11 inch diameter straight pole or a tapered pole that is 11 inches at the top where the antenna is attached. Christian does not want to do it and is going to give a number of very emotional excuses about why it can't be done. The fact of the matter is it has been done by other companies. Metro PCS did it and • you have an excellent example in front of the Saratoga Library. It does not "look shoddy" and the storms of the last several months have certainly put that flagpole to the test about its structural integrity. Ray -------------- Original message - From: raymuzzy@comcast.net Lata I wanted to share an a-mail I sent to Christian to provide a constructive suggestion in response to his a-mail to me. The use of 12 inch diameter seamless poles is better than 14 inch diameter seamless poles. It is not the final answer but it can clearly be done and it is a move in the right direction. You will also note-that I kept it constructive and avoided the obvious non- constructive responses like: • Metro PCS did a tapered antenna pole at the Saratoga Library and it does not "look shoddy" • I only suggest using his cell phone number, which is printed on his business cards for all to see, when he doesn't return a-mail responses in a timely manner. I wish ou the best in preparing the final report for the Planning Commission. Y Ray Page 2 of 2 -------------- Forwarded Message: -------------- From: raymuzzy@comcast.net To: "Svensk, Christian" <C.Svensk@parsons.com> Subject: RE: FW: Use of alternate antenna panel Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:05:47 +0000 on't be foolish and stick to your original 14 inch diameter pole. our RF Engineer has got you to the point where an 11 inch diameter antenna ith a bottom mount will meet your requirements on each of the three poles. he interior pole that supports the antenna will go up the interior of the external ale and the bottom of the antenna will be secured to it. This means you can ~w use a 12 inch diameter pole and still have sufficient clearance between the cterior of the antenna and the internal surface of the pole. he wide resistance of the 12 inch pole is 15% less than that of a 14 inch pole. s an added benefit you will reduce the visual impact of the pole. ou need to give this some serious thought. • -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Svensk, Christian" <C.Svensk@parsons.com> One cannot "perch" an 11"cylinder atop a 14" pole, any method of attachment would compromise the overall integrity of the pole (earthquakes, wind load, etc} and look shoddy. It is safer & more logical to house them in one seamless, pole. Granted, we must -unfortunately -compromise the aesthetics to a certain degree. However, any sane person would agree that it is bet#er to have structurally safe poles over aesthetically more exact, non-structurally sound poles, especially at the entrance of a church. ese poles must meet strict, structural-integrity requirements both for the ilding & safety codes as well as for the protection of the equipment within. desist with your threats to call my cell phone. Svensk 185 Berry St #5300 San Francisco, CA 94107 desk: (415) 962-1661 fax: (415)495-6277 • Page 1 of 3 Lata Vasudevan From: raymuzzy@comcast.net Sent:. Sunday, March 12, 2006 8:34 PM To: Lata Vasudevan Subject: An 11 inch diameter pole can be done and it is even better Lata I should have sent you the information about the antenna as well so you will have the complete package. The RF Engineer recommended the Andrew antenna since it provides the smallest Outer Diameter (O.D.) dimension for enclosing cross polarized antennas at the cellular frequency bands. Manufacturer Gain Dimensions. (L x O.D.) Model Number Andrew 13.6 dBi only 58.5" x 11" O.D. 854DG70VTRSX The specific specification sheet with photos of the antenna is attached. You probaby can get some support from the city engineers as they review the Saratoga Library Metro PLC flagpole and this material. I hope you are able to convince Christian to do • what can and needs to do. Ray -------------- Original message -------------- From: raymuzzy@comcast.net Lata The antenna that was selected by their RF Engineer is designed with a bottom mounting bracket. The antenna unit can actually be attached to the top of an 11 inch diameter straight pole or a tapered pole that is 11 inches at the top where the antenna is attached. Christian does not want to do it and is going to give a number of very emotional excuses about why it can't be done. The fact of the matter is it has been done by other companies. Metro PCS did it and you have an excellent example in front of the Saratoga Library. It does not "look shoddy" and the storms of the last several months have certainly put that flagpole to the test about its structural integrity. Ray -------------- Original message -------------- From: raymuzzy@comcast.net Lata . I wanted to share an a-mail I sent to Christian to provide a constructive suggestion in response to his a-mail to me. The use of 12 inch diameter Page 2 of 3 eamless poles is better than 14 inch diameter seamless poles. It is not ~e final answer but it can clearly be done and it is a move in the right irection. ou will also note that I kept it constructive and avoided the obvious non- ~nstructive responses like: Metro PCS did a tapered antenna pole at the Saratoga Library and it yes not "look shoddy" I only suggest using his cell phone number, which is printed on his ~siness cards for all to see, when he doesn't return a-mail responses in timely manner. wish you the best in preparing the final report for the Planning ;ommission. •------------ Forwarded Message: -------------- rom: raymuzzy@comcast.net o: "Svensk, Christian" <C.Svensk@parsons.com> ubject: RE: FW: Use of alternate antenna panel -ate: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:05:47 +0000 r~ U ~on't be foolish and stick to your original 14 inch diameter pole. our RF Engineer has got you to the point where an 11 inch diameter henna with a bottom mount will meet your requirements on each of the Free poles. The interior pole that supports the. antenna will go up the iterior of the external pole and the bottom of the antenna will be ;cured to it. This means you can now use a 12 inch diameter pole and ill have sufficient clearance between the exterior of the antenna and the sternal surface of the pole. he wide resistance of the 12 inch pole is 15% less than that of a 14 inch ale. As an added benefit you will reduce the visual impact of the pole. ou need to give this some serious thought. ------------- Original message -------------- ~rom: "Svensk, Christian" <C.Svensk@parsons.com> one cannot "perch" an 11"cylinder atop a 14" pole, any method of attachment would compromise the overall integrity of the pole earthquakes, wind load, etc) and look shoddy. • is safer & more logical to house them in one seamless, pole. ranted, we must -unfortunately -compromise the aesthetics to a ertain degree. However,. any sane person would agree that it is etter to have structurally safe poles over aesthetically more exact, on-structurally sound poles, especially at the entrance of a church. ese poles must meet strict, structural-integrity requirements both for building & safety codes as well as for the protection of the z n z i~nn~ equipment within them. Please desist with your threats to call my cell phone. Christian Svensk PARSONS 185 Berry St #5300 San Francisco, CA 94107 desk: (415) 962-1661 fax: (415)495-6277 Page 3 of 3 • • • Comcast Message Center rage i or i From: raymuzzy@comcast.net ~To: "Lata Vasudevan" <Ivasudevan@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: RE: Meeting next week Date: Wed, O1 Mar 2006 22:26:54 +0000 Lata Thank you for taking the time for the meeting this morning. I have attached a photo of the Flagpole with internal antenna in front of the Saratoga Library. That is what NEXTEL needs to do instead of the thick straight pole with flag they proposed. It can be done but it will not use standard commercial antennas. It will be a custom design and will cost more money but NEXTEL makes a lot of money-from its business. It can easily cover the costs and they need to be told that these costs will be the cost of locating antennas in Saratoga residential areas. Ray -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Lata Vasudevan" Ivasudevan@saratoga.ca.us Sure, 8:00 is fine on Wednesday. Attachment 1: Pole with Flag and Flagpoles.doc (application/msword) • [ Back ] ~~ 2006 Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. A!I rights reserved. http://maiicenter.comcast.net/wmc/v/wm/44062709000C5713000006AB220642461397969... 3/1 /2006 Comcast Message Center From: raymuzzy@comcast.net To: "Lata Vasudevan" <Iasudevan@saratoga.ca.us> Subject: RE: Meeting next week Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:32:22 +0000 Lata This is the correct attachment, the photo on the right hand side is the one in front of the Saratoga library. Ray -------------- Original message -------------- From: raymuzzy@comcast.net Lata Thank you for taking the time for the meeting this morning. I have attached a photo of the Flagpole with internal antenna in front of the Saratoga Library. That is what NEXTEL needs to do instead of the thick straight pole with flag they proposed. It can be done but it will not use standard commercial antennas. It will be a custom design and will cost more money but NEXTEL makes a lot of money from its business. It can easily cover the costs and they need to be told that these costs will be the cost of locating antennas in Saratoga residential areas. Ray -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Lata Vasudevan" Iv_asudevan a~sarato_ga.ca,us Sure, 8:00 is fine on Wednesday. Attachment 1: Pole with Flag and Fl~~oles.doc (application/msword) [ Back ] © 2006 Comcast Cabfe Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. Yage 1 of 1. • http://mailcenter.Comcast.nedwmc/v/wm/44157F8D000D86F7000066CB2207020853979... 3/ 13/2006 U ~:_ __ I -~- r:; £r; _ ~ ~ i t ~~~ -- k_. ~~~ ~«,~ c~ ~ ~ a ...° b~A 3 0 a~ ~ 0 ~~ c~ w ap c~ w a~ °ts, a~ w c~ a~ ~~~Ti~ 1""'1 ~~yy i~l . r.r 3 ~I 0 QI r• Y • R3 r..- .~ 3 0 ~, aA w oA c~ w ~ ~~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ w , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,- _ ~.-s, }- y ~ Y L'' ~( Y y.H a ie y ~ Y~- ~ '~ ~~ ~~~ _.Y ~+~ W ~? ~- L ~~ ~ .+ +!1 .,fin t+ ~ .qtr . ~ r i y ~,rs.~ to .., ~ ~~ , ~, ,~~~" ~ ` ~~ A~A, ~1~/ 3 a~ o a • • Attachment 2 n, LJ MINUTES SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 PLACE: Adult Day Care Room, 19655 Allendale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting Chair Nagpal called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Cappello, Hunter, Kundtz, Nagpal, Rodgers and Schallop Absent: Commissioners Uhl Staff: Director John Livingstone and Associate Planner Lata Vasudevan PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES -Regular Meeting of July 27, 2005. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Kundtz, seconded by Commissioner Cappello, the Planning Commission minutes of the regular meeting of July 27, 2005, were adopted with changes to pages 5 and 13. (3-0-1-3; Commissioner Uhl was absent and Commissioners Hunter, Rodgers and Schallop abstained) ORAL COMMUNICATION There were no Oral Communication items. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA Director John Livingstone announced that, pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on August 18, 2005. REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS Chair Nagpal announced that appeals are possible for any decision made on this Agenda by filing an Appeal Application with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15.90.050(b). CONSENT CALENDAR There were no Consent Calendar items. Planning Commission Minutes for August 24, 2005 Page 2 C7 *** PUBLIC HEARING -ITEM NO. 1 APPLICATION #06-020 (389-05-021) LOVOI. 19152 De Havilland Drive; -Appeal by aforesaid property owner of an Administrative decision denying the removal of a Canary Island Pine tree at the noted address. (LATH VASUDEVAN) Associate Planner Lata Vasudevan presented the staff report as follows: • Advised that during the processing of an Administrative review of a single-story addition to an existing single-family residence, the Arborist's report determined that a Canary Island Pine located within the proposed footprint of this addition was worth preserving therefore the Administrative decision was to require the preservation of this tree. • Added that the property owner appealed this decision to require the retention of this tree. • Explained that the Commission shall use the criteria in the Code in formulating its decision on this appeal. Commissioner Hunter told staff that this tree actually looks like a Monterey Pine and that it actually looked quite brown during the site visit although this is likely a part of the needle drop that occur during the summer. Chair Nagpal opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Mr. Paul Lovoi, Property Owner and Appellant, 19152 De Havilland Drive, Saratoga: • Informed the Commission that he has owned this property for 27 years and it is a 13,000 square foot lot. • Added that they have been planning for this remodel for years now. • Said that this particular tree actually fell over years ago and he simply propped it back up. This tree also nearly died during the drought and that they have been good stewards of their trees over the years. • Explained that there are nine Ordinance sized trees on this parcel and by removal of this tree he is not denuding the local neighborhood of trees. • Said that his back neighbor has a large lot with a large stand of Redwood trees. He is .proposing to plant an additional Coast Redwood on his property to join this existing grove. • Reported that there are only two directions they can go in with their addition to the rear and toward Cox Avenue, which is to the north and east sides of his property. • Said that they are proposing to go to the north with an expansion of their kitchen and addition of a study. Their home is an Eichler that needs updating. • Said he is available for questions and assured that he is willing to plant a nice replacement tree for this tree. • Added that this is the only non-native tree on his property. Commissioner Cappello reminded Mr. Paul Lovoi of the discussion during the site visit about the possibility of modifying the addition to keep this tree. He asked Mr. Paul Lovoi if anything had been done to address this possibility. Planning Commission Minutes for August 24, 2005 Page 3 Mr. Paul Lovoi said that the Arborist has imposed an 11-foot perimeter around this tree and they would have to reduce the size of their kitchen and study additions. This tree needs to be eight feet to the north. Commissioner Cappello said that this tree interferes with the existing house as far as the proposed perimeter. Mr. Paul Lovoi said that there is approximately 10 feet distance right now. Commissioner Rodgers said that there is a fair amount of setback between the kitchen and side of the house. She suggested moving the bulk of the house away from this pine. Mr. -Paul Lovoi said that they are building as far as possible with required setbacks. Commissioner Rodgers said that there is room to take the kitchen out but perhaps the den and living room additions can be pushed back further. Mr. Paul Lovoi said that they would not likely do a study in that case because they want a square useable room. He pointed out that pine trees are dying in the area. Commissioner Hunter pointed out that this is not a great area for Monterey Pines. Mr. Paul Lovoi agreed saying that they are not native to this area. Commissioner Rodgers asked why the growth of the limbs appears stunted. Mr. Paul Lovoi said he is not sure but perhaps due to the fact that the tree fell over years ago. Chair Nagpal closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Commissioner Hunter expressed her appreciation for the City's staff and Arborist's interest in saving a tree but that she thinks this particular tree can go. There is no need to preserve it, as it is not a particularly nice looking tree. The Lovois should be able to enjoy their new kitchen and live it up. Commissioner Rodgers: • Pointed out the factors in the Code that must be met including the condition of the tree; necessity due to damage or threatened damage; topography; number of other trees and effect; age and number of trees; alternatives to retaining; any other reason and necessity. • Said that in her opinion the condition of this tree is okay, there is no damage or threat of damage requiring the removal; there is no unusual topography; the tree is underneath existing tree canopy. However, retaining this does make for an awkward addition and the need to implement post and beam construction for that addition in order to retain this tree. Therefore there is no alternative to removing the tree in order to allow this addition. • Stated her agreement with the comments made by Commissioner Hunter. , • Expressed her support for granting this appeal to allow the removal of this Canary Island Pine. • Planning Commission Minutes for August 24, 2005 Page 4 Commissioner Schallop: • Said he agreed with both Commissioners Hunter and Rodgers. • Reminded that there are plenty of healthy trees on this lot. • Pointed out that the applicant is offering to plant a replacement tree. • Said that removal of this tree offers this property owner his only option for remodeling his home. Stated that the Commission does not need to make a majority of the findings. Any one finding can be used to justify the removal. Recommended approval of this appeal. • Commissioner Rodgers agreed. Commissioner Kundtz: • Expressed appreciation to Mr. Paul Lovoi for his willingness to plant a Coast Redwood. • Stated his support for granting this appeal. • Said that there is a trade off issue in allowing this property owner to maximize the design of their addition versus retention of this one tree. • Stated .that on balance, this owner should be allowed to enjoy maximization of their new residential addition design. Commissioner Cappello agreed. Chair Nagpal: • .Reiterated her appreciation to staff for fighting for every tree. • Assured that this Commission would not support every tree coming down but rather will look at these requests on a case-by-case basis. • Said that she would support this appeal as necessary findings for support can be met. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Hunter, seconded by Commissioner Kundtz, the Planning Commission granted an Appeal (Application #06-020) overturning the Administrative decision denying the removal of a Canary Island Pine tree on property located at 19152 De Havilland Drive with the added condition to plant a new Redwood tree at the back of the property, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Cappello, Hunter, Kundtz, Nagpal, Rodgers and Schallop NOES: None ABSENT: Uhl ABSTAIN: None *** • PUBLIC HEARING -ITEM NO. 2 APPLICATION #04-177(386-35-069) NEXTEL, 19550 Prospect Avenue (12033 Miller Avenue -Church of the Ascension): - Nextel requests Use Permit approval to locate a Planning Commission Minutes for August 24, 2005 Page 5 wireless facility at the aforesaid address. The project consists of the installation and operation i of concealed cellular antennas. Related equipment cabinets will be installed in a proposed enclosed area attached to one of the buildings on the property. (LATA VASUDEVAN) Associate Planner Lata Vasudevan presented the staff report as follows: • Advised that Nextel is seeking approval to place a wireless facility at the Church of the Ascension. • Described the installation as consisting of a 262 square foot enclosure surrounded by an eight-foot high wall near Warner Hall. Additionally, Nextel would have 80 square feet of lease space on a landscape island for placement of an artificial tree that would contain 12 panel antennas. This antenna is known as a mono-pine. • Explained that several revisions to the proposed appearance of the tree have been reviewed. • Reminded that last year the Commission approved the placement of a mono-pine at the Prince of Peace Church. • Said that staff has requested additional foliage that begins at the 12 foot point of the trunk instead of the proposed 20 foot point to start placing foliage. Staff feels that this added foliage would greatly improve the appearance. • Reported that the appearance of these tree antennas varies. One in Palo Alto has more foliage than the one at the Prince of Peace Church in Saratoga. • Said that she researched conditions imposed by other cities regarding appearance and maintenance. • Said that the Arborist studied potential impacts and made recommended conditions. • Said that this is a new type of antenna for Saratoga. • Reminded that health and safety issues are not an issue for the Commission due to FCC regulations. • Recommended approval. • Reported that there is significant opposition to this application by neighbors to the north of the proposed site. Commissioner Rodgers thanked Planner Lata Vasudevan for her research and conditions. She asked if it would be possible to see a sample of the branches. Planner Lata Vasudevan presented a sample board for the Commissioners to review. Commissioner Rodgers pointed out that the neighbors are questioning the -need for this facility at this location. Director John Livingstone said that the applicant is asked to substantiate their need for this location. Commissioner Hunter asked whether having a child attempt to climb this phony tree would represent a health and safety issue. Chair Nagpal asked about other locations along Prospect. Planning Commission Minutes for August 24, 2005 Page 6 Planner Lata Vasudevan said that at Lawrence and Saratoga there are three sets of antennas on a tower there. Chair Nagpal-asked if there are others further down Lawrence. Planner Lata Vasudevan said that the applicant could elaborate, as she is not sure. Commissioner Hunter reminded that a cell site has been located at the railroad tracks. Commissioner Rodgers pointed out that the coverage map provided is black and white although the key says that colors represent the coverage. Planner Lata Vasudevan said that the applicant has a color copy. Commissioner Cappello said that perhaps asking for branches to start at 12 feet instead of 20 might create a public safety concern and that perhaps 20 feet is done to prevent climbing. Planner Lata Vasudevan said that this is a good question for the applicant. Commissioner Hunter asked if there are plans for a chain link fence at the base of this tree antenna. Planner Lata Vasudevan replied no. Chair Nagpal opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 2. Mr. Christian Stansky, Nextel Representative: • Said he can attest to Nextel's need for this site to provide coverage. • Assured that they would not be asking for this site if it were not needed. • Said that Nextel's RF Engineer is present this. evening for questions.: • Said that they are attempting to achieve seamless coverage for their customers and they need to fill in areas where there are coverage gaps. • Stated that this is a more difficult task in residential zones and that this church is an ideal site. It is 1.1 miles from Lawrence and .85 miles from DeAnza. It is zoned for Quasi Public use. • Advised that it is common for carriers to approach churches for placement of cell sites.. • Said that there are no existing towers in this location and they need amono-pine to get the height needed. • Reported that there are a lot of factors taken into consideration in site selection. They have a black hole or an area with a lack of coverage. • Said that when they selected the church they also scouted out all other possible locations in the area. • Advised that the church was amiable to the lease. It has a large site in the heart of the area where Nextel's coverage is lacking. • Said that the most ideal placement on this site is near other pines where it will blend in. Planning Commission Minutes for August 24, 2005. Page 7 • Said that they had looked at the installation at Prince of Peace. This is a better situation than that. It is a better location. • Reminded that this has undergone a 1.5-year design process. • Assured that they are happy to comply with any conditions imposed. • Said that they will run bark all the way up to the top and place shrubs at the base to surround it. • Said that this is not a hasty process and that a lot goes into the selection of a site including planning, leasing and constructability on that site. • Reported that a flagpole antenna was offered as an alternative but the neighbors did not prefer that option. • Said that they obtained 32 letters of support for the mono-pine. • -Said that they had investigated co-location possibilities in the area and found none. They have the ability to accommodate co-location at this site in the future. • Said that he is happy to provide real trees to further screen and mitigate this mono-pine. • Reported that the neighbor with the best line of site of this mono-pine is-the church. • Reminded that wireless is here to stay and that they try to integrate as best they can into a community. • Stated his availability for questions. Commissioner Cappello asked what is meant by seamless coverage. He asked about the extent of the gap in coverage. He said that it appears that between Highway 85 and Lawrence there is no gap in coverage for in car service but there is difficulty from in home. Mr. Kevin Curry, Radio Frequency Engineer, Nextel: • Said that problems include garbled sound, dropped calls and/or no ability to make a call or use the walkie-talkie function offered by Nextel. Commissioner Cappello asked Mr. Kevin Curry if he could provide any data on the number of complaints received about unsatisfactory coverage in this area. Mr. Kevin Curry said that he did not have this data with him this evening but that Nextel does use such data to determine where the need is. Commissioner Rodgers asked about use of repeaters. Mr. Kevin Curry said that height is still needed as well as two antennas and distance between them. Chair Nagpal asked why they couldn't install at the Prospect and Lawrence site. Mr. Kevin Curry said that it would cause interference. Commissioner Cappello asked if this interference would be with their own network and not with other carriers. Mr. Kevin Curry replied yes. Planning Commission Minutes for August 24, 2005 Page 8 Commissioner Rodgers pointed to two pie-shaped wedges representing coverage areas depicted along Highway 85. Commissioner Cappello said that without a transmitter the area of coverage is quite short. He asked if taking that into the other direction would it cover the entire area needed. Commissioner Hunter asked why Highway 85 was not considered. Commissioner Cappello said that he trusts that Nextel is optimizing existing sites before constructing new ones. He asked if there are other gaps in Saratoga and for future plans for cell sites in the future. Mr. Kevin Curry said that there is a gap in coverage on Highway 9 between Los Gatos and Saratoga. Mr. Ray Muzzy, 19518 Eric Drive, Saratoga: • Said that he is here for two reasons. One is to represent himself. The other is to represent 49 other homeowners from his neighborhood and the surrounding area. This represents 79 percent of the impacted zone. • Said that this proposed installation has impacts on streets such as Eric Drive, Candy Lane, Miller Avenue, Ashton and Terrance Avenue. • Questioned why neighbors just learned about this proposal two weeks ago when it has been underway for 1.5 years. • Said that he is surprised at such short notice on such important activities. • Added that the description on the notice sent was not very descriptive. • Reported that representatives from the church talked to some locals as well as to their parishioners. However, the people within the impact zone are the ones who count. • Said that 49 people have listed their concerns and these concerns need to be addressed before a final decision can be made. • Questioned why a commercial venture should be located in a residential area. • Said that there are four areas of concern. One is the idea of this commercial venture in this area. The second is the impacts on the zoning. The third is that this tree looks artificial. The fourth is that this is the wrong location and that there are other viable placements on this site. • Stated that since the neighbors took time to fill out forms, their concerns should be heard and addressed before a final decision is made. • Suggested that this process be slowed down, as the neighborhood has only been aware of this proposal for two weeks. • Recounted that he had sent out an email seeking cell service vendors with coverage in his area. Sprint replied that they could offer excellent coverage. • Announced that Sprint and Nextel recently merged. Ms. Donna Muzzy, 19518 Eric Drive, Saratoga: • Said that she has lived at this same address for 38 years. • Stated that she is active in Saratoga activities and takes an interest in her neighborhood. Planning Commission Minutes for August 24, 2005 Page 9 • Said that she wants this to stay as a residential neighborhood and that she does not want a fake tree. • Said that this area mainly has Redwood trees. • Stated that this is a poor location and that this would not be safe for children in the neighborhood. Mr. Bill Ness, 19537 Eric Drive, Saratoga: • Said that 22 of the 30 people who supported Nextel's request are out of the area or members of this church. • Said that he is disappointed, mad and feels betrayed. • Stated that he has lived in this town for 40 years, 37 of those years on Ashton Court and the last three on Eric Drive. • Said that he can see this location from his front door. • Reported that a realtor told him that this installation will degrade the value of his property by $50,000 and that he must disclose that this cell site is a source of radiation. Mr. Paul Fontenot, 19537 Eric Drive, Saratoga: • Said that he visited the 849 Pollard cell site that is co-located with Sprint. • Reported that there are five nearby Nextel -sites and five nearby Sprint sites. With their merger, these companies have 10 sites in the area. • Questioned the need for this installation. Mr. Tom Ness 19537 Eric Drive, Sarato a: 9 • Expressed the irony of having the first item on tonight's agenda be the removal of a real tree and the second item on the agenda being-the addition of a fake tree. • Said that he grew up in Saratoga. • Questioned the need for this cell site and suggested the need for independent verification of the claims made by Nextel. • Questioned whether this is the best location on this site itself. It would be the first thing seen at the corner of Miller. • Suggested that this cell site would be better located on a street with faster traffic such as Prospect. • Disagreed with the staff report's contention that this will not be visible from most residences. • Said that most of the people in the impacted zone are against this installation. Actually, all but one is against. Commissioner Rodgers asked Mr. Tom Ness if he has cell phone capability from his house and whether it is important to him to have cell phone service available from his home. Mr. Tom Ness replied yes. Mr. Roy Cook, 12.305 Candy Court, Saratoga: • Said that he has resided at this location for 40 years. It is located off of Miller. • Said that he is a realtor here to support Mr. Muzzy and Mr. Ness. Planning Commission Minutes for August 24, 2005 Page 10 • Pointed out that California real estate law requires the disclosure of any negative feature of a property. This cell site would scare some people off and could affect the sale and appreciation in value of this property. • Recommended that if the cell site must be located on this property that it be placed in the parking lot rather than at the corner. Ms. Cheriel Jensen, 13737 Quito Road, Saratoga: • Said that she and her husband recently saw one of these artificial antenna trees when driving down Highway 80 and nearly drove off the road. • Said that this would be awful. • Stated that using a cell phone in the car is just like being a drunk driver. • Said that cells phones are not needed when there are landlines available. Mr. Doug Snyder, 1370 Merrivale West Square: • Said that he is a real estate broker and general contractor. • Said that he sold a home that had a transmission tower behind in within four days. The tower didn't affect the sales price. • Pointed out that this mono-pine is not an eyesore and will be tucked in the back. • Said that he has been involved with the Church of the Ascension since it was built. • Stated that people tend to get upset and agitated. • Assured that radiation and property value issues are no problem with this installation. S Reported that he is a member of a homeowners association where people can agree on a paint color. Mr. Jerry Streb, 1307 Regency Drive, San Jose: • Stated that he is a member of the parish. • Said that four of the seven closest residents are supportive of this request. • Said that those who changed their opinion did so due to radiation information provided by Bill Ness. • Pointed out that Planner Lata Vasudevan has added conditions to better blend this tree into the environment. • Said that there is a lot of emotion on this issue. • Asked the Planning Commission to consider facts on this issue and reminded that a large number of neighbors do support this. Commissioner Kundtz asked Mr. Jerry Streb if his answer would be the same if the church were not going to be paid $2,000 per month in leasing fees. Mr. Jerry Streb said that if the need were presented he would support the neighbors and the City. Commissioner Schallop asked if other locations on site had been discussed. . Mr. Jerry Streb said that they considered the west side of Warner Hall. However, the closer to Prospect the better the coverage would be. He said that it is technically feasible to locate elsewhere on the property and he is not opposed to considering alternate placement. Planning Commission Minutes for August 24, 2005 Page 11 • Commissioner Rodgers asked about the consideration of a flagpole as an alternative to the mono-pine. Mr. Jerry Streb said that they considered and would accept that idea if it is the consensus. They did a straw pole and the breakdown was two-thirds in support for the tree and one-third in support of the flagpole. Mr. Hui Lin, 19617 Ashton Court, Saratoga: • Said that he has health issue concerns. • Recounted how in 2002 he had placed an offer on a home that he withdrew once he learned of a nearby tower. • Stated his belief that long-term exposure increases cancer rates and he has two young children. • Said that some people use hands-free headsets to avoid exposure of the cell phone too close to their head. • Stated he does not want to risk his family. • Said he has no problem with Nextel achieving good coverage but he is not here to support Nextel's business but rather to protect his own interest. Mr. Ron Schoengold, 1900 Saratoga Glen Place, Saratoga: • Said that he is a long-time member of this church. • • Said he is also a trained scientist and epidemiologist working on cancer prevention over the last 35 years. • Added that he is not an RF specialist. • Said that he has read many studies on issues of high voltage lines versus radio frequency. • Added that he has used a cell phone for 20 years. • Said that his review of the literature and the fact that the FCC has taken jurisdiction over the issue of radio frequency leaves him believing that no documented studies have shown an effect. • Said that this is a young industry and there is not a lot of long-term data. It takes more .than 20 years to obtain that data. • Stated that we live with an imperfect amount of knowledge. While there may be some risk, there is also a tremendous value and benefit. • Said he hopes that a solution can be found that accommodates everyone. Mr. Christian Stansky, Nextel Representative: • Stressed that it is important to understand that 1.5 years of review has been done. • Assured that they are trying to play by the rules and provide a needed service. • Said that this church is also a part of this area and they have property rights. • Said that providing greater service to the majority is important. • Stated that they would mitigate visual concerns using landscaping. • Pointed out that wireless is here to stay, as its capabilities are unbelievable. • Said that it is odd to see this lack of support for technological upgrades here in the Silicon Valley. Planning Commission Minutes for August 24, 2005 Page 12 • Said that Nextel has the right to provide service and- complete its network in order to compete. • Said that they are not trying to be the bad guy and not trying to wreck this neighborhood. • Said that having cell sites located at churches is prevalent today. Cell companies like to do so in order to provide funding to a church. • Stated that he understands that this is a contentious hearing. Commissioner Schallop asked if this specific coverage upgrade is still needed with the recent Nextel/Sprint merger. Mr. Christian Stansky said that the two use different frequencies and have different customer bases. He added that many types of businesses use cell service, as do families. He assured that Nextel's network does indeed need this location. Commissioner Rodgers asked about Nextel versus Sprint's technologies. Mr. Christian Stansky said that they both use different frequencies right now. Mr. Kevin Curry said that they hope to integrate in the future but this merger with Sprint occurred just last week. Any merger of service is years off. Commissioner Schallop asked Mr. Kevin Curry how many antennas would be located on this tree. Mr. Kevin Curry replied six right now with potential for a maximum of 12 in the future. Commissioner Schallop asked if this is the most realistic tree option. Mr. Kevin Curry replied that they are getting better all the time. Commissioner Rodgers pointed out the recent experience of Mr. Muzzy who emailed Sprint regarding coverage in this area and was told it is excellent. is Nextel's coverage not excellent in this area? Mr. Kevin Curry replied right. Commissioner Rodgers asked if the walkie-talkie distance is the same as cell service distance. Mr. Kevin Curry said that every Nextel customer has the walkie-talkie feature. It is another part of the phone and offers direct connect. Chair Nagpal closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 2. • Commissioner Hunter: Planning Commission Minutes for August 24, 2005 Page 13 • Said that she has been on the Planning Commission for a long time and there are a lot of cellular carriers in Saratoga. There are a number of carriers at West Valley College as well as on Lawrence Expressway. • Said that some requests have been denied if found to not fit into the area. • Stated that this installation does not strike her as right. • Said that with this recent merger, we are not sure what will happen. • Expressed reservations about a plastic tree. • Said that she is afraid that this matter must go back to the drawing board and suggested a continuance. • Pointed out that the artificial tree at Prince of Peace Church is way back on the site within a grove of trees. On the other hand, this is a very visible location that she cannot accept. Commissioner Cappello: • Said that a continuance is in order here. • Said that he has no issue with the location as long as the tree is tucked back from the street between buildings and among real trees. • Said that other locations on site are worse and would offer a clear view from Prospect. • Said that a health standpoint is not an issue. • Said that he lives in the neighborhood and is not concerned and that required findings have been met. • Suggested more information on what other options are available for coverage in this area as he is not satisfied with what he has seen. S • Stated he is in favor of a continuance. Commissioner Rodgers: • Said that this location is appropriate as far as zoning. • Reminded that a Conditional Use Permit allows a structure on a site that is not zoned for commercial uses with conditions. • Said that studies show no significant health risks regarding health and safety issues. • Reiterated that the Federal government has acted to take away local authority to consider the issue of health impacts. • Said that as far as location and aesthetics, she is happy with the tree and the proposed location and that the height of the mono-pine is lower than the trees behind it. • Said that as far as bulk and size, another solution is a flagpole. However, a tree is a better disguise than a flagpole. • Admitted that she is not sure what can be done about property values. However a lack of cell phone coverage would be a negative to many potential property buyers. • Said that the there is not enough information to consider the possibility of locating this antenna on another location that would cover Prospect Avenue. • Announced that she cannot vote to accept this application and supports a continuance. Commissioner Schallop: • Said he agrees with Commissioner Rodgers except for the need for more information on • alternative cell sites. • Added that the applicant has shown alternatives and has made a sufficient showing of need. Planning Commission Minutes for August 24, 2005 • Stated that the issue is does it fit in. Page 14 Said that. he does not think that consensus is likely even with the alternate use of a flagpole. Said that an up or down vote should be taken on the information we have. Commissioner Kundtz: • Said that if Nextel has evaluated and says that -there is no alternative available, he too would support an up or down vote this evening. • Said he is inclined to approve but located the tree on the west side of the building amongst the Eucalyptus trees. _ • Suggested adding real pine trees in the area. • Said if Nextel wants more time he will support the continuance. If not, he would support a vote this evening. Chair Nagpal: • Said that optional locations have been reviewed today. • Stated that she would like to have Nextel say they cannot locate elsewhere and must have this location but she tends to support their proposed location or near existing Eucalyptus trees. • Said that when comparing the flagpole to the mono-pine, she prefers the tree but that she supports a more attractive looking tree than the one approved at Prince of Peace Church. • Said that she feels more time is needed. • Reiterated that safety issues are not within the Commission's purview. • Suggested that the neighbors could probably come up with a solution as to where to place this on this site and how best to mitigate its placement and supported giving them the opportunity to do so. Commissioner Rodgers asked Commission Schallop if he believes that Nextel has met the burden that there is no other viable location. She outlined the ordinance sections in discussing the application. Commissioner Schallop replied that he must rely on the information provided by RF engineers much like the Commission relies on the Arborist for tree advice. He said that the Code does not require that all alternatives be exhausted. Said that he assumes that the need for a cell site exists at-this location. Commissioner Hunter advised those in attendance that the members of the Planning Commission all live in the City of Saratoga and are acting as citizen representatives of the community. If we feel something is not acceptable, we should state it that way. She added that she felt that too much consideration is being given to Nextel. Commissioner Schallop said he did not disagree with that. Director John Livingstone said that if the motion is to be for a continuance he suggests that it be continued to a date uncertain. When the next hearing is set, staff will re-notice the meeting. Planning Commission Minutes for August 24, 2005 Page 15 Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Kundtz, seconded by Commissioner Cappello, the Planning Commission CONTINUED TO A DATE UNCERTAIN consideration of a Conditional Use Permit (Application #04-177) to allow the location of a wireless facility at the Church of the Ascension on property located at 12033 Miller Avenue, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Cappello, Kundtz, Nagpal, Rodgers and Schallop NOES: Hunter ABSENT: Uhl ABSTAIN: None *** DIRECTOR'S ITEMS There were no Director's Items. COMMISSION ITEMS There were no Commission Items. COMMUNICATIONS There were no Communications Items. ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING Upon motion of Commissioner Hunter, seconded by Commissioner Kundtz, Chair Nagpal adjourned the meeting at 9:27 p.m. to a Study Session immediately following this Regular Meeting and subsequently to the next Regular Planning Commission meeting of September 14, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. MINUTES PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY: Corinne A. Shinn, Minutes Clerk • • • Attachment 3 • Y. F ~ ~ ~ .; ~ ~;, . ~ i a - 4~ ., }:. LM ~ ~ ~ ~ % !` ,.~, 1 5~ ~ 3 .. ~~ ~ ~® ~~ --~~, P. ~'~pose~d ~,~ ~ , . -~ ~~~~ ~F~ 4 y,~ycr~ 'Ei.Ts t`w.'"tea'°_~"" ) X~•- X019. ,__~ ~_.,.?___~ t - ~' ~'iy 3 "`"1. "`~ x-' . = gyp '[ark <;.r s ~ ~~ ,. _ ~ - "tom' ~:~ ~ ~ y s H~ ~. CA-2146G North Hwy 85 19550 Prospect Rd. c.,.-.,+,.,~., rn oFn~n ;: a~ . :~:: ,.: ~ it .~~ s xr~i~ ~f'" ~ ,~,,..~ .x ,v. _ ,~ s~ x~.+ V 3 0 rf O N ^~ Y r'h 0 T~T \V TNT \V ].i rf ~_ ^~ \/ O ~_ O~ 0 0 ~~ 0 m ~' v m • • 0 _o N ~. ~_ O O -~ fD O O N <D Q. fD fD n O C n .+ O n ~. N N fD fD O O _~ ~~ ~0. O ~« 3 O D N n fD N_ O~ Q !D C] • • ? V r v i 4. . s ~~ 7 .! y~C ~ ~3j;' _ M .i ~~~1 ~ ~,~« 19550 Prospect Rd. ® ~ ® CA-2146G North Hwy 85 ® ~~ Saratoga, CA 95070 extel ~ _ N ~ iar ~a 0 0 0 0 -~ 0 0 N fD Q T~ \^V \I O ^~ l! y 0 N N fD fD O O 3 (D N ~-r -y, .t O <D _~ ~~ d'0; O .~ • • 'D O 0 c O O -~ fD 0 .a 0 N (D Q .-~ fD fD n O C n O 3 n '=r N N fD fD O O _~ ~~ UQ (D N ~_ O 3 ~Q O N fD n r+ O Q. • • 0 ~+ O _~ ~. 0 O -* .+ 3 cD O .a O N (D Q (D !D n O n~ r+ O n i-r N N lD fD O O ~~ ~Gl fD N N .-r ~_ O 3 -s O N !D n rr O Q _~ ~ ~ c.o o a ° v N ... i o e~-I M_n ~ Ct"J ;~ >• O b O O I I I I H N 6 la ~_ ~,~, . ~ ~ 9 0 ~ ~ nnn <_ ~ I ~z ; °'~ 4i m o ~ F~ O ¢° ~ 0 0 0 o vii °tn °- K ti - n `" ti c J N N¢ N n Q W H O R s~ to 8 o w-~ rl~ r ~ UY ~ ~^ o G~°- ~mwN~ C7 00~ 8~ ~ o~ ~ ~ ~ m N ~ z o~,~ ~ ~ ~ W w ¢ ¢ m rn3 ~s o ' j ~ F m N ~ d O U °•u5~ •~ ad z ~ } m ~n to ~ ~ IJ-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I C. ~ y f~ E ~ w ai = ~ o H ¢ ° ~ m ° ° ~ ~ .S ~ °~ o f ,n ~ z F- N N¢ H ~ v v z Y ~ ~ z m m z z v c i ~ 3 a~ O¢ phi Q Q z ii `~ ~ ~~ ¢jQ~ ¢ w <\`/1C ~n w rw`~ ~n N ~ Z U .-- (n (n ~ Z `~ z ~ U D U V V V V N = c o t°.t ¢ U ~ O !n N U O 0 ~ ~ . V 0 T o~ ~ U ~_ e-® - - - t ~ e O /~~~ W ~ o 1 1 ® N '.. ~--~ IL~LJI '~I W W ~ ~^~i ~ W c~ W z V J OQ oC2 O I__1_ 1 I 1 z W V J ~L11 Q • • Z 5 a to w 0 U O \ Z F ¢ O a z F z U 1w- W N Z ' w ¢ W O , J ~ r N ¢ Z ~ w1 U ¢ 3 J a ~, X < a<w W o a a F z w ~'' > '^ J a ¢ o w ~' o o ~ ~ ° v i t n w rr a~ W ~ H ~ ~ O y w o F~ rn w V~s1 Z N tl N N Q I It J J ¢ ¢ W } H ~ N J Z U 4 ~ !n Z N O O z° ¢_ F d OmO~i~ U w N (7 ¢O~ 1=n O~ ¢U~rn= ~ ~ E K O~ m O N ¢ ~N ¢ p ~¢ UmOV UQ~rm O~jpWN OV K /~, ~ J ~~ JVJ m O 7 ~/ m NUS UWVWM UUmW¢~ Z O LL > O ¢ ~J ~ I JF-mZ I rn 2 2 Q 4W¢ ¢ = c aoZ'i p~~~m oXwO~rn o s .. 01-¢ ZNO¢rn WW~~Ua V) v> O I¢ a KZ fpKZ~ X ONZ ZN t0 a z v O1v¢iv¢i ~~~°~ zo~3°~ n ~ i- ~ U N w w m ~ ~ o Z Z~ ~ ¢ 7 O ¢ .. 4 w J Z 7 w N FW- 4W- ~ d 0_ U d in rn ~ O ¢ ¢ O ~ ~ , o a Nm o ~ c~ rW-. m N ~ I p t` N N U A N N ~ N .... Q O ao¢<'~ W- fY N(n v 4 rn 0 m~ O1Z ~a F- rn t Nm z °~m N °ti m z m ~O1 ~ Q °°rnN~ ~mY'~~ z~U~n J z O ooo a,Q ~iN<o,~'~ ~a3,`~'~ Z ~V.i4 2-~3Uv4 ~Vv4 w J ¢ U !n ~ O (7 3AV NOSNH01` z ~ o ' ~ 3ntl SfllLL 5 Q o N m AVM V13d ° Y Q 3nv a3 nlrv ~ U ti a z ¢ ¢ O E AtlM p zL StlW0aNtl0 a H ~ w 3ntl Naatli w Y a ~ V- Z O W ~ ~ ~ U a° ~ 3niaa Q N3i~tlatls ~ m ~ _ Z U 3 ~c°~ ~~=~ a ~ W Z ~ z ~ w o ~ ~ m ~Ge i ~ a - z z e °wp o 0 N ~ w z ~attp'+ z a ~ w W ~ ~ ~33 0 ~ ~ 3 a n • W F- W H 01 1~0f C U~ FW- FW- H IW- H F F- U ~+JO WJ~ to ~ U~ ~ t~~ O FO~f 00. * a o Q c Q Q Q tp O JWVI JWW JWW O q D D C G C Y U U U I 7 f~l~ ~N ~~ j C 3KO J J O O \ ~OQ s}f~ C mmMM UapWQ a n 6~ N a N WQO W~_ ~Q_ M \ ONU O^'\ '~ ~ C ;<NN 7 NU m ~~^ = a Q U ~ ZdQ Kd7 Kd7 ~ ~ Z ~ MO O O mt"tm 1 N S U Q ~ `~$~ ~ H V~ U ~ ^ O O ~1 O ~ 2 ~C ~ ~ ~ z F ~% a uu'i ~ ~~~~oyd 5~! a z U z r m ° \ \ J L . ~ V Q~ O¢ ~ E ... m a a o w ~ m O \ so ~ h ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ 2 W o f "''zJ. c ~ m z s~ w z Y °i ° ~ ~ z m ~ (~j Z vU =3a~ a z z z N ° Q W w W c=il N J N 2 U?~ d O U N M ~ N N ~2 W ~i01 W w aw o ~aQ 2 o Q w y ~ Z ~ O "~, W W¢ W LL m m W ~ U y O W °m~~'vw~~2 W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' a ~~~40 W `°2ti=~ ~ QQi~ W h ~ ~ ~2 ~vl3~ox K ~S" O W ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~~~y! W ~ SWi W ~ W W ~ N 30 ~ ~ O ~ C~ O `" ~W 2000m~ F; G'i Ni! ~2 G U ~/1 ~ 3 ri ri~m~$~ W h N ~¢ O W gg¢ v 2 - ~ j_ ~~ ~ ~~ 0 0 2 2 0 W ''~ Q °o~yo~~W I I i I 00 00 ~ WmW°w~a~`W' W ~ ~ 0 :`o~~-o-kt~~~~m~m~ 2Q 2W J i,''$~nOcn-+2h ~ III I O W ~~ D j`"4~~V ~v4j0 O¢ OQ ~ W ¢^ 2 2 0 2 W 0 4~ OW O ~a00WvWj2~ mJ ~ ~OSWI~WR~W ¢W ¢~ p atiOJWOU~~ ~ ti W ~iU ~i vpCy~¢¢tiv~i pJ C~iS~c3 ~~-~ .lsb - _ ~ ` Z I tl A e ~~~~_ ~~_ ~2 W ~~ i ~~~ Y ~ 4 ~ V ~ \ , ~~oeyaegr @NO I 3~'v~./ yam. I ~ ~j4 I x (~~ f 1 I I 1 '/ 9 ~ ~~y¢ a ~ ~~ 'f~ 4 ~ /~ __` \~~~ I 0 / ~ a \ ~y~ I / ~ ~ ti^ E l a ~~/~I~l~~\~ ~~~hIP~~\~ ~ , a I ~ `~ \ ~/ ~ ~ 's s _ ~/ ~ ~ / ~ I ~ ~ / \ / I \~/------~ i I ~ ~~ ,. _, i I I e ~ • • • ~~ ~ a W ..1 J .l Wl N~~ w~ w _ q Q~Q~~ ~~ Of I~ Oi ~~ H H Iw- '- H H C7 W J~ IaI J W ¢ W O V °1 n~ O °~ ~~ ~i~v' */ D G Qp G O C 0 Q 7 JUIn JU JU O O ~p n~ •c omao inU y~ ~ so o ~ d 3SO ~a~ Zi¢~ ~. ~ i' \ oMti v~ o` J H m .°~.., ~mwd ~_~ - a i' U ~ za°¢ SaU Sam Liu" ~ a o s.-, _ '` 2N ` W o cu~`m° •°-~tailU ~ ,_.$n ~ yr C¢j U ~ ~` ~ ~ nl ° rn O~ W vMj rpi ° mxr°f N=O ~ ~ a a in v `o ~, ,~ ~ s ~ a o o ~ Q ~ I ~tpil< ~ 'c <z H,^ O?aO ifs - ~ .`` ~ z O r ° \ \ c7 h V w ~ J p ~ 2 k ° °~ "--' ~' I°n < ~'ods e a i v z r m ° N ~ ~ p W ~ V G k Q d' H O~ m z E "Sw°`' mC a ° ~ v m ° \ \ ~ ~ \ ~ Z ~ m ~¢ R m a o m3Ox ern z v o w z Y ~ v ~ m o Z vU =3ira. a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ = a w ~ _ 'J~ N K U? ~J' d ~ U N M N N N O ~ x ~ 2 W WP.WW O ~ ~V ~ y O ~'W ti i~ Z ~ W x~ W W W 2 i~ 2 O ti 2 ~ Oh°~'O ~ W WI's y O ~ ~ h~W ~2"~2 O 2 OpC'1 ~ ~ W W p~~ KUvrO h ~ 2W2 O ~ ¢ W WW2 0 2~ ¢ 2 X 2 2 m v W W p 2 2 > ~ m ~ g v ~ ~ W w ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ _ ~ y ¢ aer"3~ i ~ ~~m~ w c~ ~ '~°'2 w O WWoV o ? ywio ~ ¢~ 3 w~~y ~ 3~Ix,W ¢ g ~°pO ,~ ~ ~0 2 "cWi2^o ~~ti~ o O j~p~ 2 2 j y j W ~ S y q W 3 ~~W2 WtW~~IWi 2 y¢ W 2 2 W h y g j ~ R W tyy N O y h~ W ~~~^ ~ Z rn ~226i W = IWiO y~20 h W a V O I`~W ~ H`OVh ~ U O O W O W m Q ~ O ti t ti ti ~ V W " ~ x a h W m~Wm2 WO ~ W O ~WO^ y W ~~ ~¢ g W~O yrrlyt~i5 O a m x~~Wti ~ ~ y 2 ~o wm w` ~ o =2 Wtr Wmo~ 51515 3 U W ¢ W1Wi00 tiW WSW OW ~ Ocn ~vOiW O N 2 C y ~m ~yW a vvMn W O 2' W W W W Q~ W 2¢ ¢ W W O O K W J ~ 4 z~o~w ~gmgv ~~ u~ om ~ygo 0 0 ~W ~o ~m^i N$~a o ~wo~OV~ ~ C y SOW ~~ v~iJyKV~i =~ ~ ~v0, WOW O j W W V y 4= WOV~i~ ~ti~ti O W 4~ ~W3W0 5y3i15 ''w IJ~. yo ~~u3w y ~ U2p ~~ ~w5° o000 ~ J J U 4Q~U :~Nri e}Yi ~4' , ¢h U~ V ~ .~ ~.~ Q 2 W ¢3 ~4~~ h~i ~tiR W m W mo , W ~ O ~ ,ZSa n~ ~-~^~77/W r ~o ~Ix,~ a~HZ ~ h,~p~ y -- ~ ¢ ~ 2 Q0 WO j ^ = ro N 1 849 ~~\ .OSa ~ U~ RCS ~O~ti 2 I - ~ ALOf:ZZ.S05 "r 3Jy~5, v5 ,et CS[ ~\ 2tt i , W ~ 1ay O 2 y 1 ~2~ 2C~ ~dj UWV2W ¢ I, O I , ~\ ~ ~ O a¢ U p~ W Wyk 2 U y3 ti ~ ti W ti W ~~ y~ pg~ ~UROO ~til~~ 2 I h W U K 2 W W ¢ I ___ ~ `~~ ~ ti'ti tiyWU' 02 Wti~ W O I ,ty° .tC BOO y$> ~ Z Y¢ OOC yq¢R~~ ~N^~' 2y - _-- --I .~- - - -_ __ - _ Nn, Oro'sy - --__ ~ O J ~ ~ R O 0 O O ¢ W O ~ ~ y ~ m ~ ____._ - T- 14y ro- I- ~ 5~- ~2-~ ~ti~~0 -yww¢--Wtr ~ \\- / om~ o I ~ 2 ~ ~~ W C I~I~p O~ ~NooN 2q U ¢ U 2^ C „ ti t^ W j v, v p g - I / \ / _ '•~io'm 1 W W Gi ~o~ q ~ ~ jy1Wi~ NrgiNr`ri wti ~~ R N ~ N \ / \ N oz~ ~ °~o °mo b a s3°o?i mono z~ I \ / \ /~~'C"_"7\ W ~ I ~ ~~o cWiw~ vWi ~°x2~o oo'oo ~¢ I \/ _ U v 2 z~12 2 ¢ ~rn~vy~ J K _y'~ \ / \ Q i ~ ¢~Q a2o- e ~ ctric~5~ ~Nnr °r°n -~-~ a 1 \ / \ / ~ I \~_~, Q I w 1 Z I J~ W ,ern a NO I J h ~ a I d. 1 me O I ~ a 1 W H o 1 W ~ ti~ I N O UOWi ~v~ ~ ~pw I ~ - j 2 v 1 J '. ~~ Z~ ~ ~ ¢ W ~ v Y J OK 2¢ r2 W 2 2 w o ~ I Q ~ W 0 0 ~ ~~ I b W ~ W ~ < ~ V ~ 4 J c`~~ W ~ x~ >~ U w Q '~~ o V c, p~ ~ in J ~ ~ 2 c~ w3oV I Q y p MW W °o v5 Q rya y ft ~ w £ £ Ci ~ m x~~o'~o~ W ~ h ~ OOo ~O WO ti W W I ~ ~y ~ W `" W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'ioaoaoa I> ~ Q ~ W~rn tiV WQ a tiW I ~ Q ~ ~ W ¢ v h h ~ ~~>?m°m° I O ~ W tiW U UW ?~ ti~ 1' ~ W W z h ~ hOvWi >.~ am T~ h D * i I h wl I I I' I y U 4 ?440 4~Wj~ `S'am ~J N I rY ~I ~ ~ 3 1 2 ~ y N~Or°n~ x0 ~p ~~ 2 ¢ 2 W I I I I ~ '6 ~( Pa I.'~ ~~~~~ ~ sU W U24 °jv~ p2 ~`^' UZ¢ 0 i3 ~ 1 I Q j j W W ~ ti W~ W U O ~ O W U O it I U O O O ~ 0 0 O j j m s' O ~ O ti ti ~ ,09'0[Z Q W ZW W ¢ Oa W ~C~ W¢O J ¢¢ O¢ yl AL90,8Z.ZOS Q O y~~~ ~U~ ~2 O W~ O W W O W ~u 1 ^ ~ ~ ¢ Q ~ ~ ti ¢ ~ W > I ~ C m rp.> -` ~tir~=' ~'+!~^-_---,1 G (f() Aso Qul[O Rd ~r.~.' ~.'. I h ~ \~ W t - ~---- '~~ a ~ -17 ayaalj~ iilly/'..~:':.. b"~ "I .a I ~ to o a 'o$ i i _-~,. - _ I+datt •--1 ti~°I I ip '~ ~ p, 1- --Q ~ ~} - o o i Ooa 1~ 7' et1 '•~ a1 9~~~ ~ s~. I ~ ~ {~,~~,.. ~ Glen Haven 0r ti ° ~ t ~ ~` ° 1 - --_... a r--J ~ Mellavood Or--. '-,. -e~' ~ - ,~ ~ P`-~ ~~r~_. o r ~. 1Q aPlsPoaluS , ~ I ~ •_~. ~, , ~~: ~' -..,.;r -- r`j ! b r~ ['- i f-'-J-any ~I~-_ ! j_i;- r.'^ .c ]~t`~x H _ r i G-~- ~ ~~~ wa _ i~IsrAve I i I }-- -~fl ebpaq~,u _[ r ~ _ 1 \ '^"' '~`~t'__t_ ~ ""`"_'?~"_'`". ~', 1.' '` ! Lai ~~` a I ~\ ~~ 'm - 1} I I `r~ElUlsewa[' L t-- r t -c a S ;~ \N IGlsn(moo~+ 1 0 ~,Y -~~--w.= r 1 '~'''-+ l.i-~~"~` °~~:.~~ ms's- 1 W ;;\ F-'-~ y~ !f'~I ~e~'~- ~ l ~~r 'L`~~~-~"~ 'p 'r.li m~~ =~ I cv > o ;~` -Weybum_Ln -, I- Cm ~I °'I ,7,~,; a a~_ io;/.L ~ ,.` I I i h & OEI'.An7a.8Nd^- - ! ° ~-~'O {- :fi--- -~~? mi -~. E - - _ ~ a ~ '_'1 r ~ .~ ~ [ (4 ~ _ 0.'u ,-l~ c~i `y 1 j`~~ m~.~,~ 8 ~ ~_ t< 3 ¢ss ` ~; r._ -mot' ~o ~.; oi~.- ~~ o`'-a~-i. ~ _% 3liN3Ad .177l1~S ,-_ ~ LEI F i ~ ~ I o~~_ -'$.;~ _~"_~ 3' _.7UT,4taoy ~i - ~Lr,. t~ _ N - i t. I • • • - soiruu r-emc ~ I ( N °o in a0 p ~ .. ~ ° H ~°~ c ~ Q ro :~ = a'n ~ ~ I~ w w ~ H N ciz ~ °~ m o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v v v c=n rn -° x x ~ °n Z ,' ~° C J N N m Q LLI ~ O ~ N g $ w _ ~ o ° ~wN ~ 2 Vl U ~ 8~ o ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ F~ viz r "~ o W c i5~ov,~ _ ~d~U °.~ ~ s~ a ~ 'm ~ m m~ w J m a k o C ~ ~S 'iu °..3 Z E ~~z°% F=-- NpOa ~~ ~ < m m ~ Q j ~ ~ ~ ' ~ IfIQH g w r ~ z m m z .-] c ~ .n° o N ¢ °x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ {teae ~ ~ 3 cy.~ri w w vii N a Z vU -3a~., ~UO~NN ? z w G ~~ a ~ _ ~~ w ~ w o~ N C V ti 0 U ~ U N O N N OU pn a ~ m t O I ' '_ iV ~~ ] M = __ ~ L ~ J J J ~j ~ ~ J U J (n 7 V L F O ~-e O ~ I N _~~ ~ U I a~~3z • • • - so/aW,l zv-eLaf .'~ O ,p O O~ ! I ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~ J m :~ ~ `+t'n ~ ~ n Z kl~' k' W ~ k" ~ ~ o o Z a no y~ ' ~ 'moo ~ H~~ ~0000o cn °m ° c x aW n ~t '', v c~ ~' Q N n Q W H O f~^ _. Y VI - °o J O LI UZ o G •-° m I.l r ~ C7 O U ~ ~\d b ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ m~ (!) Q O J z °Y • ~n U 7~ U I-- ~ N :^v C~ ~ Q ~ dO a r N ~ m \ li ~ Q m O } m w ~~ ~ ~ ~ k o a: a ~ Z E ~jwv = O Z ~ ¢ d "' N Z Z F N l(] ¢ F- g U ~[ N m W F ~ Z Z j m Y /~ /J /I /I ~i ¢ w N a "e d~ z vU ~3a~ ZU~NN ~ v ~ ~ ~ ,ZW I ~ W ~~~N Y~^K I J~ N z O w O Q 3 U L] U ~I ~I ~I ~I v, LaJ Q to ~ N U N K V H O O ~ ~ 't _ O '~y (V 1 II I jp I ~_ I ~w_o wn -~O O o II o W~W-= O x N~ 2 J ao N >~~ K: X N b Z y ~ x ~ J K N~ 7 Z ~ O U U I O W U U pin ~~ (7 - ~ p w OvNm J x 2 1 Q 3' UN Q ~ ¢ J w U J Jwol` ~~ mQ= ^O Z. Ul J > Z ~ w 3~O{aW{aJJ X~ XY~ N ~o Z (,~J3 W I w~? OK OOQ~ ZN ZoN \ O .r. O N X OO w ? Q U O N W ~~ W d N Q L]Y aZ.-. d 2 aJ - Q3~~ aUx a~f ~¢¢ d j~3 0 ~¢rz wz~- (%1 f/1 Z Z ~ z k'o~~~ w ~ zwQfO x _ w X ~ Z U ~ w J aW~~ ap ~ m ~ o -~ ~~:. ~ ~ ~ I-zaQ I-a a w ~w~r~ ~:~,`,~~~ ~ zm~~ zQ v w ~ F~`~cs lw ~; ~~~t. ` ~~ -~~\ aowF- Nw /~ 2 Q ~ 3 0 N ~ ~ m / / / v~ v ..a .o-s .s-s ~ „i~-.b ~:' ,%' ~-/ j e w v3atl 3stl3~ s-,oi: - x Q Z. / J O w _. I p i n ~` Z U QJ° J _ 2A O1 Q,M I I lF > W J Z W m0 p - °j x o w?~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ a a3 ~~ wao N 0 - °N I z~a ~ ~ m n cn> moo ~ 30~ _ _.__..._._- ~ Q / ~ ~ r ~ ~ O w J -' .-- \ t O' IW- ~j F F A O /// JI.,I m J JI.~~ J~ m .. a C Z O Z I _ N -_~Z Z_ Z Z O ~' /// x U X X~ X~ J ~ X O N O ~ N . ... ,, _ O []w OUO S / / / ZZ ZZ ZZ 2Fa J Zy W Z j ~ `- _ 'o°o ow ozc°>z ~ ~ ~ N° o~ oo aNO w o~~~ ° ° `-. ~.~ ~•-..._.. wc~~ aN aw w o~- o off`' 03~ o cn~Q w ~, -. .. .__.... -__ ___..__._.._ O Q O Q O I- U J ~~ ~- Z d~ Z N f ~ [CJZ ~w ~z> I tr0 ~w ~O ~~w OOON J awo aJ aQa? / / of a~ as aY/ / ~O w ~OFZ w ==a .Z-.Zl Z ~ ~ ~ ° a ° z ~_~ ~ '.a~ ~ ~ ~ a° =oQ Z O ~ o J Z // JU OJT W W (U I I xwo - ~ W JH //../. W JH Wdr Z J ~ ~ W QO ~~ i ~i ( ~ OC70 X~Q~Zw N O W N M Vl J W awo I / \ I ~~ ~ Z~~oap ~ p l,i J O e 0 ~ 9 Q O ~ ~ Q ~ U ~ Q ~vQ ( ~ \ I w xo O.~ F U d.-K ~ d~ ¢ O~~¢=w OQ- n~ Z ~ N I / ~ ~-- o o ri ,~o N ° o ~ ~ x"'o_I z QytuV ~ o I I ~? a aF-<_ in / x I / ~ I ~Z~ o I I =oQ Q _- -_----_~ ~ ~w-~Z m aWQZQ m . ~ . ~ ~ . J ° Z_ p w Z --- ~°aa~z ~ Q Z z~~oaa Z ~ J Q I I a W ..o-.s o xo~° ~~ ~,a. Z2~ ~,Q w . - J o~ina°vm-i °a I ¢ O Q a C7 0 - - _ a ~ ~ N vwi J I ,. Q _ ~ J } V1 I ° Z M] ._._ ._ .. .... .... .... Q _ __ w~ ~ 8~b2b3S~ Zv zo w --- - oQ I I aN ~~ do ~ =o pN c~Z~ az I =~¢ Q z O U ~ W W aJaz< ^~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J 1 Z p X ~ Iw~a~z W J~ W Q w Gov zw_ zas a0=p ~ F ..Z/t £-.l ..Z~L Z-.9 ..9-,L w ¢ x o ~ ~ N ~O OOOZ I Q. w Q~ o~ina°o y ~^ o I rn tl321tl 3Stl3~ a0-,6 a x Q ~ <? • • i SO/ BZ/ll Ctl-BLO[ ~ O b ~ O O ~ I I ~ I Fo-- ~ a m 0 pN ~ ~ 00 n • yy i3 C ~~ m ~ ~ ^ Z ~ ~~ l~ F- {y~ Y- ~ H lW~ I- W = ~ K O p O M uz ~~ ~ ~~ o o w ~ ~ ~ N M r Q W °i O ~Y~[ER. D ~ D o 0 0 cn rn ° K ce~ °o S (n Z 'rM ~lU (lll ut i ~n ` .O ~ m W N ~ C~ O U ~' IIn p \ \ \ \ Q ~ Z xb 3 W ~ x oo a '~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ w m < Q ~ m ~~ a~ o N Z~ c ~ U ~ O o~,~ . °usimd z ~ Y m m J J ~ \~Il ~ k o ~ w ~ r z ~' ~ ~ m ~ LtJ V ' ..~ c a +% In Z ° o ° h H ~ N~ Q H w v ~ r z - m m Z d a i ¢ c x '~ z vU -3aW O ~ In ~ Z QrnQQ ~' z ~ ~ _ ~ z_ W ~ ¢ 3 U _ _ ~~~ . ~ ~ w w rn rn ri v ] _ p q J ~ N U ° ~ J N U Q Q O Scn3~ ° I • w Z~ ~ tO II v i o z 0 J - O r W N m o \ wQ~ x r N c7 r z . odoF °~ U N - ao ~ ~ tn N o?w ~ Q U a 3 a orr= oN i v aW~~ do N rzaQ r d ° zm5~ zo Q Q O O Q J w J 0- U W r LL W O N (~ Z o J_ ~ m W Q li O M W O J ~` - ~ I (_~ ,' ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ W l0 Q" Q ~ ~ ^ - W ~ ° O N I J W lL U w O ^ ~ N m N r I Q Q ~ W v ~ N O 5 W -~ WJ ~N Wd' Q ¢3 =Z OwU vl I O i(1 - VI tn> aF- a~ x I Z ° J X ~ Z U Z U Z m ~ ~ ~ w z wm w~ p J H J r Q rQ w3m w\ r U r n U Q Q Q Z Z Z Z Q O O W (r YZ-- Z Z N W I Z N N I ? ~ o o i~ ° ° ° o wv v^ 3 wo w° w-I ~_~ cnw vlw ON wm Or Or Z Z w w ln~ O x v~r OW Z ¢ ¢ z z SX z z i ~r ~ ~ r M a 0- a z o~ o~ ® O J W K O ~ O a W U oor ~ Q Q .. 0_ omx ~ Q U _ - wv ~~ ~ m Z Q Z I ~ ¢ J W U - - - - - __ __rwowa~ ag-- - -~-- aW-g- - aUx - Q3 Q o~n - °_ _ - - -- '-- - - N) VI J X N W ao- ar w_ oz ow r;* ~g Q - JU Jl~.~? J\ W Q F a ~ ~ W ~ Z O ~ 0 I w w I w Z O Z O Z N to U Z Z Z Z 00 ~° D° m y ~,~ ~,~ ~W J ° ~° _ O a! O O O o~ o~ om= 7 w m~ ~ h V >! / I I , u Hw / ~~ w I I tna W / / ~ Q U O `_1i _ _ _ _ / Z _ - Z O J 41 J (7 F 7 / _ ~i i ~ - Z C a w z ~ ~ o o in _ - a J J J--. ao zti - U ~ W -I ~ -I N oa ~n -- -._ ~ flll~ ...E .~; . Q Q Q ~ Q J N ~ W U W~ I i O O l0 ~ ----_ ~ n O r M d Z W ~ = _ -' -__- .._ Q O J W J r W U W - tl Z m _ - Y U (n Z f ~ a O Q r 1 ,___ f /I 0 J v0 ~O --.-.0 ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~~Z Z X Q % Q W~ ~ 1' 2~ W W O a o o = 1 z ~ ° m M = 9 = 0 ° ° O = d ~ X ~ X rn ~ ~ Q = w3m Jmr=-O ~ ~ Fr-- ~ w N <U sf C7 N W a. tr U ... -- \ r U X} Z W lr - UN U X Z X W ° J? J? W r ° - Z Z r W Z Y Z W F~ I r 7 r 7 0 VI 2 ~ _ ___ ° (O/1 X °~ U Q W ~ z0 W U W U > ~ ZZ zzr ~ N z W - - - ~ _ , - ` _ _._ --__ _-______ fn Q W O~x d U (/1 ~ r J O Q>' d t r~ r ° _ _ w v~oa NJoa U __ o a~f ao~? a o o~ or o~ or w ~ ~ KZ (r JZ KJZ ~ `.-- U a- aWO awo Q -.. O w to Z Z Z F Q Q W Z O J ~1 J ~ ~t O ~ :t O W J ° O Z Q U Q Q Q Q x tr U x tl' U aM lJi o o io =e =e = w ~ O W -I I O ~ I~ - a O ~ O 2a oa FW-M X IN X IN ~~ a z ~w w w iv vU o aoN w ¢ I t i ° J r W X W W XJ ° O XJp wg zo WU zz . wUY zzr ~ r w¢ N~ o"' fnp ow I p tl o fn p- o U w ~o o~ r J o~ r J ^ ~Z a_ ~ Z aWO K Z aWo .W .. i • • CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA DATE: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 - 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Council Chambers/Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting ROLL CALL: Commissioners Manny Cappello, Jill Hunter, Robert Kundtz, Linda Rodgers, and Chair Susie Nagpal PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ELECTION OF NEW CHAIR MINUTES: Draft Minutes from Regular Planning Commission Meeting of March 22, 2006 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS -Any member of the Public will be allowed to address- the Planning Commission for up to three minutes on matters not on this agenda. The law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Planning Commission may insfruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Planning Commission direction to Staff. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS- PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTION TO STAFF REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on April 12, 2006. REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS If you wish to appeal any decision on this Agenda, you may file an "Appeal Application" with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15-90.050 (b). CONSENT CALENDAR - None PUBLIC HEARINGS All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. Applicants/Appellants and their representatives have a total of ten minutes maximum for opening statements. Members of the Public may comment on any item -for up to three minutes. ApplicantlAppellants and their representatives have a total of five minutes maximum for closing statements. 1. APPLICATION # 06-145 (386-57-022) Pro Signs, Inc., 12220-12228 Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd.; - The applicant requests Design Review Approval to construct a freestanding identification sign. The total area of the sign is approximately 30 square feet and the height is 7 feet 3 inches. The net lot size is approximately 30,000 square feet and the site is zoned C-V. (Suzanne Thomas) • 2. APPLICATION #03-254 (397-03-004) HO, 14289 Sobey Road; -The applicant requests Design Review Approval to construct a new 5,298 sq. ft. two-story residence with a basement, an attached garage, and detached carport on a vacant lot. The maximum height of the proposed residence will not be higher than 26-feet. The gross lot size is 47,045 sq. ft. and the site is zoned R-1-40,000. (Therese Schmidt) 3. APPLICATION #04-068 (503-27-074) Malladi, 14345 Springer Avenue; -The applicant requests Design Review Approval to demolition a 1,169 sq. ft. one-story residence and construct a 3,349 sq. ft. two-story residence with a basement and an attached garage. The maximum height of the proposed residence will not be higher than 25-feet. The gross lot size is 10,265 sq. ft. and the site is zoned R-1, 10,000. (Therese Schmidt) DIRECTORS ITEM - Quarterly study session for training and code discussion. COMMISSION ITEMS - None COMMUNICATIONS - None ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING - Wednesday, April 26, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers/Civic Theater 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (408) 868-1269 or ctclerk@saratoga.ca.us. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II). Certificate of Posting of Agenda:, I, Abby Ayende, Office Specialist for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga was posted on April 6, 2006 at the office of the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 and was available for public review at that location. The-agenda is also available on the City's website at www.sarato age ca.us If you would like to receive the Agenda's via a-mail, please send your a-mail address to planning(a,saratoga.ca.us • • MINUTES SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 PLACE: Council Chambers/Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting Chair Nagpal called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Cappello, Hunter, Kundtz, Nagpal, Rodgers and Schallop Absent: Commissioner Uhl Staff: Director John Livingstone, Associate Planner Lata Vasudevan, Associate Planner Therese Schmidt, Assistant Planner Suzanne. Thomas and Assistant City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES -Regular Meeting of February 22, 2006. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Cappello, seconded by Commissioner Kundtz, the Planning Commission minutes of the regular meeting of February 22, 2006, were adopted with a correction to pages 4,5,6,8,1.4,15, and 16. (6-0-1; Commissioner Uhl was absent) ORAL COMMUNICATION Mr. Paul Fortenot, Saratoga Resident: • Thanked the Commission for the opportunity to speak. • Explained that he spoke to Council about the need for a master plan for wireless facilities. • Said that while this issue will move forward, it will take time. • Assured that he is willing to help out with this. • Said that Saratoga needs to be informed of current and future sites for each service provider. • Added that this does not mean confidential or proprietary information. • Suggested that Nextel, with a pending application. for the Church of the Ascension, be asked to provide this long-term-plan for Saratoga. • Advised that there are third party companies out there compiling such information. • Said that Council could be encouraged to insist that this sort of information be part of the application process. Commissioner Kundtz said that he has probed applicants on two occasions about their long- range strategic plan but was told both times that this information does not exist. He asked Mr. Paul Fortenot if he knows factually that they do indeed have such information. • C7 . Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 3 Mr. Paul Fortenot said that while he cannot state factually that they do have such information, he does believe they can provide such information if asked. Commissioner Kundtz agreed it-would likely be available.- Mr. Paul Fortenot agreed. Chair Nagpal pointed out that the Church of the Ascension is scheduled for a Study Session. Mr. Ray Muzzy, Saratoga Resident: • Reminded that the people who come to the public meetings for the service providers don't actually work for those providers but rather represent third party companies. • Assured that. corporations do have such long-term plans but that this information would -have to be extracted from the providers themselves rather than their third-party representatives. • Stated that if this information is required, they would cough it up but they would not do so unless required to do so. ORAL COMMUNICATION -PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTION TO STAFF Chair Nagpal asked Director John Livingstone if Council has changed its priorities as far as Ordinance updates. Director John Livingstone reported that staff is preparing a report to Council for its meeting of April 5~' that will update them on priorities. Commissioner Cappello asked whether the list of questions developed for cell site applications- could be a part of the package for the pending application from Nextel. Director John Livingstone replied that this is not a requirement but the applicant is encouraged to provide the most information possible. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA Director John Livingstone announced that, pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on March 15, 2006. REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS Chair Nagpal announced that appeals are possible for any decision made on this Agenda by filing an Appeal Application with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15.90.050(b). CONSENT CALENDAR There were no Consent Calendar Items. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 4 *** PUBLIC HEARING -ITEM NO. 1 APPLICATION #06-210 (397-06-092) NARAIN, 18596 Arbolado Way: The applicant requests Design. Review Approval to demolish approximately 38% of the existing exterior walls of a single-story single-family detached residence and construct a major architectural renovation with the addition of a second story and construct a small detached accessory pool structure. The total floor area of the proposed residence will be 5,897 square feet including an attached garage. The proposal includes removal of one Ordinance-sized tree, a 12-inch diameter European White Birch. The maximum height of the proposed residence will not be higher than 24 feet. The net lot size is 40,205 square feet -and the site is zoned R-1-40,000. (Therese Schmidt) Associate Planner Therese Schmidt presented the staff report as follows: • Stated that the applicant is seeking Design Review Approval to demolish approximately 38 percent of the exterior walls of an existing single-story single-family residence and construct a new second story and small pool structure. • Described the architecture being modified from ranch to traditional contemporary. • Reported that this conversion of a single-story into atwo-story is exempt under CEQA and no geotechnical clearance is required. • .Explained that there are 15 protected trees on the property and the Arborist's report recommends the removal of one Birch tree. • Advised that five neighbors submitted comments. One had concerns over the architectural design's compatibility with the neighborhood. • Said that this project is consistent with the General Pal and that Design Review findings can be made in the affirmative. • Recommended approval. Commissioner Rodgers pointed out that instead of story- poles there was simply a single two by four at the top of the roof to indicate the maximum proposed height. She asked whether orange netting had been required. Planner Therese Schmidt replied that the use of orange netting was not required but strongly suggested. Staff simply asked for the single pole. Commissioner Hunter asked why orange netting was not required. Planner Therese Schmidt said that it was simply an oversight on her part as the applicant would have been willing to install this orange netting if asked. Commissioner Hunter said that use of orange netting shows up better and is important on a hillside. Commissioner Kundtz said he agreed that one pole was not enough. He added that more comprehensive poles with netting would be well received by the Planning Commission. . Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 5 Planner Therese Schmidt said that staff would take care in the future. Commissioner Rodgers pointed- out that other residences beyond the noticing distance of 500 feet could be impacted-with hillside construction. Chair Nagpal opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Mr. Adam Rockwood, Project Architect: • Advised that this project was submitted on December 21, 2005. • Said that they are thrilled to bring this project before the Commission. • Advised that this is a 40,205 square foot level lot that will undergo a major remodel with the addition of a second story and cabana for a total square footage of 5,897. • Described the architectural style as being international. • Said that two neighbors had expressed concern over the proposed architectural style. '• Pointed out that there are varied architectural styles in this area including neoclassic, modern, Spanish, colonial revival and others. • .Said that one Ordinance protected tree, with a 12-inch diameter, would be removed and replaced with two Oaks. • Reminded that they have been working with staff for three months. • Said that this project is pure to its architectural style and the requirements of the Planning Department. Commissioner Hunter pointed-out that there is no way that homes along Sobey Road can be aware of the potential impacts of this second story addition. She asked Mr. Adam Rockwood if it had occurred to him to install the orange netting to demonstrate the impacts of this addition. Mr. Adam Rockwood replied no, they simply followed staff direction. Commissioner Rodgers said that she takes a consistent approach on hillside projects and asked Mr. Adam Rockwood if he is opposed to installing netting for a while. Mr. Adam Rockwood: • Replied yes, -they would object at this point in time. • Reminded that the use of orange netting was never required or requested. • Stated that imposing that requirement that now would mean this application would -have to come back to a future meeting. • Reminded that the neighbors were notified as required. • Clarified that this is not a hillside lot. Commissioner Hunter said that this addition would be visible but she can understand the concerns by the applicant about .requesting orange netting to be installed at this point since- this was not a requirement. Chair Nagpal asked-the slope of this lot. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 6 Mr. Adam Rockwood replied seven percent slope. He said that if one looks at the larger homes located across the way, many are painted very obvious colors such as peach while he is proposing natural colors. that match the area better. He assured that this home , would be less visible than -the large white houses located below them.. : Chair Nagpal asked to see the color boards. Commissioner Rogers asked how the flat roof style is designed to handle rain runoff. Mr. Adam Rockwood replied that-the Building Department standards are met and include a minimum slope and gutter system to handle rainwater. Commissioner Cappello asked about the roofing material proposed. Mr. Adam Rockwood said that the roofing material is not yet determined but he assured that it would be non-reflective and not metal. He said that it mighf be asphalt. He concluded by stating his hope that the Commission would approve this application tonight. Chair Nagpal closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Commissioner Hunter: • Agreed that since the use of orange netting was not requested of this applicant, it would be unfair to penalize them for not having it installed. • Suggested that in the future, it would be a good idea to require installation of orange netting on hillside properties. • Said that-this home design is fine and unusual. • Stated her support. Commissioner Rodgers: • Said that whenever a hillside property is involved, she would like to see story poles installed. • Added that she does not have the imagination to see .the potential impacts without a demonstration -using the orange netting. • Said that some neighbors have objected to this home's international modern architecture. • .Said that it is somewhat hard to see how it will look in three dimensions especially the older portion. Commissioner Kundtz said that there is a home similarly designed located near him and that this is a great and unique design. Commissioner Cappello: • Agreed -that story poles are very beneficial to help give perspective but that the City does not currently have that as a requirement but rather just as a request of applicants. • Reminded that the applicant met the request made to install the single pole and cannot be penalized for not going beyond that. .Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 7 • Said that until the use of story poles becomes an Ordinance requirement, the Commission is in a tough position. • Stated that h_e likes this home's design. ,. • Agreed that there is a mixture of architectural design in this and other areas of Saratoga. Commissioner Hunter cautioned that if staff suggests to an applicant that story poles are a good idea, the applicant should do it. She added that the Commission could ask for story poles. Commissioner Rodgers agreed .that the Commission could ask if it believes it to be necessary. She asked that the Community Development Director implement the wishes of the Commission on this issue. Commissioner Cappello said that he could understand why the single pole was requested by staff to define the maximum height on this flat design. .Commissioner Rodgers said that one two-by-four would not tell the extent of the height of the roof to her. . Commissioner Cappello said that he has no problem imagining the impact to views with one pole. Chair Na al: 9P • Said that this is a mixed neighborhood and this home has a beautiful modern, international design..- . Pointed out a nearby contemporary home that is located next to a Spanish style home. • -Said that this home would be an asset. • .Expressed her support. • Added that the proposed colors made a difference for her as they are very much in keeping with the general surroundings. • Stated that she is able to make the required findings in the affirmative. Motion:- Upon motion of Commissioner Hunter, seconded by Commissioner Cappello, the Planning Commission adopted a Resolution granting Design Review Approval (Application #06-210) to allow a renovation and second story addition and a-new accessory pool structure at an existing residence located at 18596 Arbolado Way, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Cappello, Hunter, Kundtz, Nagpal, Rodgers and Schallop NOES: None ABSENT: Uhl . ABSTAIN: None *** PUBLIC HEARING -ITEM N0.2 Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 8 APPLICATION #06-270 (503-27-650) GUO/MA, 14360 Paul Avenue: The applicant requests a modification to a Design Review Approval granted by the Planning Commission at their January 11, 2006, hearing,. which consisted of demolition of an existing one-story single- family residence and construction of a two-story single-family residence with a total floor area of 2,400 square feet. A 966 square foot basement was also approved: The maximum height of the approved residence is 25 feet, 6 inches. The proposed modification would increase. the total floor area to 5,558 square feet and decrease the maximum height of the residence to 24 feet, 8 inches. The gross lot size is 5,162 square feet and the site is zoned R-1-10,000. (Therese Schmidt) Planner Therese Schmidt presented the staff report as follows: • Advised that the applicant is seeking approval of a Modification to a Design Review Approval that was granted by the Planning Commission at its meeting of January 11, 2006.- • Reminded that the original approval was to demolish asingle-story single-family residence and construct atwo-story single-family residence with an attached two-car garage, a 966 square foot basement and with a maximum height of 25 feet, 6 inches. • Explained that the Modification includes a decrease in maximum .height to 24 feet, 8 inches, changing of windows- and a 158 square foot addition to the second story at the north elevation of the house: • Reported that any changes to an approval made by the Planning Commission are brought back to the Commission for consideration. • Said that this project is Categorically Exempt under CEQA and no geotechnical or arborist reports are required. • Stated that four neighbors submitted comments. One has concern about the change in window location. Another neighbor called this evening and said he plans to attend tonight. • Said that the project is consistent with the General Plan and meets Design Review findings. • Recommended approval with two changes to the draft Resolution. One is to correct the date on Condition No. 1 from December 22, 2005,. to March 3, 2006. Another is the addition of Condition No. 14 that requires the redesign of the chimney to extend beyond the roofline to the approval of the Community Development Director. Commissioner Hunter asked for clarification that the proposed window changes are for two windows and include what was once a simple window as now a bow window in the master bedroom. Planner Therese Schmidt replied yes. She added that what was once a single window is now proposed to be changed into two windows. Commissioner Hunter asked if a bow window is bigger than a regular window. Planner Therese Schmidt replied yes. Chair Nagpal asked how high this window would be placed. Planner. Therese Schmidt answered five feet, five inches above the floor. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 9 Commissioner Cappello asked if the decrease in maximum height is a design change. Planner Therese Schmidt replied yes. Commissioner Rodgers asked if raising the chimney above the roofline would have an impact on the neighbor. Planner Therese Schmidt said that it would have no view impact and would look better. Commissioner Rodgers added that it would also work better for awood-burning fireplace. Planner Therese Schmidt advised that she believed this fireplace is gas. Chair Nagpal opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 2. Ms. Rachel Frame, Project Designer: • -Said that she is representing Mr. and Mrs. Ma. • -Said that windows appear to be the primary concern especially the proposed bow window. The neighbor with concerns is here tonight. • .Reported that the Mas have reached an .agreement with Mr. Schneider and the original placement of the -bow widow would be kept where it was at the back of the house but wider. It will be centered more and extended in width and Mr. Schneider has agreed. • Added that a window has been added to the right elevation, at the right side of the back of the house serving bedroom #2. Commissioner Rodgers-asked if the bay window to the-back of the house is still in the new proposed location. Ms. Rachel Frame reported that they had met with Mr. Schneider just before tonight's meeting and reached a compromise. The Mas have agreed to reduce the height and bow and move it back to the original location with slightly larger width. Commissioner Cappello asked if the bow window on the right side would be removed and replaced with an equivalent window as is used on the left side. Ms. Rachel Frame replied correct. She added that Dr. Weinmann had an issue with the height and location of that window. He does not like the added width proposed. She reported that they had aline-of-site study prepared. Commissioner Cappello clarified that the previous placement at five feet, five inches has been replaced with a bow window at a five-foot height that is wider. Ms. Rachel Frame: • Replied correct. • .Reported that-the bow window is back in its original location. • Explained that she had an error in FAR (floor area ratio) calculations that allowed them to add approximately 150 square feet to the second .level that allows an additional bath and a Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 10 wider master bedroom that was originally 11 feet and is now 14 feet wide. Additionally, the fourth bedroom didn't have a closet and one has been added with the addition of two feet to the north left side of the house. _ • Said that the house is -still set back five feet further than required due to an easement. • Stated that the roof was brought down to help mitigate the appearance of bulk. • Assured that the new elevations are much more attractive and in proportion. Dr. Bob Weinmann, Saratoga Resident: • Said that he is concerned about line-of-site impacts with a larger window and its potential for invasion of privacy in his yard. • Said that the larger window offers more viewing space. • Stated that as long as the line-of-site is not changed from previously approved, his concern is mitigated. If not, he stands to sacrifice privacy for the use of his pool and yard area, which causes a concern of the quality of use of his yard and pool. • Added that this is not an unreasonable concern. • Pointed out that another window in the other direction will already offer light to this room. • Said in the issue of privacy versus need for light, he would be the largest loser. Commissioner Rodgers asked how Dr. Weinmann would feel about adding a Condition requiring the planting of trees. Dr. Weinmann asked what side of the property. Commissioner Rodgers asked Dr. Weinmann his preference. Dr. Weinmann said his preference would be on his side Commissioner Hunter asked Dr. Weinmann if he is willing to allow the planting of trees on his property. Dr. Weinmann said he would be willing but that he is not sure if this -would be an adequate solution. He added that he has to defer to the expertise of the project designer. Mr. Scott Schneider, Saratoga Resident: • Explained that he is the neighbor who called earlier this evening. • Said that he and the Mas have reached a good compromise and that he was glad to have been able to work something out with the Mas that is good for both sides. Commissioner Hunter asked Mr. Schneider where his home is located. Mr. Scott Schneider replied next to Dr. Weinmann's. • Ms. Rachel Frame: • Said that the only issue left is the window and Dr. Weinmann's concerns about it. • Said that it is up to the Planning Commission to determine if widening this window represents an added invasion of his privacy. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 11 • Stated that there is no change in line-of-sight.- They are only widening the window not changing the height. • Deferred this decision to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Hunter asked if this would be a child's room. Ms. Rachel Frame replied that it is for a second child that is not yet on the way. Commissioner Cappello said that this room shares windows on the front of the home: Ms. Rachel Frame replied correct. She said that there is a lot of window in-that room but that it is a small room and windows open small spaces up. Commissioner Cappello asked if there is also a window on the other side of the house serving this particular bedroom. Ms. Rachel Frame replied no. Commissioner Hunter asked Ms. Rachel Frame for her comments on the installation of trees. Ms. Rachel Frame said this risks compromising the- view of the hills by the Mas. She said that they would prefer a compromise in the size of window if necessary. • Commissioner- Hunter pointed out that Dr. Weinmann could plant trees on his property any. way. Ms. Rachel Frame agreed. Chair Nagpal closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 2. Commissioner Kundtz: • Said that the Mas did a nice job with the redesign. • Stated that it is nice for them to find an extra 150 square feet. • Said that there is a lot of emphasis on unreasonable invasions of privacy. • Said that there is not an unreasonable compromise of privacy on Dr. Weinmann as privacy impacts are not expanded with a horizontal expansion of this window. • Advised that he supports the project as proposed. • Reminded that, if necessary, Dr. Weinmann can plant trees on his property. Commissioner Rodgers: • Suggested that the applicants be asked to provide a tree to Dr. Weinmann that only grows to a certain height. • Said that she does not object to the window as proposed. • Proposed that Dr.` Weinmann be allowed to see the window view once installed to S determine if a screening tree is even necessary to preserve his privacy in the yard. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 12 Chair Nagpal asked if Commissioner Rodgers is suggested that as a Condition of Approval. Commissioner Rodgers replied yes. Commissioner Cappello: • Agreed that the impact is not unreasonable. • Said he has no problem supporting this project as is. • Expressed appreciation for the applicant's mitigation of impacts as much as possible by relocating the bow window. • Stated his support. Commissioner Hunter: • Pointed out that Dr. Weinmann's home is a single-story. • -Said that getting a new two-story next to an existing single-story is a shock but that accommodations have been made. • -Said that she will support this request and that she hopes the neighbors work together. • Suggested that Dr. Weinmann has a triangle of land available where he can put in trees if necessary for privacy. Chair Nagpal: • Explained that the line of sight drawings show that there are no unreasonable impacts with this window. • Expressed agreement with the comments of the other Commissioners. • Said that she does not agree with the suggested added Condition of Approval requiring Dr. Weinmann to see the window in place to decide if a tree is necessary. Commissioner Rodgers said that she is willing to support this project even without that condition. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Cappello, seconded by Commissioner Rodgers, the Planning Commission adopted a Resolution granting a Modification (Application #06-270) to a previously approved Design Review Approval (Application No. 06-075) changing out windows, increasing the total square footage and decreasing the maximum height, on property located at 14360 Paul Avenue, as modified, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Cappello, Hunter, Kundtz, Nagpal, Rodgers and Schallop NOES: None ABSENT: Uhl ABSTAIN: None *** PUBLIC HEARING -ITEM NO. 3 APPLICATION #06-173 (410-39-016) LLOYD, 15310 Quito Road: The applicant requests Design Review Approval to construct a 920 square foot one-story addition to an existing two- Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 13 .story single-family residence. The total floor area of the residence, including the proposed addition, is 6,537 square feet. The maximum height of the addition is 18 feet. The net lot size is 42,207 square feet and the site is zoned R-1-40,000. (Suzanne Thomas) _ _ _ _... - Assistant Planner Suzanne Thomas presented the staff report as follows: • Advised -that the. applicant is seeking Design Review Approval to add asingle-story addition to an existing two-story residence of approximately 900 square feet for a total square footage over 6,000 square feet. • Explained that Planning Commission approval is required whenever the total. square footage of a residence exceeds 6,000 square feet. • Added that the maximum height proposed is 18 feet and the lot size is 42,000 square in an R-1-40,000 zoning district. • Reported that building materials would match existing including natural stone, plaster and a the room. • Distributed a photograph of the home and the color rendering. • Stated that three trees are potentially impacted. One, a Walnut, has received support for removal by the Arborist due to its poor condition. • Reminded that there is a riparian zone by the creek on this property. Therefore there are two setbacks. The required creek setback to the riparian setback and the standard rear lot . setback from the house. • Said that a modification of the Conditions of Approval would allow encroachment into the setback if a biologist says that it can be allowed. This would consist of approximately four . square feet in area with ample mitigations proposed and conditioned. • Explained that since this project is 150 feet away from the creek, there is no requirement for a permit from the Santa Clara Valley. Water District, which requires permits for work performed within 50 feet of a creek. Commissioner Rodgers asked about the fence in place nearby. Planner. Suzanne Thomas: • -Said that the applicant could respond about the fence. • Reported that the plans were provided to the neighbors and notification occurred to property owners within 500 feet. No negative comments were received. • -Said that the site is set back and located below Quito Road. There are no views or privacy impacts. • Said that one tree will be removed. • Reported that the Biologist has reviewed impacts and finds this project will enhance the area. • Recommended approval, saying that the required findings can be made in the affirmative. Commissioner Kundtz extended his compliments to Planner Suzanne Thomas on her report. He pointed out that the check off boxes on the neighbor notification forms are not included. He pointed out that he had mentioned this oversight before and asked staff to look at this more carefully in the future. Planner Suzanne Thomas said this is an excellent point and staff will watch for it in the future. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 14 Commissioner Rod ers sou ht clarification on the area to be encroached. 9 9 Planner Suzanne Thomas explained that it is not-the riparian corridor that is to be encroached but the buffer zone. Commissioner Rodgers pointed out a drain grate that appears to be on the footprint of the home. Planner Suzanne Thomas deferred this issue to the applicant. Chair Nagpal opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 3. Mr. Derek Van Alstine, Project Architect: • Explained that with the original subdivision the Water District required the fence mentioned by Commissioner Rodgers. Commissioner Rodgers said that although there was no .footprint indicated on the ground she had a question about the existing grate that appears to be in the proposed footprint. Mr. Derek Van Alstine said it was in the footprint area and would be moved eight to ten feet toward the creek. Chair Na al asked if this is a storm drain. 9p Mr. Derek Van Alstine replied that it is an area drain for the yard. Commissioner Rodgers asked if it handles runoff. Mr. Derek Van Alstine said that if there is heavy rain perhaps but not a significant amount. Commissioner Rodgers asked about the use of wood burning fireplaces particularly with the close proximity of only 30 feet to the house on Lot C. Mr. Derek Van Alstine replied that the two proposed fireplaces are gas. Commissioner Rodgers pointed out that Code allows one wood burning and the Conditions list one wood burning and one gas. She asked Mr. Derek Van Alstine if he has any problem changing the Condition to reflect two gas-burning fireplaces. Mr. Derek Van Alstine replied no. Commissioner Rodgers asked about plans for a pool. Mr. Derek Van Alstine replied that-this would be dealt with later as a separate application. ~~ Commissioner Rodgers asked staff if a pool was not already approved. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 15 Planner Suzanne Thomas replied no. The request for a pool has not-yet been submitted. Commissioner Rodgers-asked if a pool application comes fo the Commission: Mr. Derek Van Alstine: • Replied that the concept of a pool was brought to the Commission as part of the mitigation factor as part of the landscape plan. • Stated that it is anticipated that a pool will be built but it is an over-the-counter application to be handled later and not as part of this application. • Thanked the Commission for its time. • Asked for approval of this application this evening. Chair Nagpal closed the Public Hearing for Agenda .Item No. 3. Commissioner Hunter said she thought this project is fine. Commissioner Cappello agreed. Assistant City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer pointed out a typographical correction on the . resolution where the work "it" should be replaced with "is." Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Hunter, seconded by Commissioner Kundtz, the Planning Commission adopted a Resolution granting Design Review Approval (Application No. 06-173) to construct a single story addition to an existing two-story single-family residence on property located at 15310 Quito Road, with the modification to Condition #3A allowing only gas fireplaces, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Cappello, Hunter, Kundtz, Nagpal, Rodgers and Schallop NOES: None ABSENT: Uhl ABSTAIN: None *** PUBLIC HEARING -ITEM N0.4 APPLICATION #06-156 (397-10-033) HARINARAYAN, 15126 Via Colinas The applicant requests Design Review Approval to construct a new two-story single-family home. with a basement on a vacant 44,478 (net) square foot lot. The total floor area of the proposed residence will be 6,029 square feet including an attached garage, with a 2,410 square foot basement. The proposal includes removal of one Ordinance-sized tree, a 25-inch diameter Deodar Cedar. The maximum height of the proposed residence will be 26 feet. The site is zoned R-1-40,000. (Lata Vasdevan) Associate Planner Lata Vasudevan presented the staff report as follows: Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 16 • Advised that the applicant is seeking Design Review Approval to allow a new multi-story 6,029 square foot residence with a 2,410 square foot basement and a maximum height of 26 feet. • Described -the architectural-style as Spanish Mediterranean that is .compatible with the neighborhood. The home uses varying rooflines and articulation reduces and minimizes the appearance of mass. The home will compliment the neighborhood. • Stated that materials include brown barrel-clay the roof, beige stucco and iron railings. • Explained that there are five trees on or near the property with potential for impacts. One, a Cedar, has been determined by the Arborist to be suitable for removal because of poor condition. • Stated that the conditions proposed by the October 2005 Arborist Report have been added. • Reported that no negative comments were received by the neighbors who reviewed the project. • Explained that the applicant made efforts to contact neighbors and will report on those efforts. • Said that Design Review findings can be made in the affirmative. • Recommended approval. • Pointed out a correct to Attachment #3 of the staff report where the mailing notice labels were included from the wrong project in the staff report. A correct distribution list was provided to the Commissioners. Commissioner Rodgers said that the proposed stucco color appears yellow rather than earth tone. Planner Lata Vasudevan said that there is no specific definition of earth tones but includes beige, yellow and sandstone. Commissioner Hunter said that in her experience she has never seen an application for which no neighbor acknowledgement forms were received. She said that the applicant should explain the notification attempts. Chair Nagpal opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 4. Mr. Noel Cross, Project Architect: • Said that his clients attempted several times to reach neighbors. No one was home when contact was attempted. His clients dropped off notes. Since that time, his clients have spoken with four neighbors. No negative comments were received. One made comment on the size but was satisfied to learn of the retention of the Cedar. tree. The neighbors across the street had promised to send -the form in to the City. Commissioner Hunter reiterated that she is amazed not to see any returned forms. Mr. Noel Cross assured that the attempt was made to secure these forms. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 17 Commissioner Hunter said that the Commission likes to see these signed forms especially since this is such an enormous home. Mr. -Noel Cross-reiterated that attempts-were made. Commissioner Rodgers asked about the paint color proposed. Mr. Noel Cross said that the use of a color copier brightened the appearance of the proposed color on the sample board. He added that he -would consider earthening the paint color down to a -more brown and muted color. Commissioner Hunter asked what happens to the bags on the tree roots after the concrete is poured. Mr. Paul Conrado, Project Builder, advised that the bags are removed and the area back filled with dirt. Ms. Sudha Neelakantan, Property Owner & Applicant: • Reported on her attempts to secure neighbor input on her proposal. • Said that one couple said they would show the plans to their architect and contact her if there are any problems with the proposal. • Added that another neighbor thought the house was large but had no impact on him so he promised to send in the form. • Stated that she spoke with the neighbor across the street, offered the plans and expected comments. • .Concluded by saying she is not sure why none of the forms were returned. Commissioner Hunter said she has never seen a case with no returned forms. Ms. Sudha Neelakantan said that she tried. She said that the neighbor across the street was supportive and promised to submit the form. She added that the O'Connells were not interested as they only live in the neighborhood for part of the year.. Commissioner Hunter said that the paint color seems bright. Ms. Sudha Neelakantan said she would defer to her architect on that issue. Mr. Noel Cross: • Said that the color appears brighter because it is a color copy. • Assured that the original samples are more muted. • Added that they are willing to change color. • Stated that he had impressed on his clients -the importance of neighbor contact and they did their best. The neighbors were not interested. Commissioner Hunter said that the applicant usually takes the form and has the neighbor sign it and takes it back right away. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 18 Ms. Sudha Neelakantan said that this request for signature was refused. Mr. Noel Cross reiterated that every attempt was made to get the forms signed. Chair Nagpal closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 4. Commissioner Cappello: • Stated that if neighbors had issues, the Commission would hear about -them. If not, they don't seem to care. • Advised that he likes the design. It is a beautiful home that fits nicely. • Suggested that the findings to support can be reached easily. • Said that the color is bright and can be muted down working with staff. Commissioner Schallop agreed. Commissioner Rodgers asked staff if they need any more instruction on color. Director John Livingstone replied no, staff could work with the applicant on color. Commissioner Hunter: • Explained that the Commission has to study a project before a hearing. Each reads the packet thoroughly including reading neighbor comments. • Said that she hopes in future it does not happen again that no neighbor input is provided. • Reiterated that in her five years as a Commissioner she- has never seen a project where no neighbor forms were provided. • Stressed that the Commission is here to represent the community and it needs to do a good job. Chair Nagpal asked Commissioner Hunter if she supports this project. Commissioner Hunter replied yes, with reservations. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Cappello, seconded by Chair Nagpal, the Planning Commission adopted a Resolution granting Design Review Approval (Application #06-156) to allow the- construction of a new two- story single-family residence on a vacant lot on property located at 15126 Via Colina, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Cappello, Hunter, Kundtz, Nagpal, Rodgers and Schallop NOES: None ABSENT: Uhl ABSTAIN: None DIRECTOR'S ITEMS *** • t Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 19 There were no Director's Items. COMMISSION ITEMS Commissioner Kundtz asked for additional staff input on the issue of story poles, orange netting and public notification.- Director John Livingstone said that there are noticing limits and currently no requirement for story poles. The feedback from the Commission is that it wants more story poles to provide a visual reference to help determine impacts particularly for hillside properties where impacts might be generated across a valley. He said that staff can request story poles but the applicant can also refuse. Story poles can be costly to install. Chair Nagpal pointed out that if members of the public notice story poles, they can contact the City for information .about what is proposed.- Assistant City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer asked if there is a difference between story pole and orange webbing. Commissioner Rodgers said that she is speaking of orange webbing. Director John Livingstone said that typically story poles include orange webbing to show the ridgeline. Chair Nagpal cautioned that the Commission is not asking for story poles for all projects. Commissioner Rodgers said that hillside lots are a major concern. Commissioner Hunter agreed that small lots and hillside properties are very important for use of story poles to determine impacts. Commissioner Cappello agreed and suggested further guidance for staff since the significant cost is of concem. He added that the cost of story poles does not help the design and building. While story poles are not to be required in every case, they are appropriate in some. Chair Nagpal agreed that they are not necessary in all cases but it is important for staff to -let an applicant know if they believe story poles are necessary. Commissioner Rodgers said that large homes on a hill and small substandard lots where houses are so close could benefit from story poles. to allow a visual depiction of impacts. Commissioner Hunter asked staff if there have been appeals of recent Commission actions to Council. Director John Livingstone re~orted that the Subway denial has been appealed and will be heard by Council at its April 5 meeting. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for March 22, 2006 Page 20 Chair Nagpal announced that she would be present at the April 5~' .Council meeting to represent the Planning Commission's majority vote. Commissioner Rodgers asked how opposing views from the- Planning Commission could be presented to Council. Commissioner Hunter replied that the Chair presents the chief Planning Commission votes but any Commissioner can speak as an individual. Director John Livingstone reminded that Council could redirect appeals back to the Commission. If any Commissioner speaks as a citizen at the Council hearing that could taint their involvement if Council returns the project to the Commission for further consideration. Assistant City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer said that if a Commissioner speaks at a Council meeting as a private individual, there might be a bias claim by the applicant stating that this particular Commissioner should not consider the project again. Commissioner Rodgers asked if she simply reports the comments of the Commission is there still the potential for a bias issue. Assistant City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer replied yes. Chair Nagpal pointed out that the Council would have the minutes from the Planning Commission meeting. Assistant City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer stated that this is why the review of the minutes from that meeting was so important. COMMUNICATIONS There were no Communications Items. ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING Upon motion of Commissioner Hunter, seconded by Commissioner Kundtz, Chair Nagpal adjourned the meeting at 9:08 p.m. to the next Regular Planning Commission meeting of April 12, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. MINUTES PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY: Corinne A. Shinn, Minutes Clerk Item 1 CJ REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No./Location: ApplicantlOwner: Staff Planner: Type of Application: Date: APN: Department Head: App # 06-145/ 12220-12228 Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road Pro Signs, Inc. Suzanne Thomas, Assistant Planners Multi-Tenant Identification Sign Apri112, 2006 386-57-022 John F. Livingstone, AICP ~~Z. 'tip' ~~a9 ~ .i ; r IrI ~ I ' L7 r I~ =~ ~~Y _f~al I ~• .. r w• yi Pi.~~ ':I~ j r ~ ti I KIKKMONT ^KIRK,HO I ~• ~ Ig :. - _ --- t Il x~... ---._ _ '~._. s= u ,. --' . ~-- Y ~a~.L -. ,: ---- 1~ • Fain 3 ~ __ __~__-____~_ .: Aa ____ _- _ ...,..~ .~.` • ~~ Q K.~rrr. _ •~'O;a ~ d O y KNOLLMr _ •~ ~ ~nir~ ;:gym .. -~.. __:~_~ R o r _~.. _ ~ tr ~ .. ~ L V :~a20.123~F ---Zoli) --- -_ ___ - - U i ~ rmp. bV Rd R ~~m~ ~ I -- --5(~QAL--^- ' soo• Raewr 12220-12228 Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road Application No. 06-145,• 12220-12228 Saratoga-SUnnyvaleRoad EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY: Application filed: 10/13/05 Application complete: 03/21/06 Notice published: 03/29/06 Mailing completed: 03/24/06 Posting completed: 03/21/06 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests approval for a sign permit to construct a freestanding multi-tenant identification sign. The proposed sign will consist of an internally illuminated bronze- colored cabinet with white lettering against a dark surface, which will be framed in redwood and situated in a stone base. The sign is approximately 35 square feet in area and 7.5 feet in height. It will be located on the southeast corner of Kirkmont Drive and Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road in the C-V zone. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve this application for sign permit with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. • • • Application No. 06-145,• 12220-12228 Saratoga-SunnyvaleRoad STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: C-V (Commercial Visitor) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: PDM (Planned Development) MEASURE G: -Not applicable PARCEL SIZE: Approximately 30,000 square feet ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed new sign is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (e) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption. allows for the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures, including accessory (appurtenant). structures. MATERIALS AND COLORS: The applicant is .proposing an internally illuminated bronze- colored aluminum cabinet with white lettering against a dark acrylic surface. The sign will be framed in redwood to match the adjacent building and will be mounted in a stone base. • PROJECT DATA PROPOSAL CODE REQUIREMENTS/MAX SIZE SIZE OF LETTERING: Not to exceed 5 inches 18 inches AREA OF SIGN: Approx. 35 square feet 40 square feet -for a free standing identification sign for a site containing five or more separate uses in a commercial district HEIGHT OF SIGN: LENGTH OF STRUCTURE: • Stone Base: Redwood Sign Frame Approx.. 7.5 feet Not to exceed 8 feet Not to exceed 7 feet 10 feet (outside of 50-foot triangle of visibility) 3. Application No. 06-145,• 1222012228 Saratoga-SunnyvaleRoad • PROJECT DISCUSSION: The applicant is requesting sign permit approval to construct a new freestanding multi- tenant identification sign to replace an existing single-tenant identification sign (Attachment 3). The project site is located on the southeast corner of Kirkmont Drive and Saratoga- Sunnyvale Road in the C-V zone. All applications for permits to construct multi-tenant signs shall be acted upon by the Planning Commission. The proposed freestanding sign will consist of abronze=colored illuminated cabinet, which will be framed by a curved redwood header and redwood posts. Stone will- surround. the base of the framed sign. The face of the sign will consist ofdark-colored acrylic panels with white lettering identifying the businesses and will be identical on both sides of the sign. The dimensions of the sign are approximately 35 square feet in area, 10 inches in depth, and 7.5 feet in height, well below the ten-foot height allowed for freestanding signs. The lettering will not exceed 5 inches in height. Because the sign is located near an intersection, it has been set back from the corner, placing it outside of the triangle of visibility (Attachment 4). The sign will be illuminated with internal fluorescent lighting from dusk until 10:00 p.m. The City shall reserve continuing jurisdiction over any permit for an illuminated sign and may revoke the same upon any failure by the permittee to comply with any condition set forth therein: Landscaping The landscaping will continue to be maintained on a weekly basis by the current landscape service. Once the sign is in place, additional landscaping will be added, which will be similar to that already in place but low enough to avoid obstructing the- sign. Modifications to Plans The applicant has made numerous modifications to the plans, while working with Staff to comply with the Gateway Design Guidelines. The proposed sign has evolved from a metallic exterior with a concrete base and a white illuminated face to the current project, which is framed in redwood, surrounded by a stone base, and uses a dark surface with white lettering to soften the visual luminous impact. Neighbor Review Letters All neighbors within 500 feet of the parcel were notified about the project and the applicant submitted notification forms from several neighbors. Staff has received no negative responses to the project, although one neighbor was concerned about the lack of consistency in existing Gateway signage (Attachment 5). • Application No. 06-I45,• 1222012228 Saratoga-SrannyvaleRoad Design Review Findings The proposed project is consistent with Article 15-30 of the City Code. (a) The sign complies with the regulations of Article 15=30 and of the commercial district. The sign is located on the same site as the uses that it identifies. Because the site contains five separate uses and is in the commercial district, a freestanding identification sign is allowed. (b) The size, shape, color, illumination, placement and material of the sign are compatible with the building it identifies .and the visual characteristics of the neighborhood and other lawful signs in the area. The sign is compliant with the height and area restrictions for a freestanding sign in a commercial district. The dark colors, stone, and redwood framing are compatible with the building it identifies and with the neighborhood. The source of illumination is internal fluorescent lighting, thereby preventing direct visibility of the primary source of light. (c) The location and design of the sign does-not obscure from view or unduly detract from- existing adjacent signs. The sign is set back from the corner and is located outside of the 50-foot triangle of visibility. It does not detract from existing signs on adjacent properties. (d) The location and design of a sign in close proximity to any residential district will not adversely affect the quality or character of such residential area. The site is surrounded by commercial properties. Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road Gateway Design Guidelines The proposed project is consistent with all of the following Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road Gateway Design Guidelines, which were adopted by the Saratoga City Council on November 19, 2003. (a) Signage should be visible but fit appropriately with building architecture. The natural materials and the dark colors used to accent the sign are designed to be consistent with the building and with the architectural guidelines for the Gateway District. (b) Sign materials should be complimentary and consistent with architectural materials. The redwood and stone sign materials are complimentary and consistent with the redwood trim and brick used on the adjacent building. (c) Monument signs are to be placed so that they are visible to passing motorists. The .height of the sign will inform pedestrians and passersby of the variety of businesses available onsite. Application No. 06-145,• 1222012228 Saratoga-SUnnyvaleRoad (d) Commercial signs for the identification ofmulti-tenant projects or buildings should be ground mounted, internally or ground-lighted with a masonry base that is integrated with site landscaping. The sign will be internally lighted with a masonry base that is integrated with the existing and proposed landscaping. Conclusion Staff finds that all the Design Review Approval findings can be made in the affirmative and that the proposed sign is compatible with the existing character of the neighborhood. The sign conforms to all of the standards and requirements of Article 15-30 of the City Code and is consistent with the Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road Gateway Design Guidelines. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the application for Sign permit with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. ATTAC~~VIENTS: 1. Resolution of Approval with conditions. 2. Affidavit of Mailing Notices, Public Hearing Notice, Mailing labels for project notification. 3. Photo of existing sign. 4. Location of sign outside 50-foot triangle of visibility. 5. Letters from neighbors. 6. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A." CD r~ i~ • Attachment l • t ~.i APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. Application No. 06-145 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Pro Sign, Inc.; 12220-12228 Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for sign permit approval to construct a new freestanding multi-tenant identification sign to replace an existing single-tenant identification sign at the southeast corner of Kirkmont Drive and Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, the proposed project consisting of .the construction of a new sign is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (e) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures, including accessory (appurtenant) structures; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support the findings for granting said sign permit approval and the following findings specified in City Code Section 15-30.: (a) The sign complies with the regulations of Article 15-30 and of the commercial district. The sign is located on the same site as the uses that it identifies. Because the site contains five separate uses and is in the commercial district, a freestanding identification sign is allowed. (b) The size, shape, color, illumination, placement and material of the sign are compatible with the building it identifies and the visual characteristics of the neighborhood and other lawful signs in the area. The sign is compliant with the height and area restrictions for a freestanding sign in a commercial district. The dark colors, stone, and redwood framing are compatible with the building it identifies and with the neighborhood. The source of illumination is internal fluorescent lighting, thereby preventing direct visibility of the primary source of light. (c) The location and design of the sign does not obscure from view or unduly detract from existing adjacent signs. The sign is set back from the comer and is located outside of the 50- foottriangle of visibility. It does not detract from existing signs on adjacent properties. (d) The location and design of a sign in close proximity to any residential district will not adversely affect the quality or character of such residential area. The site is surrounded by • commercial properties. WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support the findings specified in the Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road Gateway Design Guidelines, which were- adopted by the Saratoga City Council on November 19, 2003: (a) Signage should be visible but fit appropriately with building architecture. The natural materials and the dark colors used to accent the sign are designed to be consistent with the building and with the architectural guidelines for the Gateway District. (b) Sign materials should be complimentary and consistent with architectural materials. The redwood and stone sign materials are complimentary and consistent with the redwood trim and brick used on the adjacent building. (c) .Monument signs are to be placed so that they are visible to passing motorists. The height of the sign will inform pedestrians and passersby of the variety of businesses available onsite. (d) Commercial signs for the identification of multi-tenant projects or buildings should be ground mounted, internally or ground-lighted with a masonry base that is integrated with site landscaping. The sign will be internally lighted with a masonry base that is integrated with the existing and proposed landscaping. Now, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission. of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the application for sign approval has been approved and is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. The sign shall be located and constructed. as shown on Exhibit "A", incorporated by reference. The letters will not exceed 5 inches in height. 2. The height of the structure shall not exceed 7.5 feet, including the frame. 3. The total sign area shall not exceed 35 square feet. 4. The-sign will be located outside of the fifty-foot triangle of visibility. 5. The owner of the property, the Saratoga Management Company, will ensure that the landscaping is maintained at or above the current level. 6. All future landscaping shall be native and drought tolerant species in conformance with the City's xeriscape standards. 0 7. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into any future landscape plans to the extent feasible. CITY ATTORNEY 8. Applicant agrees to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. Section 2. A Building Permit must be issued and construction commenced within 36 months from the date of adoption of this Resolution or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15-90 of the Saratoga City. Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. C7 • q PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 12`'' day of Apri12006 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: John F. Livingstone, AICP Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and. conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date • -o • ,, • Attachment 2 • C7 • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, Denise Kaspar ,being duly sworn, deposes and -says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the 24 day of March, 2006, that I deposited in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to-wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15-45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara (updated March 10, 2006) as being owners of property within .500 feet of the property described as: 386-57-022 - 12220-12228 Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd.;that on said day there. was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. e 'se Kaspar Advanced Listing Services • City of Saratoga Community Development Department .13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 408-868-1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Saratoga's Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on: Wednesday, the 12th day of April 2006, at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held in -the City Hall .theater located- at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. The public hearing agenda item is stated below. Details of this item are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Please consult the City website at www.saratoga.ca.us regarding Friday office closures. APPLICATION/ADDRESS: 06-146 - 12220-12228 Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd. APPLICANT: Pro Signs, Inc. APN: 386-57-022 DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Design Review Approval to construct a freestanding identification sign. The total area of the sign is approximately 30 square feet and the height is 7 feet 3 inches. The net lot size is approximately 30,000 square feet and the site is zoned C-V. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above tune and place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a Public Hearing in court, you maybe limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing. In order for information to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed on or before Apri14, 2006. This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor's office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out-of--date information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to ail residents potentially affected by a project. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Suzanne Thomas Assistant Planner ' 408-868-1212 ~~ March 24, 2006 500 Ownership Listing Prepared for: 386-57-022 Pro Signs 1.2220-12228 Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road Saratoga CA 95070 366-12-065 366-12-072 366-12-054 Whitelaw Properties Llc Zoe Alameda-Fazotte Public Storage Props Ix Inc or Current Resident PO Box 25025 1033 Windsor St 12341 Sazatoga Sunnyvale Rd Glendale CA 91221 San Jose CA 95129 Saratoga CA 95070 366-22-006 wazd H & Carole Haensel H 366-22-022 366-22-033 Majid & Am;rn~ Novid o ~r Current Resident Danna Blue Hills Llc or Current Resident 20614 Ritanna Ct PO Box 5367 San Jose CA 95150 ~ 12143 Saratoga Villa Pl Saratoga CA 95070 Sazatoga CA 95070 366-22-034 ~ 366-35-001 366-35-002 Chandran E Cheriyan `sih D Ngo 3 James R Nowlin or Current Resident- Sr Current Resident 884 Tyner Way 20555 Oak Creek Ln 76 Saratoga Villa Pl Incline Village Nv 89451 Sazatoga CA 95070 oga CA 95070 366-35-003 366-35-004 366-35-005 3ecky C Lee Anita Palli Brian & ICristi Sackett ~r Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident ?0559 Oak Creek Ln 20563 Oak Creek Ln 20567 Oak Creek Ln Sazatoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 366-35-006 366-35-007 366-35-008 Sallan Jem K Lin Joan E Silver ~r Current Resident or Current Resident PO Box 130 ?0571 Oak Creek Ln 20575 Oak Creek Ln Los Altos CA 94023 Saratoga CA 95070 Sazatoga CA 95070 366-35-009 366-35-010 366-35-011 l~shwamber Yelsangikaz David A Dalton Greg Smith ~t Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 1?b05 Oak Creek Ln 20609 Oak Creek Ln 20615 Oak Creek Ln ~ratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070. Saratoga CA 95070 366-35-012 366-35-013 366-35-014 William A & Deborah Rawlings Byeung Lee Kenneth K Yamada ~r Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident '0619 Oak Creek Ln 20584 Oak Creek Ln 20580 Oak Creek Ln iaratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Sazatoga CA 95070 ~35-015 366-35-016 366-35-017 Lasser Mahallati Habbu Trust Haruhiro H Goto ~r Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident '0576 Oak Creek Ln 20572 Oak Creek Ln 20568.Oak Creek Ln 3azatoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 366-35-018 Cuddalore & Sathyabhama Bandar or Current Resident 20564 Oak Creek Ln Saratoga CA 95070 X56-36-002 Lori A Ellingboe or Current Resident .12347 Julie Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-005 Gerald R Harp or Current Resident 12335 Julie Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-008 Mercedes F Tan or Current Resident x2324 Julie Ln Saratoga CA 95070 ~f 6-36-011 Alice Tang or Current Resident 12312 Julie Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-014 Larry L West . or Current Resident 20623 Oak Creek Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-017 Leslie Mahan or Current Resident 20635 Oak Creek Ln Saratoga CA 95070 ?i66-36-020 Heather L Dawson or Current Resident 20647 Oak Creek Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-023 Victor Feinstein or Current Resident 20661 Oak Creek Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-026 Young E & Angela Rhee 1037 Bank Mill Rd Saratoga CA 95070 366-35-019, 020, 021 366-36-001 Oak Creek Investments or Current Resident 12241 Saratoga Sunnyvale Rd Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-003 Chang-Lee Chan or G~rrrent Resident 12343 Julie Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-006 Robert & Deborah Rodin or Cun ent Resident 12331 Julie Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-009 James W & Barbara Moore or Current Resident 12320 Julie Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-012 Joseph G & Valerie Marvin or Current Resident 12308 Julie Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-015 Linn N & Carolyn Hong or Current Resident 20627 Oak Creek Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-018 Eddie N & Leanne Lee 1398 Dry Creek Rd San Jose CA 95125 366-36-021 William A & Atsuko Bagley or Cun ent Resident 20653 Oak Creek Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-024 Tae Kim or Current Resident 20665 Oak Creek Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-027 Yuhsheng Tsuei or Current Resident 20636 Oak Creek Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-35-022 SCVWD 84 W Santa Clara St 460 San Jose CA 95113 366-36-004 Helen Feller or Current Resident 12339 Julie Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-007 Jonathan M & Mari Kaplan or Current Resident 12327 Julie Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-010. Jay C Gillis or Current Resident 12316 Julie Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-013 Curtner Investors or Current Resident 12300 Julie Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-016 Lida L Kon or Current Resident 20631 Oak Creek Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-019 Binu John or Current Resident 20643 Oak Creek Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-022 Yu-De Liou or Cun ent Resident 20657 Oak Creek Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-025 Manoj Jayadevan or Current Resident 20644 Oak Creek Ln Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-028 Sriruvasan &: Laths Sekar or Current Resident 20632 Oak Creek Ln Saratoga CA 95070 • • • ~~ 366-36-029 366-36-030 366-36-031 ~rh-Fan Chao Kwang & Shu Lin Bashyam Srinivasan ent Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident ~28 Oak Creek Ln 12301 Julie Ln 12305 Julie Ln Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 366-36-034 366-36-032 366-36-033 Xinbi Chen Wu Trust Bazbaza K Romandia or Current Resident 20656 Craig Ct 125 Cameros Ave 12319 Julie Ln Cupertino CA 95014 Aromas CA 95004 Saratoga CA 95070 366-56-001 366-56-002 366-56-003 James & Celia Kan Christopher Hon Zhong Q Hua or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 18088 King Ct 18060 King Ct 18026 King Ct Sazatoga CA 95070 Sazatoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 366-56-004 366-56-005 366-56-006 a rli Kathy Ushiba Current Resident r Current Resident o 11623 Spur Rd :1'$018 Kin Ct g 18196 Kenyon Ct Monterey CA 93940 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 366-56-007 366-56-021 366-56-022 Gregory & Renee Fujii Jas Trust Hiroyuki & Chiharu Matsunami or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 28 Kenyon Ct 18136 Arroyo Ln 18188 Kenyon Ct oga CA 95070 Sazatoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 366-56-023 366-56-024 366-56-025 John & Meiling Whitney Ellis -Hung Jung-Ming Tamg or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 18000 King Ct 18118 Arroyo Ln 17998 Arroyo Ln Saratoga CA 95070. Sazatoga CA 95070 Sazatoga CA 95070 366-56-026 366-56-027, 028 386-01-025 F~h~la N & Rati Mehrotra Saratoga Courtyards Llc Abdullah D & Haia Saah ~i Current Resident 1855 Park Ave 5852 Texas Ct 17990 Arroyo Ln San Jose CA 95126 San Jose CA 95120 aazatoga CA 95070 386-01-027 386-30-001 386-01-026 Saratoga National Bank N A Stuart P & Beverly Fitzpatrick Jf Plaza Partners L P or Cuurent Resident or Current Resident 50 California St 1500 12000 Sazatoga Sunnyvale Rd 20410 Kirkmont Dr San Francisco CA 94111 Sazatoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 386-30-003 386-30-004 386-30-002 Carolyn Bautista Richard J & $arbara Brendlen Esther & Alexander Ko or Current Resident or Current Resident 20703 Greenleaf Dr 12190 Kirkdale Dr 12200 Kirkdale Dr Cupertino CA 95014 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 30-005 386-30-006 386-3D-007 ~iordon R Smart Ye Chao & Zhang D John F & Susanne Mallory car Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 12222 Kirkdale Dr 12236 Kirkdale Dr 12258 Kirkdale Dr Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Sazatoga CA 95070 ~5 3.86-30-008 William R & Betty Benevento or Current Resident 12270 Kirkdale Dr Sazatoga CA 95070 386-30-039 Richard G & Mariette Williams or Current Resident 12230 Saratoga Sunnyvale Rd Saratoga CA 95070 386-33-061 Hau-Yung Chen or Current Resident 20377 Kirkmont Dr Saratoga CA 95070 386-52-027 I+Iaojiang Li or Current Resident 20395 Sea Gull Way Saratoga CA 95070 386-52-030 Slobodan & Margaret Galeb or Current Resident 20437 Sea Gull Way Saratoga CA 95070 386-Sb-001 Gene Ju or Current Resident X0430 Atrium Dr Saratoga CA 95070 ?8b-56-004 i`iandakumar S Palaniswamy or Current Resident 12091 Atrium Dr Saratoga CA 95070 386-56-007 Victor A & Larisa Moroz or Current Resident 12099 Atrium Dr Saratoga CA 95070 386-56-010 Eenwicke Holmes or Current Resident 1'2137 Atrium Dr waratoga CA 95070 386-56-013 Ge Bao L & Li Jing ~r Current Resident 12143 Atrium Dr Saratoga CA 95070 386-30-035 Marvin J Pennington 6447 Shadow Hawk Dr Citrus Heights CA 95621 386-33-016 Bo Wahlgren or Current Resident 12133 Natoma Ct Sazatoga CA 95070 386-33-062 Hsi Huang or Current Resident 20389 Kirkmont Dr Saratoga CA 95070 386-52-028 Yimei Deng or Current Resident 20409 Sea Gull Way Sazatoga CA 95070 386-52-031 Jeffrey J & Lynn Walker or Current Resident 20451 Sea Gull Way Sazatoga CA 95070 386-56-002 Edith Ard 7547 De La Fazge Dr Cupertino CA 95014 386-56-005 Vikram & Tanu Kohli or Current Resident 12093 Atrium Dr Sazatoga CA 95070 386-56-008 Kiran B Vittal or Current Resident 12133 Atrium Dr Saratoga CA 95070 386-56-011 Peiji Chen or Current Resident 12139 Atrium Dr Saratoga CA 95070 386-56-014 Ellen L Yang or G~urent Resident 12147 Atrium Dr Saratoga CA 95070 386-30-036, 037, 038 John Oliver PO Box 729 Mendocino CA 95460 386-33-017 Wen-Jei Ho or Current Resident 12155 Natoma Ct Saratoga CA 95070 386-33-063 May-I L Cho or Current Resident 20401 Kirkmont Dr Saratoga CA 95070 386-52-029 Roy M Welch 12340 Saratoga Sunnyvale Rd 10 Saratoga CA 95070 386-52-032,033 Mammini Corporation 333 W Santa Clara St 280 San Jose CA 95113 386-56-003 Yoshinori & Hiroko Murakami or Current Resident 20410 Atrium Dr Saratoga CA 95070 386-56-006 Natazajan & Sandhya Viswanatan or Current Resident 12097 Atrium Dr Sazatoga CA 95070 386-56-009 Pinghua Yang or Current Resident 12135 Atrium Dr Saratoga CA 95070 386-56-012 David E Tweten or Current Resident 12141 Atrium Dr Saratoga CA 95070 386-56-015 Changchuan A Lee or Current Resident 12149 Atrium Dr Saratoga CA 95070 ~f L • • •386-56-016 386-56-017 386-56-018 . elanie R Harris Rui Liu Arkadi & Regina Galicki ent Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 51 Atrium Dr 12153 Atrium Dr 12157 Atrium Dr Saratoga CA 95070 Sazatoga CA 95070 Sazatoga CA 95070 386-Sb-019 386-56-020 386-56-021 Louis A Runfola Jinbo & Jiajing Li Kenneth M & Elizabeth Silverman or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 12159 Atrium Dr 12175 Atrium Dr 12179 Atrium Dr $azatoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 . ,,$6-56-022 386-56-023 386-56-024 ?` ~ M Lerone Gnanalakshmi Vanninsegaram Walter N Sze ~r Current Resident or Current Resident 17255 Canyon Dr ?0415 Kirkmont Dr .20427 Kirkmont Dr Lake Oswego Or 97034 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 386-56-026 386-56-027 386-56-025 Leon D Kowaleski - Young Lee Mazgazet M & Donald Drenth or Current Resident or. Current Resident PO Box 20852 12198 Atrium Dr 12196 Atrium Dr San Jose CA 95160 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 386-56-028.. 386-56-029. 386-56-030 Charles & Ann Blackwell Marlene C Schmid Patrick J & Heidi Miller or Current Resident or Current Resident 14813 Felbridge Way 2 Atrium Dr 12190 Atrium Dr Midlothian Va 23113 ~oga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 7~6-56-031 386-56-032 386-56-033 harsh Oconnell Inyeol & Haeyoung Lee Mei-Long Kao sir Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident. x'2170 Atrium Dr 12158 Atrium Dr 121 S6 Atrium Dr Saratoga CA 95070. Saratoga CA 95070 Sazatoga CA 95070 386-56-034 386-56-035 Haimin & Hong Zhang 386-56-036 Giuseppina Diehl or Current Resident Charles P & Ruth Eggen 1532 Los Rios Dr 12150 Atrium Dr 12646 Plymouth Dr Saratoga CA 95070 San Jose CA 95120 Saratoga CA 95070 386-56-037 386-56-038 386-56-039 Hubert B & Jane Grabau Hazvey V & Kathy Kroll Shu-Chiung Chin or Current Resident or Ctirrent Resident p0 Box 2425 12136 Atrium Dr 12132 Atrium Dr Saratoga CA 95070 Sazatoga CA 95070 Sazatoga CA 95070 _~86-56=040 386-56-041 386-56-042 Mary Tallis ~?ebra Nishimura John W Davies or Current Resident ar Current Resident PO Box 2039 12098 Atrium Dr 12116 Atrium Dr Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 toga CA 95070 3 -56-043 386-56-044 386-56-045 Shirley Siporen Hsueh Chu Katharine J Jen ~r Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 12096 Atrium Dr 12092 Atrium Dr 12090 Atrium Dr Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Sazatoga CA 95070 386-57-003 386-57-004 386-57-002 Edward C & Vivian Mclaughlin Wang Man or Current Resident Irene Rothbaum PO Box 810490 2171 Manzanita Ave 12239 Atrium Cir Dallas Tx 75381 Menlo Park CA 94025 Sazatoga CA 95070 . 386-57-007 386-57-005 386-57-006 Cuie Zhao Katharine H Walker Mahendra & Jaymati Ranchod or Current Resident 2010 W Cliff Dr . 2220 Waverley St 12263 Atrium Cir Santa Cruz CA 95060 a, Palo Alto CA 94301 Sazatoga CA 95070 ?~86-57-008 386-57-009 Roselle Dance 386-57-010 John M Thompson .Ralph R Vanhine or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 12269 Atrium Cir 12275 Atrium Cir 12281 Atrium Cir Sazatoga CA 95070 Sazatoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 386-57-013 386-57-011 386-57-012 Gail Sheirbon Manjunath Ramaiah Salvatore R & Onorina Furiosi or Current Resident or Current Resident 12792 Miller-Ave Atrium Cir 12299 12287 Atrium Cir Sazatoga CA 95070 . Saratoga CA 95U70 Sazatoga CA 95070 386-57-014 386-57-015 _.386-57-016 Chamberlain Sridhaz & Vishall Tirumala Yeh Trust ~r. Current Resident or Current Resident i or Current Resident 12284 Atrium Cir J;2296 Atrium Cir ~ r 12290 Atrium C Sazatoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 ;aratoga CA 95070 386-57-018 386-57-019 386-57-017 Dongjae & Kun Lee Ursula Anderson Cecil S & M Blinn or Current Resident or Current Resident PO Box 3452 12230 Atrium Cir 12224 Atrium Cir Sazatoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 386-57-020 386-57-021 386-57-022 Frances Reigehnan John H & Nola Heindel Sachi E & Tatsuko Adachi or Current Resident PO Box 3452 20431 Cumm~gham Pl 12218 Atrium Cir Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 386-60-001 386-60-002,004 386-60-003 Hwai Hsi Lindy Properties I John E Keenan or Current Resident or Cunrent Resident r..r Current Resident 2280 Saratoga Sunnyvale Rd 101 x 12280 Sazatoga Sunnyvale Rd 201 12280 Saratoga Sunnyvale Rd-103 . $Aratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070. Sazatoga CA 95070 386-60-006 386-60-008 386-60-005, 007, 017, 019 Shigeru Sasaki Andy Liu Sarvajit Thakur or Current Resident 2023 Hayworth Dr 21537 Saratoga Heights Dr 12280 Saratoga Sunnyvale Rd 205 San Jose CA 95148 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 386-60-010 386-60-012 386-60-009, 011 H M Chen Donald P & Susan Duvall Sanjay & Shilpi Minocha or Current Resident 18570 Blythswood Dr 1027 Calaveras Ridge Dr 12280 Saratoga Sunnyvale Rd 209 Los Gatos CA 95030 Milpitas CA 95035 Sazatoga CA 95070 ~~ 386-60-013, 015 ane & Suzie Fong urrent Resident 80. Sazatoga Sunnyvale Rd 113 Saratoga CA 95070 . ~g6-60-018 386-60-020 Dennis M Cunningham 1 G-Kite Hill Rd Santa Cruz CA 95060 386-60-024 Roy S Wolf or Current Resident 12280 Saratoga Sunnyvale Rd 210 Saratoga CA 95070 386-60-028,030 Kosich Construction Co 18867 Kosich Dr Sazatoga CA 95070 y • 386-60-014 Bezdjian Ara R 1922 The Alameda 214 San Jose CA 95126 386-60-021386-60-023 Girard F & Mary Caracciolo or Current Resident 12280 Saratoga Sunnyvale Rd 112 Saratoga CA 95070 386-60-026 386-60-032 Granum Limited PO Box 2460 Saratoga CA 95070 386-60-016 386-60-031. Nmsbpcsldhb PO Box 2460 Sazatoga CA 95070 386-60-022, 025 Roy S Mollazd PO Box 1235 Saratoga CA 95071 386-60-027 386-60-029 Emspec Llc or Current Resident 12280 Saratoga Sunnyvale Rd 106 Sazatoga CA 95070 '~ • • • • • Attachment 3 • • • • ao • • Attachment 4 • • • . VIE r ~ ~ ~~.~. 4: .. .;; ~A~ ~ _ ;, ~,~ r _x.~. •, _ k . 'r; ~~~ a~ • • • ~~ • • Attachment S • Neighbor Notification Template for ! Development Applications ~ ~ ~ [~ 0 ~ [~ Date: ~ ~ "I ®~ PROJE T RESS: 12220 - 12228 Saratoga Sunnyvale Road MAR 2 $ 2006 CITY OF SARATOGA Applicant Name: Saratoga Management Company ~"' ^~AUNITY DEVELOP"i"~ Application Niun6er: 06~-145 The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta~'and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take- this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of ScrrotoRa. 5~ ~/ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the following: I have. reviewed the project plans; I understand-the stove of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additi^o/nal sheets if necessary): / v/~ Neighbor Name: X0.11 i Cl ~ • ~~ l~ ~ ~ Il ~ ~ Q ~~ Neighbor Address: ~ quo a c:,.,,.,.,,~e• • Neighbor Phone #: ~~o ~ - ~~ printed: I~gU ~ D C~. ~?G - ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1^ I City of Saratoga ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t +~ ~ ~ ~ ~ } p, d Planning Department ~~ Neighbor Notification Template for ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 / / Development Applications MAR 2 8 2006 Date: C~ ~ 7" /6~ PROJECT ADDRESS: 12220 - 12228 Saratoga Sunnyvale Road CITY OF SARATOGA --~~ni1N~TYDEVELO°" Applicant Name: Saratoga Management Company Apprcation Number: 06=145 The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Stafj'and the Plcstning C©mm~ss~on prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues-they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the. signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. ~y signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the following: I have. reviewed the .project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): • ~v ~~~~~~~~ Neighbor Name• Neighbor Address: 6 ~ ,~ ~ _ Neighbor Phone #: ~~ ~ °`?.S`S'~ 9S^~ Signatwe: ~~ City of Saratoga Printed: ~~D ~~ ~~ ~ ~ eGl> 'r l~ jt G CAN CP . h [` c~ ~«-~ 'f~ L~ Ste: ~ t1~ •~ r`o ~~ s s~f~~ Planning Department C7 ~u . Neighbor Notification Template for J ~ ~ {~ ~ d ~ . ~ Development Applications U- 3 ~ ~~ MAR 2 8 2006- - Date: PROJE AD RESS: 12220 - 12228 Saratoga Sunnyvale Road ~~Ty of SAw~TO~ A -- •*nt1N1TY DEVE! ~- Applicant Name: Saratoga Management Company Application Number: 06=~45 The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to-the public hearing. Stafj'and the Planning Comm~issit»t prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. ~/ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the. following: I have. reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): N Neighbor Nam Neighbor Address: ~C~~ C~ ~~ ~~ Neighbor Phone #: Signature: ~ Printed: ~, G4r ~ `in~> `1PPw u~~ s~ 3/z~/cc .i s~ _ City of Saratoga ~"~° ' `' ` `~ `~ ' ~ ` `' ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ s ~ S H u f z ~ Planning Department Sc ~~ a.r T~~•~ ar ~~_ '~- ~ Neighbor Notification Template for Development Applicafions Date: - b PROJECT ADDRESS: 12220. 12228 Saratoga Sunnyvale Road Applicant Name: Saratoga Management Company .~ ~~C~Od~ '~ LIAR 2 8 200 CITY OF SARATOGA Application Number: 06=145 The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their. neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. StajEJ'and the Planning Comm~ss~on~ prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. 9 r./ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I do NOT have- any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the following: I have. reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional )sheets 'f necessary): Ll'/ Neighbor Name: ~' ~1 Neighbor Address: Signature: Neighbor Phone #: GAO c~ / ~ ~ 6 ~~3 Printed: lt~~ 3/2 ~ City of Saratoga ~ CG:i [e.-hJ s~ e ~ ~ G /C ~'~.«f J/Qk a~a! s~P /~J n G ~ ~~ ~ 7.(0 S ~lc~ . ~ /"w k Planning Department SG 2 a.,.. ~.~ e~v,~ C t • ~~0 ' r Notification Tem late for `~ Net~~~o Development Applications MqR 2 g 2006 Date: CITY OF SARATOGA PROJECT ADDRESS: 12220 - 12228 Saratoga Sunnyvale Road - - ~*n, I~iTy DEVEL~°' Applicant Name: Saratoga Management Company App cation Number: 06=145 The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Staff and the Plaanning Cornmissior~ prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you _ may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. h~ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the following: I have. reviewed -the :project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): ~~ Neighbor Name: ~ Y1 ~ 5-~ r ~ i ~ Neighbor Address~~:22 ~l~S~ 0 CJY'U~~cia~~Yl ~~ . S~ ~ -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Neighbor Phone #: ~ °1 ~~ S ~ ~ ignatwe: - ~2 9 /gun S..{.. /,,.j -City of Saratoga ``~ ~' '" `~ Printed: ~_5~~~\~ ~v~~ a r~ ~ rr<S 2 S~c ~~-) ~~r ~ fro ~+c~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ Planning Department a~ Neighbor Notification Template for `~ Development Applications MqR 2 g 2006 Date: ~ Z•'~' ~~ CITY Of SARATOGA PROJEC RESS: 12220 - 12228 Saratoga Sunnyvale Road - ••~„>~-Ty pEvEr ~~- Applicant Name: Saratoga Management Company Application Number: 06=145 The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta,~''and the Planning Co»rm~issiorr prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you -may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. y~ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature. below certifies the following: I have. reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Neighbor Name: /~ ~r ~~~ Neighbor Address: 12~~ ~"y~'-1~r,~ - ~~-,~~~''~ Neighbor Phone #: 2'Z.~'a3d~ Si afore: Printed: 3/zq~~ ~ ~ s~ o ~ r -Fz R ~h City of Saratoga Planning Department • • .SGkHFr ~~c~G ~~ Neighbor Notification Template for J Development Apphcahons Date: 'tz ~~ MAR 2 8 2006 PRO CT DRESS: 12220 - 12228 Saratoga Sunnyvale Road ciTV of snRnTOCn Applicant Name: Saratoga Management Company Application Number: 06=145 The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prier to the p~eblic hearing. Staff and the Planing C©ss~on prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. h' ,~My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I - understand the scope of work; and I do NOT have any .concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature. below certifies the following: I have. reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): ~/~ Neighbor Name: ~I ~ ryt. ~ ~e-u ~Z' ~^ ~ Neighbor Address: O titer Ix~ '' ~,~.N..1 d r-P l ~*~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Ci~' ~S f> l ~~y Y :- Signature: Neighbor Phone #: ~~•~ ~~~" ~ 7'~0 ~ Printed: ~.t ~. v S LU .[. ,e ~ +~ v ~ GJ n ~ c cs, C e ~ yr r ~ / 2 r/ /G ~ . ~ S! ~ ~ o ~ ~ Sij- -P Ph 07 pF~ r ~ City of Saratog4a Planning Department Neighbor Notification Template for Development Applications Date: 3~-z ~ ° ~' _ PROJECT ADDRESS: 12220 - 12228 Saratoga Sunnyvale Road Applicant Name: Saratoga Management Company MAR 2 8 2006 CITY OF SARATOGA .,~eit~-TYDFVE~^~~ Application Number: 06=145 The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Pkmnin~gand issues when solocited by favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their cone applicants prior to -the public hearing. Staff and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they nary have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you nary reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. h~ / ,/ My signature below certifies the following: I -have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on .the proposed project. My signature below certifies the following: I have. reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): • n I ~ , C YCc Neighbor Name: ~ ~ ~ Neighbor Address: ~." `{ Neighbor Phone #: ~~-(7 ~C~- ~' ~"~ ~- Signature: Printed: / 2~,/e, ~ t S~ _~ ~-~ f~a r ~ S'ew~1 of ./ ~e lic~l he Cefe-e ~~: . City of Saratoga ` ~ `` ~ ~~° S~ y` ' Planning Department ~~ ~~ .~ , ~o Neighbor Notification Template for Development Applications ' Date: ~' t) 6 PROJECT ADD SS: 12220 - 12228 Saratoga Sunnyvale Rood Applicant Name: Saratoga Management Company l~J ~ ~ U L5 MAR 2 8 2006 CITY OF SARATOGA Application Number: 06=145 The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Staff and -the Planning Comm}ssion~ prcfcr that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. ti~ My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the following: I have. reviewed the project plans; I , understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with- the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): /~ Neighbor Name: ~e " r ~ Neighbor Address: Z~ ~ ~/`~ S ~'~t`o9Gt. SGlTSS1/du~~ s kV~~ ~ ~ Neighbor Phone #: C ~a ~~ ~ 9 ~ 9 9 6~ Signatwe: Printed: ~ ~ c t /, c C c., c' c r .. f ci ~ c ., l . f,~. Silo, . SL?aMK / FCIy,Cr City of Saratoga Planning Departm ~ ~ /~- 31 Neighbor Notification Template for ,~ Development Applications Date: ~ PRO C AD SS: 12220 - 12228 Saratoga Sunnyvale Road Applicant Name: Saratoga Management Company ~6~~~~ MAR 2 8 Z00~ CITY OF SARATOGA Application Number: 06=145 The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications. prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Staf}'and the Planning Commission-prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to-the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it fo the City of Saratoga. `~ / My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the. following: I have. reviewed the .project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Neighbor Name: (~~{ ~~ W d ~ Neighbor Address: ~~-~_.~, L°~-- Neighbor Phone #: y~`~~~3 ~Z Z.3 ~ Signature: Printed: ~~ City of Saratoga Planning Department 312 S ~~~ C 1 SrcGe ~c /~ac7 ~'ee ° "`~ Sc ~~`. Td~~~f t~Al sic • • 3a Neighbor Notification Template for ~ ~ ~ {~ 0 ~ ~ ~ Development Applica~ons Date: ~ ~- • d ~ MAR 2 8 2006 PRO CT ADDRESS: ,12220 - -12228 Saratoga Sunnyvale Road ciTY of sA~TOCA Applicant Name: Saratoga Management Company Application Number: 06=145 The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors. to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look- favorablyupon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the pubEic hearing. Staj}'and the Planning Comm~issiort prefer that- neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the -right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the - City of Saratoga. `'~ / M si afore below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I Y ~ understand the scope of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues. which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project: S My signature below certifies the following: I have. reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional she is if necessary): . ~ C l /ZEN e f~~% ~/ Neighbor Name. ~ lt.~CP~~ / Neighbor Addre ZZ ~ - N ./c~~~. ?r ~ Q ~ >Q Neighbor Phone #: d - ZS 2 • ~~ Si e: Printed: (~~ O ~ Q.-d s/~e hc~ hG ~.« ~e-.; f 3 l2bl a C i s~~4~ w,~ Pa+f~, H.,~~j Ci o Sarato a `` ~ "} IMF S ; y tj, f g S ~ z ~~ ,~ TI ~.,,~ r Planning Department ~s ?~ 33 Neighbor Notification Template for Development Applications Date• ~~ ~ PRO CT DRE S: 12220 - 12228 Saratoga Sunnyvale Rood Applicant Name: Saratoga Management Company ~~~0~~ MAR 2 8 200 CITY OF SARATOGA Application Number: Ob=145 The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Staj, j''and the Planning Comn4ission~ prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. `'~ / My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the following: I have. reviewed the .project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Neighbor Name: QU I ~I'lOS . Neighbor Address: 12105 SUrr~Ga ~JU-'1r1Y 1/a ~ ~ ~~ Neighbor Phone #: 408) 44~ -445~- Signature: Printed: • ~~e . Andrea l-a'~r~ S,s~ , 3 29/~~ d e " ~ " C /~ '7 ,/ 1 s _G P ~ T'/~'/~~'c 1c,C~6 ~ . a.~/ s~ / ~. City of Saratoga Planning Department Neighbor Notification Template for Development Applications Date: 0'3 ~24-~ Co PROJECT ADDRESS: 12220 - 12228 Saratoga Sunnyvole Road Applicant Name: Saratoga Management Company Neighbor Phone #: ~ o ~_~-~'~ Printed: ~,~ 1~(~R4~ 2,t Application Number: 06=145 The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. ?'he Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. StafJ'and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure- the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the-right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. ti~ ~y signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the following: I have. reviewed the project plans;. I understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): ~ 1~~. Neighbor Name: ~i~~.~ l ~ ~ A ~ . = Neighbor Address: a S~~° r~ ~j~~~~C T S~[ l.~ City of Saratoga. ~ i5~~~ U ~ ~~ L MAR 2 8 2006 CITY OF SARATOGA T~ /\!2C J~"G YC ~7/ P4~ p Op/ ago S ~ s~ . ~ ~1w l.c co.. cp ~~ r Planning Department Sc zu h~~ 7~~~~ , Neighbor Notification Template for Development Applications Date: ~~ ~~ PRO CT ADDRESS: 12220 - 12228 Saratoga Sunnyvale Rood Applicant Name: Saratoga Management Company LS~~D U i MAR 2 8 20 CITY OF SARATOGA Application Number: 06=145 The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably- upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta}f and the Planning Commis#on prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you -may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. h~ /My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the. following: I have. reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Neighbor Name: ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ l~ fQ S-t~~~ t°~-~ C ~ Neighbor Address: ~ G4 YIN ~~~ ~ ` Neighbor Phone #: ~Gl ~ ' -~ ~ ~ ~ / ~1' Printed: M J ~I? ~ i7~lvl City of Saratoga ~ Planning Department S • • ill w n 'y , /-/ %~ ~ ~; • • Neighbor Notification Template for Development Applications Date: ~ ~~ PROJEC ADDRESS: 12220 - 12228 Saratoga Sunnyvale Road Applicant Name: Saratoga Management Company CITY Of SARATOGA Application Number: 06=145 The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of. the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta,~}''and the Planning Co»rm~ission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly. to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing, on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to~ the City of Saratoga. ti~ ~y signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the following: I have. reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): _... Name: ~ ~~~~~ Neighbor Neighbor AddCress: ~~l 7~r~ ~ ~ ~~. I~ ~"G d Nei bor Phone #: '^ U~ ~u'~ '~~ ~~~~~ ~ Signature: d: ~a~ City of Saratoga Planning Department ~~~o~r MAR 2 8 2006 31 I~ !; Neighbor Notification Template for Development Applications Date: 312X~o~ PROJECT ADDRESS: 12220 - 12228 Saratoga Sunnyvale Ro®d MqR 2 g 2006 Applicant Name: Saratoga Management Company c~TY of saw~TOCa _ _ "~4UNlTY DEVELOP' `~. Application Number: Ob=145 The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. StafJand -the Planning Comnrissiorr prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the -City of Saratoga. My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the. following: I have. reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): ~~~ Neighbor Name: u.G Neighbor Address: 2 S r ~ V ~~ ~~ ~y~, ~ Y o,o Neighbor Phone #: k ° ~" ~ ~.~ ' y~8 ~ Signature: Printed: G~ ~~ City of Saratoga .Planning Department '~ Neighbor Notification Template for Development Applications Date: ~ ~ ~ PRO CT ADDRESS: 12220 - 12228 Saratoga Sunnyvale Road Applicant Name: Saratoga Management Company uu MAR 2 8 2406 LuJ CITY OF SARATOGA " "' "'~^l1NlTY DEVELO!" '~~ Application Number: Ob=145 The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Staff and the Planning Comm~iss~on~ prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure. the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you. may reserve -the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I do NOT have. any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the following: I have. reviewed the .project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion .. with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additi nal sheets if necessary): %Y City of Saratoga Neighbor Phone #: Planning Department ~~ Neighbor Name: • Attachment 6 • r O N 4 N Q1 _~ ~~r~ ' ItQ~NN~ 3 X G~ W N ;~OOOo ~ ~~N N ~p (fi~DO~t 7 ~~ p ~ ~ ~ N i 0 CnN~W 3c~~Nal ~a I' ~~ I i i ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~I ~ ~ I ~ .. i II u L ~' JLI8IHX~ -. ~, n ~ „{ ~ e o CJl o > O ~ rn ~~ _-°" 0 m C1 S m cn ~y-r n .~. m D~ ~v a , '.; ~-N ~'~ N X ,~. X ~ ~ ~ rn ~ °o- m 3 ~ m fl- a o w o o cn o. ~' fl. cu .a ~o ~ ~ N (D y. p ~. ~~ ~~ m - ~ o. ~, ~~ o ~ = m ~p Q A ~ O ~ Q rt ~ co n~ S Q CD t0 ~~• m rn oo~ ~ o p~ O~,X ~ ~ C ~ ~x~n; ~~rn-X ~CO~o .: sm ~~m o~~~ ~3p-~ 3 ~. C~ N N ~ ~" ti, • fD n n "~' Q m n°~~N~~ ~~ _a m ~ .'~'+ 7 ~ ~ r4 i C~ •~ ___~ ~_ CO C O O C7 =- O CV o '-- N ~ ~ f1 n n ~ } ~ O ~; ~ F}-- ~~ Q U ~~ ~-=J `~ • 1 -. ~:~ T ~~~n~ ~- - 2to0 ~ . 996 ~ .~I040ds j 2200. ' 1 ,¢g' ~ .~ ;i LEASED ~.. -r-- ~ - --------- ----1---- --~------ .1. e - ~, ' ( ~ ;` , ~ ~ ~ ' J:. _._"75:.x\ . ~ ~~ i i ~ i t ~ r~.t lls.~tw~+ 7 q / '~ /~' 4 0 ~ 1~Ci1o G vCitv~A..l tpr 1 Q4~.+~ . ~ • F o ~ 34 ~ ~.~~~~'`~ ~ i W ~~S Sa ~ z4` wIG.~ S~6J SOS ~e.Y-S't-AC. S ~'~'"~4A / svN.wv R ~.E ¢oh~ 5~4~ _ .~- -_ ---- - - - - 15330 Los Gatos E~Ivd. PROJECT: APPROVED: SALESPERSON: ~ Los Gatos, Ca 95032 ~ SAvr•' "~~"^` • ~°•~C ~ ~~~ ~~D 1 ------ ---- Tel. 408.358.121 8 -- - _. __.. ANC Fax. 4 0 8.3 5 8.15 6 5 CONTACT: DATE: ~ ;CREATED BY: LOS GATOS signs®prosigns.com D~tv Nlantw,~s to . -7.os ~; R...b • PARK SARATOGA SHOPPING CENTER ~Z7Z©^Z ~ Prospect. Road at Saratoga/Sunnyvale Raad Saratoga, California BUI4DING "D" Total Rentablc-Area 7184 Sq. Ft. -, `~ -~ • ~ ~. ~~~ ~ 4 2006 cll~v or s.~wa~roc~a ~. _ ~ r _• • M_ 'I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~J r~ - ~ aNR 4 2006 CITY OF sAwaTOGA _ 60" x 72" x 10"deep painted duranodic bronze alpminum illuminated cabinet with 15)10.5" x 69.5" lezan `sign faces - 118" white acrylic with duranodic bronze lettering 12) 4"x 6" redwood posts painted to match hld 11)12" x 72"redwood dome topper painted to match bldg Address numbers in dimensional lettering -painted white- . 8~ '' ,Overall height stands at 87"-tall N I I E$ _~ . _ _ i I , r~1 ~" n ~ ~ _ s t.1~ m K. 4 ~{,,,~ PosZ' -~ = - - - _ ----~ - - ---- - - y~ ---- E - - - - ---- - - -_- _ ~ .--_ - _ - 3 ~ o- I ~ - r~ t~ - s d i~ £ ~ ~ - o F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ " ` `~ ~ ~ ,. IZ I., , ~f~•.ea~s ~- -6%T I - _...~ 1 ~ N I s; ~ ,~- of ~ e.~ ~ L ", a e~ L -- - _ _ ,, 15330 Los Gatos Blvd. PROJECT: Sk4A, : v-~bm+~ (,~, APPROVED: ~~ I SALESPERSON: ¢`~ Los Gatos, Ca 95032 _ _ Te I. 4 O 8.3 5 8.1 2 18 - ---- - -- --- _ ---------- ------ we Fax. 4 0 8.3 5 8.15 6 5 CONTACT: !7 ~cu- .,~ cR~, ~ DATE: ~ , 31 C ` CREATED BY: Q,~„ ~ LOS GATOS signs®proslgns.com ___._~~__ -______ Item 2 ~ REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No./Location: Type of Application: ApplicantlOwner: Staff Planner: • 14289 Sobey Road f :_. Date: I APN: 03-254;14289 Sobey Road Design Review Priscilla and Jeffrey Ho, Property Owner Therese M. Schmidt, Associate Planne~~ Apri112, 2006 397-03-004 Department Head: John Livingstone, CP, Dir for __ ~- ~~ ! ~ ~ 4` ~ -- ~ ~ ~ ---- a I ' / / CIHSTER~V .- _-._ _ ~ _ ~ I reF7t~siffr~ C " - -- •~ '~ ~ 1 ~ i ' -.~"- ._._. - ~ .aex ~sto _ - ~ I _ - _ ~c-i Rd~ \ - -_ ~ i ~ \~ " ~.r-/ I ~ ~ ~ M~CT ~ i ~ ) \ ~l `T ]y_ TEN A i ~. i . y ._ ~ ~- ~ ~ . ~, ~ ' , ~ / ...~~ NFLT~Vrv ~ 1 - . 1 _ _y~ :\ TEHACia~'S AD ~ ~ __ ~ "y ~ - - ~EAEMID Cf q^p WOm Rp 0.D WOm R OB ~~~`^ / I _ I ~ r ~ ~ l r - - -.. ~ ~ I --.. ~_I ~.~ ~, i ~ ~ ~ RofeCt SRe ~ ` ~ i 1.... ~- ~.. _, f - ~ E_J FBrce6 withn 500 ft .j"~: ~ ~ I I ~ ~. ,:.~ %• ' ~ ~ ;' ---- ` " I i '~, , ~; ,--• o zoo aao eoo eoo ~ooo n W N ~' E s Application No. 03-254; 14289 Sobey Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY: Application filed: 11/12/04 Application Heard and Continued by the Planning Commission: 05/12/04 Revised Plans Deemed Complete by Staff: 03/20/06 Notice published: 03/29/06 Mailing completed: 03/21/06 Posting completed: 04/04/06 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant originally requested design review approval to construct atwo-story single- family residence with attached garage and a basement. At maximum height the proposed residence would be 26-feet. The proposed residence including garage would be 5,230 square-feet. The Planning Commission expressed concerns regarding the design and the integration of the structure into the hillside and surrounding neighborhood. The Commission continued the item to a date uncertain to provide the applicant with an opportunity to redesign the project. The applicant has redesigned the proposal, including shifting the building pad off the top of the slope approximately 25-feet towards Sobey Road, and is requesting Design Review Approval to construct atwo-story single-family residence with an attached garage consisting of 5,296 square-feet, a 605 square-foot basement/wine cellar, a 400 square-foot carport, and swimming pool. The maximum height of the residence is 26-feet. STAFF RECONIlVIENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the application for Design Review with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. C, • 2 Application No. 03-254; 14289 Sobey Road • • • STAFF ANALYSIS GENERAL PLAN: Residential Very Low Density Maximum Dwelling Units per Acre 1.09 MEASURE G: Not Applicable PARCEL SIZE: 47,045 square-feet (Gross) 30,109 square-feet (Net) SLOPE: 22% Average Site Slope 18% Slope at Building Site GRADING REQUIRED: 1,148 Cubic yards of Cut 728 Cubic Yards of Fill 420 Cubic Yards of Export ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed project which includes construction of a new two story residence is categorically exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15303 of the Guidelines for the Implementation of CEQA. This Class 3 exemption applies to construction of asingle-family home. PROJECT DATA: Proposal -Code Requirements Lot Coverage: House Carport Air conditioning unit Pool equipment Rear yard Patios & Walks Pool & spa Front yard, patios & Walk Decomposed granite path Driveway Trash Enclosure Retaining Walls TOTAL Floor Area: First floor Second Floor Garage TOTAL 3,280 sq. ft. 400 sq. ft 50 sq. ft. 82 sq. ft. 2,658 sq. ft. 645 sq. ft. 550 sq. ft. 803 sq. ft. 6,931 sq. ft. 52 sq. ft. 375 sq. ft Maximum Allowable 33% 35% 15,826 sq. ft. 16,466 sq. ft. 2,614 sq. ft. 2,047 sq. ft. 635 sq. ft. Maximum Allowable 5,296 sq. ft. 5,298 sq. ft. 3 Application No. 03-254; 14289 Sobey Road Basement: Carport: Setbacks: Height: Maximum Allowable TOTAL 605 sq. ft. 3,249 sq. ft. Governed by Set-backs and Impervious Coverage. Meets Code TOTAL 400 sq. ft. requirements. Front Reaz Left Side (South) Proposal Minimum Requirement ls` story 106 ft. 30 ft. 2°d story 121 ft. lst story 115 ft. 50 ft. 2°a story 136 ft. 60 ft. 1 S` story 20 ft. 13 ft. 6-in. 2°d Story . 28 ft. 18 ft. 6-in. Right Side (North) 1 S` story 34 ft. 13 ft. 6-in. 2°a story 38 ft. 18 ft. 6-in. At the topmost point of the structure Maximum Allowable 26-ft. 26 ft. PROJECT DISCUSSION: Zoning Code Section 15-45.060(1) requires Design Review Approval by the Planning Commission for any new multi-story main structure. The applicant requests Design Review Approval to construct atwo-story single-family residence with an attached gazage consisting of 5,296 square-feet, a 605 squaze-foot basement/wine cellaz, a 400 squaze-foot carport, and swimming-pool. The maximum height of the residence is 26-feet. The floor area of the proposed first floor is 2,614 square-feet and the second floor is 2,047 square-feet. The applicant is proposing a Mediterranean style home with California Tuscan and Monterey influences including asecond-story reaz balcony cantilevered and covered by the principal roof. Proposed materials consist of the roofing and a mix of exterior finishes including stucco, stone, and wood. The proposed color pallet is muted earth tones. The proposed structure is set back 115-feet from the front property line and is set at an angle, which reduces the visual impact of the building so that the building does not appear bulky or massive. In addition, there is an existing eucalyptus -grove located between the • 4 Application No. 03-254; 14289 Sobey Road property line and Sobey Road in the public right-of--way, which will provide .additional screening from Sobey Road. The front entry is appropriately scaled and proportional. Utilization of varying window designs lends interest and architectural integrity to the structure. Rooflines from the first floor effectively break-up the mass and bulk of the second story. Hipped rooflines also minimize mass and bulk. The three-car garage does not dominate the front facade; instead, it has been well designed to minimize visual impacts to Sobey Road. The garage is attached to the main residence; however, it has been shifted to an angle giving the appearance of a detached garage. The applicant is proposing a detached, 15-foot tall, two-car carport/gazebo. The carport/gazebo will be fully enclosed on the north elevation, partially enclosed on the west elevation, and be open with decorative columns and-light fixtures on the south elevation. The proposed roofing and exterior materials will match the proposed home. Neighbor Correspondence The applicant has re-circulated the City's Neighbor Notification Form with the revised drawings and has received four responses (copies of the Forms are located in Attachment No. 3), all have which have indicated that they have reviewed the plans and do not have any concerns or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant. • Geotechnical Clearance As conditioned, the proposal has received geotechnical clearance to proceed. Trees The Arborist Reports, dated November 28, 2003, July 21, 2005, February 17, 2006, and March 20, 2006, details project impacts on the existing trees. The proposed project exposes 24 protect trees to development impacts. However, no protected trees are proposed for removal. A tree bond in the amount of $61,430.00 will be required as a condition of approval to ensure compliance with all arborist conditions. General Plan Findings The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan including the following Policies: Conservation Element Policy 6.0 -Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development The proposal has been redesigned to place the building pad lower on the slope of the parcel, which will reduce visual impacts of the development. The proposal will not unreasonably block the views of the surrounding hills from neighboring parcels, nor will it be visible from major streets. Land Use Element Policy S.0 -The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the Findings required for 5 Application No. 03-254; 14289 Sobey Road Design Approval. The proposed square footage and height are comparable to the neighborhood. The existing neighborhood consists of a variety of architectural styles. The architectural style proposed will provide additional variety lending to a unique neighborhood with a distinct sense of place. Design Review Findings The proposed project is consistent with all the following Design Review findings stated in MCS 15-45.080: (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The maximum height of the proposed two-story dwelling is 26-feet. The structure has been redesigned to ensure that the proposal does not unreasonably interfere with views and privacy of the abutting neighbors. The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the views from Sobey Avenue. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. No protected trees are proposed for removal on the site and three redwood groves will be maintained as well several other smaller oak and fruit trees. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. The proposal is not requesting removal of Native and/or Heritage trees. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulb The applicant is proposing a neutral color • pallet for the exterior building, window trim and roofing materials as well as incorporating varying rooflines and exterior building materials to reduce the perception of excessive bulk. In addition, the applicant is proposing greater set- backs than are required, which will also reduce the visual impact of the proposed second-story addition. (e) Compatible bulk and height. Residences in the area are predominately one and two-story. The proposal is compatible in bulk and height with the neighborhood. (fJ Current grading and erosion control methods. The proposal shall conform to the City's current grading and erosion control standards. (g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to all of the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the fmdings above and staff report. Conclusion Staff finds that all of the Design Review findings can be made in the affirmative and the proposal is consistent with the General Plan. • 6 Application No. 03-254; 14289 Sobey Road STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find this Application exempt from CEQA and approve the application for Design Review with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution of Approval. 2. Affidavit of mailing notices and mailing labels for project notification. 3. Neighbor notification Templates. 4. Arborist reports from November 28, 2003, July 21, 2005, February 17, 2006, -and March 20, 2006. 5. Letter from the applicant dated January 26, 2006, addressing Design Review Findings. 6. Reduced plans, exhibit "A." • 7 • • Attachment 1 • RESOLUTION NO. Application No. 03-254 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Ho: 14289 Sobey Road WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review Approval to construct atwo-story single-family residence with an attached garage consisting of 5,296 square-feet, a 605 square-foot basement/wine cellar, a 400 square-foot carport, and a swimming pool. The maximum height of the residence is 26- feet. The gross lot size is 47,045 square-feet and the net lot size is 30,109 square-feet. The site is zoned R-1-40,000; and WHEREAS, Zoning Code Section 15-45.060(1) requires Design Review Approval by the Planning Commission for any new -multi-story main structure; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, The proposal is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources-Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-family residences; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Design Review, and is consistent with the following General Plan Policies: Conservation Element Policy 6.0 -Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development The proposal has been redesigned to place the building pad lower on the slope of the parcel, which will reduce visual impacts of the development. The proposal will not unreasonably block the views of the surrounding hills from neighboring parcels, nor will it be visible from major streets. Land Use Element Policy S.0 -The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the. site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the Findings required for Design Approval. The proposed square footage and height are comparable to the neighborhood. The existing neighborhood consists of a variety of architectural styles. The • Application No. 03-254; 14289 Sobey Road architectural style proposed will provide additional variety lending to a unique neighborhood with a distinct sense of place. WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support the fmdings required for said application for Design Review. Approval, as set forth below: (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The maximum height of the proposed two-story. dwelling is 26-feet. The structure has been redesigned to ensure that the proposal does not unreasonably interfere with views and privacy of the abutting neighbors. The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the views from Sobey Avenue. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. No protected trees are proposed for removal on the site and three redwood groves will be maintained as well several other smaller oak and fruit trees. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. The proposal is not requesting removal of Native and/or Heritage trees. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulb The applicant is proposing a neutral color pallet for the exterior building, window trim and roofing materials as well as incorporating varying rooflines and exterior building materials to reduce the perception of excessive bulk. In addition, the applicant is proposing greater set- backs than are required, which will also reduce the visual impact of the proposed second-story addition. (e) Compatible -bulk and height. Residences in the area are predominately one and two-story. The proposal is compatible in bulk and height with the neighborhood. (fl Current grading and erosion control methods. The proposal shall conform to the City's current grading and erosion control standards. (g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to -all of the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above and staff report. • 2 Application No. 03-254; 14289 Sobey Road Now, TxExEFOxE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the application, site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, Application No. 03-254 for Design Review Approval, as conditioned, is hereby found exempt from CEQA and in compliance with the required findings set forth above, and based thereon is granted subject to the following conditions: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A" date stamped March 29, 2006, incorporated by reference. All changes to the approved plans must be submitted in writing with plans showing the changes and are subject to the Community Development Director's approval. 2. The project shall utilize materials illustrated on a materials board date stamped March 29, 2006. The following shall be required and/or included as to the plans submitted to the Building Division for the building plan check review process: a. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans incorporating this Resolution and the arborist reports dated November 28, 2003, July 21, 2005, February 17, 2006, and March 20, 2006„ as a separate plan page. b. The following note shall be included: "A maximum of one wood-burning fireplace is permitted and it shall be equipped with a gas starter. All other fireplaces shall be gas burning." c. The following note shall be included verifying building setback: "Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the Licensed Land Surveyor of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per approved plans." 4. A storm water retention plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval indicating how all storm water will be retained on-site, and incorporating the New Development and Construction -Best Management Practices. If all storm water cannot be retained on-site due to topographic, soils or other constraints, an explanatory note shall be provided on the plan. • Application No. 03-254; 14289 Sobey Road 5. Landscape plan shall be designed with efficient imgation to reduce runoff, promote surface infiltration and minimize use of fertilizers and pesticides that can contribute to water pollution. 6. To the extent feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. 7. To the extent feasible, pest resistant landscaping plants shall be used throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. 8. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. 9. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. 10. Staff shall not approve downgrading to the exterior appearance of the approved residence. Downgrades may include, but are not limited to, garage doors, architectural detailing, stonework, columns, shutters, driveway materials, or similar items. Any exterior changes to approved plans resulting in a downgrade shall require filing an additional application and fees for review by the Planning Commission as a modification to approved plans. Any other exterior changes to the approved plans,. which are not deemed a downgrade by staff, shall require a Zoning Clearance issued by the Community Development Director with payment of appropriate fees. 11. All processing fees, in the form of deposit accounts on file with the community development department, shall be reconciled with a minimum $500.00 surplus balance at all times. In the event that the balance is less than $500.00, all staff work on the project shall cease until the balance is restored to a minimum $500.00. FIRE DISTRICT 12. Applicant shall comply with all Fire Department conditions. 4 Application No. 03-254; 14289 Sobey Road PUBLIC WORKS 13. Applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit for improvements in the Cityright-of- way prior to commencement of the work. ARBORIST REPORT 14. All recommendations in the arborist reports dated November 28, 2003, July 21, 2005, February 17, 2006, and March 20, 2006, and incorporated herein by this reference shall be followed and incorporated into the plans. 15. Prior to issuance of Building Permits the applicant shall obtain a tree bond, or similar funding mechanism; in the amount of $61,430.00. CITY ATTORNEY 16. Owner and Applicant agree to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court; challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. Section 2. A Building Permit must be issued and construction commenced within 36 months from the date of adoption of this Resolution or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15-90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. • 5 Application No. 03-254; 14289 Sobey Road PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 12th day of April 2006 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: , ABSTAIN: Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: John F. Livingstone, AICP Secretary, Planning Commission • This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date • 6 • • Attachment 2 • • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, Denise Kaspar ,being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the Ciry of Saratoga Planning Commission on the 24th day of March , 2006, that I deposited in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to- wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15-45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that -said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent ec{ualized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara (updated March 10, 2006) as being owners of property within S00 feet of the property described as: 397-03-004 -14289 Sobey Road; that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. < ~' ~y~ ~~ Denise Kaspar Advanced Listing Services • City of Saratoga Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 408-868-1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Saratoga's Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on: Wednesday, the 12th day of April 2006, at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall theater located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. The public hearing agenda item is stated below. Details of this item are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Please consult the City website at www.saratoga.ca.us regarding Friday office closures. APPLICATION/ADDRESS: 03-254 -14289 Sobey Road APPLICANT: Ho ~~ L J APN: 397-03-004 DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Design Review Approval to construct a new 5,298 sq. ft. two-story residence with a basement, an attached garage, and detached carport on a vacant lot. The maximum height of the proposed residence will not be higher than 26-feet. The gross lot size is 47,045 sq. ft. and the site is zoned R-1-40,000. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time `and place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a Public Hearing in court, you maybe limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing. In order for information to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed on or before 14-Mar-06, 2006. This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor's office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out-of date information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all residents potentially affected by a project. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Therese Schmidt Associate Planner • 408-868-1230 March 24, 2006 Ownership Listing pared for: X97-03-004 ~Teffrey M & Priscilla Ho 1.4289 Sobey Road Saratoga, CA 95070 397-01-034 397-01-035 397-01-036 Steven C & Diana Steps Zeljko & Ruza Sola Earl R & Rae Williams Or Curent Resident Or Curent Resident Or Curent Resident 14136 Arcadia Palms Dr 14114 Arcadia Palms Dr 14092 Arcadia Palms Dr Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 397-01-037 397-02-102 397-03-002 Samuel C & Paula Ballon Thomas A Carine Mikhail & Lana Portnoy Or Curent Resident Or Curent Resident Or Curent Resident 4070 Arcadia Palms Dr 14187 Sobey Meadows Ct 14141 Sobey Rd "~ratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 P~` 397-03-004 397-03-005 :a97-03-003 Jeffrey M & Priscilla Ho Thinh Tran Lucille G Giammona Or Curent Resident Or Curent Resident 15600 N Ray Rd 12790 Woodmont Dr 14341 Sobey Rd Lodi CA 95242 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 ~ 03-019 397-03-021 397-03-022 Russell T & Harriet Donovan Timothy J & Karen Sparks David Y Chao Or Curent Resident Or Curent Resident Or Curent Resident 14275 Hilltop Way 14133 Sobey Rd 14137 Sobey Rd Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 397-03-023 397-03-024 397-03-029 Douglas G & Pamela Fairbaim Jimmy A & Nancy Sutton Donald V & Karen Organ nr Curent Resident Or Curent Resident Or Curent Resident !4253 Hilltop Way 14231 Hilltop Way 18843 Ten Acres Rd y~ratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 '~7-03-038 397-03-039 397-03-051 .r'oel R & Paulette Spaunburg David & Lee Reed Sigrist Trust Or Curent Resident Or Curent Resident 18850 Ten Acres Rd 18860 Ten Acres Rd 18801 Ten Acres Rd Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 397-03-056 397-03-057 397-03-058 John R & Phyllis Feemster Ashjay 2005 Russell T & Maureen Schneider Or Curent Resident Or Curent Resident Or Curent Resident 18800 Ten Acres Rd 14403 Sobey Rd 14425 Sobey Rd Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 03-060 397-03-061 397-03-080 N & Eileen Heringer Ian & Julie Crayford Frank Suen .. r Curent Resident Or Curent Resident Or Curent Resident 8803 Hilltop Way 18807 Hilltop Way 18840 Ten Acres Rd aratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 ~.97-03-081 397-OS-042 David H & Jennifer Pitzen ~.marjit S Walia Or Curent Resident 1.078 Cross Springs Ct 14416 Old Wood Rd San Jose CA 95120 Saratoga CA 95070 397-OS-051 397-OS-052 Hossein & Nazanin Shenasa Gemma Falcocchia Or Curent Resident Or Curent Resident 14233 Old Wood Rd 14275 Old Wood Rd Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 397-OS-054 397-OS-055 Vito A & Bettyjane Dimucci 4 Quarters Inv Co Or Curent Resident Or Curent Resident 14343 Old Wood Rd 14377 Old Wood Rd Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 97-OS-057 397-05-058 ~.~bert H & Shirley Donzelli Walter E Donovan -zr Curent Resident Or Curent Resident ~~268 Sobey Rd 14226 Sobey Rd Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 397-OS-060 City of Saratoga Shashi B & Manju Sakhuja Attn: Therese Schmidt Or Curent Resident 13777 Fruitvale Ave 18692 Sobey Rd Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 397-OS-043 Robert- & Michelle Blake Or Curent Resident 14394 Old Wood Rd Saratoga CA 95070 397-OS-053 Saiid & Mahnaz Shahabi Or Curent Resident 14307 Old Wood Rd Saratoga CA 95070 397-OS-056 Nelson L & Mary Walker Or Curent Resident 14415 Old Wood Rd Saratoga CA 95070 397-OS-059 Jordan R & Tammy Silver Or Curent Resident 14138 Sobey Rd Saratoga CA 95070 • ~_J • Attachment 3 • • • • Neighbor Notification Template for Development Applications Date: I 2 PROJECT ADDRESS: I ~1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ;-~~~ Applicant Name:~~~i~ ~~~ ~I Application Number:_ ~ P~ (.'' 3 -' ~ SLt- The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to-the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Staff and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this doct:ment is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. C]'~ xMy signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which -need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion ~~ with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Neighbor Name: 1 ''l1 U~ + ~~~f 7u~ ~N .%f , _ ~r ~ `~ ~~ ~~ ,:. :~ p p~ Neighbor Address: -~ ., . . ~,.~ , , ~-- 9~ ~ _ Neighbor Phone #: ~ ~~ ~~- Signature: Printed: City of Saratoga Planning Department _. _ Neighbor Notification Template for Development Applications Date: ~ - S - Z~ ~6 PROJECT ADDRESS:_ ~428R ~0 at-y P..oA~ S~~q Applicant Name:_ J &1'FR.~v/ ~ PR is c, ! l a -~p Application Number: b~ ~ U3 - .Z~ ~- The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Staff and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the Cit/y of Saratoga. /'K L / My signature below certifies the folio ' wing: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the pmject plans; I ~~ understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following. (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Neighbor Name: _ .ll Av ~ ~ 2~z ~ M r Ui~[c~ L a F Neighbor Address: 18 Bo I Tt~ A~~ RD . . - S~R~T~ GA ~ Neighbor Phone #: y~g g6 g ! 9d 1 `'~c . Si afore: Printed: - .~ ~ r~ v ~) 2t~~ ~~~ _, ~~ :~ , City of Saratoga Planning Department - Neighbor Notification Template for Development Applications Date: ~ ~ r O PROJECT ADDRESS: ~~~~~ SD P ~ ~.{q~D SI-I~l~l4 Applicant Name: ~~ ~' ~P.a S ~-1~ Application Number: ~ ~' ~~ 3 _ ~-~ ~~ The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Sta,,~`'and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may leave directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this docccment is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any concerns or issaes which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project pleas; I understand the scope of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): - `. ; ~,; :~ Neighbor Name: ~ ~1,,t~ f ~~ r ~~ ;r~ ~/ Neighbor Address: lgga3 ~jl/~ ~~~ y c.~ -`' i n hf~. ~ ~ f`~C_. ~-;,: . `" ~~ ~'t1 ~~ ~ Neighbor Phone #: ~/D~ ~~ 1- l 9 ~~ Signature: Printed: :.,! %~ ~: .. ~,. ~; ~~ ~~ • • City of Saratoga Planning Department • • Attachment 4 r~ u • u r1 ~~ • Community Development Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, California 95070 14289 Sobey Road ARBORIST REPORT APN 397-03-004 Owner: Ho Introduction Application #: 03-254 March 20, 2006 Prepared by Kate Bear ISA Certified Arborist WE 2250A A revised set of plans was submitted March 10, 2006 to the Department of Community Development for review. Two previous arborist reports by David Babby dated July 21, 2005 and November 28, 2003 were reviewed for this project. They determined that the proposed project exposes 24 trees regulated by City Ordinance to development impacts and the bond for the project is $61,430. Many of the changes required in the previous reviews have been incorporated into the revised plan set. Below are listed remaining items that must be included prior to approval. Conditions of Approval 1. The retaining wall at oak tree #2 must be of pier and beam construction on top of grade and no closer than ten feet from the tree. A detail showing construction of this wall is required. 2. Details showing the construction of the driveway around trees #21 and #23 are required. Both must be constructed of pervious material entirely on top of grade. -Base material must have a percolation rate of 3/4 inch per hour. No excavation is allowed in the construction of this driveway. 3. No grade changes may occur within the drip line of any tree on site. 4. Locations for utilities, irrigation, or any item that requires trenching must be shown on the plans for review of impact to trees. 5. A final landscape design must be reviewed for impacts to trees. 6. A plan sheet showing tree protective fencing is required. That sheet shall also. include arborist reports in their entirety. 7. All protective measures from previous reports for this project shall be followed. Design Requirements 1. Any new underground utilities must be installed outside the canopy of all retained trees. Page 1 of 2 14289 Sobey -Road 2. No underground trenching for utilities, drainage or irrigation lines shall occur beneath the canopy • of any tree. Irrigation shall not spray any tree trunk. 3. The entire arborist reports dated July 21, 2005 and February 17, 2006 shall be incorporated into the set of final building,-plans and be titled Sheet T-1 (Tree Protective Instructions). Additionally the Site Plan shall show the location of protective fencing as identified on the map in that report. 4. Plant material under trees should be limited to no more than 20% of the area under the canopy. Plant material under oaks must be drought tolerant and compatible -with oaks. Contact the California Oak Foundation (www.californiaoaks.org) for a list of suitable plant material. 5. Stones, mulch or other landscape features should be at least one foot from the trunks of retained trees and not be in contact with the trunks of the new trees. • • Page 2 of 2 • • 4 °f- sAR9~ • V~~ x O~ \~~~jFOR~s~ Community Development Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CaliFomia 95070 14289 Sobey Road ARBORIST REPORT APN 397-03-004 Owner: Ho Introduction Application #: 03-254 Februazy 17, 2006 Prepazed by Kate Bear ISA Certified Arborist WE 2250A The proposed project exposes 24 trees regulated by City Ordinance to development impacts. They include seven blue gum eucalyptus (#3-#9), thirteen coast live oaks (#1, 2, 10-16, 19, 20, 23 and 24), two valley oaks (#17, 21), one apple (#22), and one Monterey pine (#18). Arborist reports dated July 21, 2005 and November 28, 2003 were reviewed for this project. The Saratoga Municipal-Code was revised prior to the second report in 2005 and required additional trees to be surveyed and assessed. On January 23, 2006, a revised set of architectural plans was submitted to the -City for review. Plans reviewed for this report include Sheets A1.2 (by Louie Leu Architect, Inc.), C0 (by Giuliana and Kull, Inc.), C1 and C2 (by Westfall Engineers). Tree locations and specific data for each tree are in the July 21, 2005 report prepazed by David Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist #399. I3ndings The plans show grading within required minimum of 10 feet of oak tree #2 (Babby, November 28, 2003), and a retaining wall within the required minimum setback of 12 feet from the tree (Babby, July 21, 2005). It is not clear from these plans if the retaining wall and driveway aze of pier and beam construction on top of grade, which is required per the 2003 report. Details-showing construction of the retaining wall are missing from the plan set and must be included. ~~~i ~~- ~~Tree #12 (subsequently renumbered #21 in the July 21, 2005 report) was recommended for retention or relocation. The current plans do not show its relocation and the current design is expected to significantly N" ~ 6 act the tree; causing serious damage during construction. If the tree is to remain in this location, -the ~;~' ~v~~~se ign must be altered so that no grade changes occur within the drip line. This can be accomplished by ~emovtng the pavers from within the drip line of the tree, back to a distance of at least 9 feet from-the trunk. Trees #19 and #20 are significantly impacted by the proposed design. The plans show grading to occur within only a few feet of the trunk of tree #19. Tree #20 is in conflict with the new construction, but is not shown on the design as to be removed or relocated. The 2005 report states that both trees should be retained and the plans redesigned, and that if this is not possible, they maybe relocated on site and shown Page 1 of 2 ~.~ ~ • on the plans as relocated. To minimize grade changes within the drip lines. of the trees canopies, the pool and spa could be moved to the south by 8 feet, and the flagstone could be moved to the east by 5 feet. Tree #13 (subsequently renumbered #23) shows grading within the drip line of the canopy. 'The current design shows interlocking pavers with a border (concrete?) within the required 12 foot setback. This tree will suffer significant damage from construction of the driveway and the installation of pavers as it is currently shown and is not likely to survive. Given that almost the entire root zone of the tree will be impacted, I recommend redesigning the drive so that it does not completely encircle the tree. One major cause of decline in oaks is soil compaction, which can occur with vehicles driving over the root system, even if the pavers are installed on top of grade. , The plans do not show locations for utilities, irrigation, or any other trenching that maybe necessary. Utility locations and trenching must be shown on the plans. All recommendations and protective measures from previous reports -for this project shall be followed. Additional Design Guidelines 1: Any new underground utilities should be installed outside the canopy of any retained trees: 2. Underground utility design should be reviewed for tree impacts. No irrigation lines should be installed beneath the canopy of any oak tree. Irrigation should not spray any tree trunk. • . 3. The entire atborist report dated July 21, 2005 and the findings from this report shall be incorporated into the set of final building plans and be titled Sheet T-1 (Tree Protective Instructions). Additionally the Site Plan should show the location of protective fencing as identified on the map in that report. 4. Plant material under trees should be limited to no more. than 20% of the area under the canopy. Plant material under oaks must be drought tolerant and compatible with oaks. Contact the California Oak Foundation (www.cal~orniaoaks.orF) for a list of suitable plant material. 5. Trenching for irrigation, lighting, or drainage should be designed beyond the trees' canopies. If irrigation lines or electrical lines for lighting are designed inside this distance, the trenches should be in a radial direction to the trunks and be established no closer than 5 times the diameter of the nearest trunk; if this is not possible, the lines can be placed on top of existing soil grade and covered with wood chips or other mulch. 6. Stones, mulch or other landscape features should be at least one foot from the trunks of retained trees and not be in contact with the trunks of the new trees. • Page 2 of 2 • R~R RESOURCES ~ A Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care A TREE IlWENTORY AND REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED RESIDENCE AT 14289 SOBEY ROAD SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA OWNER'S NAME: HO APPLICATION #: 03-254 APN: 397-03-004 JUL 2 5 2005 CITY OF SARATOGA '~+ti1t1NITY DEVELOPMENT Submitted to: Community Development Department . City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 Prepared by: • David L. Babby, RCA Registered Consulting Arborist #399 Certified Arborist #WE-4001A July 21, 2005 P.O. Box 25295, San Mateo, California 94402 • Email: arborresources@comcast.net Phone: 650.654.3351 • Fax: 650.240.0777 • Licensed Contractor #796763 David L. Babby, Registered~onsultingArborist • July 21, 2005 - INTRODUCTION The City of Saratoga Community Development Department has requested I review the potential tree impacts associated with developing a proposed single-family residence on a vacant lot at 14289 Sobey Road, Saratoga. This report presents my findings and recommendations. A previous report, dated 1.1/28/03, was prepazed by me in connection with a similaz project design being proposed. At that time, there were 14 trees of Ordinance-size at risk of being damaged. Since then, the Tree Ordinance was revised and subsequently requires an additional 10 trees to be included and modifies the methodology for determining the tree appraisal amounts and tree protection bond amount. Plans reviewed for this report include Sheets 1 and 2 (by James Reed Stroupe, Architect, dated 5/17/05) and Sheets 12 thru 15 (by Robin Atherton, Landscape Design, not dated). The trees' locations, numbers and canopy perimeters aze shown on an attached copy of Sheet 1 (Plot Plan). Specific data compiled for each tree is presented on the attached table.l For identification purposes, round metal tags containing numbers that correspond to those shown on the attached plan were attached to the trunks of each accessible tree. FINDINGS The proposed project exposes 24 trees regulated by City Ordinance to development impacts. They include seven Blue Gum Eucalyptus (#3-9); thirteen Coast Live Oaks (#1, 2, 10-16, 19, 20, 23, 24); two Valley Oaks (#17, 21); one Apple (#22); and 1 Monterey Pine (# 18). Trees #10, 12, 18 and 24 are not shown on the project plans and must be added. Their approximate locations are presented on the attached map and should not be construed as being surveyed. Trees aze not shown on the proposed Grading and Drainage Plan and must also be added to allow for an accurate assessment of the potential tree impacts. Trees #1, 10, 11, 18 and 24 are located on adjacent properties. They were inventoried for this report as their root zones and/or canopies aze at risk of damage during development. Based on the proposed location of the retaining. wall neaz tree #2, I expect soil cuts will encroach within 8 feet of its trunk. To minimize root loss, I recommend the portion of wail northeast and southwest of its trunk is established at least 12 to 15 feet away. The portion of wall southeast of its trunk (i.e. along the proposed drive) could remain as proposed. 1 # 17 18 21 23 and 24 for this Please note trees #10-14 from the mrtial report are respecrively assigned as , report. Ho Property; 14289 Sobey Road Saratoga Page 1 of 5 City of Saratoga Community Development Department David L. Babby, RegisteredL'orrsultingArborist • July 21, 2005 The proposed underground utility design must be revised to avoid adversely impacting the row of Eucalyptus (#3-9) along Sobey Road. To achieve this, any trench required within 30 feet of their trunks should be designed along the north side of the driveway. The proposed grading design also requires revision to achieve the survival of trees inventoried for this report. In doing so, I recommend grading only occurs outside the designated fenced areas shown on the attached map. In addition, the grading limits presented on Sheet 2 must be revised. In the event that grading absolutely cannot be revised to achieve the survival of trees #19 and 20, their relocation might be a feasible option given the relatively small size and healthy condition. Recommendations are presented in the next section to minimize or .avoid the anticipated damage to trees. They should be carefully followed and incorporated into construction plans. The bond amount required for adhering to the recommendations presented in this report is determined to be $61,430? RECOMII~NDATIONS -The recommendations presented below are based on the proposed plans and are subject to change upon the plans being revised. Design Guidelines 1. The trunk locations and canopy dimensions of each tree presented in this report shall be shown on Sheets 1, 2 and 12-15. I also recommend the trees' numbers are presented and the circles identifying the trunks reflect the trunk diameters. Please note tree #7 encompasses the three, easternmost trunks between #7 and 8. 2. The proposed grading design must be revised so no soil cuts or fill occur within the designated fenced areas shown on the attached map. The grading limits presented on Sheet 2 must also be revised. 3. Trees #19 and 20 should be retained and plans. revised accordingly to promote their survival. If this is not feasible, their relocation appears to be a suitable option and shall be qualified and performed by a professional tree company. All measures recommended by the company regarding care before, during and following transplant must be followed and shall include the installation of an irrigation system to supply water to the root zone area by means of soaker hoses or other practical device. 4. The underground utility design should be revised so trenches within 30 feet from the trunks of trees #3 thru 9 are established along the north -side of the driveway. I recommend the specific trench locations are shown on the plot plan. z This value represents the combined value of each inventoried tree and is calculated in accordance with the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9'~ Edition, published by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), 2000. Ho Property; 14289 Sobey Road Saratoga ~ Page 2 of 5 City of Saratoga Community Development Department David L. Bab , Re istered~onsulting Arborist • July 21, 2005 by g 5. The proposed retaining wall near tree #2 should be revised so the portion northeast and southwest of its trunk is established at least 12 to 15 feet from its trunk. Great care shall be taken to avoid excavating beyond 12 inches from inside the wall. 6. The eight-inch Oak shown on the plans to be immediately northeast of tree #12 was not seen on site and should be removed from the plans. 7. The catch basin proposed beneath tree #3's canopy should be redesigned to be outside from beneath. the trees' canopies. 8. The location of protective fencing that is presented on the attached map should be identified on Sheet 1. 9. Temporary or permanent drainage features, including downspouts, must be designed so water is not discharged beneath the Oak canopies or near the hunks of other retained trees. 10. Any walkways proposed beneath the trees' canopies, such as beneath #12 and 17, should be established entirely on top of existing soil grade with no soil cuts or trenching (including edging). 11. The following additional recommendations should be incorporated into the proposed landscape design: a. The same concept of no irrigation lines or plant material beneath the Oaks should be applied beneath those Oaks not yet shown on the plans but presented in this report. b. A four-inch layer of decorative, coarse wood chips should placed beneath the Oak canopies and incorporated into the landscape design. c. The irrigation line proposed parallel to the property boundary beneath the trunks of trees #3 thru 9 should be eliminated from the design or placed on the soil surface. d. Irrigation should not spray beneath the Oak canopies or within five -feet from the trunks of all other trees. e. Any trenching for lighting should be in a radial direction to the. trunks and established no closer than five times the diameter of the. nearest trunk; if this not be possible, the line(s) can be placed on top of existing -soil grade and covered with wood chips or other mulch. f. Tilling beneath the canopies must be avoided, including for weed control.. g. Bender board or other edging material proposed beneath the trees' canopies should be established on top of existing soil grade. Protection Measures during Site Development 12. Tree protective fencing shall be installed precisely as shown on the attached map and established prior to any grading, surface scraping, construction or heavy equipment arriving on site. It shall be comprised of six-foot high chain link mounted on eight-foot tall, two-inch diameter galvanized posts, driven 24 inches into. the ground and spaced Ho Property; 14289 Sobey Road Saratoga Page 3 of S City of Saratoga Community Development Department • David L. Babby, Registered consulting Arborist July 21, 2005 no more than 10 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and ' be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. 13. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the designated fenced areas (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: grading, surface scraping, trenching, equipment cleaning; stockpiling and dumping materials (including soil fill), and equipmentJvehicle operation and parking. 14. Development activity shall not occur on adjacent lots; fencing may be necessary to restrict access. 15. Prior to grading commencing, Irecommend afour-inch layer of coarse wood chips is manually spread within the fenced areas beneath the canopies of the Oaks and Eucalyptus. The chips should not be placed against the trees' trunks. 16. Great care should be taken to avoid excavating beyond five feet from the future basement wall near tree #22. 17. Any tree pruning must be performed under supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist (not by construction personnel) and according to -ISA standards. Information regarding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained at http://www. isa-arbor. com. 18. Throughout construction during the dry months of April thru October, supplemental water should be provided every few weeks to each retained situated near development activities. I suggest an application rate of 10 gallons of water per inch of trunk diameter is supplied to the soil areas beneath the trees' canopies by deep-root injection or using low-pressure (water should not be sprayed or applied on the trees' trunks). 19. The disposal of harmful products (such as chemicals, oil and gasoline) is prohibited beneath canopies or anywhere on site -that allows drainage beneath canopies. In addition, fuel should not be stored nor shall any refueling or maintenance of equipment occur within 100 feet of the trees' trunks (unless on the street). 20. Herbicides should not be applied beneath the canopies of retained trees. Where used on site, they must be labeled for safe use near trees. 21. Prior to grading, the limits of grading should be staked on site and reviewed with the grading contractor. Requirements for required tree clearances should also be reviewed. 22. Any approved activity beneath the trees' canopies (such as grading for the driveway) shall be manually performed. The wrought-iron and other perimeter fencing proposed within fenced areas must also be manually installed. 23. Any roots encountered during approved grading or trenching activities that require severance should be cleanly cut on the tree side of the cut area and immediately Ho Property; 14289 Sobey Road Saratoga Page 4 of S City of Saratoga Community Development Department David L. Babby, Registeredtonsulting Arborist • July 21, 2005 covered with soil. The freshly cut ends of roots with diameters of two inches and greater should either be wrapped with a cleaz, plastic sandwich bag and. tightly sealed with a rubber band. During trenching, roots encountered with diameters of two inches and greater should remain intact and be tunneled beneath, as well as wrapped with burlap that should be kept continually moist and in place until the trench is backfilled. 24. The root collars (defined by a distinct swelling at the base of trunks) of trees # 1 and 2 should be cleazed to minimise the risk of infection by various root rotting diseases. The procedure must be performed by either a tree company or landscape contractor familiaz with the process. Damage to the trunk must not occur during digging. Attachments: Tree Inventory Table Site Map (copy of Sheet 1) • ~~ ~~ Ho Property; 14289 Sobey Road, Saratoga Page S of S City of Saratoga Community Development Department _ ~ ARB RESOURCES ~; Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care TREE INVENTORY TABLE ~ ...~ ~ ,.. 3 ,-. ~3 a 3 v ao ~ o ~ ~ ~ 6 ~w .~. a~ ~ ;~ a,~ ~ ~ ~~ b o o `" o~ ~' ~ ~~ ~' ~ .~ o P3 Q c ,~ ~ r/~ W CQ U Coast Live Oak 2 (Quencus agrifolia) 15 15 25 100% 75~o High High 2 - $5,500 Blue Gum 3 (Fuca tus globules) 29 70 60 100% 50% Gaod Moderate 2 - $1,120 Blue Gum 4 (Fuca tus globules) 12 50 30 100`/0 50'/o Good Moderate 3 - $200 Blue Gum S (Fuca tus globules) 23.5 65 60 100% 50% Good Moderate 2 - $740 Blue Gum 6 Fuca tus lobules 14 85 35 100'/0 509'o Good Moderate 4 - $300 Blue Gum 22,18, (Fuca tits globules) 11 90 50 100% 25% Fair Low 4 - $830 Blue Gum 8 (Fuca tus lobules) 22 90 50 100% 50% Good .Moderate 3 - $650 Blue Gum 9 (Fuca tus globules) 26.5 90 55 100% 25% Fair Low 3 - $750 Coast Live Oak 10 ( agri olio 12 20 30 100% 75% Good High 3 - $3,160 X X Coast Live Oak 11 (Quercus agri olio) 5.5, 4 15 20 - 100'/0 25% Fair Moderate 3 - $590 X Coast Live Oak 2 (Qeenctts agrifolia) 7 20 15 100% 75% Good High 1 - $950 X Coast Live Oak 13 agri olio) 7 20 15 100'/0 75% Good High 3 - $1,220 REE NAME : ~' ° _ ' ~ ' ~ u v F o 0 NO. T F. , U v~ p Coast Live Oak 14.5, 1 (Quer+cus agrijolia 12, 10.5 20 40 75Yo 50% Fair High 4 - $7,800 X Coast Live Oak 14 ( r+erts agri olio) 8 15 15 100% 75% Good 4 - $950 lob: 1~2d9 Sobel Roo$ Smdog• PnepmrAby: DsrrdL Bobby, RCA o yi~nrf 'errs _ y c ar-24iv~~ ~' w 0Y1'~1'1.~IWR M1•I.hIVI! .y~y.~~Y~ ~~ PROTECTIVE FENCING : "•~,;;,t a• rl Vii/ .x ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ PROTECTIVE FEN G ~/ .•+, • ' r e : ~ ~ / r•J ~ ~ / / .j B ~ / °"'"` ~, 4' , ,~~ ,..~..~ ~ ~ Y~O,I•EC'I'I CI1VG ~ ~ ~rrr 1 ~ . i ~ ~ . , +~ / 3 ' i / 1'~ .. ~ i G,..,.A~~n) / ''-/ r~. i ~ d ~ / : 4d e.,.~ re eo~ss ne rP ' .~ - ~ ~ ~ \ : - ~ l1 / .... `. ..1. '. S! rj -~~~~~'7• '. ~~u~na1«ti'"~`an.rws --- P I ' / i .- % / / / ~ / 15 : / ' :13' ~ x 11 ~ ~r9 .. r,r„s,r.•nr•,.w,.v ~~ •lg: ~ wee-.~~ '~ / . rawecrccscw~nuN DRP: IIJCo INDEX • . ; "~ ARB RESOURCES ~40 fasslonaL P~4~Ot~eStiL~l4taL C~O-LbLLL~~IZ9 ~l ~tEE G~a'CE A TREE INVENTORY AND REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED RESIDENCE AT 14289 SOBEY ROAD SARATOGA, CALIFO1tNIA OWNER'S NAME: HO APPLICATION #: 03-254 APN: 397-03-004 Submitted to: Communi Develo went Department tY P City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 Prepared by: David L. Babby, RCA Registered Consulting Arborist #399 Certified Arborist #WE-4001A • November 28, 2003 P.O. Box 25295, San Mateo, California 94402 • .Email: arborresources~a earthlink.net Phone: 650.654.3351 • .Fax: 650.654.3352 • Licensed Contractor #796763 David L. Bobby, Registered Consulting Arborist November 28, 2003 a. SUMMARY The proposed project exposes 14 trees regulated by City Ordinance to potential damage or removal. One relatively small Oak tree (# 12) is proposed for removal. Mitigation includes relocating this tree to an alternate location on site. ' The proposed grading must be revised to promote the survival and longevity of trees #1, 2 and 13. Setbacks for grading and equipment are 10 feet, 20 feet and 12 feet, respectively. I also suggest the portion of utility trenches within 30 feet of tree trunks- #3 and 5 is redesigned along the driveway's north side. A bond amount of $17,223 is recommended for compliance to these recommendations. INTRODUCTION The City of Saratoga Community Development Department has requested I review the . potential tree impacts associated with developing a proposed single-family residence on a • vacant lot at 14289 Sobey Road, Saratoga. This report presents my findings; provides mitigation for trees being removed or damaged; identifies each tree's .condition, species, size and suitability for preservation; and presents tree appraisal values. Data compiled -for each inventoried tree is presented on the table attached to this report. The trees' locations, numbers and canopy perimeters, as well as the recommended tree protection fencing locations are shown on an attached copy of the Plot Plan (dated November 12, 2003 by Quintessential Forms, Moraga, CA). For identification purposes, round metal tags containing numbers that correspond to those shown on the attached plan were attached to the trunks of trees #1-10, 12 and 13. Note trees #11 and 14 were not shown on the Plot Plan. Their locations were added and should not be construed as being professionally surveyed.. FINDINGS The proposed project exposes 14 trees regulated by City Ordinance to development impacts. They include 7 Blue Gum Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus), 4 Coast Live Oaks (Quercus agrifolia), 2 Valley Oaks (Quercus lobata) and 1 Monterey Pine (Pines radiata). Ho Property; _14289 Sobey Road Saratoga Page I .of 4 David L. Bobby, Registered Consulting Arborist November 28, 2003 A~ Trees #1, 11 and 14 are located- on adjacent properties. They were included in the inventory as their root zones and canopies are at risk of damage from development activities. Tree #12, a Valley Oak with opine-inch trunk diameter at 54 inches above grade, is proposed for removal to accommodate constructing the proposed driveway. Based on its exceptional cgndition, I suggest the tree is relocated to an alternate location on site. Tree #2 is .expected to be severely damaged from the proposed grading design for the driveway. To achieve a high assurance of this tree's survival, the plans should be revised . to show no grading within 10 feet of the tree's trunk. Should a retaining wall be used to achieve this, I recommend the wall be of a pier and beam design with no excavation between the piers. Tree #13 is also expected to be adversely affected from grading activities. I suggest no ~' grading is planned within 12 feet of the trunk. There is a row of seven Eucalyptus (trees #3 thru 9) located algng Sobey Road near the _ -property's--south-_-end~ .'Trees .#3 _ and--~--will §ustam-the greatest. roof damage m constructing the proposed driveway and trenching for utilities. To min;mi~e the impacts, I suggest the portion of utility .trenches within 30 feet of their trunks is planned, along the driveway's north side. RECOMN~NDATIONS All recommendations presented below are intended to mitigate foreseeable damage from implementing the project as proposed. Modifications to the plans reviewed may necessitate their revision. 1. Tree protection fencing must be installed prior to any demolition, surface scraping, clearing, grading or heavy equipment arriving on site. It shall be located as shown on the attached plan and be comprised of five- to six-foot high chain link mounted on two- inch diameter steel posts, driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 12 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. 2. All construction activities must be conducted outside fenced areas shown on the attached plan (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: grading, .surface scraping, clearing/grubbing, trenching, .storage and dumping of materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 3. Should access on the neighboring northern property be required, fencing shall be established along tree #14's outer canopy. Ho Property; .14289 Sobey. Road Saratoga Page 2 of 4 ('ih, of Saratoga Community Developmera Department David L. Bab , Re ' terecl Consulting Arborist • November 28, 2003 by gas 4. Revisions to grading for the driveway are suggested to promote the survival and longevity of trees #1, 2 and 13. No grading (meaning both soil fill and excavation) or equipment use shall occur within 20 feet from tree #1's trunk, 10 feet from tree #2's trunk and 12 feet from tree #13's trunk. 5. Retaining walls proposed beneath tree canopies must be comprised of a pier and beam design with no soil excavation to occur between piers. All fill behind the walls must be fully porous and contain no granite fines. 6. Unless otherwise approved, no grading or trenching shall occur beneath the actual, on- site tree canopies (their widths are shown on the attached table). 7. 'From March thru September, supplemental water must be supplied to trees #1, 2 and 13 every two weeks. The suggested application rate is 10-gallons per inch of trunk diameter applied by soaker hoses placed on the existing soil surface beneath mid- to outer-canopies. 8. The disposal of harmful products (such as chemicals, oil and gasoline) is prohibited beneath canopies or anywhere _ on site_ which allows drainage beneath _ canopies. Herbicides and pesticides used beneath hadscape must be labeled for safe use near trees. 9. All pruning must be performed under supervision of an International Society of • Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and according to standards established by the ISA. Information regarding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained by referring to the following website: http: //www. isa-arbor. co»~/crrborists/arbsearch. html. 10. Prior to pruning, the limits of grading should be staked on site and reviewed with the grading contractor. Requirements for required tree clearances should also be reviewed. 11. The pruning of tree #2 must be limited to achieving the minimal driveway clearance. Cuts shall be smaller than 2-1/z inches in diameter and no more than 10- to 15- percent of the total canopy shall be removed. 12. The wrought-iron and other perimeter fencing proposed within fenced areas must be installed manually. 13. The root collars (defined by a distinct swelling at the base of trunks) of trees #1 and 2 must be cleared to minimize the risk of infection by various root rot diseases. The procedure must be performed by either a tree company or landscape contractor familiar with the process. Damage to the trunk must not occur during digging. 14. The utility trenches proposed along the driveway's south side should be redesigned to be no closer than 30 feet from the trunks of trees #3 and 5, and 15 feet from tree #2's trunk. Ho Property; 14289 Sobey Road Saratoga Page 3 of 4 !';fv ~f .GaatnQa Community Development Department .• ~ • + David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist November 28, 2003 15: Stones, mulch or other landscape features must be placed no closer than one-foot from the base of trunks. 16. Irrigation shall not be dug beneath tree canopies. irrigation beneath canopies must be comprised of a drip type system and shall not spray beneath Oak canopies. 17. Lawn must not be installed beneath Oak canopies. Plant material must be of low water use and comprise no more than 20-percent of the dripline. A publication of compatible plants can be obtained from the California Oak Foundation at 510/763-0282, or a-mail: oakstaff@californiaoaks. org. 18. Bender board shall not be installed nor should rototilling occur within-the fenced areas shown on the attached plan. 19. All pathways,. patios and other landscape features proposed beneath canopies must be established on existing grade without grading cuts or root cutting. __- __._-._.20.x'-ree_#12 should_be__relocated_xo._somewhene__Else ~n.sitesather_than c~ doK+n._..The work shall be performed by a professional tree company experienced with tree relocation. A permanent watering system of drip or soaker hoses shall be installed to promote its survival. All recommendations provided by the tree company for post- . transplant care must be carefully followed and include the installation of an irrigation system to supply .water to the root zone area by means of soaker hoses or other practical device. TREE PROTECTION BOND The combined value of inventoried trees is $35,750. To promote the protection of inventoried trees, I suggest a 100% bond for tree #12 ($3,800) and a 35% bond ($13,423) for all other trees. The appraised tree values are presented on the attached Tree Inventory Table. These values were calculated in accordance with the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9a' .Edition, International Society of Arboriculture, 2000. Attachments: Tree Inventory Table Copy of Plot Plan Ho Property,. 14289 Sobey Road Saratoga Page 4 oj4 r.~, nf.c~m~non !'nmrauriity Develonmertt Department ~~~, • - ~~~. ARBO~ RESOURCES ~ ~ ~ ~'LOfES3l0l2Q.L ~tDOtlG1LL~litQL G:.O-211LC~LlZq ~ JLG6 G-Q.tE TREE IlWENTORY TABLE • ,-. .~ 3 ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ p b ~ b o I a ~ ,~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ a 8 TREE ~, ~ ' ~ ~ a ~ ~ b ~ a ~~~ ~ Z5 ~ :~ ~ ~. a n ~~ Lg ~ Q ~ ~ :o^ _ NO. -TREE NAME ar ~ '-" . 1 Coast Live Oak (Quer+cus agrt olio 14.5 12/10.5 20 40 75oYo 509~o Fait 4 - 56,900 . ~~ Blue Gum 4 Eu lobules 12 - 50 30 100% 50•~o Good Low - 3 - 5200 ' , Blue Gum S Euc tus lobules 23.5 - 65 60 100% 50% .Good I:ow 2 - 5610 Blue Gum 6 (Eucalyptus globules 14 - 85 35 100% 50% CTood Low 4 - 5290 ~ Blue Gum Eeca tus lobules 22 18/11 90 50 100% 25% Fair Low 4 - 5290 Blue Gum 8 Euca !obelus 22 - 90 50 100oYo 50% Good Low 4 - S540 Montea+~y Pine 11 (Pimrs mdiata - 45 50 75% 100'/o Good 5 - 51,820 X X ~ Valley Oak ( antes lobota 9 - 35 25 100.0 1004/o Good High - X 53,E 13 Coast ~~ ~k (Quercus a ' olia 10.5 7.5 25 25 100% 50% Good High 3 - 54,010 ~ Coast Live Oak 14 (Quencus agrifolia) 25.5 - 35 45 100% 75% Good J~6: llld! Sriej lto~ Soho P-,~e~I~: Gib oJ~d+ ' Deva~°P°>cut Dc~a 4 ~ - ~ 514,800 ~ X~ X~ N.^s:s 2R. Sef3 Coast Live Oak I I I I I I I' ~ I l -' 55,200 ' 2 (Quencea agrifolia) 15 15 25 100°!0 75aNo 3 Blue Gmm Euca tus lobules 26.5 - 90 55 100% 25% Fair Lvw 4 - 5690 . ' ~ ~ ~ N° s~hl$ ~ wIN 6rrr /fif ~ Jr' ~~ ~ ~flf / ~ ~ Y```1 289 SobaYAad ~p ~ - p ~ ~ . ~ ~ H1~ ~``~1Z y ot8rrop Commmury Dewlapmenc Depct~um d6m It uen. - ~ ~ - ~--y..- ~ . ' /~ f / } / . \ ~ ZESOIIRCES ~ ~ ' ~ 'i ~-. s • c....my s ~.. e..• ~ ~ H o ~. rw.e,u w.n ~~ , 1. 1 i ~ . ;i . e.L.m i .1~ ~ /. «.r ~ .. i b„~ /~ ~ --. ~ i ~ Rria~'r % i ! i ~ i i ~ ../ ~ i v• ~ .i ~ i/ L .-~~~ ~ / ~ ~ ; ~ r , . _.~.. l~.s ~ isx • Ef1lFY• K~r a6, 4>J ~.yE . L~.NDscs~iN~ Not~S N ~i fia~~ ' .: .. .. ... v~ro.~crnt'sc~ _Pr2oH ; _; . ¢fHpYe oh~wel ~o .galeeNf Mfn~~rL ~~ n ;' ~~ ~~ i~RP•IJir.~.- INDEX • r~ u • • • Attachment 5 • • r~ • DESIGN REVIEW Date: January 26, 2006 PROJECT ADDRESS: 14289 SOBEY RD., SARATOGA APPLICATION #: 03-254 Applicant Name: Jeffrey 8z Priscilla Ho The following is a written description of the major changes to the design of this home for submittal to the planning department: 1. The house has been relocated off the top of the hill approximately 25 ft. towards Sobey Road to reduce the impact to our rear neighbors. The house now sits on the forward slope of the property. 2. The house has been reduced in size and bulk. 3. The house has been moved south to accommodate the two oak trees on the north side of the property. 4. The redesign has lowered home to increase the privacy of the neighbors to the rear of the property. We acted on the prompting of the Planning • Commission Members suggestions to increase privacy to the back neighbors. (See video of May 12, 2004) 5. The master bedroom observation deck above the master bedroom porch has been removed. 6. The spiral stairway to the observation deck has been removed. 7. The staircase from the master bedroom balcony to the back yard has been removed. 8. The landscape plan screens the rear of the building from our neighbors behind us. 9. Tree screening is included in the landscape plans to the satisfaction of our neighbors. 10. All concerned neighbors have signed their unconditional approval for our redesigned proposed project. • DESIGN REVIEW Date: January 26, 2006 PROJECT ADDRESS: 14289 SOBEY RD., SARATOGA APPLICATION #: 03-254 Applicant Name: Jeffrey 8z Priscilla Ho The following is a written description of the how the redesigned proposed building structure for submittal to the planning department meets the design review guidelines. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW POLICY #1: MINIMIZE PERCEPTION OF BULK 1. Changes to the natural topography of the above lot are minimized. 2. Unnecessary grading is avoided in this plan. 3. The perception of bulk is minimized by designing the house to follow the natural contours of the lot. (re: contour lines as related to proposed building) 4. Natural materials and colors are use to reduce the bulk. Elevations are softened by the harmonious combination of different natural materials designed to create horizontal proportions. (re: material board and architectural rendering) 5. Architectural features are used in a pleasing pattern creating horizontal proportions. (re: architectural rendering) 6. The proposed building has been moved 25 feet toward .the downward sloping front part of the lot fronting Sobey Rd., increasing privacy to the rear neighbors and lowered the .height of the house as viewed by all surrounding neighbors. 7. Areas of maximum height are minimized by increasing the. ratio of square footage of the first floor in relation to the second floor thereby reducing the higher portions of the structure; ensuring areas of higher portions of the structure are set back. 8. All upper floor roofs are hipped. 9. The heights of the roof elements are varied through changes in height and form. • • • 2 10. Proposed building is articulated with a pleasing assortment of windows (including bay windows), chimneys, arches, varying heights, interesting spatial relationships, vertical and horizontal elements, and other design features. 11. No attic spaces. 12. No large under floor areas and exposed foundations. 13. The structure was designed to fit in with the existing neighbofiood. It is in scale visually and structurally with the neighboring residences and in its own natural setting in terms of proportion, size and mass and height. (re: architectural rendering) POLICY #2: INTEGRATE STRUCTURES WITH THE ENVIRONMENT 1. Natural earth-tone colors and materials that blend the. structure with the natural environment. 2. Harmonious use of carefully selected limited number of compatible materials and colors designed to blend and integrate the proposed building with the neighborhood and site. 3. Designed to be aesthetically pleasin architectural) to the nei hborhood 9 Y 9 to preserve and add value to the neighborhood. 4. ,Preservation of almost all trees and existing vegetation. 5. Proposed building designed to integrate well into the site and in the neighborhood while respecting the natural surroundings. 6. All structures united with the single design concept of California Tuscan. These elements of style blend easily with the neighborhood. 7. Roof materials blend with the natural environment. POLICY #3: AVOID INTERFERENCE WITH PRIVACY 1. Proposed building has been redesigned to respect the privacy of the surrounding neighbors. 2. Minimized all windows on close facing neighboring property. Building • designed with minimal windows and views toward the closest neighbor. 3 3. Upper floor balconies are toward large yard area and Sobey Road. • 4. Proposed building is angled to optimize privacy of all neighbors. 5. Window, balcony, views, and door locations are all facing toward the long distance view away from neighbors' windows and the structure itself is angled to enhance and add privacy. 6. Proposed building is we1J inside setbacks on all sides. (i.e. Increased setbacks for all parts of proposed building) 7. On the south side, the second-story is setback is an additional 18 feet further in from the first-story setback. 8. Landscape integrates evergreen trees to provide year-round screening and privacy for neighbors. (Screening evergreens are to be planted staggered to appear as naturally placed as possible.) 9. Increased setbacks naturally increase the noise buffer zone. POLICY #4: PRESERVE VIEWS AND ACCESS TO VIEWS 1. Relocated proposed building forward and down toward Sobey Road off • the top of the hill approximately 25-30 ft. and lowering the elevation, minimizing the impact and protecting the view from the major living areas of all neighbors. The house now sits closer to Sobey Rd. on the forward slope of the property. 2. The house has been reduced in size and bulk. 3. Neighbor's privacy is further protected by proper site planning and appropriate landscape, taking into consideration of the neighbors' input and preferences on types, and location of screening trees. 4. The original proposed building on tap of the lot to enjoy the view. The new proposed building site has lost the view but we are hopefully that there will be some other view from the second story in this newly proposed location. 5. The proposed building provides privacy to the neighbors. 6. The new location of the proposed building is located on a lower portion of the lot. The lowered elevation of the proposed building reduces the perceived overall height of the building. • 4 r~ Attachment 6 • • • • J v W x: O ~ J <~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ t CO < <: O O ` O N - ~ N ~ Q7 :y] V,[ - ~. ~ ~~ : Q ~~ . ' ~ t' ~ «~, ~ , ~ , , t c1 # ~ ~ a {~ y~H d @ Q r ~,~ O ~ v ~ S,W j ~ V < G $ ~ ~ p ¢ ¢ w ;~o ~ W~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~~ 2~ ' ~ ~ u SP alt 5 J ~ ~ 9 - ~ ~ SL a ~ =~ . ~a r ,~ rv.,/,~r ti ~ ~ x. y ~ ~ ;v f~ S 9 ~ R~ ~~ t1,~! 5~ +~~~ ~ ~'S~4'~~ tZ r ~ ~n ~ ~ ~r ~{ a ~~ ~; „~ a t~{5 ~r ° ~~ iad O i i o n ~ fi~~ v, tr ~ '~ ~~ ~,, W ~ iy+ r ~l y pY ~t 1 e y~~F c ¢ ~ W ~ ~~ ~~`_ ~~ A_ ~ .%T . ~ a„G ~ ~ f M ~Y+,~ 1. o `• -i O -. Vl S~~ 4~ s .. 3U ~ ~~ . Y CV ~fN x P :ti: r -~ ~ ,f ~ n `~ {`~4~' ~' 1 :' :tom ~ ` ~~ ,~ Ef ~. P, JrK C Cc-~- Je 1'p ~. ~r ~ ` .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . -.~ ' i~~l - a ~fi ~ ~ ~..T...., ~~ 3 ~ L ~~ ~ is f I~{' . _ _ z n`-ry--~ry ~ _ `~ :af ~di; . .. 't. S i:' I s- ~ ~ ~~~: ~~~~- jr} 4 n ~ ~`~ -; 4 1 y ~ 13 J- ! .s. v; ~~ ~- Q ~. ,~ t :; Y- ~ 4f U~ r :~ , .. r, ~ ~' , - _ -=~ ~ r ~~~ S.i . ~ ~: i ~+.,~ N J; f ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ z ~ f ~~. r ° ~~~, ~ ~ ' j \L H ~Y ~ ~~ ~- -~.. ~ ~~ ~ ~.~~. ~_ ~. V` t f ' 4 ; +R'i i F -~c~n L w z $g ~ /3 ~ L' ~' x O ~ ~ a g W x ~. ~, !+ O ~ ~ ~~ to ~ Q oo az~ Z F g o,wy » g~ W U ~ CJ $~ O W W = .Z 7 w -~.~a~rn~z Q¢ v~U ~g~LLOwO ~~~ ~ 22 w °-~ w0°yr=wau- p ~~uu t a ,.A~ ~i ~~dv~-~aJ~~a-iuwi~~~ O~~ . -.~ wl' k" Vi O ~ N M ~- N M N - N J~ r f11 N N f7 s' q N . ~~ QQ <CQQ~Q~Q¢~_~ U' JGSLS ;'_ ~p x~ H r? L C7 L?~.."€ ~. ~~E~ W $~{t,$ 5 §P ~ - o g °~ T bb s~6 L$ cn b°.~,aSX o ~~L£~ o ~`~~~ ~~ ~ ~ $~,~_ ~ (~ z y"- ~ E~ zg 6~gYa o ~ S~r~3 C7 a z a J~ a z EE€°, ~~i~ o] ~ i~ ~ ~~EoE a ~ i~ zz s ~ ~ 9°~~~ Q~ os sa z 5-~ Z ~ z o~~~ a as~~~ ~aE~ar W W -. _ _ - :~ ~ Z o z W= w o ~a a m~ ~ ~ a 3 `< $ ~ ~ ~ V~ w ~ w; g~ ~ a w o d ~ z ~ OI°~ ~ ~~ c~ o ~~ ~S ~ ~ ~ w rcg V' g I `z ~ d m° u ~ ~ ~ g. u S` ~ ~O - ~ ~ ~I w Z o Z z ~ ~' ~' rr ~ J m og V 3 ~ O ` ~ y~ O ~ W ~ ~ ~ TTT». C ~e~ ,~e~ g We A z ~~ mx~ 3°~~ ~~ ~ i~ li li~ w ~~~~. 0 a E ~ F°- ~ o s $ ~ ° ° _ 9 E~ € Aga x ~ 8 ° 2 ~~fr 3y f `~ ~~ O oe °O ~ U O~ - J_ ~.t F F ~` y a- ~°$ ~ m a u Ho O..O Vp` e U o ~ ~ E~~ ~ E °o k ~$eg'= 8 °g g~6 c~ymok$~ O 3 uu-So ~ oZ't~'cb8oo~ ~~r ~o~H o_~ o ~~' ~ c gr 3 a o 0 0 om n- yy ~8c €, ~ ~~. ~a3 fis~as ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $__z~ff ~a ~ a°- ~ ~`s-- ono s s~ ~~- z~ ~° £~ JJJJ a~g ~~~g~2f zzzzz 000000 o_aa Wo. a°a~6aa a ko:rcrc~rc~rco°rcrcrco: m~i ~hN NNN-NNN NNN~ANNNN NN~ rti~tir ~~~~~~~ »> » 33333.333 dd C1 0 i 9 ~a~ ~k ¢p ;yyry{ ~ ~ 44 g g a:p}t~~o~ydo~ W ry g'tty ~3r ~i f <~F~~~a~ gg4~ u~~l~4~i3¢¢ L~ g~{ ti -Q 11-- ~ ~]s~~ ~7f~~i~~~i$~~aS~ i~~3~Y o~00~~5 iC~e:~3~$~~u~'.i ~n d c+~ia~&~c~c ~'ad~d m~~~~m E~~f iim~~a~x~-amuoma~uo Frf~rr FrrrrF 25~~ ~5 333333a.~3 H ~ W _ ~ ~ ~ e E ~ ~ ~ cep t ~ ~.~°~ ~ EdE. s ~ g' ~ ~ ° ~!f °' ~~$ o. g' gk `i°°-Eu `o `o `o$ a~ m 7Se~ _ ~~ o.p Y~.E v'~.g g ~ ~b~--Pan .`~ §~e -r oE5 E a~.g'g °[. -ao W-vx~ c~ees:J'~~'g'C ~ ~ ~$ -~~_ °s~fi ~- F £ QV aVCCCp~ 8~~a'$ ~ 0~~°-44 ka 3~8Yo ooe~osog~ ~5 ~jaS`efi [~6Ee o ~ WW~e&b.~g8~osxg~ i $58 ''-4sg~@a888E388E~ B ~}p5[(y[}p. ~3`0 00'$' F~€ .~ 6QQVS6IW <~«<~4 aA dm~mm UUUUUUAUV~~UU~U UUU~ SCCOS~C00.~~ W-WWWWtl1WW WWWWW IL ILLL ~IL ILLLLLIL R. ILLLWLLLLILLLLL~W ~~A ~(!V'~D V' xYxxxx 1 Y C • '~ ~ y ~1N ~ ~.~ ~~~~ r g Y ~ S8 ~~a~~~~~°~~~°~.~ ~9~~~aES.ii~~'~ ~44~.Io~j~~JRoo~~~~~~ ~~a~~.~~ 4~~5~`~~O t e~ow~.,~$ ~~~~ ~~ ~ a~~8 3c~t'it'3t'~~d~~~~~ ~~~~3o coo e e e~ Waiu~u-4WWYY 'S'aS n_~a. i~W c n.c` s. .mm mo. xi~xxxxx 9 FS ~--ri a 0 ~:I ~Q ,• ~• •"~i 13~ ~.', ~`4 x ~~~ 4i ~. 1u. -:: f , ' r r Y~ }t? ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~g ~.. ~ ,r J ~ W~ ~ ~ U ~g^ k ~ ~ ~ s stia $~~ ~i ~ , O . g ~ •~ ~ ~I ^~ Ig io o _~ ~ ~. - ~ ... R ' C~ C~ C t C C t C C C C~ =~ C~ C G C~ t C ~ ~. ~ ~ ~. S 5t ~ 9 ~ ~ $ 5~ . ~ ~ 5~ SS 5T 5t $ S ~ ~ S $~ ~ ~ 5 S $ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ SS .~ ~, ~ ' S~ F F ~y G ~ ~ r~ ~ff ~ ~Q H. ~ N r ~ N. n N a ~ tnp . [r < _ - ~.vv c •^ 'g fQ ' O Y ~f1 a n ~ O. ~f :~ ~fOO - < m r n~ ~: <- N ~ t~~i Oaf N N h ~!f ^ ~ ~pp ~ P ~y O f0 W ~4y ~ ~ y y t7- ai S ~. ~ .. N - v~' - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - • O r d H ~ d x ~ • _'° Q a ~ x - ~ y ~ ~ < . Lr U r j r ~ a • • r , W ~ m n N + 1 i x x m N N t w ~ C1 ~ O ~ O x X \ lv N '` •I •' 3 ; ~ x r '~ N •~ ~ ~ ~ C'i ~ a ~ x x ~~~; ~ ~ x x o ~ ~ ' ' x ~ ~ x v ~~ < O ~ P Q D x -n x++ x d x N x m a ~ W~ ~ ~ • ~ • - _ '~ m ~ - x + x o ~ - ~ o ~ -~ ~ P7 pW~ 8~8 ~ ~ ~ W x ac < ~ ~ w r o ~n o • i i " x o ~ W ~ • x '' ~ a ~ oG - c ~ X N ~ ~ I • 0. ~ U o_ < 3 p: ~ U ~ " & ~. n n n e ~ ~ m ~ N ! o c ~ - -- ~ n n n m . z m~"~'o& ~ s _ 'a ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~., r' - .--, Q it `-_--- ,~~_ -- ~~ re .~. a a ~ a 0 o. a w a ~I~ C~ _ _~ ,. • 3f 1 i z a a a 0 0 a w a w w a x w 3~ o. ~„~ e ~~ f~~~~ r s ~ 8 ~ < ~J i O J S~ ~ _ W 4i - > ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'. ~ a $ ~ ~~ o 9 ~ ~ ~~1t Std qygy ~§ o s ~, .. , \,;~ ,` \ ~~., ~ ~\ ~ ~~, .,ter ~\\1,1`~` ..` _ ~` ~. Z ~, H Z Z W (9 g ''~ `• ~ 4rr \ g '~ ~ O W ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ qy~JJ ~~ ., ~ ',.,~ \ r 4 ~\~ \ a ~ ~ 1N ~ m ~ a ~ ~ ~s ~~ W s ~ ~ ~ ~ ,_ ~ ~ \ ~~~ ~ ~S ~ ~ 1 ~ U...\ i ' 'r 1 / / / ~ \ 4 \ / / / _ 2 e jai yG tGyCGCKyC 3~i~SSS9F~45Sl~SI " C ~ SS ;r\ / ~ c~ i O ffe 4 g ~ ~ ~~ % I i,.r~. ~-' / 4 ~ ` ` ~~ ~~ ~ ~ N ~~ x B hl g ' %' ~~ ~ `m ~ ~' ~ W ~ ~ m V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ o ~ `„~ ~` ~ %~ ~ ,:, ppgg d Y g~W>gx~ ~~ 3 / / \~ /'~ ~ %~ '(~~ i i ~ ;~~4 1 ~.. .f ~~ ~ i Y':.A l ir• • 3ir• + ~~ . ® 11 /` U 4 ~ ~~ G e ~l / ~~ ~® ~ I~,~. 1 . lI ~i Z ~ JI~ ~s 44 , ~ y ~ ~- i r 1 ~ ~ WiI s ^ ;~, cni ®~` w ~\ ~\ ~ ' ~ 4 \\ 3 \ \ `rya 4' ° \ \ \ -. lb men $ a~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~¢bj~ b~s ~a~ \\ ~s `~\~ j rye Z$ '~ t y$93~ \ ,~ QS 5t s • i ~ . - ~ e ~ ~s ~\ )tea( \~ ~~\'ti r~ ~\ >, /r •\ ~~ \_ i -=<.,. ~~ ~ ~ -- . .~---~ ~ •;~ 1 r'r---. '~, . \_ I F \ ~ I~ ~ ~` _ \. . ail `~! - Q ;~c~~~ ; i ~ -1, _, w ;~ a .~~ j,~ ~ ~~.azr` '; ~ ` ~„ ~ ~ r~ ti f a •, 4 R o~3 ~ 4 ,~ ~Y:I ~:. , ~.~ " .. ; 1` 1 L ,'1 `~ ,K` .~ ~ / ,. v ~ f --.. ~ ~ gg ~ 'i ~~, , `8 ~ i '~', Jf i .r ~- PZO p ... ~~ ~ J ~ I a o ~ n ,~i ~ W O < ~'~~" ~ .r~ y n W ` I ~o `'` ~ r. ~ ~i 1 Q ~~ ~' \~. r~~ /~ \,\ ` Q Ci PC i ..~( O ~\ ~J~BQlyaeb' ~ \!r d' a~~,~ ~\ \ \_ ~ `s,,~ ~,~y~ ~~ ~ h r5 a Y • • z ° ~ A w xa ~~ ~~_ g.~ rH e ~~ o ~~ ~~~ ~ .3 a ~. •,~~;\~ C7. \ ..;\ ~~0. ~~` ~~ ~~ '~~ ~_ f,,~4, 5"r 6I J co w K 4.. ~~~~ ~~~°~. . • \ ~ggqgT 3 F ~ ~ . CC CCGCCCCC~ C C RSt~51~9~85t515R Sf ~ ~ _~~Rq~e~~~~~ ~ '~ Z ~ O H U 3 J ~ }~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~d~ p ~ n ~ _k § rs E O ~ ~~~ ~'~ ~ $~ w -~ \~ SZ~ ~ \- ~ ~~ ~,, >~ - ~,.. - - .- a za ~~ a~z ~,z~ a~a ~ M oi o ~' r ~ a o e ~ Z 6' Z . ~ ~ a ~ ~~ z d ~~ - ~-~~ 8~ ~., S - _ ~~ \ `~~ - ~,- - ~~ -,. ~\ 3~ .. ~ -. ~~ ~,~.. -` :c ~ ~` moo,-~,,~ ~ ~_ s '} _ ` ~f '~ :... .`mac ~..,~ r ; - :~ ~r e, - r. z .: ~ _ ,.z ~ ,. ~~` :___ z rr ~8. ~ ~ I -\ \e- { ~ ~ . ._ i - ~ , x `I u ' r. ~ ~ ~ +' (~ I •\ ry, i 1 ~ \ 1~ ~ mi _ ~ p ~ > N ~` . ~ i~~ _ d m Y' o W I ~ \ O~4 Il ~ ~ ~hh ~'' ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~' rib '~ / ~ ~"/-~ - ~ ~ - _ Fri i '~ .t I w .__ _ 1 _ r , t -~ - ~ _ W ~ -. ': ~, ) f` ( ~ ~ ~ 4 i V1a' ,,. ~~ ~ s [.~' F 1 ~ D ~S '~ `a I~s i °Q's '~ IN i:: ~~ ~ ~u _~- <'\ '~pU~~-`~-'.- \1F~X~~.~' ~o\eI-\~~._. _'-- Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o a ~ 8 ~ ~ ~--_.--~ R3 ~ W I ~ ~ r "' 4 y'n r '~ ~`, ~ ~ OC i M k ~ f i s~ N 'p ~ ~ - 2\~Y X Y ~ ~ ~ w `a z ~ ~ ` ~ & b - ,\ ~n, a • . & - ~` ., yW ~` >. 'YC it ] 1 I l~ ~r - ~ tit ---u,\ - a~`~ ~ to ~ }i:~ ! l~ q ~' d j u s }~ ~ ~ ~ ~lr ~ 1 ..\ "tS '~ ~ ~ ~ ,.I ~ Wit' ~ ,•I ~I ~~g f `t~ i ~~ c~1 w ~' ~ \ s-. ~~ aLC :\ , , ~ 6 l w~ ,Y~ ,- ~- 1 m i 1 i ~-~~ < ~~ 1'~ I --- I ~ ~~~ "fib z ~~ - i ~ _ _ Qtr `- 1_ 1 ,~ \ ~ \ \ `\ __ _-~j~ 4 I \-- I _ ~ - ~~ - \ ~~ `-~1 ~ tc ,. .- ' - k. ' .. ~~ . ~ -.. _ __ql c v~~ orr '-~ .o. _ \ `\ ~NaQl~~ DJr'~ r ~; ~ i ' °'r. _ :~ ~i da i I ,i - - _ - '. y • • z ~ w ~ a ca ~ ~ F H ~ x a ~~ is lL ,,: :J - v W W 1= s ~. ~~ ~~~LL~ ~... R j * b/H~o ~ ~ # ~ - ~ ~ ~J ~ ~~ s~o $ +3~. $ ~ ~ ~ ~ z. > 1~ 3~/1~ 5`4 ~ ~qy ~§ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ , a ~~ ~ . ~_. ~ Wy~ 1 U• I v H . ~ I ~ I ~: r ,9- 22 ,B-,OZ . c N .~0-.C .[I-.01 I .[E-t ~ I t6-.Z ~ 1 ! I I ~~ ~a ;' ~,\1 ~ [+] m ,o I II~ / I I i ~~ 0 I i I ~_ -------- o --- ---- - - - -__ w ~ I\\, ~ s ~; i I : I o ~ II -- -- -- -- \ I ,_ I \\ --_ I I-; I ~~`_ i ~: ------------------~ ~ I ; _._ _-- - - - ; ~ - . I I~~ I I ~ ~ IL _"-'-- ' I ' I W ~ -'--- ' \ / I I~I_ I - J I ~ ~ u ~! I _ ~ o I _ .__._' ~ - I _ ._~ _ ... -' 1~ I I I I d __ ... C I I \ __ -.~ 1. _-I I I I - I' \\X i II I " _' _ - _ _ __ _. I~ I - ~ I n ~ I %%% / .~~ ~ I _.__. •o- I i ~ I ~ \\ I I~ i I n 8 ~~ I i ' \ I 1 ~ . __- 1lLJ I i I\\ ~. I _ / I L ' ~ I I ______ _.._~ II I ,~ 1 it __~~__. .~ ~~• y` I I ~ ~ `~7 ~O I I I I i ti I y~ ' _'~ -"-- `- ~ I I ~ ' __- _ I 'I ,_, __ I y `~.~-_._ ___ i ~~ ~ I~ ~ _ _ ~ I _ __ _ _, 8 ° ~ .f=.t.'. i I I I' _.__________._a~ _~ ' I.. I \ I I : I. I it I I ~~-, ,__ ~I i I: z '~ 1 I ~ i j iii/, ' I pp I ' ~ ~ I I ~ i 6 - I `~ y TII i i _.. I t~.l I I Z .J-.._.. _L.- - I I ~ _ -1.~ ~ 1 _. I G I I ~_ i. - r-I.. i, I I I I~ U I. I ~ I ~ ~' I ---------J ~' -_~.. [~ ------------- ------- - -==--J I ~~ I Z I I ,o-.a i < n 1 .9-.C •J<~ b I .o Q N \ ~ G i .~ $ g x U s ~ ~~ I+ ~ ~~. z a a a a a w .s.~. w~ z~ ~~ 31 ~I z a a j°" a w x o w a • • • I z $~ - A ~~ I.a ~z a a a w a X O.g. x .a w ~~ `~ ~ ¢~~ r ~ v y O. C.. _ .J ` O v~ Z, J i i k ~ a W ~ ~_ ~ g ~. dd q~~ O t ~ ~ qs ~$-R _ _ ~ Y f _ y~' o ~ w ~ L A _ y I~ °x a ~~ . w z~I W ..1 ..t a i s {j] 4' a` ~ a ~ ~ k. \~' '~ c G : I ,, ,. .{.-.~r ,I-,[l /~ ' O I / I ~y' _, ~ m ~ b .__ ^ S i1 ~~_U_J H ~ ,~ i O ; - - --, ~ i ,_ , ~ _ '_ ~ ~ -- - •• i i ... ;_ - 1. -_~.. m i. I I a __ _ .. y ~----' I -. __ I -~ -- i I I I ____ O _ r ~ ~ - O O I ~ - _._~, i _ _ ._ . -.. _ ~__~ IL _- __- --~\__ - ._ -__I - I _ ~~ ~. ,__ _. { ~__ ~ I _ is - ~ - _ __;_ I ;_ ___L_ __ __ _ __ _____~ , GC J ~._, -~ r _ r--_ r---~ '-' ,. ~ ~ ~~ - -_--F ______________l / ~ ~ I I ~ I -I ,_, }~z~+. . . i ____________L r F'_____________ •_ ; ~ I 1 D ------------r - I ' ,. i I ,' •. L_ Zt~ f l f •._~ I ___ . ~ I i ' 3d0'IS _ ______________________~ I ' ---------- -------- i ~ ~ Ii ~~ i ~ I I I ii I ~ ~: I , .s-~ ' ~ , ~i yp i I 4li ~ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~! i I ~- W 3dOl~~ ~ _ Si ~' ' S i g ¢ ~ o; a ~ b a I III ~ ~ ~ - ~ I ~ i i I {LYc ~~ I ~ ---------------- ~ _ ~._ __, . I ~ -----------------~--------------------'---_ ~ ~ I a i N oI N I ~ ~~ o ~ a xi s ~ S ~~ z a a W W .~ W a a ~~~ <~~ ~~~~~ ~. ~:' ~~ . ~,,~Gt • bFti -. <W ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ =~o ._~ '~ Y ~ - a j w ~~ w ~~ _ o m, ~' ' I - '.0-.02 / / \ \ o o_ aw\ ~ TRU: o. _ ~ i NORTH ~~ i~ i i m ;i ~ i ~ a b ~ b ~' ~ ~ c ~ 1Ly ', ~ a ~~" b -- m ,,Q. a O -- ~ = - -- - - - -- ~ _ ----~ - - -. - - - - - - a-z ' .or-z_ ,2-,1 ~ :o-s - .z-.1 .m-z - a-z - _' - - - :o-.oz ',' 1 11 it , 1 1 _ 1 c3 ~i 1 ,y{•. 1 .~. i _ Y- , ~. , - ~ i it 11~ [__ 1. - -' YI. ~ ~ J: 1 1 1~ 1 .. ~ - ~~~ .o ' ~ . _~.. _ _, , } _ 1 - I - ~ _-~ i g .: .w ~ • • I i _ ~: _ - _ ~~ ,1, -~: a=-~ ~. ~• -.j -y~. ~ i ~~ 3Nn NJrBl3S i z 0 ~' H ~i ~~ ~~ ~ d ' ~~ _' ~ w ~ ~; a S' i ° ! b w J I ~I I 3Nn ua3aoad T _ .~ . ~ ~~ ~~ ~ _ • _I w' z p ~ W .~ A ~~ h .'t~ xlyi ~~ z... ~z 0 SQ4 0 Y ~. S i I ~ o R ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,^ ~ i = g 8 II ;~ 5.. ~ lO ~ ~ W~l iv s ~8 ~ ~ I s g ~~ ~ U - ~ § ~ ~ g w ~~ gq W ~ _ ~ F~ ~~ ~ 9 l w ~~ ~ i m ~ ~ $ ~2 ~ N I F. ~~ I 1 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~` °• ' i gG ~! ml ~ ' i ~~ g ....~, ~j 3Nn ua3aoad _. ti .-. 1 - __ ~ J 3Nn M~tl9t35 ."'~-~. ~ ~~ bi _~ - I I ' I ~ 1 i ~~ i i ! ig i~ i~ ~O 1 ~ . rsr ~~ ~ ~ a $ it i Ii i z ,.~~ _: o _ , ;~, ~ ~ ~' o a ~~ ~i ~ W I ' .0 b ~ ' Q~ ; w I M °i~ , N r ° o ' ~ tl ~ „ I o ~ r ~' n ~f z I ~ ,,~ ,® ~ I Z ®® ~ i O ~'~ H ,_ ~ `L,~g W ~~ ~ ~ -~ _ ~ ~1~ w ~i ~' '° ~ ~~ ~~ x ~ ` ~' ~ ~g I. ~ ''1 0 ~, N! z ~ ~ ~ ~, ~~ ~' a~ w .~i G I WI V~ +i ' 3 ' i a W ~ x H - o z a 8 3 3 • ~~~ ~~~. 6 ~..g ' . Y ' A ' lF'GT f b~ ~ ~~ G ~ J p ~ ~ 0 z ~~ Ia Q -~ - y..' ~. ~'.. ~. ~ a ~ g` z 0 y F . ~Lny {F r..~ I~ ~,,~ ~,\i id \loi o ~~ a ~~~;~ ~ ~ .: ...- ,. .. a ~ 1~ 1 ~.~ ~i ~Y= v~:,. M ~s x s,~ ' ~ {;, . a~N _~~ ~ I . ~. _. - i 1 1 vS ` . ~;~ `i' n I ' gg uS 4 L 4 T - 3N11 A1CidOtld _ --_ ..... 6 1 3 4 y'~ ~j i-: I L?y S .~y. ~ ~~ Ls ~. a ~ I :rr{ '~'` ~-, //~~ 1+11 I >G ~R"~' . ~ ~ ~- r~ ~~ z ~ ; 4 . . Z' ~. ~ ~G O _ I I - _ &~ SSSb , , z~;Ya, O ~- - ~ ~~~ t ^ I ~ I ~ b ~ U •~'~w ~I I U ~ . ! .C ~ Vf I I I kkEL___ ~ F~ ~ P ,I g ; ~ ~ I - I bi ~~ ~ I ~ O S y~$ 63 ~~ ~, "' ' ~~ ~ 6 1 I ~ a ~ I ~I i l i _ I ! - I1. - I - `~~ 18 ~~ ! I ~ K ~ :I ~ ~ ~'. 'I fA ~~Z?..J'Y'`' 8 y~yI sj~ y ..i ji~ S:i o ~f~~~vGYtiY': ~'~. , =~ ZZ2 'i I ~.I ~; I mi~ odf ~ d gg bH aY~iAg b~ . , .. ~ ~, I + 1 ,J ~2 I i 1 I t II ' i ~ ~ ~ I .I I I v 1111 i t l nvll. l -~ ~ ~ E _. I '_ ~ __ , - 6 I `,. .'~. I 1 I ~ ti i I I _._._...~ i I NL rr Qf ~ I ~ i ~ ' f ~I L I . . I `-, , - y i` ~/ 1 y~ ~ ~ S p F !1 / Q - _______. ______..._.__ I N 1 ~ ~ i rv h I I y<* _ k. c e _ _ __.___.-- it y ~ ~~ ~ ; ~; - (8 ~ 1 I 8 I~ ~ b ~ ~ ( ~ ~ II E :,' ~ x 1 ~I ~~ 1 §i~1 §~ 1 r b~C ulx by 1 b~ ol~ ~I J i ~ ~~ i` , _ ~ ~ 1 1 I I ~ I ~ ' IIII I I II II '1 i ~ i f 1 I f I 1 11 II I I I ~ ~t2 I ~ I I I II ~ I I I I ~ ~ . I . \ ,~N;; M . I I I ~ 'A O ~' ~ I ~ II ~ I ~~~ el _~~~v~ ~'~ - _ b iC ~ /~~~ \ ' c 1 I ~ a.l - I I ~ j ____ - 1 I -- -- - y. `,1 ' -~' I ~ ~ II ~ " I~ ~ h1 ` I ~, ~_..__ _ .1: r ~ ~;; , _ _, ,, ~, \-~G s ^~ ~~ L it `,f \ ~ -I i /' _ - ~I• i I I 1 II _ II - _ _ - r .~ • • g J ~~ b ~ ~~ 'lF'~t M y> ~ ~ Segeqg ~ "" ~ O J ~ v ~ ~~k ~1 a g7 ~2 ~ ~ I I W ~ I si~~ ~~ ~ ` ~ ~ p ~ J~7i stt - ~ ~~- g - - ~ - - C-~~ y ~. / `. ~ ~ `< ~ /1~/ply 1 ~ /r i I 2 I G I I I C.; .~/~.._ I I I ~ I / I I ~ ~I 1 I I I I ~I (`, - I$ I I rl I z ~.~i~~i i -_ I W ~ ~ I L I ry I ~I I iVd U~ ~ I -~I __~ 1 I It7 ~ I~ I I I i I ~ I ~I~ -_ --I- I -___-- I y~ '~ I l i €I I II ~m 1 I ~ ~ ~ I ~__ f; ~ ~I '~ - I ~_ ~ ~` I s I ::. ~ \,: 7 _ ~^ / r. I ~~~ . I I I I m Y ~\yT~/~\/ `~v _ ~r inn `~ I I Q ~ I s ~ ~~ /~- I I '1 ` ` i pp i I 1 ~``~/ / / - Y; F I I t ` ~ I Q i 1 1 II 1 /fC i ~ ~a C i ~ I '~ r j ij~ JS`` i ICI Ilii -~-; I - -~"~ _ -- - -- - ~~ - - i r It I l i 1 i III ?~S"y I I ~ 1~ I I I I11 I I I I I I L ?/ ~ _____-_____ i I I ~1 1 1 i ~ 1 < 1 ~ II If L ~ \ I ~ L \ I I ~-0 ~ I \ 1 1 yJ ••/.; I 1 ~ ~ ~ y~: = L _ i ~ 11 .0-.6 ~%\-~ I I 1 ~\ I I / I .J \/~./ I ~~/~ I i ~ I ~ ~ }}~~ ,~i S .\ zi v `~% -- it I f I ~'l ~ %y ~ <% ' ~ ~ ~0 1 /\/~ ~ < ' v `/ /v 1 ~ i - \~ .v // . ~ \// . / ~- / ' a ~ ; ~ \~ I .o•. ~~., ~. \\ ~•~ j.\ ~ i., /\~ 1 I ~~ ~~/'ti5~ , Cpl ; O. i~ O~ ' ,~ ~/' cl "; ~i ai ei ~~r~ ~~/. I ,,,, I \~~`j~; ~v- ~ r ~s ~`% I ;~~% I II ~~ I 11 ~ I 'I I 1 I I ~ • i (~ z o s~ v A ~~ '~.. xa s z O H N M. N b :\i ° I o i ~ , ~ 1 ~ it - ~ ~ .8.! - ~~ ~/ ~ ~ ~ i s/ r~, /. -l\s i v~~"i ids! `\i..: 1~ I /\ I $ i% ~. ~% $ - $ I ~, ~ I ~ a ; I ~I C U~ % ~ `~- S \ \ \ \ I \ ///\ ~ \/ //\ I ~ O I % ~ e S: ' ~ , ,,z l 0; i1 ~I O °li I 6 ~I \ I O I I ~ /~~hK - ~ ~i I I I' I I .`~. / ~: Vl I _ I I i i ~ i ~ ~ i ' ~ ~ I I '/~~ I ~ v / ~ ~ ~' . ~ i \ ~ \`/y U \ ~ v \ ,\Yi' i /i \/ / ~/ ~ y^1 ' ` _ ,a-.e I ~ / ~~ ~ I i W ~~:~ IL I 2 ~ ~ ~ -i _ ~7~ ~ \ --~ i i I \ ^ / i \ / __ ~` I ~ %v,` ;; , ~, ~, f: I -o-z ~ ~ /i / :4 ~N t i /</ l is \ \ / / y.\,,,; \;,\,,,,~y. `; / ., / , 1 ~ / iv' /\ ~i \ / i ~ ~~ ~,~~~ r ~~~~ / / y y '; `vim\nF~~~ ~ r I ~ ~~~\~/ ~ i \ \ 1 i ~~ir/ ~ ~~~ ~ i ~~ ~ 1 ~ \ ~^ ~ ~ ~I I. _ , 1\ '~~~!~~/ice %~\%' F ~ ,c x ~ , . ~ / / T/ / / <; ,i~% ~`~} ~i~ ~"~ jC cad ~i \\/~/t%~~ '/~~~C~ ~ ~~ _ ',y ~ ~ ' 1 !Z +Ci r 11 1 1 i 11 1 ~` 5 f • ~~~~ 9 ~ ~ ~~CT • bury ~ p ~ - ~ ~ Q SvJ V ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~i i~ V Q g~~ ~ ~ W ~~ ~ i °~~ ~n a. E ~) e s ~ ~ ~ 1~ y 9J/'" SAP ~ ~yy ~S gR - ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ O m ~~I . ~ - ~ _ _ - ~ ~ hi - of ~i ba' i ~ - ei 3i. ~ _~ ~~ e, s, ~~ o~ ~~ o~ z o~ N~ :o, o ~ _~ . a •W C ~~, 1 ° ~ =_=_ - ~~ i _==_-- -- ---_- = "__ _ __ ' I ', f ~_ - ~' _~ i ' I: ~ ~k I ~+~ ~ $ ~~ _` ~o ~; ~- -- ~ ~ '. ~_-.~ h. .~-..,._,,, ~i .,.. __ i : _~. _- - ~, I ~ , ~' ~~ 1 ~ ~ ~'. .. :. 1___ ~ ~~ j ~~ I 1 ~ ~ t 1 ~ ~~ ~11~: ~ .. J I ~ ~ ~ _1.'.I `~ ,, ' ~r~; - -`JI ~ i - :~ ~- - ~~ _ ~> ~ ~ ~~ _ ;~~, ~ ~ ~ > F, ~'~ l~ - ~ ~ --_~ . I,' ~, r -~ -~ 5=-.~ ~'----r r-` r '`s r ~, - -- ', ~ ~ " _~ ~ ' ? . i ~ ~~ , i ~ ~- ~k-~ - if' _ ,~. :•-; -~'I ~, p ! .i U 1 I ~. ~~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ +, i i' ,~. ' ~ ~ h :~ . I, , f ~ I i• ~~ i ~ ~ I~ ~ Z ~~ ~ 7( 1'~r ''~ W ~.~ ~ ' Z '~ 8 ~ ~ ~ { J __n ~' •; ,: I l ~ I I ' ~ ~ f .S I E-+ -~ a f ~, z ~i w ~, :; ;~ ~, ~~ ~ of u~ e. i of i f' i ~ it 2~ Z~ o~z~ ®~ ~ ~~ II . u~ ri u~ ~~ai ! of n o ! of ~`•'i i ~i • {i~ o z og W > 3 Q $~ x a ~~ s N - z 0 Y w. . I~ w, i ~y .ol ' ~ n \~ o ol o ~ ~ L ~ R . ~ $ Y _ $I I ~I _, ; ~,.- ~~~ ~. ~, 5 ~ ? 0 $ of °; . 1 I 1 I ;. '~ iff ~` ,'~' w W E"~ 0 z A ~ W' a ~I W ~, J W w ~ _ ~. c.v O oc 6 J ~~ ~ u m~ ~ b m ~~°~ x yeti Q ~ s o ' ~ y ) ~~ ¢~ ~J/ 7 * ~ 5ZP - $ ~ ~~ o , I~'%%': S i ~I. i ^i I ~I ~i Vi I ~ ~I I I I _ - ~, ~ ! ' I ~I ~i ~I ~I O. OI ~~ ` rcl N of `~ ~I n •I I ~I yi ~I~ I `ol of I I I I . . ti'®' I W''I ' +~ c i b+ r r. 1 1 (^ I ,~ i i I ,-, i ?~?' I Es NI ~S~ ~~ ~I S I ~! ~I I ~I hl ~I 1 1 I I I 1 III I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I I + ~. • t l._} I ~~ . i z '°. I i i.- -11 ..~...-. ~.-•-- f'_'I ~~: 11 _ :, -- z ! ~ -- o i `I, a ---- --- ,,.~_ w ;: ~_; I~,.. , , a ' I~ ~N_~-: H ;, ~. ~ ~~ , ~..~ w ~, ~--~ ~ ~- ;I~ t ~: ,~ d i;' ` ~~ ~. ~~ W ~ ~ s ~~~ '~ ,• • (i~ z o ~~ M1l M1 ~ VV ~ ~ °m a V' O ~ i VJ z FFo - a ~. ~ N ai g ~ H \I ~ ~ ~ ~: r u ~- ~ '-. S 8 ~- ~: _I ~~ I ~; ~I ~i ~ ~I vl I ~i I ~ ~I I si ~ xi `~i i of ~I ~I ~I 1 I 01 I OI I Oi rl ~~ ~I dl I I OI .~~ . I I-I ~lo _ r. i.+. ~I I i I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I- i I I i I I I I i I I~ i~ I o w I I w w H I 'w Vf w i A ~ I ~ A ~ ~ ;I xj yl I. I s a • ~$~~$~ A -. ~~GS * b'H b ~~ ~ ~ ~ _ ? v J . ~ ~ ~ 8-``~ . $= - ~ ~ 8 ~ a ~. v <~a $ a I _ u17 i n~_ O < ~ g - .. 3J/7« StP. ~- ~ ~5 - ~ ~. - .. --R bi~ r~l ~ ~\ ~ al s o cY, /i i i C^ / / /^ . ' ~ ~1 ~a~v _ . i `~_°~1 i / -/n` ~/ ~ g, .. z .,~~, , ' d a ~ ;' ~ w ~_ I G ~' ~ .~ ~ ~ f I \~` '~~ /~ I I - ~~` , ~ ~~ -__-__--_`t-~----_-T_-____ - ~.- ----- I ~dAl a001! a3ddn 0~3NI1 9NIQ7108 I i I 1 { I 1 _ ~ .n 8 ~1 I ~ 1 I I T I o~ ____ __ ~ ~ f ____ ___ I I 1 I %(. ____, 1 I~ I ~ I 1 z - ~__~ 4 1 _____-_ ~ - ______L___ I ~ eQ ~l~ ~ i i I _ 1~ I I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ I I I 1 + Iz ~ ~ I. 1 1 ,2~Q I I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 ^ ZI~ Y/1 Y I 1 j- I 1 a ~ ~ ~ I C~ ~M I tca to i i I 3d~E 3941a I ~ 'I I l i ~ I 3JOla I - j ' ~i ~ '~. ~, ~~i!L_______________ I ,t,Q ` ~ - `. \ 1 ~ ~ ~ I 1 \ S ~ s I I I I --,--;-- __ , gala 6 1 ~y \ ~_ ~ / ,. ~/` / -- w - _1____ ~ ~' --- -- // II T 1 __ T Z- , ~ I ~~ I 11 . 1-y__ ___________ -__-__---~ i~----f-- __ 11 ~-{._- / ~,' 1 ~~ 1 I I 1-J ~ 1 \ ~~ ~ ~^ I 1 I I zl a/:a tl:rta 1 zcala 1` tl:a la I . I 1 ~dOlS 3dO15 ~ ~ ?dOlS 3dO15 - ~ ~ . I , 1 1 1 I n I 1 I II N I I I I i I I i~ $ - I I I II ~r I I - ~- I I 2 ii 1 L_ Zl~ a l a ~ ~ 1 II C== _ ,. i 3dOlS ~ i i . ~ 17--11---------, ---------- I- 1 ~ I ii p~" I% I I ' I I - I h-r--------------- ~ --r---~-- =------ --- ~ 1 II i I I I I i 1 1 I _ I I I I i I I I I I I i I I ¢I I I I ' ~ ~I I I 3dO15 c`~i ?d0"IS ~ 1 I , ~ = s I I~ g'~ I JJi J. ~ :I 1 ~_ . ~ I al --------------1 - I --- - --, -~-----------------1------------------------ --..' I I I • • a ,; m p Pao O O ~ N _ jv 2 y O } U. J}~ ^ ~ O. - ~ - W .U M M I~ d .. U~~~~ ~ Q J ~ ~ \ r W W ~ = o o o r ~ Q W a z U H ~ '3 x ~ Qv'. z .J~ ¢ U 4. X A ~.\ . V! ~ \ 'o ~ ~B° ~ / ~ m ~ a s~ o . \ ~ \ ~ .. 4 \ i C~ ~` 1 ''°+ ' Z \ ~ ~( F-1 ~\ ~~ \ _1\`77,0 ~ `7 _ US \ / \ ~ 1 / ` . \ 1r ~\ ~ ~~ `o ~-~e v_;~ \ .__~_~ ~\_ 1~~ca ~ y n , ~\ F ` I ~ \_ ~ ~ rir Z Z J O °v ~ 1 or ~ r.. \ ..s--- ~ Z O ¢ cu \4 ° y~ - ~-- .. 1 f .,.~~-- ~- ~ ~S ~ -~'~ ¢ _ ¢ UI m Q ~ p Q m w ~ z ~ w - O Z a N"1 1 ~ 7~. ~ ¢ z ¢ a I ~ __ : ~ C7 w-w ~ _ -.. , HT fc. \_ 9+r G 2,, •.1 0 W ¢ O ¢ a.U J U 3 J j' g~ _ ~ D2 Z a¢ a ~' / ~~ ~ ~ 1 y,: °s. v NF I -~~ m ~ °` i N ¢_ ~WOO~O 000~~ U(n CEO ~ ~ m. ~ ,~ j ~r AS ~ ~ g ~' ~ ~ ~ `~ ~~ooa ~~Z1= ~ YZ¢Q~W N~O~ ~ ~ ... W ~ ...... _ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ 3N~Z~~o~~ ¢ ° ~_ i.°._ o ?c~W cn ~ ~ ~ m o c~ ~. I +~ \ ex~ ~ . ~wo~av>zoz o i o~~ `' • a~ = ~ O Q ~ ~ 4 ~ y ` g ~~2w 30 OQ n ~ f'~ 11 ~ z ~~ S f~~ tea. s ~~~ ~` o p~-~3v=i w~wa~~>- r°, ~ ~ \ -I X _ g x ana,r.az '- ~ / . h ~ _ pS =.t ~x Z w0¢JZNQU~J~ 3cnl=ova IN,~~o¢ ¢ o \ ~ y ~ 4+r ~~ o ~' I .'-'• ~ J Z dZ W F ~¢ m¢ ~ U W JUG ~ ZUJ~JU - NEED ,`.y `s <~ ~ ~ 1 ~ o c6g Q N W ¢ W? ~w WN~¢O = ~ _ a! I - ~': _m r ° u o ~ ,I (? ~ 1 --NOM ¢ ~ D cf] tD ? u ~ r p pi~ ~ S~ { o a °. .~ `,~ L • S'1 E a ' I o~ • 1 _\ 1 -_ W ~ ~ ~ ~ rr _ ~ `\ ~ T\ ~~ f ~ ~ \ . - a a - can cn o w u o - a ~T `'~\ ~\ 11 ~ ' ~ ~. I 11 I- I I I I ° act ~ \ ~. ~\ \ \f 4_ ~ ~ I o I I I 11 II ( I I N N ~ ~> \ ¢ \ \ • O 1 II I I I I _I ~' 1 2 \~h ~~ ~ r ~~\~~ a i I I ~ 1 ~ 1 I I I ~~ u u~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ I l i ti r ~~~ `ZT\ `~ al J Z W W ' ~ .~ _ _,_~\ \\ Q ~ K W f W b Q 1 W a F W W 7 1 ~ ~ ~~`T\~l~ - \ 1 °'1 '• \\.- W 2 Z 2 ~ Z Z K ~ O ~} ~ J 7 K Z J 0 W Z Z 1._-(r J~ O .U. O 1 \ \\ 1 `/ ~ ~ - >\ `` - I ~• \ J Z S G F f = K W Z O J W a~w aw., ~ wW wa ~~-w J Z~ W J 2 0 ~ K- W~ 1- 2 y K ~ O 7 Q' O Q F- ¢ 1- J O O W 7 a~ O W Q f~ ~ ww 1-c~3., ~ u W d' l1 Z Z W Z W W vl l' ~ L] O W J Q F- J Q a W a! c PO f U Q CL N N 4 3 N U W J U J U U W U'1.. W N N W l7 3 `\ :•- ~~ `~~ -gas .. ~ ~ . _ '°',~ I I n N ii I I i i I n l I I I I ~ I N ' N ~~®00°00~®~0, ~ x I N II I I " ° °.~ I~ I I l l i l ;~ II I I W I I I N 11 1 I I I I I I w a a w o Z • . ,` ` • • °.w °Q °rno g j`Q° ~ o °~ s° o.. ? ° ° o.rng - d ~y ° u v ~ .° ~ ~o _ _ ~ ~QQ ? £ c rnW c g nE E o u «~~ c ° . o °n ~' ' L~~° °~ J ;.E°C U° UN aC° r mx.s U7 .. - - d-.c m., u«~.'o on._ H° vc1p-I Eo o' °.W po°E Q. - ~~E : _ aim- °- rn r E c °. ° Lv °~i$ ° ° ~$ u o~`o ~° u i ° °~ .C Su "$ ~ 5°`0 ° N~ o~ o° ° m L" :° w~n o a f« s v o n ~ooy n uo!^ `u^ yr oo°o o °~~u n c° Eaoo o °~ ~o ~ aT c~ ooar °'mW~ Z ~~~o c ono E° E::E m.: ti°° I o°°ov°p - V. .Nr roO ~O O~V `~ nTC rE NY I yO° O G p co ' v M « hQn ° ' ° °° I ° o 3 ~ o ~ ~s ~ ~ ~> ° eo za e°av `°>. ° Yy ~ $'•c'• tau4~ E "O°`n° ~~~ ` o. -o a tie ~~ f Wol S u°c°c ° ~ ri s°to~ >,rn ° r m o i, nm o ~c m . O o w. ~ u N G 3T oNO o~~ N$ a p Snr z ~ o'u~~ °°~$a ° Eo-R t~. -O aE= ~o i m a°o ;o°o~ ~ g°=u~u c°~m " u -O° mo 3O`-' ~~rn ~5 i ° uo~°m-°•„ °' uEo°° % mi E +O ~~° i `S'°u4° °.~ c_ _m mm .• o °° o zE I V °; u~t.°.-' . r '^ Z etc . ~ ° Y ° ~ . rw ° ° ° o ns:. i ~ v aE ~ ° E ~ ~ o °? '~~ r o °S ~ a° = ° °o o ona~ n n •. z s ~o°°= °9 `a'o ' ~ `a o ° o"rn s3 ~ ° °° o we c -o ac I -moo °' no°c ~o `c,o° o'o ° o ; < o °~_ av °5 g~'o;. __ no "~~ " ~ +n° a c ; a ~ DoE ~ o f aa.c aEG 0 0 F m °° ~o °° ~ d woo: 1 r~ 1 U I w ~ p 0 0 rc 1 a a w w ~ ~I ~ s ~ ~ a N a ' I 1 ~ I ~ . r I n U W N " - (` r 1 i. -{-' ~-' N N N N 4- 4- O O RJ (L1 II II s S U U .~ ~ WW J J QQ U U !~ ~ J J Q Q U H .--~ Z. F- O ~ N w~ > c~ 0 W J Q 3 rn E W a J av °a W ~ Z W 4 ~ .J. O ~ ~ X ttW 3r a¢ K J W Y ~ r o °u3 m ~° W A wx as ~wW x i- F- ¢ wa A6 U d' ~ Z a aW U Z ~ o :~ m ~ a ~ .. W W Z ~ . a ~ o Z a o- W a _. _- _ _ J z a w `" w m W y 3 J -~ 3~ PE ~ Qy ~ Qy Y;A ~~~~ ~ WJ ~ WJ ~.~ E~a~ ~ Ga ~~ ~ ~? A~ i><~h ~ ~~ z~ 9 ~a z~ W 3F~ f~~~ SH 2.W~-. ~xi ~sg~t L1t~ ZW p~~ SBss~ KD H~ ~sg ..EzE f-l,. A 2 d5$~~~:~~ ~ W - W 0 //~~ LL_ //"~^~~ (V // V/ F-i Q L7 LL Z W ~° o O ON K ti a ~ e: ~ Z O W 6 2> 9 W n. w - 4 1 ~a maw Item 3 ~ REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No./Location: 04-068/ 14345 Springer Avenue Type of Application: Design Review Applicant/Owner: Srinivasa Malladi, Property Owner Staff Planner: Therese M. Schmidt, Associate Planne Date: Apri112, 2006 APN: 503-27-074 Department Head: John Livin stone, AICP, D SU W\IAN Mho \ \ •`F~''/~~ DR `~! I I •:.. \ ~ ' i ARBE~,CME LfL ~ ~„/ / I .. / l \ j~~ • ~V 998ATmhSI~NNWPLE;RD ~ ~ \ ! !/• \J~ ~ l J // / ~' 7 /: ^''; j~ ` gJtA I~NNY~JALE FR[~'• '`~~~ `~ ~ 7 SPFi1N}.,pecAY /i ~ ~ _ 1 / f ` i • ~ - ~ 1/ I 'i ~I ---_- r~ ~ ! I .IVN1.wP. ~1 i i ^ f `` ~ r , JI ~t Ir i ~ ,-._...__ l .-_ I "~ I INNWPLE RD ~~ ~~ I •,_ ti .\l I' r l ~ '~\ I I ! ' . J L \I i I . ~1~,,,~ ~ ~ / ,~ `~ f \ ` `~\\ ~~\ / y~~..- 94RATOG4 Y'~ ' l i ~ r i~ ~ l ~ } A /1~ ~ ~ fl / ; %~ '. ~~ %j `Q"^~'.' -~ ~ t SP~itH~iER AV ~ , f~~ `! ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~.~ J ~ ~ - - i ~ ~ ~ !S4R~i~Sl~NN1f~ RD ~_, ~` ` /h aN'F'N, - ~ ~ , j ~~. ~wl~Dwd~ rn ~\~ \~R~(~ca'rosliD ~ ~~ _ ~ ~ i% , slvx~r~av aani~sr, . t~,< a ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ - ,r \ , ,<~ ~ may; . ~°~ ~500ftBufferZme V~1 \ r~ ,~j~,~~\"`;"•~~~~/y'~ ~~~ (~ V ',.i.:" _ Parcels within 500 feet IN~GT _ r . ~~ \~~ ~' ~ ~r'~i "~ \~. ~ y~ ~\ `W E \'• .~' Streets ! '0 500 7000 1500 tti\,~•'\~~-l .~% :1 . .~ i : ~: \ ~ ; ,~\ ~ ~, ~ I t ~ ;~ _. .. 14345 Springer Avenue • Application No. 04-068; 14345 Springer Avenue • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY: Application filed: 03/30/04 Application complete: 10/08/04 Notice published: 11/24/04 Mailing completed: 11/16/04 Posting completed: 12/02/04 Application Heard and Continued by the Planning Commission: 12/08/04 Revised Plans Deemed Complete by Staff 03/20/06 Notice published:. 03/29/06 Mailing completed: 03/21/06 Posting completed: 04/04/06 BACKGROUND: The applicant originally requested design review approval to demolish none-story single- family residence and construct atwo-story single-family residence with an attached garage consisting of 3,368 square-feet with a maximum height of 24-feet. The floor area of the first floor was 2,272 square-feet and the second floor was 1,096 square-feet. In addition, a 1,380 square foot basement was proposed. The lot size is 10,265 square-feet and the site is zoned R-1 10,000. No trees were proposed for removal; however, tree #1, as illustrated in the arborist report prepared by Arbor Resources, dated April 6, 2004, was proposed for relocation which was an option provided by the City Arborist. The tree proposed for relocation is a young redwood (9.5 inch diameter) located in the front yard and is classified as a Native protected tree by the City's Municipal Code. The adjacent neighbor to the north, Dennis & Mary Anne Ryan, expressed concerns that the proposal would interfere with their views of the hillside from their kitchen and family room. At the December 8, 2004, the Planning Commission continued the item to a date uncertain to provide the applicant with an opportunity to redesign the project to reduce the visual impacts t the Ryans. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has redesigned the proposal by shifting the building pad location and changing the proposed arched windows and is now requesting design review approval to demolish aone-story single-family residence and construct atwo-story single-family residence with an attached garage consisting of 3,349 square-feet with a maximum height of 24-feet 6-inches. The floor area of the proposed first floor is 1,808 square-feet and the second floor is 1,121 square-feet. In addition, a 1,494 square-foot basement is proposed. 2 Application No. 04-068; 14345 Springer Avenue No trees are proposed for removal with the exception of Tree #l, which is still being relocated as recommended by the City's arborist. STAFF RECOMIV~NDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the application for Design Review with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. • 3 Application No. 04-068; 14345 Springer Avenue STAFF ANALYSIS • ZONING: R-1-10,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: M-10,000 (Residential Medium Density), 4.35 Max Dwelling Units per Net Acre MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE: 10,265 square- feet (Gross & Net) SLOPE: level (Less than 10%) GRADING REQUIRED: Not applicable ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed project consisting of demolition of a single-story residence that is not culturally significant and construction of a -new single- family residence is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-family residences. PROJECT DATA: Proposal Code Requirements Lot Coverage: Residence & Garage 2,228 sq. ft. Driveway 1,097 sq. ft. Patios and porches 524 sq. ft. Walkways 414 scq ft. Maximum Allowable 42% 60% TOTAL 4,263 sq. ft. 6,159 sq. ft. Floor Area: First floor 1,808 sq. ft. Second Floor 1,12.1 sq. ft. Garage 420 sq. ft. Maximum Allowable TOTAL 3,349 3,370 sq. ft. Basement: Maximum Allowable TOTAL 1,494 sq. ft. 2,228 sq. ft. • 4 Application No. 04-068; 14345 Springer Avenue Proposal Minimum Requirement Setbacks: Front 38 ft. 3-in. 25 ft. Rear ls` story 38 ft. 11-in. 25 ft. 2nd story 35 ft. 7-in. 35 ft. Left Side (South) 1 sc story 13 ft. 10-in. 10 ft. 2°a story 20 ft. 6-in. 15 ft. Right Side (North) 1 S` story 10 ft. 10 ft. 2na Story 17 ft. 15 ft. Height: At the topmost point of Maximum Allowable the structure 24 ft. 6-in. 26 ft. PROJECT DISCUSSION: Zoning Code Section 15-45.060(1) requires Design Review Approval by the Planning Commission for any new multi-story main structure. The applicant requests Design Review • Approval to demolish aone-story single-family residence and construct atwo-story single- family residence with an attached garage consisting of 3,349 square-feet with a maximum height of 24-feet 6-inches. The floor area of the proposed first floor is 1,808 square-feet and the second floor is 1,121 square-feet. In addition, a 1,494 square-foot basement is proposed. The applicant has redesigned the original proposal by removing atwo-story turret from the front facade, shifted the building pad back further from the front property line, and reduced the extent of the arch of a proposed bay in the front facade in order to reduce visual impacts to their neighbor's, the Ryans, view shed. The applicant is proposing a traditional modern architectural style with a modest front gable porch. The building line parallel to the front property line of the proposed residence staggers back or steps away from the street. The result is a soft facade that is not bulky or massive. The front entry is appropriately scaled and proportional. It does not include contrived large-scale roof elements, columns, or porticos. Rooflines from the first floor effectively break-up the mass and bulk of the second story. Hipped rooflines also minimize mass and bulk. The two-car garage does not dominate the front facade; instead, it has been well designed to minimize visual impacts to the streetscape. The garage is attached to the main residence; however, it is recessed greatly from the building line of the front entry. The two garage bays . are staggered and a sectional divides the-bays. A trellis is proposed above the bays, which further softens the visual impacts to Springer Avenue. 5 Application No. 04-068; 14345 Springer Avenue Unique and distinct architectural features include round or curved building lines across the • front facade. The windows are also trimmed creating depth and shadowing. Decorative beams or braces are proposed in several locations on the front facade. The homes in the general area of Springer, Paul, and Elva, despite the narrow lots, are a mixture of one and two-story structures in various architectural styles. Neighbor Correspondence The applicant has re-circulated the City's Neighbor Notification Form with the revised drawings and has received four responses (copies of the Forms are located in Attachment No. 3), all have which have indicated that they have reviewed the plans and do not have any concerns or issues which need to be addressed by the applicant. However, the Ryans have indicated that while the modified plans appear to open additional view shed they reserve their right to make comments after the story poles have been installed. Geotechnical Clearance As conditioned, the proposal has received geotechnical clearance to proceed. Trees No trees are proposed for removal; however, Tree #1 is proposed for relocation which was an option provided by the City Arborist. The tree proposed for relocation is a young redwood (9.5 inch diameter) located in the front yard. The relocated redwood has been • shown on the proposed landscape plans. The arborist has prescribed conditions associated with the relocation of Tree #l. Three additional ordinance protected trees were inventoried. They are all located on adjacent properties. As a project condition, the location of the transplanted redwood will be reviewed by the Ryans to ensure that their view shed will not be compromised. General Plan Findings The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan including the following Policies: Conservation Element Policy 6.0 -Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development The proposal will protect the rural atmosphere of Saratoga by utilizing an existing residential site instead of developing a vacant parcel. The proposal will not unreasonably block the views of the surrounding hills from neighboring parcels, nor will it be visible from major streets. • 6 Application No. 04-068; 14345 Springer Avenue • Land Use Element Policy S 0 -The Ciry shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the Fmdings required for Design Approval. The proposed square footage and height is comparable to the neighborhood. The existing neighborhood consists of a variety of architectural styles. The architectural style proposed will provide additional variety lending to a unique neighborhood with a distinct sense of place. . Design Review Findings The proposed project is consistent with all the following Design Review findings stated in MCS 15-45.080: (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The maximum height of the proposed two-story dwelling is 24-feet 6-inches. The structure has been redesigned to ensure that the proposal does not unreasonably interfere with views and privacy of the abutting neighbors. The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the-views from Springer Avenue. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. One (1) protected tree is proposed for relocation on the site; however, as conditioned .and mitigated the proposal will preserve the existing natural landscape. • (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. The proposal is not requesting removal of Native and/or Heritage trees; however, Tree #1, a Coast Redwood, is proposed for relocation on the site, which was an option provided by the City Arborist. The proposal, as conditioned, would not impact Native and/or Heritage Trees. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulb The applicant is proposing a neutral color pallet for the exterior building, window trim and roofing materials as well as incorporating varying rooflines and exterior building materials to reduce the perception of excessive bulk. In addition, -the applicant is proposing greater set- backs than are required, which will also. reduce the visual impact of the proposed second-story addition. (e) Compatible bulk and height. Residences in the area are predominately one and two-story. The proposal is compatible in bulk and height with the neighborhood. (fJ Current grading and erosion control methods. Since the building site is relatively flat and the proposed addition is in the general area of the existing residence, no grading is proposed. In addition, the proposal shall conform to the City's current grading and erosion control standards. (g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to all of the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in • 7 Application No. 04-068; 14345 Springer Avenue terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and • views as detailed in the findings above and staff report. Conclusion Staff finds that all of the Design Review findings can be made in the affirmative and the proposal is consistent with the General Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the .Planning Commission fmd this Application exempt from CEQA and approve the application for Design Review with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution of Approval. 2. Affidavit of mailing notices and mailing labels for project notification. 3. Neighbor notification Templates. 4. Arborist Report, dated Apri16, 2004. 5. Reduced plans, exhibit "A." • C 8 C7 • Attachment 1 • • • RESOLUTION NO. Application No. 04-068 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Malladi: 14345 Springer Avenue WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review Approval to demolish cone-story single-family residence and construct a two-story single-family residence with an attached garage consisting of 3,349 square-feet with a maximum height of 24-feet 6-inches. The floor area of the proposed -first floor is 1,808 square-feet and the second floor is-1,121 square-feet. In addition, a 1,494 square-foot basement is proposed. The maximum height of the proposed residence will be not higher than 24-feet 6-inches. The gross and net lot size is 10,265 square-feet and the site is zoned R-1-10,000; and WHEREAS, Zoning Code Section 15-45.060(1) requires Design Review Approval by the Planning Commission for any new multi-story main structure; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were .given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS The ro osed ro'ect consistin of demolition of a sin le-sto residence P P p J g g rY that is not culturally significant and construction of a new single-family residence is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303; "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single-family residences; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Design Review, and is consistent with the following General Plan Policies: Conservation Element Policy 6.0 -Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. The proposal will protect the rural atmosphere of Saratoga by utilizing an existing residential site instead of developing a vacant parcel. The proposal will not unreasonably block the views of the surrounding hills from neighboring parcels, nor will it be visible from major streets. Application No. 04-068; 14345 Springer Avenue Land Use Element Policy S.0 -The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with- the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the Findings required for Design Approval. The proposed square footage and height is comparable to the neighborhood. The existing neighborhood consists of a variety of architectural styles. The architectural style proposed will provide additional variety lending to a unique neighborhood with a distinct sense of place. WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support the findings required for said application for Design Review Approval, as set forth below: (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The maximum height of the proposed two-story dwelling is 24-feet 6-inches. The structure has been redesigned to ensure that the proposal does- not unreasonably interfere with views .and privacy of the abutting neighbors. The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the views from Springer Avenue. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. One (1) protected tree is proposed for relocation on the site; however, as conditioned and mitigated the proposal will preserve the existing natural landscape. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. The proposal is not requesting removal of Native and/or Heritage trees; however, Tree #1, a Coast Redwood, is proposed for relocation on the site, which was an option provided by the City Arborist. The proposal, as conditioned, would not impact Native and/or Heritage Trees. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulb The applicant is proposing a neutral color pallet for the exterior building, window trim and roofing materials as well as incorporating varying rooflines and exterior building materials to reduce the perception of excessive bulk. In addition, the applicant is proposing greater set- backs than are required, which will also reduce the visual impact of the proposed second-story addition. (e) Compatible bulk and height. Residences in the area are predominately one and two-story. The proposal is compatible in bulk and height with the neighborhood. (fJ Current grading and erosion control methods Since the building site is relatively flat and the proposed addition is in the general area of the existing residence, no grading is proposed. In addition, the proposal shall conform to the City's current grading and erosion control standards. • 2 Application No. 04-068; 14345 Springer Avenue (g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to all of the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above and staff report. Now, THExEFOxE,-the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the application, site plan, architectural drawings, -plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, Application No. 04-068 for Design Review Approval, as conditioned, is hereby found exempt from CEQA and in compliance with the required findings set forth above, and based thereon is granted subject to the following conditions: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A" date stamped March 23, 2006, incorporated by reference. All changes to the approved .plans must be submitted in writing with plans showing the changes and are subject to the Community Development Director's approval. 2. The project shall utilize materials illustrated on a materials board date stamped April 4, 2006. 3. The followin shall be re aired and/or included as to the Tans submitted to the g q p Building Division for the building plan check review process: a. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans incorporating this Resolution and the arborist report prepared by Arbor Resources, dated Apri16, 2005, as a separate plan page. b. The following note shall be included: "A maximum of one wood-burning fireplace is permitted and it shall be equipped with a gas starter. All other fireplaces shall be gas burning." c. The following note shall be included verifying building setback:. "Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the Licensed Land Surveyor of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per approved plans." 4. The following shall be required and/or included as to the plans submitted to the Building Division for the building plan check review process: 3 Application No. 04-068; 14345 Springer Avenue d. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans incorporating this Resolution and the arborist report prepared by Arbor Resources, dated Apri16, 2005, as a separate plan page. e. The following note shall be included: "A maximum of one wood-burning fireplace is permitted and it shall be equipped with a gas starter. All other fireplaces shall be gas burning." f. The following note shall be included verifying building setback: "Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the Licensed Land Surveyor. of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per approved plans." 3. A storm water retention plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval indicating how all storm water will be retained on-site, and incorporating the New Development and Construction -Best Management Practices. If all storm water cannot be retained on-site due to topographic, soils or other constraints, an explanatory note shall be provided on the plan. 4. Landscape plan shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff, promote surface infiltration and minimize use of fertilizers and pesticides that can contribute to water pollution. 5. To the extent feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. 6. To the extent feasible, pest resistant landscaping plants shall be used throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. 7. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. 8. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained- and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. 9. Staff shall not approve downgrading to the exterior appearance of the approved residence. Downgrades may include, but are not limited to, garage doors, • 4 Application No. 04-068; 14345 Springer Avenue architectural detailing, stonework, columns, shutters, driveway materials, or similar items. Any exterior changes to approved plans resulting in a downgrade shall require filing an additional application and fees for review by the Planning Commission as a modification to approved plans. Any other exterior changes to the approved plans, which are not deemed a downgrade by staff, shall require a Zoning Clearance issued by the Community Development Director with payment of appropriate fees. 10. All processing fees, in the form of deposit accounts on file with the community development department, shall be reconciled with a minimum $500.00 surplus balance at all times. In the event that the balance is less than $500.00, all staff work on the project shall cease until the balance is restored to a minimum $500.00. FIRE DISTRICT 11. Applicant shall comply with all Fire Department conditions. PUBLIC WORKS 12. Applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit for improvements in the City right- of-way prior to commencement of the work. ARBORIST REPORT 13. All recommendations in the Arborist's Report prepared by Arbor Resources dated April 6, 2004, and incorporated herein by this reference shall be followed and incorporated -into the plans. 14. Prior to relocating Tree # 1, the applicant shall provide Planning Staff with written confirmation that the Ryans have had an opportunity to review and concur with the proposed location of the tree. 15. Prior to issuance of Building Permits the applicant shall obtain a tree bond, or similar funding mechanism, in the amount of $6,800.00. CITY ATTORNEY 16. Owner and Applicant agree to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. Application No. 04-068; 14345 Springer Avenue Section 2. A Building Permit must be issued and construction commenced within 36 months from the date of adoption of this Resolution or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15-90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. PASSED ANn ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 12th day of Apri12006 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: , ABSTAIN: Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: John F. Livingstone, AICP .Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date • • 6 • Attachment 2 • • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, Denise Kaspar ,being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, -over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the 24th day of March , 2006, that I deposited in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage- thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to- wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15-45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara (updated March 10, 2006) as being. owners of property within S00 feet of the property described. as: 503-27-074, 14345 Springer Avenue; that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. ~Lrr%~i enise Kaspar Advanced Listing Services • City of Saratoga Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 408-868-1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Saratoga's Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on: Wednesday, the 12 day of April 2006, at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall theater located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. The public hearing agenda item is stated below. Details of this item are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Please consult the City website at www.saratoga.ca.us regarding Friday office closures. APPLICATION/ADDRESS: 04-068 14345 Springer Avenue APPLICANT: Malladi APN: 503-27-074 DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Design Review Approval to demolition a 1,169 sq. ft. one-story residence -and construct a 3,349 sq. ft. two-story residence with a basement and an attached garage. The maximum height of the proposed residence will not be higher than 25-feet. The gross lot size is 10,265 sq. ft. and the site is zoned R-1, 10,000. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time- and place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a Public Hearing in court, you maybe limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing. In order for information to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed on or before Apri14, 2006. This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor's office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out-of--date information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all residents potentially affected by a project. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone. in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Therese Schmidt Associate Planner- 408-868-1230 March 24, 2006 ' Ownership Listing pared for: 503-27-074 Srinivasa R & Padmaja Malladi 14345 Springer Ave Saratoga CA 95070 X03-23-023 503-23-024 503-23-025 ~=:velyn Johnston Sarangan Rangachari Evelyn-Johnston :x Current Resident or Current Resident PO Box 53 20611 Brookwood Ln 20613 Brookwood Ln Saratoga CA 95071 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-23-030- 503-23-042 503-23-043 Logan Deimler Wayne Liu John R Kettmann or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 14320 Springer Ave 14256 Springer Ave 14250 Springer Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-23-044 503-23-045 503-23-046 Chander & Anupama Sarna David A & Janine Belshaw Michael & Kymberley Morganstern or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 14224 Springer Ave 14240 Springer Ave 14242 Springer Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 ~ 23-049 503-23-052 503-23-053 ?~~wncy E Kessler Patrick Brockett David S Johnston ~r Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident X0626 Brookwood Ln 20620 Brookwood Ln 20616 Brookwood Ln Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-26-002 503-26-003 503-26-004 Tr Jacklin Kaye A & Wilson Holbrook Doris Bronzich or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 14436 Esterlee Ave 20980 Canyon View Dr 20896 4Th St Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-26-005 ~ 503-26-006 503-26-007 Patrick K Lam Paul D Kass Masoud Jafari or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 20880 4Th St 20870 4Th St 20860 4Th St Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 r03-26-008 503-26-010 ."~~Yic O Kraule 503-26-009 Paul & Florence Schroeder ^c Current Resident Kiet Tran or Current Resident PO Box 3754 20850 4Th St Saratoga CA 95070 14425 Springer Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 ~6-011 503-26-012,013 503-26-057,58 503-26-014 st O & Paula Kraule Ernest Kraule Todd A & Lisa Beatty 14445 Springer Ave or Current Resident or Current Resident Saratoga CA 95070 14445 Springer Ave 14461 Springer Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-26-O1S 503-26-018 503-26-020 503-26-021 Ann Barber Hamid Moshtaghi David R Reed or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 14471 Springer Ave 20758 Wildwood Way 20750 Wildwood Way Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 :503-26-022 503-26-026 027 030 503-26-028 ~•ler D & Belinda Heerwagen , , Claudette Ford .Jerry & Anne Chen ~r Current Resident 824 24Th Avenue or Current Resident ^346 Wildwood Way San Francisco CA 94121 14005 Wildwood Way <:aratoga CA 95070 . Saratoga CA 95070 503-26-029 503-26-031 503-26-032 Everet D & Lucie Killian Rodolfo & Gloria Ruano Amit Bahl or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 14395 Wildwood Way 14370 Springer Ave 14362 Springer Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-26-035 503-26-043 503-26-044 Michael W & Rosalia Warren Michael Ohearn Saratoga City Of or Current Resident 11 S New St 13777 Fruitvale Ave 14481 Springer Ave Santa Cruz CA 95060 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-26-046 503-26-048 503-26-OSO '~;.~nneth P & Carol Schulz Shao-Hung Liu Mary Gomez ~r Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident x001 Springer Ave 14491 Springer Ave 14400 Springer Ave ~ratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-26-051 503-26-OS2 503-26-054 Neelam Kakkar Jane-Min Nee Bonnie J Wright or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 20760 Wildwood Way 14352 Springer Ave 14433 Wildwood Way Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-26-088,056 503-27-016 503-27-017 Phillip Jacklin Maria EGarcia -Hoek- & Rieko Van Den or Current Resident or Current Resident 15470 Bohlman Rd 14436 Esterlee Ave 20845 4Th St Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-27-018 503-27-020 503-27-021 ' ~.'~chael G & Sheila Penuen Lloyd G Stephens Priscilla F & Donald Poole ~•_. Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident `.:380 Elva Ave 14350 Elva Ave 14340 Elva Ave `~aratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-27-022 503-27-023 503-27-024 Shun W Quon Chester Stanaro James L Hester or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 14330 Elva Ave 14320 Elva Ave 14310 Elva Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-27-027 503-27-028 503-27-026 Yit-Sun A Wu Juno Lin Robin Yeamans or Current Resident or Current Resident 20480 Blauer Dr C 14270 Elva Ave 14260 Elva Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 • ~~ • 503-27-036 503-27-037 503-27-038 Babak Hashemi James M Mccabe Dal S Oh er Current Resident 23 Gladeview Way or Current Resident ;..4241 Paul Ave San Francisco CA 94131 14261 Paul Ave toga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 _~. -•:-3-27-039 503-27-040 503-27-041 Aurelio & Jing Rios Tat C & Tina Choi Amin R & Narjes Ghafouri or Current Resident . or Current Resident or Current Resident 14271 Paul Ave 14281 Paul Ave 14291 Paul Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-27-042 .503-27-044 503-27-045 Aric J & Claire Kazarnovsky Robert & Shirley Cancellieri Bruce & Roberta Marshall or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 14301 Paul Ave 14331 Paul Ave 14341 Paul Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-27-047 503-27-048 503-27-050 Tae & Kummi Kim Ross & Susan Hannibal Zhaoqing Ma or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident '4365 Paul Ave 14375 Paul Ave 14360 Paul Ave 4ratoga CA 95070 Sazatoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 i_ °73-27-051 503-27-052 503-27-053 Sam Cartmell John F Mehaffey Gary M Nishimoto or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 14350 Paul Ave 14340 Paul Ave 14330 Paul Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 27-054,057 503-27-055 .503-27-056 Tibor Szalay Edward Y & Tehchi Chien Mazyanne Nola or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 14328 Paul Ave 14314 Paul Ave 14300 Paul Ave Sazatoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-27-058 503-27-059 503-27-060 Richard H Shaw Joseph L & Maria Kovacs David Huang or Current Resident ?C~ Box 164 PO Box 895 14260 Paul Ave <<'~=tiratoga CA 95071 Rutherford Nj 7070 Sazatoga CA 95070 503-27-062 503-27-066 X03-27-061 Stephen A & Linda Calebotta Thomas J Belpasso Ivlazkhovsky Trust or Current Resident or Current Resident 14630 Springer Ct 14240 Paul Ave 14241 Springer Ave Sazatoga CA 95070 Sazatoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-27-067 503-27-068 503-27-069 Ronald P & Yolanda Martin Qian-Yang Donald M & Ruth Schwartz or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 1425.1 Springer Ave 14261 Springer Ave 14271 Springer Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 -27-071 503-27-073 503-27-074 on L Shuper Dennis P & Mary Ryan Srinivasa R & Padmaja Malladi urrent Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident !.'305 Springer Ave 14325 Springer Ave 14345 Springer Ave `'"~=atoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 ~'~';3-27-075 503-27-076 503-27-077 Steven & Yvonne Zivanic Robert L Weinmann Schneider 2004 'sir Current Resident or Current Resident 14510 Big Basin Way 226 14361 Springer Ave 14371 Springer Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-27-078 503-27-079 503-27-082 Richad & Suzan Deignan Kraft 1998 James & Kathleen Arena or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident. 14291 Springer Ave 14299 Springer Ave 14294 Elva Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-27-083 503-27-093 503-27-094 Ung-Do Shin Samuel U & Susan Kim Judith E Poutre or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 14288 Elva Ave 14370 Elva Ave 14360 Elva Ave Saratoga CA 95070 ~ Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 ~~!J3-27-095 503-27-096 503-27-097 ~± Nicholas Russian Orthodox Gr James D & Judith Hillman Youssef & Maliheh Amirkiai ~ Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 14220 Elva Ave 14387 Paul Ave 14399 Paul Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-27-100 503-27-101 503-27-108 Scott 2004 Jie Chen Beverly A Slavin or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 14315 Springer Ave 14230 Paul Ave 14305 Paul Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-27-109 503-27-110 503-27-111 Pirooz & Nazanin Tooyserkani Jonathan & Sunny Cho Rajasekar Venkatesan or Current Resident or Current Resident p0 Box 2759 14315 Paul Ave 14361 Paul Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 "'93-27-112 503-63-001 503-63-002 'sul & Pamela Mcdonald Gatehouse Condominum Homeowners Anthony Yung ~r Current Resident or Current Resident 13731 Beaumorit Ave 14231 Springer Ave 20810 4Th St 1 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-003 503-63-004 503-63-005 Mcgrath Trust Sandra Kamiak David W Mantelli or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 20810 4Th St 3 20810 4Th St 4 20812 4Th St 1 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-008 503-63-006, 112 503-63-007 Marcelline E Houde Kathryn B Warren Schwendinger 1991 or Current Resident 501 Cliffside Ct 12724 Plymouth Dr 20812 4Th St 4 Richmond CA 94801 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 ,; 503-27-095 :~73-63-009 503-63-010 St Nicholas Russian Orthodox Gr Elsie M Cochrane Stanley A & Miriam Demartinis or Current Resident 13615 Vaquero Ct 21315 Saratoga Hills Rd 14220 Elva Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 • 503-27-096 503-27-097 503-27-100 lames D & Judith Hillman Youssef & Maliheh Amirkiai Scott 2004 or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 87 Paul Ave 14399 Paul Ave 14315 Springer Ave oga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-27-101 503-27-108 503-27-109 Jie Chen Beverly A Slavin Pirooz & Nazanin Tooyserkani or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 14230 Paul Ave 14305 Paul Ave 14315 Paul Ave Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-27-110 503-27-112 503-27-111 Paul & Pamela Mcdonald '~~:aathan & Sunny Cho Rajasekar Venkatesan or Current Resident gun ent Resident PO Box 2759 <1361 Paul Ave 14231 Springer Ave >aratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-001- 503-63-002 503-63-003 Gatehouse Condominum Homeowners Anthony Yung Mcgrath Trust or Current Resident 13731 Beaumont Ave or Current Resident 20810 4Th St 1 Saratoga CA 95070 20810 4Th St 3 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-004 503-63-005 503-63-006,112 Sandra Kamiak David W Mantelli Kathryn B Warren or Current Resident or Current Resident 501 Cliffside Ct 20810 4Th St 4 20812 4Th St 1 Richmond CA 94801 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 • -63-007 503-63-008 303-63-009 '~~nwendinger 1991 Marcelline E Houde Elsie M Cochrane X724 Plymouth Dr or Current Resident 13615 Vaquero Ct aratoga CA 95070 20812 4Th St 4 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-O11 503-63-012 503-63-010 Laura Griswold William & Diana Rogers Stanley A & Miriam Demartinis or Current Resident or Current Resident 21315 Saratoga Hills Rd 20812 4Th St 7 20812 4Th St 8 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-013 503-63-014 503-63-015 Robert M Jakob Brian R & Anitalynn Tighe Jeng & Zeuu Chyi PO Box 6214 6374 Candlewood Ct 15214 Bellecourt San Jose CA 95150 Cupertino CA 95014 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-017 503-63-018 r 3-63-016 Jason W & Kathy Nolet Olga N Lvov ':-an B Tighe or Current Resident or Current Resident ~~~7 Junipero Plz 20812 4Th St 15 20812 4Th St 14 "anta Barbara CA 93105 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-020 503-63-021 ~3-019 Daniel Dorsa Zarecky 2004 e Trust or Current Resident or Current Resident 20061 Chateau Dr 20812 4Th St 16 20812 4Th St 19 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-022 503-63-023 503-63-024 Guanghui Qian Mike J & Linda Boden Lorraine A Wheeler or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 20812 4Th St 18 20812 4Th St 21 20812 4Th St 20 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-025 503-63-026 503-63-027 Thomas M & Paula Brennock Kirk K & Pi-Cheng Yen Kugler Trust or Current Resident or Current Resident 18481 Montpere Way 40812 4Th St 23 20812 4Th St 22 Saratoga CA 95070 ~:aratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 =`83-63-028 503-63-029 503-63-030 Tim & Lisa Arnett Thomas E & Sascha Lale Janet M Granito or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 20812 4Th St 24 20760 4Th St 11 20760 4Th St 12 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-031 503-63-032 503-63-033 Laura Brash Evelyn A Lee Viktor Schram or Current Resident 2182 36Th Ave or Current Resident 20760 4Th St 9 San Francisco CA 94116 20760 4Th St 7 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-034 503-63-035 503-63-036 Ronald A Anderson Roger B & Rosalee Eggleston Janardhanan S Ajit or Current Resident 12487 Arroyo De Arguello 67 Figtree 44 `1760 4Th St 8 Saratoga CA 95070 Irvine CA 92603 "aratoga CA 95070 "~03-63-037 Veronica Cruz or Current Resident 20760 4Th St 3 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-038 503-63-039 503-63-040 Kenneth J Czworniak J H & Lillian Silberstein Hossein & Azita Sobhani or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 20760 4Th St 4 20760 4Th St 1 20760 4Th St 2 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-041 503-63-042 503-63-043 T'om T Chen Stephen & Anne Boboricken Cynthia A Roessler ~r Current Resident 11870 Francemont Ave or Current Resident l~~740 4Th St 11 Los Altos Hills CA 94022 20740 4Th St 9 '`.aratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 `?J3-63-044 503-63-045 503-63-046 Leslie A Binder Aleksey Bakharev David M Fradin or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 20740 4Th St 10 20740 4Th St 7 20740 4Th St 8 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-047 503-63-048 503-63-049 Jay M Stearns Rose S Koot Linda E Lawson or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 20740 4Th St 5 20740 4Th St 6 20740 4Th St 3 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 • • • 503-63-051 503-63-052 503-63-050 George & Beverly Cingolani Arevig Antablian Victor & Regina Velton or Current Resident or Current Resident 4662 Blue Ridge Dr 20740 4Th St 1 20740 4Th St 2 Jose CA 95129 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 '3-63-053 503-63-054 503-63-055 "?~oshi & Takako Fujigami John P & Christina Black Bakhyt Zhumabayeva ~~- Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident X0720 4Th St 17 20720 4Th St 16 20720 4Th St 15 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-056 503-63-057 503-63-058 Kathleen Soderstrom Jin W & Min Park Salvador Borja 12908 Pierce Rd or Current Resident or Current Resident Saratoga CA 95070 20720 4Th St 11 20720 4Th St 12 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-059 503-63-060 503-63-061 Janice R Gauthier Hsueh H & Hung Tai Shellie Williams or Current Resident or Current Resident 11951 Brookridge Dr 20720 4Th St 9 20720 4Th St 10 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 ~_> ~~~3-63-062 503-63-063 503-63-064 ~•~orge E & Nancy Kirk Mehran & Avideh Samardar Kelly A Walsh ~~:~270 La Paloma Ave 915 Maclay Dr 10230 Scenic Blvd Saratoga CA 95070 San Jose CA 95123 Cupertino CA 95014 ~ 503-63-067 63-065 Debra D Jackson 503-63-066 Richard E & Barbara Straw Hung- Bang or Current Resident 24179 Surnrnit Woods Dr or Current Resident 20720 4Th St 3 Los Gatos CA 95033 20720 4Th St 1 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-068 503-63-069 503-63-070 Katherine A Forte Barbara K Van Derveer Leslie Davis or Current Resident PO Box 194 or Current Resident 20720 4Th St 2 Saratoga CA 95071 20700 4Th St 12 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 ~~~~-63-071 503-63-072 503-63-073 :~~velle Kelly Natalie J Weiskal Wayne Chang r Current Resident or Current Resident PO Box 3791 L0700 4Th St 9 20700 4Th St 10 Los Altos CA 94024 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-075 503-63-076 503-63-074,094,096 Dennis C & Grace Leung Mark C Lianides Michael E & Gayle Archer or Current Resident or Current Resident PO Box 7367 20700 4Th St 5 20700 4Th St 6 Incline Village Nv 89452 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 3-077 503-63-078 503-63-079 an E Lepiane Joan C Goldman Gary G & Madeline -Chiavetta .15890 Shannon Rd 1624 Lyle Dr 19548 Chardonnay Ct Ct Los Gatos CA 95032 San Jose CA 95129 Saratoga CA 95070 ;••":73-63-080 503-63-081 503-63-082 :nett C Holmes Carl F & Betty Zanger Mabel Kao --~ current Resident 10229 Adriana Ave or Current Resident X0700 4Th St 2 Cupertino CA 95014 20800 4Th St 12 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-083 503-63-084 503-63-085 Linda & Ronald Lawson Anita A Ledbetter Richard & N Winner 14090 Elvira St or Current Resident 7616 Via La Luna Ln Saratoga CA 95070 20800 4Th St 10 Sacramento CA 95828 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-086 503-63-087 503-63-088 Robert A & Yvonne Duncanson Erika Nelson Joseph A & Mildred Plicka or C~urent Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 20800 4Th St 8 20800 4Th St 5 20800 4Th St 6 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-090 503-63-091 =`')3-63-089 Min Hu '',+~eph & Susan Long or Current Resident Fred L & Dorine Alvord ''O Box 2095 13782 Calle Tacuba Saratoga CA 95070 20800 4Th St 4 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-092 503-63-093 503-63-095 Mathew T Flenniken Carl Dierkes Dennis A & Linda Dumont or Current Resident PO Box 495 or Current Resident 20800 4Th St 2 Saratoga CA 95071 20790 4Th St 5 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 099 503 63 503-63-098 - - 03-63-097 5 Mehran & Avideh Samardar Sai Ting Jennifer L Paoli or Current Resident or Current Resident 16280 Los Serenos Robles 20790 4Th St 4 20790 4Th St 1 Cvlonte Sereno CA 95030 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 jJ3-63-100 503-63-101 503-63-102 ~.-~nald S & Kathleen Manzagol Elie Younes Michele Castillo `.2078 Saddle Rd or Current Resident 1636 Villarita Dr 20780 4Th St 11 CAm bell CA 95008 Munterey CA 93940 Saratoga CA 95070 p 503-63-103 503-63-104 503-63-105 Joy C Younes Anna Medeiros Christine M Zak or Current Resident or Current Resident or Current Resident 20780 4Th St 9 20780 4Th St 10 20780 4Th St 7 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-63-106 503-63-107 503-63-108 Peter H Rhee Kathleen Gale C1 Holterhoff 1150 Scott Blvd D2 3720 Capitola Rd 355 Woodlet Way Santa Clara CA 95050 Santa Cruz CA 95062 Thousand Oaks CA 91361 503-63-110 503-63-111 ~,~-63-109 Natalia Jimenez Bert & Vivian Burger ':'+;:hard F & Patricia Bader 1120 Michaels Dr or Current Resident 13575 Old Tree Way Saratoga CA 95070 20780 4Th St 4 Saratoga CA 95070 Saratoga CA 95070 503-26-044 'City of Saratoga Attn: Therese Schmidt ~77 Fruitvale Ave toga CA 95070 • • C~ • • Attachment 3 • • • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form' Date: ~ /l Q ?~ PROJECT ADDRESS: ! ~ 3 ~S ~ ,r- ~~ Applicant Name: Y ~ si t i~v1 Sg f ~ f ~,~~~~1~c . Application Number: ~ y- - U~~ Staf,~'and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may ~Ve directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Regardless of the opinion expressed below, you reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date during the actual public review and appeal periods. UMy signature belo w certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of wo and I do NOT. have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project, ~My signature below certifies the following: I Kaye review understand the sco a of work• and I Lave issues or concerns wL~cL after discussion with the appL'~~ have not been addressed. My concen~s are the following (please • attach additional sheets if necessary): Neighbor Name: S~P~~ CLN.o~ yU~~P/ 2l ~~~,.~ ~ Neighbor Address: . NeighLor rhone i#: ~ 7 G ~ Sign Printed: . ~~ S~~7v 2~'v~t~~- ~ y~~..~ z~v~« City of Saratoga I~Teighbor 1Voti~ication dorm' Date: ~..~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~,.~ PROJECT ADDRBSS:_ f ~ ~ 4 ~ ~T~ ~ ~~ ~' ~.~~~ Applicant Name: ..•~ :;,. ~ y~~~~ S !L'I {;:: ; c.~-~ ,. Application Number: ~ ~- -- ~~ l~ ~"~ Staff anal the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the. signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Regardless of the opinion expressed below, you reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later.date during the actual public review and appeal.periods. signature below certifies the following: I have reviewefl"the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do 1VOT have any concerns or issues-which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. ^My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the'project plans; I • understand the scope of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please • attach additio~n-al sheets if necessary): 1 J i~ ~ /~~i F'~ ~-cb ~~~ ~~B ~i l" ~~ ~ p~~t Sa1ms er //G emu/.. lifi~ w~ ~~ ~:~ •Z ~D-e GL 9~ c~~~ /" G c~c~ri. G ~ ~~r/ ~~e /moo ¢/9~iC~',~1/~t~ ~f ~~'~ ~ ~~ ~ ~J / Neighbor Name: ~e~~i~ ~ ~ar bye: ~ ~~ Neighbor Address: ~j' ~~o~ ~ S r/ir e r ~ z% ~~ ~ ~ ~, ~ 9S a ~Cy Neighbor Phone #: Printed: ~.~~~s 1~y~~, -~ Signature: ~ Neighbor Noti#ication Template for Development Applications Date: ~ ~' • PR07ECT AD RESS:• I ~f- 3 S- S ~n`v~t• /~~. Applicant Name: s'P' i~V~ V' Gt 50~..~~~tG~, ~- Application Number: -- .~ g The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address, issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of .the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning C-ommission does. not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to, the public hearing. Staj~'and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective o, f the opinion expressed below, you ,may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. _ . ~My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I do NOS have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. ' ^My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following. (please attach additional sheets if necessary): _~ ~°e Neighbor Name: `1 t ~-'- • Neighbor Address: Neighbor Phone #: ~ Q 0 a ~ D Z3~ Signs e: Printed: 1'~ m L-o City of Saratoga Planning Department City of Saratoga hIeighbor Notification dorm' r ':~ 'l iU Date: ~ ~ ~ ~i PROJECT ADDRESS:_ ~ ~ ~' 4 5~ -~~~"; "` ~ 'Y ~y j Applicant Name: .1 h i 1 "~ :-, ~ (~:~, ( r l i Application Number:_ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ . Staff and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property.. Regardless of the opinion expressed below, you reserve the right to amend your opinion at a Zater.date during *he actual public review and appeut periods. ~My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I do 1V®T have any concerns or issues which "need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. ^My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of wor ~ and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are.the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Neighbor Name: C~ A'~ Y ~"A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ Neighbor Address: t~~3~ P~-u~.A-~~ s~~~~ ~~ Signature: Neighbor Phone #: (~ ~~ T ~ ~ ". ~~ `7~ ~~: ~~ un~~ ~~Y NISH/MD~o • I~ • {~ L' • • ~- ARBC,~ RESOURCES ` Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care • A TREE INVENTORY AND REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED NEW RESIDENCE AT 14345 SPRINGER AVENUE SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA OWNER'S NAME: MALLADI APPLICATION #: 04-068 Submitted to: Community Development Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 Prepared by: David L. Babby, RCA Registered ConsultingArborist #399 Certified Arborist #WE-4001A April 6, 2004 P.O. Box 25295, San Mateo, California 94402 • Email: arborresources@earthlink.net Phone: 650.654.3351 • -Fax: 650.654.3352 • Licensed Contractor #796763 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist Apri16, 2004 SUMMARY • The proposed project exposes four trees regulated by City Ordinance to potential damage. They include three Coast Redwoods (#1-3) and one London Plane (#4). All trees are shown to be retained. Tree #1 is a relatively young and small Coast Redwood. By implementing the proposed driveway/walkway design, the vast majority of the canopy's north and west sides will require removal to achieve adequate driveway and walkway clearance. As a result, the canopy will become severely distorted. To avoid this from occurring, the driveway and walkway should be designed no closer than 10 feet from the tree's trunk or the tree should be relocated elsewhere on site. All other trees will be impacted at tolerable levels provided the recommendations presented in this report are carefully followed and incorporated into construction plans. The combined value of the inventoried trees is $6,800. Per City Ordinance, a 100% bond is required to promote their protection. INTRODUC'T'ION The City of Saratoga Community Development Department has requested I review the potential tree impacts associated with the proposal to demolish an existing single-family residence and build a new one at 14345 Springer Avenue, Saratoga. This report presents my findings; provides protection measures; identifies each tree's condition, species, size and suitability for preservation; and presents tree appraisal values. Data compiled for each inventoried tree is presented on the table attached to this report. Plans reviewed for this report include Sheets Al thru A9 (by Glush Design Associates, dated March 2004) and Sheet 1 (by Advanced Development, dated 3/27/04). A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan (Sheet 1) is attached and shows each tree's location, number and canopy perimeter, as well as the recommended location for protection fencing. Trees #2 thru 4 are not shown on plans reviewed. Though their trunks are located on neighboring properties, they were inventoried for this report as they are vulnerable to root damage. Please note their locations have been plotted on the attached map and should not be construed as being surveyed. As the trunks of trees #2, 3 and 4 are located on neighboring properties, I was unable to measure their diameters at the time of my inspection. • Malladi Residence, 14345 Springer Avenue, Saratoga Page I of 3 City of Saratoga Community Development Department David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist Apri16, 2004 • RECOMD~NDATIONS 1. Tree protection fencing must be installed prior to any demolition, excavation, surface scraping, grading or heavy equipment arriving on site. It shall be comprised of five- to six-foot high chain link mounted on two-inch diameter steel posts (galvanized), driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 12 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection.. It shall be established precisely as shown on the attached map and placed no further than four feet from the proposed basement wall. Fencing for tree #1 is not shown on the map but must be established as per recommendation #4 below. 2. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the fenced -areas (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but aze not limited to, the following: grading (soil fill and excavation), surface scraping, trenching, storage and dumping of materials, and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 3. Where within 15 feet of tree #4's trunk,-great Gaze must be taken to avoid digging beyond two feet from the proposed basement wall. 4. One of the following options should be implemented for protecting tree #1: a. Redesign the proposed driveway and walkway to be no closer than 10 feet from the tree's trunk. Tree protection fencing throughout demolition, excavation and • construction must be established no further than 9 to 10 feet in all directions. --or-- b. Relocate the tree to another location on site and show the new location on future landscape plans. The transplant work must be performed under the guidelines and direct supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified azborist. A drip-type watering system shall be installed with the amount and frequency determined by the retained azborist. The work should be performed prior to commencing any development activities; otherwise, protective fencing shall be established 10 feet from the trunk in all directions until the work does occur. After the tree is relocated, fencing shall be established outside its entire canopy. 5. Any new underground utilities should be designed outside from beneath the trees' canopies and reviewed for tree impacts prior to approval. Existing underground pipes or lines beneath the canopies should remain buried and cut off at existing soil grade. 6. During the months of Mazch thru October, supplemental water shall be supplied to trees #1 and 4 throughout the entire construction process.. The suggested rate is 10 gallons of water per inch of trunk diameter applied every two to three weeks. The water should be supplied using soaker hoses placed on the existing soil surface at approximate mid-canopy. 7. The location of each inventoried tree shall be shown on all site and landscape plans. i~ Malladi Residence, 14345 Springer Avenue, Saratoga Page 2 of 3 City of Saratoga Community Development Department David L. Babby, Registered Coruulting Arborist Apri16, 2004 8. The disposal of harmful products (such as chemicals, .oil and gasoline) is prohibited anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath canopies. Herbicides/pesticides used beneath canopies must be labeled for safe use neaz trees. 9. I recommend the Swale proposed beneath tree #4's canopy be no deeper than three to four inches beneath existing soil grade. 10. The proposed irrigation design should be reviewed for tree impacts prior to approval. Irrigation trenches planned pazallel to a trunk shall be no closer than 12 times the diameter of the closest trunk. Irrigation trenches installed radial to a trunk can be placed no closer than 5 times the diameter of the closest trunk and at least 10 feet apart at the canopy's perimeter. Where this is not applicable, adrip-type system shall be placed on top of existing soil grade. 11. Irrigation should spray away from and no closer than three feet from the trees' trunks. Stones, mulch or other landscape features should be at least one-foot from trunks. 12. The pruning of trees must be performed under supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist and according to standards established by the- ISA. Information regazding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained by referring to the following website: http://www. isa-arbor. com/arborists/arbsearch. html. TREE PROTECTION BOND The combined appraised value of inventoried trees planned for retention equals $6,800. 1n accordance with the newly adopted Ordinance, a bond equivalent to 100% of this value is required to promote their protection. The appraised tree values shown on the attached Tree Inventory Table aze calculated in accordance with the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9`j' Edition, published by the International Society of Arboriculture, 2000. Attachments: Tree Inventory Table Copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan (Sheet I ) • • • Malladi Residence, 14345 Springer Avenue, Saratoga Page 3 of 3 City of Saratoga Community Development Department ARBO"' RESOURCES ' Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care • TREE INVENTORY TABLE . a.a ~,~ . ~ ~ ~ 3 3 r ~ y '" . ~ i~ ~ i~ a ~ a o '~ '~ ~ ~ a `" v o `«+ o Q ~ ~ 3 ~ '~ q ~ . ~ U W m fYa ' U ~' ~ ~ c c ~ a~ o~ a REE ~ ~ ,~~. ~ ~ =~ ~ ~ ~ ~' b c ~ x ~ o p, JO TREE NAME ~ ~ d0 pp ~p ~ a~ ~ O Oa ~ ~ V ~ ~ . t-+ x U 'x rn O ~ ° A C A H 1 Coast Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 9.5 25 20 100% 100% Good High - - 1 - $1,780 2 Coast Redwood (Sequoia sem irens) 11 40 20 100% l00% Good High X X 3 - $1,920 3 Coast Redwood (Sequoiasempervirens) 11 40 20 100% 100% ('food High X X 3 - $1,920 4 London Plane Tree (Platanusacerifolia) 18 40 35 _75% 50% Fair High X X 2 - $1,180 lr ~ u i~ Site: 1434SSp~Avamt, S®afoga Prtpmedjor. CFty ofS~amge Comr~urnily Dewdopnie~t Dept Prepmrd by: Da-id L Bobby, RCA April 6, 2004 - __. _. _. N ~ ~ r $ite Address: 14345 Springer Avenue, Saratoga I . ~ ~ P~ppared for:.City of Saratoga Community Developmrnt Department 1 UNDSCAPING ' Q Notes: Map identifies four trees of Ordinance siu. ' No - - °~ ~ Canopy perimeters are approximate. _ _ 2.0 ~i - Map ila9 Vern reduced in SIZ_e BIId 13 not t0 SCale. ~ CONFORM TO - G Ex GRADE Sy,A i/ per: April b, 2004 . ,, ~ ~ ,~ I ~ C y 'J %• 1 ~' m,~r.~ , / ~' sz`~ 1 ,_ ;'_' -ems ~' '~''~,0 2 ~; _ \ '"~. it ' N /~ :.a, , ~~O° F • ~y/(,~\yc.` ` ~+ "I2+(Y,'~ v = W y~ ~'~ s~y r, ~~ ~:ryazl SOD ~. y~s~~__ e7~CF ..~ r ! - - ~t?: :p~ :~ ~avrc 8 f'FNrvC'~ra.,q„~~ Z TREE PROTECTION FENCING ., ' /,~..Y _ 1,:~" +. - g • rt+c ,w b ~ e O ~ p / N`. ~ , \~ v - of y 4. yl ~ C--, fi a $ ~ 2w moo. ~~ \ (~ / ~~ ' ~ ~ \ ~~ o: ~ /~ ~ 'r t 200 .~ .f- °P 7 / to y' ,,,~,-,, b aC c 4 S n/. 4 ~ ~ 1 yry •0,t~ ry:' Ewen o, p° 6 a ~ ~ _p tee. 4 ' C /i" ' ~ .r.• ~ h / 7 \Jp . :s-rx3 // d ~ ''» eax J / ~ l ~~'rr ~ ~ yCYy 99.30 ~' '- x'a't~ \~1-~ / //~" ?~0 ~' ~iao.n~ j!~C W ~ ~ ' I).;IT;; .)c 39. p \.t't". fs >'4-~/ \ ;i''~' iSNF~ORMa /~' ,.i / MM ~ WOOD FENCE . ~ ~ a~~o ~ v / // N>o7?t~~'A~ '•CONFORM ~ /~;.:' / f ~ '~.~' ~ QO w~r\ F.S. 99./16 \ Imo/ ..~Q„~ i ?3?~~,G / ~~~°-°'•° CI ~ O ~ ~~ ~,~ Prepared By: / / 32, AS SHOWN UPON CERTAIN ~C ARBOR RESOURCES THE MARY SPRINGER TRACT ?o- ~ Projasalonal ArOorlerltunl ConsalNng d Traa Gre ~ • D H.E. SAGE', YNiICH NAP WAS 47i OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA P.O. Box 23295 • Sen Mateo. CA •94402 35 IN BOOK K OF MAPS, AT ~\ ~, Phone: (650) 654-3331 • Finail: arhorresaura~a ddutk.oet _ . \\y//i % / .7 Attachment 5 • • • .7 ~ a ~ ~ u- ~ 0 ~ ~ \- y` ~°. 2 m N ~ ~0 o I d q ~~ ~r1 i ZZOL-B821BM):~!! 9991-B9L ~BOb):Vd oaise ~ •mar ~s w+a dawnwi uss aunmsuo~ v ugsa0 eu~ ~epiw~wa0 yapwWSey i ~~ ai ~ ~ ~ 1t1 ~ ~ I .a - $Og / LL ~ W /-..., ~ ` ~ LL.tt~ C.O C ~ ~ CV ~ ' c7 I ~ 1 Q' ~j Q (LL] ~7LLQ1 ¢ Z¢ V ~ fA f!j ~~~LL777 ~ of ~ t7j ? fTj Z ui (A V+ ~ 1~ 2 !1~! Upl ~+ (~ O ~ J ~ o Y> ~ ~ ~ mNtQig ~ x J~9 rp~~~ a o~o J_ ~ ~ ~. ~ s a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i w. ~ ~ dV N ~~~~ '" ~ W ~ ~ ~ Q =~ E- ` wW ~ `~ ~ i z ~ ~; t 2 ~~ ~ Z - U Z ~ ~ g~z J o 7 ~ ~ a ? 's~ ~~$ ~~ B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~`. ~~ o~g zz Ua W ~~d ~ ~LL~~ -~ ~ z Z ~ ~ ~ t E~~~ z ~zJO'~zgOOZ ~iLZ~aHF= C7 ? ~ Q ~ ~v ag 9 9 `¢ I~ uia1= xa ~ ~~gQ n :off ~ °°d E~ t c7 a ~g a ~ i' j ~ s i~ ~ O_ > > F- ~ W ~ MY LL 5 LL 1 p ~ J ~ N ~ W ~ N ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ > . i ~ ~ Q > W fn O - Q 2 N O W ' - 2S W Q J J W U fA lL (A m {L W W C4 r N M ~' In 10 n ~ O~ (7 ~ - - - ~ p~ oZ ,' aZZ f 6 x~x O ~ U ~ ~ O ~ ]C ~ ~ O 1 ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ -I ¢ ~ ¢ < ~ ~ p_ 1 F n ° u dz Q ~ Q W d rL ~ ;. ~ ( ~ 5 ~ ~ ,. i' N < rn ~ ~- .~ ~~ ~~ a •~ Q 4 ~~~' ~ ~ ~ p ~ . a 'c ~ ~ ~ _~ w Q ~ ~ ~$ x I ~~ ~~s7 gy O ~ O ~~ a~ ~ .q~ ~ -. ~ H ~ ~ ~ ~ - M LL~! u 3 J O Z m y ~ ~ ~m~~ .5 I .$:~ ~ ~~~ 8 e 3 f~ a { d a~ ~ ~.~~ _ ` /" ~ ~ W w W O v $ ~ < ~ ~ a a ~ - ~ . ~ ~ ~ - J, 3 ~ F ~ ~ Y O c7 7 ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ 6 a ~• o. Y p a..~ !. o ~q 6 ' .~s•; ~D ~ ~ ~ ~ v i w m w Gi ~ m ¢ o ~ O p ~ p w J w p ¢ b~ ~ 63~F ~ 1"' X .~ ~ , '.~y'd ~~ 8. ~.a ~~ ;~< ~ ~ ~J j u i nl ~i O W W cl m m ¢ u^~ S U Z~ w W O °z ~ g ~ i w ~ _ ~ x - ~ ¢ Z W ~ Z ~ ~'tf ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~•.~. ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~. ° 3 ? m ~ a ~ a v ~ LL o vii N z ¢ LL •00~~0'oo~c~c~~~ ~~-~~~~ o . ,_. -- G~ d ~ ~"'~ ~ ¢ O ~3 w ~ ~ w w °° ¢`~`nw w ~ ~ ~ W 0 Q > ~mW7 N p~ ¢ LL 4r1t7~ ¢ ?~ <o r_il UO 'J` mmp W Q~, LL¢ Z W ¢ppZ Wp~W~~ p$ GO' Q W LL¢2 ¢FWp Z A (~ ~ w ~ ;wm33w`~gv¢°OfW~w4a>3r°-n~w ¢ ¢~lux?z?z wg ~ 11~~ J ~ ~ m 8¢ ~imN~93~ 9N zjzp~z°.a¢$i pamo~-Jr5o~ 4a¢inyF'~~>3 33g¢3c}7~~~c~zpoUa a~¢ ~~~=Z W ~ `~L,1' \J ~ Q . ti t >m o~LLU ~ N 1~1 N J w LL 3 LL m ~HO SU Da O~°°~3 jm -¢)U wp JJ ¢<WQ LL ~~3 y~l6m ¢¢~m~~~>333¢3o=~~C7z OO pa pia 2¢du. ~uu mo ~m x? ~ ' ` " ' ` V . , ~ (v- P~'-1 . • r^ O 1• N H W . ~ ~~ ~ ~ ¢ ~ W ~° ~ ~ a v - ~ ~ 1rl ~ ~ z o IiJ,, ~~o~ ~ M 7 0 V z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ,~w, . V1 .~ U j U O `~ '' _ , ~ . Z U Z ~ ~ ~ ~ Fes" W ~ ~ > C ~ ~ W U Q • • ~~ // ~~ d1 - - -. .. 7 ~ 'w v1 , r ~ , } . a ` ~ `r . W " $,.. lu~r ,.~ ~_$ .~ t ~fF ~ f ~ ~ ,~ , 5 ~ I~"9 ~ n j .~c~~~~ i ~\~~ ~._ , ~,f7~~;~,' ~ ~. i E t. Iii o ~ G "`..: I f)- . ~ r~ I '~ t. ~ ~j f ! ~ ~ ~ 1 x jj d ~ X47 ~ ~ - 1 r ` t - ~ ' 4 \ ~~ ~ V c K 1 ~ t ~ ` . i~t ~ ~ .~~~~ `~` t-~ ~ Q~ - .~aP r - -- 'mot- = - I c ~ i; '-~ ~ " Q!. d~ 'VJO1t/dVS 'SONIMYtl0333N1 AB NNlOHS SNdLONW ONY w sNO)sN3voa3NiWOedsNOUrrtnnANVdoa3mioN '3A~d ~13JN1~idS S"b£'bL ~_ 3S 15f1W 3ddd0 SIHL ONY 8O1'3NI NO SNdLON00 L~IUrJ ONY SNOISN31V0 TY110d 3lSISNOdS3N 38 ONY'AiIN3A ° °w w O T- m IlYHS 6HOl0YN1NO0 ~N01SN3W10031Y'JS U3A03d1303J3Hd ~ o w ~ ~ ¢ ~ I m i ~ ~ 3AYN T'IYFiS SONVnWO 3S3HL NO NdSN3W10 N3111NM e3r~is3a3~uAeN3,u~siNass~Wn3dss~rmNO~ IQVI'1VW 'S~IW $' HW =~13NM0 °" _ ~ ~' ~ m LL 03LYdONlSY 1430X3 LJ3fOtld ANY tlOd 03$(1 JS lON AC ° AYW tl3NdS30 3HL d0 A1tl3dOtld 3H13HYSJNIMYtl0353H1 ~ ~ O ~ ~ O j` ~ ~ p V i • • • is ~ ~`" .s9NlMVaa as~u xe raeoNS sNOUIoNm aNV d9 ° r° ° ~ zzoz-aez oeoro :=9r o seal-eaz (zor) :va sNO1sN3wla 3FLL waa~ svouvlavn urv do a3i~iioN °r~d ~j~®rNJpCld~ flG~ 6 ~ 02TS8 '°~ ° f °5 F+Q HP!+ili+°N Z6S8 = 38 15fW 371dd0 SINL aNV 90P 3NL NO SNOI11aN0~ I ° e !71~a°J 8 uHpnO HuTPN~9 ivl°+ammo3 ~ry}~uapTeaa == QNV SNOISN3WIa 'I'M'MOa 31915NOd53J 30 acrd ~J.d1213n ~' \ I ~o5~ pp~i~ ~a I~~ g s saoiova>.Nm'NOISN3wla m-rvx a3no aoN3a~3aa p~ °~' °~3'~I~ t~3° ° ~`a'1Lw1 =L'Jz7(Wi~'u~10 O N I a7211LtlV~d®J~S~ C~~II~~® 1N~8 9 lod a 3ndH lldW' S9NIMlMa 3S3f11 NO NOISTi~~la N311RA1 213rl91S7a 3N1 J.9 N3n19 51 NOISSIW"^ • 553~Nf1 N03213Ff ~ T7 ^ n O n n n n nO~~ 5 n a31VOlaN1 Sd ~d30X3 1'J3t'oad lNV MOJ a3sn 39 10N 0 0 ~ u a ~ I m'N9153o 3H1 d0 J,1213dOad 3N1 3Md 55MIMV1la 263Fi1 ~~ ~ d• E9 a W ~j O ~:' E, I \ / rxi~ W ~° DL A U ~ U x ~ N \ O O S~ 0 I N~~ nw ~aW d3 d3 7 Z ~~6~ a~ 3s~ ~ ~ one \~ J6 !l 1 J ~ ~Lj LL ,y0 d- '~ ~m°w H`> ~~ V J ~~ ~\ .~ ,~O ~` r o~ d3 M \~ \ \ \ Gee No V u ~ = a nm+~ ,\ • um~ ,\ .~ a~. O \~~ \ h ~~ ~~~/J4~~ hU ~ i VeU~2 ,~ \\ \ \ - 6g ~ ~ \ ~ 8Z S/ ~ ~~~ .o° N/ ~o {~ 2 t~ m mo m ~O + ~'~ „ c? T ~ ^ ~ 2 0 3~ U S io ~. m`` m m+~ 1 PEE G agx ~~ . ° ! +o ~~' / (9 ~~ #~P"'~ Q ~~ ~b ~~ y~J Jy d O ~. ~g~3 100.81 PATIO In ~ Q ~ Z W +om Ul ~ fn W m O N ~ ~ ~•~ ~IYU~ (~) ~\ .~5~ \ `\~ `\ ~ << ~\ \\ \ a ~ ~\ ~\ ~\ .\ ,\ ~ ~\ .~ .~ > ~~~~ .,. ~~cc-~~ \ Yld, °s 4io, lJ ~~ aw d ooh o~`y~ ~j ~~y,' /~ \ ~\ s~ •~ '~ d '~ ~ '~ a: \ \ "+ o~ ~ '~ .~ ;~ ~~ ~~ o~ .,~ ~ '~ =~ ~ ~~ o ~ \ \ /~, \ \ ~~. 1 a+~ + o ~ ~ ^a ®~ _ ~~s~ . 6 .oo~os °°~ ~+ g ~ - a a~ o0 6 W ~ 3N1~'~a3do~~ _ _ -'~~.'.DO.b[.ti~N 00 Or N3~ oM No~N .9 I Z ~ ~ ~~ 3N1j s ~0~ aon,3j~oM ~ ~a3d0y~ 3N17~1d3~.~~.bt.b[N k9i l ~ H .s M.,oo Zz oCti ~ 6g \ 0~ ~ ~ 6g .10~ Z ~ ~ ~~~ / ~ ~~ o,o '~,~\ h V~ n O 2 = ~ ~60~ Q J ~ J J ,~0 ~~ d ° `\ 3 ~ ~~' 69 , «, o J0~ • • • I- 7-- - ~55NIM'd21G 3541 ,l9 NMOHS SNOIlION00 CWV i j , I i ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ y ~ - j ~ ~ ~ O _ i ~ ~; I I I ~ __ 2Z02a 892 (cBOiv ~sv3 ~ 5991-99Z (BOi) ~4d OZ[SB 7 a o~ ag !.~ aHP!~S»oN ZLSB H !T!nasso~ g u8!ca0 Halp!!ng !aw~amo!o~ !a!luap!cag /~~~!I I!~\~ - .-" !ilk`, =_ S31VI~OSSb' NJIS3a HSf1lJ - eli SNOISN3WI4 3H1 W021~ SNOIIVITJV/~ JNd ~O 431~I1ON 39 15lW 301~d0 SIHl CNV 90f 3H1 NO SNOIIICAJO~ 4NV $NCI5N3d14 'ITd 'MOB 31915NOd5?J 39 4NV 'J.d1213h HS STJOlOV2LLN07 'NOISN3WI0 G3Td05 213A0 30N30373Ld 3hdH TIdHS 59NIMb'210 353N1 NO NOISN3WI0 N3LLITJM _ ~I i C I !r',~ i i I 2i3N91534 ~Il A8 N3AI9 SI NOKSIW?J3d 5531Nl1 N03T13N 031VOI4NI Sb 1d37X317~'OTJd NIV ?lOd ~dl 3910N W L3N91534 3HL ~O J.L?J3c10?Jd ~dl 321V SSNIMb'2N] 353H1 s s'PO,J 3 0 ,\ i VO 'VJO1Vat/S i ~ I ! F i •ane aaoNiads stis~~ ~ . ~ ;~ W I ~Q I ~,i oho C~ ~ ~ iav~-row •saw ~• aw :aarunno ~d;~ IQw ~-~I ~,z iW N i - Om ~UIQ~INmp !S 3woH woisno !" ~~ ~i., ~ o o R~{ Y ~ 0 r 1' 13{11 tlml r N dl Ul S/~hW / Q _ .. ;s~,4o_ z Y ~Ia°~Omm Q Q Gee ~~ ~.n*, J / \~ \ \ Y~ ~~ V. IL Pq \ `\ ~ W /\ 3`. ~`~ o+ `~. \ \ - ms \ ! t:r~ Q ~ `\ \r~ \~~ \ Y~~ O 0 •~~ os ~\ -_ _~~_~-. rye- __ d3 ~o ~ e,N ~ s. _Z J_ m A 6.. 0'~ IN O ~MMM~I~>a!o k ~~ ~V> iZ ~/de ryo I ~~°~ N~ .\ i ~~O 69 - W - ~I 8Z ~0~ I <~z \ w ! ~ ~ OAT ~rs! ~ \ ~~ \ `-/' ~ + S ! $ \ .\ d ! I ~ ~ ~; \ b c ,~ t ~ q '~,W ~ s :a ~ ~.W °a ~ N 1 ~p le~°Yo O~liil \ ~ ~ ~ oY ~ 0~,, ~~ r~ .Dq~~p ~ry •Q9 x ~ N~ ~I i ~ ~ \ Q ~~ '' 4 ~\ ' \ oo =I • ~ t ~~ • . ~`~ Q 0 ~- 3NIl ,11~3d02id 69 - W - ~I 6Z 10~ 69 - W - ~ 0~ 10~ 1 69 - W - ~I l ``' ~° N !CV W to a iz °~ a z Q 3a J ~ o ~ ~ C m~ ~ °og o Z ~ ~ ' Q - + r3UN3~ DOOM H01 ~~ ~ ,00.06 3„OO,ti l.b LN !! ~,, 3NIl J.1?13d021d ~ r 3Nil J.1b3d0ad ,0~ ~ ~ ~,\ ` ~~ ,00'01 ~ `M„OO,ZZ.OLN I OUOM HOIH .9 69 - W - ~i z~ 10~ dH AG T'S'c.'G]'1y .i0, - B~+ iG: ~Sd]:n3] C/l9-dB C-C„,Ed-713;xB~ ~DcI l3(`U5[Sd~ [N 9002 L! ~BD ~D1 OE ~~n rd1 OkB~31IB-%%f•,SNad-^n`~ ~CDZ`~s~;IB.v_"•.a~~an.as~;~ r m N Z 0 N w 'S9NIMdMa 353N1 AA NMOHS SNOLLIaN00 aNd t/J `VDO1V>:IVS SNOISN3<-lla 3H1 WOMB SNOLLdITIdh ,W'd d0 a31dIlON ' wy ~+ ~y ZZOZ-B9Z (. OI) ~x°! / S99 L-B9Z (@O-) ~Yd = ~~/\V ~~~NIdd~7 ~y~l• OZISB 'O~ f uo5 o•lip oBPVi4HON ZL59 - ~ 15lW 3'JI350 SINL aNd 90I' 3NL NO 5NOI11aN0'J 6uillnsuo~ ; uB~cop fiulPll°B lopiowwop '~opuoplsoy a =_ aNV SNO15N3W1a TIV 'clod 3iel5NOd53a 39 aNd 'JdIM3n IaVrIIVUY 'SHW '8' HW ~H3NM0 szlolovxuNm MoISNSWIa a3ldos a3no aoN3a3~3ad S31t/IJOSSt/ NrJIS3a HSf1lJ 3~d1+~~dHS ~FuP11MVMa 3s~u No Nolsr,3<-pa N3lllra.~ 'M3N9153a 3111. A9 N3I~19 51 NOISSIWM3d 553'INfI N03M31i ~ ~ O. ^ ~ O ^ ~ w w 031d71aNl Sd Id37X3 1031'OMd ,Wb' MOd 035(1 3A J.ON „ 1 "J M3N9153a 3H1 d0 JLLM3dOMd 3N1 3Md 59NIMYMa 353N1 A A9 LL I I ~ y " v I I I I ~ I i ~~ I I = - 1~i. ~~i / I ~ I I _~ _ I ~g~ I ~ ~ ~i I I j ~5 I~ n I ~ - - I I~ ~ 0 I i ~ ~\~ I ~ . i J , I ~ I I ~ /( I `--- -~ I/ I ----- ~ I - ~ ~ i IV Ta = I I .IO I ~ ~ a I~ I I a I ~- I I I I I I I p~ I I ~ I I I ------ I o 1 u I I ~ i ~ I ~ I ~ r~ ~a~ ~ --+ -- - - - I - m ~ \ go ' I I _ _ _ - . I 6 ~ I ~ I I j ~ a ~ 0~ I I ~ I o~ o I - ~ --~ I I I I . ~ I I. ~- - \ I I I I I ~ \ - , I o I I - I ~~ \ I I~ I I I I I I I 1 , _ - z I I F d) I I I I I I I I ~ I m I ~ I I - l I I I , I I I ~ - _ - - I , I I I I I I - - ~ sg i _ - ~ I ~ I I n - I L_ __J _ f° a Z ' 4 1-- A A9 3 d o Y F o O .. __~ w II o = W M r- ~~ o u~ =~ U aW o~ U~ ,~\ m o \4 = ~•I 0 • • • m ~ t a ~ G yI Z ~ \ I~ h u_i ~9 _ zzoz-99z (nor) ~xo,{ /~s99t-H9Z (80-) ~4d Bul9nsuo158 •o~ o~ uo5 ^I+U ~BPN41+oN iLS9 ~ ; u61sa4 BulPlln9 lolwwwo~ •lol~u~plcay ~s9N9MNQ Hsu A9 rueoNS swoulalm a+v SNOISN3dl0 3N1 1iONd SNOLLYINYh ANY d0 031dLLON 3B 15f W 3~IfJ0 SINL ONY 9q' ail NO SNOIlIONO~ aNY srolsN~la rlv ~ a~alstlodsaa as aNV'A31xsi. TIYNS 6MOlOY2LLNO~1NO15M3WIQ ~Td05 M3M 30N303J3Nd 3nHF1 lTdkiS 59NIMY1lQ 353LL NO NOIST13WIa N3LLN9A T~i9Kr70 ~i1 A8 t8h19 51 NOISSIW213d SS]~UI N03L~1 031YOIOW S'o' 1d3J)f3103'O?Jd ANY MOd 035f1 381ON A.Yw a~ls3a ~u do ua~oad ~u aaY sxa9.+Yxw ~u VO 'b-E)O1Va~IS '3AV a3JNlads 5b£ti4 latrl~w -saw 's• aw :aaNnno 3WOH WO1Sf10 i ~ r 1 I ~ I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ we 1 - 1 I I ~ I I ~~ - ~ I I a1 ~ ~ I o I ---- ~ ~ \ ~ ~ A _ =U I we 1 ~ a ,• ~~~~ I I nn I I ~ - l-J 4~~ / ~ - i a9 o I ~ I I o~ I r ~ i ~ ~'1^ I~ O Q.~~ i LJI J L-1(~/\ I I ~ .- I ~----~ I I_ i----------~ ~ ~ I I ~ I r-----I J ~ I I I ~~ I I I I ~ . _~ n I I I -~ i I 111 I ~ I ~y I I V I I ~ I = f I~/------ ---- I I _, I I I I r----~ I I ------------ Id I 1 I I- I .~ ------ -------, I- I, I __ I I I I ~~ I ~ I I I I I i ~ ~ 1_ i m I I L--~-- I 1 ~-- -J I I nd I I __ J f- - I I I •I I O I I ~~ I I ~~ ~ i 1 1 O I 1 I - I I I I I I \' ~ ~ I - I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 L-----'--------------------~ w< • • QQ W V ~ N 0 .. I it p ti ~ y=j W Km =l:1 aW O? < N m ~ ~ N 0 u \ ~ 4 0 I ~I m o ~ ~, rc SSNiM'd210 3~JFr LL A9 tA40H5 SNOLLI@!OJ ONd ZZOZ-99Z (90Y) ~•^! / 5991-99Z (9pt) ~4d SNOISd3.110 3H1 WOild SNOLLdRfdA .Wd d0 C731~LLON OZtS6 'off vsop uo5 o•I~p eppNyNoN ZLS9 - 39 157W 3010 SINi ONd 801' 31f1 NO $NOI110N00 fiul~lncuo~ g u6lcop BuIP6n8 lolyawwo~ •lopuaplccy a =_ ONd STlOISN3WIQ lTd '2bd 3'1915NOd53M 30 OMl '.yIN3n 5il017d2LLN00 °NOISN3W10 03'1V'JS b3n0 30N30303Tld S31dI~OSSt/ NCJIS34 HSf1~J ~`~ r'~ 59PlIA4d210 353F11 No NolsN3wla N3ul~! 2I3h191S30 3N1 A9 N3h19 51 NOISSIWir3d 553'RYI N03L13N 031dOlONI 5`d 1430X3 173f'OTJd J.NV bOd 43=.!i 39 lON a~lsaa 3vu ~o uaadaad alu aad 59NINIVLa asaru VO `VE)OlVa~o/3 •anv aa~ruiads 5ve~ ~ ~afn~e-w •saw 's• aw :aawu+o 3WOH WO1Sf10 ~. A A9 _ I I ~~ I j ~ ;~ ~ `. r----- ~ 1 I ~ I ~ i ~ I I • Q I ~ ~ ~ O Y~ I I I , I ~ I m ~ l~ m I ~ ~ ~ i d i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ J ` ~I I I I ~ ~ - - I I ~ . ~ I I ~ ~ I I I I I I I _ I i ~ - I I I r---- I 1 I I I ~ I I -- I I _- ~ J I J I I -, I I I I I I ~ I I ~ I I . I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I ~ I I ~ ~ I I ~ I I - J I I d I I ~ I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I - L - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ as .Q F A A9 r Z 3d ~w Yo o ~ o Li -I ~ ~ l O Z `'' ~ ~ rn K m W~ U G Z V e ~ m ~ 2 ~ 0 • • • r ~ m Q' ~ q ~ .~ ~ \ \ o ~ ~ r ~ rc W I /f ( \. ~ \~ '~ V ®~ ° ------ k s ~~- -~ r-----1 / a~ e~ r~ ~------J ~--- \ I \ I ^ ~ _ Q -- -, o a I - _ ~~ ~a w ~ i 1- I ~ I = I ~ ~ I ~ - --~ i Q~4. I L, - I 111 ~ t!- ~ I \ ~ I I 111 „I~ ~\\ ~L ~ i I I 'i'd ~~ _ _ % ~l o I 111 \ _-I-, ~/ 1 111 ~, n JI v^ ~ ~ I 1 ~ i I '~ I ~ ~ 1 % iyI I r A9 I L=- ---- ~ J /~ ~'~I I II \\\~~/ L~\\\ ~/ JI ~ I I 111 ~ ~ i ~-. _ ~ ~~~` ~; ~ A9 I III II ~' /~`~ ~ \ O ~ I I ~ F"- I I . ~ ~ ~~~~\ ~ i m i I 11 ~~ o~ ~I ~ ~ I ~~ ~ I r p i l'llII ~ ~L j a I 7`-- ~~ ~ II I ~~ I Ir -~ II I /e ~----~ 11 _ T II .rn F' m I ,III 1L =___ - II \~ I I 'n /~~'~ I I I I I I ~ I I III ~ `LL II II ~ i I 111 m~ I II IIIT i~/ I 111 ~ I ~ j I 111 ~ 0~ I ~ III r------ ~ I I,LII ms II I~ II1~ 1 I ryl ~ I II 1 's-i I iF - I~ I Qdl II II II I as I I I I I ~ I I --J II I ~ i ----~ it ~ II U ----- II I i I~---------- -~L - I --n- I I r---------- - L}_ I a~~ ~ - -- I II ~'~~ ill i 1 ~ ,~ ,gyp W ~ I _I I -ill ~I - d'~~ ~I I - e I ~~~)) I ~ -1 ~~\ iII ~ ~~~ ili I s~ _ - I ~1 o in ~ ~ iii ~ III lyt ~ ~ i1i i I ° ~= I I , ~I - - I (L--- ------ I ~ r--- u Ipi I I .e-, ~ I I II ~ ~ Ili I I ~ II III I I ~I III I I I ~ 111 I I ® II III I ~~ II 111 I o I I --j I Q I I ~= I I 1 ---1 it II II, --- i'r~.' i I I i I~ i I Ip~'~ I I ~ II --- I I^ I 1 -----Il--- I i ~y -~\ ---- I u~ I n I v I ra~ ~ o ~ i /9d~ I ~ VJ 'VOOlVtlt/S z2az-892 :80t) .x.i /~u9t-89Z (801) ~vd - •ssNSdvaa as~u xe NMONS sNOLL~oo aNV ST1015N~Ji0 3Nl W021d 430LLVIaVA J.NV d0 O31dI1QJ •3AV a3~JN~aas 9bEb ~ OZ 158 'off •of •05 . 0 •BPYNV~N ZL59 3615(W 3010 SIHL °NV 90I' 3LL NO 5NOI110N0~ s~nm:~•~ ~ ~el••a Bwan~e low•W W°~ 9ou~wl••e ' a+v sNOls~m~+la rv ~ ~alsNOds3a 3a aNV'»Ixan _ a ~Ta1i5 S7lOlOVMW00 MOISN3WI° LflT'OS ~O 3JN3®0321d S31t/IOOSSV NJIS3a HSf1lJ 3^~ „dNS ~~ ~ NO NOISN3WIa N31Ln~ ~aK ' • • ~ zaN91S30 ~i1 .l6 N3FI9 SI N0155h1iBd SS3"NO N03213i l iVY11 saw ~ aw a3NM0 a~vol°NI sv iaa7x~ lo~oxld JNV ao~ msn ae 3cN ~ Y ~ O u ,/~, O~~ ~ V ~~ 0 = W O o .J ~' Z W IS/1 ~W ~ W . . Q II W • Q Q K m O w 2~ v Q W ~~ ~ ~+ ~ O N 0 • • • m 'n Z `tl~ In O Z N h \ ~ ~. ~ 'S9NRM}iC 353HL A9 MAOFiS SNOLLI@l00 ONV ZZOZ-o 9Z o907) :xoi / 5991 ~9Z (B06) ~4d = SNOISN3r110 X11 HOLd SNOLLYRNn ANY d0 ®IdLLON 8ullinc~e~ g el.e u u.S .nNO • VM4VeN ZLS9 = __ 3815YIW 3010 61N1 @1Y 9!X' 3LL NO SNOLLIONOO u 0 IPllnfi lele+•u+u+u~ •loliu•Pl~oa a = ONY SVOISN~110 •1"N '?lOd 31914VOd5321 39 ONV •A~IL3A ll`a'f16 SYOlOYMW00 T70151841U 031Y'Yv ZHAO 37N3O377Md S31dI~OSSd NJIS3a HSf1lJ 3^YN Try ssNllrsaa ~ ~ NOISN~na N311kM 'iFB191530 X71 A8 N3h19 51 NOISSIW213d Sr~7'9J0 NO~i O31V'AIONI SY l~OX3 1'.kil'OMd ANY TJOd Q3$(I 3910N AYW Ti3N9ir70 ~Il. d0 A1L3d021d 3LL 3fJY 59NQ./'.'MO 3536! V~ .'VOOlVd~dS '3Nf/ IJ3ON1lidS 9b£b4 IaVllb'W 'SLiW ~' tlW ~lJ3NM0 3woH wolsn~ r Z Q W V W~ o j~~ 11 2 ~ _ N W m O 0 =t] U a W ~~ Q N •d ~ ~ N 0 i ~I ~I I ~ al I ~I >tl ~' ~ I ~ ~ ~I I I ~ , u ~ ~ ~~sC ~3~ I ~I ~.a ~~~ I -~~ ~ ----____-- I me - ~ ~ , . ~~ I I I - _ - - _ - - - ~ - -~`-I° Q d I s I -I I }- - I ~ I ~ t gF _ r I I N ~ I ~~~ I I ~$ I ~ ~ I I ~~ ---------- I ~~ I ~ I ~ I I „~ ______--____ I I ~, I I ~ I I o s e~ I ~ I I I ~ ~ -~~ I II I I I I I I 11 's.,~ I I ~ I ~/ I I ~I I. .. -_______-__~ al I JL-----------~ I I I --11 I ~ I II I I II I I I ~ I II I I J i ~I I r I _J s I - ,m-.s -. I r -------- I I I ~I -- I _ -- -, . , - ~ f ~ I - -- - _ I _ - 3- I I I ~'~ d I I -----------a ti '1 9;~.~ I ---------- I - I I I ~ I I ~~ -, I I II I I ~ II I ® I ~~ J I I I I - -' I I I I i I ' ----------~ I I I I I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I I ~~ ~ I I I I bl _________-Ir - I ~~ i JJ 0 __-___-___-1 LL b IIAYII J~ ~I^ a~ I • II I I I n u '~ • • • m F~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ a z I'~ ® ,, id V ZZOL-89Z (BOY) :lP! :5991 ~9Z (BO-) 14d OZIS6 'off sop uoS 1+0 • PN4NON LL59 8ulllnauo~ y u81a•p Bu1P11^B lop~swwo~ }olluaplaay ~59NIMVaO 35311 A9 NMOHS SNOLLIONOO 0NV sNOls~13<•tla 3N1 woad sNOUVrovn ~m+ do a3ldlioN 3915lW 301dd0 5911 0NV 00P 3N1 NO SNOIL10N00 ONV SNOISH3W10 ~'IV'a6d 3?315NOdAa ~ 0NV 'Adla3n 'ITdFir 5a019Vl1W001NOKIHWIO Q3Td'JS 2F7n0 3'JN30373ad 3nVN ~T/N5 59N9AVa0 353!{1 NO N015N3WI0 N31LroM 2@191530 3N1 J.$ N3n19 SI N01551WL6d 553'pUl N03a3H a3lvolaNl sv la3~x3 ird^oad uro and a35n 39 lON Avw ?J3N91530 3H1 d0 ua3doad 3LL 3aV 69NIMWaO 35371 • -' ~ I bZ • I ~I ~I >tl SI I ~I ~~ I ~~. I I n~~ I I I I I +---____-- I I I I I I I N ~ ~ I ~~ I I I I ® I I ~ I ~~ I _ I I ~ I I I ~ I ~~ I I I °~~ ~/' . ~ I Ism,- I I J ~, 77~77,,,,,, I I I I I I I I I I / I u I I ---_ - - ------ _ - - -- - I _ - ~, . --_- ---_Y,- cv C~~ I {^~ I I \l I I _' I VO 'bnJOlVab~S •anrr aa~Niads sti~v~ ~avrl~Vw •saw ~• aw ~a~NMO 3woH woisno o W 2 W rO ~-I Z ~N W • zm u~ OaZ call m = ~ S U ~ Vl ~ ~ VI 0 J I ~I ~ rfl ~I ,I dl 9 ~ ~ I I ------ I I I I ~~ f ~~ s~~ I I ~ "~ _~ I 1 J --------- I ~~I I -------- -~I ___=====z~l I I~ I ~ ~1~ JJ I _ I ® I ~ I • I a ~ I I a I I ~ I I r, I I ml I I I I I - ~ ~ _________1 ~. , I ~(,(/ f' ~I .l JI d~~ a -, • • m P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U 0 ~ N z g \ \ 'S9NIMtlLO 353H1 i.9 NMOH$ 5NOI11ONO0 ONtl ZZOZ-o89Z oBOt) :soj / 5991-99Z (80v) 'yd - SNOISN3WIO 3N1 WOE SNOIlV,Ritlh J.NY dO O31dIlON OZ 156 ' p ' sod uo5 sup a6pl~yyoN ZCS9 - 391rrllW 3O1dd0 SHl ONtl 8Of 3H1 NO STIOLLIONOO Buylnsuap a u6isap fiulpling lolo~owwo~ •IOOUep(sey a == ONtl 6NO15N3WI0 ~~'?JOd 3~915NOd53TJ 39 ONtl'AdIT13/. S31dI~OSSd NJIS3a HS(1lJ , ~' S?JOlOtl211NOO'NOISN3W1O O3"IVOS 2l3AO 3'T13O3O3TJd 3htlH lltlHS~ 59NIMIb2O 353H1 NO NOISN3WI0 N3111?1M -?J3N91S3O 3H1 ,l9 N3AI9 SI NOISSIW?J3d 553~N0 NO3M3N O31tlOlONI 6tl 4130X3 ! O3f'O?Jd J.Md ?1Od 035!1 39 lON A W 213N9153O 3H1 :10 JLLTAdOL'd 3111 3TJtl 59NIMt?JO 3S3N1 O wa 0 ...1 w_ O z '~- N W 2 O U ~ ~ \ ' ~ I~ 0 ~.~ 1 1 ~I ~ ~I 4 ~ ~ ~I I I ~I~I ~ • . •