HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-20-1988 HPC Minutes CITY OF SARATOGA
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MINUTES
DATE: Wednesday, January 20, 1988 3:00 p.m.
PLACE: Saratoga Community Library, 13560 Saratoga Avenue, Saratoga
TYPE: Regular Meeting
I. Routine Organization
A. Roll Call
Present: Commissioners Koepernik, Landsness, Voester,
Cameron, Held, Ansnes, Tyrrell
Absent: None
Staff: V. Young
Others: G. Zambetti, P. Olsen, L. Cooper
B. Approval of minutes of 1/6/88
M/S Tyrrell/Voester to approve minutes as submitted.
Passed unanimously.
C. Posting of Agenda
Staff noted the agenda was posted at City Hall on
Friday, January 15, 1988.
D. Oral and Written Communications
Commissioner Landsness noted that she had received a phone
call communication regarding the Nelson Gardens issue,
expressing support for preservation of the gardens. In
regard to this same issue, Commissioner Tyrrell noted that
the City Council reviewed the Heritage Commission's memo
on the gardens at the January 6 meeting; they asked that
it be included as part of the packet for this evening's
hearing on the application.
II. New Business
A. Review planning application for 15231 Quito Road, Meagher-
Smiley House.
V. Young gave a brief introduction to the project proposed
by G. Zambetti and P. Olsen. She displayed the
subdivision map, and noted that the adobe house would be
preserved as part of the application and would be
separated from the other two lots by a 30-ft. wide scenic
easement.
1
Heritage Preservation Commission
Minutes - 1/20/88
Gene Zambetti, representative on the project, described
the proposed subdivision of the parcel and said that the
adobe house would be restored to its original condition
after the subdivision approval. The only part of the house
to be removed was a portion of the southern wing which was
not part of the original structure. He also described the
interior of the house, noting the decorative tiles in
particular.
Peter Olsen, applicant, stated he would like the
Commission's endorsement for preserving the house and that
it was his goal to do both the subdivision and the
preservation of the house.
Commissioner Koepernik asked if the proposed
rehabilitation work would be in keeping with the original
house. Mr. Olsen discussed the repair and upgrading work
that needed to be done and said that it would all be
identical or compatible with the original house.
Commissioner Voester asked how close and what size the
other two residences would be. Mr. Zambetti pointed out
on the map the location and proposed size of the homes.
He noted that the 30 ft. easement was filled with mature,
dense vegetation and would serve as a natural buffer
between the homes.
Louise Cooper, resident of Saratoga, asked about the
height of the proposed homes and whether or not fences
would be allowed. Mr. Olsen replied that he did not want
to allow fences, except around a pool, wanting to keep the
open space feel of the property. He said he didn't want
to be limited to a one-story home, and that a two-story
home would not have an impact because of the topography
and vegetation.
Mr. Zambetti stated that the applicant eventually would
like to submit an application for heritage resource
designation of the property.
The Commission then summarized their comments on the
project, as follows:
Chair Held said it was important to protect both the
structure and the environment it sits in. He noted that
one incentive for designation was the ability to use the
State Historic Building Code, which may assist in the
rehabilitation of the structure.
Commissioner Cameron felt the proposal met the
preservation-related concerns in that the structure would
be retained. He felt the scenic easement was a crucial
2
Heritage Preservation Commission
Minutes - 1/20/88
part of the subdivision in protecting the environment
around the house.
Commissioner Tyrrell stated he would abstain from
commenting on the project, but questioned the applicant
about saving the shed buildings on the adjacent parcel and
about submitting an application for designation now. Mr.
Olsen replied that the adjacent parcel was not a part of
the proposal and that he would submit the application when
he had full ownership of the property.
Commissioner Voester concurred with Commissioner Cameron's
comments. She expressed concern about using similar,
natural materials in the rehabilitation work, and noted
the importance of preserving the environment of the site,
too.
Commissioner Koepernik dittoed other comments. He
expressed concern about not fencing in the open space
areas, and felt that the size of the surrounding
residences should be minimized to reduce their impact on
the adobe.
Commissioner Landsness reiterated other Commissioner's
comments and felt the scenic easement was an imaginative
and successful method to help preserve the house.
Commissioner Artshes abstained from commenting because she
arrived late to the meeting.
M/S Cameron/Koepernik to forward the Heritage Commission's
comments on the preservation-related issues for this
project to the Planning Commission, as follows:
1. The Heritage Commission believes the proposed
subdivision addresses preservation-related concerns
because the historic adobe structure will be preserved
on the site. The Commission supports the
rehabilitation of the adobe structure, and suggests
that similar and natural materials be used.
2. The Commission believes that preservation of the
mature vegetation and natural environment around the
house is just as important as preservation of the
house itself. The Commission believes the 30 ft.
scenic easement is a crucial part of the proposal in
that it protects the natural setting and provides a
buffer between the surrounding parcels. The
Commission suggests a very limited use of fences in
the scenic easement area.
3. The Commission acknowledges that the proposal does not
3
Heritage Preservation Commission
Minutes - 1/20/88
involve design review of the proposed adjacent
dwellings, but would like to suggest that those
residences be complimentary to the adobe, in terms of
size, height and style, when they are constructed.
They should not overwhelm or significantly impact the
integrity of the adobe and its natural surroundings.
4. The Commission encouraged the applicant to participate
in the heritage resource designation program, and
pursue the possibility of using the State Historic
Building Code to assist in the rehabilitation of the
adobe.
The motion passed on a 5-0-2 vote, Commissioners Ansnes
and Tyrrell abstaining.
III. Old Business
A. Suggestions for discussion topics for joint meeting with
City Council, 1/26/88.
The following topics were suggested:
1. Heritage Resource Inventory
a. Process for adoption, public notification.
b. How to incorporate inventory into planning
and building permit review process.
2. Communicating with City Council
3. Warner Hutton House - participate in relocation and
renovation process.
B. Set work priorities for FY88-89.
The Commission agreed on the following work priorities:
1. Complete Heritage Resource Inventory by April 1.
Develop process for and initiate updating of list.
2. Develop and adopt bylaws.
3. Increase public awareness, particularly in relation to
the inventory.
4. Continue heritage resource designation and bronze
plaque programs.
Heritage Preservation Commission
Minutes - 1/20/88
C. Heritage Resource Inventory
This item was continued to the next meeting.
IV. Items Initiated b_~ th9 Commission
Commissioner Voester had four items. She suggested that all
Commissioners be given a copy of a book called "Saratoga
Story". Chair Held mentioned that the Saratoga Historical
Foundation was pursuing a method of copying the publication.
In relation to the inventory, Commissioner Voester asked for
information on some reference materials, and thought an older
pink house on Montalvo Road should be considered for the
inventory. Commissioner Ansnes will do some research on this.
Commissioners Voester and Ansnes will continue working on a
newspaper article regarding the plaques and forthcoming
inventory.
V. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 5:10 p.m. The next regular
meeting will be held on Wednesday, February 3, 1988 at 3:00
p.m. V. Young reminded the Commission of the upcoming
workshop at DeAnza College on Friday, January 29.
Respectfully submitted,
Valerie Youn~l
Secretary to~ommission
5