Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-04-1982 City Council Minutes SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL TIME: Wednesday, August 4, 1982 - 7:30 p.m. PLACE: City Council Chambers, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue TYPE: Regular Meeting CLOSED SESSION - Litigation Matters - 5:00 p.m. - City Hall Conference Roc~ COD4v~TI'~:~.' OF THE WHOLE - 6:00 p.m. - Community Center Meeting Room, 19655 Allendale I. Discussion of Council Priorities REGULAR ME~TING - 7:30 p.m. I. ORGANIZATION A. ROlL CALL - Counciln~mbers Clevenger, Fah~tti, Mallory, D~Dyles, and Mayor Callon present at 7:35 p.m. B. MINUTES- 7/21 MALIDRY/CLEVtRqGER MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF 7/21 AS SI/RVil'ITEU. Passed 5-0. II. ~ICATIONS Ao ORAL There were no oral cOnmunications. B. WRI'iTfI~ N6' Written communications required response or action except for #3 requesting waiver of fees; this was deferred to Admj/listrative Matters, Item VIII. III. SUBDM SIONS, BUILDING SITES, AND ZONING REQUESTS None. IV. PETITIONS, ORD]lXIANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution con~ding Sean Grovier MALIDRY/FANRr.I.I MOVED ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 2002. Passed 5-0. B. Resolution raising Civic Theater Rental Rates Jim Naiveson, ~epresenting the ~ity Players of LOs Gatos-Saratoga, spoke against the rate increase , saying that it would be a financial hardship for the dr~na groups and would reduce incc~ne to the City because groups could no longer afford the Civic Theater. Edward Hand spoke as President of the West Valley Light Opera Association. He believed the increase would be a great financial burden, and he asked whether, if the gross receipts policy went into effect, it ~ould be in addition to the rate increase. Acting City Manager explained that staff was requesting Council direc- tion on a gross receipts policy, and it was not in the implenentation stage. Judith Sutton spoke as .a representative of Valley Institute of Theater Arts. She explained that VITA did not have a signed contract for its Christmas pro- gram, so they would have to pay the increased rates. She requested that the rate increase be made effective after the program. because their budget was set. Mayor Callon asked if the groups had made any alternative suggestions at their meeting with staff. Maintenance Services Director reported that it had been suggested that the rate increase become effective January 1 because of staff' s prior policy that signed contracts did not have to be submitted until 30 days before the proposed use of the theater. Mr. Hand then stated, in response to Councilmember Fanelli, that tickets had been pre-seld. 2-8/4/82 Frederick W. Hassett then sFoke for a period of 8 minutes, outlining the history of the Saratoga Drama Group and the costs involved in its productions. He also reported on various arrangenents other cities had with their drama groups.and on the benefits' of the group to the City. He expressed "a-":£~e-~'~,r rj. th~t:'~ the dr~na groups were being asked to pay costs that should be berne by the City and asked that the City extend consideration to the gTzoups. · · Councilmenbers discussed the purpose of tl!e _fee increase, which was to ~re~ o'~ e:!r operating costs; possibility of re-calculating the increase on a 365-day hasis to reduce it; the fact that Saratoga cannot be compared. with other cities which have much larger tax revenues'; the possibility of making the increase effective later; the lack of a logical basis for dis- tinguishing between drama groups and other groups which' have had City funds reduced; the possibility of raising City revenues through taxes or other means. FANRT,T,I/CLEV~qGER MDV~]D TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 780-22 WITH AN ~'F~CTIVE DATE OF JANUARY 1, 1983. Passed 4-1 (Moyles opposed). Councilmember Moyles stated that he favored making the effective date August 1. Since th~ hour of 8:00 p.m. had arrived, Mayor Callon proceeded to public hearings as required by ordinance. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A.1 Proposed General Plan Amendments 82-1B and 82-1C, Moreland School District, E1 Quito Park School and Brookview School, to change General Plan Designation fzom Cun.,,~mity Facility to Medit~n De.nsity Residential; and 82-1-E, Spaich, Property at Northeast Corner of Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road and Miljevich Drive, to change General Plan Designation frc~ Proposed Park to Medium Density Residential A.2 Approval of Negative Declarations on GPA's 82-1-B, 82-1-C~ 82-1-E, and 82-1-D (Saratoga Horticultural Foundation, 5.72 acre parcel i~ lcoated at 20605 Verde Vista Lane, to change General Plan Designation from Private Open Space to Meditm Density Residential) A. 3 Consider resolution approving General Plan Amendments 82-1-B, 82-1-C, 82-1-D and 82-1-E The above items concerning four General Plan Amendments were considered as a single iten~ since they would be consolidated into one General Plan Amend- ment if approved. The public hearing was opened at 8:15 p.m. Robert Reasoner, Superintendent of the Moreland School District, stated that the closing of the two schools had been necessitated by dropping enrol-lments .ar~ that their sale was now required due to financial problems. John Anderson, 1196 Forest Creek Drive, San Jose, spoke as a past president of the School Board, stating that the district bad seven surplus sites, and costs for the sch0ol~-diduhot decline even though enrollments declined. In answer to Mayor .Callon, he stated that E1 Quito School and been closed for about 8 years, and Brookview School, akout 2% ~ears. In answer to Council- member Mallory, he stated that the declsibns on-which schools to sell was based on factors which might result in increased enrollments, such as location, population in the area, and the possibility of growth. Sally Carlson, 12234 Brookglen Drive, spoke' as a member of the Property A~viso~ Con~aittee to the District. She stated that she had taken the minutes of their meeting of Jan~ry 12, 1982, and noted that the PAC had not voted unanimously on long-term lease of the site, contrary to the Saratoga Park Woods HontKTwners letter Of February 22, and they had voted with the qualification "as long as financially feas'.zble," which had been omitted from that letter.' She believed that the B~ookview site should not be kept as open space to the detriment of the District. Further, she expressed disnay that the Planning Conmtission,~= ' after once voting to approve the Brookview change, bad voted on June 24, 1982, to retain it as a school site, although the item was not on the agenda and no one from the District was present. She suggested that the homeowners asso- ciation buy part of the property to retain as open space. Jim Russell, 12777 Saratoga Court, spoke as a member of Saratoga Park Woods 3-8/4/82 Homeowners Association, saying that they had been addressing this problem for a long time and were attempting to retain a more personal school system. He asserted that those opposing his group were outsiders. Williem Brermx)ck, 18831 Kosich Drive, stated that the drop in enrollments was ending, and the school sites might be needed at a later time. He also felt that Area D needed the open space. Brookview School, he said, is the most profitable for the District because of their long-term tenant, end a dffferentI~sch~ol site should be sold. Further, he believed that funds from the sale would be used for capital improvenents rather than educational progrins. Janet HarriS, Ccmer Drive, spoke as Vice President of the Girls Soccer League. She stated that the League needed the school site to use as a field. In respenso to Councilmember Fanelli, she stated that she believed the District bs_j performed the maintenance on the field, but she was not sure they could continue to do so. Chris Everett, 18829 Westview, spoke for retaining the school site because the sale of the property would be a short-term benefit, but retaining it would allow an ~alternative educational opportunity, besides making a profit for the District. Randy Schneider spoke as a member of the Saratoga Park Woods Homeowners Association, Saying that the residents did want tong-term leasing of the Brookview school site. He felt the District should help Saratoga. Mr. Peasoner rose again to state that the District did wish to help Saratoga and was, indeed, legally responsible for Saratoga students. The Board had made the decision to sell the site, he said, and the only question was under what General Plan Designation it would be sold. In response to Councilmember Mallory, he said the District did not have the money to maintain the site as open space, although they would like to do so. Mr. Anderson rose again in response to Mayor Callon to state that if the restrictions on the leassee were loosened, which might allow greater profit, that would not be a major factor in the decision as to whether to sell the site. Councilmentors discussed the school sites, considering such factors as ingress and egress; whether to act now would be "patchwork;" lack of open space in the area; whether the d~nographics supported selling of the sites; right of the public school system to sell its property; use of the property being consistent with the neighborhood; possibility that residential development might be less obtrusive than leasing; the inappropriateness of Council making a decision which should be the school district's; possibility of the residents' buying property for open space; possible inappropriateness of the Planning Cul~fH ssion in voting, without a full conmission, to keep Brook- view School as con]nunity facility when the fnlll ccm~mission had previously voted to change it to mediun density residential~ possibility of returning the matter to the Planning Commission; possibility of the hsmeowners' forming an assessment districk to provide open space. Robert Peck, The White Ccmpany, spoke as a representative of the applicant for General Plan change on the Spaich property, saying that they were attempt- ing to conform to the same map used when the property was subdivided. No one furthelr appeared to speak on any of the General Plan changes, and the public hearing was closed at 9:15 p.m. FAN'RLT.I/MALIDRy MOVtD APPt~DVAL OF NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS ON GPA's 82-1-B, 82-1-C, 82-1-E, and 82-1-D (Saratoga Horticultural Foundation, 5.72 acre pareel-located at 20605 Verde Vista Lane, to change General Plan Designation frcm Private Open Space to Mediam Density Residential~~ public hearing held 5/5J82). Passed 5-0. MOYLES/MALIDRY MOVED TO APPRDVE RESOLtFION 2003 APPROVING GSlqERAL PlAN kMENDMENTS 82-1-B, 82-1-C, 82-1-D, and 82-1-E. Passed 5-0. 'M{~17~E~.~~ cu~,,ented that sh~ had reservations on the Brookview approval, and CouncilmemberY~M~tul~'~- stated that ~he had reservations on the process that had been foiio~.~ The Council then recessed from 9:15 to 9:35. 4-8/4/82 B. A~beal regarding SD 1521 and 1522, Gerald Butler, applicant/ appellant (Denial of tentative subdivision approval - 8 lots Lira Dr. (access from Lira Dr. and emergency access to Vickery Ave. ); and denial of Negative Declaration and tentative subdivision approval - 6 lots - LSma Dr. and ~bntalvo Rd. ) Associate Planner Kerdus explained issues and re~6rted on aklditions-~ad~ to the conditions listed in the staff report as follows: SD 1522 SubmitS. irrevocable offer of dedication to provide for a '50' right of way on Lira Dr. and 25' half street on Montalvo Rd. Widen- remaining sections of Montalvo Rd. between Lira Dr. 'and Saratoga/Los Gatos Rd. to provide a 26' paved area to City standards. Prior to final approval, suhni~ CC&R's which include a private road maintenance agreement. Prior to final approval, comply with 7 mitigations listed on' letter by Gerald D. Butler received 8/4/82. SD 1521 Suki~it irrevocable offer of dedication to provide' for a 50' right of way on Lira Dr. frcm Montalvo to tract beundary. Subnit irrevocable off~er<, of dedication to provide 40' right of way for streets within tract. Improve Lira Dr. from Montalvo Rd. and all interior streets to City standards, including the following: 1. Designed structural section 13' centerline and flowline 2. P.C. Concrete ~urb and gutter (R136) ' 3. Undergrounding existing Overhead utilities. Prior to f/hal approval, subnit CC&R's which include a private r= ~ ~'~ froad maintenance agreement. " Widen reining sections of Montalvo' Rd. between Lira Dr. 'and Saratoga-Los Gatos Ra. to-provide a 26"paved area to City standards. Prior to final approval, comply with 7 mitigations listed on letter by Gerald D. Butler received 8/4/82. The public hearing was opened at 9:45 p.m. Harry Lalor .spoke as a representative of Ruth and Going,' Mr. Butler' s engineering firm. He explained why he felt that Mr. Butler' s subdivisions should be approved, since his previous maps had been approved, and Mr. Butler had agreed to mitigate any impacts. David Smith spoke as Mr. Butler's attorney. He ~xplained the details of Mr. Butler' s concessions as agreed to in a meeting with nearby hemeowners and suhnitted a letter fr~n Mr. Butler dated August 4 agreeing to them. Jack Christian, 20230 Bonnie B~ae, spoke as a representative of a con- cerned group of Montalvo-Mendelsohn hc~eowners. He expressed concern over the traffic and other inpacts and suggested that Mr. Butler consolidate several lots so that there would be a total of T lots in order to further minimize impacts. Leo Shortino, 15252 Montalvo, spoke against the subdivision, stating that the traffic patterns needed further study. - Bill Ziebron, an urban planning consultant, inquired as to whether Council- member Fanelli had had business with the applicant in he~ professi6nalf capacity. CounCilmenber Fanelli replied ~he had had no business with the firm since she had been employed by her pre~e_nt fhnn; she w6u]a have reroved herself from the discussion if she had felt there was any conflict of interest. City Attorney stated that he saw no'apparent conflict. 5-8/4/82 Mr. Ziebron then stated he felt the traffic impacts needed further study, as well as the impact of possible additional develol~nent in the area., He comnented that since the City did not "have a Housing Elenent," the Council could not make the required finding of consistency ~ith~he General Plan. Fred King, 15159 Montalvo, spoke against the subdivision, saying that he had net been consulted as to the concessions made by Mr. Butler. He believed the Planning Cc~mission disapproved the subdivision because of traffic impacts, and the Council should do the same. Bill Smith qt~stioned whether the subdivisions were consistant with the General Plan and whether the cul-de-sac was too long. Do~ Call, 3930 Montalvo, spoke against the circulation plan, saying that his area was being asked to serve what was behind Vickery. Margaret Dennis, 20201 Hill Avenue, opposed the subdivisions, saying that Montalvo was holding more events, which increased traffic, and there was more property to be developed. Harry Lalor rose again to state that the additional conditions listed by Associate Planner Kerdns were acceptable to Mr. Butler and to assert that the roads would acoonmodate the traffic planned for them. Jack Christian rose again to reoonme_nd putting a moratori~n on building in the area. Mr. Butler rose again, to2 state,,that he would~ .r~t ~ynsider~ consolidating lots as suggested by Mr. Christian. He also stated the cul-de-sac was no longer than was legal. He asserted that a~ many' as 32 lots l.could not be developed in the area, although sc~e might he developed in an area about one mile away. The public hearing was closed at 10:35 p.m. Council deliberated on issues. City Attorney stated that Saratoga has a Housing Element in effect now and another in process; the proposed subdivisions are in accord with beth. Councilmember Moyles stated he did not wish to render judgment, since he felt the Planning CuL,~ssion ought to hear the issue again on referral without prejudice frc~n the City Council. He believed the EIR ought to he updated and the Planning C~n~L.~ssion vote on the matter as a 7-member body. FANELI,I/MALLORY FOVID TO APPROVE NEGATIVE DECLARATICN ON SD 1522. Passed 4-1 (Moyles opposed). FANMLT,T/MALLORY MOVt~ TO APPROVE APPEAL OONDITION~D UPON OONCF-qSIONS AGBw:w:~, UPON Ilq BU?LER L~I'I'ER OF 8J4/82 (1-7) AND CONDITIONS IN STAFF REPORT, AS AM~qDBD 8/4/82, AN~ MAKING THE APPROPRIATE FINDINGS. Passed 4-1 (Moyles opposed). Mayor Callon then returned to itemins preceding public hearings on the agenda. IV. PETITIONS, ORDINANCES, AND RESOLLFIONS (continued) C. Ordinance amending Sections 2.3a, 3.3a, 5.3a and 6.5a of Ordinance NS 3, the Zoning Ordinance, by allowing privat~"~h~'whether.' '- they are proEit-making or not, to operate in A, R-1/R-M and P-A Districts upon receipt of a use permit (second reading) CALLON/MDYLES FDVED TO READ BY TITLE ONLY, WAIVING FURTHER READING, ADOPT. Passed 5-0.. D. Res6tution consenting to modification of site development plan for Tr. 6531, Ranche Bella Vista - T. Lerone, and amendment to CC&R's MALLORYyFANET,T,I MDV~D TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2004 WITH ADDITION OF PARAGRAPH FOLLOWING CONDITION #2 AS CONDITION #3. Passed 5-0. 6-8/4/82 MayOr Callon then proceeded to items fol.lowing public hearings on. the agenda. VI. BIDS AND CONTRACTS A. Authorization for Advertising for bids, Village Library Renovation Councilmembers discussed issues, and Councilmember Mallory cc~l~e~ted that the next tenant for the library might not approve of the improvements, and if the improvements wore not m~e the City could earn interest on the funds o CLEV~qGER/MALLORY MDVED TO AUTHORIZE ~DVERTISING FOR BIDS FOKTHWITH AND TO P~ ~:~:D WIT~ f~ P~DPOSED WORK. Passed 4-1. (Mallory. opposed). Peggy Corr rose to cc~ment on the need to work out lease agreements wi~h the tenants. B. ContraCt for Law Enforce~uent Services with ~anta Clara County MALLORY/CALLON MOVED TO APP~DVE AG~Fn~M~qT. Passed 5-0. VII. CONSENT C~Lk~qDAR CLEVENGER~FANRT.Li WOVt'3) TO APPNDVE AND ADOPT CONSENT C~L~NDAR. Passed 5-0. A. Denial of Claim - G. H o Wood B. Acceptance' of'~donation~ for'Cui~Uunity Libra~ C. Report on Teledyne MEC - Foot Race - 8/8/82 D. Report on C(mrnunity FOOtrace and Seventeenth Annual Fall Parede - 9/19/82 Resolution 2005 E. Approval of Warrant List VIII. ADFLINISTRAT~.IVE C~'-S~..'," MAYOR C LLON/ mLe TO SUB m OF CO SS:ON Passed 5-0. CLEV~XqGER/H~LLORY ~XJVED TO ~PPOIIqT RICHARD SIEGFR~:~> TO THE PL~iNNI~G COI~ilSSION TO FTT,T, THE UNEXPlbC~D TEP~I'.'OKfEIJG~XqE;Z~i~t~I'I'i kNq3 TO RF~PFOIlg~ ~ UPON EXP~ION OF THaT 'i'~F~i IN J~'0A~ 1983~ TO ~PPOINT G~EG NET.T.IS TO FTLL THE UNEXPIRED ~Et~t OF VIRGINL~ L~D~N F~I~.T.I THI~3UGH J~I~U~R~ 1984. Passed 5-0. MayOr Callon reported that the Council bad made ~ policy decision to retain the applications of trDse whe had applied for these vacancies and, if any more vacancies occurred through Ja~ry~ 1983, to aFpoint an individual from am3ng thDse applicants. CONSENSUS TO C~NC~.T. STU3Y SESSION 8/24. MayOr Calloh ~oted that Council had ~ receiving additional materials on agenda it~us the night of the meeting and suggested a policy statement that the CounCil would rot ac~c on important ib~s where materials are received late. Councfln~auber ~byles cOncurred. CONSENSUS TO T~KE UP ISSL~ OF TRAFFIC CONTROL IN SL~v~qER~ERICKSBURG ~ AT STUDY SESSION ON K'Di~_TE._:TOSBEJ~ORKED OUT BY B. COLYNCIL ~ CO~J~SSION REFOi~PS Fanelli reported she would attend the Finance ~n~visery Corm~fttce 8/5. She stated she could not attend the next Flood Control tdvisery C~l.~ttce meetLug, and City Manager was directed to have a staff member attend. 7-8/4/82 Mallory reported that the League of California Cities Peninsula Division Meeting had gone well and encouraged other Councilmembers to attend. MayDr Callon cu~,Lented that he had been voted in as first Vice President of the Division. C. DEPARTMENT HEADS AND OFFICERS 1. City Attorney a. Tentative Map SD 1355, Tr. 6781, Heber Teerlink (Gerard and Lambert, Inc_.) MALIDRYyFAN~T.7.I MOVED TO DIRECT CITY ATIO~N~EY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE TO BR/NG SECTION 18.2 OF THE SUBDM SION ORDIlqANCE INTO CONFORMITY WiTH SECTION 66452.6 OF THE G0E CODE AND TO DIRECT THAT THE NEWLY- ADOPI'~U TIME PERIOD WOULD BE APPLICABLE TO ALL SUBDIVISIONS THAT HAVE BRRN"APPRDV~D AS W~.I. AS THOSE IN THE FUTURE: TIME PERIOD WOULD BE 24 MONTHS INITIALLY WiTH THE POSSIBILITY OF E)~I'~/~DING 24 MOEq~HS. Passed 5-0. 2. Cu~nunity Develol~nent Director a. State Bicycle Program Report noted. D. CITY MANAGER Written C~,~,unication #3 requesting waiver of fees for planter box sign by Steven Walker was brought up. OONStIqSUS NOT TO WAIVE ~'n~S; CITY MANA~ WAS DIRECI'~D TO RESPOND. Councilmenber Mallory brought up an IGC matter concern/rig a' County Ct~cn_rter Amendment .which!~Duld strengthen the language governing the role of the Board of Supervisors; he suggested {he City of Sunnyvale he supported in the matter. There was no consensus' to take a position. MayDr Callon brought up another IGC agenaa itam concerning tariffs on imported roses. There was no consensus to take a position. The meeting was adjourned at 11:50 p.m. Respectfully suk~nitted, Grace; E. Cory Deputy City Clerk