Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-18-1992 City Council Minutes MINUTES SARATOGA CITY CODNCIL TIME: Wednesday, March 18, 1992 - 7:30 p.m. PLACE: Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Ave. TYPE: Regular Meeting 1. ROLL CALL Councilmembers Present: Anderson, Monia, Stutzman, Mayor Kohler Clevenger (arrived 7:40 p.m.) Staff Present: City Manager Peacock, City Attorney Riback, Associate Planner Adar. 2. CEREMONIAL ITEMS A. Resolution commending Roseann Rose for service on Public Safety Commission MONIA/ANDERSON MOVED TO ADOPTRESOLUTION 92-015COMMENDING ROSEANNROSE FOR SERVICE ON THE PUBLIC SAFETY COIOilSSION. PASSED S-0. 3. ROUTINE MATTERS A. Approval Of Minutes - 3/4; 3/10 STUTZMAN/MONIA MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTE8 OF 3/4, AS PRESENTED. PASSED 5-0. MONIA/BTUTZMAN MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTE8 OF 3/10, AS PRESENTED. PASSED 5-0. B. Approval of Warrant List MONIA/ANDERSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE WARRANT LIST. PASSED 5-0. C. Report of City Clerk on Posting of Agenda City Manager Peacock stated pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on March 13. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Planning Commission Actions, 3/11 - Note and file. B. Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes, 2/3 - Note and file. C, Heritage Preservation Commission Minutes, 10/237 11/27; 1/8 - Note and file. D. Youth commission Minutes, 11/18~ 12/14; 1/13; 2/10 - Note and file. E. Public Safety Commission Minutes, 3/9 -- Note and file. F. Approval of Format of' Agreement for Auxiliary Staffing Services to be used by City Foundations G. City-Owned Property at QUito/Pollard Roads - Report from Parks and Recreation Commission on Use as a Park - Receive and file. H. Resolution 92-016 commending Adrienne Reiko Iwanaga as 1991 saratoga Citizen of the Year I. Final Acceptance of Improvements and Release of security, SD89-003, 20904 Prospect Road (J. McDonald, developer) J. Ordinance 71-104 amending Article 4-30 of City Code relatlng to Sale of Firearms (second reading and adoption) K. Hakone Foundation FUnd Raising - 2/5/92 - 3/9/92 c~ty Council Minutes 2 March 18, 1992 L. City Financial Reperts for Februax7; 1) Treasurer,s Report 2) Investment Report 3) Financial Report M. Results of the Waste Generation Study for the City of Saratoga A member of the public requested that item G of the Consent Calendar be removed. MONIA/ANDERSON MOVED APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ITEM G. PASSED S-0. City Manager suggested that item G be discussed under item 5B1. 5. COMMUNICATIONS FROM COMMISSION8 AND THE PUBLIC A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Lou Thorpe, 19550 Farwell Ave., stated the Council voted against taking a position on the Parcel tax and requested the Council give an explanation as to why .the Parcel Tax is on the Measure C campaign literature. Councilmember Anderson stated the Council decided not to discuss issues which are not under their jurisdiction. Mayor Kohler informed Mr. Thorpe that he should bring his request to the School Board. Mr. Ken Schoniger, 13493 Pierce Rd., expressed concern regarding the retaining wall being constructed on Pierce Rd., which is in direct opposition of the citizens. He stated the wall is in violation of the City's code and there is a safety hazard to the residents of Saratoga. He noted there was a vote of the neighbors to remove the retaining wall and stop any construction. He requested that the wall be removed and · the property be returned to its original position and feels the City has the responsibility to do this. Mayor Kohler asked Mr. Schoniger to send documents from the engineers to the City regarding this construction. Mr. Schoniger stated he did not want these documents to become part of the public record, but would provide these to the Mayor and Council only. Councilmember Monia stated documents sent to the City Hall do become part of the public record. Mr. Schoniger stated he will send the details of the construction damage without revealing any names. B. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1) Petition presented by four residents of Landscaping and Lighting District LLA-1 Nith signatures of S3 registered voters requesting dissolution of the district and sale of a park site. City Manager Peacock stated the request of the petition is to: 1) Dissolve the Landscape and Lighting District~ 2) Sell one of the two possible park sites or use other appropriate City funds to reimburse LLA-1 district members for any taxes paid to date or future taxes they might have to pay as part of LLA-1 assessments. Mr. Peacock stated a Resolution is required to dissolve the district. He also noted it is the Parks & Recreation Commission's recommendation City Council Minutes 3 March 18', 1992 that the City-owned parcel at the NE corner of Quito/Pollard Roads continue to be utilized for its view shed and open space features. In response to CouncilmemberAnderson's question, City Attorney Riback explained the deannexation process. CLEVENGER/ANDERBON MOVED TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE A RESOLUTION TO SET A PUBLIC HEARING FOR DEANNEXATION. Mr. Charles Shaw, 13920 Ravenwood Dr., stated last June 54% of LLA-1 residents voted against becoming a member of this district. Me noted in 1991 the residents of Quito Oaks Way presented a petition to withdraw and they were rebuffed. He noted a petition has been circulated in the LLA-1 district to see the following: LLA-1 disbanded; the yearly tax removed; one of the park sites should be sold and use the other'site for a park. Councilmember Monia stated he received phones calls from several people regarding this issue with a different view from what Mr. Shaw is bringing forward. He feels the petition encourages finding another means to finance the park. Mr. Shaw stated the park should be on Ravenwood. Mr. Preston Burlingham, 14173 Squirrel Hollow Lane, urged the Council to dissolve the LLA-1 district. Ms. Jennifer Crotty, Parks & Recreation Commissioner, stated the Parks & Recreation Commission are in favor of keeping the Quito/Pollard site as open space because they feel it is in an unsafe area for a park. Mr. Ken Colson, 13851 Raven Ct., stated the Council made a commitment to build a park and feels the Council did not have adequate reason to override the majority in favor of the park. He stated the City has the opportunity to use the money, from a past land sale of City property, to build a park, noting this money was designated for public use. Councilmember Monia noted he has had discussions with Mr. Borello. Mr. Leonard Borello, 14004 Quito Rd., questioned the possibility of Mr. Santoro buying the Quito/Pollard site to combine with his property to develop four homes. The City would then use the money from this sale to finance a Park on the Ravenwood site. Councilmember Clevenger stated the appropriate thing to do at this time is to vote on the deannexation and then a sub-committee of staff or council should report back on Mr. Borello's suggestion. Mr..Shaw read a letter from Mr. Joel Sharon, Ravenwood Dr., dated March 18, 1992, a copy of which will be delivered to the City Council. Councilmember Clevenger noted staff should work with the Parks & Recreation Commission to resolve this issue. She noted a park at Quito/Pollard is not appropriate. Councilmember Anderson explained the reasons why the Council originally overrode the petition. She stated Quito/Pollard is not appropriate for a Park. She recommended setting aside six months to work with a developer to see what can be done with this site. She stated that the residents of Ravenwood should give serious.thought to having a park in the neighborhood as young families will eventually move in. Councilmember Monia stated when the Council made their decision last July they were not aware of the site on Quito/Pollard. He asked the City Attorney about Notices of Protest. City Attorney stated if the issue of assessment comes before the City Council, this is a separate issue from deannexation and this can come up anytime during the year. He stated there is no such thing as a majority protest at the annual assessment proceeding. The Council needs a simple majority. Mayor Kohler stated at the time of the vote they were not dealing with C~ty Courtoil Miautes · March 18# 1992 a~l the issues, He stated he will support the motion. C0uncilmember Monia asked Mr. Borello if Mr. Santore was going to propose anything to the City in writing. Mr. Borello stated he will suggest this to Mr. Santoro. Councilmember Monia requested that the City Manager contact Mr. Santoro and also present to the Council background information on the sale of public property. The above motion was carried. 5-0. 2) Letter from Senator Morgan on Bay Vision A~tion coalition draft of SB 797; Request for Gemmerits City Manager Peacock stated he recommends that the City Council authorize response regarding this version of SB 797 by the Mayor and City Manager after discussion by the City Council. Councilmember Anderson stated she will be attending the ABAG meeting and would like a consensus from the Council as to their position. She suggested supporting what Contra Costa County have proposed. Councilmember Monia suggested this be discussed under City Council Items. 3) Request for Partial Waiver of Fees for Use of Hakone Gardens - May 27, 1992 - Hospice of the Valley Staff recommend that the Council consider request of a partial waiver; current rental rate - $800. Request would result in a charge of about $40. CLEVENGER/ANDERSON MOVED TO WAIVE THE FEES. PASSED 5-0. The Councilmembers moved to the public hearings at this time. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 8:30 p.m. A. Appeal of variance denial. to construct a 6-ft. high fence within the front and exterior street side yard setbacks where a 3-ft. high fence is permitted at 14761 Bohlman Road. (Appellant/applicant, Persico)(Vgl-014) City Manager Peacock presented photos of the site. Associate Planner Adar presented the staff report dated March 18, 1992. She stated the variance application consists of two parts, which are: 1) construction of a 138 s.f. bedroom addition, which was approved by the Planning Commission; 2) proposal to erect a six foot high fence within required front and exterior side yard setbacks where three feet is permitted, this was denied by the Planning Commission. She noted staff has provided an alternative fence location which would not necessitate a variance. This is shown on Exhibit B in the staff report. She noted the applicant feels the lot is exposed to noise and has no privacy. City Manager Peacock asked the Council if they received the letter from Commissioner Bogosian in favor of this project. He also noted the location of the fence, proposed by the applicant, does not violate the site distance requirements under the municipal code. Mayor Kohler noted he did visit the site and has no concerns regarding the view obstruction for traffic. The public hearing was opened at 8:40 p.m. Mr. Ray Persico, 14761 Bohlman Rd., stated the proposal is to have the fence 15 ft. setback on 6th street and 5 ft setback on Bohlman. He stated the fence will be an improvement to the area. Mr. Persico reiterated comments from his letter addressed to the City Council dated March 18, 1992, which outlined his reasons for the variance request. City Council Ninutes 5 .. aarch 18, 1992 He stated the existing fence is 61/2 feet tall and 20 ft. from the property line. He stated if they could extend this fence it would not provide adequate screening. Councilmember Anderson stated the property does not have a back or side yard and feels this property is exceptional. The access from the property was discussed. Mr. Bill Brown stated he has no objection with the fence as proposed by the applicant. Ms. Diana Tully Brown stated she is in favor of the fence as proposed. Mayor Kohler closed the public hearing at 8:48 p.m. Councilmember Clevenger stated there is no objection to the proposal by the applicant and finds no reason to deny the fence. She noted Bohlman Road is noisy, and will support the request. Councilmember Anderson stated she -does not feel there is a safety issue, which are the concerns of the Planning Commission. She stated this is an old lot of record which does not provide for a backyard and could support findings that this is an unusual circumstance. Councilmember Monia stated as traffic continues to increase the higher fence will be more appropriate for sound abatement. He stated he would support the applicant's request. Councilmember Stutzman stated he has reservations about granting variances. He feels the property owners are aware of the problems before purchasing the property. He stated the Council is sending mixed messages to the Planning Commission regarding variances. Councilmember Anderson suggesting requiring landscaping in front of the fence. Councilmember Monia stated that residents on arterial streets are impacted by noise from traffic. He noted as more data comes in regarding sound buffing, trees are not adequate to buffer the noise. Councilmember Stutzman asked about the trucks parking on this street. Mayor Kohler stated he concurs with Councilmember Stutzman regarding granting variances, but feels this is a unique situation. He noted there are other fences in the area and this will be an improvement to the neighborhood. MONIA/ANDERSON MOVED TO OVERTURN THE PLANNING COMMISSION,8 DENIAL MEETING THE FINDINGS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN THE PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS. PASSED 5-0. Councilmember Clevenger stated she does not feel that they are relaxing the standards for the variances but considering on a case by case basis. City Manager Peacock stated he will refer the truck parking to the City Engineer. B. Appeal of denial of variance approval to allow a swimming pool and associated decking to extend into the required exterior side yard setback at 21110 Canyon View Dr. in the R- 1-40,000 zone district. (Appellant/applicant, Gardanier) (V92-001) Associate Planner Adar presented the staff report dated March 8, 1992. She noted this application is similar to the previous application. She stated the variance request consists of three parts and noted these, as outlined in the staff report. She noted staff recommend approval of the fence and pool. The Councilmembers questioned the fence around the swimming pool. City Council Ninutes 6 Narch 18, 1992 City Attorney Riback stated the fence is required under the Uniform Bdilding Code as well as the City code. C6uncilmember Monia noted he visited the site; he asked why the pool could not go more towards the back of the property. ASsociate Planner Adar stated the Planning Commission feel it can be pdshed towards the back, but the applicant does not feel this is a~propriate. Mayor Kohler opened the public hearing at 9:08 p.m. Mr. Glen Cahoon, Designer, stated the Planning Commission did not understand the significant location of the pool and deck. He noted the applicant agrees with the staff report regarding the deck. He stated the pool could be pushed back, but it would'be out of the sun and if pushed forward it wouldbe too close to the residence. Mr. Cahoon explained other options with regards to the location of the pool and deck, but because of configuration of the lot, he feels the proposed location is the best. Mr. Paul Gardanier, 21110 Canyon View Dr., presented photos of his property to the City Council and requested that the Council accept the recommendation of staff. He stated there are three issues that make this property unique, those being: 1) it is impractical to relocate the pool; 2) it is hillside property. He explained the position of the house regarding the visibility issue; 3) the 25 ft. setback required is excessive. In response to CouncilmemberAnderson'squestion, Mr. Cahoon stated 90% of the chain link fence is between the Cypress trees. Ms. Gardanier stated they would like to use the backyard for children and want some privacy. The Councilmembers discussed the zoning of the area and asked staff to look into this. Mayor Kohler closed the public hearing at 9:25 p.m. Councilmember Monia stated he has no objections to the pool, but is concerned about the fence. He noted alternatives to the fence should be discussed. Councilmember Anderson stated it is unfair to require the full front yard setback. She stated her concern would be with the possibility of future street widening, but does not anticipate this happening. Mr. Cahoon explained the reason for the location of the fence noting it would be contiguous with the existing fence. He explained the design of the fence. Mr. Cahoon outlined the existing and proposed fence on the site plan map. Ms. Gardanier outlined the location of the fence on the photos presented to the Council. Mayor Kohler closed the public hearing at 9:35 p.m. Councilmember Anderson stated she could make the finding for the pool, because of the configuration of the lot. She proposed that the fence be attached from the chain link to the far back of the house and the chain link should be black. Mr. Gardanier stated what Councilmember Anderson proposes would lose the privacy they want because of the different grade. MONIA/ANDERSON MOVED TO UPHOLD THE PLANNING COMMISSION,8 DECISION REGARDING THE DECK. City Manager Peacock explained that a deck structure would require a building permit. The above motion passed. 5-0. City Council Minutes 7 March XS, 1992 MONIA/CLEVENGER MOveD TO APPROVE THE POOL SITE AS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT, OVERTURNING THE PLANNING COMMIBBION,B DENIAL WITH THE FINDINGS: UNIQUE LOT DEBIGN~ HAS ROAD ON ALL THREE BIDES. PASSED 5-0. Councilmember Monia reiterated the options for the fence, those being: 1) approve as requested by the applicant~ 2) modify as proposed by Councilmember Anderson~ 3) have fence around the pool only. Councilmember Monia feels there are ways to construct a fence around the pool which does not require a variance and still allows the applicant use of the pool. He suggested the applicant come back with alternatives. Associate Planner Adar stated because of the location of the Pool, the fence will require a variance. Councilmember Anderson stated a good location for the fence is in among the cypress trees, there would be no impact on people driving by. Councilmember Monia noted he cannot make findings to grant a variance for the fence. CLEVENGER/ANDERSON MOVED TO ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL BY COUNCILMEMBER ANDERSON WITH THE CHAIN LINK TO BE BLACK. PASSED 3-1-1 (Monia No, Stutzman abstain). 6. OLD BUSINESS A. Report on Council,s Request to research Ombudsman Programs Staff recommend the City Council review staff report and provide further direction as necessary. City Manager Peacock reiterated comments from the staff report. He noted this is similar to the Complaint Manager Systems (CMS).. He noted after research, staff found out that San Jose discontinued their Ombudsman in 1980. Colonel E.T. Barco stated the Saratoga News presented a letter from him which was not printed correctly. He recommends that the City get a volunteer for the position of Ombudsman. He feels this position is important to the Citizens of the City who do not want to directly contact the City Council or do not know the procedures to follow. He noted he would be willing to brief any volunteers on this position which he has held for the last seven years. In response to Mayor Kohler's question, Colonel Barco stated that staff does not always know that there is a problem and therefore cannot give adequate help. He noted staff is loaded down with paper work. Councilmember Anderson stated that most residents use the City Councilmembers as ombudsman. She suggested a brochure for applicants which outlines the process to follow. Also the brochure should outline the departments within the City Hall and their functions. She noted she feels uncomfortable using a volunteer. Colonel Barco stated people are uncomfortable about speaking in front of the City Council at a public hearing. Mayor Kohler stated if residents have problems they should contact the Councilmembers and would encourage individuals to do so. Councilmember Clevenger concurred with Mayor Kohler noting that issues need to come before the Council and would also encourage people to do this. Councilmember Anderson suggested placing an article in the Saratoga News with names and phones numbers that people can contact when problems come up. Councilmember Monia stated that he concurs with Colonel Barco that some residents do not want to contact the Councilmembers and need a middle person to find'out who they should address their problems to. C~ty Council Ninutes 8 Narch 18, 1992 Ceuncilmember Anderson stated there is a person on staff to handle c~mplaints. Councilmember Monia stated he is not against an ombudsman, but does not f~el the City has a need for one. Mayor Kohler stated he would encourage people to keep writing and c~lling Councilmembers and staff. There was a consensus to put an article in the Saratoga News informing residents who they can contact and also Councilmembers' names and phone numbers. City Manager Peacock suggested using the same public approach as the City of Modesto use. B. Approval of Contract with Network Administration consultant and Appropriations Resolution Staff recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute contract; adopt resolution. CLEVENGER/ANDERSON MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH THE PC EDGE ANDTOADOPTHEBOLUTION 91-46.7. PASSED 5-0. City Manager Peacock noted the Councilmembers will receive a Users manual. C. Report from Maintenance Director on Trails in response to Petition from Cindy Kline Mr. Trinidad, Parks & Recreation Commission, stated it is the Commission's recommendation that improvements of the trails must be a condition required, prior to issuance of occupancy. He noted there are problems with improving the trails that were part of a subdivision several years ago, as outlined in the staff report. He explained the reasons why some different types of surface will be required on the trails in certain portions. He noted the Commission does support Mr. Brooks' suggestion and does support the equestrian/trail system. In response to Mayor Kohler's question regarding problems with past subdivisions, Mr. Trinidad stated the City has not, in the past, got these trails completed, but the City is now requiring the completion of the trails. Mr. Brooks spoke in support of the Parks & Recreation Commission's recommendation. He feels the bonds required are not strong enough. He feels the recommendation becomes self executed and makes the City's job easier. He encouraged the Council to follow the recommendation. Councilmember Clevenger stated that the bonds required are not working and the City needs to take other actions. City Manager Peacock stated it would be appropriate for the City to propose a condition that would be placed on any future land development for the Planning Commission to accept. He noted it is his experience that the pressure from the homeowners is on the City as opposed to the developer. He feels there is weakness in the condition proposed. Councilmember Monia stated the only way .to ensure the trails are completed is to require cash deposits from developers up front. He feels bonds are not the answer nor is certificates of occupancy. City Manager Peacock stated staff is working on changing the requirements for bonding and they will tie in the trails with this. Mayor Kohler stated a time schedule for constructing the trails is needed. He stated the trails should be constructed while the homes are being built. City Manager Peacock stated this is included in the conditions. Councilmember Clevenger requested that the City Manager report back to city Council Minutes 9 March 18, 1992 the Council on the above concerns. MONIA/CLEVENGER MOVED TO REQUEST THE CITY MANAGER RaPORT BACK TO THE COUNCIL ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAILS AND CONSIDER CASH BONDING. PASSED 5-0. D. Pierce Rd. Bridge at Sarahills Drive - CIP 953= Approval of Design Engineering Agreement ANDEHEON/CLEVENGER MOVED TO APPBOVE THE AGREEMENT ANDAUTHORIZE STAFF TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT. PASSED 5-0. In response to Councilmember Monia's question, Mr. Peacock stated the bridge would take approximately 9 to 12 months to complete. 7. NEW BUSINESS A. Report from Assistant to the City Manager on Offer from State to Sell or Lease Surplus Land - House at 13685 Quito Road CLEVENGER/ANDERSON MOVED TO ACCEPT THE STAFF REPORT. PASSED 5-0. B. Request from Public Safety commission to approve Funding of Additional crossing Guard Position and Appropriations Resolution to provide funds Staff recommend that the City Council authorize additional crossing guard and approve appropriation resolution in the amount of $2,000. ANDERSON/MONIA MOVED TO AUTHORISEADDITIONALCRO88ING GUARD ANDAPPBOVE APPROPRIATION RESOLUTION 91-46.8 IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,000. PASSED 5-0. Ms. Karen Dowdy, Public Safety Commission, encouraged the Council to go forward with the request. C. Recommendation for Public Safety Certificates of Recognition - to be Presented at April I council Meeting CLEVENGER/MONIA MOVED TO RECOGNIZETHE PUBLIC AGENCY SERVING SARATOGA. PASSED 5-0. D. Memo AuthorizingPublicity for Upcoming Hearings - williamson Appeal CLEVENGER/ANDEHEON MOVED TO ACCEPT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. PASSED 5-0. City Manager Peacock requested that the Council consider an item regarding Waste Management vs. Palm Springs Recycling. City Manager Peacock passed out a letter to the Councilmembers. CLEVENGER/ANDERSON MOVED TO PLACE THIS ITEM ON THE AGENDA AS AM EMERGENCY ITEM. PASSED 5-0. City Manager Peacock stated this is similar to a problem that could arise in Saratoga regarding commercial recyclers who are picking up trash. He stated it is important that the City have an opportunity to regulate Such activity. He noted if the City decide to file an amicus brief Saratoga will be added to a list of other cities with their concerns. Councilmember Clevenger stated this is a problem in Saratoga and the City should file an amicus brief. CLEVENGER/ANDERSON MOVED TO ADD THE CITY OF SARATOGA TO THE LIST. PASSED 5-0. 9. CITY COUNCIL ITEMS A. Agenda items for joint meeting with Heritage Preservation Commission on March 24 1) Heritage Preservation Commission Activity Report for City Council Xinutes 10 aarch 18, X992 1991-92 2)Review of Commission,s Work Program for 1992-93 3)Incentive/Education Program - positive approach 4)Short slide show - Lie Ansnes 5) Before meeting: Interviews with Library EXpansion Committee Applicants at 7:00 p.m. Councilmember Anderson suggested that the Heritage Preservation Commission revisit the issue of Saratoga Ave. as a Heritage lane. B. Reports from Individual Councilmembers Mayor Kohler reported on the Cities Association Meeting. He noted the letter from Senator Morgan was discussed and the two issues discussed were voted down. He noted there was a discussion on the Toll Road proposed from Livermore to Sacramento and there was opposition from Green Belt Alliance. Mayor Kohler stated the landfill Tax proposed by San Jose was discussed and San Jose is going to move forward with this. Councilmember Clevenger stated she attended a Jack Pack Meeting. She noted Jack Pack is composed of representatives from the Air Board, ABAG and MTC. Councilmember Clevenger reported on this meeting and requested that the Mayor bring up the disagreements at the ABAG meeting. Councilmember Clevenger stated the major concern is that the three major agencies can not work together. Councilmember Monia noted he had received no correspondence from the library on the expansion. City Manager Peacock stated the Councilmembers will receive correspondence the 1st meeting in April. In.response to CouncilmemberAnderson's question regarding the Finance Committee, Mr. Peacock suggested that the Council except the report and once approved then ask the Finance Committee to look it over. 10. ADJOURNMENT The City Council adjourned at 11:10 p.m. to a closed session and then to 7:00 p.m. on March 24 in the Senior Center Day Care Room, 19655 Allendale Avenue. 11." CLOSED SESSION on settlement negotiations, Teerlink Ranch limited bankruptcy. Respectfully submitted, Catherine RobliZard~ Minutes Clerk