HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-03-1995 City Council Minutes MINUTE8
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
TIME: Friday, March 3, 1995 - 4:00 p.m, to 6230 p.m.
Saturday, March 4, 1995 -- 9200 a.m. to 4230 p.m.
PLACE: Administrative Meeting Room, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue
TYPE: Adjourned Regular Meeting/Policy Development Conference
1. Roll Call
Councilmembers Jacobs, Moran, Tucker, Wolfe and Mayor Burger were
present at 4:00 p.m.
2. Report of City Clerk on Posting of Agenda
Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was
properly posted on February 24. The notice of adjournment from the
March I Council meeting was properly posted on March 2.
1. To what extent should the City Council revise its vision statement
developed in November 1994 and reviewed with the community in
January 19957
No intention of redirecting focus of community
Commercial Areas
Delete Desianated/Currentlv Desiunated?
Yes - "High quality/basic services"
Part of "And Proud of This Special City" (last par.)? yes
want existing commercial to be vibrant
Public comment - intent to maintain single family community
2. Should the City prepare, or have prepared by outside consultants,
specific plans provldingguidelines for development, improvement,
neighborhood protection and long range planning for the following
areas?
a. Mountain Winery property
For sale'
Development potential
Help to have plan in advance
Specific to site
Options:
1) staff - cheaper', longer, $75K, 12-18 mos.
2) outside preparation - more expensive, shorter
$100-150K, 9-12 mos.
b. North Saratoga Avenue corridor from cox Avenue to city
limits
Guidelines to protect residential character
Identify unique character
options:
1) staff $15-25K
2) outside - $50-75K
c. Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road "gateway corridor" from the Southern
Pacific Railroad R/W to Prospect Road
Options:
1) staff - $25-50K, 9-12 mos.
2) outside - $50-100K, 6-9 mos.
3) Development "Charette"
Abbreviated process
hours/5K(?)
Not necessarily local architects
Only those in area invited to attend
GGG wants plan for Mountain Winery
Public involved from beginning
City Council Minu~es 2 March 3-4, 1995
SChOOlS impact must be considered
Charette in Los Gatos involved vacant land.
Jacobs
1) · Mountain Winery informal process preferable
2) N. Saratoga Ave. Specific Plan
3) S/S Gateway - Charette
- potential for change
-.collaborative process
- need innovation
- likes planners/arch.
Wolfe
What we hear in Charette may apply elsewhere
(Design Guidelines)
S/S looks tacky, bad circulation, people don't believe its
Saratoga - not pedestrian friendly
Moran
Meeting with neighbors/business in area before Charette may
help define what we want to accomplish
Curtis
Professionals in Charette acted as "facilitators of the group"
Burqer
Likes Charette for S/S
Not opposed to N. Sar. Specific Plan but maybe not now
(priorities)
Jacobs
N. area staff plan should be done now - immediate problems
S/S has needed work for long time
Wolfe
Bus. Dev. Council is to enhance existing - not expand
N. Saratoga Avenue - staff plan
Moran
N. Saratoga - informal process first - find out if General
Plan still applies,
S/S eyesore. Wants goals defined by informal meeting
before Charette
Mtn. Winery - Guidelines
CONSENSUS
, Mtn. Winery - Guidelines/Informal
, N. Saratoga Avenue - White paper option
, s/s Gateway - Charette (lst step in a specific plan process) to
identify design changes, land use, circulation, innovation
Priorities
S/S } may overlap' in time
Mtn.' Winery }
N. Saratoga )
Mtn. Winery - informal guidelines
for prospective development
minimum of 1 year for any development to be approved
3. Should the City add a revision of the Land Use Element.of the
General Plan to the Community Development Department Work Program
and should it take precedence over other projects?
Moran
Likes staff recommendation Priority ~2. Should take a look at general
plan, not necessarily make changes.
Curtis
Typically land use element and other elements updated every few years.
City council Minutes 3 March 3-4, 1995
It's been 10 years since last update. Wants to "look at it" to assure
reflects current policy.
Wolfe
Land use should remain generally the same.
Jacobs
No sweeping general changes but some specific changes may be
appropriate (Oddfellows)
4.'.What additional parks and recreational facilities are needed to
satisfy the future needs of Saratogaresldents?
Tucker
Staff report thorough but something left out (Passive recreation)
Check Los Gatos re. their survey. How they did it.
Wolfe
Is their need for more passive parks?
Perlin
1st check active needs - then all else falls in line.
Jacobs
Parks & Rec falling behind; facilities need replacement - inadequate,
parks overburdened in some places, under utilized in others; in long
run, need more active facilities. In favor or improving/expanding park
system. Citizens want more, but not in their neighborhood.
Peacock ·
Today women are more involved' so greater use, even though youth
population is less.
Burqer
Active vs. passive, not new issue in Saratoga. Everyone wants parks
but not in their backyards, if active. Direction of staff study is on
point.
Moran "
Kevin Moran not good for active facilities. Need full support of city
for large active facilities (gym).
Public
Need more pre-school playgrounds - need collaborative effort with
schools.
Peacock
Need school contribution ($) for playgrounds.
Need long term maintenance guarantees.
School district is currently understaffed.
Jacobs
May want to consider "swapping" Kevin Moran land for other property, if
neighbors don't want it there.
Wolfe
Have staff study w/school the possibility of joint use agreements.
Tucker
Should have long termmaintenance agreements to protect against sale of
school facilities.
Public
Schools need more classroom space.
Tucker
1st step is to meet with Kevin Moran neighbors.
Burqer
Consensus for option #1 and to be aggressive in taking advantage of
opportunities.
Jacobs
City Council Minutes 4 March 3-4, 1995
Need plan for 21st century - too few and too old facilities.
Moran
Don't want to tax whole city w/o clear direction.
Tucker
Keep kids busy - out of trouble.
AIA has competition program for city designs.
CONSENSUS
Option #1
Be more aggressive in looking for opportunities.
Need architectural services (landscape)
No more community surveys.
Have staff quantify future needs.
Have staff prepare action plan.
Emphasis in joint partnership with schools
No more land acquisition Purchases - (dedication ok)
5. What is the current status of our relationship with the schools in
the community?
Moran
Could city have assisted schools in Silicon Joint Venture application
Should city meet more often w/schools? (currently 1/year)
Prefers meeting on regular basis
Could discuss our relationship
School Board Members - meetings are beneficial
Jacobs
Could discuss joint efforts w/others as necessary.
,Should set up.additional meetings.
Governmental levels Federal/State) on issues.
Burger
Such as crossing guards/traffic (matching funds)
Tucker
Support staff recommendation, keep annual
Moran
Meetings. Look for areas of joint effort. Every agenda should discuss
status of joint activities/efforts.
Peacock
Internet is vehicle for city/school communication.
City does not supervise crossing guards - school does.
City will designate council liaison to school district.
6. Should the City reconsider funding certain celebration and
recognition events which were eliminated in budget cuts in 19937
Carolvn
$7,700 cost to fund those previously cut.'
Celebrate Saratoga - city contributions are in-kind support = $21K.
Benefit to city is indirect and some direct in form of sales tax.
Total cost of parade = $10K. Will be higher next year.
$3K would be appropriation from 95/96-budget.
* If there is $ available in budget, the activities will be restored
to extent feasible.
Burqer
Wants to reinstate because of intangible benefits to City. If $ is not
available in budget, there are alternative approaches
(donations/potluck)
Tucker
Concerned about appreciation picnic for only 1 commission, sponsor, by
city.
City council Minutes 5 March 3-4, 1995
Burqer
Actually its recognition for Public Safety Employees
Jacobs
Direct staff to look for money saving alternatives.
* If there is $ available, activities should be restored, but look
for innovative cost alternatives. Look for cost sharing.
, Recognition events are important in some form.
7. What is the status of pr~vatization of functions and services
offered by the City, and what studies are .being conducted for
feasibility of further privatizing?
Jacobs
How cost effective is it? Any studies done?
Peacock
Phoenix encourages public/private competition.
No particular general cost/benefit studies exist.
Have reviewed cost/benefits in Saratoga for various services.
Tucker
, Should keep options open.
Wolfe
Takes constant study
, Continue to study.
Jacobs
Joint agreement with other cities?
Peacock
Rubbish, traffic signal maintenance, NPDES.
'Perlin
Looking at possible joint street sweeping.
Fleet maintenance is currently good. They pick up and return vehicles.
Looking at payroll. preparation through contracting.
Looking at further landscape maintenance by contract.
Perlin
"Flip side" to privatization is city may contract out its services.
Peacock
In-house custodial functions are necessary. Hours are staggered for
night meetings.
Wolfe'
Have LOCC/NLC done studies on privatization?
Moran
* Have Finance committee review status of privatization and work
with staff.
Peacock
Always need to look at cost of bringing service back in-house. .More
contract cities in Southern California so more contract .vendors
available there.
S. Should the City go forward with a Youth Master Plan?
Tucker
Need to identify youth needs
Work w/school board, Youth Commission to help identify
Have school children participate
City Cotlncil Minutes 6 March 3-4, 1995
,Identify and include all stakeholders.
Get stakeholders to lead the project. City should be facilitator.
Steering Committee
How do we identify needs/problems?
More crisis preventative.
Should celebrate our youth, encourage/support youth.
Master plan can incorporate #'s 4 & 5 - collaborate w/schools to
achieve goals
Include commercial/religious communities
Identifyconstraints/opportunities for youth master plan.
YMCA/United Way, Sheriff
City's role is tobring all stakeholders together/publiCize activities
and services currently available.
City can endorse stakeholders' program
Serve as catalyst
, Invite stakeholders to townhall meeting to determine
interests/needs.
Townhall meeting in-July? Sept? Oct?
Have Youth Commission involved in smaller groups at townhall meeting
Preliminary meetings before townhall meeting?
Joan/Gillian/Karen to coordinate
9. Should the City continue to administer and operate the Landscaping
and Lighting Assessment District LLA-1 and if so, under what
conditions?
1) Should zone boundaries be modified according to benefit
derived?
Perlin
Zone I Recommend 4 parcels on Gordon Ct be given -0- assessment or
removed from zone 1 (no benefit from medians on Manor Dr.) or be placed
in separate zone
Zone 2 Frontage landscaping on Cox is the benefit.' Seems properly
defined.
Zone 3 Greenbriar Landscape Dist :seems properly defined.
Zone 4 Quito Lighting District - :recommend realignment.
Zone 5 Azule Lighting -' Recommend removal of commercial.
Zone 6 Sarahill Lighting Dist. -seems properly defined.
Zone 7 Village Residential Lighting - most frustrating.
Propose disassemble Zone 7 and create 4 separate zones.
Zone 9 is properly defined.
Zone 10 Tricia Woods - properly defined.
Zone 11 Arroyo de Saratoga -entry sign and Landscaping on Via Monte.
Zone 12 Leuter Court - properly defined.
Zone 13 Cabernet - properly defined.
Zone 14 Cunningham - properly defined.
Zone 15 Bonnet Way - remove 4 parcels at end of Holiday Ct.
(recommended)
Zone 16 Beauchamps - properly defined.
Zone 17 Sunland Park - properly defined.
Zone 18 Glasgow Ct. - properly defined.
city council Minutes 7 March 3-4, 1995
Zone 22 Prides Crossing - proposed to adjust to delete Saratoga
Woods Park and add part of Glenbrae.
Zone 24 Village commercial - no changes recommended.
Perlin
Zone benefits seem properly defined within each zone.
Citywide District
What should it include?
10,576 parcels citywide
Divide current benefits by 10,576
$12-$15 per parcel per year
Divide current benefits +Hakone + park + all medians/parkways by 10,576
= $80-$90 per parcel per year.
If zone is abandoned, tax goes to county - but if it is kept in zone,
increment remains to city for Zones 1-8.
Tucker
Would not be in favor of citywide w/o a vote.
In favor of resolving inequities identified.
Jacobs
Citywide should go to vote.
Burqer
Discreet inequities is separate issue from citywide
Should phase out LLA zones over time?
Wolfe
Question of whether homeowners will take over the work.
Moran
System is not perfect but should continue
Jacobs
For vote on citywide or just abandon.
Burqer
Adjustments would create uproar.
Leave Zones the same but deannex.
,
Zone ~ No change
Zone 2 No change
Zone 3 Add Yuba Ct.
Zone 4 No change
Zone 5 Annex Ted Ct.
Zone 7 Divide into 4 & zero out the rest
Zone 11 'Leave it alone - no change
Zone 12-14 No change
Zone 15 No change
Zone 16-18 No change
Zone 22 Deannex Sarawoods & add Glenbrae
10. What sort of capital improvements should be made to the Civic
Theatre and how could the City raise additional revenues to pay
for them?
Perlin
Surcharge on tickets
Surcharge on rental rates
20,000 tickets sold annually
Peacock
Surcharge on Montalvo/Mtn. Winery?
Revenue could go into enterprise fund/capital improvements fund
Tucker/Moran
Want to initially use $ for theatre.
City Council Minutes 8 March 3-4, 1995
Burqer
* Use $ for upgrade/improvement/maintenance of city facilities. No
guarantee that improvements will occur.
, Identify areas of responsibility of theatre groups.
Look into city-wide admissions tax?
Montalvo & Mountain winery are drain on services
$1.00 surcharge on tickets if legally allowed, will begin July 1,
1995.
11. What steps should the City be taking in the next two years to
further its goal of building a collaborative community?
* Accept staff recommendations.
12. What ~teps should the City be taking to continue its efforts to
promote business and economic developmentin Saratoga2
Wolfe
Expand best asset (village)
Capitaiize on what we have (culture/restaurants)
Create Business Improvement Assessment
Jacobs
Need to hire economic development person to move forward
Would enhance revenues to pay salary and more
Wolfe
Businesses want lots of things done.
We need person, maybe contract or part time.
Need to get buy-in from Chamber and need to motivate Chamber
and keep them motivated.
Need either better mix of businesses or emphasize what is here.
Tucker
Need to focus on what Saratoga's identity is commercially.
* Get core group together, then hire consultant, then move forward
with economic plan (strategies/goals)
Chamber president as business owner should head core group.
Get commercial, property owners, other business person
7-9 persons.
13. TO what extent should the City upgrade its data processing
capabilities in order to provide current technology and a more
efficient and useful flnanclal accounting system?
* Accept manager's recommendation for consideration as part of
budget.
* Continue researching network upgrade.
The meeting was adjourned at 4:30 p.,m. on March 4.
y submitted,
Harry R. a
City Manager