HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-16-1995 City Council Minutes SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
TIME: Wednesday, August 16, 1995 - 7:30 p.m.
PLACE: Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Ave.
TYPE: Regular Meeting
Pledge of Allegiance
1. ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. Councilmembers Jacobs,
Moran, Tucker, Wolfe, and Mayor Bdrger were present.
Staff present: City Manager Peacock, Public Works Director Perlin,
Associate Planner White, City Attorney Riback
City Attorney Riback reported on the closed session. The City Council
did take final action on one item that was placed on the agenda this
evening because the item came to:their attention after the agenda was
posted and is a matter that required urgent action. The item was
approval of a final settlement agreement between the City and the
County of Santa Clara regarding a dispute between those two agencies
over the payment by the County to the City of interest which had
allegedly been accruing on certain assessments and property taxes
collected by the County on behalf of the City. Once that document is
finally executed by all parties it will be available in the office of
the City Clerk
2. CEREMONIAL ITEMS
A. Introduction and Commendation of Emily Marcason, Honor
America Essay Contest Winner from Saratoga Springs, New York
Councilmember Wolfe presented a history of the award and introduced Ms.
Marcason and her parents. He then presented the award, which Ms.
Marcason accepted. She thanked the City of Saratoga and presented
gifts to Council members and staff.
B. Proclamation on Adult Day Care Week
TUCKER/MORANTO APPROVE THE PROCLAMATION ON ADULT DAY CARE WEEK.
Passed 5-0
3. REPORT OF CITY CLERK ON POSTING OF AGENDA
City Manager Peacock reported that pursuant to Government Code 54954.2,
the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on August 11.
4. COMMUNICATIONS FROM COMMISSIONS AND THE PUBLIC
A. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Judge Eugene Hymen presented a handout of an article regarding domestic
violence he had written for the San Jose Mercury-News. He requested
that the Council send a team to the Council on Domestic Violence to be
held on October 20-21. Mayor Burger said Council members had received
the invitation which had been forwarded to members of the Public Safet~
Commission, Community Service Officers and the School Resource Officer.
She said the City will be trying to put together a team.
Gay Grant talked about the City's ordinance limiting each household to
three dogs or requiring them to apply for a kennel license. She said
the applicants for the license must show that they have sufficient
acreage and the neighborhood would not be impacted. Ms. Grant said
that no notification is giving for a hearing to issue such licenses.
Her neighbor has six dogs and has applied for a kennel permit. Ms.
Grant said that there have been complaints filed with the City about
this situation since 1992. She asked that Council reverse the decision
allowing kennels in residential neighborhoods. She read a petition and
presented it to Council.
Mayor Burger stated that she had been talking to Ms. Grant and is aware
that there is a problem.
City Council Minutes ;Z August 16, 1995
Councilmember Wolfe asked about past practice. Mayor Burger said the
ordinance was an attempt to limit the number of dogs. She stated that
the hope was that if people hadto go through the process it would
inhibit them from owning more than three dogs.
Staff clarified that the ordinance specified three domestic animals.
Councilmember Moran said Council' should ask staff to come back with
suggestions. She said this is an issue that needs attention.
Mayor Burger said staff would have a chance to review the ordinance.
Councilmember Jacobs said he had talked with Mr. Curtis who indicated
that the process is administrative only with no provision for a public
hearing; however, they do talk to neighbors. The permit does not allow
those with permits to run a commercial kennel. Staff will be looking
into it and Council might want to talk about it at some point. No
permit has been issued in the instance we are talking about.
Mark Waldron, resident of Saratoga, said Currently the ordinance places
a limit on barking. Three years ago neighbors moved in with six dogs.
They bark all the time, sometimes for an hour and a half at a time.
He said he has a difficulty with and is questioning the barking time
limit rule. They had found out that: there was an application for a
kennel permit and were surprised to learn there was not a provision
for a public hearing where Council could consider the litany of
complaints and they had to issue a license. After issuance of the
license and if the barking limit is exceeded the permit is withdrawn.
This seems inappropriate. He said he understands the need for kennels
but there needs to be notification and a public hearing. He said if
a resident wants a variance they have! to present their case before the
Council and suggested that a kennel has as much impact on a
neighborhood as a second story. He concluded that they are suffering
from 'their neighbor's desire to collect pets. He asked Council to
change the process to allow an opportunity where neighbors can state
their case and talk about the past record of the applicant
MayOr Burger said it appears there is a problem and said she has spent
time on the phone with the CSO.
Councilmember Tucker suggested a work study session to look at the
ordinance and make suggestions for changes.
Councilmember Moran asked if it were appropriate to ask the City Manger
to hold off on granting this current petition and ask the staff to
report back with suggestions as to what kinds of changes they should
consider.
Councilmember Tucker said the neighbors should be invited to any
hearing.
Mayor Burger asked the City Attorney if Council can ask that no permits
be issued.
City Attorney Riback stated that Council has the authority to do that
but it cannot be done tonight because of Brown Act restrictions.
Council can indicate that it is their desire that staff not move
forward on any kennel licenses then take formal facts at the next
meeting and establish a moratorium on the issuance of permits..
Councilmember Jacobs asked what the City Manager plans to do about the
permit applied for. City Manger Peacock stated that is had not come
across his desk and he would have to check the ordinance to see who
has the administrative authority. The granting of a .permit can be
appealed to the City Council. In answer to Councilmember Jacobs'
question regarding investigation of the application, Mr. Peacock said
they would consider whether there is a history of problems with this
particular household It would be an important criterion in choosing
whether the permit would be issued.
Mayor Burger suggested that they ask staff to investigate this
Cit~ Council Minutes 3 August 16, 1995
application very carefully within the confines of the current
ordinance. Council would like to review the current ordinance with
perhaps some suggestions from staff. The signators of the petition
should be notified of this hearing.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
1) Saratoga Drama Group, requesting Exemption from Ticket
Surcharge for Extra Benefit Performances
City Manager Peacock presented the staff report.
Roberta Savage, representing the Saratoga Drama Group, referred
Council to the letter contained in the packet.' She said they are the
only group of three working in the theater who hold a benefit. She
said it was her feeling that this group of theirs that comes is already
paying; they pay their rent for the use of the theater. By June the
city will have $20,000 for'the use of the theater. She said the two
groups they work with are trying to be a credit to the community. She
feels that $600 is about what they might not get if they pay the
surcharge and she hoped Council would change their mind. She described
the groups benefiting from the performances. Ms. Savage suggested that
staff change the ordinance to allow appropriate groups to h~ve the
opportunity to be exempt from the surcharge.
Nancy Anderson, speaking for two organizations, the Committee on
Homeless Women and Children of the Los Gatos/Saratoga American
Association of University Women, and the Adult Day Care Center, said
the drama group does this performance as a benefit to the community.
The extra shows give the City rent money to take care of wear and tear.
She said their organization already has to pay $7 per seat for rental
and royalty expenses and this would raise to it $8. They would lose'
$300 from each performance. She told what this amount would buy and
said she hoped Council would consider waiving this rule for benefit
performances only.
Discussion following regarding concerns as to whether this would be a
gift of public funds and whether to make this a permanent change or to
consider requests on a case by case basis.
WOLFE/MORAN TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM .THE TICKET
SURCHARGE FOR THE TWO BENEFIT PERFORMANCES SCHEDULED BY THE SARATOGA
DRAMA GROUP. Passed 5-0
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Previously-Discussed Items
1. Resolution on Abdullah Appeal heard 7/19
MORAN/TUCKER TO APPROVE ITEM 5.A.1 OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR. Passed 5-
.
B. New Items
1) Planning COmmisSiOn Actions, 7/26; 8/9 - Councilmember
Tucker requested that this item be removed from the Consent
Calendar.
2) Parks and Recreation CommiSSion Minutes, 7/10/95 - Note
and file.
3) Approval of Check Register
4) City Financial Report for June
5) Quarterly Quarry Creek Trust Report - Receive and file.
WOLFE/TUCKER TO APPROVE ITEMS 5.B.2 THROUGH 5. Passed 5-0
1) Planning Commission Actions, 7/26; 8/9
\
City Council Hinutes 4 August 16# 2995
Councilmember Tucker congratulated James Walgren for passing the AICP
certificate.
TUCKER/MORAN TO APPROVE ITEM 5.B.1. Passed
C, CLAIMS AGAINST ~'n~ CITY - None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - None.
7. OLD BUSINESS - None.
8. NEW BUSINESS
A. Oral Communications (cont:Lnued) and instructions to staff
regarding actions on current oral communications - None.
B. West Valley Hillsides Joint Planning Review - Draft Work
Program
Associate Planner White presented the staff report.
Councilmember Wolfe asked how the Sweeney Bill would affect the JPA if
it were to pass. Mr. White said that without knowing the exact
language and desires of other communities it was difficult to say.
Councilmember Wolfe asked if it would require additional review. Mr.
White said he didn't know but he didn't want to create another layer
of review.
Councilmember Moran referred to the :staff report. Mr. White said the
only comment by the Planning Commission was that we would have to
consider additional noticing for projects that happen on boundary lines
between jurisdictions. Otherwise they were supportive of the project.'
MORAN/TUCKER TO ACCEPT TEE WORE PROGRAM AND DIRECT STAFF TO INITIATE
THE PROJECT. Passed 5-0
Councilmember Wolfe commented that he thought the studies that have
been done help protect our hillsides.
C. Resolution Repealing Fees ~c be Collected per Section 711.4
of the Fish and Game Code
City Manager Peacock presented the staff report.
Councilmember Jacobs asked what the fee was collected for. Mr. Peacock
said it is to pay the Department of Fish and Game for its costs of
reviewing negative declarations or t:IRs. He said the effect on the
City would be that this would be one less fee for the City to collect
and pass along.
TUCKER/JACOBS TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTIOI~. Passed 5-0
D. Modification of NUisance Abatement Ordinance
E. Ordinance Relating to Graffiti
Joe Oncay, City Codes Administrator, and City Attorney Riback presented
the staff report.
Councilmember Moran referred to the graffiti ordinance and asked about
how long it takes to remove graffiti. Mr. Riback said within
approximately ten days. Ms. Moran asked how this was different than
before. Mr. Riback said it is primarily a streamlining of the process
accomplished by not requiring a public hearing before the City Council
before the City Manager can declare a public nuisance.
Regarding the fiscal impact Mr. Oncay said it will save a substantial
amount and they can start recovering costs sooner. He said if the City
abates the nuisance according to this process, a lien would be applied.
He told Councilmember Wolfe the property owner is responsible unless
they catch the person who did it.
City Council Minutes 5 August 16, 1995
Mr. Peacock clarified for council that the objective is to remove
graffiti as soon as possible. Me said the main difference is that
currently the meter does not start running until Council declares a
nuisance.
Mr. Peacock informed Council that a list of names would be provided to
Council from which they could choose the Board of Appeals member.
Item 8.D. - MORAN/WOLFE TO DIRECT STAFF TO COME BACK WITH AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE NUISANCE ABATEMENT PROCEDURE AS DISCUSSED. Passed
0
Item 8.E. - JACOBa/MORAN TO INTRODUCE THE ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLYt
WAIVING FURTHER READING.
5-0
9. ROUTINE MATTERS
A. Approval of Minutes - 7/195 7/25
The minutes were approved as submitted with Councilmember Moran
abstaining on the 7/25 minutes.
10. CITY COUNCIL ITEMS
I. Agenda items for joint meeting with Planning Commission
september 12
1) Mountain Winery Development Guidelines
2) Discussion of Decision-Making Process on Recent Appeals
Mayor Burger said she would like to review the grounds for abstention
since there were many.
City Attorney Riback said there should be a reason given. - It should
state in the minutes if the reason is a perceived conflict of interest.
City Attorney Riback was excused.
B. Designation of Voting Delegate for League ~n~ual Conference
By consensus, Council selected Mayor Burger as voting delegate and
Councilmember Moran as alternate.
Discussion followed regarding the Council meeting scheduled for the
last day of the conference. It-was determined that it would begin at
6:00 p.m.
C. Other
Councilmember Jacobs asked when Council can expect a budget summary of
1994-95. Mr. Peacock said he had gone over it with the Finance
Committee. The reports in ,the packet tonight are preliminary. Be
answered Councilmember Moran s questions regarding the business license
and sales tax projections.
Mr. Peacock informed Councilmember Jacobs that they are scheduled to
discuss the final finan. cial statement on October 24.
Public Works Director Perlin reported on a neighborhood meeting held
in the McFarland/Devon area. He said a recommendation would be
presented to the Public Safety Commission. There are two sides, those
who want McFarland open and those who want it closed. He said he
thought they were trying to find a common ground.
Mayor Burger said she had heard from people who had been at the meeting
and there was a good feeling about how Mr. Perlin had conducted the
meeting.
Mayor Burger' thanked the city managers from the nine cities and the
County who nominated the library JPA for the Helen Putnam award.
C~ty Council Minutes 6 August 16, 1995
Councilmember Wolfe said he had attended a Milpitas City Council
meeting last night. He has been working.on a school facilities
committee for several months and had been presented with a
commendation. He said Larry Stone, County Assessor, reported on the
update and new policies in his office. Mr. Stone said he would be
delighted to speak to Saratoga's Council as well.
By consensus, Council directed the City Manager to prepare an
invitation to Mr. Stone to speak at the October 4 meeting.
11. ~d:~TO~NT
At 9:20 p.m., the meeting was adjourned to 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August
22, at Administration Meeting Room, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue.
Respectfully submitted,
f
Minutes Clerk