HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-15-1995 City Council Minutes MINUTES
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
TIME: Wednesday, March 15, 1995 - 6:30 p.m.
PLACE: Civic Theater, 13777 .Fruitvale Ave.
TYPE: Regular Meeting
Pledge of Allegiance - 7:30 p.m.
1. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present: Jacobs, Tucker, Moran, Wolfe, Mayor Burger
Staff Present: City Manager Peacock, City Attorney Riback, City
Engineer Perlin, Community Development Director
Curtis.
2. CEREMONIAL ITEMS
A. Resolution commending Linda Davis for service on Heritage
Preservation Commission
TUCKER/MORAN MOVED TOAD OpT ARESOLUTION COMMENDING LINDA DAVIS FOR
SERVICE ON THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION. PASSED 5-0.
Councilmember Tucker noted that Ms. Davis also volunteered her
services last year for the SASCC retreat and should be commended
for this.
3. Report of City Clezk on Posting of Agenda
Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting
was properly posted on March 10.
City Manager Peacock requested permission to add an item to the
agenda as an urgency action. This is a resolution of the City
Council approving a designation of applicant agent resolution with
the State, for the purposes of filing claims for the recovery of
costs related to the storms of 1995.
MORAN/TUCKER MOVED TO ADD THE ABOVE RESOLUTION TO THE AGENDA AGAN
URGENCY ITEM DNDER MEW BUSIMESS. PASSED 5-0.
City Manager Peacock gave a brief update on the damage done by the
storms. He noted there were minor amounts of damage during the
storms in January, but the damage was worse during the last storm.
He noted crews were working 15 hour days to deal with a number of
probiems including trees and power lines down. He noted there were
road closures and part of Pierce Road is still closed. There were
a number of mudslides closing highway 9 and highway 17 temporarily.
Mr. Peacock noted on Friday afternoon he declared a local emergency
under the assumption that things may get worse and may need outside
help. He stated now they are dealing with the recovery stage and
will file a claim with the State Department of Emergency Services.
Mayor Burger stated staff handled the problem very well and are
dedicated to the welfare of the citizens. She stated the City
Manager and Public Work's crew should be commended and noted she is
speaking on behalf of the Council.
4. COMMUNICATION8 FROM COMMISSIONS AND THE PUBLIC
A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (limited to 15 minutes)
Mr. Richard Johanson, 12537 Saratoga Ave., addressed the General
Plan and zoning patterns of the City and hopes that both the City
Council and Planning Commission work together and uphold the
primarily residential community of Saratoga. He said approval of
the gas station on Saratoga Ave. was a bad decision and it is
inconsistent with the zoning ordinance.
Ms. Marcia Fariss, 18993 Saratoga Glen Pi., addressed an article in
the Mercury News regarding Cupertino's discussions on the possible
revision of their General Plan. Ms. Fariss read quotes from this
City Council Minutes 2 March 15, 1995
article by Cupertino Councilmembers.
B. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
1) George Buljan, resigning from Nakone Foundation
Board of Trustees.
JACOBS/TUCKER MOVED TO ACCEPT TH8 RESIGNATION WITH REGRET AND
DIRECT STAFF. TO PREPARE THE APPROPRIATE RESOLUTION. PASSED 5-0.
2} Relko Iwanaga, resigning from Hakone Foundation
Board of Trustees.
WOLFE/MORANMOVED TO ACCEPT THE RESIGNATION WITH.REGRETANDDIRECT
STAFF TO PREPARE THE APPROPRIATE ESSOLUTION. PASSED 5-0.
3) Gladys Armstrong, President, Hakone Foundation,
submitting the name of Daryl Becket to serve as
Trustee.
JACOBS/MORAN MOVED TO DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE A RESOLUTION
APPOINTING MR. BECKER. PASSED 5-0.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Previously-Discussed Items
1} Resolution making findings on Rubbish Disposal
Rates and establishing base rates for the city
WOLFE/MORAN MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 95-12 MAKING FINDINGS ON
RUBBISH DISPOSAL RATES AND ESTABLISHING BASE RATES FOR THE CITY.
PASSED 5-0.
B. New Items
1) Planning Cc~mlssion Actions, 3/S - Note and file.
2) Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes, 2/6 - Note
and file.
3) Finance Advisory CoI~mittee Minutes, 2/6 - Note and
file.
4) Public Safety Commission Minutes, 2/13 - Note and
file.
5 ) Ordinance . designating Warner Hutton House as
Historic Landmark (first reading and introduction)
TUCKER/MORAN MOVED TO APPROVE CONSENT CALENDAR B. PASSED 5-0.
C. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY
1) Amended Claim for Damages Submlttedb~ Green Valley
Disposal Company in connection with ratesetting
City Manager Peacock stated Green Valley submitted an amended claim
after their first claim was denied.
MORAN/JACOBS MOVED TO DENY THE CLAIM. PASSED 5-0.
2) claim of Masek in case of injury due to fall on
sidewalk
City Manager Peacock stated Mr. Masek fell in the street and the
street was a State Highway.
JACOBS/MORANMOVED TO DENY THE CLAIM. PASSED 5-0.
The Council proceeded to New Business, beginning with the item
added to the agenda.
City council Minutes 3 March 15, 1995
B. WildwoOd Park Improvements, CIP 955 - Approval of Plans
and Authorization to Advertise for Bids
City Engineer Perlin presented the staff report dated March 15,
1995. He noted at the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting,
neighbors expressed concern over the expansion of the picnic
facilities. He stated recommendations were unanimously endorsed by
the Commission, as Outlined in the staff report.
Councilmember Wolfe stated he appreciates the participation by the
Parks and Recreation Commission to bring about a resolution
addressing the concerns of the neighbors.
Councilmember Moran stated staff and the Parks and Recreation
Commission did a great job addressing the concerns of the
neighbors.
JACOBS/TUCKER MOVED TO APPROVE THE PLANS AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO
ADVERTISE POR BIDS. PASSED 5-0.
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 8:00 pm.
A. Request for General Plan Amendment to redesignate
approximately 3 of the 5 subject acres from Medium
Density Residential (M-10) to Commercial Retail (CR) at
12325 Saratoga Ave. The request also involves amending
the Zoning Ordinance in order to fezone the 3 acres from
R-1-10,000 to Commercial Neighborhood (C-N). An
Environmental Initial Study, as required by the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), has been
prepared. (GPA-94-002, AZO-94-001) (APN 386-23-041, 042
& 059) (Developer, KOSICH)
City Manager Peacock noted there was additional written
communication from Joan Hubbard and a phone call from Marjorie
Burnett opposing the project.
Planning Director Curtis presented the staff report reviewing the
findings made by the Planning Commission as outlined in the staff
report. He noted staff recommends denial of the request.
Mayor Burger requested that Mr. Curtis briefly review the letter
from the applicant.
Mr. Curtis stated on March 9, 1995, the applicant submitted a
letter stating that the commercial land use designation and zoning
will~no longer be pursued. He stated the applicant requests study
sessions to discuss their options. He added further discussions
would be acceptable, but he would recommend denial of this
application so the commercial designation and rezoning comes to a
close.
Councilmember Wolfe addressed the City's housing element, noting
this is a State requirement and may lead to a change in
circumstances.
Councilmember Jacobs stated, assuming the application is withdrawn,
there is nothing for the Council to act on at this time, in terms
of the General Plan. He clarified that the reason for the
continuance as opposed to the withdrawal is because the new fees
will not be required.
Mr. Curtis stated new fees should be collected for revised plans,
because of the additional work by staff and the public hearing
process.
City Attorney Riback stated'the appropriate action would be to ask
the applicant for clarification regarding their March 9th letter,
which indicated they are no longer requesting a General Plan
Amendment. He stated if this is the case this would constitute a
withdrawal and the City Council could simply close the pubic
hearing and leave the Planning Commission's action to stand.
City council Minutes 4 March 15, 1995
Councilmember Jacobs stated if the applicant. is not going to pursue
the request there is no need for 8 public hearing.
Mayor Burger asked the applicant for clarification of the March 9th
letter before opening the public hearing.
Ms. Fanelli stated the applicant understands the Council will take
a motion to deny the application and is also aware that new. fees
will be required for a new application. She added the letter does
request work sessions with the City Council and Planning Commission
before any new application is filed.
It was a consensus of the council to open the public hearing.
The public hearing was opened at 8:15 p.m.
Ms. Marcia Fariss, 18983 Saratoga Glen PI., stated any current and
future opposition is not a personal issue with the Kosich family.
Ms. Fariss outlined her concerns if there was commercial
development on this property. Her concerns included traffic, loss
of privacy and the increased likelihood in crime.
Mr. Jim Shaw, 18735 Kosich Dr., expressed concern about the process
which may or may not take place at this hearing. He asked if the
homeowners will be part of the study sessions with the Planning
Commission and City Council. He noted he would like to see the
property remain Ri-10, and believes when the applicant requests a
work session, they want something else.
Mayor Burger stated it is a policy of the City Council to have work
sessions for major development so the applicant can get an idea of
what the City wants. She noted if the Council decides to have the
study sessions the neighbors will be invited and the sessions are
open to the public.
Councilmember Jacobs stated the purpose of the work sessions are so
the applicant doesn't have to keep filing applications which cost
money.
Mr. Larry Russell, 12391 Radoyka Dr., expressed concerned about the
neighborhood'ambience not being maintained with possible commercial
development. He stated the applicant should take notice of the
opposition and come back with a proposal for RI-10.
Mr. Richard Johanson, 12537 Saratoga Ave., stated there is a need
for consistency in the community with regards to low density
residential. He stated he has no opposition to the work sessions.
He added the zoning requirements in this area are Ri-10 and the
community does not want high density.
Mr. John Lundell, 18951 Ansley Pi., stated he is a chartered member
of the Saratoga Woods Homeowners Association. He noted he is
pleased to hear that the applicant. has withdrawn his application
for commercial development on this property. He stated he is
opposed to any other type of development other 'than Ri--10. Mr.
Lundell expressed concern about changing the area on the other side
of the road to high density development. He stated the General
Plan should be adhered to and they should work to retain the
residential character of Saratoga.
Mr. Morris Jones, 19472 Riesling Ct., stated while it is important
to have a general plan amendment process it is inappropriate to use
this process for just an applicant. He noted people buy their
homes based on the zoning for the area in which they live~ He
expressed concern about the traffic impacts on Saratoga Ave.
Mr. Robin Maybury, 12440 Curry Ct., expressed gratitude to the
Kosich family for rescinding their application. He stated he would
like to continue living in an area which is essentially single
family housing.
Mr. Mark LaForge, 18829 Westview Dr., stated he moved to Saratoga
because of the values. He stated the work session proposed by the
City Council Minutes 5 March 15, 1995
applicant is not necessary as the neighbors will only support R1-
10 zoning.
Mr. Art Bliss, 12430 Curry Ct., addressed the General Plan and
stated it is his understanding that the General Plan has to be
revisited and revalidated more recently than when this area was
zoned in 1970.
Mr. Bob Silverstein, 12441 Curry Ct., expressed concern about items
being discussed in the work session which are not consistent with
the zoning.
Mr. Curtis stated that anyone can ask for a zoning change on any
property. Me stated the process is available toamend the General
Plan when appropriate. He explained that the General Plan is a
policy document of the City and the zoning ordinance is the
implementing tool. He noted as circumstances change the process
is available to change the zoning. He noted state law recognizes
that change may happen and allows four general plan amendments a
year. He stated the purpose of the work session is to indicate
that there may be some changed Circumstances and other alternatives
may be appropriate, and before an application is filed there may
be some indication that the use proposed is not adequate.
Councilmember Jacobs stated by law the City is required to revisit
the General Plan and revise it to meet the changing needs of the
City. He noted the City of Saratoga has ma~e changes in the
General Plan from 1970; an example for this is the Paul Masson
site. He noted back in 1970 this property was zoned industrial,
but today this is not desirable or necessary for Saratoga, so a
general plan amendment was made. He noted during the work sessions
the Council cannot commit the City to anything, but can give ideas
to the applicant as to what will be acceptable. He noted the
applicant will still have to file an application and go through the
public hearing process.
Mayor Burger closed the public hearing at 8:45 p.m.
MORAN/TUCKER MOVED TO DENY THE GENERAL PLAN ~d~ENDMENT AND ZONE
CHANGE REQUESTS.
Councilmember Wolfe stated that continued open discussions is
appropriate because of the significance and location of the
property.
The above motion was passed 5-0.
The Council discussed the formation of the Kosich Planning Study
Group and agreed on two Councilmembers (Jacobs and Moran), three
Planning Commissioners (Commission to select), and the Community
Development Director. It was also noted that all meetings will be
arranged by the Community Development Director and will be open to
the public.
B. Review and approval of a Development Agreement between
the City of Saratoga and Greenbriar Homes specifying
development requirements for the previously approved 94-
lot, slngle-family resldentlal development on the former
Paul Masson Winery Site at 13150 Saratoga Ave.
Planning Director Curtis presented the staff report and reviewed
the concerns forwarded to the City Council from the Planning
Commission as outlined in the staff report. He noted staff
recommends approval of the development agreement.
In response to Councilmembers questions, Mr. Curtis stated that the
intent is to build the models as the perimeter landscaping
improvements are done. He also noted originally the project was
to be done in two phases and the final map was recorded in two
phases. He added that staff tried to ensure that the first phase
of development incorporates a substantial amount of the property,
in case the second phase did not get built out. Mr. Curtis noted
typically a development agreement is 10 years and 20 years is not
City Council Minutes 6 March 15, 1995
uncommon. He noted the subdivision map act is five years. Staff
felt the 10 year request is not unreasonable.
Mayor Burger stated that the Planning Commission indicated they did
not want to make recommendations, ]out have concerns.
Mr. Curtis stated the Planning Co:~mission did not make specific
recommendations but had concerns as listed in the staff report.
Mayor Burger also asked if grading can be done before final map
approval.
Mr. Perlin stated the City's sub-division ordinance prohibits
construction activity from occurring prior to recordation. He
noted it is possible that some activities may be allowed such as
fencing, erosion control, site clearing etc. He stated they draw
the line at grading.
Mayor Burger asked if the final map is in process.
Mr. Perlin statedI there are unresolved issues that need to be
worked out. He noted the intention is to have the final map ready
for the first meeting in April. He stated it is his understanding
that the improvement plans are completed.
Councilmember Moran asked about the comments from the Planning
Commission. City Attorney Riback stated the code requires a public
hearing, but it does not indicate that the Planning Commission must
take action.
Councilmember Wolfe stated he would like to see the landscaping
improvements as soon as possible.
The public hearing was opened at 9::23 p.m.
Mr. Pat Costanzo, Jr., Director of Land Development, representing
Greenbriar, addressed the two comments made by the Planning
Commission as outlined in the staff report. He added the'.phasing
and construction of the homes on Saratoga Ave. was taken care off
in the original conditions of approval. He stated there are two
phases and he reviewed what these include. He noted Greenbriar has
chosen to submit the final map in one phase, all the infrastructure
will be installed for the entire project and they will post bonds
for the entire project. Regarding 'the Development Agreement, a 10
year term is not unusual and there are benefits to both the City
and the developer. Mr. Costanzo stated Greenbriar intend to build
and sell the homes as quickly as possible. He requested that the
City Council grant the 10 year term.
Regarding the grading permit and final map, Mr. Costanzo stated
they hoped to have the final map before the Council at this
hearing, but did not make it. Be stated the next City Council
meeting is April 5th and they will lose two to three weeks waiting
for the grading permit. He .asked if the final map could be
continued at this time to the meeting next Tuesday.
Mayor Burger stated the final map is not on the agenda.
Councilmember Tucker stated she did talk to Mr. Costanzo about this
project.
TUCKER/JACO~S MOVED TO APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE
10 YEAR TERM LIMIT AND THE TIMIN(~ OF DEVELOPMENT AS CUtLRENTLY
REFLECTED~ AND INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING. PAS~ED 5-
City Manager stated the second reading and adoption will be April
5th.
7. OLD BUSINESS - None.
8. NEW BUSINESS
City council Minutes 7 March 15# 1995
A. Oral Communications (continued) and instructions to staff
regarding actions on current oral communications
B. Wildwood Park Improvements - see above
C. Ordinance extending a utility user tax at rate of 3.5%
with no sunset clause
City Manager Peacock presented the staff report and noted this is
not a public hearing but a required public meeting. He stated the
Council should take testimony about the proposed ordinance which
will be heard on April 19th. ~He reviewed the options the City
Council may take and noted the Council should instruct the City
Attorney and staff as to which ordinance they request.
Mr. L.M. Thorpe, 19550 FaNell Ave., stated he is against taxation
without representation. He noted when the utility tax was
instituted it was to be used only partially for repair and
maintenance of streets, and each year the Council has voted on the
continuation of the tax and how this should be spent. He noted
currently all the.proceeds are used for street repair. When the
tax was instituted it was supposed to sunset in 1990 and in 1990
the Council voted to continue the tax for another five years, and
now the Council wants to delete the sunset clause so they can
continue to tax indefinitely. He expressed concern about the
Council being able to increase the tax without input from the
citizens. Mr. Thorpe asked the City Attorney about the City's
legal obligations to put this matter on the ballot.
Mr. Edgar Vincent, 13617 Westover Dr., asked the Council to let the
tax sunset. He stated when this was discussed in 1990 it was his
perception that this tax would die in 1995. He urged the Council
to let this tax die and if additional revenue is needed to operate
the City, let it be a separate issue. He noted unless there is an
overwhelming desire on the part of the citizens to continue the
services that are funded by this tax, he would urge the Council to
preserve the integrity of the City Council and let it die as the
citizens were told. He stated this Council should preserve the
commitment made by the Council' five years ago.
CounCilmember Tucker stated after listening to Mr. Thorpe and Mr.
Vincent she would not be in favor of doing away with the sunset
clause.
She noted this iS a safeguard for the citizens and ensures that it
will be evaluated every five years to make sure the tax is
necessary. She noted with this tax the City is getting more value
for the dollar. She believes that roads affect property values and
therefore she would recommend that the tax be continued as it will
benefit all citizens.'
TUCKER/WOLFE MOVED TO INSTRUCT STAFF TO CONTINUE THE TAX TO JULY
1, 2000 AT 3.5 PERCENT.
Councilmember Wolfe agreed that this tax should be reviewed on a
regular basis.
Councilmember Moran also spoke in support of the sunset clause.
City Manager Peacock stated there was an entirely different Council
five years ago and if that Council had not kept the sunset
provision in this discussion would not be taking place.
City Attorney Riback stated no action is required. The above
motion was withdrawn.
Mayor Burger clarified that staff will bring back an ordinance for
consideration that continues to carry the sunset clause at the 3.5%
rate.
Mr. Thorpe reiterated his question about the City's legal
obligation to put this on the ballot.
City Attorney Riback stated the City does not have a legal
City council Minutes 8 March 15, 1995
obligation to put this on the ballot because it is a general tax
and not a special tax. He also noted the tax is in place and the
Council is continuing the tax. Me noted there is nothing in this
tax ordinance that obligates the funds derived from this tax to be
used for any specific purpose. He noted each City Council looks at
the tax and determines whether or not they wish to use the money
for any particular purpose.
Councilmember Jacobs addressed Mr. Thorpe'S comments regarding
taxation without representation and noted the citizens elect
· leaders who then decide upon taxeE~ to be levied. Me pointed out
that no federal tax is levied with a vote of the people, because
the representatives determine the taxes. He explained special
taxes and noted these would be put on the ballot..
Councilmember Wolfe stated this is a representative type of
government and the citizens have their say through their elected
representatives.
D. Resolution Declaring a Public Nuisance on Property owned
by southern Pacific Rail:coad off cox Avenue
Mayor Burger noted she called the City Attorney on this issue as
she owns stock in Pacific Railroad. The City Attorney assured her
that she does not own enough stock to make a financial difference
and could vote on this issue.
City Manager Peacock stated staff has been trying unsuccessfully
since November 1994 to have certain parts of Southern Pacific
Railroad right-of-way cleared of debris and trash. He stated
although this property is owned by Southern Pacific Railroad, if
the debris is a matter of public ~afety and welfare the City has
jurisdiction. He noted he is rec~esting that the City Council
declare this a public nuisance. He noted, so far staff has
received no response from Southern Pacific Railroad.
Mr. Peacock stated that palm tree debris can be taken to the land
fill or taken away by ordering a special pick-up from Green Valley
Disposal Co.
WOLFE/MORAN MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 95-13 DECLARING A NUISANCE
AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING. PASI3ED 5-0.
E. Reservation of Rights Letter with Pacific Bell to begin
preliminary, non-construction work on its fiber optic
cable system rebuild for Saratoga
City Manager Peacock addressed the revised letter to Christopher
Rasmussen dated March 15, 1995. He noted this is the first step in
Pacific Bell rewiring with Fibero]~tics. He added Pacific Bell
representatives would like to explain what this will mean to the.
community.
Mr. Granger, Pacific Bell, gave a brief report on Information
Superhighway. He explained the superhighway and how this will be
delivered. He presented material to the Council and reviewed
Saratoga's construction process as outlined in the material given
to the Councilmembers. He noted the new network will be more
reliable and in the packets passeit out to the council there 'is
information on the benefits to the cities.
Councilmember Tucker asked about the aerial poles. Mr. Granger
stated they will be placing electronics on the ground and the
residents will have some say in the location of these.
Regarding underground utilities, Mr. Paralta, Construction Manager,
stated utilities will remain either underground or aerial, as they
are presently.
Councilmember Moran addressed the :revised letter dated March 15,
1995.
City Attorney Riback stated he has been involved in the discussions
City Council Minutes 9 March 15, 1995
with Pacific Bell and the language change reflects the fact that
the aerial work which Pacific Bell wishes to leave in does not
require any permits from the City, but the underground work will.
Councilmember Moran stated the letter should read "This letter is
not intended to allow Pacific Bell to begin any underground..."
Councilmember Wolfe asked about the video dialtone. Mr. Granger
stated this will duplicate the cable system.
MORAN/JACOBS MOVED TO APPROVE ALETTER AUTHORIZING PRELIMINARY WORK
PENDING APPROVAL OF A FORMAL AGREEMENT. ON CONSTRUCTION, AND
CHANGING THE WOND'"ALL" IN THE AGREEMENT TO "ANY". PASSED 5-0.
F. Memo AuthorizingPublicity for Upcoming Hearings - Nelson
Gardens Williamson Act Cancellation
JACOBS/WOLFE MOVED TO APPROVE THE PUBLICITY AS RECOMMENDED. PASSED
G. Urgency~ item regarding filing claims with the State
Department of Emergency Services
MORAN/TUCKER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION. 95-14 APPROVING A
DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT AGENT WITH THE STATE FOR THE PURPOSES OF
FILING CLAIMS FOR THE RECOVERY OF COST8 RELATED TO THE STORM8 OF
1995. PASSED 5-0.
9. ROUTINE MATTERS
A. Approval of Minutes - 2/21; 2/28; 3/1; 3/3 and 3/4
(Policy Development Conference Notes); 3/7
The minutes of 2/21; 2/28; 3/3 and 3/4 were approved as submitted.
Mayor Burger amended the minutes of March 1st as follows:
Page 4, 1st line add "Joint Powers Agreement" after Library.
Councilmember Tucker amended the minutes of March 7 as follows:
Page 3, 2nd paragraph, the word "parities" should read "parties".
The minutes of 3/1 and 3/7 were approved as amended.
B. Approval of Warrant List
TUCKER/JACOB8 MOVED TO APPROVE THE WARRANT LIST. PASSED 5-0.
10. CITY COUNCIL ITEMS
A. Agency Assignment Reports
Councilmember Wolfe stated they have appointed a Steering Committee
to the Business Development Council. He also reported on the
Transportation Agency noting equipment and engineering changes to
the Tasman system has resulted in a $119 million r~duction.
Councilmember Moran questioned why, recently, there have been a
number of resignations from the Hakone Foundation Board. Council-
member Tucker stated they are restructuring the organization.
Councilmember Moran noted the Sister City Committee is now
accepting applications for the summer exchange program. She also
noted the Transportation Policy Advisory Board is working on their
final report as a body.
Councilmember Tucker stated she will be going to Oakland to attend
the Legislative and Governmental Organization Committee meeting.
She reported on the Santa Clara County Cities Association noting
a number of cities are going back to the National Conference, and
they will take back position papers on telecommunication and
transportation. She added that cities need to fax information by
March 21st on housing as there will be a group from the Cities
Association who will lobby for some changes.
city Council Minutes 1~ March 15, 1995
She noted the City Manager will send information to other cities on
the cellular telephones as this wa:~ discussed at the meeting.
Councilmember Tucker stated at the Sanitation District they passed
a policy that protects the City regarding annexation.
Mayor Burger stated she attended the Chamber of Commerce monthly
board meeting and they wanted to clarify to the City Council that
Celebrate Saratoga is separate from the parade. She also noted
that the Congestion Management Agency Policy Advisory Board is on-
going and should be put back on the Agency Assignment list.
B. General Council Items
1) Agenda items for adjourned regular meeting March 21
and meeting with Hakone Foundation Board April 11
city Manager Peacock stated there are no items to discuss on March
21st.
Councilmember Moran suggested addressing the Board's high turnover
with the Hakone Foundation at the April 11 meeting.
Councilmember Wolfe stated he will have a meeting with Hakone
tomorrow and will inquire if they still want to meet.
City Manager Peacock briefly reviewed the noticing'that was done
for the Town Hall meeting on April 1, 1995.
Councilmember Wolfe stated he talked to the Chief of Staff for
Assemblyman Jim Cuneen, and he would like to attend the Town Hall
meeting.
2) Other
Councilmember Moran asked if the letters she receives regarding
highway 85 are forwarded to the Highway 85 Committee.
Mr. Peacock stated most of the letters come from members of this
committee. He also briefly reviewed the further noise studies by
Dr. Geberkemper.
Councilmember Tucker stated she will keep the Council posted on the
results of these studies.
Councilmember Burger stated she will be at the City Hall on Monday
2p.m. to5p.m.
11. ADJOURNMENT
The council adjourned at 10:40 p.m. to the Town Hall meeting on
April 1, 1995 at the Community Room in the Library, 13650 Saratoga
Avenue.
Respectfully submitted,
Catherine M.
Minutes Clerk