HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-21-1978 City Council Minutes MINTUES
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
TIME:. Tuesday, March 21, 1978 - 7:30 P.M.
PLACE: Crisp Conference Room City Hall, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California
TYPE: Adjourned Regular Meeting
I. ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmen Matteoni, Corr, Kalb, Kraus, and Callon
Absent: None
II. BIDS AND CONTRACTS
A. Co~si~at~o~ of Add~t~nc~ of O~te~ ~ $96,000 for Sale of ARCO Site -
Big Basin Way
The City Manager reported to the Council on his meeting with Mr.
Joseph Masek of Masek Enterprises and Mr. Rosenfeld ~th~ adjacent
property owner to the ARCO Site on Monday, March 20. At that meeting
the following points were discussed:
1. The access problem for the Rosenfeld Property from Big
Basin Way
2. The potential parking problem for the ARCO Site
3. The committment to a future parking assessment district
It was pointed out that during that meeting the development expectations
of both owners were reviewed. They were as follows:
Rosenfeld - 9,000 square feet of retail/commercial
Masek - 6,000 square feet - restaurant
1,500 square feet - office space
In reviewing these requirements it was pointed out that if the
parcels were taken separately and they were to meet the requirement
of the existing development ordinance the following parking require-
ments would be enforced:
Rosenfeld - 9,000 square feet retail at 1 space per 200 square
feet, equals 45 spaces
Masek - 6,000 square feet for restaurant use at 1 space per
75 square feet, equals 65 spaces
1,500 square feet of office space at 1 space per 200
square feet, equals 9 for a subtotal of 74
Grand total for both parcels - 119 spaces
Discussions also centered around a committment of both property owners
to a future parking district. Assuming a development ratio of the
development on the above mentioned square footage and in a negotiated
ratio of 380 square feet per space which is close to that currently
existing in Parking District #2, the requirementslfor the total
16,500 square feet would be an average of~380 feet that would equal
a requirement of 43 spaces. Based on these discussions, both Mr.
Masek and Mr. Rosenfeld indicated their interest in pursuing their
individual developments and join a future parking assessment'district.
It was pointed out by the City Manager that because the City has no
control over whether or not the two parcels are developed together
but at the present time both property owners are indicating such
intent, that the City can control the implementation of the above
mentioned conditions through the conditioning of the required develop-
ment site approval for these two parcels. It was recognized in
order for either owner to obtain maximum"useage and good'access and
circulation, they would'have to mostiik~ly work together to get the
b~st development results.
The City Manager recommended that'.th~fC±ty~Cou~iI~for~ly accept
Mr. Masek's bid of $96,000 for the ARCO Site based on the,anticipated
conditions to be included in his Building Site Approval as previously
discussed.
The question was also raised concerning the rest of the proposed
parking district and the current potential development that could
take place on the land available. It was pointed out'that the forty-
three spaces in question on these two sites would not impact the
rest of the district and was ~onsist~nt with the ratio~which had
previously been 'discussed with other property-owners in the area.
There being no further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Kalb,
seconded by Councilwoman Corr'that the City accept Mr. Masek's offer
of $96,000 and he be required to follow the other steps and Resolution
840 pertaining to the provision of an'additional 15% of the $96,000
to be provided at the opening of a"thirty-day escrow'to'be opened within
five days of the bid acceptance.
It was further moved that the conditions for development as discussed
in the City Manager's report of March 21, 1978 be included in the
conditions of development as indicative of the City Council's position
relevant to the development of these two sights.
The motion carried unanimously.
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 8:00 P.M.