Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-14-2007 Planning Commission Packet=5a 7-,, E �° March 14, 2007 CITY OF SARATOGA REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION NAME L4 t�6l_L- I S ADDRESS SUBJECT 1,�G W � Y ` ' t Pj34'1 l 0%.,- AGENDA ITEM NO. DATE?i �`'� 0--7 TELEPHONE NO. TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT (1 (Please read instructions on reverse side) ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and process to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members are discussing the item. Following discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. CITY OF SARATOGA REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION NAME gcAarc( 5Ci u k7, ADDRESS 193-5-3 BQV�ar . SUBJECT 1$34gZ� /,�r AGENDA ITEM NO. DATE 3�//,V-/0.7 TELEPHONE NO. TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT 7p," (Please read instructions on reverse side) ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and process to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members are discussing the item. Following discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings,. and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated.. CITY OF SARATOGA REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION NAME J yUGli C ADDRESS SUBJECT 4_ AGENDA ITEM NO._ TIME OF DAY CARD (Please read instructions on reverse side) P-6;lo5i4 (:�e 0 ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and process to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members are discussing the item. Following discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. CITY OF SARATOGA REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION NAME D &K UL-5 ADDRESS t9530 ,,qY 0-R- /AU, SUBJECT A F>PQ Cam( L) 6 6 '0q1O 6 'f � 3 - Z5 -O6 AGENDA ITEM NO. I DATE 3 TELEPHONE NO. TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT (Please read instructions on reverse side) ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and process to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members. are discussing the item. Following discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the 'audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. CITY OF SARATOGA REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION NAME .bR9 10 SUBJECT kg3'M L) AGENDA ITEM NO. DATE 311 7 TELEPHONE NO. Y08' - 3 i �— / / , 9 TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT 5 0 (Please read instructions on reverse side) ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and process to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members are discussing the item. Following discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. CITY OF SARATOGA REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION NAME ADDRESS SC?��y ITV PJ SUBJECT `� 3c (�{d bra► -N AGENDA ITEM NO. L DATE ,3 14 f b* TELEPHONE NO. 3 *" —b 002 TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT (Please read instructions on reverse side) ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and process to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members are discussing the item. Following discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. CITY OF SARATOGA REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION NAME kA LL- ADDRESS SUBJECT AGENDA ITEM NO. I DATE 3 TELEPHONE NO. %q f7 TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT = DO a (Please read instructions on reverse side) ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and process to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members are discussing the item. Following discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. CITY OF SARATOGA REQUES O ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION NAME (J C:�. 0 f' ,�O_to ADDRESS lC''f T" -# SUBJECT ('_ovYl chD n a ( ,. VIA Acre l -ka v. t e, 'r AGENDA ITEM NO. DATE TELEPHONE TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT (Please read instructions on reverse side) Ff -4 c ca-, ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and process to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members are discussing the item. Following discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. v CITY OF SARATOGA REQ[XST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION NAME ADDRESS SUBJECT D " sJ AGENDA ITEM NO. DATE -3-14D7 TELEPHONE NO..3 TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT (Please read instructions on reverse side) ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and process to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members are discussing the item. Following discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience.who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. • is CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION SITE VISIT AGENDA DATE: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 — 3:30 p.m. PLACE: City Hall Parking Lot, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue TYPE: Site Visit Committee SITE VISITS WILL BE MADE TO THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ROLL CALL REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA AGENDA 1. APPLICATION #06 -213 2. APPLICATION #06 -292 3. APPLICATION #06 -206 CAHOON/PICHETTI 18935 HAYFIELD COURT CROSS/RENN 20625 MARION AVENUE NGLIEM 18344 BAYLOR AVENUE The Site Visit Committee is comprised of interested Planning Commission members. The committee conducts site visits to properties that are new items on the Planning Commission Agenda. The site visits are held on the Tuesday preceding the Wednesday hearing, between 3:30 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. It is encouraged that the applicant and/or owner to be present to answer any questions that may arise. Site visits are generally short (10 to 20 minutes) because of time constraints. Any presentations and testimony you may wish to give should be saved for the Public Hearing. During the Site Visit, the Planning Commission may only discuss items related to the project. The agenda does not allow any formal votes or motions on the proposed project or other matters. The Site Visit is a fact - finding meeting where the Commission may discuss the item and ask questions from or hear statements from members of the public attending the Visit. ' No comments made during the Site Visit by the Planning Commission are binding or required to be carried through to the formal public hearing where actions will be taken on the proposed project. PAPC SITE VISITS\Site Visits\2007\,SVA 031307.doc CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION • STUDY SESSION AGENDA DATE: Tuesday, March 13, 2007, 5:00 p.m. PLACE: Administrative Conference Room located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 TYPE: Adjourned Regular Meeting ROLL CALL REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on December 7, 2006. Discussion of Potential Environmental Initiatives. (There is no staff report for these item, please refer to the inserts from the previous meeting.) The study session is an information meeting for the Planning Commission. No decisions will be made at this meeting. Adjournment To Regular Planning Commission Meeting Wednesday, February 13, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers /Civic Theater 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA • CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA DATE: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 - 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Council Chambers /Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting ROLL CALL: Commissioners Manny Cappello, Joyce Hlava, Robert Kundtz, Susie Nagpal, Yan Zhao and Chair Linda Rodgers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: MINUTES: Draft Minutes from Regular Planning Commission Meeting of February 28, 2007 ORAL COMMUNICATION: Any member of the Public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three minutes on matters not on this agenda. The law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Planning Commission may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Planning Commission direction to Staff. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS- PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTION TO STAFF: REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on March 8, 2007 REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS: If you wish to appeal any decision on this Agenda, you may file an "Appeal Application" with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15- 90.050 (b). CONSENT CALENDAR: - None PUBLIC HEARINGS: All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. Applicants /Appellants and their representatives have a total of ten minutes maximum for opening statements. Members of the Public may comment on any item for up to three minutes. Applicant/Appellants and their representatives have a total of five minutes maximum for closing statements. APPLICATION #06 -206 (403 -28 -069) NGLIEM, 18344 BAYLOR AVENUE; - The applicant requests Design Review Approval to remodel the first floor with an approximately 321 square -foot addition and construct a second -story addition consisting of approximately 753 square -feet. The total floor area of the proposed residence will be approximately 2,974 square- feet. The maximum height of the proposed residence will not be higher than 26 -feet. The net lot size is 7,840 square -feet and the site is zoned R -1- 10,000. (Therese Schmidt) 2. APPLICATION #07 -225 (397- 06 -92) NARAIN, 18596 ARBOLADO WAY; - The applicant requests a Modification to a Design Review Approval granted by the Planning Commission on March 22, 2006, which consisted of demolition of approximately 38% of the existing exterior walls of a single -story single- family residence, and constructing a second -story addition, a small detached accessory pool structure, and modify the existing architectural style from a Modern Ranch home to an International design. The P: \PC Agendas\2007Wgn 031407.doc Modification would allow for full demolition of the residence. No changes are proposed to the architectural design or building materials. The maximum height of the proposed residence will be not higher than 24 -feet. The net lot size is 40,205 square -feet and the site is zoned R- 1- 40,000. (Therese Schmidt) 0 3. APPLICATION #06 -213 (397 -27 -010) CAHOON/PICHETTI, 18935 HAYFIELD COURT; - The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct a new two -story single- family dwelling. The dwelling will consist of approximately 6,189 square feet of floor area and a basement. The height of the structure will not exceed the 26 -foot height limitation. The gross lot size is approximately 62,726 square feet and the site is located in the R -1- 20,000 zoning district. Design Review approval by the Planning Commission is required pursuant to Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.060. (Shweta Bhatt) 4. APPLICATION #06 -292 (503 -22 -101) CROSS/RENN, 20625 MARION AVENUE; - The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct a new single -story single - family dwelling and detached two - car garage. The dwelling will consist of approximately 3,818 square feet of floor. area and a basement. The detached garage will be approximately 663 square feet. The height of the structure will not exceed the 26- foot height limitation. The gross lot size is approximately 21,780 square feet and the site is located in the R -1- 12,500 zoning district. Design Review approval by the Planning Commission is required pursuant to Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.060. (Shweta Bhatt) DIRECTORS ITEM: - None COMMISSION ITEMS: None COMMUNICATIONS None 0 ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING Wednesday, March 28, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers /Civic Theater 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (408) 868 -1269 or ctclerk @saratoga.ca.us. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102- 35.104 ADA Title II). Certificate of Posting of Agenda: I, Abby Ayende, Office Specialist for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga was posted on March 8, 2007 at the office of the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, _ Saratoga, CA 95070 and was available for public review at that location. The agenda is also available on the City's website at www.saratoga.ca.us If you would like to receive the Agenda's via e-mail, please send your e-mail address to plannina(absaratoea.ca.us • P:\PC Agendas\2007\Agn 031407.doc • \ O MINUTES SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 PLACE: Council Chambers /Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting Chair Rodgers called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Rnl 1 CAI I Present: Commissioners Cappello, Hlava, Nagpal, Rodgers and Zhao Absent: Commissioner Kundtz Staff: Director John Livingstone, Associate Planner Therese Schmidt and Assistant City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES — Regular Meeting of February 14, 2007. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Cappello, seconded by Commissioner Hlava, the Planning Commission minutes of the regular meeting of February 14, 2007, were adopted with edits to pages 6, 7 and 13. (4- 0 -1 -1; Commissioner Kundtz was absent and Commissioner Nagpal abstained) ORAL COMMUNICATION Ms. Jenni Young Taylor, Resident of Oak Street, announced the efforts underway by the School District, Heritage Preservation Commission and Oak Street neighbors to get Oak Street designated as a Heritage Lane. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA Director John Livingstone announced that, pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on February 22, 2007. REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS Chair Rodgers announced that appeals are possible for any decision made on this Agenda by filing an Appeal Application with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15- 90.050(b). Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for February 28, 2007 Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR Resolution for Application #07 -207, 14451 Oak Place. Director John Livingstone that there is no staff report prepared for a Consent Calendar item. The Commission can go for a motion immediately or he is available for questions. Commissioner Hlava asked if this went to Council. City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer advised that it could be appealed to Council. Commissioner Hlava said that she did not say something at the previous meeting that she would like to get onto the record if appropriate. Upon .advice of the City Attorney, Chair Rodgers pulled this from Consent to allow Commissioner Hlava to comment on the record. Commissioner Hlava advised that prior to the meeting at which this item was discussed, she met with an acquaintance on the City of San Jose's Historic Preservation Commission. When she asked that acquaintance about Leslie Dill, she was told that Ms. Dill is extremely well thought of. City Y Attorne Jonathan Wittwer said that this commentary is relevant for the vote on the findings. Commissioner Nagpal asked if she must abstain from this vote since she was not at the hearing. City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer replied yes. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Hlava, seconded by Commissioner Cappello, the Planning Commission approved the draft resolution for Application #07 -207 for 14451 Oak Place, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Cappello, Hlava, Rodgers and Zhao NOES: None ABSENT: Kundtz ABSTAIN: Nagpal Chair Rodgers asked who is eligible to appeal this action. City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer replied the applicant and /or any interested party may appeal within 15 days of the adoption of this resolution. Chair Rodgers asked if a Commission as a body could appeal. • Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for February 28, 2007 Page 3 City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer said that a person could be interpreted broadly to include a Commission. Director John Livingstone suggested to Chair Rodgers that Item #2 be heard prior to Item #1 since a continuance for Item #2 has been requested. PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM NO. 2 APPLICATION #06 -206 (403 -28 -069) NGLIEM, 18344 Baylor Avenue; The applicant requests Design Review Approval to remodel the first floor with an approximately 321 square - foot addition and construct a second -story addition consisting of approximately 753 square - feet. The total floor area of the proposed residence will be approximately 2,974 square- feet. The maximum height of the proposed residence will not be higher than 26 -feet. The net lot size is 7,840 square -feet and the site is zoned R- 1- 10,000. (Therese Schmidt) Chair Rodgers asked if the continuance is for the next meeting on March 14, 2007. Director John Livingstone replied yes. He informed that the applicant had set up a neighborhood meeting. At that meeting they obtained neighborhood feedback. The applicant found that they needed additional time to implement the feedback from the neighbors. City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer suggested that Chair Rodgers determine if there is anyone present this evening in the audience wishing to speak on this item. Chair Rodgers opened the public hearing for Agenda Item No. 2. Mr. Anjali Kukde: • Said that he has lived in this neighborhood since 2000. • Advised that the neighborhood consists of single - family, ranch -style homes that are one to two -story. • Stated that this proposal would change the character of the entire neighborhood. • Said that another family had done a similar request, saying that they just .loved the neighborhood. However, once they obtained their approvals they sold the house. • Informed that he is in opposition to this request. Chair Rodgers closed the public hearing for Agenda Item No. 2. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Hlava, seconded by Commissioner Nagpal, the Planning Commission continued to the next meeting on March 14, 2007, the consideration of a Design Review Approval to remodel the first floor with an approximately 321 square -foot addition and construct a second -story addition consisting of approximately 753 square -feet on property located at 18344 Baylor Avenue, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Cappello, Hlava, Nagpal, Rodgers and Zhao NOES: None ABSENT: Kundtz Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for February 28, 2007 Page 4 ABSTAIN: None PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM NO. 1 APPLICATION /ADDRESS: #05 -_035 (517 -08 -026) 20626 Komina Avenue: The applicant requests Design Review Approval to construct a two -story, single - family residence, including a basement and detached garage. The existing house was damaged by fire and will be demolished. The total floor area of the proposed residence and garage is 2,868 square feet. The maximum height of the proposed residence is 26 feet. The lot size is approximately 7,817.6 square feet and the site is zoned R -1= 10,000. (Heather Bradley /Deborah Ungo- McCormick) Director John Livingstone presented the staff report as follows: • Advised that the applicant is seeking Design Review Approval for the construction of a new two -story residence with basement and detached garage. • Described the proposed house as consisting of approximately 2,800 square feet on an. approximately 7,800 square foot lot. • . Explained that this home was first before the Planning Commission in April 2006. At that, time the Planning Commission provided feedback, comments and requested changes to the design to make the house more complimentary to others in the neighborhood. • Reported that the applicant is back tonight with a Craftsman -style design that incorporates wood shingles throughout, a wraparound porch, .wood brackets, large wood trim and natural colors and materials. -. • Said that this home now blends in with the neighborhood and offers more of a historic character than did the prior proposed stucco style home. • Informed that there have been no negative neighbor comments received. • Said that the project meets all Design Review finings and is consistent with the General Plan. • Recommended. approval. Chair Rodgers opened the public hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Ms. Cindy Brozicevic, Project Designer: • 'Reminded-that there were two main issues raised at last year's meeting, compatibility and bulk. • Explained that to. address compatibility, they have come back with a true Craftsman - style design that compliments ;others in the neighborhood. • Said that to reduce the appearance of bulk, they have removed the attached garage and made it into a detached garage. This serves to reduce the bulk and helps to create a home with a more historic nature. • Stated that they have reduced the height and pitch of the roof, using mainly hips when gables were used on the original design. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for February 28, 2007 Page 5 Informed that it was the sense of the neighborhood that the idea of not having a wraparound porch in that corner was a feature that would be missed. That porch was put back into the design. • Assured that this design gives the long elevation along Komina Avenue an interesting but not distracting appearance. Commissioner Hlava asked if the wall between the garage and house would be covered. Ms. Cindy Brozicevic said that it was open but gives the house some private outside space. Commissioner Nagpal asked how tall the wall would be. Ms. Cindy Brozicevic replied that it meets Code. Commissioner Nagpal asked if landscaping would be incorporated with the wall. Ms. Cindy Brozicevic replied that there would be landscaping on the street side. She added that this is a shingled wall that matches the architecture. Commissioner Cappello asked if the footprint of this revised design changes from the original design. Is the position of the home roughly the same? Ms. Cindy Brozicevic replied slightly but not too much. However, the garage is now detached. That is a change in the footprint. The orientation of the house is the same but the second floor now sits further back. Commissioner Nagpal asked how far back the wall would be from the property line. Ms. Cindy Brozicevic said that it would be 15 feet from the property line and 10 feet from the street. Chair Rodgers asked if the front yard is on Oak Street. Ms. Cindy Brozicevic said that the front setback is on Oak Street but the front door and address is on Komina. Mr. Jeff Barco, Resident of Komina Avenue: • Said that he saw the design a month ago and is pleased with the changes. • Expressed thanks to the City for taking action to lead to this design as well as to Bob and Cindy. • Said that he is personally pleased with this design as it is consistent and compatible with Oak Street. • Stated that he did not know what "authentic" Craftsman is. Is this authentic? • Said that this is a very attractive design that fits into this neighborhood. • Pointed out that this is a very difficult parcel on which to build a home. It is going to be a logistical nightmare to build on this difficult corner. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for February 28, 2007 Page 6 • Recommended that the ,City work with Bob and the school to talk about logistics and provide an organized effort to address neighborhood impacts during construction. (a Ms. Jenni Young - Taylor, Resident of Oak Street: • Said that she has been living here for 55 years, which is four years before the incorporation of the City of Saratoga. • Agreed with the comments of the previous speaker. • Stated that this new design is just, lovely and a vast improvement in design to the original. •, Said that she did not know what potential impact a designation as a Heritage Lane might have on this-project. • Reiterated that the School Board, Heritage Preservation Commission and residents are all interested in designation of Oak Street as a Heritage Lane. • Said that while the home might be missing a few Craftsman details, she loves the design. • Said that the number of story poles used seems to be so few and she wondered how that works. Questioned the safety from trucks for children and other pedestrians and said that it would be wonderful to proactively plan to make construction safe. • Said that protection measures have been imposed for the healthy oaks and other trees. • Stressed the importance of watching tree protection very carefully, especially the heritage Valley Oak located next door. Chair Rodgers closed the public hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Commissioner Hlava: • Reminded that she was the only one who voted in favor of the previous house and was wrong. • Stated that she loves this new design. • Questioned if this home can be considered authentic Craftsman style. • Answered that she doubted anything could be called authentic when it is not being built in the 1930's. • Said that she can make all necessary findings to support this project. • Stated that the applicant did a great job reducing bulk by moving the garage. • Said that the project looks very nice and that she even likes the red doors, which are a nice touch. • Concluded by saying she is very happy to approve this application. Commissioner Nagpal: • Explained that this project offers a great example of when staff, a neighborhood and applicant work together. • Advised that if this becomes a Heritage Lane in the future this new home would be compatible. • Said that there is enough language already so she is not inclined to add language regarding construction logistics. • Suggested having some green planted to grown over the wall as soon as possible. • 'Stated that she can make all necessary Design Review findings and that she is ecstatic to see this come back this way. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for February 28, 2007 Page 7 • Reminded that the Building Department will deal with any construction logistical issues and /or problems. Director John Livingstone pointed out that the owner has secured the services of a builder much experienced in Saratoga and who will ensure a smooth process. Commissioner Zhao said that this home has a lovely design and she can make all the findings to support it. Commissioner Cappello said that logistics are more for construction than other traffic. He added that he too can make the findings to support this application. Chair Rodgers extended her compliments and thanks to the project architect for this wonderful design that "is better than we could have hoped for." City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer offered edits to the draft resolution as follows: • Add language to Condition 18 (Bond), "... to guarantee the survival of all Ordinance protected trees." • Add language to Condition 19, "...required replacement trees, if any." • Add language to Condition 25 (Hold Harmless), "... prior to issuance of a Building permit defending and holding the City of Saratoga harmless." Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Nagpal seconded by Commissioner Hlava, the Planning Commission granted Design Review Approval (Application #05 -035) to construct a two- story, single - family residence, including a basement and detached garage on property located. at 20626 Komina Avenue, with the modifications to conditions 18, 19 and 25, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Cappello, Hlava, Nagpal, Rodgers and.Zhao NOES: None ABSENT: Kundtz ABSTAIN: None PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM NO. 3 APPLICATION #07 -017 (366 -57 -001 & 002) Aaqqarwal, 20865 Wardell Road: The applicant requests Design Review Approval to construct a two -story single - family residence with an attached garage, basement, swimming pool, and detached bathroom. The maximum height of the proposed residence will not be higher than 26 -feet. The net lot size is 1.2 -acres and the site is zoned Hillside Residential (HR). (Therese Schmidt) Associate Planner Therese Schmidt presented the staff report as follows: • Reported that the applicant is seeking Design Review Approval to construct a new home in excess of 6,000 square feet on a Hillside lot including grading in excess of 1,000 cubic yards. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for February 28, 2007 Page 8 • Said that this project is Categorically Exempt under CEQA. • Advised that the required geotechnical clearance has been obtained. • Said that the applicant had originally proposed the removal of two protected trees but the request has been modified so that no trees require removal. • Informed that staff cannot make the findings to support grading in excess of 1,000 cubic yards. The applicant agrees with staff's assessment and has accepted a condition of .approval requiring them to bring the cubic yards of cut to below 1,000 cubic yards. • Stated that staff was concerned about the building materials chosen due to reflectivity on the hillside. The applicant is willing to change their colors to something more acceptable to the Commission. • Said that the neighbor notification was done and that one three -page email was received just before this meeting. The comments in the email represent five households. Their concerns are primarily the access road, which was approved to serve four parcels in December. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted for the access road and no one appealed the approval. • Stated that the access road is ready to be approved and is not a part of this project being reviewed at this time. Reported that staff. needs. to add one Public Works' condition of approval ( #14) that states that the applicant "shall obtain an encroachment permit from Public Works prior to issuance of a Zoning clearance. • Said that the email from the group of neighbors also outlines a few Design Review issues as follows: o Question: Whether this . parcel can be developed because it does not have the minimum two -acre lot size called for in this zoning designation. Answer: Section 15.13 -060 of the Municipal Code allows for an exemption for any parcel created prior to April 25, 1978. It appears this parcel was subdivided in 1948 and that an easement dated 1967 has been found. Therefore, this is a legal lot of record that is non- conforming because it is less than two acres. The applicant could develop this parcel with adjusted setbacks but is not requesting that. They are meeting the setback requirements of the Hillside District zoning. o Question: - Should the access road be counted in the impervious surface? Answer: The Municipal Code allows that access roads on a flag lot not be counted in the net lot size. It is-counted in the gross lot size-. Therefore this applicant does meet the Code requirement for impervious coverage. o Question: Why approve a house with over 8,000 in square footage? Answer: This house is a little over 6,000 square feet with a 2,500 square foot basement. The basement is not counted in floor area. Therefore, this project meets the maximum allowed square .footage allowance. Explained that she believes the email writer is present and can provide additional information on the concerns raised. • Recommended approval with conditions. Commissioner Hlava compared the apparent location of the road on Sheet C -1 versus the picture on the front of the staff report, which appears to be different. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for February 28, 2007 Page 9 Planner Therese Schmidt explained that the map on the front of the report is simply for identifying the noticing area for 500 feet. An outside mailing house provides it. Since the road was just approved in December and is not yet installed the map they use is not yet updated. Commissioner Hlava asked if the plan sheet C -1 is correct for the road as approved in December. Planner Therese Schmidt replied yes. Commissioner Nagpal asked about the property locations in relation to the subject site for the five property owners represented by this evening's email communication. Planner Therese Schmidt said she did not know. Commissioner Zhao asked if the folks were given an opportunity to provide feedback earlier. Planner Therese Schmidt said that Charles neighbor notification form as having no issues. by this evening's email raising issues. Madrone had previously signed off on the He is one of the property owners represented Commissioner Hlava asked for verification that the people building the road are not the same ones who are building this house. Planner Therese Schmidt replied correct. Chair Rodgers asked if the Commission should add some sort of provision to ensure access rights to the road during construction. Director John Livingstone cautioned that the City stays away from making specific conditions on private access roads. It is a civil matter that the City tries to avoid. The neighbors have access rights and easements. Chair Rodgers asked if the road has to be done first. Director John Livingstone said that the encroachment permit has to be issued but the road doesn't have to be completed before the house can begin construction. Commissioner Nagpal: • Reiterated that staff has addressed several issues raised in the email. That includes the fact that despite the parcel being less than two acres it can be developed since the lot was created prior to 1978. The house is not considered 8,000 square feet because basement space is not counted. The access road is not counted as pervious surface against this property per Code allowances. • Asked if drainage has been addressed. Planner Therese Schmidt reported that a conceptual grading and drainage plan has been submitted. A condition of approval requires the submittal of a final grading and drainage plan Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for February 28, 2007 1 1 Page 10 that has been certified by a civil engineer. She clarified that regarding the height issue, the measure of height is taken at the lowest and highest points and averaged. 0 Commissioner Nagpal cautioned that it is hard to deal with issues raised by a letter received at the last moment. Chair Rodgers opened the public hearing for Agenda Item No. 3. Mr. Alok Aaggarwal, Applicant and Property Owner: • Advised that he moved here from New York about 18 months ago. • Thanked Planners Lata Vasudevan and Therese Schmidt for their assistance in educating him on the local development requirements. • Reported that his lot is a flag lot that consists of 1.877 acres. When you take out the conservation and road easements, the lot is 1.2 acres net. • Said that this is a buildable lot with a proposed 6,250 square foot house and impervious surface at 13,400 square feet. • Assured that they would be able to reduce the grading so that it is less than 1,000 cubic yards. • Said that the two trees they originally wanted to remove would be retained. • Informed that'he had shown his plans to all adjacent neighbors about three to four months ago. Commissioner Nagpal asked about the proposed color scheme and what the first and second choices might be. Mr. Alok Aaggarwal said that he went to the roof tile shop and obtained materials samples that he has brought with him this evening to show. He said he would be happy to select the tile that makes the Commission feel more comfortable. Chair Rodgers admitted to having been concerned over the tile color that is called "red." Mr. Alok Aaggarwal assured that it is not red although that is the name of that sample. Commissioner Nagpal asked if the house color would be off white. Mr. Alok Aaggarwal replied yes. Commissioner Nagpal pointed out that the front view plan lists stucco or stone and asked Mr. Alok Aaggarwal which he plans to use. Commissioner *Zhao said that the house still -appears pretty massive. She suggested that something be done to add more details or make it two levels so it is not so massive looking.' Mr. Alok Aaggarwal said that he could put in another horizontal band. He pointed out that there are two roof elements, on the left and right sides of the house. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for February 28, 2007 Page 11 • Commissioner Zhao admitted that a two- dimensional drawing might have better demonstrated what is proposed. She reiterated that this seems like a big house that is out of proportion in her opinion. Chair Rodgers said that use of stone would serve to break up what the neighbors would see and make it appear like a two -story instead of three -story. Commissioner Hlava asked how high the stone accent would be. Mr. Alok Aaggarwal replied between 3.5 and 4 feet high, coming up to the windows. Commissioner Nagpal asked if the front entry is about 11 feet and goes up to about 18. Mr. Alok Aaggarwal replied yes, it goes up to 19 feet. Commissioner Hlava pointed out that landscaping would soon obscure the stone so. installing it may not be that necessary. Commissioner Zhao asked if stucco or stone would be used all around. Mr. Alok Aaggarwal said whichever option the Planning Commission prefers, he would do. 40 Commissioner Zhao said that natural stone does not seem to fit so well with this design in her opinion. A horizontal line or some detail like that might be preferable. Mr. Alok Aaggarwal said that he would be happy to incorporate a horizontal band. Chair Rodgers expressed concern in having a wood - burning fireplace in the master suite and asked Mr. Alok Aaggarwal if he might consider relocating the wood - burning fireplace downstairs instead. Mr. Alok Aaggarwal said he had a fireplace in the master bedroom in his New York home and probably used it once in seven years. He assured that he would be willing to relocated the one allowed wood - burning fireplace downstairs. Chair Rodgers said that green building techniques are encouraged, including use of glass doors to help close off large areas into smaller ones to save on heating /cooling needs and costs. Mr. Alok Aaggarwal said that he would be adding a door to be able to close off the dining room. Chair Rodgers said that these types of suggestions are simply recommendations to help reduce utility use. Mr. Alok Aaggarwal said that it is a point well taken and pointed out that he has increased the quality of insulation for this house to R -26. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for February 28, 2007 Page 12 Chair Rodgers asked if solar panels would be used for the pool. Mr. Alok Aaggarwal replied yes, absolutely. Director John Livingstone said that for the record the City does not tolerate any variation in height from the approved plans. They are very specific. He added that since this house is being located on a sloping lot, one will not see the same elevation when looking up at this house from one direction versus looking down upon it from another. direction. Mr. Matt Christiano, Resident on Wardell Road: • Explained that the emailed letter was not just from him but also from all the neighbors collectively on the south side.of the road. • Reported that they all feel deceived about where this road was supposed to be located. It has never been marked on the ground specifically indicating where it would be. • Said that where this road is going in will be.unsafe. • Added that, when they made no progress with staff on this issue, they hired their own traffic engineer. That traffic engineer says that it is unsafe. • Provided a copy of the letter and traffic engineer's report. • Suggested that issues such as utilities, fire hydrants, sewer lines, gas and water going up the hill be taken into account because none of that is up there now. • Stated that these houses are going to.create new fire hazards for the houses that are there now. • Said that this house is completely out of character and is easily twice as large as any other house in the area. It is gigantic. • Said that impervious coverage regulations are in place to prevent run off and to allow water to soak into the hillside. This road will be up to 10,000 square feet of additional impervious. coverage. • Asked the Commission to focus on safety issues, impervious coverage and the character of this neighborhood. Commissioner Cappello. asked Mr. Matt Christiano to comment on the findings related to the safety of the road. Mr. Matt Christiano said that .the new road is very steep and comes down at an oblique angle that intersects their existing driveway in a place where they have very little sight distance of approximately 30 feet. He added.that they had originally been told that the road was going on the north side of Wardell but that is not where it is going. Instead it is going on the south side of Wardell in a very congested intersection. Commissioner Nagpal. reminded that the road is not what is in front of this Commission. It is already approved. • • Director John Livingstone added that the - road was a separate process. The City's traffic engineer has approved the road with a stop sign 0 Commissioner Nagpal asked if the road would be brought before the Commission. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for February 28, 2007 Page 13 0 Director John Livingstone replied no. Commissioner Nagpal asked whether the house, as proposed, would create views interference. Mr. Matt Christiano replied no. Mr. Dan Cheadle, Owner of Lot C: • Said that he has had conversations with Mr. Matt Christiano. • Advised that it is not feasible to relocate the access road. • Pointed out that these lots were sold with the access road a part of the deal. They have been told that this road is the only solution. • Recounted that these lots sat since 1998 as unsellable. • Said that the four owners will be sensitive to neighbors. • Disagreed that the access road would be unsafe, saying that traffic needs to go slow here. • Added that in the countryside there are forks in the road everywhere. . Commissioner Hlava pointed out that Mr. Dan Cheadle's home would be next door and up the hill from this one. She asked him if he felt this proposed home is too big. Mr. Dan Cheadle: . i• Said that the design is well done albeit a little on the square side but that's how they are done in New York. • Stated that he doesn't like the appearance of the houses located on the ridge. • Advised that he is trying to design his own house to have a good appearance. • Pointed out that since he has been living in the flats he is used to seeing other houses. Commissioner Hlava asked if he has a problem with bulk. Mr. Dan Cheadle said that while the house does have bulk he has no problem with it. He said he supports any suggested architectural details as appropriate. Mr. Tom Lim, Owner of Lot B: • Said that the north side of the Wardell is impossible to build the access road. Only the south side is possible. • Said that the applicant has done a good job designing this house. Mr. Alok Aaggarwal: • Said that this lot was sold as a flag lot and that the area where the road will be installed is the only possible place for it. • Advised that he had consulted with an attorney. • Said that some might ask the question of whether this design is out of character but that the home conforms to City requirements. • Added that all of the new homes on lots A through D will be more than 6,000 square feet and two -story homes. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for February 28, 2007 Page 14 • Reminded that the five people who sent the email cannot see this proposed home from their own homes. 0 Chair Rodgers pointed out that there are several smaller houses directly across. She asked if Mr. Alok Aaggarwal had talked to the owners. Mr. Alok Aaggarwal replied yes. All seven have signed off on the neighbor notification form. Chair Rodgers closed the public hearing for Agenda Item No. 3. Commissioner Nagpal: Said that she appreciates what has been said but that this Commission is simply looking at Design Review here this evening. • Said that the issues raised by the five neighbors in their email have been addressed. • Expressed appreciation that the plan to remove trees was withdrawn as well as the agreement to limit cut to no more than 1,000 cubic yards. • Said that the. articulation and panels will minimize the perception of bulk as well as use of window trim, varying rooflines and columns. With those details, she is satisfied. The house has symmetry. She can make the bulk finding. • Added that as far as compatibility, this is a large lot with an appropriately sized house for it. The Commission does not talk about square footage just architectural design. • Stated that the story poles help determine that there are no significant impacts from this house. There is good topography and screening. • Said that as far as the colors, she thanked the applicant for bringing actual samples and is fine with either color choice. • Stated that as far as use of stone, she would like to hear what the others think but that she thinks it might help. • Advised that she is supportive of this application. Commissioner Zhao: • Reiterated that this action tonight is Design Review. • Added that the Commission cannot comment on the road. • Said that it is hard to tell with-the drawing provided but that the house looks like it might be a little bulky with its straight wall on both sides. Said that her only issue is that the house is bulky. • Stated that she thinks she can support this application. Commissioner Cappello: • Echoed what has already been. said. • Said that he has no issue with bulk. This is a big home but it is also a big lot in an area that supports it quite well. • Added that he would. like to see more articulation and that the proposed stone may not provide it since it is proposed to be located quite low on the house. • Suggested that landscaping does a better job than stone so he would prefer to see stucco to stone there. • Agreed that both color choices are good ones. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for February 28, 2007 Page 15 • Said he can make all findings and support this request. Commissioner Hlava: • Said that stucco is fine. • Advised she has no problem with bulk as there is a lot of in and out going on in the design and the house is located on the lower end of the hill and will be perfectly fine without looking excessive. • Added that there are no view impacts. • Reminded that the road is not the issue before the Planning Commission. • Said that she can make the findings. • Agreed that either color sample is fine although she herself prefers the Almond color better. Chair Rodgers: • Agreed that the Commission is not dealing with the road this evening. • Said that she sees a nicely designed house. • Expressed concern with the concept of using landscaping as a remedy for deficiencies in design. • Reminded that they have been taught not to use landscaping in that manner. • Added that she would like to see concerns addressed by architecture and not landscaping. • Suggested that, rather than utilizing some sort of stone veneer, real stone is used but she would leave the final decision up to the applicant and his architect. • Said that she personally thought stone might be too busy. • Advised that she had been concerned with the color names of "Peach Bliss" and "Red" for the roof tiles but looking at the actual samples alleviated that concern. • Thanked the applicant for installing story poles on site. • Said that as far as the character of the neighborhood, it is being established here with this first home. One can expect a large house. This is a nicely done design. • Stated that she can make the findings to support this project. Director John Livingstone pointed out that there are two bay windows in the front fagade over which copper roofing would be used. The large clay roof tiles cannot be used in that type of turning radius. Commissioner Nagpal suggested leaving color choice and use of stucco or stone to the applicant. Chair Rodgers said that she is not so sure that use of stone goes that well with an Italian Renaissance style architecture. If stone is used, it should be of a high quality. City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer said he needs to make one additional change to the resolution in addition to adding the Public Works condition #14. Condition #16 on bonds should be amended to read, "... value of the ordinance - protected trees." Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for February 28, 2007 Page 16 Director John Livingstone suggested that if a choice between use of stucco and /or stone is to be made he would prefer the Commission make that decision. The applicant wants to use stucco. Unless a compelling reason exists not to, he would generally allow that to occur. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Nagpal, seconded by Commissioner Hlava, the Planning Commission granted Design Review Approval (Application #07 -017) to construct a two -story single - family residence with an attached garage, basement, swimming pool, and detached bathroom on property located at 20865 Wardell Road, as modified The addition of Public Works' Condition 14 requiring an encroachment permit; The modification to Condition 16; The modification. so that the notations on the plan reading "stucco or stone" be amended to read "stucco "; and • Modifying Condition 3 -13 to limit grading to less than 1,000 cubic yards. of cut, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Cappello, Hlava, Nagpal, Rodgers and Zhao NOES: None ABSENT: Kundtz ABSTAIN: None DIRECTOR'S ITEMS There were no Director's Items. COMMISSION ITEMS Chair Rodgers: Advised that last week Council upheld the Planning Commission's action with a 3 -2 vote on the Martin Appeal on Springer Avenue. She added that the $200 appeal fee is a direct cost to the City to process appeals and should not be considered for reimbursement too lightly. The Council prefers not to reverse the fee. • Reminded that Council would hold its retreat on Friday, March 2 "d. At that time, they will consider Ordinance amendment priorities for the year. She listed the Planning Commission's prioritization as being: o Fence Ordinance o Story poles, mandated increased noticing, contact info signs on project sites, etc. o Sign Ordinance o Non - Conforming Use Ordinance. Announced that the Council would conduct a Study Session on the General Plan on March 6th. On March 13th making the Design Review process friendlier as well as green construction will be discussed in a Study Session. COMMUNICATIONS Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for February 28, 2007 Page 17. There were no Communications Items. ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING Upon motion of Commissioner Hlava, seconded by Commissioner Cappello, Chair Rodgers adjourned the meeting at 9:11 p.m. to the next Regular Planning Commission meeting of March 14, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. J MINUTES PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY: Corinne A. Shinn, Minutes Clerk • • � REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 0 Application No./Location: Type of Application: Applicant/Owner: Staff Planner: Date: APN: Item 1 06- 206/18344 Baylor Avenue Design Review Hien Nghiem and MCecile Tu (Owners) p�I1� Therese M. Schmidt, AICP, Associate Planner March 14, 2007 ��77 403 -28 -069 Department Head- John Livingstone, AICP, Director 18344 Baylor Avenue Application No. 06 -206; 18344 Baylor Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY: Application filed: 12/22/05 Application complete: 07/22/06 Notice published: 08/09/06 Mailing completed: 02/07/07 Posting completed: 03/08/06 Planning Commission Hearing: 08/23/06 Planning Commission Hearing: 09/13/07 Planning Commission Hearing: 02/28/07 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Design Review Approval to remodel the first floor with an approximately 351 square -foot addition and construct a second -story addition consisting of approximately 639 square -feet. The total floor area of the proposed residence will be approximately 2,910 square -feet. The maximum height of the proposed residence will not be higher than 21 -feet. The net lot size is 7,840 square -feet and the site is zoned R -1- 10,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the application for Design Review with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. 2 • • • L-1 • Application No. 06 -206, 18344 Baylor Avenue STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R- 1- 10,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: M10 (Medium Density Residential) MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE: 8,190 Sq. Ft (Gross & Net) AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: Level GRADING REQUIRED:, None Proposed uu n 1F1V 'r n A T A- 1 1 Pro osal Code Requirements Lot Maximum Allowable Coverage: Building 2,392 sq. ft. Driveway 1,230 sq. ft. Backyard/patio 247 sq. ft. TOTAL PROPOSED 3,698 sq. ft. 4,707 sq. ft. 47% 60% Floor Area: Maximum Allowable 1St Story 1871 sq. ft. (Exist 1,500 sq. ft.) 2 °a Story 639 sq. ft. (Existing 0) Garage 400 sq. ft. (Existing 400 sq. ft.) TOTAL PROPOSED 2,910 sq. ft. 3,040 sq. ft. Setbacks: Min. Requirement 1 -story 2 -story 1 -story 2 -sto Front 25.4 ft. 25.4 ft 25 ft. 25ft Rear 38.4 ft. 35.44 ft 25 ft. 35ft Side (E) 7.9 ft. 12.97 ft. 7 ft. 12 ft. Side (W ) 7.43 ft. 27 ft 7 ft. 12 ft Height: Proposed Residence 21 ft. Maximum Allowable 26 ft. Application No. 06 -206, 18344 Baylor Avenue ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposal is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single - family residences. PROJECT DISCUSSION This project was continued to a date uncertain at the Planning Commission's September 13, 2006, hearing to provide the applicant with an opportunity to work with the neighbors to resolve concerns regarding the proposed second -story addition. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on February 10, 2007. The item was scheduled and properly noticed for the February 28, 2007, Planning Commission; however, the applicant requested a continuance to March 14, 2007, to provide them with additional time to incorporate design changes suggested during the neighborhood meeting, which the Planning Commission gfanted. As a result of the meeting the applicant has redesigned the home by modifying the second floor rear windows by making them smaller, reducing the square footage of the second -story expansion from 753 sq. -ft. to 639 sq. ft. and incorporating glass blocks in the stairwell, which allow light but reduce visual impacts to the side neighbor. The rear neighbor has provided a template indicating that they support the proposed addition; however, the majority of the neighbors are still protesting a two -story addition. rres Neighbor Correspondence p One new template has been received indicating support for the project. Geotechnical Clearance . Geotechnical Clearance is not required for this application. Trees The applicant is not requesting removal of any protected trees. General Plan Findings The proposed project is- consistent with the General Plan including the following Policy: Land Use Element Policy 5.0 -The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. The application meets all the Findings required for Design . Approval as discussed in detail below. Design Review Findings The proposed project is consistent with the Municipal Code, which requires all Design Review Findings stated in MCS 15- 45.080 must be met for approval: 0 0 Application No. 06 -206; 18344 Baylor Avenue . (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The maximum height of the proposed dwelling is 21 -feet in a zoning district that allows a maximum height of 26 -feet. The proposal meets, or exceeds, minimum setback requirements. The proposed footprint is in essentially the same location as the existing footprint with a small expansion in the front and rear to accommodate a larger kitchen and garage on the first floor. The proposed windows on the second -story do not look directly into adjacent windows. The proposed view from the second -story windows would not create an unreasonable interference with views of the surrounding hillsides of Saratoga or unreasonable intrude on the privacy of abutting neighbors any more than any other approved two -story residence located in the City. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. The proposal will preserve the natural landscape. No protected trees are proposed for removal. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. The proposal is not requesting removal of protected Native and/or Heritage Trees. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. The proposal incorporates varying rooflines and exterior building materials sympathetic to the neighborhood; thereby, reducing the perception of excessive bulk. In addition, the applicant is proposing wood shutters to reduce the front fagade mass as well as providing a hip shelf roof to give the appearance of the second -story as being pushed back from the front of the structure and the street all of which minimize the perception of excessive bulk. (e) Compatible bulk and height. Residences in the area are predominately single -story, modest homes with a few two -story homes located within a three -block radius. The proposed home has been designed in such a manner as to be compatible with the neighborhood in building materials, color palette, and architectural style; thereby reducing the appearance of a large two -story structure. The proposal is a compatible transition for the neighborhood and is within the Municipal. Code guidelines for height, set -back, floor area, and impervious coverage. (f) Current grading and erosion control methods. Since the building site is relatively flat and the proposed construction is in the general area of the existing residence, no grading is proposed. In addition, the proposal shall conform to the City's current grading and erosion control standards. (g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to the design policies and techniques found in the Residential Design Handbook. Conclusion Staff finds that all of the Design Review findings can be made in the affirmative and the proposal is consistent with the General Plan. 61 Application No. 06 -206; 18344 Baylor Avenue STAFF RECOMMENDATION • Staffs recommends the Planning Commission find this Application exempt from CEQA and approve the application for Design Review with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. ATTACHMENTS:. 1. Resolution. 2. Neighbor. Notification Template. 3. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A." • • • Attachment 1 • RESOLUTION NO. Application No. 06 -206 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Nghiem; 18344 Baylor Avenue WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review Approval to remodel the first floor with an approximately 351 square - foot addition and construct a second -story addition consisting of approximately 639 square - feet. The total floor area of the proposed residence will be approximately 2,910 square -feet. The maximum height of the proposed residence will not be higher than 21 -feet. The net lot size is 7,840 square -feet and the site is zoned R -1- 10,000; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a duly noticed Public Hearing on August 23, 3006 at which time the Planning Commission continued the item to the following Planning Commission hearing of September 13, 2006; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a duly noticed Public Hearing on February 28, 2007, at which time the Planning Commission continued the item to the following Planning Commission hearing of March 14, 2007; and WHEREAS; Zoning Code Section 15- 45.060(3) requires Design Approval by the Planning Commission for construction of any single -story structure over 18 -feet in height; and WHEREAS, The proposal is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act . (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single - family residences; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Design Review, and is consistent with the following General Plan Goals and Policies:. Land Use Element Policy 5.0 -The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. The application meets all the Findings required for Design Approval as discussed in detail below. WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support the findings required for said application for Design Review Approval, as set forth below: Application No. 06 -206; 18344 Baylor Avenue Design Review Findings The proposed project is consistent with the Municipal Code, which requires all Design Review Findings stated in MCS 15- 45.080 must be met for approval: (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The maximum height of the proposed dwelling is 21 -feet in a zoning district that allows a maximum height of 26 -feet. The proposal meets, or exceeds, minimum setback requirements. The proposed footprint is in essentially the same location as the existing footprint with a small expansion in the front and rear to accommodate a larger kitchen and garage on the first floor. The proposed windows on the second -story do not look directly into adjacent windows. The proposed view from the second -story windows would not create an unreasonable interference with views of the surrounding hillsides of Saratoga or unreasonable intrude on the privacy of abutting neighbors any more than any other approved two -story residence located in the City. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. The proposal will preserve the natural landscape. No protected trees are proposed for removal. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. The proposal is not requesting removal of protected Native and/or Heritage Trees. The proposal meets this required Finding. is (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulb The proposal incorporates varying rooflines and exterior building materials sympathetic to the neighborhood; thereby, reducing the perception of excessive bulk. In addition, the applicant is proposing wood shutters to reduce the front fagade mass as well as providing a hip shelf roof to give the appearance of the second -story as being pushed back from the front of the structure and the street all of which minimize the perception of excessive bulk. (e) Compatible bulk and height. Residences in the area are predominately single -story, modest homes with a few two -story homes located within a three -block radius. The proposed home has been designed in such a manner as to be compatible with the neighborhood in building materials, color palette, and architectural style; thereby reducing the appearance of a large two -story structure. The proposal is a compatible transition for the neighborhood and is within the Municipal Code guidelines for height, set -back, floor area, and impervious coverage. (f) Current grading and erosion control methods. Since the building site is relatively flat and the proposed construction is in the general area of the existing residence, no grading is proposed. In addition, the proposal shall conform to the City's current grading and erosion control standards. (g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to the design policies and techniques found in the Residential Design Handbook. • Application No. 06 -206; 18344 Baylor Avenue Now, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the application, site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, Application No. 06 -206 for Design Review Approval, as conditioned, is hereby found exempt from CEQA and in compliance with the required findings set forth above, and based thereon is granted subject to the following conditions: PERMANENT CONDITONS OF APPROVAL — None CURRENT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL CONDITIONS — COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A" date stamped September 5, 2006, incorporated by reference. All changes to the approved plans must be submitted in writing with plans showing the changes and are subject to the Community Development Director's approval. 2. The project shall utilize materials illustrated on a materials board date stamped February 26, 2007. In addition, the applicant shall submit proposed trim color for review and approval by Planning Staff prior to issuance of Building Permits. 3. The following shall. be required and/or included as to the plans submitted to the Building Division for the building plan check review process: a. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans incorporating this Resolution as a separate plan page. b: The following note shall be included: "A maximum of one wood - burning fireplace is permitted and it shall be equipped with a gas starter. All other fireplaces shall be gas burning." c. The following note shall be included verifying building setback: "Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the Licensed Land Surveyor of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per approved. plans." 4. A storm water retention plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval indicating how all storm water will be retained on -site, and incorporating the New Development and Construction - Best Management Practices. If all storm water cannot be retained on -site due to topographic, soils or other constraints, an explanatory note shall be provided on the plan. Application No. 06 -206, 18344 Baylor Avenue 5. Landscape plan shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff, promote surface infiltration and minimize use of fertilizers and pesticides that can contribute to water pollution. 6. To the extent feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. 7. To the extent feasible, pest resistant landscaping plants shall be used throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. 8. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. 9. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. 10. Staff shall not approve downgrading to the exterior appearance of the approved residence. Downgrades may include, but are not limited to, garage doors, architectural detailing, stonework, columns, shutters, driveway materials, or similar items. Any exterior changes to approved plans resulting in a downgrade shall require filing an additional application and fees for review by the Planning Commission as a modification to approved plans. Any other exterior changes to the approved plans, which are not deemed a downgrade by staff, shall require a Zoning Clearance issued by the Community Development Director with payment of appropriate fees. 11. All processing fees, in the form of deposit accounts on file with the community development department, shall be reconciled with a minimum $500.00 surplus balance at all times. In the event that the balance is less than $500.00, all staff work on the project shall cease until the balance is restored to a minimum $500.00. FIRE DISTRICT 12. Applicant shall comply with all Fire Department conditions. PUBLIC WORKS 13. Applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit for improvements in the City right - of -way prior to commencement of the work. CITY ATTORNEY 14. Owner and Applicant agree to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in Application No. 06 -206, 18.344 Baylor Avenue connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. Section 2. A Building Permit must be issued and construction commenced within 36 months from the date of adoption of this Resolution or approval will expire. Section I All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15 -90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 14th day of March 2007, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Linda R. Rodgers Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: John F. Livingstone, AICP Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the ' Applicant, and Property Owner. or Authorized-Agent., The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms I and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date • Attachment 2 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, Denise Kaspar , being duly sworn; deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the 7`h day of February , 2007,.that I deposited 130 notices in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to -wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15- 45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor-of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property. described as: APN: 403 -28 -069 Address: 18344 Baylor that on said -day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. �ni de se Kaspar Advanced Listing Services City of Saratoga Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 408 - 868 -1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Saratoga's Planning Commission announces a public hearing on the item described below on: Wednesday, the 28th day of February 2007, at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held at the Civic Theater at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Details are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. The public hearing item is: APPLICATION /ADDRESS: #06 -206 —18344 Baylor Ave APPLICANT /OWNER: NGHIEM /TU (Both Owners & Applicants) APNs: 403 -28 -069 Description: The applicant requests Design Review Approval to remodel the first floor with . an approximately 321 square -foot addition and construct a second -story addition consisting of approximately 753 square -feet. The total floor area of the proposed residence will be approximately 1,074 square- feet. The maximum height of the proposed residence will not be higher than 26 -feet. The net lot size is 7,840 square -feet and the site is zoned R -1- 10,000. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a Public Hearing in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing. In order for information to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed on or before Tuesday, February 20, 2007. This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor's office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out -of —date information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all residents potentially affected by a project. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Therese M. Schmidt, AICP Associate Planner 408 - 868 -1230 February 7; 2007 500' Ownership Listing Prepared for: 403 -28 -069 HIEN X & CECILE NGHIEM 18344 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4704 403 -27 -694 403 -27 -095 LORRENCE J & BEVERLY OTTER CHARLES MERRIAM OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18378 VANDERBILT DR 18366 VANDERBILT DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4720 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4720 403 -27 -098 403 -27 -097 MAHTAB FATEMI DIANE H RAPSON OR CURRENT OWNER 15200 OLD JAPANESE RD. 18330 VANDERBILT DR LOS GATOS CA 95033 -8350 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4720 403 -27 -100 403 -27 -101 SHIRLEY HEROLD MICHAEL Y & PEGGY JENQ OR CURRENT OWNER PO BOX 3223 18302 VANDERBILT DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -1223 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4720 403 -28 -002 403 -28 -001 GLENN E & CAROL CROW BEEBE L & ROSARIO TUPAZ OR CURRENT OWNER 2831 CORTINA WAY 18253 VANDERBILT DR UNION CITY CA 94587 -1553 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4718 403 -28 -004 403 -28 -005 LAURA J PARISH JUNE LAM OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18277 VANDERBILTDR 18289 VANDERBILT DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4718 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4718 403 -28 -007 LESTER T HERMLE OR CURRENT OWNER 18313 VANDERBILT DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4721 403 -28 -010 DENNIS L & LORETTA PFAFF OR CURRENT OWNER 18349 VANDERBILT DR. SARATOGA CA 95070 -4721. 403 -28 -008 PAUL M & AMANDA MORRIS OR CURRENT OWNER 18325 VANDERBILT DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4721 403 -28 -011 - SRIRAM THIRUVENGADAM OR CURRENT OWNER 18361 VANDERBILT DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4721 :7 403 -27 -096 LESLIE & RADMILA MOLNAR OR CURRENT OWNER 18354 VANDERBILT DR SARATOGA CA 95070-4720. 403 -27 -099 JOSEPH GAROFALO OR CURRENT OWNER 18316 VANDERBILT DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4720 403 -27 -102 ALANGHAT G KARUNAKARAN OR CURRENT OWNER 18278 VANDERBILT DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4719 403 -28 -003 LAWRENCE L & JOAN JOHNSTON 929 LIBERTY CT CUPERTINO CA 95014 -4018 403 -28 -006 ANDREW & BARBARA WACKER OR CURRENT OWNER 18301 VANDERBILT DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4721 403 -28 -009 MARTINA I & KENNETH PAVLOFF OR CURRENT OWNER 18337 VANDERBILT DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4721 403 -28 -012 ANJAN & RAJI LUKKOOR OR CURRENT OWNER 18373 VANDERBILT DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4721 403 -28 -013 403 -28 -015 403 -28 -014 VIJAYKUMAR J UPPIN GREGORY &LYNN HUGHES EVAN V & GAYLE JUDD OR CURRENT OWNER 19 CURRENT OWNER 19288 BOUNTIFUL ACRES 18385 VANDERBILT DR 18409 VANDERBILT DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4721 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6409 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4721 103 -28 -029 WHITNEY L & ROSE EVANS OR URRENT OWNER 1 URDUE DR 3 OGA CA 95070 -4713 403 -28 -030 JANE M CHAN OR CURRENT OWNER 18408 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4713 403 -28 -032 403 -28 -033 RONALD & CAROLINE PASQUALINI VIKTOR & ANNA POLONSKY OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18384 PURDUE DR 18372 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4713 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4713 403 -28 -035 SOHAIL SAGHEZCHI OR CURRENT OWNER 18348 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4713 403 -28 -038 LAURA A LEWIS OR CURRENT OWNER 18312 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4713 403 -28 -041 MICHAEL C & KAREN HEDMAN OR CURRENT OWNER 18276 PURDUE DR S�TOGA CA 95070 -4711 403 -28 -044 MEHDI SAFIPOUR OR CURRENT OWNER 18240 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4711 403 -28 -047 HELENA L FANCHER OR CURRENT OWNER 18265 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4710 403 -28 -050 JOHN CHANAK OR CURRENT OWNER 18301 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4712 403 -28 -053 LORA NETTIE OR CURRENT OWNER 18337 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4712 056 A ELENA FREDRICK OR CURRENT OWNER 18377 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4712 403 -28 -036 JULIO BERMUDEZ OR CURRENT OWNER 18336 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4713 403 -28 -039 ROBERT PERKINS OR CURRENT OWNER 18300 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4713 403 -28 -042 GARY W & LI MILLER OR CURRENT OWNER 18268 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4711 403 -28 -045 OZAN & GOKSIN ERDOGAN OR CURRENT OWNER 18241 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4710 403 -28 -048 JOHN C & NANCY COMMONS OR CURRENT OWNER 18277 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4710 403 -28 -051 WALLACE C & LOLA WEISLER OR CURRENT OWNER 18313 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4712 403 -28 -054 EDWIN G & LORRAINE OLSON OR CURRENT OWNER 18349 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4712 403 -28 -057 RUSSELL & ALICE CROWTHER 5695 ENNING AVE SAN JOSE CA 95123 -34,06 403 -28 -031 RICHARD & MAUREEN WILLIAMS OR CURRENT OWNER 18396 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4713 403 -28 -034 RAMIN ZOUFONOUN OR CURRENT OWNER 18360 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4713 403 -28 -037 CHRISTI L KOZ OR CURRENT OWNER 18324 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4713 403 -28 -040 ROBERT D & RUTH PRILLINGER 773 ARROYO RD LOS ALTOS CA 94024 -3111 403 -28 -043 PATRICK J NOLAN OR CURRENT OWNER 18256 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4711 403 -28 -046 MABEL Y & DIANNE FOK 10339 MCKLINTOCK LN CUPERTINO CA 95014 -2677 403 -28 -049 JANET ST CLAIR OR CURRENT OWNER 18289 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4710 403 -28 -052 JUN -NAN KUO 1598 MISSION SPRINGS CIR SAN JOSE CA 95131 -3032 403 -28 -055 CLIFFORD C WILES OR CURRENT OWNER 18363 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4712 403 -28 -058 DAVID A & SUSAN JOHNSON OR CURRENT OWNER 18403 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4712 403 -28 -059 SHERRY G MIRANDA OR CURRENT OWNER 18415 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4712 403 -28 -062 SHIRLEY LEISTER OR CURRENT OWNER 18444 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4733 403 -28 -065 JILL PRESTIGIACOMO OR CURRENT OWNER 18402 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4733 403 -28 -068 JOSEPH & PATRICIA PLOSHAY OR CURRENT OWNER 18360 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4704 . 403 -28 -071 FAREED S FARD 12309 SARATOGA CREEK DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3532 403 -28 -074 SHIVARAM H MYSORE OR CURRENT OWNER 18270 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4702 403 -28 -077 FARZANEH PARSONS OR CURRENT OWNER 18241 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4701 . 403 -28 -060 MARK A DARCANGELO OR CURRENT OWNER 18427 PURDUE DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4712 403 -28 -063 MICHAEL R DILTS OR CURRENT OWNER 18430 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4733 403 -28 -066 JOHN P & EDITH CRUICKSHANK OR CURRENT OWNER 18388 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4704 403 -28 -069 HIEN X & CECILE NGHIEM OR CURRENT OWNER 18344 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4704 403 -28 -072 ROBERT & PATRICIA SALVADOR OR CURRENT OWNER 18300 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4704 403 -28 -075 RONALD SCHELDRUP 905 OREGON AVE SAN MATEO CA 94402 -3367 403 -28 -078 RICHARD WETTER 4926 MOORPARK AVE SAN JOSE CA 95129 -2133 403 -28 -081 403 -28 -080 SUSAN HOLLIS TOKIO J & YOSHIKO KAKIUCHI OR CURRENT OWNER. 963 N CENTRAL AVE 18297 BAYLOR AVE CAMPBELL CA 95008 -0133 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4701 403 -28 -083 403 -28 -084 HENRY C & DEBBIE CRAMER CATHY M MORRIS OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18335 BAYLOR AVE 18339 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4703 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4703 403 -28 -086 403 -28 -087 KAREN KOMATSU- SAMPSON H & MIKE SHANLI OR CURRENT OWNER 14168 PIERCE RD 18367 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -5391 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4703 403 -28 -061 AL ZOGHI PO BOX 3342 SARATOGA CA 95070 -1342 • 403 -28 -064 BRIAN BERNARD OR CURRENT OWNER 18416 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4733 403 -28 -067 1 THOMAS R & GAIL POFFENBERGER OR CURRENT OWNER 18374 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4704 403 -28 -070 DAVID W & REBECCA GRUS OR CURRENT OWNER 18330 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4704 403 -28 -073 MATTHEW GILBERT OR CURRENT OWNER 18284 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4702 403 -28 -076 TSAI HUANG OR CURRENT OWNER 18242 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 950704702 403 -28 -079 DAVID R & ANNE MACK OR CURRENT OWNER 18269 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4701 403 -28 -082 ROBERT W MOORE 19608 FARWELL AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -5507 403 -28 -085 RICHARD D SCHULTZ OR CURRENT OWNER 18353 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA -95070 -4703 403 -28 -088 HYUN & KEE HWANG OR CURRENT OWNER 18395 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4703 103 -28 -089 MAUREEN P FISHER OR CURRENT OWNER 18409 BAYLOR AVE TOGA CA 95070 -4703 103 -28 -092 VIASOOD & D JADALI OR CURRENT OWNER 18451 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4703 403 -29 -036 NEIL S GLICK OR CURRENT OWNER 5224 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1911 403 -29 -039 PATRICK M & SHANNON UTTER OR CURRENT OWNER 5198 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1909 403 -29 -055 CURTIS ENGELHARD 180 PECORA WAY PORTOLA VALLEY CA 94028 -7435 P29 -068 RTHA BALDWIN OR CURRENT OWNER 2236 ARLEEN WAY SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1903 403 -29 -117 RAGHUPATHI & USHA MALIGE OR CURRENT OWNER 5146 BETLO CT SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1905 403 -29 -120 CATHLENE' M MENENDEZ OR CURRENT OWNER 5102 BETLO CT SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1905 403 -29 -125 MICHELLE PENDLETON OR CURRENT OWNER 5081 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1908 403 -28 -090 DONNA T CHAET OR CURRENT OWNER 18423 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4703 403 -29 -034 TSEHAI ZEWDE OR CURRENT OWNER 5240 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1911 403 -29 -037 DAVID E & LAURA WILLS OR CURRENT OWNER 5216 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1911 403 -29 -040 TSEHAI ZEWDE OR CURRENT OWNER 5190 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1909 403 -29 -056 CURTIS ENGELHARD 180 PECORA WAY PORTOLA VALLEY CA 94028 -7435 403 -29 -069 SITYRLEE FREITAS OR CURRENT OWNER 2224 ARLEEN WAY SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1903 403 -29 -118 MANOOCHEHR GHIASSI 143 SPRING ST LOS GATOS CA 95030 -6229 403 -29 -121 MARC A & LINDA PINARD OR CURRENT OWNER 5086 BETLO CT SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1905 403 -29 -126 MICHAEL A & CAROLYN NICKEY 2430 ROSS DR AUBURN CA 95602 -9662 403 -28 -091 MARIE PACIER OR CURRENT OWNER 18437 BAYLOR AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4703 403 -29 -035 THEODORE ZIOLA OR CURRENT OWNER 5232 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1911 403 -29 -038 PHILIP D & MARY MACTAMMANY OR CURRENT OWNER 5208 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1911 403 -29 -041 ELIZABETH E HESSINGER OR CURRENT OWNER 2240 TAMIE LN SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1935 403 -29 -067 MASOUD KESHMIRI OR CURRENT OWNER 2248 ARLEEN WAY SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1903 403 -29 -116 JERRY S & NANCY CROWLEY OR CURRENT OWNER 5160 BETLO CT SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1905 403 -29 -119 EUGENIA MAK OR CURRENT OWNER 5118 BETLO CT SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1905 403 -29 -124 WENDY P JACKSON OR CURRENT OWNER 5059 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1908 403 -29 -127 BRENNAN E & ANGELINA POLLEY 10570 IRON RIDGE CT RENO NV 89521 -4203 403 -29 -129 403 -29 -130 0 91 -29 -128 BETTY SHUMATE SAM & CAROL TON EPH & CYNTHIA ZELANIS OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 1 TWAIN CT 5141 BOBBIE AVE 5155 BOBBIE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -5255 SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1910 SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1910 403 -29 -131 ANTHONY C & DOLORES ROLLIS OR CURRENT OWNER 5169 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1910 403 -29 -134 MICHAEL Y WU OR CURRENT OWNER 5168 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE .CA 95130 -1909 403 -29 -137 GREGORY C & SUSIE MORALES OR CURRENT OWNER 5124 BOBBIE AVE. SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1909 403 -29 -140 GLENN C & SHIRL WIPPICH OR CURRENT OWNER 5080 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1907 403 -57 -047 LISLE. & DELPHINE WISHART OR CURRENT OWNER 2328 VILLANOVA RD -SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1939 CITY OF SARATOGA ATTN: Therese Schmidt 13777 FRUITVALE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 403 -29 -132 JOSEPH PAPPA OR CURRENT OWNER 5183 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1910 403 -29 -135 CHRIS DOAN OR CURRENT OWNER 5154 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1909 403 -29 -138 ROXANNE L RICHMAN OR CURRENT OWNER 5108 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1909 403 -29 -141 MARK F & WENDY SMALL OR CURRENT OWNER 5066 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1907 403 -57 -048 LYNN A ROEDER OR CURRENT OWNER 2314 VILLANOVA RD SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1939 403 -29 -133 JOSEPH A & BARBARA THOMSON OR CURRENT OWNER 5182 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1909 403 -29 -136 NANCY MATHEWS OR CURRENT OWNER 5140 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1909 403 -29 -139 AZMY I IBRAHIM OR CURRENT OWNER 5094 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1907 403 -29 -142 SORIN L & PETRUTA NEGRU OR CURRENT OWNER 5052 BOBBIE AVE SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1907 403 -57 -049 ALF L OFTEDAHL OR CURRENT OWNER 2302 VILLANOVA RD SAN JOSE CA 95130 -1939. is • • Attachment 3 11 `r I PROPOSED ADDITION 18344 Baylor Ave, Saratoga ABBREVIATIONS A 8 ANCIO BMT F. FILM RB RUBBER BASE A G ACM SIISPBCm C3M F.D. RaM MAN RD Rallls 0001 ASC ACaISF SIISPDDED COW FE FIE DTINGlm EN 03FOW OI A.D. AREA IMAN FE HIE OnSURS EA fftt RFIFOICNO _9 Tt 2nd 12 ft N/A 12.97 ft _ 51.62ft 30.99 ft 2nd 35 ft N/A 43.75 ft MAXIMUM HEIGHT SCALE: N.T.S ADN AI IM RIC FNE h1eMET REY was AT A001SOCAL TEE RTES MT HEAD EOm RY Wall 1871 S.F. Second Floor Sam RN. RAN t117FA IFAER E mum BaALD Ell R" RE REDEOD ®/ND BOAOI FL/TIN FID01 S S" BDHl11110 FACE an iD6/y3 OFF SMM 54 STTaµP DISPF1M BOLT BDIM H0M FRAME SIGN GRAN FM FRAINC SECT Sem CAB CADET F7G FODTIIG SH ! P SHELF AND POE CAR CAIFET SIT SLEET CB CAICH BASIN GA GNIff SALT MR. SHEET METAL CNALWIM ® G'RSIN WALL BOARD SIMILAR COW ED SIR SEALANT aR CDIAMC G91 GALVANIZED SHIFT so SHEET METAL SCREE CA COISOOCBOI.DNT METAL SPECS SPENICA710NS C.L. CEINTEM LIME OR S.S. STAINLESS STEiL as CELM HV RAMOM SL Sim aA am MDR IEANR S1DICr SHMICRRGL CHIN COW MASONY UNIT HM BARDEAE S6 SELF TAPPING SCAM COL CM1114 MI HOLDS METAL sISP SUSPOCED COHC WNQEIE NORZ HOMAL M TAa®OND CON CONMC 011 HR HAMPAL CCNT COfORIOK HIT HOW TA 700ID im C.P. CR CEMENT RAS70 COD ROLLD POLL T N61AM NEd lE S WALL C.T. CERAMIC IIE ID 101001 DOM TIP IYPIGL CIR OVER LAN LAMINAE OIL DMM E MAT 1111170ft UON 1NESS (A EIS OFF OfRECll01 MAX MC YA7EIY METAL CHAMEL IM DIET ETK M OCH IEOHAMrx VDIT VERTAL DIE OF DETAL FauNrAN WMIMA MET METAL V.I.F. V63Y N FIELD pit OOOR MN MwN %CT 011. COP09H01 TAE 06 DONLSPOIrt Ma: MIASORY OPDED VIC M MAIL COYO M MD ow DES 0011111112101 GRAM K INN! NORTH N NOOT T N COIIRACT l- ■ME/ �/EIOED E EAST HITS NOT TD SCALE WALL OOypEG R,Mtw EA° a 1 ME aC ONE HOD ON COW E .,,110. EDOD .DDS EtEC ELECI00L a'N 01 E I BE11 ELEVA7H01 P PC[ PANT P �/p ME Wnuff RATERPO am DIAEERm PERM PBOM EEIC ¢DGUALC E111E1 COW PA PAMC IWDENE 1 AMOE or DPAMSIO1 P_ _ PIASDD f CFIm LIE DTf DEIIOR Di11ML9ER R P � f f CAM EU PLAN P.P.T. PESSUE PESE1wA1ME 7EATM PS PROEC= SCREEN FID PAPDt TOEL MSPBLSFII GENERAL SYMBOLS O Iva oEIMM„DN NEE Q ETVD C0N611NCIDN Man: O COM MAW AO FNN70E TYPE 5 @—- CMUN REFEiDICE LINE ' EFETM PANT %, MEET Mitrt7t OETAL IEFflE>KE �F PLANNING CODE DATA SCOPE OF WORK ZONE DISTRICT R- 1- 10-000 Realefenfiel C9C2001. UBC1997 OCCUPANCY GROUP LOT SIZE GROSS 8190 sq. ft. +/- NET 7840 sq. ft. +/- Age of Building 48 yrs Roofing Material 40 yr Composite Shingle Average Site Slope LEVEL REVISION DATE Allowable Floor Area 40 X = 3136 sq. ft. DATE SETBACKS 1114A8 4 Allowed Existing Proposed Sidet1st(L/R) 27 101190 3 fftt as , _9 Tt 2nd 12 ft N/A 12.97 ft Rear 1st 25 ft 51.62ft 30.99 ft 2nd 35 ft N/A 43.75 ft MAXIMUM HEIGHT SCALE: N.T.S U H I UT A Allowed TWO STORIES Not to exceed 26 feet 21 feet FLOOR AREA Existing Proposed First Floor 1500 S.F. 1871 S.F. Second Floor Garage 400 S.F- TOTAL AREA 12910 Sq. feet BUILDING CODE C9C2001. UBC1997 OCCUPANCY GROUP Single Family & Type of Construction Exterior Siding Material � STUCCO/WOOD Roofing Material 40 yr Composite Shingle IMPREVIOUS SITE COVERAGE Existing Proposed Structure 976 Driveway F4A Cn fpe� 15% Backyard 350 i¢ feet / d 4 247 Sn eat 376 INDEX OF DRAWINGS h(1. WHIT A -0 COVER SHEET 1 BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY A -1.1 EXISTING SITE PLAN A -1.2 NEW SITE PLAN A -2.1 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN A -2.2 NEW FLOOR PLAN A -2.3 ROOF PLAN A -3.1 EXISTING BUILDING ELEVATIONS A -3.2 NEW BUILDING ELEVATIONS A -4.1 CROSS SECTIONS A -5.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN N /-Ll`1 NIJ T -\/ f 21_ A A l 1) To add 371 s¢ ft to the first floor 2) Remodel Kitchen, Uving Room k Entry 3) Add 639 nft 2nd story addition 4) Remodel driveeay R bodyerd pad GENERAL NOTES L A COPY OF PARIS 1 t Z TIME 24 WALL E MEPT ON 7ME A891E AT ALL DES 2. ALL aWNE 011166 AND AODBDA TO E MO BY THE AROIIECT AND TIE OINK. 1 ALL TESIS 7D CdfIRM 70 THE EMMOBTiS OF SE"CCMOI 4-3(11. TTME 24 AND APPROVED T t I SHEEL • 1ME LAITY OF If NSPMM SHALL E N ACCODANCE WIH SOW +-342 S SMPEMYBOI (IF 0061PUCII011 BY DILIDD OFFTfAL N ACOODNEE WIN Sii1Dl1 +-334 L COITRACCTOt ,B@FCIOt . ARCHITECT. AND DF,•M SHALL SIMMIT WER ED W"M ( SSS - e ) N AOCCOIMANCE DN SECHONS 4-Ma) AND 4441. 7. IME ARCMIECT AND IME SID1CILMAL MM SHALL MM THEN MITES N ACCdDfVICE WMH SE= +-333(e) AND 4-341. L 1 E COO1IAC101 SIVI L PERFORM 16 DILM N ACCODARTE IM SEC= +-341 1PE NiBIT 0. 1HE CMTMACT DOOINEN6 6 70 IBM ! 70 BIER AM ADOIIMI FED b au 1 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FE. I 1 P 1' ' V H -,+ •• 7 4 �' I x 1 d J J ! S f f i t P M! '<• vanCx IBS. sr , OAIVE,,, .._._..._..� SITE MAP TIM surveying - engineering - architecture 526 Calero Ave, San Jose, CA 95123 Tel: (408) 425 -4523 Fax: (408 ) 226 -3475 Email: infoOtranvu.com SEAL: NO. Co66201 Do. 12AIlbe IV a DATE0911 -20(15 DRAWN BY: VLN CHECKED BY: T. T. REVISION DATE REVISION DATE 1 1114A8 4 Sams 2 SIM 5 101190 3 71110 APN # 403 -28 -069 COVER SHEET 18344 Baylor Ave. Saratoga, CA 95070 OWNER HIEN NGHIEM & KIM LIEN TU 18344 Baylor Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 SCALE: N.T.S U H I UT A 1 PROLECT No- I sNQR: 1 t� 1 ''� 254.31 I 2 .93 2 .99 1/a r fi . _ " �? I I EXISTING ADJACENT HOUSE 25 . I (E) SIDE SETBACK 7.43' I PROPERTY LINE (TYPE}- REQUIRED SIDE SET BACK T X 253.99 /J 256.06 255.80 172 WOOD FENCE (TYP>) 256.08 I I I CHECKED BY: T. T. 159 - (E) FRONT SET BACK 25A' M REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK 25 REVISION ., 3d Cam r @h fits 1 1114M ' � • 3 & Ile EXISTING SITE PLAN \ 2 256.07 - - O O 10 (E) PI E UN 257.5 183 Ra A, NOE @ A b SCALE: 118" = 1' 4) Remodel driveway backyard pad V � x 255.92 1.6 E T N+ � 62 � ' QgA � ae � .S .e'A° H+i.4ezY k maa,0 cnW- a`' 3838.85 x 255.22 I 0 (E)) REAR SETBACK 51.67 REQUIRED REAR SETBACK 2 O VJ I x 2 0 256.40 256. - 1 I 1 (E) ELM TR (10-TRUNK) 255.65 25676 22 I APN 403 -28- 069 x�t55 7 Building 173 a B 158 Q Age= 48 � 256.26 x 256.62 OOD FENCE (TYP.) 255.17 256.41 257.9 254.38 I 254.13 254.43 256.49 x 256.59 ' Q I � � w i Q 254.61 ® i m E_ I 256.21 25627 256.36 254 .1 b, ^ 4t ROPERTY (1 YP.) 1 ( ) TREE (24' UN X 256.73 2582 ph IF Lww ' - - - - 20.5 .4'I --i PR LINE (TYP >) (E) SIDE SET BACK 7. 9' WOOD FENCE nYP>) 1 ' REQUIRED SIDE SET BACK T I 1 254.7 i 174 I II 2 EXISTING ADJACENT HOUSE I I 157 I ' I 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 I I I I I GRAPHIC SCALE 1 I 71 MAP I I NTS. Q1r� 1/a r fi . _ " �? DATE11 -11-M SCOPE OF WORK CHECKED BY: T. T. REVL910N DATE REVISION ., 3d Cam r @h fits 1 1114M z 1) To add 321 sq. ft to the first floor 3 & Ile EXISTING SITE PLAN 2) Remodel Kitchen, Living Room Entry ems x HIEN NGHIEM & 3) Add 573 sq.ft 2nd story addition 18344 Baylor Ave 183 Ra A, NOE @ A b SCALE: 118" = 1' 4) Remodel driveway backyard pad qam 4 - A 6r#a AR � 4 4 lll///iii::I T N+ �rH } QgA � ae � .S .e'A° H+i.4ezY k maa,0 cnW- a`' TUM surveying - engineering - architecture 526 Calero Ave, San Jose, CA 5123 Tel: (408) 425 -4523 Fax: (408 ) 226 -3475 Email: infoOtranvu.com SEAL Q1r� 1/a r DATE11 -11-M DRAWN BY: VLN CHECKED BY: T. T. REVL910N DATE REVISION DATE 1 1114M z SF.YDS 3 718A8 EXISTING SITE PLAN 18344 Baylor Ave. Saratoga, CA 95070 OWNER HIEN NGHIEM & KIM LIEN TU 18344 Baylor Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 SCALE: 118" = 1' PROJECTNO: I SHEET: 1 0/h r1 • • VICINITY MAP N75. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1) To add 371 sq. ft to the first floor 2) Remodel Kitchen, Living Room & Entry 3) Add 639 sq.ft 2nd story addition 4) Remodel driveway & backyard pad BUILDING SETBACK VERIFICATION NOTE: Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the LLS of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per the approved plans DESIGNER'S STATEMENT This plot plan correctly represents a plot plan made by me or under my direction. I hereby STATE that to the best of my knowledge all provisions of applicable State laws and local ordinances have complied with. I hereby further State that all proposed grades, elevations, and contours delineated upon this plot plan are based upon a boundary and topographic survey by CISTRAN GROUP INC. dated 1/11/2006 that was indicated thereon by the surveyors there as being based upon City of Saratoga datum. '°°Fwr°�r ' 1 rrWA 7 PW, 0/r, 547E T6iAM surveying - engineering - architecture 526 Colero Ave, San Jose, CA 95123 Tel: (408) 425 -4523 Fax: (408 ) 226 -3475 Email: info®tranvu.com SEAL DATE:11 -11 -206 DRAWN BY: VLN CHECKEDBY:T.T. REVISION DATE REVISION DATE inINB 4 67A18 10/1608 71808 7/L607 NEW SITE PLAN 18344 Baylor Ave. Saratoga, CA 95070 OWNER HIEN NGHIEM & KIM LIEN TU 18344 Baylor Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 SCALE: 1/8" = 1' 1 PRMCT NO: I SIffET: 050833 A1.2 I EXISTING ADJACENT HOUSE I I 1[ 254.31 2 2 .9 .99 I 172 I 159 1 253'93 I I PROPERTY LINE (TYP. X 253.99 (E)) SIDE SETBACK 7.43' REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK T WOOD FENCE (TYP.) 256.06 255.80 256.06 I - - - FRONT SE BACK MV REQUIRED FR NTT SETBACK 25' Q-0 �01� X 254.62 \\LL\ f` tt -25. ' GRASS x 255.22 (E) PI (ir E E u 257.5 i f • ' a � � O X 255.92 (E) B RRETB I[ 256.58 256.40 R S1.67 S BACK 2 • 2 v \� 256 $ i 1 (E) ELM T 10- TR NK) i I •255.65 ` 256 8 54.22 j Q n - � R B 158 I 8 P d REAR SETBACK UIRED FLOOR REAR SETBACK 35' ' j 255'17 2 a s ' nd FIL 257.9 OOD FENCE (TYP.) X 256.62 254.43 ' I 254.38 254.13 I _STORY S9 e C 0/q v -- i 4N0 FLOOR LINE � O j T Q DRIVEWAY I 254 61 y rsC I e 3.75' yi 30.9 (N) REAR SETBACK 30.99 REQUIRED REAR SETBACK 2 .00' �j I 254 FIREHYD 1 256.27 ■ x 258.73 258' ROPERTY (TYP.) .31 255.54 4E) TREE (2 T K) (CUT,PER IT ` 254.79 - - - 1 I� 1 -20.55 I .79 PROPERTY LINE (TYP.) (E)1ST STORY SIDE SETBACK 7.9 (N) 2nd STORY SIDE SETBACK 12.9T WOOD FENCE (TYP.) REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK T REQUIRED 2nd STORY SIDE SETBACK 17 I 2�' j I 174 I I )1256.12 EXISTING ADJACENT HOUSE 157 ' I I 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 I j I GRAPHIC SCALE I X255.78 j VICINITY MAP N75. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1) To add 371 sq. ft to the first floor 2) Remodel Kitchen, Living Room & Entry 3) Add 639 sq.ft 2nd story addition 4) Remodel driveway & backyard pad BUILDING SETBACK VERIFICATION NOTE: Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the LLS of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per the approved plans DESIGNER'S STATEMENT This plot plan correctly represents a plot plan made by me or under my direction. I hereby STATE that to the best of my knowledge all provisions of applicable State laws and local ordinances have complied with. I hereby further State that all proposed grades, elevations, and contours delineated upon this plot plan are based upon a boundary and topographic survey by CISTRAN GROUP INC. dated 1/11/2006 that was indicated thereon by the surveyors there as being based upon City of Saratoga datum. '°°Fwr°�r ' 1 rrWA 7 PW, 0/r, 547E T6iAM surveying - engineering - architecture 526 Colero Ave, San Jose, CA 95123 Tel: (408) 425 -4523 Fax: (408 ) 226 -3475 Email: info®tranvu.com SEAL DATE:11 -11 -206 DRAWN BY: VLN CHECKEDBY:T.T. REVISION DATE REVISION DATE inINB 4 67A18 10/1608 71808 7/L607 NEW SITE PLAN 18344 Baylor Ave. Saratoga, CA 95070 OWNER HIEN NGHIEM & KIM LIEN TU 18344 Baylor Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 SCALE: 1/8" = 1' 1 PRMCT NO: I SIffET: 050833 A1.2 4'� 10 1789 sq. ft. OZ 111 sq. ft. TOTAL EXISTING FLOOR AREA = 1900 + /- sq. ft. TO BE DEMDLIMM EXISTING FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1' TUM surveying - engineering - architecture 526 Calero Ave, San Jose, CA Tel: (408) 425 -4523 Fax: (408 ) 226 -3475 Email: info*tranvu.com FSM N� , a 9W 12AII08 or IV DATE.11 -11 -2005 DRAWN BY: VLN CHECKED BY: T.T. REVISON DATE REVISION DATE 1 1114M 2 SF.r08 APN # 403 -28 -069 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN 18344 Baylor Ave. Saratoga, CA 95070 OWNER auw JMM W-W KIM LIEN TU 18344 Baylor Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 SCALE: 3/16" = 1' A� 7—M ? JOY - S Fa OIOLT H OUT PLACE � og e A Omnd OA1�AOi Q ►ALT OOW 13'6' 75' -7 78'x' s a N� �'-,m b 13'6 -2''--- �'� -3'6' p 0 m1oL: MUNWAft �1A'A s, V-cr u'1• TO BE DEMDLIMM EXISTING FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1' TUM surveying - engineering - architecture 526 Calero Ave, San Jose, CA Tel: (408) 425 -4523 Fax: (408 ) 226 -3475 Email: info*tranvu.com FSM N� , a 9W 12AII08 or IV DATE.11 -11 -2005 DRAWN BY: VLN CHECKED BY: T.T. REVISON DATE REVISION DATE 1 1114M 2 SF.r08 APN # 403 -28 -069 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN 18344 Baylor Ave. Saratoga, CA 95070 OWNER HIEN NGHIEM & KIM LIEN TU 18344 Baylor Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 SCALE: 3/16" = 1' P l-cF TNM: I SNE7: _. _... 23 { NOTE: GGM m z= 2 iemm AR wiowa RM smoa sKM Dm ®m G1M/L nit ! AROOAIYI 2010410 AND IOPAL OWL M PWAM nR M GRNO. 10O l OWATAO. M GRAM OWL INK A OWK AA OT WR�G � iR IROdM OOMOIMM OWL W► GL7RA A OOOILM IFORI AIlIIGTA21 NO NP11 11 M TD FM MKO AIO An100111OM TO 6. la W, M RM FLOW M 1M 110AT7 ■ 1® ON1 AT b M RM1NL 170/•tM M MOM W RM ■ AKUOt ARDR AMA MTO1 ONOI NO M MYaNI[Q OOO NO OM® AT M RD2O® omm 7 1 7 — / / / / / / / 1 CE'.iNG� I I 5, iV LACE 02 183 sq. ft. 03 383 sq. ft. ® 375 sq. ft. 05 573 sq. ft. © 684 sq. ft. 07 83 sq. ft. TOTAL 1ST FLOOR AREA = 2271 sq. ft. TOTAL 1 ST & 2nd FLOOR AREA = 2978 sq. ft. 00 M ROOT 3 W DRAWN BY: VLN CHECKED BY: T. T. J // � N L=L 111 1 412/08 2 51508 5 10NB08 / 0 / 7111. R W 222RDm 2 Cr 1 la � TARLT 11IM1 1ST FLOOR PLAN T 1T 259 sq. ft. 3 ( 51 sq. ft. 0 49 sq. ft. ® 280 sq. ft. O TOTAL 2nd FLOOR AREA = 639 sq. ft TUM surveying - engineering - architecture 526 Colero Ave San Jose, CA 95123 Tel: (408) 425 -4523 Fax: (408 ) 226 -3475 Email: info®tranvu.com SEAL: °wt Na cose20o 4. 12/2 + /« ry DF DATE-1141L2005 DRAWN BY: VLN CHECKED BY: T. T. /// // UT DATE 1 111 1 412/08 2 51508 5 10NB08 / 0 / 7111. I'< 7I� Saratoga, CA 95070 OWNER HIEN NGHIEM & KIM LIEN TU 18344 Baylor Ave A SCALE: 3/16" = V 7 J 1L L11 Z J 0 - 0 LL 0 z N 3 L.AUN�A..IY C • � 1ST FLOOR PLAN T 1T 259 sq. ft. 3 ( 51 sq. ft. 0 49 sq. ft. ® 280 sq. ft. O TOTAL 2nd FLOOR AREA = 639 sq. ft TUM surveying - engineering - architecture 526 Colero Ave San Jose, CA 95123 Tel: (408) 425 -4523 Fax: (408 ) 226 -3475 Email: info®tranvu.com SEAL: °wt Na cose20o 4. 12/2 + /« ry DF DATE-1141L2005 DRAWN BY: VLN CHECKED BY: T. T. REVISION DATE REVISION DATE 1 111 1 412/08 2 51508 5 10NB08 GGM DDM 1C-' 2 r 1ST FLOOR PLAN T 1T 259 sq. ft. 3 ( 51 sq. ft. 0 49 sq. ft. ® 280 sq. ft. O TOTAL 2nd FLOOR AREA = 639 sq. ft TUM surveying - engineering - architecture 526 Colero Ave San Jose, CA 95123 Tel: (408) 425 -4523 Fax: (408 ) 226 -3475 Email: info®tranvu.com SEAL: °wt Na cose20o 4. 12/2 + /« ry DF DATE-1141L2005 DRAWN BY: VLN CHECKED BY: T. T. REVISION DATE REVISION DATE 1 111 1 412/08 2 51508 5 10NB08 3 7/80 8 ?ltIN7 NEW FLOOR PLAN 18344 Baylor Ave. Saratoga, CA 95070 OWNER HIEN NGHIEM & KIM LIEN TU 18344 Baylor Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 SCALE: 3/16" = V III PRNECT NQ I SHEET: I I e TUM surveying - engineering - architecture 526 Calero Ave, San Jose, CA 95123 Tel: (408) 425 -4523 Fax: (408 ) 226 -3475 Email: info®tranvu.com SEAL Dw VM or DATB11 -11 -20 DRAWN BY: VLN CHECKED BY: T. T. REVISION DATE REVISION DATE 1 1114M 4 am 2 sw8 s 1Dd1898 3 7898 ROOF PLAN 18344 Baylor Ave. Saratoga, CA 95070 OWNER HIEN NGHIEM & KIM LIEN TU 18344 Baylor Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 SCALE: 1/4' = 1' .. 4 1 PRDJECT NO,. I SHEET: I q a Z to 0 C*4 E to 0 w to co 04 0) C,4 c 0. 04 > Old < < -Nis U co till IM T (D 00 0 C:) (D 0 '4- t I I killitill I'll 'I k I 0) �— 0 At 10. 07) I (jo c CN 5 E UMMUM to V) U- LIJ a as I Z 0 w Old till IM T (D I I killitill I'll 'I k I I At 10. I IIIIIIII I Z 0 UMMUM W) It"It I I mill it ItIl HIM it '111 littit it lilt I I I ti Itil tillt it till CIS I'M uIll cn 00 En m 00 —j "I 1 11 III 1 11 it Cl) as I Z 0 w till IM T (D I I killitill I'll 'I k I I At 10. I IIIIIIII I Z 0 UMMUM as I w till IM T (D I I killitill I'll 'I k I I I IIIIIIII I UMMUM It"It I I mill it ItIl HIM it '111 littit it lilt I I I ti Itil tillt it till I'M uIll "I I ut I it io "I 1 11 III 1 11 it I III z it 0 till IIIIII it, Itit Illitit I I I "llm LLI I IIIII, lot MUM, It ilittillitill I I I it 111111" till 11111 Ml 'It" Ir ull IIIII I a it 1 11 Hill all, as I 7�dg z 0 w L LU w T (D 7�dg z 0 w L LU an a I m on on NONE m 0 m jW"i h - Ij 60AU] ildamind FINISH A -A SECTION FINISH FLOOR B -B SECTION r--"-1 W14 STAIRS CODE: FLOOR TO FLOOR RISE = 9' NUMBER OF RISERS =14 HEIGHT OF EACH RISER = Vyw TOTAL HEIGHT OF RISERS =8'111V RISERS OVERAGE OR UNDERAGE (t) _ e" NUMBER OF TREADS =13 WIDTH OF EACH TREAD = 9'3/16" WELL OPENING FOR 6'-8" HEADROOM =10' 2Y52" ANGLE OF INCLINE = 38" 5' LENGTH OF CARRIAGE = 13' 6%2" TUM surveying - engineering - architecture 526 Calero Ave, San Jose, CA Tel: (408) 425 -4523 Fax: (408 ) 226 -3475 Email: info*tronvu.com DATF -11- 11-2005 DRAWN BY: VLN CHECKED BY: T. T. REVISION DATE REVISION DATE 1 111/006 2 5!50018 CROSS SECTIONS 18344 Baylor Ave. Saratoga, CA 95070 OWNER HIEN NGHIEM & KIM LIEN TU 18344 Baylor Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 SCALE: 1/4"= 1' PROJECT NO: SHEET: 23 4 DRIVE WAY BAYLOR AVE LANSCAPE PLAN TUM - surveying - engineering - architecture 526 Colero Ave, Son Jose, CA 95123 Tel: (408) 425 -4523 Fax: (408 ) 226 -3475 Email: info®tronvu.com SEAL WFEM� M 0056 a M.P. +�N +/a Ia DATE:11 -11 -2005 DRAWN BY: VLN CHECKED BY: T. T. REVISION DATE REVISION DATE 1 1/14/08 9 BI2/08 2 S&M 3 -'/SODS LANDSCAPE PLAN 18344 Baylor Ave. Saratoga, CA 95070 OWNER HIEN NGHIEM & KIM LIEN TU 18344 Baylor Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 SCALE: 1/10" = 1' 4.. PROJEOLOI. In 0 4$ W "I WE, ry °_� ,� ti �. �` ,� ', � REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • • Application No./Location: Type of Application: Applicant/Owner: Staff Planner: Date: APN: Item 2 07- 225/18596 Arbolado Way Modification of Approved Plans Rockwood Design /Ajay & Kaajal Narain Therese M. SchmieAYCP, Associate Planner March 14, 2007 397 -06 -092 Department Head: / John Livingstone, AICP, Director ......_... MDN UGRAC I T— VADD NWY � II - D L Mal`e�IGE. MprTrpWrJao KVA j - ................� j 9 •�• wpepoeKw..— / \ Du Ro J ; _..... I / - \' Buffer zones amund 18596 Arbolado Way aU70ko 111 Q500 Feet __........... ,._— ......_...— ........... Street Labels . N Streets y. .. .. .... _ ... ...; �/ � •1 Parcels .._ .. ................. ... —.._. �� ft .. ".� ............... _........ — ........_ _...._.7 : 18596 Arbolado Way Application No. 07 -225; 18596 Arbolado Way/Narain EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY: Application filed: 01/17/07 Application' complete: 02/06/07 Notice published: 02/28/07 Mailing completed: 02/20/07 Posting completed: 03/08/07 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests a Modification to a Design Review Approval granted by the Planning Commission on March 22, 2006, which consisted of demolition of approximately 38% of the existing exterior walls of a single -story single - family residence, and constructing a second -story addition, a small detached accessory pool structure, and modify the existing architectural style from a Modern Ranch home to an International design. The Modification would allow for full demolition of the residence. The approved foot -print and architectural style and details would not change. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the Modification to a Design Review Approval with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. Staff is not recommending Permanent Conditions of Approval. 2 • • Ll • C7 Application No. 07 -225; 18596 Arbolado Way/Narain STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R -1- 40,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: RVLD (Residential Very Low Density) MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE: 40,205 Sq. Ft. (Gross & Net) AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: 7.18% GRADING REQUIRED: None Proposed rnv�r.� 1 LC11 A. Approved Proposal Code Re uirements Lot Home & Garage 4,341 sq. ft. Coverage: Pool Structure 100 sq. ft. Hardscape 6,547 sq. ft. Max. Allowable — TOTAL PROPOSED 10,988 sq. ft. (27 %) No Changes 14,072 sq. ft (35 %) Floor Area: Home & Garage First Floor 3,568 sq. ft. Second Floor 1,556 sq. ft. Garage 773 sq. ft. Pool Structure 100 sq. ft. Max. Allowable — TOTAL PROPOSED 5,997 sq. ft. No Changes 6,020 sq. ft. Min. Requirement Setbacks: 1 -sto 2 -story 1 -story 2 -story Front 30' -2" 54'4" 30 ft. 30 ft. Rear 101' -4" 107' -0" 50 ft. 60 ft. Side (N) 23' -10" 58'-9" 20 ft. 25 ft. Side (S) 46' -5" 89' -8" 20 ft. 25 ft. Side (E) 35' -11" 71'-11" No Changes 20 ft. 25 ft. Max. Allowable Height: Proposed Residence 23 ft. 8 in. 26 ft. Proposed Accessory Structure 10 ft No Changes 12 ft. 3 Application No. 07 -225; 18596 Arbolado Way/Narain ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposal is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single - family residences. PROJECT DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting a modification to the Design Approval granted by the Planning Commission on March 22, 2006. City Code Section 16- 05.035(c)(2) requires modifications to plans approved by the Planning Commission be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. Upon further review of the existing structure the applicant has determined that a full demolition instead of a minor remodel and addition is required. The applicant had initially requested that only 38% of the exterior walls would be removed. The project was advertised as a minor remodel and addition, not as a new residence. The proposed modification would not change the approved foot - print, architectural style or details of the new structure. Story Poles While the City's Municipal Code does not require story poles to be installed by an applicant, staff strongly suggests that the applicant provide the poles at least two weeks prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing whenever a two- story, or greater, structure is proposed. The poles provide a visual representation for the Planning Commission immediate neighbors, and the community. The applicant has chosen not to install story poles. Neighbor Correspondence The applicant has chosen not to circulate the proposed modification to his neighbors. Geotechnical Clearance Geotechnical Clearance was not required for the original project or the proposed Modification. Trees An arborist report was prepared during the initial approval process. There are fifteen (15) trees of Ordinance -size that are either situated on or overhang the subject site. They include eleven (11) Monterey Pines, two (2) Coast Live Oaks, one (1) Deodar Cedar and one (1) European White Birch. One (1) tree is proposed for removal, a 12" European White Birch. Mitigation for its loss has been included in the conditions of approval and shall consist of installation of one (1) tree of 24 -inch box size and one 15- gallon size tree, which is roughly equivalent to the tree's appraised value of $620.00. Proposed trees and locations of said trees shall be reviewed and approved by the City's arborist prior to issuance of building permits. A bond in the amount of $33,400.00 shall be required to ensure that conditions of 0 • • • Application No. 07 -225, 18596 Arbolado Way/Narain approval are adhered too. The proposed Modification would not require additional tree protection measures. General Plan Findings The proposed modification would not impact the original General Plan Findings and the proposal would still be consistent with the following General Plan Policies: Conservation Element Policy 6.0 - Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. The proposed changes to the approved plans will not substantially change the bulk and . mass of the building, modify approved building materials including paint color and would not impact the rural atmosphere of Saratoga. As condition, the applicant would meet the intent of the Policy and is consistent with the City's General Plan. Land Use Element Policy 5.0 -The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the Findings required for Design Approval. Design Review Findings The proposed project is consistent with all the following Design Review findings stated in MCS 15- 45.080: a Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bull (e) Compatible bulk and height. (f) Current grading and erosion control methods. (g) Design policies and techniques. The requested Modification would allow for full demolition instead of partial demolition of a single - family residence. The proposed Modification would not change the architectural style, materials, bulk, height, location, alter the amount of grading required, or require removal of additional trees or natural vegetation of the project approved by the Planning Commission on March 22, 2006. Therefore, the original Findings made by the Commission would still apply. The original Findings have been incorporated into the attached resolution, which will supersede the applicant's previous approving resolution. Application No. 07 -225; 18596 Arbolado Way/Narain Conclusion Staff has concluded that all of the Design Review findings can be made in the affirmative 40 and the proposed modification is consistent with the General Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find the application exempt from CEQA and approve the application for Modification to Design Review Approval with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution of Approval. 2. Affidavit of Mailing Notices. Public Hearing Notice, Mailing labels for project notification. 3. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A." • • 3 F--] Attachment 1 is APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. . Application No. 07 -225 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Narain: 18596 Arbolado Way WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for a Modification to a Design Review Approval granted by the Planning Commission on March 22, 2006, which consisted of an approval to demolish approximately 38% of the existing exterior walls of a single -story single - family detached residence, and construct a second -story addition, a small detached accessory pool structure, and modify the existing architectural style from a Modern Ranch home to an International design. The proposed Modification would allow full demolition of the residence. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, The proposal is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single - family residences. WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Modification of Design Review Approval, and is consistent with the following General Plan Policies: Conservation Element Policy 6.0 - Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. The proposed changes to the approved plans will not substantially change the bulk and mass of the building, modify approved building materials including paint color and would not impact the rural atmosphere of Saratoga. As condition, the applicant would meet the intent of the Policy and is consistent with the City's General Plan. Land Use Element Policy 5.0 -The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the Findings required for Design Approval. 0 Application No. 07- 225;18596 Arbolado Way/1Varain WHEREAS, the applicant met the burden of proof required to support the findings required for the original Design Review application approved by adoption of Resolution No. 06 -023 by the Planning Commission on March 22, 2006, as set forth below: (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The maximum height of the proposed two -story dwelling is 23 -feet 8- inches. The structure will be approximately 30 -feet 2- inches from Arbolado Way, 101 -feet 4- inches from the rear property line, and ranging from 23 -feet 10- inches to 35 -feet 11- inches from the side- yard property lines. The proposed footprint is in essentially the same location as the existing footprint with a small expansion to accommodate the proposed reorientation of the garage entrance. The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the views from Arbolado Way or the privacy of abutting neighbors. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. One (1) protected tree is proposed for removal and fourteen (14) other protected size trees could potential be affected by the proposal; however, as conditioned and mitigated the proposal will preserve the existing natural landscape. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. The proposal is not requesting removal of Native and/or Heritage Trees. In addition, the proposal, as conditioned, would not impact Native and/or Heritage Trees. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. The applicant is proposing a neutral color pallet for the exterior building, window trim and roofing materials as well as incorporating varying rooflines and exterior building materials to reduce the perception of excessive bulk. (e) Compatible bulk and height. Residences in the area are predominately one and two- story. The proposal is compatible in bulk and height with the neighborhood. (f) Current grading and erosion control methods. Since the building site is relatively flat and the proposed addition is in the general area of the existing residence, no grading is proposed. In addition, the proposal shall conform to the City's current grading and erosion control standards. (g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to all of the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above and staff report. WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Modification to Design Review approval, and the following findings have been determined: • (h) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. 2 Application No. 07 -225; 18596 Arbolado Way/Narain (i) Preserve Natural Landscape. (j) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. (k) Minimize perception of excessive bulb (1) Compatible bulk and height. (m) Current grading and erosion control methods. (n) Design policies and techniques. The requested Modification would allow for full demolition instead of partial demolition of a single - family residence. The proposed Modification would not change the architectural style, materials, bulk, height, location, alter the amount of grading required, or require removal of additional trees or natural vegetation of the project approved by the Planning Commission on March 22, 2006. Therefore, the original Findings made by the Commission would still apply. WHEREAS, this Resolution shall supersede Resolution No. 06 -023, which was approved by the Planning Commission on March 22, 06. Now, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the application for Modification to Design Review approval is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: PERMANENT CONDITONS OF APPROVAL — None CURRENT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL CONDITIONS — COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A" date stamped January 17, 2007, incorporated by reference. All changes to the approved plans must be submitted in writing with plans showing the changes and are subject to the Community Development Director's approval. 2. The project shall utilize materials illustrated on a materials board date stamped December 21, 2005. • 3. The following shall be required and/or included as to the plans submitted to the • Building Division for the building plan check review process: 3 Application No. 07 -225; 18596 Arbolado Way/Narain • a. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans incorporating this Resolution as a separate plan page. b. The following note shall be included: "A maximum of one wood- burning fireplace is permitted and it shall be equipped with a gas starter. All other fireplaces shall be gas burning." c. The following note shall be included verifying building setback: "Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the Licensed Land Surveyor of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per approved plans." 4. A storm water retention plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval indicating how all storm water will be retained on -site, and incorporating the New Development and Construction - Best Management Practices. If all storm water cannot be retained on -site due to topographic, soils or other constraints, an explanatory note shall be provided on the plan. 5. Landscape plan shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff, promote surface infiltration and minimize use of fertilizers and pesticides that can contribute to water pollution. 6. To the extent feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. 7. To the extent feasible, pest resistant landscaping plants shall be used throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. 8. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. 9. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. 10. Staff shall not approve downgrading to the exterior appearance of the approved residence. Downgrades may include, but are not limited to, garage doors, architectural detailing, stonework, columns, shutters, driveway materials, or similar items. Any exterior changes to approved plans resulting in a downgrade shall require filing an additional application and fees for review by the Planning Commission as a modification to approved plans. Any other exterior changes to the approved plans, which are not deemed a downgrade by staff, shall require a Zoning Clearance issued by • the Community Development Director with payment of appropriate fees. 4 Application No. 07 -225; 18596 Arbolado Way/Narain 11. All processing fees, in the form of deposit accounts on file with the community development department, shall be reconciled with a minimum $500.00 surplus balance M at all times. In the event that the balance is less than $500.00, all staff work on the project shall cease until the balance is restored to a minimum $500.00. FIRE DISTRICT 12. Applicant shall comply with all Fire Department conditions. PUBLIC WORKS 13. Applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit for improvements in the City right -of- way prior to commencement of the work. ARBORIST REPORT 14. All recommendations in the City Arborist's Reports dated January 16, 2006 and incorporated herein by this reference shall be followed and incorporated into the plans. This includes, but is not limited to: a. Prior to issuance of Building Permits the applicant shall obtain a tree bond, or similar funding mechanism, in the amount of $33,400.00. b. To offset the impact of removing tree #15 (European White Birch) the applicant shall install trees, as provided in the arborist report, to its appraised value of $620.00. c. The Arborist Reports shall be incorporated, as a separate plan page, to the construction plan set and the grading plan set and all applicable measures noted on the site and grading plans. d. A note shall be included on the site plan stating that no construction equipment or private vehicles shall park or be stored within the drip -line of any ordinance protected trees on the site. 15. The City Arborist shall inspect the site to verify compliance with tree protective measures. The bond required by paragraph 13a above shall be released after the planting of required replacement trees, a site inspection by the City Arborist finding compliance with all tree- related conditions contained in this Resolution, and payment of any outstanding Arborist fees. CITY ATTORNEY 16. Owner and Applicant agree to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. • Application No. 07 -225; 18596 Arbolado Way/Narain Section 2. A Building Permit must be issued and construction commenced within 36 months from the date of the original approval, which was March 22, 2006. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15 -90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 14th day of March 2007 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Linda R. Rodgers Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: John F. Livingstone, AICP Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date • Attachment 2 • 0 0 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, Denise Kaspar being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the 20th day of February , 2007, that I deposited 35 Notices in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to -wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15- 45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property described as: APN: 397 -06 -092 Address: 18596 Arbolado Way that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. ,j enise Kaspar` Advanced Listing Services City of Saratoga Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 408 - 868 -1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Saratoga's Planning Commission announces a public hearing on the item described below on: Wednesday, the 140i day of March 2007, at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held at the Civic Theater at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Details are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. The public hearing item is: APPLICATION /ADDRESS: #07- 225 -18596 Arbolado Way APPLICANT/OWNER: Narain/Rockwood Design (Owners & Applicants) APNs: 397 -06 -092 Description: The applicant requests a Modification to a Design Review Approval granted by the Planning Commission on March 22, 2006, which consisted of demolition of approximately 38% of the existing exterior walls of a single -story single- family residence, and constructing a second - story addition, a small detached accessory pool structure, and modify the existing architectural style from a Modern Ranch home to an International design. The Modification would allow for . full demolition of the residence. No changes are proposed to the architectural design or building materials. The maximum height of the proposed residence will be not higher than 24 -feet. The net lot size is 40,205 square -feet and the site is zoned R -1- 40,000. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a Public Hearing in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing. In order for information to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed on or before Tuesday, March 6, 2007. This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor's office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out -of —date information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all residents potentially affected by a project. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Therese M. Schmidt, AICP Associate Planner 408 - 868 -1230 February 20, 2007 )wnership Listing Prepared for: 397 -06 -092 AJAY & KAAJAL NARAIN 18596 ARBOLADO WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -6205 397 -04 -013 397 -04- 014,119 397 -04 -015 BERNARD FELIX STEPHEN J LUCZO HARPREET & PAYAL CHADHA OR CURRENT OWNER PO BOX 66360 OR CURRENT OWNER 14908 SOBEY RD SCOTTS VALLEY CA 95067 -0360 14900 SOBEY RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6236 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6236 397 -04 -089 397 -04 -061 397 -04 -082 RICHARD L & COLLEEN POULIOT JAMES R & LOLA JOHNSON JAVAD & MITTA ASHJAY OR CURRENT OWNER 8861 COUNTRY HILL DR 14403 SOBEY RD 14976 SOBEY RD ELK GROVE CA 95624 -9462 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5607 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6236 397 -04 -090 397 -04 -094 397 -04 -118 ANDREA SKOV SUBHASH & UMA CHOWDARY ROBERT G & SUSAN BORTFELD OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 14970 SOBEY RD 14964 SOBEY RD 14820 SOBEY RD TOGA CA 95070 -6236 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6236 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6286 39-04-120 397 -04 -121 397 -04 -124 JAMES L & BRIGIT WHIMS STEPHEN LUCZO ANAFLOR SMITH OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 14800 SOBEY RD 14810 SOBEY RD 14910 SOBEY RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6286 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6286 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6236 397 -04 -125 397 -06 -059 397 -06 -070 JAMES & BETTINA JEAN ELWIN M & LOIS STOCKING RONALD D & ROSALIE GIVENS OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 14906 SOBEY RD 18674 WOODBANK WAY 18641 WOODBANK WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -6236 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6252 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6232 397 -06 -089 397 -06 -090 397 -06 -091 JUAN S & JULIA MELCHOR WILLIAM P & DORIS WISSICK W & VIVIANE ROTH OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18541 RANCHO LAS CIMASWAY 18561 ARBOLADO WAY 18593 ARBOLADO WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -6257 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6205 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6205 397 -06 -092 397 -06 -093 397 -06 -094 AJAY & KAAJAL NARAIN ROBERT J & DIANE GROSSO SANFORD Z & BARBARA FOX OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18596 ARBOLADO WAY 18564 ARBOLADO WAY 18585 RANCHO LAS CIMASWAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -6205 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6205 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6256 * 6-095 ARD & FRANCE PAPAPIETRO 397 -06 -096 DENNIS MCFARLANE 397 -06 -097 JOAN D HACKWORTH OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18601 RANCHO LAS CIMASWAY 18600 RANCHO LAS CIMASWAY 18586 RANCHO LAS CIMASWAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -6256 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6256 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6256 397 -06 -098 SUSAN B & R MCCABE OR CURRENT OWNER 18564 RANCHO LAS CIMASWAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -6256 397 -06 -101 MARK R & LINDA TICE OR CURRENT OWNER 18501 AQUINO WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -6204 397 -06 -104 MICHAEL M & LUCILA YAVROM OR CURRENT OWNER 18530 RANCHO LAS CIMASWAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -6231 397 -07 -002 TING YEN OR CURRENT OWNER 15040 EL QUITO WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -6209 397 -06 -099 RICHARD A & NANCY NELSON OR CURRENT OWNER 1853 AQUINO WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 397 -06 -102 ANGELO & NORMA GALLO OR CURRENT OWNER 18523 AQUINO WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -6204 397 -06 -105 CAD RESOURCES PO BOX 235 GROVELAND CA 95321 -0235 CITY OF SARATOGA ATTN: THERESE SCHMIDT 13777 FRUITVALE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 397 -06 -100 GREGORY T & RACHAEL CRUZ OR CURRENT OWNER 18500 AQUINO WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -6204 397 -06 -103 RONALD JOELSON OR CURRENT OWNER 18542 RANCHO LAS CIMASWAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -6231 397 -07 -001 ELIZABETH PESCHKE OR CURRENT OWNER 15020 EL QUITO WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -6209 t L • Attachment 3 C • 0 Max to D rayy i',ln, s Assessors Parcel #: 397 -06 -092 LG1Tit Pane C1 Existing Topography C2 Site Plan C3 Grading & Drainage Title Sheet C4 Grading & Drainage Plan C5 Grading Specifications & Details L1 Existing Landscape Plan Project Address: 18596 Arboledo Way, Saratoga, CA. Owners: Ajay and Kaajal Narain Existing Use: Single Family Residence Zoning District: R -1 40,000 Lot Size: 40,205 Square Feet Allowable Floor Area Per 15- 45.030: Slope is 7.18% No slope adjustment required. • Allowable Floor Area as Follows: Lot Size: 40,205 square.feet: 6,020 square feet allowable. 7 L2 Proposed Landscape Plan 1A0 De mol�itionPlan L w \ � Al First Floor A2 Second Floor A3 Roof Plan A4 Elevations ,A5 Sections Size of Structures: First Floor (Existing): 2,760 square feet Garage (Existing): 828 square feet Second Floor (Existing) : None First Floor (Proposed) 3,568 square feet Garage (Proposed) : 773 square feet Second floor (Proposed): 1,556 square feet Total Proposed Residence: 5,897 square feet Accessory Structure: 100 square feet Impervious Coverage: (For reference, refer to Sheet L2)- Hardscape (includes pool): 6,547 square feet First Floor: 4,341 square feet Accessory Structure: 100 square feet Total Coverage: 10,988 square feet (27% of site) Allowable Coverage per. 15-12.086 is 35% (14,071 square feet) Slope at Building Site: Nearly Flat Average Site Slope: 7.18% Age of Residence: Approx. 40 years 0 ti 0 m U d v � C L a1 co rn r_ ME Front (cul -de -sac): 30' -2" (e) I' Side Yard North): 23' -10" - 58' -9" o 89' -8" Side Yard East): 35 -11 " �e) 71' -11 " Rear: 101' -4" Lowest Elevation Point at Building Edge: 100.15' a Highest Elevation Point at Building Edge: 102.16.' Average Elevation Point: 101.1 Top Most Elevation Point .of StIture: 100% Of all exterior walls to be 126.72' I demolished "' o0 Refer to sheet AO J Setbacks as Follows- Distances are taken from closest point on elevation to Property L ne- See Sheet C2 for Reference; First Floor Second Floor Front (cul -de -sac): 30' -2" (e) 54' -4" Side Yard North): 23' -10" - 58' -9" Side Yard South): 46' -5" e) 89' -8" Side Yard East): 35 -11 " �e) 71' -11 " Rear: 101' -4" 107' -0" 14554 Big Basin Way Saratoga Ca 95070 408/741 -0189 Fx: 408/741 -5085 Dam, ,2 -21 -200 Dram By- lo'ma Perez 02- 16.2006 01 -17 -20076 1 �z1 T A ` _ m s o � THIS DRAWING REPRESENTS A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PREPARED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAND SURVEYORS ACT. THE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN HEREON ARE • COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA AND REPRESENT THE BEST -'-"• - _ 'H' A GRAPHICAL FIT BETWEEN RECORD INFORMATION AND THE TOPO- GRAPHICAL FEATURES SURVEYED AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON OR USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSES. PURSUANT TO THE -- ---- "- - - -- _ CUENTS DIRECTION A BOUNDARY SURVEY WAS NOT PERFORMED -- _— AT THIS TIME WHICH MAY HAVE DETERMINED THE ACTUAL PROPERTY LINES. - - -` -- -- - b' p' ,1 GRAPHIC SCALE T3_7;.= cac RO2ID cuRe k OF WTTER : ( DT FM � i� oe WAY bL-1D 00' RBOLAD � QQ ¢ o < c S 895�'5 E —fir— pt- rRCw rE��yf r O SITE B CH MARK TOP 0 PIPE IN M0N BOX t .R+ O �0Elll 100.00 UP CF W}7ER / 9� ® ASSU ED DATUM 0 �^ °'' CdYG ROUED CURB /y e" S 895035" E25.00 ' o m 0 AC _ p. _� ya 1 ycb m c ��� �o EDGE � c 01 Ac � i, SAG J _ _— \ �y colic ADEWAUK GB " 40 /r__ —_— ' h �! �1 1i \� bb '// 'n R°4 ?. DD `Op`•'9 i'^ i O ./� espy. • � I I� t % 9n TM1 KNENT ry0i � �.0+ 1 i -�j Z qi I v0 0 O I 3 q O EX/S;' REST b LOT 13 DENCE ^ °' $� o b' o R CT T A 5384 QO /!' I * upa12- 1-06 a 1! - o I � � � I �, ,�-•�, (, A9 - I 3 + � r8 Dp clW4p4 w 3 I 41 - 60' 0 0�' ILI it \\ h h .,p ALLEAIDAI£ AV r j z co � _qy 3 09 Tq. Ox' �? SITE 0 SHEET cl ® ba K M1 6' CNNN LINK FZKNf 0 RD A - c ? N 895035" W ^ —+ _ _ X2355' 3� . _ . 99y OF • - qh' 6' WOCO FENI,'E 90 I VICINITY MAP DA- 9/27/05 N.T.S. roe NO. 05254 • • Project Description: Remodel of existing 3,588 square foot one story single family residence. 753 square feet addition to first floor and new 1,556 square foot second floor. New 100 square foot accessory sturcture (pool cabana) and pool. All trees and landscaping to remain with the exception of two (2) NON - NATIVE birch trees in the front Yard. 1 1 Site Plan o � i i i i i/ i r r r r 1 i 1 � 1 � 1 � 1 1 i 1 1 ; 1 1 ; 1 1 1 I n! 7 i 1 B r 1, r r ; r � r 9 6 n inspection by the City, shalt provide a written all building setbacks are plans. 5 N O 1. -I0. -0„ Notes aExisting House Second Floor O ti O ci'>t 1Q U 0 U c L a� ca � N 1n 0) O.' C ttS L R cc Z O .O cc O L Q 00 r Rockwood Design 14554 Big Basin Way Saratoga Ca 95070 408/741 -0189 Fx: 408/741 -5085 Date: 12-21 -2005 Drawn By: Loren Perez C2 I gal F. A Oil IN FA 11 111 . I P fit I *.fix JAI gc } x 1sq A _ x�ii , La �r �2{ d !,or) o F ' �I -t--.tl , a� oil c all x�ii , La �r �2{ d !,or) o F ' �I -t--.tl i c all cl 4z F Will z z 0 1-3 c3 wJill! m N� = x P# 6 z � g ~ R ' 1 WZ W amD 0 > DWZ � � 0 0 0 3 * 2 > > . I m a<m ��_x 9 CdrJ I o fit $ NARAIN RESIDENCE LEA dl i , ING q m m 4 A. �y P�RE:LLIMINAI�Y:.,...:.:.,., 18596= ..AR:BORLADO.:� 1!YAY, 'CIVIL ENGINEERS: - IAND +SURVE'YOTdS: ,. tl . TITLE .SHEET 2495 INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY WEST _ SARATOGA , CALIFORNIA HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA 94545 a S (510) 887 -4088 g I I i I 1 SANTA CLARA COUNTY APN: 397 -06 -092. FAWAPASU887-3 19 COWIRACIOR SMALL 007AN THE PROPER PERA07S PRIOR ro ANY GRADI NR CONNECT ROOF OOWSPOUTS ro B' PVC TORTLRNE AT 1X KIN SLOPE UNLESS 07NERNISE APPROMM ALL CONS7RUVION AC77VIRES MUST BE PROVIDE C EAN0U74 AT AOL 50 PT. SPACIN; AT MAJOR dINC7101 A AND AT CONDUCTED OUTSIDE 7T# Df.5IGNA7ED FENCED AREAS (EVEN AFTER MCNG A SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY O ALL W7RK WDON IW CITY ALiDM7E ANGLE PONTS AVOID USNO 80' R71NGS AND USE PLUMING Is REMOVED). new ACMVES INCADE BUT ARE NOT NECESSARILY GAITED RGHT -OF' WAY. THE CONTRACTOR(S) SHAM OBTAIN AN APPROVED STREET Or 717E 7NE FOLLOWING: DEWO11710K SWAGE SCRAPING, GRADING 7RENC ING MOW (pOCROACYIENT PERWI) PERMIT FROM THE PU&tC WOWS < 45' ELLS AT BUM SCREENING SHALL- BE INSTALLED N W WTIFRS TO EQARPOENIT'CLEAf STOCIfPIMG AND WAOPNG MATEXALS (NCL DING SOIL DEPARTIVIT PRIOR TO TEE CONNENfiOENT OF DO MORN W7HN TINE 07Y PRENWAALURE FX4 AMI) W bWEENT WINCE OPERATION AND PARIM NGNT -CF TINY 9NS7ALL 4' PVC "(SDR 33 OR BETTER) O TX 11IN.. PEIOIE7ER SUBORAN 1RENCOl6:FOR LWDFRGROIAD U1817ES AND SERVICES' . AS W3L AS CLW7RACM 96MA PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN APPROVED EROSION AND SYSTEM, AND CONNECT 7O CM-CA RWRAN 7N nDE ro OUIFALL AT... PLUMING LEES FOR THE POOL Y11ST BE DESIGNED AND ESTABLLSIE'D SEEBENTAIM CONTROL Y£ASURES DURING RANY SEASON PER TOWN MD DAVtM -TVP. al79DE FRW BEi W THE 7REIM CANOPIES FOR DE PLLWONG LIES A.BAG SIADARDS - REFER ro EROSION AND SEVAdENIA770N CONDRM DEY WILL NEE TO BE ROUTED ALONG 7NE NEST E OF THE HOME FLAN. FOONL AWN AND RErAmw WALL suElDRAi1S SHALL BE 4' PVC O IX AGN, AND SHALL REMAIN AS A SEPARA7E SYSTEM OEDNCATED FOR SUBSURFACE - 7HE REMOVAL OF DE EMS W SHED AND CONCRETE RAMP SHOULD RE ALL OWED SLOPES SMALL BE PLM W -WTH FAST GiROMNG DEEP ROOTED DRAINAGE ONLY CONVECT TO B' PVC 77 M AWS O IN UK SLOPE 70 GROIID COVER TO REDUCE 7HE'EROSION DURING WAVY RAMS CU7FALL, YAMUALLY PERFORIED (LE WiNHOVT DE USE LF TRACTORS OR ODER - - FEAVY E77LuP;ENT) PTIOIt ro PRO7ECDVE FEWC7INC (R]ING RSTALI.RSNED DR SLOPE FIISiED GRADES A WMW OF 4E FOR AT LEAST AE FIVE FEET (3? D V*W POEM AS SNDIIN WDOIN 7RMFIC AREAS AND SU&EM:T TO AFTER F EV WF LS PERT XAV ING REMOVAL THE PROCESS SST 8E OOS'E7eS PERFOROffD W7NOUT EXGYA7INB SOP. WRING RE PROCE'Si FROM. BLI.DLMO FERIYE7FR DIECT SURFACE DRAINAGE RLMLKF ro WIMIN R W MONN SMALL <E AREAS iY L BE dt EQUAL. OV- OR AS ON -SITE - 3/OWN 07M NON- TRAFRC ARFA5 SifAU. B6 Yi/RI5T1' Y-24- qP EQUAL SLOPE GARAGE SLAB O IS AOL (1/B' PER FT.) ro PROVIDE POSDYE uNIE'ss D7HER NNO7IDI. DRAINAGE AREA DRAMS SNALL BE CHRISTY Y-l' OR APPROVED EQUAL PROMOS 1 SLOPE ACROSS FLATW W ANDAN PAVID AND SLOPE 70 DAWN PROWDE DONOR DRAM IIEi(S) W7W L.00AL&W LANDSCAPE AREAS AS / REFER ro ARCITECTS PLANS FOR PAVEMENT TYPE LAYWT, AND FlNBSI _� - RE7>tldZfDL AND aL7FAU AT Dm7GY OLSSPA7HL L/5E AOI. Lr PVC AT fz AON. oC� SLOPE REFER 70 RANWATER DOWOWT 7K TUNE REMMA NIS FOR CO NSIRUCT FAR7NE7N SHALES AT TX TM (IX YIN.)) a BOW As REQUIRED CLEANO� AND RTMOGS As :SAM AR. TO DIRECT FLOW TO WWIE SAFE FINISHED GRACES M DAMM ro ROW? 70 AROVIECRWAL PLANS FOR ADDNDONAL ACCgONODATE POWIVE DRAINAGE AND AVOID PONDNG FOR RDWMES . GREATER MAN S; PROVIDE LINED 0/1CIN. -TYP. ti& S sqi Q- 5' E —fix 517E c. S - ►+ RANCHO N. VICINITY MAPyO SIC 1 2 = a W GOnO` CONG ROLUD LURE �x OF Ox QRTFR S q G X �.RBOLADO�,£ - WAY 9,9; / ITE B NPE IN MON Box �t � 8 ELFIN 100 -00 4 ASSU ED DATUM d _ �9 rrwr a(Tem h�RR tp O I/ �- leS WAya v I EE p3 Q a O ^ 00 s 1X e e Oy GF m �� l,p� cDNc wEWALY1 00' X / ' I / TREE I4 WALNCWAY �? ,� (FJCT3 X31 r❑i 0 WATER TREE 7O SINCE �u��goh�� 9M1 / 0 / TREE y 'Co eF iS RENO eh +a9 �3> 70WAND C°� F-� LUJ rLi own (N) AY . ar Fa wtaiely n9 < • ,. 1 { , t e °�M1 M1 nM1M1 .' M10'9g d P.A. YV- s Ma. 4 PVC O 9� -TREE NG � cn zs +9w i 30 FT LONG dS9PATOIR cf5 ti` M10 ° `0 / (N) 7YARD +M) aDISSPATOR �: 7 I M7FIk7NW r 24' PEAFORA7FD '3PA. .. ...'.'... -.. (N% _..c ,{ ' iRFNON ' PERFORATED a'. x o,°' �� I fNOPE SEE LAETAq, O.t �..�`� °OZ 1h �� 4 �? 2PE PA Ir DETAIL I J 0411, ES m - i 2` TREE MT (N) WALKWAY }go - Fr. fox T /Pl... .. 9 a B' RAINWATER . \ "� �o.. - ... _ ... . ". "..(N).B' 7ERa /CJ NCF ....- ":p7 l h v �1 9' (NJ DOWN STOUT \ oM1 - CANOPY .TREE jj8 7TGHXw O OSS;011 LINE / / �,J► h U I} M1 / CB slbw Moo � SID ------ � � A PA 1 +s .. Y VAN RAlNWA7ER/ x t 1 (N) B' PVC SD M1" :. tM10 oM1. Pte° -- \s ....1 / T ! BETTER O IX ° ?� ti0 .. .. A O OSX Mgt✓ � � / � w � � TREE /(9 FT 6 SID — 1 x , 0 10200 d (W) PA770 961x0 TREE '�,< n 10200 n� - e �) / .9g0h x99961 - / REVISIONS BY ' e A//// < CANOIPY SCE. 4 TGZB w Oo,M1O.,h`��xy`�M1 . /E2� JOB NO. 2060100 f I \ TECT ... - d ... , oc' 9S 'lr /yc'� DATE 2 -LV-O6 �1 \ 9 o,ro RtMn00 i .. 9 �� /y�? SCALE As NOTED 01 - ❑snNC / u 0 5 10 20 } All DESIGN 0Y: WC 'lr (N)_.EOUPAkNT �,.�� / 2 / DRAM Br: ttu • 96at ROONC h W / ?r ya +990 / / r .S('rR�.ET SHIRT NO..: A�6 6PV1' 5 IHVN LNK f N 8035 W MO 4S - OF 3 SHEETS _ — I I IN � w 0 1 its. r, ��� R $ Ell 9 All ki it AIM if I Ill I A $ R $ Is 2 A 01MA ii ip $ $ $ > till, l $ : a i�oA u m � $ R $ IOU I , t $ a lit R $ $ $ � a R R • ! F N IN��M $t Jill o �R $R gill 1IR '$ INS �Y mp pg 2 s R �� -rd $ R � � I �� 11,111 �� � s 6pl I 1 All � � R$ a m 6 H ills, A 12 j!ij $ :� $$ fR R R 4941 Ila R mPRI It R ea7 R� all, PH till 414, m qsqs 2 � ;11144111A j$ �Z ��� gag It A No ! I IN I $ i ¢ R+ fl�x I � sk Nil AR 0 r. A m. 1 F4 1 N 111 IN 1 11 14t 45 l �Rf A 11 gill t 0 114mg - > �� liWaRx �� z $ R $ RIB Ill all m4ii,111; 11 pill Il- m R �81 L > M A+ P P A Ill 49 Ila g IR A 9 0 X� $ Q, $ 29 1P milli Al ,'AA R1 $ : i ,Ifs$ I 111lix l 11 :0 all �$ �_ AID $$ 1$1 41111111gim lit a till l t" �� � $�� �I RM ��RRR N p 2 r ?t I. ;c 1t p .4 In p n al kill > till $ H i IRS - $ z $ R � ill 1 �11 A Hal It A{a 2 111 R ly R F 111 T{ I'll m 1111 lilt, ¢$� A $� / / ��INK, �1 111 R i7i -1 At AIR AMR III am NARAIN RESIDENCE L 3 Sly BOGEVA SIC. J o m 4 PRELIMINARY GRADING — ® CIVFL ENGINEERS • LAND 3URVEYORB . $ SPECIFICATIONS 18596 ARBORLADO WAY, INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY WEST $ SARATOGA CALIFORNIA HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA 99345 s & DETAILS g I I I I I (3,0,.887 -408 SANTA CLARA COUNTY APN: 397 -08 -092 FAX 19 WX � 0 Notes i' r—, ! o 1 ® ® / of O U) Existing Landscape � ' � °divMi � ! L ,j ,.. ;� (7) _ 11 ® -0' Min. From C Of Rtsdnw A -New we ® 1 /� i I81"Erdry®r—', It 8 - Vr am�Patlo oG � I 1: 1 k" > '* !• ' ; .n s s m� Yr .I EO J h - -- vw •'t -: cry 4j I -x d ]. tir t �,s. tr n 3y Y� ,a _ _ • { 9 cc jZ £ �I '; : r / 3 I H .•d _ ;- :•._:' i I o -- ------- ._ ..., \ 0 / BeticYwd Pelb 1 1 is r' y •t —,� —__ -- I � r-t-.I Pd Pr 1 (C y � i \ ''xR p 'l 4 , �Y 113 11 elm IN 0119 J• 12 Landscape y Existing A- New live Oak _ Ir erviaus Coverage: 6/ Z Hm,Outakfe From The Canopies of Retailed T _ - __ - -- -------- 14 ; ,_; ;%/ ® - - _" '1 13 '��� Garden Structure 810 SgFt ( f ---___ - - - — __ - - ---- " - = New Trees: Trees to be Removed: C Pool 1,556 SgFt Pool Patio 372 SgFt Backyard Patio 1,443 SgFt Ln '- I -------------- - -- ® - (2)A - Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia) #15 European White 24 -Inch Box Size Birch 8" Birch 12" E F Side Patio 112 SgFt Court Yard 478 SgFt _ �- -- Must be installed prior to final inspection, Planters: Entry Path 90 SgFt be double- staked with rubber tree ties, Driveway 1,686 SgFt and be supplied with water in the form of Maori Chief (Phormium tenax) Rosmary Blue Boy (Rosmarinus Total: 6,547 SgFt Rockwood Design a drip -type system connected to the offcinalis) _ 14554 Big Basin Way automatic irrigation system. Saratoga Ca 95070 408/741 -0189 Fx 408/741 -5085 Note: All Front Yard Landscaping Shall Be Installed Prior To Fin all Inspection - ,z- , -zoos 4 prawn By. Lorem Porer j Landscape Plan j 1 "`10' -0" LZ • Notes _ -_; Wall To Be Demolished O ti O Ln rn ro U to O O N � ��./�/��V \ /��V \�-V\.�'�/V -'.; ��/- `✓- V -�,/-� �� /��'�i-�..�- �/ \�-�.,�� ��.r- � %�,�/�.•�V V- 1/- '�✓�. ^� /VV'�/V�/-�,�1.��- �'-�•� ,� \� �� � ca J\ ) (D M aD to (> --- -- ------ ---- -- :- /--- -- _==-- -3' ................ _ . - � -- \ _ cc cc „ , - - - - - -_ __- ______ 1 - Q —----- LO Co r . ----------------------------------- Rockwood Design �� 14554 819 Basin Way • Sars"a Ca 95070 L___- ___---- _- -- _____ -- --___----- _------ --- --= : 408/741 -0189 .` -------------__.---------- ----- -- -- -- -------- ----- ----- -' < Fx 408/741 -5085 Date: 01 -17 -2007 Drawn By. Lorene Venz Demolition Plan NT_ 3/16 ^ =r -0^ AO V-W WON mmFF. Note: An approved fire sprinkler system ahaa be Total "oor Areas: 5,997 SgFt rov pided thmghout all portions of the budding, Including Accessory Structure designed per National Fire Protection Association A 643 SgFt (NFPA) Standars #131) and local orcinaneea. The fire B 143 SgFt sprinkler vA" vaiving shag be hwulled per fire w department standard details and specifications C 343 Sgft D 72 SgFt Note:An Early Warning fire alarm system shall be E 250 SgFt provided tivvighout all potions of the sbucoae, 0 Instaned per City of Saratoga standards. Prior to F 610 SgFt installation, a dcersed a -10 subcontractor shag submit G 213 SgFt to the fine department, Plans, specifications and Ratings, fJ cc, a completed permit application, and application fees k 197 SgFt for review and approval. 1 457 SgFt J 722 SgFt K 81 SgFt L 610 SgFt -I M 100 SgFt Accessory Structure _ ___— Total: 4,441 SgFt V-W WON mmFF. W I O t uy a i w V m O -t•PY�R.6,nrp,am�TPlenti� 0 I. fJ cc, C L � -I t� _ ___— ________ F C t6 ' L � cc Z o -v N i Q rn 1n CO Rockwood Design —7 -- 14554 Big Basin Way ne Saratoga Ca 95070 408/741 -0189 i Fic 408/741 -5085 i Date: 12 -21 -2005 1 Drawn By. Lorene Perez ZL 02- 16.2006 i h Kim 1=1 el Notes O O uy O� w V m O .mm 0 4-, fJ cc, C L t� C t6 ' L � cc Z o -v N 0 Q rn 1n CO Rockwood Design 14554 Big Basin Way Saratoga Ca 95070 408/741 -0189 Fic 408/741 -5085 Date: 12 -21 -2005 Drawn By. Lorene Perez ZL 02- 16.2006 Al 0 0 Notes B I 0 »� 0 GB - ----- - -- T tar Floor Areas: 5,997 syFt Including Accessory Structure Q) A 821 SgFt B 20 SgFt 2e-11(r 2W , ,r r -6• C 55 Sqft D 97 SgFt U i a E 214 SgFt 3 F 66 SgFt 6 G 283 SgFt At0 AM I T tal: 1,556 Sgft a• O i v ca a - - - - �.. - -- - - -- -- - - ------------- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -o C d4r (a NI6Yb ; ,.r __ -. -_- OE r .. r- eau N -- -= I Te a�i r\ C LL i _ e: M approved fire sprinlder system slreU be Z b _ ;___�l _ - 1d —_ _ — prpvided `'. throughout all porticrts of the building, 1�. ned per Natlorlal Fire R•otection Assodatlon ' - --- - _ _ _ _ _ i O (N ,PA) Standaa #13D and local orcUrrances. The fire splinkkr supply vaWing ahaU be IroteUed Per fire �C 1 1 ��•p • _ department standard detaft and sPedflcatbne cc --- ----- -I 1 - +- - -- + -- ! � _ - -. - e. _ -- Note:An Early WaMng fire alarm system.shaU be _ rew,x- ra.n. i------ m -L_._..•.e...,.","r'.....J ..... .......... .aer� -Il-- -- - - -� ,e � _- - �' � d Saratoga standards. Prior to O D..... *�.. I ♦` in�taRation, a licensed C -10 subcontractor stall submit tol fire department, pans, speditations and listings, L a I '� I a r orn*ted permit aWkation, and ap; lk atlon fees ( a Af0 Af0 AW I •fa review and approval. Q I A1D I b A1D I aWJ tt^^ W ' I r e I r I ,s' -z < I ,4 , t+n I I I I I I I i i i I I 00 I t I I I I I Rockwood Design 9 14554 Big Basin Way Saratoga Ca 95070 408/741 -0189 r Fx:408/741 -5085 Date: 12.21 -2005 Drawn By Lorene Perez pD2,62A2 Second Floor N O an s "_1 � -o° 1 0 01 Notes C) I LA I N 10 11 vi I I ; I i i U Root Dad Y ( I N I I 1 j ■ Dt Q - I 6 fOt )OC 1 4. _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — . — _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ — - J_ T __- ___________._.______ —_— I ________ I I I _ _ _ __— — _ — _ _ _ —_ _ _— _______ wYtY asps WHr n. �I N :1 N i 4 it I _ — _ __ _ _ _ — . _ - _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ I _ - — ______ _ _______ I — ___— _— Y .— I L it I • I Soler Panty War ;b aMei M2.3for LeYala q+Knr - � 1 ;I Q 1- 1 \, . _— _ --- _______.____ —_ ` — — ____ __ __ _ _ _ _ 7 Z -____ ___ __ _�._____— _— _t____— I___.__._.__. ___._._ _ i i t6 1 I i i ( I j s. eMMMp I i I i I Y ILI I I I I I I I I I I I I l Ln I I I I I I I I I I ! I i I I I I IQ _p. w7rr _ Y i i Co 1 Rockwood Design - 14554 Big Basin Way Saratoga G 95070 408/741 -0189 F)c 408/741 -SOBS - Date: 12 -21 -2005 Dram By: Lorene Pau �01 - Roof Plan i N 3/16 ^ =r op -17 -2007 t1 A 3 • • d Notes Natural Grade i + — — +— ❑ Stucco Body Color -`- --------------- - - - - -- — -..° Old Salem Gray Y �`�""-------- �- — Benjamin Moore ----- -- -- - - -- — - .. — — — _ — Stucco Accent Color Whitall Brown — — — — I _ ! e en j m Moore Benjamin - - - -- - - -- - --- ----------- „ - -- -- _ -- ! i i -- - — _ _ - ° �' 0 Window s Aluminum Color Tawny Rose , •i I -.- -_ _ I _ - � ' Benjamin Moore � , ; I i i I U 1 North Front Elevation i 0 I! - - - - - -- --- ------- LF —� ° V N OA i _.____ IJ C L oo a — ;! r I L_ y _ e I I 2 East Left Elevation re I I h I rTi II' ��I� ; ; -- - O , - i � z= Ct Q 3 South Rear Elevation to - CID I I I I �- r- I 4V' l I lliill . iI I • zd f s —� a -- -- i I O - Rockwood Design r jI it i ! I s it ' I r I, J '".�" -i F �j !I 14554 Big Basin Way Saratoga Ca 95070 408/741 -0189 I;I �I Pc 408/747 -5085 P ii—, a - -r- -- - - - - - - - -- pate, 12 -21 -2005 Drawn Sr Lorene Verex West Right Elevation "$� °' °" 01 -17 -2007 A4 d `✓ Y 6.N An - r i s« I it it � Iii'' ,�.�:•- � � ,,� /,� I I il�i I 1 II I 41•. -- - — room - f – I ' _ -- - - -+ - 1 j 1 Cross Section i (q �J i C i I eea,00rei I `I C I I i I I SSj$ j 1 • a 2 Long Section i I ;r ! } n0� i I° j r- 1r i E Notes I cc tv z � O N i o LO .c Q co CO r m y Bedman t F• F S S � s .� Rockwood Design 1I 14554 Big Basin way _ Saratoga Ca 95070 408/741 -0189 — Fx: 408/741 -5085 D7; 72 -2 -2005 Drawn By. Lorene Perez rrITT o S I � Ln. � I cc I I V _ CO O { i d � 'D N N i 3 N I — � I cc tv z � O N i o LO .c Q co CO r m y Bedman t F• F S S � s .� Rockwood Design 1I 14554 Big Basin way _ Saratoga Ca 95070 408/741 -0189 — Fx: 408/741 -5085 D7; 72 -2 -2005 Drawn By. Lorene Perez rrITT C� • 0 Item 3 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No./Location: Type of Application: Owner /Applicant: Staff Planner: Meeting Date: APN: 06 -213; 18935 Hayfield Court Design Review Pichetti /Cahoon Shweta Bhatt, Assistant Planner March 14, 2007 397 -24 -105 Department Head:) F. Livingstone, AICP CNdO +G'M KA6 `� Subject: o, re ).9 18935 Hayfield Court Ss s_s '? ` _ APN: 397 -24105 15 = t +XSD)LE 37 9 -• T 79 •^ - X14. J89 / ^/. PCT-} °•,; "''s :,' .' ,5,. `y 10."}G �%• c %� •s:.�)C�!`C/ S.C61C. N: oy� ` v { � 6 �<a `W�,`" !• � " y�y��q, _ `/ ;esl r�.cC•. 1 10 4 11 )*'• ��� > : �.} '" / 4' I i u•'I'. n >v' y.,' «81 S ,.� }� Y S HET`. ,.%I .�`� .' T.T7 1+ •: AC. G9• air v. ,e v, %�+e . / / ' 'r ' 1.17 /:'a '. /.•'� � • ` ° 4 eic�•• f ` e ° hC0 s s, s XSL t _ ,, wy ^� , -., , _!__,_� :yam _ •s . ��.:, s % � . `` .. j 18935 Hayfield Court Application No. 06 -213; 18935 Hayfield Court EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 0 CASE HISTORY: Application filed: 12/22/05 Application complete: 02/16/07 Notice published: 03/07/07 Mailing completed: 02/24/07 Posting completed: 03/08/07 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct a new two -story single - family dwelling. The dwelling will consist of approximately 6,189 square feet of floor area and a basement. The height of the structure will not exceed the 26 -foot height limitation. The gross lot size is approximately 62,726 square feet and the site is located in the R -1- 20,000 zoning district. Design Review approval by the Planning Commission is required pursuant to Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.060. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve this design review application by adopting the attached resolution with conditions. Staff is not recommending any permanent conditions of approval for this project. Application No. 06 -213; 18935 Hayfield Court 0 STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R- 1- 20,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: LDR (Low Density Residential) MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE: Approximately 62,726 gross square feet and approximately 60,086 net square feet SLOPE: Approximately 13.79% GRADING REQUIRED: There will be minimal grading required for this project. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed new single - family residence is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single - family residences. MATERIALS AND COLORS: The proposed colors and materials consist of deep beige stucco, tile roofing, wooden shutters, and windows in a deep brown color. A color and materials board will be available at the public hearing. • Application No. 06 -213; 18935 Hayfield Court PROJECT DATA Pro osed Re uired FZonin age 4,069 SF (6.8 %) Maximum Allowable = nce: Driveway and Motor Court: 2,570 SF (4.3 %) 27,039 SF (45 %) Other Impervious Areas: 15250 SF (2.08 %) TOTAL Site Coverage 7,889 SF (13.1 %) Floor Area First Floor Area: 3,259 SF Maximum Allowable = Second Floor Area: 1,950 SF 6,200 SF Double Counted Area: 165 SF Garage Area: 810 SF Basement Area (not FA): [15859 SF] TOTAL Floor Area 6,184 SF Setbacks Second First Floor- Floor Second First Floor Floor Front: 67 Feet 67 Feet 30 Feet 30 Feet Rear: 60 Feet 64 Feet 35 Feet 45 Feet Left Side: 30 Feet 55 Feet 15 Feet 20 Feet Right Side: 70 Feet 85 Feet 15 Feet 20 Feet Height Lowest Elevation Point: 473.66 Maximum Height = Highest Elevation Point: 479.31 502.48 (26 Feet) Average Elevation Point: 476.48 Proposed Topmost Point: 500.79 (24 Feet 4 Inches) PROJECT DISCUSSION Site Characteristics and Project Description The applicant is requesting design review approval to construct a new home with a basement. The subject site is located within a recently subdivided area, and is accessed from a private street (Hayfield Court). The property is surrounded by single - family residences on two sides, Hayfield Court to the front, a tributary of Wildcat is historically South of site, and Douglas Lane to the East. A large two-story significant is located adjacent to the subject property. Dense vegetation currently exists along the eastern side of the property. Project Design Characteristics The proposed home will have two stories and a basement. Characteristic architectural elements include wooden shutters, exposed rafters, tile roofing, and wrought iron balcony rails. Additionally, the stucco is proposed to be of a deep beige color and windows to be • Application No. 06 -213; 18935 Hayfield Court stained in a darker wood finish. The home will feature an outdoor loggia, which is where the one wood - burning fireplace will be located. All other fireplaces will be gas. Staff finds the design to be consistent across facades and sufficiently detailed with high quality materials. The varied rooflines and architectural elements such as rafters and shutters help to break up massing and bulk of the structure. Additionally, the structure has been designed to accommodate the topography of the site. Staff is able to make design review findings for the project, as the design is thorough and well articulated. Neighbor Review The applicant has informed neighbors of the project and notification letters have been attached to this staff report to reflect these efforts. One neighbor has requested that the applicant install a French drain along the common property line and the applicant has agreed to this request. A condition of approval requiring the grading and drainage plans to be revised has been added to the resolution. Staff has not received any further comments as of the preparation of this staff report. Trees The arborist has inventoried a total of sixteen (16) trees for this project. One of the larger trees on the property, identified as tree #1 in the arborist report, is a large Valley Oak and 40 is one of the more distinguished trees on the property. However, due to its poor health, the arborist recommends removal of this tree. It has no monetary value which needs to be mitigated for. A dawn redwood, identified as tree #2 in the report will need to be removed in order to accommodate the project. The arborist has approved removal of this tree, particularly given the number of other trees on the parcel that will be protected. The applicant proposes two Coast Redwoods and two Coast Live Oaks to mitigate for this tree's removal. The majority of the remaining trees on the parcel are located along the Eastern property line adjacent to Douglas Lane and will be protected through the construction phase with fencing. The property owner will be required to post a tree bond equal in value to the remaining trees ($72,470) prior to issuance of City permits. Geotechnical Clearance Geotechnical Clearance has been granted for this project as required for the proposed basement. General Plan Findings The proposed project is consistent with the following General Plan Policies: Conservation Element Policy 6.0 - Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. Proposed building materials are earth tone and will not create a significant visual impact to the rural atmosphere of Application No. 06 -213; 18935 Hayfield Court Saratoga. In addition, the proposal is well under the impervious coverage allowed for the parcel. and Use Element Policy 5.0 -The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the Findings required for Design Approval. The home is well designed with detailed architectural features. Design Review Findings The proposed project is consistent with all the following Design Review findings stated in City Code Section 15- 45.080: (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The project meets this finding in that the proposed house substantially exceeds the required setbacks. The site is surrounded on one side by a tributary. Alsbo, mane of by dense expansive windows are on the rear facade, will vegetation along the Eastern property line. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. Minimal grading and topographical changes are proposed in conjunction with this project. A majority of the trees on the property will be protected throughout the construction process with fencing. Additionally, native species of trees (Coast Redwoods and Coast Live Oaks) are proposed to mitigate for the removal of a dawn redwood. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. The project meets this finding in that all Arborist report recommendations have been made conditions of approval of the project to ensure a high degree of survival for all trees retained on site. These trees will be protected during the construction process with tree fencing and the applicant will be required to post a tree bond prior to issuance of City permits. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the project is below maximum The desggn is consistent for the zoning designation which the parcel is located. each facade and incorporates various architectural detailing such as shutters, rafters, and wrought iron railing. Additionally, the home has been designed to follow the topography of the site in order to minimize excessive bulk. (e) Compatible bulk and height. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the structure is well - designed and is overall compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The proposal sits away from an adjacent one -story home and there exists a large two -story adjacent the to subject parcel. The home is comparable to other homes in the neighborhood that are newly constructed in regards to overall style and appearance. 0 Application No. 06 -213; 18935 Hayfield Court (f) Current grading and erosion control methods. The proposal would conform to the City's current grading and erosion control methods. The applicant is required to maintain stormwater on site where feasible and therefore this finding may be made in the affirmative. (g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above. This finding may be made in the affirmative. Conclusion Staff finds that the Design Review findings can be made in the affirmative. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve design review application 06- 213 with conditions by adopting the attached resolution. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution of Approval for Design Review. 2. Arborist Report, dated January 13, 2006. 3. Affidavit of mailing notices, public hearing notice, and copy of mailing labels for project notification. 4. Neighbor review letters. 5. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A." • Attachment 1 • • • APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 07-040 Application No. 06 -213 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA . Michael and Kristi Pichetti; 18935 Hayfield Court Approval of a new two -story home with basement WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review to construct a new two story 6,184 square foot home and 1,859 square foot basement. The new home will be less than 26 feet in height and will be situated on a 60,086 (net) square foot lot. The lot is situated in the R -1- 20,000 zoning district; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, the project, which proposes to construct a new single - family residence is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This Class 3 exemption applies to construction of a single family home in an urbanized area; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for design review approval, and the following findings specified in City Code Section 15- 45.080 and the City's Residential Design Handbook have been determined: NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The project meets this finding in that the proposed house substantially exceeds the required setbacks. The site is surrounded on one side by a tributary. Also, many of the more expansive windows are on the rear fagade, which will be screened by dense vegetation along the Eastern property line. b) Preserve Natural Landscape. Minimal grading and topographical changes are proposed in conjunction with this project. A majority of the trees on the property will be protected throughout the construction process with fencing. Additionally, native species of trees (Coast Redwoods and Coast Live Oaks) are proposed to mitigate for the removal of a dawn redwood. This finding may be made in the affirmative. Application No. 06 -213; 18935 Hayfield Court c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. The project meets this finding in that all Arborist report recommendations have been made conditions of approval of the project to ensure a high degree of survival for all trees retained on site. These trees will be protected during the construction process with tree fencing and the applicant will be required to post a tree bond prior to issuance of City permits. d) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. This finding can be . made in the affirmative in that the project is below the maximum height requirement for the zoning designation which the parcel is located. The design is consistent across each fagade and incorporates various architectural detailing such as shutters, rafters, and wrought iron railing. Additionally, the home has been designed to follow the topography of the site in order to minimize excessive bulk. e) Compatible bulk and height. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the structure is well - designed and is overall compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The proposal sits away from an adjacent one -story home and there exists a large two -story adjacent the to subject parcel. The home is comparable to other homes in the neighborhood that are newly constructed in regards to overall style and appearance. fl Current grading and erosion control methods. The proposal would conform to the City's current grading and erosion control methods. The applicant is required to maintain stormwater on site where feasible and therefore this finding may be made in the affirmative. g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above. This finding may be made in the affirmative. Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, application number 06 -213 for Design Review Approval is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: PERMANENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL There are no permanent conditions of approval for this project. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. The proposed home shall be constructed as shown on Exhibit "A" incorporated by reference. Application No. 06 -213; 18935 Hayfield Court 2. Four sets of complete construction plans incorporating this signed Resolution and . Arborist Report dated January 13, 2006 shall be included on the plans submitted to the Building Division for permit plan check review. 3. Final landscape, irrigation and utility plans shall be incorporated into the construction plan set and shall take into account the following requirements: Landscape plan shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff, promote surface infiltration and minimize use of fertilizers and pesticides that can contribute to water pollution. Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment, . Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. A note shall be included on the site plan stating that no construction equipment or private vehicles shall park or be stored within the dripline of any ordinance protected trees on the site. 4. Front yard landscaping shall be installed prior to final occupancy inspection. 5. Any changes to the approved plans must be submitted in writing with a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. No downgrading in the exterior appearance of the approved residence will be approved by staff. Downgrades may include but are not limited to garage doors, architectural detailing, stonework, columns, shutters, driveway materials, etc. Proposed changes to the approved plans are subject to the approval of the Community Development Director and may require review by the Planning Commission. 6. The site plan shall contain a note with the following language: "Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the LLS of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per the approved plans." Application No. 06 -213; 18935 Hayfield Court 7. A storm water retention plan indicating how all storm water will be retained on -site, and incorporating the New Development and Construction — Best Management Practices, shall be submitted along with the complete construction drawings. 8. Water and/or runoff from the project site shall not be directed toward the adjacent properties. 9. The grading and drainage plans shall be modified to reflect arborist and neighbor comment. 10. All processing fees, in the form of deposit accounts on file with the community development department, shall be he balanced less than $500, all 0sOtafsurplus ork on the at all times. In the event that t project shall cease until the balance is restored to a minimum of $500. CITY ARBORIST 11. All recommendations contained in the City Arborist Report dated January 13, 2006 shall be followed. 12. Tree protective measures, as specified by the City Arborist, shall be installed and inspected by Staff prior to issuance of City Permits. 13. Prior to issuance of City Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City, in a form acceptable to the Community Development Director, security 00% of the total appraised value of trees to be retained to guarantee the maintenance and preservation of trees. 14. The City Arborist shall inspect the site to verify compliance with tree protective measures. The bond shall be released after the planting of required replacement trees, a favorable site inspection by the City Arborist, and payment of any outstanding Arborist fees. GEOTECHNICAL CLEARANCE 15. The Project Geotechnical Engineer shall review and approve all geotechnical aspects of the final development plans (i.e., site preparation and grading, site drainage improvements and design parameters for building foundations, and driveways) to ensure that the plans, specifications and details accurately reflect the consultants' recommendations. Specifically, the Consultant shall consider the following: ■ For compliance with the Uniform Building Code, consideration shall be given to minimum 15 -inch wide foundation footings. ■ Consideration shall be given to utilization of minimum two #5 bars (top and bottom) in foundation footings. • Bob Marshall 408- 354 -4281 p•1 Notification Template for `A� �5 Neighbor p Development Applications Date: > ` / I C, r PROJECT ADDRESS: E' Aq All Applicant Name: i' I i �. Pt Application Number: The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing_ Staff and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. LJMy signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need. to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. []My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; l understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Neighbor Name: PkV (T> � rZox ^ww- _ T gc '""' "�' Neighbor Address: 8989 Pr/4-11 F, C-L o C cu,er City of Saratoga Neighbor Phone #: $ 7 2. " O g7 O Printed: Pq,►i7 C. ��TEftsc.Hri rar Planning Department Neigabor Notification Template for Development Applications Date: f , r PROJEC ADDRESS: �,� �j /7 S YI �' ► '� C - Applicant Name: P(C4.z-M, Application Number: �) The Saratoga Planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to- address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look. favorably upon neighbors who fail to voice their concerns and issues when solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Staff and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga. Rmy signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. []My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Neighbor Name: Neighbor Address: SNeighbor Phone #: Lid `" F6 Signature: �U Printed: City of Saratoga Planning Department f � Attachment 5 0 ew Family Home for: Mike & Kristi PICETTI 18935 Hayfield Court Saratoga, California 95070 1`INDEX'.° - (GENERAL TITLE & COVER SHEET INDEX, PROJECT DATA, &VICINITY MAP T I i CIVIL DRAWINGS GRADING& DRAINAGE, COVER 1 GRADING A DRAINAGE PLAN 2 1SITE SURVEY and TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 3 I 1 SITE PLAN °. (_�� JGNE 1GEX A.1 LB.1 NJ ✓. q�0a AS UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A3 ROOF PLAN AA PROFILE SECTIONS A.5 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.6 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.7 AREA CALCULATION S DIAGRAM AJI ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS SITE PLAN A.0 .i BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN A.1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN AS UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A3 ROOF PLAN AA PROFILE SECTIONS A.5 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.6 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.7 AREA CALCULATION S DIAGRAM AJI LANDSCAPING PLANS LANDSCAPING PLANTING Ll l !FIRE DEPT. NOTES AC'S. !PROJECT DATA 1. Property is not located in a designated hazardous f area IZ. Larly Warning Fire Alarm System shall be installed Iand maintained. The Alma Contractor shall submit thme (3) copies of—,king drawings In the fire distrirz for review and sppmval. The alarm system mart be installed by a licensed contractor. The fire district mus usa e a pemtit p i,, m the instaiLi ion ofthe EWAS system (City of Saratoga Code 16 -60). 3. Amomstic sprinklers shall " installed fm the new 8,640 sq.R. dwelling, including "' Garage, workshop, -rage areas and B- "menu, An NFPA 13D sprinkler system with FDC is required (see S&R SPA for requirements), The Designer/ Archi6xl is to contact the appropriate water company to determine the size of the service meter needed m meet suppression and domestic requirements. The suppression connarxor I shall submit three (3) copies of working drawings and calculations to Saratoga Fire Distriet for approval. The sprinkler system and underground water supply mum be installed by a licensed contmmor (City of Sammga Code 16- 20.150, 16-20.160 for fire flow > 2,000 gpm). j4. Driveways: All new or improved di—sys shall be e minimum of fourteen (14') feet wide with one f t of shoulder on each side (City of Sammga Code 16- 15. 200, as required by Saratoga Fire District). An unobstm red vertical clearance shall be not 1 -s than 13'6' (CPC 902.2.2.1). �5. Premises identification: Approved numbers m addresses shall be provided fr all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the stren or road fronting the property (CFC 901,4.4). ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: 397 - 24-105 PROJECT ADDRESS: 18935 Hayfield Court OWNERS NAME: Mike & KHati PICETTI EXISTING USE: VACANT (Residential) ZONING DISTRICT: -'� R -1- 20,000 LOT SIZE, (GROW = E -`) 62,726.40 q.R. (1.44 acre) (NET) 60,08632 +ft. (1.38 aereJ AVG SLOPE 13.8% Lot elope dedaetlaw 60,086.22 - 10,81552 (18 %)= LOT SIZE (NET) for R&R.: 49,270.70 aq.ft. (965 were) 49170.70 -40k- 9.27W k- 937 z 20- 185.41 ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 6,000+ 185.4-- 6,185 sq.R. STRUCTURE. SIZE PROPOSED: 6,184 ea.fl. Main Level Living ern 3,259 sq.R. Garage area 810 sgJL Upper Level Living area 1,950 agJL SW volume 165 M.A. Basement area (exempt from F.A.R.) 1,859 eq.R. FLOOR AREA RATIO PROPOSED (oa NET): 103% ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA RATIO 103 % ALLOWABLEFLOORAREA: 6,185. eq.R.> 6,185sgA IMPERVIOUS SITE COVERAGE: 7,889 art Driveway & Motor Co." 2,570 sgJL Walkways, Porch- &ataops 1150agJt. Residence Footprint 4,069 aq.h ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE.: 35.0% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE: 13.1% AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: 13.8% SLOPE AT BUILDING SITE: 1 1.0 % LOWEST ELEVATION ._._....._._...-_......_,. -. A7X66 HIGHEST ELEVATIOn__..._.. ._..Y......_._...........479.31 AVERAGE ELEVATION POINT....,.....,__, -.-- ..476.48 TOP - MOST ELEVATION POINT _...._...__.......' 5011.79 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A new Single Famify R -idence with Garage & Bssesneal. 5 Bedmoma 5 Bathrooms and 2 Powder Rooms SETBACKS: REQUIRED PROPOSED FRONT 30 67' SIDE RT. 15'/20' 701/85' SIDE LT. IS'/20' 30'155' REAR 35'/45' 60'164' INITY MAP . ILRP a611' 1y !r 9 iY 9 X21 - -' M 47 V1 99 � M h Kw ' w` �g o� o �T a fil H ' W v � � U a� rLh Jar a U IIE � 3 n !`z . nmE w.�r ''T o_-asaan- • GRADING PLAN NOTES 1. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY EARTHWORK /GRADING AC77WTIES, THE PERMITTEE SHALL ARRANGE A PRE - CONSTRUCTION MEETING. THE MEETING SHALL INCLUDE THE CITY OF SARATOGA GRADING INSPECTOR (408 - 868 - 1201), THE GRADING CONTRACTOR AND THE PROJECT SOILS ENGINEER, JERRY FREEMAN (408- 867 - 6321). THE PERMITTEE OR REPRESENTA77VE SHALL ARRANGE THE PRE - CONSTRUCTION MEE77NG AT LEAST 48HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY EARTHWORK /GRADING ACTIVITIES. 2. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN APPLIES ONLY TO THE EXCAVATION, PLACEMENT AND COMPAC77ON OF NATURAL EARTH. THIS APPROVAL DOES NOT CONFER ANY RIGHTS OF ENTRY TO EITHER PUBLIC PROPERTY OR THE PRIVATE PROPERTY OF OTHERS. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN DOES NOT CONST177JTE APPROVAL OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS. ANY PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES AND ALL OTHER PERMITS' /APPROVALS SHALL BE OBTAINED. J. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE TO IDENTIFY, LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL UNDERGROUND FACILITIES. 4. THE PERMITTEE SHALL MAINTAIN ALL STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND OTHER PUBLIC RIGHT -OF WAYS IN A CLEAN, SAFE AND USABLE CONDITION. ALL SPILLS OF SOIL, ROCK OR CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PUBLIC PROPERTY. ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CLEAN, SAFE AND USABLE CONDITION. 5. ALL GRADING AND EARTHWORK ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO COMPLY WITH STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT FOR AIRBORNE PARTICULATES. 6. ALL KNOWN WATER WELL LOCA77ONS ON SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED OR ABANDONED ACCORDING TO CURRENT REGULA77ONS ADMINISTERED BY THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT. CALL 408 -265 -2600 X2660 TO ARRANGE FOR DISTRICT OBSERVA71ON OF WELL ABANDONMENT. 7 THIS PLAN DOES NOT APPROVE THE REMOVAL OF ANY TREES. APPROPRIATE TREE REMOVAL PERMITS SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ANY REQUIRED TREE PROTEC77ON MEASURES SHALL BE. MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. B. THE PROJECT CARL ENGINEER, GIULIANI AND KULL, INC. HAS DESIGNED THIS PROJECT TO COMPLY WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY JERRY FREEMAN AT JF CONSULTING. 9. ALL GRADING AND EARTHWORK ACTIW77ES SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. ALL GRADING AND EARTHWORK AC77077ES SHALL BE OBSERVED AND APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OR EARTHWORK ACTIVITIES. UNOBSERVED OR UNAPPROVED WORK SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED UNDER OBSERVA77ON OF THE PROJECT SOILS ENGINEER. CONTACT JERRY FREEMAN AT 408- 867 -6321. 10. ALL CONSTRUCTION SITES ARE TO BE WINTERIZED WITH APPROPRIATE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IN PLACE FROM OCTOBER 15TH TO APRIL 15TH OF EACH YEAR. 11. GRADING ACTIVITIES ARE ONLY ALLOWED MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, 730 AM TO 6:00 PM. 12. ALL KNOWN EXIS77NG U77LITY LINES ARE SHOWN FOR INFORMA77ON ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE ALL NECESSARY CAUTION TO AVOID DAMAGE TO ANY EXISTING U77LITY LINES OR FACILITIES TO REMAIN IN PLACE, WHETHER OR NOT SUCH FACIL177ES APPEAR ON THESE PLANS, AND SHALL BEAR FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGE THERETO. 13 CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT BOTH UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (800- 227 -2600) AND THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY PRIOR TO STARTING WORK TO REQUEST AND OBTAIN THE MARKING OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND FACIL177ES 14. ENGINEER SHALL BEAR NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR METHODS AND PROCEDURES OF WORK ESTABLISHED BY CONTRACTOR, JOBSITE CONDITIONS, JOBSITE SAFETY OR CONFORMANCE WITH SAFETY PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS. 15. A REPRESENTATIVE OF 714E SOILS ENGINEER SHALL BE ON SITE DURING GRADING OPERA77ONS AND SHALL PERFORM SUCH TES77NG AS DEEMED NECESSARY. THE REPRESENTATIVE SHALL OBSERVE THE GRADING OPERATION FOR CONDITIONS THAT SHOULD BE CORRECTED, AND IDEN77FY THOSE CONDITIONS WITH RECOMMENDE CORRECTIVE MEASUR GRADING PLAN FOR PICETTI RESIDENCE AT 18935 HAYFIELD COURT SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA ABBREVIATIONS AB AGGREGATE BASE RWO REDWOOD Sa SLOPE AC ASPHALT CONCRETE GND GROUND SSCO SEWER CLEANOUT AD AREA DRAIN GM GAS METER SD STORM DRAIN BLDG BUILDING GT GRATE SOCO STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT BS BOTTOM O FS TEP HC HANDICAP RAMP SOE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT BW BASE OF WALL HP HIGH POINT SS SANITARY SEWER B/W BACK OF WALK ICV IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE SSE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT CB CATCH BASIN INV INVERT ELEVATION 5TA. STA77ON C CENTERLINE JP JOINT UTILITY POLE T TELEPHONE C.L. CENTERLINE JT JOINT TRENCH TEL TELEPHONE DD DECK DRAIN LF LINEAR FEET TB TOP OF BANK DI DROP INLET LT. LEFT TIC TOP OF CURB D/W DRIVEWAY MIN MINIMUM IS TOE OF STEP E ELECTRICAL MH MANHOLE TW TOP OF WALL ELEC. ELECTRICAL OG OUTSIDE GRADE VG VALLEY GUTTER EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT OH OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE W WATER EUC EUCALYPTUS TREE PSE PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT WM WATER METIER EX. EXIS77NO PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE WV WATER VALVE FG FINISH GRADE P PAVEMENT FF FINISH FLOOR RCP REINFORCED CONC, PIPE FH FIRE HYDRANT P.L. PROPERTY LINE FL FLOWLINE PP POWER POLE FS FINISH SURFACE RT. RIGHT G GB GAS GRADE BREAK R/W RIGHT OF WAY Ut!AIL A Ut IAIL tl DRAINAGE OUTFALL DETAIL N.T.S. 1. 2 LAYER 3" TO 6" COBBLES WELT. LAID -LEVEL 2. MIRAFI 140 NC. J. PERF. PVC SDR -35, OR BETTER, SAME DIAMETER AS SUPPLY LINE 4. 1 112" DRAIN ROCK, HARD, CLEAN, DURABLE. 5. 24" WIDE BY 36" DEEP TRENCH. 6. GRATED, REMOVABLE CAP 7. 48 "X4" REDWOOD MARKER POST - PAINTED WHITE. B. CHRISTY BOX WITH REMOVABLE SOLD LID. a jOGP ALLENDALE h �P� suoow yP s wr S 4 SITE 10 S C'9T os G VICINITY MAP N.T.S. ! � cncs�n QStOEESSION q�Ap A fto 2 NO. 048168 * EXP. 0 -00 -08 9 CIVIL T2 OF CAL1��4 PROPOSED EXISTING CUT 1,150 CY. SAME DIAMETER o ' ^r--� L�J SOR 35, OR BETTER rn 1,230 CY. PLACE ON CONTOUR n 8 DUE TO SITE CONDITIONS AND MATERIAL PERT B -LZi I 60' MINIMUM WATER VALVE PLAN Ut!AIL A Ut IAIL tl DRAINAGE OUTFALL DETAIL N.T.S. 1. 2 LAYER 3" TO 6" COBBLES WELT. LAID -LEVEL 2. MIRAFI 140 NC. J. PERF. PVC SDR -35, OR BETTER, SAME DIAMETER AS SUPPLY LINE 4. 1 112" DRAIN ROCK, HARD, CLEAN, DURABLE. 5. 24" WIDE BY 36" DEEP TRENCH. 6. GRATED, REMOVABLE CAP 7. 48 "X4" REDWOOD MARKER POST - PAINTED WHITE. B. CHRISTY BOX WITH REMOVABLE SOLD LID. a jOGP ALLENDALE h �P� suoow yP s wr S 4 SITE 10 S C'9T os G VICINITY MAP N.T.S. ! � cncs�n QStOEESSION q�Ap A fto 2 NO. 048168 * EXP. 0 -00 -08 9 CIVIL T2 OF CAL1��4 PROPOSED EXISTING CUT 1,150 CY. - - -� PROPERTY LINE ' ^r--� L�J 950 CY. BUILDING FOOTPRINT 1,230 CY. { L-.—� AC PAVEMENT ACTUAL EARTHWORK QUANTITIES MAY VARY DUE TO SITE CONDITIONS AND MATERIAL FIRE HYDRANT INDEPENDENT ESTIMATE PRIOR TO BIDDING. O'er WATER VALVE ❑"RT WATER METER 0 JOINT POLE 5" Oo SANITARY MANHOLE 0 STORM DRAIN MANHOLE o O � SANITARY CLEANOUT �O5`' ®j TREE } EX. TREE TO BE REMOVED CONTOUR LINE t ®�0 CATCH BASIN AREA DRAIN — — — — -- — -- EASEMENT LINE B.S.L. — — — — — — BUILDING SETBACK LINE —OR— —OR -- DRAINAGE FLOW RETAINING WALL —x —x M— FENCE LINE m - -SD -- STORM DRAIN LINE --SS-- SANITARY SEWER LINE - -W -- WATER LINE —G— GAS LINE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES CUT 1,150 CY. BASEMENT CUT 1,030 CY. FILL 950 CY. EXPORT 1,230 CY. ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ESTIMATED EARTHWORK. ACTUAL EARTHWORK QUANTITIES MAY VARY DUE TO SITE CONDITIONS AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE INDEPENDENT ESTIMATE PRIOR TO BIDDING. �° zz N Q W Z_3N 6 u rn 0 F>rl R m • a 0 i m0 °a • 2 10 c §!— S aroa I• � v 01.. V J w LL Lt) M r c z Q Z V SHEET 1 Z 5 (L w 0 Z 0 it O LL J V Q 0 O N I OF 2 1 DATE 7 -14 -06 OB NO 04198 m 'S' �, \ / "V s\ i Jf - i T i ". I \ \ / \/f l 1 / O Ln Vk'+N1 it 7 N, ai A. hA f€ , - - J 9 -j :8'9£'9. • �� Tom- - _ �.� � � ' - - MATE STREET x_ w w y n s1w — w ... w. �-- w— w —k \ s- 1 w__ DOUGLASS — i,a V a� *REGISZp' v° 3 o DATE REVISIONS SCALE 18935 HAYFIELD COURT Giulimid & Kull, Inc. - -- DRAWN BV N N GRADING AND E.t. Co. p 4880 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 205, San Jose, CA 95129 DESIGNED BY DRAINAGE PLAN (408) 615 -4000 Fax (408) 615 -4004 S.R. 0) SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA Auburn • San Jose • Oakdale CHECKED BY S.R. 06/0/04 01­1­PDT II \ \ •, I1, I X/ . \N/\I/ \ ohi/ � / 1 -- � 1 Z -, IX I I o r \ LQ • W -- _ I / 1 -'f f4 1 I I DO 11 LASS \ — — LA - � `s \------ - - - - -- W � \ � o DATE REMSIONS SCALE SITE SURVEY 18935 HAYFIELD COURT Giuliani & Kull, Inc. C) o rn C,,i c) and r a > a r DRAWN BY E.T. I r \ LQ • W -- _ I / 1 -'f f4 1 I I DO 11 LASS \ — — LA - � `s \------ - - - - -- W � DATE REMSIONS SCALE SITE SURVEY 18935 HAYFIELD COURT Giuliani & Kull, Inc. C) o rn C,,i '•. and DRAWN BY E.T. � °D 4980 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 205, San Jose, CA 95129 DESIGNED By p (408) 615 -4000 Fax (408) 615 -4004 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA Auburn • San Jose • Oakdale CHECKED BY • 0 ARBORIST :RECOMMENDATIONS ' RECOMI1fENDATTONS All w 0- -dedom pesented b Jaw m ivtmdM a ffidg.b aey tameable lenpux m . Me bore an ec W fm remndm u web a removm. ShoWa phew b r-,.4 the reeommevdabM m y tequim mmiao.mn. Da 4n Gvlddhta 1. ]he ptvpmed gredmg embwa rMmla b mdadgme m b a kax be Eat floor tree . . . g3Y ll,e lie pmpm 412 -113, ha[h tboWdbmtlai¢mEbbakau 20 feu fivm Me bwta of tree Nli.nd l3. 2. The eam.te mwk 1—llw end aevopy dmeaiam of tree Q ­t S7 A wd b added w Sbu 2 AddidomllY. Sheeu 2 ebd LI ehovld b +wiud b chow Met the five - tree dacdbed m tlu pmviom pegs (fits pmgmph 6om mp) have .4-0 b- 3. Mdpdm for tree g2'. low ebvN leery tlx lmmWd ®o[gx two COOLBw_.. . ... end two C+BU Live Oaks of 24tvL bin sEs MBm pmpoua w Sba LI. 4 mtainadtrwm�3echo Wbeamwdtedb Metme�wf �'a uWevedb. cenopio a. I . Any enJbg• embed bodetV-1 vtUftLdwMem• Ibex m plpee bbetlh 0. tree• cenopin shoWa be.bem amain oHuaxfadgg w6 ¢cede. 6. T— �apgd maagefawe- -dwdwmpwb,. -be deJgd.o ro wweNs mvar Me trwb afmuived bee. ". Upone a eb liry, bovda¢ro may IrY aeaig hmabr evsM velmpam. I dK laidon of l Cfta Promchion c mro tb T ) ra of fins) bWWbg pdm and b Addidm lly,the Site PIwabou3d Wow pmtadKr 'ng.. idtm6eamme.menm map. . 11ur ve,tp,wwubwmemvd value tlao l6 cod is. mWeimbmdtnm wO the Gu;et '.' '. ju Pb dppgaeI YPQ puWlebedby de Etumaooe Sam, f Mo' huno$A),$mq. 9 Thdf inm¢guvlegmesbWdb+nmrymated mtv Me Ntwe dmgv o[the bckyard - ' iavdwapivg. AnY pIw metmiJ .1 d baaW Me voce csvop+a should b dmagbt -telecom aea mmpavU. bevmM Oaks 16 db ummmevd bt plan mJe a compdws ttbi 15-a19-- lofeheBu bevmth dm cevopia. b. Avy tremhb g ft b ®don, ¢helve a do vs¢e should b do g ad . tvbev u • enmpma Vvmgedav Lou ekam ricel lcev fee ligbtaog m dmgenm geed h Jm& Mammld b d emNiWadno tloec Wan fivedorm and fmilof the g,,4trunk; tf thiscotb pouiblt Me Iwo cev b plead m cop of ewong aJl Bede and cavemd wdh - wood ahim or otbrwulch ' c Imgtlon ehmW mtevmr bwaM tb vea•e.mpm d . Stvnn, vmlri m abler Wdwem Erwa Wowld b m Imes ma-fam fbm d. ambofmamedheaeffi vatbl t=tbt mth the tnmkaofmw tree e I Y Wi m . weei l of tb mPwd bvertb Me tree' mnopla veer b evoidrQ . final I for 11- tmvtrol f Bender l or abler edged it pm ....math Me bete' ampia ehmld - beembluhedw cop ofumvvg and grade (sucbm by udng fYN Prorectlen Ma.mta ' 10. Tine pmvxttva fmnivg Owl e i uuw wsbownm dm smJud mp—iu Vuhtd ' poor m cry emfea aaepieg, grtdby, CamtmcGw w bevy equipment srdvinY m w !1 W W be mwpdwd of five. m sakes hi¢h sham Imk momtd m eight -foot t.H.inch di. —gW_ 1 Wtr+. Mivea M Inert inm dm gmwd W epu l dun 10l eWr Ova embadwd, tlw tamed mart mmJn uadietmbdeM . ' b mmnleimE theoughmt the amewcdm pwcmr mW 6m1 mpmiw. . I I. U-1— athawnw qo.-d, 0 mnemxdm uavatra twrt b condmrcd ouxida Ma deJ®lse:d tevicea sane (evm soa Evung h mmved). Theca udvit es m !We, but nsemWlY hvnud a, tb b6onng autf�a reNio¢. ®admg, vwcbivg, WufOmuv Jmmng, emckpdbg vod Mtmpiag mevnala (iuhJwg sod 611), evd . aryipmem/vebick apeman mtd parka,. - 12. Any epptoved gm ng m trtuldng bme the bees' emopia shell be e—Ily perf. -w mi.9 e_als 3. ThuemoJ art pmvbg of tre m b peJbnmd orde des wpem o an NSA CaN6M AMOdx and according ro 13A stavdmde. . la. The diepoml of hertNLl pmMOm. (msuchmm cb® lw 06 _l Buohv.) u e WbjW boats mwpia m mYwbae dut .11— drabege bmeaM evmPla. Addidwally, 6x1 WmW test b .wed mr JWI emj tedxlivg w rminmuva of wutweat mein wtMw loo fatofh vea'mmke.' -_ 15 Hcrb ciao ahmb amt b applied b<meM tle mWm of.embad tray VAme axd on ub, Meymvrt b labeled fur mfr vin var tins. TRRE IrrvRNT•oxv TIBER _ -..._ ., �aHAa>ti \I / / / GRAPHIC SCALE / g$ 9 _ _ 3 J w t YFIELD comer H _.. 3g• S .xe. 2. 1 ! 'pyaEA fy�f I� SITE PLAN .sc te.. r!- •_15'0 °..... I I I I di ,I I I I I I I I I Iql I I I I 11 � __ _I I� L1 15. ?s J 1\ \ I i \ nI / / _j ' � FBV1010N0 BY SITE PLAN NOTES i 1. Z INDICATES MAIN FLOOR FOOTPRINT 2. --INDICATES UPPER FLOOR FOOTPRINT, !; %11}7,7, (INDICATE BASEMENT FLOOR j FOOTPRINT (BOLD DOTTED LINE W I NATCHINGAREAIrlcluda'Light Wells') 4. —'--- INDICATES STEPS IN MAIN FLOOR Refer w GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN for Elevations (LIGHT DASHED LINES) INDICATES RETAINING WALLS. Ref W GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN for j Elevations 6. INDICATES'HARDSCAPED AREAS' '—i Refer to LANDSCAPE PLAN for Materiab ero � M V c w w ° l(5 s M a u!I T I M••1 u xt 0 Ile � V 5.crt',m.f, .ea. aeo. A •O 0 A 0• �yy]tit P7 F � �j O q � y '� ty 19 ,� p� 7qo t7ym d. x � 3� Mike & Kristi PICETTI ___ _- _ _._ -_ -- - - -_ -- _- 18935 Hayfield Coart Saratoga, Cafifomia 9507P- � - Gienn CAHOON < 41469 Millennium Terrace Fremont, California 94538 Phone(510)623 -7896 Fax(510)573 -0529 E -mail: glenncahoon @comcast.net m qqgg i Mike & Kristi PICETTI ___ _- _ _._ -_ -- - - -_ -- _- 18935 Hayfield Coart Saratoga, Cafifomia 9507P- � - Gienn CAHOON < 41469 Millennium Terrace Fremont, California 94538 Phone(510)623 -7896 Fax(510)573 -0529 E -mail: glenncahoon @comcast.net m BACK PATIO BREAKFAST NOOK f/ I ROOM F.F. 415.00 FI R .II ill a KITCHEN J. DN, F.F. 475.16 GALLERI TERRACE FORMAL DINING — r F.F. 473.00 ESLAB 4n.45 Cl 4?&4 L UTILITY NMI tO M. WEST SUITE F.F. 418.42, . L I BRARY-OFFIGE GRAND FOYER LIVING ROOM FA .16,n F.F. 4M IF. 475.16 /514" OIL",e 94 ' 24. MAIN FLOOR PLAN 4 1 4 8 O -=--mmmmj gal Izz! C'. C= . L N07-V prceTJi A.2 Mike & Kristi PICETTI a 18935 Hayfield Court Saratoga, California 95070 _GI&hn CAHOON' .41469 Millennium Terrace Fremont, California 94538 Phone(510)623 -7896 Fax(510)573 -0529 E-mail: glenncahoon@comcast.net 1. CLASS A'BARREL TILE ROOFING ROOFING APPLIED AS PER MANUFACTURE S SPEC'S. OVER AN 5:12 PITCHED FRAMING COLOR: TERRA -COTTA MIX TYPICAL. j ICBO9 . LESS THAN 121h. PER SQUARE FOOT. 2. INSTALL TWO LAYERS 308 FELT UNDER - LAYMENT FOR "LE ROOFING �3. CLASS A'MBTechnalogy'TORCB -DOWN BUILT- UPROOFING APPLIEDAS PER MANUFACTURES SPECS. FOR UL APPROVED CLASS A ROOFINGASSEMBLY. Referto auarhed Abby WmrdSperlf,-ie- LESS THAN 51b. PER SQUARE FOOT, APPLIED OVER IN ": 12" MIN. SLOPE A ropy of the UL report (or equal) for the roof ring shall be prexat at the time of iaspecrioa. 4. ROOF - RAFTER FRAMINGAT MIN. SLOPED AREAS TO BE INSTALLED WITH 1/4 ";12" SLOPE FRAMING 5. PAINTED (26 ga.g.i.) GRAVEL STOP & FLASH'G 6. PAINTED 5" (26 ga.g.L) CURVED FASCIA GUTTER OVER 2.8 PRE - PRIMED SPRUCE FASCIA BOARD Z 3"DLI. S DOWN- SPOUT 7. SKYLIGHTS 19RISTOLIGHT OR EQ. SIZE NOTED ON PLAN 9. WROUGHT IRON GUARDRAIL AT TILE FINISHED DECK- BALCONY 9. PAINTED SHROUDS OVER SPARK ARRESTER CHIMNEY. O � O O � M r x�o V " O W 5�g r%t lag C I W iA•1� U FBI ? ZA y •aal 'e it 9 y on.ww _SEPY 1-211 /Di _!✓DYED ;.. ' '.. .cn wo. A.4 • s • Dksux ,T. me for Mike & Kristi PICETTI - - -- _- — -� _ . 18935 Ha�etd Court Saratoga, California 95070 - GI �217i CE'1ROON 41469 Millennium Terrace Fremont, California 94538 �d Phone(510)623 -7896 Fax(510)573 -0529 E -mail: glenncahcon @comcast.net . p� M �u 1ppQ Y y N Dksux ,T. me for Mike & Kristi PICETTI - - -- _- — -� _ . 18935 Ha�etd Court Saratoga, California 95070 - GI �217i CE'1ROON 41469 Millennium Terrace Fremont, California 94538 �d Phone(510)623 -7896 Fax(510)573 -0529 E -mail: glenncahcon @comcast.net . ,z. O � m vl U U � w b V O e H � U �y U l own ...,.APkJL ZCLU /Y7JE0 v p /cE�i -err ¢evr7ron� A.6 .... c iTr' XTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES: L BARREL FILE ROOFING MATERIAL SELECT ED BY OWNER APPLIED AS PER MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATIONS. I.C.B.O. 0 d 2- LAYERS 309 FELT 2. GRAVEL.ITORCH -DOWN BUILT- UPROOFING _ ve I Applied u per —fectured spxifications o r 1 1/4 ": 12" min slope. PROVIDE (26 gs_g.i) . _ PAINTED FLASHING with GRAVEL STOP 3. 5" (20g —peer) HALF -ROUND FASCIAGUTI'ER 01 2x8 PRE - PRIMED SPRUCE FASCIA BOARD 2 14. 4x8 PRE - PRIMED SPRUCE BARGE RAFTER w/ RADIUS CUT TAILS Z Yj I5. GABLE END VENTS w/ WROUGHF IRON DECOR of i6. WOOD WINDOWS w/ CLADDING Selected by oar g1 rev ! 7. SKY LIGHTS (Refer w Roof Plans) 8. PANTED (26 ge.g.i.) SHROUD .1 SPARK j ARRESTER, LOCATED 2' HIGHER THAN 10' AWAY. 9. 2 "'SHADOW CHANNEL 110. 7/8" THREE COAT STUCCO SMOOTH FINISH OVER TWO LAYERS TYPE D BUILDING PAPER y IL CAST-STONE WINDOW SILLS TY. 12. STONE VENEER Selected by O—r K !13. 6.6 PRE-PRIIEDSPRUCEEAVE CORBEL OUT- RIGGERS EQ. DIVIDED @>24 "o.c. 114. HINGEDANCHORED WOOD SHUTTERS w/ W L `S' SHAPED LACKS '�. 15. WROUGHT IRON BALCONY RAI S `S' SHAPED AT LIGHT WELLS & TERRACE STRAIGHT BOX' TYPE 16. CLAY PGTMASONRY CHIMNEY CAPS 17. OVERHEAD SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR SELECTED BY OWNER - 18. FINISHED GRADE ,z. O � m vl U U � w b V O e H � U �y U l own ...,.APkJL ZCLU /Y7JE0 v p /cE�i -err ¢evr7ron� A.6 .... c f Q IN X11-4 L mm i' m r M a z ' . r2bt, 577FUGTLIKE NE /�i//T' RvFRg9E = 26�o G i �.. -hi9x: � STieucTUreE N6iryM' �nvEwt�E _ 26� 0 "- - ' L I New Femly Home f - - Mike & Kristi PICETTI -- -n-n— Z�Ie CAHOON . 18935 Hayfield Court Saratoga California 95070 41469 Millennium Terrace Fremont, California 94538 Phone(510)623 -7896 Fax(510)573 -0529 E -mail: glenncahoon@mmcast.net C z a f Q IN X11-4 L mm i' m r M a z ' . r2bt, 577FUGTLIKE NE /�i//T' RvFRg9E = 26�o G i �.. -hi9x: � STieucTUreE N6iryM' �nvEwt�E _ 26� 0 "- - ' L I New Femly Home f - - Mike & Kristi PICETTI -- -n-n— Z�Ie CAHOON . 18935 Hayfield Court Saratoga California 95070 41469 Millennium Terrace Fremont, California 94538 Phone(510)623 -7896 Fax(510)573 -0529 E -mail: glenncahoon@mmcast.net • r • i -N F 1 Homef Mike & Kristi PICETTI __ - - - -- _ J38 Glenn CAHO18935 Ha dCoart Sant ytid ga, California 95070 41469 Millennium Terrace Fremont, California 9Phone(510)623 -7896 Fax (510)573 - E -mail: gleancahoon @comcast.net °< j = 20 ft. A / r '9 n Nf / I Ad PE Ad Ad Ad A 484 3 i STONE9Rt� WALL 2 i �O � I/ OE� 476 S MY I j ,c720 46z I 6' / c Cr Wr x,'9.5 - i I j 1 C Mp to ,f ONE COLUMN o s t JJ yg6 3 1/2' ��% :a7 / / I & W 1. FENCE r a LM t o X75 3 f tt oAD 'k�id'3��b 4i5 �) HAYFIELD C7ENCE i 13 A5_g5 ! J0' COURT A M /i I oL l03 p6 ! t r -BOA s s ARCH. I t i 1 � r r t p ° t t / t t ! Mp I t % Ls y ^rVCyj d Ad cq yn y d y / h 452 �Ad 450 - QA 0 i z Landscape Plan 0 10' 20' / General Legend I DR1v ock,rlg Prvlrg stow. fq­9 ewv b' cal Btoro a eppreved equst Earth 9 N 5 tone col «.. Paver ml« to match a <evpalalwrt hauw +tone veneer. --'i Fr �+i rrorxrl . EN.Ri u4eLic: F,ey.ta» .�� Flege<die mbr anNa type to patch a coapllmsR hww +l«r valet. r•£iAMRYa WALL6 Gacrete dell w +tans vraw. Grope col« ardor typs to matrJi a cagllerit hsus .tan. vanew. I Planting Legend KEY OTT. ME i BOTANICAL NAME GORTON NAME REMARK" TREES AM 2 24' box Arbutus Meriro Hybrid Medran 8terderd LM 2 24' box Lag -situ M 'Muekagee' Gape Myrtle Standard OE 1 24' box Oleo e. Swan MITI Frultleae Olive PE 2 24' box Sequole aemp- Vlrena cadet Retlurood QA 3 24' box Orrwe aG-clle Coaet Live Oak OB 1 60' box (di -ne egr .u. Goeat Ll— Oak OI I 36' box. Ou -cu+ Ilex Holly Oak sMd1B5/VINE5 Ad 16 5 Gal. ArctoetepFylloe d. -w, and ii-, Menzanite be IT 5 gel AnleodoMea x Fypomandanan Cape Ma 11ow Bt e 5 gel t. 'Atropwpaee' Rrple Barba N b 22 1 Gal Buxue J Gann Beauty' Japeneae 5oxwoad u 5 5 gal caerotiva 'caricla' Wild Lilac Cr W 5q.1 Correa p 't'lieaion Belie' Auetr P- Fudvia E. 22 5 gel Eecallonia 'Newport D-", Dwarf Spiry Eaullonla Jp 3 5 gel Jeemiraan polyenthwn Pink Jeemina- vine La 10 5 gal Lever -a maritime Trwe Mellow Lr 0 9 gal Laopelelim c Burgundy' Fi+ige Flow - My B 5 gal I'tyriU ceilfomica Pacific Wax Myrtle - D I0 5 gel I Phormitm 'Duet' 1 Flax J 3 f gai Flwrmi -'Jadt Eprett' Flax Pm 13 5 gel P---. iatropurpureun mmpactun'Flex Po B 5 gel f n4 I. Otto Luyken' E,,,914h Lewei Rr 24 2 gel Rove Flow- cerpat Flown Carpet Roae- Derk Pink RI 4'I 5 gel 1 Roemeriru+'C011irywood Ingram' Roeamery Sr Si. 5 gei Sarcoccocce nuciF011a' Fragrant sarcoccocce 5 30 19.1 I sollye Mt- ophylla Awtralian Bluebell TJ 5 5 gal Tradnloepennum Jaem,noldee star Jaem,— -vine Vt 18 5 gel Viburnum t Spring Bouquet' Vlburrcxn W 24 5 gel I Uleetrlr,gla r. tUpuyebe Gem' Coaa< Roeenery GROIWD GOVERSrPEREMilAL9 Ep B i gel Euryope p 'virldla Golden SYrub Delay' I 3 I gal Irle DOUglaalana I Douglae Iri+ V R e' Lvrd- P li I 8tetice - flare Myoponal parVifoll- Tralllrlg Myoparum 36' oc. +pacing sc - 7Q.1 I Sceevota 'stricta' Fan Flow- 30' O.C. +pecirg Sod Lawn - 'Medallion' DwarF Feecue by Pacirtc god or approved equal w/ 2' x 4' 'Bend a Board' by Epic cr approved equal ee� TN ,23 rM 1,; V G �v VA�'v£ 4G W U ^C W ^N O C W 0 � U +++-+ Co Q% to O M _ tD CL ?2 CU DR/lbl Cfil/KS Jul '06 I L1 OF I • • • Item 4 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No./Location: 06-292; 20625 Marion Avenue Type of Application: Design Review Owner/Applicant: Renn / Cross Staff Planner: Shweta Bhatt, Assistant Planner Meeting Date: March 14, 2007 APN: 503-22-101 Department Ilead: John F. Livingstone, AICP r 2 IS 6 ps zi M 4'.... DR. 62 110 V., V0 3e!- nT -a W !km. GIL V5, 21 96 !9 101, Z FLO. ZIP,, A, Subject: N 20625 Marion Avenue ;9� Z. APN: 503-22-101 W L A 500' Radius 20625 Marion Avenue Application No. 06 -292; 20625 Marion Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY: Application filed: 03/07/06 Application complete: 02/21/07 Notice published: 03/07/07 Mailing completed: 02/24/07 Posting completed: 03/08/07 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct a new single -story single - family dwelling and detached two -car garage. The dwelling will consist of approximately 3,818 square feet of floor area and a basement. The detached garage will be approximately 663 square feet. The height of the structure will not exceed the 26 -foot height limitation. The gross lot size is approximately 21,780 square feet and the site is located in the R -1- 12,500 zoning district. Design Review approval by the- Planning Commission is required pursuant to Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.060. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve this design review application by adopting the attached resolution with conditions. Staff is not recommending any permanent conditions of approval. • Application No. 06 -292; 20625 Marion Avenue 0 STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R -1- 12,500 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: MLD (Medium Density Residential) MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE: Approximately 21,780 gross square feet and approximately 20,936 net square feet SLOPE: Approximately 2.38% GRADING REQUIRED: There will be minimal grading required for this project. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed new single - family residence is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single - family residences. MATERIALS AND COLORS: The proposed materials and colors consist of exterior stucco in an olive green color, complemented by stone veneer, composition shingle roofing, and aluminum clad windows in a cream color. A color and materials board will be available at the public hearing. �J Application No. 06 -•292; 20625 Marion Avenue PROJECT DATA R -1- 12,500 Zonin g Proposed Required Site Coverage Residence: 3,183 SF (15.2 %) Maximum Attached Garage: 635 SF (3.0 %) Allowable = Detached Garage: 663 SF (3.2 %) 11,514.8 SF (55 %) Other Impervious Areas: 6,790 SF (32.4 %) TOTAL Site Coverage i 11,271 SF (53.8 %) Floor Area Main House Area: 3,183 SF Maximum Attached Garage Area: 635 SF Allowable = Detached Garage Area: 663 SF 4,518 SF TOTAL Floor Area 4,481 SF Setbacks Main House Detached Garage Front: 25' 159' 25,'. Rear: 2553" 25' 25' Left (West) Side: 15' 9" 12' 10' Right (East) Side: 10' 1" 45' 10' Height Lowest Elevation Point: 483.80 Maximum Height = Highest Elevation Point: 485.50 510.65 (26 Feet) Average Elevation Point: 484.65 Proposed Topmost Point: 509.14 (241619) PROJECT DISCUSSION Site Characteristics and Project Description The applicant is requesting design review approval to construct a new home with an attached garage and basement. A detached garage is also proposed. The existing home and accessory structures are proposed to be demolished. The subject site is located on Marion Avenue, which is accessed from Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road. The shape of the lot is best described as trapezoidal, with the narrower frontage on Marion Avenue. The .subject parcel and the surrounding area are relatively flat; however the single -story residence directly to the West is situated . at a slightly higher topography. An existing two -story residence is to the East of the subject property. Project Design Characteristics The proposed home is rustic in appearance, as it features stone veneer on several accent walls, carriage style garage doors, and exposed lintels. However, the home also features contemporary elements such as roof - mounted solar panels on the west elevation. The applicant proposes the exterior to be olive green stucco, which is compatible to the rustic • • Application No. 06 -292; 20625 Marion Avenue design of the home and the rural atmosphere of the surrounding properties. Staff finds the overall design of the home to be consistent, well - detailed, and aesthetically pleasing. The entryway of the home is off - center on the front fagade and is a marked by stone and a tall gable element, while the garage has been recessed to the rear of the parcel. The detached garage is located towards the rear third of the parcel and is subordinate in size and sympathetically designed to the main structure. Staff is able to make design review findings for the proposed structure, particularly given the detailed design and choice of materials. Neighbor Review The applicant has informed neighbors of the project and notification letters have been attached to this staff report to reflect these efforts. Staff has not received any further comments as of the preparation of this staff report. Trees The arborist has inventoried a total of four (4) trees for this project, all of which may be protected through the construction phase with appropriate tree fencing. The property owner will be required to post a tree bond equal in value to these trees ($26,200) prior to issuance of City permits. Geotechnical Clearance Geotechnical Clearance has been granted for this project as required for the proposed basement. General Plan Findings The proposed project is consistent with the following General Plan Policies: Conservation Element Policy 6.0 - Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. The project consists of a new one -story single - family residence. Proposed building materials consist of earth tone colors and the design is rustic. in appearance. The project is well designed and incorporates architectural detailing to help break up massing and bulk of the structure. Land Use Element Policy 5.0 -The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the Findings required for Design Approval. The home is well designed with detailed architectural features. • Application No. 06 -292, 20625 Marion Avenue - Design Review Findings The proposed project is consistent with all the following Design Review findings stated in City Code Section 15- 45.080: (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The project meets this finding in that the proposal is single - story. Additionally, the main residence is located as far to the front of the property as possible to assist in retaining hillside views of the neighbors to the rear of the subject property. (b) Preserve. Natural Landscape. The project meets this finding in that no trees are proposed for removal. Minimal grading and topographical changes are proposed in conjunction with this project. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. The project meets this finding in that all Arborist report recommendations have been made conditions of approval of the .project to ensure a high degree of survival for all trees retained on site. These trees will be protected during the construction process with tree fencing and the applicant will be required to post a tree bond prior to issuance of City permits. .(d) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. This finding can be made in the. affirmative in that the project has been designed with varied materials that accentuate architectural features. The perceived mass and bulk of the front fagade has been reduced because the stone veneer will accent the entry way. Also, the garage has been recessed further towards the rear of the lot and will only be apparent from the side. 'The structure is well articulated and incorporates varied rooflines. Furthermore, the applicant proposes earth -tone exterior color that will blend well with the rural appearance of the surrounding area. (e) Compatible bulk.and height. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the structure is well- suited for the surrounding neighborhood. A two -story home currently exists to the East of the subject property. A recently constructed single - story home exists to the West of the subject property, but is located on a parcel . that is slightly higher in topography when compared to the subject property. (f) Current grading and erosion control methods. The proposal would conform to the City's current grading and erosion control methods. The applicant is required to maintain stormwater on site where feasible and therefore this finding may be made in the affirmative. (g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding. unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above. Additionally, the applicant proposes roof - mounted solar panels, consistent with the design policy handbook. This finding may be made in the affirmative. Application No. 06 -292; 20625 Marion Avenue 0 Conclusion Staff finds that the Design Review findings can be made in the affirmative. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve design review application 06- 292 with conditions by adopting the attached resolution. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution of Approval for Design Review. 2. Arborist Report, dated March 30, 2006. 3. Affidavit of mailing notices, public hearing notice, and copy of mailing labels for project notification. 4. Neighbor review letters. 5. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A." is Attachment 1 • • 0 APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 07-039 Application No. 06 -292 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gerald and Patricia Renn; 20625 Marion Avenue Approval of a new single story home with basement WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review to construct a new single story 3,183 square foot home, 635 square foot attached garage, and 663 square foot detached garage. The new home will be less than 26 feet in height and will be situated on a 20,936 (net) square foot lot. The lot is situated in the R -1- 12,500 zoning district; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, the project, which proposes to construct a new single family residence is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This Class 3 exemption applies to construction of a single family home in an urbanized area; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for design review approval, and the following findings specified in City Code Section 15- 45.080 and the City's Residential Design Handbook have been determined: NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The project meets this finding in that the proposal is single -story. Additionally, the main residence is located as far to the front of the property as possible to assist in retaining hillside views of the neighbors to the rear of the subject property. b) Preserve Natural Landscape. The project meets this finding in that no trees are proposed for removal. Minimal grading and topographical changes are proposed in conjunction with this project. c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. The project meets this finding in that all Arborist report recommendations have been made conditions of approval of the project to ensure a high degree of survival for all trees retained on site. These Application No. 06.292, 20625 Marion Avenue trees will be protected during the construction process with tree fencing and the applicant will be required to post a tree bond prior to issuance of City permits. d) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the project has been designed with varied materials that accentuate architectural features. The perceived mass and bulk of the front facade has been reduced because the stone veneer will accent the entry way. Also, the garage has been recessed further towards the rear of the lot and will only be apparent from the side. The structure is well articulated and incorporates varied rooflines. Furthermore, the applicant proposes earth -tone exterior color that will blend well with the rural appearance of the surrounding area. e) Compatible bulk and height. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the structure is well- suited for the surrounding neighborhood. A two -story home currently exists to the East of the subject property. A recently constructed single - story home exists to the West of the subject property, but is located on a parcel that is slightly higher in topography when compared to the subject property. f) Current grading and erosion control methods. The proposal would conform to the City's current grading and erosion control methods. The applicant is required to maintain stormwater on site where feasible and therefore this finding may be made in the affirmative. g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable. interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above. Additionally, the applicant proposes roof- mounted solar panels, consistent with the design policy handbook. This finding may be made in the affirmative. Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, application number 06 -292 for Design Review Approval is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: PERMANENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL There are no permanent conditions of approval for this project. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1.. The proposed home shall be constructed as shown on Exhibit "A" incorporated by reference. • Application No. 06 -292; 20625 Marion Avenue 2. Four sets of complete construction plans incorporating this signed Resolution and Arborist Report dated March 30, 2006 shall be included on the plans submitted to the Building Division for permit plan check review. 3. Final landscape, irrigation and utility plans shall be incorporated into the construction plan set and shall take into account the following requirements: • Landscape plan shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff, promote surface infiltration and minimize use of fertilizers and pesticides that can contribute to water pollution. • Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. • Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. • Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. • Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. • A note shall be included on the site plan stating that no construction equipment or private vehicles shall park or be stored within the dripline of any ordinance . protected trees on the site. 4. Front yard landscaping shall be installed prior to final occupancy inspection. Any changes to. the approved plans must be submitted in writing with a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. No downgrading in the exterior appearance of the approved residence will be approved by staff. Downgrades may include but are not limited to garage doors, architectural detailing, stonework, columns, shutters, driveway materials, etc. Proposed changes to the approved plans are subject to the approval of the Community Development Director and may require review by the Planning Commission. 6. The site plan shall contain a note with the following language: "Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the LLS of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per the approved plans." Application No. 06 -292; 20625 Marion Avenue 7. A storm water retention plan indicating how all storm water will be retained on -site, and incorporating the New Development and Construction — Best Management Practices, shall be submitted along with the complete construction drawings. 8. Water and/or runoff from the project site shall not be directed toward the adjacent properties. 9. All processing fees, in the form of deposit accounts on file with the community development department, shall be reconciled with a minimum $500 surplus balance at all times. In the event that the balance is less than $500, all staff work on the project shall. cease until the balance is restored to a minimum of $500. CITY ARBORIST 10. All recommendations contained in the City Arborist Report dated March 30, 2006 shall be followed. 11. Tree protective measures, as specified by the City Arborist, shall be installed and inspected by Staff prior to issuance of City Permits. 12. Prior to issuance of City Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City, in a form acceptable to the Community Development Director, security equivalent to 100% of the total aOpraised value of trees to be retained to guarantee the maintenance and preservation of trees. 13. The City Arborist shall inspect the site to verify compliance with tree protective measures. The bond shall be released after the planting of required replacement trees, a favorable site inspection by the City Arborist, and payment of any outstanding Arborist fees. GEOTECHNICAL CLEARANCE 14. The Project Geotechnical Engineer shall review and approve all geotechnical aspects of the final development plans (i.e., site preparation and grading, site drainage improvements and design parameters for building foundations, and driveways) to ensure that the plans, specifications and details accurately reflect the consultants' recommendations. The results of the plan review shall be summarized by the Project Geotechnical Engineer in a letter(s) and submitted to the City Engineer for review prior to issuance of permits. 15. The Project Geotechnical Engineer shall inspect, test (as needed), and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project construction. The inspections shall include, but not necessarily be limited to: site preparation and grading, site surface and Application No. 06 -292; 20625 Marion Avenue subsurface drainage improvements, and excavations for foundation construction prior to placement of fill, steel and concrete. The consultant shall specifically verify adequate embedment of all strip footings / "at- glance" foundations into suitable (stiff) bearing materials and deepen where appropriate The results of these inspections and the as-built conditions of the project shall be described by the geotechnical consultant in a letter(s) and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final project approval. 16. The owner (applicant) shall pay any outstanding fees associated with the City Geotechnical Consultant's review of the project prior to project Zone Clearance. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 17. Deferred Improvement Agreement (Agreement) between the City of Saratoga and Brad E. Renn recorded May 14, 1981 remains in place. In order to keep the rural character of Marion Road, the owner (applicant) is not required to construct those improvements deferred in the May 14, 1981 Agreement, at this time. When curb and gutter or other street improvements are constructed at the adjacent property to the east or on the opposite side of Marion Road, the owner (applicant) shall be required to build the required improvements per the referenced Agreement. The City will notify the owner in writing when such improvements shall be required. The owner . will be required to construct the improvements even if no application for development is on file with the City at that time. 18. An Encroachment Permit issued by the Public Works Department is required for improvements in any portion of the public right -of -way. FIRE DEPARTMENT 19. The applicant shall comply with all Fire Department (Saratoga Fire District) . conditions. CITY ATTORNEY 20. Applicant agrees to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. Section 2. Construction must commence within thirty-six (36) months or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Application No. 06 -292; 20625 Marion Avenue Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15 -90 of the Saratoga City Code, this resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission. State of California, the 14th day of March 2007 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Linda R. Rodgers Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: John F. Livingstone, AICP Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date • • Attachment 2 r� Community Development Department City of Saratoga . 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, California 95070 20625 Marion Ave Application #: 06 -292 ARBORIST REPORT March 30, 2006 APN 503 -22 -101 Prepared by Kate Bear Owner: Renn ISA Certified Arborist WE 2250A Introduction The property owner of 20625 Marion Avenue has submitted plans to demolish the existing house, carport and garage and build a new house, detached garage and swimming pool. Four trees protected by City Ordinance were inventoried for this project and may be exposed to impacts from construction. They include one Siberian elm ( #1) and three Italian stone pines ( #2 -4) on the neighbor's property. The locations of each tree are noted on the attached copy of the landscape plan and each tree has been assigned a number. Trees #24 are shown in their approximate locations, but have not been surveyed. Specific data for each tree is compiled in a table at the end of this report. Plans reviewed for this report include Sheet A -1.0, Site Plan, dated March 3, 2006 (by Noel F. Cross, architect), Sheet C -0, Topographic Plan (by Roger E. Dodge, L.S.), Sheet L -1.0, Landscape Plan, dated February 15, 2006 (by Christopher Yates Design), and Sheet Cl, Grading and Drainage, dated March 20, 2006 (by McLeod and Associates). Findings The three Italian stone pines on the adjacent property, are not shown on the topographic survey and must be surveyed and added. The drawings show a, new driveway about two feet from the fence line, within the canopy and root zone of the stone pines. I recommend making the driveway five feet narrower along the stretch next to the trees to avoid excavation within the. drip line of the. tree canopies. Per City Ordinance 15- 50.080, a bond amount of $26,200, which is equal to 100% of the total appraised value of the trees protected by ordinance, is required for this project. This total appraised value represents the combined value of trees #1 -17. Appraisal values are calculated according to the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9`h Edition; published by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), 2000. Design Requirements L. This entire report shall be incorporated into the set of final building plans and be titled Sheet T -1 (Tree Protective Measures). Additionally the Site Plan must show the location of protective fencing as identified on the attached map. 2. Trees #24 must be surveyed and shown on the drawings. 3. Trenching for irrigation, lighting, drainage or any other aspect of the project must remain outside of the trees' canopies. If irrigation lines or electrical lines for lighting are designed inside drip Page 1 of 2 20625 Marion Avenue lines of the trees' canopies, they can be placed on top of existing soil grade and covered with wood chips or.other mulch. 4. Design irrigation so that it does not spray trunks of trees. 5. Stones, mulch or other landscape features must be at least one foot from the trunks of retained trees and 6 inches from the trunks of new trees. 6. Tilling or stripping of the topsoil beneath the trees' canopies is not allowed, including for weed control. 7. Bender board or other edging material proposed beneath the trees' canopies should be established on top of existing soil grade (such as by using stakes). Tree Protection Measures 1. Tree protective fencing shall be installed as shown on the attached map and established prior to demolition or the arrival of construction materials on site. It shall be comprised of six -foot high chain link fencing mounted on eight -foot tall, two -inch diameter galvanized posts, driven 24 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. 2. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the designated fenced area (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: demolition, grading, trenching, equipment cleaning, stockpiling and dumping materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 3. Any approved grading or trenching beneath the trees' canopies shall be manually performed using shovels. 4. Any pruning of trees on site must be performed under the supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist or ISA - Certified Tree Worker and according to ISA standards. 5. The disposal of harmful products (such as chemicals, oil and gasoline) is prohibited beneath tree canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath tree canopies. Additionally, fuel shall not be stored nor shall any refueling or maintenance of equipment occur within 20 feet of the tree's trunks. 6. Herbicides shall not be applied beneath the tree canopies. Where used on site, they must be labeled for safe use near trees. Attachments: Tree Inventory Table Map Showing Tree Locations Page 2 of 2 TREE INVENTORY TABLE J Siberian elm w y � II o 0 i. W 1 Ulmus pumila 25.5 w c o Good Cd ,. 3 OR $11,100.00 P. Italian stone pine 0 N 0. N a u �+ Cd 2 Pinus pinea :� 30 v 3 3 0 �° ° �, � ° $3,600.00 Italian stone pine �cN c II r. II o �o ° o b 3 Pinus pinea 38.5 50 50 50 Good High $6,900.00 TREE Italian stone pine 1 i w II 0 U .� NO. TREE NAME] C7 .; w x U W 4 O En x 1 A o z c o a a J Total Appraised Value $26,200.00 • Replacement Tree Values 15 gallon = $150 24 inch. box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 48 inch box = $5,000 52 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 Should any tree listed above become damaged owner will be required to repair the damage. Should any tree listed above be removed owner will be required to replace that tree with trees equal in value to its assessed value. P_.� Address: March 30, 2006 20625 Marion Avenue Siberian elm 1 Ulmus pumila 25.5 35 50 50 Good High $11,100.00 Italian stone pine 2 Pinus pinea 26.5 30 50 50 Good High $3,600.00 Italian stone pine 3 Pinus pinea 38.5 50 50 50 Good High $6,900.00 Italian stone pine 1 4 Pinus pinea 30 35 50 50 Good —High 1 $4,600.00 Total Appraised Value $26,200.00 • Replacement Tree Values 15 gallon = $150 24 inch. box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 48 inch box = $5,000 52 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 Should any tree listed above become damaged owner will be required to repair the damage. Should any tree listed above be removed owner will be required to replace that tree with trees equal in value to its assessed value. P_.� Address: March 30, 2006 20625 Marion Avenue e CRnopy 15 '2 PROTECTIVE FENCING Attachment 3 • • • . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, Denise Kaspar , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the 24`h day of February , 2007, that I deposited 94 Notices in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to -wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15- 45..060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property described as: APN: 503 -22 -101 Address: 20625 MARION RD that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. Denise Kaspar Advanced Listing Services CITY OF SARATOGA Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 (408) 868 -1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Saratoga's Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on: Wednesday, the 14th day of March, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Theater located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. The public hearing agenda item is stated below. Details of this item are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. Please consult the City website at www.saratoga.ca.us regarding Friday office closures. APPLICATION /ADDRESS: DR06 -292 / 20625 Marion Avenue APPLICANT/OWNER: Cross / Renn APN: 503 -22 -101 DESCRIPTION: -The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct a new single - story single - family dwelling and detached two -car garage. The dwelling will consist of .approximately 3,818 square feet of floor area and a basement. The detached garage will be approximately 663 square feet. The height of the structure will not exceed the 26 -foot height limitation. The gross lot size is approximately 21,780 square feet and the site is located in the R- 1- 12,500 zoning district. Design Review approval by the Planning Commission is required pursuant to Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.060. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a Public Hearing in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing. In order for information to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed on or before Monday, March 5, 2007. This notice has been sent to all. owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor's office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out -of -date information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to, all residents potentially affected by a project.. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage _you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Shweta Bhatt Assistant Planner (408) 868 -1266 February 24, 2007 wnership Listing repared for: 503 -22 -101 GERALD N & PATRICIA RENN. 20625 MARION RD SARATOGA CA 95070 503 -22 -011 LAW TRUST OR CURRENT OWNER 20720 REID LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -5327 503 -22 -014 VIC & MALIKA KAUL OR CURRENT OWNER 20660 REID LN . SARATOGA CA 95070 -5324 503 -22 -017 ANTHONY YAGOBI OR CURRENT OWNER 20600 REID LN S TOGA CA 95070 -5324 5 - 2 -020 DENG -TAN FAMILY OR CURRENT OWNER 20570 REID LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -5369 503 -22 -023 MARK S & DEBORAH KIBORT OR CURRENT OWNER 20511 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5883 503 -22 -026 JERRY & MARY GRAVKIN OR CURRENT OWNER 20601 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5805 503 -22 -029 ZHANG J & YOU E OR CURRENT OWNER 20661 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5805 503 -22 -012 STEWART E & FRANCES SMITH OR CURRENT OWNER 20700 REID LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -5327 503 -22 -015 ROGER W & MARTHA SCHALLER OR CURRENT OWNER 20640 REID LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -5324 503 -22 -018 DAVID B SAXBY OR CURRENT OWNER 20590 REID LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -5369 503 -22 -021 MERVYN W & HELEN MOYLES OR CURRENT OWNER 20560 REID LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -5369 503 -22 -024 JACK M & RAMONA MAXFIELD OR CURRENT OWNER 20581 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5883 503 -22 -027 R I & LOUISE WEBB OR CURRENT OWNER 20621 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5805 503 -22 -030 RENE & VIRGINIA DELGADO OR CURRENT OWNER 20681 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5805 503 -22 -013 JOHN A CAGLIOSTRO OR CURRENT OWNER 20680 REID LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -5324 503 -22 -016 HENRY 3 & LAURELYN COLES OR CURRENT OWNER 20620 REID LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -5324 503 -22 -019 DAMIAN CIESLICKI OR CURRENT OWNER 20580 REID LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -5369 503 -22 -022 THOMAS J & MOMOYO LOWDERMILK OR CURRENT OWNER 14031 ELVIRA ST SARATOGA CA 95070 -5829 503 -22 -025 WARREN S & GLENNA HANNIBAL OR CURRENT OWNER 20591 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5883 503 -22 -028 PAUL H & LENA ROSSETTI OR CURRENT OWNER 20641 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5805 503 -22 -031 VENKATESH S & DAYA NADAMUNI OR CURRENT OWNER 20701 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5807 032 503 -22 -033 503 -22 -035 ISH C & NEELAM VIJ GAO FAMILY TRUST SUNNY YOUNG OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 20725 CANYON VIEW DR 20735 CANYON VIEW DR 20761 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5807 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5807 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5807 503 -22 -047 KISHORE MANGHNANI OR CURRENT OWNER 20760 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5808 503 -22 -050 RICHARD C & SHIRLEY ANGUS OR CURRENT OWNER-, 20700 CANYON VIEW DR . SARATOGA CA 95070 -5808 503 -22 -053 ERIC R & TRACY LEONARD OR CURRENT OWNER 20660 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5806 503 -22 -056 A K & S DEMARTINI OR CURRENT OWNER 20600 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5806 503 -22 =059 LOUELLA M SULLIVAN OR CURRENT OWNER 20570 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5876 503 -22 -062 WILLIAM D FOLEY OR CURRENT OWNER 14080 ELVIRA ST SARATOGA CA 95070 -5815 503 -22 -069 KUOJIM HUANG OR CURRENT OWNER 14091 SARATOGA SUNNYVALE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5834 503 -22 -081 JOAN LAMBERT OR CURRENT OWNER 14030 ELVIRA ST -- - SARATOGA CA 95070 -5815 503 -22 -085 ROY & VICKY LUM OR CURRENT OWNER 20661 MARION RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5817 503 -22 -048 KENNETH O & LORRAINE PERRYMAN - OR CURRENT OWNER 20740 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5808 503 -22 -051 THEODORE S & LAINE PARK OR CURRENT OWNER 20690 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5892 503 -22 -054 MANISH SINGH OR CURRENT OWNER 20640 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5806 503 -22 -057 NANCY J MC KEREGHAN OR CURRENT OWNER 20590 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5876 563 -22 -060 STEVEN P & GRACE PATAKY OR CURRENT OWNER 14091 ELVIRA ST SARATOGA CA 95070 -5833 503 -22 -063 ERNEST ATONDO OR CURRENT OWNER 14060 ELVIRA ST SARATOGA CA 95070 -5815 503 -22 -071 GARY LIN OR CURRENT OWNER 20501 MARION RD SARATOGA CA 95070 75817 503 -22 -082 ESTHER CALVANICO OR CURRENT OWNER 14063 SARATOGA SUNNYVALE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5834 503 -22 -086 TRUNG H & BICHNGA NGUYEN OR CURRENT OWNER 20673 MARION RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5817 503 -22 -049 KARL SHIEH OR CURRENT OWNER 20720 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5808 503 -22 -052 JAMES D & SANDRA SPROCH OR CURRENT OWNER 20680 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5806 503 -22 -055 MICHAEL PHAM OR CURRENT OWNER 20620 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5806 503 -22 -058 CLYDE & E WILSON OR CURRENT OWNER 20580 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5876 503 -22 -061 RONALD G & LINDA LAWSON OR CURRENT OWNER 14090 ELVIRA ST SARATOGA CA 95070 -5815 • 503 -22 -068 GEORGE & LENA VIERRA OR CURRENT OWNER 14071 SARATOGA SUNNYVALE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5834 503 -22 -075 MICHAEL J & THERESA DAHLBECK OR CURRENT OWNER 14051 SARATOGA SUNNYVALE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5834 503 -22 -084 PHILLIP H DOPPELT OR CURRENT OWNER 20659 MARION RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5817 503 -22 -087 YASHVANT J & VARSHA PATEL OR CURRENT OWNER 20685 MARION RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5817 503 -22 -090 503 -22 -091 503 -22 -092 PU -CHAU HSU JAMES W & MARY PAYNE DENNIS K & GRACE YEE OR CURRENT OWNER PO BOX 2126 OR CURRENT OWNER 20745 CANYON VIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -0126 14095 ELVIRA ST SARATOGA CA 95070 -5807 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5833 503 -22 -093 503 -22 -094 503 -22 -095 MADIHALLY J & RAMA NARASIMHA JAMES J & TREACY ELLER RAJAT & CHARU ROY OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 927 ETON WAY ELVIRA• ST 14098 ELVIRA ST SUNNYVALE CA 94087 -4927 TOGA CA 95070 -5833 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5815 503 -23 -013 503 -22 -096 503 -22 -098 503 -22 -099 SWART FAMILY TRUST TAI S WONG LAND CORNUCOPIA 15423 LONE HILL RD OR CURRENT OWNER PO BOX 173 LOS GATOS CA 95032 -2803 14111 SARATOGA SUNNYVALE RD SARATOGA CA 95071 -0173 503 -23 -014 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5834 503 -23 -017 503 -22 -100 503 -22 -102 GERALD BRAD E & ANN RENN -101 GARY L CAMPBELL OR CURRENT OWNER GERALD N & PATRICIA RENN OR CURRENT OWNER 5061 CABRILLO PT 20615 MARION RD BYRON CA 94514 -9475 20731 MARION RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5817 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5890 503 -23 -006 503 -23 -007 503 -23- 008,009 IVAN BURGOS MELVA M IRVINE DOROTHY M STAMPER 14682 STONERIDGE DR 1005 LIVE OAK DR 20562 MARION RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5745 SANTA CLARA CA 95051 -4711 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5816 503 -23 -010 503 -23- 011,012 503 -23 -013 DONALD K & MAYA BERNARDO HOWARD ALLEN JOHN R & PHYLLIS FEEMSTER OR CURRENT OWNER 20520 MARION RD 18800 TEN ACRES RD 20544 MARION RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5816 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5664 S TOGA CA 95070 -5816 503 -23 -014 503 -23 -015 503 -23 -017 NEALE FAMILY LLC &ENT MARGARET SEAGRAVES 230 MOUNT HERMON RD 204 OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR C 13371 SARATOGA AVE SCOTTS VALLEY CA 95066 -4034 SUNNYVALE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -4535 AR OGA CA 9 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5822 0-5822 503 -23 -019 503 -23 -020 503 -23 -021 GORDON A & HELEN DUNCAN CHICH -HSING & HSIAO -JEN TSAO YUAN -HAI MEI 316 NICHOLSON AVE OR CURRENT OWNER 1162 LITTLEOAK CIR LOS GATOS CA 95030 -7254 20567 BROOKWOOD LN SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3137 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5868 503 -23 -022 503 -23 -033 503 -23 -034 IAN & HELEN WHITING D & E HORN JAMES P RENALDS OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 20601 BROOKWOOD LN 20646 MARION RD 20640 MARION RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5831 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5832 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5832 503 -23 -035 503 -23 -037 503 -23 -040 SONNY C NG KURT & B VOESTER RICHARD & MARCY LOTTI OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 20650 MARION RD 14251 BURNS WAY 20636 MARION RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5832 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5804 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5832 3 -041 503 -23 -047 503 -23 -048 I SHAHBAZI HOWARD F & CATHERINE EARHART DAVID S & SANDRA WILSON OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 14231 BURNS WAY 20680 MARION RD 20678 MARION RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5804 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5832 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5832 503 -23 -054 503 -23 -055 RLJ LLC JOHN R & ROZ FAZIO OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18800 TERRACE CT 18820 TERRACE CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -5864 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5864 503 -23 -057 503 -49 -004 WILSON TRUST CHAW -CHI & JUDY YU OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18815 TERRACE CT 20625 REID LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -5864 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5326 503 -49 -029 503 -49 -030 SHELDON & DIANA ZITMAN ERIC K YEE OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 13983 LACEY AVE 20679 REID LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -5307 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5325 City of Saratoga ATTN: SHWETA BHATT 13777 Fruitvale Ave SARATOGA CA 95070 503 -23 -056 JANICE & JOEL CHAFFIN OR CURRENT OWNER 18880 TERRACE CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -5864 503 -49 -005 ZANDER Y & BARBARA COLLIER PO BOX 1576 COUPEVILLE WA 98239 -1576 503 -49 -031 KEN P & MARIE CHENG OR CURRENT OWNER 20691 REID LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -5325 • • • Attachment 4 • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form r Date: i PROJECT ADDRESS: �"'� Ate--- Applicant Name: Application Number: Staff and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Regardless of the opinion expressed below, you reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date during the actual public review and appeal periods. PLEASE SELECT ONE: My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need -to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. - My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Neighbor Name: Neighbor Address: aoGsy r�l�PiaN �D Neighbor Phone #: kb, —Zyy6 ature: Printed:. FP61 City of Saratoga Planning Department 2006. • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form Date: QC PROJECT ADDRESS:d o `'T� " ?_ Applicant Name: J- PP 2 Application Number: 04 Staff and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Regardless of the opinion expressed below, you reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date during the actual public review and appeal periods. PLEASE SELECT ONE: My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Neighbor Name: d Mz5 ���/" 1/ Neighbor Address: Neighbor Phone # / U � ;7yl 67-;clot Signature: City of Saratoga Printed: VAr"U, A4 Planning Department City_of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form . Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: O`' = 4 ANA Applicant Name: _ ! If 200h Application Number: Staff and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Regardless of the opinion expressed below, you reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date during the actual public review and appeal periods. PLEASE SELECT ONE: My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Neighbor Name: c t—o T�-t � A �-k-n eY ' Neighbor Address: Signature: Ma- rimy -, gNeighbor Phone #:Z Printed: City of Saratoga Planning Department • • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: 200 Applicant Name: Application Number. Staff and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Regardless of the opinion expressed below, you reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date during the actual public review and appeal periods. PLEASE SELECT ONE: My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scone of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Neighbor Name: 14kLc,d Flla�- Neighbor Address: Signature:. 04 // r Neighbor Phone #: Printed: NSA J '�v�L'�� i' � C•�1� �' 1 � /i�� City of Saratoga Planning Department City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form Date: PROJECT ADDRESS: Applicant Name: D� rr � Application Number: ,1 1 200 Staff and the Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your property. Regardless of the opinion expressed below, you reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date during the actual public review and appeal periods. I�my signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address. by the applicant prior to the City's public hearing on the proposed project. ❑My signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): rA Neighbor Name: �C { 12 C (f g P :�d *✓ _ C Neighbor Address: �Icy C F�N� dni i/1C—c✓ �(� SM p�-'a 4- t4 _ Neighbor Phone #: Signature: C/ /VVAArr�� ✓ ✓" City of Saratoga Printed: Planning Department • • • Attachment 5 • • • r ABBREVIATIONS a and L angle Ca at O diameter Pounds or number (e) new iiuling IL) centerline ac azDhalti< concrete ac" a oustical adJ adjustable a 99, aggregate alum aluminum aprox approximately arch architectural bd board bit- bituminous bldg building blkg blocking bm beam bot bottom cabt cabinet cb catch basin in c em ame' r c. car cast iron cig ceiling dos closet lr clear cc cased opening /clean our col column rate cnnt continuous contr contractor cntr counter cy cubic yard db) double dept department des detail df douglas fir dia diameter dim dimension dlsp disposal or dispenser do down dwr drawer dr door ds downspout dwg drawing d., douglas fir R elev elevation elec electrical rid enclosure eq equal, equivalent equiP equipment exp expansion ex, exterior III fire alarm fd floor drain find foundation fee fire extinguisher cabinet fin finish fir floor fluor fluorescent for. face of concrete for face of finish fos face of stud It foot or feet ftg footing fury furring fut future ga ga galy galvauge nized gb grab bar g.l galvanized iron 91191s glass gr grade gyp gyp'.. ho hose bibb he hollow core hdwe hardware hgt height he' hollow metal hngr hanger horiz horizontal hr hour hwd hardwood id inside diameter sr install, installation 'nsul isulation interior Jan janitor Jnt Joint jst Joist kit kitchen RENN RESIDENCE 500.00 S= %AVERAGE SLOPE _ (0.00z29)(1)(L) - x.3896 A 2_o6z5 Marion Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT CALC" SCALE: N.T,S. 464.15' 465.25' 464.45' 454.60 489.05' DETACHED GARAGE SUMMARY: L�E817 1 'FXf31 AD 4. s' NIbNEST PONT EXIST'G GRADE: 46 (98 X20'1%2 AVERAGE EXIST'& GRADE: 464.60 PROPOSED MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: 44 `1.60 HOUSE SUMMARY: LS'a5E3T�6NV91ai' &MADE: 495.60 H16HOST POINT. EXIST& GRADE: O' AVERAGE EXIST & GRADE: 494.65' FKOP05EP MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: 5 1 0.65' ABBREVIATIONS e �' s, t R 1 i 4t 4...:._ ` � 'A� t >,_,_ AREA TABULATIONS - LOT A lam laminate t south .r,'�c�.1.�Yy ,�..�e�z..xara GROSS SITE AREA - z1,780 sq, ft. = o.5oo Acres lay lavatory sc solid core .€3}L..•A+s=1R'S It Tight sched schedule malnlevel - area len h ft.) width(ft.) area If. NET SITE AREA = zo,93b sq. ft. o.481 Acres sec section Grea -- l 1- A 6.83 x 19.00 = 509.77 FLOOR AREA max maximum - service Great Room B 15.00 x 3.50 = 52.50 m< sa medicine cabinet sh shelf Allowable Floor Area = 4,050 . ft. sht sheer. Kith sh'wr shower smile specs specifications ech mechanical e memb mmbrane 1 m WI manuf manufacturer scellaneous mntd mounted 11 north c ri not In contract negl numlible no n nom n mal tits hot to scale obsc obscure o er od outside diameter off office OPP opposite pl plate pnn Partition plywd plywood P, pair Pt Point or paint ptdf pressure treated douglas fir (use ACO) rise pneumatically impacted stabilized earth q[ quarry file cad raa n dius rd ro f drain ref rekrence rah refrigeraror relnf reinforced ,,Qd required room 1. rough opening rwd redwood re rammed earth ss ACTUAL GROSS LOT SIZE = z1,78o If x station standard o.soo acres A= ACTUAL NET LOT SIZE = 20,936 If. storag o•481 acres 1= CONTOURINTERVAL = 1 FT. L - AGGREGATE contour length CONTOUR 483 75.00 LENGTHS IN 484. 2210o SCALE FEET 485 10-C, 500.00 S= %AVERAGE SLOPE _ (0.00z29)(1)(L) - x.3896 A 2_o6z5 Marion Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT CALC" SCALE: N.T,S. 464.15' 465.25' 464.45' 454.60 489.05' DETACHED GARAGE SUMMARY: L�E817 1 'FXf31 AD 4. s' NIbNEST PONT EXIST'G GRADE: 46 (98 X20'1%2 AVERAGE EXIST'& GRADE: 464.60 PROPOSED MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: 44 `1.60 HOUSE SUMMARY: LS'a5E3T�6NV91ai' &MADE: 495.60 H16HOST POINT. EXIST& GRADE: O' AVERAGE EXIST & GRADE: 494.65' FKOP05EP MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: 5 1 0.65' ABBREVIATIONS e �' s, t R 1 i 4t 4...:._ ` � 'A� t >,_,_ AREA TABULATIONS - LOT A lam laminate t south .r,'�c�.1.�Yy ,�..�e�z..xara GROSS SITE AREA - z1,780 sq, ft. = o.5oo Acres lay lavatory sc solid core .€3}L..•A+s=1R'S It Tight sched schedule malnlevel - area len h ft.) width(ft.) area If. NET SITE AREA = zo,93b sq. ft. o.481 Acres sec section Grea -- l 1- A 6.83 x 19.00 = 509.77 FLOOR AREA max maximum - service Great Room B 15.00 x 3.50 = 52.50 m< sa medicine cabinet sh shelf Allowable Floor Area = 4,050 . ft. sht sheer. Kith sh'wr shower smile specs specifications ech mechanical e memb mmbrane 1 m WI manuf manufacturer scellaneous mntd mounted 11 north c ri not In contract negl numlible no n nom n mal tits hot to scale obsc obscure o er od outside diameter off office OPP opposite pl plate pnn Partition plywd plywood P, pair Pt Point or paint ptdf pressure treated douglas fir (use ACO) rise pneumatically impacted stabilized earth q[ quarry file cad raa n dius rd ro f drain ref rekrence rah refrigeraror relnf reinforced ,,Qd required room 1. rough opening rwd redwood re rammed earth ss sv tainless steel or sanitary sewer std std station standard SCI steel stor storag d storm drain struct so structural sb'aw bale sym symmetrical t tread tel telephone er terrazzo t8g thk tong a and groove thicku toc top of curb tow top of wall w television typ typical unf unfinished uno unless noted otherwise ugnd underground in' utility "ft vertical vest vestibule (1.83)/2 x west W/ Dining Room wd water closet wood w/o without wp waterproof wsct wainstot yrs weight yd yard < it Gallery [ D 13.17 x 35.58 x 19.00 = 10.00 = 250.23 355.80 Laundry/lawdr/Stair E 35.58 x 10.75 = 382.49 Master Suite F 35.58 x 14.75 524.81 Master Oath G 14.00 x 4.00 = 56.00 / Bedroom s2 H 10.42 x 14.75 = 153.70 4 Bath #2 1 (10.42)/2 x 20.75 108.12 Foyer 1 24.50 x 10.42 = 255.29 Foyer K (1.58)/2 x 3.17 = 2.50 Foyer L (1.83)/2 x 3.67 = 3.36 Dining Room M 1.58 x 16.50 26.07 Dining Room N 1142 x 19.67 = 263.97 Office O (6.58)/2 x 13.17 43.33 Office P 14.83 x 13.17 195.31 man eye sU tota Fax (408) 559 -3628 = If Brae area length (R) width (ft.) Atta< a #age 1 2f. S z Attached Garage z 2.00 x 13.00 26.00 Detached Garage 3 22.00 x 26.00 = 572.00 Detached Gat e a 7.00 x 13.00 91.00 garage su Its MAIN FLOOR AREA 3,183.241.1 _ 1 s.f. GARAGE FLOOR AREA = 1,298.00 If. If. MAX, ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA 4,518.00 s." under max. allowable F.A.R. by J 165T s.f. basement level area en width (ft.) ar6a (s.f.) Re<Room M 25.00 x >�.e. =x.00 (E) Residence FAR Pool Bath/Mech Rm Be 14.00 x 20.25 = 283.50 Stair!Lobby /Cellar CC 22.50 x 20.25 = 455.63 Storage DO (19.00)/2 x 9.50 19.00 Storage EE 9.50 x 1.25 = 11.88 Bedroom x3 FF 14.00 x 15.25 = 213.50 Bath #3 GG 14.00 x 19.25 = 269.50 Bedroom #4 HH 18,00 x 15.25 274.50 zement eve su rota Grading and Drainage Plan by Chris Yates Design Fax (408) 593 -8675 Landscape Architect GRAND TOTAL NEW FLOOR AREA = 6,483.74 If t...._.__4AB (6 x 78) 4,518 sq. ft. 21.58 % of Lot Area Eut;2g Nf3WUJts "'`Fi-00'R AALVA (E) House Floor area = 1,334 (heated) (E) Carport = 433 sq. ft. (E) Detached Garage 1,235 sq. ft. (E) Residence FAR = 3,002 sq. ft. (includes garages) Islew_Rouse_FAR = 289 sq. Z. (N) Residence FAR 3,183 sq. ft. above grade - heated (N) Attach Garage FAR = 635 sq. ft. - 2 car (N) Det. Garage FAR 663 sq. ft. - z car plus shop Total Proposed FAR = 4,481 sq, ft. _ y (N) Basement = 2,003 sq. ft. below grade - heated RVIOUS COVERAGE Maximum Allowable x0,936 sq. ft. _ impervious Coverage x___055 55.00 % of Lot Area SHEET INDEX = 11,515 sq. ft. House Footprint = 3,183 sq. ft. Garage Footprint = 635 sq. ft. 2"d Garage Footprint Loggias, Porches = 663 = 466 sq. ft. s . ft. Light Wells = 289 sq. Z. Driveway = 3,o68 sq. ft. Pool /Spa/ Terrace = 2,061 sq. ft. Front Walks 552 sq -ft. Side Courtyard Garden = 354 sq. ft. Proposed = 11,271 sq. ft= Impervious Coverage Exterior Photos (black & white, computer - generated) Roof Plan @ 1/4" = 5 -3.0 55.00 % of Lot Area SHEET INDEX ARCHITECTURAL A -o.o Title Sheet, Vicinity Map, General Notes, Consultant License C- 018234 Directory, Sheet Index, Project Description, Max. Bldg. a. Dimemip Height Calculation, Slope Calculation, Area Tabulations, FAR 53.84 % of Calculations, and Abbreviations A -1.o Site Development Plan @ 1" =20'0 ", and Site Plan Notes A -2.o Main Floor Plan @ 1/4' = 1 =o' A -..I Basement Floor Plan @ 1/4" = 1' -o" A -2.2 Garage Floor Plan @ 1/4" =1b" A-5.0 South & West Exterior Elevations @ 1/4" - 1'ro ", and all work shall be in with the Exterior Elevation Notes A-5.1 North & East Exterior Elevations @ 1/4" = 1-o', and Age of Exterior Elevation Notes A -5.2 North & South Exterior Courtyard Elevations @ 1/4 Structures and South, West, North, & East Garage Exterior Elevations @ 1/4' = 1' -0' A-5.3 A -6.o Exterior Photos (black & white, computer - generated) Roof Plan @ 1/4" = 5 -3.0 Cross Sections A & B CIVIL ayylbna :, °, n.!9,a;e m si:ia C -o Topographic Survey by Dodge & Associates LANDSCAPE L -t,o Landscape Plan by Chris Yates Design Landscape Architect L -z.o Landscape Sections @ 1/8" - 1=o" by Chris Yates Design Required 25' -o' 10-0" 25 -11 Landscape Architect L -3.0 Grading and Drainage Plan by Chris Yates Design Fax (408) 593 -8675 Landscape Architect T -1 Arborist Report PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project The Owners propose to remove the existing single Summary story residence (approx. 1,334 If.), attached License C- 018234 carport (approx. 433 If.) and detached garage a. Dimemip Capprox. 1,235 If.). In its place, a new 3, 180 If. 53.84 % of single story home with a 2,o02 If. belowyyrade Lot Area basement Is proposed, along with a 663 s.f. single 3. Dis<rcp Imes or d - repanoes story detached two car garage structure in the between the drawings and actual rOndR,Om rear portion of the lot. A new, swimming pool, are to be expected. spa, and patio in the rear yard, and a small 4. Codes outdoor courtyard along the east side are also all work shall be in with the part of the plan. No tree removals are required or fa.farmonce ollowing codes, as well api4icsN state requested by the proposed project. Age of Main House bull[ 1957 - 49 yrs. old Existing Detached Garage built 1957 -49 yrs. old Structures Detached Barn built 1959 -47 yrs. old Main House Finnit._._- .._Side .....__.......Rear.. Setback Required 25' -o" x5' -0 " Chart ayylbna :, °, n.!9,a;e m si:ia Proposed 25=3" 15'-9 "(left) 9o=6" all manWls to le in an indexed 1o=i (right) Detached Eiont_._.___.Side...__. __ Rear._.. Garage Required 25' -o' 10-0" 25 -11 Setback Chart f Proposed 159'- o "1x'o`0eft) 15'-0" ` Architect s� m i bth all Euilding Il es` floerr levrlb, ern., end all vea all grades, conditions, Noel F. Cross, AIA di,nensiuns, and data at the site prior to start ork: errors resulting from fall" to verify License C- 018234 an P auras shall b<tn <resopnnsipi` OI :he and ea[h salt a. Dimemip 1 wedimens -s take p-d -e over do not scale these d.aw: nos. scaled drawings. Ne contractor shall nerdy i t reritett ,mmrolarcit of D'y con'Imn or General - '. dl c eN-11, noxe er coin.. 3. Dis<rcp Imes or d - repanoes any and all conditions rryuinny tvtn minor dannutlon shall be oroug" to t. artentlon between the drawings and actual rOndR,Om I or the dicF.itect immediately, a _,,run, of 1 a9 roan pno m m< 6 <y�nn,ng any are to be expected. demolluon nrrcon" mation se0ueme. 4. Codes f aom California auIlding Code (COX.) all work shall be in with the (o OOO Uniform Budding Code wi,h ,on+ State f -ifgmla Amendments). fa.farmonce ollowing codes, as well api4icsN state I Zr llfomW Electrical Code (CE.CJ C o9q NanOnal Electrical (ode wxh 1001 start coiII n & I «al ate or co r ord-m s . I % CaafornH Amendmenu). I om California pku"!4 code (<n, -) I ASID 1 r, uniform pi -A-1, code to s) State of Cali /«nia Amendments) t1m California Metlunlul Code (CM.0 i (x000 Uniform Mechanxal Code wiu,'soo+ Stmt of Caiifornia Mundmenci), s. Manufa6urefs - cralloI and ad subconpaa0rs span nstan specifications spo,r . and Protect all products. ,na rI.I,, L.L.S. #3295 ayylbna :, °, n.!9,a;e m si:ia dance w,m me manufacturer, sptcd,utions, deuft, a instructions, tymul. all manWls to le in an indexed ail „1,lnuils or inrtructlens provWed try these nu(xt rs roc the proper r,re On and Eamp,led inder format a of the above are [o be delivered do the _'r at Me r PUtion and final P.E.#35048, P.L.S. ,nspectlon of the Vrolect. CONSULTANT DIRECTORY Architect Noel F. Cross, Architect AIA Noel F. Cross, AIA 307 Orchard City Drive, Suite 107 License C- 018234 Campbell, California 95008 Address Phone (408) 871-7600 _ Fax (408) 871 -7604 General - The Conrado Company, Inc, Contractor 14363 Saratoga Ave., Suite 206 Paul R. Conrado Saratoga, California 95070 License x575965 Phone (408) 867 -2095 Zoning Fax (408) 867-2097 Interior Design & Interiors Designer 170 State Street Dawn Williams, Los Altos, California 94022 ASID Phone (650) 948 -7360 Fax (650) 948-0379 Surveyor Dodge & Associates, Surveying Roger E. Dodge, 20652 Chaparral Circle L.L.S. #3295 Penn Valley, California 95946 Phone (530) 432-5212 • Fax (530) 432 -5443 Civil Engineer Daniel G. MacLeod, I MacLeod Associates, Inc. 965 Center Street P.E.#35048, P.L.S. San Carlos, California 95129 Phone(408)S93 -8580 Fax (408) 593 -8675 Soils Engineer 1 Geoforensics, Inc, Dan Dyckman, 561 -D Pilgrim Drive P.E., G,E. #2145 Foster City, California 94404 Phone(650)349 -3369 Fax (650) 571-1878 Structural Pop. Engineer, Inc. Engineer 1 25425. Bascom Avenue, x102 John P. Popa, 1 Campbell, California 95008 R.C.E.#C- 038645 ,) Phone(408) 559-4202 Fax (408) 559 -3628 Landscape ,\ Christopher Yates Design Architect 107 Ramona Avenue Christopher Yates, 1 ' piedmont, California 94611 CA license #4833 1, Phone(510)601 -1499 ' F, (510)601-14-93 Energy Consultant 1 The Architectural Machine John Hermanmson, P.O. Box 3808 AIA Redwood City, California 94064 Phone(650)364 -8016 1 Fax (650) 368-6652 ARCH ITE�T The plans, ideas arrangements, and designs indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the property of the Architect and were created and developed solely for use on, and in connection with this specific project, and shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not originally Intended without written permission from NOEL F. CROSS, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. this symbol calls attention to a "green" material or construction process. the general contractor and all subcontractors shall give special attention to locating, procuring, and installing this specific material, or one that is as equally environmentally sustainable. in many cases vendor phone numbers have been included, all the architect in the event you cannot locate the specified material. RENN RESIDENCE Property Brad Renn Owners Ann Renn Project 20625 Marion Avenue Address Saratoga, CA 95070 -5817 Phone (4o8) 867 -3814 Parcel APN: 503 -22 -101 Site Areas: o.481 acres 20,936 sf Zoning R- 1- 12,5o0, Single Family Residential, City of Saratoga Setbacks Front: 25'-0" Rear: 2S-o " /35 "-o" Side: 10 =o "/15' -0" Construction Type V -N Occupancy R -3 P RN -ECU CT DATA Project No. 05.13-A Drawn By NFC /DSK /JMS /JTF . Checked By NFC Date 24 FEBRUARY 20o6 PLANNING SUBMITTAL Revisions 31 JANUARY zoo. 1 PLANNING DEPT. RESPONSE Sheet w O ■ O No. H �`!/ Q �T A date printed: 1f3110. —- SITE PLAN — — — ; ARCHITECT -- ... ®SCALE: 1" BLUESTONE PAVERS O/ /' \ / / Ale NO�L 1: CROSS TYPICAL ...._._..._. __. .... - -- 8 CON _RAK I .1 TYPICAL To O NGT • -7/ _ } V O }WY S OOO IO( OO W _ i f 13 9 —_ (N)LAND9CAPE V NEDG @,TYPICAL _ BLVESTON V 1 �QQ L16NT/E I LEDGER STONE 494 a a CONCRETE BLAB e O W C] i0 EXTERIOR STAIR W/ O 5 GARDEN WALLS, \ I POOL PATIO. TYPICAL 1 �Qb O W.I. GOARDRAILa HANDRAIL, \s TYPICAL :CAMPBELL CA 95008--,q,�S TYPICAL \ 1 GRAVEL PARKING W AREA N 9EATWALL,TYPICA1 OP N \ a ASPHALT PAVInG TO BE me O ED TYPIGA DOTTED, O E] N POOL �$P The plans, ideas arrangements, and designs \ t i f 1 : indicated or represented by this drawing are 483 - - } _ ... , _ _ _ . _ . _ .. o ed by, and a e the property of the Architect and were created and developed solely for use { -4;, .Y ,F`4 `(' C -� _ - on, and in Connection with this specific project, Q _ ,� ! and shat of be used, In whole or m part, for any 1�_ �O purpose or hie they were not originally 1 F In for cantles ermisslon from: NEW 0 N E -STORY NOEL F. CROSS, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. g CE / L 2 � 1 RESIDE N 1St I I _ _,' \ �2 ,•.•i' ! F.F.= 485.00 4 3 i .� e � { ,,- I �N GARAGE I � 5 end 7 •�cl - j e I )� - - - : , -., \�M is symbol calls attention to a "green" material or construction process. the �•' - - L@DGER OTONE 4 PR EOT CXIBTING general contractor and all l i ! 15 GARDEN V�ALLS. PRE TaTVGPEHGINb subcontractors shall five special TYPICAL ' HOP DASHED, atte t(on to locating, procur(ng and TMP� installing this specific material, or one I i l i that 464 is s In equal cy enm entally sus Inabl( any lase phone numbers have been Included. call the POOL architect event you cannot locate the specified material. �i t w�TT E MOTOR ro _ ___ _ ___ } Y F• r - - ;fir , \ `t. N1s_Qd O�sO.QQ �. LAWN LAWN ry LAWN LAWN LAWN �,.� n , W �} •? }`: i }: IN r � / �y I%AKN W NZ^AY SGOPWAN TYPICALVERSs HATCNEDJ. �1 Ti s 'F ,����JJJJ 48 S OOOIO OO x. •-.. '�:•_• °..ly!]ILI6NT /@BCM .. '• 'a.•v., d' 2 :g8 r "' 8- 9TONEP � W.I. VCHICLC -. "'n V O PROT @CT Iu_I rJd PERIMETER CCN WI LADDE h CONCRETE 9LABa GATES a DRIVEWAY F.P. PATCH. REPAIR EXIST& ITALIAN PERIMETER PENCES ONLY AIN, TYPICAL / STONED TYPICAL GATE a GRADE ,� sTNYA WUAY i PATIO, \ Sd AS REO'D BY NEW WORK, QWHARP HY R NT PINE TYPICAL - — •' SITE PLAN NOTES RENN RESIDENCE 9. New Swimming Pool, finaidesign of nverr —eg p f, spa, f °..wins, 1. Dri way rem a tingo sphslt driveway remnants Spa, andFUntains etcarebythe LamI— PANhi-,. at vnlfy layoutBan anal where 0—d <d. new driveway to be Property Brad Renn 6nciscap, drawings equipment Pad wheca shown, pravidewaiec dimemlominreldwJ Interlocking pavers(wl«Jsize /patter. per Owners Ann Renn for mare Into. a & electrical riub outr:e , <a cy shuf oft, net, architect B landscape land —,e wchit «r "Pecs). wi h—n -1 and spa perimeter f,n,ing /cov srequiredby arwchrcea. see sheet L-1.0 for borders /curbs asshown. rode, typical, u.n.u. mare info. m-11 Per manuf. specs wet non - expansive Project 2o625 Marion Avenue compacted Wsereck,wrrcomttpried Address Saratoga, CA 10. Ll q h[/ ESCa pe Wells light ce, gr <ssJeape we : upade pehe sonmpo by 95070 -5817 p wide 3b -high ( InJ hla,k painted wrought Inc., typical, u n.o. see exterior elevacienand gguaMrail Bladider(rswuwith w.l. es for more handrail where «an) %or escape to9rade per 2. eraem9 /cut /Flu, provide generalrocgn grading, cute, Bits, Phone (408) 867-3814 Info. xenon not 2001 c b,,,ec.310..,rypi.I..n... General Surface mpxtien, etc., and all wrface drains and 11. Setback Verification prior to `first <i Dral nag,, and Storm undergound drain ll «smenergydlsslpa[ ors prioraROrt sityi llpcentwo of f.rdai... or Dralns per sheet L -365. Chrhtop her Yates Design, Parcel APN: 503 -22 -101 )verify an yof( and per the soils report by Ceoforen sits, LL.S. of re< «d I stake— r— Inc., fythe s u.n.u. building= location, andprwidewrmen Site Areas: 0.481 acres crtlficatlon that all building se[backsamper 3. Landscaping pmvide new landscaping, h.nkcape, trees, the approved plam, typical. hedges, plantmg,'uryation, per landscape 20,936 sf ee lands�a��, plans drawings by Ch ristoDher Yates Design. 12 TeSOgraphy /eon tours all exirtiry property lines, bearings, trees. (L- sheets)f0, more info, Landscape Architect. allsuch landscaping se hettC-Oformarelof°. topography, contours ,gwdeNevatlons,utliities. typical, shall De designed andinsGlleJina,cordll— Zoning 11- 1- 12,$oo,5ingle Top�g, di.imapprepared bycDOd gese O° withu,eamorlsrs r<tommendanens, typical. Family Residential, Aisoclates, dated lone 29.2005. 4. Trees protect existing lreesshown to remain from City of Saratoga 13. Public Works Notes li Wilding nd conssuction related —wicks $ee Landscape Plan sheet damage during conamction. espec.lh, those 9 L -1.Of «new tree trees on, prentW pent,:. plwidechain shall adhere to'Ntw Dev<lopmen[and locations. tree link temporary protective fencing at the drip Construction Best Management Practices- pm[Ktien details, nedui,og CpnsirltRlOB Per the Ciry Arb «in Setbacks Front: 25' -O" s adopted by the City of Saratoga forth, arborist's report, and Report spec, City of Savtog a conditions of Rear: 25'-o "/35'-O" pu�pos,ofprevenlisg storm water polluuon, tree pr «ecti«. specs: Apaval and tree prdtecilon specs /devils. Side: t0'-O "/15=0" pP Ide new erosion control measures during contractor to remwetrees only shown. no nstruction per city of Saratoga Engineering ordinance sire tree shall be remmvedwithouta requirements B as not,d On site plan, tree removal permit from the City of Saratoga, . typical, u.n.P. typi,at u.n.p. Construction Type V -N 14. Automatic Fire TM General COntrzct 1,11 employ the servicas S. Fames 1 a. existing fences to remain: Sprinklers ofa d.lgn/build fire protection system p. coexisting perimeter f—I where shown to Occupancy R -3 ntnaor to instill a full building sprinkler main, typical, u.n 0. Fire sprinkler system. Drawings we to includes, Isprinkler ; D. new fences and ga ter: �j' system must be head,,nxrs, valves, consols. aiumt.<tc.. as Insvllnew per imeter fences,gardenwalh. P�ROJE" DATA ted to the required per Saratoga Fire Marshal and installed ilasterle hedges, pod ten<InX /covers and City of Saratoga prNfpAStandard s13 D, 2010 Edit ion. All hide gates whendch, n. ,Land -w plans Early Warning rkihalibedonein strictronformancerolocal and details for more info., typical, u. n.o. Alarm System codes and shall be cotrdinated with the local fire (EWAS). marshai as necessary. hm protection sub- d. utilities a. electrical /phone /cable: o tractor is resp°nsiblefa preps n n. . eta 400 arrPmeterimaln panel atlocau°n Project No. 05.13 -A submhtal, andapprwai of desig- bmIdandany —Id* new :sawn on plan with undergr and feeds for all crgiixeiing drawings as requ,r<d by the Saratoga a der, — dBelch for utilities la trench per P.G. &E. specs. stub our Bulldmgand Fir<o<wremenca for iszuanceM l —ical /phone /cable tx• °"dole f «exerior landscaP < &reatw < :i9hung Drawn By NFC /DSK /JM5 /)TF permit, typical. feeds m rnnduit where rcui[s, vehkle gmeutdities. :Psi". systems, shown, and as required tc. per landscape architect's drawings. se 15. St— Garde. Wall, 36 'highga,dmanecourryardwallswhe,e byCityof Saratoga B elecn ita Vmech ankalIlan%Blandsczpepiansfor Checked By NFC zhgwn. ux Eldorado S[°negJ «equiv. adh<reE p.e,BE. 1 e info., typical, u.n.o. stone veneer o;c rncrete blork, rte details an b, rdomesti<water: Landscape Architect's dwwings, typical, u.n.o. owns to pay all I esistingwater me-to remain whereshown. enymeanngane pmvide n<w2'd*.,n"d<rgZb",dcopper Date 24 FEBRUARY zoo6 1e. steelArcor /rreuls co�remrieatreuiswnercdtownatcecre ,<. see o neitl°nteesaz If ri- i,watermamheed(w,rmueplaui< PLANNINGSUSMITTAL landscape drawings for more details and required by new Protective jacket) vserve both domestic and information. typical. u.no. of utomatic Fire sprinkdec system. I nags mat gas: 17. Address Numbers upraved adEr<ss tubes shall be aired on the 9 <terto bel «aced as shown. replace buildings dt.e,hidegatepnascer m—ha (a) underground gas line as required to mice R2VISi0n5 per sec. 502.2001 lb, posltlOn as D pkIrlyvlSibleandlegit, from dstruttures M<, tie zuee[or road tno,[mq me property, ryPkai, Propose per, per P.esE. zp «z. 31 JANUARY 2007 and by me oty or Saratoga, cypl<aL u,n.a PLANNING DEPT. —, f5. «atrnnef<xhnrg, <werbne,and Is, 11 t RESPONSE is a ripe 4'dla. tosery e R IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS SEE d eu tmnLSreq°kedby <lryerSaratogY�a LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET L -1 , wen Valley Sa N-s a not Contractor • connection ub[ain me necessary L connection Permits. 7. Stone /Gravel see landscape plan sheet L -1 far more i�do., paths, P.O." ', typical, u.n.o. walks Sheet "Prior to foundation inspection y the B. Stone /concrete :1 bluestonepaws (color /sizeJpaitCmper landscape No. City,the RCE or LLS of record shall provide Patios,POrches,d a hrttttspes)ormortarbedWDmn,reeslab 1 ■ O / Terraces as shown. install slabw ..bars see laiWscape.plan she., waRw <r 6'non— passive <omPacted baser «k, a written certification that all building or=oondatbnnoe, ompIr drem.redInt., y p <,tn< eB, setbacks are per the approved tans. 'arm °r`I ^f° p« by `<eraremnxt.ln,.,typiwl,can. °. Of date printed: 1/31/07 u I ; — - 1 I 4p_ GGlgt Ii I 1 I I II I i' I I -- I ' II 0 MAIN FLOOR PLAN 98'_9• G M T6 s C9a'INT6 0 CBMNT6 o C9 oN9T8 e I I 1 1 I BENCH I DAY 91 K I:�M II II II I 1 II II II I� I �I II II II I� I I I 11 VAUd1.0 CEILING I I 1 I VAULTED CEILING I I GREp'1• RQ�OM� 1 I 1 I I N — — r3� II II II I� 1 I I II II II 11 1 �I II II II I I II II II II I I 1 1 I I I' RM. � REPRI6. - -Il-- -- 6TERE0 T.V. ARCH, D ARCNG ,ly"...... G.O. 6 G.O. f O° FLT CW ° 13 I TYPE X. CEILING a GA�za- `` I I i I I I , I I 1 GALLERY Xw I 0°PLT. CLG. ^° 'I' .I 1 GALLERY G tJRT-Y I __ � II• - FR3 -Y'1D PCR�F 0 60f �iJLLLrLfi.N - - - - - - - - _ FLT CL. . - - - - - - - - - PANTRY wort. 9KYLIGH�1 PADWff__ I I WELL / I 1 1 L --- -J I— — I' I I NDI&G II. -� XDR6. i I ___ _ � �I � TEMP• I I II 1 I I I I I 1* A I I N Al yo° DoP I I - - - - - - - - - -I FLAT CEILING _Y 2 X8 -------- - - - - -1 IDR MM.GoSSEETT I I I I I � 1 'r s C-W 1 _ MASTER BDROOM ° ... � BEDR- mpta & I I I I I i i- I ..PLZro� mGl I. II I -I -I I MT G - +. -FMB r.:, LIGHT WELL TILES e 'pPr H� 0 .A GEILINb I ONRBWSFCR`G ARCHITECT The plans, ideas arrangements, and designs indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the property of the Architect and were created and developed solely for use on, and in connection with this specific protect, and shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not originally intended without written permission from: NOEL F. CROSS, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. this symbol calls attention to a "green" material or construction process. the general contractor and all subcontractors shalt give special attention to locating, procuring, and installing this specific material, or one that Is as equally environmentally sustainable, in many cases vendor phone numbers have been Included. call the architect in the event you cannot locate the specified material. RENN RESIDENCE Property Brad Renn Owners Ann Renn Project 20625 Marion Avenue Address Saratoga, CA 95070-5817 Phone (408) 867 -3814 Parcel APN: 503-22-101 Site Areas: 0.481 acres 20,936 sf Zoning R- 1-12,500, Single Family Residential, City of Saratoga Setbacks Front: 25=0° Rear: 25� O"/35'-O" Side: 10'-0 "/15'-0" Construction Type V -N Occupancy R-3 PROJECT DATA Project No. 05-13 -A Drawn By NFC /DSK /JMS /JTF Checked By NFC Date 24 FEBRUARY 2006 PLANNING SUBMfITAL Revisions 31 JANUARY 2007 i PLANNING DEPT. RESPONSE Sheet /� �.O No. `{�` 1 1 Of _ _ date printed: 1/31/07 � - I— — I' I I NDI&G II. -� XDR6. i I ___ _ � �I � TEMP• I I II 1 I I I I I 1* A I I N Al yo° DoP I I - - - - - - - - - -I FLAT CEILING _Y 2 X8 -------- - - - - -1 IDR MM.GoSSEETT I I I I I � 1 'r s C-W 1 _ MASTER BDROOM ° ... � BEDR- mpta & I I I I I i i- I ..PLZro� mGl I. II I -I -I I MT G - +. -FMB r.:, LIGHT WELL TILES e 'pPr H� 0 .A GEILINb I ONRBWSFCR`G ARCHITECT The plans, ideas arrangements, and designs indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the property of the Architect and were created and developed solely for use on, and in connection with this specific protect, and shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not originally intended without written permission from: NOEL F. CROSS, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. this symbol calls attention to a "green" material or construction process. the general contractor and all subcontractors shalt give special attention to locating, procuring, and installing this specific material, or one that Is as equally environmentally sustainable, in many cases vendor phone numbers have been Included. call the architect in the event you cannot locate the specified material. RENN RESIDENCE Property Brad Renn Owners Ann Renn Project 20625 Marion Avenue Address Saratoga, CA 95070-5817 Phone (408) 867 -3814 Parcel APN: 503-22-101 Site Areas: 0.481 acres 20,936 sf Zoning R- 1-12,500, Single Family Residential, City of Saratoga Setbacks Front: 25=0° Rear: 25� O"/35'-O" Side: 10'-0 "/15'-0" Construction Type V -N Occupancy R-3 PROJECT DATA Project No. 05-13 -A Drawn By NFC /DSK /JMS /JTF Checked By NFC Date 24 FEBRUARY 2006 PLANNING SUBMfITAL Revisions 31 JANUARY 2007 i PLANNING DEPT. RESPONSE Sheet /� �.O No. `{�` 1 1 Of _ _ date printed: 1/31/07 LIGHT WELL TILES e 'pPr H� 0 .A GEILINb I ONRBWSFCR`G ARCHITECT The plans, ideas arrangements, and designs indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the property of the Architect and were created and developed solely for use on, and in connection with this specific protect, and shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not originally intended without written permission from: NOEL F. CROSS, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. this symbol calls attention to a "green" material or construction process. the general contractor and all subcontractors shalt give special attention to locating, procuring, and installing this specific material, or one that Is as equally environmentally sustainable, in many cases vendor phone numbers have been Included. call the architect in the event you cannot locate the specified material. RENN RESIDENCE Property Brad Renn Owners Ann Renn Project 20625 Marion Avenue Address Saratoga, CA 95070-5817 Phone (408) 867 -3814 Parcel APN: 503-22-101 Site Areas: 0.481 acres 20,936 sf Zoning R- 1-12,500, Single Family Residential, City of Saratoga Setbacks Front: 25=0° Rear: 25� O"/35'-O" Side: 10'-0 "/15'-0" Construction Type V -N Occupancy R-3 PROJECT DATA Project No. 05-13 -A Drawn By NFC /DSK /JMS /JTF Checked By NFC Date 24 FEBRUARY 2006 PLANNING SUBMfITAL Revisions 31 JANUARY 2007 i PLANNING DEPT. RESPONSE Sheet /� �.O No. `{�` 1 1 Of _ _ date printed: 1/31/07 Sheet /� �.O No. `{�` 1 1 Of _ _ date printed: 1/31/07 LEGEND ae• -a• t r -to• to -o• Owners NEW WALL(2X4 STUDSe 16' Project TYPICAL. V.N.O. — EXPOSED BEAM ABOVE — — — — -- — TYPICAL. U.N.O. 8 A PDA SIZE(KIPTH/HEIGHT) WINDOW TYPE 5�a� GBMNT APN: 503-12-101 D O DOOR DSGNATION,TVF. VNO. DOOR PE (OPTIONAL) ^ 7 ` INTERIOR ELEVATION 1 4 2 OR < -> DESIGNATION TYPICAL V.N.O, g `3/ V 9EE9NEETA- BNEARWALLOESI6NATIONSEE (I) � / MORE WALL SCHEDULE POR INFO. TYPICAL V.N.O. MM HOEDOWN LOCATION SEE HOEDOWN LEGEND Ft3R MORE W /HTT22 INFO. TYPIGAL,U.N.O. 10' 1 ®BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1' -o" Eel ARCHITECT The plans, ideas arrangements, and designs indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the property the Architect and were created and developed solely for use on, and in connection with this specific project, and shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not originally intended without written permission from: NOEL F. CROSS, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. this symbol calls attention to a "green" material or construction process. the general contractor and ail subcontractors shall give special attention to locating, procuring, and installing this specific material, or one that is as equally environmentally sustainable. in many cases vendor phone numbers have been Included. call the architect in the event you cannot locate the specified material. RENN RESIDENCE ae• -a• t r -to• to -o• Owners Ann Renn Project io625 Marion Avenue Address Saratoga, CA 95070-5817 8 (4o8) 867 -3814 Parcel APN: 503-12-101 Site Areas: 0.481 acres 20,936 sf Zoning R- 1- 12,500, Single Family Residential, City of Saratoga Setbacks Front: 25 =o" up Side: 10- o " /15=o" Construction Type V -N Occupancy • a 3•X4• G9MNT PROJECT DATA Project No. 05.13 -A Drawn By NFC/DSK/JMS /JTF Checked By NFC Date 24 FEBRUARY 20o6 PLANNING SUBMITTAL Revisions 9MNT• —NOR° ?� PLANNING DEPT. RESPONSE f R _a. ROOM --- FCaalaRa— ,j ti ;j. r. — I ARCH'D G.O. , WINE GELLAR ap GEILIN6 LEILIN6 POOL LOBBY EBATH 2°X8° •TEMP• • EMW �;� ` t-� - -Y% LINEN - r STAIR HALL STORAGE . ": ? M H. OM R ='Xa° \ uP FAU t x � � e vR Q GEILIN6 couNb BEDROOM �4 i r - r -1 SEVRO�O�M #3 o JL _ y, 4 - 110 XB° FLAT LEILIN6 3•X8 R BATH ttS DR S OB°MHDA. B °Npe CSMNTe u=i — - - -_k 6oH TO FI XED O a °N Q �, I6NT /E A W LL�aL• � LINEN nW°m; SHT /E AP P,r J ^.. ?! ,r} :• ."... N,T .?,. - 2;, > .C� . , �. 1st B p• 1 T' -b• 14'- • t 4'-O' Eel ARCHITECT The plans, ideas arrangements, and designs indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the property the Architect and were created and developed solely for use on, and in connection with this specific project, and shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not originally intended without written permission from: NOEL F. CROSS, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. this symbol calls attention to a "green" material or construction process. the general contractor and ail subcontractors shall give special attention to locating, procuring, and installing this specific material, or one that is as equally environmentally sustainable. in many cases vendor phone numbers have been Included. call the architect in the event you cannot locate the specified material. RENN RESIDENCE Property Brad Renn Owners Ann Renn Project io625 Marion Avenue Address Saratoga, CA 95070-5817 Phone (4o8) 867 -3814 Parcel APN: 503-12-101 Site Areas: 0.481 acres 20,936 sf Zoning R- 1- 12,500, Single Family Residential, City of Saratoga Setbacks Front: 25 =o" Rear: 25'-0"/35'-0' Side: 10- o " /15=o" Construction Type V -N Occupancy R -3 PROJECT DATA Project No. 05.13 -A Drawn By NFC/DSK/JMS /JTF Checked By NFC Date 24 FEBRUARY 20o6 PLANNING SUBMITTAL Revisions 31 JANUARY .1007 Q PLANNING DEPT. RESPONSE Sheet No. Of date printed: 1/29/07 i ®MAIN FLOOR PLAN I SCALE: i /4" = 1'-0" ?auuT 26X9" I CSMNT9 LEGEND Property Brad Renn NEW WALL(2X45TUD50 16' Ann Renn 0.0. 1 TYPICAL, V.N.O. — eXP05ED BEAM ABOVE — — TYPICAL.V.H.o. .,..,.: WINDoW 51ZErWIDTH /HEI6HT) _ -_... ___.. ....._ 1�5� - -- GSMNT WINDOW TYPES �!^ ';7��,...•..., :�:;- :�..:: DOOR DE916NATION, u.N.O. o 51ze E (OPTIONAL) DOOR oo R TYPALI o.481 acres 1 \ 1 4 2 OR < ¢> 8 v INTERIOR ELEVATION DESIGNATION TYPICAL U. H.o. SEE SHEET A- R- 1- 12,500, Single SHEARWALL DE516NATON,SEE SNEARWALI, SCHEDULE POR HORE (1) INFO. TYPICAL U.N.O. City of Saratoga HOLDOWN LOCATION,SEE , HOLDOWN LEGEND POR MORE rV2Q.f -PQ3L INFO. TYPICAL. U.N.O. ARCHITECT The plans, ideas arrangements, and designs indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the Property of the Architect and were created and developed solely for use on, and in connection with this specific project, and shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not originally intended without written permission from: NOEL F. CROSS, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. this symbol calls attention to a 'green' material or construction process: the general contractor and all subcontractors shall give special attention to locating, procuring, and installing this specific material, or one that is as equally environmentally sustainable. in many cases vendor phone numbers have been included. call the architect in the event you cannot locate the specified material. XENN -ff RESIDENCE Property Brad Renn Owners Ann Renn Project 2o625 Marion Avenue Address Saratoga, CA 9So7o -5817 Phone (408) 867 -3814 Parcel APN: 503-22 -101 Site Areas: o.481 acres 20,936 sf Zoning R- 1- 12,500, Single Family Residential, City of Saratoga Setbacks Front: 25'-o" Rear: 25=0"/35'-()" Side: 1o' -o "/15'-0" Construction Type V -N Occupancy R -3 PROJECT DATA Project No. 05.13 -A Drawn By NFC /DSK/JMS /1TF Checked By NFC Date 24 FEBRUARY 2oo6 PLANNING SUBMI-ITAL Revisions 31 JANUARY 2007 �� PLANNING DEPT. RESPONSE Sheet /fr � ` 2 No. ,/fie Of date printed: 1/29/07 • 0 • SOUTH ELEVATION / EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES ARCHITECT SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-o" ( [. 0.00nny System Eok'P tstlque Plus' or Celotea \ ,eenual n• ao rear as,a A opM1a:v AI[trnate roof: fibetyl r mDOai[:nt roo6nys mem,q 30a Fire freey felt under- InYmen[, o /1R'extt,Iw9rWe Pot1aHM1 LvminO,[dD OSO Structural I fNt " _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _2—"tom- 34X,ZIEIG aJ1 _� 510_65_ _ _ _ _ _ _ txtdsl,ean,ingnr tq'nv.(stauw]roil race VELUXB down). rypini, u.n.o. ll TYPICAL 2. Gutters and Downspouts a. gutters I i �E I. MEAPER" (1 � 1 d - (9MOWNPO TYPICAL 1 j - I:. 1�it i rr� r T,9 WROU&N - - t 1 i &UAR 41 I ! GATE o LIGHT +!- J T - wELL. TYPICAL (�- 1' jj 77 1q. GuaMralis 0998 ublkcTb -B(p) ulse< 1001 <bc. see details, typlol, u.na. 20. Light /ES[ape W<II 21. Dhotn- Valtai< Solar ®vManel synem �aaRIIRI�� ele[tncal Pu n e Iro'v info.. rypkel, paintM wropM1[ Iron railings Mth IR'sq. pi<keu y 4' or., w /cabs lag M4H to porch damns B rc[almrN walw as rpuvM, typcal, u.n.o. quardraN towims[antl 30106. percrMagl feet Iwdlnq epp�iM M1bwrhontelly at kueingtw ell ra�l ompomnl,, [Yoko su.n n. M hi9hwmugM T,-9.- 1l(P111 °ewe Blaaxrla rka ro rwe �.iooi ) P 9 K CDC, x<. 310.°, tmkal, u.n.o. tpiul roof mounted solar panels alai paints m bw<k alu Wwm sNM on 'ntalkr [so run wiring 1MWi5h rml j�irksptane1 temDlner Boxes fixated In Hot. ❑ STONE VwusiPn ����33��pp�� li CHIMNEY W/ SPAR ARRESTOR la. 11 -11NOn Vents plwd; 6'x "rimm<r(q.1.urcenM VentryappD see cave detnis (ermine mMerflow area- ,,100.5). l,naa - Ise 6'0' IIx n minimum of t l pt1{ torn vents a[eenm<:er -act ra,erim 2o625 Marion Avenue total s.l vents - >.33s f. 2001 ,b,fm enact iwatlans), per sec 1300.]. 1001 cb<, typral, a.n.u. 1]. Fw,placeand Chimnry a,exterlor flrepla<t a.109gqa 1a (408)867 -3814 v se EI Oorado Srone, w [sow qaz lireo xe UHeat CIO, O,ko[a {] m del. .L. a 12], rypkal, Bull C,r OIanN. specs. confirm exit lWdel a and re / bdme wq, type.l. — .. —11 crctl Site Areas: puiv. per cake r>.<. bwe, rypkal. an <er sxlnq Draisellimn[ane slab hearty per awrcr's aDxs., w!cnt[rone Is. Por<hts D Stoo Ps 11,­ 1/4' M, fool [o drNn II, for mare nf., typical. all stoep t,dl onfwm [o sec. 1003.3.1.] 11, 1 be w ma ste 11 at a0 dmn r<H un. 1. uu rM I,1 �lues[we pacers, amwr p,[krn, x[ in,' mortar beg war poured . wpi.t(min) reinf. cencre[e stab par<M1n. ryPiral, u.n.o. '< <�'���.. Property Brad Renn see cave detnis (ermine r ze ogee qv r, ymu. /.� .-.� 2o625 Marion Avenue Address mlo.,tvyKal,uno. 3 dw.rWnJ bonder tad meta downspouts n \ Phone (408)867 -3814 site gait for stAUe Jralugc,tmual, Idw,ns^wulo4'd -a untlw 9a'unE 1 d,iiper. Site Areas: I N69YSTEN GLE u ^o9A oener9y u Ipm,ee by so la «pmt R- 1- 12,5oo, Single Roo IF Family Residential, City of Saratoga Setbacks Front: 25'-o' Rear: 25'-o/35 o" s` � -'� Construction Type V -N g skits Wgl. f' k! a f 1 bweall roolwwall openvgs Der pia'- >,z1T� s'- S -�� � s Wp1 W BI tt�M1 b p°IumbingOventsc, ryP4al,u n.a. - r - n"erev<kf sre Iow°m"bl!,e- [�oor°erwalllNamrtef ,0 _�i }' rypCal, u.n u. wrm ^9tprrt.< s�d(b)2001c .aria. P roc - '. t is Tt _Lo0�4�T�e - 500.42• _ i -s 6}rl -EERY 4 VeM<eaDOOrsigt y d t -[a[y 91Dty1 lr Een. -•F .� II [ 1, a-' METAL'O&EE' .d S. flasMnq y�laflemn yob va0eyr, 26 9 9 jy 4'• - tsa &UTTER. TYPICAL6 ga 9.1nM. decal b m9 .0 b pfl ihing0 rake wall , `.� S r .y �� r te'' ss ., r_ u m._- _ vO. PLATC _ 4446.OB Info., tYP al, .n-o ' 9 "g P� p eaapceh. M 2r[o6 o n mD«u�,ualk e Lr s �d r caWt rDriLee �t-1 _ _ .s�...��c,_ r` OFFICE 45.08• a lc h £1 ('r :.' - ` � -�> _ •: — O.PLATEO M DININ&ROO _ f' lifeNlass p n 10 qv 9vv' L "flxM1l,y Ynb wallmph<hed d I kpw flashlnq In 4+k. TSr -L_ ii 'S I - a 9ruc`Go VVIN.. ld TYPICAL 058 Surdl98oari lsM1eaNin9, ovx la4aae r_ b 8 HCAD WOOD f ^x•. rv--�� ' I I .IM60P FRAME WINDOW 191LL, - 9d TYPICAL 20 d w(d h d fl hmg D 9.. i n h' 9above INOwsBd<ws. I I � R O tv "tini s'/ METAL POWNSPOUT 1b TOUNDER &ROUND d Callfgrma raminq plan. d fl gplan tw shaCea rca,nndua C 1'f h rg. 2x,2 ..... .. TI6 MT DRAIN, TYPICAL wmf W, ewr roM .... s_ 1 K:. .. ,.- 'nb.trol alxCU�n omisgD BdeUlslw mwe _ W • /._ }s"�•-`• D VL�NT. �'. V�tiT. ]. 488.00' Exterlor Sidinga Trim ellsN IN SYirema xe instalM wtt 3,,1 iNral-BOartl hu.vrga w2Hry0d,f. V T 7 _T0.9UBFLQORG MAIN PLOOR studsy tG'o.. ryp1 I a. a e i�rd y -,.1. g. prowae> n 3 •o witrawNea AVERAGE �XI9T'G GRADE:.484.6�' I I — J ieowd<atuao xturc samples for n<nite<t' +and tka[h'Ofdw Id "Alper urerts (p.WiaumplesfwaJprmanw ea `wrap T IRON WROU0 rOuRT - GATE OGOVRTYARD s pproval pto ybasa per 1001 cbc,sx. 2506.5, aver 13. Gable End Attic exmnw stucco ontone finish into all Vents Ixads.antl)embs. one pmviay'insuil ax. `Q O< llnalllnlsh at, w're wth, o/31a 1 abrdie. yMd111W mgpa -1 Ii riky b,,11 le app[M alit grade redwood sills a['. M,u venumlut dt.s. 16A4GN L FOUNDATION finical, u.n.o. w tp'mH b. u— win rI wup[rtenw,tuao0nisa into all w:mlewB enrydlmen,ions gaEleend «srlgvhr vents w! t2'x14•prcfeb. paintetl St. me Ikuverc0 VENT W,' 'WINDOW sx!coils. [mi<al, u.n.o. door ne +dy+nd iamb; wrapexer. stucco arcM1lix[Orlor to ordering. en[.w /g.L S<r <enM vend ylnsltle rugB fa (WHERE OCCURS), TYPICAL provide sample of finish Into all wlMOw Baom nets, and j—I. wwidelwm window sllli mawf. by Carson gaDwenA mountN exhaust ns(l sans rota7. 'u NUtone, model aGF1300exn+un fanw 10. Exterior French DO015 kOtbe Window [0.. or while Carsons toat(n99i Coatinn s, weeuiv. [yokel. u.n.o. puiv. wj Wtamat4[M1<masNt tm,u.n.a. b.'latst'gable•'nd v<nuytuy <iy s. puiv. aluminum clad wood Name at aliswinging OdtIa 15100 fill tor. approval to field. <n er I. —;-d Held ledge cane veerM lm'G14 Prvfay. ^nM prcfab.WmtId 9.I «hrto sow xM1MUle (w h hdoors waN>/p'[olfd., lmulatee e Ilauvered yr ,rmkal,un e- mo. typical. diNded lltes, Ipsar Wrs,aM tempered !aril nlaxelow< 91aas. provide wain gradeaHn El Derado Stone. (LC.00.eER- 3509.8 NER- ap3uor equal., o/wire latnaM S<mNh ve ty act stun type /:olor o co, '3wy<n, s♦kullding paper 14. 0.109�Venta Cor -A -Vent model no. VaW ridge vents at Rn sM1 at,n,eNw,tmiul.un.o. calm lTvrxrL enO insnn stone p /TYVek ®rbuibllp wrap, npkal, u.n.p. plan Beexd,. al vdanaa.Nb„9ruger where mown u.n.o. n N., v.n.o. 11. [mks, ya Sk fl9h[sand Well. ik liyhts 'v venter xrmmvr. sox°. rypma amtn9 lux QCaDa ESEn- eo>s)fwm moamea 15. Barg<Rafter9Faseia a. bar�g <ntter assembly Frhac[or to'rcrity all braze,nodixd aLminum 0adwood hamt Trim rontin us q.l. drip +dqe flashing,W ,xl Clear Yyllght suesaM rougah skylght �,fomfort RUS'dual zemperetl 8. Exterlor painting surface pn,p a'I- ahwaugnly ckka a[er vr,ur(aces ofIrdwt, Lamy prrprimetl shingle strip 83x6 Clear -ngs,a Dory [M1e glaainqq. w /FOVMM n»hin9per [he ittctMaMdiacreDandes manuf. spew u.n.0 apply ali PI., and suin dust, 9rea <. p,w to Plntinq/s[a:nhw. umbrrto br pa<Illc Lem�ge -pnmeA parge loner, per rake WOed Laminates, Inc, dnalls, typical, u.no. ryplcal. prbrtc placingfinal Ayliy� ht b. well and epenlny nOMSSUi<[ly per menulacturN's spas, tnorouyyhlY°�aulk, syyxkle.hli.aMunA smooth all<rxkt, splits, hdes. NC. off —artaz ® CLEA 0 kiln dried fascia order. sae wintlow uM1eOUle ; mwa116mldo/double l +iramirg all [mkaL v.n.o. yrMr to palming, gpkal,u.n p. IlagaFa�atla as<iyvim. sce safari. <wkin .,kiln -Orkd LOClear LambD prt. typical, u.no. primed fasna hoard,seedeui4 lwm info., Mr moreinlo. tYprcal. u.no. Mroof6cxling aYning,. sndnalls, typcal, u.n.o. bxk- pfi—dl lamas, bage D. terfor stucco siding: prwideone coat primer, [w0 Coat, Xa[lat<x a[ typical, Il.n.o' 11. Attic Exhaust vents use O'Ha In COm q posltlon Shingle V<nt i__.nd trim priarb aOaDOn. <o1Z11 c.p exlxior wood trim: (11' wide, lT�orH eM 2' nigh wi[M1 60.32 p. ee) fmoun[eJ Vent+wM1er< pro✓Ide wx coat prima, two roots semi .glens palm at Dli eaves, mim,gmtm AAwmrpwn, an9r,imiul. v,. e. cape eWma. ee<. a. yanq<eoor: _ WEST ELEVATIONrw,der oto "eem,.man parent mNna ales Dy Cabot, ar equiv., ryplul, u. n.o.ne 9. Ncw W Indows , ypical clad wood windows SCALE'1 = 1' -0" • /4r Ibe Window [0., cr pair. while lad frame dual efrrw wiMOw xlxduk Ica more ialo.. tmkai- Cjum,num woM glate0,ow q.'assataLL<asesnentandlireAw•in 1",1itn colodal simuwled divi0ed rites d spacer bars. pmvid<suin grade akx finimxima:n, ^ typical u.n. u. b, Aber r Ias windowsx:howera / \ Miega eik'mdow ea., areww. p.wtame fib 91as Ira wilalow. whit 26' -O "MAX. HEIGHT 61 0.65'_ _ _ _ ,fnlwa[<a e- yiet -f ykal. a,,.o. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / 12 al"IEXNTEG VENDT, 16 ALI&N FOUNDATION VENT W /�r WINDOW (WHERE 00"M 1,TYPIGAL The plans, ideas arrangements, and designs indicated or represented by this. drawing are owned by, and are the property. of the Architect and were created and developed solely for use on, and in connection with this specific project, and shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not originally intended without written permission from: NOEL F. CROSS, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. A® this symbol calls attention to a "green' material or construction process. the general contractor and all subcontractors shall give special attention to locating, procuring, and installing this specific material, or one that is as equally environmentally sustainable. in many cases vendor phone numbers have been included. call the architect in the event you cannot locate the specified material. RENN RESIDENCE Property Brad Renn Owners Ann Renn Project 2o625 Marion Avenue Address Saratoga; CA 95070 -5817 Phone (408)867 -3814 Parcel APN: 503-22-101 Site Areas: 0.481 acres 20,936 sf Zoning R- 1- 12,5oo, Single Family Residential, City of Saratoga Setbacks Front: 25'-o' Rear: 25'-o/35 o" Side: Construction Type V -N Occupancy R -3 PROJECT DATA Project No. 05.13-A Drawn By NFC /DSIC/1MS /JTF Checked By NFC Date 24 FEBRUARY zo06 PLANNING SUBMITTAL Revisions 31 JANUARY 2007 t PLANNING.DEPT, RESPONSE Sheet No. /� 5 . O ,(�` Of date printed: 1/31/07 • • • 1p. GuarAralls oxi9n fh,ll conlarm to sop. a kNe 1e -a(p) o-r 2001 cbc. see detau,. rypi<a. .o 20. L19hVE .,e Well ®21. Phato-ValtaleS.- .IIRrBLweBa P "nil System . . Nxtrkalplu tiro m Info., tYPkal, STONE VENEER SIDINb O i� CNIMNEY WTB b ARRESTOR NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4 "= 1•-0" 25_•0 -MAX. NEIbHT 510_85' _ � ,� _ _ _ N6R MAN 4� Y i : 3 EXTERIORSTONO SEL9 - 1 / I' �C V'NEER, TYPICAL r I E Ir r iI. r I 19 WROUGHT IRON O UARDRAIL 4 3D P k );. }.Lq •Y I� I 1 F S OGHT. I I%ESGAP' ALL- TYPICAL "h Poo9 z :..Lx •, 's ad. a .. . >: .. . .: , ''s q. q;. .: :. '.� `: : . -ii. .3 a r. -� -- M�ADI $MOU9C ° -� - - - - - AV�RA6�EXTTIN66R.TD�: 4a�.61!' METAL DOWNSPOUT .. 2b TOUHDERSKOUND TIGHT DRAIN. TYPICAL yain[M wrought iron rmkn9s; picken @ 4' wc., w/ Ubs 4g bolted to potth <aumns a rekm,n9 walls s rcgwrea troiu:. u.no. 9wMran towmn,una m IDS. per lineal fmt IwPmy pp,its Mntontall at 99 o Yrall entslbs .h. Iwding lurSUllraiDcornpon ,[vpk+ Y l,<u.n.u. J6' hign wmugh[ iron guartlraii (px note a 1p abovel B ladder tw euape graee per 3001 <b<, St<sto.+, 101111.. .n.1.p. typical roof mounted 101ar panels 'oh" k Vero ­adirmia1tw)sNardja c tmelt.i•s Ipurtama�ttlaroul jack,ro Kolbe window GO.. or equlv.wMte lu min y m <bd woodframe at 11 swNgdi 12 ONAGIN INTEGRATED ATTIC EXHAUST VENT, wrap extenorrtuwomrtorw tmlfn lntcall n heads, ad jamDS, and"hiClinstan 2x4 side ntial TL-40 yex Class A as halt/ fiberglas mmpuskian rooMgsyrt<m, gP.30e TYPICAL eM�dimennons o}ap abped stain grade rMwpod fills 9 gable end venk @0', cq ROOPIN6 O "TGM -LE l: ntea pnorto °:5x69. engvk.v <1-d TYPICAL - METAL'06EE- 2a GUTTER, TYPICAL rnpp bet order uulNU[orre mdel sGFt300 <Rnafurt hnan STUCCO SIDING, 6'.p0 ,< rlmere. (us <ambim 0113 bra TYPICAL foundation - isD total s.f. Wnts • 7.33 s.r. tor.. vOnv at peHmeter sae ertxlor 0""t,0bcrrypkait Vwaoclans). px uc. 3306.7. WRAP STUCCO OF WOC b.'lalse' gable end vents @tray .,r 1meu14 Pehb.'falu' p2lab. paintM 9.1. T A _ NEAD a JAMBS PRAM' WINDOW a SILL, � r Se TYPICAL 1). Flreplaceand<hn ey a. xterlor fireplace. loggia: T.O P AT O .., v T. BATH d LOGGIA BEDROOMS N6R MAN 4� Y i : 3 EXTERIORSTONO SEL9 - 1 / I' �C V'NEER, TYPICAL r I E Ir r iI. r I 19 WROUGHT IRON O UARDRAIL 4 3D P k );. }.Lq •Y I� I 1 F S OGHT. I I%ESGAP' ALL- TYPICAL "h Poo9 z :..Lx •, 's ad. a .. . >: .. . .: , ''s q. q;. .: :. '.� `: : . -ii. .3 a r. -� -- M�ADI $MOU9C ° -� - - - - - AV�RA6�EXTTIN66R.TD�: 4a�.61!' METAL DOWNSPOUT .. 2b TOUHDERSKOUND TIGHT DRAIN. TYPICAL yain[M wrought iron rmkn9s; picken @ 4' wc., w/ Ubs 4g bolted to potth <aumns a rekm,n9 walls s rcgwrea troiu:. u.no. 9wMran towmn,una m IDS. per lineal fmt IwPmy pp,its Mntontall at 99 o Yrall entslbs .h. Iwding lurSUllraiDcornpon ,[vpk+ Y l,<u.n.u. J6' hign wmugh[ iron guartlraii (px note a 1p abovel B ladder tw euape graee per 3001 <b<, St<sto.+, 101111.. .n.1.p. typical roof mounted 101ar panels 'oh" k Vero ­adirmia1tw)sNardja c tmelt.i•s Ipurtama�ttlaroul jack,ro 10. Par<h<s BSmops oops snarl corawm[n sec. 1003.3.1.), loot b<fw'T max. < down °tell BOws, ��1�•Per mot to drmn. tvN<H an.p. use ranmmiweaone r hmr mom mm, ww[[<rn, ,x in, -mono eea we, rypi<al. poured 5'[Rkk (min.)miM. conrete [kb por<hx, tYDiul, u.n.o. 10. EMerlor French Door, Kolbe window GO.. or equlv.wMte lu min y m <bd woodframe at 11 swNgdi 13. Gable End Attic Vents wrap extenorrtuwomrtorw tmlfn lntcall n heads, ad jamDS, and"hiClinstan 2x4 side ntial TL-40 yex Class A as halt/ fiberglas mmpuskian rooMgsyrt<m, gP.30e alai hat ntinpilm,.�pip' d taingrad<aWn vv eM�dimennons o}ap abped stain grade rMwpod fills 9 gable end venk @0', cq Frame cg wnN all I eES 0.-6076 mounted Ve Yx 0000 E ) bronte andla<O aWminum clad wood some ntea pnorto °:5x69. engvk.v <1-d u-, aa-pr<ae. p..ntM gl. mx.vmver.d v , w•9.l. SCrcerkdvmtf @rnnde rxe.e 16. Foundation Vents pmwde 6'x 1a'q.i. ureewd cant+ TapF'ox. rnpp bet order uulNU[orre mdel sGFt300 <Rnafurt hnan uder0oer 6'.p0 ,< rlmere. (us <ambim 0113 bra quN. w /aummatk tM1..... u.n o. foundation - isD total s.f. Wnts • 7.33 s.r. tor.. vOnv at peHmeter sae ertxlor 0""t,0bcrrypkait Vwaoclans). px uc. 3306.7. . W�Ta b.'lalse' gable end vents @tray .,r 1meu14 Pehb.'falu' p2lab. paintM 9.1. T A _ snown�typ�cal, u. n.o rypi!a, can. p. loomed vanes, ryPiot. a 1). Flreplaceand<hn ey a. xterlor fireplace. loggia: ta. P.d9 Vents Cor -A -vent mmdH nu. N4W ridge vmk at FL'MI N' GAP, a d0orgas tiuo xe by Heat 6e Gla, 42 tlll, fee Iplanederallf aii vaultM Ceiling rW9H ZVne•e fhown, 495.05' Dakota m U.L.e ri7, ryP<el, mil pv mamft. spec. <onhrm exact hTi[al. u -n.o. tyxul, u.n.o. L T model a and features w)ownn hefore 1s. Barge Rafter B Fascia a. 0ar.. rafter assembly u u fil Dorado St..., ptVPa ,a7.<ne, orderin , cal, u.n.o. in !uhured - q vYPI <cone slab Trim M1in uow gl.6rl MSe nos 9: p/1.2 Oear Limq pie 'medfMn lefhi Vr'. 9e p[43x6 Clear above mveneerfacirrgan,./i per owne :sfpen.. /<a.. lime - ntkaheah Upper ex nweevanx,f. typical.It... Ilood........... oM pacifu Lamrp Prprinrcd 6wq rahx. perrake Wood nc. deraih, vno ® I. In Per manor. speca..W stall <ukurM Stoney III CLEAR LAM ®pre -pnmtd b, 2x ItenHM taus° -rifled LO Cleilrlamen,It huWtrin ee dC.ails, usi. W layCal lain and snatch ma[ or stucco. 3 en <lessd Ndq. paper_q Tyvek® DuiWirp I�IYBIRIBI. ryqul. u.n.o �mM fsstia bwra fee details Nr mwe It... b cal, u.ne. 10. Par<h<s BSmops oops snarl corawm[n sec. 1003.3.1.), loot b<fw'T max. < down °tell BOws, ��1�•Per mot to drmn. tvN<H an.p. use ranmmiweaone r hmr mom mm, ww[[<rn, ,x in, -mono eea we, rypi<al. poured 5'[Rkk (min.)miM. conrete [kb por<hx, tYDiul, u.n.o. 10. EMerlor French Door, Kolbe window GO.. or equlv.wMte lu min y m <bd woodframe at 11 swNgdi refer to dew uM1MUle tw m we Info. troiol, 4i,,de ht. with 7/e'COlunlal[Imulad diviAM elm, spacer bu,.eM tempered deal side ntial TL-40 yex Class A as halt/ fiberglas mmpuskian rooMgsyrt<m, gP.30e alai hat ntinpilm,.�pip' d taingrad<aWn vv 11 k II his and Well g Y 9 sk li ht, Y9 Flan, Frame cg wnN all I eES 0.-6076 mounted Ve Yx 0000 E ) bronte andla<O aWminum clad wood some ktfi9nt,kes end rouVh �mekxm skyzlgntw`[0mhnt.."dwlterrr- flatnirp [tie penings.adn6dNihe s e r tx prr g all wN.L mane% naL vn.o ryes rnpp bet order b. wee an bend fly doz.m< 3dmmlr,g an eekwlndhwl 11 Mr more info rypual, u.n a. ::o aHm wa....d a mu a<e9ing Openings. bra see deralh, enn,,l, u.no, 12. Attic Evhadst Vehu a o'Hagin 0hrpositlon shingle Vent . W�Ta (24' wld,,17. Imolgi, oun� -high vmilrM1e s22 fq. T A _ snown�typ�cal, u. n.o EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1' -0" Q � --------------------------------------------- EXTERIORS lid TYPIGA 9KYLIGNT. --------- V'NEERR -TTYY .. "Li - : EMT -'12 anCeiN (TERRA •GOTTA) TYPICAL A: 4 - _ iz r,-lfr. ���14 9 S I6 ALIGN L FOVNDATION VENT W/ WINDOW (A.991! OCCURS), TYPICAL i 4� •_�o.:..Za :s.......a. ......... OUC 1, �rga�'fee..r....J!Rr_ ... W.-g�g�.. EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES,_; i 0.00fin9 system Elvk'vrestigpe prof' or Ce10t" Brad Renn side ntial TL-40 yex Class A as halt/ fiberglas mmpuskian rooMgsyrt<m, gP.30e fire Freed9 ® Alterna[a roof: tell undxlaYmen4 p /1R'evte•Inr 9rde Potlatch LuminO %dP 020 structural I }aii 1BIII�IBYRYk. ixM stzeathing oz Mon_ (°soil w)trYl kce down), [yprcal,un.n. 3. Gutters and Downspouts 51 : "a�nde.ixM metal' / n9ee'qutten, rypiui, ,ntoa�eeNUS rtw mwe NpkaL u.n.O. ]' a�rwonune pnndttiud mxei duwm spouts. to Plan fw,urta<e �t drainage. typical, on.o. [i9n, lines, and runteen yydifsip, t Mcatkn mown,as:equ A ra',port. 0.481 acres bra 3. noof lacks a <ahaust vents 1 vDWTa . W�Ta 02oo t <m<.trokxu b. plumDlnp vents n T A _ II P1. Oitp tit M Iwatea a m1n.01 10' Iran Or 3' abw¢rrNf or wall apenirpz y<r u< rypi!a, can. p. 506(6), 2D01 cpr, tYp ca., on.o. 4 Ov^ h-dd Garage tarn grdewca[em «e wdar uc i nal " CeOeraed piss+ kff ss crown a Aow FL'MI N' GAP, +NMuafa m0re'nlo, typitM.0 n. 5. Flashln g TYPIICAL 495.05' it hI9@ k. IolT'MP'R pit GI an ? 9 9 e h'rp paro<IM1 Cwrse Oe Mq M d LW pats paper at rake L T WOOD -FRAM' OORS, cgs TYPICAL i 4� •_�o.:..Za :s.......a. ......... OUC 1, �rga�'fee..r....J!Rr_ ... W.-g�g�.. EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES,_; i 0.00fin9 system Elvk'vrestigpe prof' or Ce10t" Brad Renn side ntial TL-40 yex Class A as halt/ fiberglas mmpuskian rooMgsyrt<m, gP.30e fire Freed9 ® Alterna[a roof: tell undxlaYmen4 p /1R'evte•Inr 9rde Potlatch LuminO %dP 020 structural I }aii 1BIII�IBYRYk. ixM stzeathing oz Mon_ (°soil w)trYl kce down), [yprcal,un.n. 3. Gutters and Downspouts 51 : "a�nde.ixM metal' / n9ee'qutten, rypiui, ,ntoa�eeNUS rtw mwe NpkaL u.n.O. ]' a�rwonune pnndttiud mxei duwm spouts. to Plan fw,urta<e con tall downspouts to a' dk undw 01-I drainage. typical, on.o. [i9n, lines, and runteen yydifsip, t Mcatkn mown,as:equ A ra',port. 0.481 acres ryDi<dI, u.n o. 3. noof lacks a <ahaust vents Povraen p, ne,rnaux vent, snanb<'xatd,mb,. oea r„h Env,. .n ab ove all molwwal oo -h-Per was4.tsag. < o r olwalwatewNre 02oo t <m<.trokxu b. plumDlnp vents n visib a Imrn street whxever pa+sibk, II P1. Oitp tit M Iwatea a m1n.01 10' Iran Or 3' abw¢rrNf or wall apenirpz y<r u< rypi!a, can. p. 506(6), 2D01 cpr, tYp ca., on.o. 4 Ov^ h-dd Garage tarn grdewca[em «e wdar uc i nal ve ,<t oorr CeOeraed piss+ kff ss crown a Aow Construction +NMuafa m0re'nlo, typitM.0 n. 5. Flashln g II flafhln 69 9IY fladirrp @all va ley, 495.05' it hI9@ k. InEe7P �mrgc m ? 9 9 e h'rp paro<IM1 Cwrse Oe Mq M d LW pats paper at rake L T piahbr<kfl hiq yi L'Oasro 9 @all wallm Pt<Ded cgs n eg,xle ose mgaASO;�d ,nda9 Ind h d f1 hog /d 369.9_ Z flashing abovew MOwsa dou, a pour d. Cahfornla of M•ool tram n9 Plan for snadM ­ ., inocu irwnra lraminy. 3x12 nal %. for new mnen ov-r •nor fneaking snhamrrp mwe rm. tup<al a ao. Exterior siding 6 tll,dng Wrt I IIM er 3/0 os0 Trim "U"11-1, 1 sh h' 9 / U4 /l dJ. provlde,tu«O W ee 7)0'ml 3 ow /t•ow<IM ample: for ar <nrlie<i•f sod h'Old world hnnn per owners spxz ,­id. mplelI Nnm.Uw/ weep screed pD /pull prior to linal finish o ,t@vbaseper 2D01 cbr .)065,° re-, q 2 bVll011'd- buildin9 paper. W Tyvek. b :,lla3n9wr +M tYdcal. u.n.n. typical, u.n.o, b. wlndowfln sit into all window& see detail+, typiul,uno. draihead�, and lambs, wrap eatxbrzw«n fish in!. wido-w a Eown<eds, ad Iambs. provide samylt of y Carson, (Ps yrwide lwm window silts manuf. by Carson trykN, u.n.u. odel a a sell I(i00 rova for appl In Held. 1...gs,wequiv. tone veneer M Dor do 5tone,H(1'GB pr. 15 -5o8. BbY ve.ifi exex none type /cdlw tn Owwrs, a,[alisttme wi nd rn HEVeol) or equn.• a'vn «kin ad f<man otau«o. M3brm :sa bulking paDx o/TWT YV <Y @DWWlrg wr,p,troKel, u. n.n. v rpn manuf. span., tvPi<N. B. Exterior Pemung e. ,u dace preparation: Iroroughly <kan ex[ori,rfu of all'dlr[. ap h", Palntad,rain nnivnes itrrth•per doss grease, xc. pnorm paintinq/s up. I NwouyyNrcaulksyx4le, fid,aM utd un<q:n rynufxcurn i,pen, a rxkf, On,, holes: etc at HlaHened a«az ,Ica t .i<al, u n.o. tupa:n[In[u<yui 11, u ' o. 0. -e-1 a < .. ding: 6u4-yyr all rauiaf, barge sroviee doe coat vrlmx, rwocwti oat lMe. a[ bOardL and[rim no, to u1tosiain9. Inskdanun. <, exterior wood vim: provide one<w[ iwo<.dumi-glou o1m, pal"[ at all caves, nim, quxen a dnwnipnun, wy<bwM,, x<. d. ."'.. °oat : «mi-uanf n prw: parent +kin nn sl<r by Cabot. or equN., rypl<al, u.n.o. 9. Hew windows s. typical tied wood nindnwf ref owuheduk Kolbe Wlnd.. CO... iv white wood hsmeed more inro. [rviul hone ® el �minuml'lad WI. .low s„ a admen a rued winnow,, w,m 7 /t' COlonlai "..feted JNWM rise's spacer Mn. pravke roan gred,aWx urksnazmm+w. aBI.B�IBllkx bPflberylac wlndD WS at showers Mllgard Window Co., w equly. paint -able fIDx9las frame uumert widow, with SimulatM dwidM o«S. trvi<al, u �.o. 7" MAX. MEI6HT' + 10_65'_ rl WNE1R SRIDING O CHIMNEY ARRESTOR ROOOFING SYYSTEM bLE TYPICAL F� < -' - - -s T.O. PLATED - MAIN FLOOR, TYP. ETAL DOWNSUNVT 1{I{IJJJgpplll 2b TO VNDERGROUND TIGHT DRAM, TYPICAL ARCHITECT The plans, ideas arrangements, and designs indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the property of the Architect and were created and developed solely for use on, and in connection with this specific project, and shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not originally intended without written permission from: NOEL F. CROSS, ARCHITECT, AI.A this symbol calls attention to a "green° materia6 or construction process. the general contractor and all subcontractors shall give special attention to locating, procuring, and installing this specific material, or one that is as equally environmentally sustainable, in many cases vendor phone numbers have been included. call the !� architect In the event you cannot locate the specified material. RENN RESIDENCE 05.13 -A Property Brad Renn Owners Ann Renn Project zo615 Marion Avenue Address Saratoga, CA 95070 -5817 Phone (408) 867 -3814 Parcel APN: 5o3- 22-101 Site Areas: 0.481 acres 20,936 sf Zoning R -1- 12,500, Single Family Residential,. City of Saratoga Setbacks Front: 2S, O" Rear: 25r 0"/35'-O" Side: 1o'-o "/15'-O" Construction Type V -N 495.oa' Occupancy R -3 495.05' P ROJ E CT DATA Project No. 05.13 -A Drawn By NFC /DSK /JMS /1TF Checked By NFC 455.00' Date 24 FEBRUARY 2o06 PIANNING SUBMMAL Revisions 31 JANUARY 2007 PLANNING DEPT. RESPONSE Sheet /t► 1 N o. '/�` Of date printed: 1/31/07 • 0 • _Lf-1:n MAX. HEIGHT 499.50' t NORTH CRTYRD PARTIAL ELEV. SCALE: 1/4" = 1' -o" ffAs 1 ®(SHOWN DO 3 ROOF"' TYPICAL N YPICA S' TL 2a cM,u°tteLR,� �d TTu-m- DINING ROOM ❑TEMPERE2 9 WOOD -PRA FRENCH DO TYPICAL ` E I snre°V� STONE LED CAPL W / BL 486.00' _ T.O gUBFLOOR �_ MAIN HOUSE rY , h •T P 'tamp 1 WEST ELEVATION Cal GARAGE SCALE: 1/4"= 1'-o" �7 Ir 499.50' 18'- O"MAX. HEIGHT A". CXIDI IN. .. GRADE: 484.50' / EAST ELEVATION�GARAGE �/ SCALE: 1/4"= , �L III "i'I 494.08' 488.00' STUCCO 9IDIN6, 3 TYPICAL __ T.O. PLATe• _ 494.08' GARAGE G.1. HEADER'S FLASHIN6 �e (SHOWN DOTTED). TYP. �$ HERAD 8 AME3 0- T PICAL DOORS, EEL PAVERS O/ CONGRET STOOP, TYPICAL. T.O. SLAB O 485.00' _ GARAGF A G _ SOUTH CRTYRD PARTIAL ELEV. SCALE: 1/4" = t' -o" V ELUXe SKYLIGHT, TYPICAL L,TYPICAL. T.O. ,,r , _ --1,41-49 S.08' KITCHEN WRAP STUCCOS HEAD- JAMBSOFWOOD FRAME WINDOW - BILL. TYPICAL STONE LEDGER MALL W /BLUESTONE O T.O.SUBP }� 406.00' MAIN HOUSE TDU DERGROUND TIGHT DRAIN. TYPICAL FOR° `KEYED (VOTES SEE SHEETS A5.o & A5,1 FOR EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES SOUTH ELEVATION 0 GARAGE SCALE: 1/4" - 1'-o" 18' -O" MAX. HEIbHT 499.60' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �jfAMPOSITON SHINGL NORTH ELEVATION Cad GARAGE SCALE: 1/4" = 1' -o" COMPOSITION SHINGLE 17 ATTIAGIG 3 TYPICAL SYSTEM, _ =r TYPICAL _ `"�? T`T�'•�� �i h 5�6.1. HEADER' - F -_� s �d TYP GADDING. (SHOwnDO Y . �'� ''�`-�`z`` -_A �`�� 444:09' 'B WRAP STUCCO O HEAD V .I 9 TYPICAL DOORS, I$ BLUESTONE PAVERS O/ 26 METAL DOWNSPOUT GOryCR - T UDER6 TYPICAL TIGHT T DRAIN. TYPICAL 6ARA6� V6 _ 495.00' ARCHITECT The plans, ideas arrangements, and designs indicated or represented by this draw" are owned by, and are the property of the Architeo: and were created and developed solely for use on, and in connection with this specific project, and shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not originally intended without written permission from: NOEL F. CROSS, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. this symbol calls attention to a "green" material or construction process. the - general contractor and all subcontractors shall give special attention to locating, procuring, and Installing this specific material, or one that is as equally environmentally sustainable. in many cases vendor phone numbers have been included. call the architect in the event you cannot locate the specified material. RENN RESIDENCE 05.13-A 444:08' Brad Renn Owners Ann Renn Project 1 1 I L.LJ 0, Fill 1 I Vill j III j l I I STUGGO SIDIHb. 'la TYPICAL lb $ MGD 9 0, GARAGE DOORS. ' TYPICAL V METAL DOWNSPOUT 2b TO UNDERGROUND TIGHT DRAIN, TYPICAL Saratoga, CA 95070-5817 i I I ! T.O. BLAB O 6ARAS lA.i�_ 1 4455.0a 48.Od NORTH ELEVATION Cad GARAGE SCALE: 1/4" = 1' -o" COMPOSITION SHINGLE 17 ATTIAGIG 3 TYPICAL SYSTEM, _ =r TYPICAL _ `"�? T`T�'•�� �i h 5�6.1. HEADER' - F -_� s �d TYP GADDING. (SHOwnDO Y . �'� ''�`-�`z`` -_A �`�� 444:09' 'B WRAP STUCCO O HEAD V .I 9 TYPICAL DOORS, I$ BLUESTONE PAVERS O/ 26 METAL DOWNSPOUT GOryCR - T UDER6 TYPICAL TIGHT T DRAIN. TYPICAL 6ARA6� V6 _ 495.00' ARCHITECT The plans, ideas arrangements, and designs indicated or represented by this draw" are owned by, and are the property of the Architeo: and were created and developed solely for use on, and in connection with this specific project, and shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not originally intended without written permission from: NOEL F. CROSS, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. this symbol calls attention to a "green" material or construction process. the - general contractor and all subcontractors shall give special attention to locating, procuring, and Installing this specific material, or one that is as equally environmentally sustainable. in many cases vendor phone numbers have been included. call the architect in the event you cannot locate the specified material. RENN RESIDENCE 05.13-A Property Brad Renn Owners Ann Renn Project 2o625 Marion Avenue Address Saratoga, CA 95070-5817 Phone (4o8) 867 -3814 Parcel APN: 503-22 -101 Site Areas: 0.481 acres 20,936 sf Zoning 11- 1- u,5oo, Single Family Residential, City of Saratoga Setbacks Front: 25'-0" Rear: 15' -O"/35=0" Side: Construction Type V -N Occupancy R -3 PROJECT DATA Project No. 05.13-A Drawn By . NFC /DSK /1MS /1TF Checked By NFC Date 24 FEBRUARY 2006 PLANNING suBMrlTAL Revisions //�� 31 JANUARY 2007 L� PLANNING DEPT. RESPONSE • • Sheet w • No. H■ Of date printed: 1/29/07 ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1,_0• EXTERIOR ELEVATION 19. Guardrails 1. Rooting SYS- Wk typical, u.n a. 9uardran to wdnttand 1D IDs. all /ornla Flee Fr<e® taall L.mi.oXe 058 St_l =Ic s nallerfa new taken over roof ^ d,taill 1. more In. . I,Pil.l, u. nn VdI.9 & 20. LighWEllap"Aall ,owe) elaad<r 1a' euape to grade prr 2001 Sturor Board sheatnmWlea [riot stucco siding: -Idl ell_ It.- oml.l It, ALI, F. CROSS 2. &­o­nd --p-11 typkal tool mounted solar panels NOEL t or ".c..11 N, " Is. .1-i ng P-1 W. Ind- I- .-.. ­.o linit, into.11 ee delaill. "n ele7AR = =A aof'acks. :caplet to [owditkce w /sdar panty im... , no typ-1. do. C H I CT A d',,. '. d 0 _'Po An' B. and run co In -o4l 11P.I. �uIORCIAAIZD(;[� DR t' 9 4 mt'no- d-I. r", go."' ..of sacks «Ihawt vents - land boles.[ 1. .-.a artas gazk in P-1.1 Ex 'm" noof"t-1.1-h- P, """ ' "' I. pl= - -" I. beiwateda min. et s0 wW--,nnmr­ t-Im"m ",a I'd 1-5 Innalliman" ..ad I,- 11-14, 1 0 lh.ad [eel, I-I l in RESIDENCE 'hod.le for mm' Imo, typical, The plans, ideas arrangements, and designs 5. Huhing [lashing indicated or represented by this drawing are It clad -.4 ...a.- owned h property of the Architect for to window uneduk Lorna[ info. tyD %a1. .. Indoor Co., -.1. - clad . "on, 191=111 .1 ­mam, - 0 ,k, all w',',ey,ia,,1':d%tnd, and developed 0 for use p, 'Id and on and in connection with this specific project, Ann Renn and shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any Proect j 20615 Marion Avenue Ii.W.9 c, plan b`taY " li.'! we, to pil"ad , I purpose for which they were not originally Vrom: ,,.,t window C. or en, -e frame <aument window. 'Mm Address deli tkpka1, d. a0,ket noshing intended without written permission NOEL F. (ROSS, ARCHITECT, A.LA ors "a"; 4 . I 9SO70-5817 'above, rvpkel. P.111,11 & sloop, "I", I -I 'be, I'1rr=1t1;%J2.*'a'4-"'. =1.-, fineno-n. t*i.. ..n." - "nalim aloell- I.- wJ .lI' .1 mm. .of., .." ion"n" in s - .Tina' aell wet '-d Revisions 31 JANUARY 2007. PLANNING DEPT, RESPONSE Sheet No. A6.o Of date printed: 1/31/07 • 19. Guardrails -d -Int oon 1."Inl-In W- Iq in path Ind I held 509. D able t6 -0(9) of typical, u.n a. 9uardran to wdnttand 1D IDs. all /ornla of pl., and roof I-In, pia"- shaded no... =Ic s nallerfa new taken over roof ^ d,taill 1. more In. . I,Pil.l, u. nn VdI.9 & 20. LighWEllap"Aall ,owe) elaad<r 1a' euape to grade prr 2001 Sturor Board sheatnmWlea [riot stucco siding: -Idl ell_ It.- oml.l It, ?'T-J t " .C. nt ='. w /t o- ooh -Old r<Mee is and neYS I Photo - Voltaic Solar typkal tool mounted solar panels wire hlM1.""Yencla >s'd "building ­ W t or ".c..11 N, " Is. .1-i ng P-1 W. Ind- I- .-.. ­.o linit, into.11 ee delaill. "n ®21. eltt'ukel Plan for more aof'acks. :caplet to [owditkce w /sdar panty W Ty,ekdii --q 'Willi. I.IneA min.. 'above, rvpkel. P.111,11 & sloop, "I", I -I 'be, I'1rr=1t1;%J2.*'a'4-"'. =1.-, fineno-n. t*i.. ..n." - "nalim aloell- I.- wJ .lI' .1 mm. .of., .." ion"n" in s - .Tina' aell wet '-d Revisions 31 JANUARY 2007. PLANNING DEPT, RESPONSE Sheet No. A6.o Of date printed: 1/31/07 • .in 1 flashing provkeloam window sills martyr. by tars01 Ind I held 'Id, - -no-, b a-i. npil..' .-- all /ornla of pl., and roof I-In, pia"- shaded a.i.g =Ic s nallerfa new taken over roof ^ d,taill 1. more In. . I,Pil.l, u. nn VdI.9 & wet 3/1 Sturor Board sheatnmWlea [riot stucco siding: -Idl ell_ It.- oml.l It, ?'T-J t " .C. nt ='. w /t o- ooh -Old r<Mee is and neYS I (,.I& riot to real finrfn wire hlM1.""Yencla >s'd "building ­ W t or ".c..11 N, " Is. .1-i ng P-1 W. Ind- I- .-.. ­.o linit, into.11 ee delaill. "n V', dj.- 'above, rvpkel. P.111,11 & sloop, "I", I -I 'be, I'1rr=1t1;%J2.*'a'4-"'. =1.-, fineno-n. t*i.. ..n." - "nalim aloell- I.- wJ .lI' .1 mm. .of., .." ion"n" in s - .Tina' aell wet '-d Revisions 31 JANUARY 2007. PLANNING DEPT, RESPONSE Sheet No. A6.o Of date printed: 1/31/07 • P-1d. -PI. of provkeloam window sills martyr. by tars01 <-- Coatings model a PS 10 s Co=,'a C. ^ W ppr ... I In field. in.. I -d.-' fi-ediI, rion-enee, In, 61 Dorado s an.. (L-.0. - -'So4: -n ) or - - 11 and scratch en" .- nne = t or ".c..11 N, " Is. .1-i ng P-1 with omme.. m4 ' ne eer per -.1. IVM' W Ty,ekdii --q 'Willi. B. Exterior Painting ­4, .1 and ruin mt'no- d-I. r", go."' - land boles.[ 1. .-.a artas plhL rim, to e.-ilit I., b. e.ind'. and Mm pity [o wW--,nnmr­ t-Im"m ",a I'd Innalliman" ..ad I,- 11-14, 1 ,iaino in d N' -in a RESIDENCE alw by Cali --I y0c... R E N N 9. New -d- It clad -.4 ...a.- for to window uneduk Lorna[ info. tyD %a1. .. Indoor Co., -.1. - clad . "on, 191=111 .1 ­mam, - Property Brad Renn '__ o.'ded I_ 7/8 w-d, Win grade -1 f$nilb at Owners Ann Renn """' ' " ' b Ob*" , -Ind- It 11 Proect j 20615 Marion Avenue ,,.,t window C. or en, -e frame <aument window. 'Mm Address S aratoga, CA 9SO70-5817 10. E.11011 French D1111 ..Ilail ..nd.w Co.. o, 1q.- -11. Phone (406)867-3814 ni-info. onpi,11. f"on, '7;dCl. divided and d- Parcel APN: 503-2.2-101 Sk,lighl, and Well V I., 11-h enomm. Site Areas; 0.481 acres Mlget sizes asW rough .noei--mmonedoe-na., skrlWnt wreomfon Dori dual tempered 10,936 sf b�. I I and pir Zoning R-1-12,500, Single _ nd Family Residential, City Of Saratoga All., Van'- to nigh [with 7g'a!-11 04=. 17 '.4 ,, , -)mol mounted venu ,hmm. typi<,I, on 0 Setbacks Front: 25=0" End Attic rlp I-- 11.1c. 11 - filil". Into 1112 -o/35'- Rear: 2.s' 0 vents Side: 10�0'/,S-0 lo" at; era vents nl. 011111 11,1 V -W/ l' te"ine'. Construction Type V-N S= Ind .. t._ model aeF1 Iao--'an a, 1-mon". Occupancy R-3 12'. ka, oreH meat -C 1' Ridge Vents Cior--1 -VWJ E r DATA Is. ..r,e a .nbarge rafter mIl Trim c i1r ,,.Q. We-pi.le.hiNle %W Project No. 05-13 -A inme, 1. laclfk Wood --tei" Inc. C'- LA Omit ­0 el.1i, dano!'.'17i 4, . -, b�nlx 1. died fall" Drawn By NFC/DSK/JMS/JTF typical. u.n.o. l 1-1- li-- - Veal -M P_ed I—. detail, N, -e into., . n Checked By NFC /ourkation 150 .1.111. -tl 1- I.f. '_=fat exterior 'Iel 'r ao'�,7 Date i+FE8RUARY2oo6 -1 lb, ­-, - .. PLANNING SUBMITTAL 7. Fireplace and Chleo-y .. eat..... f".P'.C. 9! 'above, rvpkel. P.111,11 & sloop, "I", I -I 'be, I'1rr=1t1;%J2.*'a'4-"'. =1.-, fineno-n. t*i.. ..n." - "nalim aloell- I.- wJ .lI' .1 mm. .of., .." ion"n" in s - .Tina' aell wet '-d Revisions 31 JANUARY 2007. PLANNING DEPT, RESPONSE Sheet No. A6.o Of date printed: 1/31/07 • 'CROSS SECTION A ARCHITECT �I 12 '� 12 NOEL F. CROSS ' 7 vn 12 �._. - =4 I ' = indicated plans, ldrearesentol eby this draw oe9siane owned by, and are the property of the Architect _..- -- -- wn P + and were created and developed soiel, for use and shall not be used, in whole or in part, orlany �I I I �!I� �'aII u purpodse for which they were not originally .. .. /r�.f� II III`, TT��� /���! /� I mien NOEL CROSS, written permission from: T!'YK _ LAU i 1, Ii L i I I I II ._ 5 , RCHITE A.I.A. NALL 1.05, FOYER OF�IGE !wl ou I l i � III I I i!ilI I! 4 SA T.O. St1BFl.K:_. \ / ii Iii \ I To. pv, this symbol calls attention to a "green' DATA — — — — — — ... .. .. _. .. ... _. ... contractor s. all ,�— 9meater a or construction process. t st e I neral contra and subcontractors shall give special cat attention installing this specific at rialnor one ntally �JT�lKHA �7 I phone 1 y that is as equally envlron :_c I sustainable. In many cases vend 11 I I numbers have been included. l l,� architect in the event you cannot locate the spedfied material. 1 ' I.i WE r�� Y 1 ITT— CROSS SECTION [i RENN RESIDENCE I - Property brad Renn Owners Ann Renn '\ MAK bJM*_K Project 2062o CA Avenue 510:5$' Address 95070 a 5617 12 � p� Phone (408) 867 -3814 7` Parcel APN: Site Areas: 0.478 acres 20,811 sf / Zoning Fam Iy R0 ident al City of Saratoga I Setbacks Front: 25'-0" X Rear: 25' 0 " /3S' -0" A ! - Side: 10'-0 " /15`0" ® I -- ___ ._y__ s v Construction Type V-N 10. t{.. �aFa7 tihi. _ To. IL. 4V5.05, - _ — Occupancy R-3 i I'III PROJECT DATA o GREAT R ; lkLt.�RYi !I AI�T>Z ( Q MASTER U' Et�IZM j!j I . Project No. 05.13 -A Drawn By NFC /DSK/1M5 /JTF 'I T,O. suDFt.F•.4&o,D' II li / _\ T0. F., 4&,.d Checked By NFC T.D. Ke4R_�ATICN W, i 1c _ ' . ... ( Ta 4$495� Date 454.77' '� - Ex15TGr._ A i I a I Revisions RE69EATION F'R MTH i! •T.o: ca to. 3 Ag j –I 47 8T 475.ST f - x .}� r:.«.- � � ;e I Sheet T,O. GaNG. I .. 5 'tr fill 1 S3 so date ate printed: 2!13/06 am ANON NOTALLUNDERGROUND UTILRV LINES ., yp SE CONr CTEE) ON TK' MAP USA. MU5F y, �3j-{ �i i BE COMACTED FO DflERMINFIO'-ALIONS \ L c S+N'C• QF ALL VnM LtNeS PRIOR i0 APN 1.IG6MG. // Q PA 6 u r. }p� .0— .- - w 6' AL S f bp Lw NE / pttP•'a% r NOiC NO '1.. _: _.. ...A. I cp zGnD 0 Ie • 4. sAn Tntzr ''9PnraZ DC _e�� • y`' - �Q5.08• PA2LEL- MOP 4(°0.43 WAS MHRIO.,%o• - /, \p YRACE� a CO11FIQftE0 uv TNIt -RF j% --_ ... .._ -..` N 6-a IRon kAju, Mf,IN Ca4t �ER`r'�obt' L� StlR,FY �4RJC.. ;J. r i yJ(1 -ro LIrJ I � ,�( LpLk'fi0 StY Jorc d QEaseNIE41,&5wQ#QAR6PE2 �'�)°3/ erorlEac, 07 E LEJA7f OrJ DATJM'I P.MAP 46D-a� ]t11LLftLRSpA ,V J$ILIF[o --c ��•. j3 q U•S.Ce.s. S 180 eF4r L4 (AAMIe PL PoS-r oVRCE/ r(�� e• ' O LOTo r.e 4••t AS L1tTEr�l120 TO REAII) Slit. \3Y F1 SIRe1Z oSq,e AwN" ^W I ASSOC,ArES Foa TDM 0 Qn IN i99o:eLeJ,a,4.43 q�• d v 0 P o u It di g w A VARcu fq^? AUd NmED TKC �1 10•De4LCATLD,J uiOJU REA ef iMP7i13 aEPOB.t S s ,] / i °+�' �^ gCc.��flTn ;cE• co¢E r�E Ek� aec. -Es 2nii oP o,SDO O S - ___ _.'.'may _---__ - •...... IN. 3. C;; S " y .. aq .ma i�J .. -..... _... i..... .e. _...- ..e_.. -._y �) S W 9 2 M _ o _6oJ,JoA2t SHOLLIhI ; N do ® { p�' �-�.y. - ^�'V_.._. "_ • at? Q �c 1' �I lid LE VI IS lelf9 a\A 1� M IV ply �N p4 e�. 4K 011� _ G a 9`` lay S Ama' •�'t - N OPAL JS o,a Kg F. a rJ �Iy � e�Jcg_ o A0 O � �.' -. Pa � s ��� 1 f 'gyre . � p�v � - t�•yyo' ! � 3�' ^, ` f / �St�3 ?a ts,' � Ln a • ( heDN' ✓ "Ltz' \ _ tF�.. ✓� Cr� 3•e ,�• p`'v U (. `' 32 c sACI•. ' !41-- � Sq • � � A %� J � ,•.A6 a.- l L „1 �' I 9) c y r - ._--y d 4G ' .f?1 '� i . � J .� 1 1 Q?•' •, ' „atiye , - '� . \ Dr Erb �4 fey N.t tt J3 tP. �f,'- , �� r'w .' ` / � �,+'�'({[- �',. +° s�oS4•m 01(p. L It p S.. '•y '� \ u F S .cpy !. e;j�Fi y\ AofSe Ar 9Yl 4 Sk J ' �l�' 0.m S ITE SJ 2dE N, t r L,T% *Aa e'a. PARCEL MAP 960.13 it: L_AI)OS OF �a0 cD Wes%, 3FV� � ¢ . � ?4,�p�+• ^ 1? S � P —\rgrI r\ENK 4 P — 2o6fS 4 20(cAs mARLOAI A\(E,. $AFLATO!°A, CA. -- &- Z9.2ooi�l LDa��d .��w oALs\ f Fi��� yAW- tv diO�OP NUDUp`en cj0.� c f i\ age? /y� 17 flP S{L� Y`` o° v o ROGER E. DODGE, LS „,� ER �¢ May \S y� ¢ no. 3295 9 Dodge Assoc. Surveying 41 �• Ldb \ \h Is Pte'. tL �� * 63 2erin aHey, C Circle. Penn Valle CA 95946 PPP Op ' - . 4- Ik -°.4 2ef.'f'i MsG. eASR O2nrfL0 — Iia RL CtW i��707 O/tU1 P o f,u i� • RENN RESIDENCE - z06z5 MARION ROAD, SARATOGA; CA 95070 483 S 00'10' 00' W p R4 LANDSCAPE LEGEND AREA TABULATIONS — LOT A 136.97' SITE AREA = 10,936 sq. ft. = 0.481 Acres (E) Lxisting FLOOR AREA Allowable Floor Area 4,oSo8 sq. ft. I (P) .Proposed PA Planting Area 20' h (6'x 78) 9 ,6 b to m \ 4,5'18 q. ft. 11.58 % of Lot Area O O 2o62s Marlon' -FLOOR AREA I 8'X 8' Spa w/ (E) House Floor area 1,334 sq. ft. (heated) V as on (E) Carport = 433 sq. ft. (E) Detached Garage' = 1,-35 sq. ft. - wBluestone Cap (E) Residence FAR = 3,002 sq. ft. Qndudes garages) - - - - _ _ New House FA0. (N) Residence FAR = 3,183 sq. ft. above grade - heated cc N cn (N) Attach Garage FAR = 635 sq. ft. -1 car T (N) Det. Garage FAR = 663 sq, ft. -z car plus shop Total Proposed FAR 4,481 Sq. ft = (N) Basement z,003 sq. ft. below grade - heated IMPERVIOUSCOVERAGE _� _- _ Maximum Allowable = 20,936 sq. ft. _ 55.00 %of Seba` Impervious Coverage x ­1 Lot Area (E) n,515 sq. ft. , \- House Footprint = 3,183 sq. ft. - - -_ Garage Footprint = 635 sq' ft. z Garage Footprint = 663 sq, ft. ctb' \ Floc Loggias, Porches = 418 sq. ft. Light Wells 294 sq. ft. \ Driveway 3,077 sq. ft. - POOI/Spa/ Terrace = 2,396 sq. ft. I on Concrete Slab Front Walks 535 sq.ft. Side Courtyard Garden 308 sq. ft. \ Proposed 11,5o9 sq. ft.- 54.97 %Of Impervious Coverage j Lot Area (P) (1) Magnolia denudata 24" Box (P) (24) Carpinus Betulus European Hombeam (5 Gal) 483 483 S 00'10' 00' W p R4 t 136.97' Q U _ _ J / 0 20' h J 9 ,6 b to m \ � 36" High Ledger h a A Stone Wall I 484 O O r- 24" High Ledger Stone Wall = 8'X 8' Spa w/ 20' x x 9' Hi g Cor -Ten Steel Arbor E V as on - S 70- d wBluestone Cap " 5 (n b Vineyard / - wBluestone Cap _ _ Bluestone Coping - - - - _ _ Rear 35 tub cc: a cc N cn T Gate ; Rear k \ I _� _- -Wood 5 1 aGk ' \ Seba` \ —S (E) \- - -_ ctb' \ Floc Perennial Fence \ Bluestone Paving \ LLLLLLL LLLLLLLLL L f I on Concrete Slab Bluestone Paving COURTY \ i \\ Size: Random \ \ / Border,Typ, \ Pattern: Ashlar 12'x40' Pool wBluestone Co i .O d, \ \ \ LLLLLLL LILILLLLLLLLLLLLLL L LLI.LLL LL LLLLL LOGGIA on Conc. Slab Size: Random \ GARAGE LL _LLLLLL LLLLLLL 4 \ Shrub/Perennial - 483 a p R4 W (L Q U 0 J \ O O Q� N E W irO U Z_ Z g0 L J 20) Z Fn to to f- Rear 35 tub cc: a cc N cn Rear k \ Seba` \ —S (E) \- 6' Redwood Fence \ Bluestone Paving \ LLLLLLL LLLLLLLLL L \ I on Concrete Slab �'L LLLLLLLLLLLLLLL \ i \\ Size: Random tLuLLLLLLLLLLLLLL 484 Pattern: Ashlar LLLLLLLLILLLLLLL- LL IL-LLLL.LLLLLLLL .O d, \ \ \ LLLLLLL LILILLLLLLLLLLLLLL L LLI.LLL LL LLLLL \ GARAGE LL _LLLLLL LLLLLLL 4 'LLLL .LLLLLLLILL LLL LL Lt Pool ` LL Ll LL LWCLLLLLLLL�I.L LLLCLLLLL.LLLLLLLLLLL L�� Mechanical �\ IL. LLLLLLLLLLLL L LrLLLLLLLLLLLLI -I O U o to 0 U ai .o `r '.I.� / nZ• rn rn H n rn cn 485 S 00'10' 00' W 233.88' Pattern: Ashlar - \ Border Perennial \\ d Border, \ O GARAGE Typ \ i (P) (2) Wisteria % - 'Longissima Alba' \ (E) 25" Ulmus Standards (15 Gal) / a americana (P)(25) Buxus sempervirens j PORCH American Elm English Boxwood (5 Gal) Bluestone Paving \ on Conc. Slab - \ l (P) —J (E) —� (1) Magnolia'Elizabeth' 6'RedwoodFence 24" Box Size: Random Pattern: Ashlar - -\'. 10' Wide Gravel Parking Area 1, 9 485 �y / -Z_ 2G -- ,\ (P) (8) Carpinus Betulus European )3' Hi \ �Shrub/Perennial Hornbeam Wood y \ Border I Gate \ LL��LL — _ _L LLLV�KLL LLLL LLLLLI.LLLL L LLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLL LLLLL. LLB LLLLLLL \ LLLLL LLLL LL LLLLLLLLLLLL' LLLLI_LLL LLLLLLLLL LL L LLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLL :LL LZ"'_L [Zt LLLL- LLLLL LLL. LLLI_LLLLLLLLLILLIII LLLLLLLLLLLILLLLLLLLLLLLLI .LLL LLILLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLL�LLLLLLLLLI_LLLLIII Ll...ILLLLLLL LLLLLLLLL LLLILI_Lt .l.L LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL.LL LLLLL LLLLL'_LLLLLLLLI.LLLLL \ .LLL LLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLILLLLLLLLLLI___ LLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLL _LLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLI _ LLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLL Calstone Quarry 36" High Ledger 3' High Stone Paving Stone Wall Wood Entry River Rock WBluestone Cap Gates Tan /Charcoal on Sand Base $.P. CHRISTOPHER YATES DESIGN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE CA LICENSE #4833 107 RAMONA AVENUE PIEDMONT, CALIFORNIA 94611 TEL (5 10) 601.1499 FAX (510) 601 -1493 Kay Plan stamp \AHDSWPp 4��cs}.oQ.jtYATpsSY�m �a a �A�OF Z a W (L Q U 0 J t y O O Q� N W irO U Z_ Z g0 L ZO 20) Z Fn to to W W t0 fC cc: a cc N cn Issue Permit Dale 1115/06 Project: RENN BY' CV scale t' Sheet LANDSCAPE PLAN L -1.0 of • L • Vineyard Beyond r 6' Redwood I Fence Il I Ledger Stone Wall wBluestone Garage (P) Magnolia'Elizabeth' 24" Box Cap ` a Pool Mechanical �' - - - -� Pool - I� Spa --- I I �)1 Property 25' Rear Yazd Line Setback • Cor -Ten Steel Arbor w /Grapevi Ledger Stone Wall w/Bluestom Cap (E) 25" Ulmus americans American Elm Property 10' Side Line Yard Setback Cor -Ten r Steel Arbor w /Grapevines NORTH ELEVATION Scale: 1/8" = i' -0" WEST ELEVATION Scale: I/8" = 1' -0" ■?Il�t� 1ili,�� J I (E) 25" Ulmus americans American Elm (P) Magnolia denudata 24" Box CHRISTOPHER YATES DESIGN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE CA LICFNSE #4833 107 RAMONA AVENUE PIEDMONT. CALIFORNIA 94611 TEL (510) 601 -1499 FAX (510) 601 -1493 Key Plan SbmppSeAPF }�� �jIYAiF NCH OF Z O H U W U) Z O Q W J W N O n o 0rn Q to W X Z= E U z 0U LU Z �_ 2 rn 7 \Iv Z(1) Nm Vv W W to r — (P) s Cr- r2 06) cli II Carpinus betulus Fastigiata' I Revision. rEuropean I I I Ledger Stone 1 I Hornbeam Wall wBluestone 5 Gal — Cap I lasus Peanil Data 2115M Entry Courtyard Shiub/Perennial Border I Project RENN Sy:cY i it I Scale: AS SHOWN 111' 25' Front Yard Property Setback Line sheet ELEVATIONS/ SECTIONS L -2.0 'I of 3' Wood Gates 6' Redwood 4 Fence _ -- — 3' Ledger Stone Wall (p) Driveway wBluestone Buxus Cap sempervirens English Boxwood 10'Side Property 5 Gal Yazd Line Setback ■?Il�t� 1ili,�� J I (E) 25" Ulmus americans American Elm (P) Magnolia denudata 24" Box CHRISTOPHER YATES DESIGN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE CA LICFNSE #4833 107 RAMONA AVENUE PIEDMONT. CALIFORNIA 94611 TEL (510) 601 -1499 FAX (510) 601 -1493 Key Plan SbmppSeAPF }�� �jIYAiF NCH OF Z O H U W U) Z O Q W J W N O n o 0rn Q to W X Z= E U z 0U LU Z �_ 2 rn 7 \Iv Z(1) Nm Vv W W to r — (P) s Cr- r2 06) cli II Carpinus betulus Fastigiata' I Revision. rEuropean I I I Ledger Stone 1 I Hornbeam Wall wBluestone 5 Gal — Cap I lasus Peanil Data 2115M Entry Courtyard Shiub/Perennial Border I Project RENN Sy:cY i it I Scale: AS SHOWN 111' 25' Front Yard Property Setback Line sheet ELEVATIONS/ SECTIONS L -2.0 'I of ,o Ndld 39VNIVNCI w4s AD:Ra NN3a'P0fdd 901,12 -4-0 V.—d ---I 9 wN mm 2 o Ln z K OZ mo Z oz n 3 m m �D U� 0 0 G) Z 00 z D G) m z o, �'yJyys31VA1ti� �n 3dyMe dwe,S ueld AN £641-109 (0t0 XV3 6661-109 (010 -133. 11916 Vl"0alIVO'lN0WQ31d WW9A V V NOWV -H L01 ££84,R 3SNH0I'I V0 32Ii11331110XV 3dV0SQNV'I NDIS3Q SEUVA 'd3HdO.LSRIHD '30a31HSIVa1s 100! N31 V KIM 031531 N3HM HONI 3NO NIH11M 30V80 Ol 3f1a1 38 IIVHS SV38V 030VNO IIV 'S 'S3dOlS 30 5301 ONV Sd01 330 ONf10a 'SONIMV80 NO 803 03I1VO SS3IN0 SONf10N 03ZIlV3OI 80 S10dS MOl 100H11M ONIOV80 30 S3NVld MUNI NIVINIVYV 'SV38V 13A31 A13ALLV138 ONV S3dOIS N33M138 SNOIIISNVU N3A3 H100NS 301A08d 1, 'S3dOIS 1N30V1`OV 30 SSTa8V038 8Nflld S1SOd 30N33 11V OOH '3SIM83H10 031VOIONI SS31Nn 13A31 SIIVM 30 Sd01 ONV S3ON33 OIOH '£ 'SONIMVHO S,833NION3 INTO 3H1 H1lM ONIdld ONV 11f10N0O 'S3lOHNVN 'SNIV80 IIV 30 SNOILVOOI A3163A 'Z 'HaOM 311S ONION31NNOO Ol 8018d SONIMVaO ONIa33NION3 ONV IVaf11O3LIH06V 1N3A3138 H1lM 3d00S 3dVOSONVI ONLL0333V S88f1O 0NV SOVOa 'SNIV80 'SIIVM 'SONIOII(18 ONl1SIX3 llV 30 SNOLIVA313 A3Ia3A 'I S31ON ONIav2 o 3ddOSONb'l NIV80 V38V 038 ONI1NVld Nl"0 V38V 3dVOS08VH IIVM 30 N01108 M8 IIVM 30 d01 M1 d31S 30 d01 S1 ONIAVd 30 d01 dl NMVI 30 d01 101 88f1O 30 dOl Ol NORVA313 N18 38 3NII 30018 la iNIOd HOIH dH 30V89 ON8SIX3 03 30VW HSINt3 O3 GN3OT ONIOWJ9 • • • • a� 1[5 0- �1 z ee 1 ARBORIST REPORT —SITE PLAN iN.T.S. - � a } f'a 4 - T L o{ eaq community DOwlopmant Department Cuy of i3TRSaiab9a 13777, c dine Awnua $aeab3a.l,aaNmla awrg 1� yr_.w e ?�tFORt�l/ 20625 Marton Ave Applicatipn #: 06.292 ARBORIST'REPORT M rch 30, 2006 APN 503 -22 -101 Prepared by Aare Bear Owner: Recur i ISA Ccrtifed Arbon t WE 2250A Introduction The property owner of 20625 Mariao?Avenuc has submitted plans to demo ish the existing house, carport and garage and build a new house, (teiachM garage and swimling Pool. Four trees protected by City Ordinance were inventoried for this project anti may be exposed to impacts . from construction. They include one Siberian elm ( 01) and three Italian slgne pines ( #2-4) on the neighbor's property. The locations of each tree are noted on the attached py of the landscape plan and each tree has been assigned a number. Trees #2 -4 are shown in their app +Imate locations, but have not been surveyed. Specific data for each tree is compiled in a table at the end of this report. Plans reviewed for this report include. Sheet A -1.0. Site Plan, dated March[, 2006 (by Noel F. Cross, architect), Sheet C -0, Topographic Plan (by Roger E. Dodge, L.S.), Sheet 1.0, Landscape Plan, dated .'. Februsry.15, 2006 (by Christopher Yates.Design), and Sheet Cl, Grading nd Drainage,. dated March 20, . 2006 (by M Leod and Assoc ates) The three Italian stone pines on the adjacent property are not shown on the topographic survey and must be surveyed and added. The drawings show a new driveway about two fe �t from the fence line, within the canopy and mot none of the stonepines. 1 recommend making the dnvcway five feet narrower along the stretch next to the trees to avoid excavation within the drip line of the [rce canopies. Per City Ordinance 15- 50.oso, a bond amount of $26,200, which is equal to 100% of the total appraised value of the trees protected by ordin lace, is required for this project. Thi{ total appraised value represents the combined value of trees #1 -17. Appraisal values are calculated according to the CMde for Plant Appraisal, 9`a Edition, published by the International Society of Arboricu um, (ISA), 2000. Design Requirements E This entire report shall be incorporated into the set of fr"al building plans and be titled Sheet T -1 (Tree Protective Measures). Additionally the Site Plan must show the location of protective i - - - - fencing as Identified on the attached map. 1 Trees 112-4 must be surveyed and shown on the drawings. 3. Trenching for irrigation, lighgng, drainage or any other aspect of he project most amain outside of the aces' cairopis:- Ififrigation"lines or electrical lilies for Iighlting are desigriainside drip 1 Page 1 0172 £OGTS']C{anun Avenue lines of the trees canopies, they can be.placed on top. of existing oil grade and covered with,: - - -- - - wool n a p D r other mulch 'ARBORISf REPORT t 4. Design urigauon so that it d not spray trunks of tree TREE INVENTORY TABLE 5. Stones, mulch or other landscape features must beat least one foot from the trunks of retained f h writ's of new trees trees and 6 aches fir e o 6. Tilling or stripping of the topsoil bereath the trees' canopies is not allowed, including for weed control. 7. Bender boom or other edging material proposed beneath the trees' canopies should be established on top of existing soil grade (Such as by using stakes). Tree Protecting Measures 1. Tree protective fencing shall be installed as shown on the attacht d map and established prior m demolition or the arrival of odnstnetion materials On site. It shall be comprised of six -foot high chain link fencing mounted on eight -foot tall, two -inch diameter galvanized posts, driven 24 inches into the ground and spiced no more than 10 ket apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be miintained throughout the wmtmction process until final inspection. 2. Unless otherwise approval, all construction activities must be conductod mttside the designated ftrteed area (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not neessarily limited to, the following: demolition, grading, ranching, equipment cleaning, stockpiling and dumping materials (including soil fill), and equipmentivehicle operation and parking. 526,100.00 -... .__. ___....._ .. . .. ... ..: .... .._._.__.._.___ ... _. ........ __._ _. _..__ ... .._... _... Tout Appraised Value 3. Any approved grading or trenching beneath the trees' canopies shall be manually, performed using. shovels. 17� I 4. Any pruning of trees on site must be performed under the supetliSion of an 1SA Certified Arborist or ISA - Certified Tree Worker and according to ISA standards. Replacement True 4 lies _ _, _, . -___ -_ _ . -_.. _ __ . - -- —. _. _ _. ..... _._. . __ . _ . _. 5. The disposal of hannfu] products (such as chemicals. oil and gasoline) is prohibited beneath tree ` l5 gallon = 5I50 24 loch box = SSUp 36 inch hex = 51,$W canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath we carwpies. Additionally, fuel shall 4a'i+uh box = T5,W0 52 ieh box 36 i 22 x - box S I5,W0 not be stored nor shall any refueling or maintenance of equipment occur within 20 feet of the tree's woks. �. I Should any tree tisld.b— b.— damaged onw will be -q--d to repur the damage. 6. Herbicides shall not be applied beneath the nee canopies. Where, used on site, they must be Shedd any gee listed ab— be imimeal oxv<r will ba mqui.d to replace out tree with he's labeled for safe use near treat:' equal m vale to As ..,.a vale. Attachments: i Tree Inventory Table Map Showing Tree Locations + �I Addtta. 20625 Marion Avenue 11 —1, 30, 2006 Page 2 of 2 ARCHITECT The plans, ideas arrangements, and designs indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the property of the Architect and were and and developed solely for use on, and in connection with this specific project, and shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not originally intended without written permission from: NOEL F. CROSS, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. this symbol calls attention to a "green" material or construction process. the general contractor and all subcontractors shall give special attention to locating, procuring, and installing this specific material, or one that Is as equally environmentally sustainable. In many cases vendor phone numbers have been included. call the architect In the event you cannot locate the specified material. RENN RESIDENCE Property Brad Renn Owners Ann Renn Project 2o625 Marion Avenue Address Saratoga, CA 95070 -5817 Phone (408) 867 -3814 Parcel APN: S03-22 -101 . Site Areas: o.481 acres 2o,936 sf Zoning R- 1- 12,5oo, Single Family Residential, City of Saratoga Setbacks Front: 25 =o" 9 t -_ a_ o a5 Occupancy R -3 _ Project No. 05.13-A Drawn By NFC/DSK /1MS /1TF Checked By NFC Date ¢ c j 8 g' .g a w.8 p = y - Z. N0. TREE NAAfC ti er vi 5 0 x 6 1 sixrian elm ! /lmvs umilu 25.5 35 50 50 (food Hi S11,10000 2 haliar"unie lame Pinar in 26.5 30 50 50 Good Bib 53,600.00 3 Italian stone pine Anus in 38.5 50 50 50 Gnd Hi 5fi,9W.W L_4 Initan atone pink pious in 30 35 50 50 Ood His, $7600'00 trees and 6 aches fir e o 6. Tilling or stripping of the topsoil bereath the trees' canopies is not allowed, including for weed control. 7. Bender boom or other edging material proposed beneath the trees' canopies should be established on top of existing soil grade (Such as by using stakes). Tree Protecting Measures 1. Tree protective fencing shall be installed as shown on the attacht d map and established prior m demolition or the arrival of odnstnetion materials On site. It shall be comprised of six -foot high chain link fencing mounted on eight -foot tall, two -inch diameter galvanized posts, driven 24 inches into the ground and spiced no more than 10 ket apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be miintained throughout the wmtmction process until final inspection. 2. Unless otherwise approval, all construction activities must be conductod mttside the designated ftrteed area (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not neessarily limited to, the following: demolition, grading, ranching, equipment cleaning, stockpiling and dumping materials (including soil fill), and equipmentivehicle operation and parking. 526,100.00 -... .__. ___....._ .. . .. ... ..: .... .._._.__.._.___ ... _. ........ __._ _. _..__ ... .._... _... Tout Appraised Value 3. Any approved grading or trenching beneath the trees' canopies shall be manually, performed using. shovels. 17� I 4. Any pruning of trees on site must be performed under the supetliSion of an 1SA Certified Arborist or ISA - Certified Tree Worker and according to ISA standards. Replacement True 4 lies _ _, _, . -___ -_ _ . -_.. _ __ . - -- —. _. _ _. ..... _._. . __ . _ . _. 5. The disposal of hannfu] products (such as chemicals. oil and gasoline) is prohibited beneath tree ` l5 gallon = 5I50 24 loch box = SSUp 36 inch hex = 51,$W canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath we carwpies. Additionally, fuel shall 4a'i+uh box = T5,W0 52 ieh box 36 i 22 x - box S I5,W0 not be stored nor shall any refueling or maintenance of equipment occur within 20 feet of the tree's woks. �. I Should any tree tisld.b— b.— damaged onw will be -q--d to repur the damage. 6. Herbicides shall not be applied beneath the nee canopies. Where, used on site, they must be Shedd any gee listed ab— be imimeal oxv<r will ba mqui.d to replace out tree with he's labeled for safe use near treat:' equal m vale to As ..,.a vale. Attachments: i Tree Inventory Table Map Showing Tree Locations + �I Addtta. 20625 Marion Avenue 11 —1, 30, 2006 Page 2 of 2 ARCHITECT The plans, ideas arrangements, and designs indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by, and are the property of the Architect and were and and developed solely for use on, and in connection with this specific project, and shall not be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose for which they were not originally intended without written permission from: NOEL F. CROSS, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. this symbol calls attention to a "green" material or construction process. the general contractor and all subcontractors shall give special attention to locating, procuring, and installing this specific material, or one that Is as equally environmentally sustainable. In many cases vendor phone numbers have been included. call the architect In the event you cannot locate the specified material. RENN RESIDENCE Property Brad Renn Owners Ann Renn Project 2o625 Marion Avenue Address Saratoga, CA 95070 -5817 Phone (408) 867 -3814 Parcel APN: S03-22 -101 . Site Areas: o.481 acres 2o,936 sf Zoning R- 1- 12,5oo, Single Family Residential, City of Saratoga Setbacks Front: 25 =o" Rear: 25'-0"/35'-0" Side: 10'-O"/15=0" Construction Type V -N Occupancy R -3 PROJECT DATA Project No. 05.13-A Drawn By NFC/DSK /1MS /1TF Checked By NFC Date Revisions Sheet No. T- 1A . Of