Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-15-1990 Planning Commission Minutes C~OMMiTTEE M~_~I CIT F SARATOGA PLANNI COM ON NG -OF-THE-WHOLE REPORi~' DATE: May 15, 1990 PLACE: Community Center Arts & Crafts Room 19655 Allendale Ave. TYPE: Committee-of-the-Whole.meeting MEMBERS PRESENT: Kolstad, Burger, Tucker, Moran STAFF PRESENT: Emslie ITEMS OF DISCUSSION 1. UP-574.1 - BROOKSIDE CLUB, 19127 Cox Avenue The Planning Director reviewed the reasons for the Planning Commission's continuance of the consideration of the dele- tion of the alcohol prohibition. He also reviewed status of compliance with previous conditions of approval. Mr. Askew discussed his opinion that the fencing is not solid nor air tight perimeter fencing. Mr. Steiqer spoke regarding the oft-broken prohibition against alcohol. He also felt that the club's intent was to increase the value of the membership by expanding social events. He stated that neighbors are concerned about noise and the danger of drivers with too much to drink. Mr. Retter reiterated his concern that Brookside has not complied with the Planning Commission's conditions and therefore the Planning Commission should not consider the alcohol relaxation until they have complied. Mr. Salutric spoke and stated that the rules were estab- lished and should continue to be enforced. He felt that the alcohol prohibition is not warranted because they do not have a history of compliance. He felt that safety should also be a consideration. Mrs. Ryder stated, as a Charter Club member, that the intent of the Club's formation did not include serving of alcohol- ic beverages. She also stated that since the trees were trimmed she has more noise and visual impact in her back- yard. Mrs. Askew stated that the .clubhouse has become more of a dominant element rather than an accessory use as stated in the original use permit. She felt that hours for social activity should be curtailed as traffic and voices are dis- turbing to the neighborhood. She also was concerned that children will not be monitored if they are using alcoholic beverages. She also felt the club had forfeited its right , to use its start time. Ann Marie Burger was concerned that the Brookside Club has not met its original conditions and therefore will not con- sider the alcohol until these are met. John Kolstad is concerned that the Club is not complying and penalties should be imposed. He felt that the City Attorney should investigate withdrawal of the approval of the modified hours. Gillian Moran felt that a discussion of hours will enable the City to get at the noise and disturbance problems. 2. DR-89-122 - AMARAL, 12483 Greenmeadow Lane The Planning Director summarized the status of the project and the neighbors' concern. While no plans were received prior to the study session, the Director noted that they were to be presented at the Committee meeting. The applicant presented a revised plan that included hipped roofs, and a minor reduction in height. Neighbors stated that they felt the changes were not effec- tive in reducing their concerns. They stated that the majority of the neighborhood felt the second story was inappropriate because there was no support for this addi- tion. Burger wanted a reduction in square footage in the second story and a further reduction in height. Kolstad felt that the game room can be located on the ground floor behind the garage which could be extended into the front of the home. The Committee felt that substantial revisions need to be accomplished and presented to staff for analysis before a decision can be reached. The Planning Director indicated that the public hearing will need to be continued for 30.to 45 days to enable the prepa- ration of revised plans and staff analysis. 3. SD-88-016 2 YOSHIOKA, 20570 Prospect Road The Planning Director reviewed the results for inspections and investigation into concerns raised by the neighbor. He reported that two fruit trees and one diseased cypress tree we~ removed without permit. Other trees were preserved and protected which should continue to thrive on the property line. The Developer responded to questions from the Committee and presented what he is willing. to do to satisfy the neighbor. The neighbor wanted to seek clarification regarding the ~ ~- second story ~ ~ The Committee reviewed concerns and 'concluded that the second story window be fixed and translucent, that five specimen sized trees be placed in areas where diseased or declining trees were removed without permits, lastly the developer was directed to confer with the neighbors regard- ing any possible damage that may have resulted from the construction to their swimming pool. 4. DR-90-013 2 GRICHUHIN, 20171 Cherry Lane The Planning Director reviewed the concerns expressed by the Commission when the hearing was conducted. The second story side elevation should be set back, and the turret should be de-emphasized. Several neighbors spoke to indicate their support of the plans as they were presented at the initial hearing. The Committee felt that the 'architect should work with staff to prepare revised plans to address issues of the turret and the side elevation. A continuance was necessary to allow the architect the opportunity to prepare revised plans in response to the Committee's 'concerns. 5. DR-90-015 - DIEWERT, 12272 Via Roncole The Planning Director reviewed plans presented that were received too late for inclusion in the Committee packet and stated that the applicants requested the opportunity for the Committee to discuss the revised plans. The applicant and the architect discussed the revisions which they felt were consistent with Planning Commission and staff direction. Several Committee members felt that improvements could be made to reduce the second story appearance by increasing the first story roof. Several Committee members concluded that the changes to the side elevation were an improvement to this elevation. The Committee directed that the applicant continue to work with staff to make further changes to improve the compati- bility of the addition. ADJOURNMENT RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, ning Director