Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03-26-2008 Planning Commission Packet
r° pAfomis and procedures speaker slips SUBJECT CITY OF SARATOGA . REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION q AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 DATE G TELEPHONE NO TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT: (Please read instructions on reverse side) ��7.33 q- ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and proceed to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss.. No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members are discussing the item. Following the discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject: Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. p: \fomis and procedures\speaker slips CITY OF SARATOGA T TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION �a, ADDRESS 1.9 7S S 06t SUBJECT AGENDA ITEM NO. DATE Z 6 TELEPHONE NO.' f �J �(� 7 TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT: �. L (Please read instructions on reverse side) ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and proceed to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss. No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members are discussing the item. Following the discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and .your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. p: orris an pr CITY OF SARATOGA REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION NAME �l�/► It /1° l� e ADDRESS 7�3 3 106tj�g SUBJECT f5 v4k.s 54 (f4 �Ge, (7 PPt / AGENDA ITEM NO. DATE 2� 6� TELEPHONE NO. TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT: 9-7 (Please read instructions on reverse side) p: \fomis and procedures\speaker slips ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE FLANNINU UUMMINS-KJN�. Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and proceed to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss. No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members are discussing the item. Following the discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. CITY OF SARATOGA REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION NAME �/� L n ADDRESS / `7 70 d 0 L't V CS S' L . SUBJECT oZ. (0 13 I S-/- • �L-C�Y��° `s AGENDA ITEM NO. DATE ri-% J� TELEPHONE NO. G' C 7y1 o l 6 TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT: -7 9 2-(0 PM (Please read instructions on reverse side) ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and proceed to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss. No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the .members are discussing the item. Following the discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and, your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. CITY OF SARATOGA REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION NAME I)Idy( �yl� A""'A 0- A ADDRESS 7-0701 � �► C � Gr dr—� SUBJECT AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 DATE 2 62 TELEPHONE NO. -7 411-0-73 Z TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT: 6 it 50 ez (Please read instructions on reverse side) ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and proceed to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss. No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members are discussing the item. Following the discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. pAfomis ano pr a CITY OF SARATOGA REQUEST TO ADDRESS NNING COMMISSION NAMF. ADDRESS- SUBJECT— AGENDA ITEM NO. DAT � r TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT: • \ pAfomis and procedures\speaker slips � D73 r TELEPHONE NO. 1 r (Please read instructions on reverse side) ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and proceed to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss. No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time e that the members are discussing the item. Following the discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. CITY OF SARATOGA REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION NAME ADDRESS SUBJECT AGENDA ITEM NO. DATO TELEPHONE NO. ZS (2:tS7Z ( � TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT: T (Please read instructions on reverse side) \fnm�c and nrnredurec \snenker slins ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and proceed to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss. No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members are discussing the item. Following the discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. pAfomu and procedures speaker slips CITY OF SARATOGA REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADDRESS / L170(-'& 0(-A 6-'-- SUBJECT AGENDA ITEM NO. DATE TELEPHONE NO. -761 Z TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT: 9 ? (Please read instructions on reverse side) ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and proceed to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss. No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members.-are discussing the item. Following the discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. Y.�..n..0 auu y.ucwu.woycanc. m.ya CITY OF SARATOGA c REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION NAME /l L'`� 1 �.►�S i ADDRESS SUBJECT AGENDA ITEM ITEM NO. DATE �D TELEPHONE NO. V, 7 73 2-3 J TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT: �! (Please read instructions on reverse side) pAfonns and procedures speaker slips ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and proceed to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss. No. member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members are discussing the item. Following the discussion, and prior to.a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. CITY OF SARATOGA REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION �n J �, 'R, "I yl (, S rt-,� ADDRESS SUBJECT AGENDA ITEM NO. _ DATE 3 TELEPHONE NO. TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT: (Please read instructions on reverse side) p:\fomis and procedures\speaker slips ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PL Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and.proceed to comment upon the agenda item you wish -to discuss. No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members are discussing the item. Following the discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. NAME CITY OF SARATOGA REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADDRESS _ t C). SUBJECT AGENDA ITEM NO. DATE �4 TELEPHONE NO. ? 3 TIME OF DAY CARD IS FILLED OUT: (Please read instructions on reverse side) ANY PERSON DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Please approach the rostrum and, after receiving recognition from the Chair, state your name and address and proceed to comment upon the agenda item you wish to discuss. No member of the audience will be called upon to address the Commission on any subject during the time that the members are discussing the item. Following the discussion, and prior to a vote, the Chair will recognize any member of the audience who wishes to speak on the subject. Speakers will be recognized in the order these cards are filled out. You are welcome to attend all Planning Commission meetings, and your interest in the conduct of public business is appreciated. CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION SITE VISIT AGENDA DATE: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 — Approximately 3:30 p.m. — 5:00 p.m. PLACE: City Hall Parking Lot, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue TYPE: Site Visit Committee SITE VISITS WILL BE MADE TO THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ROLL CALL REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA AGENDA 1. APPLICATION 4PDR07 -0018 2. APPLICATION #PDR07 -0010 0 3. APPLICATION #PDR07 -0016 • 18853 Allendale Avenue Lee 13414 Surrey Lane Lu 20731 St.Charles Estahbanti The Site Visit Committee is comprised of interested Planning Commission members. The committee conducts site visits to properties that are new items on the Planning Commission Agenda. The site visits are held on the Tuesday preceding the Wednesday hearing, between 3:30 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. It is encouraged that the applicant and/or -owner to be present to answer any questions that may arise. Site visits are generally short (10 to 20 minutes) because of time constraints. Any presentations and testimony you may wish to give should be saved for the Public Hearing. During the Site Visit, the Planning Commission may only discuss items related to the project. The agenda does not allow any formal votes or motions on the proposed project or other matters. The Site Visit is a fact - finding meeting where the Commission may discuss the item and ask questions from or hear statements from members of the public attending the Visit. No comments made during the Site Visit by the Planning Commission are binding or required to be carried through to the formal public hearing where actions will be taken on the proposed project. P:\PC SITE VISITS \Site Visits\2008\SVA 032508.doc • CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA DATE: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 - 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Council Chambers /Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting ROLL CALL: Commissioners Manny Cappello, Rishi Kumar, Robert Kundtz, Susie Nagpal, Linda Rodgers, Yan Zhao and Chair Joyce Hlava PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: MINUTES: Draft Minutes from Regular Planning Commission Meeting of March 12, 2008 ORAL COMMUNICATION: - - -- -Any member-of-the Public will-be allowed to-address-the Planning Commission for up to three.minutes on matters not on this agenda. The law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Planning Commission may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Planning Commission direction to Staff. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS- PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTION TO STAFF: REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on March 20, 2008 REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS: If you wish to appeal any decision on this Agenda, you may file an "Appeal Application" with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15- 90.050 (b). CONSENT CALENDAR: None PUBLIC HEARINGS: All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. Applicants /Appellants and their representatives have a total of ten minutes maximum for opening statements.. Members of the Public may comment on any item for up to three minutes. Applicant /Appellants and their representatives have a total of five minutes maximum for closing statements. 1. APPLICATION #PDR07 -0018 (389 -30 -015) LEE; 18853 ALLENDALE AVENUE: - The applicant requests Design Review approval to remove an existing one story single - family residence and construct a new approximately 6,015 square feet one -story single family residence with a proposed height of approximately 21 feet. The net lot size is approximately .92 acres. The site is zoned R -1- 40,000 (Christopher Riordan) 2. APPLICATION #PDR07 -0010 (503 -16 -017) LU; 13414 SURREY LANE (Address changed to 13426 Surrey Lane) — The applicant requests Design Review approval to demolish the existing home and 0 construct a new two -story home. The proposed structure will be approximately 5,515 square feet and approximately 25 -feet 11- inches tall. The gross lot size is 47,480 square feet, and the site is zoned R -1- 40,000. Design Review is required pursuant to City Code section 15- 45.060. (Shweta Bhatt) P: \PC Agendas\2008 \032608.doc 3. APPLICATION #PDR07 -0016 (517 -08 -025) ESTAHBANATI; 20731 ST. CHARLES STREET —.The applicant requests Design Review approval to demolish the existing home and construct a new two -story home. The proposed structure will be approximately 2,530 square feet and approximately 22 -feet 8.5= inches tall. The gross lot size is 6,012 square feet, and the site is zoned R -1- 10,000. Design Review is required pursuant to City Code section 15- 45.060. (Shweta Bhatt) 0 DIRECTORS ITEM: - None COMMISSION ITEMS: None COMMUNICATIONS None ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING - Wednesday, April 9, 2008 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers /Civic Theater 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (408) 868 -1269 or ctclerk@saratoga.ca.us. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102- 35.104 ADA Title II). Certificate of Posting of Agenda: I, Abby Ayende, Office Specialist for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga was posted on March 20,. 2008 at the office of the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 and was available for public review at that location. The agenda is also available on the City's website at www.saratoga.ca.us If you would like to receive the Agenda's via e-mail, please send your e-mail address to plannin2(u %sarato2a.ca.us NOTE: To view previous Planning Commission meetings anytime, go the City Video Archives at www.saratoga.ca.us ' • PAPC Agendas\2008 \032608.doc • MINUTES SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 PLACE: Council Chambers /Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, .Saratoga, CA TYPE: Regular Meeting Chair Hlava called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Cappello, Hlava, Kumar, Kundtz, Nagpal, Rodgers and Zhao Absent: None Staff: Director John Livingstone, Associate Planner Shweta Bhatt and Assistant City Attorney Bill Parkin PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES — Regular Meeting of February 27, 2008. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Kundtz, seconded by Commissioner Rodgers, the Planning Commission minutes of the regular meeting of February 27, 2008, were adopted with edits to pages 3 and 9. (6- 0 -0 -1,; Commissioner Nagpal abstained) ORAL COMMUNICATION There were no Oral Communications. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA Director John Livingstone announced that, pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on March 6, 2008. CONSENT CALENDAR There were no Consent Calendar items. r Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of March 12, 2008 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM NO. 1 APPLICATION ZOA07 -0001 (City- Wide): The Planning Commission will consider a draft ordinance that will update existing regulations regarding fences, walls and hedges. The drat ordinance proposes to 1) establish an exception process that would allow property. owners to, exceed the maximum permitted fence height; 2) add fence height limitations around driveway aprons; and 3) clarify ambiguous language and areas of the code that are currently difficult to enforce. Other related topics, such as regulations regarding chain link fencing, an initial study and negative declaration for the project will also be reviewed and discussed. Ms. Shweta Bhatt, Associate Planner, presented the staff report as follows: • Reported that the Commission is being asked to review proposed changes to the draft ordinance that pertains to fences; walls and hedges. • Stated that topics of interest include chain link fences, which are currently prohibited in the Hillside District but not elsewhere in, the City. Proposed changes would make the Code. consistent by prohibiting chain link fences throughout the City. • Added that a letter in opposition of this recommendation was received and included in the packet. • Said that the Planning Commission discussed eliminating height restrictions for hedges and directed staff to include language in the Code to this effect. • Stated that letters from the public were received that suggested that hedges have a height limitation. The most recent was emailed to the Planning Commission and distributed this evening. • Said that language is proposed that fences be measured from the higher property where two properties differ in elevation. • Said that staff received feedback from the public regarding this topic suggesting that it be measured from the lower property to avoid exceptionally tall fences and walls on the lower side. • Added that feedback was also received this afternoon regarding a concern about the proposed language about triangles of visibility particularly how they impact. smaller lots. • Advised that an exception process has been added to the proposed language and four findings are proposed to help evaluate exceptions. • Informed that members of the public_ are present this evening. to speak on the issues and provide comments Commissioner Nagpal asked if. chain link fencing would be prohibited all over Saratoga,, Chain link fencing is allowed in rear yards right now. Would chain link fencing continue to be allowed in backyards? Planner Shweta Bhatt said that throughout the City, chain link fencing would not be allowed under the proposed amended ordinance. Right now, chain link fencing is only allowed for sports courts. Commissioner Cappello asked if chain link fencing would be prohibited for sports courts with the ordinance amendment. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of March 12, 2008 Page.3 Planner Shweta Bhatt replied that chain link fencing would still be allowed for sports courts. Commissioner Zhao asked how legal non- conforming fences would be dealt with. How are they determined as legal? What about pre- existing fencing? Director John Livingstone said that pre- existing fencing would be subject to Community Development Director review. In the past, old photographs were used to substantiate the age of fencing. There are different ways to prove when a fence was installed. He added that fences don't typically require a building permit. It might take some work to determine legal non- conforming fencing. Chair Hlava pointed at that when non- conforming houses burn down, they cannot be rebuilt to the non - conforming standard but would rather have to conform to current code requirements. She pointed out that while a non - conforming wood fence would eventually rot and have to be rebuilt to code standards, fences in materials such as wrought iron could last forever. The result is that they seem to be treated differently. Director John Livingstone agreed that wood fences last less time than do other types of fences. Commissioner Rodgers reminded that Hillside zoning is limited to a 4,000 square foot enclosed area. Swimming pools must be enclosed and are permitted a 10 -foot area to be enclosed around the swimming pool. P'anneF Shweta Bhatt said that the I 0--fo ot enclo suire are -2 aroi-ind a pool applies when there is already an enclosed fence area of 4,000 square feet on a Hillside zoned property. If a separate fence is required to enclose a pool elsewhere on a Hillside zoned property that is outside of the 4,000 square foot fenced in area, that pool fence must follow the contours of the pool by a maximum of 10 -feet. Director John Livingstone reiterated that per code, pools must be enclosed. There must be a fence around a pool. In the Hillside district, if that property already has the maximum allowed 4,000 square foot fence - enclosed area, pool fencing is limited to a 10 -foot distance around the pool contours. On other residential zoning district properties, pools are generally located within an enclosed backyard on a typical smaller lot. Commissioner Rodgers asked why a fence exemption for pools is required. Director John Livingstone gave the example of a 10 -acre lot with a 4,000 square foot enclosed fence area on one side of a property. A pool is located on the other side of the property. If there are large trees on each side of a pool, the fencing might not best be limited to the 10- foot contour so the exception is .available for consideration to retain said trees and allow them to be located within the enclosure if necessary to retain them. Commissioner Rodgers said that this exception is not intended to allow expansion above the allowed 4,000 square foot fence enclosure area. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of March 12, 2008 Page 4 Director John Livingstone replied no and said that the exception would be a difficult process. Commissioner Zhao asked about when the amount of allowable enclosure area above 4,000 square feet might be permitted in the Hillside district. Director John Livingstone said that more fencing could be installed on a Hillside zoned property if there are periodic 30 -foot wide gaps in sections of the fence to allow natural access for wildlife to pass through. Chair Hlava said that. one issue up for discussion on chain link fencing is whether black or some other color should be required to best blend into the landscape. Commissioner Nagpal said that there had been some discussion of allowing chain link fencing on certain sized residential lots with some mention of color to obscure visibility. Chair Hlava agreed that it must be something other than silver. Commissioner Rodgers said that chain link fencing in districts other than Hillside should only be allowed for recreational courts. Commissioner Nagpal again said that-she had thought there was discussion to allow chain link fencing for larger lots. Director John Livingstone said that there was no direct instruction to that effect so staff started • l.,ith nn nhnin link__fenrP-q-anvwhere in the community except for snorts courts to start the discussion. Chair Hlava opened the public hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Mr. Bruce La Fountain, Resident on Pierce Road: • Said that he wrote a letter regarding use of chain link fencing. • Added that he is available for questions regarding his comments and pictures. Chair Hlava asked Mr. Bruce La Fountain if he is in favor of chain link fencing on Hillside district properties. Mr. Bruce La Fountain: • Explained that he owns five adjacent properties, three of which are large. On all of his properties there is chain link fencing, none of which is visible from the road. • Added that he took great pains.to create a trail through all of his properties that allows wildlife to pass through. • Reported that he toured the whole community and found lots of chain link fencing out there. It is a prevalent material. • Advised that he was surprised when Code Enforcement contacted him about his fencing. • Expressed concern about the uniformity of enforcement. • Reiterated that there is chain link fencing everywhere in every kind of application. • Pointed out that in a large open area, one really cannot see it and it looks acceptable. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of March 12, 2008 Page 5 • Added that it is a high quality product and is the product of choice for the Forest Service. Commissioner Rodgers asked what color is his chain link fencing. Mr. Bruce La Fountain said that he bought sections in brown, green and black and chose black as the most invisible. Chair Hlava reported her understanding that the Hillside Initiative of 1980 created a prohibition of chain link fencing on the hillside. This restriction may not be able to be changed. Mr. Bruce La Fountain asked the reason for the size of spacing for the wire to be four inches. Is it because of birds? Chair Hlava said that it is for birds, rabbits and field mice to clear. She added that it is not to keep deer from eating people's gardens. Mr. Bruce La Fountain said he was less concern about deer than he was about coyotes eating cats. Commissioner Rodgers said that cats should be kept indoors any way. Chair Hlava said that some properties have barn cats to provide rodent control. Mr. Bill Breck, Resident on Saratoga -Los Gatos Road: • OdIU uiat ne is cu11Wc111cU -au . • Thanked staff, particularly Shweta Bhatt and John Livingstone, as well as the Planning Commission for their efforts. • Said that this amendment is creating way too many changes at once and it would be better to take smaller bites. • Reported that he has an historic house and has for about 10 years. • Stressed that he is against the proposed three -foot hedge height limitation at the front of his property, as it would result in a loss of privacy on his property. • Stated that there are three driveways onto his property, two his and another belongs to his neighbor. • Asked for some data that proves this requirement increases public safety. • Said that this is a very big change and that 70 to 80 percent of properties have hedges to get front yard privacy. • Opined that this is starting to feel like a gated community. • Pointed out that codes are only enforced if a neighbor complains and the community cannot have that as a policy. It is not good for neighbor relationships. • Cautioned that next, there will be dictating on acceptable car colors. • Reiterated his request for data on safety. Have there been lots of accidents documented? • Said he would like to see more justification. • Suggested that smaller lots have different standards, as the hedge is the only tool these owners have. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of March 12, 2008 Page 6 ' Chair Hlava asked Mr. Bill Breck if he owns the Young's house. Mr. Bill Breck replied yes. Commissioner Nagpal suggested that there are alternative ways of viewing traffic such as mirrors. Mr. Bill Breck: • " Agreed and said he has no problem with something like that as an alternative. That is very reasonable. • Questioned whether there was going to be any grandfathering of pre- existing conditions. • Cautioned that this requirement could change the character of many neighborhoods. • Added that lots of changes would have to be undergone to comply with this provision. Mr. Drew Perkins, Resident on Vista Arroyo Court: • Said that he has lived in the Parker Ranch neighborhood of Saratoga since about 2000. • Said that these hilltop properties overlook the valley and hills. • Expressed concern if hedges are not restricted in height in someway. • Added that he is not concerned with cutting them back to three -foot heights as much as he, . is concerned with them growing to 75 feet or more. A 75 -foot high hedge will obscure views of mountains and scenery. • Suggested that hedges be regulated like walls are regulated. • Questioned why hedges should not be regulated. Commissioner Nagpal said that she believes in use of green fences. She asked, if some language is added that deals with impacts to views would that e p alleviate r. Breck's concerns. Mr. Bill Breck questioned what that might actually mean. Commissioner Nagpal said that it .takes years for hedges 'to grow. They can be restricted to an upper- height limit, perhaps to no more than 75 feet. Mr. Bill Breck said that it depends upon context and application. In his case, 75 feet is better than 1,00. He added that 25 is even better than 75. Ms. Holly Davies, Resident on Oak Place: • Expressed her happiness with the concept of legalizing the use of lattice on six -foot tall. fences to help increase privacy. • Suggested that there be no height limitation on hedges. • Advised that in her neighborhood, these hedges are needed. She said that she needs her high hedge to shield her property, as they must deal with high visitor traffic on smaller lots.; Federated Church was a medium -sized church when she first moved into her home 32r. years ago. Now it is a mega- church. There is also the Foothill Club. Celebrate Saratoga'. leaves her neighborhood full of happy drunks. While the event is a part of the culture of this town, it is intense and she needs the hedge as a shield from all this activity in the; street. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of March 12, 2008 Page 7 . • Added that she objects to the proposal to limit the number of garden elements in the front yard. She needs them, including trellises, to create interest in her garden. • Informed that she is a rosarian. She has a collection of roses, some of which are rare, and she needs trellises for climbing roses. • Said that this proposed limitation is an intrusion into the life of citizens. • Suggested that it be left to each family to decide their landscaping. • Expressed her opposition to the vision triangle. • Added that not uniformly enforcing except through complaint creates conflicts between neighbors. Said that adding the triangle to the code could result in a rise in insurance rates as liability might increase. • Asked if the vision triangle is needed for every driveway in the city. • Said that vision triangles are okay for those properties on busy public streets and /or on corner lots. Chair Hlava thanked all speakers and closed the public hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Chair Hlava: • Suggested discussing the issues raised by the public including the use of chain link fencing on Hillside zoned properties. Reiterated her belief that this issue was included on the Hillside Initiative. Commissioner. Nagpal reminded that issues previously discussed included the impacts of not allowing chain link fencing on hillside properties as well as consideration of allowing use of chain link fencing on lots larger than 40,000 square feet. Commissioner Rodgers added that properties in the flatlands were also raised including smaller lots. Commissioner Nagpal: • Said that one question to consider is just how prevalent are chain link fences. • Said that use of colors other than silver could help enhance the invisibility of chain link fencing. • Stressed the need to minimize the impact from the public street and to keep chain link fencing at the back with something grown on it to hide it. • Questioned whether chain link fencing should be allowed throughout Saratoga. • Recounted that in her neighborhood there is a lot of existing chain link fencing. Commissioner Cappello questioned the use of chain link fencing around the perimeter of a hillside property. Commissioner Nagpal reminded of the restring within the Hillside zoning that allows only 4,000 square feet of enclosed fencing. Commissioner Cappello asked how some of the existing chain link fencing is being used in the hillside in violation of the 4,000 square foot limitation. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of March 12, 2008 Page 8 Chair Hlava: • Reminded that if there are periodic openings (30 foot gaps) left to allow wildlife passage through, there is no limitation. • Suggested that the Commission focus on flatland now rather than Hillside zoning.. • She said that one sees chain link fencing more on large lots while small lots tend to use wood fences to create privacy. Director John Livingstone: • Suggested that the Commission take a straw vote, limiting it to the consideration of the Hillside zoning district first. If the Commission is in favor of allowing chain link fencing in the Hillside zoning district, staff can do the necessary research. If the Commission were not interested, staff would not have to do the research. • Added that following the straw vote as it pertains to Hillside residential, the Commission would work its way down to the flatlands. Commissioner Nagpal asked Commissioners Kundtz and Rodgers what they thought about this issue of chain link on the hillside. Commissioner Rodgers said that on lower properties and in farm country, she has no problem with the use of chain link fencing. In a residential area and visible from the public.street, she does not find chain link fencing to be attractive or appropriate. They are fine in an enclosed' garden. If allowed on a hillside property, green pretty visible and black would be the best,' as she has seen. Commissioner un • Agreed, saying they should require a permit and to be black chain link fencing., • Added that he finds black chain link fencing to be totally invisible. • Stated that for 40,000 square foot. lots and in the lower flatlands, this issue is more, sensitive. • Said that wrought iron fencing is more attractive than chain link fencing. Commissioner Nagpal said it appears that chain link fencing could be supported on Hillside; zoned properties with color that blends into its environment (i.e. black). Commissioner Rodgers stressed that chain link fencing should not be visible from the public street. Commissioner Nagpal asked which area should allow chain link fencing, hillside versus lower. flatland areas. Chair Hlava suggested that all zoning districts should be called out where such fencing would- be permitted. She asked if the intent is to allow unlimited use. Commissioner Nagpal said within 4,000 square feet in fencing area should remain the standard in the Hillside district. • Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of March 12, 2008 Page 9 Commissioner Kundtz reminded that there is the provision to have more use of chain link on the hillside if the chain link fence is broken up by 30 -foot wide openings. Chair Hlava asked what about 40,000 square foot lots and those properties in the flatland areas of Saratoga. Should such fencing be allowed in the back yards? Commissioner Nagpal pointed out that chain link fencing is nicer than a wood fence for back yard properties that back onto a creek. Chair Hlava expressed support for allowing chain link fencing in back yards as long as not visible from the street. Director John Livingstone said it appears that three of four of the Commissioners support allowing chain link fences on the Hillside zoning district if they are. black clad. As one moves down the hill it appears that chain link fencing is okay. He asked if it can be said that chain link fencing is acceptable citywide? Commissioner Nagpal said she could support it on 40,000 square foot lots. Chair Hlava agreed not citywide but okay on 40,000 square foot lots. Commissioner Kundtz asked how curb appeal can be addressed going uphill. 'He pointed out that there are two or three houses with wrought iron fences. Up further, in a more rural area, the fencing changes to chain link. Commissioner Nagpal agreed that this is the hard part. If chain link is found to be acceptable it must be a color that minimizes the impact on the public as seen from the right-of-Way.- Chair Hlava pointed out that chain link fencing within a back yard on a flatland property is not visible to the public. However, on a hillside property, everyone can see it. That .issue is worth some research. Commissioner Nagpal said that this is a good starting point and will likely have to come. back to this Commission. She asked about how to deal with existing non - conforming situations. Director John Livingstone said that right now chain link fencing is not allowed. Chair Hlava said that this issue would need to be looked into. Commissioner Nagpal said that she must say that there are lots of chain link fences on the hillside. Director John Livingstone said that this issue might end up as an election level item and go onto a ballot. Right now, in general terms, chain link fencing could be allowed on the top of the hillside and go from there. Commissioner Nagpal said she supports looking into it but where to start. 9p pp 9 Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of March 1.2, 2008 Page 10 Commissioner Rodgers replied with the Hillside Residential zoning district. Chair Hlava agreed. Commissioner Cappello said he could support this with caveats including use of color and the restriction of not being visible from the street. In rural areas there should be an exception:. provision. Commissioner Kumar said he supports the concept of staff researching these issues further. Chair Hlava asked if chain link is currently not allowed in the Hillside district. Director John Livingstone replied that under current Code it is allowed. Chair Hlava said she personally could only support use of chain link fencing in properties that are a minimum of 40,000 square feet. However, it may end up being best to leave it as. it is. Commissioner Nagpal said that the issue of color that enhances the invisibility from the public street must be considered. Commissioner Rodgers pointed out that some people install wood slats into a chain link fence.' Commissioner Cappello asked if vines cover a chain link fence, does it become a green fence. n.. AI.,. pal said that good cmnR_Shc ariricrt th2m it � iccri to- be so F1it�- �ivl�ei —r considered. 'r Director John Livingstone, advised that the description of a hedge is one that can stand up on its own. Commissioner Cappello said he still has more of a problem.with fences on the flatlands than he does on the. hillsides. Commissioner Nagpal asked Commissioner Cappello if he thinks chain link fencing should not be allowed. Commissioner Cappello pointed out that one does not hear of issues, complaints or. problems that result from the use of chain link fencing. Chair Hlava said that she does not feel this prohibition is enforceable, especially as fence installations do not require, a building permit. Commissioner Nagpal said that allowing a three -foot high chain link fencing in a front yard could be allowed under current code. She added that she would be concerned if that was installed. Chair Hlava said why mess with this if it hasn't been an issue. 1] • Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of March 12, 2008 Page 11 Commissioner Rodgers asked the City Attorney whether discussion by this Planning Commission of -the concept about banning a type of fencing but does not result in being prohibited, does it allow people to ask for such fencing in the future. City.Attorney Bill Parkin said that any provisions ultimately adopted in the ordinance would mandate what will be allowed or not. Commissioner Rodgers said that if there is no specific prohibition of chain link fencing that is visible from the street, it would be allowed. Commissioner Zhao said that she would like to keep the regulations as they are currently for the flatland areas. This is for smaller lots up to 40,000 square foot lots. If not, she said she believes it results in discrimination against smaller lots. Commissioner Nagpal asked staff asked if there have been a lot of complaints about chain link fencing. Director John Livingstone replied no, especially since no permit is required for installation Commissioner Nagpal said she might be okay with leaving it as it is. Chair Hlava said that is her thought too. GOmmiceiOpW - Cappello, - • Stated that if his neighbor would install chain link fencing in his front year, he would have an issue with that. • Advised that he simply does not like chain link fencing. • Added that if it is invisible from view, it becomes a moot point although he would like to see chain link fencing prohibited. Commissioner Kumar said that there are not a lot of chain link fences. He said he too personally does not like them. He added that he is leaning toward changing the ordinance and creating enforcement on chain link fencing. Director John Livingstone restated his understanding of the Commission's feelings to this point. They support chain link fencing in the Hillside district but want to leave the requirements for the flatland area as it is. Chain link fencing would be allowed throughout the community with specific requirements including being invisible from the street. Chair Hlava suggested not allowing chain link fencing in front yards. Commissioner Nagpal said that the right use of color would help this fencing blend into the environment so as to be invisible. Chair Hlava again said she does not think this is enforceable. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of March 12, 2008 Page 12 ' Commissioner Nagpal said that there would have to be some mechanism in the ordinance to enforce it. Commissioner Zhao said that the idea of such a fence once covered in vines must be taken into consideration. City Attorney Bill Parkin said that visibility is a subjective issue and would require an exception process. He said that specific standards, such as not be allowed in the front yard and /or use of specific colors, are more easily enforced. Chair Hlava restated the Commissioner's recommendations for use of black chain link fencing and prohibiting its use in front yards. City Attorney Bill Parkin said corner lots oftentimes front a street. He reiterated that the more subjective the regulation, the more design review is necessary. Chair Hlava: • Agreed that objective standards are necessary. • Suggested moving on to other issues including hedge heights and green fences; view triangles for private driveways; and use of garden elements. City Attorney Bill Parkin explained that the proposed restrictions are for side. and rear setback areas. Outside of that, higher hedges are not regulated by this ordinance. He said the Commission might want to consider if it wants hedge height restrictions only at lot.lines, withirf Tnte d within 16 feet of Commissioner Nagpal said that hedges are not fences in the ordinance right now and that use of a row of Italian Cypress is not regulated today. City Attorney Bill Parkin replied correct. Commissioner Nagpal said that.she would hate to see all the existing Italian Cypress chopped down. She said, she is open to discussion, including possibly a discussion of view: impact. Chair Hlava said that under the amended ordinance, fences anywhere on a lot could only be 6 feet tall. -Right now, only the side yard and back fence heights are limited. .Commissioner Nagpal asked if the provisions for accessory structures would come into play. Director John Livingstone said that there is no definition of when a fence becomes an accessory structure. It is easier for staff to enforce to keep the ordinance as it is- and refer applicability to the entire lot. Chair Hlava said she often sees tall hedges in the middle point of some back yards. • 1 Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of March 12, 2008 Page 13 Commissioner Nagpal said it could take 25. years for trees to get_ to that point. She suggested looking at this from a view impacts perspective. She said she wants to see an allowance for a green hedge and not get around to treating them like a fence. Commissioner Cappello agreed that hedges offer some privacy. He suggested a view shed type of standard. City Attorney Bill Parkin: • Suggested that the Commission stay away from views as it creates an issue for enforcement. • Reminded that the City has its Tree Ordinance and the Commission does not want to conflict with that. • Cautioned that view sheds would be a nightmare for staff to deal with, as views are a very subjective issue. • Stated that restrictions on hedges need to be well thought out. Commissioner Cappello reminded that the Design Review process considers interference with views. Director John Livingstone said that there is a difference as Design Review deals with a permanent structure. Here you would be trying to regulate growth. The City does not regulate the planting of trees so this would be hard to enforce. Commissioner Rodgers agreed that it would be difficult to restrict what people plant. She added a most rees could not be topped to reduce their height. Director John Livingstone agreed that many species of trees should not be topped.' Chair Hlava said that the ordinance as currently written sets no limit on hedge heights either in front or rear yards. Now the definition of a hedge is a green fence. Commissioner Nagpal said that these hedges offer a buffer and can be found all over. She said that she could not imagine asking people to cut down their hedges because they don't match the new ordinance. Director John Livingstone clarify that the only change that pertains to hedges are those that might be located where a triangle view area might be required. Chair Hlava said that she does not see the requirement to cut down existing hedges. She suggested _ moving to the subject of garden elements. As proposed, only three garden elements would be permitted within a, front yard setback. That includes arbors and trellises. Commissioner Nagpal said that she appreciates gardeners so much as she did not inherit a green thumb. She said that the ordinance should not be restrictive. Chair Hlava said that this limit does not include garden gnomes and wrought iron benches, etc. Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of March 12, 2008 Page 14 Planner Shweta Bhatt clarified that the current version does not limit the number but rather just the height, limit and depth. Chair Hlava said that since there is no limit in number, just size, the Commission could turn to the subject of triangle of visibility. Director John Livingstone said that there is sometimes a problem with visibility for reverse lots and /or flag lots. He added that he is not. sure if there have been accidents or injuries but the visibility issue has come up. If there. is a six -foot fence at the edge of a driveway, a driver cannot see clearly to exit: Commissioner Rodgers asked, if there have. been accidents with injuries. She stated that there are alternative ways of dealing with visibility, including use of mirrors. She added that it might be helpful to post 'signs reading "Blind Driveway." She stated that she is not a fan of cutting down hedges to a three -foot height. Commissioner Nagpal asked if this provision is only at public intersections or is it intended for every person's driveway? She asked how, other cities regulate this. Director John Livingstone: • Explained that it is not uncommon to have regulations to leave a view triangle. • Said that one city had a 10 -foot standard. At one Study Session a 15 -foot standard was discussed. Right now, the proposal is down to 12- feet.. Said that with the solution for flag lot fencing, said fencing can create visibility problems. Commissioner Kundtz asked how to pick between no less than 10 and /or no rrpre than 15 feet? Commissioner Rodgers said it should be the traffic speed of the road on which the property is located. Commissioner Kundtz said that this represents many variables. Commissioner Nagpal asked if there is still a traffic safety committee. Director John Livingstone replied yes, and.said that the Public Works Department staffs it. He pointed out that 80 percent of the City is single - family residential. The majority of property owners who pull out onto a major arterial road ,(such as Saratoga -Los Gatos Road) typically control that view triangle for their own safety. Commissioner Nagpal asked if there is sufficient time to forward this issue to the Public Safety Commission. Director John Livingstone replied yes. Chair Hlava said she was concerned with the concept of having big established hedges that are more than 20 years old cut down. She said she would support other visibility assistance. F Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of March 12, 2008 Page 15 Commissioner Na 9P al agreed that mirrors or some other electronic, gadgetry might give people some options. She said they should not require permits. but rather owners should just be allowed to install them. Commissioner Kumar said that requiring a view triangle for every single driveway in Saratoga is excessive. Chair Hlava agreed and said it makes more sense for arterial streets Commissioner Kumar agreed and added perhaps for curvy streets. Director John Livingstone cautioned that mirrors help drivers but not pedestrians. He added that a mirror does not help a child on a bike while a view triangle benefits both pedestrian and driver. Commissioner Kumar said that drivers tend to back out carefully. Director John Livingstone said that staff is taking the direction from the Commission that requiring a view triangle should be an exception on busy roads but not be required citywide. Chair Hlava said that new construction should be required to have a triangle of visibility. Commissioner Rodgers said she would defer to the Traffic Safety Commission. C.hair Hlava red if that still exos`ed City Attorney Bill Parkin said yes. Chair Hlava. asked how it is referred to them. Director John Livingstone said this issue would be taken to their meeting. They meet twice a month. Chair Hlava said that staff would be asked to refer this matter to the Safety Commission to discuss applicability and or necessity to impose a triangle of visibility for driveways citywide versus only for those located on arterial streets. Commissioner Cappello added. that providing alternatives that would suffice would also be helpful. Chair Hlava asked if this item would come back to this Commission for additional public hearing. Commissioner Nagpal suggested that anyone listening should comment as they wish on these proposals. Chair Hlava asked if the continuance should be to a date uncertain. i Saratoga Planning Commission Minutes of March 12, 2008 Page 16 Director John Livingstone said a date certain with a buffer of time to get the Traffic Safety. Commission review would be fine. Chair Hlava suggested April 23`d meeting since two Commissioners will be absent from the first meeting in April. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Nagpal, seconded by. Commissioner Kundtz, the Planning Commission continued consideration of proposed amendments to the Fencing, Walls and Hedges Ordinance to its meeting of April 23, 2008. (7 -0) DIRECTOR'S ITEMS There were no Director's Items. COMMISSION ITEMS Commissioner Rodgers listed upcoming meeting dates including a Green Building Workshop on March 17th Chair Hlava mentioned the joint session with Council set for March 19th. She also mentioned her attendance at a workshop sponsored by City of San Jose and San Jose State University an updating Housing Elements. it was a very interesting session and Saratoga as ahead of other cities in its process. Commissioner Nagpal announced that she, Commissioner Rodgers and Chair H18va helped select the consultant, RBF Consulting, for Saratoga's Housing Element Update. COMMUNICATIONS There were no Communications Items. ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING Upon .motion of Commissioner Nagpal, seconded by Commissioner Cappello, Chair Hlava adjourned the meeting at approximately 9 p.m. MINUTES PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY: Corinne. A. Shinn, Minutes Clerk r E Item I - "PORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No./Location: PDR07-0018/18853 Allendale Avenue Type of Application: Design Review for a New Single-Family Applicant/Owner: Studio 02 (Applicant) Shiuh-Wuu & Yueh-Ying H. Lee Staff Planner: Christopher A. Riordan, AICP, Senior Planner Cd Date: March 26, 2008 APN: 389-30-015 Department Head: I John Livingstone, AICP, Director 4 AL j P<iL_ 18853 Allendale Avenue ZIA nj U;j RI a" IA gw ` 7 fig A2 Subject: 18853 Allendale Avenue 500' Radius 18853 Allendale Avenue Application No. PDR07- 0018118853 Allendale Avenue PROJECT HISTORY: Application filed: Application complete: Notice published: Mailing completed: Posting completed: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11/19/07 03/06/08 03/12/08 03/11/08 03/20/08 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project applicant requests Design Review approval to remove an existing one -story single - family residence and construct a proposed 6,016 square foot one -story single - family residence approximately 21 -feet tall (The Project). The net lot size is approximately .92- acres (40,034 square feet) and the site is zoned R -1- 40,000 (Single Family Residential). Zoning Code Section 15- 45.060 states any new single -story structure over 18 feet in height or whenever, as a result of proposed construction, reconstruction or expansion, the gross floor area of all structures on a site will exceed 6,000 square -feet, Design Review approval is required by the Planning Commission. The proposal consists of a new single -story structure taller than 18 feet and exceeds 6,000 square -feet; therefore, Planning Commission review is required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve this Design Review application with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. Staff is not recommending any permanent conditions of approval. 2 • • Application No. PDR07- 0018118853 Allendale Avenue 0 STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R -1- 40,000 • GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Low Density (RLD) MEASURE G: Not Applicable PARCEL SIZE: 40,034 sq. ft. gross /net SLOPE: Approximately 2.9 % average site slope GRADING REQUIRED: Grading is limited to landscaping and positive drainage around the building of not more than 10 cubic yards and 120 cubic yards for construction of the pool. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed application is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 of Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 ( "CEQA Guidelines "). This exemption allows for the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures. An example of this exception is the construction of one single - family residence in a residential zone. Colors: Stucco will be used for the majority Materials and J tY of the front elevation of the building and all of the rear and side elevations. Slate tile will be used as accents for the garage elevation facing the street. A limestone veneer will be used for the bottom third of the front elevation. The exterior of the front entrance will be covered in travertine tile. Two pre -cast stone columns will be placed on both sides of the iron and glass front door. Windows will be "powder- coated" aluminum clad wood windows and will be "mahogany red" in color. Fiberglass covered metal garage doors will have a wood grain appearance and will be "mahogany red" in color to match the windows. Wrought iron fencing black in color will be used for the accessible ramp providing access to the bedroom adjacent to the garage. A pre -cast stone balustrade will be constructed on the right side of the front elevation adjacent to the library. Copper standing seam roofs will be used for the front elevation bay window in the library, the rear elevation bay window in the family room/kitchen, and the barrel dormers. Roofing materials will be composed of clay roof tiles with an "old mission blend" color blend. A colors and materials board is available on file with the Community Development Department and will be present at the site visit and public hearing. k� Application No. PDR07- 0018118853 Allendale Avenue Detail Colors and Material Mfg. & Specification # Net Site Area: 40,034 Powder- coated aluminum Windows clad wood windows, "Mesa Jeld -Wen Residence /Lightwell Red" in color Driveway: 3,466.00 Hubbard Iron Doors, Front Door Iron an d glass "Beverley Hills" Ramps/Walkways /Steps Wood grain appearance Wayne Dalton. Garage Door fiberglass covered metal. Model 9800. TOTAL Site Coverage "Mesa Red" in color Floor Area MCA, B301 "Old Mission Roof Spanish Tile Blend " PRnjFCT DATAi R -140,000 Zoning Proposed Required Net Site Area: 40,034 Site Coverage Residence /Lightwell 6,080.71 Driveway: 3,466.00 Patios/Planter 1,858.00 Maximum Allowable Ramps/Walkways /Steps 1,728.00.00 = 14,012 SF (35 %) Pool/Equipment: 856.00 TOTAL Site Coverage 13,989 SF (34.6 %) Floor Area Maximum Allowable Proposed First Floor Area: 5,216.04 SF = Proposed Garage 799.66 6,020 SF TOTAL Proposed Floor Area 6,015.71 SF , Setbacks First Second First Second Floor Floor Floor Floor Front: 47 Feet NA 30 Feet NA 2 Inches Rear: 74 Feet NA 50 Feet NA 7 Inches Left Side: 31 Feet NA 20 Feet NA 0 Inches -Right Side: 25 Feet NA 20 Feet NA 1.5 Inches Height Lowest Elevation Point: 98' — 6 1/2" Maximum Height = Highest Elevation Point: 100' — 2 7/8" .125'— 4 11/16" Average Elevation Point: 99' — 4 11/16" (26 Feet) Proposed Topmost Point:. 120'— 7 3/16" Proposed Height in Feet 20'- 11.5" • Application No. PDR07- 0018118853 Allendale Avenue , PROJECT DISCUSSION AND SITE CHARACTERISICS The applicant is requesting Design Review approval to demolish an existing one -story, single- family residence and construct a new 6,020 square foot single - family residence with a basement. The approximately 1,659 square foot basement is not included in the total floor area because the basement is less than 42 inches above grade. The maximum height of the proposed residence will be approximately 21 feet tall and will be located in the R -1- 40,000 zone district (The Project). The project is located on the north side of Allendale Avenue between Camino Barco and Serra Oaks Court. Located across the street are a vineyard, a single -story home, and the Saint Archangel Michael Serbian Orthodox Church. The two homes to the left of the project are both two stories. The homes to the right and rear of the project are both single -story. Many of the homes on Allendale Avenue are not visible from the street due to -the predominant use of trees, shrubs, and tall hedges. The applicant has described the architectural style of the residence as modern Mediterranean Revival, an architectural theme with asymmetrical massing common to California, the Santa Clara Valley, and the City of Saratoga. Stucco will be used for the majority of the buildings front elevation and all of the rear and side elevations. Slate tile will be used as accents for the garage elevation facing the street. A limestone veneer will be used as trim around the front windows and along the bottom third of the front elevation. The exterior of the front entrance will be covered in travertine tile. Two pre -cast stone columns will be placed on both sides of the iron and glass front door. Windows will be "powder- coated" aluminum clad wood windows with muntins and will be red in color. The windows on the front elevation will be a combination of arched and square shaped. All the windows on the sides and rear will be square shaped. The fiberglass covered metal garage doors will be "mahogany.red" in color to match the windows. Wrought iron fencing black in color will be used for the ramp providing "accessible" access to the bedroom adjacent to the garage. A pre -cast stone balustrade will be constructed on the right side of the front elevation adjacent to the library. Copper standing seam roofs will be used for the front elevation bay window in the library and the rear elevation bay window in the family room/kitchen. Three "barrel style" dormers will provide natural light to the hallway and will also have copper standing seams roofs. The roof will have exposed wood ratters and the roofing materials will be composed of clay roof tiles with an "old mission blend" color blend. The applicant has submitted a roof tile color sample of the "old mission" color blend. This is a roof material with three colors of tile. These colors are orange, brown, and red. It is staffs experience that orange and red tiles can give off a bright appearance with an orange glow when exposed to sunlight. To reduce this effect, staff suggested to the applicant the use of a roof tile of a more neutral color palette with brown colored tiles. The applicant likes the appearance of the "old mission" color blend and prefers not to change it. Staff added a condition of project approval that the applicant will submit a revised roof tile . color sample to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director which includes tile with a neutral color prior to building permit issuance. 5 Application No. PDR07- 0018118853 Allendale Avenue Trees There are two protected trees on the site potentially impacted by the project. These include one 16 -inch flowering plum located in the rear yard of the existing house and one 20 -inch coast live oak also located in the rear yard and next to the fence the property shares with the rear neighbor. The flowering plum is in conflict with the proposed house and the arborist determined the tree to be dead and has approved its removal. The coast live oak could be impacted by the construction of the pool and related mechanical equipment. The arborist has determined tree fencing can adequately protect the oak during construction. This fencing is to be installed prior to, issuance of a building permit and this has been made a condition of project approval. A tree protection bond of $5,500 is required. Geotechnical Clearance The City's Geotechnical Consultant has peer reviewed the October 6, .2007 Geologic Investigation prepared by Wayne Ting & Associates, Inc. On January 3, 2008 the project was issued geotechnical clearance to proceed. Energy Efficiency As stated in the applicant's letter (Attachment #3), the project includes energy efficient and sustainable building techniques and materials to reduce the projects consumption of energy and water. These include "Energy Star Rated" clay roof tiles which qualify as a "cool roof' material: Cool roofs, can reduce building heat -gain, decrease the need for air conditioning, and increase the life -cycle of the roof. Other energy efficient measures include low -E (low - emissivity) double -paned windows, dormers to provide natural interior light, and Energy Star rated appliances. Water usage will be reduced by the use of high.efficiency fixtures. The landscape plan includes drought resistant and native plants which require less water. The gradirig plan is designed to keep the majority of water on site by directing the downspouts and runoff from hardscape to both the lawn and landscaped areas. Neighbor Correspondence The applicant has shown the proposed plans to neighbors as indicated in the attached letters (Attachment 7). Their comments are addressed below: The neighbor at 13791 Serra Oaks Court is concerned about the. existence and dimensions of a sound barrier for the proposed pool mechanical equipment. The landscape plan indicates the pool equipment would be located in the northeast corner of the yard and 12' -6" away from the rear property line. Pools and associated mechanical equipment are permitted to be located within a required rear yard setback. The plans do not include the design or dimensions of an enclosure for the pool equipment. A. condition of approval has been added requiring plans submitted for.building permit to include a design for any proposed pool equipment enclosure and that the noise emitted from the mechanical equipment not be in excess of the City's Noise Ordinance. • on • Application No. PDR07- 0018118853 Allendale Avenue • The neighbor at 13309 Serra Oaks Court is concerned the project could have "solar shading" effects. The project is an approximately '21 feet tall one -story home with a rear setback of approximately 75 feet. It is not anticipated the project would have an effect on this neighbor nor other adjacent neighbor's solar opportunities. • The neighbor at 18880 Allendale Avenue is concerned about early morning construction noise occurring before 8:00 A.M. Saratoga Municipal Code Section 7- 30.060 limits construction to the daytime hours between 7:30 am to 6:00 pm Monday through Friday, and 9:00 am to S: 00 pm on Saturday. Construction is not allowed on Sundays or holidays. No other comments have been received at the time of the preparation of this Staff Report. General Plan Findings The proposed project is consistent with the. following General Plan Policies: Conservation Element Policy 6.0 - Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. The house is a single -story residence and setback 47 feet from the street with architectural articulation to break up the mass in an attempt to reduce the projects visual impact and protect the existing rural atmosphere of the area. Building materials would include natural materials such as clay tile roofing and genuine stone trim. The extensive use of front yard landscaping will be compatible with landscaping on adjacent lots. Land Use Element Goal 13 -The City shall use the design review process to assyre Qew construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the findings required for Design Approval. The project is well designed and not visually massive. The architectural details and features and the use of natural materials compliment the Mediterranean Revival style. The footprint of the building will be constructed on an existing graded area thereby reducing the need for additional grading. The height of the project will be lower in height than the two -story homes located to the left and will not overwhelm the single -story home to the right or other single -story homes in the neighborhood. The design of the project will not adversely impact the privacy of the adjacent neighbors. Land Use Element Policy 5.0 —The City shall use the design review process and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in the review of proposed residential and non- residential to promote high quality design, to ensure compliance with applicable regulations, to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties and uses, and to minimize environmental impacts. The project is exempt from CEQA review. As conditioned, the application meets the following Findings required for Design Approval. 7 Application No. PDR07- 0018118853 Allendale Avenue Design Review Findings The proposed project is .consistent with all the following Design Review findings stated in Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15- 45.080: (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the proposed home is a single - story, design and will not unreasonably interfere with neighboring views or privacy. To further enhance privacy, the landscape plan features many proposed trees and hedges to be planted along the projects shared property fines. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the site contains two protected trees, a flowering plum and a coast live oak. The flowering plum is located within the proposed building footprint. This tree has been determined by the City Arborist to be dead and can be removed. The coast live oak located near the rear property line will be preserved and protected during construction. Other non - ordinance sized fruit and ornamental trees located along the perimeter of the rear yard are to. be preserved. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. This finding maybe made in the affirmative in that one existing native tree, a coast live oak, will be preserved and protected. There are no heritage trees located on site. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulb This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the project is a single -story residence with exterior building materials of both stucco and natural stone. A neutral tan color will be used for the stucco. To further reduce the perception of bulk the proposed project would be set back 47' from the street, will be well articulated and detailed and will include varying rooflines and projecting architectural elements. (e) .Compatible bulk and.heighz This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the projects height, varying rooflines, architectural detailing, and mix of exterior materials would minimize the visual perception of bulk. The project will be shorter than the two stories located to the left and would be compatible in height to other single -story homes in the neighborhood. 0) Current grading and erosion control methods. This finding may be made in the affirmative in. that the applicant has submitted a grading and drainage plan which maintains the majority of downspout and surface water runoff on site, the project incorporates appropriate grading and erosion control methods; and the project shall conform to the City's current grading and erosion control standards. (g) Design policies and techniques. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views. H., • Application No. PDR07- 0018118853 Allendale Avenue Conclusion Staff finds that all of the Design Review findings can be made in the affirmative and the proposal is consistent with the General Plan. Staff Recommendation Staffs recommends the Planning Commission find this Application exempt from CEQA and approve the application for Design Review with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. Attachments: 1. Resolution of Approval for Design Review 2. Project Description Letter (prepared by applicant). 3. List of projects sustainable building techniques (prepared by applicant) 4. Projects conformance with the Residential Design Handbook (prepared by applicant) 5. Design Review Findings (prepared by applicant). 6. City Arborist Report, dated, 12/17/07. 7. Neighbor review letters. 8. Affidavit of mailing notices, public hearing notice, and copy.of mailing labels for project notification, newspaper public hearing notice. 9. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A." Attachment...I. • • RESOLUTION NO. Application No. PDR07 -0018 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Wuu & Lee; 18853 Allendale Avenue APN 389 -30 -015 WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review to construct a single- story, approximately 21 -feet tall, single - family residence on a .92 acre lot in the R -1- 40,000 zone district; and WHEREAS, Zoning Code Section 15- 45.060 states any new single -story structure over 18 feet in height or whenever, as a result of proposed construction, reconstruction or expansion, the gross floor area of all structures on a site will exceed 6,000 square -feet, Design Review approval is required by the Planning Commission. The proposal consists of a new single -story structure taller than 18 feet and exceeds 6,000 square -feet; therefore, Planning Commission review is required; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and — - - - WHEREAS, The proposal is.--Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality ___ Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction or conversion of up to three single - family residences in an urbanized area and; WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Design Review, and is consistent with the following General Plan Policies: Conservation Element Policy 6.0 - Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. The house is single story and setback 47" from the street with architectural articulation to break up the mass in an attempt to reduce the projects visual impact and protect the existing rural atmosphere of the area. Building materials include natural materials such as clay tile roofing and genuine stone trim. The extensive use of front and rear yard landscaping will be compatible with landscaping on. adjacent lots. Land Use Element Goal 13 -The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the findings required for Design • Approval. The project is well designed and is not visually massive. The architectural details and features and the use of natural materials compliment the Mediterranean Revival style. The footprint of the building will be constructed on an existing graded area thereby Application No. PDR07- 0018/18853 Allendale Avenue reducing the need for additional grading. The height of the project will be lower in height than the two two -story homes located to the left and will not overwhelm the single -story home to the right or other single story homes in the neighborhood. The design of the project will not adversely impact the privacy of the adjacent neighbors. Land Use Element Policy 5.0 —The City shall use the design review process and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in, the review of proposed residential and non- residential to promote high quality design, to ensure compliance with applicable regulations, to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties and uses, and to minimize environmental impacts. The project is exempt from CEQA review. As conditioned, the application meets, the following Findings required for Design Approval. WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for Design Review approval, and the following findings have been determined: (a) Avoid .unreasonable interference with views and privacy. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the proposed home is a single -story design and will not unreasonably interfere with neighboring views or privacy. To further enhance privacy, the landscape plan features many proposed trees and hedges to be planted along the projects sharedproperty lines. (b) Preserve. Natural Landscape. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the site contains two protected trees, a flowering plum and a coast live oak. The flowering plum is located within the proposed building footprint. This tree has been determined by the City_Arborist to be dead and can be removed. The coast live oak located near the rear property line will be preserved and protected during construction. Other non - ordinance sized fruit and ornamental trees located along the perimeter of the rear yard are to be preserved. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. - This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the one existing native tree, a coast live oak, will be preserved and protected. There are no heritage trees located on site. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the project is a single -story residence with exterior building materials of both stucco and natural stone. A neutral tan color will 'be used for the stucco. To further reduce the perception of bulk the proposed project would be set back 47' from the street, will be well articulated and detailed and will include varying rooflines and projecting. architectural elements. (e) Compatible bulk and height. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the projects height, varying rooflines, architectural detailing, and mix of exterior materials would minimize the visual perception of bulk. The project will be shorter than the two stories located to the left and would be compatible in height to other single story homes in the neighborhood. 2 Application No. PDR07- 0018118853 Allendale Avenue • (f) Current grading and erosion control methods. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the applicant has submitted a grading and drainage plan which maintains the majority of downspout and surface water runoff on site, the project incorporates appropriate grading and erosion control methods; and the project shall conform to the City's current grading and erosion control standards. (g) Design policies and techniques. This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in terms of compatible bulk, and avoiding unreasonable interference with privacy and views. Now, THE"FORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, the application for Design Review approval is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: PERMANENT CONDITONS OF APPROVAL — None CURRENT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL CONDITIONS — 40 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT all be located and constructed_ as shown on Exhibit "A" date stamped March 6, 2008, incorporated by reference. All changes to the approved plans must be submitted in writing with plans showing the changes and are subject to the Community Development Director's approval. 2. The project shall utilize materials illustrated on a materials board dated March 6, 2008. 3. The following shall be required and/or included as to the plans submitted to the Building . Division for the building plan check review process: a. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans incorporating this Resolution as a separate plan page. b. The following note shall be included: "A maximum of one wood - burning fireplace is permitted and it shall be equipped with a gas starter. All other fireplaces shall be gas burning." C. The following note shall be included verifying building setback: "Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the Licensed Land Surveyor of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per approved plans." 4. A storm water retention plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval indicating how all storm water will be retained on -site, and incorporating the New Development and Construction - Best Management Practices. If all storm water cannot 3 Application No. PDR07- 0018118853 Allendale Avenue be retained on -site due to topographic, soils or other constraints, an explanatory note shall be provided on the plan. • 5. Landscape plan shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff, promote surface infiltration and minimize use of fertilizers and pesticides that. can contribute to water pollution. 6. To the extent feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, .detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. 7. To the extent feasible, pest resistant landscaping plants shall be used throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape areas. 8. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. 9. Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover, if applicable, shall be, retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. 10. Staff shall. not approve downgrading to the exterior appearance of the approved _ residence. Downgrades may include, but are not limited to, garage doors, architectural detailing, stonework, columns, shutters, driveway materials, —or- similar- items.-- - Any- - --- - - - -- -- exterior changes- to approved plans resulting in a downgrade shall require filing an additional application and fees for review by the Planning Commission as a modification to approved plans. Any other exterior changes to the approved plans, which are not deemed a downgrade by staff, shall require a Zoning Clearance issued by the Community Development Director with payment of appropriate fees. 11. All processing fees; in the form of deposit accounts on file with the community development department, shall be reconciled with a minimum $500.00 surplus balance at all times.. In the event that the balance is less than $500.00, all staff work on the project shall cease until. the balance is restored to a minimum $500.00. 12. Front yard landscaping shall be installed prior to final occupancy inspection. 13. Prior to-building permit issuance the project applicant shall submit for approval to the Satisfaction of the Community Development Director a roof tile color sample that includes tile with a neutral color. 14. Construction details of the pool equipment enclosure shall be included. in the plans submitted for building permit. Prior to building permit final the applicant shall provide a letter to the Community Development Department certifying that the equipment conforms to. the City's Noise Ordinance. 11 Application No. PDR07- 0018/18853 Allendale Avenue 15. Plans submitted for building permit shall show the location of all heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment (HVAC). No HVAC mechanical equipment shall be located within any required front, side, or rear setback (SMC Section 15- 80.030(1). CITY ARBORIST 16. All recommendations contained in the City Arborist Report dated December 17, 2007, shall be followed. 17. Tree protective measures, as specified by the City Arborist, shall be installed and inspected by Staff prior to issuance of City Permits. 18. Prior to issuance of City Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City, in a fprm acceptable to the Community Development Director, security equivalent to $5,500 to guarantee the maintenance and preservation of trees. 19. The City Arborist shall inspect the site to verify compliance with tree protective measures. The bond shall be released after the planting of required replacement trees, a favorable site inspection by the City Arborist, and payment of any outstanding Arborist fees FIRE DISTRICT 20. Applicant shall comply with all Santa Clara County Fire Department conditions. PUBLIC WORKS 21. The Project Geotechnical Consultant shall review and approve all geotechnical aspects of the final development plans (i.e., site preparation and grading, site drainage improvements and design parameters for foundations) to ensure that the plans, specifications and details accurately reflect the consultants' recommendations. The results of the plan review shall be summarized by the Project Geotechnical Consultant in a letter and submitted to the City Engineer for review prior to issuance of permits for project construction. 22. The Project Geotechnical Engineer shall inspect, test (as needed), and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project construction. The inspections shall include, but not necessarily be limited to: site preparation and grading, site surface and subsurface drainage improvements, retaining wall excavation, and foundation construction, prior to placement of fill, steel and concrete. The results of these inspections and the as -built conditions of the project shall be described by the Project Geotechnical Engineer in a letter(s) and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to Final (as- built) Project Approval. 23. The owner (applicant) shall pay any outstanding fees associated with the City Geotechnical Consultant's review of the project prior to Zone Clearance. 5 Application No. PDR07- 0018/18853 Allendale Avenue 24. The owner (applicant) shall enter into agreement holding the City of Saratoga harmless from any claims or liabilities caused by or arising out of soil or slope instability, slides, slope failure or other soil related and/or erosion related conditions. CITY ATTORNEY 25. Owner and Applicant agree to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with - City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. Section 2. A Building Permit must be issued and construction commenced within 36 months from the date of adoption of this Resolution or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15 -90 of the. Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, on this 26th day of March 2008 by the following roll call vote: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Joyce Hlava Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: John F. Livingstone, AICP Secretary, Planning Commission on • 1 • • Application No. PDR07- 0018/18853 Allendale Avenue This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date • t7 7 147 Castro Street, Suite 2 Mountain View, CA 94041 March 12, 2008 Planning Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 RE: Application No. PDR07 -0018 /Design Review Application -18853 Allendale Avenue (APN 389- 30 -015): Response to Planning comments, item #6, Project Description The predominant architectural style of the proposed residence is modem Mediterranean Revival, common to California and the Santa Clara Valley. In keeping with the style, the exterior of the house features stuccoed wall surfaces, asymmetrical massing, and terra cotta Spanish roof tiles. The library in the front of the house has a prominent rotunda that adds character and visual interest and breaks up the strict rectilinear forms of the rest of the house. Arches emphasize the main entrance and windows along the front of the house; the front door and windows are further enhanced with columns and have decorative stone trims. The rear courtyard walls are punctuated by stained glass clerestory windows. Natural stone veneer wraps around the base of the house, and slate tiles accent the windows on the garage. _To-help- integrate- the - house- with_ the - neighborhood-and _natural_ environment ,_the_house._- __.________ is single -story and sited well- within the required setbacks for the lot. Limiting the house to one story and carefully considering the location, height, and number of windows provide maximum privacy for the both the owners and the surrounding neighbors. The stucco wall finish will be painted in warm, subtle, and inviting hues that are coordinated with the landscaping and echo the other residences in the neighborhood. The landscaping reflects the home's Mediterranean influences, while also making use of native vegetation. The existing native oak tree on the property is a protected tree and is being preserved in accordance with the regulations in the City Codes. The landscape design has a lot of open green lawn space integrated with small pockets of patio areas. The major landscape features are as follows: there is a small L- shaped trellis area to provide some relief from the sun in the rear, as well as a small built -in BBQ unit. In addition, there shall be a pool/spa area. The planting palette shall be more drought - tolerant, maintenance-free, and native. More native planting shall be used to blend with the surrounding character of the existing neighborhood. The patio, walkway, and driveway colors shall be more earth -tone hues to blend in with the surrounding neighborhood. • 147 Castro Street, Suite 2 Mountain View, CA 94041 January 29, 2008 Planning Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 RE: Application No. PDR07 -0018 /Design Review Application -18853 Allendale Avenue (APN 389 -30 -015): Response to Planning comments, item #19, Sustainable building techniques There are a number of "green° /sustainable techniques and materials that can and will be utilized to reduce the energy and water needs of the proposed home. To improve energy efficiency, the house will use clay roof tiles by MCA that are Energy Star -rated and qualify as a "cool roof" material. The tiles meet or exceed "California's Title 24 Cool Roof standard of 40 %. solar reflectance and thermal emittance requirement" (MCA.) The tiles will help reduce solar heat gain in the summer and heat loss in the winter, thus decreasing the heating and cooling needs of the house. Additionally, the house will use low -E (low- emissivity), double -paned windows that restrict passage of radiant heat through the glass, further reducing the heating and cooling loads of the house. Careful installation of insulation and weather - stripping and Energy Star -rated appliances will also contribute to an energy- efficient structure. To make the home water efficient, high or very high efficiency water fixtures (toilets, showers, faucets) will be installed. The landscaping plan includes drought- resistant and dative plants that require less water. Best construction practices will use materials efficiently and reduce construction waste. • l • 147 Castro Street, Suite 2 Mountain View, CA 94041 January 29, 2008 Planning Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 RE: Application No. PDR07- 0018 /Design Review Application -18853 Allendale Avenue (APN 389 -30 -015): Response.to Planning comments, item #20, Conformance with City of Saratoga Residential Design Guidebook Policy 1: Minimize Perception of Bulk • Techniques #1 and 2: Not applicable. The house is on a flat lot. Technique #3: The house is designed to reduce visual bulk. Materials are stucco and stone veneer with a limited, natural color palette. The house emphasized the horizontal plane with stone veneer at along the base of the house as well as decorative stucco trim /molding around the lower portion of the house on all elevations. • Technique #4: The house is below the maximum building height of 26'. The ridgeline —along -the- length -of -the- house- is - #he- highest- point_of_ the - building ._P_er_the_city's_r_equest, — — _ —_ the height of the entry has been reduced to the height of the ridgeline. The rooflines are varied, with taller portions set back to break up the massing of the house. Technique #5: The height of the entry has been reduced to better fit in with the neighborhood. The siting and proportions of the structure are in -line with the other residences in the area. • Technique #6: The proposed residence has many features intended to prevent massing and monotonous planes. As mentioned, the rooflines are varied in height and shape. The house also features a number of windows, including bow and dormer windows that punctuate expanses of wall and roof. The use of columns at the entrance and garage help add visual interest. Policy 2: Integrate Structures with Environment • Technique #1: The exterior finishes of the house have been chosen to integrate the building with its surroundings. The palette is neutral, with the use of natural hues and materials that compliment the neighborhood and are coordinated with the landscaping. The stone veneers compliment the paint. The roofing material is a terra cotta - colored • Spanish the roof with a variegated pattern. •. Technique #2: The proposed single -story house is on ,a large, flat lot, surrounded predominantly by other single -story residences. • Technique #3: The native oak tree on the site is being preserved. The existing conditions are sparse. The proposed landscaping will use native vegetation when and where possible and is designed to enhance the site-and the-house. • Technique #4: Not applicable. • Technique #5: Refer to previous descriptions of the exterior finishes and rooflines. • Technique #6: The existing fences on the side and rear of the property are to remain. The proposed fencing in the front of the property is a low masonry wall with wrought- iron, which will reduce the appearance of bulk. Policy 3: Residential Privacy • Technique #1: Not applicable. • Technique #2: The house is located generously within the required setbacks. The windows, particularly on the east and west elevations, are placed to maximize privacy. Technique #3: The landscaping is integrated with the design and siting of the house and uses a variety of evergreen and deciduous trees to provide privacy and screening for - both-the- homeowners- and - contiguous - neighbors.-- T - -he- palette -of -the- trees- and - plants -= -- - compliment and blend in with the surrounding neighborhood's existing vegetation., Technique #4: The house is located well- within the required setbacks to mini&ze poise transmission. • Technique #5: The planned exterior light sources of the house are limited and directed towards the ground to control the spread of light. Additionally, the trees along the perimeter of the property shield light from the neighbors. Policy 4: Preservation of Views Not applicable because the house is not on a hillside lot. Policy 5: Design for Energy Efficiency • Technique #1: The long axis of the house runs from east to west, with the front of the house facing south and the rear, respectively, facing north. There are few windows and openings on the east and west elevations, and most windows are operable to allow. for cross ventilation. Additionally, consideration will be given to choose materials, products, appliances, and construction practices that help reduce the environmental impact of the home, with particular focus on energy consumption and the lifespan of the structure. The roof tiles are Energy Star rated and qualify as a cool roof material, reducing heat gain by reflecting solar energy back from the roof. This reduces the cooling and ventilation needs for the house. The house will have double - paned, insulated low -E windows to reduce solar gain in the warm months. Proper and thorough insulation and weather- stripping will further reduce solar gain /heat loss, reducing the energy needs of the house. • Technique #2: Refer to landscaping plans for information on tree species and locations. • Technique #3: The size of the lot and the siting of the house allow unrestricted light, air and solar access to adjacent homes. • KI Attachm • 147 Castro Street, Suite 2 Mountain View, CA 94041 January 29, 2008 Planning Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 RE: Application No. PDR07 -0018 /Design Review Application -18853 Allendale Avenue (APN 389- 30 -015): Response to Planning comments, item #3, Design Review Findings Summary This summary details the project's compliance with the Design. Review Findings, Article 15-45 -080, of the Saratoga Municipal Code. a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The proposed house has several measures and design features that address privacy and views. The structure is a. single -story dwelling sited well within the required property setbacks, limiting the extent to which the owners and neighbors can see each other's properties. Consideration of privacy was also given when locating windows in the home; the private areas of the house within the line of site of the neighborhood have clerestory windows. The — landscaping- plan- includes the - preservation-- of- -existing _trees_and -planting of_new trees_ around the perimeter of the back yard to offer additional privacy and mitigate noise. b) Preserve natural landscape. The property is a large, level lot with minimal itiat4al contours. As such, changes in grade and related impact to the neighborhood will be minimal. c) Preserve native and heritage trees. Pursuant to the City Arborist's report, the existing coast live oak in the rear of the property will be preserved. This is the only tree on the property in specific need of preservation. d) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. The proposed house has several features to minimize bulk and prevent visual monotony. The horizontal plane is emphasized, and the massing of the structure is varied. The stucco is to be painted in warm, neutral tones to harmonize with the neighborhood and natural surroundings. For additional description, please refer to. the attached response to the conformance with the Residential Design Guidebook. e) Compatible bulk and height. Per the Planning Department response on December 10, item #1, the height of the entrance has been lowered to better conform to the scale, composition, and character of the house and to the neighborhood. Because the house is single -story and sited away from other homes, it does not interfere with the surrounding homes' access to sunlight or fresh air. f) Current grading and erosion control methods. The grading plan incorporates current oradino and erosion control standards used by the Citv. as described in the storm water control plan. "Start at the source" for residential sites is used, and better Management Practices are also incorporated into the design. g) Design policies and techniques. Refer to attached response to the conformance with the Residential Design Guidebook. I �, Attachment 6 I0 Incap=wd0cd)er2'). 1956 13777 FRUITNIALE AVENUE SARATOGA, CALIFOR? December 17, 2007 Mr. and Mrs. Yueh-Ying Lee 18M Allendale Avenue Saratoga, CA 9.5070 q1A 95 070 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Jill Hunter Aileen Kao Kathleen King Chuck Page Ann Waltonsmith Dear Mr. and Mrs. Lee, RE: permit application #ARB07-0044 Enclosed is my report upon initial inspection of the trees on your property. Please provide this report to your architect so it can. be included in the final plans. Prior to obtaining a permit from the Planning —Depar—tment,-I-Willneed to inspect tree protective — fencing. Also, a tree protection bond should be obtained and the form (attached) submitted at the time you submit for planning approval. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (408) 868-1276. Sincerely, Kate Bear City Arborist • • Community Development Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, Cafrfomia 95070 18853 Allendale Ave. ARBORIST REPORT APN 389 -30 -015 Owner: Shiuh -Wuu & Yueh -Ying H. Lee INTRODUCTION E Application #: ARB07 -0044 December 17, 2007 Prepared by Kate Bear, City Arborist Phone (408) 868 -1276 The property owner. of 18853 Allendale Avenue has submitted plans to the city to demolish the existing house and build a new single family house on the property. Two trees protected by City ordinance and potentially impacted by construction were inventoried for this report. Data for each tree is included in a Tree Inventory Table at the end of this report. Tree locations are marked on the attached copy of the Site Plan. Plans reviewed for this report include Sheet 1, Cover Sheet; Sheet A1.0, Site Plan; Sheet 1.2, Floor Plan; Sheet 4.0, Elevations; and Sheet 5.0, Sections, dated November 19, 2007 and prepared by Studio 02. Also reviewed were Sheet 1, Grading and Drainage by RW Engineering, dated November 2, 2007 and Sheet L- 1, Landscape Concept Plan dated November 14, 2007 by Ron Cheung, Registered Landscape Architect. SITE OBSERVATIONS, PLAN REVIEW AND TECHNICAL DISCUSSION Two trees are potentially impacted by construction. They include one flowering plum ( #1) and onecoast live oak ( #2). The flowering plum is in conflict with the project and is dead and should be removed. The coast live oak can be adequately protected with fencing during construction. Tree #1 should be shown to be removed on the final building plans and both trees should be numbered on the site plan in the final building plan set. Any necessary trenching for installation of irrigation and pool equipment should remain outside of the canopy of oak tree #2 and its protective fencing. Per City Ordinance 15- 50.080, a bond in the $5,500, which is equal to 100% of the total appraised value of tree #2, is required. Appraisal values are calculated according to the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9' h Edition, published by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), 2000 in conjunction with the Species Classification and Group Assignment book, published by the Western Chapter of the International Society of Arboriculture (2004). RECOMMENDATIONS 1. This entire report, including the Tree Inventory Table and map showing locations of trees and protective fencing, shall be incorporated into the set of final building plans. Page 1 of 2 18853 Allendale Avenue 2. Tree protective fencing shall be installed as shown on the attached map and established prior to ction equipment or materials on site. It shall be comprised of any grading or the arrival of constru six -foot high chain link fencing mounted on eight -foot tall, two -inch diameter galvanized posts, driven 24 inches into.the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet apart. Once established, the, fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process' until final inspection. Tree protective fencing shall be inspected and approved by the City Arborist prior to obtaining building division permits. 3. Owner shall provide a tree protection bond in the amount of $5,500 prior to obtaining building division permits. The bond shall remain in place for the duration of the construction project to ensure the protection of the trees. Once the project has been completed and inspected by the City Arborist, the bond can be released. 4. No grading or trenching shall occur under the canopy of oak tree #2. All irrigation and.plumbing for pool equipment shall remain outside of the fenced area around this tree. 5. Any pruning of trees on site must be performed under the supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. 6. Grade changes are not pennitted within 15 feet of tree #2. 7. The disposal of harmful products, including but not limited to chemicals, paint rinse water, fuel, cement rinse water, herbicides, or other materials, is prohibited beneath tree canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath tree canopies. • Page 2 of 2. TREE INVENTORY TABLE Total Appraised Value • $5,500 Replacement Tree Values 15 gallon = $150 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 48 inch box = $5,000 52 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 Should an y tree listed above become damaged owner will be required to repair the damage. Should any tree listed above be removed - owner -will- be-required- to-replace- that -tr-ee- with - trees— -- -- equal in value to its assessed value. , 18853 Allendale Ave December 17, 2007 Almond 7.3, 1 Prunus am dalus 9 0 0 0 Dead Remove 0 X $0 Coast Live Oak 2 Ouercus a ri olia 20 30 80 40 Good High 5 $5,500 Total Appraised Value • $5,500 Replacement Tree Values 15 gallon = $150 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 48 inch box = $5,000 52 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 Should an y tree listed above become damaged owner will be required to repair the damage. Should any tree listed above be removed - owner -will- be-required- to-replace- that -tr-ee- with - trees— -- -- equal in value to its assessed value. , 18853 Allendale Ave December 17, 2007 City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: /a'� e` ✓ °� Li'qyd °� Dear Neighbor, p E.0 E VV E 0 -; NOV ? 1 2001 CITY QE SARATOGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to- review the proposal. and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and maybe changed as the project moves forward. You maY contact the City of Saratoga ',s Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: �� unl (�1 t �, � p n S m �` f/l� — --Date: o -' 2- 10 7 - - -- Signature: L% Neighbor Address: 13 Nil fit-a L Lt 70 Neighbor Phone #: d �O 3706 - - If have any initial concerns with the project may- list them-below: My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): f YK 6Q 1A 31 Applicant Name: g -e I'liel be E- Date: Application Number: City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form Fri, PROJECT ADDRESS: / V -4 1 1 1; V Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to :.a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City ofSaratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. -The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised. that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have ftu-ther interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408-868-1222 ands with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I. am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Names, Date: — ! " 4 % Signature: L-2 c fl% -u: f Lt Neighbor Address: -0 Neighbor Phone #; 1f I have any initial concerns-with M s -with the project I may-list them below.- My concerns are the - following (please attach additional sheets. if necessary): 'Y' 4, L Applicant Name: L/h /'a/) Date: Application Number: City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 GA E)EHVELOPIVENT 1 • • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form ;r r PROJECT ADDRESS: /ciL%i 3 �..l�YN %f % 1:" ., �l:tr� _ `� "f' ii �(� " Lu i I Dear Neighbor, ;T,r _ 4,,_R"M ' 101N M ! 5 TY DEVELOPMENT I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity--to review -the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on -the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and maybe changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408- 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: —I-Z C.Ki Q Date: E Signature: _ Neighbor Address: _ Neighbor Phone #: 11, 2 X70 -- Ifi have any initial concerns i =,':tr the project I :nay list them below.- My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: L� Date:_ !/ Z� 4 Application Number: City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 City of Saratoga ='! I ( i Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: - . DirIMi 114 1 T ' DEVE w ^PMENT Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity -to - review the- proposal and -provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a- decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and maybe changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time,to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga _at 408 - 868 -1222 and. speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed. project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name:�"h�•✓\�� Date: Signature: Neighbor Address: / g &IL) A! (,�,A Ict (t AVe C- clr(1 ;'U Neighbor Phone #: IfI have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. -My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Date: Name: S iuN Application Number: City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 • City of Saratoga �; ±; L'- J Neighbor Notification Form Nov PROJECT ADDRESS: /� air JP•tl Y . CVELli PMEN i Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an-- opportunity -to review- the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to _ _ ....,._ a decision being made on the project. -,: • I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 -868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: Neighbor Address: 1870 &Ia/�P� � Neighbor Phone #: 409 96 7744976 If I have any initial-concerns with the project I may -list them - below: My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Ald, .4 Aur-Z&-lk r'. T' /i Ic Air y 0� i 1�w2 Applicant Name: E �'` ` / 1 b�1 Le Er Date: Application Number: . City of Saraioga Revised 70/24/06 Planning Department • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form 0 PROJECT ADDRESS: 188.5` J , /11,,"61,, 4 live. sa %'.C:47a� f' 7 Dear Neighbor, ��� �-p 75�� NOV 1,c1 LUP. CITY Cc SARATOGA C'O MUN1 I Y iE1 /E! OPhJEP'a T I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with 'an -- opportunity- -to- review - -the proposal -and - provide comments. All-of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being-made-on -the project. n..:._._.......,_- _...... -- •.---- ......_... , I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may, contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408- 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: - ` — -- - -Date: Signature:. � Neighbor Address: e-t- ,►�,fv G 70 wog -8�-7 -04f% Neighbor Phone #. If I have any-initial "-concerns with the project I may list them below. My -concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: ,�ill &// Q �v Date: Y4, rL Y Application Number: City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 • • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: f $35-3 �! %t�� lF Ave.. Saraffa� es4 [: _ V Z ;j I Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with -an- opportunity -to- review -the proposal -- and - provide -- comments. - - - -- All - -of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to __a decision-being made on the project. �.w_ ....__..._..._ I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and maybe changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary pr9ect plans. Neighbor Date: // /iL- IC Signature: Neighbor Address: Neighbor Phone #: 55�, .7 - / 7 ,Y/ If -1 have any-initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: LShiul] - 4ic: w /- e Date: i i /3 e- Application Number: City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 Planning Department City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: Dear Neighbor, I C! OF�4R;,,TOOA , 0MU. -UNITY Gc " " ' VE! vPi ✓EN7 I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with -an- opportunity -.-to- review- the. - proposal and - provide - comments. AlL of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to adecision being - made- on.theproject: I ask that you familiarize yourself with the. preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City . of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please. be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga .at 408- 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: Li C1 F_ �, ►`)) Date: - -- k Signature: o l>7 ✓ c -(_ Neighbor Address: Address: j3�bo N9�hfeGc. 6Ja� ,. V C \YChfn 4i .. C A 9 rG� o Neighbor Phone #: d� • '� tit . Lrlp/ 2 If I have-any initial concerns with the project i may list them below. My concerns are the -' following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): C} Applicant Name: cJ�i� +' ?' �l:`La4 �r Date: a.,d Application Number: City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 0 City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: K3's�? 111e41616tl ri AVe. SAr 'fit! t � ; J,. N0 V ( 11101 Dear Neighbor, -1 SA,, AATCG,�, l:'Ji:�l�!.i''J1 i �i U :�L �.'J `iv'�G!'i I I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with —an- opportunity - -to -- review- -the- proposal - and --provide comments.. All-of-the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to .... ....... :._.a.decision being made on the project. ._,�.: ,._.,.,_,_..__. - ..._.....�:....... ....._ 1 ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further, interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408- 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Signature: rft-- -J "T O lY.c��s1 Neighbor Address: t U Ufs t A Neighbor Phone M 140 ,t— .2 z - If -I have any initial concerns with the project I may list -them below. My concerns are the - following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): 5G1 ►�� �� - G�v�ts� '�r- Applicant Name: Date: ////X,/ C / Application Number.: City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 Planning Department Attachment 8 CITY OF SARATOGA Community Development Department • 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 (408) 868 -1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City_of Sarato a's Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on: Wednesday, the 26 day of March 2008, at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Theater located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. The public hearing agenda item is stated below. Details of this item are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. 5:00 p.m. Please consult the City website at www.saratoga.ca.us regarding Friday office closures. APPLICATION /ADDRESS: PDR07 -0018 / 18853 Allendale Avenue APPLICANT /OWNER: Studio 02 (Applicant) / Wuu & Lee (Owners) APN: 389 -30 -015 DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Design Review approval to remove an existing one story single - family residence and construct a new approximately 6,015 square feet one -story single family residence with a proposed height of approximately 21 feet. The net lot size is —approximately-. 92 acres. —T-he-site-is-zoned-R-1-40 000- (Single-F-amily- REsidentiak). Design Review approval by the Planning Commission is required pursuant to Saratoga Municipal. Code Section 15- 45.060. ' All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a Public Hearing in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing. In order for information to be included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed on or before Thursday, March 20, 2008. This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor's office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out -of -date information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all residents potentially affected by a project. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Christopher Alan Riordan, AICP Senior Planner (408) 868 -1235 larch 11, 2008 00' Ownership repared For: 89 -30 -015 HIUH -WUU & YUEH -YING LEE 3853 ALLENDALE AVE ARATOGA CA 95070 -5267 39 -28 -001 NTHONY & JANELL SCALORA R CURRENT OWNER 3807 ALLENDALE AVE kRATOGA CA 95070 -5238 389 -28 -002 JACK H & MAHA ZAROUR OR CURRENT OWNER 18825 ALLENDALE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -5238 389 -28 -003 MICHAEL W & DIANA GOBLE OR CURRENT OWNER 138J2 SERRA OAKS CT SARATOGA CA 95070 - 5254 39 -28 -004 389 -28 -005 389 -28 -006 AM NGUYEN STEPHANIE L MACAULEY INDERPAL S & SUSHIL NARANG R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 3794 SERRA OAKS CT 13786 SERRA OAKS. CT 13778 SERRA OAKS CT . kRATOGA CA 95070 -5254 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5254 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5254 39 -28 -007 389 -28 -008 389 -28 -009 IRGINIA KING LARRY L & MARIAN KRUMMEL CLEMENT & VIVIAN MILLS R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER.. OR CURRENT OWNER 3762 SERRA OAKS CT_ 13750 SERRA OAKS CT 13759 SERRA OAKS CT kRATOGA CA 95070 -5254 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5254 SARATOGA CA 95070 -525.4 39 -28 -010 389 -28 -011 389 -28 -012 iNAC- iO- J- &-C- ONC -EPC -ION- - - GURINDER- S- &- INDERJI- T- AULAKH = -SANG - -- DRRALES OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER R CURRENT OWNER' 13775 SERRA OAKS CT 13783 SERRA OAKS CT 5767 SERRA OAKS CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -5254 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5254 kR.ATOGA CA 95070, -5254 �9 -28 -013 389 -28 -014 389 -28 -0.15 EKE & ALICIA SMITH ALBERT A & DIANE DREWKE SAM T & CATHERINE PHOTOPOULOS R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT. OWNER +791 SERRA OAKS CT . 13809 SERRA OAKS CT 13774 FORTUNA CT kRATOGA CA 95070 -5254 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5254, SARATOGA CA 95070 -5242 :9 -28 -016 389 -28 -017 389 -28 -018 [CK L LIU JAMES A & LAURIE SHEA MICHAEL J & DIANE REED . . R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER -.740 FORTUNA CT 13736 FORTUNA CT 13728 FORTUNA CT kRATOGA CA 95070 -5242 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5242 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5242 9-28 -019 389 -28 -020 389- 28 -02-1 TDITH E & MARK GOLOD SHARON BARGHI HARLEN & BEATA NG CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 722 FORTUNA CT 13690 FORTUNA CT 18820 HARLEIGH DR kRATOGA CA 95070 -5242 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5242 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5247 9 -28 -022 389-28-023 389-28-024 VIMAL RAJDEV NDA C SMITH RICHARD & STEPHANIE PALMER DILIP & 2 CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 812 HARLEIGH DR 18806 HARLEIGH DR 18800 HARLEIGH DR �RATOGA CA 95070 -5247 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5247 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5247 89 -30 -015 ;HIUH -WUU & YUEH -YING LEE )R CURRENT OWNER 8"LLENDALE AVE OGA CA 95070 -5267 89 -30 -020 iNDY I CHEN )R CURRENT OWNER 8920 ALCOTT WAY ARATOGA CA 95070 -5231 89 -30 -023 [UNG -CHENG SUNG )R CURRENT OWNER 8860 ALCOTT WAY . ARATOGA CA 95070 -5231 389 -30 -017 WILSON OR CURRENT OWNER 18945 ALLENDALE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -5267 389-30-019 RON & GABRIELE MCINNIS OR CURRENT OWNER 18940 ALCOTT WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -5231 389 -30 -021 389 -30 -022 KEITH M & MARGARET FERGUSON JON & CYNTHIA KINSTING OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 18900 ALCOTT WAY 18880 ALCOTT WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -5231 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5231 389 -30 -024 FASA LLC 14648 ALOHA AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -6004 89 -30 -026 389 -30 -027 'ILLETTE H & DONALD GOTTWALS PAVLIDAKIS- RONALD IR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 3730 MANTECA WAY 13714 MANTECA WAY ARATOGA CA 95070 -5261 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5261 389 -30 -025 KOENIG OR CURRENT OWNER 137,46 MANTECA WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -5261 389 -30 -028 LEWIS A & CAROL OSOFSKY OR CURRENT OWNER 13698 MANTECA WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -5261 89 -30 -031 389 -30 -036 389 -30 -037 [ELEN E STAGNARO SRIKANTH NUGGEHALLI DONALD & RACHEL MCINTOSH ,R CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 3685 MANTECA WAY 18920 TWAIN CT 18910 TWAIN CT. A OGA CA 95070 -5252 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5255 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5255 . 389 -30 -039 389 -30 -040 PHIL- L-IP -L - &- BONNIE JORDAN - - ANTHONY- G- &- W-AREEN MATUK-AS- LYDE R & LILLIAN MOSIER OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER O BOX 3144 13745 MANTECA WAY 18911 ALCOT- f'\VAY , ARATOGA CA 95070 -1144 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5213 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5262 39 -30 -041 ETER & MARYBETH SMAILS ,R CURRENT OWNER 3929 ALCOTT WAY ARATOGA CA 95070 -5262 39 -30 -054 OUMAN KERCHGANI R CURRENT OWNER 3717 FORTUNA CT ARATOGA CA 95070 -5242 39 -30 -057 UNG & RONY FENG D BOX 2922 kRATOGA CA 95070 -0922 389 -30 -042 . JAGDEEP & SUNITA BAL OR CURRENT OWNER 18947 ALCOTT WAY SARATOGA CA 95070 -5262 389 -30 -055 JUSTIN M & FORD HEMANN OR CURRENT OWNER 13731 FORTUNA CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -5242 389 -30 -058 PAUL H & PATRICIA KELKER OR CURRENT OWNER 13783 FORTUNA CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -5242 60 397 -01 -006 B HAMID & OZRA ABDOLLAHI BELLICITTI R CURRENT OWNER 14001 CHESTER AVE ;883 ALLENDALE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -5619 %RATOGA CA 95070 -5267 389 -30 -053 LI C CHAO OR CURRENT OWNER 13695 FORTUNA CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -5242 389 -30 -056 BEVERLY G DUBA OR CURRENT OWNER 13745 FORTUNA CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -5242 389 -30 -059 ANNA & LASZLO SIPOS OR CURRENT OWNER 18873 ALLENDALE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -5267 397 -01- 012,014 ST ARCHANGEL MICHAEL 18870 ALLENDALE AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -5239 • 397 =01 -062 97 -01 -024 397 -01 -025 E A & SUZANNE MAAS ICHARD M & JOYCE BELDING DANIEL T & SUSANNA WONG OR CURRENT OWNER 70 DRAKE CT PO BOX 2953 13948 BARCO ANTA CLARA CA 95051 -6737 SARATOGA CA 95070 -0953 SARATOOGA GA CA 95070 -5661 . C 397 -01 -064 397 -02 -109 97 -01 -063 ROBERT E.& KARYN BARR CAROLYN R BUEHNER AY &SUE SABO OR CURRENT OWNER OR CURRENT OWNER 5 VILLAGE WAY 5V IL 13914 CAMINO BARCO 18650 ALLENDALE AVE CA 92603 -0217 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5661 SARATOGA CA 95070 -5277 ITY OF SARATOGA Advanced Listing Services TTN: Christopher Riordan p,0 Box 2593 3777 FRUITVALE AVENUE Dana Point CA 92624 ARATOGA CA 95070 • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, Denise Kaspar , being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the lid, day of March , 2008, that I deposited 62 Notices in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of Which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to -wit: (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of -- -Hearing pursuant to Section. - 1-5= 45:060(b) of -the Zoning- Ordinance -of- the - City -of -- Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most .recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property described as: APN: 389 -30 -015 Address: 18853 Allendale Avenue that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. f/ Denise Kaspar� Advanced Listing Services • Legal ve tisiogC5Nblidotices person or by your attorney. California Building, Fire, All interested persons may said Notice of Default and the initial publication of the fees, charges and expenses �,,, IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR or a Electrical, Mechanical and 'he Plumbing Codes and amend appear and be heard at the above time and If C..- . toe o (iruStee SaIeS Election to sell to be record- ed In the County where Notice of Sale is $677,069.01. It is possible of the Trustee for the total amount (at the time of the ✓i General Notices contingent creditor of deceased, you must file your them to reflect local condi- place. you challenge a decision of the the real property is located. that at the time of sale the .initial publication of the claim with the court and mail tions in the City of Saratoga. Planning Commission pur• Date: 3/1212008 opening bid may be less Notice of Sale) reasonably IOTICE OF PETITION TO a copy to the personal repre- The proposed ordinance suant to a public hearing in TSG NO.: 3538470 First American than the total indebtedness estimated to be set forth DMINISTER ESTATE OF sentative..appoinled_by_Ihe__ - would .:generally retain the court, you may be limited to TS NO.: 20079017102642 Title Insurance Company due. In addition to cash, the below. The amount may be )HN T. STEINBERG court within four months City's current regulations. It raising only those issues you FHA /VA /PMI NO.: First American Trustee will accept cashier's greater on the day of sale. ASE NO. 1-08-PR-162849 from the date of first would update some regula- or someone else raised at NOTICE Of TRUSTEE'S SALE LoanStar Trustee Services checks drawn on a state or BENEFICIARY MAY ELECT TO D all heirs, beneficiaries, issuance of letters as provid- lions, including those for the public hearing(s) YOU ARE IN DEFAULT 3 First American Way national bank, a check BID LESS THAN THE TOTAL reditors, contingent credi- ed in section 9100 of the earthquake safety and auto- described in this notice, or in UNDER A DEED OF TRUST, Santa Ana, CA 92707 drawn by a state or federal AMOUNT DUE. Trustor(s): )is, and persons who may California Probate Code. The matic fire sprinklers. written correspondence DATED 10/11/2006 UNLESS First American loanstar credit union, or a check PETER A. TANTRAPHOL AND therwise be interested in time for filing claims will not The ordinance would also "Excavation delivered to the Saratoga YOU TAKE ACTION TO PRO. Trustee Services may be act- drawn by a state or federal LISA M. SCHMIDT, HUSBAND ie will or estate, or both of expire before four months adopt an and Planning Commission at, ar TER YOUR PROPERTY, IT ing as a debt collector savings and loan associa- AND WIFE Recorded: )HN T. STEINBERG From the hearing date Grading" Code to ensure the prior to, the public hearing. MAY BE SOLD AT A PUBLIC attempting to collect a lion, savings association, or 7/2/1992 as instrument No. PETITION has been filed by noticed above. City retains its current exca- In order to be included in the SALE. IF YOU NEED AN debt. savings bank specified in 11433458 in book •, page - of ANCY ). BLANCHARD in the YOU MAY EXAMINE the file vation and grading provi- Planning Commission's infor- EXPLANATION OF THE Any information oblaided Section 5102 of the Financial Official Records in the office uperior Court of California, kept by the court. If you are sions. Finally, the proposed mation packets, written NATURE OF THE PROCEED• will be used for that put- Code and authorized to d4 of the Recorder of SANTA ounlyof Santa Clara. a person interested in the ordinance would adopt a "Repair communications should be ING AGAINST YOU, YOU pose. Original document business in this state. Said "A5 CLARA County. California; HE PETITION requests that estate, you may file with the and Reconstruction" filed on or before the SHOULD CONTACT A signed by Authorized Agent sale will be made, in an Date of Sale: 3/18/2008 at ANCY 1• BLANCHARD be court a formal Request for Code to ensure that dam- Tuesday, a week before the LAWYER. ChetSconyers - ForTrustee's IS" condition, but without 11:00 AM Place of Sale: At ppointed as personal repre• Special Notice of the filing of aged structures would be meeting. On 4/1/2008 at 10:00 AM Sale Information Please (all covenant or warranty, the North Market Street zntative to administer the an inventory and appraisal of repaired to a structurally A site visit will be held an the First American Loanstar (714)573.1965 express or implied, regard- entrance to the County state of the decedent. estate assets or of any peti• safe level. day preceding the hearing Trustee Services, as dui Y P372369 ing title, possession or Courthouse, 190 North HE PETITION requests the lion or account as provided Copies of the 2007 date listed above as part of appointed Trustee under and (Pub SN 3/12, 3/19, 3/26) encumbrances, to satisfy the . Market Street. San Jose. CA. ecedent's WILL and codi- in section 1250 of the California Building, the standard Site Visit pursuant to Deed of Trust indebtedness secured by Amount of unpaid balance Is, if any, be admitted to California Probate Code. A Plumbing, Mechanical, Committee agenda. Site vis- recorded 10/18/2006, as NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE said Deed of Trust, advances and other charges! Foliate. The will and any Request for Special Notice Electrical and Fire Codes, the its occur between 3:30 and Instrument No. 19146321, in TS NO. 07-57507 thereunder, with Interest as $351,387.54 The purported sdWIs. are available for farm is available from the proposed "Excavation and 5:00 p.m. The site visit is book , page , of Official TITLE ORDER NO. G736823 provided, and the unpaid property address is: 18433 xamination in the file kept court clerk. Grading" Code, the proposed open to the public. The Site Records in the office of the INVESTOR /INSURER NO. principal of the Note secured VANDERBILT DR SARATOGA V the court. Attorney for petitioner: "Repair and Reconstruction" Visit Committee will convene County Recorder of Santa 048252413 by said I Deed of Trust with CA SARATOGA. CA 94088 HE PETITION requests JOHN B. SINES Code and of the proposed at the City Hall parking lot at Clara County, State of APN NO. 386-49-008 interest thereon as provided Assessors Parcel No. 403 - uthority to administer the 342 STATE STREET, SUITE 1 Ordinance are on file and 3:30 p.m. on the day preced• California. Executed by: YOU ARE IN DEFAULT in said Note, plus fees, 28 -017 The undersigned state under the Independent LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 open to public inspection at ing the hearing and visit the David ) Torres, will sell at UNDER A DEED OF TRUST, charges and expenses of the Trustee disclaims any liabili- dministration of Estates Act. 650- 948.1096 the office of the City Clerk of site listed above and may public auction to highest DATED 1/02/2004. UNLESS Trustee and of the trusts cre- ty for any incorrectness of 'his authority will allow the (Pub SN 3/5. 3/12, 3119) the City of Saratoga, visit other sites as well. For bidder for cash, cashier's YOU TAKE ACTION TO PRO' ated by said Deed of Trust. the property address or ersonal representative to M Saratoga City Hall, 13777 more information please check /cash equivalent or TER YOUR PROPERTY, IT DATED: 3/05 /2008 other common designation, tke, many actions without �„"r: - Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070;. during regular f � lega contact the Community Development Department at other form of payment authorized by 2924h(b), MAY BE SOLD AT A PUBLIC SALE. IF YOU NEED AN RECONTRUST COMPANY 1757 TAPO CANYON ROAD, if any. shown herein. If no street address or other com• otaining court approval. efore taking certain very , " business hours. 408 868.1222 or review the (payable at time of sale in EXPLANATION OF THE SVW -88 SIMI VALLEY, mon designation is, shown, aportant actions, however. /s /Cathleen Boyer, Site Visit Agenda on the lawful money of the United NATURE OF THE PROCEED- CA 93063 directions to the location of ie presentative City Clerk City Website at www.sarato- States) At the entrance to ING AGAINST YOU, YOU Phone: (800) 2818219, the property may be ill o give notice CITY OF SARATOGA (Pub SN 3/5 8 3112) ga.ca.us. Co the Superior Courthouse, SHOULD CONTACT A Sale Information obtained by sending a writ• r ,i&, rsons unless 1 NOTICE OF INTENTION TO APPLICATION #PDR07 -0018 190 N. Markel San Jose, LAWYER. (626) 927.4399 ten request to the beneficia- ey ed notice or ADOPT AN ORDINANCE NOTICE OF HEARING (389.30.035) LEE; ]8853 CA All right, title and interest Notice is hereby given that By: Trustee's Sale Officer ry within 10 days of the date rnsented to the proposed AMENDING CHAPTER 16 OF BEFORE PLANNING ALLENDALE AVENUE: - The conveyed to and now held by RECONTRUST COMPANY, as RECONTRUST COMPANY is a of first publication of. this -ti, on.) The independent THE SARATOGA MUNICIPAL COMMISSION applicant requests Design it under said Deed of Trust in duly appointed trustee pur• debt collector attempting Notice of Sale. If the Trustee iministration auautTarity will —CODE- RELATING -TO -BUILD•— CITY- OF-SARATOGKS Review -approval- to-remove— the -pmpertysituated- unsaid suantAo- the - Deed- IJrust-4o ...uT llec.. " Abp; Any4n(w`is- unablelo_convey_Utle_tor_ . granted unless an interest- ING REGULATIONS AND PLANNING COMMISSION an existing one story single- County and State described executed by MICHAEL D mation obtained will be used any reason, the successful i person files an objection FIRE SAFETY announces the following family residence and con- as: As more fully described SALOMAN, AND KAREN A for that purpose. bidder's sole and exclusive the petition and shows NOTICE IS NEARBY GIVEN public . hearings on struct a new approximately in the above mentioned SALOMAN, HUSBAND AND ASAPi996131 remedy shall be the return of )od cause why the court that at 7:00 p.m. on March Wednesday, the 26th day of 6,015 square feet one-story Deed of Trust APN# 517.25- WIFE AS JOINT TENANTS, (Pub SN 3/5, 3/12, 3/19) r monies paid to the Trustee, could not grant the authori. 19, 2008, in the Community March 2008 at 7:00 p.m. in single family residence with 050 The street address and dated 01/02/2004 and and the successful bidder Theater; Saratoga City Hall, the City Council Chambers a proposed height ofapprox• other common designation, recorded 01/21104, as NOTICE Of TRUSTEE'S SALE shall have no further HEARING on the petition 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, located at 13777 Fruitvale imately 21 feet. The net lot if any, of the real property Instrument No. 17578885, in TS # CA -07. 114165 -NF recourse. ill be held on APRIL 7, Saratoga, CA 95070, the City Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070, size is approximately 92 described above is purport- Book , Page ), of Official LOAN If 9169958650 Date: 2/2712008 DOB, 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 15 Council of the City of Details and plans are avail. acres. The site is zoned R -1- ed to be: 15560 On Orbit Dr, Records in the office of the YOU ARE IN DEFAULT Quality Loan Service Corp. cated at 191 North First St., Saratoga will hold a public able at the Saratoga 40,000 (Single Family Saratoga, CA 95070 The County Recorder of Santa UNDER A DEED OF TRUST 2141 5th Avenue San Diego, an lose, CA 95113. hearing to consider adoption Community Development Residential). undersigned Trustee dis- Clara County. State of DATED 6/24/1992. UNLESS CA 92101619-645-7711 YOU OBJECT to the granti= of Ordinance amending Department, ens, APPLICATION #PDR07 -0010 claims any liability for any California, will sell YOU TAKE ON TO PRO- For NON g of the petition, you Chapter 16 of the Saratoga day, 7Mo a.m. (503.16.017) LU; 13414 SUR• incorrectness of the street AT PROPERTY, SALE y Could appear at the hearing Municipal Code, relating to • 5:00 P.M. If you have ques- REY LANE (Address changed address and other common THE NORTH MARKET STREET MAY BE SOLD AT A PUBLIC Sale Line: 714. 259.7850 id state your objections or building regulations and fire tions, Planners are available to 13426 Surrey Lane) -The designation, it any, shown ENTRANCE TO THE COUNTY SALE. IF YOU NEED AN or Login to: le written objections with safety. at the public counter applicant requests Design herein. Said sale will be COURTHOUSE, 190 NORTH EXPLANATION OF THE www.fidelityasap.com te court before the hearing. The proposed ordinance between the hours of 7:30 Review approval to demolish made, but without covenant MARKET STREET, SAN JOSE, NATURE OF THE PROCEED- Reinstatement Line: Nicole cur appearance may be in would adopt the 2007 a.m. and 12:00 noon. the existing home and con- or warranty, expressed or CA at public auction, to the ING AGAINST YOU, YOU Fuentes, Trustee Sale Officer struct a new two -story home. implied, regarding title, pos- highest bidder for cash of SHOULD CONTACT A If you have previously been The proposed structure will session, or encumbrances, check as described below, LAWYER. discharged through bank- Important Information: be approximately 5,515 to pay the remaining princi. payable in full at time of A public auction sale to the ruptcy, you may have been square feet and approxi- pal sum of the note(s) sale, all right, title, and inter- highest bidder for cash, released of personal liability Jo Canceled ads will receive credit for future advertising, mately 25 -feet 11- inches tall. secured by said Deed of est conveyed to and now cashier's check drawn on a for this loan in which case refunds after submission. The gross lot size is 47,480 Trust, with interest thereon, held by it under said Deed of .state or national bank, check this letter is intended to for acefund. Ads most be canceled before deadline for chat issue. square feet, and the site is as provided in said note(s), Trust, in the property situat• drawn by stale or federal exercise the note holder's - zoned R- 1•40,000. Design advances, under the terms of ed in said County and State credit union, or a check rights against the real prop• \dvertisemenrs arc accepted upon the representation that the advertiser and /or its Review is required pursuant said Deed of Trust, fees, and as more fully described drawn by a state or federal erty only. - igency have the right to publish the contents thereof. In consideration of such pub- to City Code section 15- charges and expenses of the in the above referenced savings and loan associa- THIS NOTICE IS SENT FOR ication, advertiser and its agency agree to indemnify and hold the publisher harm- 45.060. Trustee and of the trusts cre• Deed of Trust. The street lion, or savings association, THE PURPOSE OF COLLECT• against any expense or loss by reason of any claims arising out of publication. APPLICATION #PDR07 -0016 ated by said Deed of Trust, address and other common or savings bank specified in ING A DEBT. THIS FIRM IS ess f517. 08.025) ESTAHBANATI; The total amount of the designation, if any, of the Section 5102 to the Financial ATTEMPTING TO COLLECT A hi fhe ublisher reserves the r P advertising g ht to edit. alter, omit, or refuse any adising sub- 20731 St. Charles Street - unpaid balance of the oblig. real property described code and authorized to do DEBT ON BEHALF OF THE hissed. The applicant requests ation secured by the proper- above is purported to be: business in this state, will be HOLDER AND OWNER Of - Design Review approval to ly to be sold and reasonable 20042 KARN CIRCLE, held by duly appointed THE NOTE. ANY INFORMA- 'or uolidcs concerning specific cuegories, please refer to the paragraph at the begin- demolish the existing home estimated costs, expenses SARATOGA; CA, 95070. The trustee. The sale will be TION OBTAINED BY OR PRO- .ing of the category or call m at 408.200.1025 and construct a new two- and advances at the time of undersigned Trustee dis- made, but without covenant VIDED TO THIS FIRM OR THE .r email us at classifieds( -, community- newspapers.com. story home. The proposed the initial publication of the claims any liability for any or warranty, expressed or CREDITOR WILL BE USED structure will be approxi- Notice of Sale is incorrectness of the street implied, regarding title, pos- FOR THAT PURPOSE. mately 2.530 square feet $1,257,712.32 The beneficia- address and other common session, or encumbrances, As required by law, you are Valley Community Newspapers accepts no liability for its failure, for any and approximately 22-feet ry under said Deed of Trust designation, if any, shown to pay the remaining princi• hereby notified that a nega- Silicon cause, t0 insert an advertisement. Liability for any error appearing in an advertise- 8.5•inches tall. The gross lot heretofore executed and herein. The total amount of pal sum of the note(s) tive credit report reflecting nest is limited to the cosi of the space actual) occupied. No allowance, however, will P Y P size is 6,012 square feet, and the site is zoned R•]• delivered to the undersigned a written Declaration of the unpaid balance with interest thereon of the oblig• secured by the Deed of Trust, with interest and late on your credit record may be submitted to a credit report ie granted for an error that does not materially affect the value of the advertisement. 10,000. Design Review is Default and Demand for ation secured by the proper- charges thereon, as provided agency if you fail to fulfill the b qu ran adjustment, any error must be reported within 15 days of publication required pursuant to City Sale, and a written Notice of ty to be sold plus reasonable in the note(s), advances, terms of your credit obliga• t r errors is limited to first insertion. Code section 15.45.060. Default and Election to Sell. estimated costs, expenses under the terms of the Deed lions. ASAP# 987869 a (Pub SN 3/12) The undersigned caused and advances at the time of of Trust, interest thereon, (Pub SN 2127, 315, 3112) LEE RESIDENCE I PROJECT TEAM I PROJECT INFORMATION I Owner: Shiuh -Wuu Lee 1142 Littleoak Circle, San Jose, CA 95129 (tel) 408.253.0513 Architect: Studio 02 - Sunny Tam, A.I.A. 147 Castro St., Ste 2, Mountain View, CA 94041 (tel) 650.988.8877 (fax) 650.963.3310 Civil Engineer: RW Engineering- Theresa Wang 505 Altamont Dr., Milpitas, CA 95035 (tel) 408.262.1899 Landscape Architect : - Ron Cheung 771 St. James Dr., Morgan Hill, CA 95037 (tel) 408.529.2379 Soils Engineer: Wayne Ting & Associates, Inc. 42329 Osgood Road, Unit A, Fremont, CA 94539 (fel) 510.623.7768 I DRAWING INDEX I AO.0 PROJECT INFORMATION ABBREVIATIONS SYMBOLS A1.0 PROPOSED SITE PLAN A A.C. Asphalt C.—I. LB. // PO C OR ELEVATIONS Al A3.1 STREET ELEVATION A ACOUS Ac.T. Acoustical Acoustical TIT. LF. LKR. lightwell area BUILDING LAYOUT POINT BLP ARB RIS R PO T & D TAILS AC.P, Aeousfleal Panel LT. Standard #13. `. A State of California licensed fire protection contractor shall submit plans, calculations, a A.D. ADJ. Area D. LG. f prior to beginning their work. ACGR. A.F.F. Adjustable Aggregate Above Fbd.hed Floor UT. M Material DATUM POINT ELEVATION - licensed C -10 contractor shall submit to the fire deportment, plans, special 3 /ALUM. Aluminum M,B. N.C. Machine Bolt Medicinal Cobinef MATCH LINE ANG. /� Angle MELH. Meclhanical APPROx. ARCH. Approximate MEMB. Membrane PROPERTY LINE_ ASPH. Arehifseural Asphalt MET. MFR. Metal Manufacturer 0 At MH. Manhole B BKC. packing MIN. NIN. Minimum Nl DIM. ® F.0.5. /STRUC. BITUM BifumBoo, misc. ror Ml...Ikmeoua DIM. ® CENTER LINE BLDG. Building N.O. Masonry opening • BM.G BloBpinm YUL. MMuillon DIM. ® F.O.F. /CLEAR 8.0. B.U. Bottom of „ �t ” () NMsw (N) OR REQUIRED Bullf up N.I.G. Not In Cont —i ELEVATION POINT /"` CAP. Cabinet NO. // NOM. Number Nominal lJ C.BA. C.B. Carpet Base Catch Basle N.T.S. Nol to Seale (E) ELEVATION POINT +9, -0" ' CE4. CER. Lament Ceromlc O O/ Over L.I. Cast Iran C.J. conshu°H.n /control Joint O.A. O.C. Overall 0. Center A Q center un. O.D. Doti. outside Diameter (of-.) oppaali. Nana COLUMN GRID CLG. Ceiling CaC'ko;.g O.F.D. Neel— Drain cLOC. OBS. Obscure CLR, Clear OFF. Office C.O. Clean out oPNC. Opening COL Column OPP. Opposite DETAIL N0. 4 CONC. CONS. Concrete Conneelt0. P L P Pointed Concrete SHEET NO. A6 CON R. C ...fruetion P.G.B. Painted Gypsum Board CONE. CON" Continuous Contractor PKG. PRCST. Parking Pro -Cast WALL SECTION NO. 7 CORR. CPT. CoMdor Carpe} PL P.UM. Plate PlvsHc Laminate SHEET NO. A8 C.P. C.SO. CTSK. Cement Plaster Carpet Squon PLAS. PLYWD. PR. Paster Plywood Pair BUILDING SECTION 9 Coun }erelnk C.4. U. /CMU Cone. Masonry Unit PT. Point A2 CNTIL C.T. C...fer C.romt Tile P.T.D. Paper Towel Dispenser P.T.D /R. Combination Paper Towel 1 CTR. C.W. Center Curtain Wall PFN. Dsp....r & R.ceptacls Partition PAT. D Datum P.T.R. Paper T...I R.aepfaa. INTERIOR ELEVATION 4 9 2 DBL. DEPT. Double O,T. Puy A2 D.F. Ds artment P Drinking Founfain O.T. Tily Quarry Tila 3 DET. DIA. Delvll Moms'" R R. Riser DOOR N0. DIM. Dimension BAD. R.B. -4 Radius 4: Rubber Top set Ba.. DOOR TYPE 4 O DISP. DIG. Dbpeneer Decking R.B. -6 6� Rubber Top Set Base DN. Down R.O. Roof Drain WINDOW N0. OS D.O. D.P. Door Opening REF. REFR. Reference Refdgerotor DR' Dimension Point Door REINF. Reinforced Q DWI. Drawer REO. R fired REVISION NO. 3 DS. Downspout RESIL Resilient 'n - D.S.P. Dry Standpipe R.F. RFC. Resilient IT Roofing ROOM NAME ENTRY DWG. Droving RGTR. Register ROOM NO. 100 E E (E) East Existing RHWS. RN. Round Head Wood Screw Room E.J E.J. Each Expansion Joint R R.O. .O. Round Rough Opening EARTH EL /ELEV. ELEC. El ... dd..l Electrical Rr R.W.L. .W. eager Rain Water Loader ELEV. POROUS FILL / EN. ENCLCLR. ergency Em. Enetosure S S S.C. South sane care GRAVEL /ROCK f. E.P. Ebctrical Pared S.L.D. Seat Cover Dispenser E0. EQUIP. Equal Equal Equipment s.CONC. S.D. Sealed Concrete Schedule SAND /MORTAR/ E.P.L. El.etrical wm.r cooler S.D. soap Dlapena.r CEMENT PLASTER EXPO. EXP. Exposed Expansion SECT. SH . S She[ Shell EXT. Exterior sHR. Shower F.A. F Fire Alarm SHT. SSIM. Sheet CONCRETE F.B.O. Fumished by Owner SHT.MET. ShM Metal t Metal F.D. Floor Drain FDN. Foundation SN.D. Sanitary Napkin Di.p.n.. MASONRY WALL F.E. F.E.C. nro E.Hnguisher Firs ExH.gulsher Cab. SD.INSUL Sound Insulation SPEC. Specification F.F. F.G. Finish noon Flied GI... so. square BRICK /BRICK VENEER/ F.H.C. Fire Hose Cabinet S.SK. S.STL SeMce Sink Stainless Steel PAVER FHWS. Flat Head Wood So-. STp. Stalivn F - noor sTD. Standard QUARRY/ FIASX. Flashing STL STOR. steel Storage CERAMIC TITLE !. FLUOR. F.O.C. Fluoroxenf Face of Concrete STRUC. Strueturs /Struefural F.O.F. Feae of SUSP. - sX. Susp.nd.d sheet vinyl PLYWOOD ( F.O.N. FRPF. sniah MF,on Face o/ 1 stu ry Face Studs SYM. Symmetrical FRPF. i Fireproof SYS. system Fit FRG. F Frvming T Ta eo ROUGH WOOD E9 21 ,1. • F.S. F.S.R. Full Six. Fire Sprinkler Rlssr T.C. T...I Top of Curb FT. Foot or rest TEL Telephone FTG. Footing TEMP. Tempura o FINISH WOOD FFu yeR Terra: FUT. /(F) ure T. &G. T.G.B. Tongue & Groove Textured Gypsum eoock gA. G G Gauge CGrab THK. T.D. Thick Top of METAL I G.B. Bar Grab Bar T.O.C. Top o/ Cp..... G.CONC. Gun. Concrete T.P.D. Toilet Paper Dispeeeer GL. GND. Glues Ground T.v. T.O.W. T.1 -i.tan Top of Wall GYPSUM BOARD GR. Grads TYP. Typical GYP. Gypsum HHB. Ho.e Bibb Hollow Lon U UNF. U.O.N. unfinished Unless Otherwise Noted PROTECTION BOARD UM N.L. H.D. Hot Dipped UR. Urinal HOOP NDWO. Ha Hard wood VCR V VCT Vinyl Carpet Rsducer ACOUSTICAL TILE N.M. N.N. Hardware Hollow Metal VERT. Vinyl Composition Tile Vertical H Horfzo VEST. Vestibule HRR. . Hoour ur V.I.F. Fl Verity I GLASS NGT. Height V.T. V.W.C. Vinn yl TIl. Vinyl Wall Convering i,p, Inside olam.t.r Ineh WATERPROOFING/ IN. l4 ,. orb W w/ with FLASHING INSUL W.C. Water CI...t MT. wD. wood BLANKET OR BATT(X J W W.F. Window Wall Fabric INSULATION JTN K KS' W.N. .H. wvo Wafer Heater waterrpprroof RIGID INSULATION L uM' wscr. W.S.P. wain...f wet Stand Pipe LAV. W. weight RESILIENT FLOORING 1® Y YD. Yard LEE RESIDENCE I PROJECT TEAM I PROJECT INFORMATION I Owner: Shiuh -Wuu Lee 1142 Littleoak Circle, San Jose, CA 95129 (tel) 408.253.0513 Architect: Studio 02 - Sunny Tam, A.I.A. 147 Castro St., Ste 2, Mountain View, CA 94041 (tel) 650.988.8877 (fax) 650.963.3310 Civil Engineer: RW Engineering- Theresa Wang 505 Altamont Dr., Milpitas, CA 95035 (tel) 408.262.1899 Landscape Architect : - Ron Cheung 771 St. James Dr., Morgan Hill, CA 95037 (tel) 408.529.2379 Soils Engineer: Wayne Ting & Associates, Inc. 42329 Osgood Road, Unit A, Fremont, CA 94539 (fel) 510.623.7768 I DRAWING INDEX I AO.0 PROJECT INFORMATION concrete walkways TOPOGRAPHIC & BOUNDARY SURVEY A1.0 PROPOSED SITE PLAN A2.0 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN & ROOF PLAN swimming pool PO C OR ELEVATIONS Al A3.1 STREET ELEVATION A L SECTIONS C -1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN lightwell area C NC PT L D P N �-1 1 L- ARB RIS R PO T & D TAILS I PROJECT DESCRIPTION I SCOPE OF WORK: Existing single -story, single family residence to be demolished and replaced with proposed new single -story, single family residence with basement. Per the recommendation of the City Arborist, one exisiting tree will be removed, as indicated on the site plan. I PROJECT LOCATION I APN: 389 -30 -015 Zoning District: R -1- 40,000 Age of Existing Structure: 51 (c. 1956) Gross Lot. Size: 40,034 sf Average Slope of Site: 2.9% (level) Net Lot Size: 40,034 sf S = 0.0029 (1)(91 X7.56) / (.919) = 2.9% Allowable Floor Area: 6,020 sf Q7 Floor Area of Proposed Structure: 6,015.71 sf < 6,020 sf I Area of Basement: 1,658.6 sf II TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SITE COVERAGE FOR FRONT AND REAR LANDSCAPE: -- - PROPOSED SETBACKS: concrete driveway = 3,466 SF concrete walkways = 1,427 SF slate patios = 1,718 SF accessible ramps = 174 SF swimming pool = 833 SF pool mech area = 23 SF planter = 140 SF front entry steps = 127 SF lightwell area = 65 SF TOTAL IMPERVIOUS HARDSCAPE FOR FRONT & REAR LANDSCAPE = 7973 SF (19.9% OF MAX. 35% COVERAGE) MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE FOR R -1- 40,000 DISTRICT: 35% = 14,012 SO. FT. TOTAL SITE COVERAGE: Reauiredl min. Proposed Front(North) 30'I 47' -2" Side (East) 20' 25' -1 1/2" Side (West) 20' 31' Rear (South) 50' 74' -7" 13,989 SO. FT. < 14,012 SO. FT. (34.6% OF MAX. 35% COVERAGE, INCLUDING SO. FT. OF HOUSE) HEIGHT INFORMATION Q j. Lowest existing point at building's edge: +98' -6 1/2" " ii. Highest existing point at building's edge: +100' -2 7/8" )J)J iii. Average elevation of i and ii: +99' 4 11/16 iv: Topmost elevation point of structure: +120' -7 3/16' I S FIRE DEPT. COMMENTStLV'I vg Required Fire Flow: The fire flow for this project is 2250 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. As an �" H automatic fire sprinkler system will be installed, the fire flow has been re uced by 50 %, .. establishing a required adjusted fire flow of 1000 gpm at 20 psi residual ressure. Refer to San X Jose Water Company report in Planning response packet for additional iIT motion. 7 Automatic Fire SDrinkler System Required: Buildings requiring a fire flow inlexcess of 2,000 gpm. or three (3) or more stories in height, or in excess of 10,000 sq. ft., or pew homes located f within the hazardous fire area shall be protected throughout by an automatic fire sprinkler .Esg.'k system, hydraulically designed per National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard #13. `. A State of California licensed fire protection contractor shall submit plans, calculations, a completed permit application and appropriate fees to this department for review and approval f prior to beginning their work. Early Warning Fire Alarm System Required: Provide an Early Warning Fire Alarm System throughout .Gr all portions of the structure, installed per City of Saratoga Standards. Prior to installation, a - licensed C -10 contractor shall submit to the fire deportment, plans, special aiions & listings, a ,..... . .. - completed permit application, and applicable fees. for review and approval. udio 0 147 Castro street, ite 2 mountain view . c 4041 Via Z a� L Q 4 � Ga W aM W Q J 00 00 Q 11.19.07 PLANNING FIRST SUBMITTAL Q 01.29.08 PLANNING SECOND SUBMITTAL ?SEA ARCHi OAS ANT r� F s * C28457 07.31.200 e 9lf OF CA`-"a PROJECT NO.: 07 -2130 PROJECT INFORMATION �TRUE` COMiG'q COPYRIGHT 2008 . STUDIO 02, Inc. — N — V] tTj Y O x AA H �ee6 0 tNCFA r� y i F 41y1, t DATE 2 -28 -08 D W QU Q 0 00 W J � V/ •M'/ . AU) MW W T- ad U 00 OO m DATE 8EPr v.2WT SCALE AS NOTED DE&OI ®BY: RW DRAWN BY. RN 1 i ABBREVIATION P.U.E. UTILITY EASEMENT W.C.E. WI WIRE RE C CLEARANCE EASEMENT A.E. ANCHOR EASEMENT C / GONG CONCRETE C / SIDEWALK (CE& C(N) CURB k UTTER PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE W DRAIN INLET FG FINISH GRADE GF GARAGE GRADE FF FINISH FLOOR GRADE , . GE EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION 7 LEGEND � N 81'50' W 208.50' © WATM MR OR WATM VALV! CD( B rR2 HYDRANT — _ 5' P.U.E. — _ _ _ — — _ 6.1RH 1lIGT16 � _ — — — — 5' W.GE — — _ TRIM - 71i11NK OIAAA[IBt M 9PCCIG4 NOM WHO! KNOWN. • i C TOP Or CURB X rDIGL —[— OVERHIM VAM GROUND r F I OPP POWOt roll 2X10 AE I GROUND ,: 1234 SPOT 9LVATpN Q SSCO SANITARY SEWM CLrAN OUT Q ELEC UTS7TY BCR -TYP! A9 NOf® �y I 0— STRST LIGHT SITE BENCHMARK: I I I MINI 1RFI CITY OF SAN JOSE BENCHMARK BM 696 v f �,f }' i °• / THE LETTER Y IN THE WORD IRON ON TOP 0 OF CATCH BASIN EAST SIDE JACKSON N AVENUE NORTH OF ALUM ROCK AVENUE ELEVATION =97.83 N I f OI Ip Y` m Y of El 1�tl I HOUSE GROUND •00 GARAGE ' FF_100.43 I I I I PL I GROUND II N 8730' W 08.50' –,p– ALLENDALE AVE. — N — V] tTj Y O x AA H �ee6 0 tNCFA r� y i F 41y1, t DATE 2 -28 -08 D W QU Q 0 00 W J � V/ •M'/ . AU) MW W T- ad U 00 OO m DATE 8EPr v.2WT SCALE AS NOTED DE&OI ®BY: RW DRAWN BY. RN 1 is u Q(E) RESIDENCE(S) Ex a' wat �'1aclNC TO REMAIN 20' 9DE � TBACK ' N 81'50' W 208.50' 1,.� P PERTY LINE y . f... 2, 50' EAR SEIACK 1 x I 0 NOTE: PRIOR T=PLANS. TION BY THE CITY, SETBACK 30' ONT e) in fo®stu THE LLS OF R A WRITTEN 0' DIA. OAK TREE TO CERTIFICATION ETBACKS ARE PER REMAIN. THE APPROVED 20" TREE POOL ME CH. 20' 90E J o0 00 EQUIPMENT AREA r--21W i 2 I TREE INVENTORY LEGEND 6 i\ 1 6 � _ ` 12° REE 6' / / 9TEMOVED X 48' DIA. REE FRUIT TREE TO BE EX. 64' DIA. (DBH) OAK TREE 6• iI 1 i ._ I I TO REMAIN TREE PROTECTV E FENCING (6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCING) -- TREE CANOPY � SEE SHEET L -2 FOR COMPLETE ARBORIST x CONC CURB L GUTTER Allendale Ave. PLAN diol@ I •: 47' -2j' LAWN .- PROPOSE SETBACK 30' ONT e) in fo®stu SE ACK MAILS( 11 Iq�• A CONC CURB L GUTTER Allendale Ave. PLAN diol@ 147 costro street, ite ' mountain vie.. c 4041 988.8877 (f) 65 . 3.33 e) in fo®stu 2.net W n Z a° W Q °' no O Q 4 W J o0 00 11.19.07 PLANNING FIRST SUBMITTAL Q 01.29.08 PLANNING SECOND SUBMITTAL SEO AR y ��WY 7 7l * C28457 07.31.200 OF CA`\�0�2 PROJECT NO.: 07 -2130 PROPOSED SITE PLAN TRUE NORTH A1.0 1 COPYRIGHT 2008 . STUDIO 02, Inc. 1� SKYLIGHT BASEMENT 1,658.6 sf FC 'M sf �� �ttLyx x DORMER WITH ROOF MATERIAL: SPANISH TILE, z sj'��S STANDING -SEAM REFER TO MATERIALS BOARD FOR Area of main floor: > COPPER ROOF 5,846.17 + 169.54 (foyer > 15' in height) + "> I COLOR TYPE = 6,015.71 sf < 6,020 sf The basement is not included in floor area calculations. FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM NTS 4 27' -8' 12' -0' tO' -2' t Au. i� RA�LIP REC AREA BEDROOM _0 STORAGE R -2' STORAGE THEATER - I GUEST BEDROOM �.... DINING ROOK ' q�p= c1.osEr PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN X1/8 "1 2 S.-O.1 12' -0' tO' -2' i� RA�LIP BEDROOM _0 1 - I GUEST BEDROOM �.... DINING ROOK ' q�p= c1.osEr 4'_2. lip 3 CAR GARAGE •I n n 4 ...�, I � I , , LA fs' -4' rudio stro street, ite 2 in view . c 4041 L LV Q c� U) - DENOTES DIRECTION OF SLOPE, W LJ O 4:12 SLOPE, TYP. W �, Q PROPOSED R OF PLAN 1/8" 3 Uj 00 S' _6.___ BEDROOM PATIO BEDROOM !` 11.19.07 PLANNING FIRST SUBMITTAL KrtcNE ,m ° DAs Q 01.29.08 PLANNING SECOND SUBMITTAL o F/P LZ I 13' -B' _ WALK -IN �I CLOSET WALK -IN CLOSET wALlc -IN� ARCH CLOSET 1' Y �l � MASTER. BEDROOM . �� •i Vg's dN 7�S � n4 C28457 G Q WN r'- * GALLERY •' 07.31.200 F Of C^`EO D PUT : • LIBRARY PROJECT NO.: 07 -2130 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLAN I TRUE NORTH A2.0 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN 1 /8" 1 COPYRIGHT 2008. STUDIO 02, Inc. a K2 0 1 - I GUEST BEDROOM �.... DINING ROOK FOYER LIVING -mom : - I LA 32' -Y TIM ClENTRY LIBRARY PROJECT NO.: 07 -2130 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLAN I TRUE NORTH A2.0 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN 1 /8" 1 COPYRIGHT 2008. STUDIO 02, Inc. a _ EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND* 1❑ SPANISH TILE ROOF 0 SLATE TILE 3 ❑ PRE —CAST COLUMN • F41 STUCCO WALL 5 ❑ STUCCO TRIM © COPPER STANDING SEAM ROOF ❑7 LIMESTONE VENEER ® WROUGHT IRON RAILING /FENCING ❑9 'TRAVERTINE TILE 10 LIMESTONE WINDOW TRIM TO MATCH VENEER 1/ PRE —CAST STONE BALUSTER RAILING * REFER TO MATERIALS BOARD FOR ADDITIONAL COLOR /FINISH INFORMATION :7 • 3 � 8 A ------ - - - - -� �- -- -- - - - - - - - rawm cI .*. * NOTE: EXISTING GRADING TO REMAIN, TYP; REFER TO SHEET C -2 FOR DETAILED GRADING INFO. -------------- - ---- ----- -- ------- --- --- - - - - -L - - --- -- J J Ior111161 Kiel I -r -1 1 666 1 liii I 1 666 1 Ire l _— _16661 rl_e_I J J L. EAST ELEVATION (SIDE) 1 1/8" 1 4 W U2% Imill MM w_ ;i: 'pld , �i�a a a �Ml -lili iR•. 4lr4L_ W44 rRilrlriW_Vir_._„"R I �' mountain view I , l . i O &I ilrd OWN SOUTH ELEVATION (FRONT) _ W 0 zo O Qv uliMeraAArliplrlAr ArMat4 r ❑ r�dArtrlAi M4h4M44H r4M ' areraJri�M►rMgaMAtar4rNrgad4 r � } r � ar44en1r44trrrtrMlrMlAd1rHMRrarerl � a .. a' '. , al,i {a .,_.- MIaMAAAAraHrtlgaghlrMr � rlrera arrr lAdh aaaaaaaaaaia'aaaa 4 W O a ... ria ..,... ' .;.. ....,.. .... r. _ ... ...,.. ..,...... � 11.1 � J � lie■ lur,eesl u����'.����� !I pel airoeu' luuuerseeel 1 -- 1 urooront 1 -- 1 lorl fool 1 ■ ■.■ ■e orl I eee e1e I eer ■o o■ ■0 111 111 sii • u ooroeo ■■ sr,eo'so ■e ee, leer ru oo ■l, I�nl 1 le■ lus'ur) lu■rs■■ mal 1111 1111 o 0orerrr■■ 111111111 ler ■I_ I � 111 111 deer ■1e ■r ■e1! Q •1 — =_ii ii �=� ail iii �.',�LINIItIII no po re I�IIII. �ii I II ji iiiil����III�IIII��III������ll � _........ r l_� J J loll Heel liei0l J - - - -- J 0 Q o 0 0 11.19.07 PLANNING FIRST SUBMITTAL Q 01.29.08 PLANNING SECOND SUBMITTAL r NORTH ELEVATION (BACK) ,I * C28457 �p�� 07.31.200 I--- - - -- -- -- ---- -------- -------- -- - - - - -- Y OF A� PROJECT NO.: 07 -2130 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS o 00 A3.0 WEST ELEVATION (E) 1/8" 3 COPYRIGHT 2008 STUDIO 02, Inc. - E mma: 1 116 '.I I ■t■ -------------- - ---- ----- -- ------- --- --- - - - - -L - - --- -- J J Ior111161 Kiel I -r -1 1 666 1 liii I 1 666 1 Ire l _— _16661 rl_e_I J J L. EAST ELEVATION (SIDE) 1 1/8" 1 4 W U2% Imill MM w_ ;i: 'pld , �i�a a a �Ml -lili iR•. 4lr4L_ W44 rRilrlriW_Vir_._„"R I �' mountain view I , l . i O &I ilrd OWN SOUTH ELEVATION (FRONT) _ W 0 zo O Qv uliMeraAArliplrlAr ArMat4 r ❑ r�dArtrlAi M4h4M44H r4M ' areraJri�M►rMgaMAtar4rNrgad4 r � } r � ar44en1r44trrrtrMlrMlAd1rHMRrarerl � a .. a' '. , al,i {a .,_.- MIaMAAAAraHrtlgaghlrMr � rlrera arrr lAdh aaaaaaaaaaia'aaaa 4 W O a ... ria ..,... ' .;.. ....,.. .... r. _ ... ...,.. ..,...... � 11.1 � J � lie■ lur,eesl u����'.����� !I pel airoeu' luuuerseeel 1 -- 1 urooront 1 -- 1 lorl fool 1 ■ ■.■ ■e orl I eee e1e I eer ■o o■ ■0 111 111 sii • u ooroeo ■■ sr,eo'so ■e ee, leer ru oo ■l, I�nl 1 le■ lus'ur) lu■rs■■ mal 1111 1111 o 0orerrr■■ 111111111 ler ■I_ I � 111 111 deer ■1e ■r ■e1! Q •1 — =_ii ii �=� ail iii �.',�LINIItIII no po re I�IIII. �ii I II ji iiiil����III�IIII��III������ll � _........ r l_� J J loll Heel liei0l J - - - -- J 0 Q o 0 0 11.19.07 PLANNING FIRST SUBMITTAL Q 01.29.08 PLANNING SECOND SUBMITTAL r NORTH ELEVATION (BACK) ,I * C28457 �p�� 07.31.200 I--- - - -- -- -- ---- -------- -------- -- - - - - -- Y OF A� PROJECT NO.: 07 -2130 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS o 00 A3.0 WEST ELEVATION (E) 1/8" 3 COPYRIGHT 2008 STUDIO 02, Inc. - 0 u SETBACK NORTH ELEVATION (BACK) 1 /8" 1 2 • f f liu,l 1_•_4 WEST ELEVATION (SIDE) 1 /8" I 3 iiolu a 147 Castro street, ite 2 mountain view . c 4041 988,8677 (f) 65 . 3.3310 -.Cr) info®stu 2.net W a V �� a° Z � Uj (1) oQ ,�g W �, o W aQ4 00 P 11.19.07 PLANNING FIRST SUBMITTAL Qj 01.29.08 PLANNING SECOND SUBMITTAL i F * 07..3151 20 .200 M� r 7t `� Of CAS PROJECT NO.: 07 -2130 STREETSCAPE ELEVATIONS A3.1 EAST ELEVATION (SIDE) 1 /8" 4 COPYRIGHT 2008 . STUDIO 02, Inc. • — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - mom 0 m 0 OEM so IN so -rT- ------------------------------------------------------------- ----- III aw BASEMENT III III � Lu ------ -------- ------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- 7 - - - - - -- _ ------------------------------------------- SECTION 13 16" 1 Z C-4 co SECTION- GARAGE 13/16"1 3 - i� fib 11.19.07 PLANNING FIRST SUBMITTAL A 01.29.08 PLANNING SECOND SUBMITTAL SECTION- FOYER%BEDIROOM 13 C28457 07.31.200 'j�OfCAt L— — — — — — — J 1 00 DINING A COURTYARD GALLERY I UVING ROOM cj PROJECT NO.: 07-2130 KITCHEN GUEST BEDROOM n n 10 17 � co co 11 I BASEMENT SECTION 13/16"1 6 SECTION 1-3/167- 5 PROPOSED BUILDING SECTIONS A4.0 SECTION-]3/16"74 COPYRIGHT 2008 . STUDIO 02, inc. • t — N — Scab: 11' - 20' Ll NOTES TO CONTRACTOR 1. OBTAIN AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FROM PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO START OF ANY DRIVEWAY APPROACH DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION AT THE STREET. CONTACT PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEER, MACEDONIO NUNEZ. AT (408) 868 -1218 FOR INFORMATION REGARDING OBTAINING AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. 2- ALL ELECTRIC LINES, COMMUNICATION LINES AND APPURTENANCES, INCLUDING ALL PUBLIC UTILITY, CAN AND TELEGRAPH SYSTEMS, SHALL BE LOCATED AND INSTALLED UNDERGROUND. !s" _ N_ 8150' W 208.50' _ SP.U.E. _________ 5'W.C.E. —_ - -_ _ - - - -_ _ —J I � a 21Ga , I 2X70 AE I y I I� LAWN f POOL LAWN g' 2% a I I — SS SANITARY SEWER UNE SD W I a 1 8sl I STREET LIGHT ❑ PG&E f D4 WV LAWN ® 9P I STORM DRAIN MANHOLE 0 SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE H 0 BENCHMARK _200— ANITARY SEWER CLEAN -OUT ONTOUR UNE U I u I SWALE FLOW DIRECTION 0 MON 100.00 E- SHEETFLOW DIRECTION E3DS I Z alfl O C O i�m ° a'' a'• (ix O j 12' PINE N f ��t�.,./r/�i (]gl j V' IZ F� D p e (E) & (N) EXISTING & NEW „ a C & G FGA ? � 99.50 u 12' MIN. A• PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE x \ DI � I C f I 11 s? �,a "a, ,+ FINISH GRADE 1 £ GARAGE GRADE FF FINISH FLOOR GRADE • .n sAl I EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION 8s MIR-_ aP s' ° I I NEW RESIDENCE FF 101.50 FL m i I I BSW PAD 99.00 FG •8M1 FS Hl. PT. HIGH POINT I O 100.20 d° M7 I I WIN. ° rn GONG D/W 101.00 Q � N ^I' I GR^'" a a 99.90 „ 100.00 99.80 100.20 I �J FG I LAWN ° 100.40 l' CONIC D/W a�° I Aa a'' I Jr Ia� y LAWN r a i J I 1 GRADING NOTES: 1. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF UBC, UMC, UPC, NEC, AND ITY OF SARATOGA, AND COUNTY STANDARDS. I 2. THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER OF WORK WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ENFORCIN SAFETY MEASURES AND REGULATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST DESIGN, CONSTRUCT, INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN ALL SAFETY DEVICES, INCLUDING SHORI G, AND SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMING TO ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS, LAW AND REGULATIONS. 3. PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL JOINT /CROSSIN LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK, FLOW LINES, PAVEMENT, STREETS, AND ALL GRADE JOINTS. IF DISCREPANCY IS FOUND, THE CON ACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AND NOT PROCEED PATH ANY CONSTRUCTION UNTIL VERIFICATION AND REVISION (IF NECESSAR) IS COMPLETED BY THE SAID ENGINEER. 4. THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES /STRUCTURES SHOWN HEREON WERE OBTAINED FROM INFORMATION FURNISHED BY OTHERS. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS AND ACCURACY OF SAID INFORMATION. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ASCERTAIN THE TRUE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL LOCATION AND SIZE OF THOSE TO BE USED AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGE TO ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE UTILITIES SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN HEREON. 5. THE SOIL REPORTS PREPARED FOR THE PROJECT IS A PART OF THIS PLAN. THE MOST STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS BY SOIL ENGINEER OR GOVERNING AGENCIES SHALL PREVAIL. 6. GRADING SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE SOIL REPORT FOR THIS SITE TOGETHER WITH ANY SUPPLEMENTS THERETO. ALL GRADING WORK SHALL BE DONE UNDER TH OBSERVATION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOIL ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48 HOURS BEFORE THE START OF ANY GRADING. 7. PRIOR TO START OF ANY WORK, CONTRACTOR MUST REVIEW THE PLANS FOR DESIGN INCONSISTENCIES AND TYPOS SUCH AS ELEVATIONS, CURB HEIGHT, DIMENSIONS, SLOPES, ETC. IF INCONSISTENCIES OR OBVIOUS TYPOS ARE F ND, THE CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF WORK FOR VERIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH ANY WORK. I B. THE CIVIL ENGINEER WILL BE REQUIRED TO VERIFY ON THE GRADING PERMIT THAT E PAD LOCATION AND ELEVATION IS CONSTRUCTED PER APPROVED PLANS PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION. THE CIVIL ENGINEER WILL ALSO BE REOLIRED TO CERTIFY THAT THE SITE WAS GRADED IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE TO THE APPROVED PLANS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 9. THE LANDSCAPE FINISHED GRADES WITHIN FIVE FEET OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTU SHALL SLOPE AT A 2% MINIMUM FROM THE FOUNDATION- ALL EXTERIOR HARD SURFACING AREAS (INCLUDING TERRACES) SHALL BE INSTALLED WI A 1% MINIMUM GRADIENT, AND SHALL DRAIN AWAY FROM THE BUILDING. FINISHED GRADE DRAINAGE SWALES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 1 MAXIMUM GRADED SLOPE IS 3:1 (3 HORIZONTAL TO 1 VERTICAL). SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLAN SHALL DICTATE ACTUAL GRADE . SURFACE SLOPE GRADES NOTED ON THE PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. 10. EXPORT MATERIAL (IF ANY) SHALL BE DISPOSED'OF IN AN ACCEPTABLE LOCATION. 11. ANY CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT -OF -WAY MUST HAVE AN APPROVED PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE PUBLIC STREET PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THIS WORK. THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS WORK IS NOT AUTHORI ED BY THE BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE, BUT SHOWN ON THE BUILDING PERMIT PLANS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. _j NOTE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL FINISH FLOOR, GARAGE FLOOR, AND PAD ELEVA WITH STRUCTURAL PLAN PRIOR TO f CONSTRUCTION. 4' PERIMETER SUBDRAIN l O 1% MIN. CONNECT TO DI (SEE STRUCTURAL PLAN) 1 6• Iy a - 8 8 Na A _ - a- J I f FG .gyp .a. .y INSTALL NEW 107 40 TBM. INSTALL NEW FG 20' D/W 100.00 20' D/W 98.65 .REMOVE REMOVE EX. D/W CENTERLINE _ _ EX. D/W _ _ - 04 - «_.- cs- __ SS -�. _5s_-_ S_- _SS - - -SS— SS-- SS-- SS - -SS— SS--- SS._-- 55- .-- SS_- _.S__._ c5 - - -_ ? .o �o ALLENDALE AVE. TYPICAL GRADING AROUND FOUNDATION NOT TO SCALE Q I I 4* MIN SECTION A,A NOT M SCALE J LEGEND — SS SANITARY SEWER UNE SD STORM DRAIN LINE W WATER UNE 7{X STREET LIGHT ❑ PG&E PG & E VAULT D4 WV WATER VALVE ® CURB CATCH BASIN 0 SOMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE 0 SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE O SSCO 0 BENCHMARK _200— ANITARY SEWER CLEAN -OUT ONTOUR UNE w� SWALE FLOW DIRECTION 0 MON MONUMENT E- SHEETFLOW DIRECTION E3DS cam WATER METER DOWNSPOUT W/ SPLASH -BLOCK C FIRE HYDRANT (ix O j 12' PINE TREE - TRUNK DIA. IN INCHES SPECIES NOTED WHEN KNOWN. ��t�.,./r/�i (]gl j TREE TO BE REMOVED BENCHMARK NAIL ON PAVEMENT ELEVATION = 100.00 liss Hi - SO3,1 � clvL a � , 2/28/08 W Z QU Q 0 Z �_ W J Q (/) U) Go co T_ Z Zg Q a. Z v Q Z o I SCALE AS NOT® I 1 X FENCE E OVERHEAD WIRES 0 PP POWER POLE 20.59 — SPOT ELEVATION ABBREVIATION P.U.E. PUBUC UTILITY EASEMENT P.S.S.E. PRIVATE SANITARY EASEMENT C CONCRETE: S/W SID (E) & (N) EXISTING & NEW C & G CURB & GUTTER 12' MIN. PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE WELL- DRAINED DI DRAIN INLET TOPSOIL FG FINISH GRADE GFF GARAGE GRADE FF FINISH FLOOR GRADE GE EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION TC TOP OF CURB FL FLOW LINE BSW BACK OF SIDEWALK AC ASPHALT CONCRETE Hl. PT. HIGH POINT G.B. GRADE BREAK BENCHMARK NAIL ON PAVEMENT ELEVATION = 100.00 liss Hi - SO3,1 � clvL a � , 2/28/08 W Z QU Q 0 Z �_ W J Q (/) U) Go co T_ Z Zg Q a. Z v Q Z o I SCALE AS NOT® I 1 C7 a. a f (3) T -1 (1) T -7 (1) T -2 (1) T -7 0' OIA. OAK TREE 70 REMAIN. 20" TREE POOL MECH. 20' SIDE �20 ICK S �t� EOUIPMENT AREA �- SETBACK N e1 zoBSO' p PERTY LINE -� S S -3 S -3 S -3 S 3 `. S -3 S -3 S-3 S-4 S -3 -3 S- S -3 3 \ 1.4�r $-4 1 ' -6' 4 z9 -6 / S -0': S-4 S,3 -16 16 S 5-4 $ 4 S-0 ' / (5)S- 1 9 S -2 S2 (5) 5.10 .. " - - 50' EAR - O _ SET ACK -16 - - 5)S- L! 1 . . (7) S,10 (11) S -9 (5) S-15 s 8 _ _ ,) S =1' 1 8_1 (10) 9 S 1 S -11 $ O - - - . . SPA 34'X18' POOL .(1) S'1 .. Q 10) LAWN (2) GC -2 S-13 / . S S-4 \. _.. . _......_ .. ... .. _... _ _. - ....... ....... _..... _ _. _ _ . _ .... ... 1 ._ T _ I. W SELF CLOSING —1- S-4 S -11 . .- 18' SEATWA 39. -7' - - - - SEE —1- DETAIL C ON L -2 . - PLANT URN, TYP - (1) T� 11 O, LAWN . (3) X (14) S -14 LAWN 31 W HIGH TREWS $,W/ COLUMN POS ,•pX BO.: BRED CONC. A 0 - TREE FRUIT S-1 REMOVED - - . . "15 - -5 ......� ....,� 5 -11 S 11 \ RAILINGS, TYPt _" ) . "_ STRE . .. WALKWAY, TIP.' i S 3 (9)S-10 (2) GG3 .. �. . II RECAST TOTAL IMPERVIOUS HARDSCAPE FOR THE FRONT AND REAR LANDSCAPE CONIC. DRIVEWAY =3,466 SO. FT CONC. WALKWAYS =1,427 SO. FT SLATE PATIOS =1,718 SO. FT HANDICAP RAMPS =174 SO. FT SWIMMING POOL -833 SO. FT POOL MECH. AREA -23 SO. FT RAISED PLANTER =140 SO. FT FRONT ENTRY STEPS =127 SO. FT LIGHTWELL AREA -65 SO. FT TOTAL IMPERVIOUS HARDSCAPE FOR 7973 SO. FT FRONT k REAR (19.9% OF MAX LANDSCAPE 35% COVERAGE) NET SITE AREA: 40,034 SO. FT. TOTAL SO. FT. OF HOUSE: 6,015.71 MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE FOR R -1- 40,000 DISTRICT: 35% = 14,012 SO. FT. TOTAI SITE COVERAGE 13,989 S0. FT c 14.012 SO. FT (34.9% OF MAX 35% COVERAGE INCLUDING HOUSE SO. FT.) \(11) S -13 x�w n j oow zoos corn y over 61.1 I i PLANT LIST J o. S -3 S -16 BY S -12 2nd reVi6ed pI0n5:1 14 0 EC s _ T -2 159 1 Arbutus 'Morina' Strawberry Tree T -3 159 3 A— palr%gturn 111— digood' Red Japanese Maple T -4 15g 3 Prunus i pendula' Weeping Flowering Cherry T -5 15g 1 La9erstrdmio indite 'cherokee' Red Gape Myrtle T -6 159 2 Cercis oocidentolis Western Redbud S -3 S-16 T -7 15g 2 Tristan'. laurina Brisbane box T -8 1, 2 Pkcea g,,'conica' Dwarf olberta spruce SCALE S -0 5q 3 Sygzium'paniculoto 'Topiary 3 -Tier Topiary Brush Cherry S -1 15g 5 Cycos re�luta Sago Palm S -2 59 18 Juniper q- !bloari Blaaw's juniper -To 4' ft high max. S -3 5g 38 Pho mia froseri PhotiMe S -4 5g 22 Rhaphiolepsis I. 'Ballerina Pink Hawthorn rWxr $� S'16 nnTr - nnnl� S -5 59 B Camellia' asanqua 'Jean May. Double Pink Camellia S -6 5g 8 Gardsnioj josmino�des Mystery Gardenia S -7 19 10 Buxus '.''))"Winter em' Boxwood S -8 lg 50 HemerocWhs hybrids Lemon Dip'ellow Dayfay S -9 19 35 Agapantrius Peter Pan' Lily of the Nde S -10 tg 30 Armerio maritime Sea pink 5 -11 lg 35 lawndulo1 atoechys Lavender S -3 _ OF SHEETS uLlu N op a S -12 5g 19 Escallonia 'compakta' Escollonio -To 4' ft high max. S -13 1g 34 Scoevolaf M Clusters' Fanflower S— 14 1g 46 Festuca d Sheep fescue S -15 lg 10 Phormium t b o ze baby New Zeeland flax To 3- It high max. S -16 19 10 Ceonolrtus g h Cannel creeper- To 2' ft high me S -17 lg 7 Azaea tidy Cal. Sunset' Azalea- pink /while S -18 tg 8 Aucuba I: nano Dwarf Jap oucubo a •,S- DECORATIVE WALL.TYP. I S-3 S -1B SEE DETAIL A ON L- PIER W1 PRECAST CONIC. CAP 3 (1)S-O 11 ..._. ...._... earn SEE DETAIL A ON L- EW GATE II i (1) T -5 ; S -3 EX. 6' HIGH FENCING ' TO REMAI S_3 I TOTAL IMPERVIOUS HARDSCAPE FOR THE FRONT AND REAR LANDSCAPE CONIC. DRIVEWAY =3,466 SO. FT CONC. WALKWAYS =1,427 SO. FT SLATE PATIOS =1,718 SO. FT HANDICAP RAMPS =174 SO. FT SWIMMING POOL -833 SO. FT POOL MECH. AREA -23 SO. FT RAISED PLANTER =140 SO. FT FRONT ENTRY STEPS =127 SO. FT LIGHTWELL AREA -65 SO. FT TOTAL IMPERVIOUS HARDSCAPE FOR 7973 SO. FT FRONT k REAR (19.9% OF MAX LANDSCAPE 35% COVERAGE) NET SITE AREA: 40,034 SO. FT. TOTAL SO. FT. OF HOUSE: 6,015.71 MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE FOR R -1- 40,000 DISTRICT: 35% = 14,012 SO. FT. TOTAI SITE COVERAGE 13,989 S0. FT c 14.012 SO. FT (34.9% OF MAX 35% COVERAGE INCLUDING HOUSE SO. FT.) \(11) S -13 x�w n j oow zoos corn y over 61.1 I i PLANT LIST J REVISIONS BY SYM. SIZE OTY. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME T -1 159 3 Behla pendulo White birch 2nd reVi6ed pI0n5:1 14 0 EC YL T -2 159 1 Arbutus 'Morina' Strawberry Tree T -3 159 3 A— palr%gturn 111— digood' Red Japanese Maple T -4 15g 3 Prunus i pendula' Weeping Flowering Cherry T -5 15g 1 La9erstrdmio indite 'cherokee' Red Gape Myrtle T -6 159 2 Cercis oocidentolis Western Redbud DATE T -7 15g 2 Tristan'. laurina Brisbane box T -8 1, 2 Pkcea g,,'conica' Dwarf olberta spruce SCALE S -0 5q 3 Sygzium'paniculoto 'Topiary 3 -Tier Topiary Brush Cherry S -1 15g 5 Cycos re�luta Sago Palm S -2 59 18 Juniper q- !bloari Blaaw's juniper -To 4' ft high max. S -3 5g 38 Pho mia froseri PhotiMe S -4 5g 22 Rhaphiolepsis I. 'Ballerina Pink Hawthorn 3 32 " =1'- " JOB NO. �1V S -5 59 B Camellia' asanqua 'Jean May. Double Pink Camellia S -6 5g 8 Gardsnioj josmino�des Mystery Gardenia S -7 19 10 Buxus '.''))"Winter em' Boxwood S -8 lg 50 HemerocWhs hybrids Lemon Dip'ellow Dayfay S -9 19 35 Agapantrius Peter Pan' Lily of the Nde S -10 tg 30 Armerio maritime Sea pink 5 -11 lg 35 lawndulo1 atoechys Lavender L -1 NORTH OF SHEETS N op a S -12 5g 19 Escallonia 'compakta' Escollonio -To 4' ft high max. S -13 1g 34 Scoevolaf M Clusters' Fanflower S— 14 1g 46 Festuca d Sheep fescue S -15 lg 10 Phormium t b o ze baby New Zeeland flax To 3- It high max. S -16 19 10 Ceonolrtus g h Cannel creeper- To 2' ft high me S -17 lg 7 Azaea tidy Cal. Sunset' Azalea- pink /while S -18 tg 8 Aucuba I: nano Dwarf Jap oucubo a GC -1 flat 10 Istma utvialis Blue Star Creeper GC -2 So ♦ Annual WpGC t m par t ens chlo giona Blue Damatian Bel lflower (11) S-14 (3) T -3 (3) eopae.e$am �! 1�'�1• �� fi} ��I�YI��• r 0 IL C: ;, :!RB Z G.-. 71 ER Allendale Ave. r,/EX. 48' DIA rY'✓" EX. 64' DIA. - TREE )TO BIE j(DBH) OAK TREE ;.REMOVED TO REMAIN TREE PROTECTIVE FENCING (6' HIGH CHAIN — — — — LINK FENCING) TREE CANOPY SEE SHEET L -2 FOR COMPLETE ARBORIST REPORT. EX. 6' HIGH FENCING TO REMAIN V U Q) U) (n _Q) (D J () 0- C) () Cf) U-0 C) g Op UJ .0 >� O Q' u ^ / 0 0 C Cu Q) Q 0 O Lc) U 0 0 _�Zc.... CHECKED YL DATE 1 -1 - SCALE ..._.... 3 32 " =1'- " JOB NO. �1V L -1 NORTH OF SHEETS 0 4. i �1 0 Rnfnwtlr A.srw ' I 8wrwp.0lseblKm pd � ARBO WREAte ApPDadw f. ARB01 OpM APN 3W]( (II5 B4 CM, IT.2Wf APNIlsk0w Papad by Eale Bar, LAy Albmin Pwc Shi16Wm SYodrYa6 H. I- Pbm(M6)868 -1276 BKrRODBCTION The Poem -of 16653 AIk Avenue be aubdnd plea m I .iIy m dmobb ft imm, II-and bald a aW'ink Lilly bane m the papmy. T- I pvbmkd by CRY odmao<s and Pdmbaby itg4t W by cammtim wee avmmrid b do mpaL lm bab arc h itKldd a • Tens mvrnmry Tabk tl the mdMWb repwc Tm haaviom+aa mmkd m t6eamcbd copy oflb him PIm. Phem lb, Npa mrLde Shed 1, Coven Sheet Shen Al.R Sim Pim Sbd l 2, TFKKK Pla; Sbm 4A ilKraeelr, ad Shed 5.4 Swwe dad Nmemba I9.2WT and pepmd by SVtlio OL AW evi -Twee Sbm 1.Odio6 rd Dama6e by RW F "T"•d dNOVSmba 2. 3110/md STm 1, LmG ComW PI= dwt 111 ®1c 14. 20(Y7 by Rm Cbe Repaend Ripe Amhimt. STTE ORS R ATIONS, PLAN Riff EW AND TRClIN1CAL DISCUSSION TWOI-ak pda yuvpcled by oaotrumoa Tby'oKh* om Bova,, pT®(41) and arc c K Im ad Teri, The fl-i's Pbn h in oadBa with b pajm and a dad and dmM b removed. Tb mm tiro mk ®b ,,_,y paamd wish fevdv8 dma6 mom¢tim. T.61m Mb rbewe orbx ,NlmNe fi.W bmMm6 ph- and bab b mebavdm dW-pbn ad 6a1 bmldm8 pbK set Any'K MKY nacbm6 b aso0rdenof -B.. and PKO1'a�_rbould �inondde dtb ea aWA me n andinP tivef in6. Pa City onfi EIS- 50.060,•hood 7 'b' *`_W wiirb i. mN0014 o "RcmW rpp4hed vatic dbee YL h K4md• Appraid vMms art IakWtld raebiN mtb G.f6Aw PImNApPrvkeL ✓' 6dRlce. prbllAd 6y OK hvmelimel Soaay dArboeimlme (ISA).2000 awlumtim wiet b sptm Lummarim and GKmP Aadtpeem heot.plbRand by uK wean LT.WmerdK mmvmiovu Soda)' dAtbekuleve (2004] RECOMMENDATIONS 1. llua mile rtPon, including th<Tae Ne'm1nY Tabk and mqr dmwinl modem Kfom aM pmerdre fmdnb JWl b incmPeamd rtdo Ib m of fend btrilday plan GATE END. 1 -3/4' X 14 GA 5' Pap. Kfl 16853 NloNde A. 2 TPe pmxetivefacing elWl himmllda Mnmbamm�d ms➢m6 ambtidled dpemo6mlbe arrival ofmvmucpm eryipmex mvweridf maitc Rrbllb Pi -Tae AigA cbaa tid fm® ;vlcaffid Id8m-ma a4ofe b cbmg "HMI pool driven 2A bbn itno l..dk and NI IM, ee tllel0f Kj Tb Oaa wbRa pd raela8 eotl rends aadhlorbd aM 1e mhMfed Yeas 1-I dN -1 b, ba proms x00ealhw-kai TaK kfin dNi na ahObioR^cM4ad appoved by lb Co Arboritl yrior m o�W6 blriMvµ Eic'iem PmnilA 3. Owen ebdl pot'ideahee pota6m bovdm dK neaev of$53M pie m emd bitlitq dividm Pm The bod ahatlm aPTKW fe dWd Im Term wwmucOm pojmm emee dx peremimofb -Goa b p l a ojm TaT® .P Tulp-I by dK City AAaritl, or bens ®b ele4rd. 4. WpedivgmtrtncbiK6 abB oae mdabcrnopy ofoY ane n. Nlitdndm and PmmbitV b pool egspolea NMI1maa ouldde oflb lvrad wa aomd Wir Im. 5- Any pma6. -m IN mon W pm( and Wd the ngPV Iofm LSA Cm fiW Mhmim ands Twz m 6A MldedA b Cadedml8n ve mPmmimd wiDa lS fed oflrte er. T. ®end �ofwtl6vmfW Pmdmn.mrlmh6 bP mtl®m6mcbooiah.Pm rive vmm. Nel. bdridda, a atba oWmiW. h pmhbild bmatb Ira ampiae mywbP m rite thtl Mlon die bmetA ten mmpia. T-B-I r: Tm BKM iem Tm mreamry Tabk Map Shewiy Tm Pmladve Femnl l.00dms Pepe 2 oft I 2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS / PANELS. SLOPE TO MATCH CURBWALL I I 3. LC = LATCH CLEARANCE VARIES ACCORDING TO HARDWARE. TREE INVENTORY TABLE f i' - 6' SEE PLANS 5. AVAILABLE SIZES: 2 -1/2' X 12 GA, 3' X 12 CA_. 4' X 11 GA, 6' X 3/16'. 6. GATE SHALL BE AN AUTOMATIC GATE SYSTEM WITH BI- PARTING REMOTE SYSTEM ENTRY GATE WITH PILASTER COLUMNS DETAIL B F 19' S0. ---- -� PRECAST 8 LLNOSE PIER -CAP - COLOR TO BE SELECTED 13Y j� OWNER TYPICAL FENCE STYLE - I OWNER TO SELECT STYLE 2' IT €6 3.98' I J� �7R Qa t9' 9r 5 f�Ti c$'4 9.9 6 5' NATURAL STONE VENEER FINISH TO MATCH 2' 12 HOUSE'S STONE VENEER 1214 X 8l CMU BLOCKS N% TREE w.Me NATURAL STONE VENEER FINISH TO MATCH 1 Amore T3 _ HOUSE'S STONE VENEER #4 REE ® 18' 0.0 x na LHe ut :K w. m w sees CONCRETE FOOTING 24X36' DEEP L _ -7-it - J CONCRETE FOOTING 24•X36" DEEP LOW ENTRY FRONT FENCE /WALL sssm D TtlN Aeralet YrY I Iyfp Re T-K Ter Vabv I If a.An•f150Hdhoa -f5m Mrb b =•fl3m u�4 -f5.m0 Slknem•TAm Tt mbbu- flS,mK awa me.a kmw aspen s.v.i6 h nymC m � da 4 ®p. Sbxtl ee aer mtNlo.e h�rf emwlwgil anpYa• numwiW em wv:w.aQa.,l.. 1 IEIdI A6eWY Aw Dvavbv IT, Im CITY OF SARATOGA TREE ARBORIST REPORT AND TREE INVENTORY TABLE LENGTH VARIES -SEE PLAN FOR DRIVEWAY WIDTH C POST - ANCHOR BOLT TO PIER TYPICAL GATE STYLE- SO. OWNER TO SELECT STYLE T -3.98• j ' ,{ PICKET I I I I 1' SO. X 14 G4 1-3/4- X L j - -- 1 -3/4' X 14 CA - -- PROVIDE ELECT. CONDOR FOR FUTURE 120 V LIGHT CONCRETE FOOTING 24X36• DEEP TUBULAR STEEL POST, 2- SO.. 14 1 WITH STEEL CMS WELDED TO POST PRECAST BULLNOSE PIER -CAP COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY OWNER 16X16 PIER BLOCKS NATURAL STONE VENEER FINISH TO MATCH PXC HOUSE'S STONE VENEER PAVING /3 STIRRUPS 012' O.0 VERTICAL BARS NOTES: 1. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS / PANELS. SLOPE TO MATCH CURBWALL I I 3. LC = LATCH CLEARANCE VARIES ACCORDING TO HARDWARE. 4. HC = HINGE CLEARANCE VARIES ACCORDING TO HARDWARE. i' - 6' SEE PLANS 5. AVAILABLE SIZES: 2 -1/2' X 12 GA, 3' X 12 CA_. 4' X 11 GA, 6' X 3/16'. 6. GATE SHALL BE AN AUTOMATIC GATE SYSTEM WITH BI- PARTING REMOTE SYSTEM ENTRY GATE WITH PILASTER COLUMNS DETAIL B CM 19' S0. ---- -� PRECAST 8 LLNOSE PIER -CAP - COLOR TO BE SELECTED 13Y j� OWNER TYPICAL FENCE STYLE - I OWNER TO SELECT STYLE 2' 1 3.98' I J� �7R 16X16 PIER BLOCKS 5' NATURAL STONE VENEER FINISH TO MATCH 2' HOUSE'S STONE VENEER 1214 X 8l CMU BLOCKS $3 STIRRUPS 012' O.0 NATURAL STONE VENEER FINISH TO MATCH 1 _ HOUSE'S STONE VENEER #4 REE ® 18' 0.0 I I ______ _ _ ___y 1 4 -04 VERTICAL BARS CONCRETE FOOTING 24X36' DEEP L _ -7-it - J CONCRETE FOOTING 24•X36" DEEP LOW ENTRY FRONT FENCE /WALL DETAIL D TUBULAR STEEL PICKETS. 1- SO.. / 16 GA. EQUALLY SPACED WITHIN TUBULAR STEEL POST. 2- SO.. 14 CA WITH STEEL CAPS WELDED TO POST / PANELS. SLOPE TO MATCH CURBWALL I I TUBULAR STEEL RAILS. - i' - 6' SEE PLANS TOP AND BOTTOM. 2- SQ_ tb GA 3 1/4 - MAX FOR +E T-7 BETWEEN PICKETS CM PICKET - SELF CLOSING HINGES, SOMMER MODEL NO 4010 -6 OR APPROVED EQUAL MP). P.C.C. PAVING CAST -IN -PLACE WALL CAP 4- THICK X 12' WIDE - COLOR_ TO BE SELCTED 13Y OWNER ABUT TO DUST. - FENCE POST - ANCHOR BOLT TO PIER 19' S0. 4' 3' I I I I I I GATE STYLE 1 BY OWNER I HOE IM11 S4�VVEERT. BARS 0 _I __r 16' O.0 CONCRETE FOOTING - 24•X36• DEEP - A STUCCO WALL WITH PILAST TUBULAR STEEL PICKETS. 1" SO_ 16 GA. EQUALLY SPACED WITHIN PANELS. SLOPE TO MATCH CURBWALL - 6' SEE PLANS BETWEEN PICKETSR SPrE SUBGRADE COMPACTED J 10' \ 4. OF GRAIN ROCK TO 90% C ACTED J 10 \ I. OF GRAIN ROCK TO 9= REUTNE DENS- DENSITY FRONT ELEVATIO SECTIO N FRONT ELEVATION NOTES: 1, CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER, 2. ALL METAL SURFACES INVOLVED SHALL BE THROUGHLY CLEANED PRIOR TO APPLICATION OF PALM OR OTHER SURFACE TREATMENTS. ALL METAL PARTS SHALL BE PRIMED WTFH 2 COATS OF - RUSTOLEUM- OR APPROVED EQUAL AND RECEIVE TWO (2) COATS OF FLAT BLACK PAINT. 3. ALL WELDS SHALL BE CLEANED WITH NO SHARP EDGES AND BURRS AND SHALL ' BE GROUND FOR SMOOTHNESS FOR APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. D r 42" HIGH STEEL' POOL FENCE WITH SELF CLOSING GATE NATURAL STONE VENEER FINISH TO MATCH LENCTH VARIES SEE 19' SO HOUSE STONE VENEER FINISH � 8" PLAN FOR WIDTH PRECAST BULLNOSE PIER -CAP COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY H -- V"URN OWNER 0 R EBAR 3' IRRIGATION SUPPLY LINE 0 18" O.C. -- - - - - -- FOR URN POT ON TOP - T CUSTOM WROUGHT POT BY OWNER n 8" 2' -6" I IRON FENCING -FENCE STYLE SELECTED BY %3 STIRRUPS 012' O.0 FINISHED GRADE CONC. PLANTER OWNER 6X16 PIER BLOCKS WALL -------- - - - - -- NATURAL STONE VENEER FINISH TO MATCH - e" I l I I HOUSE STONE VENEER FINISH v 2X4 KEY C 1- CONCRETE FOOTING- 1 4 -#4 VERTICAL DARS it I I 181(24 DEEP I I N �4 REBAR L___J ® 18" O.C. NOTE: 1. CUSTOM WROUGHT FENCE SHALL BE fI i INSTALLED TO PIER PER CUSTOM FENCE CO.'S RECOMMENDATIONS. E FRONT WROUGHT IRON FENCE /PIER DETAIL CF 3' HIGH RAISED FRONT PLAN I I I I I I PRECAST BULLNOSE PIER -CAP COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY OWNER --- {-- -�vSUT TO EXISTING HOUSE PIER BLOCKS L STONE VENEER FINISH TO MATCH STONE VENEER FINISH RRUPS ol2. OX VERTICAL BARS R COLUMNS DETAIL RECASE BULLNOSED ALL CAP, COLOR TO BE LECTED BY OWNER TER SOIL WATERPROOFING S MEMBRANE A" IRRIGATION SUPPLY LINE -1 II" DRAIN LINE " dNCRETE FOOTING 12" X 18" DEEP RI DETAIL REVISIONS BY 2nd rev sed rC plans:t %14 0 N Q J U - O Q) U C Q] U) Q) ry (n -n` WQ) C -�� 00 O o_ g Q� 60 %I\ Q0 Ln Q) U --C) 0 C CU Q) _ QvT O Lid o 0 0 �cn CHECKED YL DATE 1- 4- SCALE NTS JOB NO. SHEET L-2 OF SHEETS V__� is • Item 2 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Application No. /Location: PDR07 -0010 — 13414 Surrey Lane (address changed to 13426 Surrey Lane) Type of Application: Design Review to construct a new two -story home Owner: Lu Staff Planner: Shweta Bhatt, Associate Planner Meeting Date: March 26, 2008 APN: 503 -16 -017 Department Head. John Livingstone, AICP T �3E• / w. �v SI .. C `��� qj .. ./ 'ip. ' IV A • .q �mtr: 1 r ¢I ^ W w q i q�. F u w gl 47 A 6 3B 49 4F �„CT.'TM U" , Z m 17 1 Ile 1 41 se s! i 26 st ? e _ •N aE a3 '� 4 ANE �64 .30 -w..r. 57 2s r- 0.055 ALL •It 63 60 N 6 —3a _ w 4 I 6 z �'• ff Subject: 13414 Surrey Lane (changed to 13426 Surrey Lane) APN: 503 -16 -017 500' Radius 13414 Surrey Lane (address changed to 13426 Surrey Lane) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CASE HISTORY: Application filed: 10/16/07 Application complete: 02/29/08 Notice published: 02/27/08 Mailing completed: 03/07/08 Posting completed: 03/20/08 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Design Review approval to demolish the existing 2,790 square foot home and construct a new two -story home. The proposed structure will be approximately 5,515 square feet and approximately 25 -feet 11- inches tall. The gross lot size is 47,480 square feet, and the site is zoned R -1- 40,000. Design Review is required pursuant to City Code section 15- 45.060. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the design review application with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. Staff is not recommending any permanent conditions of approval. • Page 2 of 7 • Application No. PDR07 -0010; 13414 Surrey Lane (address changed to 13426 Surrey Lane) STAFF ANALYSIS ZONING: R -1- 40,000 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Very Low Density Residential (RVLD) MEASURE G: Not Applicable PARCEL SIZE: Gross: 47,480 square feet; Net: 47,480 square feet SLOPE: Approximately. 19.8% average site slope GRADING REQUIRED: 427 cubic yards of cut and 356 cubic yards of fill. 71 cubic yards will be hauled off site. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed new single - family residence is, categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 of Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 ( "CEQA Guidelines "). This exemption allows for the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures and no exception to that exemption applies. MATERIALS AND COLORS: Materials and colors include beige stucco with cream trim and stone veneer on the exterior fagade. A colors and materials board is available on file with the Community Development Department and will be presented at the site visits' and public hearing. . Detail Colors and Material Mfg. & Specification Windows White Wood Anderson Satellite Front Door Natural Wood NBS N200 BDR Garage Door White Wood Amarr N8 Northham ton Roof Gray, Taupe, Brown Blend Eagle SHE8714 Stone Veneer Earthtone Eldorado Mountain Ledge Page 3 of 7 Application No. PDR07= 0010;13414 Surrey Lane (address changed to 13426 Surrey Lane) PROJECT DATA: R -1- 40,00,0 Zoning Proposed Required Net Site Area: 47,480 square feet Site Coverage Residence: 2,822 SF Garage: 662 SF Porch: 128 SF Maximum Allowable Paving and Swimming Pool: 10,677 SF = 16,618 SF (35 %) TOTAL Site Coverage 14,289 SF (30.09 %) Floor Area Maximum Allowable Proposed First Floor Area: 2,801 SF = 5,532-- - - Proposed Second Floor Area: _ 29018 SF SF (After slope Proposed Garage Area: 696 SF reduction of 19.8 %) TOTAL Proposed Floor Area 5,515 SF Set_ backs First Second First Second Floor Floor Floor Floor Front: 43 Feet. 43 Feet 30 Feet 3.0 Feet 3Inches 3Inches Rear:. 54 Feet 60 Feet 50 Feet 60 Feet 4 Inches Left Side: 49 Feet 63 Feet. 20.Feet 25 Feet 11 5 Inches Inches Right Side: 88 Feet 88 Feet 20 Feet 25 Feet 9Inches 9Inches Height Lowest Elevation Point: 438.5 Maximum Height = Highest Elevation Point: 451.5 471 (26 Feet) Average Elevation Point: 445 Proposed Topmost Point: 470.9 (25 Feet 9 - Inches) Page 4 of 7 lr.� • Application No. PDR07 -0010; 13414 Surrey Lane (address changed to 13426 Surrey Lane) PROJECT DISCUSSION AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS The site is accessed directly from Surrey Lane. A driveway currently leads to an existing single family residence which will be demolished to accommodate the project. The proposed ,building pad is near the lowest portion of.the lot, as the southern part of property is substantially higher in. elevation. Many mature trees line the existing driveway and are interspersed throughout the lot. The proposed home is a two -story, approximately 5,515- square foot structure. The proposal meets or exceeds all setback requirements and has been situated on a portion of the lot that provides screening from neighboring properties and the street. The home will feature a beige stucco exterior with white trim and stone veneer accent on the facades. A three car garage with wooden carriage style garage doors is proposed. Trees — - The City Arborist has reviewed -the plans and provided a report for the proposed project. -- - - A total of twenty -six trees were inventoried for this project. Of these, 24 are protected by City ordinance. Initially, the project scope included the removal of eight ordinance size trees. However the design has been modified so that three trees will be removed. They include: #1 (Monterey pine), #2 (Coast live oak), and #13 (Monterey pine). The coast live oak is dead and the arborist has approved removal of the other two Monterey pines. Replacement trees equivalent in value to these will be required as a condition of approval. Tree fencing and a. tree bond equivalent to 100% of the value of the remainder of the protected trees will be required prior to issuance of City permits. Energy Efficiency The building pad is heavily shaded by mature trees, which will provide natural cooling in hot weather. A radiant heating system for the first floor is proposed in addition to energy saving windows, appliances and light bulbs. Neighbor Correspondence The applicants have contacted ten of their neighbors and three have returned the notification letters. One neighbor had a comment requesting that a fence along the eastern property line not be installed. A fence along that property line is not part of the proposal. The applicants have indicated that they will work with these neighbors to ensure that their comment will be fully addressed upon installation of fencing in the future. Staff has not received additional feedback as of the writing of this staff report. General Plan Findings The proposed project is consistent with all of the following General Plan Policies: Conservation Element Policy 6.0 — Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. The proposed project will be screened by mature trees that exist on the parcel. Additionally, the home is proposed to be earth -tone in color and has been situated on a portion of the lot that is Page 5 of 7 Application No. PDR07 -0010; 13414 Surrey Lane (address changed to 13426. Surrey Lane) lower in elevation.: The proposed materials are earth -tone in color and will compliment the rural atmosphere of Saratoga. Laird Use Element Policy S.0 — The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the Findings required for Design Approval. Design Review Findings The proposed project is consistent with all of the following Design Review findings stated in. City Code Section 15- 45.080: (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The project will not unreasonable- interfere- with-view- and- privacy- im that-mature -trees -line-two sides- of. the parcel and the house has been situated on the portion of the lot with a lower elevation. The home meets and in some cases substantially exceeds setback requirements. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. The majority of the site's mature landscaping will be maintained with this proposal. Three protected trees are proposed for removal, one of which is dead. The applicant's landscaping plans show at least 27 trees that will be planted. on the site. The overall topography of the site will remain the same. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. Three trees will require removal for'this project`. two Monterey pines and one Coast live oak. The two pines; have .a combined value of $4,080 and the Coast live oak has died and thus has a.value of $0. Replacement trees equivalent to those removed will be required and a bond equivalent to 100 % of the remaining trees will be required prior to issuance of City permits. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. The project meets this finding in that the home is well detailed and provides building articulation. Stone veneer on the fagade adds interest and assists in minimizing bulk. Also, the project has been located on the-portion of the site that is substantially lower in elevation than the remainder of the lot. (e) Compatible bulk and height. The home is similar in size to other homes in the vicinity and is not an unusual size for the lot size or the zoning district. Other two -story homes similar in. height exist in the vicinity of the project. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (f) Current grading and erosion control methods. The project is conditioned to conform to the City's current grading and erosion control standards. The project Page 6 of 7 • • • • • Application No. PDR07 -0010; 13414 Surrey Lane (address changed to 13426 Surrey Lane) is also conditioned to require detention of stormwater on site, to the maximum extent reasonably feasible. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to all of the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook as detailed in the findings above. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find this application exempt from CEQA and approve the application for Design Review with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached Resolution. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution of Approval. 2. Neighbor Notification templates. 3. Arborist Reports and tree fencing by City Arborist Kate Bear, dated November 19, 2007. 4. Affidavit of Mailing Notices, Public Hearing Notice, Mailing labels for project notification. 5. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A ". Page 7 of 7 m APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. Application No. PDR07 -0010 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA Lu; 13414 Surrey Lane (address changed to 13426 Surrey Lane) Demolition of existing residence and construction of new two -story home WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review to demolish the existing residence and construct an approximately 5,515 square -foot two -story home at 13414 Surrey Lane. The lot is situated in the R- 1- 40,000 zoning district and is approximately 47,480 net square feet in size; and , WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, the project, which proposes to construct a single - family dwelling is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures ", Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This Class 3 exemption applies to construction of a single - family home in an urbanized area; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application for design review approval, and the following findings specified in City Code Section 15- 45.080 and the City's Residential Design Handbook have been determingd: Conservation Element Policy 6.0 — Protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. The proposed project will be screened by mature trees that exist on the parcel. Additionally, the home is proposed to be earth -tone in color and has been situated on a portion of the lot that is lower in elevation. The proposed materials are earth -tone in color and will compliment the rural atmosphere of Saratoga. Land Use Element Policy 5.0 —The City shall use the design review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings. As conditioned, the application meets the Findings required for Design Approval. Design Review Findings The proposed project is consistent with all of the following Design Review findings stated in City Code Section 15- 45.080: (a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The project will not unreasonable interfere with view and privacy in that mature trees line two sides of Application PDR07 -0010 13414 Surrey Lane (address changed to 13426 Surrey Lane) Lu. the parcel and the house has been situated on the portion of the lot with a lower, elevation. The home meets and in some cases substantially exceeds setback requirements. (b) Preserve Natural Landscape. The majority of the site's mature landscaping will be maintained with this proposal. Three protected trees are proposed for removal, one of which is dead. The applicant's landscaping plans show at least 27 trees that will be planted on the site. The overall topography of the site will remain the same. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees.. Three trees will require removal for this project: two Monterey pines and one Coast live oak. The two pines have a combined value of $4,080 and the Coast live oak has died and thus has a value of $0. Replacement trees equivalent to those removed will be required and a bond equivalent to 100% of the remaining trees will be required prior to issuance of City - permits: This finding maybe made ii the affirmative. - (d) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. The project meets this finding in that the. home is well detailed and provides building articulation. Stone. veneer on the fagade adds interest and assists in minimizing bulk. Also, the project has been. located on the portion of the site that .is substantially lower in elevation than the remainder of the lot. (e) Compatible bulk and height. The home is similar in size to other homes in the vicinity and is not an unusual size for the lot size or the zoning district. Other I wo -story homes similar in height exist in the vicinity of the project. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (f) Current grading and erosion control methods. The project is conditioned to conform to the City's current grading and erosion control standards. The project is also conditioned to require detention of stormwater on site, to the maximum extent reasonably feasible. This finding may be made in the affirmative. (g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to the applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook as described in the findings above. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, plans and other exhibits submitted in connection with this matter, application number PDR07 -0010 for Design Review Approval is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: Application PDR07 -0010 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 13414 Surrey Lane (address changed to 13426 Surrey Lane) Lu 1. The proposed home shall be constructed as shown on Exhibit "A" incorporated by reference. 2. A maximum of one wood - burning fireplace shall be permitted. 3. Four sets of complete construction plans incorporating this Resolution shall be included on the plans submitted to the Building Division for permit plan check review. 4. Final landscape, irrigation and utility plans shall be incorporated into the construction plan set and shall take into account the following requirements: • Landscape plan shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff, promote surface infiltration and minimize use of fertilizers and pesticides that can contribute to water pollution. • Where feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. • Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. • Existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plan to the maximum extent possible. • A note shall be included on the site plan stating that no construction equipment or private vehicles shall park or be stored within the dripline of any ordinance protected trees on the site. 5. Any changes to the approved plans must be submitted in writing with a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. No downgrading in the exterior appearance of the approved residence will be approved by staff. Downgrades may include but are not limited to garage doors, architectural detailing, stonework, columns, shutters, driveway materials, etc. Proposed changes to the approved plans are subject to the approval of the Community Development Director and may require review by the Planning Commission. Application PDR07 -0010 13414 Surrey. Lane (address changed to 13426 Surrey Lane) Lu 6. The site plan shall contain a note with the following language: "Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the LLS of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per the approved plans.'' 7. A storm water retention plan indicating how storm water will be retained on -site to the maximum . extent feasible, and incorporating the New Development and Construction — Best Management Practices, shall be submitted along with the complete construction drawings. If all storm water cannot be retained on -site due to topographic, soils or other constraints, an explanatory note shall be provided on the plan. 8. Water and/or runoff from the project site shall not be directed toward the adjacent properties. 9. All processing fees, in the form of deposit accounts on file with the community development department, shall be reconciled with a minimum $500 surplus balance at all times. In the event that the balance is less than $500, all staff work on the project shall cease until the balance is restored to a minimum of $500. CITY ARBORIST. .10. All recommendations contained in the City Arborist Report dated November 19, 2007 shall be followed. 11. Tree protective measures, as specified by the City Arborist, shall be installed and inspected by Staff prior to issuance of City Permits. . 12. Prior to issuance of City Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City, in a form acceptable to the Community Development Director, security equivalent to 100% of the value of all protected trees. to guarantee the maintenance and preservation of trees. 13. The City Arborist shall inspect the site to verify compliance with tree protective measures. The bond shall be released after the planting of required replacement trees, a favorable site inspection by the City Arborist, and payment of any outstanding Arborist fees. FIRE DEPARTMENT 14. The applicant shall comply with all Fire Department conditions. • • Application PDR07 -0010 13414 Surrey Lane (address changed to 13426 Surrey LaAe) Lu CITY ATTORNEY 15. Applicant agrees to hold City harmless from all costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by the City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City's defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City's action with respect to the applicant's project. Section 2. Construction must commence within thirty -six (36) months or approval will expire. Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other Governmental entities must be met. Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15 -90 of the Saratoga City Code, this resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission, State of California, on the 26th day of March 2008 by the following roll call vote: AYES: i NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: L` Joyce Hlava Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: John F. Livingstone, AICP Secretary, Planning Commission 'r Application PDR07 -0010 13414 Surrey Lane (address changed to 13426 Surrey Lane) Lu This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The .undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning Commission. Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date • • V� Attachment, 2 City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form . (,- , n ip PROJECT ADDRESS: % 4-2 / ^ li j OCT R, 2001 Dear Neighbor, 01 T 1' CF StiRATG�r, �" OMM" NI T Y D= VELQPMEENT I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity, to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of'the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself'with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and maybe changed as the project moves forward.. You may contact the City of S'aratoga's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur: The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by. each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City'of Saratoga. at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I a aware of the proposed project and have reviewed am the preliminary project plans.. . Neighbor Name: E� �Lf�NGN c Date: 9/$d�UG7 z'o1 ES' signature: C:�f Neighbor Address: SA 'OAT06iq_ �,4 x,5470 Neighbor Phone #: C'���) 8G7-77Z If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Our family has lived at 13440. Surrey Lane for over 32 years. Our. lot shares its western -most boundary with the eastern -most boundary of 13426 Surrey Lane (the proposed construction site). We have enjoyed unencumbered views of the western hills for many years. These views greatly contribute to the intrinsic value of our property. The only concern that we have with the.proposed construction is that it not include the building of a fence that will interfere with our western views. Applicant Name: � ��n ✓�� �� �--+� Date: ! /'Z L 2-c*0 7 Application Number: City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 • • • • City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: =F'r%r ' C_:;. Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga's Planning Division at. any time to review any changes that . may occur.. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have fiuther interest in the project, you'may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. , D My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: m Vile A?, Date: Signature: X A.,111t ' "2k,-, Neighbor Address: (-,A U ff 2?d Neighbor Phone #: /4 0'K - &i — 61 01 If I have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (grease attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name' YC - o) fir, t Date: (� - 2'1 2-C C' 7 Application Number: City of Saratoga Revised 10129106 Planning Department City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: T _'�L "w e y L�.; 0r Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. 1 ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and maybe changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga 's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that _may.occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be Advised that these plans are-preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project,: you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 - 868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: f `/ d��l� �tDate: Signature: Neighbor Address:' Neighbor Phone If I have any initial concerns: with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: 1� _ Lv� o L N Date: Mt ! L' Application Number: City of Saratoga Planning Department Revised 10124106 • • • • C, Att 1 14 Community Development Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, California 95070 13414 Surrey Lane /13426 Surrey Lane ARBORIST REPORT APN 503 -16 -017 Owner: Yen -Wen Yu and Woan Yu yu INTRODUCTION Application #: ARB07 -0032, PDR07 -0010 November 19, 2007 Prepared by Kate Bear, City Arborist Phone (408) 868 -1276 The property owners of 13414 (13426) Surrey Lane have submitted plans to the city to demolish their.. house and build a new single family home on the property. They also provided an arborist report from Econo Tree Service Inca which included an inventory of the trees on the property: No map showing.tree locations was provided with the report. Twenty six trees potentially. impacted by construction were inventoried for this report. Each tree was tagged for ease of identification with a square aluminum tag by Econo Tree Service. Data for each tree is included in a Tree Inventory Table at the end of this report. Tree locations are marked on the attached copy of the Site Plan. Plans reviewed for this report include Sheets A.0, Cover Sheet and Sheet A.1, Survey, dated October 8, by LHC Design. Lancisc4pe drawings were created by Laaav vesign tlroup ana incivae bneei L- 1.0, Landscape Concept and Sheet L -2.0, Plant List, Notes, Legend, dated October 12, 2007. Civil drawings include Sheets C.0, Title Sheet, 2. 1, Grading Plan and 3. 1, Utility Plan dated September 24, 2007 by Luzuriaga Taylor Inc., Civil Engineers, Land Surveyors. SITE OBSERVATIONS, PLAN REVIEW AND TECHNICAL DISCUSSION Twenty six trees potentially impacted by construction were inventoried by Econo.Tree Service for this project. Of these 24 are protected by City Ordinance. They include seven Monterey pines ( #1, 13, 18, 19, 21, 23 and 25), six coast live oaks ( #2 -'4, 7, 11 and 26), five redwoods ( #6, 8 - 10 and 12); one London plane (# 14),_ three deodar cedars ( #15 —17) and two Chinese elms ( #20 and 24). One Chinese pistache ( #5) and one Chinese elm ( #22) are not protected by City ordinance. Trees #1, 2, 4, 7 9, 12 and 13 are proposed for removal on the plans. Tree #2 is a dead coast live oak and may removed during construction. No replacement for this tree is required. It is not clear if trees #21 and 23 are proposed for removal. The grading and utility plans show these two trees marked for removal, but the landscape and site plans do not. It is acceptable to remove these two Monterey pines that are in decline and crowd other, more suitable trees for the site and replace them following construction. Trees #1 and 13 are Monterey pines. The driveway is proposed only three feet from tree #1 and would necessitate the cutting of major roots 'in order to install. Because this tree, although large, has a noticeable lean and is in only fair health, it, is acceptable to remove it to accommodate the driveway and replace it following construction. Tree #13 is also in fair health and will be significantly impacted by the proposed Page 1 of 4 13414 Surrey Lane/13426 Surrey'Lane patio in that major roots will need to be cut to install the new patio. It is acceptable to remove this tree and replace it following construction. Trees #4 and 7 are coast live oaks in good condition. Trees #8, 9 and 12 are redwoods in good condition. These five trees should be retained during construction and the project designed to accommodate them. No excavation should occur within 12 feet of trees #4 and 7 or within 5 feet of trees #8, 9 and 12. The retaining wall next to tree #4 may be removed and up to 4 inches of soil added to the area where the wall is removed. Otherwise, no changes in grade should occur under the canopies of trees 44 or 7. Some smaller redwoods grow near to tree # 12 and are not protected by city ordinance. I recommend removing one of the smaller trees if necessary to accommodate the landscape. An island in the driveway is proposed around oak tree #3, providing approximately 9 feet of space for the roots on all sides of the tree. A storm drain is shown about a foot from the trunk of the tree. The storm drain will cut through about 50% of the root system. If the driveway and storm drain are constructed as proposed, this tree will be seriously compromised. The impact to the root system is too great for the tree to sustain and survive. I recommend that the driveway be designed so that it goes around no more than two sides of the tree, and the storm drain be redesigned so that it comes no closer than 15 feet to the tree. Materials for the driveway should be pervious,' such as pavers on sand, and the driveway should be constructed entirely on top of existing grade within 20 feet of the trunk of the tree. No fill soil should be added within 20 feet of the'tree and no excavation should occur within 15 feet of the tree. The pool patio is proposed approximately three feet from the trunk of tree #11, a coast live oak in good condition. The design for this area should be adjusted so that no grade changes orexcavation occur within 15 feet of the tree's trunk. storm drain is to tree #12 w tree. shown to be removed on the drawings, it is a redwood in good condition. I recommend drainage around the tree at a minimum distance of five feet from the trunk. tree is ina the Tree #14 is a London plane tree in good health. It will be significantly impacted by the patio area that is about four feet from the tree and also by a storm drain and rock dissipater that are about five feet from the tree on the other side of it. To construct the patio, storm drain and dissipater as shown, many of the roots supporting and feeding the tree would need to be cut, resulting in destabilization of the tree. Instead, I recommend redesigning the project so that no grade changes or excavation occurs within 10 feet of this tree for the patio, storm drain or dissipater. The patio under tree #14 should be designed of pervious, materials, such as pavers on sand, rather than concrete. Per City Ordinance 1.5- 50.080, a bond amount of $82,610, which is equal to 100% of the total appraised value of trees #3, 4, 6 — 12, 14 — 17, 19, 20, 24 — 26, is required. Appraisal values are calculated according to the Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9rh Edition, published by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), 2000. RECOMMENDATIONS 0 1. This entire report, including the Tree Inventory Table and the attached map showing locations of trees, shall be incorporated into the set of final building plans. Page. 2 of 4 13414 Surrey Lane/13426 Surrey Lane 2. Tree protective fencing shall be installed as shown on the attached map and established prior to any grading or the arrival of construction equipment or materials on site. It,shall be comprised of six -foot high chain link fencing mounted on eight -foot tall, two -inch diameter galvanized posts; driven 24 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet apart. Once established,. the. fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout construction until final inspection. Tree protective fencing shall be inspected and approved by the City Arborist prior to obtaining building division permits. 3. Owner shall provide a tree protection bond, in the amount of $82,610, prior to obtaining building division permits. The bond shall remain in place for the duration of the construction project to ensure the protection of the trees. Once the project has been completed and inspected by the City. Arborist, the bond can be released. 4.. Trees #I and 13 are in conflict with the proposed construction and tree #2 is dead. Trees #21 and #23 are in decline and- -crowding other more suitable trees. Tree #25 is in poor health-and crowded by tree the adjacent tree. It is acceptable to remove and replace these trees following construction. New trees equal to $6,580 shall be planted to replace these trees. Replacement values for trees can, be found at the bottom of the Tree Inventory Table attached to this report. 5. No grade changes or excavation shall occur within the following distances of trees.: a. 15 feet of oak trees #3 or 11 :b. 12 feet of oak trees #4 and 7 and deodar cedars #15, 16 and 17 c. 10 feet of London plane #14 d. .5 -feet of redwoods #8, 9 and 12 6. The -storm drain and rock dissipaters shall be redesigned to meet the necessary setbacks from trees as listed in #5 above. 7.. The driveway, patio and pool :decking shall be of pervious materials, such as pavers on sand, under tree canopies and shall be constructed entirely on top of grade where they occur -under tree canopies. 8. All construction activities must be conducted outside the designated fenced area (even after fencing is. removed). These activities include,' but are not necessarily limited to, the following: demolition, grading, trenching, equipment cleaning, stockpiling and dumping materials (including soil- fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 9. No trenching for utilities or drainage is permitted inside of the fenced area around trees without . prior approval from City Arborist (call Kate Bear at (408) 868- 1276). Utilities include electrical, drainage, water, sewer, gas and landscape irrigation. If trenching is approved, roots measuring two inches or larger shall be retained and tunneled underneath. Roots measuring less than two inches may be cut with a sharp' pruning instrument. 10. Any pruning of trees on site must be performed by a licensed tree contractor under the supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist and according to ISA standards. Page 3 of 4 • 13414 Surrey Lane /13426 Surrey -Lane 11. The disposal of harmful products, including but not limited to, chemicals, paint rinse water, fuel, cement rinse water, herbicides, or other materials, is prohibited beneath tree canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath tree canopies. Attachments: Tree Bond Form Tree Inventory Table Map Showing Tree Protective Fencing Locations • t Page 4 of 4 tREE INVENTORY TABLE November 19, 2007 13414 Surrey Lane • Monterey pine b u o II o o a Y Y b 1 Pinus rdiataa .� 0 o o Fair Cd ,., U o $2,940 Coast live oak 11.3, 0 rn co 2 Quercus a ri olia 0 as a U b 3 G 3 G "0 � �� 3 0¢ W Coast live oak 12.3, b c II `" II U c o .0 3 0 n 3 _ Quercus a ri olia 19.3. 40 80 80 Good High x $13,500- - TREE Coast live oak ti � h II U� NO. TREE NAME H C7 w 0 x� .n > O x S :. .� A Z . a $3,690 November 19, 2007 13414 Surrey Lane • Monterey pine 1 Pinus rdiataa 36 35 50 25 Fair Moderate $2,940 Coast live oak 11.3, 2 Quercus a ri olia 12.9 20 0 0 Dead $0 Coast live oak 12.3, 3 _ Quercus a ri olia 19.3. 40 80 80 Good High $13,500- - Coast live oak 4 Quercus a ri olia 13.2 25 80 80 Good High $3,690 Chinese pistache 5 Pistacia chinensis 7 Not protected b city ordinance. $0 .' Redwood 5, 8, 6 Sequoia sem ervirens 12,12 25 80 80 Good High $8,300 Coast live oak 7 Quercus a rifolia 15.6 25 80 80 Good High $5,100 Redwood Sequoia sem ervirens Good High $2,620 Redwood ' 9 Sequoia sem ervirens 8.9 10 80 80 Good High $1,410 Redwood 10 Se uoia sem ervirens 8:6 12 80 80 Good High $1,320 Coast live oak 5.8, I 1 Quercus a ri olia 12.4 30 80 80 Good High $4,920 Redwood 12 Sequoia sem ervirens 8.7 15 90 90 Good High $1,520 Monterey pine 13 Pinus rdiataa 20.6 25 50 70 Fair Moderate $1,140 London plane 14 Platanus aceri olla 15:6 35 80 70 Good High $3,720 Deodar cedar 15 Cedrus deodara 22.5 35 80 80 Good High $10,100 Deodar cedar 16 Cedrus deodara 24.7 30 80 80 Good High $9,000 F-17 I Deodar cedar Cedrus deodara 19.8 35 80 80 Good High $7,800 November 19, 2007 13414 Surrey Lane • 4 ,<'KEE INVENTORY TABLE Total Appraised Value $90,370 C7 Replacement Tree Values 15 gallon = $150 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 48 inch box = $5,000 52 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 Should any tree listed above become damaged owner will be required to repair the damage. Should any tree listed above be removed owner will be required to replace that tree with trees equa] in value to its assessed value. November 19, 2007 13414 Surrey Lane Monterey pine u 18 Pinus rdiataa 23.8 40 40 50 Fair Low 0 $1,180 Monterey pine Q ] U a 0 .. a ° 19 Pinus rdiataa 14.3 oz ° o own c Fair a $410 Chinese elm >r a co a 'e U j 20 b7mus arvifolia 9.8 .o o �� �I U o ° 3 0 'n Monterey pine A 4 .a TREE Pinus rdiataa y 25 O O Cd ± q o 00 4 �C $710 NO. TRE NAME y a > O 22 q A Total Appraised Value $90,370 C7 Replacement Tree Values 15 gallon = $150 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 48 inch box = $5,000 52 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 Should any tree listed above become damaged owner will be required to repair the damage. Should any tree listed above be removed owner will be required to replace that tree with trees equa] in value to its assessed value. November 19, 2007 13414 Surrey Lane Monterey pine 18 Pinus rdiataa 23.8 40 40 50 Fair Low $1,180 Monterey pine 19 Pinus rdiataa 14.3 25 1 40 40 Fair Low $410 Chinese elm 20 b7mus arvifolia 9.8 40 50 50 Fair. High $1,260 Monterey pine 21 Pinus rdiataa 19.6' 25 40 40 Fair Low $710 Chinese elm 22 Ulmus arvifolia Sprouts from a s - not protected b ordinance. $0 Monterey pine 23 Pinus rdiataa 26.3 40 50 50 Fair Moderate $1,790 Chinese elm 9.3, 4 1 Ulmus arvi olia 10.9 1 35 60 60 Good High $3,960 Monterey pine 25 Pinus rdiataa 10 10 10 20 Poor Low $0 Coast live oak 8.9, ' 26 Coast live oak 10.2 30 80 60 Good Hi $3,980 Total Appraised Value $90,370 C7 Replacement Tree Values 15 gallon = $150 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 48 inch box = $5,000 52 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 Should any tree listed above become damaged owner will be required to repair the damage. Should any tree listed above be removed owner will be required to replace that tree with trees equa] in value to its assessed value. November 19, 2007 13414 Surrey Lane 13414 Surrey La WW/ • 136•. � I� TFiUij�' ' •.# , ,,./'' i ^`\ � }NRA .. 6�TD'- - .�.: t,\ ..i \•� _, WE ,2nl. `M4E ORw� 4i3� 1"A wC, eou"rNTSloes °s uD 6 + ,q[P I n +'v,9 \ \\ \• `i\ ) r3c �:'•. "'` 8011- WOMEN ♦• i _ r 1 t 2 � C\ N' \ - �� yY r� y-- �9; .\lun• .. � _ � 1 kli T � ►g.tq ) .yy� \\ ! � ^ \\ ' } i �'�"� w •„ v-( • r •.rn. 1.4 ' 1, • \ \�\ \ \1\ i4 +8.5 q is Fi• C f f1.0.0 \\ TE EAD �f.q 'tl q�i"li� • `r', 4'�• P s 1 d„ ,+ S ` P p BOl P \ , r \ • \.. 11. vvv vvvvvv � \.,t .'n qEl qq !R� 1 1 1 4 it rla ++37U q+. r. . 8q �• •n _ �.. ' 1'__�� ._ cal hp �. n - 3'•+. \ .i G U4D - _ • • • •... _ r4 •� 7 A lL On5' —E OAK wnhL NnX•5'•T .0 J �.�.. E. � c ncnou., — E irsyl• ii � +61 b - - - - .� � ' '4. r,tl 5a :� - • • � u+rlDe �i tin •cA1'P4 °' ._ Si!A erou, - •i ' iJ'{ITg c{,ev rW Qe'ti -+ +:� ti3 • _ • q�g43 _ � R v''QcscE GFSK y, L , �b g4l4L nnro _ q vv w1 •. a� + +7 u3 CP SSE& . '[cu. cOASI iuowo 59 E Qf wblyi a:. WAL. w = F[ o ♦.. _ _ 0't P TRFrfS I a :c » »Dp • 1 •F°:t "' E'P :µ{•:. - 6PP& PATIO s EiReaE uA , . ' • Isa " ' psi P ' LOW REWPLNC WtLC70' 11CN \ — v - 2 BENCHES w/ • • - E h y' FLOWCRWD CNERRV - a O•_ •_ 0°vV VOvvvpo y~• •vvv TREES BEH.D ';ovvvvdvavvvvvvv� vvv° 'vv 't• ' ' O• • °° v vavvvv vvv vve -vIv v ' 1�' qi'[,.+ _ •4.• �_• v9,!.vvv °pc. - ` i W nbglq n6 °, 5,GC • • •.• • 11gq � '_ &� r.f. ..,.�.. _.w.,....,... _ .._ _. .: _ �. ..- _ -%"Icn . ` Z IRU • 136•. � I� TFiUij�' ' •.# , ,,./'' i ^`\ � }NRA .. 6�TD'- - .�.: t,\ ..i \•� _, WE ,2nl. `M4E ORw� 4i3� 1"A wC, eou"rNTSloes °s uD 6 + ,q[P I n +'v,9 \ \\ \• `i\ ) r3c �:'•. "'` 8011- WOMEN ♦• i _ r 1 t 2 � C\ N' \ - �� yY r� y-- �9; .\lun• .. � _ � 1 kli T � ►g.tq ) .yy� \\ ! � ^ \\ ' } i �'�"� w •„ v-( • r •.rn. 1.4 ' 1, • \ \�\ \ \1\ i4 +8.5 q is Fi• C f f1.0.0 \\ TE EAD �f.q 'tl q�i"li� • `r', 4'�• P s 1 d„ ,+ S ` P p BOl P \ , r \ • \.. 11. vvv vvvvvv � \.,t .'n qEl qq !R� 1 1 1 4 it rla ++37U q+. r. . 8q �• •n _ �.. ' 1'__�� ._ cal hp �. n - 3'•+. \ .i G U4D - _ • • • •... _ r4 •� 7 A lL On5' —E OAK wnhL NnX•5'•T .0 J �.�.. E. � c ncnou., — E irsyl• ii � +61 b - - - - .� � ' '4. r,tl 5a :� - • • � u+rlDe �i tin •cA1'P4 °' ._ Si!A erou, - •i ' iJ'{ITg c{,ev rW Qe'ti -+ +:� ti3 • _ • q�g43 _ � R v''QcscE GFSK y, L , �b g4l4L nnro _ q vv w1 •. a� + +7 u3 CP SSE& . '[cu. cOASI iuowo 59 E Qf wblyi a:. WAL. w = F[ o ♦.. _ _ 0't P TRFrfS I a :c » »Dp • 1 •F°:t "' E'P :µ{•:. - 6PP& PATIO s EiReaE uA , . ' • Isa " ' psi P ' LOW REWPLNC WtLC70' 11CN \ — v - 2 BENCHES w/ • • - E h y' FLOWCRWD CNERRV - a O•_ •_ 0°vV VOvvvpo y~• •vvv TREES BEH.D ';ovvvvdvavvvvvvv� vvv° 'vv 't• ' ' O• • °° v vavvvv vvv vve -vIv v ' 1�' qi'[,.+ _ •4.• �_• v9,!.vvv °pc. - ` i W nbglq n6 °, 5,GC • • •.• • 11gq � '_ &� r.f. ..,.�.. _.w.,....,... _ .._ _. .: _ �. ..- _ -%"Icn . ` Z IRU • M • Attachment 4'' • City of Saratoga Y Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 408 - 868 -1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Saratoga's Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on Wednesday, the 26`h day of March 2008, at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Theater, located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. The public hearing agenda item is stated below. Details of this item are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. Please consult the City website at www.saratoga.ca.us regarding Friday office - closures. APPLICATION /ADDRESS: #PDR07 -0010 — 13414 Surrey Lane .(Address changed. to 13426 Surrey Lane) APPLICANT /OWNER: Lu APN: 503 -16 =017 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests Design Review approval to demolish the existing home and construct a new two -story home. The proposed structure will be approximately 5,515 square feet and approximately 25 -feet 11- inches tall. The gross lot size is 47,480 square feet, and the site is zoned. R -1- 40,000. Design Review is required pursuant to City Code , section 15- 45.060. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. In order. to be- ,included in the Planning Commission's information packets, written communications should be filed no later. than Monday, March 17, 2008. A site visit-will be held on the day preceding the hearing date listed above as part of the standard Site Visit Committee agenda. Site visits occur between 3:30 and 5:00 p.m. The site visit is open to the public. The Site Visit Committee will convene at the City Hall parking lot at 3:30 p.m. on the day.preceding the hearing and visit the site listed above and may visit other sites as well. For more information please contact the Community Development Department at 408 868 -1222 or review the Site Visit Agenda on the City Website at www.sarato2a:ca.us. This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor's office annually,, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases,.out -of -date information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all residents potentially affected by a project. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that - everyone in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Shweta Bhatt Associate Planner sbhatt(&,sarato ag_ ca.us (408) 868 -1266 • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICES I, Denise Kaspar I being duly sworn, deposes and says: that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years; that acting for the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on the 7th day of March , 2008, that I deposited 48 Notices in the United States Post Office, a NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto, with postage thereon prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses shown, to- wit: _ (See list attached hereto and made part hereof) that said persons are the owners of said property who are entitled to a Notice of Hearing pursuant to Section 15- 45.060(b) of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Saratoga in that said persons and their addresses are those shown on the most recent equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Santa Clara as being owners of property within 500 feet of the property described as: ' APN: 503 -16 -017 Address: 13414 Surrey Lane that on said day there was regular communication by United States Mail to the addresses shown above. Denise Kaspar` Advanced Listing Services March 7, 2008 500' Ownership Listing Prepared For: 503 -16 -017 LU YEN -WEN & YU W 13414 SURREY LANE SARATOGA CA 95070 503 -15 -019 GWENDOLYN BONNET OR CURRENT OWNER 1407 S BLAKE RD SPOKANE VALLEY WA 99216 -0431 503 -16 -003 .HSIAO -CHIN WANG 13425 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4243 503 -16 -006 MALHOTRA 13750 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4239 503 -16 -009 SESTRIERE LLC 13605 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 4258 503 -16 -012 503 -16 -013 ROY & ANGELA EVULICH RUDY Y JUANG ` 13616 SURREY LN 13600 SURREY LN . SARATOGA CA 950704257 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4257 503 -16 -015 KRISTIN V & MINOO BAKKE 13540 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4257 503-16 -001 KAY K & PAUL FIREMAN 13385 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4243 503 -16 -004 KENNETH K MUNSON 13455 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4243 503 -16 -007 KEN S & MEIYEE CHAN OR CURRENT OWNER 13561 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4216 503 -16 -010 CHUAN -JEN TSU 13625 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4258 503 -16 -018 LADONNIKOV 13388 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4217 503 -16 -016 CHARLES E & BLANCA JONES 13440 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4217 503 -16 -019 LILY CHANG 13386 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4217 503 -16 -002 KEN -SUE TAN 13405 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4243 503 -16 -005 JOHN W & BARBARA TREMOR 13525 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4216 503 -16 -008 CHU CHANG 13575 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4216 503 -16 -011 HENRY YEN 13630 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4257 503 -16 -014 LE HUE N 13570 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 950704257 503 -16 =017 LU YEN -WEN & YU W OR CURRENT OWNER 826 UNIVERSITY AVE LOS ALTOS CA 94024 -4634 503 -16 -020 GARY S & KELLY BERMAN 13360 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4217 503 -16 -022 503 -16 -023 503 -16 -024 MICHAEL & JOCELYN OSIER CHIN-LANG & JENNIFER JAN WALTER H SINGER' 13280 PIERCE RD 13270 PIERCE RD 13250 PIERCE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -4240 -SARATOGA CA 95070 -4240 SARATOGA CA 95070 -4240 503 -16 -025 BARBARA A MORRISSEY 13240 PIERCE RD TOGA CA 95070 -4215 503 -16 -055 RICHARD J & SUSAN HOLIC 13305 PIERCE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -4235 503 -16 -058 WILLIAM E & MARTHA THOMAS 13282 PIERCE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -4240 503 -16 -083 PRISCILLA SCHNEIDER 13291 PIERCE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -4235 503 -53 -046 CHARLES & LITA ASKANAS 13460 SARAVIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4849 503 -53 -049 . R L MOBILIO 20979 SARAVIEW CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -4820 503 -53 -052 TAE LEE 13545 SARAVIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4842 503 -66 -012 MARK B & THERESA CREAMER 21090 PADERO AVE SARATOGA CA 95070 -4268 . • 503 -16 -027 EAST ESTATES DRIVE PROPS LLC OR CURRENT OWNER 4741 CASTLEWOOD DR SAN JOSE CA 95129 -2254 503 -16 -056 DANNY G & KAREN FONG 13356 SURREY LN SARATOGA CA 95070 -4217 503 -16 -065 LEO S LUAN OR CURRENT OWNER 13204 PIERCE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -4215 503 -51 -014 GODFREY & SUZANNE SULLIVAN 13370 PIERCE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -4261 503 -53 -047 CHANG -HONG WU 20903 SARAVIEW CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -4820 503 -16 -053 BARRY W & BRENDA JONES 13251 PIERCE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -4235 503 -16 -057 JOHN C &HELEN MCCOLLUM 13290 PIERCE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -4240 503 -16 -082 JOHN E & DOROTHY TERRILL 13277 PIERCE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -4235 503 -53 -045 DANIEL J & JENNIFER FRAISL 13500 SARAVIEW DR SARATOGA CA 95070 -4849 503 -53 -048 GERALD & ESTHER DANIEL 20945 SARAVIEW CT SARATOGA CA 95070 -4820 503 -53 -050 503 -53 -051 POOROUSHASB & PARIMA PARINEH TIMOTHY GORSULOWSKY OR CURRENT OWNER 20958 SARAVIEW CT 50 FOX HILL RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -4820 WOODSIDE CA 94062 -4825 503 -66 -002 ROBERT H MAYER 13333 PIERCE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -4241 CITY OF SARATOGA ATTN: SHWETA BHATT 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE SARATOGA CA 95070 503 -66 -003 BRIAN BERNARD 13337 PIERCE RD SARATOGA CA 95070 -4241 Advanced Listing Services P.O. Box 2593 Dana Point CA 92624 LegalAdvertisin r blidotices g� — person'or by your attorney. California Building, Fire, All interested persons may said Notice of Default and Election to sell to be record- the Initial publication of the Notice of Sale. is fees, charges and expenses of the Trustee for the total . Notices IF YOU AREA CREC TOR or a contingent creditor of the Electrical, Mechanical and Plumbing Codes and amend appear and be heard at the above time and plate. If you 1 `6 �J II �illGG Sales ed in the .County where the real property is located. $677,069.01. It is possible- that at the time of sale the amount (at the time of the initial publication of the WON deceased, you must file your them to reflect local condi- challenge a decision of the Date: 3/1212008 opening bid ma be less Notice of Sale) reasonably claim with the court and mail a copy to the personal repre- lions in the City of Saratoga. The proposed ordinance Planning Commission .put- suant to a public hearing in TSG NO.: 3539470 First American Title Insurance Company than the total indebtedness due. In addition to cash, the estimated to be set forth below. The amount may be O TICS OF PETITION TO sentative appointed by the would generally retain the court, you may be limited to TS NO.: 20079077102642 First American Trustee will accept cashier's greater on the day of sale. MINISTER ESTATE ill T. STEINBERG court within four months date of first City's current regulations. It would update some regula• raising Doty those issues you Or someone else raised at FHA /VA /PMI NO.: NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE LoanStar Trustee Services checks drawn k, a state or bank, a check BENEFICIARY MAY ELECT TO BID LESS THAN THE TOTAL SE NO. 1-08-PR-262849 from the issuance of letters as provid- (ions, including those for the public hearings) YOU ARE IN DEFAULT 3 First American Way Santa Ana, CA 92707 national drawn by a state or federal AMOUNT DUE. Trustor(s): all heirs, beneficiaries, ditors, contingent credi• ed in section 9700 of the Probate Code. The earthquake safety and auto- n.lic fire sprinklers. described in the notice, or in written correspondence UNDER A DEED OF TRUST, DATED 10/11/2006 UNLESS First American Lobe be credit union, to a check drawn by a state or federal PETER. S HMIDT.PH S AND USA M. SCHMIDT, HUSBAND s, and persons who may ierwise be interested in California time or filing claims will not before four months The ordinance would also adopt an "Excavation and delivered to the Saratoga Planning Commission at, or YOU TAKE ACTION TO PRO. TER YOUR PROPERTY, IT act- Trustee Services may act- Ing as a debt collector a. savings and loan assocla• ton, savings assoclation, Or AND WIFE Recorded: 7/2/1992 in Instrument No. will or estate,,or both of expire from the hearing date Grading" Code to ensure the prior to, the public hearing. MAY BE SOLD AT A PUBLIC attempting to collect debt say ings bank specified in 11433458 in book•,page•of iNT.STEINBERG i N T. SN has been filed by N has been le noticed above: YOU MAY EXAMINE the file City retains its current valion and grading provi- In order to. be included in the Planning Commission's Infor• SALE. IF. YOU NEED AN EXPLANATION OF THE Arry information obtained will be used or that put- Section 5702 of the Financial Code and authorized to do Official Records in the office of the Recorder of SANTA .NCI I• the .NCY 1 Court H California, kept by the court If you are a person interested in the - lions. Finally, the proposed. ordinance would adopt a mation packets, written communications should be NATURE OF THE PROCEED• LNG AGAINST YOU, YOU s ?�?� OrfAuthortzed Agent sale will be modes nlansAS Dale of Salt: /18 /2008 rat only of Santa Clara. estate, you may file with the 'Repair and Reconstruction" filed on Or before the SHOULD CONTACT A Chet Sco ers— ForTrustee's y IS" condition, but without 11:00 AM Place of Sale: At E PETITION requests that NlY I• BLANCHARD be court'a formal Request for Special Notice of the filing of Code to ensure. that. dam- aged structures would be Tuesday, a week before the meeting. LgyyyE((, On 4/1/2008 at 10:00 AM Sale (nor Please Call covenant or warranty[ . Implied, regard. the North Market Street County pointed as personal repre• ntat'ne to administer the ve " an inventory andappraisalof :state assets or of any petl•. repaired to a structurally safe level _ _ _ Asitevisitwillbeheldonthe day _preceding the hearing First American Loanslar Trustee Services, as duly 965 P3723691965 (Pub SN3/12r3/19, 3/26) Ing title, ry the Courthouse. use. 90 sof - late the decedent lion or account as provided Copies of the 2007 date listed above as part of .appointedTruslee under and indebtedness sec d Amount unpaid balance E PETITION requests the in section 1250 of the California Building, the standard Site Visit pursuant to Deed of Trust NOTICE Of TRUSTEES SALE said Deed of Trust. advances and other charges: cedent's Will and codi• s, it any, be admitted.lo California Probate Code. A Request for. Special Notice .Plumbing. - Mechanical, Electrical and Fire Codes, the Committeeagenda. Site vis• its occur between 3:30 and recorded. 10/7812006, as Instrument No. 19146321, in T5 NO. 0747507 TITLE ORDER NO. G736823 thereunder, with Interest as provided, and the unpaid $151,387.54 The purported property address. s: 18433 lbate. The will and any dicils are available for form is.available from the proposed "Excavation and Grading" Code, the proposed 5:00 p.m. The site visit is open to the public. The Site book , Page , of Official Records in the once of the INVESTOR /INSURER NO. )rind al Of the Note secured VANDERBILT DR SARATOGA CA SARATOGA, CAS 94088 amitstiar in the fill kept court clerk.' Attorney for petitioner: a "Repair and Reconstruction" Visit Committee convene County Recorder of Santa 048252413 APN NO. 386-49-003 by said Deed of Trust with Interest thereon as provided . Assessors Parcel. No 403- . the court. IOlo IN Code and of the proposed at the City Hall arking lot at day Claro County, State of Executed by: YOU ARE IN DEFAULT in said Note, plus fees; 28 -017 The undersigned Ifablll• IE PETITION requests thority to administer the 342 STATE STREET, SUITE 1 LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 Ordinance are on file and open to public inspection at 3:30 p.m. on the preced• Ing the hearing and vsit the California. David I Torres, will sell at UNDER A DEED OF TRUST; DATED 1/02/2004. UNLESS charges and expenses-of the Trustee.and of the trusts cre- Trustee disclaims any ty for any incorrectness of fate under the Independent 650.948 -1096 the office of the City Clerk of site listed above and may public auction to highest YOU TAKE ACTION TO PRO- ated by said Deed of Trust. the property address , or (ministration of Estates Act. (Pub SN 3/5, 3/12,,3/19) the City of Saratoga, visit other sites as well. for bidder for cash, cashier's TECT YOUR PROPERTY, IT DATED: 3/05/2008 other common designation, his authority will allow the Saratoga City Hall, 13777 more information please check /cash equivalent or MAY BE SOLD AT A PUBLIC RECONTRUST COMPANY if any, shown herein. if no rsonal representative to ke many actions without approval. _ � I 0 g g Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070, during regular contact the Community Development Department at review the other form of payment authorized by 2924h(b), (payable at me of sale In SALE. IF YOU. NEED AN EXPLANATION OF THE 1757 TAPO CANYON ROAD, SVWSe SIMI VALLEY, street address or other corn- mon designation is shown, location of daining court :fore taking certain very _ gals business hours. /s /Cathleen Boyer, 408 868.1222 Or Site Visit Agenda on the lawful money of the United NATURE OF THE PROCEED- ING AGAINST YOU, YOU CA 93063 phone: (800) 2818219, directions to the the property may be PO rears[ actions, however, e personal representative fJiY OFSARATOGA City Clerk (pub SN 3/5 & 3/12) City Website at www.sarato- ga.ca.us. Slates) Sup for the entrance to the Su efor Courthouse, SHOULD CONTACT A LAWYER. - sale information (626) 927 4399 obtained by sending a writ- ten request to the bef eficia- II be required to give notice interested persons unless NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NOTICE OF HEARING APPLICATION ►PDR07 -0018 (389.30 -0IS) LEE; 18853 190 N. Market St., San lose, CA All right, title and interest Notice s hereby given that COMPANY, g Trustee's Sale Officer Y: RUST COMPANY Is a ry within 10 days of the date of first publication of this ey have waned notice or nsented to the proposed AMENDING CHAPTER 16 OF THE SARATOGA MUNICIPAL BEFORE PLANNING . COMMISSION ALLENDALE AVENUE: • The applicant requests Design conveyed to and now held by it under said Deed of Trust in t- duly appointed trustee put- duly appointed Dint suant to the Deed of Trust debt collector attempting debt c to collect a debt. Any mfor• Notice of Sale. n the Trustee is unable to convey title far tion.) The independent (ministration authority wilt CODE RELATING TO BUILD• CfTY OF SARATOGA'S PLANNING COMMISSION Review approval to remove an existing one story single. the property situated in said County and State described executed by MICHAEL D motion obtained will be used any reason, the successful bidder's sole and exclusive. !granted unless an interest• INGREGUULTKINSAND FIRESAFEI7 announces the following family residence and con- as: As more fully described SALOMAN, AND KAREN A SALOMAN, HUSBAND AND forthalpurpose. ASApi 986131 remedy shall be the return of I person files an objection the petition and shows NOTICE IS NEARBY GIVEN March public hearings an Wednesday, the 26th day.of strucl a. new approximately in the above mentioned WIFE AS JOINT. TENANTS, and (Pub SN 3/5, 3/12.3/9) monies paid to the Trustee, and the successful bidder rod cause why the court that at 7:00 p.m. on 19, 2008; in the Community March 2008 at 7:00 P•m• in single famile residence5with Y 050 The streeAaddress7and dated 0110212004 recorded 01/21/04, as NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE shall have . no. further could not grant the authori• Theater, Saratoga City Hall, the City. Council Chambers a proposed height of approx- other common designation. Instrdment No. 17578885, in TS 9 CA -07- 1142054F s recourse. . 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, located at 13777 Fruitvale imately 21 feet. The net lot if any, of the real property Book Page) of Official LOAN i 9169958650 Date: 2 /27/2008 HEARING on the petition III be held on APRIL 7, Saratoga, CA 95070, the City Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Details and plans are avail- size is approximately 92 acres. The site is zoned R•1- described above is purport- ed to be: 15560 On Orbit Dr, Record's in the office of the YOU. ARE IN DEFAULT UNDER A DEED OF TRUST Quality Loan Service Corp. 5th Avenue San Diego, )0B, 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 15 First St.; Council of the City of Saratoga will hold a public able . at the Saratoga 40,000 (Single Family Saratoga, CA 95070 The dis• County Recorder of Santa Clara Count State Of DATED 6/24/1992. UNLESS .2141 CA 92101619-645-7711 Gated at 191 North an lose, CA 95113. hearing to consider adoption amending Community Development Department, Monday Residential). APPLICATION UPDR07 -001D undersigned Trustee' claims any liability or any California, will sell on 03 25/ at II:OOAM; AT YOU TAKE ACTION TO PRO - TER. YOUR PROPERTY, IT For NON SALE , information only YOU OBJECT to the grand• q U the petition, you of Ordinance. Chapter 16 of the Saratoga 10 through Thursday, 7:30 a.m. •5:00 p.m. If you have ques- (503- 16.017) LU;13414 SUR- REY LANE (Address changed incorrectness of the street address and other common THE NORTH MARKET STREET TO THE COUNTY MAY BE.SOLD AT A PUBLIC SALE, IF YOU NEED AN Sale Line: 714. 259.7850 , Or Login to: could appear at the hearing td state your objections or Municipal Code, relating building regulations and fire tions, Planners are available the public counter to 13426 Surrey Lane) —The requests Design designation, If any, shown herein. Said sale will be ENTRANCE COURTHOUSE, 190 NORTH EXPLANATION OF THE OF THE PROCEED- www.fidelityasap.com Reinstatement Line: Nicole le written objections with It mutt before the hearing. safety.. - The proposed - Ordinance at between the hours of 7:30. 12:00 applicant Review approval to demolish home and con- made, but without covenant or warranty, expressed Or MARKET STREET. SAN JOSE, CA at public auction, to the NATURE ING AGAINST YOU, YOU A Fuentes, Trustee Sale Officer . If have been cur appearance may be in would adopt the 2007 a.m. and noon. the existing strucl new two -story home. implied; regarding title, pos• highest bidder for cash or as described below, SHOULD CONTACT LAWYER. you previously discharged through bank- Information: The proposed structure will The be approximately 5,515 session, or encumbrances, to pay the remaining princi• the notes) check payable g full at time of sale, all rigor title, and inter• A public auction sale to c the highest bidder For cash, release you may have been released of personal liability square feet and approxi- mately 25 -feet t1- inches tall. pal sum of secured by said Deed of est conveyed to and now held by it under said Deed of cashier's check drawn on a state or national bank check case for this loan in which case this letter is intended to No refunds after submission. Canceled ads will receive credit for Future advertising. The gross lot size is 47,480 Trust, with interest thereon; in said note(s), Trust, in the property situat- drawn by state or federal exercise the note holder's - not a refund. Ads must be angled before deadline for that issue. Square feet, and the sites zoned R-1-40,000. eet, and t Design as provided advances, under the terms of ed in said County and Stale credit union, or a check drawn by a state or federal rights against the real prop erty only. Advertisements arc accepted upon the representation chat the ad and /or its Review required pursuant Code section 15- said Deed of Trust, fees, of and as more fully described savings association, THE PURPOSE OF COLLECT - agency have the right to publish the contents thereof. In lication, and its agency agree to and consideration of such pub- hold the publisher harm. to tit APPLICATION pPDR07 -0016 Trustee n of the trusts tree ated by said Deed of Trust. Deed of Trust. Threferenced street address and other common ton. r savings or savings bank specified in to the Financial ING A DEBT. THIS FIRM IS - ATTEMPTING TO COLLECT A advertiser IM against any expense or reserves the _indemnify loss by reason of any claims arising out of publication. right to edit, alter.-omit, or refuse any advertising sub. (517 -08.025) ESTAHBANATI; 20731 St. Charles Street - The total amount of the unpaid balance of the oblig- designation, if any, of the real property described is to be: Section SlOI code and authorized to do business in this state, will be DEBT ON BEHALF OF THE. HOLDER AND OWNER OF. The publisher mitred. The applicant requests Design Review approval to atiansecuredby[heproper- ty to be sold and reasonable above purported 20042 KARN CIRCLE, SARATOGA, CA, held by duly appointed THE NOTE. ANY INFORMA• For policies concerning specific categories- plase refer to the paragraph at the begin- eans[ construct aistnew home 'and demolish expenses and costs' the time of undersigned Trustee d se made, but without covenant expressed or VIDED TONTHIS FIRM OR THE CREDITOR WILL BE USED ning of the c meory or call us at 408.200.1025 story home. The proposed the initial publication of the is claims any liability for any incorrectness of the street or warranty, implied, .regal title, pos. FOR THAT PURPOSE. or email us at classifieds @community- newspapers.com. structure will be approxi- mately 2,530 square feel Notice of Sale $1,257,712.32 The beneficia- address and other common ncu session, or encumbrances, session, ngnote(s) As required by law, you are ilicon Valley Community Newspapers accepts no liability for its failure, for any 8.5- inches tall. The ygross lot heretofore executed Trust and herein.. The total amount of pal sum of the by the Deed of Trust, tive credit report�refl reflecting on your credit record may Scause, to insert an advertisement. Liability far any error appearing in an advertise- No allowance, however, will size is 6,012 square feel, is zoned R•I• delivered to the undersigned a written Declaration of the unpaid balance with interest thereon of the oblig• secured with interest and late report submitted to a credit report fulfill mint is limited to the cost of the space actually occupied. be for an error that does not materially affect the value of the, advertisement. and the site Design Review City Sale �iand anwrinen Notdicefof tyito be sold p us reasonable n charges thereon, ote(s), aadvances, terms elf youracred gae 987869 granted TO quality for an adjustment, any error must be reported within 15 das a( publication rego red pursuant Code section 15.45.0to Default and Election to Sell. estimated costs, expenses at the time of under the terms aF the Deed of Trust, interest thereon, tions. ASAP# (Pub SN 2127, 315, 3112) date. Credit for errors is limited to first insertion. (Pub SN 3/12) The undersigned caused . and advances • • ttachment 5 KI FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTE: 1. REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: THE FIRE FLOW FOR THIS PROJECT IS 2000 GPM AT 20 PSI RESIDUAL PRESSURE. PRESSURE. AS AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM WILL BE INSTALLED THE FIRE FLOW HAS BEEN REDUCED BY 50% ESTABLISHING A REQUIRED ADJUSTED FIRE FLOW OF 10l)0 GPM AT 20 PSI RE IgqUAL PRESSURE. THE ADJUSTED FIRE FLOW IS AVAILABLE FROM AREA WATER MAINS AND FIRE HYDRAROE I WHICH ARE SPACED AT THE REQUIRED SPACING. _ - .,.'. _ 2. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM REQUIRED: BUILDING REQUIRING A FIRE FLOW IN EXCESS OF 2000 GPM OR IS THREE (3 OR MORE STORIES IN HEIGHT OR, IN EXCESS OF 10 000 SQUARE FEET OR NEW HOMES LOCATED WIT HI THE HAZARDOUS FIRE AREA SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN AUTOMAqTIC FIRE SPRIN LER SYSTEM, HYDRAULICALLY DESIGNED PER NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA) STANDARD 13. A STATE 0 CALIFORNIA LICENSED FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT PLANS CALCULATION, A COMPLETED PERMIT APPLICATION AND APPROPRIATE FEES TO THIS DEPARTMENT FOR 12EVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO BEGINNING THEIR WORKS. 3. FIRE APPARATUS (ENGINE) ACCESS DRIVEWAY REQUIRED: PROVIDE AN ACCESS DRIVEWAY WITH A PAVED ALL WEATHER SURFACE, A MINIMUM UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH OF 14 FEET PAVED AND 2 FEET UNPAVED VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 13 FEET 6 INCHES, MINIMUM CIRCULATING TURNING RADIUS OF 36 FEET OUTSIDE AND 23 FEET INSIDE. AND A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 157.. INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO FIRE DEPARTMENT STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHEET D -1. 4. FIRE DEPARTMENT (ENGINEI DRIVEWAY TURN - AROUND REQUIRED: PROVIDE AN APPROVED FIRE DEPARTMENT ENGINE DRIVEWAY TURNARQUND. INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT STANDARD AND SPECIFICATIONS D -1. - - 1 I- REQUIRED - COMPLIANT? - FRONT 30' -0" 43' -3" (15'6' +IVA*) /2x2 -9' LEFT SIDE IST FLOOR "CONSTRUCTION SITE SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY 6' OPAQUE FENCE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. " NO CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL EOUIPMEN7 PORTABLE TOILET, TRASH CONTAINERS, OR DEBRIS SHALL BE PLACED IN THE P( BLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY. U RESI - I 75 - ,DENCE • A TRASH CONTAINER SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON THE SITE AT ALL TIMES AND DEBRIS _ _ - -__ ON SITE WHICH COULD OTHERWISE BLOW AWAY, SHALL BE REGULARLY COLLECTED ` AND PLACED IN CONTAINER.( - _ - - " BLOW NST SHIALL BE PILEDWWITDNSTHEPPROPORTYHLINES OFIStHEHPROJECTNIN A - NEAT AND SAFE MANNER. THE PROJECT SHALL HAVE A SIGNAGE VIEWABLE FROM THE PUBLIC STREET THAT - INDICATES THE HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION AS: MONDAY -- FRIDAY FROM 730 AM TO 6:00 PM, SATURDAY FROM 9:00 AM TO 5:00 PM. 13426 63' -5" SURREY RIGHT SIDE IST FLOOR LANE 5'.7 x 5' -7 / 2 - ' OBTAIN AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FROM PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO THE START- OF ANY DRIVEWAY APPROACH DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION AT THE STREET. CONTACT PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEER, MAECDONIO NUN EZ, AT (408) 868 -1218 FOR REGARDING OBTAINING AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. SS' -9" 115.88 sq.tt. REAR IST FLOOR 50' -0" 54' -4° 12 REAR 2ND FLOOR 60' -0" ALL ELECTRIC ' ALL ELECTRIC LINES, COMMUNICATION LINES AND APPURTENANCES, INCLUDING SARATOGA, � 95070 _ ALL INSTALLED CUNDERGROUND AND TELEGRAPH SYSTEMS, SHALL BE LOCATED AND r� SETBACKS REQUIRED PRISED COMPLIANT? - FRONT 30' -0" 43' -3" (15'6' +IVA*) /2x2 -9' LEFT SIDE IST FLOOR 20-0" 49' -II" 348.10 sq.tL LEFT SIDE 2ND FLOOR 20' -0" 63' -5" E2 RIGHT SIDE IST FLOOR 20' -0" 08' -9" 5'.7 x 5' -7 / 2 RIGHT SIDE 2ND FLOOR 20' -0" SS' -9" 115.88 sq.tt. REAR IST FLOOR 50' -0" 54' -4° 12 REAR 2ND FLOOR 60' -0" 60' -0" 21' -9' x 5' -6' 2ND FLOOR Section Dfinenslons Area A2 5' -6' z - 77.00 sqR B2 (15'6' +IVA*) /2x2 -9' 45.95 sq.tL C2 18' -1' x 19' -3' 348.10 sq.tL D2 19-7 x 13' -4' 261.11 sqA E2 16' -0' x 15' -9' 252.00 sq.tt. F2 5'.7 x 5' -7 / 2 15.59 sq.tL G2 8' -7 z 13'i' 115.88 sq.tt. H2 (4'E' + 10' -101) 12 x 3' -2' 24.31 sq.tt. 12 15'-8' x 25' -10' 404.72 bq.tt. J2 21' -9' x 5' -6' 119.63 sq.tL K2 9' -7 x 10' -10' 103.82 sq.8. L2 14'-8' -0 x 14*-D" 205.33 sq.tt. M2 (14' -W 6' -1') / 2 x 4' -3.5' 44.55 sq.ft. TOTAL FLOOR AREA 2,017.99 sq.tL 1ST FLOOR Section Dimenslons Area Al (9'- 9' +14'- 8')/2x4'.11' 60.02 sq.t, B1 (22'-2' + 25' -8') 12 x T -6' 83.71 q.ft. Ct 25' -8' x 30' -9' 789.25 q.ft. DI 37 -0' x 21' -0' 672.00 sq.tt. E1 (4'-3' +10' -10') /2x6' -7 49.65 sgJIL F1 11' -3' x 33' -0' 371.25 sq.iL G1 9' -3' s 2' -0' 18.50 sq.ft. Hl (16'-10' z V -5.51 16.48 sq.ft. 11 (4'-6' + 10' -10') / 2 x T -2' 24.31 sq.n. A - 10' -10' x 12'-4- 133.61 sq.ft. K1 40' -3' x 13' -6' 543.38 sq.tt. LI 37 -9' x 5' -6' 207.63 sq.ft M1 40'-3' x 10' -10' 436.04 sq.tL NI 14'-8' x 3'-2' 46.44 sq.ft. 01 (14'- 8-+6'- 1')/2x4' -3.5' 44.55 sgJL TOTAL 1ST FLOOR AREA - 3,496.82 sq.ft. TOTAL 1 ST FLOOR AREA - 3,496.82 sq.ft. TOTAL 2ND FLOOR AREA = 2,017.99 sq.ft. TOTAL FLOOR AREA - 5.514.81 sq.ft. 1 OWNER. MR. & MRS. LU 826 UNIVERSITY AVENUE LOS ALTOS, CA 94024 TEL: (650) 917 -9583 ARCHITECT: LHC ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 13937 LYNDE AVENUE SARATOGA, CA 95070 TEL: (408) 483 -1965 SCOPE OF WORK TO DEMOLISH THE EXISTING ONE STORY HOUSE AND BUILD A NEW TWO -STORY HOUSE WITH 3 -CAR GARAGE, ONE LIVING ROOM, ONE FAMILY ROOM, ONE DINING ROOM, ONE KITCHEN, ONE STUDY ROOM, ONE LIBRARY, FOUR BEDROOMS. AND FOUR AND HALF BATHS. DRAWING INDEX ARCHITECTURAL A -0 TITLE SHEET & BLOCK OUT CALCULATION A -1 SITE PLAN A -2.1 PROPOSED IST FLOOR PLAN A -22 PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR PLAN A -2.3 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN A -3.1 PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS A -3.2 PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS A -3.3 PROPOSED BUILDING SECTIONS LANDSCAPE L -1.0 LANDSCAPE CONCEPTUAL PLAN L -2.0 PLANT LIST. NOTES, LEGEND CIVIL C -0.0 TITLE SHEET C -1.1 NOTES C -2.1 GRADING PUN - C -3.1 UTILITY PLAN - C -4.1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C -5.1 DETAILS SHEET SURVEY T -1 BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHY MAP VICINITY MAP PROJECT DATA PROJECT ADDRESS: 13426 SURREY LANE, SARATOGA, CA 95070 ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 503 -16 -017 ZONING CLASSIFICATION: R1- 40,000 . 1. SITE AREA: 47,480 S.F. (GROSS) 1.09 ACRE (GROSS) 47,480 S.F. (NET) 1.09 ACRE (NET) AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: 19.80% ADJUSTED NET SITE AREA: 47,480 S.F. - 30% = 33,236 S.F. AGE OF RESIDENCE: ORIGINAL BUILDING WAS BUILT IN 1957 2. SITE COVERAGE: MAX. ALLOWED: 16,618 S.F. (35 %) BUILDING (INCLUDE GARAGE) 3,484 S.F. (2822S.F. 1ST FL. + 662S.F. GARAGE) PORCH: 128 S.F. IMPERVIOUS PAVING / DRIVEWAY: 10,677 S.F. (INCLUDE SWIMMING POOL) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 14,289 S.F. (30.09 %) 3. F.A.R. ( FLOOR AREA RATIO): MAX. ALLOWED: 5,532 S.F. (4,050 S.F. + 19X78 S.F.) EXISTING HOUSE (DEMOLISHED): 1,792 S.F. (2,280S.F. LIVING + 510S.F. GARAGE) PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR: 2,801 S.F. PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR: 2,018 S.F. PROPOSED GARAGE: 696 S.F. TOTAL PROPOSED HOUSE: 5,515 S.F. (11.62 %) 4. SET BACK REQUIRED: FRONT YARD SETBACK: 30 FT. SIDE YARD SETBACK: 20 FT. REAR YARD SETBACK: 50 FT. (15T FL.) & 60 F.T. (2ND FL.) 5. BUILDING HEIGHT: - LOWEST ELEVATION POINT: +438'6 - HIGHTEST ELEVATION POINT: +451'6' AVERAGE ELEVATION POINT: +445'0 PROPOSED TOP -MOST ELEVATION POINT: +470.9° APPLICABLE CODES: 2007 DEC, CMC, CPC, CFC, CEC, & CITY OF SARATOGA ORDINANCES. 2005 CALIFORNIA ENERGY STANDARD OCCUPANCY GROUP: R3 /U1 TYPE. OF CONSTRUCTION: V -B LHC L.H.C. Construction 21000 -A Big Basin Way Saratoga, CA 95070 (408) 867 -9331 i 4 C -28947 c 9�h11 OWNER: Yen Wen Lu 826 University Avenue Los Altos, CA 94024 (650) 917 -9583 0 I` 0�/� LO W W Z U J QW WO zi U) CC Q W� 'U) U r W R (Q v O LL V/ 'Q'^^ REVISIONS: /QI CITY 1,0"IENT Jan 3,'08 /1\ CITY catst41 Feb. 19,'02 SHEET TRUE: TTfLE SI EET ... BLOC( OUT CALCULATION! DATE PROJECT NO. Oct. 16, 2001 01 -12 SCALE DRAWN • • 0 M��MEN1 • ool n tE 1� - I - C-28947 General Notes Q CITY COMMENT Jan. 3, 'Oa NOT TO SCALE o a IN FELT No. Revision /Issue Dale L it SARA TOGA 9 T LHC DESIGN LU RESIDENCE 13937 LYNDE AVENUE 13426 SURREY LANE SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 TEL: (408) 483-1965 - '- TEL: (650) 917-9583 1 - FAX: (408) 867 -9331 a -mail: yenwenlu @yahoo.com ,—, 07 -12 VICINITY MAP - NOT TO SCALE o a IN FELT 1 Inch - PO R BASIS OF BEARINGS RE WARW MAEFN 71110 FIRM MaJAWS Ov 9AWY LANE AS 9VW aV -TRACT Al2 141.1 IBIS OF S44AI" ; &W JY BW 55 aF MA-4 PACE A SANTA LYARA CaNTY AYCOM TAADV AS MOM '4535' 48' NUT. TEMPORARY BENCHMARK Ma AUNT aV NE CWM? LW CIF 9 MY LANE AT TIE BEWW OF QRW AV TROVT OF HI SE AUED? 13114. ELEYA84y - 431178 NOTES THE BOUNDARY INFORMA770M SHOW HEREON IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A BOUNDARY SURVEY BY THE - - SURVEYOR. - ELEVATIONS SHOW HEREON ARE BASED ON CITY OF SARATOGA DATUM - , TREE CANOPIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE UTILITY INFORMATION / THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND URL177ES AS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES AND RECORD INFORMATION. LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY VARY FROM LOCABONS SHOWN HEREON. ADD17IONAL BURIED U77LIAES/57RUCTURES MAY EXIST. NO EXCAVAIIONS WERE MADE DURING THE PROGRESS OF THIS SURVEY TO LOCATE BURIED U77LI71ES /STRUCTURES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVA BONS, U77LITY COMPANIES AND THE CITY ENGINEERS OFFICES SHOULD BE CONTACTED AND NOTIFIED. Q �7 7 TRACT N0. 1413 BK 55 PG 55 LHC DESIGN LU RESIDENCE 13937 LYNDE AVENUE 13426 SURREY LANE SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 TEL: (408) 483-1965 - '- TEL: (650) 917-9583 1 - FAX: (408) 867 -9331 a -mail: yenwenlu @yahoo.com ,—, 07 -12 sh- Al aa. Oct. 8, 2007 w,. by - Ching -Min • 0 NOTES: 1. PROVIDE 5/8" TYPE "X" GYP. BD. 0 ALL WALLS AND CEILING IN STORAGE RM UNDER STAIR 2. PROVIDE W/R GREEN GYP. BD. 0 AROUND SHOWER, TUBS PER SEC. 2512 UBC 3. FURNACE COMBUSTION AIR TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 702 UMC 4. WATER HEATER / FURNACE SHOULD BE STRAPPED @ RAISED +18" OFF THE FLOOR PER UPC / UMC 5. FIRE PUCE TO COMPLY ICBO #3507 FMI 6. ALL BATH ROOM LIGHTS SHALL BE FLUORECENT LIGHTS. 7. ALL SHOWER OR TUB GLASS DOOR SHALL BE TEMPERED GLASS. 8. PROVIDE A MIN. 5 SO.FT. MECHANICAL VENTILATING SYSTEM FOR BATH, UTILITY ROOM, AND ROOM OF SIMILAR NATURE. 9. THE SHOWERS AND TUB /SHOWER WALLS SHALL HAVE A MOISTURE RESISTANT UNDERLAYMENT TO A MIN. HEIGHT OF 70" ABOVE THE DRAIN INLET PER SEC. 807.1.3 OF 2001 CBC. LEGEND: 2X4 or 2x6 WOOD STUDS 0 16" O.C. W/ 1/2" THK. GYP. BD. ON BOTH SIDES USE W/R GREEN GYP. BD. 6 WET WALLS (1/2" CDX PLYWOOD 0/ STUD 0 SHEAR WALLS) smommumm 2x4 or 2x6 WOOD STUDS 0 16" O.C. W/ 1/2" THK. GYP. BD. INTERIOR SIDE 7/8' CEMENT PLASTER OVER PAPER BACKED — OR WOOD SIDING OVER 15# BLDG. PAPER (PAINTED) OVER 1/2' COX PLYWOOD (SEE ELEVATIONS FOR EXTERIOR FINISH) 2X4 OR 2X6 WOOD STUDS 0 16" O.C. W/ 5/8" TYPE "X" GYP. BD. ON BOTH SIDES. (1/2" COX PLYWOOD 0/ STUD 0 SHEAR WALLS) WINDOWS 32'-0" _ FAA OA-Ce��F" SCALE: 1/4 " =1' -O" General Notes QI CITY COn-ENT Jan 3,'08 E.A21 Oct. 8, 2007 Ching -Min - No. Revision /Issue Date Plgi No a,w ,am.A LHC DESIGN LU RESIDENCE 13937 LYNDE AVENUE 13426 SURREY LANE SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 TEL: (408) 483 -1965 TEL: (650) 917 -9583 FAX: (408) 867 -9331 _ e -mail: yenwenlu @yahoo.com 01 Psi 07 -12 E.A21 Oct. 8, 2007 Ching -Min - Cl 0 .BOOR PAW NOTES Filar X 2C DOUBLE SINK W/ GARBAGE DISPOSAL ©t PROVIDE SURFACE AIGIM M GAP IF FEOURED. ® Or CLEAR REF. SPACE PLWB FOR WATER SUPPLY. Q 2z X 30' uNDERFLoCR ACCESS PANEL PER UHC. 29175 ® sPRO11� SOAP � TILE TO n. TIN.¢ ® SHOWER CURTAIN ROO. 7❑. �SSED MEDICINE CABINET. OVAL TUS ® PROVIDE MOTOR ACCESS TILE opnONAL HYOROMASSAGE BATHTUBS. (VERIFY) ® ELECTRICAL AETE R 6 400 AIDS PAIR. ® GAS .METER Il G 31N PROWE F1H OAB SERVICE PANEL uULS3IG StE T -2a t3ErRGV REPORT. K.. 9'X3' MN CONIC. LAMM AT ALL NEW DOOR B' MAX PROM FMS!® FLOOR ®ffi" FIW WOOD PLATFORM( FOR WM � MYE R VENT PER WAG SOTS EKS/B' TYPE'XTGGYP. BETWEEN W// Sd COOLER NAL AT r C.C. n®2r X 3D' ATTIC ACCESS PANEL PER LU BOBt Q _9B" BLDEN RANGE OVEN OOIBNATION W/ GILT -N WOODS, LIGHT L FAN (VENT TO CUTSDE ARID ®D018E NS' TYPE 7C GYPSUM BOARD UNDER STARS, ®FAll R' VENT TO OUTSIDE AR ® WM 7T VENT TO OUTSIDE AR PROVIDE BTRA NG OTOLET ACCESS AREA SHALL BE 24G)p(3O'(NO PROVIDE Fib GAS FULL .A11 e�X1 8F3_ T -24 ELBBY R6'ORT. ® TfNFERATLRE A PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE © GARBAGE COMPRESSOR PROVIDE TXAOCIC CR waN0Ei1 BOARD' WALL LNNG 71.E WELiIBA _ _W CULTURE MARBLE OR ®ALL R1�6lKi FDITUFB SHALL BE OF UPC APPROVED PiWOUCL3 TiE FOMIRE N SHOWER SWILL HAVE PRESSURE OR THERMOSTATIC hWM VALVE THAT LMIT WATER TBiBiATURE TO 1". 27 7C PEfr -BART SHWIR PAN TlE TO n. UND, DISK ® SHATTERPROOF GLASS MOWER 8101ti 1IIE W/ TOWER BAR ® SKYLDFR. LOBO. APPROVED PRODUCT. ® 3' MGM 3' CIA. POST N FRONT OF WM A Flit f138' ►ETAL IFFER ACE. PROVIDE F.6 AND RO=Y. '�'k(X��3R1O OR UL APPROVE/ PRODUCT, FELD VERIFY. �OCAU7E B gg MUi� a LOWERED. AOV AGEF X ® 13LLT -N MCAOWAVE AND OVEN © PROVIDE CON( STEPS W/ B' HIGH MAX 0 GARAGE MAN DOOR ® CABINET CABT W/ SINK B 2 oURETB. ® 3-AW UAL BOX OPENING PER OWNER 97 3T(3' CONCL PAD FOR HVAC CO DBBERt ®CONIAOLL® BY AA SWRd1 LOCAIID AT REQUIRED PASSAGEWAY OPEIIIG (CAI( SBL - F,D AR(`y a, C -]B917 Q SCALE: 1/4 " =1' -O" - �- General Notes QCITY CCI9'ENT JAn 3•'08 2 . 2 ]07-12 ct. 8, 2007 hing -Min No. Revision /Issue Date nm — Addlt Pml cl N and b LHC DESIGN LU RESIDENCE 21000A BIG BASIN WAY _ 13426 SURREY LANE SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 TEL: (408) 483 -1965 TEL: (650) 917 -9583 FAX: (408) 867 - 9331.. - e -mail: yenwenlu @yahoo.00m 2 . 2 ]07-12 ct. 8, 2007 hing -Min i NOTE 1. PROVIDEPOSMVEDRAINAGETOROOFDRAINSFROMAUPARTS OF THE ROOF. 2. DS. C —; INDICATES 2 X 3.26 GA. G.I. DOMSPOUFS LOCATED AS SHOWN. 3. PROVIDE 5'- 26 GA. G.I. WEE GUTTER OVER 2 X B SPRUCE FASCIA BOARD -TW. 4. ROOF PITCH TO MATCH EXISTING ROOF I5: 1211. --0. 5. ROOF MATERIAL TO MATCH EXISTNG ROOF OVER 30 N FELT -1 W. S. PROVIDENECESSAW FLASHING ATAU-ROOF ANDWAU- CONNECTIONS AS REQUIRED. ATTIC VENTILATXXJ REQUIRED: 471360 SI 4910 SF 1 159. 32.]3 SF X144 = 1)1369 SI 30% 70P _ 4713.S0 X 30°6 = 14!4.08 SI ]0% BOTTOM. 4)13.60 X ]0%. 329952 SI PROPOSED: 2982.43 SI 30°1 TOP: GABLE VENT 1 a 16 X 30. 489 SI - DOMER VENT 8lm 314 X 9 X 9 / 2 1017.36 SI )t1%80TTOM: EAVE VENTS 42 ®145 X &S . 42 X)9.)5 331950 SI ATTIC VEMIIATgN REQUIRED: 35G392SI 3712 SF / 150.24.)5 SF X—t 356352 SI CRAWL VENTS 45![0145 X 55:45 X )9.)5.3588.)5 SI 1 0 General Notes QI CITT CC-M' T Jan. 3,'08 2�. 3 mt�Oct. 8, 2007 — M Ching -Min No. Revision /Issue Date ON P,oi 07 -12 2�. 3 mt�Oct. 8, 2007 — M Ching -Min (0 PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4 ".V -0" .4n' - -- - - - - -- MAXI AA A LLOWABLE - '---------------------------------- J �L Y,7 L L J JJ z i1 '� Y Y� -�A-L -"'.+IL'L a ToP a_ �7 _.Z:_ 111- w CITY Cafi&NT Ja, 3,'08 EA3.1 Oct. 8, 2007 a wChing -Min No. Revision /Issue Dote EM (0 General Notes QI CITY Cafi&NT Ja, 3,'08 EA3.1 Oct. 8, 2007 a wChing -Min No. Revision /Issue Dote LHC DESIGN 13937 LYNDE AVENUE SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 TEL: (408) 483 -1965 FAX: (408) 867 -9331 LU RESIDENCE 13426 SURREY LANE SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 TEL: (650) 917-9582 e -mail: yenwenlu @yahoo.com ILI v, "i 07 -12 EA3.1 Oct. 8, 2007 a wChing -Min PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=V-0" 0 �4T ELEVATION NOTES L STONE OR SLATE VENEER PER OUNER 2. 3 COAT STUCCO FNISH. 3. WOOD TRIM • EAVE W/ GURER - 4. 8' FORMED STUCCO a WINDOW SILL. 5. b' FORTED STUCCO OR 2X6 WOOD TRIM AROUND WINDOW / DOOR b. COMER VENTS. SEE ROOF PLAN FOR LOCATICNS. 1. DECORATIVE Ib'X30' GABLE VENT W/ 4' TRIM. 8. PRE- FABLICATED LARK¢ DOOR PER OWNER S. FRE- FABLICATED WOOD ENTRANCE DOOR 10. WEEP SCREED. A MN. OF 76 GA CORROSION - RESISTANT DEEP SCREED W/ A MN. VERTICAL ATTAC 4IF-W RAGE OF FC NDATICN PLATE LINE ON ALL EXTERIOR STUD WALLS W/ STUCCO. THE SCREED SHALL BE PLACED A MR OF 4' 'ABOVE TE EARTH OR 2' ABOVE PAVED AREAS MID SHALL BE OF A TYPE UNICH WILL ALLOW TRAPFED WATER TO DRAIN TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING IL 40 TEARS COMFPCSITION 5HINGLE CLASS 'A' MN OR FLAT ROOF TILE PER OWNER . Q. CRAWL SPKE VENT. - - B. 145' X 1175' CRAW- SPACE VENT W/ WELL N STOW DRAIN CONNECTION a FRONT FACADE. Ap,�� ! � � t �f C -28917 General Notes Q CITT come -ENT- Jan. 3,'08 J3:.2 D Oct..8, 2007 Dra'. m Dy Ching -Min No. Revision /Issue Date LHC DESIGN 13937 LYNDE AVENUE SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 TEL: (408) 483-1965 FAX: (408) 867-9331 LU RESIDENCE 13426 SURREY LANE SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 TEL: (650) 917 -9582 e -mail: yenwenlu @yahoo.com eroia+ 07.12 J3:.2 D Oct..8, 2007 Dra'. m Dy Ching -Min • • • PROPOSED LATITUDE SECTION SCALE: 1/4"=V-0" 'A' F 51.5' )INT lT 10 General Notes QI CITT CQ'IMENi Jan 3,'08 E3. D�•Jun. 4, 2007 Drarn Oy Ching -Min No. Revision /Issue Date LHC DESIGN 13937 LVNDE AVENUE SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 TEL: (408) 483-1965 FAX: (408) 867-9331 Prajat Name an r LU RESIDENCE 13426 SURREY LANE SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 TEL: (650) 917-9582 e -mail: yenwenlu @yahoo.com P'77 -12 E3. D�•Jun. 4, 2007 Drarn Oy Ching -Min PLANT MATERIAL UST YAOAV DESIGN •, t `� .. ! - TREES GROUP ' KEY BOVINICAL KUM COMMON NIII 5m DESCRIPRON 4321E C ¢1Do a w9 3 t Famo, S C 9453E A �, 4;21? ACER PALMATUM JAPANESE MILE 36 "'BOX DECIDUOUS, AIRY AND DELICATE fOUAGE O ¢ a I s N -i-310,81 ouw 455gA5R SANGO KAKU - ALL YEAR INTEREST T.. s51043ao433 . 1 = bj 1 4)19 - ._-— �CHAMAEROPS HUMILIS MEDITERRANEAN 24' BOX SLOW GROWING PALM: GOOD CLEAN SCREEN ,pD�L 4 f� Tip } 4SA � 4P G E M FAN PAL _ - q --- ' CINNAMONUM CAMPHORA CAMPHOR 24" BOX EVERGREEN; LARGE SHADE TREE Ss T� r �- -_- LACERSTROEMIA INDICA CRAPE MYRTLE 15 GAL DECIDUOUS; PINK FLOWERS SUMMER -FALL /hAb' n / Y - •I .o-1 �SQ�.- -�,", -1 _ _ / S M T R - `[P -Si --�} I NbN � %NF/. / �,Li3 __ _ .___..__._.- __. -_.. _ "`cr•- _ PO7Q DARK PINK . ALL COLOR . `y BV R 12 Dfi . MAC• F _ E j3. b) vD }4. 433'yG A34' _ ._ 3t -GNINE ELN 1 5 C L�4- RNE '�� yr -T U EO STU �D 15 UOUID STYRACI A AN SWEET .GUM 15 CL ERECT TREE; rP� f! __Z4 MABER FL MERIC �ftft COLOR FALL ,rn N 2'I 4 -- 1p $;. U - -- - - MAGNOUA GRANDIFLORA� SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA 24" BOX EVERGREEN; LARGE WHITE FLOWERS IN SPRING; -NE EP PIV4 a3.VG .;;u OAA,lf' carEVr ------- _ _.._.._ 'SAMUEL SUMMER' - GOOD LARGE SHADE TREE 1 . 3' 435 4 ,1G PP - TO BE D of EXIST ASPHALT PISTACIA CHINENSIS CHINESE PISTACHE za" BOX DECIDUOUS; WIDE CANOPY; FALL COLOR 1 Z URRE LEAF $ 591 TO BE Y W BY HANG. NEW 1 ,m 1, PLUM ALDNC t-F - % 43 OM WAY MIITAND SHOULD - i 1 ORIVEWAY 5 ��GY S EL eE GRACE SAND INSTALLED 346 ON GRADE •'l I 43W� kj tT Ct Ft • hy. w - -n .' . EP POOOCARPUS GRACILIOR FERN PINE 15 CAL EVERGREEN; NARROW AND ERECT TREE; LONG NARROW LEAVES 1• , 9 III c tclte tt`t e _ `ttc t ttF , ` ttttLLtL -c ' • 14 r AMORE i y47y (I 'o c"- F' `{ r �- F t7,}4 }_httttt�4 I-1` LF �� .{ t 1s• / / \\ PRUNUS CERASIFERA PURPLE LEAF PLUM 15 GAL DARK PURPLE FLOWERING PLUM i n \e - L LL HtrHhH -h L�¢ - \•v 'KRAUTERVESUVIUS' PINK FLOWERS, NO FRUIT 1 ( :RELr.'.' ^ xBaovERrr „` _• iy `cn 1 {MONTEREr PINE Y E -y g1 L F �=a�• BOtANCARY ' F t �'. / �{ .' ✓ -.� �4 u 1 M T RNE PRUNUS SERRULATA FLOWERING CHERRY 36" BOX DECIDUOUS: DEEP ROSY PINK FLOWERS: }a m L' /• / :t` •s; '_`R� - F �` i� J PLANTERS p . c„ o �/ 1 ^� �• � • r /' Y [ c. ( F, � • ' KWANZAN' BRANCHES FORM INVERTED CONE a '9 FLgWERIN R 1• - ' 1 A - PYRUS GALLERYANA FLOWERING PEAR 24 BOX DECIDUOUS; WHITE FLOWERS SPRING; 11 n�l�f`i TREES ALD •� tttttt'c r� •lr�• •J j ( .� �L "•`,`i _ -• S + 8q - I ,,o C I oRnEw ,�; ' I L a a 17 dE t it I d.•. }1 • llrY-,n • - a�E i • _ ".-y ' O T /^, �`' NTICLEER• TALL NARROW FORM ar x 16" HI GH e UILT -IN CCS TREE LEMON. ORANGE. TANGERINE . 1 myti 'B i � T Fp • .'1'.'.'.'r'.'.� � ✓.-'. .' � SEAT LAWN SLOPES DOWN • RVIT TREE FUJI APPLE, ASIAN PEAR, PEACH, PLUM Et'CFt r _ �1•''• tom.;- TD LOWER PATq - 1 _ I t / f _tttrct t � \ a A �'18%•i�J�'OgT LANDSCAPE LEGEND: l l vPl ���/ � \\ '. � 4u. a `: -y ... _ F a. C� TREE NUMBER c a 1� b'1 r --a IN -Grin o 4A `i / AN4it42 // �- 5 1 4 1. l _ CS SPECIES P 1. �� 2 /• - r- L``-`tca tFt " t tit / ' � \ _ \\\�` il,:f \ - _ - a v' •- a, . 4A36 woc _ _ ; . Y/� a <; •sr c3 f .1 F BOTH ELUS STRUC UREA _ A IpNOTCq°! �;•�'. 56 ABOVE - B' L.�� SIZE MAX EXISTING TREE _ 9 W 1 � 4 4 9 '�l F I � � ' Y �LEF.HkL -t� t�� t6 h 1 _ V'Y � • \\ \ \ '. 1 I.gij8� .G' � l j I � ti. tt �tL[ tt I- ��tthF �F - 0a \\\ \� L <4465a) e �. .�. . •.s�� F �9 OD EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN Cp'e 4q jPqO _ nm I ` IT / r,v z L as F o r 'yc �c I- � I � / .. ° • , ! �.L 2g �,' J�1'c 1 q � Y� � � / y-'u - ' ��-�• • • -`� w ` ��P6\ l'\ EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED min f Ijz 40 / 4 .�.g.r �_ .'_ q9• =_ ,y D ., ,a- •I ��`•� `�o, qST. Aa r� I :m EP/ _ /s` s v t 'V f"` - s "\ `� _ - % EDgp • F SEE ARBORIST REPORT v ; m n yFt j� ' - I. ^� r %; •;;t 5 �h.. G•- .z �-`_ , . . z- '; _ L U RESIDENCE 4a76 1r W DAR - a� I 44 }63j �I G>, l C.r{n' lYl `,_•, - �_ 5 -^^� ��, 4 ��2y' ___ -�` _�- 1q _ EP �' / % / r • •`� ✓- •^ • r ✓ 45g' 9 - 458 SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER 4' %;eal r:: - \� o F� LAWN A4 MAGNOU I� v,i� �-- 1�— �L / ( � •r r/' '-• 5}6 `� � i _ X_ `.. _ •p4 Qbic \ \-: kF VA COtSi Dac - SARA TOGA. CA �E i U i 1'' l:F/ ``_'':l •� ' n, R-, si-. _, • :.? 03 _ V .,, �. -'_.- �., —� CONCRETE WALKWAY �•I I r' r i y µG'• '.4.:r. 1;,� ... - - POOL z0'xa0'� v d 4, aq} / '/? -�' � ' w1oE w1AD • - • �. • -. .:._,•= �'�"`� : ;' -: � z' HICK WALL EA 4 GN _I GL I 4^ 1''ST Ft,' v '"�- �, : r� _ a(N- :T11EE5 vt 10'.12' OPEN PATIO PAVING - MATERIAL PER OWNER A+Yr. 06015.00 � i r 47 EP I • % - 6•casT- REteraO'o ":9•..'_�`�•_ - .p T' _ a _ � 1 4 L SHED I im l t PL I I 1 �•t .'yA� _ _ cL` {15 4U 4b _�_ 5' TALL MAX RF. NY PAVING - PERVIOUS MATERIAL A 4 NY 4 DRIVEW AY 1 o - tiir`'�wII -� � ii I I -� ✓T����D' ". ,• yplr_RE7gI�NG_ -w -� � •a�� 444 v".'�vvavv�vvv �Y1N05CAPE WALKWAY - PERVIOUS MATERIAL �_ TL 07/26/07 i •I I i / I -I a I. �. •6• R PLANT UST 0 _ 5 —2.0 FOR f • v-4 S HEET L .� •--� G ---- -- @ SEE j 3'i ' —�z� WERINC1 c�eRNrl I I J l.' � Q % . /!` ' . %.% �o ' > •/�� _ _ •t2 • \ _ _ REVISION 1 6 /s /m ty- TREES BEHIND i 3 1 aF �• • o�o vv rb v a v o vp vvv `•0 - �L �y- T'\ 'k�" 4E,6G CITY REV MIG B/30/0] ' 07 REV-AREA FA s zs 1 . i � Ev / _ •/ ��. rev r _ 0� c. � ORD SET 10/09/07 1 �s , I r_ '' '' _ . •: ,y— ns • DESIGN REV sue ID/12/D7 I F 5 Li 47 r �Rl' �° 3 ga -- �8� DESICry REV cMNTS 1z /n /O7 fL q 1 I % 39 46 .a a11' _ CH - G 4 v clmLS 7ReES v v 1 i• FAL�HOR E'sy 1 P DESIGN REV cMNrs 02115/0e Ijl( iIi1 / a69 ,G G` 'D 10 G _ _ i •4g6 'Rl�f j I j I Q�i i is I " I a yO 2 L'u - �--�- EX 5' FL3UC J'IUTV to EN: I rl 4iC§01.1 I �I� I oli "rte G F i I' LIT TREES @ I i II N TES 5, R r NI? X41 3 T Phc T No. 1471 I52 ru - _ 4 I`^ 75� 23 s. 1 n 45 kE/ H N OF x ES ; I SHALL BE INCORPORATED T SET E, FlNAIrBUILDING PLAN 1 S LANDSCAPE 1. THE ARBORIST REPORT INCtUD TFiE TREE INVENTC7171Yi- ABLE AND THE ATTACHED MAP S O G LO 5 E .rl �l PI _ - - f 4 D •I 1 �x' 1 I Gl fP 5 2. TREE PROTECTIVE FENCING SF�,4,�BE.�1NSTAI U'ASCSkTDWN ON THE MAP PREPARED BY CITY ARBO STABUSHED PRIOR TO ANY GINCHE �Ok TyHE GROUND AND N EQUIPMENT OR MATERIALS T. ONE ESTABLISHED. BE CONCEPTUAL 2 COMPRISED OF SIX -FOOT HIGtY.CFWIN/UNK 7FENCINOJ MOUNITED ON EIGHT -FOOT TALL. TWO -INCH DIAMETER GALVANISED :POSTS, DRIVEN 24 INCHES INTO THE GROUND AND SPACED NO MORE THAN 10 FEET APART. ONCE ESTABLISHED. N TH N IN SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ARSDRIST PRIOR TO OBTAINING BUILDING DIVISION' THE FENCING MUST REMAIN UNDISTURBED AND BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION. E FE C G G I _ _ PERMITS. _ j 1 ( i � 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE CONDUCTED OUTSIDE THE DESIGNATED FENCEDPREA(EVEN AFTER FENCING IS REMOVED THESE ACTIVITIES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO, THE 'F'OLLOWING-DEMOLITION, GRADING, PLAN TRENCHING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, STOCKPILING AND DUMPING MATERIALS(INCLUDING SOIL RILL), AND EQUIPMENT/VEHICLE OPERATION AND PARKING. :1 - - .. 1 4 a j I i 4- NO TRENCHING FOR UTILITIES OR DRAINAGE IS PERMITTED INSIDE OF THE FENCED AREA AROUND THE TREES WITHOUT; PRIOR APPROVAL FROM CITY ARBORIST CALL KATE BEAR AT (408)868 - 1276)- UTILITII; INCLUDE ELECTRICAL, DRAINAGE, _ WATER, SEWER, GAS AND LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION. IF TRENCHING IS APPROVED, ROOTS MEASURING TWO INCHES OR LARGER SHALL BE RETAINED AND TUNN 0 UNDERNEATH. ROOTS LESS THAN TWO INCHES MAY BE CUT WITH A SHARP O PRUNING INSTRUMENT. 5. ANY PRUNING OF TREES ON SITE MUST BE PERFORMED BY A LICENSED TREE CONTRACTOR UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF AN IS4 CERTIFIED ARBORIST AND ACCORDING TO 1SA STANDARDS. �. 6. THE DISPOSAL OF HARMFUL PRODUCTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CHEMICALS, PAINT RINSE WATER, FUEL, CEMENT RINSE WATER, HERBICIDES, OR OTHER MATERIALS, IS PROHIBITED BENEATH TREE CANOPIES OR ANYWHERE ON SITE NORTH j ! i THAT ALLOWS DRAINAGE BENEATH TREE CANOPIES. 1 I i �\ PLANT MATERIAL LIST TREES KEY BOTANICAL NOME COMMON NAME SIZE, OESCRWMM w,1 _ vm KEY Wr%WR'AL NAME COMMON NAME $E OESCRPBON PLANTING NOTES YADAV DESIGN ACER PALM ATUM - - JAPANESE MAPLE. 36" BOX DECIDUOUS, AIRY AND DELICATE FOLIAGE -GROUP SANGO KAKD _ - ALL YEAR INTEREST' -' BOUGAINVILLEA BOUGAINVILLEA - 1 GALLON DECIDUOUS; COLORFUL BRACTS - 1 PROVIDE 6" IMPORT TOPSOIL OVER ALL PLANTING AREAS. ® 43213 -mm Cm Dv ps ' MAGENTA COLOR F—C -53e ANTIGONONON LEPTOPUS CORAL VINE 2. PROVIDE 2" MULCH, OVER ALL NEW SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER AREAS. CHAMAEROPS HUMIUS .MEDITERRANEAN � 24" BOX � SLOW GROWING PALM; GOOD CLEAN SCREEN 1 GALLON EVERGREEN:. AIRY FOLIAGE: ROSE 'PINK FLOWER D a e1• N FAN PALM - .3, .PROTECT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN PER PLAN. - - 1.. ioa o.0 +3 - HARDENBERGIA VIOLACEA - HAPPY WANDERER '1 GALLON .EVERGREEN; WHITE AND PURPLE. r: s1o.43eau3 � CINNAMONUM CAMPHORA CAMPHOR 24" BOX EVERGREEN; LARGE SHADE TREE FLOWERS; CASCADES ON WALL '• avc y.d.K1e.�,.com SOLANUM JASMINOIDES POTATO VINE 1 GALLON EVERGREEN; FAST GROWING 4. TREES TO BE. PLANTED O SOON AS POSSIBLE. SEQUENCE CONSTRUCTION TO FACILITATE EARLY GROWTH. CONTRACTOR TO EVALUATE TEMPORARY „a,.�r• A.cn„ .c,�.. ' : HEDERA. HELIX VARIEGATED IVY 1 GALLON EVERGREEN; YELLOW —GREEN IRRIGATION/ INSTALLATION OF PERMANENT IRRIGATION EARLY ON. • LACERSTROEMIA INDICA CRAPE MYRTLE 15 CAL DECIDUOUS; PINK FLOWERS SUMMER —FALL 'GOLDEN INGOT' 'POTOMAC' DARK PINK FALL COLOR TECOMA CAPENSIS CAPE HONEY SUCKLE L GALLON EVERGREEN VINES; FAST GROWING; .5. ALL PLANTING AREAS TO BE AUTOMATICALLY .IRRIGATED WITH DRIP AND SPRAY IRRIGATION. ORANGE FLOWERS - 000IDAMBER STYRACIFLUA AMERICAN SWEET GUM 15 GL NARROW AND ERECT TREE; JASMINUM POLYANTHUM PINK JASMINE 5 GALLON EVERGREEN VINES; FAST GROWING: - FALL COLOR - PINK FLOWERS; WHITE INSIDE MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA 24" BOX EVERGREEN; LARGE WHITE FLOWERS IN SPRING_; DISTICTIS BUCCINATORIA SCARLET TRUMPET VINE 1 GALLON EVERGREEN VINES; FAST GROWING; 'SAMUEL SUMMER' - GOOD LARGE SHADE TREE � � - - - RED FLOWERS - TRACHELOSPERMUM STAR JASMINE 1 GALLON EVERGREEN VINES; FRAGRANT FLOWERS PISTACA CHINENSIS CHINESE PISTACHE 24" BOX DECIDUOUS; WIDE CANOPY; FALL COLOR JASMINOIOES - GRAPE FRUITING VINE 1 GALLON SEEDLESS VARIETY PRODUCTION GRAPE ROSA KORTURER ICEBERG ROSE 3 GALLON EVERGREEN, WHITE, FLOWERS PODOCARPUS GRACILIOR FERN PINE 15 CAL EVERGREEN; NARROW AND ERECT TREE; LONG NARROW LEAVES MINUM. COLOR DESCRPIION PRUNUS CERASIFERA PURPLE LEAF PLUM 15 GAL DARK PURPLE FLOWERING PLUM 'KRAUTER VESUVIUS' PINK FLOWERS, NO FRUIT. SPHIlC/ StIEBIQt LEGEND: ZINNIA ELEGANS COLORFUL, ROUND FLOWERS PRUNUS SERRULATA FLOWERING CHERRY 36" BOX DECIDUOUS; DEEP ROSY PINK FLOWERS; - . KWANZAN BRANCHES FORM INVERTED CONE IMPATIENS NEW GUINEA HYBRIDS SUMMER FLOWERS EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN PYRUS GALLERYANA FLOWERING PEAR 24" BOX DECIDUOUS: WHITE FLOWERS SPRING: LUPINUS NlWUS SPRING FLOWERS - 'CHANTICLEER' TALL NARROW FORM F FALL CATHARANTHUS RRSEUS PERIWINKLE / CITRUS TREE LEMON. ORANGE. TANGERINE PINCUSHION FLOWER ® - SCABIOSA /T`` EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED a FRUIT TREE FUJI APPLE, ASIAN PEAR. PEACH, PLUM POINSETTIA RED FLOWERS 4011110AW PL/INIIIIC LAWN MYOSTOSIS FORGET ME NOT LE IMPATIENS NEW GUINEA HYBRIDS SUMMER FLOWERS 500 – OWARF TALL FESCUE; INSTALL WIRE MESH BELOW SOD swum , PE w"ftS AND CROUIiOCOVFRS IEi EIUOIlK/1L MMLE CAl1AN NAYS 9� GESgtPIgN LEY E10TANIM NAME COMMON NAME WE OF9CPoPIp11 ABUTILON HYBRIDUM FLOWERING MAPLE 5 GALLON EVERGREEN: TALL SHRUB, DROOPING FLOWERS IMPATIENS NEW GUINEA .IMPATIENS F.G. O 8" O.C. ANNUAL; COLORFUL FLOWERS HYBRID AJUGA REPTANS AJUGA F.0 O 12 "O.C. EVERGREEN; QUICK SPREADING GROUNDCOVER 'CAITLIN'S GIANT' BLUE FLOWERS ON SPIKES IBERIS SEMPERVIRENS EVERGREEN CANDYTUFT F.C. B" O.C. EVERGREEN GROUNOGDVER; WHITE FLOWERS THROUGHOUT THE YEAR LAsc LANTANA MONTEVIDEND5I5 LANTANA 1 GALLON EVERGREEN SHRUB; SPREADING; ARBUTUS MARINA STRAWBERRY TREE 15 GALLON EVERGREEN; LARGE SHRUB; RED BERRIES 'CONFETTI' MIX OF YELLOW. PINK, PURPLE ROWERS .mss "� LA 3� ARTEMESIA STELARANA - DUSTY MILLER 4" POTS EVERGREEN; DENSE SILVERY GRAY PLANT O 18" O.C. LAVANDULA ANGUSTIFOLIA ENGLISH LAVENOPR 1 GALLON EVERGREEN: 2 -3 FT TALL; LAVENDER BLUE FLOWERS _ ~ - iz7a7 1 ASPLENIUM BULBIFERUM MOTHER FERN 1 GALLON EVERGREEN FERN; GROWS IN DENSE SHADE UATRIS SPICATA GAYFEATHER 1 GALLON PERENNIAL; PURPLE FLOWERS ON NARROW PLUME �, VERY GOOD HEDGE ff GL BUXUS MICROPHYLLA JAPANESE BOXWOOD 5 GALLON EVERGREEN; BRIGHT GREEN COMPACT FOLIAGE JAPONICA VERY GOOD HEDGE URIOPE MUSCARI BIG BLUE LILY TURF F.G 12" O.C. EVERGREEN CLUMPING GROVNDCOVER: PURPLE FLOWERS SUMMER 1 GALLON EVERGREEN SPREAD UP GROUNDCOVER - CAMELLIA SASPNOUA WHTE CAMELLIA i GALLON EVERGREEN; WHITE FLOWERS IN WINTER MAHONIA REPENS CREEPING MAHONIA MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM MYOPORUM F.G. O 18" O.C. EVERGREEN FAST GROWING GROUNDCOVER CAMPANVLA PORTENSCHLAGMNA BELLFLOWER FLAT GROWN EVERGREEN SPREADING GROUNDCOVER WHITE SUMMER FLOWERS - O 12" O.G. PURPLE FLOWERS NANDINA DOMESTICA HEAVENLY BAMBOO 1 GALLON EVERGREEN; 3' TALL; DELICATE LACY FOLIAGE CANNA HYBRID CANNA 1 GALLON PERENNIAL; LARGE LANCE SHAPED NANA RED BERRIES LU RESIDENCE LEAVES, SHOWY SUMMER FLOWERS NEPETA MUSSINII CATMINT 6" POT O 18" O.C. PERENNIAL: LAVENOAR FLOWERS' CAREX COMANS FROSTY CURLS 5" POT ® GRASS; GRAY GREEN 'FROSTY CURLS' t O.0 OSMANTHUS HETEROPHYLLUS HOLLY LEAF OSMANTHUS 5 GALLON EVERGREEN, CREAMY EDGE LEAVES CATHARANTHUS RRSEUS MADAGASCAR PERIWINKLE F.C. O 12" O.C. PERENNIAL,; SHOWY SUMMER –FALL FLOWERS 'VARIEGATUS' CEANOTHUS GRISEUS CARMEL CREEPER 1 GALLON - EVERGREEN SHRUB; PURPLE FLOWERS SPRING OSTEOSPERMUM FRl1TICOSUM AFRICAN 041ST 1 GALLON EVERGREEN; SPREADING MOUND; 'HORIZONTALIS' 'AFRICAN QUEEN' WHITE– PURPLE FLOWERS IN FALL I34,26 SURREY LANE CISTUS PVRPUREUS ORCHID ROCKROSE 5 GALLON EVERGREEN; 4 FEET TALL BY 4 FEET WIDE SHRUB PELARGONIUM PELTATVM IVY GERANIUM 1 GALLON EVERGREEN: TRAILING. PROFUSE FLOWERS SARATOGA. CA REDDISH PURPLE FLOWERS IN JUNE –JULY - CLARKIA AMOENA GODETIA F.G. B" O.C. SPRING BLOOMING ANNUAL _ PENNISETUM SETACEUM FOUNTAIN GRASS 5 GALLON PERENNIAL GRASS; PURPLE 'RUBRUM' PURPLE FLOWER SPIKES IN SUMMER CUVIA MINIATA KAFFIR LILY 1 GALLON EVERGREEN; ORANGE FLOWERS FEB –APRIL - PETUNIA HYBRIDA GARDEN PETUNIA F.G. 12' O.C. PERENNIAL; FUNNEL SHAPED PROFUSE FLOWERS rrmr,r 06019.00 COREOPSIS GRANDIFLORA COREOPSIS - i GALLON PERENNIAL; NARROW 3 -5 LOBED LEAVES; 'SUNBURST' BRIGHT YELLOW FLOWERS ALL SUMMER PHORMIUM TENAX NEW ZEALAND FLAX 5 GALLON ORANGE STRIPED GREEN SWORD SHAPED LEAVES AsW RF, NY DAPHNE OOORA DAPHNE 5 GALLON EVERGREEN SHRUB; WHITE PINK FRAGRANT FLOWERS 'MAORI SUNSET' DIETES IRIDIOIDES FORTNIGHT LILY 5 GALLON EVERGREEN: FAN SHAPED CLUMPS OF NARROW LEAVES - LAVENDER QUEEN' WHITE FLOWERS SPRING –FALL PIERIS JAPONICA LILY OF THE VALLEY 5 GALLON EVERGREEN; DROOPING CLUSTERS OF FLOWERS DIGITALIS PURPUREA FOXGLOVE 1 GALLON PERENNIAL; SHOWERY FLOWERS; ON TALL STEMS PITTOSPORUM EUGENIOIDES PITTOSPORUM 15 GALLON EVERGREEN. TALL SCREEN SHRUB - 1W D7 /26 /07 ECHIUM FASTUOSUM PRIDE OF MADEIRA 5 GALLON SHRUBBY PERENNIAL; STRIKING FORM; GREAT SPIKELIKE 'PLATINUM' EUONYMUS FORTUNE! COLD EDGED EUONYMUS 1 GALLON 0NEFGRTEMFC8W%CH ELIMME 25VIFMAYL10UNEGREEN POLYSTICHUM SETIFERUM SOFT SHIELD. FERN 1 GALLON EVERGREEN FERN - lkM 'CANADALE GOLD' - YELLOW EDGED LEAVES REMSION 1 a /9/07 PRUNUS CAROLINIANA CAROLINA LAUREL 15 GALLON EVERGREEN TALL SCREEN HEDGE Cm REV Mir 8/30/07 EUONYMUS ALATUS WINGED EUONYMUS 1 GALLON DECIDUOUS; BRIGHT RED FALL COLOR ROSA NOATRUM GROUNDCOVER ROSE 2 GALLON EVERGREEN; PROFUSE FLOWERING SPREADING ROSE REV –AREA 9/75/07 'COMPACTA' DECIDUOUS SHRUB; FOUNTAIN SHAPED; YELLOW FLOWERS SPRING ROSA SP ROSE– 3' WIDE, 4' TALL 2 GALLON MIXED COLORS – MATCHED HEIGHT OCURO SET 10/09/07 FORSYTHIA SPECTABILIS FORSYTHIA 1 GALLON - ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS ROSEMARY 1 GALLON EVERGREEN; SPREADING, TRAILING GROUNDCOVER; BLUE FLOWERS - DESGN REV SUB 10/12/D7 GROW WELL IN SHADE 'HUNTINGTON BLUE' - - - oESGn REV cuNTS 12/17/07 FRAGERIA CHILOENSIS STRAWBERRY F.G. O 10" O.C. EVERGREEN: LOW SPREADING GROUNDCOVER DESIGN REV CMNTS 02/15/08 GERANIUM X GERANIUM 1 GALLON - SPREADING PERENNIAL; BLUE FLOWERS SPRING TO FALL SALIX PURPUREA 'MAMA' DWARF PURPLE OSIER i GALLON EVERGREEN; SPREADING GRAY GREEN SHRUB GAZANIA RIGENS 'LEUCOLAENA' TRAILING CAZANIA F.G O 10" O.C. SPREADING PERENNIAL; YELLOW FLOWERS SPRING TO FALL SALVIA OFFICINALIS COMMON SAGE 1 GALLON PERENNIAL; AROMATIC; PURPLE FLOWERS arm GLADIOLUS HYBRID GARDEN GLADIOLUS 1 GALLON PERENNIAL; SHOWERY FLOWERS; LANCE SHAPED LEAVES STREUTZIA REGINAE BIRD OF PARADISE 5 GALLON EVERGREEN; ORANGE BIRD LIKE FLOWERS HAKONECHLOA GOLDEN JAPANESE i GALLON PERENNIAL CLINGING GRASS; 14" HIGH - EVERGREEN; OPEN FORM, PURPLE FLOWERS ' MACRA AUREOLA' FOREST GRASS - - TIBOUCHINA URVILLEANA PRINCESS FLOWER 5 GALLON HARDENBERGA VIOLACEA HAPPY WANDERER 1 GALLON EVERGREEN. SHRUB:, WHITE AND PURPLE FLOWERS TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIOES STAR JASMINE 1 GALLON EVERGREEN GROUNDCOVER; WHITE FLOWERS SPRING /SUMMER PLANT LIST HEUCTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS BLUE OAT GRASS 5 GALLON - PERENNIAL GRASS; BRIGHT BLUE TROPAEOLUM MAJUS NASTURTIUM 1 GALLON PERENNIAL; TRAILING STEMS; ORANGE FLOWERS NOTES, LEGEND HEMEROCAWS HYBRID DAYULY 1 GALLON EVERGREEN; ARCHING SWORDLIKE LEAVES; 'STELLA D'ORO' YELLOW FLOWERS THROUGHOUT WARM WEATHER - VERBENA HYBRIDA GARDEN VERBENA F.G.12" O.C. PERENNIAL; MULTIPLE COLORS ., HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA TOYON 5 GALLON EVERGREEN; DENSE SHRUB, THICK LEATHERY GLOSSY LEAVES WHITE FLOWERS JUNE JULY, RED BERRIES NOV –JAN VIOLA WITTROCKIANA PANSY 4" POTS 10" O.C. PERENNIAL; SUMMER FALL BLOOM HIBISCUS ROSA SINENS15 ROSE OF SHARON 5 GALLON - EVERGREEN, BRIGHT LARGE FLOWERS - - - NORTH L-2.0 HOSTA DECORATA PLANTAIN LILY I GALLON PERENNIAL; BEAUTIFUL HEART SHAPED, SHINY LEAVES VIBURNUM DAVIDII DAVID VIBURNUM 1 GALLON EVERGREEN; WHITE FLOWERS GROW WELL IN SHADE VIBURNUM TINUS LAURUSTINUS - I GALLON EVERGREEN; PINK/ WHITE FLOWERS IRLS DOUn ASIANA - DOIICIAS IRIS i GALLON FVFRCRFFN: RI.I1F FIDWFRS - • • e y6 4ya . °ee `Y LU RESIDENCE 13426 SURREY LANE SARATOGA, CA VICINITY MAP W N.T.S. ABBREVIATIONS - AB AGGREGATE BASE AC ASPHALT CONCRETE AD AREA DRAIN ATE) ATRIUM DRAIN BFPD BACK FLOW PREVENTOR DEVICE B BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION CB CATCH BASIN CL CENTER LINE CS CRAWL SPACE ELEVATION CIP CAST IRON PIPE CONC CONCRETE DO DECK DRAIN DDCV DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK VALVE DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE DS ROOF DOWN SPOUT DW DOMESTIC WATER LINE DWI- DRYWELL CATCH BASIN DWY DRIVEWAY (E) EXISTING EG EXISTING GRADE ELEC ELECTRICAL EM ELECTRICAL METER EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT FC FACE OF CURB ELEVATION FDC FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION FF FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FG FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION FL FLOW LINE ELEVATION FM FORCE MAIN LINE FS FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION FP FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATION FIN FIRE WATER LINE GB GRADE BREAK GM GAS METER GR GRATE ELEVATION GV GATE VALVE HP HIGH POINT INV INVERT ELEVATION JT JOINT TRENCH ,P JOINT POLE LD LANDSCAPE DRAIN LF LINEAR FEET LP LOW POINT (N) NEW PA PLANTING AREA PIV POST INDICATOR VALVE PKG PARKING POC POINT OF CONNECTION RET RETAINING WALL RIM RIM ELEVATION S . SLOPE SAP SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SBD STORM SUB DRAIN SBDCO STORM SUB DRAIN CLEANOUT SO STORM DRAIN SDCO STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT SGR SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT SICB SIDE INLET CATCH BASIN SLP SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS SPP SEE PLUMBING PLANS SS SANITARY SEWER SSCO SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT SSP SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS TW TOP OF WALL ELEVATION TYP TYPICAL USD UNDERSLAB DRAIN VD PIPE VERTICAL DROP W DOMESTIC WATER LINE WM WATER METER IMPERVIOUS ZONING: ZONE: R- 1- 40,000 MAX IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE: 35% IMPERVIOUS QUANTITIES: NET AREA 42,043 S.F. PERVIOUS AREA 27,754 S.F. IMPERVIOUS AREA 14,289 S.F. X IMPERVIOUS 34% AVERAGE SLOPE: S 0.002296 X I X L I a INTERVAL OF CONTOUR L LENGTH OF CONTOUR S = 0.002296 X V X 86.25' S = 19.8% LOCATION MAP N.T.S. m 0 v 0 0 0 N E _� N u w o, ° 0 o cca� oy a� 1— • ay a N a J W I SHEET INDEX Q J SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION LL r W >- Check: TRL . W V W LEGEND- W V C1.1 NOTES = Z Q C2.1 GRADING PLAN ` C3.1 UTIUTY PLAN W j 1G - C4.1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C5.1 DETAIL SHEET W N N O J Q EXISTING PROPOSED —S" 5S— —aESS:— SANITARY SEWER —10 5D— —10* SD— STORM DRAIN —F FORCE MAN p PRE SERMCE Z —D" W— DOMESTIC WATER SERMCE —!RR— �— gam IRRIGATION SERMQ —G— NATURAL GAS °i �• q — T —T— TELEPHONE C 56734 —TV— TVYCABLE TV c - -E— ELECTRIC '\ r EXP.AE.�op —.R— —JT— JOINT TRENCH -= —0 — —O/H— OVERHEAD WIRES >: —X— FENCE _ o CLEAN OUT TO GRADE FOUND MONUMENT DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK VALVE �.- •- POST INDICATOR VALVE DC DC VALVE o ® METER BOX -3.' -{} STREET UGRT • DRAIN ❑® CATCH BASIN A FIRE HYDRANT j.' A FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION Q $ BENCHMARK �lil MANHOLE a— �— SIGN ® TREE NUMBER PER ARBORIST REPORT TZ SPLASH BLOCK (.� r —DETAIL C5.1 _SHEET LOCATION O W Z SHEET INDEX Q J SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION LL r W >- Check: TRL . W V W CO.0 TITLE SHEET W V C1.1 NOTES = Z Q C2.1 GRADING PLAN ` C3.1 UTIUTY PLAN W j 1G - C4.1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C5.1 DETAIL SHEET W N N O J Q N F-JMfQ Date: 02/15/08 Scale: AS SHOWN pe_227- - 0 01! i o Design: SPL Check: TRL Drawing Number. CO.O O ua o 1m 0 20 40 I -ii OF GRAPHIC SCALE ' LTI No. 07 -9854 • S 3 qYo ies CAUTION- 1 . CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT FOR LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION- PHONE (800) 642 -2444. - CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS SITE. GENERAL SITE NOTES - 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING ON THIS WORK. AND CONSIDER THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SITE CONSTRAINTS IN THE BID. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE IN THE POSSESSION OF AND FAMILIAR WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING AGENCIES STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING OF A BID. 2. ALL WORK ONSITE AND IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL CONFORM TO ALL APPUCABLE GOVERNING AGENCIES STANDARD DETAILS @ SPECIFICATIONS. 3. PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK, AND AFTER INITIAL HORIZONTAL CONTROL STAKING, CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD CHECK ALL ELEVATIONS MARKED WITH (E) AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES GREATER THAN 0.05' TO PROJECT MANAGER. 4• DAMAGE TO ANY EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS, UTILITIES AND /OR SERVICES TO REMAIN SHALL BE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND /OR REPLACE IN KIND. 5. CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE CLIENT, THE CONSULTING ENGINEER AND THE CITY HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL UABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION NTH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGUGENCE OF THE CLIENT OR THE CONSULTING ENGINEER. 6. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE NTH THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IF ONE EXISTS EXISTING CONDITIONS - 1. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PERFORMED BY BILLY UN AND ASSOCIATES ON APRIL 8, 2007 (JOB /325 -07). GRADES ENCOUNTERED, ON SITE MAY VARY FROM THOSE SHOWN. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE PLANS AND CONDUCT FIELD INVESTIGATIONS AS REQUIRED TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE. 2. CUENT SHALL HOLD HARMLESS LT FROM ANY AND ALL OCCURRENCES RESULTING FROM THE INACCURACY OF THE CLIENT SUPPLIED TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY (AS PREPARED BY OTHERS). SURVEYOR'S NOTES - UTLRY NOTE• THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES AND RECORD INFORMATION. LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY VARY FROM LOCATIONS SHOW HEREON. ADDITIONAL BURIED UTUTIES/STRUCTURES MAY EXIST. NO EXCAVATIONS WERE MADE DURING THE PROGRESS OF THIS SURVEY TO LOCATE BURIED UTIUTIES/STRUCTURES. PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS, - UTIUTY COMPANIES AND THE CITY ENGINEERS OFFICES SHOULD BE CONTACTED AND NOTIFIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TREE NOTE• TREE CANOPIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE 11A7318 OF BEATING THE BEARINGS BETWEEN TWO FOUND MONUMENTS ON SURREY LANE AS SHOWN ON "TRACT NO. 1413, HILLS OF SARATOGA', FILED IN BOOK 55 OF MAPS, PAGE 55, SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDS, TAKEN AS NORTH 45d35'48* WEST. MONUMENT ON THE CENTER LINE OF SURREY LANE AT THE BEGINNING OF CURVE IN FRONT OF HOUSE NUMBER 13414. ELEVATION = 436.78. DEMOLITION NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR IS TO COMPLY NTH ALL GENERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS INVOLVING THE REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL(S). 2. CONTRACTORS BID IS TO INCLUDE ALL VISIBLE SURFACE AND ALL SUBSURFACE FEATURES IDENTIFIED TO BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED IN THESE DOCUMENTS 3, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A SITE INSPECTION TO FULLY ACKNOWLEDGE THE EXTENT OF THE DEMOLITION WORK. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY AND ALL PERMITS NECESSARY FOR ENCROACHMENT, GRADING, DEMOLITION, AND DISPOSAL OF SAID MATERIALS AS REQUIRED BY PRIVATE, LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY ALL FEES ASSOCIATED NTH THE DEMOLITION WORK. 5. BACKFlLL ALL DEPRESSIONS AND TRENCHES FROM DEMOLITION TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 6. REMOVAL OF LANDSCAPING SHALL INCLUDE ROOTS AND ORGANIC MATERIALS TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 7. PRIOR TO BEGINNING DEMOLITION WORK ACTIVITIES, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES OUTLINED IN THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN k DETAILS. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL SAFETY DEVICES, AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMANCE TO ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS LAWS AND REGULATIONS. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT FROM DAMAGE ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN. ANY ITEMS DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR OR HIS AGENTS OR ANY ITEMS REMOVED FOR HIS USE SHALL BE REPLACED IN EQUAL OR BETTER CONDITION AS APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S - REPRESENTATIVE. 10. COORDINATE NTH ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL LANDSCAPING AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR UTILITY SHUT- DOWN/DISCONNECT LOCATIONS. CONTRACTOR IS TO SHUT OFF ALL UTIUTIES AS NECESSARY PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS NTH THE CLIENT. 00 NOT INTERRUPT SERVICES TO ADJACENT OFF -SITE OWNERS ALSO SEE ARCHITECTURAL PUNS FOR ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION SCOPE OF WORK. 11: THIS PLAN IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A COMPLETE CATALOGUE OF ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES AND UTIUTIES. THIS PLAN INTENDS TO DISCLOSE GENERAL INFORMATION KNOWN BY THE ENGINEER AND TO SHOW THE LIMITS OF THE AREA WHERE WORK WLL BE PERFORMED. THIS PUN SHOWS THE NS AND FUTURES TAKEN FROM A FIELD SURVEY, FIELD INVESTIGATIONS Y REFLECT AVAILABLE INFORMATION. THIS PUN MAY OR MAY NOT ACCURATELY THEY THE TYPE OR EXTENT XI THE ITEMS TO BE ENCOUNTERED AS THEY ACTUALLY EXIST. WHERE EXISTING FEATURES ARE NOT SHOWN, IT IS NOT TRACED THAT THEY ARE NOT TO BE DEMOLISHED N REMOVED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM A THOROUGH FIELD INVESTIGATION AND RENEW OF THE SITE WITHIN THE LIMIT I WORK SHOWN IN THIS PLAN SET TO DETERMINE THE TYPE, QUANTITY AND EXTENT ANY AND ALL (TEE NS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY SIB RESPONBLE FOR DETERMINING THE EXTENT OF EXISTING STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES VE TIES AND QUANTITY OF WORK INVOLD IN N REMOVING THESE ITEMS FROM THE SITE _ TREE /PLANT PROTECTION NOTES- 1. PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION ON SITE, CONTRACTOR SHALL IDENTIFY AND PROTECT EXISTING TREES AND PLANTS DESIGNATED AS TO REMAIN. - - 2. PROTECT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN FROM SPILLED CHEMICALS, FUEL OIL, MOTOR OIL, GASOLINE AND ALL OTHER CHEMICALLY INJURIOUS MATERIAL; AS WELL AS FROM PUDDLING OR CONTINUOUSLY RUNNING WATER. SHOULD A SPILL OCCUR, STOP WORK IN THAT AREA AND CONTACT THE CITY'S ENGINEER/INSPECTOR IMMEDIATELY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MITIGATE DAMAGE FROM SPILLED MATERIAL -' AS WELL AS MATERIAL CLEAN UP. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL TREES DESIGNATED TO REMAIN AND FOR MAINTENANCE OF RELOCATED TREES STOCKPILED DURING CONSTRUCTION. .CONTRACTOR NLL BE REQUIRED TO REPLACE TREES THAT DIE DUE TO LACK OF MAINTENANCE HORIZONTAL CONTROL NOTES - 1 ALL DIMENSIONS ON THE PUNS ARE IN FEET OR DECIMALS THEREOF UNLESS SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT AS FEET AND INCHES. PAVEMENT SECTION - 1. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING SLAB SECTIONS AND PAD PREPARATIONS. 2. SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ALL FLATWORK AND VEHICULAR PAVEMENT SECTIONS AND BASE REQUIREMENTS 3. THE FINAL OR SURFACE LAYER OF ASPHALT CONCRETE SHALL NOT BE PLACED UNTIL ALL ON -SITE IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED, INCLUDING ALL GRADING, AND ALL UNACCEPTABLE CONCRETE WORK HAS BEEN REMOVED AND REPLACED, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER AND /OR DEVELOPERS CIVIL ENGINEER. 4. ALL PAVING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26 'AGGREGATE BASE' AND SECTION 39 'ASPHALT CONCRETE' PER LATEST EDITION OF CALTRAN STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SITE MAINTENANCE- 1. REMOVE ALL DIRT, GRAVEL RUBBISH, REFUSE, AND GREEN WASTE FROM STREET PAVEMENT AND STORM DRAINS ADJOINING THE SITE LIMIT CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROUTES ONTO THE SITE AND PLACE GRAVEL PADS AT THESE LOCATIONS DO NOT DRIVE VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT OFF THE PAVED OR GRAVEED AREAS DURING NET WEATHER. 2. SWEEP OR VACUUM THE STREET PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALKS ADJOINING THE PROJECT SITE AND THE ON -SITE PAVED AREAS ON A DAILY BASIS. SCRAPE CAKED -ON MUD AND DIRT FROM THESE AREAS BEFORE SWEEPING. CORNERS AND HARD TO REACH AREAS SHALL BE SWEPT MANUALLY. 3. CREATE A CONTAINED AND COVERED AREA ON THE SITE FOR THE STORAGE OF BAGS, CEMENT, PAINTS, OILS, FERTIUZERS, PESTICIDES, OR OTHER MATERIALS USED ON THE SITE THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL OF BEING DISCHARGED INTO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM THROUGH EITHER BEING NND -BLOWN OR IN THE EVENT OF A MATERIAL SPILL 4. NEVER CLEAN MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT OR TOOLS INTO A STREET, GUTTER OR STORM DRAIN. 5. ENSURE THAT CEMENT TRUCKS, PAINTERS, OR STUCCO/PLASTER FINISHING CONTRACTORS DO NOT DISCHARGE WASH WATER FROM EQUIPMENT, TOOLS OR RINSE CONTAINERS INTO GUTTERS OR DRAINS 6. UPON PROJECT COMLETION THE CLIENT SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE TO ROUTINELY INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ALL ON -SITE STORM DRAIN FACILITIES STORM DRAIN SYSTEM SHALL BE CLEANED AND /OR FLUSHED ON A BI- ANNUAL BASIS OR AS FOUND NECESSARY. GRADING NOTES- 1. PROVIDE POSITIVE SURFACE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES BY SLOPING THE FINISHED GROUND SURFACE AT LEAST 4 INCHES IN A HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF 5 FEET, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. SLOPE PORCHES, LANDINGS AND TERRACES 2% (1/4- PER FOOT) AWAY FROM, STRUCTURES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS 2. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL CONTROLLING DIMENSIONS NTH ARCHITECTURAL PUNS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES BASED ON THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION AND THE PROPOSED SURFACE THICKNESSES AND BASE THE BID ACCORDINGLY. NOTE THAT A SEPARATE DEMOLITION CONTRACT HAS BEEN ISSUED TO TAKE THE STE FROM THE WAY IT IS AT THE TIME OF THE BID TO THE CONDITIONS DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS. ANY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE STATE IN MUCH THE SITE IS DELIVERED TO THE CONTRACTOR AND THESE DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE NOTED TO THE ENGINEER /ARCHITECT. 4. ALL FILL SHALL BE COMPACTED PER THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND COMPLY NTH 'TTHE CUENT'S TESTING AGENCY TO TAKE THE APPROPRIATE TESTS TO VERIFY COMPACTION VALUES. 5. IMPORT SOILS SHOULD MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS REPORT AND SPECIFICATIONS. 6. COORDINATE THE PLACEMENT OF ALL SLEEVES FOR LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION (WATER AND CONTROL WIRING) AND SITE LIGHTING PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF ANY ASPHALT, BASEROCK OR CONCRETE SURFACING. SEE LANDSCAPING AND SITE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 7. DO NOT ADJUST GRADES ON THIS PLAN WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER /ARCHITECT. 8. SITE STRIPPINGS THAT CONTAIN ONLY ORGANIC MATERIAL (NO DEBRIS:' TRASH, BROKEN CONIC. OR ROCKS GREATER THAN 1" IN DIAMETER) MAY BE USED IN LANDSCAPE AREAS, EXCEPT FOR AREAS IDENTIFIED AS IMPORT TOP SOIL BY THE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. EXCESS STRIPPINGS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SITE. 9. ROUGH GRADING TO BE WITHIN 0.1' AND FINISH GRADES ARE TO BE WITHIN 0.05', HOWEVER CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT CONSTRUCT ANY IMPROVEMENTS THAT WILL CAUSE WATER TO POND OR NOT MEET REQUIREMENTS IN GRADING NOTE /1. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CARE TO CONFORM TO THE LINES, GRADES, SECTIONS, AND DIMENSIONS AS SET FORTH ON THESE PUNS. ALL GRADED AREAS SHALL CONFORM TO THE VERTICAL ELEVATIONS SHOWN WITH A TOLERANCE OF ONE -TENTH OF A FOOT. WHERE GRADED AREAS DO NOT CONFORM TO THESE TOLERANCES, THE CONTRACTORS SHALL BE REWIRED TO DO CORRECTIVE GRADING. AT NO EXTRA COST TO THE CLIENT. - - 11. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONFIRM THE GROUND ELEVATIONS AND OVERALL TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AS TO THE ACCURACY BETWEEN THE WORK SET FORTH ON THESE PLANS AND THE WORK IN THE FIELD. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO TH E TTE A NnON OF THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND ENGINEER WRITING PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION WHICH MAY Y REQUIRE CHANGES IN DESIGN ' AND /OR AFFECT THE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES. 12. TRENCHES SHALL NOT BE LEFT OPEN OVERNIGHT IN EXISTING PUBLIC STREET AREAS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BACKFlLL TRENCHES, OR PUCE STEEL PLATING NTH ADEQUATE CUTBACK TO PREVENT SHIFTING OF STEEL PLATE AND /OR HOT -MIX ASPHALT REQUIRED TO PROTECT OPEN TRENCHES AT THE END OF THE WORKING DAY. NPDES REQUIREMENTS 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION ON OFF -SITE OR ON -SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL ADHERE TO NPDES (NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM) BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO PREVENT DELETERIOUS MATERIALS OR POLLUTANTS FROM ENTERING THE CITY OR COUNTY STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS. 2. ERODED SEDIMENTS AND OTHER POLLUTANTS MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE AND MAY NOT BE TRANSPORTED FROM THE SITE VIA SHEET FLOW, .SWALES. AREA DRAINS. NATURAL DRAINAGE COURSES. OR VIAND. 3. STOCKPILES OF EARTH AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS MUST BE PROTECTED FROM BEING TRANSPORTED FROM THE SITE BY THE FORCES OF WIND OR WATER. 4, FUELS, OILS, SOLVENTS, AND OTHER TOXIC MATERIALS MUST BE STORED IN ACCORDANCE NTH THEIR LISTING AND ARE NOT TO CONTAMINATE THE SOIL AND SURFACE WATERS. ALL APPROVED STORAGE CONTAINERS ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM THE WEATHER, SPILLS MUST BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY AND DISPOSED OF IN A PROPER MANNER. SPILLS MAY NOT BE WASHED INTO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. 5. EXCESS OR WASTE CONCRETE MAY NOT BE WASHED INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY OR ANY OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEM. PROVISIONS SHALL BE MADE TO RETAIN CONCRETE WASTES ON SITE UNTIL THEY CAN BE DISPOSED OF AS SOLID WASTE. 6. TRASH AND CONSTRUCTION RELATED SOLID WASTES MUST BE DEPOSITED INTO A COVERED RECEPTACLE TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION AND DISPERSAL BY WIND. 7, SEDIMENTS AND OTHER MATERIALS MAY NOT BE TRACKED FROM THE SITE BY VEHICLE TRAFFIC. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ROADWAYS MUST BE STABILIZED SO AS TO INHIBIT SEDIMENTS FROM BEING DEPOSITED INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY. ACCIDENTAL DEPOSITIONS MUST BE SWEPT UP IMMEDIATELY AND MAY NOT BE WASHED DOWN BY RAIN OR OTHER MEANS B. ANY SLOPES WITH DISTURBED SOILS OR DENUDED OF VEGETATION MUST BE STABILIZED SO AS TO INHIBIT EROSION BY WIND AND WATER 9. CLEAN UP ALL SPILLS USING DRY METHODS. 10. SWEEP ALL GUTTERS AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. GUTTERS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AFTER LEAVING CONSTRUCTION SITE. 11, CALL 911 IN CASE OF A HAZARDOUS SPILL 12. BMP'S AS OUTLINED IN, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CALIFORNIA STORM WATER QUALI TY TASK FORCE, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, JANUARY 2003, OR THE LATEST REVISED EDITION, MAY APPLY DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT (ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED IF DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY CITY INSPECTORS). 13. UPON SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE WORK, THE ENTIRE WORK SITE SHALL BE CLEANED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND LEFT NTH A SMOOTH AND NEATLY GRADED SURFACE FREE OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE, RUBBISH, AND DEBRIS OF ANY NATURE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES - 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME THE CONCEPTS ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, IF PROVIDED, ARE SCHEMATIC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS, THE FULL EXTENT OF WHICH ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EXACT DESIGN AND EXTENT OF THE EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM SO THAT IT WORKS NTH THE CONTRACTOR'S INTENDED USE AND MANAGEMENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE 2. ALL EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND REPAIRED, AS REQUIRED, AT THE CONCLUSION OF EACH WORKING DAY DURING THE RAINY SEASON. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES AND MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS PRIOR TO ANTICIPATED STORMS AND AT REASONABLE INTERVALS DURING STORMS OF EXTENDED DURATION. REPAIRS TO DAMAGED FACILITIES SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY UPON DISCOVERY. 3. AS SOON AS PRACTICAL FOLLOWING EACH STORM, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANY ACCUMULATION OF SILT OR DEBRIS FROM THE EROSION CONTROL SEDIMENT BASINS AND SHALL CLEAR THE OUTLET PIPES OF ANY BLOCKAGE. 4. STOCKPILED MATERIAL SHALL BE COVERED NTH VISQUEEN OR A TARPAULIN UNTIL THE MATERIAL IS REMOVED FROM THE SITE. ANY REMAINING BARE SOIL THAT EXISTS AFTER THE STOCKPILE HAS BEEN REMOVED SHALL BE COVERED UNTIL A NATURAL GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED OR IT MAY BE SEEDED OR PUNTED TO PROVIDE GROUND COVER PRIOR TO THE FALL RAINY SEASON. 5. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CLEARING, GRADING, OR EXCAVATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE CLIENT HAS SUBMITTED TO THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD A NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI) FOR COVERAGE UNDER THE STATE CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER GENERAL PERMIT, IF REQUIRED BY THE STATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A COPY OF THE NOI ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 6. NECESSARY MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE AND STOCKPILED AT CONVENIENT LOCATIONS TO FACILITATE RAPID CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORARY DEVICES WHEN RAIN IS IMMINENT. 7. PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND UNDISTURBED AREAS FROM CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS USING VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, SEDIMENT BARRIERS OR FILTERS, DIKES, MULCHING OR OTHER MEASURES AS APPROPRIATE. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ADJACENT STREETS IN A NEAT, CLEAN, DUST FREE AND SANITARY CONDITION AT ALL TIMES AND TO THE 'SATISFACTION OF THE CITY INSPECTOR. THE ADJACENT STREET SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN OF DEBRIS, WITH DUST AND OTHER NUISANCE BEING CONTROLLED AT ALL TIMES. DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CLEAN UP ON ADJACENT STREETS AFFECTED BY THEIR CONSTRUCTION, METHOD OF STREET CLEANING SHALL BE BY DRY SWEEPING OF ALL PAVED AREAS. NO STOCKPILING OF BUILDING MATERIALS WITHIN THE CITYS RIGHT -OF -WAY IS PERMITTED. 9. ALL EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 10. PROTECT DOWN SLOPE DRAINAGE COURSES, STREAMS AND STORM DRAINS NTH D SAND BAGS ROCK FILLED .TEMPORARY DRAINAGE SWALES, SILT FENCES, EARTH BERMS, STORM DRAIN INLET FILTERS AND /OR STRAW BALES USED ONLY IN CONJUNCTION NTH PROPERLY INSTALLED SILT FENCES SITE FENCE NOTES- 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AROUND THE ENTIRE AREA OF DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING ALL STAGING, STORAGE, CONSTRUCTION OFFICE AND LAYDOWN AREAS. 2. CONSTRUCTON FENCE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF A 6' HIGH GALVANIZED CHAIN LINK WITH GREEN WNDSCREEN FABRIC ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE FENCE. 3. CONSTRUCTION FENCE ADDRESSED IN THESE NOTES IS ONLY FOR VISUAL CONFORMANCE OF THIS CONSTRUCTION SITE TO THE CITY STANDARDS. 'CONTRACTOR MAY BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FENCING, BARRICADES.OR OTHER SAFETY DEVICES TO KEEP THE SITE SECURE AND SAFE. DUST CONTROL 1. WATER TRUCKS SHALL BE PRESENT AND IN USE AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE SUBJECT TO BLOWING DUST SHALL BE WATERED AS OFTEN AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CUENT/NSPECTOR IN ORDER TO INSURE PROPER CONTROL OF BLOWING DUST FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 2. ALL PUBLIC STREETS AND MEDIANS SOILED OR UTTERED DUE TO THIS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE CLEANED AND SWEPT ON A DAILY BASS DURING THE WORK WEEK, OR AS OFTEN AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CLJENT/INSPECTOR, OR TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITYS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 3. ALL TRUCKS HAULING SOIL SAND, AND OTHER LOOSE MATERIALS SHALL BE COVERED WITH TARPAULINS OR OTHER EFFECTIVE COVERS. 4. WHEEL WASHERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND USED TO CLEAN ALL TRUCKS AND EQUIPMENT LEAVING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. IF WHEEL WASHERS CANNOT BE INSTALLED, TIRES OR TRACKS OF ALL TRUCKS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE WASHED OFF BEFORE LEAVING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMONSTRATE DUST SUPPRESSION MEASURES, SUCH AS REGULAR WATERING, WHICH SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED TO REDUCE EMISSIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION AND GRADING IN A MANNER MEETING THE APPROVAL OF THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. THIS SHALL ASSST IN REDUCING SHORT -TERM IMPACTS FROM PARTICLES WHICH COULD RESULT IN NUISANCES THAT ARE PROHIBITED BY RULE 403 (FUGITIVE DUST). 6. GRADING OR ANY OTHER OPERATIONS THAT CREATES DUST SHALL BE STOPPED IMMEDIATELY IF DUST AFFECTS ADJACENT PROPERTIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT DUST CONTROL FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT SITE IN ACCORDANCE NTH THE PROJECT SWPPP AT ALL TIMES THE SITE SHALL BE SPRINKLERED AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT DUST NUISANCE IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACTOR NEGLECTS TO USE ADEQUATE MEASURES TO CONTROL DUST, THE CLIENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TAKE WHATEVER MEASURES ARE NECESSARY TO CONTROL DUST AND CHARGE THE COST TO THE CONTRACTOR. 7. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL MEASURES AND FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS. ALL GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE SUSPENDED DURING SECOND (OR WORSE) STAGE SMOG ALERTS. GENERAL UTILITY SYSTEM NOTES 1. ALL TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFILLED PER THE SPECIFICATIONS NTH APPROPRIATE TESTS BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO VERIFY COMPACTION VALUES 2. CLEAN OUTS, CATCH BASINS AND AREA DRAINS ARE TO BE ACCURATELY LOCATED BY THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO THE BUILDING, FLATWORK, ROOF DRAINS, AND /OR CURB LAYOUT, NOT BY THE LENGTH OF PIPE SPECIFIED IN THE DRAWINGS (WHICH IS APPROXIMATE). 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LOCATION OF ABOVE GROUND UTUTY EQUIPMENT ( BACKFLOW PREVENTOR, SATELLITE DISH, TRANSFORMER, GAS METER, ETC.) AND MEET NTH CLIENT TO REVIEW LOCATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUST SPECIFICALLY AGREE NTH LOCATION PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE INSTALLATION. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AN ACCURATE COMPOSITE UnUTY PLAN THAT TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS DETERMINED DURING THE DEMOLITION WORK, THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE CIVIL DRAWINGS, AND THE SITE POWER, CONDUITS AND LIGHTING SHOWN ON THE ELECTRICAL PLANS. THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE INCLUDED AS DESIGNED BY THE DESIGN/BUILD UNDERGROUND FIRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR. 5. CATHODIC PROTECTION MAY BE REQUIRED ON ALL METALLIC FITTINGS AND ASSEMBLIES THAT ARE IN CONTACT NTH THE SOIL IF RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO FULLY ENGINEER AND INSTALL THIS SYSTEM AND COORDINATE ANODE AND TEST STATION LOCATIONS WITH OWNER'S PROJECT MANAGER. 6. COMPLETE SYSTEMS: ALL UTILITY SYSTEMS ARE DELINEATED IN A SCHEMATIC MANNER ON THESE PLANS. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE ALL FITTINGS. ACCESSORIES AND WORK NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE UTILITY SYSTEM SO THAT IT IS FULLY FUNCTIONING FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED. 7. UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES OR STRUCTURES ARE SHOWN IN THEIR APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS AND EXTENT BASED UPON RECORD INFORMATION. LOCATIONS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN VERIFIED IN THE FIELD AND NO GUARANTEE IS MADE TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATION SHOWN. THE CLIENT, BY ACCEPTING THESE PLANS OR PROCEEDING WITH IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT THERETO, AGREES TO ASSUME LIABILITY AND TO HOLD UNDERSIGNED HARMLESS FOR ANY DAMAGES RESULTING FROM THE EXISTENCE OF UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES OR STRUCTURES NOT REPORTED TO THE UNDERSIGNED; NOT INDICATED ON THE PUBLIC RECORDS EXAMINED, LOCATED AT VARIANCE WITH THOSE REPORTED OR SHOWN ON RECORDS EXAMINED. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR STORM DRAIN AND SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK. ALL WORK FOR STORM AND SANITARY SEWER INSTALLATION SHALL BEGIN AT THE DOWNSTREAM CONNECTION POINT. THIS NLL ALLOW FOR ANY NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS TO BE MADE PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE ENTIRE LINE. IF THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO BEGIN AT THE DOWNSTREAM CONNECTION POINT AND WORKS UP STREAM, HE SHALL PROCEED AT HIS OWN RISK AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADJUSTMENTS NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF SANITARY SEWER LATERAL NTH OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 9. EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGS OF NEW PIPELINE ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. GAS, WATER AND SEWER SERVICE LATERALS ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE TYPE, SIZE, LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL THE UTILITY CROSSING (BOTH MAINS AND LATERALS) ARE CORRECT AS SHOWN. NO GUARANTEE IS MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES (BOTH MAINS AND LATERALS) ARE SHOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CAUTION MEN EXCAVATING AND SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES (BOTH MAINS AND LATERALS) FROM DAMAGE DUE TO HIS OPERATION. 10. VERTICAL SEPARATION REOUIREMENTS: A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) INCHES VERTICAL CLEARANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN CROSSING UTILITY PIPES, EXCEPT THAT THE MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER PIPELINES SHALL BE 12 INCHES AND ALL NEW WATER PIPES SHALL BE TYPICALLY INSTALLED TO CROSS ABOVE /OVER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPELINES. WHERE NEW WATER PIPELINES ARE REQUIRED TO CROSS UNDER EXISTING AND /OR NEW SANITARY SEWER PIPELINES, THE MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION SHALL BE 12 INCHES. WATER LINE PIPE ENDS SHALL BE INSTALLED NO CLOSER THAN 10' MINIMUM - HORIZONTAL DISTANCE FROM CENTERUNE OF UTILITY CROSSINGS, WHERE FEASIBLE. HORIZONTAL SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS: A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN NEW PIPELINES AND ANY EXISTING UTIUTIES SHALL BE 5' FEET, EXCEPT THAT THE MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWER PIPELINES SHALL BE 10' MINIMUM UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.' A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN NEW PIPELINES E ELI S AND E ' JOINT TRENCH SHALL BE 5 FEET. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING APPROPRIATE UTIUTIES AND REQUESTING VERIFICATION OF SERVICE. POINTS, FIELD VERIFICATION OF LOCATION, SZE, DEPTH, ETC. FOR ALL THEIR FACILITIES AND TO COORDINATE WORK SCHEDULES. 12. ANY EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES TO BE ABANDONED, SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM WITHIN THE PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE AND THEIR ENDS CAPPED OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING ENVELOPE. STORM DRAIN NOTES, 1.. PRIVATE STORM DRAIN LINE 4-INCH THROUGH 12 -INCH WITH A MINIMUM' OF TWO (2) FEET OF COVER IN NON - TRAFFIC AREAS SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 35 WHITE PIPE AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM DESIGNATION D 3034 -73 WITH GLUED JOINTS. ALL DIRECTION CHANGES SHALL BE MADE WITH A WYE CONNECTION OR LONG SWEEP ELBOWS, REGULAR ELBOWS AND TEE'a ARE PROHIBITED. 2. PRIVATE STORM DRAIN LINE 6 -INCH THROUGH 12 -INCH NTH LESS THAN THREE (3) FEET OF COVER IN VEHICULAR TRAFFIC AREAS SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) C900, RATED FOR 150 PSI CLASS PIPE. PROVIDE AND INSTALL STORM DRAIN' MARKER TAPE FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF PIPE TRENCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH .CITY STANDARDS ALL DIRECTION CHANGES SHALL BE MADE NTH A WYE CONNECTION OR LONG SWEEP ELBOWS, REGULAR ELBOWS AND TEE'e ARE PROHIBITED. 3. ALL AREA DRAINS AND CATCH BASINS GRATES WITHIN PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBLE AREAS SHALL MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS. 4. ALL TRENCHES SHALL BE BACIKFTLLED PER THE SPECIFICATIONS WITH APPROPRIATE TESTS BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO VERIFY COMPACTION VALUES 5. FOR GRAVITY FLOW SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY (POTHOLE IF NECESSARY) SIZE, MATERIAL LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL SYSTEMS THAT ARE TO BE CONNECTED TO OR CROSSED PRIOR TO THE TRENCHING OR INSTALLATION OF ANY GRAVITY FLOW SYSTEM. 6. DRAINS SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE THE FINAL. NUMBER AND LOCATION OF ALL DRAINS PLACEMENT AND NUMBER OF LANDSCAPING DRAINS ARE HIGHLY DEPENDENT ON GROUND COVER TYPE AND PLANT MATERIAL CONTRACTOR SHALL ADD ADDITIONAL AREA DRAINS AS NEEDED AND AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 7. INSTALL SEPARATE SUB -DRAIN SYSTEM BEHIND RETAINING WALLS PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND CONNECT TO STORM DRAIN SYSTEM AT JUNCTION BOX. B. ALL DOWN SPOUTS SHALL DISCHARGE DIRECTLY ON TO ADJACENT IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR SPLASH BLOCKS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS SEE ARCHITECTURE PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION OF THE DOWN SPOUTS SANITARY SEWER NOTES - 1., ALL SEWER WORK SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE NTH THE CITY OR APPROPRIATE SANITARY SEWER DISTRICT. 2. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE 4 -INCH THROUGH B-INCH SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) STIR 26 GREEN SEWER PIPE AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM DESIGNATION D 3034 -73 NTH CLUED JOINTS. ALL DIRECTION CHANGES SHALL BE MADE NTH A WYE CONNECTION, ELBOWS AND TEE'. ARE PROHIBITED. 3. ALL LATERALS SHALL HAVE A CLEANOU7 AT FACE OF BUILDING AND AS SHOWN ON PLANS PER THE CITY STANDARD OR APPROPRIATE SANITARY SEWER DISTRICT. 4. IF (E) SEWER LATERAL IS TO BE USED, CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM PRESSURE TEST ON (E) SEWER LATERAL AND SHALL PERFORM ANY NEEDED REPAIRS. EXTEND (N) OR (E) SEWER LINE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS SLOPED AT 2x MINIMUM. INSTALL ClEANOUT AT FACE OF BUILDING AND AT PROPERTY LINE. WATER SYSTEM NOTES- 1. MAINTAIN WATER LINES 10' AWAY FROM SANITARY SEWER LINES 2. WHERE WATER LINES HAVE TO CROSS SANITARY SEWER LINES, DO SO AT • P K 1JR, A� ritiliux,�U� JCR61.)N[ BOX '50 OBTAIN MENT 436.115 75 FS 715 _7 7% J? ANY 0 SUBUK UP BOX GR A DRIVE A '0 N y P!EMPU O�APOPR CONSTRUCTION A1T THE STREET. C TAO' PUPL4P 7KS ENGIN, -437-. (QUAtCZEDONIO NUNEZ, Ai '`p ��" \; - NO TW 9 GB FOR �t4 8)a68-1218 INFORMATION REGARDIN , i� GROUND COVER n OBTAINING AN ENCROAC MENT 0 436.15 RO(X67DI P XIVAGR�Q a PERMIT FS 00 2X 7.29 AM 437.15 .00 < 439 AA4 o, 441 .§t�3 TW 440.50 FS 0.5X GR-A+3.25 /j (8)6- RI oA G FS 441.96 440. n FG 442.�3 �4 FG 440.. FS 442.1 FS 444.71 FS 4422, .92 lw- -j wb, 7 ,49 � FS 7X VAWS SEAT WALL FS 441. 19 SLOPE SLKb` FS 444.86 q",) (5)6- MJSERS 9 RISERS 96 FS/FG Z,) (2)6" RISERS Fa _;MASS o -ix l -C) AM FS 44: -PROVIDE 1* UP AT 443.50 RESD84= IFF 446.00 FS 445.09 9 "Wk A (5!RJSER ti-VAR= FS 445.83 AM KA (2)6- fa GR 446.50 FS 445 IFF 448. if -I-X 44 445.a3 ZBO i 443. FS 445.. 3)6- F FS 445.30 BW 44233-, 7 3) ";M_ --____TW-447.6O CD BW 443.6M- " - A FIF 4.47.00 AT!] TW 44 \ 60 i-s a3 1W443.50• RIM 45q. L i"(5)/6- RIISFR v !E,L II _I r ' ' /� : ' � \'� i 4 V�6 pp E IS , T), c oy 13 439. r7- CO3 1442.00 ti n -13 SEE SHEETS CO.0 FOR TW LEGENDS 227 6 LA ao Q2> C,%734 0 10 20 GROUND COA-"' GRAPHIC SCALE 0.. --- CLEAN- OUT /Jo Cplt RIM 449.75 �0 a5 SIN LE -44 NEI 1.7% I ..h Imo/ `-- -�J / G`� - W W W .r W r W W W W -k- ZE DIE IN ❑ PROVIDE �1`0 AULO� Ai o', J OUND R .LAWN. ..5X -k . . . . . TW 464.30 w 280 FS 462 TW 485.5 . . . y . y . WSW .. . . . 00 .. .. . . . . . TW 466.00 TW 486.45 -BW 6 Q 4' 13W M4.9 p'D --GR 464. (7b _0 W ------- 0- PR 47 475. 7 GROUND MVER- 2% 0 W z \FS 46:5-00 A W >- 0 LU DID DO so 0 BW 461. v .(3 z < Z LU iR GR, t_9 3 G11 464.93 *93 � U) 0 �46 U) W (0 QF5_485_XI0 ;46 4% 6 D COVE :3 < CA -5 _1 TW Dote: 02/15/08 PO sco)e: 1, - 10' Design: SPL SERS Check; TRIL Drawing Number. C2.1 OF - - - - - - � --_LTI No. 07-9854 • • r r o x • ,4. 3m 4Ee �'�_ _+J i 4 �r u� _ ,' A+ ('OBI(✓ 1- 'KEj�\ / 1 - -�'- -- �-�_�,J� } _ , 45 n - - _,ip^ Ir f r h, _ �t\ a\ 1l 1 1- rr GRO} ' - - - -- _ 1ND COVER ' 90 a6 to 5. T. GR 43§6.0a t �v�All zi k�P ; JINV .00 I ` l I. ; �---- ��., \) �Q �-. .�,,� ,�_��. - j ✓X� mac, \ ,:r. b`l - rX �D.p iil-LIP V' - 1U, 6RWND COVER / / GR 436.15 + }` ,�_� j i \ INV 434.65 �� ;, ✓kyi' :� ^�f" GRl)437.00 \ F 1 ,, INV 43.r.B5- r � INV 439 INV 439.50 , ,k -r GR 439.92 INV 42 ��_ C<� / � ,b� . -:> 1 \ ��,: +u+ ✓��� l «.5 i D j ; �; ' �" % A7 ✓i,1 i N 440.80 9APAGE ^ - �� — ��� \ b,GS, � ,�0 `�` ✓i�ti HvU is • Vb �4- 43 36 ft-, r Alu \ + 5b \ IN M3.50 by s\ \.. LAWN 1 �J° _ I 441.52 INV 44200 " VARE9 Q\ �E x AM y F G u GR 446.50 Z ' r h�i�.i 1 j� \ bbl � ( j6 i'r L -�J .1 1 ' i 1 GROUND CO �0 i(� ANN WK P PR TO ANY I8 Ip r, G ;SCRAPING DANOPY OF A PROTECTED TREE, j a r -"b -�-�( r ^�E \ \ -�i\ '�, % `� �✓ \ 1 TIFlE AR80RI$�'SHALL BE RETAINED TO .h OUT q�Q PROVIDE SUP VI 9N`rAND RECOMMENDATIONS T 1 I :')/ .- K '�� ���� V �� ��"� / i � ' V NIV 448.25 (MINIMIZE POSSIBLEU i��h�`Lf / Ar a ��44tAAGE 7 jN AtEE. P,ROPDSED TRENC"&,J A _L THEN�BE APP OVED i � 4�Kll I �.� i -�- -- /� r� �. 1 � V 1. 9Y THE CITY OF_S�R� GA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' 1 ti h Va, ; �\ 1, t, ` ATD P(IOR TO COMMENDIN&., 11 \/ 448.58 \ 1M �� r o, �j' ADD A CC 1 - CA $ARATOGA ARQQRII��1 ATE SEW � , INV 44205 rte\ , r 1 w � � 'a�� � 1 J —\ _- -�-� -� 1 iii/% � �. 444,41- INV 443. !- � IiR -� I..� ��S`- --,� —/ l r r -L % T � • � —/ '� INV 44Z,9*'-' y`!_ _ rK ,� LAWN GROUND 631 I ' � 455 / 445 I r � A. \ T I ,I �i saOUND R _ LAVM DD DD \ ZGR 484:9,3 GR 484.93 — o Yom' II a_22 IN 8210 1'50 INV 4 1• 65 it U _464.RD. - -- - w — SEE SHEET S CO.'(,- 'CEGEN 5450 is o i i ! " /1 0 0 0 :3 0 E � w �o o � co cn o� a � 6 r, a o, N.., J v m o° N C 0 z 0 z e� 9 �y �c6 � � FExa llII:111�oi` ti 7� \1 w Z F Z J _jW> \\ Z Q W \� N 0 Date: 02/15/08 Scale: 1' - 10' SPL Check: TRL \Design: Drawing Number: ' C3.1 `� OF Lil No. 07 -9854 • U • T " x` s: 9 V ie< , 10' MIN. h 1 'A' 111 STEEL WOW POST MIN LENGTH 2' TYP. ALL AROUND PERIMETER AX WATER LEVEL T RILIP OUT WHEN IT REAM THIS LEVEL. 16� 1 Q2 AIERPR00F PLASTIC MEMBRANE, MIRAFI, MCF121Z OR APPROVED EQUAL SECTION 'A - A' FOR WASHOUT PIT n TEMPORARY WASHOUT PIT GALE : MD GALE PONDING HT. USE MRM PREFABRICATED SILT FENCE OR EQUAL ATTACH SECURELY TO UPSTREAM SIDE OF POST. SILT DEPOSIT ON GRAVEL FILLED DITCH L 8'•12' TRENCH WTH COMPACTED BACFU STANDARD DETAIL TRENCH WTH NAIVE BAC FI L PCNDING HT. ALTERNATE DETAIL TRENCH WIN GRAM! i ° 0 u� o o vii a' = m C U of u w m ° ° z O N r v ¢ � w J V I m EXTRA STRENGTH BLACK FILTER FABRIC NEEDED WTHOUT WIRE MESH SUPPORT 0 STEEL OR 25' MIN EXISTING ROAD WOOD POST 2' CRUSHED ROCI PIA C o 10 FT MAX SPACING WTH WRE SUPPORT FENCE '" • 6 FT MAX SPACING WITHOUT ME SUPPORT -" , •' FENCE FILTER FABRIC 4' MIN CRUSHED ROCK EXISTING GROUND tl4ffS NOTES 1. INSPECT AND REPAIR F04CE AFTER EACH STORM EVEN AND REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN p NECESSAR Y. 2 1. PROVIDE A FANNED STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO - 2 REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED TO AN AREA THAT WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE ' ACCOMMODATE THE TURNING RADIUS OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ON AND OFF THE PUBLIC STREET. SEDIMENT OFF-SIE AND CAN BE PERMANENTLY STABWIID. - 2. INSTALL ALONG NEW DWY CORRIDOR FOR THE FULL PROPOSED WDTH. 3. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON SLOPE CONTOURS TO MAXIMIZE PONDING EMCIENCY. .Q�ora.a�ow. ND scAr: SGIF : NQ SCALE n TEMPORARY GRAVEL SILT FENCE '1 *i C.T� y 2 EXP �� 4' MAX ADJACENT ROLLS SHALL TIGHTLY ABUT STRAW ROLLS MUST BE '� PLACED ALONG SLOPE VERTICAL SPAgNG �'T CONTOURS � DEPENDS SLOPE STEEPNESS. SEE NOTE NUMBER 2 SEDIMENT, ORGANIC MATTER, AND NATIVE SEEDS ARE CAPTURED BEHIND THE ROLLS. \, \ . NOTES: 0 1. STRAW ROLL INSTALLATION REQUIRES THE PLACEMENT LU - AND SECURE STAKING OF THE ROLL IN A TRENCH, 3' TO Z 3-4' 4' DEEP, DUG ON CONTOUR. RUNOFF MUST NOT BE �!\ ALLOWED TO RUN UNDER OR MOUND ROLL. 8' CIA MIN. 2. VERTICAL SPACING FOR SLOPE INSTALLATIONS: 0 ,Q ' �;� \.'.•':.. `\ V SLOPE OF 21 OR GREATER = 10 FEET APART U Ly W y - SLOPE BETWEEN 4:1 AND 2:1 = 15 FEET MART /V\ LAVE STAKE SLOPE OF 4:1 OR FLATTER 20 FEET MART 3. INSPECT AND REPAIR STRAW ROLLS AFTER EACH STORM Z LU LL �R EVENT AND REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN NECESSARY. 0 V /rY 1' X i' STAKE 4. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED TO M AREA - N ,U) N O THAT WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE SEDIMENT OFF -SITE AND N CAN BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. - LU (Q Q WJ�� n STRAW ROLL SAE : No SOME .. - Date: 02/15/08 - Scale: AS SHOWN 00'227, ? Design: SPIL ORE c Check: TRL SEE SHEETS CO.O AND .� Drawing Number: DsA o C1.1 FOR NOTES AND C4.1 LEGENDS ....•" of - LTI No. 07 -9854 K] 4- TO 8' DIAMETER SMOOTH If RIVER ROCK FILTER FABRIC ANCHOR STAKES/STAPLES (TYP) SEE PLANS FOR ` —� F- COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL 9'x9• NOS /981 BLADE PLASTIC FACE OF BLDG (TYP) ACTED GRAZE (BOLT DOWN) GRATE ELEVATION TRENCH AND KEY IN END _ _ _ III /�'% // (SEE NOTE i) FF ELEV 1 I _ NOS 1931 FOR 4' S0 OR #932 SEE PLANS / (1 FABRIC 8' MIN MIN FOR 6• SO HOUSING DEEP PERMANENT EROSION - /.r \ LUBE GASKET AND PIPE -SET TOP yQjE$E CONTROL FABRIC - \\ \\ \ �\ \jam C \ \xij \x�\ \\ TO GRADE AND ORIENT GRATE TO - GRAVITY FLOW 1. SWALE SHALL BE LINED WITH A PERMANENT IMPERMEABLE EROSION CONTROL FABRIC MATCH SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS. SUCH AS MIRAFl MCF 1212 OR EQUIVALENT. VMAX AND MIRAMAT CONTACT \ \�' �. '\ �� TC MIRAFl 140N FILTER , INFORMATION: JOHN TOWNS 14 ASSOCIATES \ \\ \\ \.( \��\ FABRIC OR EQUIVALENT.�� PHONE: (510) 233 -7100 - '� - OVERLAP FILTER FABRIC 8' 4' OR 6' PIPE RISER- CUT 8• 2 -3 INCH DIA '\\~. \i \ / MIN. (TYP) �W FINISH GRADE GRADED ROCK 3 ?U'0. h PRECAST 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HANDLE. STORE. PLACE AND INSTALL/ANCHOR THE DEEP �. a°Q.- CONCRETE BOX PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S 1/2' TO 3/4' CLEAN �,ok TO BE CHRI5TY RECOMMENDATIONS AND INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS \ \ \ \ \ \�� \ \� \ \� \�\�\��\ �`� \\'fib\ CRU9iED ROCK gp• ELBpW V12 DRAIN BOX 3. THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR HOME OWNER SHALL INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR - t� - 12• OR EQUIVALENT GRASS SWALE DIMENSIONS, SLOPE AND EROSION CONTROL FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE 4' PERFORATED PIPE WITH 510RM DRAIN LINE WITH THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES AND RECOMMENDATIONS GQ g' OPENINGS PLACED DOWN FAD OF LW y UNDERLAIN LAYS BY 4' THICK n BUBBLE UP ^ ROCK LINED SWALE SGIE: No SCALi pp \fir CRUSH ZONE MAX AX LAYER OF CRUSHED BOX SC AE : NO SAME NO PIPES ALLOWED) DRAIN .ROCK. 1 I NOTE- 1) REQUIRED CLEARANCE FOR BUILDING FRAMING TO ADJACENT EXPOSED GRADE: (REFER TO CBC SECTION 2306 FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DECAY AND RISTY 'FB• METER BOX W/ TERMITE PROTECTION FOR WOOD STRUCTURES.) 9•x9• NOS /981 BACK PLASTIC 'F8D• REINFORCED CONCRETE A) NEW CONSTRUCTION - PROVIDE 6• MINIMUM (SAP k SSP). - ATRIUM GRATE (BOLT DOWN) COVER MARKED "STORM 2) ALL FOUNDATION FOOTINGS LOCATED ADJACENT TO UTILITY TRENCHES SHOULD HAVE - DRAIN' OR 'SEWER' THEIR BEARING SURFACES BELOW AN IMAGINARY 1:1 (HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL) PLANE NOS /931 f01t 4' SD OR /932 ' '� 'T -CONE' STOPPER OR PROJECTED UPWARD FROM THE BOTTOM EDGE OF THE TRENCH. FOR 6' 1 HOUSING \ ;• i CLEANOUT PLUG ER (IF THE BACKFlLL WITHIN THE TRENCH IS NOT COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 90 PERCENT BANDED COUPLER COMPACTION, THE FOOTINGS SHALL BE BELOW AN IMAGINARY 2.1 PLANE.) LUKE GASKET AND PIPE -SET TOP 3) PROVIDE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.6% ON SUB -DRAIN PIPE SEE PLANS FOR - TO GRADE AND ORIENT GRATE 70 c« CLEANOUT LOCATIONS MATCH SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS. 4•PVC RISER W/ 4) PLACE PIPE IN A MINIMUM 12' DEEP BY 12• WIDE TRENCH. TRENCH SHALL BEGIN A CAP DISTENCE OF 18' TO 24' FROM THE FACE OF BUILDING, 5) SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ALL COMPACTION RECOMENDATIONS. 4' OR 6• PIPE RISER - CUT B• 4"PVC 45• BEND BELOW FINISH GRADE FLOW 6) SEE WATERPROOFING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING VAPOR - BARRIER AND BUILDING WATERPROOFING. VC CAP 7) SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR FOOTING DESIGN. PVC TEE FITTING STORM DRAIN LINE VC WYE SIZE AS EM OF LINE SPECIFIED ON PLANS 10 CRUSH ZONE AND SCALE : NO srrxE n SQUARE ATRIUM DRAIN srr .No xmE SUB -DRAIN DETAIL. V m pox. m�vmc RUSTY 'FS' METER BOX W/ •FBD' REINFORCED CONCRETE COVER MARKED 'STORM DRAIN' OR 'SEWER' T -CONE' STOPPER OR CLEANOUT PLUG W/ BANDEDBANDED COUPLER t \ VERIAP FILTER FABRIC 1' 4-PVC RISER W/ 12' MIN - CAP FLOW - ATIVE SOIL a 4'PVC 45' BEND VAPOR BARRIER \� JAGGED EDGE BROKEN 0� E FLOW - AND WATERU. 7�' TO �' CLEAN CRUSHED STONE OR 50 LB. RIP PROOFING BY ROCK RAP (6 DIA) PLACED - VC WYE SIZE AS OTHERS. �\ OVFR FILTER FABRIC (N-I -OWE T SPECIFIED ON ,\ J TC MIRAFl 14ON FILTER QQ PLANS BASEMENT TOP OF tom\ C FABRIC OR EQUIVALENT. NOTE: GLUED FITTINGS MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR GASKETED FITTINGS AT THE SLAB SSP, SAP 'T „\\, 12 OPTION OF THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR. WITH •�`::.. +” ' PERFORATED PIPE IN 36' OPENINGS PLACED DOWN n STORM DRAIN/ SEWER mu: ND scALE UNDERLAIN BY 4' THICK LAYER OF CRUSHED DRAIN \ >� \�; R° * CLEANOUT (RESIDENTIAL) ELM \\<<,'\� :✓\`"'\\�\'\�'\���;\\�'\' \: \ <�� FILTER FABRIC ANCHOR STAKES ( ) FRAME E ASSIKDR GRATE. K R E /STAPLES TIP FRAME AND GRATE, I EQUAL y`\y\���r \�w�\v�0•\v��vV \��5� G GRADE "� iauouoiii uounon iou O SOLVENT WELD TEE' FITTING TO 1 END IF PIPE PLC 5�• NOTE: - 1) PROVIDE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 1% ON SUB -DRAIN PIPE. SEE PLANS FOR CLEANOUT _ 4• 1, LENGTH AS SHOWN ON PLANS LOCATIONS AND INVERT ELEVATIONS. - 2) PLACE PIPE IN A MINIMUM 60' DEEP BY 12' WIDE TRENCH. - LTER FABRIC - OW 3) SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOUR ALL COMPACTION RECOMENDATIONS. GEOTECHNICAL (TYP) - ENGINEER SHALL INSPECT AND APPROVE THE FINAL INSTALLATION OF THE SUB -DRAIN - 7wcfi _pl,yg g::, , -.6 • . SYSTEM. TRENCH AND KEY - .. 4) SEE WATERPROOFING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING VAPOR IN END OF FILTER SECTION A -A END MEW BARRIER AND BUILDING WATERPROOFING. - NOTE:. FABRIC 12' MIN - ACA KLASSIKDRAIN 0.6% SLOPED CHANNELS IN METER LENGTHS AND 30 DEPTHS 5) SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR BASEMENT SLAB, FOOTING, AND PIER DESIGN. WHICH CONNECT TO CREATE CONTINUOUSLY SLOPING RUN.' HALF METER CHANNELS - 6) THE SUBGRADE SOIL BENEATH THE MAT SHOULD BE SLOPED AT AN INCLINATION OF - - AND NEUTRAL SLOPING CHANNELS ARE ALSO AVAILABLE. INSTALL PER 2% MINIMUM TOWARD PERIMETER SUB -DRAIN TRENCH. - - MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. �1 SUB DRAIN DETAIL SCALE : r-0 _, Q n ROCK DISSIPATER scALE : 3/8 =r-0- n .4' WIDE TRENCH DRAIN . 1 G +jMR�� -rsw V m uusxe -vsm , : Y - Ixlxai �- mervsm !L o° w O `m S 0 0 0 �? o ro ¢ `o�m u E W �p O ca o_ a o w r v 6 c� 6 C � w J V C 56'A ' W W J LU NVWU�R W V 0 LU N F— F'" 0 < W_,' tfQ �JMN Date: 02/15/08 Scale: AS SHOWN Design: SPL Check: TRL Drawing Number: C54 OF LTI No. 07 -9854 • 0 J� vet Fes" M I II I I 7 ON i i 7 TRACT N0. 1413 BK 55 PG 55 n III � � � z W C VICINITY MAP W � i NOT 70 SCALE R pp 2 SARA TOGA O -9 /F vJ � cT G O� c7 O � � � z W C VICINITY MAP W � i NOT 70 SCALE R V Y b O i IN MT) 1 i...h =POR vJ � cT G O� c7 O yM mm �' BASIS OF BEARINGS e J "a ci o m 7NE B£ARNG BETNEOI 7NO £dMID MWAMAUS ON 9Mff Y LAAE AS SHORN ON TRACT Nd 1414 MLS OF SA21 TOGA: an H) FM N BOOK 55 OF MAP$ PACE 54 SANTA CIARI COUNTY RECOIM TAKEN AS NORM '45:35' 18' HEST 2 TEMPORARY BENCHMARK K o W Z U MOWA M ON TITE CENTER EMC OF 9AtIPEY CANE OF USE W N FRONT A T BE BEGRNAG OF a)R • HO AYM BER 13m EEfVA7M = 13478 y W NOTE DIE BOUNDARY AVORMA MV 90M HEREON 1S fO7 Q NFORMA DOTAL PURPOSES OILY. THIS' SURLE'Y DOES NOT COISMUX A BOUNDARY SURVEY BY TIE U' SiNer R. O FLEVABONS�SNONN HEREON ARE BASED ON CITY OF SARATOGA DARN y UTILITY INFORMAAON 7HE LOCABGNS OF CNIDERGW W UTILITIES AS SHORN HDWaV ARE BASED ON ABOW GROUND 'STRUCTURES AAN RECORD AFORM MN. LOCATIONS OF LNO RWO UNO U7BL7XS MAY VARY fRdl LOCA 77ONIS SHORN HEREON AD IM4 BURIED U)] MSAIRUCTURES MAY EXIST. NO EXCAVAAOVS � NOTE MADE &~ THE PROGRESS OF THIS SURWY 70 LOCATE EtUPoED U78177£S/STRUCIURES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVADCN$ VAUTY COCPAAtlES AND 7iT£ CITY ENGM/EfR'S O}>res S" BE w CONTACMD AND NOIM w w o: w a z 2 S 2 2� �d N U O y - � No. 26286 m * * Sheet No. OF ' cXL AEIF� of 7 Sheet