Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-12-2007 Planning Commission Packet0 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION SITE VISIT AGENDA • r� DATE: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 — Approximately 3:30 p.m. — 5:00 p.m. PLACE: City Hall Parking Lot, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue TYPE: Site Visit Committee SITE VISITS WILL BE MADE TO THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ROLL CALL REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA AGENDA 1. APPLICATION# CUP07 -0003 2. APPLICATION# PDR07 -003 3. APPLICATION# 07 -253 18681 Vessing Court Boger 14416 Oldwood Road Pitzen 20455 Herriman Avenue Metro PCS The Site Visit Committee is comprised of interested Planning Commission members. The committee conducts site visits to properties that are new items on the Planning Commission Agenda. The site visits are held on the Tuesday preceding the Wednesday hearing, between 3:30 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. jJ. It is encouraged that the applicant and/or owner to be present to answer any questions that may arise. Site visits are generally short (10 to 20 minutes) because of time constraints. Any presentations and testimony you may wish to give should be saved for the Public Hearing. During the Site Visit, the Planning Commission may only discuss items related to the project. The agenda does not allow any formal votes or motions on the proposed project or other matters. The Site Visit is a fact - finding meeting where the Commission may discuss the item and ask questions from or hear statements from members of the public attending the Visit. No comments made during the Site Visit by the Planning Commission are binding or required to be carried through to the formal public hearing where actions will be taken on the proposed project. P: \PC SITE VISITS \Site Visits\2007\SVA 121207.doc CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA • DATE: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 - 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Council Chambers /Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting ROLL CALL: Commissioners Manny Cappello, Rishi Kumar, Robert Kundtz, Susie Nagpal, Linda Rodgers, Yan Zhao and Chair Joyce Hlava PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: MINUTES: Draft Minutes from Regular Planning Commission Meeting of November 14, 2007 ORAL COMMUNICATION: Any member of the Public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three minutes on matters not on this agenda. The law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Planning Commission may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Planning Commission direction to Staff. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS- PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTION TO STAFF: REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on December 6, 2007 REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS: If you wish to appeal any decision on this Agenda, you may file an "Appeal Application" with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15- 90.050 (b). CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. APPLICATION# EXT07- 0001(503 -13 -067) Brunetti/Ho; Mt. Eden Rd. south of Villa Oaks Lane — The applicant requests a 24 month extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit approvals granted by the Planning Commission on October 27, 2004. The Tentative Map and Use Permit approvals expired 24 months from this date. The applicant was granted a one year extension of the Tentative Map and Use Permit approvals on October 25, 2006. This one year extension has expired. The 24 month extension will expire on October 27, 2009. The applicant was granted Tentative Map and Use Permit approvals to subdivide a 29.28 -acre property into five clustered lots with an average lot size of 1.73 acres. The remaining 19.49 -acre portion of the property is to remain in open space with a pedestrian, equestrian trail winding through the open space. Access to the property is to be via a cul -de -sac, which egresses onto Mount Eden Road. An emergency access road is proposed from Vista Regina Road to the cul- de-sac. The property has a General Plan designation of RHC - Hillside Conservation and is zoned HR - Hillside Residential District. (Chris Riordan) P:\PC Agendas\2007Wgn 121207.doc PUBLIC HEARINGS: All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. Applicants /Appellants and their representatives have a total of ten minutes maximum for opening statements. Members of the Public may comment on any item for up to three minutes. Applicant/Appellants and their representatives have a total of five minutes maximum for closing statements. APPLICATION# 06 -118 (503 -28 -008) Hashemich/Sarnevesh, 20951 Canyon View: (Continued from the October 24, 2007) - Applications for Design Review and Variance to construct an approximately 3,635 square foot two -story home with a daylight basement on a vacant lot at 20951 Canyon View Drive. The average slope of the lot is 39.7% sloping downward toward Canyon View Drive. Pursuant to City Code Section 15- 12.061, the average slope beneath a structure shall not exceed 30% slope. Therefore, in addition to Design Review approval, the applicant is requesting approval of a Variance as specified in City Code Section 15- 12.061(a) (Heather Bradley) 2. APPLICATION# CUP07 -0003 (397 -05 -086) Boger, 18681 Vessing Court: (Continued from the November 14, 2007 meeting) - The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to install an emergency generator for his residence. The generator would be located in a detached enclosed accessory structure. (Chris Riordan) 3. APPLICATION# 07 -253 (393 -41 -032) Metro PCS, 20455 Herriman Avenue: - The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to locate a wireless facility at the Presbyterian Church on Herriman at Saratoga Avenue. The project consists of a new cross structure with concealed antennas and a new equipment cabinet screened by existing landscape. The lot size is 4.22 acres and the site is zoned R -1- 12,500. (Heather Bradley) 4. APPLICATION# PDR07 -003 (397 -05 -042) Pitzen, 14416 Oldwood Road: - The applicant requests Design Review approval to add a second floor to the existing single story residence. The addition includes approximately 298 square feet to the existing first floor and a new, approximately, 1,157 square foot second -story to the existing 4,633 square foot single -story residence. The total proposed floor area will be approximately 6,088 square feet. The maximum height of the proposed building will not exceed the 26 -foot height limit. The maximum impervious coverage will not exceed the allowable 35% of the net site area. The lot size is approximately 45,564 square feet, and the site is located in the R -1- 40,000 zoning district. Design Review approval is required pursuant to Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.060. (Heather Bradley) 5. APPLICATION# PDR07- 0011(386 -43 -006) Yongjian Wang; 19278 Bellwood Drive (Continued to the January 9, 2008 meeting): - The applicant request Design Review approval to remove an existing 859 square foot second story of an existing two -story single - family residence and replace it with a new 859 square foot second story addition in approximately the same location. The residence will not exceed 26 feet in height. The net lot size is 14,712 square feet. The site is zoned R -1- 12,500. (Chris Riordan) 6. APPLICATION# ZOA -07 -0003 (City Wide) Neglected Properties Ordinance (Continued to the January 9, 2008): The Planning Commission will consider a draft ordinance to set standards for the minimum level of maintenance of private property in Saratoga. The ordinance would establish standards for (1) general property maintenance (e.g., overgrown vegetation, unsecured structures, or conditions of deterioration or disrepair that creates a substantial adverse impact on neighboring properties), (2) single family residential use landscaping, (3) multifamily residential use landscaping, and (3) parkstrips between sidewalks and City streets. The ordinance would also specify enforcement and appeals procedures. (John Livingstone) DIRECTORS ITEM: None P:\PC Agendas\2007Wgn 121207.doc • • COMMISSION ITEMS: None COMMUNICATIONS None ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers /Civic Theater 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (408) 868 -1269 or ctclerk@saratoga.ca.us. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102- 35.104 ADA Title II). Certificate of Posting of Agenda: I, Abby Ayende, Office Specialist for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga was posted on December 6, 2007 at the office of the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 and was available for public review at that location. The agenda is also available on the City's website at www.saratoga.ca.us If you would like to receive the Agenda's via e-mail, please send your e-mail address to plannin2Asaratoga.ca.us NOTE: To view previous Planning Commission meetings anytime, go the City Video Archives at www.saratoga.ca.us PAPC Agendas\2007\Agn 121207.doc • • MINUTES • SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 PLACE: Council Chambers /Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting Acting Chair Kundtz called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Cappello, Kumar, Kundtz, Nagpal, Rodgers and Zhao Absent: Chair Hlava Staff: Director John Livingstone, Associate Planner Suzanne Thomas and Assistant City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES — Regular Meeting of October 24, 2007. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Rodgers, seconded by Commissioner Nagpal, the Planning Commission minutes of the regular meeting of October 24, 2007, were adopted with the word "precedence" replaced by "precedent" throughout the document and with corrections to pages 17, 21 and 33. (6 -0 -1; Chair Hlava was absent) ORAL COMMUNICATION There were no oral communications. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA Director John Livingstone announced that, pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the. agenda for this meeting was properly posted on November 8, 2007. REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS Acting Chair Kundtz announced that appeals are possible for any decision made on this Agenda by filing an Appeal Application with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15- 90.050(b). CONSENT CALENDAR There were no consent calendar items. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for November 14, 2007 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM NO. 1 Application #MOD07 -0001 (397 -27 -010) Picheti /Cahoon, 18935 Hayfield Court (Continued to a date uncertain): The applicant requests Modifications to an approved Design Review approval. Modifications include, but are not limited to, the addition of stone to the front fagade, the alteration of proposed home's placement on the site, the rotation of the garage and additional windows on the right elevation. The property is R -1- 40,000. (Shweta Bhatt) Acting Chair Kundtz advised that Item No. 1 would be continued to a date uncertain. Motion: Upon motion of. Commissioner Nagpal, seconded by Commissioner Rodgers, the Planning Commission continued to a date uncertain consideration of the request for Modifications to a previously approved Design Review approval for property located at 18935 Hayfield Court. (6 -0- 1; Chair Hlava was absent) PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM NO. 2 Application #CUP07 -0003 (397 -05 -086) _Boger, 18681 Vessing Court (Continued to the December 12, 2007, meeting): The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to install an emergency generator for his residence. The generator would be located in a.detached enclosed accessory structure. (Chris Riordan) Acting Chair Kundtz advised that Item No. 2 would be continued to the meeting on December 1.2, 2007. Motion; Upon motion of Commissioner. Nagpal, seconded by Commissioner Kundtz, the Planning Commission continued to its meeting of December 12, 2007, consideration of the request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP07 -0003) for the installation of an emergency, generator at 18681 Vessing Court. (6 -0 -1; Chair Hlava was absent) PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM NO. 3 Application #PDR07 -0002 (379 -18 -075) Plyler /Miller, 14765 Fruitvale Avenue: The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct a new two -story single - family residence. The total floor area of the proposed residence and .garage will be approximately 4,874 square feet. The net lot size is approximately 51,160 square feet and the site is zoned R- 1- 40,000. (Suzanne.Thomas) Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for November 14, 2007 Page 3 Associate Planner Suzanne Thomas presented the staff report as follows: • Informed that the applicant is seeking Design Review approval for an addition to an existing single -story residence on property that is surrounded by orchards. • Added that the addition includes 1,100 square feet on the first floor and a new second -floor of 1,300 square feet. The total square footage would be 4,874 and the maximum height would be 26 feet. Described the property as consisting of 51,000 square feet in an R -1- 40,000 zoning district. The distance between homes and lots in this neighborhood is great. • Advised that the architectural style is Craftsman with materials including stucco, shingle siding and river rock. The use of stone and moss green stucco helps blend this house into its environment. • Distributed the material board and rendering of the proposed house. • Stated that there is a 42 -inch coast live oak on site and the second floor was specifically designed to protect the canopy of that tree. • Added that compliance with the Arborist's recommendations has been conditioned. • Reported that energy efficient appliances would be incorporated as well as heating and cooling controls for the home in sections to help conserve energy use. Existing mature trees serve as natural cooling and skylights allow natural lighting in the home to reduce need for electrical lighting during daytime hours. • Said that the 500 -foot notice was distributed and no negative responses were received. • Stated that the findings can be made in support of this project. • Recommended approval. Commissioner Cappello asked about the material of the garage door. Commissioner Rodgers pointed out that it is wood. She asked staff if the, 30 -foot tall house next door is fairly old. Planner Suzanne Thomas replied yes, it appears to be, although she is not sure of its age. Commissioner Rodgers said that it likely pre -dated the current Ordinance height limitation. Planner Suzanne Thomas agreed that this is likely. Acting Chair Kundtz opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 3. Mr. Michael Miller, Project Applicant: • Explained that his family moved to Saratoga in the mid -60's from Santa Cruz. • Added that the orchard is a functioning orchard. • Recounted that he met his wife while living in this house as she lived next door. • Said that they have purchased the property from his dad as it became too much for him to handle. • Stated that his neighbors are both excited and supportive about these plans to improve the house. .Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for November 14, 2007 Page 4 • Advised that his vision is to make room for his family of five without increasing impervious coverage in any significant way. 0 • Added that the house has been designed around a centrally placed family fireplace. • Assured that they have tried to maintain materials and reuse as much as they could. They have also incorporated as many green elements as possible. • Said that they intend to preserve and maintain the rural orchard and property landscaping. Mr. Steve Plyler, Project Designer, DeMattei Construction: • Said that this house totals only 4,800 square feet. • Added that it is set back 250 feet from the street and has an existing side setback on the right side of 32 feet, which is 20 feet more than required. • Stated that the top floor is set back twice the distance required. • Said that the 26 -foot maximum height limitation was met. • Advised that they worked around the trees. • Expressed hope that the project would be approved. Acting Chair Kundtz said that the setback is great but he questioned whether the existing narrow blacktop road could accommodate construction vehicles and parking. Would any road enhancement be required? Mr. Steve Plyler said no there is an area on site available for construction parking and the road can accommodate construction vehicles and equipment. Acting Chair Kundtz closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 3. Commissioner Rodgers said she could make all findings to support this application and thanked the applicant for taking the time to design something unique that fits into this site. Commissioner Zhao said she too could make the findings. She said that this is a nice design and she wished the owner good luck. Commissioner Nagpal said that she appreciated hearing Mr. Miller's courtship .story and how he met his wife as a neighbor. She. said she could make the Design Review findings. Commissioner Cappello said he could too. He said that this is a home that does not create bulk or mass. There is articulation. It is a very beautiful design. He added that he likes the garage and house doors as they are clearly of good quality. This is a quality project. Commissioner Kumar said he can make the findings and likes the incorporation of energy efficiency features as.well as the preservation of the orchards. Acting Chair Kundtz agreed and asked for a motion. Motion: Upon motion. of Commissioner Nagpal, seconded by Commissioner Zhao, the Planning Commission granted Design Review approval to allow the construction of a new two -story single - family residence on property located at 14765 Fruitvale Avenue, by the following roll call vote: Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for November 14, 2007 Page 5 AYES: Cappello, Kumar, Kundtz, Nagpal, Rodgers and Zhao. NOES: None ABSENT: Hlava ABSTAIN: None Members of the Commission extended their thanks to Planner Suzanne Thomas for her efforts on this project. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS Director John Livingstone advised the Commission that City staff had participated in a countywide emergency preparedness drill today. The event was really successful and offered a good training opportunity. Commissioner Zhao asked how many items would be on the December 12th agenda Director John Livingstone replied seven. Acting Chair Kundtz reminded staff that the Commission would appreciate a couple of scheduled breaks during that lengthy agenda, between Items 2 and 3 and later between Items 6 and 7. Commissioner Kumar asked staff if Saratoga has emergency broadcast capabilities. Director John Livingstone replied that the City has channel 1610 on AM radio. COMMISSION ITEMS There were no Commission Items. COMMUNICATIONS There were no Communications Items. ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING Upon motion of Commissioner Cappello, seconded by Commissioner Nagpal, Acting Chair Kundtz adjourned the meeting at approximately 7:30 p.m. MINUTES PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY: Corinne A. Shinn, Minutes Clerk • • • Consent Item REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No./Location: EXT 07 -001— Mt. Eden Rd Type of Application: Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals Applicant/Owner: Hanna & Brunetti/William Wai Yan Ho Staff Planner: Christopher Alan Riordan AICP, Senior Planner C� Meeting Date: December 12, 2007 APN: 503 -13 -067 Department Head: John Livingstone, AICP, Director t 1: V .ykk' • `.�. •" k `\' NQay�MYN4 a of e.Fol �.F „�• .1—F F F IQ 4 •• � F'' i S ` .� 6 °.�° F�F •� d 500' Radius �•. s, ,v ±ter jN "! 500 F Mount Eden Road - Ho Subdivision Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals Ho Subdivision - Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 a of e.Fol �.F „�• .1—F F F IQ 4 • F�i �--;- �'�� Eon Subject: � .i �i— MT EDEN RD APN: 503 -13 -067 °.�° F�F •� d 500' Radius v FV, q Mount Eden Road - Ho Subdivision Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals Ho Subdivision - Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 CASE HISTORY Application filed: Application complete: Notice published: Mailing completed: Posting completed: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10/03/07 10/26/07 11/28/07 11/25/07 12/06/07 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting an extension of an approved tentative map to subdivide a 29.28 -acre property into five clustered lots with an average lot size of 1.73 acres. The remaining 19.49 -acre portion of the property is to remain in open space with a pedestrian, equestrian trail winding through the open space. Access to the property is to be via a cul -de -sac, which egresses onto Mount Eden Road. An emergency access road is proposed from Vista Regina Road to the cul- de -sac. City Code under Section 15- 13.060(c) allows clustering of lots in the Hillside Residential District under the provisions of a Use Permit provided a number of requirements are satisfied. The plan addresses these requirements. The Tentative Subdivision Map was approved with conditions by the Planning Commission on October 27, 2004. This approval included the granting of a Use Permit for the proposed clustering of the lots as described above. 0 Saratoga Municipal Code Section 14- 20.080 states that tentative subdivision map approval expires after 24- months from the date the Planning Commission (Commission) granted approval. An extension of the expiration date may be granted by the Commission for a period not exceeding 36- months as long as the application for extension is filed prior to the expiration date. The current extension request is for the remaining two years of the total three year extension period. The applicant is working towards obtaining Final Map approval within the next year. The property owner, William Wai Yan Ho applied for and received.a one -year extension of the Tentative Subdivision Map and was approved by the Commission on October 25, 2006. That extension has expired and the applicant is now applying for a two -year extension. The application for the extension was received October 4, 2007, prior to the expiration date of October 27, 2007. Under the State Subdivision Map Act Section 66452.6.(e), the applicant will receive an automatic extension of sixty days or until the extension is approved, conditionally approved, or denied, whichever occurs first. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolution, which approves a two (2) year extension to the Tentative Map approval and the Use Permit approval to expire on October 27, 2009 and reiterates the original conditions of approval stated in Planning Commission Resolution No.. 04 -041 with additional conditions as described in this staff report. Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals Ho Subdivision - Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 L ], STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: HR (Hillside Residential) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: RHC (Residential Hillside Conservation) MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE: 29.28 acres AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: 21.8 %. GRADING REQUIRED: The proposed subdivision requires 11,425 cubic yards of cut and 10,848 cubic yards of fill for the new court and the emergency access road. Grading calculations will be submitted for each parcel as part of the Design Review process. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed project consisting of subdivision of a parcel into five clustered lots and retaining 19 acres of open space is subject to environmental review under CEQA. An Environmental Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration were prepared. After study and evaluation, staff has determined pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Environmental Quality Act of 1970, Section 15063 through .15065 and Section 15070 of the California Administrative Code, and Resolution 653 of the City of Saratoga, and based on the City's independent judgment, that the following described project will have no significant effect (no substantial adverse impact) on the environment within the terms and meaning of said Act if the recommended mitigation measures are carried out as a condition of plan approval. Project Discussion The parcel is steeply sloped with an average slope of 21.8 %. The site contains a large area of Md (moving deep landslides, more than 10 feet in thickness), which are restricted from development. The property is the site of a former spring and was in the past known as Springdale Farms. A riparian corridor traverses the property running in a north, south direction. The site topography rises above the creek on both sides forming two distinct, relatively open areas. The open areas are vegetated primarily by native grasses while most of the trees on the site are confined to the creek area. A notable exception is the upper areas of the proposed Lot 5 where Oak woodland exists. The parcel is surrounded by residential land uses at a relatively low density. The parcel has no public road frontage and access is provided from Mount Eden Road via a 60 -foot wide access easement. City Code Section 14- 20.080(b), allows the Planning Commission to grant extensions for a period or periods of time not exceeding thirty -six months. This code section specifies that an extension of tentative map approval is not a matter of right and the Planning Commission may deny the application. The City Code does not specify any criteria for granting extensions. The original tentative subdivision map approval was granted with conditions by the Planning Commission on October 27, 2004 for a two (2) year period, expiring October 27, 2006 and extended by the Commission at the request of the applicant for a one year period which expired Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals Ho Subdivision - Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 on October 27, 2007. If the current request for a two (2) year extension is granted, the map will expire October 27, 2009. 0 The applicants have been working on the Improvement Plans and the Final Map per the conditions of approval stated in Planning Commission Resolution 04 -041. These plans are being reviewed by the Public Works Department. The applicant has made this request for an extension to allow for additional time in complying with necessary conditions of approval stated in the attached resolution. A letter explaining the extension request submitted by the engineers for the applicant is shown in Attachment #2. Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Equestrian Trails Committee The project will include a pedestrian/equestrian trail that is an important link, in the City trail system. This trail has been offered as a public easement for use by the general public. The location of this trail was reviewed and approved by the Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Equestrian Trails Committee (Committee) prior to the October 27, 2004 approval of the Tentative Map. The Committee reviewed the request for the tentative map extension and the proposed pedestrian/equestrian trail at their meeting of October 16,. 2007 and recommended approval (Attachment 3). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolution, which approves a two (2) year extension to the Tentative Map approval and the Use Permit approval to expire on October 27, 2009 and supersedes the original conditions of approval stated in Planning Commission Resolution No. 04 -041 with additional conditions as described in this staff report. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution for extension of a Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals 2. Letter from applicant's engineer explaining extension request. 3. Memorandum from Pedestrian, Equestrian and Bicycle Trails Committee 4. Affidavit of mailing notices, public hearing notice, and copy of mailing labels for project notification. 5. Plans Exhibit A, dated September 2004, date stamped November 27, 2007 (originally date stamped,October 19, 2004). • Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals Ho Subdivision -,Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 • Attachment 1 • RESOLUTION NO. 07- Application No. EXT07 -0001 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA APPROVING A TWO -YEAR EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP APPROVAL AND USE PERMIT APPROVAL WITH AN ALL- INCLUSIVE LIST OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL . WHEREAS, an application has been submitted by property owner William Wai Yan Ho for a two (2) year time extension of a Tentative Map approval and Use Permit approval originally granted by the Planning Commission on October 27, 2004 in Resolution 04 -041 and extended by the Planning Commission on October 25, 2006 for a one (1) year period that expired on October 27, 2007. Tentative Map and Use Permit approvals were granted to subdivide a 29.28 -acre, Hillside Residentially zoned parcel located between Mount Eden Road and Vista Regina (APN 503 -13 -067) into five lots, or as more particularly set forth in Community Development Department File No. 03 -218 of this City; and WHEREAS; the approval for aforesaid Tentative Map would have expired on October 27, 2007. However, the property owner submitted an application for a two year extension prior to the expiration date pursuant to City Code Section 14- 20.080(b); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga held a public hearing on December 19 and granted a two (2) year extension to the aforesaid Tentative Map and Use Permit approvals; and Now, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows. Section 1. After careful - consideration of the tentative map and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby grant a two (2) year extension to Tentative Subdivision Map dated September 2004, date stamped October 19, 2004 prepared by Hanna and Brunetti, P.E. for the Lands of Ho APN 503 -13 -067 and marked Exhibit A in the hereinafter file. Said Tentative Map and Use Permit approvals shall expire on October 27, 2009. The same is hereby approved subject to the following conditions superseding all the initial conditions of approval stated in Resolution 04 -041. Said Tentative Map and Use Permit approvals shall expire on October 27, 2009. PERMANENT CONDITONS OF APPROVAL 1. City policy discourages gated private roads. No gate shall be allowed at the entrance to the proposed new cul -de -sac. 2. Permanent barriers (locked gates) shall be installed at the proposed emergency access road with specifications approved by the Fire Department. • Extension of Tentative.Map and Use Permit Approvals Ho Subdivision - Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 0 STANDARD CONDITONS OF APPROVAL • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 3. The open space shall be recorded on the Final Map as private open space, not offered for use by the general public, but intended for exclusive use by the owners of lots 1 -5, their successors, visitors and tenants. An open space agreement with the City shall be recorded with the recordation of the Final Map. The pedestrian/equestrian trail easement shall be dedicated for public use on the Final Map. 4. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted which provides additional buffer and fencing between the parcel 503 -13 -139 and the proposed access road. 5. Prior to Final Inspection of the Subdivision the applicant (owner) shall plant a landscape buffer on the adjacent neighbors property (if agreeable to the neighbor at 22501 Mount Eden Road) to minimize the impact of the proposed access road in terms of glare. A letter from the neighbor shall be provided to staff indicating whether a landscape buffer is requested. The adequacy of the landscape buffer shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director. 6. A storm water retention plan shall be provided indicating how all storm water will be retained on -site, and incorporating the New Development and Construction - Best Management Practices. The storm water management plan shall comply with all design requirements mandated by the current National Pollution Discharge Elimination (NPDES) permit. 7. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted and this plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Arborist and the Community Development Department. 8. Soil and Erosion Control Plans - The applicant shall submit a soil and erosion control plan which identifies the techniques for. minimizing the impact of disturbance on adjacent properties. 9. A statement of covenant, conditions and restrictions (CC &R's) shall be provided which addresses the long term maintenance of the on site storm water retention structures and landscaping along the. access road. 10. The applicant shall submit a construction schedule plan to the Community Development Director for review and approval prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The approved schedule shall be distributed to all adjacent neighbors. This schedule shall identify the various phases of development, construction of the cul -de -sac, installation of landscaping along the road frontages, and phasing of development of each building lot. The approximate number and size of vehicles involved in each phase of the development shall be identified in this construction schedule plan. Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals Ho Subdivision - Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 11. The applicant must comply with noise guideline associated with subdivision construction. Construction activities may be conducted between the hours of 7:30 am and 6:00 pm, Monday through Friday. Subdivision construction is not permitted on Saturday, Sunday or other holidays. 12. A notice of applicable construction hours with the owner's (applicant's) phone number shall be posted conspicuously at the site at all times. 13. The applicant shall -retain a qualified environmental consultant to conduct surveys of the project area and submit a letter to the Community Development Director prior to proceeding with any grading to determine if special plant species exist and if mitigation will be required. If special status plant species are identified, a Special Status Plant Species Mitigation and Monitoring Plan- will be prepared and submitted to staff for review. This Monitoring Plan shall be submitted to staff prior to issuance of grading permits. If no special status species are identified, then the applicant shall provide a letter to the Community Development Director indicating such information prior to issuance of grading permits. 14. The applicant shall determine if seasonal drainage channels are under USACE, CDFG and/or RWQCB jurisdiction and if necessary submit appropriate permit applications. 15. The applicant shall dedicate. a pedestrian-only easement that follows the route of the new road and the emergency access road to provide a trail loop. The existing proposed trail and this easement should intersect at two places: near the entrance at Mount Eden Road and the upper end near Vista Regina. The plans should be revised to reflect this additional easement. 16. A qualified ornithologist must conduct a protocol -level pre - construction survey for nesting raptors (including both tree and ground raptors) onsite within 30 days of the onset of ground disturbance or tree removal. If a nesting raptor is detected, an appropriate construction buffer must be established. The applicant shall submit a letter to the Community Development Director assessing the presence of nesting raptors prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 17. In the event that archeological traces are encountered during construction, all construction within a fifty -meter radius of the find should be stopped, Staff shall be notified, and an archaeologist retained to examine the find and make appropriate recommendations. Applicant shall provide staff with a contract for archeological services. 18. Landslide mitigation with all necessary permits shall occur as soon as possible prior to winter rains. - Implementation of best management. practices is required — specifically the use of siltation fencing erected downhill from grading activities - during any grading activities associated with mitigation of the landslide. 19. No construction traffic shall be allowed on Vista Regina. 20. Any proposed water retention basin shall be separated to the greatest extent possible from the Kocsis property at 13945 Pierce Road. The proposed distance shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director. Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals. Ho Subdivision - Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 • PUBLIC WORKS 21. Prior to submittal of the Final Map to the City Engineer for examination, the owner (applicant) shall cause the property to be surveyed by a Licensed Land Surveyor or an authorized Civil Engineer. The submitted map shall show the existence of a monument at all external property corner locations either found or set. The submitted map shall also show monuments set at each new corner location, angle point, or as directed by the City Engineer, all in conformity with the Subdivision Map Act and the Professional Land Surveyors Act. 22. The owner (applicant) shall submit four (4) copies of a Final Map in substantial conformance with the approved Tentative Map, along with the additional documents required by Section 14- 40.020 of the Municipal Code, to the City Engineer for examination. The Final Map shall contain all of the information required in Section 14- 40.030 of the Municipal Code .and shall be accompanied by the following items: a. One copy of map checking calculations. b. Preliminary Title Report for the property dated within ninety (90) days of the date of submittal for the Final Map. c. One copy of each map referenced on the Final Map. d. One copy of each document/deed referenced on the Final Map. e. One copy of any other map, document, deed, easement or other resource that will facilitate the examination process as requested by the City Engineer. 23. The owner (applicant) shall pay a Map Checking fee, as determined by the City Engineer, at the time of submittal of the Final Map for examination. 24. Interior monuments shall be set at each lot corner either prior to recordation of the Final Map or some later date to be specified on the Final Map. If the owner (applicant) chooses to defer the setting of interior monuments to a specified later date, then sufficient security as determined by the City Engineer shall be furnished prior to Final Map approval, to guarantee the setting of interior monuments. 25. The owner (applicant) shall provide Irrevocable Offers of Dedication for all required easements and/or rights -of -way on the Final Map, in substantial conformance with the approved Tentative Map, prior to Final Map approval. 26. The owner (applicant) shall submit engineered improvement plans to the City Engineer in conformance with the approved Tentative Map and in accordance with the design and improvement requirements of Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code. The improvement plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the appropriate officials from other public agencies having jurisdictional authority, including public and private utility providers, prior to approval of the Final Map. 27. The owner (applicant) shall pay a Subdivision Improvement Plan Checking fee, as determined by the Public Works Director, at the time Improvement Plans are submitted for review. Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals Ho Subdivision - Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 28. Encroachment Permits shall be issued by Santa Clara County Roads and Airports Department prior to any work commencing in the County right -of -way. All conditions required by the Roads and Airports Department shall be fulfilled prior to final subdivision approval. 29. The applicant shall comply with requirements of Provision C.3 of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit for Santa Clara Basin. Post - construction operation and maintenance of storm water treatment Best Management Practices (BMP's) shall be the responsibility of individual homeowners or Homeowner's Association, if applicable. Maintenance Agreement between the City and Homeowners Association shall be approved prior to Final Map Approval. The Agreement shall secure public access easement to each BMP for inspection purposes by the City inspectors. The Agreement shall be recorded into the individual deed records or shall be part of CCR's recorded prior to final subdivision approval. 30. A line of sight study prepared by a licensed engineer shall be submitted to verify that the intersection of access road. with Mt. Eden Road will be safe, prior to Final Map approval. 31. The owner (applicant) shall enter into an Improvement Agreement with the City in accordance with Section 14- 60.010 of the Municipal Code prior to Final Map approval. 32. The owner (applicant) shall furnish Improvement Securities in accordance with Section 14- 60.020 of the Municipal Code in the manner and amounts determined by the Public Works Director prior to Final Map approval. 33. The owner (applicant) shall furnish a written indemnity agreement and proof of insurance coverage, in accordance with Section 14- 05.050 of the Municipal Code, prior to Final Map approval: 34. Prior to Final Map approval, the owner (applicant) shall furnish the City Engineer with satisfactory written commitments from all public and private utility providers serving the subdivision guaranteeing the completion of all required utility improvements to serve the subdivision. 35. The owner (applicant) shall secure all necessary permits from the City and any other public agencies, including public and private utility providers,. prior to commencement of subdivision improvement construction. Copies of permits other than those issued by the City shall be provided to City Engineer. 36. The owner (applicant) shall pay the applicable Park Development fee prior to Final Map approval. The fee (subject to change) is $20,700 per additional lot or $82,800. This fee assumes that the fee in lieu of dedication of public open space will be assessed upon the property owner. 37..Prior to approval of the Final Map, the applicant shall file a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the Regional Water Quality Control Board to obtain coverage under the State General. Construction Activity NPDES Permit. Satisfactory evidence of the filing of the NOI shall be furnished to the City Engineer. The applicant shall comply with all provisions and conditions Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals Ho Subdivision - Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 of the State Permit, including preparation and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP). Copies of the SWPPP shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to Final Map Approval and maintained on site at all times during construction of the subdivision improvements. 38. All building and construction related activities shall adhere to New Development and Construction - Best Management Practices as adopted by the City for the purpose of preventing storm water pollution. GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT Geotechnical Clearance is granted for the Ho Subdivision provided that the applicant complies with the conditions identified below in the Geotechnical Clearance letter from Iveta Harvancik, Associate Engineer dated August 28, 2003 and revised April 20, 2004. 39. The Project Engineering Geologist and Project Geotechnical Engineer shall review and approve all geotechnical aspects of the final development plans (i.e., setbacks, roadway and building site locations, site preparation and grading, landslide mitigation measures, erosion control plan, and design parameters for roadways, foundations, retaining walls and other improvements) to ensure that all recommendations have been properly incorporated into the plans. The plan.review letter shall include a written geologic and geotechnical evaluation of the revised entrance road alignment, and be accompanied by a revised geotechnical mitigation plan and cross section (I -I') depicting the new alignment, probable lateral extent and depth of Landslide I and nearby Ols, and modified mitigation measures. The Project Geotechnical Consultant previously provided a recommended mix of expansive colluvium and granular rock material to help mitigate potential creep associated with expansive fills. The Project Geotechnical Consultant should confirm that the grading plan includes a note that satisfies the recommended mix specification (minimum percentage of non - expansive granular material). The plan reviews shall be summarized by the Project Engineering Geologist and Project Geotechnical Engineer in a letter(s) and submitted to the City Engineer and City Geotechnical Consultant for review and approval prior to construction of subdivision improvements. 40. The Project Engineering Geologist and Project Geotechnical Engineer shall inspect, test (as needed), and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project construction. The inspection shall include, but not necessarily be limited to: site preparation and grading, site surface and subsurface drainage improvements, and excavations for keyways, roadway subgrade, drainage trenches and foundations prior to the placement of engineering fill, drains, steel and concrete. The Project Engineering Geologist shall map geologic exposures in excavations and use the data to prepare a Final Engineering Geologic Map and Cross Sections of as -built conditions. Specific data pertaining to the depth and extent of Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals Ho Subdivision - Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 colluvium and landslides, and orientation of bedrock structure, shall be recorded and incorporated into the as -built drawings. The results of these inspections and the as -built conditions of the project shall be described by the Project Engineering Geologist and Project Geotechnical Engineer in a letter(s), accompanied by as -built drawings, and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final inspection of the subdivision improvements. 41. Prior to Geotechnical Clearance for lot developments, site - specific geotechnical investigations shall be performed on Lots 1 through 5. As part of these investigations, the applicants' geologic and geotechnical consultants shall: (1) review the data presented in the above referenced documents, and pertinent data provided in reports cited in those documents, (2) perform supplemental subsurface exploration and laboratory testing, as needed, to adequately identify the extent and depth of surficial materials (e.g., fill, colluvium, and landslide deposits), (3) evaluate the long -term stability of slopes on the lots (including artificial and natural slopes), and (4) provide complete geotechnical design recommendations for the proposed construction. The investigations should include, but not necessarily be limited to the following: i. Grading and Drainage Plans depicting proposed cuts, fills and drainage improvements shall be submitted for each proposed residential development. The plans also shall clearly depict building footprints, and landslide margins and construction setbacks from . potentially unstable slopes. The Project Engineering Geologist and Geotechnical Engineer should evaluate all geotechnical aspects of proposed development plans. ii. The geotechnical conditions in the building footprints (including driveways and. parking areas) on each lot should be explored, and representative earth materials (i.e., bedrock, colluvium, artificial fill, etc.) should be sampled and tested to provide engineering parameters for foundation and retaining wall design. The geotechnical consultants should specifically: (1) determine the thickness of surficial materials (e.g., artificial fill and colluvium) on the property, and (2) perform sufficient laboratory testing to characterize the density, strength, expansivity and other pertinent physical properties of the subsurface materials to below the depths of basements and anticipated foundations. Recommendations for drainage improvements should be provided, as well as specific recommendations for structural foundations, as needed. iii. We recommend that the project geotechnical consultant for individual lots consider the long -term benefits of providing piers with minimum reinforcement of four, no. 5 vertical bars in a cage and at least 8 .feet embedment into bedrock. The final foundation design. criteria should be based on a site - specific investigation of each lot. Detailed engineering geologic cross sections shall be prepared (at a scale of 1 inch = 10 feet) to depict the natural and artificial slope profiles (thus, proposed cuts and fills), locations and depths of exploratory probes, depth and orientation of various earth material units, and proposed improvements. Reference shall be made to final (as- built) geologic cross sections prepared by Pacific Geotechnical Engineering. • Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals Ho Subdivision - Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 iv. The results of the site - specific geotechnical investigations shall be summarized in written reports with appropriate illustrations, and submitted to the City to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and City Geotechnical Consultant prior to Geotechnical Clearance for each lot. v. The Project Engineering Geologist and Project Geotechnical Engineer shall review and approve all geotechnical aspects of the final foundation and grading plans (i.e., building setbacks, site drainage improvements and design parameters for roadways, foundations, retaining walls, etc.) to ensure that the consultants' recommendations have been properly incorporated. vi. The results of the plan review shall be summarized in a letter(s) by the Project Engineering Geologist and Project Geotechnical Engineer and submitted to the City for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit for each individual lot. vii. The Project Engineering Geologist and Project Geotechnical Engineer shall inspect, test (as needed), and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project demolition and construction. These inspections should include, but not necessarily be limited to: site surface and subsurface drainage improvements, excavations for removal of foundations and structures, and excavations for roadway construction and prior to the placement of steel, concrete and fill. viii.The results of these inspections and the as -built conditions of the project shall be described in a letter, and on revised (final) geologic maps and cross sections, and submitted to the City Engineer for review prior to finalization of the grading permit for each individual lot. 42. The owner (applicant) shall pay any outstanding fees associated with the City Geotechnical Consultant's review of the project prior to Tentative Map approval. 43. The owner (applicant) shall enter into agreement holding the City of Saratoga harmless from any claims or liabilities caused by or arising out of soil or slope instability, slides, slope failure or other soil related and/or erosion related conditions. 44. The owner (applicant) shall comply with all City Geotechnical review comments dated October 13, 2006 and shown in Exhibit B, incorporated herein, including but not limited to landslide mitigation that shall occur as soon as possible prior to heavy winter rains. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 45. Property is located in a designated hazardous fire area. 46. All fire hydrants in the designated hazardous fire area shall be located within 500' from the residence and deliver a minimum 1000 gpm for a sustained period of 2 hours each at 20 -psi residual pressure. Required fire flow could not be determined due to building floor areas and construction types not given, there may be a substantial increase of minimum required flow. (City of Saratoga Code 14- 30:040 [c], as required by Saratoga Fire District) Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals Ho Subdivision - Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 47. Fire hydrants: developer shows three (3) hydrants to be installed. Such hydrants shall meet the requirements listed in item 2 above. and Saratoga Fire District's specifications. �. Hydrant(s) shall be installed and accepted prior to construction of any building. (City of Saratoga Code 14- 30.040 [a]) 48. Roof covering for all dwellings shall be fire retardant and. comply with the standards established for Class A roofing. Replacement less than 10% total roof area shall be exempt. (City of Saratoga Code 16- 15.080) 49. Early Warning Fire Alarm System shall be installed and maintained for all dwellings. Early Warning Fire Alarm System shall have documentation relative to the proposed installation and shall be submitted to Saratoga Fire District for approval. (City of Saratoga Code 16 -60) 50. Automatic sprinklers shall be installed for all new dwellings including garage, workshop, storage areas and basement. An NFPA 13R sprinkler system. with a single 2.5" Fire .Department Connection (FDC) and 4 head calculation is required for each dwelling. The . designer /architect is to contact the appropriate water company to determine the size of service and meter needed to meet fire suppression and domestic requirements. Documentation of the proposed installation and all calculations shall be submitted to Saratoga Fire District for approval. The sprinkler system and underground water supply must be installed by a licensed contractor. (City of Saratoga Code 16- 20.165 for designated Hazardous Fire Area, all new buildings except accessory structures #500 sq ft) 51. Access Road: (applies to both new Court and emergency access road) a: Minimum width shall be 20 feet with a one -foot shoulder on each side. b: Unobstructed vertical clearance shall be not less than 13 feet 6 inches. (CFC 902.2:2.1) c: Maximum road slope shall not exceed eighteen percent (18 %) for more than fifty (50) feet. d: Finished slopes from level to 12.5% shall have at least a six inch aggregate base and a . double -coat oil and screening surface. e: Finished slopes greater than 12.5% tol5% shall have at least a six inch aggregate base and a two inch asphalt concrete surface. f: Finished slopes greater than 1.5% to 18% shall have at least .a six inch aggregate base and four inch rough- surface,(Portland Cement) concrete surface. Note: emergency access road should be shown to connect to Vista Regina, not Via Regina. 52. Driveways: All new or improved driveways serving a single dwelling shall be a minimum of fourteen (14) feet wide with a one foot shoulder on each side. (City of Saratoga Code 16- 15.200, as required by Saratoga Fire District) a: Unobstructed vertical clearance shall be not less than 13 feet 6 inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) b: Maximum driveway gradient shall not exceed eighteen percent (18 %) for more than fifty (50) feet. c: Finished slopes from level to 12.5% shall have at least a six inch aggregate base and a double -coat oil and screening surface. Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals Ho Subdivision - Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 • d: Finished slopes greater than 12.5% tol5% shall have at least a six inch aggregate base and a two inch asphalt concrete surface. e: Finished slopes greater than 15 % to 18% shall have at least.a six inch aggregate base and four inch rough- surface (Portland Cement) concrete surface. 53. The cul -de -sac at the end of the new access road and the turnaround at the end of lot 5 shall have a minimum 36 feet outside radius or an equivalent as approved by Saratoga Fire District. 54. Bridges: All bridges and roadways shall be designed to sustain 35,000 pounds dynamic loading. (City of Saratoga Code 16- 15.200, as required by Saratoga Fire District) 55. Parking: Provide a parking area for two emergency vehicles at the proposed dwelling site or as required by Saratoga Fire District. Details shall be shown on building plans. 56. Security Gate: Any security gate width shall not be less than 14'. Gate access shall be through a Medeco lock box purchased from Saratoga Fire District. Details shall be shown on building plans. If gates are electrically operated, provide emergency back up power or manual releasing mechanism accessible by the Fire District. (CFC 902.4) 57. Premises Identification: Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided for all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. (CFC 901.4.4) CITY ARBORIST In a report dated February 7, 2004, the city arborist made a number of recommendations and observations regarding the impact of the proposed subdivision on the surrounding trees. The primary recommendations are outlined below. 58. The combined appraised value of trees planned for removal ( #3, 7 -11, 13 -18, 47 -50, 55, 57, 68 -70 and 75) is $19,460. Mitigation for their removal shall include installing 46 of the 50 new Coast Live Oaks (24 -inch box size) shown on the proposed landscape plans. 59. The combined appraised value of inventoried trees planned for retention equals $442,080. In accordance with the newly adopted Ordinance, a bond equivalent to 100% of this value is required to promote their protection. This bond shall be submitted to the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a grading permit. 60. The retaining wall shown through tree #2's trunk shall be redesigned to be no closer than 10 feet from the trunk. Soil excavation for the wall's footing shall be manually performed within 30 feet of the tree's trunk. All roots requiring removal of two inches and greater in diameter shall be cleanly severed and immediately wrapped in a plastic bag secured by tape or a rubber band. Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals Ho Subdivision - Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 61. The plans should be redesigned to show the following grading setbacks from the trunks of the listed trees: ten feet from #23, 24, 26, 36 and 51 -53; fourteen feet from #25; twelve feet from #66; fifteen feet from #29; and twenty feet from #27, 28, 31, 32, 67 and 78. 62. The portion of Sanitary Sewer Line proposed within 25 feet of tree #54's trunk and 20 feet from tree #56's trunk shall be tunneled by at least four feet below existing grade through horizontal boring. The planned three -foot depth near the manhole is acceptable. All pits shall be established as far from the trunks as possible. 63. The line indicating the "Top of Cut" along the west side of the `New Court' road should be revised to correspond to the approved limits of grading. 64. The proposed grading shown on Sheets C3.1 and C3.2 beneath tree #72's canopy must be revised to conform to Sheet C4.10. 65. The proposed grading shown on Sheet L1.2 beneath tree #83's canopy should be revised to conform to Sheet C4.9. 66. The drain line proposed within proximity to tree #76 should be redesigned. I suggest establishing it. between trees #78 and 79, at least 25 feet from tree #78's trunk, 20 feet from tree #79's trunk, and 25 feet from the trunk of a non - inventoried tree immediately east of #79 (shown as a 40 -inch Oak). The trench for the line and dissipater must be hand dug where within the fenced area. All roots two inches and greater shall be retained during the process. 67. The trench for the proposed drain line beneath the western portion of trees #4, 5 and 6 shall p p P be manually dug where within 15 feet of their trunks. All roots two inches and greater shall be retained during the process and tunneled beneath. 68. The locations of the following trees should be surveyed and shown on all applicable plans: #3, 14 -18, 47 -52, 56 and 73. I also suggest the location of tree #66's trunk is confirmed. Impacts to these trees cannot be fully assessed until this is performed. 69. Tree protection fencing must be installed precisely as shown on the attached map and established prior to_ any demolition, surface scraping, grading or heavy equipment arriving on site. It shall be comprised of five- to six -foot high chain link mounted on two -inch diameter steel posts, driven 18 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 12 feet apart. Once .established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. 70. Where applicable,, protection fencing shall be established no further than two feet from the road and retaining walls, one -foot from the approved limits of grading, and eight feet from the `Entrance Gate' building and home on lot 5. 71. The existing property boundary fence along the western boundary should remain intact throughout the development process. Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals Ho Subdivision - Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 0 72. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the fenced areas (even after fencing is removed) as well as beneath canopies of trees not inventoried for this report. These activities include, but are not limited to, the. following: grading (both soil fill and excavation), surface scraping, trenching, storage and dumping of materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 73. Prior to commencing grading activities, the limits of grading shall be staked and reviewed on -site with the grading contractor and City Arborist. 74. The removal of the existing road surface for the Emergency Access Road shall be carefully removed to avoid damaging roots located immediately beneath the asphalt I suggest the hardscape is first broken into small pieces using a jackhammer. The pieces must then be manually lifted and placed on a loader. Any base rock covering visible roots shall remain intact. Please note the loader shall remain on pavement at all times and off exposed soil and roots. 75. The existing culvert along the Emergency Access Road by trees #56, 57 and 59 shall be carefully removed to avoid damaging roots. 76. At the start of grading (during the months of March thru September), supplemental water shall be supplied to all trees where grading or construction activities occur beneath their canopies. The water should be applied through soaker hoses or other approved irrigation system placed beneath mid- to outer - canopies at a rate of 10 gallons per inch of trunk diameter every two weeks. 77. The disposal of harmful products (such as chemicals, oil and gasoline) is prohibited beneath canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath canopies. Herbicides and pesticides used beneath canopies must be labeled for safe use near trees. 78. Great care must be taken to avoid damaging the canopies of retained trees. As such, I suggest the portion of canopies encroaching in the path of travel be pruned, as necessary, prior to beginning the demolition process or arrival of heavy equipment to the site. The pruning of trees shall be limited to removing deadwood one -inch and greater in diameter, reducing any heavy limb weight and clearing the path of travel for equipment and vehicles. All cuts four inches and greater in diameter must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to doing so. 79. The pruning and removal of trees must be performed under supervision of an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist and according to standards established by the ISA. Information regarding Certified Arborists in the area can be obtained by referring to the following website: http: / /www.isa- arbor .com /aborists /arbsearch.html. 80. Irrigation shall not spray beneath the canopies Oak trees nor come into contact with trunks of other trees. Stones, mulch or other landscape features should be at least one -foot from trunks of retained trees. Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals Ho Subdivision - Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 81. The irrigation plan should be reviewed for tree impacts prior to. approval. Irrigation trenches planned parallel to a trunk shall be no closer than 15 times the diameter of the closest trunk. Irrigation trenches installed radial to a trunk can be placed no closer than 5 times the diameter of the closest trunk and at least 10 feet apart at the canopy's perimeter. Irrigation spray shall come no closer than five feet from a tree's trunk. Please note any trenches for electrical lines shall be installed by the same guidelines. Section 2.' Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15 -90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. , The tentative map approval shall expire on October 27, 2009 if final map approval is not obtained by this date. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 12th day of December 2007 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully. conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City-Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date Extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit Approvals Ho Subdivision - Mount Eden Road Application #EXT 07 -0001 • Attachment 2 f Civil Engineers Planners - Land Surveyors Established 1910 Walter J. Hanna, Jr. P.E., L.S. Arnold Brunetti, P.E. September 26, 2007 Mr. Chris Riordan, AICP E C E Q V. E Senior Planner J� City of Saratoga OCT Q 20U1 13777 Saratoga Avenue CITY OF SARATOGA Saratoga, CA 95070 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Re: Ho Subdivision - Application #03 -218 Dear Chris: We respectfully request a 24 month extension to the Tentative Map as identified as; Tentative Map — Lands of Ho apn 503 -13 -067, prepared by Hanna & Brunetti dated September 2004, date stamped October 19, 2004. The commencement for construction is drawing near as both the Improvement Plans and the Tract Map have gone through final plan checking and is only waiting to be signed. Loose ends have been noted and.are being resolved. All geotechnical issues has been addressed and the proposed design has been approved by the City Geologist. We are making this request in order to obtain the necessary time needed to prepare for the required bonds and agreements. Countless efforts have put forth in seeing this project realized and it would be a loss to the community if the project were to be dismissed. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 408 - 842 -2173. Arnold Sincerely Brunetti cc: William Ho Ref 02063 7651 Eiglebery Street 408- 842 -2173 Gilroy, California 95020 -5122 Fax 842 -3662 • • Attachment 3 • Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Equestrian. Trails Committee MEMORANDUM To: Planning Commission Cc: Christopher Riordan, Associate Planner From: Pedestrian, Bicycle and Equestrian Trails Committee: Denise Goldberg, Chair William Brooks, Citizen Advisor Jim Stallman, Citizen Advisor Arm Waltonsmith, City Council Member Date: October 16, 2007 Re: Ho Tentative Map Approval Extension The Pedestrian, Bicycle and Equestrian Trails Committee at its regular meeting on October 16, 2007- considered the matter of the Ho tentative map extension and voted to recommend the approval of the extension as requested by the applicant. Thank you. • • • Attachment 4 • CITY OF SARATOGA Community Development Department V 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 (408) 868 -1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Saratoga's Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on: Wednesday, the 12th day of December, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Theater located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. The public hearing agenda item is stated below. Details of this item are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. Please consult the City website at www.saratoga.ca.us regarding Friday office closures. APPLICATION /ADDRESS: Mt. Eden Rd. south of Villa Oaks Lane APPLICANT /OWNER: Brunetti/Ho APN: 50343 -067 DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests a 24 month extension of Tentative Map and Use Permit approvals granted by the Planning Commission on October 27, 2004. The Tentative Map and Use Permit approvals expired 24 months from this date. The applicant was granted a one year extension of the Tentative Map and Use Permit approvals on October 25, 2006. This one year extension has expired. The 24 month extension will expire on October 27, 2009. The applicant was granted Tentative Map and Use Permit approvals to subdivide a 29.28 -acre property into five clustered lots with an average lot size of 1.73 acres. The remaining 19.49 -acre portion of the property is to remain in open space with a pedestrian, equestrian trail winding through the open space. Access to the property is to be via a cul -de -sac, which egresses onto Mount Eden Road. An emergency access road is proposed from Vista Regina Road to the cut- de -sac. The property has a General Plan designation of RHC - Hillside Conservation and is zoned HR - Hillside Residential District. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a decision of the. Planning Commission pursuant to a Public Hearing in court, you may be limited to raising only. those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing. In order for information to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed on or before Monday, December 10, 2007. This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The" City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor's office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out -of -date information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all residents potentially affected by a project. CITY OF SARATOGA Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 (408) 868 -1222 If you. believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Christopher Alan Riordan, AICP Senior Planner (408) 868 -1235 • E LegalAdvertisingbGcNotices ing certain very important t,�.; actions, however, the pen � General sonal representative will be required to give notice to Notices interested persons unless they have waived police or canan.) to the independent action.) The independent FOR CHANGE ANGE OF NAME administration authority will CASE NO. 0 CV0976 he granted unless an inter• CASE N0. 107CY097666 erred person files an abjec- SUPERIOR COURT OF CALI. tian to the petition and FORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA shows good cause why the CLARA, 191 NORTH FIRST court should not grant the STREET, SAN JOSE CA 95113 authority. IN THE MATTER Of THE PETI- A HEARING on the petition TION OF MICHAEL I. LEVY 6 will be held on DECEMBER 5, GINA LEVY 2007, 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 15 Peuli COURT FINDS that t Locatedat191NOrlh firsl St., San lose, CA 95113. LEVY & GINA L. IEVY YOU OBIECT to the granti• has /have filed far L decree ng of the petition, you changing name(s) as foi. should appear at the hearing lows: and state your objections Present mama: or rile written objections ANNE MARY LEVY with the court before the Prop and IFVI( hearing. Yaur appear..." 1THE COURT ORDERS that all maybe in person ar by your attorney. persons interested in this IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR of matter shall appear before a contingent creditor of this ..it at the hearing the deceased, you must indicated below m show file your claim with the court cause, it any, why the peti. and mail a copy to the lion for change of name personal representative should not be granted. appointed by the court with. Notice of Nearing on DECEM• . in four months from the date BER 11, 2007 at 8:45 a.m. m of first issuance of letters ROOM 107 looted at 191 as provided in section North First Street, San lose, 9106 of the California CA 95113. Probate Code. A COPY of this order to show The time for filing claims cause shall be published at will not expire before four least -once each week for months from the hearing four successive weeks prior date noticed above. to the date'attar hoadng an .YOU MAY EXAMINE the 11, the petition in the following kept by the court. If you newspaper of general tire.- are a person Interested lotion, SARATOGA NEWS, in the eslale, you may file printed in the County of with the court a formal Santa Clara. Request for Special Notice Dated: OCTOBER 29.2007 of the filing of an inventory /Mary Ann Grilli / and appraisal of estate judge of the Superior Court assets or of any pelilion or (Pub SN 111E 11114. 11/21, account as provided in sec. 11/28) tion 1250 of the California NOTICE OF PETITION TO Probate Code. A Request ADMINGMR ESTATE OF for Special Notice form l, ALFRED)OSEPH MERNONE available from the court CASE NO. 1.07-PR-161970 clerk. To all heirs, beneficiaries, Attorney for petitioner. creditors, contingent trade- 2785 PARV A CROSBY lots, and persons who may 2785 PARK AVENUE otherwise be interested in SANTA CUAA [P 95050 the will or estate, or both 408.370 -7500 of ALFRED JOSEPH MER- (Pub SN 11 /14.11 /21,11128) NONE. aka ALFRED 1. MER - NONE Il City P PETITION has been filed by / 4 ty KEVIN MERNONE AND `' GLENN MERNONE in the Legals Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. THE PETITION requests that NOTICE OF HEARING KEVIN MERNONE AND BEFORE PUNNING GLENN MERNONE be COMMISSION appointed as personal rep ." - CRY OF SARA706A'S sentative to "p inter the PUNNING COMMISSION estate of the decedent announces the following THE PETITION requests the public hearings on decedent's WILL and di- Wednesday, the 12th day or Gil,, if any, he admitted to December at 7:00 p.m. in the probate..The will and any lily Coum, Chamberslo<at- codicils are available for ad at 13777 FruiNale examination in the file kept Avenue, Saratoga, CA Is the court. 95070. Details and plans THE PETITION requests aie070. available De acs and authority to administer Community Development he estate under he Department, Monday t Independent Adminis,Jan through Thursday, 7:30 a.m. of Estates Act. (This author- . S:OO p.m. ll you have ques- ity will allow the personal lions• Planners are availably mpresentawe to lake many at the public taunter actions without obtaining between the boursof 7:30 court approval. Before tak. a.m. and 12:00 noon. proposed floor area will be Map and Use Permit All interested persons may approximately 6,088 square approvals granted by the appear and be heard at the feet. The maximum height of Planning Commission on have time and place. If you the proposed building will October 27, 2004. The challenge a decision of the not exceed the 26 -fool Tentative Map and Use Planning Commission pun• height limit. The maximum Permit approvals expired 24 suant to a public hearing in impervious coverage will not months form this date. The court, you may Is limited to exceed the allowable 35% of applicant was granted a one raising only those issues you the net site area. The lot size year extension of the or someone else raised at is approximately 45,564 Tentative Map and Use the public hearing(s) square feet, and the site is Permit approval, on October described in this notice, or in located in the R- 1- 40,000 25. 2006. This one year written correspondence zoning district. Design extension has expired. The delivered to the Saratoga Review approval is required 24 month extension will Planning Commission at, or pursuant to Saratoga expire on October 27. 2009. prior lo, the public hearing. Municipal Code Section 15- The applicant was granted In order to be included in 45.060. Tentative Map and Use the Planning Commission's APPUCATION907.253 Permit approvals to subdi. information packets, written (393 - 41.032) vide a 29.28 -ape property communications should be Metro PCS. iota Me clustered lots with filed on or before the 20455 Herriman Avenue - an average lot size of 1.73 Tuesday, a week before the The applicant is requesting acres. The remaining 19.49. meeting. Conditional Use Permit acre portion of the property A site visit will be held on approval to locale a wireless is to remain in open space the day preceding the hear - facility at the Presbyterian with a pedestrian, equestri- ing dale listed above as part Church on Heniman at an Irafl winding through the F the standard Site Visit Saratoga Avenue. The pro- open space. Access to the Committee agenda. Site vis• ject consists of a new cross property is to be via a cut. its occur between 3:30 and structure with concealed deaac, which egresses onto 5:00 Jim, The site visit is antennas and a new equip. Mount Eden Road. An emer- open to the public. The Site ment cabinet screened by geacy, access road is pro. Visit Committee will convene existing landscape. The tat posed from Vista Regina at the City Hall parking tat at size is 4.22 acres and the Road to the cut. deaac The 3:30 p.m, on the day pieced. site is zoned R -1- 12,500. propertirhas a General Plan ing the hearing and visit the APPLICATIONR designalion of RHC - Hillside site fated above and may POR07 -0011 Conservation and is roped visit other sites as well For (386.43 -006) HR - Hillside Residential more information please Yongjlan Wang; 19278 District. contact the Community Bellwood Drive: - The appli- (Pub SN 11128) Development Department at cant request Design Review - 408 869 -1222 or review the approval to remove an exis4 Site Visit Agenda on the ing 859 square foot second �f Trustee City Website at wwwsmalo• story -aft an existing two - ga.ca.us. story singie•famil9residence Sales APPLICATION# and replace it with a new Sales PDR07 -003 959 square (001 second (397 -05 -042) slaty addition in approxi- Pilten,1441601dwoodRoad mately the same location. NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE - The applicant requests The residence will not TRUSTEESALE Design Review approval to exceed 26 feet in height. NO. 201-052003 add a second floor to the The net lot site is 14.712 LOAN NO. existing single story resi- square feet. The site is TITLE ORDER NO. 060323 dente. The addition rimed R- 1.12.500. 03391287 includes approximately 298 APPLICATIONN YOU ARE IN DEFAULT square feet to the existing EXT07 -0001 UNDER A DEED OF TRUST "u% now, and. new, approx- (503.13 -067) DATED 4.3.2Do6. UNLESS imately, 1,157 square fool Brunetti /Ho; Mt. Eden Rd. YOU TAKE ACTION TO PRO, seeandd•story to the existing south of Villa Oaks Lane - TECT YOUR PROPERTY, T 4,633 square foot single- The applicant requests a 24 MAY BE SOLD AT A PUBLIC story residence. The total month extension of Tentative SALE. IF YOU NEED AN Important Information: No refunds after submission. Canceled ads will receive credit for Future advertising, not a refund. Ads must be canceled before deadline for that issue. Advertisements are accepted upon the represenmdon that the advertiser and /or its agency have the right to publish the contents thereof. In con. sideration of such publication, advertiser and its agency agree to indemni- fy and hold the publisher harmless against any expense or loss by reason of any daims arising out of publication. The publisher reserves the right to edit, alter, omit, or refuse any advertising submitted. For policies concerning specific categories, please refer to the paragraph at the beginning of the category or call us at 408.200.1025 or email us at classifrals @comnrunity- mwspapers.com. Silicon Valley Community Newspapers accepts no liability for its failure, for any cause, to insert an advertisement. Liability for any error appearing in an adver- tisement is limited to the cost of the space actualty occupied. No allowance, however, will be granted for an error that does not materially affect the value of the advertise- ment. To qualify for an adjustment, any error must be reported within 15 days of publication date. Credit for errors is limited to first insertion. • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, Denise Kaspar , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the 25th day of November 2007, that I deposited 51 notices in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to -wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15- 45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Agsessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property described as: Address: Mt Eden Rd south of Villa Oaks Lane AP N : 503 -13 -067 that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the 0 addresses shown above. J) Denise Kaspar r Advanced Listing Services !3- Nov -07 500' Ownership Listing �ed For: 503 -13 -067 JVAI -YAN & TSAI -PI HO vIT EDEN RD SARATOGA CA 95070 iO3 -10 -029 ?RNESTO E & HAZEL MARINERO )R CURRENT OWNER '.2501 MOUNT EDEN RD iARATOGA CA 95070 -9732 iO3 -13 -021 )AVIS & CHRISTY CHIU )R CURRENT OWNER !1777 MOUNT EDEN RD > ARATOGA CA 95070 -9723 103 -13 -067 VAI -YAN & TSAI -PI HO '2121 LINDY LN ,UPERTINO CA 95014 -4836 -101 ;HIN S & TSUI YAO )R CURRENT OWNER 3947 VISTA REGINA ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -4865 03 -13 -114 iEINRICH E & META HUNZIKER '0 BOX 2807 ! ARATOGA CA 95070 -0807 03 -13 -119 IRADLEY S & S BAKER )R CURRENT OWNER 3991 VISTA REGINA ARATOGA CA 95070 -4865 03- 13- 138,139 OHN E & CHERYL KEENAN )R CURRENT OWNER 2215 MOUNT EDEN RD ARATOGA CA 95070 -9786 503 -10- 044,065,067 VINCE S GARROD 22600 MOUNT EDEN RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -9758 503 -13- 038,039 DAGMAR M HORVATH 15209 BLUE GUM CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -6268 503 -13 -091 VEDAGIRI K & INDU JAYAKUMAR OR CURRENT OWNER 13941 VISTA REGINA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4865 503 -13 -102 ROBERT M & CAROL KARR OR CURRENT OWNER 13951 VISTA REGINA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4865 503 -13 -117. WAI HO 22121 LINDY LN CUPERTINO CA 95014 -4836 503 -13 -123 WILLIAM B TOSCANO OR CURRENT OWNER 13935 VISTA REGINA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4865 503 -13 -143 FRANK J HORVATH OR CURRENT OWNER 22122 MOUNT EDEN RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -9730 503 -13 -019 THOMAS C & ANNE FURLONG OR CURRENT OWNER 13929 VISTA REGINA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4865 503 -13- 141,147 KIM FOSTER 22217 MOUNT EDEN RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -9786 503 -13- 092,127,128 IRANY OR CURRENT OWNER 13937 VISTA REGINA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4865 503 -13 -113 OWEN SINGER OR CURRENT OWNER 13927 PIERCE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -4841 503 -13 -118 ROLSTON JOHNSON OR CURRENT OWNER 13999 VISTA REGINA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4865 503 -13 -124 DAVID R & DAWN KOCSIS OR CURRENT OWNER 13945 VISTA REGINA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4865 503 -13- 144,145 CHAPEL JUDY PO BOX 3458 SARATOGA CA 95070 -1458 O003 503 -69 -022 503 -69- 023,030 GINA ROAD INC ALEXANDER E & JILL FRIES PAPKEN S & CLARA DER TOROSSIAN 8809 COX AV AD OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 8809 CO A V E-20 21950 VIA REGINA 21978 VIA REGINA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4845 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4864 503 -69 -025 503 -69 -026 503 -69 -027 \,lAIROSE R F & W W HANNELORE E THOMAS JOHN W & SHEILA DALY 105-BONAVENTLRA DR PO BOX 2517 OR CURRENT OWNER SAN JOSE CA 95134 SARATOGA CA 95070 -0517 SARATOGA VIA REGINA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4861 503 -69 -028 503 -69 -029 503 -69 -031 3ULDIMANN GARY A & YII -DER HLADIK THOMAS B & CONNIE LAWRENCE 3R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21891 VIA REGINA 21871 VIA REGINA 21823 VIA REGINA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4861 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4861 SARATOGA CA 950704861 503 -69 -032 503 -69 -033 503 -69 -034 ARTHUR F OKUNO CHARLIE C & HELEN CONKLIN MAHBOUBEH & MEHDI MOAZENI DR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER ? 1811 VIA REGINA 21799 VIA REGINA 21781 VIA REGINA 3ARATOGA CA 95070 -4805 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4805 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4805 503 -78 -005 503 -78 -006 503 -69 -035 _ ANDREW J & PAMELA BROWN SURENDRA B MANDAVA 3ETTINA J & WILLIAM BORER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 1622 LATHAM ST 3 21952 VILLA OAKS LN 22010 VILLA OAKS LN MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94041 -1748, SARATOGA CA 95070 -9743 SARATOGA CA 95070 -9743 503 -78 -007 503 -78 -008 503 -78 -009 DWIGHT & DIAN DIERCKS GHAFOURI CHRISTOPHER P & ANGELA CARSTENS DR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER ?2068 VILLA OAKS LN 22126 VILLA OAKS LN 22188 VILLA OAKS LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -9743 SARATOGA CA 95070 -9743 SARATOGA CA 95070 -9743 503 -78 -012 503 -78 -013 503 -78 -014 fEFFREY R & BETH KINGSLEY ROO J KAO JOHN & HEIDI MAGNER DR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 13625 DEER TRAIL CT . 22071 DEER TRAIL CT 13575 DEER TRAIL CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -9782 SARATOGA CA 95070 -9778 SARATOGA CA 95070 503 -78 -026 503 -78 -027 iO3- 78- 024,029 INDERJIT S & PARAMJIT UPPAL ANTHONY COCCIARDI STEVEN D & RHANNA HAYNES OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER !.2111 VILLA OAKS LN ' 22183 VILLA OAKS LN 22631 MOUNT EDEN RD 3ARATOGA CA 95070 -9766 SARATOGA CA 95070 -9766 SARATOGA CA 95070 -9708 iO3 -80 -001 503 -80 -002 503 -80 -003 JDAYA & KAVITHA SHANKAR PAULA &JULIE SCOLA SCHERF )R CURRENT OWNER PO 188 OR CURRENT OWNER BOX !2461 MOUNT EDEN RD PO BOX GA CA 95071 -0188 22200 MOUNT EDEN RD 3ARATOGA CA 95070 -9761 SARATOGA CA 95070 -9757 iO3 -80- 007,008 CITY OF SARATOGA SANK C & YUNGHWA CHANG ATTN: Christopher Riordan Advanced Listing Services )R CURRENT OWNER FRUITVALE AVENUE P.O. Box 2593 13777 '2388 MOUNT EDEN RD SARATOGA FRUI CA E AVENUE Point CA 92624 > ARATOGA CA 95070 -9757 • • • Attachment, 5 • O N FZ m 0 S as a� w �m �w aLU OU aW 0 H 0 Jo 0 Jw U ZZ a o~ oa W U �< >w Z= rW m0 0 Li z az 0 m aW 0w OU oL, �< 0 O Xa a. W F 0� N o VU ]U 01 J oa o In s J Z N 0 �F a NU It wG XW wa LA In 0 Xa WO Z_, F° aw mw D~ of Z� a of WU aZ � Z as U of Q �C S VW U �z W oa �a 0 0 zF_ oa WW �Z 05 Z oW �w U= F Z_ WZ mQ J W aw =a V) V) 0Z Z0 WW WW 0 z0 LL aZ O Za aw aZ J vWi a W Z �w Q W o0 a "~ OFF /III / GARY A & Y11 -DER ; SINGLE FAM1L� / / RESIDENCE APN 503 -59 -02 GREGORY L & MICHELLE L / TILL M & DONNA M GULDJMANN I 5 c / QUESNEL - TRUSTEE JOHN W & SHEILA A DAILY PO• QP i v SINGLE FAMILY p0. S 1 T E\ ,,,, cieA 7 ;' \ SINGLE / SINGLE FAMILY - - - RESIDENCE I ZS w.T \APN 3 7B oo7t - -. -- - RE6113EN- .- - - 7�P1Y5ti5'39 f327� - T ' SAPID & A70USA ., r r GHAFOURI i / APN "503 - 59'-•027 oEN 90. SINGLE FAMILY / \\ — — VICINITY DIAP j • RESIDENCE — — — — — — — — _ APN 603 -78 -008 0. IF CHISTOFIHER CAAS�TENa - - \ '� ,�.✓� / A TRUST SINGLP`,FA/M1LY �IZ;/ - \ / RESIDENCE APN 'S03 -7B -008 Q I HI ADJIt � I is CHARLIE C CONKLIN AGR, ORCHARD THOMAS LAWRENCE 8140 CONNIE R CURRY - SINGLE -FA nL1 .-1 1' ' APN 503 -59 -033 RESIDENCE APN 603- 68 -03i. t DA> R \ \ & DA N H \ _KON Is SINGLE FAMILY AESIDP�jJCE Q APN "6uq -13 124 0; ' 0+ \ / �, —Z e„mwM. PF SUTILiIEp EASE °yr \ •� - .,ys �1_. .eANITMY SEWER ESYT ..,1 // �x� Lett — _ PEH BN )5])PG 315 VINDUM T j'y{1CATION RS FFEfl OF OED A '•""'eJOef� /. +lll _ f J� �,e„� \- i_ - -- —�� �DAYID COANELJUS I 3°PDn aPraTEASEUErrr — _8A*AAK� AR / i ��j� PEN &(1591 PG 5R ''�,� ' .ww. ��e \ I MARY }S MOOAE awN e a Tsui v •.' ° / NI°IV®RCAIm, a, -TR STEE - `ii YAO I " J— i� I / I \ �awoLE FAMILY .I SINGLE FAMILY < °a �"' SINGL�, FAMILY \ RESIDENCE RESIDENCE % \ APN 608-73 101 I - RELk, PAM , I I APN 503 -13 -091 AAMANDOSp �� T✓ 'w \ . i/ 1 _fit -- p.. wME \ tiJA / a i r _ s 1_ APN 5 8 -13 -010 I BD EISEUENr..\ &� BAAA -7- ]J .I n3 \- r-•� PEflau3 o.a te9 \ . HUER I A, ��Q I / a:sit _t�M ft9 S �jE 4 1I� OM•P \PV OE 30` \ I FRED & CHRI \ \,AESIDEN \J / �] t, I J.e>� I I0Y I �CBER7 M \ MANY \ APN 503 -13 1'17\ _ 1 � � - .00 I _ I & I CAROL J I � I � �l JOHNSON TRUST KAAR I I —I ( SINGLE FAMILY 11 \ '�ISIM FOSTER t+ _ I I RES DENCE 9 I.. � \ ..,: � _ � I I � S1NGL13 FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY \ -\I IH LADE `a °m _ I Real FENCE RESIDENCE APN 503 -13 -092 RESIDENTIAL I ....P..• l _ — 1 51- 13-118 I AP 503 -13 -102 � I _ APN — _ \ 1, APN 503- 13 -14i' I � I I \ 44 PAT2E _ t j \ I \ SK 304 p`M JONN \ EENAN -s T — J \ I \ II 7RU87EE -,,�T AL R p — I BK 701 O.M. S. \ I ` SINGLE RESIDENCE ILy .�-_ _ _PAGE \ �PN 503 -13 -139 O �� FRANK J HORVATH / a FRED Z & CHAS! General Notes: \ ' I - - - - dRA-N-Y- ET L - - 1- 1) Preliminary earthwork summary: raw cut 11,4251 c.y.; raw fill 10,8481 c.y. HILLSIDE RESIDENTIALL \ I �� 2 Proposed contours and grades as shown are preliminary. Finish grading is subject to final desi O 1 \ i L / c 1 AGR, PASTURE, GRAZING & RANGE LAND P 9 P ry� 9 9 1 9 2 APN X03 -13 -137 3) Grading shall conform with the recommendations and conditions of the geotechniGal and geological 1 / investigations performed on this site. \1 / \ / APN 503 -13 -128 I Owner /Developer: 4) Topography is based on aerial survey prepared by Cartwright Aerial Surveys, dated 8112/02. The \ \ 1 William Wa Yen Ho contours shown on this plan represent ground elevations as determined at the time of said survey. \ QUA rJ \ /JAri 1\l) J 1 F/I. PAGES 1'2 5) Engineering fill shall be from a mix of expansive (CH) colluviam and granular rock material. r r, / gK 565 O. Archdesign Inc. li DF V AT FI •ect Summary: 18525 Sutter Blvd., suite 155 Geotechnical engineer to provide specification on mix design. / I Morgan Hill, CA 95037 6) An erosion control plan shall be provided with improvement plans. Said erosion control plan shall SINGLE FAMILY / ` voice: 408218 -8785 conform with SWPPP. A notice of intent shall be filed with the state of California. RESIDENCE assessor's"MIrcel number 503 -13 -067 1 fat`: 408865 -tees 7) Contractor shall contact tree arborist prior to construction near or in dripline of trees to remain. total area 29.28 acres / 1,275,437± s.f. Average Slope of Proposed Developed Area 28.25 acre site Construction shall conform to all requirements of said arborist. number of lots 5 0.002291 x L eq g I Architect: 8) All water shall be in conformance with the following: average lot size 1.71± acres / 74,597± s.f. A Integrated Architecture a - Applicable sections of the American Water Works Association. (AW WA) stds., latest edition. total lot area 8.56± acres / 372,985± s.f. S = the average slope in percent ( %) 17705 Hale Avenue b - Standard Specifications and Standard Details, latest edition, City of Saratoga. I = the contour interval in feet = 1 it Morgan Hill, CA 95037 street area 1.23± acres / 53,665± s.f. L - the sum length of contour lines in feet = 268,649 voice: 408 779 -9141 9) All sanitary sewer and storm drainage shall be in conformance with the Standard Specifications open space area 19.49± acres / 848,984± s.f. A = the area in acres = 28.25 I fax: 408 779 -6414 and Standard Details, latest edition, of the City of Saratoga. existing zoning agr L =circa a Ar h't t• 10) Street lighting shall be provided in conformance with the Standard Specifications and Standard Details, latest edition, of the City of Saratoga. 11) All fire hydrants in the designated hazardous fire area shall deliver a minimum 1000 gpm for a sustained period of 2 hours each at 20 psi residual pressure. REVISIONS: DATE: �1 DESCRIPTION BY: Hanna — Brunetti HORIZ. SCALE: Civil Engineen & land Survey°= VERT SCALE:J 7651 Eigleberry Stmet Gilrop, Ca., 95020 DESIGNED BY: (408) 842 -2173 •ClvlI Engineern,•En.dronmentoi Piannlno CHECKED BY: 'IA -ripal Engineerlrm'Sv eying DRAWN BY: _ proposed zoning hillside residential 0.00229 x 1 x 268649 = 21.8 , S= 28.25 21.8% r a E C I eC . Reed Associates Landscape Architecture existing use pasture, grazing I 477 S. Taaffe Street telephone P SBC i Sunnyvale , CA 94086 voice: 408481 -9020 electric & gas Pacific Gas & Electric Company Slope Density Calculation 1 fax: 408481 -9022 sewage City of Saratoga SD= 1 = 2.04 l 0.5- web site: www.raIa.net water City of Saratoga (0.008x0.218) REFERENCES it Tentative Mao -- 4� Civil Engineer: Hanna & Brunetti 7651 Eigleberry Street Gilroy, CA 95020 voice: 408 842 -2173 fax: 408 842 -3662 email: engineering@hannabrunetb.00m Planner: Land Solutions 1174 Uncoln Avenue, Suite 10 San Jose, CA 95125 voice: 408 293 -3765 fax: 408 293 -0820 Geotechnical Enaineer: Pacific Geotechnical Engineering 16055 -D Caputo Drive Morgan Hill, CA 95037 voice: 408 778 -2818 fax: 408 779 -6879 project 1850EG dated: February 5, 2003 C2.1 Lands of Ho - apn 503 113- 067 OF 21 CITY OF SA RA TOGA SANTA CLA RA COUNTY JOB N0. SEPTEMBER 2004 CALIFORNIA 02063 ( D\ 2002\ Sor•a t000\ 02063\02063dwo \dw1102063HO1.dwa 9/7/04 10:14,56 AM PDT 0 4 0 0 I O h n 0 I `o a 9 • • • Item 1 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No. & Location: 06 -118: 20951 Canyon View Drive Type of Application: Design Review & Variance Application #06 -118 Applicant/Owner: Hashemich /Sarnevesh Staff Planner: Heather Bradley, Contract Planner 4 Meeting Date: December 12, 2007 /� Q APN: 503 -28 -008 Department Head: John F. Livingstone, AICP v� Mt CHASt:x9991e3 s iWAY .s, . ]v le d 7. 4 ��.a` y]so i 101 �` r....L�15l1L `1 a.l' • *'e' `� 'r, �'�. Y 28 s 25 ?7.J,r„• ,C /. q' y" K gy � v mar -- -- sic.,, _ „ / �/. ✓ 9r r -- .•��•w-••r.. IL !� /`. ,p3 7 29 Qi 28 3O r ;tea %!' �P F+ `""•.�cs :`•�� 34al �--: 33 "A 32 - -32u -• %,� ��v ! y� `. �' �c'i`` yob ?� \J � "%;.` � • -,... 31 ! ='l S OQ' to a j `c•%� ,1 n rtq r r s ! a v 6,`` `r A r� �y.. -•' Y - -'` •s. t„�t S, y �+ :i \` r�': ,•''' '�� It y ,ta 9 r i ^r 29 •�`G + ;r` 22 to ��a? ' / '�'• r a•. ! ._y'- -•.•. y: e "o ' 6¢. ....'s ?� cq �t:,� `',Va•i: .4'Q +'.'ir: 3/ c ?2 ` v.'.6 tom. S3 .wr. 58 f 4., Ya a� �° 4 �•F,a• TI � 7 h (l .y. °. � r..� an,o tdtt � y '7 Tr° '° `„t, - ..�.-•� ^c' _ r � ,.'a..�' •l• y� tSS /B"r i *�n ` i p^ _ cr'- . ' "•Y}�% ' +`rYf# + ±` ' /y ;^ ?0 8 f X.. $','�'j _ r •+ r' "1 p _' •Y.� .' �3, • ` I� 13 � i v -- trl -. � y... � ..• -,. r} _ .• ' Q ; _i IS , 14 / r IT ,' •r.,,b '> l.��s••• i°� `'- '•�vic `-v�' >'o y`�4z�r ` \�.: y.- N �7 �6 Yi /5 �r i //� eir' 8B 9 3[f °2< c Yf� r'W,rp'• .. �'ca d1.N Tl s. ho 0 FouRTH ve .'`ti -� ' a j.. ��•y }• ;.e 10 o y�; X37 136 ` "�' ,� �/ `p.�r �� 'ma °r•., "! ,•z i,' <_ .. I A i! `�� y0 V1 �y�`. 4 "• �• .� �2 s ,. mac/ ' 135.]9J � /` /�' �. C �• - . � j � - y " " � �. .. ..• • / .. .. 66 �Ojri � ,`q.n' < nil •.TZ' ,`' ;✓ //. 0.70 AC. 74 135 SUBJECT: s �S 13 4 ��e ' - ..•_ %' Canyon View Fourth APN: 503 - 28-008 suns N z , 238 AC. PLAN. +� • • 020 500' Radius 20951 Canyon View Drive Application No. 06 -118; 20951 Canyon View Drive The Planning Commission granted the applicant Variance and. Design Review approval to construct an approximately. 3,635 square foot two -story split level home on this vacant lot at their meeting of October 24, 2007. At that meeting the applicant was also seeking approval to construct a pool on a slope of greater than 30 %, which required further Variance approval. The Planning Commission determined that they did not have adequate information to make a decision on the Variance and continued the application to the meeting of December 12, 2007. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the application for Variance for the pool by adopting the attached Resolution of Denial. 0 PROJECT DATA ZONING: R -1- 40,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential — Very Low Density MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE: Approximately 32,670 gross and net square feet AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: Approximately 39.7% GRADING REQUIRED: 557 cubic yards of cut for the pool only ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed pool is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 (c) New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single - family dwellings. 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY Application filed: 09/22/05 Application complete: 09/24/07 Notice published: 10/10/07 Mailing completed: 10/15/07 Posting completed: 10/18/07 Public Hearing: 10/24/07 Continued to Public Hearing: 12/12/07 The Planning Commission granted the applicant Variance and. Design Review approval to construct an approximately. 3,635 square foot two -story split level home on this vacant lot at their meeting of October 24, 2007. At that meeting the applicant was also seeking approval to construct a pool on a slope of greater than 30 %, which required further Variance approval. The Planning Commission determined that they did not have adequate information to make a decision on the Variance and continued the application to the meeting of December 12, 2007. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the application for Variance for the pool by adopting the attached Resolution of Denial. 0 PROJECT DATA ZONING: R -1- 40,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential — Very Low Density MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE: Approximately 32,670 gross and net square feet AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: Approximately 39.7% GRADING REQUIRED: 557 cubic yards of cut for the pool only ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed pool is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 (c) New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single - family dwellings. 11 Application No. 06 -118; 20951 Canyon View Drive 0 PROJECT DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting Variance approval to construct pool and spa on the right side of the approved house. The pool would meet setback requirements and would require 557 cubic yards of grading. However, due to the steep average slope of the lot the footprint of the pool and spa area would be built on a slope of 39.7 %. Pursuant to Saratoga City Code section 15- 12.061, no structure shall be located on a slope exceeding 30% except where the findings can be made to support a Variance approval. History This application was heard at the Planning Commission Public Hearing of October 24th, 2007. At that time the Commission approved the Design Review application for the residence with a Variance approval to allow the residence to be built on a slope of greater than 30 %. However, the Planning Commission determined that they did not have adequate information to make a decision on the Variance application for the proposed pool, and continued the application to the meeting of December 12, 2007. Correspondence and Neighbor Review Staff has received no further correspondence from neighbors regarding the pool application. The applicant has submitted four Multiple Listing Service printouts on homes in the neighborhood at 21.281 Canyon View, 21081 Canyon View, 21215 Sullivan Way and, 21079 Michaels Drive which have pools on sloping parcels. However the slope has not been confirmed on any of these properties. Staff attempted to search through City records for information on these pools and could not find any prior approvals for Variance applications for pools on these properties. The reasons may be many and varied, but staff suspects that in some cases the average slope may be less than 30 %, the slope may have been leveled to create a yard area prior to the pool proposal, or the pool was constructed prior to City Code requirements for pool location on slopes over 30 %. Please refer to Attachment 3 for photos of existing pools in the Multiple Listing printouts. GeotechnicaUGrading This application has undergone a substantial geotechnical peer review given the characteristics of the site. On May 4th, 2006 the City Geotechnical Engineer granted a geotechnical clearance, including pool approval. At that time the pool was proposed behind the house rather than the side of the house. The applicant's geotechnical consultant has determined that the new location for the pool would meet all specifications of the City Geologist. However, if this application is approved a condition of approval would need to be included in the Resolution requiring additional peer review of the new pool location by the City Geologist. Arborist Review /Trees An Arborist report was prepared on October 5, 2005 by David Babby, consulting Arborist. Since that time the building footprint and rear yard grading have changed slightly and the City Arborist 3 Application No. 06 -118; 20951 Canyon View Drive has reviewed the revised plans and provided updated comments which have also been included in the attachment. There are two trees that could be potentially impacted by the construction of the proposed pool. They are two Monterey Pine trees located ' on the neighboring vacant lot to the right of this property. Their combined value is $730 and the City Arborist has provided recommendations for tree protection, which would need to be incorporated into the Resolution if approved. Landscaping A landscape plan has been submitted which shows 24" box oaks located on the sides of the house for screening as well as 24" box olive and Japanese maples along the rear of the house, 24" box Eastern redbuds and crepe myrtles are proposed at the front of the house adjacent to the street. Additional shrubs, and groundcovers are proposed around the pool. VARIANCE Pursuant to City Code 15- 19.020 (d), the average slope beneath a structure, including pools, shall not exceed 30- percent slope. The property has a continuous average slope of 39.7 - percent which holds true at the building and pool footprint as well. However, staff has determined that the findings necessary to support the variance for the proposed pool cannot be made, and has found no other instances where variances have been granted for pools on steep slopes. VARIANCE FINDINGS The proposed pool is not supported by two to the three findings for Variance approval subject to City Code 15- 70.060: (a) That because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, strict enforcement of the specified regulations would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity and classified in the same zoning district. It is not a deprivation to deny the variance application for a pool on this lot as this is a neighborhood of steeply sloped lots and pools are only constructed on those properties with areas of level ground where a variance is not required for their approval. Therefore, this finding cannot be made in the affirmative. (b) That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the imitations on other properties in the vicinity and classified in the same zoning district. Granting of this Variance would be a special privilege in that there are very few pools in this neighborhood and those would have been built on properties with a level area so that a variance approval would not be required. Therefore, .this finding cannot be made in the affirmative. (c) That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The granting of this Variance would not be detrimental to the public health, safely or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The pool would be 4 Application No. 06 -118; 20951 Canyon View Drive required to meet the current California Building Code Standards and Geotechnical Clearance conditions would be met. Therefore, this finding can be made in the affirmative. CONCLUSION Staff recommends the Planning Commission deny the Variance application for the pool by adopting the attached Resolution. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution of Denial — Variance for the pool 2. Letter from applicant's builder 3. Multiple Listing Service printouts 4. Landscape plan, Exhibit "A" • • 5 ATTACHMENT 1 • • • Application No. 06 -118; 20951 Canyon View Drive 0 RESOLUTION NO. _ Application No. 06 -118. CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Sarnevesht/Hashemieh; 20951 Canyon View Drive DENIAL OF VARIANCE FOR POOL ON GREATER THAN 30% SLOPE WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received a Variance application to allow a proposed pool to be constructed with a greater than 30% slope at the pool footprint; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, the project, which proposes construction of a new single - family residence is Categorically exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303(c) New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. This exemption allows for construction of a single family home in an urban area; and WHEREAS, the applicant has not met the burden of proof required to support said application for Variance approval for the proposed pool, and the following findings have not been determined: (d) That because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, strict enforcement of the specified regulations would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity and classified in the same zoning district. It is not a deprivation to deny the variance application for a pool on this lot as this is a neighborhood of steeply sloped lots and pools are only constructed on those properties with areas of level ground where a variance is not required for their approval. Therefore, this finding cannot be made in the affirmative. (e) That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the imitations on other properties in the vicinity and classified in the same zoning district. Granting of this Variance would be a special privilege in that there are very few pools in this neighborhood and those would have been built on properties with a level area so that a variance approval would not be required. Therefore, this finding cannot be made in the affirmative. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the application of Sarnevesht/Hashemieh for Variance approval has been denied. 0 Application No. 06 -118; 20951 Canyon View Drive Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15 -90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 12th day of December 2007 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Joyce Hlava, Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: John F. Livingstone, AICP, Secretary, Planning Commission 7 • � ATTACHMENT 2.. • From: Building Designers Alex G. Du Von 125 E. Sunnyoaks Avenue, Suite 104 Campbell, CA 95008 (408) 378 -3832 To: Saratoga Planning Commission Regarding: 20951 Canyon View Dr I am writing to inform the commission that I would like to build this pool within the plan I have, I was told that it was not possible. I visited some houses within the same area as the mentioned property; they had a high slope, same slope as the plan and had swimming pools in their yards. After carefully examining the geology report it has become evident that the proposed pool for this kind of slope with the proposed retaining wall does not create any hazard or instability. Attached to my letter will be some existing houses with the same qualities as the proposed plan that have a swimming pool within their yard. Thank you for your assistance with this issue Building Designers Alex G. Du Von L • • � ATTACHMENT 3 • Reports Home I Search > Search > Results > Details jAgent Page ICI Page 1 of 2 Training I Reference Library I Feedback I Contact Us My Listings My Clients Resources Statistics My Info Listing 1 of 14 >> Print HTML M Download PDF W View All Photos 21215 SULLIVAN WY, Saratoga 95070 (Saratoga) $3,200,000 Beds: 3 bed(s) Baths: 3 bath(s) DOM: 62 CDOM: 62 MILS r� g` ; Property Overview A,`, Miehaels Or 21215 SULLIVAN WY M4thaefs Dr Suttivan Way CA eu !gnyon.Vtt,,.Cr +0 04:1 tni �«►� 10 20D6 `Tele AiLUs Rel. 0712001 Saratoga (Saratoga) 95070 Saratoga (Area 17) Santa Clara County Detached Single Family (Cla: Bed /Bath: 3/3 „I SgFt: 2700 (Agent) Lot Size: 40,828 sq ft Q Age: 45 years 1 Assoc Fee: Parcel #: 503 -28 -094 Commission: 3.00% Remarks Floor Covering(S) Finest appliances, granite, travertine, radiant heat, etc. Plenty room to expand. Pool house, vast lawns & decks ensure great entertaining. Extraordinary one of a kind location, conveniently a short walk to the Village, yet with exceptional privacy, protection of a private road, seren mature oaks, redwoods and ferns and a timeless view of the valley lights. Pantry Private Attic Dates Pricing Schools /Districts List: 09/29/2007 List: $3,200,000 Elem: --/ Saratoga Union Elemen Original: 09/29/2007 Original: $3,688,800 Middle:- - Sale: Sale: -- High: --/ Los Gatos - Saratoga Joii COE: High Expires: 10/29/2008 OffMarket: 11/30/2007 Tour Information Tour 1: Assoc 1: Tour 2: Assoc 2: Original: Remarks: Property Features Familyroom Separate Family Room Informal Dining Area Eat in Kitchen Other Rooms Utility Room Bedroom Descriptions Showing Information -- Occupant: -- -- Occupied By:Owner -- Phone: (408) 621 -0034 -- Owner: TONI PAUL -- Add'I Owner: -- -- Instructions: Call First -Then Keysafe, Supra Keysafe Other Areas Floor Covering(S) Formal Entry Area Carpeting Laundry Area - Inside Hardwood Pantry Tile Attic Wall to Wall Carpeting Fireplace Location Amenities Fireplace in Living Room 220 Volts in Kitchen Cooling 220 Volts in Laundry Map X- street: Canyon View Barclay: Pg:74 Hz: 21 Thomas Pg:872 Grid:'C2 Lot Description Cul -de -Sac Lot Has Pool Pool View Bay View View of City Lights Valley View Garage /Parking 2 Car Garage Attached Yards /Grounds Automatic Sprinl Horse(s) Permit Patio or Deck Ci Possible Tennis https: // pro. mislistings. com /Reports/Main.aspx ?propertyId= 779837 12/3/2007 Reports Page 2 of 2 Shower And Tub Central Air Conditioning Area Canyon View Site 1 Shower over Tub Heating Ceiling Fan(s) Sprinklers - Fror Shower Central Forced Air Heat Double Pane Windows Sprinklers - Rea 2 or More Stall Showers Gas Heat Gas Hookup in Laundry More than One Heating Area Zone Gas Water Heater Radiant Heat Satellite Dish Listing Agent/Office Information Paul Liccardo (DRE #01146809) Pref Phone: 408 - 867 -9650, Email: optionrealty @msn.com Option Realty Corporation Pref Fax: - -, Off Ph: 408 - 867 -9650, , Off Fx: 408 - 867 -9669 About MLSListings I Privacy Policy I Terms of Service © 2006 -2007 MLSListings Inc. All rights reserved. 373571290.76 (3.5.4.4 Build 216) https: / /pro.mislistings. corn/Reports/N4ain.aspx ?propertyId= 779837 12/3/2007 All Images . Print Page I of 2 https: / /pro.mislistings.com/ reports /A11Images.aspx ?property _ id= 779837 12/3/2007 All Images Page 2 of 2 https://pro.mlslist.ings.com/reports/Alllmages.aspx?property id=77983 7 12/3/2007 � ATTACHMENT 4 • 6/630 6 30 20--- ,I ,%wol (E) Railed curb x Site ieadning —0. typ. (E) Utility Pd. — 620 610 high fence. typ. 5 P85D Timber retaining mfl PRELIMINARY LEGEND TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE II IARGES rFNIBLEa ouercm agntwits Coast L— Oak 24• b. ouarctis dougiasi Blue Oak 24" b. Amr rubmM I Red Maple 24� b. fl =VR 111� Mahone Hybrld 24" box 11111biere, Box 24"— Sequole _nnlere C.* Redwood 24' box mmum ACCENT TREES Camis canadenals, I "stem Redbud 24* b. Lg.."amils W. Crepe Myrtle 24* box Magnolia stellate St. M.9n.11a 24" b. MEDIUM SCREEN TREES CeenoMus'Julio Phelps'', VAd Uac 15 gal MY6. califorrica I Pacrk Wex Myrtle 15 gal ..11aremales v avisGd1r, T_ 15 gal SMALL AC NT 11R1 • Acer pannatum J.P­ Maple ZC box Tdistisni. laud. Water G— 24" b. ()I*a mopa Hill 010- 24r bor Il W V7 r g a) Co CL Mo V O .S; E (a J -0 - U., 3: W A SHEET NO. • 49 L-2 4 W rn Z se— owl E PON!` -ZAP • ,I ,%wol (E) Railed curb x Site ieadning —0. typ. (E) Utility Pd. — 620 610 high fence. typ. 5 P85D Timber retaining mfl PRELIMINARY LEGEND TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE II IARGES rFNIBLEa ouercm agntwits Coast L— Oak 24• b. ouarctis dougiasi Blue Oak 24" b. Amr rubmM I Red Maple 24� b. fl =VR 111� Mahone Hybrld 24" box 11111biere, Box 24"— Sequole _nnlere C.* Redwood 24' box mmum ACCENT TREES Camis canadenals, I "stem Redbud 24* b. Lg.."amils W. Crepe Myrtle 24* box Magnolia stellate St. M.9n.11a 24" b. MEDIUM SCREEN TREES CeenoMus'Julio Phelps'', VAd Uac 15 gal MY6. califorrica I Pacrk Wex Myrtle 15 gal ..11aremales v avisGd1r, T_ 15 gal SMALL AC NT 11R1 • Acer pannatum J.P­ Maple ZC box Tdistisni. laud. Water G— 24" b. ()I*a mopa Hill 010- 24r bor Il W V7 Z 0 ro r g a) Co CL Mo V O .S; E (a J -0 - U., 3: W SHEET NO. • 49 L-2 4 W rn Z se— owl E Z 0 ro C: all r g a) Co CL Mo V O .S; E (a J -0 - U., 3: W SHEET NO. L-2 W rn Z E C: all ?I d) Co CL Mo .S; E (a J -0 - U., 3: W SHEET NO. L-2 � REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • • Item 2 Application No./Location: CUP 07- 0003/18681 Vessing Court Type of Application: Conditional Use Permit for the installation of an Emergency Generator for a Single Family Home Applicant/Owner: Curt Cline (Applicant) / Tom & Heather Boger (Owner) Staff Planner: Christopher A. Riordan, AICP, Senior Planner 4 Date: December 12, 2007 APN: 397 -05 -086 Department Head: John Livingstone, AICP, Director CT. i r•1 M ;fir i 1.57AC. 7 9 Y Y, 1016k 2 3 j 4 nl zos _ 79 11.23/ U,.•6 ,Sb'bsl• IM \ M>N tuaff>ef er .._ -. t 1 x ~ f +n f - PC.L.4 I'pTN PC � PCLI . x PCL s rmc •90� A) '- 31 PCL.B 67 '� r•ffwY Soo , ,: t Ac a arnc ` J ti v �aiC> -1 4. 4 � ,d'• •�/ "� —� � - � � p ' �> Iii, '.. 1� W ro '� ••. �S i' f •,U i O 1 x !o• $ v z �y i i n � 417.77 S 1 — •3F -rc"L• "'i::��ii O'O _ �, a : t A S ubj ect: r ` lop, _ ; 18681 Vessinj Court €' R APNs:397 -05 -086 W Na> i` ; � S 500' Radius xto �I, 18681 VESSING COURT Application No. CUP. 07- 0003118681 Vessing Court BACKGROUND: This application was continued from the meeting of November 14, 2007. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:. The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit for the installation of a generator to provide emergency backup power supply for a single - family residence. The generator is to be installed south of the residence, adjacent to the garage, the driveway. and the pool equipment building. The generator will be located on a concrete foundation and surrounded by a concrete retaining wall and wood enclosure that hides the generator as well as provides additional noise reduction. The lot size is 54,284 gross square feet and is zoned R -1- 40,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the Conditional Use Permit Application to install an emergency power generator with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. • 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY: Application filed: 10/02/07 Application complete: 11/21/07 Notice published: 11/28/07 Mailing completed: 10/19/07 Posting completed: 12/06/07 BACKGROUND: This application was continued from the meeting of November 14, 2007. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:. The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit for the installation of a generator to provide emergency backup power supply for a single - family residence. The generator is to be installed south of the residence, adjacent to the garage, the driveway. and the pool equipment building. The generator will be located on a concrete foundation and surrounded by a concrete retaining wall and wood enclosure that hides the generator as well as provides additional noise reduction. The lot size is 54,284 gross square feet and is zoned R -1- 40,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the Conditional Use Permit Application to install an emergency power generator with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. • 2 Application No. CUP 07- 0003118681 Vessing Court 0 STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R -1- 40,000 (Single - Family Residential) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: RVLD (Very Low Density Single - Family) PARCEL SizE: 54,284 square feet PR(I.TFC:T DATA: Regulation Proposal Code Requirements Setback • 41 feet from the south Generator must be located outside of all (front) property line setback areas. • 46 feet from the east Front / 30 feet (side) property line Side / 20 feet • 44 feet from the west Rear / 50 feet (side) property line • 265 feet from the north (rear) property line Noise Level Maximum 60 dBA at the Daytime (7:00 AM - 7:00 PM) - 60 dBA property lines Evening (7:00 PM —10:00 PM) -50 dBA Ni time 10:00 PM — 7:00 AM - 45 dBA ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed project is categorically exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15303 of the Guidelines for the Implementation of CEQA. This Class 3 exemption applies to new construction of limited small new facilities; installation of small, new equipment and facilities in small structures. PROJECT DISCUSSION AND SITE CHARACTERISRTICS This application for a Conditional Use Permit is for the installation of a natural gas powered generator that would provide emergency backup power for a single - family residence. The generator and its enclosure will be located to the south of the existing house and adjacent to the existing pool equipment enclosure. A 6' -11" foot tall concrete and wooden enclosure would be constructed around the generator for the aesthetic benefit of shielding the appearance of the generator as viewed from both on and off site as well as reducing the noise emitted by the generator during operation. The- wood used for the exterior of the enclosure will match the siding of the residence as well as that of the adjacent pool enclosure. The enclosure will be covered with a galvanized steel grate that will provide both security as well as ventilation for the generator. For safety purposes, a three foot tall fence will be attached to the top edges of the enclosure. The fence will be composed of stainless steel supports and cables with a mahogany wood cap rail. The fence will match the one that is installed on top of the adjacent pool enclosure as well as those on the decks of the residence. The generator will be operated during the daytime for testing purposes no more than once per month. No evening or nighttime generator use would occur under non - emergency 3 Application No. CUP 07- 0003/18681 Vessing Court circumstances. This testing will not exceed six (6) hours per year at a rate of 15 -30 minutes per month. Section 7 -30 of the Saratoga Municipal Code (SMC) (Noise Ordinance) limits the residential daytime maximum decibel level (dBA) for all outdoor uses to 60 dBA. Daytime is defined as the 12 hour period between 7:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M: Based on the Noise Assessment Study (Attachment 2) submitted by the applicant, the noise produced by the generator while inside its wooden and concrete enclosure would not exceed 60 dBA, as measured along the south, northwest, and northeast property line, and. would not exceed the maximum 60dBA daytime noise limit. The intended purpose of emergency generators is to provide temporary emergency power during those periods of electrical .power disruption which can occur both during the day and at night. Per SMC Section 7- 30.030(a), the noise emitted from emergency power generators may exceed the noise limits listed in the Noise Ordinance (the evening and night limits) when they are operated during emergencies to provide power that will preserve, protect, or save lives or property from imminent danger, loss, or harm. Neighbor Correspondence The applicant has shown the project plans to neighbors as indicated in the attached Neighbor Notification Forms (Attachment 4). No negative comments have been received at the time of the writing of this Staff Report. Use Permit Findings The proposed project is consistent with the following findings stated in SMC Section 15- 55.070 necessary to grant Use Permit approval to install and operate an emergency power generator. (a) That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the district. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that staff finds that the proposed emergency power generator to be a conditionally permitted use in the R -1- 40,000 zone residential district, the generator is located well outside all minimum setbacks, and the noise emitted by the generator during its operation would not exceed the noise thresholds for daytime use as specified in the Noise Ordinance. (b) That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the - public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity: This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the generator will meet requirements .of the City's Noise Ordinance, and will be surrounded by a 6' -11" tall concrete and wooden enclosure that will provide both visual screening and additional noise attenuation. Furthermore, the generator will only be utilized for emergency purposes . when there is an 2 Application No. CUP 07- 0003118681 Vessing Court electrical power outage. The generator is also conditioned to meet all requirements of the building department. (c) That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this chapter: This finding may be made in the affirmative in that staff finds that the proposed emergency generator is a conditionally approved use within R -1- 40,000 residential zone district and it has been determined that the project is in compliance with all applicable development standards of Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15 -80 (Miscellaneous Regulations and Exceptions). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that the Use Permit Findings can be made in the affirmative and that the proposed emergency generator would not exceed the noise thresholds for daytime use as listed in the Noise Ordinance and would conform to all of the standards and requirements of Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15 -80. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the application for a Conditional Use Permit with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit. 2. Noise Assessment Study prepared by Environmental Consulting Services, dated November 1, 2007. 3. Emergency generator manufacturer specifications submitted by the applicant. 4. Neighbor review letters. 5. Affidavit of mailing notices, public hearing notice, and copy of mailing labels for project notification. 6. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A." 5 Attachment 1 • • • RESOLUTION NO. Application Number: CUP 07 -0003 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Tom and Heather Boger 18681 Vessing Court APN 397 -05 -086 WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for a Conditional Use Permit to install an emergency power generator in association with a single - family residence in the R -1- 40,000 zone district. The net lot size is approximately 54,284 square feet; and WHEREAS, Zoning Code Section 15- 80.030(k) states that any emergency power generator located outside.a required setback area may be permitted upon the granting of a conditional use permit from the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, The proposed project to install an emergency power generator is categorically exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15303 of the Guidelines for the Implementation of CEQA. This Class 3 exemption applies to new construction of limited small new facilities; installation of small, new equipment and facilities in small structures; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Conditional Use Permit approval pursuant and the following findings specified in SMC Section 15- 55.070 have been made in the affirmative: (a) That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the district. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that staff finds that the proposed emergency power generator to be a conditionally permitted use in the R -1- 40,000 zone residential zone district, the generator is located well outside all minimum setbacks, and the noise emitted by the generator during its operation would not exceed the noise thresholds for daytime use as specified in the Noise Ordinance. (b) That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity: This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the generator will meet requirements of the City's Noise Ordinance, and will be surrounded by a C -11" tall concrete and wooden enclosure that will provide both visual screening and additional noise attenuation. Furthermore, the Application No. CUP07- 0003118681 Vessing Court generator will only be utilized for emergency purposes when there is an electrical power outage. The generator is also conditioned to meet all requirements of the building department. (c) That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this chapter: This finding may be made. in the affirmative in that staff finds that the proposed emergency generator is a conditionally approved use within R -1- 40,000 residential zone district and it has been determined that the project is in compliance with all applicable development standards of Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15 -80 (Miscellaneous Regulations and Exceptions). Now, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the application for Conditional Use Permit approval are hereby granted subject to the following conditions: PERMANENT CONDITONS OF APPROVAL — 1. The generator is shall only be used for providing emergency power during power outages. The operation of the emergency generator shall at all times be subject to Saratoga Municipal Code Section 7 -30 (Noise Ordinance). Monthly testing of the generator to ensure it is in working order shall not exceed six (6) hours per year at a rate of 15 -30 minutes per month and shall only occur during the daytime hours from 7:00 A.M. - 7:00 P.M. STANDARD DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL CONDITIONS — COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2. The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A" date stamped November 26, 2007, incorporated by reference. All changes to the approved plans must be submitted in writing with plans showing the changes and are subject to the Community Development Director's approval. .3. The following shall be required and/or included as to the plans submitted to the Building Division for the building plan check review process: a. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans incorporating this Resolution as a separate plan page. ACCOUSTIC ENGINEER 4. All recommendations contained in the Noise Study prepared by Environmental Consulting Services dated November 15, 2007, shall be followed. Prior to building permit final, the acoustic engineers shall submit a letter to the Community Development Director certifying that the noise emitted from the emergency power generator conforms to the noise ordinance. Application No. CUP07- 0003118681 Vessing Court • CITY ATTORNEY 5. Owner and Applicant agree to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. Section 2. A Building Permit must be issued and construction commenced within 36 months from the date of adoption of this Resolution or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15 -90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 12th day of December 2007 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT:. ABSTAIN: Joyce Hlava Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: John F. Livingstone, AICP Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date Attachment 2 • • • Environmental Consulting Services 18488 Prospect Road — Suite 1, Saratoga, CA 95070 Phone: (408) 257 -1045 stanshe1199 @toast.net . FAX: (408) 257 -7235 November 15, 2007 Mr. Tom Boger 18681 Vessing Court Saratoga, CA Re: Noise Study of Proposed Cummins 100 kW GGHH Gas Generator Installation next to residence at 18681 Vessing Court, Saratoga Dear Mr. Boger, In response to your request for a noise study for the subject project, I have evaluated the installation plans, the site, and operating noise level data for the generator. The potential noise impacts of this installation, and compliance with City of Saratoga noise requirements, are described in this letter. Existing Noise Environment Ambient field noise measurements on site were made during the morning of October 25, 2007, with a CEL -440 Precision Noise Meter and analyzer, calibrated with a B & K Model 4230 Sound Level Calibrator. The measurement location was chosen to represent the on -site ambient noise level near the proposed generator location. Noise levels were measured and are reported using percentile noise descriptors: Lgo (the background noise level exceeded 90 % of the time), L50 (the median noise level exceeded 50% of the time), L10 (the peak noise level exceeded 10% of the time), and Leq (the energy - equivalent average noise level). Measured noise levels are presented in Exhibit 1 below. The long term Ldn /CNEL noise levels would be very near the measured Leq in this location. The levels are shown in the table below. Ambient Noise Levels —18681 Vessing Ct. (dBA) Location L90 L50 L10 Leq Generator location 42 44 50 48 The measured ambient noise levels are consistent with a quiet location that has no nearby . steady traffic such as exists at the Vessing Court site, with distant traffic and neighborhood environmental sounds setting the ambient. City of Saratoga Noise Standards Noise levels produced by sources in the City of Saratoga are limited by section 7- 30.040 of the Municipal Code, "Ambient Noise Standards ", which allows a maximum daytime noise level of 60 dBA at the property line of any adjacent residential property during daytime, 50 dBA during evening hours, and 45 dBA at night. The generator in this project would not be operated other than for a power emergency; except for required daytime testing. Also, generator operation and other activities and equipment used temporarily in responding to an emergency are exempted from City noise ordinance limitations by Municipal Code section 7- 30.030 (a), "Exemptions ". • 18681 Vessing Court Residential Generator Noise Study, Saratoga Page 2 of 3 Generator Installation and Projected Operational Noise Levels The generator to be installed is a Cummins 100 KW GGHH Generator, powered by piped natural • gas, and fitted with a F173 and F217 Quiet Site II Second Stage sound enclosure and muffler, the best acoustic enclosure and muffler set available from the manufacturer, which reduce the unmitigated generator set operational noise by about 15 dBA. The generator is to be installed south of the residence, adjacent to the garage, the driveway and the pool equipment building, with a concrete foundation and retaining wall, and an open -top natural wood enclosure that hides the acoustic enclosure of the generator as well as providing additional noise reduction. Except when there is a power outage emergency, the generator would only be run for test purposes, at most once per month during the daytime, for 15 to 30 minutes. No evening or nighttime 'generator use would occur under non- emergency circumstances. There are four residential properties adjacent to the project site that could potentially be impacted by generator. noise. The nearby property lines and residences are oriented approximately as follows relative to the proposed generator installation: To the southwest — 70 feet to the property line (residence another 75 feet away) To the southeast — 75 feet to the property line (residence another 85 feet away) To the northwest —.70 feet to the property line (residence another 100 feet away) To the northeast — 60 feet to the property line (residence another 70 feet away) None of the adjacent properties is at the same elevation as the generator; all but the one to the southeast are below the generator elevation, which is elevated. Noise Analysis and Mitigation If the generator with its acoustic enclosure was installed in an open flat area, it would generate an operational noise level of 69 -70 dBA at 23 feet at full load, according to manufacturer's test data. This study involves insuring that the generator noise level is 60 dBA or less at each of the adjacent property lines. The distance to each of the property lines provides 6 -7 dB of the needed reduction relative to the noise level at 23 feet. The properties to the southeast and southwest are partially protected by a hill along the south border of the site, while the properties to the northwest and northeast are at a lower elevation. To provide the needed extra noise mitigation for the adjacent properties, the outer architectural enclosure that is not masonry should have a significant density /thickness to provide additional noise reduction. However, care must be taken not to restrict the large amount of required intake airflow to the generator, both for combustion and for cooling. For this reason the enclosure and the space around the inner enclosure must be sufficient (2 to 3 feet) to allow for proper airflow on three sides of the generator. Extra airflow during short test periods can be accommodated through a space under the front doors, while the doors should be opened for any long emergency periods requiring the generators to run. . The recommended noise mitigation measures involve modifications to the outer architectural generator enclosure as follows: 1. Modify the doors to allow at least a 4 inch space between the bottom of the front doors and the ground to allow for air flow into the enclosure with the doors closed. 2. Front doors and the sides of the enclosure that are not masonry should be of at least' / +" marine plywood, or material of similar weight and thickness. 3. Install the'following two layers of material on all wood and concrete surfaces inside the architectural enclosure: a. on all interior wall and door surfaces —1 " thick layer of Sound Silencer acoustic panels b. on top of acoustic panels (a) — 2" thick weather - resistant Silicon Quilted Curtain panels (fiberglass filler only, no transmission loss layer). The vendor for these materials is: Acoustical Surfaces, Inc, Chaska, MN. Phone: 1- 800 - 526 -3138. Website: www.acousticalsurfaces.com Environmental Consulting Services Saratoga 18681 Vessing Court Residential Generator Noise Study, Saratoga Page 3 of 3 • Compliance with City of Saratoga Noise Standards • With the proposed generator fitted with the best manufacturer's sound attenuation enclosure and mufflers, as well as the recommended additional noise mitigation measures to the architectural enclosure, the generator noise level would be expected to comply with the City daytime limit of 60 dBA at the adjacent residential property lines. Noise levels at the adjacent residences would be in the 50 to 55 dBA range. If I can be of further assistance on this project, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully submitted, ME 1=1 I H. Stanton Shelly Acoustical Consultant Board Certified Member (1982) Institute of Noise Control Engineering CC: Mr. Curt Cline, Architect, modern design collaborative, San Mateo References Site and Generator Installation Drawings, Curt Cline, Architect, modem design collaborative, 15 North Ellsworth, San Mateo, CA; Nov 8, 2007. Generator specification set, Gas Model 100GGHH, Cummins Power Generation, Minneapolis, Minnesota; June 2006. Drawing 0500_4087, Quiet Site II Sound Housing (model F173) with muffler (model F217), Cummins Power Generation; July 2004. Bulletin MSP —185b, Generator Sound Data, Cummins Power Generation. Environmental Consulting Services Saratoga • Residential Level Exhaust Silencers "F" Mounting Flange: Typical Attenuation Curve dB(A)r �.. Standard in sizes 4" to 22 ". Drilling (ACTUAL ATTENUATION MAY VARY ACCORDING TO APPLICATION) matches 125/150# ASA standard. 40 Q 35 c 30 25 c Q 20 cu Q15 ~� 10 31.5 63 125 250 500 1K 2K 4K 8K Octave Band Center Frequency (Hz) . *Estimated Application: These silencers are recommended where minimum silencing is required and ambient noise levels are medium to high. Construction: Aluminized Steel: Silencers through 26" O.D. are fabricated of aluminized steel as standard materials. This material has a maximum operating temperature of 1250 °F. Mild Steel /Aluminized Steel: Silencers 30" O.D. and larger are fabricated of mild steel and aluminized steel. All silencers 30" O.D: through 36" O.D. have aluminized steel bodies with all other components fabricated from mild steel. Silencers 42" O.D. and larger are fabricated from mild steel. Silicone Aluminum Paint: Silencers through 26" O.D. are given a coat of high heat resistant silicone aluminum paint. "P" Male Pipe Threads: NPT ends offered in sizes 3/4" through 4 ". Companion flanges available for 4" to 22 ". Pressure Drop 24 22 220 918 18 N16 X14 -12 a 210 0 (D 8 �6 a` 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Exhaust Gas Velocity in.Thousands (Ft/Min) Note: When figuring pressure drop for side inlet or middle side inlet add 3" H2O to back pressure shown on above curve. Primer /Silicone Aluminum Paint: Silencers over 30" O.D. and larger are given a coat of high heat, *Estimated rust inhibiting primer and then a topcoat of high heat resistant silicone aluminum paint. Physical properties are maintained up to 900 °F* on aluminized steel and 1100 °F* on mild steel. Sample Specification: The silencer is to be a Residential Level Silencer constructed of aluminized steel (26" body diameter ■ 31.5 63 125 250 500 1K 2K 4K 8K Octave Band Center Frequency (Hz) . *Estimated Application: These silencers are recommended where minimum silencing is required and ambient noise levels are medium to high. Construction: Aluminized Steel: Silencers through 26" O.D. are fabricated of aluminized steel as standard materials. This material has a maximum operating temperature of 1250 °F. Mild Steel /Aluminized Steel: Silencers 30" O.D. and larger are fabricated of mild steel and aluminized steel. All silencers 30" O.D: through 36" O.D. have aluminized steel bodies with all other components fabricated from mild steel. Silencers 42" O.D. and larger are fabricated from mild steel. Silicone Aluminum Paint: Silencers through 26" O.D. are given a coat of high heat resistant silicone aluminum paint. "P" Male Pipe Threads: NPT ends offered in sizes 3/4" through 4 ". Companion flanges available for 4" to 22 ". Pressure Drop 24 22 220 918 18 N16 X14 -12 a 210 0 (D 8 �6 a` 4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Exhaust Gas Velocity in.Thousands (Ft/Min) Note: When figuring pressure drop for side inlet or middle side inlet add 3" H2O to back pressure shown on above curve. Primer /Silicone Aluminum Paint: Silencers over 30" O.D. and larger are given a coat of high heat, *Estimated rust inhibiting primer and then a topcoat of high heat resistant silicone aluminum paint. Physical properties are maintained up to 900 °F* on aluminized steel and 1100 °F* on mild steel. Sample Specification: The silencer is to be a Residential Level Silencer constructed of aluminized steel (26" body diameter Model: GS100 Ratings Range: 50Hz 60Hz Standby: kw 74-80 82-100 kW /kVA Amps kW /kVA kva 93-100 103-125 277/480 Prime: kw .62-72 71- 91 100/125 150 90/113 136 kva 78-90 89-114 60 100 125 300 DRAWING DEPICTS UNIT WITH OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT Features • Single source responsibility for the generator set and accesories. • Prototype and production tested to insure one step load acceptance per NFPA 110. • Two year limited warranty.on generator sets and accessories. • Unit conforms to CSA, NEMA, EGSA, ANSI and other standards. • Microprocessor based control system providing digital metering and monitoring. e Heavy duty 4 cycle industrial engine for reliability and fuel efficiency. • Brushless rotating field generator with class H insulation. • Heavy duty steel base.with integral vibration isolators. Generator Voltage. PH Hz LP / NAT. GAS 125'C Rise Standby Rating LP / NAT. GAS 105'C Rise Prime Rating kW /kVA Amps kW /kVA M =..h UC1274C311 277/480 3 60 100/125 150 90/113 136 139/240 3 DRAWING DEPICTS UNIT WITH OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT Features • Single source responsibility for the generator set and accesories. • Prototype and production tested to insure one step load acceptance per NFPA 110. • Two year limited warranty.on generator sets and accessories. • Unit conforms to CSA, NEMA, EGSA, ANSI and other standards. • Microprocessor based control system providing digital metering and monitoring. e Heavy duty 4 cycle industrial engine for reliability and fuel efficiency. • Brushless rotating field generator with class H insulation. • Heavy duty steel base.with integral vibration isolators. Generator Voltage. PH Hz LP / NAT. GAS 125'C Rise Standby Rating LP / NAT. GAS 105'C Rise Prime Rating kW /kVA Amps kW /kVA Amps UC1274C311 277/480 3 60 100/125 150 90/113 136 139/240 3 60 100 125 300 90/113 272 254/440 3 60 941/118 155 85/106 139 127/220 3 60 94/118 310 85/106 278 240/416 3 60 90/113 157 78/98 136 120/208 3 60 90/113 314 78/98 1 272 120/240 3 60 90/113 272 78/98 236 219/380 3 60 82/103 156 78/98 135 120/240 1 60 67.5/67.5 281 58.5/58.5 244 254/440 3 50 74/93 122 62/78 102 127/220 3 SO 74/93 244 62/78 204 120/208 3 50 80/100 278 67/84 233 240/415 3 50 80/100 139 67/84 117 219/380 3 50 80/100 152 67/84 128 110/190 3 50 80/100 304 67/84 255 110/220 1 50 60/60 273 50/50 227 UC1274D311 277/480 3 60 100/125 150 91/114 137 139/240 3 60 100/125 300 91/114 274 254/440 3 60 100/125 164 91/114 150 127/220 3 60 100/125 328 91/114 299 240/416 3 60 100/125 173 91/114 158 120/208 3 60 100/125 1 347 91/114 316 120/240 3 60 100/125 301 91/114 294 219/380 3 60 96/120 182 88/110 167 120/240 1 60 79/79 329 72/72 300 254/440 3 50 80/100 131 72/90 118 127/220 3 50 80/100 262 72/90 236 120/208 3 50 80/100 278 72/90 250 240/415 3 50 80/100 139 72/90 125 219/380 3 50 80/100 152 72/90 137 110 190 3 50 80/100 304 72/90 273 110 220 1 50 68/68 309 60/60 273 UCI274C06 120/240 1 60 90/90 375 75/75 313 UCI274D06 120/240 1 60 100/100 1 417 88A 1 367 RATINGS: All three —phase units are rated at 0.8 power factor. All single —phase units are rated ot1.0 power factor. STANDBY RATINGS: Standby ratings apply to installations served by a reliable utility source. The standby rating is applicable to varying loads . for the duration of a power outage. There is no overload capability for this rating. Ratings are in accordance with ISO- 3046/1, BS 5514, AS 2789, and DIN 6271. PRIME POWER R_ ATINGS: Prime power ratings apply to installations where utility power . in unavailable or unreliable. At varying load the number of generator set operating hours is unlimited. A, 10% overload capacity is available for one hour in twelve. Ratings are in 'accordance with 1S0- 8528 /1, overload power in accordance with ISO- 3046/1, BS5514, AS2789, and DIN 6271. For limited running time and base load ratings consult the factory. The generator set manufacturer reserves the right to change the design or specifications without notice and without any obligation or liability .whatsoever. GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR DERATION: Altitude: Derate 0.5% per 100m (328 ft.) elevation above 1000m (3279 ft.) Temperature: Derate 1.0% per 10'C (187) temperature above 40'C (1047). • • APPLICATION & EI&INEERING DATA ENGINE onan�t1T.- ATTnrTC - 60197 MHz LUBRICATION SYSTEM MANUFACTURER GENERAL MOTORS ENGINE: MODEL,TYPE VORTEC 8.1 L, 4 CYCLE NATURAL ASPIRIATION CYLINDER ARRANGEMENT V -8 DISPLACEMENT, L cu. in. 8.1 496 BORE & STROKE, mm in. 108 X 111 4.25 X 4.37 COMPRESSION RATIO 9.1:1 PISTON SPEED m min. ft. min. 399 1311 332 1092 MAIN BEARINGS: QUANTITY, TYPE ALUM. LEAD SILICON ALLOY RATED RPM 1800 1500 MAX. POWER AT RATED RPM, kW (HP) 121 (162) 99 (133) CYLINDER HEAD MATERIAL CAST IRON PISTON TYPE &MATERIAL STRUTLESS FLAT TOP HYPEREUTECTIC CAST ALUM. CRANKSHAFT MATERIAL CAST NODULAR UNDERCUT ROLLED FILLET VALVE EXHAUST MATERIAL INT. -A193 FXH. INCONEL GOVERNOR: TYPE, MAKE MODEL ELECTRONIC, WOODWARD FREQ. REG., NO -LOAD TO FULL -LOAD ISOCHRONOUS FRED. REG. , STEADY STATE +/- 0.5% FREQUENCY FIELD- CONVERTIBLE AIR CLEANER TYPE DRY VV"T.TATTQrV 60197 - SOH7. EXHAUST FLOW AT RATED kW 20.8 (735) 15.3 (540) m3 /min. (cfm) BATTERY CHARGING ALTERNATOR: 1.74 -2.74 7.0 -11.0 EXHAUST TEMPERATURE AT RATED kW 677 (1250) DRY EXHAUST, -C ('F) 12 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE BACK PRESS. 10.2 (3.0) kPa (in. Hg) 12 EXHAUST OUTLET SIZE AT 89 (3.5) ENGINE HOOKUP, mm in. 630 FN(,TNF. FI N..CTRICAL FUEL SYSTEM FUEL TYPE INDIVIDUAL COIL NEAR IGNITION SYSTEM PLUG IGNITION BATTERY CHARGING ALTERNATOR: 1.74 -2.74 7.0 -11.0 GROUND (NEGATIVE /POSITIVE) NEGATIVE VOLTS (DC) 12 AMPERE RATING 70 STARTER MOTOR RATED VOLTAGE DC 12 BATTERY, RECOMMENDED COLD CRANKING AMPS: FAN DIAMETER, INCLUDING BLADES, mm in. RATING FOR -18-C 0'F 630 BATTERY VOLTAGE DC 12 FUEL SYSTEM FUEL TYPE LP GAS OR NATURAL GAS FUEL SUPPLY LINE INLET 1.25 NPTF NATURAL GAS /LPG FUEL SUPPLY PRESSURE, kPa in. H20 1.74 -2.74 7.0 -11.0 CONTROL PANEL IypE FULL PRESSURE OIL AN CAPACITY, L t. 7.6 8.0 OIL PAN CAPACITY V ITH FILTER, L t. 8.0 8.5 OIL FILTER: QUANTITY, TYPE 1 CARTRIDGE rnnT iNf_ .QVQTR.M 60FIz 50Rz AMBIENT TEMPERATURE 'C 'F 50 122 ENGINE JACKET WATER CAPACITY, L al. 10.0 2.6 RADIATOR SYSTEM'CAPACITY INCLUDING ENGINE, L al. 20.6 (5.4) ENGINE JACKET WATER FLOW, L m m 125 33 102 27 HEAT REJECTED TO COOLING WATER AT RATED kW, DRY EXHAUST, kW (Btu/min. 73 (4140) 60 (3430) WATER PUMP TYPE CENTRIFUGAL 24.18`i�2 FAN DIAMETER, INCLUDING BLADES, mm in. 599 23.6 FAN, kWm (HP)6.7 9.0 3.7 5.0 MAX. RESTRICTION OF COOLING AIR, INTAKE & DISCHARGE SIDE OF RADIATOR, kpa in.H2O 0.125 (0.5) FUEL CONSUMPTION NATURAL GAS STANDBY RATING PRIME RATING -3 /h, f fht &T Y Indn Fin H7 50 H7 60 HZ 50 HZ 100% 33.0 1164 28.3 1001 30.2 (10651 25.0 918 75% 25.3 893 21.9 773 24.18`i�2 377 20.2 713 50% 21.1 745 15.6 552 19.14.6 285 6.1 517 25% 13.2 466 10.2 359 12. 187 9.8 344 0% 2.9 104 56 198 2.9 104 5.6 198 LP GAS ,,,3 /h, lrfhl AT % I An 100% 14.5 511 71.2 396 13.4 472 10.3 362 75% 11.4 403 8.6 302 10.7 377 8.0 282 50% 8.7 306 6.4 227 8.1 285 6.1 215 25% 5.5 195 4.5 (158). 5.3 187 4.3 151 0% 2.9 104 2.2 79 2.9 104 2.2 79 The DGC -2020 Digital Genset Controller provides integrated engine - genset control, protection, and metering in a single package. Microprocessor based technology allows for exact measurement, setpoint adjustment, and timing functions. Front panel controls and indicators enable quick and simple DGC -2020 operation. A wide temperature -range liquid crystal display (LCD) with backlighting can be viewed under a wide range of ambient light and temperature conditions. Features • Generator Metering • Engine Metering • Genset Control • Engine Protection • Generator Protection (27, 59, 810, 81U) • SAE J1939 Engine ECU communications • Multilingual capability • Remote RS -485 communications for Optional RDP -110 Remote Annunciator • Extremely rugged, fully encapsulated design • 16 programmable contact inputs Options • Additional (8) Programmable 2 Adc contacts • Remote Dial -out and Dial -in capablility with Internal Modem • Enhanced Generator Protection 51 and 47 • 7 contact outputs: (3) 30 Adc contacts (4) programmable 2 Adc rated contacts • Wide Ambient Temperature Range • Modbus Communications with RS -485 • Battery Backup for Real Time Clock • LCD Heater allows for use of DGC -2020 in temp. down to -40 °C • UL recognized, CSA certified, CE approved • HALT (Highly Accelerated Life Tests) tested • IP 54 Front Panel rating with integrated gasket • NFPA 110 Level Compatible GENERATOR SPILIFICATIONS STANDARDS INSULATION / IMPREGNATION UC224 and UC274 industrial generators The insulation system is Class W. meet the requirements of BS5000, All wound components are impregnated with VDE0530, UTE5100, NEMA MG1 -22, materials and processes designed specifically to CEMA, IEC34 -1, CSA22.2 AND AS1359. provide protection against the harsh enviroments encountered in generator applications. Varnishes and resins are selected and developed to provide EXCITATION SYSTEMS the high build required for static windings and the high mechanical strength required for rotating SX440 & SX460 AVRs components. With these self— excited systems the main stator provides power via the automatic WINDINGS & ELECTRICAL voltage regulator (AVR) to the exciter PERFORMANCE stator. The high efficiency semiconductors of the (AVR) ensure positive build up All generator stators are wound to .2/3 from initial low levels of residual voltage. pitch. This eliminates triplen (3rd, 9th, 15th...) The exciter rotor output is fed to the harmonics on the voltage waveform and is found main rotor through a three phase full wave to be the optimum design for trouble —free supply bridge rectifier. The rectifier is protected by of non linear loads. The 2/3 pitch design avoids a surge- suppressor against surges caused, excessive neutral currents, sometimes seen with for example, by short circuit or out of phase higher winding pitches, when in parallel with the paralleling. The SX440 will support a ran.cpe of mains. electronic accessories, including a 'droop A fully connected damper winding reduces Current .Transformer (CT) to permit parallel oscillations during paralleling. This winding, with operation with "other ac generators. 2/3 pitch and carefully selected pole and tooth designs, ensures very low waveform distortion. MX341 AVR is TELEPHONE INTERFERENCE This sophisticated AVR incorporated into the permanent magnet generator (PMG) THE (as defined by BS4999 Part 40) is better system, and is fitted as an option on than 2 %. TIF (as defined by ASA C50.1.2) is industrial generators. better than 50. The PMG provides power via the AVR to the. main exciter, giving a source of constant RADIO INTERFERENCE excitation power' independent of generator The absence of brushgear and the high quality output. The main, exciter output is then fed to AVR ensure low levels of interference with radio the main rotor, through a full wave bridge, transmissions. protected by a surge suppressor. The AVR has built —in protection against sustained du RFI suppression may be supplied if over— excitation, caused by internal or external external rre q red I faults. This de— excites the machine after a ENCLOSURE minimum. of 5 seconds. The two phase average voltage sensed IP22 (NEMA 1) is standard for all industrial MX341 provides voltage regulation of ±1,0%, generators Protection to IP23 (60 degrees from If three phase sensing is required with the vertical) is available as an option at reduced PMG system the MX321 AVR must be used. ratings (5% derate). We recommend three phase sensing for Inlet air filters are available as an option on applications with greatly unbalanced or highly all generators, at reduced ratings (5% derate). non — linear loads. An engine relief load acceptance feature can enable full load to be SHAFT applied to the generator in a single step. All generator rotors are dynamically balanced to MX321 AVR better than BS6861: Part 1 Grade 2.5 for The most sophisticated of all our AVRs minimum vibration in operation. combines all the features of the MX341 with, QUALITY ASSURANCE additionally, three phase rms sensing, for improved regulation .( 0.5 %) and performance. Generators are manufactured using production Over voltage protection is built —in and short- procedures having a quality assurance level circuit current level adjustment is an optional to BS EN (IS09001). facility. • • L7- Type 1 A A Part Number A Nominal Inlet Diameter B Body Da. O.D. C Body Length D Overall Length E Offset To Oft- F Offset To C/L G Inlet Lengt h 41220" 2.0 8.1 31.7 35.6 1.25 1.25 1.9 41225* 2.5 9.0 38.8 42.8 1.50 1.50 2.0 41230* 3.0 10.1 38.2 44.0 2.75 2.75 2.9 41235* 3.5 10.1 44.2 50.0 206 2.06 2.9 41240' 4.0 10.1 49.2 55.0 231 2.31 2.9 41250" 5.0 14.1 43.5 51.4 3.61 3.61 4.0 41260* 6.0 14.1 57.5 65A 3.60 3.60 4.0 41280 8.0 22.2 56.6 64.0 0 0 3.7 41282 10.0 22.2 84.7 92.0 0 0 3.7 41284 12.0 26.2 79.7 87.0 0 0 3.7 41286 14.0 36.2 94.6 101.0 0 0 3.2 41288 16.0 42.2 108.2 115.0 0 0 3.4 41299 18.0 42.3 108.2 114.9 0 0 3.3 41221 20.0 48.3 134.1 140.1 0 0 3.0 41222 22.0 54.3 135.5 143.2 0 0 3.9 *Inlet and outlet offset from centerline of silencer as shown in dimension E and F. Drain's are standard on all silencers with a 9" body diameter or larger. Note: Specifications are subject to change without notice. Note: All dimensions are in inches. 9 Type 3 Part Number A Nominal Inlet Diameter B Body Da. OD. C Body Length D Overall Length E Offset To CIL F Off set To UL G Inlet Length H Cutlet Length 43220 2.0 8.1 31.7 32.8 3.4 0 2.0 1.9 43225 1 2.5 9.0 38.8 40.8 4.4 1.5 2.5 2.0 43230 3.0 10.1 38.2 41.11 4.1 1.8 3.0 2.9 43235 3.5 10.1 44.2 47.1 4.6 2.1 3.0 2.9 43240 4.0 10.1 49.2 51.0 5.1 0 3.0 2.9 43250 5.0 14.1 43.5 45.7 5.8 2.6 4.0 3.9 43260 6.0 14.1 57.6 61.5 6.8 3.1 4.0 3.9 43280 8.0 22.2 56.6 60.3 11.3 0 4.0 3.7 43282 10.0 22.2 84.7 88.31 11.3 0 4.0 3.6 43284 12.0 26.2 79.8 83.4 12.9 0 4.0 3.6 43286 14.0 36.2 94.7 97.9 15.3 0 4.0 3.2 43288 16.0 42.1 108.2 111.6 16.1 0 4.0 3.4 43299 18.0 42.2 108.2 111.5 19.1 3.3 43221 20.0 48.3 134.1 137.1 19.8 3.0 43222 22.0 54.3 135.6 139.4 21.8 Et 3.8 Type 4 H B. F G Part Number A Nominal Inlet Diameter B Body Diameter O.D. C Body Length D Overall Lengthi E Offset To C/L F Off set To C/L G Inlet Lencith H Cutlet Length 44640 4.0 10.1 49.2 52.1 24.6 0 3.0 2.9 44650 5.0 14.1 1 43.6 47.5 1 21.8 2.6 1 4.0 3.9 44660 6.0 14.1 57.6 61.5 28.8 3.1 4.0 3.9 44680 8.0 22.1 54.6 58.3 26.3 0 4.0 3.7 44682 10.0 22.1 84.6 88.2 42.3 0 4.0 3.6 44684 12.0 26.1 79.5 83.4 39.9 0 4.0 3.6 44686 14.0 36.2 88.7 91.9 44.3 0 4.0 3.2 TAYLOR POWER SYSTEMS 461 HIGHWAY 49 SOUTH RICHLAND, MS. 39218 PH: 1- 800 - 367 -7639 � TAYLORO "°" SOUND ATTENUATED WEATHER HOUSINGS DS9M2 - DS175M3 & GS25 - GS150 I a o " .B•. L— —J L "A TYPE 1 TYPE .2 MODEL TYPE "A" "11399 "C" "D" "E" " F" "WEIGHT, ENCLOSURE ONLY DS9M2 1 48" 30" 50" 64" 43" 2.5" 28" .625" DIA. QTY. 4 380 LBS DS13M2 1 48" 30" 50" 64" 43" 2.5" 28" .625" DIA. QTY. 4 380 LBS DS16M2 1 55" 30" 50" 73" 43" 6" 28" .625" DIA. QTY. 4 400 LBS DS20M2 1 55" 30" 50" 73" 1 43" 6" 28" .625" DIA. QTY. 4 400 LBS DS30M2 2 66" 36" 62" 91" 30" 6" 34" .625" DIA. (QTY.. 6) 465 LBS DS45M2/DS60M2 2 81" 36" 62" 106" 34.5" 6" 34" .625" DIA. (QTY. 6 ) 525 LBS DS80M2/ DS100M2 2 81" 36" 68" 111" 34.5" 6" 34" .625" DIA. QTY. 6 550 LBS DS140M3- DS175M3 2 108" 46" 68" 138" 48" 6" 44" .625" DIA. QTY. 6 710 LBS GS25 1 60" 32" 1 56" 85" 48" 6" 30" .625" DIA. QTY. 4 455 LBS GS45 2 68" 42" 1 54" 92" 34.5" 6" 40" .625" DIA. QTY. 6 500 LBS GS60 2 81" 42" 54" 105" 34.5" 6" 40" .625" DIA. QTY. 6 575 LBS GS80 2 90" 44" 68" 1 120" 39" 6" 42" .625" DIA. QTY. 6 670 LBS GS100 2 90" 44" 68" 120" 39" 6" 42" .625" DIA. QTY. 6 670 LBS GS125 2 90" 44" .68" 120" 39" 6" 42" .625" DIA. QTY. 6 670 LBS GS150 2 96" 44" 68" 126" 42" 6" 42" 1 .625" DIA. QTY. 6 710 LBS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. WEATHER ENCLOSURE FEATURES: 14 gauge Galvanneal construction. The doors are also provided with hinges and key locking latches to prevent tampering. Fixed louver above side doors on generator set to provide ample intake air. Perforated air discharge opening above air discharge duct. Radiator fill access hole in top of enclosure with plug. Space Saver Muffler mounted inside enclosure in updraft. Entire enclosure is Powder Coat painted to ensure long lasting durable finish. • • • • STANDARD FEATURES AND ACCESSORIES Standard Features Accessories • Heavy duty steel base • Vibration isolators • Oil drain valve with extension • Flex exhaust connector • Battery rack • Battery cables • Water jacket heater • Owners manual • Electronic Isochronous Governor Accessories ❑ Exhaust silencer ❑ Silencer mounting kit for enclosure ❑ Weather enclosure ❑ Sound attenuated enclosure ❑ Flexible fuel lines ❑ Oil pan heater ❑ Battery ❑ Battery heater ❑ Battery charger ❑ PMG exciter TAYLOR POWER SYSTEMS 461 Hwy. 49S Richland, Mississippi 39218 Phone (601)- 932 -5674 Toll Free 1 -800- 367 -7639 FAX (601)- 9324028 Web Site www.taylorpower.com ❑ Generator strip heater ❑ Line circuit breaker. ❑ DGC -2020 Enhanced generator protection ❑ DGC -2020 Internal Modem ❑ DGC -2020 Programmable Aux. Contacts qty. (8) 2Adc ❑ Surface Mount Remote Annunciator ❑ Flush Mount Remote Annunciator ❑ Analog Auto —Start Control Panel WEIGHTS AND DIMENSIONS Overall Size, L x W x H, in Weight (wet): 2400 Lb.. �W--- H I L� GS100 (90- x 44' x 60 -) Note: This drawing is provided for reference only and should not be used for planning installation. Contoat your local distributor for more detailed information. DISTRIBUTED BY: TPSGS10007 • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification. Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 1 6 vGSS` CO- u1" 1 Dear Neighbor, tT NOV 19 ZU0 i CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project,. you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. I I Neighbor Name: K i Y l Date: Signature: Neighbor Address: i 6 S3 ye ssi A/ 5 Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: —ro py YE,4 rHE=iZ 3, 6 Date: 0 Application Number: Revised 10/24106 PAFornu & Procedures\design review applications.doc 5 • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 5,4 01 -A--TO &-t A Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans, are, preliminary an d may change. If you have further interest in the project,. you may contact. the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. 76 Name: j H j��"� Date: G' Neighbor Nam 1 Kir -, signature Neighbor Address: Neighbor Phone #: % c? 37?- � If:I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: O M IYCA-7 -ff Date: Application Number: Revised 10/24/06 P: \Fomu & Procedures\design review aW ications.doc 5 • C • • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form 1 PROJECT ADDRESS: .5`,� r? -A--ro &r A- e Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARYONLYand may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga 's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: SA Nb j 5A,-1 CS L A t1AAc-K Date: Y 15 107_ Signature:`�YI�- Neighbor Address: LLL U —e55 I -D S,,, U GL C Neighbor Phone #: Z 0 7!Y — S If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following ( please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: kvi 496 b1 �'� Date: • Application Number: Revised 10/24/06 PAForms & Procedures design review applications.doc 5 0 City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: NO Dear Neighbor, I ain proposing a projec-t at the above slated address and would like to provide you with an opporlunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent naighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property (ire being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being. made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for ilia project. 'These plans are PRLI 1/VIINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact. the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a .reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an oppor -tunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary Fuld may change. if you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below eenifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: , � i t (� C) P\E Date: Neighbor Address: Vass /,) Cq IR . _ 14681.bor Pltnne if I have any initial concerns with the project I may list there below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant None::' o t g V /,E ,*Lf Ef,0 Date: Application Number:, .City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 P.-Torms & Prueedureslneighbor iotificarion.doc Zt.2'8 9281 bz0S9 :01 SSS8L9880b !Tanning Department • • 0 U90lbadS d0 AlIo:w0j3 bS:ST L002- 92 -d3S • • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROTECT ADDRESS: �` G�55/ Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice. as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary an d may change. If you have further interest in the project,. you may contact. the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: , V I &) CTf Date: / / S- Signature: Neighbor Address: I e S n Cl 6i ,�� CA Neighbor Phone #: �O � U � -7 3 7 I If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: ' V>-% � -� c y- �' t.' Date: Application Number:. Revised 10/24/06 PAForms & Procedures\design review applications.doc 5 Attachment 5 • City of Saratoga Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 408 - 868 -1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Saratoga's Planning Commission announces a public hearing on the item described below on: Wednesday, the 14`h day of November 2007, at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held at the Civic Theater at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Details are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. The public hearing item is: APPLICATION /ADDRESS: # CUP07 -0003 Boger, 18681 Vessing Court APPLICANT /OWNER: Boger APNs: 397 -05 -086 Description: APPLICATION #: - The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to install an emergency generator for his residence. The generator would be located in a detached enclosed accessory structure. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a Public Hearing in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing. In order for information to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed on or before Tuesday, February 6, 2007. This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor's office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out -of —date informationi or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all residents potentially affected by a project. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Christopher Riordan, AICP Senior Planner 408 - 868 -1235 40 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, Denise Kaspar , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the 19"' day of October 2007, that I deposited 39 notices in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to -wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15- 45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property described as: Address: 18681 Vessing Court AP N : 397 -05 -086 that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. • • Denise Kaspar` Advanced Listing Services I* • lctober 19, 2007 J0' Ownership Listing repared for: )7 -05 -086 HOMAS R & HEATHER BOGER 3681 VESSING CT ARATOGA CA 95070 )7 -04 -022 OSSANA B & EUGENE CHAU D BOX 9270 ANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 -4270 )7 -04 -043 IMOTHY W REINHARDT R CURRENT OWNER 1660 SOBEY RD ARATOGA CA 95070 -6234 )7 -04 -055 KASHA NOELLE R CURRENT OWNER 1470 SOBEY RD ARATOGA CA 95070 -5609 )7 -05 -031 HOMAS GURNEE R CURRENT OWNER 3545 VESSING RD ARATOGA CA 95070 -5613 )7 -05 -044 DRETTA HILLIG R CURRENT OWNER 1372 OLD WOOD RD ARATOGA CA 95070 -5633 )7 -05 -061 OBERT L & KAYLENE THURSTON . R CURRENT OWNER 1324 CORDWOOD CT ARATOGA CA 95070 -5628 )7 -05 -074 OSALIE CACITTI R CURRENT OWNER 1501 EVANS IN ARATOGA CA 95070 -5601 )7 -05 -087 rEPHEN MOORRE R CURRENT OWNER 1691 VESSING RD ARATOGA CA 95070 -5613 397 -04 -026 MARTIN A & LINDA FORMICO OR CURRENT OWNER 14456 SOBEY RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5609 397 -04 -044 ROBERT FRAZER OR CURRENT OWNER 14670 SOBEY RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6234 397 -04 -092 GORDON E DAVIS OR CURRENT OWNER 14466 SOBEY RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5609 397 -05 -042 DAVID H & JENNIFER PITZEN OR CURRENT OWNER 14416 OLD WOOD RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5633 397 -05 -045 MARIO N & MYRIAM CORDERO OR CURRENT OWNER 14358 CORDWOOD CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -5628 397 -05 -062 ROBERT E & ELLEN COUSINS OR CURRENT OWNER 14330 CORDWOOD CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -5628 397 -04 -037 ARTHUR Y & SHELLEY YU OR CURRENT OWNER 14680 SOBEY RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6234 397 -04 -054 RICHARD H & CAROL FORTE OR CURRENT OWNER 14474 SOBEY RD. SARATOGA CA 95070 -5609 397 -05 -029 AUSTIN M & BARBARA KILBURN OR CURRENT OWNER 18531 VESSING RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5613 397 -05 -043 R & M BLAKE OR CURRENT OWNER 14394 OLD WOOD RD SARATOGA CA. 95070 -5633 . 397 -05 -046 DONALD W & DALE BOYLE OR CURRENT OWNER 14336 CORDWOOD CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -5628 397 -05 -067 JAMES G & SANDRA LA MAACK OR CURRENT OWNER 1.8601 VESSING RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5613 397 -05 -085 397 -05 -086 MICHAEL A & CAROL VAN BUSKIRK THOMAS R & HEATHER BOGER OR CURRENT OWNER 900 CAMILLE LN 18653 VESSING RD MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94040 -2668 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5613 397 -05 -097 F & KATHERINE DUNLAP OR CURRENT OWNER 14472 SOBEY RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5609 397 -05 -098 NEAL P & LILLIAN KIRKHAM OR CURRENT OWNER 14468 SOBEY RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5609 • • • �-OS -101 397 -05-102 397 -05- 103,104 )'7-05-101 ROMUALDAS V &DEBORAH BE & MAUREEN PIRAMOON KURT GUTTENBERG BRIZGYS 3 VESSING RD 18579 VESSING RD wOGA CA 95070 -5613 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5613 SARATOGA EVANS LN SARATOGA CA A 95070 -5601 )7 -06 -028 AN U & MANN BANERJE R CURRENT OWNER 3594 VESSING RD ARATOGA CA 95070 -5656 37 -06 -046 HOMAS F & BONNIE MUELLER R CURRENT OWNER 3564 VESSING RD ARATOGA CA 95070 -5656 J7 -06 -108. REED R SHAKERI R CURRENT OWNER 3632 VESSING CT ARATOGA CA 95070 -5666 )7 -06 -111 LENN M & BRENDA YAMASAKI R CURRENT OWNER 3668 VESSING RD TOGA CA 95070 -5659 • 397 -06 -030 VITO & MARIA MINETTI OR CURRENT OWNER 18680 VESSING RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5672 397 -06 -048 LINDSETH LIVING TRUST OR CURRENT OWNER 18620 VESSING RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5659 397 -06 -109 JOHN J & LUCY HUANG OR CURRENT OWNER 18644 VESSING CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -5666 CITY OF SARATOGA ATTN: THERESE SCHMIDT 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE SARATOGA CA 95070 397 -06 -037 DONALD H & SHIRLEY HAMBEY OR CURRENT OWNER 18600 VESSING RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5659 397 -06 -054 PAUL & LIVIA HUG OR CURRENT OWNER 18540 VESSING RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5656 397 -06 -110 BRUCE A & CATHERINE THOMPSON OR CURRENT OWNER 18656 VESSING RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5659 Advanced Listing Services P.O Box 2593 Dana Point CA 92624 Attachment 6 U • I I • 9 Note; e w 0 m e r e n c N - _ ss , .. e n e r a o r ------------------------------ � sr�! oeano" (SOUT) Project Data Consultants 00 O r Project Address: 18681 Vessing Ct. Zoning: RI 40,000 APN: 397 Structural Engineer. Quilici Engineers Inc. Ph:408.583.0323 30 Union Ave. Suite 200 -05 -086 Proposed Generator and Enclosure Campbell, Ca. 95008 Fx::408.583.0329 Generator Sructure 145 Sq. Ft. Civil Engineer. Westfall Engineers Inc. Ph :408.867.0244 Existing Pool Equip. 182 Sq. Ft. 14583 Big Basin Way Main House: 4464.1 Sq. Ft. Garage /Pool /Guest: 824 Saratoga, Ca. 95070 Ph:408.399.6929 om New Total: 5615 Sq. Ft. Ave. Slope: 21.7% Surveyor. Dunbar and Craig N Santa Cruz Ave. Suite 104 ea e Site Area: (Gross) 54,284 Sq, Ft. Los Gatos, Ca. 95070 Ph:831.372.8328 Los Site Area: (Net) 37,456 Sq. Ft. Title 24: Impervious Coverage: Monterey Energy Group ` Structures: 5288.1 Sq. Ft Pool: 735 Sq. Ft 227 Forest Ave. Suite 5 Pool Terrace: 1245 Sq. R. Under Trellis Paving: 991 Sq. Ft. Morning Trellis: 327 Sq. Ft. Pacific Grove, Ca. 93950 Fx.831.372.4613 Soils Report (Geotechnical Investigation Report for Single Family Residence) U o e r Ipe Decking: 1277 Sq. Ft Conc. Ramp 198 Sq. Ft Door Landings: 2173 Sq. Ft Door Landings: 402 SS Alliance Env. and Soil Engineering 1400 Coleman Ave. Suite C 16 -F . Generator Structure: 82 Sq. Ft. Santa Clara. Ca. 95050 Ph:408.970.8685 w\ O 2. �� Total Impervious: 12818 Sq. Ft. (23 %) G\�� �1 p Index to Drawings Add 9.0 Project Info Add 9.1 Proximity Applicable Codes a. California Fire Code 2001 Edition (2000 UFC) b. Califomia Building Code 2001 Edition (1997 UBC) c. California Mech. Code 2001 Edition (2000 UMC) �f ' 7, lk t r ^ rr T * L�� L `7 Plan Add 9.2 Plan Add 9.3 Elevations d. California Plumbing Code 2001 Edition 2000 UPC) e. California Electrical Code 2001 Edition (1999 NEC) f. 2005 California Efficiency Standards Energy y g. Any other applicable local and state laws and regulations r�� ° ° 1'� l �� 4 �• 7 \( t 1 }�� 00Y 4 �V + {' //�\ U ' I U O LUU UU U ! O r •' ?4 °' ' 0ti] CAw 3�o.eo26 sa1 3ao cam /\7 4 moderndesigncolelaborative I DATE .. . 1:07.. .. . ..... DRAWN 8C CHq Qlne Title Sheet Project Location No Scale 4 • 11 ' • n J Generator Generator Proximity to Easterly/Westerly Southerly Easterly/Westerlyand Southerly Neighbor 1/16 " =1' -0" 215- TI v "D,m En.wo�x eo, CA 9401 " M1650134o.e1x6 f 16501340. 1.16 www.n,oe<�" a "�e.00m moderndesigncollaborative DATE: ..II /II /07 . .................... Dxewe er, gyq.Qiine .............. El • a • f 0 --------------- V.I ------ OP I ------ -- ---- - ;�7 V 0 7 ---- ------- t4EW 1 Cummirl� ;St rage uo 80 - - ----- �jj_ o Ustin ------ li o _I - - -- Emergincy .... . ---- -- Pool___ -7 ----- ------ Electrical Generator Equipmenf--_-.-_ - Equipment Existing Concrete Retaining W.11 r v Generator Enclosure Plan 1 1 1/4"= P-O` IV L— - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - --- - - - - -- - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — - — 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - — - — - — - — - 30'-0" Front Yard Set-Back 2 I Generator Enclosure Roof Plan L 6 2, L 'n, L ;c t ; 6 L phi A d' z e, 'n, 12, L L 0' 41 11 o e, 71,11-17 I F (6501340. ­6 moderndesigncollaborative Dn IE: JUIP ................... Dltn.n .1 CUftg-Rl; .................. • • Elevations 3/8"= P-O" ------------------------- ---- IL--------- ------ ------- ---- - -- --1 Existing Pool Equip. New Generator Street Elevation (South) Existing Pool Equip, 11 New Generator FI. r, -i L— -J Existing Pool Equip. I New Generator I Side Elevation (East) womB moderridesigricollaborative tll DATE: ...................... DRAWN BY. Curt Glne ............... • • Item 3 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No. & Location: 07 -253; 20455 Herriman Avenue Type of Application: Conditional Use Permit Applicant/Owner: metroPCS (Applicant) Presbyterian Church of San Jose (owner) Staff Planner: Heather Bradley, Contract Planner ) Meeting Date: December 12, 2007 APN: 393 -41 -032 Department Head: John F. Livingstone, AICP e 5J AG 8r_ PLY�w o �I� t'K,c.-� 1 ai 1 t3 I u $AiiATOGA VISTA N Im i a, IM) I o •,7 .1: S p L aI sT .�J�• A B,:Y a « n - �� • . 1 n I C I .. -- Em - �.. y�. n,.... E LANE — VISTA _'j 1nE, - - us � y 1 fJ1 ? CHALET « LN. - a. -j . b". ... _ ' •'IA .,., ,m« r Z D 17 M M.3 ; ...,r,1 ;o° I w I °" I �,.,. I _ _ - •a _he _ j .,.,� . I -� r 32 , •14 ym a �G s i sme i ` O « i:.' I': ` i2 W: }- ICJC ew.sor. t W ---= •'m'--- / I « I I r-:u__ ---- a° �` ` i-1 i< � � �` i ~` I t c ly _4 sa s re a ;fie 2P a= Co tCD I 1 I I 1 xm { 8 ;s s ,io 11 12 3 r ,71 J1 axl r' I R7 ,>< k`e 8' •C Ta M• J321 ,```•;k. A. = �„„ ALLE MENa1CN ' VILU � °.. Z �y � �•��p{ t•7 4 �� r •/ - a •' IS' qq • n . 500 1. 1N x r" e °••, rpti ,� >ZS a dQ yI. « Iz N1° ,� 1. ii'w�kg aAY.: t HERRIMAN- ---r�. Zvi Io Subject: y Jv 20455 Herriman Ave s s 2 1 1 APN: 39341 -032 � 1 500' 500' Radius z - r M m CP 3 DEE RK CT. na _ .q e� i, w } ,zr a- W-y Los J2• GAT JOINT UNION NIGH SCHOOL' - D;ISTRI CT ' •'' t.' 20455 Herriman Avenue Application No. 07 -0253; 20455 Herriman Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to locate a wireless facility at the Presbyterian Church on Herriman Avenue. at Saratoga Avenue. The project consists of a new cross structure with concealed antennas and a new equipment cabinet screened by existing landscape. The lot size is 4.22 acres and the site is zoned R -1- 12,500. PERMANENT CONDITIONS No permanent conditions of approval are required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Conditional Use Permit application by adopting the attached Resolution. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY Application filed: 07/20/06 Application complete: 04/23/07 Notice published: 05/09/07 Mailing completed: 05/04/07 Posting completed: 05/17/07 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to locate a wireless facility at the Presbyterian Church on Herriman Avenue. at Saratoga Avenue. The project consists of a new cross structure with concealed antennas and a new equipment cabinet screened by existing landscape. The lot size is 4.22 acres and the site is zoned R -1- 12,500. PERMANENT CONDITIONS No permanent conditions of approval are required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Conditional Use Permit application by adopting the attached Resolution. Application No. 07 -0253; 20455 Herriman Avenue PROJECT DATA ZONING: R -1- 12,500. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential MEASURE G: Not applicable. PARCEL SIZE: 4.22 acres AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: Not applicable GRADING REQUIRED: None ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed project, which includes installation of an equipment cabinet and concealed antennas, is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 of the Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA. This Class 3 exemption applies to new construction of limited small new facilities; installation of small, new equipment and facilities in small structures. PROPOSED EXTERIOR MATERIALS AND COLORS The proposed antenna cables will be concealed within cable tray painted to match the existing exposed roof beam. The antennas will be concealed within a new cross that will replace the existing cross in the same location on the roof and will be painted a similar dark brown color as the existing cross. PROJECT DISCUSSION MetroPCS requests Conditional Use Permit approval to locate a wireless facility at the Presbyterian Church at the corner of Herriman Avenue and Saratoga Avenue. This application was originally submitted in February of this year and staff asked for some minor changes to the plan to help conceal the cables. The result is that the cables will be concealed within a cable tray along right underside of the existing roof and a fake tray will match on the left underside of the roof. The equipment cabinet will be placed above ground, however the applicant has demonstrated that the cabinet will be adequately screened from view by existing vegetation. The existing cross will be removed and replaced with a 7- foot -2 -inch cross that will be approximately 4 inches taller than the existing cross and of a similar design. Correspondence and Neighbor Review Staff has received Neighbor Notification Forms from four neighbors. The applicant attempted to contact approximately 11 neighbors. See attachment #3. Application No. 07 -0253; 20455 Herriman Avenue Arborist Review No trees are proposed for removal. The City Arborist has identified three ordinance -protected American* sweetgum trees on the property that could potentially be impacted by the, proposed construction. The trees will be protected in accordance with the City Arborist's recommendations which- have been incorporated into the attached Resolution as conditions of approval. The City Arborist has recommended that a bond be posted for the full value of the protected trees in the amount of $19,080. FCC Requirements Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has exclusive jurisdiction over RF emissions from personal wireless antenna facilities. Pursuant to its authority under federal law, the FCC has established rules to regulate the safety of emissions from these facilities. The applicant has provided a cumulative RF exposure report, which concludes that the RF energy is well below the Maximum Permissible Exposure limit established by the FCC. See Attachment #4. Since the applicant has documented compliance with federal exposure limits, under. the Telecommunication Act, the City can evaluate and regulate only the aesthetic aspects of wireless installations. Any concerns regarding health or safety aspects of the wireless sites are not within the purview of the Planning Commission. Surrounding Land Uses Surrounding land use include residential neighborhoods to the north, east and west, and Saratoga High School to the south. Location and Alternative Sites As indicated by the existing and proposed coverage maps (Attachment 5), the location for the antenna facility will improve the wireless coverage metroPCS provides within Saratoga. The applicant has looked into several options and has concluded that this location best fits the needs of metroPCS. Staff finds this location to be appropriate,. given that the facility will be concealed and appropriately inconspicuous. Please refer to Attachment #2 Correspondence from the applicant for more detail regarding the location and alternative sites. Conditional Use Permit Findings Staff believes the proposed project is consistent with Conditional Use Permit findings stated in City Code Section 15- 55.070 and furthermore believes they can be made in the affirmative. The text and follow -up discussion regarding each finding is below. a) The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zoning district in which the site is located. The project meets this finding in that the proposed antennas will improve the quality of service provided by the wireless carrier. The location for the project is appropriate, as it will be well concealed within the church roof and cross, and the equipment cabinet will be well screened by existing vegetation. Application No. 07 -0253; 20455 Herriman Avenue b) The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project meets this finding in that the wireless carrier has submitted a report, which concludes that the proposed site will comply with the FCC's current standard for limiting exposure to RF energy. Since the FCC has jurisdiction on the health aspects of wireless sites that are demonstrated to comply with FCC guidelines for emissions, the proposal is assumed to not be detrimental to the public health and welfare. Therefore, this finding can be made in the affirmative. c) The proposed establishment will comply with all applicable provisions of the Saratoga Municipal Code. The project meets this finding in that the proposal complies with all provisions of the City Code. d) The proposed conditional use will not adversely affect existing or anticipated uses in the immediate neighborhood, and will not adversely affect surrounding properties or the occupants thereof. The project meets this finding in that the proposed wireless facility will not adversely affect immediate uses and properties in the vicinity, as the proposed antennas will be well concealed within the roof and cross of the church and the equipment cabinet will be screened by existing vegetation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the proposed wireless facility (Application 07- 253) by adopting the attached Resolution. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 07 -253 2. Correspondence from Applicant's representative dated May 25, 3. Neighbor Notification forms 4. Radio Frequency Exposure Report (Hammett & Edison, Inc dated January 22, 2007) 5. Arborist Report dated October 23, 2007 6. 2007Affidavit of mailing notices, public hearing notice, mailing labels, and newspaper publication 7. Photo simulations and coverage maps 8. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A" • Application No. 07 -0253; 20455 Herriman Avenue RESOLUTION NO. Application No. 07 -253 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA metroPCS 20455 Herriman Avenue Antenna and equipment cabinet WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a wireless facility on the roof of an existing church. The system is comprised of antennas concealed within a new cross and an equipment cabinet. The site is located in a Residential Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds the proposed project consisting of the installation of an equipment cabinet and concealed antennas is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 of the Public Resources Code (CEQA); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that all of the findings for approval required within Article 15 -55 of the City Code can be made in the affirmative. The following is a discussion of each of the findings: a) The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zoning district in which the site is located. The project meets this finding in that the proposed antennas will improve the quality of service provided by the wireless carrier. The location for the project is appropriate, as it will be well concealed within the church roof and cross, and the equipment cabinet will be well screened by existing vegetation. b) The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project meets this finding in that the wireless carrier has submitted a report, which concludes that the proposed site will comply with the FCC's current standard for limiting exposure to RF energy. Since the FCC has jurisdiction on the health aspects of wireless sites that are demonstrated to comply with FCC guidelines for emissions, the proposal is assumed to not be detrimental to the public health and welfare. Therefore, this finding can be made in the affirmative. c) The proposed establishment will comply with all applicable provisions of the Saratoga Municipal Code. The project meets this finding in that the proposal complies with all provisions of the City Code. Application No. 07 -0253; 20455 Herriman Avenue d) The proposed conditional use will not adversely affect existing or anticipated uses in the immediate neighborhood, and will not adversely affect surrounding properties or, the occupants thereof. The project meets this finding in that the proposed wireless facility will not adversely affect immediate uses and properties in the vicinity, as the proposed antennas will be well concealed within the roof and cross of the church and the equipment cabinet will be screened by existing vegetation. Now, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the proposed use and exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the application for a Conditional Use Permit approval is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: PERMANENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. All conduits on exterior facade of building shall be painted to match exterior of building. The paint shall be maintained in perpetuity and the exterior of the building shall not be cluttered with cabling, connection hardware, or other components. 2. The equipment cabinet shall be as low as possible and shall screened by vegetation that shall be maintained in perpetuity, as shown on Exhibit "A." PLANNING 3. The Planning Commission shall retain continuing jurisdiction over the Conditional Use Permit and may, at any time; modify, delete or impose any new conditions of the permit to preserve the public.health, safety, and welfare. 4. Any intensification of this use shall require approval of an amended Conditional Use Permit. 5. If the subject site is decommissioned in the future,. all antennas and related equipment shall be removed within thirty (30) days of cessation of operation. 6. The proposed service light shall remain off until needed. When utilized, the light shall be screened with appropriate cover so as to reduce glare to neighbors, vehicular traffic, and/or pedestrians. 7. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, detailed construction plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division for Zoning Clearance to verify consistency with the approved Exhibit "A" plans. The construction drawings shall incorporate a signed copy of this Resolution as a separate plan page. 8. The proposed use shall at all times operate in compliance with all regulations of the City and/or other agencies having jurisdictional authority over the use pertaining to, but not limited to, health, sanitation, safety, radio frequency and water quality issues. Application No. 07 -0253; 20455 Herriman Avenue 9. Prior to issuance of Final Building permit the applicant's Radio Frequency Engineer shall conduct a test of the Radio Frequency (RF) emission levels and submit a letter of verification that actual radiation levels generated by the facility meet current Federal standards. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 10. Applicant shall comply with all Saratoga Fire District requirements. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 11. No new overhead lines are permitted. 12. Encroachment Permit shall be issued by the Public Works Department for work in public right- of -way prior to commencement of work. CITY ATTORNEY 13. Applicant agrees to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. Section 2. A Building Permit must be issued and construction or business operations commenced within thirty -six (36) months from the date of adoption of this Resolution or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15- 55.080 and 15 -90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. Application No. 07 -0253; 20455 Herriman Avenue PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 12th day of December 2007 by the following roll call vote: AYES:. NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Joyce Hlava Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: John F. Livingstone, AICP Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property.Owner or Authorized Agent Date • • 0 ATTACHMENT 2 • C VIV s' • May 25, 2007 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, California 95070 RE: Conditional Use Permit Application 07 -253 MetroPCS Wireless Communications Facility 20455 Herriman Avenue, Saratoga, California Attention Heather Bradley This is in response to plan check comments sent March 12, 2007 Statement of Purpose MetroPCS Inc. is a publicly held telecommunications service provider formed in 1994 and holds 14 personal communications' services (PCS) licenses in the United States. MetroPCS offers an innovative and affordable pricing structure to capitalize on wireless customers' demand of sensitivity to price. Relative to current wireless service packages. metroPCS offers more affordable wireless service packages that are available to more citizens of the Bay Area. For example, MetroPCS offers subscribers unlimited minutes to use within the local calling area for only $35.00 per month and unlimited local and nationwide minutes for $40.00 per month. MetroPCS' customer base is growing rapidly which has created a need to improve and enhance coverage. To benefit those living and working in the City of Saratoga, metro PCS proposes to construct and operate a telecommunication facility at the 14407 Big Basin Way. As shown in the coverage maps submitted metroPCS the area surrounding the proposed site labeled 1816 on the coverage map shows a significant gap in coverage where no service is available. Areas where good coverage exists are shown in green on the coverage maps, yellow areas indicate average coverage, areas in red indicate poor coverage and finally all other colors indicate no coverage at all. Underground Equipment Alternative MetroPCS works very hard to design good sites that are screened from public view. This location was able to provide metroPCS with an equipment location that is completely screened from public view by utilizing an existing fence that completely screens the cabinets from public view.. By using the existing conditions metroPCS is able to achieve the desired level of screening.that is sought when locating equipment underground. By locating the equipment at the proposed location metroPCS is able to limit the size and scope of the project. No additional screening is proposed beyond the existing fence. No additional landscape is being proposed. All existing landscaping is to remain. • 2298 - 3rd Street- San Francisco, CA 94107 . fax 415 480 -1406 Current and Proposed Cell Sites MetroPCS has four projects in process and three existing with the City of Saratoga. These sites are shown in blue on the coverage maps provided. The sites are numbered 1816, 1817, 1818, and 1920. All sites have been submitted to zoning, with the exception of 1818 which has already received zoning approval Alternative Locations The objective of the proposed site is to provide coverage to an area that currently has poor coverage. MetroPCS has existing sites that lie to the East and North of the site shown as 710 and 131 on the coverage maps submitted. To the South lies a proposed site shown as 1817. To build the most efficient network metroPCS tries to minimize the overlapping of sites. Whenever possible metroPCS attempts to co- locate on buildings with existing facilities after a search of the area no possible co- locatable facilities were located. There were only two possible candidates in the search area. The first candidate selected was 20300 Herriman. Representatives of metroPCS contacted Saratoga High, but the school was not interested in a hosting a facility. At this time metroPCS contacted Saratoga Presbyterian. Forecast MetroPCS has no additional plans of increasing the network beyond the site list provided. Technological Advances MetroPCS carefully examines every site and uses the most current equipment available at the time of construction. This allows metroPCS to build sites that are smaller and easier to screen then other carriers. The typical metroPCS site consists of three panel antennas and one equipment cabinet with a battery back up unit. This site metroPCS has reduced its' normal configuration and gone with the smallest antenna available to any carrier. Compared to other carriers that look to add six to twelve antennas and four to six equipment cabinet's metro is using the most compact equipment available to achieve the goal of providing coverage to its customers. Photo - Simulations Photo - simulations show all associated equipment and cables that can be seen from public views, and a photo - simulation shown from the inside of the existing fence. Required Height The height of the existing cross is to increase by 1.25 inches. Please see sheet LS 1. showing the existing cross to be 49'6 ". 2298 - Yd Street- San Francisco, CA 94107 • fax 415 480 -1406 11 v Cable Tray The cable tray has been modified to be an architectural feature of the building. The cable tray will be painted and techtured to match the existing walls of the church and go down both sides of the roof eave. Details are shown in the included photo simulations. A -1 Note The note on A -1 shows the existing PG &E pole that metroPCS is proposing to pull power and telephone services from otherwise referred to as point of connection (P.O.Q. No antennas will be placed on the pole. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have and note my contact information r has changed. Sincerely Tom Spaulding 2298 P Street San Francisco, CA 941.07 650.380.3140 tom @townconsulting.com 2298 - Y6 Street• San Francisco, CA 94107 -fax 415 480 -1406 • • � ATTACHMENT 3 • • • Neighbor Notification: Proposed Metro PCS site at 20455 Herriman Avenue, Saratoga On July 12, 2007, Tom Spaulding of Town Consulting walked door -to -door to hand- deliver notices and sets of plans for the proposed Metro PCS site at 20455 Herriman Avenue. Below is a summary of his results: .20446 Chalet Lane: owner signed; notice attached 20454 Chalet Lane: no answer, left package 20462 Chalet Lane: left package with owner, but owner would not sign 20.476 Chalet Lane: left package with owner, but owner would not sign 20488 Chalet Lane: left package with owner, but owner would not sign 13761 Lexington Court: owner signed, notice attached 13784 Lexington Court: left package with owner, but owner would not sign 13785 Lexington Court: owner signed, notice attached 15862 Mina Way: no answer, left package 15858.Mina Way: left package with owner, but owner would not sign 15864 Mina Way: left package with owner, but owner would not sign • • 0 9 PROJECT ADDRESS Dear Neighbor, City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form !u c_ ti /''J•r I I�j1 / r c � l CITY OF SAl R:.^,l OGA r.•✓ i' +�l�i•JIT4•'.)EVErn.Nivl W I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. _ ,AA R f SH d Neighbor Name: ate: Signature: Neighbor Address: Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Date: Application Number: City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 Planning Department 0 City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: Dear Neighbor, � , #, � r � CITY OF AF.ATOGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1 am. proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by.each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408-868-1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. / Neighbor Name: L Date: -7 1 Z 3 Signature: Neighbor Address: Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name:. Date: Application Number: City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 7 • I ] • • City of Saratoga . Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: __Ji —VVk �� / Date: 3 Signatur Neighbor Zc. -t L-\ C G L14 kl. L- -` Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: 0 Application Number: Date: City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10129106 L ni OCT E L zLiu R 1 L� CITY or sa.R= T CcA COM6NITY DEVELOPMENT I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: __Ji —VVk �� / Date: 3 Signatur Neighbor Zc. -t L-\ C G L14 kl. L- -` Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: 0 Application Number: Date: City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10129106 City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: )I?S i3 � E>�F I; Dear Neighbor, U 2 3 2007 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1 am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide. you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans-for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Nam rAel1vC Date: D Signature: Neighbor Address: /.17L' _ Neighbor Phone MI (e 7`/ U If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please-attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Application Number: City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 Date: Planning Department • • 0 ATTACHMENT 4 • L� • MetroPCS • Proposed Base Station (Site No. SF18160B) 20455 Herriman Avenue • Saratoga, California Statement of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers The firm of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers, has been retained on behalf of MetroPCS, a personal wireless telecommunications carrier, to evaluate the base station (Site No. SF1816013) proposed to be located at 20455 Herriman Avenue in Saratoga, California, for compliance with appropriate guidelines limiting human exposure to radio frequency ( "RF ") electromagnetic fields. Prevailing Exposure Standards The .U.S. Congress requires that the Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC ") evaluate its actions for possible significant impact on the environment. In Docket 93 -62, effective October 15, 1997, the FCC adopted the human exposure limits for field strength and power density recommended in Report No. 86, "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields," published in 1986 by the Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements ( "NCRP "). Separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions, with the latter limits generally five times more restrictive. The more recent Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ( "IEEE ") Standard C95.1 -2005, "Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz," includes similar exposure limits. A summary of the -FCC's exposure limits is shown in Figure 1. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. The most restrictive FCC limit for exposures of unlimited duration to radio frequency energy for several personal wireless services are as follows: Personal Wireless Service Approx. Frequency Occupational Limit Public Limit Personal Communication ( "PCS ") 1,950 MHz 5.00 mW /cm2 1.00 mW /cm2 Cellular Telephone 870 2.90 0.58 Specialized Mobile Radio 855 2.85 0.57 . [most restrictive frequency range] .30-300 1.00 0.20 General Facility Requirements Base stations typically consist of two distinct parts: the electronic transceivers (also called. "radios" or "channels ") that are connected to the traditional wired telephone lines, and the passive antennas that send the wireless signals created by the radios. out to be received by individual subscriber units. The transceivers are often located at ground level and are connected to the antennas by coaxial cables about 1 inch thick. Because of the short wavelength of the frequencies assigned by the FCC for wireless services, the antennas require line -of -sight paths for their signals to propagate well and so are installed at some height above ground. The antennas are designed to concentrate their energy toward HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. MP18160596 CONSULTING ENGINEERS 'sue Page] of 3 SAN FRANCISCO �;2'c �1Rxa • • MetroPCS - Proposed Base Station (Site No. SF18160B) 20455 Herriman Avenue - Saratoga, California the horizon, with very little energy wasted toward the sky or the ground. Along with the low power of such facilities, this means that it is generally not possible for exposure conditions to approach the maximum permissible exposure limits without being physically very near the antennas. Computer Modeling Method The FCC provides direction for determining compliance in its Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65, ".Evaluating Compliance with FCC - Specified Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation," dated August 1997. Figure 2 attached describes the calculation methodologies, reflecting the facts that a directional antenna's radiation pattern is not fully formed at locations very close by (the "near- field" effect) and that at greater distances the power level from an energy source decreases with the square of the distance from it (the "inverse square law "). The conservative nature of this method for evaluating exposure conditions has been verified by numerous field tests. Site and Facility Description Based upon information provided by MetroPCS, including drawings by Michael Wilk Architecture, dated January 4, 2007, it is proposed to mount three Andrew Model 931DG70 -VTEM directional PCS antennas inside the cross atop the roof peak at the west face of the Saratoga Presbyterian Church, located at 20455 Herriman Avenue in Saratoga. The antennas would be mounted at an effective height of about 441/2 feet above ground, 2 feet above the roof, and would be oriented at 120° spacing, to provide service in all directions. The maximum effective radiated power in any direction would be 1,890 watts, representing six channels operating simultaneously at 315 watts each. There are reported no other wireless communications base stations installed nearby. Study Results For a person anywhere at ground, the maximum ambient RF exposure level due to the proposed Metro operation is calculated to be 0.0032 mW /cm2, which is 0.32% of the applicable public exposure limit. The maximum calculated level at the second -floor elevation of any nearby residence' is 0.15% of the applicable public exposure limit; the maximum calculated cumulative level at any nearby buildings is 1.3% of the public exposure limit. It should be noted that these results include several "worst- case" assumptions and therefore are expected to overstate actual power density levels. Power density levels may exceed the public limit in areas on the roof of the subject building near the antennas. ' Located at least 200 feet away, based on aerial photographs from Terraserver. t A taller structure located about 230 feet to the south, based on aerial photographs from Terraserver. HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO MP18160596 Page 2 of 3 MetroPCS • Proposed Base Station (Site No. SF18160B) 20455 Herriman Avenue • Saratoga, California Recommended Mitigation Measures Due to their mounting location, the Metro antennas are not accessible to the general public, and so no mitigation measures are necessary to comply with the FCC public exposure guidelines. To prevent occupational exposures in excess of the FCC guidelines, no access within 3 feet directly in front of the Metro antennas themselves, such as might occur during building maintenance work, should be allowed while the base station is in operation, unless other measures. can be demonstrated to ensure that occupational protection, requirements are met. Posting explanatory warning signs: at the base of the antenna enclosure; such that the signs would be readily visible from any angle of approach to persons who might need to work within that distance, would be sufficient to meet FCC - adopted guidelines. Conclusion Based on the information and analysis above, it is the undersigned's professional opinion that the base station proposed by MetroPCS at 20455 Herriman Avenue in Saratoga, California, will comply with the prevailing standards -for limiting public exposure to radio frequency energy and, therefore, will not for this reason cause a significant impact on the environment. The highest calculated level in publicly accessible areas is much less than the prevailing standards allow for exposures of unlimited duration. This finding is consistent with measurements of actual exposure conditions taken at other operating base stations. Posting of explanatory signs is recommended to establish compliance with occupational exposure limitations. Authorship The undersigned author of this statement is a qualified Professional Engineer, holding California Registration Nos. E -13026 and M- 20676, which expire on June 30, 2007. This work has been carried out by him or under his direction, and all statements are true and correct of his own knowledge except, where noted, when data has been supplied by others, which data he believes to be correct. 1p Q11:0 EI* CO oi 3� E -13026 ��- , - , t4*-.y C M -20678 William F.. Ham tt, P.E. E., 6.30-07 January 22, 2007 # ,9 FC 1C. CA��� $ ,Warning signs should comply with OET -65 color, symbol, and content recommendations.. Contact information should be provided (e.g., a telephone number) to arrange for access to restricted areas. The selection of language(s) is not an engineering matter, and guidance from the landlord, local zoning or health authority, or appropriate professionals may be required. S t.A <` HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. MP18160596 i A'! CONSULTING ENGINEERS nom:= _; .< ;_ SAN FRANCISCO Page 3 of 3 • • 0 FCC Radio Frequency Protection Guide The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Act) the Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC ") to adopt a nationwide human exposure standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a significant impact on the environment. The FCC adopted the limits from Report No. 86, "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields," published in 1986 by the Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, which are similar to the more recent Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Standard C95.1 -2005, "Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz." These limits apply for continuous exposures from all sources and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. As shown in the table and chart below, separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions, with the latter limits (in italics and /or dashed) up to five times more restrictive: Frequency— Applicable Range (MHz) 0.3– 1.34 1.34– 3.0 3.0– 30 30— 300 300— 1,500. 1,500— 100,000 1000 100 3 E. 10 c a° p E 1 0.1 Electromagnetic Fields (f is freauencv of emission in MHz Electric Magnetic Equivalent Far -Field Field Strength Field Strength Power Density (V /m) (A /m) (m W /cm2) 614 614 1.63 1.63 100 100 614 823.81f 1.63 2.191f 100 18011 1842/ f 823.81f 4.89/ f 2.191f 900 / f 18011 61.4 27.5 0.163 0.0729 1.0 0.2 3.54ff 1.59ff ff /106 ff/238 f/300 f /1500 137 61.4 0.364 0.163 5.0 1.0 Occupational Exposure PCs Public Exposure FM Cell i 0.1 1 10 100 103 104 105 Frequency (MHz) Higher levels are allowed for short periods of time, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or thirty minutes, for occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits, and higher levels also are allowed for exposures to small areas, such that the spatially averaged levels do not exceed the limits. However, neither of these allowances is incorporated in the conservative calculation formulas in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) for projecting field levels. Hammett & Edison has built those formulas into a proprietary program that calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density from any number of individual radio sources. The program allows for the description of buildings and uneven terrain, if required to obtain more accurate projections. HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO FCC Guidelines Figure 1 RFR.CALC rM Calculation Methodology Assessment by Calculation of Compliance with FCC. Exposure Guidelines The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Act) the Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC ") to adopt a nationwide human exposure standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a significant impact on the environment. The maximum permissible exposure limits adopted by the FCC (see Figure 1) apply for continuous exposures from all sources and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. Higher levels are allowed for short periods of time, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or thirty minutes, for occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits. Near Field. Prediction methods have been developed for the near field zone of panel (directional) and whip (omnidirectional) antennas, typical at:wireless telecommunications cell sites. The near field zone is defined by the distance, D, from an ,-antenna beyond. which the manufacturer's published, far field antenna patterns will be fully formed; the near field may exist for increasing D until some or all of three conditions have been met: • 2 1) D > 2) D >5h 3) D> 1.6;\ where h aperture height of the antenna, in meters, and = wavelength of the transmitted signal, in meters. The FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No.. 65 (August 1997) gives this formula for calculating power density in the near field zone about an individual RF source: power density S = 1g W 0.1 x P x n x D xnh ° in mW /cm2, where OBW = half -power beamwidth of antenna, in degrees, and Pnet = ' net power input to the antenna, in watts. The factor of 0.1 in the numerator converts to the desired units of power density. This formula has been built into a proprietary program that calculates distances to FCC public and occupational limits. Far Field. OET 65 gives this formula for calculating power density in the far field of an individual RF source: 2.56 x 1.64 x 100 x RFF2 x ERP power density S = in mW /cm2, 4x n x D 2 where ERP = total ERP (all polarizations), in kilowatts, RFF = relative field factor at the direction to the actual point of calculation, and D = distance from the center of radiation to the point of calculation, in meters. The factor. of 2.56 accounts for the increase in power density due to ground reflection, assuming a reflection coefficient of 1.6 (1.6 x 1.6 = 2.56). The factor of 1.64 is the gain of a half -wave dipole relative to an isotropic radiator. The factor of 100 in the numerator converts to the desired units of power density. This formula has been built into a proprietary program that calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density from any number of individual radiation sources. The program also allows for the description of uneven terrain in the vicinity, to obtain more.accurate projections. t ;07 HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. Methodology i 1 = CONSULTING ENGINEERS Figure 2 a+ �:, eLIRUZ SAN FRANCISCO • � ATTACHMENT 5 • i Community. Development Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, California 95070 20455 Herriman Avenue ARBORIST REPORT APN 393 -41 -032 Owner: 'Saratoga Presbyterian Church INTRODUCTION • Application #: 07 -253 October 23, 2007 Prepared by Kate Bear, City Arborist Phone (408) 868 -1276 I i MetroPCS has submitted plans to the city to install a cell phone tower concealed in a cross at the Saratoga Presbyterian Church located at 20455 Herriman Avenue. Three trees protected by-City ordinance and potentially impacted by construction were inventoried for this report. Data for each tree is included in a Tree Inventory Table, at the end of this report. Tree locations are marked on the attached copy of the Site Plan. Plans reviewed for this report include Sheets T- 1,.T -2, T -3 and Sheets A -1, A -2, A -3 and A -4, by Michael Wilk Architecture dated May 2, 2007, and Sheet LS -1, Survey, dated December 18, 2006 by MetroPCS. SITE OBSER NATIONS PLAN REVIEW AND .TECHNICAL DISCUSSION Three American sweetgums (Liquidambar styraciflua) trees are potentially impacted by construction. They can be adequately protected during construction if they are fenced off and the location for the conduit is `constructed as detailed below. The plans specify that installation of the conduit for the cell phone tower will be bored within a five foot easement. The plans do not, specify the depth of the bore hole. It is acceptable to bore underneath the protected trees as long as the bore hole is at least two feet below grade. Entry and exit holes may be dug, to the bore holes following the recommendations listed below. No trenching should occur under the canopies of the protected trees. If trenching occurs to install the conduit, trees #2 and #3 will be significantly impacted and considered a loss. If trenching is required to install the conduit, an alternate path can be provided that will not. compromise the two trees. Per City Ordinance 15- 50.080, a bond in the amount of $19,080, which is equal to 100% of the total appraised value of trees #1 — 3, is required. Once the design has been finalized, a bond amount will be determined. Appraisal values are calculated according to the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9`h Edition, published by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), 2000. REQUIREMENTS 1. This entire report, including the Tree Inventory Table and map showing locations of trees and protective fencing, shall be incorporated into the set of final building plans. Page 1 of 2 • 20455 Herriman Avenue 2. Tree protective fencing shall be installed as shown on the attached map and established prior to any grading or the arrival of construction equipment or materials on site. It shall be comprised of six -foot high chain link fencing mounted on eight -foot tall, two -inch diameter galvanized posts, driven 24 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. Tree protective fencing shall be inspected and approved by the City Arborist prior to obtaining building division permits. 3. Owner shall provide a tree protection bond in the amount of $19,080, prior to obtaining building division permits. The bond shall remain in place for the duration of the construction project to ensure the protection of the trees. Once the project has been completed and inspected by the City Arborist, the bond can be released. 4. It is acceptable to bore underneath the protected trees to install the conduit. The bore hole shall be at least two feet below grade. Entry and exit holes shall be hand dug for the first 18 inches. If a root measuring two inches or larger is found, the hole shall be relocated to avoid the root. Roots measuring less than two inches maybe cut using a sharp pruning tool. An auger maybe used to drill the depth of the entry and exit holes for the depth below 18 inches. 5. Any pruning of trees on site must be performed under the supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. disposal of harmful products, including but not limited to chemicals, paint rinse water, fuel, 6. The disp P cement rinse water, herbicides, or other materials, is prohibited beneath tree canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath tree canopies. Attachments: Tree Bond Form Tree Inventory Table Map Showing Tree Protective Fencing Locations • Page 2 of 2 IREE INVENTORY TABLE October 23, 2007 20455 Herriman 10 ^'a Co 1� ,3 0 r, c �, w v 3 �c 3 w 2 0 Q c c p II U 2:' 0 0 48 b„ TREE .. " N > °° w II to U a C,0 0 e C3 a NO. „ TREE NAME r c7 w x .n / .fl O �n x A z a ¢ American Sweetgum 1 Li uidambar s raci ua 18 30 80 80 Good High 2 $6,300 American Sweetgum 2 Li uidambars raci ua 23 35 90 80 Good High 2 $10,900 American Sweetgum 3 Li uidambar styraciflua 10.5 20 80 70 Good Hi h 1 $1;880 $19,080 Total Appraised Value Replacement Tree Values 15 gallon = $150 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 48 inch box = $5,000 52 inch box .7 7,000 72 inch box =. $15,000 Should any tree listed above become damaged owner will be required to repair the damage. Should any tree listed above be removed owner will be required to replace that tree with trees equal in value to its assessed value. October 23, 2007 20455 Herriman . 0 (E) •/C PMKNG • • 20455 Herriman Avenue LEGEND Tree Protective Fencing Tree Canopy ATTACHMENT 6 � • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, Denise Kaspar , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the 21St day of November , 2007, that I deposited 93 notices in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to -wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15- 45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property described as: Address: 20455 Herriman AP N : 393 -41 -032 that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. rb ff enise Kaspar Advanced Listing Services • lovember 20, 2007 ;00' Ownership Listing 'repared for: ;93-41 -032 'RESBYTERY OF SAN JOSE THE SARAT ;0455 HERRIMAN AVE ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -4901 .93 -41 -001 ;LIFTON M & MADELYN LIPFORD )R CURRENT OWNER .0499 CHALET LN ARATOGA CA 95070 -4928 93 -41 -004 IYOK Y & HEE KWON )R CURRENT OWNER 0467 CHALET LN : ARATOGA CA 95070 -4928 93 -41 -007 fICTOR TSAI 3772 LEXINGTON CT ARATOGA CA 95070 -4933 93 -41 -010 . IEMANTH RAVI )R CURRENT OWNER 0374 CHALET LN ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -4961 93 -41 -013 VAN PAVLINA )R CURRENT OWNER .0373 CHALET LN ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -4926 93 -4.1 -016 'APKEN S & CLARA DERTOROSSIAN )R CURRENT OWNER 0393 CHALET LN : ARATOGA CA 95070 -4926 93 -41 -019 :ENDRA L CHUN )R CURRENT OWNER .0421 CHALET LN ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -4926. 93 -41 -022 ?DWARD C & JEHEE CHANG )R CURRENT OWNER 0454 CHALET LN , ARATOGA CA 95070 -4929 393 -41 -002 KUANG -YU & MEIYING CHEN OR CURRENT OWNER 20489 CHALET LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4928 393 -41 -005 HARVEY B & CONXTANCE FOX OR CURRENT OWNER 20455 CHALET LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4928 393 -41 -008 BRUCE D & CONSTANCE MITCHELL OR CURRENT OWNER 20400 CHALET LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4927 393 -41 -011 HYUN K & CHOON BACK OR CURRENT OWNER 20361 CHALET LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4964 393 -41 -003 RAJ & LAKSHMI CHERABUDDI OR CURRENT OWNER 20475 CHALET LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4928 393 -41 -006 DEVINDER KUMAR OR CURRENT OWNER 20424 CHALET LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4927 393 -41 -009 BADRINARAYANAN RAMASWAMY OR CURRENT OWNER 20386 CHALET LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4927 393 -41 -012 WILLIAM C & BONNIE KLETT OR CURRENT OWNER 20369 CHALET LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4926 393 -41 -014 393 -41 -015 KAZUHIKO. & JEANNIE NAKAMURA LOOH & ELAINE TING OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 20381 CHALET LN 20389 CHALET LN SARATOGA"CA 95070 -4926 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4926 393 -41 -017 ROBERT P & KAREN PIPER 2101 GOLD STRIKE RD SAN ANDREAS CA 95249 -9462 393 -41 -020 JAMES R & GAIL CARATOZZOLO OR CURRENT OWNER 20435 CHALET LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4926 393 -41 -023 FREDERICK S & GLADYS ARMSTRONG . OR CURRENT OWNER 20462 CHALET LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4929 393 -41 -018 RAJESH M & GEETHA BHAKTA OR CURRENT OWNER 20413 CHALET LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4926 393 -41 -021 LIMIN HE 16101 GREENWOOD RD MONTE SERENO CA 95030 -3019 ENK 393-41-024 VENK ATRAMAN OR CURRENT OWNER 20476. CHALET LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4929 ;93 -41 -025 VEI -AN W & MENG -FEN HUANG )R CURRENT OWNER CHALET IN TOGA CA 95070 -4929 ;93 -41 -028 'HRISTIAN K & ROBIN APPLE )R CURRENT OWNER 3749 LEXINGTON CT ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -4934 ,93 -41 -031 :AMESH K GOPI )R CURRENT OWNER 3785 LEXINGTON CT ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -4934 93 -42 -011 ;ANG H LEE )R CURRENT OWNER 3730 CALLE TACUBA ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -4919 93 -42 -036 :LAUS & MARIA JAEGER )R CURRENT OWNER 3685 CALLE TACUBA TOGA CA 95070 -4918 - 2 -039 ;ATHLEEN J VOGT )R CURRENT OWNER 3715 CALLE TACUBA �ARATOGA CA 95070 -4918 93 -42 -042 ARVNANDAN S & NAMITA SOIN )R CURRENT OWNER 3745 CALLE TACUBA . ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -4918 93 -42 -055 'EH -TAI YU )R CURRENT OWNER 0345 HERRIMAN AVE ARATOGA CA 95070 -4905 93 -42 -058 :ADHAKRISHNA & TARA .NABATHULA )R CURRENT OWNER 3760 LEXINGTON CT ARATOGA CA 95070 -4933 393 -41 -026 393 -41 -027 MURALI B & ANJALI SUBBARAO SHIRLEE B WALKER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 13725 LEXINGTON CT 13737 LEXINGTON CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -4934 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4934 393 -41 -029 393 -41 -030 LANE C TRONSON ABHIJIT & QEUNTINE ACHARYA OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 13761 LEXINGTON CT 13773 LEXINGTON CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -4934 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4934 393 -41 -032 393 -42 -010 PRESBYTERY OF SAN JOSE THE SARAT RICHARD DRUMM OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 20455 HERRIMAN AVE 13754 CALLE TACUBA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4901 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4921 393 -42 -018 PATRICIA KHAN OR CURRENT OWNER 13710 CALLE TACUBA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4919 393 -42 -037 CHING -PING CHOU OR CURRENT OWNER 13695 CALLE TACUBA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4918 393 -42 -040 SHU K LAI OR CURRENT OWNER 13725 CALLE TACUBA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4918 393 -42 -043 DENNIS T & TRACY NAMIMATSU OR CURRENT OWNER 13755 CALLE TACUBA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4920 393 -42 -056 YUE & LILI SUN OR CURRENT OWNER 13784 LEXINGTON CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -4933 393 -42 -059 LUNG -CHUN & CHAO -YI LIU OR CURRENT OWNER 13748 LEXINGTON CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -4933 393 -42 -019 HERBERT & JANICE LA MOTTE OR CURRENT OWNER 13700 CALLE TACUBA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4919 393 -42 -038 HUI -LIN CHEN OR CURRENT OWNER 13705 CALLE TACUBA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4918 393 -42 -041 JOHN E & SANDRA SEIBERT OR CURRENT OWNER 13735 CALLE TACUBA SARATOGA CA 95070 -4918 393 -42 -053 PETRUS HANDOKO OR CURRENT OWNER 20289 HERRIMAN AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4905 393 -42 -057 LEE - CHUNG & LEE -WEN TSAI OR CURRENT OWNER 13772 LEXINGTON CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -4933 393 -42 -060 CORA R HENDERSON PO BOX 2536 SARATOGA CA 95070 -0536 W 061 393 -42 -062 393 -42 -063 HENG BRIAN BERG SHEU FAMILY TRUST )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 3724 LEXINGTON CT 13712 LEXINGTON CT 13700 LEXINGTON CT ARATOGA CA 95070 -4933 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4933 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4933 ;93 -42 -064 >HMUEL NEHAMA )R CURRENT OWNER . .3688 LEXINGTON CT ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -4933 ;93 -42 -067 ;HENG -LI SHIH )R CURRENT OWNER '0315 HERRIMAN AVE ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -4905 �03 -20 -009 OHN H & MARIAN THEIN )R CURRENT OWNER 3643 SARATOGA SUNNYVALE RD ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -4833 03 -20 -059 )ANIEL A & ROLLY DUPREE )R CURRENT OWNER 0537 VERDE VISTA LN ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -4857 03 -21 -016 ERRY K CHAN )R CURRENT OWNER 0564 VERDE CT ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -4837 03 -21 -019 ►BOLGHASSEM & PARIDO 1EHAWANDIAN . )R CURRENT OWNER 3773 PRUNE BLOSSOM DR ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -4832 03 -21 -022 'RABAKAR SUNDARRAJAN )R CURRENT OWNER 5858 MINA WAY ARATOGA CA 95070 -5387 03 -21 -025 'EDDY KIANG )R CURRENT OWNER 2010 MAGNOLIA CT ARATOGA CA 95070 -5386 03 -21 -030 'U -TING & TE -FANG CHENG )R CURRENT OWNER 5871 MINA WAY ARATOGA CA 95070 -5389 393 -42 -065 MITSUE RAMOS OR CURRENT OWNER 13676 LEXINGTON CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -4933 393 -42 -068 GARY G & PAMELA CHANG OR CURRENT OWNER 20325 HERRIMAN AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4905 503 -20 -010 MARK EVANS OR CURRENT OWNER 13651 SARATOGA SUNNYVALE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -4833 503 -20 -060 SALLY WEBSTER OR CURRENT OWNER 20565 VERDE VISTA LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4857 503 -21 -017 MEIYING FORNEY 2233 PARAGON DR SAN JOSE CA 95131 -1337 503 -21 -020 THEODORE & LILLIE SMITH OR CURRENT OWNER 13772 PRUNE BLOSSOM DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4832 503 -21 -023 SCOTT R WHITMAN OR CURRENT OWNER 15862 MINA WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -5387 503 -21 -026 BAHRAM & FATEMEH NAVID OR CURRENT OWNER 12020 MAGNOLIA CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -5386 503 -21 -031 BONNIE MIDDLEBROOK . OR CURRENT OWNER 15867 MINA WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -5389 393 -42 -066 BILL LEUNG OR CURRENT OWNER 13654 LEXINGTON CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -4933 397 -29 -012 H LOS. GATOS 17421 Farley Road West LOS GATOS CA 95030 503 -20 -011 JEN -EAN LIN OR CURRENT OWNER 13671 SARATOGA SUNNYVALE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -4833 503 -20 -087 GERARDO A & NILDA RETAMOSO 19430 VINEYARD LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4547 503 -21 -018 BONNIE YOSHIKAWA 110 TAIT AVE LOS GATOS CA 95030 -5937 503 -21 -021 LIA LORTON OR CURRENT OWNER 13750 PRUNE BLOSSOM DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4832 503 -21 -024 . TSONG LEE OR CURRENT OWNER 15866 MINA WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -5387 503 -21 -028 LIANGJIE XU OR CURRENT OWNER 12011 MAGNOLIA CT. SARATOGA CA 95070 -5386 503 -21 -032 RUSSELL 1998 OR CURRENT OWNER 18580 PETUNIA CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -5390 03 -21 -033 503 -21 -034 503 -21 -035 1ARK & ANNETTE SIECZKAREK DEAN J & JULIE ROSITANO PATRICIA R POLLACK )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 8588 PETUNIA CT 18581 PETUNIA CT 15863 MINA WAY ARATOGA CA 95070 -5390 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5390 SARATOGA -CA 95070 -5388 • C7 X03 -21 -036 ✓ 0HAMMAD S & DIANE NASSER )R CURRENT OWNER MINA WAY .TOGA CA 95070 -5388 '103 -52 -019 :HIA -PU CHANG )R CURRENT OWNER :0520 DEERPARK CT ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -5308 ;03 -52 -022 AARY J LEVIS )R CURRENT OWNER D557 DEERPARK CT ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -5308 • 503 -52 -017 JACK D & NANCY NICHOLS OR CURRENT OWNER 13888 LYNDE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -5311 503 -52 -020 DEAN B & ETHEL JAMES OR CURRENT OWNER 20518 DEERPARK CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -5308 CITY OF SARATOGA ATTN: THERESE SCHMIDT 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE SARATOGA CA 95070 503 -52 -018 PAKKIRISAMY & VETRI RAJAMANICKAM OR CURRENT OWNER 20532 DEERPARK CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -5308 503 -52 -021 GRACE Y LUI OR CURRENT OWNER 20531 DEERPARK CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -5308 Advanced Listing Services P.O. Box 2593 Dana Point CA 92624 LegalAdvertisingbGeNotices ing certain very important `,.,_; actions, however the pee f, General sonar representative will he eteres ro else notice to Notices Interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed ORDER TO SNOW OUSE aclian.) The independent ODERTOSOF NAME administration authority will CASE NO. 107CV097666 be granted unless an inter SUPERIOR COURT Of ULI- listed person files an objet• FORMA. COUNTY OF SANTA shows to the Petition and CLARA, 191 NORTH FIRST shows good cause why the STREET, SAN JOSE, U 95113 court should not grant the IN THE MATTER OF THE PETI- authority. A HEARING on the petition TION OF MICHAEL I. LEVY & Will be held an DECEMBER 5, GINA LEVY - 2007, 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 15 THE COURT RHOS that located at 191 9511 ,First 5l.. Petitioners) MICHAEL I. San lase, U 951U. LEVY & GINA L. LEVY If YOU OBJECT to the granti- has /have filed for a decree ng of the petition, you hanging names) as for• should appear at the hearing tows: and state your ablections Present name: or tile written objections ANNE MARY LEVY with the court before the PhoP itn ��, hearing. Your appearance 1TTHHA4ERCOURT ORDERS that all maybe in person of by Yaur attorney. persons interested in this a YOU ARE t CREDITOR credit. or mailer shall appear before a contingent creditor of This court at the hearing the deceased, you must indicated below to show file your claim with the court cause, if any, why the Pell- and mail a copy to the lion for change of name personal representative Should not he granted. appointed by the court with. Halite of Hearing on DECEM• in four months from the date BER 31, 2007 at 8:45 a.m. in of first issuance of letters ROOM 107 located at 191 as provided in section North First Street, San lase, 9100 or the California U 95113.. Probate Code. A COPY of this order to show The time for filing claims e shall be published at will not expire before four least once each week for months from the hearing four successive weeks prior date noticed above. to the date set for hearing on YOU MAY EXAMINE the file Ile petition in the following kept by Me court. If you newspaper of general cinu- are a person interested lotion. SARATOGA NEWS, in. the estate, Yau may Ole printed in the County of with the court a formal Santa Clara. Request for Special Nolite Dated: OCTOBER 29.2007 of the fili . of an inventory /Mary d of the So erior Court and appraisal of 'stale R P assets or of any petition or 1112 SN 11/7, 11 114, 11121, ac mum as 11128) in sec. 17 /zej Lion 1250 f the California NOTICEOFPETITIONTO Probate Code. A Request ADMINISTER ESTATE OF for Special Notice form is ALFRED JOSEPH MERNONE available from the court USE NO. 1-01-PR-161970 clerk. To all heirs- beneficiaries, Attorney for petitioner: creditors, contingent credi. MATTHEW A. CROSBY tars, and persons who may 7785 PARK AVENUE otherwise be interested in SANTA CLARA. CA 95050 the wIU or estate, or bath 403.370 -7500 of ALFRED JOSEPH MER. (Pub SN 11 /14.11/21,11/28) NONE, aka ALFRED J. MER• NONE �' City PETITION filed by KEVIN -� KEVIN MERNONE AND GLENN - MERNONE In the Legals Superior Court of California, County of Santa Ctarar THE PETITION requests that NOTICE Of NEARING KEVIN MERNONE AND BEFORE PUNNING GLENN MERNONE be COMMISSION .,pointed as personal repre• CRT OF SARATOGA'S sentative to administer the PLANNING COMMISSION estate of the decedent. announces the following THE PETITION requests the public hearings on decedents WILL and cadi- Wednesday. the 12th day n tits, if any, be admitted to December at the 3yy.m.inthe probate. The will and any [i Council Uambers local- at are available for lid at 13777 Frultvate examination in the file kept Avenue, Saratoga, CA by the court 95070. Details and plans THE PETITION requests are available at the Saratoga authority estate to administer Community Development the estate under the De ...men., Monday Independent Administration through Thursday, 7:30 a.m. ofEstales Ad. (This author- -S:OO p.m. lfyau have gun. ity will allow the persanal Lions, Planners are available representatve to lake many at the public counter actions without obtaining between hours of 7:30 court approval. Before risk• a.m. and 12:00 noon. proposed floor area will be Map and Use Permit All interested persons may approximately 6,088 square approvals granted by the appear and be heard at the Feet. The maximum height of Planning Commission on above time and place. Ifyou the proposed building will October 27, 2004. The challenge a decision of the not 'need the 26-foot Tentative Map and Use Planning Commission put• height limit. The maximum Permit approvals expired 24 suant to a public hearing in impervious coverage will not months L. this date. The court, you may be limited to exceed the allowable 35% of applicant was granted a one raising only those issues you the net site area. The lot she year extension of the or someone else raised at is approximately 45.564 Tentative Map and Use the puhlic hearing(s) square feel, end the site is Permit approvals on October described in this notice, or in located in the R•1. 40,000 25. 2006. This one year written correspondence zoning district, Design extension has expired. The delivered to the Saratoga Review approval is required 24 month extension will Planning Commission at, or pursuant to Saratoga expire on October 27, 2009. prim lo, the public hearing. Municipal Cade Section I5• The applicant was granted In order to be included in 45.060. Tentative Map and Use the Planning Commission's APPLICATION# 07.253 Permit approvals to subdi- Information packets, written (393.41 -032) vide a 29.28,11¢ property I ommunications should be Metro PCS. into five clustered lots with filed on or before the 20455 Herriman Avenue • an avenge lot size of 1.73 Tuesday, a week before the The applicant is requesting acres. The remaining 19.49• meeting. Conditional Use Permit acre portion of the Property A site visit will be held on approval to locale a wireless is to remain in open space the day preceding the hear - facility at the Presbyterian with a pedestrian, equestri- ing date listed above as part Church on Herriman at an trail winding through the of the standard Site Visit Saratoga Avenue. The pre, open space. Access to the Committee agenda. Site vis• ject consists of a new cross property Is to be via a cul- ItS occur between 3:30 and structure with concealed de -sac, which egresses onto 5:00 p.m. The site visit is antennas and a new equip. Mount Eden Road. An emer- pen to the public The Site ment cabinet screened by Remy access road Is pro - Ws it Committee will convene existing landscape. The lot posed from Vista Regina at the City Hall parking lot at size is 4.22 acres and the Road to the cul. desec. The 3:30 p.m. on the day preced- site is zoned R -1- 12,500. property has a General Plan ing the hearing and visit the APPLICATION# it of RHC - Hillside site listed above and may PDR07 -0011 Conservation and is zoned visit other sties as well. For (386.43 -006) HR - Hillside Residential more information please Yonglian Wang; 19278 District. contact the Community Bellwood Orin: - The appli. (Pub SN 11/28) Development Department at cant reynest Design Review — 408 868.1222 or review the approval to remove an exist - Site Visit Agenda on the ing 859 square foot second �J' Trustee City Website at www.sarato. story of an existing two - ga.ca.us. story single-family residence Sales APPLICATION# and replace it with a new PDR07 -003 859 square foot second (397 -05 -042) story addition in approxi• Pilzen, 1441601dwood Road matey the same location. NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE The applicant requests The residence will not TRUSTEE SALE Design Review appie"t to exceed 26 feet in height. NO. 201-052008 add second floor to the The net lot size is 14.712 LOAN NO. existi ng single story iesi- square feet. The site is TITLE ORDER NO. 060323 dente. The addition zoned R•1.12.500. D3391297 includes approximately 298 APPLICATION# YOU ARE IN DEFAULT square feet to the existing EXT07.11111 UNDER A DEED OF TRUST first floor and a new, approx- (50343 -067) DATED 4.3.2006. UNLESS !merely, 1,157 square fool Br— ItUrHo; Mi. Eden Rd. YOU TAKE ACTION To PRO' second -story to the existing south of Villa Oaks Lane — TECT YOUR PROPERTY, IT 4,633 square foot single. The applican requests a 24 MAY BE SOLD AT A PUBLIC story residence. The total month extension of Teale in SALE. IF YOU NEED AN Important Information: No refunds after submission. C.snoeled ads will receive credit for future advertising, not a refund. Ads must be canceled before deadline for that issue. Advertisements are accepted upon the representation that the advertiser and/or its agency have the right to publish the contents thereof, In con- sideration of such publication, advertiser and its agency agree to indemni- fy and hold the publisher harmless against aqy expense or loss by reason of any claims arising out of publication. The publisher reserves the right . to edit, alter, omit, or refuse any advertising submitted. For policies concerning specific categories, please refer to the paragraph at the b ginning of the category or call us at 408.200.1025 . or email us at cl=ifhods @community- newspapers.com. S,icon Valley Community Newspapers accepts no liability for its failure, for any caztse, to insert an advertisement. Liability for any error appearing in an adver. tisement is limited to the cost of the space actually occupied. No allowance, however, will be granted for an error that does not materially affect the value of the advertise• ment. To qualify for an adjustment, any error must be reported within 15 days of publication date. Credit for errors is limited to first insertion. • • • • • EXPLANATION OF THE conveyed to and now held by INFORMATION, CLARA County, California, for the total amount (at the FOR THAT PURPOSE. SAN JOSE, CA at public auc. or federal savings and loan NATURE OF THE PROCEED- the trustee in the hereinafter PLEASE CALL 714359.7850 executed by: HOMER time of the initial publication ASAP#933600 lion, to the highest bidder association, savings associa- INGS AGAINST YOU. YOU described properly under websile: BRYANT AND ANNETTE LYNN of the Notice of Sale) reason. (Pub SN 11/21, 11128, 12/ 5) for ash or check as Him, or sum s bank speci. SHOULD CONTACT A and pursuant to the Deed of www.fidelilyasap.com BRYANT, HUSBAND AND ably estimated to be set NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE described below, payable in tied in Section 5102 of the LAWYER. Trust. The sale will be made, PLM LENDER SERVICES, WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS, as forth below. The amount full at time of sale, all Financial Code and autho- On12.12.2007.atI1:00A.M., but without covenant .1 a,- INC., As Trustee Trustar, KELLEY YANES, may be greater on the day of TS N0.07.35812 right, title, and interest rized to do business in this PLM LENDER SERVICES, INC. ranty, expressed or implied, (408)•370 -4030 TRUSTEE OF THE KELLEY sale. Place of Sale: AT THE DOC ID . conveyed to and now held p t0009g0285612005N stale. Said sale will be as the duly appointed regarding title, possession, ELIZABETH GODBEY, YANES REVOCABLE TRUST, NORTH MARKET STREET by it under said Deed of TITLE ORDER made, in an "AS IS" condk Trustee under and pursuant or encumbrances, to pay the VICE PRESIDENT AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 48.0% ENTRANCE TO THE COUNTY Trust, in the property siluat. to Deed of Trust Recorded remaining principal sum of PLM LENDER SERVICES, INC. INTERESTAND FIRST BLACK- COURTHOUSE, 190 NORTH NO BG722542 ed in said Coun ty and Slate lion, but without covenant or 04.06.2006, Book , Page . [lie nole(s) secured by the IS A DEBT COLLECTOR HAWK FINANCIAL CORP., AS MARKET STREET, SAN JOSE, INVESTOR /INSURER and as more fully described warranty, express or implied, Instrument 18875734 of offs- Deed of Trust, interest there- ATTEMPTING TO COLLECT A TO AN UNDIVIDED 52.0% CA Amount of unpaid bah N0.0940R8561 in the above referenced regarding title, possession DEBT. ANY INFORMATION APN NO.389- 13.037 satisfy cial records in the Office of on. estimated fees, charges INTEREST, as Beneficiary, arxe and other charges: YOU ARE IN DEFAULT Deed at Trust. The street or encumbrances, to saris the Recorder of SANTA and expenses of the Trustee OBTAINED WILL BE USED will sell at public auction $711.246.13(esti mated) UNDER A DEED OF TRUST, address and other common the indebtedness secured by CLARA County. California, for the total amount (at the FOR THAT PURPOSE. sale to the highest bidder for Street address and other GATED 6/14/2005. UNLESS designation, if envy: of the said Deed of Trust, advances ecuted . by: HOMER lime of the initial publication #933599 cash, cashieis check drawn common designation of the real property described thereunder, with interest as BRYANT AND ANNETTE LYNN of the Notice of Sale) reason- (Pub SN 11/21, 11/28,11/5) b a state or national bank, a real pro er YOU TAKE ACTION TO PRO• p provided, and the unpaid y p ty purported as: TECT YOUR PROPERTY, IT above Is unparted to be: BRYANT, HUSBAND AND abty estimated to be set NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE cashieYS check dawn by a 14215 WORDEN WAY MAY BE SOLD ATA PUBLIC 18580 PASEO LADO, principal of the Note secured WIFE, AS IOINT TENANTS. forth below. The amount TRUSTEE SALE stale or federal credit union, SARATOGA, CA 95070 APN SALE. IF YOU NEED pN SARATOGA, CA, 95070. The by said Deed of Trust with as Trustor, KELLEY YANES may be greater on the day of NO. 201452007 0 acashier's check drawn by Number: 397 -26 -047 The E %PLANATION OF THE undersigned Trustee the interest thereon as provided REVOCABLE TRUST. AS sale. Place of Sale: AT THE LOAN N0. ar state or federal savings undersigned Trustee dis. NATURE OF THE PROCEED- claims any liability for any in said Note, plus fees, TO AN UNDIVIDED NORTH MARKET STREET TITLE 0R0ER NO. .and loan association, sav- claims any liability for any LNG AGAINST YOU, YOU i rreclness of the street charges and expenses of the 53.33333333% INTEREST ENTRANCE TO THE COUNTY 060324D3391352 mgr auocialton, or savings imm�eetness Of the street SHOULD CONTACT A address and other common Trusteeandofthetruslscm- AND FIRST SLACKHAWK CO URTHOUSE, 190 NORTH y0U ARE IN DEFAULT bank specified in section address and other common LAWYER. designation, if any, shown ated said Deed of Trust. FINANCIAL CORP.. AS TO AN MARKET STREET. SAN LOSE, UNDER p DEED OF TRUST 5102 of the Financial Code designation, if any, shown Notice is hereby given that herein. The total amount of DATED: 11/18/1007 UNDIVIDED 46.66666667% CA Amount of .unpaid bal. DATED 4.03.2006. UNLESS and authorized to d0 bust. herein. The property hereto -' RE[ONTRUST COMPANY, the unpaid balance w'th INTEREST, as Beneficiary, once and other charges: YOU TAKE ACTION TO PRO- Hess in this slate. Sale will fore described is being sold N.A., as duly appointed' Interest thereon of the RECONTRUST COMPANY, will sell at public coon f 775,062.66(estimaled) TECT YOUR PROPERTY, IT be held by the duly appoint. "as is ". trustee pursuant to the obligation secured by the NA sale to the highest bidder for Street address and other MAY BE SOLD AT A PUBLIC ed trustee as shown below, DATE: 11- 08.2007 Deed of Trust executed by properly to be 'a fit plus rem- 1757 TAPO CANYON ROAD, C ash, cashier's check drawn common designation of the SALE. IF YOU NEED AN of all right, title, and interest FOR TRUSTEE'S SALES XUAN PHAM, A MARRIED scom Is estimated costs, SVW88 SIMI VALLEY, CA by a state or national bank, a real property purported as: EXPLANATION OF THE conveyed to and now held by INFORMATION, WOMAN, AS HER SOLE AND expenses nd advances 93063 cashier's check dawn by a 14201 WORDEN WAY NATURE OF THE PROCEED- the trustee in the hereinafter PLEASE CALL 714 -259 -7850 SEPARATE PROPERTY , dated at the time Of the initial pub- Phone: (800) 2818219, state or federal credit union. SARATOGA, CA 95070 APN INGS AGAINST YOU, YOU described property under Websile: 06/24/2005 and recorded Italian of the NoUCe of Sale Sale Information or acroshier'scheck drawn by Number: 397 - 26.046 The SHOULD CONTACT A and pursuant to the Deed of www.fidel'dyazap.com 06/30/05, as Instrument is 5759,799A5. (805)578.6618 a slate or federal savings undersigned Trustee dis - UIWYER. Trust. the sale will be made, PlM LENDER SERVICES, No. 18467319,m BOOk, Page It rs possible [hat al the By: Trustee's Sale Ofltcer and loan association, sav- claims any liability for any On t2- 12 -20W a131 :00 AM., but without covenant or war- INC, As Trustee I. f ORictat Records in the lime of sale the opening RECONTRUST COMPANY, ings association, or savings incorrectness of the street PLM LENDER SERVICES. INC. ranty, expressed or implied, (408)•370.4030 office Of the County Recorder bid may be less than the N.A. is a debt collector bank pecihed in section address and Other common s the duly ppoinled regarding title, possession, ELIZABETH GODOEY, of Santa Clara County, total indebtedness due. In 5102 of the Financial Code designation, if any, shown Trustee antler and pursuant or encumbrances, to paV the VICE PRESIDENT Slate of California, will sell addition to cash, the Trustee attempting to collect a debt. and authorized to do busi. herein. The property hereto• to Deed of Trust Recorded remaining principal sum of PLM LENDER SERVICES, INC. on 12/11/2007 at 11:00AM, will accept cashier's checks Any information obtained Hess in this state. Sale will fore described is being sold 04.06 -2006. Book . Page , the notes) secured by the IS A DEBT COLLECTOR AT THE NORTH MARKET drawn on a state or national will be used for that pur- he held by the duly appoint. "as is ". Instrument 18875736. of Deed of Trust, interest there. ATTEMPTING TO COLLECT A STREET ENTRANCE TO THE bank, a check drawn by a pose. ed trustee as shown below, DATE: 11.08.2007 official records in the Office on, estimated tees, charges DEBT. ANY INFORMATION COUNTY COURTHOUSE, 190 stale or federal credit union, ASAP#9294" at all right, title, and interest FOR TRUSTEE'S SALES of the Recorder of SANTA and expenses of the Trustee OBTAINED WILL BE USED NORTH MARKET STREET, or a check drawn by a slate (Pub SN 11121,11128,12/5) NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT • A NEGATIVE DECLARATION BEFORE PLANNING COMMISSION project Title Update to wde regulations pertaining to fences, walls, and hedges. Appheation Z•OA07 -0001 CITY OF SARATOGA'S PLANNING COMMISSION announces the following public hearings Project Location on Vledit.dav, the 12th day of December at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers located at Chywide 13777 Fruirvale .Avenue, Saratoga. CA 95070. Details and plans are available at the Saratoga Property Owncr(s) Community Development Department, Monday through Thursday, 7:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. If you Various have questions, Planners are available at the public counter bemsaen the hours of7:30 a.m. and 1200 Lead Agency and Address on City u ra l Samgm . Community Deselopm -c 1372 Fruitvale Avenue All inrerestcd persons may appear and be heard or he above time and place. If •voce challenge a deci- Sanrop, California 95070 Sion of the Planning Commission pursuant to a public hearing in court, you may be limited t0 mis- Applicvu / Pmjca Sponwr ing only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hcaring(s) described in this notice, or City of Saamga Community Development in written correspondence delivered to the Saratoga Planning Commission at, or prior to, the pub- 137.7 Froi Avenue he hearing. In order to be included in the Planning Commissions information packets, written eom- Saratoga, California 95070 munieations should be filed on or before the Tuesday, a week before die meeting. - Contact Person and Phone Number Shwea Ohan - Aswcluc Planner A site visit will be held on the day preceding the hearing date listed above as part of the standard Site (408) 868 - 1266 Visit Committee agenda.- Site visits occur between 3:30 and 5:00 p.m.- The site visit is open to the public.- The Site Visit Committee will convene at the Ciry Hall parking lot at 330 p.m. on the day Pmi— Description rccedin nc� hearing and visit the site listed above and may visit other sites as well. For more in for- 11,c Ciry ofm n op is Imking to p—ide upd— o h, code a: itarei.— m kit —11 , and hedge, whh nc� follow. P S g i g R aft i odh (1) en eublisl. . mzi proem the would IL w prop t. wners eo ad ehc ro +u IF — h please contact the Community Development Department at 408 868 -1222 or review the Site iurd fence height (2) to add vo heght 0mietions around driveway aprons, •and (3) .o clarify ambig ... z 1.ngmge and arw of the code rho.. end., diff 1, in enf. Visit Agenda on the City Websirc at www.sammga.ca.us. Reason for Negn.ve to he tun "Ibc proposed update ca he talc, as it rehces to fence -s, walls, and hedges, is or anridpucd m Huse any subsamial APPLICATION# 7-OA -07 -0003 (City Wide) Neglected Properties Ordinance:- The Planning adverse i.,Pacrs on nc� en in n ovr, Commimion will consider a draft ordinance to set .nandanls for the minimum level of maintenance Review N i d of private property in Saratoga.- The ordinance would establish standards for (1) general property NIoo "c "n rc` vding rhea necmcss -ii., , or CAty 10 not t I 5:0 taus ode 'ary by the Saatuga Planning en. q lu,- men Avcnuc, ei, Or.&q(o n' is tL 5:00 I'3f January 03. 2008. maintenance (c.g., overgrown vegetation, unsecured structures, or conditions of deterioration or dis - Datm,wdy /Floc lzd hli He repair that cmares a substantial adverse impact on neighboring properties). (2) single Family resider- Ten. dvdy whcdukd for rL nn�� cue on Rcv ew January 23, 200B.,Plm.ning (:omn n herring: ek plea so tial use landscaping, (3) multifamily residential use landscaping, and (3) parkstrips between sidewalks nc, Civic Audiu.ninn (13777 Freievale A—c, Sa oga, Calif—ia) and City streets.- The ordinance would also specify enforcement and appeals procedures. Copies Asailabk for Public Renew The Inieial Study is available for public review at Ciry Hall, Planning Depanmene located at 13777 Fruitvalc Avenue. (Pub SN 11/28107) 1 1 (Pub SN 11/2810 • ATTACHMENT 7 � • V: gi -r' v u. It IAN jT"7 x Uff, t, HBO, F. p �T? '64 Nib �Yj *'70 mw 'A P F , 1001110$01110*0 W � A" ��'F y , 4*yx SoUthe�astf rb. Satato mn. y o8it bkingl �u �nn-'vv�allie� -99 u v !zzw M V. NMI MR-,' gi, f5. V 4r. "'MM A :4` 5 M, 74o 'R tr '44 'A, 410 :4440 .S' - eta sk MY 05:� s -4 - , Oil 6— APO Saratoga Presbyterian Church Q e ON 20455 Herriman Avenue �? . Saratoga, CA 95070 metroPCS. 1/15/07 Site # SM8160B s a Photosimulation by Applied Imagination 510 914 -0500 • r11 • C, OVERAGE, coverage, Yellow=mobile coverage, Red--marginal OLACION'coverage H 21-17 1 1 vlefropcs Site SF1816 fshownas NOT on-air C, OVERAGE, coverage, Yellow=mobile coverage, Red--marginal OLACION'coverage H 21-17 1 MleAl -OP S Site SF18,16 (shown as on -air in this P101) 9-19-01 .. €)VER `af:" E: Gn en=in- buiklin coverage, Y llt }=v rnol::i1e coverage; Red marginal OUtdoor coverage T 7 • 0 ATTACHMENT 8 r� x, nnetro I - 4 y SF1 8160B SARATOGA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH' c ZD Z m O 0 SITE FOOTHILL PARK d HERRIMAN AVE oGP 5P SARATOGA 9 VICINITY MAP o DIRECTIONS FROM METRO PCS OFFICE AT 1080 MARINA VILLAGE PKWY, ALAMEDA, CA: 1. TAKE 1 -880 SOUTH TOWARD SAN JOSE - GO 20.5 MI 2. TAKE THE CA -84 WEST EXIT TOWARD DUMBARTON BR - GO 8.7 MI 3. TURN LEFT ON WILLOW RD - GO 1.0 MI 4. BEAR RIGHT ONTO -US-101 SOUTH TOWARD SAN JOSE - GO 6.0 MI 5. TAKE EXIT #398B ONTO CA -85 SOUTH TOWARD SANTA CRUZ /CUPERTINO - GO 8.2 MI 6. TAKE THE DE ANZA BOULEVARD EXIT - GO 0.2 MI 7. BEAR RIGHT ON S DE ANZA BLVD - GO 0.4 MI 8. CONTINUE ON SARATOGA SUNNYVALE RD - GO 1.8 MI 9. TURN LEFT ON HERRIMAN AVE - GO < 0.1 MI 10. ARRIVE AT 20455 HERRIMAN AVE, SARATOGA, ON THE LEFT DRIVING DIRECTIONS 20455 HERRIMAN AVENUE SARATOGA, CA 95070 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA THE PROJECT INVOLVES THE INSTALLATION OF: -(1) TOI- SECTOR ANTENNA CYLINDER CONCEALED WITHIN NEW CONCEALMENT CROSS. -(1) COMPACT CABINET MOUNTED ON (N) CONC. SLAB. -ANT_ ,NA COAXIAL TRANSMISSION LINES FROM BTS TO ANTENNAS. -POWER AND TELEPHONE SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED FROM EXISTING SOURCES. LPaOJECT DESCRIPTION APPLICANT /LESSEE DESCRIPTION METRO PCS INC. T1 1080 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY, 4TH FLOOR ALAMEDA, CA 94501 T2 LEASING MANAGER ZONING MANAGER MATT DOOLING TOM SPAULDING (650; :,20 -4349 (650) 380 -3140 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER JAMES WEILAND METRO PCS INC. 1080 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY, 4TH FLOOR ALAMEDA, CA 94501 (510) 258 -6998 PROPERTY INFORMATION LANDLCRD: THE PRESBYTERIAN OF SAN JOSE ADDRESS: 20455 HERRIMAN AVE j, SARATOGA, CA 95070 CONTACT: SUSAN GRIGGS PHONE: (408) 867 -0144 AREA' OF CONSTRUCTION: 84t SQ. FT. OCCUR /NCY TYPE: S -2 COIN TF JCTION TYPE: TYPE V -N CURR =P r ZONING: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAT: 37' 16' 03.86" N (NAD 83) LONG 122' 01' 53.43" W A.P.N : 393 -41 -032 HAND.C,.P METRO PCS FACILITY IS UN- MANNED AND REQU R MENTS: NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. DISABLED ACCESS NOT REQUIRED. OJECT SUMMARY ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES. 1. 2001 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE 2. UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 3. BUILDING OFFICIALS AND CODE ADMINISTRATORS (BOCA) 4. UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE 5. ANSI /EIA -222 -F 6. LIFE SAFETY CODE NFPA -101 7. UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE 8. NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE 9. CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 10. CITY /COUNTY ORDINANCES 11. 1999 NFPA 72,LIFE SAFETY CODE 12. NFPA 13, SPRINKLER CODE 13. TITLE 24, ENERGY CODE I CODE COMPLIANCE ARCHITECT MICHAEL WILK ARCHITECTURE 222 SUTTER STREET, SUITE 400 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108 CONTACT: JAMES VACCARO CONTACT NUMBER: (415) 350 -6346 FAX NUMBER: (415) 362 -8911 SURVEYOR PHIL AUER SURVEYING 2218 BLACK CREEK STREET BAKERSFIELD, CA 93312 CONTACT NUMBER: (661) 587 -6129 MOBILE NUMBER: (510) 714 -7224 PROJECT TEAM SHEET DESCRIPTION REV. T1 TITLE SHEET 4 T2 GENERAL NOTES 4 T3 ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS/ ANTENNA CONFIGURATION CHART 4 LS1 SURVEY 4 Al OVERALL SITE PLAN 4 A2 ENLARGED PROJECT AREA PLAN 4 A3 ENLARGED EQUIPMENT PLAN, ANTENNA LAYOUT, DETAILS 4 A4 ELEVATIONS 4 00 7- o O I- car) ��Q//�� 0 LU n/ L� LO 04 fn SHEETINDEX TITLE SIGNATURE DATE LEASING ZONING CONSTRUCTION LANDLORD RF ENGINEER SIGNATURE BLOCK DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL -SIZE AT 24 "X36 ". CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT /ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR MATERIAL ORDERS OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO PREVENT STORM WATER POLLUTION DURING CONSTRUCTION. I GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES -\\ 17n I �•MU Michael Wilk Architecture 222 Sutter Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94108 tel: 415.839.9594 fax: 415.362.8911 inc. z >° a b w a U g0.4 O � LL Q Z £ W a�g o Q 0 E �v PROJECT NO. SF161608 DRAWN BY SIT CHECKED BY MICHAEL MLK 1 2 101/12/071 100% ZONING I SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET T -1 z >° Q Q0 oOWVaa cfl0�� �v 0 00 Q w 00 7- o O I- car) ��Q//�� 0 LU n/ L� LO 04 fn PROJECT NO. SF161608 DRAWN BY SIT CHECKED BY MICHAEL MLK 1 2 101/12/071 100% ZONING I SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET T -1 11 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD, WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFK'IAL WITH A NOTATION INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND THAT THEY HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED AND SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THEIR DESIGN AND SUBMITT /,L DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. ❑ SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION ❑ CONCRETE OVER 2500 PSI AT 28 DAYS ❑ CONCRETE PLACEMENT AT SLAB ON GRADE ❑ WRITTEN CERTIFICATION FOR PROPER PLACEMENT OF REINFORCEMENTS AT SLAB ON GRADE ❑ FOUNDATION EXCAVATION AND FILL INCLUDING UTILITY TRENCHES ❑ CERTIFICATION OF BUILDING PAD, FOUNDATION AND FILL BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OF THE RECORD ❑ VERIFICATIONS OF MILL REPORT ❑ IDENTIFICATION OF STEEL AND AT JOB SITE ❑ ADHESIVE BOLTS IN CONCRETE OR MASONRY ❑ ANCHOR BOLTS INSTALLATION AND PLACEMENT IN CONCRETE ❑ HIGH STRENGTH BOLTING ❑ EXPANSION ANCHOR INSTALLATION ❑ SPRAYED -ON- FIREPROOFING ❑ STRUCTURAL MASONRY ❑ PRESTRESSED CONCRETE ❑ ALL FIELD WELDING ❑ REINFORCING PLACEMENT ❑ DESIGNER SPECIFIED (SEE SHEET # - -) ❑ OTHER---- - - - - -- SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS 1 6 1 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK, SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES, AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR DRILLING PIERS AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW. THIS WILL INCLUDE BUT NO BE LIMITED TO A) FALL PROTECTION B) CONFINED SPACE C) ELECTRICAL SAFETY D) TRENCHING & EXCAVATION. 3. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 4. IF NECESSARY, RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBRIS, STICKS, STONES AND OTHER REFUSE SHALL BE FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. 5. ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES, WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE REMOVED AND /OR CAPPED, PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF CONTRACTOR, OWNER AND /OR LOCAL UTILITIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SITE SIGNAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIOI FOR SITE SIGNAGE. 8. THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY FROM THE BTS EQUIPMENT AND TOWER AREAS. 9. NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR EMBANKMENT. 10. THE SUB GRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION. 11. THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED BY THE TOWER, EQUIPMENT OR DRIVEWAY, SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE, AND STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION AS SPECIFIED IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, IF REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. SITE WORK GENERAL NOTES E WITH THE ACI 301, ACI 318, ACI 336, ASTM SEE SHEET T -3 FOR ANTENNA CONCRETEM A185 AND THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR CAST -IN -PLACE SPECIFICATIONS 2. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 2500 PSI AT 28 DAYS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615, GRADE 60, DEFORMED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 185 WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPLICES SHALL BE CLASS "B" AND ALL HOOKS SHALL BE STANDARD, UNO. ANTENNA CONFIGURATION CHART MANUFACTURER: MARATHON MODEL NO.: M12V155FT TYPE: STATIONARY SEALED LEAD -ACID BATTERY TYPE PER UNIT # OF BATTERIES TOTAL VOLUME I WEIGHT VOLUME I WEIGHT LITER GALLONI KG I LEIS LITER IGALLONI KG I LEIS TOTAL ELECTROLYTE 7.9 2.1 10.5 23.2 10 79 21 105 232 SULFURIC ACID 2.4 0.64 4.5 9.8 10 24 6.4 45 98 BATTERY WEIGHT N/A N/A 54.1 119 10 N/A N/A 541 1190 BATTERY CHART SYMBOLS 4. THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR REINFORCING STEEL 7 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS: CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH ........ 3 IN. CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER: 6 AND LARGER ..........................2 IN. 5 AND SMALLER & WWF.........1 1/2 IN. CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER OR NOT CAST AGAINST THE GROUND: SLAB AND WALL .....................3/4 IN. BEAMS AND COLUMNS ...............1 1/2 IN. 5. A CHAMFER 3/4" SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE, UNO,IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301 SECTION 4.2.4. 6. INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPANSION /WEDGE ANCHOR, SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE. THE ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD SHALL CONFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR EMf 1. FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWING, THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS SHALL APPLY: CONTRACTOR - GENERAL CONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR - SUBCONTRACTOR OWNER - CARRIER OEM - ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER 2. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, THE BIDDING CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE CELL SITE TO FAMILIARIZE WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TO CONFIRM THAT THE WORK CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. ANY DISCREPANCY FOUND SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF ARCHITECT /ENGINEER. 3. ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED AND INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICA CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ISSUE ALL APPROPRIATE NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS, AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. 4. ALL WORK CARRIED OUT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES, ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE CODE AND REGULATIONS. 5. DRAWINGS PROVIDED HERE ARE NOT TO BE SCALED AND ARE INTENDED TO SHOW OUTLINE ONLY 6. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES, AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE. 8. IF THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT CANNOT BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE ARCHITECT /ENGINEER, 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ACTUAL ROUTING OF CONDUIT, POWER AND T1 CABLES, GROUNDIN CABLES AS SHOWN ON THE POWER, GROUNDING AND TELCO PLAN DRAWING. CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE EXISTING TRAYS AND /OR SHALL ADD NEW TRAYS AS NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THE ACTUAL ROUTING WITH THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, PAVEMENTS, CURBS, LANDSCAPING AN( STRUCTURES. ANY DAMAGED PART SHALL BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF OWNER. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL LEGALLY AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL SCRAP MATERIALS SUCH AS COA CABLES AND OTHER ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE EXISTING FACILITY. ANTENNAS REMOVED SHALL BE 3 RETURNED TO THE OWNER'S DESIGNATED LOCATION. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION. I CONCRETE AND REINFORCING STEEL NOTES 1 4 1 1. ALL STEEL WORK SHALL BE PAINTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A36 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8 2. ALL WELDING SHALL BE PERFORMED USING E70XX ELECTRODES AND WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO AISC. WHERE FILLET WELD SIZES ARE NOT SHOWN, PROVIDE THE MINIMUM SIZE PER TABLE J2.4 IN THE AISC "MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION ". PAINTED SURFACES SHALL BE TOUCHED UP. 3. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE ASTM A325 BEARING TYPE (3/4 "0) CONNECTIONS AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4. NON- STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS FOR STEEL GRATING MAY USE 5/8" DIA. ASTM A 307 BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5. INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPANSION /WEDGE ANCHOR, SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE. THE ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD SHALL CONFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. NO REBAR SHALL BE CUT WITHOUT PRIOR CONTRACTOR APPROVAL WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN CONCRETE. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, REQUIRED BY GOVERNING CODES, SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MANUFACTURER'S MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOADS. STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES 15 13. ALL CONCRETE REPAIR WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE (ACI) 301. 14. ANY NEW CONCRETE NEEDED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION SHALL HAVE 2500 PSI STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS. ALL CONCRETING WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318 CODE REQUIREMENTS. 15. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AISC SPECIFICATIONS. 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK. ALL DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS MUST BE VERIFIEC CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIAL OR PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 17. THE EXISTING CELL SITE IS IN FULL COMMERCIAL OPERATION. ANY CONSTRUCTION WORK BY CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISRUPT THE EXISTING NORMAL OPERATION. ANY WORK ON EXISTING EQUIPMENT MUST BE COORDINATED WITH CONTRACTOR. ALSO, WORK SHOULD BE SCHEDULED FOR AN APPROPRIATE MAINTENANCE WINDOW USUALLY IN LOW TRAFFIC PERIODS AFTER MIDNIGHT. 18. SINCE THE CELL SITE IS ACTIVE, ALL SAFETY PRECAUTIONS MUST BE TAKEN WHEN WORKING AROUND HIGH LEVELS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION. EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE SHUTDOWN PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY WORK THAT COULD EXPOSE THE WORKERoLIjroAODooS TO DANGER. PERSONAL RE EXPOSURE MONITORS ARE ADVISED TO BE WORN TO ALERT OF ANY DANGEROUS EXPOSURE LEVELS. 19. PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2 -A OR 2- A /10 -BC WITHIN 75 FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO PREVENT STORM WATER POLLUTION DURING CONSTRUCTION. GENERALNOTES ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES. -2001 BUILDING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PART 1, TITLE 24 C.C.R. -2001 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE(CBC), PART 2, TITLE 24, C.C.R. (1997) UNIFORM BUILDING CODE VOLUMES 1 -3 AND -2001 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) -2004 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC), PART 3, TITLE 24 C.C.R. (2005 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND 2001 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) -2001 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CIVIC), PART 4, TITLE 24 C.C.R. (1997 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE AND 2001 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) -2001 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC), PART 5, TITLE 24 C.C.R. (1997 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE AND 2001 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) -2001 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, PART 9, TITLE 24 C.C.R. (1997 UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND 2001 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) -2001 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS, PART 12, TITLE 24 C.C.R. -TITLE 19 C.C.R., PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE FIRE MARSHALL REGULATIONS APPLICABLE CODES 12 Michael Wilk Architecture 222 Sutter Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94108 tel: 415.839.9594 fax: 415.362.8911 inc. CL w d of O O goU O Q LL Q 2r+ w a�5 0 4 0 $ SPOT ELEVATION ; O GROUT OR PLASTER Q Qz r CONCRETE Q REVISION EARTH O GRID REFERENCE 2rz PLYWOOD 00 x e DETAIL REFERENCE L GRAVEL w = U WOOD CONTINUOUS cU)'^ VJ L ELEVATION REFERENCE i� WOOD BLOCKING N U) STEEL SECTION REFERENCE SYMBOLS 4. THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR REINFORCING STEEL 7 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS: CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH ........ 3 IN. CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER: 6 AND LARGER ..........................2 IN. 5 AND SMALLER & WWF.........1 1/2 IN. CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER OR NOT CAST AGAINST THE GROUND: SLAB AND WALL .....................3/4 IN. BEAMS AND COLUMNS ...............1 1/2 IN. 5. A CHAMFER 3/4" SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE, UNO,IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301 SECTION 4.2.4. 6. INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPANSION /WEDGE ANCHOR, SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE. THE ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD SHALL CONFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR EMf 1. FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWING, THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS SHALL APPLY: CONTRACTOR - GENERAL CONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR - SUBCONTRACTOR OWNER - CARRIER OEM - ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER 2. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, THE BIDDING CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE CELL SITE TO FAMILIARIZE WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TO CONFIRM THAT THE WORK CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. ANY DISCREPANCY FOUND SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF ARCHITECT /ENGINEER. 3. ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED AND INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICA CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ISSUE ALL APPROPRIATE NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS, AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. 4. ALL WORK CARRIED OUT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES, ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE CODE AND REGULATIONS. 5. DRAWINGS PROVIDED HERE ARE NOT TO BE SCALED AND ARE INTENDED TO SHOW OUTLINE ONLY 6. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES, AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE. 8. IF THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT CANNOT BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE ARCHITECT /ENGINEER, 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ACTUAL ROUTING OF CONDUIT, POWER AND T1 CABLES, GROUNDIN CABLES AS SHOWN ON THE POWER, GROUNDING AND TELCO PLAN DRAWING. CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE EXISTING TRAYS AND /OR SHALL ADD NEW TRAYS AS NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THE ACTUAL ROUTING WITH THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, PAVEMENTS, CURBS, LANDSCAPING AN( STRUCTURES. ANY DAMAGED PART SHALL BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF OWNER. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL LEGALLY AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL SCRAP MATERIALS SUCH AS COA CABLES AND OTHER ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE EXISTING FACILITY. ANTENNAS REMOVED SHALL BE 3 RETURNED TO THE OWNER'S DESIGNATED LOCATION. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION. I CONCRETE AND REINFORCING STEEL NOTES 1 4 1 1. ALL STEEL WORK SHALL BE PAINTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A36 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8 2. ALL WELDING SHALL BE PERFORMED USING E70XX ELECTRODES AND WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO AISC. WHERE FILLET WELD SIZES ARE NOT SHOWN, PROVIDE THE MINIMUM SIZE PER TABLE J2.4 IN THE AISC "MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION ". PAINTED SURFACES SHALL BE TOUCHED UP. 3. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE ASTM A325 BEARING TYPE (3/4 "0) CONNECTIONS AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4. NON- STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS FOR STEEL GRATING MAY USE 5/8" DIA. ASTM A 307 BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5. INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPANSION /WEDGE ANCHOR, SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE. THE ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD SHALL CONFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. NO REBAR SHALL BE CUT WITHOUT PRIOR CONTRACTOR APPROVAL WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN CONCRETE. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, REQUIRED BY GOVERNING CODES, SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MANUFACTURER'S MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOADS. STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES 15 13. ALL CONCRETE REPAIR WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE (ACI) 301. 14. ANY NEW CONCRETE NEEDED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION SHALL HAVE 2500 PSI STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS. ALL CONCRETING WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318 CODE REQUIREMENTS. 15. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AISC SPECIFICATIONS. 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK. ALL DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS MUST BE VERIFIEC CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIAL OR PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 17. THE EXISTING CELL SITE IS IN FULL COMMERCIAL OPERATION. ANY CONSTRUCTION WORK BY CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISRUPT THE EXISTING NORMAL OPERATION. ANY WORK ON EXISTING EQUIPMENT MUST BE COORDINATED WITH CONTRACTOR. ALSO, WORK SHOULD BE SCHEDULED FOR AN APPROPRIATE MAINTENANCE WINDOW USUALLY IN LOW TRAFFIC PERIODS AFTER MIDNIGHT. 18. SINCE THE CELL SITE IS ACTIVE, ALL SAFETY PRECAUTIONS MUST BE TAKEN WHEN WORKING AROUND HIGH LEVELS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION. EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE SHUTDOWN PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY WORK THAT COULD EXPOSE THE WORKERoLIjroAODooS TO DANGER. PERSONAL RE EXPOSURE MONITORS ARE ADVISED TO BE WORN TO ALERT OF ANY DANGEROUS EXPOSURE LEVELS. 19. PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2 -A OR 2- A /10 -BC WITHIN 75 FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO PREVENT STORM WATER POLLUTION DURING CONSTRUCTION. GENERALNOTES ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES. -2001 BUILDING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PART 1, TITLE 24 C.C.R. -2001 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE(CBC), PART 2, TITLE 24, C.C.R. (1997) UNIFORM BUILDING CODE VOLUMES 1 -3 AND -2001 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) -2004 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC), PART 3, TITLE 24 C.C.R. (2005 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND 2001 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) -2001 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CIVIC), PART 4, TITLE 24 C.C.R. (1997 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE AND 2001 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) -2001 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC), PART 5, TITLE 24 C.C.R. (1997 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE AND 2001 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) -2001 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, PART 9, TITLE 24 C.C.R. (1997 UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND 2001 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) -2001 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS, PART 12, TITLE 24 C.C.R. -TITLE 19 C.C.R., PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE FIRE MARSHALL REGULATIONS APPLICABLE CODES 12 Michael Wilk Architecture 222 Sutter Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94108 tel: 415.839.9594 fax: 415.362.8911 inc. CL w d of O O goU O Q LL Q 2r+ w a�5 0 4 0 PROJECT NO. SF1B160B DRAWN BY SH CHECKED BY MICHAEL WLK 1 01/04/07 90% ZONING 2 101/12/071 100% ZONING 1 4105/02/071100% ZONING REV.1 SHEET TITLE GENERAL NOTES SHEET NUMBER T -2 ; O Q Qz r a L0 c°o0LJ 00 - � � a � LL w = U w LO cU)'^ VJ L a N U) PROJECT NO. SF1B160B DRAWN BY SH CHECKED BY MICHAEL WLK 1 01/04/07 90% ZONING 2 101/12/071 100% ZONING 1 4105/02/071100% ZONING REV.1 SHEET TITLE GENERAL NOTES SHEET NUMBER T -2 Michael Wilk Architecture 222 Sutter Street, Suite 400 x San Francisco, CA 94108 83'1 DG70VTREM _: D�C'��e� tel: 415.839.9594 tA5 Three Sector Antenna- r- ^�BaseSta6onAntertnas " fax: 415.362.8911 - hl5: gtt1{,. 114 uE& E t R X311 ) ar irSERY18fl� i(r'OIn nFl,�SF fil ZIn�tB, 2�OMnt)>tr Te'�`�' � {t a li 3 inc. e:71�#IWS %f9[d6j>EfId8r, Ba317t j11�t000 R1jZ2 B�t`�} SBCTQT !ii +f ka A li r 41 Tyi I rkA3 f !. 31 } - A ra#l�e(t�a jkstft�n d 5 i {p 5 ni @er i a f>1•U1 is ). i ?I JtAEi [ i r� I IZ i1tR �di4 s r 1 �'^7 �s} A tin F }ai v)i t i i Fult�f cafe fla ge lt}�Ggtm Jt f jm kell 3r �,S„#i � ,)A!I t fit , c� 4.. : ,: 3 {iF f •111�''r . {: t.t - ItRk 81 : 1 +:1, iiG I � r k q'46nay(MHzJ 1850 1990 I' F i . Polati2arion" S45 - YY a f ;.Oain (dBtl/d8q - n:lmutn Bw nes ) 7o g ° - Elevadon BW (Deg.i 7 5 9. J v > 46L6'(dBf.. G w �e I .-From Toiaok Ratio (dB) 25 5.: -" - - tsolatlon 4tlgj 25 - tr. I p,. YSNfR 14 PIM3V 2 x 20W - ` ;Max. Input Povrer(Wirtis):. 250 12 - Lightning Prote a DC Ground s 1 t 5 i P t 4 MECHANIGAL i 71,509 '- 'DImM151onB (LxOD) x 160 mm �- f ' (594 x63In) :Max WindArea ; A 016 m +(17tl } t t ' Max Wind Load 100 mph) 2824 N r - $ W z (� (5916Q �c 1 f .. Max Wind Speed - 2111 kmM (125 mph) - — Material Galvanized Steel t Q LO ' :Hardware -•kn1 _ Connootor Typo j 7 16 D1tJ Fensaie >, _ i ., a # _ t T I :Color i A L6.16oGom)t p., i Standard Mounting Haidware 084549.001 L 1 i i xk O �0WU�� Q t co co W 1 r+ ,`Y < y V J W LO a N f/) i '_;AnA'eW Corpor�ipn Feu 21Q,631�. 4706 ...� .IA4 -tes TYpiCal - 2681 r61k0'f' Pbr Way Toll Ree.Tak 1 600 678 53% 2, t" �1Q78(10 b5 Ricnerdson, TeiasUSR75032.3621 ;, Fax 1800:2294706 _ :Tel'214631..0356 -U –: ', t ... ra,'w agtre✓+:com ",., 7 dbtecfi@a� drew cum 1a1wn a i correct at Ga a pt,issue bvl mey De sudject fo the ge x shout rsofce r ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS ANTENNA # OF AZIMUTH RAID ANTENNA MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL RET RET CABLE MAIN CABLE CABLE TOP JUMPER BOTTOM JUMPER CABLE #AND PORT # COLOR CODE COMMENTS ANTENNA MAIN CABLE CABLE CABLE # AND COMMENTS PROJECT N0. SF181608 SECTOR ANTENNAS CENTER MAKE / MODEL TILT TILT . LENGTH LENGTH SIZE LENGTH LENGTH MAKE/MODEL LENGTH SIZE PORT # DRAWN BY SH —� ALPHA 1 90 44' -1 N' A.G.L. ANDREW 931 DG7OVTREM 0• 0• DAISY 170' 160' 7/8 "0 t6' t6' TX /RX 1/1 RX — 2/2 RED WHITE/ RED GPS LUCENT 190' 1/2 "0 RX: PORT 7 CHECKED BY MICHAEL WILK N AT ISSUE 1 101/04/071 90% ZONING 2 01 12 07 100% ZONING BETA 1 210' �44'-10 }' A.G.L. ANDREW 931 ANDREW 0' 0' DAISY t5' 160' 7/8 "0 t6' t6' TX /RX 1/3 RX — 2/4 BLUE WHITE/ BLUE INSIDE STEALTH CROSS 3 01 22 07 100% ZONING REV. AT ROOF TOP 4 05/02/071100% ZONING REV. GAMMA 1 330' 1:44'— 10} A.G.L. ANDREW 931 DG7OVrREM 0' 0• DAISY t5' 160' 7/8 "0 t6' t6' TX /RX 1/5 RX — 2/6 GREEN WHITE/ GREEN SHEET TITLE I ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS SHEET NUMBER 2 THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ORDERING ANY EQUIPMENT. ENNA L CONFIGURATION CHART OVERALL SITE MAP SCALE. 1 =60' ' TR. NO. 3034 11 1R. NO. 3074 ' TR. LNO. uJOJ4 ' 7R. 1 LN0. 36 ' 7R. N0. d034 ' f5* (181 M. 28) (181 M. 28) (181 M. .$) (161 M. 26) (161 M. 28) - -L- -- - - - - -- ---------------------r 589'55'Ot'E 488.55'- -- -' 1 LOT 39 5' W.C.E. TR. NO. 3034 (161 M. 26) (161 M. 26) ' I I M�� - - -- P.U.E. - PUBLIC UTLITY EASEMENT !i - 5' P.U.E. ' r W.C.E.-WIRE CLEARANCE EASEMENT Ix I I (161 M. 26) 0 CP 11 18 70.00' I i0 LOT 40 i W (II I' TR. N0. 3034 I (161 M. 26> J o CP 1J Q a 9 �- 5' W.C.E. /`- �,• 0 1I (t 61 M. 26) A.P.N. 393 -41 -032 / ' \, I LOT 44 8��3 TR. M. 26)4 5' W.C.E. 'Pi ry 5, Z ` w' I o CP to Z Z a (161 M. 26) TR.Lr°1o. 3o3a GRAPHIC SCALE 1'= 10' z a�'] SEE (161 M. 26) to ` FN plw �`. �� ..� SITE MAP 1 '\. 0 10 20 30 �� z �� 1 i� CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1' 1-0 1I I I 3 �� a� �rv> Q I aC -) 0' '^a I ni''o 1I _ " LOT 42 ow I I I .J to TR. NO. 3034 (161 M. 26) j EAVE EL- 455.4 AMSL I rn I I �2J � N 'i �(� _ II LOT 43 TR. NO. 3034 - fTSM`tiy Oz a (161 M. 26) GRAPHIC SCALE 1'= 60' _ b:J _ 0l0 S I I DR=20.00' 884�50� _ { __ a'� j kµ7,2 L= 30.96' ' \' n 0 I 0 60 120 180 c. ^IN 12* O CP 2' 6X1 _'g - I - - _ 399.55' __---- -� - - -- �j f2':UW CP 20 ;PP q N8816'S14W �i�7 i u7.OX" ________ ^___ f 0 Y� I j ` ���_��� HERRIMAN AVE. CP 22 ------- - - - - - -- �� 4µ.2x ) ��pPA L£L 4,6.d 4in CROSS 1 f1' avMr 1, f2 QVHF j �s� EL- 496.8' AMSL ROOF RIDGE HT =49.6' AGL LATITUDE k LONGITUDE EL= 489.6' AMSL (t / TAKEN HERE 7.t � 447.00 j GROUND 12' a1W \ y2. x EL= 447.2' AMSL A.P.N. 393 -41 -032 S , - = PROJECT BENCH LOT 44 \ I - ^447•° CORNER OF CONCRETE TR. No. 3034 -�, , DEC_Anit O BUILDING CORNER 1 (161 M. 26) f'"4v 1 i -A- i FOLYf EL= 448.4' AMSL 12' aJK i ,148.9 1 µ7.o ,�Mp0 P 7 x 447:1 ROOF RIDGE •6 "' EL= 478.9' AMSL _fGUTTER X414.7 r� I XCOLUMN _ �p �- ,.'HEAVE ` µ7, s78.H -EL= 455.4' AN1SIi OUTDRAIy ' Y�`ti, X 1 ° t µB7 i SUDING ��� �ff I I 446.6 �µzt ��' DOOR S I I 4�.� -✓� --�� { ,\ 7P� ,[t!' UTILITY CABINET A.C. UNITS 4µ.7x -�j/ �i �8 , ; �'�!CC"""i�fl EL= 455.5' AMSL I (GAS) X 061 it 1 �\ r 1 -- -- -- _-- -_ _An1f EAVE µ . - EL= 455.4' AMSL 12 "OUl£ xµs.7 WgLL ' f4J �� tXEAVrE' i H7. - ZE = 41'5.4' AMSL q _ ' , -CP 6 O '.i rWA14Z Q -GAt VALVE CP �J �_y l 6 1µ5.1X x, X µ7.1x CP- 5447 d,446.9X c'VAULT GATE 6V�E5 µ7.2X 1 1 r WALL ELECTRICAL 446.5X 11 µ7.2X COWPW 448.g% 0 WELL 11 ) BUS. X µ7.4x 1 µS.4 ^' 11 ': O C �- 24' BUS4£5' i � aa1', � s � , L L CONCRETE �_�_ = \J �/ PLANTER ��___�_�_ � ' SIGN < `" �`- X 1 i 46 4469X 4.9 ,, µz1 �S i ELEATULT p L L x445.9 'a"� µ8.4x l ' 11 r`�"l ,� / SANITARY 44.4 SEWER CLEANOUT '1 LIGHT ---/// ' w /1' CIA. BASE UGC (L) `+ LEGEND - MetroPCS 1080 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY 4TH FLOOR ALAMEDA, CA 94501 �510� SZS -2610 EDGE OF PAVEMENT MANHOLE FIRE HYDRANT E E OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE -x X X- FENCE LINE - __-- _- _-- _-- - - -_ -- PROPERTY LINE AMSL........ ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL AGL...........ABOVE GROUND LEVEL O CP III FIELD CONTROL POINT LIGHT POLE MONUMENT ) _ J l.L'!') TREE Q HANDICAPPED (�. PARKING PROJECT INFORMATION: SARATOGA PRESBYTERIAN SF181606 20455 HERRIMAN AVE. SARATOGA, CA 95070 SANTA CLARA COUNTY JOINT OE •JP TELEPHONE TP POWER *PP POLE + SPOT e2- 1241x' ELEVATION DATE OF SURVEY: 12/15/06 SURVEYED BY/ OR UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: Oliver 075 Auer L.S. 5075 Expires 06/30/07 NOTES: COMPLETE PRELIMINARY REPORT (WITH ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION) WAS AVAILABLE AT TIME OF FIELD SURVEY. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. THIS IS A SPECIALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY MAP WITH PROPERTY LINES AND EASEMENTS BEING A GRAPHIC DEPICTION OF VARIOUS INFORMATION GATHERED FROM PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORTS OR PROPERTY HISTORY REPORTS, BACK -UP DOCUMENTS OF RECORD, MAPS AND AVAILABLE MONUMENTS FOUND DURING THE FIELD SURVEY. NO PROPERTY MONUMENTS WERE SET. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, NO UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATING SERVICE COMPANY WAS CONTACTED PRIOR TO THIS MAP BEING PREPARED; THEREFORE, THERE MAY BE NON - VISIBLE R OBSCURE UTILITIES EXISTING ON THE PROPERTY NOT SHOWN ON THIS MAP. SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, CITY OF SARATOGA, BEING LOT 44 AS SHOWN UPON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED TRACT N0. 3034 BEING WHICH MAP WAS FILED FOR RECORD ON MAY 17, 1963, IN BOOK 181 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 26, SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDS. LEASE AREA DESCRIPTION (PARCEL A): NO LEASE AREA SET AT TIME OF FIELD VISIT. TOGETHER WITH AN ACCESS ROUTE FROM THE LEASE AREA TO THE PUBLIC ROAD. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED AT A LATER DATE. TOGETHER WITH UTILITY AND POWER ROUTES NECESSARY TO SERVE THE LEASE AREA. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED AT A LATER DATE. BASIS OF ELEVATIONS: NGVD 29 DATUM. BASIS OF BEARINGS: CALIFORNIA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE 3, NAD 83. PROJECT BENCH: AS INDICATED HEREON. OWNER'S INFORMATION: THE PRESBYTERY OF SAN JOSE 20455 HERRIMAN AVE. A.P.N•393-41-032 0 70 NET AREA OF: UNDERLYING PARCEL(S): 4.227 AC. LEASE AREA: FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION OF LEASE AREA IN ZONE X, AREAS OF 500 -YEAR FLOOD; AREAS OF 100 -YEAR FLOOD WITH AVERAGE DEPTHS OF LESS THAN 1 FOOT OR WITH DRAINAGE AREAS LESS THAN 1 SQUARE MILE' AND AREAS PROTECTED BY LEVEES FROM 100 -YEAR FLOOD, AS SHOWN ON FEMA FIRM MAP COMMUNITY -PANEL NUMBER 0603510004C, DATED JULY 3, 1997. FAA to CERTIFICATION: LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE WAS OBTAINED FROM INFORMATION PROVIDED BY A GPS SURVEY. THE GEODETIC POSITION SHOWN WAS DETERMINED UTILIZING FAST - STATIC GPS ECEIVERS.V THE N DATA WASSDiFFERENTMIALLY C USING ORRECTED BWITH TRIMBLE GPS SURVEY SOFTWARE. LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE DENOTED ON THIS PLAN ARE ACCURATE TO WITHIN 157 FEET HORIZONTALLY AND THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ACCURATE TO WITHIN 3f FEET VERTICALLY. ELEVATION OF GROUND AT GPS POINT: 447.2' AMSL STRUCTURE HEIGHT: TOP OF (E) ROSS/EL= 496.8' AMSI/HT =49.6' ACL LATITUDE: 37'16'04.06' LATITUDE: 37'16'03.86' LONGITUDE: 122'01'49.58' (NAD 27) LONGITUDE: 122'01'53.43' (NAD 83) THE MAP WAS PREPARED FOR METRO PCS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FILING A PERMIT WITH THE CITY OF SARATOGA. CURRENT ISSUE DATE: 12/18/06 ISSUED FOR: PERMIT REV.: =DATE: DESCRIPTION: - -BY: QA 12/18/06 ISSUED FOR DRAFT 1 TCN PLANS PREPARED BY: Phil Auer Surveying 2218 Black Creek St., Bakersfield, CA 93312 Phone: (681 587 -6129 Mobile: (51 714 -7224 E-mail: 1x5075 earthlink.net CONSULTANT: DRAWN BY: CHK. APV.: TCN OPA OPA LICENSURE: r. PREPARED BY OR UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE COX AVE. OI ROUND µ7.OXf' ,( ICAL) ^-- ________.447-- _____.___ µ8.4X µ .0X µ i 6.8x Oliver Philip Auer L.S. 5075 (Expires 06/30/07) 446.sx 446.9x _ 46.2% ° 448.5X ,4 µezx -_--- F_-_- ---- °- --- --- ---- _- __- --- -- --- -- -_ - -_ >•��_ _ - __ -_- -_ -- E CAL ` O1 -GAS VALVE ' ' x 1 LID COMMUNICATIONS OVERHEAD e [SIGN o �- - - - -' ---------- - - - - -" - - - - -- __- __ -AULT *.2X r POLE COMMUNICATIONS 'NO STOP' 7 0.11 1 ( . T LINE O 446.7x MAILBOX µg,7 �•ex ' *-i41�'e * -T -T , CP 3r LUVL1Pe>F µe2 µ6.1x T T * T WATER VALVE °� J z = y < 0 a THELMA AVE. OGPP P� PROJECT yPQ.. LOCATION HERRIMAN AVE. �" ALLENDALE AVE. ` SARATOGA SHEET TITLE: 47Up��� SURVEY SHEET NUMBER: REVISION: A LS1 8F18190B T T T JP TRAFFIC CURB r T VAULT VAULT G.AULT H E R R I MAN A �/ E VAULT POWER kIR TELEPHONE SITE MAP SCALE: 2 1• =10' to D X D O O D U) C Z Z -G D r m O D 0 �I 0 ZI (E) LANDSCAPING 2 PROPOSED METRO PCs ANTENNA LOCATION AT it Z �O (E) ROOF a W a i Q LO O goU 0 Q LL Q Z � W z CO T� (E) OLIVE TREES o 00 Q Q T m = W PROPOSED METRO PCS A_2 EQUIPMENT/ LEASE AREA LOCATION I � (E) SIGN i (E) OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE, TYP ------ - - - - - -. . (E) COMMUNICATIONS POLE OVERALL SITE PLAN =1i[ (E) WALL — — — PROPERTY LINE A.P.N. 393 -41 -032 h} f (E) LAWN _ Y– 77171 ue (E) MAIL BOX - - - 1 (E) WATER VALVE A -4 (E) WATER VAULT (E) A/C PARKING we PROPOSED METRO PCS POWER & TELCO CONDUIT ROUTE VIA BORE WITHIN 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED BORE PIT > a. (E) ELECTRICAL VAULT a PROPERTY LINE (E) JOINT POLE/ PROPOSED METRO PCS POWER & TELCO P.O.C. =R('c t 1.1 / / 4a7 oQ Michael Wilk Architecture 222 Sutter Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94108 tel: 415.839.9594 fax: 415.362.8911 inc. Z �O Q a W a Q LO O goU 0 Q LL Q Z � W z CO T� o 00 Q VJ L Q L, s CL N U) — — PROJECT N0. SF181608 J /. I DRAWN BY SH�� CHECKED BY MICHAEL WILK NO DATE ISSUE 1 01/04/071 90% ZONING 2 01 12 07 100% ZONING 3 01 22 07 100% ZONING REV. 4 OS 02 07100% ZONING REV. SHEET TITLE OVERALL SITE PLAN w SHEET NUMBER HERRIMAN AVENUE A -1 SCALE: ,.- 20' -0' 0 10' 20' 40' Z �O Q Q Q LO 100 z CO 0WV v 00 Q Q T m = W VJ L Q L, s CL N U) — — PROJECT N0. SF181608 J /. I DRAWN BY SH�� CHECKED BY MICHAEL WILK NO DATE ISSUE 1 01/04/071 90% ZONING 2 01 12 07 100% ZONING 3 01 22 07 100% ZONING REV. 4 OS 02 07100% ZONING REV. SHEET TITLE OVERALL SITE PLAN w SHEET NUMBER HERRIMAN AVENUE A -1 SCALE: ,.- 20' -0' 0 10' 20' 40' PROPOSED METRO- PCS BORE PIT LOCATION PROPOSED METRO- PCS POWER/TELCO ROUTE VIA BORE WITHIN 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT I ENLARGED PROJECT AREA PLAN (E) GAS VALVE VAULT Michael Wilk Architecture 222 Sutter Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94108 tel: 415.839.9594 fax: 415.362.8911 inc. z w > c) 0. < C;) au) 0 0 �6 0 z � z (0 0 O L) 00 5 LL < 1j) 11 �" F- cn C f ) PROPOSED METRO PCS 1, (E) GLULAM U-) LID 'q COAX ROUTE VIA CABLE BEAM IL TRAY MOUNTED VERTICALLY 0 < TO (E) GLULAM BEAM. PAINT TO MATCH I! to PROPOSED METRO PCs EQUIPMENT/ LEASE AREA LOCATION AT (E) CONIC. COLUMN 1 �71 (E) LANDSCAPING PROPOSED METRO PCS POWER/ TELCO CONDUIT ROUTE IN JOINT TRENCH WITHIN 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT -z' v < (E) LANDSCAPING (E) TREE, TYP. PROPOSED METRO- PCS BORE PIT LOCATION PROPOSED METRO- PCS POWER/TELCO ROUTE VIA BORE WITHIN 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT I ENLARGED PROJECT AREA PLAN (E) GAS VALVE VAULT Michael Wilk Architecture 222 Sutter Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94108 tel: 415.839.9594 fax: 415.362.8911 inc. z w > c) 0. < C;) au) 0 0 �6 0 z � z (0 0 O L) A 4 c. PROJECT NO. SF181608 IDRAWN BY SH CHECKED BY MICHAEL MILK I 1 3 101 /22/071100% ZONING REV.1 z w > c) < < C;) au) z (0 0 W F- L) 00 5 LL < 1j) 11 �" F- cn C f ) w U-) LID 'q IL 0 < 04 A 4 c. PROJECT NO. SF181608 IDRAWN BY SH CHECKED BY MICHAEL MILK I 1 3 101 /22/071100% ZONING REV.1 ------ II _- ----- - ----- - ------- --­----- I Michael Wilk Arck-L-dure PRPOSED 2ND TRAY FOR -------- - ----- SYMMETRY, MOUNTED 222 Sutter Street, Suite 400 VERTICALLY TO (E) GLULAM \T ..... .. .......... San Francisco, CA 94108 BEAM (BELOW). PAINT AND TEXTURE TO MATCH (E) EXTERIOR WALL. ---------- - tel: 415.839.9594 fax: 415.362.8911 z 'El --------- ....... ... - C inc. (E) TREES Uj CIO - - - - - -_----_--- --- ----_---_------- ------- ------------- _1 E LA BEAM GLULAM M (E) GLULAM BEAM (E) CROSS STRUCTURE TO ---- ------- - ----- - -- (E) GRAVEL/ LANDSCAPING 0 PROPOSED METRO PCS PROPOSED M ETRO PCS Cc X UT JA CABLE COAX ROUTE VIA CABLE BE REMOVED & REPLACED WITH NEW CONCEALMENT TRAY MOUNTED CROSS w/PROPOSED METRO VERTICALLY TO (E) PCS TRI-SECTOR ANTENNA CYLINDER CONCEALED WITHIN 7 - - ---------- - ---- - -------- GLULAM BEAM 100 > 10'-6" LEASE AREA Fel (E) RIDGE PROPOSED METRO PCS PROPOSED CONC. SLAB :5 < COAX ROUTE VIA CABLE At I . ......... . ------ ___­ ------ ----- ------ ---- 2'-4j/4" s,( 1,v TRAY MOUNTED VERTICALLY TO (E) ------- GLULAM BEAM (BELOW) II m Ln '_-(E) CONC. L COLUMN .... ... .. . 0 = z 0 0 < z D_ 0 ji 11l 1 PROPOSED W20 Uo ME TER MOUNT ----- ------- -- -- ---------- -- - ------- - ----- ---------- n L, LO 0 D 80 0 ual To (E) CONC. COLUMN (E) ROOF LINE W 0 0 of z I . ... ... . ...... < < 0 LO < < EGR PPC TELCO PPC TELCO tn z 00 L.L y < ---- - ------- - ----- --------- - -- -- --- - 00 Of — SERVICE SERVICE LIGHT LIGHT (E) TREE (E) OAK BUSH 00 < co w LL LL y < 106 2: U) w Lo 0 C14 ANTENNA LAYOUT SCALE: V' 2 10" ­77 v '77 (E) CROSS STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED PROPOSED METRO PCS POWER & TELCO CONDUIT ROUTE IN TRENCH WITHIN 5' WIDE UTILITY I / WITH NEW CONCEALMENT tag 375, CROSS EASEMENT PROJECT N0. SF18160B PROPOSED METRO PCS TRI-SECTOR ANTENNA \ I14 DRAWN BY SH Ur CONCEALED WITHIN NEW MOLDED FRP CROSS AT ICHECKED BY MICHAEL WLK ROOF NO DATE ISSUE 1 01/04/071 90% ZONING L01/12/07 100% ZONING Ij 01 /22/07 100% ZONING REV. > 4 05/02/07100% ZONING REV. -PROPOSED 2ND TRAY FOR SYMMETRY, SYMMETRY, PAINTED AND TEXTURED TEXTURED TO MATCH (E) X EXTERIOR WALL LE < ii PROPOSED METRO PCS COAX VIA CABLE TRAY, MOUNT SHEET TITLE LUCENT 4.0 COMPACT OUTDOOR CABINET TO (E) GLULAM BEAM, & PENETRATE (E) ROOF. PAINTED AND TEXTURED TO MATCH (E) EXTERIOR WALL. ENLARGED PROJECT AREA PLAN ISOMETRIC ANTENNA LAYOUTS CONCEALMENT CROSS SHEET NUMBER -------- A=3 64 CABINET/ CROSS DETAILS I SCALE: I 1 3-1 ENLARGED EQUIPMENT AREA PLAN SCALE: R i N.T.S. 3 /4' :1' -p' 0 6• 1- Micnael Wilk Arckite-dure 222 Sutter Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94108 tel: 415.839.9594 (E) CROSS STRUCTURE TO PROPOSED METRO PCS (E) JOINT POLE/ PROPOSED fax: 415.362.8911 BE REMOVED & REPLACED GPS ANTENNA METRO PCS POWER & TELCO WITH NEW CONCEALMENT P.O.G. inc. CROSS/ PROPOSED METRO - PCS TRI-- SECTOR ANTENNA CYLINDER , u W U _- oz elf _ 3� O D_ U O_ Z � O i- Q � Z (f) z —,.`++ �z •�*-. f', a ""4y S .Y, - - $ --- - -------- .- - - I Q z LL £ O W W w a 00 s u r # �O I _ Ld l- ao # (E) OLIVE �It v % TREES PROPOSED METRO PCS is VERTICAL _ - _ aa _ v `N 1! CABLE MOUNT I AT (E) COLUMN & �I _'Tfi. ----r - --t� -. _ - — - - - ---- - `�j ROUTE ON GLB It ` �_ T r `- it � w SARATOGA SUNNYVALE RD PROPOSED CONC, SLAB PROPOSED METRO PCS m T PROPOSED METRO PCS LUCENT 4.0 COMPACT PPC & TELCO CABINETS MOUNT TO (E) COLUMN I y Im a Q LL.I U CABINET W/ BATTER PLINTH MOUNT ON NEW VIA UNISTRUT O I Q 0T0_ rn O SOUTH ELEVATION SALE: ® = Q U F- �e =r -o 0 4' 8' N LO I LL � I N U) (E) CROSS STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED WITH NEW CONCEALMENT CROSS/ PROPOSED METRO PCS TRI- SECTOR ANTENNA CYLINDER I PROPOSED METRO PCS GPS ANTENNA Uj n N PROPOSED 2ND TRAY FOR SYMMETRY, PAINTED PROPOSED METRO PCS COAX CABLEar U AND TEXTURED 'EXTERIOR TRAY ROUTE ON (E) GLULAM BEAM N o TO MATCH (E) WALLS PAINTED AND TEXTURED TO MATCH ckc' I' 7�hW�y5 (E) EXTERIOR WALLS PROJECT N0. SF181606 ° LJ o ° z O z ° w - - - - w :: - '�i F� ' vyz.5 z� ¢fit c -- _ "'�P . ' S9 �`�ox�`,� '?' a 3 -i �^ DRAWN BY SH CHECKED BY MICHAEL WLK ,-. a a COL o Z w_ Q a U _° - - - q "fit n3 ! N DAY ISSUE w 00 W o 2 _ w - > _ _ % t5 1 01 /04/071 90% ZONING o IL vw W i ° w o w N o - t ' » 4 - Y rlaw f" 2101/12/071 100% ZONING 3 01/22/0711007 ZONING REV. a - 'fie 4 OS 02 07 100% ZONING REV. CL w o - — - 11 -_ LTi a III j II I II II ! I II (E) WALL III Ij I I I IIII I II I I'l il n ;I SHEET TITLE I HERRIMAN AVE PROPOSED CONC. SLAB I PROPOSED METRO PCS PPC & ELEVATIONS PROPOSED METRO PCS TELCO CABINETS MOUNT TO (E) LUCENT 4.0 COMPACT COLUMN VIA UNISTRUT CABINET W/ BATTERY SHEET NUMBER A =4 PLINTH MOUNT ON NEW CONC. SLAB WEST ELEVATION SALE: ®, 2 jig• =1' -0• • • • Item 4 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No. & Location: PDR 07 -003; 14416 Old Wood Road Type of Application: Design Review Applicant/Owner: Pitzen Staff Planner: Heather Bradley, Contract Planner Meeting Date: December 12, 2007 APN: 397 -05 -042 Department Head: John F. Livingstone,' AICP Subject: 14416 Oldwood Road APN: 397 -05 -042 500' Radius NI Lo3 rc tip O w {{rne n.'r 3860 •'� J.Q � 117 . w .� \\ •i Yp k �l 1 I.I01 h. �a Q � 5 52 43 k' L30AC. -4 U3 AC I 1.09 AC l'{ S7 % IS a n zn 2: )b �I 39 S 1 J i 53 j�3LISIAc. ^ -1 i JA� r Z'sy 1.665 AC NET - LN6!C +$()0' 80 to WAS 171175 z Le 1 1{ ! 1 t6 °/ L034. RO.S PCJar/ZP 4 rxluzo wks er. < v 'f j � � 2 ! 1 iN aaeero.r cT, �� �• rl �7 ? / 9J I N.ee...o •P, 1.31 AC. NET .•' J7 a rsrr d Nye ,. ;w 56 I* 5 �v H OLD WDDD 1 s'$ ro a len PCL. 4 1"PTN. PCL. p0•µ ,9s 7c sR �el.s� ct.o .• �►^/ ! 46 AC. NET Q0., rrur rr..w 4B 7 /00 6 PCL.: nCr rrr. tss 7 1.45 , � r iTTOr[ N t _ IlIZ_ IJ _ - 2 _ 3 ypX ' 82 >" ti PCL. D l i �� I roar M , n s? , 1 r Z'sy 1.665 AC NET - LN6!C +$()0' L WAS 171175 z Le 1 1 4 rxluzo wks er. < 4 — '.ors• 2 ISL96 16S '; /Sb bl' 1 1 ~a 1 iN aaeero.r cT, •. �• -4 �i •P, 1.31 AC. NET ;W;A e i L 5 �v PCL. .� 45 : �' PCL: B a len PCL. 4 1"PTN. PCL. PCL.{ .d 2.• r ER 3 9T 11 A L035 G �3 Pa- rYS7� i �'irua {�-- .C. ; - - - - -- ♦o raalo au a 59 1 `1.11 - 77 AC. /�L44 AC. • 47 NET tNCL AC. NET J ' : a h�m rr Jr }� •y 1.27 [� ' •tee $ PCL_2 ^r :o 1.26 +9o:{vW '0 usi� PCL. aA R °"`• - '' « t -° m z ':; t ^ 0.924 ACR' pTN.pCL3 �/ 82.34 _ Y CL 8 :Q 67 x CL.B 1 PCL. C �~ ' ��.ex y g ♦ PCL. A ! .0 \y •/ QPCL r'.91 ACm rf%• ;''F��'t O !L't /�� I :1•(2AC.N 25AC.NET] 1.37AC.NET wwu KfrM O �4 aJ 8 Ar ` N4.1Ayii e •� -__1 /<•iCa7.t Wt {` � 4� e S - ijF , 0.•t.r 6 a I•a' w 1 L. 87 87 S a'iurvzr:zr _ 72 �♦ i116AC `OMtCsr R u Win— -.4r ''fi + ' 14 1.261 AC = 2 v - .. �9° r2) ... _ 1 L A � \ ..�- P. M. 442-M- 41 -r-iC �` RO.J. d♦ rhn... _ �'°' :ills ��` ZI n 14416 Old Wood Road Application No. PDR 07 -0003; 14416 Old Wood Road PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant requests Design Review approval to add a second floor to the existing. single story residence. The addition includes approximately 298 square feet to the existing first floor and a new, approximately, 1,157 square foot second -story to the existing 4,633 square foot single -story residence. The total proposed floor area would be approximately 6,088 square feet. The maximum height of the proposed building will not exceed the 26 -foot height limit. The maximum impervious coverage will not exceed the allowable 35% of the net site area. The lot size is approximately 45,564 square feet, and the site is located in the R -1- 40,000 zoning district. Design Review approval is required pursuant to Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.060. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 0 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve this Design Review application by adopting the attached Resolution with conditions. Staff is not recommending any permanent conditions of approval for this project. • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY Application filed: 07/06/07 Application complete: 11/13/07 Notice published: 11/28/07 Mailing completed: 11/23/07 Posting completed: 12/06/07 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant requests Design Review approval to add a second floor to the existing. single story residence. The addition includes approximately 298 square feet to the existing first floor and a new, approximately, 1,157 square foot second -story to the existing 4,633 square foot single -story residence. The total proposed floor area would be approximately 6,088 square feet. The maximum height of the proposed building will not exceed the 26 -foot height limit. The maximum impervious coverage will not exceed the allowable 35% of the net site area. The lot size is approximately 45,564 square feet, and the site is located in the R -1- 40,000 zoning district. Design Review approval is required pursuant to Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.060. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 0 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve this Design Review application by adopting the attached Resolution with conditions. Staff is not recommending any permanent conditions of approval for this project. • Application No. PDR 07 -0003; 14416 Old Wood Road PROJECT DATA ZONING: R-1-40,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: RVLD (Residential Very Low Density) MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE: Approximately 45,564 gross and net square feet AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: Approximately 4.2% GRADING REQUIRED: None ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed single - family residence is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 (c) New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single - family dwellings. PROPOSED EXTERIOR MATERIALS AND COLORS The proposed colors include beige and off -white stucco walls with dark beige trim and olive green shutters. Materials include stone veneer columns and tower element, brick porch, rough sawn lumber half - timbers, and a slate -type roof in a dark gray palette. Other features include metal and wrought iron details such as "cresting" along the peak of the roof, finials at the peak of the tower features, a decorative weather vane and decorative chimney caps. A color and material board will be available at the public hearing. • Application No. PDR 07 -0003; 14416 Old Wood Road PROJECT DATA PROJECT DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting Design Review approval to add a second story to their existing one - story home. The existing residence and pool will remain. Project Design Characteristics The, proposed addition and remodel is in a Tudor style with a stucco exterior with half - timbers in rough -sawn lumber, slate -style roof,. stone veneer, decorative metal details and a small balcony off the master bedroom. Correspondence and Neighbor Review Staff has received two Neighbor Notification forms from the neighboring property owners directly to the south, and directly to the east of this property. No neighbors have submitted any correspondence in opposition to this project. The applicant has made several attempts to contact other neighbors and obtain the Neighbor Notification forms, but to date has only received two. • • Proposal Code Requirements Site Coverage Residence 5,195 sq. ft. Maximum Allowable: Driveway/Walks 4,030 sq. ft. 35 % = 15,947 sq. ft. Pool/Patio' 3,896 sq. ft. max. TOTAL 13,121 sq. ft. (37.7 %) Floor Area Existing + Proposed = Total First Floor 3,873 + 554 = 4,427 s.f. Second Floor 0 + 1,157= 1,157 s.f. Garage 760 (256) = 504 s.f. TOTAL 6,088 sq. ft. 6,120 sq. ft. Setbacks First - Second First - Second Front yard 59 ft - 59 ft. 30 ft. — 30 ft. Rear Yard 79 ft. — 79 ft. 20 ft. — 20 ft. Right (exterior) Side 58 ft. — 58 ft. 25 ft. — 30 ft. Left Side 20 ft. — 83 ft. 20 ft. — 25 ft. Height in feet Lowest elevation 317.19 ft. Maximum height = Highest elevation 317.34 ft. 343.26 ft. elevation (26 Average Elevation 317.26 ft. ft.) Topmost elevation 343.26 ft. Maximum height 26.0 ft. PROJECT DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting Design Review approval to add a second story to their existing one - story home. The existing residence and pool will remain. Project Design Characteristics The, proposed addition and remodel is in a Tudor style with a stucco exterior with half - timbers in rough -sawn lumber, slate -style roof,. stone veneer, decorative metal details and a small balcony off the master bedroom. Correspondence and Neighbor Review Staff has received two Neighbor Notification forms from the neighboring property owners directly to the south, and directly to the east of this property. No neighbors have submitted any correspondence in opposition to this project. The applicant has made several attempts to contact other neighbors and obtain the Neighbor Notification forms, but to date has only received two. • • Application No. PDR 07 -0003; 14416 Old Wood Road Fencing. The existing rear yard fence will be replaced with a privacy fence not to exceed six feet in height and will not be located in the exterior side or front yard setback area. Geotechnical/Grading The project will require minimal grading. No geotechnical review is required. Arborist Review /Trees There are 25 trees on this property and neighboring properties that could potentially be impacted during the construction process. One tree, an American Sweetgum is proposed for removal to accommodate the addition. This tree is valued at $1,440 and will be replaced on site with trees equal to the full value. Another tree, a Southern Magnolia is in the way of the proposed front walkway. Staff has conditioned the project to redesign the front walkway in order to preserve the Southern Magnolia. No other ordinance - protected trees would be directly impacted by the proposed project, as the addition is mostly limited to the existing footprint. All recommendations of the City Arborist have been incorporated as conditions of approval within the attached Resolution. Landscaping An extensive landscape plan has been submitted which includes a grouping of redwood trees at the southern property line, flowering ornamental trees, shrubs and groundcovers. Staff has included a condition in the Resolution that landscaping in the front and exterior side yard shall be installed prior to final building permit for the house. Green. Building Techniques The applicant has submitted a list of materials, systems, and design strategies that will be utilized in the construction of the addition. They include but are not limited to the following: orientation for maximum benefit of sun, trellis overhangs for shade, controlled water efficient irrigation system, Energy Star appliances, natural gas water heater and range, LowE double pane dual glazed windows, water saving toilets, and an energy efficient furnace with zone heating and cooling system. In addition the applicant intends to retain 50% or more of the original house, which will produce less waste than a complete demolition. GENERAL PLAN FINDINGS The approval of the proposed project would be consistent with the following General Plan Goals and Policies as discussed below: • Conservation Element Policy 6.0 — Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. The project will utilize Earthtone colors and materials that will blend with the overall appearance of the Application No. PDR 07 -0003; 14416 Old Wood Road site. Mature landscaping will be retained as part of the project and substantial setbacks and additional landscaping will help to screen the addition from neighboring properties and the street. The proposal has elements such a stone veneer, rough -sawn timbers, and metal details that provides interest to the fagade and promotes the rural atmosphere of Saratoga. • Land Use Element Policy 5.0 — The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned the. application meets the Findings required for Design Review Approval. Design Review Findings The proposed project is consistent with all the following Design Review findings stated in City Code Section 15- 45.080: a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The project meets this finding in that most of the existing landscape screening will be retained as part of this project. The proposed addition keeps the home in the existing location, situated with substantial setbacks and consideration is given to the neighbor's views and privacy through window placement, and additional landscaping. b) Preserve Natural Landscape. The project meets this finding in that no grading or topographical changes are proposed for this project and all but one of the mature trees on the site will remain. All preserved trees will be protected with fencing during the construction process, and many new native and/drought tolerant trees and shrubs will be planted on site. . c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. The project is consistent with this finding in that no heritage trees will be removed, and all trees on site will be adequately protected during the construction process with tree. fencing and only one non - native tree will be removed. d) Minimize the. perception of excessive bulk. The project meets this finding in that the architectural massing and style of the home will reduce the overall appearance of bulk. Additionally decorative elements, materials and a varied roofline will create interest and add detail to the fagades. e) Compatible bulk and height. The project meets-this finding in that the proposed home is compatible in terms of size. and height to other homes in the neighborhood. The proposed home will be constructed of quality materials and will be in keeping with other two -story homes in the surrounding neighborhood. . f) Current grading and erosion control methods. The project meets this finding in that the proposed home would conform to the City's current grading and erosion control methods. The applicant is required to maintain stormwater on site where feasible. g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above. The project has taken energy efficiency into account, preserves the neighbor's Application No. PDR 07 -0003; 14416 Old Wood Road privacy by proposing substantial setbacks from the side and rear property lines, and proposes extensive new landscaping. CONCLUSION Staff finds that all of the Design Review findings can be made in the affirmative and the proposal is consistent with the General Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the Design Review application by adopting the attached Resolution. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution of Approval — Design Review 2. Neighbor Notification forms 3. Arborist Report dated August 15, 2007 4. Green Building Strategies .5. Design Review findings submitted by applicant 6. City of Saratoga Notice, Noticing Affidavit, and Noticing Labels 7. Photos of neighboring homes 8. Applicant's Plans, Exhibit "A" • • ATTACHMENT 1 � r11 Application No. PDR 07 -0003; 14416 Old Wood Road RESOLUTION NO. Application No. PDR07 -0003 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Pitzen; 14416 Old Wood Road Approval of a second -story addition to an existing one -story residence with attached garage WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review approval to construct a second story addition resulting in a 6,088 square foot residence. The residence will not be more that 26 ft. in height and will be situated on a 45,564 square foot lot located at 14416 Old Wood Road, which is located in the R -1- 40,000 district; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, the project, which proposes construction of a second story addition to an existing single - family residence is Categorically exempt from the Environmental Quality'Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303(c) New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. This exemption allows for construction of a single family home in an urban area; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for design review approval, and the following findings specified in the Saratoga General Plan have been determined: a) Conservation Element Policy 6.0 — Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. The project will utilize Earthtone colors and materials that will blend with the overall appearance of the site. Mature landscaping will be retained as part of the project and substantial setbacks and additional landscaping will help to screen the addition from neighboring properties and the street. The proposal has elements such a stone veneer, rough -sawn timbers, and metal details that provides interest to the fagade and promotes the rural atmosphere of Saratoga. b) Land Use Element Policy 5.0 — The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction .and major additions thereto are compatible with the site . and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned the application meets the Findings required for Design Review Approval. WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for design review approval, and the following findings specified in Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.080 and the City's Residential Design Handbook have been determined: Application No. PDR 07 -0003; 14416 Old Wood Road NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The project meets this finding in that most of the existing landscape screening will be retained as part of this project. The proposed addition keeps the home in the existing location, situated with substantial setbacks and consideration is given to the neighbor's views and privacy through window placement, and additional landscaping. b) Preserve Natural Landscape. The project meets this finding in that no grading or topographical changes are proposed for this project and all but one of the mature trees on the site will remain. All preserved trees will be protected with fencing during the construction process, and many new native and/drought tolerant trees and shrubs will be planted on site. c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. The project is consistent with this finding in that no heritage trees will be removed, and all trees on site will be adequately protected during the construction process with tree fencing and only one non - native tree will be removed. d) Minimize the perception of excessive bulk. The project meets this finding in that the architectural massing and style of the home will reduce the overall, appearance of bulk. Additionally decorative elements, materials and a varied roofline will create interest and add detail to the facades. e) Compatible bulk and height. The project meets this finding in that the proposed home is compatible in terms of size and height to other homes in the neighborhood. The proposed home will be constructed of quality materials and will be in keeping with other two -story homes in the surrounding neighborhood. fJ Current grading and erosion control methods. The project meets this finding in that the proposed home would conform to the City's current grading and erosion control methods. The applicant is required to maintain stormwater on site where feasible. g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above. The project has 'taken energy efficiency into account, preserves the neighbor's privacy by proposing substantial setbacks from the side and rear property lines, and _ proposes extensive new landscaping. Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, application number PDR07 -0003 for Design Review approval is hereby granted subject to. the following conditions: PERMANENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL There are no permanent conditions of approval for this project. Application No. PDR 07 -0003; 14416 Old Wood Road a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. The proposed home shall be located and constructed as shown on "Exhibit A" (incorporated by reference, date stamped October 4, 2007) except that the front walkway shall be redesigned to maintain eight (8) feet from the Southern Magnolia designated as tree # 4 in the City Arborist Report, and in compliance with the conditions stated in this Resolution. 2. Any proposed changes - including but not limited to fagade design and materials — to the approved plans shall be submitted in writing with a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. No downgrading in the exterior appearance of the approved residence will be approved by staff. Downgrades may include but are not limited to garage doors, architectural detailing, stonework, columns, shutters, driveway materials, etc. Proposed changes to the approved plans are subject to the approval of the Community Development Director and may require review by the Planning Commission. 3. The project shall use materials and colors as illustrated on the Finish Materials Board dated stamped July 6, 2007. 4. Four sets of complete construction plans incorporating this Resolution as a separate plan page shall be submitted to the Building Division. 5. The site plan shall contain a note with the following language: "Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the LLS of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per the approved plans." 6. Landscape plan shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff, promote surface infiltration and minimize use of fertilizers and pesticides that can contribute to water pollution. 7. To the extent feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. 8. To the extent feasible, pest resistant landscaping plants shall be used throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape areas. 9. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. 10. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover, if applicable, shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. • 11. Landscaping along both street frontages shall be installed prior to final occupancy inspection. A landscape bond may be submitted along with the applicable filing fee in lieu of this requirement. Application No. PDR .07 -0003; 14416 Old Wood Road 12. A storm water retention plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval demonstrating how all storm water will be retained on -site, and incorporating the New Development and Construction - Best Management Practices on file with the City. If all storm water cannot be detained on -site due to topographic, soils or other constraints, an explanatory note shall be provided on the Approved Plans and subject to prior City review and approval. Storm water runoff from the project site (if any after compliance with this paragraph) shall not be directed toward the adjacent properties. 13. A11 processing fees, in the form of deposit accounts on file with the Community Development Department, shall be reconciled with a minimum of $500 surplus balance at all times. In the event that the balance is less than $500, all staff work on the project shall cease until the balance is restored to a minimum of $500. CITY ARBORIST 8. All recommendations of.the Arborist Report dated August 15, 2007, and incorporated herein by this reference shall be followed and incorporated into the plans. 9. Tree protective measures, as specified by the City Arborist, shall be installed and inspected by Staff prior to issuance of City Permits. 10. Prior to issuance of Building'Permits the applicant shall obtain a tree bond, or similar funding mechanism as approved by the Community Development Director, in the amount of $159,725 to guarantee the maintenance and preservation of trees. 11. The City Arborist shall inspect the site to verify compliance with tree protective measures. The bond shall be released after, the planting of required replacement trees, a favorable .site inspection by the City Arborist, and payment of any outstanding Arborist fees. PUBLIC WORKS 12. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Public Works Department as necessary. FIRE DEPARTMENT 13. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Santa Clara County Fire Department. CITY ATTORNEY 14. Owner and Applicant shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its employees, agents, independent contractors and volunteers (collectively "City") from any and all costs and expenses, including but not limited to attorney's fees incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal. Court, challenging the City's action with respect. to the applicant's project or contesting any action or inaction in the City's processing and/or approval of the subject application. . Application No. PDR 07 -0003; 14416 Old Wood Road Section 2. Construction must be commenced within 36 months or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15 -90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 12th day of December 2007 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 0' Joyce Hlava, Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: John F. Livingstone, AICP, Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner Date • ATTACHMENT 2 � • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 1,40 w Dear Neighbor, 1 am.proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity. to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors. and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of. Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review 'the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and -speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: 64te: Signature: Neighbor Address: Neighbor Phone If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: U.A y i CL -{� 1-L 7 -f= N Date: 0 Application Number: City of Saratoga Revised 10129106 P:IForms & Procedures Ineighbor notification. doc Planning Department PnKmu 1h, 'gPold(mom NOTES .1 =E A.1 SCOPE OF WORK AON A a T 9 A - O�w c3 U a4 bn ,0 co C) 'u- 0 W Y_ �_ OHM) v 11-1 "A" '"All. �R WD(MNM, p MOD =­ A ­ 41 ON TOT4L I- -E I­ A— S.F. :A" T__ T� 4, MIWAM, —M T,7TAIIS A- M 1111 1,1 �311� 5—LC 1­1 RM I-IT IN -T ­E E 37% PE R A. WEN, —T- -.T —T GRADE AT 11-1 IM POINT OF ­'GR­ e-5 ml, 42L A ZA A= A= RAN a T 9 A - O�w c3 U a4 bn ,0 co C) 'u- 0 W Y_ �_ City of Saratoga Neigbbor Notification Form y o��u�U D PROJECT ADDRESS: t u� JUL U b 2007 Dear Neighbor, CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I am.proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors. and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at'any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of. Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review 'the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary of Saratoga at 08- 8681222 and -speak with the the project, you may contact City g assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor N e: A� ` �` ° Date: Signatur Neighbor Address: Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Date: Application Number: City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 P: lForms & Procedureslneighbor notification. doc f. r _r,.. �.. _ , Rib .t PACIFIC DIVERSIFIED COMPANY, INC. RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION March 26, 2007 Dear Neighbor, D F NOV 2 g M/ CITY Or z%,:. COMMUNITY DEi %rv, �} r Thanks again for taking the time to review Dave's plans. This is an initial submittal to the planning department, when the set the planning commission date we will let you know. Once we have some feedback from the city we will have an idea of our time line and we will keep you in the loop. If you are comfortable with the plans please complete and sign the enclosed Neighbor Notification Form AND sign the first page to the actual plans (this. is a new city requirement), you and leave the package under Dave's door mat. Please do not hesitate to call with any questions or concerns. Below is contact information: Veronica Pruitt Vpruitt(!i pdci.com Work: 408- 296 -7800 Cell: 408 -348 -7787 David Pitzen Davep:'a).pdci.com Work: 408- 296 -7800 1224 Lincoln Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125 • Office: 408 - 279 -6625 • Fax: 408 - 279 -1244 e-mail: PacDiv @pdci.com LIC.# 580705 -B • • • • • PACIFIC DIVERSIFIED COMPANY, INC, RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION Neighbor Notification ONE %= -_.,.. I� =1 NOV 2 g aut CITY Or COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN: Numerous attempts were made to obtain neighbor notifications for the project at 14416 Oldwood Road. Several days in March I personally went to neighbors' doors with no success. I then followed up with phone calls to make appointments to leave plans. I was able to meet with the Formicos and obtain approval. In April I met with 14415 Oldwood Road and left plans and the neighborhood notification form. I also left an envelope with plans and notification form for the Blakes. I followed up with phone call reminders to return plans and contact us with questions. The Blakes returned the package and approval form to David Pitzen in late October. Early this week we sent plans and notification forms to 14415 Oldwood Road, 14403 and 14425 Sobey Road via certified mail. Sincerely, �/� J Veronica Pruitt enclosures 1224 Lincoln Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125 • Office: 408 - 279 -6625 • Fax: 408 - 279 -1244 • e -mail: PacDiv@pdci.com LIC.# 580705 -B • ATTACHMENT 3 � • • • Community Development Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, Califomia 95070 is 14416 Old Wood Road Application #: ARB07 -0005 ARBORIST REPORT August 15, 2007 APN 397 -05 -042 Prepared by Kate. Bear, City Arborist Owner: David Pitzen Phone (408) 868 -,1276 INTRODUCTION The property owner of 14416 Old Wood Road has submitted plans to the city to remodel their home. They will be adding a second story, remodel the ground floor, convert one of the garage bays to a carport and landscape the property. Twenty -five trees protected by City ordinance and potentially impacted by construction were inventoried . for this report. Each tree has been marked with a numbered aluminum tag for ease of identification. Data for each tree is included in a Tree Inventory Table at the end of this report. Tree locations are marked on the attached copy of the Site Plan. Plans reviewed for this report include Sheet 1, Cover Sheet, dated February 14, 2007 by House of Haws, Inc., Sheet C1, Site Plan, dated May 3, 2007 by Carroll Engineering. and Sheets L -1 and L -2, Conceptual Landscape Plan, dated February 14, 2007 by Terri Ravel Kane, Landscape Architect. SITE OBSERVATIONS, PLAN REVIEW AND TECHNICAL DISCUSSION Twenty -five trees are potentially impacted by construction. They include one black walnut ( #1), seven coast live oaks ( #2, 17 — 20, 23 and 24), three magnolias ( #4 — 6), one American sweetgum ( #6), ten Monterey pines ( #7 — 16), one Mexican fan palms ( #22), two valley oaks ( #21 and 25), and one willow ( #26). The plans do not show any trees to be removed, although trees #4 and 6 are in conflict with the design and will probably not survive construction. The pathway to the front door is right next to Magnolia #4 and the tree cannot be retained with the path in this location. I recommend redesigning the walkway so that it remains at least eight feet from the trunk of the tree. It is acceptable to remove and replace tree #6, an American sweetgum, with a new tree that better suits the site in a more appropriate location following construction. Its appraised value is $1,440. Mitigation can be achieved by planting one 36 inch box tree. No elevation drawings for the current house are provided and the proposed house is 26 feet in height at the garage and carport. This may extend into the canopy of oak tree #25. If that is the case, I recommend reducing the height of the garage and carport to accommodate the tree limbs rather than pruning the tree to allow the increased height for the carport. *A number of trees are not shown on the landscape design but are not shown to be removed on any of the plan sheets. This should be clarified. They include black walnut tree #1, oak tree #2, magnolia trees 43 — 5, palm tree #22, and oak tree #23. The landscape plan does show the pines to be retained. These pines are Page 1 of 3 • 14416 Old Wood Road in fair to poor health and do not serve the site very well. If new screening trees were desired along Sobey Road, it would be appropriate to remove and replace the pines as part of this project. If the owners decide to do this, it should be reflected in revised plans. A deck is proposed around oak trees #20 and 21 and extends over the bank of Sobey Creek. No excavation for piers for the deck may occur within 15 feet of tree #21 or within six feet of tree #20. The owners may need a permit from the Santa Clara Valley Water District to construct the deck, and they should find this out prior to proceeding. The owners or architect may wish to review the design guidelines for around creeks at the following website listed for the SCVWD: http' / /www.vallevwater-org/Water/Watersheds - streams and floods /Taken care of streams/ Guidelines & standards /Guidelines & Standards.shtm No grading, drainage or utility plans are included, and should be included in revised plans. Information on utility locations and trenching to install them is necessary for evaluation of impacts to trees. Utilities include electrical, drainage, water, sewer, gas lines and irrigation for landscaping. Per City Ordinance 15- 50.080, a bond amount equal to 100% of the total appraised value of all trees to be retained is required. Once the design has been finalized and the number of trees to be retained has been determined, a bond amount will be calculated. Appraisal values are calculated according to the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9`h Edition, published by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), 2000. RECOMMENDATIONS report, including the Tree Inventory Table and the map showing tree locations and 1. This entire rep g protective fencing, shall be incorporated into the set of final building plans. 2. Tree protective fencing shall be installed as shown on the attached map and established prior to any grading or the arrival of construction equipment or materials on site. It shall be comprised of six -foot high chain link fencing mounted on eight -foot tall, two -inch diameter galvanized posts, driven 24 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. Tree protective fencing shall be inspected and, approved by the City Arborist prior to obtaining building division permits. 3. Plans shall number trees according to information provided in this report. Trees shall be clearly designated to be retained or removed. 4. Front pathway shall be relocated to retain Magnolia tree #4 and remain at least 8 feet from its trunk. 5. If the carport and garage impact limbs from the neighbors oak tree ( #25), they shall be redesigned so that they are not as high and the tree does not require pruning. 6. No excavation for construction of the deck shall occur within 15 feet of oak tree #21 or within 6 feet of oak tree #20. 7. Any permits required by the Santa Clara Valley Water District for construction of the deck around adjacent to Sobey Creek, shall be obtained prior to issuance of the building division permit. Page 2 of 3 14416 Old Wood Road • 8. Plans shall show locations for all utilities that require trenching for this project, including electrical, drainage, water, sewer and gas. lines and trenching associated with their installation. 9. Owner shall provide a tree protection bond prior to obtaining building division permits. The bond amount will be determined once the trees to be retained and removed have been finalized. 10. Replacement trees are required for any tree that is removed during the project. Replacement trees equal to the appraised value of the removed tree are required. The values for replacement trees can be found at the bottom of the Tree Inventory Table. Once the design has been finalized, a total replacement value for trees will be determined. 11. City Arborist shall approve any grading or trenching under a tree's canopy prior to performing work. If approved, it shall be done manually using shovels. Any roots measuring two inches or larger shall be retained and tunneled under; roots measuring less than two inches may be cut with a sharp pruning instrument. 12. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the designated fenced area (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: demolition, grading, trenching, equipment cleaning, stockpiling and dumping materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 13. Any pruning of trees on site must be performed under the supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. 14. The disposal of harmful products, including but not limited to chemicals, paint rinse water, fuel, cement rinse water, herbicides, or other materials, is prohibited beneath tree canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath tree canopies. 15. Landscape plans should be designed as follows: a. Design irrigation so that valve boxes, controllers and main and lateral lines remain outside of tree canopies. b. Select plants with similar water requirements to the trees under which they will be placed. c. Design irrigation lines so that trenching remains outside of tree canopies. d. Design lawns so that they remain at least two feet from the trunk of existing trees or one foot from a newly planted tree. e. Do not install lawn underneath oak trees. f. Under oak trees it is acceptable to install plants that are compatible with oaks in the outer half of the area under the canopy. They should be watered using drip irrigation that is laid on top of grade under mulch. g. Design topdressings so that stones or mulch remain at least one foot from the trunks of retained trees. h. Do not allow tilling or stripping of the topsoil beneath the trees' canopies. i. Establish edging material proposed beneath the trees' canopies on top of existing soil grade using stakes. Attachments: Tree Inventory Table Map Showing Tree Protective Fencing Locations Page 3 of 3 ' • TABLE • TREE INVENTORY TREE NO. 1 2. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Black walnut O l h 21.7 25 .70 60 Good Moderate 3 Coast live oak Quercus a ry olia 18.5 25 80 80 Good High 3 Southern magnolia Wa nolia randy ora c 20 0 �o o Good High 3 Southern magnolia tea' b c II II U �o 0= 70 3 0 1 Southern magnolia 9.6, da nolia randy ora 10.9 25 80 60 d High = U It bA o on ti v) fd a auidambarstyracfflua 10.5 Y^ w � x X y O x y II U 4) S A �+ o z v ° o a s a ¢ TREE NAME E c7 Low 5 W -0 Black walnut Ju lans hindsii 21.7 25 .70 60 Good Moderate 3 Coast live oak Quercus a ry olia 18.5 25 80 80 Good High 3 Southern magnolia Wa nolia randy ora 15.2 20 80 70 Good High 3 Southern magnolia J a nolia grandifloia 14.8 15 80 70 Good High 1 Southern magnolia 9.6, da nolia randy ora 10.9 25 80 60 Good High 3 American sweetgum auidambarstyracfflua 10.5 15 80 60 Good •Moderate 1 Monterey pine Pinus radiata 14.3 25 40 40 Fair Low 5 Monterey pine Pinus radiata 13.8 15 40 40 Fair Low 5 Monterey pine Pinus radiata 13.2 15 20 20 Poor Low 5 Monterey pine Pinus radiata 11.8 15 40 40 Fair Low 5 Monterey pine Pinus radiata . 18.7 25 50 50 Good Moderate 5 Monterey pine Pinus radiata 13.8 10 40 30 Fair Low .5 Monterey pine Pinus radiata 19.3 20 40 30 Fair Low 5 Monterey pine Pinus radiata. 16.6 20 50 50 Fair Moderate 5 Monterey pine Pinus radiata 14.4 20 40 40 Fair Moderate 5 Monterey pine Pinus radiata ] 9.8 25 40 40 Fair Moderate 5 Coast live oak, 8, n,,vrry,c nvrifnlia 16.1 25 80 80 Good Hieh 4 X $4,050 X $6,500 740 x $4,500 $4,710 x $1,440 $480 $450 $190 $300 $1,170 $350 $720 $850 $500 $640 X $7 ;40C Address: August 15, 2007 14416 Old Wood Road 0 OrREE INVENTORY TABLE • Total Appraised Value $159,725 Replacement Tree Values 15 gallon = $150 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 48 inch box = $5,000 52 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 Should any tree listed above become damaged owner will be required to repair the damage. Should any tree listed above be removed owner will be required to replace that tree with trees equal in value to its assessed value. • Address: August 15, 2007 14416 Old Wood Road Coast live oak 12.6, 18 Quercus a ri olia 14.6 30 80 80 Good High 4 $8,70D r Coast live oak 19 Quercus a ri olia 14.1 30 80 80 Good High 4 $4,190 Coast live oak 20 Quercus a ri olia 8.4 15 80 70 Good High 2 $970 Valley oak 21 Quercus lobata 40 40 80 80 Good High 2 $55,300 Mexican fan palm 22. Washin tonia mexicana 20.4 10 90 90 Good Moderate 3 -$625 Coast live oak 23 Quercus a ri olia 9 15 80 70 Good High 2 $1,670 Coast live oak 24 Quercus a ri olia 25.9 45 80 90 Good High 3 X X $14,800 Valley oak 25 Quercus lobata 29.1 40 80 90 Good High 3 1 X X 1 $34,100 Willow 6.9, 26 Salix lasiandra 8.8 25 50 10 Good Low 3 1 X X $380 Total Appraised Value $159,725 Replacement Tree Values 15 gallon = $150 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 48 inch box = $5,000 52 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 Should any tree listed above become damaged owner will be required to repair the damage. Should any tree listed above be removed owner will be required to replace that tree with trees equal in value to its assessed value. • Address: August 15, 2007 14416 Old Wood Road • N �1 N N CS Co (7 Q b O I b � z I >� 1W I ± I H� M t� O ol E- CURB w y J- n 7y P.l. AtiDS SE. R 20. ' 16'0 :w . iCTN N C11. r L> t• i I i t II � tt �~ air rN; / r� � ATTACHMENT 4 • . . V Z'.�`�*. NOV 2 g zuuf PACIFIC DIVERSIFIED COMPANY, INC. COMMUNITY DEVELOP;, RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION This project incorporates many energy saving details and conservation techniques for natural and sustainable resources some are highlighted below: Our site design for maximum benefit of sun and wind garage located along the north elevation. Trellis and overhangs to provide shade. Carefully selected landscape design utilizing sensor controlled efficient landscape lighting as well as timer controlled water efficient irrigation system will be set to operate in off -peak hours. The home incorporates energy- saving devices into the design, such as a complete package of Energy StarO appliances, natural gas water heater and range. Dramatic custom selected LowE double pane dual glazed windows throughout Water saving Kohler0 designed toilets and 75 gallon water heater with insulated hot water pipes. Energy efficient furnaces with automatic set back thermostats and zone heating and cooling system. • • 1224 Lincoln Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125 • Office: 408 - 279 -6625 • Fax: 408 - 279 -1244 • e -mail: PacDiv@pdci.com LIC. #580705 -B • 0 1 ATTACHMENT 5 i i.,►. PACIFIC DIVERSIFIED COMPANY, INC, RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION D NOV 2 g [UUi CITY OF IShrw i UGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN From the beginning design stages, our project has endeavored to incorporate the values called out in the City of Saratoga Residential Design Guidelines. Below are details of how we are preserving and enhancing the community: Policy #1 Minimize the perception of bulk One of our design goals with this home is to ensure the maximum integration of the structure with the natural and built environment. .Technique # 1: Minimize changes to natural topography. The property is situated in a valley with a bordering creek, these elements create a very high water table and this factor was considered when deciding not to build below grade. The project will be constructed at grade with minimal grading required and the spoils of the grading have been incorporated into the landscape design. Technique # 3: 1 materials and colors to reduce bulk. The elevation, incorporates different natural materials breaking the expanses and creating horizontal proportions. The masonry stone, brick complement the exposed half timbers and manufactured slate roofing. The unique roof line uses varied roof heights and materials to further break up expanses. Technique 45: Design structure to fit with existing neighborhood. Notice our design in relation to its surroundings. the property is situated at one of the lowest points of elevation in the neighborhood. Surrounding homes primarily consist of structures with 2 stories above grade. Policy #2 Integrate structures with environment Our elevation and site design help to preserve the unique environmental qualities of Saratoga. Note the overall decrease of impervious materials due to the elimination of a circular driveway and installation of a paver driveway. Technique # 1: Use natural materials and colors. We took great care to select a color palette to compliment the natural surroundings. Our earth tones and natural materials such as stone walking paths help blend the structure with the terrain. We have selected natural materials on our elevation and in our. landscaping. note all the walking paths Technique 43: Use Landscaping: to blend structure with environment Our landscape design preserves much of the existing vegetation which will be protected during construction by approved protective areas. The addition of carefully selected plantings will replace large open dirt area. This will eliminate the fire danger of weed growth and need for annual rototilling. We plan to utilize our dirt spoils generated in construction with our landscape design. Technique #5 Blend roof and parking structures with environment. Natural Slate: in earth tone blend will blend with natural surroundings. 1224 Lincoln Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125 • Office: 408 - 279 -6625 • Fax: 408 - 279 -1244 • e -mail: PacDiv@pdci.com LIC.# 580705 -B • • • The replacement of the large circular driveway made of concrete with a smaller paver driveway will not only result in a reduction of impervious coverage but also help integrate the site with the natural surroundings. Note also, the reduction in garage square footage. Technique #6 Integrate fences and walls with structures and setting. Minimal fencing is proposed with the new landscape design Policy 43 Avoid Interference with privacy Our design preserves privacy, a key ingredient in the quality of life in Saratoga. Technique #1: Control view to adjacent properties. Our design has minimal second story windows. The bedrooms on the upper floor have windows oriented toward the street. The only balcony is located on the west wing with the view angle limited to the pool and yard of the same residence. Technique #5: Control exterior light sources. Landscape design incorporates soft low lighting near ground level. Lighting will be oriented to provide safe exposure of surfaces without intense lighting. Policy #5 Design for Energy Efficiency Technique #1: Design for maximum benefit of sun and wind. Garage located along the north elevation. Trellis and overhangs to provide shade. Technique #4: Incorporate energy- saving devices into the design. All installed appliances will be Energy Star® Dramatic custom selected LowE double pane dual glazed windows throughout Water saving Kohler® designed toilets 75 gallon water heater with insulated hot water pipes Attic ventilation Energy efficient furnaces with automatic set back thermostats Zone heating and cooling system Natural gas water heater and range Weather stripped exterior doors Sensor controlled efficient landscape lighting Timer control, water efficient irrigation system will be set to operate in off -peak hours • • ATTACHMENT 6 � • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, Denise Kaspar , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the 23rd day of November , 2007, that I deposited 36 notices in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid; addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to -wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15- 45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property described as: Address: 14416 OLD WOOD RD APN: 397 -05 -042 that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. 1 Denise Kaspar it Advanced Listing Services 11 !0- Nov -07 ;00' Ownership Listing ?repared for: ;97 -05 -042 3AVID H & JENNIFER PITZEN 14416 OLD WOOD RD ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -5633 397 -03 -004 397 -03 7005 397 -03 -012 BFFREY M & PRISCILLA HO THINH TRAN VINAY KHANNA 12790 WOODMONT DR OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -3815 14341 SOBEY RD 14451 SOBEY RD. SARATOGA CA 95070 -5675 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5607 597 -03 -039 397 -03 -045 397 -03 -046 )AVID & LEE REED RAYMOND K & NATHA OSTBY JOHN A CHMIEL )R CURRENT OWNER PO BOX 2474 OR CURRENT OWNER 18801 TEN ACRES RD 14469 OMEGA LN ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -5638 SARATOGA CA 95070 -0474 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5655 >97 -03 -056 397 -03 -057 397 -03 -058 -OHN R & PHYLLIS FEEMSTER' JAVAD & MITRA ASHJAY RUSSELL T & MAUREEN SCHNEIDER )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT. OWNER .8800 TEN ACRES RD 14403 SOBEY RD 14425 SOBEY RD ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -5664 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5607 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5607 ;97 -03 -059 397 -03 -085 397 -04 -026 CIMOTHY & CAROL CORCORAN DAVID R DEMARIA MARTIN A & LINDA FORMICO )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER .4437 SOBEY RD 14482 EMERALD HILLS CT 14456 SOBEY RD ; ARATOGA CA 95670 -5607 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5673 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5609 597 -04 -054 397 -04 -055 397 -04- 091,092 UCHARD H & CAROL FORTE AKASHA NOELLE GORDON E DAVIS )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR.CURRENT OWNER :4474 SOBEY RD 14470 SOBEY RD 14466 SOBEY RD ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -5609 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5609 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5609 )97-05 -042 397 -05 -043 397 -05 -044 )AVID H & JENNIFER PITZEN R & M BLAKE LORETTA HILLIG )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER .4416 OLD WOOD RD 14394 OLD WOOD RD 14372 OLD WOOD RD ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -5633 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5633 SARATOGA CA 95070 75633 ;97 -05 -045 397 -05 -046 397 -05 -048 VIARIO N & MYRIAM CORDERO DONALD W & DALE BOYLE ALI ALKORAISHI )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER PO BOX 700400 4358 CORDWOOD CT 14336 CORDWOOD CT SAN JOSE CA 95170 -0400 ;ARATQGA CA 95070 -5628 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5628 ;97 -05 -052 397 -05 -053 397 -05 -054 3EMMA FALCOCCHIA SAIID & MAHNAZ SHAHABI VITO A & BETTYJANE DIMUCCI )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER .4275 OLD WOOD RD 14307 OLD WOOD RD 14343 OLD WOOD RD ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -5631 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5631 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5631 39.7 -05 -055 1 QUARTERS INV CO :)R CURRENT OWNER OLD WOOD RD TOGA CA 95070 -5631 497 -05 -058 HALTER E DONOVAN )R CURRENT OWNER .4226 SOBEY RD > ARATOGA CA 95070 -5606 +97 -05 -087 >TEPHEN MOORRE )R CURRENT OWNER .8691 VESSING RD > ARATOGA CA 95070 -5613 ;97 -05 -100 1NTHONY G & SUSAN BOZZINI )R CURRENT OWNER 4314 OLD WOOD RD ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -5632 • • 397 -05 -056 NELSON L & MARY WALKER OR CURRENT OWNER 14415 OLD WOOD RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5631 397 -05 -061 ROBERT L & KAYLENE THURSTON OR CURRENT OWNER 14324 CORDWOOD CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -5628 397 -05 -097 F & KATHERINE DUNLAP OR CURRENT OWNER 14472 SOBEY RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5609 CITY OF SARATOGA ATTN. HEATHER BRADLEY 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE SARATOGA CA 95070 397 -05 -057 .ROBERT H & SHIRLEY DONZELLI OR CURRENT OWNER 14268 SOBEY RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5606 397 -05 -086 THOMAS R & HEATHER BOGER 900 CAMILLE LN MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94040 -2668 397 -05 -098 NEAL P & LILLIAN KIRKHAM OR CURRENT OWNER 14468 SOBEY RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5609 Advanced Listing Services P.O. Box 2593 Dana Point CA 92624 LegalAdvertisingc3hblicNotices ing certain very important �., actions, however, the per- / General sonal representative will he required to give notiw ro N+ p tnleresleit persons unless otices They have waived notice or consented to the proposed ORDER TO SHOW 61115E action.) The independent ELDER To SHM CAUSE administration authodry will CASE NO. 107CV097fi66 es granted unless an inter - SUPERIOR COURT OF CAU- titre# person files as objet• FORMA COUNTY OF SANTA lion la the peliliwh and CIARA, 191 NORTH FIRST shows good cause why the STREET, SAN JOSE, CA 95113 auth shouts not grant the IN THE MATTER OF THE PET,- A HEART TION OF MICHAEL J. LEVY & A HEARING on the petition GINA LEVY will be held on DECEMBER S, 2007, 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 15 THE COURT FINDS that soared at 191 North First St., Pelilioner(s) MICHAEL I. San lose, CA 95113. LEVY & GINA L. IFVY IF YOU OBJECT la the gumb- has /hove filed for a deuce rag of the petition, you changing name(s) as fol• should appear at the hearing lows: and state yom objections PnsarO name or file written *blackens ANNE MARY IEVY with the court before the Pro sCLI hearing. Your appearance .war 617ABETH LEVY may be in person or by Your THE COURT ORDERS that all attorney. Persons interested in this IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or matter shall appear before a contingent ,editor of this court at the hearing the deceased, you must indicated below to show File your claim with the court cause, it any, why the yeti- and mail a copy to the Zion for change of name personal representative should not be granted. appointed by the court with - Notice of Hearing on DECEM• in four months from the date SEA 11, 2007 at 8:45 a.m. in of first issuance of letters ROOM 107 located at 191 as provided in section North First Street, San lose, 9100 f the California CA 95113. Probate Code. A COPY of this order to show The time for filing claims cause shall be published at will not expire before tour least once each week for months from the hearing four successive weeks prior date noticed above. to the dale set for hearing an YOU MAY EXAMINE the file the petition in the following kept by the court If you newspaper of general circu• are a person interested lation. SARATOGA NEWS, in the estate, you may file Printed in the County or with the court a Formal Santa Clara. Request for Special Notice Dated: OCTOBER 29, 2007 df the Sling of an inventory /Mae Ann Grilli / and appr 'sal of e estate Iudir , or the Superior Court assets or of any fi titio, ar 11/28) her, 11/7, 11/14, 11171, hco 125Da ofrthe California NOME OF PETITION TO Plabat, Code. A Request ADMIN11 ESTATEOF far Special Notice form iz ALFRED NOSEPH MERNONE available from the court CASE NO. 1.07-PR-261970 clerk. To all heirs, beneficiaries, Attorney for Petitioner: creditors. contingent credi• MATTHEW A. C0.05BY lots, and persons who may 7785 PARK AVENUE otherwise be Interested in SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 the will or estate, ar both 408- 370.7500 of ALFRED 105EPH MER• (Pub SN 11114.11 /21,11/28) NONE, aka ALFRED I. MER - A PETITION has been filed by �� C KEVIN MERNONE ANO GLENN MERNONE In the legals Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. THE PETITION requests that NOTICE OF HEARING KEVIN MERNONE AND BEFORE PUNNING GLENN M"N21 be COMMISSION appointed as personal repro- CITY OF SAMTOGA'S sentative to administer the pricy OF G COMMISSION estate or the decedent. announces the following THE PETITION requests the public hearings o" decedent's WILL and odi- Wednesday, the 12th day or tilt, if any, be admitted to ember a17:00 p. or in the probate. The will and any Dec City Council Chambers locat. codicils are available for ed at 13777 fruitvale examination in the file kept Avenue, Saratoga, CA by ........ ' 95070. Details and plans THE PETITION ,quests are availableat the Saratoga authority to administer Community Development the estate under the Department Monday ,"depend,,, Adminislralton through Thursday, 7:3Z ,.o. of Estates Act. (This author- - 5:00 p m. If you have quos- ity will allow the personal Lions, Planneh are available representative to ,aka many at the public counter actions without obtaining between the hours of 7:30 court approval. Before lak- a.m. and 12:00 noon. proposed Boar area will be Map and Use Permit All interested persons may a,proximareb 6,088 square approvals granted by the appem and be heard al the feet. The maximum height of Planning Commission n above lime and place. 11 you the proposed building will October 27, 2004. The challenge a decision of the not exceed the 26-fool Tentative Map and Use Planning Commission por. height limit The maximum Permit ayprwals expired 24 suant to a public hearing in impervious coverage will net months from this dale. The court, you may be limited to exceed the allowable 35 %of applicant was granted a one raising only those issues you the net silearea. The lot size year extension of the or someone else raised at is approximately 45.564 Tentative' Map and Use the public hearing(s) square feet, and the site is Permit approvals on October described in this notice, or in located in the R- 1- 40,000 25, 2006. This one year written correspondence zoning district. Design extension has expired. The delivered to the Saratoga Review approval is required 24 month extension will Planning Commission at, or pursuant to Saratoga expire on October 27, 2009. prior lo, the public hearing. Municipal Code Section 15• The applicant was granted In order to be included in 45.060. Tentative Map and Use the Planning Commission's APPLICATION# 07 -253 Permit approvals to subdi- information packets, written (393- 41 -032) vide a 29.28 -1. property communications should be Metro PCS. into Me clustered soh with filed on or before the 20455 Merriman Avenue - an average lot size of 1.73 Tuesday, a week before the The appluant is requesting acres. The remaining 19.49- meeting. Conditional Use Permit acre portion of the property A site visit will be held on approval to locate a wireless is to remain in open space the day preceding the hear- facility at the Presbyterian with a pedestrian, equeshi. ing date listed shove as part Church on Herriman at an trail winding through the of the standard Site Visit Saratoga Avenue. The pro• open space. Access to the Committee agenda. Site vis• jecl consists of a new voss property is to be via a cut. its occur between 3:30 and structure with concealed de-sac, which egresses onto 5:00 p.m. The site visit is antennas and a new equip. Mount Eden Road. An eme, open to the public. The Site ment cabinet screened by gency access road Is pro. Visit Committee will convene existing landscape. The lot posed from Vista Regina at the City Hall parking lot at size is 6.22 acres and the Road to the cut. de•sac. The 3:)0 p.m. on the day preced- snort zoned R- 1.12,500. property has a General Plan ing the hearing and visit the APPLICATION# designation ofRHC - Hillside site listed above and may PDR07 -0011 Conservation and Is rated visit other sites as well. For (386.43 -006) HR • Hillside Residential more Information please Yondlian Wang; 19278 District. contact the Community Bellwood Drive: • The appli- (Pub SN 11/28) Development Department at cant request Design Review — 408 8684222 or review the approval to remove an exist - Site Visit Agenda on the in 859 square foot second �,z Trustee City Website at www.saralo• story of an existing Iwo• ga.ca.us. story single-family residence Sales APPLICATION# and replace it with a new PDR07 -003 B59 square foot second (397 -05 -042) story addition in pproxi- Pilzen,14416OldwoodRoad mately the same location. NOTICE OFTRUSTEE'S SALE • The applicant requests The residence will not TRUSTEE SALE Design Review approval to exceed 26 feet in height. NO. 201-052008 add a second Boor to the The net lot size is 14.712 LOAN NO. existing single story rest- square feet. The site is TITLE ORDER NO. 060323 dente. The addition zoned R -1- 12,500. D3391287 indudet approximately 298 APPLICATION# YOU ARE IN DEFAULT square feet to the existing EX 7-0001 - UNDER A DEED OF TRUST first noor and a new, app.. (503.13 -067) DATED 4a -2006. UNLESS imately, 1,157 square fool Brunetti /Ho; Mt. Eden Rd. YOU TARE ACTION TO PRO- second-story to the existing south or Villa Oaks Lane - TECT YOUR PROPERTY, IT 4,633 square loot single• The applicant requests a 24 MAY BE SOLD AT A PUBLIC story residence. The total month cru ..ivnof Tentative SALE. IF YOU NEED AN Important Information: No refunds after submission. Canc,led ads Will receive credit for fture advertising, not a refund. Ads most be canceled before deadline for that issue. Advertisements are accepted upon the representation that the advertiser and /or its agency have the right to publish the Contents diercof. In Con• sideration of such publication, advertiser and its agency agree to indemni- fy and hold the publisher harmless against any expense or loss by reason Of any Claims arising our of publication. The publisher reserves the right to edit, alter, omit, or refuse any advertising submittal. For policies concerning specific categories, ple-c refer to the paragraph at the beginning of the category or call us at 408.200.1025 . or email us at classifieds @community- n— papers.com. S#icon Valley Community Newspapers accepts no liability for its failure, for any cause, to insert an advertisement Liability for any error appearing in an adver- tisement is limited to the cost of the space actualty occupied. No allowance, however, will be granted for an error that does not materially affect the value of the advertise- ment. To quality for an adjustment, any error must be reported within 15 days of publication date. Credit for emirs is limited to first insertion. • • • EXPLANATION OF THE c nveyed to and now held by INFORMATION, CLARA County. California, far the total amount (at the FOR THAT PURPOSE. SAN JOSE CA at public am• or federal savings and loan NATURE Of THE PROCEED- the trustee in the hereinafter PLEASE CALL n4- 259.7850 executed t HOMER time of the initial publication ASAP#933600 lion, to the highest bidder association,savingsassacia- INGSAGAINSTYOU,YOU described properly NET under website: BRYANT AND ANTE LYNN of the Notice of Sale) reason. (Pub SN 11121, 11/28,12/5) for cash or check as lion, ar savings bank speci- SHOULD CONTACT A and pursuant to the Deed of www.fidelityasapmm BRYANT, HUSBAND AND ably estimated to be set NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S STILE described below, payable in lied in Section 5102 of the LAWYER. Trust. The sale will be made, PLM LENDER SERVICES, WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS, as forth below. The amount lull at time of sales all Financial Code antl aulho- On12.12- 2007 at 11:00 A.M., but without covenant of war. . INC., As Trustee - Truslor, KELLEY YAN ES, may be greater on the day of TSC NO. ED 07 -3ea13 right, title, and interest PLM LENDER SERVICES, INC. rarity, aspressad or implied, (408)•3704030 TRUSTEE OF THE KELLEY sale. Place of Sale: AT THE 00[ID conveyed to and now held sized to do business in this ELIZABETH GODBEY, YANES REVOCABLE TRUST, NORTH MARKET STREET 0000940285622005N by it under said Deed of stale. Said sale will be as the duly appointed regarding title, possession, TITLE ORDE0. made. in an'AS IS' condi. Trustee under and pursuant ear encumbrances, to pay the VICE PRESIDENT AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 48.0% ENTRANCE TO THE COUNTY Trust. in the properly siluat- N0. BGR25g2 lion, but without covenantor to Deed of Trust Recorded remaining principal sum of PLM LENDER SERVICES, INC. INTEREST AND FIRST BLACK- COURTHOUSE, 190 NORTH ed in said County and State 04 -06 -2006, Book . Page . the nole(s) secured by the 15 A DEBT COLLECTOR HAWK FINANCIAL CORP., AS MARKET STREET, SAN JOSE. N E09; 215X5' RER and as more fully described warranty, express or implied. Instrument 18875734 of Dili. Deed of Trust, interest there. ATTEMPTING TO COLLECT A TO AN UNDIVIDED 52.0% CA Amount of unpaid bal- the above referenced regarding title, possession DEBT. ANY INFORMATION APN NO. 389-13-037 trot records In the Office of on, estimated fees, charges INTEREST, as Beneficiary, ante and other, charges: YOU ARE IN DEFAULT Deed al Trust. the street m encumbrances, to satisfy the Recorder of SANTA and expenses' the Trustee OBTAINED WILL BE USED will sell at public auction 5711,246.13(estimated) UNDER A DEED OF TRUST, address and other common the indebted ass secured by CLARA County. California, for the total amount fat the FOR THAT PURPOSE. sale to the highest bidder For Street address and other . DATED 6/24/2005. UNLESS designation, if any, at the said Deed of Trust, advances executed by: HOMER time of the initial publication ASAP# 933599 cash, cashier's check drawn common designation of [he DATED TAKE ACTION TO PRO- real property descrfbed thereunder, with interest as BRYANTAND ANNETTELYNN of the Notice of Sale) reason. (Pub SN 11/21.11/28,12/5) by a state or national bank, a seat property purported as: TECT YOUR PROPERTY, I7 above is purported to he: provided, and the unpaid BRYANT. HUSBAND AND ably estimated to be set NOTICE OFTRUSTEE'S SALE cashier's check drawn by a 14215 WORDEN WAY MAY BE SOLO AT A PUBLIC 18580 PASEO LIDO, principal of the Note secured WIFE AS JOINT TENANTS, forth below. The amount TRUSTEESALE slateor federal credit union, SARATOGA, CA 95070 APN SALE. IF YOU NEED AN SARATOW, CA 95070. The by said Deed of Trust with as Truslor, KELLEY YANES may be greater on the day of NO. 01-05200 oracashier's checkdrarvn by Number: 397- 26 -Dq7 The EXPLANATION OF TNF an Trustee dis interest thereon as povided REVOCABLE TRUST, AS sale. Place of Sale: AT THE LOAN NO a state or federal savings undersigned Trustee dis- NATURE OF THE PROCEED. claims any liability for any in said Note, plus fees, TO AN UNDIVIDED NORTH MARKET STREET TITLE ORDER NO. and loan association, saw- claims any liability for any LNG AGAINST YOU. YOU i^coneclness of the street charges and expenses of the 53.33333333% INTEREST ENTRANCE TO THE COUNTY 06032403391352 'ngs association, or savings incorrectness of the street SHOULD CONTACT A address and ocher common Trustee and of the frosts ere• AND FIRST BLACKHAWK COURTHOUSE, 190 NORTH YOU ARE IN DEFAULT bank specified in section address and other common LAWYER. designation, if any, shown NNANCIAL CORP.. AS TO AN MARKET STREET, SAN IOSE, UNDER A DEED OF TRUST 5102 of the Financial Code designation, if any, shown Notice is hereby given that herein. The total amount of ated by said Deed of Trust. UNDIVIDED 46.66666667% CA Amount of unpaid bal- DATED 4.03 -2006. UNLESS and authorized to do bull. herein. The property hereto- RECONTRUST COMPANY, the unpaid balance with DATED: 11 118/2007 INTEREST, as Beneficiary, ante and other charges: YOU TAKE ACTION TO PRO" ness in this slate. Sale will fore described is being sold N.A., as duly appointed interest thereon of the RECONTRUST COMPANY, will sell at public auction 5775.Oa2.66(estimated) TER YOUR PROPERtt. IT be held by the duly appoint- "as is'. trustee pursuant to the obligation seemed by the NA sale to the highest bidder for Street address and other MAY BE SOLO AT A PUBLIC ad trustee as shown below, DATE: 11 -08 -2007 Deed of Trust x c led by properly to be sold plus rea• 1757 TAPO CANYON ROAD, ca sh. cashier's check drawn common designation al the SALE. IF YOU NEED AN of all right, title, and interest FOR TRUSTEE'S SALES XUAN PHAM, A MARRIED savable estimated costs, SVWBB SIMI VALLEY. CA by a state or national bank, a real property purported as: EXPLANATION Of THE to nveyed to and now held by INFORMATION, WOMAN, AS HER SOLE AND expenses rid advances 93063 cashier's check drawn by a 14201 WORDEN WAY NATURE OF THE PROCEED" the trustee in the hereinafter PLEASE CALL 714.259 -7850 SEPARATE PROPERTY, dated at the time oFthe Initial Phone: (800) 2818219, stale or federal credit union. SARATOGA, CA 9507D APN INGS AGAINST YOU, YOU described property, under Websile: 06/24/2005 and recorded Ikation Of the Notice of Sale Sale Information cashier's check drawn by Number: 397 -26 -046 The SHOULD CONTACT A and pursuant to the Deed of www.fidelilyasap.com 06/30/05, as Instrument i,1 l'799.45. (805) 578 -6618 ar state or federal sayings undersigned Trustee dis - LAWYER. Trust. The sale will be made, PLM LENDER SERVICES, No'18447319, in Book, Page It is possible that al the By: Trustee's Sale Officer and loan association, say- claims any liability for any On 12.12 -2007 at 11:00 AM., but without covenant or war• INC., As Trustee ), of Official Records in the time of sale the opening RECONTRUST COMPANY, 'ngs association, or savings incorrectness of the street PLM LENDER SERVICES, INC. rarity, expressed or implied, (408)•370.4030 office of the County Recorder bid maY be less than the N.A. is a debl collector bank specified in section address and other common as the duty appointed regarding Lille, possession, ELIZABETH GODBEY, of Sama Clara County, total indebtedness due. In attempting to collect a debt. 5102 of the Financial Code designation, if any, shown Trustee under and pursuant or en cumbrances, to pay the VICEPRESIDENT State of California, will sell addition to cash, the Trustee Any information obtained and authorized to do buss• herein. The property hereto to Deed of Trust Recorded remaining principal sum of PLM LENDER SERVICES, INC. on 12111/2007 at 11:OOAM, will accept cashier's checks will be used for that r ss in this stale. Sale will fore described is being sold 04.06 -2006, Book ,Page , the notes) secured by the IS A DEBT COLLECTOR AT THE NORTH MARKET drawn on a state or national pu . be held by the duly appoint. "as is ". Instrument 18875736, of Deed of Trust, interest there. ATTEMPTING TO COLLECT A STREET ENTRANCE TO THE bank• a check drawn by a pose. ed trustee as shown below, DATE: 11 -08 -2007 official records in the Office on, estimated lees, charges DEBT. ANY INFORMATION COUNTY COURTHOUSE, 190 state or federal credit union, ASAP8929490 of all right, title, and interest FOR TRUSTEE'S SALES of the Recorder of SANTA and expenses of the Trustee OBTAINED WILL BE USED NORTH MARKET STREET, or a check drawn by a state (Pub SN 11/21,11128,12/5) NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT • A NEGATIVE DECLARATION BEFORE PLANNING COMMISSION Prarainingt Updam ro code regulations pertaining to knees, walls, and hedges. Application 7.OA07 -0001 CITY OF SARATOGA'S PUNNING COMMISSION announces the fallowing public hearings project Location m NXednaday, the 12th day of December at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers located at Cavwide 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Details and plan are available at the Saratoga Property 0vvner(s) Community I)mlupment Department, Monday through Thursday, 7:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. If you Various have questions• Planners are available at the public counter benween the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 12:00 Lead Agency and Add.. noon. City of S—roga Community Dewelopmcm 13777 Fmits•ale Avenue All interested parsons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a de:i- Saratoga, Uifornis 95070 lion of the Planning Commission pursuant to a public hearing in court, you may be limited to rais- Applicant / Project $Pont., Trig only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hcaring(s) described in this notice. or �mCity of nat�ga in written Correspondence delivered to the Saratoga Planning Commission at, or prior to, the pub- 13,'77 Fru talc A taut t tic hearing. In order to be included in the Planning Commissions information packets, written com- Sanm_p, California 95070 munications should be filed on at before the •Tuesday, a week before the meting. Contact Person and Phone Number Shswem Bhm Assoc m Plan A sire visit will be held on the day preceding the hearing date listed above as parr of the standard Site (408) 868 - 1266 Visit Committee agenda.- Site visits occur between 3:30 and 5:00 p.m.- The site visit is open to the public.- The Site Visit Committee will convene at the City Hall parking lot at 3:30 p.m. on the day Pmje fseschpd.rs _ preceding the hearing and visit the site listed above and may visit other sites u well. For more info The f,hy Dfm mnaga is lacking ..bi m . ex,c 'pion D ah` code ear is ll- to cent , .va1RS, and hedges winixrnc rn p P g S inggnal. o rid: (1) to x epi pr . ha would II w prop n. Dwne .x xc,d them i m pn- matian please contact the Community Development Department at 408 868 -1222 or review the Site °toed fence height C2) . rid fence heighn limintiom around driveway apron, and (3) so elarifi• ambiguous language and areas of the code that am ce—ndr di0iculn m enfora�. Visit Agenda on the City VGebsite at www.saramga.ca.us. - Reason for Negative Emelaradyn The proposed update c° he co&, as it mlacs so fences, walls, and hedges, is nut anricip and m Dose any slut— l APPLICATION# 7OA -07 -0003 (City )Mdc) Neglected Properties Ordinance:- The Planning ad— impers on the en Vimnme,nr. Commission will consider a draft ordinance to set standards for the minimum level of maintenance Bedew Pt ad All co menu regarding the —nmoicss complenenas, or adect ey of this Initial Study torn, be m eiv xi by nhe Saawga of private property in Saratoga.- The ordinance would establish standards For (1) general property Plannirng Deparcros t, 1377.7 Froit ale Avenut, Sararoga, Cali (urnia n° lams than 5:00 PN4 on January 03. 2008. maintenance (e.g., overgrown Vegetation, mc—red structures, or conditions of deterioration or dis - I)acN litI, be a lcd for is Hearings of repair that creates a substantial adverse impact on neighboring properties), (2) single family miden- Trnucivdv scheduled for PL nning C•ommiuion Review Janus y 23, 2008. PL nning Canvnission M1carings cake plea hs tial use landscaping, (3) multifamily residential use landscaping, and (3) parksrrips between sidewalks the Civic Auditorium (137"'7 Fmimle Aveoae. 5—mga, California) and City staets,- The ordinance would also specify enforcement and appeals procedures. Copies Available I.r Public Reriaw The Initial Study is awilable for public review at Ciw Hall, Planning Department bated at 13777 Fruiwale Avenue. (Pub SN 11/28107) 1 1 (Pub SN 11/28107) • ATTACHMENT 7 � 0 d k , ,r k �.... a'/tti '. _. '.�.kii�r'.t '° s d., g:a�:,�• +�i�''�� 4 .•.� .. .r�. .C:: d�.:'.._: OIL r A "ar JUL kF'i i U;i k , 3 . .: tti . + 1 r ;m+r ,\ J 'q-�r 1 •�:p'. r ..� a a: -i. ,^•d. ...'° i!!T ` `u: i �,} ry T Sk^'; > ca. > � " �,{{ �` c� �'^ f �' "�� � � � r`' Q� �yC � ;t. :...�.: �" •,.�•� : r r ' . . � ,, s "'�'4 r ,; °' A ,1 ?;�'ti $. £ n' *'�S'.St r, a 1S4'r � r �; , , s J•� .�3' 1"�`:':. ;';'yam' 'h'x .•�� ':�. 4 *M..y�.%3;� .4, 3 � 4, ;Y. +' .��.i���r �� if � �.. �" �� w ,�r.� �i � NOW "t :., of :. b. t•.+ -. _!TS �s'( ..:;..•�+w"A.;' i�S "'_ a .t' �d° Y 7 _ �•' �� y .4�c, rw :3:' F1h. �:`*'�` s� sty � > - x� . 6, � ."`;y'+� ' �. ��� r "a "�.. � ��•'i T,k�:.�y ,�f+��- - jf'.!!• +.ht,r. �},• y$.4 t i ,.:4.. F "°�- +{�*,r,:r $� R w m.•SF.i 1, _� .• '*. -S= W '�a,. n(r i$'- £. �. ,. :+:.W� A J!ii'r! �'�.( .F •r t.. _ _ 91 5�r.>i ' t�. £�Y`cR r.. fr. .. �.- :.,,,C. s - _ I f�..,��.'' r 1 r' r.•.� — (�,,�.AS �:: a '- -•�i.< : ^'�N �. .•'�' %3� " S" .•:�� '�jr„ki - Y. _t ' �t . ,, ry .s+ �� .ti .. -�„ . � A,i�-�"�::4 �:4 J" . '1"� .gF.1a.VC Fr` ^'_ °• +L y_ }.• ••t �{ '".,4rn.�i :l: -' yi ' •V.. / ,f�t. �4i ": - ,�,� t: "i � - -..�.; Y'i"�''s �b '. .✓° '° ` � t��� t' . T�'= �',"a^ ',y��i : •` {i -`,� "Try r:--: _ t"� ! r'• �� ,, _ Y;;" V �t l�+h� y,is! }'•rte ':.Cy 7:.i•,yl ..y, * ^s +,. .,.;.r6 ;l.r� -� $,- rj si3 �' p'? "� i'E✓S•. K. •% ' ' ��f W-M4RW .,�. f ''�. {' • �� t7. 11 Ill +ir - •r'p*' ', l w .. _A°i YY �I �'•"��"` +�'��y� ° �. 111 � «._. �R`"•- �'"""- "3,f� r y w 11 111 1 riv 6ii ell t Ill lib All 19" r .����..,. Hi�� i bf f ,may ,y T i' 0. r* t ` •Mar. �J `IL'f. /;p ♦ . . . . . . . . . . . Ing E iip • 1 ] t • 1 ] 1 fir''' - �. � •i y��',' y� yam, S ';j1, !1 y1 I. �M1 1 1 Y'• 1' 1 � Jo G Al P G • � t.�iia.ni +t6s� w K `pxj► Z '1 rc- Ali r. J i' -t a•' ..•w r 1 t l r< 7 n V:'a Ilp"�J 7r y ® P6e i i a .i.14 Dom- I -M�y i'4.��rr t �. •' - u?lr,r,• gip, '. r &. Lit pd�;, #RE_V,� " Nf 'jtlta V i I� L� . "11y •�Ss Y`a .7 J sl r s > S X 1 I i o S P - 7 1 fir''' - �. � •i y��',' y� yam, S ';j1, !1 y1 I. �M1 1 1 Y'• 1' 1 � Jo G Al P G • � t.�iia.ni +t6s� w K `pxj► Z '1 rc- Ali r. J i' -t a•' ..•w r 1 t l r< 7 n V:'a Ilp"�J 7r y ® P6e i i a .i.14 Dom- I -M�y i'4.��rr t �. •' - u?lr,r,• gip, '. r &. Lit pd�;, #RE_V,� " Nf 'jtlta V i I� L� . "11y •�Ss - -- - — -- --, : — —11Y I I 77777 �,I 7,7 * mo .. . .... Ile' 'r'-f g 81 7E. A J."El it T%C TA ..... Al"i - -4 :Awl, a, �pp ,,, 4 41 J :]%q A &vim 4w Yl- , o"Au CIO Aw"i 4 Ao Ve rm 6 -URI �j ATTACHMENT 8 � • • NOTES I, ALL CONSTRUCTION *HALL COMPLY WITH, A) CALIF. FIRE CODE 2001 EDITION (2000 UFC) B) CALIF, BLDG CODE 2001 EDITION (1981 UBC) C) CALIF. MECN. CODE 2001 EDITION 0000 UMC) D) CALIF. PLUMS'G CODE 2001 EDITION (2000 UPC) E) CAUP. ElEC. CODE 2004 EDITION (2002 NEC) F) 200E ENERGY CODE G) ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL A STATE LAW* 4 REGULATIONS- LI 1.ERWJOo 9 `AIE OWNER DAVID 4 .ENNIFER PITZEN 14416 OLD WOOD RD SARATOGA, CA 95010 (40B) 24s -7800 DESIGNER, ' ERVIN LAVON WAWB HOUSE OF HAWS 2061 COLU6A WAY SAN JOSE, CA, 95130 (408) 314 -3999 - CIVIL ENGINEER; CARROLL ENGINEERING 1101 S. WINCHES TER, BLVD, Ka -154 SAN JOSE, CA., 95128 (408) 26h0800 R- 40,000 BUILDING SETBACKS MEMO REQUIRED i ACTUAL BUILDING AREAS. EXISTING NEW ADD'N TOTAL LOWER 3813 554 4421 UPPER O 1151 1151 GARAGE 160 C256> 504 TOTALS 4633 1483.5 6088 M.F.A. 6120 S.F. FOOTPRINT 4421 504 • 493I S.F, DCI6TING'LOT COVERAGE 29.3% 13946 S.F. ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE 35% 15,941,4 S.F, MAX ELEVATION NIGH POINT OF NAT. GRADE AT EDGE • 311.34 LOW.POINT OF NAT, GRADE AT EDGE • 311,19 AVERAGE • 311.265 • IBUILDING 26 343.265 FIRST FLOOR R@Q00(f���� FIRST FLOOR EY®IROW DORMWO AND STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFS FIRST FLOOR I 1 E.- TO BE 26 A, G.I, PAINTED TO LOOK LIKE COPPER PATINA G LOWER FLOOR PLAN I EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS TO BE 0.1. PAINTED TO LOOK SECTIONS 1 20' LIKE COPPER PATINA 20' . SEE PLAN ALL WINDOW* AND FRENCH DOORS TO SE DUAL GLAZED, WOOD FRAMED. 25' • NOTES I, ALL CONSTRUCTION *HALL COMPLY WITH, A) CALIF. FIRE CODE 2001 EDITION (2000 UFC) B) CALIF, BLDG CODE 2001 EDITION (1981 UBC) C) CALIF. MECN. CODE 2001 EDITION 0000 UMC) D) CALIF. PLUMS'G CODE 2001 EDITION (2000 UPC) E) CAUP. ElEC. CODE 2004 EDITION (2002 NEC) F) 200E ENERGY CODE G) ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL A STATE LAW* 4 REGULATIONS- LI 1.ERWJOo 9 `AIE OWNER DAVID 4 .ENNIFER PITZEN 14416 OLD WOOD RD SARATOGA, CA 95010 (40B) 24s -7800 DESIGNER, ' ERVIN LAVON WAWB HOUSE OF HAWS 2061 COLU6A WAY SAN JOSE, CA, 95130 (408) 314 -3999 - CIVIL ENGINEER; CARROLL ENGINEERING 1101 S. WINCHES TER, BLVD, Ka -154 SAN JOSE, CA., 95128 (408) 26h0800 R- 40,000 BUILDING SETBACKS MEMO REQUIRED PROPOSED ACTUAL BUILDING AREAS. EXISTING NEW ADD'N TOTAL LOWER 3813 554 4421 UPPER O 1151 1151 GARAGE 160 C256> 504 TOTALS 4633 1483.5 6088 M.F.A. 6120 S.F. FOOTPRINT 4421 504 • 493I S.F, DCI6TING'LOT COVERAGE 29.3% 13946 S.F. ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE 35% 15,941,4 S.F, MAX ELEVATION NIGH POINT OF NAT. GRADE AT EDGE • 311.34 LOW.POINT OF NAT, GRADE AT EDGE • 311,19 AVERAGE • 311.265 • IBUILDING 26 343.265 FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR E.- 30' LOWER FLOOR PLAN W. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SEE PLAN SECTIONS SECTIONS 20' 2 ' 20' 25 SEE PLAN SLOPED ROOF 25' W. 25' 30' SEE PLAN > REAR 20' 20' ' 20' 20' SEE PLAN > M %EMI•, qY 4O Osw•w MbYM ow ur wlrww ra tIR rwor;e•r• or ne omo�®:. oevR® �aa. row >v. rwoxr: n.w wuinler r uem. R.wt aw rI rnwr, row :nl+' rw�a�•n m r o Tr ..y e0+1 en h r 1 ry w y � O > 0 3 0 3 MEMO 0 BUILDING AREAS. EXISTING NEW ADD'N TOTAL LOWER 3813 554 4421 UPPER O 1151 1151 GARAGE 160 C256> 504 TOTALS 4633 1483.5 6088 M.F.A. 6120 S.F. FOOTPRINT 4421 504 • 493I S.F, DCI6TING'LOT COVERAGE 29.3% 13946 S.F. ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE 35% 15,941,4 S.F, MAX ELEVATION NIGH POINT OF NAT. GRADE AT EDGE • 311.34 LOW.POINT OF NAT, GRADE AT EDGE • 311,19 AVERAGE • 311.265 • IBUILDING 26 343.265 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL • 391 - 05.042 ZONING: R -1 -40,000 AREA, 1,046 ACRES 45$64 B.F. AVERAGE SLOPE 4,23% ALLOW BLG. HT, 26 FT, NUMBER OF STORIES B 2 EXISTING USE - SINGLE FAMILY RES, BUILT IN 1969 PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 13,121 B.F. DRIVEWAY 29% PATH TO SIDE OF DRIVEWAY 90 FRONT ENTRANCE WALK AND PORCH WA WCU E FOOTPRINT . GARAGES • CARPORT 5,P.ffi POOL A SURROUNDING HARDSCAPE 3,38* BBO PATIO AREA B08 13,121 I I.1_1 1.2 - 2.1 3 4 5 6 l 8 9 10 L1 L2 INDEX - VICINITY MAP - ANALYSIS - VICINITY PLAN TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SURV -- &TE�K- GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN RENOVATION / EXISTING FLOOR PLAN LOWER FLOOR PLAN UPPER FLOOR PLAN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS E>CTERIOR ELEVATIONS SECTIONS SECTIONS ROOF PLAN ! AREA ANALYSIS LANDSCAPING PLAN LANDSCAPING PLAN M %EMI•, qY 4O Osw•w MbYM ow ur wlrww ra tIR rwor;e•r• or ne omo�®:. oevR® �aa. row >v. rwoxr: n.w wuinler r uem. R.wt aw rI rnwr, row :nl+' rw�a�•n m r o Tr ..y e0+1 en h r 1 ry w y � O > 0 3 0 3 0 ' c a co U cl Q I+h .a cR4w c.Ia�Km ur I OAT@ u Aub. d+ m eHaM O.0 ' OF B�f6 • • ! 1 s N sic 1 1 1 i p9 :Vn, 3 ran nr OLD WOOD ROAD•° BLDG CATV 8UILONG CABLE TELEVISION (40' R /W) CHIMNEY CONC CONCRETE CTRL EP CONTROL EDGE OF PAVEMENT FL nw FMC rx 'nd /p M1ROIIED CURB JUN JUNIPER MH MANHOLE PAV PAVING PIL P.U.E PILLAR PUBLIC MiFf EASEMENT SOMH STORM DRAM MANHOLE Ob' • • � • `•+ O fir• i• STOR STORAGE — � Jxy P ,e r.P sA'e TELEPHONE Box TOP TOE TOP Or SLOPE TOE OF SLOPE TUB HOT TUB WF MOD FENCE 1Mf sa BUILDING LINE iv I rte' r•m 1 1 ,e +a- I r >b owx' I 9 1 1 0 LOT 2. 257 M 10 t w . +' $aa } + W I , , ru• ,. m` n 1 i 0 a' . 111 � I 1 • wa �,. y��, a s+�n 1 m`' 1fx E i • eO '6 `p4 POOL •a ipe •• `�kv4 xi,LL V! aP ro^' �• + 4i✓ x�Ua� ^y \. x 1 LANDS OF PITZE3N • LOT 1. 257 M 10 j ''�'�• / 1.046 ACRES I / s �• i / "I 1 fs ry $ \ •we'axw �tiy r�aNret•�• i �s�q.✓ ,i `�a>a • � � ♦n iY / n „ gja,AANmam a,a� . N� ,•. -,w— .,..�.o ,x..... � „w v �....�. , >. > x..�. «.. �aw�.., u.,- a .. ,� > ,....� -. ...we,... a,. r....., .. x..,,., .w ,,... r ....,.. w x- .••.a.. a q... w.- 9 -N- GRAPHIC SCALE 1,N FE= , 1 inch = 20 fL AC AIR CONDITIONING UNIT BLDG CATV 8UILONG CABLE TELEVISION CHIP CHIMNEY CONC CONCRETE CTRL EP CONTROL EDGE OF PAVEMENT FL ROW NE FMC FENCE GB CND GRADE BREAK GROUND JUN JUNIPER MH MANHOLE PAV PAVING PIL P.U.E PILLAR PUBLIC MiFf EASEMENT SOMH STORM DRAM MANHOLE SS.E SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT SSUM SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STOR STORAGE T TREE . TB TELEPHONE Box TOP TOE TOP Or SLOPE TOE OF SLOPE TUB HOT TUB WF MOD FENCE 1Mf WATER METER BUILDING LINE ----- - - - - -- FAME LINE NOTES, TOTAL SITE AREA - 45,549 SF. — 100.0% IMPERVIOUS SITE AREA — 14,564 S.F - 32.0% A E 0029((1)(1833 LF) 4.23% AVENGE SLOPE S -1. 4 FLOOD ZONE Zone X — Areas of 500 —year flood: area, of 100 —year flood with oZ." depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage area, le„ than 1 syvam m9e: and crew protected by I— from 100 —year 6aod. Community Panel Number 080351- 0004C, dated July 3, 1997 BENCHMARK: Santa Cl— Valley Water Dbtrial broas disk set in back of walk on westerly and of dawnatream aide of Pdlard Road bridge aver San Tamo, Creek, CRY of S.-tog. Elevation — 299.10. NGVD 29 SURVEYOR'S STATE)AFNT THIS MAP AND SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION W a— A TRY J. SON. P.LS. 7735 95 DATED LICENSE EXPIRES 12/31 /�Oi 4� 7ROYJ. s ERICKSON O D NO. 7TH I Kill. 12.31.07 �. 1r CALTFOP °IZ a O _ N Yl w O � •N N {•1 0 et rN v--I W � ° w � Q N x Q i E-t > Q O ° O 4j cd o 0 O N O rn II W �rc r°v p m O D VU 9 y v o U< g o �' OSSi X3885 »� a �W SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS JOB NO. 1557 9 SO4- 33.39_W _'U52' ' S OBEY ROAD (R / W VARIES) 1101 _ - -- I �o — zA r =__ - - - - -- AT — - - - -- • I� — ���'b� SECgID FLFL —ODR B,SL 1 ;I I 1 0, 1 I , I I r I , „v of A ° II NI I II le v 1 NI I I I' 1 I � II l 20'BSL ' 1 \ N00'1329 E 240.36 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ lo, I I I I I I ' I' I I I w a a BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE LANDS OF DAVE PITZEN California is IMARKI DATE I DESCRIPTION I BY 02' III n p1 PR ti � � 7 4 a y 09 3 Z' *_aoA��'� Q _ mz ou � 1 m CO �VT �'I 1101 a' 1TNCPJ B R BLVD. J�VI� BAND a-lea BAN eOBi, G D612e ro.: toe- zel -veoo DATE: 7/19/04 SCALE: 1 ° ° 20- Z U1 m = toeCo"GIS IjjI11;;lI�I(n��==II IMII�;;jII I(RI�.7� II I6�IF�;Y'7711IAnnll��--:7I C1H6NGt�LOLCGY W13.1�W�L] ®WWW DRAYM BY: TJE DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: J n N N [��� `^' -"`� ""-""' `^'�' COPYRIGHT 2004, CARR.. ENGINEERING ALL RIGHTS RESERVED w a a BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE LANDS OF DAVE PITZEN California is IMARKI DATE I DESCRIPTION I BY I 1 I1 I I I OLD WOOD ROAD -f -- _ (40' R /W) ROLLED CURB /— I PROPERTY LINE S85-26'2FF 10' P.U.E. AND S.S.E. R —17' 16'0 L= 126.57 L= 31.42' h/ _ PERp'57 M 10 / I w ii - I PROPERTY LINE ' II I 1 W LE: 1 " =16' I fl 1 I �I µ 30' esL { I ' ,I I I I REMOVE TREE TYP. I I" I = o / to I / I i I a I o� I r O it I ac 1 I a U � 'I 10' P. W PER 27 10 ca O 1° tq i II I I POOL. of °I I If J , I it I F � Ii itI � 20' BSL / it 1 / 10' S.S.E. PER S.E. M 10 -- " ®— � -- — — —/ —L-- — -- -- -- - -- 589'46'35 "E 204,92' . • ' RG'A' nF'JJtll ERS 1 PROPERTY LINE I • _ I I I OWNER PROPOSES TO REMOVE ROOF STRUCTURE, ADD PARTIAL SECOND STORY, REMODEL AND UPGRADE GROUND FLOOR, ADD PARTIAL BASEMENT AND CONVERT ONE OF THE THREE GARAGE BAYS TO A CARPORT. BECAUSE OF THE EXTEND OF REMODEL AND ADDITION THAT WILL BE DONE, THIS WILL BE CONSIDERED A NEW RESIDENCE.' PRIOR TO FOUNpATION INSPECION BY THE CITY, THE ILLS OF RECORD SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION THAT ALL BUILDING SETBACKS ARE PER THE APPROVED PLANS. ri z N O = O a ° O W W � .a 0 O U b W O U a z O W E- Q O � z W AA yW 1L y' m z fv z n w o� C1 U A O 'rN Nm uN B z m �W cl OF 2 SHEETS JOB NO. 1557 R- 40,000 BUILDING SETBACKS REQUIRED PROPOSED ACTUAL FIRST FL SEcom FLOOR FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR FRONT 30' W. SEE PLAN SIDE (INT) 2O 25' 20' 25 SEE PLAN SLOPED ROO SIDE (EXT) 25' 30' 25' W. SEE PLAN > REAR 20' 20' 20' 20' SEE PLAN > PRIOR TO FOUNpATION INSPECION BY THE CITY, THE ILLS OF RECORD SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION THAT ALL BUILDING SETBACKS ARE PER THE APPROVED PLANS. ri z N O = O a ° O W W � .a 0 O U b W O U a z O W E- Q O � z W AA yW 1L y' m z fv z n w o� C1 U A O 'rN Nm uN B z m �W cl OF 2 SHEETS JOB NO. 1557 .1 .7 • u I I F9R�s — vn pp+iif ST'_ I I I ! III it C} I �"C ,9 SCALE: 1 " =16' �+ IIx ' I I � 1 I t \ J ov OLD WOOD ROAD- saf 3 1� " ],u r , °� • I 3 (III �� os I I I 1 pa.. i 'n\ 1 fly, a•, I 0' P \ a IIhE 11� ],as r'I' 'e T;N Q y' ii'ii I m X/ 5` 1 s s8c \ I o o> -7 W f O if I�� , Z•I 11t I I I 1 pa.. i 'n\ 1 fly, a•, I 0' P \ a IIhE 11� ],as r'I' 'e T;N Q y' ii'ii I m mooaa.,�w >7� j 3 1 s s8c \ I o o> -7 r]IY� LANDS OF PIT2EN .t \ LOT 1, 257 M 10 046 ACRES \ t`t t m\ a>�oel------ --- - -- i I � a / `�` ``fie unwa�ortrto i it _1 ��a°'i t ® ?e�a`re •]y3 �n a+�. >•Y+Fz+ mar •`e's�v`° ♦ 1 I r1 r,,,•s / a,sae r r 1-1. � .0. r f 1 1 r al >43, "a� 1 ! �n IF`i > LOi 2, 257 M 10 r ry;c ans of 3 o 1y,es r r von` �'>� / j •T� oox r ones I / / 50 � k - ate.♦- � ,� .y .]5?� .// / e /a J / 1 a,>3, �,f• c �tr -19' ,a 1 �•] :ii / /i.,i �' unni°o6 x_-10 S.S.E. PER 257 M 10 S89-46.37 20x92 -------------_-- it�J DESCRIPTIbt• I PROPERTY LINE CENTERLINE1I1 AC PAVEMENT L CURB & GUj `- VERTICAL CURB VALLEY CUtR AC REMOVAL SIDEWALK STORM AREA DRAIN • o STORM DRAIN INLET ■ ■ FIRE HYDRANT Q ELECTROLIER ELECTROLIER CONDUIT --- ^^' -- ---L -• ^"-'-' B CABLE W/PULL BOX SANITARY SEWER _ •_____.. -«ti-.. • -_ STORM DRA /.1 - — • ^ -- •- -' °— WATER LINE HANDICAP RAMP DIRECTION k RATE OF SLOPE 0.02- SWALE FENCE EDGE OF PAVEMENT CONTOUR AC ASPHALT CONCRETE LF LINEAR FEET ACC Af�CESSIBLE LS LANDSCAPE ARCH ARCHITECTURAL (ME) MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION BW BACK OF WALK ELEVATION MH MANHOLE BOW BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATIONS ML MONUMENT LINE CB CATCH BASIN P PAVEMENT SURFACE ELEVATION CI CAST IRON PP POWER POLE FL CENTER LINE a PROPERTY LINE C&G CURB AND GUTTER RIM RIM ELEVATION DWY DRIVEWAY RWL RAIN WATER LEADER E ELECTRICAL S- SLOPE (E) (STING SO STORM DRAIN EB ELECTRICAL BOX SL STREET LIGHT EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT SS SANITARY SEWER ETW EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY SSCO SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT EV ELECTRICAL VAULT S/W SIDEWALK FNC FENCE STLT STREET LIGHT FH FIRE HYDRANT T TELEPHONE FF FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION TOB TOP OF BANK FL FLOW LINE TOE TOE OF BANK FOG FACE OF CURB TC TOP OF CURB G GAS TOW TOP OF WALL ELEVATION GB GRADE BREAK TP TELEPHONE POLE GND GROUND ELEVATION TSB TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX HC ACCESSIBLE WT VAULT JP JpN7 POLE W WATER - ICV IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE WV WATER VALVE INV INVERT oI� F a rn u 5 rn �w 0 z a w W U z w o A `Z b o o Z a b HI O w W a bb y O (14 U] No. C23TT0 i g o� 0 A U O m> 1' m 8 Y8C Sloe $� 8 g �o m sW2. -w �W SHEET C2 OF 2 SHEETS JOB NO. 1557 ry;c ans of 3 o 1y,es r r von` �'>� / j •T� oox r ones I / / 50 � k - ate.♦- � ,� .y .]5?� .// / e /a J / 1 a,>3, �,f• c �tr -19' ,a 1 �•] :ii / /i.,i �' unni°o6 x_-10 S.S.E. PER 257 M 10 S89-46.37 20x92 -------------_-- it�J DESCRIPTIbt• I PROPERTY LINE CENTERLINE1I1 AC PAVEMENT L CURB & GUj `- VERTICAL CURB VALLEY CUtR AC REMOVAL SIDEWALK STORM AREA DRAIN • o STORM DRAIN INLET ■ ■ FIRE HYDRANT Q ELECTROLIER ELECTROLIER CONDUIT --- ^^' -- ---L -• ^"-'-' B CABLE W/PULL BOX SANITARY SEWER _ •_____.. -«ti-.. • -_ STORM DRA /.1 - — • ^ -- •- -' °— WATER LINE HANDICAP RAMP DIRECTION k RATE OF SLOPE 0.02- SWALE FENCE EDGE OF PAVEMENT CONTOUR AC ASPHALT CONCRETE LF LINEAR FEET ACC Af�CESSIBLE LS LANDSCAPE ARCH ARCHITECTURAL (ME) MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION BW BACK OF WALK ELEVATION MH MANHOLE BOW BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATIONS ML MONUMENT LINE CB CATCH BASIN P PAVEMENT SURFACE ELEVATION CI CAST IRON PP POWER POLE FL CENTER LINE a PROPERTY LINE C&G CURB AND GUTTER RIM RIM ELEVATION DWY DRIVEWAY RWL RAIN WATER LEADER E ELECTRICAL S- SLOPE (E) (STING SO STORM DRAIN EB ELECTRICAL BOX SL STREET LIGHT EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT SS SANITARY SEWER ETW EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY SSCO SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT EV ELECTRICAL VAULT S/W SIDEWALK FNC FENCE STLT STREET LIGHT FH FIRE HYDRANT T TELEPHONE FF FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION TOB TOP OF BANK FL FLOW LINE TOE TOE OF BANK FOG FACE OF CURB TC TOP OF CURB G GAS TOW TOP OF WALL ELEVATION GB GRADE BREAK TP TELEPHONE POLE GND GROUND ELEVATION TSB TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX HC ACCESSIBLE WT VAULT JP JpN7 POLE W WATER - ICV IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE WV WATER VALVE INV INVERT oI� F a rn u 5 rn �w 0 z a w W U z w o A `Z b o o Z a b HI O w W a bb y O (14 U] No. C23TT0 i g o� 0 A U O m> 1' m 8 Y8C Sloe $� 8 g �o m sW2. -w �W SHEET C2 OF 2 SHEETS JOB NO. 1557 SWALE FENCE EDGE OF PAVEMENT CONTOUR AC ASPHALT CONCRETE LF LINEAR FEET ACC Af�CESSIBLE LS LANDSCAPE ARCH ARCHITECTURAL (ME) MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION BW BACK OF WALK ELEVATION MH MANHOLE BOW BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATIONS ML MONUMENT LINE CB CATCH BASIN P PAVEMENT SURFACE ELEVATION CI CAST IRON PP POWER POLE FL CENTER LINE a PROPERTY LINE C&G CURB AND GUTTER RIM RIM ELEVATION DWY DRIVEWAY RWL RAIN WATER LEADER E ELECTRICAL S- SLOPE (E) (STING SO STORM DRAIN EB ELECTRICAL BOX SL STREET LIGHT EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT SS SANITARY SEWER ETW EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY SSCO SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT EV ELECTRICAL VAULT S/W SIDEWALK FNC FENCE STLT STREET LIGHT FH FIRE HYDRANT T TELEPHONE FF FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION TOB TOP OF BANK FL FLOW LINE TOE TOE OF BANK FOG FACE OF CURB TC TOP OF CURB G GAS TOW TOP OF WALL ELEVATION GB GRADE BREAK TP TELEPHONE POLE GND GROUND ELEVATION TSB TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX HC ACCESSIBLE WT VAULT JP JpN7 POLE W WATER - ICV IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE WV WATER VALVE INV INVERT oI� F a rn u 5 rn �w 0 z a w W U z w o A `Z b o o Z a b HI O w W a bb y O (14 U] No. C23TT0 i g o� 0 A U O m> 1' m 8 Y8C Sloe $� 8 g �o m sW2. -w �W SHEET C2 OF 2 SHEETS JOB NO. 1557 oI� F a rn u 5 rn �w 0 z a w W U z w o A `Z b o o Z a b HI O w W a bb y O (14 U] No. C23TT0 i g o� 0 A U O m> 1' m 8 Y8C Sloe $� 8 g �o m sW2. -w �W SHEET C2 OF 2 SHEETS JOB NO. 1557 It6''01 . S'O' 0 Y-0 L 6 24 \/ bo A 6 a I li �6 ti ii T kW SW n 6-4' 6W V-6, r &W AW n 6'-4' 6..0. 2W 2-4' — — — — — — — — — — 2 T- W IV i e-0, V-0• I" O II 4'-0' . &'-W -V-0' . 6'-0* 4'-01 . &W 4-11 6'-0' P9 FH O 3W . &W 3'-6*.6'-4" 0 -T -Y.0' ,.-1- 1 2-.*m PL --: �' AL 2y. MR 24, FL 4W . 6,-0, Residence for: House of Haws Inc. 1Wfiviij David &- Jennifer Pitzen Ervin Lavon Haws - Designer 2067 Cotuaa Way, San Jose, Ca., 95130 14416 Old Wood Rd., Saratoga, CA 95070 (408) 3743939 Fax (408) 3744073 III `t Y-0 L 6 6 a I li �6 ti ii T kW SW n 6-4' 6W V-6, r &W AW n 6'-4' 6..0. 2W 2-4' — — — — — — — — — — 2 T- W IV i e-0, V-0• I" O II 4'-0' . &'-W -V-0' . 6'-0* 4'-01 . &W 4-11 6'-0' P9 FH O 3W . &W 3'-6*.6'-4" 0 -T -Y.0' ,.-1- 1 2-.*m PL --: �' AL 2y. MR 24, FL 4W . 6,-0, Residence for: House of Haws Inc. 1Wfiviij David &- Jennifer Pitzen Ervin Lavon Haws - Designer 2067 Cotuaa Way, San Jose, Ca., 95130 14416 Old Wood Rd., Saratoga, CA 95070 (408) 3743939 Fax (408) 3744073 III `t • -------- 77) VEST DINING ROOM --- ------------------------ ----- --- --------- ------- - ------- --------------- ------------------------- MASTER BATH Ilk- WIN* MAeTr=R amDRootl c1l -- ---- ---- ------------ --T ��AAT14 5 4K& 0011( .. yTONa VeNraa - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - to IL PARTIAL FLOOR pt.1►o d 1. \ F-D-) [L@)(DF-D-) [IDUN -- /4vu RZWU-� F ---- - ------- ------- --- ----- - ---- -- -------------- ------------------------- ---------------------- - x EXERCISE ROOM iq 4' SUA ROOM L C L" 0, NOOK f I- low L IFT� Il lv-0". 6,41 W-0, x i-w 164 0 r — — — 0,0 310 I BEDROOM ob LIVING ROOM 0 KITCHEN 0 FAMILY ROOM W. MCWMA- T�E CARPORT GARAGE - - - - --- - -------- ------------------ ---- -- -------------------- ------- ---------- ------------- ------------------------------- --------------- ----------------- --------------------------- ---------- ------- r -------- -- - •p FOYER': ----------- 1 VEST. DRAWN u c UTILITY DINING ROOM 24' KJ4 24'..W LIBRARY oAm AV.. 01 ACALr 2�- YEW Fg-T:'_LITy 2'-' NG FaT 2!rn.- 2W X!V,. i -------- OF 5-4 -- --------- -7p,'7 C r O O r z X T Z_ D n a � go 4� e Residence for: David & Jennifer Pitzen House of Haws Inc. Ervin Lavon Haws - Designer 14416 Old Wood Rd., Saratoga, CA 95070 2067 Colusa way, San rose, Ca., 95130 (408) 3743939 Fax (408) 3744073. if lit � I VOb b. VOb 9 8 e 3 - - � a J. a Y b NNW" YOID 3 VOb 4 V VOID b VOID 1 VOb a '-0' • 5'- C j I � S to I I go 4� e Residence for: David & Jennifer Pitzen House of Haws Inc. Ervin Lavon Haws - Designer 14416 Old Wood Rd., Saratoga, CA 95070 2067 Colusa way, San rose, Ca., 95130 (408) 3743939 Fax (408) 3744073. if lit � I 8 e 3 - - - y - ---- � a A -d i, 4W b YOID 3 VOb 4 V VOID b VOID 1 VOb a '-0' • 5'- ' -0' a D'-0 'O' x D'-0 2' -0' a 3'-0' 7 -0' . 3'-0' 4 b. p p X OF ROOF 3', ' 3W 'Ox ]' b' 3W II' -0' go 4� e Residence for: David & Jennifer Pitzen House of Haws Inc. Ervin Lavon Haws - Designer 14416 Old Wood Rd., Saratoga, CA 95070 2067 Colusa way, San rose, Ca., 95130 (408) 3743939 Fax (408) 3744073. if lit � I .J . .t'D JMi - FJ�A,7 V4 La'A�- N,-1J f - - -_ -.__.� ✓-'TR2 POF T- TCASTIf I MEVIdONe By TYP. CAMSTMG Deck% I --- _ -. _ . N00 - _ -T ' I WIAL. ROOFW gY4OWWN M4.po"bal I M T ` w.L CRESTING- I -�-- - -- .. FtNIgL ! uem, wat as w •ur .w.' R'mc V� 1.nur. W. r s m,o. r.so.a unwn Ma. wow. ,IN I N TV:, M. MJA'iN '�MWR .. WARpR. W � 3M.0 , i • t • yw W O O o Q 24 o . Y- -i 111" L Nz�z. • �m CD CD tit O O . Y- -i 111" L Nz�z. • �m O O t O Los rm a, O J: (9 GTO(to 00156 (J� x �$�NIIp��N la^ iffl Ut N x x x x x x x x x x T4.6g 41 g U, X io lJ X x x x x x x x x W p N W tA AP; 4, ul w W 0, r � � -wl- � LO U, —7f b Residence for I q House Of Haws Inc. David &'Jermifer Pitzen Ervin Lavon-Haws- Designer - 14416. old Wood Rd., Saratoga, CA 95070 2067 Colusa Way, San Jose, ca., 9513.0 k% (408) 3743939 Fax (408) 374-4073 I , 1#124 '111M Mill A 11 GJ —7f b Residence for I q House Of Haws Inc. David &'Jermifer Pitzen Ervin Lavon-Haws- Designer - 14416. old Wood Rd., Saratoga, CA 95070 2067 Colusa Way, San Jose, ca., 9513.0 k% (408) 3743939 Fax (408) 374-4073 I , 1#124 '111M Mill A 11 /t n 0 z n m _u I� II 4 O A E� { N.M. p A E�� R °OAVma a� G 80 4V X1 _ o y y 7 o ' 7t2- � v t9' C=1 DISCLAIMER: BORRECCO /KILIAN k ASSOCIATES, INC. (BK&A) LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, ONLY ACKNOWLEDGES ORIGINAL SIGNED AND STAMPED PLANS AND DRAWINGS. NO RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABULITY IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED FOR ELECTRONIC DATA AND /OR REPRODUCED PLANS AND DRAWINGS USED WITHOUT BK&A'S SIGNATURE. SHEET mtmmR " Dr RP. REV DATE OESEIDDTIDN DArz: e�eaimT -- � �"'"R BORRECCO /KILIAN & ASSOCIATPS, INC. NOTE DPAWH RR: y�� ffi LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ianTaomH, u .At °""`"1°aTUr° F I T Z E N RE S 1 D E N C E — 1148 Alpine Road, Soita 201 MR D, "RUSHED DR DR(RRIn Walnut cr cautornla 94596 mtt a DRAWN: 1x15 REAx rs: + + usD wixauT tH[ •ontx m•smT 14416 OLDWOOD ROAD phone: 921 sue, LANDSCAPE PRELIMINARY �•'1'orcr.�Tt Vt� u PAX: 925/944 -9120 •aeaann•REmm+n•E I ml 0 • • "THE R2 STAKE" POLE _ 5TRAP -BAR. HEIGHT AS REQUIRED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. o UV RESISTANT VINYL STRAP. FOLD AND SECURE AS SHOWN. TREE TRUNK (B GAL AND 24" BOX SIZE) { I /4" BOLTS/NUTS/WASHERS 2 TIMES ROOTBALL NOTES: TREE STAKE TO BE LOCATED ON PREVAILING WIND SIDE WHEN TREE 15 IN LEAF. INSTALL TREE'S ROOT54LL 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE (ROOT FLARE SHALL BE EXPOSED AT GRACE) 5TRAP -5AR HEIGHT AS RECUIRED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. ^HE R2 STAKE" SYSTEM- 512E AND INSTALLATION PER SPECIFICATIONS TAB AND AI TI- ROTATION PIN. INSTALL TAB 2-4^ BELOW GRADE 2" LAYER MULCH. HOLD AWAY FROM TRUNK WATERING BASIN AT EDGE OF FOOTBALL FINISH GRADE AMENDED SOIL- AS PER SOIL REPORT S SCARIFY SIDE OF PLANTING PIT AND ROOT13ALL FERTILIZER TABLETS - AS NOTED IN 501L REPORT UNDISTURBED NATIVE 501L TREE fi LANTfNG AND 57A<lNGr DETAIL CONTACT J. R. PARTNERS a (586) 333 -3090 FOR TREE STAKES — ° o aeT cRrw+ o rL.rrt q�00 eeo a FNIbu rwAOe ..v+ex vurecun ew ­ -77 7nlx � �.V` w� D- °TL�mo+mu .ea aa�aeroRr —� Ib boa meb woteau 'bcT.le�Y eloeb ew eonon a uo-eb. 5�J F U5 PLANTINGS DETAIL A A B TYPICAL PLANT LOCATION FOR USE WHEN PLANTS ARE 5PACED EQUAL DISTANCE FROM EACH OTHER AS IN ALL GROIAIDCOVER PLANTING, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY 5HOUN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AS TO COUNT AND SPACING. PLANT QUANTITY CWAa. SPACING 'A SPACING 'B' I NO. PLANTS PER SF. 9. OL. T.T9" I.ID I]• O.C. 10!0' I Ub SEE GROUND LOVER PLANT KEY FOR MAXIMUM i. ANGULAR SPACING 'A'. THIS CHART 15 TO BE USED TO DETERMINE NUMBER OF GROINDCOVER PLANTS REQUIRED IN A GIVEN AREA, GROUNDCOVER DETAIL u� n1= NO GRADING, TRENCHING OR DISTURBANCE OF ROOTS 15 PERMITTED UNDER THE DRIPLINE. ALL TRICKS, MACHINERY AND STORAGE MATERIALS ARE PROHIBITED FROM WITHN THE DRIPLINE VERIFY FINAL DE7AIL5, FENCE LAYOUT AND ANY OTHER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH THE ARBORI5T. EXISTING PRIORITY TREE TO REMAIN OF T,7 SWA�PLI!.IE INSTALLED OUTSIDE TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE F NOTING INTEFAiATION I ORANGE PL &TIC WEBBING STEEL 5TAKES, SPACE 6 FT. ON CENTER _ 1�A INSIDE PROTECTIVE FENCING WITH A 3" LAYER OF LARGE BARK MULCH. REMOVE MULCH AND RETAIN EXISTING GRADE WHEN FENCE 15 REMOVED PROTECTIVE TREE =ENGINES DETAIL PRE GRADING / PRE CON5TRUCTION PRIOR TO WORK THE DEVELOPER GRADING AND ANY OTHER CONTRACTOR WHOSE WOW MAY IMPACT THE TREES, SHALL MEET WITH THE CON5ULTING ARBORI5T To DISCUSS DISCUSS THE PARAMETER5 WHILE WORKIN AROUND THE TREE (5), AND TO SET UP A LINE OF COMMUNICATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SET UP THE PROTECTION ZONE AROUND THE TREE(5) AS ESTABLISHED BY THE ARBORIST. F FENCING 15 APPROPRIATE, PROVIDE FENCING AS SHOLLN ON THE PROTECTIVE FENCING DETAIL. ALL WIORK DONE WITHIN THE PROTECTIVE ZONE, OR INSIDE THE ORIPLINE OF THE T4EE(5) SHALL REQUIRE A VISIT FROM THE CONSULTING ARBORIST PRIOR TO WORK TO DI5CUS5 PROTECTION OF THE TREE(5) AND THEIR ROOTS. DURING DEMOLITION AND GON5TRUCTION THE DEMOLITION SHALL BE PERFORMED IN A MANNER TO AVOID CONTACT WITH ANY PORTION OF 5URR0'JNDNG TREES TO BE PROTECTED. ALL PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALL REMAIN UP TO AVOID COMP ACTION OVER ROOT ZONE BY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE CONSULTING ARBORI5T IF THE ° ROTECTIVE FENCING OR PROTECTIVE ZONE NEEDS TO BE CHANCED. ALL PRUNING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY I5A CERTIFIED TREE WORKER OR CERTIFIED ARBORIST, NOT BE ANY CONSTRUCTION CRELLS. ANY WORE THAT REQUIRES EXCAVATION WITHIN THE PROTECTION ZONE SHALL REQUIRE AN ARBORI5T ON SITE TO INSURE EQUIPMENT OPERATORS ARE CAREFUL AND TO ROOT PRNE AS NECESSARY TO AVOID TEARING AND EXTENSIVE DAMAGE TO THE ROOT SYSTEM. KEEP ALL FOOT TRAFFIC, EQUIPMENT, FUELS AND C0IJ5TRJCTION MATERIAL OUTSIDE OF THE PROTECTION ZONE. KEEP ALL TRENCHING, GRADING, AND FILL SOILS OUTSIDE OF THE PROTECTION ZONE, OR CONSULT WITH ARBORIST TO MINIMIZE ANY IMPACT TO THE TREE(S). NOTE: ARBORIST FINAL REPORT SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ALL TREE PRESERVATION NOTES AND DETAILS AS 5WCUN ON THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL ORAWING5. GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES ALL LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL BE WATERED WITH A BURIED, AUTOMATICALLY CONTROLLED IRRIGATION SYSTEM. LOW VOLUME , MPR NOZZLES AND DRIP WILL BE USED WHERE APPROPRIATE FOR WATER CONSERVATION. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE COVERED WITH A 2" LAYER OF BARK MULCH TOP DRESSING. 20. OF ON -SITE TREE5 SHALL BE 2A" BOZ SIZE. ALL STREET TREES SHALL BE 24" BOX SIZE. ALL SHRUBS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A 5 GAL. SIZE, EXCEPT ACCENT AND GROUNDCOVER SHRUBS. CONCEPTU.AIJ PLANT LIST THEE5 QAOER PAL-"A U '54NGO KAK CORAL BARK MAPLE 0 ARBUTUS UNEDO STRAWBERRY TREE /''� [,.+ } �f CERCi5 OCCIDENTALI5 'FORE ET PANSY' FOREST PANSY TREE LAGER5TROEM!A INDICA GRAPE MYRTLE MALU5 SP_ FLOWERING CRABAPPLE MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA MAGNOLIA 0 PYRU5 CALLERYANA ORNAMENTAL PEAR QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK ZELKOvA &ERRATA 5AWLEAFZELKOvA SHRUBS: i 5ERBERI5 T. 'ATROPURPUREA JAPANESE BARBERRY CEANOTHUS 'DARK STAR' WILD LILAC, ^^ } . CORREA PULCHELLA AUSTRALIAN FUCHSIA O DAPHNE ODORA WINTER BLOOMING DAPHNE O E5CALLONIA 'COMPAKTA' DWARF ESCALLONIA FREMONTODENDRON C. 'KEN TAYLOR' SHRUB FORM FLANNEL BUSH LAGERSTROEMIA 'CHICA SERI 5' SHRUB FORM CRAPE MYRTLE =–e—y PARTHENOC!55US 7R!CU5PIDA A BOSTON IVY PLUMBAGO,AURICULATA CAPE PLUMBAGO RHODODENDRON SP. RHODODENDRON 5P. 54LVI,4 PACHYPHYLLA GIANT FLOWERED PURPLE SAGE 1 5PIRAEA J. 'GOLDMOUND' JAPANESE 5PIREA E 1 TEUCRIUM FRUITICAN5 BUSH GERMANDER ACCENT PLANTS: �J(c DIETES VEGATA FORT NIGHT LILY - IE11EROCALLI5 HYB. DAYLILY LAVANDULA D. 'GOODWIN CREEK' LAVENDER PHORMIUM TENAX HYB. PHORMIUM TENAX HYB. SALVIA GREGGII ` FLOWERING SAGE r GROUNDGOvER5_ ARCT05T4PHYLOS 'EMERALD CARPET' I"(ANZAN!TA CEANOTHU5 'JOYCE COUNTER' I WILD LILAC CH4ENOMELE5 'ORANGE DELIGf -!T' LOW FORM FLOWERING QUINCE ERIGERON KARVIN5KI4NUS SANTA BARBARA 1)AI5Y MYOPORUM 'PAGIFIGUM' N-CN. ROSM4RINU5 O. 'HUNTINGTON CARPET' ROSEMARY TRACHELOSPERMUM J451`11INOIDE5 STAR JASMINE Ei r 0 N WN ! 3 0 U Zy��� da ro' a U ]! o lJ col Ei� y. �ynlfH.T♦ 0 O Z e 5 w p Z w O QIIINLLL z Q a Is) W o O (y w Q � � 0 N 13 Cr U b' 9 a m m = E � � J U w A � Z� Item 5 PLANNING COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Christopher Riordan, Senior Planner 6QVjz:) MEETING DATE: December 12, 2007 SUBJECT: Request for a Continuance: PDR07 -0011; 19278 Bellwood Drive APN: 386 -43 -006: Design Review for the demolition and replacement of the entire second story to an existing two -story single - family home. The applicant for the above reference project has requested a continuance. Staff requests that the Planning Commission continue the item to the meeting of January 9, 2008. • • • PLANNING COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: John F. Livingstone, AICP� Community Development Director MEETING: December 12, 2007 SUBJECT: Request for Continuance Neglected Properties Ordinance Due to the Assistant City Attorney not being able to attend this meeting, staff recommends this item be continued to the January 9, 2008 meeting. • 0 Item 6