HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-23-1971 Planning Commission Minutes (2) CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
TIME: Monday, 23 August 1971, 7:30 P.M.'
PLACE: City Council Chambers, 13777 FruitVale Avenue, Saratoga, California 95070
TYPE: Regular Meeting
I. ROUTINE ORGANIZATION
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Lively at 7:30 P.M.
A. ROLL CALL
Present:Commissioners Fagan, Kraus, Lively, Marshall, Martin, Metcalf,
and Smith.
B. MINUTES
Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Kraus, that the
reading of the minutes of the 9 August 1971 meeting be waived and
they be approved as distributed; ~otion carried unanimously.
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Cr.~48 - George W. Day, Fruitvale Avenue and Douglas Avenue - Request for
Change of Zoning from '~".(Agricultural) to '~-1-40,000" (Single-
Family Residential) - Continued from 9 August 1971
The hearing relative to C-148 was.reopened at 7:32 P.M. The Secretary
explained that the applicant has submitted a request to amend his appli-
cation to ask for '~-1-40,000" '~C" (Single-Family Residential Planned-
Community) instead of '~-l-40,000'r (Single-Family Residential). The
Secretary further stated that 1) .!the Staff has prepared several different
plans for development of this central area and have available some of the
best ones for consideration by ~he Planning Commission 2) these plans
reflect what the Staff Considers to be the best approach to development
of this property combined with Mr. Beck's (Park Consultant) suggestions
and the applicant's ideas 3) proposal '~" is a '~-C" concept with one-half-
acre building--sites surrounded by.common gree 4) another proposal with
more emphasis on a central park iS, also, available and 5) also, available
is a plan with elaborate street patterns which shows more chopped-up
common~green area with more cul-de-sac lots.
Commissioner Kraus commented that ·proposal '~" shows '~-C" building sites
insulated from surrounding residences by a common-green~
The Secretary explained·that the applicant has, also, submitted a proposal
which has no bordering green area .around one building site.
Co~,~nissioner Smith stated that the Planning Con~nission should decide~: wh'~ch
of the plans are suitable and then initiate a '~-C" zoning substantially in
accordance with the map that is adopted.
Commissioner Metcalf stated that some consideration should be given as to
the type of fencing to be allowed ~in this area especially along Fruitvale
Avenue and Douglas Avenue.
Ch~-~rman LiVe.ly Stated that-this. development will b~ subject tb.D~Sign Re~iex~
-Appro~~fenc!ing~can_..be conside.rea_at--that-t~me. "-' .''! ...... --" .....'~ ':...:-"' ~'~'..'
: "'. '." "' ".- -:, '." .' .= "'· ' """ ......."':'
Co~sSioner Martin 'agT'~d" that ~t""~'§ ':imp~eible" to' disc~e: the :: fen~g '~d;
further stated that he is not in favor of [~lv~n~ fence~ all along Fruitvale
k~'~e.; bU~ ~f. ~' inakvi'aual'.wan~' ~0~'. fence-his~yard he':'sh~Uld ~a~e]~h~"u~igh~
· to that.' - ' '-. · "..'- · . .- '~." . "~ .." ...'~ 7." ...-:...- . ......' ': .] '~.. '~ .....
-1-~
p..lanning commission Minutes - 23 August 1971 - Continued
II. A. C-148 - Continued :
The Secretary,'in answer to an inquiry from Conmissioner Kraus, stated
that additional plans for this'area are displayed for review in the
Crisp Memorial Conference Room.
Chairman Lively requested the SeCretary to publish a Notice of Hearing
to all residents within 500-feet~of this property as soon as one (1)
or two (2) plans are presented that are worthy of serious consideration.
He then closed the hearing for the evening at 7:51P.M,, directed C-148
continued to the next regular meeting, and referred same to the Subdivision
Connnittee.
III. BUILDING SITES AND SUBDIVISIONS
A. SD-904 - George W. Day, Fruitvale Avenue and Douglas Avenue -'Subdivision
~pproval - 15 Lots - CoB~inu~ from 9 August 1971
Chairman Lively diredted SD-904 Continued to the next regular meeting
since its outcome is pending on action for C-148.
B. SDR-918 - Monty R. Boyd, Arroyo ~e Arguello - Building Site Approval -
1 Lot
Commissioner Smith recommended t~at SDR-918 be continued'~o the next regular
meeting _since there are problems with F~ood Control '~hat have to be resolved.
Chairman Lively so directed.
C. SD-919 - Kosich Construction Co.,' Ted Avenue - Building Site Approval -
5 Lots
Commissioner Smith stated that SD-919 has been discussed in a preliminary
way with the Kosich Brothers and.~the matter should be coneinued to the next
regular meeting to allow time for. further consideration.
Chairman Lively so directed.
D. SDR-920 - Roman T. Chavez~ Bel.nap Court - Buildin~ Site Approval - 1 Lot
The Secretary explained that there are problems with grading and Fire
Department requirements in connection with this building site.
Commissioner Smith recommended that SDR-920 be continued to the next
regular meeting. .
Chairman Lively so directed.
IV~ DESIGN REVIEW
A; A-381 - St. Andrews Church, Saratoga Avenue - Prelimanry Design Review -
Multi-Use Parish Hall
Commissioner Metcalf stated that the Staff Report relative to A-381 dated
23 August 1971 recommends that Preliminary Design Approval be granted for
the Multi-Use Parish Hall as requested.
Mr. Warren Heid, architect present to represent the applicant, stated that
the parking as shown on Exhibit '~" is in conformance with the City of
Saratoga Parking requirements,originally imposed upon the church and still
in force.
Commissioner Metcalf moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the
Staff Report dated 23 August 1971Zbe adopted and that Preliminary Design
Ap royal be granted for the Multi-Use Parish Hall as shown on Exhibit "A"
anM the conditions staeed in said report~ motion carried unanimously.
subject to
-2~
Planning Connnission Minutes - 23 Au~.ust 1971 - Continued
V~, CITY COUNCIL REPORT
Commissioner Marshall gave a summary of items reviewed and action taken at the
City CounCil meeting of 18 August 197~, with emphasis on items of particular
interest to the Connnission.
VI. OLD BUSINESS
A. C-140 - Prince of Peace Lutheran Church; Saratoga Avenue and Cox Avenue -
Request to Reopen Public Hearink
The Secretary stated that the Reverend Anderson of the Prince of Peace
Lutheran Church has requested that the public hearing relative to C-140
be.reinstated and the hearing be ~enoticed so they might justify their
application and they are doing this in light of tentative results of
General Plan Review by the City Ceuncil which indicates that the City
might go along with designation of '~-A" for this property since a
possible park site does not look ~oo promising.
Chairman Lively stated that no de~ermina!tion should be made until the
City Council takes final action on the General Plan.
Con~nissioner Smith stated that at the time the applicant met with the
Subdivision Committee he was told !to wait until after the City Council
~onsidered the use of this proper~y for a park and now the City council
is negative to the park idea; therefore, the applicant is within his rights
in asking that the hearing be reopened.
Chairman Lively directed the matter continued until after the City Council
finishes their review for the 1971 General Plan.
B. SDR-.911 - Willard Thompson, Oak Street and St. Charles Street - Change in
Motion Made at Moetin~ Of 9 August 1971
Chairman Lively stated that'~ moti.on ~houId made to rescind
the motion made by Commissioner Marshall at the meeting of 9' August 1971
relative to SDR-911 in order to clarify what was intended.
Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Metcalf, that the
motion (made and passed at the meeting of~9 August 1971 and recorded in the
minutes of that meeting relative to SDR-911) be rescinded; motionccarried
with Commissioner Fagan abstaining.
Chairman Lively stated that a new motion should be made in connection with
SDR-911.
C~mnissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commission Smith, to deny the
Building Site Committee Report daeed 23 August 1971 relative to SDR-911
unless a letter of extension is received from the applicant; motion carried
with Commissioner Fagan abstaining'.
VII. NEW2BUSINESS
A. UP-191 - Brown and Kauffmann~ BrOckton Lane - Request for Extension
The Secretar~ read a letter received from the applicant requesting an
extension on UP-191 for the model~ome sales-office on Lot 46 in Tract 4573.
The Secretary recommended that th~ matter be continued to the next regular
meeting..
Chairman Lively so directed.
-3-.
Planning Commission Minutes - 23 August 1971 - Continued
VII, A, UP-191 - Continued
Commissioner Martin stated that 1) this applicant was required to
.provide and re-mark the pa~_n_gi~ the model home. sales office
2) Lthe parking area has not been kept up very w611 and,,'.3) he would
suggest that the applicant be required to dress the parking up just
a little.
B. General Plan Review
Chairman Lively read a memo from the City Manager dated 6 August 1971
relative to clarifying the City~s position in 'regard to the bonus suggested
from some cases of Planned CommUnity Developments.
The Secretary explained that this matter is scheduled for review by
the Planning-Environmental Committee on Wednesday, 25 August 1971,
Commissioner Metcalf advised that the General Plan Connnittee is willin~
to meet with the Plannin~-Envirqnmental Committee to review this matter
at any time.
C. Proposed Ordinance NS-3.29 Re Elimination of Certain Conditional Uses in
'~-1" Zoning Districts
The Secretary stated a memo from the Planning and:Environmental Committee
re elimination of certain conditional uses in '~-l" zoning districts
is in each Commissioner~s folde~ for information purposes.
Chairman Lively explained that i) the Planning Commission was requested
by the City Council to study this matter and make a .recommendation which
the Commission has done 2) there was no comment made relative to this
matter in the General Plan for 1971 and perhaps the-1972 General Plan
should include some wording relative to the elimination of!
certain conditional uses in the '~-1" zoning districts and 3)the Council
Committee feels that a new zoning district should be established in which a
select few specialized uses now;normally allowed as conditional uses in
'~-1" and other zoning districts would be permitted.
The Secretary explained that the type of uses considered for elimination
are becoming more and more independent of '~-1" uses.
Chairman Lively stated that in the past every.ti~eza Use .Permit"has been '
]requested for- one....of~ these use's .~.~e'~'~'i'gHb'b'~'~'~'te~.e~~i~=~
.one has' been approved· recently ,.i_.= .= .-"...;=. '-i ~: ."-."'~ ':-=: -..' "' ""=. :'=::": '~".':h{:'V!'=i~="C~' i:/:':::"
Mr. Sanford Berliner, attorney representing Mr. and Mrs. Noorudin Billawala
i{property owners on Sousa Lane)!stated that 1) his clients are opposed to the
deletion of convalescent hospitals from the '~-1" zoning districts 2) if the
City Council had adopted the recommendation of the Planning Con~nission rela-
tive to this matter and deleted;these uses from the '~-1" zone they would have
established a procedure wherebyZhis client would have to-apply for a Change
of Zoning for his property and then apply for a conditional Use Permit in order
to make use of his property theiway he intends 3) if the proposed amendment
is adopted it would affect the flexibility that the Planning Commission now
has and non-conforming uses would be created 4) the City should establish an
independent zone to allow theseZuses 5) the applicant's parcel on Sousa Lane
should be included in the new "Institutional Zone" according to the City
CounCil request to the PlanningCommission for inclusion in the 1971 General
Plan 6) due to the configuration of the proposed freeway in the Sousa Lane-
Quito Road area and existing convalescent homes the only logical use for
the subject property would be "Instituational Use".
-4-
Plannin~ Commission Minutes - 23 August 1971 - Continued
VII. C. .[.roposed Ordinance NS-3.29 - Continued
Chairman Lively advised that th& subject property on Sousa Lane
has been zoned '~-1" and he didinot feel Mr. Berliner was correct
in saying that the best use of the property in that area would be
"Institutional Use" and the 1971 General Plan does not recommend
any change in the ~-1" areas on Sousa~.Lane.
Commissioner Marshall stated that the City Council did not recommend.
a change in the 1971 General Plan as stated by Mr. Betliner.
Mr. Betliner stated that 1) obviously he and CoumnissionerMarshall
have different ideas as to what!transpired relative to this matter at
the City Council meeting of 18 August 1971 2) his client is anxious
to obtain some type of determination from the Planning Commission
relative to this matter 3) his'client was advised to submit an appli-
cation for a conditional Use Pelfnit and he did that and met with the
appropriate Committee and was then advised that the freeway location
was questionable and no recommendation codld be made until that situation
was resolved 4) a map of the freeway is now available and has been
discussed with Councilman Smith:and the Planning and Environmental
Committee and 5) the applicant:now requests that a report with a
recommendation to the City CounCil be prepared relative to this matter
at the earliest possible date.
Commissioner Marshallstated tha~ Item (3) of the Planning and Environmental
Committee to the City Council dated 18 August 1971 recommends as follows:
"3) Revise the General Plan, subsequent to and independent
of the 1971 General Plan Review, to reflect a land use
designation in appropriate locations established under
good Planning principles for possible zoning to "Institutional"."
Chairman Lively referred the,proposed ordinance to the Subdivision Committee
for further study and a report.
D. Small Pet Ordinance
Chairman Lively requested that the Planning Department Staff study the
Small Pet Ordinance relative toianimals with raucous 'Qutcries to determine
if it could be modified since it has occurred to.him that, perhaps, that
section of the ordinance is too~stringent especially where it relates to
acre lots. ;
E. C6nstruction of Home on Three Oaks Way
Commissioner Marshall stated that 1) the lot across the street from his
house has been sold and he has been.watching the building progress 2) the
foundation was the hastiest job.ever put together in that it was poured
and left for only twenty four (24) hours before starting construction on
the house 3) the builders have.back-filled and graded and formed an
unsightly cliff 4) it concerns,him that perhaps the Building Code is too
loose 5) he requests that each Commissioner take a'look at this site and
6) it appears that the house was designed without plan or little regard
for actual placement of the house on the lot.
The Secretary stated that Don Harris, Chief Building Inspector, would submit
a report relative to this site..'
VIII. COMMUNICATIONS
A. WRITTEN
None
-5-
Plannin~ Commission Minutes - 23 August 1971 - Continued
VIII. B. ORAL
Guests
Chairman Lively noted, with regret, the absence of a Councilman
at this meeting and then acknowledged, with pleasure, the presence of
Mrs. Ruth Owen and Mr~ Ell.is Howard of the Good Government Group~
~]'~ He, also, thanked Mrs. Owen for the coffee to be served after the recess.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Lively adjourned the meeting at 8:50 P.M.
Reapectfully submitted,
Stanley M//Walker,' Secretary
Saratoga· Planning Cornmiss ion
CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COmmISSION
AGENDA
TIME: Monday, 23 August 1971 - 7:30 P.N.
PLACE: City Council Chambers, 13777 FruitVale Avenue, Saratoga, California 95070
TYPE: Regular Heating
I~ RO.UTINE ORGARI. ZATION
A. ROLL CALL
B. PiI/~UTE S
lI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Q~A. C..-.1.~8 - George W. Days Fruitvale Avenue and Douglas Avenue - Request for
Family Residential) - C nt
. . s 17 '
III. BUTLnING SITES AND SUBDIVISIONS
~ A. SD-904 - George W. Day, Fruitvale Avenue and Douglas Avenue - SubdivisiOn .'
Approval - 15 Lots - Continued from 9 Augus.t.. 1971
~ B. SDR-918 - Monty R. Boyd, Arroyo do Arguello - Building Site Approval -
1 Lot
C C. SD-919 - Xosich Construction Co., Ted Avenue
5 Lots
CD. SDR-920 - Roman T. Chavez,. Belnap. Court...-....Bu. ilding Site .Approva.1 - 1,L0~
IV. DESIGN REVIEW
~A. A-381 - St. Andrews Church. Saratoga Avenue - Preliminary Design Review! -
v. city co cE .ORT
VI. OLD BUSINESS
A. C-140 - Prince of Peace Lutheran Church, Saratoga Avenue and Cox Avenue~ - Request to Reopen Public. Hearing. ,
VII. NEW BUSINESS
~VIII. COMMUNICATIONS
A. WRITTEN
B. ORAL
IX....ADJOU.RbI~NT '
J