Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-13-2008 Planning Commission Packets February 13, 2008 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION SITE VISIT AGENDA DATE: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 — Approximately 3:30 p.m. — 5:00 p.m. PLACE: City Hall Parking Lot, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue TYPE: Site Visit Committee SITE VISITS WILL BE MADE TO THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ROLL CALL REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA AGENDA 1. Application# MOD08 -0001 15211 Bellecourt Drive Labio 2. Application# MOD07 -0003, CLTP08 -0001 15400 Peach Hill Road Arimilli t o n 0 3. Applic a i # ADR 7 -0022 13574 Howen Drive Bijan/Sangam 4. Application# CUP07 -0001 12768 Saratoga Avenue Metro PCS The Site Visit Committee is comprised of interested Planning Commission members. The committee conducts site visits.to properties that are new items on the Planning Commission Agenda. The site visits are held on the Tuesday preceding the Wednesday hearing, between 3:30 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. It is encouraged that the applicant and /or owner to be present to answer any questions that may arise. Site visits are generally short (10 to 20 minutes) because of time constraints. Any presentations and testimony you may wish to give should be saved for the Public Hearing. During the Site Visit, the Planning Commission may only discuss items related to the project. The agenda does not allow any formal votes or motions on the proposed project or other matters. The Site Visit is a fact - finding meeting where the Commission may discuss the item and ask questions from or hear statements from members of the public attending the Visit. No comments made during the Site Visit by the Planning Commission are binding or required to be carried through to the formal public hearing where actions will be taken on the proposed project. PA\PC SITE VISITS \Site Visits\2008\SVA 021208.doe CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION 0 AGENDA DATE: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 - 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Council Chambers /Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting ROLL CALL: Commissioners Manny Cappello, Rishi Kumar, Robert Kundtz, Susie Nagpal, Linda Rodgers, Yan Zhao and Chair Joyce Hlava PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: MINUTES: Draft Minutes from Regular Planning Commission Meeting of January 23, 2008 ORAL COMMUNICATION: Any member of the Public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three minutes on matters not on this agenda: The law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Planning Commission may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Planning Commission direction to Staff. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS- PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTION TO STAFF: REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on February 7, 2008 REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS: If you wish to appeal any decision on this Agenda, you may file an "Appeal Application" with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15- 90.050 (b). CONSENT CALENDAR: None PUBLIC HEARINGS: All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. Applicants /Appellants and their representatives have a total of ten minutes maximum for opening statements. Members of the Public may comment on any item for up to three minutes. Applicant/Appellants and their representatives have a total of five minutes maximum for closing statements. APPLICATION #MOD08 -0001 (510 -03 -012) Labio —15211 Bellecourt Drive: The applicant requests a Modification to a previously approved Design Review application. The modification is for a 110 square foot addition to a 6,008 square foot house approved by the Planning Commission on July 11, 2007. The proposal includes demolition of the existing 2,364 sq. ft. residence. The maximum proposed impervious coverage is 35% of the site. The maximum height of the proposed buildings is 26 feet. The lot size is 45,784 square feet, and the site is zoned R1- 40,000. (Heather Bradley) 2. APPLICATION #MOD07 -0003, CUP08 -0001 (517 -22 -072) Arimilli, 15400 Peach Hill Road: - The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of an eight foot tall, 97 square feet Cabana within the rear yard setback and modifications to an approved Design Review application. Modifications includes 1) altering the layout of the driveway near the front entrance to avoid conflict with existing water meters, 2) proposed rear yard landscaping to include concrete patios, swimming pool, and pond, 3) P: \PC Agendas\2008 \021308.doc construction of the cabana, and 4) the removal of five trees (including three Oak trees) to accommodate the revised driveway location and the removal of one Eucalyptus tree for the construction of the cabana. The property is zoned R -1- 40,000. (Chris Riordan) APPLICATION #ADR07 -0022 (393 -38 -007) Bilan /Sangam, 13574 Howen Drive - The applicant requests Design Review approval to demolish the existing second floor of the approximately 3,217 square foot residence and construct a new second floor. The existing second floor is approximately 457 square feet and the proposed second floor is approximately 498 square feet. Changes to windows, siding, and a new roof are also proposed. The lot size is approximately 11,270 square feet, and the site is located in the R -1- 10,000 zoning district. Design Review approval is required pursuant to Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.060. (Shweta Bhatt) 4. APPLICATION# CUP07 -0001 (386 -14 -016) Metro PCS, 12768 Saratoga Avenue - The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to locate a wireless facility at the Presbyterian Church near the intersection of -Cox Avenue and Saratoga Avenue. The project consists of a new cross structure with concealed antennas and a new equipment cabinet enclosed in a shed. The Tot .size is approximately 3.74 acres and the site is zoned R- 1- 10,000. (Shweta Bhatt) DIRECTORS ITEM: - City Council will be having a joint meeting with the Planning Commission on March 19, 2008. COMMISSION ITEMS: None COMMUNICATIONS - None ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING Wednesday, February 27, 2008 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers /Civic Theater 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to partigipate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (408) 868 -1269 or ctclerk@saratoga.ca.us. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102- 35.104 ADA, Title H). Certificate of Posting of Agenda: I, Abby Ayende, Office Specialist for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga was posted on February 7, 2008 at the office of the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 and was available for public review at that location. The agenda is also available on the City's website at www.saratooa.ca.us If you would like to receive the Agenda's via e-mail, please send your e-mail address to planning(d;saratoga.ca.us NOTE: To view previous Planning Commission meetings anytime, go the City Video Archives at www.saratoga.ca.us • PAPC Agendas\2008 \021308.doc MINUTES SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 PLACE: Council Chambers /Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting Chair Hlava called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Cappello, Hlava, Kumar, Kundtz, Nagpal, Rodgers and Zhao Absent: None Staff: Director John Livingstone, Contract Planner Heather Bradley, Planner Shweta Bhatt and Assistant City Attorney Bill Parkin PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES — Regular Meeting of January 9, 2008. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Nagpal, seconded by Commissioner Cappello, the Planning Commission minutes of the regular meeting of January 9, 2008, were adopted with corrections to pages 11, 13, 19, 26 and 28. (7 -0) ORAL COMMUNICATION Mr. Gene Zambetti, Big Basin Way: • Said he was here to provide a progress report on the relocation of tenants at Brookside Apartments. • Reported that it has been a long and difficult endeavor. • Reminded that he had promised to try hard to find comparable units for his tenants. • Advised that they had meetings with 15 tenants. Some were relocated and others have left. Mr. Colin Gray, Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road: • Explained that they have reached agreement with all tenants. All of them are on board with concessions we've made. • Added that a lot of effort went into this task and that 60 apartments were available nearby. • Said that they are addressing issues as promised and that the tenants will be out by the end of February. Commissioner Cappello advised that one of the tenants attended the last. Planning Commission meeting complaining that little was being done to assist these tenants. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 2 Mr. Colin Gray: • Said that there was some confusion over the mandate over what would /could be done. • Added that many tenants would not return calls. • Assured that repeated attempts were made to address each individual but most were not receptive. • Stated that although monetary assistant had not been mandated, some has been offered. Commissioner Kundtz asked Mr. Colin Gray if the Commission could reasonably be assured that tenants will not be back before them in two weeks. Mr. Colin Gray replied yes, that should be the case. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS — PC DIRECTION TO STAFF Director John Livingstone reported that it is been very quiet on this issue. It is possible that all sides are satisfied. Chair Hlava directed staff to let this Commission know if things come up. If nothing is mentioned, the Commission will assume all is fine. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA Director John Livingstone. announced that, pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on January 17, 2008. REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS Chair Hlava announced that` appeals are possible for any decision made on this Agenda by filing an Appeal Application with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15- 90.050(b). CONSENT CALENDAR There were no Consent Calendar items. PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM NO. 1 APPLICATION #07 -366 (503 -69 -0120 KEYASHIAN, 21818 Via Regina (Continued from the January 9, 2008, meeting): The applicant requests Design Review approval to add 1,977 square feet to the existing upper floor and convert 1,707 square feet to the existing basement creating a lower floor. The total floor area of the new house will be 5,677 square feet. The maximum height of the proposed building will not exceed the 26 -foot height limit.. The maximum impervious coverage will not exceed the allowable 25 percent of the net site area. The lot size is approximately 53,562 square feet and the site is located in the HR zoning Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 3 district. Design Review approval is required pursuant to Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.060. (Heather Bradley) Ms. Heather Bradley, Contract Planner, presented the staff report as follows: • Explained that the applicant is .seeking approval to demolish an existing two -story residence and construct a new 5,700 square foot two -story. • Described the new home as being a contemporary Mediterranean style with brown the roof, stone veneer with stucco band, and details including columns and vertical metal railings. Distributed the color board. • Reported that there would be a decorative entry gate at the street. The driveway will be widened to allow for sufficient Fire access. • Said that two Ordinance - protected trees would be removed and replaced with trees of their value. • Advised that a geotechnical clearance has been obtained. • Said that Design Review findings can be made. • Recommended Design Review approval. Commissioner Nagpal asked about allowing a two -story on a predominately single -story street. Planner Heather Bradley said that there are several two -story homes in the neighborhood. Commissioner Rodgers: • Pointed out that there are residences on the opposite hillside that are outside of noticing distance. • Expressed appreciation for the orange story poles that offer those residents an opportunity to realize that something was pending here. • Asked staff if there have been any inquiries. Planner Heather Bradley replied no. Chair Hlava asked if Condition #6 in the resolution is referring to all landscaping or just front yard landscaping. Planner Heather Bradley replied that it refers to the landscape plan. Chair Hlava suggested adding to the Condition #6, "Per Exhibit A." Chair Hlava opened the public hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Mr. M. Keyashian, Applicant and Property Owner: • Said that he loves this neighborhood. • Reported that they had shared their design plan with the neighbors, who were supportive. • Added that he implemented their input. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Ms. Andrea Costanzo; Project Architect: • Reported that they have worked with staff, who did a great job. • Added that they are available for any questions. Chair Hlava asked if the outer buildings would be removed. Ms. Andrea Costanzo said that two of the four would be removed. Commissioner Kundtz asked if her client is aware of the $70,000 tree bond amount. Ms. Andrea Costanzo replied yes. She added that they were surprised at the amount. Page 4 Commissioner Nagpal expressed appreciation for the story pole installation, and the fact that they were left in place for two weeks. Ms. Andrea Costanzo advised that they had to go back after the storm to repair them. Ms. Linda Parsley, Resident on Via Regina: • Said her house is located up.the hill. • Stated that she had felt bad when the storm blew down their story poles. • 'Said that this home's' design is nice and will be beautiful. • Reported that she has an ingress /egress easement that runs along the Keyashian's driveway although she has not been able to access this easement since another neighbor has completely fenced in their property. • Asked that this project's proposed gate not interfere with access to this easement. Chair Hlava advised that there would be a turnaround on this site for Fire access. Commissioner Kundtz asked Ms. Parsley if her concern is that this gate might impede their ability to access their property via their easement on the neighbor's property.. Ms. Linda. Parsley replied yes.. Commissioner Kundtz suggested . that the applicant be asked if he is aware of this easement. Ms. Linda Parsley said that she would also like to avoid the planting of tall trees on this property that might grow, to block mountain views. Commissioner Kundtz said that staff could verify what types of trees, are required. in the landscape plan. Commissioner Zhao asked Ms. Linda Parsley if the easement is only for emergency access use. Ms. Linda Parsley replied that it is an ingress /egress easement located adjacent to the existing driveway on the Keyashian property. • 1] Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 5 Attorney Bill Parkin cautioned that this easement issue is a private civil matter beyond the City Atto y p y purview of this Commission. He suggested asking the applicant his understanding of the easement and leaving it at that. Planner Heather Bradley clarified that the actual easement is up the hill on the property above the slope and not on the Keyashian property, which is why she did not raise that issue in her staff report. Commissioner Rodgers asked if the gate and /or pilaster would interfere with access onto the easement. Planner Heather Bradley replied that she did not think so but that could also be made a condition of approval and also that it is addressed on the construction drawings. Chair Hlava cautioned that this is about as much as the Commission can do. -. Ms. Linda Parsley: • Said that the owner of the property on which she has an easement has to be brought into compliance with fencing regulations. • Added that Code Enforcement staff is currently enforcing this fencing violation. • Stated that otherwise, this project is beautiful. Mr. M. Keyashian assured that there would be no interference with the neighbor's easement by his gate. He added that he does not have plans for tall trees but rather prefers to plant fruit trees. Chair Hlava closed the public hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Chair Hlava suggested adding text to Condition 13 that states, "The front gate and pilaster shall not intrude into the easement." Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Nagpal, seconded by Commissioner Rodgers, the Planning Commission granted Design Review approval to allow the construction of a new two -story residence on property located at 21818 Via. Regina, with correction to Condition 6, renumbering of Conditions 7 to 12 and addition of Condition 13 to read, "Easements on construction drawings shall indicated that the gate and pilaster will not intrude on the easement," by the following roll call vote: AYES: Cappello, Hlava, Kumar, Kundtz, Nagpal, Rodgers and Zhao NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM NO. 2 Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 6 APPLICATION #07 -029 397 -25 -009 Maesumi 13921 River Ranch Circle: The applicant requests Design Review approval to demolish the existing home and shed and construct a new two -story home. The total floor area of the proposed residence and garage will be approximately 4,355 square feet. The net lot size is approximately 18,839 square feet and the site is zoned R- 1- 10,000: (Susanne Thomas) Director John Livingstone presented the staff report as follows: • Explained that the applicant is seeking Design Review approval to allow the demolition of an existing single -story Ranch -style house and the construction of an approximately 4,300 square foot, two -story Craftsman -style house. • Distributed the materials .board. • Said that the project; incorporates high quality materials including a carriage -style wood. door, high -end front door and windows and using darker earth tone colors. • Reminded that a Planning Commission Study Session was held in February 2007. The project's original design was Mediterranean. Since the original design and following numerous meetings with the applicant, the second floor was reduced, the setback for the second story was increased, and only one window faces the neighbor to the left side. • Reported that neighbor correspondence has been received. • Said that during the, site visit the Commissioners also visited the adjacent neighbors' properties to see views. Stated that the project meets General Plan findings and Design Review findings. Commissioner. Rodgers pointed out that there is still an objection to the one window upstairs in the master bathroom. She suggested using some method to block any potential view onto the adjacent property such as opaque windows or some sort of screening trellis. Director John Livingstone said that this particular• window is a clearstory window used to provide light and ventilation. This sill of this window is at a six -foot height. Commissioner Nagpal said that she is used to more slopes on the second story of a Craftsman -style house. She asked if there was any discussion on how to break the roof up on the front view instead of it being at the 26 -foot height all along that view. Director John Livingstone said he couldn't say as he is filing in for the project planner this evening. He suggested that perhaps the applicant could reply. He added that this is a hybrid design and that more roof means less a visible second story . Commissioner Zhao asked .for the size of the bath window on the left side. Director John Livingstone said he would defer that question to the applicant. Commissioner Kumar asked if an operable skylight might be feasible here. He asked what the impact might be if there were no window on that elevation. Director John Livingstone said that an operable skylight is possible. He added that windows are used to break up an elevation and add character. • Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 7 Chair Hlava opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No 2. Mr. Omid Shakeri, Applicant's Representative: • Explained that he is here on behalf of Mr. Maesumi. • Reported that Mr. Maesumi is excited to move into Saratoga and has worked for the last year on this design. • Said that issues of bulk, size and privacy have been resolved. • Assured that they have tried to accommodate requests from neighbors, staff and the Planning Commission. • Reminded that the second floor has been set back considerably (63 feet) from the street. Dormers have been used to break up the roof. • Added that their lot coverage is only at 21 percent and they have maximized setbacks. • Asked the Commission to approve Mr. Maesumi's plans tonight. Commissioner Nagpal asked why there is not more articulation on the front view along the 26- foot long ridgeline that is all the way along the front elevation. Mr. Cherine Bassal, Project Architect: • Said they have attempted to avoid the look of a two -story as seen from the street. They had to move the second story far back. • Pointed out that one of the two dormers is fake. It is just an architectural feature to help . provided symmetry with -the other one. Commissioner Zhao asked the size of the bath window. Mr. Cherine Bassal said that it is two feet wide and four feet tall. The sill is at a six -foot height Commissioner Zhao said that she shared the concern with Commissioner Nagpal about the ridgeline. It is pretty bulky. Mr. Cherine Bassal said he worked it out with staff. It was the only way. He added that the two - dimensional drawing does not do justice to the design. He pointed out that the roof slopes back. Commissioner Rodgers asked if the master bath window could incorporate obscured glass, stained glass, plants or perhaps fixed louvers. Mr. Cherine Bassal said that obscured glass is a good option. Any recommendation by this Commission would be followed. Commissioner Kundtz suggested that a better view of the slope is visible on Sheet 4. Commissioner Kumar said that it still gives the appearance of bulk. Mr. Cherine Bassal said that a two - dimensional drawing does not give a good representation. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 8 ' Chair Hlava. said that a,portico and the garage stick out in front but look flat in the drawing. Other things in the front will lessen the perception of bulk. Mr. Cherine Bassal reminded that staff recommended the second dormer to balance the appearance. Chair Hlava said that while the coverage is 21 percent it could be up to 60 percent. If it were at 60 percent a very large one -story house could be constructed. She asked why a two -story. Mr. Cherine Bassal said that they had talked about a single -story residence but with the required setbacks and Water District easements, it was hard to work with the space available and that made a single -story impossible. Mr. Omid Shakeri: • Added that a one -story is hard to design on this odd- shaped lot. Reported that Mr. Maesumi has two small children who need a playground in the backyard. • Said the idea is not to maximize the size of the house but rather to design one that fits Mr. Maesumi's needs. With a six -year old and 12 -year old, he needs four bedrooms. • Stated that the house designed is functional for this family. • Suggested that this proposed roof design is easier on the eye versus building. area with windows. • Assured that this roof is not flat and square but rather one will see a gentle slope going back. This was away to control the mass of the building. Commissioner Rodgers said if one stands at the front of the house and looks up';' the - straight line is viewed uphill. Mr. Omid Shakeri said that one is not looking at it straight on due to the right side of the - garage and angle of the house placement. Mr. Tom. Murphy, Resident on Jerries Drive: • Said that his property is across the creek. • Advised that he had submitted correspondence earlier today. • Asked that the Commission not lose sight of the rear of this property. Nothing in the plans mitigates bulk as seen from the rear. • Pointed out that this is a creekside setting with Saratoga Creek largely untouched and in a natural state.. Said he hopes the Planning Commission keeps in mind this unique natural setting. Mr. Walter Shaw, Resident on Jerries Drive: • Said he also submitted a letter yesterday. • Said that he has spoken with Planner Suzanne Thomas, who was very cooperative. • Explained that his concern is the two -story. • Agreed that the focus on the bulk issue is on the front and not on the rear. • Expressed concern relative to privacy and this natural setting. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 9 • Said that he is concerned about easements relative to the creek and setbacks. Mentioned an existing chain link fence. • Reiterated his concerns as being easements, two -story and privacy impacts as well as the bulky appearance from the back view. Director John Livingstone cautioned that sometimes the Water District itself sometimes installs chain link fences. Ms. Jamie Van De Ven, Resident on River Ranch Circle: • Acknowledged staffs hard work. • Said that one cannot hide the fact that this is a two -story, 4,000 square foot home in a single -story neighborhood. • Added that it is incompatible in bulk and height. It would tower over other houses and will be the eyesore in this neighborhood. • Expressed concern over the second -floor bath window and said that she loves skylights and has two skylights herself. • Advised that she would be fine if they removed that window. • Stated concern over property values and pointed out that one house recently went on the market although she cannot say it is because a two -story is proposed here. • Said that a two -story. does not belong in this neighborhood. Mr. Mike Van De Ven, Resident on River Ranch Circle: • Said that he and his wife are the only ones who would see that elevation and they are okay if there is no window on that wall. Chair Hlava cautioned that this Commission must consider this from good design practices perspective. Ms. Jamie Van De Ven said that she has two operable skylights and assured that this owner would like them. Commissioner Cappello asked the Van De Vens if their issues go away with the removal of this window. Mr. Mike Van De Ven replied yes. Ms. Jamie Van. De Ven said if the window is gone or a single -story house is proposed. However, there is still a bulk issue but she had thought that a two -story was difficult to prevent. Commissioner Nagpal asked if bulk was their chief concern. Ms. Jamie Van De Ven said bulk and privacy. 0 Commissioner Kumar asked what if screening were to be installed. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 10 V Ms. Jamie Van De Ven said that it would take too long to grow in enough to provide sufficient screening. Commissioner Kumar asked the Van De Vens if they consider this house bulky as viewed from their property to the rear or just the front elevation of this proposed home. Ms. Jamie Van De Ven said all around. Commissioner Kumar asked if bulk is more of an issue to them than privacy. Commissioner Rodgers:' • Said that there are a number of ways to provide privacy and allow the applicant to have the window they want. Questioned if the Van De Vens would support use of skylights, screening vegetation, trellis, obscured glass and /or fixed slat windows. Chair Hlava said she has a similar window in her bath and cannot see out. Mr. Omid Shakeri: • Said that Mr. Maesumi is open to use of obscured glass on this bath window. • Said that in working with staff and the neighbors they have tried to address all comments. • Added that Mr. Maesumi wants a livable house with a yard for his children. •_ Stated he would appreciate the Commission's approval. Chair Hlava closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 2. Commissioner Kundtz asked if economic impacts and /or property values are the purview of this Commission. City Attorney Bill Parkin said that this issue is not a finding in Design Review. Commissioner Nagpal: • Stated that. this is an irregular lot in a sensitive creekside setting. • Added that this is a single -story neighborhood zoned R -1- 10,000. • Said that the issue is good design. • Said that her problem with this design is that it does not minimize the perception of bulk. • Added that she has no issue with the two -story element if,it is sensitively designed. • Stated that the limitation is the odd - shaped lot that requires exceptional design. • Advised that it is difficult for her to make two of the required findings relative to compatible bulk and height. • Informed that she cannot support this request. Commissioner Cappello: • Said that Commissioner Nagpal has made some good points that he can agree with to a large degree. • Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 11 • Said that as for Finding #1 that requires avoidance of interference with views and privacy, he does believe this design does a better job than the previous one. He can make that finding. • Said that while he would have loved to see a single -story or two -story with basement level versus a two -story on this parcel, the bulk finding can be made in the affirmative. • Stated that the compatibility with the neighborhood finding can be made also. He said he agreed with staff that there are many two -story homes in this area. • Said that this applicant has done a lot to address issues such as setbacks and minimization of the second story. The window has been addressed by its six -foot sill height. With a toilet located directly below this window, it would not offer access to views of neighboring property. • Added that since the applicant is willing to utilize opaque glass in this window, he is willing to condition that requirement. • Advised that he would support this project as it is. Commissioner Rodgers: • Said that there have been lots of changes but are they enough. • Suggested that this is kind of a Cape Cod styled home. It will look small. The an reduces the bulk a bit as seen from the front. • Said when considering a one -story versus two -story residence, it must be remembered that a one -story house can be 18 -feet tall. J& • Expressed the need to preserve the existing landscape so she is willing to support a two - story house on this site. • Added that there is no single -story overlay in place for this area so the applicant is entitled to a two -story residence. • Stated that the design has to be exceptional. • Reminded that this, applicant has worked with staff and came to the Planning Commission in a Study Session. This project meets the criteria for good design. • Added that the issue of privacy has been raised. She reminded that this Commission was able to visit the adjacent properties and there is no visibility. • Said that the applicant has expressed willingness to use obscured glass on the window facing the Van De Ven property. She would like to condition that. • Said that a basement is not a good option on this property as it would be wet and damp all the time. It is not fair to ask this applicant to put up with that. • Stated that she can make all Design Review findings. Commissioner Kumar: • Explained that he was not yet a Commissioner when the Study Session on this project was held in 2007. • Agreed that this is a fairly irregular lot that requires optimum design. • Stated that he thinks there are perceptions of bulk and that other options are available to reduce bulk. • Said that he cannot make the findings for bulk and height but that privacy can be worked around. • Said that the problem of bulk is a major one that needs some redesign to solve. The story poles were overbearing. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 12 Commissioner Zhao: • Said that she wished that a perspective rendering had been available as she has problems with the perception of bulk due to such a long 26 -foot high ridgeline. • . Stated that she is not against a two -story house. • Advised that she cannot make the bulk findings and seeks some creative way of doing the roopine. • Informed that she cannot support at this time. Commissioner Kundtz: • Stated that the privacy issue has been dealt with. • Said that redesign might compromise necessary living space needed by this family. • Said that with the use of opaque glass on the bath window he can make the Design Review findings. Chair Hlava: • Said that she has given a lot of thought to this and was concerned about bulk. • Advised that this lot is down the hill. • Said that there are other two -story homes in the area. • Stated that she can make the bulk and height compatibility findings. • Said that obscuring the -bath window in some way is an acceptable solution to the privacy concern. • Stated that'she can make the findings for approval. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Cappello, seconded by Commissioner Kundtz, the Planning Commission granted Design Review approval (Application #07 -029) to allow the demolition of an existing home and shed and construction of a new two -story residence on, property located at 13921 River Ranch Circle, with the condition for opaque glass on the second - story,bath window on the left elevation being made permanent, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Cappello, Hlava, Kundtz and Rodgers NOES: Kumar, Nagpal and Zhao ABSENT: None ABSTAIN:. None Chair Hlava advised that there are 15 days for appeal. PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM NO. 3 APPLICATION ZOA07 -0001' (City- Wide): The Planning Commission will consider a draft ordinance that will update existing regulations regarding fences, walls and hedges. The draft ordinance proposes to 1). establish an exception process that would allow property owners to exceed the maximum permitted fence height; 2) add fence height limitations around driveway Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 13 aprons; and 3) clarify ambiguous language and areas of the Code that are currently difficult to enforce. (Shweta Bhatt) Ms. Shweta Bhatt, Planner, presented the staff report as follows: • Explained that the proposed amendment is to regulations for fences, walls and hedges. • Reminded that the Commission has held two Study Sessions on this Ordinance. • Reported that the environmental review has been completed and no comments have been received directly related to the environmental document. • Stated that some input has been received from community members in response to the ordinance update that has been included in the packets. • Stated that one goal of this update was to establish an exception process. that allows property owners to request modifications to the ordinance standards. That provision has been added. • Distributed a sheet outlining the City Attorney's recommended changes to the text. Chair Hlava suggested that each Commissioner advise of any proposed changes to this Ordinance. Commissioner Cappello said flag lots are one area of concern. Planner Shweta Bhatt said that Page 2, Subsection E regulates front property lines that abut side property lines. Chair Hlava suggested flag lots be treated as a separate fencing entity and allow up to six -foot fence heights all around a flag lot. This seems clearer. City Attorney Bill Parkin said that a flag lot would have to be defined. Chair Hlava said that it would take a lot of staff time to figure out flag lot fence height allowances under this Ordinance as it is. Commissioner Cappello said this could be addressed by titling Subsection E with Flag Lot and the rest of the text already there. Chair Hlava asked if this is okay with the City Attorney. Mr. Bill Parkin replied absolutely. It provides some clarity. He said his written comments are just clarifying suggestions. Commissioner Nagpal said she takes issue with green fences and asked if they can be exempted. Planner Shweta Bhatt said that the term "hedges" is not defined in the code. She added that there is an exemption for green fences. 491 Commissioner Nagpal asked if there is a definition of green fences. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 14 Commissioner Cappello said.there was one but it has been deleted. Commissioner Nagpal pointed to page 3. Commissioner Cappello said that.it is deleted in the Attorney's recommendations. City Attorney Bill Parkin said that he suggests the use of the term "hedge" versus "green fence." Chair - Hlava said that hedges should not be in the view triangle of driveways obstructing visibility. Commissioner Nagpal agreed that they are not exempt from visibility issues. Chair Hlava said. that she has a problem with pool fence regulations in hillside districts. With the limit to 10 foot wide decking around the pool, she is not sure how to apply that standard. Commissioner Rodgers said that 10 feet is fine or 4,000 square feet total enclosed area. Commissioner Nagpal said that the 10 -foot standard is proposed while the 4,000 square foot standard is current. Chair Hlava suggested eliminating the Fence Exception Finding #5 that requires neighbor sign off. Commissioner Cappello asked if an owner goes to his neighbors and one objects to .a fence proposal," can they still come to the Planning Commission or does he have no option to go forward. Planner Shweta Bhatt said that the owner could request Planning Commission review. The Commission could approval with the required findings. She said that she did not believe one neighbor refusing to sign off precludes a fence exception hearing. Commissioner Rodgers said that the Commission could consider with written agreement. Commissioner Nagpal said that Finding #5 could better read, "Considers the view of other adjacent property owners." Commissioner Kundtz suggested that the neighbor simply acknowledge receipt of the notice like is done with other applications. Chair Hlava said that while the Commission always considers what neighbors have to say, it is not a finding requirement. Commissioner Rodgers said that an immediate neighbor has a closer relationship to a shared fence but she did not think that written consent is feasible. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 15 r d Commissioner Cappello said the process as outlined m the draft is goo but an uncooperative neighbor seems to result in no appeal process being available.. He suggested that an appeal process be added to the language when there is not neighbor agreement. Commissioner Nagpal said that the Planning Commission makes exception findings. Commissioner Cappello said that as the Ordinance is written currently the Commission could make no decision if that finding is not met. Chair Hlava said that this is why she wants Finding #5 removed. Commissioner Nagpal asked if all findings must be made or just some of them. Chair Hlava said she reads it to mean all findings must be met. Commissioner Rodgers said she has some language issues relating to pool fencing. . Commissioner Kundtz said he wants to consider Authorities /Approving Bodies. Chair Hlava opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 3. Ms. Mahnaz Khazen, Resident on Victor Place: • Said that this is a most interesting subject to her as she has a flag lot. • Stated her agreement with the idea of allowing six -foot tall fencing all around a flag lot. • Said that she absolutely agrees with the proposal to remove Finding #5 requiring neighbor approval. The governmental body needs the right to review notices, hear comments and make a decision based on fact. • Questioned the differences between the gate pilaster height differences allowed between wrought iron versus wood gates. Iron gates have a 7 -foot maximum and wood gates an 8- foot maximum. • Stated that she likes the fact that light fixtures are not included and thanked staff for that. • Inquired about regulations for fencing adjacent to scenic highways. • Explained that she has a property on Quito Road that is both scenic and noisy. How would that be addressed? Chair Hlava said that scenic highway refers to Saratoga -Los Gatos Road. Commissioner Nagpal agreed that Quito Road is not a designated scenic highway Commissioner Rodgers said that it might go up the hill on Highway 9. Ms. Linda Parsley, Resident on Via Regina: • Said that she has a flag lot. • Said she would like to see these changes as she currently has 10 different kinds of fencing surrounding her flag lot. There is a 60 -foot long solid wood fence, hedges, corral fencing, wire fencing and a fence with lattice. Nothing matches. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 16 • Added that the saddest part is that wildlife has no access to her property or very limited access. Deer no longer have access. • Reminded that she has an ongoing complaint about one neighbor's new fence. • Stated that staff has said that since all the fencing in this area is illegal, they would not enforce just that one property but rather it should be treated as a civil matter, relative to the access to the easement. • Reported that she had to. have a survey done when a neighbor placed a fence three -feet into her property. That fence had to be relocated to the property line. • Asked for clarification on parallel fences and walls. Commissioner Nagpal said that there is 'horizontal distance required between a retaining wall and fence. Commissioner Kundtz said that this relates to retaining walls coming down a hill.. Director John :Livingstone said that no changes are proposed to #C. It is applied when retaining walls are too close together. Ms. Linda Parsley said she would like to see the fence removed off the retaining wall. Director John Livingstone said that height is currently measured from the lowest side. Ms. Linda Parsley said she would like to see fencing limited to 4,000 square feet as fencing prohibits wildlife trails. She said it would be. nice if wording were added that encourages neighbors to work with neighbors on what kind of fencing would be put in. Chair Hlava said that this Commission has no desire to get between two neighbors on the issue of what types of fencing they want. Ms. Priscilla Ho, Resident on Woodmont Drive: • Said that when deer are on the property whatever you plant one day is gone the next. It is hard to plant .when deer traipse across the property. • Mentioned the potential foreight -foot high deer fencing. • Stated that she would love to have a gorgeous yard and may need that size fence to keep the deer out of it.. • Recounted that contacting neighbors is not always easy. For one request, she called one neighbor a number of times to no success. • Said that it looks nicer if the center of a wrought iron gate is higher than the pilasters by one to two feet rather than lower at the center of the gate. Commissioner Rodgers asked if this could interfere with visibility. Ms. Priscilla Ho said that her gate is set back 30 feet. Chair Hlava closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 3. Chair Hlava asked the City Attorney to go over his comments. • Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 17 City Attorney Bill Parkin: • Said that there is some inconsistency between taking measurements from the bottom of a retaining wall versus the highest point. • Added that the text should be stricken on how to include retaining walls. Chair Hlava said that there is a big difference between fencing on a hillside versus residential areas. Commissioner Cappello said that with every case where there are different grades there is a retaining wall. It could be just 2 x 12 wood board at the base of a fence to retain soil. Commissioner Nagpal said the use of higher versus lowest point for measurement needs to be considered. Right now the practice is to use the higher point, with the lower point for retaining walls. Commissioner Cappello said consistency is needed. Commissioner Nagpal suggested the higher point. Director John Livingstone said that there are pros and cons. It could appear that a three -foot high fence looks six -feet tall if measured from the higher point. Chair Hlava said she agrees with the measurement from the higher elevation. City Attorney Bill Parkin: • Suggested defining hedge and pulling green fences out. Height limitations should not apply to hedges. • Agreed that Finding #5 of the exception findings could be eliminated. • Said that trellis should be renamed entryway trellis. • Said that a width limit should be assigned to entryway trellis. Commissioner Cappello suggested the term pedestrian entrance. Commissioner Rodgers said that the width of the opening would define it. Commissioner Nagpal suggested a five -foot width for entryway trellis openings. City Attorney Bill Parkin: • Said that the term "yard" should be eliminated and "setback areas" used. • Advised that his changes on Page 3 represents simplified language on the issue of .pilasters. Commissioner Nagpal asked why the one -foot maximum difference between wrought iron versus wood fence pilaster heights. Saratoga Planning ,Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 18 City Attorney Bill Parkin explained that pilasters are allowed to exceed the fence height by two feet, which equals an eight -foot maximum height. The wrought iron gate in a front yard is limited to five -feet in height to a maximum height of seven feet for the pilasters. Commissioner Nagpal said it. might be appropriate to have a gate taller than five feet in height on a larger property. The issue is the size of the property. Commissioner Cappello said that this might be an exception issue that can be brought to the Planning Commission. He added that materials in addition to wrought iron should be considered as long as it is another see - through material. Chair Hlava reminded that wood gates are not allow right now. Planner Shweta Bhatt said that current Code limits wrought iron front gate heights to five feet. Staff is not proposing a change. Director John Livingstone said that the Commission could amend to _ allow other metal produces as long as they are in an open format. Commissioner Cappello said that there are new materials all the time and should be considered if they are see- through. Chair Hlava said if the material is not wrought iron she wants it to go through a review /exception process to ensure it is a good quality and attractive material. City Attorney Bill Parkin: • Said that he has made a minor language change to page 4 for clarity. • Said that a very minor' language suggested change on page 5 adds, "on a single site. "` • Said that on page 6, the staff insertions of "solid ", have been deleted for fences on arterial streets. • Suggested that the term "Existing Non- Conforming Fencing" be amended to read "Existing Legal Non - Conforming Fencing." • Cautioned that amnesty is not granted with this.ordinance amendment for existing fences. Commissioner Nagpal asked if dog fencing is considered electrical. Commissioner Rodgers said she is more concerned with fences that would hurt a child. Chair Hlava asked why the wire fence prohibition is being removed. City Attorney Bill Parkin said that chain link fencing is limited to athletic courts. Non- hillside properties can use chain link while hillside properties cannot. Director John Livingstone said that chain link fencing is allowed in areas other than hillside. • • is Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 19 Chair Hlava said that not all properties on hills are in a hillside district. She suggested that the questions and comments raised be given to staff and brought back as a clean draft ordinance. There are still too many issues. Commissioner Nagpal agreed. Commissioner Rodgers questioned whether all decisions have been made yet. Commissioner Zhao asked where the hillside districts are located. Chair Hlava said that they are within another part of the ordinances. Commissioner Nagpal reviewed proposed edits: • Page 1 — consistent with higher point, the hedge issue is fine. • Page 2 — consensus to removing Finding #5 and instead refer to noticing. Commissioner Kundtz suggested the text to Condition #4 be added to read, "adjacent property owners noticed and no negative comments received." Chair Hlava suggested, "Impact on immediate adjacent neighbors is considered." Commissioner Zhao reminded that noticing is automatic.. Chair Hlava reiterated her suggestion to strike Finding #5 and add her text, "adjacent property owners noticed and no negative comments received." Commissioner. Nagpal: • Entryway trellis width is identified as five feet. • Said that language should be added to Finding #4 that states that no adverse impact to adjacent neighbor(s) or general vicinity. • Section E should read "Flag lots and front lot line not adjacent to the street." Commissioner Rodgers said that there is the issue of flag lots with different types of fences all around. Suggested the need for an exception if a flag lot becomes fenced in at more than 4,000 square feet via fences on surrounding properties. Commissioner Kundtz said that compatibility is questioned each and every time. Commissioner Rodgers said that a flag lot has the potential of feeling like "Folsom" prison if it has six foot fencing all around. Chair Hlava said that since hillside lots are a minimum of two - acres, they would not feel like Folsom prison. City Attorney Bill Parkin said that this would have to be thought out carefully. Commissioner Cappello asked about the enclosed flag lot and when it becomes an issue. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 20 • City Attorney Bill Parkin said the last person coming along is not the best way to deal with it. Director John Livingstone: • Said that there are two questions here. • Stated that one question is how to address compatibility on a flag lot. However, unless there is an exception required, they just put their fence in. • Said that the next question is what to do if a flag lot in a hillside district that is surrounded by other properties' fences results in an enclosed fence area in excess of the allowed 4,000 square feet. • Added that this is a rare exception. Commissioner Rodgers suggested that perhaps anyone putting in a fence that is adjacent to an interior flag lot would require some sort of review. Director John Livingstone said that this would be an administrative decision that could be appealed to the Planning Commission. Chair Hlava added that someone who buys a flag lot knows what he or she is getting Commissioner Nagpal reminded that use of the term "yard" is replaced by "setback area." Director John Livingstone suggested adding, "edge of pavement." He added that gates couldn't go that close as they need a queuing area at least one car distance back from the street: Chair Hlava suggested text, "Pilasters for wrought iron gates need to be located behind the triangle. Commissioner Cappello suggested adding Fence, Wall, Pilaster, or Compact Hedge. Chair Hlava reiterated that they must be outside the triangle. Commissioner Nagpal said there were no changes to page 3. Page 4 should add "parallel walls" and delete reference to fences. Chair Hlava said -that there are so many possibilities for pool fencing outside of enclosing 4,000 square foot. of area with fencing.: It does not seem clear. Director John Livingstone said that a pool has to be fenced around. If the entire lot is fenced in (non - hillside), they don't need to have pool specific fencing. However, some still fence in their pools for child safety. In hillside districts there is a limit to 4,000 square feet enclosing fencing. A lot of people want more. When an owner has a very large pool and patio area, they may not want to fence in just 4,000 square feet. While the fence around a pool is. exempt, the ordinance would allow 10 -foot area surrounding the pool to be enclosed in fencing to create usable areas around these pools. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 21 i Chair Hlava said that if this is appealed to the Planning Commission she mi ht g be willing to support that provision. Commissioner Nagpal said that it allows for an exception. Commissioner Rodgers said that something like this comes to the Commission for judgment. She said she has no problem with a pool enclosure and 10 feet deck area around a pool. Chair Hlava said the owner could always appeal. Commissioner Rodgers suggested adding swimming pool fence. City Attorney Bill Parkin said that if the enclosed 4,000 square foot area is enough to fit the pool, the use of the 10 -foot area around the pool might only be permitted if an exception is sought. Commissioner Rodgers said that the word "solid" should be added to page 6. City Attorney Bill Parkin suggested "solid or any other type of fence." Commissioner Nagpal asked if existing legal non - conforming situations could be appealed. 0 City Attorney Bill Parkin said any Planning Commission decision could be appealed. Chair Hlava said that enough changes have been made. Should the amended draft come back to the next meeting or to a Study Session. Commissioner Rodgers said that the issues of chain link outside of hillside districts; flag lots closed in on hillside districts and notice issues need further clarification. Chair Hlava asked if the continuance should be to a date certain or uncertain. Director John Livingstone suggested a date certain as long as Shweta Bhatt and Bill Parkin have time to go over .the changes. He reminded that additional noticing is not required for items continued to a specific date. Commissioner Nagpal asked Director Livingstone if he has a suggested date. Commissioner Rodgers said that while she does not expect an additional mailing, she would like to see something reported in the newspaper to advise the community on the status of this update. Chair Hlava suggested either February 27tH or March 12tH Director John Livingstone said that March 12th would be fine. He clarified that appeals may be final at Planning Commission level. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 22 Commissioner Nagpal agreed that administrative decisions are appealed to the Commission. If the Commission makes the original decision, those decisions are appealed to Council. Planner Shweta Bhatt said that this is included in the Ordinance. Chair Hlava. said that the whole issue of chain link fences was deleted. Director John Livingstone said that it was added back in another spot. They are allowed in non- hillside zoning but not allowed in hillside zoning. Commissioner Cappello suggested forbidding them all around. Commissioner Nagpal said that with shrubbery growing on it they are invisible Commissioner Hlava said that if is hard to do without chain link fencing with agricultural uses. Commissioner Rodgers said that those are existing fences. Commissioner Cappello added that they could be grandfathered. Director John Livingstone said that wood fences don't last.. When they fall, replacements would meet ordinance standards. However,, chain link fences are around for a long time although new ones can be prohibited. Commissioner Nagpal reiterated that they are not visible if landscaping is growing. on them. Commissioner Cappello asked if they should be'allowed with screening shrubbery. Commissioner Rodgers said that no one would see them to complain about them. Commissioner Kundtz said that they are allowed around pools. Commissioner Rodgers said also around athletic courts.. Director John Livingstone said that chain link fencing painted black requires less maintenance and plants can grow on them. Commissioner. Zhao asked why, chain fink fencing should not be allowed on hillside properties. Commissioner Cappello said because of wild life. Commissioner:Zhao said that one couldn't see these chain link fences when they are located far back in their backyard. Commissioner Rodgers said that animals couldn't pass through them. Commissioner Zhao said they could not pass through a wood fence either. • • Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 1 Page 23 Chair Hlava said that chain link fencing would still be in the ordinance. Director John Livingstone said that this issue (chain link) can be brought back as is and changes could be made at the next meeting. He said that a whole updated package would be brought to the next hearing on this ordinance. Commissioner Nagpal said that she wants this ordinance to be reflective of what's actually happening. Commissioner Rodgers suggested that staff come back with some "either /or" language. Commissioner Cappello said it could be exception versus stay as it is. Ms. Priscilla Ho pointed out that chain link fencing disappears on a larger property. It is better looking than a solid fence would be. Chair Hlava suggested chain link be allowed on properties over one acre in size. Commissioner Nagpal suggested zoning R -1- 40,000. Chair Hlava suggested lot size versus zoning. Commissioner Rodgers said right now chain link is prohibited on hillside properties. Commissioner Nagpal suggested that it be handled separately on hillside versus residential zoning. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Kundtz, seconded by Commissioner Rodgers, the Planning Commission CONTINUED CONSIDERATION TO ITS MEETING OF MARCH 12, 2008, consideration of a draft ordinance to update existing regulations regarding fences, walls and hedges, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Cappello, Hlava, Kumar, Kundtz, Nagpal, Rodgers and Zhao NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None DIRECTOR'S ITEMS There were no Director's Items. . COMMISSION ITEMS Commissioner Rodgers advised that she would be absent from the April 9, 2008, meeting. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 2008 Page 24 COMMUNICATIONS There were no Communications Items. ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING Upon motion of Commissioner Cappello, seconded by Commissioner Kundtz, Chair Hlava adjourned the meeting at approximately 10:52 p.m. MINUTES PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY: Corinne A. Shinn; Minutes Clerk Item I • REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • • Application No. & Location: 08-0001; 15211 Bellecourt Drive Type of Application: Modification to a previously approved Design Review Applicant/Owner: Labio Staff Planner: Heather Bradley, Contract Planner Meeting Date: February 13, 2008 APN: 510-03-012 Department Head: 69 ' John F. Livingstone, AICP /- SUBJECT: 15211 Bellcourt L34AC 2AC APN: 510.03-012 Y) 500' Radius �7 L6 C> f. 15 C. D NE D IVE C-' 1court ......... ... 3 4 ,____..,,+_x.... �.....,,{,Ya�-- X62 :_ "" I la• iJ 36 ... ....... ---------- O N WAY t KI 15211 Bellecourt Drive Application No. MOD 08 -0001; 15211 Bellecourt Dr. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY Application filed: 01/18/08 Application complete: 01/18/08 Notice published: 01/30/08 Mailing completed: 01/25/08 Posting completed: 02/07/08 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant requests a modification to a previously approved Design Review application. The modification is for a 110 square foot addition to a 6,008 square foot residence approved by the Planning Commission on July 11, 2007. The existing residence and accessory structures will be demolished. The maximum height of the proposed building will not exceed the 26 -foot height limit. The maximum impervious coverage will not exceed the allowable 35% of the net site area. The lot size is approximately 45,784 square feet, and the site is located in the R -1- 40,000 zoning district. Design Review approval is required pursuant to Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.060.. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the modification to the previously approve design review application by adopting the attached resolution. Staff is. not recommending any permanent conditions of approval for this project. • is Tk Application No. MOD 08 -0001; 15211 Bellecourt Dr. PROJECT DATA ZONING: R -1- 40,000. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: VLDR (Very Low Density Residential) MEASURE G: Not applicable. PARCEL SIZE: Approximately 45,784 gross and net square feet AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: Approximately 5.9 %. GRADING REQUIRED: No additional grading is required for the modification however, approximately 101 cubic yards of fill and approximately 841 cubic yards of cut plus approximately 1,382 cubic yards of basement excavation were approved for the residence. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed single - family residence is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 (c) New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. This exemption allows for the construction or conversion • of up to three single - family dwellings. PROPOSED EXTERIOR MATERIALS AND COLORS The proposed colors include beige stucco walls painted in Kelly Moore's "Spanish Sand ", with windows in Anderson's "Sandtone ", and gutters and trim in white. Materials include ledgestone veneer wainscoting, and a slate -type roof in a gray -green palette. A color and material board will be available at the public hearing. • Application No. MOD 08 -0001; 15211 Bellecourt Dr. PROJECT DATA PROJECT DISCUSSION • The applicant is requesting approval for a modification to a previously approved design review to add 110 square feet to the 6,008 square foot two -story residence. The addition. includes 92 square feet to the first floor affecting the kitchen and living room, and 18 feet to the garage. The existing residence, accessory structures and pool will all be demolished. A sport court is proposed at the rear of the parcel. Overall 137 square feet of impervious coverage has been eliminated from the previously approved plan. Correspondence and Neighbor Review Staff has received letters of support from three neighbors. They have been attached for reference. S Proposal Code Requirements Site Coverage Residence 4,505 sq. ft. Maximum Allowable: 35% _ Driveway/Walks 4,456 sq. ft. 16,024.40 sq. ft. max. Sport Court 4,255 sq. ft. Patio/Porches 2,404 TOTAL 15,620 sq. ft. 34.42% Floor Area First Floor 3,011 + 92 sq. ft. Second Floor 2,115 sq. ft. Garage 882 + 18 sq. ft. TOTAL 6,118 sq. ft. 6,120 sq. ft. (Basement) (2,267 sq. ft.) Setbacks First - Second First - Second Front yard 56.2 ft — 66.8 ft, 30 ft. — 30 ft. Rear Yard 175.3 ft. — 175.3 ft. 50 ft. — 60 ft. Right Side 22.0 ft. — 26.8 ft. 20 ft. — 25 ft. Left Side 38.4 ft. — 63.0 ft. 20 ft.- 25 ft. Height in feet Lowest elevation 205.3 Maximum height = 232.8 ft. Highest elevation 208.3 elevation (26 ft.) Average Elevation . 206.8 Topmost elevation 232.8 Maximum height' 26.0 PROJECT DISCUSSION • The applicant is requesting approval for a modification to a previously approved design review to add 110 square feet to the 6,008 square foot two -story residence. The addition. includes 92 square feet to the first floor affecting the kitchen and living room, and 18 feet to the garage. The existing residence, accessory structures and pool will all be demolished. A sport court is proposed at the rear of the parcel. Overall 137 square feet of impervious coverage has been eliminated from the previously approved plan. Correspondence and Neighbor Review Staff has received letters of support from three neighbors. They have been attached for reference. S Application No. MOD 08 -0001; 15211 Bellecourt Dr. GeotechnicaUGrading No further geotechnical review or grading will be required for this addition. Arborist Review The City Arborist determined that the modification would pose no further impacts to ordinance - protected trees. GENERAL PLAN FINDINGS The proposed project is consistent with the following General Plan Policies: Conservation Element Policy 6.0 - Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. The proposed modifications will not create a significant visual impact to the rural atmosphere of Saratoga. Many mature trees will be retained as part of the project and will help screen the residence and sport court from neighboring properties and the street. The home will be earth tone in color and will be well accentuated with architectural features such as the proposed stone veneer on the front fagade. Land Use Element Policy 5.0 -The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the Findings required for Design Approval. The home is well designed with detailed architectural features. Design Review Findings The proposed project is consistent with all the following Design Review findings stated in City Code Section 15- 45.080: a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The proposed project as modified meets this finding in that much of the existing screening (mature trees along the sides of the parcel) will be retained as part of this project. The proposed home will be in a similar location as the existing home. The home is situated with substantial setbacks and consideration is given to the neighbor's views and privacy through window placement, and tree preservation. b) Preserve Natural Landscape. Minimal grading and topographical changes are proposed for this project as modified and the majority of trees on the site will remain. All preserved trees will be protected with fencing during the construction process. c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. The proposed project as modified is consistent with this finding in that no Heritage trees and no additional native trees will be removed to accommodate the modification and all of the recommendations of the Arborist report have been made conditions of project approval to ensure a high degree of survival for all of the trees retained on site. These trees will be protected during the construction process with tree fencing and Application No. MOD 08 -0001; 15211 Bellecourt Dr. the applicant will be required to post a tree bond prior to issuance. of City permits, to ensure that no damage occurs to the protected trees. d) Minimize the perception of excessive bulk. The proposed project as modified conforms to the maximum height requirement and the architectural massing and style of the home will reduce the overall appearance of bulk. Additionally decorative elements, materials and a varied roofline will create interest and add detail to the facades. e) Compatible bulk and height. The proposed project as modified is compatible in terms of size and height to other homes in the neighborhood. The proposed home will be constructed of high quality materials and will be in keeping with other two -story homes in the surrounding neighborhood. f) Current grading and erosion control methods. The proposed project as modified would conform. to' the City's current grading and erosion control methods. The applicant is required to maintain stormwater on site where feasible. g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project as modified conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above. The project has taken energy efficiency into account, without sacrificing the neighbor's privacy, by placing the primary living spaces and windows on the west side of the home and the garage on the north side of the home. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Modification of Design Review application MOD 08 -0001 with conditions by adopting the attached resolution. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution of Approval — Modification to a previously approved Design Review 2. Neighbor support letters 3. Correspondence 4. City of Saratoga Notice, Noticing Affidavit, and Noticing Labels 5. Previously approved elevations 6. .Applicant's Plans, Exhibit "A" • � ATTACHMENT 1 • Application No. MOD 08 -0001; 15211 Bellecourt Dr RESOLUTION NO. Application No. 07 -160 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Labio; 15211 Bellecourt Dr. Approval of a modification to add 110 sq. ft. to an approved two -story home with attached garage and basement. This resolution supersedes Resolution 07 -058 for application 07 -160 WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received, an application for Modification of Design Review Approval to construct a new 6,118 sq. ft. residence. The new residence will be not more that 26 ft. in height. and will be situated on a 45,784 sq. ft. lot located at 15211 Bellecourt Drive, which is located in the R -1- 40,000 district; and . WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, the project, which proposes construction of a new single- family residence is Categorically exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303(c) New Construction or Conversion of Small . Structures. This exemption allows for construction of a single family home in an urban area; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for design review approval, and the following findings specified in Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.080 and the City's Residential Design Handbook have been determined: NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: a) Avoid unreasonable interference with .views and privacy. The proposed project as modified meets this finding in that much of the existing screening (mature trees along the sides of the parcel) will be retained as part of this project. The proposed home will be. in a similar location as the existing home. The home is situated with substantial setbacks and consideration is given to, the neighbor's views and privacy through, window placement, and tree preservation. This finding can be made in -the affirmative. b) ... Preserve Natural Landscape. Minimal grading and topographical changes are proposed for this project as modified and the majority of trees on the site will remain. All preserved trees will be protected with fencing during the construction process. This finding can be made in the affirmative. Application No. MOD 08 -0001; 15211 Bellecourt Dr. c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. The proposed project as modified is consistent with this finding in that no Heritage trees and no additional native trees will be removed to accommodate the modification and all of the recommendations of the Arborist report have been made conditions of project approval to ensure a high degree of survival for all of the trees retained on site. These trees will be protected during the construction process with tree fencing and the applicant will be required to post a tree bond prior to issuance of City permits, to ensure that no damage occurs to the protected trees. d) Minimize the perception of excessive bulb The proposed project as modified conforms to the maximum height requirement and the architectural massing and style of the home will reduce the overall appearance of bulk. Additionally decorative elements, materials and a varied roofline will create interest and add detail to the fagades. This finding can be made in the affirmative. e) Compatible bulk and height. The proposed project as modified is compatible in terms of size and height to other homes in the neighborhood. The proposed home will be constructed of high quality materials and will be in keeping with other two -story homes in the surrounding neighborhood. f) Current grading and erosion control methods. The proposed project as modified would conform to the City's current grading and erosion control methods. The applicant is required to maintain stormwater on site where feasible and this finding can be made in the affirmative. g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project as modified conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above. The project has taken energy efficiency into account, without sacrificing the neighbor's privacy, by placing the primary living spaces and windows on the west side of the home and the garage on the north side of the home. This finding can be made in the affirmative. Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, application number MOD 08 -0001 for Modification of Design Review Approval is hereby granted, and supersedes approval of Resolution 07 -058 for application number 07 -160, subject to the following conditions: PERMANENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL There are no permanent conditions of approval for this project. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. The proposed home shall be located and constructed as shown on "Exhibit A" (incorporated by reference, date stamped December 10, 2007) and in compliance with the conditions stated in this Resolution. Application No. MOD 08 -0001; 15211 Bellecourt Dr. 2. Any proposed changes - including but not limited to faeade design and materials — to the approved plans shall be submitted in writing with a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. No downgrading in the exterior appearance of the approved residence will be approved by staff.'Downgrades may include but are not limited to garage doors, architectural detailing, stonework, columns, shutters, driveway materials, etc. Proposed changes to the approved plans are subject to the approval of the Community Development Director and may require review by the Planning Commission. 3. The project shall use materials and colors as illustrated on the Finish Materials Board, dated stamped June 8, 2007. 4. Four sets of complete construction plans incorporating this Resolution. and the Arborist Reports. (see Arborist item below), as a separate plan page shall be submitted to the Building Division. 5. Two final sets of landscape plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director and the City Arborist incorporating all recommendations from the Arborist's reports dated June 27, 2007, June 11, 2007, March 28, 2007, and December 22, 2006 prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. The proposed sports court shall be redesigned to meet the conditions of the City Arborist and to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. If a redesign is not possible the applicant may make an application to the Planning Commission for approval of a sports court. 7. Front yard landscaping shall be installed prior to final occupancy inspection. 8. Final landscape, irrigation and utility plans shall be incorporated into the construction plan set and shall take into account the following requirements: • Landscape plan shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff, promote surface infiltration and minimize use of fertilizers and pesticides that can contribute to water pollution. • Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. • Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. • Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. Application No. MOD 08 -0001; 15211 Bellecourt Dr. • Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. • A note shall be included on the site plan stating that no construction equipment or private vehicles shall park or be stored within the dripline of any ordinance protected trees on the site. 9. A fencing plan shall be submitted and approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a building permit. Proposed fencing shall consist of a wood good neighbor fence. 10. A maximum of one wood - burning fireplace per residential structure may be installed. All other fireplaces shall be gas -fired fireplaces (natural or proposed) with gas jets, direct venting, convection chambers, heat exchanger, variable heat output, and flame control, and permanently affixed artificial. logs. 11. The site plan shall contain a note with the following language: "Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the LLS of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per the approved plans." 12. A stormwater retention plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval indicating how all storm water will be retained on -site, and .incorporating the New Development and Construction — Best Management Practices. 13. Water and/or runoff from the project site shall not be directed toward the adjacent properties. 14. All processing fees, in the form of deposit accounts on file with the Community Development Department, shall be. reconciled with a minimum of $500 surplus balance at all times. In the event that the balance is less than $500, all staff work on the project shall cease until the balance is restored to a minimum of $500. G C i / B - 1. All recommendations of the Arborist Reports dated June 27, 2007, June 11, 2007, March 28, 2007, and December 22, 2006, and incorporated herein by this reference shall be followed and incorporated into the plans. 2. Tree protective measures, as specified by the City Arborist, shall be installed and inspected by Staff prior to issuance of City Permits. 3. A cash payment shall be made to the City's Tree Fund in the amount of $89,190 equal to the value of removed trees that will not be replaced on site. This amount shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Prior to issuance of Building Permits the applicant shall obtain a tree bond, or similar funding mechanism as approved by the Community Development Director, in the amount of $73,750.00 to guarantee the maintenance and preservation of trees. Application No. MOD 08 -0001; 15211 Bellecourt Dr. 5. The City Arborist shall inspect the site to verify compliance with tree protective measures. The bond shall be released after the planting of required replacement trees, a favorable site inspection by the City Arborist, and payment of any outstanding Arborist fees. PUBLIC WORKS .1. The Project Geotechnical Consultant shall review and approve all geotechnical aspects of the final development plans (i.e., site preparation and grading, site drainage improvements and design parameters for foundations) to ensure that the plans, specifications and details accurately reflect the consultants' recommendations. The consultant shall discuss the benefits and liabilities associated with proposed "bubble up" drainage discharge. The results of the plan review shall be, summarized by the Project Geotechnical Consultant in a letter and submitted to the City Engineer for review prior to issuance of permits for project construction. 2. The Project. Geotechnical Engineer shall inspect, test (as needed), and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project construction. The inspections shall include, but not necessarily be limited to: site preparation and grading, site . surface and subsurface drainage improvements, and basement excavation, and foundation construction, prior to placement of fill, steel and .concrete. The results of these inspections and the as -built conditions of the project shall be described by the Project 'Geotechnical Engineer in a letter(s) and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to Final Project Approval. 3. The owner (applicant) shall pay any outstanding fees associated with the City Geotechnical Consultant's review of the project prior to Zone Clearance. FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Santa Clara County Fire Department. CITY ATTORNEY. 1. Owner and Applicant shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its employees, agents, independent contractors and volunteers (collectively "City") from any and all costs and expenses, including but not limited to attorney's fees incurred by the City or held to be the liability, of City in connection with City's defense in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project or contesting any action or inaction in the City's processing and/or approval of the subject application. Application No. MOD 08 -0001; 15211 Bellecourt Dr. Section 2. Construction must be commenced within 36 months or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15 -90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 13th day of February 2008 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Joyce Hlava, Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: John F. Livingstone, AICP, Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner Date ATTACHMENT 2 • l� u an.17, 2008 12:46PM Date: January 11, 2008 To the Planning Department of City of Saratoga, k 03?5 P. 3 We hereby approve the owner changes made to the project plans of application # 510 -03- 012 (15211 Bellecourt) to add square footage primarily to the kitchen, living room, and dirty kitchen. The owner changes we reviewed were made on 10/29/2007 and made the following changes. + I" floor +92 sq ft o Kitchen and Living Room +60 sq ft o Hallway +22 sq ft o Dirty Kitchen +10 sq ft • Basement +17 sq ft • Garage x-18 sq ft + .Covered patio +10 sq ft + Rear.Patio +54 sq ft • Driveway— 56 sq ft Neighbor Name: Craig and Susie Nicholson Neighbor Address 15235 Bellecourt, Saratoga; CA Signature: -° • En, 17, '2008 12 :46PM Vo, 0O75 P. � Date: January 4,:2008 To the planning Department of City of Saratoga: We hereby approve the owner changes made to the project plans of application 4 510 -03- 012 (15211 Bellecourt) to add square footage primarily to the kitchen, living room, and dirty kitchen. The owner changes we reviewed were made on 10/29/2007 and made the following changes. • I" floor +92 sq tI o T,itchen and Living Room +60 sq ft o Hallway +22 sq ft o Ditty 'Kitchen +l0 sq ft • Basement +17 sq ft • Garage +18 sq ft • Covered Patio +10 sq ft + hear patio +54 sq ft • Driveway — 56 sq ft Neighbor Name; Helmut and Ursula Moessner Neighbor A s: 15200 Pepper Lane, Saratoga, CA Signature: �En. 17. 2008 12:46PM k 0310 P. 2 Date: January 11, 2008 Planning D To the P g artme ep rrt of City of Saratoga We hereby approve the owner changes made to the project plans of application # 510 -03- 012 (15211 Bellecourt) to add square footage primarily to the kitchen, living room, and dirty kitchen. The owner changes we reviewed were made on 10/29/2007 and made the following changes. • Is` floor +92 sq ft o Kitchen and Living Room +60 sq ft o Hallway +22 sq ft o Dirty Kitchen +10 sq ft • Basement +17 sq ft • Garage +18 sq ft • Covered Patio +10 sq ft • Rear Patio +54 sq ft • Driveway — 56 sq ft Neighbor Name: Mn and Mrs. Oscar Bakhtiari Neighbor Addr B lXee u% axato a, CA Signature: C7 • ATTACHMENT 3 � • Date: January 11, 2008 To the Planning Department of City of Saratoga: We made minor modifications to add space to the main kitchen (40 sq. ft.), dirty kitchen (10 sq. ft.), and living room (20 sq. ft.). The changes to the basement, garage, patio and driveway all stem from the changes to the kitchen and living room. Our three closest neighbors have reviewed and approved of the changes. This group of neighbors includes Oscar Bakhtiari, whose house is closest to our kitchen and living room. We are of course abiding by all constraints such as maximum impervious coverage and minimum setbacks. Sincerely, Wilburt-Juan Labio and Lena Sun Owners of 15211 Bellecourt • 1�1 HMENT 4 . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, Abby A e� nde, being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the 22 "d day of January , 2007, that I deposited 44 notices in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to- wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15- 45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property described as: Address: 15211 Bellecourt Drive APN: 510 -03 -012 that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above Abby Ayende • City of Saratoga Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 408- 868 -1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Saratoga's Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Wednesday, the 13`h day of February 2008, at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall theater located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. The public hearing agenda item is stated below. Details of this item. are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. Please consult the City.website at www.saratoga.ca.us regarding Friday office closures. APPLICATION /ADDRESS: #MOD08 -0001 -15211 Bellecourt Drive APPLICANT: Labio APN: 510 -03 -012 : PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests a Modification to a previously approved Design Review application. The .modification is for a 116 square foot addition to a 6,008 square foot house approved by the Planning Commission on July 11, 2007. The proposal includes demolition of the existing 2,364 sq. ft. residence. The maximum proposed impervious coverage is 35% of the site. The maximum height of the proposed buildings is 26 feet. The lot size is 45,784 square feet, and the site. is zoned Rl- 40,000. A site visit will be held on the day preceding the hearing . date listed above as part of the standard Site Visit Committee agenda. Site visits occur between 3:30 and 5:00 p.m. The site visit is open to the public. The Site Visit Committee will convene at the City Hall parking lot at 3:30 p.m. on the day preceding the hearing and visit the site listed above and may visit other sites as well For more information please contact the Community . Development Department at 408 868 -1222 or review the Site Visit Agenda on. the City Website at www.sarato ag ca.us. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a Public Hearing in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing. In order for information to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed on or before Monday February 4, 2008. This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor's office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out -of —date information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all residents; potentially affected by a. project. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Heather Bradley Contract Planner (408) 868 -1232 annary 22, 2008 Olonership Listing . 'repared for: 10 -03 -012 ,ABIO FAMILY TRUST 5211 BELLECOURT DRIVE ; ARATOGA CA 95070 97 -19 -004 VILLIAM T TSENG )R CURRENT OWNER 9751 GLEN BRAE DR , ARATOGA CA 95070 -5015 97 -19 -014 iIOVANNI S & REYES BRIGNOLO )R CURRENT OWNER 9645 SARATOGA LOS GATOS RD , ARATOGA CA 95070 -6436 97 -19 -017 'ICTOR E &.MAXINE TINSLEY )R CURRENT OWNER 9699 SARATOGA LOS GATOS RD AjWGA CA 95070 -6436 97 -19 -036 'ONY YU )R CURRENT OWNER 5159 ALONDRA LN ARATOGA CA 95070 -6446 10 -01 -032 ;RIC & LISA WARMENHOVEN )R CURRENT OWNER 9852 PARK DR ARATOGA CA 95070 -6444 10 -01 -035 PA B & REGINA OLDHAM )R CURRENT OWNER 9861 ROBIN WAY ARATOGA CA 95070 -6428 10 -03 -001 ANNIE WU )R CURRENT OWNER 5310 PEPPER LN ARATOGA CA 95070 -6427 1 04 .OT & JULIANNE MICHAELS )R CURRENT OWNER 5230 PEPPER LN ARATOGA CA 95070 -6461 397 -19 -005 MIKE G & CINDY LEONARDI 21423 SARATOGA HILLS RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5377 397 -19 -015 JOHN & LILI DILLON OR CURRENT OWNER 19661 SARATOGA LOS GATOS RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6436 397 -19 -018 RONALD D & PATRICIA INMAN OR CURRENT OWNER 19711 SARATOGA LOS GATOS RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6436 510 -01 -025 JEAN C KLEIN OR CURRENT OWNER 15121 PEPPER LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -6423 510 -01 -033 MYRA REINHARD OR CURRENT OWNER 15185 PEPPER IN SARATOGA CA 95070 -6424 510 -02 -008 BYRON J & LYNDA ANDERSON OR CURRENT OWNER 15281 PEPPER LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -6425 510 -03 -002 CHARLES & BARBARA BOCKS OR CURRENT OWNER 15290 PEPPER LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -6461 510 -03 -005 HELMUT A & URSULA MOESSNER OR CURRENT OWNER 15200 PEPPER IN SARATOGA CA 95070 -6461 397 -19 -013 YOUNG H & KYUNGJA AHN OR CURRENT OWNER 19615 SARATOGA LOS GATOS RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6436 397 -19 -016 SIDNEY T & MARCIA KAUFMANN OR CURRENT OWNER 19677 SARATOGA LOS GATOS RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6436 397 -19 -028. GARY P & DANA KENNEDY OR CURRENT OWNER 15155 ALONDRA LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -6446 510 -01 -026 JAMES A PARDEN OR CURRENT OWNER 15141 PEPPER LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -6423 510 -01 -034 DOUGLAS & MICHELE HELMUTH OR CURRENT OWNER 19831 ROBIN WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -6428 510 -02 -009 RICHARD E BOCKS PO BOX 2130 SUNNYVALE CA 94087 -0130 510 -03 -003 JAMES B & GAIL BARTON OR CURRENT OWNER 15260 PEPPER IN SARATOGA CA 95070 -6461 510 -03 -006 RICHARD D VIERRA OR CURRENT OWNER 15180 PEPPER IN SARATOGA CA 95070 -6450 10 -03 -007 510 -03 -008 )AVID M & AMY. WILLIAMS JAMES W & PAMELA FRANKOLA )R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 5160 PEPPER LN 15140 PEPPER LN ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -6450 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6450 10 -03 -011 510 -03 -012 )SCAR & SORAIA BAKHTIARI LABIO FAMILY TRUST )R CURRENT OWNER 19721 PARKVIEW CT 5181 BELLECOURT AVE CUPERTINO CA 95014 -0621 ; ARATOGA CA 95070 -6406 10 -03 -014 ,OBERT MAXFIELD 2930 SARATOGA AVE B3 �ARATOGA CA 95070 -4661 10 -03 -019 .ASAN TEYMOURI )R CURRENT OWNER 9730 SARATOGA LOS GATOS RD ARATOGA CA 95070 -6449 10 -05 -003 ;HARLES F & HEATHER GOODMAN )R CURRENT OWNER 5256 BELLECOURT AVE ARATOGA CA 95070 -6407 10 -05 -029 UDY & KENNETH HUI )R CURRENT OWNER 9634 SARATOGA LOS GATOS RD ARATOGA CA 95070 -6437 ,vaned Listing Services .0. Box 2593 >ana Point CA 92624 510 -03 -015 RICHARD G WHITE OR CURRENT OWNER 15285 BELLECOURT AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -6406 510 -05 -001 DMITRIY N & TANYA VASILEV OR CURRENT OWNER 15310 BELLECOURT AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -6407 510 -05 -004 DAVID D & JENNIFER YANG OR CURRENT OWNER 15234 BELLECOURT AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -6407 510 -05 -030 NIX FAMILY OR CURRENT OWNER. 19600 SARATOGA LOS GATOS RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6437 510 -03 =009 JAMES & ELEANOR PERAZZO PO BOX 2222 SARATOGA CA 95070 -0222 510 -03 -013 CRAIG & SUSIE NICHOLSON. OR CURRENT OWNER 15235 BELLECOURT AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -6406 510 -03 -016 FRIEDA MCKENZIE OR CURRENT OWNER 15311 BELLECOURT AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -6466 510 -05 -002 JAMES A & SONJA PEDICINI OR CURRENT OWNER 15280 BELLECOURT AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -6407 510 =05 -005 CHYI -RONG & TZUU -CHYI JENG OR CURRENT OWNER 15214 BELLECOURT AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -6407 City of Saratoga Attn: HEATHER BRADLEY 13777 Fruitvale Ave Saratoga CA 95070 u • � ATTACHMENT 5 • • N R;" P- EX GRADE - - to --- s 051 _7 NEW GRAVE - ------------ ----------------------------------------------- v _1\ l -' - -I I ---- --- L im st a-mitwff -- ---- -- --- --L---------- - --it ------------ I --------------- it 7 _L ------------- fRONT ELEVATION. EAST Irvin aloe- rmun ®numlmue at rI1111.111Ii 'a ififfiffiffifflow - MIUMIgImp, a loll _11-111M M tilfflfflfflpl IMPHYRINNIFfle"i M w 6 i i i O 1 ------------ zw ------ - C6-.. Ice* ­/ERAG= C-- EAST cc�:) 733 a' ELEV.;-,710N N07EE7 i > COAI lio. I"JCK "tOCC'o OVER DARE MASH On t_A� P" C' OftA" 'P' BLDG PAPER 7 C,(.w- :�ClF yr M'M 111-1 ft CLASS 'A' PA#01;t%' t*,704. 0 W, PLC AT Pb;'-* TO WALL I" C."t OTC*V. WOC�M bULL wrloo w";4M. oicts �W."- t. ArrftNV) WkAP9K AWWOTOR 10. 01, C"I"W01 CAP 11 24' W., *R*t,r-CT". &Cy-LItaw I COLOR a _R]41! SPECIFICATION: tw�TE� ROCt COW- FLAT 710E ROOF 11 A".t C.VAY 6TUCC. 'Kr.LLI MOORE•, TORTILLA, M4n9 -I wff-c W --41TWEM, b7cm vp.r.- -r r,--V"DO STO4E•, %-"TA4-CLMAIN LEDdL 14-tt -1 MOORl5', " ACOUSTIC WHITE Lt:,',', THAN 3.5 1? 0 MEAMMEASSOC., INC. 12201 Sarallop•Sunnyvale, Rti Suite D Saratoga, CA 95070 Tel:(409)996-1744 Fax: (408)996-1742 Tb&moftbmpLmandqxdfi­6 "Ibeastriaidtodw spwificsiwfbrwbichdwy was , =d publicat6m tilzi-f "I be awe * li-imd I. each me. Ill Ieptodtaomt or Title, = -dW--&W—teltW­-dhM—A—_IWJ djout pmju6m Visa l eatliliiclt with ditise p1m and wMilimum w" wne8ade ptitm N. 'Ideim of the —.P- .fd. lewtio Client. Mr. & Mrs. Labio 19721 P&dMew Court Cupertim. CA 95014 P.j..t New Two Story House 15211 BeHecourt Dr. Smstoga, CA 95070 Client Revisions N.. D--P— Dft I 06MGM 2 MIMI$ 1 0&27/06 4 07106006 1 07fam 6 08110/06 7 05,0501 to AVERAGE=OF 11 NATURAL GRADES A%M*AdC OF NATURAL GRADES MI.9T L2195 i& 12 City Revisions P7 —N—_ �P_ Date I 2 ELEV.;-,710N N07EE7 i > COAI lio. I"JCK "tOCC'o OVER DARE MASH On t_A� P" C' OftA" 'P' BLDG PAPER 7 C,(.w- :�ClF yr M'M 111-1 ft CLASS 'A' PA#01;t%' t*,704. 0 W, PLC AT Pb;'-* TO WALL I" C."t OTC*V. WOC�M bULL wrloo w";4M. oicts �W."- t. ArrftNV) WkAP9K AWWOTOR 10. 01, C"I"W01 CAP 11 24' W., *R*t,r-CT". &Cy-LItaw I COLOR a _R]41! SPECIFICATION: tw�TE� ROCt COW- FLAT 710E ROOF 11 A".t C.VAY 6TUCC. 'Kr.LLI MOORE•, TORTILLA, M4n9 -I wff-c W --41TWEM, b7cm vp.r.- -r r,--V"DO STO4E•, %-"TA4-CLMAIN LEDdL 14-tt -1 MOORl5', " ACOUSTIC WHITE Lt:,',', THAN 3.5 1? 0 MEAMMEASSOC., INC. 12201 Sarallop•Sunnyvale, Rti Suite D Saratoga, CA 95070 Tel:(409)996-1744 Fax: (408)996-1742 Tb&moftbmpLmandqxdfi­6 "Ibeastriaidtodw spwificsiwfbrwbichdwy was , =d publicat6m tilzi-f "I be awe * li-imd I. each me. Ill Ieptodtaomt or Title, = -dW--&W—teltW­-dhM—A—_IWJ djout pmju6m Visa l eatliliiclt with ditise p1m and wMilimum w" wne8ade ptitm N. 'Ideim of the —.P- .fd. lewtio Client. Mr. & Mrs. Labio 19721 P&dMew Court Cupertim. CA 95014 P.j..t New Two Story House 15211 BeHecourt Dr. Smstoga, CA 95070 Client Revisions N.. D--P— Dft I 06MGM 2 MIMI$ 1 0&27/06 4 07106006 1 07fam 6 08110/06 7 05,0501 to 11 12 City Revisions P7 —N—_ �P_ Date I Ft­g ro_ i ..QW 7 PI.-i" Came 05105/07 3 _ 4 7 01111M .S..k 3116'-I'-• IN— h'! NN Cbed'd DT: RN N W n I ifle: Exterior Elevations A-7 --- -------- �1111111111111T­MW;7-03-_M J.b. %11-- • '12, 2'l 2W 2091---- Me, 205'T=== • ttIBIHI Bill [aim Bill no- ----------------- TIMM, 3 Pill, PIP, I'm 9 7 M :0 ........ . . 7 7. Z­_ _77 20681' AVERAGE OF ------------------------------ ---------------------- - --------------- ITURAL QR,�DES I L - - - 4 Lo L_ J I NM owAM WE5T - - - - - - E D L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------- - ................... I 1 L­ ___j 0, U MORTM REAR ELEVATION SOUTH WEST EAST ELUV,4TION NOTES: 1, ; CL AI Ido* ljlA:R PJUC;4:0 OVER WIRE f9494 Q/2 LlYr- u Mft&DIr -W M_DG I-AFIOR' C414CRrYU ILA? TI;,e PW) CLAW A D. FAP,!Mrl (WrTllt. 4. PTUCCO : . Ch V KAA,�% Af Pb-�� 1 0 WALL V C"I OIC-W arND+AU FILL uxX W im4XV O OTCPAt, YIIIW a A"7-POW PO WAei AP"qk*IOFR to o" Cs~,N CA► 11 24' ^ 40' MC)4 VCWLFCTIVC Wr-LIGHT GO O d MATERIAL SPECIFICATION: P�" IAT""4. CfX.. PLAT TILE Pr tA".t VCL AIR 4 'r O�A,r f"WXN 6TUI-44,; -KI LL Y MOORE', TORTTLLA 10141719 -1 urpit> W WaIEW511N., WAPTONE I b7ce vF. +itr. Vt-DrA-IDO OTCNE-, 04ASTA-MMWAIN LEDGE tw i _Kr, 1 MOORE, 46 A") TIC UNITE _OS "-JFZAL Gw:DEE - ,.TRADE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . bbl RIGHT "=Lr=\/A71ON NORTH MEMAMEASSOC, INC. 12201 Saratoga - Sunnyvale Rd. Suite D Saratoga, CA 95070 Tel: (408) 996-1744 Fax: (408) 996-1742 The use ofthm pLm and spedf-docs shall be muktad w dm q=& aw for which they _F I .- Whl,,atoa thecof shall be p�aly Iftamed w-h - R— V.&Kd- or pbfi--doo by m mhot i. whole . m put. ir pubibited. Tide Mcizark Assoc, b.1 plain aed .fft -momom Oce. Mr. & Mrs. Labio 19721 PadMew Coo Cupertino, CA 95014 New Two Story House 15211 Beflecow Dr. Saratoga, CA 95070 RN Exterior Elevations A-8 Client Revisions J,;, PI!,. il, -­! M 07 W, 0-.ipfi- D_ 1 MOM 0&19106 06W/06 4 07106M 1 0726106 6 06110106 05(05107 9 It 12 City Revisions N.. D-hpd- D_ I PW .,C mmmlt OVIOM7 P.t s C­ 051" 1­ 04119106 nc.k 3116-l'-O' lk.- 11, NN RN Exterior Elevations A-8 J,;, PI!,. il, -­! M 07 inn: BeOecom • � ATTACHMENT 6 • Il `1 it • 12 r 01 4 N E ^^7 — —� - 5 7 0 " �40�S I 1- I I I I MMEM"EASSOC., LJ�Ja) ® � I 12201 Saretoga- Sunnyvale Rd. Suite D . S=0j;a. CA 93070. Te'(409)996 1744 Ft¢: (408) 9961742 15211 5ELLE000RT I:�R., 5- ARA70 &A � ., I1 f� •' ' , � � � ' f fF tt Y� ,n k Y �'" � � w J � 252 ;�`aeu' � K; - - wift -dm U& aal.pec firmm"amdpklwd %.C" epwi6" dm>Lr w6i"h 9,eY wne p:cymcd and potbllatlm,lwwr ,h"0 bemrytentr limCadm ao�me. Rmae,,gaododion oc pa61mCO" by�meth"d, m wL"le orm puf, u pm8il.,ik4. 158e mlLe plain sod �ed0omaa"a®em"vlm MmuieAboa.lac.) sp.,fi mithwrtpry'aNaa Y,nnl"ooLR wilh&w phm and Hof �autlt�pios 8de erWm"e often aecapmca lY Mr. W n. Labio 19721 Parkview Court CWatum, CA 93014 New Two Story House 15211 Bellmourt Dr. Satetnga, CA 95070 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ❑ PRELIMINARY DE516N REVIEW SUBMITTAL. ❑ BUILDING DEPARTMENT ❑ PLAN GHEGK SUBMITTAL ❑ AP I D FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) Client ow 5 HEE7 I NOEX GONSUL7AN75 PROJECT 1;�ATA ti x,. `°° DW e I 2 mi9106 A -00 COVER SHEET A -0 GENRAL NOTES A -01 AR80RI8T REPORT A -02 ARBORIST REPORT A -03 AMORIST REPORT L -I LANDSCAPE PLAN T -1 BOUNDARY 4 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY MAP C -1 GbVl =F2 SHEET G -2 CGNCEFTt1AL GRADING t DRAINAraE PLAN A -I AREA CALCULATIONS A -2 EXISTING 4 DEMO. SITE PLAN A -9 NEW SITE PLAN A -4 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN A -5 FIRST FLOOR PLAN A -6 SECOND FLOOR PLAN A -1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS I- OU44ER MR 4 ItilaB. LABIO TEL. (409) 864 -4819 19121 RTWO, CA 9511( FAX ) CA �� 2- ARCHITECTURAL MEMARIE ASSOC, INC. TEL. (4091996 -TI44 roGA- 9UYVALE rm. FAX (40917J6 -n47 SU% NN 6A,RATOCK CA 96010 3- CIVIL E ANN SMP ENGNEER6 TEL: (650) 941 -e085 1534 GAROD LANE FAX, (680) 941 -9185 408 ALTOS, CA. 94=4 4- SOL EW.DeER F ccm%LT04G. W- TEL. (409) 661 -6321 P.O. BOX 0536 FAX (409) 561 -2328 8AR4TgAi CA 98011 5- LANDSCAPE H6 ICa BAABM WJAY � (409) 661 -6988 9ARATOGA, CA 95010 A.PN.: ZONING, LOT SIZE: ALLOWACLE FLOOR AREA TYPE OF OCCUPANCY, TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION., MAXIMUM BUILDING "EIGHT. FIRE SPRINKLER. AGE OF STRUCTURE: EXISTING HOUSE TO BE DEMOLISHED: NEW HOUSE AREA, FIRST FLOOR : SECOND FLOOR: 510-03 -012 R -1- 40000 45,184 SQ. FT. 6,120 SQ. FT. R3 -1,1I y -N 261-0" FT ENTIRE STR1dCTURE 40 YEARS 2,964 9Q. FT. 3,103 SQ. FT. --. —. � aJEEM CMI FRONT FIRST FLOOR: FRDNT.BECONp FLOOR � REAR FIRST FLOOR REAR SECOND FLOOR: RIGHT SIDE FIRST FLOOR: RIGHT SIDE SECOND FLOOR: LEFT SIDE FIRST FLOOR: LEFT SIDE SECOND FLOOR: �' PROVIDED mums= 56'-2" 30' -0" 661-10" 30' 41" 115' -4" 50' -0" I,5' -4" 60' -0" 2Z' -0" 20' -0" 38' -5" 20' -0" 69' -1" 25' -0" 2 0&17106 4 o7,aaos 3 o7rmDs a odlaoa 7 6sa m a 18asM 9 10 12 City Revisions 1>..ipdm Dam I roc` ®� 021150_ 2 c a 0— ow"vChaoya tUr�Ni IWBM7 TOTAL LIVING AREA : ? 4 A -8 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A -9 BUILDING SECTIONS A -10 Bl11LDIN6 SECTIONS A -11 6(llLDW5 SECTIONS A -12 BOOR PLAN GARAGE : 900 SQ FT. 'lo Ip II s TOTAL AREA : 6,118 $Q FT. BASEMENT AREA: 2 SQ F7 MAX IMPERVIOUS LOT COVERAGE, 35 X 16ID24 SQ FT. MAIN FLOOR PLAN 3,103 SQ FT. s 7 e DaW os!IVna GARAGE COVEfD FHEB DRIVEWAY 4 WALKWAY: 0 9N119 4,45 .� U yy pp�� / L�' f D,aoasr: x® LIGHT WELLS SPORT COURT REAR PATIO 502 SQ. FT. 4 PT 1,908 SQ. FT. CITY U1- ,AKAI OGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT caalmasy sh�Tma Cover IMPERVIOUS LOT COVERAGE: 15,620 sQ. Fr. 9411 x LANDSCAPE, 30,164 SQ. FT. 6599 TOTAL: 45.,84 Sa FT. 1000096 Sh at 2083Z' _ HIGHEST POINT �r6� AcaoLlr -naafi iwD6O : VZr� n 'u I CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE: CALIFOT2lJIA BUILDING CODE,: CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CO�E 2001 EDITION (2000 UFC) 2001 EDITION (199, UBC) 2001 EDITION (2000 UMC) EX VU UO D . . �`N "- {fl 1 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE' CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC CODE 2001 EDITION (2000 UPC) 2004 EDITION (2002 NEC) 20530' ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDAI✓ZD: ANY OTHER APPL [CABLE LO�AL LAWS AND REGULATIONS. 2005 EDITION STATE �O pse: r: sos"oaatw onw„auIO zam roe:Bellnoaut LOWEST POINT � M i l l a r g a� con �s a� 141, _ w r n a r g 1A O�R 19 4 r } 2 p�r r 2 - OP' 6Y - r �1 �4 t � 1 b" �Y � � a iN I o 3� aii lip X14 d 4 � 10, 111 ilia n •r ° go 'i� LS m it 111y, y I I g Q k`r _ mE a s < g sl pu oll fill 1 t Uf •.n �r ����ay,, � +�gyj a� � � e - a ig 'ba� o rr LL F K F Q� a n d d if p W. t i d a t lip r y 1� 3F . 3 91 y 3' F a I q P 1 3 C I a m 1 9 A r 0 0 1 6 r �• A 9 R Ti 9 A x A A n 9 9 1 4 4 4 4 q N• • ti e 0 • 1 �� (1��; I�1 (' ICI' (''��� / /�,\ • yes 137 %7 FALJITUALi AVENL!F; • SAEAT0 ,.4. CALIF :1;NIA OR% • 066. 868 -1200 'I! MEMBERS Imrmpm arn,lrr'.1. 1931, Amman Kgo RglefgM K9'p Much 28, 2007 .1 -rem., nzt slnn Mr. and Mrs. Wiiburt Iabio Nfm Wa1fo -ft 19721 Parkview Court Cupertino, CA 95014 RE: Permit application # 07 -160 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Labio, - I have reteivcd and reviewed the revised plea and the latter provided from Monistic Associates, Inc. and the report from Debbie Ellis. I am very glad to beer that you have decided to have her assist you on the project. Enclosed is my report for inclusion in the final set of building division plans. Please contact me at ( 408) 8661276 if you have any questions. Smccrely, Kate Bear City Arbonst 15211 Belle Court • • Trees that we approved for removal will require replecemort tress to provide screening from neighboring properties and mitigate removal of trees. Replacement values fm trees can be found at the bottom of the Tree Inventory Table. The proposed removals have a total appraised value of 5119,190. I recommend phoning sufficient new to mat the screening requirements of the property, and [sing a mix of naives and non native species. Replacement urea should equal a minimum of 530,000 in value. Excavation, trenching, grading and drainage Excavation for the house and foundation should nay a minimum of 15 fed from the trunk ofredwood #29. A proposed retaining wall around the house will impact a numberof treat: on the property. Although theft 1s a difference in grade between the level of the house and the yard, the retaining wall appears to go, right through some of the trees on the acath side of the house. This should be clarified on the final plans. Drainage around the house should be redirected to remain outside the canopies of trees. Correctly it is designed to go through locations where trees #18, 29,30 and 34 grow and is very close to use 021. R would be better to relocate the drain line closer to the house or farther from the house and closer to the well Bond Per City Ordinance 1550.080, a bond amount of 573,750, which is equal to 100% of the total appraised value the trey potentially impeded by construction, is required. This amount includes tram #1 - 7, 18, 21, 34, 43, 54, 55, 58, and 74. Appraisal values are calculated according to the Gufda for Planr Appraisal, 90 Edition, published by the In(ematiamal Society of Arboriculture (ISA), 2000. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. This report, including the attached Tice Inventory Table and map showing locations for protowve forcing, shall be incorporated into the set of final building plans. The preliminary report dated December 4 2006 does not need to be included in the feral plan set. 2. Tree protective fencing shall be established prior to my grading or the arrival of oonstruction equipment or materials on site. - it shall be comprised of aix -foot high chain link forcing moantmd on eight -foot tall, two-inch diameter galvanized posts, driven 24 inches into the ground and spaced no mare than 10 fed sport Once eetabhehed, the feccing roust remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. - 3. Owner shall provide a tree protection band in the amount of 573,750 prior to obtaining building division permits. 4. Owner shall plant replacement tree: and screening shrubs to mitigate the removal of hoes for the pmjed. A- replaceoort value of 530,000 in replacement trees and screening shrubs is recommended. Ten of the tram shill be from The following list of natives: coast live oak (Quemus agrifolia), valley oak (Quercus labafa), blue oak (Quercw douglasiam), black oak (Querma kelloggh), big leaf maple (Ater macrophyllum), California buckeye (Aesculus californica), Douglas fir (Pmeudotsuga menzierio and coed redwood (Sequoia aempervingtr). Page 3 of S • ! community toevelopm eat Department G of 1�FnavebAVailr 15211 Betiecaart Dr. Application A 07.160 ARBORIST REPORT Much 28, 2007 APN 510-03 -012 Prepared by Kate Bear, City Aswrid Own&. Labio Pbone (408) 9661276 SUMMARY - The property owner of 15211 Belle Court has submitted revised plane to the city to demolish their home and build a new single family Lome on the property. They have relocated the home approximately eight feet to the north from the previous position an the lot in order to preserve trees. Toe owns have hired Deborah Ellis, consulting erbmim. and W. Jeffiey Had. landscape arobitect to assist tham with the project and ensure protection of the retained tress. A total of 86 trees protected by City Onlbw= 15-050 weft inventoried for This project. The owners propose to remove 32 trees, including our that is an the udshbor's property. Of the 54. trees to be mw=4 the project potentially impacts tress 15 tree and a tree protection bond of 573,750 will be required. This bond mmoant may change with future design changes. The tree inventory Table for the project has been revised and tide Table should be included in the final plans for the project. A map showing fence locations is attached to this report and should be inomp raw into the final plan ad. - - INTRODUCTION A total of 86 area protected. by City Ordinance 15-WO were inventoried fartbis project. They include 14 Douglas fire (#1 -10, 12, 21,39 and 42), 2 Eucalyptus ( #20 and 71), 1 gram wattle ( #19), 1 London plane ( #37), one Monterey pine (#26),26 redwoods ( #11, 13, IS, 16, 27 - 30, 32, 3& 40, 41, 43,46, 48, 49,51,52,54-58,73,76,84), 15 Dmdar osdar (#14, 17,18, 3d, 36, 74, 75, 77- 83; gad 85),18 coast live oaks ( 425, M, 45, 47, S9 - 70, 72 and 94 5 Canary Wood pines (024.31,33.3;, and 501 and 3 cedars (#22, 23 and 53). Each tree has been marked with a numbered almaninum tag for ease of identification Data for cub inventoried tree is compiled in a revised Tree Inventory Table at the end of this report Revision, reflect changes in the plans and corrections in appraisal values of tray The revised Tree Inventory Table attached to this report should be the one included in the final ad ofbuilding plume. Plans reviewed for this report include Shed A -0, Cover Sbeat, Sheets AO-i and AO-2, Arborist Report, Sheet A2, Demolition and Existing Conditions and Shoat A3 - New Site Plan, dated February 10, 2007 by Memmie Associates, Inc. Also reviewed again were Shed TI - Topographic Survey, dated April 19, 2006, Sbems CA and C -2 - Cover Sbed end Conceptual Drainage Plan by SMP Civil Engineer, dated October 12, 2006 and Shed L-1, Landscape Concept Plan, dated February 7, 2007 by W. Jeffrey Had. C� 15211 Belle Court • , 5. Trees 458, 63 - 74 and 8l - 86 shag be surveyed mid added tothe plans. 6. Any grading or trenching under a trce's canopy shall be approved by the city ar)arlet prior to performing wort. Happmved, it shall be done Minudy using ohoveL. Any mots measuring two inches or larger shall be retained and nomeled under, roots communing leas thm two inches may be cut with a sharp pruning instrument 7. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the designated fenced area (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but am not necessarily . limited m, the following: demolition, grading, trenching equipment cleaning, stockpiling and dumping materials (including soil fill), and egoipmenNvehiele operation and parking. 8. Plans shall show locations for all utilities including electrical, drainage, water, sewer and gas Hoes. The drainage around the house shall be redirected to remain as far from trees #18, 21, 29, 30 and 34 as possible. 9.. The retaining wall around the muse shall use pier footings rather it= a continuous foundation. Holes for the footings shall be hand dug for the fast three fed ifthey m under a tree's canopy. 10. Any approved grading; or trenching beneath the trees' canopies oball be manually performed using shovels. 11. A landscape plan separate from the site plan should be submitted for review to evaluate impede to urea& 12. Design the landscape plans to show the following: s. Design irrigation an that it does not spray trunks of trees. Locate valve boxes and controllers outside of drip lima of tree canopies. b. Select plants with similar water rcguiremems to the Rees under which they will be placed. c. Design lawns to the there is mom between them and the took of any ties; confute lawn mine to the outside 20% of the area under the ties canopy. & If oaks m included in the landscape design, plant only drought wlmmt plans compatible with oaks under the outer 20% of the canopy. Do not include lawn within the drip line of any ask see an the property, I recommend placing mulch under the canopy instead of a laws e. Design topanessimgs so that since m mulch remain at least one fact from the Worths of retained trios and 6 inches from the tnudts of new trees. f. Do not allow tilling or stripping of the topsoil beneath the aegis' cancpiea, including for weed control. S. Establish bender board or other edging material proposed beamh tree canopies on top of elating oil grade (such as by using stakes). 13. Any priming of trees an site most be performed under the supervision ofen ISA Certified Arbosiat and according to MA standards. 14. Trees shall be watered every three weeks during the dry summer months or more often as accessary to ensure their continued good health. Water using a soaker hose or drip line midway Page 1 of5 Page 4 of S 15211 Belle Court • Included with the revised place is a kaer from Monistic Inc:! dated February 27, 20M responding to the preliminary wbwiet report 4 SITE OBSERVATIONS, PLAN REVIEW AND TRCHM DISCUSSION Tree survey data II Trees #58,63 - 74 and 81 - 86 have not yet Lem nuveyed included an the topographic aarveY in the reviaedphroo. This should be dour prior to submitting the he bidding division. Removals The plane should be recamellled so that the total number of posal far removal•is the same thmmgbout The letter from Memarie Associates, Inc. stat landscape j mes are proposed for reltloval, but &6. adds up to 31 or 32 (depending the cotmt of tree ro be ova' an the plan and on whhether acacia #19 is iacludeA). Trees pmpoted relude #8, 9, 19, 20,22 -25, 26, 31- 33, 35, 36,44, 45, 49 - 53, 36, 57, 59, 66, 67, 71.73!b8'1. 8 Shat A-2, the Demo Plea, does not clearly show which trow arc m be removal in that not all s have a canopy shown an the plan designating whether they will be retained or removed. For of this report I will consider that 31 trees are proposed for renval,down &am 54. Tree #19 we ndfng to the topographic survey (Sheet C -2) send they wau(d be out the neighbor's properly need to approve of its removal in writing priorto to" it dower I mccomoeod designating retained and removed trove in the seuue momm As on the landscape concept plan by drawing an •k" through Proposed removals. I }� Trees designated to be removed should be clearly mated and uded in the new site plan, the drainage plan and the grading plan so the information can be reviewed impact to trees. Nme teems ( #8, 9, 19, 20, 36, 53, $6, 57 and 71) am in poor have�poor structure or crowd trees that It would be appropriate to remove these Toe will need approval from the ��mm,cdesirable. Nme trees must be removed to construct the house and drivedpy as proposed. They include #26,31 - 33, 22 - 25 and 86.Of the Rem to be removed a large redwood (0 2) is included. The redesign enables the owners to retain tree #29, a redwood of the sere du as tree #P2 and with better structure, a second redwood Out is medium dud, and a deodar cedar tree. The house has been relocated farther than tress #29, 30 and 34 which were previously dadgmated for re mcvs�and con be retained. Removal of theme nine trees is therefore acceptable. i The sport court requites the removal of 12 trees as cmrendy d�'xgreed: They include #44, 45,48 - 53, 59, fib, 67 and 73.Oak tra #45 and redwood #73 area very nice jpeaimend and I recommend retaining at Itae one of them. The ask is outside of the court and it could relocated somewhat fardow from this tree in order to preserve it Consideration should also be given to 4 smaller, caul or reorienting or relocating it on the property. Trees #81 and 83 are also proposed for removal and could probably be� 'red with the proposed design. 11 is not clear why they are suggested to be removed. Page 2 of 5 15211 Belle Court between the trunk and the edge of the canopy. Use m d*1h of one foot deep. AtwJ.ncmx Revised Tree Inventory Table dated 3 -26-07 Map Showing Tree Locations and Protective Fencing the soil in mole to a Page S of S 12201 Ssramga -Sutuq vale Rd Suite D Saratoga, CA 95070 Tel: (409) 996 -1744 Fax: (408) 996-1742 Theourof& mp laysaad spev6wti- dustberermeeedmthe nocii6c sloe am wbich Ihoywa i paWa,a! andpabbeid ntheme pabNrtirobeydy ll- de�iemwhusw err ts dlc Pl mmd Wtispmh ma,, Tres specdntilu• n®eios wifi-ft (li Assoc, heel DniprwahmapnJWiew Viaml unmet cosh 0aw pans and :W= emethaoe pima fide erWenm aftbeaccaptmm L7ie.t Mr. & Mrs. Labio 19721 Purkview Coon Cupertino, CA 95014 Pmjaoc New Two Story House 15211 Ballecourt Dr. Saratoga, CA 95070 Client Revisions No. Deampdoo Dats 1 06,06.66 2 ONf9A6 3 ofim" 4 R/Ab6106 6 07/16006 6 oanom 7 01mv 8 9 to II 12 City Revisions N. Deemptica Deas 1 Plsooina Commepm 0d/1a67 2 Plmm a, Ca omm is 65!03007 3 Owner Climate 10r29M7 4 3 6 7 8 Dexa 09/19106 Scala N.T.B. Drawn >7 NEF CLeaked BY RN Saes Title: Arbofzst Report Page I ShW Na.: AR -1 F- 1: \Baut Over tWeh\OwalPlel0 -2%07 lob:BeOwmpt A � TREE INVENTORY TABLE � d j � Dewlptlm i g r 9 0610696 2 g TUBE N0. TRP£NAME � < 07106% 3 N 07!2896 6 OB/Ib96 by IHOdar ceder 7.5 Is 7s 50 Good High 5 10 x f66D I B Cedra daodam > 35 @ 50 Fair Moderate 2 X X 021M17 $2 630 NO. Oren waade 3 Owen Chipyn r e S < .� r 6 p TREE Acacia dmmar I8 45 25 23 Fair law � X s X �* 2p Eacatypau Eu rudfr 6 30 30 50 Fair Modmb - ' 2 X x X7 S{ 000 ' 21 Doagks fa 3J3 . 60 73 75 Good High 2 % X 7 800 I Pr rwszictl 12 40 75 25 Goal ' h 3 High 13-6W 22 D.W. fa 13 IS 50 23 Fair Moderate 4 � X SI 110 2 Pseudo mouledi 20 30 30 2$ Good Mob 3 Redwood b r rersr 12.3 13 51090 50 Datsgku fa High 5 X • SO Good $1 20 1 X - 53 Gdm Calocedw dreumas IO.s .3 Preudoc unnsi4atl 20 30 73 50 Good Hi 3 5340 $12,600 31810 Redwood Dongler fa Zd 35 7 SO Good Hi 3 X S9 300 4 Pmdmmro memiasll 36 50 75 50 Ceod Moderom 3 5 $1960 SJ 440 S - p0uyks fv 11.3 30 Redwood SO Good - I X $3 3 Preudatsu meazfadl 203 50 75 50 Good High' 3 73 75 Good 11,900 5 Donglu fir 35.3 60 SS 100 SO (iaad Madmen Redwood X X $4360 6 Pseudorm amamia0 21.5 50 73 SO Good Madm3 3 56 rs 'rue I4 - $2,100 33 Dw8la+ftr Fair Low 5 • X Gaud Hi 3520 $3 310 7 P eudaw mmieai 17.5 3 50 50 Good h3odmat 3 57 Redwood Se wia rem reu 19 $1,330 35 DooBke & Pert Low 5 X Good Hi 5940 Redwood ] Fseudaw mm +is7! IS 2! 25 25 Fels Ww 3 X $12200 1340 SS Dotlgks m 11 23 ' 23 Good Hi 5 X S23 70D $980 9 Pseudo menserr/i 27 43 50 50. Hilh Low 5 X S1000 $3.10D .& uokr Caomy kkod pine Ilougkr fir 23 75 39 . 10.5. 30 25 75 Good Hi 5 10 Prevdopu a mwekr6' 303 45 73 50 Good High 4 31 12.280 213 Redwood 73 30 Good Moderm 2 X 40 ems olio ]3 25 25 23 Peir 11.3 25 75 75 Good High 4 519100 Cant live oak S1,0170 - I)weka Cu � . 3 0 33 61 12 Peeudo amenxiu6 .273 50 73 30 Good Mob 3 SS 800 S 90 S5.200 ]6. Redwood CaaR live ark 4. Good Hi S X X 51690 ;4 Coast live ark 13 S aia rcm 245 35 75 75 Good His 3 Good H' -3 S10,100 7 I)eadw cede $1 130 SO Good Hi Cart Eve oak 73, 5600 37 uota 14 Cedrres deodarw 16 35 25 50 Fatr Madaam 2 9 35 75 $1 ,630 Goad Redwood 5 X 5600' - Curet Jr. oak IS S star rvwes 13 IS 100 100 Good High 3 W I7450 6S Redwood 73 50 Good Moderem 5 X 3420 ]6 S uoia swear 143 15 100 100 Gwd Hi b 2 fd 270 Ikodv cede - 65 +ms a olio 163 33 75 25 Good Hi . 5 X P Cedes deodan 12.5 25 50 50 Fair Madmen 2 SI 350 66 +uar 133 35 75 . 75 Good Hi 5 X X $ 0- am*J10 Addmm: March 36, 2007 15211 Belk Court - Addren: 15211 Belk Cmsrt Much 26, 2007 A � TREE INVENTORY TABLE � d j � Dewlptlm i g r 9 0610696 2 g TUBE N0. TRP£NAME � < 07106% 3 N 07!2896 6 OB/Ib96 by IHOdar ceder 7.5 Is 7s 50 Good High 5 10 x f66D I B Cedra daodam > 35 @ 50 Fair Moderate 2 X X 021M17 $2 630 NO. Oren waade 3 Owen Chipyn r e S < .� r 6 p TREE Acacia dmmar I8 45 25 23 Fair law � X s X �* 2p Eacatypau Eu rudfr 6 30 30 50 Fair Modmb - ' 2 X x X7 S{ 000 ' 21 Doagks fa 3J3 . 60 73 75 Good High 2 % X 7 800 I Pr rwszictl 12 40 75 25 Goal ' h 3 High 13-6W 22 D.W. fa 13 IS 50 23 Fair Moderate 4 � X SI 110 2 Pseudo mouledi 20 30 30 2$ Good Mob 3 Redwood b r rersr 12.3 13 51090 50 Datsgku fa High 5 X • SO Good $1 20 1 X - 53 Gdm Calocedw dreumas IO.s .3 Preudoc unnsi4atl 20 30 73 50 Good Hi 3 5340 $12,600 31810 Redwood Dongler fa Zd 35 7 SO Good Hi 3 X S9 300 4 Pmdmmro memiasll 36 50 75 50 Ceod Moderom 3 5 $1960 SJ 440 S - p0uyks fv 11.3 30 Redwood SO Good - I X $3 3 Preudatsu meazfadl 203 50 75 50 Good High' 3 73 75 Good 11,900 5 Donglu fir 35.3 60 SS 100 SO (iaad Madmen Redwood X X $4360 6 Pseudorm amamia0 21.5 50 73 SO Good Madm3 3 56 rs 'rue I4 - $2,100 33 Dw8la+ftr Fair Low 5 • X Gaud Hi 3520 $3 310 7 P eudaw mmieai 17.5 3 50 50 Good h3odmat 3 57 Redwood Se wia rem reu 19 $1,330 35 DooBke & Pert Low 5 X Good Hi 5940 Redwood ] Fseudaw mm +is7! IS 2! 25 25 Fels Ww 3 X $12200 1340 SS Dotlgks m 11 23 ' 23 Good Hi 5 X S23 70D $980 9 Pseudo menserr/i 27 43 50 50. Hilh Low 5 X S1000 $3.10D .& uokr Caomy kkod pine Ilougkr fir 23 75 39 . 10.5. 30 25 75 Good Hi 5 10 Prevdopu a mwekr6' 303 45 73 50 Good High 4 31 12.280 213 Redwood 73 30 Good Moderm 2 X 40 ems olio ]3 25 25 23 Peir 11.3 25 75 75 Good High 4 519100 Cant live oak S1,0170 - I)weka Cu � . 3 0 33 61 12 Peeudo amenxiu6 .273 50 73 30 Good Mob 3 SS 800 S 90 S5.200 ]6. Redwood CaaR live ark 4. Good Hi S X X 51690 ;4 Coast live ark 13 S aia rcm 245 35 75 75 Good His 3 Good H' -3 S10,100 7 I)eadw cede $1 130 SO Good Hi Cart Eve oak 73, 5600 37 uota 14 Cedrres deodarw 16 35 25 50 Fatr Madaam 2 9 35 75 $1 ,630 Goad Redwood 5 X 5600' - Curet Jr. oak IS S star rvwes 13 IS 100 100 Good High 3 W I7450 6S Redwood 73 50 Good Moderem 5 X 3420 ]6 S uoia swear 143 15 100 100 Gwd Hi b 2 fd 270 Ikodv cede - 65 +ms a olio 163 33 75 25 Good Hi . 5 X P Cedes deodan 12.5 25 50 50 Fair Madmen 2 SI 350 A � TREE INVENTORY TABLE � d j � Dewlptlm i g r 9 0610696 2 g TUBE N0. TRP£NAME � < 07106% 3 N 07!2896 6 OB/Ib96 by IHOdar ceder 7.5 Is 7s 50 Good High 5 10 x f66D I B Cedra daodam 133 35 50 50 Fair Moderate 2 X X 021M17 $2 630 NO. Oren waade 3 Owen Chipyn a S < .� 6 I9 Acacia dmmar I8 45 25 23 Fair law 2 X X X 5360 2p Eacatypau Eu rudfr 6 30 30 50 Fair Modmb - ' 2 X x X7 S{ 000 ' 21 Peeudo a esemiesii 3J3 . 60 73 75 Good High 2 % X 7 800 71 Cedes �131 35 NO. TREE NAME Good a: 3 High u 00 22 Caloeedeta deasrrmw 13 IS 50 23 Fair Moderate 4 � X SI 110 Pr nwuktd Coder SO 75 73 Goad High 2 52 Redwood b r rersr 12.3 13 SO 50 Good High 5 X • SO Good $1 20 1 X - 53 Gdm Calocedw dreumas IO.s IS 25 50 Fair Low 5 X Madmen 5 5340 $12,600 Redwood Piaur oaaariora Zd 35 7 SO Good Hi 3 X S9 300 79 54 S uofa r rau 21.5 /0 75 75 Good Hih 5 $1960 S +scar N 11.3 30 Redwood SO Good Modern I X $3 91 MaWemJ Dloe 14 30 50 !3 sew ]B.5 35 73 75 Good Hih 5 platy radlam 35.3 60 SS 100 SO (iaad Madmen Redwood X X $4360 63 Redwood 13.3 20 .50 30 Good Madm3 56 rs 'rue I4 1D 33 23 Fair Low 5 • X Gaud Hi 3520 $3 310 84 Redwood 70 75 50 23 High I 5 5 57 Redwood Se wia rem reu 19 30 35 25 Pert Low 5 X Good Hi 5940 Redwood 26 30 75 50 Good High S X $12200 29 SS n r 11 23 71 23 Good Hi 5 X S23 70D $980 Redwood 29.5 35 Coen live oak 53. Good Hilh S S1000 30 .& uokr Caomy kkod pine 153 23 75 39 olio 10.5. 30 25 75 Good Hi 5 X 9 23 $810 75 Good High Covet live oak 31 nut eanmimrir 213 3D 73 30 Good Moderm 2 X 40 ems olio ]3 25 25 23 Peir Madvam S Good Hi 2 2610 X 519100 Cant live oak corms kknd pine � . 3 0 33 61 m l2 30 75 . 73 Good Hi 3 SS 800 S 90 ems lice ]6. .35 CaaR live ark 4. Good Hi S X X 51690 ;4 Coast live ark 35 73 62 ercura olio 11 23 75 50 Good H' -3 Redwood - 7 13 $1 130 SO Good Hi Cart Eve oak 73, 5600 37 uota 13.5 35 73 SO Gaud Hi I S 63 lice 9 35 75 25 Goad Hi 5 X 5600' - Curet Jr. oak W emus olio 6S 10 73 50 Good Moderem 5 X 3420 Ones lies oak Addsus: Marc► 36.1007 15211 Belk Court •TREE INVENTORY TABLE • 17F; - 65 +ms a olio 163 33 75 25 Good Hi . 5 X - S3 790 Cold live oak 66 +uar 133 35 75 . 75 Good Hi 5 X X $ 0- am*J10 Addmm: March 36, 2007 15211 Belk Court - A � TREE INVENTORY TABLE � d j � Dewlptlm i g r 9 0610696 2 g TUBE N0. TRP£NAME � < 07106% 3 N 07!2896 6 OB/Ib96 by IHOdar ceder 7.5 Is 7s 50 Good High 5 10 x f66D I B Cedra daodam 133 35 50 50 Fair Moderate 2 X X 021M17 $2 630 NO. Oren waade 3 Owen Chipyn a j 6 I9 Acacia dmmar I8 45 25 23 Fair law 2 X X X 5360 2p Eacatypau Eu rudfr 6 30 30 50 Fair Modmb - ' 2 X x X7 S{ 000 ' 21 Peeudo a esemiesii 3J3 . 60 73 75 Good High 2 % X 7 800 71 Cedes �131 35 50 50 Good HI 3 High u 00 22 Caloeedeta deasrrmw 13 IS 50 23 Fair Moderate 4 � X SI 110 Pr nwuktd Coder SO 75 73 Goad High 2 27500 23 Coloeedrm dearrmu 18.3 30 30 SO Good Moderate 1 X - $3470 77 Ceaery Lkd pine 213 43 75 73 Good Madmen 5 $12,600 24 Piaur oaaariora Zd 35 7 SO Good Hi 3 X S9 300 79 Cast tiro oak 153 33 SO 75 Good Modmk 5 $1960 25 +scar N 11.3 30 73 SO Good Modern I X $3 91 MaWemJ Dloe 14 30 50 75 Gaol Modmm 3 X X SUM $I 620 26 platy radlam 35.3 60 73 SO (iaad Madmen 1 X X $4360 63 Redwood 13.3 20 .50 30 Good Madm3 X JX] 5830 51040 27 Se uoia r 19 33 73 30 Gaud Hi S $3 310 84 Redwood 70 75 50 23 High I 5 5 $3310 51140 28 S Redwood 32.3 JO 73 73 Good Hi S $13 400 26 30 75 50 Good High S X $12200 29 S sroia r 'rrur 12.3 30 73 75 Good Hi 2 S23 70D 46 Redwood 29.5 35 75 30 Good Hilh S S1000 30 .& uokr Caomy kkod pine 153 23 75 75 Good 2 52830 47 9 23 75 75 Good High 5 31 nut eanmimrir 213 3D 73 30 Good Moderm 2 X S! B50 32 Rtdmod �, 43.5 50 75 15 Good Hi 2 X X 519100 92.600 corms kknd pine � . 3 0 33 Can lire oak 27 40 73 30 Good H' h 1 X SS 800 67 ems lice ]6. .35 75 75 Good Hi S X X 51690 ;4 Coast live ark 35 73 50 Good Moderate 1 X - 56400 68 Redwood - 7 13 75 SO Good Hi 5600 A � TREE INVENTORY TABLE � d j � Dewlptlm i g r 9 0610696 2 g TUBE N0. TRP£NAME � < 07106% 3 N 07!2896 6 OB/Ib96 by IHOdar ceder 7.5 Is 7s 50 Good High 5 10 x f66D I B Cedra daodam 133 35 50 50 Fair Moderate 2 X X 021M17 $2 630 NO. Oren waade 3 Owen Chipyn a j 6 I9 Acacia dmmar I8 45 25 23 Fair law 2 X X X 5360 2p Eacatypau Eu rudfr 6 30 30 50 Fair Modmb - ' 2 X x X7 S{ 000 ' 21 Peeudo a esemiesii 3J3 . 60 73 75 Good High 2 % X 7 800 71 Cedes �131 35 50 50 Good HI 3 High u 00 22 Caloeedeta deasrrmw 13 IS 50 23 Fair Moderate 4 � X SI 110 Pr nwuktd Coder SO 75 73 Goad High 2 27500 23 Coloeedrm dearrmu 18.3 30 30 SO Good Moderate 1 X - $3470 77 Ceaery Lkd pine 213 43 75 73 Good Madmen 5 $12,600 24 Piaur oaaariora Zd 35 7 SO Good Hi 3 X S9 300 79 Cast tiro oak 153 33 SO 75 Good Modmk 5 $1960 25 +scar N 11.3 30 73 SO Good Modern I X $3 91 MaWemJ Dloe 14 30 50 75 Gaol Modmm 3 X X SUM $I 620 26 platy radlam 35.3 60 73 SO (iaad Madmen 1 X X $4360 63 Redwood 13.3 20 .50 30 Good Madm3 X JX] 5830 51040 27 Se uoia r 19 33 73 30 Gaud Hi S $3 310 84 Redwood 70 75 50 23 High I 5 5 $3310 51140 28 S Redwood 32.3 JO 73 73 Good Hi S $13 400 26 30 75 50 Good High S X $12200 29 S sroia r 'rrur 12.3 30 73 75 Good Hi 2 S23 70D 46 Redwood 29.5 35 75 30 Good Hilh S S1000 30 .& uokr Caomy kkod pine 153 23 75 75 Good 2 52830 47 9 23 75 75 Good High 5 31 nut eanmimrir 213 3D 73 30 Good Moderm 2 X S! B50 32 Rtdmod �, 43.5 50 75 15 Good Hi 2 X X 519100 92.600 corms kknd pine � . 33 Paw coaarieery 27 40 73 30 Good H' h 1 X SS 800 Deader cedar =75 ;4 CeNut dsodaro 35 73 50 Good Moderate 1 X - 56400 Redwood - 13, 37 uota 13.5 35 73 SO Gaud Hi I S X 53 !0 Addsus: Marc► 36.1007 15211 Belk Court •TREE INVENTORY TABLE • 17F; Address' Match 26, 2007 ]stn Beue cams TREE NO. TREE NAME � d j � Dewlptlm i g r 9 0610696 2 g TUBE N0. TRP£NAME � < 07106% 3 N 07!2896 6 OB/Ib96 by IHOdar ceder 7.5 Is 7s 50 Good High 5 10 x f66D I B Cedra daodam 133 35 50 50 Fair Moderate 2 X X 021M17 $2 630 NO. Oren waade 3 Owen Chipyn a j 6 I9 Acacia dmmar I8 45 25 23 Fair law 2 X X X 5360 2p Eacatypau Eu rudfr 6 30 30 50 Fair Modmb - ' 2 X x X7 S{ 000 ' 21 Peeudo a esemiesii 3J3 . 60 73 75 Good High 2 % X 7 800 71 Cedes �131 35 50 50 Good HI 3 u 00 22 Caloeedeta deasrrmw 13 IS 50 23 Fair Moderate 4 � X SI 110 Pr nwuktd Coder SO 75 73 Goad High 2 27500 23 Coloeedrm dearrmu 18.3 30 30 SO Good Moderate 1 X - $3470 77 Ceaery Lkd pine 213 43 75 73 Good Madmen 5 $12,600 24 Piaur oaaariora Zd 35 7 SO Good Hi 3 X S9 300 79 Cast tiro oak 153 33 SO 75 Good Modmk 5 $1960 25 +scar N 11.3 30 73 SO Good Modern I X $3 91 MaWemJ Dloe 14 30 50 75 Gaol Modmm 3 X X SUM $I 620 26 platy radlam 35.3 60 73 SO (iaad Madmen 1 X X $4360 63 Redwood 13.3 20 .50 30 Good Madm3 X JX] 5830 51040 27 Se uoia r 19 33 73 30 Gaud Hi S $3 310 84 Redwood 70 75 50 23 High I 5 5 $3310 51140 28 S Redwood 32.3 JO 73 73 Good Hi S $13 400 26 30 75 50 Good High S X $12200 29 S sroia r 'rrur 12.3 30 73 75 Good Hi 2 S23 70D 46 Redwood 29.5 35 75 30 Good Hilh S S1000 30 .& uokr Caomy kkod pine 153 23 75 75 Good 2 52830 47 9 23 75 75 Good High 5 31 nut eanmimrir 213 3D 73 30 Good Moderm 2 X S! B50 32 Rtdmod �, 43.5 50 75 15 Good Hi 2 X X 519100 92.600 corms kknd pine � . 33 Paw coaarieery 27 40 73 30 Good H' h 1 X SS 800 Deader cedar =75 ;4 CeNut dsodaro 35 73 50 Good Moderate 1 X - 56400 TREE NO. TREE NAME � d j � Dewlptlm i g r 9 0610696 2 g NO. 7RSR NAME � < 07106% 3 N 07!2896 6 OB/Ib96 by Csua live oak olm 7.5 Is 7s 50 Good High 5 10 x f66D 7p Coot live ak lice 73 30 75 50 Good High 3 X X 021M17 . 52010 NO. DeoNr char 3 Owen Chipyn a j 6 71 Eur�uds+ 21 40 73 ZS Poor Resmve S X X Sheet 79tle: Arborist Report Page 2 20 72 Cool live oak m 273, 13.17 so is w Gaud � s x X7 $15 .800 73 Redwood uaiar 22 40 75 75 Good High S t % X 57300 71 Deaden sides C<drset drodam �131 35 50 50 Good HI 3 u 00 75 Deadsxdm Cedrur dada+a 43 50 ZS Good Moderate 5 $ Pr nwuktd Redwood SO 75 73 Goad High 2 27500 76 S We 8 15 100 100 Good Hi 77 I)eadc sxdm Cedes dmdan 213 43 75 73 Good Madmen 5 $12,600 7g Deaden ado Cdrvr deodam 23S 50 50 30 l3ood Modmm 3 47 79 Deodar asdec Ced+tu 153 33 SO 75 Good Modmk 5 $1960 80 Deodv ceder Crdrur drodara 22 40 30 73 Madame 3 42 91 Deadrr coder deodara 14 30 50 75 Gaol Modmm 3 X X SUM $I 620 82 Deodm ceder CeNut dmdcn 24 35 SO 23 Fair Modmte 3 X S2 63 7 13.3 20 .50 30 Good Madm3 X JX] 5830 51040 Cap five oak Redwood (p 44 84 wiat 70 75 50 23 High I 5 5 $3310 51140 TREE INVENTORY'MBLEI 15111 BeOe Csam . . •TREE INVENTORY March 26, 2007 CSkot Mr. &Mrs. Labio 19721 Pmicview (buR CA 95014 )kof eot New Two Story House 15211 Bellocouct Dr. 3t¢ntoga4 CA 95070 11e e ie Dewlptlm i g r 9 0610696 2 NO. 7RSR NAME � < 07106% 3 N 07!2896 6 OB/Ib96 7 Capery Leland Plae OSA597 8 9 � 10 !1 75 P- saaar(wir 203 33 73 50 Goad H' 2 X Pte ®iog Cammmh 021M17 34.410 NO. DeoNr char 3 Owen Chipyn a j 6 30 Cedesdeodora IIS 23 SO 50 Fair i Law 3. X Chxiad By. RN Sheet 79tle: Arborist Report Page 2 $1400 37 Iaadm phm Plarwuur acM la 13 25 73 SO Goad � 3 X X7 51630 Redwood 38 rem DauSW 8t 44.3 60 100 SD Goad 3 u 00 39 Pr nwuktd 29.3 SO 75 73 Goad High 2 27500 Redwood yp S la 78.1 W 75 73 Goad 1 $12,600 Redwood 47 S b ll 23 75 75 Good High 4 $1960 42 Pmdo merwlrrU 31 60 77 75 Goad Ni S SUM Redwood 43 ok rm 7 15 75 75 .Good HjRb S 5830 Cap five oak 11.5, (p 44 eado Mta 73 70 75 75 Good High I 5 X $3310 Cau Bvw ork : IS 26 30 75 50 Good High S X $12200 Redwood I5, I 46 uola race rasa 29.5 35 75 30 Good Hilh S S1000 Caert lire oak 47 9 23 75 75 Good High 5 $1840 Redwood 48 a Redwood 11 30 . 75 30 Good '1 S X 92.600 � 49 uofa rem 17.5 40 SD 30 Gaud High J X 52110 Setae pme =75 SO Pima 73 50 d Ht 5 X 59400 Redwood - 13, 37 uota 13.5 35 73 SO Gaud Hi I S X 53 !0 15111 BeOe Csam . . •TREE INVENTORY March 26, 2007 7'eul Appnlad Value , Rrylaeewlwlt 7tee Vehta ' 15 gallon . 5150 21 ioAhoa- 5300 361aeh boa ^ 51,500 48 ierk bac =SS,000 52 i0cbbox -7.000 nicety box- SI5,00� Should m0' aee Band above 4came dwegd owwr wsn be rM®ed'o-Pk datmee. Should any areliwrd edwe be Ipnoved otraer vvOl be regsmed mre0eoe that rip with trey egsol m value m its arreoed "be- Add=: 16211 Base Corot March 2d, 2007 MEMARIEASSOC., INC. 12201 SmBwps4ltn¢yvale Rd Saito D 95M T6L 996- 1744 Fos (408) 996 -1742 The set of there pimr aced rpecifiatbor aha0 be rarmcbd to the rpeoiec nt 8u whkhlhgweeplapmeA.odPWataot ' ehdl6e m�ptmaq�l®kcdb wmb oaa Rmm,rap�oaa PohEima.MmTSm16o4 bwhalemia Dwtk 6laoheslM TiBe ==-.d=. mda wBkMmmie A�oo„ IoW Ymdtmmlw0h mere pktn aed of iherumcdoaorhs8 aoo.tro0e pi®a 8da arldee0e olme acoeplmap CSkot Mr. &Mrs. Labio 19721 Pmicview (buR CA 95014 )kof eot New Two Story House 15211 Bellocouct Dr. 3t¢ntoga4 CA 95070 Clint Revisions Na. Dewlptlm i 1 0610696 2 o6n9w6 3 ofili7iD6 < 07106% 3 N 07!2896 6 OB/Ib96 7 OSA597 8 9 10 !1 TREE IZ City Revisions Na Deamiptioo Deb 1 Pte ®iog Cammmh 021M17 2 NO. TREE 3 Owen Chipyn 1029A7 a 6 Ikodv sxdv 8 j Sale: N.TB. Ilxawa Hy: NU Chxiad By. RN Sheet 79tle: Arborist Report Page 2 8hst No.: AR-2 83 Cedrnr deoekva 23 23 33 30 Frh M m� 5 X X7 5780 Cawm 8w � 86 3 6.3 23 100 30 Good 7'eul Appnlad Value , Rrylaeewlwlt 7tee Vehta ' 15 gallon . 5150 21 ioAhoa- 5300 361aeh boa ^ 51,500 48 ierk bac =SS,000 52 i0cbbox -7.000 nicety box- SI5,00� Should m0' aee Band above 4came dwegd owwr wsn be rM®ed'o-Pk datmee. Should any areliwrd edwe be Ipnoved otraer vvOl be regsmed mre0eoe that rip with trey egsol m value m its arreoed "be- Add=: 16211 Base Corot March 2d, 2007 MEMARIEASSOC., INC. 12201 SmBwps4ltn¢yvale Rd Saito D 95M T6L 996- 1744 Fos (408) 996 -1742 The set of there pimr aced rpecifiatbor aha0 be rarmcbd to the rpeoiec nt 8u whkhlhgweeplapmeA.odPWataot ' ehdl6e m�ptmaq�l®kcdb wmb oaa Rmm,rap�oaa PohEima.MmTSm16o4 bwhalemia Dwtk 6laoheslM TiBe ==-.d=. mda wBkMmmie A�oo„ IoW Ymdtmmlw0h mere pktn aed of iherumcdoaorhs8 aoo.tro0e pi®a 8da arldee0e olme acoeplmap CSkot Mr. &Mrs. Labio 19721 Pmicview (buR CA 95014 )kof eot New Two Story House 15211 Bellocouct Dr. 3t¢ntoga4 CA 95070 Clint Revisions Na. Dewlptlm Doe 1 0610696 2 o6n9w6 3 ofili7iD6 < 07106% 3 07!2896 6 OB/Ib96 7 OSA597 8 9 10 !1 IZ City Revisions Na Deamiptioo Deb 1 Pte ®iog Cammmh 021M17 2 Ph®ioBCOa ®rob o5ro3m 3 Owen Chipyn 1029A7 a 6 8 Dek: 08119A6 Sale: N.TB. Ilxawa Hy: NU Chxiad By. RN Sheet 79tle: Arborist Report Page 2 8hst No.: AR-2 Fik:7:lBellewmtlASOh10wa1pIg130 -29-07 Job:l�Jkemat v • ceenatushy Devdeparwet ospartdwM Cyds..roaa tgrr F.M.IsAw Soabsa, odraeds ses70 15211 B1111MItrt Dr. Application 0: 07.160 wRBOliI6f hdEPOR7' r ®e 17, 2 APN 5104)3- 012 preparedbyKateBear,CityArbmid Owner. Labia Phone (408) 869-1276 II4 WDUMON The property owner of 15211 Belle Court submitted revised plans w to the city May 21, 2007 addressing the comments from the previous arboriat report SPTE OBSERVATIONS, PLAN REVMW AND TECHNICAL DISCUSSION The merest soberest report and tree inventory table dated December 22, 2006 report am still included in the plans along with the revised report and truetervertarytabledatedMardi20 .2007. Theplocahoold mclode the wborist report and Use inventory table dated March 20, 2007; the report and table dated December 22, 2006 should be daided. Removals A total of 29 trees are proposed far removal on the plan. The f0owiog ran are listed for removal to Shaer Ll: #8, 9.19, 20. 23 — 25,26, 31- 35.36,44, 48 — 53, 56.57, 59, 66, 67, 71,73, end 86. Tres #22 is shown to be removed, but not Hated. Trees #45.81 mid 83 will be retmed. Tree 034 is newly proposed to be removed to socomanodate drainage mound the boom. Tea #IS is not listed on the deco plan but is in direct conflict with the storm drain around the house. Ireludhag tra #18 bAM the WW of trove proposed for removal to 30. The owners propose to pled a total of 3 — 36 inch box redwoods, 1 — 36 inch box coact live ask, 2 — 48 inch box mast live o" and 3 — 48 inch box flowering peel new fm screening end to replace: the removed area Tbut satisfies the requirement to plant trplacammt tree equal to 530.000, based we replacement values provided in Ore Dwmbc 22, 2007 report Excavation; tri whinge grading and drduage Drainage iesuo pointed oat in the Mard 20 report have not yet been completely resolved. Drainage wood the louse goes tbmngh ado tree #18 width will cause this eta to be lod, altaongb it is not proposed for removal 13ttosvadon for drainage is proposed only five feet from Douglas fir #21 and only six feet from redwood #29. No temovshon should occur under the canopy ofeather tuna Rather, the mM should be enameled under for drainage pipes so that all roots men -ing two inches or target are retained If ueea #21 and 29 we lost due to matching or root damage, dray well berequired to be replaced with native heat Equal In VdU to UV* tWpmtW values of$7AW and $2,%700 No excavation for the sport court should occur within 10 feat of the vunk of tree #45. Drainage for the sport court should lore under to roots for item #74 and 45 so that roote measuring 2lneles or larger err retained Roots measuring Iwe the two inch® may be cut with a sharp pursing tool 15211 Bette Court RECOMMENDATIONS t. This report, as well as the revised report and Tire roveotwy Table, dated March 20,20D7, shall be included in the final plea act 2. Owner dull plant replacement trace and ecroem ig shrubs to mitigate tho removal of trees for the project A replacement value of530001) in replacement trees and screening shrubs a recommended Ten of the trees shall be from the ft&wing list of ndives: coast five oat (QU=us aVMhhs), valley osk (Qamem /edam), blue oak (Q-- dewglasfinea), his& oak (Querns bdlog A big 1- fravit (A- 1#aero kk1hers), Cdifomia buckeye (Asraher aaktrWoa), Douglas fu (Pterdoseygo men unfi) and coot redwood (Sequoia gmaparArrmu), 3. Contractor shall tunnel under mots of hen #21,29,45 and 74 for drainage when drain links arc proposed ruder tree couples. No roots measuring 2 inches or larger shah be cut to histall drams. Boole neesmeig true too two inches may be cut with a sharp priming tool. 4, T—# 1 8 is shown to be retained but is in the aerate location as a dray. This shall be clarified on the final plans. laacee 2 of 2 MEMARIEASSOC., INC. 12201 SAIM0,ge- Sunnyvale Rd. Suite D Sandogs, CA 95070 Ted: (408) 996 -1744 Fax: (408) 996-1742 7be aro ofinero Plata and rpetifiaatim.hall a nrDicted to the qucifie dbtor which merwaie laapua I sedpwbNmtlm mQaof aha0 be awasiy Native to mb me. 8em%reprW.Ow or pu6aeaamb)agymehod,mwhek erl lb Maapnrh ssor Tab b Okplat. andaF#.A- Vivadcc cmM�cAaeoc„ fiat./ Dwip,arwawtpaalodlew vimdead.rowab mawplasaand �apedfl� .hall prima Sale eNdmoe ofthe arapyasv CJimt MT. & Mrs. Labio 19721 Pddtview Court Cupertino, CA 95014 Project New Two Story House 15211 Bellaomrt Dr. Saratoga, CA 95070 Client Revisions No. Der.Wm nun 1 0650606 2 ON19N6 3 oarr7l06 4 Or/Obm6 5 07=0116 6 06gM06 7 OSJOSA7 6 9 10 11 12 City ReAgions Nn Datoptim pee 1 pYodog Goemoeen MGM 2 Phodol Cow mr WOW 3 0wner2= 1.29107 4 5 6 7 8 Dab: 08/194)6 Scale: N.T8 Dawn Br: NU Sbeet Titic Arborist Report Page 3 Sheet No, AR-3 Far: 11Ballxmce W oa10,m1PIgU 0,29-07 lab: BeOeoowt w • APN: 510-03 -012 Zone: R-140,000 Lot Size: 45,784 sqft Maximum Impervious Cover: 35% or 16,024 sgtk Proposed Impervious Cover. Msin house Floor 3103 Garage 900 Porches nod Entry 496 Driveway, and Walk 4456 Light Wells 502 Sport Court 4255 Rear Patio 1908 Total Proposed: 15,620 sqft General Now *Tres removed due to health (from arborists report) #'s: 8,9,19,20,36,53,56,57,71 *Trees removed due to construction of proposed house and driveway #'s: 18, 22, 23, 2A, 25, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 86 I .� *Trees removed due to proposed sports court #'s: 44, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 59, 73 *Trees removed for rear lawn area, appearance or structural concems: . #'s: 26, 35 (trees 926 has a heavy double leader, #31 heavy foliage only on one side, #32 was topped in the past, #45 needs pruning) *9 new replacement trees are proposed m area that have space for maturity and canopy development as well as screening advantages. T-1 - Sequoia sempervuens/Redwood (3) 36" box size T- 2 - Quereus agnfWuVCoaa Live Oak (I) 36" box size T -3 - Querrus agrifoha (2) 48" box size T4 -Pyms calleryance Chanticleer /Omemental Pear (3) 48" box size Total value of propond race per arbmins valuation. - 834-,M.o0 .. - . a.:drm m se.a a_.r.w. ne,p.a L-o oem m�y.m 'Tree pion fimoing sbdl be estabGehad prior to ray wading ortbe arrival of construction erryrpmou or mawrWs os situ. It shall be comprised of six -foot high rham link1i ncmg mounted on eigWIbot tali, two i ch diameter Phimu ed poste, driven 24" into the ground and spaced no more thm lo' sparL Ono, o"hshed, the haft osut round, undisturbed and be maintsnted throughout the conttruabon proces, until final *Any grading or trenching under a tree's canopy shall be approved by the city arbmint Prior m performing the work Napproved, it shell be done manually using dnvela Any roots measuring 2" of larger shell be retained and tunneled under roots measuring bas . than 2* may be cut with a sharp p etieg inmammt *Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities mm be conducted outside the designated wed a d to, (am if aovng is removed). Those activities indudad, but are MDwmg: demolition. grading tteachieg, egWpmmt �tdp kpe linggaand dumping materials (WAMUrg mil fig), and equipmasevehide operation 'Landscape plans shall consider the Ibltowing•. L Irrigation system stall Dot spray onto tanks of existing trip. Valve bares chili be located outside ofdrip lines of tree moopies. b. Plane dell be selected with similar water raquhoman to the tae, under which they will be placed. c. Lawns shall be designed so there is room between them and the truck of any tree, the lawn shall be confined to area to the outride 20% ofthe ere, under the d.IIf canopy Oats are included in the plant design, only drought ulmmt plants compatible with nab shad be plmmd under the outer 206 of the canopy. Lawn shag not be iahrded whhin the drip line ofany oak tree an the property. Racommeod placing mulch under the atsM -,t-A of Own. e Top dressings (stone or mulch) shop remain at least one foot ilom the tunic, of rommed trees and am inches from new tree, £ No tilling or mipplag oftopsoil beneath the tree's anopiea including for weed control, will be allowed. g. Any beaderboard or ether ads* metmialn proposed beneath tree oxapies, sW be set on top of a dsting no wade, *Any pruning of em" trees shall be pwftnW under the supervision of en ISA ' Certified Arbom and according m ISA standards. ' � V � \! � �'A .ujw.ar s"Rw T VI i 1._iftrsL��++a*e :WIG LAIYOSCAvg VI- N ,mss T29 treeto rat) _ t(ww x51 Brisd treeto. � Propomd are aF`m'merku'' CSCProposed shrub n f s I'O 0 A. NOTES` 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2.. BASIS OF ELEVATION IS FOUND t PIPE IN FRONT OF THE PROPERTY WITH ASSUMED ELEVATION 200.00. 3. BASIS OF BEARINGS, THE BEARING BETWEEN FOUND t" IP ON SELLECOURT AVENUE WAS TAKEN AS NOS 38'20 "E, RECORD OF SURVEY FILED ON MAY 11, 1948, IN BOOK 17, AT PAGE 40, SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDS. 4. THIS SURVEY WAS BASED UPON A TITLE REPORT OF STEWART TITLE OF CALIFORNIA OR No: 28415518, DATED JANUARY 26, 2006. 5. EXACT SPECIES OF TREES ARE NOT OUR EXPERTISE AND IF THAT (FORMATION IS NEEDED AN ARBORIST SHOULD BE CONSULTED. SCALE 1 "= 16' I i i i I t �I I SMP ENGINEERS CIVIL ENGINEERS 1534 CAROB LANE LOS ALTOS CA. 94024 TEL (B50) 941 -8055 FAX (850) 941 -8755 E—MAIL' SMFENGINEERSO YAHOO.COM ONNER LEGEND ® FOUND CITY MONUMENT FOUND IRON PIPES WATER VALVE coptTacHr n 2006 ® WATER METER SMP ENGINEERS CIVIL ENGINEERS FIRE HYDRANT - CL (� GAS METER C pQ GAS VALVE �. O EX SANITARY SEWER MH > LL I O EX SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT w Z C.O. LLI V N Q Q POWER POLE 04 --+ GUY _ U 9 O PROPERTY LINE D O t METAL FENCE O O U 0 o O WOODEN FENCE O J 1:0 -- I - - - -. -S ^ - -- SANITARY SEWER LINE a W Q a WATERLINE O m Q 1 OVER HEAD ELECTRICAL LINE atS MONUMENT UNE C14 Q r Z 0 i m No. C 30442 BF.1Li' L_ EIF711 1 VALCULA M\' ReWlonc j AREA 1.051 ACRES (45,784 SQ. FT.) AVERAGE SLOPE = I/A x SUM (L) WHERE: 1= 1 FEET (SLOPE INTERVAL) SUM (L) = 2,724 FEET (TOTAL LENGTH OF CONTOURS) AVE E SL = 0.00229 x 2,724 x 1 1.051 AVE E S[ OFF = 5.9% Dots APRIL 17, 2007 Scels t" 16, Prepared by. R.N. Chedmd by. S.R/H.AV. J�b R 2649 Sheet T -1 -1 s ABBREVIATIONS FILL (CY) DESCRIPPON IMPORT (CY) DESCRIP776W AB AGGREGATE BAK (CLASS AS NOTED) ' LP LOW POINT AC - ASPHALT CONCRETE MON MONUMENT RD BC AREA DRAIN BACK OF CURB - OG ORIGINAL GROUND Bo BLOW OFF - p8 PGEV' PULL BOX PGdE VAULT BOW C&G BOTTOM OF WALL CURB AND GUTTER 'IPA PROPERTY LINE T07At "SITE RIM FLOOR (BACK) " pp -PERT POWER POLE PLASTIC PERFORATED PIPE kGARAGE c CENTERLINE CENTERLINE SWALE PSE PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT CO CLEANOIIT PVC POLYMNA CHLORIDE CP CONTROL POINT R/W RIGHT OF WAY DI DRIVEWAY RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE DI DROP SO STORM DRAIN ELITE DAYLIGHT HT SDMH STORM DRAN'MANHOLE ELCT flECT SS SANITARY SEWER LINE EP EDGE OF OF "EL{YATI(IN SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EUC US TR@IT EUCALYPTUS TREE SW SIDEWALK (E),EX Q TC TOP OF CURB FF FINIS FINISHED ED TOW TOP OF WALL FC .FH FlNfSN GRADE GRADE TOS TOF TOE-OF SLAB TOP OF FOUNDATION 'FIRE HYDRANT F1'OWLHE TP TOP OF PIPE FNC FENCE .UG LISS UNDERGROUND-GAS .UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER FOG FOG LINE UST UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN W GFF GRADE BREAK GARAGE FINISHED FLOOR (FRONT) UT UW UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND WATER GUY GUY WIRE VCP AIRSPEED CLAY PIPE HP HIGH POINT WL WHITE LINE STRIPE IP IRON PIPE WUK WAIXWAY JP JOINT POLE WM WATER METER UP UP OF GUTTER WV WATER VALVE Ur LINEAR FOOT EXISTING SD 55 - -- Sa&--- -_� OH e�T TVTV IT ® SLV O SSCO 0 �0 L�J z W'M } O LEGEND .PROPOSED F C \� /OT W _SD- - Ss - -Sul) SOH a.T'T4 G E JT— SLV SSCO ®W 0 —x x— 0 C� e DESCRIPTION PROPERTY LINE FILL AREA LIMIT CUT AREA LIMIT CONTOUR - WATER. UNE STORM DRAIN PIPE (SOUR) SANITARY SEWER PIPE SU13DRAIN - PIPE • (PERFORATED) OVERHEAD UTILITIES WITH POLE GAS LINE ELECTRIC LINE (UNDERGROUND) JOINT .TRENCH STREET LIGHT VAULT SANITARY SEWER CLfi1NOUT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SURVEY CITY MONUMENT ELECTROUER WATER METER TREE WITH TRUNK GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS ONE NEW SINGLE .FAMILY RESIDENCE 15211 BELLECOURT AVENUE., SARATOGA, CA NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY' U:SA. (UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT) AT 800 - 227 -2600 A MINIMUM OF 2 WORKING DAYS BEFORE BEGINNING UNDER - GROUND "WORK FOR *VERIFICATION OF THE LOCATION AND DEPTH OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. B 1�Poc A 1. th N T' 6- 24' 6' 6' WOODEN FENCE SPOT ELEVATION TREE PROTECTION FENCE 5' TALL CHAIN LINK SWALE DIRECTION OF FLOW IN PIPE AREA ORRIN/ INLET OVERLAND RELEASE PATH GRADE "TO DRAIN, 2% MIN. AWAY FROM HOUSE 1% MRN. FROM PROPERTY LINE TO SWALE (E) TREE TO BE REMOVE DOWN —SPOUT POP —UP EMBER L—B PLAN SECTION A —A STORM DRAIN INLET NTS HOUSE DOWNSPOUTS SEE, ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FG ELEVATION SPLASH BLOCK 2% MIN. NATIVE GRADE OR 2X4 RED WOOD HEADER CERTIFIED CPMPACTED SUBGRAOE LOCATION MAP t N.T.S. SPLASH BLOCK FOU.N©A N.T.S. HEAVY DUTY MT GRATE w 5 a SECTION H —B SHEET INDEX.• C -1 COVER SHEET/ NOTES/ DETAILS C -2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN I. Surace water sha11 be directed awe from all bulldings into drainage swales, ,utters, storm drain in andydroinoge sysfeme. 2. All roof downspouts shall discharge to concrete splash pods draining away from the foundation. See architectural plans for roof downspout locations. 3. On is storm idrain lines shall consist of solid PVC —SDR35 minimum or better. 4. Sto drain lTllets shall be precast concrete, Christy U23 type or equivalent. 5. For details of vertical curb, valley gutter, curb and gutter and curb openings, "seePrMte Street EUms. 1.. HARP WIRE THE PUMPS TO PREVENT ANY UNPLUGGING . 2. PUMPS TO BE !CONNECTED TO BACKUP GENERATORS TO PREV" FLOODING IN CASE OF BLACKOUT. 3. PROVIEIE BACK ROW PREVENTOR VALVE FOR PUMP OUTLET. 4. PROV16E RESERVE PUMP FOR EACH PUMP WELL- ALL THE PIPES T BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR BETTER. NOTES !r 1.. CONxAAGTORSHALL V.EPMJ THE LOCATION OF ALL UTJLJTIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUC710K ' 2. BASIS OF ELEVATION IS FO ND t PIPE IN FRONT OF THE PROPERTY WITH ASSUMED ELEVATION 200.00. S. BASIS OF- BEARINOS , THIS BETWEEN FOUND t iPON BELLECOURT DRIVE WAS TAKEN AS- NO&38M - RECORD,OF. SURVEY- FOFDDN -MAY1t,1948,tNBOOK1T,ATPAQE40, SANTA CLARA COUNTY RE MIRDS. '4 I 4. THIS SURVEYWAS BASE4 U PON A TITLE REPORT OF STEWART TITLE OF CALIFORNIA DRNo:- 2WS5i8, DATWJNRARY29,12WS. 5. EXACT SPECIES OF TREES i RE NOT OUR EXPERTISE AND IF THAT IFORMATION IS NEEDED AN ARBORIST WOULD HAVE TO BE CONS,I LTm EARTHWORK TABLE + BUILDING j FILL (CY) CUT (CY) IMPORT (CY) EXPORT (CY), BASEMENT/ UGHTWELLS 0 I 1,382 '0 2,213 FIRST FLOOR PAD / GARAGE 1 0 104 TOTAL BUILDING 0 j 1.486 0 1,486 SITE FILL (CY CUT (CY) IMPORT (CY) EXPORT (CY) TENMSS COURT 51 251 '0 2,213 BACKYARD (FG- 205.00) 0 i, 243' BACKYARD, (E) POOL, FILL AREA (SEE A —A) 50 0 a— BACKYARD- (FG=205.00) -0 ' 243 NO 1UU T07At "SITE .701 i 727 A .675 TO "7°AL PROJECT FILL (CY CUT (CY) IMPORT (CY) EXPORT (CY) TOTAL 11 2.162,1 '101 '0 2,213 NO TE FRAMING PER STRUCTURAL PLAN 2• EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ON THIS TABLE ARE FOR CfEY INFORMATION ONLY. CONTRACTORS ARE TO PERFORM THEIR OWN 0 AWMY TAKE OFFS. FLOOR JOIST PER STRUCTURAL PLAN Fir ELEVATION, m i I � PAD ELEVATION NOTE: , � GRADING AND dRAINAGE LAMS SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PROJECT - _ GEOTECHNICAL FH GINEER.' CEOTE HN AL ENGINEER OF RECORD THIS PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE IN NT AND OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED 81 `PURPOSE V DATED 4 BY G.E. N BY C.E.G. �, SM3� E PJ G I IV E E'FR CIVIL ENGINEERS 1534 CAROB LANE LOS ALTOS. CA 94024 TEL• (B.SOa 9N -8055 FAIL- (65w 841 -8755 E —MAIL: SMPENGINEERSO - YAHOO.COM OWNER: COPYRIGHT �C. 2007 SMP ENtlNEFRS CIVIL ENGINEERS z M a— Z NO 1UU W Q U Q z 1� J i0 U Q m z Q 0 ReY6hm: tpDFE55/OkY gp/s sr aT Date: DECEMBER 5, 2007 Scale: AS NOTED Prepared by. V.G. Checked by: S.R. Job R 2649 Sheet: 1 OF 2 C -1 0 • 220 ' W __ I �I 216,00 V-DIT i N ! 215 I _ _ FL 211 LOD i i i I I a II < m fX..s 1 210 -- '6° NATIVE - BACKFlLL FRaPOSm ' GRAPHIC SCALE -- 1 205 � I 2001 I I ___l 212 FG 252 � I I , n 195 a fHA01 L9IX IIWE PRIll FENCING +/ .T 11 I T____— DITCH i ' FL 1250 j i 1 I I I I -- t -- L... . - -- - - - - -- — I ! I ! j I L.T___ I i OW 20fiE� SECTION A -A SCALE H: 1 " =10', SCALE V. 1 °-5' 1 NOTE: -I .CONTRACTOR SHOULD RUNNEL UNDER THE ENTIRE CANOPY OF TREE /21 AT A 1,17 DEPTH OF 2.5 FEET WHEN CREATING THE SUB - DRAIN. AN AIR SPADE CAN HE ti 2, USED FOR TUNNELING. N CHAN LINK TREE PR VE FENCNG RFe�R v ! =i• >• / �910DflNi!!' TN IIV 201... /- - -- \ - -- -_- v4 �Aav '. 1 12'824' / o / .`.'PR q RETAINING W l (TVp) o ,°n IOW 2125 N N A 0 1' WIDE V —DITCH I 1 / RN21 sD 212 ZO� j RIO�Lm M ' m1` a' �W v 1 \ I /NV m4a NIA \`C - NTS \ YI - - FL 211M \ m / R GRATE \ % FINISH GRADE R.1P GATE 6' Sam PVC 2' NE CONCRETE V-D1 0 {• A fEl a,axD IN fINF - INLET/ BUBBLER DETAIL NTS I 220 tj 215 1 210 ra 205.00 _ 205 14.50 ' I I fl 200 1 a FENaNG / o I, v _ IN % 4' i WV N m \Y F mu I or (BY PaE) i IM I URI 1 1 NV. n )WV 201:50 WX TO E RELISED V II31 „I '" 200. • P 21 3/4- X 23 1/4- CONC. / Fb FL 5. - ID I 'l�'NN15 URl9 f /\ / i i I I a m < m fX..s \{ m 1. D� - _'` 4r\ k dr7 °D '6° NATIVE - BACKFlLL FRaPOSm ' GRAPHIC SCALE n� Y\ I, 217.m F / 215.50 296 / 212 FG 252 � I I , n O 8 16 32 I 220 tj 215 1 210 ra 205.00 _ 205 14.50 ' I I fl 200 1 a FENaNG / o I, v _ IN % 4' i WV N m \Y F mu I or (BY PaE) i IM I URI 1 1 NV. n )WV 201:50 WX TO E RELISED V II31 „I '" 200. • P 21 3/4- X 23 1/4- CONC. / Fb FL 5. - ID \ TC 75 4W.50 _ V24 DRAIN BOX W'� 189.08' _- R2+ -J '172" GRATE TG (SEE PLAN) nM � m 1. D� - _'` 4r\ k dr7 °D '6° NATIVE - BACKFlLL FRaPOSm ' GRAPHIC SCALE ! DHNN.LNK nd!E PROTECB VE FENfefC k\ f O 8 16 32 fHA01 L9IX IIWE PRIll FENCING +/ - g - I CAP g TEE 6 1 45 •� YP ORIGINAL GROUND " DRAIN ROOK INDICATES BX19TUiG TREE NUMBER PER AR13ORI3T REPORT GEO- TEXTILE FABRIC _ gg/gL - ...- ENCLOSE ALL ROCK SURFACES Elf INDIC ATES' E703TIIiG'TREE TO HE REMOVED • °q -'1 ( Mig 6, 8"9 PERFORATED 'PVC '�n 1 f SHALLOW GRAVEL .BASIN T INDICATES INDICATES ATES EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN c i I I ELEVATION WEW- NTS NOTE ALL TRENCHES TO BE IiAtID DIG. {ND i(ACHI TRENCHING ALIpWED) m I i `0 �44��� ,• a I i 'i{ � °� ,�'����•IrJ,� ._ � me °ill w,� �� ��y gyQ I 220 tj 215 1 210 ra 205.00 _ 205 14.50 ' I I fl 200 1 a FENaNG / o I, v _ IN % 4' i WV N m \Y F mu I or (BY PaE) i IM I URI 1 1 NV. n )WV 201:50 WX TO E RELISED t S1v�� E Pd G114 E Q: FR S; CIVIL ENGINEERS 1534 CAROB'LANE LOS ALMS, CA 94024 TEL: B50) 941 -6055 FAX: 650) 841 -8755, E -IIAU SMPENGINEERSO YAHOO.COM OWNei: COPVRIGNT C 2007 SMP ENCINITAS CIVIL ENGINEERS `n co z z ILZ g z z H V ..o W Q z LU 0 Q � p V IeNllonc ES N0. B2M p0, L/3 J'j p etc DECEMBER 5, 2007 we: w—d by V.G. Nocw by. S.R. ,b k 254.9 �b 2 OF 2 C_Z V II31 „I '" 200. • P 21 3/4- X 23 1/4- CONC. / Fb FL 5. - ID \ TC 75 4W.50 _ V24 DRAIN BOX W'� 189.08' _- R2+ -J '172" GRATE TG (SEE PLAN) nM � m 1. D� - _'` 4r\ k dr7 °D '6° NATIVE - BACKFlLL FRaPOSm ' GRAPHIC SCALE yh RET 0 WNL T1P DHNN.LNK nd!E PROTECB VE FENfefC k\ f O 8 16 32 fHA01 L9IX IIWE PRIll FENCING +/ - g - I CAP g TEE 6 1 45 •� YP ORIGINAL GROUND " DRAIN ROOK INDICATES BX19TUiG TREE NUMBER PER AR13ORI3T REPORT GEO- TEXTILE FABRIC _ gg/gL - ...- ENCLOSE ALL ROCK SURFACES INDIC ATES' E703TIIiG'TREE TO HE REMOVED • °q -'1 ( 6, 8"9 PERFORATED 'PVC '�n 1 f SHALLOW GRAVEL .BASIN T INDICATES INDICATES ATES EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN c i I I ELEVATION WEW- NTS NOTE ALL TRENCHES TO BE IiAtID DIG. {ND i(ACHI TRENCHING ALIpWED) m I t S1v�� E Pd G114 E Q: FR S; CIVIL ENGINEERS 1534 CAROB'LANE LOS ALMS, CA 94024 TEL: B50) 941 -6055 FAX: 650) 841 -8755, E -IIAU SMPENGINEERSO YAHOO.COM OWNei: COPVRIGNT C 2007 SMP ENCINITAS CIVIL ENGINEERS `n co z z ILZ g z z H V ..o W Q z LU 0 Q � p V IeNllonc ES N0. B2M p0, L/3 J'j p etc DECEMBER 5, 2007 we: w—d by V.G. Nocw by. S.R. ,b k 254.9 �b 2 OF 2 C_Z v i U I9' -d7• x II' -2• . WO sn FT. W -e• x W -e1 a ae ecl. rr. O —' 99' -2• x W -m' - 694 e(i. PT. n 99 Bdi Fr. O (4'-5' x 4' -b•.V2 . m Ki FT. Q 4' -5• - Il 8(i FT. 9e' -21 x D' -e• - Dtt ea Pr. I$T FLOOR PLAN O 21' -21 x W -91 a 206 8d1. FT. O 20'-W x 0' -Im' a 291 t3d'i. FT. 2ND FLOOR PLAN O I'-6' - 22 BO. FT. MEEMARIEASSOC., INC. 1p2�20�,1,,S�elatogx- Sunvyvele Rd. Suite D Saratoga, CA 95070 Tel: (408) 996 -1744 Fax: (408) 9961742 Tb. — dth —plme and gxdGmh— d ag b.,.ft t d to 0. e.d& dka7 w pepeedad pabHotim th—f ohe0 b. mryrmdy smiled to wA m. B••e4 e•Pmdxtiwor rjA= don byooymelhed, io wholb e.inpax, hpehmltcd. Tlao W tb. plm. aod imeim w18 h6emoieAroc.,ImJ ' DeugoorwId.mp di. vhuWr omm wharf —Flaw and d IW omedhaepime Sun o.idm orSe mmpmra crime: Mr. & Mrs. L,abio 19721 Parkview Coud Cupertbw. CA 95014 P-j- New Two Story House 15211 BevecmatM Saratoga, CA 95070 Client Revisions Nn. D"mVd= Dote l 0610606 2 06119106 3 06127106 4 07106x06 d 07/2&06 6 olvio 6 7 01"/07 e 1629107 9 10 11 12 City Revisions Nn Dempt m Ddb 1 Fhm®g C®ew. OLIOW 2 Fleming Coommb OS"107 3 ownm LLinga - IODI07 4 5 d 7 g Del.: 0819106 scale: tA'°3'-0- 13 w By: NN a.& Br. RN sb.et Tick Area Calculations Sbw Nn.: A -1 FOc:3:tBellaantW.hWwo�FIgV0 -29-07 3ob:BeueawR i SLOPE VMN5Mr CALCULATION; AREA . IM51 ACRES (45,184 SQ. FTJ AVERAGE SLOPE • I/A x %JM (I-) WHEN: I- I FEET (SLOPE INTERVAL) SUM) • 2,124 FEET (TOTAL LENGTH OF CONTOURS) AYERA40 SLOPE - 0j=215 x 2,124 x I liml AVERAGE SLOPE • re% EX MLMW� ILDDO AMEA TO BE DEMOLUMED X EXMNb MW TO Me MSWYM MCWTINS TWM To "MUN MEMARIEASSOC., INC. 12211 Rd Spiro D , S= - � T.408)99614 F=(408)99&1742 7'w use of that plrmndvmficidm"bomhcWtDdo V.dd.Wwftx.hlcbdwywea:p, dy.M. -O-a w dw pv lliea md mm w - i- With MeMade Anar, bcJ V---d-Wd-Mbd-ph--d of vmifica=b coritkft Prima swk ffwlmce offt mccwc-- Ell- Mr. & Mm. Labio 19721 Pakview Croat Cupertino, CA 95014 Bs wt New Two Story House 15211 Bellecourt Dr. Smatolp, CA 95070 Client Revisions N.. Dmrbd= DM WI%W 3 0627M6 4 07,O*ft 5 071MW 6 OIVLGU OM/M 1579M 10 11 City Revisions N. D--W- Dam I pbuftoampo wom 2 — phniftff OS/OM 3 o—cwm. 4 1 6 DaW: D— By. NU Cb.h.dBr. RK PmTid. Existing & Demo Site -P-Ia--n ShWN- A-2 IFim: - JAB.B.-VA.WO-ftl.- IT SLOPE DENSITY CALCULATION: AREA - IA751 ACRES (49184 SQ FT.) AVERAGE SLOPE - I/A x SLIM (L) WHERE I. 1 FEET (SLOPE INTERVAL) SUM(L) a 2,724 IeLT (TOTAL Li'_NmN OP CONTOUR„°) AVERAGE SLOPE — OAM2S x 2,124 x 1 18!51 AVERAGE SLOPE - 9.s% NEW 6' BLACT FM CB AIMM Eltl9TN2 6L "W* NEW 6' -m' WrWr W RCN FENCE AND GATE "IN LINK TREE MWTEGTIYE (£NC,Iwa id iii 1 CONTRACTOR SHALL TUNNEL UNDER ROOTS OF� TREES QI, 2S, 45 AND '14 PM DRAINAde WHERE DRAM LNES APO MlOPOSED UNDER TREE CANOMPB. NO ROOTS MEASURING 2 NCNES'OR LARGER SMALL DE CUT To INSTALL DRAINS. ROOTS MEASURING LESS THAN TWO NCHES MAIr DE CUT WITH A SHAD' PRLINNG TOOL, If SITM Narm L CM&MICI" SM MULL BE CCLOM DY W MADE FMM AT TM DI L Aroa PIi4 fIYY4, NT"WrfII�R�l1IM� T1f06N I XWAMM 3 A TRW CCMAMM 6IIALL BE MANIAM04 RM AT ALL TM ON 611E 918ai calf OOHfIME mu. W, @LOLL E! 1ealLMelr A'D FTJIa'D N cORANER 4. ALL COIrtIi1G71a1 VMM (MM 6aIAP6 AND OBBi P�IV6, CAH101 OIAW MINT)AS M4 a mm 66N TI! F'R7P'BE1Y LNE6QT1! NA NEAT AND 6AR f M I, TM MUM M L k*K A SOL40 MAKE IRat TIE Pq= 1NAT ttF1001�1f/W 1 11UCI1011A6"DWILLa @ t N1!O/, aFt% A ""W I@MOM A MMATIM Mr=M er TI! ="d6 FMOVOR OR D 1011-off ( W PRM ck M 60d N4lfTIdA 61141 f*PYDC A I'IS.D IO- Jr0il1 tN IIU1N1/ t61CN M14.L 67471 tIi L M BIIDM PAp W06 PR9`N® AIO OaTACTEp N BIF THE W L tiPM MD 6PIC14CATIM - L IM FM DArOt MD/M PM M=YATCTL CE FM A!D BCaff�L MAIM AND p AID APPIkAfD PL4N6 R- J6IM6W.11`COtl10RT TO }It 60L 0 T. ProoR ro FtN4 Cr7PEL7RTl foie ANr aulDEl -. oR aTRJCUIIe e A FRIL R oR W EN3F"COI P EW rA THE 601. NYE6t16A eN41 I4 A FNAL F63'OIR 6TA1Nf TFE CQ7q„EI ®114p. Fhl►aMTKxL FI66N AM AMOMATED KM MW OAWM rMLLY carts ro THE KAM 6PECHUTIC AID M,E6T16NICK d EX:AVATKN QRB ixaSCMl6 f iE$T T'PICNLY A 00&1 ALt DCAYA7f7N6 hllST t37IM7 T1D M4� rJr w eaue ere, �� � . I ALL liILGTNIC LNm, OfMilYCATCIL LNO6 AND APPIEOTBIMCM � N6TA1L® • G4N MO 1!1}13RM9i 6Y616'd, IIWL GE . IFDER(AgM. .. X ID45TNO TIES TO BE RIM 4ED OEXI4TM TIMM TO M-6m MEMARIEASSOC., INC. 12201 SetNOga- Sunnyvale Rd. Suite D Saratoga, CA 95070 Tel: (408) 996 -1744 Fes (408) 9961742 The MofftwOm ma cpedfic k m ahl0 bemhiamdm9w ax whieh They wen: pn�meand.Pmdwona be eapmlh 6mhadm achme. Reme,nymam7i ®. oc P- hBrae�bf- �'ex6�e4 mwbom ormprt, iep�md, ram mmeT�aoa vWvtemmw�m mmnamA eA-lm.,hd D.l�e�wla,mQl.am;e., I&Q arFl—e ithen� «mtlhme p}®afiae eridmwot6e aooeplaem went: Mr. & Mrs. L ablo 19721 Pad mw Cant CWmtino, CA 95014 New Two Story House 15211 BeRco u}tDr. SmIuM CA 95070 Client Revisions I City Revisions Dw= J16 sl I+rm4: Drawn BY Tw CWehed By: do Ot1LLDNt3 NEW 6' -m' WrWr W RCN FENCE AND GATE "IN LINK TREE MWTEGTIYE (£NC,Iwa id iii 1 CONTRACTOR SHALL TUNNEL UNDER ROOTS OF� TREES QI, 2S, 45 AND '14 PM DRAINAde WHERE DRAM LNES APO MlOPOSED UNDER TREE CANOMPB. NO ROOTS MEASURING 2 NCNES'OR LARGER SMALL DE CUT To INSTALL DRAINS. ROOTS MEASURING LESS THAN TWO NCHES MAIr DE CUT WITH A SHAD' PRLINNG TOOL, If SITM Narm L CM&MICI" SM MULL BE CCLOM DY W MADE FMM AT TM DI L Aroa PIi4 fIYY4, NT"WrfII�R�l1IM� T1f06N I XWAMM 3 A TRW CCMAMM 6IIALL BE MANIAM04 RM AT ALL TM ON 611E 918ai calf OOHfIME mu. W, @LOLL E! 1ealLMelr A'D FTJIa'D N cORANER 4. ALL COIrtIi1G71a1 VMM (MM 6aIAP6 AND OBBi P�IV6, CAH101 OIAW MINT)AS M4 a mm 66N TI! F'R7P'BE1Y LNE6QT1! NA NEAT AND 6AR f M I, TM MUM M L k*K A SOL40 MAKE IRat TIE Pq= 1NAT ttF1001�1f/W 1 11UCI1011A6"DWILLa @ t N1!O/, aFt% A ""W I@MOM A MMATIM Mr=M er TI! ="d6 FMOVOR OR D 1011-off ( W PRM ck M 60d N4lfTIdA 61141 f*PYDC A I'IS.D IO- Jr0il1 tN IIU1N1/ t61CN M14.L 67471 tIi L M BIIDM PAp W06 PR9`N® AIO OaTACTEp N BIF THE W L tiPM MD 6PIC14CATIM - L IM FM DArOt MD/M PM M=YATCTL CE FM A!D BCaff�L MAIM AND p AID APPIkAfD PL4N6 R- J6IM6W.11`COtl10RT TO }It 60L 0 T. ProoR ro FtN4 Cr7PEL7RTl foie ANr aulDEl -. oR aTRJCUIIe e A FRIL R oR W EN3F"COI P EW rA THE 601. NYE6t16A eN41 I4 A FNAL F63'OIR 6TA1Nf TFE CQ7q„EI ®114p. Fhl►aMTKxL FI66N AM AMOMATED KM MW OAWM rMLLY carts ro THE KAM 6PECHUTIC AID M,E6T16NICK d EX:AVATKN QRB ixaSCMl6 f iE$T T'PICNLY A 00&1 ALt DCAYA7f7N6 hllST t37IM7 T1D M4� rJr w eaue ere, �� � . I ALL liILGTNIC LNm, OfMilYCATCIL LNO6 AND APPIEOTBIMCM � N6TA1L® • G4N MO 1!1}13RM9i 6Y616'd, IIWL GE . IFDER(AgM. .. X ID45TNO TIES TO BE RIM 4ED OEXI4TM TIMM TO M-6m MEMARIEASSOC., INC. 12201 SetNOga- Sunnyvale Rd. Suite D Saratoga, CA 95070 Tel: (408) 996 -1744 Fes (408) 9961742 The MofftwOm ma cpedfic k m ahl0 bemhiamdm9w ax whieh They wen: pn�meand.Pmdwona be eapmlh 6mhadm achme. Reme,nymam7i ®. oc P- hBrae�bf- �'ex6�e4 mwbom ormprt, iep�md, ram mmeT�aoa vWvtemmw�m mmnamA eA-lm.,hd D.l�e�wla,mQl.am;e., I&Q arFl—e ithen� «mtlhme p}®afiae eridmwot6e aooeplaem went: Mr. & Mrs. L ablo 19721 Pad mw Cant CWmtino, CA 95014 New Two Story House 15211 BeRco u}tDr. SmIuM CA 95070 Client Revisions I City Revisions Dw= os 19ros se.m I+rm4: Drawn BY Tw CWehed By: RN sb.drw : New Site Plan sheet Na: A -3 P'to:r:�BeuacoQnwnbw- nr�,o -zvoT �ae:Benxmm ...- MEMARIEASSOC., INC. 12201 S—Wge SUMWvdld Rd. Suite D Sento9k CA 95070 Tel: (408) 996 -1744 FwL (408) 9961742 1'he uee ofdmeeplm md,peifc fi—dWl ee+emioeedto dm ePeoide dm ®c which dnlwme1 I I mdpdb irtoet wmd shell 6eupmuly0wi mmhme. Beme,teptodoetlmw ptbs bray IJnwhdoeeiopKiOj MI I TMIe w the pb- eed ReeldeaM me — wiffi bfmbe A.-- feo/ DedaeeewAMpgM- VIwdmWdwAd. —*. A tpeeibodlom dal —tkd prime woe E"M ofdo WNPODW aflhe mdri fi t ai= Mr. & Mrs. Labio 19721 Pazkview Court Cupertino, CA 95014 p.q= New Two Story House 15211 Bellecowt Dr. StMdtogd, CA 95070 Client Revisions No. De'mlpd9n Dde 1 0606p6 2 0619A6 3 06n7/06 4 07/0606 3 07IUM 6 Ow10/06 7 0S%w S 10!29/07 9 10 II 12 City Revisions Na Damipd® Dm 1 Pl®osCmmmn 021I0dr7 2 PI.-aw 05107/07 3 Owma O.Am 1029/07 4 3 6 7 8 lien: MOM Dmm By: NXF Cmdrod By. RN Shed75de: Basement Floor Plan Shat No.: A -4 FBo: J:\BeOo,u,&4, D—\FJd 110 -29-07 ]ob • • Z � � CsR4PHG SCALE (N FEET) I kch • 5 R 4 gait MEMARMASSOC., INC. 12201 SazeMga- Smnyvde Rd. Suite D Suwo^ CA 95070 Tel: (408) 996-1744 Fax: -(408) 996 -1742 Thee.e ofihw pane and.P a "beamtdemdtod. ftn be m p.M.11 ebyeaymelhed, ieaahebvbpen,bpm60detl. Title m the pl— -d pd nmbm aBhMemme Amec., ha:! Daeigov aalihwt paajah- Yaaalcmfktariffi tow pan end epaiBradoas ehe0 aooemmepdm ilmeavid®n afthe acoepltmro adthe red t— Qient Mr. & Mrs. Labio 19721 Parkview Court Cupertino, CA 95014 Project New Two Story House 15211 Rou«tomt Dr. Saratoga, CA 95070 Client Revisions No. Deb 1 06106tl6 2 06(19106 3 0647/06 4 01/0606 07l2fle6 6 08nom 7 OSm" 8 MOM 9 10 11 12 City Revisions Nn D.Mo m Dm 1 Ple®bg 0ommmb 02/104F7 2 Plmubg Cammwb 03/00/07 3 0waerCimga 1029107 4 S 6 7 8 Dd.: W19A6 3/1611'41• Dram By: NU Checked Bp. R9 Mh T0le: First Floor Plan ebnN.: A -S Fib: 7:iBe0ec.&U bW— V7g110.2W I lob:Belkmme 0 • D t f `I 1 MEMARIEASSOC., INC. 12201 SmatoBe4ungyvah: Rd. Suite D Samt*k CA 95070 Tel: (408) 9961744 Fax: (408) 9961742 The — of d—Pl —and apedfiadma ah'O he mmckd m the apeci&dte&Fwhkh#.Ywuap dpWkWm&md . ahaabeaTmaaly9mtkdmmehm Remgmpodmimar pabliee=bYmymdhod, inwhabwjnpaMtrpgah%ikd, Tale to the plum and apeddcWme -mzbm withMmvin Assoc, lncJ D'Ww'khamiarjndim Vlaaalamadwhhihaw*m and ofap aha0 c..tihde Vi— fideawd a(tha aanpuoca "Moe Mr. & Mrs. Labio 19721 Padmew Court Cupeaimo, CA 95014 New Two Story House 15211 Helltxouct Dr. Saratoga, CA 95070 1 Client Revisions 1 City Revisions 1 PLmkg Cc� 07/ItV07 2 1?Imdog Came, pyDypY Dam: 0811WO6 8rale: 116` r4- Ihnwn Jay: bw CLerW Dr.. RN Shc.1 Tdie: Second Floor Plan A -6 File: J:lBan.�....,ns wWwnlPlg�0.49-07 Job:9dkwm 1 I - --- ---- -- - -- ---------------------- LLLT it if III A:Y 11 LLLI 11111 11 IIIJ Ill PR PH If if Ill] It 73381' I „ I r 9 i`♦ � � fF � J 310 c1n ;� I _:I _;_T. .♦ - - `♦ i'q jpy a !1 209' 208' - - -. -- _- ____ __ _ �2vo 306'_________________ 7_ _ _ ______A _____ __ ____ Z 7pygp _____0 AVERAGE OF 1 I T r- 7 R- -1 ORAL GRADES Im'� !III! I 1111 ♦ 1 b I I I 9 II 1 11 1 1 1 I 1 1 4 111! I 1111 ` I j j I �1 1 11 1 I NEW GRADE J I j 1`♦ 1111 1111 //I I I 1 1 1 11 1 II 1 1 1 I i • 20691' I I I♦ IIII !m / 1 1 1 I I 11 1 I I I I UEfiT AVERAGE Oq NAlIRe1 G 2@8�.' . 20530' L=nae¢ilm,r� l I I I I 1 1=ir_____ y___________- r_ - -__- __.J__ I L_ -- _______ -_ HoRrH i __- _ __ -_- _ -LJ - - -- -- - - - - -- - -- r- z------------= - - - - -- — — FRONT ELEVATION ` I 9AST IEA6i II i II ELEVATIOP4 NOT S: {� L 3 MAT 1AV THICK 6111= OVER WN FfA6H 04 LATERB CF GRAPE 9 BLDG PAFM 2. CaCWTIE FLATTLE R" CL 3. PANTED MrAL wrreR A66 'A' II B O O A 4. 57= tlt:RF:7:D G.I. RA61 M AT ROM TO ___ @________- ______ ___________________. - CA9 ST01� lg6 . WLL - —�6 2 6. 6701E YEIEER 1 1I it If! 11 11111 n aFr REED fiPARC AI6ioR 3 q* EY r.4P �..,, IGH It II1TI1 WT N _LT Y IL 24 °x46° NCN R9LSCTIYE PK " COLOR t MATERIAL SP CIFIC TION: if p p FII7GF.FJAT5716L: R- AT11LE RLCF Y I Y Y I I:...:" TP C- •emery' --C $L AIR 4691 FT: GR4Y eROUN FWNGE 6TUXIM _ 7 mom,, TORTILLA gK41'19 -I GTas TA4TOWTAN UMW 211' _ ___________ ': ♦T z +`. __ _ / _ ;y ,, __ _ \ >-'• _ 6TgE', 6H46 210' �•% r --• _ TRIY G�TER: rtODTE TIC UI•IITE 1 � 210' t 1' ', 46 ACLU6 209'_ ' -_20B' y ff - - -2 @1- __- -- L: __.- _L _. - _' _4= l •-- -_ Ar- == 1 - - - - -- 20691' 2'- --- - - - - -- _ _ _ _____ I - -�6 06' AY'ER,AteE OF {7 L___ _ ______i____ __ __________S _ ' NATURAL GRADES ( I 1 1 rr -� - J I b Li I I _111 1 11 I // IAI tl0 ♦� I ♦♦ 1 I e 1 I II V Im nn IEUI GRADE j I l l I Ill I 11 1 I \' n0 0 11 11 -, 7 1� 1 I ♦ 191 110 r/ 1 I / I I - - -� E&6AR� II�INDOUIG AT DEGIROM I -- UF9T LM l------- ---- -- ---- L--- --- L-- --- L- - -- -'! MHKiRE RPM 1 , I � =-= = -- - - - - -- - - - -' OF BA6BffM � M i {' � LET ELEVATION' 1ER OeiaLE I�rfl, wc1E6 I PM r ' I I i I MEMARIEASSOC., INC. 12201 Setamga- SutmyvalePli sum Sarefn�, CA 95070 TeL (40B) 996.1744 Fwr: (408) 996.1742 n" — oftlxx plms and Ipeoifiotti®e A011,, [adAftd 1, the ryxi0c aim lhawhir316eyw¢epegared mdpaWicatl® dmmt eheO Ee egveoly lhelmdmsoehara Reme,ngRO6Wlm ar Inbliwtiaa bya�mvGod,mwhelemmpmSvryehml4d 790e m Poe lilma aad apsilmad®a imdry wldlhlmmie Aaaae„ IaJ Daaipr 'tllaullaajodiw. Vim! rnNad whL Wnapla,r and �`� amtltlom R®elhds awdmae o[Ihe alp Mr. & Ms. Ublo 19721 Pa*view Court Cupertino, CA 95014 N= Now Two Story House 15211 Be1lecolat Dr. $eratogp, CA 95070 Client Rmdone No. Darr+Ptlw ]let, 1 060606 2 - 06/19106 3 - 0603A7A,6 4 07/06-6 s 07fam 6 ON10A)6 7 03/69/07 fi loom 9 10 11 12 City R"isions Na nnv"m n.m 1 Plealhl3 Cemmmq 0211RN7 2 P� c— 05105V 3 O.mm cWPO 10'687 4 5 6 7 8 Dul¢ owlw 6 swe: Dawn By: Nrl C+healmd By: RN stpo m. Exterior Elevations A -7 File: l: 1Be0eom.&UW0— \PWO-2M lob:Belaoa,al .. • L 3 COAT IV THICK STUCCO 001E 04 LAYENB OF GRADE •D• PAI 2. CONCRETE RAT TILE R40 f 'A' 11 3. PANTMD MAL GVM!R 4. STUCCO SCFMD A B 13. GLL R.ASN81G AT ROOF TO 014LL S' CAST STOIC IN= SILT. ______ __ _____232BI'__ 1 IUjOPwmx1 I I I 1 I }�8 F ] Q STCNE MMR S. 4-mavW SPAWC ARRESTOR It IM il 1111­714ji 11 Ili! 1 3 la. W. C1401EY CAP IL 24' x 48' NON RERECTNE SKY -L�- �\ I COLOR E MATE IAL'SPI =CN ROOF KATERL4L cow_ r ru. F spa o+ EAGLE �L AIR 468'1 i aRAT p�ILIIN RNIy I. IY 8TlIOCG -IL T t�00gE', TORT iP „�..:;�• 204W 'ANOER4M, 640TOb -719 ?i:• STOle YEMMR -L_R16 rRlr d GUttIII: 1q-LLY h7ovl¢•, 48 A I ®® TOro206.01, F✓" - - -. ___________ ______ ______ _____- __________ 06 NAT PAL GP-4MS tl I I I I I LDCGRADE I I I I- IVGRADE I 1 i I I 1aE6T I EM WsENCY ESCAPE WINL!M AT v L--- -- --- -- 1-- --LOS OF ----- -- - ---j - - - - -- _ MplP arm ' ASA. R U T ELE VAT I ON MAMM SILL W*W ABOVE 114R I i 2i'rl gel MH" NET CLEAR OPERABLE 1110m; NOI r MMP'711 w MEAR OPERABLE tfxiari I A EAST 5.1 S a hT. 44 NCW6 20 WC E8 24 01C1E8 XMFM"EAsS0C,flVC. 12201 Smeboga- Snogyvale RiL Suite D Smatoga, CA 95070 Tch (408) 996-1744 Fes: (408) 996 -1742 The uae oltbewplme and gmificW=b66e raftla dmth. spxi8c rite firwlUch mey wen:pnp.d mdpobU,.d. —d WWI be exP,-b limibd m amh m0. home, tepododim or pubbcWm by wwme&od. to whole er in pwk hp chibbed. T10e m ISe plme and temdm w8h MemnieAox.IncJ I1ri�v wtmartpnJodiea ViemlombotwBh tWrpLn end aoegimmPd -hots oditee or@e nooepdme CTiaoC Mr. & Mrs. Lablo 19721 Pmkview Coact Cuperdw, CA 95014 PI,,1e,* New Two Story House 15211 Boucopmt Dr. Swatogh, CA 95070 Client Revisions k13'. DeKdpdon Dem 0606!06 06119/06 0621/06 4 07/0606 5 07/29M 6 08/10/06 7 05/M/01 8 1N24A7 9 10 11 12 City Revisions N. DeevW= Dm 1 Ph i sic IitII 0211OW 2 Pk.*Co®wb 09'0607 3 Oa C b.M 1029/07 4 S 6 1 8 DWe: 08119/06 1a�: 3/16• -1'C Rawn ny: 1Cx Cb.k.dlir. RN ShtaTak: Exterior Elevations hlheetxe.: A -8 Pile: J:�BelleoaaaWOhaOwnV98VaT9.0'/ ]ab:Belleoomt I ex ewaoe -� 210—­ _ — - -- _ vv 2618' - - -___ _ _ 200'______ _ 206'— — — 2D5' -- — SECTION A -A SECTION 8 -5 ------------------------ 29281' GWAM f __ ________ ______ — 29781'1 j 1� NQTULLL�CENZES — — 705' MEMAMIEASSOC., INC. 12201 Sertunp. Sunnyvale Rd. Suite D Saratoga, CA 95070 TaL• (409) 9961744 Fax (408) 996 -1742 7ta era of dmaph=and Vwlffcedoor ata0 he rstia0ed b Poe sped9e atk der xbieh Oxp wart przp dmdyotliwtim4aeof P.bNam.by or®md f.' m i. Pvt eprodaMmk err W d. Plim t9 m)meffiod, iawtale erm paa, u puoh@ tad. 71ea W lhapkm a- atwgw hma>eomlaa wOtMemnla Maao.2d Deaigoerwithadpujadia� VYud 000lect wOh Olele plena and of tLerextr�e� 000e8totap®a5oie o.Wmoe oflte eaeapl Cams Mr. & Mrs. Labio 19721 Parkview Court Cupertino, CA 95014 P.4.= New Two Story House 15211 Helleeou tD r. Seretoga, CA 95070 � Client Revisions No. Daadpdon pay 1 COMM 2 ON19m6 3 m 4 O?Mw I 07MM 6 08110M 7 o3m3m7 9 10291m 9 10 II 12 City Revisions Na Dm Wd- We 1 Pkodeg CaDmmb 07110147 2 Piomiog Cmmmn OSmJm7 3 0— Ch-s- Iw2m s �`. 6 ex ewaoe -� 210—­ _ — - -- _ vv 2618' - - -___ _ _ 200'______ _ 206'— — — 2D5' -- — SECTION A -A SECTION 8 -5 ------------------------ 29281' GWAM f __ ________ ______ — 29781'1 j 1� NQTULLL�CENZES — — 705' MEMAMIEASSOC., INC. 12201 Sertunp. Sunnyvale Rd. Suite D Saratoga, CA 95070 TaL• (409) 9961744 Fax (408) 996 -1742 7ta era of dmaph=and Vwlffcedoor ata0 he rstia0ed b Poe sped9e atk der xbieh Oxp wart przp dmdyotliwtim4aeof P.bNam.by or®md f.' m i. Pvt eprodaMmk err W d. Plim t9 m)meffiod, iawtale erm paa, u puoh@ tad. 71ea W lhapkm a- atwgw hma>eomlaa wOtMemnla Maao.2d Deaigoerwithadpujadia� VYud 000lect wOh Olele plena and of tLerextr�e� 000e8totap®a5oie o.Wmoe oflte eaeapl Cams Mr. & Mrs. Labio 19721 Parkview Court Cupertino, CA 95014 P.4.= New Two Story House 15211 Helleeou tD r. Seretoga, CA 95070 Client Revisions No. Daadpdon pay 1 COMM 2 ON19m6 3 Ofia m6 4 O?Mw I 07MM 6 08110M 7 o3m3m7 9 10291m 9 10 II 12 City Revisions Na Dm Wd- We 1 Pkodeg CaDmmb 07110147 2 Piomiog Cmmmn OSmJm7 3 0— Ch-s- Iw2m s 6 7 8 Dwc 0&1906 DrM HT• Hl aheet Tid.: Building Sections atea Nx.: A -9 Pik: l:�HaOeowrtVuohW woy+Ig�1D•29-07 lab:Belleoo,at 9 N • U SECTION C -C 73781' 381' AVERAGE OF hIGiURdL 6Rdt9E6 SECTION D -D itMEMARIEASSOC., LNG 12201 Smatop- Sumyvale Rd. Suite D Saratoga, CA 95070 TaL (408) 996-1744 Fm: (408) 9961742 . Tim of tbmplem and epamficade eha0 be rembetnd to tY apeeit3c ails for wbi b tbey waa I I and p Mea[m d..f eha0 be m,pre dy Sodtedto emh— same. F dacem- publial- byanymelhed mwbob min pnt vprvh0lSei TN. DDryaeedcr �m�wW�e-dpiJodin. VLoalmmeot wbad— plamaod of0eam'1 mvstipmepdmefideoridaosoftheaccepma Qicm ?A r. & Mrs. Labia 19721 Parkview Cart Cupenim, CA 95014 Project New Two Story House 15211 BellewtutDr. Saratoga, CA 95070 Client Revisions No. Daudgm net. ] Od06�06 2 0N19M6 3 06UTD6 4 07MM 5 0VAN 6 mom 7 OS 05M7 8 IMM 9 10 11 city Revisions No. Dmw4d= Da. I Plemioa Comwmn W10107 2 ph-bg CCa®mwmw t>"m 3 0—anew IQww 4 S 6 7 8 DWe: 09I19N6 Sae1.: 3136• -}!-V Dawn Br. Bi Gbrdmd By. RN shmrel.: Building Sections Shat No.: A -10 FIe: I:�BeOemmiVUO61Own1Plg11a29-07 ].b:BeBmomt AV 2PA 206 21. 2m. 20 I I > J I tr .r SECTION "E-E SECTION F -I= ------ 206BI' AVERAGE CF NATURAL GRADE5 MEMAMMEASSOC., INC. 12201 S�sMga- Sunnyvrle Rd. So6e D Sazazoga, CA 95070 Tel: (406) 996-17".(408)996-1742 3U oa ofboa plme and mshell heautothe a b. dire MteNch they gaepcepreA mdpuhliatlm thtn�f shellW bem�lheloedbprhwe. Beme, apuodoetkoa pnb6catim 1pmytocPoed ,bw6ebmin puRhprehlhhed Title b 0m pima and epeei0wdom tmeme wiPohltmdcMro9., h1e/ IMtigorwilhaotp�dio� Vr®slambara�mreplme and Behr p11�8 ®OridmW 011hO •empress Mr. & Mrs. 1Jabio 19,721 PmWuw Court Cupertino, CA 95014 Pmiae New Two Story House 15211 Belicamnt Dr. Smztoge, CA 95070 Client Revisions No. D. *d. Ilre 1 ONOW6 Od19Nfr 3 06l7AD6 4 07MM 5 07r W6 6 08+1046 7 OStlS(p7 S MOM 9 10 11 12 city Revisions N. DCM.Fft Drm 1 pi-mi- 80oammr wipm 2 Phmbec .m OWW7 3 O —Cxoin Mw 4 S 6 7 B Dt 0 &39/06 Soo: D.- Br. B3 chanted Br. IN Shat W. Building Sections Shat N0.: A -11 Prlo: I:1Be11aownUmh�Oxn�MgV0 -29-07 Iab:Balleoom - • rn 4 l u qwi ROOF CLOb6 W 3b /0 Not *OF CCLOW .Tyr wr OVER W AT P€WIETEB MEMARIEASSOC., INC. 12201 Smatdga-Smay9de Rd Sofro D Saratoga, CA 95070 Td: (403) 996 -1744 Fes: (408)996 -1742 The— offlmph- andapedfi.d mabanbcmWigedmar Ncdfic dte ft which dt' mac ptepsed and publimdoa &—f dell be mpmy 8m8ed m mdl a' e. Rms% upododw m pnbtiad® by ac7 meshed, ht wW. aria p k hpmhbM& 71W W the plum and R—fi- dam --fth Memm;e Mm, loo./ Drigurw;thwt p, jodioa VinWowna:twt0dwrplam and of the nemmdma enmaWme Pdam adoavidm9e oflhe aexpmm a;em Mr. & Mrs. Labio 19721 PadMew Court Cupertino, CA 95014 i?rojeet: New Two Story House 15211 Bellec0urt Dr. Saratoga, CA 95070 Client Revisions N. DelMW- pay 1 pyp6,D6 2 .. • 06f[9A6 3 MOM 4 07/OM S 07!1&06 6 08/1006 7 OSDyp7 8 tOf1947 9 to 11 City Revisions Na Daam@dm pay 1 Pkmd.B Cm—my 02/law 2 PI®yg Ceoommb 0dN5ID7 3 Owaer CLaega loam 4 3 L77 8 Ihde: 0819/06 scwe: 3 /16-.IW Drawn Br: NN C3cclmd BY: RN Sheet Title: Roof Plan Sbem No.: A -12 M-: 1 0.2W I lob:B.dideomt • REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Item 2 Application Nd./Location: MOD 07- 0003 /CUP08 -0001: 15400 Peach Hill Road Type of Application: Modification of Design Review Approval and Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Structure Located within the Rear Yard Setback. Owner /Applicant: = Rao and Sita Arimilli Staff Planner: Christopher A. Riordan, Senior Planner C� Meeting Date: February 13, 2008 APN: 517 -22 -072 Department Head 4,,7z- John F. Livingstone, AICP o ''x• e � �i � .� �-'�- ; Subject: 15400 Peach Hill Road APN: 517 -22 -072 t4a 4. 500'Radius N IS H I t 500' oaf . '• Mn i. _ °� .� \��65 `:� 5 +. ` `yj:— '� ,, •, '�; ^'may ry .max _ :-9l y ��nl _� _- �'" + 'o�i, •�sr �R_ e+l 15400 Peach Hill Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY: Application filed: 12/20/07 Application complete: 01/18/08 Notice published: 01/30/08 Mailing completed: 01/31/08 Posting completed: 02/07/08 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit and Modification of Design Review Approval to modify an approved application for Design Review by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2007. The original approval was for the construction of a new 6,699 square foot single - family dwelling. This approved project did not include rear yard landscaping. The home is currently under construction. Proposed modifications would include, 1) altering the layout of the driveway near the front entrance, 2) rear yard landscaping to include concrete patios, swimming pool, and pond, 3) the construction of an eight foot tall, 97 square foot Cabana, and the request for a Conditional Use Permit to locate the cabana within the rear yard setback, and 4) the removal of four ordinance sized Oak trees to accommodate the revised driveway location and the removal of one Eucalyptus tree for the construction of the cabana. The gross lot size is approximately 76,535 square feet and the site is located in the R -1- 40,000 zoning district. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve this Conditional Use Permit and Modification of Design Review Approval by adopting the attached resolution with conditions. Staff is not recommending any permanent conditions of approval. L C� C� • STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R -1- 40,000 GENERAL PLAN: RVLD (Very Low Density Residential) MEASURE G: Not applicable PARCEL SIZE: 76,535 square feet (gross) and 49,423 square feet (net — 28% reduction in lot area for slope adjustment) AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: Approximately 18.9% GRADING REQUIRED: 19586 CY of cut, 869 CY of fill, 717 CY of export for the construction of the residence, driveways, and landscaping (including the new pool, pool decking, and.the cabana) ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed modifications are Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single - family residences. MATERIALS AND COLORS: The cement used for the decking around the pool will have a "salt finish" and will be tan in color. The materials and colors for the cabana will match those used on the residence and will include precast stone columns, a stucco finished exterior, and exposed wood beams that are brown in color. Solar panels will be'installed on the roof of the cabana. PROJECT DATA R -1- 40,000 Zoning Approved Proposed Required Site Coverage Residence: 5,692 SF 5,692 SF Driveway and Parking: 5,783 SF 5,783 SF Walkways/Patio/Porches: 2,397 SF 2,397 SF Maximum Allowable = Pool/Pond/Pool Deck: 0 SF 2,956 SF 24,028 SF (35 %) Cabana 0 SF 759 SF TOTAL Site Coverage 13,872 SF 17,587 SF (.20) (25 %) Floor Area Residence: 6,699 SF 6,699 SF Maximum Allowable = Cabana OSF 97 SF* 6,820 SF TOTAL Floor Area 6,699 SF 6796 SF * The cabana includes a 9'/ square toot enclosed batnroom tnat is mcivaea m poor area. i ne reroamuer of the cabana is not enclosed and is not included in the calculation of floor area. Setbacks (Cabana) Rear Proposed , 15 Feet Required 6 Feet (for a 8 foot tall structure) Height (Cabana) 8 Feet Maximum Height= 514.5 (10 Feet) Lowest Elevation 501.5 Point: Highest Elevation 507.5 Point: Average Elevation 504.5 Point: .Proposed Topmost 512.5 (8 Feet tall) Point: PROJECT DISCUSSION City Code Section 16- 05.035(c)(2) requires modifications to plans approved by the Planning Commission to return to the Commission for review. Section 15- 80.030(d)(1) requires that an applicant file for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for placement of a cabana within the rear yard setback. Discussion of the cabana and the proposed modifications to the approved development plans are as follows: Rear Yard Landscaping The development plans which received Design Review Approval on October 10, 2007 did not include rear yard landscaping. Proposed landscaping will include the cabana as discussed below, a small putting green near the northeast corner of the residence, raised planters, a pool with an infinity edge, spa, and "tan" colored concrete pool decking. A. small pond and rock waterfall will be located to the right of the residence. Cabana The applicant is requesting a CUP to construct an eight foot tall cabana within the 50 -foot rear, yard setback. The cabana will be located approximately 15 -feet from the rear property line. As per Municipal Code Section 15- 80.030(d), accessory structures, such as cabanas, may be located within a rear setback if they are located no closer than six feet from a rear property line and do not exceed eight feet in height. One additional foot of height is allowed for each additional three feet of setback to a maximum height of ten feet if the structure is still located within the rear setback area. Outside, of a rear setback an accessory structure may be a maximum of 15 -feet tall. The cabana will cover an area of 759 square feet, will be open on three sides, and will be located in the southeast corner of the lot adjacent to the residence. The cabana will include. a 97 square foot restroom and is the only portion of the structure that is "enclosed" and considered to be floor area. The cabana will include a fireplace, gas BBQ, sink, and a small. refrigerator. The materials and colors of the cabana will match those of the residence. Photovoltaic (PV) solar panels installed on the roof of the cabana, in conjunction with the PV panels to be installed on the roof of the residence, will generate 19,344 kilowatt hours of • electricity per year (see Attachment 2) and will provide all of the electrical power for the residence. Construction of the cabana would result in the removal of one eucalyptus tree, discussed below, that the applicant previously intended to preserve. Front Yard Landscaping The project initially reviewed by the Planning Commission on August 8, 2007 included a request for a CUP for a Height Exception for the project to exceed the maximum height of 26 -feet. The Commission could not make the required findings to support the CUP and recommended that the mass and width of the residence be reduced and its maximum height lowered to 26 -feet. When the project was reviewed again and approved on October 10, 2007 its mass had been reduced by modifying its architectural style, the height was lowered to 26 -feet, and the width of the building footprint had been shortened. A cobblestone circular driveway providing vehicular access to the front entrance was included on the conceptual landscape plan approved by the Planning Commission. The layout of the driveway for the original design did not have an impact on existing trees. When the plans were revised and the building footprint shortened, the location of the front entrance was changed. The position of the front driveway on the approved site plan was not modified to correspond with the revised floor plan location of the entrance. However, the location of the driveway on the landscape plan was modified by shifting its location to the left to correspond to the new location of the entryway. This revised driveway, location will impact four ordinance sized Oak trees. According to the applicant's letter (Attachment 2), they were unaware of the impact to the trees caused by the new driveway location and only became cognizant of them when the landscape architect was finalizing the landscape design for the building permit submittal. The revised location would result in the removal of four Oak trees, as discussed below, that the applicant had previously intended to preserve. Trees Construction of the cabana will result in the removal of one 28" eucalyptus tree the applicant had previously intended to save. The City Arborist rated this tree ( #16 on the Arborist Report) as being in "good" condition with an appraised value of $16,300. The City Arborist determined that although the tree is a beautiful specimen, it is not native to the area, is known to have brittle limbs, requires frequent pruning, and can be considered a potential fire hazard in hillside locations. The arborist has agreed that the tree can be removed and replaced with trees of equal value. The realignment of the driveway would result in the removal of four oak trees ( #'s 10, 12- 13 on the Arborist Report) that the applicant had previously intended to save. The City Arborist has determined that these trees are either in fair to poor health or in crowded conditions and recommended that they can be removed. The total appraised value of these trees is $7,550. The City Arborist has agreed that these trees can be removed and replaced with trees of equal. value. Neighbor Review The applicant has shown the modified project plans and the design for the cabana to neighbors as indicated in the attached Neighbor Notification Forms (Attachment 3). No negative comments have been received at the time of the writing of this Staff Report. Geotechnical Clearance Geotechnical Clearance was granted for this project as required for the proposed pool. Design Review. Findings The proposed project is consistent with all the following Design Review Approval findings stated in City Code Section 15- 45.080: (a) Avoid unreasonable. interference with views and privacy. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the cabana will be limited in height to eight feet, setback 15 feet from the rear property line, and will be predominantly screened by the location of the main residence (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the site is'covered with grasses and trees. The construction of the cabana will include the removal of a 28" eucalyptus tree and the revised layout of the front driveway will include the removal of four small oak trees. Native replacement tree will be installed: The removal of these trees has been approved by the City Arborist. All other trees on site will be protected by fencing during construction. (c) Preserve Native, and Heritage Trees. This finding may be made in the affirmative in. that there are no heritage trees on the site. The realignment of the front driveway will cause the removal of four ordinance sized oak trees. The city arborist has determined that these trees are either in poor health or crowded by other trees and has recommended that they be removed and replaced with native trees with a value of $7,550.00. The eucalyptus tree to be removed is not a native tree. All other, trees on site will be protected by fencing during construction. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. This. finding may be made in the affirmative in that the perception of excessive bulk of the cabana will be reduced by.its proposed eight foot height, the roof will be flat, the design will be well detailed, and it will be open on three sides. (e) Compatible bulk and height.. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the proposed modifications do not change the home's compatibility of bulk and height with the surrounding homes. (f) Current grading and erosion control methods. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the applicant has submitted a grading and drainage plan, which incorporates appropriate grading and erosion control methods; and the proposal shall conform to the City's current grading and erosion control standards. (g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above. Conditional Use Permit Findings The proposed project is consistent with the following findings stated in SMC Section 15- 55.070 necessary to grant Use Permit approval to construct a cabana within the rear yard setback. (a) That the proposed location of the conditional use is in, accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the district. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that staff finds that the location of the proposed cabana within the rear yard setback to be a conditionally permitted use in the R -1- 40,000 zone residential district. (b) That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity: This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the cabana will meet requirements of Municipal Code Section 15- 80.030 (Special Rules for Accessory structures in Residential Districts). The materials and colors used for the cabana will -be compatible with the residence and will include stucco, precast concrete columns, and stone and will be muted to blend in to the natural surroundings of the site. The residence as well as the existing vegetation and proposed landscaping will screen the cabana as viewed froth Peach Hill Road. The cabana is conditioned to meet all requirements of the building department. (c) That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this chapter: This finding may be made in the affirmative in that staff finds that the location of the proposed cabana within the rear yard setback is a conditionally approved use within R -1- 40,000 residential zone district and it has been determined that the project is in compliance with all applicable development standards of Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15 -80 (Miscellaneous Regulations and Exceptions). General Plan Findings The proposed project is consistent with the following General Plan Policies: Conservation Element Policy 6.0 - Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. The proposed modifications will not create a significant visual impact to the rural atmosphere of Saratoga. The materials and colors used for the landscaping and cabana will be compatible with the residence. Materials will include stucco, precast concrete columns, and stone and will be muted to blend in to the natural surroundings of the site. The residence as well as the existing vegetation and proposed landscaping will screen the cabana as viewed from Peach Hill Road. Land Use Element Policy 5.0 — The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the proposed modifications meet the Findings required for Design Approval. .The landscaping and the cabana are in character with the design of the residence. The cabana will be well designed with detailed architectural features. Conclusion Staff finds that the Conditional Use Permit findings and the Design Review findings for the proposed modifications can be made in.the affirmative. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Modification of Design Review Approval MOD 07 -0003 and CUP08 -0001 with conditions by adopting the attached resolution. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution of Approval 2. Applicant's project description letter. 3.- Neighbor review letters. 4. Affidavit of mailing notices, public hearing notice, copy of mailing labels for project notification, and proof of newspaper noticing. 5. Arborist report dated June 18, 2007 and January 23, 2008 6. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A." • Attachment 1 C APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. Application Number MOD 07 -0003 and CUP08 -0001 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Arimilli —15400 Peach Hill Road Modification of Design Review Approval for Landscape Changes and Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Structure Located within the Rear Yard Setback. WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Modification of Design Review Approval and Condition Use Permit for landscape modifications to an approved plan for the property located at 15400 Peach Hill Road. The lot is situated in the R -1- 40,000 zoning district; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard'and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, the project, which proposes to modify a previously approved application and . construct a cabana within the rear yard setback is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality. Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or .Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This Class 3 exemption applies to construction of a single family home in an urbanized area; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Modification of the October 10, 2007 Design Review Approval based on the following findings specified in City Code Section 15- 45.080: (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. This finding may be -made in the affirmative.in that the cabana will be limited in height to eight feet, setback 15 feet from the rear property line, and will be predominantly screened by the location of the main residence. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the site is covered with, grasses and trees. The construction of the cabana will include-the removal of a 28" eucalyptus tree and the revised layout of the front driveway will include the removal of four small oak trees. Native replacement tree will be installed. The removal of these trees has been approved by the City Arborist. All other trees on site will be protected by fencing during construction. • (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. This finding. may be made in the affirmative in that there are no heritage trees on the site. The realignment of the front driveway will cause the removal of four ordinance sized oak trees. The city arborist has determined that these trees are either in poor health or crowded by other trees and has recommended that they be removed and replaced with native trees with a value of $7,550.00. The eucalyptus tree to be removed is not a native tree and is to be replaced with native trees with a value of $16,300. All other trees on site will be protected by fencing during construction. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the perception of excessive bulk of the cabana will be reduced by its proposed eight foot height, the roof will be flat, the design will be well detailed, and it will be open on three sides. (e) Compatible bulk and height. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the proposed modifications do not change the home's compatibility of bulk and height with the surrounding homes. (f) Current grading and erosion control methods. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the applicant has submitted a grading and drainage plan, which incorporates appropriate grading and erosion control methods; and the proposal shall conform to the City's current grading and erosion control standards. (g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views as detailed in the findings above. WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Conditional Use Permit Approval based on the following findings specified in City Code Section 15- 55.070: (a) That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of. the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the district.—This finding may be made in the affirmative in that staff finds that the location of the proposed cabana within the rear yard setback to be a conditionally permitted use in the R -1- 40,000 zone residential district. (b) That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity: This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the cabana will meet requirements of Municipal Code Section 15- 80.030 . (Special Rules for Accessory structures in Residential Districts). The materials and colors used for the cabana will be compatible with the residence and will include stucco, precast concrete columns, and stone and will be muted to blend in to the natural surroundings of the site.. The residence and existing and proposed landscaping will screen the cabana as viewed from Peach Hill Road. The cabana is conditioned to meet all requirements of the building department. (d) That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this chapter: This finding may be made in the affirmative in that staff finds that the proposed cabana within the rear yard setback is a conditionally approved use within R -1- 40,000 residential zone district and it has been determined that the project is in compliance with all applicable development standards of Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15 -80 (Miscellaneous Regulations and Exceptions). WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Modification of the October 10, 2007 Design Review Approval and Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a cabana within the rear yard setback based on the following findings of consistency with the City General Plan: (a) Conservation Element Policy 6.0 - Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. The proposed modifications will not create a significant visual impact to the rural atmosphere of Saratoga. The materials and colors used for the. landscaping and cabana will be compatible with the residence. Materials will include stucco, precast concrete columns, and stone and will be muted to blend in to the natural surroundings of the site. The residence and existing and proposed landscaping will screen the cabana as viewed from Peach Hill Road. (b) Land Use Element Policy 5.0 — The City shall use the design review process to assure" that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and :the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the proposed modifications .meet the Findings required for.Design Approval. The landscaping and the cabana are in character with the design of the residence. The cabana will be well designed with detailed architectural- features. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does, hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the application, site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the exemption from CEQA is approved, the requisite findings are made, and application number MOD 07- 0003 /CUP08 -0001: for Modification of the Design Review Approval granted October 10, 2007 by Planning -Commission Resolution Number 07 -071 and Conditional Use. Permit approval is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: R PERMANENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL There are no permanent conditions of approval for this project. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. The cabana and landscaping shall be constructed as shown on the plans stamped as Exhibit "A" and date- stamped January 21, 2008, hereby incorporated by reference. 2. A storm water retention plan indicating how all storm water will be retained on -site, and incorporating the New Development and Construction Best Management Practices, shall be submitted along with the complete construction drawings. The applicant shall install a drainage mechanism (drain inlets /catch basins underneath the existing driveway near the north boundary of the property) to retain all stormwater runoff on site by capturing such stormwater and/or diverting it away from adjacent property. 3. Four sets of complete construction plans incorporating this signed Resolution and Arborist Reports for this project dated June 18, 2007 and January 23, 2008, shall be included on the plans submitted to the Building Division for permit plan check review. 4. Final landscape, irrigation and utility plans shall be incorporated into the construction plan set and shall take into account the following requirements: • Landscape plan shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce; runoff, promote surface infiltration and minimize use of fertilizers and pesticides that can contribute to water pollution. • Landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolonged exposure to water shall be specified. • Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. • Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. • Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. • A note shall be included on the site plan stating that no construction equipment or- private vehicles shall park or be stored within the dripline of any ordinance protected trees on the site. 5. Front yard landscaping shall be installed prior to final occupancy inspection. 6. Any changes to the approved plans must be submitted in writing with a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. ' Proposed changes to the approved plans are subject to the approval of the City pursuant to the procedures then applicable under the City Code. 7. The site plan shall contain a note with the following language: "Prior to foundation inspection bythe City, the Licensed Land Surveyor of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per the approved plans." 8. All processing fees, in the form of deposit accounts on file with the community development department, shall be reconciled with a minimum $500 surplus balance at all times. In the event that the balance is less than $500, all staff work on the project shall cease until the balance is restored to a minimum of $500. CITY ARBORIST 9. All recommendations contained in the City Arborist Reports dated June 18, 2007 and January 23, 2008 shall be followed: 10. Tree protective measures, as specified by the City Arborist, shall be installed and inspected by Staff prior to issuance of City Permits. 11. Prior to issuance of .City Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City, in a form acceptable to the Community Development Director, security equivalent to 100% of the total appraised value of trees to be retained to guarantee the maintenance -and .preservation of trees. 12-The City Arborist shall inspect the site to verify compliance with tree protective measures: The. security shall be released after the planting of required replacement trees, a - favorable site inspection by the City Arborist, and payment of any outstanding Arborist fees. GEOTECHNI CALCLEARANCE hall review and approv 13. The Project Geotechnical Engineer se all geotechnical aspects of the final development plans (i.e., site preparation and grading, site drainage improvements and design parameters for building foundations, and driveways) to ensure that the plans, specifications and details accurately reflect the consultants' recommendations. Specifically, the Consultant shall consider the following: • For compliance with the Uniform Building Code, consideration shall be given to minimum 15 -inch wide foundation footings. Consideration shall be given to utilization of minimum two #5 bars (top and bottom) in foundation footings. ■ Groundwater fluctuations could occur at the site with potential impacts to the proposed basement. The Consultant shall consider the use of an axial sub -drain beneath the proposed basement floor to mitigate shallow groundwater. ■ The Consultant shall also evaluate the location and design of the proposed energy dissipaters with respect to slope stability and erosion impacts. The results of the plan review shall be summarized by the Project Geotechnical Engineer in a letter(s) and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of permits. 14. The Project Geotechnical Engineer shall inspect, test (as needed), and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project construction. The inspections shall include, but not necessarily be limited to: site preparation and grading, site surface and subsurface drainage improvements, and excavations for fill keyways, and foundation construction prior to placement of fill, steel and concrete. The results of these inspections and the as -built conditions of the project shall be described by the geotechnical consultant in a letter(s) and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to Final Project Approval. 15. The owner (applicant) shall pay any outstanding fees associated with the City Geotechnical Consultant's review of the project prior to project Zone Clearance. 16. The owner (applicant) shall enter into agreement holding the City of Saratoga . harmless from any claims or liabilities caused by or arising out of soil or slope instability, slides, slope failure or other soil related and/or erosion related conditions. FIRE DEPARTMENT 17. The applicant shall comply with all Fire Department conditions. CITY ATTORNEY 18. Applicant agrees to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging any of the City's actions or proceedings with respect to the applicant's project. Section 2. Construction must commence within thirty -six (36) months or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15 -90 of the Saratoga City Code, this resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission. State of California, the 13th day of February 2008 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOYCE HLAVA CHAIR, PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: JOHN F. LIVINGSTONE, AiCP SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission.. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date • • Attachment 2 • Open Letter to the Saratoga Planning Department & Commissioners From: Rao and Sita Arimilli 4 JAN 31 ""UUO Jan 31, 2008 CITY Or COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN i Re: 15400 Peach Hill Road, APN 517 -22 -072; Landscape Plan Dear Commission Members & Staff, We are writing this letter informing you of the Landscape Plan. After receiving approval for our main home, we met with our Landscape architect (Doug Koch)'and Solar Power Engineering Company (Cobalt Power Systems Inc.) to review our landscaping and solar power requirements. The following are the key items of the landscape plan: 1. Backyard Pool. a. Within the setback limits and compliant with all the pool related regulations b.- Pool heated using solar water heating 2. Backyard Cabana and bath room a. Unenclosed garden structure. Within the setback limits b. Solar power generation i. Cabana roof was identified as the perfect location (facing south and flat roof) for installing PV solar panels. Forty PV Solar panels will be installed on the roof of the cabana structure. Additional panels will be installed on main roof. ii. Specifications are as follows 1. KWH Produced per Yr. Avg. 19,344 ( eneratmg of our power requirements) 2. �COPrevented {Tos/2SYrs 273: c... One tree is impacted by the location of the Cabana 3. Trees impacted by front driveway a. Driveway was moved when the new house plan was submitted to match the updated layout. The new plan and driveway were shown on the landscape plan that was approved by the planning commission. Our landscape architect identified 5 trees that were impacted when he was finalizing the details (an oversight on our part). We approached city arborist Kate Bear with this information. Kate after site visit reported the suitability for preservation of these trees as moderate to low and therefore acceptable to remove, these trees. b. We will _replace these trees ,r►th heal h O ktrees. Our current plans include planting of c. We would like to apologize for not identifying these trees during the house design review. We are requesting approval for these items to implement our landscape plan. As you may have noticed, we are implementing a very ambitious Solar Power generation facility. We are hoping that this will contribute in .a big way to our environment. In addition, we are currently actively pursuing water conservation plans. We would like to apologize for not submitting these items in the original plan. Our understanding was that the details of the landscape plan could be submitted independent of the main house. So please treat this as genuine misunderstanding. Sincerely Rao & Sita Arimilli (Jan 31, 2008) • i • • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 15 4—D t7 ?C-_,A 6-k t LL O A t7 Dear Neighbor, " L,A'riD5CAPE Pt-At-,) " CPooc, , �► gksv�t J I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard Ciry Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: Date: l r t © 8 Signature: 2cCl .0 ' Neighbor Address: C--A Neighbor Phone #: $ Z "( (a If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Application Number: City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 Date: Planning Department City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: l 5`�D � , �1✓�LI -F Ti l LG �k� , ����O�iA Dear Neighbor, LAN P 5G/kP E _ (POOL, aA 66w - I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice. which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be .changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name:1j Signature: is t/f Y . J..�j r C. Date: t16 Neighbor. Address: Neighbor Phone #: �Yeu s � If I have any initial concerns-with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following .(please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Application Number: Date: City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 1012 4106 • 17J PJ City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: S¢b6 Pe Ac-t+ 1 L t_ �D��� �5AA-A --ro &), Dear Neighbor, L —AtvDS GetPE P L-A-N CPV.VL I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: �o � 'VNO L y `J Date: ill /% C Signature: ), /i % -1Z, i Neighbor A � ss: p j c S t,k c 1) SU �� Neighbor Phone #: 3 -s % o, GG�� If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Application Number: City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 Date: Planning Department City of Saratoga Neighbor �Notification Form . o t {' G A CH- fi t i-z- P iP AP rC> &? t. ��IZA- PROJECT ADDRESS. � S �-D _ , Dear Neighbor, �� L IF��S �E 1 �1i1� l t C tPOnL G� Q�i�Vfi I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to . review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the 'neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being.made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: '�✓ C�� Date: Signature: Neighbor Address: Neighbor Phone If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Date:_ Application Number: City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 Planning Department • r City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 5 'I LL ILA, 54AA -rV hA Dear Neighbor, c t P E- Ropw n J v v L , CAs A- -90 I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further, interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name YfIq ��' k� ? Ll`i1i A/6- Date: /- Signature: i CT Neighbor Address: 115415i 11461t % Neighbor Phone #: We — 9 67— 7 b 5 I �o JC cc), If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: 0 Application Number: City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 Date: Planning Department Attachment 4 rm CITY OF SARATOGA Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 (408) 868 -1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Saratoga's Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on: Wednesday, the 13 day of February, 2008, at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Theater located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. The public hearing agenda item is stated below. Details of this item are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. — 5:00 p.m: Please consult the City website at www.saratoga.ca.us regarding Friday office closures. APPLICATION /ADDRESS: MOD 07- 0003 /CUP08 -0001/ 15400 Peach Hill Drive APPLICANT /OWNER: Rao and Sita Arimilli APN: 517 -22 -072 DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit and Modification of Design Review Approval to modify an approved application for Design Review by the. Planning Commission on October 10, 2007. This original approval was for the construction of a new 6,699 square foot single - family dwelling. This approved project did not include rear yard landscaping. The home is currently under construction. The Conditional Use Permit is for the construction of 'an eight foot tall, 97 square foot Cabana to be located within the rear yard setback. Proposed modifications to the original approval include, 1) altering the layout of the driveway proposed near the front entrance to avoid conflict with existing water meters, 2) rear yard landscaping to include concrete patios, swimming pool, and pond, and 3) the removal of four ordinance sized Oak trees to accommodate the revised driveway location and the removal of one Eucalyptus for the construction of the cabana. The gross lot size is approximately 76,535 square feet and the site is located in the R -1- 40,000 zoning district. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a Public Hearing in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing. In order for information to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed on or before Thursday, February 7, 2008. This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor's office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out -of -date information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all residents potentially affected by a project. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Christopher Alan Riordan, AICP Senior Planner (408) 868 -1235 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES • I, Denise Kaspar , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the 31St day of January 2008, that I deposited 31 notices in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to -wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15- 45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property described as: Address: 15400 Peach Hill Road AP N : 517 -22 -072 that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. • Denise Kaspar r Advanced Listing Services C • January 31, 2008 500' .Ownership Listing Prepared For: 517 -22 -072 MARY MCCANDLESS 15400 PEACH HILL DRIVE SARATOGA CA 95070 510 -02 -017 510 -02 -024 MARION C & JOHN CONNOLLY LESTER G SACHS Or Current Owner Or Current Owner 15405 HUME DR 19941 SUNSET DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -6416 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6438 510 -52 -004 510 -52 -005 DAVID A & JOAN DRENNAN M & M BANNICK Or Current Owner Or Current Owner 15365 HUME DR 15387 HUME DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -6416 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6416 510 -52 -007, 008 'PARK FAMILY TRUST Or Current Owner 15269 HUME DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -6415 517 -22 -041 GARY E & LANAYA DIX Or Current Owner 15404 MADRONE HILL RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6401. 510 -52 -009, 10 MICHAEL S PLINER Or Current Owner 15257 HUME DR. SARATOGA CA 95070 -6415 517 -22 -055 S & CAROLE HORINE Or Current Owner 15250 PEACH HILL RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6448 517 -22 -070 517 -22- 071,071 SARITA K JOHNSON MARY MCCANDLESS Or Current Owner 16326 RIDGECREST AVE 15277 PEACH HILL RD MONTE SERENO CA 95030 -4140 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6469 . 517 -22 -078 517 -22 -079 JOHN & CAROL GIANNANDREA FREDERICK S & SHARON ANDRES Or Current Owner Or Current Owner 15363 PEACH HILL RD 15255 PEACH HILL RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6402 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6469 517 -22 -088 517 -22 -099 WILLIAM J & BARBARA ELFVING THOMAS C & JUDITH LAVEY Or Current Owner Or Current Owner 15451 PEACH HILL RD 15375 PEACH HILL RD SARATOGA CA 95070 =6402 SARATOGA CA 95070 -6402 510 -02 -025 CHAIHO & TAEOCK KIM Or Current Owner 19977 SUNSET DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -6438 510 -52 -006 DAVID A & SHEILA BROWN Or Current Owner 15391 HUME DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -6416 517 -22 -024 DAVID WHITNEY Or Current Owner 15374 MADRONE HILL RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6401 517 -22 -068 CHARLES J & ROMONA BROOKS Or Current Owner 15355 PEACH HILL RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6402 517 -22 -074 DARRELL E & ANGELIN DUKES Or Current Owner 15329 PEACH HILL RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6402 517 -22 -087 ROBERT L & PATRICIA DALE Or Current Owner 15419 PEACH HILL RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6402 517 -22 -100 MEHDI AMINI -RAD Or Current Owner 15397 PEACH HILL RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6402 517 -22 -112 517 -22 -121 [QBA L HUSAIN -111 DAVID J & TERESA CAREY QBA Or Current Owner TERESA R &DAVID CAREY 20140 MENDELSOHN LN 15 Cu PEACH HILL RD 15320 PEACH HILL RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -5904 SARATOGA 20 PEAL H LL RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6448 • • 517 -22 -122 CLYDE R WALLIN Or Current Owner 1 *EACH HILL RD S OGA CA 95070 -6448 517 -23 -022 RICHARD A & DEBRA BELGARD Or Current Owner 15571 PEACH HILL RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6472 CITY OF SARATOGA ATTN: Christopher Riordan 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE SARATOGA CA 95070 • 517 -23 -001 YUPAN WEN Or Current Owner 15481 PEACH HILL RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -6402 517 -38 -002, 004 W L PELIO 14573 BIG BASIN WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -6801 517 -23 -021 IQBAL HUSAIN 20140 MENDELSOHN LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -5904 Advanced Listing Services P.O Box 2593 Dana Point CA 92624 Legal,AdveptisingC�ftblicfttices expire before four months tion or account as provided - in section 1250 of the General California Probate Code. A from the hearing date Request for Special Notice Notices form is available from the YOU ARE IN DEFAULT court clerk. noticed above. Attorney for petitioner: NOTICE OF PETITION TO CHARLES G. STEPHENSON (BAR NO. 035516) ADMINISTER ESTATE OF ROBERT L CHAMBERS aka 235 MONTGOMERY STREET, ROBERT LEROY CHAMBERS SUITE 1035 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 CASE NO. 1-08-PR-162592 415- 705.5300 To all heirs, beneficiaries, (Pub SN 1/23,1130,2/6) creditors,. contingent credi- described in this notice, or in tors, and persons who may 3RD AMENDED otherwise be interested in NOTICE OF PETITION TO the will or estate, or both of ADMINISTER ESTATE OF ROBERT L. CHAMBERS aka ALFRED JOSEPH MERNONE ROBERT LEROY CHAMBERS aka ALFRED J. MERNONE A PETITION has been filed by CASE NO. 1.08-PR-161970 JAMES H. CHAMBERS in the To all heirs, beneficiaries, Superior Court of California, creditors, contingent credi - County of Santa Clara. tors, and persons who may THE PETITION requests that otherwise be interested in JAMES H. CHAMBERS be the will or estate, or both of. appointed as personal repre- ALFRED JOSEPH MERNONE sentative to administer the aka ALFRED I. MERNONE estate of the decedent. A PETITION has been filed by THE PETITION requests the KEVIN MERNONE AND decedent's WILL and codi• GLENN MERNONE in the .its. if any, be admitted to Superior Court of California, probate. The will and any County of Santa Clara. codicils are available for _ THE PETITION requests that examination in the file kept KEVIN MERNONE AND by the court. THE PETITION requests GLENN MERNONE be appointed as personal repre - authority to administer the estate under the sentative to administer the Independent Administration estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests the sf Estates Act. (This author- decedent's WILL and codi -� ty will allow the personal cils, if any, be admitted to -epresentatt u take many actions without t obtainin g probate. The will and any :ourt approval. Before tak• codicils are available for ex examination in the file kept Fig certain very important the court. - tclions, however, the per• tonal representative willbe THE PETITION requests • equired to give notice to authority to administer the estate under. the n persons unless :heey y have ave waived notice or Inde ""lent Administration P : onsented to the proposed of Estates Act. (This author - ity will allow the personal tction.) The independent administration authority will representative to take many )e granted unless an inter- actions without obtaining court approval. Before tak- asled person files an objet- :ion to the petition and mg certain very important ;hows good cause. why the actions, however, the per :ourt should not grant the sonal representative will be authority. required to give notice to 1 HEARING on the petition interested persons unless Nill be held on FEBRUARY they have.waived notice or 14, 2008, 9:00 a.m. in Dept. consented to the proposed 15 located at 191 North first ; action.) The independent it., San Jose, CA 95113. administration authority will F YOU OBJECT to the granti- be granted unless an inter• ig of the petition, you ested person files an objec- ;hould appear at the hearing tion to the petition and and state your objections or shows good cause why the ile written objections with court should not grant the he court before the hearing. authority. lour appearance may be in A HEARING the petition zerson or by your attorney. d on FEBRUARY F YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a 2008, 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 15 ' ontingent creditor of the located at 191 North First St., )eceased, you must rite your San lose, CA 95113. :laim with the court and mail IF YOU OBJECT to the granti•. i copy to the personal repre• ng of the petition, you ;entative appointed by should appear at the hearing court within four months and state your objections or .he 'rom the date of first file written objections with . ssuance of letters as provid• the court before the hearing. �d in - section 9100 of the Your appearance may be in : alifornia Probate Code. The person or by your attorney. line for filing claims will not IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a :xpire before four months contingent creditor of the rom the hearing date deceased, you must file your noticed above. claim with the court and mail (0U MAY EXAMINE the file a copy to the personal repre - ;ept by the court. If you are sentative appointed by the a person interested in the court within four months !state, you may file with the from the date of First :ourt a formal Request for issuance of letters as provid•. ;peciat Notice of the filing of ed in section 9100 of the in inventory and appraisal of California Probate Code. The istate assets or of any peti- time for filing claims will not expire before four months court, you may be limited to Saratoga Municipal Code approved by the Planning NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE expressed or implied, from the hearing date raising only those issues you Section 15. 45.060. Commission on)uly 11, 20OZ YOU ARE IN DEFAULT regarding title, possession, noticed above. or someone else raised at APPLICATION # The proposal includes UNDER A DEED OF or encumbrances, to pay YOU MAY EXAMINE the file the public. hearing(s) CUP07.0001 (386.14 -016) demolition 0f the existing TRUST, DATED 10/25/2005 the remaining principal sum kept by the court. If you are described in this notice, or in Metro PCS, 12768 Saratoga 2,364 sq. ft. residence. The UNLESS YOU TAKE ACTION of the note(s) secured by a interested in the written correspondence Avenue. - The applicant is maximum proposed impervi- TO PROTECT YOUR PROPER- said Deed of Trust, with .person estate, you may file with the delivered to the Saratoga requesting Conditional Use GUS coverage is 35% of the TY, IT MAY BE SOLD AT A interest thereon, as provided court a Formal Request for Planning Commission at, or Permit approval to locate a site. The maximum height of PUBLIC SALE. IF YOU NEED in said note(s), advances, Special Notice of the filing of prior lo, the public hearing. wireless facility at the the proposed buildings is 26 AN EXPLANATION OF THE under the terms of said an inventory and appraisal of In order to be included in the Presbyterian Church near the feet. The lot size is 45,784 NATURE OF THE PROCEED- Deed of Trust, fees, charges estate assets or of any peti- Planning Commission's infor- intersection of Cox Avenue square feet, and the site is ING AGAINST YOU, YOU and expenses of the tion or account as provided mation packets, written and Saratoga Avenue. The zoned RI. 40,000. SHOULD CONTACT A Trustee and of the trusts in section 1250 of the communications should be project consists of a new (Pub SN 1/30) LAWYER. created by said Deed of California Probate Code. A filed on or before the cross structure with con- WEST VALLEY - MISSION On 2/5/2008 at 10:00 AM Trust. The total amount Request for Special Notice Tuesday, a week before the cealed antennas and a new COMMUNITY COLLEGE First American Loanstar of the unpaid balance of the form is available from the meeting. equipment cabinet enclosed Trustee Services, as duly obligation secured by the court clerk. Asite visit will be held on the in 'a shed. The lot size is DISTRICT NOTICE appointed Trustee under and property to be sold and Attorney for petitioner: day preceding the hearing approximately . 3.74 acres At the Special Board Meeting pursuant to Deed of Trust reasonable estimated costs, MATTHEW A. CROSBY, date listed above as part of and the site is zoned R -1- held on Wednesday, January 23, 2008, the West Valley. recorded 11/0212005, as expenses . and advances CSB #070524 2785 PARK AVENUE the standard Site Visit Committee agenda. Site vis- 10,000. APPLICATION # Mission Community College Instrument No. 18654600, in book , page , of Official at the time of the initial publication of the Notice of SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 its occur between 3:30 and MOD07.0003, CUPOB -0001 District Board of Trustees appointed Mr. Records in the office of the Sale is 41,040,607.91 408. 370.7500 5:00 p.m. The site visit is (517- 22 -072) Arimilli, 15400 provisionally Wade Ellis to fill the vacancy County Recorder of Santa Clara County, State of The beneficiary under said Deed of Trust (Pub SN 1/23,1/30, 2/6) open to the public. The Site Visit Committee will convene Peach Hill Road: - The appli- cant requests a Conditional left by the passing of Trustee California. Executed by: heretofore executed and at the City Hall parking lot at Use Permit for the construc- Don Cordero on December 9, 2007. The be filled Mary L. Girardol, will sell at delivered to the undersigned 3:30 p.m. on the day preced- lion of an eight Foot tall, 97 seat will public auction to highest a written. Declaration of ✓%t City y ing the hearing and visit the site listed above and may square feet Cabana within the rear yard setback and permanently in the next gen- eral election In November bidder for cash, cashier's check /cash equivalent or. Default and Demand for Sale, and a written Notice Lego S visit other sites as well. For modifications to an 2008• other form of payment of Default and Election to more, information please approved Design Review Unless a petition calling for a authorized by 2924h(b), Sell. con the Community application. Modifications special election, containing ng a (payable at time of .sale The undersigned caused ' NOTICE OF HEARING Development Department at includes 1) altering the lay- sufficient number of sign- tures; is filed with the coun- in lawful money of the United States) At the said Notice of Default and Election to sell to be BEFORE PLANNING COMMISSION 408 868.1222 or review the Site Visit Agenda on the out of the driveway near the front entrance to avoid con- ty superintendent of schools entrance to the Superior recorded in the County CITY OF SARATOGA'S City Website at www.sarato- flict with existing water . within 30 days of the provi- sional appointment, it shall Courthouse, 190 N. Market where the real property is located. PLANNING COMMISSION announces the following ga.ca.us. APPLICATION # - meters, 2) proposed rear yard landscaping to include become an effective appoint- St., San Jose, CA All right, title and interest conveyed Date: 1/16/2008 _ public hearings on ADR07 -0022 (393.38 -007) concrete patios, swimming ment. I (Pursuant to Education to and now held by it First American Wednesday, the 13th day of February 2008 at 7:00 p.m. Bijan /Sangam,13574 Howen Drive - The applicant pool, and pond, 3) construc- tion of the cabana, and 4) Codes 5091 and 5092) under said Deed of Trust in the property situated Title Insurance Company First American Loanstar in the City Council Chambers requests Design Review the removal of five trees For further information, in said County and State Trustee Services located at 13777 Fruitvale approval to demolish the (including three Oak trees) contact West Vatley- Mission Community College District described as: As more fully described in the above 3 First American Way Santa Ana, CA 92707 Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Details and plans are avail- - existing second floor of the approximately 3,217 square to accommodate the revised driveway location and the Office of the Chancellor mentioned Deed of Trust First American Loa able at the - Saratoga foot residence and construct removal of one Eucalyptus 14000 Fruitvale Avenue- Saratoga, CA 95070 APN# 386.26.040 The street address and other Trustee Services ma acting as a debt col! Community Development Department, Monday a new second floor. The existing second floor is tree for the construction of the cabana. The property is 408- 741.2011 common designation, if any, attempting to collect a through Thursday, 7:30 a.m. approximately 457 square zoned R -1. 40,000. (Chris (Pub SN 1/30, 2/6) - of the real property debt. - 5:00 p.m. If you have ques- feet and the proposed sec -. Riordan) described above is purport- Any information obtained lions, Planners are available at the public counter and floor is approximately 498 square feet. Changes to APPLICATION If MODOS -0001 (510- 03 -012) �,,,_..., /�� Trustee ed to be: 12161 Viewoak Drive, Saratoga, CA 95070 will be used for that purpose. Original document between the hours of 7:30 windows, siding, and a new Labio —15211 Bellecourt The undersigned Trustee signed by Authorized Agent a.m. and 12:00 noon. roof are also proposed. The Drive: The applicant Sales disclaims any liability for Chet Sconyers All interested persons may lot size is approximately requests a Modification to a any incorrectness of the For Trustee's appear and be heard at the 11,270 square feet, and the previously approved Design street address and other Sale Information above time and place. IF you site is located in the R -1- Review application. The TSG NO.: 3478070 common designation, if any, shown herein. Said sale Please Call (714) 573.1965 challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pur- 10,000 zoning district. Design Review approval is modification is for a 110 square foot addition to a TS NO.: 20079070803197 will be made, but without P352979 suant to a public hearing in required pursuant to . 6,008 square foot house FHA /VA /PMI NO.: covenant or warranty, (Pub SN 1/16,1123.1130) Important Information: No refunds after submission. Canceled ads will receive credit for future advertising, not a refund. Ads must be canceled before deadline for that issue. Advertisements are accepted upon the representation that the advertiser and /or its agency have the right to publish the contents thereof. In consid- eration of such publication, advertiser and its agency agree to indemnify and hold the publisher harmless against any expense or loss by reason of any claims arising out of publication. The publisher reserves the right to edit, alter, omit, or refuse any advertising submitted. For policies concerning specific categories, please refer to the paragraph at the beginning of the category or call us at 408.200.1025 or email us at classiftedsCbcommunity- nnvspapers.com. Siticon Valley Community Newspapers accepts no liability for its failure, for any cause, to insert an advertisement. Liability for any error appearing in an adver- tisement is limited to the cost of the space actually occupied. No allowance, how- ever, will be granted for an error that does not materially affect the value of the advertisement. To qualify for an adjustment, any error must be reported within 15 days of publication date. Credit for errors is limited to first insertion. Ad Attachment 5 • Community Development Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, California 95070 15400 Peach Hill Road ARBORIST REPORT APN 517 -22 -072 Owner: Rao and Sita.Arimilli INTRODUCTION Application #: 07 -364 June 18, 2007 Prepared by Kate Bear, City Arborist Phone (408) 868 -1276 The property owner of 15400 Peach Hill Road has submitted a preliminary site plan to the city to construct a new home on a vacant lot. Eighteen trees protected by City Ordinance 15 -050 and potentially impacted by construction were inventoried for this project. Each tree was numbered with an aluminum tag for ease of identification. Data for each tree is included in a Tree Inventory Table at the.end of this report. Tree locations are noted , on the attached copy of the Site Plan. The plans reviewed for this report include a Site Plan, dated April 2007 and prepared by Dunbar and Craig, a Grading and Drainage Plan dated May 21, 2007 by B. A. Zuhdi Consulting Engineers and a Landscape Plan dated May 21, 2007 by Koch & Associates, Inc.. SITE OBSERVATIONS, PLAN REVIEW AND TECHNICAL DISCUSSION Eighteen trees are potentially impacted by construction. They include nine coast live oaks,( #1 — 3, 6 10 and 12 —_ 15), one Arizona cypress ( #4), one Deodar cedar ( #5), three Austrian pines ( #7, 8 and 11), one black oak ( #9), and three eucalyptus (#16— 18). Tree #13 is not shown on the plans and should be surveyed and included on the plans. Trees # 4 - 8 are in conflict with the project and proposed for removal. They include one deodar cedar, one Arizona cypress, two pines and one coast live oak. All but the oak tree are in fair or poor health or have poor structure or both. Pine #7 has cankers in the trunk which indicate decay sites and it could fail at these points. The coast live oak tree has two main trunks and included bark where they meet, and, although it can berelocated, I do notrequire it for this project. The owner may relocate the tree if desired, but I recommend selecting a site other than the area within the turn around for vehicles on the driveway. It is acceptable to remove these five trees,for the project and replace them following construction with new trees. Replacement trees should be valued at $7,960. Replacement values can be found at the bottom of the Tree Inventory Table that is attached to this report. This translates into 16 trees of 24 inch box size or five trees of 36 inch box size and one tree of 24 inch box size. At least four of the trees should be from the City's list of natives. The applicant has requested the ability to remove the trees following Planning Commission approval and prior to issuance of building division permits. This is acceptable. The driveway should be constructed of pervious materials on top of existing grade within the canopies of oak trees #1 — 3. A soil cut exists about two feet from tree #2 and, if a retaining wall is needed at this tree, Page 1 of 4 • • 15400 Peach Hill Road it should be no closer to the trunk than the existing cut. No excavation to construct the driveway should occur within .6 feet from trees #1— 3. Drainage for the driveway involves a drain line about 6 feet from tree #l. This should be bored under roots and no trenching should occur to install it. No roots measuring 2 inches or larger should be cut for any of the drain lines. A second driveway is proposed in the vicinity of trees #10 —15. It will impact trees #10, 11, 14 and 15. It also, should be constructed of pervious materials on top of grade under the canopies of these trees and no excavation should occur to construct it within 10 feet from tree #11 or 8 feet from tree 910. Drainage is proposed under the driveway that will require the removal of trees #10, 13 and 14. Rip rap structures should not be placed under the canopies of the oaks or within 10 feet of pine tree #11. Retaining walls are proposed near trees #9, 16, 17 and 18. They should be constructed with footings rather than continuous trenching under the canopies of these trees. Tree #9 is a black oak in excellent condition and the retaining wall should remain at least seven feet from its trunk..The walls near trees #16 - 18 should be at least 15 feet from the trunks of these trees. The drainage between trees #17 and 18 should remain at least 15 feet from either tree. Roots measuring two inches or larger should be tunneled under rather than cut to install the line. All locations for utilities (including trenching for water, sewer, drainage, gas and electrical) should be shown on the plans so they can be evaluated for impacts to trees. Landscaping plans, including irrigation lines, valves and controller locations should also be shown so they can be evaluated for impacts to trees. Per City Ordinance 15- 50.080, a bond in the amount of $95,560, which is equal to 100% of the total appraised value trees #1 — 3, 9 —11, 14 — 18, is required. This amount may change as the design is, developed. Appraisal values are calculated according to the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9rh Edition, published by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), 2000. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. This entire report, including the Tree Inventory Table and the map showing locations of trees and protective fencing, shall be incorporated into the set of final building plans. 2. Tree protective fencing shall be installed as shown on the attached map and established prior to obtaining building division permits. It shall be comprised of six -foot high chain link fencing mounted on eight -foot tall, two -inch diameter galvanized posts, driven 24 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. 3. Owner shall provide a tree protection bond in the amount of $95,560 prior to obtaining building division permits. The amount of the bond may change if the design of the project changes to impact fewer or more trees. 4. Owner shall replace trees approved for removal with replacement trees equal in value to the total appraised value of the trees. Replacement trees shall total $7,960 in appraised value. Replacement values of trees can be found at the bottom of the Tree Inventory Table following this report. Page 2 of 4 15400 Peach Hill Road 5. Trees approved for removal may be removed following Planning Commission approval and prior to issuance of building division permits. 6. At least four of the replacement trees shall be from the City's list of natives: coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), valley oak (Quercus lobata), blue oak (Quercus douglasiana), black oak (Quercus kelloggii), big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), California buckeye (Aesculus californica), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens). 7. _ Any grading or trenching under a tree's canopy shall be approved by the city arborist prior to performing work'. If approved, it shall be done manually using shovels. Any roots measuring two inches or larger shall be retained and tunneled under; roots measuring less than two inches may be cut with a sharp pruning instrument. This includes installation of drainage to rip rap structures. 8. Plans shall show locations for all utilities including electrical, drainage, water, sewer and gas lines. 9. Trees shall be watered every three weeks during the dry summer months or more often as necessary to ensure their continued good health. Water using a soaker hose or drip line midway' between the trunk and the edge of the canopy. Use enough water so that the soil is moist to a depth of one foot deep. 10. Unless otherwise approved, all construction activities must be conducted outside the designated fenced. area (even after fencing is removed). These activities include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: demolition, grading, trenching, equipment cleaning, stockpiling and dumping materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 11. Any approved grading or trenching beneath the tree's canopy shall be manually performed using shovels. 12. If landscaping will occur, design the plans to show the following: a. Design irrigation so that it does not spray trunks of trees. Locate valve boxes and controllers outside of drip lines of tree canopies. b. Select plants.with similar water requirements to the trees under which they will be placed. c. Design lawns so that there is room between them and the trunk of any tree; confine lawn areas to the outside 20% of the area.under the canopy. d. Plant only drought tolerant plants compatible with oaks under the oak trees. Do riot include lawn within the drip line of any oak tree on the property. . e. Design topdressings so that stones or mulch remain at least one foot from the trunks of retained trees and 6 inches from the trunks of new trees. f. Do not allow tilling or stripping of the topsoil beneath the trees' canopies. g. Establish edging material proposed beneath tree canopies on top of existing soil grade by using stakes: 13. Any pruning of trees on site must be performed under the supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. 14. The disposal of harmful products (such as chemicals, oil, gasoline, herbicides, rinse water from . paint or concrete, or other harmful materials) is prohibited beneath tree canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath tree canopies. Page 3. of 4 15400 Peach Hill Road Attachments: Tree Inventory Table Map Showing Tree Locations and Protective Fencing 7-.� • Page 4 of 4 TREE INVENTORY TABLE 0 Coast live oak Cc o o � 0 b co 1 Quercus agrifolia .2 25 80 80 Good High 3 0 0 $3,930 Coast live oak �¢ o o cn ° a� v a Cd 2 Quercus agrifolia 0 25 o b 3 N o a .�°. w `^ .. 3 °¢ tb ed > Coast live oak -- Cti. o a� u+ O U u Cd ° G 4, ° Fy. Cd 3 Quercus a i olia 12.6 20 o 80 Good High 2 a o b 0 Arizona cypress o 0 Z r. .0 :; Cc TREE NO. TREE NAME F C) w x a -0 O cn x 1 Q Z a a Q 0 Address: 15400 Peach Hill Road June 18, 2007 0 Coast live oak 1 Quercus agrifolia 14.6 25 80 80 Good High 2 $3,930 Coast live oak 8.1, 2 Quercus agrifolia 8.9 25 90 70 Good High 2 $3,080 Coast live oak 3 Quercus a i olia 12.6 20 80 80 Good High 2 $2,950 Arizona cypress 4 Cu ressus arizonica 13.5 12 20 20 Fair Low 1 X $560 Deodar cedar 5 Cedrus deodard 1.9.5 30 30 10 Fair Low 1 X $1,320 Coast live oak 8114, 6 Quercus a ri olia 9.3 20 90 40 Good Moderate 1 X $2,090 Austrian pine 7 Pinus ni a .27.5. 40 10 10 Poor Low 1 X $820' Austrian pine 8 Pinus,nigra 31.1 45 30 20 Poor Low 1 X $3,170 Black oak 9 Quercus kelloggii 9.8 12 90 90 Good High 2 $4,040 Coast live oak 10 Quercus a ri olia 14 15 '60 70 Fair Moderate 2 $2,940 Austrian pine 11 Pinus nigra 32.1 45 60 80 Good High 4 $14,200 Coast live oak 12 Quercus a ri olia 7.9 6 80 80 Good High 4 $1J00 Coast live oak 5.7, 5.9, 13 Quemus'agrifolia 6.4 15 90 60 Good High 4 X $3,010 Coast live oak .6; 4A, 14 Quercus agrifolia 4.7 10 80 10 Good Low 3 $500 Coast live oak . 15 Quercus a i olia 9.7 20 100 90 Good High 2 $2,520 Eucalyptus 16 Eucalyptus leuco lon 28.1 35 90 80 Good High 3 $16,300 Eucalyptus 17 1 Eucalyptus eucoxylon 28.9 35 90 80 Good High 2 $17,200 Address: 15400 Peach Hill Road June 18, 2007 0 4 TREE INVENTORY TABLE 1 Eucalyptus 1 1 1 II 0 o 1 � 0 18 Eucalyptus leucox lon 38 45 C) 80 Good C° 3 0 $27,900 .a a to ° p:� aII tn a U :b 3 3 0 10 a) �, y 3 o d > A c 2 U O N O\ 01 0 h TREE -d o U( 111111 a NO. TREE NAME 3 F,0 w� xp �� > O �x �`. �A o Z c o as d 1 Eucalyptus 1 1 1 1 1 18 Eucalyptus leucox lon 38 45 90 80 Good High 3 $27,900 Total Appraised Value $107,630 Replacement Tree Values 15 gallon = $150 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 48 inch box = $5,000 52 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 Should any tree listed above become damaged owner will be required to repair the damage. Should any tree listed above be removed owner will be required to replace that tree with trees equal in value to its assessed value. Address: June 18, 2007 15400 Peach Hill Road Community Development Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, Califomia 95070 15400 Peach Hill Road ARBORIST REPORT APN 517 -22 -072 Owner: Rao and Sita Arimilli INTRODUCTION Application #: 07 -364 January 23, 2008 Prepared by Kate Bear, City Arborist Phone. (408) 868 -1276 The property owner of 15400 Peach Hill Road has modified their approved plans to include a swimming pool and cabana and relocate, the driveway so that it is centered on the front entrance. Eighteen trees were inventoried for the June 18, 2007 report. The Tree Inventory Table from that report has been revised for this report to reflect the changes in the project. A revised site plan prepared by Koch & Associates and dated December 3, 2007 was reviewed for this report. SITE OBSERVATIONS, PLAN REVIEW AND TECHNICAL DISCUSSION The project has been redesigned, causing the entrance to the house to be relocated, thereby causing the driveway to be relocated to line up properly with the front of the house. This change impacts coast live oak trees #10, 12, 13 and 14. Tree #13 is in the path of the driveway and trees #10, 12 and 14 are close to the driveway and will suffer significant root loss. Tree #10 is in fair health and appears to have been attacked by beetles in the past. The tree cannot repair the damage done by the beetles and will retain the rough appearance of the bark for the remainder of its life. Trees #13 and 14 have three small trunks each that twist around each other to create very poor structure. This poor structure cannot be corrected through pruning. Tree #12 is a nice tree, but extremely close to and crowded by a very large Austrian pine, in addition to being impacted by the driveway construction. The total appraised value of trees #10, 12, 13 and 14 is $7,550. It is acceptable to remove trees #10, 12, 13 and 14 to construct the new driveway and replace them with $7,550 in new trees. Replacement values can be found at the bottom of the Tree Inventory Table that. is attached to this report. This translates into 15 trees of 24 inch box size or five trees of 36 inch box size. At least four of the trees should be from the following list of native species: coast. live oak (Quercus agrifolia), valley oak (Quercus lobata), blue oak (Quercus douglash), black oak (Quercus kelloggii), big leaf maple (Aces macrophyllum), California buckeye (Aesculus californica), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens). Eucalyptus tree #16 is in conflict with a proposed cabana. The tree is a beautiful specimen, although this species is not native to the area and is known for having brittle limbs. It requires frequent pruning to maintain its structure and in hillside locations can be considered a potential fire hazard. The appraised value of tree #16 is $16,300. It is acceptable to remove this tree as proposed and replace it with new trees of equal value to its appraised value following construction of the project. Page 1 of 2 • • 15400 Peach Hill Road 0 RECOMMENDATIONS 1. This entire report, including the Tree Inventory Table, shall be incorporated into the set of final building plans. 2. It is acceptable to remove trees #10, 12, 13, 14, and 16 for construction of the project. Owner shall replace these trees with new trees equal in value to $23,850. Replacement values of trees can be found at the bottom of the Tree Inventory Table following this report. 3. At least four of the replacement trees shall be from the City's list of acceptable natives: coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), valley oak (Quercus lobata), blue oak (Quercus douglasiana), black oak (Quercus kelloggii), big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), California buckeye (Aesculus californica), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens). Attachments: Tree Inventory Table • • Page 2 of 2 TREE INVENTORY TABLE . Coast live oak h d G n 0 •� 1 Quercus a rifolia 14.6 25 0 ,. Good 3 0 a $3,930. Coast live oak 8.1, c, o era } 2 Quercus a ri olia 8.9 °q c a°4i o Good a � �, b^ $3,080 Coast live oak a v 3 3 a ° 3 °¢ � ,o 3 . Quercus a ri olia �1 a° 20 ° � U o ° 3 0 $2,950 TREE Arizona cypress b E o o n r. x 11 o U °, 3 NO. TREE NAME F. � w 'v. x °' O DO x 4 Q 1 Z $560 Deodar cedar .o v� 4 -a a January 23, 2008 15400 Peach Hill Road ,1 0 u Coast live oak 1 Quercus a rifolia 14.6 25 80 80 Good High 2 $3,930. Coast live oak 8.1, 2 Quercus a ri olia 8.9 25 90 70 Good High 2 $3,080 Coast live oak 3 . Quercus a ri olia 12.6 20 80 80 Good High 2 $2,950 Arizona cypress 4 Cu ressus arizonica 13.5 12 20 20 Fair Low 1 X $560 Deodar cedar 5 Cedrus deodara 10.5 30 30 10 Fair Low 1 X $1,320 Coast live oak 8.4, 6 Quercus a ri olia 9.3 20 90 40 Good Moderate 1 X $2,090 Austrian pine 7 Pinus ni ra 27.5 1 40 10 10 Poor Low 1 X $820 Austrian pine 8 Pinus ni ra 31.1 45 30 20 Poor Low 1 X $3,170 Black oak 9 Quercus kelloggii 9.8 12 90 90 Good High 2 $4,040 Coast live oak 10 Quercus a ri olia 14 15 50 70 Fair Moderate 1 X $2,940 Austrian pine 11 Pinus ni ra 32.1 45 60 80 Good High 4 $14,200 Coast live oak 12 Quercus a rifolia 7.9 6 80 80 Good Moderate 1 X $1,100 Coast _live.oak 5.7, 5.9; 13 Quercus agrifolia 6A 15 90 60 Good Low 1 X X $3,010 Coast live oak .6, 4.4, 14 Quercus a ri olia 4.7 10 80 10 Good Low 1 X $500 Coast live oak 15 Quercus a ri olia 9.7 20 100 90 Good High 2 $2,520 Eucalyptus 16 Eucalyptus leucox lon 28.1 35 90 80 Good High 1 X $16,300 Eucalyptus 1 1 17 Eucalyptus leucox lon 28.9 35 90 80 Good High 2 $17,200 January 23, 2008 15400 Peach Hill Road ,1 0 u F- L TREE INVENTORY TABLE 18 Eucalyptus. Eucalyptus leucoxylon � rn 45 1 90 u Good High -� -� $27,900 0 Co M 0 in 4) Ca V a U b 3 3 a �° 4, y 3 0 Q CU C� U �'� ° 3 0 b TREE °' co ° ° ° x NO.. TREE NAME F:• 0 •• w v x .fl W .0 O �° C x Z7 U'� , z o a a Q 18 Eucalyptus. Eucalyptus leucoxylon 1 38 1 45 1 90 1 80 Good High 3 $27,900 Total Appraised Value $107,630 • Replacement Tree Values 15 gallon = $150 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 48 inch box = $5,000 52 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 Should_ any tree listed above become damaged owner will be required to repair the damage. Should any tree listed above be removed owner will be required. to replace that tree with trees equal in value to its assessed value. January 23, 2008 15400 Peach Hill Road Attachment 6 I • L� 0 • 0 j PROJECT DATA Aeeeaore Pareel Number: 517 -22 -072 project A A Jdreea; 15400 Peach Hill Road Saratoga, California, 95070 Property �wner: V. Armilli and Sito Arimilli 13934 Cheater Avenue Saratoga, California, 95070 Project 9 ape of Work; Remove trees ae requested, jopen air cabana, pool and pond Existing Zf oning: R-140 Existing be: Home to be constructed Proposed) Use: New Single Family Residence - Landscape Lot Size: 76,535 sq.ft. gross )1.BAC) 68,650 aq.ft. net 11.6AC) Average ;Site Slope: 18.9% Slope ah'}}}���ew Structure - cabana - pool: 12.BX AllowableFloor Areo: 6,820 eq.ft. Proposed Floor Area; 6,699 acitt. Site Coverage os Follows• Buildingg coverage: 5,692 aq.ft. Porchde: 1,778 aq.ft. patio dnd Walkways: 619 eq.ft. Drivewpye; 3,135 aq.ft. Fire Truck Turn Around: 2648 aq.ft. Pool: ,140 aq.ft. Pond: 216 aq.ft. Pool Dleck: 1,600 aq.ft. Gabon : 759 aq.ft. Total Imppervious Coverage: 17,587 aq.ft. 25% LandecapI and Natural Open Space: 51,063 sq.ft. 75% 68,650 aq.ft. 100X Cabana eight limit: 10' Cabana Setback: Side and Rear 10' Minimum fn w < g U U) o _ 023 = o s &8 U mm �Mi rU U _ a O C01 IU) Q '- N F-' % a war r l .i-_— _:__ I ([f[>i rDGN G —�.z ��t -�L �-�� _ —�" ( / / 0 Col.rr- %� �—!`� ,-- / Tan Color ,_!]_��{��—._. - C-�"C_ / l ysla- J ID — \ I I CITY sheet: �"°De''uD,r .e.) '_ C B ' 0, e of sheets Ez m5D L U A r; :7 • 0 JUTE: 1LL OUTOOOP- IP.00UGE9 AFE 55AIN'-E6S STEEL 1 'sAgir, 5 51=( i�8 "5itcw frn(sl + YP. . �wwre r�r siNl�- m f6' - Sfvinfes5 -5 +ec ( W riy—, s Dbi.. p,�urner, Gas _ o�ooao _ 00 _ y rjos, r,'v — — �— 15- 06.340 Height of buildings. ST�NLESS "T"L- °+?AIMLESS 7EEL� II I II UIXEp-WUQTr P SINLESS =1EEL „`_Gil nl.�n va�a., oaao -s !c ¢o 24•' ,re �EpeP ccca -g Height ofbuilding" means the vertical distance from gll SI.o" the averageofthe highest and low 'estpoint ofthe lot atthe building's edge, measured from natural grade, of that por- tion of the(lot covered by the building to the topmost point of the roof excluding appurtenances, unless otherwise 0 A Vie\ LIFT SIDE - ELEVATION ,._.__EAST -__ NMAXIMVM5TRU[-TURE HEIGHT 514:50' AVEPAGE ELEVATION 50+50, LOWE5T .POINT. -4 15UILDIN6. EME: 501..50' -- '- _ FRO K- r-- ___ELEVATION_._._ - NORTH Q Q specified in this Chapter. The Community Development Director, through the use of the best available information, such as tract grading plans, vegetation, and neighborhood topography or existing grades, shall determine natural F/r ❑wE grade. (;k tended by Ord. 223 § 2 (part), 2003) 4 3 f'�t Fbin +4� Brtit�i�9 E�2 `.�07•`�I AitR►4�2+ �:.IrtY:2 �:.°w<it i6rt SOg.$Or t . SrUCCD 7' 2�' NErAL SrUfY� RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION WEST REAR ELEVATION- a SOOT14 I ul O U � O Z N 0 W rk v J ll) M MI Vu �: A ET. maf afe4ric, 50(ar fbinek on fla+ roof. eUILr. Up rya e, e P EL xa" a -Yvkvo TYR - 4 3 Pointaf -- - W. Tyr. - — - Fx15{in9 grade- line 1 p P,E vaT T fp. cowMN, rfP.. TO mnTCN Hause r � "y( -one +1(e over CONc; 5(a6 floor - REAR ELEVATION- a SOOT14 I ul O U � O Z N 0 W rk v J ll) M MI Vu �: A ET. Item 3 � REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • • Application No. /Location: ADR07 -0022 —13574 Howen Drive Type of Application: Design Review for a second story addition to an existing two story single - family residence Owner: Bijan / Sangam Staff Planner: Shweta Bhatt, Associate Planner Meeting Date: February 13, 2008 APN: 393 -38 -007 Department Head: �2 John Livingstone, AICP y � is t3 „ I 5% S ei I g PG a -�'; L tw i1 i i1^ N L AE NAR a•: e I ; -. .. .._._. eRAEMAR, 8 1 v,_�»•w. s ?3 fs �feitiif� I- N tc-_r Icy � 1a �,,�� •• � �... , •� � ti ° •. -•�1 YI , ..1' ,i�.. :I��IYg I �a,Y � yf " 6 � 9�: •gib'_ IC L+ ¢ .�..� 3 o�d YF i I li � �e�• � «d L - :u.-- .\ • -'��-� :�«� .`L� Yfl :ct<4,__ `'.. ,.• .R .. -F ;Y Paw pl.d Y. •I .!?� • - -nCf if .- ,.+�__. VISTA- �•__CT._.q y�l• M S: _ -t.: - VISTA ' ,1 .u> w.aa fil5 ---err 4.c. w ' � • . s ;'_ir.,� • ^- {-- -- . � - _is° -- -` - •fR '�E �4x as :x; .R ' �. ���s �M _- � ��� '`; :�c_: r - `ile. � " 1 N - -- I - °`"--. L b .h r• �D TREE - ... x w ,\ ~ . I ga 13 � FO � ��10 yy.. Nfa I " ` I. r. .%•�h �' a0 I j111, s Subject: 13574 Howen Drive 500' Radius APN: 393 -38 -007 13574 Howen Drive Application No. ADR07 -0022; 13574 Howen Drive PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Design Review approval to demolish the existing second floor of the approximately 3,217 square foot residence and construct a new second floor. The existing second floor is approximately 457 square feet and the proposed second floor is approximately 498 square feet. Changes to windows, siding, and a new roof are also proposed. The lot size is approximately 11,270 square feet, and the site is located in the R- 1- 10,000 zoning district. PERMANENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Staff is not recommending any permanent conditions of approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the design review application with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. • Page 2 of 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY: Application filed: 11/05/07 Application complete: 01/23/08 Notice published: 01/30/08 Mailing completed: 01/25/08 Posting completed: 02/07/08 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Design Review approval to demolish the existing second floor of the approximately 3,217 square foot residence and construct a new second floor. The existing second floor is approximately 457 square feet and the proposed second floor is approximately 498 square feet. Changes to windows, siding, and a new roof are also proposed. The lot size is approximately 11,270 square feet, and the site is located in the R- 1- 10,000 zoning district. PERMANENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Staff is not recommending any permanent conditions of approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the design review application with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. • Page 2 of 7 • Application No. ADR07- -0022, 13574 Howen Drive STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R- 1- 10,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential (MDR) MEASURE G: Not Applicable PARCEL SIZE: Gross: 11,270 square feet; Net: 11,270square feet SLOPE: The site is relatively flat. GRADING REQUIRED: No grading is required for this project. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed addition is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 of Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 ( "CEQA Guidelines "). This exemption allows for the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures and no exception to that exemption applies. MATERIALS AND COLORS: Materials and colors include beige stucco and siding, dark brown aluminum clad wood windows, and new composition shingle roofing. A colors and materials board is available on file with the Community Development Department and will be presented at the site visits and public hearing. Detail Colors and Material Manufacturer Windows Dark Brown Aluminum Clad Wood Anderson 400 Series Front Door No change No change Garage Door Beige Wood Carriage Style Halcyon Overhead Doors Roof Brown Composition Shingle Elk Building Products Page 3 of 7 Application No. ADR07 -0022; 13574 Howen Drive PROJECT DATA: R- 1-I0,000Zon1ng Proposed Required Net Site Atea:,11,270 s uare,feet Site Coverage Residence: 2,860 SF Driveway: 1,018 SF Maximum Allowable = Walkway(s): 2,096 SF 6,762 SF (60 %) TOTAL Site Coverage 5,974 SF (53.0 %) Floor Area Existing First Floor Area: 2,260 SF Existing Second Floor Area: 457 SF Existing Garage Area: 500 SF Maximum Allowable = TOTAL Existing Floor Area 3,217 SF 3,540 SF Proposed First Floor Area: 2,318 SF Proposed Second Floor Area: 498 SF Proposed Garage Area:. 542 SF TOTAL Proposed Floor Area 3,358 SF Setbacks First Second First Floor Second Floor Floor. Floor Front: 25 Feet 60 Feet 25 Feet 25 Feet 5 Inches Rear: 35 Feet 38 Feet 25 Feet 35 Feet 7Inches 2Inches Left (North) Side: 10 Feet 15 Feet 10 Feet 15 Feet l Inch Right (South) Side: 9 Feet 7 54 Feet 10 Feet 15 Feet Inches* 5Inches Height Lowest Elevation Point: 104.29 Maximum Height = Highest Elevation Point: 105.08 130.69 (26 Feet) Average Elevation Point: 104.69 Proposed Topmost Point: 127.20 (22 Feet 6 Inches) * This setback is existing non - conforming. No changes are proposed to this side of the home. PROJECT DISCUSSION AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS The. existing two -story home is located on a rectangular lot with. direct access from Howen Drive. The site is relatively flat and is surrounded by a two story home to the north and- one story homes on the other three sides. Mature trees exist in both the front and rear yards; no trees are proposed for removal in conjunction with this project. Page 4 of 7 • • a Application No. ADR07 -0022; 13574 Howen Drive The project scope includes demolishing the existing second floor of the home and constructing a new second story. The existing second floor does not meet sideyard setback requirements. The proposed addition will meet the required second floor setback requirement of 15 -feet. Modifications to the first floor include a modest addition to the garage of approximately 42 square feet, as well as a new bay window to the dining area. The existing porch area will be slightly enlarged. Architectural Style The existing second floor has a gabled roof, consistent with that covering the garage. Staff had initial concerns regarding changing the orientation of the roofline so that.it was parallel to the first floor. However, the applicant has provided photographs of other two - story homes in the neighborhood, demonstrating that style of the proposed second floor is consistent with the neighborhood. Additionally, a gable roof on the proposed addition would result in a taller home that has a bulkier appearance. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the proposed design. A new wood carriage style garage door is proposed and will be painted to match the siding on the existing first floor and the proposed second floor. Trees No trees are proposed for removal in conjunction with this project. Many of the mature trees on the parcel are located closer to the front property line, where there is no construction proposed. Other trees on the parcel are either already surrounded by hardscape or are at a distance from the proposed construction. Geotechnical Clearance No geotechnical clearance was required for this project. Energy Efficiency The proposed addition is modest in nature and thus the aggregate square footage of the home will be slightly larger than what currently exists. The site is currently shaded with mature trees and landscaping along property lines. The applicant's proposed energy efficiency techniques are listed in attachment #3. Neighbor Correspondence The applicant has contacted several neighbors. Staff has not received any further comments as of the writing of this staff report. General Plan Findings The proposed project is consistent with all of the following General Plan Policies: Conservation Element Policy 6.0 — Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. The subject property is located in a neighborhood with both one and two -story homes. The addition will be compatible to the existing home and will be consistent with the architectural style of Page 5 of 7 Application No. ADR07 -0022; 13574 Howen Drive several other homes in the vicinity. Also, the proposed materials are earth-tone. in color and will compliment the rural atmosphere of Saratoga. Land Use Element Policy 5.0 — The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the Findings required for Design Approval. Design Review Findings The proposed project is consistent with all of the following Design Review findings stated in City Code Section 15- 45.080: (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The existing home is a two -story home and the proposed addition is in approximately the same location as the existing second floor.. Where the existing second floor does not meet the minimum required second floor setback, the new construction will meet this requirement; providing a greater distance than currently exists between adjacent neighbors. No windows are proposed on the . side, elevations and proposed windows to the front and rear facades are in similar locations to existing windows. Additionally, the proposed second story is well below the maximum permitted height. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. Removal of landscaping is not required for this project. The proposed addition has been situated away from mature trees on the parcel. Also, the majority of the proposed square footage is to the second floor of the home, minimizing impact to landscaping. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. The proposed project will not require removal of native or heritage trees. The majority of proposed square footage is to the second floor of the structure, where minimal impacts will occurr to trees and landscaping on the ground. The addition to the garage and dining room is in an area that is already hardscaped. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. The addition will have horizontal siding similar to the first floor. The second floor of the home substantially exceeds front yard setback requirements and is modest in square footage. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (e) Compatible bulk and height. The subject property is located in a neighborhood that has both one and two -story homes. The addition has been designed to be compatible and consistent with other homes in the vicinity and the proposed height of the home is well below the maximum permitted. This finding may be made in the affirmative. Page 6 of 7 C7 Application No. ADR07 -0022; 13574 Howen Drive (f) Current grading and erosion control methods. Since the building site is relatively flat and the majority of the proposed addition is to the second floor, no grading is proposed. The project is conditioned to conform to the City's current grading and erosion control standards. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook as described in the findings above. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning . Commission find this application exempt from CEQA and approve the application for Design Review with required findings 'and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution of Approval. 2. Neighbor Notification templates. 3. Applicant's Letter Regarding Energy Efficiency 4. Affidavit of Mailing Notices, Public Hearing Notice, Mailing labels for project notification, and Proof of Newspaper Publishing. 5. Photos of Homes in Neighborhood. 6. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A ". Page 7 of 7 m,ent ttach 1 • • • APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. Application No. ADR07 -0022 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Bijan /Sangam; 13574 Howen Drive Demolition of second story and new second story addition WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review to demolish the existing second floor and construct an approximately 457 square -foot second story for the existing home located at 13574 Howen Drive. The lot is situated in the R -1- 10,000 zoning district and is approximately 11,270 net square feet in size; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, the project, which proposes to construct an addition to an existing single family dwelling is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This Class 3 exemption applies to is construction of a single family home in an urbanized area; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for design review approval, and the following findings specified in City Code Section 15- 45.080 and the City's Residential Design Handbook have been determined: Conservation Element Policy 6.0 — Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. The subject property is located in a neighborhood with both one and two -story homes. The addition will be compatible to the existing home and will be consistent with the architectural style of several other homes in the vicinity. Also, the proposed materials are earth -tone in color and will compliment the rural atmosphere of Saratoga. Land Use Element Policy 5.0 — The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the Findings required for Design Approval. Design Review Findings The proposed project is consistent with all of the following Design Review findings stated in City Code Section 15- 45.080: • Application ADR07 -0022 13:174 Howen Drive Bijan/Sangam (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The existing home is a two -story home and the proposed addition is in approximately, the same location as the existing second floor. Where the existing second floor does not meet the minimum required second floor setback, the new construction will meet this requirement, providing a greater distance than currently exists between adjacent neighbors. No windows are proposed on the side elevations and proposed windows to the front and rear facades are in similar locations to existing windows. Additionally, the proposed second story is well below the maximum permitted height. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. Removal of landscaping is not required for this project. The proposed addition has been situated away from mature trees on the parcel. Also, the majority of the proposed square footage is to the second floor of the home, minimizing impact to landscaping. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. The proposed project will not require removal of native or heritage trees. The majority of proposed squarre footage is to the second floor of the structure, where minimal impacts will occurr to trees and landscaping on the ground. The addition to the garage and dining; room is in an area that is already hardscaped. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. The addition will have horizontal siding similar to the first floor. The second floor of the home substantially exceeds front yard setback requirements and is modest in square footage. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (e) Compatible bulk and height. The subject property is located in a. neighborhood that has both one and two -story homes. The addition has been designed to be 'compatible and consistent with other homes in the vicinity and. the proposed height of the home is well below the maximum permitted. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (f) Current grading and erosion control methods. Since the building site is relatively flat and the majority of the proposed addition is to the second floor, no grading is proposed. The project is conditioned to conform to the City's current grading ' and erosion control- standards. This finding may be made in the .affirmative. (g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed . project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook as described in the findings above. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Application ADR07 -0022 13574 Howen Drive Bijan/Sangam Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, application number ADR07 -0022 for Design Review Approval is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. The proposed home shall be constructed as shown on Exhibit "A" incorporated by reference. 2. A maximum of one wood - burning fireplace shall be permitted. 3. Four sets of complete construction plans incorporating this Resolution shall be included on the plans submitted to the Building Division for permit plan check review. 4. Final landscape, irrigation and utility plans shall be incorporated into the construction plan set and shall take into account the following requirements: • Landscape. plan shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff, promote surface infiltration and minimize use of fertilizers and pesticides that can contribute to water pollution. Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. • Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. • Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. • Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. • A note shall be included on the site plan stating that no construction equipment or private vehicles shall park or be stored within the dripline of any ordinance protected trees on the site. 5. Any changes to the approved plans must be submitted in writing with a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. No downgrading in the exterior'appearance of the approved residence will be approved by staff. Downgrades may include but are not limited to garage doors, architectural detailing, stonework, columns, shutters, Application ADR07 -0022 13574 Howen Drive . Bijan/Sangam driveway materials, etc. Proposed changes to the approved plans are subject to the approval of the Community Development Director and may require review by the Planning Commission. 6. The site plan shall contain a note with the following language: "Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the LLS of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per the approved plans." 7. A storm water retention plan indicating how storm water will be retained on -site to the maximum extent feasible, and incorporating the New Development and. Construction — Best Management Practices, shall be submitted along with the complete construction drawings. If all storm water cannot be retained on -site due to topographic, soils or other constraints, an explanatory note shall be provided on the plan. 8. Water and/or runoff from the project site shall not be directed toward the adjacent properties. 9. All processing. fees, in the form of deposit accounts on file with the community development department, shall be reconciled with a minimum $500 surplus balance at all times. In the event that the balance is less than $500, all staff work on the project shall cease until the balance is restored to a minimum of $500. FIRE DEPARTMENT 10. The applicant shall comply with all Fire Department conditions. CITY ATTORNEY 11 Applicant agrees to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. Section 2.. Construction must commence within thirty -six (36) months or approval will expire. _ Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15 -90 of the Saratoga. City Code, this resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. • • • • • • Application ADR07 -0022 13574 Howen Drive Bijan/Sangam PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, on the 13`h day of February 2008 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Joyce Hlava Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: John F. Livingstone, AICP Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant,. and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date /\ 'f-'1- n n ii1 100" �11�1 Ir 1 • • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form �u U D PROJECT ADDRESS: Hc 'e /y' ► V v JAN ® 6 2006 CITY OF SARATOGA Dear Neighbor, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. 1 ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you,may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. ... r v Neighbor Name V Date: 0( pG Signature: % r Neighbor Address: 1 � i1> i Neighbor Phone #: A a6 2 -1 S ~6, If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessar Applicant Name: Date: Application Number: City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 Planning Department City of Saratoga hM r Neighbor Notification Form L JAN 0 8 2ooa PROJECT ADDRESS: �3 `� Ho k/1 ear' ✓�i Vr_ CITY OF SARATOGA Dear Neighbor, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with -the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga.'s Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review. the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408- 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project "planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: 1 i 1 ci j A .1= L -b. PC Date: c- i- Signature:, r Neighbor Address: ;1'i C.. _ C Neighbor Phone #: If.I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Date: Application Number: City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 135 M'Oy-5A% �RIVC- 1; U, Dear Neighbor, �W`W", n"V�k G I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and maybe changed as the project moves forward You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. r <� Neighbor Name: Date: Signature: Neighbor dress: r/p / _ Neighbor Phone #: ����� C� If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Application Number: City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 Date: Planning Department City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form jj'' `i / jj PROJECT ADDRESS: 3 5 7 `t t7G 1cICIV �R) V t Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact.the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: 'PA T Q, 1 CSC �' s4�tS % Date: — l 'La (C7 Signature: ' Neighbor Address: i3�bc s�ti �2rvC 1 Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Application Number:_ City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 Date: Planning Department • • • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form - PROJECT ADDRESS: 3, f (Oi�,i /�.j l% !�� fE ' Dear Neighbor, TY 1117 I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans ate preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. , Neighbor Name: 0 k I i,� 1 ✓--u n Date: AlOyIIemb, , °Z)-o0 Signature: Neighbor Address: ,5 iC{ *,Za, CfF -Neighbor Phone #:O -Ore6 � If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: 0 Application Number: City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 Date: Planning Department City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS:. 1357 uOirfm Aft V 'r Dear Neighbor, I I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and maybe changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. q Neighbor Name " �_` Date: Signature Neighbor Address: 14 V Neighbor Phone #: — .5� 7 3 If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name:_ Application Number: City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 Date: Planning Department • • • Attachment. .3 • Leila Bijan 855 Folsom Street, Suite 320 San Francisco, CA 94107 (510) 206 -8719 in (415) 986 -8024 f leilabijan gm. ail-corn February 6, 2008 Shweta Bhatt City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 . Re: 13574 Howen Drive — Application No. ADR07 -0022 — Policy 5 - Residential Design Handbook - Energy Efficiency Technique #1: Ground Floor - The new work on the ground floor is the extension of the Dining Room. Although the window wall in this room is oriented towards the West, we increased the opening by adding a large bay window to provide more natural light as well as ventilation to the Dining and Kitchen spaces. Second Story — We have provided windows for the two new bedrooms, one facing East and the other West. This maintains the window locations of the existing second. story. Because of the ground floor roof below, we are limited by the space available to fit windows on the south walls. However, these are bedrooms and not main living areas, so the East and West facing windows should be sufficient. To provide more natural light, we have provided skylights in the hall and bathroom, where the position of windows was also not feasible because of the roof below. Technique #2: Not Applicable (no new landscaping) Technique #3: The Second story is offset to meet the 15' required setback to the property line. This offset provides ample light and ventilation to the neighboring building, which is also further offset from the property line. Also, by following the.. direction of the ground floor, roof with the new second story roof, we are able to lower the overall height of the second story significantly and allowing more light and air to the adjacent building and property. Technique #4� Energy- saving roof and wall insulation will be incorporated into all of the areas of new work. Thank you, Leila Bijan • A ttachment 4 C7 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, Denise Kaspar , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the 25`h day of January, 2008, that I deposited 90 notices in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to -wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15- 45.060(b).of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property described as: Address: 13574 Howen Drive APN: 393 -38 -007 that on said day there v,,as regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. p 5 Denise Kaspar Advanced Listing Services • U] • City of Saratoga Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 408- 868 -1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Saratoga's Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Wednesday, the 13th day of February 2008, at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Theater located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. The public hearing agenda item is stated below. Details of this item are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. Please consult the City website at www.saratoga.ca.us regarding Friday office closures. APPLICATION /ADDRESS: #ADR07 -0022 —13574 Howen Drive APPLICANT /OWNER: Bijan / Sangam APN: 393 -38 -007 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Design Review approval to demolish the existing second floor of the approximately 3,217 square foot residence and construct a new second floor. The existing second floor is approximately 457 square feet and the proposed second floor is approximately 498 square feet. Changes to windows, siding, and a new roof are also proposed. The lot size is approximately 11,270 square feet, and the site is located in the R -1- 10,000 zoning district. Design Review approval is required pursuant to Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.060. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the Planning Commission's information packets, written c February 05, 2008. above time and place. In order to be included in the )mmunications should be filed no later than Tuesday A site visit will be held on the day preceding the hearing date listed above as part of the standard Site Visit Committee agenda. Site visits occur between 3:30 and 5:00 p.m. The site visit is open to the public. The Site Visit Committee will convene at the City Hall parking lot at 3:30 p.m. on the day preceding the hearing and visit the site listed above and may visit other sites as well. For more information please contact the Community Development Department at 408 868 -1222 or review the Site Visit Agenda on the City Website at www.sarato ag ca.us. This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor's office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. .In some cases, out -of —date information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all residents potentially affected by a project. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Shweta Bhatt Associate Planner sbllatt( i %saratoga.ca.us (408) 868 -1266 General Notices NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF ROBERT L. CHAMBERS aka ROBERT LEROY CHAMBERS CASE NO. 1-08-PR-162592 To all heirs, beneficiaries . creditors, contingent credi- tors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of ROBERT L. CHAMBERS aka ROBERT LEROY CHAMBERS A PETITION has been filed by JAMES H. CHAMBERS in the Superior Courtof California, County of Santa Clara. THE PETITION requests that JAMES H. CHAMBERS be appointed as personal repre- sentative to administer the estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests the decedent's WILL and codi- cils, if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court. THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This author- ity will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before tak- ing certain very important actions, however, the per- sonal representative will be required to give notice to . interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless uninter- ested person files an objec- tion to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority. . A HEARING on the petition will be held on FEBRUARY 14, 2008, 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 15 located at 191 North First St., San lose, CA 95113. IF YOU OBJECT to the granti- ng of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the deceased, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal repre- sentative appointed by the court within four months from the date of first issuance of letters as provid- ed in section 9100 of the California Probate Code. The lime for riling claims will not axpire before four months from the hearing date noticed above. r'OU MAY EXAMINE the file cept by the court. If you are 3 person interested in the estate, you may file with the :ourt a formal Request for Special Notice of the filing of 3n inventory and appraisal of state assets or of any peti. tion or account as provided in section 1250 of the California Probate Code: A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for petitioner: CHARLES G. STEPHEN50N (BAR NO. 035516) 235 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 1035 SAN. FRANCISCO, CA 94104 415. 705.5300 (Pub SN 1/23, 1/30, 2/6) 3RD AMENDED NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF ALFRED JOSEPH MERNONE aka ALFRED J. MERNONE. CASE NO. 1-08-PR-161970 To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent credi- tors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of ALFRED JOSEPH MERNONE aka ALFRED). MERNONE A PETITION has been filed by KEVIN MERNONE AND GLENN MERNONE in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. THE PETITION requests that KEVIN MERNONE AND GLENN MERNONE be appointed as personal repre- sentative to administer the estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests the decedent's WILL and codi- cils, if any, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils are available for examination in the rile kept by the court. THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This author- ity will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before tak- ing certain very important actions, however, the per- sonal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed .action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an inter- ested person files an objec- tion to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant. the authority. A HEARING on the petition will be heldon FEBRUARY 11, 2008, 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 15 located at 191 North First St., San)ose, CA 95113. IF YOU OBJECT to the granti- ng of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the deceased, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal repre- sentative appointed by the court within four months from the date of first issuance of letters as provid- ed in section 9100 of the California Probate Code. The time for filing claims will not expire before four months from the hearing date noticed above. YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a formal Request for Special Notice of the filing of an inventory and appraisal of estate assets or of any peti- tion or account as provided in section 1250 of the California Probate Code. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk: Attorney for petitioner: MATTHEW A. CROSBY, CSB #070524 2785 PARKAVENUE SANTA CLARA,CA 95050 408. 370.7500 (Pub SN 1123, 1/30, 2/6) �l City Legals NOTICE OF HEARING BEFORE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF SARATOGA S PLANNING COMMISSION announces the following public hearings on Wednesday, the 13th day of February 2008 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers located at, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Details and plans are avail- able at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Thursday, 7:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. If you have ques- tions, Planners are available at the public counter between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 12:00 noon. All interested persons may appear and, be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pur- suant.to a public hearing in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public. hearing(s) described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Saratoga Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. In order to be included in the Planning Commission's infor- mation packets, written communications should be filed on or before the Tuesday, a week before the meeting. A site visit will be held on the day preceding the hearing date listed above as part of the standard Site Visit Committee agenda. Site vis- its occur between 3:30 and 5:00 p.m. The site visit is open to the public. The Site Visit Committee will convene at the City Hall parking lot at 3:30 p.m. on the day preced- ing the hearing and visit the site listed above and may visit other sites as well. For more information please contact the Community Development Department at 408 868.1222 or review the Site Visit Agenda on the City Website at www.sarato- ga.ca:us. APPLICATION # ADR07 -0022 (393.38.007) Bijan /Sangam, 13574 Howen Drive - The applicant requests Design Review approval to demolish the existing second floor of the approximately 3,217 square foot residence and construct a new second floor. The existing second floor is approximately 457 square feet and the proposed sec- ond floor is approximately 498 square feet. Changes to windows, siding, and a new roof are also proposed. The lot size is approximately 11,270 square feet, and the site is located in the R -1- 10,000 zoning district. Design Review approval is required pursuant to Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.060. APPLICATION # CUP07.0001 (386.14.016) Metro PCS, 12768 Saratoga Avenue - The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to locate a wireless facility at the Presbyterian Church near the intersection of Cox Avenue and Saratoga Avenue. The project consists of a new cross structure with con- cealed antennas and a new equipment cabinet enclosed in a shed. The lot size is .approximately ,3.74 acres and the site is zoned R -1- 10,000. APPLICATION # MOD07 -0003, CUPUB -0001 (517.22 -072) Arimitti, 15400 Peach Hill Road: - The appli- cant requests a Conditional Use Permit for the construc- tion of an eight fool tall, 97 square feet Cabana within the rear yard setback and modifications to an approved Design Review application. Modifications includes 1) altering the lay- out of the driveway near the front entrance to avoid con- flict with existing water meters, 2) proposed rear yard landscaping to include concrete patios, swimming pool, and pond, 3) construc- tion of the cabana, and 4) the removal of five trees (including three Oak trees) to accommodate the revised driveway location and the removal of one Eucalyptus tree for the construction of the cabana. The property is zoned R -1. 40,000. (Chris Riordan) APPLICATION # MOD08.0001 (510 - 03.012) Labio —15211 Bellecourt Drive: The applicant requests a. Modification to a previously approved Design Review application. The modification is for a 110 square Foot addition to a 6,008 square foot house But is it e a Legal advertising in Saratoga News is so cost effective, you'll feel like you're getting away with something! Call 408.2oO.1024 to find out how to place fictitious business name statements and other legal ads at one of two convenient Silicon Valley Community Newspapers offices. approved by the Planning Commission on July 11, 2007. The proposal includes demolition of the existing 2,364 sq. ft. residence. The maximum proposed impervi- ous coverage is 35% of the site. The maximum height of the proposed buildings is 26 feet. The lot size is 45,784 square feet, and the site is zoned RS- 40,000. (Pub SN 1/30) WEST VALLEY- MISSION COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT NOTICE At the Special Board Meeting held on Wednesday, January . 23, 2008, the West Valley. Mission Community College District Board of Trustees provisionally appointed Mr. Wade Ellis to fill the vacancy left by the passing of Trustee Don Cordero on December 9, 2007. The seat will be filled permanently in the next gen- eral election in November 2008. Unless a petition calling for a special election, containing a sufficient number of signa- tures, is filed with the coun- ty superintendent of schools within 30 days of the provi- sional appointment, it shall become an effective appoint- ment. (Pursuant - to Education Codes 5091 and 5092) For further information, contact West Valley - Mission Community College District Office of the Chancellor 14000 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 408 - 741.2011 (Pub SN 1/30, 2/6) ✓ Trustee Sales TSG NO.: 3478070 TS NO.: 20079070803197 FHA /VA /PMI NO.: NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE YOU ARE IN DEFAULT UNDER A DEED OF TRUST, DATED 10/25/2005 UNLESS YOU .TAKE ACTION TO PROTECTYOUR PROPER- TY, IT MAY BE SOLD AT A PUBLIC SALE. IF YOU NEED AN EXPLANATION OF THE NATURE OF THE PROCEED- ING AGAINST YOU, YOU SHOULD CONTACT A LAWYER. On 2/5/2008 at 10:00 AM First American Loanstar Trustee Services, as duly appointed Trustee under and pursuant to Deed of Trust recorded 11/0212005, as Instrument No. 18654600, in book , page , of Official Records in the office of the County Recorder of Santa Clara County, State of California. Executed by: Mary L. Girardot, will sell at public auction to highest bidder for cash, cashier's check /cash equivalent or other form of payment authorized by 2924h(b), (payable at time of sale in lawful money of the United States) At the entrance to the Superior Courthouse, 190 N. Market St., San lose, CA All right, title and interest conveyed to and now held by it under said Deed of Trust in the property situated in said County and State described as: As more fully described in the above mentioned Deed of Trust APN# 386 - 26.040 The street address and other common designation, if any, of the real property described above is purport- ed to be: 12161 Viewoak Drive, Saratoga, CA 95070 The undersigned Trustee disclaims any liability for any incorrectness of the street address. and other common designation, if any, shown herein. Said sale will be made, but without covenant or warranty, • expressed or implied, regarding title, possession, or encumbrances, to pay the remaining principal sum of the note s) secured by said Deed of Trust, with interest thereon, as, provided in said note(s), advances, under the terms of said Deed of Trust, fees, charges and. expenses of the Trustee and of the trusts created by said Deed of Trust. The total amount of the unpaid balance of the obligation secured by the property to be sold and reasonable estimated costs, expenses and advances at the time of the initial publication of the Notice of Sale is $1,040,607.91 The beneficiary under said Deed of Trust heretofore executed and delivered to the undersigned a written Declaration of Default and Demand for Sale, and a written Notice of Default and Election to Sell. The undersigned caused ' said Notice of Default and Election to sell to be recorded in the County where the real property is located. Date: 1 /16/2008 First American Title Insurance Company First American LoanStar Trustee Services 3 First American Way Santa Ana, CA 927Q7 First American Loa Trustee Services ma actin g as a debt colle attempting to collect a debt. Any information obtained will be used for that purpose. Original document signed by Authorized Agent. Chet Sconyers For Trustee's Sale Information Please Call (714) 573.1965 P352979 (Pub SN 1/16, 1123, 1130) Important Information: No refunds after submission. Canceled ads will receive credit for future advertising, not a refuncl. Ads must be canceled before deadline for that issue. Advertisements are accepted upon the representation that the advertiser and /or its agency have the right to publish the contents thereof. In consid- eration of such publication, advertiser and its agency agree to indemnify and hold the publisher (harmless against any expense or loss by reason of any claims arising out of publication. The publisher reserves the right to edit, alter, omit, or refuse any advertising submitted. For policies concerning specific categories, please refer to the paragraph at the beginning of the category or call us at 408.200.1025 or email us at classifieds (Pcommunity- newspapers.com. Stticon Valley Community Newspapers accepts no liability for its failure, for any cause, to insert an advertisement. Liability for any error appearing in an adver- tisement is limited to the cost of the space actually occupied. No allowance, how- ever, will be granted for an error that does not materially affect the value of the advertisement. To qualify for an adjustment, any error must be reported within 15 days of publication date. Credit for errors is limited to first insertion. • • • Attachment 5 ..„, -. Other homes in vicinity 13574 Howen Drive; ADR07 -0022 Bijan / Sangam w" Y i' aF+F February 13, 2008 Planning Commission Hearing Photographs provided'by applicant �y Ci !"�h., R M t kai✓ (�?"d..9 Wyk" > N .y�y���� d -. . .� 2� yy. ..� � \ \� � � � \/ . y: . � � ;/� » »» � � \� \� � � � � y. - g.�« m�;�� ?«� . \; <c! \ «� 3yy ?2 \. : /�� ��t� � � �� � / � � � \ D/: \. < �� \� t RLA I. • Attachment 6 • 0 • • TREE fENCJNG NOTE PRIOR TO FOUNW 1 1-11 BY TREE � TWO MAY BE REQUIRED AS A THE CITY, THE LIS OF RECORD SHALL CONDITION TO ENSURE PROTECTION OF PROVIDE A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION THAT TREES. ALL BUILDING SETBACKS ARE PER THE APPROVED PLANS. . 1 (E) 38'-00 HIGH WOOD FENCE, TYP. REQUIRED SETBACK CONTINUE (E) PITCHED ROOF AS AT FIRST FLOOR - REQUIRED - SEE ELEVATIONS BUILDING FOOTPRINT.. (E) 8. ORANGE ! TREE TOR N 85.00' -- TREE TO REMAI . x f - , , {�.;, _ — - -- _;': ._ (E) 6.;� MAIN TO REM I, L.. ,.. l,. ` I I } iDRAWING LIST anONOE�VRAL ' 1 ARA TmESNEETrsrtE RAxaooFwa. t �NrroARYSURVEr Azi MDLRION RODR PUNS ASD IXSTA'aT EIEVAl10N9 AS.1 EJOEWOR FIEVATgH4 A32 E%1ERIOR ELF:VA /d (��{ i1 tp'1 JAN L 4I L�VV CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPM P BELOYI' - FIRST FLOO 'BUILDING FOOTPRINT ..- 8• ICANADNNI. '..' VICINITY ITE BELOW - 2ND FLOOR REQUIRED SETBACK REQUIRED AT SECOND FLOOR -' 'fAC REMAIN I, t POUT (N) SKYLIGHT DOWNSPOUT - (E) FLUE Ire.: JI" , IIC- I l : (1! I I I {I� I II IIII III ( IIII III (E) 8• TREE TO II I 0 �' REMAIN ;, i /- <mAOmIJa I' II II II I 11 III I! j { I I I EXISTING— SECOND I I {II STORY I to C +mr6 r II IT jl jl C SETBACK I I II I Hill EXISTING 11 I I � III IIIII' III II Il I I !l !I 'I r � I I II!illl, FINISH FLOORI FINISH FLOOR f xc 1 I li y q Iy 1,5 } II ! III! II IIIII III II I III 1. I (IIII , II I IIII I n IIII III IIIII- AVERAGE GRADE I t c,, � � _ I I II 11 ,:IIII {II Il I_ I�.I!III li "IIIII il'i.I+Ii) � PROPOS III .__ '•:. II III II li III �I 11 II IIIII{ Ih I!.� 'IIII li, I {III!111!II _ __ II I!I! I..! 1t1 SECOND ( I Ili II,' I I II II STORY 1U•� -1 'a ! III II IIIII !I I I { 1{ I I (IIIII {Ti�ll {I +illj li•IIII IIIII IIII IIII!, ��I� (E)_SETBAEK'. 11 FIRST:. FLOOR I e I DATA DIRECTORY I IIII I I) I I I I I' I I II = II I {IIII IIIII IIIII I!IIIiII!I {III ' SPOUT ENVY n PROJECT ,I I I all, I III Ia I I I�I IIII I I I 1 ! - III .,1,1111 III LII =_ • ..... - - _ P �ADDmGN���}._ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1 OWNS: {il V I. pI gOOOOM�OPAA3EEMENSgNATOR R00R 136 aHV,�en DM I I II Ill I I 'II .:— : .-. .. ..�._._.— .. SECOND STORY RWOOFJ. AM ADWM TK) EEDRDOIAS AND ONE 1 600621 &'fa REPLACE IXSOrJCa ROOFlNO OE MRIPROJECTMAWOER: -3. 13' -8- 14• -7' I .. 0 -r . (E) SETBACK eae B vn DeM� s Pte, m sPOUT _ - _ --- _ c .. - I _ I ral ♦�: ss0.vm> 'Qkw mlblaj 21&8718 NEW ROOF AS REOUI NEW caMF'OSmo i µ15y+ 'fOR FIRST FLOOR EXTENSION - ROOF RIDGE TO MATCH ASPHALT SHINGLE _ _ ROOFING, TYR AT ALL — ' -.- ry .,ice �- ! (E) 14' pAXR Se�tlap0. GAaD'la s 0fi' EXISTING RIDGE - SEE ROOFS -_ _ _- I -'�j o N fiDS AlWrvs OR+e ELEVATIONS _ — = l .gdps'^pRP MYgMa GBSIXI6 _ fl I EOMW USE: Stab Fa^31' RoalOenoe t (sOS1262 -18BD GUTTER, TYP. = N L —" !. 15' cANADN N r�� I IAAILE TREE TO IDT. 1 mooa:v2TO a.r. „ rmc sTUat _ REMAN I :. AOE OF STRUCRIRE: &ALT IN i�8 - __ EEM - =— —'--� I I EBOOR ARFA: 32WaiNbresa,,OepaL Mnat gasp... vsriSA00A1.�3,]W+ -_ — I. — Sao l +,zm lavr 10,0001R00a 1.T1 (,dA- bR) - Yx1i0- 3Wj -YNO S.I. M (IM ROOFING NOTE ANEW WOOD SHINGLE ROOFING WTT1H NEW COMPOSmON ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING, TYP. AT ALL ROOFS DOWNSPOUT - - __ SPOUT -- --- -- — — — — — __ —_ - (E) 2 -8• - OAK TREE REMAIN FLOOR AREA OF SmIJCnmE:l IFI (t �C 0-06 PacN) -zses aa. II :. ram Edpbp- 2ziraJ. .. t./ i1• oli Y PROPOSED: I{ ., TREE TO I REMAIN ''[, ..:,OI ala,A -Roar fRax;ercq pwapasP�n -seas at semdgoor -Aa2 at. PROPERTY —� .... .. LINE ..... -. ... I.. .... ,. -I .. .. .rN .._ Taw - iuesJ. p P,awr a0aseaebwnma rawl+a ss.o d. . - .. .. -. :.., '... .. .. .: fv '. :. .... .. IAPERJIOUS SRE COhA4L,E:' I DnaR.Y -,meat . _ Rntraroeaa. swee.I. sauqua n- LmaPp�1 -meo at. . Tow tnaemwre sea Om s,AtA cI. fssTp � � 31TESLAPE:SW bb.M I .. MGIR MwRMATION: (E) 10,... : MAPLE TREE Laaa16aepp Ebwlbn Pdrcl',azv wpnea Faaay Babm F=! 105M :TO.'REMAIN' awaoa oa.awa: 1NM ... ... . .: . :.. ... .' ".' .. .. .:. .; . - ... Tap Mast a— S..'airA: -.m' LJNEAPFEETOFQnERIORWALLS: E.ft G—Rb FITS ed.ft Seep -Fbor 1P1.7 - TM Effih,p-Sp/' -T { ',Poe HOWEN DRIVE :32-V o m;.a50,aa . Taw P-pmsa DRro[Yhetl - Tar Pmpoeea op, -u,nen �L.ea u� sou aTar r�mu u,e.� Fa.I ROOF PLAN PROPOSED SETRAC% ICI �° tt sloe RSOam -venau g -rl Avuao w.l sea 9B'Y EXHISM - R"r Wenr) w.T, lEdWq a4U U U m '0 I I g I S JP OH OH TBM EL- 4 I' o x ml z w W I OH OH _ I O 3 o �{ o I N I SARATOGA VISTA COURT BRAEMAR DRIVE 5ARA1 UGA VILLAGE 1 BK 85 PG.I ME z w0U"D Hn l a -N 00 _ p v KY U N0. C25801 ? uy} DATE: 11/1/07 = Q V 0 W C� y0 0 ti U) M r V a zz°F- :) uj m y DATE: JUN E 17, 2007 SCALE: AS SHOWN DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: RW SHEET 1 REMOVE STRUCTU REMODEL REMOVE TYP. REMOVE (E) WINDOW EXISTING /DEMOLITION PLAN - SECOND FLOOR (E) 1 M 2 ) EXISTING /DEMOLITION PLAN - FIRST FLOOR LIN "LIqgpmrjApk REVISIONS Q1/ 08/ 08 PLANNING SUBMITTAL LE6A Bl1NI DMON �uewN u oc�msmm�r, svrtam 6W po 5) f,O,GWIm mn (41M FNt9 � co U) G7 0 Z Z a> Z 0 g w U Z Qw o > o LU Q 0) LU !r w C) O C7 =OO Q m< 0 z Q U) z 0 U J z 0� W C 0 Im 0 0 Z 0 U X W Date 01.08.08 Scale As Noted Drawn LB Job Sheet A2.0 • Pl • ft6' —T SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1�a• -1 -o• 1 1 1 2 FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I m 1� 41 1* i _J 6� z A3.1 REVISIONS Q1/08108 PLANNING SUBMITTAL s: LEIIA BLIANoESIGN aw+oo,aw +m p (415) F H16I mldml rv��tgn, Xai.3gF' 4 cQ 6 Co Z) rn V Z Z ch W U W w o � > o r� rr rn W wV CL o� o =o Lo Q M z Q U z L.L.. rr O O H Date 01.08.08 Scale As Noted Drawn LB Job Sheet A2.1 C7 • • On I V O Z � N JC � 0 .. 0 r u 4 REVISIONS LF1LA BIJ4 1 DESrN I..— Ww �.�wcv..o.as• +m v'inam�aa w .,s;cvn x J CO U) Z Z (D Z y . m a W U Z W wo 0 ?o Ln W 0 M Imo. W U d w J O C7 =O �F- a C (rt v T (� Z Q 9 . U) Z Z4 U) \ L W Date 01.08.08 Scale As doted Drawn LB Job Sheet A3.0 l riCDl CLCV/iI IVIV I -0' I ' o ms PAINT [DING AD STUCCO _ 104.69' AVERAGE SITE ELEVATION POINT a BUILDING EDGE. SIDING Q4 . .... .. .... _ .. .. .. __ -__ _ NEW Coll —O 21. --W I 7 r � i i - . ( vlNri WINDOW TYR . .. (E) GRADE -- SOUTH ELEVATION I ' o ms PAINT [DING AD STUCCO _ 104.69' AVERAGE SITE ELEVATION POINT a BUILDING EDGE. ME---- !■■ �i ■■ini�■a■ �s■■i■ � in ■ a' �_ ■ ■ ■■■ ■ ■■■ n■ ■■ ■■■■ ■ n ■ —ELI► ■nn■ ■� ■ ■u�os rniri snnri ■■■ ®� ®�nir■"in �i i r�u ■i�i■i ■ ■' �iisiii��■i■nii"'i ■n�ii MEMO ME ME ■ N ■i■■■ if■■p■ i i LINK II■ ■��■ ■II � � � inu ■o■ ■ei ■■n W�- ■a:i ■m ... iii ■■�■■■ un�__■!��■o�■ii�7i °ii ■ ■■,� ■_■� n■r■�,�■�■s■� iinu 4■ ■■i■■■nnn■nnn,!�� ■��■ ■ ■iin Nin■°%mrwiiiair■ � ■■ _ __ w■ -iiva _� ■■■i ■iifrriiia��iie�■�■ - - ■n■�iiNeu�■�ri�■ii��iii�i�� 1x11 u - - -- Y .: — � 1--'— L�C _il „ifJ 1 . t.. J l` ' l r'r:, i..+.��L !J 1 L1lr i1_1i11_r.l . - - - -- - --- -- - - - -- -- -- -- - - -- - -- - --- - --- --- -- - -- - - — - .. Fm- .. y.� � ❑j EiNMcI. WINDOW "i1nNDOWs.. m. .�Wpp �— ❑ �� — . - - - -- - - -- - - - - -- -- -- - — — T� AUT4PH NEW SIDING I' . 6.4+ HEAD L _.I J L 1 ,1� _ „I .. CLEARANCE r "I �(� i' '� 1 r I I -� i`j.i I i•T I ( i..T�T� 7-I r. II rT. 17. i �, it i1I i'i �.I u ��11��� I I i — 1 LlL Lt - � -�7`_` —i IXISiING GRADE i REVISIONS sw:w�.wax» �v�+ae P A',Icesax'6 f 4 GlavSnm+ J Q I m t/9 0 Z Z a) Z g CL W U Z Li �o LLJ p wU Q 06 0 2O v LO Q r� 0 Q co Z 0 U w U) 0 Z_ 0 m Date 01.08.08 Scale A5 Noted Drawn LB Job Sheet A4.0 • • • Item 4 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No. & Location: CUP07 -0001; 12768 Saratoga Avenue Type of Application: Conditional Use Permit Applicant /Owner: MetroPCS (Applicant) Presbyterian Church of San Jose (owner) Staff Planner: Shweta Bhatt, Associate Planner Meeting Date: February 13, 2008 APN: 386 -14 -016 Department Head: John F. Livingston ' ___..�� • N • .T Fc, T, r' ., I� ` I. .. k45'CV •. - 07.. • is , I8 m '.�.. • , y: v, .... � —mom � ,_ � � .a WA �\ `P' 5516�� fto O! "�- •8:01• • I.. A• A Subject: 12768 Saratoga Avenue 500' Radius APN: 386-14 -016 3. �• I. _... I SAR41 C4S r.r i L• 17 } ^. to � .I. ?P AC NET v ? \ .> 12768 Saratoga Avenue CP r 3. >384C Wyw 07.. , `'\ �\ `P' 5516�� fto O! "�- •8:01• • .,. ASEO .,.,.._c:.; Subject: 12768 Saratoga Avenue 500' Radius APN: 386-14 -016 12768 Saratoga Avenue CP Application No. CUP07 -0001; 12768 Saratoga Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY Application filed: 07/30/07 Application complete: 01/23/08 Notice published: 01/30/08 Mailing completed: 01/25/08 Posting completed: 02/07/08 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to locate a wireless facility at the Presbyterian Church near the intersection of Cox Avenue and Saratoga Avenue. The project consists of a new cross structure with concealed antennas and a new equipment cabinet enclosed in a shed. The lot size is approximately 3.74 acres and the site is zoned R -1- 10,000. PERMANENT CONDITIONS No permanent conditions of approval are required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Conditional Use Permit application by adopting the attached Resolution. 0 Application No. CUP07 -0001; 12768 Saratoga Avenue PROJECT DATA ZONING: R -1- 10,000. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential (MDR). MEASURE G: Not applicable. PARCEL SIZE: Approximately 3.74 acres. AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: Not applicable. GRADING REQUIRED: None. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed project, which includes installation of an equipment cabinet and concealed antennas, is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 of the Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA. This Class 3 exemption applies to new construction of limited small new facilities; installation of small, new equipment and facilities in small structures. PROPOSED EXTERIOR MATERIALS AND COLORS The proposed antenna cables will be concealed within cable tray painted to match the church building wall. The antennas will be concealed within a new cross that will replace the existing cross in the same location on the roof. The church has requested that the cross be painted white. An existing shed will house the equipment for the facility. A condition has been added to require the shed be painted to match the church building. PROJECT DISCUSSION Site Characteristics MetroPCS requests Conditional Use Permit approval to locate a wireless, facility at the Presbyterian Church near the intersection of Saratoga Avenue and Cox Avenue. The site is accessed via a driveway from Saratoga Avenue, which leads to a parking lot at the rear of the parcel. A church building is located near the center and a storage shed is currently located along the driveway. Other MetroPCS Sites in Saratoga MetroPCS currently has six "on -air" sites within the City. The Planning Commission has approved an additional two: one at 14407 Big Basin Way at the June 27, 2007 hearing, and one at 20455 Herrman Avenue at the December 12, 2007 hearing. The subject proposal if approved would be the ninth MetroPCS site in the City. Location and Alternative Sites As indicated by the existing and proposed coverage maps (attachment 5), the location for the antenna facility will improve the wireless coverage MetroPCS provides within Saratoga. The applicant has looked into several options and has concluded that this location best fits the needs of MetroPCS. Staff finds this location to be appropriate, given that the facility will be concealed. Application No. CUP07 -0001; 12768 Saratoga Avenue Antennas The proposed cross will replace the existing cross and will be situated in the same location on the roof. The existing cross is approximately 16 -feet 8.5- inches above the ridgeline of the church building. The proposed cross will be about 1 -foot 3.5- inches taller, thus at a height of 18 feet above the ridgeline. _Equipment Cabinet The equipment cabinet will be enclosed within an existing storage shed on the site, which will moved from its current location to the rear of the church building. The structure currently-has a gable roof, which. will be replaced with a shed roof so that water is directed away from the church building. The applicant proposed three pipe bollards to be placed in front of the shed to distinguish the enclosure from the parking lot. However, to mitigate for the visual impact of the pipe bollards, a condition has been added to require curb stops to be used instead of pipe bollards. An additional condition has been added to ensure the placement of the curb stops will not impair the ability for visitors of the church to park in the spaces adjacent to the shed. The applicant proposes. landscaping in the area where the shed will be located. Neighbor Review The applicant mailed out letters and reduced -size plans to 97 neighbors in close vicinity of the project. � Of those contacted, the applicant has received 19 neighbor templates back. Most neighbors have not listed concerns. One neighbor listed concerns regarding noise. The applicant has contacted this neighbor and has explained that the equipment will be enclosed in a shed. The applicant has indicated that this response has been satisfactory to the neighbor. Another neighbor was concerned regarding the potential impact the landscaping could have on his property. Given that- the scope of work is confined to the center of the lot, the impact to neighboring properties' landscaping will be minimal to none. The applicant has indicated that this response has been satisfactory to the neighbor. Arborist Review No trees. are proposed for removal in .conjunction with this .project. The City Arborist has identified six trees on the ,propert y that could potentially be impacted by the proposed construction. They include two Canary Island pine trees and four Paperbark trees. The trees will be protected in accordance with the .City Arborist's recommendations which have been incorporated into the attached Resolution as conditions of approval. A condition has been added to ensure that any slab for the shed is constructed on grade with no, excavation. The City Arborist has recommended that a bond be posted for the full value of the protected trees in the amount of $41,980. FCC Requirements . Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has exclusive jurisdiction over RF emissions from personaf wireless antenna facilities. Pursuant to its authority under federal law, the FCC has established rules to regulate the safety of emissions from these facilities. The applicant has provided a cumulative RF exposure report, which concludes that the RF energy is. well below the Maximum Permissible Exposure limit established by the FCC. This report is part of attachment #5. Application No. CUP07 -0001; 12768 Saratoga Avenue Since the applicant has documented compliance with federal exposure limits, under the Telecommunication Act, the City can evaluate and regulate only the aesthetic aspects of wireless installations. Any concerns regarding health or safety aspects of the wireless sites are not within the purview of the Planning Commission. Conditional Use Permit Findings Staff believes the proposed project is consistent with Conditional Use Permit findings stated in City Code Section 15- 55.070 and furthermore believes they can be made in the affirmative. The text and follow -up discussion regarding each finding is below. a) The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zoning district in which the site is located. The project meets this finding in that the proposed antennas will improve the quality of service provided by the wireless carrier.. The location for the project is appropriate, as it will be well concealed within the church cross, and the equipment cabinet will be enclosed in a shed. The shed will not be visible from the front of the property or from Saratoga Avenue. b) The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project meets this finding in that the wireless carrier has submitted a report, which concludes that the proposed site will comply with the FCC's current standard for limiting exposure to RF energy. Since the FCC has jurisdiction on the health aspects of wireless sites that are demonstrated to comply with FCC guidelines for emissions, the proposal is assumed to not be detrimental to the public health and welfare. As conditioned, the cross and the shed will meet applicable requirements of the Building Code. Therefore, this finding can be made in the affirmative. c) The proposed establishment will comply with all applicable provisions of the Saratoga Municipal Code. The project meets this finding in that the proposal complies with all provisions of the City Code. d) The proposed conditional use will not adversely affect existing or anticipated uses in the immediate neighborhood, and will not adversely affect surrounding properties or the occupants thereof. The project meets this finding in that the proposed wireless facility will not adversely affect immediate uses and properties in the vicinity, as the proposed antennas will be well concealed within the roof and cross of the church and the equipment cabinet will be enclosed in a shed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the proposed wireless facility (Application CUP07 -0001) by adopting the attached Resolution. • Application No. CUP07 -0001; 12768 Saratoga Avenue ATTACHMENTS 1: Resolution of Approval for CUP07 -0001 2. Neighbor Notification forms 3. Arborist Report dated December 17,2007 4. Affidavit of mailing notices, public hearing notice, mailing labels, and newspaper publication 5. Project Related Materials ■ Coverage maps Color photosimulations of proposal ■ Radio frequencies report 6. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A" • • Attachment 1 u r� RESOLUTION NO. Application No. CUP07 -0001 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA MetroPCS 12768 Saratoga Avenue Antenna and equipment cabinet WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a wireless facility on the roof of an existing church. The system is comprised of antennas concealed within a new cross and an equipment cabinet. The site is located in a Residential Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds the proposed project consisting of the installation of an equipment cabinet and concealed antennas is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 of the Public Resources Code (CEQA); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that all of the findings for approval required . Within Article 15 -55. of the City Code can be made in the affirmative. The following is a discussion of each of the findings: a) The proposed location. of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zoning district in which the site is located. The project meets this finding in that the proposed antennas will improve the quality of service provided by the wireless carrier. The location for the project is appropriate, as it will be well concealed within the church cross, and the equipment cabinet will be - enclosed in a shed. The shed will not be visible from the front of the property or from Saratoga Avenue. b) The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project meets this finding in that the wireless carrier has submitted a report, which concludes that the proposed site will comply with the FCC's current standard for limiting exposure to RF energy. Since the FCC has jurisdiction on the health aspects of wireless sites that are demonstrated to comply with FCC guidelines for emissions, the proposal is assumed to not be detrimental to the public health and welfare. 'As conditioned, the cross and the shed will meet applicable requirements of the Building Code. Therefore, this finding can be made in the affirmative. 12768 Saratoga Avenue; CUP07 -0001; MetroPCS c) The proposed establishment will comply with all applicable provisions of the Saratoga Municipal Code. The project meets this finding in that the proposal complies with all provisions of the City Code. d) The proposed conditional use will not adversely affect existing or anticipated uses in the immediate neighborhood, and will not adversely affect surrounding properties or the occupants thereof. The project meets this finding in that the proposed wireless facility will not adversely affect immediate uses and properties in the vicinity, as the proposed antennas will be well concealed within the roof and cross of the church and the equipment cabinet will be enclosed in a shed. Now, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the proposed use and exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the application for a Conditional Use Permit approval is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: PERMANENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL There are no permanent conditions of approval for this project. PLANNING 1. All conduits /cable trays on exterior fagade of building shall be painted to match the exterior of the building. The paint shall be maintained in perpetuity and the exterior of the building shall _ not be cluttered with cabling, connection hardware, or other components. 2. The shed that will house the equipment and the existing shed at the rear of the, church building shall be painted to match exterior of church building. The paint shall be maintained in perpetuity. 3. Curb stops shall be installed in lieu of the pipe bollards shown on plans. No pipe bollards are part of this approval. 4. The curb stops shall be installed in a manner such that the ability to park in spaces adjacent to or near the curb stops is not impaired. 5. The applicant shall landscape the area adjacent to and near the area of work in accordance with a plan subject to approval by the Community Development Director. The landscaping shall be compatible with the existing trees on the parcel and shall be installed prior to final inspection. 6. No additional sheds shall be permitted on the property without Planning Commission approval. 7. Any slab for the shed shall be constructed on grade with no excavation. 2 12768 Saratoga Avenue; CUP07 -0001; MeiroPCS 8. Prior to issuance of final inspection, the applicant shall submit a noise assessment study prepared by a qualified acoustical consultant to verifying that the wireless facility complies with the City's noise ordinance. 9. Prior to issuance of final inspection the applicant's Radio Frequency Engineer shall conduct a test of the Radio Frequency (RF) emission levels and submit a letter of verification that actual radiation levels generated by the facility meet current Federal standards. 10. The Planning Commission shall retain continuing jurisdiction over the Conditional Use Permit and may, at any time, modify, delete or impose any new conditions of the permit to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare. 11. Any intensification of this use shall require approval of an amended Conditional Use Permit. 12. . If the subject site is decommissioned in the future, all antennas and related equipment shall be removed within thirty (30) days of cessation of operation. - J13. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, detailed construction plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division for Zoning Clearance to verify consistency with the approved Exhibit "A" plans. The construction drawings shall incorporate a.signed copy of this Resolution as a separate plan page and shall incorporate a plan showing proposed landscaping adjacent to-and near the area of work. 14. The p P ro osed use shall at all times operate in compliance with all regulations of the City and/or other agencies having jurisdictional authority over the use pertaining to, but not limited to, health, sanitation, safety, radio frequency and water quality issues. CITY ARBORIST 15. Any slab for the shed shall be constructed on grade with no excavation. 16. The entire arborist report dated December 17, 2007, shall be incorporated into the set of final construction plans. The Tree Inventory Table and the tree fencing map showing locations of trees shall be included. J 17. Tree protective fencing shall be installed as shown on the tree fencing map and established prior to any grading or the arrival of construction equipment or materials on site. It shall be comprised of six -foot high chain link fencing mounted on eight -foot tall, two -inch diameter galvanized posts, driven 24 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout construction until final inspection. Tree protective fencing shall be inspected and approved by the City Arborist prior to obtaining building division permits. . 18. Owner shall - provide a tree protection bond, in the amount of $41,980, prior to obtaining building division permits. The bond shall remain in place for. the duration of the construction project to ensure the protection of the trees. Once the project has been completed and inspected by the City Arborist, the bond can be released. 3 • 12768 Saratoga Avenue; CUP07 -0001; MetroPCS 19. Pits for bore holes shall be hand dug for the first 2%2 feet. Roots measuring two inches or larger shall be retained and tunneled underneath or worked around. Roots measuring less than two inches may be cut with a sharp pruning instrument. 20. No trenching shall occur under the canopies of trees #2 and 3 for the installation of conduit. Instead, the roots shall be tunneled under at a minimum of 2%z feet below grade. 21. Any pruning of trees on site must be performed by a licensed tree contractor under the supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. 22. The disposal of harmful products, including but not limited to, chemicals, paint rinse water, fuel, cement rinse water, herbicides, or other materials, is prohibited beneath tree canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath tree canopies. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 23. Applicant shall comply with all Santa Clara County Fire Department requirements. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 24. No new overhead lines are permitted. 25. Encroachment Permit shall be issued by the Public Works Department for work in public right -of -way prior to commencement of work. CITY ATTORNEY 26. Applicant agrees to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. Section 2. A Building Permit must be issued and construction or business operations commenced within thirty -six (36) months from the date of adoption of this Resolution or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15- 55.080 and 15 -90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, this 13th day of February 2008 by the following roll call vote: 4 12768 Saratoga Avenue; CUP07 -0001; MetroPCS AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Joyce Hlava Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: John F. Livingstone, AICP Secretary, Planning Commission This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the, approved terms and conditions and agrees" to fully conform to and comply with said tems and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date 5 r� �__jl • Attachment 1 2 • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form , PROJECT ADDRESS: Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like Al provide of the adjacent an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be. changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga 's Planning Division at any time. to review anychanges that. may occur. The City of Saratoga asks -that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact.the City of Saratoga at 408 -868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My� si p ature below certifies that I am aware. of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Date: V 4 �/ Neighbor Name: 7 Signature: Neighbor Address: -S C41 Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets.if necessary' ): Applicant Name: tt�� f LPiJ�n/ �' ` P LS Date: 9 110 Application Number: �i�J�� �� Planning Department City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 P: Torms & proceduresW eighbor notification. doc City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 12,1 &KR�vaA AVCMIAV Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourse f with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be. changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. M Y signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed � the preliminary project plans. -7 Neighbor Name: 44, /�1 Date: Signature: Neighbor Address: a n U r 17l, Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project. I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): f Applicant Name: t+a PGS Date: Application Number: �i(/��' W01 City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10129106 P: (Forms & Procedureslneighbor notification.doc City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 1 Sa*74 1kJCMtAV Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you farriiliarize.yourself wiih the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward.. You may contact the City. of Saratoga 's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and, a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an oportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with.the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: ��`. � ,� � � .;- Date: _ Signature: r Neighbor Address: p / A loge C2 2l l t� I �a i,UvL= Neighbor Phone #:C J If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary). Applicant Name: VIAL %iii✓ 0--f4" PLS Date: Application Nuinber: UAM- --OW I Planning Department City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 P: (Forms & ProceduresWeighbor notification. doc • • • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 3' a*- R+-0aA cI Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to .review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from. the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that . may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 an d speak with the assigned project planner. M Y signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed gn the preliminary Proj ect plans. Neighbor Name:` Date: 1 // . 6 Signature: f V� ���3y✓%�.vT Neighbor Address: N17 e eighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): F Applicant Name: I "i:)W (/5 Date: 9 Application Number:/ 000 City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 P: (Forms & Procedures Ineighbor notification. doc City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 27 SaKu -HM �Mu� Dear Neighbor, l I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project: I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are ng,ELd1'11LNARY OAILY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga 's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that. may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that -they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned-project planner. . My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the prel;Nam ary pro ct plans. NeighboCk eh- Date: Signatur -,LJ Neighbor Address: v r q. Neighbor Phone #: �d ✓`G "� 70O If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: K {i �' t%Pi -W t' `'� P LS Date: Application Number: Cal Planning Department City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 P.•IForms & Procedureslneighbor notification. doc • r� L ; Dear Neighbor, l I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project: I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are ng,ELd1'11LNARY OAILY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga 's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that. may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that -they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned-project planner. . My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the prel;Nam ary pro ct plans. NeighboCk eh- Date: Signatur -,LJ Neighbor Address: v r q. Neighbor Phone #: �d ✓`G "� 70O If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: K {i �' t%Pi -W t' `'� P LS Date: Application Number: Cal Planning Department City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 P.•IForms & Procedureslneighbor notification. doc • r� City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review. the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbrs across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga 's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that. may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor. to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. M Y signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed �' the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: v (1 % hn Date: 1\ to C) Signature:. Neighbor Address: f � �5U70 Neighbor Phone #: L402 --q7 F ' g 03 If.I have any initial concerns with the project I may list.them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: Ft_F `t ViRw Win PGS Date: 9 Application Number: iA�,PO�' owl City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10114106 P: (Forms & Procedures Weighbor notification. doc City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form , PROJECT ADDRESS: Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard Ciry Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and maybe. changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that. may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor . to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the the project, you may contact the assigned project planner. . My signature ature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. y Neighbor Name: � f ✓ E 7�' '. t Date• i Signature �t�':� ri✓ Neighbor Address: Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): i � (�j ; �i f "E.� .� G,1 ' L-.: �ti,y�.fr•�v'yiNit•.� -. `'1G -' Grt �k-.�� >,�L°,r /Li Applicant Name: t��wPZP1D�✓ r f,+" PLS Date: 9 -1 Application Number: / 0001 City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 P: (Forms & procedures Ineighbor notification. doc • • • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: I I M Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as. the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that . may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of .Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak. with the assigned project planner. M Y signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plants. / Neighbor Name: ��, 5A c') ; +"� �" <<E c�s' Date: -7 Signature: Neighbor Address: �7O Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: VfJkFt'.Ppw JA ttry PL `7 S Date: I Application Number: / 7' owl City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 P.•IForms & Procedureslneighbor notification. doc City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form , PROJECT ADDRESS:-10 � �� Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's.Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set. of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans' are preliminary and maychange. a 408-8,68-122 2 and speak with the the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the prelinninaryyroject plans. Date: �� ! Neighbor Name. / { Signature: Neighbor Address: , � f Neighbor Phone #: i% If I have an y initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name:; 1�1 t%Pi��i✓ f P �S Date: Application Number. Lma: � Planning Department City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 P: lForms & Procedures lneighbor notifcation.doc City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: I7i�I iP� 8a* Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plan, s are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga 's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that . may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set.of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. M Y signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: Date: Signature:'- Neighbor Address: �f Neighbor Phone #: ((— :? v 7 If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): ir Applicant Name: 1 1[4 fqp Vii✓ t' ttby PCS Date: -1 Application Number: �i(�— 0001 City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 P:1Forms & Procedures Weighbor notification. doc City. of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form , PROJECT ADDRESS: I Z7 &KR�Voo� Avcm Dear Neighbor,. Jam proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a. decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's-Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and. a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: iv -� ilk =�•��+ i�. f' ;a z+'—i t tzzSDate: l i, fi L�z-z t7 Signature: Neighbor Address: e_:4P444'). 4-1 t6 - C. )Q— G',+ '_V c; '7UNei hbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): t i�t= rte. - C �7 'L— u 1';, c_ Applicant Name: t� Pt%PiDt�i✓ P LS Date: -' le Application Number: W 07 ow City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 P: (Forms & Procedures Ineighbor. notification. doc City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: I �i�I � � aA Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the . proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and maybe changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that . may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. M Y signature ature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. ,� y Neighbor Name:. -L' ��% ��� Date: Signature: Neighbor Address: Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): .J - t ,L[{y(r !1k r Applicant Name: KtIP ►��/ o� PLS Date: � " j' Application Number: City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 P.•IForms & Procedures Weighbor notification. doc City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. . Theseplans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be. changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City- of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and ratoya a 408- 681222 and speak with the the project, you may contact the City of S g assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. .�� ff Neighbor Name: ► ,-�� Date: • --- —, Signature: -- Neighbor Address: , Neighbor Phone If I have any initial concerns with the project i may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): I p Applicant Name: t� Vhf t%P iii✓ P LS Date: i Application Number:J�� I City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10129106 P: (Forms & procedureslneighbor notification. doc • • • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: I2,1 (4 M/Muli Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be. changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with .the. assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: R-R Date: I Gam' Signature: Neighbor Address: J �i VZ�t („A eighbor Phone #: g ! r t If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): I p n Applicant Name: t�V�f iJ�i✓ J `t+n PLS Date: 1 Application Number: W01— owl City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 P: (Forms & Procedures Weighbor notification.doc City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 121 A Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These-plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be. changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an. opportunity to review the proposal. Please be in advised that these plans are preliminary , and may change. If you have further interest the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: �2i Date: Signature, Neighbor Address: , Neighbor Phone;#:O If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below: My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): \ u - t vV � Applicant Name: �1 h 1 �.O1Jfn/ f `fh" e c5 Date: i 1 tN Application Number: Planning Department • r City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 P: (Forms & Procedures lneighbor notification. doc City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 7 � i/t 7 hJFM1AV Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and maybe changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the, assigned project planner. Mysgn signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. 4- Date: Neighbor Name:.--'l Signature: Neighbor Address: i t Neighbor Phone #: If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): MApplicant Name: t- tiPiDPi✓ �n `f+a PLS Date: Application Number: �� 0001 City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 P: (Forms & Procedureslneighbor notification. doc City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form. PROJECT ADDRESS: Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project.. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARYONLY and maybe. changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga 's Planning Division at and; time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga, asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: E '6? t- i i !lo V l 1 l Signature: Neighbor Address: ��r /- r v .S( ) %i) Neighbor Phone #: Date: 9 If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if.necessary): Applicant Name: t' ` � tbT PGS Date: 9 -1 Application Number: OAP07— 0001 City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 P.:IForms & Pr•oceduresWeighbor notification.doc • • • E City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 2 7 fax u I-�iNl l/LP� Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be. changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. M Y signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed � the preliminary project plans. l Neighbor Name: '{�1 T Date: I l 1 Signature: Neighbor Address: LA �� %tiNeighbor �17�� Phone #: . If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): A Applicant Name: OVhT P LS Date: 9 Application Number:/�� I City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 P: (Forms & Procedureslneighbor notification. doc • L-] • Community Development Department City of Saratoga . 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, Cafrfomia 95070 12768 Saratoga Avenue ARBORIST REPORT APN 386 -14 -016 Owner: Westhope Church INTRODUCTION Application #: ARB07 -0045 December 17, 2007 Prepared by Kate Bear, City Arborist Phone (408) 868 -1276 MetroPCS has submitted plans to the city to install a cell phone tower concealed in a cross at the Westhope Church located at 12768 Saratoga Avenue. Six trees potentially impacted by construction were inventoried for this report. Data for each tree is included in a Tree Inventory Table at the end of this report. Tree locations are marked on the attached copy of Sheet LS 1, Survey. Plans reviewed for this report include Sheets T -1, Cover Sheet; T -2, General Notes; LS1— Survey; A -1, Site Plan; A -2 and A -3, Enlarged Project Area; and Sheets A -4, A -5 Elevations dated June 21, 2007 by Michael Wilk Architecture. SITE OBSERVATIONS, PLAN REVIEW AND TECHNICAL DISCUSSION Six trees protected by City Ordinance and potentially impacted by construction were inventoried for this report. They. include two Canary Island pines ( #1 and 2), and four Paperbark trees (#3 — 6). Tunnels for the conduit should be at least 2.5 feet below grade. Trenches should not be used under the canopies of trees #2 and 3. Instead, the conduit should be placed in tunnels under the roots. Bore pits should be hand dug for the first 2.5 feet. If roots are encountered, the pit should be. adjusted so that any roots measuring 2 inches or more is retained. Roots measuring less than two inches may be cut using a sharp pruning tool. Per City Ordinance 15- 50.080, a bond in the amount of $41,980, which is equal to 100% of the total appraised value of trees #I — 6, is required. Appraisal values are calculated according to the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 91" Edition, published by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), 2000. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. This entire report, including the Tree Inventory Table and the attached map showing locations of trees, shall be incorporated into the set of final landscape plans. 2. Tree protective fencing shall be installed as shown on the attached map and established prior to any grading or the arrival of construction equipment or materials on site. It shall be comprised of six -foot high chain link fencing mounted on eight -foot tall, two -inch diameter galvanized posts, Page 1 of 2 12768 Saratoga Avenue. driven 24 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet apart. Once. established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout construction until final inspection. Tree protective fencing shall be inspected and approved by the City Arborist prior to obtaining building division permits. 3. Owner shall provide a tree protection bond, in the amount of $41,980, prior to obtaining building division permits. The bond shall remain in place for the duration of the construction .project to ensure the protection of the trees. Once the project has been completed and inspected by the City Arborist, the bond can be released. 4. Pits for bore Boles shall be hand dug for the first 2%s feet. Roots measuring two inches or larger shall be retained and tunneled underneath or worked around. Roots measuring less than two inches may be cut with a sharp pruning instrument. 5. No trenching shall occur under the canopies of trees #2 and 3 for the installation of conduit. Instead, the roots shall be tunneled under at a minimum of 2%2 feet below grade. 6. Any pruning of trees on site must be performed by a licensed tree contractor under the supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. 7. The disposal of harmful products, including but not limited to, chemicals, paint rinse water, fuel, cement rinse water, herbicides, or other materials, is prohibited beneath tree canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath tree canopies. Attachments: Tree Bond Form Tree Inventory Table Map Showing Tree Protective Fencing Locations • Page 2 of 2 TREE INVENTORY TABLE • Replacement Tree Values 15 gallon = $150 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 48 inch box = $5,000 52 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,00 Should any tree listed above become damaged owner will be required to repair the damage. Should any tree listed above be removed owner will be required to replace that tree with trees equal in value to its assessed value. 12768 Saratoga Ave December 17, 2007 C3 a b Rf u O o p •o r=+ w b N a o o 3 h ° 0 o 0 o .�i ° o w a w U 'v^ a Cd o W w b 3 oo 3 V cd �° 4.) 1-4 W) q > Q' b p II ~' it ° U o ° a 3 >~ ° A,° Uo wo �,on cao r �- `�° 'in .° . a TREE NO. TREE NAME w C n O 0 z ° O a a ¢ Canary Island Pine . 1 Pinus canariensis 13.8 15 90 70 Good High 2 $3,520 Canary Island Pine 2 Pinus canariensis 13.3 15 70 70 Good High 2 $2,860 Paperbark Tree 3 Melaleuca linari olia 17.8 15 80 70 Good High 2 $7,600 Paperbark Tree 4 Melaleuca linari olia 18.2 15 80 70 Good Hiizh 2 $8,400 Paperbark Tree 5 Melaleuca linari olia 18.5 15 80 70 Good High 2 $8,600 Paperbark Tree 6 Melaleuca linari olia 20.9 20 80 70 Good High 2 $11;000 tal Appraised Value $41,980 • Replacement Tree Values 15 gallon = $150 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 48 inch box = $5,000 52 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,00 Should any tree listed above become damaged owner will be required to repair the damage. Should any tree listed above be removed owner will be required to replace that tree with trees equal in value to its assessed value. 12768 Saratoga Ave December 17, 2007 • 4� 7 C� b•A O i., t �C 00 N r� WATER t, PVC o P� e P PP, Attachment 4 • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, Denise Kaspar being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over. the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga. Planning Commission on the 25`h day of January, 2008, that I deposited 139 notices in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with.postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to -wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15- 45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property described as: Address: 12768 Saratoga Avenue APN: 386 -14 -016 that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. Denise Kaspar Advanced Listing Services • • City of Saratoga Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 408- 868 -1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Saratoga's Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Wednesday, the 13th day of February 2008, at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Theater located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. The public hearing agenda item is stated below. Details of this item are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. Please consult the City website at www.saratoga.ca.us regarding Friday office closures. APPLICATION /ADDRESS: #CUP07-0001 — 12768 Saratoga Avenue APPLICANT /OWNER: MetroPCS / Presbytery of San Jose APN: 386 -14 -016 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to locate a wireless facility at the Presbyterian Church near the intersection of Cox Avenue and Saratoga Avenue. The project consists of a new cross structure with concealed antennas and a new equipment cabinet enclosed in a shed. The lot size is approximately 3.74 acres and the site is zoned R -1- 10,000. . All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. In order to be.;included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed no later than Tuesday February 05, 2008. A site visit will be held on the day preceding the hearing date listed above as part of the standard Site Visit Committee agenda. Site visits occur between 3:30 and 5:00 p.m. The site visit is open to the public. The Site Visit Committee will convene at the City Hall parking lot at 3:30 p.m. on the day preceding the hearing and visit the site listed above and may visit other sites as well. For more information please contact the Community Development Department at 408 868 -1222 or review the Site Visit Agenda on the City Website at www.saratoga.ca.us. This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor's office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out -of —date information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all residents potentially affected by a project. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Shweta Bhatt Associate Planner sbhatt(, saiatoga_ca_us (408) 868 -1266 January 25, 2008 500' Ownership Prepared For: 386 -14 -016 . PRESBYTERY OF SAN JOSE 12768 SARATOGA AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4147 386 -14 -011 PRINCE OF PEACE EVANG LUTH CH OF OR CURRENT OWNER 12770 SARATOGA AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4147 .386 -14 -016, 018 PRESBYTERY OF SAN JOSE OR CURRENT OWNER 12850 SARATOGA AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4147 386 -14 -027 DELORA SANFILIPPO OR CURRENT OWNER 18809 COX AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4100 386 -14 -012 SARATOGA COURT INC OR CURRENT OWNER 2000 CORPORATE RDG 925 MC LEAN VA 22102 -7861 386 -14 -023 ROBERT TERESI ORCURRENT OWNER 117 LOMA VISTA CT LOS GATOS CA 95032 -2419 386 -14 -028 JOHN & CAROLE FREITAS LLC OR CURRENT OWNER 3030 MOORPARK AVE SAN JOSE CA 95128 -2518 386 -15 -025 386 -15 -026 RONALD J & ARLINE SCHOENGOLD PBR SERVICES LLC OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 19000 SARATOGA GLEN PL 18990 SARATOGA GLEN PL SARATOGA CA 95070 -3550 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3550 386 -15 -028 386 -15 -029 DAVID E & MARJORIE MCEACHRON HENRY BOSE OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18966 SARATOGA GLEN PL 18944 SARATOGA GLEN PL SARATOGA CA 95070 -3550 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3550 386 -15 -031 SALAH A & SHAYESTEH AHMED OR CURRENT OWNER 18943 PALO OAKS CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -3521 386 -15 -034 CHRIS E & LESLIE VASQUEZ OR CURRENT OWNER 18979 PALO OAKS CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -3521 386 -15 -032 GEORGE & GLORIA JANAC OR CURRENT OWNER 12832 STAR RIDGE CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -6511 386 -15 -035 BARR MAURICE R OR CURRENT OWNER 5231 BROKEN LANCE CT SAN JOSE CA 95136 386 -14 -014 BARBARA BAKER OR CURRENT OWNER 10 DAWN HILL DR SANDY UT 84092 -4901 386 -14 -026 DAVID J MORRISON OR CURRENT OWNER 18805 COX AVE 210 SARATOGA.CA 95070 -6616 386 -14 -029 SARATOGA CITY OF 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE SARATOGA CA 95070 386 -15 -027 DINUCCI OR CURRENT OWNER 18976 SARATOGA GLEN PL SARATOGA CA 95070 -3550 386 -15 -030 CHUNG T & CAROLYN FUNG OR CURRENT OWNER 18931 PALO OAKS CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -3521 386 -15 -033 BARBARA A DEZUR OR CURRENT OWNER 18967 PALO OAKS CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -3521 386 -15 -036 JOHN E MALLET OR CURRENT OWNER 18993 PALO OAKS CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -3521 386 -15 -037 386 -15 -038 386 -15 -039 ERIC T�& NOEL BREWER LUIS T & CLARA WU ALBERT TENG OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18994 PALO OAKS CT 18972 PALO OAKS CT 11597.CEDAR SPRING CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -3521 SARATOGA CA 95070 -3521 CUPERTINO CA 95014 -5139 • • • 3.86 -16 -001 HAROLD & CHARLENE MANDELL OR CURRENT OWNER SARATOGA GLEN PL TOGA CA 95070 -3549 386 -16 -004 GARY B & MARCIA FARISS OR CURRENT OWNER 18983 SARATOGA GLEN PL SARATOGA CA 95070 -3549 386 -16 -035 MARYLOU A DAVIS OR CURRENT OWNER 18972 MELLON DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3518 386 -16 -038 GERALD C & IDIA LI OR CURRENT OWNER 1186 MATTERHORN DR SAN JOSE CA 95132 -2731 386 -17 -001 DAVID & MARSHA ROBERTSON OR CURRENT OWNER 18959 MELLON DR S TOGA CA 95070 -3517 3 -17 -030 SANJAY & SHALINI GIDWANI OR CURRENT OWNER 18925 MELLON DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3517 386 -17 -052 ANDREW J & ISOBEL MORRISH OR CURRENT OWNER 12657 SUN VALLEY CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -4171 386 -58 -001. FRANCES CULLEN OR CURRENT OWNER 18931 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4167 386 -58 -004 ANDREA BRYAN OR CURRENT OWNER 18925 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4167 007 & ANNE GRINER OR CURRENT OWNER 18919 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4167 386-16-002 ELLEN MASTMAN OR CURRENT OWNER 18951 SARATOGA GLEN PL SARATOGA CA 95070 -3549 386 -16 -005 GERHARD & KARINA HOOG OR CURRENT OWNER 18999 SARATOGA GLEN PL SARATOGA CA 95070 -3549 386 -16 -036 BRIAN E & ELIZABETH COX OR CURRENT OWNER 18958 MELLON DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3518 386 -16 -051 STEPHEN F & SUSAN CRIMI OR CURRENT OWNER 12637 RADOYKA DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3528 386 -17 -002 HOLST FAMILY TRUST OR CURRENT OWNER 12638 RADOYKA DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3527 386 -17 -031 ANTON L & HELEN SEIDL OR CURRENT OWNER 18941 MELLON DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3517 386 -17 -053 ALEXANDER & MAHTAB BRUDNY OR CURRENT OWNER 12663 SUN VALLEY CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -4171 386 -58 -002 TING WU OR CURRENT OWNER 18929 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4167 386 -58 -005 KARL E & LINDA JENSEN OR CURRENT OWNER 18923 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4167 386 -58 -008 MARILYN PORTER OR CURRENT OWNER 18917 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4167 386 -16 -003 MARTIN A & NANCY NEWMAN OR CURRENT OWNER 18967 SARATOGA GLEN PL SARATOGA CA 95070 -3549 386 -16 -034 STEVEN W BANBURY OR CURRENT OWNER 18986 MELLON DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3518 386 -16 -037 SAUL & RHODA GOLDSTONE OR CURRENT OWNER 18944 MELLON DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3518 386 -16 -052 UMA & PRASHANTH VADLAKONDA OR CURRENT OWNER 18987 MELLON DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3516 386 -17 -003 MARK A & DANIELA BITTER OR CURRENT OWNER 12618 RADOYKA DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3527 386 -17 -051 JOHN SAICH OR CURRENT OWNER 331 CARLTON.AVE LOS GATOS CA 95032 -2602 386 -17 -054 NORIKO & OSAMU TAKAGI OR CURRENT OWNER 12669 SUN VALLEY CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -4171 386 -58 -003 JOVITA CARPIO OR CURRENT OWNER 18927 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4167 386 -58 -006 BEVERLY HORTIN OR CURRENT OWNER 18921 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4167 386 -58 -009 ALEXA J FLETCHER OR CURRENT OWNER 18915 SARA PARK CIR. SARATOGA CA 95070 -4167 386 -58- 010,34,41,386 -59- 001,002,015 ROBERT L & ILDA ALLARIO OR CURRENT OWNER 14169 OKANOGAN DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5533 386 -58 -013 JOYCE A ROGGENKAMP OR CURRENT OWNER 18901 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4175 . 386 -58 -016 ERCOLE & NORMA RONCO OR CURRENT OWNER 1213 SABAL DR SAN JOSE CA 95132 -2750 386 -58 -019 YIN WANG OR CURRENT OWNER 18899 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4175 386 -58 -022 BARRY SCOTT OR CURRENT OWNER 18908 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4174 386 -58 -011 KEISUN CHAN OR CURRENT OWNER 18909 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4149 386-58-0142039,386-59-003 ROBERT L CARE OR CURRENT OWNER 18895 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4175 386 -58 -017 JEANIE H KIM OR CURRENT OWNER 18907 SARA PARK CIR , SARATOGA CA 95070 -4149 386 -58 -020 E CUNNINGHAM OR CURRENT OWNER 18962 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4166 386 -58 -023 LEONARD ROTH. OR CURRENT OWNER 18904 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4174 386 -58 -025 386 -58 -026 DAVID E & KATHLEEN BAYLY FLORENCE A FOSS - OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 3121 CONTI CT 10427 FAIRWAY LN PLEASANTON CA 94566 -2200 CARMEL CA 93923 -8034 386 -58 -028 WILLIAM A BATTAGLIA OR CURRENT OWNER 18906 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4174 386 -58 -031 STEVE T NISHIMOTO OR CURRENT OWNER 18896 SARA PARK CIR 31 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4163 386 -58 -035 DAVID RICHARDS OR CURRENT OWNER 19935 CHARTERS AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4411 386 -58 -029 JENNY CHEN OR CURRENT OWNER 18902 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4163 386 -58 -032 M F FENSTERMAKER OR CURRENT OWNER 18892 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4163 386 -58 -036 MARIA D FIGUE+ROA OR CURRENT OWNER PO BOX 2827 SARATOGA CA 95070 -0827 386 -58 -012 KELLY P BLUNDEN OR CURRENT OWNER 18905 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4149 386 -58 -015 HANNAH QUAIN OR CURRENT OWNER 18891 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4175 386 -58 -018 JEANE PATTERSON OR CURRENT OWNER 18903 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4149 386 -58 -021 MARCUS T KHOO OR CURRENT OWNER 18893 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4175 386 -58 -024 J & JACQUELINE VAN NEST OR CURRENT OWNER 19935 CHARTERS AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4411 386 -58 -027 RALPH REINKER OR CURRENT OWNER 18910 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 950704174 386 -58 -030 EASUS J VILLANO OR CURRENT OWNER 18898 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4163 386 -58- 033,020,028 ROBERT L ALLARIO OR CURRENT OWNER 14169 OKANOGAN DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -5533 386 -58 -037 EDMUND CHANG OR CURRENT OWNER 20037 SEA GULL WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -3247 386 -58 -038 386 -58 -040 386 -58 -042 THOMAS BREDIS RICHARD D SHEBS DONNA HANDA OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18953 SARA PARK CIR 267 MESQUITE RIDGE LN 18939 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4176 HENDERSON NV 89012 -3410 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4168 • • 3:86 -58 =043 DARRYL B MATSUDA OR CURRENT OWNER SARA PARK CIR TOGA CA 95070 -4168 386 -59 -006 AMOS & ELENA LI OR CURRENT OWNER 18954 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4177 386 -59 -009 LUCY KARPIK OR CURRENT OWNER 18942 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4165 386 -59 -0.12 PETER J & ANGELICA APEL OR CURRENT OWNER 18956 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4177 386 -59 -016 SHIRLEY C & RICHARD MOBILIO OR CURRENT OWNER 18964 SARA PARK CIR S TOGA CA 95070 -4166 3 -59 -019 0-5 PATRICIA NAMBA OR CURRENT OWNER 18973 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4169 386 -59 -023 IRINA VAYNSHTEYN OR CURRENT OWNER 18965 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4169 386 -59 -026 PAUL S & CATHERINE NADELL OR CURRENT OWNER 18926 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4164 386 -59 -031 CHARLOTTE HOLMDAHL OR CURRENT OWNER 18976 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4166 0 034 NNE CONENS OR CURRENT OWNER 18970 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4166 386 -59 -004 FARSHID ZARBAKHSH OR CURRENT OWNER 18938 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4165 386 -59 -007 JUDY SCOTT OR CURRENT OWNER 22093 BAXLEY CT CUPERTINO CA 95014 -4744 386 -59 -010 U LILLIAN OR CURRENT OWNER 18940 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4165 386 -59 -013 ARMIN C & ROBIN HOFSOMMER OR CURRENT OWNER 14510 A BIG BASIN WY SARATOGA CA 95070 386 -59 -017 SONIA M AGEE OR CURRENT OWNER 18966 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4166 386 -59 -021 DANIEL C & MICHELE RAPPAPORT OR CURRENT OWNER 18969 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 950704169 386 -59 -024 MARSHA PALMQUIST OR CURRENT OWNER 18920 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4164 386 -59 -027 JUDY & GEORGE HO OR CURRENT OWNER 13095 VIA ESCUELA CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -4461 386 -59 -032 JANET M HAYDEN OR CURRENT OWNER 19501 NORTHAMPTON DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -3332 386 -62 -001 JAMES M & CARA MARTIN OR CURRENT OWNER 18891 BIARRITZ LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4192 386 -59 -005 RICHARD VALENZUELA OR CURRENT OWNER 18934 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4165 386 -59 -008 MARIA F DE LEON OR CURRENT OWNER 18946 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4177 386 -59 -011 DONALD H & KATHLEEN WINNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18936 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4165 386 -59 -014 JO H BRABANT OR CURRENT OWNER 18960 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4166 386 -59 -018 ANNE C RUO OR CURRENT OWNER 1345 TURNSTONE WAY SUNNYVALE CA 94087 -3737 386 -59 -022 COLEEN P LEE -WHEAT OR CURRENT OWNER 18967 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4169 386 -59 -025 DOROTHEA NIELSON OR CURRENT OWNER 18922 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4164 386 -59 -029 BRETT CATTERALL OR CURRENT OWNER 18932 SARA PARK CIR 72 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4164 386 -59 -033 SASAN TEYMOURI OR CURRENT OWNER 18972 SARA PARK CIR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4166 386 -62 -002 MARI MATSUMOTO OR CURRENT OWNER 18883 BIARRITZ LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4192 386 -62 -003 ALI FAR OR CURRENT OWNER 18875 BIARRITZ LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4192 386 -62 -006 NORMAN A & VIRGINIA SMITH OR CURRENT OWNER 12624 BIARRITZ LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4193 386 -62 -004 386 -62 -005 BETTY J WATKINS GARY R & LOIS SCHULTZ OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18867 BIARRITZ LN 18859 BIARRITZ LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4192 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4192 386 -62 -007 386 -62 -008 J DE VERA DENISE RENOLA OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 12630 BIARRITZ LN 12636 BIARRITZ LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4193 SARATOGA CA 950704193 386 -62 -009 386 -62 -010 386 -62 -011 DANIEL H & HELEN SCHEEL JULENE R GOMEZ SUSAN SUKONICK OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 12642 BIARRITZ LN 12648 BIARRITZ LN 12654 BIARRITZ LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4193 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4193 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4193 386 -62 -012 386 -62 -013 386 -62 -014 DAVID A & JUDITH STUART TRUDE -CHEA KO SALLY N GRAY OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18831 BIARRITZ CT .18837 BIARRITZ CT 18847 BIARRITZ CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -4194 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4194 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4194 386 -62 -015 386 -62 -016 386 -62 -017 ROBERT E & DIANNE ROTH CAROL MANNING KEITH P & WENDY HARROP OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18830 BIARRITZ CT 18838 BIARRITZ CT 18846 BIARRITZ CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -4194 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4194 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4194 386 -62 -018 386 -62 -019 386 -62 -020 PAMELA L POLLACE MARGIT K CHAPMAN EDWARD PETRILLO OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18852 BIARRITZ CT 18860 BIARRITZ CT 101 AMBER OAK CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -4194 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4194 LOS GATOS CA 95032 -1370 386 -62 -021 389 -06 -012 389 -12 -017 MIKE MASOUMI EDWARD A & BARBARA HINSHAW CUPERTINO VILLAGE ASSCS LLC OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 1.9467 SARATOGA LOS GATOS RD 12901 SARATOGA AVE 489 S EL CAMINO REAL SARATOGA CA 95070 -6434 SARATOGA CA 95070-4110 SAN MATEO CA 94402 -1727 389 -12 -018 - MORTON & K GROVES OR CURRENT OWNER - 2141 AVY AVE , - MENLO PARK CA 94025 -6517 CITY OF SARATOGA ATTN: Shweta Bhatt 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE SARATOGA CA 95070. 389 -12 -019 QUITO VILLAGE ASSOCIATES LLC OR CURRENT OWNER 489 S EL CAMINO REAL SAN MATEO CA 94402 -1727 Advanced Listing Services P.O Box 2593 Dana Point CA 92624 • General Notices NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF ROBERT L CHAMBERS aka ROBERT LEROY CHAMBERS CASE NO. 1-08-PR-162592 To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors. contingent credi- tors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will of estate, or both of ROBERT L. CHAMBERS aka ROBERT LEROY CHAMBERS A PETITION has been filed by JAMES H. CHAMBERS in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. THE PETITION requests that JAMES H. CHAMBERS be appointed as personal repre- sentative to administer the estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests the decedent's WILL and codi- cils. if anv, be admitted to probate. The will and any codicils ate available for examination in the file kept by the court. THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. (This author- ity will allow the personal re enta to take many wtive ithout obtaining roval. Before Lak. in ve ry important ortant fioweve . [he p er- Banal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an inter- ested person files an objec- tion to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority. A HEARING on the petition will be held on FEBRUARY 14, 2008, 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 15 located at 191 North First St., San Jose, CA 95113. IF YOU OBJECT to the granti- ng of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the deceased, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal repre. sentative appointed by the court within four months from the date of first issuance of letters as provid. ed in section 9100 of the California Probate Code. The time for filing claims will not expire before four months from the hearing date noticed above. YOU MAY EXAMINE the file kept by the court. If you are a person interested in the estate, you may file with the court a formal Request for Special Notice of the filing of 0 ory and appraisal of sets or of any peti- , Legal,fidvertisingC tion or account as provided in section 1250 of the California Probate Code. A Request for Special Notice form is available from the court clerk. Attorney for petitioner: CHARLES G. STEPHENSON (BAR NO. 035516) 235 MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 1035 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 415 - 705.5300 (Pub SN 1/23, 1/30, 2/6) 3RD AMENDED NOTICE OF PETITION TO ADMINISTER ESTATE OF ALFRED JOSEPH MERNONE aka ALFRED). MERNONE CASE NO. 1-08-PR-161970 To all heirs, beneficiaries, creditors, contingent credi- tors, and persons who may otherwise be interested in the will or estate, or both of ALFRED JOSEPH MERNONE aka ALFRED 1• MERNONE A PETITION has been filed by KEVIN MERNONE AND GLENN MERNONE in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. THE PETITION requests that KEVIN MERNONE AND GLENN MERNONE be appointed as personal repre- sentative to administer the estate of the decedent. THE PETITION requests the decedent's WILL and codi- cils, if any, be admitted to probate. ate. The wilt and any codicils are available for examination in the file kept by the court. THE PETITION requests authority to administer the estate under the Independent Administration .of Estates Act. (This author- ity will allow the personal representative to take many actions without obtaining court approval. Before tak- ing certain very important actions, however, the per- sonal representative will be required to give notice to interested persons unless they have waived notice or consented to the proposed action.) The independent administration authority will be granted unless an inter. ested person files an objec- tion to the petition and shows good cause why the court should not grant the authority. A HEARING on the petition will be held on FEBRUARY 11, 2008, 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 15 located at 191 North First St., San lose, CA 95113. IF YOU OBJECT to the granti- ng of the petition, you should appear at the hearing and state your objections or file written objections with the court before the hearing. Your appearance may be in person or by your attorney. IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a contingent creditor of the deceased, you must file your claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal repre- sentative appointed by the court within four months from the date of first issuance of letters as provid- ed in section 9100 of the California Probate Code. The time for filing claims will not expire before Four months court, you may be limited to Saratoga Municipal Code approved by the Planning NOTICE Of TRUSTEE'S SALE expressed or implied, from the hearing dale . raising only those issues you Section 15-45.060. Commission on July 11, 2007 YOU ARE IN DEFAULT regarding title, possession, noticed above. or someone else raised at APPLICATION # The proposal includes UNDER A DEED OF or encumbrances, to pay YOU MAY EXAMINE the rite the public hearing(s) CUP07.0001 (386.14.016) demolition of the existing TRUST; DATED 10/25/2005 the remaining principal sum kept by the court. If you are described in this notice, or in Metro PCS, 12768 Saratoga 2,364 sq. ft. residence. The UNLESS YOU TAKE ACTION of the note(s) secured by a person interested in the written correspondence Avenue - The applicant is maximum proposed impervi- TO PROTECTYOUR PROPER- said Deed of Trust, with estate, you may file with the delivered to the Saratoga requesting Conditional Use ous coverage is 35% of the TY, IT MAY BE SOLD AT A interest thereon, as provided court a formal Request for Planning Commission at, or Permit approval to locale a site. The maximum height of PUBLIC SALE. IF YOU NEED in said note(s), advances, Special Notice of the filing of prior to, the public hearing. wireless . facility at the the proposed buildings is 26 AN EXPLANATION OF THE under the terms of said an inventory and appraisal of In order to be included in the Presbyterian Church near the - feet. The lot size is 45,784 NATURE OF THE PROCEED- Deed of Trust, fees, charges estate assets or of any peti- Planning Commission's infor- intersection of Cox Avenue square feel, and the site is ING AGAINST YOU, YOU and expenses of the tion or account as provided mation packets, written and Saratoga Avenue. The zoned RS- 40,000. SHOULD CONTACT A Trustee and of the trusts in section 1250 of the communications should be project consists of a new (Pub SN 1/30) LAWYER. created by said Deed of California Probate Code. A filed on or before the cross structure with con- On 2/5/2008 at 10:00 AM Trust. The total amount Request for Special Notice Tuesday, a week before the cealed antennas and a new WEST VALLEY-MISSION First American Loanstar of the unpaid balance of the form is available from the meeting. equipment cabinet enclosed COMMUNITY COLLEGE Trustee Services, as duly obligation secured by the court clerk. A site visit will be held on the in a shed. The lot size is DISTRICT NOTICE appointed Trustee under and property to be sold and Attorney for petitioner: — day preceding the hearing approximately 3.74 acres At the Special Board Meeting pursuant to Deed of Trust reasonable estimated costs, MATTHEW A. CROSBY, date listed above as part of and the site is zoned R -1- held on Wednesday, January recorded 11102/2005. as expenses and advances C5B #070524 the standard Site Visit 10,000. 23, 2008, the West Valley. Instrument No. 18654600, in at the time of the initial 2785 PARK AVENUE Committee agenda. Site vis- APPLICATION # Mission Community College book , page , of Official publication of the Notice of SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 its occur between 3:30 and MOD07 -0003, CUPOB -0001 District Board of Trustees Records in the office of the Sale is $1,040,60791 . 408. 370.7500 5:00 p.m. The site visit is (517.22-072) Arimilli, 15400 provisionally appointed Mr. County Recorder of Santa The beneficiary under (Pub SN 1/23, 1130.2/6) open to the public. The Site Peach Hill Road: - The appli. Wade Ellis to fill the vacancy Clara County, State of said Deed of Trust Visit Committee will convene cant requests a Conditional left by the passing of Trustee California. Executed by: heretofore executed and at the City Hall parking lot at Use Permit for the construc- Don Cordero On December 9, Mary L. Girardot, will sell at delivered to the undersigned 3:30 p.m. on the day preced- tion of an eight foot tall, 97 2007. The seat will be filled public auction to highest a written Declaration of GGity Ly ing the hearing and visit the square feet Cabana within Permanently in the next gen- bidder for cash, cashier's Default and Demand for site listed above and may the rear yard setback and eral election in November check /cash equivalent or Sale, and a written Notice egos visit other sites as well. For modifications to . an 2008• other form of payment of Default and Election to more information please approved Design Review Unless a petition calling for a authorized by 2924h(b), Sell. contact the Community application. Modifications special election, containing a - (payable at time of sale The undersigned caused NOTICE OF HEARING Development Department at includes 1) altering the lay- sufficient number of signa. in lawful money of the said Notice of Default and BEFORE PLANNING 408 868 -1222 or review out of the driveway near the tures, is filed with the coun. United States) At the Election to sell to be COMMISSION the Site Visit Agenda on the front entrance to avoid con- ty superintendent of schools entrance to the Superior recorded in the County CITY OFSARATOGA'S City Website at www.sarato- flict with existing water within 30 days of the provi- Courthouse, 190 N. Market where the real property PLANNING COMMISSION ga.ca.us. meters, 2) proposed rear sional appointment, it shall St., San Jose, CA All right, is located. announces the following APPLICATION If yard landscaping to Include become an effective appoint- title and interest conveyed Date: 1/16/2008 public hearings on ADR07- 0022 (393 - 38.007) concrete patios, swimming ment. to and now held by it First American Wednesday, the 13th day of Bijan /Sangam,13574 Howen pool, and pond, 3) construc. (Pursuant to Education under said Deed of Trust Title Insurance Company - February 2008 at 1:00 P.M. Drive - The applicant tion of the cabana, and 4) Codes 5091 and 5092) in the property situated First American LoanStar in the City Council Chambers requests Design Review the removal of five trees For further information, in said County and Slate Trustee Services located at 13777 Fruitvale approval to demolish the (including three Oak trees) contact West Valley- Mission _ described as: As more fully 3 First American Way Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070. existing t g second floor of the to accommodate th e revised ed Community College District described in the above Santa Ana CA 927 o7 Details and plans are avail- approximately 3,217 square driveway location and the Office of the Chancellor mentioned Deed of Trust First American Loanstar able at the Saratoga foot residence and construct removal of one Eucalyptus 14000 Fruitvale Avenue APN# 386.26.040 Trustee Services may be Community Development a new second floor. The tree for the construction of Saratoga. CA 95070 The street address and other acting as a debt collector Department. Monday existing second floor is the cabana. The property is 408. 741.2011 common designation, if any, . attempting to collect a through Thursday, 7:30 a.m. approximately 457 square zoned R -1. 40,000. (Chris (Pub SN 1/30, 216) of the real property debt. - 5:00p.m. If you have ques. .feet and the proposed sec- Riordan) described above is purport- Any information obtained lions, Planners are available end floor is approximately APPLICATION If qrJ,./,, ed to be: 12161 Viewoak will be used for that Original document at ' the public counter 498 square feet. Changes to MODOB -0001 (510 -03 -012) v� rustee Drive, Saratoga, CA 95070 purpose. between the hours of 7:30 windows, siding, and a new Labio —15211 Bellecourt The under }igned Trustee signed by Authorized Agent a.m. and 12:00 noon. roof are also proposed. The Drive: The applicant Sales disclaims any liability for Chet Sconyers All interested persons may lot size is approximately requests a Modification to a any incorrectness of the For Trustee's appear and be heard at the 11,270 square feet, and the previously approved Design street address and other Sale Information above time and place. If you site is located in the R-1- Review application. The common designation, if any, Please Call challenge a decision of the 10,000 zoning district. modification is for a 110 TSG NO.: 3478070 shown herein. Said sale (714) 573 -1965 Planning Commission pur- Design Review approval is square foot addition to a TS NO.: 20079070803197 will be made, but without P352979 suant to a public hearing in required pursuant to 6,008 square foot house FHA/VA /PMI NO.: covenant or warranty, (Pub SN 1/16,1/23.1/30) Important Information: No refunds after submission. Canceled ads will receive credit for future advertising, not a refund. Ads mtusr be canceled before deadline for that issue. Advertisements are accepted upon the representation that the advertiser and /or its agency have die right to publish the contents thereof. In consid- eration of such publication, advertiser and its agency agree to indemnify and hold the publisher harmless against any expense or loss by reason of any claims arising out of publication. The publisher reserves the right to edit, alter, omit, or refuse any advertising submitted. For policies concerning specific categories, please refer to the paragraph at the beginning of the category or call us at 405.200.1025 or email us at classifieds @community- nevvspapers.com. Silicon Valley Community Newspapers accepts no liability for its failure, for any cause, to insert an advertisement. Liability forany error appearing in an adver- tisement is limited to the cost of the space . actually occupied. No allowance, how- ever, will be granted for an error that does not materially affect the value of the advertisement. To qualify for an adjustment, any error must be reported within 15 days of publication date. Credit for errors is limited to first insertion. • Attachment 1 5 • , l 06 1*6p 1 O o • ,_ r . ,r M �� 3 OL t Sri • � �� r � i 1 mimplo A kw- �9 #,,e IWW I i � c M �� 3 OL t Sri • � �� r � i 1 mimplo A kw- �9 #,,e IWW I i kp- )ili— %Ogsl ��s181_E H 1� F � 1 1 GREEN = Indo+ YELLOW =Mok RED = autdo�oi WHITE = NO C' 190 � ■ 7 - s Arta !R. it JVF ■ .1 �9 JAS 1 paol� w ' �i� pply`1 ° ' Z � I � r 190 � ■ 7 - s Arta !R. it JVF ■ .1 �9 JAS 1 paol� w ' �i� pply`1 ° ' Z � I !Opt ow S 9 n J y r ice- a proposed antenna qO r :4M.. 9 0 MetrOPCS- Westhope Church Site # SF19200C Looking Northwest from Parking Lot 12768 Saratoga Avenue 1/30108 Saratoga, CA 95070 ApplW imagination 510 914-0500 • • MetroPCS - Proposed Base Station (Site No. SF19200C) 12768 Saratoga Avenue - Saratoga, California Statement of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers The.firm of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers, has been retained on behalf of MetroPCS, a personal wireless telecommunications carrier, to evaluate the base station (Site No. SF19200C) proposed to be located at 12768 Saratoga Avenue in Saratoga, California, for compliance with appropriate guidelines limiting human exposure to radio frequency ( "RF ") electromagnetic fields. Prevailing Exposure Standards The U.S. Congress requires that the Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC ") evaluate its actions for possible significant impact on the environment. In Docket 93 -62, effective October 15, 1997, the FCC adopted the human exposure limits for field strength and power density recommended in Report No. 86, "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields," published in 1986 by the Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements ( "NCRP "). Separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions, with the latter limits generally five times more restrictive. The more recent Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ( "IEEE ") Standard C95.1 -2005, "Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz," includes similar exposure limits. A summary of the FCC's exposure limits is shown in Figure 1. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. The most restrictive FCC limit for exposures of unlimited duration to radio frequency energy for several personal wireless services are as follows: Personal Wireless Service Approx. Freyuena Occupational Limit Public Limit Personal Communication ( "PCS ") 1,950 MHz 5.00 mW /cm2 1.00 mW /cm2 Cellular Telephone 870 2.90 0.58 Specialized Mobile. Radio 855 2.85 0.57 [most restrictive frequency range] 30-300 1.00 0.20 General Facility Requirements Base stations typically consist of two distinct parts: the electronic transceivers (also called "radios" or "channels ") that are connected to the traditional wired telephone lines, and the passive antennas that send the wireless signals created by the radios out to be received by individual subscriber units. The transceivers are often located at ground level and are connected to the antennas by coaxial cables about 1 inch thick. Because of the short wavelength of the frequencies assigned by the FCC for wireless services, the antennas require line -of -sight paths for their signals to propagate well and so are installed at some height above ground: The antennas are designed to concentrate their energy toward OIL=R' HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. "- CONSULTING ENGINEERS f NM' SAN FRANCISCO MP19200596 Page 1 of 4 MetroPCS • Proposed Base Station (Site No. SF19200C) 12768 Saratoga Avenue • Saratoga, California • the horizon, with very little energy wasted toward the sky or the ground. Along with the low power of such facilities, this means that it is generally not possible for exposure conditions to approach the maximum permissible exposure limits without being physically very near the antennas. Computer Modeling Method The FCC provides direction for determining compliance in its Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC - Specified Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation," dated August 1997. Figure 2 attached describes the calculation methodologies, reflecting the facts that a directional antenna's radiation pattern is not fully formed at locations very close by (the "near- field" effect) and that at greater distances the power level from an energy source decreases with the square of the distance from it (the "inverse square law "). The conservative nature of this method for evaluating exposure conditions has been verified by numerous field tests. Site and Facility Description Based upon information provided by MetroPCS, including drawings by Michael Wilk Architecture, dated June 8, 2007, it is proposed to mount one Andrew Model 931DG70VTREM tri- sector PCS antenna inside a new cross structure to be installed above the roof of the Westhope Church, located at • 12768 Saratoga Avenue in Saratoga. The antenna would be mounted at an effective height of about 33 feet above ground, 121/2 feet above the roof. The maximum effective radiated power in any direction would be 1,890 watts, representing six channels operating simultaneously at 315 watts each. • i i Presently installed on a 50 -foot pole located some 200 feet away are similar antennas for use by T Mobile, another wireless telecommunications carrier. For the limited purposes of this study, it is assumed that T Mobile has installed Andrew Model RR65 -15 -02 directional PCS antennas at an effective height of about 50 feet above ground and operates with a maximum effective radiated power in any direction of 1,500 watts. Study Results For a person anywhere at ground, the maximum ambient RF exposure level due to the proposed Metro operation by itself is calculated to be 0.0065 mW /cm2, which is 0.65% of the applicable public exposure limit. The maximum calculated cumulative level at ground for the simultaneous operation of both carriers is 0.89% of the public limit; the maximum calculated cumulative level at the second - floor elevation of any nearby building would be 2.1% of the applicable public exposure limit. The maximum calculated cumulative level on the roof of the subject building is 18% of the public limit. It HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO MP19200596 Page 2 of 4 MetroPCS • Proposed Base Station (Site No. SF19200C) 12768 Saratoga Avenue • Saratoga, California should be noted that these results include several "worst- case" assumptions and therefore are expected to overstate actual power density levels. Recommended Mitigation Measures. Due to their mounting location, the Metro antennas would not be accessible to the general public, and so no mitigation measures ate necessary to comply with the FCC public exposure guidelines. To prevent occupational exposures in excess of the FCC guidelines, no access within 3 feet directly in front of the Metro antennas themselves, such as might occur during maintenance work on the cross structure, should be allowed while the base station is in operation, unless other measures can be demonstrated to ensure that occupational protection requirements are met. Posting explanatory warning signs' at the base of the cross, such that the signs would be readily visible from any angle of approach to persons who might need to work within that distance, would be sufficient to meet FCC - adopted guidelines. Conclusion Based on the information and analysis above, it is the undersigned's professional opinion that the base station proposed by MetroPCS at 12768 Saratoga Avenue in Saratoga, California, will comply with the prevailing standards for limiting public exposure to radio frequency energy and, therefore, will not for • this reason cause a significant impact on the environment. The highest calculated level in publicly accessible areas is much less than the prevailing standards allow for exposures of unlimited duration. This finding is consistent with measurements of actual exposure conditions taken at other operating base stations. Posting of explanatory signs is recommended to establish compliance with occupational exposure limitations. r im Warning signs should comply with OET -65 color, symbol, and content recommendations. Contact information should be provided (e.g., a telephone number) to arrange for access to restricted areas. The selection of language(s) is not an engineering matter, and guidance from the landlord, local zoning or health authority, or appropriate professionals may be required. HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO MP19200596 Page 3 of 4 C] • F� ffieiry. Y M i MetroPCS • Proposed Base Station (Site No. SF19200C) 12768 Saratoga Avenue • Saratoga, California Authorship The undersigned author of this statement is a qualified Professional Engineer, holding California Registration Nos. E -13026 and M- 20676, which expire on June 30, 2009. This work has been carried out by him or under his direction, and all statements are true and correct of his own knowledge except, where noted, when data has been supplied by others, which data he believes to be correct. July 9, 2007 HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO MP19200596 Page 4 of 4 FCC Radio Frequency Protection Guide The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Act) the Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC ") • . to adopt a nationwide human exposure standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a significant impact on the environment. The FCC adopted the limits from Report No. 86, "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields," published in 1986 by the Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, which are similar to the more recent Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Standard C95.1 -2005, "Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz." These limits apply for continuous exposures from all sources and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. As shown in the table and chart below, separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions, with the latter limits (in italics and/or dashed) up to five times more restrictive: Frequency Electromagnetic Fields (f is frequency of emission in MHz) Applicable Electric Magnetic Equivalent Far -Field Range Field Strength Field Strength Power Density (MHz) I (V /m) (A/m) (mW /cmZ) 0.3— 1.34 614 614 1.63 1.63 100 100 1.34— 3.0 614 823.81f 1.63 2.191f 100 18011 3.0— 30. 1842/f 823.81f 4.89/ f 2.191f 900/ f 18011 30— 300 61.4 27.5 0.163 0.0729 1.0 0.2 30071,500 3.54ff 1.5Nrf ff /106 ff1238 f/300 f /1500 1,500— 100,000 137 61.4 0.364 0.163 5.0 1.0 1000 /Occupational Exposure 100 f PCs 3 10 `� FM Cell 0 0.1 Public Exposure 0.1 1 10 100 103 104 105 Frequency (MHz) Higher levels are allowed for short periods of time, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or thirty minutes, for occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits, and higher levels also are allowed for exposures to small areas, such that the spatially averaged levels do not exceed the limits. However, neither of these allowances is incorporated in the conservative calculation formulas in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) for projecting field levels. Hammett & Edison has built those formulas into a proprietary program that calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density from any number of individual radio sources. The program allows for the description of buildings and uneven terrain, if required to obtain more accurate projections. S6-1 E94PO HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS FCC Guidelines SAN MANCISCO Figure 1 y • • i RFR.CALCTM Calculation Methodology Assessment by.Calculation of Compliance with FCC Exposure Guidelines The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Act) the Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC ") to adopt a nationwide human exposure standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a significant impact on the environment. The maximum permissible exposure limits adopted by the FCC (see Figure 1) apply for continuous exposures from all sources and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. Higher levels are allowed for short periods of time, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or thirty minutes, for occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits. Near Field. Prediction methods have been developed for the near field zone of panel (directional) and whip (omnidirectional) antennas, typical at wireless telecommunications base stations, as well as dish (aperture) antennas, typically used for microwave links. The antenna patterns are not . fully formed in the near field at these antennas, and the FCC .Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) gives suitable formulas for calculating power density within such zones. For a panel or whip antenna, power density S = 180 x 0.1 x Pnet B jr x DZ x h' in mW /cm2, sw and for an aperture antenna, maximum power density Smax = x h2 O.1x16xr,xPnet in mW /cm2, where eBW = half =power beamwidth of the antenna, in degrees, and Pnet = net power input to the antenna, in watts, D I = distance from antenna, in meters, h = aperture height of the antenna, in meters, and q = aperture efficiency (unitless, typically 0.5 -0.8). The factor of 0.1 in the numerators converts to the desired units of power density. Far Field. OET 65 gives this formula for calculating power density in the far field of an individual RF source: 2.56 x 1.64 x 100 x RFF 2 xERP power density S = in mW /cm2 4x,7r xD2 ' where ERP = total ERP (all polarizations), in kilowatts, RFF = relative field factor at the direction to the actual point of calculation, and D = distance from the center of radiation to the point of calculation, in meters. The factor of 2.56 accounts for the increase in power density due to ground reflection, assuming a reflection coefficient of 1.6 (1.6 x 1.6 = 2.56). The factor of 1.64 is the gain of a half -wave dipole relative to an isotropic radiator. The factor of 100 in the numerator converts to the desired units of power density. This formula has been built into a proprietary program that calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density from any number of individual radiation sources. The program also allows for the description of uneven terrain in the vicinity, to obtain more accurate projections. HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. #x CONSULTING ENGINEERS �� SAN FRANCISCO Methodology Figure 2 Attachment 6 • IT! • C • p CN. metro C DIRECTIONS FROM METRO PCS OFFICE AT 1080 MARINA VILLAGE PKWY, ALAMEDA, CA: 1. START AT 1080 MARINA VILLAGE PKWY, ALAMEDA GOING TOWARD INDEPENDENCE DR - GO 0.3 MI 2. TURN RIGHT ON MARINER SQUARE DR - GO 0.2 MI 3. CONTINUE ON WEBSTER ST - GO 0.2 MI 4. CONTINUE ON POSEY TUBE - GO 0.7 MI 5. CONTINUE ON HARRISON ST - GO 0.1 MI 6. TURN RIGHT ON 7TH ST - GO 0.1 MI 7. TURN RIGHT ON JACKSON ST - GO 0.1 MI 8. TURN LEFT ON 5TH ST - GO 0.1 MI 9. TAKE RAMP ONTO 1 -880 SOUTH TOWARD SAN JOSE - GO 41.3 MI 10. CONTINUE ON CA -17 SOUTH - GO 4.0 MI 11. TAKE THE CA -85 EXIT TOWARD MOUNTAIN VIEW - GO 3.3 MI 12. TAKE THE SARATOGA AVENUE EXIT - GO 0.3 MI 13. TURN RIGHT ON SARATOGA AVE - GO 0.4 MI 14. ARRIVE AT 12768 SARATOGA AVE, SARATOGA, ON THE .. RIGHT S F 1 9200C WESTHOPE CHURCH 12768 SARATOGA AVENUE SARATOGA, CA 95070 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA THE PROJECT INVOLVES THE INSTALLATION OF: -TRI- SECTOR ANTENNA CYLINDER MOUNTED ON NEW CROSS STRUCTURE TO REPLACE EXISTING. -(1) RADIO & (1) BATTERY CABINET MOUNTED IN RELOCATED STORAGE SHED. - ANTENNA COAXIAL TRANSMISSION LINES FROM BTS TO ANTENNAS. -POWER AND TELEPHONE SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED FROM EXISTING SOURCES. I PROJECT DESCRIPTION - I APPLICANTILESSEE METRO PCS INC. 1080 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY, 4TH FLOOR ALAMEDA, CA 94501 CONTACT: ROWENA OKIALDA PHONE: (510) 706 -8886 LEASING MANAGER ZONING MANAGER MATT DOOLING TOM SPAULDING (650) 520 -4349 (650)380 -3140 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER JAMES WEILAND METRO PCS INC. 1080 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY, 4TH FLOOR ALAMEDA, CA 94501 (510) 258 -699B PROPERTY INFORMATION LANDLORD: PRESBYTERY OF SAN JOSE ADDRESS: 12850 SARATOGA AVENUE SARATOGA. CA 95070 CONTACT: REVEREND SWANSON PHONE: 408 - 225 -5579 AREA OF CONSTRUCTION: 131.25 t SQ. FT. OCCUPANCY TYPE: U -1 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE V -N CURRENT ZONING: R -1 LAT: 37' 16' 54.19" N INAD 831 LONG: 122' 00' 03.02" W A.P.N.: 386-14-016 HANDICAP METRO PCS FACILITY IS UN- MANNED AND REQUIREMENTS: NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. DISABLED ACCESS NOT REQUIRED. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES. 1. 2001 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE 2. UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 3. BUILDING OFFICIALS AND CODE ADMINISTRATORS (BOCA) 4. UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE 5. ANSI /EIA -222 -F 6. LIFE SAFETY CODE NFPA -101 7. UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE 8. NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE 9. CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 10. CITY /COUNTY ORDINANCES 11. 1999 NFPA 72,LIFE SAFETY CODE 12. NFPA 13, SPRINKLER CODE 13. TITLE 24, ENERGY CODE CODE ARr`WITFr T MICHAEL WILK ARCHITECTURE 833 MARKET STREET, SUITE 803 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 CONTACT: JAMES VACCARO CONTACT NUMBER: (415) 350 -6346 FAX NUMBER: (415) 904 -8388 SURVEYOR PHIL AUER SURVEYING 14407 CORTE LEJOS BAKERSFIELD, CA 93314 CONTACT NUMBER: (661) 587 -6129 FAX NUMBER: (510) 714 -7224 I DRIVING DIRECTIONS I I PROJECT SUMMARY I I PROJECT TEAM I SHEET DESCRIPTION REV. T1 TITLE SHEET 4 T2 GENERAL NOTES 4 T3 ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS/ ANTENNA CONFIGURATION CHART 4 LSl SURVEY 4 Al OVERALL SITE PLAN 4 A2 ENLARGED PROJECT AREA PLAN 4 A3 EQUIPMENT/ LEASE AREA PLAN. ANTENNA DETAIL, CABINET DETAILS 4 A4 ELEVATIONS 4 A5 ELEVATIONS 4 SHEETINDEX TITLE SIGNATURE DATE LEASING ZONING CONSTRUCTION LANDLORD RF ENGINEER SIGNATURE BLOCK DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS THESE DRAWINGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL -SIZE AT 24 "X36 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT /ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR MATERIAL ORDERS OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO PREVENT STORM WATER POLLUTION DURING CONSTRUCTION. GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES Michael Wilk Architecture 833 Market Street, Suite 803 San Francisco, CA 94103 tel: 415.839.9594 fax: 415.904.8388 PROJECT N0. SF19200C DRAWN BY JV CHECKED BY MICHAEL WILK 1 05/25/07 90% ZONING 2 06/08/07 Y o � g g$� 100% ZONING REV �QQLLQ Z $ � N W cr) a aW J ^ Q O f �u- V J 00 PROJECT N0. SF19200C DRAWN BY JV CHECKED BY MICHAEL WILK 1 05/25/07 90% ZONING 2 06/08/07 QLO U 2 Q °' 100% ZONING REV 4 N W cr) a �U Q O < 0 �u- V J 00 ,�^^ U) � Q W 04 cn 7 PROJECT N0. SF19200C DRAWN BY JV CHECKED BY MICHAEL WILK 1 TITLE SHEET T -1 EXHI:Ii,� 05/25/07 90% ZONING 2 06/08/07 100% ZONING 3 06/21/07 100% ZONING REV 4 09/28/07 100% ZONING REV TITLE SHEET T -1 EXHI:Ii,� m m • • Ll SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD, WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND THAT THEY HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED AND SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THEIR DESIGN AND SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. ❑ SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION ❑ CONCRETE OVER 2500 PSI AT 28 DAYS ❑ CONCRETE PLACEMENT AT SLAB ON GRADE ❑ WRITTEN CERTIFICATION FOR PROPER PLACEMENT OF REINFORCEMENTS AT SLAB ON GRADE ❑ FOUNDATION EXCAVATION AND FILL INCLUDING UTILITY TRENCHES ❑ CERTIFICATION OF BUILDING PAD, FOUNDATION AND FILL BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OF THE RECORD ❑ VERIFICATIONS OF MILL REPORT ❑ IDENTIFICATION OF STEEL AND AT JOB SITE ❑ ADHESIVE BOLTS IN CONCRETE OR MASONRY ❑ ANCHOR BOLTS INSTALLATION AND PLACEMENT IN CONCRETE ❑ HIGH STRENGTH BOLTING ❑ EXPANSION ANCHOR INSTALLATION ❑ SPRAYED -ON- FIREPROOFING ❑ STRUCTURAL MASONRY ❑ PRESTRESSED CONCRETE ❑ ALL FIELD WELDING ❑ REINFORCING PLACEMENT ❑ DESIGNER SPECIFIED (SEE SHEET # -_) ❑ OTHER- SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS 1 6 1 SEE SHEET T -3 FOR ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK, SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES, AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR DRILLING PIERS AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW. THIS WILL INCLUDE BUT N01 BE LIMITED TO A) FALL PROTECTION B) CONFINED SPACE C) ELECTRICAL SAFETY D) TRENCHING & EXCAVATION. 3. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 4. IF NECESSARY, RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBRIS, STICKS, STONES AND OTHER REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVE FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. 5. ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES, WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE REMOVED AND /OR CAPPED, PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF CONTRACTOR, OWNER AND /OR LOCAL UTILITIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SITE SIGNAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIO1 FOR SITE SIGNAGE. B. THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY FROM THE BTS EQUIPMENT AND TOWER AREAS. 9. NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR EMBANKMENT. 10. THE SUB GRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION. 11. THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED BY THE TOWER, EQUIPMENT OR DRIVEWAY, SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE, AND STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION AS SPECIFIED IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. IF REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. I SITE WORK GENERAL NOTES 1 3 1 1 ANTENNA CONFIGURATION CHART 1 71 MANUFACTURER: MARATHON MODEL NO.: M12V105FT TYPF- iTATIONARY CFAI FI1 I FA11-Arin RATTFRY TYPE PER UNIT # OF BATTERIES TOTAL VOLUME WEIGHT VOLUME WEIGHT GRID REFERENCE LITER GALLON K. LBS LITER GALLON KG LEIS TOTAL ELECTROLYTE WOOD CONTINUOUS 1.4 7.0 15.5 10 53 14 70 155 SULFURIC ACID k�h 0.43 STEEL 4- 10 16 4.3 30 66 BATTERY WEIGHT N/A 35.8 79 10 _N/A N/A 358 790 BATTERY CHART O GROUT OR PLASTER -2001 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC), PART 5, TITLE 24 C.C.R. SPOT ELEVATION CONCRETE 0 REVISION EARTH O GRID REFERENCE PLYWOOD REBAR SHALL BE CUT WITHOUT PRIOR CONTRACTOR APPROVAL WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN CONCRETE. $ a SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, REQUIRED BY GOVERNING CODES, SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ORDER TO e DETAIL REFERENCE GRAVEL STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES 151 WOOD CONTINUOUS F- Q w 04 cn ELEVATION REFERENCE (� WOOD BLOCKING STEEL 4- SECTION REFERENCE SYMBOLS 1. ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACI 301, ACI 318, ACI 336, ASTM A184, ASTM A185 AND THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE. 2. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 2500 PSI AT 28 DAYS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615. GRADE 60, DEFORMED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 1B5 WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPLICES SHALL BE CLASS "B" AND ALL HOOKS SHALL BE STANDARD. UNO. 4. THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR REINFORCING STEEL UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS: CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH ........3 IN. CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER: 6 AND LARGER .......................... 2 IN. 5 AND SMALLER & WWF1 1/2 IN. CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER OR NOT CAST AGAINST THE GROUND: SLAB AND WALL ........................3/4 IN. BEAMS AND COLUMNS ............... 1 1/2 IN. 5. A CHAMFER 3/4" SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE, LINO, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301 SECTION 4.2.4. 6. INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPANSION /WEDGE ANCHOR, SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE. THE ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD SHALL CONFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. NO REBAR SHALL BE CUT WITHOUT PRIOR ENGINEERING APPROVAL WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN CONCRETE. EXPANSION BOLTS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY HILT[INC. AND SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL HILTI KWIK BOLT III OR APPROVED EQUAL, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN PLANS. CONCRETE AND REINFORCING STEEL NOTES 141 1. ALL STEEL WORK SHALL BE PAINTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A36 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL WELDING SHALL BE PERFORMED USING E70XX ELECTRODES AND WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO RISC. WHERE FILLET WELD SIZES ARE NOT SHOWN, PROVIDE THE MINIMUM SIZE PER TABLE J2.4 IN THE AISC "MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION ". PAINTED SURFACES SHALL BE TOUCHED UP. 3. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE ASTM A325 BEARING TYPE (3/4 "0) CONNECTIONS AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 1. FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWING. THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS SHALL APPLY: CONTRACTOR - GENERAL CONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR - SUBCONTRACTOR OWNER - CARRIER OEM - ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER 2. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, THE BIDDING CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT, THE CELL SITE TO FAMILIARIZE WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TO CONFIRM THAT THE WORK CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. ANY DISCREPANCY FOUND SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF ARCHITECT /ENGINEER. 3. ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED AND INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ISSUE ALL APPROPRIATE NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS, AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. 4. ALL WORK CARRIED OUT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES. ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE CODE AND REGULATIONS. 5. DRAWINGS PROVIDED HERE ARE NOT TO BE SCALED AND ARE INTENDED TO SHOW OUTLINE ONLY 6. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES, AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE. B. IF THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT CANNOT BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE ARCHITECT /ENGINEER. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ACTUAL ROUTING OF CONDUIT, POWER AND TI CABLES, GROUNDINi CABLES AS SHOWN ON THE POWER, GROUNDING AND TELCO PLAN DRAWING. CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE EXISTING TRAYS AND /OR SHALL ADD NEW TRAYS AS NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THE ACTUAL ROUTING WITH THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, PAVEMENTS, CURBS, LANDSCAPING AN[ STRUCTURES. ANY DAMAGED PART SHALL BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF OWNER. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL LEGALLY AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL SCRAP MATERIALS SUCH AS COAXIAL CABLES AND OTHER ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE EXISTING FACILITY. ANTENNAS REMOVED SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE OWNER'S DESIGNATED LOCATION. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION. 13. ALL CONCRETE REPAIR WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE (ACI) 301. 14. ANY NEW CONCRETE NEEDED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION SHALL HAVE 2500 PSI STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS. ALL CONCRETING WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318 CODE REQUIREMENTS 15. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AISC SPECIFICATIONS. 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK. ALL DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS MUST BE VERIFIED CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIAL OR PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 17. THE EXISTING CELL SITE IS IN FULL COMMERCIAL OPERATION. ANY CONSTRUCTION WORK BY CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISRUPT THE EXISTING NORMAL OPERATION. ANY WORK ON EXISTING EQUIPMENT MUST BE COORDINATED WITH CONTRACTOR. ALSO, WORK SHOULD BE SCHEDULED FOR AN APPROPRIATE MAINTENANCE WINDOW USUALLY IN LOW TRAFFIC PERIODS AFTER MIDNIGHT. 18. SINCE THE CELL SITE IS ACTIVE, ALL SAFETY PRECAUTIONS MUST BE TAKEN WHEN WORKING AROUND HIGH LEVELS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION. EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE SHUTDOWN PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY WORK THAT COULD EXPOSE THE WORKERS TO DANGER. PERSONAL RF EXPOSURE MONITORS ARE ADVISED TO BE WORN TO ALERT OF ANY DANGEROUS EXPOSURE LEVELS. 19. PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2 -A OR 2- A /10 -BC WITHIN 75 FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO PREVENT STORM WATER POLLUTION DURING CONSTRUCTION. GENERALNOTES ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES. -2001 BUILDING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PART 1, TITLE 24 C.C.R. -2001 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE(CBC), PART 2, TITLE 24, C.C.R. (1997) UNIFORM BUILDING CODE VOLUMES 1 -3 AND -2001 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) -2004 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC), PART 3, TITLE 24 C.C.R. (2005 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND 2001 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) -2001 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC), PART 4, TITLE 24 C.C.R. (2000 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE AND 2001 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 4. NON- STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS FOR STEEL GRATING MAY USE 5 /8" DIA. ASTM A 307 BOLTS -2001 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC), PART 5, TITLE 24 C.C.R. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. _ (2003 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE AND 2001 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 5. INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPANSION /WEDGE ANCHOR, SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN -2001 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, PART 9, TITLE 24 C.C.R. RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE. THE ANCHOR BOLT. DOWEL OR ROD SHALL CONFORM TO (2000 UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND 2001 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. NO _2001 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS, PART 12. TITLE 24 C.C.R. REBAR SHALL BE CUT WITHOUT PRIOR CONTRACTOR APPROVAL WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN CONCRETE. $ a SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, REQUIRED BY GOVERNING CODES, SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ORDER TO -TITLE 19 C.C.R., PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE FIRE MARSHALL REGULATIONS MAINTAIN MANUFACTURER'S MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOADS. o STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES 151 APPLICABLE CODES Michael Wilk Architecture 833 Market Street, Suite 803 San Francisco, CA 94103 tel: 415.839.9594 fax: 415.904.8388 1 ate; 4+ W. O w � O 86 oU ¢ OU N W $ a Q O o 2 W. O Q U*) M oU ¢ OU N W Q O o �L v J cc) CO CO F- Q w 04 cn PROJECT NO. SF19200C DRAWN BY N CHECKED BY �MICHAEL MLK 1 3106/21/071100% ZONING REVI SHEET TITLE GENERAL NOTES SHEET NUMBER T =2 1 artsfdJ Wawa 4.�n�dn yeHirvuwyr .IW ixv dAtthNVms -:::`. ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS 05/25/071 ULL � O ANTENNA SECTOR # OF ANTENNAS AZIMUTH RAD CENTER ANTENNA MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL REr RET CABLE MAIN CABLE CABLE TOP JUMPER BOTTOM JUMPER CABLE # AND PORT# COLOR CODE COMMENTS ANTENNA MAIN CABLE CABLE iAND MAKEIMODEL TILT TILT LENGTH LENGTH SIZE LENGTH LENGTH MAKEIMODEL CABLE SIZE PORT# COMMENTS LENGTH ALPHA 1 O 136' -3j" A.G.L. ANDREW 931 DG70VTREM 0 T.B.D. BY RF DIRECT ±30' ±35' 1/2 "0 t0' t6' TX /RX 1/1 RX - 2/2 RED WHITE/ RED GPS LUCENT ±18' 1/2 "0 RX: PORT 7 ENGINEER BETA 1 120' t36' -3j' A.G.L. ANDREW 931DG7OVTREM 0 T.B.D. By RF DIRECT ±30' ±35' 1/2 "0 t0' t6' TX /RX 1/3 RX - 2/4 BLUE WHITE/ BLUE ENGINEER GAMMA 1 240' t36' -3.3" A.G.L. ANDREW 931DG70VTREM 0 T.B.D. BY RF DIRECT ±30' ±35' 1/2 "0 t0' t6' TX /RX 1/5 RX - 2/6 GREEN WHITE/ GREEN ENGINEER NOTE: THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO ORDERING ANY EQUIPMENT. ANTENNA CONFIGURATION CHART Michael Wilk Archttecture 833 Market Street, Suite 803 San Francisco, CA 94103 tel: 415.839.9594 fax: 415.904.8388 inn. 05/25/071 ULL � O 06 08 07 Y 2 W gga C5 U �ag N W Q L O �o U) _ H DO 2 05/25/071 ULL � O 06 08 07 Q50:1 2 Q rn C5 U 0 O U N W Q L O �o U) _ H DO U) ti W ,Q ^ 04 V/ PROJECT N0. SF19200C DRAWN BY JV CHECKED BY MICHAEL MLK 1 SHEET ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS T -3 05/25/071 907 ZONING 2 06 08 07 100% ZONING 3 06 21 07 100% ZONING REV 4 09 28 07100% ZONING REV SHEET ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS T -3 — OVERALL SITE MAP SCAM: 1•_�• LEGEND — EDGE OF PAVEMENT / 145, MANHOLE FIRE HYDRANT E E Ir 14T / . "/ / \ OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE LIGHT POLE O MONUMENT -X X X— 'I. A.P.N. BK. 386. PG. 59 4 FENCE LINE- .� Q HANDICAPPED - \� TREE PARKING % .\ �• PROPERTY LINE P./ •j, JET •� TELEPHONE E ANSL ....... ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL J AGL .......... ABOVE GROUND LEVEL III �O/ •PP POLE Q -V4.3' ELEVATION C CP F•••••FIELD CONTROL POINT A •F DATE OF SURVEY: 05/16/07 GRAPHIC SCALE 1'� 10' / GRAPHIC SCALE 1•- 50' SURVEYED BY/ OR UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: LIS S075P Auer / S�e2F NOTES: Expires 06 /30/07 0 10 20 30 , C€N7ERLINE \� 0 50 100 150 COMPLETE PREUMINARI' REPORT (WITH ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION WAS NOT OF 10 MADE PApflC AVAILABLE AT TIME OF FIELD SURVEY. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY'. THIS IS A /PACBELL TELEPHONE d: TELEGRAPH CO. ,\ SPECIALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY MAP WITH PROPERTY LINES AND EASEMENTS I CONTOUR INTERVAL 1' AULT r EASEMENT CP 40 DRIVEWAY �1 TRANSFORMER (PER PER 117 R.S. 25 BEING A GRAPHIC DEPICTION PROP PROPERTY OF VARIOUS R INFORMATION GATHERED FROM PRELIMINARY ( ) \ A.P.N. BK. 386. PG. 58 MALE REPORTS OR PROPERTY HISTORY REPORTS, BApt -UP DOCUMENTS OF RECORD, MAPS AND AVAILABLE MONUMENTS FOUND DURING THE UNDERGROUND SURVEY. NU PROPERTY -=;.7— -- _ __ _- __ _— —_ — — — ,,\ LOCATING S WERE SET. UNLESS CONTACTED OTHERWISE NOTED, NO UNDERGROUND UAIUTY _ THEREFOR SERNCE COMPANY WAS ISSLE R PRIOR TO THIS NAP BEING PREPARED: _ PROPERTY THERE MAY BE HIS MAP. OR OBSCURE UTILITIES EXISTING ON THE — — -- — — —� __ PROPERTY NOT SHOWN ON THIS YAP. P.G. A E. VAULT \. COMPLETE PRELIMINARY REPORT RECEIVED XX/XX/)OL .� aelrNNr A.P.N. 386 -14 -016 / SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: p �_ :` PARCEL A ((PORTION) \� IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. CITY OF SARATOGA. 0. ' (PER 117 R.S. 25) • \, /e DESCRIBED AS FO LOWS: PARCEL •A•, PER RECORD OF SURVEY FILED MARCH 1, 1960. IN BOOK 111 OF \MAPS, PACE 25, SANTA CLARE COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITH SARATOGA AVENUE C ,�\ % AS IT EXISTS TODAY. `•\ .. `z, SEE LEASE AREA DESCRIPTION (PARCEL 1): 10 '` `,v ` SITE MAP' %, COMMENCING AT THE NOS! SOUTHERLY CORNER OF ABOVE SAID PARCEL •A- /110 ,\ `� ` •', .� THENCE NORTH ;719'59• WEST 209.07 FEET TO THE POINT QF BEGINNING: THENCE �, NORTH 4936'36 WEST 10.00 FEET THENCE NORTH 400V24 EAST 12.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 49'56'36• EAST 10.00 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 40'03'24 VEST 12.00 \`\ I FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. I CONTAINING 120 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS. ry TOGETHER WITH AN ACCESS ROUTE FROM THE LEASE AREA TO THE PUBLIC ROAD. A %\ - -� LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED AT A LATER DALE. PC CHURCH BUILDING \`� LIGHT \ttwo4Ftc r �i �•� r` TOGETHER WITH UTNTY AND POWER ROUTES NECESSARY TO SERVE THE LEASE EL.303.2' AMA �Af \` AREA. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED AT A LATER DATE '- >,p� \ *'p$s' y�•'� %• �6 BASIS OF ELEVATIONS NOVO 29 DATUM. J ` �•4/j� DOOR—,,, "1! \�J]7, O % BASIS OF BEARINGS CALIFORNIA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM. ZONE 3, MAD 83. PROSS rls E TOP L-321.6 µ , RAMP .\ �C>� \'���p�';.,4 �• �• PROJECT BENCH: AS INDICATED HEREON. TOP OF G7 —3 0.6' AMA cvaia'E DOUBLE \\ f��p \, / , Q , PRESBYTERY OF SAN JOSE O \ LATITUDE .A , ' ' `� DOORS `tiI `T O/\ �' P 12850 SARATOGA AVE. x 2ssa nil `Sq`��.`. &AKENGITU E �\` '% '' 'e \ �j (q SARATOGA CA 95070 .1 8 1 Ny,QP N A.P.N. 386 -14-016 a\ 2019x `T S i. ` ``I ,yX �i'r FINE2 \ j j al V MOST SWTHERLY NET AREA OR \\ J CORNER OF PARCEL A ry 1l0 (PER 117 R.S. 25) UNDERLYING PARCEL(Sk 3.743 AG LEASE AREA: 1201 S0. FT. O z •� 5 Y. `\ , `\ FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION OF LEASE AREA IN ZONE X AN AREA OF 500 -YEAR 28a0 ze10 `,yO ?� T \ •�--��• FLOOD. AS SHOWN ON FEMA FIRM MAP COMMUNITY -PANEL NUMBER 0603510002E O�` ` 0 1, \l 'l DATED JULY 3, 1997. 2313x + -0 ,• 11 FAA 1A CERTIFICA71ON: MAX 2e14 `1 2s20x LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE WAS OBTAINED FROM INFORMATION PROVIDED BY A CPS �, 4i AC` SURVEY. THE GEODETIC POSITION SHOWN WAS DETERMINED UTILIZING FAST -STATIC Ac PAM2rtA•r \ O eGi'iO '"q k0' l GPS OBSERVATIONS FROM USGS MONUMENTS USING TRIMBLE 460OLS �a ��4g4"la 4%� ,` •1� PROPOSED RECEIVERS. AR DATA WAS DIFFERENTIALLY CORRECTED WITH TRIMBLE GPS e:�'� z 10'X72' ♦ Qt,� ,�';' s'PeE\ METRO PCS 15* FEET HA"OOwiG°NFIQA�iL°rEArpo O7F1�E EL0.EVAn0lisslowlT ONCiS PLAN ARE mie x' 1 ` LEASE AREA ACCURATE TO WITHIN 33 FEET VERTICALLY. x PAR 1 4 g (PARCEL ) ELEVATION OF GROUND AT GPS POINT: 284.1' AMSL �\ 0 .2� ,! ` YY Ac PAN7dr STRUCTURE HEIGHT: TOP OF (E) CROSS/EL-321.8' AMSL/HT -37.5' AGL �`\ a�a Y4• AdC 1`l PROJECT BENCH LATITUDE: 3716'54.40• LATITUDE: 3716'54.19• NAIL & SHINER 2512% LONGITUDE: 121'59'59.17• (MAD 27) LONGITUDE: 12200'03.02• (MAD 83) xaxl ELa282.9' AMSL ``` � THE MAP WAS PREPARED FOR METRO PCS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FILING A PERMIT 0203.1 x . jj CP 403 MYTH THE dtt OF SARATOGA \ 2e30 \`l 263,111 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE \� X A.P.N. 386 -14 -016 • \Htg`rS PARCEL A PORTION) a a' SHED 2026X ( 117 R.S. ) �AFPq�i39 •�,,, _ SA RATOGA _. PROJECT \\—DOUeLE LOCATION 1A' . \o 2623% COX AVE. AI i e�Ay g (� rerq\, , ?` AC PAKYdr N vp �\ max d �' F� Jprys! \O �, \` o 2e27x SITE MAP OcALE: 1• -l0• 2 MetmPCS 1060 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY 4TH FLOOR ALAMEDA, CA 94501 (510) 523 -2610 r.PROJECT INFORMATION: WESTHOPE PRESS. CHURCH SF19200C 12768 SARATOGA AVE. SARATOGA, CA 95070 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CURRENT ISSUE DATE: 05/29/07 SSUED FOR: PERMIT EV.:=:DATE:=====DESCRIPTION: BY: Q 5/29/07 ISSUED FOR DRAFT 01 TCN LANS PREPARED BY: Phil Auer Surveying 2218 Hlaek Crcek St., Bakersfield, CA 93312 Phoae: (881 587 -8129 Mobile: 51 )) 714 -7224 E -ma0: Is5 75`eerthlink.mt ONSULTANT: r -DRAWN BY: CHK.� APV.: LTCN OPA I OPA UCENSURE PREPARED BY OR UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: giver Phi'y Auer L.S. 5075 (Expires 08/30/07) HEEf TITLE: c',p�/�� SUR HEET NUMBER: REVISION: LS1 A- I irS:z Q j tE).1ANDSCAPING. - p� � i� v / bt PROPOSED METRO PCS TELCO CONDUIT ROUTE VIA TRENCH -HAND DIG AS REQUIRED ' Ope \Rry . \ (E) SBC/ AT &T VAULT / z r . /� _ `. ,. ,♦ \. PROPOSED METRO PCS/ TELCO P.O.C. (E) PG &E TRANSFORMER (E) PG &E VAULT/ - PROPOSED METRO PCS POWER P.O.C. PROPOSED METRO PCS - BORE PIT LOCATION PROPOSED METRO PCS POWER/ TELCO ROUTE VIA DIRECTIONAL BORE WITHIN PROPOSED 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT (E) LANDSCAPING / ogic / ' as ro , 04 3 RR Michael Wilk Architecture 833 Market Street, Suite 803 San Francisco, CA 94103 tel: 415.839.9594 fax: 415.904.8388 p\ z ■ �� ........... . _... j b l ` PROJECT N SF tu. ■}, // // / A. P . N . 386-14 -011 %,:.* r - ........ -_ DRAWN BY D X19 �. \ '•_t %.. -;.YM1 r y. • ._..- ......../ MICHAEL MILK xj.... / (E) TREE. TYP. ♦ � �_•.� _....- ..---` -- -- _.-"....__/ �. t � CHECKED BY t / - ... r- ...__....... - o / ...... ._........ . PROPOSED METRO 1 `..........,.__. 1, 1 X '':. ... ...... . ... PCS PROJECT AREA n-2 T.......... _......... '.., / .. / ......... ...... ./ / A. P. N. 386 - 14-016 • ,,, / /...... __ .......... / / Ind A . P . N . 386 - 14-012 OVERALL SITE PLAN o 1 105/25/071 907 ZONING 2 106/08/071 YOO O W N u $ gg� 100% ZONING REV 4 09/28/07 100% ZONING REV p\ z ■ �� ........... . _... j b l ` PROJECT N SF tu. ■}, // // / A. P . N . 386-14 -011 %,:.* r - ........ -_ DRAWN BY D X19 �. \ '•_t %.. -;.YM1 r y. • ._..- ......../ MICHAEL MILK xj.... / (E) TREE. TYP. ♦ � �_•.� _....- ..---` -- -- _.-"....__/ �. t � CHECKED BY t / - ... r- ...__....... - o / ...... ._........ . PROPOSED METRO 1 `..........,.__. 1, 1 X '':. ... ...... . ... PCS PROJECT AREA n-2 T.......... _......... '.., / .. / ......... ...... ./ / A. P. N. 386 - 14-016 • ,,, / /...... __ .......... / / Ind A . P . N . 386 - 14-012 OVERALL SITE PLAN o 1 105/25/071 907 ZONING 2 106/08/071 100% ZONING 3 106/21/07 100% ZONING REV 4 09/28/07 100% ZONING REV OVERALL SITE PLAN A -1 • I; ,i • i i i PROPOSED METRO PCS �\ "` "''* "''''•,`;:' .`.y.`.,`./ TRISECTOR ANTENNA / 1 \ - ' ' ^` CYUNDER LOCATION AT + <",'%s'-:"� NEW CROSS STRUCTURE TO REPLACE EXISTING `,' %.yam , _ /9 JJ� �/ �''�`^• PROPOSED METRO PCs EQUIPMENT/ LEASE /�y 4//// �' ' : \'':l K -3 AREA AT (E) RELOCATED �4 >' ■ > / //� // d/ If 1 STORAGE SHED t \ l i "� 1� y 3' / :✓ ,. ::A \ \.\`., , � :,. •.\ \ \'., \ \ `'•�i. -"' � ✓, _spy,' ez- - . _ ......._.-_.. V ;� - •�i �? � ` \�`�`; s:'.��, ". � �` -r� < (E) TREE z <r +n ........... . ...........`_.....- `_--- --.._ -_ . , s : \. PROPOSED METRO PCS is , 7 x v f .�_ "��..._..,- >... LOCATION A WALL ....._---------- .......... ....... .._.. 100AMP POWER'•;METER LDG. • / • \'':. o < .' \ PROPO11D METRO PCS /^ " i /` + `•� ` ` ` POWER/ 7ELCO CONDUIT ROUTE IN\JOINT / ,. :'� ,spa•• :''�!� ..�:,�\ / WITHIN PREIPOSEDR5' WIDE ..... _..- -... -. UTILITY ENT ................._-"-_..._ ...........__._............._-_ `__- ... ... _....... , i \ •:.a r *• / PROPOSED METRO PCS DIRE EE/ NAL O BORE O WITHIN / , `....- / / /� / � --.. .. > is ` ........... - PROPOSED 5' WIDE UTILITY �`'-';. } `; , / � /�. //' i ,> EASEMENT �� -'---°--__._ .1.._........._....._...... -_.. PROPOSED METRO PCS BORE PIT LOCATION / y/ ��i/i /i� �..' (E) STORAGE SHED / / /,/ TO BE RELOCATED ..... .... ......_._- ............ _.. .. .......... ENLARGED PROJECT AREA PLAN Michael Wilk Architecture 833 Market Street, Suite 803 San Francisco, CA 94103 tel: 415.839.9594 fax: 415.904.8388 PROJECT NO. SF1920DC DRAWN BY JY CHECKED BY MICHAEL WILK 1 05/25/07 Li. W O 06/08/07 a � o w � 5� 100% ZONING REV >$a N W^ I - Q LL. O < 0 vJ = II- 0 PROJECT NO. SF1920DC DRAWN BY JY CHECKED BY MICHAEL WILK 1 05/25/07 Li. W O 06/08/07 100% ZONING U= Q° 100% ZONING REV Q Q 0 U N W^ I - Q LL. O < 0 vJ = II- 0 W N cn PROJECT NO. SF1920DC DRAWN BY JY CHECKED BY MICHAEL WILK 1 ITLE ENLARGED PROJECT AREA PLAN IUMBER A=2_ 05/25/07 907 ZONING 2 06/08/07 100% ZONING 3 06/21/07 100% ZONING REV 4 09/28/07 100% ZONING REV ITLE ENLARGED PROJECT AREA PLAN IUMBER A=2_ • 1 i I I I i U 6}4" DW. 't "`_.... o z z Michael Wilk ArcHtecture i w w E5 • Z n a rye / �UZUZ O 0 < o �0,<U � I z a tel: 415.839.9594 � Q ;>~^- n II PROPOSED METRO PCS TRI- SECTOR ANTENNA CYLINDE PROPOSED ACCES BASE CANISTER PROPOSED 6' DIP GALV. PIPE ARMS PROPOSED 6' DIP GALV. PIPE TS BASE BASE PROPOSED CROSS EXISTING CROSS CONCEALMENT CROSS DETAIL ;`"� 2 ISOMETRIC LUCENT 4.0 MOD CELL RADIO CABINET CABINET DETAILS ISOMETRIC EZBFO BATTERY CABINET �4 PROPOSED METRO PCS COAX ROUTE. ROUTE IN CEILING SPACE PROPOSED METRO PCS - COAX TO PENETRATE (E) SOFFIT AND ROUTE UP (E) WALL VIA VERTICAL CABLE TRAY. PAINT TO MATCH PROPOSED METRO PCS TRISECTOR ANTENNA 2 CYLI NDER MOUNTED ON NEW 3 CROSS STRUCTURE AT ROOF TO REPLACE EXISTING. I�. F / K : YRI r ` , r ;141 Jq E f Iz GPS > e. "(ABOVE). , _ - .- - PAINT TO ----- °- MATCH j PROPOSED ROOFTOP ENTRY : q ENCLOSURE GOQ G FOR COAX®, y40,�0 -, :... :.. j s•" w[ Py.- . O; 40' j 10 / /- - -'-'- 6`j j ! RELOCATED (E) STORAGE SHED " / i> I METRO PCS EQUIPMENT I LEASE AREA (EXTERIOR COLOR -GREY W1 j �j' Fri / WHITE TRIM) QOj/ r^`�/ ✓ r< ®:jar �SFq (E) A/C PARKING P PROPOSED PIPE PROPOS<ED METRO O : CS '('OWER TELCO `� BOLLARD. TYP. OF (3) _ TOTAL /P ROUTE IN 41 j `\`"`' ```y JOINT TRENCH WITHIN ` /, '- -��� �� PROPOSED 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT 3 EQUIPMENT/ LEASE AREA PLAN SCALE: 't "`_.... o j O Michael Wilk ArcHtecture i w I�. F / K : YRI r ` , r ;141 Jq E f Iz GPS > e. "(ABOVE). , _ - .- - PAINT TO ----- °- MATCH j PROPOSED ROOFTOP ENTRY : q ENCLOSURE GOQ G FOR COAX®, y40,�0 -, :... :.. j s•" w[ Py.- . O; 40' j 10 / /- - -'-'- 6`j j ! RELOCATED (E) STORAGE SHED " / i> I METRO PCS EQUIPMENT I LEASE AREA (EXTERIOR COLOR -GREY W1 j �j' Fri / WHITE TRIM) QOj/ r^`�/ ✓ r< ®:jar �SFq (E) A/C PARKING P PROPOSED PIPE PROPOS<ED METRO O : CS '('OWER TELCO `� BOLLARD. TYP. OF (3) _ TOTAL /P ROUTE IN 41 j `\`"`' ```y JOINT TRENCH WITHIN ` /, '- -��� �� PROPOSED 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT 3 EQUIPMENT/ LEASE AREA PLAN SCALE: 05/25/071 90% ZONING j O Michael Wilk ArcHtecture i w O �C7 g86 rye / Mark S 8 833 et Street, Suite 03 San Francisco, CA 94103 �ag 0 < o I�. F / K : YRI r ` , r ;141 Jq E f Iz GPS > e. "(ABOVE). , _ - .- - PAINT TO ----- °- MATCH j PROPOSED ROOFTOP ENTRY : q ENCLOSURE GOQ G FOR COAX®, y40,�0 -, :... :.. j s•" w[ Py.- . O; 40' j 10 / /- - -'-'- 6`j j ! RELOCATED (E) STORAGE SHED " / i> I METRO PCS EQUIPMENT I LEASE AREA (EXTERIOR COLOR -GREY W1 j �j' Fri / WHITE TRIM) QOj/ r^`�/ ✓ r< ®:jar �SFq (E) A/C PARKING P PROPOSED PIPE PROPOS<ED METRO O : CS '('OWER TELCO `� BOLLARD. TYP. OF (3) _ TOTAL /P ROUTE IN 41 j `\`"`' ```y JOINT TRENCH WITHIN ` /, '- -��� �� PROPOSED 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT 3 EQUIPMENT/ LEASE AREA PLAN SCALE: 05/25/071 90% ZONING j O Michael Wilk ArcHtecture i w O �C7 g86 °oU .. ... ' ^;� Mark S 8 833 et Street, Suite 03 San Francisco, CA 94103 �ag 0 < o E _i �`l I' / ' tel: 415.839.9594 � Q ;>~^- fax: 415.904.8388 I�. F / K : YRI r ` , r ;141 Jq E f Iz GPS > e. "(ABOVE). , _ - .- - PAINT TO ----- °- MATCH j PROPOSED ROOFTOP ENTRY : q ENCLOSURE GOQ G FOR COAX®, y40,�0 -, :... :.. j s•" w[ Py.- . O; 40' j 10 / /- - -'-'- 6`j j ! RELOCATED (E) STORAGE SHED " / i> I METRO PCS EQUIPMENT I LEASE AREA (EXTERIOR COLOR -GREY W1 j �j' Fri / WHITE TRIM) QOj/ r^`�/ ✓ r< ®:jar �SFq (E) A/C PARKING P PROPOSED PIPE PROPOS<ED METRO O : CS '('OWER TELCO `� BOLLARD. TYP. OF (3) _ TOTAL /P ROUTE IN 41 j `\`"`' ```y JOINT TRENCH WITHIN ` /, '- -��� �� PROPOSED 5' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT 3 EQUIPMENT/ LEASE AREA PLAN SCALE: 0 t 1 05/25/071 90% ZONING j O 06 DB 07 i w O �C7 g86 °oU ,L d z5w l �ag 0 < o E U) I— 0 t 1 PROJECT NO. SF192DOC DRAWN BY JV CHECKED BY MICHAEL MLK 1 05/25/071 90% ZONING j O 06 DB 07 100% ZONING 3 Q G) °oU oL) N W F— Q O < o `LL v/ U) I— C0 � Q W 04 10 PROJECT NO. SF192DOC DRAWN BY JV CHECKED BY MICHAEL MLK 1 ET TITLE ENLARGED PROJECT AREA PLAN ANTENNA LAYOUTS ET NUMBER A -3 .j 05/25/071 90% ZONING 2 06 DB 07 100% ZONING 3 06/21/07 100% ZONING REV 4 09/2B/07 100% ZONING REV ET TITLE ENLARGED PROJECT AREA PLAN ANTENNA LAYOUTS ET NUMBER A -3 .j i f t ( r i K o a 0 ° z S J 90% ZONING m I ^ ro m (E) TREE, TYP.- U= C) (E) CHURCH - F- t1 O BUILDING I m o +�1 �OC)� � o U K z U) (E) STORAGE, SHE[ °w TO BE RELOCATED (E) STORM CONTAINER (E) CROSS STRUCTURE TO BE x Michael Wilk Architecture 1 833 Market Street, Suite 803 San Francisco, CA 94103 tel: 415.839.9594 fax: 415.904.8388 i EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION k 1 11 1 1 Z w Z 05/25/07 90% ZONING a oV) �N w° 06/08/07 S Y U= g85 U F- " W $ 5 a a� <o �OC)� � o U K z U) F-Q °w z PROPOSED METRO PCS GPS ANTENNA. / °w N o PAINT TO MATCH (E) C) o m BLDG. O K � v 4 ° 0 o n o 0 0 m I 00 h rn I 0 N (E) STORAGE SHED TO BE RELOCATED PROPOSED PIPE BOLLARD, TYP. OF 3 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION (E) STORAGE CONTAINER NEW LOCATION OF (E) STORAGE SHED / PROPOSED METRO PCS EQUIPMENT/ LEASE AREA STILE 2 inc. 05/25/07 90% ZONING jO 06/08/07 S Y U= g85 U F- " W $ 5 a �O <o �OC)� � 2 05/25/07 90% ZONING jO 06/08/07 100% ZONING U= Qa) U F- " W Q �O <o �OC)� � U) F-Q W � fn PROJECT NO. SF1920DC DRAWN BY JV CHECKED BY MICHAEL MLK 1 ELEVATIONS NUMBER A -5 05/25/07 90% ZONING 2 06/08/07 100% ZONING 3 06/21/07 100% ZONING REV 4 09/2B/07 100% ZONING REV ELEVATIONS NUMBER A -5