Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-13-1965 Planning Commission Minutes (2) SUN~L~RY OF MINUTES . CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING CO~RIISSXON ~. ,.'.. ~.; .'.. 'TI~E: Monday, 13 September 1965, 7:30 P.M. ' '.. .. PLACE: City Council Chambers, Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California' TYPE: Regular Meeting ~e meeting was called to order by C~irmn Norton at 7:32 P. M. Present: Comissioners Cowley, Crisp, ~11~, McFall, Norton Absent: Comissioner Wright. ,. Co~issioner McFall moved, seconded by Comissioner Crisp, that the '." ~' '. "-. reading of. the'minutes of .23 August 1965 be waived and that the · ' "' minu~es be approved as submitted; motion carried u~ni~usly. · '" ~-' .. I~ was moved by Comissioner Crisp and seconded by Co~issioner """-" · . Cowley that the ~eading of the minutes of the special meeting held "' ...' ""' ' 16 August 1965 (for the purpose of reviewing the General' Plan) be .-""'.:".' '.'~ :.:.' waived and ~hat.the minutes be approved as submitted; mtion carried "' ' '"" ~'. .'~. '.' ..' C~i~n.Nor~on declared publi~ hearings open for ~he evening a~ 7:36 P,H..' ~':'. "' · .'~.'..' ~ 'A. C-8~ - ~milton Development Corporation, Pierce ~ad - Request for' '.' " mnity) - Continued from 23 Au~us~ 1965 "' ... · .." ~e continued heari~ on C-83 was res~d at 7:37 P.M. ~e Secre- ' ~.. -' ... tary advised ~ha~ nothing further had been' added to the file. · ~ . . ..'-... 'Comissioner Crisp advised 1) the Subdivision Comittee had met with ' ""'"" the applicant a~ the planning consultan~ 2) the planning consultant had, at this ~,. suetted mterial for the applican~ to stay 3)' it was agreed th'a~ the applicant, after r~ie~ this mterial, would request a met~g with the Su~ivision Comittee to discuss ter further and 4). to date, the applicant h~ ~t ~equested an ap- pointment with the C~ittee. .. . .'. Plannin~ Connnission'Minutes - 13 September 1965 II. A. .9-83 - Hamilton Development Corporation The Secretary advised that the extension of time for action on the " tentative map filed in conjunction with this application would ex- pire 15 September 1965. He further advised l) he had informed the applicant's representative of this sit6ation .2) it was his under- standing that'a letter ~ran~in~ a further extension of time would be filed prior to the meeting or a representative would be present at the meeting and 3) the letter had not yet been received and the ap- 'plicant's representative had not yet arrived., In view of the foregoing, Chairman Norton (at 7:40 P. M.) deferred further hearing on C-83~ Hamilton Development Corporation, until the end of .the public hearing agenda. 'B. ~-87 - M.V.S.Company, Saratoga Avenue - Request for Chan~e of Zonir~ from "A" (A~ricultural) to '~-M-4,000 P-C" (Multiple Residen- "' tial Planned Coua.unity) - Continued from 23. August 1965 " The public hearing on C-87 was not re-opened at this time since '.'.. 1) this application had been continued with the applicant's permis- .': · sion pending further developments with the review of the General Plan " " :' 2) no recommendations had yet been made in connection with the '.'.".... · . General Plan review and 3) there was no one present who wished to " ~'~comment with regard to this matter. '.. Chairman Norton directed C-87~ M.V.S.Company, continued until the meeting on 27 September 1965. ."' ". .. · C. .~-88 - Finnegan Construction Company, Inc., Wardell Road - Request .. '. for Change of Zoning from "R-l-15,000" and'~-l-40,O00" (Single "' .: Family Residential) to "'R-I-20,000" (Single Family Residential) · .. ·.Continued from 12 July 1965 ....! :!. The continued hearing on C-88 was resumed at 7:41P. M. The Secre- · tary read 1) a letter from Mr. Finnegan requesting that this appli- ~'. -i -' cation be withdrawn and 2) a communication from Miles Rankin reques- :.. · ring that discussion of this matter. be continued since the subject .... =' property had been sold and a new application would be filed. The Se-' ':.' cretary stated that he had consulted the City Attorney and had been '. '. advised that unless Mr Finnegan would transfer his application rights '...'. to the new owner of the property, further discussion should be defer- : red until a new application had been filed and a Notice of Hearing had .. been published.. .In answer to a question from Chairman Norton, Mr. Rankin advised that Mr. Finnegan had not transferred his. application rights to the new PlanninR Commission Minutes - 13 September 1965 II.. C.. ~-88.- Finne~an Construction Company, Inc. .. owner of this property. In view of this, Chairman Norton then ruled " that further discussion would'have to be withheld until a formal apt plication had been filed and a notice had been published. " Commissioner Crisp 'then"mOVed,~econded:by Commissioner O'Rorke, that Finnegan Construction Company, Inc. be allowed to withdraw C-88, ap-. plication for'change of zoning on Wardell Road; motion carried '. ~'unanimously. D. C-90 - Town and Country Realty, Cox and Saratoga Avenues - Request for Change of Zoning from "A" (Agricultural) to '~-A" (Pro- ... fessional-Administrative) - Continued from 23 August.1965 The continued hearing on C-90 was re-opened at 8:48 P.M. The Secre- tary .presented a perspective of the proposed professional' building. .'Ty Papalias was present to represent the applicant, but stated that he · '~ had no further comment at this time. There was no one else present Who wished to speak with regard to this · matter. .. Commissioner Crisp read the report of the Subdivision Committee rela-' .. tire to C-90, recommending denial of same. .. After further discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Crisp and seconded by Commissioner McFall that the hearing on C-90 be closed; ' motion carried unanimously and the-hearing was closed at 7:54 P. M. Commissioner McFall moved, seconded..by Commissioner Kellum; that the report of the Subdivision Committee relative to C-90, Town and Country Realty, recommending denial of this application, be approved by the " · . Commission and forwarded to the City Council as the recommendation of · : the Commission;. motion carried unanimously. E. ~-91 - Clara M. Stamper, Anza Drive - Request for Change of Zoning from "A" (Agriculture) to '~-1-12,500 P-D" (Single Family Resi- dential Planned Development) · ... The public hearing on C-91 was..opened at 7:56 P. M. The Secretary advised that a Notice of Hearing had been published and there were no written communications on. file. Joe Sweany,'engineer for the applicant, explained that P-D zoning was :. not needed in connection with development of this property and had been requested for the sole purpose of providing uniform zoning for the area in question. .. Planning Commission Minutes - 13 September 1965 · .-. II. E. 'C-91 - Clara M. Stamper' There was no one else present who wished to comment with regard to this application. .~ .. After discussion, Chairman Norton (at 8:04 P.M.) directed C-91, Clara M. Stamper, continued' until the meeting on 27 September 1965 and referred same to the Subdivision Committee for study and a re- port at that time. F. General Plan - Annual Review - Continued from 23 August 1965 The continued hearing on the General Plan was resumed at 8:05 P. M. Carl Peters, Deltaviland Drive, stated' 1) he wished to withdraw his previous objection to the M.V.S.Company proposal for a multiple planned community development on Saratoga Avenue and 2) after fur- ther study he felt that this proposal would be an appropriate develop- ment for this property. Conrad Fischer, DeHaviland Drive, stated that he, too, would like to conditionally retract his previous objection to this proposal. He explained that he would object to this project if it was proposed as' strictly a senior citizen development, but would not object otherwise. Commissioner Kellum 1) advised that the General Plan Committee Re- port had been completed and 2) summarized the recommendations con- tained in the report. It was moved by Commissioner Cowley and seconded by Commissioner Kellum that the public hearing on the General Plan be closed; motion carried unanimously and the Chairman declared the hearing closed at 8:18 P. M. Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner McFall, that the General Plan Committee Report on the annual review of the General Plan be approved and forwarded to the City Council as the recommenda- tion of the Commission; motion carried unanimously. G. UP-89 - St. Andpews Episcopal Church, Saratoga and Crestbrook Avenues Request for Use Permit for General Church Use - Continued from 23 August 1965 The continued hearing on UP-89 was resumed at 8:19 P.M. The Secre- tary advised that nothing further had been added to the file. Commissioner McFall read the report of the Subdivision'Committee relative to UP-89, recounnending approval of same. -4- Planning Commission Minutes - 13 September 1965 II. G. UP-89 - St. Andrews Episc'opal Church It was noted that Commissioner Crisp, because of his affiliation with the Church, had abstained from participation in the Subdivi- sion Committee study and report. Commissioner McFall called 'the~dommission's attention to the spe- cifics mentioned in the Subdivision Committee Report and advised that they were included only as a matter of information, not as · conditions of approval. After discussion, it was moved by Commissioner McFall and seconded .by Commiss~ioner 0 'Rorke that the public hearing on UP-89 be closed; motion car. r~'ed and the Chairman declared the hearing closed at 8:26 P. M..? Commissioner Keilum moved, seconded by Commissioner O'Rorke, that the SubdiviSion Committee Report of 13 September 1965 relative to UP-89. be approved and that the Use Permit be granted as set forth in said report; motion carried with Commissioner Crisp abstaining. ~:. '~. H. UP-90 ='- Fred N. Cu~aings, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road - Request for Use Permit for a Rental Service Business The public"'hearing on UP-90 was opened at 8:28 P. M. The Secretary advised that Notices of Hearing had been'mailed and there' were no written communications on file. There was n~ one in the audience who wished to comment with regard to this mat_.t. er. Commissioner Crisp explained 1) the Subdivision Committee felt that the proposed use was a very desirable community service which, at the present time, did not exist within the City of Saratoga 2) upon the recommendation of the Subdivision Committee, the Com- mission had recently added "Equipment Rental Service" as a condi- tional use in the Commercial Service Zone and 3) the subject appli- cation for a Use Permit had been filed in accordance with this action. He then read the report of the SubdiVision Committee relative to this request, recommending that same be approved. It was moved by Commissioner Crisp and seconded by Commissioner O 'Rorke that the hearing on UP-90 be 'closed; motion carried unani- mously and the Chairman declared the hearing closed at 8:36 P. M. Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner O'Rorke, that the report of the Subdivision Committee dated 13 September 1965 relative to UP-90, Fred N. Cummings, be approved and that the Use Permit be' granted subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously.. -5- Planning Commission Minutes - 13 September 1965 II. A. ,~-83 - Hamilton Development Corporation, Pierce Road Since a representative from Hamilton Development Corporation still. had not arrived, Chairman Norton deferred further hearing on C-83 until after recess. .. .~ RECESS AND RECONVENE II. A. C-83 - Hamilton Development C0rporation~ Pierce Road The continued hearing on C-83 was resumed at 9:00 P. M. Chairman Norton explained that further hearing on this matter had been post- poned on two occasions earlier in the meeting to await the arrival of a representative from Hamilton Development Corporation, who still had not arrived. Commissioner Crisp 1) explained that the time for action on the tentative subdivision map filed in conjunction with the subject change of zoning application would expire on 15 September 1965 2) observed that the Commission, under the circumstances, had no choice but to deny the application since the map on file was not satisfactory and did not comply with zoning requirements and 3) re- commended that this matter be denied without prejudice so that'the application could be re-actiVated if the applicant so desired. During the discussion that followed, Commissioners Crisp and Kellum gave a brief resume of recommendations made by Mr. Lackey (Planning Consultant). with reference to this matter. Chairman Norton then re- quested that the Secretary arrange for a written report or oral presentation of Mr. Lackey's study and analysis for the entire Com- mission since the information would be of great value in the future. Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner Kellum, that both C-83 (application for change of zoning) and SD-569 .(application for subdivision approval), Hamilton Development Corporation, be denied without prejudice; motion carried unanimously. ~III. SUBDIVISIONS AND BUILDING SITES. A. SD-569 - Hamilton Development Corporation, Pierce Road - Subdivision 65 Lots - Continued from 23 August 1965 See Item II-A above. -6- Planning Commission Minutes - 13 September 1965 III. B. SDR-591 - James F. Jones~·quito Road - Building Site Approval - 2 L6ts Commissioner Crisp recommended that SDR-591, James F. Jones, be con- tinued until the next regul·a'r meeting pending a report from the Flood Control District relative to this application. Chairman Norton so diredtedi C.· SD-592 - Western Hills Investment Company, Pierce Road - Subdivision - 26 Lots· Commissioner Crisp advised that the Subdivision Committee had reques- ted that site development plans be submitted, so recommended that this matter be continued to allow adequate time for preparation of these plans. Chairman Norton directed SD-592, Western Hills Investmen~ Company, continued until·the meeting on 27 September 1965. D. SDR-593 - Rolston Johnson, Pierce Road - Building Si~,e Approval - 1 Lot Commissioner Crisp recommended that SDR-593, Rolston Johnson, be con- tinued unti.1 the next regular meeting since the Committee had requested that a site development plan be submitted. Chairman Norton so directed. E. SDR-594 - Dr. Robert S. Cox, Jr., Pike Road - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot The applicant was no~ present. Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner McFall, that the · Building Site Committee Report of 13 September 1965 relative to SDR-594, Dr. Robert S. Cox, Jr., be adopted and tha-t. the tentative map (Exhi- bit "A", filed 3 September 1965) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. F. SDR-595 - Lawrence R. Yegge, Mendelsohn Lane - Building Site Approval -. 1 Lot The Building'Site 'Committee Report relative to SDR'595 was amended, with. concurrence of the Committee, to. require underground utilities from the nearest pole. Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner McFall, that the Building Site Committee Report of 13 September 1965 relative to SDR-595, as amended, be adopted and that the'tentative map (Exhi- bit "A", filed 3 September 1965) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. -7- Planning Commission Minutes - 13 September 1965 Chairman Norton extended a welcome to Councilman Burry and to Mesdames Owens and Parker and Mr. Smith of the Good Government Group. He also expressed appreciation for the coffee served by Mesdames Owens and 'Parker at recess./ IV. DESIGN REVIEW .. A. A-152 - WellaireD Inc., ?rO~pec~ Avenue!-' Final Design Approval - Commercial Building - Continued from 23 August 1965 Commissioner Cowley advised that the parking problem had been worked out satisfactorily and it was the recommendation of the Design Review Committee that the subject application be approved. After discussion, it was moved by'Commissioner Cowley and seconded by Commissioner O'Rorke that A-152, Weilaire, Inc., be granted final design approval for the commercial building as shown on Exhibits "A-2" and ~'B" with the exception of the sign which is subject to further design.review; motion carried unanimously. B. A-193 - Prince of Peace Lutheran Church, Saratoga Avenue - Preliminary' Design Apprgval - Addition Commissioner Cowley advised that the Committee had reviewed the sub- ject plans and preliminary design approval was recommended subject to 1) the applicant's providing additional parking and 2) the east-west access road to Saratoga AvenUe being incorporated into.the final plans. After discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Cowley and seconded by Commissioner O'Rorke that preliminary design approval be granted A-193, · Prince of Peace Lutheran Church,.as shown on Exhibit "A" subject to 1) provision of two parking spaces for each five seats in the church and 2) incorporation of the access.road (running east-west) into the final plans; motion carried unanimously. .. C. A-194 - University Pre-School,'Big Basin Way - Final Design Approval - Nursery School Commissioner Cowley advised that the Committee had reviewed the sub- ject plans and found them satisfactory. He explained that the struc- ture and parking are existing and the .landscaping, including a five- foot planting area along the property line adjacent to the school which was requested by the Committee, has been shown on the plans. After discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Cowley and seconded by Commissioner O'Rorke, that final design approval be granted A-194, University Pre-School, as shown on Exhibit "A"; motion carried unanimously. -8- Plannin~ Connnission Minutes - 13 September 1965 IV. D. A-195 - Clarence Neale, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road - Preliminary Design ~' Approval of New Commercial Building and Final Design Approval of Addition to Existin~ Structure Commissioner Cowley advised that in reviewing the site plan submitted in connection with the subject application, the Committee had found that some of the parking indicated was on State property and some of it was on other adjacent property under ownershipgther than that of the applicant. The applicant explained 1) an Encroachment Permit issued to him by the State had been filed with the Secretary 2) ~is agreement with the State was that in return for filling, black-topp.~ng and maintaining this property, the State would permit him to use it for parking and · .3) he would be happy to submit any type lease or~agreement desired by the CommisSion with respect tO the parking indicated on the other adja- cent property. The. Secretary confirmed that the applicant had submitted an Encroach- ment Permit issued by the State, but advised that he could find no clause' in the document which specifically permitted encroachment for parking. Commissioner Cowley stated that he would recommend against permitting the applicant to use the State property for parking unless a 99-year lease could be obtained. During the discussion that followed, questions were raised with respect to access to the parking from the highway and the legality of providing parking on leased property on a permanent basis. In view of ~his, Chairman Norton directed this matter continued until the next regular meeting and referred same to the Staff (Planning Director, DireCtor,of Public Works and City Attorney) for study and a report at that time. When Mr. Neale expressed concern with regard to the delay in action on this application, the Commission advised that the only action that could be taken at this time would be denial of the application. In view of this, the applicant agreed to having it continued. The Secretary advised that the applicant had also submitted a list of additional uses that he would like the Commission to add to the list of uses permitted under his conditional zoning. The Chairman directed this request continued until the meeting on 27 September 1965 and asked that the Planning Director determine whether or not a public hearing would be necessary and place the item on the agenda accordingly. -9-' Plannin~ Commission Minutes - 13 September 1965 V. CITY COUNCIL REPORT Commissioner McFaI1 advised that he had artended the last City Council meeting, but questioned the need for a report since the minutes had already been mailed to the Commission. The Commission concurred that a report was not necessary and briefly discussed various items considered by the Council. at that meeting. VI. NEW BUSINESS New Laws Governin~ Subdivisions The Secretary advised that a communication had been .~C. eived from the City Attorney re~arding new laws covering subdivisid~!~.."."'He suggested that this ~ommunication be referred to the Subdi~isi0B~C~mmittee for After discussion, Chairman Norton-referred this matter'to ~he Subdivision Committee for study and a-report at their convenience~ .,..iHe also requested that the Secretary mail. to each member of the Commission~'~a copy of the City Attorney's communication. VII. OLD BUSINESS A.' Ordinance NS-3.11 - Proposed Amendment to Ordinance NS-3 Relating Certain Definitions and Sections pertaining to the KeepinM of Horses The Secretary advised that this item had been placed on the agenda for the purpose of determining when the public hearing should be set for discussion of same. E. Brandt Teerlink, attorney, of 21810 Mr. Eden Road, addressed 'the Commission as spokesman for approximately 25 people who had artended the meeting' because of an interest in the subject ordinance. In angwer to questions raised by Mr. Teerlink, Chairman Norton explained 1) as previously stated by the Secretary, the public hearing on this ordi- nance had not yet been set so any discussion of same at this time would be premature 2) the ordinance did not propose a change in the require- ments for keeping 'horses in Saratoga 3) the ordinance was proposed for the purpose of clarifying certain definitions and sections relative to the keeping of horses in residential districts, and for adding the defi- nition of '%eeping" 'and a section relative to horses for riding lessons and 4) the Commission would be glad to hear comments from interested residents when the matter came before the ,Commission for public hearing. After further discussion, Chairman Norton direc~,ed, with concurrence of the Commission, that .the' Secretary set the public hearing on Ordinance NS-3.11 for the earliest feasible date. -10-. Plannin~ Commission Minutes - 13 September 1965 VII. B. SD'567 - Loma Serena Development Company, Inc., Prospect Avenue - Request for Reconsideration Commissioner Crisp advised 1) the Subdivision Committee had not yet completed its study relative to this matter 2)! the Committee had requested a conference with the City Attorney during the next week for further discussion of this request and 3) in view of the foregoing, it was the recommendation of the Committee that this matter be continued until the next regular meeting. Chairman Norton so directed. VIII. COMMUNICATIONS A. WRITTEN 1. SDR-584 - Frank L. Gippetti, Fruitvale Avenue - Request for Recons id erat ion The .Secretary advised that a consultation with the City Attorney was necessary in connection with this request, so suggested that this matter be continued. Chairman Norton, with concurrence of the Commission, directed 'the request in connection with SDR-584 continued until the next regular meeting. 2. SDR-588 - Dale D. Wickham, Via ReMina - Request for Reconsideration Mr. Wickham was present to discuss with the Commission his re- quest for reconsideration of the requirement for underground utili- ties. , , Commissioner Crisp explained that this request involved a policy matter and he 'felt it should be discussed by the Commission as a whole rather than by the SUbdivision Committee. After discussion, Commissioner McFall moved that Mr. Wickham~s request for reconsideration be denied on the basis that no evi- dence had been submitted to justify same. This motion died for lack of a second. Commissioner 0~Rorke observed that the City Council seemed to base its decision (relative to underground utilities) on the practical result, i.e., whether there would be an advantage in having the utilities underground, rather than the cost of same. After further domment, Commissioner 0'Rorke moved that Mr. Wickham's request for reconsideration be approved since there seemed to be a 3ust reason not to apply this requirement in this case.. Commissioner Kellum seconded the motion. -11-] ~lannin~ Commission Minutes - 13 September 1965 VIII. A. 2. SDR-588 - Dale D. Wickham Tom Scott, Via Regina, spoke in favor of granting Mr. Wickham's request. He explained that' the other lines i..n the area were overhead and there seemed to be little benefit. to the area in having Mr. Wickham's residence the only one w~th lines placed underground. Roll call vote: Ayes: Commissioners Cowley, Kellum and O'Rorke. Noes: Commissioners Cri..sp, McFall and Norton. Absent: Commis- sioner Wright. The vote on the motion was tied. Commissioner O'Rorke observed 1) the subject condition was im- posed by a unanimous vote of the Commission 2) the motion to eliminate the condition had ended in a tied vote and 3) for this reason, he felt it was appropriate to let the motion die. Chairman Norton concurred and further observed that it was un- likely that a seventh Commissioner would be present at the next meeting to break the tied vote. He requested, therefore, that the Secretary assist Mr. Wickham in presenting this matter to the City Council' at the next regular meeting. B. ORAL "' 1. In answer to a question from Clarence Neale relative to 'delays in Commission action on various applications, Chairman Norton explained 1) a seven-man Commission was involved 2) it was a part-time job for all with pressure from many sources and 3) sufficient time for careful study was essential to be sure the Commission was doing its best for the City. 2. Commissioner Crisp explained that the City Council had rec&ived' a request for at least a three-year extension in connection with the conditional zoning on the balance of the Saratoga Inn pro- perty. In answer to his question, Chairman Norton, with concur- rence of the Commission, assured Commissioner Crisp that the Com- mission would have no objection to having this matter referred for study and recommendation. 3. Commissioner Crisp advised that the Subdivision Committee would like permission to propose a list of restricted retail uses for the Commercial Service zone. Chairman Norton, with concurrence of the Commission, authorized the Committee to compile such a list and present it to the Commission for study. 4. Commissioner Crisp questioned the possibility of approaching the City Council with a request for a pathway from the Saratoga High School to the Village. Chairma~ Norton, with concurrence of the Commission, authorized the Committee to make such a request. -12- Planning Commission Minutes - 13 September 1965 VIII. B. 5. The Secretary advised that Mr. Pon's request for commercial zoning on Prospect Avenue (City of San Jose) had been denied by a vote of 4 to 1. IX. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Norton declared the meeEing adjourned at 11:00 P. M. Respectfully s~~ ~lker, Secretary Saratoga Planning Commission V -13- CITY OF SARATOGA PI~NNING COM~IISSION AGENDA TIME: ~onday, September 13, 1965, 7:30 P. M. PLACE: Ci:ty Council Chambers, Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California TYPE: Regular Meeting '- ****~, I, ROUTINE ORGANIZATION A. ROLL CALL B. i, fXN'D'TES II PUBLIC HEARINGS A~ .CT'.8.3 - Ha~ilton Developmen~ Corporation. P~er.c...e .Road - Request for Change of Zoning from "R~l~40,000'' (Single Family Residential) to "R-I-40,000 P-C" (Single Family Residential Planned Community) - Continued from AuguSt 23~ 1965 B. C..-87 - M.V.'S~ ..Compa.ny, Sara't. qRa Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from z."A" (Agricultural) to "R-M-4,000 P-C" (Multiple Residential Planned Community) - Continued from August 23, 1965 C. C-88 - Fi'.nnegan Construction Company, Inc., Wardell Road - Request for Change of Zoning from "R-l-15,000" and "R-I-..40,000" (Single Family Residential) to "R-I-20,000" (Single Family Residential) - Cbntinued from July 12, 1965 D. C~.90 - Town apd Country Reaity, Co.x and. SaratoRa Avenues - Request for Change of Zoning fro~ "A" (Agrichltural) to "P-A" (Professional- Administrative) - Continued from August 23, 1965 E. C"91 - .C¢lara M...Stamper, Ad~-a Drive -' Request for Change .of Zoning from. "A" .(Agricultural)' to "R-1~12,500 ~-D" (Single Fardiiy Residential P lanhed Deve i0pmene ) F. ~ENERAL PLAN - AnnUal RevieW4 , Continued from AugUst 23, 1965 .~ . G. - St ndr. ews. .piscop i, Chur..Ch, Sat. aroma and. C~e~tbrook Avenues - ReQuest for Use Permit fo~ General Church Use H. UP-90 - Fred N. Cummings~ Sarato~a-Sunnyval.e_. Road - Request for Use Permit for a Rental Service Business !II. SUBDIVISIONS AND BUILDING SITES A. SD-569 - Hamilton Development Corporation, Pierce Road - Subdivision - 65 Lots - Continued from August 23, 1965 B. SDR-591 - James F. Jones, quito Road - Building Site Approval - 2 Lots C. SD-592 - Western Hills Investment Company, Pierce Road - Subdivision - 26 Lots D. SDR-593 - Rolston Johnson, Pierce Road - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot E. SDR-594 - Dr. Robert S. Cox, Jr.., Pike Road - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot F. SDR-595 - Lawrence R. Ye~e, Mendelsohn Lane - Building Site Approval 1 Lot -1- ~.lannin~ COmmis~ion..Agenda - September .13, 1.965 IV. DESIGN REVIEW A. A-152 - Weliairei .'In~., P~qspect AvenUe - Final Design Approval - Commercial Building - Continued from August 23, 1965 B. A-i93'- Pr'.ince o'f.'Peace Lutheran Church, Saratoga Avenue - Preliminary Design Approval -' C. A-194 - University Pre-School, Big BasiQ.Way - Final Design Approval D. A-195'- Clarence Neale, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road - Final and Preliminary Design Approval V- CITY COUNCIL REPORT Vi. NEW BUSINESS VII. OLD BUSINESS A. Ordinance NS-3.11 - Proposed. Amendment to Ordinance NS-3 Relating to Certain Defini~ions and the Keeping of Horses B. SD-567 - Loma Serena Development.Company, Inc.. Pr.ospect Avenue - Request for Reconsideration VIII. COMMUNICATIONS A. WRITTEN SDR~'584 - Frank.L..~.~Oipp~.tt.i.,.~ruitVal~ ~venue - ReqUest fo~ Reeonsider- ation SDR-~88 - Dale D'.. Wickham~.'Vi~ R~'~Qa - Request for Reconsideration B~ ORAL IX. ADJOURNMENT -2-