Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-03-1965 City Council Minutes SAILSTOGA CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY OF MINUTES TI~: Wednesday, March 3, 1965 - 7:30 P. M. PLACE: City of Saratoga City Council Chambers, 13777 Fruitvale Ave,s Saratoga TYPE: Regular Meeting I ORGANIZATION PLayor Glennon called the meeting to order at 7:30 P. M~ A. ROLL CALL Present: Councilman Glennon, Drakes BurryJ Hartman, Tyler Absent: Noue B. MINUTES '7 It was moved by Councilman Bu~ry, secondedby Councilman Tyler, and carried unanimously to waive the reading of the minutes. of the meeting of February 1~, 1965 and approve them as mailed, II BIDS AND CONTRACTS A. REQUEST FOR POLICY DECISION ONePROPOSALS FOR. RELOCATION-OF THE MEMORIAL ARCH IN BLANEY PLAZA . biT. Henley reported that attempts to~obtain quotations for telcoating the memorial arch in Blaney Plaza resulted in only two proposals; one from Kelly Brothers to excavate around and under the arch, reinforce the structure with Steel underpinning, and move the entire arch to a loCatb n approved by the City Council. This proposal is estimated to cost approximately $4,000, The other firm, Peninsula Riggi~, proposed to brace the columns and arch and cut them loose from the base by Jack Men~ri~l hammer for moving at an estimated cost of $3750. Arch - Bla~ley Neither firmr Mr. Henley pointed out, could guarantee that the arch Plaza could be moved without damage and the possibility exists that the structure may have deteriorated to the degree that moving by any method would not be possible, In this event, the City would be obligated to pay for only that work which had actually been done on the project, The Staff recommendation, Fur, HanlegUontinued, would be to attempt the relocation by the method proposedb~ Kelly Brothers as the most feasible way of moving the arch intact. The Council and Staff discussed at length the alternatives of (1)' attempting to have the arch telcoated intact (2) restoring the hal arch if it is damaged inmovlng (3) replacing the original arch ' with a replica, using the original plaques; and (4) redosigning and ' building a new arch at some futu;e time. Recognizing the time element involved and the complicated factors involved the Council unanimously approved a motion presented by Councilman Drake and seconded by Council- man Burry that the City Administrator be authorized to have the arch moved if he can o~tain a satisfactory guarantee that it can either be moved intact or restored to its present condition at the new location for a maximum cost of $5j000. This resolution was adopted with the understanding that it is the first desire of the Council, within limitation of funds, for the arch to be moved completely intact; the second preference. is a partial moves restoring what can be preserved; the third is tO have a replica constructed, and the last is to keep the-plaques and construct a new mounting for them. Mr. Henley was directed to proceed with this matter as set forth above. B. REQUEST FOR POLICY DECISION ON CONTRACTING FOR MOVING OF PINE TREE Pine IN BLANEY PLAZA tree - Bl~ney' Councilman Hd~tmans Chairman of the Planning Committee,stated that Plaza after review and discussion with'-=Landscape Architect~ Mr. Rovianek, he had changed his original opinion that the Italian Stone Pine tree in Blaney Plaza should be mcved"to .the new. plaza. Councilman Hartman indicated that, aside from the]"probability that the chances of success- fully moving the tree are aboCt 50/50~ the Committee's recommendation - is based on the belief that moving the tree would not add to the aesthetic value of the Plaza and that the $2,000 cost Of ~ovtng it Pine could more effectively be used for o~h~r trees and plan~ss etc. tree - Under these circumstanqess it was moved by Councilman Hartmans seconded Blaney by Councilman Burry and unanimously carried that the Italian Stone Plaza .Pine trees which will have to be removed in connection with the Highway 9 construction projects be allowed to be removed. C. REQUEST FOR AUI~{ORIZATION TO RETAIN WALTER DOYLE FOR LAND ACQUISITION SERVICES ON SARATOGA-COX AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. W. Doyle- I~ was moved by. Eouncilm~ Drake, seconded by Councilman 1tartman, and Services unanimously ca~ied t6 aUthOrize th@ Mayor to. execute an agre~men~ for land as outlined by the City AdministratOrs with PiT. Walter Doyle for land acquisition - acquisition services on ~aka~oga-Co~ Avenue. i~provement Pro]ect, at Sara-Cox a cost.of $15. per hour up to a maximum of $i800s with the under~tandlr~g Ave. that if the job requires less than 120 hour~ then the City ~ill b~ billed solely on the basis of the time spent and that the Contractor will follow through with the project until the negotiations are dOm- pleted or eminent domain action is required. III ORDINANCES, PETITIONS, FORMAL RESOLUTIONS A. ORDINANCE NO. 38.4 - SARATOGA POST OFFICE ANGLE PARKING Ord. 38.4 Post In accordance with Staff gutdies which indicated that four parking Office spaces at a 45° angle from the curb line, as against three spaces An~le which can be achieved by parallel parking~ would create a traffic Parking safety hazard which would not Justify the gain of one extra parking space, it was moved by Councilman Drake to table Ordinance No. 38.4. Motion seconded by Councilman BUrry; carried end so ordered with b~yor Glennon abstaining from voting on the basis of his absence at the time of the public hearing on the pr6posed ordinance. B. ORDINANCE NO. 40 - REQUESTING INCLUSION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY IN THE SARATOGA FIRE DISTRICT . Ord. 40 It was moved by Councilman Hartman and seconded by Councilman Tyler Saratoga to adopt Ordinance No. 40, as introduced at the last meeting, being Fire an ordinance required as part of the procedure of including certain District portions of the City within the Saratoga Fire District. Motion Annexation carried with Mayor Glennon abstaining. C. ORDINANCE NS-3-ZC-27 - PAUL NASSON - C-81 It was moved by Councilman Burrys seconded by Councilman Drake and C-S1 carrieds with Mayor Glennon-abstaining~ to adopt Ordinance No. Paul Masson NS-3-ZC-27, as introduced at the last meeting. This ordinance Rezoning amends the Zoning Ordinance by rezoning from R-l-lOs000 (Single Ord. Family Residential) to "Conditional ~' (Conditional Industrial) the NS-3-ZC-27 9.5 acre parcel of land bounded on the north hy SararoSa Avenue, on the east hy McFarland Avenue and on the west by San Jose Water Works property and on the south by Tract 748. D. RESOLUTION NO. 222 - RE STATE SENATE REAPPORTIONMENT Res. 222 State Mr. Hanley stated that letters supporting the adoption of Resolution Senates No. 222 have been received from Mr. &Mrs. P. S. Herrington, Mrs. Reapportion- Ralph E. Woollays Dr. and ~s. John E,' Cox, Mrs. H. Arnold Mercers ment and Kathryn E, Walker. It was moved by Councilman Drakes seconded by Councilman Hartman and unanimously carried to adopt Resolution No. 222, as discussed at the last meeting, being a resolution requesting the Congress of the United States to submit a constitutional amend- ment permitting the retention of the Federal System of representation in State Senates. E. RESOLUTION NO. 223 Res. 223 Gas Tax Councilman Hartman moved~ seconded by Councilman Tyler to approve Const, Resolution'No. 223, adopting'the 1964-65 budget for the expenditure of Budget State Allocated Gas Tax Construction Funds. Motion carried 'unanimously. F. RESOLUTION NO. 224 Mr. Hanley explained that Resolutions 224'and 225 are required to ~es. 22~ amend the proce~dir~s chat heave bees previously undertaken for the Sara-Cox installatio.n of improvements for the Cox Avenue and Saratoga kvenue Ave. Storm Storm Drain Project to allow a sanitary line to be inclhded in the Drain & same project. He stated that the proposal has'been coordinated with Sewerage Sanitatiou District ~4 and will be part of the assessment district. Project It was moved by Councilman Drake, seconded by Councilmen hurry, and unanimously carried to adopt Resolution No. 224, determining to undertake proceedings regarding ~he Saratoga and Cox Avenue Storm Drain and Sanitary Sewerage Project. G. RESOLUTION NO. 22S Ees. 225 'Councilmen Hartman moved for the adoption of Resolution No. 225, Sara-Cox being a resolution mm~uding Resolution No. 211 of Intention to acquire Ave. Storm and construct improvements for Saratoga and Cox Avenue Storm Drain Drain & and Sanitary Sewerage Project. Motion seconded by Councilman hurry Sewerage and unanimously carried. Project IV SUBDIVISIONS AND BUILDING SITES A. SDR-490 - JOSEPH LONG. SDR-490 J. Long The City Administrator reported that all fees have been paid, bonds posted and conditions met for the building site application of Joseph Long for one lot on Saratoga Avenue. It was moved by Council- man Hartman, seconded by Councilman hurry and unanimously carried to adopt Resolution No. SDR-490-1, 'granting building site approval on the applicat~on SDR-490. B. SD-527 - MAXMAR INVESTMENT CORPORATION SD-527 Mr. Hanley read the Subdivision Committee report dated February 23, Maxmar 1965 outlining the joint meeting of the Planning Committee of the Investment City CounCil and the Subdivision Committee of the Planning Commission Corporation relative to flood ~ontrol requirements for dedication and improvement flood in connection with planned community development for ~xmar Investment control Corporation (SD-527). This report was adopied by the Planning Com- requirements mission at the meeting on February 23, 1965 and transmitted to the City Council as the recommendation of the COmmission. As fully set forth in the February 23 report, th~ Planning Conission recommends that Alternate Flood Control Plan No. 4 be adopted and adhered to in the development of the M~ar Planned Community,' that the developer obtain prior approval in each case from the Flood .Control District before proceeding with construction, particularly within the ten foot fill requirement area, and that the concrete for the creek retaining walls becolored green for aesthetic purposes and a wall ground cover be planted to expedite natural vegetation coverage of the walls. It was moved by Councilman Drake, seconded by Councilman Hartman, and unanimously carried to adopt the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission. C. SD-527 - RAy JO~S - RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING C0~ISSION RE MODI- FICATION OF CONDITIONS SD-527 Ray Jones The City Administrator read the report of the Subdivision Committee Request dated February 23, 1965, which was adopted as the recommendation of for the Planning Commission at its meeting of the same date. The report modification outlines the Commission's recommendations relative to Mr. Jones letter of conditions of 3anuary 7, 1965 protesting Conditions 5, 14, 15 and 22 of the condi- tions of tentative approval established by the Planning Commission on December 28, 1964. Briefly the report recommends that Conditions 22 and 14 remain as originally p~oposed and that 15 and 5 be modified as fully set forth in the r~port. Mr. Ray Jones expressed satisfaction with the Commi~sion's recommenda- tions with the exception of Condition #14 requiring backfill of the washout on the rear of Lots 24 and 25 and extension of the existing culvert. Mr, Jones agreed that the washout on the quarry road does constitute a safety hazard but that the responsibility for repairing the area lies,with other parties who were previously required, by Court orders agreements and Council action in granting a Use Permit fur the Co~ciardi Quarry~ to bring this road up to standard. Jones pointed out that no lots in his proposed subdivision will have access to this road and read the resume of this matter which was attached as Exhibit "(b) Condition 14" to his letter of protest of January 7~ said resume being a part of the SD-537 file. Mr. Faber L, Johnston~ Jr., City Attorney, advised the Council that he has an interest in this subdivision and, as City Attorney, outlined the history of the past and present status of this road. He also verified that although the o%mers of the 31 acre subdivision site are the owners in fee of the greater 'part of the easement they have no right-of-way to use the road. The Council and Staff discussed this matter at length with Mr. Jones and Planning Commission Chairman Norton. Chairman Norton advised that the Planning Commission had found this to be a difficult and complicated matter but based on Section 2.4-2(B), Part T~o of Ordinance NS-5s which ,requires considera- tion of any matters concerning safety on approved sites, the Commission felt that it must impose this condition on P~. Jones in order to correct an unsafe condition. After discussing the cOmplexities involved in this matter relative to responsibility for repair and maintenance to the road and culvert, possibility of city liability,.and the possible alternative methods of correcting the safety hazards the Mayor, with council approval, referred the matter to the Public Welfare Cormittee for study and recommendation at the .next meeting and authorized the'City Administra- tor to consult an independent attorney to review and report to the Council regarding the legal aspects of the matter. Recess: 9:55 P. M.. Reconvened: 10:10 P. M. V PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ORDINANCE NS-3o9~- A~NDING DEFINITION OF "SITE AREA" Ord. NS-3,9 Mr. Henley read Ordinance NS-3.9, as recommended by the Planning Site Area Commission~ amending the Zoning Ordinance by changing the definition of site area to provide that in R-1-20,000 and R-1-40~000 zones flood control easements can be included in the minumum lot size area. He pointed out that this would apply only to the larger lots where the placement of houses would not interfere with flood control easements and that the requirement that such easements be excluded from site area'in higher density zoning districts would not be affected. With no objection, Mayor Glennon declared the public hearing opened at 10:15 P, M. and directed that the entire file be included as evidence. There being no one present who wished to comment for or against the proposed amendment, the public hearing was closed and Mayor Glennon directed the record to indicate that Ordinance NS-3.9 was introduced as read. VI ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS A. MAYOR Mayor Glennon reported that he and Mr. Henley had attendeda meeting of the Board of Supervisors at which time they x~ere considering contract County fees. The Mayor indicated that the City's primary interest was in the Contract proposed 50% increase in contractual Sheriff's Department fees and Fees - that they had asked only to have the opportunity to examine the Sheriff's cost figures to determine and understand tile basis for the.fee structure. Dept. COuncilman Burry reported that he and Mr. Henley had subsequently artended another meeting with County representatives and had re- ceived a summary of the breakdown of County costs incurredin furnishing patrol division services to contract cities. Council discussed this summary which recommends a charge of $9,86 per patrol car hour based en estimated and actual patrol car operation costs, exclusive of general County overhead expenses. He further reported that the only remaining question was. ene of Board policy as to whether the County would continue to charge only 80% of direct operating cost or would adopt a policy of charging 100% of cost and that weuld be deuided by the Board at its meeting of March 8s 1965. . B. FINANCES Bills It was moved by Councilman Drake, seconded by Councilman Hartman and unanimously carried to approve the disbursements on the list dated March 3, 1965 far a total amount of $21,528.61 and authorize that w'arrants be dra~nx in payment. C. COUNCIL COI~vlITTEES (i) Councilman Drake reported that the Management Committee met C-74 & Tuesday, March 2, 1965 and considered FAr. Frank Bonnet's request for SD-516 return of the $150. fee o~ rezonin~ application C-74 and $185. filing Request fee for subdivision SD-516, The work for which the subdivision fee for refund was. paid has been performed by the Staff and t|~ Committee therefore of filing recommends that there he no refund of any portion of the filing fee fees - on SD-516. With regard to the rezoning application fee it is the F. Bonnet judgment of the Committee that the City h~s incurred approximately $50° in Costs including publication.of notice of public hearing before the Planning Commission and the Committee therefore recommends a refund of $100. of the fil~ng fee for C-74. I~ W~s moved by Councilman Brake, seCOnded by Councilman Ha~tman and unanimously carried to accept the Management committee repq~ and authorize ~he refund of $100. to Mr. Frank Bonnet As indicated~ (2) Councilman' Drake reported that th~ Management Co-~{ttee reviewed Council a request from Pastor Amundson of Immanuel Lutheran Church for.use of Chamber the Council Chambers for Church services until their own facilities use by are completed, and that it is the recommendation of the Committee that Church the Church be allowed to use the Chamber for Sunday services for a Groups - period not to exceed two months, this being considered a reasonable Immanuel time limit to meet the emergency needs of a Church group until it has Lutheran an opportunity to obtain other temporary quarters. The Committee Church recommends that occasional useby Church groups be authorized as a matter of policy by the Council as being in line with the original intent of the Council policy on use of the Council Chambers. The Management Committee report was unanimously adopted on a motion made by Council- man Drake and seconded by Councilman Burry. intra-State (3) With regard to the proposed tax on Intra-State gross receipts of Gross Telephonetelephone companies, Councilman Drake reported that the Management receipts tax Committee recommends that the City not take a formal position in support of or in opposition to this propesal. With no objection, the Mayor so ordered. (4) Councilman Burry, Chairman of the Public Welfare Committee, report- Argonaut- ed that the Committee reviewed the continuing study of pedestrian safety Foothill- at Argonaut and Foothill schools, particularly cost data for sidewalk Pedestrian construction and had directed the Staff to contact Mr. Ungaro concerning Study possible approaches to financing the work. (5) Public Welfare Committee Chairman Burry reported that a report, prepared by the Director of Public Works, dated February 2, 1965, con~ raining six possible solutions to the problem of storm drainage and Komina Ave. drainage of the spring on Xomina'Avenue had been reviewed with resi- Drainage dents of the area and that the residents who were present indicated interest in a possible assessment district to construct full improvements on Oak Street, Sixth .Street, Third Street, Lomita Avenue, Komina Avenue and Aloha Avenue under the city's two to one Gas Tax Matching program. This possibility will be further explored by the Staff and the residents of the area and in the meantime a French Drain will be installed to provide a temporary solution to the problem of the spring at a cost of no more than $~00. (6) Councilman Burry reported that the Public Welfare Committee, after review of the request from the Saratoga-Los Gatos Recreat~n District Beginners for a contribution by the City of $7,000 to cover the cost of a Lean~ing beginners learning pool at Saratoga High School, recommends that the Pool - Council authorize payment by the City of up to $7,000 to the Recreation Sara. High District for this project when the pool construction is undertaken - School - with the understanding that the work will be done within six months. -5- Councilman Burry indicated that the Comraittee concluded that this kind of project represents aa excellent joint venture particularly since the Chairman of the District indicated that under this approach the District can make all the pools at Saratoga High School available to all children cf Saratoga on the same basis regardless of residence in the Recreation District. Mr. Gene Goldberg, representing the Rec- reation District, spoke in support of the Committee's recommendation and it was moved by Councilman Burry~ seconded by Councilman Hartman, and unanimously carried to adopt the Committee's report and authorize General Fund expenditure not to exceed $7,000 for the project as out-lined. (7) Councilmaq Hartman, Chairman of the Flanning Committee, reported Blaney that after reviewing proposals received for landscaping design servicc~ Plaza for the realignment of Blaney Plaza, it is the Comm~ttee's recommenda- Landscaping tlon that Mr. Gil Rovianek be retained to prepare designs at a fee of Design 10% of the cost of the project - not to exceed a maximum of $3500. was moved by Councilman tlartman, seconded by Councilman BUrry, and unanimously carried to authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement for Landscaping Design services as outlined, (8) Councilman Hartman stated that the Planning Committee had reviewed proposals for landscaping the center strip of the divided G. Martin - four-lane section of Saratoga Avenue from Kosich Drive to Fruitvale ~aratoga Ave, Avenue and recommends that Mr. George Martin be retained to prepare a Center landscaping plan for the treatment of this center strip at a cost Strip of $900.00. It was moved by Councilman Hartman, seconded by Council- Landscaping man Burry and unanimously carried to adopt the February 19, 1965 report of the Committee and authorize the City Administrator to retain Mr. George Martin at the recommended fee of $900,00. (9) Councilman Hartman gave a progress report from the Planning Committee regarding the Youth Center representatives inquiry as to the feelings of the City relative to a proposal that the Youth Center Youth grant its property on Fourth Street to the City in exchange for t~e Center City~s construction of a new structure at the Civic Center Site, It Fourth was the recommendation of the Planning Committee to the Youth Center Street representatives that they first determine if they would be legally Property subject to the capital gains tax on the sale of the Youth Center pro- perty and secondly to obtain some professional advice as to whether or not their Fourth Street property would lend itself to park and recreation development before seeking any change in the project already agreed upon by the council, (10) The Planning Committee, Councilman Hartman reported, reviewed a variety of possibilities regarding the treatment of subdivision Subdivision design and fencing along major thoroughfares and directed the Staff to Design prepare a rough draft of an amendment to the Zoning CMinance for &..Fencing further consideration at a meeting scheduled for March 8, said ; study meeting to be conducted in conjunction with Commissioners Crisp ;'-. and Cowlay. (11) Councilman Hartman reported that the Planning Committee reviewed Tree the budget and program for tree trimming and spraying and directed the Trimming Staff to contact Pied Piper Tree Surgery to work out an agreement for Program trimming and spraying services for this fiscal year to be submitted to the City Council for its approval, (12) Councilman Hartman, Chairman of the Golf Course Committee, submitted a progress report, dated February 26, 1965 relative to recent Golf meetings held by the Committee to analyze and study alternative methods Course of golf course development in Saratoga. He stated that the Committee Development has analyzed the financial aspects of outright municipal purchase and operation, joint development by the City in cooperation with private developers and straight private development and that the Committee has tentatively concluded that there are feasible approaches to encouragement of private development in connection With a residential subdivision that are consistent with Saratoga's General Plan and over- all policy. The Committee, Co~ncilmen Hartman continued, will further · explore this possibility and will report to the Planning Commission and the City Council as soon as any specific proposals materialize. Trafficways (13) Councilman Ty~ =' asked if there was any objection to the Recommendation recommendations fret,, :ne Trafficways Committee to the State Division re Highways of Highways relating to highways in Saratoga as set out in the Com- mittee's' report of February 18, 1965. There being none, Councilmen Tyler stated that he would represent the Council's position to the Committee. D. DEPARTMENT HEADS AND OFFICERS Extension (1) Planning Director Stanley Walker reported that Mr. Lodato has of time requested an extension of two years time for the use of the building for use on the property in the P-A zone adjacent to the medical center develop- of building ment on Blauer Drive. He outlined the background of the limited use in P-A placed upon this building and stated that the State Division of High- Zone - ways wishes to use the building as operational quarters for three men Lodato- while the Highway 9 improvement project is in progress, Mr. Shelley Blauer Williams spoke on behalf of this request and stated that the applicant Drive had originally requested and been granted use of the building for three years at which time he intended to replace it with an extension of the medical center hut that the demand for expansion has not materialized. It was moved by Councilmen Drake, seconded by Councilman Tyler, and unanimously carried to authorize amendment to the agreement and exten- sion of the bond until such time as the highway project has been com- pleted or until February 28, 1966~ whichever is sooner~ subject to the Bonding Company's written agreement to this extension. Gas Station (2) Planning Director Walker reported that the application of Mr. Johnson & Devitt for a gas station at the corner of Johnson and Prospect Avenues Prospect had been turned down by the County Planning Commission. Res. 36-B-56 (3) Upon the recommendation of the Director of Public Works, it Tr. 2804 was moved by Councilman Hartman, seconded by Councilmen Burrys and unanimously carried to adopt Resolution No. 36-B-56, accepting the streets in Tract 2804 and releasing the improvement bond. (4) The Director of Public Works presented a proposed agreement from Monte Sereno the City of Monte Sereno whereby funds expanded on the Twin Creeks Agreement Road Bridge located within the City limits of Saratoga and required re matching by the City of Monte Sereno in connection with the development of funds for Tract 3814 shall apply as Monte Sereno matching credit for local Twin Creeks matching funds and that Saratoga shall receive no credit for any of Bridge these funds. At the same time the agreement provides that Monte Sereno agrees to grant to Saratoga reciprocal matching credit on a future Joint Select System Project equal to the amount of credit accruing to Monte Sereno. It was moved by Councilman Burry, seconded by Councilmen Tyler, and unanimously carried to authorize the Mayor to execute the contract as outlined. (5) The Director of Public Works presented a request from the Pacific PUg wire Gas and Electric Company for a wire easement for providing electric easement and telephone service to the Medical Village subdivision at Cox and for Medical Saratoga Avenues. Mr. Huff explained that a portion of the area needed Village for the public utilities easement is on property owned by the City and after discussion~ it was moved by Councilman Burry~ seconded by Council- men Tyler, and unanimously carried to authorize the Mayor to execute the grant of easement, subject to the approval of the City Attorney. VII COMMUNICATIONS A. WRITTEN Fluoridation (1) Council acknowledged a letter from Mr. Willtam F. Haack, dated February 23, 1965, advocating the Council's objection to proposals for fluoridation within the City. Arch & (2) Letters were received from Bill Krause and Mrs. Laura J. L. Mueller Plaza favorin~ preservation of the Memorial Arch and of Blaney Plaza as it Preservation now exists. Arch (3) Council received copies of a letter from Fred and Emily Beettier, Preservation members of the Saratoga Historical Foundation, requesting the City Council to cooperate toward the preservation of the Memorial Arch in the re-designed plaza. B. ORAL (1) The Director of Public Works requested release of the monument bond for Tract 3476~ and it was moved by Councilman Drake, seconded by Councilman Hartman and carried unanimously tO release the bond as recommended. (2) Mayor Glennon expressed appreciation to Planning Commission Chairman Norton for his attendance at the meeting and to the representa- tives of the Good Government Group for serving coffee. VIII ADJOURigMENT It was moved by Councilman Burry~ seconded by Councilman Hartman and unanimously car=ied to adjourn the meeting at 11:50 P. M. Respectfully submitted, //, / i iu.r. c. LzY, / -8-