HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-28-1984 Planning Commission Minutes ~- ~ ~
CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING CO~ISSION
MINUTES
DATE: Wednesday, March 28, 1984 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: City Council Chambers, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA
TYPE: Regular Meeting
ROUTINE ORGANIZATION
Roll Call
Present: Commissioners Harris, Hlava, McGoldrick, Schaefer and Siegfried
(Commissioner Harris arrived at 7:35 p.m.)
Absent: Commissioners Crowther and Peterson
Minutes
Commissioner McGoldrick moved to waive the reading of the minutes of March
14, 1984 and approve as distributed. Commissioner Hlava seconded the motion,
which was carried unanimously.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. SDR-1561 - Mr. and Mrs. Levy, 19800 Glen Una Drive, Approval of Conditions.
of Building Site Approval
Staff clarified that the condition in the Memorandum relative to the required
interim improvements would be that the property be widened to 22 feet on the
City portion and there would be a Deferred Improvement Agreement on the County
portion. Commissioner Schaefer requested that it be left at 18 feet on both
sides, with a 1" cap to go on the City portion as well as the County portion.
She explained that, in talking to the neighbors, it was their feeling that it
should not be widened to 22 feet, in order to preserve the rural aesthetics
and because of the safety factor. Discussion followed on the improvements.
CommiSsioner Hlava noted that the memo states that there will be no sudden
bulge and the widening will taper and be virtually unnoticed. She commented
that she did not feel that 22 ft. was a very wide road and most of the improve-
ments have been put under a Deferred Improvement Agreement.
Commissioner McGoldrick moved to.change Condition 1 to read "Widen pavement to
provide.two 9 ft. lanes" and Condition shall read "1 inch overlay of entire
street fronting property (minimum 18' width). Commissioner Siegfried seconded
the motion, which was carried 4-1, with Commissioner Hlava dissenting, stating
that she would prefer the Staff recommendation of two ll ft. lanes.
2. GPA-83-1-A Consideration of Draft Housing Element and Environmental Impact
Report; continued from March 14, 1984
Chairman Schaefer suggested that this matter be continued to the meeting on
April 11, 1984, and it will be forwarded to the City Council with the Second
Unit Ordinance.
The public hearing was opened at 7:45 p.m. No one appeared to address the
Commission. It was directed that this be continued to April 11, 1984.
3. A-928 - Dwayne Richards, Request for Design Review Approval to construct
a split level single family residence at 14012 Palomino Way in
the NHR Zoning District; continued from March 14, 1984
It was directed that this item be continued to April 11, 1984.
4a. SDR-1545 - Warren Sturla, Request for Tentative Building Site Approval and
4b. V-615 Design Review Approval for four office condominiums and Variance
4c. A-900 Approval for a reduced side setback at the southwest corner of
Cox Avenue and Saratoga Creek Drive in a P-A Zoning District;
continued from March 1'4, 19'84
Chairman Schaefer commented that this matter has been at study sessions and
she understands that there has been a request for changes. The applicant stated
that he would like the Commission to vote tonight on the project presented.
The public hearing wa's opened at 7:46 p.m.
- 1 -
Ptan~ing Commission Page 2
M.~e~ing Minutes 3/28/84
SDR-1545, V-615 and A-900 (cont.)
Dr. Sturla, the applicant, described the proposal, stating that he was no
longer requesting a variance for compact parking. He addressed the trash
disposal location. The height of the fence around the enclosure was dis-
cussed.
Commissioner Harris commented that Jim Russell had called her, expressing
concern .that there were not enough parking spaces. The parking was addressed,
· and it was noted that it does meet the ordinance.
Commissioner Siegfried moved to approve A-900, per Exhibits B, C and D and the
Staff Report dated March 20, 1984, with the condition that the fence around
the trash enclosure be no less than 5 feet in height and at least 1 foot higher
than the trash container; deleting in Condition 2 that the enclosure shall be
kept out of the landscape strip, and adding a condition that at least a space
in front shall be marked "no parking" He moved to approve V-615, per Exhibit
B and t]~e Staff Report dated March 20, 1984, making the findings, and SDR-1545
per Exhibit B-2 and the Staff Report dated March 20, 1984., as previously
amended. Commissioner Hlava seconded the motion, which was carried unanimously
5-0.
5a. Negative Declaration SDR- 1549 Horvath
5b. SDR-1549 Frank and Dagmar Horvath, Request for Tentative Building Site
Approval to create two (2) lots at 22122 Mr. Eden Road in the
NHR Zoning District; continued from March 14, 1984
Staff described the project, disCussing.the changes to the Staff Report. The
proposed grading was discussed. 'It was noted that the City Geologist's report
should read "Final Building Site Approval", instead of "Tentative Building.
Site Approval". Commissioner .Hlava gave a Land Use Committee report. She
commented that the proposed pad on the original plans was probably a little bit
too far up the hill, and the new Staff Report shows it a little further down.
She added that she felt having a pad that was stepped up the hill would require
less grading and would. more closely follow the contour of the land; however, the
Staff Report refers to grading for a flat pad.
'The public hearing was opened at 8:05 p.m. Mr. Horvath agreed to a stepped
foundation. Commissioner Siegfried moved to close the public hearing. Com-
missione~ Hlava seconded the motion, which was carried unanimously.
It was' determined that Condition VIII-A would be changed, to add: "Submission of
.plan shall include a stepped foundation on the residence so as to cause less
grading on the site." Commissioner McGoldrick moved to approve the Negative
Declaration for SDR-1549. Commissioner Hlava seconded the motion, which was
carried unanimously 5-0. Commissioner McGoldrick moved to approve SDR-1549,
per the amended Staff Report reflecting the change to VIII-A, and Exhibit B-3.
Commissioner Hlava seconded the motion, which was carried unanimously 5-0.
6a. A-942 Charles Aring, Request for Design Review .Approval to construct
6b. V-630 a second story addition, Variance Approval for a 11'6" side
6c. 'SDR-1562 yard setback and Building Site Approval for a greater than 50%
expansion at 20080 Mendelsohn Lane in the R~l-20,000 zoning
district
The proposal was described by Staff. St'aff indicated that they have noted
options regarding the variance and, therefore, cannot make the findings and
are recommending denial of it, and approval of the design review.
Commjssioner Hlava gave a Land Use Committee report, describing the site and
the proposal.
The public hearing ~as opened at 8:10 p.m.
Dr. Aring, the applicant, submitted letters of support from three neighbors.
He gave a presentation on the project. He d~iscussed the conditions for the
street improvements and the expense involved.
Dennis Burrow, architect, discussed the project. He indicated that if the
garage is expanded the total expansion would be about 62%; if the garage is not
permitted it would be very close to 50%. The improvements and the garage were
addressed.
- 2 -
Planning Commission e Page 3
M, eeti~g Minutes 3/28/84
A-942, V-630 and SDR-1562 (cont.)
Bill Henderson, representing Mrs. Oxendine, spoke in opposition to the garage
and the location of the driveway. He indicated that the second story windows
look down into the kitchen area of the Oxendine home. He noted that widening
the corner would give better visibility access to the traffic pattern.
Margaret Dennis, 20201 Hill Avenue, referenced her letter and spoke in opposi-
tion to the proposal. She stated that the logical place to put the driveway
would have been on Mendelsohn Lane, and there is a lot of open space on the
other side of the property-to expand.
Gloria Henderson addressed the two accessory structures on the site that are
not in compliance with the ordinance. She expressed the hope that they will be
removed, as mentioned in the Staff Report.
Mr. Bell, Mendelsohn Lane, spoke in support of the applications. He stated
that he felt the driveway change was a good move because of the safety hazard.
He indicated that he did not feel that the road needs to be widened in that
area.
The resident of 20161 Hill spoke regarding the dangerous corner.
Dr. Call, Hill and Montalvo,-indicated that he felt the new location of the
driveway is better. He stated that he did not feel the options regarding the
garage were very viable. He added that he did not feel that Hill needs widen-
ing. Dr. Call also commented that he feels the second story is better than
expanding in the back.
'C~'mni~'s'~'~'~h~'~"'~'~ '~6'~m~i~'~ ~'t~'a ~' i f' '~'~ ~' ~.r~h ~ ~e'a-11 ~' '~ ~ ~"'~'h'~"' a~un t '-'~ "'e x.~
b~;~o~'lie='~6'~.t~v~.ay"t'~"'~e-~"~' "i:~'l"w'~H! d'~"~ ~' ,~'o'z'~Z'~dk~..~nb='~ffe'r' :g'~: 'B'h:~ ~-~b:ack ' ' .....
s ti i s
e~S~k'i'o'~"s~'CB, 'dei~'i'Hg'~FHS"~B~6Be'~"~a~e.' ..... ~giie j~'ed th~t"a 'se:~dnd'"
alternative would be deleting the proposed garage and looking at the addition
to see if enough space can be deleted to put it under 50% expansion.
Commissioner McGoldrick. indicated that she would not be able to vote in favor
of the variance. She ~tated that she has no problem with the second story and
does not think Hill needs widening.
Commissioner Harris stated that she cannot support the variance for the garage
and would encourage the applicant to come under the S0% expansion. She
indicated that she does not feel that widening Mendelsohn is going to help
traffic; it would create more of a hazard.
commis s i one r S .'w&'~!ja"~l~k~l%'tB'jL,i~6'~-?F~' "P'8'~ ~"ib.{1 i'f i es
~"."a~6;k~')he.'..n'eed for a variance. Commissioner Schaefer agreed. She added
that she could not anticipate a garage entrance going into Mendelsohn, since
it is so dangerous now. She also commented that she would like to review the
windows in the second story and perhaps do something so they do not look down
into the kitchen area of the neighbors.
There was a consensus to take this matter to a study session. The applicant
agreed, and it was directed th. at it be continued to a study session on April
17, 1984 and the regular meeting on April 25, 1984.
7. A-943 - Mr. and Mrs. Benson, Request for Design Review Approval to con-
struct a two-story, single family residence at 20433 Montalvo
Road in the R-i-40,000 zoning district
Staff described the proposal. They noted'a letter submitted by the applicant
from the neighbor in support. The landscaping was discussed, and it was
determined that "per Staff review and approval" would be added to Condition
No. 2.
Commissioner Hlava gave a Land Use Committee Report, describing the site.
The public hearing was opened at 8:58 p.m. The applicant agreed with the
Staff Report.
Dr. Call, Mendelsohn and Hill, stated that they appreciate the fact that the
size has been reduced; however, they still feel it is too large. He added
that he likes Staff's suggestion of one opening on the driveway.
The applicant gave a presentation on the project, stating that he had reviewed
the' plans with the neighb'ors. The circular driveway which has been proposed
3
PlanDing Commission Page 4
Me~ti~g Minutes 3/28/84
A-943 (cont.)
by the applicant was addressed.
Mrs. Marino, Montalvo Road, described the street and curve.
Commissioner Hlava moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Siegfried
seconded the motion, which was carried unanimously.
The driveway was further di. scussed. Commissioner Harris commented that she
felt.both ends of the driveway are dangerous. Commissioner McGoldrick indi-
cated that she could not approve two entrances on that street. Commissioner
Hlava stated that she disagrees, indicating that she feels this plan is far
superior to the previous plan on this lot.
Commissioner Siegfried stated that he thinks this is a good plan, and while
there is some concern about the entrances, he thinks that when the Bensons
'entertain, given where the property is sited, having substantial usable area
to get in and out is a plus. He moved to approve A-943, modifying Condition
No. 2 to read that the landscaping plans shall be submitted for staff review
and approval, and modifying Condition No.'5' to allow for the circular driveway
as proposed, per Exhibi'ts B and C and the Staff Report dated March 20, 1984 as
~amended. Commissioner Hlava seconded the motion.
Commissioner Schaefer commented that she feels that Montalvo is dangerous and
when there are parties it is very important to keep any parking off of Montal-
vo, and the proposed driveway will make it easier for cars to get out.
The vote was taken. The motion was carried 4-1, with Commissioner McGoldrick
dissenting.
Break - 9:15 9:33 p.m.
8a. A-944 - Mr. and Mrs. Sun, Request'for Design Review Approval to construct
8b. UP-553 - a two-story, single family residence and Use Permit Approval to
construct a cabana in the rear yard setback area at 19951 Durham
Court in the R-i-20,000 zoning district
Staff described the applications. They indicated that they can make the find-
ings and recommend approval of the variance and the design review. The cor-
respondence received in opposition was noted.
Commissioner Hlava gave a Land Use Committee report, stating that there is
heavy screening on the neighbor's property. She added that there will be no
big impact.
The public hearing was opened at 9:35 p.m.
Mrs. Jean Johnston, 14210 Douglas, spoke in opposition to the project. She
commented that the house was going to fill up the whole lot and the design
does not go with the rest of the neighborhood. She objected to both the size
of the house and the smallness of the' lot. She noted that her property is
lower than 6 ft. than the Suns' property.
Annette '~V~Ol~,.. 19952 Durham, commented that she enjoys the open_ feeling
of the neighborhood as it i.s. She stated' that the house is
theirs, and she objects to the privacy factor and also the color of the' ~ile.
She referenced .the letter from the Pasteurs in opposition. She added that she
does like th.e way the house is sited to one side. .Discussion followed on the
height of the ]home and the size of the lot.
.Mr. Sun, the applicant, commented that there are two-stories on Durham and
they had assumed it would be consistent with the neighborhood.
Commissio'ner Siegfried moved to close the public hearing. CommisSioner Hlava
Seconded the motion, which was carried unanimously.
Discussion followed on the landscaping,'the design and the roof material. It
was noted that there is a house across the street. with a tile roof. Commis-
sioner Siegfried commented that by having this two-story house there is a
rather significant side yard setback on the one side of 38 feet; with a one-
story there would be a 1S ft. setback on both sides. He moved to approve
UP-533, making the findings, per Exhibits B and E and the Staff Report dated
March 19, 1984, and A-944, subject to Exhibits B, C and D and the Staff Report
dated March'19, 1984, including the condition in the Staff Report that the
Plan~.ing Commission ~' Page S
~eting Minutes 3/28/84
A-944 and UP-553 (cont.)
second story deck be removed, adding that fast growing landscaping, 15 gallon
size, be planted subject to staff review, and that the landscaping be com-
pleted prior to occupancy. Commissioner Hlava seconded the motion, which was
carried unanimously 5-0. The 10-day appeal period was noted.
9a. A-945 - Bank of America, RequeSt for Variance Approval for compact' parking
9b. V-632 - and Design Review Approval for exterior changes and a small
addition at 1'4476 Big Basin Wa'y in the C-C zoning district
It was directed that this matter be continued to April 11, 1984.
10a.A-946 - Mr. and Mrs. Berris, Request for Design Review Approval to con-
10b.V-634 - struct a two-story, single family residence which exceeds 6200
sq. ft. and Variance Approval to exceed 30 ft. in building
height at 14486 Leland Circle in the R-i-40,000 zoning district
Staff described the applications. They described the site and indicated that
they were able to make the findings and recommend approval of both applications.
Commissioner Hlava gave a Land Use Committee Report, noting that there was a
foundation. sitting on the site from the previous design. She commented that the
excessive height is basically toward the rear of the property and has no impact
on anyone.
The public hearing was opened at 10:06 p.m. No one appeared to address the
Commission. It was moved and seconded to close the public hearing.
Commissioner McGoldrick moved to approve A-946 and V-634, making the findings,
per the Staff Report dated March 16, 1984, and Exhibits B, C, D and E for
A-946 and Exhibits B, C and E for V-634. Commissioner Hlava seconded the
motion, which was carried unanimously 5-0.
DESIGN REVIEW
11. A-660(a) Joseph Masek, 14435 Big Basin, Modification of Design Review
Approval.; continued from March 14, 1984
It was noted that this matter has been at a study session. Staff discussed
the modification. They noted that there should be a condition added, requir-
ing revised elevations., since they do not show the cantilevered bay windows.
Commissoner Hlava commented that she has some real concerns with having under-
ground parking for retail. Commissioner Schaefer agreed, stating that she
feels that the only reason the underground par.king would be approved at tl~is
time is that it was approved by the City before; if it were a new application
she would not go along with it.
Mr. Masek, the applicant, addressed the entrance to the parking garage, stat-
ing.that it was 18 feet. Commissioner' Schaefer suggested that a condition
could be added that it be widened. by 4 feet, provided that it would be struc-
turally sound. Mr. Masek commented that widening it would loseZj'~the space for
the garbage dumpster or one parking space. The handicapped ramp and plantings
were discussed.
The Commission addressed the parking. Commissioner Siegfried pointed out that
the building was approved with the parking the way it is, and there is nothing
that the applicant is asking by way of modification that changes the number
of parking places that he needs.
Commissioner Schaefer stated that she could not vote for the modification
without the entrance to the parking garage being widened, and she would
be willing to accommodate the fact by a restriping to gain the parking place.
Commissioner Hlava stated that, even though she brought up the subject, she
feels there is a real fairness issue here. She added that she feels the Com-
mission shouldn't necessarily be bound by previous decisions if they were not
particularly good decisions; on the other hand Mr. ~4asek has been going through
this process for so long.
The parking ratio was discussed. Commissioner Siegfried stated that he could
approve the modification by asking the appl. icant to come back to Staff with
any possibility of restriping or doing anything that would improve the usabil-
ity of the parking.
- 5 -
.Plan~ing Commission ~ ~ 'Page 6
A-660(a) (cont.)
Mr. Masek noted that in order. to restripe he would lose space along the
walkway. He commented that the project was previously approved by the City
'and he discussed the expense of taking the 'plan back to a civil engineer.
The City Attorney gave the background of the project and clarified that the
Commission could' request that the entry be widened because they are dealing
with a new application at this time. FIe added that, on Mr. Masek's behalf,
however, it should be remembered that there 'seems to be a general consensus
~b2~T~the merchants in the Village'that one of their problems is that their own
employees tend to park in front of the stores. Therefore, if Mr. Masek has
some internal rules that require employee parking under.the building, at least
he can be assured that'the spaces are used to some extent.
'Discussion followed on the proper wordage of the motion. Commissioner Hlava
then moved to approve A-660(a), per Exhibits B, C, D and E and the Staff
Reports dated May 2, 1979 and March 22, 1984, with th~ added conditions that
(1) the applicant shall widen the entry way by 4 feet and discuss with Staff
the'possibility of doing some restriping to make it a more usable area. If
same is not feasible by reason of structural limitations, the matter shall come
back to the Commission; (2) the construction shall commence within 6 months
from the date of approval, and (3) revised elevations shall be submitted show-
ing the bay windows, for review 'and approval of Staff. Commissioner McGoldrick
seconded the motion, which was carried unanimously 5-0.
12. A-932 - City of Saratoga, Request for Design Review Approval for City
entrance signs at various locations
Staff described the approved signs, indicating that they now have further
information on the le'tter type or material for the letters. After discussion
Commissioner Hlava moved to approve A-932 with bronze colored aluminum cast
lettering. Commissioner McGoldrick seconded the motion, which was carried
unanimously 5-0.
COMMUNICATIONS
Oral
1. Chairman Schaefer read a letter from Camargo Layne regarding the
agenda for the on-site visit on Saturday, March 31, 1984.
2. Eugene Zambetti addressed the Commission regarding his Design Review.
A-854. He requested a modification to make. the home smaller, with a 2-car
garage attached to the house. He explained that he has discovered that they
are now imposing upon an easement with an adjoining neighbor. He noted that
the roof line would be lower and the home would be of less bulk. Discussion
followed on, the modification, and Staff was directed to do a short
after reviewing the new elevations and the matter can come back to the Commis-
sion on the Consent Calendar. It was noted by the Commission that the modifi-
cation would entail a reduction in size of the home.
3. Commissioner Hlava gave a brief report on the City Council meeting
held on March 21, 1984. A copy of the minutes of thi.s meeting is on file in
the City Administration office.
4. Chairman Schaefer thanked the Saratoga News for attending the meet-
ing and the Good Government Group for attending and serving coffee.
ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner McGoldrick moved t.o--adj..o~rn--t~e.!.-mee~.~.ng-~.-=.._The motion was seconded
by Commissioner Hlava. The mo~on--w~s'-.-~a~r~ed--unan-imoUsly and the meeting
was 'adjourned at 11:03 p.m.
SeCret'ary
RSS: cd