HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-08-1967 Planning Commission Minutes SU~ARY OF MIN~UTES
CITY OF SA~RATOGA PLANN,_~.G CO~viMISSION
TI~Z: Monday, 8 ~ay 1967, 7:30 P.M.
P!JCE: City Council Chambers, Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California
TYPE; Regular Meeting
I. ROUTINE ORGANIZATION
A. ROLL CALL
Present:Commissioners Crisp, Johnson, Kasner, McFall, Norton, and
Smith.
AbSent: Commissioner O'Rorke.
B. MINUTES
Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner Kasner, that the
reading of the minutes of 24 April 1967 be ~ived and that the minutes
be approved subject to the following changes:
page 2. . .Section II, A. UP-120. .line 1. . .change:
"Norton Road to Bohlman Road"
page 2.. .paragraph 9.. .line 6. '..change:
"under estimated to underestimated"
page 4. . .paragraph 1. . . line 5. .add: "Commissioner Norton"
page 5. . .paragraph 5. . .line 2. . .delete: "a"
and change: "communication to communications"
page 5. . .paragraph 5. . .line 4. . .insert: "all" between the
words Mercer and filed
page 5.. .paragraph 11. , . line 2. .add:
"Similar arrangements as the ones proposed by Roy Kosich:"
and delete same from: page 5.. .paragraph 12..' .line 1 & 2
page 7. . paragraph 4.. . line 2.. . change:
"the next regular meeting to read the meeting of 22 May 1967";
motion carried unanimously,
C, CO.~LMITTEES
Chairman Norton stated that since Commissioner Crisp had gained experience
by serving on the General Plan Committee at the time of the previous I.~jor
Review he would like to reappoint him to that Conh~ittee; therefore, requir-
ing the following changes on the Variance Committee:
1) Commissioner McFall was appointed to serve
on the Variance Committee to replace
Commissioner Crisp.
'1-
Planning. Commission Minutes of 8 ~y 1967 - Continued
I. C. COMMITTEES - Continued
2) Commissioner Kasner ~s appointed to serve as Chairman
of the Variance Cormnaittee in place of .Conn~issioner Crisp.
'. D. VISITOR
Chairman Norton introduced and extended a welcome to ~. BergL Gabrielson,
Chief Administrator of Karlshom, Sweden, who is visiting the United States
ano observing local governments.
II. PD~BLIC HEARINGS
A. UP-120 - Sisters of Notre Dame de Namur, Bohlm~n Road - Request for Use
Permit for Construction of New Novitiate Facilities - Continued
from 24 April 1967
The c. ontinued hearing on UP-120 was resumed ~t 7:43 P.M. Con~missioner
McFall briefly reviewed this application and then read a report explain-
ing his position on the application.
Con~nissioner Smith stated that since his residence is situated near this
site he finds it necessary to disqualify himself from any discussion or vote
regarding this nmtter.
There was no one present to represent the applicant.
There was no one in the audience who wished to coF~nent with regard to
this matter.
Commissioner Crisp then read the report of the Subdivision Comnittee
recommending approval of the subject Use Permit.
Commissioner Kasner called attention to a memo, submitted by b[r. Russ of
Sigal Way, stating his opinion with regard to certain aspects of the sub-
ject request.
After discussion, Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner McFa!l,
that the public hearing on UP-120 be closed; motion carried unanimously and
the hearing was closed at 7:52 P.M.
Commissioner Crisp moved, seconded by Commissioner McFall, that the Sub-
division Committee Report of 8 ~ay 1967 relative to' UP-120, be approved
and that the Use Permit be granted in accordance with subject report and
subject to the conditions stated therein; motion carried unanimously.
B. C-106 - M.V.S. Company, Saratoga Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning
from "A" (Agricultural) to "R-M-3,000" (Multiple Residential) -
Continued from 24 April 1967
The continued hearing on C-106 was not resumed at this time. Commissioner
McFall stated that the plans submitted Dreviousb.~ by the applicant have
been unsatisfactory and recommended·.that~·this matter be continued to SUch
time as the applicant is ready to submit additional plans.
Dr. Abrams was present to represent the applicant and stated he would like
this matter continued to the next regular meeting since he planned to sub-
mit further plans prior to that time.
-2-
Plannin~ Co~'nission Minutes of 8,May 1967 - Continued
II. B. C-106 - Continued ~
On this basis, Chairman Norton.directed this matter continued to the
meeting of 22 May 1967.
C. C-71 - Ma.~,nnar investment Company, Walnut Avenue - Request for Change
of Zoning from "R-!-12,500" (Single Family Residential) to
"R ~" ~000" (Multi-Residential) - Continved from 24 April 1967
-~-~
The continued hearing on this matter was re-opened at 8:02 P.M. The
Secretary briefly reviewed this application, and then suma~arized a
report submitted by the attorneys representing Mr.. Bastianelli (owner
of Brookside Glen Apartments).
Mr. Resner was present to represent the applicant and stated that
I) it had been his understandi. ng that a survey would be conducted
'and studied prior to any further consideration of this application
and 2) the applicant is willing to alter the proposed plans if the
Con~ission indicates that this is necessary.
Mr. W. L. Teepie, Jr., 14120 Alta Vista, Mr. Green, 14170 Victor Place,
and Mr. H. J. Oberhaus~ 14080 Alta Vista were present and stated their
objections to the proposed development.
After further discussion, Cormnissioner McFall reco~nended that Mr. Resner
call the Secretary for an appointment to meet with the Subdivision Com-
mittee for further consideration with regard to this topic'.
In view of the foregoing, Chairman Norton directed this matter .continued
.to the next regular meeting on 22 May 1967.
D. V-293 - Harry Maynard, Springer Avenue - Request for Variance in connec-
tion with Lot Size, Lot Width, and Frontage Requirements -
Continued from 24 April 1967
The continued hearing on V-293 was re-opened at 8:09 P.M. The Secretary
briefly reviewed this file and then read con~nunications from .1) May
T. Elliot, 14361 Springer Avenue 2) Eva L. Symon, 14361 Springer Avenue
3) John and Ernestina Gregorides, 14300 Paul Avenue 4) Margaret Sherrill,
14290 Paul Avenue 5) Mr. and Mrs. Max Frusterwalden, 41 Chester Street,
Los Gatos 6) Charles H. Martin, 14251 Springer Avenue and a petition
signed by fourteen (14) residents of Paul Avenue all filed in Opposition
to this proposed variance. He then explained an exhibit submitted by
the applicant just prior to the. opening of the meeting and read a con~-:~un-
ication from the applicant stating that all attempts to purchase additional
property from the adjacent property owner had been refused.
~F~e applicant was present but stated that he had. no further con~w. ent at
this time.
There was no one else present who wished to cormv~ent with regard to this
matter.
Co~aissioner Kasner read the report of the Variance Co..~.ittee relative
to V-293, recow~mending that sarae be denied.
After discussion, Cor~issioner Crisp moved, seconded by. Conraissioner McFall
that the public hearing on V-293 be closed; motion carried unanimously and
the hearing was closed at 8:24 P.M.
'3-
Planning commission Minutes of 8 ~y 1967 - Continued
II. D. V-293 - Continued
Conm~issioner Crisp moved, seconded by Com~issioner Johnson, that the
Variance Committee Report of 8 ~y 1967 relative to V-293 be approved
and that the request for a Variance be denied since the findings required
by Section 17.6 of Ordinance NS-3 could not be made; motion carried unanimously.
E. V-294 - Stephen Dimeff~ Saratoga Avenue - Request for Variance in Connection with Site Area and Lot Depth Requirements
The public hearing on V-294 was opened at 8:26 P.M. The Secre.tary advised
that Notices of Hearing had been ~iled and then briefly reviewed this
application.
Mrs. Wilbur Worden, Squirrel Hollow Lane, was present and stated that
her property ~,ms situated near the applicant~ and she had no objection
to the granting of the requested variance.
There was no one present to represent the applicant.
The Secretary stated that Mr. Wilson, Realtor and representative for the
applicant had notified him that he would be unable to be present for this
meeting, but he would be available to meet with the Committee at a later
date.
At 8:29 P.M., Chairman Norton directed V-294 continued 'until the next
regular meeting and referred same to the Variance Committee for study and
a report at that time.
Commissioner Kasner, on behalf of the Variance Committee, made arrangements
with other members of the Variance Committee to meet for an on-site inspec-
tion at 8:30 A.M., Saturday, 13 May 1967.
F. C-80 - Clarence W. Neale, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road - Informal Hearing on
Request to Add Additional Uses to the List of Uses Permitted
Under the Conditional Community'Commercial Zoning - Continued
from 10 April 1967
The informal hearing on this matter ~s resumed at 8:30 P.M. The Secretary
briefly reviewed this file and then read a letter submitted by the appli-
cant that 1) stated the need for the additional use 2) requested that the
uses previously applied for be withdrawn and 3) outlined the procedure
that he would follow to meet all the zoning requirements necessary to
bring his development into compliance with the Zoning Ordinance.
The Secretary then read the Staff Report pertaining to this matter, recom=~end-
ing'that the requested use (Saratoga Chamber of Commerce Office) be approved
subject to the conditions stated in the subject report.
The applicant, Mr. Neale, ~ms present and stated:
1) He cannot afford to have his rental units
remain vacant for any length of time.
2) The Art and Antique Shops ~aich are permitted
Uses in Neale's Hollow cannot pay the tariff
on the buildings.
3) He would post bond for Condition No. 3 of the
Staff Report of 8 May 1967 or deposit cash in
the bank in the name of the City of Saratoga to
cover expenses of same.
-4-
Plannin5 Commission Minutes of 8 May 1967 - Continued
II. F. C-80 - Continued
4) He has al~mys fmpr'ov~dany property
he has owned and will continue to
do so.
Mr. Cole Bridges, member of the'Chamber of Comanerce, w-as present but
stated that he had no comment to make at this time.
Chairman Norton observed that the problem seemed to be a question of
time with regard to granting M~. Neale permission to allow the Chamber
of Conmerce to occupy his building prior to compliance ~th all the
conditions stated in the Staf.f Report. He then advised that because
of the many problems involved with regard to this,application he
strongly recommends disapproval of any further Conditional Commercial
Zoning in the future.
Commissioner Crisp suggested that ~.~. Neale submit a letter requesting
that the uses listed in Condition 2, of the Staff Report of 8 M~y 1967,
be added to the List of Permitted Uses in the Conditional Co~ercial
Zoning thereby making their presence in the center legal.
After discussion, Commissioner McFalI moved, seconded by Commissioner
Johnson, that the publi~ hearing on C-80 be closed; motion carried
unanimously and the hearing w-as closed at 9:15 P.M.
Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Com.missioner Smith, that the
Staff Report of 8 May 1967 be approved subject to the following amend-
ments:
1)Compliance with Condition 2, of the Staff
Report, to be accomplished by making appli-
· cation to permit use of Village Couture and
Milerich Office in Neale's Hollow.
2) Compliance, by the applicant of Conditions
1, 3, 4, and 5, of the Staff Report to the
satisfaction of the Planning Director by
bonding or' other acceptable method.
3) Compliance ~,~th Conditions 1, 3, 4, and 5,
of the subject report prior to the Chamber
of Commerce occupying the building.
and that the requested use (Saratoga Chamber of Commerce Office) be
granted; motion carried unanimously.
G. MORTUARY FACILITY - Alan A. Alameda, Saratoga-~unnyva!e Road - Informal
Hearing on Request to Add Mortuary Facility to the
List of Uses Permitted Under the "C-S" (Commercial
Service Diserict)
Tee informal hearing on this request was opened at 9:20 P.M. The Secretary
stated that a Notice of Hearing had been published and then briefly reviewed
this application. He then read a communication from Abel M. & Leilla R.
Carreia filed in opposition to this matter.
PlanninS Commissioner Minutes of 8 May 1967 - Continued
II. G. MORTUARY FACILITY - Continued
The applicant Mr. Alan A. Alameda, ~s present and stated that:
1) A mortuary was needed in this area since none
existed at the present time.
2). The chapel would have a seating capacity of
approximately one-hundred and twenty (120)
people.
3) The mortuary would be about !8,000 square feet
in size.
4) The building would Be situated on a one acre
lot.
5) He now. operated a mortuary facility in San Jose.
6) The proposed plans included ample parking.
7) ingress and egress would be placed.so that they
would follow the flow of traffic.
~. Caleb, adjacent proper~y o~.mer, ~s present and stated that, consider~
ing th~ problems existing in this section of the City, a development of
this type would help to upgrade the general appearance of this entire area.
~k. Neale, owner of Neale's Hollow, stated that, as a progressive business-
man, he felt that ~his would be an asset to the City.
Commissioner McFall·suggested that the applicant contact the Planning
Department to arrange an appointment to meet with the Subdivision Committee
to further discuss this matter.·
After further discussion, Chairmaa Norton (9:36 P.M.) directed this matter
continued until the next regular meeting and referred same to the Subdivision
Comnittee for further study.
III. BUILDING SITES A~D SUBDIVISIONS
A. SDR-·674 - West Valley Baptist Church, Allendale & Fruitvale Avenues -
Building Site Approval - 1 Lot - Continued from 24 April 1967·
Mr. Delbert Harbold, Chairman of the Building Committee, was present to
represent the applicant and read a con~unciation requesting withdra~al of
the subject application and stating the reasons for same.
Commissioner McFall.moved, seconded by Coranissioner Kasner, that the
request for withdrawal be approved; motion carried unanimously.
B. SDR-685 - Dr. Michael Kowitz, Pike Road - Building Site Approval -
1 Lot - Continued from 24 April 1967
Commissioner McFall advised that a communication had been received from
the applicant requesting that this application be withdra~,~.
Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissioner Crisp, that the request
for withdrawal be approved; motion carried unanimously.
-6-
Plannin~ Commission Minutes of 8 ;.~av 1967 - Continued
Ill. C. SDR-688 - }larry Maynard S rinc, er -
, P o Avenue Building Site Approval
1 Lot - Continued from 24 A ril l°6
Commissioner Kasner reconm~ended that SDR-688 be rejected since
V-293 relative to this application has been rejected.
After discussion, Commissioner Smith moved, seconded'by Con~issioner
Kasner, that SDR-688 be denied; motion carried unanimously.
D. SDR-689 - Dr. C!en~n~er Peck, Ten Acres Road - Building Site Approval -
1 Lot - Continued from 24 A~ril 1967
Con~missioner McFail advised that a report had not been prepared since
the Subdivision Conimittee, after careful study of this application,
felt that a Variance is required.
~e Secretary then read a con~v~unication from the City Attorney
explaining why a Variance was unnecessary.
George Tobin, attorney,.present to represent the applicant, submitted
pictures of the physical condition of the subject property and stated
that:
1) In 1930 a start was made to construct
a residence on the subject property.
2) A portion of the structure was completed
with adobe brick and some of the unused
adobe bricks were left on the property.
These Will be used to complete the con-
struction of the main house.
3) The ZOning Ordinance as drafted has no
provisions whatever for accessory buildings
which are to be used as living accomodations
for held and this is something people in
this area have enjoyed for many years.
4) Since the City Attorney did not feel it was
necessary to file for a Variance, the Planning
Commission should not. require the applicant to
do so.
Commissioner i(asner stated if the opinion submitted 'by the City
Attorney had been requested by the Commission, it should then be
followed; however, since it had not, the matter should be re-submitted
for further consideration by the City Attorney.
Dr. Peck was present and conraended the Core~ission on the way they
conducted the Study Session'regarding the proposed Horse Ordinance
but criticized their procedure in reviewing applications before
them, especially his building site - SDR-689.
Mrs. Peck, wife of the applicant, was present and advised that
1) .the City of Monterey treasured old adobe brick homes 2) the
building, if completed, will be one of the finest constructed in
the City of Saratoga and 3) she did not see the reason for applying
for a Variance when they ~anted a building site approval.
Planning Co~nnission Minutes of 8 May 1967 - Continued
III. D. SDR-689 - Continued
Mr. tatter introduced himself and stated that:
1) }~ ass,~ned the City Attorney is paid
a salary.
2) As a taxpayer of Saratoga, he would
like to suggest that the City Attor-
ney's advise be followed and...
3) Since the Committee had the City Attor-
ney's letter prior to this' meeting, a
report'should have been prepared.
Chairman Norton 'stated the Cormnittee worked very hard and inquired'
what Mr. Garters connection was with regard to this application.
Mr. Carter explained that he was the realtor handling the sale of 'the
property and stated that the one house was originally built for the
Caretaker and that the guest house was built to accomodate the present
owners= of. the property, Mr. and Mrs. Jackson, while the main house was
under construction.
At this time, Comn~issioner McFall suggested that a recess be called
to discuss this matter.
RECESS AI~D RECONVENE
Ccn~nissioner McFa!l recoFmended that this matter be continued to the
next regular meeting to allow the Subdivision Conmittee time to confer
with the City Attorney to resolve this matter to their satisfaction
since the Committee felt that the City Attorney had, perhaps, been
misinformed.
He further stated that if the City Attorney's opinion remained the
same after their conference with him~ ~hen his opinion will be accepted
by the Cormnittee and a Building Site Committee Report will be prepared.
In view of the foregoing, Chairman Norton directed this matter continued
to the Meeting.on 22 I~y 1967.
IV. A. A-250 - Dr. Warren Sturla - Medical VillaSe - Lot 7.
The Secretary briefly reviewed this application and ez{plained that the
applicant would like to put three (3) buildings on this one lot in lieu-
of the one building allowed on one lot as stated in the conditions for
the Medical Village.
Dr. ~oram, present to represent the applicant, stated he did not want
to change the conditions and explained that this was in reality only
one building but a different style. He further explained ~
1) l~ae exhibits that had been submitted which
showed the building erected around an open
space area and...
2) ~at the .buildings could be connected if
necessar~ '~ut he.did not feel the aesthetics
would be as good.
-8-
Plannin~ Commission Minutes of $ May, 1967 - Continued
IV. A. A-250 - Continued
After discussion, Chairman Norton directed this matter continued to
the next regular meeting and referred same to the Design Review
Co,,-maittee for study.
B. A-251 - W. M. WilsOn, Verde Vista and Highway 85 - Final Design Reviex,; - identification Sign
The Secretary:
1) Briefly reviewed this application
2) Stated the applicant had permission {rom the property owner to
install the sign on this property and...
3) Recon~nended that approval be granted.
Con~nissioner Kasner moved, seconded by Conmmissioner Smith, tltat.
Final Design Review be granted in connection with A-251, W. M. Wilson,
for an identification Sign, as shown on Exhibit "'~" motion carried
unanimously.
V. CITY COUNCIL PCEPORT
Chairman Norton gave a report on discussion and action at the City Council
Meeting of 3 May 1967 with emphasis on items of particular interest to the
Cor, m~.ission.
VI. h~W BUSIneSS
None.
VII. OLD BUSI~ESS
Cora~.issioner McFall read the Report of the Sub Division Committee regarding
Consideration of the Apartment Problem and Rezoning Applications and then
requested that this matter be placed on the Agenda for consideration at that
time.
V II I.. CO1,'~UIViCATI ONS
A. WRITTEN
Chairman Norton read a letter received front the Good Government
Group info~m~ing the Conm~ission of a Resolution passed by their
Organization giving full support to the City Council and Staff
in their efforts to enforce City Ordinances and correct violations
thereof, specifically the Ordinance pertaining to signs.
B. ORj-T.
1) Doro,ahy Parker, member of the Good Government Group was present
and stated that it was hoped that the Sign Ordinance would continue
to. be strictly enforced.
2). Co,.~anissioner Kasner stated that Bro~m and !(auffn~ann had some
new signs for which no permits have been issued.
-9-
p~anninE Commission Minutes of 8 l~[a~,., 1967 - Continued
ViII. CO~D-,I~.~ICAI'IONS
B. ORz:~ - Continued
3) Commissioner Crisp stated that model homes in the Argonaut
Area had flags and other ornaments up to draw attention.
4) Mrs. Ottenberg, League of Women voters, advised that a new
Martinizing Establishment had 'their windows covered with signs.
The Secretary ez~piaincd that the building had no'P been occupied
to his kno~ledge and no Business License had been issued.
Mr. Galeb stated that the windowB were covere~ to conceal the
contents in the inside of the shop.
5) Cormnissioner johnson advised that the Barber Shop at the Big Tree
Shopping Center had a flashing sign.
6) rne Chairman acknowledged, with pleasure, the presence of Council-
man Burry,Dorothy Parker of the Good Govermn~.ent Group, Mrs. Ottenburg
of the League of Women Voters, Dr. Abrams, Dr. Sturla, and Mr. Galeb.
He also ~xpressed appreciation to Mrs. Parker for the coffee served
at recess.
IX, ~DJOUR~.FENT
Chairman Norton declared the Meeting adjourned at ti:10 P,M,
Respectfully. submitted, ,
,~_ ,~d~b'Z/~'.2,,,~,"j~?:~'~ ~t' ~f.z:,'}i~ ~-':~,
anley M ~alker, Secretary
Saratoga P i arming Co~T~i s s ion
-10-