Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-26-1973 Planning Commission Minutes CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY OE MINUTES ******************** TIME: Monday, February 26, 1973 - 7:30 P.M. PLACE: Saratoga City Council Chambers, 13177 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California TYPE: Regular Meeting **********~********* I. ROUTINE ORGANIZATION A. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Belanger, Lively, Marshall, Matt~oDil',.o-~and~'Smith. Absent: Commissioners Martin (for the first half of the meeting only) and Metcalf. : B. MINUTES : Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, ~hat the reading of the minutes of February 13, 1973 meeting be waived and that they be approved as distributed t0 the Commission; motion carried unani- mously. C'." NEW COMMISSIONER Chairman Lively welcomed newly appointed Commissioner Matteoni.~-"Hef..noted that Commissioner Matteoni is 34-years-old, resides at 12601 Cambridge Drive,. Saratoga, is married and has three (3) chilHren'nand is employed ~p an attorney by the County Council's Office. Chairman Lively further stated that Commissioner Matt'eoni has served on the Parks and Recreation Commission since 1969 and was Chairman 6f that Commission durin~ 1972. IIo PUBLIC HEARINGS A. V-390 - Anatol Romanoff, Foothill Lane - Request for Variance to Allow Reduction in Lot Width and Area Chairman Lively opened the hearing relative to V-390 at 7:4i P.M. The Secretary stated the Notice of Hearing was mailed. T!~.~e Secretary read a communication received from Mr. Hal Friesen of 12841 Foothill Lane filed in opposition to the proposed Variance. He, also, read a Statement of Reason filed by the applicant. Mr. Shelley Willjams, realtor present to represent the applicant, stated that 1) the tract map shows most .of the lots on Foothill Lane as one-half acre in size, but the lot sizes in the area do vary.from 10,000-square feet in size to approximately one-and-0ne-half acres. The applicant purchased this property approximately ten (10) years ago and at that time could-have divided-.eheTproperty as is currently p~opOsed~.~ Mr. Williams further stated, in a~swer to an inquiry from Commissioner Marshall,'that the property is on 'septic tank and the Sanitary District states it is almost impossible to serve this property by sewer. The drainage with the septic tank is excellent due to the type of soil. Planning Commission Minutes - February 26~ 1973 - Continued II. A. V-390 - Continued Mr. Anatol Romanoff, applicant, stated that 1) when he bought this property he thought he was preparing for his old age 2) he worked many years and is now retired 3) he purchased this property as an investment with the assurance it .could be divided and sold in his retirement 4) he has tried to p~eserve this property in its natural state and.has planted many trees and 5) he does not feel that the granting of the subject variance would be an invasion of anyone's privacy. Mr. Leroy Ho Garrett of 12979 Fodthill Lane~ stated that he owns the property located directly to the ;south of Mr. Romanoff's property and he would like to go on record as being in favor of the proposed Variance. Chairman Lively closed the hearing for the evening at 7:56 P.M., directed V-390 continued to the next ~eguIar meeting and referred same to the Var- iance Committee for study and a report. Commissioner Marshall, on behalf iof .the Variance Committee, arranged for an appointment with the applicant for an on-site inspection of the property for Saturday, March 3, 1973 at 9:200 A.M. Bo V-391 - O. H. George, June Way a~dJerries Drive Request for Variance to Allow Reduction in Side Yard Setback Requirements Chairman Lively opened the hearing relative' to V-391 at 7:57 P.M. The Secretary stated the Notice of Hearing was mailed. Mrs. 0".- H. George was present and stated that without a~proval of the subject Variance it will be impossible to place a pool in the rear yard of this property. No 6ne else present wished to comment relative to'this matter. Chairman Lively closed the hearing for the evening at 7:59 P.M., directed V-391 continued to the next regular meeting and referred same to the Var- iance Committee for study' and a report. Commissioner Marshall, on behalf,of the Variance Committee, arranged for' an appointment with the applicant for an on-site inspection 6f the property for Saturday, March 3, 1973 at 9:30 AoM. C. UP-224 - Saratoga Tennis Club, Komina Avenue - Request for Use Permit to Allow Expansion of Tennis Club Chairman Lively opened the hearing relative to. UP-224 at 8:00 P.M. The Secretary stated the Notice of Hearing was mailed. The Secretary then read communications filed in oppostion to the proposed Use Permit by: 1) Mr. and Mrs. Thomas A. Tisch of 14735 Aloha Avenue (alsO, speaking..' for Mr. and Mrs. Tom Brubaker of 14725 Aloha Avenue). 2) Mr. and Mrs.~Roy P. Crawford of 14711. Aloha Avenue. Planning Commission Minutes - February 26~ 1973 - Continue~ II. C0 UP-224 - Continued Mr. Warren Heid, architect, present to represent the applicant, stated that 1) the proposed plan suggests two (2) new tennis courts and a'new club house, 704-square feet in size, which will not accommodate very · many people, but will con. tain showers 2) the tennis club has a member- ship of sixty-seven families; however, there are only about Sixty (60) active persons 3) the hours of Operation are from 8:00 A.M. to dark 4) an entrance and exit driveway is proposed 5). every attempt has been made to be aware of the neighborhood problems re parking of club members 6) the club has been a legal Don-conforming use in Saratoga since 1920' and active as a tennis club since 1930 7) the Use Permit previously granted was, unfortunately, allowed to lapse and 8) every effort is being made to make certain that the drainage from the site will be in a manner that will be'satisfactory to everyone concerned. Commissioner Smith explained that the plan shows the building situated on the property line rather than.within the setbacks. Mr. Heid explained that this building could be located elsewhere on the property and the setback requirements met. Commissioner Belanger inquired if the applicant intended to increase the membership once this expansion is completed? Mr. Held replied that no expansion of the membership is planned. The proposed expansion will allow the present members to play tennis on a more frequent basis. Chairman Lively asked if the by-laws of the club restrict the number of members? Mr. Heid answered that h~.woUld 8btain a copy of the by-laws and submit same for review. Commissioner Belanger requested that Mr. Held supply information relative to the percentage of members who'are from outside of .Saratoga. Mrs. Kay Crawford of 1471.1 AlohalAvenue stated that she is primarily interested in this matter because her home is directly adjacent to the club. A petition has been put together in opposition to the proposed tennis court expansion (she then.submitted the petition containing thirty~one (31) signatures). Mrs. Crawford further stated that Komina and Aloha Avenues, along with Lomita, are among the worst roads in the City of Saratoga and any increase in traffic on these roads should not be allowed. Chairman Lively asked Mrs. Crawf~rd how'bhe~ohld..feel about the proposed expansion if the club membership:was not expanded and the parking problem was solved by providing off-street.parking? Mrs. Crawford explained that the.proposed off-street parking is very acceptable; however, the addition of two (2) new tennis courts is not. Mrs. Tisch of 14735 Aloha AvenueZsubmitted a petition containing thirteen (13) signatures in oppostion to the proposed addition. Said petition urged that the permit for. expansion of the club be denied; however, if approval is granted a list of restrictions included in the petition should be followed. Mr. Held explained that the club~s activities are not numerous, it is not a social club, but primarily'an organization geared toward serious tennis playing. Charlotte Thompson of 20574 Komina Avenue suggested that the first court be removed from the sidewalk area. Mr. Held explained that an engineer did survey that area and it was determined that this court is within the property lines. -3= Planning Commission Minutes - February 26 ~i 1973 -Coo~t~n.B.~. II. C. UP-224 Mr. Gordon P.' Naugle of 20620 Komina Avenue stated that 1) he concurs with the objections of the residents of the area 2) expansion of the club would change the character of the neighborhood and 3) he is a member of the tennis club and the proposed expansion has not been approved by the membership. Mrs. Dorothy Manfred, Secretary of the Saratoga Tennis Club, stated that 1) the club membership will not!be increased 2) the expansion will simply allow the present members.to play more tennis 3) this'is not social club and there has never been a party at the club and 4)' there are some members who do not live in Saratoga, but they are few in number. Mr..R. Cornes'of 14774 Aloha Avenue stated that the traffic on Komina and Aloha Avenues is already hazardous and with the club members park- ing on the .street it becomes even worse. Mr. Gary Vick, treasurer of the Saratoga Tennis Club, stated that with the proposed parking area expansion the on-street parking would be eliminated. Chairman Lively asked if the proposed expansion has been approved by the membership? Mr. Vick explained that the membership has discussed the subject expansion for many years; however, a votei~of the membership has not been taken. Chairman Lively stated that any action on the part of the Planning Commission should be postponed until approval of the membership is obtained. Mr. Heid explained that the club has only one meeting of its membership per year and it is not possible to take care of all business at this one meeting; therefore, a Board of Directors is given the authorization to make decisions'and take action.. Commissioner Matteoni stated tha~ he would be disposed to put the matter over until membership approval is provided. Commissioner Marshall agreed that the membership should be allowed to vote on the proposed expansion and, also, be made aware of the restrictions that will be imposed by the City.l He further stated that it would be appropriate for the applicant to!present a modified plan consistent with the-setback requirements. Chairman Lively closed the hearing for the evening at 8:45 P.M., continued UP-224 to the next regular meeting, and referred the matter to the Subdivi- sion Committee for study and a report. III0 BUILDING SITES AND SUBDIVISIONS A. SDR-1016 Robert Schiro, Upper Hill Drive - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot - Continued from February 13~ 1973 CommissiOner Smith explained that this applicant has submitted a revised map. The applicant stated~he..revi~wed~the~ propOSed conditions of approval listed in the Building Site Committee Report relative to SDR-1018 and expressed satisfaction with same. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the Building Site Committee Report dated February 26, 1973 relative to SDR-1016 be adopted and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A-i", filed February 14, 1973) be approved subject to the:conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. Planning Commission Minutes - February 26~ 1973 - Continued III. B. SDR-1018 - Mary E. Standard~ Via Colina - Building Site Approval - 1 Lot Commissioner Smith explained that this lot was granted Building Site Approval approximately three (3) years ago. The Secretary stated that a letter has been received from the Sanitation District stating that this lot Can be sewered by the existing system. Mrs. Sylvia Williams, realtor present to represent the applicant, was present and statedshe had reviewed the proposed conditions of approval and expressed satisfaction with~same. Commissioner Marshall recommended that the Building Site Committee Report relative to SDR-1018 be amended~by adding the following condition "K": "K. Comply with specific requirements of the Sanitation District." Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the Building Site Committee ..Report dated February 26, 1973 relative to SDR-1D18 be adopted, as amended, and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed February 8, 1973) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. C. SDR-IO19 - Malachy Moran, SaratOga Avenue.-'Subdivision Approval - 6 Lots - Continued from February 13~ 1973 Commissioner Smith advised thatithere were some points raised at the last meeting that..needed clarification relative to road improvements in connection with SDR-1Ol9. _The applicant has now submitted a letter and a revised.map clarifying th~se points. The Secretary, in%answer to an inquiry from Commissioner Belanger, stated that the applicantdid meet with the representatives from the Fire Depart- ment and they agreed to again meet with the applicant at the time he is · ready to.pave the turn-around a~ea. (Commissioner Martin arrived atithis time.) The applicant was present and s~ate'd he had reviewed the proposed conditions of approval and expressed satisfaction with same. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the Subdivi~ion..,~. Committee R~port dated February 26, 1973'relative to SDR-1019 be adopted and that the tentatiye. map (Exhibit "A-I", filed February 26, 1973) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carriedunanimously. D. SD-1020 - Donald Comer~ Pierce Road - Subdivision Approval - 7 Lots The Secretary recommended that SD-1020 be continued to the next .regUlar meeting. Chairman Lively so directed. E. SDR-1022 - Jack Hawver, Saratoga-Los Gatos Road - Building Site ApprDval - 1 Lot The applicant was present and stated he had reviewed the proposed condi- tions of approval and. expressed:satisfaction with same. Commissioner Marshall'j'p~inted oht tha~ this is an extreme flag-lot and traffic will be particularly hazardous if left turns are permitted out of this driveway. The Secretary explained that th~ State Division of Highways will review that matter at the time applicant is made for an Encroachment Permit. -5- Planning Commission Minutes - February 26~. 1973 - Continued III. E0 SDR-1022 - Continued Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the · Building Site Committee Report dated F.ebruary 26, 1973 relative to SDR-1022 be adopted and that the tentative map (Exhibit "A", filed F~bruary 16, 1973) be approved subject to the conditions set forth in said report; motion carried unanimously. F. SDR-1023 - Robert L. Dale~ Peach Hill Road - Buildins Site Approval - 1 Lot The Secretary recommended that this matter be continued to the next regular meeting. · Chairman Lively so directed. RECESS AND RECONVENE IV. DESIGN REVIEW A. A-296 - Shareholders Real EstaterCo. (Franklin Homes), Fourth Street and Springer Avenue - Final Design Review - Landscaping Fourth and' Springer The Assistant Planner explained ~hat the applicant is proposing to convert th~·.·existing apartment comlex into co~dominiums and the landscape plans f~r.7 Fourth and Springer are now.available. Mr. Lyons, present to represent ~he applicant, stated that 1) a park-like appearance is desirable for this'development and the applicant would like to provide a 3-foot strip of landscaping between the curb and Springer Avenue uSingjunipers and ice pla~ts or similar plantings in order to provide a softer impact 2) at Fourth Street there is a very narrow section between the exi~'ting sidewalk and fence and an~,18~in~h,·reduction in the fence is desirable 3) there are existing~trees on'the other side of this fence and by cutting ·the fence down by 18-inches the existing vegetation will show up much better. Commissioner Belanger replied that the fence should really not be lowered any more than 12-inches. The Staff Report relative to A-296 dated February 26, 1973 was read. Commissioner Belanger amended the subject Staff Report. The amendments were duly noted and the revisions on the report were made. Commissioner Belanger moved, seconded by Commissioner Martin, that the Staff Report dated February 26, 1973 be adopted, as amended, and that Final Design Approval be granted~for the,l~ndscaping treatment along ~'6'U~ Street a~'d Springer Avenue as shown on E~h~i'~"'~"'.and Subject to the-conditions stated i__cn.'-said report; motion carried"~n~nimously. B. A-403 - Mobil Oil Corp., Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road - Final Design Review - Reconstruction of Service Station - Continued from February 13~ 1973 The Staff Report rei~tive to A-403 dated February 26, 1973 was read. Commissioner B~langer amended the subject Staff Report. The amendments were noted and the revisions on the report were.made, Commissioner Belanger moved, seconded by Commissioner·Martin, that the Staff Report dated February 26, 1973 be adopted, as amended, and that Final Design Approval be granted for reconstruction of the Mobil z~Oil service station as shown on Exhibits "D" 'and "H" and .subject to the conditions stated in said report; motion carried unanimously. -6- Plannin8 Commission Minutes - February 26~ 1973 - Continued IV. C. A-408 - Jiffy Gas (Phillips "66"), Big Basin Way - Final Design Review - Remodelin~ and Re-signing of Service Station The Staff Report relative to A-4Q8 dated February 26, 1973 was read. Commissioner Belanger amended the subject Staff Report and the revisions were made as ~ecommended. Commissioner Belanger moved, seconded by Commissioner Martin, that the Staff Report dated February 26, 1973 be adopted, as amended, and that Final Design Approval be granted!for the remodeling and resigning of the Jiffy Gas Service Station as~shown on Exhibits "A" and "B" and subject to the conditions stated..in said report; motion carried unanimously. V. CITY COUNCIL REPORT Commissioner Martin gave a brief summaFy of items reviewed and action taken at the City Council meeting of February 21,71973. One. item of particular interest was the City Council approval of the open-flame for the Open Hearth Restaurant. This open-flame had been denied by the Planning CommisSion on the basis it constituted a sign. Chairman Lively requested the Secretary to obtain a written opinion from the City Attorney relative to this matter. VI. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. Bohlman Road Study The Secretary explained that som~ maps have been displayed for review in connection with this matter; however, an aerial photo is being prepared and that will provide the opportunity to develop a land-use plan. The ar'ea located. within the City Limits in the Bohlman Road area equals 160-acres and contains 60-existing parcels,' 40..-o~ which are developed, and 20 which' are under development. There is :a possibility of an additional 16-parcels making a total of an incorporated area of 76-parcels. The study done on the remainder of 'the land in the 2Bohlman Road area indicates that this area will develop further in the :next five (5) years because there are 92-acre8 of."deVelopabte'tand-.'and.ran"additional established 29-parcels - 10'u~developed and 19 developed; thereby, involving a possible total of ll9-dwelling units. Commissioner Marshall asked if tEere were any plans to put water up Bohlman Road? He stated that if'he remembered correctly the Sanitation District indicated that development would not be allowed in this area unless sewers were provided and this cannot be done unless the water problem in the area is solved. Further there is no way to widen this road and development of the area could not occur wiTthout..~oad improvements. Commissioner Smith explained thatr the slope density requirements will eliminate a considerable number of the potential sites. The Secretary, in answer to an inquiry from Chairman Lively, stated that the Boht~an-Road Emergency Ordinance can be extended by the City Council. Chairman Lively directed this matter continued to the next regular meeting for further discussion. Planning Commission Minutes - February 26~ 1973 - Continued VI0 B. Urban Service Area Plan The Secretary stated that the City Council~ at their l~p~ meeting, modified slightly the Urban Service Area Plan. The Older Ranch and Seven Springs Ranch have been put into long-term open-space rather than the use shown on the Urban Service Area Plan. This was done because of the proposal by the Mid-peninsula Recreation .~..°':.~'..'.'~ Department to acquire these two (2) ranches. The developed area of Rolling Hills Road next to the golf course and the Peck and Garrett properties have all been left in'the Urban Service Area Plan. Mt./Eden R~ad and Apollo Heights area that are outside the City Limits -ar~l'.scheduled for potential development within the next five (5) years. The Secretary further explained,;ih. answer to an inquiry from Commissioner Martin, that if the property owners in these unincorporated areas decided to develop their land they would be required to annex to the City of Saratoga. C. Cannestra Encroachment Permit The Secretary explained that normally the City .Qrdinance allows the Department of Public Works to issue Encroachment Permits in public right-of-ways; however, in the case of basketball posts and backboards, etc. the Planning Commission must make a ruling. Mr. Cannestra has made application for an Encroachment Permit for permission to retain a basketball post and backboard, which now exists on the public right-of-way.. A complaint relative to same ~ad been received from one of the neighbors after which Mr. Cannestra was contacted and asked to apply'for an Encroachment Permit. A written Communication filed in oppostion to the subject request has been received from Mr. John J. Saranceno of 12941 Brandywine Drive. Also, pictures are available to explain this situation more clearly. Commissioner Marshall noted that it seems Mr. Cannestra could put the basketball hoop over his own garage and it would serve effectively the same purpose. The Secretary stated that it is the Staff recommendation that the subject Encroachment Permit be denied. Commissioner Belanger moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, that the application for EncroachmentzPermit to allow a: basketball hoops with backboard and posts on Ci__ty right-of-way be denied and tha_t__th~ ~ applicant be required to remove same from said right-of-way; motion carried~ · unanimously'~' ' D. UP-80 - Church of Ascension~ Prospect Ro~d - Traffic Study Mr. Dan Trinidad, Assistant DireCtor of Public Works,~referred to his '.report an~ accompanying plan rel.ative to a traffic. study concerning parking lot access points on City streets at the Church of Ascension location. He gave an oral summary ~f'~h'~ report outlining the recommendations made as a result of the traffic study. Commissioner Smith stated that he did not feel the Church of Ascension really has a problem, but instead it is the Prides Crossing Homeowner's Association that ±s'~ creating a problem. Mr. Trinidad explained that the Church of AscenSion has not been contacted relative to the proposed plan. Commissioner Matteoni suggested that the proposed plan not be approved at this time and'that the representatives of the Church of Ascension be allowed to review the proposed plan and the subject'rpport. Mr. Ray Muzzy of the Prides Crossing Homeowners Association was present and stated the proposed plan did meet with the approval of his group. Chairman Lively directed the matter continued to the next regular meeting and requested Mr. Trinidad to contact the representatives for the Church of Ascenision and discuss the proposed plan .and ~eport ba~k. to_._the Commi.ssion ..... at the next reguiar meeting. -8- Planning Commission Minutes - February 26~ 1973 - Continued VI. E. Miljevich and Garcia Properties The Secretary explained that it wlll be necessary to find out from the City Attorney where the City legally stands in connection with the "C-V" Emergency Ordinance, which directly affects both of these properties. The Secretary further explained s~me new exhibits prepared for this property. : 1) The exhibit f~r the corner property has open-space extending out through the multi- residential units. With approximately 48-units on 6-acres arong with three (3) small public office buildings. 2) The exhibits 'for the Miljevich property shows a commercial ldevelopment and th~n at the extreme rear Zof the property a 40-unit-multi- family residential complex on five (5) acres. The Secretary stated that, perhaps., a combination of both plans can be prepared. ~ Chairman Lively stated it may be difficult to convince the property owners in this area tO accept any of these plans. The question that mustbe answered is: What basis.for denial can be offered to either of these property owners if the plan they submit is unacceptable to the City? : The Secretary stated that the Planning Commission has the authority to deny any proposal submitted by the applicant. Mr. Bob Beyer, City.Manager, was.present and stated that the Planning Commission is not under any undue pressure to approve any plan offered by the applicant since the ordinance has been presented by the City Council which is to take the place of the Emergency Ordinance and along with that alternate proposals for development of this property have been prepared. Chairman Lively recommended that ~y.~lopment of these properties be postponed until after the 1973 Major General Plan ~evi·e~2·'' VII. COMMUNICATIONS A~ WRITTEN West Valley'Junior College The Secretary explained that in the Commissioner's folders there is some information relative to West Valley Junior College regarding location of the warehouse ~ndi.~th~r buildings. Chairman Lively stated that the ~ity should require the college to resubmit a copy of their revised'Master Plan.· Commissioner Marshall explained that the college states that location of the warehouse is aimed at Loc~tion "B" only if Site "A" is utilized · as a'parking area; however, the residents of Short Hill Court are not in complete agreement with this proposal. -9- Planning Commission Minutes - February 26~ 1973 - Con~.inued VII. B.. ORAL Family GrOcery Store and Other Buildings -.Signs The Assistant Planner explained that the Family Market complex' on Quito Road has requested permission to revamp their fr~e-standing pole sign. The sign has been reviewed by the Design Review Committee. There is some question relative'to retention of the free-standing sign since it has not been determined whether~'th~scomplex can actually be considered a shopping center and thereby allowed to have a free-standing sign. The Secretary explained that the Planning Commission could require that the signs.be placed on the-individual buildings rather than on a free-standing,sign. Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Commissioner Martin, that the applicant be asked to place' individual signs on each building and remove the free-standing sign or remove the sign advertising the nursery from the free-standing sign .and leave it as it is with no changes; motion carried unanimously. Landscaping - Prides Crossing SOuth Subdivision Commissioner Martin stated thatzhe did notice that the old landscaping along Cox Avenue is being removed and that the decorative fence and landscaping in the new section Of the Prides Crossing South Subdivision is shaping up nicely. He further stated that he noticed the plants in '.~he area of Miller and Cox seem to be dead. Commissioner Marshall stated that it is questionable whether these plants are dead or just in bad condition from the freeze that occurred during the winter. Study.-Session Commissioner Belanger suggested that a Study Session of the Planning Commissioner be scheduled. Chairman Lively suggested March 19, 1973 as a date for the StUdy 'Session. The Secretary suggested that the memo dated January 25, 1973 submitted by the Planning Director which Outlines a program for change in the Planning Commission and Planning Department operations be discussed at the Study Session. Chairman Lively recommended that the Commissioners examine the memo and submit their comments to Mr.~ Beyer, City Manager, and he in turn can discuss same with the Planning Director and Staff. Mr. Beyer stated that a Study Session would be an appropriate time for consideration of the subject memo and he would accept any input relative to same that members of the Commission might have. It was agreed by members of the .Commission that a Study Session of the Planning Commission would be held on March 19, 1973. -10- Plannin~ Commission Minutes - February 26.,...1973 - Continued VII. B. ORAL Guests Cha'irman Lively acknowledged, with pleasure, the presence of Councilman 'and Mrs. Dwyer, Mr.·B~y~-Cit·y~!Manager,~Mrs·-'Parker~· Mrs..~Ow~n,"and Mr~·.Frampto~ of. the"Good·lGoVer~meht"Group. He, also, thanked Mrs. Parker and Mrs. Owen for the coffee served at recess. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Matteoni, that the meeting ~f F~Bruary.~26~ 1973~'be '~djourn~d ·at 11:25 P.M.; motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Stanley M. Walker, Secretary Saratoga PlanningCommission j -tl -