Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-19-1992 City Council Minutes MINUTES SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL TIME: Wednesday, February 19, 1992 - 7:30 p.m. PLACE: Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Ave. TYPE: Regular Meeting 1. ROLL CALL Councilmembers Present: Clevenger, Monia, Stutzman, Anderson, Mayor Kohler. Staff Present: City Manager Peacock, City Attorney Riback, City Engineer Perlin, Interim Planning Director Eisner. 2. CEREMONIAL ITEMS - None. 3. ROUTINE MATTERS A. Approval of Minutes - 2/5; 2/11' Councilmember Clevenger amended the minutes of 2/5 as follows: Page 6, Mrs. King's comments regarding an "accessible item" should be clarified; Page 9, 4th Paragraph, "make a statement" should be changed to "balance nearby projects". Councilmember Anderson amended the minutes of 2/5 as follows: Page 7, 6th Paragraph should read "...proceeding more slowly toward .implementation of ADA requirements, because of lack of funding from the County". ANDERSON/MONIA MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF 2/5, AS AMENDED. PASSED S-0. Mayor Kohler noted he would like his opinion noted in the minutes of 2/11 regarding the Duties of the Mayor, that there is no policy concerning endorsements. MONIA/STUTZMAN MOVED TO APPROVED THE MINUTES OF 2/11, AS AMENDED. PASSED 5-0. B. Approval of Warrant List CLEVENGER/MONIA MOVED APPROVAL OF THE WARRANT LIST. PASSED 5-0. C. Report of City Clerk on Posting of Agenda City Manager Peacock stated pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on February 14. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Planning Commission Actions, 2/12 - Note and file. B. Public Safety Commission Minutes - 2/10 - Note and file. C. Ordinance 71.102 amending Section 4-50.020 of the Municipal Code relating to peddlers and solicitors reguirmment for a business license (second reading and adoption) D. Ordinance 71.103 designating City Engineer as City Traffic Engineer (second reading and adoption) E. Resolution 92-006 granting Marchetti Appeal heard 2/5 F. Resolutlon 92-007 granting Ruehle Appeal heard 2/5 G. Rakone Foundation Fund Raising - 1/3/92 through City Council Minutes 2 Februar~ 19# 1992 2/5/92 H. City Financial Reports for January: 1) Treasuretee Report 2) Investment Report 3) Financial Report I. Ratification of extension of City Attorney Contract dated Janual7 2, 1991, through December 31, 1992, with the same terms and conditions as discussed with the City Attorney in closed session on Februaz7 1992 Final Hap Approval for 2 lots at 19171 Oahu Lane (SD89-01S)(Developer, Sarayco) Councilmember Anderson noted she would like to remove item 4a from the Consent Calendar. CLEVENGER/MONIA MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR WITH THE EXCEPTION OF 4a. PASSED 5-0. Councilmember Anderson questioned State Law regarding the merging of lots when a parcel is less than 5,000 s.f. City Attorney Riback stated they have to be owned by the same owner. .Interim Planning Director Eisner noted this question was brought up at the Planning Commission, but this parcel is individually owned and there is no interest in either property owner buying it. ANDERSON/MONIA MOVED TO APPROVE ITEM 4a. PASSED 5-0. CONSENT CALENDAR II - Claims Against the City A. Claim of Ford/Farmer,s Ins. co. in connection with tree in Landscaping and Lighting District which fell on property CLEVENGER/MONIA MOvzD TO REFER THIS TO THE CITY MANAGER FOR SETTLEMENT. PARSED 5-0. 5. COMMUNICATIONS FROM COMMI88IONS AND THE PUBLIC A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Kohler informed the public of the process of Oral Communications. Councilmember Anderson noted that issues relating to City Business only should be addressed. She noted citizens have a chance to speak about other issues on the TV channel under 5 minute Free Speech Message. Ms. Jill Hunter, President, Saratoga Union School District, noted the last two Council meeting were very upsetting as the School District has been accused of falsehood. She thanked the Councilmembers who spoke on behalf of the District. She noted if future Council meetings are to be formed of criticism, the District would like to be informed so as to respond. She stated the schools represent the heart of the Community and the children are the future. Ms. Alexander noted she would like to address the Council regarding a project approved last year on Hidden Hill. She noted the Council gave certain mandated requirements regarding grading, contouring City Council Minutes 3 Februaz7 19w 1992 the land, benching, etc., which have not been followed. She stated the drainage is coming down off the property Onto her property, and noted other problems. She asked the City to enforce the mandated requirements so that every citizen is assured equals rights of the City. Ms. Alexander presented copies of the property owners conditions to the Council. She noted these problems were brought to staff's attention, but got no response and feels it is the City's responsibility to rectify the problems. Councilmember Anderson stated staff should look into this. Councilmember Clevenger questioned if this is in an area the Flood Control would be interested in and the City should contact them to look into this matter. Mr. Jeff Schwartz, San Marcos Rd., expressed concern regarding the grants awarded at the last meeting. He noted, although he supports the Senior Coordinating Council, they should not be awarded money to put in the bank when other agencies need the money to survive. Councilmember Clevenger suggested that Mr. Schwartz concerns be directed to Mrs. King or the Senior Coordinating Council for answers. Councilmember Monia noted it would be helpful, in the response letter, to have statement of the Senior Coordinating Council's bank account and how much money they will have one year from now. Mr. Heber Teerlink noted a cross-complaint in the Cocciardi case was being served to several Councilmembers and the City Manager. He addressed the issues of the complaint. He noted~ the Council should prepare themselves for additional issues. Mr. Teerlink addressed Tract 7770. Councilmember Anderson noted she discussed with a member of the TV Board the possibility of using the TV Cable channel to help the unemployment within the City. She stated if people are interested they should contact the City. Ms. Laurie Fell addressed the work Cal-Trans are doing on Rodeo Creek. She noted as a community, they are looking towards the Council for direction and protecting the citizens best interest. She explained the damage to trees done by Cal-Trans, noting several homeowners have lost their trees. She stated that Cal-Trans said they would install guy wires around the trees and this has not been done. Ms. Fell also addressed the light at the intersection of Plumas and Prospect, noting the timing is off. She also requested that Cal-Trans repave the road between the corridor and Rodeo Creek when improvements are finished. Councilmember Anderson noted she had the same problem with Cal- Trans regarding a tree on her property, she requested that staff look into this. Mayor Kohler moved to item 2B at this time. B. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 2) Joanne Cornblest, 12105 Saraglen Dr., objecting to destruction of foliage adjacent to Rodeo Creek. City Manager Peacock noted he talked to Mr. Kempton of the Traffic Authority and they will look into this issue. He noted the Traffic Authority are supposed to be overlooking this project and will discuss this with Cal-Trans. Staff will help move the process along. Councilmember Anderson expressed concern about the lack of guy wires noting these should go up as soon as possible. ,City Council Xinutes 4 February 19, 1992 Ms Laurie Fell noted her appreciation for the concern of the Council. She noted she is very disappointed in the appearance of the Creek, she noted it should have a natural look. Ms. Joanne Cornbleet, 12105 Saraglen Dr., noted trees have been lost as a result of the work by Cal-Trans and noted a landscaping plan and money should come forward to improve the creek, but so far cannot get any response. She noted her appreciation for continuing support of the Council. Mr. Jerry Kocir, 12855 Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd., expressed concern regarding other portions of Rodeo Creek and noted he has appeared before the City Council several times regarding the upkeep of the creek. He noted the Santa Clara Valley Water District should be responsible for keeping the Creek clean and hopes the City can get a response from them. 1) Peter Thompson, 20720 4th St. .~14, requesting reconsideration of grant application. Councilmember Monia noted he will abstain from this item as he has done so in the past. City Manager Peacock reiterated comments from the Memo from Mrs. King, Assistant to the City Manager. He noted Mr. Thompson has submitted a request for reconsideration. Mr. Peacock noted this is a matter of adjusting the budget to fund Thompson Trio. Mayor Kohler noted he would be in favor of reconsidering the application from Thompson Trio if all the information was not presented at the first hearing. Councilmember Anderson stated she is not in favor of adjusting the budget at this time and felt it would be appropriate for Mr. Thompson to reapply next year. Councilmember Stutzman noted the City has been generous in allocating funds and should not go beyond the amount allocated in the budget. He urged Mr. Thompson to reapply next year and the Council will consider it then. He is not in favor of altering the budget. Councilmember Clevenger stated she is not in favor of altering the budget at this time. She noted at the time this was considered she did speak in favor. of allocating funds, but didn't get the support. Mayor Kohler noted at the time the Council considered this it was an incomplete application and wants to reconsider it at this time. ANDERSON/STUTZMAN MOVED TO LEAVE THE ALLOCATION FUNDS A8 18 AND DISCUS8 D~RING POLICY STAGE. PASSED 3-1-1 (Kohler No, Monia abstain) Mr. Peter Thompson, Thompson Trio, stated he appreciates the Mayor's comments. He noted his letter which he presented two weeks ago was not answered. Mr. Thompson stated it is not required in the guidelines to appear at the Council meeting when considering the application. He noted he would like the public record clarified that he has provided services to the City. Councilmember Anderson informed Mr. Thompson that, although it is not a necessary requirement to attend the Council meeting when considering the grant, it is in his favor to do so. councilmember Clevenger suggested that the City send Mr. Thompson a letter indicating the results of the vote and there be a statement indicating that all documentation was received from Mr. Thompson. City Council Minutes 5 February 19, 1992 There was a consensus to send the letter as suggested by Councilmember Clevenger. 3) Cindy Kline, 1933 Colusa Way, San Jose 95130, with petition regarding trail standards, trail priorities and trail policies in Saratoga. City Manager Peacock noted it would be appropriate to refer this to the Parks and Recreation Commission for discussion at their March 2 meeting and notify Ms. Kline. There was a consensus to refer this matter to the Parks and Recreation Commission as recommended by Mr. Peacock. 6. OLD BUSINESS A. Advisory Ballot Measure to Limit Terms of City councilmembers City Manager Peacock stated this matter was scheduled for a public hearing on February 5, 1992, but was not heard and is therefore on this agenda under old business. He suggested that the City Council allow public testimony at this hearing. He noted the resolution before the Council, if adopted, will call for a special election and this is the last meeting for the Council to take action before the ballot measure deadline. Mr. Jerry Kocir, 12855 Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd., spoke in favor of a two term limit, noting that incumbents have the force behind them to be reelected. Councilmember Anderson noted her disappointment to the lack of response from the public. She feels this will be a waste of time as there are discussions regarding changing the State Law next year. She feels this is not a pertinent issue for the City at this time and at this level the issue of incumbency is not as compelling. Councilmember Monia does not feel that this is a waste of time as there are a number of people who choose not to run if they are running against an incumbent. He feels the City should participate in the State Debate, this is a way for the City to be involved. He feels if the City supports term limits at State level then this is one way to join in the State Debate. He spoke in favor of the term limits throughout the State. He requested that the term for being ineligible for election should be three years as opposed to two. Councilmember Clevenger noted she will vote against this because she feels Saratoga residents should have the right to elect whoever they want and have the opportunity to reelect if they wish. She noted if incumbents are being elected, then the residents want them in office. She feels it is not good for Saratoga to have term Councilmember Stutzman stated he is in favor of this going to the ballot as the people in Saratoga are entitled to express their opinion. He noted it will let the legislature know that cities like Saratoga are concerned about this issue and would like it on the ballot, if it passes. He feels term limits are needed and needed at every level. Mayor Kohler feels it is much better to let the residents vote for this. MONIA/STUTZMANMOVED TO i~I~END THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION FROM 2 TO 3 YEARS. PASSED 3-2 (Clevenger, Anderson No). MONIA/STUTZMANMOVED TO APPROVE THERESOLUTIONASAMENDED. PASSED 3-2 (Clevenger, Anderson No). City Courtoil Ninutes 6 Pebruary 19, 1992 .Councilmember Clevenger questioned the ballot arguments. 'City Manager Peacock noted the time frame for the ballot arguments, .noting this should be discussed at the next study session. Mayor Kohler proceeded to the public hearings at this time. 8. PUBLIC BEARINGS - 8:30 p.m. A. Resolution amending General Plan designation boundaries from Very Low Density Residential (RVLD) to Hillside conservation single-Family (RHC) 7 ordinance rezoning portions of parcels from R-1- 40,000 to NHR in connection with a lot line adjustment at 14684 Pike Road and 20700 Saratoga Bills Road, with the associated environmental Negative Declaration (Applioant, Head/Allison) (APN 503-30-047, 503-29-012) (GPA91-0027 AZO91-004) Planning Interim Eisner noted in August 1991, the Planning Commission approved a lot line adjustment which did not modify the map, so staff has initiated the General Plan Map amendment and the Zoning Map amendment to bring the lines into conformity with one another. He noted this is a technical amendment. Mayor Kohler opened the public hearing at 8:50 p.m. Mayor Kohler closed the public hearing at 8:51 p.m. MONIA/STUTZMAN MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 92-010 AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 8UBJECT TO THE STAFF REPORT. PASSED 4- 1-0 (anderson temporarily absent) MONIA/STUTZMAN MOVED TO APPROVE THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION. PASSED 4-1-0 (Anderson temporarily absent). MONIA/aTUTZMAN MOVED TO INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN TERRITORY WITHIN THE CITY IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR~S PARCEL NUMBER 503-30-047 AND THAT PORTION OF 503-29-012 BY TITLE ONLY, WAIVING FURTHER READING. PASSED 5-0. B. Ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance to limit the location and height of satellite dish antennae, with the associated environmental Negative Declaration (first reading and introduction) City Manager Peacock reiterated comments from the staff report dated February 19, 1992. Planning Interim Eisner noted this is brought before the City Council to bring into conformance the City Zoning Ordinance with the Federal Law dealing with satellite dish antennae. He noted there are inconsistencies in the City Ordinance with regards to such structures. He noted to modify the ordinance they are using language which is already part of the zoning code relating to other accessory structures. He recommended that the definition of satellite dish antennae be added to the definition section of the ordinance. Mr. Eisner outlined the technical changes as outlined in the staff report. In response to Councilmember Stutzman~s guestion, Mr. Eisner noted the Planning Commission appeared to take exception to being dictated by the Federal Government. They were not happy with the proposal and did not have an alternative. Councilmember Monia noted he has talked to the Chairperson of the Planning Commission, it is his understanding that this came about because the Planning Commission felt that the City need to review the Ordinance regarding this issue. He noted the City needs to understand what the legal limitations of the Federal Law are. City Council Minutes 7 Febrdal-7 19, 1992 Mr. Eisner stated the Federal Government have control of the reception over the public airways, he explained the Federal Law noting it is a 1st Amendment issue. Councilmember Monia noted the City should have some discretion as to where the location should be. City Attorney Riback noted the Planning Commission did raise the issue in 1991 asking for guidance regarding this issue. He noted during the time the City was looking into this, the Community Services Department was approached by a satellite dish installer who reviews Ordinances. He noted the City Attorney's office was requested to review the Ordinance and they came back with modifications to ordinance which are very minimal and still in compliance with Federal Law. He noted the City has not lost its discretion with respect to location, screening, height and size of such antennae. He noted the two primary distinctions are that satellite dishes will be treated no different from other accessory structures; the second major change is that rather than absolutely disallowing roof mounted satellite dishes the recommendation is that the City allow some consideration of that type of installation if there is no other reasonable location on the property for adequate reception. Me noted the changes are in compliance with FCC. Councilmember Stutzman noted he discussed this issue with an Electronic Engineer and with technological advance over the years, the large satellite dishes will not be needed to receive adequate reception. He feels this issue is becoming a non-issue and feels that adopting the ordinance will not infringe on people's rights. Interim Planning Director Eisner noted that the location of such dishes are subject to design and landscape considerations and approval. Mayor Kohler opened the public hearing at 9:12 p.m. Mayor Kohler closed the public hearing at 9:13 p.m. Councilmember Monia feels there is not a complete work product in front of them and feels it should be sent back to the Planning Commission. He feels it should not be treated as other accessory structures as it could possibly infringe on the reception. He noted if technoloq~y becomes available, as noted by Councilmember Stutzman, then this should be considered to be written into the Ordinances. City Attorney Riback noted the Ordinance before the City Council allows the Councilmembers to make the decisions about size, height etc. Councilmember Anderson noted she would like to see the minutes from the Planning Commission regarding this issue. She noted she received a phone call from a resident in the village area who expressed opposition to the dishes being placed on roof tops. City Manager Peacock noted this should be referred to the Planning Commission to look into the comments. made from Councilmember Stutzman and other issues relating to this topic. MONIA/ANDERSON MOVED TO SEND THIS ISSUE BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. PASSED 5-0. 7. NEW BUSINESS A. Agency Agreement Policy for AUXiliary Staffing - TV operations - Hakone Foundation Operations City Manager Peacock reiterated comments from his memo dated February 19, 1992. He explained how the services would work as .City Council Ninutes 8 February 19, 1992 outlined in the staff report. He noted if Council have no objection to the general policy, he would recommend that the City Council authorize the policy and for staff to report back to the 'Council with specific agreements. He noted the President of Hakone Foundation Eoard, and the Chair of the TV0peration did review the memo and support it. In response to Councilmember Stutzman~s question, Mr. Peacock stated the City will enter into the agreements with the understanding that this is full cost recovery item for the City. He noted the main advantage to both organizations, is that it allows them to have paid staffing without having to set up the extensive administrative apparatus which is required. He noted it is a cost saver for both parties. Councilmember Monia noted the City may recover some staff costs. In response to Mayor Kohler's question, Mr. Peacock noted both organizations will report to the city periodically to report the number of people hired. MONIA/STUTZMAN MOVED TO APPROVE POLICY OF DEVELOPING AGENCY AGREEMXNTS ON A COST RECOVERY BASIS WITH EACH SPECIFIC AGREEMENT TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. PASSED 5-0. B. ~-nual Review of Investment Policy City Manager Peacock stated State Law requires the City to review their Investment Policy of the City Treasurer on an annual basis. He noted the Finance Advisory Committee did review the policy and recommend changes as outlined in the staff report. Mr. Peacock explained the different rate of return from the different agencies. ANDEPaON/MONIA MOVED TO ACCEPT THE REVISED I~STMENT POLICY'AS SUBMITTED BY THE FINANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE. PASSED 5-0. C. Ratification of Appointment of Planning Directer and Moving Allowance as negotiated by the City Manager City Manager Peacock noted if is staff~s recommendation that the City Council ratify the appointment of Paul Curtis as Planning Director and payment of a moving and relocation allowance of $5,000 as approved by the City Council in closed session on January 21, 1992. ANDERBON/CLEVENGER MOVED TO ACCEPT STAFFeSRECOMMENDATION. PASSED D. Offer to Sell or Lease Surplus Land - State of California -Locationz 13685 Quito Road City Manger Peacock noted the City had received notice from the State of California of surplus property they want to sell at the above address. He stated if an organization, such as Project Match are interested in this property, the City could purchase it and in return sell it to Project Match. If theCity Council is interested in pursuing this, staff will look into the possibility of Project Match purchasing the property. He noted the price from the State is not known at this time, but if they cannot sell it to the City it may become negotiable, and he will look into this. CL~v~NGER/ANDERSON MOVED THAT STAFF RESEARCH POSSIBLE ACQUISITION OF THE PROPERTY FOR ACQUISITION FOR SHARED SENIOR HOUSING WITH THE PROJECT MATCH ORGANIZATION. City Manger Peacock explained how the State acquired this property. Councilmember Moniaquestioned if the Traffic Authority will inform City Council Minutes 9 February 19, 1992 the appraiser that a freeway will go in close to the property. The above motion was carried 5-0. E. Memo Authorizing Publicity for Upcoming Bearings - McCormick Appeal~ Zoning and Building Ordinance~ Trip Reduction Ordinance CLEVENGER/MONIA MOVED TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. PASSED 5- F. Resolution appointing members of the Appeals Board in accordance with the Uniform Code for Abatement of Dangerous Buildings and appointing the public member of the appeals Board in accordance with the Administrative code of the State of california city Manager Peacock explained the reasons for forming such a Board in the City of Saratoga. He stated this was perpetrated by the City~s order to continue demolition of the Paul Masson property. Under the Uniform Code they received a order to commence work within 60 days and this was issued December 2, 1991. He noted under the Uniform code the property owner has the right to appeal this order and this has been done. The appeal must then be heard by an Appeals Board, which Saratoga are now requesting to appoint members to serve on such a Board. Also, another appeal was pointed out relating to methods of construction and materials. He noted the member of the public appointed must be technically qualified and staff recommend the Council adopt the resolution making the appointment. CLEVENGER/ANDERSON MOVED TOAD OpT RESOLUTION 92-009. Mayor Kohler stated this Board is a good idea. The above motion was carried 5-0. 9. CITY COUNCIL ITEMS A. Agenda items for joint meeting with high school district City Manager Peacock noted he had a phone conversation with people in the Community asking if the City would entertain discussion with the High School District for the possibility of the City being able to use the premises of Saratoga High School for a Halloween Party. He suggested as this is a recreation activity it should be sponsored by the Youth Commission and approach the School Board with the idea that the City would like to consider this if the facilities can be made available. Councilmember Monia stated this is a good idea. He feels there was a break down in Communication, which caused the trouble last year. If the City get behind this it will be controlled. Mayor Kohler stated this is a good idea, but a big responsibility for the Youth Commission. Councilmember Anderson expressed concern'about the conflict between Junior and High School seniors coming together. She stated the Youth Commission will have to be creative. She noted she would also like to discuss the Recreation Department at the meeting. B. Appointment of Public Safety Commissioner City Manager Peacock suggested the Council appoint either Gaskell, Mitchell or Johnson to replace Commissioner Rose whose term has expired. Councilmember Clevenger stated that Colleen Connelly showed 'City Council Minutes 10 February 19, 1992 .interest in this Commission and asked the Council to consider her. City' Manager Peacock stated there has been discussion on Mr. · Smith~s availability to work on the Finance Committee as his work .'calls him out of town. He noted he has been unable to get in touch with Mr. Smith. If Mr. Smith cannot serve on the Committee there may be another position open. Councilmember Clevenger noted she was impressed when interviewing Ms. Connelly. Councilmember Anderson stated Ms. Connelly did prefer the Finance Committee. She feels the three people selected are all qualified and the Council should choose from one of them. Mayor Kohler concurred with Councilmember Anderson as did Councilmember Monia. MONIA/CLEVENQER MOVED TO APPOINTMR. JOHNSON TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION. Councilmember Anderson noted she favored Cathy Gaskell as she has background in public safety and feels she would be an asset to the Commission. The above motion was carried 5-0. C. Proposed letter to Senator Morgan from the Santa- Clara county Cities Association regarding provisions of SB 797 (Regional Government) Mayor Kohler stated that he 'and Councilmember Clevenger artended the meeting and there was a lot of confusion. He noted there were several amendments made to the letter, which is enclosed in the Councilmembers packets, of which none passed. Me asked if the Council is behind this letter. Councilmember Clevenger did not feel that the letter will make much difference and it won't hurt the City to support it. Councilmember Anderson stated if the City support the letter they are buying into this. She noted she would prefer to attend the ABAG meeting before supporting any letter. Councilmember Clevenger stated Senator Morgan proposes one third of the people be appointed, but the cities want all elected officials. The other main issue is to have a sub-regional organization. Councilmember Anderson stated the letter should reflect the concerns of the City and what they would like to see. Councilmember Monia stated that Senator Morgan's bills are not written out of concern for Saratoga citizens and other cities. ANDERSON/MONIA MOVED TO STATE THAT IT IS PREMATURE TO SUPPORT THE LETTER. PASSED 4-1 (Clevenger No) D. Reports from Individual Councilmembers Councilmember Clevenger discussed the Hakone Foundation Parking Fee Proposal. She noted Hakone want to implement this and suggest that the City Council indicate their approval or disapproval. Councilmember Anderson suggested it be called an entrance fee as opposed to parking fee, as a parking fee will give people the incentive to park elsewhere. Mayor Kohler stated this must be placed on the agenda in order to vote on it. City Council Minutes 11 Feb:uazy 19, X992 CLEVENGER/ANDERSON MOVED TO PLACE THIS ITEM ON THE AGENDA. PASSED Councilmember Monia stated there was an agreement with Hakone that there would be a two tier parking, a season pass and a daily parking fee. He noted this was discussed and the City encouraged Hakone Foundation to use this approach. He suggested that this be reemphasized to the Foundation. CL~v~N~ER/ANDERBON MOVED TO ALLOW THE HAKONE FOUNDATION TO IMPLEMENT PARKINGPOLICY AT THEHAKONE GARDENS ANDHEQUEET THEMTO CONSIDER A SEASON PASS FOR SARATOGA RESIDENTS. In response to. Councilmember Stutzman's question, Councilmember Clevenger stated people will not have to pay for parking when attending a function. City Manager Peacock stated his concern relates to the traffic impact, but if it becomes a problem, hopefully Hakone Foundation will look at this. He stated the Foundation should consider the time frame the City needs to review their requests. Councilmember Monia requested that the motion be modified so that Hakone FOundation must report back in four Months. The above motion with the amendment was carried 5-0. Councilmember Clevenger suggested sending Hakone Foundation a letter informing them that they need more time to review their requests. The Mayor agreed to do so. Mayor Kohler reported on the Mayors Meeting. He noted the Vasona project was discussed and there will be a hearing on 24th March to discuss this issue. Councilmember Anderson noted that Vasona was one of the last choices for light rail at the. TS010 meeting. She stated this does not go by the main places that draw commuters. The was a consensus that the City support the Vasona Corridor as requested by other cities in the West Valley. Councilmember Stutzman stated he discussed with Montalvo the possibility of having a representative from the City Council attend the meetings and requested that he be allowed to attend in place of the mayor. Mayor Kohler agreed. 10. /M~TOUI~MENT The meeting was adjourned at 10:35 to 9:00 a.m. on February 22 for field trip starting from the City Hall, then to 7:00 p.m. on February 25 in the Senior Day Care Center, 19655 Allendale Avenue. 11. CLOSED BESSION on pending litigation on illegal grading, clearing and tree removal on Cocciardi/Chadwick development, Tr. 7770. Respectfully submitted, Minutes Clerk