Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-10-2007 Planning Commission Packetjl October 10, 2007 • CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION SITE VISIT AGENDA • DATE: Tuesday, October 9, 2007 — Approximately 3:30 p.m. — 5:00 p.m. PLACE: City Hall Parking Lot, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue TYPE: Site Visit Committee SITE VISITS WILL BE MADE TO THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ROLL CALL REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA AGENDA 1. APPLICATION #07- 126/PSP07 -0002 Miller Avenue /19550 Prospect Road Church of the Ascension The Site Visit Committee is comprised of interested Planning Commission members. The committee conducts site visits to properties that are new items on the Planning Commission Agenda. The site visits are held on the Tuesday preceding the Wednesday hearing, between 3:30 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. It is encouraged that the applicant and/or owner to be present to answer any questions that may arise. Site visits are generally short (10 to 20 minutes) because of time constraints. Any presentations and testimony you may wish to give should be saved for the Public Hearing. During the Site Visit, the Planning Commission may only discuss items related to the project. The agenda does not allow any formal votes or motions on the proposed project or other matters. The Site Visit is a fact - finding meeting where the Commission may discuss the item and ask questions from or hear statements from members of the public attending the Visit. No comments made during the Site Visit by the Planning Commission are binding or required to be carried through to the formal public hearing where actions will be taken on the proposed project. PA\PC SITE VISITS \Site Visits\2007\SVA 100907doc.doc • CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA DATE: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 - 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Council Chambers /Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting ROLL CALL: Commissioners Manny Cappello, Rishi Kumar, Robert Kundtz, Susie Nagpal, Linda Rodgers, Yan Zhao and Chair Joyce Hlava PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: MINUTES: Draft Minutes from Regular Planning Commission Meeting of September 26, 2007 ORAL COMMUNICATION: Any member of the Public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three minutes on matters not on this agenda. The law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Planning Commission may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Planning Commission direction to Staff. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS- PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTION TO STAFF: REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on October 4, 2007 REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS: If you wish to appeal any decision on this Agenda, you may file an "Appeal Application" with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15- 90.050 (b). CONSENT CALENDAR: - None PUBLIC HEARINGS: All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. Applicants /Appellants and their representatives have a total of ten minutes maximum for opening statements. Members of the Public may comment on any item for up to three minutes. Applicant/Appellants and their representatives have a total of five minutes maximum for closing statements. 1. APPLICATION ADR07 -002 (389 -26 -022) Sripadanna, 18524 Montpere Way (Continued to October 24, 2007 meeting): - Appeal of an Administrative Design Review approval for a remodel with partial demolition and addition to the existing one -story home located at 18524 Montpere Way. The proposal would enlarge the home by approximately 1,096 square feet (which includes a carport conversion to enclosed garage). Total proposed floor area, including garage would be 2,730 square feet. The maximum height of the proposed structure will not exceed eighteen feet (18). The maximum impervious coverage would not exceed the allowable 60% of the net site area. The lot size is 8,520 square feet and the property is located in the R- 10,000 zoning district. (Heather Bradley) 2. APPLICATION #07 -396 (517 -22 -075) Arimilli, 15400 Peach Hill Road (Continued from August 8, 2007 meeting): - The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct a new two -story single family residence, including a basement and an attached Secondary Dwelling Unit. The total floor area of P:\PC Agendas\2007\Agn 101007.doc the proposed residence and garage will be approximately 6,699 square feet. The net lot size is approximately 1.6 acres and the site is zoned R -1- 40,000. (Chris Riordan) APPLICATION #07- 126/PSP07 -0002 (386 -35 -069) Church of the Ascension, 12033 Miller Avenue /19550 Prospect Road: - The applicant requests design review for an illuminated freestanding sign in the R -1 -10 district. The high density urethane architectural foam sign will be mounted on a stone block base and painted beige with brown lettering, which will match the colors on the adjacent church buildings. The combined sign and base will be approximately five feet high and eight feet wide. The text will spell out "Church of the Ascension Roman Catholic" and will include the times of the masses. (Suzanne Thomas) DIRECTORS ITEM: - None COMMISSION ITEMS: - None COMMUNICATIONS - None ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING Wednesday, October 24, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers /Civic Theater 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (408) 868 -1269 or ctclerk@saratoga.ca.us. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102- 35.104 ADA Title II). Certificate of Posting of Agenda: I, Abby Ayende, Office Specialist for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga was posted on October 4, 2007 at the office of the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 and was available for public review at that location. The agenda is also available on the City's website at www.saratoga.ca.us If you would like to receive the Agenda's via e-mail, please send your e-mail address to plannin1Z6nisarato2a.ca.us NOTE: To view previous Planning Commission meetings anytime, go the City Video Archives at www.saratoga.ca.us :7 PAPC Agendas\2007\Agn 101007.doc \ O q� MINUTES SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 PLACE: Council Chambers /Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting Chair Hlava called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Cappello, Hlava, Kumar, Kundtz, Nagpal, Rodgers and Zhao Absent: None Staff: Director John Livingstone, Contract Planner Heather Bradley and Assistant City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES — Regular Meeting of August 22, 2007. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Nagpal, seconded by Commissioner Cappello, the Planning Commission minutes of the regular meeting of August 22, 2007, were adopted with a correction to page 24. (7 -0) APPROVAL OF MINUTES — Regular Meeting of September 12, 2007. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Nagpal, seconded by Commissioner Rodgers, the Planning Commission minutes of the regular meeting of September 12, 2007, were adopted with corrections to pages 6,7 and 9. (4- 0-0-3; Commissioners Cappello, Kumar and Kundtz abstained) ORAL COMMUNICATION There were no oral communications. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA Director John Livingstone announced that, pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on September 20, 2007. CONSENT CALENDAR There were no consent items. is SaratogaCPlaLnning Commission Minutes for September 26, 2007 Page 2 REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS Chair Hlava announced that appeals are possible for any decision made on this Agenda by filing an Appeal Application with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15- 90.050(b). PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM NO. 1 Application #07 -233 (APN 503 -24- 071/073) Sam Cloud Barn, L.P (Owner) 20640 3rd Street: The applicant requests Design Review and Variance Approval to construct a new commercial building attached to the historic Sam Cloud Hay and Feed Warehouse currently undergoing renovation. The proposed structure is three stories with a full basement. Total square footage of the addition is 7,506 square feet and the maximum height is 35 feet. The maximum building coverage is 77 percent of the site. The gross lot size is 4,187 square feet and the site is- zoned CH -1. The Variance application is necessary to allow development on a lot with a 48 percent slope. (Heather Bradley) Contract Planner Heather Bradley presented the staff report as follows: • Reported that a list of green building construction for this proposed project has been distributed this evening. Explained that.the applicant is seeking Design Review and Variance approvals for the construction of a three -story building with basement on a vacant parcel located off Td Street and�Big Basin Way. Each floor consists of 1,260 square feet with a 1,140 square foot basement. The coverage is at 50 percent and the maximum height is 30 feet. • Stated.that a. Variance is needed because the average slope of this property is greater than -30 percent. • Said that the architectural style is an early- American Pioneer building form, which matches the Sam Cloud Barn and Feed Store that is located next door. The architect has tried to match all. the materials and details found on the Sam Cloud building while adding some features such as recessed and hanging balconies. • Advised that the two buildings are separated, however, the existing staircase for the original Barn building will _extend onto this property and will require an access easement. Walkways will connect the two buildings. Said that a materials board is available. • Explained that this project is revised since the last Study Session at which the Commission saw it. The project has been discussed three times in Study Sessions and has been substantially reduced in square footage from the original proposal in May. They have separated the building from the original Sam Cloud Barn and reduced it by approximately 2,000 square feet. They have eliminated a tower and added recessed balconies to the exterior elevation, which faces the parking lot off 4th Street. By separating the buildings, they have also deleted the proposed glass wall between the two buildings. • Reported that the Heritage Preservation Commission reviewed this project in March against the Secretary of the Interior's requirements for additions to historic structures. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for September 26, 2007 Page 3 However, since this is no longer connected to the Sam Cloud Barn it is no longer considered an addition. • Stated that there has been one letter of opposition submitted by Mr. Lee, owner of Saratoga Inn. He expresses concerns with the loss of views of the Sam Cloud building and increased demand for available parking in the vicinity. • Reminded that there is no parking required for this project as the City has relaxed its parking requirement for the Village to encourage new businesses. • Added that if required to provide parking, the requirement for this new building would be approximately 20 spaces depending upon the mix of tenants. Three angled parking spaces will be provided. • Said that retail uses would be permitted on any floor of this building, as could personal service businesses. A restaurant would require issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. • Stated that the applicant would like to copy the design of signage found at the Village Square. • Said that findings can be made and recommended that the Planning Commission grant Variance and Design Review approvals with conditions. City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer offered the following edits to the draft conditions: • Condition 1 — add the word " minoe' prior to changes. • Condition 3 — add the work "minor" prior to changes. • Condition 9 — add the text, "A storm water retention plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval indicating how all storm water will be retained on site to the maximum extent feasible and incorporating the new construction and best management practices. If not all storm water can be retained on site, drainage in compliance with Condition 11 shall be in the building plan in a manner satisfactory to the Community Development Director." • Condition 12 — eliminate draft condition as it is from a previous project. • Formerly Condition 13 and now new Condition 12 — add the text, "Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant/owner shall provide an access easement with the Sam Cloud Hay and Feed Warehouse and provide language for the proposed access easement for approval by the City Attorney and Community Development Director." • Old Condition 19 and now new Condition 18 — add text, "Existing sewer lateral to be televised, if it is going to be used, to the satisfaction of the District and City." Commissioner Rodgers asked if there are conditions that need to be made permanent, such as the easement. City Attorney Jonathan Witter agreed that the easement needs to be permanent and will be recorded. However, as that easement could also be rescinded later, he recommends that the condition for an easement be made permanent. Commissioner Cappello asked if the issue raised by the owner of the Saratoga Inn is documented and part of the packet. 0 Planner Heather Bradley replied yes, it is in Attachment #4. Chair Hlava pointed out that there are also nine forms supporting the project. Saratoga Planning Commission. Minutes for September 26, 2007 Page 4 Commissioner N agpal as k ed for verification that if the parking rules were not relaxed the parking requirement for this project would be 20 spaces. Planner Heather Bradley replied yes.. She added that there is still 33,256 in area still available. Commissioner Nagpal asked if there is a provision requiring retail uses on the ground floor. Planner Heather Bradley said that this would be at the discretion of the Planning Commission as this building is now separated from Big Basin Way so it would allow for office and service uses on the first floor. Commissioner Rodgers asked for clarification for the record on Mr. Lee's contention that there are parking spaces that are privately owned. City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer said that this has been spelled out on the record. Commissioner Rodgers said that Mr. Lee claims to own the first two rows of parking. City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer said that this is not a part of the required findings. Commissioner Nagpal asked again whether retail uses are not being mandated. Planner Heather Bradley replied correct. Commissioner Rodgers asked for clarification regarding the use of the term "engineered" wood versus actual wood. Planner Heather Bradley said that the Barn used its former exterior wood on the interior and the exterior was reconstructed -of engineered wood. Commissioner Nagpal pointed out that the staff report calls out for 1,266 square feet of retail on the first floor. Planner Heather Bradley sa.id that this is an error. That is not a requirement under the zoning. City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer said that the finding should be redrafted and pointed out that Exhibit A does not show a particular mix of retail. Director John Livingstone said that the new building was just recently disconnected from the old. If they remained connected, the requirements for retail on the first floor would apply. However, the new structure is completely functional as an independent building. It is a separate parcel with a stand -alone building. Chair Hlava expressed concern with the finding requiring retail in the draft resolution. p 9 q g Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for September 26, 2007 Page 5 * City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer said that finding would need to be modified. Chair Hlava opened the public hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Mr. Craig Aubrey, Applicant: • Said he is here with Mr. Bob Hausman. • Thanked the Commission for its patience and reminded that this is the fifth meeting on this project. • Thanked staff, the Commission and Project Architect Warren Heid. • Offered to provide a project overview. • Reported that in 2005, this project started. They had two lots. The first project was to improve the Sam Cloud Barn through restoration and re- adaptation to commercial use. Now they are planning the second lot and submitted the original proposal for that lot in January 2007. The Heritage Preservation Commission reviewed the project in March and approved the development of the site. • Added that this Planning Commission conducted three study sessions in May, July and August of this year. This public hearing before the Commission tonight represents the fifth public meeting altogether on this project. • Assured that they have listened and made lots of changes to the project that he hopes to see approved tonight. • Explained that they met with neighbors individually including the Cleaners at 3d and Big Basin Way, the Harmony Day Spa, Bella Saratoga, the Nail Salon, the Thai restaurant, the jewelry store, Blue Rock Shoot and Prophecy Skin Care. They met with owners and /or retail tenants except for Mr. Lee. • Expressed appreciation for their support. • Said that they provided a data sheet on the concept of green building and said they plan to do as many as they can. He described the steps taken to preserve and reuse materials from the original Sam Cloud Barn building during its remodel. • Stated that this has been a long process and he thinks this is a better project now than in its original form. It has been reduced in size by 20 percent. They have added windows and recessed balconies, changed roofing height and increased the visual impact of the entry. • Said that they are very happy and proud of the proposed b_ uilding and hope to obtain approval this evening. Commissioner Rodgers thanked Mr. Craig Aubrey for working with the City through all of those meetings. She expressed her appreciation for that effort., Commissioner Nagpal also extended her appreciation for their participation in numerous study sessions. She reiterated her concern that there is no requirement for retail and said that she expects a certain percentage of, retail on the first floor. Mr. Craig Aubrey said that he is in commercial real estate. He added that they have not begun to market this site as of yet and there are no tenants lined up. He said that there have been some inquiries from interested retail uses. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for September 26, 2007 Page 6 Chair Hlava asked if the signs proposed for the new building are intended to be the same as for the Barn. Mr. Craig Aubrey said that they have not decided yet and can work with staff in the future. Chair Hlava said that she has real concerns about signage in the Village in that she feels the Sign Ordinance is too restrictive. She stressed the importance in finding these businesses. She said that regarding the entryway she believes that there should be landscaping included there. Mr. Craig Aubrey said he would defer this issue to their Landscape Architect, Jeff Heid. He asked Architect Warren Heid if he has any comment on this issue. Mr. Warren Heid, Project Architect, said he had talked to Jeff. It is pretty dark there in the entry and once built they will take a look at what can be put in there. He cautioned that this area is only five feet wide with minimum sun exposure. He assured they would have a better idea the .next time around. Chair Hlava said she was really concerned about garbage pick up accessibility and asked if there is enough., room to' access the garbage enclosure. _ Mr. Warren Heid said that there would be more access space than is there right now.. He assured that yes they could back in. Chair Hlava asked about new doors on the trash enclosures. Mr. Warren Heid said that they would be better than what is there right now. Chair Hlava said that plantings in pots would be sufficient for the ,entry area but they will require light and water. She asked about conditioning this as a requirement. Planner Heather Bradley said that additional potted plans in the entry could be added to the existing landscape plan. Chair Hlava said she would like that. Planner Heather Bradley said that the applicants would like to receive approval of their sign tonight. It would be located adjacent to the Sam Cloud Barn and the old bridge. Chair Hlava said she has a problem with that until it is known who the tenants might be. She said she .is reluctant to approve signage like that tonight especially as signage for the Barn is not on the agenda. Mr. Craig Aubrey said that it is important to allow the tenant to be on the sign. Another sign would be proposed on the other building. - Page 7 Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for September 26, 2007 Commissioner Rodgers asked if the new building would be accessible through the Sam Cloud Barn. Mr. Craig Aubrey said that they would be separate buildings with separate entrances. He said that they are concerned about people finding their way back there. Commissioner Rodgers asked if it would be possible to walk into the Sam Cloud Barn and walk to the back building. Mr. Craig Aubrey replied yes. Commissioner Kumar asked if there were plans to include signs at the rear of the building. Mr. Craig Aubrey said that they might but have no specific plans at this time. Commissioner Nagpal asked Mr. Craig Aubrey if he would prefer to receive a sign approval tonight. Mr. Craig Aubrey replied yes, if possible. Chair Hlava said that she could go with that request and they could come in for more signage later. Mr. Gene Zambetti: • Said that he is a commercial property owner in the Village. • Stated he is in support of this application. • Said that this project straddles two parking districts and will help create pedestrian activity. He added that between 3rd and 4t" Streets is the best area as far as potential sales tax activity. • Pointed out that the Saratoga Fire District provides fire services for this area and that should be corrected in the conditions. Commissioner Nagpal told Mr. Gene Zambetti that she is concerned about the lack of committed retail on the first floor of this project and asked him for his perspective on this issue. Mr. Gene Zambetti said that one would likely see decorator items and personal services. He added that there is lots of risk for the developer right now, as this building would be really hidden. The consumers will have to find it, which is difficult for retail. This will have to be a point of destination. It would be easier to locate retail in the Barn. Commissioner Rodgers asked Mr. Gene Zambetti if he foresees entry retail off the parking lot in the future. .Mr. Gene Zambetti said there is the possibility but the City may have to change what it allows and might have to go with some kind of franchise. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for September 26, 2007 Page 8 ,! Mr. Bob Hausman, Applicant: • Said that traffic is needed to create a tax base and generate sales tax. • Added that a balance- of the uses in the region is necessary. Existing retailers in the Village need to optimize traffic and sales. Chair Hlava closed the public hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Commissioner Nagpal: . Thanked the applicants and their team for participation in three study sessions. • Said that -she was originally uncomfortable with some elements of this project but through a reduction in size and elevation changes she is more comfortable. • Expressed appreciation for the plans for green construction where possible. • Said that nothing could go.onto this lot without a Variance so she is comfortable supporting a Variance. • Pointed out that the relaxed_ parking requirements are intended to attract new projects. • Stated that the need for retail uses is the key issue on her mind. • Agreed that foot traffic is important for retail: • Said she appreciates the efforts taken by the applicants and supports this project, as it will bring people to Saratoga to work there. Commissioner Zhao: • Said that she can make the. Variance findings. • - Expressed appreciation that recommendations have been taken and the original design modified accordingly. • -Said that. , she has no concern regarding requiring retail uses as bringing people to the Village will benefit the Village overall. It will help the existing retail. • Said she could also make Design Review findings and totally supports this project. Commissioner Rodgers said that some retail is important and requested that the applicants make an effort to recruit retail uses. Commissioner Kundtz said he too - appreciates the applicants' efforts and agreed with Commission. Zhao's comments. He said that even if the space were filled with professional services instead of retail, it would increase, foot traffic for the Village. He wished the applicants well. Commissioner Kumar: Thanked the applicants for their participation in the study sessions. The issues of bulk with the original design have dissipated and overall he is thrilled with this new structure on this vacant piece of land. • Added that the possibilities. are endless and he is not too hung up on retail there. • Stated his agreement with the staff recommendation to grant Design Review and Variance approvals. • Wished the applicants all the best. Commissioner Cappello: Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for September 26, 2007 Page 9 • Stated his agreement with what has been said. • Said that this new building is tied in to a very precious building, the Sam Cloud Barn. • Added he would love to see more retail in this new building but does not feel it is appropriate to mandate it. • Assured that market conditions and interest will work it out. • Suggested that the applicants are listening and will make an effort to obtain retail if possible. • Added that whatever happens here will be of benefit to the Village. • Said that he has no problem supporting the Variance as nothing can be built here without one so it is warranted. • Stated he can also make the Design Review findings. Commissioner Rodgers said that she is completely happy with this project and has no objection to including professional services and /or office uses here. Chair Hlava: • Said that as the Village is on a hill, without a Variance this lot. could not be built upon. • Added that this means the Variance is not a special privilege and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and /or welfare. • Echoed the thanks given to the applicants for participation in lots of study sessions. • Said that the project is now significantly smaller and a better looking project than it started. • • Supported the change to the resolution to correctly list the fire services provided by Saratoga Fire District. • Said that the easement will be made a permanent condition. • Supported the sign request too. Planner Heather Bradley: • Clarified that the new Condition 12 will be for the sign approval. • Added that the original Condition 13 will remain the requirement for an access easement as a permanent condition of approval • Said that a requirement to add entry landscaping via potted plants should be per the approval of the Community Development Director. City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer: • Suggested that the additional landscaping be included as Condition 1 to read, "as modified on Sheet L to require potted plants in the entry area." • Modified a finding to read, "This project proposes to construct a new building on site that promotes economic opportunities within the Village." • Said that signage is being approved as a part of Condition 1 as well. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Nagpal, seconded by Commissioner Kundtz, the Planning Commission granted Design Review and Variance approvals to allow the construction of a new commercial building on property located at 20640 3rd Street, with the following modifications: • Revised finding for L requiring an access easement as a permanent condition of approval; Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for September 26, 2007 Page 10 J • Remove the draft Condition 12 and create a new Condition 12 that approves signage; • Condition 1 to be modified to include planting subject to approval of the Community Development Director and signage • . Change Condition 24 to reflect the Saratoga Fire District, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Cappello, Hlava, Kumar, Kundtz, Nagpal, Rodgers and Zhao NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None DIRECTOR'S ITEMS .There were no Director's Items. COMMISSION ITEMS - Commissioner Nagpal expressed her recognition to staff for their work on the General Plan. Chair Hlava reported that there was a study session earlier this evening together with Council on the draft Blight Ordinance. The next study session on this will be held on October 24th at 5 p.m. The Commission also met yesterday regarding the Fence Ordinance, which will become a public hearing item before the Commission soon. Commissioner Rodgers: reminded that the next study session would be held with Council on October 16tH. Chair Hlava advised that she would be absent for the October 10th Planning Commission - meeting. COMMUNICATIONS There were no'Communications.Items. ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING Upon motion of Commissioner ' Nagpal, seconded by Commissioner Zhao, Chair Hlava adjourned the meeting at approximately 8:16 p.m. to the next Regular Planning Commission meeting of -October 10, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. MINUTES PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY: Corinne A. Shinn, Minutes Clerk • i. • Item 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Heather Bradley ��? Contract Planner `v MEETING DATE: October 10, 2007 SUBJECT: Request for a Continuance Appeal Application No. APPC07 -0001 of Administrative Design Review Approval Application No. ADR07 -002 18524 Montpere Way, Saratoga, California The appellant has requested a continuance due to an out of town commitment on October 10`h, 2007. The appellant is allowed one request for a continuance at which time the item is scheduled for the next available Public Hearing. Therefore this item will be schedule for the Planning Commission meeting of October 24`h, 2007. The appellant has the opportunity to request a second continuance, however this must be accompanied by a fee of $250.00 and the Planning Commission has the discretion to grant or deny this second request for a continuance. If the continuance is denied the appeal hearing will be held, the staff report will be presented, public. testimony will be received and the Planning Commission will render a decision. The Planning Commission decision on an appeal of an Administrative Design Review application is final and not subject to further appeal to the City Council. • • Heather Bradley From: David Ho (taweihoho @yahoo.com) Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 11:28 AM To: Heather Bradley Subject: Request for a continuance of the public hearing #ADR07 -002 Hi Heather, Page 1 of 1 I would like to request for a continuance of the public hearing ( #ADR07 -002). As you said over the phone, since this is the first request, it will be proved by the Planning Commission and it will be moved onto the next meeting, which is held on Oct. 24th. If there is any other information, please do let me know. Thanks. Cheers! David 9/26/2007 Item 2 � REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No./Location: 07- 396/15400 Peach Hill Road Type of Application: Design Review for a New Two -Story Single - Family Residence Applicant/Owner: Rao and Sita Arimilli (Owner /Applicant) nn Staff Planner: Christopher A. Riordan, AICP, Senior Planner- Date: October 10, 2007 APN: 517 -22 -072 Department Head: John Livingstone, )UCP, Director • N rCti n stY _y ire { 500' ( C - R ,_ ..r 1 � p Subject: 15400 Peach Hill Road •+ a APN: 517 -22 -072 500' Radius diA YY \ I `A� r, n Y� ewe �, f � `' %+ i.m `°�`• .. 15400 PEACH HILL ROAD • Application No. 07- 396/15400 Peach, Hill Road PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Background This project was initially reviewed by the Planning Commission (Commission) at their meeting of August 8, 2007 and continued to a date uncertain. The applicant was requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP)- to construct a 29.5 foot tall single - family home. The Commission recommended that the mass of the project be reduced and its maximum height lowered to 26 feet. The Commission was having difficulty making the required findings to support the applicant's request for a CUP for the single - family residence to exceed the 26 foot height limit based on the architectural purity of the proposed French Eclectic design. Current Project The revised project is a request for Design Review Approval to construct a proposed 6,699 square foot, 26 feet tall two story single- family residence on a vacant lot. (The Project). A CUP is no longer required as the applicant has reduced the height of the proposed residence from 29.5 feet to 26 feel. The project will also have a lower level/basement to include a four car garage and a Secondary Dwelling Unit. The net lot size is approximately 1.6 -acres and the site is zoned R -1- 40,000 (Single - family Residential). Zoning Code Section 15- 45.060 states any new multi -story structure or whenever, as a result of proposed construction, reconstruction or expansion, the gross floor area of all structures on a site will exceed 6,000 square -feet Design Review approval is required by the Planning Commission. The proposal consists of a new multi -story structure and exceeds 6,000 square -feet; therefore, Planning Commission review is required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the Design Review application with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. Staff is not recommending any permanent conditions of approval. • 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY: Application filed: 06/07/07 Application complete: 07/20/07 Notice published: 09/26/07 Mailing completed: 09/21/07 Posting completed: 10/04/07 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Background This project was initially reviewed by the Planning Commission (Commission) at their meeting of August 8, 2007 and continued to a date uncertain. The applicant was requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP)- to construct a 29.5 foot tall single - family home. The Commission recommended that the mass of the project be reduced and its maximum height lowered to 26 feet. The Commission was having difficulty making the required findings to support the applicant's request for a CUP for the single - family residence to exceed the 26 foot height limit based on the architectural purity of the proposed French Eclectic design. Current Project The revised project is a request for Design Review Approval to construct a proposed 6,699 square foot, 26 feet tall two story single- family residence on a vacant lot. (The Project). A CUP is no longer required as the applicant has reduced the height of the proposed residence from 29.5 feet to 26 feel. The project will also have a lower level/basement to include a four car garage and a Secondary Dwelling Unit. The net lot size is approximately 1.6 -acres and the site is zoned R -1- 40,000 (Single - family Residential). Zoning Code Section 15- 45.060 states any new multi -story structure or whenever, as a result of proposed construction, reconstruction or expansion, the gross floor area of all structures on a site will exceed 6,000 square -feet Design Review approval is required by the Planning Commission. The proposal consists of a new multi -story structure and exceeds 6,000 square -feet; therefore, Planning Commission review is required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the Design Review application with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. Staff is not recommending any permanent conditions of approval. • 2 • • • Application No. 07- 396115400 Peach Hill Road Zoning: STAFF ANALYSIS R -1- 40,000 General Plan Designation: RVLD (Residential Very Low Density) Measure G: Not applicable Parcel Size: 76,535 sq. ft. (gross) and 49,423 sq. ft. (net - 28% reduction in lot area for slope adjustment) Average Site Slope: 18.9% Grading Required: 1,586 CY of cut, 869 CY of fill, 717 CY of export. (350 CY of cut to construct the basement is not included) Prniect Data: Proposal Code Requirements Lot Coverage: Maximum Allowable = 35% Building 5,692 sq. ft. Covered Porches 1,778 sq. ft. 24,028 sq ft. Patios/Walkways 619 sq. ft. Driveway 5,783 sq. ft. TOTAL PROPOSED 13,872 sq. ft. 20% Floor Area: Maximum Allowable — Residence 5,673 sq. ft. [6,200 sq. ft. + 10% increase Basement where the finished 1,026 sq. ft. (620 sq. ft.) = 6,820 sq. ft.] floor is greater than 42 inches Deed restriction of second above grade: dwelling unit for rental to TOTAL PROPOSED 6,699 sq. ft. below market rate households Minimum Requirement Setbacks: 1 -story 2 -story 1 -story 2 -story Front (south) 42 ft. 60 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. Rear (west) 59 ft. 63 ft. 50 ft. 60 ft. Left Side (east) 117 ft. 117 ft. 20 ft. 25 ft. Right Side north 60 ft. 125 ft. 20 ft. 25 ft. Height: Lowest Elev. Pt. 497 ft. Maximum Height = Highest Elev. Pt. 514 ft. 531.5 (26 Feet) Average Elev. Pt. 505.5 ft. Topmost Pt. 531.5 ft. (26 ft. Second Dwelling Unit: Located in Basement 1,164 sq. ft. Minimum 400 sq. ft. Maximum 1,200 sq. ft. Application No. 07- 396/15400 Peach Hill Road Materials and Colors: Materials and colors will include a stucco exterior finish with stone accents on the architectural projections of the front fagade as well as on the lower level. All windows, doors, and shutters will be brown stained wood. Decorative wrought iron railings will be installed on the window above the front entrance as well as the terrace that is accessible from the family "and living rooms as well as the kitchen. Brick columns will be used as roof supports for all of the porches and terraces. The roof will be composed of two - piece clay roof tiles with an "earth blend" tone. The colors and materials board that is on file with'the Community Development Department will be present at the public hearing. Environmental Determination: The - proposal is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single - family residences. Project Discussion Project Description The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct a 6,699 square foot two -story single - family home, which includes a 5,673 main floor and a 1,026 square foot lower level. A portion of the lower level (3,421 square feet) qualifies as a basement and is not included in the floor area as the vertical distance from grade to the finished floor directly above is less than or equal to 42 inches. The maximum height of the proposed residence will be 26.0 feet tall and will be constructed on a vacant lot. The applicant has identified the architectural style of the proposed residence as "Tuscon" as the design would contain -architectural elements indicative of homes found in the Italian countryside. Such elements include a stucco and stone exterior finish, covered porches flanked by columns, arched and square windows, wood shutters, wrought iron railings, recessed front entry, a lower level loggia, exposed rafter tails, and a hipped "barrel tile" roof. Secondary Dwelling Unit The proposed project will include a 1,164 square foot Secondary Dwelling Unit located -in the basement. Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 56.030(d) allows a one -time ten percent increase in site coverage and allowable floor area if an applicant agrees to a deed restriction restricting the rental of a second unit to below market rate (BMR) households. The United States Department° of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) publishes an annual list of income limits for Santa Clara County households that would qualify as lower (80 %), very - low "(50 %), or extremely -low (30 %) income households that would be eligible to rent a "BMR housing unit. All percentages are based on the 2007 Santa Clara County -median income level of $94,500. As an example, a couple with a combined yearly income of $67,900 (80% of the median) would be eligible to rent the proposed secondary dwelling unit. 0 • • • Application No. 07- 396/15400 Peach Hill Road. A condition has been added to the project requiring the deed restriction to be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. The provision of the BMR second unit would allow the applicant to construct an additional 620 square feet of floor area on the site above the maximum allowable floor area of 6,200 square feet for an allowable floor area of 6,820 square feet. The total floor of the proposed project is 6,699 square feet. The parking requirements for a secondary dwelling unit are a minimum of one off - street parking space within a garage. The garage requirement may be waived if the second dwelling unit is deed restricted. Nonetheless, the project will include a four -car garage thus meeting the parking requirements for both the main and the secondary dwelling unit. Neighbor Correspondence The applicant has shown the revised project plans to neighbors as indicated in the attached Neighbor Notification Forms (Attachment 5). No negative comments have been received at the time of the writing of this Staff Report. One neighbor had expressed concerns about the previous design during the August 8, 2007 Commission meeting. The neighbor was concerned that the project would be too large and may be visible from his property. He also stated that he did not believe that the design was architecturally pure enough to warrant the granting of a CUP for additional height. The applicant .met with the neighbor in the days .following the Commission meeting. The applicant presented the revised plans to the neighbor and. also helped him locate the project site as viewed from his property. The neighbor expressed satisfaction with the revised design by signing a Neighbor Notification Form. Geotechnical Clearance JF Consulting prepared a Geotechnical Investigation for the proposed project,_ dated June 12, 2007, which was reviewed by the City's Geotechnical Consultant. As conditioned, the project has received geotechnical clearance to proceed. Trees There are 18 trees on the site potentially impacted by the proposed construction. The project is proposing to remove five of these trees including one Deodar cedar, one Arizona cypress, two Austrian pines, and one multi -trunk coast live oak. The City Arborist has determined that all but the coast live oak are in fair or poor health and should be replaced with new trees. The City Arborist has recommended that replacement trees be valued at a minimum of $7,960. This value would equate to the planting of sixteen 24" box trees or five 36" and one 24" box tree. The landscape plan indicates that 18 new 24" box trees are to be planted on the site. At least four of these trees must be native species. 5 Application No. 07- 396/15400 Peach Hill Road Energy Efficiency The applicant's proposed energy efficiency techniques will include energy conserving measures such as an "in 'floor" hydronic heating system. Other energy saving measures will include upgraded floor, wall, and ceiling insulation and a photo voltaic (solar energy) system to provide the majority of the power for the residence. General Plan Findings The proposed project is consistent with the following General Plan Policies. Conservation Element Policy 6.0 - Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. Proposed building materials that face the street would include natural materials such as clay tile roofing, genuine stone, and wood windows, doors and trim. All exterior building colors will be muted to blend in to the natural surroundings of the site. The visual impact of the project as viewed from the street is reduced and the rural atmosphere of the area would be enhanced by the 42 foot front setback from the street and because the majority of the residence is 18' -6" in height. In addition, the proposal is well under the impervious coverage allowed for the parcel. Land Use Element Goal 13 -The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the findings required for Design Approval. The home is well designed and is not visually massive and the architectural details and features and the use of natural materials compliment the Tucson architectural style. The design will not adversely impact the privacy of the adjacent neighbors. Land Use Element Policy 5.0 -The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the following Findings required for Design Approval. Design Review Findings The proposed project is consistent with all the following Design Review findings stated in Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.080: (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the proposed home will not unreasonably interfere with neighboring views or privacy in that it will be located on an approximately 1.8 gross acre site with surrounding parcels also in excess of an acre. The proposed residence would only be visible from the home across the street and the home to the left that is screened by existing vegetation and new proposed trees would provide additional screening. Behind the proposed building the site slopes down to a drainage channel and the dense landscaping in this area blocks any offsite views. The parcel to the right is vacant. The building is placed toward the front of the lot thereby providing increased setbacks than the minimum required by the Municipal Code. on • Application No. 07- 396/15400 Peach Hill Road This finding may be made in the affirmative in that (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. g y the site is covered with native grasses and trees. The building has been located on the site in an effort to minimize its impact on existing trees. Five trees will be removed for the construction of the building and driveway. All other trees potentially impacted by construction will be protected by tree fencing. The remaining trees in both the front and side yards will be incorporated into the formal landscaping. The area of the site behind the building will not be landscaped and will remain in a natural state. (e) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that there are no heritage trees located on the site. The project will affect one native tree, a coast live oak that the applicant is replacing with new trees. All other trees on site will be protected by fencing during construction. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the applicant is proposing a residence with a wide building footprint to decrease the perception of height and bulk while placing below grade the garage and some of the living space. Proposed exterior materials would include both stucco and natural stone. A neutral earth -tone color pallet will be used for the stucco, window trim, doors, and roofing materials. To further reduce the perception of bulk the proposed project would be well articulated and detailed and will include varying rooflines, covered porches, projecting architectural elements, arched wood windows, and brick columns. (e) Compatible bulk and height. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that although the proposed home would be 26 feet tall, the varying rooflines, architectural detailing, and the mix of exterior materials would minimize the visual perception of bulk. The increased height would not have a negative impact on neighboring lots given the large setbacks and existing and proposed vegetative screening. (f) Current grading and erosion control methods. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the applicant has submitted a grading and drainage plan, which incorporates appropriate grading and erosion control methods; and the proposal shall conform to the City's current grading and erosion control standards. (g) Design policies and techniques. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views. 7 Application No. 07- 396/15400 Peach Hill Road Staff Recommendation Staffs recommends- the Planning Commission find this Application exempt from CEQA and. approve the application for Design Review with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. Attachments: 1. Resolution of Approval for Design Review 2. Approved minutes from the August 8, 2007 Planning Commission meeting 3. Letter from the applicant. .4. City Arborist Report, dated June 18, 2007 5. Neighbor review letters 6. Affidavit of mailing notices, public hearing notice, and copy of mailing labels for project notification 7. - Newspaper public hearing notice 8. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A" 3 • • 6 • Attachment 1 RESOLUTION NO. Application No. 07 -299 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Arimilli;15400 Peach Hill Road APN 517 -22 -072 WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review to construct a two -story, 26 feet tall, single - family residence on a vacant lot in the R -1- 40,000 zone district. The net lot size is approximately 1.6- acres; and .WHEREAS, Zoning Code Section 15- 45.060 states any new multi -story structure or whenever, as a result of the proposed construction, reconstruction or expansion, the gross floor area of all structures on the site will exceed 6,000 square -feet Design Review approval is required by the Planning Commission. The proposal consists of a new multi -story structure and exceeds 6,000 square -feet; therefore, Planning Commission review is required prior to issuance of building permits; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, The proposal is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, . "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures' Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single - family residences in an urbanized area and; . WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Design Review, and is consistent with the following General Plan Policies: Conservation Element Policy 6.0 - Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. Proposed building materials that face the street would include natural materials such as clay tile roofing, genuine stone, and wood windows,: doors and trim. All exterior building colors will be muted to blend in to the natural surroundings of the site. The visual impact of the project as viewed from the street is reduced and the rural atmosphere of the area would be enhanced by the 42 foot front setback from the street and because the majority of the residence is 18' -6" in height. In addition, the proposal is well under the impervious coverage allowed for the parcel. Land Use Element Goal 13 -The City shall use the design review process. to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the findings. required for Design Approval. The home is well designed and is not visually massive and the architectural • Application No. 07- 396/15400 Peach Hill Road 0 details and features and the use of natural materials compliment the Tucson architectural style. The design will not adversely impact the privacy of the adjacent neighbors. Land Use Element Policy 5.0 -The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the following Findings required for Design Approval. WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Design Review approval, and the following findings have been determined: (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the proposed home will not unreasonably interfere with neighboring views or privacy in that it will be located on an approximately 1.8 gross acre site with surrounding parcels also, in excess of an acre. The proposed residence would only be visible from the home across the street and the home to the left that is screened by existing vegetation and new proposed trees would provide additional screening. Behind the proposed building the site slopes down to a drainage channel and the dense landscaping in this area blocks any offsite views. The parcel to the right is vacant. The building is placed toward the front of the lot thereby providing increased setbacks than the minimum required by the Municipal Code. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the site is covered with native grasses and trees. The building has been located on the site in an effort to minimize its impact on existing trees. Five trees will be removed for the construction of the building and driveway. All other trees potentially impacted by construction will be protected by tree fencing. The remaining trees in both the front and side yards will be incorporated into the formal landscaping. The area of the site behind the building will not be landscaped and will remain in a natural state. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that there are no heritage trees located on the site. The project-will affect one native tree, a coast live oak that the applicant will replace with new trees. All other trees on site will be protected by fencing during construction. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulb This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the applicant is proposing a residence with a wide building footprint to decrease the perception of height and bulk while placing below grade the garage and some of the living space. Proposed exterior materials would include both stucco and natural stone. A neutral earth -tone color pallet will be used for the stucco, window trim, doors, and roofing materials. To further reduce the perception of bulk the proposed project would be well articulated and detailed and will include varying rooflines, covered porches, projecting architectural elements, arched wood windows, and brick columns. 1.0 (e) Compatible bulk and height. This finding may be made in the. affirmative in that although the proposed home would be 26 feet tall, the varying rooflines, architectural detailing, and the mix of exterior materials would minimize the visual perception of 2 Application No. 07- 396/15400 Peach Hill Road bulk. The increased height would not have a negative impact on neighboring lots given the large setbacks and existing and proposed vegetative screening. 0 (f) Current grading and erosion control methods. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the applicant has submitted a grading and drainage plan, which incorporates appropriate grading and erosion control methods; and the proposal shall conform to the City's current grading and erosion control standards. (g) Design policies and techniques. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views. Now, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the application for Design Review approval is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: PERMANENT CONDITONS OF APPROVAL — None CURRENT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL CONDITIONS — COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. The development shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A" date stamped September 4, 2007, incorporated by reference. All changes to the approved plans must be submitted i w n riting with plans showing the changes and are subject to the Community Development Director's approval. 2. The project shall utilize materials illustrated on a materials board dated October, 1, 2007. 3. The following shall be required and/or included as to the plans submitted to the Building Division for the building plan check review process: a. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans incorporating this Resolution as a separate plan page. _ b. The following note shall be included: "A maximum of one wood - burning fireplace is permitted and it shall be equipped with a gas starter. All other fireplaces shall be gas burning." . c. The. following note shall be -included verifying building setback: "Prior to foundation inspection by the City,. the Licensed Land Surveyor of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per approved plans. 3 Application No. 07- 396/15400 Peach Hill Road 4. A storm water retention plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval indicating how all storm water will be retained on -site, and incorporating the New Development and Construction - Best Management Practices. If all storm water cannot be retained on -site due to topographic, soils or other constraints, an explanatory note shall be provided on the plan. 5. Landscape plan shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff, promote surface infiltration and minimize use of fertilizers and pesticides that can contribute to water pollution. 6. To the. extent feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. 7. To the extent feasible, pest resistant landscaping plants shall be used throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape areas. 8. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. native trees shrubs and ground cover, if applicable, shall be retained and 9. Existing gr pp , incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. 10. Staff shall not approve downgrading to the exterior appearance of the approved residence. Downgrades may include, but are not limited to, garage doors, architectural detailing, stonework, columns, shutters, driveway materials, or similar items. Any exterior changes to approved plans resulting in a downgrade shall require filing an additional application and fees for review by the Planning Commission as a modification to approved plans. Any other exterior changes to the approved plans, which are not deemed a downgrade by staff, shall require a Zoning Clearance issued by the Community Development Director with payment of appropriate fees. 11. All processing fees, in the form of deposit accounts on file with the community development department, shall be reconciled with a minimum $500.00 surplus balance at all times. In the event that the balance is less than $500.00, all staff work on the project shall cease until the balance is restored to a minimum $500.00. 12. The applicant shall record a deed restriction for the secondary dwelling unit that restricts it so that it may only be rented to below market rate households, prior to Building Permit issuance. 0 13. Front yard landscaping shall be installed prior to final occupancy inspection. rd Application No. 07- 396/15400 Peach Hill Road CITY ARBORIST • 14. All recommendations contained in the City Arborist Report dated June 18, 2007, shall be followed 15. Tree protective measures, as. specified by the City Arborist, shall be installed and inspected by Staff prior to issuance of City.Permits. 16. Prior to issuance of City Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City, in a form acceptable to the Community Development Director, security equivalent to $95,560 to guarantee the maintenance and preservation of trees. 17. The City Arborist shall inspect the site to verify compliance with tree protective measures. The bond shall be released after the planting of required replacement trees, a favorable site inspection by the City Arborist, and payment of any outstanding Arborist fees. FIRE DISTRICT 18. Applicant shall comply with all Santa Clara County Fire Department conditions. PUBLIC WORKS • 19. The Project Geotechnical Consultant shall review and approve all geotechnical aspects of the final development plans (i.e., site preparation and grading, site . drainage 'improvements and design parameters. for foundations) to ensure that the plans, specifications and details accurately reflect the consultants' recommendations. The results of the plan review shall be summarized by the Project Geotechnical Consultant in a letter and submitted to the City Engineer for review prior to issuance of permits for project construction. 20. The Project Geotechnical Engineer shall inspect, test (as needed), and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project construction. The inspections shall include, but not necessarily be limited to: site preparation and grading, site surface and subsurface drainage improvements; retaining wall excavation, and foundation construction, prior to placement of fill, steel and concrete. The results of these inspections and the as-built conditions of the project shall be described by the Project Geotechnical Engineer in a letter(s) and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to Final (as- built) Project Approval. 21. The owner (applicant) shall pay any outstanding fees associated with the City Geotechnical Consultant's review of the project prior to Zone Clearance. 22. The owner (applicant) shall enter into agreement holding the City of Saratoga harmless from any claims or liabilities caused by or arising out of soil or slope instability, slides, slope failure or other soil related and/or erosion related conditions. [i • Application No. 07- 396/15400 Peach Hill Road CITY ATTORNEY 23. Owner and Applicant agree to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. Section 2. A Building Permit must be issued and construction commenced within 36 months from the date of adoption of this Resolution or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15 -90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 10th day of October 2007 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Joyce Hlava Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: John F. Livingstone, AICP Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms 0 Application No. 07- 396115400 Peach Hill Road and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date • • 7 • Attachment2., Ii Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for August 8, 2007 Page 1. • MINUTES SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: Wednesday, August 8, 2007 PLACE: Council Chambers /Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM NO. 3 APPLICATION #07 -396 (517 -22 -075) Arimilli, 15400 Peach Hill Road: The applicant requests Design Review Approval to construct a new two -story single - family residence, including a basement and an attached secondary dwelling unit, and a request for a height exception to allow the project to exceed the maximum 26 -foot height limit by 3.5 feet for a total height of .29.5 feet. The total, floor area of the proposed residence and garage will be approximately 6,713 square feet. The net lot size is approximately 1.6 acres and the site is zoned R -1- 40,000. (Chris Riordan) Chair Hlava announced that a Study Session was previously held on this application. Senior Planner Chris Riordan presented the staff report as follows: • Advised that the applicant is seeking Design Review and Use Permit approvals to allow the construction of a 6,700 square foot, two -story single - family residence with basement. • Added that a 783 square foot secondary dwelling unit would be included in the basement. • Reported that recordation of a Deed Restriction on the secondary dwelling unit as a BMR ,(Below Market Rate) unit allows an additional 10 percent increase in allowed square footage. • Said that the maximum height proposed is 29.5 feet. • Described the.project site as a vacant lot. • ..Explained that a Use Permit is required to allow a residence to have a height that is in excess of 26 feet. The Use Permit allows the extra height only in order to meet architectural style purity. • Reminded that this Commission held -a Study Session on this project in July. • Said that the_ applicant has provided additional written description and plans on his proposed architectural style, French Country Manor. • Listed the proposed project materials as including tan stucco, wood doors and shutters, copper roof and drain pipes over the bay window and slate roof tiles in an earth color. • Said that staff recommends that the Commission find this project to be Categorically Exempt under CEQA and approve the Use Permit and Design Review applications. Commissioner Zhao asked about the Deed Restriction and whether this owner would have to rent out their second unit. What happens if they do not rent it out? Chair Hlava explained that the owner does not have to rent the unit out. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for August 8, 2007 Page 2 Commissioner Rodgers asked if the proposed 1,236 cubic yards of grading is not more than permitted. Planner Chris Riordan said that grading is limited only in the Hillside zoning district. Chair Hlava opened the public hearing for Agenda Item No. 3. Mr. Marty Oakley, Project Designer /Builder: • Thanked staff for their efforts, particularly Chris Riordan. • Thanked the Commission for conducting a Study Session a couple of weeks ago. • Said that the Study Session was important and necessary as it gave the Planning Commission the chance to understand his project and him to understand the Commission's concerns. • Said that he has tried to deal with the issues raised and to prove the purity of the proposed architectural style. • Explained that he has since located two additional resources. That material has been provided in their plan. • Stated his availability for any questions. Commissioner Rodgers thanked Mr. Marty Oakley for the additional research material provided. She pointed out that it appears that he has pulled from two architectural styles, French Country and French Eclectic. Mr. Marty Oakley said that there are many of the same elements in both styles but his is a pure French Country style. He said that all elements, materials and degree of design are outlined in the three different resources. He added that a 7 and 12 roof pitch is not that steep. Commissioner Nagpal: • Said that it is important for Mr. Marty Oakley to pick an architectural style and find what makes that style architecturally pure, including roof height. • Added that she wants to hear more about other arguments and /or elements that define the purity of the style, including roof height. Mr. Marty Oakley said that the rendering shows dormer windows, slate roofing, stucco and stone, recessed windows and the brick headers above the windows. He said all these elements are spelled out in the resource materials and all are clearly shown on the elevation. Commissioner Cappello said that it appears that there are elements to the French Eclectic style. Other elements are not included in this design. He said that it appears that Mr. Marty Oakley has only highlighted some of them. Mr. Marty Oakley pointed out that a designer does not have to use every element possible to an architectural style in a particular home. Commissioner Cappello cautioned that Code stipulates an allowance of additional height if that height adheres to an architectural style. If the style is eclectic, how can a design adhere to that standard? Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for August 8, 2007 Page 3 Mr. Marty Oakley said that it represents a combination of different styles. Eclectic styles include a number of different elements. Commissioner Cappello said if that is so why is an additional three feet in height for the roof indeed required here. Mr. Marty Oakley said that the steeper pitch roof he proposes is required to meet that style. Commissioner Cappello said that the Code section to allow additional height is not just to result in an attractive home but also to meet strict architectural style requirements. Mr. Marty .Oakley said that he believes he has proven the purity by picking elements of the chosen architectural style. Chair Hlava: • Explained to Mr. Marty Oakley that members of this Commission are saying that eclectic is not a pure style. • Pointed out that she sees French Eclectic listed as a specific identified style with sub- types. Commissioner Nagpal said .that is where she started. She asked Mr. Marty Oakley to help the Commission make the connection. Commissioner Kundtz asked Mr. Marty Oakley to point to one specific style from the resource. Mr. Marty Oakley pointed to #4 on the bottom of the page, the one without the round turret. He added that none are 100 percent of what he is trying to create. He added that there is one on -the next page that offers more continuity with his design. He pointed out that he went to numerous bookstores and libraries to research. Commissioner Rodgers said that the guide refers to eclectic as drawing elements from different styles into one style - rather than being a consistent style by itself. Mr. Marty Oakley: • Said that this is not correct. He said that the home is designed from the floor up. The exterior is designed before you`do anything. • Added that this property dictated what he could do as far as floor plan. This design is the most conducive for this property. • Said that he has-to have the steep pitch roof to make this work. If not, he would have to do a Tuscan style home. Suggested that the reason for the Code exception on height is to allow steeper pitched roofs. . Commissioner Rodgers: • Said that a large part of this house's footprint is at the 30 -foot height. • Stated that in the French style, each region has its own style. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for August 8, 2007 Page 4 Opined that this house doesn't draw from any specific one to prove it is .pure rather than just large. • Pointed out that the Commission would be setting precedent with this decision. Mr. Marty Oakley said that he tried to create a varied roofline using good design so that it is not top heavy but rather proportionate. He cautioned that they are looking at a one - dimensional drawing that does not clearly depict the varying plate heights and rooflines. Chair Hlava asked if the listed element of outward flaring eaves is incorporated? Mr. Marty Oakley replied yes. If you look at the color rendering, the flared roof does exist at the plate line where it flares to 4 and 12. Chair Hlava asked if recessed windows are utilized? Mr. Marty Oakley pointed out six recessed windows on the front elevation alone, including a bath, the elliptical top window and dining room. The library and master bedroom windows are recessed. He said that recessed windows give a real thick wall look and shadow. Chair Hlava asked about the use of a prominent chimney in the front elevation and /or more than one as called for in his architectural style. Mr. Marty Oakley said that Saratoga allows only one wood burning fireplace. Although there are other fireplaces in the house, they are gas and do not include chimneys but rather have flues. He added that he could incorporate false chimneys if the Commission so desires. Commissioner Rodgers said that the chimney seems to be stucco. Mr. Marty Oakley replied yes. Commissioner Rodgers asked about use of stone or brick. Mr. Marty Oakley said that the facade walls include real stone and he has taken a brick that compliments that stone and added it to the window. Commissioner Rodgers said that several styles are represented. She said that the other problem is that a large area is at the 29 -foot height and includes 10 -foot ceilings. Mr. Marty Oakley said that the house has 15, 12 an 10 foot ceiling heights. Commissioner Rodgers said that this leaves room to develop the attic irAo living space in the future. Mr. Marty Oakley reminded that he is not proposing a two -story or an attic space. 4PDr Jack Connelly, Resident on Hume Drive: Said that he lives to the east of the project. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for August 8, 2007 Page 5 • Said that he would like. to see this house designed at a maximum of 26 feet. • Informed that he was never asked to review the project plans. • Suggested that this project is playing loose with architectural purity. • Stated that he had no idea that this was going to be a commercial project. • Opined that this project appears to push limits. • Asked the Commission to limit this home to 26 feet in height or it would look like a hotel. • Reported that he got notice of this evening's hearing but had no chance to look and /or sign off on the proposed plans. Commissioner Nagpal asked Dr. Jack Connelly if he could see the story poles. Dr. Jack. Connelly said that there is no string attaching the poles together. Chair Hlava: • Explained to Dr. Jack Connelly that basements don't count against FAR. • Added that if a second unit 'is Deed Restricted as a BMR unit the applicant gets the advantage to build a larger unit. • Informed him that allowing 'a density bonus is required by the State to encourage these second units. • Pointed out that the unit in this house is not likely to ever be rented out. Commissioner Nagpal pointed out that the house is 5,692 square feet and the basement 1,021 square feet. Planner Chris Riordan explained that a portion of the basement is exempt while another portion of the basement that is a daylight basement is counted against square footage. Thus out of a 3,418 square foot basement, 1,021 square feet is counted in the FAR. Ms. Amy Newmark, Resident on Austin, expressed concern about having BMR housing in her neighborhood. Chair Hlava: • Reiterated. that allowing second units is the State's effort to have low- income housing stock available in a community. • Pointed out that in this community, someone earning between $60,000 and $80,000 counts as lower income. • Added that if the unit is deed restricted as a BMR unit, the owner gets bonus square footage. • Said that this does not mean that second unit is ever rented out. • Suggested that in this case the likelihood of the second unit being rented out is not great. Access is through the garage. The. unit is pretty small and consists of a nook, kitchen, bath, closed and contains the sauna for the house. Director John Livingstone said that second units used to require a Use Permit. State law changed the rules of approving second units. These second units are now allowed by right. The City is only looking at the design and not the right for inclusion of the second unit itself. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for August 8, 2007 Page 6 Commissioner Rodgers added that a parent, gardener, nanny, etc could use the second unit. 9 p �9 Y Mr. Marty Oakley asked if Dr. Jack Connelly is located within 500 feet. Chair Hlava replied yes. He was included on the noticing list. Commissioner Nagpal asked Mr. Marty Oakley how they contacted neighbors. Mr. Marty Oakley said that they met with four adjoining neighbors. Mr. Arimilli, Project Owner, said that he had met with every adjacent property owner and was surprised by the opposition expressed this evening by Dr. Jack Connelly. Mr. Marty Oakley said that they installed the story poles as instructed by staff. Chair Hlava closed the public hearing for Agenda Item No. 3 Commissioner Cappello: • Reiterated that exceptions for height are only to be granted to meet architectural purity. • Said that in this design there seems to be a lot of elements that can be included or excluded. • Said that there is no strong evidence that this additional height is required to meet architectural purity. • Advised that he struggles with this height exception and is currently on the fence about supporting it. Commissioner Rodgers: • Announced that she cannot meet the Design Review and Use Permit findings. • Said that 26 -foot height is what is allowed as a maximum height under the standard ordinance. An increase in height up to a maximum of 30 feet is allowed by exception only to achieve architectural design purity. • Stated that she struggles with the French Eclectic style as it is not always a cohesive whole or pure. • Added that purity is what this Commission is looking for. • Said that she has trouble with Design Review findings on bulk. The house is right on Peach Hill Road and is not compatible in bulk and height. • Said that there is a lot of roof expanse. • Compared this project to the one earlier this evening. That house was setback 80 feet. This house is set back 40 feet. • Said that this house imposes on the neighbors with a very large footprint and creates a bulk and incompatibility problem with the neighborhood. • Advised that she cannot vote in favor at this time as the Use Permit findings cannot be met. • Said that she is troubled that no landscaping plan was submitted and with the incomplete story poles. She added that inclusion of adequate story poles is her pet peeve or cause Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for August 8, 2007 Page 7 and she likes to see full story poles to be able to see a new home from the neighbors' yards or from the valley. • Added.that she has a hard time conceptualizing without that visual aide to help. • Reiterated her concern that there is room upstairs for another, room to be added in the attic and there is natural light already available in that space with the proposed windows. Commissioner Zhao. advised that her husband has worked with Mr. Marty Oakley in the past and she questioned whether she- should deliberate on this application. Director John Livingstone advised that this might be considered a grey area and up to Commissioner Zhao's discretion. Acting -City Attorney Bill Parkin said that while Commissioner Zhao may or may not have a conflict, she might be more comfortable recusing and leaving the chambers. He noted for the record that the deliberations had just begun. Commissioner Zhao advised that she would so recuse herself as a result of her husband's past professional affiliation with the applicant and departed the dais and chambers for the remainder of the hearing. Commissioner _Ku Offered the proposition to Mr. Marty Oakley to continue this item. Said that Mr. Marty Oakley-has worked long and hard and created a great design. Cautioned that he struggles with the notion of eclectic and purity and getting the two to meet. _ • Suggested giving the applicant the opportunity to speak with other neighbors and- put in more complete -story poles in order for this Commission to give a better- informed decision. - Commissioner Nagpal: • Said,that the Commission is here to make projects work. Some are more challenging than others. • Reported that she is currently on the fence on this request. Agreed that fundamentally this is a nice'design and she has seen other similar architecture that kept to the maximum of 26 feet in height. • Reiterated that the discussion has to be the purity of architectural design. • Said that this Commission'has the formidable task of establishing purity. • Said that she finds there to be a disconnect between the proposal and houses depicted /outlined on the architectural, resources. • Advised that she cannot make the purity findings at this time. • Said that she is. 'Willing to put time and effort to get it to a happy medium. Suggested that topography did not help here. The two previous height exception approvals had topography that lessened impacts. Chair Hlava: • Said that she is coming from a different perspective. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for August 8, 2007 Page 8 • Said that this design is a French Country Design and would look better with a higher pitched roof. • Added that it is so big and visible from Peach Hill Road. • Stated that she had a hard time with perception and compatibility of bulk. • Described this as a huge large house on the flat top part of the lot. This is a very big house to put there. • Informed that she has a harder time with Design Review findings more so than the height issue. • Said she is not sure if the applicant prefers more discussion at a future meeting or an up- or -down vote tonight. Mr. Marty Oakley said that it is unfair to compare his house with the one considered earlier this evening. He questioned whether the point is not to design beautiful structure? Commissioner Kundtz said that it is not the issue that the house is visible but it's the issue of allowing additional height. Mr. Marty Oakley said that the earlier house doesn't require additional height. He added that this is a 1.6 -acre lot with a 200 -foot wide frontage. Chair Hlava asked Mr. Marty Oakley if he wants to continue to another Study Session or receive a vote tonight. Mr. Marty Oakley: • Said that a Study Session won't do any good based on the Commission's comments. • Added that the only way to satisfy is to have a smaller house, while the owner has the right to have a house of this size on this property. • Reminded that the story poles are already there. • Asked if the Commission could approve this project if he were to flatten the roof to the maximum 26 -foot height. Commissioner Nagpal said that the 26 -foot height is not what is before this Commission. She added that there is also a bulk issue. She asked if Mr. Marty Oakley supports a Study Session. Commissioner Cappello said that as there has been no request by the applicant for a continuance he suggests a vote be taken. Commissioner Kundtz suggested giving them an opportunity to continue to a date certain to allow additional story poles be installed and for the applicant to speak to other neighbors. Mr. Marty Oakley said that he has no problem doing better story poles but asked what other neighbors need to be approached. *Commissioner Kundtz said that adjacent neighbors involve 360 degrees and includes rear neighbors. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for August 8, 2007 Page 9 Chair Hlava said that tonight the- Commission could only discuss the 29 -foot height. If continued, the applicant could return with a modified design to a maximum of 26 feet in height. 0 Mr. Marty Oakley suggested a condition of approval to allow up to a maximum of 26 -feet in height. He pointed out that the distributed drawings including the 26 -foot high option. Commissioner Cappello said that the report was based on the 29.5 -foot design. Mr. Marty Oakley said that the only change would be in flattening out the roof or lowering the pitch. Director John Livingstone asked if the 26 -foot proposal was included in the packet. Mr. Marty Oakley replied yes. Commissioner Nagpal said that it is just one sheet included. Mr. Marty Oakley said that the difference would be a 4 and 12 pitch for a maximum height of -26 feet versus the 7 and 12 pitch that reaches a maximum height of 29.5 feet. Acting City Attorney Bill Parkin said it is his recommendation to continue this matter if the 26- foot height limit is to be considered so the Planning Commission would have the information it needs to make a decision. Chair Hlava asked. when the item could come back. Director John Livingstone recommended continuance to a date uncertain to allow the designer to modify his drawings and work with his neighbors and staff. Chair Hlava said that the clock is ticking which costs the applicant money. Mr. Marty Oakley said that he has no'direction from the Commission. Commissioner Nagpal asked staff ff they could work with the applicant. Director John Livingstone said that it appears that a major design change is requested for this project, as there are bulk -and Design Review issues with the height and architectural purity of .,the project. He said that it appears major changes would be required to get the entire Planning Commission to support this project. _ Chair Hlava said that continuing to a date uncertain takes longer. Director John Livingstone suggested asking the applicant his preference, as it would place the . burden on him to get revised plans, ready quickly. Chair Hlava asked Mr. Marty Oakley if he wants a date certain or uncertain. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes for August 8, 2007 Page 10 Mr. Marty Oakley said he prefers a date certain but added he is still unclear on what he is required to do. Chair Hlava: • Said that the height should not exceed 26 feet. • Suggested that Mr. Marty Oakley look at the bulk issues raised. • Added that there is concern over the general size of this house. • Stated that staff can give him additional direction.. • Pointed out to the Commission that if the item were continued to a date certain no additional noticing would be necessary. Director John Livingstone said that the September 12th agenda would be fine. He added that Acting City Attorney Bill Parkin is suggesting that re- noticing occur anyway. Chair Hlava said that it appears that the item should be continued to a date uncertain although staff will try to get this project back on the agenda for the September 12th meeting. Mr. Marty Oakley asked if he limits the height to 26 feet maximum could he come back with a different architectural style. that is not required to achieve architectural purity. Chair Hlava replied right. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Nagpal, seconded by Commissioner Rodgers, the Planning Commission CONTINUED TO A DATE UNCERTAIN consideration of a Design Review Approval (Application #07 -396) to allow a new two -story residence with basement and secondary dwelling unit and with a Height Exception to allow a maximum height of 29.5 feet on property located at 15400 Peach Hill Road, to allow the applicant to prepare revised plans with a maximum height of 26 feet, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Cappello, Hlava, Kundtz, Nagpal and Rodgers NOES: None ABSENT: Kumar ABSTAIN: Zhao • Attachment 3 0 Open Letter to The Saratoga Planning Department & Commissioners • • From: Rao and Sita Arimilli September 5, 2007 Re: 15400 Peach Hill Road, APN 517 -22 -072 — New Design Dear Commission Members & Staff We are writing this letter informing you of the changes we have incorporated in the new design submitted to The Saratoga Planning Department on September 4, 2007. We have addressed 100% of the issues and concerns we heard during: • Aug 8`h, 2007 Design Review • Conversation with staff of Saratoga Planning Department. John and Chris we would like to thank you for your valuable help and guidance. • Conversations with members of the Planning Commission. We would like to thank you for your valuable advice and guidance. • Consultations with other Architects in Saratoga The following table shows the issues and concerns that were voiced and how these have been addressed by the "New Design" we have submitted Issue __. y r De changes incorporated` Comments Comments Bonding height at 29; 6" isabovb � • 'The new goof height is This was achieved by a new floor the city code' �� r;r .. - according tothe_city plan and Tuscan home F s _ code architecture /design s .. P e , 'Less than 5% of the new Y roof design is at 26' (city' code limit) fxcesslve Bulk • Floor plan nof the main Page 10 of the submittal shows RoofHne at hrghest point$_ level and basement the overlay of new design on the is too long 'and does Worry: Changed to reduce width old design. y havE "breaks" z of the house and reduce Too; much space rn the height of the house i&"­4`06 Width of-the house ­;--creating laving space facing road has been •= Width of the house reduced from 170' to facing theyroad is big 147' (approximately 15% reduction) • Approximately 40% of r previous roof structure has been eliminated' x "y The new design is a t }' - "Tuscan" style home s= Issue` ;� Desrgn changes Comments orated ;kpC6r k'Y which includes varying }'� i�r rooflines 'stone columns ; ' i . prgJecting architectural! height within city code .. igh ; � SecondUnit Design �F K • Basement floor Ian has z p The second unit is self contained been changed; • A separate entrance to' .. �� the second unit has-been, z �� ncn expressed by a neighbor ' C oer • Reduced building height . Dr. Connelly signed the Dr Connel�yregardmg bu�ldi g v . Re "viewed`the design .: "Neighbor Notification Form" he�ght'� with Dr and Mrs and is attached to this letter g� . Showed a satellite map ,�� ,� properties and from Dr Connelly r� backyard reviewed the . " -�y- °: location of the_house • Bothk Dr. & Mrs. Connell satisfaction Based on the above list we hope that all issues and concerns have been addressed by the new design we have submitted to the City of Saratoga. Attached to this letter are "City of Saratoga, Neighbor Notification" forms signed by 1. Dr. Jack Connelly (15405 Hume Dr) 2. Mrs. Romona Brooks (15355 Peach Hill) 3. Mrs. Barbara Elfving (15451 Peach Hill) 4. Mr. Robert and Mrs. Patricia Dale (15419 Peach Hill) We are unable to contact Mr. & Mrs. Carey (15320 Peach Hill) but they have signed off on the previous plans. We will continue our effort to contact them regarding the new design. Sincerely Rao & Sita Arimilli (September 5, 2007) • • • • Attachment 4 • Community Development Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, California 95070 15400 Peach Hill Road ARBORIST REPORT APN 517 -22 -072 Owner: Rao and- Sita Arimilli INTRODUCTION Application #: 07 -364 June 18, 2007 Prepared by Kate Bear, City Arborist Phone (408) 868 -1276 The property owner of 15400 Peach Hill Road has submitted a preliminary site plan to the city to construct a new home on a vacant lot. Eighteen trees protected by City Ordinance 15 -050 and potentially impacted by construction were inventoried for this project. Each tree was numbered with an aluminum tag for ease of identification. Data for each tree is included in a Tree Inventory Table at the end of this report. Tree locations are noted on the attached -copy of the -Site Plan. The plans reviewed for this report include a Site Plan, dated April 2007 and prepared by Dunbar and Craig, a'Grading and Drainage Plan dated May 21, 2007 by B. A. Zuhdi Consulting Engineers and a Landscape Plan dated May 21, 2007 by Koch & Associates, Inc.. SITE OBSERVATIONS, PLAN REVIEW AND TECHNICAL DISCUSSION Eighteen trees are potentially impacted by. construction. They include nine coast live oaks ( #1 — 3, 6 10 and 12 -15), one Arizona cypress ( #4), one Deodar cedar ( #5), three Austrian pines ( #7, 8 and 11), one black :oak ( #9), and three eucalyptus ( #16 —.18). Tree #13 is not shown on the plans and should be surveyed and included on the plans. Trees # 4 — 8 are in conflict with the project and proposed for removal. They include one deodar cedar, one Arizona cypress, two pines and one coast live oak. All but the oak tree are in fair or poor health or have poor structure or both. Pine #7 has cankers in the trunk which indicate decay sites and it could fail at these points. The coast live oak tree has two main trunks and included bark where they meet, and, although it can be relocated, I do not require it for this project. The owner may relocate the tree if desired, but I recommend selecting a site other than the area within the turn around for vehicles on the driveway. It is acceptable to remove these five trees for the project and replace them following construction with new trees. Replacement trees - should be valued at $7,960. Replacement values can be found at the bottom of the Tree Inventory Table that is attached to this report. This translates into 16 trees of 24 inch box size or five trees of 36 inch box size and one tree of 24 inch box size. At least four of the trees should be from the City's list of natives. The applicant has requested the ability to remove the trees following Planning Commission approval and prior to issuance of building division permits. This is acceptable. The driveway should be constructed of pervious materials on top of existing grade within the canopies of oak trees #1 — 3. A soil cut exists about two feet from tree #2 and, if a retaining wall is needed at this tree, Page 1 of 4 • • • 15400 Peach Hill Road 10it should be no closer to the trunk than the existing cut. No excavation to construct the driveway should o'ccur within 6 feet from trees #1 — 3. Drainage for the driveway involves a drain line about 6 feet from tree #l. This should be bored under roots and no trenching should occur to install it. No roots measuring 2 inches or larger should be cut for any of the drain lines. A second driveway is proposed in the vicinity of trees #10 — 15. It will impact trees #10, 11, 14 and 15. It also, should be constructed of pervious materials on top of grade under the canopies of these trees and no excavation should occur to construct it within 10 feet from tree #11 or 8 feet from tree #10. Drainage is proposed under the driveway that will require the removal of trees #10, 13 and 14. Rip rap structures should not be placed under the canopies of the oaks or within 10 feet of pine tree #11. Retaining walls are proposed near trees #9, 16, 17 and 18. They should be constructed with footings rather than continuous trenching under the canopies of these trees. Tree #9 is a black oak in excellent condition and the retaining wall should remain at least seven feet from its trunk. The walls near trees #16 - 18 should be at least 15 feet from the trunks of these trees. The drainage between trees #17 and 18 should remain at least 15 feet from either tree. Roots measuring two inches or larger should be tunneled under rather than cut to install the line. All locations for utilities (including trenching for water, sewer, drainage, gas and electrical) should be shown on the plans so they can be evaluated for impacts to trees. Landscaping plans, including irrigation lines, valves and controller locations should also be shown so they can be evaluated for impacts to trees. Per City Ordinance 15- 50.080, a bond in the amount of $95,560, which is equal to 100% of the total appraised value trees #1 — 3, 9 —11, 14 —18, is required. This amount may change as the design is developed. Appraisal values are calculated according to the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9rh Edition, published by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), 2000. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. This entire report, including the Tree Inventory Table and the map showing locations of trees and protective fencing, shall be incorporated into the set of final building plans. 2. Tree protective fencing shall be installed as shown on the attached map and established prior to obtaining building division permits. It shall be comprised of six -foot high chain link fencing mounted on eight -foot tall, two -inch diameter galvanized posts, driven 24 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. 3. Owner shall provide a tree protection bond in the amount of $95,560 prior to obtaining building division permits. The amount of the bond may change if the design of the project changes to impact fewer or more trees. 4. Owner shall replace trees approved for removal with replacement trees equal in value to the total appraised value of the trees. Replacement trees shall total $7,960 in appraised value. Replacement values of trees can be found at the bottom of the Tree Inventory Table following this report. Page 2 of 4 15400 Peach Hill Road 5. Trees approved for removal may be removed following Planning Commission approval and prior to issuance of building division permits. 6. At least four of the replacement trees shall be from the City's list of natives: coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), valley oak (Quercus lobata), blue oak (Quercus douglasiana), black oak (Quercus kelloggii), big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), California buckeye (Aesculus californica), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens). 7. Any grading or trenching under a tree's canopy shall be approved by the city arborist prior to performing work. If approved, it shall be done manually using shovels. Any roots measuring two inches or larger shall be retained and tunneled under; roots measuring less than two inches may be cut with a sharp pruning instrument. This includes installation of drainage to rip rap structures. 8.. Plans shall show locations for all utilities including electrical, drainage, water, sewer and gas lines. 9. Trees shall be watered every three weeks during the dry summer months or more often as necessary to ensure their continued good health. Water using a soaker hose or drip line midway between the trunk and the edge of the canopy. Use enough water so that the soil is moist to a depth of one foot deep. 10. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the designated fenced area (even after fencing is removed): These activities include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: demolition, grading, trenching, equipment cleaning, stockpiling and dumping materials (including soil fill), and equipment /vehicle operation and parking. 11. Any approved grading or trenching beneath the tree's canopy shall be manually performed using shovels. 12. if landscaping will occur, design the plans to show the following:. a. Design irrigation so that it does not spray trunks of trees. Locate valve boxes and controllers outside of drip lines of tree canopies. b. Select plants with similar water requirements to the trees under which they will be placed. c. Design lawns so that there is room between them and the trunk of any tree; confine lawn areas to-the outside 20% of the area under the canopy. d. Plant only drought tolerant plants compatible with oaks under the oak trees. Do not include lawn within the drip line of any oak tree on the property. e. Design topdressings . so that stones or mulch remain at least one foot from the trunks of retained trees and 6 inches from the trunks of new trees. f. Do not allow tilling or stripping of the topsoil beneath the trees' canopies. g. Establish edging material proposed beneath tree canopies on top of existing soil grade by using stakes. 13. Any pruning of trees on site must be performed under the supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. 14. The disposal of harmful products (such as chemicals, oil, gasoline, herbicides, rinse water from paint or concrete, or other harmful materials) is prohibited beneath tree canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath tree canopies. Page 3 of 4 15400 Peach Hill Road Attachments: Tree Inventory Table Map Showing Tree Locations and Protective Fencing • Page 4 of 4 TREE INVENTORY TABLE Address: June 18, 2007 15400 Peach Hill Road. 0 Coast live oak Cd o o o >~ 1 Quercus a ri olia 14.6 25 80 0 Good as 2 $3,930 Coast live oak 8.1, a 2 Quercus a ri olia 8.9 25 90 70 o a c13 11 a" Cz c $3,080 Coast live oak Cd o 3 0 Q 3 Quercus a ri olia . 12.6 20 b 3 3 Good High � N $2,950 Arizona cypress a Q4° b o II U� .t II �o o U 1; o ° t' a o o -o b TREE Cu ressus arizonica 13.5 12 20 20 Fair Low 1 >~ (D . ;° NO. TREE NAME H w S 1 x 1 1 O I Q Z ° a Address: June 18, 2007 15400 Peach Hill Road. 0 Coast live oak 1 Quercus a ri olia 14.6 25 80 80 Good High 2 $3,930 Coast live oak 8.1, 2 Quercus a ri olia 8.9 25 90 70 Good High 2 $3,080 Coast live oak 3 Quercus a ri olia . 12.6 20 80 80 Good High 2 $2,950 Arizona cypress 4 Cu ressus arizonica 13.5 12 20 20 Fair Low 1 X $560 Deodar cedar 5 Cedrus deodara 19.5 30 30 10 Fair Low 1 X $1,320 Coast live oak 8.4, 6 Quercus a ri olia 9.3 20 90 40 Good Moderate 1 X $2,090 Austrian pine 7 Pinus ni ra 27.5 40 10 10 Poor Low 1 X $820 Austrian pine 8_ Pinus ni ra 31.1 45 30 20 Poor Low 1 X $3,170 Black oak 9 Quercus kelloggii 9.8 12 90 90 . Good High 2 $4,040 Coast live oak 10 Quercus a ri olia 14 15 60 70 Fair Moderate 2 $2,940 Austrian pine - 11 Pinus ni ra 32.1. 45 60 80 Good High 4 $14,200 Coast live oak 12 , Quercus a " ri olia 7,9 6 80 80 Good High 4 $1,100 Coast live oak 5.7, 5.9, 13 Quercus a ri olia 6.4 15 90 60 Good High 4 X $3,010 Coast live oak .6, 4.4, 14 Quercus a ri olia 4.7 10 80 10 Good Low 3 $500 Coast live oak 15 Quercus a ri olia 9.7 20 100 90 Good High 2 $2,520 Eucalyptus 16 -Eucalyptus leucox Ion 28.1 35. 90 80 Good High 3 $16,300 Eucalyptus 17 Eucalyptusleucoxylon 28.9 35 90 80 Good High 2 $17,200 Address: June 18, 2007 15400 Peach Hill Road. 0 r L TREE INVENTORY TABLE Total Appraised Value $107,630 • Replacement Tree Values 15 gallon = $150 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1;500 48 inch box = $5,000 52 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 Should any tree listed above become damaged owner will be required to repair the damage. Should any tree listed above be removed owner will be required to replace that tree with trees equal in value to its assessed value. Address: June 18, 2007 15400 Peach Hill Road Eucalyptus 1 1 1 1 1 18 Eucalyptus leucox lon '� °�' U0 o o Good .. o 3 0 0 0 $27,900 'R � II a 0 U .. Q 0 �a .d 3 3 r �,, i t- 3 o > b 0 II II U p o v 3 0 O �1w °.3 U�. �.o �'�.� o -0 TREE o o W M� t10 x II 0 ao Cd C NO. TREE NAME H C7 W 0 V x Z � .0 > O . x 0 0 ai Q o Z 0° a a 0. ¢ Total Appraised Value $107,630 • Replacement Tree Values 15 gallon = $150 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1;500 48 inch box = $5,000 52 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 Should any tree listed above become damaged owner will be required to repair the damage. Should any tree listed above be removed owner will be required to replace that tree with trees equal in value to its assessed value. Address: June 18, 2007 15400 Peach Hill Road Eucalyptus 1 1 1 1 1 18 Eucalyptus leucox lon 38 45 90 80 Good High 3 $27,900 Total Appraised Value $107,630 • Replacement Tree Values 15 gallon = $150 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1;500 48 inch box = $5,000 52 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 Should any tree listed above become damaged owner will be required to repair the damage. Should any tree listed above be removed owner will be required to replace that tree with trees equal in value to its assessed value. Address: June 18, 2007 15400 Peach Hill Road Attachment 5 ..Y'i City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS:�Q/"CE' � % / O� puaU'l #1 // ROQd sora fv Dear Neighbor, �t/VQ.t"�- 2007 " 1 ant proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street front the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yoterself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELLVI.NARYONLYand may be changed as the project moves fonvard. You may;contact the City of Saratoga 's Planning Division at any once to review any cha%iges that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If ynu have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 -868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. _%M signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: t %��� +- J• g,�aoKs Date: �nl L% 2OG7Z 6: .4167 Signature: Nei;hbor Address: 4-4 �V leZi Neighbor Phone 7-0 iy � If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. Nly concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: isApplication Number: Date: 6of6 City of Saratoga Neighbor- Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: ,�Q/"�'eI % /5400 icW #f �l lPOQc .SQrrrf Dear Neighbor, 0 dew De�� U Usf ::2,C07 LJ 7 am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City !Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. -I ask that you familiarize- yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELI,Ifli ARY O�l'•LYand maybe changed as the project moves fonvard. You may.con tact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at anytime to review any changes that may occtcr. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans _ate preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact _ the City of Saratoga at 408- 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My slonature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project' plans. Neighbor Nam R-4 �1- r✓Jn16 - Date: 5I�.s/7 pale • s 3,67 Signature: Neighbor Address: �,z W44 ZQ6 \, `4_ 4-7aCs�%i Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project - I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets„ if necessary): Applicant Name: Date: Application Number: 6of6 • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS:� Jcw #f' // Road( S'OM Dear Neighbor, New DOK , o ,q (, s 5007 r/ I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to revietiv the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarise yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELItiI AARYONLYand may be changed as the project moves fonvard. You may,contact the City of Saratoga 's Planning Division at any time to revietiv any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact _ the City of Saratoga at 403 -365 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. Nly signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the 40 preliminary project plans. S - e - O `eishbor 'Name: 2 -t' Signature: - X��'e� Neighbor Address: kt�" ti ( 4 e GAC.64 k t L Kl) . S A-7crk-m G-A Neighbor Phone--": Cl ( � If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. NIy concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Application Number: Date: 6 of 6 City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 70Q1"Cd I, /SHOO VL fi�fl% /C ©QC3! -SUraf Dear Neighbor, 1 ant proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you ivith an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELLVINARYONLYand may be changed as the project moves fonvard. You may,contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest'in the project, you may contact _ the City of Saratoga at 403- 3'63 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. 'Iv signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. N21ehboC Name: C p C Signature: Neighbor A , ess: Date: k si C Neighbor Phone If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. ,\vIy concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Date: Application Number: 6 of 6 • • .7 City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: Parcel 1, 15400 Peach Hill, Road, Saratoga Dear Neighbor, 1 am proposing a project at the above state address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent our prior to a decision being made on the project. 1 ask that you familiarize yourself with this preliminary plans for the project. These plans are preliminary only and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a.. reduced sefof plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project. you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My Signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans i Neighbor Name: ! IG- Signature:, Neighbor A ess: Date: 1 a S-�Vvjj� -/7 �-+ Neighbor Phone #: 33- `i — `j3 10 If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below: My concerns are the following (Please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Date: 0 Application Number: Attachment 6 • • • CITY OF SARATOGA Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 (408) 868 -1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Saratoga's Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on: Wednesday, the 10th day of October, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Theater located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. The public hearing agenda item is stated below. Details of this item are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. Please consult the City website at www.saratoga.ca.us regarding Friday office closures. APPLICATION /ADDRESS: DR 07 -396 / 15400 Peach Hill Road APPLICANT /OWNER: Rao and Sita Arimilli APN: 517 -22 -072 DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct a new two -story single - family residence, including a basement and an attached Secondary Dwelling Unit. The total floor area of the proposed residence and garage will be approximately 6,699 square feet. The residence will not exceed 26 feet in height. The net lot size is approximately 1.6 acres and the site is zoned R -1- 40,000. Design Review approval by the Planning Commission is required pursuant to Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.060. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a Public Hearing in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing. In order for information to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed on or before Thursday, October 4, 2007. This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor's office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out -of -date information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all residents potentially affected by a project. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Christopher Alan Riordan, AICP Senior Planner (408) 868 -1235 ieptember 21, 2007 ;00' Ownership Listing 'repared for: i17 -22 -072 dARY MCCANDLESS .5400 PEACH HILL RD ;ARATOGA CA 95070 110 -02 -017 510 -02 -024 510 -02 -025 ✓IARION C & JOHN CONNOLLY LESTER G SACHS CHAIHO & TAEOCK KIM )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER .5405 HUME DR 19941 SUNSET DR 19977 SUNSET DR ;ARATOGA CA 95070 -6416 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6438 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6438 ,10 -52 -004 510 -52 -005 510 -52 -006 )AVID A & JOAN DRENNAN BANNICK M & M DAVID A & SHEILA BROWN )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 5365 HUME DR 15387 HUME DR ' 15391 HUME DR ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -6416 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6416 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6416 10 -52- 007,008 510 -52- 009,010 517 -22 -024 'ARK FAMILY TRUST MICHAEL S PLINER DAVID WHITNEY )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 5269 HUME DR 15257 HUME DR 15374 MADRONE HILL RD ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -6415 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6415 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6401 17 -22 -04.1 517 -22 -055 517 -22 -068 TARY E & LANAYA DIX HORINE FAMILY TRUST CHARLES J & ROMONA BROOKS )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 5404 MADRONE HILL RD 15250 PEACH HILL RD 15355 PEACH HILL RD �ARATOGA CA 95070 -6401 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6448 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6402 17 -22 -070 IARITA K JOHNSON 517 -22- 071,072 517 -22 -074 DARRELL E & ANGELIN DUKES )R CURRENT OWNER MARY MCCANDLESS OR CURRENT OWNER 5277 PEACH HILL RD 16326 RIDGECREST AVE 15329 PEACH HILL RD : ARATOGA CA 95070.6469 MONTE SERENO CA 95030 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6402 17 -22 -078 517 -22 -079 517 -22 -087 OHN & CAROL GIANNANDREA FREDERICK S & SHARON ANDRES ROBERT L & PATRICIA DALE )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 5363 PEACH HILL RD 15255 PEACH HILL RD 15419 PEACH HILL RD ARATOGA CA 95070 -6402 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6469 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6402 17 -22 -088 517 -22 -099 517 -22 -100 VILLIAM J & BARBARA ELFVING THOMAS C & JUDITH LAVEY MEHDI AMINI -RAD )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 5451 PEACH HILL RD 15375 PEACH HILL RD 15397 PEACH HILL RD ARATOGA CA 95070 -6402 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6402 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6402 17 -22 517 -22 -112 517 -22 -121 -111 �BAL HUSAIN DAVID J & TERESA CAREY TERESA R & DAVID CAREY 0140 MENDELSOHN LN OR CURRENT OWNER 15320 PEACH HILL RD ARATOGA CA 95070 -5904 PEACH HILL RD SAR ATOGA CA 95070 -6448 SAR SARATOGA CA 95070 -6448 • E 0 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, Denise Kaspar , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the 2151 day of September 2007, that I deposited 31 notices in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to -wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the'owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15- 45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property described as: Address: 15400 Peach Hill Road AP N : 517 -22 -072 that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. i� Denise Kaspar Advanced Listing Services • • • 517 -22 -122 517 -23 -001 517 -23 -021 :7LYDE R WALLIN YUPAN WEN IQBAL HUSAIN �R RRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 20140 MENDELSOHN LN l5 ACH HILL RD 15481 PEACH HILL RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5904 iA OGA CA 95070 -6448 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6402 517 -23 -022 UCHARD A & DEBRA BELGARD :)R CURRENT OWNER 15571 PEACH HILL RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6472 kdvanced Listing Services '.O. Box 2593 )ana Point CA 92624 • • 517 -38- 002,004 W L PELIO 14573 BIG BASIN WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -6801 386 -14 -029 CITY OF SARATOGA ATTN: CHRISTOPHER RIORDAN 13777 FRUITVALE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 Attachment 7 • LegalAdvertisingblicNotices AMY SHU YANG THE COURT ORDERS that all Persons interested in this fir General matter shall appear before Notices this court at the hearing indi- Gated below to show cause, if any, why the petition for ORDERTO SHOW CAUSE change of name should not FUR CHANGEOF NAME be startled. CASE NO. 107CV093454 Notice of Hearing on OCIO• SUPERIOR COURT Of [ALI- DER 30, 2007 a1 8:45 a.m.in FORMA, COUNTY OF SANTA ROOM 107 treated al s CIARA, 191 NORTH FIRST North first Street, San lase, .. STREET, SAN JOSE, CA 95113 95113. A COPY or this order to show IN THE MATTER YANG PETI• ease shall each published at THE OF SHU YANG toast once each week for THE COURT FINDS that Four suc[ersfve weeks prbr Petitioners) SHU YANG to the date set for hearing on has /have fled for a decree the petition in the following changing name(s) as fol- newspaper of general circu- lows: lotion, SARATOGA NEWS, Present name: SHU YANG printed in the County of Proposld'mma: Santa Clara. Important Information: No of-& xfi rubrowion. C.—W & will rwei,r rndir (w fugue dwrdiug. nor a n•Iv�. Adr maw be oxrkJ bfaw dwd- GPe br dm isnw. Ad wdwnwno xm m pred upaa dv "i -modnn dm the ad.nruw -& us agvrsry low de right w publid de sowmnu dry wf. to —d-m- of svcb publindaa adw ofd Lu i .gray agrw m imkomifyand hod de puFBrfvn harmlm'pmn my r'P'ww bl Ims by few, ofeaydaim wing our... b- mn.'IM puhGdwr owvwn dw HgAr m edit. Jrea omit. m sefuw .ny'dwnidng su6miwad. I:w pnliaia iog rpe •;G4wwr�r�dlp�er�aara.zq�0.loz5 gmp heguminga agaryar nr ema0 m n dan8ird{'mmmunitym.apapvuom. • Dated: SEPTEMBER 0. 2007 /Mary Ann Grilli / Judge of the Superior Court (Pub SN 9/12, 9119. 9126. 10/3) NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF BARBARAJANE HANSEN CASE RD. 1-07-PI-162000 To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors• contingent cmdi- tors• and persons who may otherw be interested i the will qise r estate, err both on f BARBARA JANE HANSEN A PETITION has been fled by GERALD B. 11111 in the Superior Court of C"1111a, County of Santa Clara. THE PETITION requests that GERALD B. HANSEN be appointed as pen nalrepre• sentative to administer the S Ikon Vauey Community NewspaPers K"Pts no lia• bilk, for ns fmo.. Tar r, me, m in I im aaertise irmt. Liability for any error aPPeadn{ in'n whrni i.—I B limited to the all of the space raven, occupiM No 'ne.,"I" however. win be {onwd ks an error Nat does rot malerb ry'"'a the wlue of Ne aMertiwment. H qualb if for an idius M run ertos must be reported within 15 errs of Pubnnnon cote. Chit br errors is lic to first in nor. estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests the decedent's WILL and codi- cils, 1f any, be admitted to P.61. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court. THE PETITION request, authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act (This author• sty wiR allow the personal representative to lake many actions without obtaining court approval. Before tak- ing certain very important actions, however, the per- sonal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons less they have waived notice or consented to Ne proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an inter• esotn e d tpe son ples an n o bajecd o thFielil n shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority. A HEARING on the lien ill be held on OCTOBER 18. 2007, 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 15 loaned at 191 North First St., San lose, CA 95113. IF YOU OBJECT to the granti- ng of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the deceased, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personalrepre- sentative appointed by the curl within four months from the date of first issuance of letters as pruvid• ed in section 9100 of the California Probate Code. The time for filing claims will not expire before four months from the hearing date noticed above. YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a format Request for Special Notice of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in section 1250 of the California Probate Code. A Request for Special Notice hermit available from the court clerk Attorney for petitioner: RUSSELLV. ROESSLER, ESQ. 111 W. ST. JOHN ST. #706 SAN JOSE. CA 95113 408. 295.1385 (Pub SN 9126,1013,10/10) NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF EDITH SHANTA DAS LOOME14 aka E. SHANTA DAS, SHANTA D. LOOMEIL and SHANTA DAS LOOMER CASE NO. 1-07-PR-161872 To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors• contingent ­di- lots, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of EDITH SHANTA DAS LOOMER. aka E. SHANTA DAS• SHANTA D. LOOMER and SHANTA DAS LOOMER A PETITION has been filed by SHANTELLE LOOMER e DAVID LOOMER in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. THE PETITION requests that 5HANTELLE LOOMER 8 DAVID LOOMER be appoint- ed as personal mp-linta- five to administer the estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests the decedent's WILL and ID& c,,,. if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court. THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This author- ity will allow the personal representa[ve to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent adnrmisimlkm authority will be granted unless an interested person files an abjection to the peti. tion and shows Rood cause why the court should nor grant the authority. A HEARING on the petition will be held on OCTOBER 11, 2007, 9:00 a.m. in Depl. 15 located at 191 North First S1., San lose, CA 95113. IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections err file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in per• n or by your attorney. IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the deceased, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal representative appointed by the court within four months from the date of first issuance of fetters as provided in section 9100 of the California Probate Code. The time for filing claims will not expire before lour months from the hearing dale noticed above. YOU MAY EXAMINE the file ur kept by the cot If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a formal Request for Special Notice of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as P! in section 1250 of the California Probate Code. A Request for Special Notice farm is astable from the court clerk Attorney for petitioner: DOUGLAS BARNES DOUGLAS P. BARNES. A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORP. 210 ALMINDRA AVE. LOS GATOS. CA 95030 408- 395.4800 (Pub SN 9126. 1013, 10110) NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF EDNA MAY GARROD CASE NO.1.07 -PR- 161986 To II heirs. beneficiaries, creditors, contingent coedi- tors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate. or both of EDNA MAY GARROD A PETITION has been filed by NANCY G. COOPER ' in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clam. THE PETITION m quests that NANCY G. COOPER be appointed as personalrepre- senlative to administer the estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests the decedent's WILL and codi. ciH, if any, be atlmitled to probate. The will and any codicils are available for .examination in the file kept SAN JOSE, CA 95113 may be in person or by your ing and visit the site listed Feeling or architectural his. UNDER A DEED OF TRUST BOOK 559 OF DEEDS, PAGE office of the Recorder by the court. IF YOU OBJECT to the granli- attorney. above and may visit other tory of the City, the County, DATED 3110/2006. UNLESS 427; THENCE NORTH 37 of SANTA CLARA County THE PETITION requests off of the Petition, you IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a tiles as well. For more infor• the Stale or the nation YOU TAKE ACTION TO DEG. 53' WEST 355.72 FEET CALIFORNIA. Said Deed of authority to administer should appear at the hearing contingent creditor of the malign please contact the. in that it represents a PROTECT YOUR PROPERTY. TO A STAKE STANDING Trust describes the following the estate under the d slate your objections or deceased, you must file your Community Development Craftsman style home con. IT MAY BE SOLO AT PUB- ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY property: Independent Administration file written objections w8h claim with the court and mail Department at 408 868 - slructed in the early 1900x. LiC SALE. IF YOU NEED AN LINE OF THAT TRACT OF YOU ARE IN DEFAULT of Estates Act. (This author the court before the hearing. aCopy to the personal repre• 1222 or review the Site Visit The structure exhibits many EXPLANATION OF THE LAND CONVEYED BY UNDER A DEED OF TRUST icy Hill allow the' personal Your appearance may be in sentaCrve appointed by the Agenda on the City Websile f the character depning NATURE Of THE PROCEED- SOLEDAO 0. DE ARGUELLO, DATED DECEMBER 15, representative to take many person or by your attoney. ....I within four months at www.saraloga.ca.us. fealures of such o home, and ET AL, TO W.T. RUCKER, actions without obtaining IPYOU AREA CREDITOR ore from the date of first APPLICATION has retained these features LNG AGAINST YOU, YOU ET AL, BY DEED DATED 2000. UNLESS YOU TAKE court approval. Belorc tak- c.Fit n..of creditor of the. issuance of lelten as provid- #07.126 /PSP %-0002 through history. The home SHOUED CONTACT A FEBRUARY 16, 1867 AND ACTION TO PROTECT YOUR ins certain very important decease d, you must file your ed in section 9100 of the (386.35 -069) also fronts on a portion of LAWYER• RECORDED FEBRUARY 16, PROPERTY, IT MAY BE actions, however, the per claim with the court and mail California Probate Code. The Church of the Ascension, Saratoga Avenue designated A public auction sale Ip the 1867. IN BOOK X OF DEEDS, SOLD AT A PUBLIC SALE. IF sonal representative will be a copy to the personal repre• lime far filing claims will Fat 12033 Miller Avenue /19550 as a heritage lane. highest bidder for cash, PAGE 133; THENCE ALONG YOU NEED AN EXPLANA. required lo. give notice to senlalive appointed by the expire before four months Prospect Road: - The appli- • The Property embodies dis• cashier's check drawn on a SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE TION OF THE NATURE OF interested persons unless court within four months from the hearing date rant requests design review linclive characteristics of a state or national a state or check NORTH 44 DEG. 30' EAST THE PROCEEDING AGAINST _ they have waived notice m from the date of first notced above. for an illuminated freestand. style, type, period or method drawn by a slate or federal 68.24 FEET TO THE.MOST YOU, YOU SHOULD COS .consented to the proposed issuance of letters as provid• YOU MAY EXAMINE the file ingsiffninthe R- 1.10district of construction, or is a credit union, or a check WESTERLY CORNER OF TAC7A LAWYER. action.) The independent ed in Probate Code section kept by Ihecourt. If You are The hi {h density urethane valuable example of the use drawn by a slate or federal THE AFOREMENTIONED 1.0 13033 MONTROSE ST, administatlon authority will 9100. The time for fling a person interested in the architectural foam sign will of indigenous materials savings and loan ...ua- ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO SARATOGA, CA 95070 be granted unless an inter• claims willnot expire before esvh, you may file with the be mounted on a stone block in that it 'is a distinguished lion, ar savings association. SAID LUDWIG TOMY; ¢sled person tiles an objet- four months from the hear court a formal Request br base and painted beige with example of a Gaftzman or savmgs bank specified in THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH Of a street atldress or tion to the petition and ing date noticed above. Special Notice of the filing of brown lettering, which will residence. Containing many Se<lion 5102 of the Financial WESTERLY LINE OF SAID common designation e( shows good cause why the YOU MAY EXAMINE the file an inventory and appraisalof match the colon on the adja- characteristic details, such Code and authorized to do 1.00 ACRE SOUTH 36 DEG. property is shown above, no court should not grant the 'kept by the court. If you are estate assets or of any pet s• cent church bulidings. The as rock walls, knee hates, business in this state will be 40' EAST 362.61 FEET TO warranty is given as to its authority. a person interested in the tion or account as provided combined si {n and base will wood siding, and multi•lile held by the duly appointed THE PLACE OF BEGINNING completeness or conect. ' A HEARING on the petition estate, you may filewiththe in section 1250 of the be approximately five feet windows, the strong hand. trustee as shown below, of AND BEING A PORTION OF ness). will beheld on OCTOBER 15, court a Request for Special Califomia Probate Code. A high and eight feet wide. The crafted sense inherent in the all fight, title, and interest THE QUITO RANCHO. Said Sale of property will 20D7, 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 15 Notice (form DE -154) of the Request for S ecial Notice text will spell out °Church of building (arms clearty assn- conveyed to and now held by A,P•N.; 397.26 -002 be made in as is condition - totaled at 191 North First St, filing of an inventory and corm is- available from the the .Ascension Roman dale the design with bung a- the trustee in the herein after The undersigned Trustee without covenant or San lose. CA 95113. aypaisal is estate assets or tour clerk. Catholic" and will include lows from the period. The described property under disclaims any liability for warranty. express or implied, IF YOU OBJECT to the grand. of any petition or account as Allurney Far petitioner. the times of the masses. house remains today as a a d pursuant to a Deed any incorrectness of the regarding title possession. _ nq of the petition. you provided in Probate [ode MATTHEW A CROSBY, APPLICATION 1 %•396 clear represent mon of its oT Trust described below. street address ar other com- or encumbrances, posse should a ear" the hearing Section 7250. A R vest for CID #070524 The sale will be made, but umbances, to Day the PP M (517- 23 -075)Arimilli,. era, in bath design and mom designation, i( any, remaining principal sum and stale your objections or S eclat Nolke corm is avail- 2785 PARKAVENUE 15400 Peach Hlll Road: •The deviling, and Is an excellent without covenant or warren- shown above. fin. street g pnn ip file written objections wish able from the court clerk. SANTA CLARA CA 95050 - applicant requests Design example of Craftsman rest. ty,' expressed ar implied, address or other common of the note(z) secured the court before the hearing. Attorney for Petitioner 408.370.7500 . Review approval to construct dential architecture in regarding title, possession, designation is shown, by said Deed of Trust, with Your appearance may be in AGUIUR, ROBERT D. (Pub SN 9/12, 9/19, 9/26) anew two -story single facet- Saratoga." or encumbrances, to paY directions to the location a( interest as in said note pro. . person a' by your attorney. 177 BUDD AVE. 7 ly residence, including a • The Property embodies or the remaining principal sum the property may be vided, advances, if any, IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a CAMPBELL, CA 95008 basement and an attached_ contributes to unique phys4 of the note(s) secured by obtained by sending a under the terms of said contingent creditor of the 9119.9126,10)3107 �:. Secondary . Dwelling Unit. cal characteristics represent. the Deed of Trust, with written request to the Deed of Trust. fees, charges deceased, You must file your CNS- 1199363# - '� City _ The total Floor area of the its an established and famf. interest and late charges beneficiary within 10 days and expenses of the Trustee claim with the mart and math SARATOGA NEWS - 1 .proposed residence and "tar visual feature of a neigh. (hereon, as provided in the of the dale of first publics- and of the trusts sealed by copyto the personalrepre (Pub IN 9/19.9/26. 1013) `egalS garage will be approximately borhood or dizlrid within note(s), advances, under tion of this Notice of said Deed of Trust. senlalive appointed by the - 6,699 square feet. The reel the City in that i[is located the terms of the Deed Sale. Said sale will be held on: court within four months AD710E OF PETITION TO lot size is approximately 1.6 on the portion of Saratoga of Trust, ine'as, thereon, Date: September 18.2007 OCTOBER 10, 2007, AT 10:00 from the date of first ADMINISTERI3TATEOF XOMEOi HEARING acres and the siteUz�ned R- Avenue that has been desig- fees, char {ez and expenses FIRST AMERICAN TITLE. as - .issuance of letters as provid• ALFRED N73FPH MERNONE .BEFORE PLANNING 1- 40.000. ated a heritage lane. It has of the Trustee for the fatal Trustee By WT [spiral Lender A.M. 'AT THE FRONT EN- ed in section 9100 of 'IAe CASE NO.147•PR- 161970 COMMISSION APPLICATION ADR07.002 _been designed and con- amount (at the time of the Services, Its AWhori:ed TRANCE TO THE COUNTY California Probate Code. The To all heirs, 'beneficiaries, CRYOFSARATOGAS - (38946.022) Sripadanna: - slructed in a distinctive initial publication of the Agent COURTHOUSE. 190 N. MAR. . - time for filing claims will not creditors, contingent credi- PLANNING COMMISSION Appeal of an Administrative style, including rock detail. Notice of Sale) reasonably 7522 North Colonial Avenue, KET STREET. SAN JOSE, CA timed before tour months tors, and persons who may announces the following Design Review approval fora ' g on the facades. stimated to be set forth Suite 101 Fresno, CA 93711 At the time of the initial pub. from the hearing dale otherwise be interested in public hearings an remodel with pa!U.l demali- Section 2- Designation: The below. The amount may he (SS 212 -4644 limtion of this notice. the - noticed above. - 'the Will or estate, or bath of Wednesday, the 10th day of lion and addition to the Properly is hereby designer- greater an the day Sale Status Line total amount of the unpaid - - YOU MAY EXAMINE the file ALFRED. J05EPH MERNONE, October at 7:00 p.m. in the existing one -story home ed as a Historic Landmark of sale. Original Truvorls): (774) 259 -7850 balance of the mbligatien kept by the court. If you aka ALFRED 6 MERNONE City Council Chambers Local• located at 18524 Montpere pursuant Lo section 13. Sasan H. Raissi, a single hllp:( /wwwfidelilyasap.com secured by the above _ are a ,person interested in A PETITION has been filed by ad at 13777 Fruitvale Way. The prbDOSai would 15.060 of the Saratoga City man Duly Appointed Debra Berg, described Dead of Trust the estate, you may file KEVIN MERNONE and Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. ovrge the home a rox- Code. Trustee: first American ill¢ Senior Vice President GLENN MERNONE in the Fla' DP Recorded 3/21/2006 as and estimated costs, with the court a formal DelaiU and plans are avail- imately 1,096 square feet Section 3. Publication: This ASAP{ 904737 "Pa's es. and aMances is Request for Special .Notice SuperioYCOUrt of California, able at the 5aratoga (which includes a carport ordinance or a Comprehen. Instrument No. 18851666 in (pub 5N 9(26, 10/3, 10110) 'of the filing of an inventory County of Santa Clara. Community v Development Conversion to enclosed $in summary thereof shall book -, page - f Official that at t It is possible and aP.... oft of estate THE PETITION requests Department Monday garage). Total propose 11 be publ'Ished once in a.= Records in the office of the OSTAC that at the time of sale the asseU or of any petition or That KEVIN MERNONE and throe {h Thursday, 7:30 a.m. area, including {aage would paper of general <ircutalion Recorder of Santa Clara NOTICE Of TRUSTEE'S SALE opening bid may be less account as provided 'n GLENN MERNONE be .5:00 P.m. If you have gags• be 2,730 square feel The of the Clry of Saratoga with- County, California. T.S. NO: F343048 CA than the Iota! indebtedness section -'1250 or the appointed as personal "pre• lions; Pvmnea are available maximum height of the pro. i fifteen (15) days aNer in Date of Sale: UNIT [DOE: F due. California Probate Code. A senlalive lo'adminisler the al the ublir counter Dosed siNCture will not adopUan. ID(17/2007 al 31:00 AM LOAN N0: 7190071446/ Date: September 14, 2007 Request for Special'Notice estate of the decedent. between the hours 017:30 exceed eighteen feet (18). The bregoinS Ordinance was Place of Sale: ATTHE NORTH SALAH T.D. SERVICE COMPANY - form -is available from the THE PETITION equests - The maximum impervious introduced and read at the MARKET STREET ENTRANCE INVESTOR N0: 3¢91034 as said Trustee. SUSAN a.m. and 12:00 noon. court cle rk. authority to administer All interested enons ma coverage would rest exceed regular meeting of the City TO THE COUNTY COURT- AP #1: 389.16 -003 EARNEST, ASSISTANt SEC. Attorney the estate under the ear acrd be Heard at the the allowable 60% of the net Council of the City of HOUSE, 190 NORTH MARKET T.D. SERVICE COMPANY, DIN #HOFFMAN Independent Administration ape site area. The tat size is Saratoga held on the 5th da STREET SAN JOSE.CALIFOR. as duly appoint.d haste¢ REiARY T.O. SERVICE COM- ofEstatesAct.Rhisauthw ab lle ge and puce. Il the 8,520 t vale feet and the of September, 2007, and was NiA Amount of unpaid on the following 1820 71 RIVER ST„ STE 201 challenge a decision of the q P balance and other charges: described Deed of Trust 1820 E. FIRST ST., SANTA CRUZ, CA 95060 try will allow the personal ptannin Commission ur- Property iz bated in the adopted by the following SUITE 210, P.O. BOX 11988 - 831- 423 -1411 • represent"Ove to take many suanl to a mmc sion iF R•10,000 zoning district. ' vote following a second 53.497.994.34 WILL SELL AT PUBLIC • - (Pub 239/19,9/26.1013) actions without obtaining p g (Pub SN 9/26) - reading on the 19th day of - Estimated Street Address AUCTION TO THE HIGHEST SANTA ANA, CA 92711.1988 cour[apDrovaL Before lak- court, you may be limited to. September 2007: or other common designa- BIDDER FOR CASH (in the We are assisting the NOTICE OFAMENDED ing erlain very important auing only those issues you ORDINANCE N0: 253 AYES: Lion of real property: 74195 forms which are lawful Beneficury to collect a debt PETITION TO ADMINISTER .actions,. howevel, the per• or someone else rats d AN O0.DIHANCE OF THE q1Y Coundlmem6ers )ill Hunter, Sanloga Avenue, Saratoga, tender in the United Slates) and any information we - 6TATEOF. - -tonal representative win be at the public bearing(s) OF SARATOW DESIGNATING Kathleen King, Chuck Page, CA legal Description: and/or the cashier's, Geri- obtain will be used for that WILLIAM ARTHUR SANDEN required tb gin, notice to described in this notice, or in THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS yce Mayor BEGINNING AT A POINT lied or other checks sped• purpose whether received CASE N0.1 -07-PR- 161820 interested persons unless written correspondence IAMpHFM HOUSEAT 13855 Ann Waltonsmith, ON THE NORTHWESTERLY tied in Civil Code Section orally or in writing. -To ail heirs. beneficiaries. they have waived notice of delivered to the Saratoga SARATOGA AVENUE AS A Mayor Aileen Kao LINE OF SARATOGA AVENUE 2924h (payable in full at If the Trustee is unable to creditors. contingent credi• consented to The proposed Planning Commission at, ar HISTORIC LANDMARK - NOES: None AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY the time of sale to T.O. comity title for any t...San, tors, and persons who may action.) The independent Prior lo, the public hearing. (APN 393 -05-0171 ABSENT: None CORNER OF THAT 1.00 Service Company) all right. - at be interested in 'administration authority will In order to be included in The City Council of the City ABSTAIN: NO. ACRE TRACT CONVEYED BY title and interest conveyed the successful bidder's sole the Wlll or estate, or both of be gamed unless an inter the Planning Commissions of Saratoga hereby ordains /s / Aileen Kao. Mayor E.M. HUNT TO LUDWIG to and now held by it under and exclusive remedy WILLIAM ARTHUR SANDEN. ested:Ini files alr objet• lMormation packets, written as follows: THOMY, BY DEED DATED said Deed of Trust in shalt be the return of monies ATTEST: AN AMENDED PETITION lion to the petition and Communications should Section I- Fmdingr. /s /Cathleen Boyer. APRIL t, 1870 AND the property hereinafter paid to the Trustee. and the FOR PROBATE has been filed shows good cause why the be pled on or before the After careful. review and City Clerk RECORDED APRIL 7. 1870 described: successful bidder shall have by MICHAEL T. SANDEN court should out {rant the Tuesday, a week bar.. the consideration al the report (pub SN 9126) IN BOOK 16 OF DEEDS, PAGE Trustor: TED SALAH, no further recourse. If avail in the Superior Court of .authority. - meeting. - and recommendations o(- - 621. RUNNING THENCE ELADM SALAH Recorded able, the expected opening California. County of SANTA. -.A HEARING on the petition- A site visit will be held on the the Heritage Preservation ALONG THE NORTHWESTER- December 22, 2000 as Instr. bid and /or postponement CLARA: w ill be held on OCTOBER M day preceding the hearing Commission concerning the LY LINE OF SAID SARATOGA No. 15504033 'n ,Bonk -- information may be obtained THE AMENDED PETITION - 2007. 9:00 a.m. to Dept. 15 dale listed above as parr property aaratoga Jj Trustee AVENUE SOUTH 49 DEG. 45' Page -- of Of icial RecoMS by calling the following FOR PROBATE requests that located at 191 North First St, or the standard Site Visit Avenue (143'112. pery) g Q WEST GO FEET TO A STAKE, in the office of the Recorder telephone numberls) on In MICHAEL T. SANDEN be San lose, CA 95113. Committee agenda. Site tats- togeverwith the applticalion. S61I4S AND BEING THE MOST EAST- Of SANTA CLARA County; daY before the sale: appointed as personal repre• IF YOU OBJECT 14 the granli• - in occur between and and supporting aterials, ERLY CORNER OF THE CALIFORNIA pursuant Lo (714) 480.5690 or you may sentalwe -to administer me ng of the petition, you' 5:00 p.m. The site visit is the City Council hereby PARCEL Of NND CONVEYED the Notice of Dataull and access sales information estate of the decedent. should appear al the hearing open to thepublic. determines (hat: - BY GEORGE T. OLDHAM, ET Election to 5.11 there under A HEARING On the Felton and stale your ab)eclions The Site VisHCammitmewitl • The Properly exempUfies Or NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE AI. TO HAMILTON MORGAN, ecorded June 13, 2007 as al www.ascenrex.com /web- will be Aetd on 10/12/07 nor fit, written objections convene at the City Hall 'reflects special elements of TS. N0.: 07.7160#7 BY DEED DATED MAY 18. lost, No. 19466234 i sales. at 9:00AM in Dept. 15 local- with the court before the - parking lot at 3:30 P.M. on the cultural, social econom• LOAN N0.: 06022So 1922, AND RECORDED Book -- Page - of TAC# 758168C ad at 191 NORTH FIRST ST., hearing. Yom appearance the day preceding the hear- ic, political, aesthetic, engt- YOU ARE IN BE FAULT SEPTEMDER 13. 1922. IN Official Records in the (Pub IN 9/19. 9/26.30/3) • • • Attachment 8 • 0, } TECHNICAL INFORMATION - • ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER APN: 517 -22 -071 8 072 • ADDRESS OF PROJECT: 15400 PEACH MILL ROAD R; 8 I'�� � N C E F �R SARATOGA. G 95070 -6N8 i ' i�:.J rJJ J� rJ ,,Ji • OWNER'S NAME ARIMIL /I�� and . • .COUNTY USE Ol lRA 0 r_"l�l Ifi d 8- I FF. _A821 d-lue L l ZONING DISTRICT: R140 PARCEL 1, . 15400 PEACH HILL ROAD SIZE OF LOT. PCL 1 76,535 SO. FT. 2 GLOSS 68.650 SO. FT. t NET SARATOGA, CA. 95070 SIZE OF LOT: PCL 2 43.647 SO. FT. t GROSS 40,032 SO. FT. t NET AVG. SITE SLOPE PCL 1 1B.9; j 1 N \ \� �\ �\ _ •�n•, AVM;. SITE SLOPE: PCL 2 27.4% b�Ip_ —� \ . \ I /' FO ] 4' Y \, • INDICATES DATA FROM FIRST AMERICAN WAN DATAS/ REFERENCES �� 'rr°y > r' (A) 205- M- 40 - -_- (8) FIRST AMERICAN PRLM ORDER/ NCS- 80179 -SC AgIYk� 517 (FOETID /r • INDICATES SURVEY MONUMENT. FOUND AS NOTED `)n•l� -' —"- �'-' � \(" � /� O INDICATES SET 3/4" IRON POPE. LS 5418 ( ) INDICATES RECORD DATA PER RUM CE TABLE ,% � 1�_� ✓_ j �'' - i� _ 1 ��'" '" z" �.� _iMn ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS PIEREOF. BASIS OF f1FYA710N4 / _ THE BASS F NS FOR THIS /. � --J _ w 3A•"- _ _ �% ,/ % j �.}. -'S� �.. MAP IS TAKEN L FROM FROM MA USGS WAD MAP q9O "" BASIS OF BEARINGS Jj(` /. �/� In BEARINGS ARE BASED UPON FOUND MONUMENTS _ . l AS SHOWN ON MAT MAP FILED IN VOLUME 205 OF MAPS AT PAGE 40, SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDS, AND ESTABLISHED BETWEEN MONUMENTS FOUND NOTE: CAREY APN 517 -22 -112 -q /a - - -/ • Y / /j / 550 -PM -33 THE BOUNDARY AND EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS - DRAWING ARE BASED SOLELY UPON INFORMATION / i_. • ! f/k 6R .*198 J S' - r CONTAINED IN THE REFERENCE DOCUMENTS. NO LIABILITY 15 ASSUMED BY DUNBAR k CRAIG FOR THE EASTENCE / , /� - / • ` /' �jj" ,�'' "' OF ANY EASEMENTS. ENCUMBRANCES. DISCREPANCIES IN ' /,� �/ -N LEVFI--F'F- 509.G5• BOUNDARY OR O1IE DEFECTS NOT MENTIONED IN SMD O �ASgL I Atr "a9RLt 50675 - __i lN5RO.58pA DOCUMENTS AND THEREFORE NOT SHOWN ON THIS / /J ' DRAINING. 6A-RA6E 14S TOPOGRAPHIC MAP REPRESENTS THE CONDITIONS OF THE SITE AT THE TIME THE SURVEY FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED AND SHOWS SURFACE OBJECTS ONLY. �!•• / / F / // / L // 5� i SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES IF ANY• INCLUDING BUT NOT ]/• k LIMITED TO FOUNDATIONS PILINGS, UNDFRCdtOUND TANKS AND UNDERGROUND UTILITY LING MAY NOT BE SHOWN. / / P / % I - F/N.6y1D. SOC:O ! aP I r POLE UN E EASEMENT PER PRELIMINARY REPORT NOT ' PLOTTED ON THIS NAP. /ja1 \• � \1 1 \� a' aoc'e\ � �'O•� d� '� ;avm /I �P� � I n� � �. ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS M 3/4V LS z69a % LOT SIZE: 66,650 SQ. FT. NET (-IS AC) Fo 3 /a• P orw - AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: 18.9 %ROUNDED UP TO 19.0% eF.VS NbIWW a FO y.y srAKE 10% (6885 SD. FT.) + 2% X 9 = 18% (12,357 SO. FT.) = 19222 SD. Ft. REDUCTION 1 SLOPE FT. ADJUSTMENT NET 19 3� ,•�, 68,650 SQ, 222 SQ FT REDUCTION 49,423 SQ. FT. ADJUSTED NET LOT SIZE wr 49,423 SQ. FT, ROUNDED UP TO 50,000 SQ. FT. 1 LOT ALLOWS: 6,000 SO. FT. 10 X 20 = 200 SQ. FT. _r I_ ALLOWABLE 6,200 SO. FT. T�F 10% ADDITIONAL FOR SECOND TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR EA � 6,820 SO. FT. LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS PER _ SECTION 15 -06.090 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA COUNTED 1026 SO. FT.(23 %) LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA NOT COUNTED 3421 $Q. FT 177 %) TOTAL LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 4447 SO. FT.(100 %) - MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA 5673 SO. FT. LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 1026 SO. FT TOTAL FLOOR AREA 6699 SQ. FT. MAAIMUM ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA 6820 SO. FT. la. ti 1 .rTT9 � l HUSAIN/KHAN APN 517 -22 -111 550 -PM -32 - _ F L I GRAPHIC SCALE d. 1 Imk _ ra n I f, PROJECT DATA AWESOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: PARCEL 1. 517 -22 -072 PROJECT ADDRESS: 15100 PEACH HILL ROAD SARATOGA G 95070 PROPERTY OWNER: V ARIMILU AM SITA ARIMILU 139w CHESTER AVENUE SARATOGA. CA 95070 - PROJECTSCOPEOFWORK CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE INCLUDING A SECOND UNIT AND BELOW GRADE PARKING GAPAGE EXISTING ZONING: 8140 EXISTING USE: VACANT LAND PROPOSED USE: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOT SIZE: 76.535 Sp. FT. GROSS (1.8 AC) 80.650 SQ, FT NET (1 B AC) AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: SLOPE AT STRUCTURE 5.8% ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 6.82G SO. FT. PROPOSED FLOOR AREA 6.69950 FT OW SITE COVERAGE AS FOLL S BUILDING COVERAGE 5.69250 FT. 8% PORCHES PATIO AND WALKWAYS DRIVEWAYS 1.778 SO FT. 3% 619 Sp FT. 1% 3.13SSO.FT. 4% FIRE TRUCK TURN AROUND TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 2 —SQ FT 4% 13,BS 50. FT. 2G% LANDSCAPE ­I NATURAL OPEN SPACE: TOTAL V 776 °^ FT. 8096 BB,65G 50 Fi. 100% LOWEST ELEVATION POINT AT BUILDING EDGE 4910' HIGHEST ELEVATION POINT AT BUILDING EDGE AVERAGE ELEVATION POINT AT BUILDING EDGE 514.0' WST TOP MOST ELEVATION POINT OF THE STRUCTURE 5315 BUILDING SETBACKS PROPOSED IMNIMUM FRONT -WEST: REAR - EAST: 42 FT. ]OFT. SB FT. SOFT. LEFT SIDE NORTH: RIGHT SIDE - SOUTH: 117 FT. 201. wFT. mFT. - am' FVno � n SEP " 4.007 CITY SARATOGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APN: 517- Z2 -071. h 072 - REV 19E0_ AUfi. 2007 BABUARY k TOPotlIM4FC.YM 6lIJID6 R DUNBAR and CRAIG LA]o LICENSED LANG AA7 F SURVEYORS PARCELS 1 ! 2 2]6 k SNITA 0- : SMIE F. 2J5 -M -40 a La,, �l el� slmn. a �I Safi SARATOGA ..a.,L� &a I.c wo WaeaaPL vA1E r/>oJa.w camr a v.m nw sw ar ulamM '. �.E or c.A14 °4� s1LE �1 rxw - m FFFT OBArAk 4N9 / Gfc ,m rv. Betz /7 DAIS APPA. 2007 OIEOttR RJC eaSFIG SAKTA �— FRtDMVIX: KS AS ACAO N0. 071124.n F1£ N0. L7 L7 "'OF 10' • _ _ ELI RAO � , 15400 PEACH HILL ROAD 1 SARATOGA, CA. 95070 SEE LLJ , s. i1 O `t NL iseoo 1 x f U LEGEND - 1Ra m Z. - _. _ _ J �,. .._ 1 ,.� pnmxc Nforoav _ WAIN — Z n — — oa — Um SEWER lwlE - _� _l' J —G— GAS 1 O — — — s - � wzm,' � / :� i' ;,_. - A,6.,-:.ne - ) -- `y_ -.• �_ -r" w —W— We N in c � , T � .. wen 51�... , - - a��1z � ;��� -J ... � �'r F�"\ l —... — s� aw,fcE mwau � Z m � . z J a SfT fE1SF cd ED 3/4- .P oPEx k 5E• .xta / `{ ( 'ai 195.70 __1.,, -. STIW BALE ;" : I. ;' »..x ,� .� :. Iwa sos.a �SOe.�'R -N BOawo :.c. ;pa ca• 5N - _ - f r, �._.__ .. -- Y ® N+u puN - �'1 r G.SCd OC x »6q1 - _ .e6.y/ _ - - _..� Y - =� R . wN • , - yr, z _ r , a � _,-i O O � % yy R9I SOB: i 508.90 W. r \S ...._. — / �., Op S.D. MA INY + oo T ; �'_ _- �' Z l .o: WATER w CO..W..x /�y� Z 0 OTN &pIDWC M OftNE1fAY .a 3 CIIT -100 C.Y. -74 L.Y. 2 C.Y. -1588 L.Y. 0 eE 5 Hs556W,q!w . 5CD1A , n flll +6b C.Y. +162 C.Y. feJ C.Y. 4869 C.T. / RD TOT& +NO C.Y. +BB C.Y, -1015 L.Y. -713 C.Y. /OT& ExPORT - 7n C.Y. ZZ' FOR EW7 WMNG MM04M µ0 H Iff& EOGTON SEE I NIIECIIAUI SIZE PUN n . Site Plan SOME: 1• - 20' ,1 reEar, 24' bn9 0 18' O.C. D< TW - pALL SURFACE FOR MIEN _ (�1•,:0•� SEE PVN iqt ME SIZE 2 I —I - NEM SUaST XE WlH DRNNINE BRUNO SEE PUN �' f SM ratWR Mb Rope 2' min. - GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES u, iu sHNi Iw caraTalcTm N uYERS. na mosE 1NL0T63 rc EvN urea a fu w1BOk Nm1w - -� 1 .I_� — . mwACmx SkV1 NOr 00FEn EIM11 (a) caws OµiEIED f1115 SHaLL Sa&F WSSES.OE NELL (2) 1'R MM SWCES 0 1 III III —III - . 1. eRRnc s LwAV.fllom Au m1NGmox aRAOfw Arm EYGYATW sxrAE eE N AaoROVwt wnx nw N1savAnx wroews RNmEO io .au¢err lu,Fxius N• To nw wT1RN.s ox aww TNEr Nsr, fits swu NEw s' ro - - ff63wR 0.YWBlIS IIA Tw IwNFl NF.LL NI6,GtI0x IwFAf FOR 11 S sflE. BE Ed0E1FM m SIPPdrt MaY8A1FD NNS NO BE SN9E Ai RE 06Cx EIOPLS 90YN W ME PWb. ANiILW RIP RM ROCK I I I I I I_ I I ' TOP Of J -pUN W PROPaI OaA'NACE RNO OaOR MPRONMR YGwNS SNIIl RE TMEX m FISMw Tw CNfRNINC INIELNO' OE I 1_ —I 2 iwla OBSWMTOk ORIaNO OPFR11Rx5 SHOAO ff -YONE. µD 1f51Fa N A ME _.)ENE iR0(1 g,c .I I'I I I I 6EORaaxu B1CIwiplG mwARr fOR o]w'am [ NN n1EN REMM1010'1mNS No ME PPa,FCT BM5/ 1a AU nts aPU ¢ oNwitwO naowxour nwN. Fuu elBa m A MNORN a wxmTwE (m) I I t ,_ 1 I , I I I' � � I I .I � � �� � I I � I I i - IMAM bO 1tlRNNWN aO wx Z � sfnsdmrs. T� NaM wcwots s,E PawRAio15. sfaEanls aF fRlS. c,ArAlwllr Am OONPAOI0t5 a W Roa fRSS 5E4W.OF. eASF%1CKMA Idl- EOYipIE f11S Saf30Ra NORRGTIdT SNVL BE d411 m EMwOw PETCEM K 1NweN ORY dt611Y A5 OER0IRSD BY RST 11ETp0 N0. C01F. Z1R-F OR aINOi &lEIaNR .,l ),� T I III— W (o Imw1 aE a vzarEmT Ofl5E1NFD AW IESRD ar TE SOl EMw[BL 1011005 APPRaOD Bl Tw fi1RID51G Ofi1CP1 SUfFOwA T61 SwLL H Y1S fiN RFASOWRLE A55WNCE Of OOfIRW10E 111111 Tw 300 REPOn Eal MS F0O£Ol. ) �' - Existing grade I -) ! —� I I =1 i- 1' -D'. MIN. 1 uTmrAmaw WVNC TO CalIP TOR SHLLS MOmT' -151. u1✓f1W7Yakm SEMME AlFali Ai Tl Mk(800) ,0. ALL C11T AND iR1 4pES IAE ro E PWRED W11X iao51611 - RF95bN11iOC1ArI0N...WO OEEARS 51pM1 BLTCR FABRIC T - }• CUNTNVE I \ \ —CIASS 11 PERWBfF BKKTYL .// 2MIwllml'NO f05TN0 bUHOFAGRMMO OMw91a0c UO`AGM.M NORM iat liw PURPoY tlf ,OGT80 uxCOgPNG il.Ntt `A LU .NO O El Tf p S @x 0. , f mb lt W R m 0. ,N.r 1. p6 RCOR Me 5Ar0PwPx aICOaRWR OCcNaONwm11RR TaNw n X /LJ y l. 1. . 1_6 � �•WN R _XE M T RiNSR II gWcI I CN w 0 P� R GJfREr1IDE0r8E 5 WE% OfAfN:NE L ,9m SLru WF a N OroORFx lx f fs PFg TAo N w IFuXmE w AmTRdoOR F ONaL 10 Md PLfaOMNV P T �_ '-fi -0 - 1 Detail m cFOr EIRD mF aw w pI 6EO0. rRN R EA C OYRN0NMU1 ,07x X S S cAaWAnT A a . f zx lL wI, o f uBx Y m m 9uar 1w0 G µNS5 TI E o RPOR Rm lO 0Pl N wN0 S a E O A R n £C SRoIENmD a O na w 1E• D s1 UamTEfcSRw $ a0. nM YlWoI rM r lOs Nf PWE E RY wWGr S9 TSA11yv2/wS ,1R 0aON . w f 2 - f6 O o9N11sa1ns m A 1-r1w oRAw,ER aasEO oR1+uAw m1RwiTm m Rw-mo BwROi• olsswfn5s <OMWEIFC BY,OCIOBfA , x a fACH KAR Nw m MtNIF aD' BY NsEN1ATIM aE wuwEO Flp3ox. scv.e: N.r.s. - 5U0SI1FI OIWN 5' c W S Rw SR fiE WIwED AT IE011N0 (x) MMMNO dYS PIMq ro /wi 511E ClF /A110 pr N.EWaON NA STD'ENf WHIFM'ffAM6' N9W 9W1. eE 'VgfMED N OJOD RfPiA n1gO,1GM 110 !PRR mLlOMNO' � P twtf 5 PR 1•N PERFdG1ED PYC PIPE G Q. O 11. ME OPIDRF dFnfRON W ME PNwfwtt N ORDER m ENwRE PRCPpf SiPwFlxG a AFfACE COMAWdTD N0 •!IL C01Mro' w/ F0.1ER i/8Q0 N W1FmLL Ai0 ro WO w— ME PORN NRN ME 4P3L60 Cp,F&1Nf N Tw WE1D. , :'� .'A• \ \ < 0) R. IPPR03Al Q T15 R1µ 006 NTw calwfn ANY wOns OF BTpT ro EOMEA PUR00 PROPIXtt OR Tw R PPGPEIItt OF OR016. APPRO/AL OE T6 IFN AL50 ORS XOf C016mU1E NNrow. a AXY ANG" PoPSR� - PAVE -IAENj AREAS RESIJITW K OUT OF PAVEMETIT CD Y EwNAfIwInS rROPOSTO R1fRO.➢10R5 APE wawa m RawN AlA IPPRP:N tH Tw RE5PN19NF AundmES uo Au oT1wT REDUMD FER1ms swu eE aNAwa. xEw B• oRMN ftlPE W/ ,EE t y - PER CnY STµdRD - 1 A y ,Ql 3 M w Po W ME I [EE p M 6. I E M L c ✓DIXw fR51d9LL RO 0 11F PfmNIFE d AGNT SN4L YMRIa= INE s1afE15, AIA ALL OOEA if.WK NP15- OG-FMT N A QFNI. 'n', I - ps[ LI '��� /�l-• } 5• �/ ID U ME P11N12Y aMFO /ROPERlY Ea00 roMIRUC,ON AI• UPoII C016lETONM IEIE PRPIECI. AOYJM , � ( SL OMPN / O n YO, N IL EE PTRIWE (2) R iEE LS B PEIR 0.REPO � / m Ra ' 9. Y W6® B W/ PAMM PER ' R9 •�Y ^ V^ 4E Md Y iRw1BBlR NBR INPNSxIY LSaWtNll n FY I 501 RV= ! i5A1t I0. N Tw mi. W, MMNI IwWWS A10/M MTeV1 W1F3fL5 Alw foam. Nt Pltl\IFLI- RFIAlFO �,•_5•�1' -g'- -� S2 OF v W 04127E o m ORIY. 05/21/07 COSIOLION SN040 C0.Y NIf101 A m0 -NIOf WDIh. Tw WHfPICI011 ,5WL1• R69YM. m SE, N )0303 W,__ SYEIY ME SFL1G1 309391 a OE PVaC RESOURCE DOE d ME STAR OF - , —5-0• g ', cICRE(E PIER * E)(P.�DI 0_* CMrJaE BAZ COOC GIROWlA 1101fY TE CMMIY OF SMTA CWM NNaV,1FEY. °d .L .. TA2. It.,6UN OOS NNPPOE Tw RBg4 O5PPNPMR TwF RRM PN5x0 VE1NW5 R ' TwF FAf.SENAlIOM SMCOrD FE 08fwkD {R011 Tw Ott Q SNaTl09 RµNNO OFPwrtu9M . -. � q ?aCAffO orT_a By T.N.H. ,x. u zua m5unxc B9+nn m956 wx1W: ROfR m vR.E d 9slm xu ® ®,NS mai9x io - - PWE e. sE RETAINING WALL ON PIERS TYP ,moo minr Nnx nr9Raaem RECa6emlMNS rw nRS fROwa. ! . A(t1MR11 -03 11 l@991NY1 R Q.xOfO WIEr1,E5 ro IlE MOCxm ro OR 511E 90u110N. MOR ALL dTAV3 9NL ff wsEX m A MY d f01N1Y N9MUm SoC. - - Detail ' Detail Detail . 4 1/2 . 1' -0 SCAE REVlSEp;AUG. 23, 2ooT.. ":: a ws eNu 4A: LJ sm�m �i �i 0 a 0 ® J O J_ � = N �NF J y �W u 19 y 4. DRAWN CMQCKQO owr A UG. 2v 007 JOB O. B22 - 07, ewQar op /0 9RQQT6 • • Fgti� C 4 LEFT SIDE ELEVATION - NORTH SGAL.E.; I /8n a 11, pu 1 cl I BUILDING MATERIALS ♦ TWO PIECE CLAY TILE ROOF ♦ STUCCO EXTERIOR w/ STONE ACCENT ♦ BRICK COLUMNS t I ♦ DECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON GUARDRAIL.ING ♦ METAL GUTTERS & DOWN5FOUT5 ♦ WOOD FRAME WINDOWS & DOORS ♦ WOOD 5ECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS VIEW • STAINED WOOD RAFTER TAILS • STAINED WOOD SHUTTERS ELEV-. _447.01 LCWES P T'b /fyT :. AT .. THE CV=14G:: • . ED6E.:. _. . FRONT ELEVATION - WEST ELE�_,. ELEV. 514.0' ELEV. 508.0 t- i �E LEV. 5055' T ELEV 498.Or I The p pedexp mjw igs The PsoP^sd Proled is mmidrnt with At the following Design 2eview findings slated in ' 'Saratoga he' mipal Code Section 1545.080: (a) Arvid enrmsexebfe ie-fc —m ,irh vi— and p'un'y. This finding an b<m.d, i. the affirmative m Nat she proposal home will not nmeasonsbly inter( with neighboring sieves or privacy m then it will be loaned on an approximately 1.8 Doss rim with swrounding purls also m oars of an a,e. The purposed residence would only be visible from the home a mass she s(rx oral thehmneso Jae fen Nat is tesemed by esbU, vcgration and new p'hewd tree would MA & additional screening. Behind the pmpv;W building she site slopes down to a drainage charmd and the dense lm&mping in this ores blocks any views in this s— hum dfsita. The Pared to the sight is sank The baiiding is placed toward the 5om of the lot kheay providing i,,,,,d setbads Nan the minimsun inquired by the hfanidpal Cdc. 1 (b) Prcsrrw A'emmr fandsr.ye This finding may be made in lbe affirmative in that Ndu is no —M lemdsreping tp p .scr- on Nc ale. The site is m—M with ve grasses and 18 existing tans that arc p—e,l by City Ordinance. Five of these tree will be removed for the mnswction eC he purposed residence and ould be replaced by ne The r ning Gees that ould be impacted by the proposed w ould be p-4—sing cans —ion. The purpose' pmjd will be imsroduct og new drought ruler rat Isdsmping to the s m Nat ould include both native and omammtal bushes and trees that would indude a numb, of 24" hex sad trees. t (c)Presmr elhc and Nrrirage Trees Thisf dingmaybemadeintheaRmmd- in Nat uisting ram e. the lot include 18 trees that arc pmlesd by City Ordinance 15 -050 and w Wd be posmtmlly impeded by the purposed mnswction. The projas is proposing so remove five trar Nat svwid be in eonnid with the motion of the rdidrnm. The Cily Adwriat has dete -ined Nat ail bus otm is in far or p- h-14h and should be rmnoved with new trca. The. appiimnt hss uprvsed a .- iltingncss to rebate the msst live oak to els —here on the site h--, the City Arbotist haz detennind Nat that Nc tree may fiat survive being reloatd ad it would be a more prvdmt choitt to rcpiatt Ne cosst live oak with a new mazt live oak vice Thc CityA ria hssr— '),at rcpt .-cmrnt tines area velum � m of 87,960. Prior to building l—it issvanm the applicvrce..W be sryvirc 'u submit a bond w Ne City in the amount of 895,560 s +hies is equal to the apprvsed .slue of Use trees Nat arc to rem, n. This money will be, fdM to the theseans upon mme'ths d t the W. and an, the — Arborist hss inzp jmt _ thcac ce, nand rode N<ddetmimalion Nat they wax not damaged dosing project (d) Mmbf 4 pe pde. f rs'rssive balk. This finding may be made in the affinndive in Nat he appliam is proposing a residence with a wide building f print while placing below pad, the garage and some of the Ruing Waco. Propose' exterior. -teals would imdude both smcm and tumml done A .—earth -rune wlor'pald will be usd for the stun, window trim, dm's, are' roofing ma coals. To firth — ... the perception of bulk the purposed ;e jot would be well anie.lemd and ddaled and will include varying moraines,.4 A se, &/146 pmjwing archimdumt cl=am /aw pitcned root. arrNed svod windewz, aM (e) C, r,,sdbfe bulk end height. This finding may be made in the affirmative u that fhe prsyosefhonte yws v /eve Ptah/, t— flirt,, archis,tuml der. ling. /eve pimh of the roof, and the min of estexior matd'als } would minimize the visual pcmWtm of bulk. Tb, low height would nil 1 have a negative impact - neighboring lots givm Ne large whelks aM existing and proposal vegetative —ing hom the existing home on the left sod the house in clozdl pmximity is loand m the opposite of Peach Hill Raad. (f) C.— grading and,aslen contra( mnfsods This f ding may be made to the aM..twe in thus the appliant haz wbmlbd s ps Wieg and drainage plan, which —p— a,p.p iste grading and erasion .mint methods; ad the proposal shell ...farm to the City's current gilding ad erasion —1.1 standards (9) Drag. Peffd and rcchnfgee This finding may be made in the aRms its 'I that Ne propose' Projms conforms to the appliable ddipt palidae sod "ique in he Residential Deign Handbook in terms o[ mmpdibk bulk, and svidimg anreasoeable mterfcrenee with privacy and views. rt� ' "'AT- -THE':bb/LOPN6:. EDGE_. K 4, [F '0 @ Ir 0 @ Im 3. �1 a MON a J J O J �? U, V IL _1 O a . RolloQ J ff{ 0 Ix a IL ctawwra eaueageo M. O: -AOG. 2007 , gec��f .atx wo. swear oil �Q ea+eere RIGHT SIDE. ELEVATION - SOUTH Ile I, tl BUILDING MATERIALS ♦ TWO PIECE CLAY TILE ROOF " I • STUCCO EXTERIOR w/ STONE ACCENT ♦ BRICK COLUMNS ♦ DECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON GUARDRAILING ♦ METAL GUTTERS & DOWNSPOUTS ♦ WOOD FRAME WINDOWS & DOORS VIEW ♦ WOOD SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS ♦ STAINED WOOD RAFTER TAILS ♦ STAINED WOOD SHUTTERS - REAR ELEVATION - EAST 5ra,>a _ 11P - II - Ou view 1 orr Yf 1 -, J 1 a 0 J J n in x� W V Eg7�� Q a O N M r� T� J W Q d OP4WN JK I . K .Neck.. M.0.- 04T6 Aue. 2007 scum J06 NO. 422 -07 eNeaT L !O 9N0GT9 • 0 MAIN LEVEL LOWER LEVEL. 1. 3'-Oj' x 3' -0'= 9.0 2. 20' -0' x 42' -0' = 840.0 3. 28' -0' x 7'-6' = 210.0 4. 13'-6' x 3' -0' = 41.0 5. 35' -0' x 31'-6' = 1103.0 6. 17' -0' x 10'-O'= 170.0 7. T -0 j x 4' -0' = 12.0 8. 18' -0' x 44' -0" = 792.0 9. 17'-0" x 6' -0' = 102.0 10. 14'6 "x 2' -0' = 29.0 11. 40' -0" x 38' -0' = 1520.0 12. 19' -0' x 4'-(r= 76.0 13. 11' -0" x 6'-G"= 66.0 14. 6' -0' x 2'-6' = 15.0 15. 27' -0' x 24'-0' = 648.0 16. 6'-61 x 2' -6' = 16.0 17. 2' -0" x 12'-O'= 24.0 1 5673.0 SQ. FT. MAIN LEVEL LIVING AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 16. 2040' x 35'-6' = 710.0 19. 15'-6"x 4' -0' = 62.0 20. 30' -0' x 28' -6" = 855.0 21. 26' -0' x 2'-W= 65.0 22. 23 it ' x 22'-6" = 529.0 2221.0 SO. FT. LOWER LEVEL LIVING AREA A. 20' -0' x 17' -0' = 340.0 8. 14' ?0" x 3'-O'= 42.0 _ C. 17' -0' x 3'-W= 51.0 D. 39'-0' x 22'-0' = 658.0 E. 13;-6' x 2'-6'= 34.0 F. 24' -0' x 10'-O'= 240.0 G. 29'-,0' x 21'-0' = 6090 H. 17'-0' x 2'-0' = 34.0 I. 12' -0' x 1'-6' = 18.0 i 2226.0 SQ. FT. BELOW GRADE GARAGE AREA l) i ,I .G3ooq C�O�� �i 104 0 'J O J i8 = 01 W 0 IL t0 V J W IL V TRr ff: A4.0- AUG 2009 JO9 O. U.� \OT ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS LOT SIZE: 68,650 SQ. FT. NET (1.6 AC) AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: 18.9% ROUNDED UP TO 19.0% 10% (6865 SQ. FT.) + 2% x 9 = 18% (12,357 SQ. FT.) = 19.222 SQ. FT. REDUCTION SLOPEADJUSTMENT 68;650 SO. FT. NET 19,222 SQ. FT. REDUCTION - 49,423 SO. FT. ADJUSTED NET LOT SIZE 49,423 SQ. FT. ROUNDED UP TO 50,000 SQ. FT. LOT ALLOWS: 6,000 SQ. FT. 10 X 20 = 200 SQ. FT. ALLOWABLE 6,200 SQ. FT. 10% ADDITIONAL FOR SECOND UNIT 620 SQ. FT. ` TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA 6,820 SQ. FT. LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS PER SECTION 15- 06.090 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA COUNTED 1026 SO. FT.(23 %) LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA NOT COUNTED 3421 SQ. FT.(77 %) TOTAL LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 4447 SQ. FT.(100 %) MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA 5673 $0. FT. LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 1026 SQ. FT. TOTAL FLOOR AREA 6699 SO. FT. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA 6820 SO. FT. • 0 MAIN LEVEL LOWER LEVEL. 1. 3'-Oj' x 3' -0'= 9.0 2. 20' -0' x 42' -0' = 840.0 3. 28' -0' x 7'-6' = 210.0 4. 13'-6' x 3' -0' = 41.0 5. 35' -0' x 31'-6' = 1103.0 6. 17' -0' x 10'-O'= 170.0 7. T -0 j x 4' -0' = 12.0 8. 18' -0' x 44' -0" = 792.0 9. 17'-0" x 6' -0' = 102.0 10. 14'6 "x 2' -0' = 29.0 11. 40' -0" x 38' -0' = 1520.0 12. 19' -0' x 4'-(r= 76.0 13. 11' -0" x 6'-G"= 66.0 14. 6' -0' x 2'-6' = 15.0 15. 27' -0' x 24'-0' = 648.0 16. 6'-61 x 2' -6' = 16.0 17. 2' -0" x 12'-O'= 24.0 1 5673.0 SQ. FT. MAIN LEVEL LIVING AREA LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 16. 2040' x 35'-6' = 710.0 19. 15'-6"x 4' -0' = 62.0 20. 30' -0' x 28' -6" = 855.0 21. 26' -0' x 2'-W= 65.0 22. 23 it ' x 22'-6" = 529.0 2221.0 SO. FT. LOWER LEVEL LIVING AREA A. 20' -0' x 17' -0' = 340.0 8. 14' ?0" x 3'-O'= 42.0 _ C. 17' -0' x 3'-W= 51.0 D. 39'-0' x 22'-0' = 658.0 E. 13;-6' x 2'-6'= 34.0 F. 24' -0' x 10'-O'= 240.0 G. 29'-,0' x 21'-0' = 6090 H. 17'-0' x 2'-0' = 34.0 I. 12' -0' x 1'-6' = 18.0 i 2226.0 SQ. FT. BELOW GRADE GARAGE AREA l) i ,I .G3ooq C�O�� �i 104 0 'J O J i8 = 01 W 0 IL t0 V J W IL V TRr ff: A4.0- AUG 2009 JO9 O. U.� \OT __CROSS . SECTION . C. ;Z;7L77,go. = _I, -oit wav�e�oNa er C Q 90 ol J J O _ W = N _ 0> W V a ac ao J N W V Oi1AWN O T8 7 /g�tsAf -Oeo.. JOG NO aNaeT OR �Q GNGGTG 'NOw T 70 45E n l zCLuclrD iN r.✓i E z ', g L✓ a, �N .. i. i R.O.ISoY n FLOOR AREA PER ZONING REGGLAT /ON 15'06.090 ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS PER SECTION 45- 06.090 LOT SIZE: 68,650 SQ. FT. NET (1.6 AC) AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: 18.9% ROUNDED UP TO 19.0 %. - 10% (6865 SQ. FT.) + 2% x 9 = 18% (12,357 SO. FT.) = 19222 SQ. FT. REDUCTION LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA COUNTED 1026 SO. FT.(23 %) SLOPE ADJUSTMENT LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA NOT COUNTED 3421 SQ. FT.(77 %) 68,650 SQ. FT. NET - . - TOTAL LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 4447 SQ. FT.(100 %) 19.222 SQ. FT. REDUCTION 49,423 SQ. FT. ADJUSTED NET LOT SIZE MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA 5673 SQ. FT. 49,423 SO. FT. ROUNDED UP TO 50,000 SQ. FT. LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA 1026 SO. FT. TOTAL FLOOR AREA 6699 80. FT. LOT ALLOWS: 6,000 SQ. FT. 10X20 = 200 SQ. FT. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA 6820 SQ. FT. ALLOWABLE 6,200 SQ. FT.. wav�e�oNa er C Q 90 ol J J O _ W = N _ 0> W V a ac ao J N W V Oi1AWN O T8 7 /g�tsAf -Oeo.. JOG NO aNaeT OR �Q GNGGTG 11,114' .70 WON, 08 IPA iN, LK 6" W.0 w off: I Malilk 2 I • � 1 U • APN: 517- 22 -O71 s 072 __. RE 1115E0 Ay6. 20"7: NI041O,T' � 1oPOrnrP1IC wP v L—S. DUNBAR and CRAIG ARIMILLI LICENSED LAID SlMrfOH5 PAS I ! 2 a c4 xa k ANTA .aAa ,c. — Pa las atrs. a mom seae..r. NIB ( a7 aw -aaaa SAIiAld1A aKrr as: r/s/za �b w su+r.wn sw a canbxe \10 � v� : i as - m rtcr wawa sx / aw .m wn on12 emrx: 1wrtA aAU RLE — _. wic ,wna. zon ainwawe «s •s aEn®: ac new wu anl2m.s.r C7 E "il F- n 6 t oat r ELEV. 531.5 ELE�.. ELEV. 508.0 , ELEV V. 5065 _ ELEV 41'6.o' t T.. 4 0 L4WEST,potwr AT E HE 7, ' .. G ED6E FRONT ELEVATION - WEST �m �i �i kl ° . WQ O X J O = N x� W V �Oa � q0 U7 I- W� a d ,ar_n�E BCirtp>y6. �_.. coa: o'-Eirnsw- QRAOF; '; J OUTLINE OF PREVIOUS TO l._. G CK60 � M.O. o DESIGN RETCECTED 8Y. ALr7.2 00' THE PLANNING COMMON SSION 422 ° 07 " e�er 1Eo@w &ftmg 90 ro i� aweere A U3 .p�'` � % --- _ d - - -- I J,.,.� 1 { _ .,,'ter, j \ ti Ul Iv LU S. PA K-- L AL f `\ c !ny i iii `v\V` - - - , i - ( f - -- }- ._.___ OWN- Ou A^ AN my—I -E) tit 51 y G � �} L"�5 b � ta5 �) fs � j1 �• � � "V J b° L"6 � t v � C� b %".Y� � ..`� �� 1 � ' �� S;p - -,� 1' T - ____ -_ ___._ __.____- __- \ �;`�. � -__ _ __Y_ \�``•...�,.t wy, ow `,, Ga G � rt '� � tl �`s '� ` � y G i� G � ` � G F `'�~ �� '� -,.. �•., � I i ' _ - - - -- �__^ -�.__ - - - - -- 'q Cr "S ''.. ! \^ "`'�° n SITE _- -`-- _ -- -- -- j '\ N U Yd 0 4" 00 LAS 4- jZ ej Ci rli� 66 �s iv 130' Z' �c O C4 n rA, I y G t 7 9 b �! C Z CA =J)- NA 4= OT 0 J, P.1 ci 1, oj *Ji S-1 0', 4. CW 3 10 11, • 0 • 4. C4 L"ql) , U 0 0 4. 1,"� 4., :� 1 0 CA j7 k k\ a bN a Sag ci cio � t� ", I M;A 4 a �\- 0 0 k i u ",q 4& 4 -"A) CA .Ci c 6 Ci C4 ts tj CJ ri 4d k� - � c a i� j; u a Ls a, u .,y I �- u a lu -y4i 00 0, - . v C% c i _0 goo— C, ci #A iq y US Ao 46 ci o w #6 -1 U 0 0 tq C4 ci $Iles G. lip a, CA ci kNci 4. kN U91 I CJ eVJ �Plrj CL, ci PIZA 14 1 L41S lz L's 16 La 6 AP L 16 es w To kL c k� Ci k\ C4 ♦ k\ f- Cj Z5 Z IN A A ts rj 6 DIA 4CJ 16 a 1,6 0 ♦ c 16 c 0 41 C% 01 C% LA 41 60 90 11 to a rt 61 us kN CJ \U t6g js tga 7 , z. ------- • • REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION I Application No./Location: Applicant/Owner: Staff Planner: Type of Application: Date: APN: Department Head: Item 3 App # 07-126/PSP07-0002 12033 Miller Avenue/19550 Prospect Road Church of the Ascension (Diocese of San Jose) Suzanne Thomas, Assistant Planner Freestanding Sign October 10, 2007 386-35-069 John F. Livingstone, AICP 12033 Miller Avenue/19550 Prospect Road I t AVE.. ---- WV. -4 —4- –4, ---------- -- 12033 Miller Avenue/19550 Prospect Road ---------- -- 1955 Pro' I Avenue Prospect 12033 Miller Avenue APN: 386-35-069 LAD 500' Radius 3, 31; ' M 12033 Miller Avenue/19550 Prospect Road a 3, 31; ' M N 12033 Miller Avenue/19550 Prospect Road Application No. 07- 1261PSP07 0002; 12033 Miller Avenue/19550 Prospect Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY: Application filed: 10/04.06 Notice published: 09/26/07 Application complete: 09/18/07 Mailing completed: 09/19/07 Posting completed: 10/04/07 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests approval for Sign Permit with Variations to Standards to construct a 22 square -foot, externally - illuminated, single- sided, freestanding identification sign in the R -1 -10 district. *The high density urethane architectural foam sign will be mounted on a stone block base and painted light beige with brown lettering, which will match the colors on the adjacent church buildings. The combined sign and base will be approximately five feet high and eight feet wide. The text will spell out "Church of the Ascension Roman Catholic" and will include the times of the worship services. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the project with conditions. • -2- Application No. 07- 1261PSP07- -0002; 12033 Miller Avenua119550 Prospect Road 0 STAFF ANALYSIS • ZONING: R -1 -10 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Community Facility Sites (CFS) MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE: Approximately 318,000 square feet AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: Average slope of the lot is less than 10% GRADING REQUIRED: No grading of the site is proposed MATERIALS AND COLORS: The high density urethane architectural foam sign will be mounted on a stone block base and painted beige with brown lettering, which will match the colors on the adjacent church buildings. Fluorescent lighting will be directed toward the sign and screened by the light fixtures and the vegetation. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed new sign is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15311, "Accessory Structures ", Class 11 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or placement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, including but not limited to on- premise signs. -3- Application No. 07- 1261PSP07- -0002; 12033 Miller Avenue119550 Prospect Road PROJECT DATA PROPOSAL CODE REQUIREMENTS/MAX SIZE OF LETTERING: Not to exceed 9.5 inches 18 inches AREA OF SIGN: Approx. 22 SF 24 SF HEIGHT OF SIGN: Approx. 5 feet 10 feet* (Sign: Approx 3 feet Base: Approx. 2 feet ) WIDTH OF SIGN: Approx. 8.2 feet NA (Sign: Approx 7.6 feet Base: Approx. 8.2 feet) *Sign height: Outside of the triangle of visibility at the corner, the height maximum for a freestanding sign is 10 feet. PROJECT DISCUSSION: Background On November 10, 2004, the Planning Commission heard a request from the applicant for approval of a Sign Permit to construct a seven -foot high, six -foot wide, freestanding identification sign along Prospect Road. The proposed sign was to be internally illuminated, with black letters on* a white background, and was to replace the existing wooden sign at the southwest corner of Miller Avenue and Prospect Road (Attachment 2). Internally illuminated signs are not permitted in the R -1- 10,000 zoning district and there was neighbor concern that the sign would be commercial in appearance and out of character with the neighborhood. Neighboring residents suggested that the sign be placed near the Prospect road entrance to the church rather than on the corner. The Commission recognized -the need for illumination of the sign, due to the intensity of traffic on Prospect Road, but recommended that the identification sign be constructed of wood and externally lit, in conformance with the other religious facilities in the City. The application was denied. In October 2006, the applicant submitted a new application for a six -foot high identification sign. The sign was to be constructed of wood and located near the Prospect Road driveway, with illumination provided by the adjacent parking lot light. Staff determined that the sign height could obstruct visibility at the driveway entrance and required a maximum height of three feet at that location. Illumination from the parking lot light would be ineffective at the reduced. height and the proposed location was moved to the current site further to the west, along Prospect Road. In the following months, the applicant made numerous modifications to the proposed design at the request o_ f Staff and the neighbors: F�_-1 L___A Application No. 07- 1261PSP07 -0002; 12033 Miller Avenue119550 Prospect Road • Freestanding posts were replaced by a solid stone block base to match the materials used in the adjacent church building. • Although 200 watts of illumination is allowed, the level of illumination was reduced to 64 watts. • The amount of text on the sign was reduced. • The colors were changed to match the adjacent buildings. • The lettering was changed from plastic letters to sculpted HDU foam, as was used on the Preston Wynne sign in the village. • The wood sign background was changed to HDU foam for greater durability and long -term aesthetics, based on the recommendations of sign professionals. Materials and Illumination The proposed sign will be constructed of high density architectural foam (HDU). This material has been used on numerous signs in this area, including the Preston Wynne sign in the Village, which was created by the same sign designer approximately twelve years ago. It has also been used for trim on several residential projects. The applicant chose this material over wood, based on the recommendations of several sign shops, due to its reputation for durability. The text, which will be on a raised relief, will be brown against a light beige background to match the colors used on the adjacent church building. The stone blocks used in the base will be similar in color and texture to those used in the church and hall. The existing landscaping will be maintained around the proposed sign and will provide additional shielding for the low- wattage fluorescent lights, which will be directed toward the sign. The lights for the sign will be on the same circuit and schedule as the existing parking lot lights. To accommodate future schedule changes, a removable PVC plaque, in colors to match the sign, will be used to announce the times for the services. Variations from Standards A freestanding identification sign, not exceeding twenty -four square feet in area, is allowed on the site of religious institutions in the residential districts. The existing sign is approximately 51 square feet and is located at the corner of Miller Avenue and Prospect Road. This sign is cracked and weathered and in need of replacement. The proposed sign will be approximately 22 square feet and will be located along Prospect Road in the landscaped area between the sidewalk and the parking lot. The City Code does not allow signs in a setback, which is 25 feet along the Prospect Road frontage of this site. The purpose of the signage is to identify the facility, particularly to those who are driving past on Prospect. Conforming to the 25 -foot setback would result in placing the sign in the parking lot. Because of the speed of vehicles traveling along Prospect Road, the placement of the sign must be such that the sign may be effectively read from the road. -5- Application No. 07- 1261PSP07- -0002; 12033 Miller Avenue119550 Prospect Road Religious institutions in residential districts are subject to conditional use permits. To achieve the purpose of identification signage, Staff recommends allowing the placement of the sign within the setback as a Variation from Standards under the Conditional Use permit. Neighbor Review Letters All neighbors within 500 feet of the parcel were mailed notices about the project (Attachment 4). The applicant has also submitted eighteen neighbor notification letters, none of which expressed concerns about the project. One neighbor had concerns, but those have been addressed and the neighbor has accepted the compromise (Attachment 5). Staff has received no negative responses to the project SIGN CRITERIA The proposed project is consistent with Article 15 -30 of the City Code. (a) The sign does comply with the regulations of Article 15 -30 and the residential district.. The project meets the criteria in that religious institutions in residential districts are allowed to have freestanding identification signs. Approval of the Variation from Standards will allow the location within the setback so that the sign may adequately identify the site to passersby along Prospect Road. (b) The size, shape, color, illumination, placement and material of the sign are compatible with the visual characteristics of the neighborhood and other lawful signs in the area. The project meets the criteria in that the proposed sign will be significantly smaller than the existing signage and the lighting will be shielded by vegetation. The earth tone colors and materials will match those used on the existing building and compliment the rustic appearance of the neighborhood.. (c) The location and design of the sign does not obscure from view or unduly detract from existing adjacent signs. The project meets the criteria in that the sign will be set back from the road and sidewalk, thereby not obscuring the view of pedestrians or drivers. The sign on the adjacent parcel is for Congregation Beth David, is similar in height, color, and purpose. (d) The location and design of a sign in close proximity to any residential district would not adversely affect the quality, or character of such residential area. The project meets the criteria in that the. materials and color, which will match the existing buildings, will not detract from the appearance of the site. The lights will be aimed directly at the sign and the potential glare will be shielded by the lighting ,fixture and the surrounding vegetation. USE PERNUT FINDINGS The proposed project is consistent with Article 15- 55.070 of the City Code. Application No. 07- 1261PSP07- -0002; 12033 Miller Avenue119550 Prospect Road (a) The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance. The project meets the criteria in that Approval of the Variation from Standards will allow the location within the setback so that the sign may adequately identify the site to passersby along Prospect Road, thereby fulfilling the objective of Article 15- 30.080(a). (b) The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project meets the criteria in that the proposed sign will be situated approximately ten feet back from Prospect Road and approximately 70 feet from the nearest driveway, thereby minimizing any impact on visibility. The lighting will be shielded by vegetation to reduce glare. The sign will be constructed in accordance with all Building Department regulations to ensure safety. By identifying the Church to passersby on Prospect Road before they reach the driveway, drivers will be able to access the parking lot without entering the residential area by way of Miller Avenue. (c) The proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of Chapter 15 -55. The project meets the criteria in that the purpose of Chapter 15- 55 is to provide the flexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance. The purpose of identification signs, which are allowed to be freestanding for religious institutions in residential districts, is to identify the site or the building. Allowing the proposed sign to be illuminated and located in the setback accomplishes this purpose. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that all the Sign Approval guidelines and criteria and Use Permit Findings for Variations from Standards can be made in the affirmative. The installation of the proposed sign and corresponding removal of the larger, damaged sign will enhance the appearance of the site. The new sign will be compatible with the adjacent buildings and signage and will be significantly smaller than the existing one. The lighting will be more adequately shielded and drivers on Prospect and residents in the adjacent neighborhood will all benefit from signage that directs churchgoers to the parking lot by way of Prospect Road rather than Miller Avenue. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed new sign, including the Variation to Standards. -7- Application No. 07- 1261PSP07- -0002; 12033 Miller Avenue119550 Prospect Road ATTACIIMENTS: 1. Resolution of Approval with conditions 2. _ Photo of existing sign 3. Photo of Congregation Beth David 4. Affidavit of Mailing Notices, Public Hearing Notice, Mailing labels for project notification 5. Neighbor correspondence 6. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A" • Attachment 1 • APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. Application No. 07- 126/PSP07 -0002 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Church of the Ascension/Diocese of San Jose; 12033 Miller Avenue /19550 Prospect Road . -WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for sign permit approval with Variations to Standards to construct an illuminated free - standing identification sign at 12033 Miller Avenue /19550 Prospect Road; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, the proposed new sign is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act {CEQA) pursuant to Section 15311, "Accessory Structures ", Class 11 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction, or placement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, including but not limited to on- premise signs; and WHEREAS, the, applicant has met the burden of proof required to support the findings for granting said sign permit approval and the following findings specified in City Code Section 15- 30.070:. (a)'The sign does comply with the regulations of Article 15 -30 and the residential district. The project meets the criteria. in that religious institutions in residential districts are allowed to have freestanding identification signs. Approval of the Variation from Standards will allow the location. within the setback so. that the sign may adequately identify the site to passersby along Prospect Road. (b) The size, shape, color, illumination, placement and material of the sign are compatible with the visual characteristics of the neighborhood and other lawful signs in the area. The project meets the criteria in that the proposed sign will be significantly smaller than the existing signage and the lighting will be shielded by vegetation. The earth tone colors and materials will match those used on the existing building and compliment the rustic appearance of the - neighborhood. (c) The location and design of the sign does not obscure from view or unduly detract from existing adjacent signs. The project meets the criteria in that the sign will be set back from the road and sidewalk, thereby not obscuring the view of pedestrians or drivers. The sign on the adjacent parcel is for Congregation Beth David, is similar in height, color, and purpose. (d) The location and design of a sign inclose proximity to any residential district would not adversely affect the quality or character of such residential area. The project meets the -1- criteria in that the materials and color, which will match the existing buildings, will not detract from the appearance of the site. The lights will be aimed directly at the sign and the potential glare will be shielded by the lighting fixture and the surrounding vegetation; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support the findings for a granting the Variations from Standards and the following findings specified in City Code Section 15- 15- 55.070 of the City Code: (a) The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance. The project meets the criteria in that Approval of the Variation from Standards will allow the location within the setback so that the sign may adequately identify the site to passersby along Prospect Road, thereby fulfilling the objective of Article 15- 30.080(a). (b) The proposed location of the conditional use and tl :e conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project meets the criteria in that the proposed sign will be situated approximately ten feet back from Prospect Road and approximately 70 feet from the nearest driveway, thereby minimizing any impact on visibility. The lighting will be shielded by vegetation to reduce glare. The sign will be constructed in accordance with all Building Department regulations to ensure safety. By identifying the Church to passersby on Prospect Road before they reach the driveway, drivers will be able to access the parking lot without entering the residential area by way of Miller Avenue. (c) The proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of Chapter 15 -55. The project meets the criteria in that the purpose of Chapter 15 -55 is to provide the flexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance. The purpose of identification signs, which are allowed to be freestanding for religious institutions in residential districts, is to identify the site or the building. Allowing the proposed sign to be illuminated and located in the setback accomplishes this purpose. . Now, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the application, site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the application for Sign Approval with Variations from Standards has been approved and is hereby granted subject to the conditions set forth below. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. The sign shall be located and constructed as shown on Exhibit "A," incorporated by reference, with the exception of the following conditions. 2. The existing identification sign and the corresponding lighting, located at the corner of Prospect Road and Miller Avenue, shall be permanently removed prior to final inspection. -2- 3. The height of the freestanding sign shall not exceed 5 feet, .including the base, and the S total sign area shall not exceed 24 square feet. .4. The height of letters shall not exceed 18 inches. 5. The sign shall be illuminated by low- wattage screened lights, which will be on the same circuit as the parking lot lights. The total wattage for the sign lighting will not exceed 64 watts. The hours of illumination will not exceed those currently in effect by the existing parking lot lights. 6. . The applicant will replace or restore any damaged landscape surrounding the proposed sign prior to final inspection. 7. The City reserves continuing jurisdiction over this sign permit and may revoke the permit upon any failure by. the permittee to comply with any condition set forth in this Resolution. CITY ATTORNEY 8. Applicant agrees to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's - action with respect to the applicant's project. Section 2. A Building Permit-must be issued and construction commenced within 36 months from the date of adoption of this Resolution or approval will expire. Section 3. - All applicable. requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section.4. Unless appealed pursuarit to the requirements of Article 15 -90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. • -3- PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, and this 10`" day of October 2007 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Joyce Hlava, Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: John F. Livingstone, AICP, Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, the Property Manager, and the Property Owner or Authorized Agent. Each of the undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Date Authorized Agent of Church of the Ascension -4- ttachment 2 • • a zs a yfssrx 4 ei rtt� }1r�� r yr -- �ti�.� 1� 5¢°'`g �i , �. �GyS,�� � ,�'+ a` F T'Y �^ s .., ja �t� ✓. s �,b. "'ty� 4 i F... ��. ���. -� � ::� � � a�' �' � r � ` �. w .� 3 �> n r '� � e� � a:�,� I' ,��lti f � 7i ' y,::• �i � q�7� �,� ' V r �{" . � '!' � u k� �, �.t� � �r x .a''�+�,r .tie• rvF �Y � a 'e � -�'a' t ` �.W -�nn� z'� "� 'e7 a � � '� Y r1 F e e.. AM. , u l ass �, .n, -" ,. •• � .<. .. -, -' ''' "i ,. .. ti v a 5 1A r .r p 4 a cp .. 0 7f Lo r a(f , i � Y e ' • ;.. O � ' t • '�. � 2 - �; 1 bl.� •e�1q .rya` *1 s _. y1 - $y 1 -• ae� i .. a , "�,p 1 �' , .' 1 Wit, R 5 ,:�",�I +w� �t '4 4r a Attachment 3 9 U • a y� qx f ^' 'k .);Y+ar. W.;::4 a{�., .rq"„' �. '$'�.•, „: 5� a'. ,.. �, r. :� { e. ,,( a .,;fig - ..q W. k- &r `.w•,�` - xc ...c < "r` a �,:*'s �e ,.d.•'.•' f r. 3..a +. A+k`.u''>u, •�. `�5 "' x ` G,, ?s'!-,. 5 .K•'"' „•.w .F. ar, s =..k, «. .`' : .'"t5,•, c. a ., r'� # Y w '� r Fr �' +a y p5 T7- , r, f'ri•: ,•a`4.au r1 ,p: .. . ". `"f ,b - ;r K :..-✓ .fi r., q_ " IF r �P. rS ";3r. � ,�.: .�•S . ,� V.C'.Yw )"mA :. .. t.w. : ?, .' a ''. .,. x, '•: t'., � .:� :'� ” ` F ,C. fir:.. 1t t4 % ..il d - %'.°74 ^. •,a..., .. a -,u _ 1 J„ . \..: .k7 ,.'ay `kK ,$• d.1:.:... . _,. ., : .: a - ..� r., . -4, :..,, t." � ,,.,, ,.. . -',3 .. ...... �, , ,. ,,. .. :_ m . .ru,.: rr 1,., .4 "'x.: •eS,M�*.e.:;,i• ,,y,�. f ..�BR}.,45:, �. 9 •r,,,,.. ..., i ,Y.. < x. ..._ � -J ..... .. , ,,.. '? �..: - ... . -, -,_s .. _... .... -( r . �S.-L .x�y .,. �.�^,W. ^.s.w..,.,. r .,a""r' „....�, >+ fi.,. .... .: � � fi.. -. ,.e >.,' _,.. :` .r �^. � m.k'a,. •. S. a, ry.. ..e< i,�':.n. 'r k , �• ,`r.,: >.,” ._.....,x `� a, .. ,..,. ,, . � .,,... - .:. •, ... W.. � � ^ "ai;,- y, vie• ; ,�tY »• �.7, •r. r.- sr ,.:.c, a:r A , ,t; , a..N ,.. .,. r _. + ^'rn. ;::;a r '`- .r.�;t f :: =s :-. . ,wn,' *�•.?rc ��, t ,. .,: ,.:. r, >t .: r� t ._: ,_..., . ,. .:..:.. .., ...' f °s, :..a:. .! r r _ ,Y .a (. :m '� z x .r4 kC , r_ :`'siJ't" y.. .,. r ; k°,q' x • "Kk;,.„. - '' _f k „t= h r m ",,; , t�,, ,yet ,�, ,r"�� .� 3, „« „ «,��,w .,!� . �.., ,�" ��;��". F.,: , "�..e ,��.c� •�,•» :,.�. ... a, a.. -�...: t dT _ .... :. ,.h U' � ?b y ., n w, +wr• ...:. 9 � q S KF...," ✓r� 4 ,�N.. Y.: .. , � h.ar ;. ,; .� a. s.: ,i.x, .,.., <. L, � .,•,".�,� ,?�!�1�;1:.' s �... .'�' , ,.?ef• .,•e ti 4; , �c' �- ..,,�r 'S.�.r",.. .. .� ,. :..,. A �:m;a, rr °mot ,.y a..,:.., .L', :r:-•. ,wr ,a. , ,,: o ' ar w.. - NB...:,..,=4 1n ..,,;:, .1 ,:: -•:' +.. " _ ,.t." 5:^�` -3,. • 4 `.,:r„ t, a 'r -. x o 1 . ,:. c. �": ... -.n, Z.P, 'n, „ +. t..:. .. ✓, w m«.n :,a f 'Y r M, .. .... .�.., _. .�.,$ 'rf^.Cr .2":,.a,. .w;. ..,mta "9"�aak.' � 1M-^a G �i�",,t, .._.`a - •: s^a M ... ..i.K��} e ;^ t v ,^ :: W a w+a^ �"%r' ti 1p�y^•�4`k4+, "W. {' ti'• Va.r. �, r V`t' `Ra ,.us;v , r� �K - .,fi"�"�^ c ��S �A. � �'� , r4Y'S� d J t'' Yr"°t '� ..• �� "'}��� r r 1 ;� �' ,H sr �, ..�`ai r. .. "� ' i.i.yr .;'C+5 •�wr. % - b mP�P xr•. � ``�' Mw..�r. "^wv �,} � "�r.1i +� x y ,y�' ,' �'° ' f�'�YK>�s ,p� � '•t3e.L , -0`� {` , F' * •� '"y �':�,a W'• "' y ,mow �w "i t, .�'Y. r ,`.�' � -r yeas ra b , t 1M w s , z • � "C 4, , $ `'� f i9 4 �:4 -'y' k �,+�...�`�cF'� .f i�A i� e , "w .. , "i •C.'Ptl +a.",`,Y'ri '< " ..r` , ,. °:k�:i�>3m;1` '�4d., 5 ':i.+aA : r, `d'° ` �A A.. xL * �' `w•• { �n� � ` .•Y� i.�,!�;t t e sw`,s ""''. .. n�"."''+ f1` :�. ,,, f!'�. =�. � '� �g�}�F' �"" "t�.n, �" tl� •:k+ f4�' �'�'� :q, ✓' ;, � � �a �,� " , .,yo- ;v,. �t Yr��',r.., uw., ... sbi. ??' k "PF.,;•' -$ +R.riL.:m"'' :`'e"�a �M x .tr - +a.+".o- yR +` " „k:.'. d 4 "xi.."t ., ?, r r 4. <'�r°y# k .. ':°� +r 16 •. r a rc .+, ' x � e':?R e . a t �� r a X .x'” i� 'C.':: r.. s' "yY 3 ,r srti,«r� �:;P � "�' fi. 3��Rt _ „��p1♦ �..; t.r�"w��S .�. "x.74. N,,�",, ;'�"' , „5 .�r. S � ,.et .., tt= '<^yrr �'.. w. 1..���:: ',"',. V2S.... •� � >i ?: f :e ,..: •r - +r b {yd .' ar' - . ' a - ,. y'. p'Kr � ' •' Ac '•3 � .. "�4'x�. �: .. ,. ivy{ Fr x:w �. ,�L -Y ��`, , "'�5,s” -� �:v y. .( >Y.. 4 $•. F w °� .. �! r a.,q.. S .� •,: ;-, �;. �� cwt cam.: 44% a: 0 *A 'dcA_ r �^ a' '�d ++��y 9'�+:., q'Lt'7 n �'�t� � . .°I. a• 3. _;;�. , ' %'w%.:, �, W x�". "''. +Fy3ti •,,..,: ° - r " .a e'�`, \,E7:•, ,�.�i. ., .r'�,... ;.,, •'a'�.: •� ' '.w� ,,.::_�,`an A Y w di.'$'7�y, *'�a ,. wh,• -,�!r. _� -!Q3T� � .a, _ � a � . .3 r'tlM � q, ;� i. '� i A r .'':��,,». �'��' �.� ���, � '.'ss}. .+•� � .$ "•`u ".'3' <a?.+� -+� r .P,S� `5' �,"' ;>•� y,,. :9 �•� y. M 5 '�- < tb P. '3i:^ .� , � "' ,. '�dw.%X. � ', '"6YP' f :•R• � 'v" rok _. E3�E' n . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, Denise Kaspar , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the 19th day of September , 2007, that I deposited 209 notices in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to -wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15- 45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property described as: APN: 386 -35 -069 Address: 19550 Propsect Ave 12033 Miller Avenue that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. t C driz Denise Kaspar Advanced Listing Services City of Saratoga Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 408- 868 -1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Saratoga's Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on: Wednesday, the 10th day of October 2007, at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall theater located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. The public hearing agenda item is stated below. Details of this item are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. Please consult the City website at www.saratoga.ca.us regarding Friday office closures. APPLICATION /ADDRESS: #07- 126/PSP07 -0002 —12033 Miller Avenue /19550 Prospect Road APPLICANT: Church of the Ascension (Diocese of San Jose) APN: 386 -35 -069 DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests design review for an illuminated freestanding sign in the R -1 -10 district. The . high density urethane architectural foam sign will be mounted on a stone block base and painted beige with brown lettering, which will match the colors on the adjacent church buildings. The combined sign and base will be approximately' five feet high and eight feet wide. The text will spell out "Church of the Ascension Roman Catholic" and will include the times of the masses. A11 interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a decision of the Piannirlg Commission pursuant to a Public Hearing in court, you maybe limited to raising only those -issues you or s6 06ne else 'raised at the Public Hearing. In order for information to be included in the Planning Commissioi 's inform ion packets; written communications should be filed on or before Friday, April 13, 2007. A site visit will be held on the day preceding the hearing date listed above as part of the standard Site Visit Committee agenda. bite visits occur between 3:30 and 5:00 p.m. The site visit is open to the public. The Site Visit Committee will convene at the City Hall parking lot at 3:30 p:m. on the day preceding the hearing and visit the site listed above. They may visit'other sites as well. For more information, please contact the Community Development Department at 408 868 -1222 or review the Site Visit Agenda on the City website at www.saratogra.ca.us. This notice has-been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The City'uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor's office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out -of -date information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all tesidents potentially- affected by a project. If you believe that your neighbors would beds' terested in the project' described in this notice,. we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will`ensure that everyone'inyour Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Suzanne Thomas Assistant Plan er 40$=8,68- 1212. sthomas @saratoga. ca: us ieptember 19, 2007 ;Oonership Listing 'repared for: ;86 -35 -069 WMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN JOS .2033 MILLER AVENUE/ .9550 PROSPECT ROAD ;ARATOGA CA 95070 -3322 373 -09 -002 373 -09 -003 :73 -09 -001 YI -NAN LIN RITA J & CAROLYN AHERN ,"STELLA C & KWAN CHAN OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 'O BOX 303 1684 DANROMAS WAY 1672 DANROMAS WAY : UPERTINO CA 95015 -0303 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3906 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3906 ,73 -09 -004 373 -09 -005 373 -09 -006 )ANIEL J & BEVERLY PRESSMAN ANA M & LEONARDO ALVAREZ YOSHIO & IKUKO HONDA )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 660 DANROMAS WAY 1648 DANROMAS WAY 1636 DANROMAS WAY ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -3906 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3906 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3906 i73 -09 -007 373 -09 -008 373 -09 -027 -ZONG TZNG ROBERT D & DIANE MORRIS ABEL L CHOW )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 1821 E GUM AVE 624 DANROMAS WAY 1612 DANROMAS WAY WOODLAND CA 95776 -5151 SE CA 95129 -3906 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3906 �73 -09 -028 373 -09 -029 373 -09 -030 �RNOLD JOHNSON CHESTER F & ANNA MOUTON WAYNE W & LINDA GRODT )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER .623 MILLER AVE 1635 MILLER AVE 1647 MILLER AVE ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -3942 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3942 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3942 :73 -09 -031 373 -09 -032 373 -09 -033 ASPAL S & BLINDER GILL DAVID & COLLEEN MAY SHUI C & HSIU CHEN )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 1529 CONSTANSO WAY 659 MILLER AVE 1671 MILLER AVE SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4949 ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -3942 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3942 ;73 -09 -034 373 -10 -001 373 -10 -002 >URENDRANATH & VANISREE HONG MA MARK & DIANA BRADY 3ATTAR OR CURRENT OWNER 20900 STEVENS CREEK BLVD )R CURRENT OWNER 6343 PROSPECT RD CUPERTINO CA 95014 -2170 695 MILLER AVE SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3943 ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -3942 173 -10 -003 373 -10 -004 373 -10 -005 WALTER C & JENNIFER LEE SUNEEL D & PRATIMA JOSHI ROBERT R & NWE ALLEN )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 0359 PROSPECT RD 6367 PROSPECT RD 6379 PROSPECT RD ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -3943 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3943 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3943 1006 373 -10 -007 373 -10 -008 EDWARD M & PATRICIA SMITH ROSEMARY BRADLEY TANG ?RIC S T ANG OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 'O BOX 700178 1662 LARKIN AVE 6378 IVY LN 'AN JOSE 95170 -0178 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3929 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3918 ;73 -10 -009 WILLIAM S & ELAINE AUMAN )R CURRENT OWNER 668 IVY LN ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -3918 ;73 -10 -012 �LLIN D & EILEEN KINGSBURY )R CURRENT OWNER 658 ELMAR WAY ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -3914 . 373 -10 -010 ETSUKO SHIOYA OR CURRENT OWNER 6360 IVY IN SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3918 373 -10 -013 SHIOYA KUNITAKA T 284 W SUNNYOAKS AVE CAMPBELL CA 95008 ;73 -10 -015 373 -10 -016 RED A & ALYCE GUSTAFSON PING W CHANG )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 622 ELMAR WAY 1610 ELMAR WAY ;AN JOSE. CA" 95129 -3914: SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3914 ;73 -10 -036 373 -10 -037 'RIC I & KYUNGWON SONG WU H & WEN PENG )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 625 ELMAR WAY 1637 ELMAR WAY ;AN JOSE CA 95129 - 3915 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3915 ;73 -10 -039 373 -10 -040 ,WOK WONG HUNGHSIN & HUI -CHANG KUO )R.CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER .636 LARKIN AVE 1620 LARKIN AVE ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -3927 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3927 :73 -10 -060 373 -10 -061 ;TEWART SHUM VLADIMIR A & ELENA KALININ )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER .609 DANROMAS WAY 1621 DANROMAS WAY ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -3907 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3907 ;73 -10 -063' 373 -10 -064 0 CONLY ANTHONY & ANN CAMARDA )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 645 DANROMAS WAY 1657 DANROMAS WAY ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -3907 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3907 ;73 -10 -066 kLAN J & JUNKO DUBOFF )R CURRENT OWNER 681 DANROMAS WAY ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -3907 " ;73 -12 -025 VANQUN & HANYING BAO )R CURRENT OWNER )434 BIBEL AVE ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -3801 373 -10 -067 PHILIP ODONNELL OR CURRENT OWNER 1693 DANROMAS WAY SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3907 373 -12 -026 TERRY M & SYLVIA MITCHELL OR CURRENT OWNER 6418 BIBEL AVE SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3801 373 -10 -011 LAKSTIGALA OR CURRENT OWNER 6352 IVY IN. SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3918 373 -10 -014 ALFRED G & ANN LOSCO OR CURRENT OWNER 1634 ELMAR WAY SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3914 373 -10 -035 WAYNE F SELTZER OR CURRENT OWNER 1613 ELMAR WAY SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3915 373 -10 -038 JONSKY HSU OR CURRENT OWNER 6385 IVY LN SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3919 373 -10 -041 TIEN -LAI HWANG 12869 ROBLEDA RD LOS ALTOS CA 94022 -3485 373 -10 -062 ARTHUR L & SUE WONG OR CURRENT OWNER 1633 DANROMAS WAY SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3907 373 -10 -065 REN MIN & LI J OR CURRENT OWNER 1669 DANROMAS WAY SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3907 373 -12 -024 VICKI & DOUGLAS BEUMELER OR CURRENT OWNER 6450 BIBEL AVE SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3801 373 -12 -027 KWANG H & HYANG NAM OR CURRENT OWNER 6402 BIBEL AVE SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3801 ;73 -12 -028 373 -12 -029 373 -12 -030 TOM R AINN -YUH HWANG CHEE Y CHAN )R CURRENT OWNER 10220 PENINSULA AVE OR CURRENT OWNER i1403 IVY LN CUPERTINO CA 95014 -1211 IVY LN ; SAN AN JOSE CA 95129 -3971 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3971 73 -12 -031 373 -12 -032 373 -12 -036 ;UNG KIM SON LUU GLENN G LAI )R URRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER Y LN 6491 IVY LN 6492 IVY LN ;A SE CA 95129 -3971 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3971 0 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3900 73 -12 -037 373 -12 -038 373 -12 -039 'IMOTHY R & ESTHER PAASKE MYRON I SABES DENNIS R WONG )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 21103 LAVINA CT 470 IVY LN 6448 IVY LN CUPERTINO CA 95014 -1631 ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -3900 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3900 .73 -12 -040 373 -12 -041 373 -12 -042 :OBERT W & MARIETA MARASCHIN KYLE C FAN JIANDE JIANG )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 665 LARKIN AVE 6405 PROSPECT RD 6427 PROSPECT RD ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -3928 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3840 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3840 .73 -12 -043 373 -12 -044 373 -12 -045 'UJARE- NAGAVARAPU JIANHUA HUANG RALPH W CHAMBERS )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 449 PROSPECT RD 6471 PROSPECT RD 6493 PROSPECT RD ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -3840 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3840 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3840 ;73 -12 -047 373 -12 -048 373 -12 -049 EFF C & BRANDON LO NORMA L BUFORD CHARLES & MARGARET TING )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 1515 PROSPECT RD 6537 PROSPECT RD 6545 PROSPECT RD ; )OSE CA 95129 -3841 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3841 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3841 373 -12 -053 373 -12 -054 ;73 -12 -050 PERAHIA FAMILY TRUST SAM LIANG ;TEPHEN & MALINDA CHAN OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER '050 RAINBOW DR 12 6548 IVY LN 6538 IVY LN ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -4524 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3837 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3837 373 -12 -056 377 -28 -001 ;73 -12 -055 JIANGXU XIANG JAMES M & MARY MARSHALL ✓lANSOP HAHN OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER !0488 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 1616 6525 IVY LN 6298 SQUIREDELL DR 'UPERTINO CA 95014 -6800 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -3838 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4748 ;77 -28 -002 377 -28 -003 377 -28 -017 ;O WILSON SING -HEI KI Y & YOUNG SUH XIAO C WU )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER )284 SQUIREDELL DR 6268 SQUIREDELL DR 6245 TRACEL DR ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -4748 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4748 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4762 ;77 -28 -018 377 -28 -019 377 -28 -020 TING T & NANCY CHAN JENN TAI NANCY KEANE )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER )257 TRACEL DR 6269 TRACEL DR 6281 TRACEL DR ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -4762 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4762 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4762 A 021 377 -28 -022 377 -28 -023 A & SHASHIKALA MAHAJAN CHRISTOPHER J & KATHRYN CHUNGTI A LIANG )R CURRENT OWNER MUSSETT OR CURRENT OWNER )293 TRACEL DR OR CURRENT OWNER 6280 TRACEL DR 'AN JOSE CA 95129 -4762 6292 TRACEL DR SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4761 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4761 ;77 -28 -024 377 -28 -025 ;HARLES R & DAVIDA ADELBERG RICHARD BROWNLIE )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER P'268 TRACEL DR 6256 TRACEL DR ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -4761 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4761 ,77 -28 -027 377 -28 -028 �RMES FAMILY TRUST SYLVIA H HSIEH )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 1232 TRACEL DR 6220 TRACEL DR ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -4761 SANIOSE CA 95129 -4761 �77 -28 -063 377- 287064 OHN D & LYSBETH SANFORD WUNSCH 2005 )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 223 PROSPECT RD . 6235 PROSPECT RD ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -4740 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4740 77 -28 -066 377 -28 -067 kNDY & JULIE KANG CHENG C & JEAN HU )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER -259 PROSPECT RD 6271 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4740 SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4740 77 -28 -069 386 -03 -017 ;ARVESH & SWARNA ADDA ADELE SALLE )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER ;295 PROSPECT RD 12188 TERRENCE AVE ;AN JOSE CA 95129 -4740. SARATOGA CA 95070 -3347 86 -03 -019 386 -03 -020 7OSHITARO & YOKO KUMAGAI ISMAIL & NAFIZE OKTER )R CURRENT OWNER - OR CURRENT OWNER _ 2168 TERRENCE AVE 12154 TERRENCE AVE ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -3347 SARATOGA CA 9507073347 377 -28 -026 ENG -SON & JANE CHANG OR CURRENT OWNER 6244 TRACEL DR SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4761 377 -28 -062 SHANKARALINGA BALASUBRAMANIAN OR CURRENT OWNER 6211 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4740 377 -28 -065 BOR- CHYANG & TAI -ING LIN 7910 FALL CT CUPERTINO CA 95014 -4114 377 -28 -068 CHENG H & TERESA MA OR CURRENT OWNER 6283 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4740 386 -03 -018 ERNEST S & MARCIA GORDON OR CURRENT OWNER 12176 TERRENCE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3347 386 -03 -021 FRANK SHIN OR CURRENT OWNER 12146 TERRENCE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3347 386 -03 -024 ROBERT J & ROSEMARY JOHNSON OR CURRENT OWNER 12111 TERRENCE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3346 386 -03 -027 YUNG -SHENG HOA OR CURRENT OWNER 12141 TERRENCE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3346 386 -03 -030 CHARLES L & LORRAINE RADER OR CURRENT OWNER 12171 TERRENCE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3346 386 -03 -049 GEORGE J & HUEY LEE OR CURRENT OWNER 12142 SCULLY AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3339 • • 386 =03 -023 86 -03 -022 GERALD W & KAY YOUNG IAO -WEN TSAI OR CURRENT OWNER 49 SAINT LUCIA CT - 12122 TERRENCE AVE �AN JOSE CA 95127-1037 -3347 SARATOGA CA 95070 -86 -03 =025 386 -03 -026 ,AWRENCE L & POLLY HSU KAREL TRUST - )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 2129 TERRENCE AVE. 12137 TERRENCE AVE , ARATOGA CA 95070 -3346 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3346 86 -03 -028. -. 386 -03 -029 :OBERT P & CECILIA ANDRIS RAMAMURTI & RANJANI )R CURRENT OWNER CHANDRAMOULI 2155 TERRENCE AVE OR CURRENT OWNER ARATOGA CA 95070 -3346 12167 TERRENCE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3346 86 =03 -047 386 -03 -048 YLENN P GARRAHAN SHIH -TAY WANG )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 2164 SCULLY AVE 12150 SCULLY AVE ARATOGA CA 95070 -3339 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3339 377 -28 -026 ENG -SON & JANE CHANG OR CURRENT OWNER 6244 TRACEL DR SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4761 377 -28 -062 SHANKARALINGA BALASUBRAMANIAN OR CURRENT OWNER 6211 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4740 377 -28 -065 BOR- CHYANG & TAI -ING LIN 7910 FALL CT CUPERTINO CA 95014 -4114 377 -28 -068 CHENG H & TERESA MA OR CURRENT OWNER 6283 PROSPECT RD SAN JOSE CA 95129 -4740 386 -03 -018 ERNEST S & MARCIA GORDON OR CURRENT OWNER 12176 TERRENCE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3347 386 -03 -021 FRANK SHIN OR CURRENT OWNER 12146 TERRENCE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3347 386 -03 -024 ROBERT J & ROSEMARY JOHNSON OR CURRENT OWNER 12111 TERRENCE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3346 386 -03 -027 YUNG -SHENG HOA OR CURRENT OWNER 12141 TERRENCE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3346 386 -03 -030 CHARLES L & LORRAINE RADER OR CURRENT OWNER 12171 TERRENCE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3346 386 -03 -049 GEORGE J & HUEY LEE OR CURRENT OWNER 12142 SCULLY AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3339 • • 86 -03 -050 7INCENZO & SANDRA SIGNORE )R CURRENT OWNER 2MCULLY AVE AA OGA CA 95070 -3339 .86 -27 -005 ALEX SANDRA )R CURRENT OWNER 9447 ERIC DR ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -3310 ,86 -27 -008 VEI -MING & ROGER CHU )R CURRENT OWNER .9499 ERIC DR ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -3310 386 -03 -051 JOHN B & ELIZABETH HUTZ OR CURRENT OWNER 12130 SCULLY AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3339 386 -27 -006 DENNIS F & ANGELA WHITE OR CURRENT OWNER 19465 ERIC DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3310 386 -27 -009 AUDREY HILDEBRAND OR CURRENT OWNER 19519 ERIC DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3310 ;86 -27 -011 386 -27 -012 >T PATRICKS MISSIONA RY SOCIETY RAYMOND J & DONNA MUZZY )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER .9536 ERIC DR 19518 ERIC DR > ARATOGA CA 95070 -3354 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3354 ;86 -27 -014 386 -27 -015 MARGARET M & DAVID BIRNBAUM DANIEL M GIAQUINTA )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER .2073 CANDY LN 12091 CANDY LN 3j#OGA CA 95070 -3366 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3366 )86 -27 -017 386 -27 -018 'HILIP M & JULIA LIN SOFIA FILSHTINSKY )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER .2123 CANDY LN 12141 CANDY LN 3ARATOGA CA 95070 -3307 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3307 386 -27 -021 586 -27 -020 JOHN D & JOLANDA OBRIEN 3RIRAM KRISHNASWAMI OR CURRENT OWNER 1632 NIGHTINGALE AVE 12197 CANDY LN 3UNNYVALE CA 94087 -4851 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3307 386 -27 -030 386 -27 -031 [OHN C & SANDRA TROWBRIDGE RICHARD CAMPBELL )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 12124 CANDY LN 12110 CANDY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -3308 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3308 386 -27 -033 386 -27 -034 3URPREET RIHAL BRIAN T & LOIS BROUILLETTE :)R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 12074 CANDY LN 12058 CANDY LN 3ARATOGA CA 95070 -3365 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3365 3 036 386 -27 -062 (E M BURGESS YIHBAN JANG JR CURRENT OWNER 18510 SERRA CT 12067 INGRID CT MORGAN HILL CA 95037 -2963 3ARATOGA CA 95070 -3312 386 -03 -052 ANIL & SUMAN GUPTA OR CURRENT OWNER 12110 SCULLY AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3339 386 -27 -007 YONG TENG OR CURRENT OWNER 19481 ERIC DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3310 386-27-010 JANET FONTENOT OR CURRENT OWNER 19537 ERIC DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3310 386 -27 -013 CHARLES & JILL BOSTIC OR CURRENT OWNER 12057 CANDY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -3366 386 -27 -016 ANDREW PENG OR CURRENT OWNER 12111 CANDY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -3307 386 -27 -019 TERRY T & SUSAN JOHNSON OR CURRENT OWNER 12153 CANDY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -3307 386 -27 -029 GAYLAN E & KATHLEEN KESSEL OR CURRENT OWNER 12140 CANDY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -3308 386 -27 -032 JAMES A & REGINA LEE OR CURRENT OWNER 12092 CANDY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -3365 386 -27 -035 MARTIN YANG OR CURRENT OWNER 12053 INGRID CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -3312 386 -27 -063 GALL FAMILY TRUST OR CURRENT OWNER 12198 MILLER AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3324 86 -27 -064 386 -27 -065 386 -27 -066 IAO -KUN CHUANG CSABA & GABRIELLA TRUCKAI STEVEN B & DONNA FRANKEL )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 2176 MILLER AVE 19566 ARDEN CT 19557 ARDEN CT ARATOGA CA 95070 -3324 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3301 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3301 86 -27 -067 ?DWARD Y & PING YANG )R CURRENT OWNER 9569 ARDEN CT ARATOGA CA 95070 -3301 86 -27 -070 VILLIAM C & NANCY DANIHER )R CURRENT OWNER 9572 ARDMORE CT ARATOGA CA 95070 -3302 86 -27 -073 ?RGUN & BAHAR GENC" )R CURRENT OWNER 9567 ARDMORE CT ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -3302- 86 -35 -046 )AVID R & WEN -HWA LIU )R CURRENT OWNER 9666 ASCENSION DR , ARATOGA CA 95070 -3356 86 -35 -049" ►NAND S & RIE TOLANI )R CURRENT, OWNER 9604 ASCENSION. DR , ARATOGA CA 95070 -3356 86 -35 -052 ;HEN CHANG )R CURRENT OWNER 9655 ASHTON CT , ARATOGA CA 95070 -3303 86 -35 -055. )AREN KUO )R CURRENT OWNER 9668 ASHTON CT ARATOGA CA 95070 -3303 86 -35 -058 MARY YOUNG )R CURRENT OWNER_ 9602 ASHTON CT ARATOGA CA 95070 -3303 86 -35 -061 ;ATHCART )R CURRENT OWNER 9645 LADERA CT ARATOGA CA 95070 -3329 386 -27 -068 SHAILAJA SATISH OR CURRENT OWNER 12148 MILLER AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3357 386 -27 -071 ROBERT E & WANDA FLORA OR CURRENT OWNER 19560 ARDMORE CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -3302 386 -27 -069 AUGUST SMITH OR CURRENT OWNER 12124 MILLER AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3357 386 -27 -072 JINSHU & KEIBUN SON OR CURRENT OWNER 19555 ARDMORE CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -3302 386 -27 -074 386 -35 -069 386 -35 -045 ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN DAVID W & TERRY BURLESON JOS OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 19686 ASCENSION DR 12072 MILLER AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -3356 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3322 386 -35 -047 ZHI C LI OR CURRENT OWNER 19642 ASCENSION DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3356 386 -35 -050 YEONG C SOONG OR CURRENT OWNER 19603 ASHTON CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -3303 386 -35 -053 GEORGE P MIRTH OR CURRENT OWNER 19671 ASHTON CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -3303 386 -35 -056 ELMER R & FRANCES KULM OR CURRENT OWNER 19644 ASHTON CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -3303 386 -35 -059 BILL MA OR CURRENT OWNER 19601 LADERA CT SARATOGA CA 05070 -3329 386 -35 -048 JEAN C CHANG OR CURRENT OWNER 19620 ASCENSION DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3356 386 -35 -051 HUI LIU OR CURRENT OWNER 19617 ASHTON CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -3303 386 -35 -054 FERNANDEZ FAMILY TRUST OR CURRENT OWNER 19684 ASHTON CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -3303 386 -35 -057 RONALD J & JAYNE DIBIASE OR CURRENT OWNER 19618 ASHTON CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -3303 386 -35 -060 DANIEL F & NANCY LI OR CURRENT OWNER 19619 LADERA CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -3329 386 -35 -062 386 -35 -063 STELLA & TIEN PING YING REAL EST ADRIAN & KATHERINE TANG OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 19661 LADERA CT 19656 LADERA CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -3329 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3329 • ,86 -35 -067 386 -35- 070,071 386 -37 -001 ;UNG -LIANG & CINDY CHOU CONGREGATION BETH DAVID YAO H CHANG )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 9JMADERA CT 19700 PROSPECT RD 19771 COLBY CT ;ARWOGA CA 95070 -3329 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3352 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3202 .86 -37 -002 386 -37 -003 386 -37 -004 AMES H & MARSHA PATTERSON SEONG C & SEONG KIM SAM & PAMELA KHOO )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 9783 COLBY CT 19795 COLBY CT 19807 COLBY CT ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -3202 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3202 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3202 .86 -37 -005 386 -37 -006 386 -37 -007 RUN & PRAVEEN NARAYAN DAVID & B WYANDT PIAZZA FAMILY TRUST )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 9819 COLBY CT 19827 COLBY CT 19828 COLBY CT ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -3202 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3202 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3202 ;86 -37 -008 386 -37 -009 386 -37 -010 kLTON & CARMEN ANDERSON LILY H & PASCAL CHEN NEIL A & JUDITH KEEVER )R CURRENT OWNER 2021 THE ALAMEDA 130 OR CURRENT OWNER 9816 COLBY CT SAN JOSE CA 95126 -1126 19798 COLBY CT > ARATOGA CA 95070 -3202 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3202 i86 -37 -011 386 -37 -012 386 -37 -013 ,INGXIONG SHAO LOUIS P & BERNICE DEGIVE GRIFFITH M & LOIS BROWN )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER .9786 COLBY CT 19774 COLBY CT 19773 VIEWRIDGE DR ;Ao OGA CA 95070 -3202 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3202 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3236 86- 7 -014 386 -37 -015 386 -37 -016 :LEIN K & IUE -FANG KAO DAVID & CHRISTINE EGGLESTON ROBERT A & BONNIE LIND )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER .9785 VIEWRIDGE DR 19797 VIEWRIDGE DR 19809 VIEWRIDGE DR ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -3236 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3236 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3236 ;86 -37 -017 386 -37 -018 386 -37 -019 :HUNG -HO & CHEN -HUII FAN THOMAS K & DIANNA SAARI HELEN LOTT )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 9815 VIEWRIDGE DR 19823 VIEWRIDGE DR 19824 VIEWRIDGE DR > ARATOGA CA 95070 -3236 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3236 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3205 X86 -37 -020 386 -37 -021 386 -37 -022 3RIAN SHING WARREN UCHIMOTO CHUNG LUAN )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER .9816 VIEWRIDGE DR 19808 VIEWRIDGE DR 19796 VIEWRIDGE DR ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -3205 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3205 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3205 ;86 -37 -023 386 -37 -024 386 -37 -025 J MONTGOMERY -RAYL KUANG -YU WANG WEN LIOU )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER .9784 VIEWRIDGE DR 19772 VIEWRIDGE DR 19775 OAKHAVEN DR ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -3205 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3205 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3213 A 026 386 -37 -027 386 -37 -028 D J & MARLENE KASS DEAN D & LUCILLE ANTONELLI GUY M & NANCY ROBBY )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 9787 OAKHAVEN DR 19799 OAKHAVEN DR 19805 OAKHAVEN DR ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -3213 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3213 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3213 86 -37 -035 386 -37 -036 386 -37 -037 ;UNIL & AARTI MEHTA HWA S & SUNWOO KIMN HONG -SHEH & SHEAU YU )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 9784 OAKHAVEN DR 19776 OAKHAVEN DR 12153 SCULLY AVE ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -3214 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3214 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3338 :ITY OF SARATOGA Advanced Listing Services =M Suzanne Thomas P.O._ Box 2593 3777 FRUITVALE AVENUE Dana Point CA 92624 ;ARATOGA CA 95070 • • • • General Notices ORDER TO SHOW dIUSE FOR GUNGE OF MAME CASE N0. 107CY09 . SUPERIOR COURT OF CALI- FORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLAM 191 NORTH FIRST STREET, SAN JOSE, CA 95113 IN TH E MATTER OFTHE PETI- TION OF SHU YANG THE COURT FINDS that Petitioner(s) SHU YANG has /have filed Pore deuce changing name(s) as fol- lows: Present NIAm SHU YANG Proposed come: LegalAdvertising�jhbiicNotices AMY SHU YANG THE COURT ORDERS that all persons Nlerested In this matter shag appear before this court at the hearing "`U- caled below to show muse, if any, why the Petition rat change of name should not be granted. Notice of Hearing on OCTO- BFA 30.2007 at 8:45 a.m. In ROOM 107 located at 191 North First Street, San lose, CA 95113. A COPY ofthis orderto show cause shall be published at least once each week for f.ur s ccesswe weeks prior to the date set for hearing on the petition in the following newspaper of general orw- lalion, SARATOGA NEWS, printed in the County of Santa Clara. Important Information: No dmrda aft. mbmbrtan Caedd ah ail m-he adn fx famreadvetid[g, rc, a died Ads m- bediacded bdxedmd- Li efm da is- Advati —mr, arc amq,td epos tM r,preeuudon dx tk adwrda aiiNm ice apwy bavet6e dg6[ m pab8d decmmu diem(. In mmi4 -6on d and pahfiagm adwxiu and m agewf.F. romlmrdfyand bald the pnbus6e 6armlm ag,m,t anympme alea, by— ofa,ydba,mi.mgootdp.blin- ioe 7Le pvbii,he e,ewa de right to edit. a- .ia m,due my dmung mbmirmi F pa8de cmmmmg,padkugmie.Pkaeldamd<paa- graph x de �g d[hecaugarq a all co x 109300.1031 ,mad m x dm,ifiedsQeommau[y- n+„�pcuam. 1�1 Dated: SEPTEMBER 4, 2007 estate of the decedent. /Mary Ann Gdlu! THE PETITION requests the judge ofthe Supeder Court decedent's WILL and will. (Pub SN 9112, 9119, 9/26, dls, if any, be admitted to 1013) obate. The will and any MO7I�OF PEOTWN TO codidls are available for ADMIN A ESTATE OF by the court. m the file kept BARBARA JAKE HANSEN by the wort. THE PETITION requests CASE NO. 1-07-Pit-163900 authority to administer To all heirs, beneficiades, the estate under the creditors, contingent credi- Independent Administration tors, and Persons who may of Estates Act. (This awhur- otherwise be interested in ity will albw the personal me will or estate, or both of representative to take many BARBARA JANE HANSEN actions without obtaining A PETITION has been filed by court approval. Before tak- GERALD B. HANSEN in the Ing certain very impodent Superior Court of California, actions, however, the per. County of Santa Cara. sonat representative will THE PETITION requests that be required to give notice to GERALD B. HANSEN be interested persons unless appointed as personat mpre. they have waived notice or tentative to administer the consented to the proposed action.) The independent Valley eommmity administration aumority Will Silicon N,wspapem— p6mlia- be granted unless an intery Wary for rs Igloo,, kr my ested person files an obiec- eme, m insert an adoer &r lion to the petition and meld. Uahiuty rx any moo, shows good cause why the .mppearkgman adwnuemmu cod should nor grant the ' Dmred ie de Lost of the authority. span atuaay xwpied W A HEARING on the petition auowaxe, However, "I W, will be held on OCTOBER 1& Varied hr m emr thu dm 2007, 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 15 cot mawiaay dNU d, wWe located at 191 North First St., oime,evwasmiex ro wag- San lase, CA 95113. rymrmaeiadmem. my cox IF YOU OBJECT to the grami- ng of the petition, you mug be mponed within IS should appear at the hearing ear• of pubtkgim cot,. d date your objections or UedN br xmrs h anted m file written objections with nra imerdon. the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or e contingent creditor of the deceased, you must file your daim with the wort and mail a copy to the personal mpre- senlatfve apponted by the court with iin four months from the date of first issuance of lett... s provid- ed in section 9100 of the California Probate Code. The time for filing claims will not w1Nre before four months ham the headng date noticed above. YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person mtem tad in the estate, you may file with the court a formal Requesi for Special Notice of the filing if an inventory and appraisal of estate assets o of any petition or account as provided in section 1250 Of the California Probate Code. A Request Fir SPeda( Notice form is avajlaWe from the court derl, Attorney for petifioner. RUSSELL V. ROESSLER, ESQ. 111 W. ST. ON N ST. 0706 SAI4 JOS E, CA 95113 408. 295 -1385 (Pub SN 9/26,10/3,10/10) NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF EDITH SHANTA OAS LOONIER, aka E. SHANTA DAS, SHANTA D. LOOMED, and SHANTA CAS LOOMER EASE NO. 1-07 -PR- 161872 To all heirs, benefidaries, creditors, contingent -di. tors, and persons who may otherwise he interested in the will or estate, or both of EDITH SHANTA OAS LOOMER, aka E. SHANTA DAS, SHANTA D. LOOMER and SHANTA DAS LOOMER A PETITION has been filed by SHANTELLE LOOMER 9 DAVID LOOMED- in the Superior Court of California. County of Santa Clara. THE PETITION requests that SHANTELLE LOOMER 9 DAVID LOOMER be appoint- ed as personal representa- tive to administer the estate of the decedem. THE PETITION requests the decedent's WILL and wdj- dh, if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court. THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Ad. (This author- ity will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before taking certain very important actions, however, the personal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived nofice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an interested person files an objection to the Per- ton. and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority. A HEARING on the petition will be held on OCTOBER 11, 2007, 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 15 located at 191 North First St., San lose, CA 95113. IF YOU OBJECT to the granting of the petition, you sho hearing nand state atyour objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in per- son or by Your attorney. IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the deceased, you must file your claim with the court and mall a copy to the se personal reprentative appointed by the court within Pour months from the date of first issuance of letters as provided in section 9100 of the California Probate Code. The time for filing claims will not ePke before four months Nom the headng date noticed above. YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a formal Request for Speual Notice of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any petition or account as provided in section 1250 of the Caufmin. Probate Code. A Request for Special Notice form Is available horn the wort deck. Attorney for petitioner. DOUGLAS BARNES DOUGLAS P. BARNES, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORP. 210 ALMENDRA AVE. LOS GATOS, CA 95030 409. 395-4800 (Pub SN 9/26.1013, 10/10) NOTICE Of PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF EDNA MAY GARROD CASE NO. 1.07-PR-161M To all heirs, beneficiaries, ueditors, wnting,ol credi- tors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of EDNA MAY GARROU A PETITION has been filed by NANCY G. COOPER in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. THE PETITION requests that NANCY G. COOPER be appointed as personal mpm- tentative to administer the estate of the decedem. THE PETITION requests the decedent's WILL and wdi. dis, if any, be admitted w Probate. The will and any codicils are available for I , examination in the file kept SAN JOSE, CA 95113 may be in person or by your Ing and visit the site listed neering or architectural his. UNDER A DEED OF TRUST BOOK 559 OF DEEDS, PAGE office of the Rea +Her by the court. IF YOU OBJECT to the granti- attorney. above and may visit other tory of the City, the County, DATED 3/10/2006. UNLESS 427; THENCE NORTH 37 of SANTA CLARA County THE PETITION requests g of the petition, you IFYOUAREA CREDITOROra sites as well. For more infor. the State or the nation YOU TAKE ACTON TO DEG. 53' WEST 355.72 FEET CALIFORNIA. Said Deed of authority to administer should appear at the hearing wnfingent creditor of the mation please contact the in that it represents a PROTECT YOUR PROPERTY, TO A STAKE STANDING Trust describes the following the estate under the and state your obi dims a deceased, you must file yaw Community Development Craftsman style home con• IT MAY BF SOLD AT A PUB. ON .THE SOUTHEASTERLYf property: Independent AdmiNriratl*n file written abjeclrons with .claim with the court and inlet Department at 408 868- structed in the early 19005. O[SAIE. IF YOU NEED AN LINE OF THAT TRACT Of YOU ARE IN DEFAULT of Estates Act. (This awhor- the court before the hearing. a copy to the personal repre- 1222 or review the She Visit The structure exhibits many EXPLANATION OF THE LAND CONVEYED By UNDER A DEED OF TRUST itY will .allow the personal Your appearance may be in sentative appointed by the Agenda on the City Website *f'ihe character defining NATURE OF THE PROCEED- SOLEDAD O. DE ARGUELLO, DATED DECEMBER 15, representative to take many person or by your attomey. court within four months at wwwsaWila.ca.us. features of such a home, and ET AL, TO W.T. RUCKER, actions without obtaining If YOU AREACP.EDITOR ore from the date of first APPIICAT10N has retained these features LNG AGAINST YOU, YOU ET AL, BY DEED DATED 2000. UNLESS YOU TAKE court approval. Before tak- donlingenf creditor of the issuance of tellers as provid- 807- 126/PSP07-0002 through history. The home SN OULD CONTACT A FEBRUARY 16, 1867 AND ACIION 70 PROTECT YOUR ing certain very important deceased, you must fide your ed in section 9100 of the (386- 35 -069) also fronts on a portion of LAWYER. RECORDED FEBRUARY 16, PROPERTY, IT MAY BE adlons, however, the per• claim with the court am! mail California Probate Code. The Church of the Ascension, Saratoga Avenue designated A pubic auction sale to the 7867, IN BOOK X OF DEEDS, SOLDATA PUBLIC SALE. IF $..al repesentative will be a copy to the personal repre- time for filing daims will not 12033 Miller Avenue /19550 as a heritage lane. highest bidder for cash, PAGE 133; THENCE ALONG YOU NEED AN EXPLANA- required to give notice to sentative apponted by the expire Irefae four months Prospect Road: -The appli- -The Property embodies dis• cashier's check dawn on a SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OON OF THE NATURE OF i terested persons unless court within four months from the hearing date cant retests desiggnn review tinctive characteristics of a state or national bank, check NORTH 44 DEG. 30' EAST THE PROCEEDING AGAINST they have waived notice or from the date of first noticed above. foram Il, minted beestand- style, type, period or method dcasv'^ by a state *r federal 68.24 FEET TO THE MOST YOU, YOU SHOULD CON. consented to theproposed issuanuofleftwsasprwid- YOU MAY EXAMINE the file ing sign in the R•1•10 distdd. of construction, or is a credit union, or a check WESTERLY CORNER OF TACT A LAWYER. action.) The independent ed in Pmbate Cade action kep by the court. If you are the Mgh density urehane valuabe example of the use dawn by a state ac federal THE AFOREMENTIONED 1.0 13033 MONTROSE Sl, administratim authority will 9100. The time for filing a person interested in the afddtectual foam sign wdl of indigenous materials savings and ban assaria- ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO be gamed uMess an inter- claims will not expire. before estate, you may file with the be mounted on a stone block in that 8 "is a 6riinguished lion, or savings asso.-whi SAID W DWIG TOMY; SARATOGA, LA 95070 r esfed person files an objeo four months frem the hear• court a formal Request for base and painted beige with example of a Craftsman m savings bank specified in THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH. (If a street address n lion to the Detition and ing date noticed above. Special Notice otlhe filing of brown lettering, which will silence.fmtaining ma nyy Section 5102 Of the Finanuai WESTERLY LINE OF SA common designation of _ shows good cause why the YOU MAY EXAMINE the file an inventory id appraisal of match the colors on the adla• characteristic details, sufh Code and authorized to do 1.00 ACRE SOUTH 36 DEG. PmDerty is shown above, ne court should and grant the kept by the court. If you are estate assets or of any Deli• cent dmrch buildings. The as mck walls, knee braces, business in this state wdl De 40' EAST 362.61 FEET 70 wartanry Is liven ac to its authority. a person Interested in the tion a account as provided combined sign and base will wood siding, and rnulti-Iite held by the duty appointed THE PLACE OF BEGINNING completeness or cWrest. A NEARING on the ppeetition estate, you may file with the in section 1250 f the to ppromnatety five feet wind the strong hand- trustee as shown below, of AND BEING A PORTION OF ness). will be held On OCTOBER 15, wuit a Request or Special C :UPomia Pro Code. A high and eight feet 1'4201he uaRed sense inherent in the all nght, title, and interest THE QUITO PANCAO. Said Sale of properly will 2007, 9:00 a.m. in Dept 15 Notice (Porn DE -154) of the Request for Special Notice teal will spell old "Church of building forms deafly a"' conveyed to and now held by A,P.N.. 397.26.002 be made in as is condhim locatedat 191 North First St., filing of an inventory and form is available Dom the the Ascension Roman date the design with bongo- the trustee in the hereinafter The ulM ersigned be without covenant or San Jose, CA 95113. appraisal of estate assets or court Berk_ Catholic" and will include lows from the period. The described property under disdains any liability for warranty, a press. or implied, If YOU OBJECT to the gami. ,fanypethion aaccount as Attorney for petitioner: thetimes ofthe masses. house remains today as a and pursuant to a Deed any inwrtedness of the re ardin ng of the petition, you provided ' Probate Code MATTH EW ACR058Y, APPLICATION 107.3% Bear representation of its of Trust described below. street address or other coin. orgn g Idle Dossession, should appear of the hearing Sedion 1250. A Request for CS84070524 (517 - 22.075) Annifil, era, in both design and The sale wdl be made, but non designation, if any, a wmtranms, in I,a `'h and sate }roar objections oc Slsedal Notice form Is avail- 2785 PARK AVENUE 15400 Peach Hlll Road: •the detailing, and fs an excellent without covenant or wart:^- shown above. If no street remaining p ndpal file written objections with able from the wort Clark. SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 applicant requests DesiSn example of CrallSman rest• ty, expressed or Implied, address or other common c'f the notes} zenred the court before the hearing. Attorney for Petitioner 408.370.7500 Review approval to construct dential architecture In regarding till,, possession, designation is shown, by said Deed of Trust wnh Your appeamme, may be in AGUILAR, ROBERT P. (Pub SN 9112, 9/19, 9/26) a new two•ztory single fami. Saratoga." or enwinbrances, to pay directions to the Loation of interest as in said note pro person or by your ahomey. '177 BUDD AVE. ly residence, Including a • The Property emtodies ar the renaming prindpal sum the property may be vided, advances, if any, IF YOU AREA CREDITOR or a CAMPBELL, CA 95008 basement and an attached contributes to unique pill of the in le(s) sewred by obtained by sending a under the terms of said contingent creditor of 111 9119, 9/26,10/3)07 e"�'% Secondary Dwelling Unit. cal characteristics represent. the Deed of Trust, with written request to. the Deed of Trust, fees, rhargs deceased, you must file your CN54199363M 'r'1 �/ The total floc area of the- Jog an established and 1-11, interest and late charges beneficiary within 10 days and expenses of the Trustee claim wfth the court and mad SARATOGA NEWS Leg81S proposed eside^ce and iar visual feature of a neigh thereon, as provided in the of the date of first PubUw• and of the trusts aealed by a copy,* IhepeaonNrepre- (Pub SN.9/1R9/26,f0/3) OP garage will be approximately berhood or district within ^ote(s), advances, under tion of this Notice of said Deed of Trust. seniatve app* med by the 6,699 square het. The net the Oty in that H is located the terms of the Dent Sale. Said sale coif be held on: court within Fourmonths NOTICE OF PETIT ION TO TN Size is approximately l.6 'on the portion of Saratoga of Trust, Interest thereon, Date: September t8, 2007 from the date of first ADMINISTER ESTATE OF NOTKEOFHFANNG acres and the sit, Js mrul R- Avenue that has been desi.- fees, charges and expenses FIRST AMERICAN TITLE, as OQCr6ER 10. 2007, A71fi:On Jssuence of letters as rovid• ALFRED JOSEPH MERNONE BEFORE PLANNING 1- 40,000. noted a heritage lane. N has of the Trustee for the total 7wstee By WT Capital Lender A.M. AT THE FRONT Ed- D TRANCE TO THE COUNTY ed in section 9]00 of the CASE Nit. 1.O7PR- 161970 COMMLSSION APPLICATION ADR07 -002 been designed and can- amount (at the time of the Services, Its Authorized Calirw I. Probate Code. The To all heirs, beneficiaries, M2Pf OF SARATOGAS (38946 -012) Sdpadanna: • structed in a distinctive initial publication of the Agent COURTHOUSE, 190 N. MAR time for filing claims wlfl not creditors, contingent credi- PLANNING COMMISSION Appeal of an Al. blirira[ive style, including rack detail. Notice of Sale) reasonably 7822 North Cdoni"A vnue, KE7 STREET, SAN JOSE. CA expire before four months tors, and persons who may announces the following Design Reviewappro4 for a ing on the parades. estimated t* be set fort 9Uite 101 Fmsno, CA 93711 At the time *rthe initial pub - from the hearing date otherwise be interested in public bearings an remodel with DrurdemoH• Section 2- Designation: The below. The amount may be (559) 222 -4644 licstion of this notice, the noticed above. -the wig or estate, or both of Wednesday, the "p day of lion and addition to the Property Is hereby designm- greater m the day Sale Status Une total' otal amowil of the unpaid YOU MAY EXAMINE the file ALFRED JOSEPH MERNONE, October at 7:00 pan. in the existing one -story home ed as a Historic Landmark f sale. Original 7rust*r(s): (714) 259.7850 balance of the obligation kept by the court. If you aka ALFRED J. MERNONE City Council Chambers local. located a 18524 Montpere pursuant to section 13- Sasan H. Raiszi, a single hop. /lwwwhdeStyasap.wm rewreA ty the above are a person interested J^ A PETITION has been filed by ad at 13777 Fruitvale Way. The proposal would 15.060 of the Saratoga City man Duly Appointed bra Berg, described Deed of trust the estate, you may file. XEVIN MERNONE and Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. enlarge the home by approx. Code. Trustee: first Amencan Tide A, Vice President and estimated with the court a formal GLENN MERNONE in the petals and plans are avail- imately 1,096 square feet Section 3- Publication: This Recorded 3/21885, as ASAP1904737 a enses, and advances is Request for Special Notce Superior Curt of GHhurlia, eta at the Saratoga (which includes a carport ordinance a a comprehen• Instrument No. 18851666 1n (Pub SN 9/26,10/3,10110) f507,351.87. n 's ossihle of the Offing of an J^veMay County of Santa Cara. Community Development conversion to enclosed sive summary there*f shall took -, page - of Official that at the time is Isale the and appraisal of estate THE PETITION. requests Department Monday garage). TOtal Proposed floor be published Once in a news- Records of the office of the OSTAC assets or of any pxtition or that KEVIN MERNONE and ihiough Thursday, 7:30 a.m. area,milT .garage would paper of general circulation Recorder of Santa Clara NOTICE OF TRUSTEES SALE opening bid may be less account as proxded in GLENN MERNONE be - S:OOp.m. Ifymhaveques -- be 2,730 square feet. The ii the City of Saratoga wit h. Co. atfSale: -a UNITCOD343048 CA than the final indebtedness section 1250 of the appointed as personal repre- lions Planners are millible maximum height of the pro- in fifteen (15) days after Its California Probate Code. A sentative to administer the f the obits counter posed structure wil not adoptbn. 1011712007 at 11:00 AM LOAN NO, 119 0 0114 4 61 Date: September 14, 2007 Request for Spedat N*tice estate *Elite decedent between the hours of 7:30 exceed eighteen feet (18). The foregoing ordinance was Mace of Sale: AT THE NORTH SAIAN T.D. SERVICE COMPANY form 75 available I'm the THE PETITION requests am. and the h Don. The maximum impuvims introduced and read m the MARKET STREET ENTRANCE INVESTOR NO1589SO34 a. said Trustee, SUSAN court desk. authority to administer All interested .persons may coverage would not exceed regular meeting of theyy City NOUSEE190O ORTH MAURNEf AP OI:SERVICEOOCOMPANY, EARNEST, ASSISTANT SEC, estat AUOmey for pettioner: - �Me ndent Administration - appear and be heard at the site area.bkhe lotf5 the zenet ls Saratoga held on theCSth day STREET, SAN JOSE, MARKET, as duly appointed trustee pANYRY T.D. SERVICE CGfA- DINA HOFFMAN a above and puce. if you 74 RN ER St., STE 201 of Estates Act. QNsauthor• dylleng, a decision of the 8520 square feet and tM1e of September, 2007, ant was NIA Amount of unpaid under the following 1820 E. FIRST ST., SANTA CRUZ, CA 95060dy will allow the personal planning Commission our• property is located i^ the adopted by the following balance and *tiler ,urges: described Deed of Trust 831- 423.1411 epresemative to take many scram to a public hearing in R•IO,000 zoning dislriA. vote following a second 73,497,994.34 WILL SELL AT PUBLIC SUITE 210, V.O. 60X 71988 (Pub SN 9/19, 9/26,10/3) actions without obtaining P g (pub00 9(26) eading on the 19th day of Estimated Street Address AUCTION 70 THE HIGHEST SANTA ANA, CA 92711.1988 murt apPr*v41. Before tak• cart, you may be limbed to September 2007: m other cammm design:-. BIDDER FOR CASH (in the We are assisting the NOTICE OF AMENDED " big certain very important ahsIng onty those issues you TN O ANCE Nit. 253 Ay.9; tint *( real property: 14195 forms which are lawful Beneficiary to wiled a debt PETITION TO ADMINISTER adlons, however, the per- or someone Nse raised AN ORDINANCE Of THE CITY Cmndlmembers IJU Hunter, Saratoga Avenue, Saratoga, tender In the United States) and any information we ESTATE OF. smat representative will be at the public hearms(s) OF SARATOGA DESIGNATING Kathleen King, Chuck Page, CA Legal Description: anl/a the cashier's, certi- obtain will be used for that WILLIAM ARTHUR SANI)EN- - required to give notice to described inthis notice, Orin THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS Vice Mayor BEGINNING AT A POINT fled or other clerks spkd- purpose whether received CASE NO. I-07-PR "1671110 interested persons unless written correspondence LAMPHFAR ROUSEAT39855 no Waltonsmfth, ON THE NORTHWESTERLY fled In Civil Code Section oralty or in wilting. T*. all hebs, beneficiaries, they have waived notice or delivered to the Saratoga SARATOGA AVENUE AS A MayorAUeen Kao LINE OF SARATOGA AVENUE 2924h (payable in full at if the Trustee Js unable to creditors, contingent aedi -. consented to the proposed Planning Commission at, or HISTORIC LANDMARK NOES: Nine AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY the time of sale to T.D. convey title for any rea -son, tars, and persons who may acti*nJ The independent port*, the public head^.. iAPN 39}45.01'» ABSENT: None CORNER OF THAT 1.00 Service Company) ali ght, otherwise 6e interested in ad ' ration authority *U In order to pe included in The City Cmndl of the CNty pBSpAIN: None ACRE TRACT CONVEYED BY title ant interest conveyed the successful bidder', sole the ,vis eriate.abofH of be gi5nfed unless an inter• the Nanning Commission's . of Saratoga hereby Ordains /s/ Aileen Kao, Mayor E.M. HUNT TO LUDWIG to and now held by it under and exdusive remedy WILLIAM ARTHUR SANOE N. esed person Mes an objet- ^formation packets, written s follows: ATTEST: THOMY, BY DEED DATED said Deed of trust in shall be the return of mmies AN AMENDED PETITION tion to the ,petition and - communications should Section 1- Findings: /s /Cathleen Boyer, APRIL 7, 1870 AND the property hereinafter paid to the Trustee, and the FOR PROBATE has been filed shows qwd cause why the be filed on or before the After careful review and City Oed, RECORDED APRIL 7, 1870 described: SU USSfel bidder shall have by MICHAEL I. SANDEN wurt should Imi grant the Tuesday, a weak before the consideration of the report (pub SN 9/26) IN BOOK 16 OF DEEDS, PAGE Trust- TED SALAH, no further recmrs<. n-1- in the Superior Court of alithority. meeting. and recommendations of 621, RUNNING THENCE ELADIA SALAH Recorded able, the expelled Werdng Californis, Yomty of SANTA A HEARING m the petition Ashe Asitwillbeheldonthe the Heritage Preservation AIANG SHE NORTHWESTER• December 22,2000 as lost, bid and /or postponement CLARA. - wiD be held an OCTOBER 10. day preceding the heanng Commission wnceming the v-�+- 8FE1 ee LY LINE OF SAID SARATOGA No. 15504033 in Bak -- hnformafion may be obtained THE AMENDED PETITION 2007, 9:00 a.m. In. Dept. 15 date fisted above as Dart, property at 13855 Saratoga . '!j) TI YStGG AVENUE SOUTH 49 DEG. 45' Page -- of Offleal Records by calling the following FOR PRO6ATE requests that located at 191 North First St. of the standard Site Visit Avenue (the Property) . WEST 60 FEET 70 A STAKE, oh the *Rice *f the Reorder telephone number(s) on the MICHAEL T.- SANDEN be San Jose, CA 95113. Committee agenda. She vis- together with the application Sales AND BEING THE MOST EAST- of SANTA CLARA County; day before the sale: appointed as peisorel repre- IF YOU OBJECT to the gami- Hs ocwr between 3:30 and and supporting materials, ERLY CORNER OF THE CALIFORNIA , Wrsult to (714) 480.5690 or you may sentative to administer the ng of the petition, yin S:UO p.m. The site visit is the City C .until hereby PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED the Notice of Default and access sales information ,slate of the decedent. should appear at the heami open to the pub8c determkies that: BY GEORGE T. OLDHAM, ET Election to Sell there under A. HEARING on the petit. and state your.1jectims The SNe Visit Committee will • The Poperty exemplifiesor N0710E OF TRUSTEES SALE A1, 70 HAMILTON MORGAN, recorded June 13, 2007 as af''"n^v-ascenlex.w m(web- wiil he held 0n 10/12/07 or file written objections convene at the City Hail reflects special elements of TS. NO.:07- 7,60.01 BY DEED DATED MAY 18, Inste No. 19468234 in 'sales. at 9:00AM in Dept. 15 loat- with the court before the parking tot at 3:30 p.m. on the hural, rodaL e<onom•. LOAN X0.:0602260 1922, AND RECORDED Book -- Page -- of iAU 75B188C ad at 191 NORTH FIRST ST., hearing. You appearance the day preceding the hell ir, political, aesthetic, engi- YOU ARE IN DEFAULT SEPTEMBER 13, 1922, IN Official Records in the (Pub SN 9119, 9/26.1013) • Attachment 5 rage i vi s Main Identity From: "Jerry Streb" <streb2 @pact�ell.net> To: <raymuzzy @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, August 05, 20071:15 PM Subject: Re: Your phone call on sign Ray, Thanks for your response and.your acceptance of the compromise. We have heard that the river cruises are great. Some friends did a similar one in Russia and loved it Regards; Jerry –_-- Original Message -- From: r muuy a_comcas1 -- To: Jerry Streb.. Sent: Saturday,. August 04, 2007 2:47 AM subject: Re: Your phone call on sign Jerry The compromise you proposed looks reasonable to me. We are in London and leaving for Vienna tomarrow. We will stay there several days and then take a river cruise through Germany to Amsterdam. Ray: --= Original .message. --- --- - -- From: "Jerry Streb" <streb2Opacbell _net> -Hi Ray; 1 knew you-were away but didn't know it was that far. We had several meetings regarding the content of the sign and would agree to drop the address and the web site info on the bottom but we would like to keep the phone numberthere. I hope you can agree with this compromise: Enjoy your Europe trip. Where are you visiting? Regards, Jerry — Original Message From: rmuzzyDcomcast_net To: stretCz bell.net Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 11:37. AM Subject: Your phone call on sign j Jerry L.got your phone call on the sign but we had already left on our vacation to Europe so I did not have a chance to get back to you. Pease forward via e-mail because I will attempt to check it once or twice a week if possible. Thanks for the good news on the Prospect Median. Ray • 8!5/2007 City ®f Saratoga. Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: Church Sign at 19550 Prospect Road Dear Neighbor, l am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments.. AH of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be, sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. / ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward.. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 -868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. • M signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed Y 9 P P P J the preliminary project plans. • Neighbor Name: Ray and Donna Muzzy Date: July 21, 2007 Signature: Neighbor Address: 19518 Eric Drive PAighbor Phone #: 408 - 257 -3707 If I have any initial concerns with the project l may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): 1- Sign illumination too high. - Reduce sign lighting wattage to 100 watts maximum 2- Amount of sign text to high compared with other major Saratoga churches. - .Remove address, phone number.and web address from sign text 3- Sign ascetics and consistency should be maintained. - Make Aluminum sign supports same color as back of sign Applicant Name: Church of the Ascension Date: Application Number: City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 - 20" 60te ed" Sidat��a�� • CHURCH OF THE A E i wL'L 10 AIL ROM AN CATHOLIC Weekend Masses: Sat. Span; Son. 1? 91 1 lam 4 Spro - ---.�, - --------------------- - =' 12" X 12- x 9. 1 {007811 • r F ,,.�✓i �.r%n KC '' ;1'' _�. ,t 'dr'�'t�yp '"b,' �l1��1' � li "s� 7' 1 � Gx. ; Y`� "� ➢t� �11� r��iz�$, �x�ry !d L T Yi '1!«,d3�Pl.', Y*b}w �'Y/i fb• a Sy a Y+ '+ii''Ftly, •'1p.'A� h h 1!.`titiik(", bM'. Y:t^T IL�15,..._ , `� ��,1 tr,- 1 �"1�� °q���, f41 hS� Y � 4. +jyycw"(d'�.��f, �' J �• � �N d ^�� p, 4�*✓tiXtay{x � � � �' mr°wL t<Lx + k �JS .. ..Frh 4 Y 'st X L � 7 i :1 WIN IX oil won mig, Mg. QN. C - , 0. XS "P. 06's DV -1 gug im G. , axw��, Y. IAP. eQ mg. j, AA Vg �11 jxl� A." sk 4 'yvaq, WINE" t. �4 'lee '4A 7-w:, 0 17 L WPD� 0 Curb & Sidewalk Planter Area Parking Lot Proposed new sign and new location for Church of the Ascension 12033 Miller Ave., Saratoga, CA . rk 74' New Sign Set Back 4 -.1 /2' from . Sidewalk v m Planter Areas �. 50'5" Center Line Prospect Road - - - --------------------- Planter Area Property Line 1 5' Sidew, eoLoy IF- L-1 J'- ' --- --_-'---_-- � _-- _ --�'' PtOOMTRD City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 19550 Prospect Road Dear Neighbor, �E�,.V� I�, EP28Z10! ' S CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY DEVEI.OPIV;F_ -N' 1'am proposing a. project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the .project, you may contact the. City of Saratoga at 408 868 1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that l am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: sV R _ 0' A 1 Date: L4 6 Signature: Neighbor Address: 9 _ el 0 Neighbor Phone #: O lf' I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Church of the Ascension Date: Application Number: New Church Sign City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10/24/06 • • City of Saratoga r Neighbor Notification Form DRESS: 19550 Pros � ZGG+ PROJECT AD Prospect Road p SEP " � G Dear Neighbor, CITY Or SARATOGA COMNAUNITY DEVELOPMENT I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent . neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. / ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact. the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. if you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 868 1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor IS Signature: Neighbor Address: Neighbor Phone #: _�2K —3& 6 If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Church of the Ascension Date: Application Number: New Church Sign City of Saratoga Revised 10/24/08 Planning Department City of Saratoga r ,r ;i ; IM Neighbor Notification Form j i PROJECT ADDRESS: 19550 Prospect Road SEP 6 LG CITY OF SAR TOGA Dear Neighbor, : COMMUNITY REVEL -OPINAENT 1 am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. . The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 868 1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed .the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: Date: 8 s 7 Signature: Neighbor Address: 6 3 6 % 1 °'r° gh' �0 `� So, 'n dos eA ;T9 12- Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): �Cor� Applicant Name: Church of the Ascension Application Number: New Church Sign City of Saratoga Revised 10/24/06 Dater Planning Department City of Saratoga 0 rL Neighbor Notification Form r ,� PROJECT ADDRESS: 19550 Prospect Road SEP 2 8 %G%1 LJ Dear Neighbor, CITY OF SARrTC}GA I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to pr `o01b oi� v+itJpti,''" an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. 1 ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 8681222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: G�0 � lcJ� AL Date: .-0 Signature: —Zd4 j�z7- Neighbor Address: LsP- -D,�t`7 V-9 LSL& c Neighbor Phone #: -6-f02,62 If I have any initial concerns with the project I. may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Church of the Ascension Date: 0 Application Number: New Church Sign City of Saratoga Revised 10/24/06 Planning Department City of Saratoga Notification Form n L rl,q j Neighbor PROJECT ADDRESS: 19550 Pros P ect Road B ��� SEP 2 8 WU Dear Neighbor, CITY OF SAIATOGA COMNfUN1TY DEVEI 0PP.'�'' ,1T I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in. advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks.that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 8681222 and speak with the. assigned. project planner.. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: e har\ Date: Signature: n Neighbor Address: Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following ( please attach additional sheets if necessary): "o-h Q Applicant Name: Church of the Ascension Date: Application Number: New Church Sign City of Saratoga-Planning Department Revised 10/24/06 • • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form ,ul U �� l� � ? LE i; ) PROJECT ADDRESS: P 19550 Prospect Road SEP 2 8 Hut Dear Neighbor, CITY Or'SAF ,TOGA, g COMMUNITY DEVEL OPMEPdT 1 am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 868 1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: ..� I�''''"� Date: �� C Signature: Neighbor Address: Neighbor Phone #: �/ 'S;, S-Y 721tr If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): 1 l DM, Applicant Name: Church of the Ascension Application Number: New Church Sign City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 Date: Planning Department City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 19550 Prospect Road SEP 2 8 2L7 Dear Neighbor, CITY of SARA, TOGA COMMUNI I Y UCVELOP11JIEN' I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. 1 ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY, and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be --advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 8681222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below-certifies that i am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. , Neighbor Name: Signature Neighbor Address:_ Neighbor Phone* #: Date: -/--7 If I have any initial concerns with'the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach -additional sheets if, necessary): Applicant Name- Church of the Ascension Date: Application Number: New Church Sign City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 _ • • • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 19550 Prospect Road '� SEP 2- e, 200 CITY OF SAi�ATOGA Dear Neighbor, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT l am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. / ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 8681222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. (� r Neighbor Name: .0 Y Date: —0? Signature: Neighbor Addre Neighbor Phone #: VOC s 7"X33 If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Church of the Ascension Date: Application Number: New Church Sign City of Saratoga Revised 10/24/06 Planning Department City of Saratoga h L ' Neighbor Notification Form L SEP 2 81007 PROJECT ADDRESS: 19550 Prospect Road CITY of sPATOCF, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors -and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that-you familiarize yourse_ if with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project; "you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 8681222 and speak with the assigned project planner. - My signature below certifies that I am. aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: wr Cam-- Date: D Signature: a4i /Q Neighbor Address: G l t b Ascr?I�S�e�'� g Neighbor. Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Church of the Ascension . Date: Application Number: New Church,Sign . City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 City of Saratoga ! { FE Neighbor Notification Form SEF 2 8 2007 PROJECT ADDRESS: 19550 Prospect Road C171 Y CF Sp..r',, =TOGA COMMUNi TY DEVELOPMENT Dear Neighbor, l am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. 1 ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 8681222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project pla s. Neighbor Name: 1 C ��` Date: Signature: — 5 GeirySi Neighbor 0 Neighbor Phone #: Z2 - ° If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Church of the Ascension Date: . Application Number: New Church Sign City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 Planning Department City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 19550 Prospect Road Dear Neighbor, (� CCr 1E IYul] I' u� .� ... I , u SEP � 8 2UU CITY OF sAIRATGGA COMIVIUNI T Y DEVELOPMENT i am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are"preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 868 1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies. that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. / Neig hbor NameV Date: Signatu7Wr Nei ess l 9 Neighb -hone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Church of the Ascension Application Number: New Church Sign City of Saratoga Revised 10124/06 bate: Planning Department • • • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form 1 PROJECT ADDRESS: 19550 Prospect Road SEP 2 8 `0 I GTY OF s.ARATOGA Dear Neighbor, COMMUNITY DEVELOP .iE! !T 1 am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. 1 ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 868 1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: I(� Date: Signature:, tX Neighbor Address: -1 86-7 -Z A R0VV0/R' L CT Neighbor Phone #:5 0 A CST" 27 If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): n ), I V 6N— Applicant Name: Church of the Ascension Date: Application Number: New Church Sign City of Saratoga Revised 10/24/06 Planning Department City of Saratoga �,� r Neighbor Notification Form D Co ' r 1 ,) PROJECT ADDRESS: 19550 Prospect Road SEP 282007 G CITY Or SAR;` T 0GA Dear Neighbor, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 868 1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that 1 am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: -o i r �- �''� Date: 0 7 Signature: T�� Neighbor Address: C &0 D �R _ �"o 7 D Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): d� Applicant Name: Church. of the Ascension 'Application Number: New Church Sign city of Saratoga Revised 10/24/06 Date: "$ AV (- G Planning Department • • :7 City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 19550 Prospect Road SEA j? ]I WW 1 r E C L J�i IjUi L' Dear Neighbor, CITY OF SA� - OG� CONi�itiITY DEVEL' OPI . ENT 1 am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. 1 ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. if you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 8681222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name Signature: Neighbor Address:�°� Neighbor Phone #: �a-a % "- q.163 Date: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Church of the Ascension Date: 0 Application Number: New Church Sign City of Saratoga Revised 90/24/06 Planning Department City of Saratoga IDS ` II Neighbor Notification Form � SEP 2 8 HOW J OF SAR�T - OGA PROJECT ADDRESS: 19550 Prospect Road CITY DEVELOPMENT Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of. the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. 1 ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may. occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the. project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 868 1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. M Y signature nature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. r Neighbor Name: Lti Date: 2 206 Signature: Neighbor Address: Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns'with the project 1 may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Novo C- . Applicant Name: Church of the Ascension Date: _Application Number: New Church Sign City of Saratoga Planning Department 'Revised 10/24/06 • • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 19550 Prospect Road Dear Neighbor, D) pis ILI L fI Id' !l SEP % 8 2007 1-17Y V` SARATOG -' C0MM6N1TY DcVE-LOo�MIILE ' 1 am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to. review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. i ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 868 1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project planes. Neighbor Name: ' ` Date: q �" Signature: \ Neighbor Address: S bK-o a--cY-0 0, Cwt �s� J Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Church of the Ascension Application Number: New Church Sign City of Saratoga Revised 90 /24106 Date: Planning Department City of Saratoga D L r f E r Neighbor Notification Form SEP ? 8 Z1'U I PROJECT ADDRESS: 19550 Prospect Road CITY Or SAR; OGA COMMUNITY Cc V EL 0PI IMIENT Dear Neighbor,. I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 868 1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: l C Date: Signature: ''� Neighbor Address:. Neighbor Phone #: If I have.any_initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional - sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Church of the Ascension Application Number: New Church Sign City of Saratoga Revised 10/24/06 Date: Planning Department • ]J.eighbor Notification Template for Development Applications Date:. p-v VY 1 q ,7LCO -f in� PROJECT ADDRESS: 19550 Prospect Road U u SFP ;,),H ZOO _Applicant Name: Gfl UJtC1f or- THE PSG5NS1041 CITY OF CARATOGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Application Number: Use Permit PO& IV, w H U�c tt S (GNU Ot✓. P2as 'EG7 R�, The Saratoga planning Commission requires applicants to work with their neighbors to address issues and concerns regarding development applications prior to the evening of the public hearing on the proposed project. The Planning Commission does not look favorably upon neighbors who jail to voice their concerns and issues when. solicited by applicants prior to the public hearing. Staff and the ,Planning Commission prefer that neighbors take this opportunity to express any concerns or issues they may have directly to the applicant. Please ensure the signature on this document is representative of all residents residing on your properly. Irrespective of the opinion expressed below, you may reserve the right to amend your opinion at a later date and communicate it to the City of Saratoga_ IAMy signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work: and I do NOT have any concerns or issues which need to be address by the applicant prior to the. City's public hearing on the proposed project. ElMy signature below certifies the following: I have reviewed the project plans; I understand the scope of work; and I have issues or concerns, which after discussion with the applicant, have not been addressed. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): NeipboTName: Ji7�%,� � �o�v Few, or Neighbor Address: /9 S3 7 P7 s/4 jQPr I —OfA L A Y. 00, 7& eighbor Phone #: City of Saratoga r Printed: Planning Department 0 ent 6 0 • 1307 Regency Dr. San Jose, CA 95129 September 17, 2007 Ms. Suzanne Thomas Assistant Planner City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 Dear Ms Thomas: E C E � V E 0 SEP 2 82007 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The purpose of this letter, the attached drawings and pictures is to provide you with a complete summary of all of the details regarding the proposed new sign at Church of the Ascension. Location - The present sign, at the comer of Miller and Prospect, has been deteriorating for several years. Our proposal is to remove the present sign and replace it with a new one located on Prospect Rd., about 70 feet west of the driveway which enters the church parking lot from Prospect Rd. next to Worner Hall. This location for the sign is well beyond the 50 foot clear area on either side of the driveway which is of concern to the Saratoga traffic and engineering groups. There presently is a 10 foot wide area between the sidewalk and the parking lot which contains juniper bushes. The sign would be approximately 4.5 feet from the sidewalk, in these bushes.. These details are shown on Pages 1 and 6. Sign and base - Details of the sign and the base are shown on Pages 2, 3, and 4. The sign would be mounted on a stone block base. The stones would be almost identical in color and texture to the stones used for the church and hall construction. We feel that the stone base provides a richer, finished feel rather than merely having the sign mounted on two posts stuck in the ground. Picture 1 shows the block pattern, size, color and texture that would be used. After visiting many sign shops, we decided that high density architectural foam was the best material for the sign. All of the shops suggested that material rather than the wood that we were initially considering. They claim that it is preferable to wood from a durability and aesthetic viewpoint. The text to be added to the sign would be masked and the remaining background would be sandblasted to a depth of about one half inch. This sandblasting leaves a natural, rough surface on the background. This background would be painted with Kelly Moore Navajo White (See color sample below Picture 2). The letters would be painted a darker brown color to match the current trim on the church and hall. That dark brown color, which is a custom paint mix, is shown in Picture 2. The times for the Masses will be painted on a %" PVC plaque which is removable. You will note from the drawings that the background on the plaque will be the dark brown color and the Masses will be the Navajo White color, exactly the reverse. of the other lettering and the border. That plaque will be screwed to the sign. By using the her plaque, we could easily replace it if the • Mass times change without incurring the large expense of completely replacing the entire sign. The top of the sign is curved to blend with the roof architecture of the church which will be in the background. We believe that this design and the earth tones are very much in keeping with the surrounding architecture of the neighborhood and also are very similar to other church signs in Saratoga. I have enclosed samples of the architectural foam and the %4" PVC material. This architectural foam is also called HDU (High Density Urethane). I have enclosed a copy of a "Frequently Asked Questions" list from a company that makes this material. You will note that the material has been in use for over 40 years. The company we are using for the design and fabrication of the sign is called Art Works. John Espinola, the artist and owner, has made other signs in this area using this material. I have enclosed a page from his web site which shows an existing sign made from this material at Preston Wynne, The Saratoga Spa. That sign was installed about 12 years ago. A lady at Preston Wynne said that they have done nothing to the sign in those 12 years. I have also included Picture 3 which is a photograph of the sign that I took on September 12, 2007. You will note that the sign has withstood 12 years of exposure to the elements in excellent fashion. Lighting and Landscaping- Pages 5 and 6 show these details. After much discussion with the people at the sign shops, we are proposing that fluorescent lighting be used. These two 48" fluorescent lights would be housed in a waterproof, • 96 ". fixture mounted on the ground in front of the base and extending across the full width of .the base. This fixture would be adjustable so that the light would be aimed only at the sign. We felt that this was important even though the only area behind the sign is the church and the parking lot. The total wattage would be 64 watts (32 watts per bulb). We chose the fluorescent lights since they give a more uniform, softer light than the typical spot or flood bulbs. The lights for the sign would be connected to the same circuits. as the existing parking lot lights so they would only be illuminated when the parking lot lights are on. I have also enclosed a spec page from the company that makes the lights we are proposing. It will meet all of the building and UL requirements for external lighting. During the construction, we plan to minimize the removal of the current junipers. If possible, we will save the current juniper bushes between the sidewalk and the lighting fixture. If not, we will plant new bushes so that the lighting fixture will not be visible from the front. Those new bushes would match the ones currently there. Reaction to these plans from. neighbors — I personally visited neighbors in the areas completely surrounding the proposed location, including some across the street on Prospect Rd. in San Jose. I got 19 Planning Department Notification Forms signed. ALL are supportive of the project. Eighteen of those had no concerns. Mr. Ray Muzzy had 3 small concern areas-which we have alleviated. I have enclosed copies of all 19 of those forms.: I have also enclosed .a diagram showing the location of our property and the locations of the homes from which I got a signed response. Those • from which I could not get a response were. either not home or not available. I believe that this letter and the associated materials should provide all of the necessary information about our proposal. However, if you need any additional information, please call me. Sincerely, Jerry Streb for Church of the Ascension cc: Fr. Joe Galang, Pastor, Church of the Ascension • • Proposed new sign and new location for Church of the Ascension 12033 Miller Ave., Saratoga, CA Curb &Sidewalk -7 of Planter Area --,/ New Sign d CD Parking Lot Planter Areas 50' 5" Center Line Prospect Road ------ - - - - -- ----------------- - - - - -- Planter Area Property Line 5' Sidew N 07- TO SC41- ' I� 1-'6- --�- & 0 CHURCH OF THE IL ROMAN CATHOLIC • Ze"X 16 1b- H D U FOAM 7A NP)5LA 5 7-60 5/690GI LATe*,F-l"lSH ALL ro -5 JAI cr i"A 6, -tz - aF -5-T-95 4- ?1F11r 6,44,Pt-& T v }To wyf TF 6 i C-Al PV 1T .5 <-- f t- FOA PIWIT R-owlv C-Zo-5/11, C-oi-6 OP )64c--A"6l1Nj9 VIE S r G-A 4- AAIr POAM !_L`!,cL��i�.�LUM.INUrn ANGLE -3ea. CHURCH Ot T �� IF. ASC NSION 1ZOiViAN CATHOLIC rim 7 fiTE/�iU y x a ib •TEXTUA E FOR 7-416 B19s.'-- H Y-Q YTE I ro 0CICS 9 i �,,,�pOr�NG•� � 12" • : 1 O g,• pg 3 0,�, 58" Iq D, 1�) A C K, ",W= . 5 v D 6:5 A/V 0 Ar D w, n ��a�ti E pPrl�ry D "RK C]71RE# Z - Ul jml i; I I li �j i! I i t d !All I u !� li 1 P,q l lV-t ED To W;A`TG /f /,►D �TiiG EAi7` COL,oR �-m P4GE 4 of 2 - W Feagovagcong fiofilo lvv Fh C �j U RC H OF ASCENSION S 4 ROLMAN CATHOLIC ar- OiLlm 121, x 12", 9 -3 F • " P, 1, r. r- s - 0 r- 6 Po 1.1 �44 77-5� < b L' 1 S H ES /A -P, E A -D r-_ 7A I L ovcD )A/ -144 V5 AREA . • • • f t G ?v lc E v I- T �E U 5 c D POA 5i(-Al AA sE BL.00\ Mrre/t/V, sltE, Go Lo/, +TEX TORS r (G. I- v/` G -,A- siuN Gvforo Mtn D /qR(t 61ZOW41 601-c,,( FOA LE77E/�S ` B4�lt of i� 4fi PI „ai 1i + /hii�� • i jfEUY litoo - FAIIJIT S/�MPLE ,�� eK -RouNr� of 51641 ArtWorks: Custom Signage MuraOs & Paintings Architectural Giaso cmstnm VgnEfge Schools Boat Lettering UVentG Abou The ArNst conzact Us • Preston Wynne Ceramic square tiles mounted on finished foam design. Shell tile, letters and frame around sign are all HDU foam Finished size: 42" x 91" p. �J custom Page I of I Signage 15 i (rAl IA15T14U- ED ASOL17- 1IT11,1- 61-0c,11-Efl ON 6A6-K OF )6u i4 00f- 0,PP + 1'# 6-,(" MAki4ft- 1.07) Web-Development by-PSD 7 PI61V1w:05 • http://www.artworksby,john.comlsignalze/preston--,wnne.htrn $I6-Al )9 5 OF 'Tjt7 --j�O'7 9/17/2007 * • • A Product d C-1.1 Enterprises Co. IIEagrom lD Frequently Asked Questions Concerning Precision Board 1. Why does Precision Board stand up so well in exterior environments? Precision Board high density urethane is made of millions of tiny bubbles, or cells, that are mostly separate from each other. Since these cells are not interconnected neither moisture or temperature can enter PB. This means PB does not expand or contract and therefore does not warp or crack as a result. iiiii• i• iifiiiiit•i iiiiii• i�• iiiiiiiii •iiiiiiii•i•i•iii•ii•iiti 2. How long has high density urethane been around? High density urethane has been used commercially as exterior insulation starting with the Saturn S -II moon launch vehicle in 1964, and as exterior insulation on the Alaskan Pipeline in 1970, still in service. Currently, in addition to being used as insulation for homes, water heaters, refrigerators, and freezers, it is used for signage, tooling, model making, boat building, and in many other places. Urethane is very versa- tile and track proven. Precision Board has been manufactured by Coastal Enterprises since 1972. • i i i i i i i i i i• i i i i i ti i i••• i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i fi i i i i• i i iii i i i 3. Is Precision Board heavier or lighter than wood? The density of redwood is approximately 26 pounds per cubic foot. The standard Precision Board density for sandblasting is 15 pounds per cubic foot. A 1" thick 4'x 8' sheet df PB -15 weighs 40 pounds. Asimilar sheet of redwood weighs almost twice as much. • iii •iiiiiiii.�iiiiiiiiiii•ifii•• iii •tiisi•itiriiiiiii•iii••iiii•ii 4. What.does density, mean and how does it relate to high density urethane? Density is a standard term for determining the weight of a cubic foot of material, any material. A cubic foot is a cube that is 12" x 12" x 12 ". Its weight is the density. The higher the density the thicker the cell wall And the tougher and heavier it is. Thicker cell walls means it takes more pressure to crush the cell wall. Heavier means there is more material in its makeup so it costs more. The only physical difference between a 6 pound density PB and a 30 pound density PB is the thickness of the cell wall. The cell wall thickness only determines toughness and has no affect on its weatherability, solvent resistance, etc. •iiiii•iiiiiiciiiliii 6 6 6 4 6 6 6 6006d44 iiiyii• iii +iiii�•i�iiiiiiiii• 5. Can I fiberglass over Precision Board without the solvents eating it? Yes. None of the commonly used solvents such as lacquer thinner, methylene chloride, naphtha, mineral spirits, etc. will attack Precision Board. Coastal Enterprises Co. i P.O. Box 4875.Orange, CA 92863 -4875 • ( 771 -4969 (800) 845 -0745 • Fax (714) 771 =6422 E -Mail Mu- ®precisionboard.com 0 www.precisionboard.com ""NINE STEP LIGH'T'ING &LET S A � INC. 20742 PLUMMER ST. CHATSWORTH, CA 91311 'DEL. 800/814 9392 ;. FAX. 818 %700 9330 -w-vvw.%stephgh'r .carte These powerful Signlighters adapt easily in size and wattage to your particular needs. Standard Features, CAT # - OSL-SL + Wattage Housing � [iertslons :4 Finish l? Electrical L WarrarittK [ `- a n SULK Bra Cbpp le .. ;:�: Sagnl���hters °:are cc�i�str ��ete�d. out of 13W-277V - 13Vatt 277 !Volt - Ballast Pace lAr :l al p} Replagement items �?eplacement Lens Cnfy ;. . Model # Wattage USL- SL- 39W -2' 3X13 Watt PL 2' 120V - Lamps Included re n, B ..:Wh " Pati. a r�te: <: 4X13 Watt ILL 3' 120V - Lamps Included #onz t,W a USL- SL- 64W -4' ---,A 2XF32T8- 4' 120V Electronic - No Lamps USL- SL- 64W -8' 2XF32T8- 8' 120V Electronic - No Lamps ac � l ssted Wet 5X13 Watt PL 4' 120V - Lamps Included OSL- SL.- 104W -S' 8X13 Watt PL 8' 120V - Lamps Included . S fixtures are guaranteed for 2 years r r )ainst niech nt'cal defects ira s anufactdnng, exciustrte of lamps - .. 3 le .. ;:�: Sagnl���hters °:are cc�i�str ��ete�d. out of 13W-277V - 13Vatt 277 !Volt - Ballast Pace lAr :l al p} Replagement items �?eplacement Lens Cnfy ;. . Model # Wattage USL- SL- 39W -2' 3X13 Watt PL 2' 120V - Lamps Included OSL- SL- 52W -3' 4X13 Watt ILL 3' 120V - Lamps Included €?SL- SL- 32W-4'----L, 1XF32T8- 4' 120V Electronic - No Lamps USL- SL- 64W -4' ---,A 2XF32T8- 4' 120V Electronic - No Lamps USL- SL- 64W -8' 2XF32T8- 8' 120V Electronic - No Lamps ®SL- SL- 78W -4' 5X13 Watt PL 4' 120V - Lamps Included OSL- SL.- 104W -S' 8X13 Watt PL 8' 120V - Lamps Included . 2" 3- 4T' 0 ;f "Uri To ,6,6- ()5er P iS (, '/- dwl,�: � #A.s 32 W/ rFLd C-�)