HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-06-1968 City Council Minutes SARATOGA CITY' COUNCIL
SUi, t}Ia, RY OF HINUTES
T1}rE: ldednesday, ~iarch 6, 1968 7:30 P~
PLACE: Saratoga City Council Chmnbers, 13777 Fruitvale Ave,', Saratoga, Calif,.
~PE~ Regular Meeting
I ORGAI~IZATION : =
~.iayor Glennon called the meeting to order at 7:30 P. Y.I. and ~elcomed the
Civics students of Miss ~c~ey's Sarat~a l{fgh School Civics classes~ He called
St~ents attention to the bsck~ro~d agerids fnfomatl~ which had been prepared for
their aid in foll~fn~ the course of business and ~no~ced that it fs the
policy of the Council to pemit interruption of tha procedure by S~dents
{~ho wish clarification of an item ~der dfs~ssfon.
A. ROLL ~L
:
Roll Call Present: Councilmen Glenn~, liar,an, Tyler, Bu~y, ~obbfns
Absent: None
HinuCes It ~as moved by Co~cflman Robbins, seconded by C~cf~ BUrr~ ~d
~antmously carried to dispense x~!th the readinS of the FebrUary
1968 minutes ~d approve them as ~itten.
BIDS a CONTACTS
' ~e Clerk ~nounced that he ham received, after the agenda had b~en
~re~nt prepared, s proposed resolution and contract for the relinquis~nt of
with. County a portion of Fruitvale Avenu~ tO the Co~ty in order to qualify for
for relin- expe~fture of ~89,700. of non~expreas~,ay funds for Fruitvale Av~due
qufs~ent improvement. The portion to bd relinquished, Hr. HUff stated, cobsfatS
o{ portion of 1150' of Fruitale Avenue rUnping southerly fro~ its fntersecti~
o{ ~fc? with Saratoga~Avenue. Nr. Huff explained that the relfnqufs~nt..fs a
vale Ave. technf~ality required by the tems of the expressx~ay bond issue an~ that',
upon c~pletfon of the construckle, the County ~-7tll relinquish
street back. to the City. ~.lith '~o objection, l{ayor Glennon deferied acti~
~. this item ~tl later ~ the agenda so that the.:Cfty Attomey ~OUld
review .the ~roposed resolution ~d agreecut for reXinquis~nt,
III PETITIONS, O~IN~S a FOCAL ~SOL~IONS
A& ODIN~E NS-3-ZC-41
Ord. ~r. Huff stated that this ordinate vms reintroduced at the last meet-
NS-3-ZC-41 i~, ~ridh a revision to Condition 6, as requested by the applfc~t, to
Franklin provide that construction begin within 10 months of the tf~ of Co~cfl
Homes approval instead of within six nonths as originally required. · It
~zonfng moved by Councilman Bur~ and seconded by Co~cilman l{~mn to adopt
Ordinance NS-3-ZC-41, c~ditiOnally rezonfng property at F~rth Street,
Sprinter Avenue ~d Saratoga Creeks fr~ R-~-400~X to R-~-3000.
Co~cilm~ Robbins c~ented that, although the z~in~ ch~e requested
was a relatively minor one, ft did increase the n~ber of aparments
which could be constructed per acre, ~vith comensurate increase in
traffic, population, and se~ices ~qufred. -lie expressed c~cem that
pemittfng ~ increase fn density ~ould establish an ~desfrable
precedent. lle said that he could not agree with the Plsnnin~ C~ission
that the zone ch~ge ~ould result in ~he c~structfon of better quality
aparments ~d' that, on the basis of the points he had raised, he could
not appro~ t~ requested reclassf{fcatf~.
Mayor Glennon expressed approval of Councilman Robbins reasons for
opposing the change and stated that although he felt that he ~uld
approve the ordinance he did so ~fth s~e degree of rese~ation. Noting
that developers ~d.managed, fn the ,~st, 'to circ~ent the C~ncfl's
Str~IARY OF COUNCIL HINUTES - r4arch 6, 1968
intent, he stated that he would not approve similar applications Unless
and until the Franklin Homes develovment proved desirable. At this
Ord. time, however, he stated that he is willing to approve some degree of
NS-3-ZC-41 experimentation.
Franklin
Homes Councilman Burry asked ~ny objections had' not been raised at the
Rezontng public hearing and ~!ayor Glennon taplied thee there was no reason ~hy
a person should voice an o~inion as to ho~ he plans to vote until the
time of the vote.
Councilman Tyler said that he ~-~as not convinced that density would
actually be increased because a smaller number of apartments might
result in larger sized units ~hich would house more people then a
greater number of smaller units,
Councilman Herman called for the question and Ordinance NS-3-ZC-41 was
adopted on the Aye votes of Councilman Glennon, Tyler, .~artman
Burry, with Councilman Robbins dissenting.
B. I~EST VALLEY JUNIOR COLLE~"~ - SARATOC, A CANPUS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
(1) RESOLtrrlON NO, 411 -
Res. 411
%I.V.J.C. Mr. fluff stated that Resolution No. 411 authorizes execution of
~reement an agreement whereby the City agrees to install sanitary sexier
with / mains in the process of the construction of' Fruitvale Avenue
Cupertino improvements~ The agreement was app~Oved by the bending attotmeys
Sanitary and provides that if, for some reason, the district does not go
District through, then the contract would be void, It ~as moved by Council-
lor mains man Har~man, seconded by Councilman Tyler, and carried unanimously
to adopt R~solution
C. RESOLUTION 412
Requesting
Regis trar~s It ~as. moved by Councilman Tyler, seconded by CoUnciiman -~rtman, and
Services carried unanimousl~ to adopt ~esolution ~i2, requesting Services of
Re,. 412 the Coixnty Registra~*s office for the 1968 General }iunicipai Election.
D, APPROVAL OF ELECTION OFFICERS AND DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES FOR TIlE
APRIL 9, 1968 GENEi~AL MI~.IICIPAL ~LECTiON
Approval Hr;' Euif explained.~hiit 10 ~recinetshave been established f~r the
of Election .....
e , t , 1 t f ic a i0,650
Polling registered voters t~ Serve within the precincts i.zhere they reside~
places It :was moved by Cou~cilm~it Burry; seaonded by C~anci'lman RObbifis,
a~d carried unanimoUSly td approve the! list of election officers and
poiiing ~laces for the 1968 General MUhictpal Eleatton~
PETITION REQUESTING STUDY P~E/D!TICIPATED I.IEST VALLEY JU}IIOR COLLEGE
CAllPUS TRA}'FIC - ALLENDALE-FRUITVALE AREA.
Mr. fluff reported that a petition has been received, si~ned by
Petition approximately 150 persons~ including one sheet submitted at this
for Allen-
meeting, requesting a thorough traffic study of the impact of
dale Ave. increased traffic on Allendale Avenue anticipated as a result of the
Traffic Junior College cunstr/~ction. lie called attention to excerots from
Study the 1965 l~ilbur Smith Traffic Study pertinent to this matter which
was furnished for Council information.
~/ith no objection, ~layor Glennon referred the petition to the Public
l~elfare Cou~lttee and asked that they review the request in the light
of the studies that have been made and re~ort their recommendations
back to the Council,
SL%ff4ARY OF COUNCIL HINUTES - March 6, 1968
F, RESOLUTION NO. 36-B-96
Res.
36--B-96 Upon the recommendation of the Director of Public v~orkss it x.~as
Tr. 4091 moved by Councilman Tylers seconded by Councilman ~obbinss and
Acceptance carried unanimously to adopt Resolution No, 36-B-96, acceptin~ the
& Bond streets in Tract 4091 and releasing the improvement bond no,ted to
Kelease guarantee improvement,
IV SUBDIVISIONS, BUILDING SITES AND ZONING REf~EST
SDR-619 A. SDR-619 - THOMAS B. FRYER
Fryer
Final The City Clerk reported that all conditions of tentative building.
Site site approval had been met for the second of Hr, Fryer*s two parcels
approval on Saratoga Hills Road and it was moved by Councilman Hartman, seconded
by Councilman Tyler, and unanimously carried to adopt Resolution
No. 619-2s granting final site approval for Parcel B. }It. Hu,ff
noted chat Mr. Fryer*s lots were located at the foot of Saratoga
Hills Road near Reid Lane and Pontiac Drive and therefore required
no reimbursement agreement for participation in other improvements.
to Saratoga Hills Road,
V PUBLIC HEARINGS
, None
VI ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
A. ~L~YOR
(1) ~iayor Glennon announced that the Inter~City Council would meet
I.C.C. on V~irch 7 at Plateau 7 in San JOse and that the regularly
Mtg. scheduled meeting Would be preceded By a 3{30 P. M~ Civil Defense
program.
(2) Mayor Glennon announced thats due to the resignation of. Eugene
p.D.Lively O'Rorke from the Planning Commission to accept a DOSiriSh in
appointed L~ 3~llas h~ ~Shed to submit a nominee ~o fi11 t~ unex~ired
to unexpired term Of Mr. 0~Rorke. Tl~e Mavo~ then p~c~osed the nomina~i~n
Planning ~.. of Mr. Phlll~ D; Liveiy and' stated that Mr. Lively is employed
Cu~ission as Manufacturing ~{anager of the Ordnance Division of ?MC Corpora-
term of tiun~ has resided with his family at 14710 Sobey Road since 1961
E~ O'Rorke and has a B. S. in En~ineering from Stanford University. It was
moved by Councilman Hartman, seconded by Councilman Hobbins, and
carried unanimously to appoint }it. Lively to the unexpired term
of Planning Commissioner Eugene O'Rorke. The Mayor introduced
Mr. Lively to those present and administered the oath of office.
B. FINANCE
(1) The Council reviewed the list of disbursements and Councilman
Copenhaver Herman ~uestioned the progress of Copenhaver Construction Comvany
Construction on the Village Parking District improvements. It was reported
Co.- progress that the engineer of work has certified that a little over 50Z
of Village of the work has been completed and Mr. Huff stated that since the
Parking contract completion date of January 15~ 1968, the contractor has
DisC.#1 been incurring a $50. per diem penalty. At this times it was
reported, the 10~ retention of payment due adee. uately covers the
penalties incurred. However, the Director of Public X.brks and
~Clty Administrator advised that care will be taken to insure that
penalty charges.will continue to be covered. Mr. Huff stated
that no extension has been requested and that no reason has been
given for the contractors, failure to complete the project on
time. Councilmam Hartman expressed strong criticism of the
.~aontractor's non-performance and suggested that the $50. per day
penalty was apparently not sufficient to cause diligent efforts
on the part of the contractor. Under the circt~nstances Councllr~an
· Hartman expressed his feeling that such contractors should be
permanently dropped fram the city*s bid lists, and that positive
steps be taken to avoid this type of problem in the future.
-3-
~UI~qARY 0F COUNCIL ltINU~g - ?qarch 6s 1968
~[ayor 61ennon stated that although he agreed that in awarding
a bid, records of past performance must be taken into considera-
tion, as well as the bid prices he did not kn~.y what additional
legal steps could be taken to guarantee ;ood performance other
than those already employed by the city.
The Council and staff discussed the problem and the work which
was dune to provide Christmas shopper perking which removed some
of the urgency from the cityts consideratiun of calling the
bund at that time, It vas agreed tiltit the pro.~ect will be
watched carefully and every effort ~ade .to get the Job completed
as soun as possible,
..i
Approval of It was moved by Councilman Burry, secgnded by Counelhan Robbins,
Bills and carried unanimously to approve the disbursements un the list
.dated tfarch 6, 1968 and authorize that warrants be drmm in pay-
ment for a total amount of $30,834,43.
Quarterly (2) The Council received copies of a revised quarterly budget report
Budget Report for reviev,
C, COUNCIL CO~t~TTEES AND REPORTS
(1) Hr, Huff announced that the Planning C~ission adopted a resolu-
tion reco~mending the adoption of the Proposed Saratoga Ce~eral
Plan, 1968, subject to modifications. contained in the report
General accompanying the Planning Counissiun Resolution, It was moved
Plan by Councilman Harman, seconded by Cotincilman Robb~ins, and
1968 carried unanimously to direct!the City Clerk to set the public
hearingon.p~oposed revision to the C~neral Plan for 8:00 P, Ho
un April 3,:, t968. The ~iayor asked that aa~h Councilman study the
connnents from the Planning Coauntssion prior tO that time,
(2) CouncilmaniT~l~r reported that the Public l~elfare Co~ittee met
to consider the Planning Co~ission reCanmendatiun that the
request' from: l~estbroOk resi~nts for Co~uencement of '~nnexatian
~/estbr0ok proceedings ~e approved, C,o~ncilman Tyler stated that the
Annexation Committee Was inclined to act favorably on this request orovided
Prospect R~a.d and bridge imprbvemants could be completed at no
added 'CoSt !to the City. The Committees he contiuued~ feels
strongl~ that the ai~tzens Of~ the area would be an asset to
the city; Howeverl in vie~ bf a staff estimate: that' it would
cost approximately $210~000 ~o improve the road, and the past
Council pblicy of denying requests far annexation involving
major imprOVement, .Councilmah'Tyler s~id that the Committee
could not ~e~ommend ennexatia~ at this time. Councilman Tyler
read portions of a letter fro:m ~4r. 0skar Thuruhers P~esident!
of the BrOok~iew Hdm~o~ers -Improvement Association,, in which
the residents ptop0S~ds as ah aiternate ~b denial, t~at formal
annexatiOti p~oceedings be postponed udtil videoinS of this
portinn of Ptospec~ Road bY the county~ - It was reported th~'t
County representatives indicated that ~h~ County mould undertake
to improve the road in the near future if the City of Saratoga
and City of San Jose cooperate, In view of the unknown time
period !nvolveds the Public l~elfare Co~mnit~ee reconnended that
~he request for annexation be denied, x:ithout vreJudice, and
.. Considered by the Council at such time that the road and bridge
have been improved. Councilman Tyler emphasized that if the
Counnittee could be assured. that lmnrovement would be achieved
within a limited time period, it ~ould recommend approval but
that it did not fe~.! that future Councils should be com~itted
on the basis of unknown 'time factors, Tb~ Co~lttee also
recommended that the area be included as a part of the General
SUNI4ARY OF COUNCIL M1}RVfES - }{arch 6, 1968
Councilman Robbins questioned whether,or not some more positive
action might be taken at this time ~ithout binding future couneiiT.
W~stbrook ¢ouncilman Tyler moved, seconded by Councilman Burry to accent
Annexation the Public ~elfare Committee report and deny the request for
annex'atlo~ at this time, without prejudice, and to approve the
request at the time Prospect Road ~nd the bridge are improved,
~ir, OskariThurnher asked if th~ C~uncil would consider tabling the
matter anti1 the road improvements are completed insmad of deny-
ing the request,
I.layor Gle~non suggested that the Council r~cess briefly to allow
the students to leave at the scheduled 9 P, ~ and to allo~
IJestbrookresidents/to caucus, There being no objection, ~ayor
Glennon asked whether any students wished to ask further questions
relative to any of the items under discussion and, after brief
clarification of i~sues discussed, thanked the students and
Mi~. McGovney for their interest and declared a recess at 8:58.
Council reconvened at 9:15 P, ?L and Mr, Thuraher expressed
appreciation to th~ PUbliC l~elfare Committee and the suggested
vote of cdnfidence expressed by the Council but reveated his
request for a'continuance instead of denial, without prejudice,
Councilman Robbins suggested that no action be ~aken at this
time and. Counetimim Tyle~ withdrew his previously stated motion
to deny, WithoutpreJddiCe at this time,
C o unci 1 n~n- B u r r y ..' withdrew his ~$~cond and it
then mov~ by Councilman. Tyler, seconded by Councilman Burry,
and carried unanimously'~o accept the Conmittee report aS reworded
to state ~that the CouOcli takes no action on the request for
annexation at this time~
(3) cotmcilm~n'Ty~le~ repor~ that.. the ~ii~ l~elfare Connittee
Res. 385-1 re~e~ed'~he"Cdpertino Sanitary Dist~ictss objectionS.to .the
Amending 'laSt paragraph;on Page 2.of ReSolu~ibn No. 385~ rela~ing to
Res. 385 rel0cation of~Utilitiesand ~ecomnenas deletiOn Of the paragraph.
te sanitary in.quest~oa,!..T~a Gity;Attoro~y apDroved dele~{on of .~his
district patagran~ whiC~ ~e e~piained co~stttbteS agreement b~ the
service Sanitary' biS~r~ct tO ~0~ ly ]~"~h t~e pr0vision~ Of section ,,
13~19.1 ~f the:.Saratoga~ity ~ode ~S to installa~ionS ~.,ithin
theCorp0~ate ~i~its of ~he ~l~y. It was moved~ by CO~cilma~
I~.artman~ secOnded by Cot£neil~an ,Tyler, and carried unanimouSl~
tO adop~ Regolution No~ 3~5-1~ deie~in~ the vatagfa~h set forth
i~ the ~bmmitte~ r~por~ and i~ ~goi~t~on 385, ~s a~pted.
lns~ (~) C6Uncilman ~U~f~rep0rt~d th~ ehe ~an~em~nt ~ommittee had
program discusSan inS~rance prOgramS for the City but is no~ prepared
tO submit e final reV6~t and ~ecommendltion a~ this time;
(5) Coancilman Burry reported that he had artended the most recent
ABAG'meeting, as the cityss official r~presentatives and he
ABAG related to the Council the items discussed and action taken,
~leeting Discussion of the budget ~as deferred to the ~ay 10 meeting,
Report he stateds and the major topic of discussion concerned the
recent ombezzlement of agency funds, Action reported in this~
respect included a re-audit of a~ency accounts and emplolnnent of
"hltorney to determine whether or not any other agency was partially
,~'to~blame, Councilman Burry stated that although several speakers
expressed strona"reaction to theExecutlve Counittee's 'reluctance
to assume'any ltabllitys the C~u~ittee members felt that they
should wait until all the investigative processes are completed
before submitting an opinion as to responsibility,
-5-
S~i}{ARY OF COUNCIL MINUTES - March 6, 1968
Councilman Burry stated that, on behalf of Saratoga, he had
voted to support a sug~estion that the investlgative committee
ABAG be comprised of persons uho are not currently members of the
Executive Committee but that the motion failed.
Councilman Burry concluded his remarks by reporting that the
regularly scheduled election of officers was held and ]!r. Kinney,
Supervisor from Alameda County was elected to succe~ President
~Iiller of San Jose,
D, DEPART~IENT IIEADS AND OFFICERS
(1) The Director of Public I~rks reported that improvements had
SDR-725 been satisfactorily completed in connection with SD~-725 and it
Bond was moved by Councilman Burry, seconded by Councilman Robbins~
release and carried unanimously to refund the cash bond posted to
guarantee improvements.
(2) Mr. Sbok reported that all deficiencies had been corected at
Tr. 2965 the end of the one=year maintenance period by the developer
Acceptance & of Tract 2965 and it was moved by Councilman Hartman, seconded
Bond Release by Councilman Tyler, and carried unanimously to adopt Resolution
Res.36-B-97 No. 36-B-97~ accepting the improvements and releasing the bond
posted therefor,
(3) Upon the report from the DirectOr of Public Works that all
Res.36-B-98 deficiencies had been Satisfactorily corrected at the end of
Accepting the one year maintenance period~ it was moved by Councilman
Streets & Robbins~ seconded by Councitma~ Tyler~ and carried unanimously
Releasing bond to adopt Resolution Mo. 36-B-98, acce~ting t~e streets and
Tr. 4062 releasing the improvement bond posted to guarantee improvements
in Tract 4062.
(4) ~4r~ Shook~reported construction complete on T~act 3591 and
Tr. 3591 recommended construction acceptance. 0~ motion of Councilman
Construction Hartman, seconded by CouncilmanBurry the Council unanimously
Acceptance accepted improvements in Tract 3591 for construction only,
- ]
(5) The Director of Public Works reported that at the last meeting
Refuse of the Municipal Public Works officials the problem of refuse
Disposal disposal was discussed and that members had been requested to
Study poll their Councils to determine whether or not they would be
willing to participate financially in a feasibility study of
disposal methods.
Mayor Glennon commented that this subject is currently under
study by a number of agencies already and, with no objectio,~
he referred the question to the Public l.~lfare Committee with
the recu~endation that the Committee investigate other sources
of obtaining the needed information.
E. CITY ADMINISTRATOR
(1) Mr. Huff reported that the City Attorney had checked proposed
Resolution No. 413, authorizing relinquishmost of a portion of
Res. 413 Fruitvale Avenue to the County and ~r. Johnston stated that it
Fruitvale Ave. was a standard procedure. It was moved by Ccuncilman Burry,
relinquishmost seconded by Councilman P~bbins and carried unanimously to adopt
Resolution'No. 413.
(2) The City Administrator reported that he had received a memorandum
from the Chief Building Official advising that the Fire ~arshal
Building has requested c?op~ration in obtaining compliance with the City
demolition- Code relative tQ structures located in Wildwood Park. The Fire
Wildwood Marshal requires that ~he buildings either be brought up to
Park Code or demolished. It was moved by Councilman Burry to
Authorize the staff to demolish the two City o~med unoccupied
-6-
SU~4ARy OF COUNCIL MINUTES - ~arch 6, ,1968
buildings located in ~?ildwood Park.. Councilman Hartma~ asked
if the occupied cottage should also be included for demolition
and ~lr. Huff said that the occupied cottage is not subject to
vandalism but that the other two. as well as the building owned
by the Historical Foundation are subject to extensive vandalism
and trespassing. He reported that the Sheriff's Department has
indicated that the buildings attract undesirable persons and
that activities conducted on these premises are a continuing
source of police concern. Councilman Burry withdre~y his motion
and the City Administrator was asked to determine from the Fire
Marshal and Building Inspector whether or not all the buildings
should be demolished. ~fr. Huff was also directed to contact
Mr. Willis Peck regarding the Historical Foundation building.
Planning (3) The Connell was advised that a Planning Process Y,;orkshop is
Workshop scheduled for March 23 at the University of California extension
at Santa Cruz.
(4) The AdministratiVe Aide reported that the force account building
maintenance p~ogram had been in effect for two months and that
Building his ~xalysis of this.trial period indicates that the program is
Maintenance practical and economically feasible. He recommended that the
Program prog~ram be continued and that some maintenance equipment~
including a wsxerg be purchased. Mr. Eads notedJ however, that
the $2500. budgeted for Youth Center maintenance is expected
to cover only about one half the actual exnenses. After some
Youth discussion~ ~{r. Nuff was directed to review the Youth Center
Center agreement relative to:the amount and/or limitation of maintenance
expenses costs for the Saratoga Youth Center. It wa~ moved by Councilman
Burry; seconded by CounCilman Robbins and carried unanimously
to c6ntinue the force account maintenance program on city
property other than the Youth Center and review the overall
program again in six months, with the resort relative to the
Youth Center Agreement to be reviewed at the next Council
meeting.
(4) The Adminis~rative Aide reported that he had artended a
Tax Reform conference in'Sacramento relative to tax refurm and that the
Conference thrust seemed to be in the direction of a ta~ credit method
whereby total local and state taxes could be credited against
Federal incame taxes. Mr. Eads also reported that it was
generally felt that it would be necessary to withhold State
inc~e taxes so that payment for services required would not
have to be delayed until the year was over.
VII COMMLrNICATIONS
A. I,~RITTEN
(1) A letter from the Saratoga Union Scbol District relative to the
Rerriman Ave. 11erriman Avenue extension was referred to the General Plan file
Extension for consideration at the time set for public hearing.
(2) The Council received copies of a letter from Mr. John Uilliams
Willjams - relative to a drainage problem on Springer Avenue and the City
Springer Ave. Attorney said that although he had not knol.m of this letter
Drainage he had dictated a letter which answered the questions raised
by Mr. ~illisms.
(3) The Council acknowledged a letter fram~r. Phillip gaines of
Rabies the County Health Department requesting cooperation from
Control citizens of the'area in the annual survey currently being
Survey conducted in the area as a rabies control measure.
SUY~4ARY OF COUNCIL MINUTES - ~,~arch 6, 1968
B. ORAL
(1) Mr. A1 Hanson, 13761 Dolphin Drive, commented regarding the
Allendale petition for a survey of the impact of the 1.3est Valley Junior
Avenue College to traffic in the Allendale Avenue area. .~lr./ ManSon
Traffic quoted a number of enrollment projections as well as area plans
Survey for major thoroughfares and collector streets and land use
development. All of these factors, Mr. }!anson contended,
indicate future traffic problems on Allendale Avenue that are
a source of considerable concern to the residents of the area.
}it. Hanson asked if representatives of his group might attend
the committee meeting to be scheduled to discuss this matter
and ~{ayor Glennon advised him that he would be contacted if
he would leave the Clerk his telephone number.
VIII ~DJOL~IE~
Mayor Glennonacknowledged, with pleasure, the presence of Planning.
Commissioners McFall, and Johnson; Bob Lewis, representing the Good
Government Group; ~irs. Dorothy Parker, who served coffee on behalf of
the Good Governmsnt Group; and ~rs. Scharf ~ho was a Council candidate
for the 1966 General election.
It ~as moved by Councilman Eurry, seconded by Ceuncilman Tyler, and
carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 10:10 P. ?{.
Respectfully submit~ed,
J. R~ I~jFF, CITY CLEP~'-
-8-