HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-11-1962 Planning Commission Minutes CITY OF SARA~0GA P.MI~4INC
Tit0ez 7600 P. Me, Tuesd2y, Septre-her 11, 1962
Place: Fruitvale Schools Ft~itvale Avenue, Saratoga, Call£otnia
TNpe: lle~ular Meetin8
I, ROUTII~ ORGANIZATION
The meetin~ wee called to order by Chairman Webster at 7:09 P, H.
A, R~.L CALL
Presents C~ssiouers Crisps Gler, n, Johnson, Kellum and Webster.
Absent: C~;-,sesioners Anderson ,~4 Cowlay.
Be RII~JTE$
Co~--essioner Johnson moved, seconded by C~.-..tssioner Glenn, that the
reading of the ~4m,tes o£ the meeting of August 27, 1962, be waived and
that the minutes be spproved as prepared n_,~ submitted to the C-~.~.Assien;
motion carried *m~rn4tanUSlye
IIo EUBLIC HEARINg.
The Chairman declared public hear4~s open for the evening at 7:13 'Po
A. ...C~7 - Dr. D. A, Salzher$, Saratoga Avenue - Request for Cban~e of Zonin$
fr..~. '~t-1-12s500' to '~i-14-3~000" - Continued from Angust 27, 1962
For the purpose of review, the Secretary aSain read the Sta£f Hapoft and
the letter o£ protest submitted by Hr°
Dr. SalzberZ and 14r, Hovik were present and stated 1) the contour of the
land makes it di£ficult to develop this site into more th,, one or
single f~ty ~-~e ,~ they still would not be particularly desirable
2) the subject property is almost entirely surrounded by nndtiple dwel-
llass with the SarateXan Apartate on the ~est, Crystal Terrace Apart-
~ents on the East and Brsokaide Glen Apartments on the North 3) luxury
unite ~nich p~vide Country Club type living are plnn~ed ~) since the
subject property drops sharply £or a distance of approxsmntely 60 feet,
the roo£ line would be only five feet above street Erade 5) they felt
the proposed development wuld be the best possible use o£ the land and
6) indications are that there is a definite need £or this type rental
unit in SararoSa. 21to applicant showed slides of the subject property
and similar apartment units they had developed in Nounrain Vie~, as well
as a perspective of the Nounrain View Apartments. In answer to a ques-
tion from the Chairman, Nr. Hovik advised that the proposed apartments
could be ready for occupancy within a year o£ the rezoning.
p],nn4ua Conmission Hinute~ - S.~ptember ~ls 1962 .- Con~inned
IIo A, C-~? - Dr. Dr A~ Salzbex~
NRS. D. E. BEENAN, SararoSa Avenue and Shadow Oaks ~;ay, protested this
chan~e of zonin~ on the basis that 1) the 'residents want SaratoSs to
r~ymin a lov densit7 area 2) .this area could be developed into lovely
single f,m41y residences in a m~n-er similar to that of l~ossmere Court
and 3) loss of an7 of the beautiful trees on this property vould be
undesirable.
14to Hovik advised that l) they did not plan to r~nve any of the larSer
trees 2) the wooded area ~ould r~in intact and 3) this was part of
the chain of the proposed development and they would not want to destroy
it.
Mrs. Beeman submitted a petition vith twenty-two signatures protest4-~
this charge o~ zonin~, and requested that this application be ~ontinued
since many people in the area had nut realized the matter ~ould be on
the a~enda for this meeting. Chairman Webster directed this petition
filed for record, but reserved opinion ~rLth regard to the request for
a continuation.
MPa. DON AI~ENSs 14060 Saratoga Avenue, stated 1) she fel~ this vould
increase the traffic load on Saratoga Avenue 2) the increase in traffic
would create the need for wideninS and 3) this would destroy the rural
shr~ephere the residents are tryinS so herd to preserve.
Commissioner Crisp observed that the City Council had recently taken
action to eliminute a potential 1,000 spar~mput units from the General
Plan. He stated that it was felt that this action was taken because the
need for this D,n,her of apartments was net indicated and the apartments
that wore needed should be closer to the VillnSe for the benefit o~ older
residents, He then read a Subdivision Counttree Report pertainiU~ to
this mtter.
Dr. SalzberS submitted a report of statements from immediate property
owaers. Since the s~aten~_nts were not signed, Cheirnmn ~/ebster directed
this report admitted for record of ~nme8 of people contacted by Dr.
SalsberS rather than on merit.
Crmn4seioner GI'"- moved, seconded by Connnissioner Kellum, that this
matter be continued until the next regular meeting as requested from
the floor; motion carried ,mnn~nously and Cheirnm_n ~ebster directed
C-47 continued until the meeting on Sapten~er 24~ 1962.
Plann;ing C~mm4ssiOn Minutes - 8eptembe~ 11z 1962 - Conr4msed
B. V-,221 - Fred Voglers Oak Street - Request ,cot Variance in connection vith
Site Area o,c one (1) dvelliug unit o,c a proposed three (3)
Apartmane BuildinR - Continued £rom August 27, 1962 ,
The Secretary read a ooznunieation £tom the City Attorney vlth regard to
this matter.
The opplicant was present ~nd presented elevations o,c the proposed apart-
ment units. He stated 1) he did not ,ceel this property was appropriate
,cot single f_~41y residential 2) it would be a £tneuctal hardship to
have only L~o uults 3) there was n~,le zoom for three units on this pro-
perty, which would make a more practical tnves~nent ,cot the type units
he plansad to build and 4) he vould be happy Go buy additional
and had triads but ~us unable tO do so,
Ccnmissioner Crisp stated that he ,celt the lot was hardly large enouSh
for a one-£amlly house, especially three 'm4~s, but that the ordinance
would allow the applicant to build tvo units,
Camnissinner Joht~_~on stated that the Variance Committee had studied this
matter care£ully and £elt there was no hardship involved that ~;ould war-
rant the ~ran~4n~ of this Variance,
C~..~.4ssioner Glenn tooveda secoudud by Co~missinner Crisp, that the public
hearing on V-221 he closed; motinn carried unanimously and the Chair~mn
declared the public hearing closed at 8:30 Po No
Cuu~issioner Johnson moved, seconded by Commissioner Crisp, that V-221,
Fred Voglers request £or Variance in connection ~tth site area o£ one
dwelling unit o,c a proposed three unit apartment buildings be denied.
Roll call vote: Ayes: Commissioners Crisps Glean, Johnsons Kellum and
Webster, Noes-' None° Absent: C ...... assloners Anderson and Covley°
Notion carried mmni~usly°
The Chairman declared public henrihas closed for the evening at 8-'47 Po ~I°
Chairman l~ebster welcomed Councilman Fred Ritchie to the
RECESS FR~i 8:50 P. 14. TO 9:00 Po No
IIIo SUBDIVISIONS AND Btrn.nll/G SITES
Ao SDR-373 - George G, Noustakass Vessing Road - Building Site Approval -
~ Lots - Continued ~nn.Au~ust 27a 1962
Cr~m4SSinner Crisp advised that the revised map requested in connection
vlth this applieatinn had nut been receivuds so suggested that this
matter be continued until the next meeting° On the basis o£ this sug-
gestinn, Chai~n l/abater directed SDR-373 continued until the meetin~
on Soptpmber 24, 1962,
Plann4n~ Coaaiss. ion l~inutes - Sep~ber 11~ 1962 - Continued
ITT, So SDR-374 - Fred Voglerz Oak StreeC - Build4n_a_ Site Approval - 1 Lot -
Conti_m,_~ea from Aurdst 27, 1962
The applicant was not present for ~his portion of the mee~4-S,
Ce;.--:ssiouer Crisp read the conditions of approval recoe~ended by the
Buildin~ Site C~n~ttee,
There ~ae a motion by C~issioner Crisp, seconded by Co~nissioner
Glenns ~hat the tentative map for SDR-376 (Exhibit 'A", filed .Ax~et: 17,
1962), Fred VoSler, 1 lot on Oak Street, be apFroved subJec~ to the con-
ditions read by C~..~.~;~iesioner Crisp from the dace sheet da~ed August 21,
1962, which is siSned by the Actin~ Clmtrm~n of the Building Site
miCCee; motion carEled ,m~n4mnUSly,
C, SDR-375 - Hark Thanas & C,~ny; Belle Vista DriVe - Building Site
Approval - I Lot
Nro Henry Gtlbet~ ~es present to represent the applican~ and expressed
satisfaction with the proposed conditions of approval.
C~issioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner Glenn, that ~he ten-
Catlye map for SDR-375 (Exhibit "A', filed August 2~, 1952) , Hark Thomas
& C~Fany, 1 lot off Bella Vista Drive, be spproved subject to the con-
ditions contained in ~he BuildinS Site Conaittee Report of September ll~
1952; m~Cion cox~ied ~nmn(~nnuslyo
IV. DESIGN REVI~
V, NRTW BUSINESS
Re. solution - Heard of Supervisors - OpposinS Startling of Use Permit for
Quarr~ on Co.n~ress Sprin~s Heed
The Secretary a~vised 1) the subject Use Be~...:t spplication for a quart7
on Congress Springs Road had been denied by the San~ Clara County
C~.~-~esion in Hatch; 1962; and 2) an appeal yes filed and rill come before
the Board of Supe~visors on October 22~ 1962o He read a proposed resolution
opposing the Sranting of this Use Permit,
C~m~ssioear Glenn moved, seconded by Co~issioner Crisp, ~haC this resolu-
tion be adopted by the F]~--(ng C~-~'..!ssibn and transmitted to the Bo~-d of
Supervisors, Boll call vote: Ayes: C~-..~.iesioears Crisp, Glenn,
Kellom and Vebstero Noes: None° Absent: C~iseioners Anderson and
Covlsyo Hation carried unanimousIT,
Plannin~ C~mlssion Minutes - Sept~her 11s 1962 - Continued
VI. OLD B~SINESS
A, C-46 - Gilbert C. 14my. Sar.ato~a~Snnn~vale Road - Chan~e o~ Zonin~
The Secretary read a comnunication frOm' the City ~ministrator sCatinS
that the City Council had requested r~at this matter be reviewed and a
reconmz~ndation made with re~ard ~o C~editional Zonin~o
Co~ssioner Crisp moved, seconded by C~......Issioner Johnson, that the
Fla~n4ug C~.-.,4ssion reconnnend to the City Council that Conditional
Zonin~ be approved in connection with C-46, Gilbert C, 14ay, with the
proviso that the use o£ the property shall be confined ~o nurseries and
~ardun supply sOstess including decorative rock~ provided that all equip-
ment~ supplies and merchandise other than plants and rock shall be kept
within a completely enclosed bulldin~ and that ~ertilizer of any t~pe shall
be stored and sold in packaged ~orm only, and subject to c~liance with
Article 13 (Design Review) o£ Ordinance NS-3. Roll call vote: Ayes:
C~nmissioners Crisp, Johnson, Kellum and Webster, Noes: C~...~.4ssionar
Glenn, Absent: Cv~lssione~s Anderson and Cowley. 14orion carried.
Cornre4 esioner Glenn stated that his negative vote was based on his belief
tha~ this action ~4ould open the door for C~..~,.~cial ZoninS all the ray Co
Pierce Road.
Bo The Secretary reported that ~o date no problem had arisen in connection
with the new type conditions for BuildinS Site Approval° The Clmirmn
requested that axmther report be given at the first mee~inS in January°
VII, CO~flJNICATIONS
A. WRIT~N
lo SD.R-311 - 3osep..h..Bouncinn~ Sobe.~ Road - Request. £or Exten. sion
The Secretary read a letter from Joseph Bonacius requestin~ an exten-
sion in connection wi~h SDK-311o
C~nnmissioner Crisp moved, seconded by C~issioner Glenn, that SDK-311
be extended for a period o£ one (1) year, £rom September 2~, 1962, Co
September 25, 19~; motion carried unanimously.
2° A-83 - .Creative Workshoo of .Los Altos - Request ~or Reconsideratio..n
The Secretary read a letter ~n 14r. ArresttonS requesting recon-
sial°ration in connection with his request ~or an extension. He also
reed letters ~rom As A. Dempsey, Clark Pl,nmbin~ Company and the
Saratoga Fire Depa~!~nt in sopport of this request.
P..la~zn~.n~ Cennnispion Minutes - September 11~ 1962 - Continued
VII. Ao 2. A-83 ~ Creative Workshop. of .Los Altos
lro Armstrong was present and revised his request for further use
o£ the Fir~m~nue ltall to six (6) months (September 17, 1962 to
l{arch 17s 1963), three (3) days each week (~uesday, Wednesday and
· hursday)s 9 A. rt. to 10 P~ li., and stated that he felt sure they
could find a permanent studio in that length of
Commissioner GleNn moved, seconded by _C~ssioner Johnson, that the
Creative Workshopes use o2 the Firem~n*s Hall (A-83) be extended for
a period of six months (September 171 1962 to ltarch 17, 1963), three
(3) days each week (~uesday, Wednesday and thursday), 9 A. 1~o to
10 P, l~os subject to the following conditions:
1) Parking to be o~f-street only, enforced by the operators o~ the
Creative Workshop.
2) ~he ~lanning C¢-!,,..~ Ssion re.taihs continuing Jurisdiction over the
use herein greeted and expressly reserves the right from time to
time to media-y, delete or make additions to any or all o£ the
conditions thereo~ or to term4n~te or extend the use. either on
its own motion or on the epplieation o£ the applicant, in order
to preserve a substantial right of the applicant, or to preserve
the health sdety~ morals. convenience or wel£are of persons
resid4ne or xeorking in surrounding areas, or to preserve exist!~.~.~
or prospective values of property ant improvements. or to prevent
a public nuisance.
Roll call vote: Ayes: Coutaissioners Glenn, Johnson. Kellem and
Webster. Noes~ Co~anissionsr Crisp. Absent, Comm4ssioaere Anderson
and Cowlay. 14~tion carried.
Co,.-.;tssioncr Crisp left the meeting at approximately 9:30 P.
3. SDR-.371 - He Jo Sternera E1 quite Way - P~R~e..et for Reeons..i..deration
rne Secretary read a letter from He J. Sterner requesting recon-
sideration o2 conditions in connection srith the improvement of E1
Quite Way and the right-of-way width of the access road° Be also
read a conmtmieation from the City Engineer recomnending that the
specifications in connection with the improvement of E1 quite Way
be changed from 2-1/2 inches of plantmix surfacing to double seal
coat oil and screenings.
Mr. Sterner was present and advised that he s~as unable to obtain addi-
tieeel right-of-way width, su would be unable to comply ~ith the re-
quirement for a 20 foot right-o£-x;ay on the access road.
Chairman Webster directed this matter continued until the next regu-
lar meeting and referred this request Jointly to the Subdivision
and Variance Committees for study and a report at this meeting.
~lsnxd. n~i C~.~.lssinn M'l~utes - Sept,~.her 11v 1962 r Con~
VII. A. 4. L.inkletter-Totteu Dance S~udios, Prospect Avenue - RequesC for Addi-
tional Perm~,~ted Uee in C-N Zone ...
The Secretary read a letter from William Lo Bradnet of Linkletter-
Totten Dance Studios requesting that Dance Studios be added to the
list o£ permiZ~ed uses in n C-N Zone.
Mr. Bradden ~as present and explained that his compamy desired
loca~e a studio in the C-N District on Prospect Avenue. He further
advised that their students were a~e 3 to 16 and were picked up by
studio tr__-n_eportation, so parkin~ was no problem.
Chairman Webster directed this matter continued until the weetin~
on September 24, 1962~ and referred stone to the General Plan Com-
mittee £or etud~ and n report at this meeting. At the suggestion
o£ the Secretary, Chait~nan Webster further directed that the General
Plen C~..-~tttee review all pen~tted uses at this
ng~xn~ DECtArtan THE MEETING ~DJOURI~D AT 9:4~ P. ~.
Respectfully submitted,
S~anley M. Wal~rs Secretary
Saratoga Planning Cc-w~ ssion
V
ClTY OF SARATOGA PLANNING CO~ilSSION
~ENDA
7.~00 P~ Mi~ Tuesday, September li, 1962
Fruitvale School, Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California
I. RO~TINE ORGANIZATION
A. ROLL CALL
B. MINUTES
II. PUBLIC .H~LRING8
A. 6-47 -- Dr. D..A.S.alz. berMs SaraCogs Avenue. - Request for Change
of Zoning from '~1-1-12,500" to '~-I4-3,000" - Continued
from August 27, 1962
B. V.-221 - Fred VoWlets Oak Street - Request for Variance in connec-
tion vith Site Area of one (1) d~elling unit of a proposed
~hree (3) unit Apartment Building - Continued from
August 27, 1962
SUBDIVISIONS AND BUILDI. I~...SITES
A. SDR-373 - GeorMe G. Mous~akas~ Vessin~ Road - Building Site Appro-
val - 4 Lots - Continued from August 27, 1962
B. SDR-374 - Fr.ed V.o~ler~ Oak Stree~ - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot -
Continued from August 27, 1962
SDR-375 - Mark Thomas and Company. Bells Vista Drive - Buildin~
Site Approval - 1 Lot
1V. .DESIGN .REVIEW
V. N~.$; BUSINESS
Resolution - B~a~d of Supervisors - Opposing granting of Use Permit
for Quarry on Congress Springs Road
VI. OLD BUS. INESS
VII. .C..8MM~..NICATIONS
A. RRITTEN
SDR-311 - Joseph Bonaclue. Sobey Read - Request for Extension
B. ORAL