HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-02-1969 City Council Minutes SARATOGA CITY COURCI~
PlINUTES OF NEBTING - APRIL 2, 1969
TDE: lqednesday, April 2, 1969. - 7:30 P,b[.
PL~R: Saratoga City Council Chmnbers, 13777 Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga
TYPE: Regular Meeting
I, '. ORGANIZATION
Nayor Tyler called the usering to order at 7:33
· Ao ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmen Tyler, Robbing, Smith, Dwyer and Sanders
Absent: None
B. HINUTES
Councilman Dwyer asked that on page 2 of the Ninutes Iof Hatch 19,
1969, the dimensions given for trees in Ordinance 38.78, be correce-
ed to read '%0 inches in circ,wnference" instead of 55' inches diameter.
Ninutes ~ ,,-',~..'.,~1"/' o~ ~ I'~"'~ ~'~
Councilman Robbins said ~.~ ~-~ .... ~ .......
asked that a complete packeLof information
on subjects being studied by specific Council committies be given to
each CoUncilman, before consideration by the entire Cpuncil, to allo~
time fO~ study by such co~mittee.
Councilman Smith moved, and CounCilman D~yer seconded; that the
HinuteS Of the regular meeting of Hatch 19, 1969 be adopted as
mailed, With the correction noted by l~r. D~yet. The motion carried
unanimously.
Councilman Sanders asked that the Ninutes note he abstained from
voting, as he had not been present at the Narch 19, 1969 meeting.
BIDS At~ COI~rRACTS
A. Consideration of bids for construction of Civic Center Administra-
tion ~ing.
Hr. Robbing read the ~eport of the Planning COmmittee, dated April
1, 1969, ~hich f~Und~ that a clerical' error had bee, a made in com-
putation by Nr. Labt~cherie in his bid, to the amount of ~13,742,.
and reeuuauended that the Council accept his reformed bid totalling
$150,611 as the lowest responsible bid for the ~ork. iT he Coemaittee
Council also rec~nded that the city staff and architect ~darren Held be
Chambers authorized to work out modifications of the building Fo reduce total
Addition costs.
Hr. Held spoke from the audience, confirming his belief that the
materials list submitted by ~c. Labrucherie could ha~e been inad-
vertently c~aitted from his bid, and that he also thought certain
changes, such as elimination of stone facing and othdr items could
be ~orked out to reduce costs, ~ithout harm to the building concept
and use. ~ ~ "
Nt. Sanders moved and l~r. Smith seconded that the re~ort o~ the
Planning Cum~ittee on the Council Chambers Addition be approved,
but that no specific action be taken at this time on 'either. accept-
ing or rejecting any bids. ~he motion carried ununimougly.
PETITIONS, ORDINANCES AND FORHAL RESOLtrEIONS
A. I~ESOLUTION NO. 36-B-106 - ACCEFEING STIrgETS IN TRACT.3591 AI~
LEASING II~ROVE~NT SO~D
Res. 36-B-106 Nt. Huff stated that final inspection of the tract indicated that
Tract 3591 all deficiences had been corrected, and he rec~nded that streets
in said tract be accepted into the City street system for mainteno
alice,
Hr. Robbins moved adoption of Resolution No. 36-IP106, accepting
dedication of streets ~or Tract No. 3591, and relea.se of Improvement
Saratoga Cit uncil Minutes Continued
April 2, 1969
Bond No. B519280, issued by United Pacific Insurance Co. .t4r. Sanders
seconded, and the motion carried unanimously.
B. ORDINANCE NO. 38.28 - AN ORDINANCE AHENDINC I~E SARAr.OGA CI~Z CODE
PROHIBITING ISSU~a~CE OF ~IE BU~tDING PEBNrrS UNTIL PI~VIOUS VIOLA-
TIONS CORRECTS), ~ PROVIDING REGULATIONS RE EXPIRATION 6F RERKITS-
INTRODUCTION ' ~
'.~ I~r. l~f~ ~aid the ordinance ~zas prim~i~;designed to give~ the
Chief Building Inspector the right to refuse permits :~o firms
having outstanding violations of the building code, s~ch as in the
Ordinance 38.28 ease of s~imming pools, ~here property o~ners had had to ~orrect
certain conditions, although the fault la~ ~ith the contractor.
Enactment of the ordinance vould enable the inspector., to b~ring
pressure on contractors, on plumbing, electrical, grading ~snd
moving permits as ~ell as building permits.
Hr, Robbins moved that. Ordinance lqoo 38.28 be introduced, and the
reading ~aived; r4r. Sanders seconded, and the motion~carried
animously.. In the absence o£ obtection, the Hayor declare40rd.
HU. 38.28 introduced.
C. RESOLt~EION IK), HV-18 - RESOLUTION OF ~qiE CITY OF SARATOGA
1~O FA~aNG AREA N)JACEt~r ~O FIRE HYDR~rS TO I~N FEE~,
Res. ~N-18 Nr, Ruff stated that the Saratoga Fire District found:~a distance of
ten feet for parking near h~drants yes sufficient fo~'~Sara~oga, and
that the city could, by adopting the resolution, requ..i. re this dis-
tance instead of the 15 feet indicated in the State r4Qtor ~ehicle
Code, as it yes a matter of local discretion, ascordi~g t0 the la~,
l~ro Sanders moved and Hr, Smith seconded adoption of t~esoiution No.
HV-18, and the motion carried unanimously,
Do RESOLUTION NO. SDX-~572 = RESOLIFEION ABA~)ONING STOgN~DRAIN EASE-
.~ :
Hr, Huff repe~ed that a substitute drain easement h~ ~
. be n record-
. ·
ed~ .and that the.'Chan~e ~as being made to conserve s'.~e~al important
.t~.es on the BroOksida Club ,eite 'adjacent t~ Tracts ~57~'~ and ~573,
Rbs; 'SDX-~72 Prides Crossing. l~e easement ~ss dedicated to the ~ty< for
Brookside Club installation of s~orm drain facilities. ~; .
Easement "
Nr~. Smith moved~ 1~, RobbinS .secOnded adoption o~ Resolution
Sb~'4572; the ~tion carrie~o
1~; .D~r and Hmr, s~nders asked that the minute~ note the~ both
abstained from voting on the resolution, as both are mem~re of
the 'Club. !~
E, RES~U~ION NO. ~75 o RESOLUTION APPROVING PA~N~ FO~ EXTRA ~ORK-
SAI~I~.~ CAt~U$ ASSESSIlENT DISTRICE '~
': . ~
Hro Ruff explained that this payment, for ~hich the Q~st~ct yes
liable, had been submitted late, after the resolutio~ac~pting
Res, ~75 completion had been adopted; the york included extra ~;rad~ng to
s.c, Assessment prevent rainstorm d~aa~e, according to the letter ~r~ Hb~r~ Aumack,
District Nark Taomas Co, engineer. ~.~
r4r, Robbins asked ~;hether the fault lay in the basic .~esi~n, or in
the construction york itself, stating that as a tax payer ~e thought
more study of the matter ~as appropriate.
~ithout objection, the l~ayor referred Resolution No. 675 t.o the
Public Welfare C~..~.ittee.
F. ORDINAECE NG. NS-3.2~ - ~M~ ORDIN~qCE ANENDING ORDINANCE NS-3, THE
ZONING ORDINANCE OF ~{E CITY OF SN~}C,A, BY ~M)DIIqG ARrlC~.E 22
· HERE~O, EI~vrlYt~D '~UBLIC UTILITIES', ~ RF~UIRING A~L
b~rlLITZES ~O BE INST~f-t~ UIqDERGS~U~) IN ALL ZONING DISTRICES IN
Ord, NS-3.20 I~E CITY- II~EI~ODUCrlON
Underground .
Utilities Hr, Huff explained that no~ ~eae t~le time for intreduc,t!on o[. the
ordinance to contain the requirements stated in Emergency Ordinance
3=E-6 and that the Planning C~ission reco~needed its ,ndoption as
SararoBe CiL~7 cll }firmtee Continued
Ap=il 2, 1969
written by Counsel, following public hearings on the batter.
In answer to Mr. Dwyer, ~lr. Walker said that there w~re s~me
amendments proposed to the ordinance as written by the City
Attorney, suggested by the public utilities firms.
The Mayor cohented that the emergency ordinance had'.. been studied
by the Public ~/elfare Connittee in conjunction with the Planning
Caission, and it would be appropriate for these tw~ groups to
review the proposed ~nendments for possible change.
Mr. Smith moved, and Mr. Dwyer seconded that Ordinan~e No. NS-3.20
be introduced and the reading waived, and a public heBring be set
for the next regular Council meeting. The motion ca[ried unanimous-
ly.
G. RESOLUTION. NO. 476 - RESOLUTION EI~)ORSING THE SIERRA!CLUB P~DJEUT
TO BUILD A TRAIL FROM CASTLE ROCK PARK TO ANO NUEVO
Mr. Dwyer read the resolution outlining the Sierra ~ub project to
Pas. 476 build about 14 miles of hiking trail leading from St~vens Creek
Trail Buildiq~ Park to Castle Reck through Big Basin Park thence to: Ano Nuevo and
Castle Rock ~ark his personal letter reco~ending Council endorsement]!, and inviting
to Ano Nuevo' interested Saratogans to participate.
Mr. Robbins noted the date of April 19 was the anniversary of Paul
Reveress ride, celebrated. as Patriotss Day in New En,~laud states.
Mr. Dwyer moved adoption of Resolution No. 476, Mr. 'fRobbins second-
ed, and the Eotion carried unanimously.
H. RESOLUTION NO. 399-~ - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC!~ OF SARATOGA
CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING TO DETEI~IINE I4HETHER PUBLICi NECESSITY,
HEALTH, SAFETY, OR ~ELFARE REQUIRES THE FORMATION OF AN U~DERGROUND
UTILITY DISTRICT ON THE CIVIC CENTER PROPERTY ON FRUITVALE AVENUE.
Res. 399-~
UGU ][3 Mayor Tyler read Resolution No. 399-4, setting the d,ate of April
16, 1969 for a public hearing. Mr. Huff said Mr. CoWan of P.G.& E.
thought it would be possible for the City to draw ahead on its 1970
share of PUC Rule 20 funds to finance the project, estimated to cost
about $8500.
Mr.. Sm{th moved adoption of Res01ution No. 399-4, and Mr. Sanders
seconded; the motion carried unanimously.
IV. SUBDIVISIONS, BUILDING SITES AND ZONING REQUESTS
A. RESOLUTION SDH-790-1 - S6SS ION OF C6 CIL OF
CITY OF SARATOGA APPROVlNG BUILDING SITE 'OF MIKE OLAVARRi
~f; HUff S ated all c6ndi~io~s 'had 6een me~ f6r! the one 10t sit~
, ,: vie e A enae and herec~;neuded ado~ioni
SDR~O ~. ~it~ ~0~aH a~ lit. Robblns seconded adoption of Resolution No.
Final Site SDR-790-1 and ~he motion carried unanimously,
Approval
B, SDR-796 - A. L, HANSON - REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATIOI] OF CObDITION
OF BUILDING SITE APPROVAL REQUIREHENT THAT UI~ERGROtr[D UTILITIES
BE INSTALLED FOR ONE LOT ON DOLPHINE DRIVE
SDR-796
Request to Mr. !~alker reported that the Planning Connnission re~cn~ended denial
I~aive of Mr. Hanson's request for waiver of underground u~ilities for a
Undergroup~t~,ng nov lot on Dolphin Drive, north of Miendale Avenue;, A~ter brief
discussion of the application, the Mayor, in the absence of objec-
tion, referred the request to the Public ~lelfare Con~nittee, noting
that it might confer with the Planning Co~nissiou on the matter.
C. SDR-732 - FRANKLIN HOleS
Referring to the letter signed by San Viviano of Franklin Homes
expressing unhappiness regarding pathways to be laid out at their
SARATOGA CITY CIL MINUTES CONTINUED
APRIl 2, 1969
development off Big Basin Way, l~ayor Tyler said thorpe were several
SDR-732 points raised that deserved an answer, especially paragraphs 2, 3,
Franklin Hom~,~S 6 and 7,
re Pathway
In the absence of objection, he referred the matter to the Planning
D. SDR-775 - DR, HICHAEL KOWlTZ
The mayor said there were points raised in the Lye letters by l~rs.
K~itz on SDR-775, which required further study. Inlthe absence of
SDR-775 objection, he referred the matter to the Public Well.are
Kowitz and continued the petition to.the meeting of April 1~, 1969,
E, SD-~85 - DITE-CRANE CREENBRIER - FINAL ~ APPROVAL:iFOR 60 LOTS-
COX AVENUE a SEA GULL WAY
Hr, Huff said final map approval for the first section of the
Creenvrier development was ready and that all but three conditions
as stated in Resolution SD-785-1 had been met, t~r..~anders moved
and l~r, Robbins seconded adoption of Resolution SD-785-1 which
carried unanimously.
bit. Ditz spoke from the audience, outlining his difficulty in
obtaining a necessary drainage easement to Rodeo Cre~k through a
saclion of state-owned property. He said that the State had de-
clared the properly as surplus and wanted to sell it:u to him, but ..:.
that all he wanted was an easement, as the property i~as unsuitable
for a building site. He also asked if the City wanted to purchase
it as part of a proposed park location, and said tha~ he was holding
five lots aside from his development if the city desired it for a
SD-785 park, He offered to produce bonding to any ~raount r.equired by the
Final Nap city, so his development could proceed. The l~ayor
Approval the question of the park site was being held, pendin~ outcome of
Tract 4628 ,~co~endations from the parks consultants, a~t no d~finite answer
Ditz-Crane could be given at this time. 14r. Ditz then asked i~ ha could pay
the required park and recreation fee in lieu of land:, and ldr. Huff
responded that the amount would be about $20,000. l~a added that
the condition requirir~ £inal clearance from Cuperti~o Sanitary
District would probably be forthcoming without probl~.
14r. Schute of the firm of ~lacKay and Somps, engineer~ for the
Ditz-Crane project, stated he foresaw no problem in bbtaining a
drainage easement agreement though ~e RaJkevich property, and
that all that was nknded was the easement through th~ state-owned
parcel.
l~r. Johnston suggested in view of 14r. Di(z' ~illin~ss to Obtain
bondin~ SS ~equired, that some generalized lan~usg~,~ould be con,
rained in the resolution 'and thus finaliza the findl!msp applica'
tion... Ha s~ge~tea the following: ~hat Condition 2 be fevi~ed
read "paymei~t of ~ark faa o~ 'a~UiVaient bond ~o ~ha i~nount requi~-
ed in:lieu 0~ ,d~dt, cat~on'of the required park proper,~y', and that
Condi~ion 3 ba revised to read "Submit' bond ~iid .adde~da
im~6~e~nt ag~n~ :. to. assd~a ~acqUiAi~i~ ~f necessary drainage
aas~rd~n~ ~ R~ta~ creek within 180 days,
14r.. Robbins moved and l~r. Smith seconded that Counc!1 rescind
adoption of Resolution No. SD-785-1, and the motion 'carried.
~lr. Sanders moved and 14r. Smith seconded that ResolUtion No.
785-1 ba revised to incorporate the changes suggesta~'d by
Johnston, and the revised resolution be adopted. TIle motion
carried unanimously.
blr. Ditz thanked the Council and promised coeperati~n on possible
development of the park site, if it was selected.
F. RIgSOLUTION NO. SDR-805-1 - P, ESOLUTION OF THE CITY O~
APPROVING BUIlDING SITE OF FRANK S. TATE, LA PAL~
SARATOGA AVENUE
-4-
" SARATOGA CZl'~ Cr',r, ~'nqtj'Te:s CONTII',~ !':
APRIL 2, 1969
F~. Huff read the resolution, reckriding its adoptSon subject
to siSnin5 of site approval agreement and offer of d~..clication
for street purposes.
Hes. SDR 805-,1
Tats Mr. Smith moved and 1~. Robbins seconds6 adoption of;iReeolution
No. SDR-8OS-1, and the motion carried unanimously.
G. RESOLUTION NO. SDR-773-1 - DON OBLAI~)0 - VERDE VIST~-LANE
? ? 3 Mr. Huff stated that all conditions had !b~n met except for
signinS the bond, payinE inspection fees and siSninE~. the buildinS
~JJ-~ ~ site agreement. He tecou.~.endad adoption, subject tot the conditions
~L~.,~ stated.
Mx. Robbins moved and Mr. Smith seconded adoption of SDR-773-1,
and the motion carried unanimously.
V. PUBLIC BEARINGS
A. C-121 - JOHN W. Ir6qlN - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC BEA~ING ON APPLI-
CATION TO REZONE FROM "P-A" (PP, OFESSlONAL-ADMINISTRATIVE)
C-121 "R-M-3,000" (MULTI-~AMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO "C-V" (VISITOR-
Irwin COI~4ERCIAL) THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH A}~) SOUTH SIDES
rezontr~ OF BIG BASIN WAY FROM FIFTH STREET WEST TO THE SOUTH~ERLY TURN
to C-V ~ EXTENSION OF BIG BASIN WAY. SECO~]) READING - ORDINANCE
BE-3-ZC-45.
Mr. Huff stated the ordinance had been introduced a~ the previous
reSular meetinS, the readinS had been waived, and t~lat no
correspondence had been received in the interim.
The Mayor declared the public hearing open at 9:04 ~.M. and
invited counuent from the audience. There was none.
Mr. Smith moved and Mr. Dwyer seconded that the publj!c hearinS
be closed, and in the absence of objection, the Mayor so
ordered at 9:05 P.M.
Mr. Smith moved adoption of Ordinance NS-3-ZC-45, bit. Dwyer
seconded, and the motion carried unanimously.
The MayOr directed a 15-Minute recess be taken at 9:D6 P.M.
The meetin~ Was callsd back to order at 9:26
2-B .- UmSRCROOm I'.XT ViSTRlC - mmo
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC BEARING ON ESTABLISHMENT OF UM~E~iG~OU~D
UTILITY DiStRICT 2-B - VERDE VISTA LANE
UGU 2-B
Verde Vista ~ane Mr. Huff outlined the backSround of the hearinE~ or%Sinally
Resn 4~7 opened in August, 1968 and continued to allow assem~linS
additional data, and that property owners concerned ~had been
duly noticed reSardinS individual costs. He added ~het P.O. & E.
was of the opinion that the east west part of Boyce !Lane could
not be included under Rule 20A.
The Mayor declared the p~.blic hearing open at 9:30 P.M.
Mr. Smith readr the report of the Public Welfare Committee
dated April 1, 1969, starinS that the last sentence!of the
first paragraph should end followinS the .phrase"~ .]. will
approximate $~,000.', and the remainder of the sentence be struck
out. He summarized the recoannendation of the coua~i~tee, refertinS
to the revised map for the district, dated April 2,i1969 as
representing the revised boundaries. Only five par~cels and four
property owners - Orlando, Boyce, Cassin and Bate (OwninE
two lots) would now be included in the district. The lots to be
included in the revised district would include Assessors parcel
nmubers 50, 28, 45, and 47 only.
In response to the Mayor's question if additional public hearings
were required in the case of substantial change' to a proposal,
Mr. Johnston said no, because the purpose of public hearinSs
was to allow for modifications.
SARATOGA CI~Y~CIL I'IINUTES COI~INUED
APRIL 2, 1969
The Mayor asked if everyone was clear on what lots w uld be
included and what would be excluded from the Distric~, and
invited countant from the audience° There was none.
Mr. Smith moved and Mr. Sanders seconded that the public hearing
be closed, and in the absence of objection the Mayorf so ordered
at 9:38 P.M.
Mr. Smith moved adoption of Resolution No. 477, stating correct
description of boundaries together vith the corrected map,
dated April 2, 1969; Mr. Robbins seconded and the m~tion carried
unanimously. Mr..~mith moved that the resolution bedsmended
to include assessor'e parcels Numbers 45, 46, !47, ~O 'and 28
specifically; Mr. D~yer seconded and the motion carried.
VI. ADMINISTRATIVE I~TERS
A. MAYOR
1.The Mayor reminded the Counci~ of the ICC dinner [meeting
on April 3 at the Hacienda Inn. :
2. Library
Mayor Tyler reed his memo on development of library services
~or Saratoga, including an expansion of the Village branch by
construction of a new library buildin~ of 5800 s~uare feet on
the adjacent property, and .construction of a 15,000 square
foot library near ArgOnaut Shopping Center, both ito be financed
by rental receipts from the County library system].
~r. Robbins moved m~i Mr. Smith seconded that the~roJects be
a approved as recmnded by fi~.e Hayor, and the motion carried
unanimously. ~r. Sanders said special creederich was due
Nr. Tyler ~or his work on the library . problem. Nr. Ceorge
Fartier, Ceunt7 Librarian, .said desi~ of ~he new libraries would
be in accord.~.ce fish. asticipa~ed arch o~ the city durinZ
she next 20 years, and that he stood ra~!y to costinns
~ooperation with the Council, Hayor and City staf:.~ in movi~
ahead on tb~ projects, with the possible aid o~ s~me federal
B ~ FINANCE
[; :.
Paymen~ of '~la~me
~ response ~b a question by .Nr. Sander~; ~r. Huf~
explained that Hartant Ro. 10811 payabl~ tO C.H. Day
C~nstru~tl0n Co. was ~or installation o~ Storm drains
tees due Dale R. C. aClin as part of his cont~ant services
the City.
Hr. Huff explained that rio. 10807 was payable to ~onald Straub
because · ~l~e on his car was destroyed by a special type of nail
installed by the city on a HarleiSh Ave. traffic ~ountero
Mr. Robbins moved, and Nr. Sanders seconded that disbursement
af warrants No. 1077~ thrott~h Noo 10813 be approv.~d., and that
the t~yor he authorized Co sign the warrants, for~a total
$22,872.83. ~he motion carried unanimously.
C. COt~CIL C0ti{IXTEES AND EE~ORT$
1° Public Welfare C~u~lttee
Mr. Smith reed the report on the police study, stating that an
additional citizen c~.uiCtee report would duplicate the prepar-
ation and effort contained in the Lewis report on crime pre-
vention and la~ enforcement in Saratoga, and r.eCo.'-.ueuding that
use 'o~ special Saratoga citizen expertise, as suggested by
~ryer and other members o~ his co~n~it~ee, be .held in abeyance
for possible future utitization. No Council action was required.
.~...
SARATOGA CITY UNTIL bilNUTES CONTINUED
APRIL 2, 1969 :
2 Management Co~uittee
Mr. Sanders read the coum,ittee report on the'Chamber of
Commerce request for City funding to underwrite :~he Chmnber's
activities, recommending that the City no~ alloc~te'Sbch 'funds,
but continue its membership plus outright purchase of 1150
maps from the Ch~nber for distribution at City H~ll.
Sanders added that the Co~.ra..unity-oriented effOr~.$ of the
Chamber were praiseworthy, but ~hat Saratoga Unlike .Other
Chamber of booster-type cities, imposed a onestime only, nO~ .an annual
C~n~uerce tax for merchant licenses.
Request ,". !; !
for financial Mr. Tyler. commented that there might be office Space made
support available for the Chainbares use ~hen the Village[LibrlarY facility
was expanded. Mr. Robbins Said that as a matterror ~,rinciple.
the citycould contribute funds ohly/if it had' control: of such
funds and their expeadit~re. Mr~ Tyler nbted' that t~e original
intend of the license fee was t5 pay costs of administering
licensing.
Attorney Tracy Tumlin, teEre e t'~' the
S n i Chamber,~said. that some
return from sales tax revenue de~ived from local[ merdhants
could be returned to them in the f~i'~ of aid to the dh~nber.
The Mayor sake4 the co~ittee to ~dn(inue its review .~.of this
matter. !
3. Policy Co~ittee
Mr. Dwyer read the coun~ittee repot~ on [he villa, ge M~rchants
request for $2150 to aid in finending Chris~nas ,:deco~,ations,
and rec~ndin~ that the City not participate, Lbut ~hat the
merchants continue their ~eautification efforts.:
Village Merchants Mr. Smith, as a committee member, ~t~ated that he, was' not in
Request re complete a~reement with the statements contained in ~he 4th
Chrismas Dec- paraSraph of the report, in that he Was not wholly o~posed'
orations. to some contribution by the City, but not to thd~amodnt
requested. Mrs. Diana Tomlin, referiing to the iposs~bility
of some return to the merchants from sales tax reven~e, added
that the decoratio~s would remain the property ef th4 city,
and that they represented a civic rather than ~! c~rcial
effort.
Mr. Dwyer said that the Village was not the only! shopping
center in SaratoSs, 'and that Quito, Argonaut, and th~ Blue Hills
merchants would ha~e to be considered. Mr. Tyl~; said the sales
tax w~s paid by purchasers, not by the merchanteli- bu~ that
perhaps a change in business tax licensin= fees would' receive
support of the merchants. ~ :
C. DEPARTMENT HEADS AND OFFICERS :
Public ~orks Director Shook requested authority to advertise
for bids to improve Cox Avenue be~eeu Woedmont and; IoneiCourt,
as the unimproved portion of the street was a water ~Co11¢ctor.
Improvement funds total.ling $5500 had already been ~loc~ted in
the budget, - If advertised, bids could be opened Mayi 7, 1969o
authorize bids :
Cox avenue Mr;' 'Robbins moved that authority be granted the public w~rks
dep~r~nent to advertise bids l for imprOVement of Cox bet~een
goodmont and Ioue court; Mx. Smith seconded~ and the motion
carried unanimouely. ~ ':
Mr. Shook announced the County*s intent to resur~ace~Qui~o Road
but pointed out that capping would aggrevatea bad d[ain~.ge sit-
nation. The proposed street improvement would be a joi~ effort
of three jurisdictions - the County. City of San JosS, al~d City
of Saratoga, but should not be done until installati~h o~
drain by Saratoga at
inE had not yet bean t sin , rd
with the cityts master storm drain plan. ~;
TY~OUNCIL ' "'
SARATOGA CI Iv, iNUrES COiT~i'NUI~
APRIL 2, 1969
Mar. Huff stated that drainage from Saratoga would be carried
through downstream drains built some years ago to accoYmodate
Authorize Bids the runoff.
quitO Rd.
Drain Mr. Smith moved, and I~r. Sanders seconded that City ~dvertise for
bids on ~a Quito Storm Drain. Motion carried unanimously.
E. CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Mr. Huff reported on a letter from Mrs. Kocher regarding main-
Wildwood P~[k ten~nce of Wildwood Park water level. Without objection, the
Water Mayor referred the matter to the Planning Committee.
COMMUNICATIONS
A. gritten
City qf Sa~. Jose 1, The letter dated March 26, 1969, from the City of San Jose,
re P~ospect indicating its intent to participate in desgin plans for
LandsCapin~ landscaping the Prospect Road median strip was noted.
2. The letter dated March 31, 1969, requesting assistance by the
Youth Cen~,er city relative to capital improvements for the Youth Center was
L~tterjj referred in the absence of objection, to the Management Co~nittee.
3. The letter dated April 2, 1969, from John Rodrigues relative to
issuance of building permits prior to final map recordation was
discussed by Mr. Johnston, who explained that ha had already
informed Mr. Rodrigues that it vaa permissible to file a final
SD map on only the portion of a subdivision development needed for
Rodrigues model homes, prior to filing final maps for the entire project;
and that ha had told the applicant that the ordinance did not
permit nor allow for any variance or exception.
The Mayor directed Mr. Huff to writs a letter to ~his effect
=o Mr. Rodriguas.
B. ORAL
t. Mr. Bryer. stated that he appreciated meeting with Mr. Dwyer
and Mr'. Smith on~ the policin~ matter, and that the Congress
for Co,.uunidy Progress con~ittea stood ready and willing to
cooperate.
2. P. G. & E. M~nager Joe Cowan presented the Council with a
Check for $22,780.82, representing the City of Saratoga'a
franchise payment for the a~rrent year.
VIII, A~JOURIqMENT
Mayo~ Tyler thanked dhe following citisens for their attendan~e~
Planning Coa~aisdione~ Crisp; Dr. J. J~ Sitnay; Jod Covet;' Shelley
Wiliioms; Mr. Lewis, Park Con~nisdio6e~; Mr, B~yeri Mr. Snd Mrs.
T~nntin,; Mr. Robert Ewing, Mr. A& T. McAlpina and Mrd~ Zara van Wichen
of the Chember of COnunercd; and Mrs. Moss of the Good G0vernmend Group
fdr COfee. e serVed ~t reCe~s~
The meeting adjourned a~ 10:45 PoM.
Respectfully submitted, :
J. R, Huff, City Clerk