HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-17-1992 City Council Agenda packetSARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO. 2-1 AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: June 17, 1992 CITY MG APPROVAL 7C
ORIGINATING DEPT.: Engineering
SUBJECT: Beauchamps Park CIP 977: Award of Construction
Contract
Recommended Action:
1. Declare Collishaw Construction of San Jose to be the lowest
responsible bidder on the project.
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the attached
construction contract with Collishaw Construction in the
amount of $239,415.
Discussion: Sealed bids for the Beauchamps Park Project, Capital
Project No. 977, were opened yesterday afternoon. Eight
contractors submitted bids for the work and a summary of the bids
received is attached.
Collishaw Construction of San Jose submitted the lowest bid of
$239,415 which is roughly 3.5% below the Engineer's Estimate of
$247,935. Staff has carefully checked the bids and has determined
that Collishaw Construction's bid is responsive to the Notice
Inviting Sealed Bids for the project dated May 20. It is
recommended therefore that the Council declare Collishaw
Construction to be the lowest responsible bidder on the project and
award the attached construction contract to that firm in the amount
of their bid.
Fiscal Impacts: This project is entirely funded out of the City's
Park Development Fund. A total of $243,500 is proposed to be
budgeted in FY 92 -93 in Project No. 977, Account No. 4510 for this
project. This leaves a cushion of only $4,085 to cover any
unanticipated changes which may occur during construction. Rather
than authorize staff at this time to execute change orders to the
contract up to a specified amount to cover any changes, which in
all likelihood would require the Council to appropriate additional
funds for the project, staff will first meet with the contractor to
review the entire scope of the project in an attempt to reduce
project costs by between 5 and 10 percent. If staff and the
contractor are successful at achieving this percentage of cost
reduction in the project, then sufficient funds exist in the
proposed FY 92 -93 budget to cover the project construction costs
1
and unforeseen changes. If, on the other hand, staff and the
contractor cannot achieve a sufficient reduction in the project
cost, then staff will return to you at your next meeting with other
alternatives.
Attachments:
1. Bid Summary
2. Construction Contract.
Motion Vote:
BEAUCHAMPS
11111111.111
ESTIMATED
PARK COST
ESTIMATE
E N G I N E
ESTIMATE
UNIT
E R 'S
COLLISHAW
CONST.
UNIT
LANDSCAPE
UNIT
ITEM
ITEM
NO.
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
1
Clearing and Grubbing
L.S.
N/A
$2,500.00
N/A
$5,000.00
N/A
$1,484.00
2
Rough Grading
Site
L.S.
N/A
$5,000.00
N/A
$15,884.00
N/A
$28,678.15
$9,460.00
Site Electrical
L.S.
$10,000.00
$9,300.00
A.C. Pathway
gai 4,200
$2.00
$8,400.00
$2.00
$8,400.00
$2.80
$11,760.00
6
D.G. Paving
ing 900
$1.50
$1,350.00
$1.50
$1,350.00
$2.00
$1,800.00
rigi
8
Sand Paving
Eas 3,350
$0.75
$2,512.50
$1.20
$4,020.00
$1.50
$5,025.00
Play Surface
S.F. 50
$5.00
$250.00
$28.00
$1,400.00
$31.00
$1,550.00
9
10
P.C.C. Curb Wall
Curb Cut
L.F. 200
inummi
$15.00
$750.00
$3,000.00
$1,500.00
$24.00
$150.00
$4,800.00
$300.00
$30.00
$1,349.00
$6,000.00
$2,698.00
Wood Header
L.F. 1,950
$5,362.50
$5.50
$10,725.00
$2.00
$3,900.00
Half Play Court
Tennis Court With PCC Curb
LS. L.S.
L.S.
ER
$9,000.00
$37,000.00
N/A
$9,000.00
$26,000.00
N/A
$10,437.00
$37,764.00
15
Play Structure
Swing set
L.S.
L.S.
$17,025.00
$750.00
$17,000.00
$1,200.00
$18,000.00
$1,100.00
16
Play House
L.S.
'L
$27,115.00
$26,000.00
i i i
$25,000.00
-Saw
L.S.
N/A
$1,850.00
N/A
$2,200.00
N/A
$2,400.00
is See
19
20
Spring Toys
EA.
$650.00
$1,300.00
$650.00
$1,300.00
$875.00
$1,750.00
amingimummiummui
Seat
EA.
.$600.00
400.00
$1,800.00
400.00
$400.00
$300.00
$1,200.00
$300.00
$1,050.00
$325.00
$3,150.00
$325.00
21
22
Picnic Table
Bicycle Rack
EA.
EA. 1
$1,600.00
$1,200.00
$4,800.00
$1,200.00
$1,200.00
$750.00
$3,600.00
$750.00
$1,400.00
$750.00
$4,200.00
$750.00
23
Trash Receptable
EA. 3
$250.00
$750.00
$750.00
$2,250.00
$850.00
$2,550.00
24
Metal Bollard
EA. 2
$250.00
$500.00
$200.00
$400.00
$240.00
$480.00
25
Water Fountain
EA. 1
$3,000.00
$3,000.00
$1,750.00
$1,750.00
$3,000.00
$3,000.00
26
Pathway Li. ht
EA. 2
$1,600.00
$3,200.00
$1,600.00
$3,200.00
$1,595.00
$3,190.00
Soil Prep. /Fine Grading
$17,100.00
01111111.111
$5,000.00
1331111111111111111
$5,500.00
28
Irrigation System
L.S.
111111
N/A
$50,000.00
N/A
$50,000.00
N/A
$28,000.00
29
30
24" Box Trees
Hydroseed Turf
EA.
Ex 34,500
$250.00
$0.05
$8,000.00
$1,725.00
$200.00
$0.06
$6,400.00
$2,070.00
$180.00
$0.03
$5,760.00
$1,035.00
gm
rEli
Egi
TOTAL
Hydroseed Groundcover
Hydroseed Native Grass
Ell 31,900 $0.05 $1,595.00
11111 19,000 $0.05 $950.00
$0.04
$0.06
$1,276.00
$1,140.00
$0.03
$0.03
$957.00
$570.00
90 Day Landscape Maintenance
inammacram $4,000.00 CM.. $1,200.00
MIIIIIIIN $4,000.00
BASE BID (ITEMS 1 3 3) $247,935.00 $239,415.00
;240,273.15
B.L. COHEN
LANDSCAPE
LANDSCAPE
CORP.
VIC SOTTO
INC.
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
PRICE
N/A
TOTAL
$4,890.66
PRICE
N/A
TOTAL
$6,000.00
PRICE
N/A
TOTAL
$14,200.00
PRICE
N/A
TOTAL
$11,389.00
N/A
$12 ,100.00
�N
/A
$9,000.00
N/A
$14,700.00
N/A
$11,185.00
N/A
$11,595.00
N/A
$9,150.00
N/A
$6,900.00
N/A
$2,256.00
N/A
$7,331.50
N/A
$8,360.00
N/A
$8,900.00
N/A
$3,350.00
$3.14
$13,188.00
$2.10
$8,820.00
$2.00
$8,400.00
$2.81
$11,802.00
$1.57
$1,413.00
'$1.50
$1,350.00
$1.50
$1,350.00
$1.22
$1,098.00
$2.88
$9,648.00
$2.45
$8,207.50
$3.10
$10,385.00
$8.53
$28,575.50
$19.32
$966.00
$30.00
$1,500.00
$15.00
$750.00
$38.00
$1,900.00
$22.57
$264.00
$4,514.00
$528.00
$59.00
$800.00
$11,800.00
$1,600.00
$18.00
$150.00
$3,600.00
$300.00
$42.50
$298.00
$8,500.00
$596.00
$2.20
$4,290.00
$2.30
$4,485.00
$1.90
$3,705.00
$1.70
$3,315.00
N/A
$13,487.00
N/A
$7,820.00
N/A
$9,300.00
N/A
$16,000.00
N/A
$31,395.00
N/A
$31,700.00
N/A
$31,800.00
N/A
$26, 800.00
N/A
$18,700.00
N/A
$19,800:00
N/A
$17,850.00
N/A
$18,450.00
N/A
$836.00
N/A
$900.00
N/A
$1,262.00
N/A
$1,179.00
N/A
$29,535.00
N/A
$29,585.00
N/A
$26,883.00
N/A
$28,000.00
N/A
$900.00
$2,640.00
$1,800.00
N/A
$825.00
$2,400.00
$1,650.00
N/A
$790.00
$2,434.00
$1,580.00
N/A
$849.00
$2,448.00
$1,698.00
$405.00
$1,215.00
$503.00
$1
$451.00
$463.00
$1,389.00
$261.00
$261.00
$310.00
310.00
$311.00
_$1,353.00
$311.00
$321.00
$321.00
$1,224.00
$3,672.00
$1,400.00
$4,200
$1,350.00
$4,050.00
$1,400.00
$4,200.00
$719.00
$719.00
$800.00
$800.00
$720.00
$720.00
$734.00
$734.00
$767.00
$2,301.00
$780.00
$2,340.00
$825.00
$2,475.00
$853.60
$2,560.80
$165.00
$3,000.00
$330.00
$3,000.00
$200.00
$3, 200.00
$400.00
$3,200.00
$235.00
$3,050.00
$470.00
$3,050.00
$240.00
$1,712.00
$480.00
$1,712.00
$1,760.00
$3,520.00
y $2,200.00
$4,400.00
$1,600.00
$3,200.00
$4,650.00
$9,300.00
N/A
$13,985.00
N/A
$15,050.00
N/A
$20,229.00
N/A
$9,900.00
N/A
$32,630.00
N/A
$38,060.00
N/A
$32,600.00
N/A
$37,750.00
$176.02
$0.04
$5,632.64
$1,380.00
$200.00
$0.09
$6,400.00
$3,105.00
$210.00
$0.05
$6,720.00
$1,725.00
$226.88
$0.05
$7,260.16
$1,725.00
$0.03
$957.00
$0.07
$2,233.00
$0.04
$1,276.00
$0.05
$1,595.00
$0.04
$760.00
i
$0.08
$1,520.00
$1,200.00
$0.06
$1,140.00
$0.06
$1,140.00
N/A
$3,771.00
$242,990.80
N/A
$248,854.50
N/A
$4,900.00
$248,518.00
N/A
$1,350.00
$259,958.46
B &B CONCRETE
CONST.
O'GRADY
PAVING, INC.
UNIT
UNIT
PRICE
N/A
TOTAL
$6,713.00
PRICE
N/A
TOTAL
$9,000.00
N/A
$27,847.00
N/A
$20,000.00
N/A
$7,603.00
N /A
$10,000.00
N/A
$9,493.00
N/A
$9,500.00
$1.09
$4,578.00
$1.45
$6,090.00
$1.45
$1,305.00
$2.20
$1,980.00
$2.40 1
$8,040.00
$2.10
$7,035.00
$31.25
$1,562.50
$31.00
$1,550.00
$43.50
$250.00
$8,700.00
$500.00
$38.00
$200.00
$7,600.00
$400.00
$3.00
$5,850.00
$3.00
$5,850.00
N/A
$9,748.00
N/A
$11,400.00
N/A
$24,511.00
N/A
$30,580.00
N/A
N/A
$20,508.00
$913.00
N/A
N/A
$1.8,700.00
$1,200.00
N/A
$32,284.00
N/A
$28,000.00
N/A
$2,956.00
N/A
$2,330.00
$878.00
$1,756.00
$950.00
$1,900.00
$562.00
$1,686.00
$475.00
$1,425.00
$418.00
$418.00
$325.00
$325.00
$1,585.00
$4,755.00
$1,400.00
$4,200:00
$880.00
$883.00
$880.00
$2,649.00
$750.00
$860.00
$750.00
$2,580.00
$225.00
$450.00
$250.00
$500.00
$2,290.00
$2,290.00
$4,150.00
$4,150.00
$2,183.00
$4,366.00
$2,200.00
$4,400.00
N/A
$16,422.00
N/A
$25,000.00
N/A
$37,247.00
N/A
$36,240.00
$242.00
$0.04
$7,744.00
$1,380.00
$240.00
$0.05
$7,680.00
$1,725.00
$0.03
$0.05
$957.00
$0.05
$1,595.00
$950.00
$0.05
$950.00
N/A
$5,466.00
N/A
$2,300.00
$262,527.50
$266,935.00
CITY OF SARATOGA
SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION
BEAUCHAMPS PARK
THIS CONTRACT, made this 17th day of June, 1992 by and
between the City of Saratoga, a Municipal Corporation, in Santa
Clara County, California, hereinafter called the City, and
Collishaw Construction
hereinafter called the Contractor.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS,the City has caused to be prepared in the manner pre-
scribed by law, plans, specifications and other contract docu-
ments, for the work herein described and shown and has approved
and adopted these contract documents, specifications and plans
and has caused to be published ii the manner and for the time
required by law, a Notice Inviting Sealed Bids for doing the work
in accordance with the terms of this Contract, and
WHEREAS, the Contractor in response to said Notice has submitted
to the City a sealed bid proposal accompanied by a bid guaranty
in an amount not less than ten percent (10 of the amount bid
for the construction of all of the proposed work in accordance
with the terms of this Contract, and
WHEREAS, the City, in the manner prescribed by law, has publicly
opened, examined and canvassed the bids submitted and as a result
has determined and declared the Contractor to be the lowest
responsible bidder and has duly awarded to the Contractor a
contract for all of the work and for the sum or sums named in the
bid proposal and in this Contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
ARTICLE I. WORK TO BE DONE:
That the Contractor shall provide all necessary labor, machinery,
tools, apparatus and other means of construction; shall furnish
all materials, superintendence and overhead expenses of whatever
nature necessary to construct all of the improvements for the
City of Saratoga in conformity with the plans, specifications and
other contract documents and according to such instructions as
may be given by the Saratoga City Engineer or his authorized
agent.
17
ARTICLE II. CONTRACT PRICES
Except as provided in Section IV B of the Specifications
("Changes and Extra Work the City shall pay the Contractor
according to the prices stated in the bid proposal submitted by
the Contractor, which shall include all applicable taxes, for
complete performance of the work.
The Contractor hereby agrees to accept such payment as full
compensation for all materials and appliances necessary to
complete the work; for all loss or damage arising from the work
or from action of the elements, or from any unforeseen obstruc-
tion or difficulties which may be encountered in the prosecution
of the work; incurred in and in consequence of the suspension or
discontinuance of the work; as hereby specified; for all liabili-
ties and other insurance; for all fees or royalties or other ex-
penses on account of any patent or patents; for all overhead and
other expenses incident to the work and expected profits; and for
well and faithfully performing and completing the work within the
time frame specified in•the Notice to Proceed, all according to
the contract plans and specifications, the details and instruc-
tions, and the requirements of the City.
ARTICLE III. PARTS OF THE CONTRACT:
That the complete contract document consists of the following:
1. Notice Inviting Sealed Bids
2. Bid Proposal
3. Bidder's Bond or Bid Guaranty
4. Contract for Public Works
Construction
5. Hold Harmless Clause
In case of any conflict between this Contract and any other part
of the contract, this Contract shall be binding.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused its corporate name to be
hereunto subscribed and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed
by its City Manager and its City Clerk thereunto duly authorized
and the Contractor has executed these presents the day and year
hereinabove written.
18
6. Performance Bond
7. Labor and Material Bond
8. Plans
9. specifications
10. Insurance Certificates
AWARDED BY CITY COUNCIL: CITY OF SARATOGA:
Date June 17, 1992
ATTEST: CONTRACTOR:
19
City Clerk
The foregoing Contract is By
approved as to form this
day of Title
City Attorney
19
License No.
Tax ID or SSN
Printed on recycled paper.
13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070
(408) 867 -3438
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE: June 17, 1992
Recommendation
Attachments:
1. Ordinance HP -18
2. Heritage Commission minutes, 4/8/92 and 5/13/92
3. Designation application and supporting materials
TA:cw
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Karen Anderson
Martha Clevenger
Willem Kohler
Victor Monia
Francis Stutzman
SUBJECT: Application for Designation as a Historic Landmark of a
property at 14421 Big Basin Way (HP -18)
The Heritage Preservation Commission received an application for
Designation of Historic Landmark for property at 14421 Big Basin
Way, known as The Bank. Designation of the property was initiated
by the property owners.
After careful consideration of the application and supporting
materials, the Commission determined that the property meets the
criteria for designation, per Section 13- 15.010 of the City Code.
At their April 8, 1992 meeting, the Commission voted unanimously to
recommend approval of the designation to the City Council.
The Heritage Preservation Commission recommends that the City
Council introduce the ordinance designating the property at 14421
Big Basin Way, as a Historic Landmark. A second reading is
required at the next Council meeting, and the ordinance would go
into effect thirty (30) days after the second reading.
discuss the issue of preservation of portions of the orchard
and the historic structures within the Kerwin Ranch.
Representatives of the neighborhoods adjacent to the proposed
subdivision attended the meeting. Carol Machol from Ronnie
Way and Chris Ratcliffe and Ann Stevens from Lisa Marie Court
represent the two neighborhood areas and spoke before the
Commission. They expressed their concerns with any proposal
to turn the orchard into a park and will not agree to an
assessment district for that purpose. They also objected to
re- zoning and higher density. Carol Machol said that the
orchard next to the library together with the Warner Hutton
House are sufficient. She also sees a danger in subdividing
the open space in the future.
The Heritage Commission agreed to include this item on the
4/28/92 joint meeting with the Planning Commission.
III. NEW BUSINESS
HPC MINUTES
APRIL 8,1992
A. Request for designation of "Saratoga Bank" as a Heritage
Resource
Saratoga Bank is currently on the City's Heritage resource
inventory. The Commission was very pleased that the owner
decided to proceed with an application for designation. The
Commission determined that the property is qualified for
designation in accordance with criteria a,c,e as set forth in
the City Code. Motion approved 4 -0.
The Commission directed staff to prepare a draft designation
ordinance for the Commission's review at the 5/13/92 meeting.
B. Proposed Amendment to the Zoning Regulations
This item was continued to the 5/13/92 meeting.
C. Tank House at 13764 Saratoga Vista Ave.
The subject structure is not included on the City's heritage
resource inventory. The owner of the property is interested
in preserving the water tank. However, the owner found out
that the structure is structurally unsound and requires major
structural, repair. The owner was interested in the
Commissions opinion regarding the historic value of the
structure. The owner is also interested in any available
funds for this purpose or other ways for preservation such as
relocating of the structure on another site by the City or
other agency.
In reviewing the historic value of the structure the
II. OLD BUSINESS
._..�.:�f�'.: .......:.S.y::: i.13.�iN:iiTY�ki::'.A .1
HPC MINUTES
MAY 13, 1992
would not detract from its historic integrity. However, the
Commission required that a formal application be submitted for
its review including all the elevations of the structure.
A. Saratoga Avenue Heritage Lane
The Commission reviewed the list of objectives related to
Saratoga Avenue and made the following modifications:
1. Replace "should" by "shall" in all the objective
statements.
2. Add recommendation for Heritage Lane sign on Saratoga
Avenue.
3. Change "historic orchard to "heritage orchard" in objective
#11.
4. Add an objective requiring that review of tree removal
permits on Saratoga Avenue include review of historic
preservation issues and importance of the subject trees to the
street character.
The revised draft will be presented to the Commission at the
next meeting.
B. Request for designation of "Saratoga Bank" as a Historic
Landmark Review of Draft Ordinance.
The Commission reviewed and approved a draft ordinance and
memorandum to the City Council related to designation of
Saratoga Bank as a Historic Landmark.
The ordinance will be scheduled on the next available City
Council meeting.
C. Historic Adobe Wall, 15321 Quito Road
Mr. Sinsley, the owner of the two lots adjacent to Casa Tierra
on Quito Road, requested that the location issue of the wall
be reconsidered by the Commission. He presented background
information and asked the Commission to reconsider its
previous application.
Mr. Boyle, the owner of Casa Tierra was also present at the
meeting. He submitted a letter and presented the Commission
with background information.
The Commission discussed the wall location and affirmed its
PROPERTY ADDRESS
NAME OF RESOURCE
PROPERTY OWNER
OWNER ADDRESS �r9rj 7
OWNER PHONE
OWNER SIGNATURE
r;fe F
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER
HERITAGE RESOURCE DESIGNATION
APPLICATION FORM
(No Fee)
_)rm
e '1 ,5- i .s' S�
0.-44
Date Received 3
Designation
Z
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
A. Briefly describe the present physical appearance of the site or
structure, including major vegetation features, outbuildings /walls/
fences, and any major alterations from the original condition:
B. ARCHITECTURAL STYLE
C. YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION 19/2- 9/3
D. NAME OF ARCHITECT OR BUILDER
E. APPROXIMATE PROPERTY SIZE
I. PHOTOGRAPHS
FRONTAGE 3 S 3 Iv-
DEPTH 7L f
ACREAGE
IMPORTANT
F. CONDITION OF STRUCTURE AND /OR SITE
Excellent
v' Good
Fair
Deteriorated
G. IS STRUCTURE ALTERED OR UNALTERED?
H. IS STRUCTURE ON ORIGINAL SITE OR HAS IT BEEN MOVED?
Please attach photcgraphs showing all four elevations of the
structure or site. Indicate date taken.
Prior to submitting an application for heritage resource designation,
the following should be read carefully:
I, the applicant, understand that by applying for
designation of my property as a heritage resource, that such
property will be subject to the provisions of Chapter 13 of
the Saratoga City Code. I also agree that these provisions
will he complied with as well as any conditions upon which
the application is granted.
Signature
Date
Address /e-y,
Phone (q3 7— .5-7,573
3
HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY #4
IDENTIFICATION
1. Common name: The Bank
2. Historic name: Saratoga Bank Building
3. Street or rural address: 14421 Big Basin Way
City: Saratoga Zip: 95070 County: Santa Clara
4. Parcel number: 503 -24 -005
5. Present Owner: L. L. Sullivan et al Address: 14421 Big Basin Way
City: Saratoga Zip: 95070
Ownership is: Public: Private: X
6. Present Use: Commercial Original Use: Commercial
DESCRIPTION
7a. Architectural style: Classic Revival
7b. Briefly describe the present physical appearance of the site or
structure and describe any major alterations from its original
condition:
This well preserved building typifies the Classic Revival style of
architecture. The one and a half story brick building has two different
brick patterns. The intricate brick detailing of the front facade creates
its own soffits, columns, and ledges above the granite base. The windows
are inset from the brick. There are dentils along the first soffit above
the windows and the entry door, which appear to be original. The entry
walk is inset with small square hexagon ceramic tiles which spell out the
word, BANK. The entry door area is oak paneled and the roof cornice is
boxed. The frieze contains dentils and an egg- and -dart embossed molding
and crown molds. The two side windows are double hung and protected by
heavy iron bars.
8. Construction date:
Estimated: 1913
Factual:
9. Architect: Unknown
(photograph here) 10. Builder: John Rodoni
11. Approx. prop. size
Frontage: 25.13'
Depth: 76'
approx. acreage:
12. Date(s) of enclosed
photograph(s): 1988
13. Condition: Excellent: X Good: Fair: Deteriorated:
No longer in existence:
14. Alterations:
15. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary)
Open land: Scattered buildings: Densely built -up: X
Residential: Industrial: Commercial: X Other:
16. Threats to site: None known: X Private development: Zoning:
Vandalism: Public Works project: Other:
17. Is the structure: On its original site? X Moved? Unknown?
18. Related features:
SIGNIFICANCE
19. Briefly state historical and /or architectural importance (include dates,
events, and persons associated with the site).
This classic brick building was the first bank in Saratoga and an early
example of solid brick wall construction in the area. It was built by a
group of local men who formed a company, sold stock and managed the bank.
It was bought in 1917 by the Garden City Bank of San Jose. Louis G. Heid
was one of the early managers, traveling from the Willow Glen area of San
Jose by Peninsular Railroad each day. Garden City Bank sold the building
to American Trust, who then closed this branch. The Bank of America
occupied the building until 1958, when they moved into a new building at
another location on Big Basin Way. It was then occupied by real esta}
firms, including Duane Muth, and became a cocktail lounge in the mi
1970's. The original vault remains and is part of the interior decor. The
lounge is now known as The Bank Bar.
20. Main theme of the historic resource:
(If more than one is checked, number
in order of importance.)
Architecture: 2 Arts /Leisure:
Economic /Industrial: 1
Exploration /Settlement:
Government: Military:
Religion: Social /Ed.:
21. Sources (List books, documents,
surveys, personal interviews and
their dates).
Santa Clara County Heritage Resource
Inventory, 1975, 1979; Butler, Valley
of Santa Clara, 1975.
22. Date form prepared: 4/88
By (name): SHPC
Organization: City of Saratoga
Address: 13777 Fruitvale Ave.
City: Saratoga Zip: 95070
Phone: 867 -3438
Locational sketch map (draw and label site and
surrounding streets, roads, and prominent .imarks):
'ORTH
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO. 2.4q1 AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: June 17, 1992 CITY MGR. APPROVAL.
ORIGINATING DEPT: Engineering
1
SUBJECT: Bonnet Way Soundwall CIP 9113:
Approval of Design Engineering Agreement
Recommended Action:
Approve attached proposal for design engineering services and
authorize staff to execute the proposal.
Discussion:
Attached is a proposal for design engineering services for the
Bonnet Way soundwall dated June 3 from Mesiti Miller Engineering
Company of Santa Cruz. I have elected to negotiate an agreement
with this firm because of their knowledge of the project due to
previous schematic design work which they have performed and
because of their demonstrated ability to produce quality
construction documents in a timely manner.
The proposal covers all services which I envision will be necessary
to advertise the project for bids. Included in the scope of
services is attendance at neighborhood working meetings to review
design alternatives and present information on performance
characteristics of various types of walls which could be built.
The proposed fee for the outlined scope of services is a not to
exceed amount of $23,000 which represents less than 8% of the total
estimated project cost of $288,000. Actual compensation for
services however will be dependent on the actual amount of hours
billed to the project and is based on the firm's billing rates
which are attached to the proposal. In my view, the proposed not
to exceed fee is reasonable and fair for a project of this
magnitude.
If the Council approves the proposal, Mesiti Miller can begin their
work within one week of authorization to proceed. As the first
order of business involves meeting with the neighborhood to review
various wall schemes, I am proposing that this occur during the
week of July 6 so that if a follow -up neighborhood meeting is
necessary, it can be scheduled for later in July. This should
allow for staff to prepare a recommendation on the soundwall design
for Council's consideration at your first meeting in August.
Assuming Council approves a design then, 1 would anticipate that
construction drawings could be completed by the end of August; that
advertising and award of a construction contract could occur by the
beginning of October; and that construction of the wall could be
complete by the end of the year. Although construction of the
Route 85 segment east of Saratoga Avenue will have started by then,
the use of the realigned Southern Pacific railroad tracks is not
expected to begin until sometime next February and this is the
milestone by when the wall should be in place.
Fiscal Impacts:
The proposed FY 92 -93 budget contains $288,000 in Capital Project
No. 9113. However, $128,770 is to be reimbursed by the Traffic
Authority for the soundwall per the Cooperative Agreement entered
into between the City and the Traffic Authority in February.
,Attachments:
1. Proposal from Mesiti Miller Engineering Company dated June 3.
Motion Vote:
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO. 2/fl- AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: June 17, 1992
ORIGINATING DEPT: Engineering
SUBJECT: SD 90 -011 (14810 Sobey Road): Houston
Final Map Approval for Two Lots
CITY MGR. APPROVAL
Recommended action:
1. Adopt Resolution No. SD 90 -011 granting Final Map Approval of
SD 90 -011.
2. Authorize the Mayor to execute the Contract for the
Improvement of SD 90 -011.
Report Summary:
Attached is Resolution No. SD 90 -011 which, if adopted, will grant
Final Map Approval for two lots located at 14810 Sobey Road. I
have examined the final map submitted to me in accordance with the
provisions of Section 14.40.020 of the Municipal Code and have
determined that:
1. The final map substantially complies with the approved
tentative map.
2. All conditions of the tentative map as contained in
Planning Commission Resolution No. SD 90 -011 have been
completed or are covered by the standard Improvement
Agreement and secured by appropriate and sufficient
securities.
3. The Subdivision Map Act, the City's Subdivision Ordinance
and all other applicable provisions of law have been
complied with.
4. The final map is technically correct.
Consequently, I have execute the City Engineer's Certificate on the
final map and have filed the final map with the City Clerk pursuant
to Section 14- 40.040 of the Municipal Code for action by the City
Council.
1
Fiscal Impacts:
None.
Attachments:
1. Planning Commission Resolution No SD 90 -011, dated
August 14, 1991.
2. Resolution No. SD 90 -011.
3. Contract for the Improvement of SD 90 -011.
Motion Vote:
2
Done.
Done.
RESOLUTION NO. SD -90 -011.1
RESOLUTION APPROVING TENTATIVE MAP OF
HOUSTON; 14810 Sobel Road
WHEREAS, application has been made to the Advisory Agency
under the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California and under
the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Saratoga, for tentative
map approval of two (2) lots, all as more particularly set forth
in File No. SD -90 -011 of this City; and
WHEREAS, this Advisory Agency hereby finds that the proposed
subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and
improvement, is consistent with the Saratoga General Plan and with
all specific plans relating thereto, and the proposed subdivision
and land use is compatible with the objectives, policies and
general land use and programs specified in such General Plan,
reference to the Staff Report dated July 10, 1991 being hereby made
for further particulars; and
WHEREAS, this body has heretofore received and considered the
Categorical Exemption prepared for this project in accord with the
currently applicable provisions of CEQA, and
WHEREAS, none of the conditions set forth in Subsections (a)
through (g) of Government Code Section 66474 exist with respect to
said subdivision, and tentative approval should be granted in
accord with conditions as hereinafter set forth.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a duly noticed
public hearing at which time all interested parties were given a
full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the tentative map for the
hereinafter described subdivision, which map is dated May, 1991 and
is marked Exhibit "A" in the hereinabove referred file, be and the
same is hereby conditionally approved. The conditions of said
approval are as follows:
1. Prior to submittal of the Final Map to the City Engineer for
examination, the owner (applicant) shall cause the property
to be surveyed by a Licensed Land Surveyor or an authorized
Civil Engineer. The submitted map shall show the existence
of a monument at all external property corner locations,
either found or set. The submitted map shall also show
monuments set at each new corner location, angle point, or as
directed by the City Engineer, all in conformity with the
Subdivision Map Act and the Professional Land Surveyors Act.
2. Interior monuments shall be set at each lot corner either
prior to recordation of the Final Map or some later date to
be specified on the Final Map. If the owner (applicant)
chooses to defer the setting of interior monuments to a
specified later date, then sufficient security as determined
Fees paid.
Fees paid.
File No. 8D -90- 011.1; 14810 &obey Road
by the City Engineer shall be furnished to the City Engineer
prior to Final Map approval.
3. The owner (applicant) shall pay an Improvement Plan Checking
fee, as determined by the City Engineer at the time Improve-
ment Plans are submitted to the City Engineer for checking.
4. The owner (applicant) shall pay a Map Checking Fee, as
determined by the City Engineer, at the time of submittal of
the Final Map for examination. Maps submitted for examination
shall be not less than three in number and shall be accom-
panied by the following items:
a. One copy of map checking calculations.
b. Preliminary Title Report dated within previous 90 days.
c. One 'copy of each map referenced thereon.
d. One copy of each document /deed referenced thereon.
e. One copy of any other map, document, deed, easement or
other resource that will facilitate the examination
process.
Fees paid. 5. The owner (applicant) shall pay a Park and Recreation Fee, as
determined by the City Code and City Council resolution(s)
prior to Final Map approval.
Done. 6. The owner (applicant) shall furnish a written indemnity
agreement and proof of insurance coverages, in accordance with
Section 14- 05.055 of the Municipal Code, prior to Final Map
approval.
Done. 7. Engineered improvement plans, in accordance with the design
and improvement requirements of Chapter 14 of the Municipal
Code, shall be approved by the City Engineer and /or the
appropriate officials from other public agencies, including
public and private utility providers, prior to Final Map
approval.
Done.
Done.
8. The owner (applicant) shall provide Irrevocable Offers of
Dedication for all required easements and /or rights of way on
the Final Map, in substantial compliance with the approved
tentative map, prior to Final Map approval.
9. The owner (applicant) shall submit a Final Map in substantial
compliance with the approved Tentative Map, along with the
additional documents required in Section 14- 40.020 of the
Municipal Code, to the City Engineer for his review and
approval. The Final Map shall contain all of the information
required in certain by Section 14- 40.030 of the Municipal Code
and any additional information that may be required by the
City Engineer.
Done. 10. The owner (applicant) shall enter into an Improvement
Done.
Done.
N /A.
Done.
Done.
Done.
On plans.
tested when installed.
On plans.
District Standards.
Pile No. 8D -90 -011; 14810 Sobel Road
Agreement with the City in accordance with Section 14- 60.010
of the Municipal Code prior to Final Map approval.
11. The owner (applicant) shall furnish Improvement Securities in
accordance with Section 14- 60.020 of the Municipal Code in the
manner and amounts determined by the City Engineer prior to
Final Map approval.
12. The owner (applicant) shall file with the Santa Clara County
Recorder the requisite statement indicating that there are no
liens against the property or any part thereof for any unpaid
taxes or special assessments prior to Final Map approval. A
copy of the statement shall be provided to the City Engineer.
13. All public and private improvements shall be completed and
accepted by the City Engineer, Planning Director, and /or the
appropriate officials from other public agencies, including
public and private utility providers, prior to the acceptance
of any Design Review applications for any of the lots proposed
to be created.
14. Prior to Final Map approval, the owner (applicant) shall
furnish the City Engineer with satisfactory written commit-
ments from all public and private utility providers serving
the subdivision guaranteeing the completion of all required
utility improvements.
15. The owner (applicant) shall secure all necessary permits from
the City and any other public agencies, including public and
private utility providers, prior to the start of any construc-
tion of the subdivision improvements.
16. The owner (applicant) shall seal the existing well to the
Santa Clara Valley Water District specifications.
Done. 17. The owner (applicant) shall locate and abandon the existing
septic tank to the City of Saratoga Building Department
specifications.
On plans. 18. Access road shall be marked "Fire Lane No Parking" through-
out.
19. The owner (applicant) shall provide an approved fire hydrant
adjacent to parcel B as required by the Central Fire District.
Hydrant to be flow 20. The fire hydrant shall provide not less than 1000 gpm at 20
psi flowing.
21. Turnaround at the end of the access road shall conform to Fire
With Design Review. 22. Any future redevelopment of parcel B shall comply with current
Acknowledged.
Done.
On plans.
File No. 8D- 90- 011.1; 14810 Sobel' Road
City Code regulations and application review procedures.
Development of parcel A shall comply with the following
requirements:
a. Any proposed development shall be subject to design
review approval by the Planning Commission. Such
approval shall not be granted unless it can be determined
that the proposal is compatible in terms of size, scale
and design with the existing residences in the area.
b. The design review application shall include a landscape
plan indicating native and drought tolerant vegetation
incorporating the City's xeriscape standards.
c. If a two -story home is proposed, the upper floor shall
be set back sufficiently to avoid obstructing any
neighbor's views of the western hillsides, particularly
with regard to the immediately adjacent Fuqua residence.
d. As well as conforming with current property line setback
requirements, no structure or paved area shall be
permitted near the Valley Oak, identified as tree #4 in
the Arborist Report, or the Willow grove. The required
setbacks from the Valley Oak and the Willow grove shall
be determined by the City Arborist, in consultation with
the Planning Director and the City Engineer, prior to
final map approval. A map indicating these setbacks
shall be prepared by the City Arborist and incorporated
into the file as Exhibit "C
23. All tree preservation measures of the Arborist Report dated
January 15, 1991, shall apply. This includes, but is not
limited to, the placement of construction period fencing
around the affected trees identified on Exhibit "B This
fencing shall be installed and inspected by Planning staff
prior to any work commencing.
24. Prior to final map approval, the City Arborist shall prepare
a comprehensive report identifying the Willow grove habitat
area to be preserved. This report shall include appropriate
setbacks from the Willow grove (as discussed in condition
22.d.), the extent of work which can be permitted within the
Willow grove, and the appropriate methods to clear underbrush
within this grove without damaging the riparian habitat or
significant vegetation.
25. Prior to final map approval, the private driveway access
easement serving parcels A and B shall be relocated to utilize
the existing driveway serving the site. The vegetation within
the south property line drainage swale shall be preserved to
provide a landscape screen between parcel A and the adjacent
lots to the south.
Done.
Acknowledged.
Bile No. 8D- 90- 011.1; 14810 Sobey Road
26. Prior to final map approval, the owner (applicant) shall
remove any inoperable vehicles, trailers or materials from
parcel B per Section 15- 12.160 of the City Code. The owner
(applicant) shall also either remove the accessory structure
within the rear yard setback of parcel B, or bring it into
conformance with current zoning and building code require-
ments.
27. Noncompliance with any of the conditions of this permit shall
constitute a violation of the permit. Because it is impos-
sible to estimate damages the City could incur due to the
violation, liquidated damages of $250.00 shall be payable to
this City per each day of the violation.
Section 1. Applicant shall sign the agreement to these
conditions within 30 days of the passage of this resolution or said
resolution shall be void.
Section 2. Conditions must be completed within 24 months or
approval will expire.
Section 3. All applicable requirements of the State, County,
City and other Governmental entities must be met.
Section 4. Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of
Article 15 -90 of the Saratoga City Code, this Resolution shall
become effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commis-
sion, State of California, this day of 14th day of August, 1991,
by the following vote:
AYES: BOGOSIAN, CALDWELL, FAVERO, FORBES, MORAN
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: DURKET, TUCKER
The foregoing conditions are hereby accepted:
Signature of applicant Date
an, Plann ng Commiss on
Se ary,/P1anning Commission
CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SD 90 -011
AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
19, by and between the CITY OF SARATOGA, a Municipal corporation of the
Stare of California, hereinafter called "City and Jerry Houston
subdivider and Owner, hereinaf
collectively called Subdivider:
W I T N E S S E T R:
WHEREAS, Subdivider is engaged in subdividing that certain tract of
land known and designated as 14810 Sober Road
situated in the City of Saratoga, County of Sant
Clara, State of California; and
WHEREAS, a final map of SMNsr SD 90 -011 has been filed with the Crty
Clerk of the City of Saratoga for presentation to the Council for its approve
which map is hereby referred to and by said reference incorporated herein; an
WHEREAS, Owner and Subdivider has requested approval of said final map
prior to the completion of improvements of all streets, highways or public
ways and sewer facilities which are a part of or appurtenant to the abovemen-
tioned subdivision, including, but without limiting the foregoing, the neces-
sary paving, catch basins, pipes, culverts, storm drains, sanitary sewers
where required, street trees and street signs where required, and including a
water system and fire hydrants acceptable to the San Jose Water Works and the
City of Saratoga, all in accordance with and as required by the plane and spel
fixations for all of said improvements in or appurtenant to said subdivision,
which plane and specifications were prepared by Jennings -Mc Dermott-
Heiss, Inc. Civil Engineer, approved by the City Engineer and now on fig
in the offices of the Clerk of said City and /or the City.Engineer's Office of
said City, and
WHEREAS, the City Council of said City did .on the day of
19 adopt a Resolution approving said Final Map
reijeut.Lug certain dedications therein offered which rejection did not and
does not, however, revoke the offers of dedication therein contained and re-
quiring as a condition precedent to the future acceptance of said offers of
-2-
dedication that the Subdivider improve the streets and easements thereon
shown in accord with the standards of the City of Saratoga and in
accord with the 'improvement plans and specifications on file as
herein _referred to, "and requiring as a condition precedent to the
release of said final map for recordation that the subdivider agree
in writing to so improve said streets and easements in accord with
this agreement,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above and in consideration of
the City accepting all of said dedications after the hereinafter agreed to
covenants on the part of the Owner and Subdivider have been complied with an
in accord with Government Cods Section 66462(a) of the State of California,
it is hereby agreed as follows:
1. Subdivider at his cost and expense shall construct all of the im-
provements and do all of the work hereinafter mentioned, all in accordance
with and to the extent and as provided in the above mentioned plans and spec.
fications on file in the office of said City, for the construction of said
improvements, in, for, or appurtenant to said subdivision, and all in com-
pliance with Article 14 -30 of the City Code as amended and the laws of
the State of California, and shall complete the same within one year
from the date hereof and shall maintain the same for a period of at least
one year after the satisfactory completion of the same.
2. Subdivider shall, before the release of said final map by City and
as condition precedent to recordation thereof, furnish to the City and.file a
the City Clerk a good and sufficient surety bond or bonds, money or negotiabl
bonds, in form to be approved by the City Attorney, securing the faithful
performance by Subdivider of all work and the construction of all improvement
hoyain nti^_ntd withim time
faithful performance by Subdivider of the maintenance ,of said improvements
for a period of at least one year after completion of the same, and for such
additional period of time as may be necessary in order that Subdivider may
cure and correct all deficiencies of construction to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer of the City of Saratoga (in all events at least 3,500
-3-
of said bond to be in cash, with the right of
City to use the same in its discretion for emergency maintenance and re-
pairs in addition to any other rights of use) the total amount of said bond
to be in the sum of 35,000 (Thirty- five thousand dollars)
and also a good and sufficient surety bond in form to be approved by the City
Attorney securing the payment by subdivider of all bills for labor and ma-
terials incurred in the construction of any and all of said improvements, and
the doing of all other work herein agreed to be done by the said Subdivider,
the amount of said bond to be Thirty -five thousand
Dollars 35,000
3. Subdivider does hereby expressly agree to indemnify and hold harmless
the City and in their capacity as such, its councilmen, officers, boards,
commissions and its employees, from any and all loss or damage, and from any
and all liability for any and all loss or damage, and from any and all suits,
actions, damages, or claims filed or brought by any and all person or persons
because of or resulting from the doing by Subdivider or any and all things re-
quired of Subdivider by this contract, or because of or arising or resulting
from the failure or omission by Subdivider to do any and all things necessary
to and required by this contract or by law, or arising or resulting from the
negligent doing by Subdivider, his agents, employees or subcontractors'of any
and all things required to be done by.this contract, or arising or resulting
from any dangerous or defective condition arising or resulting from any of the
above said acts or omissions of subdivider, his agents, subcontractors, or
employees. Subdivider having heretofore certified, by the certificate upon
the abovementioned subdivision map, that he can convey clear title to the land
within said subdivision, and City having relied upon said certificate and the
representation contained therein, the foregoing provisions of this paragraph
are specifically made to apply to any destruction or damage to or removal of
utilities, water lines or pipe lines of any kinds, and any other improvement,
whether said destruaciwil, uamage or removal is required wl ca.:sac: r
or specifications or by direction of an officer, agent or employee of the City
4. Subdivider. !hall, before the release of said final map by the City, a
as a condition precedent to the recordation thereof, furnish to the City and
file with the City Clerk certificates or policies of public liability and
-4-
property damage insurance in for satisfactory to the City Attorney, and Sub-
divider shall at all times during the entire term of this agreement maintain
the same in full force and effect, which policies shall insure the City of
Saratoga, its Councilmen, officers, boards, commissions and employees against
loss or liability for bodily injury and property damages arising or resulting
from subdivider's operations and activities in construction of any and al
improvements mentioned in this agreement and the doing of any and all work
mentioned in this agreement, within or outside the abovementioned subdivision
and /or arising or resulting from the doing or failure of subdivider to do all
things required to be done pursuant to this agreement. Said policies of in-
p.
surance shall cover bodily injury and property damage on both an accident and
occurrence basis, with completed operations coverage for one (1) year after
completion and acceptance of improvements, and shall be in amounts of not les!
than ONE MILLION DOLLARS($1,000,000.00) for each person, ONE MILLION DOLLARS
$1,000,000.00) for each accident or occurrence and property damage coverage
of ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000.00) for each accident or
occurrence. Said policies of insurance shall in addition contain the followir
endorsement: "Other insurance the coverage afforded by this insurance shall
be primary coverage to the full limits of liability stated in the declarations
If the assured has other insurance against the loss covered by this policy,
that other insurance shall be excess insurance only, after the entire face
value of this policy shall have been exhausted by payment."
S. Ia consideration of City allowing Subdivider to connect said sub-
division to certain existing or proposed out -of -tract storm sewer lines, and
in consideration of City relieving Subdivider of any obligation which City
might legally impose on Subdivider to acquire any right way for, and /or
to construct, any out of tract storm sewer drainage pipe lines and appurtenant
which might reasonably be necessary to drain said subdivision and carry storm
waters from said subdivision to natural drains, Subdivider shall, before the
release of said final map by City and as a condition precedent to the recorda-
tion thereof, pay the City the sum of Zero
dollars 0
-5-
6. In consideration of City agreeing to accept, in accord with this
agreement, the in -tract storm drain lines and facilities constructed or to be
constructed by Subdivider within or outside of said subdivision in accord
with the plans and specifications now on file with the City offices, includic
the streets and other easements in or beneath which said facilities lie, Sub-
divider shall, before the release of said final map by City and as a conditio
precedent to the recordation thereof, pay the City the sum of Zero
Dollars 0
7. Subdivider shall, before the release of said final map by the City
and as a condition precedent to the recordation thereof, pay to the City the
sum of Three thousand four hundred -fort
y -SiX D011ara 3.446.50
to be applied by City to the payment of expenses to be incurred by City for
engineering and inspection services to be performed by the City in connection
with said subdivision.
8. Upon Subdivider completing in accord with this agreement all of the
improvements to be made and done by said Subdivider as herainabove set forth
and as shown on the plans and specifications on file as herainabove referred
to, and upon Subdivider having properly maintained the same for a period of
at least one year after the completion of said
improvements as hereinabove
specified, and upon the Subdivider complying
with all coveneAts and conditions
on his or its part to be done and performed in• accord with the within agree-
ment, then and in that event, City agrees to rescind its rejection of the
offers of dedication of streets and storm drain easements contained on the
aforesaid final map, and at that time accept said offers of dedication.
9. Should the Subdivider and Owner herainabove referred to not be the
same person, firm or corporation, then this agreement shall only be effective
upon both the subdivider and the Owner separately executing the same, and
.4 herever the term Subdivider is ',paws. the same shall include Owner and whP w4 r
the term Owner is used, the same shall include Subdivider.
10. This agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, personal represen-
tatives and assigns of Subdivider and Owner, and time is of the essence hereof,
-6-
save and except that the City Council of the City of Saratoga may, but need
not, extend any time or times for the doing or performing of any acts as
required under the terms of this agreement by resolution, if in the opinion
of the City Council any such delay is without fault on the part of the Sub-
divider and Owner.
Execution of the within agreement by the Owner or Subdivider shall
constitute an irrevocable authorization to City to insert the date of passage
of the Council resolution approving the final map, and to insert the date of
this agreement as of the date of such resolution.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hand the day and
year first above written.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
CITY OF SARATOGA, a Municipal Corporatic
By:
Mayor
•rent rom Subdivider)
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO. 2493 AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: June 17, 1992 CITY MGR. APPROVAL
ORIGINATING DEPT. Engineering
SUBJECT: Establishment of "No Parking" zone on Saratoga Avenue
between Kosich Drive and Lawrence Expressway
Recommended Action:
Adopt MV Resolution establishing the "No Parking" zone.
Discussion:
Attached is a resolution which, if adopted, would establish a
"No Parking" zone along the westerly side of Saratoga Avenue
between Kosich Drive and Lawrence Expressway. Several concerns
have recently been expressed by residents of the Saratoga Park
Woods Homeowners Association (see attached letter) about a sight
distance problem created when trucks park along Saratoga Avenue
north of Kosich Drive. The parked trucks block the view of
southbound vehicles on Saratoga Avenue from motorists attempting to
turn onto Saratoga Avenue from Kosich Drive. Engineering staff has
investigated the reported problem and has determined that it does
exist and that the request for a "No Parking" zone is valid and
warranted. Further, staff has identified a safety problem that
occurs when trucks are parked in what is actually the merge lane
from Lawrence Expressway onto Saratoga Avenue. No residents will
be affected by the establishment of the "No Parking" zone. It
appears that only truckers who use the area as a temporary rest
stop would be affected.
Fiscal Impacts:
Approximately $250 to install the necessary curb markings and
signage.
Attachments:
1. MV Resolution.
2. Vicinity map showing proposed "No Parking" zone.
3. Letter from Saratoga Park Woods HOA dated May 5.
SCALE:
/".r/00'
6
Larry Perlan
City of Saratoga
Engineering Department
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 95070
Dear Mr. Perlan,
cc: Marcia Fariss
Erman Dorsey
Saratoga Park Woods Homeowners Association
P.O. Box 2301 Saratoga, CA 95070
May 5, 1992
We would like to bring a safety issue to your attention. A number of our residents have expressed
concem regarding vehicle parking on the south side of Saratoga Avenue (between Kinko's Copy
Center and Kosich Drive) blocking the view of oncoming traffic for drivers making a left tum onto
Saratoga Avenue from Kosich Drive.
This area is particularly hazardous due to:
heavy traffic merging from Lawrence Expressway onto Saratoga Ave.
immediate reduction of lanes from three to two
shopping center entrance
What is the possibility of having this area designated a NO PARKING zone? The Saratoga Park
Woods Homeowners Association would appreciate your support in this matter of public safety.
Sincerely yours,
Susan Millhollan
Secretary
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO.
MEETING DATE: June 17, 1992
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Manager
SUBJECT: CAL -ID Contract Fourth Amendment
FY 92 -93
Attachments:
Fourth amendment to agreement
Motion and Vote:
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM
CITY MGR. APPROVAL
Recommended Motion:
Authorize Mayor and City Attorney to execute the Amendment on
behalf of the City
Report Summary:
This agreement extends the provision of CAL -ID services on a joint
basis among all fifteen cities and the County, first entered into
in April of 1988. The system provides an automated fingerprint
identification system for tie -in to the State and to link all
communities in the County together. Cost is shared on a per capita
basis and Saratoga has a 3.9% share of the projected total cost of
$397,697 for FY 92 -93. The program is administered by the San Jose
Police Department.
Fiscal Impacts:
Cost for FY 92 -93 is $15,435 for Saratoga. This amount is included
in the budget for law enforcement services for 92-93.