HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-06-1984 City Council Minutes SAPATOGA CITY COUNCIL
TIME: Wednesday, June 6, 1984 - 7:00 pmu
PLACE: Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue
TYPE: Regular Meeting
I. ORGANIZATION
P~ ROlL CALL - Councilmembers Clevenger, Fanelli, Mallory and Mayor Moyles
present at 7:10 p.m.; Councilmember Callon present at 7:11 p.m.
B. MINUTES- 5/16
FANRr,T,T/MOYLES MOVtD TO APPROVE MINUTES AS S~TI'ED. Passed 5-0.
II. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Akos Szoboszlay spoke against the proposed County-wide 1/2 cent sales tax and urged
the Council to oppose it.
III. CONSENT CAr.k~ND/tR
A. Denial of Claim - Vander Putten {by Wilhelm)
B. Denial of Claim - San Jose Water Co. (by Pinelli in connection with 21139
Michaels Drive )
C. Resolution concerning California CowBelles Beef COok-Off Day sponsored by Mayor
RESOLUTION 2149
D. Final Building Site Approval, SDR 1503, Motel/Hotel, 4th St. end Big Basin
Way, Oudewaal/Galeb
Final Building Site Approval, SDR 1542, Public Storage, Saratoga-Sunnyvale
Read
F. Resolution Upholding Decision of Planning Cosmission denying Design
Review ~pproval for A-950 heard 5/16/84 (Applicant/appellant, Parnas Corp.)
RESOLUTION 2150
G. Treasurer's Report - ~pril
H, ~pproval of Warrant List
F~Ivcr.I.T/CALI/)N MOVED APPROVAL OF ENTIRE CONSENT CAr.~DAR, Passed 5,0.
1. Proposed Budget for 1984-85
City Manager explained proposed budget, and Mayor Moyles noted that the Council bad
discussed deleting the $500 decrease in the Sister City budget and decreasing the
Sheriff's contract amount by $19,200. Councilmember Mallory expressed his concern
about the ability of staff to handle policy analysis; s~pport for police mana~_nt;
his hope that road maintenance budget would be funded with capital funds.
FANELI.T/MOI~LES MOV~I) TO AMEND EXBIBIT II TO SHOW FIVE ITEMS: $50,810 D~ZREASE FUR
SUPPORT TO COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES; $39,415 II~E TO PERMIT REVIEN; $5,897 I,~ZRFASE
TO t/tNDSCAP~D M~DIAN M~i~'i'~.'.~NCE; $5,897 INCRF/~E TO NEIGHBOPJ~D P~,R~S MAI~rb~CE# AND
$19,200 D~E TO SHERIFP'S CONTPJ~CT. Passed 5-0.
C~,EVENGER/MOYLF. q MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2151 ~DOPTING THE 1984-85 BUDGET. Passed
5-0,
2. Agre~nent for Settlement of Vogel et al. vs. Saratoga
2-6/6/84
Mr. Toppel of the City Attorney's Office explained the proposed settlement.
Councilmember Mallory felt the number of lots granted exceeded that in the original
map.
MOYr.~.q/FAbrg~.T.T MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2152 APPROVING THE S~'.'j'~,EMI~qT WITH THE
PROVISION THAT IT BE WITHDRAWN IF NOT SIGNED WITHIN TEN DAYS BY ALL PARTIES. Passed
5-0.
3. Agreement for Set'tl~'a~L of T~vii~5~ e~ al. vs. Saratoga
Mr. Toppel explained the proposed settlement. Councilmember Mallory opposed the
agreement because he felt it went beyond the intention of the Specific Plan by
adding lots in exchange for public improvements. Councilmember Clevenger ounmented
that the agreement was the best comprc~nise which could be worked out under the
circnanstances.
FANEr.I.I/MOYLES MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2153 APPROVING THE S~'1'3'~ .RMENT AGREMRRNT.
Passed 4-1 (Mallory Opposed).
B. REPORTS FROM O0bgaISSIONS AND COMM1TI'k~ig
1. Report frem Councilmember Clevenger Regarding Hakone Foundation
Councilmember Clevenger reported on progress of Hakone Foundation and asked Council
to authorize further action.
FANELI,I/CLEVENGER MOVED TO REQUEST THAT BILL GLENNON PREPARE THE APPROPRIATE LEGAL
DOCUMENTS TO ESTABLISH THE HAKONE EDUNDATION. Passed 5-0.
2.Report frem Planning Ccrmnission to Modify CC&R's for Tr. 6526 and 6528
( Parker Ranch )
Planner Kerdus explained request to modify CC&R'S, noting that this was expected to
be the last amendment allowing more lots to have swi_nm~ing pools. In answer to
Councilmember Callon, Bill Heiss, who had suk~itted the request, stated that about
50% of the lots would have pools if the amendment were allowed. Councilmember
Callon also c~tit~ented that the original concept was to restriot individual pools and
encourage cuLa~,unity facilities.
FAN'RI.I,~/MOYLES MOV~I) TO APPROVE AGENDA BILL 649 RECOMMENDING MODIFICATION TO CC&R'S.
Passed 5-0.
C. ORDINAI~-q AND REBOIJ3TIONS
1. Second Unit Ordinance (second reading)
Mr. Toppel explained the ordinanc~ Mayor Moyles and Councilmember Callon moved and
seconded to read the ord/nance by title only, waiving further reading. (Clerk's
note: The motion was not voted upon and was later withdrawn_)
Councilmember Fanelli brought up the possibility of allowing the legalization of
existing second units in the R-1-10,000 district under the san~ conditions as in
other districts. She felt the ordinance as written was punitive, since it required
cu,~liance without providing a method for c~npliance in that district.
CouncilKember Clevenger felt that the decision that second units should not be
allowed on such small lots had been reached after much discussion, and it was an
appropriate decision; Councilmember Mallory agreed. After further discussion, the
motion to read the ordinance by title only was withdrawru
MOYLES/CALLON MOVED TO CONTINUE THE ITEM TO THE NEXT Fm~TING, WITH THE PROPOSED
AM~lqD~14T ~D BE PIE{SICALLY AT]IACH~D TO THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE, AND WITH NOTICE TO
;xl.l. TIEE GROUPS %~[IClt HAD PREVIOUSLY PARTICIPATED. Passed 3-2 (Clevenger, Mallory
~l. upposed). .
., 2. Revision to OrOinance NS-3, subsection 13~7(a) (7), Design Review Of
· ru2sidential Structures (C-208) (second reading)
F~DYIJ~/CLL'qE-~li~I :.:OVID 'iD ?j~MD ORD1N;e4CE NS 3.57 BY TITLE ONLY, WAIVING FURTHER
READINS. Passed 5-0. ·
3-6/6/84
MOYLF. q/FAIqMLLT MOVED TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NS 3.57. Passed 5-0.
3. Garbage Disposal Ordinance (first reading)
City Manager explained proposed ordinance. Councilmember Clevenger asked about the
status of the appeal process, and City Manager stated that there was already an
informal appeal process, because citizens could petition for relief frGn the City
Council, which could then direct interpretation of the ordinance. Councilmember
Clev~nge_r ~ she w~,~ ~ .... ~v ,.,~h ~ n~,, ~a~nager to develop a more formal appeal
process.
Councilmember Mallory asked whether mandatory service had been enforced in the past,
and City Manager replied that it had not, and that about 400 out of 10,000 possible
subscribers did not pay for service. Councilmember Mallory stated his belief that
if mandatory service were to be enforced, after it had not been enforced in the
past, a public hearing should have been held.
MOYT.F-q/CLEVENGER MOV[D TO RFAD ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLY, WAIVING FURTHER READING.
Passed 5-0.
MOYLES/Cr.RVENGER MOVED TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE AS READ BY TITLE. Passed 4-1 (Mallory
opposed ).
4. Transient OCcupancy Tax Ordinance (second reading)
Mayor Moyles suggested this item be discussed under Item V. A.
5. Business License Tax Ordinance (first reading)
Mayor Moyles suggested that this item also be discussed under Item V.A.
D. BIDS AND CONTRACTS
1. Pierce Read Tandslide Repair - Appropriations Resolution and Notice of
Campletion
City Manager stated that the approval of contracts and the appropriations were done
in separate sequences, so that the amount appropriated did not match the amount
approved in contracts. He recc~nended that the Notice of C~'eletion be approved and
the appropriations resolution adopted. Councilmember Callon asked why the amount of
the contract appeared to have doubled. Senior Building Inspector Harison explained
the sequence of events, noting that the final cost was cc~parable to a similar
emergency project in the area. He also stated that the field investigation and
the design were awarded at a specific price, but the field inspection was approved
through warrants. After further discussion, there was consensus to continue the
item to the next study session for action at the next regular meeting.
CLF~;ENGER/FAkn~.T.T MOVED TO AUTHORIZE FILING OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION.. FOR CONTRACT
WITH PACIFIC GENERAL ENGIN~:~:~ING. Passed 4-1 (Moyles opposed).
V. PURr.TC HEARINGS
A. Consideration of Special Tax for Read Maintenance (continued frem 5/16)
City Manager explained proposed tax, and Mr. Toppel of the City Attorney's Office
explained the State provisions for tax relief for seniors, noting that those
provisions would apply to the tax under consideration. He also stated there were no
legal problens with maj_ntaining a split roll separating cu,,,ercial and residential
properties. The public hearing was opened at 8:30 pm~
F. T. Barco of Camino Barco spoke in favor of the tax, urging public input and
predicting a favorable public response.
Dale MacIntyre, President of the Brockview Hc~eowners Association, stated that there
had been a change in public opinion on the tax. He felt citizens wanted the money
to be spent only for street improvements and suggested a citizens' cGTmittee to
oversee expenditures. No one further appearing to speak, the public hearing was
closed at 8:37 p.m.
Council discussed issues. There was consensus to insert a provision noting the
4-6/6/84
availability of tax relief for seniors.
MOYLES/FANRTI~ MOVED TO DELETE THE SECOND AND TIIIRD SENTENCES IN PARAGRAPH 6.B., AS
W~T.T. AS THE FIRST THREE WORDS OF THE NEXT SENTENCE. Passed 4-1 (Mallory opposed).
(Clerk's note: Deletion of these sentence removed the provision for a special tax
collection which would have been several months sooner than the regular collection. )
Councilmember Mallory said he preferred to begin the tax collection as soon as
possible.
MOYT,F,q,/FANRLT,T MOVED TO DET,~rI'E THE SEEOND SENTENCE IN PARAGRAPH 6.A. Passed 5-0.
(Clerk's note: Deletion of this sentence changed the date a lien would attach,
since a regular rather than a special billing was contemplated. )
Mayor Moyles brought up the possibility of charging an amount not to exceed $100 for
residential parcels ($80 the first year) and an amount not to exceed $200 for
c~m~ercial parcels ($160 the first year). Councilmembers discussed the definitions
of "cc~nercial" end "residential." There was consensus to delay introducing the
ordinance until the City Attorney could write the.proposed definitions and other
provisions.
FANF~.I.I/CAT.TON MOVED TO DIRECT CITY ATTORNEY TO RE-WRITE ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION
ACCORDING TO COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF AMENDMENTS. Passed 5-0.
The Council recessed fron 9:11 p.m. to 9:36 p.m.
B. Protest Hearing for Existing Landscaping and Lighting District ILA-1
Mayor Moyles read the opening statement and declared the public hearing open at 9:36
p~m Deputy Cty Clerk read a statement verifying that the affidavit of publication
and certificate of posting the resolution of intention were on file. Assistant
Civil Engineer explained proposed assessments. Deputy City Clerk stated that there
were no written protests. No one appearing to speak, the public hearing was closed
at 9:42 p.m.
MOYT,F.q/CALLON MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2138-D OVERRULING PROTESTS AND ORDERING THE
IMPROVEMENTS AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT. Passed 5-0.
C. Protest Hearing for Annexation to T~ndScaping and Lighting District LLA-1
Mayor Moyles read the opening statement and declared the public hearing open at 9:43
pa Deputy City Clerk read a statement verifying that the affidavit of publication
and certificate of mailing the resoution of intention were on file. Assistant Civil
Engineer explained proposed assessments. Deputy City Clerk stated that no written
protests had been received.
Andrew Beverett, 19597 Via Monte, spoke in favor of the annexation.
Robert Cross, 13132 Via Madronas, also spoke in favor of the annexation. He
mentioned that the hcmeowners association steering cuL~,~ttee had r~ceived a protest
letter and presented it to the City Council. Deputy City Clerk noted that the
letter was fron Mrs. John N. Denny, 13250 Via Arriha. Mr. Cross stated that the
hcmLoowners association had invited responses from all homeowners affected, and Mrs.
Denny's letter was the only negative response.
No one further appearing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 9:59 p.m.
FANRT.T.Y/CAILON MOVtD TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2137-D OVERRULING PROTESTS A~D ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO AN EXISTING ASSESSMjlNT DISTRICT, ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS
AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMt.IqTo Passed 5-0.
D. Appeal of Denial of Variance at 14016 Camino Barco (Appellant/applicant,
G. and E. MoLaughlin) (V-636) · ,
Planner Kerdus explained history of appeal. The public hearing was opened at 10:04
p.m.
Glen McLaughlin, 14016 Camino Barco, spoke as the appellant He stated that his lot
was irregular, so that the extension into the setback did not impact the neighbors'
privacy. The irregular lot also required that the house be one story in front and
two story in hack, which was an exceptional circumstance. He felt that having a
5-6/6/84
deck adjacent to the living areawas a ccr~non privilege and would relievethe
monotony of the rear elevation. He stated that all the neighbors agreed except for
one owner of property which could not be seen frcmthe site. Mr. McLaughlin then
pointed outthe location of the site end the neighbors on a mapand explained
further details of the design in answer to Councilmembers' questions. No one
further appearing to speak, the public hearing was closedat 10:18
~ouncihnemt~r Fanelli stated that she had visited the site and could notmake the'
findings for the variance; she could see the site frcm the read end the neighbor's
hack yard. CoancilmemberCallon also stated that she could not makethe findings.
Mayor Moyles requested that Planning Cu~,~assioner Joyce Hlava give the Council her
opinioru Cu~lassioner Hlava stated that one of the main considerations was that the
existing width on the back of the house was already present in the setback, as
opposed to building sc~nething to intrude further into the setback.
Councilmember Clevenger stated that if no one objected there seemed to be no reason
to deny it, and CouncilmemberMalloryalso felt it was difficult to deny. Mayor
Moyles believed the proposal couldmitigate the design problem andmeet the objectives of
the district as well. Council discussed the findings to be made and those which had
previously beenmadebythe Planning Cul~L'dssion.
CLEVENGER/MOYLESMOVED TO GRANTTHEAPPEAL. Passed 3-2 (Callon, Fanelli opposed).
As to the findings, Mayor Moyles referred staff to the applicant's letter and the
staff report in which findings were made to grant the existing halcony.
F_ Appeal of Tentative SubdivisionApproval for 36 Lots at Brookview School
Site, 12301 Radoyka Dr. (Appellant, ~ and I~ Burden; applicant, Morelend School
District (SD 1554)
Planner Kerdus explained the appeal, and the public hearing was opened at 10:38 p.m.
Chris Everett spoke as a representative of the Park Woods Hcxne~wnersAssociation
and the Burdens, the appellents. He requested that all activities relating to
development of the sitebe restricted to the primary access route, with the
seooDa~ry access restricted to all except emergency traffic. He believed there
would be traffic problems with the proposed intersection and suggested mitigation
measures. In answer to Mayor Moyles, he statedthat residents would not expect
negative impact if traffic in the are were decreased.
Jim Russell, 12776 Saratoga Glen Court, spoke as president of the hc~ecwners
association. He stated that there was no intention of cc~plyingwith the mitigation
measures. He felt thatanad hooc~L~atteeshouldbeinvolvedinthe planing of the
project. Councilmember Fanelli stated thatthe conditions would be recorded so that
they would not be lost. In addition, she said, there would be design review of the
project. Mayor Moyles requested that the homeowners associationbe given special
notice of any public hearing on the matter.
Ray Sinpson; 12300 Radoyka, requested that Obrad Dn r~tkeclosed; he did not feel that
Radoyka should absorb all the traffic.
Bob Reasoner, Superintendent of the Moreland School District, stated that he
supported any adjustments in the construction process desired by the residents.
Mayor Moyles suggested that he might wish to set up an independent ccmnitteeto keep
in touch with the hc~ecwners. Mr. Reasoner pointed out that the school district no
longer has any direct responsibility for the site, but stated he would be glad to
land suppert to the hcm~<7~ners.
Jerry Lohr spoke as a representative of Saratoga Foothills Development Corporation.
He explained the conditions placed on the .subdivision and expressed willingness to
meet with the hc~eowners if they wished.
Planner Kerdus explained that City purchase of park at E1 Quito would mitigatethe
environmental impact of the development to sc~eextent, so thattheCouncil could
make the findings to approve the project.
In answer to Councilmember Clevenger, Mr. Simpson stated thatthe neighbors had not
reviewed the plan, as far as he knew.
6-6/6/84
No one further appearing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 11:11 p.m.
Councilmembers discussed various methods of mitigating traffic impacts. As to the
suggestion of a stop sign, Councilmember Fanelli felt it best not to place a stop
sign on a project that has not been built; if a stop sign.proved necessary, it could be
addressed later.
FAN~.LI/MOYLES MOV~) TO ~<TIFY THE FINAL EIR AS ADEQUATE, ACKlqOWLEDGING THAT TEE..
PROJECT WILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE ~qVIRONMENT. Passed 5-0.
FANRLLT/MOYLES MOVe) TO DENY APPEAL ON CONDITION THAT OBRAD DRIVE BE CLOSED DLE{ING
CONSTRUCTION BUT OPENED AS A REGULAR ACc~-qS ROAD AFI'~ COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
Passed 4-1 (Clevenger opposed).
Councilmember Clevenger stated that she opposed' the motion because she felt Obrad
should not be a regular access rood; she felt it should be used only for energency
access.
MALLORY/cr.RVENG~ MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION TO MAKE O~RAD DRIVE EMERGENCY ACCESS
ONLY. Failed 2-3 (Callon, Fanelli, Moyles opposed).
Councilmember Mallory'excused himself at 11:29 end left the meeting; Mayor Moyles
left the meeting temporarily.
F. Rezoning frown R-M-4000 to R-M-3000 at 14234 Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd.
(Applicant, MOrrison end Fox) (C-206) (first reading)
Assistant Planner Flores explained the applicatiom The public hearing was opened
at 11:34 pj~ No one appearing to speak, it was closed at 11:35 p.m.
Councilmembers discussed issues, including whether a EIR should be required rather
than a negative declaration, since impacts were possible due to a possible increase
· of twelve units. Assistant Planner explained that in his judgment impacts would not
be significant even with a 12-unit increase because not enough daily trips would be
generated to cause impact_ Councilmember Fenelli noted that high density in the
Village area was called for by the General Plen. In answer to Councilmember
Clevenger, Assistant Planner stated that if there appeared to be a problem with the ·
project being too close to the creek, staff would consult with the water district
for conditions to be imposed. It appeared, he said, that only five or six units
could be granted without variences.
FANRLT.I/~ER MOV~ APPROVAL OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Passed 3-0 (Mallory,
MOyles absent.
CAT.TON/MOYLES MOVED TO READ THE ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLY, WAIVING FURTHER READING.
Passed 4-0 (Mallory absent).
CALTON/FAN~.r.T MOV~] TO INTRODUCE THE ORDINANCE AS READ BY TITLE ONLY. Passed 3-1
(Clevenger opposed, Mallory absent).
Councilmamber Clevenger stated that she opposed the project because it appeared that
the developer would crowd the units end add second stories in order not to approach
too close to the cree~
Councilmember Callon noted that the maps which had been sut~nitted were simply
exhibits provided by the applicant and have no connection with the rezoning.
G. Amendment to Text of Article 4A (PC Planned Ccmmtunity District) of the
Zoning Ordinance (C-207) (first reading)
ASsistant Planner Flores explained the proposed amendment. The public hearing was
opened. at 11:46 p.m.
Ken Riding spoke as a representative of the AM Cc~pany, which had a contract to
purchase the Teresi property. He stated that his company had met with various
interested groups ~ had their support. He favored the ordinance because he
believed the flexibility it would provide was needed. No One further appearing to
speak, the public hearing was closed at 11:47 p.n~
Councilmember Fanelli pointed out that if the Council approved the rezoning that did
7-6/6/84
not imply that they approved the project.
FANEII.T/MOYI.F.q MOVED TO APPROVE THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Passed 4-0.
CALLON/MOYI.F.q MOVED TO READ THE ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLY, WAIVING FURTHER READING.
Passed 4-0.
CALLON/MOYLES MOVED TO INTRODUCE THE ORDINANCE AS READ BY TITLE. Passed 4-0.
VI. NEq BUSINESS
A. Discussion of Oral C~,~Lonications, if any - None.
B. Written Cul~lLonications frGnthe Public
#1 frcm IAFCO urging that staff be supported in returningmaterial concerning
Spheres of Influence - to be discussed at study session.
#2 frc~D. Bruce requesting that Council not support EIS on Guadalupe Corridor
light rail project - notedand filed. Mayor Moyles, recognizing that Mr. Bruce
had been waiting for several hours, allowed himto speak. He requested that the
Council re-examine the EIS, which he stated was j_naccurate. Mayor Moyles stated
that the Council would probably state its position in connection withthe
Alternatives Analysis process at a later time.
#3 from S. Price resigning from Parks and Recreation Cu:~,dssion - resignation
accepted and staff directed to advertise for this vacancyas well as vacancy on
Plann/ng Cu~m~ssion due to Hlava's election to Council and to prepare resolutions
for resigning cu,~,dssioners; previous applicants for position to be interviewed.
#4 from~ and J. Martel requestingmoratorium on building permits for Saratoga
Hills Water Zone referred to staff; Cc~munityDevelopment Director to request San
Jose Water Company for letter of intent with a copy to Chief Kraule. Mr. Martel
was allowed to speak and gave further details of the water pressure problem.
#5 from ~ Barrett opposing construction in connectionSwith Highway 85 noted and
filed; letter to become part of Alternatives Analysis file.
#6 from ~ Lehnen requesting information about assaults in Saratoga - City Manager
to reply.
#7 from % Clark expressing concerning about an experience with Building Department
- City Manager to edit report and make appropriate response.
#8 frc~nMrs. O. W. Ferris requesting noise test - referred to staff for reply.
#9 frc~ M. Houde requesting information about Proposition 24 - City Manager to
acknowledge.
#10 from W. Notz requesting council to contct Supervisor Morgan to place Sunland
Park in 5th supervisorial district - City Manager towrite Morgan with a copy to
I2~FCO asking them how to make change before November.
#11 fromnine residents objecting to garbage rate increases of up to 350% and
elimination of single can service - noted and filed.
#12 fromthree cities expressing their position on the proposed 1/2 cent sales tax
for hig._hway improvements - noted and filed.
#13 from two citizens opposing above tax - noted and filed.
#14 from three residents supporting stoplight at Herrimanand Highway 85 - referred
to Public Safety Comission.
C. New Business from Councilmembers
CouncilmemberCallon inquiredas to the status of certainCity investments. Finance
Director stated that one of the institutions with which the City invested had been
taken over byanother institution and that theprincipal was coveredby insurance in
any case.
D. New Business from Staff, Administrative Reports not Scheduled
Deputy City Clerk submitted a memo recommending adjournment of the meeting to June
19 f6r the purpose of declaring the results of the election and swearing in new
councilmembers.
City Manager inquired as to Council's preference as to holding the regular meeting
which would fall on July 4. There was consensus to cancel the meeting.
City Manager brought up the question of vacation schedules, and-there was cqnsensus
to discuss it at a study session. Other scheduling matters were also discussed.
Deputy City Clerk requested that Councilmembers who had not brought in their cedes
8-6/6/84
for updating do so.
VII. ADJOURNM~qT
The meeting was adjourned at 12:21'a.m. to June 19.
Respectfully sukmitted,
Grace E. Cory
Deputy City Clerk