Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-28-1971 Planning Commission Minutes I~FINU]?ES TIME: Monday, 28 June 1971, 7:30 P.M. PLACE: City Council Chambers, 13777 Fruitvale AvenUe, Saratoga, California 95070 TYPE: Regular Meeting I. ROUTINE ORGANIZATION The meeting was called to order by Chairman Lively at 7:30 P.M. A. ROLl, CALL Present: Con~nissioners Fagan, Kraus, Lively,".Marshall, Martin, Metcalf, and Smith. Absent:. None Bo MINUTES Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Kraus, that the reading of the minutes of the 14 June 1971 meeting be waived and they be approved as distributed with :the following change: page 5. o .under C. C-145o . .paragraph 2. . .line 5. .delete the word "with" and instead insert a semicolon between the words "lots" and "four"; motion carried with Commissioner Metcalf abstaining since he was absent at the 14 June 1971 meeting. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. C-137 - Alfred F. DumaS, Inc., Prospect Road - Request for Change of Zoning from "R-l-10,000" (Single-Family Residential) to "R-i-iO,O00~' "P-C" (Single-Family Residential Planned Comnunity) - Continued from 14 June 1971 Chairman Lively reopened the hearing at 7:36. P.M. "Mr.'Bob McBain, architect, was present to represent the applicant, and stated he would be happy to answer any questions. Mr. Art Grafe, 12121 Saraglen Drive, stated that 1) he did meet with the · Subdivision Connnittee to discuss this matter and he feels.that the matter of the available square ~ootage was resolved and 2) the residents of the area would like to see a reduction in the number o~ ho~ses presently pro- posed for the property in order to provide lots (in the proposed subdivision) that are the same size ~S those now existing in th~ Blue Hills area Commissioner Smith read the Subdivision Co~nittee Report dated 28 June 1971 reco~nending that the subject Change of Zoning be approved. lie then amended the report on page 2. . .condition (c). ° .add "as approved by the Planning Commission." .'~0mmi~S~ner Smith,'in' answer tO an inqu{ry from Chairma~'LiveiY,' stated that a Maintenance District would be formed to maintain 'area '~n' this "P-c" development and if maintenance is not performed bY _~he District, the City will take over and' tax th'~ residents of the "P-C" develop- ment. Chairman Lively read the Subdivision Conm~ittee Report dated 28 June 1971 recommending approval of the tentative map 'for SD-902 filed by the applicant in connection with C-137 and stating that a Park Maintenance District to maintain open-space and con~on green is to be established. -1- Planning Co~r~nission Minutes - 28 June 197]. - Continued II. A. C-137 - Continued Commissioner Metcalf read the Staff Report relative to application A-373 reconm~ending that Final Design Approval be granted for the subject planned community development. Conraissioner Smith explained that only the report relative to C-137 would be approved at this time and that the reports relative to SD-902,'and A-373 would be acted upon as they came UP in the regular order of the agenda. Commissioner Fagan. stated that the .Subdivision Committee, during its deliberations of the pro. posed "P-C" development, did take into consider- ation the fact that the proposed subdivision would provide a buffer zone between the adjacent proposed freeway and the existing Blue Hills residen- tial area. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Kraus, that the hearing relative to C-137 be closed at 8:02 P.'M.;. motion carried unanimously. CoMissioner Smith moved, seconded by Co~issioner Kraus, that the SubdiVision Committee Report dated 28 June 197]. be adopted and the subject change of zoning to "P-C" (Single-Family Residential Planned CoMunity) be reco~ended to the City Council for approval on' the basis the Objectives of Section 4 A.6(d) and 1816 of Ordinance NS-3 can be made subject to the conditions stated in said report; motion carried with Chairman Lively voting~No. B. C=139 - Malachy J. Moran, Saratoga AVenue - Request for Change of Zoning .from "R-i-20,000" (Single-Family Residential) to "R-l-15,000" (Single-Family Residential) - Continued from 14 June 1971 Ch'airman Lively reopened the hearing at 8:04 P.M. The Secretary reco~neded that C-13 be continued since the Staff is in the process of doing a study of transitional areas such as the Moran property and a preliminary report will be submitted at this-meeting under old business. No one in the .audience wished to conMent. The applicant was not present. Chairman Lively closed ~he hearing for the evening at 8:06 P.M., directed the matter continued to the next regular meeting and referred C-139 to the Subdivision Co~mittee. C. C-145 - B. T. Caleb, Ted Avenue -"Request for Change of Zoning from "R-l-10,000"' (Single-Family Residential) to "R-M-5,000" (Multi- Zamily Residential) - Continued from 14 June 1971 Chairman Lively reopened the hearing at 8:06 .P.M. The Secretary advised that the applicant has requested .that this matter be continued in .order to allow time for him to develop further ravised plans and meet again with the homeo~,mers in the area. Mr. Dick Green~ 12350 Goleta Avenue~ that the residents of the area did meet with the applicant and there does seen~ to be some discrepancy in 'the actual number of duplexes that can be placed' on the subject property. He is interested in obtaining information as to when' the actual .number allowed will be established. Chairman Lively answered that the number of units that will eventually be allowed will be detet~ined at the time of the change of zoning approval (if-it' is indeed approved). -2- ...~. Planning Commission M~inutes - 28 June 1971 - Continued II. C. C-145 - Continued Mr. Fred Adolpli., 20255 Sea Gull Way, stated that 1) he wondered if the Planning Co~.m~ission did take ix~to account the situation that exists in the area of the proposed change of zoning. 2) there have been many problems in this area which the applicant has been aske.d to correct such as a general clean-up of the area and paving of the driveway; which, has. never been done 3) he has lived in the area for six and one half (6~) years and has tolerated various and numerous indignities from the applicant and his tenants living in the apartments directly to the rear of his (Mr. Adolph's) property 4) the orchard and commercial district (owned by the applicant) is a mess 5) Mr. Galeb has stated many times that he intends .to upgrade the area in Azule, but he does nothing to accomplish this 6) the applicant allows motorcycle racing, weeds, loose dogs, and a general collection of debris on his property and the request to have him do somethipg abOUt the situation go unacknowledged ,7) the sheriff has been called to talk to 'the applicant on many occasionS, but the warnings go unheeded.'~d' 8) urges. the Planning Conmission to require the applicant to clean-up the area before he allowed to proceed with any further construction of develop- men t. Chairman Lively closed the hearing for' the' evening'at 8:14 P.M., directed the matter continued to the next regular meeting and referred C-145 to the Subdivision Committee. D. C-146 - Aubrey johnston, Quito Road - Request for change of zoning from "R-l-10,000" (Single-Family Residential) to "C-N" (Neighborhood- Co~mnercial) - Continued from 14 June 1971 The hearing relative to C-146 was reopened at 8:15 P.M. The applicant was present and stated that 1) he has lived on this property for twenty (20) years and the State Highway Department told him at that time (twenty (20) years ago) that they were going to buy the property and he is still waiting and 2) he has declared hardship and the State Highway has bought property all around him and he cannot understand why they do not buy his since he does want to retire. The Secretary read the Staff Report dated '28 June 1971 recommending that the subject change of zoning in connection with C-146 be denied. Commissioner Kraus moved, seconded by Comnissioner Smith, to close the 'he~ring relative to C-146 at 8:22 P.M.; motion carried unanimously. Co~m~issioner Smith moved, seconded by Conunissioner Kraus, to adopt the Staff Report dated 28 June 1971 relative to C-146 and reconmend to the City Council that the subject application for Change of Zoning be denied on the basis the objectives of Z~ning Ordinance NS-3, Section 1.1 cannot · be achieved for the reasons stated in said report; motion carried unanimously. E. C-148 - George W. Day, Fruitvale Avenue and Douglas Avenue - Request for Change of Zoning from '~A" (Agricultural) to "R-I-40,000" (Single- Family Residential) - Continued from 14 June 1971 Chairman Lively reopened the hearing at 8:23 P.M. Mr. Victor A. Chargin, attorney representing the.Ljepava family, stated that 1) his client is opposed to the subject change of zoning since it would establish a precedent that would adversely affect the Ljepava property located in the area and 2) the Ljepava family has other plans for the development of the property. CoEissioner Fagan asked if Mr. Chargin was saying that the proposed change' of zoning would be inconsistent or may be inconsistent with what the Ljepava family wants to do with their property~ Mr. Chargin stated that the proposed change of zoning would be inconsistent with what his client .'intends for his property~ -3'- Planning Con'~nission Minutes - 28 June 1971 - Continued II. E. C-].48 - Continued .. Cormnissioner Metcalf explained that in the general area .of the subject property all the land is shown as very low density on the General Plan Map. Mro Chargin stated he was under the impression the area was to be used as a Central Park' site. The Secretary explained that the porti.on fronting on Fruitvale is designated for park use. Dolly Gay, 234 Marshall Street, Redwood City, a realtor representing the Liepave and Novakavich families, stated that 1) her clients are long time taxpayers in the City of Saratoga 2) 'it was the unders.tanding of her clients that the applicant was going to request "R-i-20,000" zoning for the subject property 3) "R-I-40,000" zoning is not financially reason- able for the said property since it is located in the middle of the civic center and adjacent to the West Valley Junior College 4) with interest rates what they are a home on an "R-i-40,000" lot in this area would cost 'in the neighborhood of $100,000.5) anyone who can afford a home in that price range will not want to buy in the middle of a civic center complex and 6) it is the hope of her client that the applicant will reconsider his request for "R-i-40,000" zoning and instead consider a request for "R-I-20,000" zoning for. the subject property. Chairman Lively explained that the said .property is one of two locations proposed for a Central Park site. The second site. is located at the corner of Saratoga Avenue and Fruitvale Avenue; however, 'the City has not decided which site they will use for the park. Mr.' Edward Panelli, attorney for the applicant, stated that he finds himself in agreement with the opposition; however, the "R-i-20,000" zoning suggested by Mrs. Gay would be inconsistent with the General Plano Chairman Lively closed the hearing for the evening at 8:37 P.M., directed the matter continued to the next regular meeting and referred C-148 to the SubdivisiOn'Committee for further study. III~ BUILDING SITES AND SUBDIVISIONS A; SD-902 - A1 Dumas, Prospect Road - SubdiVision Approval - 19 Lots - Continued from 1~ June 1971 Mr. Charles J. Schneider, engineer for the applicant, was present and stated he had reviewed the proposed conditions of approval and expressed satisfaction With same. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Con~nissioner Kraus, that the Subdivision Co~rnnittee Report dated 28 June 1971 relative to SD'-902 be. adopted and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A-2", filed 14 june 1971) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried with Chairman Lively voting "no". Chairman Lively explained that he voted "no" because he is not in agreement with the number of lots proposed for the subject subdivision. B. SD-904 - George W. Day, Fruftvale Avenue and Douglas Avenue - Subdivision Approval - 15 Lots.- Continued from 14 June 1971 Con~nissioner Smith stated that because of the continuance of C-148 under public hearings it is recommended that SD-904 be continued to the ne~:t meeting on 12 July 1971. Chairman Lively so directed. -4- Plannin~ Commission Mi~utes - 28 June ].97]_ - Continued IIIo C. SDR-907 - Donald Comer, Pierce Road - Building Site Approval - 4 Lots - Continued from 14 June 1971 Com~nissioner Smith recoxmncnded that SDR-907 be continued to allow time for further study of the m~tter. 7Chairman Lively so directed. D. SDR-909 - Manuel Costa, Quito Road - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot - Continued from 14 June ].971 The Secretary read a communication received from the applicant requesting that SDR-909 be withdrawn. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Kraus, that the request for withdrawal in connection with SDR-909 be approved and all .... p~oceedings' ~elative to same be terminated; motion carried unanimously~ E. SDR-910 - Terry J. Box.~an~ Pierce Road - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot Commissioner Smith recommended that SDR-910 be continued to the next regular meeting. Chairman Lively so directed. F. SDR-911 - Willard Thompson, Oak Street and St. Charles Street - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot C0~issioner Smith explained that thi~ request for building site approval was previously approved and then it expired and the applicant is now re- applying ~ ·Co~issioner Metcalf stated that 1) before any action is taken relative · to SDR-911 he would .like to inquire what has been done about the traffic study for St~ Charles Street and the village area that was proposed as a result of the 1971 General Plan Review and 2) the reco~endation was that there be no further development on St~ Charles Street pending comple- tion of the subject traffic study. The Secretary explained that the City Council has not authorized the Staff nor anybody else to do such a study. Chairman Lively read the recommendation of the Planning Commission con- tained in the General Plan Committee Report as follows: St. Charles Street "~his" Street i~' very' ~rrow, 'a~d"an'= int~'~i-al p'art" Of'the overall yi!.~ge..circulation and parking problem. Because of this, we Eeco~end that no further '~RiM"" developmen't b~' per~itte'd,' pendi~'g the' results o~._.t~.~ professional study recox~nended elsewhere.'.' 'Chai~an Lively then stated that he felt this ~equest for building Site approval should be held in abeyance until the traffic study in connection with St. Charles Street is resolved and the City Council takes some action on the reco~a~endation made by the Planning Commission in the General Plan Report of 12 April 1971~ Co~issioner Metcalf read the following portion of the General Plan Committee Report of 12 April 1971; which, was forwarded to the City Council by the Planning Con~ission: "We reco~unend a professional stndy be undertaken to determine the feasibility of peripheral parking districts combined with no parking on Big Basin Way. This tudy should, also, include 6th Street, St. Charles, and Oak Street as possible methods of easing the traffic problem in the Village area." -5- Planning Conm~ission Minutes ~ 28 June 1.971 - Continued III. F. SDR-911 - Continued The Secretary explained that according to State Law some action must be taken realtive to SDR-911 prior to 5 August 1971 since that is when. the fifty (50) day limitation on the map expires. Chairman Lively directed SDR-911 continued to the meeting of 26 July 1971 and referred same to the Subdivision Co~ittee~ He encouraged each individual Commissioner to make an effort to go look at the property prior to the next meeting. G. SDR-912 - Russell Reed, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot Cbmissioner Smith recommended that SDR-912 be continued to the meeting of 12 July 1971. Chairman Lively so directed. H. SDR-913 - Clayton F. Thomas, Allendale Avenue - Building'Site Approval - 1 Lot The Secretary explained that this matter should not have been included on this agenda since the maps were submitted too late for proper distribution to the necessary agencies. RECESS AND RECONVENE IV. DESIGN REVIEW A. A-325 - United Presbyterian Church, Herriman Avenue and Highway 85 - Final' Design Review - Revised Parking Lot Layout Co~issioner Metcalf read the Staff Report dated 28 June 1971 recommending that Final. Design Approval be granted for the revised. parking-lot layout for the United Presbyterian Church. Comissioner Smith asked how many seats were ihcluded in the original sanctuary since two (2) parking spaces are required for every five (5) seats ~ The Secretary advised that there are three hundred and fifty (350) seats · (approximately) in the original sanctuary. Comissioner Smith explained that with three hundred and fifty (350) seat one hundred and forty (140) parking places are required. The Secretary explained that the representatives for the church have explained that the parking spaces now provided are never all in use at the same time. Commissioner Kraus stated that the reason the parking lot is never filled is because the members' of the. church park in the street and he wondered if some provision to eliminate street parking should be included {n' the Staff Report relative to A-325. Con~issioner Marshall explained that 1) the Church Board was prepared to provide the required parking and 2) the suggestion to reduce the required number of parking spaces by six (6) and instead provide more landscaping rather than more concrete was submitted by the Church Youth Group. Comissioner Metcalf 'explained that the gist of the entire matter is that by allowing the revised parking-layout~ six (6) parking spaces will be sacrificed and a green-area will be gained. 'Commissioner Kraus stated, he felt, the plan had merit but he would like to see the church members 'park off the street~ -6- .. Plannin~ Commission Minutes; - 28 June ].97]. - Continued IV. A. A-325 - Continued The Assistant Planner stated that a recon~nendation can be submitted to the City Council to have the curb area in the street (now used for parking) painted red; thereby, restricting parking in the street. Cormnissioner Marshall explained that 1) the church has a unique situation in that they have a high-school parking 10t right across the street that can be used on Sundays and 2) it seems reasonable to s~stitute a green~area instead of more asphalt. The Secretary explained that the number of act~l seats in the church is open to interpretation because it is questionable how many persons :can actually be seated in a pew. The Assistant Planner explained that the applicant has had a bond posted for about six (6) years for the required parking and now the church would like to go ahead with the parking plan;-.however, they wish to modify the original plan. Chairman Lively stated that the applicant would be granted an automatic variance by changing the number of required parking spaces from one hundred thirty nine (139) to one hundred thirty three (133). Con~missioner Smith stated that the only place in the ordinance where an automatic variance is allowed is in a "P-C" (Planned Cosmunity Develop- ment); however, the applicant could make a formal request for a variance to allow only one hundred thirty three (133) parking spaces in lieu of the required one hundred thirty nine (139). Chairman Lively requested the Secretary to check the original plans submitted by the church to determine the actual seating~apacity and exactly how many parking spaces are required in accordance with that plan. Co~isSioner Martin stated that the revised plan could be approved if a condition were added to the Staff Report stating that additional parking could be provided in the future. Connnissioner Kraus stated that the Variance Con~ittee could meet with the applicant on Saturday morning, 3 July 1971 if the applicant should decide to apply for a variance in connection with the subject parking spaces. Chai~an Lively directed A-325 continued to the next regular meeting in order to allow time to determine the seating-capacity of the church and referred the matter to the Design Review Co~nittee. The matter was, also, referred to the Variance Committee,. if it is decided a variance is necessary. B. A-360 - Grace United Methodist Church, Prospect Road - Final Design Review - Fellowship Hall Commissioner Metcalf read the Staff Report dated 28 June 1971 reco~ending that Final Design Approval be granted for the fellowst~p hall for the Grace United Methodist Church. Commissioner Me[calf explained that 1) the only landscaping that will be done is in the actual construction area and 2) the proposed traffic-plan was submitted to the Public Works Department and approved by them. Commissioner Metcalf recommended that the subject Staff Report be amended as follows: paragraph 2. . ~labt line~ ~ .change "Exhibit "B""~ . .to read ~Exhibit "F""; aragraph 3 line 3. change "Exhibits "B" through "E"" to read "Exhibits ~B" through"'~~''~' "' -7- J Planning Commission Minutes - 28 June ].971 - Continued IV. B. A-360 - Continued condition a) . . .line 2. . .change "Exhibit "B""o .to read "Exhibit "A""; add condition d) as follows: d.) Change ~ltimate traffic-flow islands and parking space layout in accordance with revised overlay. ~ (Exhibit "F") Cormmissioner· Metcalf moved, seconded by Co~mnissioner Marshall, that the Staff Report dated 28 June 1971 be adopted, as amended, and that Final Design Approval be granted for the fellOwship- hal l as shov~ on Exhibits "B" through "F" in file A-360 and subject to the conditions stated in said report; motion carried with Commissioner Martin abstai. ning.· C. A-373 - A1 F. Dumas, Inc., Prospect Road - Preliminary Design Review - Planned Community Development - Continued from 14 June 1971 Cormmissioner Metcalf explained that the Staff Report dated 28 June 1971 had been read earlier in the meeting at the time C-137 (Alfred F. Dumas) was considered. The said report recommends th.,~t Final Design Approval be granted for the subject planned co~.mnunity development. Cormnissioner Metcalf moved, 'seconded by Con~nissioner Martin, that the Staff Report dated 28 June 1971 be adopted and that Final Design~ Approval be granted for the planned conm~unity development as. sho~m on Exhibits "B" and "C" in file A-373 and subject to the conditions stated in said report; motion carried with Chairman Lively voting "no". D. SS~68 - Highland Development Company, Prospect Road - Final Design Review - Temporary Subdivision Sign· Commissioner Metcalf read the Staff Report dated 28 June 1971 recormnending that Final Design ApproVal be granted for SS-68. He then reconm~ended that condition (b) of the subject report be amended to read as follows: (b) "Sign not to exceed eight (8) feet in overall height with one (1) foot pilings. Commissioner Metcalf moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the Staff Report dated ·28 June 1971 be adopted, as amended, and that Final Design Approval be granted for the temporary· subdivision sign as sb. own on Exhibits "A" and "B" and subject to the conditions stated in said report; motion car·ried unanimously. 'V. CITY CODr'NCIL REPORT Commissioner Smith gave a sunmary of items reviewed and action taken at the C~ty Council· meeting of 16 June 1971, with emphasis on ite'ms of particular interest 'to tha Commission. VI.· PLANNING-POLICY CO~fMITTEE REPORT CommiSs_ione~. Kraus stated that 1) he attended the 24 June 1971 PPC meeting 2) an ...... Airpo~-'t Land Use Commission will be appointed - the first meeting to'. be ... held 12 August 1971 3) the Con~nission will look into ·the' whole airport situation in the ·Santa Clara Valley 4) the proposed revised budget for 'ALU. C was approved 5)z·.·iT·.·Councilman Jerry Smith presented the report of the Santa Cruz Mountain Study and 6) Councilman Smith is now Chairman of PPC and Lee Lynch is Vice-Chairman. VII. OLD BUSIN'ESS A. Malachy ·J. Moran,· Saratoga Avenue·- Request for General Plan Adjustment - Continued from 14 June 1971 CormniSsioner Metcalf explained that the Genera]. Plan Conunit. tee must postpone their recormraendation o~i the subject request until such time as the Staff has completed a study on all border-line zoning-areas as requested at the Joint· Council and Planning Conm~ission meeting of 27 May 1971. -8- Plannin~ Commission Minutes -' 28 June ].971 - Continued VII. A. Moran - Continued The Secretary e>~plained that the Staff has raady a lengthy preliminary report and maps in connection with these border areas; which, report includes a three (3) page sunm~ary of the Moran property. The Secretary .stated that since the report is rather lengthy and complex the matter could be continued to allow time for review of same. Chairman Lively referred the matter to the General Plan Cormnittee and requested that they prepare a recon~nendation to the City Council relative to the Moran request. Commissioner Metcalf, Chairman of the General Plan Committee, arranged with the General Plan Coxmnittee to meet on Saturday, 3 July 1971, at 9:30 A.M. to discuss the subject request. B. SDR-895 S.B. Walton, Saratoga Hills Road - Request for Reconsideration of Building Site.Approval Condition - Continued from 14 June 1971 The Secretary stated that the applicant did meet with the Subdivision Cormnittee and requests that the matter.be continued to allow him additional time to gather further information. Ct~airman Lively directed the matter continued to-the next regular meeting. Co Aesthetic' Grading Standards The Secretary stated that 1) the aesthetic grading standards were created (along with the slope density formula),to protect the hillsides 2) a copy of the standards have been placed in each Commissioner's individual folder 3) many of the figures in the standards are require- ments of the Fire Department and 4) the Staff Report dated 28 June 1971 reconrnends that the Planning Com~nission approve the standards and incorporate them into Section 10o3 of Subdivision Ordinance NS-5. Commissioner Kraus stated that he would like additional time to review the subject aesthetic standards. Chairman Lively suggested that the Commissioners study their copies of the aesthetic grading standards and directed the matter continued to the meeting of 12 July 1971 and referred the matter to the Subdivision Committee. D. Sanitary Sewer Policy Commissioner Smith read the Subdivision Committee Report dated 28 June 1971 stating that the Cormnittee. concurs with the Staff Report of 14 j't:ne 1971 relative to a policy requiring sanitary sewers fo~' new s'dbdivi'sions of five (5) lots or more. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Kraus, to adopt the Subdivision Cormnittee Report dated 28 June 1971 and the Staff Report dated 14 June 1971 relative to a policy requiring sanitary sewers for new subdivisions of five (5) or more lots and forward same to the City COuncil for its consideration; motion carried unanimously. VIII. NEW BUSINESS Balkan Festival - Villa Montalvo The Assistant Planner stated that a request has 5~een received for permission to place a large banner between the two (2) stone posts which mark the original entrance to Montalvo on ~'.fontalvo Road to advertise a Balkan Festival on 30, and 31 July and 1 August.1971. -9- Planning Commission Minutes - 28 June 1971 - Continued VIII. Balkan' Festival - Continued Commissioner Metcalf stated he would abstain from any discussion relative to this matter since his wife is Co-Chairman of the Festival and he is on the Board of Trustees for Montalvo. Chairman Lively, after a brief discussion, referred the matter to the Staff for their administration. IX. COM~RRqlCATIONS A. WRITTEN : None B. OK~L AZule Area -Gaieb Properties Chairman Lively stated that 1) he did promise Mr. Adolph earlier in the meeting (under discussion of C-145, B. T. Galeb) that the Planning Co~mnission would give some consideration to requiring Mr. Caleb to clean up his properties in the Azule area and 2) the Code Enforcement Officer could take a. look at the properties and if he finds any violations=, o'f the Zoning Ordinance or sanitation standards he could submit a written report to the Planning Commission for review at the meeting of 12 July 1971 'or as soon as possible. The Secretary explained that the Planning Commission could state. they will proceed no further with the Change of Zoning until the area is cleared of all debris. Chairman Lively encouraged each Commissioner to make an on-site inspection of the area and bring their cormn~ents to the next regular meeting. He, also, referred the matter to the Code Enforcement Officer for review.. and a written report. Guests Chairman Lively. acknowledged, With pleasure~ the presence of Mrs. Belanger and Mr~ HUbback of the Good Government Group. He, also, thanked Mrs. Belanger for the coffee she served at recess. ""':~ X. ADJOUR~IENT Chairman Lively.adjourned the meeting at 10:45 PoM. Respectfully submitted, ..~.. ~tanley'M~./Qalker, secretary .saratoga Planning Cormnission -10-