HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 09-028RESOLUTION NO. 09-028
Re: Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the allocation of fiscal year 2009 -10
Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian/Bicycle project funding
WHEREAS, Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section
99200 et seq., authorizes the submission of claims to a regional transportation planning agency for the funding of
projects exclusively for the benefit and/or use of pedestrians and bicyclists; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as the regional transportation planning
agency for the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC Resolution No. 875, Revised, entitled "Transportation
Development Act, Article 3, Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects," which delineates procedures and criteria for submission
of requests for the allocation of "TDA Article 3" funding; and
WHEREAS, MTC Resolution No. 875, Revised requires that requests for the allocation of TDA Article 3
funding be submitted as part of a single, countywide coordinated claim from each county in the San Francisco Bay
region; and
WHEREAS, the CITY OF SARATOGA desires to submit a request to MTC for the allocation of TDA
Article 3 funds to support the projects described in Attachment B to this resolution, which are for the exclusive
benefit and/or use of pedestrians and/or bicyclists; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the CITY OF SARATOGA declares it is eligible to request an allocation of TDA
Article 3 funds pursuant to Section 99234 of the Public Utilities Code, and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might adversely affect the project or
projects described in Attachment B to this resolution, or that might impair the ability of the CITY OF
SARATOGA to carry out the project; and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that the CITY OF SARATOGA attests to the accuracy of and approves the statements in
Attachment A to this resolution; and furthermore, be it
RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and any accompanying supporting
materials shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency, countywide transportation planning agency, or
county association of governments, as the case may be, of SANTA CLARA COUNTY for submission to MTC as
part of the countywide coordinated TDA Article 3 claim.
The CITY OF SARATOGA adopted this resolution on May 20, 2009.
AYES: Councilmember Susie Nagpal, Howard Miller, Jill Hunter, Vice Mayor Kathleen King,
Mayor Chuck Page
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Attest
Aim Sullivan, City Clerk
Chuck Page, Mayor
Resolution No. 09 028
Attachment A
Re: Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Year 2009 -10
Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian/Bicycle Project Funding
Findings
Page 1 of 1
1. That the CITY OF SARATOGA is not legally impeded from submitting a request to the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission for the allocation of Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funds, nor
is the CITY OF SARATOGA legally impeded from undertaking the project(s) described in "Attachment B"
of this resolution.
2. That the CITY OF SARATOGA has committed adequate staffing resources to complete the project(s)
described in Attachment B.
3. A review of the project(s) described in Attachment B has resulted in the consideration of all pertinent matters,
including those related to environmental and right -of -way permits and clearances, attendant to the successful
completion of the project(s).
4. Issues attendant to securing environmental and right -of -way permits and clearances for the projects described
in Attachment B have been reviewed and will be concluded in a manner and on a schedule that will not
jeopardize the deadline for the use of the TDA funds being requested.
5. That the project(s) described in Attachment B comply with the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.).
6. That as portrayed in the budgetary description(s) of the project(s) in Attachment B, the sources of funding
other than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the project(s).
7. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are for capital construction and/or design engineering; and/or for
the maintenance of a Class I bikeway which is closed to motorized traffic; and/or for the purposes of restriping
Class II bicycle lanes; and/or for the development or support of a bicycle safety education program; and/or for
the development of a comprehensive bicycle and/or pedestrian facilities plan, and an allocation of TDA Article
3 funding for such a plan has not been received by the CITY OF SARATOGA within the prior five fiscal
years.
8. That the project(s) described in Attachment B which are bicycle projects have been included in a detailed
bicycle circulation element included in an adopted general plan, or included in an adopted comprehensive
bikeway plan (such as outlined in Section 2377 of the California Bikeways Act, Streets and Highways Code
section 2370 et seq.).
9. That any project described in Attachment B that is a "Class I Bikeway," meets the mandatory minimum safety
design criteria published in Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual.
10. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are ready to commence implementation during the fiscal year of
the requested allocation.
11. That the CITY OF SARATOGA agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of, the project(s) and
facilities described in Attachment B, for the benefit of and use by the public.
MTC Programming and Allocations Section April 2005 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 2
Project Eligibility:
YES ?INO?
A. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? (If "NO," provide the approximate date approval is
anticipated).
NO
05/20/09
B. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? If "YES," provide an explanation on a separate page.
NO
C. For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California
Highway Design Manual? (Available on the Internet via: http: /www.dot.ca.gov).
$235,151
D. Has the project been reviewed by a Bicycle Advisory Committee? (If "NO," provide an explanation).
YES
E. Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for the project (pursuant to CEQA) been
evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (required only for projects that
include construction).
YES
F. Will the project be completed before the allocation expires? Enter the anticipated completion date of project (month and
year) April 2010
YES
G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has the claimant arranged for such
maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility provide its name:
YES
Funding Source
All Prior FYs
Application FY
Next FY
Following FYs
Totals
TDA Article 3
$235,151
$218,000
$218,000
list all other sources:
1
2.
3.
4.
Totals
$235,151
$218,000
$453,151
Fiscal Year of this Claim: 09/10 Applicant: City of Saratoga
Contact person. Macedonio Nunez
Mailing Address: 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga CA 95070
E -Mail Address: mnunez o(� saratoga.ca.us
Secondary Contact (in event primary not available) John Cherbone
E -Mail Address:icherbone a( ,saratoga.ca
Resolution No.
Attachment B
Page 1 of 1
TDA Article 3 Project Application Form
Telephone. (408) 868 -1218
Telephone:(408) 868 -1241
Short Title Description of Project: Joe's Trail at Saratoga De Anza
Amount of claim. 218,000
Functional Description of Project:
Along the UPRR corridor within the PG &E right of way, between Saratoga Sunnyvale Road and Prospect Rd
Construction of a pedestrian (bicycle trail 12 feet in width.
Financial Plan:
List the project elements for which TDA funding is being requested (e.g., planning, environmental, engineering, right -of -way, construction,
inspection, contingency, audit) Use the table below to show the project budget. Include prior and proposed future funding of the project. If the
project is a segment of a larger project, include prior and proposed funding sources for the other segments.
Project Elements: Environmental, Right -of -Way, PSE (Design) and Construction.