HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-12-1988 City Council Minutes MINUTES
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
TIME: Tuesday, July 12, 1988
PLACE: Community Center, 19655 Allendale Avenue
TYPE: Adjourned Regular Meeting
The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m.
Roll Call: Peterson, Stutzman, Clevenger, Anderson present; Moyles
absent.
The City Council met to interview prospective members of the Nelson
Foundation Property Options Task Force in the Senior Day Care Center.
Following interviews, the Council adjourned to the Community Center
and reconvened at 7:50 p.m.
Teen Activities
The Council discussed with students from Saratoga of junior and
senior high school age the kinds of activities, facilities, programs
and organizations they would like to see the City support in the
future. Several students from Redwood Junior High School presented
the results of a survey taken by the students on desired activities
and programs. A copy of the survey results was received and made a
part of the record of the meeting.
Among the ideas discussed for City consideration were:
1. Activities planned for Friday and Saturday nights.
2. A once a month Friday night junior high night at the
Community Center with pizza, games, movies.
3. An all-cities dance where schools from surrounding
communities are invited to attend.
4. An open night at the high school gym.
5. Programs which would involve volunteer fund raisers and
community service projects.
6. A kids-type restaurant - a place where kids could dance
which serves food. City should encourage the creation of such a
place.
7. A place where kids could skateboard on a regular basis.
8. Kids need a place to go and hang out where it will be O.K.
to do so.
The Council discussed the idea of creating a Youth Commission to
plan, organize and promote events, activities, and programs and
provide the City with a teen perspective of what's going on in the
City.
It was generally agreed that the Commission should be limited to
about 25 members, that teens should be nominated to serve through
signing of a petition by their peers, probably requiring 20 names to
nominate. While it was felt it would be good to get representation
from as many schools as possible, probably no limit should be placed
on membership from any one school. It was generally felt that if
there were to be any adult members they should be limited to very few
people, such as youth ministers from local churches.
Recreation staff will work over the summer to set up procedures for
forming the Youth Commission so that work can begin as soon as school
opens in September.
Update of Strategic Plan for Measure A Program
Will Kempton, Executive Director of the Santa Clara County Traffic
Authority, briefed the City Council on the proposed update of the
Authority's Strategic Plan for the Measure A projects to be con-
sidered by the Authority on August 8, 1988. Vice-Mayor Clevenger
noted several errors in the draft report in reference to Saratoga
which Mr. Kempton noted and agreed to have corrected.
In reference to changes in median widths along Route 85, Mr. Kempton
indicated that the median from Winchester southerly to Almaden will
be 48 feet instead of 46 feet and 70 feet wide at various interchange
locations to better accommodate future mass transit as proposed by
the T2000 document. One of the key reasons why the final EIS on the
Route 85 project.was given clearance by the Federal Highway
Administration was because of the air quality enhancement that
commuter lanes and reserving the median for future mass transit would
create.
Councilman Peterson asked to be excused from t.he meeting at this
point.
Mr. Kempton related the status of discussions with Cupertino, San
Jose and Los Gatos regarding interchanges and their possible
configuration at Rainbow, Prospect, Winchester and Bascom. While it
is likely there will be a full interchange at Rainbow, it is also
likely it will have a diamond configuration, limiting its capacity to
handle high traffic volumes successfully. If there is a diamond
interchange at Rainbow, then a one-half interchange at Prospect to
the north is questionable, but so far San Jose has not committed to
any specific configuration at either location, although they have
signed a freeway agreement.
The Council asked about having models prepared for all three proposed
Saratoga interchanges. Mr. Kempton indicated that it would probably
be better to build a model of the entire freeway through Saratoga and
would try to have the model complete by the end of September.
In response to questions about San Jose's position on a Quito inter-
change, Mr. Kempton stated that San Jose has no interest in a partial
interchange, and no interchange at that location is contained in the
San Jose freeway agreement.
Ballot Arguments for Interchange Advisory Measure
This matter was continued from the July 6, 1988, meeting. It was
moved by Vice Mayor Clevenger, seconded by Councilman Stutzman and
passed 3-0 to designate the mentbers of the City Council to write the
ballot argument opposing the ballot measure. All three members of
the City Council present indicated their willingness to sign the
argument in opposition.
It was moved by Vice Mayor Clevenger, seconded by Councilman
Stutzman, and passed 3-0 that the Council not appoint any members of
the City Council to write the ballot argument favoring the ballot
measure.
Discussion ensued concerning the procedure under the Elections Code
for choosing the ballot argument favoring the advisory measure. The
City Clerk reviewed his memorandum on the subject presented to the
City Council on July 6, 1988, and indicated he had prepared a reply
to the letter from FACS received this date inquiring into how
arguments are selected. The City Clerk noted that the deadline for '
filing arguments will be August 12, 1988, at 5:00 p.m. The deadline
for filing rebuttal arguments will be August 22, 1988, at 5:00 p.m.
Village Design Manual Task Force
Council directed staff to select interested individuals as set forth
in the enabling resolution adopted on July 6, 1988, for appointment
by the Council on August 3, 1988. The City Manager requested the
Page - 2
Council to give him any names Councilmembers might have in mind by
July 18, 1988.
Resolution 250~ ~ Appointing Council Representatives to various
committees and Agencies
It was moved by Mayo~ Anderson, seconded by Vice Mayor Clevenger to
adopt Resolution-250t. Motion passed 3-0.
Nelson Property Task Force
The council appointed the following persons to the Nelson Property
Task Force: Anne Kolb, Donald Macrae, Sally McElravey, James
Compton, Catherine Gaskell, Gary Nemetz, Carolyn Alexander, Ann
Waltonsmith, and Louise Gager. Also appointed are Susan Guch
representing the Planning Commission, Rich Vallone representing the
Parks and Recreation Commission, a representative from the Nelson
Foundation and a representative from Ainsley Development. The Mayor
is to act as chair and an ex-officio non-voting member of the Task
Force.
Meetings are to be held on the second and fourth Thursdays of the
month. The first meeting is to be scheduled for July 28, 1988.
It will be the charter of the Task Force to:.
1. Examine realistic alternatives to residential development.
2. Examine realistic development options.
3. Examine alternatives for public use of the property.
The Task Force is to complete its work in time for consideration by
the City Council at its continued public hearing on the general plan
amendment proposed for the Nelson Property set for December 21, 1988.
It was moved by Councilman Stutzman, seconded by Vice Mayor Clevenger
and passed 3-0 to appoint the members as indicated and to adopt the
charter for the Task Force as set forth. Each member of the Task
Force with the exception of the Mayor shall be voting members.
The City Manager reported that:
1. The Chamber of Commerce has requested a joint meeting between its
Board and the City Council. It was agreed to plan to meet on the
evening of August 9, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. Staff to notify the Chamber
of Commerce President, Mr. Stanga. Possible.topics of discussion to
include how to handle zoning for outdoor dining and sign regulations.
2. At its meeting of July 11, 1988, the Parks and Recreation Com-
mission had discussed the need to renovate Brookglen Park and has
asked staff to work with the neighborhood to present a proposal to
the commission in the next couple of months. The condition of the
play structure was also discussed and if found to be a safety problem
by the City Manager he will have the structure removed and report
such action to the City Council.
In the boundary area between Saratoga and Monte Sereno there appears
to be an area which was never included in either city's sphere of
influence by the Local Agency Formation Commission. This matter will
be checked out by the Planning staff with LAFCO and the County
Engineer mapping division, and if verified he will meet with the
Monte Sereno City Manager to discuss a joint aplication to LAFCO to
correct this oversight.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:50 p.m.
Pect.~-~u.~c~ted'
~~rk
Page 3