HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-22-1968 Planning Commission Minutes (2) SUb~4ARY OF MINUTES
" CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION :
TIME: Monday, 22 January 1968, 7:30' P..M. ,. "
i'.. i" ..;.. PLACE: .City Council Chambers, Fruitvale.Avenue, Saratoga, Californi~
"' ~"':/""' :.::": "" ": .. Present: '..CommisSioners Crisp,' JOhnson'i Ka'sner,' McFall, Norton and
":."" ', !:.:':~ '." '~:" "' "' Comm~iSsioner McFa.ll moved, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, that
and that they be approved' subject to the following addition: .... · .... ....
'!' ~ "" "': "'Commissioner McFall read the report of the " .... "'.'
.: ...".': ~ .. . " recommending that 'the subject request in connection with 'C-80 be ,' ....
'. · .and expressed his pleasure at '.the acceptance of another appointment.' :
· "' ".' · to the Planning Commission by Commissioners Kasner and McFall.:.' He :.
..... · .... ' advised that Commissioner McFall may not be 'able to serve'a full term '
"" ~ .'." ',..'..:j.~.~ '... but his services would be valued for as ··10ng as ,he Could'remain on 'the ..
.. :.........'..".'. Commissioner McFall nominated Commissioner Nort6n as 'Chairman of 'the'
..~:":... . :::..:'... .Planning Commission for 1968. :'Commissioner ·Crisp moved, seconded by
· .. ': .'..' :..,. '! :CommisSioner Kasner. 'that nominations be closed;. motion carried with
· .'. 'Commissioner Norton abstaining. It was moved by Commissioner. McFall .
· .. :"- . and seconded by Commissioner Johnson that the Secretary be directed
..' 'j 'L':..'~ ....:...'....~.··to'record a unanimous ballot for Commissioner Norton as Chai.rman of
....... ~"' -'.." the. Commission fo~ 1968; motion carried' unanimously with Con~nissioner
,.'...' Norton abstaining. "..
: ... .'."....Commissioner McFall' nominated Commi~sioner Johnson as .Vice Chairman .:
· , . ::.'....'. ......... · of the Commission for 1968. commissioner Crisp·moved,· seconded by :
· ".'.".':' .:...". Co~,-,issioner Kasner. that· nominations be closed; motiOn"carried with
' . ."'." : .Commissioner Johnson ·abstaining. .It was moved by Commissioner McFall "
.....:.: ..... and seconded by Commissioner Smith that the Secretary be directed to'
'.: ::" '... record a unanimot, s ballot for COmmissioner Johnson as ViCe Chairnmn'"
'.= '. '.'.." of the Commission for 1968;'motion 'Carried unanimOuSly ·with Conunissioner '
· ...... · .. ; .. · Commissioner McFall nominated Stanley,: M. ·Walker. Planning"DlrectOr,. as :'
": ....~' "' " Secretary of the Commission for i968.·. Commissioner Crjisp moved~."seconded'~'."':
':~:."...' by Commissioner Kasner, .that nbminations be ~losed; .motion carried unant-.'i..':!~'.'~.
:' '.. ~.... :':'! ' moUsly. It was moved by' Commissioner McFai. l' and :seConded '..by' Commissioner :!.Z... "~'j'..i
"..:.'" !' '.'.."' 'Smit'h that the Secretary 'be directed. tO'r'ecord 'a unanimous ba].'l,Dt,'for ~:".1.'!. ~.'.
': . L"' . Planning: Commission Meet ins .- 22 January' 1968 - Continued
;...~,','.:. ""..' '~.; ....'. Commissioner CriSp moved, seconde'd by Commissioner Johnson, .that the
.... . Commission express its appreciation· for the·services rendered in the
. ......'...·past year by. Stanley M. Walker·, Planning Director. Gary Bonfiglio
..... "' .: Assistant Planner, Joan· Loher,, Steno-Secretary; motion carried unani-
.. :' ..' ", Chairman Norton stated· ~a~ 1)' Commissioner McFall r~quested to be '... "'
"" relie~ze~ from the position of Chairman of the Subdivision Committee
:"'!""','.'~' 2) ·Commissioner Smith would be'the new Chairman 'of the 'Subdivisi0n' '~.
.......!.~./...:.'.....'...'=.~..7"Committee and.'3) if anyone else wished to be relieved from their .
.z ~ '·present Committee" appointment 'they s~ould Contact Chairman..Norton;.j. "'=~
· ~" ~ ..... . otherwise~ no other Committee 'change8 will be made.. ".. . ;.:.: ..
':' A.. GENERAL PLAN REVIEW - ~ajor ·Review for 1968· .:
~'.7.........'.. ... The public hearing relative to the' General Plan Revie~..~ras opened' .:. ...
.,i='.'." ... at 7:40 P.M. Chairman Norton briefly reVieWed this file· and then "' ..
"""" ""' Z. requested' the Secretary to read the communications in the file. '..
~:,~i~ ..../." ... ".7. The Secretary read 1) a petition (with 59-signatures) submitted by.
· ... '...< .. :. '7 . the residents of the Shadow Oaks area 2):. a petition with .93-signatures .:" ..
::...'.".""=:..."/'. ..:'Z'.' ': from residents .on Herriman Avenue and streets Connected· .or near tO
· . : Mr &Mrs Ronald .L. Zaitz and Mrs 'Katherine Higgins all op'pc, stng the !=.'~-~'.~."'!'..~
· ' ~'~ ...... . " Herr iman AVenue extension as proposed by the General Plan. "He. then .;, 'Z"]~~. .i .'~"',:'.:~
"" .... : '1) read a p~tition ~with 58-signatureS) submitted by the"reaidents of:";'
~.'..'...!..L'. '.' be turned· into a Collector· S~reet and 'suggesting" two aiternate~:
. .z" :.'..!..'.....:'...,., ~. ·Welch protesting the development. of the Stoneson pr0perz~y on !Big '~isin Way:
.'.,.:.!L= "'!~"iZ~.~.i.!."....'Z'.'...".i:....'...'' . Gatos-Saratoga Road, requesting that. their property be'incorpOrated into
=~ '. 'the General Plan for use as'. a Sr. Citizen Retirement 'Community or upper
:":"i':"" ""' "j"" "":' rental garden apartments and 5) ·read a communication'from. Miss 'A.
· . to Bank Mill Road as shown in. the General Plan.' " '.
:':"" "'~ '. 'The Secretary: then ·adVised that Dr' Cooley had contacted· .'him by phone"~".
· ..':.'~."..'~:~.."'... '.:' .." to p~otest the ·MUlti-Family Residential Zoning for. the Maxmar".propertyj . .
· . '= =.". :' · : and' suggested that the.property be developed as "R-l".' (Single Family ..
" ....L ....<' "' ";"" "' ::'-""' Chairman Norton asked Roy 'Cofer of LiVingston and Blayney.to e2~p'lain why"~'!:J: .." ..
· ...' Mr. Co.fer stated he was Sorry '~. Livingston could not be'.present and
.: ....""'..'. :..,"" ll0-cars during peak hours in.'the 'peak direction· 2) Herriman with the
'.3) the increase be.ing .'partially due' to the increase of s=tudents. in .the' .'. ""
! 2.~' =2.:!'i~ Zi<.'.~..L..'L . ."..·College traffic· is actually anticipated :for Herr.iman Avenue· and' 5).' :the.
' .. ·college students using the Her~iman Avenue'· extension wi'll be the' students·
~' .~ ".:.~..'~ .' .. : . .,
-.. .. . .
...".: "' Plannin~ Commission F{eetin~ - 22 January 1968 -. Continued. ."
. ':'..; '~..'...'"...... ". ...' ,.
· .' .' ; · Chait~n Norton advised that the Herriman Avenue extension Will
· ' ~ ' .
~ '~. Co~er added that the' Harriet AVenue extension would greag.ly...
.'.:'.'. ';. ;' ..· :'.': relieve the traffic at the intersection of Fruitvale and Saratoga.,
..... -"' .= Avenues. He. also. explained. that Russell ~ne ~s pr'op6sed as a
:...'. :. .... 50-foot collector street in the General Plan Revision of .1962 ....... ".:~
' 2~ ...~.'. "'~.=~'. ";"· : Chairman Norton clarified that';Russell ~ne haS' never bead proposed
~ ~ '.-. .' as a .30-foot .street as Buggedted 'by some' people...-: ..'.:. ... .. ..
., '...:... ' .... "The Secretary explained' that .'the 50-foot street includes' th~ cight-of?~y
......... and i8 not all pdvement. · '. ....
. " : ~. '~e'w ~nce. '20622 Russell ~n'e. expressed concern that the street :...
...;.~' ...:......, : '. '....widening proposed for Russell ~ne would destroy landscaping provided .'
' ..'.~
" ".~ . City and they can do what th'ey ~nt to with it even though' it has' been.~'~.'~"{.'~..:~~:
' · · '~la'ndscaped. He added that he does not blame 'the residents.of Russell '.='. { ~'~;'~ .' .";' ;. ;.'~
~ne for being upset about loSing.Some of their l~n.d8ceping but the. :~:'j;:;': ;}"'. '/~.~'.
~. ~rl Unsera stated that i) ' he and other 'raBidcat'S 'of"R~'SSel"l:~a~'q'.~=~.'
· '~':~ ~':." .. did not feel that widening R~ssell ~[ane ~s a logical soltx~io't{ since..
~' ;'~ ""';""". ;"' ""' .~uld not provide dhe' area with a good collector street and:'the bridge' · ': "
".'~:..." '~ .....'~" "' """ of a subdivision in the Verde Vista area. 4) if the. City. would take
.. '....~ ~. ~ ; over Verde Vista the residents Would not be 'burdened with the up-keep
any long'er and 5). ~lle 'driving around in this area it seems more .'
~Z '; :.'.;: logical. to go do~ Verde Vista rather than Russell ~ne'. ..
: .". ','. ~.. 'C0fer'~ in' answer to an inquiry' .fr~ chair~n Norton, sis'ted 'that ~"
,;~. ~ ' 'has' gr0~. fr~.it8 f0'rmer population of..about' 16.000 people and is "
-.....': ': .. ...:: ~ ' .'....... . . . .. ~. .: ·
} .. '.., ..
· ".'-':'."" ':' " area of Sarat0'ga and thus 'requires a 'wider' street at. the.~onneCtion...
.... ,. .' '~ich' resulted .in.'lo~-density'; thereby reducing tr'afficj '...... " . .-
..;~...... ... =. ~'.. - .. couldn"t. po8sibily cost .any more' to' develop .'as a 'collector street than ' .
~.. '.: · :.....~'... ..'.'.. · ,.. · · . . ..
~.. :.
. .'.. .' '. . ...j.. . . . · . ...... :. · .
... ... . , ~. ..~...'..... ..
'... .' . ., ·
~ ... .. ...
· "." .. Planning Commission MeetinS - 22 JanUar~ 1968 - Continued
i:.' := ~' ;' ; II. A. GENERAL PLAN REVIEW -'CONTINUED .... ·
'..."' j':::'.'~:."'" Chairman Norton 1) directed the Planning Director· to study the
· ~ the matter of comparative costs and produce. some figures by the
2 '. ~ ...in "the area is developed then the subdivider will be required to
,' ~'. ~ : Mr~ Charles MaClean stated that 1) the people on Verde ViSta groan
.~ .i?i,..::::~'. everytime they are asked to pay for improvements 2) he fe~t a lot of
,..'.'...: .... '.,=' ".. . these people would be happy to give this street to the City and 3) he
~:...~:.........,....j..... .. .. wondered if it was the policy of the Planning Commission and City Council
-"!'j "'~;~'.'. "not to spend monies to get .a'street that .would be' more suitable for
· ' .".',';.':. '.: :'....'.~ Mr.' Jerry Loher, Saratoga Foothills' Development,. explained that people
.;:' .."""'~ ':"=" on Russell· Lane might wait for' ·approval· of SD-729 since some improve-
: "'!:?.'.".:. . "' : merits wi. ll be made on Russell' Lane as part· of the subdivision ·
":'~ ': .'. Commission. could prevent ·Russell Lane from becoming a collector street.··
~::i' '.'.!.'.."'.'...'.: '.:!:. "" Mr. Cofer, in. answer to an inquiry ,from' Chairman Norton,. stated that '.
· :7.' , "..'.' /,.';'.Z '.' he was .not aware of the proposed .subdivision at'. the' time the. General ..... ':
"..' "' .... : Chairman Norton 'suggeste~ that the City Administrator provide some ,,
· "i"'. ':' L.' . .' "figures showing the difference 'in cost for. developing Verde Vista :
'.'.:: ........ " .Mr M. O. Lee, Harleigh Drivd' ' stated. 'that if the right-'0'fLwny on' '.':
.' The SeCretary explained that the new section of' Russ'ell-Lane".Would be
· ' -'.-...':"... :.'.' ' .. Chairman Norton advised that th'e 'City· does not plan' to ta'ke any' more '. "
· : "' .:' '. '. right-of-way. from property .owners' on Russell
.. :..... '... Mr. Unsera,' ·inquired· if he could be assured (i.f"'Verde. Vista were··
...' :..":'. :'. '.'., developed as'a street with a'50-foot right-of~way).Rh.sseii Lane would
......... '.:' Chairman Norton answered that the' Planning· Calmmission' Gou~ld not make "
. "" "'. : ..... such a committment under .any conditions. '." :...
'~. =.' .. '..' .=.The Secretary, in answer to an inquiry from Mrs'. Miller, .stated' that
'..' ';~ ':""'. ="' ..". '-."" "the improvements on Russell Lane ·would not necessarily'. be paid for by
... , :......" . .... '. · an assessment district as·Stated·in the' General ·Plan· Report,:.' but would - ..
'~ '.....' Mr. Metlet, 19980'Lannoy 'C0u.r'.t~ stated 1) he. wa's.:speaking on behalf ..:
.... """ ""' ':: ' " ".".. 'of the ~esidents on Herri'man'Av. enue 'and 2)" the residents of' Herrinmn :
';...'.~ .. . ....did. not 'understand what .bene'f~its they would fre'ceive' from. [he extension"~ · ....
Planning Commission Meetin[~ - 22 January 1968 - Continued
II. A~' GENERAL PLAN REVIEW - CONTINUED
"".-.. "" . ... Chairman Norton explained that they would benefit by not having
· ... ". """' '= use the overcrowded Saratoga and Fruitvale Avenue intersection.
'-~; ' ' ' ~. Marlet inqt, ired 1) if there will be evening College· traffic
.... · ' 2) where the information pertaining to. revenue was obtained and
' 3) why Fruitvale Avenue is not, considered for improvement rather
· · than Herriman Avenue. '. .
'.': .."Z-'." . .. Chairman Norton explained 'that 1)"evening activities .at the college
': .... "":" ?. are being dis'cohraged but traffiC.will still be heavy at .peak 'hours
· .. ':...]:..'. :,.. . and 2) Fruitvale Avenue is scheduled for improvement.' .."
.f" . ] -..."' .~'. '.. ". Mr. Corer furthe~ explained that 1) 'the .peak hours will be 'between'
,'.. ."' 8:30 and 9:00 A.M~. and 2)'· the rev. enue.'estimate. was based on population
... ;..L...... ..." '.' of the ·City in future·years and on past records. .. .
'.'-- ' .....':: Mr charles MaCle~n stated that 1) the Saratoga High School ~tudents
." L.' .'. "'.'.' .." .. will go speeding down Herriman even more .it the extension becomes a
"" .... reality 2) the people will s'oon realize· that they can cut down Herriman
..........].. · '."Z;' to reach Mountain' View and Cupertino and 3) he' felt Allendale Avenue . . ..: ....
'. ." ' should be extended through· property already owned by the City..
. ". .... " "Chairman Norton directed 'the. ·Public works Department .t'0 'check 'this
.... '.' ..... ... Mr. Cofer adViSed that Herriman Av'enue would not 'serviCe. th'e proposed
'..!." z.~" .'..'.".'~' . grade school and t~e "'existing Junior high 'school in that ca'se
'.' """""' ':'" · '. "'Mr "Maclean stated that these students~really did 'not need 'a'servtce ~ '!'.."
Mr. Gil 1 ertso . ated. that 1) if. Herriman ,Avenue· 'is 'extended ~' "'.!'~ '] ."'.j~!'= i~.:
bridge is difficult now and will be more .difficult after'~th~i
· is constructed and 3) 'another ·five minute· wa'i~'will""'not =in.co,ivenience !.'.' .!'!~"!"Z,'~!?!!".
· ....: ,.. ....... .... Mrs. Woody What!ey, suggestedl. that all that was'.necessary'.to"handle eh'e
..... ;.' - ..' '. .. '.. 'was 'a walkway and not a service. road of the type. that woul'd be provided by
..... Mr.. Maclean stae'ed tha't a sOlution.would be for the 'City' to 'increase its
· · .... .:.~ .. ' ..'f/traffic ·cOntrol by hiring deputies at Herr. iman :Avenue during.the.peak
"'f :' ~: .. Chairman Norton advised .that'Zthi's" would be an increased eXpens'e 'for. '; '.'
"..: '='. Mr.' RObert Van' Der Toorren. P'lannihg C'0nsUltan't stated·. 1)"' ':~e represented '.!L
'. '!~ .. ... should be'. considered as part.Of. the' General .Pla'n and..'4) 'he would ·like··
· . to obtain Mr. Livingston"s opinion on th"e matter... "' .- .. .. !..
'.:z'..."-...:.. ....". ......~ 'The Secr'etary. explained 'th.~t due ~o'a ma'tter 'of. economi~s' Mr' Livi~gs~on'.L'.' '
: Planning Commission 'Meet].nF~ - 22' January 1.968 - Continued
'L .... .' .. Mr. Van Der Toorren further. Stated that 1) the City had an obligation
.; ". · to help the merchants increase their.business and one way to do this
.. ,.. ..z. ....':.' .. ... would be to .solve the parking problem 2) the Quito area needs up-grading
' ' " and expansion 3) the Quito area offers.'a nice quality of service but the
= '."..: :"' shops are all too small 4) 'some of the Professional Zoning in the area
· ' '.'.~ :.:..' .. '.'! :.. should be changed'to Commercial '5) the students of ,the West Valley
'. '.." .. Junior College will require 'some' facilities. such as ice cream parlors';
· . .' laundries, and snack shops nearby' 6)..it i.s. tim~ to consider ~at "
"
~::~'="-..' ":'. should be done with 'the.~ggorie property (located on the corner .of
. {.. ..... ~ ' .
?'...... '... Cox and Saratoga Avenue) and' 7). 'this property .would .be suitable for~
+' ""~""":""' ": Chair~n Norton suggested that '~. Van Der Toerren put his B'Uggestions
into a brief statement and submit it. to the Planning Director .
.... . ~. Van Der Toorren then stated that ~) he felt. the Visitor Co~ercial.
....... is'-a good idea' 2). bowling alleys, skating rinkb, .motels, and antique
.... . ..~. shops were not compatible" in ehe same shopping center. '
· : ... z. "..'. : ~. John J. ~yes, Jr. ,'attorney,' stated that he ~s concerned about
...: . · the Visitor Co~ercial Zoning 'and inquired if all the uses.already
= '~'..".""""" permitted in the C-S Zone would be included in the Visitor' Co~ercial.
..... · L'.~ ='' The Secretary stated that' the Visitor' C~ercial 'uses wuid be in addi-
: ."' ""' ~. Guenther ~choe, Ronnie Way, inquired how co~unity .park. ~uld
.... "." . 'affect traffic on Frditvale and Saratoga Avenues? '
"=""""~' ' ...'~'~, '. ' "' ~. Cofer answered that.' the residents using this park dl'l have' to
· ~ .. '-' ".. " ~. ~choe inquired 1) if a. savings could be realized by locating parks
".,'.'.~2~'::.'.".~.'..'."'"' ... closer' to schools and 2) '~at the.projected traffic .~s for the c~ner
". " ~. 'of Saratoga and Fruitvale Avenues? .' "
-.' . ..' ..i; . .' ' ' · ' '. .. . ' '. .. . ' "
"j "' '.' "' "" . ~ corer angered that it would not .be beneficial to locate parks .'
.... · =.... :' '.' " near schools and 2)' the projected traffic across the Saratoga inter-'
· '....' ".'.....:. section at the peak hour in the peak direction is 900-vehicles and · '.
...... =. ..' the projection across the 'Fruitvale-Saratoga intersection at the peak
· ""/" '7"'~' '~"' l{r. J. F:.. Cage, Shadow Oaks ~Qay~ s'ta{:ed t}mt the path~i;ay's 'proposed
· "."" .' .' for. over the P G & E right-of-way will cut across property' belonging
. ". ': '.2= '.',...L.. .....' to him and wondered if the pl'anning Co~ission was' axgare of this.
..... .. .- Chairman Norton' explained. that 'pathways would not be'. 'd~veloped. if it.
. :'~ z ' .."'..'.' ...' . ' '. 'The 'Secretary explained · that .the' easement referred. to is ' not the utility
"'.~'..z..2~ ..'. '.... ." easement. but.instead refers to the easement aion~ the. larger.. tower'
· .. :.... along the railroad to.Hi. ghwa~ 85 and near Paul ~laSson.
'..'" "' ' ' .. 1,ir. Madhoe stated .tha~ zthe General Plan' indicated. .a .golf course for
· . '=" ~.' .":"'.'.'~. Saratoga and' then inquired ~b0txt the affect such a golf course would
. . · .... . '.. ..... .. . ... . .... ... '..' ... .,. · ...~.
.... . .. .. . ..,-.
'.: . ·
· .. . - .
..
.. .. '. ! .,
..
.' . ·.
..
'.' Planning Commission Meetin~ - 22 January 1968 - Continued
"' ....;" : . II. '.A.' GENERAL PLAN REVIEW'- CONTINUE ..
".. '.' :. Chairman NortOn advised that sometimes golf courses are prov]..ded ·
i;'.Z'';'" "' ..... · · by building subdivisions around them' and in that way having the
· ' .~ .'.i' ·
.....,... .,. . · ~ . ..., .
"' ...."' " Commissioner Johnson ·eXplained' thai the zoning laws would not need·· '!. "."
". '." to be al'tered too much since about the same amount of homes will be
...... :... permitted but will be arranged in such· a way that part of the. property
'..',' .. .' ." will be used for a' golf ·course..
, '.~:.... ., . .' , . '., .
, Z ': '~."'.' ...."" '. · "' ' .... ' '.' '
,':..'.: ....... :'': ." ~.. Mr. 'Galeb, Sr. '~tated. that' 1) th~ Sarat0ga'~esident'S should do some- "
'~"' '~' ':"j"' :' thing about th'e' probl'ems inherited from the past by approach'ing them.'
~':.~":':".:'.""' "" "' with an' open-mind and 2) he' was community minded and is trying to "
:. !: ;," improve his property and has improved to his financial disaster ":
...., ... . . .. · · ; · .. ..
· .:.:.:. :'.. ':..:' · ... Dr. Abrams requested that the report made-by Ri.che~:: Research relative'
· ': ".. .'..-'.: ... to .the. Quito area be incorporated' into the General Plan..·· '. "..
~ ..'. · . .
o. ': ....L'- "..".. Chairman'Norton stated' that this ·request could be taken. into consid~:r ....
....~.~.~... : ation ,by the General Plan Committee and then closed ~he hearing (9:20
...: .... ""..,.. P.M.) and directed the hearing relative to the General Plan continued
: :' '...:.......'.. to the next regular meeting.· . :' ....
;"'.......... '..... f ..,, :.' .'. '.
""' ':""':". "' ."' · B. UP-143 - PaCific Shore PrOperties,. via Roncole - Request for"Use'Permit ·
· ...~ · ..... .. · . . . - ..
· "..~.. :'..: " for Model Home Sales Office·
"':i.:.'.':. :.'...'..'!:. The Chairman opened ~he hearing at. 9:42 ~.M. The Secretary 'stated that
.... the Notices of Hearing were mailed and then briefly reviewed' this file.
".'Z'."i'.;"' "":':' ':' " """ ' "' " : ' ' ' ': ' ' '
..... ." Mr. Glen Krumme, President of Pacific Shore 'Pr6pert~es; was' present and"
""!":""~'~!;:" "" ":""""' :'. stated that they expected to complete this subdivision in approximately.
.... '. '... ' '-' '. twelve m0nths; · . .. .....
': ."' Commissioner" McFall e. xplained that the"Same use has b'een requ'esteh and
~. ". '~ approved once previously.· . .
· ...:. ...."" '.'. The Secretary read the staff' Report recommending that the' subject'request
· ' for model home sales office be ·granted for. One year subject to' the pro-.
:""'~"':'~.'~""" ""' hibition 'of·any use as a construction yard
· .. .: ..~.' . .., . · . . . .
. .~: .::?' ~.'. :." ..... NO one.else.'in the aUdienCe wished to comment.' · '
· .;.. T. ... .'.
'.'7!. ~..:~i '. :."' that the hearing relative to UP-143 be closed; motion carried unanimously.
:' ~:,...!.....;. Commissioner McFall moved, seConded.by Commissioner .Smith, that the
!."' ....;.:..:...'."" . Staff Report of 22-J~nuary 1968, relative to UP-143,. be adopted and·the
: ' ' .':'.Use Permit be/~'~nted for. one year subject to .prol~ibition'.Of any.'use '
.. ' ':" '...: ""'!. "of sales off~ce-a~: conStruc~tion yard in..accordance with.Section 16.6
"..:"...' .. of Ordinance NS-3; motion carried unanimously; . ".
" . .: ".. C.'. UP-144 - C S I. DevelOpment. Company, Scu'ily'Avenue -'R~'quest 'for Use '.'
· ." · · Permit for Model Home Sales ·Office· :' ." '. :.
':.."..~",.'.-. '... :' 'The hearing for UPi144' was ·opened· at .9':'50 '.P.M..'..Tlie '.SeCretary stated
':'.' :.2 .'i .~'.j' ' ..... ...that the Notices of Hearing·were mailed 'and then'.brie'fly.:reViewed .,.:
... ~..~ .....'. this application. · · .. ' "-". · ..
...... .. ~:"'. .... .......'.' ,.
".L', "'."'. ". '.' :. . ...'. '. ". '.'.' . " "' '.' ': .... ' '
" " .Z · ..' ...L. " . .: .. ·
"":"" ' " ' ' '" "' ' ' . . -7 ... . '. ",. z'..".'. : ·
. ' · " ' ~ .:'" ' .... ' '; . " ' ;. . ! .; 'L' .. :.
..2.~ j ~ '... . ..: ..... ... ..... · .
. .... . . ,.. .:..2..'... .... . .."
· . ~" :.' ~ ,~: .'... . : . ......: ? . · ., : .
. · . . · .
':" ....... ." ....... °" ".' i "'. ' ' "' ~."" ' ' :.' "'. ~ - . ' ..: . ' ."'
" " ~'.'..~'.1
..- ...,'.., 'Plannin$ Commission Minutes - 22 Janu.ary ].968 - Continue'd'
"':"' ".- No one. ~ras present to represent the applicant .and no one from the
~ .~" .. audience wished to comment.
".".".' ':. .. The S~cretary read the ·Staff RepOrt recommending. wttl'~ concurrence
'
of the Subdivision Committee. that this Use Permit be granted for
· .~.......
one year subject to prohibition.Of any use as a construction yard.·
".. 'i""' '?.''' ': ""' :" Commissioner McFall explained tha't this is the first ·request' for'
· . a s~les office in this development.. "
"...~':..2 ....' ....... .. .... . .~ .. · .'....'; .. .g.
..... ":!':"' After discussion·. Commissioner Johnson moved. seconded· by ConnniSsioner
"
.~.......=2. ...'..'.. Smith. that tile public hearing be closed (9:53 P.M.) relativ6:.'to UP'144;.
':
· .. .....'...~.... motion carried unanimously.'. .' '. .' .. :.. .~..
!.: :...
... .. . . . . . . .. .:.~
.',-
':': ":.':" "" '="' ' ' t'hat the Staff Report·· of 22 ·JanUary '1968, relative. to. UP-.ll+.~+~ '!.'be 5'.'.. '. i:'~"!i~ii'~i!::".{
." ~:"
· ' ',' ' · ii'. '.'., ' !~!.' "'. ,, .{ ,;~.
. =. · · ..-.......: . . ' · . ..' · .. . · .' .. . .: . ,.. :.!'.: .....~ ', ,: .... : . . .
.... " .. '.. D. UP-145 -' George .W. Day. Ranfre Lane and Saratoga .AvenUe' ~' F. eq,',est"for
.
: ...... · ...... Use Permit for Model Home Sales Office "" " " ' :' '
· ~' 'j":;:""';" :"'~"' The hearing on UP-145 was opened· a.t 9:54 P.M. '.The Secreta'r'y stated
· ":': :"""' "" '.. "the Notices of .Hearing were mailed '.and ·briefly ·reviewed this file.
j. '...!...~"e'. ... "' Mr. Harris. 'present to represent the applicant. stated ~hat 1) there
· : ." "........' "j: .! are six (6) homes ~r~sently Under construction in th'is subdivision and
· "" ' " """ three (3) mo~e lots making a total of nine (9)'homes which should be
· '.':'..'. j..... .....'.". .. ....., .
:..!..':..' ..... '. finished in about one (1) year at"which time this sales office will be
'..... '. " sold. He then explained (in ·answer to an inquiry from ~trs John Elliot
· :' ..... : .... 'L ." '.:'.' of Ranfre Lane) that .all the" lots were located in the Kentfield subdivi-
:i..' .~.'. ~.....';:'..~....~ . . .. ,.
....:.~.. '.~:'.' .. :..'.. .. .... Mrs. Elliot request· that the :·subdivisiOn display a more subdued sales ".~ '
· .'......' ,L ..' .' ' ' "":'". ·."' s iga .. '. '!. ' '. · .'='"
"" '
· ! i . he.'Secretary read' 'Staff: Report reco ending' that the req e,t for
· model home sales office be granted subject to·the conditions· 'stated.'i~'
; · ... said report .... · '. .... '
· ' .... " .' .. '..' '2 . .' '.
" :"':':".' :"" "' j~ : "':.. "":!""". Chairman Norton directed ~ha~..the'report"'be amended .by. adding the',~ '...
":':""~':":' ":; "" ':" ~"" j""" '. following co.dition:.' '... ' "' :' "..,~.: .' .";'j.".:
.
... "../":"="!':. =' 3). any use ·in'connection with'any other subdivision., ·
..."j :..: .,:.~ '.. '.' .' "" : . be prohibited. ' ' .' , ..
..": .':.i:! ':"...' ..... '. ..
~' "'!;'" :~""' : · "'. ." .. Commissioner' JohnsOn moved. s~conded'by Commissioner Smith to.'~close
:".:.~':.':...' ." :' .'.= ;"" : the hearing for UP-145; motion carried· unanimously and 'the hearing'was
. ' ..... . .... '. " closed at 10:00 P.M. '.' ' '. . ....
"" .... .'." 1' .. " Commissioner McFall moved seconded b'y Commissioner 'Cri'sp., tha~ the
'~ ".';"'. '..:.. ~..." Staff Repor[ of 22 '.'January 1968 in connection with UP-145 be adopted
:...2'.~. ':~ ':~.: ..... "as amended,.'and the ,Use Permit be granted subject to..compliance with :"
· .'!.:"' "' ' "'. all applicable ·proVisionS·' of ·Ordinance· NS-3, .'Section 16.6; m'otion':"
..:~..~..'~.' ..:'~...57...::.~'.....'...' · carried unanidlously.': .'-.: '." ' ". · .. ". ' ". , ,.j'.. '.. ". :' .' .. j: '
....'..i'... RECE S AND RECONV E =. ' · · " : " "; '..~".'. '. "" '. ;.,,
· · . ".' ....
' . . .. ...'Z. : ....
· '.' .... :"Z "' '. .... ' .. ... ' !..'
"' '
· ... . . .........
.. ;..
· ~' ....j ...... ,. : ' . .-...' . . . . ....
, , . ..'...'.!
"' Z '" " " '. '.'"
. . .: · .... ..-. . .. .~.
'~..:= .': .. . / . .. . : . ·
. ~ ..
· "' ..... ' ' ':" 2..." ' " "' ' "'.' ..... ' .. ' " ........
: ". ........
.... ~:, ..... ~. . ·
'. PJ..qnning Cor,m~is~';ion Meeting - 22 ..January 1'968 - Cont:Lnued
· , :""'.."' Ill. BUILDING srlqEs AND SUBDIVISIONS
'.'~:~ ...... 'A. .SD-729'- Saratoga Foothills. Staten Avenue and Verde Vista -. '
~.. ~' '. ".": Subdivision Approval - 39 Lots - Continue~ from 8 January 1968 '~ .', ":',
"Conm~issioner McFall 'pOinted :ot~d. tha. t condition 11 of the Sub,J:ivisi'on'.
· .' and the following Note l~c 'addcol to the. SubjeCt report: ....
:" ..... The C0~ittee points out that a portion of the area' ShOwn ~"""" "" ..
on the curr.ent tentativ'e map is under .'consideration'by. the .' ~ · ;"
' ' The Secretary, ,in answer to an inquiry' from Chairman Nort6n'. stated ·
""" ' ' ': Con~issiOner McF'all stated 'thati the 'Subciivision Con~nittee met 'With the ' '
.... : ' i. Planning. Co~ittee of the' City :Council.". and it is 'underStood. ~hat~ the ..
':.". .. development of this subdivision is agreeable ~Ubject'.to the City. work'
: ...: .:. ing out terms with the ,subdivid'er not 'to start construCtiOn. inm~ediately....ii:
'i ........ · 'that he' had no further .co~nent~ relative to this matter 'sinCe.he fel~..':,'~..~ .l'.
".. "..' Conunissioner ~risp advised' that COndition'-. 5 .of the 'SubdiVisi6n Corn.' .:
'::'~.'~""'." ' ..~' ..'~e SeCretary e~plained th'at this is covered in the. St~ndai-d'.Engineering '~. ..
. '-'..Conditions referred to in Condition ~..1' of the' 'subject report... :.: . . .
'..: "." '.. Cbaiman Norton th. en directed that Conditlon"-'7 of the-aubject 'repo'rt ':
" "" :" "7 ImproV'e pedestrian 'walkWay' to school 'along t~e eastern 'Side 6f'L0t 6.
,. ... "' 'as approved by the DirectOr of .Public Works ....... · '.' ."~ '. ........... ' .......................
· ':.'.' "" 'i'.". ..'.. A resident of Malcolm ,stated' th'a.t 1). he did not like the. idea o.f Staten
,~. '.'....'."' "" .... going thrU to Verde Vista but would. rather' see a..cur-de-sac at the corner
· ~:: '.~: ." ": ': and 2) there have .been probletn's (at the .cOrner of Staten and. MalcOlm)" '
~"'. ': ;. · "... .. 'with motorcycles and spedding and t~is '.is' not safe 'for 'childrex~' playing ..'. ..
:" ". ::' " Chai~an ~Iorton advised that for safety reasons and emergency x~'ehicles;· "
'. it was necessary .to connect Ver~le vista and Seaton. 2) .the' City iS 'adverse '.
.. ' to creating any.more. blocked :off .s'tree~ than is' necessary and' 3) 'even ':" ·
· .. .. if the subdivider suggested 'c0ns'truction' of the road w~'thout .conne'Cting
it, the Planning Co~nission.would have to ask him to change it.
" : Cor.~issioner Crisp e:<plained that..the:SubdiviSion Ordinance' requires a · ·
,.. .... subdivision to have. two means o~ 'acCe'~s .and the' Plan'aing C0n~nisSion cannot"
· .' ....f ...7~ The Secretary. in answer to an .5.n'c~Uiry....stated that tlie 'par~ may provide ..':
'..' .Co~issioner. crisp '.stated that yery 'few" ca'rs 'Wo~ld 'use ..Such'a road... ..
"z" .PianninS Commission Minutes - 22 Januar7 ].968 - Continued
...
'.!"'. '.""'... "' .- Chairman. Norton inquired if there would be double access for fire
· ..[],~= ......l j". "..Tl. '. trucks and would the exit from .the school be such that [raffic.j. drainage from
· .....!"." .'.j .. the subdivision-park would be feasible.. '
.". ~:~ · 'The SeCretary answered that ~'.ccess 'could' be developed at the north .east
...... '.[= '.'. .... Corner of the school ground but this would not be the ideal way.
".' '?=" "' "' "Mr. jerry Loher, app'licant, .stated'.that in a similar. Subdivision the
· ' :"..i.'.-. ~'....'.......... principal of the s~hool was not' interested in' having two (2) access
· '.'='~""'~' '~" .. ' .... .' roads'because' of controlled parking and suggested that 'the pathway
· "' .... · .... or pedestrian walkway be widened instead ... '. -. '.
· "' "'" ' ' ' "~" . .. .'.' Chairman Norton i.ndicated. that .the real iprobiem was one. of"s~'fe~y
'~ "'
".' ~.'.." .' ' "" ' and inquired if the City had a policy' relative 'to providing more than '=~
"=' ', !." quired only the widening of 'the..pedestrian walkway... ' .'..
'..
"'l' """" "[ ..... ~"'="": Chairman Norton agreed ·that w~dening the walkway to 12-fe~t so that ": ~ '!"'
a .fire truck would be able. to get in might be better than a double' '"
"~'..,'~.." '.! Mr".' Bernie Tdrgeon stated. that there would be a 14-foot' easement in ,'.
:.i' ""
. '; .. '. .... · ..... all since 1-foot would. be used .on' each side for a fence. ,. .....
.'i ....
~'~ ..."i .....='.=. ..... . ' 'Commissioner McFall moved, seconded by Commissi6ner Smith', that the: .'i'.~
.
22 ·January 1968) be approved subject .to the 'cond.itions set forth in
~'..:.
.', ~ .] '.~ ... said report; motion carried unanimously. . - '.
"
'~." "~" "' '..' · B. SD-'607 - Douglas. P. Hines, PierCe ROad - Revision of Tentative' Map
..
... :' .'=' ... " Subdivision Approval - 5 Lots -·Continued fr0m'8.January 1968.
·"
..... · Commissioner McFall recommended that this matter be continued to the next"
regular'meetins to await a report ·from the Health Department'..·· ". .'~. "' "
· "'A. A-262,, ,, ·Richfield Station, Cox and Paseo Pr. esada - Final DeSi'~n Review ..~ . .
'Commissioner Smith stated that'a Staff Report"ha~ 'b'e~n"."
.. relative
] to .A-262 and requested the Assistant""Planner to read same. ' ~' ~'
":""
?...". . ...." .. :". ..f... ..' .'.' ..: . '. .~ .. ... . ]." .
. .
""' " ' "' " ' ' " ....... " "' ~ ' "j:"' zi.
· .. . r ..... '. '.. ....l.!' ' , ..
· . ' ' " ' ' " · . · '.. !," . .' .
· ,. ': ~ ." ,
.... ' Planning· Commission Meeting -'22 January 1968 - Continued
'j'l't"' "' "." 'IV. B. j~'-268 - Kirby M.. Casebolt, Big' .Basin Way. Final' Design Review -
: '. '." Identification Sign - Continued from 8 January 1968
""':"" "/'" "' "" "' "' After providing the applicant' with a copy of the Staff Report· the
:: ... · ..' '." 'members of the Commission read the report recommending that A-268
' subject to conditions stated in ·said report ....
".
"' The.applicant expressed 'satsifaction with conditions set forth
"..'.'.....' ': :.Commissioner Smith move'd,.seconded by ·Commissioner McFall, that the " '[
· . ff'..C'.."...'. ." Staff Report of 22 JanQary 1968 be ·adopted and'A-268 be granted Final
.
.... · '., '.. DeSign Approval in accordance with. Exhibits ."A" and "B" subject to the
"""'" ':" . conditions listed 'in said r'eport;. motion Carried .unanimously.'
.".' = z'2 ..
"' "~""' "" 'L' 'C. A-269 Abel M. Carrein, Sarat'oga-SUnnyvale Road - Preliminary Design
..
·-...~..' ..z'. " Conunissioner Smith stated 1) 'this .has been reviewed with the cltent's ...,
. '.
. .' ~' ." =' · ·architect, Mr. Menard and 2)' this iS for preliminary approval only.
The members of the Planning CommissiOn read. to themselves.: 'the Staff.
.'
· .......z~../..Li..' . ~"=' Report' of 22 January 1968'recommexiding that Preliminary Design Review
'.' ~. ':~
. ....~ :.'..: .... " .=..... :......Chairran. NOrtOn .stated that 1) this is not'.a tradeturk' sign .'such as .:
· ":~=' .'~:.7..~- ..,'. = ....'=':. :not authorize stand-up' signs and '3) 'perhaps the' OrdinanCe should be' " :.: .:.' ..... · ' .revie~d ' ;
~ .. ·
. .~ .. ... ... z. ..... :.' ...Comissioner Smith agreed that' the ·sign ordinance needed some revision. '.. · l' .'~' "' "':" j" ' The' SeCretary. in answer to an inquiry· from.
Chairran Norton. 'explained
=7 'After .discussion, Co~issi0ner.'Smith moved 'secOnded .by C~i'ssioner"Crisp,'
· '.."'~: '~/.~"..'. "' that the' Staff Report .of. 22 January 1968 .be adopted .and 'A-272 be granted .'."
'; -.~ f .... Final Design Approval as sho~: .0n Exhibits '.'A" .and "B"' and .subject t0' the
..."', "=:. '..': · 'V.. CI~ 'CO~CIL REPORT .... '. . .. . :: .. ' ..' . .'. ',. ...... .......'
.. .'.:. · '~ · · .'. .'.'. " 2 '. .' '.'.
~ ,. . ' Comissioners '~sner and"McFall'. '. .. ·
.... · .. ". . · . · , "..Zi" . '.;' · ',~ "2....., " .'.. ·. ·.'
...:.~ .... ... ... . . ~ · ~ ..... ~ ...'~ .... ~...... .. .
". ' "" "' ' " ' 2 . ~"' .
!' PlanninF. 'Commission MeetinF~ - 22 JanUary 1968'- Continued
" VI. .OLD BUSINESS
"l~..]' ',7 .~ """ A. C-86 - Neil K. Chase,· Saratoga Avenue - Request for Extension· -
· . .... ...' . .. Continued from 8 January 1968
"!... 7"- "."""" ''':~' '~ Chairman Norton directed each member of 'the Commission to read the
'...,"..'- .... "' Staff .Report·relative to C-86.recommending-that this request be..
'
· ;.. ... given favorable consideration. " .. "'. ..
"..'.: t :' .. CommiSsioner McFall briefly explained that there' is need for a .
"=/? ':"~ ""' .. resolution by the City of what type of ·widening will 'be required
.. · . on Saratoga AvenUe which: would significantly affect this· property. ':'
· ..'.. COmmissioner McFall moved, seconded'by Commissioner Smith,' that the'
· ...-..... ... Staff Report Of 22 January 1968. be. adopted and C-86 be given· favorable
... .' .'%. '{' .~ consideration subject to submittal ~of acceptable plans by the applicant
" .l .... = .". or his representative for development of this property prior to the
...
.' "';'.z......:.. '...' '. ~ present expiration date of 10.'April 1968; motion. carr.ied unanimously..
".. ·
· . Z'..r,.~' ..... " B. Sb~ALL ANIMAL ORDINANCE - P,r_pgress' Report' Of 'the Gener~ Plan 'Committee
...
.. '.f' . '7 ' .
.' ..
' "' .~ ....' Commissioner Johnson requested that' copies of the revised Ordinance
..... :.. ' ' " ' ... be mailed to each member of the .CommisSion · for study prior to the
! ..~-" next regular meeting. ': ' · .
.' ' :" '" ' " ' :'
..z ·
,.. . . .... f. .... ..
"' """ '.' .. 'Chairman Norton recommended that this matter .no~ be Scheduled for ,.
..
: . ·hearing at the next regular meeting ·since the General Plan Revi'ew w-ill .!..
· "l .'.'~l.! "'.. .. .' i. undoubtedly take up a great deal of time at. the next regular' meeting.......~:~z'!.~' '
· ' ,.... j.; · . .....; . ; .~ ... · .
..
'~' .." z" :. ' Commissioner Crisp· inquired if the' .General' Plan Con~nittee'shoUld prepa't~....I
z...'....'..... !.;.',.....~.~'.'.' 'L.7~ ".a. preliminary report relative.· to the General' Plan Review. j]. '."!~[~'i" '..i],...'!. ..l .; !.z..~'
'~"=" !":!."""' "" '.' ..... Chairman Norton,· in answer' to' C0mmiSsioner.'Crisp~s 'inqUirX,
""" =' '. :.'..' .' would be inclined to agree .to " submission of such a report..~
" ' ' i uar ,··'.,Westbrook, 'etc.
· 'i' "..r: .... '.'.... Commissioner Smith emphasized that Stones0n Max] ..:
· :L..'.i..l..i~!:.=.' :"' " should be considered in this.'report~ ""' '.' .i:..'-~. '... .z .' .."" '" .... ' "":
;.. VI ' NEW BUSINg · " = '.'. '... "'~'
· .! :i . i~. · REVISION IN DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURE ' ~.' ..... :
'
· '.'. ' "" ....... 2. "~ · .... ' ' ' "" .. ' · · · '. ' ' ' .......
.".~'.'..L'j' "' ":'" "MrS' B0nfiglio, ·Assistant Planner, stat'e'd. that after 'dareful. study'.wi~h the
· '."s." ".....Z !. ~2. Design Review Committee the ChairmaU of that' Committee, .cOmmissioner O'Rorke 'and
!. :~", .'~'~'j"...':~ 2.." the Planning Director recommended that· Mr."Bonfig!io take.steps .to 'set up a more
· ..:.... formal procedure for, Design Review;' therefore., some changes will..'b.e..forth'.coming.'
.'./' .... .. .. . :.,..i~..... ~ ~ ·
.
· .. · · L".'.;'."..... . . .~. . . . ...'. ' ~...
' '. 'i .. · '. · ...="': "' A; '. WRiTT'EN '.' '. .. · ' ' "' ". "' ' ! ..' '. ' '" ', ~'" '..
·
~.'! '..:".".'j" ".': .. UP-121 - West Valley Baptist ·Church, Fruitvale and Aliendale A~en'ues .-, '.
· · . . 2' '. ...' .' .
'.
"" ="' ~ '" :' "" "'. "' "' .'.'The' Secretary. '1)... rea<] a ':' letter ' s'ubmitted .by the West'. Valley Baptist Church
~ .' ...... .... .. .
. ·
":.""""' :.'."....'~:' = "' .reqUesting'a one .(1) year extenslOn for UP~'121. and 2)~ recommended that· thiS·
:,':=' .';..~.i'.....~ ". ,... matter be referred to 'the SUbdiVision Committee.and continued t'o.' the n'ext'
' ng " ' · ..... ' "" "
.-..'~..'. regular meeti '. :. ''." · ' ' . .' ....
..,....":v.! ' . . . . · 'i .: ". ' ' "'
~.'.:..,..:~........~. · .... . ...........
~""""/'.'.""" '. :. 'Chairmau. Norton s0. direc'~ed~ ." ' """ ' '.'~":" "' "" " .... '
.....:.........'; .. . ;. . .! '.' ... :. .. . '... ..,
... ! . · ..'.: .. :'....... .'.~... ..
.... .... ."'. . ~.. .. '~ '.."L
2' '! , '
~..... .=.'. .. .. ... ... ... : .... . ... . . .
.... .....~ .... ... ~.........'..' ..
. ..L -12" ' : ' · . ' . . ' · · '! .'
· . .. .
. .. .. . .; .. . · .
: .. .' · · 2 '.' .. ' "'" '
~ , · · "'
~ . . .' . .. '.! '.~ :.' .. .:.. ': ..~... . ..... . .
. :. ~.. . . . . · ...... · , ~ . .. . '... · .
"' " " "' ..... "2".' :
"
· · .". · · '. ' ....
.' '... 2 ., ................. .
· .~'... .
..... '. . .': · '2. ., ' .
~"" '.' .~'... .'.i ""' "' """':' ""<""' "' ....
.. .. ... . .. ': .. .....
:.... . ,.. · ... ....! ,.~ .. i '. ·
: Planning Commission Meeting - 22 January 1968 - Continued "
{ ": ":" VIII'.' B.. ,ORAL "' "'
{" "' i' "' ' ' SMALL ANIMAL ORDINANCE. . ... ...'
.'.. ~.'; .'...': . ,... ....:
~ " Chairman Norton', on behalf Of the Planning Commission, expressed
...~ .... .. ' .. appreciation to the General:Plan Committee for producing the Small
:': ' .' . ' ' Animal. Ordinance. ' ;' .' · "
. :.. .. ... ..f.~.., : ~."
"- ..' "' WESTBROOK IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION " ., .: '
{:' ........ '.." Chairman Norton mentioned that a very gracious letter was' re'ciev~d
"i. i'." . ... from the Westbrook Improvement ASsociation thanking the Planning
" " "' ""' Commission for 'its consid~ration .of their'request for .annexation....
; . . .. 4 ...
.' .. +. ..
"' :""' ' GUE~STS · ' "'" ' ; .... ;: ."'
' ':...:..:.:, './=' ..' . . .
.. .:
~ . . .....
. :. :
'. . .. .{. :
l.:' .i~. !?.'. ~! ....: .. Chairman Norton .acknowledged, 'with pleasure ,. the' presence.. o'f'. .. · ...
.... ...... '....." ' ..' Councilman Hartman, Councilman Robbins (earlier. in the evening) and
:.."'.~. ..... .... Mr. Lewis :and Mrs.. Stark of the GoOd. Government GroUp ': '.He', also&.'
....: ..... ~....'. , thanked Mrs...Stark for the .doffee Served at recessj ... '. '=.. ,..,. "': '.." .' ·
IX. ADJOURNMENT ..... · - ... '...
...... The Chairman declared the"meeti~g'.adJourned .at 11:20 P.M. """"='.."..'!::-'!.'~"'!':".. "."
....... ...'.....'.. .......!.'.'.. · .. · . . .... '. ....
..'.=..:,... ~ ....=L ... ...,. ,.... '. , . .:. ... .. . .' ..: , .....i.,:~'7.{:i;~...:...!:.~'; ..
..'..: .....,. ... .. .. ... ....... .., .. .. .~ ...: .,{.: ...~.' ..... .
{ . · ..
. · . {:.:L., :.. +.'Z':.....
.!... - ........ Z .... . .' ....
· '. '. "'" . Respectfully 'submitted, . .'.. ;.'q. i ....~... ~ .
' ' ........ ' ' "'~. '~ '. "' ': ' ' lke ' ' .ar'y"' '; ""ii": :"' """ '
':':' ';' " ....' "" :"~:' '" :' ." ' · S r., 'Secret
. . · aratoga Planning' COmmission ' '-.":i
.. .... :. .. -.. :.: ..: . ...... ... ... . '.'....... ':. ..... · . ..... .. . ..........: '7 ;~.!' :~.:...../.
- ' """" "' . .' ~ : .'! '.i:.i' .'
· ...... LJ .. i'.'.... "'.: .... :.!.!..~. :..
....:.';:. ..'.' :. ...-... · ,..... ': :.. :........... ..... ...~....=::...
· ..:....:.,.= . ........."........: ....' . . :
. . . ... . ..!
-.' .....'... ... -.' '.'=.i:. 'Z:'.
..',.:~'..'.'. . .': ... . · ... .
. . . ... · .1..:..... ·
. ' ...'... , ., =.. :"'-..'...".'=i'.' '.;~...'. "
. -....... .. . . :.. · '." :'.~;.,'.'~
... ...... ....
. ..' '... .....ZZ .L ~'. '..... . .:.. :-~ · .. ... ... ' . ... .. .'.. :.' .. '.'.. '; ·
. ·
.,..~.. .... .. ...... ..' , ..
.- ". .. " " '.""."'.'.~L.
. .'.' .':=.' ... "i. ". ..... .... ." " · . ' ' "" '. ..... . .'.."" .... ':~ "'.'~..". '"
.... . . .. .. .
~ 2.. '... "
.... :.:......... . . . . , :.'..........'..,.'.... ".'.. '.:...... :..:..' '.. ',......~ ..'
· . . ~. .. .. :
.'~
· .'..',, .. :.....'.' ~ ..' ·
.... . ... - .... : ...
"'. "'. '..."'...' . :.'..... "'. "...'. '.....'.' .' .. ':..'.."i'.'~.'..".:.~...:.,'.'.'..'..~':...:.".'
. .. . ..' : ..'....' ... ":..: ..Z. .... :~ ..,'....: .. "'...'... ;.·
"' :"" ""' "' " .... .'..""'."'~".' "i' '
... . ... ....... ~.'........: .: :.!.' .: "..~..
· '.l' ..~ .... . "' ' ..... ' ...... ' "' '
'
. ....... :. . · . .- ' ... .' . '~ · . . '.. . · .. . ........ . ... . . ...
Z.-"...'...'.."' '.':.. . . .. .-. .. . .... . . . '."
· .'... .' .'= .. .."' .'. . L.. "
~i': ~"'. ' : """' ' ' '~' ":'':' "' '''~''''' '':''~ ': ' '
-.. ......i. . · ."..'': "..:':'.'Z::' ":"':" · .5 ,'..
..... ........ Z i .'..
..... ...... . . ~ . . ..
.... .. . . . . . ...
.'.~
· .:..-. ... .. .~.'..... .:.. .,
....:..~:'..'..':.':.i........".:.-:..:..."""'"'". '..""" ~ .'. .. "!:""..'-"'::'.~ ;!"'...":""i'.".""?..:"'."
· . ..:: '........... . ..: . ... .. . ...... . .' .. :..., .L..
.... · ..~ · . . . . . .' . .. .. . ...
· .... ... .. . .. ... . .. .' .. ' ': ."..' . '..' . .' ; . :' . ...
· : .. ~..: '. '..' . ..
:~:....: ..':. :j .'..... . .
. . .. . . ~.... . '.... .....
· . . '="" · -' . ';d '.' .... '.'. '
..~' ::.',!..' ,......,....... ......:.= :: .. !...... ... ....... .... .... ·
...... . .... .,... .. ... .. . .... .'..,..
:. .,, . ... ..' .j · ..
.. . .-.
.... . .:. . . .'.
, · . .:. .:
.............. . ........... . ..... ..;.. ... ............. .. :2....=...--
... .. ..!.. .......!'.. ..;'~
. . ...... ..
. ;,....~ :.: .'{" ...