The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03-03-2010 City Council packet AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING SARATOGA CITYCOUNCIL MARCH 3, 2010 SPECIAL MEETING –5:15P.M. ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE ROOM, 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE. CALL MEETING TO ORDER–5:15P.M. REPORT OF CITY CLERK ON POSTING OF AGENDA (Pursuant to Gov’t. Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properlyposted on February 26, 2010) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COMMISSIONS & PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Any member of the public will be allowed to address the City Council for up to three (3) minutes on matters not on this agenda. The law generally prohibits the council from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Council may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Council Direction to Staff. COMMUNICATIONS None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS -COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF Directionto Staff regarding actions on current Oral Communications. COMMISSION INTERVIEWS FOR PLANNING, HERITAGE PRESERVATION AND TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSIONS The following people have been scheduled for interviews: TIMECANDIDATECOMMISSION 5:15Yan ZhaoPlanning 5:20Joyce HlavaPlanning 5:25Tina MambaPlanning 5:32David ElgartPlanning 5:38Paula CappelloHeritage Preservation 5:46Peter MaraHeritage Preservation 5:50Steve KellondHeritage Preservation 5:53Norm KoepernikHeritage Preservation 5:58Warren HeidHeritage Preservation 6:03Douglas BoalesTraffic Safety 6:10Felice CurcelliTraffic Safety 6:15Ernest BrookfieldTraffic Safety 6:20Corinne VitaTraffic Safety 6:25Kenneth BiesterTraffic Safety CALL JOINT MEETING TO ORDER–6:30P.M. 1.Joint Meeting with Parks and Recreation Commission Recommended Action: Informational only. ADJOURNMENT In accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, copies of the staff reports and other materials provided to the City Councilby City staff in connection with this agenda are available at the office of the Community Development Department Director at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Note that copies of materials distributed to the City Council concurrently with the posting of the agenda are also available on the City Website at www.saratoga.ca.us.Any materials distributed by staff after the posting of the agenda are made available for public review at the office of the City Clerkat the time they are distributed to the City Council. In Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at 408/868-1269. Notification 24 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA title II] Certificate of Posting of Agenda: I,Ann Sullivan, City Clerk for theCity of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the City Council forthe City of Saratoga was posted on February 26, 2010, City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga, CA 95070 and was available for public review at that location. The agenda is also available on the City’s website at www.saratoga.ca.us th Signed this26day of February 2010at Saratoga, California. Ann Sullivan, CMC City Clerk èÛÚÐ×ÍÖùÍÎÈ×ÎÈÉ ûÕ×ÎØÛ ©çÎÓÈÃÓÎùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ¨ìÊ×É×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ùÓÈÃùÍÇÎÙÓÐï××ÈÓÎÕïÓÎÇÈ×É¦ö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ïÓÎÇÈ×É ùÓÈÃùÍÇÎÙÓÐï××ÈÓÎÕïÓÎÇÈ×É¦ïÛÊÙÔ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ïÓÎÇÈ×É èÊ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÊªÉê×ÌÍÊÈÖÍÊÈÔ×ïÍÎÈÔ÷ÎØ×ØòÛÎÇÛÊÃ èÊ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÊÉê×ÌÍÊÈÖÍÊÈÔ×ïÍÎÈÔ÷ÎØ×ØòÛÎÇÛÊÃ ê×ÆÓ×ÅÍÖûÙÙÍÇÎÈÉìÛÃÛÚÐ×ùÔ×ÙÑê×ÕÓÉÈ×ÊÉ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ìÊÍÉÌ×ÙÈêÍÛØï×ØÓÛÎîÍ¦îÍÈÓÙ×ÍÖùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ îÍÈÓÙ×ÍÖùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ òÍÓÎÈçÉ×ûÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÉÅÓÈÔéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÖÍÊ òÍ×ªÉèÊÛÓÐ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ òÍÓÎÈçÉ×ûÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÖÍÊòÍ×ªÉèÊÛÓÐ ðÛÎØÉÙÛÌÓÎÕðÓÕÔÈÓÎÕûÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈððûê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎÉ ÓÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÎÕÊ×Î×ÅÛÐÍÖÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÖÍÊöã éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎØ×ÉÙÊÓÚÓÎÕÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÛÎØØÓÊ×ÙÈÓÎÕ ÌÊ×ÌÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×÷ÎÕÓÎ××ÊªÉê×ÌÍÊÈ öã ùíïïçîóèãø÷æ÷ðíìï÷îèúðíùñõêûîè ùøúõûîøùíïïçîóèãõêûîèöçîøóîõ ûììðóùûèóíîé éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ûÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ õÊÛÎÈê×ËÇ×ÉÈåÍÊÑÉÔ××ÈûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ ùÍÇÎÈÃùøúõûØÏÓÎÓÉÈÊÛÈÓÍÎê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÉ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ õÍÍÕÐ×öÓÚ×ÊÖÍÊùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×Éê×ËÇ×ÉÈÖÍÊóÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈûéÈÛÖÖÊ×ÌÍÊÈÍÎõÍÍÕÐ×öÓÚ×ÊÖÍÊ ùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉêöóÖÊÍÏö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈúõÍÍÕÐ×öÓÚ×ÊÖÍÊùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×Éêöó ê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎûÇÈÔÍÊÓÂÓÎÕûúûõÈÍÛÙÙ×ÌÈéÈÛÈ×÷Î×ÊÕÃìÊÍÕÊÛÏ öÇÎØÉÍÎú×ÔÛÐÖÍÖÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖéÛÊÛÈÍÕÛ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈûê×ÉÍÐÇÈÓÍÎÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÂÓÎÕûúûõÈÍÛÙÙ×ÌÈ é÷ìÖÇÎØÉÍÎÚ×ÔÛÐÖÍÖÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖéÛÊÛÈÍÕÛ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈúø×Ù×ÏÚ×Ê ÉÈÛÖÖÊ×ÌÍÊÈÍÎÈÔ× ûúûõÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ×Î×ÊÕÃ×ÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÙÃÛÇØÓÈÛÎØÊ×ÈÊÍÖÓÈ ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÐ×ÈÈ×ÊÍÖÙÍÏÏÓÈÏ×ÎÈ ìÊÍÙ×ÉÉÖÍÊûÐÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ÷Æ×ÎÈÉöÇÎØ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈûùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ÷Æ×ÎÈÉöÇÎØØÓÉÈÊÓÚÇÈÓÍÎ ÖÊÍÏÖÓÉÙÛÐÃ×ÛÊ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈúùøúõ ùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃõÊÛÎÈÉÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎ ê×ÆÓ×ÅÍÖÉÓÈ×ÙÍÆ×ÊÛÕ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÛÎØÓÏÌ×ÊÆÓÍÇÉÉÇÊÖÛÙ× Ø×ÖÓÎÓÈÓÍÎ éÈÛÖÖê×ÌÍÊÈ ùÍÊÊ×ÉÌÍÎØ×ÎÙ×ÖÊÍÏêÍÎôÓÐÐÉûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ AGENDA REGULAR MEETING SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL Wednesday, March 3, 2010 REGULAR MEETING –7:00 P.M. –CIVIC THEATER/COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL REPORT OF CITY CLERK ON POSTING OF AGENDA (Pursuant to Gov’t. Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on February 26, 2010) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COMMISSIONS & PUBLIC Oral Communications on Non-Agendized Items Any member of the public will be allowed to address the City Council for up to three (3) minutes on matters not on this agenda. Thelaw generally prohibits the council from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Council may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Council Direction to Staff. Oral Communications -Council Direction to Staff Instruction to Staff regarding actions on current Oral Communications. Communications from Boards and Commissions Council Direction to Staff Instruction to Staff regarding actions on current Communications from Boards & Commissions. ANNOUNCEMENTS CEREMONIAL ITEMS SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 1.“Unity in Community” Presentation Recommended action: Listen to short presentation by Kelly Green, Principal of Redwood Middle School. CONSENT CALENDAR The Consent Calendar contains routine items of business. Items in this section will be acted in one motion, unless removed by the Mayor or a Council member. Any member of the public may speak to an item on the Consent Calendar at this time, or request the Mayor remove an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Public Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. 2.City Council Meeting Minutes –February 17, 2010 Recommended action: Approve Minutes. 3.City Council Meeting Minutes –March 16, 2005 Recommended action: Approve minutes. 4.Treasurer’s Report for the Month Ended January 31, 2010 Recommended action: Review and accept the Treasurer’s Report for the month ended January 31, 2010. 5.Review of Accounts Payable Check Registers Recommended action: That the City Council review and accept the Check Registers for the following Accounts Payable payment cycles: February 11, 2010 February 18, 2010 6.Prospect Road Median No. 11 –Notice of Completion Recommended action: Move to accept the Prospect Road Median No. 11 project as complete and authorize the City manager to sign the Notice of Completion for the construction contract. 7.Joint Use Agreements with Santa Clara Valley Water District for Joe’s Trail Recommended action: Authorize the City Manager to execute following agreements with Santa Clara Valley Water District a Joint Use Agreement for Joe’s Trail. 8.Landscaping & Lighting Assessment District LLA-1; Resolutions initiating renewal of the District for FY 10-11 Recommended action: 1. Move to adopt the Resolution describing improvements and directing preparation of the Engineer’s Report. 2. Move to adopt the Resolution appointing the Attorney’s for the District. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.FY 2010/11 CommunityDevelopmentBlockGrant(CDBG) andCommunityGrant FundingApplications Recommended action: 1. Conduct the Public Hearing and accept public testimony presentations from applicants. 2. Review recommendations for streamlining the County CDBG program. 3. Continue the Public Hearing to March 17th to finalize grant allocations and approve a transfer of $13,964 in previously allocated CDBG funds. OLD BUSINESS 10.Google Fiber for Communities Request for Information Recommended action: Accept report and direct staff accordingly. 11.Resolution Authorizing ABAG to accept State Energy Program Funds on Behalf of the City of Saratoga Recommended action: Accept report and approve the attached resolution authorizing the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) to accept State Energy Program (SEP) funds on behalf of the City for a residential energy efficiency audit and retrofit program. NEW BUSINESS 12.Process for Allocation of Community Events Fund Recommended action: Accept report and select a process for allocating community event funds. 13.Review of site coverage requirements and impervious surface definition Recommended action: Direct staff regarding the preferred approach to revising site coverage requirements and impervious surface definition among one or more of the following options which are discussed later in more detail: 1. Create an exception process that would allow the Planning Commission to approve variations from the site coverage standards upon making specific findings (similar to the process for grading standards). 2. Change the definition of“impervious surface” to exclude specified types of surfaces such as artificial turf, gravel, or driveways. As a variation on this option the Code could exclude specific types of surfaces in specific zoning districts, such as the current exclusion for driveways in the Agricultural district. 3. Seek to address the goals of the site coverage requirements with a different approach such as a landscape ordinance. ADHOC & AGENCY ASSIGNMENT REPORTS MayorKathleen King ABAG CountyHCD Policy Committee HakoneFoundation Executive Committee West ValleyFlood Control Zone & Watershed Advisory Committee SCC CitiesAssociation Selection Committee Santa Clara CountyEmergency Council West Valley Mayorsand Managers Association Vice MayorJill Hunter HakoneFoundation Board HistoricalFoundation LibraryJoint Powers Association SASCC Sister CityLiaison VillageAdHoc Councilmember Howard Miller Chamberof Commerce City SchoolAd-Hoc Council FinanceCommittee Highway 9Adhoc KSAR Santa Clara County CitiesAssociation Board West Valley SolidWaste Joint Powers Association West Valley TransportationAuthority PAC Councilmember Susie Nagpal Highway 9Adhoc VillageAdHoc Councilmember Chuck Page City SchoolAd-Hoc Santa ClaraValley Water District Commission Saratoga MinisterialAssociation West Valley SanitationDistrict Council FinanceCommittee CITY COUNCIL ITEMS CITY MANAGER’S REPORT ADJOURNMENT In accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, copies of the staff reports and other materials provided to the City Council by City staff in connection with this agenda are available at the office of the Community Development Department Director at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Note that copies of materials distributed to the City Council concurrently with the posting of the agenda are also available on the City Website at www.saratoga.ca.us. Any materials distributed by staff after the posting of the agenda are made available for public review at the office of the City Clerk at the time they are distributed to the City Council. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (408) 868-1269. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II) Certificate of Posting of Agenda: I,Ann Sullivan, CityClerk for the City of Saratoga,declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the City Council forthe City of Saratoga was posted onFebruary 26, 2010,atthe City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga, CA 95070 and was available for public review at that location. The agenda is also available on the City’s website at www.saratoga.ca.us th Signed this 26dayof February 2010 at Saratoga, California. Ann Sullivan, CMC City Clerk NOTE: To view current or previous City Council meetings anytime, go tothe City Video Archives at www.saratoga.ca.us CITY OF SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CALENDAR 2010 3/3Regular Meeting – 5:15 Commission Interviews –Planning, HPC & Traffic Safety Commissions 6:30 p.m. Joint Meeting with Parks and Recreation Commission 3/17Regular Meeting –Joint Meeting with Sheriff’s Office and CountyFire 4/7Joint Meeting with Mt. Winery 4/21Regular Meeting –Regular Meeting –Joint Meeting with School Districts: Saratoga Union Elementary School District; Los Gatos-Saratoga Union High School District; Cupertino School District; Campbell School District Moreland School District; Fremont High School District; Sacred Heart; St. Andrews, and Campbell Union High School District 5/5Regular Meeting –Joint Meeting with Youth Commission 5/19Regular Meeting –Joint Meeting with Montalvo Arts 6/2Regular Meeting –Interview Youth commissioners for vacancies 6/16Regular Meeting –Joint Meeting with HOA Presidents 7/7Regular Meeting –Joint Meeting with Library Commission and Friends of the Saratoga Libraries 7/21Regular Meeting –Joint Meeting with SASCC SUMMER RECESS –NO COUNCIL MEETING 8/4(Tentative) SUMMER RECESS –NO COUNCIL MEETING 8/18 9/1Regular Meeting –Joint Meeting with West Valley Board of Trustees 9/15Regular Meeting –Joint meeting with Assemblymember Jim Beall 10/6Regular Meeting –Joint Meeting with Traffic Safety Commission 10/20Regular Meeting –Joint Meeting with Historical Foundation & Heritage Preservation Comm. 11/3Regular Meeting –Joint meeting with Saratoga Ministerial Association 11/17Regular Meeting -Joint Meeting with Hakone Foundation 11/30Council Reorganization 12/1Regular Meeting - 12/15RegularMeeting - SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: March3, 2010 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER: City Manager’s OfficeDave Anderson PREPARED BY:DIRECTOR: Ann Sullivan, City ClerkDave Anderson SUBJECT:“ Unity in Community”Presentation RECOMMENDED ACTION: Listen to short presentation by Kelly Green, Principal of Redwood Middle School. REPORT SUMMARY: “Unity in Community” is a student/parent project involving all the students at Redwood Middle Schooland many of their parents. Redwood Middle Schoolhas 42 homerooms and each one has chosen a non-profit organization and designed a project to support it. Parent volunteers have signed up to assist each homeroom to make Unity in Community a fun, memorable, and exciting learning event for all students. One of the goals of “Unity in Community” is to provide opportunities for students, staff and the parents to come together and engage in activities that will celebrate community spirit and promote community involvement. Already a lot of preparation and activities pertaining to this incredible project have already begun and the completion of the project will be the week of thth through the 12. For more information please visit the Redwood Middle School March 8 Website at www.saratogausd.org\redwood FISCAL IMPACTS: N/A CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION: N/A ALTERNATIVE ACTION: N/A FOLLOW UP ACTION: 1 N/A ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT: Posting ofthe agenda. ATTACHMENTS: None 2 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:AGENDA ITEM: March 3,2010 DEPARTMENT:CITY MANAGER: City Manager’s OfficeDave Anderson PREPARED BY:DIRECTOR: Ann Sullivan,City Clerk Dave Anderson SUBJECT:City CouncilMeetingMinutes–February 17,2010 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve minutes. REPORT SUMMARY: Approve minutes as submitted for February 17, 2010City CouncilRegular Meeting. FISCAL IMPACTS: N/A CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION: N/A ALTERNATIVE ACTION: N/A FOLLOW UP ACTION: Retain minutes for legislative history. ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A –MinutesfromFebruary 17, 2010City Council Regular Meeting. MINUTES SARATOGA REGULAR CITY COUNCILMEETING FEBRUARY 17, 2010 The City Council of the City of Saratoga met in Closed Session in the Administrative Conference Room at 5:30PM. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION Conference with Legal Counsel – Significant Exposure to Litigation: (Government Code Section 54956.9 (1 case) Initiation of Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(c) (1 case) MAYOR’S REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION Mayor King stated there was no reportable information. The City Council of the City of Saratoga held a Special Meeting with Supervisor Liz Knissin the Administrative Conference Room at 6:00 p.m. Mayor Kingcalled the Regular City Council meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL : PRESENTCouncilmembers Chuck Page, Howard Miller, Vice Mayor Jill Hunter, Mayor Kathleen King ABSENT:Susie Nagpal (Excused Absence) ALSODave Anderson, City Manager PRESENT:Richard Taylor, City Attorney Ann Sullivan, City Clerk Barbara Powell, Assistant City Manager Mary Furey, Administrative Services Director John Livingstone, Community Development Director Crystal Morrow, Administrative Analyst II REPORT OF CITY CLERK ON POSTING OF AGENDA Ann Sullivan, City Clerk, reported that pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, the agenda for the meeting of February 17, 2010 was properly posted on February 12, 2010. Mayor King suggestedCounty Supervisor Liz Kniss speak before Oral Communications. Council concurred with this suggestion. COMMUNICATIONS FROM COMMISSIONS & PUBLIC Liz Kniss, President of County Board of Supervisors,addressed the Council noting that she had met with Council in a Joint Meeting prior to the Regular Meeting. She expressed her appreciation forthe opportunity to have an informal discussion with the Council regardingthe various interactions that the County has with the City of Saratogasuch as Saratoga’s historic buildings, trails and other more in-depth issues.She spoke about the PrescriptionDrug Card that is available through the County and enabled byNACO, National Association of Counties. Supervisor Knissnoted citizens without medical coverage could receive up to a 20to 25% discount on their prescription drugs if they used this Prescription Drug Card; which is available online by visiting www.naco.com. In addition, Supervisor Kniss noted that the City of Saratoga was the recipient oftwo of the County’s largest grants–$225,000 to Hakone Gardens and Montalvo. Supervisor Kniss commented on the tragic plane crash in East Palo Alto earlier in the day and extended her condolences to the family members of the individuals that lost their lives in that plane crash. She concluded her report by extending her very best wishes to Councilmember Susie Nagpal. DIRECTION TO STAFF None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Lon Saavedra addressed the Council noting HakoneGarden’s second annualChinese th Lunar New Year Festival on Saturday, February 20from 12noonto 4p.m.at Hakone Gardens. Kathleen Casey addressed the Council on variousissues, including expenses for possible annexation of some hillside propertiesin Saratoga, Toll Gate, funding for Prospect median improvements, funding for Village sidewalk improvements, and how grant dollars are spent. DIRECTION TO STAFF None ANNOUNCEMENTS Councilmember Page noted the Chamber of Commerce is having their annual Crab Feed th on Saturday, February 20from 6:30 to 830p.m.atSacred Heart Church. Councilmember Miller notedthe AARP (Association of American Retired Persons) is th providing Income Tax assistanceevery Thursday from now untilApril 15from9:30 to 1:30 at the Saratoga Senior Center; adding that the service is available for seniors and low to middle income citizens.In addition, he reminded citizens to check outthe Saratoga Recreation Guide and invited people to register for some fun classes. Vice Mayor Hunternoted the City website needs to be updated reflecting the new name for the North Campus property, which is now “Saratoga Prospect Center”and to include Formerly NorthCampusin parentheses.She also stated the final color selection for the new Village Entrance sign has been made and the sign will be installed in approximately 2 threeweeks. In addition, she reminded everyone of the upcoming Mustard Faireevent on March 7and the St. Paddy’s Day celebration on March 13. CEREMONIAL ITEMS None SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None CONSENT CALENDAR CITY COUNCIL RETREATMINUTES –JANUARY 29, 2010 1. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve minutes. Councilmember Pageremoved thisitem for one minor correction. APPROVE CITY COUNCIL RETREAT PAGE/MILLER MOVED TO MINUTES –JANUARY 29, 2010AS AMENDED. MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL ABSENT. CITY COUNCIL MEETINGMINUTES –FEBRUARY 3, 2010 2. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve minutes. APPROVE CITY COUNCIL MEETING PAGE/HUNTER MOVED TO MINUTES –FEBRUARY 3, 2010. MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL ABSENT. CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MINUTES –FEBRUARY 8, 2010 3. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve minutes. APPROVE CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION PAGE/HUNTER MOVED TO MINUTES –FEBRUARY 8, 2010. MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL ABSENT. REVIEW OF ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTERS 4. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review and accept the Check Registers for the following Accounts Payable payment cycles: January 28, 2010 February 04, 2010 3 ACCEPT THE CHECK REGISTERS FOR THE PAGE/HUNTER MOVED TO FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAYMENT CYCLES: JANUARY 28, 2010 AND FEBRUARY 04, 2010. MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL ABSENT. APPROVAL OF AGENCY AGREEMENT FOR COUNTYWIDE AB 939 5. IMPLEMENTATION FEE STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept report and direct staff accordingly. APPROVE AGENCY AGREEMENT FOR PAGE/HUNTER MOVED TO COUNTYWIDE AB939 IMPLEMENTATION FEE. MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL ABSENT. APPROVAL OF AGENCY AGREEMENT FOR THE COUNTYWIDE 6. HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAM STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept report and direct staff accordingly. APPROVE AGENCY AGREEMENT FOR THE PAGE/HUNTER MOVED TO COUNTYWIDE HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAM. MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL ABSENT. RESOLUTION AMENDING COUNCIL AGENCY AND ADHOC 7. COMMITTEE LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution amending Resolution 09-066 appointing Council representatives to Committees, Agencies and Ad hoc Committees. RESOLUTION NO.10-008 ADOPT RESOLUTION AMENDING PAGE/HUNTER MOVED TO RESOLUTION 09-066 APPOINTING COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES TO COMMITTEES, AGENCIES AND AD HOC COMMITTEES. MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL ABSENT. PUBLIC HEARINGS None OLD BUSINESS 2010 SPRING ISSUE OFTHE SARATOGAN 8. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept report and direct staff accordingly. 4 Crystal Morrow, Administrative Analyst II, presented the staff report. Mayor King invited public comment. No one requested to speak on this item. DIRECTION TO STAFF : In addition to the proposed articles for the spring issue of The Saratogan, Council suggested adding the following articles: Shop localads; Reference the Prescription Drug Card in the healthy and active living in Saratoga article; Include a picture from the February 20, 2010 Hakone Chinese Lunar New Year Festival. In addition, Council recommended staff include the following on the City website: 2010 Census Banner reminding citizens to complete the 2010Census and include every person living in thehousehold;State loses $3,000 per under- counted person per year; and State of California may lose Congressional representation if number of citizens are under-counted; Include a “Frequently Asked Questions” link to the 2010 Census Banner addressing most commonly asked questions; Include a link on City website for residents to respond to regarding their interest in receiving an electronic version of The Saratogan. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF CITY FEES RELATED TO 2010 MUSTARD 9. FAIRE STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept report and direct staff accordingly. Assistant City Manager Barbara Powell presented the staff reportnoting the Mustard Faire Festival planners were asking for additional funding for the 2010 Festivalto offset the cost of City-related fees. Mayor King invited public comment. The following person requested to speak on this item: Kathleen Casey commented on several topics: Some minutes from Heritage Preservation Commission meetings areposted o onthe City website five months after the meetings; At the February 3, 2010 Council meeting a SASCC member volunteeredto o help outwith the 2010 Mustard Faire; Animals weren’t always on the Mustard Faire agenda; and o Mustard Fairewas originallycalled the Saratoga Blossom Festival. o Mayor King closed the public comment. Council discussedthe followingsuggestions: 5 Event planners for all City co-sponsored eventsacquire donations to help off- o set costs–matching dollar for dollar; Mustard Faire Festival eventbe under the auspices of the Saratoga/Monte o Sereno Community Foundation or Saratoga HistoricalFoundation. COUNCIL DIRECTION: All 2010Cityco-sponsoredevents to be agendized on an upcoming Council meeting agenda for discussion. ALLOCATE AN ADDITIONAL$1,000 FROM PAGE/MILLER MOVED TO THE FOURTH OF JULY EVENT FUND AND ALLOCATEAN ADDITIONAL $217.50 FROM COUNCIL’SCONTINGENCY FUND. MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL ABSENT. NEW BUSINESS GOOGLE FIBER FOR COMMUNITIES REQUEST FORINFORMATION 10. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept report and direct staff accordingly. Crystal Morrow, Administrative Analyst II, presented the staff report. Mayor King invited public comment and the following person requested to speak on this item: Narasimha Nookala spoke in support of this project and volunteered his assistance. No one else requested to speak on this item. Council discussed the various aspects involved if the Council decided to participate in this program and expressed concerns regarding: Inadequate information provided by Google o Associated costs o Staff time o Terrain in Saratoga o Three-city approach with Los Gatos and Monte Serenoto share costs o Councilmember Page volunteered to contact Town and City officials in Los Gatos and Monte Sereno to see if they would be interested in the Google fiber optic trial and partnering with the City of Saratoga. DIRECTION TO STAFF: Contact Google for additional information regarding the fiber optic project, outreach topartners andresidents in the community to see who may be interested in working with the City on its response to Google, and re-agendizethis item for Council consideration on the next Council meeting. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ADVANCEPLANNING 11. WORK PROGRAM FOR FY 2010/11 6 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed work program. John Livingstone presented the staff report. Mayor King invited public comment and the following person requested to speak on this item: Kathleen Casey voiced her concerns regardingroads and potential mud slides;and costs associated with the proposed work plan, the Housing Elementand annexations. No one else requested to speak on this item. CouncilmemberPage noted the definition of “pervious” in the State’s mandated Water Efficiency Landscape Model Ordinance is different than the City’s definition of pervious and asked if Saratoga’s definition wouldhave to be rectified prior to implementingthe State’smandated model ordinance. Director Livingstone noted that item would be coming back to Council March 3, 2010 for consideration. APPROVE THE PROPOSED WORK PLAN AND PAGE/MILLER MOVED TO ALLOCATE $14,000 FROM COUNCIL’S DISCRETIONARYFUND. MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL ABSENT. ADHOC & AGENCY ASSIGNMENT REPORTS MayorKathleen King –reported: County HCD Policy Committee–meets Thursday evening. West Valley Mayors and Managers Association–meets next week. Vice MayorJill Hunter–reported: Chamber of Commerce–she attended the last Chamber of Commerce meeting for Councilmember Millerand the Chamber ismoving forward with Taste of Saratogaas a two-day event. Historical Foundation–she attended the last meeting and notedthey are installing a modular storage (temporary building) behind the Museum; they are in theprocess of searching foranew executive director,and they continue to address landscape questions. Councilmember Howard Miller–reported: Santa Clara County Cities Association Board(SCCCA)–he attendedthe lastmeeting and spoke about the Census report and emphasized the importance of every person being counted; SCCCA will be receiving website assistance from the City of Saratoga;they discussed the medical marijuana ordinance; discussed new green house gas CEQA requirements in the Stateand the impact those requirements may have on cities. West Valley Solid Waste Joint Powers Association–noted he was voted to be the Chair Person of the JPA; they are getting a quote on commercial food waste recyclingto see what opportunities may be available; approved next year’s budget, noting it will impact the cities. 7 West Valley Transportation Authority PAC–discussion took place regarding measurement ofroad quality andtrafficdelays in order to acquire real data forSanta Clara Countytoreceiveits share of Federal funding; discussedblock grants and Saratoga is being consideredfor $500K for road work; and Highway 9 Safety Improvement is low on the grant list –Saratogacould receive$500K. Councilmember Susie Nagpal–Excused absence. Councilmember Chuck Page–reported: West Valley SanitationDistrict–met and the new Chairman, Ken Yaeger,asked to create a sub-committeeto look into the District’s Charter as a whole and the various funding allocations;rates may increase in 2011. CITY COUNCIL ITEMS None CITY MANAGER’S REPORT None ADJOURNMENT There being no additional business, Mayor King asked for a motion to adjourn. ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING 8:57PM. PAGE/HUNTER MOVED TO MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL ABSENT. Respectfully submitted, Ann Sullivan, CMC City Clerk 8 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:AGENDA ITEM: March 3,2010 DEPARTMENT:CITY MANAGER: City Manager’s OfficeDave Anderson PREPARED BY:DIRECTOR: Ann Sullivan,City Clerk Dave Anderson SUBJECT:City CouncilMeetingMinutes–March 16, 2005 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve minutes. REPORT SUMMARY: Approve minutes as submitted for March 16, 2005City CouncilRegular Meeting. FISCAL IMPACTS: N/A CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION: N/A ALTERNATIVE ACTION: N/A FOLLOW UP ACTION: Retain minutes for legislative history. ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A –MinutesfromMarch 16, 2005City Council Regular Meeting. MINUTES SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MARCH 16, 2005 The City Council of the City of Saratoga held a Study Session to discussPlanning Commission issues in the Administrative Conference Room,13777 Fruitvale Avenue, at 5:30 p.m. Mayor King called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and lead the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL PRESENT:Councilmembers Nick Streit, Ann Waltonsmith, Vice Mayor Norman Kline, Mayor Kathleen King ABSENT:Councilmember Aileen Kao ALSO Dave Anderson, City Manager PRESENT:Richard Taylor, City Attorney Lorie Tinfow, Assistant City Manager Cathleen Boyer, City Clerk John Livingstone, Interim Community Development Director John Cherbone, Public Works Director REPORT OF CITY CLERK ON POSTING OF AGENDA FOR MARCH 16, 2005 Cathleen Boyer, City Clerk, reported that pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, the agenda for the meeting of March 16, 2005 was properly posted on March 10, 2005. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS None COMMUNICATIONS FROMCOMMISSIONS & PUBLIC None COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF None ANNOUNCEMENTS None CEREMONIAL ITEMS 1A.APPOINTMENT OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS AND OATH OF OFFICE STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution and administer Oath of Office. RESOLUTION: 05-014 APPOINT MANNY CAPPELLO, WALTONSMITH/KLINE MOVED TO JILL HUNTER, AND ROBERT KUNDTZ TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, EFFECTIVE APRIL 1, 2005 . MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH KAO ABSENT. City Clerk Boyer administered the Oath of Office to the new Commissioners. 1B.PROCLAMATION DECLARINGMARCH 20, 2005 “ASSYRIAN DAY” STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Acknowledge proclamation. Mayor King acknowledged the proclamation. 1C.PROCLAMATION DECLARINGMARCH 26, 2005 “GREEK INDEPENDENCE DAY” STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Acknowledge proclamation. Mayor King acknowledged the proclamation. 1D.PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 5, 2005 “TARTAN DAY” STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Acknowledge proclamation. Mayor King acknowledged the proclamation. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 2.CARL GUARDINO, PRESIDENT AND CEO/SILICON VALLEY LEADERSHIPGROUP SANTA CLARA COUNTY TRAFFIC RELIEF LEGISLATION –SB 680 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution. Carl Guardino, CEO of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group,(formerly known as the Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group)addressed the Council. Mr. Guardino requested the City’s support of the adoption of SB 680,the Santa Clara County Traffic Relief bill. This proposed bill would apply a$5 vehicle registration surcharge for eight years and would generate$280Kin revenuefor Saratoga.The generated funds would be appliedto three local uses:one third for Saratoga transportation improvements, one third for a competitive pool of funds for multi- city use, and one third for Tier 1A County Expressway improvements. RESOLUTION: 05-017 . 2 ADOPT RESOLUTION TO WALTONSMITH/KLINE MOVED TO SUPPORT SB 680. MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITHCOUNCILMEMBER . KAO ABSENT CONSENT CALENDAR 3A.APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MINUTES –JANUARY 19, 2005 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve minutes. APPROVE CITY COUNCIL STREIT/WALTONSMITH MOVED TO MINUTES FROM JANUARY 19, 2005 . MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBERKAO ABSENT. 3B.APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MINUTES –FEBRUARY 2, 2005 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve minutes. APPROVE CITY COUNCIL STREIT/WALTONSMITH MOVED TO MINUTES FROM FEBRUARY 2, 2005 . MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER KAO ABSENT. 3C.APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MINUTES STUDY SESSION –MARCH 2, 2005 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve minutes. APPROVE CITY COUNCIL STREIT/WALTONSMITH MOVED TO MINUTES FROM STUDY SESSION-MARCH 2, 2005 . MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER KAO ABSENT. 3D.REVIEW OF CHECK REGISTER STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept check register. ACCEPT CHECK REGISTER STREIT/WALTONSMITHMOVED TO . MOTION PASSED4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER KAO ABSENT. 3E.TREASURER’S REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDED FEBRUARY 2005 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept and file report. ACCEPT TREASURER’S REPORT STREIT/WALTONSMITHMOVED TO FOR MONTH ENDED FEBRUARY 2005 . MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER KAO ABSENT. 3 3F. CIVIC THEATER SOUND SYSTEM PROJECT –AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Award construction contract to Lloyd F. McKinney Associates, Inc. in the amount of $37,936 and authorize City Manager to executethe same. AWARD CONSTRUCTION STREIT/WALTONSMITHMOVED TO CONTRACT TO LLOYD F. MCKINNEY ASSOCIATES, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $37,936 AND AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE SAME. MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER KAO ABSENT. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.FY 2005/2006 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conduct the public hearing; adopt resolution. John Livingstone, Interim Community Development Director, presented staff report. Interim Director Livingstone explained the distribution of the FY 2005-2006, $156KCDBG funds. Councilinquiredwhether or notthe SHARP Program funds could be used for accessibility upgradesto public buildings–such as the McWilliams House. City Manager Anderson clarifiedthat these funds are only available for qualified low income home owners wishing to improve their homes –thereby improving the neighborhood. Mr. Andersonaddedthe hearing process would allow suggestions for public buildings. Mayor King opened the Public Hearing for comment. The following person requested to speak on this item: Genie Dee, Director ofthe Senior Center, expressed herappreciation for past funds and askedthat Council consider sendinga letter to Congress requesting the continuation of future funding. No one else requested to speak on this item. Mayor King closed the Public Hearing. Councilmember Waltonsmith commented onthe need to develop the McWilliams House;specifically to upgrade the bathrooms and to make the facilitymore accessible and rentable.Sheaskedthat Council consider using the $23,810Kfrom the SHARP Program forproviding ADA access tothe Historical building. 4 Councilmember Streit concurred with Councilmember Waltonsmith, adding that the $23,810K should be moved into the “HistoricalPark” to include the McWilliams House and/or the Book-Go-Around. He concluded by saying that staff could bring a proposalback to Council regarding ADA access in that area. RESOLUTION: 05-015 ADOPT RESOLUTION WALTONSMITH/STREIT MOVED TO AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SUBMIT CDBG GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FY 2005/2006 TOTALING $156,491 AS AMENDED; ALLOCATING $23,810K FROM THE SHARP PROGRAM TO BE USED FOR ADA ACCESS TO THE HISTORICAL PARKAREA .MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER KAO ABSENT. 5.ORDINANCE AMENDING PROCEDURES FOR HIRING AND REMOVING DEPARTMENT DIRECTORS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Open the public meetting; Introduce and waive first reading of the ordinance; Direct staff to place the second reading and adoption of the ordinance on the consent calendar for the next regular Council meeting. Richard Taylor,City Attorney,presented the staff report. City Attorney Taylor explained that earlier this year Council had approved a Memorandum of Understanding with the Saratoga Manager’s Organization (SMO), noting that there is acontradiction in the existing City Code regarding hiring and removing Department Managers. He noted one area of the Code states that Department Managers serve at the pleasure of the City Manager and another section of the Code states that Department Managers serve at the pleasure of the City Manager subject to Council’s confirmation of all hiring and firing decisions. In order to maintain the Manager’s status of at will employees as noted in the Employment Agreement, the City Code needs to be amended to remove the Council’s authority for the approval of those hiring and firing decisions; adding that this would be consistent with the standard form of City Manager government where Council sets policy and City Manager does hiring and firing andday-to-day administration of the City. Councilmember Waltonsmith expressed concerns as to the procedure in the absence of the City Manager City Attorney Taylor noted the Assistant City Manager serves as the Acting City Manager in the absence of the CityManager. Councilmember Streit inquired about the process and recourse if the Council wasn’t in agreement with the hiring and firing decisions of the City Manager. City Attorney Taylor responded that the Council hires and fires the City Manager and if Council feels the City Manager isn’t making responsible decisions regarding this matter it can be addressed in his/her annual employment review. He added, 5 since Council sets policy, Council could provide their input regarding hiring and firing policies. Mayor King asked when this would become effective if Council approved this Ordinance amendment. City Attorney Taylor noted it would become effective 30 days after the second reading, which would be held on the first Council meeting in April. WAIVE THE FIRST READING OF THE STREIT/KLINE MOVED TO ORDINANCE ANDDIRECTEDSTAFF TO PLACE THE SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF THE ORDINANCE ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR THE NEXT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING . MOTION PASSED 4-0-1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER KAO ABSENT. OLD BUSINESS 6.SALE OF NORTH CAMPUS -PROCESS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept report and direct staff accordingly. John Cherbone, Public Works Director, presented the staff report. th Director Cherbone stated that at the February 16City Council meeting, Council approved moving forward with the sale of the North Campus. Staff identified three options for the sale/development of the North Campus: 1.Sell property as is 2.Sell property asis with an approved Tentative Map 3.Sell property via individual lots by subdividing the land and constructing infrastructureimprovements. City Council choseoption two. Director Cherbone stated that the NorthCampus was purchased in 2002 at a cost of $4.5 million and at the same time itwas appraised at $6.3 million. It can be assumedthat the property would sell for more that the purchase price. Staff recommendedthat the City perform as much work in-house as possible to control costs: The Public Works Department will act as the lead in the process and will utilize Engineering Staff and the City Surveyor to generate the Tentative Map. The Planning Department Staff and the City Attorney will work on the General Plan Amendment and Environmental Study. The City Traffic Engineer and City Geologist will prepare reports in their respectiveareas. The City Attorney will act as the selling agent and provide legal expertise regarding the sale. Director Cherbone outlinedthe process and timeline. He stated the costs will not exceed $100K, adding thatmost of it would be going towardsenvironmental work. 6 Mayor King opened thePublic Hearing for comment. The following person requested to speak on this item: Jack Mallory addressed the Council and asked that they delay plans to move ahead with the sale of the North Campus and allow the Citizen’s Committee 90 days to raise fundsto purchase the property for community use. No one else requested to speak on this item. Mayor King closed the Public Hearing. Council discussed the costs involved if they delay moving forward with the process and grant the Citizen’s Committee the 90 daysto raise funds. Council also asked if staff could continue to move forward with some of the in- house work in order to remain within the proposed timeline. City Attorney Taylor noted staff would want to hold off onthe appraisal until after the Tentative Map is prepared so that the appraiser would know exactly what the conditions would be on the development of the property. He added that it would be prudent to continue moving forward with the EnvironmentalStudy. Attorney Taylor noted the other option would be that the property be sold as is without the Tentative Map. Mayor King inquired about funding for the various aspects of moving forward with the project. Public Works Director John Cherbone noted that staff would be bringing a budget resolution to the next meeting for Council’s consideration to fund the process. DIRECTION TO STAFF : Council directedStaff to continue moving forward with the process; allow the Citizen’s Committee to continue with their fund raising effortsand the Committee must provide status updates to the Council for the next 30 to 45 days. 7.COMMISSION ADHOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept recommendation from AdHoc and provide direction to staff regarding resources allocated to support Commissions. Lorie Tinfow, Assistant City Manager, presentedthestaff report. Ms Tinfownoted that while it was understood that it was a large time commitment for staff to be part of the current Commissions, the Commission chairs voiced concernsabout abandoning the commission structure due to budget concerns and asked to be allowed to provide input to the process. Ms. Tinfownoted that Mayor King and Vice Mayor Kline offered to serve as an Adhoc Committee to collect input from the Commissions. She added that 7 subsequently, the Commission chairs met with staff and provided some plausible suggestions on how to reduce staff resources. Based on those suggestions and additional discussion, the Adhoc Committee came up with the recommendation that in order to maintain status quo for both the Planning Commission and Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) –includingchanging the HPC’s focus to “policy” –they recommended: Changing the Finance Commission to meet on an Adhoc basic as needed o and to focus only on policy areas as defined by Council; Public Safety Commission to be converted to “Traffic Safety Commission” o –with a reduced scope; and Library Commission and the new Traffic Safety Commission to meet only o five (5) times per year, i.e., every other month and cancelling the meetings duringthe summermonths;and focusing only on policy issues as defined by Council or other responsibilities that Council would assign; Fund the Youth Commission as directed by Council at last week’s Study o Session; Suspend for one (1) year, and evaluate resources the following year, the o Arts Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission; Distribute meeting agendas electronicallyrather than via the U.S. Mail; o Reduce the number of non-regulatory (Finance, Traffic and Library) o commissioners by attrition from seven to five; Fix meeting start and end times; o Assign responsibility for minutes preparation to a commissioner on the o Finance, Public Safetyand Library Commissions Ms. Tinfow concluded by noting that Council could: Choose to maintain Commission support at current levels with finance reductions made at other levels next year; Adopt another configuration of supporting the Commissions; or Suspend all Commissions Discussion took place regarding thepossibility of suspending the Library Commissiontemporarily and relyingonthe Friends of the Library to provide recommendations as needed to the Council. Vice Mayor Kline noted the functions of the Library Commission are quite different than the functions of the Friends of the Library, which is a revenue- generating entity, not a policy generating body; and there could be a number of legal issues if the City relied on the Friends of the Library for policy advice. Councilmember Streit inquired about having the Library and Public Safety Commission meet quarterly rather than five (5) times a year in order to reduce staff time. Mayor King responded that the Adhoc Committee felt that since the meetings are cancelled during the summer months it would be reasonable to meet every other month during the rest of the year. Councilmember Streit noted that it seems like staff would be more impacted with meetings every other month versus quarterly. 8 Councilmember Waltonsmith noted she did not favor suspending the Arts Commission. Mayor King opened the Public Hearing for comment. The following people requested to speak on this item: Lee Murray spoke in favor of retaining the Arts Commissionand voiced his concerns regarding the “art wall” in the Library and who would provide art to the Library if the Arts Commission is no longer responsible for it. Elaine Clabeauxspoke in favor of retaining the Parks and Recreation. Ruth Gipsteinspoke in favor of retaining the Library Commission. Mayor King closed the Public Hearing. Council discussed various options regarding the “art wall” in the Library and how it could be continued in the absence of the Arts Commission. Some suggestions were to have the Library Commission be responsible for the art or havemembers of the Art Commission volunteerto provide art for the “art wall”. Assistant City ManagerLorie Tinfow asked that Council allow staff some time to determine what could be done about the “art wall”. Councilmember Waltonsmith noted that if the Arts Commission is going to be suspended we may have to accept the reality that art may no longer be available for the “art wall”.She also raised the question as to trail management if there is no Trail Sub-committee, which is part of the Parks and Recreation Commission. Public Works Director Cherbone noted that since the trails are pedestrian related, there may be a possibility thatthe Trails Committee could be a Sub-committee of the new Traffic Commission as a pedestrian oriented body that looks at pedestrian issues. The Trails Committee provides a great service to the City by providing input to City staff and they don’t require a lot of staff time. They are a Sub- committee of the Parks and Recreation Commission and they couldn’t be a stand- alone committee; they would haveto be attached to a body that they report to. City Attorney Taylor added that if a group of residents are providing the services that Director Cherbone just noted, it is not considered “policy” advice, it is basically considered as a group of people serving as volunteers, collecting information and providing it to staff. DIRECTION TO STAFF : Council directed Staff to:1) suspend the Arts and Parks &Recreation Commissions for one year; 2) staff toreport back to Council regarding the Art Wall in the Saratoga Library; 3)staff to look into the possibility of the Trails Sub- committee movingtothe Public Safety Commission; 4)Public Safetyand Library Commissions will meet 4 times a year; 5)Finance Commission will meet as needed;and 6)Planning Commissionand Heritage Preservation Commission 9 (HPC) will remain status quowith HPC’s focus on “policy”. Mayor King declareda 10 minute break at 10:30pm. Mayor King reconvenedthe Regular meeting at 10:40pm. 8.DOG OFF-LEASH HOURS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept report and direct staff accordingly. John Cherbone, Public Works Director, presented the staff report. Director Cherbone noted that Council could provide direction regarding Option 1 – 3 as listed: Option 1: Off-leash Dog Hours Via Permit whereby any Saratoga resident who wishes to utilize a City Park for off-leash activities would be allowed to do so, but first must obtain a permit from the City. Option 2: Enclosed Off-Leash Area Find an area that is suitable to enclosewith a fence system that allows dog owners to freely run their animals. Option 3: Continue Current Ordinance This option would continue the status quo regarding off-leash dogs. Tom Soukup,Chairof the AdHoc Off Leash Task Force, addressed the Council and noted that no single off-leash option was favored unanimouslyby the Adhoc Task Force. Mayor King invited public comment. Citizen Marjoriespoke in favor of a dog off-leash hour’s Ordinance. Elaine Clabeaux spoke in support of Option 2; however she recommended that Council retain the existing ordinance. Margaret Metcalf spoke in support of having a 3 month trial period tosee what the results would be regarding the off-leash fenced-in area. Citizen Stan suggested Council allowthe Parks and Recreation Commission and staffto work out a trial basis in order to collect data so that a reasonable decision can be made. Mayor King closed the public comment. COUNCIL CONSENSUSAND DIRECTION : Councildetermined that the City did not have sufficient funding to consider any 10 dog off-leash hour’soption,anddirected staff to maintain the current leash ordinance. 9.REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY DETERMINATION STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept report prepared by Rosenow Spevak Group and the study’s conclusion that a Redevelopmentis not a viable option for Saratoga. Lorie Tinfow, Assistant City Manager, presented the staff report. COUNCIL CONSENSUSAND DIRECTION: Consensus bythe City Council was to accept report prepared by Rosenow Spevak Group and the study’s conclusion that aRedevelopment is not a viable option for . Saratoga and redirectthe account balance back into the CIP NEW BUSINESS 10.REQUEST FROM LIBRARY COMMISSION TO INSTALL A MONUMENT SIGN ON FRUITVALE AVENUE STAFF RECOMMENDATION : Accept recommendation and adopt budget resolution. Cathleen Boyer, City Clerk, presented the staff report. City Clerk Boyer explained that alarge wooden sign that read “Saratoga Library” was positioned in the orchard near the corner of Saratoga Avenue and Fruitvale Avenue prior tothe orchard improvements implemented during the library construction activities.She noted that duringa joint meeting with the City Council in 2004, the Friends of the Saratoga Libraries requested that a replacement sign similar to the one placed near the driveway entrance to the Saratoga Library be installed in roughly the same place as the previous one. The City Council directed the Friends of the Saratoga Libraries to take the request to the Library Commission.The Library Commission discussed the request and agreed to explore the options. A Library Signage Subcommittee was formed to work with the contractor who designed the existing sign at the Library. InJanuary 2005, the Subcommittee met with the City’s orchard maintenance , contractorMatt Novakovich, who approved the location of the sign. The Heritage Preservation Commission also approved the location.At the February 23, 2005, Library Commission meeting, staff presented two sign options –one that included the City and County Library’s logosand one without the logos. The Commission unanimously voted to support the sign option that included the logos. The cost of either option is $8,500; this cost does not include installation. Public Works Director John Cherbone indicated that his staffcould install the sign. Council discussed this item and concurred that the staff report did not provide sufficient data and financial information for them to make a knowledgeable 11 decision. Council also concurred that the Library Commission would need to absorb more of the financial responsibilities. DIRECTION TO STAFF : Council deferred this item to the next scheduled Council meeting and asked that staff provide a detailed financial spread sheetnoting fund balance, projected maintenance costs, and where the funds are coming from to cover the cost of the Library sign. ADHOC & AGENCY ASSIGNMENT REPORTS Mayor Kathleen King –reported: Santa Clara County Cities Association–the Association voted onseveral items: SCVWD legislation SB680 and AB211 legislation.City Manager Dave Anderson explained AB211 –Radio Interoperability Project and notedthat this bill would open up the Public Safety Communications market; whereby the vendors would utilize a more open system in order to integrate the different communications systems. Mayor King added that there is an Emergency Preparedness meeting scheduled for April th 7and asked if Vice Mayor Kline could attend in her place. West Valley Mayors and Managers Association–there was discussion onannexation issues at the last meetingand they are hoping to have a LAFCO representative speak at the next scheduled meeting. : Vice Mayor Norman Kline –reported County Cities Association Legislative Task Force–he was unable to attend themeeting. Library Joint Powers Association–the JPA discussed the ballotmeasure supportinga tax increaseto fundadditional library hourswhich would help keep the library open on Mondays. st Valley Transportation Authority PAC–there is a workshop April 1and he will be giving a presentation on “How to Prioritize Measure A Funds”. Village AdHoc–they are looking at Village improvements that would not be costly to the City –such as “parking”. Design Review AdHoc–ongoing efforts to improve efficiency and consistency. Councilmember Nick Streit –reported: West Valley Solid Waste Joint Powers Association–they have a tentative agreement with Waste Management. Councilmember Ann Waltonsmith –reported: KSAR Community Access TV Board–they are experiencing funding issues andtheyare movingtowards anon-profit status. Saratoga Historic Foundation–Calendar items: Membership Meeting and Pot Luck on March 21, 6:30pm; Walking tours begin at SaratogaMuseumon April 3; Spring Cleanup Dayat the museumApril 9;Saratoga Garden toursMay 7. Sister City Liaison–Potluck on March 18 at 6p.m.at theSenior Center. 12 CITY COUNCIL ITEMS Mayor King noted there is a new shop in the Village –Bella Mia Bridal and a new Italian restaurant opening up and encouraged fellow Council members to visit these establishments and welcome them to the Village. CITY MANAGER’S REPORT None There being no further business, Mayor King announced Council would proceed to the Administrative Conference Room for Closed Session. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS Conference with Legal Counsel –Threatened Litigation: Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(b): (1 potential case) The Regular meeting adjourned at 11:20p.m. Council proceeded to the Administrative Conference Room for Closed Session. Respectfully submittedfor Cathleen Boyer, Ann Sullivan, CMC City Clerk 13 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: March 3, 2010 DEPARTMENT:CITY MANAGER: Finance & Administrative Services Dave Anderson PREPARED BY:DEPT HEAD: Ann Xu, AccountantMary Furey SUBJECT: Treasurer’s Report for the Month Ended January 31, 2010 RECOMMENDED ACTION Review and accept the Treasurer’s Report for the month ended January 31, 2010. REPORT SUMMARY California government code section 41004 requires that the City Treasurer (the Municipal Code of the City of Saratoga, Article 2-20, Section 2-20.035, designates the City Manager as the City Treasurer) submit to the City Clerk and the legislative body a written report and accounting of all receipts, disbursements, and fund balances. Section 41004 . Regularly, at least once each month, the City Treasurer shall submit to the City Clerk a written report and accounting of all receipts, disbursements, and fund balances. He shall file a copy with the legislative body. The following attachments provide various financial transaction data for the City of Saratoga’s Funds collectively as well as specifically for the City’s General (Operating) Fund, including an st attachment from the State Treasurer’s Office of Quarterly LAIF rates from the 1 Quarter of 1977 to present. FISCAL IMPACT Cash and Investments Balance by Fund As of January 31, 2010, the City had $125,362 in cash deposit at Comerica bank, and $13,544,314 on deposit with LAIF. Council Policy on operating reserve funds, adopted on April 20, 1994, states that: for cash flow purposes, to avoid occurrence of dry period financing, pooled cash from all funds should not be allowed to fall below $2,000,000. The total pooled cash balance as of January 31, 2010 is $13,669,676 and exceeds the minimum limit required. Cash Summary Unrestricted Cash Comerica Bank125,362$ Deposit with LAIF13,544,314$ Total Unrestricted Cash13,669,676$ The Fund Balance schedule presented on the following page represents actual funding available for all funds at the end of the monthly period. This amount differs from the above Cash Summary schedule as assets and liabilities are components of the fund balance. As illustrated in the summary below, Total Unrestricted Cash is adjusted by the addition of Total Assets less the amount of Total Liabilities to arrive at the Ending Fund Balance – which represents the actual amount of funds available. Adjusting Cash to Ending Fund Balance Total Unrestricted Cash13,669,676$ Plus: Assets209,892 Less: Liabilities (1,269,059) Ending Fund Balance12,$610,509 CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION The City would not be in compliance with Government Code Section 41004. ALTERNATIVE ACTION N/A FOLLOW UP ACTION N/A ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT N/A ATTACHMENTS A – Change in Total Fund Balances by Fund B – Change in Total Fund Balances by CIP Project C – Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Quarterly Apportionment Rates ATTACHMENT A CHANGES IN TOTAL FUND BALANCE Fund Increase/ Fund Balance (Decrease) Current Current Balance Fund Description7/1/09 Jul-Dec Revenue Expenditure Transfers 1/31/10 General Undesignated Unreserved Balance857,524 (1,322,890) 2,388,620 1,662,158 - 261,097 Reserved Fund Balance: Petty Cash Reserve1,300 - - - - 1,300 Designated Fund Balances:- - Designated for Operations 2,870,140 - - - - 2,870,140 Designated Economic Uncertainty 1, -500,000 - - - 1,500,000 Designated for Development 707,380 - - - (75,000) 632,380 Designated for Environmental 613,182 - - - (50,000) 563,182 Designated for Uncollected Deposits182,159 - - - - 182,159 Designated for Mid Pen Open Space 250,000 - - - (250,000) - Designated for Hillside Reserve300,000 - - - - 300,000 Designated for CIP Matching Grant600,000 - - - - 600,000 Designated for CIP Transfer 300,000 - - - (300,000) - Designated for Economic Stability25,000 - - - (25,000) - Designated for Carryforward22,000 - - - (22,000) - Special Revenue Landscape/Lighting Districts359,917 (97,939) 168,724 57,762 - 372,941 CDBG Federal Grants- (42,859) - - - (42,859) SHARP Loan209,175 479 - - - 209,655 Capital Project Street Projects1,926,230 (124,004) 19,292 86,403 - 1,735,116 Park and Trail Projects542,045 96,567 - 1,120 - 637,492 Facility Improvement Projects953,833 (377,069) 5,660 108,441 - 473,984 Administrative Projects163,910 17,280 - 1,597 - 179,593 Tree Fine Fund62,943 (27,197) - 2,545 - 33,200 CIP Grant Fund(200,477) (108,104) 39,928 258,412 - (527,065) Gas Tax Fund62,495 66,129 - 174,666 - (46,042) Debt Service Library Bond (660,026)931,361 511,059 336,828 445,566 Internal Service Fund Liability/Risk Management202,872 (89,216) 64,660 6,522 - 171,793 Workers Compensation123,034 68,634 62,500 2,172 - 251,997 Office Stores Fund39,633 6,137 10,000 3,104 - 52,666 Information Technology Services 174,838 17,736 100,000 35,858 - 256,716 106,052 Equipment Maintenance56,654 17,092 56,250 23,944 - Building Maintenance208,842 41,043 187,500 61,498 - 375,888 Equipment Replacement 87,655153,214 50,000 7,824 - 283,044 Technology Replacement (21,683)315,290 14,502 318 - 307,791 Trust/Agency Library Fund354,394 (2,556) - - - 351,838 KSAR - Community Access TV84,603 (17,607) 14,559 10,669 - 70,886 Total City14,953,491 (2,472,397) 3,693,254 2,841,841 (722,000) 12,610,509 ATTACHMENT B FUND BALANCES BY CIP PROJECT Fund Increase/ Fund Balance (Decrease) Current Current Balance CIP Funds/Projects7/1/09 Jul-Dec Revenue Expenditure Transfers 1/31/10 Street Projects Traffic Safety90,472 (15,934) - - 74,538 Highway 9 Safety Project45,129 - 8,200 - 53,329 Annual Street Resurfacing Project233,602 112,780 11,092 83,880 273,595 Sidewalks Annual Project18,935 (7,184) - - 11,751 Saratoga Sunnyvale Road Resurfacing64,972 (1,093) - - 63,879 Traffic Signal @ Verde Vista Lane90,000 - - - 90,000 Fourth Street Bridge100,000 - - - 100,000 Quito Road Bridge Replacement Design9,730 - - - 9,730 Quito Road Bridge Construction115,726 - - - 115,726 Village Newsrack Enclosure23,307 (10,723) - - 12,584 Village Façade Program18,815 (2,837) - - 15,978 Solar Power Radar Feedback Signs24,158 - - - 24,158 El Quito Area Curb Replacement37,553 - - - 37,553 Sobey Road Culvert Repair150,000 - - - 150,000 Annual Storm Drain Upgrade246 (45,413) - - (45,167) Village Trees & Lights at Sidestreets25,336 - - - 25,336 Village Pedestrian Enhancement9,128 (146) - - 8,982 Prospect Road Median151,036 (96,850) - 2,523 51,663 City Entrance Sign/Monument23,788 - - - 23,788 Village-Streetscape Impv 517,188 - - - 517,188 Saratoga-Sunnyvale/Gateway Sidewalk4,107 (585) - - 3,522 Comer Drive Retaining Wall173,003 (56,020) - - 116,983 Total Street Projects1,926,230 (124,004) 19,292 86,403 - 1,735,116 Parks & Trails Hakone Garden Koi Pond49,150 (23) - - 49,127 EL Quito Park Improvements43,905 - - - 43,905 Wildwood Park - Water Feature/Seating275 - - - 275 Historical Park Landscape33,890 (446) - 2,488 30,956 Hakone Garden Retaining Wall & D/W142,829 - - - 142,829 Hakone Garden Upper Moon House 125,000 - - - 125,000 Kevin Moran Improvements69,083 (93,380) - (2,488) (21,809) West Valley Soccer Field(29,176) - - - (29,176) Park/Trail Repairs7,748 (4,878) - - 2,870 Trail Segment #3 Repair68,606 (7,912) - - 60,694 Teerlink Ranch Trail14,850 (14,850) - - - Tank Trail Repair60,695 (31,945) - 1,120 27,630 Mid Pen O/S Land Purchase- 250,000 - - 250,000 CIP Allocation Fund15,885 - - - 15,885 Total Parks & Trails602,741 96,567 - 1,120 - 698,188 Facility Improvements Warner Hutton House Improvements813 - - - 813 Facility Projects108,643 (73,236) - - 35,407 Civic Center Improvement4,294 (340) - - 3,954 Theater Improvement68,518 (10,293) 5,660 16,329 47,556 Corp Yard - Men's Restroom1,829 20,781 - 23,075 (464) Fire Alarm at McWilliams & Museum11,371 - - - 11,371 North Campus Improvements43,960 (38,433) - - 5,528 North Campus - Bldg Removal73,250 (72,866) - 171 213 HVAC System Upgrade- 125,000 - - 125,000 Multi-Purpose Room Fund250,000 (250,000) - - - Corp Yard Solar Project93,250 125,000 - - 218,250 Library HVAC Upgrade276,143 (207,681) - 68,867 (405) Library - EXT Improvement10,000 5,000 - - 15,000 McWilliams House Improvement10,000 - - - 10,000 Historical Park Fire Alarm System1,762 - - - 1,762 Total Facility Improvements953,833 (377,069) 5,660 108,441 - 473,984 Administrative Projects Financial System Upgrade3,534 - - - 3,534 Document Imaging Project86,780 - - 1,597 85,183 CDD Document Imaging Project36,635 (4,646) - - 31,989 Website Development Project30,959 (28,074) - - 2,885 IT Emergency Power Back- 10,000 - - 10,000 IT Server Room A/C- 40,000 - - 40,000 KSAR Equip Upgrades6,002 - - - 6,002 Total Administrative Projects163,910 17,280 - 1,597 - 179,593 Tree Fine Fund Tree Fine Fund62,943 (27,197) - 2,545 33,200 CIP Fund CIP Grant Fund(200,477) (108,104) 39,928 258,412 (527,065) Gax Fund Gas Tax Fund62,495 66,129 - 174,666 (46,042) Total CIP Funds3,510,979 (456,398) 64,880 633,184 - 2,546,973 ATTACHMENT C SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:AGENDA ITEM: March 3, 2010 DEPARTMENT:CITY MANAGER: Finance & Administrative ServicesDave Anderson PREPARED BY:DEPT. DIRECTOR: Melanie WhittakerMary Furey SUBJECT: Review of Accounts Payable Check Registers RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council review and accept the Check Registers for the following Accounts Payable payment cycles: February 11, 2010 February 18, 2010 REPORT SUMMARY: Attached are the Check Registers for: Prior Check Register Ending Starting Ending Total Checks DateCheck No. Type of ChecksDateCheck No.Check No.ChecksAmountReleased Accounts Payable02/11/101143271143764990,186.0002/11/1002/04/10114326 Accounts Payable02/18/1011437711443053462,476.6802/18/1002/11/10114376 The following is a list of Accounts Payable checks issued for more than $20,000 and a brief description of the expenditure: AP DateCheck No. Issued toFundDept.PurposeAmount 02/11/10None CRW IndustriesCIP - Facility ProjectFacilitiesCorp Yard Lavatory 02/18/10114391 38,189.00 02/18/10114399Hydrotec IrrigationCIP - Parks ProjectPublic WorksHistorical Museum - 22,094.22 Irrigation install County of SC - Office GeneralPublic SafetyMonthly Service - 02/18/10114409 344,573.67 of SheriffLaw Enforcement The following are Accounts Payable checks that were voided or manually issued: AP DateCheck No. Issued toDescriptionAmount 02/11/10112483Evans, MaryVoid - Stale Dated (300.00) 02/18/10None The following is a list of cash reduction by fund: Fund #AP 02/11AP 11/18Total Fund Description 111General 43,889.90 380,132.01 424,021.91 241Arroyo de Saratoga Landscape 85.00 56.21 141.21 242Bonnet Way Landscape 135.00 146.44 281.44 243Carnelian Glen 135.00 135.00 244Cunningham/Glasgow Landscape 150.00 34.02 184.02 245Fredericksburg Landscape 132.00 34.02 166.02 246Greenbriar Landscape 406.00 161.06 567.06 247Kerwin Ranch Landscape 311.00 311.00 248Leutar Court Landscape 85.00 56.20 141.20 249Manor Drive Landscape 160.00 160.00 251McCartysville Landscape 180.00 223.28 403.28 252Prides Crossing Landscape 448.00 167.85 615.85 253Saratoga Legends Landscape 158.00 158.00 254Sunland Park Landscape 203.00 203.00 255Tricia Woods Landscape 45.00 167.85 212.85 271Beauchamps Landscape 85.00 85.00 272Bellgrove Landscape 1,598.00 347.87 1,945.87 273Gateway Landscape 203.00 178.13 381.13 274Horseshoe Landscape/Lighting 320.00 320.00 275Quito Lighting 165.00 165.00 276Tollgate LLD 90.00 90.00 411CIP Street Projects 13,599.54 3,319.58 16,919.12 412CIP Parks Projects 880.00 26,144.22 27,024.22 413CIP Facility Projects 17,070.20 39,670.38 56,740.58 431Grant Fund - CIP Streets 6,106.38 2,181.56 8,287.94 611Liability/Risk Mgt 423.34 423.34 612Workers' Comp 496.01 496.01 621Office Stores Fund 1,443.00 452.95 1,895.95 622Information Technology 165.00 237.82 402.82 623Vehicle & Equipment Maint 87.50 3,019.05 3,106.55 624Building Maintenance 1,680.05 4,826.83 6,506.88 632IT Equipment Replacement 170.43 170.43 TOTAL 90,186.00 462,476.68 552,662.68 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: N/A FOLLOW UP ACTION: N/A ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Check Registers in the 'A/P Checks By Period and Year' report format SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:AGENDA ITEM: March 3, 2010 DEPARTMENT:CITY MANAGER: Public WorksDave Anderson PREPARED BY:DIRECTOR: Iveta HarvancikJohn Cherbone Senior Engineer SUBJECT:ProspectRoad Median No. 11–Notice of Completion RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to accept the Prospect Road Median No. 11 project as complete and authorize the City manager to sign the Notice of Completion for the construction contract. REPORT SUMMARY: All work on the Prospect Road Median No. 11has been completed by the City’s contractor, Blossom Valley Construction, Inc. of San Jose to the satisfaction of the City inspectors.The scope of work consisted of supplying all labor, equipment and materials to construct a raised landscaped median on Prospect Road between Titus Avenue and Provincetown Drive. Overall, the quality of construction completed through this contract was very favorableand the project was completed on time and within budget. Itis therefore recommended that the Council accept the project as complete and authorize the City Manager to sign the Notice of Completion. FISCAL IMPACTS: The project was funded by approved CIP funds. CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION: The project would not be accepted as complete and staff would notify the contractor of any additional work required by the City Council before the project would be accepted as complete. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: None in addition to the above. Page 1of 2 FOLLOW UP ACTION: Staff will record the Notice of Completion for the construction contract. ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT: Nothing additional. ATTACHMENTS: Notice of Completion. Page 2of 2 Recording requested by, And to be returned to: City of Saratoga Attn. City Clerk 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the work agreed and performed under the contract mentioned below between the Cityof Saratoga, a municipal corporation, whose address is 13777 Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga, CA 95070, as Owner of property or property rights, and the Contractor mentioned below, on property of the Owner, is accepted as complete by the Owner on or around the 22ndday of February, 2010. Contract Number: N/A Contract Date: August10, 2009 Contractor’s Name: Blossom Valley Construction, Inc. Contractor’s Address: P.O. Box 611537, San Jose, CA 95161 Description of Work: Prospect Road Median No. 11 Notice is given in accordance with the provisions of Section 3093 of the Civil Code of the State of California. The undersigned certifies that he is an officer of the City of Saratoga, that he has read the foregoing Notice of Acceptance of Completion and knows the contents thereof; and that the same is true of his own knowledge, except as to those matters which are therein stated on the information or belief, as to those matters the he believes to be true. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at the City of Saratoga, County of Santa Clara, State of California on______________, 2010. CITY OF SARATOGA BY:____________________________ATTEST:____________________________ Dave AndersonAnn Sullivan, City Clerk City ManagerGov. Code 40814 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:AGENDA ITEM: March 3, 2010 DEPARTMENT:CITY MANAGER: Public WorksDave Anderson PREPARED BY:DIRECTOR: John CherboneJohn Cherbone Public Works Director Joint Use Agreements with Santa Clara Valley Water District for Joe’s Trail SUBJECT: RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize the City Manager to execute following agreements with Santa Clara Valley Water District a Joint Use Agreement for Joe’s Trail. REPORT SUMMARY: In order to build a portion of Joe’s Trail near Saratoga Avenue it is necessary to obtain permission from the Santa Clara Valley Water District (District) because the trail crosses their fee title property at this location. The attached Joint Use Agreement will give the City the rights to build the trail across District property. FISCAL IMPACTS: None in addition to the adopted budget. CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): The Joint Use Agreement would not be executed and the City would not be permitted to build Joes Trail at this location. ALTERNATIVE ACTION (S): N/A FOLLOW UP ACTION(S): City Clerk will forward executed agreements to Santa Clara Valley Water District. Page 1of 2 ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1.Joint Use Agreement for Joe’s Trail. Page 2of 2 öÓÐ×ùÓÈÃÍÖéÛÊÛÈÍÕÛ äöÓÐ× JOINT USE AGREEMENT FOR A PUBLIC TRAIL AT SARATOGA SUNNYVALE ROAD éÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÛùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛéÌ×ÙÓÛÐøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÔ×Ê×ÓÎÛÖÈ×ÊÊ×Ö×ÊÊ×ØÈÍÛÉ©øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ¨ ÛÎØÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖéÛÊÛÈÍÕÛÛÏÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×éÈÛÈ×ÍÖùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÔ×Ê×ÓÎÛÖÈ×ÊÊ×Ö×ÊÊ×ØÈÍÛÉ ©ùÓÈÃ¨ÛÕÊ××ÈÔÓÉÝÝÝÝÝÝØÛÃÍÖ ©ûÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈ÷ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÆ×øÛÈ×¨ÛÉÖÍÐÐÍÅÉ Background. ûåÔ×Ê×ÛÉøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÓÉÈÔ×ÍÅÎ×ÊÍÖÙ×ÊÈÛÓÎÊ×ÛÐÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÔ×Ê×ÓÎÛÖÈ×ÊÈÔ×©ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×É¨Ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×Ø ÍÎ©÷ÄÔÓÚÓÈû¨Ô×Ê×ÈÍÉÍÏÛÊÑ×ØÛÎØÚÃÈÔÓÉÊ×Ö×Ê×ÎÙ×ÏÛØ×ÛÌÛÊÈÔ×Ê×ÍÖèÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈªÉ ÇÎØ×ÊÕÊÍÇÎØÈÊ×ÛÈ×ØÅÛÈ×ÊÌÓÌ×ÐÓÎ×ÑÎÍÅÎÛÉå×ÉÈìÓÌ×ÐÓÎ×ÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×É úåÔ×Ê×ÛÉùÓÈÃØ×ÉÓÊ×ÉÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÓÎÛÏÛÎÎ×ÊÈÔÛÈØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÓÎÈ×ÊÖ×Ê× ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈªÉÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÍÎÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ ÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÅÛÈ×ÊÌÓÌ×ÐÓÎ×ÍÊÛÎÃÍÈÔ×ÊÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÍÊÖÇÈÇÊ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ùåÔ×Ê×ÛÉùÓÈÃÔÛÉÛÉÙ×ÊÈÛÓÎ×ØÈÔÛÈÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÖÇÎØÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ØÈÍÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÛÎØ ÍÌ×ÊÛÈ×ÛÌÇÚÐÓÙÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØÓÎÙÓØ×ÎÈÉÈÔ×Ê×ÈÍÍÎÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÛÎØÈÔÛÈÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÖÇÎØÉÔÛÆ× Ú××ÎÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ØÈÍÏ××ÈÛÐÐÍÖÓÈÉÍÚÐÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÉÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÓÎÈÔÓÉÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈ øåÔ×Ê×ÛÉÈÔ×ÌÛÊÈÓ×ÉÖÓÎØÓÈÈÍÚ×ÓÎÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÓÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÖÍÊÒÍÓÎÈÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×É ÚÃÏ×ÛÎÉÍÖÈÔÓÉÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÌÇÊÉÇÛÎÈÈÍÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÈ×ÊÏÉÛÎØÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØ Now, therefore, the Parties agree as follows: øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÔ×Ê×ÚÃÕÊÛÎÈÉÌ×ÊÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÈÍùÓÈÃÈÍÇÉ×ÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÖÍÊÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÛÎØ ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÐÓÏÓÈÛÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÇÉ× Purpose íÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÌÇÚÐÓÙÇÉ×ÍÖÛÚÓÙÃÙÐ×ÛÎØ ÍÊÌ×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÈÊÛÓÐÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÊÛÓÐ Ê×ÐÛÈ×ØÓÎÙÓØ×ÎÈÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÉÓÕÎÉÖ×ÎÙÓÎÕÛÎØÕÛÈ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÖÓÊÉÈÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÚÃÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ ÛÉ×ÆÓØ×ÎÙ×ØÚÃÓÉÉÇÛÎÙ×ÍÖÛøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÌ×ÊÏÓÈ Limitations of Use ìÇÚÐÓÙÛÙÙ×ÉÉÍÎÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÏÇÉÈÍÎÐÃÚ×ÌÛÉÉÓÆ×ÓÎÎÛÈÇÊ×ô×ÎÙ× ÌÓÙÎÓÙÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÚÛÊÚ×ËÇ×ÉÖÓÊ×ÉØÍÕÉÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊØÍÏ×ÉÈÓÙÛÎÓÏÛÐÉ×ÄÙ×ÌÈÍÎÐ×ÛÉÔ ×ËÇ×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÇÉ×ÛÎØÛÎÃÈÃÌ×ÍÖÏÍÈÍÊÓÂ×ØÙÃÙÐ×ÉÛÊ×ÎÍÈÌ×ÊÏÓÈÈ×ØÍÎÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÛÎØ ùÓÈÃÏÇÉÈ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÉÇÙÔÇÉ×ÉØÍÎÍÈÍÙÙÇÊÍÎÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×É ùÓÈÃÅÓÐÐÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÖÍÊÈÊÛÉÔÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÎÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÈÔÛÈÓÉÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐÃÐÓÑ×ÐÃÈÍÔÛÆ×Ú××Î Õ×Î×ÊÛÈ×ØÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙªÉÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÊ×ÛÉùÓÈÃÅÓÐÐÚ× Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÐ×ÖÍÊÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÓÎÕÛÎØ×ÏÌÈÃÓÎÕÈÊÛÉÔÊ×Ù×ÌÈÛÙÐ×ÉÛÎØÊÇÚÚÓÉÔÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÛÉ Ê×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐÃÎ×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃùÓÈÃÅÓÐÐÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÕÊÛÖÖÓÈÓÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÓÎÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔùÓÈÃªÉÕÊÛÖÖÓÈÓ ÛÚÛÈ×Ï×ÎÈÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÕÊÛÖÖÓÈÓÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÖÊÍÏÉÓÕÎÉÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÓÎÙÍÎÒÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÛÎØ ÍÊ ÛÙÙ×ÉÉÍÊÃÈÍÈÔ××ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔÏ×ÎÈÍÖÛÌÇÚÐÓÙÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÓÈÉÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÉÛÏ× ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÛÈÙÍÏÌÛÊÛÚÐ×ùÓÈÃÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É èÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÈÊÛÓÐÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÍÊÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÏÇÉÈÚ×Ê×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐÃÌÛÈÊÍÐÐ×ØÚÃ ùÓÈÃÌ×ÊÉÍÎÎ×ÐÛÎØ ÍÊÊÛÎÕ×ÊÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉÇÎØ×ÊÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÅÓÈÔùÓÈÃÛÎØ ÍÊÆÍÐÇÎÈ××ÊÉÉÇÌ×ÊÆÓÉ×Ø ÚÃùÓÈÃøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÔÛÉÎÍÍÚÐÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÅÔÛÈÉÍ×Æ×ÊÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÍÊÌÛÃÖÍÊÛÎÃÉÇÙÔÌÛÈÊÍÐÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×É 15 ÍÖ ìÛÕ× óÖÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐÃÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÎÃùÓÈÃÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÍÎÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÚ×Ê×ÏÍÆ×ØÍÊ Ê×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÏÇÉÈØÍÉÍÛÈÓÈÉÍÅÎ×ÄÌ×ÎÉ×ÅÓÈÔÓÎ ØÛÃÉÍÖÊ×Ù×ÓÆÓÎÕÎÍÈÓÙ×ÖÊÍÏÈÔ× øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÅÓÐÐÓÎÖÍÊÏùÓÈÃÍÖÛÎÃÓÏÌ×ÎØÓÎÕÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÈÍ ×ÎÛÚÐ×ÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÈÍÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×ÈÔ×ÓÏÌÛÙÈÍÖÉÇÙÔÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃÍÎÈÔ×ùÓÈÃªÉÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÍÎ ÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×É÷ÄÙ×ÌÈÈÍÈÔ××ÄÈ×ÎÈÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÅÍÇÐØÓÎÈ×ÊÖ×Ê×ÅÓÈÔøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ùÓÈÃÏÛÃÛÈÓÈÉÍÅÎ×ÄÌ×ÎÉ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ùÓÈÃÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÇÌÍÎøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈªÉÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ× ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃÊ×ËÇÓÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÓÎÓÈÓÛÐÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÈÔÍÉ×ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ùÓÈÃÓÉÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÐ×ÖÍÊÊ×ÉÌÍÎØÓÎÕÈÍÛÐÐÌÇÚÐÓÙÙÍÏÌÐÛÓÎÈÉÛÎØÓÎËÇÓÊÓ×ÉÊ×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕùÓÈÃªÉ ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÍÎÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÈÊÛÓÐ ùÓÈÃÇÎØ×ÊÉÈÛÎØÉÈÔÛÈøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÏÛÃÔÛÆ×ÛÎ××ØÈÍ×ÎÕÛÕ×ÓÎÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÍÎÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÓÎÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÍÖÈÔ×å×ÉÈìÓÌ×ÐÓÎ×ÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÍÊÖÇÈÇÊ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉùÓÈÃÓÉÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÐ×ÖÍÊÈÔ×ÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÊ×ÌÛÓÊÍÖÓÈÉÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉÐÍÙÛÈ×Ø ÍÎÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÈÊÛÓÐóÎÎÍÎ×Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙÃÉÓÈÇÛÈÓÍÎÉùÓÈÃÛÎØøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÉÈÛÖÖ ÅÓÐÐÏ××ÈÅÔ×Î×Æ×ÊÎ×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÍÖÉÙÔ×ØÇÐÓÎÕÊÍÇÈÓÎ×ÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ ÚÇÈÎÍÈÐÓÏÓÈ×ØÈÍ ïÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÓÉÉÇ×ÉÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÈÍÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ï×ÈÔÍØÛÎØÈÓÏÓÎÕÍÖÓÉÉÇ×ÉÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÈÍÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×ØÅÓÐØÐÓÖ×ÛÎØ îÍÎ×Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙÃÅÍÊÑÊ×ËÇÓÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÇÉ×ÍÖÔ×ÛÆÃ×ËÇÓÌÏ×ÎÈÚÛÊÊÓÙÛØÓÎÕÛÎØ ÍÊ Ê×ÉÈÊÓÙÈÓÎÕÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×É îÍÈÅÓÈÔÉÈÛÎØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÖÍÊ×ÕÍÓÎÕÓÎÈÔ××Æ×ÎÈÍÖÛÎ×Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙÃÉÓÈÇÛÈÓÍÎÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÏÛÃ ×ÎÕÛÕ×ÓÎÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÍÎÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÅÓÈÔÍÇÈÖÓÊÉÈÏ××ÈÓÎÕÍÊ ÓÎÖÍÊÏÓÎÕÈÔ×ùÓÈÃ ûÎÃÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÊÏÛÒÍÊÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÅÍÊÑØÇÊÓÎÕÎ×ÉÈÓÎÕÉ×ÛÉÍÎÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÚ×ÈÅ××Î ÉÈÈÔ ö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃÛÎØòÇÐÃÅÓÐÐÚ×ÛÆÍÓØ×ØÅÔ×Î×Æ×ÊÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×óÖÛÎÃÉÇÙÔÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÊ ÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÅÍÊÑÏÇÉÈÚ×ØÍÎ×ØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×Î×ÉÈÓÎÕÉ×ÛÉÍÎÛÌÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÇÊÆ×ÃÚÃÛ ËÇÛÐÓÖÓ×ØÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÏÇÉÈÚ×ÇÎØ×ÊÈÛÑ×ÎÈÍØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÈÔ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÙ×ÍÖÎ×ÉÈÓÎÕóÖÎ×ÉÈÓÎÕÓÉ Ê×ÌÍÊÈ×ØÈÔ×ÚÓÍÐÍÕÓÉÈÅÓÐÐÚ××ÄÌ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÈÔ×ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛØ×ËÇÛÈ× ÏÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×É÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÓÏÌÛÙÈÉÅÓÐÐÚ×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÛÐÐÅÍÊÑûÎÃÛÎØÛÐÐ ÅÍÊÑÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÈÍÈÔÓÉé×ÙÈÓÍÎÅÓÐÐÚ×ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÓÎÛÙÙÍÊØÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐÉÈÛÈ× ÛÎØÐÍÙÛÐ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÔ×ÛÐÈÔÛÎØÉÛÖ×ÈÃÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÚÇÈÎÍÈÐÓÏÓÈ×ØÈÍÈÔ×Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐ ïÓÕÊÛÈÍÊÃúÓÊØûÙÈÍÖùÐ×ÛÎåÛÈ×ÊûÙÈ÷ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×ØéÌ×ÙÓ×ÉûÙÈÈÔ×ùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛöÓÉÔ ÛÎØõÛÏ×ùÍØ×ÛÎØÈÔ×ìÍÊÈ×ÊùÍÐÍÕÎ×ûÙÈÛÎØÛÎÃÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉÈÔ×Ê×ÈÍ úÍÈÔÌÛÊÈÓ×ÉÛÕÊ××ÈÍÅÍÊÑÈÍÕ×ÈÔ×ÊÈÍÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÛÎØÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÉÓÕÎÛÕ×ÅÔÓÙÔÚ×Î×ÖÓÈÉÈÔ×ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÉ ÍÖ×ÛÙÔÌÛÊÈÃÉÇÙÔÛÉÅÛÊÎÓÎÕÉ×ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÉÓÕÎÛÕ×ÓÎÈ×ÊÌÊ×ÈÓÆ×ÉÓÕÎÉÛÎØÒÍÓÎÈÇÉ×ÉÅÔ×Î ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×èÔ×ø×ÌÇÈÃíÌ×ÊÛÈÓÎÕíÖÖÓÙ×ÊÖÍÊÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÛÎØÈÔ×øÓÊ×ÙÈÍÊÍÖìÇÚÐÓÙåÍÊÑÉÖÍÊ ÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÊÈÔ×ÓÊÊ×ÉÌ×ÙÈÓÆ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎ××ÉÅÓÐÐÏ××ÈÛÎØÙÍÎÖ×ÊÍÎÛÌ×ÊÓÍØÓÙÚÛÉÓÉÈÍÌÐÛÎÈÔ× ÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÉÓÕÎÛÕ×ÅÔÓÙÔÉ×ÊÆ×ÉÈÔ×Î××ØÉÍÖÚÍÈÔÌÛÊÈÓ×ÉûÐÐÉÓÕÎÉÌÐÛÙ×ØÍÎ ÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÚÃùÓÈÃ×ÄÙ×ÌÈ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÉÓÕÎÉÈÔÛÈÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÈÔ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÃ×ÕÌÛÊÑèÊÛÓÐÚÃÎÛÏ× ÏÇÉÈÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÛøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÐÍÕÍÓÎ×ËÇÛÐÉÓÂ×ÛÎØÉÃÏÏ×ÈÊÓÙÛÐÊ×ÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÔÓÌÈÍÍÈÔ×ÊÐÍÕÍÉ ÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÍÎÉÇÙÔÉÓÕÎÉóÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎ×ÛÙÔÌÛÊÈÃÓÉÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÐ×ÖÍÊÈÔ×ÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÛÎØ ÇÌÑ××ÌÍÖÈÔ×ÉÓÕÎÛÕ×ÓÈÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÍÎÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×É èÔ×È×ÊÏÍÖÈÔÓÉÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÊÓÕÔÈÉÛÎØÍÚÐÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÉÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÈÔ×Ê×ÓÎÓÉÈÅ×ÎÈÃ ÖÓÆ× ÷ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÆ×øÛÈ×èÔ×ùÓÈÃÇÌÍÎÌÊÍÆÓØÓÎÕÈÔ× øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÅÓÈÔÎÍÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎ ØÛÃÉÅÊÓÈÈ×ÎÎÍÈÓÙ×ÚÇÈÎÍÏÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎ ØÛÃÉÎÍÈÓÙ×ÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÈÔ× ×ÄÌÓÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÓÎÓÈÓÛÐ Ã×ÛÊÈ×ÊÏÏÛÃÊ×Î×ÅÈÔÓÉûÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÖÍÊÛÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ Ã×ÛÊ Ì×ÊÓÍØûÌÛÊÈÃÏÛÃÈ×ÊÏÓÎÛÈ×ÈÔÓÉÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈ©ÖÍÊÙÛÇÉ×¨ÛÖÈ×ÊÌÊÍÆÓØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÍÈÔ×ÊÌÛÊÈÃÅÓÈÔÛÈ Ð×ÛÉÈ ØÛÃÉÅÊÓÈÈ×ÎÎÍÈÓÙ×ÍÖÉÇÙÔ©ÙÛÇÉ×¨ÛÎØÓÈÉÓÎÈ×ÎÈÈÍÈ×ÊÏÓÎÛÈ×ÈÔÓÉÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈöÍÊ 25 ÍÖ ìÛÕ× ùÓÈÃÅÓÐÐÔÛÆ×ÈÔ×ÖÇÐÐÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÛÎØÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÈÃÖÍÊÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÉÍÖÈÔÓÉÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÍÆ×ÊÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙªÉ ÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÛÎØùÓÈÃÏÛÃÊ×ÉÈÊÓÙÈÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈ×ÛÎØÉÇÌ×ÊÆÓÉ×ÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÇÉ× ÍÖÈÔ×ùÓÈÃªÉÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉùÓÈÃÏÛÃÓÎÓÈÉØÓÉÙÊ×ÈÓÍÎÚÇÈÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÊÓÕÔÈÍÖøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ Ô×Ê×ÓÎÛÖÈ×ÊØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ØÛÎØÅÓÈÔÍÇÈØÓÏÓÎÇÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÅÛÈ×ÊÉÇÌÌÐÃÍÊÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÍÊ ÔÛÂÛÊØÈÔ×Ê×ÈÍÍÖÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÛÉÎÍÅ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÍÊÛÉÏÛÃÔ×Ê×ÛÖÈ×ÊÚ×ÛÐÈ×Ê×ØÈÛÑ×ÛÎÃ Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÍÖ×Æ×ÊÃÑÓÎØÛÉÏÛÃÓÎÈÔ×ÍÌÓÎÓÍÎÍÖùÓÈÃÚ×Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÖÍÊÈÔ×ÉÛÖ×ÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ× ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÚÃÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙöÇÊÈÔ×ÊùÓÈÃÓÉÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÐ×ÖÍÊÈÔ×ÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÓÎÇÉÛÚÐ×ÛÎØÉÛÖ× ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÍÖ×Æ×ÊÃÈÔ×ÈÊÛÓÐÛÎØ×Æ×ÊÃÍÈÔ×ÊùÓÈÃÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÍÎÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×É ùÓÈÃÇÎØ×ÊÉÈÛÎØÉÈÔÛÈøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÏÇÉÈÔÛÆ×ÛÚÉÍÐÇÈ×ÖÊ××ÛÎØÇÎÓÏÌ×Ø×ØÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÈÔ× ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÈÍÙÛÊÊÃÍÇÈÓÈÉÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÅÓÈÔÍÇÈÐÓÏÓÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÓÎÕÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÎÕÊ×ÌÐÛÙÓÎÕÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÎÕÊ×ÌÛÓÊÓÎÕÛÙÙ×ÉÉÓÎÕÛÎØÓÎÉÌ×ÙÈÓÎÕÈÔ× å×ÉÈìÓÌ×ÐÓÎ×ÍÊÛÎÃÖÇÈÇÊ×ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÚÃÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈùÓÈÃÅÓÐÐÚ×ÛÊÈÔ×ÙÍÉÈÛÎØ ×ÄÌ×ÎÉ×ÍÖÛÎÃÉ×ÙÇÊÓÈÃÌÍÐÓÙ×ÍÊÍÈÔ×Ê×ÄÌ×ÎØÓÈÇÊ×ÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÈÍÈ×ÏÌÍÊÛÊÓÐÃ ÌÊÍÔÓÚÓÈÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÈÔÛÈÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÍÊØÓÎÛÊÓÐÃÓÎÙÇÊÈÍ ÙÛÊÊÃÍÇÈÓÈÉÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÛÎØÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÍÎÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉøÛÏÛÕ×ÈÍÛÎÃøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÛÊÓÉÓÎÕÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ùÓÈÃªÉÍÊìÇÚÐÓÙªÉÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÓÉÈÔ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÓÐÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ× ùÓÈÃ èÔ×ùÓÈÃÏÛÃÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÛÎÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÍÎÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÍÎÐÃÓÖÛÐÐÍÖÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉ ÛÊ×ÉÛÈÓÉÖÓ×ØÓøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÉÈÔÛÈÉÇÙÔÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÇÎÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ×ÓÎÈ×ÊÖ×Ê× ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈªÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÍÊÖÇÈÇÊ×ÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ×ÛÎØ ÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×å×ÉÈìÓÌ×ÐÓÎ×ÓÓÉÇÙÔÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÉÌÊÓÍÊÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÚÃÛÎØÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐ ÍÖÈÔ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÛÉ×ÆÓØ×ÎÙ×ØÚÃÓÉÉÇÛÎÙ×ÍÖÛøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÌ×ÊÏÓÈÛÎØÓÓÓÉÇÙÔÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÈÔ×Ê×ÍÖÓÉÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÈÅÓÈÔÛÐÐÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ×Ð×ÕÛÐÛÎØÌ×ÊÏÓÈÈÓÎÕ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐëÇÛÐÓÈÃûÙÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ùÓÈÃÛÕÊ××ÉÈÍÛÉÉÇÏ×ÈÔ×Ø×Ö×ÎÉ×ÍÖÓÎØ×ÏÎÓÖÃÛÎØÔÍÐØÔÛÊÏÐ×ÉÉøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÓÈÉÍÖÖÓÙ×ÊÉ ÛÕ×ÎÈÉÛÎØ×ÏÌÐÍÃ××ÉÖÊÍÏÛÐÐÙÐÛÓÏÉÐÓÛÚÓÐÓÈÃÐÍÉÉØÛÏÛÕ×ÛÎØÓÎÒÇÊÃÍÖÛÎÃÑÓÎØÎÛÈÇÊ× ÍÊØ×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃÍÊÓÎØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃÛÊÓÉÓÎÕØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÓÎÓÈÓÛÐÈ×ÊÏÍÖÈÔÓÉÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÍÊÛÎÃ Ê×Î×ÅÛÐÈÔ×Ê×ÍÖÈÔÛÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÓùÓÈÃªÉÛÎØ ÍÊÌÇÚÐÓÙªÉÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÍÊ ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ×ìÊ×ÏÓÉ×ÉÍÊÓÓÖÊÍÏÛÙÈÉÍÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÍÊÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÍÖùÓÈÃªÉÍÖÖÓÙ×ÊÉ ÛÕ×ÎÈÉ×ÏÌÐÍÃ××ÉÍÊÓÎØ×Ì×ÎØ×ÎÈÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÉ×ÏÌÐÍÃ×ØÚÃùÓÈÃ×ÄÙ×ÌÈÓÎÕÙÐÛÓÏÉÐÓÛÚÓÐÓÈÃ ÐÍÉÉØÛÏÛÕ×ÍÊÓÎÒÇÊÃÛÊÓÉÓÎÕÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÅÓÐÐÖÇÐÍÊÎ×ÕÐÓÕ×ÎÈÛÙÈÉÍÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÍÊÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÍÖÛÎ ÍÖÖÓÙ×ÊÛÕ×ÎÈÍÊ×ÏÌÐÍÃ××ÍÖøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ ûÎÃÛÎØÛÐÐÎÍÈÓÙ×ÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÈÍÚ×ÕÓÆ×ÎÔ×Ê×ÇÎØ×ÊÅÓÐÐÚ×Ø××Ï×ØÈÍÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎØ×ÐÓÆ×Ê×Ø ÇÌÍÎØ×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÎÈÔ×çÎÓÈ×ØéÈÛÈ×ÉÏÛÓÐÌÍÉÈÛÕ×ÌÊ×ÌÛÓØÛØØÊ×ÉÉ×ØÈÍ×ÓÈÔ×ÊÍÖÈÔ×ÌÛÊÈÓ×ÉÛÈ ÈÔ×ÛØØÊ×ÉÉÔ×Ê×ÓÎÛÖÈ×ÊÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓ×ØÍÊÛÉÐÛÈ×ÊÛÏ×ÎØ×ØÚÃ×ÓÈÔ×ÊÌÛÊÈÃÓÎÅÊÓÈÓÎÕ ùÓÈÃÍÖéÛÊÛÈÍÕÛéÛÎÈÛùÐÛÊÛæÛÐÐ×ÃåÛÈ×ÊøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ öÊÇÓÈÆÛÐ×ûÆ×ÎÇ× ûÐÏÛØ×Î÷ÄÌÊ×ÉÉÅÛÃ éÛÊÛÈÍÕÛùû éÛÎòÍÉ×ùû ûÈÈ×ÎÈÓÍÎùÓÈÃùÐ×ÊÑûÈÈ×ÎÈÓÍÎùÐ×ÊÑÍÖÈÔ×úÍÛÊØ 35 ÍÖ ìÛÕ× èÔÓÉÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÛÎØÛÐÐÈ×ÊÏÉÙÍÆ×ÎÛÎÈÉÛÎØÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÔ×Ê×ÍÖÅÓÐÐÛÌÌÐÃÈÍÛÎØÚÓÎØÈÔ× ÉÇÙÙ×ÉÉÍÊÉÛÎØÛÉÉÓÕÎÉÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÉÌ×ÙÈÓÆ×ÌÛÊÈÓ×ÉÔ×Ê×ÈÍùÓÈÃÅÓÐÐÎ×ÓÈÔ×ÊÛÉÉÓÕÎÎÍÊÉÇÚÐ×È ÈÔÓÉÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÍÇÈÈÔ×ÌÊÓÍÊÅÊÓÈÈ×ÎÙÍÎÉ×ÎÈÍÖøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ èÔÓÉÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÓÉÕÍÆ×ÊÎ×ØÚÃùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÐÛÅ èÔÓÉÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÏÛÃÎÍÈÚ×ÏÍØÓÖÓ×ØÍÊÛÏ×ÎØ×Ø×ÄÙ×ÌÈÓÎÅÊÓÈÓÎÕÉÓÕÎ×ØÚÃÚÍÈÔÌÛÊÈÓ×É óÈÓÉ×ÄÌÊ×ÉÉÐÃÇÎØ×ÊÉÈÍÍØÈÔÛÈÈÔÓÉÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÓÎÛÎÃÅÛÃÅÔÛÈÉÍ×Æ×ÊÕÊÛÎÈÍÊ ÙÍÎÆ×ÃÛÎÃÌ×ÊÏÛÎ×ÎÈ×ÛÉ×Ï×ÎÈÖ××ÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÓÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈÓÎÛÌÛÊÈÃªÉÊ×ÛÐÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÈÍÈÔ×ùÓÈÃ óÎÈÔ××Æ×ÎÈÍÖÛØÓÉÌÇÈ×Ú×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×ÌÛÊÈÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÊ×ÉÌ×ÙÈÈÍÈÔ×È×ÊÏÉÍÊÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔÓÉ ÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÈÔ×ÌÊ×ÆÛÓÐÓÎÕÌÛÊÈÃÓÉ×ÎÈÓÈÐ×ØÈÍÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÍÈÔ×ÊÓÈÉÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ×ÛÈÈÍÊÎ×ÃÉª Ö××ÉÛÉ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÒÇØÕ×ÍÊÛÊÚÓÈÊÛÈÍÊÌÊ×ÉÓØÓÎÕÍÆ×ÊÉÇÙÔØÓÉÌÇÈ× èÔÓÉÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÈÍÕ×ÈÔ×ÊÅÓÈÔÛÐÐ×ÄÔÓÚÓÈÉÛÈÈÛÙÔ×ØÔ×Ê×ÈÍÙÍÎÉÈÓÈÇÈ×ÉÈÔ××ÎÈÓÊ×ÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈ Ú×ÈÅ××ÎÈÔ×ÌÛÊÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÉÇÌ×ÊÉ×Ø×ÉÛÐÐÌÊÓÍÊÅÊÓÈÈ×ÎÍÊÍÊÛÐÇÎØ×ÊÉÈÛÎØÓÎÕÉ WITNESS THE EXECUTION HEREOF ÍÎÈÔ×ûÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈ÷ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÆ×øÛÈ× ùóèãíöéûêûèíõûÛÏÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐéûîèûùðûêûæûðð÷ãåûè÷êøóéèêóùè ÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×éÈÛÈ×ÍÖùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛÛùÛÐÓÖÍÊÎÓÛéÌ×ÙÓÛÐøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ úÃÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝúÃÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ øÛÆ×ûÎØ×ÊÉÍÎú×ÛÇõÍÐØÓ× ùÓÈÃïÛÎÛÕ×ÊùÔÓ×Ö÷Ä×ÙÇÈÓÆ×íÖÖÓÙ×Ê ûèè÷éèûèè÷éè ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÎÎéÇÐÐÓÆÛÎïÓÙÔ×ÐÐ×ñÓÎÕ ùÓÈÃùÐ×ÊÑùÐ×ÊÑ úÍÛÊØÍÖøÓÊ×ÙÈÍÊÉ ûììêíæ÷øûéèíöíêïûììêíæ÷øûéèíöíêï ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ êÓÙÔÛÊØèÛÃÐÍÊûÎÈÔÍÎÃöÇÐÙÔ×Ê ùÓÈÃûÈÈÍÊÎ×ÃûÉÉÓÉÈÛÎÈøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈùÍÇÎÉ×Ð 45 ÍÖ ìÛÕ× SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:AGENDA ITEM: March 3, 2010 DEPARTMENT:CITY MANAGER: Public WorksDave Anderson PREPARED BY:DIRECTOR: John CherboneJohn Cherbone Landscaping & Lighting Assessment District LLA-1; Resolutions initiating renewal SUBJECT: of the District for FY 10-11. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1.Move to adopt the Resolution describing improvements and directing preparation of the Engineer’s Report. 2.Move to adopt the Resolution appointing the Attorney’s for the District. . REPORT SUMMARY: Attached are two Resolutions the City Council must adopt to initiate the annual process of renewing the Landscaping & Lighting Assessment District LLA-1 for the upcoming fiscal year beginning on July 1. A brief summary of each Resolution is as follows: Resolution describing improvements and directing preparation of the Engineer’s 1. Report - This is the Resolution required under Streets & Highways Code Section 22622 to initiate the annualrenewal process for the existing assessment district for the ensuing fiscal year. The Resolution references the proposed improvements to be provided by the district (Exhibit A), and directs the preparation of the Engineer’s Report required under S&H Code Section 22565. Resolution appointing Attorneys - 2.This Resolution appoints the City Attorney’s office as the attorneys for the District throughout the renewal process, and limits their fees in connection with this work to $500. The provisions of SB 919 (The Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act) adopted by the State legislature in 1997, (Chapter 38, Stats. 1997), and which became effective on July 1, 1997, will be implemented during the renewal process if necessary. Procedurally this means that assessment ballots will be mailed to those property owners within the District whose initial proposed assessments are either 1) higher than in any previous year and Page 1of 3 who have not previously voted on their assessments, or 2) higher than what was authorized via balloting conducted in a previous year. As in previous years, ballots will be separately tabulated at the close of the Protest Hearing for each Zone that may be voting. Only those ballots returned by the close of the Protest Hearing will count towards determining whether a majority protest exists. The following sets forth the tentative schedule for renewing the District for FY 10-11: March 3 -Council adopts Resolutions directing preparation of Engineer’s Report and appointing Attorneys. April 21-Council receives Engineer’s Report. Council adopts Resolution of Intention preliminarily approving Engineer’s Report and assessments and setting date and time for Protest Hearing. April 30 -Notices with Proposition 218 ballots mailed to property owners, if required. May 5 -Notice of Protest Hearing published in Saratoga News. May 19 -Notice of Protest Hearing published in Saratoga News. June 2 -Council conducts Protest Hearing per Gov’t. Code Sec. 53753. Ballots are tabulated at the close of the Hearing. If appropriate, Council adopts Resolution confirming assessments for FY 10-11. June 16 -Backup date if needed. August 10 -Deadline for Engineer to transmit Assessment Roll to County Auditor. FISCAL IMPACTS: The costs associated with administering the Landscaping & Lighting Assessment District are recovered via the assessments levied against the properties, which receive special benefit from the services provided through the District. A detailed analysis of the proposed financing for the District in FY 10-11 will be provided in the Engineer’s Report. CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): One or both of the Resolutions would not be adopted. This would delay initiating the process to renew the District for FY 10-11. ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S): Page 2of 3 None in addition to the above. FOLLOW UP ACTION(S): Work on the Engineer’s Report will begin. ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT: Nothing additional at this time. Eventually, notices and ballots will be mailed to certain property owners as required by law. Additionally, notices will be published in the Saratoga News as required. ATTACHMENTS: 1.Resolution describing improvements and directing preparation of theEngineer’s Report. 2.Resolution appointing Attorneys. Page 3of 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION DESCRIBING IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LLA-1 RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Saratoga, California, as follows: 1.The City Council did, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, conduct proceedings for the formationof the City of Saratoga Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District LLA-1 and for the levy and collection of assessments for fiscal year 1980 - 1981, and did, on June 18, 1980, pursuant to proceedings duly had, adopt its Resolution No. 950- D, a Resolution Overruling Protests and Ordering the Formation of an Assessment District and the Improvements and Confirming the Diagram and Assessments; 2.The public interest, convenience and necessity require, and it is the intention of said Council to undertake proceedings for the levy and collection of assessments upon the several lots or parcels of land in said District, for the construction or installation of improvements, including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, for the fiscal year 2010-2011. 3.The improvements to be constructed or installed, including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" hereto attached and by reference incorporated herein. 4.The costs and expenses of said improvements, including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, are to be made chargeable upon said District, the exterior boundaries of which District are the composite and consolidated area as more particularly shown on a map thereof on file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Saratoga to which reference is hereby made for further particulars. Said map indicates by a boundary line the extent of the territory included in said District and of any zone thereof and shall govern for all details as to the extent of the assessment district. 5.The Engineer of said City be, and is hereby, directed to prepare and file with said Clerk a report, in writing, referring to the assessment district by its distinctive designation, specifying the fiscal year to which the report applies, and, with respect to that year, presenting the following: 1 a)plans and specification of the existing improvements and for proposed new improvements, if any, to be made within the assessment district or within any zone thereof; b)an estimate of the costs of said proposed new improvements, if any, to be made, the costs of maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, and of any existing improvements, together with the incidental expenses in connection therewith; c)a diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the assessment district and of any zones within said district and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the district as such lot or parcel of land is shown on the County Assessor's map for the fiscal year to which the report applies, each of which lots or parcels of land shall be identified by a distinctive number or letter on said diagram; and d)a proposed assessment of the total amount of the estimated costs and expenses of the proposed new improvements, including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, and of any existing improvements upon the several lots or parcels of land in said district in proportion to the estimated particular and distinct benefits to be received by each of such lots or parcels of land, respectively, from said improvements, including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, and of the expenses incidental thereto. 6.The Office of the Public Works Director of said City be, and is hereby, designated as the office to answer inquiries regarding any protest proceedings to be had herein, and may be contacted during regular office hours at the City Hall, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, California 95070 or by calling (408) 868-1241. * * * * * * * * The above and foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at an adjourned meeting of the Saratoga City Council held on the __ day of ________, 2010by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ______________________________ Kathleen King, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ Ann Sullivan, City Clerk 2 Exhibit A DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS The design, construction or installation, including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof, of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass or other ornamental vegetation, statuary, fountains and other ornamental structures and facilities, and public lighting facilities for the lighting of any public places, including traffic signals, ornamental standards, luminaries, poles, supports, tunnels, manholes, vaults, conduits, pipes, wires, conductors, guys, stubs, platforms, braces, transformers, insulators, contacts, switches, capacitors, meters, communication circuits, appliances, attachments and appurtenances, including the cost of repair, removal or replacement of all or any part thereof, providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; electric current or energy, gas or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements; and the operation of any fountains or the maintenance of any other improvements. 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPOINTING ATTORNEYS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LLA-1 RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Saratoga, California, that WHEREAS, the City Council has determined to undertake proceedings for the levy and collection of assessments upon the parcels of land in the City of Saratoga Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District LLA-1 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 for the construction or installation of improvements, including the maintenance or servicing, or both, thereof for the fiscal year 2010-2011; and WHEREAS, the public interest and general welfare will be served by appointing and employing attorneys for thepreparation and conduct of said proceedings; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, as follows: 1.That the law firm of Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger be, and it is hereby appointed and employed to do and perform all legal services required in the conduct of said proceedings, and that its compensation be, and it hereby is fixed at not to exceed $500.00. * * * * * * * The above and foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at an adjourned meeting of the Saratoga City Council held on the __ day of ________, 2010by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ______________________________ Kathleen King, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ Ann Sullivan, City Clerk SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: March 3, 2010 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER: Community DevelopmentDave Anderson PREPARED BY:DIRECTOR: Cynthia McCormick, AssistantPlanner, AICPJohn Livingstone, AICP SUBJECT:FY 2010/11COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND COMMUNITY GRANT FUNDINGAPPLICATIONS RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1.Conduct the Public Hearingand accept public testimony presentations from applicants. 2.Review recommendations for streamlining the County CDBG program. th 3.Continue the Public Hearing to March 17to finalize grant allocations and approve a transfer of $13,964 in previously allocated CDBG funds. REPORT SUMMARY: Each year the City allocates Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Community Grant funding to community services and programs.Saratoga’s Community Grant funding helpsprograms that benefit Saratoga residents whether or not they meet CDBG income requirements.CDBG proposals must comply with federal and county requirements with priority given to projects that provide affordable housing, rehabilitation of affordable housing, and public services which primarily serve lower income clients. CDBG funding has also been available for public improvementsto ensure compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The availability of 2010-2011 fiscal year CDBGfunds was publicized on the City Website and in the Saratoga News. CDBG ADA and CDBG Administration Staff received oneapplication from the Public Works Department for $79,900which is the total amount available for ADA projects.As in past years, the CDBG program also includes $15,000 for City administration ofthe CDBG program and $13,000 for County administration ofthe SHARP program. CDBGPublic Services and Community Services Prior to the writing of this staff report, staff received six (6) applications for community services, three of which are eligible for CDBG Public Service funding.The total amount of fundingrequested this year for CDBG Public Services and SaratogaCommunity Services is $74,712. The City expectsto receive approximately $26,500 for CDBG public service projects.Council policy is to match CDBG public 1 service fundsfor Community Grants. Thus, the total amount available for public service and community service programs would be approximately $53,000 and the total funding shortfall is$21,712. 1 NOTE: The final CDBG funding amount has not been confirmed but is expected to be announced prior to the beginning of FY 10/11 (July 1, 2010). The public service fund cap is formula based and subject to change. DISCUSSION: CDBG ADA Public Improvement Funding This City expects to receive $79,900 for affordable housing and/or ADA projects.The Public Works Department is requesting the full amount for Phase IV of the Accessible Signal Program.The Public Works Department is also requesting that $13,964 in previously allocated funds be transferred to the HistoricalMuseum ADA ramp project. This includes $4,464from the City Hall Public Bathroom ADA project which cannot be completed due to the current building configuration. An additional $9,500 would be transferred from the Accessible Signal Program in order to complete the Historical Museum ADA ramp project SHARP Funding At one time,the City managed CDBG funds for low-income housing rehabilitation projects. The SHARP program is now administered by the Santa Clara County Housing and Community Development $13,000 Department (HCD). HCD charges per year to administer the program. The cost covers processing loan applications and paperwork, determining eligibility, and coordinating payments to the contractors doing the repair work. CDBG Administrative Funding CDBG funds may be used to pay reasonable costs related to administration of the CDBG program. Administrativeactivities include preparing related reports, contracts and correspondence; managing the annual CDBG allocation disbursement process, monitoring the grantees, and acting as a liaison between the City and the Urban County Program. The maximum amount that may be allocated for City $15,000 administration of the CDBG program is . CDBGPublic Services Three applicationsare eligible for CDBG Public Service funding:Saratoga Area Senior Coordinating Council (SASCC) requested $37,000;West Valley Community Services(WVCS) requested $20,000; and Catholic Charities requested $5,000. All three agencies applied for and received full funding last year. For simplicity,the Council typically funds one program with CDBG funds while funding the other programs with Saratoga Community Grant funds.The total amount requested for these three $62,000.$26,500 applications is The total amount estimated for CDBG public service projects is . The $35,500. amount remaining to be carried over to the Community Grant funding program is Community Services The three applications that are not CDBG eligible include requests for $5,000 from the Mustard Faire, $4,212from the Wildlife Center of Silicon Valley, and $3,500 from the Shady Shakespeare Theater $12,712. Company. The total amount requested from these three applications isThe total amount $48,212. including the $35,500carried over from CDBG public services isCouncil policy is to match CDBG public service funds, which is estimated to be approximately $26,500. Thus, the total amount $21,712 available for community service programs is $53,000 and the total shortfallis. SUMMARY OF APPLICATIONS Summaries of each application are listed below. Applications are provided in Attachment 1. Additional information (e.g., audit, financial statements) are available upon request. 2011 Mustard Faire Representatives for the Mustard Faire submitted a proposal for its annual event that celebratesthe agricultural history of Saratoga with education on whatcanbe done to preserve it.The 2,600 Saratoga 93% residents that attend the Mustard Faire represent an estimated of the approximately 2,800 $5,00073.5% attendees.The totalcost of the program is $6,800.The requested funding is which is of the total cost of theprogram.This project is being consideredunder the Community Grant program. It is not eligible for CDBG funding since it does not primarily serve low-income participants. The program receives in-kind donations and volunteer work as leveraging. Shady Shakespeare Theater Company The Shady Shakespeare Theater Company (SSTC) submitted a proposal to help fund performances held in Sanborn-Skyline County Park.SSTC’s 2009 productions of Richard III and As You Like It were 350 attended by approximately 4,000 people (3,500 unduplicated)including approximately Saratoga 10% residents which represent an estimated of the total guests. The total cost of the program is $85,000. $3,5004.1% The requested funding is which is of the total cost of the program.This project is being consideredunder the CommunityGrant program. It is not eligible for CDBG funding since it does not primarily serve low-income participants. In addition to receiving $19,557 in grants, the program has requested $20,500 from 6organizations (including Saratoga). Wildlife Center of Silicon Valley The Wildlife Center of Silicon Valley(WCSV) submitted a proposal for wildlife rehabilitation and 100 release and wildlife education and outreach.Last year, Saratoga residents brought in approximately 2.5% animals for WCSV services. This represents of the approximately 4,000 injured, sick and orphaned local birds and mammalsbrought in annually.The total cost of the program is $279,216.The $4,2121.5% requested funding is which is of the total cost of theprogram.This does not include the cost associated with phone calls and emails from residents. WCSV historically responds to 175 to 200 approximately telephone and e-mail inquiriesfrom Saratoga residents each year. In addition, WCSV held two education presentations in the City of Saratogain 2009, which were attended by a total 65 of residents (representing approximately 3.6% of the education/outreach program). This project is being consideredunder the Community Grant program. It is not eligible for CDBG funding since it does not primarily serve low-income participants. Leveraging for the program includes grants, donations, and investments. CDBG Public ServiceEligible Projects Catholic Charities –Long Term Ombudsman Program Catholic Charities submitted a proposal for continued support of the Long Term Ombudsman Program which provides advocacy for the rights of residents in long term care. The program serves 10,293 2882.8% unduplicated clients annually including a minimum of Saratoga residents which represent of $5,000 the total clients served. The total cost of the program is $293,313.The requested funding is 1.7% which is of the total budget to operate the program. Catholic Charities has successfully leveraged funding through donations and funding at the federal andcity level. Catholic Charities continues to apply for CDBG funding from several other cities it serves. Thisprogram received grant funding from Saratoga for the last 2years.This program is eligible for both Community Grant and CDBG Public Service funding. SASCC -Adult Day Care Program Saratoga Area Senior Coordinating Council (SASCC) submitted its annual proposal for continued support of the SASCC Adult Day Care Center Program which provides respite care and social activities 21 for frail elders and their caregivers. The program serves 51 unduplicated clients annuallyincluding 41% Saratoga residents which represent of the total clients served. The total cost of the program is $37,00013.4% $275,931.The requested funding is which is of the total budget to operate the Adult Care Center. SASCC has successfully leveraged funding through donations and annual fundraising efforts in addition to sliding-scale fees. SASCC intends to apply for CDBG funding from the City of Campbell and the City of San Jose. This program has received CDBG funding from Saratoga for the past 9 years. This program is eligible for both Community Grantand CDBG Public Service funding. West Valley Community Services –Food Pantry and Emergency Rental/Utility Assistance West Valley Community Services (WVCS) submitted a proposal for continued support of its Community Assistance Program which provides food pantry and emergency rental/utility services. The 67 program serves 611 unduplicated clients annually including approximately Saratoga residents which 11% represent of the total clients served. The total cost of the program is $237,577. The requested $20,0008.4% funding is which is of the total budget to operate the program. WVCS has successfully leveraged funding through donations and funding at the federal, county andcity level. WVCS continues to apply for CDBG funding from several other cities it serves. This program has received grant funding from Saratoga for the past 3 years. Thisprogram is eligible for both Community Grant and CDBG Public Service funding. FUTURE CDBG ADMINISTRATION Santa Clara County administration of the CDBG program has not been immune to the economic crisis facing cities and counties. Given their budget deficit, Santa Clara County is looking at ways to 2 streamline administration ofthe Urban Countyprogram.The agency estimates thatthe CountyGeneral 3 Fund supplemented the HCDbudget in the amount of $633,000 this fiscal year.The County hasseveral recommendations,listed below,for FY 11/12 that are estimated to reduce overhead costs by $327,415. These recommendations are discussed in more detail in Attachment 3. 1.Establish a minimum amount of $5,000 for Public Service Grants. 2.Limit the maximum number of Public Service Grants for each city to five and consider shifting smaller city grants to non-CDBG funds. 3.Round all amounts to the nearest $100 at the time that agreements are finalized. 4.Shift all Public Service Contracts to a 2-year concurrent cycle. 5.Change payment requests from monthly to quarterly or semi-annually. 6.Share performance and fiscal monitoring responsibilities among Urban County jurisdictions. 7.Set city expenditure deadlines to two years to minimize roll-overs. 8.Reduce General Fund overhead charges to the HCD Program. 9.Seek proposals for a web-based data management system to unify and simplify administration of CDBG Program. 10.Increase administrative revenue to the County by reducing or eliminating the $15,000 administrative allowance allocated to each City. 11.Consider unifying all grants under County administration for CDBG Program Year 2012/13 if above efficiencies can significantly reduce administrative costs. 12.Consider further increasing the minimum amount and reducing the number of Public Service Grants for CDBG Program Year 2012/13. The City of Saratoga is currently complying with recommendations #1, 2, 3, and 12 by allocating all of its CDBG public service funds to one applicant and funding other applicants through the City’s general fund. Recommendations#4, 5, and 7 could easily be implemented. The attached letter from the County’ Office of Affordable Housingare only recommendations. The recommendations will be forwarded to ò the County Executive/City Managers Group for approvalStaff will continue to work with the County and report back to the Council as to the outcome of the above recommendations. 2 Cities with populations fewer than 50,000 arenot eligible to apply directly for CDBG funds. All such cities in Santa Clara County have combined to form an “Urban County” in order to apply for funding. 3 Santa Clara County Housing and Community Development FISCAL IMPACTS: The CDBG funds for FY 2010/11 are federal Housing and Urban Development funds administered by Santa Clara County and allocated to participating cities. Under the Community Grants program, Council policy is to match CDBG public service funds, which is estimated to be $26,500 this year. CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED ACTION: The City’s FY 2010/11 CDBG allocation will remain with the County. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: NA FOLLOW UP ACTION: th 1.Continue the Public Hearing to March 17to finalize grant allocations and approve a transfer of $13,964 in previously allocated CDBG funds. th 2.Following the March 17meeting, forward Council’s CDBG recommendations to the County of Santa Clara and execute contracts with agencies receiving funding. ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT: The availability of grant funds was publicized on the City Website and in the Saratoga News in January 2010. Notice of the Public Hearing was properly postedand published in the Saratoga News on February 16, 2010. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1–Applications Attachment 2–Grant Request Worksheet Attachment 3-Recommendations for streamlining the Urban County CDBG program FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION DATE: February 12, 2010 Application Instructions Sheet Please refer to the for details on the following questions. Please limit your answers to one paragraph per question 1) Applicant Organization/Agency Name: Mustard Faire Agency Address:P.O. Box 966, San Jose, CA 95108-0966 Executive Director:Norman Koepernik Phone:(408) 971-9636Fax:(408) 297-8270 E-Mail:Theresa_mustardfaire@yahoo.com Agency isaFaith Based Organization:____YesXNo 2) Program Title :2011MustardFaire Program Address:Historic Orchard (Fruitvale & Saratoga Avenues) Contact Person/Title:Norman Koepernik Phone:(408) 971-9636Fax:(408) 297-8270 E-Mail: Theresa_mustardfaire@yahoo.com 3) $5,000 City of Saratoga grant funds requested this year (FY10/11): 4) City of Saratogagrantfunds requestedin the past: None from the Community grant program; funding has been provided in the past through the annual budget process. City of Saratogagrantfunds receivedin the past: In fiscal year 2008-09 the City allocated $5,000; infiscal year 2009-10 the City allocated $3,000. 5) Programdescription and number of unduplicated clients served: TheMustard Faire is a celebration of Saratoga’s agricultural history,when orchards were plentiful, the valley was covered with blossoms and the grounds were blanketed in a glorious color of yellow mustard. Over time, orchards have givenway to housingand other development. However, the City has preserved a piece of the past in the historic orchard.Each year, the Mustard Faire provides a venue in which families and friends cancelebrate the agricultural history of Saratoga, and learn about what can be done to preserve it. The Mustard Faire draws between 2,700 and 3,000 attendees. 6) Programpurpose and objectives: Create awareness of local history Educate the public about the value of the historic orchard and preservation of agricultural heritage Host a family-friendly event that includes cultural, artistic and environmental awareness FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION 7) Programmanagement: The program is organized and managed by a group of community volunteers, assisted by City staff. 8) Agency description and experience: A core committee has been organizing and implementing this event for many years, is very familiar with City policies and procedures and has positive working relationships with City staff. 9) Audit information: The Mustard Faire has been a long-standing community event funded by the City of Saratoga. Budgeted expenses are paid via invoices submitted to the . City, which keeps an accounting of the costs incurred 10) Sources of funds anticipated for this project: In addition to the community grant funds requested, organizers annually contribute approximately $1,800 of their own funds to the event. 11) Budget: Pleaseuse the attached worksheet. 12)Performance Measurements: Pleaseuse the attached worksheet. 13) Outreach: The event is publicized through banners at Blaney Plaza, flyers distributed to schools, local businesses, the Chamber of Commerce and the City, posting on the City website,Artsopolisand the Mustard Faire website. 14) Leveraging: As noted above, event organizers contribute personal funds in order to pay for items not covered by City funds. In additional, numerous volunteers perform tasks to plan, organize and implement the Faire. West Valley Collection & Recycling will be supplying waste and recycling toters free of charge. The Fire District will be supplying anantique Saratoga Ford Model AA fire truck to participate at the Mustard Faire. Other community organizations, such as the Taiko Drummers and the Historical Foundation will also be supporting and participating in the Faire. 15) Cost / Benefit Analysis: Total Event Cost:$6,800 Total Anticipated Attendees2,800 Total Cost/Attendee:$ 2.50 Total Funding Requested:$5,000 Percentage of Total Cost Requested:74% 16) Target Beneficiaries: Total Estimated Attendees: 2,800 FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION Total Estimated Saratoga Residents:2,600 Estimated Percentage of Saratoga Residents:93% BUDGET AGENCY NAME:Date Prepared: Mustard FaireFebruary 12, 2010 PROGRAMNAME: 2011MustardFaire SPECIFIC ACTIVITIESBUDGET AMOUNT Food/Food Ticket Reimbursements $1,200 600 Decoration & Supplies 800 Marketing Materials (includes banner) Animals and Travel1,450 Music600 350 Sanitary Facilities TOTAL$5,000 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS AGENCY NAME: Date Prepared: Mustard FaireFebruary 12, 2010 PROGRAMNAME: Mustard Faire PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT WORKSHEET GOAL: Tocontinue the tradition of holding an annual Mustard Faire in the City’s historic orchard. OBJECTIVE (1):OUTCOME (1): Begin organizing the Mustard Faire in Renew participation/partnerships with relevant October/November 2010so that all facilities, community organizations (e.g. Historical parking, banner reservation and main activities Foundation, Chamber of Commerce, SASCC, (e.g. historic vehicles, animals, vendors, Taiko Drummers, etc.) artisans) are solidified well in advance of the 2011 Faire. OBJECTIVE (2):OUTCOME (2): Form a broad-based committee to plan, organize A committee representing the above and implement the Mustard Faire so that there is organizations and other community volunteers a larger groups of volunteers from which to undertakes the majority of tasks related to draw supportand to accomplish tasks.planning, organizing and implementing the Faire. FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION DATE: 2/12/10 Application Instructions Sheet Please refer to the for details on the following questions. Please limit your answers to one paragraph per question 1) :Shady Shakespeare Theatre Company (SSTC) Organization/Agency Name PO BOX 520, Santa Clara, CA 95052-0520 Agency Address: Dinna Myers Executive Director: 408-569-0360NoneDinna@shadyshakes.org Phone:Fax:E-Mail: Agency isaFaith Based Organization:____Yes__X__No 2) Free Shakespeare in Sanborn Park, Saratoga Program Title: 16055 Sanborn Road, Saratoga, CA 95070 Program Address: Dinna Myers / Managing Director Contact Person/Title: 408-569-0360408-986-9552Dinna@shadyshakes.org Phone:Fax:E-Mail: 3) $3,500.00 City of Saratoga grant funds requested this year(FY10/11): 4) $2,500.00–2009 City of Saratoga grant funds requested in the past: $2,500.00-2009 City of Saratoga grant funds received in the past: 5) Programdescription and number of unduplicated clients served: SSTC produces 22 performances of twoShakespearian plays in Sanborn-Skyline County Park in Saratoga each summer. In 2010we will be producing Much Ado About Nothingand The Merchant of Venice free to the public from July 30th –September 5th, Thursday through Sunday evenings at 7pm, . While our core audience comes primarily from Saratoga, Monte Sereno, Los Gatos, Cupertino, Campbell, Sunnyvale, and San Jose, there are also a number of people who travel in from the East Bay, Peninsula, and San Francisco. Because SSTC strives to make its work attainable to persons of all educational and cultural backgrounds, our audiences mirror the diversity of the Silicon Valley itself. As performances are free to the public, SSTC is able to provide a quality theatrical experience to everyone, regardless of socioeconomic standing. Our services are of special interest to families who would not ordinarily be able to expose their children to the magic of live theatre without our summer program. SSTC’s 2009 productions of Richard III and As You Like It were attended by approximately 4000 people, 17% of who were children under the age of 18.Since many of these people see both productions, we estimate that the unduplicated number is approximately 3,000. 6) Programpurpose and objectives: SSTCis a 501(c)3 corporation committed to providing Silicon Valley residents the opportunity to experience the performing arts and to building community through cultural participation. Our particular brand of theatre demystifies the rich and challenging language of Shakespeare without dumbing it down, bringing people from all walks of life together to enjoy one of the most significant playwrights of all-time. Not charging for tickets puts SSTC at a significant disadvantage. We must rely heavily on public FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION giving and corporate and private foundations to keep the dream of free Shakespeare alive. It is for this reason that we have come to the City of Saratoga to request support for our core program, Free Shakespeare in the Park. In thiseconomy, thousands of families will be counting on programs like ours to keep art and culture affordable in our community. In 2009, the City of Saratoga supported SSTC with a grant for audience development. At each performance we asked people to raise their hands if this was thefirst time they had attended a free performance at Shady Shakespeare. The number of hands that went up was astounding. As a result, we saw an overall increase in attendance by new patrons. We are asking for assistance again in 2010 to continue our audience development program. The objective remains to increase awareness of our program with Saratoga residents and develop a larger Saratoga audience. Increasing awareness of our programs in the Saratoga communityleadsto audience development, stronger community investment, and increased volunteerism.Moreover, each person who attends an SSTC performance passes through Saratoga Village, often stopping to shop, dine, and stimulate the city’s economy. 7) Programmanagement: Shady Shakespeare is run entirely by volunteers. The Artistic Director, Larry Barrott, is responsible for maintaining artistic integrity and the quality of the experience for both the participants and the public. The Artistic Director selects programming, interfaces with other theatre and arts groups, chooses artistic staff, and oversees the artistic ensemble.The Managing Director, Dinna Myers, is responsible for the business aspects of the organization such as marketing and public relations, fundraising, grant writing, volunteer development, organizational development, and production management. Fiscal and program oversight is provided by the Board of Directors. In 2009, we were pleased to engage approximately 50 community volunteers. Their duties included set, prop, and costume construction, technical operation, fundraising, marketing, house management, concession sales, ushering, graphic and website design, and event management. 8) Agency description and experience: Dinna Myers and Sara Betts founded SSTC in 1999.For the first three years, the company performed one play each summer in a variety of locations in the South Bay and Peninsula and we charged for tickets. In 2002, SSTC moved to Sanborn-Skyline County Park in Saratoga and began making performances free to the public. In 2005, SSTC expanded its programming to performingtwo plays in repertory. In 2010, we are providing22 free performances over the summer.We do not have something specifically called a Financial Statement. We have attached a Standard Profit Loss Report for 2009. SSTC’s mission is as follows. Shakespeare:To be a proponent of the works of William Shakespeare and to make these works accessible to people from all walks of life. To be the voice of Shakespeare in a modern society, and to bring the universal messages of his work to the people of the Silicon Valley. Artistry:To provide an environment that nurtures, fulfills, educates, and excites theatrical artists while allowing them to further their artistic and personal goals. Excellence: To createexperiences that push the envelope of theatrical performance, inspire audiences, incite personal reflection, and challenge paradigms. FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION Strength:To maintain an artistic organization that enhances the quality of life in the Bay Area, is an asset to the community it serves, and is valued by that community. To be the kind of organization that compels people to become involved in and contribute to its workings. Diversity:To encourage and demonstrate cultural diversity by providing opportunities to all artists and volunteers without regard to race, creed, or gender. To support economic diversity by making art available to people of all economic and sociological backgrounds. Responsibility: To be a responsible member of the artistic, environmental, and economic community. 9) Audit information: Shady Shakespeare Theatre Company is too small to have its financial dataprofessionally audited.Our entire budget for the 2010 fiscal year is only $85,000.00. As stated above, we have provided a Profit and Loss Statement from 2009, generated by Quicken, for your perusal. 10) Sources of funds anticipated for this project: Shady Shakespeare’s fiscal year budget for 2009 is $85,000.00. Since we do not charge our patrons for tickets, we must seek other sources of funding. SSTC holds many fundraising events throughout the year, including a Poker Tournament, direct mail campaign, and Benefit Gala. We sell merchandise and concessions at each performance and the actors pass the hat at performances. Giving by theatergoers is approximately $3.00 per capita.SSTC is funded in part by Arts Council Valley, Target Stores, Applied Materials, andthe Kvamme Foundation. In 2010we are also requesting support several foundations and corporations as detailed in the Leveraging portion of this application. None of these grantors provide multiyear support, so we are never sure from year to year if we will receive funding. Since our performances are free-to-the-public, we rely entirely on the generosity of the business and philanthropic community to keep Shakespeare alive in the Silicon Valley. 11) Budget: Please see attachedworksheet. 12) Performance Measurements: Pleasesee attached worksheet. 13) Outreach: SSTC markets its productions to Saratoga residents and to the entire Silicon Valley in a variety of media. SSTC website at http://www.shadyshakes.org, Local event websites such as with Artsopolis, Gold Star, Eventbee, and online calendars with the Mercury News, Metro, and Wave Magazines. Monthly e-mail newsletters using Constant Contact as our e-provider Print advertisements in Community Newspapers Postcard mailing to people who have attended previous productions. We also participate in the Bay area Big List with other theatre companies as well to reach new audiences of proven art buyers. Flyers are distributed by company members, volunteers and various organizations that support the arts. FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION Every attempt is made to engage the broadcast and print media where possible through press releases. Although SSTC saw a spike in new audiences as a result of the grant we received for audience development in 2009, there is no way to provide an accurate account of how many were Saratoga residents. We can show an overall 10% growth of ourmailing list from 2008 to 2009. 14) Leveraging: In 2009, only 24% of SSTC’ income was from grants totaling $19,557.00. We received $2,457.00 from theArts Council Silicon Valley,$5,000.00 from Adobe, $2,600.00 from the Saratoga Rotary Club, $2,000.00 from Target Stores, and $5,000.00 from Applied Materials, in addition to the $2,500 received from the City of Saratoga. In 2010we are requesting a total of $20,500.00 from 6organizations (including this grant request), which is approximately 24% ofour budget. We do not anticipate being 100% successful in our grant writing, so we have only budgeted to actually receive $15,500.00. We will be applying to the Arts Council Silicon Valley on March 1stand o expect to receive around $2,500.00 in June. Each March we request $2,000.00 from Target Stores and that funding arrives o in October if it is approved. We havesubmitted a request to the Kvamme Foundation for $5,000.00, which o has no set deadline for giving. We haverecently submitted to the Bank of AmericaFoundation for $5,000.00 o and will know the results in 45 days. We will be soliciting the Mercury News for a cash Grant in the amount of o $2,500.00 in March for receipt in August. It is important to understand that the arts are funded differently that health and human services. Funding is scarce and highly competitive. Shady Shakespeare designs its budget to be flexible in the event that we are not funded by a particular foundation. SSTC carries no debt of any kind. 15) Cost / Benefit Analysis: Total Program Cost: $85,000.00 Total Attendees to Free Shakespeare in Sanborn Park: 4200total, 3500 Unduplicated estimated. Total Cost Per Client: Approximately $20.00 per capita Total Amount of Funding Requested: $3,500.00 Percentage of Total Cost Requested for Funding: 4% 16) Target Beneficiaries: 350 Total Estimated Saratoga Residents Served: 10% Total Estimated Percentage of our Audience that are Saratoga Residents: BUDGET AGENCY NAME: Shady Shakespeare Theatre CompanyDate Prepared: 2/12/10 PROGRAMNAME: Free Shakespeare in Sanborn Park SPECIFIC ACTIVITIESBUDGET AMOUNT Can be broken down quarterly or annually (please specify)Annually Artist Stipends-$19,500.00 Production Expenses -scenery, costumes, lighting, props, sound, etc-$14,500.00 . Marketing and Publicity-$8,000.00 Rent-$12,000.00 Insurance-$4,600.00 Administrative-$4,100.00 Fundraising-$10,000.00 Special Programs (not related to Free Shakespeare in the Park)-$12,300.00 TOTAL EXPENSES-85,000.00 Grants and Sponsorships+15,500.00 Individual Giving and Corporate Matching+17,500.00 Special Event Fundraising –Gala, Poker Tournament, ArtsWalk+12,000.00 Earned Income –Concession Sales, Merchandising, Advertising +40,000.00 Sales,Passing the Hat, TOTAL INCOME+85,000.00 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS AGENCY NAME: Shady Shakespeare Theatre CompanyDate Prepared: 2/12/10 PROGRAMNAME: Free Shakespeare in Sanborn Park PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT WORKSHEET GOAL: SSTC’s goal for thisrequest is toenhance the quality of life in Saratoga by providing low cost access to the performing arts to its residents and residents of the Silicon Valley. OBJECTIVE (1):OUTCOME (1): Our objective is to provide 22 performance of Increase overall attendance at our performances two of Shakespeare’s plays free to the public in in 2010.We are hoping todouble the Saratoga thth Sanborn Park from July 30–September 5,and Monte Sereno segment of our audienceto 2010. One of our primary strategic goals isto approximately 600 or 20%. make Saratoga residents aware of our free program and engage them as audience members Increase community investment by Saratoga and elevate them to donor/investors or residents by informing them of volunteer and volunteers in the organization.donor-investor opportunities.Better community involvement should lead to a stronger organization with better fundraising power to support its programs OBJECTIVE (2):OUTCOME (2): FY 2010-2011CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION DATE: ____ February 11, 2010 Application Instructions Sheet Please refer to the for details on the following questions. Please limit your answers to one paragraph per question 1) Applicant Organization/Agency Name: Wildlife Center of Silicon Valley Agency Address:3027 Penitencia Creek Road, San Jose, CA 95132 Executive Director:Larry L. Stites, InterimExecutive Director Phone:408-929-9453Fax:408-928-5853E-Mail:info@wcsv.org Agency isaFaith Based Organization:____Yes_XNo 2) Program Title :Wildlife rehabilitation and release and wildlife education and outreach Program Address:3027 Penitencia Creek Road, San Jose, CA 95132 Contact Person/Title:Larry L. Stites, InterimExecutive Director Phone: 408-929-9453Fax:408-928-5853E-Mail: info@wcsv.org 3) $4,212.00 City of Saratoga grant funds requested this year (FY10/11): 4) City of Saratogagrantfunds requestedin the past: The Wildlife Center of Silicon Valley requested grant funds of $4,000 for each of FY2005/2006 and FY2006/2007 and $4,212 for each of the fiscal years from FY2007/2008 through FY2009/2010. City of Saratogagrantfunds receivedin the past: The Wildlife Center of Silicon Valley (WCSV) received grant funds of $4,000 for each of FY2005/2006 and FY2006/2007 and $4,212 for each of the fiscal years from FY2007/2008 through FY2009/2010. WCSV also received $2,000 for each of the fiscal years from FY2005/2006 through FY2009/2010as part ofthe City of Saratoga’s contract with San Jose Animal Care andServices. 5) Programdescription and number of unduplicated clients served: The Wildlife Center of Silicon Valley (WCSV) provides high quality care and rehabilitation tosome 4,000injured, sick and orphanedlocalbirds and mammalsannually representing more than 100 species.The WCSV is the only wildlife rehabilitation facility available to many of the animals in Silicon Valley, and it is one of the most efficient and cost effectivewildlife rehabilitation facilitiesin the entire Bay Area. The primary goal of our care and rehabilitation efforts is to release as many animals as possible back into the wild. In addition, we respond to a wide range of questions about wildlife and through education programs, foster a positive coexistence between the general public and wildlife and encourage an interest in and concern for wildlife conservation issues. The WCSV provides its services to any resident of the City of Saratoga at no charge. We’re not able to estimate the number of Saratoga residents who will be requesting our services since we only respond to requests. Historically, Saratoga residents have brought FY 2010-2011CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION us around 100animals per year, and we’ve responded to some 175to 200telephone and e-mail inquiries. 6) Programpurpose and objectives: The Wildlife Center of Silicon Valley (WCSV) provides high quality care and rehabilitation to some 4,000 injured, sick and orphaned local birds and mammals annually representing more than 100 species. The primary goal of our care and rehabilitation efforts is to release as many animals as possible back into the wildthereby mitigating to some extent some of the adverse environmental impacts of urbanization. In addition, we respond to a wide range of questions about wildlife and through education programs, foster a positive coexistence between the general public and wildlife and encourage an interest in and concern for wildlife conservation issues. 7)Programmanagement: The Wildlife Center of Silicon Valley (WCSV) currently has three full-time employees. Twoof the employees manage the wildlife rehabilitation program and the third employee is responsible for volunteer recruitment, education and coordination;education and outreach;animal intake and responses to public inquiries. An additional animal care staff person will be employed from March through August2010when WCSV will be operating12 hours per day, seven days a week. TheWCSV has some 175volunteers participatingin itswildlife rehabilitationand education/outreachprogramsduring its peak and a few other volunteers assistingwith administration and maintenance.Animal care volunteers generally commit to one four-hour shift per weekand volunteers contribute a total of almost 30,000hours per year.TheInterimExecutive Director, a full-time volunteer, alongwith the Board of Directors are responsible for theoverall management of the WCSV. 8) Agency description and experience: Since 1993, the Wildlife Center of Silicon Valley (WCSV) has been providing high quality care and rehabilitation to injured, sick and orphaned wildlife in Silicon Valley. The WCSV is the only wildlife rehabilitation facilityavailable to many of the animals in Silicon Valley, and it is one of the most efficient and cost effective in the entire Bay Area. The primary goal of our care and rehabilitation efforts is to release as many animals as possible back into the wild. In addition, we respond toa wide range of questions about wildlife and through education programs, foster a positive coexistence between the general public and wildlife and encourage an interest in and concern for wildlife conservation issues.This service has been provided to the residents of the City of Saratoga since 1999. The WCSV mission statement is: “To provide high quality care and rehabilitation of injured, sick and orphaned wildlife within the Silicon Valley community. Through educational programs, we foster apositive coexistence between the general public and wildlife and encourage an interest in and concern for wildlife conservation issues.” FY 2010-2011CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION The 2008 Federal Form 990-EZ (the most recent available) is included as part of this application along with the preliminary internal calendar year 2009 Financial Statements. 9) Audit information: The Wildlife Center of Silicon Valley does not have an annual financial audit. 10) Sources of funds anticipated for this project: The Wildlife Center of Silicon Valley (WCSV) receives the majority of its operating fundsfrom private donations. It also receives service fees from nine cities whose residents avail themselves of WCSV’s services. A third source of operating funds is from investments and occasional grants.Capital funding is usually received from restricted grants. SOURCE AMOUNT STATUS Private donations$137,400Uncommitted Service fees$121,711Uncommitted/pending approval Grants$3,000Uncommitted Investment income$2,115Uncommitted TOTAL$264,226 11) Budget: Pleaseuse the attached worksheet. 12)Performance Measurements: Pleaseuse the attached worksheet. 13) Outreach: The Wildlife Center of Silicon Valley (WCSV) advises area residents and the general public of its services primarily through newspaper articles and other media. Often the information relates to the care of animals it receives. People who bring animals to the WCSV for care and/or who make contributions receive a newsletter about the activities of the organization twice a year. We also respond to a wide range of questions about wildlife and through education presentations to school, neighborhood and community groups, foster a positive coexistence between the general public and wildlife and encourage aninterest in and concern for wildlife conservation issues. Whenever possible, we include one of our two education animals in our wildlife presentations. 14) Leveraging: The following schedule shows the actual Sources of Funding received for each of the last five calendar years (2005 through 2009) and the projected Sources of Funding for the current calendar year, 2010. The percentage of total expenses represented by each source of fundingis also shown. FY 2010-2011CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION WILDLIFE CENTER OF SILICON VALLEY SOURCES OF FUNDING BY YEAR FOR THE YEARS 2005 THROUGH 2009 CY2005CY2006CY2007CY2008CY2009CY2010 øÐ®±¶»½¬»¼÷ SOURCES OF FUNDING Service Fees (Note A) êôððð êôððð êôîïî êôîïî êôîïî êôîïî Saratoga çíôéèí ïðèôëìç ïîèôçðé ïîîôíìï ïðïôêðë ïïëôìçç Other cities (8) Total-Service ççôéèí ïïìôëìç ïíëôïïç ïîèôëëí ïðéôèïé ïîïôéïï Fees îðîôééî ïëçôèçé ïéíôèêè ïíèôêêî ïìðôêîí ïíéôìðð Individual Donations ð îìôëêé éêôðëê ïðìôèêë íôíîé ð Estates and Bequests ëôéíð îôìëð îôéëð ëðð ëðð íôððð Grants Investment and Other ïôëðì ìôïéî èôîëê ïðôìîð ïïôðçé îôïïë Income íðçôéèç íðëôêíë íçêôðìç íèíôððð îêíôíêí îêìôîîé Total Income FUNDING AS % OF TOTAL EXPENSES Service Fees (Note A) îòëû îòíû îòéû íòðû îòëû îòîû Saratoga íçòîû ìïòçû ëëòîû ëçòèû ìïòéû ìïòìû Other cities (8) Total-Service ìïòéû ììòîû ëéòçû êîòçû ììòîû ìíòêû Fees èìòèû êïòéû éìòëû êéòèû ëéòéû ìçòîû Individual Donations ðòðû çòëû íîòêû ëïòíû ïòìû ðòðû Estates and Bequests îòìû ðòçû ïòîû ðòîû ðòîû ïòïû Grants Investment and Other ðòêû ïòêû íòëû ëòïû ìòêû ðòèû Income NOTE A--Almost all of the variation in the service fees between years is due to the timing of some payments, particularly payments received on a monthly or quarterly basis. Services fees by fiscal year are shown below. FY2005/2006FY2006/2007FY2007/2008FY2008/2009FY2009/2010FY2010/2011 øÐ®±¶»½¬»¼÷ SERVICE FEES ON A FISCAL YEAR BASIS êôððð êôððð êôîïî êôîïî êôîïî êôîïî Saratoga ïïìôìéê ïïèôîïë ïïèôëëë ïïèôèëð ïðéôìêç ïðéôìêç Other cities (8) FY 2010-2011CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION Total-Service ïîðôìéê ïîìôîïë ïîìôéêé ïîëôðêî ïïíôêèï ïïíôêèï Fees 15) Cost / Benefit Analysis: The following schedule shows the actual Cost per Animal for the animals received in each of the last five calendar years (2005 through 2009) and the projected cost for the current calendar year, 2010. It also shows the service fees received in each of the years 2005 through 2009 and requested for the year 2010 from the City of Saratoga and the percentage those fees represent of total expenses. The percentages of total services received by the residents of Saratoga both for animal care and wildlife telephone inquiries are also reported. WILDLIFE CENTER OF SILICON VALLEY COST PERANIMAL AND SUMMARY OF SERVICES RECEIVED BY SARATOGA RESIDENTS BY YEAR FOR THE YEARS 2005 THROUGH 2010 CY2005CY2006CY2007CY2008CY2009CY2010 øÐ®±¶»½¬»¼÷ îíçôðçê îëèôçêì îííôíìé îðìôëîé îìíôéðè îéçôîïê Total Expenses ìôèíí íôèêî ìôðèí ìôíèè ìôïíê ìôîðð TotalAnimals Received ìçòìé êéòðë ëéòïë ìêòêï ëèòçî êêòìè Cost per Animal Received Service Fees Received/Requested from êôððð êôððð êôîïî êôîïî êôîïî êôîïî Saratoga Saratoga Service Fees as % of Total îòëû îòíû îòéû íòðû îòëû îòîû Expenses Services Received by Saratoga Animals as % of Total Animals îòìû ïòéû ïòëû îòïû îòìû îòîû Received ²±¬ Telephone Inquiries as % of Total ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» îòêû íòèû íòìû íòêû íòëû Telephone Inquiries 16) Target Beneficiaries: The following schedule shows the number of residents who received direct services from the Wildlife Center of Silicon Valley (WCSV) for each of the years 2005 through 2009. In addition, during 2009, the WCSV held two education presentationsin the City of Saratoga, which were attended by a total of 65 residents (representing approximately 3.6% of the education/outreach program). FY 2010-2011CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION WILDLIFE CENTER OF SILICON VALLEY SARATOGA RESIDENTS SERVED BY YEAR FOR THE YEARS 2005 THROUGH 2009 CY2005CY2006CY2007CY2008CY2009 Animals Received from Saratoga ïïé êë êï çì çè Residents Wildlife Inquiries from Saratoga çí îïï ïéé ïèì Residents Following is a listing of the animals received from the residents of Saratoga for the year 2009. CategorySpeciesTotal Þ·®¼ ß³»®·½¿² Ý®±© ç ß³»®·½¿² Ù±´¼º·²½¸ ï ß³»®·½¿² Î±¾·² ï ß²²¿ù Ø«³³·²¹¾·®¼ ì Þ»©·½µù É®»² ë Þ´¿½µó¸»¿¼»¼ Ù®±¾»¿µ ï Þ®¿²¼¬ù Ý±®³±®¿²¬ ï Þ®»©»®ù Þ´¿½µ¾·®¼ ï Þ®±©² Ì¸®¿¸»® ï Þ®±©²ó¸»¿¼»¼ Ý±©¾·®¼ î Ý¿´·º±®²·¿ Ù«´´ î Ý¿´·º±®²·¿ Ï«¿·´ ï Ý±±°»®ù Ø¿©µ î Ü¿®µó»§»¼ Ö«²½± î Ü±³»¬·½ Ü«½µ ï Û«®±°»¿² Í¬¿®´·²¹ í Ø»®®·²¹ Ù«´´ ï Ø±«» Ú·²½¸ ë Ø±«» Í°¿®®±© ï Ø±«» É®»² ï Ó¿´´¿®¼ î Ó±«®²·²¹ Ü±ª» ê Î»¼ó¬¿·´»¼ Ø¿©µ ï Î±½µ Ð·¹»±² ï Ê¿«¨ù Í©·º¬ ï Þ·®¼ Ì±¬¿´ ëê Ó¿³³¿´ Þ´¿½µó¬¿·´»¼ Ü»»® í Þ®«¸ Î¿¾¾·¬ ë Ý¿´·º±®²·¿ Ù®±«²¼ Í¯«·®®»´ ï Û¿¬»®² Ú±¨ Í¯«·®®»´ î Û¿¬»®² Ù®¿§ Í¯«·®®»´ ïç FY 2010-2011CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION Î¿½½±±² ë Î±±º Î¿¬ ï Í¬®·°»¼ Íµ«²µ î Ì±©²»²¼ù Ó±´» ï Ê·®¹·²·¿ Ñ°±«³ ï É±±¼ Î¿¬ î Ó¿³³¿´ Ì±¬¿´ ìî Ù®¿²¼ Ì±¬¿´ çè BUDGET AGENCY NAME: ____Date Prepared: __ Wildlife Center of Silicon ValleyFebruary 11, 2010 PROGRAMNAME: ______ Wildlife care and rehabilitation and wildlife education and outreach SPECIFIC ACTIVITIESBUDGET AMOUNT (CALENDAR YEAR 2010) Animal Care and Rehabilitation Personnel expenses$115,167 Food, medicine and supplies43,000 Facilities maintenance and security10,500 Other animal care and rehabilitation expenses6,500 Education and Outreach (including newsletter)8,400 Program Support Personnel expenses54,249 Utilities24,100 Other program supportexpenses17,300 TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENSES$279,216 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS AGENCY NAME: ____Date Prepared: ___ Wildlife Center of Silicon ValleyFebruary 11, 2010 PROGRAMNAME: ________ Wildlife care and rehabilitation and wildlife education and outreach PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT WORKSHEET GOAL: To provide high quality care and rehabilitation to the injured, sick and orphaned wildlife that are brought to our facility. To conduct education and outreach programs that help area residents develop a better understanding of and respect for local wildlife and avoid and/or resolve potential wildlife/human conflicts. OBJECTIVE (1):OUTCOME (1): To provide the most appropriate and effective To release back into the environment as manyas care possible to the injured, sick and orphaned possibleof the injured, sick and orphaned wildlifethat are brought to our facility.wildlifewe receive for care. OBJECTIVE (2):OUTCOME (2): To continue to develop the volunteer resources To increase the number of wildlife education that will enable us to conduct as many education presentations and the number of local and outreach programs as possible.community events in which we participate commensurate with the number of volunteers we can train to lead these events, thereby reaching a greater number of residents. FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION DATE: January 25, 2010 Application Instructions Sheet Please refer to the for details on the following questions. Please limit your answers to one paragraph per question 1) Applicant Organization/Agency Name: Catholic Charities of Santa ClaraCounty Agency Address:2625 Zanker Road, Suite 200, San Jose, CA 95134-2107 Executive Director:Gregory Kepferle Phone:(408) 325-5114Fax:(408) 944-0275E-Mail:gkepferle@catholiccharitiesscc.org Agency isaFaith Based Organization:____Yes____No 2) Program Title :Long Term Care Ombudsman Program Program Address:2625 Zanker Road, Suite 200, San Jose, CA 95134-2107 Contact Person/Title:Wanda Hale, Program Manager Phone:(408) 325-5269Fax:(408) 944-0776E-Mail: whale@catholiccharitiesscc.org 3) City of Saratogagrantfunds requestedin the past: $5,000 for Fiscal Year 09-10 4) City of Saratogagrantfunds receivedin the past: $5,000 for Fiscal Year 09-10 General Fund 5) Programdescription and number of unduplicated clients served: 288 The LTC Ombudsman Program and its services are distinctive in purpose and scope and unduplicated in Santa Clara County. The Program specifically serves residents in long term care facilitieswith unimpeded legal and confidential access to these residents 7 days a week. Ombudsmen partner with residents, their families, long term care facilities, community organizations and other interested parties to improve the quality of life for long term care residents. Living in a long term care facility is often not the first choice for anyone but for residents who have to live in a facility it is important that they know their rights. Each resident has the right to shape their own long term care experience. Often,long term care residents lackthe ability to exercise their rights, or voice complaints about their circumstances. The Program will accomplish our goalsfor fiscal year 10-11,by conducting a minimum of 44unannounced site visits to licensed Saratogalong term care facilities during which we will make contact with a minimum of 288unduplicated residents. LTC Ombudsmen will observe the environment and monitor conditions in long term care facilities and work to improve the delivery of long term care services.Issues regarding residents’ rights, unmet needs will be handled and resolved effectively while maintaining resident and complainantconfidentiality 6) Programpurpose and objectives: ___________________________________________ The Long Term Care Ombudsman Program was developed in response to widely reported concerns that our most frail and vulnerable citizens, those living in long term care facilities, were subject to abuse, neglect, and substandard care. The majority of residents are in long term care facilities because they have physical and/or mental illnesses and chronic conditions. The goal of Ombudsman unannounced regularvisits is the improvement of the quality of care and life in the FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION long term carefacility.Residents must rely on the staff to help them meet their physicalneeds. Quality of care needsare services and activities to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Quality of life requiresa facility tocare for its residents in such a manner and in an environment thatwill promote maintenance or enhancement of the life of each resident. An Ombudsman sees that these “quality of care” and life needs are being met. The LTCOmbudsman Program and its services are distinctive in purpose and scope and unduplicated in Santa Clara County.Ombudsmen protect and help improve the quality of lifeand carefor the frailest of our senior and disabled population. The Long Term Care Ombudsman Program has a unique role. The Program specifically serves residents in long term care facilities with unimpeded legal and confidential access to these residents 7 days a week. As independent advocates, the Long Term Care Ombudsman Program is the only certified, unrestricted organization that can go into long term care facilities on a resident’s behalf. The resident is at the center of the provision of long-term care services as a consumer. The Ombudsman Program reinforces the centrality ofthe resident. The care setting in which the vulnerable and dependent resident is placed has its own priorities and constraints. The balance of power is tilted towards the provider, and one of the functions of the Long-term care Ombudsman is to correct this tendency. The effect of cumulative visitation, at unannounced times throughout a year, raises the level of staff accountability to care for all of the residents. Ultimately the goal of such visits is the improvement of the quality of care and life in that facility. Ombudsmen have a combination of functions including visitation, complaint and crisis response and advocacy. Ombudsmen, reach out to residents who may be unable to speak for themselves, and are surrounded by real and illusionary barriers between themselves and the community. State-certified Ombudsmen provide a personalized approach to service delivery. One of the results of repeated visiting is the building of trust with residents so they will be willing to confide in the Ombudsman. Regular contact with residents makes residents more likely to express concerns that might not otherwise surface. These visits must be done with confidence, focus, and all senses engaged in order to detect issues that may affect the quality of care and the ò quality of life of the residents During grant year 10-11, the Program will accomplish our goals by conducting a minimum of 44 unannouncedsite visits to licensed Saratoga long term care facilities during which we will make contact with a minimumof 288 unduplicated residents. Through response to all consumer telephone inquiries and 1 Community Education presentation, the Ombudsman Program willpartner with residents, their families, long term care facilities, community organization and other interested parties to provide information and referral on issues and concerns impacting long term care residents. 7) Programmanagement:___________________________________________________ As advocates, LTC Ombudsmen are accountable to the residents served. An advocacy perspective starts with the resident and attempts to examine services through the eyes of the resident. As advocates, Ombudsmen are accountable to the residents served. The effectiveness of the Ombudsman system should be measured by its responsiveness to residents needs. FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION The Program records are analyzed to measure the strength of our presence at facilities and availability to residents and other concerned parties. The effectiveness of an Ombudsman is largely dependent on his or her ability to make regular visits to their assigned facilities. On a monthly basis Ombudsmen are required to submit a Monthly Activity Summary Report documenting number of facility visits, number of unduplicated resident contacts, and hours. Ideally, the Ombudsman approaches a complaint from the resident’s perspective, with the resident’s satisfaction the foremost goal in resolving the complaint. Ombudsmen submit Case/Complaint Investigation Formsfor each complaint opened, investigated, and the disposition/resolution identified. This documentation is reviewed and analyzed in relationship to measurable objectives. The Program Manager will review objectives and activity plan on a quarterly basis in order to assign Ombudsmen and resources to maximize the potential of the Program to individual residents. The Program is monitored by 12other cities, the Council on Aging (Area Agency of Aging), Catholic Charities and the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman. These measurement tools will determine how well we are meeting our goals and whether we are effective in our advocacy. Catholic Charities of Santa Clara has administered the Long Term Care Ombudsman Program in Santa Clara County since 1981. At the present time, the experience of the Ombudsman assigned to this Saratoga activity ranges from 14 to 2years. Staff have backgrounds in Health Science, Healthcare Administration, Marriage and Family Therapy, Social Welfareand Public Health. The Program Manager oversees daily operations, including the monitoring of facility coverage and complaint investigation by certified Ombudsmen. Field Ombudsmen (staff and volunteer) receive, identify, investigate, and seek resolution of complaints made by or on behalf of residents in long term care facilities. This Ombudsman’s focus is advocacy for the institutionalized. The Program Assistant’s primary purpose is to provide comprehensive administrative support services to Ombudsmen, and to conduct detailed telephone intake of complaints and reports of elder/dependent adult abuse. The Volunteer Coordinator recruits, trains, and administers the volunteer component of the Program. Currently there are 31Certified Ombudsman volunteers. Volunteers are a central part of the Long Term Care Ombudsman Program as a corps of specially trained and certified citizen volunteers. Many volunteers are retired professionals from various fields. Ombudsman volunteers are special. They are asked to make a significant commitment to the Program, not only in terms of training, on going in-services but through weekly contact with residents, travel and reporting requirements. Dedicated Ombudsmen volunteers spend an average of four to six hours a week in each of their assigned facilities advocating for residents. During fiscal year 08- 09, Santa Clara County certified Ombudsman volunteers donated more than 4,800 hours to the Program. The heart of the LTCOP is the visible volunteer representative working out in the community. To become a certified LTC Ombudsman requires:successful completion of 36-hour classroom training program, plus a minimum of 10 hours of field internship supervised by an experienced certifiedOmbudsman, and passinga California Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation criminal background clearance. FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION The Program is a professional program with volunteers at the core. The Program recruits Ombudsman volunteers to make site visits to long term care facilities, interview residents, receive, identify, investigate and resolve complaints, and witness Advance Health Care Directives. To maintain certification, Ombudsmen annually complete 12 hours of continuing education provided by the local program and compliance with State and local program protocols. Ombudsmen are supported by a network of fellow Ombudsmen, Program Manager, Volunteer Coordinator and the CA State Office of the Long Term Care Ombudsman (OSLTCO). The adoption of the volunteer service model stems primarily from the belief that a community presence in a long term care facility has a direct, positive correlation with the quality of life in an institutional setting. Each year, the Program conducts a minimum of 2 recruitment campaigns to increase our volunteer base and to combat natural attrition rates. Current Ombudsman volunteers have backgrounds as physicians, nurses, educators, real estate managers, accountants, clergy, and social services. The Long Term Care Ombudsman Program is an extremely professional and highly cost effective with volunteers being the core of the program. The In-Kind value for trained and certified Long Term Care Ombudsman volunteer services in 2008/2009 was over $87,000. One volunteer is a Saratoga resident.Two volunteers are currently assigned to Saratoga facilities. The two volunteers assigned to Saratoga facilities are retired individuals with professional backgrounds as a physician and licensed marriage and family therapist. 8) Agency description and experience:________________________________________ Catholic Charities serves and advocates for families and individuals in need, especially those living in poverty. Rooted in gospel values, we work to create a more just and compassionate community in which people of all cultures and beliefs can participate. Catholic Charities clientele include frail elderly, youth-at-risk, single parent and kinshipcare families, individuals with disabilities and mental illness, and those newly settled in this county. Catholic Charities has been serving Santa Clara County for more than 50 years. Catholic Charities offers a wide variety of Programs to help familiesand individuals. The Long Term Care Ombudsman Program, within the Older Adult Services division, serves individuals who due to frailty or chronic illness, and the need for twenty four hour care and supervision, are unable to live or be cared for in their own homes and reside in licensed long term care facilities. Federal and State laws mandate that Ombudsmen are available to elderly residents of long-term care facilities in order to ensure care provided meets minimum standards required. The Long Term Care Ombudsman Program at Catholic Charities holds the contract to deliver . these services in Santa Clara County Catholic Charities of Santa Clara County has administered the LTC Ombudsman Program in Santa Clara County since 1981. At the present time, the experience of the LTC Ombudsmen assigned to this activity range from 15 to 2 years. The program is established, staffed and ready to provide services on July 1, 2010. FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION 9) Audit information: _______________________________________________________ The agency audit for Fiscal Year 08-09 was completed on September 30, 2009 by Berger/Lewis AccountancyCorporation, 99 Almaden Blvd., Suite 600, San Jose, CA 95113. The audit and annual report are available as a download on Catholic Charities website, Catholiccharitiesscc.org Agency audit and management letter will be submitted as separate attached file with application. 10) Sources of funds anticipated for this project:_________________________________ For fiscal year 2010-2011, the Program is submittingfunding requests to six (6) other cities. Renewal application will be submitted to the Council on Aging Silicon Valley for federal Older Americans Act funds. The Program anticipates renewal of a multiple year contracts with seven (7) other cities/town. The Program anticipates renewal of Governor’s imitative to provide state funding for volunteer recruitment and retention. The Program continues to explore and apply for other private foundation grants that fund programs serving seniors and/or the disabled inlong term care facilities. Í±«®½» ±º ×²½±³» ß³±«²¬ Ý·¬§ ±º Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ ëôððð ïî Ñ¬¸»® Ý·¬·»ñÌ±©² ïðêôéèé Ú»¼»®¿´ ñ Ñ´¼ ß³»®·½¿² ß½¬ çêôëíí Ù±ª»®²±® ×²·¬·¿¬·ª» ñÍ¬¿¬» êìôçïï Ý¿¬¸±´·½ Ý¸¿®·¬·» Ý±³³«²·¬§ Ý±²¬®·¾«¬·±²îðôðèð Ì±¬¿´ îçíôíïï 11) Budget: Pleaseuse the attached worksheet.Completed 12)Performance Measurements: Pleaseuse the attached worksheet.Completed 13) Outreach: ______________________________________________________________ All our clients are residents in licensedlong term care facilities. The Program sees clients at their place of residence, i.c. Saratoga’s licensed long term care facilities.Regularvisitation and outreach enables clients to be aware of our services. Federal law requires each long term care facility to display information on how to contact the LTC Ombudsmen. Each facility is legally required to place a state approved poster with the LTC Ombudsman Program’s local telephone number and the 24 hour 800 CRISISline number in a conspicuous location, visible to all residents, family members and visitors. Posters are bilingual in English and Spanish. In the Nursing Facilities the law requires 4 such posters in specific locations. In Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly/Assisted Living (RCFEs) the requirement is for only one poster. Our Program brochureis available in English and Spanish. Ombudsmen FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION are available to make diverse educational presentations to community groups, to resident and family councils, and to conduct in-service training for the staff of facilities. The LTC Ombudsman Program is listed with community agencies that provide information and referral such as 211 of Santa Clara County(County-Wide information system) , Council on Aging Senior Services Directory, Peninsula Stroke Association Resource Guide and the Catholic Charities Program Brochures. All these sources also have web listings for the LTC Ombudsman Program.LTC Ombudsmen are available to make education presentations to community groups, to resident councils and family councils, and to conduct in-services for the staff of facilities. Ombudsman staff members are active in community organizations and network with other senior service providers to increase awarenessof the Program. LTC Ombudsmen staff are members of Santa Clara County Elder Death Review Committee, Santa Clara County Elder Abuse Task Force, Gerontology Social Work Team,Senior Care Commission and California Long Term Care Ombudsman Association. The program has Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) with Senior Adult Legal Assistance (SALA), Retired andSenior Volunteer Program, CA Department of Public Health, Licensing and Certification, and CA Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing. The program’s systemic advocacy is coordinated with other broad based coalitions. These relationships have been ongoing and the MOUs facilitate comprehensive service to our vulnerable clients. Ombudsman volunteer opportunitiesare listed on a number of websites. Activelistings for Ombudsman volunteer position can be found on Volunteer Match, United Way volunteer listings, Disney Parks “Give a Day Get a Day” promotion and the Catholic Charities website. 14) Leveraging: _____________________________________________________________ Estimated Dollar SourceAmountStatusTerm City of Campbell5,800Pending RFP10-11 City of Cupertino3,200Pending RFP10-12 City of Gilroy5,000Year 2 of 2 year contract09-11 City of Los Altos3,744Year 2 of 2 year contract 09-11 Town of Los Gatos7,370Year 2 of 2 year contract09-11 City of Milpitas5,000Pending RFP10-11 City of Morgan Hill4,500Pending RFP10-11 City of Mt. View8,000Year 2 of 2 year contract 09-11 City of Palo Alto5,000Year 2 of 2 year contract 09-11 City of San Jose41,000Pending RFP10-12 City of Santa Clara8,400Year 2 of 2 year contract 10-11 City of Saratoga5,000Pending RFP10-11 City of Sunnyvale9,775Year 2 of 2 year contract 09-11 Federal OAA96,533Projected09-11 Gov. Initiative64,911Projected09-11 Catholic Charities Projected Community Contribution20,08009-11 Total:293,313 FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION 15) Cost / Benefit Analysis: ___________________________________________________ Total Program Total Clients Cost Per ClientSaratoga Funding Saratoga %o f CostsServedRequestedTotal Costs 293,31310,29328.505,000<2% Saratoga cost per client is $17.36 16) Target Beneficiaries: _____________________________________________________ Frail elderly The target population of the program is the “” a High Prioritygroup who are generally low-income seniors and/or disabled individuals who are considered a special needs group.All our clients are residents in licensedlong term care facilities. Saratoga Residents to % of Total Clients to Saratoga Low Income % of Saratoga Clients be servedbe servedClients (0-80%) of County Median Income 288<3%16457% BUDGET AGENCY NAME: Date Prepared: Catholic Charities of Santa Clara CountyJanuary 22, 2010 PROGRAMNAME: Long Term Care Ombudsman Program ProposedProject Operating ExpensesAnnual Total Project Cost 2010-11 Personnel Services174,848 Fringe Benefits43,718 Indirect Admin Staff Cost29,067 Office Supplies2,390 Communication/ IT Support7,547 Printing& Advertising4,200 Travel4,800 Occupancy& Utilities19,474 Postage1,270 Insurance1,903 Organization Dues425 Audit (CDBG Portion only)1,086 Other(specify) Volunteertraining costs2,585 Total Operating Expenses$293,313 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS AGENCY NAME: Date Prepared: Catholic Charities of Santa Clara CountyJanuary 22, 2010 PROGRAMNAME: Long Term Care Ombudsman Program PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT WORKSHEET GOAL: The mission of the Long Term Care Ombudsman Program is to seek resolution of problems and advocate for the rights of residents in long term care facilities with thegoal of enhancing the quality of life and care for residents in these facilities. The Ombudsman Program promotes the interest, well being and rights of Saratoga’s long term care facility residents. Ombudsmen help residents and their families and friends understand and exercise the rights they are guaranteed by law, both at the . federal and state level OBJECTIVE (1):OUTCOME (1): Ombudsman Presence Ombudsman visitation will promote the interest, The Program will demonstrate and maintain an well being and rights of Saratoga long term care ongoing visibility through trained, certified facility residents. Ombudsman will observe the Ombudsmen. Regular contact through 44 environment and monitor conditions in long unannounced site visits and contactwith 288 term care facilities and work to improve the Saratoga unduplicated residents will build trust, ò delivery of long term care servicesvisibility and clarity of purpose, making residents more likely to express concerns that might not otherwise surface OBJECTIVE (2):OUTCOME (2): Outreach and Education Ombudsmen are available to make diverse The Program is a resource for residents, family education presentations to community groups, to members and the community on issues and resident councils and family councils, and to concerns impacting long term care residents, conduct in-services for the staff of long term long term care trends/innovations and/or ò care facilities.Frequently requested topics connected with aging include residents’ rights, dignity and respect, elder abuse, Advance Health Care Directiveand LTC Ombudsman Program services. FY 2010-2011CITY OF SARATOGA CDBGSUPPLEMENTAL Name of Applicant Organization: Catholic Charities of Santa Clara County Name of Program:Long Term Care Ombudsman Program Please complete the following questionsin addition to the Standard Applicationto determine additional requirements for CDBG eligibility: 1.Please complete the following tableswith the number of recipients for each category: Number of Unduplicated BeneficiariesNumber of Urban County unduplicated beneficiaries at or below 2 current county-wide median income CityNo. Campbell301 Income CategoryNo. Los Altos468 0-30% (Extremely low)1,080 Los Altos Hills0 31-50% (Very Low)96 Los Gatos957 51-80% (Low)576 Monte Sereno0 Morgan Hill285 Saratoga388 Unincorporated Santa Clara County33 1 Outside the Urban County7,861 10,293 Total unduplicated beneficiaries See question 2 on next page. 1The Urban County includes the unincorporated portions of the County of Santa Clara and the cities of Campbell, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, LosGatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, and Saratoga. 2Based on the attached FY 2008 HUD Income Limits for Santa Clara County 3Consolidated Planis available online at http://www.saratoga.ca.us/by The 2005-2010 Urban County clicking on the CDBG grant link under In The Spotlighton the right hand side of the webpage FY 2010-2011CITY OF SARATOGA CDBGSUPPLEMENTAL 2.How does the purpose and objectives of the proposed program meet the Urban County’s CDBG funding objectives with regard to either the UrbanCounty Priority Needsor the Urban County Non- 3 Housing Community Development Needs as described in the Consolidated Plan? frail elderly Ì¸» ¬¿®¹»¬ °±°«´¿¬·±² ±º ¬¸» Ð®±¹®¿³ · ¬¸» ©¸± ¿®» ¹»²»®¿´´§ ´±©ó ·²½±³» »²·±® ¿²¼ñ±® ¼·¿¾´»¼ ·²¼·ª·¼«¿´ ©¸± ¿®» ½±²·¼»®»¼ ¿ °»½·¿´ ²»»¼ ¹®±«°òÐ¿¹» ëê ±º ¬¸» ½±²±´·¼¿¬»¼ °´¿² ¬¿¬» ¿ ·¹²·º·½¿²¬ »¹³»²¬ ±º ¬¸» »²·±® °±°«´¿¬·±² ¸¿ ±²» ±® ³±®» ½±²¼·¬·±² ¬¸¿¬ ¿ºº»½¬ ³¿¶±® ´·º» º«²½¬·±²ô ¬¸»·® ¿¾·´·¬§ ¬± ½¿®» º±® ¬¸»³»´ª»ò Ñ«® ½´·»²¬ ¿®» ¿´´ ®»·¼»²¬ ·² Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ ´·½»²»¼ ´±²¹ ¬»®³ ½¿®» º¿½·´·¬·» ©¸± ¿®» ±º¬»² ¬¸» º®¿·´ô ½¸®±²·½¿´´§ ·´´ô °®·³¿®·´§ »´¼»®´§ ·²¼·ª·¼«¿´ ©·¬¸ °¸§·½¿´ ¿²¼ñ±® ³»²¬¿´ ·³°¿·®³»²¬ ¬¸¿¬ °®»ª»²¬ frailelderly ¬¸»³ º®±³ ´·ª·²¹ ·²¼»°»²¼»²¬´§ ®»º»®»²½»¼ ·² ¬¸» Ý±²±´·¼¿¬»¼ Ð´¿² ¿ ¬¸» ò Ì¸»» ·²¼·ª·¼«¿´ ±º¬»² º¿½» °»½·¿´ ½¸¿´´»²¹» ¼«» ¬± ¬¸»·® °¸§·½¿´ ¿²¼ñ±® ³»²¬¿´ ¸»¿´¬¸ ·«»òÌ¸· »¹³»²¬ ±º ¬¸» °±°«´¿¬·±² · ²± ´±²¹»® ¿¾´» ¬± ´·ª» ·²¼»°»²¼»²¬´§ ±® ½¿®» º±® ¬¸»³»´ª»ò Ì¸»» ®»·¼»²¬ ³¿§ ¾» «²¿¾´» ¬± ¿¼ª±½¿¬» º±® ¬¸»·® ±©² ²»»¼ ¿²¼ ®·¹¸¬ ¼«» ¬± ¬¸»·® ±«¬ ±º ¸±³» °´¿½»³»²¬ò Û´¼»®´§ô Ú®¿·´ Û´¼»®´§ ¿²¼ Ð»®±² ©·¬¸ Ü·¿¾·´·¬·» ¿®» ¿´´ ´·¬»¼ ¿ Ø·¹¸ Ð®·±®·¬§ ±² °¿¹» éê ±º ¬¸» Ý±²±´·¼¿¬»¼ Ð´¿² ØËÜ ¬¿¾´» ïò Ý¿´·º±®²·¿ ¸¿ ¿ ¹®±©·²¹ ¿¹·²¹ °±°«´¿¬·±²ò ×¬ · °®±¶»½¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¿ ¬¸» °±°«´¿¬·±² ¿¹» ¬¸» ¼»³¿²¼ º±® ´±²¹ ¬»®³ ½¿®» ©·´´ ·²½®»¿»ò ß½½±®¼·²¹ ¬± ¬¸» Ý¿´·º±®²·¿ Ø»¿´¬¸Ý¿®» Ú±«²¼¿¬·±² ®»°±®¬ California’s Fragile Nursing Home Industry 2005 ô ¬¸» ²«³¾»® ±º Ý¿´·º±®²·¿ ®»·¼»²¬ ¿¹» êë ¿²¼ ±ª»® · °®±¶»½¬»¼ ¬± ²»¿®´§ ¼±«¾´» ¾§ îðîë ¿ ´¿®¹»® ¹®±©¬¸ ®¿¬» ¬¸¿² ¿²§ ±¬¸»® ¬¿¬» ±® ¬¸» Ë²·¬»¼ Í¬¿¬» ±ª»®¿´´ øéë °»®½»²¬÷ò ß³»®·½¿² ¿®» ´·ª·²¹ ´±²¹»®ò ×² îððïô ¬¸» ´·º» »¨°»½¬¿²½§ ©¿ ééòî §»¿®ô ½±³°¿®»¼ ¬± éëòë ¶«¬ ¬»² §»¿® »¿®´·»®ò Ì¸» ²«³¾»® ±º Ý¿´·º±®²·¿ ®»·¼»²¬ ¿¹» èë ¿²¼ ±´¼»® ¬¸±» ©¸± ¿®» ³±¬ ´·µ»´§ ¬± ²»»¼ »¨¬»²¼»¼ ½¿®» ¿¬ ¸±³» ±® ·² ²«®·²¹ ¸±³» · ´·µ»´§ ¬± ³±®» ¬¸¿² ¼±«¾´» ¾§ ¬¸» §»¿® îðíðô ©¸»² ¬¸» ¾«´µ ±º ¬¸» ¾¿¾§ ¾±±³»® ©·´´ ½±³» ±º ¿¼ª¿²½» ¿¹»ò Ì¸» ½±²±´·¼¿¬»¼ °´¿² ¿´± ®»º»®»²½» ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» »²·±® °±°«´¿¬·±² ©·´´ ¹®±© ¿ ·²¼·ª·¼«¿´ ´·ª» ´±²¹»®ò Ì¸» Ð®±¹®¿³ ½±²¼«½¬»¼ «®ª»§ ±º ìçí Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ ´±²¹ ¬»®³ ½¿®» ®»·¼»²¬ ¿¬ ¬¸» ¬¿®¬ ±º ¬¸· º·½¿´ §»¿®ò Ì¸» «®ª»§ ®»°±²» ®»ª»¿´ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ¿ª»®¿¹» ¿¹» ±º ¬¸» ´±²¹ ¬»®³ ½¿®» ®»·¼»²¬ · ·²½®»¿·²¹ò Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ ´±²¹¬»®³ ½¿®» ®»·¼»²¬ ø»´¼»®´§ô º®¿·´ »´¼»®´§ ¿²¼ °»®±² ©·¬¸ ¼·¿¾·´·¬·»÷ ©¸± ½¿² ²± ´±²¹»® ´·ª» ·²¬»®°»¼»²¬´§ ©»®» ®»°±®¬»¼ ¿çè ·²¼·ª·¼«¿´ ©¸± ¿®» éðóéçô îçé ©¸± ¿®» èðóèç ¿²¼ èé ©¸± ¿®» çðõò Ñª»® çéû ±º ¬¸» ®»°±²¼»²¬ ¿®» ±ª»® éðò Ì¸· · ¿² ·²½®»¿» ±ª»® ´¿¬ §»¿®ò Ð®±¹®¿³ »®ª·½» ¿®» ½±²·¬»²¬ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» Ý±²±´·¼¿¬»¼ Ð´¿²ò Ì¸» ½¿®» »¬¬·²¹ñ ¸±«·²¹ »²ª·®±²³»²¬ ·² ©¸·½¸ ¬¸» ª«´²»®¿¾´» ¿²¼ ¼»°»²¼»²¬ ®»·¼»²¬ · °´¿½»¼ ¸¿ ·¬ ±©² °®·±®·¬·» ¿²¼ ½±²¬®¿·²¬ò Ì¸» Ñ³¾«¼³¿² Ð®±¹®¿³ ®»·²º±®½» ¬¸» ½»²¬®¿´·¬§ ±º ¬¸» ®»·¼»²¬ò Ì¸» ¾¿´¿²½» ±º °±©»® · ¬·´¬»¼ ¬±©¿®¼ ¬¸» °®±ª·¼»®ô ¿²¼ ±²» ±º ¬¸» º«²½¬·±² ±º ¬¸» Ô±²¹ó¬»®³ ½¿®» Ñ³¾«¼³¿² · ¬± ½±®®»½¬ ¬¸· ¬»²¼»²½§ò Ì¸» Ð®±¹®¿³ ©·´´ ¼»³±²¬®¿¬» ¿²¼ ³¿·²¬¿·² ¿² ±²¹±·²¹ ª··¾·´·¬§ ¬± ®»·¼»²¬ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ®»¹«´¿® ª··¬¿¬·±² ¬± Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ ´±²¹ ¬»®³ ½¿®» º¿½·´·¬·»ò Ì¸» »ºº»½¬ ±º ½«³«´¿¬·ª» ª··¬¿¬·±²ô ¿¬ «²¿²²±«²½»¼ ¬·³» ¬¸®±«¹¸±«¬ ¿ §»¿®ô ®¿·» ¬¸» ´»ª»´ ±º ¬¿ºº ¿½½±«²¬¿¾·´·¬§ ¬± ½¿®» º±® ¿´´ ±º ¬¸» ®»·¼»²¬ò Ë´¬·³¿¬»´§ ¬¸» ¹±¿´ ±º «½¸ ª··¬ · ¬¸» ·³°®±ª»³»²¬ ±º ¬¸» ¯«¿´·¬§ ±º ½¿®» ¿²¼ ´·º» ·² ¬¸¿¬ º¿½·´·¬§ Ý»®¬·º·»¼ ÔÌÝ Ñ³¾«¼³»² °®±ª·¼» »®ª·½» ©·¬¸ ®»°»½¬ º±® ¸«³¿² ¼·¹²·¬§ ¿²¼ ¬¸» ·²¼·ª·¼«¿´·¬§ ±º ¬¸» ®»·¼»²¬ «²®»¬®·½¬»¼ ¾§ ½±²·¼»®¿¬·±² ±º ¿¹»ô ±½·¿´ ±® »½±²±³·½ ¬¿¬«ô . °»®±²¿´ ½¸¿®¿½¬»®·¬·½ ±® ´·º»¬§´» ¬± ®»·¼»²¬ ±º ´·½»²»¼ ´±²¹ ¬»®³ ½¿®» º¿½·´·¬·» Ñ³¾«¼³¿² »®ª·½» ¿®» º®»» ¿²¼ ½±²º·¼»²¬·¿´ò FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION DATE: __________________ February 12, 2010 Application Instructions Sheet Please refer to the for details on the following questions. Please limit your answers to one paragraph per question 1) Saratoga Area Senior CoordinatingCouncil(SASCC) Applicant Name: P.O. Box 3033, 19655 Allendale Avenue, Saratoga, CA, 95070 Agency Address: Susan Huff Executive Director: ________________________________________ 408-868-1255408-868-9546 Phone: Fax: E-Mail: shuff@sascc.org __X__ Agency isaFaith Based Organization:____YesNo 2) Saratoga Adult Care Center(ACC) Program Title: 19655 Allendale Avenue, Saratoga, CA, 95070 Program Address: Susan Huff , Managing Director Contact Person/Title: 408-868-1255408-868-9546 Phone:Fax:E-Mail: shuff@sascc.org 3) $37,000 City of Saratoga grant funds requested this year (FY10/11): 4) $35,000 in 09/10; $34,000 in City of Saratoga/CDBG funds requested in the past: 08/09; $33,000 in 07/08; $37,284 in 06/07; $36,288 in 05/06; $36,288 in 04/05; 36,737 in 03/04; $35,667 in 02/03; $35,500 in 01/02 $36,203in 09/10;$32,000 in City of Saratoga/CDBG funds received in the past: 08/09; $32,000 in 07/08; $33,000 in 06/07; $36,681 in 05/06; $36,288 in 04/05; $35,366 in 03/04; $35,667 in 02/03; $34,500 in 01/02 5) Programdescription and number of unduplicated clients served: Saratoga Adult Care Center is a Social Adult Day Program, whichseeks to enhance the quality of life for area seniors via specific, ongoing supportive services, made available to lower-income participants. The programserves residents of Saratoga and the surrounding communities of Campbell, West San Jose and Santa ClaraProgram participants require assistance to . ( complete ADLs and IADLsactivities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living) in addition to supervision and care management to promote safety, well-being, and longevity in their home environment. Participation in our program promotes expanded opportunity for individualized socialization, structured activities, physical activity and adaptive exercise, and care management and resources in regards to difficult behaviors, nutrition, and personal care. Individual care plans are created for each participant to optimize their benefits from participating in our program. In addition tothese core services, we provide support, respite, and resources to families and caregivers. The program is open Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. to meetthe needs of caregivers who workoutside the homeor need respite for other reasons. Requests to help fund this program are made because it serves mostly very low to moderate-income seniors. Feesare determined byan individual’s ability to pay, (i.e. a sliding scale), requiring supplemental funds from outside sources. Adult Day Care FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION Services are an ideal way to care for the needs of frail seniors, often eliminating the need for institutionalized care, which can substantially reduce the cost for families and the community as a whole.On an average year the Saratoga ACC will serve a minimum of 50 unduplicated clients.At the halfway mark of the current fiscal year(09-10), already 21of those clients reside in Saratoga. 6) Programpurpose and objectives: The purpose of the Saratoga Adult Care Center is to enhance the quality of life for Saratoga and surrounding area seniors via specific, ongoing supportive services, made available to lower-income participants. The overall goal is to prevent or delay the institutionalization of severely disabled adults & seniors, enable them to remain in their homes for as long as possible, improve the quality of life for the participants; and to improve the quality of life for caregivers via support andrespite. These services incorporate the following objectives: (1)Provide daily respite careto up to 24frail and less independent participants from the West Valley Area of Santa Clara County. (2)Prevent or delay institutionalization of individuals who require considerable personal assistance. (3)Provide socialization, instruction and structured activities such as exercise, crafts, skill development and nutritious meals daily for the less independent elderly in a licensed care facility. (4)Continue to facilitate caregiver support groups twice monthly in cooperation with the Alzheimer’s Association and provide similarsupport services to local churches and civic organizations of the West Valley area. (5)Provide respite and improve quality of life for caregivers and eliminate or delay the high emotional and financial cost of custodial care. (6)Continue utilizing volunteer services to help contain Center costs. (7)Maintain minimumenrollment of approximately 380participants each month. (8)Increase funding base through local resources, participant fees and fund raising events in an effort to reduce dependence on City and county funding. Due to the low-income status of the population served and the service-intensive nature of the program, becoming self-supporting is not feasibleat this time. As stated above, the overall goal is to prevent or delay the institutionalization of the frail elderly, enable them to remain in their homes for as long as possible and improve the quality of life for the participants and their caregivers. This has remained our goal throughout our programs history and previous Saratoga CBDG funds havehelped us achieve and maintain that goal along with the high quality of service that we provide to our clients. Our utilization demonstrates and validates the need and demand for our unique services. Our accomplishments over the past year, reached with the help of Saratoga CBDG funds are: FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION Supported all of the Adult Care’s ongoing efforts mentioned above to support families and participants Allowed for the continuous operation of all of our programs, including our exercise and music programs, during the summer months when they are not subsidized by West Valley College. Helped us to avoid further draws from our investment account which suffered tremendous loss this past year. This will enable our funds to further grow to help sustain SASCC for the future. Helped us to maintain oursocial worker and support groups to further assist families of Adult Care. Prevented any reduction of staff or staff hours, so we could continue all of the programs and services for our clients. Allowed us to host more social events for our members. 7) Programmanagement: Both divisions, the Saratoga Adult Care Center and The Saratoga Senior Center are governed by the SASCC Board of Directors. Additionally, the Executive Director is responsible for and works closely with both division managers and staff. AProgram Managerand Assistant Program Manager/Social Worker areresponsible for the day-to-day operations of the Adult Care Center and reportdirectly to the Executive Director. The Center employs two full-time and five part-time employees, (Program Manager, Program Assistants,Assistant Program Manager/Social Worker) providing services of approximately 8,000 hours per year. The Program Management teamoversees activities;the intake, care-planning, and evaluation components, entertainment and projects. They areresponsible for scheduling all activities, special events and classes for theparticipants. They direct the center, lead many of the activities and overseethe Administrative Assistant, Social Worker, and the Program Assistantswho also run activities and assist participants with projects, meals, toileting and any other special needs that may arise. Along with the ExecutiveDirector and the Social Worker, the Program Manager evaluates the needs of new potential clients, develops care plans, maintains ongoing progress reports, and works with families. The program provides exercise routines, memory training and stimulation through travelogues, crafts, music, a variety of entertainment, current events, discussions and directed conversation. Special adaptive exercises and physical skill training are focused on participants who need help with any disabilities (e.g. stroke, aphasia, Parkinson’s).Healthy snacksare provided and full nutritious meals are served daily prepared by the Saratoga-Los Gatos Assistance League. Volunteers and instructors assigned by West Valley College augment the activities and help keep expenses at a minimum. All of the staff at the Saratoga Adult Care Centerarehighly trained, each with many years of experience working with frail elders. Twenty volunteers supplement the sevenpaid FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION staff and provide between 575 to 700 hours of service annually.The ExecutiveDirector, Program Manager, and Social Worker also maintain strong public relations with local, county and state senior organizations and participate in required trainings. They are involved with public speaking engagements, organizational networking and other important community events. These efforts have resulted in a highly visible program where there is frequently a waiting list for prospective participants. 8) Agency description and experience: The Saratoga Adult Care Center (ACC) is a major program component of the Saratoga Area Senior Coordinating Council (SASCC) incorporated as a non-profit organization in 1979. SASCC also operates the Saratoga Senior Center for more active, independent older adults. Recognizing the needs of the aging population, supported by a community assessment, SASCC opened the Saratoga Adult Care Center in January of 1988 as the first facility in Santa Clara County designed and built specifically as an adult care center. It provides much needed respite for caregivers and promotes a higher quality of life for the participants at much less cost to both family members and public agencies. The Saratoga Adult Care Center has steadily increased in number of days open from two at the onset to five full days weekly by February 1994. During this time, the average number of families served monthly increased from 9 to 42at any one time, with well over 350 visits by participants each month. This increased utilization validates the need and demand for the service. Thecenter serves approximately 18-22participants per day. This assures each participant ampleone-on-one time with our assistants and volunteers. Participants come from thesurrounding areas of the West Valley Corridor, including Saratoga, Los Gatos, Santa Clara, Campbell, San Jose, Mt.View, Sunnyvale and Cupertino. The Adult Care Center provides licensed, direct care and social adult daycare activities for severely disabled adults and less independent seniors as well as resources, supportand referralsto their caregivers. The daily program offers individualized and structured activities, adaptive exercise and movement taught by West Valley College instructors and a retired physical therapist, entertainment and education opportunities, basic health monitoring, assistance with daily tasks, and assistance with personal care and hygiene. The nutrition program includes a lunch meal and two snacks. Meals are prepared on-site with fresh, seasonal ingredients. We are able to provide low-sugar, low-fat, and portion-controlled meals as necessary. Providing a nutrition program supports health maintenance and a participant’s ability to “age in place”; providing one meal during the day can reduce the burden caregivers may feel in planning and preparing meals. Individual care planning, family support and collaboration with healthcare professionals and/or social service professionals is provided for participants and family caregivers (“caretakers”). Additional services include family counseling through care plan meetings, community resource referrals, and a monthly caregiver meeting to discuss care strategies, FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION provide a forumfor discussion about care-giving issues, and support caregivers in being informed about care options. Collaboration with other community-based organizations and transportation services, through Outreach para-transit maximize the benefit to our clients, family caregivers, and community members. The SASCC Mission Statement is included in this document. Audit information: The firm of LMGW, Certified Public Accountants, performs annual 9) . audits and reviews (every other year) at a cost to our organizationPlease find attached a copy of our last Audited Financial Statements for the year ending June 30, 2009. 10) Sources of funds anticipated for this project:_________________________________ SOURCEESTIMATESTATUS $37,000Submitted and Pending Saratoga CDBG Grant $ 5,000Submitted January 29, 2010 Campbell CDBG Grant $25,000First time submission Jan. 2010 San Jose CDBG Grant $165,000Ongoing Fees $4,200Receiving monthly checks St. Andrews $9,000Ongoing Donations, restricted Fundraising Events&$14,000Ongoing Appeals $258,400 Total: 11) Budget: Pleaseuse the attached worksheet. 12)Performance Measurements: Pleaseuse the attached worksheet. 13) Outreach: a) How SASCC informs Saratoga residents about its ACCprogram: Tofulfill SASCC’s Community Outreach Initiative the agencyinforms Saratoga residents about its programs through several different outreach methods. Approximately 750 copies of the agency’s newsletter that details all of the activities and programs at SASCC is sent out 12 times (monthly) per year to each member household and an additional resource list of100, including churches, other senior centers, the local Chamber of Commerce, retirement communities and assisted living centers, libraries, local businesses, and other nonprofits supporting seniors. The agency also promotes its activities, programs and events through articles in the City FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION Newsletter, the Saratogan,the Community newspaper, Saratoga Village Community network, the Saratoga News and SASCC’supdated website at www.sascc.org. SASCC has also developed a brochure for the public that describes its programs and outlines itshistory, mission and volunteer opportunities. The brochure is given out in response to all new inquiries. The Executive Director and members of our Board of Directors and Advisory Committee also advocate and conduct outreach through networking to a broad range of community organizations including Asian-American groups,Indian-American groups, the Rotary Club, Kiwanis, Lions, Healthcare libraries, area recreation centers In addition, our Director is aligning with several peer organizations with the intention of collaborating for the benefit of seniors. She is also reaching out to local schools in hopes ofestablishing and growing inter-generational relationships. The target groups for outreach include: Asian-American and Indian-American familieswhich constitute approximately 30% of the population of Saratoga and have recently begun to participate inthe Senior Center; Other elders in Saratoga that are not SASCC members; Seniorsthat have joined SASCC but seldom participate in activities Family members of participants or potential participants. Other senior oriented organizations Schools Our staff works closely with other like agencies for referrals which is mutually beneficial. Another important method of outreach is the many health screenings, free workshops and seminars that we host on a range of issues including legal matters, nutrition, flu shots, Eastern Medicine, vision and hearing screenings, insurance matters, etc. In addition the agency hosts many social activities to appeal to a broad range of interests. b) Additional outreach efforts SASCC will use to attract new Saratoga residents and sources drawn on to implement this outreach: SASCC will continue to focus on reaching out to all prevalent ethnicities in the community.We have built a good relationship with Indian-American community leaders and are working to turn ideas into plansfor reaching their constituent elders. Several suggestions which we plan to explore in order to better market our programs more broadly in the Saratoga community are: create ethnic-familiar programs where a pre-set group is already present so that new invitees will be more comfortable. For example: an intergenerational Indian-themed potluck where this community will talk about what programs they would like to see; distribute brochures and event material at the local Farmers Market, develop more FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION targetedsectionsin our Newsletter; and place articles in various ethnic community newspapers. In addition, further rangeSASCC plans to have a broader distribution of its brochures through household mailings to every household in Saratoga. To achieve the above,SASCC plans to redesign its brochure in line with its website,producing a very professional and cohesive marketing message. The agency has implementedand will be updating a new Member Resource Services program that will provide a broader range of assistances to seniors and their caregivers. Last year welaunched and now regularly meet with outBlue Ribbon Task Force (BRTF) committeemembers.This is a group of15 highly proven, talented community leaders from a variety of backgrounds who have committed to help us move SASCC to the next step. Thesevolunteers are now equipped with a background of information. We have produced on online survey to assess from area seniors their needs and wants in programs. The first results were very helpful and we intend to re-launch the survey to a larger audience. InMarch, we will be launching our next big project: the Business Alliance Program (BAP). This is something that we intended to launch last fiscal year but determined that it did not make sense with the market conditions at that time. With this project will are seeking to identify and align with local area businesses who are interested in the welfare of the area seniors. The program is multi-leveled where a business owner may choose to sponsor SASCC, offer discounts to its members, or both. We anticipate that the efforts put into this program will grow over time into something of tremendous mutual benefit to SASCC members and our business community. The added benefit will of course be a growth in membership which will provide additional fees. We will continue to focuson fewer but larger and more efficient fund-raising events in 2010. c) The number of additional Saratoga residents ACC has served since SASCC applied for previous funding in 2008-2009: Ten new familiesof thehave been served since the application for previous funding, along with the 11 that we continue to servefor a total of 21. 14) Leveraging: a) Total Amount of Funding Requested from All Organizations This Year: OrganizationDate Funds Amount RequestedPercentage of Total RequestedCost Saratoga CDBGFebruary 12, 2010$36,20013% Campbell CDBGJanuary 29, 2010$5,0002% San Jose CDBGJanuary 5, 2010$25,0009% St. AndrewsJuly 2009$4,2001.5% Dorothy FundTBA$3,0001% FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION Rotary & KiwanisTBA$6,0002% I am researching more opportunities. b) Total Amount of Funding Received from All OrganizationsLast Year: OrganizationType of FundingAmount ReceivedPercentage of Total Cost Saratoga CDBGFederal Grant$36,20015% Campbell CDBGFederal Grant$4,0002% Saratoga RotaryGrant$3,7001.5% St AndrewsDonation$4,2002% Health TrustGrant$500 Dorothy FundPrivate donors$6,5003% 15) Cost / Benefit Analysis: We are requesting $37,000to support a portion ofthetotal operating costs of the Saratoga Adult Care Center program. Per the attached budget, operating costs include salaries, benefits, member programs and classes, food, supplies,training,audits, insurance, and necessary licenses and memberships. With intensive volunteer and fundraising efforts, this program creatively stretches its revenues. The budget is tightly controlled and the Finance Committee, the Board of Directors and the Executive Director review expenses monthly. Rent, utilities, and janitorial servicesare provided in-kind by the City of Saratoga. The City’s support remains as a significant factor in our organization’s success. Currently, 66%of the participants in the Adult Care Center have low or very-low incomes. On average, their daily payments are subsidized by $30.00. With the efficient use of limited resources, the cost of the program is factored at $11 perhour per participant. This is considerably less than in-home or nursing care for an individual who might otherwise require public support. Funds are requested from the City of Saratoga to partially underwrite the programs ad services to our participants. Total Program Total Clients Cost Per ClientFunding Percentage of CostServedRequested Total Cost $275,931(51families $5,410.00$37,00014% unduplicated per year) FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION 16) Target Beneficiaries: Saratoga Percentage of Low-Income Percentage of Total Residents Served*Total ClienteleClients ServedClientele 2141%Saratoga: 13Sarat: 38%of 34 low Total : 34income total Sarat: 27% of Total clients * 2008-2009 The number of Saratoga residents served is 21 out of a total of 51clients or 41% of our total number of clients. The total number of Low Income clients that we serve from all locations is 34 out of 51or 66%. The total number of Low Income clients from Saratogais 13or 62% ofour Saratoga resident clientele, and 27% of our total number of clients. SARATOGA AREA SENIOR COORDINATING COUNCIL MISSION STATEMENT The purpose of the Saratoga Area Senior Coordinating Council isto provide quality services to local seniors of all ages, abilities,religions, social and economic backgrounds. Our primaryobjective is to involve community groups and individuals in seniorrelated issues, to develop community responsibility, advocacy forproblems facing our aging population, to assure that the needs ofolder adults are met and to improve the overall quality of their lives. BUDGET AGENCY NAME: Saratoga Area Senior Coordinating Council Date Prepared: February 12, 2010 PROGRAMNAME: Saratoga Adult Care Center SPECIFIC ACTIVITIESBUDGET AMOUNT PROPOSED PROJECT ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENSES Personnel Services$198,248. Fringe Benefits$22,221. Fundraising($4K of this was expensing 09-10 grant)$3,000. Office Supplies$2,000. Communication/Marketing$5,200. Printing& Advertising$2,400. Program Supplies$1,549. Program Food$23,720. Administrative Costs$3,775. Insurance$6,768. Audit$5,000. Equipment Rental/Maintenance$2,050. Total Operating Expenses$275,931 PROPOSED PROJECT ANNUAL OPERATING REVENUES CDBG Funds (Saratoga, Campbell, San Jose)$66,200 Other Funds$13,200 Fees$165,000 Fundraising revenues-to be further developed$14,000 Draw from investment fund$17,531. Total Operating Revenue$275,931 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS AGENCY NAME:Saratoga Area Senior Coordinating Council Date Prepared: February 12, 2010 PROGRAMNAME: Saratoga Adult Care Center PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT WORKSHEET GOAL: The Adult Care Center seeks toenhance the quality of life for Saratoga Area Seniors via specific, ongoing supportive services, made available to lower-income participants, to help keep the frail adult in his/her home & community and to provide respite to caregivers, regardless of income. OBJECTIVE (1):OUTCOME (1): For FY 2010-2011 the Adult Care Center will To serve and improve the quality of life on a provide over 8,000 hours of paid services to a day to day basis for 51unduplicated clients minimum of 51participants (clients) over a one and their families. year period. OBJECTIVE (2):OUTCOME (2): For FY 2010-2011the Adult Care Center will Maintain client days at a minimum of380in maintain a realistic balance of client days in each quarter. each quarter to support programs. FY 2009-2010CITY OF SARATOGA CDBGSUPPLEMENTAL Name of Applicant Organization: _Saratoga Area Senior Coordinating Council________ Name of Program:__Saratoga Adult Care Center_____________ Please complete the following questionsin addition to the Standard Applicationto determine additional requirements for CDBG eligibility: 1.Please complete the following tableswith the number of recipients for each category: Number of Unduplicated BeneficiariesNumber of Urban County unduplicated beneficiaries at or below 2 current county-wide median income CityNo. Campbell5 Income CategoryNo. Other2 0-30% (Extremely low)17 Santa Clara2 31-50% (Very Low)8 Los Gatos3 51-80% (Low)9 San Jose12 Cupertino1 Sunnyvale2 Saratoga21 Unincorporated Santa Clara County Outside the Urban County 1 3 51 Total unduplicated beneficiaries 2.How does the purpose and objectives of the proposed program meet the Urban County’s CDBG funding objectives with regard to either the Urban County Priority Needsor the Urban County Non- 3 Housing Community Development Needs as described in the Consolidated Plan? The purposes and objectives of SASCC’s Adult Care Program are directly related to the Urban County Non-Housing Community Development Needs which specify that there are needs for supportingthe operating expenses of organizations which provide supportive services “which address the needs of the frail elderly or persons with disabilities.” The critical need for these aging focused services is discussed in the “Community for a Lifetime” Executive Summary of the strategic plan co-sponsored by the City of San Jose and the County of Santa Clara in February 2005: “In 2005, there were more than 200,000 older adults living in Santa 1The Urban County includes the unincorporated portions of the County of Santa Clara and the cities of Campbell, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, and Saratoga. 2Based on the attached FY 2008 HUD Income Limits for Santa Clara County 3Consolidated Planis available online at http://www.saratoga.ca.us/by The 2005-2010 Urban County clicking on the CDBG grant link under InThe Spotlighton the right hand side of the webpage FY 2009-2010CITY OF SARATOGA CDBGSUPPLEMENTAL Clara County. By 2020, this number will double and older adults will represent more than 1 out of every 5 individuals in SCC. By 2050 the average life expectancy is projected to be 87 years for women (currently 80) and 81 for men (currently 74). SCC Supervisor Don Gage, in a 2007 community assessment, stated that “By 2020, the number of people…who are 60 and older will have almost doubled….a growth rate 3 to 4 times faster than the county’s overall population. It’s important to determine the needs…now so we can ensure effective aging services are in place in the future.” prevent or delay institutionalization of the frail elderly, to enable them Through our program we work to to remain in their homes for as long as possible and to improve the quality of life for the participants and their caregivers. The purpose of the Center is to meet the growing need for this service which will only accelerate as the population ages. Independent studies show that by the year 2010, Santa Clara County’s population of individuals 85 years of age and over is expected to double resulting in an increased need for services such as ours. Public Facility Senior Our services apply to the HUD Development Community Needs categories of Centers as our program is open to all and housed in a public Saratoga City public building and also to Public Senior Services which is rankedas a “High” priority need. FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION th DATE: February 9, 2010 Application Instructions Sheet Please refer to the for details on the following questions. Please limit your answers to one paragraph per question 1) Applicant Organization/Agency Name: West Valley Community Services (WVCS) Agency Address: 10104 Vista Drive Cupertino 95014 Executive Director: Naomi Nakano-Matsumoto Phone: 408-255-8033 x 301Fax: 408-366-6090 E-Mail: naomin@wvcommunityservices.org Agency is a Faith Based Organization: ____ Yes _X__ No 2) Program Title : Comprehensive Emergency Assistance Program (CEAP) Program Address: 10104 Vista Drive Cupertino 95014_ Contact Person/Title: Sujatha Venkatraman Phone: Fax: E-Mail: 408-255-8033 x 103408-366-6090 sujathav@wvcommunityservices.org 3) City of Saratoga grant funds requested in the past: $15,164 4) City of Saratoga grant funds received in the past: $15,164 5) Program description and number of unduplicated clients served: ÉÊÝÍ · ¬¸» ±²´§ µ²±©² ½±³³«²·¬§ó¾¿»¼ ±®¹¿²·¦¿¬·±² °®±ª·¼·²¹ ¿º»¬§ ²»¬ ¿²¼ ½±³°®»¸»²·ª» ©®¿°ó ¿®±«²¼ º¿³·´§ «°°±®¬ »®ª·½» ·² ¬¸» É»¬ Ê¿´´»§ ¿®»¿ò ÉÊÝÍ »®ª» êÜËÜÉÎÖÜ ô Ô± Ù¿¬±ô Ó±²¬» Í»®»²±ô Ý«°»®¬·²±ô ¿²¼ ©»¬ Í¿² Ö±»ò Ì¸» ¿½¬·ª·¬·» ±º ¬¸» Ý±³°®»¸»²·ª» Û³»®¹»²½§ ß·¬¿²½» Ð®±¹®¿³ ¿®»æ Ý¿» ³¿²¿¹»³»²¬ Ý¿» Ó¿²¿¹»® °®±ª·¼» ·²¬¿µ» ¿²¼ ¿»³»²¬ ±º ¸±«»¸±´¼ ²»»¼ô ®»º»® ½´·»²¬ ¬± ¿°°®±°®·¿¬» »®ª·½» ¬± ³»»¬ «½¸ ²»»¼ ·º ²±¬ ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» ·²ó¸±«»ô ¿²¼ ®»½»®¬·º§ ½´·»²¬ ¿ ²»½»¿®§ ø³·²·³«³ ±²» ®»½»®¬·º·½¿¬·±² °»® §»¿®÷ò ß ¬¸» ½¿» ³¿²¿¹»® ½±²¼«½¬ ¬¸» ·²¬¿µ»ô ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ °®±¹®¿³ «½¸ ¿ º±±¼ ¬¿³°ô ¼·½±«²¬ «¬·´·¬·» ¿²¼ ½¸·´¼ ½¿®» ¿®» ¼·½«»¼ò ×º ¿ ½´·»²¬ ¼±» ²±¬ ¯«¿´·º§ º±® ½¿¸ ¿·¬¿²½»ô ¬¸» ½¿» ³¿²¿¹»® ³¿µ» ®»º»®®¿´ ¿²¼ ¸»´° ¬¸» ½´·»²¬ ½±²·¼»® ±¬¸»® ±°¬·±² ¿ ±´«¬·±²ò Ú±±¼ °¿²¬®§ ß´´ ¯«¿´·º·»¼ ½´·»²¬ ©·´´ ¸¿ª» ¿½½» ¬± ¬¸» º±±¼ °¿²¬®§ ·² ±®¼»® ¬± «°°´»³»²¬ ¿²¼ ¬¿¾·´·¦» ¹®±½»®§ »¨°»²»ò Ûª»®§ ª··¬ ¬± ¬¸» º±±¼ °¿²¬®§ ·²½´«¼» º®»¸ º®«·¬ ¿²¼ ª»¹»¬¿¾´»ô º®»¸ ¾®»¿¼ô »¹¹ô ¬±®¬·´´¿ô ¿ ±«®½» ±º °®±¬»·²ô ¿²¼ ³·´µô ©¸»² ³·´µ · ¿ª¿·´¿¾´»ô ±«®½»¼ º®±³ Í»½±²¼ Ø¿®ª»¬ Ú±±¼ Þ¿²µ ¿²¼ ¹»²»®±« ¼±²¿¬·±² º®±³ ´±½¿´ ¹®±½»®§ ¬±®» «½¸ ¿ Í¿º»©¿§ ¿²¼ É¸±´» Ú±±¼ò Ý¿¸ ¿·¬¿²½»æ Î»²¬ ¿²¼ «¬·´·¬§ ¿·¬¿²½» · °®±ª·¼»¼ îì ¬± ìè ¸±«® ¿º¬»® ¿°°®±ª¿´ô °¿§¿¾´» ¼·®»½¬´§ ¬± ª»²¼±®ò Ý¸»½µ ¿®» ²»ª»® ³¿¼» °¿§¿¾´» ¬± ¿ ½´·»²¬ò Û³»®¹»²½§ ½¿¸ ¿·¬¿²½» ¯«¿´·º·½¿¬·±² »³»®¹»²½§ Û×ÌÝ ¿²¼ Ê×Ìß ¿·¬¿²½» Ì¸» Û×ÌÝñÊ×Ìß Ý¿» ³¿²¿¹»® ½±±®¼·²¿¬» ½»®¬·º·»¼ ª±´«²¬»»® ¿²¼ ±²·¬» º¿½·´·¬·» ¬± ¿·¬ ½´·»²¬ °®»°¿®» ¿²¼ º·´» ¬¸»·® ¬¿¨» ·² ¬¸» ¸±°» ¬¸¿¬ ¿ ´¿®¹»® ®»º«²¼ ©·´´ ¸»´° ³»»¬ »ª»®§¼¿§ ²»»¼ ¿²¼ ¾«·´¼ ¿ ¿ª·²¹ ¿½½±«²¬ò Ú·²¿²½·¿´ Ó¿²¿¹»³»²¬ ©±®µ¸±° ¬± ·²½®»¿» º·²¿²½·¿´ ´·¬»®¿½§ µ·´´ ¿²¼ ·²¼·ª·¼«¿´ º·²¿²½·¿´ ³¿²¿¹»³»²¬ ½±«²»´·²¹ò FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION Î¿··²¹óßóØ»¿´¬¸§ Û¿¬»®æ Ì¸» ¹±¿´ ±º Î¿··²¹óßóØ»¿´¬¸§ Û¿¬»® · ¬± ·²¬®±¼«½» ½´·»²¬ ¬± ²»© º±±¼ ½®»¿¬·ª» ¿²¼ ²«¬®·¬·±« ±´«¬·±² º±® ¬¸»·® º¿³·´·» ¿²¼ ¬¸» ¼·²²»® ¬¿¾´»ò Ì¸· ²»© °®±¹®¿³ °®±³±¬» ¿ ¸±´·¬·½ ·²¬»¹®¿¬»¼ ¿°°®±¿½¸ ¬± ²«¬®·¬·±² ¿²¼ ¯«¿´·¬§ ±º ´·º»ò 6) Program purpose and objectives: Ì¸» Ý±³°®»¸»²·ª» Û³»®¹»²½§ ß·¬¿²½» Ð®±¹®¿³ øÝÛßÐ÷ ©·´´ ½±²¬·²«» ¬± °®±ª·¼» ¾¿·½ ¸«³¿² ²»»¼ ¿²¼ »³»®¹»²½§ »®ª·½» ¬± ´±©ó·²½±³» º¿³·´·»ô »²·±®ô ¿²¼ ·²¹´» ¿¼«´¬ ·² Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ ¾§ °®»ª»²¬·²¹ ¸«²¹»®ô »ª·½¬·±²ô ¿²¼ «¬·´·¬§ ¸«¬ó±ººò Ï«¿´·º·»¼ Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ ½´·»²¬ ®»½»·ª» »®ª·½» ¿ó²»»¼»¼ô ®»«´¬·²¹ ·² ³±®» ¬¿¾´» ³±²¬¸´§ ·¬«¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ³±®» ¬¿¾´» ´·ª»ò É®¿° ¿®±«²¼ »®ª·½» ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» ¬± ¿´´ ¬¸»³ ·²½´«¼» º·²¿²½·¿´ ³¿²¿¹»³»²¬ô ³»²¬¿´ ¸»¿´¬¸ »®ª·½»ô ²«¬®·¬·±² ½´¿»ô ¿²¼ °»½·¿´ »¿±²¿´ °®±¹®¿³ò ÝÛßÐ ¹±¿´ · ¬± »²«®» ¬¸¿¬ ´±©ó·²½±³» »²·±®ô ·²¹´» ¿¼«´¬ô ¿²¼ º¿³·´·» ·² Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ ¸¿ª» ½±²¬·²«»¼ ¿½½» ¬± ¾¿·½ ¸«³¿² ²»»¼ »®ª·½»ô ·²½´«¼·²¹ ¿½½» ¬± ¿² ¿¼»¯«¿¬» ¯«¿²¬·¬§ ±º ¯«¿´·¬§ º±±¼ ¿²¼ ¿·¬¿²½» ©·¬¸ ®»²¬ô ¼»°±·¬ô ±® «¬·´·¬§ °¿§³»²¬ô ¿²¼ ·²¬»²¼ ¬± ·³°®±ª» ¬¸» ±ª»®¿´´ ½±³³«²·¬§ ½±²¼·¬·±² ¾§ °®±ª·¼·²¹ ±«¬®»¿½¸ô ¼·®»½¬ »®ª·½» ¿²¼ ½¿» ³¿²¿¹»³»²¬ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ¿ °´¿²²»¼ ½±«®» ±º ¿½¬·±²ò 7) Program management: Ì± »²«®» ¬¸±®±«¹¸ ¿²¼ ½±³°®»¸»²·ª» »®ª·½» ¬± »¨¬®»³»´§ó´±© ¬± ´±©ó·²½±³» ®»·¼»²¬ô ¬¸» ·²¬¿µ» ½»®¬·º·½¿¬» º±® ¿²§ ½¸·´¼®»²ò Î»½»®¬·º·½¿¬·±² · ½±²¼«½¬»¼ ¿²²«¿´´§ò Ì¸» ³¿²¿¹»³»²¬ ±º ¬¸» ÝÛßÐ · ·²¬»¹®¿¬»¼ ¿²¼ »¿½¸ ¬¿ºº ³»³¾»® · ½®±ó¬®¿·²»¼ ¬± »²«®» ½±²·¬»²¬ ¿²¼ ¯«¿´·¬§ »®ª·½»ò Û³°´±§»» ¿²¼ ª±´«²¬»»® ¿®» ®»°®»»²¬¿¬·ª» ±º ¬¸» ½´·»²¬»´» »®ª»¼ ¿²¼ °»¿µ ³¿²§ ±º ¬¸» ½´·»²¬ ´¿²¹«¿¹»ò Ì¸®»» °±·¬·±² ¬¿ºº ¬¸· °®±¶»½¬ô Ý¿» Ó¿²¿¹»®ô Ñ°»®¿¬·±² Ó¿²¿¹»®ô Ð®±¹®¿³ Ü·®»½¬±®ò ×²óµ·²¼ °±·¬·±² ·²½´«¼» Í¿² Ö±» Í¬¿¬» Ë²·ª»®·¬§ô Ý±´´»¹» ±º Í±½·¿´ É±®µ ×²¬»®² ¿²¼ ½±³³«²·¬§ ª±´«²¬»»®ò 8) Agency description and experience: ÉÊÝÍ · ¿ °®·ª¿¬» ²±²ó°®±º·¬ô ½±³³«²·¬§ ¾¿»¼ ¿¹»²½§ ¬¸¿¬ ¸¿ ¾»»² °®±ª·¼·²¹ ¼·®»½¬ ¿·¬¿²½» ¿²¼ ®»º»®®¿´ »®ª·½» ¬± ¬¸» ½±³³«²·¬§ º±® ³±®» ¬¸¿² íê §»¿®ò ÉÊÝÍ °®±ª·¼» ¿ ½±²¬·²««³ ±º ¾¿·½ ²»»¼ô º¿³·´§ »®ª·½» ¿²¼ ¸±«·²¹ »®ª·½» ·²½´«¼·²¹æ ·²º±®³¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ®»º»®®¿´ô º±±¼ô ½´±¬¸·²¹ô ¸»´¬»®ô ¿ºº±®¼¿¾´» ¸±«·²¹ô º·²¿²½·¿´ ¿·¬¿²½»ô ¿²¼ ½¿» ³¿²¿¹»³»²¬ò ÉÊÝÍ »®ª» ¬¸» É»¬ Ê¿´´»§ ½±³³«²·¬·» ±º Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ô Ô± Ù¿¬±ô Ó±²¬» Í»®»²±ô Ý«°»®¬·²±ô ¿²¼ É»¬ Í¿² Ö±»ò ×² ¬¸» °¿¬ º»© §»¿® ÉÊÝÍ ¸¿ ¿¼¼»¼ ±¬¸»® «°°±®¬·ª» »®ª·½» «½¸ ¿ º·²¿²½·¿´ »¼«½¿¬·±²ô ²«¬®·¬·±² °®±¹®¿³ô ³»²¬¿´ ¸»¿´¬¸ ½±«²»´·²¹ ¿²¼ ¬¸» Û×ÌÝñÊ×Ìß øÛ¿®²»¼ ×²½±³» Ì¿¨ Ý®»¼·¬ ñ Ê±´«²¬¿®§ ×²½±³» Ì¿¨ ß·¬¿²½»÷ °®±¹®¿³ò 9) Audit information: Ì¸» ¼¿¬» ±º ±«® ³±¬ ®»½»²¬ ¿«¼·¬ · Ñ½¬±¾»® ïèô îððç º±® Ú·½¿´ Ç»¿® îððèóîððçò Ì¸»®» ¿®» ²± º·²¼·²¹ò ¬¸ FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION 10) Sources of funds anticipated for this project: 2 SOURCEESTIMATED AMOUNTSTATUS Saratoga $ 20,000Application Pending Other Cities $ 97,827Application Pending Foundations $ 78,750Committed Donations $ 38,000Secured Federal (pending) $ 3,000Application Pending ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 237,577 11) Budget: Please use the attached worksheet. 12) Performance Measurements: Please use the attached worksheet. 13) Outreach: ÉÊÝÍ ½±²¼«½¬ ±«¬®»¿½¸ ·² ²«³»®±« ©¿§ò ÉÊÝÍ °®±¼«½» ¿ ¾·ó¿²²«¿´ ²»©´»¬¬»® ½¿´´»¼ É»¬ Ê¿´´»§ Ý±³³«²·¬§ ß½¬·±² Ò»©´»¬¬»® øÝßÒ÷ º±® ¿´´ ±º ±«® ½´·»²¬ô ¼±²±®ô º«²¼»®ô ª±´«²¬»»®ô ª»²¼±®ô ¿²¼ °¿®¬²»®ò É» ¼·¬®·¾«¬» ±«® ²»©´»¬¬»® ¿¬ ¸»¿´¬¸ñ½±³³«²·¬§ º¿·® ¿²¼ ¬¿¾´·²¹ »ª»²¬ ¬¸®±«¹¸±«¬ ¬¸» ½±³³«²·¬§ ¿ ©»´´ ¿ ¿¬ ¬¸» ½±´´¿¾±®¿¬·±² ³»»¬·²¹ ·² ©¸·½¸ ÉÊÝÍ °¿®¬·½·°¿¬»ò ÉÊÝÍ °´¿² ¬± °«¾´·¸ É»¬ Ê¿´´»§ ÝßÒ ¯«¿®¬»®´§ ¬¸· §»¿®ò ß´´ ÉÊÝÍ °«¾´·½¿¬·±² ¿®» ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» ±²´·²»ò Í¬¿ºº ¿²¼ ª±´«²¬»»® ©¿´µ»¼ ¬¸» ´±½¿´ ²»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼ô ¹±·²¹ ¼±±®ó¬±ó¼±±® ¬± ·²º±®³ ¬¸» ½±³³«²·¬§ ®»¹¿®¼·²¹ ¬¸» ¬§°» ±º »®ª·½» ¾»·²¹ ±ºº»®»¼ô ¸±© ¬¸»§ ½¿² »²®±´´ º±® »®ª·½»ô ±® ©¸¿¬ ¬¸»§ ½¿² ¼± ¬± ¸»´°ò ÉÊÝÍ ©±®µ ½´±»´§ ©·¬¸ ÝÞÑ »®ª·²¹ Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ ®»·¼»²¬ò ÉÊÝÍ ¸¿ ´±²¹ó¬¿²¼·²¹ ®»´¿¬·±²¸·° ©·¬¸ ¬¸» Ë²·¬»¼ É¿§ Í·´·½±² Ê¿´´»§ô Í»½±²¼ Ø¿®ª»¬ Ú±±¼ Þ¿²µô ´±½¿´ Î±¬¿®·»ô Õ·©¿²·ô Ô·±² ½´«¾ ¿²¼ ±¬¸»® »®ª·½» ¹®±«°ò ÉÊÝÍ ¿´± °´¿² ¬± ±«¬®»¿½¸ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» Ú¿·¬¸ ·² ß½¬·±² øÚ×ß÷ Ò»¬©±®µô ¿ ¹®±«° ±º §²¿¹±¹«» ¿²¼ ½¸«®½¸» ·² ¬¸» ½±³³«²·¬§ ¬± ¬¸»·® ½±²¹®»¹¿¬·±²ò 14) Leveraging: status 2009-10 TOTAL Foundations Ë²·¬»¼ É¿§ êìôððð îðïð Í¿´ª¿¬·±² ß®³§ ëðôððð ß²²«¿´´§ Ú×ÎÍÌ ë ïîçôëîë Ø±«·²¹ Ì®«¬ ïîôëðð ¿²²«¿´´§ Ñ¬¸»® Ú±«²¼¿¬·±² íðôððð ¿²²«¿´´§ Government Ú»¼»®¿´ ïêôððð ¿²²«¿´´§ ÚÛÓßñÛÚÍÐ Ú»¼»®¿´ èîôëíí ¿²²«¿´´§ ØËÜ Ý·¬§ ±º Ý«°»®¬·²± ïðïôèìì ¿²²«¿´´§ ÝÜÞÙ FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION Ý·¬§ ±º Ý«°»®¬·²± ïëôçðð ¿²²«¿´´§ Ù»²»®¿´ Ú«²¼ Ý·¬§ ±º Í¿² Ö±» éìôïðð ¿²²«¿´´§ ØÌÚ Ý·¬§ ±º Í¿² Ö±» ìîôèðé ¿²²«¿´´§ ÝÜÞÙ Ý·¬§ ±º Í¿² Ö±» ïèôëèï ¿²²«¿´´§ ÛÍÙ Ý·¬§ ±º Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ îðôððð ¿²²«¿´´§ Ù»²»®¿´ Ú«²¼ Ì±©² ±º Ô± Ù¿¬± ïíôððð ¿²²«¿´´§ Ø±«·²¹ Ì®«¬ Ý·¬§ ±º Í«²²§ª¿´» ïðôééì ¿²²«¿´´§ ÝÜÞÙ Cost / Benefit Analysis: ___________________________________________________ Total Total Cost Funding % Program Cost Clients Served Per Client Requested Total Cost $237,577 611 $389 $20,000 8% 16) Target Beneficiaries: _____________________________________________________ Saratoga % Total Low-Income % Residents served Clientele Clients Served Total Clientele 67 11% 611 100% BUDGET th AGENCY NAME: __ Date Prepared: West Valley Community ServicesFebruary 9 2010 PROGRAM NAME: _Comprehensive Emergency Assistance Program (CEAP) BUDGET WORKSHEET SPECIFIC Jul - Sep Oct - Dec Jan - Mar Apr - Jun ACTIVITIES SALARIES Personnel $2849.00 $2849.00 $2849.00 $2849.00 Benefits $ 684.00 $ 684.00 $ 684.00 $ 684.00 OFFICE EXPENSES Phone/Fax $ 372.00 $ 372.00 $ 372.00 $ 380.00 Travel $ 180.00 $ 180.00 $ 180.00 $ 180.00 utilities $ 615.00 $ 615.00 $ 615.00 $ 615.00 PROJECT EXPENSES Accounting $ $300.00 $ $300.00 $ $300.00 $ $300.00 TOTAL $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS th AGENCY NAME: Date Prepared: West Valley Community Services February 9 2010 PROGRAM NAME: Comprehensive Emergency Assistance Program (CEAP) PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT WORKSHEET GOAL: To increase the quality of life for lower income Saratoga residents by creating and/or maintaining household sustainability: prevent hunger, evictions, utility shut-offs and homelessness. OBJECTIVE (1): OUTCOME (1): Provide food on a weekly basis. By June 30, 2011, 100% of qualified Saratoga residents receiving food assistance will have food stability. 40 individuals to be served. OBJECTIVE (2): OUTCOME (2): Provide rental and/or utility assistance on a one-By June 30, 2011, 80% of recipients will state time only basis. that the assistance provided prevented eviction and/or utility shut-off. 10 individuals to be served. FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA CDBG SUPPLEMENTAL Name of Applicant Organization: __West Valley Community Services (WVCS) Name of Program: __Comprehensive Emergency Assistance Program (CEAP)_____________________ Please complete the following questions in addition to the Standard Application to determine additional requirements for CDBG eligibility: 1.Please complete the following tables with the number of recipients for each category: Number of Unduplicated Beneficiaries Number of Urban County unduplicated beneficiaries at or below current county-wide median income City No. Campbell 6 Income Category No. Los Altos 0-30% (Extremely low) 48 Los Altos Hills 31-50% (Very Low) 7 Los Gatos 245 51-80% (Low) 2 Monte Sereno 10 Morgan Hill Saratoga 127 Unincorporated Santa Clara County Outside the Urban County 1 11 399 Total unduplicated beneficiaries During the last fiscal year two grants from FIRST 5 Santa Clara County concluded. Those were not zip code restricted and we were serving all of Santa Clara County. That is the reason our numbers for other cities and communities are not included. 2.How does the purpose and objectives of s CDBG funding objectives with regard to either the Urban County Priority Needs or the Urban County Non- 3 Housing Community Development Needs as described in the Consolidated Plan? Increase the available supply of housing affordable to lower income households. Increase housing opportunities for special needs households and the un-housed. Homeless Services 1The Urban County includes the unincorporated portions of the County of Santa Clara and the cities of Campbell, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, and Saratoga. 2Based on the attached FY 2008 HUD Income Limits for Santa Clara County 3Consolidated Plan is available online at http://www.saratoga.ca.us/ by The 2005-2010 Urban County clicking on the CDBG grant link under In The Spotlight on the right hand side of the webpage County of Santa Clara Office of the County Executive Office of Affordable Housing 2310North First Street, Suite 100 San Jose, California 95131 ðè÷ ììïóìîëì ÚßÈ øìðè÷ ììïóìííî (4 Ú»¾®«¿®§ ïéô îðïð ÌÑæÛ³·´§ Ø¿®®·±² Ü»°«¬§ Ý±«²¬§ Û¨»½«¬·ª» ÚÎÑÓæ Ó¿®¶±®·» Ó¿¬¬¸»©ô Ü·®»½¬±® øÑ®·¹·²¿´ ·¹²»¼÷ Ñºº·½» ±º ßºº±®¼¿¾´» Ø±«·²¹ ÍËÞÖÛÝÌæÎÛÐÑÎÌ ßÒÜ ÎÛÝÑÓÓÛÒÜßÌ×ÑÒÍ ÚÑÎ ÍÌÎÛßÓÔ×Ò×ÒÙ ÌØÛ ËÎÞßÒ ÝÑËÒÌÇ ÝÜÞÙ ÐÎÑÙÎßÓ ×Ò îðïð ×ÒÌÎÑÜËÝÌ×ÑÒ Ì¸» º±´´±©·²¹ ®»°±®¬ ¿²¼ ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±² ¿®» ¬¸» ®»«´¬ ±º ¿ ½±³¾·²¿¬·±² ±º »ºº±®¬ ¾§ ¬¸» Ñºº·½» ±º ßºº±®¼¿¾´» Ø±«·²¹ øÑßØ÷ ¿²¼ ¿ ÝÜÞÙ É±®µ·²¹ Ù®±«° ·² ®»°±²» ¬± ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ Û¨»½«¬·ª» ¼·®»½¬·±² ¬± ®»¼«½» ¬¸» ½±¬ ¬± ¬¸» Ù»²»®¿´ Ú«²¼ ±º ¿¼³·²·¬»®·²¹ ¬¸» Ë®¾¿² Ý±«²¬§ ÝÜÞÙ Ð®±¹®¿³ò Ì¸» ¹±¿´ ©¿ ¬± ·¼»²¬·º§ ¿½¬·±² ¬± ®»¼«½» ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» ½±¬ ¬± ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ Ù»²»®¿´ Ú«²¼ ¾§ ¬®»¿³´·²·²¹ ¬¸» °®±¹®¿³ ±® ·²½®»¿·²¹ ®»ª»²«» º®±³ ²±²óÙ»²»®¿´ Ú«²¼ ±«®½»ò Ì¸» Ý±³³«²·¬§ Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬ Þ´±½µ Ù®¿²¬ øÝÜÞÙ÷ Ð®±¹®¿³ · °¿®¬ ±º ¬¸» ´¿®¹»® Ø±«·²¹ ¿²¼ Ý±³³«²·¬§ Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬ øØÝÜ÷ Ð®±¹®¿³ ¬¸¿¬ ¿´± ·²½´«¼» Ø±³» ×²ª»¬³»²¬ Ð¿®¬²»®¸·° ß½¬ øØÑÓÛ÷ Ú«²¼ ¿²¼ ßÎÎß Î»½±ª»®§ Ú«²¼ øÝÜÞÙóÎ ¿²¼ ØÐÎÐ÷ò Ì¸» Ë®¾¿² Ý±«²¬§ ±°»®¿¬» «²¼»® ¿ Ö±·²¬ Ð±©»® ß¹®»»³»²¬ øÖÐß÷ ©¸»®»¾§ ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ ¿½¬ ¿ ¬¸» ØÝÜ Ð®±¹®¿³ Ù®¿²¬»» ±² ¾»¸¿´º ±º Ý¿³°¾»´´ô Ô± ß´¬±ô Ô± ß´¬± Ø·´´öô Ô± Ù¿¬±ô Ó±²¬» Í»®»²±öô Ó±®¹¿² Ø·´´ô Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ô ¿²¼ ¬¸» Ë²·²½±®°±®¿¬»¼ ß®»¿ò Åö ½±²¬®·¾«¬» °±°«´¿¬·±² ¾«¬ ¼±» ²±¬ ®»½»·ª» º«²¼·²¹òÃ Ñª»® ¬¸» íï §»¿® ±º ¬¸» ØÝÜ Ð®±¹®¿³ô ¬¸» ¬±¬¿´ ¿²²«¿´ ¹®¿²¬ ®»½»·ª»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» Ë®¾¿² Ý±«²¬§ ¸¿ ¼»½®»¿»¼ ¿ ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» ½±¬ ¸¿ª» ·²½®»¿»¼ò Ì¸» Ý±«²¬§ ½±¬ ¬± Þ±¿®¼ ±º Í«°»®ª·±®æ Ü±²¿´¼ Úò Ù¿¹»ô Ù»±®¹» Í¸·®¿µ¿©¿ô Ü¿ª» Ý±®¬»»ô Õ»² Ç»¿¹»®ô Ô·¦ Õ²· Ý±«²¬§ Û¨»½«¬·ª»æ Ö»ºº®»§ Êò Í³·¬¸ Ú»¾®«¿®§ îíô îðïð î Ð¿¹» î ±º é ¿¼³·²·¬»® ØÝÜ ¸¿ ´±²¹ »¨½»»¼»¼ ¬¸» ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» ¿´´±©¿²½» ¿´´±©»¼ ¾§ ØËÜò Ì¸· º·½¿´ §»¿®ô ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ Ù»²»®¿´ Ú«²¼ «°°´»³»²¬»¼ ¬¸» ØÝÜ ¾«¼¹»¬ ·² ¬¸» ¿³±«²¬ ±º üêííôðððò Ù·ª»² ¬¸» ½±²¬·²«·²¹ ¾«¼¹»¬ ¼»º·½·¬ °®±¶»½¬»¼ º±® ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ Ù»²»®¿´ Ú«²¼ô ¬¸· ´»ª»´ ±º «¾·¼§ ½¿² ²± ´±²¹»® ¾» °®±ª·¼»¼ò Ì¸» Ñºº·½» ±º ßºº±®¼¿¾´» Ø±«·²¹ ¸¿ ¬¿µ»² »ª»®¿´ ¬»° ¬± ®»¼«½» ½±¬ô ·²½´«¼·²¹æ Ý±²±´·¼¿¬·±² ±º ¬©± ØÝÜ ß¼ª·±®§ Ý±³³·¬¬»» ·²¬± ±²» ß ¸·º¬ ¬± ¿ ¬©±ó§»¿® º«²¼·²¹ ½§½´» º±® ÝÜÞÙ Ð«¾´·½ Í»®ª·½» ½±²¬®¿½¬ Ý±´´¿¾±®¿¬·±² ©·¬¸ ïì ½·¬·» ±²¿ ·²¹´» ¼®¿º¬ ëóÇ»¿® Ý±²±´·¼¿¬»¼ Ð´¿² Ð®»°¿®¿¬·±² ±º ·²¹´» ¿°°´·½¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ³±²·¬±®·²¹ º±®³ Î»¼«½¬·±² ·² ØÝÜ ¬¿ºº·²¹ ¾§ º®±³ ïð ÚÌÛ·² îððí¬± éòé ·² îðïð ×² ¬¸» º¿´´ ±º îððçô ¿² Ë®¾¿² Ý±«²¬§ ÝÜÞÙ É±®µ·²¹ Ù®±«° ©¿ º±®³»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ Û¨»½«¬·ª»ñÝ·¬§ Ó¿²¿¹»® Ù®±«° ½±³°±»¼ ±º ®»°®»»²¬¿¬·ª» º®±³ ¬¸» °¿®¬·½·°¿¬·²¹ ¶«®·¼·½¬·±²ô ¬¸» ØÝÜ ß¼ª·±®§ Ý±³³·¬¬»»ô ¿²¼ ¬¸» ²±²ó°®±º·¬ ½±³³«²·¬§ò Ì¸» É±®µ·²¹ Ù®±«° ³»¬ ¬¸®»» ¬·³» ¬± ¼·½« ½±¬ ¿ª·²¹ ³»¿«®» ·² ¬¸» ÝÜÞÙ ß´´±½¿¬·±² Ð®±½» ¿²¼ ·² ¬¸» ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» °®±½»¼«®» ±º ¾±¬¸ ØËÜ ¿²¼ ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ò Ü«®·²¹ ¬¸· ¬·³»ô ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ Û¨»½«¬·ª» Ñºº·½» ½±³³··±²»¼ ¿ °®±¹®¿³ ¿»³»²¬ ±º ¬¸» Ë®¾¿² Ý±«²¬§ ØÝÜ Ð®±¹®¿³ ¾§ ¿² ±«¬·¼» ½±²«´¬¿²¬ò Ì¸» É±®µ·²¹ Ù®±«° ¼·½«»¼ ¬¸» ½«®®»²¬ ¬¿µ ¿²¼ ½±¬ ±º ¿¼³·²·¬»®·²¹ ¬¸» ÝÜÞÙ Ð®±¹®¿³ô ½±²·¼»®»¼ ¬¸» °®±¹®¿³ ¿»³»²¬ ¾§ Î»¿´·¦» Ý±²«´¬·²¹ Ù®±«°ô ÔÔÐô ´·¬»²»¼ ¬± ¬¸» ½±²½»®² ±º ¬¸» ÝÛÑ ±º Í·´·½±² Ê¿´´»§ Ý±«²½·´ ±º Ò±²óÐ®±º·¬ô ¿²¼ ®»½»·ª»¼ ¿ °®»»²¬¿¬·±² ¾§ Ý·¬§ Ü¿¬¿ Í»®ª·½» ±² ©»¾ó¾¿»¼ ³¿²¿¹»³»²¬ ±º ÝÜÞÙ Ù®¿²¬ò Ì¸» º«´´ °®±¹®¿³ ¿»³»²¬ ¾§ Î»¿´·¦» Ý±²«´¬·²¹ Ù®±«°ô ÔÔÝ · ß¬¬¿½¸³»²¬ ßò Ì¸» ¬±°·½ ±º ¬¸» Ø±«·²¹ Î»¸¿¾ Ð®±¹®¿³ ©¿ ¼»º»®®»¼ ¬± ¿ ´¿¬»® ¬·³»ò ÎÛÝÑÓÓÛÒÜßÌ×ÑÒÍ Ì¸» º±´´±©·²¹ ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±² ¬± ®»¼«½» ¬¸» ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» ¾«®¼»² ±º ¬¸» ÝÜÞÙ Ð®±¹®¿³ ¬± ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ Ù»²»®¿´ Ú«²¼ ¿®» °®±°±»¼ º±® ¿°°®±ª¿´ ¾§ ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ Û¨»½«¬·ª»ñÝ·¬§ Ó¿²¿¹»® Ù®±«°æ ïòÛ¬¿¾´·¸ ¿ ³·²·³«³ ¿³±«²¬ ±º üëôððð º±® Ð«¾´·½ Í»®ª·½» Ù®¿²¬ò øÉ±®µ·²¹ Ù®±«°÷ îò Ô·³·¬ ¬¸» ³¿¨·³«³ ²«³¾»® ±º Ð«¾´·½ Í»®ª·½» Ù®¿²¬ º±® »¿½¸ ½·¬§ ¬± º·ª» ¿²¼ ½±²·¼»® ¸·º¬·²¹ ³¿´´»® ½·¬§ ¹®¿²¬ ¬± ²±²óÝÜÞÙ º«²¼ò øÉ±®µ·²¹ Ù®±«°÷ íòÎ±«²¼ ¿´´ ¿³±«²¬ ¬± ¬¸» ²»¿®»¬ üïðð ¿¬ ¬¸» ¬·³» ¬¸¿¬ ¿¹®»»³»²¬ ¿®» º·²¿´·¦»¼ò øÉ±®µ·²¹ Ù®±«°÷ Ú»¾®«¿®§ îíô îðïð í Ð¿¹» í ±º é ìòÍ¸·º¬ ¿´´ Ð«¾´·½ Í»®ª·½» Ý±²¬®¿½¬ ¬± ¿ îó§»¿® ½±²½«®®»²¬ ½§½´»ò øÉ±®µ·²¹ Ù®±«°÷ ëòÝ¸¿²¹» °¿§³»²¬ ®»¯«»¬ º®±³ ³±²¬¸´§ ¬± ¯«¿®¬»®´§ ±® »³·ó¿²²«¿´´§ò øÑßØ÷ êòÍ¸¿®» °»®º±®³¿²½» ¿²¼ º·½¿´ ³±²·¬±®·²¹ ®»°±²·¾·´·¬·» ¿³±²¹ Ë®¾¿² Ý±«²¬§ ¶«®·¼·½¬·±²òøÑßØ÷ éòÍ»¬½·¬§ »¨°»²¼·¬«®» ¼»¿¼´·²» ¬± ¬©± §»¿® ¬± ³·²·³·¦» ®±´´ó±ª»®ò øÑßØ÷ èòÎ»¼«½» Ù»²»®¿´ Ú«²¼ ±ª»®¸»¿¼ ½¸¿®¹» ¬± ¬¸» ØÝÜ Ð®±¹®¿³ò øÝ±«²¬§ Û¨»½«¬·ª»÷ çòÍ»»µ °®±°±¿´ º±® ¿ ©»¾ó¾¿»¼ ¼¿¬¿ ³¿²¿¹»³»²¬ §¬»³ ¬± «²·º§ ¿²¼ ·³°´·º§ ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±² ±º ÝÜÞÙ Ð®±¹®¿³ò øÉ±®µ·²¹ Ù®±«°ñÑßØ÷ ïðò×²½®»¿» ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» ®»ª»²«» ¬± ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ ¾§ ®»¼«½·²¹ ±® »´·³·²¿¬·²¹ ¬¸» üïëôððð ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» ¿´´±©¿²½» ¿´´±½¿¬»¼ ¬± »¿½¸ Ý·¬§ò øÝ±«²¬§ Û¨»½«¬·ª»÷ ïïòÝ±²·¼»® «²·º§·²¹ ¿´´ ¹®¿²¬ «²¼»® Ý±«²¬§ ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±² º±® ÝÜÞÙ Ð®±¹®¿³ Ç»¿® îðïîñïí ·º ¿¾±ª» »ºº·½·»²½·» ½¿² ·¹²·º·½¿²¬´§ ®»¼«½» ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» ½±¬ò øÉ±®µ·²¹ Ù®±«°÷ ïîòÝ±²·¼»® º«®¬¸»® ·²½®»¿·²¹ ¬¸» ³·²·³«³ ¿³±«²¬ ¿²¼ ®»¼«½·²¹ ¬¸» ²«³¾»® ±º Ð«¾´·½ Í»®ª·½» Ù®¿²¬ º±® ÝÜÞÙ Ð®±¹®¿³ Ç»¿® îðïîñïíò øÑßØ÷ ß¬¬¿½¸³»²¬ Þ ¸±© ¿ °®±°±»¼ ·³°´»³»²¬¿¬·±² ¬·³»´·²» º±® ÝÜÞÙ ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±²ò ÞßÝÕÙÎÑËÒÜ Ñª»®ª·»© ±º Ë®¾¿² Ý±«²¬§ ØÝÜ Ð®±¹®¿³ Ì¸» Ë®¾¿² Ý±«²¬§ ©¿ º±®³»¼ ·² ïçéê ·² ±®¼»® ¬± ¿¬¬¿·² «ºº·½·»²¬ °±°«´¿¬·±² ¬± ¾»½±³» ¿² Û²¬·¬´»³»²¬ Ö«®·¼·½¬·±² ¿²¼ ®»½»·ª» º»¼»®¿´ Ý±³³«²·¬§ Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬ Þ´±½µ Ù®¿²¬ øÝÜÞÙ÷ô ØÑÓÛô ß³»®·½¿² Ü®»¿³ Ü±©² Ð¿§³»²¬ ß·¬¿²½» øßÜÜ×÷ Ð®±¹®¿³ ¿²¼ Û³»®¹»²½§ Í¸»´¬»® Ù®¿²¬ øÛÍÙô ²±© ¼·½±²¬·²«»¼÷ò ×² îððçô ¬¸» Ë®¾¿² Ý±«²¬§ ¿´± ¾»½¿³» »´·¹·¾´» º±® ßÎÎß Î»½±ª»®§ øÝÜÞÙóÎ÷ ¿²¼ Ø±³»´» Ð®»ª»²¬·±² ¿²¼ Î¿°·¼ Î»ó¸±«·²¹ øØÐÎÐ÷ º«²¼ò Ì¸» Ë®¾¿² Ý±«²¬§ ±°»®¿¬» «²¼»® ¿ ¬¸®»»ó §»¿® ®»²»©¿¾´» Ö±·²¬ Ð±©»® ß¹®»»³»²¬ øÖÐß÷ò Ì¸» ½«®®»²¬ ÖÐß · ½¸»¼«´»¼ ¬± »¨°·®» ±² Í»°¬»³¾»® íðô îðïïò ß² ¿²¿´§· ±º ¬¸» ´¿¬ »·¹¸¬ §»¿® ¸±© ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» Ë®¾¿² Ý±«²¬§ ¸¿ ®»½»·ª»¼ ¿ ¬±¬¿´ ±º üîìôëðêôíèé º®±³ ¬¸»» º»¼»®¿´ ±«®½»ò Ì¸» ¿³±«²¬ ±º ÝÜÞÙô ØÑÓÛô ¿²¼ ÛÍÙ ¹®¿²¬ ¸¿ ¾»»² ¼·³·²·¸·²¹ ¹®¿¼«¿´´§±ª»® ¬¸» §»¿® ¿ ¸±©² ·² ¬¸» º±´´±©·²¹ ¬¿¾´»æ Ú»¾®«¿®§ îíô îðïð ì Ð¿¹» ì ±º é Ú«²¼·²¹ ÝÜÞÙ ØÑÓÛÛÍÙ ßÎÎßÌ±¬¿´ Ç»¿® îðïð ïôéìîôëíï èéíôðíê ïôîïíôéìð üíôèîçôíðé îððç ïôéîéôëêí éèëôéðê üîôëïíôîêç îððè ïôéèèôêíð èîðôðéî üîôêðèôéðî îððé ïôèððôèéë èîéôîìç üîôêîèôïîì îððê îôðïèôêìð èçèôéëè üîôçïéôíçè îððë îôïìíôððð ïôððíôíéè èçôððð üíôîíëôíéè îððì îôðêëôëîé çïïôêëç èïôðîí üíôðëèôîðç îððí îôëèìôððð ïôðìíôððð èçôððð üíôéïêôððð Ì±¬¿´ üîìôëðêôíèé ß¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±² ±º ß´´ ØÝÜ Ð®±¹®¿³ Ì¸» Ý±«²¬§ ¿½¬ ¿ ¬¸» Ù®¿²¬»» ±º ¿´´ ØÝÜ Ð®±¹®¿³ ±² ¾»¸¿´º ±º ¬¸» °¿®¬·½·°¿¬·²¹ ¶«®·¼·½¬·±² ¿²¼ · ¬¸»®»º±®» ¿½½±«²¬¿¾´» ¬± ØËÜ º±® ¿´´ º·½¿´ ¿²¼ °»®º±®³¿²½» ³»¿«®»³»²¬ò Ì¸»®» ¿®» »ª»®¿´ ¼·¬·²½¬ °®±¹®¿³ º«²¼»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» ØÝÜ Ð®±¹®¿³ô ·²½´«¼·²¹ Ò»© Ø±«·²¹ Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬ô Ü±©² Ð¿§³»²¬ ß·¬¿²½»ô Ý±«²¬§ ¿²¼ Ý·¬§ ½¿°·¬¿´ °®±¶»½¬ô Í·²¹´» Ú¿³·´§ Ø±«·²¹ Î»¸¿¾·´·¬¿¬·±²ô Î»²¬¿´ Ø±«·²¹ Î»¸¿¾·´·¬¿¬·±²ô Ø±³»´» Ð®»ª»²¬·±²ô Î¿°·¼ Î»ó¸±«·²¹ô ¿²¼ Ð«¾´·½ Í»®ª·½» Ù®¿²¬ò Û¿½¸ °®±¹®¿³ ®»¯«·®» ¿ ´»ª»´ ±º »¨°»®¬·» ©·¬¸·² ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ ± ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» »´·¹·¾·´·¬§ ±º ¬¸» °®±¶»½¬ô ¿²¼ ±º ¬¸» Ë®¾¿² Ý±«²¬§ ·¬»´ºô · ²±¬ ¶»±°¿®¼·¦»¼ò ß ØËÜ ¿²¼ Ý±«²¬§ ®»¹«´¿¬·±² ¸¿ª» ³«´¬·°´·»¼ ±ª»® ¬¸» ´¿¬ íï §»¿®ô ± ¬±± ¸¿ª» ¬¸»²«³¾»® ¿²¼ ½±³°´»¨·¬§ ±º ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» ¬¿µò ÝÜÞÙ Ð«¾´·½ Í»®ª·½» Ù®¿²¬ ØËÜ ¿´´±© ²± ³±®»¬¸¿² ïëû ±º ¬¸» ¬±¬¿´ ¿²²«¿´ ÝÜÞÙ ¹®¿²¬ ¬± ¾» «»¼ º±® Ð«¾´·½ Í»®ª·½»ò É¸·´» ¬¸» Ë®¾¿² Ý±«²¬§ ¸¿ ¬¿§»¼ ©·¬¸·² ¬¸» ¿²²«¿´ ïëû »¨°»²¼·¬«®» ½¿°ô ¬¸» ¿½¬«¿´ ²«³¾»® ±º Ð«¾´·½ Í»®ª·½» ¹®¿²¬ íð º±® ¬¸» ½«®®»²¬ §»¿® óó · ìíû ±º ¬¸» ¬±¬¿´ ±º êç ¹®¿²¬ ¾»·²¹ ³¿²¿¹»¼ò Ð«¾´·½ Í»®ª·½» ¹®¿²¬ ¿®» ²±¬ ±²´§ ¬¸» ³±¬ ²«³»®±« ½±³°¿®»¼ ¬± ±¬¸»® ½¿¬»¹±®·» ±º º«²¼·²¹ô ¾«¬ ¬¸»§ ¿®» ¿´± ¬¸» ³¿´´»¬ ·² ·²¼·ª·¼«¿´ ¿³±«²¬ò Ì¸» º±´´±©·²¹ ¬¿¾´» ¸±© ¬¸» ¬±¬¿´ ²«³¾»® ±º ØÝÜ °®±¶»½¬ ¿¼³·²·¬»®»¼ ¼«®·²¹ ¬¸» ´¿¬ ¬¸®»» º·½¿´ §»¿®ô ·²½´«¼·²¹ ¬¸» ²«³¾»® ±º Ð«¾´·½ Í»®ª·½» °®±¶»½¬ °»® ½·¬§ò Ú»¾®«¿®§ îíô îðïð ë Ð¿¹» ë ±º é Ú×ÍÝßÔ ÎÑÔÔÑÊÛÎÒÛÉ ÐÎÑÖÛÝÌÍÌÑÌßÔ ÇÛßÎñÍÑËÎÝÛÐÎÑÖÛÝÌÍÐ«¾·½ Í»®ª·½» Ì±¬¿´ Ò»©ßÔÔ ÐÎÑÖÛÝÌÍ ÚÇ îððéñîððèæ Ý¿³°¾»´´î ê ïðïî Ô± ß´¬±î ë çïï Ô± Ù¿¬±ê ì èïì Ó±®¹¿² Ø·´´ë ì êïï Í¿®¿¬±¹¿é î ëïî Ð±±´ ó ÝÜÞÙï ïì îïîî Ð±±´ ó ØÑÓÛí ²ñ¿íê ÌÑÌßÔ îê íë êî èè ÚÇ îððèñîððçæ Ý¿³°¾»´´ð ê ïðïð Ô± ß´¬±í ê èïï Ô± Ù¿¬±é ì éïì Ó±®¹¿² Ø·´´í í ëè Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ê ï ëïï Ð±±´ ó ÝÜÞÙï ïí îðîï Ð±±´ ó ØÑÓÛë ²ñ¿îé ÌÑÌßÔ îë íí ëé èî ÚÇ îððçñîðïðæ Ý¿³°¾»´´ð ë çç Ô± ß´¬±ï é çïð Ô± Ù¿¬±ê ì éïí Ó±®¹¿² Ø·´´î í ëè Í¿®¿¬±¹¿é ï éïì Ð±±´óÝÜÞÙï ïð ïêïé Ð±±´ ó ØÑÓÛí ²ñ¿ìé ÌÑÌßÔ îð íð ëé éè Ì¸» ²»¨¬ ¬¿¾´» ·²¼·½¿¬» ¬¸¿¬ô ¬¸· §»¿®ô »ª»² «¾®»½·°·»²¬ ¿®» ®»½»·ª·²¹ ³«´¬·°´» ¹®¿²¬ ©·¬¸·² ¬¸» Ë®¾¿² Ý±«²¬§ ÝÜÞÙ Ð®±¹®¿³ò Í«¾®»½·°·»²¬ Ð±±´ Ý¿³°¾»´´ Ô± ß´¬± Ô± Ù¿¬± Ó±®¹¿² Ø·´´ Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ Ì±¬¿´ ÛØÝ üïïôèêè üèôêêï üîðôëîç Ô·º»Þ«·´¼»® ×²²Ê··±² ïéôìëï ëôïêï üîîôêïî Ò»¨¬ Ü±±® çôïðð ìôëíé íôìèí üïéôïîð Í«°°±®¬ ìôëíé ìôîðè üèôéìë Ò»¬©±®µ Ý¿¬¸±´·½ üíôéìì éôíéð ïëôëðð üîêôêïì Ý¸¿®·¬·» Ô·ª» Ñ¿µ îôððð ïîôìéð üïìôìéð Í»½±²¼ üìôèðð êôððð üïðôèðð Ø¿®ª»¬ Ì±¬¿´ üíèôìïç üîêôêìð üçôêçï üîìôêìð üîïôëðð üïîðôèçð Ú»¾®«¿®§ îíô îðïð ê Ð¿¹» ê ±º é ß¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» Î»°±²·¾·´·¬·» Ú«®¬¸»® ½±³°´·½¿¬·²¹ ¬¸» ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ØÝÜ Ð®±¹®¿³ · ¬¸» ³«´¬·ó§»¿® ²¿¬«®» ±º º»¼»®¿´ ¹®¿²¬ ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±²ò Û¿½¸ §»¿®ô ÑßØ · ¿¼³·²·¬»®·²¹ ¬¸®»» Ð®±¹®¿³ Ç»¿® ¿¬ ±²» ¬·³»æ Ð¿¬ §»¿®æ Ú·½¿´ ®±´´ó±ª»® ¿²¼ ½´±» ±«¬ô ¼¿¬¿ ½±´´»½¬·±² ¿²¼ »ª¿´«¿¬·±²ô «¾³·¬¬¿´ ±º ÝßÐÛÎ ®»°±®¬ ¬± ØËÜ ¾§ Í»°¬»³¾»® íðò Ý«®®»²¬ §»¿®æ Ð®»°¿®¿¬·±² ¿²¼ »¨»½«¬·±² ±º ½±²¬®¿½¬ô ®»¯«»¬ º±® ®»·³¾«®»³»²¬ô º·½¿´ ¿²¼ °»®º±®³¿²½»ô ¿²¼ ·²«®¿²½» ³±²·¬±®·²¹ô ¸±«·²¹ ·²°»½¬·±²ô ¿²¼ ¬®±«¾´»ó¸±±¬·²¹ò Ë°½±³·²¹ §»¿®æ Ð®»°¿®¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ®»´»¿» ±º ÎÚÐô »ª¿´«¿¬·±² ±º ¿°°´·½¿¬·±²ô °®»°¿®¿¬·±² ±º ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±² ¬± Þ±¿®¼ ±º Í«°»®ª·±®ô ¿²¼ «¾³·¬¬¿´ ±º ß²²«¿´ ß½¬·±² Ð´¿² ¬± ØËÜ ¾§ Ó¿§ ïëò Ñ¬¸»® °»®·±¼·½ ®»°±²·¾·´·¬·» ·²½´«¼» °®»°¿®¿¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ëó§»¿® Ý±²±´·¼¿¬»¼ Ð´¿²ô «°¼¿¬·²¹ ¬¸» ß²¿´§· ±º ×³°»¼·³»²¬ ¬± Ø±«·²¹ô ®»²»©¿´ ±º ¬¸» ÖÐßô ¿²¼ Ý±«²¬§ ¿²¼ º»¼»®¿´ ¿«¼·¬ò ÚÇîððçñïð °®»»²¬»¼ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» ½¸¿´´»²¹» ¿ ¬¸» Ë®¾¿² Ý±«²¬§ ¾»½¿³» »´·¹·¾´» ¿²¼ ¿°°´·»¼ º±® º»¼»®¿´ ßÎÎß Î»½±ª»®§ Ú«²¼ ¿²¼ ®»½»·ª»¼ ¶«¬ ¿ ëû ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» ¿´´±©¿²½»ò Ú·²¿´´§ô ·¬ ¸±«´¼ ¾» ²±¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ®»°±²·¾·´·¬·» ±º ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ ØÝÜ ¬¿ºº ¸¿ª» ·²½®»¿»¼ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ½±²¬·²«·²¹ ¸·¹¸ ¬«®²±ª»® ¿²¼ ®»¼«½»¼ ¬¿ºº·²¹ ±º ÝÜÞÙ «¾®»½·°·»²¬ò Ì¸» Ñºº·½» ±º ßºº±®¼¿¾´» Ø±«·²¹ ¸¿ º±«²¼ ¬¸¿¬ º»©»® ¿²¼ º»©»® ½·¬·» ¿²¼ ²±²ó°®±º·¬ ¸¿ª» ¬¸» ¬·³» ¿²¼ ¿¾·´·¬§ ¬± «²¼»®¬¿²¼ ¬¸» ½±³°´»¨·¬·» ±º ÝÜÞÙ ®»¹«´¿¬·±² ·² ±®¼»® ¬± ³»»¬ ¬¸» »´·¹·¾·´·¬§ ¿²¼ ®»°±®¬·²¹ ®»¯«·®»³»²¬ ±º ØËÜò Ì¸· ¸¿ ²»½»·¬¿¬»¼ ·¹²·º·½¿²¬ ¿³±«²¬ ±º Ý±«²¬§ ¬¿ºº ¬·³» ·² ¬®¿·²·²¹ ¿²¼ °®±¾´»³ ±´ª·²¹ ¬¸®±«¹¸±«¬ ¬¸» §»¿®ò ÝÜÞÙ ß¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» ß´´±©¿²½» Ì¸· §»¿®ô ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ Ù»²»®¿´ Ú«²¼ «°°´»³»²¬»¼ ¬¸» ÝÜÞÙ ¾«¼¹»¬ ¾§ üîèçôëðð ¬± ½±ª»® ¬¸» ¹¿° ¾»¬©»»² ¬¸» ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» ½¿° ¿´´±©»¼ ¾§ ØËÜ ¿²¼ ¬¸» ¿½¬«¿´ ½±¬ ±º ³¿²¿¹·²¹ ¬¸» Ð®±¹®¿³ò ß²¿´§· ±º ¬¸» ÝÜÞÙ Ð®±¹®¿³ ¼«®·²¹ ¬¸» ´¿¬ »·¹¸¬ §»¿® ·²¼·½¿¬» ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ¿²²«¿´ ÝÜÞÙ ¹®¿²¬ô ¬¸» ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» ¿´´±©¿²½»ô ¿²¼ ¬¸» ²«³¾»® ±º ¹®¿²¬ ¸¿ª» ¿´´ ¼»½®»¿»¼ ¿¬ ¿¾±«¬ ¬¸» ¿³» ®¿¬» óó íðóíêûò Ø±©»ª»®ô ¬¸» ½±¬ ±º ¿¼³·²·¬»®·²¹ ¬¸» Ð®±¹®¿³ ¸¿ ·²½®»¿»¼ ¾§ ïçûò Ú»¾®«¿®§ îíô îðïð é Ð¿¹» é ±º é îððíîðïð Ð»®½»²¬ ½¸¿²¹» ß³±«²¬ ±º ¹®¿²¬ üîôëèìôðððüïôéìîôëíï óííû Ò«³¾»® ±º Ð®±¶»½¬ïðèéï óíìû Í·¦» ±º ¿©¿®¼üîôððð ó üìèðôððð üîôððð ó üëìîôëéë Ò± ½¸¿²¹» ó õïíû ÝÜÞÙ ß¼³·² üìîêôèðð üîéíôëððóíêû ß´´±©¿²½» ÝÜÞÙ ß¼³·² üìéëôððð üëêíôðððõïçû Ý±¬ ÝÑÒÝÔËÍ×ÑÒ Ì¸» É±®µ·²¹ Ù®±«° ¿¹®»»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ®»¼«½·²¹ ¬¸» ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» ¾«®¼»² ±º ³¿²¿¹·²¹ ¿ ´¿®¹» ²«³¾»® ±º ³¿´´ ¹®¿²¬ ©¿ ¿¼ª·¿¾´» ¿²¼ ®»½±³³»²¼ ®¿··²¹ ³·²·³«³ ¿³±«²¬ ¿²¼ ®»¼«½·²¹ ¬¸» ²«³¾»® ±º Ð«¾´·½ Í»®ª·½» ¹®¿²¬ ·² ¬¸» º«¬«®»ò Ð¿®¬·½·°¿²¬ ©»®» ¿´± ·² º¿ª±® ±º îó§»¿® ½±²¬®¿½¬ô ½±²¬·²¹»²¬ ±² °»®º±®³¿²½» ¿²¼ ¿ª¿·´¿¾·´·¬§ ±º º«²¼ô ¿²¼ ³±ª·²¹ ¬± ¿ ©»¾ó¾¿»¼ ¹®¿²¬ ³¿²¿¹»³»²¬ §¬»³ò Î»¿´·¦» Ý±²«´¬·²¹ ¼·¼ ²±¬ ®»½±³³»²¼ º«®¬¸»® ®»¼«½¬·±² ·² ¬¿ºº·²¹ ¿ ¿ ©¿§ ¬± ®»¼«½» ½±¬ô ®¿¬¸»® ·¬ ©¿ «¹¹»¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ ½±²·¼»® ¬¸» Ý±²¬®¿ Ý±¬¿ ½±²±´·¼¿¬»¼ ³±¼»´ ±º ÝÜÞÙ ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±² º±® º«¬«®» §»¿®ò Ì¸» Ý±«²¬§ Û¨»½«¬·ª» Ñºº·½» ®»½±³³»²¼ ®»¬¿·²·²¹ ¬¸» üéëôððð ·² ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» º«²¼ ¬¸¿¬ · ½«®®»²¬´§ ¼·°»®»¼ ¬± ¬¸» ½·¬·»ò Ó»³¾»® ±º ¬¸» É±®µ·²¹ Ù®±«° º»´¬ ¬®±²¹´§ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ª¿´«» ±º ÝÜÞÙñØÑÓÛñßÎÎß ¹®¿²¬ ¸±«´¼ ²±¬ ¾» ´±¬ ·² ±«® »ºº±®¬ ¬± ¼»½®»¿» ¬¸» ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª» ¾«®¼»²ò Ì¸»§ »¨°®»»¼ ¿ ¼»·®» ¬± ½±²¬·²«» »»µ·²¹ ©¿§ ¬± ³¿¨·³·¦» ¬¸» ¿³±«²¬ ±º ¼·®»½¬ º«²¼·²¹ ¬± ²±²ó°®±º·¬ ±®¹¿²·¦¿¬·±² ¬¸¿¬ °®±ª·¼» ³«½¸ ²»»¼»¼ »®ª·½» ¬± ¬¸» ½±³³«²·¬§ò ß®»¿ ®»½±³³»²¼»¼ º±® º«®¬¸»® ¬«¼§ ¿®»æ ¿² »¨¿³·²¿¬·±² ±º Ý±«²¬§ °®±½»» ¬± »´·³·²¿¬» ®»¼«²¼¿²½·»å ¬¸» ¿°°®±°®·¿¬» ¬¿ºº·²¹ ´»ª»´ ²»»¼»¼ ¬± ¿¼³·²·¬»® ¬¸» ØÝÜ Ð®±¹®¿³å ¿²¼ ¿² »ª¿´«¿¬·±² ±º ¬¸» Ø±«·²¹ Î»¸¿¾ Ð®±¹®¿³ò ß¬¬¿½¸³»²¬æ ßò Ë®¾¿² Ý±«²¬§ ØÝÜ Ð®±¹®¿³ ß»³»²¬ ¾§ Î»¿´·¦» Ý±²«´¬·²¹ Ù®±«°ô ÔÔÝ Þò Ð®±°±»¼ ×³°´»³»²¬¿¬·±² Ì·³»´·²» º±® ÝÜÞÙ Î»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±² ½½æ ÝÜÞÙ É±®µ·²¹ Ù®±«° SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:AGENDA ITEM: March 3, 2010 DEPARTMENT:CITY MANAGER: City Manager’s OfficeDave Anderson PREPARED BY:DIRECTOR: Crystal MorrowBarbara Powell Administrative Analyst IIAssistant City Manager SUBJECT:Google Fiber for Communities Request for Information RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept report and direct staff accordingly. BACKGROUND: At the February 17, 2010 City Council Meeting, staff presented the Google Fiber for Communities Request for Information (RFI) and sought direction on whether or not to prepare a response from the City(see Attachment A to view the staff report from February 17, 2010). During the discussion, Council asked that additional information about theRFI be brought to the March 3, 2010 meeting, including opportunities to work with the community and neighboring cities to prepare a response to Google’s RFI. City staff has contacted local school districts and West Valley College to determine their interest in working with the City to prepare a response to the Google RFI. West Valley College indicated an interest in supporting efforts to respond to the RFI. Additionally, the Google RFI was discussed at the West Valley Mayors and Managers Meeting on February 24, 2010. During the meeting, Los Gatos Town Manager Greg Larsensharedthat Los Gatos is actively looking for a consultant to lead preparation of a response to Google’s RFI. Larsen offered to have the Los Gatos consultant prepare a joint response that includes neighboring cities. FISCAL IMPACTS: Fiscal impacts, including staff time, are expected to be minimal ifSaratoga works with Los Gatos and the Town’s consultant to prepare a response to the Google RFI. However, if the Council decidesthat the City should independently prepare a response it will require a significant amount of staff time to answerthe detailed RFI questionsand conduct the necessary community outreach to determine community support for Google Fiber for Communities testing. Page 1of 2 CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING THE RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: A response to Google Fiber for Communities RFI will not be prepared or submitted by the City. ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S): N/A FOLLOW UP ACTION(S): Implement Council direction. ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT: Nothing additional. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A:Staff report on Google Fiber for Communities RFI from February 17, 2010 Attachment B: Google Fiber for Communities RFI Page 2of 2 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: February 17, 2010 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER: City Manager’s Office Dave Anderson PREPARED BY: DIRECTOR: Crystal Morrow Barbara Powell Administrative Analyst II Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Google Fiber for Communities Request for Information RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept report and direct staff accordingly. BACKGROUND: On February 10, 2010, Google released a RFI to identify communities interested in participating in Google Fiber for Communities. Through this program Google will build and then test ultra- high speed broadband networks in several trial locations throughout the United States. This will in turn provide Google with information about developing and deploying ultra-high speed broadband networks elsewhere. Google’s ultra-high speed broadband network will be 100 times faster than the Internet connection used by most Americans and will provide residential connections of 1 gigabit per second. Google has named several factors that will influence selection of Google Fiber for Communities locations. Fist, Google has said locations that allow for quick and efficient deployment of its fiber optic network are preferred. Second, Google has indicated that priority will be given to communities that will see significant benefits as a result of the Google fiber optic network. To estimate speed and efficiency of deployment within a given community, Google will consider: -Terrain -Climate -Local regulation -Community support for the project -City resources that can assist in deployment -Accepted construction methods for residential fiber optic networks -Local regulatory issues Community support for the project appears to be of particular importance in the selection of locations. Google’s RFI questions suggest that responding municipalities should reach out to their communities and gauge interest through surveys, public hearings, or meetings with community groups. Should Council direct staff to respond to Google’s RFI, staff can reach out to Page 1 of 2 partners and residents in the community who may be interested in working with the City on its response. Although Google has not yet decided on the size of the trial locations, it has indicated that it anticipates providing service to a minimum of 50,000 people and a maximum of 500,000 in selected locations. The cost of service for fiber optic network customers has not been determined, but Google says it will offer competitive prices. The deadline to respond to the Google Fiber for Communities RFI is March 26, 2010. Requested Direction: Due to the nature of Google’s RFI, submitting a response will require a significant amount of staff time. Consequently, Council direction on whether or not to proceed with the proposal is requested. FISCAL IMPACTS: There are no direct financial impacts to the City of Saratoga for submitting a response to the Google RFI. However, staff time will be necessary to prepare the response. CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING THE RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: A response to Google Fiber for Communities RFI will not be prepared or submitted by the City. ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S): N/A FOLLOW UP ACTION(S): Implement Council direction. ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT: Nothing additional. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Google Fiber for Communities Request for Information Page 2 of 2 ûÏÌÔÓÈÔ×ÛÈÊ×ìÛÊÑÅÛÃ ïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×Åùû õÍÍÕÐ×óÎÙ ê×ËÇ×ÉÈÖÍÊóÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ õÍÍÕÐ×öÓÚ×ÊÖÍÊùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×É ö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃ ÈÔ õÍÍÕÐ×öÓÚ×ÊÖÍÊùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×É õÍÍÕÐ×ÓÉÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÈÍÐÛÇÎÙÔÛÎ×ÄÌ×ÊÓÏ×ÎÈÈÔÛÈÅ×ÔÍÌ×ÅÓÐÐÏÛÑ×óÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉÚ×ÈÈ×ÊÛÎØÖÛÉÈ×ÊÖÍÊ ×Æ×ÊÃÍÎ×å×ÌÐÛÎÈÍÈ×ÉÈÇÐÈÊÛÔÓÕÔÉÌ××ØÚÊÍÛØÚÛÎØÎ×ÈÅÍÊÑÉÓÎÍÎ×ÍÊÏÍÊ×ÈÊÓÛÐÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÙÊÍÉÉÈÔ× ÙÍÇÎÈÊÃíÇÊÎ×ÈÅÍÊÑÉÅÓÐÐØ×ÐÓÆ×ÊóÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÉÌ××ØÉÏÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎ ÈÓÏ×ÉÖÛÉÈ×ÊÈÔÛÎÅÔÛÈÏÍÉÈûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎÉ ÔÛÆ×ÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÈÍØÛÃÍÆ×ÊÕÓÕÛÚÓÈÌ×ÊÉ×ÙÍÎØÖÓÚ×ÊÈÍÈÔ×ÔÍÏ×ÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉå×ÐÐÍÖÖ×ÊÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÛÈÛ ÙÍÏÌ×ÈÓÈÓÆ×ÌÊÓÙ×ÈÍÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈ ÛÎØÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÇÌÈÍ Ì×ÍÌÐ× öÊÍÏÎÍÅÇÎÈÓÐïÛÊÙÔ ÛÈÓÍÎÛÚÍÇÈ ÈÔ×ÓÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÛê×ËÇ×ÉÈÖÍÊóÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎêöóÅÔÓÙÔÅ×ÐÐÇÉ×ÈÍØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ÅÔ×Ê×ÈÍÚÇÓÐØ ÍÇÊÎ×ÈÅÍÊÑ ê×ËÇ×ÉÈÖÍÊÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ õÍÍÕÐ×ÓÉÛÉÑÓÎÕÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÉÛÎØÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉÈÍ×ÄÌÊ×ÉÉÈÔ×ÓÊÓÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈÓÎÍÇÊÖÓÚ×ÊÍÌÈÓÙÈÊÓÛÐÛÎØÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÛÚÍÇÈÈÔ×ÓÊÊ×ÉÌ×ÙÈÓÆ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÚÃÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÎÕÍÇÊÊ×ËÇ×ÉÈÖÍÊÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ öÍÊÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈ÷ÄÔÓÚÓÈû è×ÐÐÇÉÔÍÅÏÇÙÔÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÅÍÇÐØÐÓÑ×ÈÍÒÍÓÎÈÔ×ÈÊÓÛÐÛÎØÛÚÍÇÈ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ÓÎÈÔ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ öÍÊÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉÛÎØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÕÊÍÇÌÉ÷ÄÔÓÚÓÈú óÖÃÍÇØÐÓÑ×ÛõÍÍÕÐ×ÖÓÚ×ÊÍÌÈÓÙÈÊÓÛÐÓÎÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ÈÔÓÉÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ËÇ×ÉÈÖÍÊ ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ õÍÍÕÐ×öÓÚ×ÊÖÍÊùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×É óÎÈÊÍØÇÙÈÓÍÎ óÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÈÍê×ÉÌÍÎØ×ÎÈÉ öûë öÍÊÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈ÷ÄÔÓÚÓÈû õ×Î×ÊÛÐÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ ùÍÐÐÛÚÍÊÛÈÓÎÕÍÎÛõÍÍÕÐ×ÖÓÚ×ÊÈÊÓÛÐ ãÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÉÉÇÌÌÍÊÈ öÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÏ×ÈÔÍØÉ ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÍÊÃÓÉÉÇ×É öÍÊÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉÛÎØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÕÊÍÇÌÉ÷ÄÔÓÚÓÈú ûØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐóÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ óÎÈÊÍØÇÙÈÓÍÎ åÔÛÈÓÉõÍÍÕÐ×ØÍÓÎÕÛÎØÅÔÛÈØÍ×ÉÓÈÉ××ÑÈÍÛÙÔÓ×Æ×ý óÏÛÕÓÎ×ÉÓÈÈÓÎÕÓÎÛÊÇÊÛÐÔ×ÛÐÈÔÙÐÓÎÓÙÉÈÊ×ÛÏÓÎÕÈÔÊ××ØÓÏ×ÎÉÓÍÎÛÐÏ×ØÓÙÛÐÓÏÛÕÓÎÕÍÆ×ÊÈÔ×Å×ÚÛÎØ ØÓÉÙÇÉÉÓÎÕÛÇÎÓËÇ×ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÛÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÓÉÈÓÎî×ÅãÍÊÑíÊØÍÅÎÐÍÛØÓÎÕÛÔÓÕÔØ×ÖÓÎÓÈÓÍÎÖÇÐÐ Ð×ÎÕÈÔÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÖÓÐÏÓÎÐ×ÉÉÈÔÛÎÖÓÆ×ÏÓÎÇÈ×ÉíÊÙÍÐÐÛÚÍÊÛÈÓÎÕÅÓÈÔÙÐÛÉÉÏÛÈ×ÉÛÊÍÇÎØÈÔ×ÅÍÊÐØÅÔÓÐ× ÅÛÈÙÔÓÎÕÐÓÆ× øÆÓØ×ÍÍÖÛÇÎÓÆ×ÊÉÓÈÃÐ×ÙÈÇÊ×çÎÓÆ×ÊÉÛÐÇÐÈÊÛÔÓÕÔÉÌ××ØóÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉÅÓÐÐÏÛÑ×ÛÐÐ ÈÔÓÉÛÎØÏÍÊ×ÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×å×Æ×ÇÊÕ×ØÈÔ×öùùÈÍÐÍÍÑÛÈÎ×ÅÛÎØÙÊ×ÛÈÓÆ×ÅÛÃÉÈÍÕ×ÈÈÔ×Ê×ÓÎÓÈÉîÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ úÊÍÛØÚÛÎØìÐÛÎyÛÎØÎÍÅÅ×Ê×ÛÎÎÍÇÎÙÓÎÕÛÎ×ÄÌ×ÊÓÏ×ÎÈÍÖÍÇÊÍÅÎ õÍÍÕÐ×ÓÉÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÈÍÚÇÓÐØÛÎØÈ×ÉÈÇÐÈÊÛÔÓÕÔÉÌ××ØÚÊÍÛØÚÛÎØÎ×ÈÅÍÊÑÉÓÎÛÉÏÛÐÐÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÈÊÓÛÐ ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÙÊÍÉÉÈÔ×ÙÍÇÎÈÊÃå×ÐÐØ×ÐÓÆ×ÊóÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÉÌ××ØÉÏÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎ ÈÓÏ×ÉÖÛÉÈ×ÊÈÔÛÎÅÔÛÈÏÍÉÈ ûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎÉÔÛÆ×ÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÈÍØÛÃÅÓÈÔÕÓÕÛÚÓÈÌ×ÊÉ×ÙÍÎØÖÓÚ×ÊÈÍÈÔ×ÔÍÏ×ÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉå×ÐÐÍÖÖ×Ê É×ÊÆÓÙ×ÛÈÛÙÍÏÌ×ÈÓÈÓÆ×ÌÊÓÙ×ÈÍÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈ ÛÎØÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÇÌÈÍ Ì×ÍÌÐ× ûÉÛÖÓÊÉÈÉÈ×ÌÅ×Ê×ÌÇÈÈÓÎÕÍÇÈÛÊ×ËÇ×ÉÈÖÍÊÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎêöóÈÍÔ×ÐÌÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÓÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈ×ØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×É å×Å×ÐÙÍÏ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÉÖÊÍÏÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÏ×ÏÚ×ÊÉÍÖÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙ íÇÊÕÍÛÐÓÉÈÍ×ÄÌ×ÊÓÏ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÎ×ÅÅÛÃÉÈÍÔ×ÐÌÏÛÑ×óÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉÚ×ÈÈ×ÊÛÎØÖÛÉÈ×ÊÖÍÊ×Æ×ÊÃÍÎ×ô×Ê× ÛÊ×ÉÍÏ×ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÈÔÓÎÕÉÈÔÛÈÅ×ÔÛÆ×ÓÎÏÓÎØ å×ÅÛÎÈÈÍÉ××ÅÔÛÈØ×Æ×ÐÍÌ×ÊÉÛÎØÇÉ×ÊÉÙÛÎØÍÅÓÈÔÇÐÈÊÛÔÓÕÔÉÌ××ØÉ î×ÄÈÕ×Î×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÌÌÉ ÅÔ×ÈÔ×ÊÓÈÉÙÊ×ÛÈÓÎÕÎ×ÅÚÛÎØÅÓØÈÔÓÎÈ×ÎÉÓÆ×ÑÓÐÐ×ÊÛÌÌÉÛÎØÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÇÉ×ÉÅ×ÙÛÎÈ Ã×ÈÓÏÛÕÓÎ× å×ÐÐÈ×ÉÈÎ×ÅÅÛÃÉÈÍÚÇÓÐØÖÓÚ×ÊÎ×ÈÅÍÊÑÉÛÎØÈÍÔ×ÐÌÓÎÖÍÊÏ î×ÅØ×ÌÐÍÃÏ×ÎÈÈ×ÙÔÎÓËÇ×É ÛÎØÉÇÌÌÍÊÈØ×ÌÐÍÃÏ×ÎÈÉ×ÐÉ×ÅÔ×Ê×Å×ÐÐÉÔÛÊ×Ñ×ÃÐ×ÉÉÍÎÉÐ×ÛÊÎ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÅÍÊÐØ å×ÐÐÍÌ×ÊÛÈ×ÛÎÍÌ×ÎÛÙÙ×ÉÉÎ×ÈÅÍÊÑÕÓÆÓÎÕÇÉ×ÊÉÈÔ×ÙÔÍÓÙ×ÍÖ íÌ×ÎÎ×ÉÉÛÎØÙÔÍÓÙ× ÏÇÐÈÓÌÐ×É×ÊÆÓÙ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÊÉûÎØÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÍÇÊÌÛÉÈÛØÆÍÙÛÙÃÅ×ÐÐÏÛÎÛÕ×ÍÇÊÎ×ÈÅÍÊÑÓÎ ÛÎÍÌ×ÎÎÍÎØÓÉÙÊÓÏÓÎÛÈÍÊÃÛÎØÈÊÛÎÉÌÛÊ×ÎÈÅÛÃ ðÓÑ×ÍÇÊåÓöÓÎ×ÈÅÍÊÑÓÎïÍÇÎÈÛÓÎæÓ×ÅÈÔ×ÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÈÍ×ÄÌ×ÊÓÏ×ÎÈÛÎØÐ×ÛÊÎî×ÈÅÍÊÑ ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÊÉÛÊ×ÏÛÑÓÎÕÊ×ÛÐÌÊÍÕÊ×ÉÉÈÍ×ÄÌÛÎØÛÎØÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ÔÓÕÔÉÌ××ØóÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉÚÇÈÈÔ×Ê×ÉÉÈÓÐÐ ÏÍÊ×ÈÍÚ×ØÍÎ×å×ØÍÎÈÈÔÓÎÑÅ×ÔÛÆ×ÛÐÐÈÔ×ÛÎÉÅ×ÊÉyÚÇÈÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÍÇÊÈÊÓÛÐÅ×ÔÍÌ×ÈÍÏÛÑ×Û Ï×ÛÎÓÎÕÖÇÐÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈÓÍÎÈÍÈÔ×ÉÔÛÊ×ØÕÍÛÐÍÖØ×ÐÓÆ×ÊÓÎÕÖÛÉÈ×ÊÛÎØÚ×ÈÈ×ÊóÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÖÍÊ×Æ×ÊÃÍÎ× ñ×Ã÷Æ×ÎÈÉìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×ØøÛÈ×É óÉÉÇÛÎÙ×ÍÖÊ×ËÇ×ÉÈÖÍÊÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃ ê×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ø×ÛØÐÓÎ×ïÛÊÙÔ õÍÍÕÐ×Ê×É×ÊÆ×ÉÈÔ×ÊÓÕÔÈÈÍÏÍØÓÖÃÛÎÃÍÖÈÔ×É×ØÛÈ×ÉûÎÃÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÅÓÐÐÚ×ÌÇÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÍÎÈÔÓÉÅ×ÚÉÓÈ× ùÍÎÖÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐóÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎîÍÈÓÙ× õÍÍÕÐ×ØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÉ××ÑÛÎÃÌÊÍÌÊÓ×ÈÛÊÃÍÊÙÍÎÖÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÃÍÇÊÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ûÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÐÃ ÌÐ×ÛÉ×ØÍÎÍÈÉÇÚÏÓÈÛÎÃÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÈÔÛÈÃÍÇØÍÎÍÈÅÛÎÈÈÍÚ×ÙÍÏ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÐÃÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×õÍÍÕÐ×ÅÓÐÐÎÍÈ Ú×ÇÎØ×ÊÛÎÃÍÚÐÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÈÍÈÊ×ÛÈÉÇÚÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÛÉÙÍÎÖÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÛÎØõÍÍÕÐ×ÏÛÃØÓÉÙÐÍÉ×ÉÇÚÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÈÍÈÔÓÊØ ÌÛÊÈÓ×ÉÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ××ÆÛÐÇÛÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉûÐÐÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØØÛÈÛÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÓÎÃÍÇÊÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÉÔÍÇÐØÚ× ÉÇÚÏÓÈÈ×ØÍÎÛÎÇÎÊ×ÉÈÊÓÙÈ×ØÚÛÉÓÉ øÓÉÙÐÛÓÏ×ÊÉ ð×ÕÛÐéÈÛÈÇÉ èÔÓÉêöóØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÙÍÎÉÈÓÈÇÈ×ÛÎØÉÔÍÇÐØÎÍÈÚ×ÓÎÈ×ÊÌÊ×È×ØÛÉÛÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÚ×ÈÅ××ÎõÍÍÕÐ×ÛÎØÛÎÃ×ÎÈÓÈÃ ÍÊÌ×ÊÉÍÎÖÍÊÈÔ×Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ×ÍÖÛÎÃÍÚÐÓÕÛÈÓÍÎóÎÉÈ×ÛØÈÔ×êöóÉ××ÑÉÈÍÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ ÖÊÍÏÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÈÍ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔÛÙÍÏÏÍÎÖÊÛÏ×ÅÍÊÑÅÓÈÔÓÎÅÔÓÙÔÛÎÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÖÍÊÛÖÓÚ×ÊÈÊÓÛÐÏÛÃ Ú×Ê×ÛÙÔ×Ø èÔ×ÉÇÚÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÍÖÛÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÈÍÈÔ×êöóÛÎØÉÇÚÉ×ËÇ×ÎÈ×ÆÛÐÇÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔÛÈÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÚÃõÍÍÕÐ×ÛÐÉÍØÍ×É ÎÍÈÙÍÎÉÈÓÈÇÈ×ÛÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÍÊÛÎÃÈÃÌ×ÍÖÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÚ×ÈÅ××ÎõÍÍÕÐ×ÛÎØÛÎÃÊ×ÉÌÍÎØ×ÎÈÖÍÊÈÔ× Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ×ÍÖÛÎÃÍÚÐÓÕÛÈÓÍÎíÎÐÃÈÔ××Ä×ÙÇÈÓÍÎÚÃõÍÍÕÐ×ÍÖÛÅÊÓÈÈ×ÎÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈÅÓÐÐÍÚÐÓÕÛÈ×õÍÍÕÐ×ÓÎ ÛÙÙÍÊØÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×È×ÊÏÉÛÎØÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÓÎÛÎÃÉÇÙÔÙÍÎÈÊÛÙÈûÐÐÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÉÈÍÈÔÓÉêöó Ú×ÙÍÏ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÍÖõÍÍÕÐ× ê×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÉÈÍÈÔÓÉêöóÏÛÃÎÍÈÚ×ÏÛØ×ÚÃ×ÏÌÐÍÃ××ÉÍÖÙÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÎÈÉÈÍÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÌ×ÊÉÍÎÉÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈ×ØÅÓÈÔ õÍÍÕÐ×úÃÉÇÚÏÓÈÈÓÎÕÛÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÈÍ×ÓÈÔ×ÊÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔÓÉêöó×ÛÙÔÊ×ÉÌÍÎØ×ÎÈÙ×ÊÈÓÖÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÎÍ ×ÏÌÐÍÃ××ÍÖÙÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÎÈÈÍÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÌ×ÊÉÍÎÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍõÍÍÕÐ×ÅÔÍÔÛÉÚ××ÎÍÊÓÉÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ× Ê×ÉÌÍÎØ×ÎÈÔÛÉÌÛÊÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØÓÎÌÊ×ÌÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉ× ûÎÃÌ×ÊÉÍÎÛÐÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎõÍÍÕÐ×Ê×Ù×ÓÆ×ÉÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×êöóÅÓÐÐÚ×ÇÉ×ØÚÃõÍÍÕÐ×ÍÎÐÃÖÍÊÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÉÍÖ ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÛÎØÊÇÎÎÓÎÕÈÔ×É×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉõÍÍÕÐ×ÅÓÐÐÍÎÐÃÉÔÛÊ×ÈÔÓÉÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÈÔÓÊØÌÛÊÈÓ×ÉÅÔ×Ê× Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÖÍÊÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÛÎØÊÇÎÎÓÎÕÈÔ×É×ÊÆÓÙ×É ùÍÉÈÍÖêöó èÔÓÉêöóØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÙÍÏÏÓÈõÍÍÕÐ×ÈÍÌÛÃÛÎÃ×ÄÌ×ÎÉ×ÓÎÙÇÊÊ×ØÚÃÃÍÇÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊ×ÌÛÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÃÍÇÊ Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉ× óÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÉÈÍê×ÉÌÍÎØ×ÎÈÉ ûÐÐÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÉÈÍÈÔÓÉêöóÉÔÍÇÐØÚ×ÉÇÚÏÓÈÈ×ØÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÓÎÈ×ÊÛÙÈÓÆ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÖÍÊÏÉÖÍÇÎØÍÎÈÔ× Å×ÚÉÓÈ×ÔÈÈÌ ÅÅÅÕÍÍÕÐ×ÙÍÏ ÛÌÌÉ×ÊÆ× ÖÓÚ×ÊÊÖÓóÎÍÊØ×ÊÈÍÊ×ÉÌÍÎØÈÍÈÔÓÉêöóÃÍÇÅÓÐÐÔÛÆ×ÍÎ×ÍÖ ÈÅÍÍÌÈÓÍÎÉ öÇÐÐÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÚÃÛÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÓÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈ×ØÓÎÔÛÆÓÎÕÓÈÉÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÉ×ÊÆ×ÛÉÛ ÈÊÓÛÐÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ íÈÔ×ÊÓÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈ×ØÌÛÊÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÎÍÎÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÊ×ÉÌÍÎØ×ÎÈÉ×ÄÌÐÛÓÎÓÎÕÅÔÃÈÔ×ÈÊÓÛÐÉÔÍÇÐØÚ× Ô×ÐØÓÎÈÔ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎØ×ÎÈÉÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ óÖÛÎÃÓÈ×ÏÓÎÈÔ×ðÍÙÛÐõÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈêöóÓÉÇÎÙÐ×ÛÊÛÅÊÓÈÈ×ÎÊ×ËÇ×ÉÈÖÍÊÙÐÛÊÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÏÛÃÚ×É×ÎÈÈÍ õÍÍÕÐ×éÇÙÔÊ×ËÇ×ÉÈÉÏÇÉÈÚ×É×ÎÈÍÎÐÃÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×Å×ÚÉÓÈ×ÚÃÉ×Ð×ÙÈÓÎÕÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÛÙÈÐÓÎÑÓÎÃÍÇÊ Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉ× ÔÈÈÌ ÅÅÅÕÍÍÕÐ×ÙÍÏ ÛÌÌÉ×ÊÆ× ÖÓÚ×ÊÊÖÓ ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ÖÛË ûÎöûëÙÛÎÚ×ÖÍÇÎØÔ×Ê× èÔ×ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÈÍÈÔ×êöóÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÍÊÚÃÍÈÔ×ÊÓÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈ×ØÌÛÊÈÓ×ÉÏÇÉÈÚ×ÉÇÚÏÓÈÈ×Ø ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×Å×ÚÉÓÈ×èÔ×ÓÎÈ×ÊÛÙÈÓÆ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÖÍÊÏÉÛÊ×Ø×ÉÓÕÎ×ØÈÍÛÐÐÍÅÃÍÇÈÍÚ×ÕÓÎÃÍÇÊÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÛÎØ ÈÔ×ÎÉÛÆ×ÓÈÛÎØÙÍÏ×ÚÛÙÑÈÍÓÈÖÍÊÖÇÊÈÔ×ÊÅÍÊÑèÔ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÅÓÐÐÍÎÐÃÚ×ÖÓÎÛÐÐÃÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ÅÔ×ÎÃÍÇ ÔÛÆ×ÙÐÓÙÑ×ØÈÔ×éÛÆ×ÛÎØÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×ÚÇÈÈÍÎÖÍÊÈÔ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉ×íÎÙ×ÃÍÇÔÛÆ×ÉÇÚÏÓÈÈ×ØÃÍÇÊÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÓÈ ÙÛÎÎÍÐÍÎÕ×ÊÚ××ØÓÈ×Ø ûÐÐÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÉÏÇÉÈÚ×ÉÇÚÏÓÈÈ×ØÎÍÐÛÈ×ÊÈÔÛÎ ÌÏìèÍÎÈÔ×ê×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ø×ÛØÐÓÎ×ØÛÈ×ûÎÃ ÉÇÚÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÇÚÏÓÈÈ×ØÛÖÈ×ÊÈÔ×Ø×ÛØÐÓÎ×ÅÓÐÐÎÍÈÚ×ÛÙÙ×ÌÈ×ØÔÍÅ×Æ×ÊõÍÍÕÐ×ÏÛÃÏÛÑ××ÄÙ×ÌÈÓÍÎÉÛÈ ÓÈÉÉÍÐ×ØÓÉÙÊ×ÈÓÍÎ ê×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÉÅÓÐÐÚ××ÆÛÐÇÛÈ×ØÛÎØÊÛÎÑ×ØÚÃÛÉ×Ð×ÙÈÓÍÎÈ×ÛÏØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÚÃõÍÍÕÐ×ÖÍÊÈÔÛÈÌÇÊÌÍÉ× õÍÍÕÐ×ÏÛÃÏÛÑ×ÛØ×ÙÓÉÓÍÎÍÎÔÍÅÈÍÌÊÍÙ××ØÅÓÈÔÊ×ÉÌ×ÙÈÈÍÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÉÛÈÛÎÃÈÓÏ×ÅÓÈÔÍÇÈÖÇÊÈÔ×Ê ÎÍÈÓÙ×çÌÍÎÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÍÖõÍÍÕÐ×É×ÆÛÐÇÛÈÓÍÎõÍÍÕÐ×ÅÓÐÐÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÛÚÍÇÈÈÔ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÉÛÎØ Î×ÄÈÉÈ×ÌÉûÉÍÎ×ÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÍÇÈÙÍÏ×ÍÖÈÔ×êöóÛÉÔÍÊÈÐÓÉÈÍÖÊ×ÉÌÍÎØÓÎÕÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÏÛÃÚ×ÛÉÑ×ØÈÍ ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÖÇÊÈÔ×ÊÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÈÔÍÇÕÔÈÔÓÉÅÓÐÐÍÎÐÃÍÙÙÇÊÛÈõÍÍÕÐ×ÉØÓÉÙÊ×ÈÓÍÎ ûÐÐÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÍõÍÍÕÐ×Ê×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕÈÔ×ðÍÙÛÐõÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈêöóÏÇÉÈÚ×ÏÛØ×ÉÍÐ×ÐÃÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ× Å×ÚÉÓÈ×ÌÐ×ÛÉ×ÇÉ×ÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈÛÙÈÐÓÎÑÓÎÃÍÇÊÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ× öûë åÔÛÈÓÉõÍÍÕÐ×ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÈÍÚÇÓÐØý õÍÍÕÐ×ÓÉÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÈÍÚÇÓÐØÛÎØÈ×ÉÈÇÐÈÊÛÔÓÕÔÉÌ××ØÚÊÍÛØÚÛÎØÎ×ÈÅÍÊÑÉÓÎÍÎ×ÍÊÏÍÊ×ÈÊÓÛÐÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉ ÛÙÊÍÉÉÈÔ×ÙÍÇÎÈÊÃå×ÐÐØ×ÐÓÆ×ÊóÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÉÌ××ØÉÏÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎ ÈÓÏ×ÉÖÛÉÈ×ÊÈÔÛÎÅÔÛÈÏÍÉÈûÏ×ÊÓÙÛÎÉ ÔÛÆ×ÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÈÍØÛÃÍÆ×ÊÕÓÕÛÚÓÈÌ×ÊÉ×ÙÍÎØÖÓÚ×ÊÈÍÈÔ×ÔÍÏ×ÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉå×ÐÐÍÖÖ×ÊÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÛÈÛ ÙÍÏÌ×ÈÓÈÓÆ×ÌÊÓÙ×ÈÍÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈ ÛÎØÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÇÌÈÍ Ì×ÍÌÐ× åÔÃÓÉõÍÍÕÐ×ØÍÓÎÕÈÔÓÉý íÇÊÕÍÛÐÓÉÈÍ×ÄÌ×ÊÓÏ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÎ×ÅÅÛÃÉÈÍÔ×ÐÌÏÛÑ×óÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉÚ×ÈÈ×ÊÛÎØÖÛÉÈ×ÊÖÍÊ×Æ×ÊÃÍÎ× åÔÛÈÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÅÓÐÐõÍÍÕÐ×ÇÉ×ÈÍÉ×Ð×ÙÈÈÔ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÖÍÊÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈý ûÚÍÆ×ÛÐÐÅ×Ê×ÓÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈ×ØÓÎØ×ÌÐÍÃÓÎÕÍÇÊÎ×ÈÅÍÊÑ×ÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÈÐÃÛÎØËÇÓÙÑÐÃÛÎØÛÊ×ÔÍÌÓÎÕÈÍÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃ ÓÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈ×ØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÅÓÐÐÅÍÊÑÅÓÈÔÇÉÈÍÛÙÔÓ×Æ×ÈÔÓÉÕÍÛÐå×ÛÐÉÍÅÛÎÈÈÍÅÛÎÈÈÍÅÍÊÑÅÓÈÔÛ ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÅÔ×Ê×Å×ÙÛÎÚÊÓÎÕÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÚ×Î×ÖÓÈÉÈÍÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉÛÎØØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÇÉ×ÖÇÐÌÊÍÍÖÉÍÖÙÍÎÙ×ÌÈÈÔÛÈ ÙÛÎÔÛÆ×ÛÚÊÍÛØ×ÊÓÏÌÛÙÈöÍÊ×ÄÛÏÌÐ×Å×Ê×ÐÍÍÑÓÎÕÖÍÊÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÈÍ×ÄÌ×ÊÓÏ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔØ×ÌÐÍÃÏ×ÎÈ È×ÙÔÎÓËÇ×ÉÈÔÛÈÙÛÎÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÎØÛÙÙ×Ð×ÊÛÈ×ÚÊÍÛØÚÛÎØØ×ÌÐÍÃÏ×ÎÈ×ÐÉ×ÅÔ×Ê×ÛÉÅ×ÐÐ èÍÈÔÛÈ×ÎØÅ×ÐÐÇÉ×ÍÇÊêöóÈÍÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÓÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈ×ØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÈÍÛÉÉ×ÉÉÐÍÙÛÐÖÛÙÈÍÊÉÈÔÛÈÅÓÐÐ ÓÏÌÛÙÈÈÔ××ÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÙÃÛÎØÉÌ××ØÍÖÍÇÊØ×ÌÐÍÃÏ×ÎÈÉÇÙÔÛÉÈÔ×Ð×Æ×ÐÍÖÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÐÍÙÛÐ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÅ×ÛÈÔ×ÊÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÏ×ÈÔÍØÉÛÎØÐÍÙÛÐÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÍÊÃÓÉÉÇ×Éå×ÅÓÐÐÛÐÉÍ ÈÛÑ×ÓÎÈÍÛÙÙÍÇÎÈÚÊÍÛØÚÛÎØÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÓÐÓÈÃÛÎØÉÌ××ØÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÛÐÊ×ÛØÃÍÖÖ×Ê×ØÈÍÇÉ×ÊÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ èÔ×êöóÓÉÛÖÓÊÉÈÉÈ×ÌyÅ×ÌÐÛÎÈÍÙÍÎÉÇÐÈÅÓÈÔÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÍÊÕÛÎÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÙÍÎØÇÙÈÉÓÈ× ÆÓÉÓÈÉÛÎØÏ××ÈÅÓÈÔÐÍÙÛÐÍÖÖÓÙÓÛÐÉÚ×ÖÍÊ×ÛÎÎÍÇÎÙÓÎÕÍÇÊÖÓÎÛÐØ×ÙÓÉÓÍÎÉ åÔ×ÎØÍ×ÉõÍÍÕÐ××ÄÌ×ÙÈÈÍÛÎÎÍÇÎÙ×ÛÈÛÊÕ×ÈÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃý å×ÌÐÛÎÈÍÛÎÎÍÇÎÙ×ÛÈÛÊÕ×ÈÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÍÊÈÛÊÕ×ÈÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔÓÉÃ×ÛÊ ôÍÅÏÇÙÔÅÓÐÐÈÔ×É×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉÙÍÉÈý èÔ×ÖÓÎÛÐÌÊÓÙ×ÔÛÉÎÍÈÃ×ÈÚ××ÎØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÚÇÈÅ×ÓÎÈ×ÎØÈÍÍÖÖ×ÊÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÛÈÛÙÍÏÌ×ÈÓÈÓÆ×ÌÊÓÙ× åÔÃÅÍÇÐØÙÍÎÉÇÏ×ÊÉÎ××ØõÚÌÉÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉý óÎÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÅÛÃÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈÓÍÎÖÊÍÏØÓÛÐÇÌÈÍÚÊÍÛØÚÛÎØÏÛØ×ÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÈÔ××Ï×ÊÕ×ÎÙ×ÍÖÍÎÐÓÎ× ÆÓØ×ÍÛÎØÙÍÇÎÈÐ×ÉÉÍÈÔ×ÊÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÇÐÈÊÛÔÓÕÔÉÌ××ØÚÛÎØÅÓØÈÔÅÓÐÐØÊÓÆ×ÏÍÊ×ÓÎÎÍÆÛÈÓÍÎyÓÎÔÓÕÔ Ø×ÖÓÎÓÈÓÍÎÆÓØ×ÍÊ×ÏÍÈ×ØÛÈÛÉÈÍÊÛÕ×Ê×ÛÐÈÓÏ×ÏÇÐÈÓÏ×ØÓÛÙÍÐÐÛÚÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÉÈÔÛÈÅ×ÙÛÎÎÍÈÃ×È ÓÏÛÕÓÎ×óÈÅÓÐÐ×ÎÛÚÐ×Î×ÅÙÍÎÉÇÏ×ÊÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÏ×ØÓÙÛÐ×ØÇÙÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉÈÔÛÈ ÙÛÎÚ×Î×ÖÓÈÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉóÖÈÔ×óÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÔÛÉÈÛÇÕÔÈÇÉÛÎÃÈÔÓÎÕÓÈÉÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÏÍÉÈÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈÓÎÎÍÆÛÈÓÍÎÉ ÛÊ×ÍÖÈ×ÎÈÔÍÉ×Å×Ð×ÛÉÈ×ÄÌ×ÙÈ åÔ×ÎØÍ×ÉõÍÍÕÐ××ÄÌ×ÙÈÈÍÔÛÆ×ÛõÚÌÉÎ×ÈÅÍÊÑÇÌÛÎØÊÇÎÎÓÎÕý èÍØÛÃÉÛÎÎÍÇÎÙ×Ï×ÎÈÓÉÈÔ×ÖÓÊÉÈÍÖÏÛÎÃÉÈ×ÌÉÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×ÅÛÃóÈÉÈÍÍ×ÛÊÐÃÈÍÛÎÎÍÇÎÙ×ÛØ×ÖÓÎÓÈ× ÐÛÇÎÙÔØÛÈ×ÚÇÈÍÇÊÔÍÌ×ÓÉÈÍÔÛÆ×ÛÎ×ÈÅÍÊÑÇÌÛÎØÊÇÎÎÓÎÕÛÉÉÍÍÎÛÉÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×êÓÕÔÈÎÍÅÍÇÊÖÍÙÇÉÓÉ ÍÎÖÓÎØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÊÓÕÔÈÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÖÍÊÍÇÊÈÊÓÛÐ åÔÛÈØÍÃÍÇÏ×ÛÎÚÃÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈ ÛÎØÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐÃÇÌÈÍ Ì×ÍÌÐ×ý å×ÔÛÆ×ÎÍÈÃ×ÈØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÈÔ×ÉÓÂ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÓÛÐÅÔÓÙÔÅÓÐÐÚ×ÚÛÉ×ØÓÎÐÛÊÕ×ÌÛÊÈÍÎÈÔ×ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÓÐÓÈÃÍÖ ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉå××ÄÌ×ÙÈÈÔÛÈÅ×ÅÓÐÐÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÈÔÓÉÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÈÍÛÏÓÎÓÏÇÏÍÖ Ì×ÍÌÐ×ÛÎØÇÌ ÈÍÛÉÏÛÎÃÛÉ Ì×ÍÌÐ×ÏÍÉÈÐÓÑ×ÐÃÓÎÏÇÐÈÓÌÐ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×É ùÛÎóÉÇÚÏÓÈÍÎÚ×ÔÛÐÖÍÖÛÎÍÎÙÓÈÃÏÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐÓÈÃý ã×ÉÅ×ÅÓÐÐÛÙÙ×ÌÈÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÉÖÊÍÏÛÎÃÈÃÌ×ÍÖÏÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐÓÈÃÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÙÍÇÎÈÓ×ÉÏÓÐÓÈÛÊÃÚÛÉ×É Ê×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÉ×ÈÙìÐ×ÛÉ×ÇÉ×ÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÉÐÓÎÑÓÖÃÍÇÛÊ×ÛÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÍÊÏÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐÍÖÖÓÙÓÛÐ ÍÈÔ×ÊÅÓÉ×ÌÐ×ÛÉ×ÇÉ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉÛÎØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÕÊÍÇÌÉÐÓÎÑ åÔÍÓÉÛÐÐÍÅ×ØÈÍÉÇÚÏÓÈÛÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÍÎÚ×ÔÛÐÖÍÖÛÏÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐÓÈÃý ê×ÉÌÍÎØ×ÎÈÉÉÔÍÇÐØÙÐ×ÛÊÐÃÉÈÛÈ×ÈÔ×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÅÔÓÙÔÈÔ×ÃÊ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÈÔ×ÓÊÙÓÈÃå××ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉ×É ÖÊÍÏÙÓÈÃÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊÉ×Ð×ÙÈ×ØÍÖÖÓÙÓÛÐÉÛÎØÏÛÃÍÊÉóÖÃÍÇØÍÎÍÈÊ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÃÍÇÊÙÓÈÃÌÐ×ÛÉ×ÉÇÚÏÓÈÛ ÉÈÛÈ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖÓÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈÖÍÊÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉÛÎØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÕÊÍÇÌÉ åÔÛÈÓÖóØÍÎÈÔÛÆ×ÛÐÐÈÔ×ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÎ××Ø×ØÈÍÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ÈÔ×êöóý å×ÛÊ×ÛÉÑÓÎÕÏÇÎÓÙÓÌÛÐÓÈÓ×ÉÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛÉÏÇÙÔÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÛÉÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÛÚÍÇÈÈÔ×ÓÊÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÚÇÈÛÐÐ ÉÇÚÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÛÊ×Å×ÐÙÍÏ×ìÐ×ÛÉ×ÖÓÐÐÓÎÛÉÏÛÎÃÍÖÈÔ×ÖÓ×ÐØÉÛÉÃÍÇÙÛÎÛÎØÐ×ÈÇÉÑÎÍÅÍÖÛÎÃÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐ ÙÓÊÙÇÏÉÈÛÎÙ×ÉÈÔÛÈÏÓÕÔÈÚ×ÛÖÖ×ÙÈÓÎÕÃÍÇÊÉÇÚÏÓÉÉÓÍÎ öÍÊÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈ÷ÄÔÓÚÓÈû õ×Î×ÊÛÐÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØÖÓ×ÐØÉ îÛÏ×ÍÖÕÍÆ×ÊÎÓÎÕÚÍØÃÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ãÍÇÙÛÎÙÊ×ÛÈ×ÛÎÛÏ×ÖÍÊ×ÛÙÔÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×îÛÏ×ÍÖÈÔÓÉÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ× ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ðÓÉÈÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÓÎÃÍÇÊÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ× ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ èÔ×É×ÏÛÃÚ×ÛÇÈÍÎÍÏÍÇÉÇÎÓÈÉÍÖÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÚÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×ÉÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎØÓÎÕ×ÎÈÓÈÃÉÇÙÔÛÉ ÈÍÅÎÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÙÍÇÎÈÃØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÉÍÊÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÈÍÅÎÍÊÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÇÎÓÈÉÍÖÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÊ×ÉÌÍÎØÓÎÕ ÈÍÕ×ÈÔ×ÊÉÇÙÔÛÉÛÒÍÓÎÈÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉ×ÍÖÏÇÐÈÓÌÐ×ÙÍÇÎÈÓ×ÉÍÊÈÍÅÎÉ ùÍÎÈÛÙÈÌ×ÊÉÍÎ îÛÏ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ èÓÈÐ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûØØÊ×ÉÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ éÈÛÈ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ âóìøÓÕÓÈÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÔÍÎ×ÎÇÏÚ×ÊÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÷ÏÛÓÐÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ùÍÎÈÛÙÈÌ×ÊÉÍÎÔÛÉÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÈÃÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÈÔ×É×ÛÎÉÅ×ÊÉÛÉÈÔ×ÍÖÖÓÙÓÛÐÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎØÓÎÕÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈý ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÖÎÍÈÌÐ×ÛÉ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÙÍÎÈÛÙÈÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÍÖÖÓÙÓÛÐÅÔÍØÍ×ÉÔÛÆ×ÉÇÙÔÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÈÃ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÍÌÇÐÛÈ×ØÛÊ×ÛÓÎÉËÇÛÊ×ÏÓÐ×ÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÐ×ÛÉ×Ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÔÍÅÈÔ×ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÓÉØÓÉÈÊÓÚÇÈ×Ø ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ï×ØÓÛÎÔÍÇÉ×ÔÍÐØÓÎÙÍÏ×Ì×ÊÛÎÎÇÏÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ îÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÔÍÇÉÓÎÕÇÎÓÈÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ îÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÉÓÎÕÐ×ÖÛÏÓÐÃÔÍÏ×ÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ îÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÏÇÐÈÓÖÛÏÓÐÃÔÍÏ×ÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ îÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÛÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÙÍÏÌÐ×Ä×ÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÆ×ÊÛÕ×ÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÇÎÓÈÉÌ×ÊÛÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÙÍÏÌÐ×ÄÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ îÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÕÛÈ×ØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÆ×ÊÛÕ×ÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÔÍÇÉÓÎÕÇÎÓÈÉÌ×ÊÕÛÈ×ØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×Ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÍÖÔÍÇÉ×ÔÍÐØÉÓÎ×ÎÈÓÊ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÅÓÈÔÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÚÊÍÛØÚÛÎØóÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÉ×ÊÆÓÙ× ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×Ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÔÍÇÉ×ÔÍÐØÉÓÎ×ÎÈÓÊ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÉÇÚÉÙÊÓÚÓÎÕÈÍÚÊÍÛØÚÛÎØóÎÈ×ÊÎ×È É×ÊÆÓÙ× ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ è×ÊÊÛÓÎ íÆ×ÊÛÐÐØ×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎÍÖÈ×ÊÊÛÓÎ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÍÖÌÐÛÓÎÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÍÖÊÍÐÐÓÎÕÔÓÐÐÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÍÖÏÍÇÎÈÛÓÎÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÍÈÔ×ÊÈ×ÊÊÛÓÎÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ùÐÓÏÛÈ× ûÆ×ÊÛÕ×ÛÎÎÇÛÐÔÓÕÔ×ÉÈÈ×ÏÌ×ÊÛÈÇÊ×öÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÆ×ÊÛÕ×ÛÎÎÇÛÐÈ×ÏÌ×ÊÛÈÇÊ×öÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÆ×ÊÛÕ×ÛÎÎÇÛÐÐÍÅ×ÉÈÈ×ÏÌ×ÊÛÈÇÊ×öÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÆ×ÊÛÕ×ÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÉÎÍÅÖÛÐÐÌ×ÊÃ×ÛÊÓÎÙÔ×ÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÆ×ÊÛÕ×ÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÊÛÓÎÖÛÐÐÌ×ÊÃ×ÛÊÓÎÙÔ×ÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÆ×ÊÛÕ×ÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÖÔÇÊÊÓÙÛÎ×ÍÊÈÍÊÎÛØÍÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÃÓÎÛÃ×ÛÊØÛÃÉ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ðÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈ öÍÊÏÍÖÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÙÓÈÃÈÍÅÎÙÍÇÎÈÃ×ÈÙ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ðÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÊÇÐ×ôÍÏ×êÇÐ×ðÓÏÓÈ×ØêÇÐ×íÈÔ×Ê ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ éÍÇÊÙ×ÍÖÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈØ×ÙÓÉÓÍÎÏÛÑÓÎÕÙÓÈÃÏÛÎÛÕ×ÊÙÓÈÃÙÍÇÎÙÓÐÏÛÃÍÊ×ÈÙ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ çÈÓÐÓÈÓ×É ìÐ×ÛÉ×ÐÓÉÈÐÛÊÕ×ÉÈÇÈÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÈÔ×ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×Ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÙÍÆ×Ê×ØÚÃ×ÛÙÔÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ê ìÊÍÆÓØ×ÊîÛÏ×ùÍÆ×ÊÛÕ× ÷Ð×ÙÈÊÓÙÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ õÛÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ åÛÈ×ÊÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ é×Å×ÊÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ùÛÚÐ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÔÍÎ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ðÍÙÛÐ×ÙÍÎÍÏÃÏÓÄÓÖÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ× îÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÔÓÕÔÈ×ÙÔÒÍÚÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ îÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÏÛÎÇÖÛÙÈÇÊÓÎÕÒÍÚÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ îÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖ×ØÇÙÛÈÓÍÎÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉÒÍÚÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ îÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÍÈÔ×ÊÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×É×ÙÈÍÊÒÍÚÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ùÍÐÐ×Õ×ÉÛÎØÇÎÓÆ×ÊÉÓÈÓ×ÉðÓÉÈÎÛÏ×ÉÛÎØÛÆ×ÊÛÕ×ÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÉÈÇØ×ÎÈÉ×ÎÊÍÐÐ×ØÛÈ×ÛÙÔÓÖÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ× ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ïÛÒÍÊÔÍÉÌÓÈÛÐÉ Ô×ÛÐÈÔÙÛÊ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉðÓÉÈÎÛÏ×É ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÊÉÍÖÔÓÕÔÉÌ××ØóÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ùÍÏÌÛÎÃøéðùÛÚÐ×ÏÍØ×ÏÅÓÊ×Ð×ÉÉÖÓÚ×Ê×ÈÙ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ íÈÔ×ÊÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉÍÖÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÈÔÛÈÙÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×Ð×ÆÛÎÈÖÍÊÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÎÈÔÓÉÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÅ×ÛÉÑÃÍÇÈÍÉÔÛÊ×ÔÍÅÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÅÍÇÐØÅÍÊÑÅÓÈÔõÍÍÕÐ×ÈÍ×ÎÛÚÐ×ÇÉÈÍ ÌÊÍÙ××ØËÇÓÙÑÐÃÛÎØ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÆ×ÐÃ ûÊ×ÃÍÇÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÅÓÐÐÓÎÕÈÍÛÌÌÍÓÎÈÛÎÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐÈÍÉ×ÊÆ×ÛÉÛÉÓÎÕÐ×ÌÍÓÎÈÍÖÙÍÎÈÛÙÈý ã×É îÍÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÉÓÎÕÐ×ÌÍÓÎÈÍÖÙÍÎÈÛÙÈÈÍÙÍÍÊØÓÎÛÈ×ÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÛÎØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÉÓÎÈ×ÊÛÙÈÓÍÎÉÅÓÈÔõÍÍÕÐ×ÈÍÍÚÈÛÓÎ ÛÉÌÊÍÏÌÈÐÃÛÉÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÅÔÛÈ×Æ×ÊÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎõÍÍÕÐ×ÏÛÃÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÛÎØÈÍÊ×ÉÍÐÆ×ÛÎÃÌÊÍÚÐ×ÏÉÈÔÛÈÏÛÃÛÊÓÉ×ÛÉ ËÇÓÙÑÐÃÛÎØ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÆ×ÐÃÛÉÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ× óÖÉÍÌÐ×ÛÉ×Ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÛÇÈÔÍÊÓÈÃÈÔÛÈÈÔÓÉÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐÅÓÐÐÔÛÆ× ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÛÎÃÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÍÊÌÐÛÎÎ×ØÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÉÓÎÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÈÍÛÙÙ×Ð×ÊÛÈ×ÛÎØ×ÄÌÛÎØÛØÍÌÈÓÍÎÛÎØÇÉ×ÍÖ ÚÊÍÛØÚÛÎØóÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÊ×ÛÉÍÎÉÃÍÇÚ×ÐÓ×Æ×ÈÔÛÈõÍÍÕÐ×ÉÔÍÇÐØÉ×Ð×ÙÈÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÖÍÊÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÐ×ÛÉ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛÅ×ÚÐÓÎÑÈÍÛÎÃÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÃÍÇÅÓÉÔÇÉÈÍÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊéÇÚÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÇÉÓÎÕõÍÍÕÐ×ïÛÌÉÍÊ ãÍÇèÇÚ×ÛÊ××ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ×Ø ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ õÍÍÕÐ×ÓÉÓÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈ×ØÓÎÅÍÊÑÓÎÕÅÓÈÔÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÓÎÅÔÓÙÔÓÈÙÛÎÊÛÌÓØÐÃÓÎÉÈÛÐÐÖÓÚ×ÊÍÌÈÓÙÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÍÖÖ×ÊÇÐÈÊÛ ÔÓÕÔÉÌ××ØóÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉõÍÍÕÐ×Ê×ÉÌ×ÙÈÉÈÔ×Ð×ÕÓÈÓÏÛÈ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÓÐÓÈÃÍÖÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÉÈÍÌÊ×É×ÊÆ× ÛÎØÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÛÉÉ×ÈÉÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ×ØÓÉÊÇÌÈÓÍÎ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔ×ÉÛÖ×ÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÛØØÊ×ÉÉÛ×ÉÈÔ×ÈÓÙÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎÉÛÎØ ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÆÛÐÇ×ÉÛÎØÍÚÈÛÓÎÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ×ÙÍÏÌ×ÎÉÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÈÔ×ÇÉ×ÍÖÌÇÚÐÓÙÛÉÉ×ÈÉ ôÛÆ×ÃÍÇÌ×ÊÖÍÊÏ×ØÛÎÃÍÇÈÊ×ÛÙÔÉÈÇØÃÍÊÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉÊ×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÓÎÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÖÍÊÈÔÓÉÈÃÌ×ÍÖÈÊÓÛÐý ã×É îÍÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÔÍÅÃÍÇÛÉÙ×ÊÈÛÓÎ×ØÍÊÌÐÛÎÈÍÛÉÙ×ÊÈÛÓÎÈÔ×Ð×Æ×ÐÍÖÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÖÍÊÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×ÕÉÇÊÆ×ÃÉ ÌÇÚÐÓÙÔ×ÛÊÓÎÕÉÏ××ÈÓÎÕÉÅÓÈÔÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÕÊÍÇÌÉ×ÈÙ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÖÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×Ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÉÐ×Æ×ÐÍÖÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÖÍÊÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÐ×ÛÉ×ÚÊÓ×ÖÐÃÉÇÏÏÛÊÓÂ×ÛÎÃÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÙÍÏÏ×ÎÈÉÍÊÉÇÕÕ×ÉÈÓÍÎÉÃÍÇÅÍÇÐØÐÓÑ×ÈÍÏÛÑ×ÈÍõÍÍÕÐ×ÍÎÚ×ÔÛÐÖÍÖ ÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ø×ÌÐÍÃÏ×ÎÈÍÖÛÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÅÓØ×ÖÓÚ×ÊÎ×ÈÅÍÊÑÅÓÐÐÊ×ËÇÓÊ×õÍÍÕÐ×ÈÍÅÍÊÑÙÐÍÉ×ÐÃÅÓÈÔÐÍÙÛÐ ÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈ×ÎÈÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÍÊÕÛÎÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÉõÍÍÕÐ×É××ÑÉÈÍÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÍÅÎ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ ÈÔÛÈÏÛÃÛÉÉÓÉÈÓÎÈÔ×ÊÛÌÓØÉÏÍÍÈÔØ×ÌÐÍÃÏ×ÎÈÍÖÛÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÖÓÚ×ÊÍÌÈÓÙÎ×ÈÅÍÊÑóÎÈÔÓÉÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÅ× ÛÉÑÃÍÇÈÍÉÔÛÊ×ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÛÚÍÇÈÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÊÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÛÉÉ×ÈÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÈÔÛÈÏÛÃÚ×ÇÉ×Ø ÍÊÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×ØÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÉÇÙÔÛÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉØ×ÌÐÍÃÏ×ÎÈÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÊÐÃÈÔÍÉ×ÍÅÎ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈ ìÐ×ÛÉ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎØÛÉÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ÐÃÛÎØÛÙÙÇÊÛÈ×ÐÃÛÉÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ× ìÍÐ×ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈÉ ìÐ×ÛÉ×ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÈÔ××ÎÈÓÈÓ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÇÎÓÈÉÍÖÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÈÔÛÈÍÅÎÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÇÈÓÐÓÈÃÌÍÐ×ÉÓÎ ÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ ÷ÎÈÓÈÃîÛÏ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ îÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÌÍÐ×ÉÍÅÎ×ØÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÐ×ØÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÎÎÇÛÐÊÛÈ×Ì×ÊÌÍÐ×ÖÍÊÌÍÐ×ÛÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ ÚÃÈ×Ð×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÙÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÚÃÙÛÚÐ×ÉÃÉÈ×ÏÍÌ×ÊÛÈÍÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÷ÎÈÓÈÃîÛÏ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ îÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÌÍÐ×ÉÍÅÎ×ØÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÐ×ØÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÎÎÇÛÐÊÛÈ×Ì×ÊÌÍÐ×ÖÍÊÌÍÐ×ÛÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ ÚÃÈ×Ð×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÙÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÚÃÙÛÚÐ×ÉÃÉÈ×ÏÍÌ×ÊÛÈÍÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÷ÎÈÓÈÃîÛÏ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ îÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÌÍÐ×ÉÍÅÎ×ØÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÐ×ØÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÎÎÇÛÐÊÛÈ×Ì×ÊÌÍÐ×ÖÍÊÌÍÐ×ÛÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ ÚÃÈ×Ð×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÙÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÚÃÙÛÚÐ×ÉÃÉÈ×ÏÍÌ×ÊÛÈÍÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÖÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÅÓÐÐÏÛÑ×ÓÈÉÍÅÎÌÍÐ×ÉÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÖÍÊÛÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈÉÚÃõÍÍÕÐ×ÌÐ×ÛÉ××ÉÈÓÏÛÈ× ÈÔ×ÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖØÛÃÉÈÍÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÉÈ×ÌÉÛÉÉÇÏÓÎÕÖÇÐÐÙÍÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÖÊÍÏõÍÍÕÐ× î×ÕÍÈÓÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÏÛÉÈ×ÊÌÍÐ×ÛÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÉÉÇÛÎÙ×ÍÖÌ×ÊÏÓÈÉÖÍÊÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐÛÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÓÎÕÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÖÍÊÏÛÑ×Ê×ÛØÃÅÍÊÑÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÎÕÏÛÑ×Ê×ÛØÃÅÍÊÑÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÖÛÇÎÓÈÍÖÃÍÇÊÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÔÛÉÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÌÍÐ×ÉÍÅÎ×ØÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÐ×ØÚÃÈÔÓÊØÌÛÊÈÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÓÈÙÍÇÐØ ÏÛÑ×ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÈÍõÍÍÕÐ×ÌÐ×ÛÉ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ îÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÌÍÐ×ÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÷ÎÈÓÈÃÍÊ×ÎÈÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÍÅÎÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÈÔ×ÌÍÐ×ÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ êÛÈ×ÈÔÛÈÃÍÇÅÍÇÐØÙÔÛÊÕ×õÍÍÕÐ×Ì×ÊÌÍÐ×Ì×ÊÃ×ÛÊÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÛÎÃÊ×ÉÈÊÓÙÈÓÍÎÉÍÎÃÍÇÊÊÓÕÔÈÈÍÏÛÑ×ÉÇÙÔÌÍÐ×ÉÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÈÍõÍÍÕÐ× ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÐ×ÛÉ×ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÛÎÃÉÈÛÈ×ÍÊÐÍÙÛÐÐÛÅÉÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÉÊÇÐ×ÉÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÐ×ÕÛÐÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÈÔÛÈÕÍÆ×ÊÎÛÙÙ×ÉÉÛÎØÊÛÈ×ÉÖÍÊ ÛÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÐ×ÛÉ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÙÍÎÈÛÙÈÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÛÎÃ×ÎÈÓÈÓ×ÉÎÛÏ×ØÛÚÍÆ× ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ùÍÎØÇÓÈÉ ìÐ×ÛÉ×ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÈÔ××ÎÈÓÈÓ×ÉÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÇÎÓÈÉÍÖÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÈÔÛÈÍÅÎÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÇÈÓÐÓÈÃÙÍÎØÇÓÈÉÓÎ ÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ ÷ÎÈÓÈÃîÛÏ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ðÓÎ×ÛÊÖ××ÈÍÖÙÍÎØÇÓÈÍÅÎ×ØÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÐ×ØÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÎÎÇÛÐÊÛÈ×Ì×ÊÖÍÍÈÖÍÊÙÍÎØÇÓÈÇÉ× ÚÃÈ×Ð×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÙÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÚÃÙÛÚÐ×ÉÃÉÈ×ÏÍÌ×ÊÛÈÍÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÷ÎÈÓÈÃîÛÏ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ðÓÎ×ÛÊÖ××ÈÍÖÙÍÎØÇÓÈÍÅÎ×ØÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÐ×ØÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÎÎÇÛÐÊÛÈ×Ì×ÊÖÍÍÈÖÍÊÙÍÎØÇÓÈÇÉ× ÚÃÈ×Ð×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÙÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÚÃÙÛÚÐ×ÉÃÉÈ×ÏÍÌ×ÊÛÈÍÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÷ÎÈÓÈÃîÛÏ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ðÓÎ×ÛÊÖ××ÈÍÖÙÍÎØÇÓÈÍÅÎ×ØÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÐ×ØÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÎÎÇÛÐÊÛÈ×Ì×ÊÖÍÍÈÖÍÊÙÍÎØÇÓÈÇÉ× ÚÃÈ×Ð×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÙÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÚÃÙÛÚÐ×ÉÃÉÈ×ÏÍÌ×ÊÛÈÍÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÛÙÙ×ÉÉÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÊÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÖÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÅÓÐÐÏÛÑ×ÓÈÉÍÅÎÙÍÎØÇÓÈÉÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÖÍÊÇÉ×ÚÃõÍÍÕÐ×ÌÐ×ÛÉ××ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ÈÔ× ÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖØÛÃÉÈÍÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÉÈ×ÌÉÛÉÉÇÏÓÎÕÖÇÐÐÙÍÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÖÊÍÏõÍÍÕÐ× î×ÕÍÈÓÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÏÛÉÈ×ÊÙÍÎØÇÓÈÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÉÉÇÛÎÙ×ÍÖÌ×ÊÏÓÈÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÖÛÇÎÓÈÍÖÃÍÇÊÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÔÛÉÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÙÍÎØÇÓÈÍÅÎ×ØÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÐ×ØÚÃÈÔÓÊØÌÛÊÈÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÓÈ ÙÍÇÐØÏÛÑ×ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÈÍõÍÍÕÐ×ÌÐ×ÛÉ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ ðÓÎ×ÛÊÖ××ÈÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÷ÎÈÓÈÃÍÊ×ÎÈÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÍÅÎÍÊÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÈÔ×ÙÍÎØÇÓÈ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ êÛÈ×ÈÔÛÈÃÍÇÅÍÇÐØÙÔÛÊÕ×õÍÍÕÐ×Ì×ÊÐÓÎ×ÛÊÖÍÍÈÌ×ÊÃ×ÛÊÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÛÎÃÊ×ÉÈÊÓÙÈÓÍÎÉÍÎÃÍÇÊÊÓÕÔÈÈÍÏÛÑ×ÉÇÙÔÙÍÎØÇÓÈÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÈÍõÍÍÕÐ× ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÐ×ÛÉ×ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÐÍÙÛÐÐÛÅÉÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÉÊÇÐ×ÉÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÐ×ÕÛÐÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÈÔÛÈÕÍÆ×ÊÎÛÙÙ×ÉÉÊÓÕÔÈÉÛÎØÊÛÈ×ÉÖÍÊÙÍÎØÇÓÈ ÇÉ× ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÐ×ÛÉ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÙÍÎÈÛÙÈÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÛÎÃ×ÎÈÓÈÃÎÛÏ×ØÛÚÍÆ× ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÇÚÐÓÙêÓÕÔÈÉÍÖåÛÃ øÍ×ÉÃÍÇÊÐÍÙÛÐÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈØÓÊ×ÙÈÐÃÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÛÎØÛØÏÓÎÓÉÈ×ÊÈÔ×ÇÉ×ÍÖÛÐÐÌÇÚÐÓÙÊÓÕÔÈÉÍÖÅÛÃÅÓÈÔÓÎÓÈÉ ÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎýÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÛÎÃÍÈÔ×Ê×ÎÈÓÈÓ×ÉÈÔÛÈÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÛÎØÛØÏÓÎÓÉÈ×ÊÈÔ×ÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÊÓÕÔÈÉÍÖÅÛÃÓÎÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ åÓÈÔÊ×ÉÌ×ÙÈÈÍÃÍÇÊÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉÖÍÊÏÛÎÛÕÓÎÕÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÌÇÚÐÓÙÊÓÕÔÈÉÍÖÅÛÃÌÐ×ÛÉ××ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ÈÔ×ÎÇÏÚ×Ê ÍÖØÛÃÉÈÍÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÉÈ×ÌÉÛÉÉÇÏÓÎÕÖÇÐÐÙÍÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÖÊÍÏõÍÍÕÐ× î×ÕÍÈÓÛÈÓÍÎÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐÛÎØÓÉÉÇÛÎÙ×ÍÖÛÏÛÉÈ×ÊÊÓÕÔÈÍÖÅÛÃÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÉÉÇÛÎÙ×ÍÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÌ×ÊÏÓÈÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÍÉÈÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÎÉÌ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÐ×ÛÉ×ÓÎØÓÙÛÈ×ÈÔ×ÛÏÍÇÎÈÍÊÏ×ÈÔÍØÍÖÙÛÐÙÇÐÛÈÓÎÕÛÐÐÖ××ÉÛÎØÙÔÛÊÕ×ÉÖÍÊÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÊÓÕÔÈÉ ÍÖÅÛÃÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÓÖÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ× ûÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÖ××ÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ðÓÎ×ÛÊÖÍÍÈÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÇÉÛÕ×Ö××ÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÎÉÌ×ÙÈÓÍÎÖ××ÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ íÈÔ×ÊÖ××ÉÍÊÙÔÛÊÕ×ÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÉ×ÎÉÓÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ìÐ×ÛÉ×Ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÛÎÃÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÉÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÐÃÍÊ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐÐÃÉ×ÎÉÓÈÓÆ×ÛÊ×ÛÉ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÐ×ÛÉ×Ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÃÍÇÊÇÎØ×ÊÕÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÌÐÛÎÉÛÎØÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÓÖÛÎÃ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÐ×ÛÉ×ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÇÎÓËÇ×ÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÉÊÇÐ×ÉÌÍÐÓÙÃÉÈÛÈ×Ï×ÎÈÉÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÐ×ÕÛÐÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÈÍÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ ÈÔÛÈõÍÍÕÐ×ÅÍÇÐØÔÛÆ×ÈÍÙÍÏÌÐÃÓÎØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÓÎÕÛÖÓÚ×ÊÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ôÛÉÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÅÍÊÑ×ØÅÓÈÔÉÈÇØÓ×ØÍÊ×ÆÛÐÇÛÈ×ØÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÈÃÌ×ÉÍÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÏ×ÈÔÍØÉÖÍÊ ÖÓÚ×ÊÈÍÈÔ×ÔÍÏ×Î×ÈÅÍÊÑÉ û×ÊÓÛÐÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ èÊ×ÎÙÔÓÎÕÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ úÍÊÓÎÕÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ïÓÙÊÍÈÊ×ÎÙÔÓÎÕÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÐÍÅÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ êÍÙÑéÛÅÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ùÔ×ÙÑÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÏ×ÈÔÍØÉÍÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ û×ÊÓÛÐÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ èÊ×ÎÙÔÓÎÕÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ úÍÊÓÎÕÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ïÓÙÊÍÈÊ×ÎÙÔÓÎÕÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÐÍÅÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ êÍÙÑéÛÅÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ îÍÎ× íÈÔ×ÊÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûÊ×ÈÔ×Ê×ÍÈÔ×ÊÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÏ×ÈÔÍØÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÖÍÊÇÉ×ÓÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÖÓÚ×ÊÈÍÈÔ×ÔÍÏ×ÍÊÍÈÔ×Ê È×Ð×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÎ×ÈÅÍÊÑÉÓÎÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃýóÖÉÍÌÐ×ÛÉ×ÐÓÉÈÈÔ×ÏÚ×ÐÍÅ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÐ×ÛÉ×Ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÈÔ×ÐÍÙÛÐÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÍÊÃÍÚÐÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÉÓÖÛÎÃÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØÛÌÌÐÃÈÍõÍÍÕÐ×ÓÖÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅ×ÎÈÖÍÊÅÛÊØÓÎ ÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ìÐ×ÛÉ×Ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÐÍÙÛÐÚÇÉÓÎ×ÉÉÍÚÐÓÕÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÎØÈÛÄ×É Ö××ÉÓÖÛÎÃÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØÛÌÌÐÃÈÍõÍÍÕÐ×ÓÖÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÅ×ÎÈ ÖÍÊÅÛÊØÓÎÃÍÇÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ öÍÊÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÉÛÎØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÕÊÍÇÌÉ÷ÄÔÓÚÓÈú ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØÖÓ×ÐØÉ ãÍÇÊÎÛÏ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ãÍÇÊÍÊÕÛÎÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÍÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÕÊÍÇÌÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÖÃÍÇÛÊ×Ê×ÉÌÍÎØÓÎÕÍÎÚ×ÔÛÐÖÍÖÛÎÍÊÕÛÎÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÍÊÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÕÊÍÇÌÌÐ×ÛÉ×Ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÓÈ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ùÓÈÃÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ éÈÛÈ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ åÔÃÉÔÍÇÐØõÍÍÕÐ×ÚÇÓÐØÛÖÓÚ×ÊÈÍÈÔ×ÔÍÏ×Î×ÈÅÍÊÑÅÔ×Ê×ÃÍÇÐÓÆ×ý ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ å×ÚÐÓÎÑÈÍÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÓÎÕÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐãÍÇèÇÚ×ÆÓØ×ÍÉÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÙÊ×ÛÈÓÆ×ÉÇÚÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÛÊ××ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ×Ø ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ùÔ×ÙÑÛÎÃ ÛÐÐÈÔÛÈÛÌÌÐÃ åÔÛÈÑÓÎØÍÖóÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉÛÊ×ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ×ÅÔ×Ê×ÃÍÇÐÓÆ×ý øÓÛÐÇÌÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ øéðÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ùÛÚÐ×ÏÍØ×ÏÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ öÓÚ×ÊÈÍÈÔ×ÔÍÏ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ åÓÊ×Ð×ÉÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ íÈÔ×ÊÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ îÍÎ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ øÍÎÈÑÎÍÅÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ åÔÛÈÑÓÎØÍÖóÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ØÍÃÍÇÌÊÓÏÛÊÓÐÃÇÉ×ÛÈÔÍÏ×ý îÍÎ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ øÓÛÐÇÌÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ øéðÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ùÛÚÐ×ÏÍØ×ÏÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ öÓÚ×ÊÈÍÈÔ×ÔÍÏ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ åÓÊ×Ð×ÉÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ íÈÔ×ÊÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ øÍÎÈÑÎÍÅÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ åÔÛÈÙÍÏÌÛÎÃÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÉÃÍÇÊÔÍÏ×óÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ý ûèèéúùÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ æ×ÊÓÂÍÎÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ëÅ×ÉÈÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ùÍÏÙÛÉÈÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ êÍÛØêÇÎÎ×ÊèÓÏ×åÛÊÎ×ÊÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ùÔÛÊÈ×ÊÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ùÍÄÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ùÛÚÐ×ÆÓÉÓÍÎÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ûíðÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÷ÛÊÈÔðÓÎÑÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ î×Èâ×ÊÍòÇÎÍúÐÇ×ðÓÕÔÈÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ù×ÎÈÇÊÃðÓÎÑù×ÎÈÇÊÃè×Ð÷ÏÚÛÊËÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ íÈÔ×ÊÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ åÔÛÈÓÉÈÔ×ÛØÆ×ÊÈÓÉ×ØÉÌ××ØÍÖÃÍÇÊÔÍÏ×óÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ýìÐ×ÛÉ×ÊÍÇÎØÈÍÈÔ×Î×ÛÊ×ÉÈÏ×ÕÛÚÓÈÌ×Ê É×ÙÍÎØïÚÌÉ ð×ÉÉÈÔ×ÎïÚÌÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ïÚÌÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ïÚÌÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ïÚÌÉÍÊÖÛÉÈ×ÊÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ øÍÎÈÑÎÍÅÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ åÔÛÈÓÉÃÍÇÊÛÙÈÇÛÐØÍÅÎÐÍÛØÉÌ××ØØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ××Æ×ÎÓÎÕý ãÍÇÙÛÎÇÉ×ÛÈÔÓÊØÌÛÊÈÃÅ×ÚÉÓÈ×ÐÓÑ×éÌ××ØÈ×ÉÈÎ×ÈÍÊúÛÎØÅÓØÈÔÌÐÛÙ×ÙÍÏÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÈÍÍÐÉÛÈ ï×ÛÉÇÊ×Ï×ÎÈðÛÚÈÍÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÃÍÇÊÛÙÈÇÛÐØÍÅÎÐÍÛØÛÎØÇÌÐÍÛØÉÌ××ØÉ ð×ÉÉÈÔ×ÎïÚÌÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ïÚÌÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ïÚÌÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ïÚÌÉÍÊÖÛÉÈ×ÊÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ øÍÎÈÑÎÍÅÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ åÔÛÈÓÉÃÍÇÊÛÙÈÇÛÐÇÌÐÍÛØÉÌ××ØØÇÊÓÎÕÈÔ××Æ×ÎÓÎÕý ãÍÇÙÛÎÇÉ×ÛÈÔÓÊØÌÛÊÈÃÅ×ÚÉÓÈ×ÐÓÑ×éÌ××ØÈ×ÉÈÎ×ÈÍÊúÛÎØÅÓØÈÔÌÐÛÙ×ÙÍÏÍÊÍÈÔ×ÊÈÍÍÐÉÛÈ ï×ÛÉÇÊ×Ï×ÎÈðÛÚÈÍÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÃÍÇÊÛÙÈÇÛÐØÍÅÎÐÍÛØÛÎØÇÌÐÍÛØÉÌ××ØÉ ð×ÉÉÈÔ×ÎïÚÌÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ïÚÌÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ïÚÌÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ïÚÌÉÍÊÖÛÉÈ×ÊÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ øÍÎÈÑÎÍÅÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ôÍÅÏÇÙÔØÍ×ÉÃÍÇÊóÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÙÍÉÈÌ×ÊÏÍÎÈÔý öÊ××ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ð×ÉÉÈÔ×Î ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÍÊÏÍÊ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ óÉÃÍÇÊóÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÚÇÎØÐ×ØÅÓÈÔÍÈÔ×ÊÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉÐÓÑ×èæÛÎØÌÔÍÎ×ý ã×ÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ îÍÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ôÍÅÏÛÎÃÈÓÏ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÐÛÉÈÏÍÎÈÔØÓØÃÍÇÊÔÓÕÔÉÌ××ØóÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÎÍÈÅÍÊÑÙÍÊÊ×ÙÈÐÃÉÐÍÅØÍÅÎÍÊ ÖÊÇÉÈÊÛÈ×ÃÍÇý î×Æ×ÊÓÈtÉÕÊ×ÛÈÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÈÍÈÓÏ×ÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÈÍ ÈÓÏ×ÉÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ïÍÊ×ÈÔÛÎ úÍÍÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ÈÔ×ËÇÛÐÓÈÃÍÖÃÍÇÊÔÍÏ×óÎÈ×ÊÎ×ÈÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÙÇÉÈÍÏ×ÊÉÇÌÌÍÊÈ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ åÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØÃÍÇÐÓÑ×ÈÍÉ××ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×ØÛÚÍÇÈÃÍÇÊÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ýùÔ×ÙÑÛÐÐÈÔÛÈÛÌÌÐÃ ðÍÅ×ÊÌÊÓÙ×ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ öÛÉÈ×ÊÉÌ××ØÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ôÓÕÔ×ÊÊ×ÐÓÛÚÓÐÓÈÃÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ ú×ÈÈ×ÊÙÇÉÈÍÏ×ÊÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝ SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:AGENDA ITEM: March 3, 2010 DEPARTMENT:CITY MANAGER: City Manager’s OfficeDave Anderson PREPARED BY:DIRECTOR: Crystal MorrowBarbara Powell Administrative Analyst IIAssistant City Manager SUBJECT:Resolution Authorizing ABAG to accept State Energy Program Funds on Behalf of the City of Saratoga RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept reportand approve the attached resolution authorizing the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) to accept State Energy Program (SEP) funds on behalf of the City for a residential energy efficiency audit and retrofit program. BACKGROUND: At the December 2, 2009 City Council Meeting, the Council authorized the City Manager to sign a letter of commitment to participate in a residential energy efficiency audit and retrofit program being developed by ABAG. At that time Council was informed that the City would need to pass a resolution authorizing ABAG to receive SEP funds on behalf of the City. Earlier this month,the State announced that ABAG had been awarded SEP funds to develop a residential energy efficiency audit and retrofit program. Consequently, ABAG has asked all participating municipalities to pass resolutions authorizing ABAG to accept SEP monies. FISCAL IMPACTS: Staff time may be needed to support the development and implementation of the ABAG home energy efficiency audit and retrofit program CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING THE RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: The resolution will not be passed and the City of Saratoga may be excluded from participating in the residential home energy efficiency audit and retrofit program that will be developed and funded with SEP monies. ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S): N/A Page 1of 2 FOLLOW UP ACTION(S): Implement Council direction. ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT: Nothing additional. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A:Resolution authorizing ABAG to accept SEP funds on behalf of the City of Saratoga Attachment B:December 2, 2009 staff report on the ABAG residential energy efficiency audit and retrofit program letter of commitment Page 2of 2 RESOLUTION NO. ________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA AUTHORIZING THE ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS TO ACCEPT STATE ENERGY PROGRAM FUNDS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY WHEREAS ,the City of Saratoga recognizes that it is in the interest of local, regional, state, and federal agencies to stimulate the economy; create and retain jobs; reduce fossil fuel emissions; and reduce total energy usage and improve energy efficiency; and WHEREAS ,the City of Saratoga has committed to an ongoing, coordinated effort to reduce the emissions that cause global warming, improve air quality, reduce waste, cut energy use and save money; and WHEREAS ,State Energy Program (SEP) funds are available through the California Energy Commissions’ SEP FundingOpportunities for grants to eligible local governments for cost-effective energy efficiency projects; and WHEREAS , the SEP allows for public agencies or non-profit entities to apply for funds on behalf of eligible local governments; and WHEREAS ,the City of Saratoga is eligible for SEP funding under the California Energy Commissions’ SEP Program; and WHEREAS ,the City of Saratoga has collaborated with the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) to submit a regional application to implementthe energy efficiency project described in Exhibit A for the purpose of qualifying for SEP funds from the California Energy Commission; and WHEREAS ,the City of Saratoga has considered the application of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to the approval ofthe energy efficiency projectdescribed in Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Councilof the City of Saratogathat in compliance with CEQA, the Cityfinds that the approval of the energy efficiency projectdescribed in ExhibitA is a “project” under CEQA that is categorically exempt under California Code of Regulations, Title 14, section 15301 (repairs and minor alterations to existing structures and facilities), because the project would develop standards for resource conservation and energy saving retrofits of existing structures involving negligible or no expansion of existing uses; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that if recommended for funding by the California Energy Commission the City of Saratoga authorizes ABAG to accept agrant award on its behalf and to enter into all necessary contracts and agreements, and amendments thereto, on its behalf to implement and carry out the projectdescribed in Exhibit A; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Saratoga recognizes theCounty ofSanta Clara as the leadlocal implementer for projectdescribed in Exhibit A for all the local governments in Santa Clara County, and that ABAG as the fiscal agent, will disburse the funds to Santa Clara County to implement and carry out the projectdescribed in Exhibit A. rd PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Saratoga City Council at a regular meeting held on the 3day of March 2010by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _______________________________ Kathleen M. King,Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Ann Sullivan,City Clerk ß¬¬¿½¸³»²¬ ßæ Î»¬®±º·¬ Þ¿§ ß®»¿ Ý±³°®»¸»²·ª» Î»·¼»²¬·¿´ Þ«·´¼·²¹ Î»¬®±º·¬ Ð®±¹®¿³ Í«³³¿®§ ±º ¹®¿²¬ °®±°±¿´ «¾³·¬¬»¼ ¾§ ßÞßÙ ¬± ¬¸» Ý¿´·º±®²·¿ Û²»®¹§ Ý±³³··±² ±² Ü»½»³¾»® îïô îððç Ü»½®·°¬·±² ±º Ð®±°±»¼ Ð®±¹®¿³ Ì¸» ß±½·¿¬·±² ±º Þ¿§ ß®»¿ Ù±ª»®²³»²¬ øßÞßÙ÷ · ½±´´¿¾±®¿¬·²¹ ©·¬¸ »·¹¸¬ Þ¿§ ß®»¿ ½±«²¬·» ¬± »¬¿¾´·¸ ¿ ½±³°®»¸»²·ª» ®»·¼»²¬·¿´ ·²¹´»óº¿³·´§ ¿²¼ ³«´¬·º¿³·´§ ¾«·´¼·²¹ ®»¬®±º·¬ °®±¹®¿³ ¬¸¿¬ ´»ª»®¿¹» ®»¹·±²¿´ ½±±°»®¿¬·±² ¿²¼ º«²¼·²¹ ©¸·´» »²¿¾´·²¹ ¿«¬±²±³§ ¿¬ ¬¸» ´±½¿´ ´»ª»´ò Ì¸» °®±°±»¼ ßÞßÙ °®±¹®¿³ ¿´·¹² ©·¬¸ ´±½¿´ô ®»¹·±²¿´ ¿²¼ ²¿¬·±²¿´ ¹±¿´ ±º °®±³±¬·²¹ »½±²±³·½ ª·¬¿´·¬§ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ¿² ·²½®»¿» ·² ¹®»»² ¶±¾ô ®»¼«½·²¹ ËòÍò ±·´ ¼»°»²¼»²½§ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ·²½®»¿» ·² »²»®¹§ »ºº·½·»²½§ ¿²¼ ¼»°´±§³»²¬ ±º ®»²»©¿¾´» »²»®¹§ ¬»½¸²±´±¹·»ô ¿²¼ ®»¼«½·²¹ ¹®»»²¸±«» ¹¿ »³··±²ò Ñ² ¾»¸¿´º ±º ß´¿³»¼¿ô Ý±²¬®¿ Ý±¬¿ô Ó¿®·²ô Í¿² Ú®¿²½·½±ô Í¿² Ó¿¬»±ô Í¿²¬¿ Ý´¿®¿ô Í±´¿²± ¿²¼ Í±²±³¿ Ý±«²¬·»ô ßÞßÙ «¾³·¬¬»¼ ¿ °®±°±¿´ ¬± ¬¸» Ý¿´·º±®²·¿ Û²»®¹§ Ý±³³··±² Í¬¿¬» Û²»®¹§ Ð®±¹®¿³ øÍÛÐ÷ ¬± ®»½»·ª» üïðòè ³·´´·±² ·² ß³»®·½¿² Î»½±ª»®§ ¿²¼ Î»·²ª»¬³»²¬ ß½¬ øßÎÎß÷ ¹®¿²¬ º«²¼ ¿¼³·²·¬»®»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» ËòÍò Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬ ±º Û²»®¹§ò Ì¸· ¹®¿²¬ °®±¹®¿³ô µ²±©² ·²º±®³¿´´§ ¿ ÍÛÐ î ¬± ¼·¬·²¹«·¸ ·¬ º®±³ ¬¸®»» ±¬¸»® »´»³»²¬ ±º Ý¿´·º±®²·¿ ÍÛÐ °®±¹®¿³ô ®«² º®±³ Ú»¾®«¿®§ ïïô îðïð ¬± Ó¿®½¸ íïô îðïîò Ì¸» ßÎÎßñÍÛÐ î ¹®¿²¬ º«²¼ ©±«´¼ ¾» «»¼ ¾§ ßÞßÙ °®±¹®¿³ °¿®¬·½·°¿²¬ ¬± ½¿®®§ ±«¬ ´±½¿´ ¿²¼ Þ¿§ ß®»¿ó©·¼» ½±²«³»® ±«¬®»¿½¸ ¿²¼ »¼«½¿¬·±² ½¿³°¿·¹² ¿²¼ ©±®µº±®½» ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ¿½¬·ª·¬·» ¬¸¿¬ ©·´´ ¿½½»´»®¿¬» ¼»³¿²¼ º±® ¸±³» »²»®¹§ ®»¬®±º·¬ ¿²¼ »¨°¿²¼ ¬¸» ®»¹·±²¿´ ¾«·´¼·²¹ ·²¼«¬®§ ½¿°¿½·¬§ ¬± ¼»´·ª»®§ ¸·¹¸ó¯«¿´·¬§ô ½±¬ó»ºº»½¬·ª» ®»¬®±º·¬ »®ª·½»ò Ì± ¿½¸·»ª» ¬¸»» ¹±¿´ô Î»¬®±º·¬ Þ¿§ ß®»¿ ¸¿ ·¼»²¬·º·»¼ ¿ »¬ ±º ¬¸®»» ½±®» °®±¹®¿³ ±¾¶»½¬·ª»æ ïòÐ®±ª·¼» Ð®±°»®¬§ ß»»¼ Ý´»¿² Û²»®¹§ øÐßÝÛ÷ º·²¿²½·²¹ ¬± ¿¼¼®» ¬¸» ¸·¹¸ «°º®±²¬ ½±¬ ±º ®»¬®±º·¬ô ©¸·½¸ »²¿¾´» ¸±³»±©²»® ¬± º·²¿²½» »²»®¹§ »ºº·½·»²½§ ®»¬®±º·¬ ¿²¼ ®»²»©¿¾´» »²»®¹§ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ¿»³»²¬ °¿·¼ ª·¿ ¬¸»·® °®±°»®¬§ ¬¿¨»ò îòÜ»³±²¬®¿¬» ³±®» »ºº»½¬·ª» ³¿®µ»¬·²¹ ¿²¼ ±«¬®»¿½¸ ³»¬¸±¼ ¬± ·²º±®³ ¿²¼ ³±¬·ª¿¬» °®±°»®¬§ ±©²»® °¿®¬·½·°¿¬·±²ò íòÍ¬®»¿³´·²» °¿®¬·½·°¿²¬ô ½±²¬®¿½¬±®ô ¿²¼ ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±² °®±½»» ¬± ®»¼«½» ¬¸» ¸·¹¸ ¬®¿²¿½¬·±² ½±¬ ¿²¼ ¾«·´¼ ¿ ¯«¿´·¬§ þ¹®»»²þ ©±®µº±®½»ò Ì¸» ßÞßÙ °®±¹®¿³ ¬¸»®»¾§ ©·´´ ½±³°´»³»²¬ »¨·¬·²¹ ¿²¼ °´¿²²»¼ ´±½¿´ ®»¬®±º·¬ ¿½¬·ª·¬·»ò Ð®±¹®¿³ Ð¿®¬·½·°¿²¬ ¿²¼ Î±´» ParticipantRole Association of Bay Area GovernmentsFiscal agent and contract administrator Alameda County (StopWaste.Org) and Regional tasks and local retrofit program Sonoma County (Sonoma County implementation Transportation Authority) Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco, San Local retrofit program implementation Mateo, Santa Clara and Solano Counties Bevilacqua Knight, Inc., Build It Green and Regional and local implementation assistance, California Building Performance Contractors quality assurance and reporting Association Ì¸» Ý±«²¬§ ±º Í¿²¬¿ Ý´¿®¿ Î±´» Ì¸» Ý±«²¬§ ±º Í¿²¬¿ Ý´¿®¿ ¸¿ ®»°®»»²¬»¼ ¬¸» ·²¬»®»¬ ±º ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ ¿²¼ ·¬ ½·¬·» ·² ©±®µ·²¹ ©·¬¸ ßÞßÙ ¬± ¼»ª»´±° ¿ ®»¹·±²¿´ »²»®¹§ °®±¹®¿³ ¿²¼ · ©±®µ·²¹ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ½·¬·» ¬± ¼»ª»´±° ¿ ½±«²¬§©·¼» »´»³»²¬ ¬¸¿¬ ©·´´ ¾»½±³» ¬¸» Í¿²¬¿ Ý´¿®¿ Ý±«²¬§ Î»·¼»²¬·¿´ Î»¬®±º·¬ Ð®±¹®¿³ øÍÝÝÎÎÐ÷ò ×º¹®¿²¬ º«²¼·²¹ · ¿©¿®¼»¼ ¬± ßÞßÙô Í¿²¬¿ Ý´¿®¿ Ý±«²¬§ ©·´´ ®»½»·ª» ³±®» ¬¸¿² üïôçëðôððð º±® ¬¸» ÍÝÝÎÎÐ ¬± ·³°´»³»²¬ ´±½¿´ »ºº±®¬ ¬± °®±³±¬» »²»®¹§ ¿«¼·¬ ¿²¼ ®»¬®±º·¬ º±® ¬¸» ®»·¼»²¬·¿´ »½¬±® ·² ¿´´ ¬¸» ½·¬·» ¿²¼ «²·²½±®°±®¿¬»¼ ¿®»¿ ±º ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ò Ì¸» Ý±«²¬§ · °®±ª·¼·²¹ ¿ ¹®¿²¬ °®±½» º±® ²±²°®±º·¬ô ¾«·²»»ô ¸±«·²¹ ¿¹»²½·»ô «¬·´·¬·» ¿²¼ ½±²«´¬·²¹ º·®³ ¬±°®±ª·¼» »²»®¹§ ¿«¼·¬ ¬± ¬¸» ®»·¼»²¬·¿´ ½±³³«²·¬§ò Ì¸» ÍÝÝÎÎÐ ©·´´ ½±²·¬ ±º ¿ «·¬» ±º »²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ °®±¹®¿³ ¿²¼ ·²º±®³¿¬·±²ô ·²½´«¼·²¹ ÐßÝÛ º·²¿²½·²¹ ±°¬·±²ô ¬¸¿¬ ©·´´ ¾» «²·º±®³´§ °¿½µ¿¹»¼ô ³¿®µ»¬»¼ ¿²¼ °®»»²¬»¼ ¬± Ý±«²¬§ ½±²¬·¬«»²¬ò Ì¸» »²»®¹§ ¿«¼·¬ ¿®» »¨°»½¬»¼ ¬± ¬·³«´¿¬» ·²¬»®»¬ ·² ½±³°®»¸»²·ª» ¸±³» ®»¬®±º·¬ «½¸ ¿ ¿¼¼»¼ ·²«´¿¬·±²ô ©»¿¬¸»®·¦¿¬·±²ô ¸»¿¬·²¹ô ª»²¬·´¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ¿·® ½±²¼·¬·±²·²¹ «°¹®¿¼»ô ²»© ©·²¼±© ¿²¼ »²»®¹§ »ºº·½·»²¬ ¿°°´·¿²½»ô ®»«´¬·²¹ ·² ·¹²·º·½¿²¬ ®»¼«½¬·±² ·² »²»®¹§ ¿²¼ ©¿¬»® ½±²«³°¬·±²ò Ì¸» ²»¿®´§ üî ³·´´·±² ¬¸¿¬ ©·´´ ¾» ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» º±® ¬¸» ÍÝÝÎÎÐ ©·´´ º«²¼ ¬©± Ý±«²¬§ ¬¿ºº °±·¬·±² ¿²¼ ª¿®·±« °®±¹®¿³ò ßÞßÙ · »»µ·²¹ ¬± º¿½·´·¬¿¬» ïéôððð ®»¬®±º·¬ ·² ¬¸» Þ¿§ ß®»¿ ¼«®·²¹ ¬¸» ¹®¿²¬ ½§½´»ô ©·¬¸ ¿² ¿ª»®¿¹» ±º îðû »²»®¹§ ®»¼«½¬·±²ò Þ¿»¼ ±² ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ ¸¿ª·²¹ îêû ±º ¬¸» °±°«´¿¬·±² ±º ¬¸» »·¹¸¬ °¿®¬·½·°¿¬·²¹ ½±«²¬·»ô ¬¸» ÍÝÝÎÎÐ ©·´´ ¿·³ º±® ìôíëç ®»¬®±º·¬ò ×¬ · °®±¶»½¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸· ©±®µ ©·´´ ®»«´¬ ·² ììê ²»© ¶±¾ô üïòé ³·´´·±² ¿ª»¼ ·² »²»®¹§ ½±¬º±® ¸±³»±©²»®ô ïðð ¾·´´·±² ®»¼«½¬·±² ±º ÞÌËô ¿²¼ üìíòè ³·´´·±² °»²¬ ·² ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ò Ì¸» ÍÝÝÎÎÐ ©·´´ ²±¬ ½¸¿²¹» ¬¸» °»®³·¬¬·²¹ ±® ¾«·´¼·²¹ ·²°»½¬·±² °®±½»» ©·¬¸·² ¬¸» Ý±«²¬§ô ¿²¼ ©·´´ »»µ ¬± ·²º±®³ ¿²¼ »¼«½¿¬» ®»·¼»²¬ ±² ¬»° ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸»§ ½¿² ¬¿µ» ¬± ®»¼«½» ¬¸»·® »²»®¹§ ½±²«³°¬·±² ¿²¼ ©¿¬»® «¿¹»ò Î»·¼»²¬ ©¸± °¿®¬·½·°¿¬» ·² ¬¸» °®±¹®¿³ ¿²¼ ¸¿ª» »²»®¹§ ¿«¼·¬ °»®º±®³»¼ ±² ¬¸»·® ¸±³» ©·´´ ¾» »²½±«®¿¹»¼ ¬± ·³°´»³»²¬ ¬¸» ¬»° ®»½±³³»²¼»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» »²»®¹§ ¿«¼·¬ ¿²¼ «°¹®¿¼» ¬¸»·® ¸±³» ¬± ¾» ³±®» »²»®¹§ »ºº·½·»²¬ ¿²¼ ¬± ½±²«³» ´» ©¿¬»®ò SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: December 2, 2009 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER: City Manager’s Office Dave Anderson PREPARED BY: DIRECTOR: Crystal Morrow Barbara Powell Administrative Analyst II Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Association of Bay Area Governments Residential Energy Efficiency Audit and Retrofit Program RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept report and authorize the City Manager to sign the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) residential energy efficiency audit and retrofit program letter of commitment. BACKGROUND: State Energy Program – Residential Building Energy Audit and Retrofit Programs As part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the State of California has received $226 million for the State Energy Program (SEP). Of this money, $95 million will be used to fund an Energy Efficiency Program that will provide grants to qualified organizations for municipal financing programs (SEP1) like CaliforniaFIRST, residential building energy audit and retrofit programs (SEP2), and municipal and commercial energy retrofit programs (SEP3). The State’s SEP funds are being administered by the California Energy Commission. SEP applications are due to the State by December 21, 2009. SEP2 – ABAG Home Energy Efficiency Audit and Retrofit Program ABAG is leading a regional effort to apply for $10-$12 million in SEP2 funds to create a regional home energy audit and retrofit program that will benefit all of the Bay Area counties. Although the exact programs and functions of the ABAG program have not been defined at this time, the program will be focused on establishing home energy audit and retrofit standards in the Bay Area, workforce development, marketing and outreach, and quality assurance. Ultimately, the program is intended to create green jobs, increase use and development of clean energy technologies, promote the local economy, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Letter of Commitment The California Energy Commission is requiring that all of the cities that intend to participate in the ABAG program submit a letter of commitment. The letter of commitment is due to ABAG in December 2009, so that it may be included in ABAG’s application for SEP funds. The letter of commitment: -Indicates that the City is in support of ABAG’s application for SEP2 funds -Authorizes ABAG as the lead agency in submitting the application Page 1 of 2 -Supports the County of Santa Clara as the lead agency in implementing ABAG’s home energy efficiency audit and retrofit program in Santa Clara County -States the City will participate in program development and implementation in Saratoga and throughout the region -Indicates the City will provide a resolution authorizing ABAG to act as the lead agency in applying for and receiving SEP2 funds on behalf of Saratoga, contingent upon the selection of ABAG’s proposal for funding FISCAL IMPACTS: There are no fiscal impacts associated with approving the letter of commitment. However, staff time may need to be dedicated to the development and implementation of the ABAG home energy efficiency audit and retrofit program if SEP2 money is awarded to the program. CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING THE RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: The City will not submit a letter of commitment for the ABAG home energy audit and retrofit program and may not be eligible for services proved through the program if it receives SEP2 funds. ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S): N/A FOLLOW UP ACTION(S): Implement Council direction. ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT: Nothing additional. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Letter of Commitment to the ABAG home energy efficiency audit and retrofit program Attachment B: State Energy Program Chart Page 2 of 2 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:AGENDA ITEM: March 3, 2010 DEPARTMENT:CITY MANAGER: City Manager’s OfficeDave Anderson PREPARED BY:DIRECTOR: Crystal MorrowBarbara Powell Administrative Analyst IIAssistant City Manager SUBJECT:Process for Allocation of Community Events Fund RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept report and select aprocessfor allocating community event funds. BACKGROUND: At the February 17, 2010 City Council Meeting, direction was given to staff to bring back options for formalizing allocation of the City’s Community Events Fund. The distribution of the Community Events Fund from fiscal year 2005/06to the current fiscal year is included in Attachment A. The fund has been used for a variety of eventsin past years, including: -City events, such as park openings, Arbor Day, and the Community Garage Sale -Special events coordinated by members of the community, such as Taste of Saratoga, the Mustard Faire, the Memorial Day event, and the Fourth of July celebration Staff has prepared several options to formalizeallocation of Community Events Fund. These options are listed below for Council consideration. Option 1: Formally adopt the current practiceof allocating money in the Status QuoCommunity Event Fund through the budget process. Option 2:Continue to provide City support and sponsorship for Traditional Event Applicationestablished community events that have received City funding or assistance in the past. Require event organizers for these events to submit an application. The Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)and Community Grant application could be used as a template for the Community Event Fund application(see Attachment B). Council wouldreview applications todeterminewhich events to support and funding amountsfor selected events. Page 1of 3 Option 3: Hold an open application process in which traditionaland new Open Application Processcommunity event organizers couldseek City sponsorship and monies from the Community Events Fund. The CDBGand Community Grant application could be used as an application for the Community Event Fund application. Council wouldreview applications todetermine which events to support and funding amountsfor selected events. Option 4: Solicit applications from traditional event organizers. Council Prioritize Traditional Eventswould thenreview applications todetermine which events to support and the funding amountfor selected events. If there is remaining money after funds have been allocated to established events, applications for new events wouldbe considered. The CDBG and Community Grant application could be used as an application for the Community Event Fund application. FISCAL IMPACTS: Should the Council select option 2, 3, or 4, staff time will be required to formalize the application process, solicit applications, and prepare applications for Council to review. However, establishing a process for allocation of Community Event Funds that coincides with the budget process willprovide for a better understanding of the needs of community event organizers that may consequently reduce the number of budget requests related to events that go before the City Council. Additionally, Council may want to consider providing direction to staff on the total funding amount for community events in the proposed budget for the next fiscal year. The amount of money set aside in the Community Event Fund has varied, but since fiscal year 2006/07it has typically ranged from approximately $12,000 to $15,000. CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING THE RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: There will be no formalized process for determining Community Event Fund allocations. ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S): N/A FOLLOW UP ACTION(S): Implement Council direction. Page 2of 3 ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT: Nothing additional. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A:Community Events Fund distribution from fiscal year 2006/07to the current fiscal year Attachment B: CDBG/Community Grants application Page 3of 3 Community Event Fund From Fiscal Year 2006/07 to 2009/10 2006/072007/082008/092009/102009/10 ActualActualActualBudgetedEstimated Chamber of Commerce Events Celebrate Saratoga - Teen Scene 7,527 10,000 - - - Celebrate Saratoga - Fun Zone 4,900 4,900 - - - Celebrate Saratoga - Event Support 4,996 - - - - Celebrate Saratoga Banner - - - - - Taste of Saratoga 3,299 - - - - Saratoga Art & Wine Festival 5,000 - - - 4 ,258 Annual Tree Lighting - - - - 1 ,037 General Community Events Unspecified Event Funding 5,000 - - - - Neighborhood Block Party Supp - - - - - Month of the Child Celebration - - - - - Mustard Faire 1,418 2,000 3,649 - 4 ,000 Sister City 25th Anniversary 1,200 - - - - Arbor Day Celebration 78 100 - - 1 00 Memorial Day Event (Banner) 300 - - - - Fourth of July Event 1,547 4,000 - - - Cancer Society - Relay 200 - - - - Citywide Garage Sale 4,270 5,000 - - 5 ,000 Facility Opening Events Fellowship Hall Opening - - - - 1 04 de Anza Trail Opening 23 - - - - KMP Groundbreaking / Opening 250 - - - 1 38 Total Community Events 13,845 22,396 12,866 20,550 1 4,637 FY 2010-2011 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY GRANT & CDBG STANDARD APPLICATION DATE: __________________ Application Instructions Sheet Please refer to the for details on the following questions. Please limit your answers to one paragraph per question 1) Applicant Organization/Agency Name: _____________________________________ Agency Address: _________________________________________________________ Executive Director: _______________________________________________________ Phone: ________________ Fax: _________________ E-Mail: _____________________ Agency is a Faith Based Organization: ____ Yes ____ No 2) Program Title : __________________________________________________________ Program Address: _________________________________________________________ Contact Person/Title: ______________________________________________________ Phone: ________________ Fax: _________________ E-Mail: _____________________ 3) City of Saratoga grant funds requested in the past: ____________________________ 4) City of Saratoga grant funds received in the past: _____________________________ 5) Program description and number of unduplicated clients served: ________________ 6) Program purpose and objectives: ___________________________________________ 7) Program management: ___________________________________________________ 8) Agency description and experience: ________________________________________ 9) Audit information: _______________________________________________________ 10) Sources of funds anticipated for this project: _________________________________ 11) Budget: Please use the attached worksheet. 12) Performance Measurements: Please use the attached worksheet. 13) Outreach: ______________________________________________________________ 14) Leveraging: _____________________________________________________________ 15) Cost / Benefit Analysis: ___________________________________________________ 16) Target Beneficiaries: _____________________________________________________ BUDGET AGENCY NAME: ___________________________ Date Prepared: _________________ PROGRAM NAME: ____________________________________________________________ SPECIFIC ACTIVITIES BUDGET AMOUNT Can be broken down quarterly or annually (please specify) PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS AGENCY NAME: ___________________________ Date Prepared: ________________ PROGRAM NAME: ___________________________________________________________ PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT WORKSHEET GOAL: OBJECTIVE (1): OUTCOME (1): OBJECTIVE (2): OUTCOME (2): SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: March 3, 2010 DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER: Community DevelopmentDave Anderson PREPARED BY:DIRECTOR: Cynthia McCormick, AICPJohn F. Livingstone, AICP site coverage requirements and impervious surface definition SUBJECT:Review of RECOMMENDED ACTION: Direct staff regarding the preferred approach to revising site coverage requirements and impervious surface definition among one or more of the following optionswhich are discussed later in more detail: 1.Create an exception process that would allow the Planning Commission to approve variations from the site coverage standards upon making specific findings(similar to the process for grading standards). 2.Change the definition of “impervious surface” to exclude specified types of surfaces such as artificial turf, gravel, or driveways. As a variation on this option the Code could exclude specific types of surfaces in specific zoning districts,such as the current exclusionfor driveways in the Agricultural district. 3.Seek to address the goals of the site coverage requirements with a different approach such as a landscape ordinance. REPORT SUMMARY: In January 2010 the City Council held their annual retreat and discussed a work program for the Community Development Department. At that time, the Council discussed considering ordinance amendments affecting the City’s site coverage/impervious surfacerequirements.Council noted that therehave been considerable advances in technologyconcerning products that allow water to penetrate through them such as pavers and pervious concretes and that the city’s current definition may need updating to address the new materials. At the retreat the Council also separately discussed an updateto the City’s Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance as required by the recent state legislation being administered by the California Department of Water Resources(DWR). This update is scheduled for review by the Planning Commission on March 24th. Once recommended by the Planning Commission, the proposed ordinancewill be brought to the Council for consideration.One of the options discussed below relates to the Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance update. Page 1of 4 BACKGROUND: The General Plan sets site coverage limits for all residential and commercial/office areas inthe City. The Plan describes impervious coverage as being “any structure or constructed surface that disrupts the aesthetics of the landscape.” (General Plan Land Use Element, p.11.) The Zoning Code implements the General Plan with a more specific definition for “impervious surface”: “any structure or constructed surface that disrupts the natural aesthetic of the landscape, including, but not limited to, solid surface decks and patios, accessory structures, swimming pools, recreational courts, paved driveways and parking areas, and surfaces composed of gravel, decomposed granite, clay, and bricks with sand or concrete.” (Saratoga City Code section 15-06.370.) The Code then uses the term “impervious surface” in setting standards for determining site coverage. Site coverage is defined as: “the percentage of net site area covered by impervious surfaces including all structures, open or enclosed, or projections of structures.”(Saratoga City Code section15- 06.620(f).) These standards are implemented through the design review process, conditions of approval, and plan check prior to issuance of building permits. Since the General Plan’s impervious coverage limits were first adopted, state and federal regulations have been adopted that impose strict limits on local development to protect water quality and to promote water conservation. These include the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit requirements imposed by the federal Clean Water Act administered by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the more recent requirements by the State of California for an updated Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance.These rules set a minimum standard with which all local governments must comply. Cities and counties are permitted to adopt more restrictive standards that provide greaterprotection. While state and federal rules address water quality and conservation objectives of the site coverage policies, those rules do not address the aesthetics of the landscape. As a result, some projects, especially in the hillsides, have found that while it is possible to satisfy applicable water quality and other environmental protection goals, it is not possible to satisfy the City Code’s site coverage requirements with a home of the size and amenities often found in the area. This has led to requests to modify the site coverage requirements in the City Code(see attachment 1). DISCUSSION: Staff has identified three general approaches to addressingthe issues related to lot coverage. Council may direct staff and Planning Commission to pursue one of these approaches or a combination.Regardless of the option selected all projects in the City would continue to be required to comply with the minimum standards set by federal and state water quality and conservation rules. 1.Create an exception process that would allow the Planning Commission to approve variations from the site coverage standards upon making specific findings. Page 2of 4 The first approach would amend the City Code to establish an exception process. The process would allow the Planning Commission to approve variations from site coverage standards if the Commission could make specified findings. This approach is currently used with respect to grading standards. The City’s standard is that combined cut and fillgrading shall not exceed 1,000cubic yards but a larger amount may be approved by the Planning Commission upon making certainfindings.If Council elects to proceed with this approach staff would work with the Planning Commission to determine appropriate criteria to be used in evaluating requests for a variation form standards (e.g., effect on natural landscape, visibility, additional environmental protection benefit, etc.). 2.Change the definition of “impervious surface” to exclude specified types of surfaces such as artificial turf, gravel, or driveways. As a variation on this option the Code could exclude specific types of surfaces in specific zoning districts, as provided for driveways in theAgricultural district. This approach would consider revising the definition of impervious surface in the City Code. For example, the existing definition (quoted above) includes gravel and decomposed granite as being an impervious surface. The new State of California Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance, in contrast, considers these materials to be “mulch”. Furthermore, it has been suggestedthat gravel, sand, and/or decomposed granite should not be considered “impervious” because these materials allow some percolation of water into the ground. The State of California Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinancedefines“pervious”as any surface or material that allows the passage of water through the material and into the underlying soil. This suggests that the City could redefine impervious surface“asany surfaceor material that does notallow the passage of water through the material and into the underlying soil”.Although this is not required by the state law, a revision along these lines would reduce confusion on the part of applicants and would make it more likely that any project in compliance with the state law would also be in compliance with the City’s site coverage requirements. As a variation on this approach, the City could consider revising the site coverage requirements in some zoning districts to exclude specific types of surfaces such as artificial turf, gravel, clay, sand, decomposed granite, and/or driveways. Currently, the Agricultural District excludes access driveways and necessary turnaround areas from determining site coverage.This approach recognizesthat various surfaces may be more or less appropriate in different zoning districts depending on aesthetics, functionality, water usage, etc. 3.Seek to address the goals of the site coverage requirements with a different approach such as a landscape ordinance. This approach would involve replacing the current site coverage requirements with a landscaping ordinance focused on protecting natural aesthetics. The current definition for “impervious surfaces” appears to have been intendedto protect water quality and to also preserve the aesthetic quality of a property (by not allowing gravel to cover an entire front yard,for example). However, the current definitionmay encourage an applicantto install more plants and grass. This type of landscaping requires more water use which is counterintuitive to California’s Water Conservation in Landscaping Act whichrequires a reduction in water usage through the new Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Page 3of 4 The water allowance in theModel Water Efficient Landscape Ordinanceconsiders the total “landscaped area” as well as other factors such as a region’s typical rainfall. The ordinance defines“landscaped area”asincluding“all the planting areas,turf areas, and water features in a landscape design plan . . . . The landscape area does not includefootprints of buildings or structures, sidewalks, driveways, parking lots, decks, patios, gravel or stone walks, other pervious or non-pervious hardscapes, and other non-irrigated areas designated for non- development (e.g., open spaces and existing native vegetation).”(emphasis added.) A landscape ordinance would define what landscaping is and could regulate where and how much should be allowed. For example, the ordinance could require thata certain percentage of all front yardsbe landscaped.Site coverage by buildings and other structures would be regulated by existing standards in the Code for building size, setbacks, etc. FISCAL IMPACTS: Any amendments to the ordinance that may potentially increase the amount and type of impervious surface in the City will require environmental review in addition to public hearings with the Planning Commission and City Council. Any amendment that is more restrictive would typically have no environmental impact. Option one,creating an exception process,would not require environmental review upfront as any environmental effects would be considered on a case-by-case basis in relation to the proposed project. This option would cost approximately $5,000 in City Attorney time. Staff time would be addressed through the advance planning maintenance fund. The other options may require environmental review ranging from $20,000 to $30,000 and approximately $10,000 in CityAttorney time. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council could direct the Planning Commission to considerall three options, allowing an exception process, and creating a landscape ordinance that would also address the current definition of impervious surface. FOLLOW UP ACTION: Staff willconduct a study session with the Planning Commission based on City Council direction. ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT: Notice of this meeting was properly posted. ATTACHMENTS: 1.Correspondence from Ron Hills Page 4of 4 ìÛÕ×ÓÎÇÌÌ×ÊÐ×ÖÈÙÍÊÎ×Ê Attachment 1 Letter from Ronald and Suzanna Hills dated January 20, 2010 (pages 1-14) Notes from RonaldHills dated February 23, 2010(pages 15-18) Codes from other Cities (pages 19-20) Live Lawns (pages 21-22) Pavers (pages 23-27) ï î í ì ë ê é è ç ïî ïë ÝÑÓÓÛÒÌÍ ÑÒ ×ÓÐÛÎÊ×ÑËÍ ÝÑÊÛÎßÙÛ ÜÛÚ×Ò×Ì×ÑÒæ Ì¸» ½·¬§ ²»»¼ ¬± «°¼¿¬» ·¬ ½±¼» ¬± ½±®®»½¬ ¬¸» ¼»º·²·¬·±² ±º ×³°»®ª·±« Ý±ª»®¿¹» ¿²¼ ¿´´±© º±® ²»© ¬»½¸²±´±¹·» ¬± ¾» «»¼ º±® ´¿²¼½¿°·²¹ò Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ ª»®¾¿´ ·²¬»®°®»¬¿¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ½±¼» ½±«²¬ ß®¬·º·½·¿´ Ì«®ºô ¹®¿ª»´ ¿²¼ ¬®»» Þ¿®µ ¿ ×³°»®ª·±« Ý±ª»®¿¹» ¿²¼ ³¿µ» ²± »²» ¬± ¬¸» í ´¿©§»® ¿²¼ ¿ º±®³»® ¼·¬®·½¬ ¿¬¬±®²»§ × °±µ» ¬±ô ²±® ¬± ¿²§ ±º ¬¸» îð ½·¬·»ô ë ©¿¬»® ¼·¬®·½¬ô ¬¸» ÛÐßô ¿²¼ Ù®»»² Ñ®¹¿²·¦¿¬·±² × «®ª»§»¼ò × ¿´± ½¸»½µ»¼ ¬¸· ±«¬ ©·¬¸æ ÛÐßô Í¬¿¬» ½±¼»ô É»¾¬»®ùô Ù±±¹´»ô ¿²¼ É·µ·°»¼·¿ò Ì¸» ½±³³±² ¿²¼ ´»¹¿´ ·²¬»®°®»¬¿¬·±² ±º ·³°»®ª·±« ½»²¬»® ¿®±«²¼ ´·¯«·¼ °»®½±´¿¬·±²ô ²±¬ ¬¸¿¬ ·¬ · ¿ ½±²¬®«½¬»¼ «®º¿½» ¬¸¿¬ ¼·®«°¬ ¬¸» ²¿¬«®¿´ ¿»¬¸»¬·½ ±º ¬¸» ´¿²¼½¿°»ò Ûª»®§±²»ô »¨½»°¬ Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ô ¼»º·²» ·¬ ¿æ ¼±» ²±¬ ¿´´±© ®¿·² ©¿¬»® ¬± ¾» ¼·®»½¬´§ ¿¾±®¾»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» ¹®±«²¼ô ·²º·´¬®¿¬·±² ±º ©¿¬»® ·²¬± ¬¸» «²¼»®´§·²¹ ±·´ · °®»ª»²¬»¼ô ²±¬ ¿´´±©·²¹ ¿²§¬¸·²¹ ¬± °¿ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ·¬ô ·²½¿°¿¾´» ±º ¾»·²¹ °»²»¬®¿¬»¼ô »¿´ ±·´ «®º¿½»ô »´·³·²¿¬·²¹ «²¼»®¹®±«²¼ ²¿¬«®¿´ ©¿¬»® ®»½¸¿®¹»ô »¬½ò Ì± ³¿µ» ³¿¬¬»® ©±®»ô Ò¿¬«®¿´ ¿»¬¸»¬·½ ±º ¬¸» ´¿²¼½¿°» · ¿´± ²±¬ ¼»º·²»¼ ·² ¬¸» ½±¼» ¿²¼ ½¿² ¾» ª»®§ «¾¶»½¬·ª» øº®±³ ¼·®¬ñ©»»¼ ¬± ¹®¿ñ¬®»»÷ ¿²¼ ½±«´¼ ª¿®§ º®±³ °®±°»®¬§ ¬± °®±°»®¬§ò Ì¸» °®»»²¬ ½±¼» ·²¬»®°®»¬¿¬·±² ¿´´±© ¬¸» ½·¬§ ¬± »ºº»½¬·ª»´§ ·³°¿½¬ñ½±²¬®±´ ¬¸» ¿°°»¿®¿²½» ±º »²½´±»¼ ²±²óª··¾´» ®»¿® §¿®¼ ´¿²¼½¿°·²¹ô »ª»² ¬¸±«¹¸ ¬¸· ¼»·®» ¬± ½±²¬®±´ · ²±¬ ³»²¬·±²»¼ ¿²§©¸»®» ·² ¬¸» ½±¼»ò Ì¸» °®»»²¬ ·²¬»®°®»¬¿¬·±² ¸¿ ¿²±¬¸»® ²»¹¿¬·ª» ·³°¿½¬ ±² ¸±³»±©²»® ¾»½¿«» ³¿²§ «» ¬®»» ¾¿®µ ±® ¹®¿ª»´ ·² °´¿²¬»® ¿®»¿ ¬± ®»¬¿·² ©¿¬»® ·² «³³»®ô ±® ß®¬·º·½·¿´ Ì«®º ·² °´¿½» ±º ´·ª» ´¿©² ©¸»®» ®»¿´ ¹®¿ ¼±»²¬ ¹®±© ©»´´ ø«½¸ ¿ ¸¿¼»¼ ¿®»¿ ±® ¸·¹¸ ¬®¿ºº·½ ¿®»¿÷ ±® ¶«¬ ¬± ¿ª» ©¿¬»®ò × ¿«³» ¬¸¿¬ °»±°´» ©¸± ¸¿ª» ¿°°´·»¼ô ±® ©·´´ ¿°°´§ô º±® ¿ ¾«·´¼·²¹ °»®³·¬ ¸¿ª» ¾»»²ô ±® ©·´´ ¾»ô ®»¯«·®»¼ ¬± ½±«²¬ ¬¸»» ³¿¬»®·¿´ ¿¹¿·²¬ ¬¸»·® ×³°»®ª·±« Ý±ª»®¿¹» ´·³·¬ ²± ³¿¬¬»® ©¸»®» ·¬ · ±² ¬¸»·® °®±°»®¬§ò Ì¸· ¼±» ²±¬ ¿´´±© ¸±³»±©²»® ¬± º®»»´§ »´»½¬ ¬¸»·® ±©² ´¿²¼½¿°·²¹ ±® »²½±«®¿¹» ¸±³»±©²»® ¬± «» ³±¼»®² °®±¼«½¬ ¬¸¿¬ ¿ª» ©¿¬»® ©¸·´» ¹·ª·²¹ ¿ ¿»¬¸»¬·½¿´´§ °´»¿·²¹ ´¿²¼½¿°»¼ ¿°°»¿®¿²½»ò ï îñîíñïð ×³°»®ª·±« Ý±ª»®¿¹» ×«» ïê Ì¸»®» ¿®» ³±¼»®² °®±¼«½¬ ¬¸¿¬ ¸»´° ¿ª» ©¿¬»® ©¸·´» °®±ª·¼·²¹ ¿»¬¸»¬·½¿´´§ °´»¿·²¹ ´¿²¼½¿°·²¹ò Û¨¿³°´» ¿®»æ ß®¬·º·½·¿´ Ì«®º øßÌ÷ô ¬®»» ¾¿®µô ¹®¿ª»´ô ¼»½µ ´·µ» «®º¿½» ¬¸¿¬ ´»¬ ©¿¬»® °»®½±´¿¬» ·²¬± ¬¸» ¹®±«²¼ô ¿²¼ ³¿²«º¿½¬«®»¼ ³¿¬»®·¿´ «½¸ ¿ °±®±« ½»³»²¬ ¿²¼ Ø§¼®±óÚ´± ¬»½¸²±´±¹§ °¿ª»® ø»» ¿¬¬¿½¸³»²¬óß÷ ¬¸¿¬ ¿´´±© ©¿¬»® ¬± °»®½±´¿¬» ¬¸®±«¹¸ ¬¸»³ò ÏËÛÍÌ×ÑÒÍ ÌØÛ Ý×ÌÇ ÒÛÛÜÍ ÌÑ ÜÛÝ×ÜÛæ ïó Ü±» Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ ©¿²¬ ¬± ¾» ¬¸» ±²´§ ½·¬§ ·²¬»®°®»¬·²¹ þ×³°»®ª·±« Ý±ª»®¿¹»þ ¿ ¿ þ¿»¬¸»¬·½þ ¯«»¬·±² ø¼»º·²»¼ ¿ ²±¬ ®»°®»»²¬·²¹ ¿ ²¿¬«®¿´ ´¿²¼½¿°» ´±±µ÷ ±® ¿ ¿ °»®½±´¿¬·±² ¯«»¬·±²á ×¬ «²º¿·® ø× ¿´± ¬¸·²µ ·´´»¹¿´÷ ¬± «¾¶»½¬·ª»´§ ¼»º·²» ¿ ×³°»®ª·±« Ý±ª»®¿¹» ½±¼» ©·¬¸ ²± ¼»º·²·¬·±² ±º ©¸¿¬ ¿½½»°¬¿¾´» ²¿¬«®¿´ ´¿²¼½¿°·²¹ò Ø±© ¼±» ¬¸» ½·¬§ ¶«¬·º§ ·¬ ·²¬»®°®»¬¿¬·±² ±º ×³°»®ª·±« Ý±ª»®¿¹» ¬¸¿¬ ¼±» ²±¬ ½±²º±®³ ¬± ¿²§±²» »´» ´»¹¿´ ¼»º·²·¬·±²á ×¬ · ¿´± ª»®§ «¾¶»½¬·ª» ¬± ¿§ ß®¬·º·½·¿´ Ì«®º ¼±»²¬ ´±±µ ´·µ» ¹®¿ÿ Ì¸» Ì«®º ´±±µ ¿²¼ º»»´ · ©¸¿¬ ³¿µ» ·¬ ¿ ¾±±³·²¹ ¾«·²»ò îó Ü±» ¬¸» ½·¬§ ©¿²¬ ¬± ½±²¬·²«» °»²¿´·¦·²¹ ¸±³»±©²»® ©¸± «» ¬¸»» °®±¼«½¬ ¬± ¿ª» ©¿¬»® ©¸·´» ·³°®±ª·²¹ ¬¸» ¿»¬¸»¬·½ ±º ¬¸»·® °®±°»®¬§ ¿²¼ ¬¸» ½·¬§á íó Ü±» ¬¸» ½·¬§ ©¿²¬ ¬± ¼»º·²»ñ½±²¬®±´ »²½´±»¼ ®»¿® §¿®¼ ´¿²¼½¿°·²¹á ×º ±ô ©¸§á Ø±© ©±«´¼ ¬¸» ½·¬§ ¿½½±³°´·¸ ¬¸· ±® ³±²·¬±® ¬¸·ô ¿²¼ ©¸»®» ¼± ©» ¹»¬ ¬¸» »¨¬®¿ ³±²»§ ¬± ¼± ½±¼» »²º±®½»³»²¬á Ü±» ¬¸» ½·¬§ ©¿²¬ ¬± ¾» µ²±© ¿ ¿ ¾·¹ ¹±ª»®²³»²¬ ø¾·¹ ¾®±¬¸»®÷ ¬§°» ±º ½·¬§á Ì¸· ©·´´ ¼·½±«®¿¹» °»±°´» º®±³ ³±ª·²¹ ¬± Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ ¿²¼ ½±²»¯«»²¬´§ ´±©»® °®±°»®¬§ ª¿´«» ¿²¼ ¬¿¨» ø·²½±³» ¬± ¬¸» ½·¬§÷ò Ò»·¹¸¾±®·²¹ ½·¬·» ¼±²¬ ¼± ¬¸·ò ìó Ø±© ¼±» ¬¸» ½·¬§ °´¿² ¬± «°°±®¬ ¿²¼ »²½±«®¿¹» ¸±³»±©²»® ¬± ½±²»®ª» ´¿²¼½¿°·²¹ ©¿¬»®á É·´´ ¬¸» ½·¬§ ½±²¬·²«» ¬± °»²¿´·¦·²¹ ¸±³»±©²»® º±® «·²¹ ©¿¬»® ¿ª·²¹ ´¿²¼½¿°·²¹ ³¿¬»®·¿´á É¸§ ¿®» ©» ©±®®§·²¹ ¿¾±«¬ ¸±©»® º´±© ®»¬®·½¬±® ©¸»² ´·ª» ´¿©² ¿®» ¬¸» ¾·¹¹»¬ ©¿¬»® «»® øâëðû÷á ëó Ø±© ¼±» ¬¸» ½·¬§ ú ¬¸» ¸±³»±©²»® ½±³°´§ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» É¿¬»® Ü·¬®·½¬ ®»¬®·½¬·±² ¿²¼ º·²» ±² ©¿¬»® «¿¹»ô ¿ ©»´´ ¿ ¬¸» ²»© Ý¿´ò Í¬¿¬» Ô¿²¼½¿°·²¹ ´¿©á É¿¬»® ¼·¬®·½¬ ¿®» î îñîíñïð ×³°»®ª·±« Ý±ª»®¿¹» ×«» ïé ©·´´·²¹ ¬± °¿§ Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ ¸±³»±©²»® ¬± ®»°´¿½» ®»¿´ ¬«®º ©·¬¸ ß®¬·º·½·¿´ Ì«®ºò Þ«¬ ½·¬§ °»²¿´·¦» « ·º ©» ¼± ©¸¿¬ ¬¸» É¿¬»® Ü·¬®·½¬ · ¬®§·²¹ ¬± °®±³±¬»ò Ì¸» ½±¬ ±º ©¿¬»® · °®±¶»½¬»¼ ¬± ·²½®»¿» íêû ±ª»® ¬¸» ²»¨¬ í §»¿®á É¿¬»® Ü·¬®·½¬ ¿®» ¾»·²¹ ¬¸®»¿¬»²»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» Í¬¿¬» ¬¸¿¬ ·º ¬¸»§ ¼±²¬ ®»¼«½» ©¿¬»® ½±²«³°¬·±² ¾§ îðû ¬¸»§ ½±«´¼ ´±±» Í¬¿¬» ¿·¼ò Ø±³»±©²»® ©·´´ ¬±° °´¿²¬·²¹ ´·ª» ¹®»»² ´¿©² ±® ¬¿®¬ ¬«®²·²¹ ±ºº ¬¸»·® ´¿²¼½¿°» ·®®·¹¿¬·±² ¶«¬ ¬± ½±³°´§ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» É¿¬»® ®»¬®·½¬·±² ¿²¼ ¿ª» ³±²»§ò Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ ©·´´ ¸¿ª» ³±®» ¸±³» ©·¬¸ ¼·®¬ ú ©»»¼ ·² ¬¸»·® º®±²¬ §¿®¼ò Ì¸» Ð´¿²²·²¹ Ü»°¬ò ¸¿ ¿ ½±²½»®² ¿¾±«¬ ßÌ ¾»½±³·²¹ ½´±¹¹»¼ ±ª»® ¬·³» ø¬± ïëû °»®½±´¿¬·±² ®¿¬»÷ ¿²¼ ½¿«·²¹ ©¿¬»® ®«²±ººò Ì¸» ´»¿¬ °»®½±´¿¬·²¹ Ì«®º × º±«²¼ ½¿² ½´±¹ ¼±©² ¬± äïû °»®½±´¿¬·±² ®¿¬» ¿²¼ ¬·´´ ¸¿²¼´» âççû ±º Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ ©±®» ½¿» ®¿·² ¬±®³ ±ª»® ¬¸» ´¿¬ é §»¿®ò Î»¿´ ´¿©² ¿²¼ ¼·®¬ ½¿«» ®«²±ºº °®±¾´»³ º¿¬»® ¬¸¿² ßÌ ©·¬¸ ·¬ ¾¿» ®±½µ ¬¸¿¬ ¿½¬ ´·µ» ¿ ¼»¬»²¬·±² °±²¼ò Ò± ±¬¸»® ½·¬§ ±® ©¿¬»® ³¿²¿¹»³»²¬ ¹®±«° ©±®®·» ¿¾±«¬ ·¬ò Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ Ø·¹¸ô Ð®±°»½¬ Ø·¹¸ ¿²¼ ³¿²§ ±¬¸»® ½¸±±´ ¸¿ª» ª»®§ ´¿®¹» º´¿¬ º±±¬¾¿´´ º·»´¼ ±º ßÌò ÍËÙÙÛÍÌ×ÑÒÍ ÚÑÎ ËÐÜßÌ×ÒÙ ÝÑÜÛæ Î»ó©®·¬» ¿®¬·½´» ïëóðêòíéð ¿²¼ Î»¯ º±® ¼»·¹² ®»ª·»© ¿°°´·½¿¬·±²ô °¹óîô ·¬»³ó³ ¬±æ ßóÜ»º·²» ×³°»®ª·±« Ý±ª»®¿¹» ¿ ¿ ©¿¬»® °»®½±´¿¬·±² ·«»ò Ü»º·²» Ô¿²¼½¿°» ß»¬¸»¬·½ ¿ ¿ »°¿®¿¬» ·«»ò Þó Ú±® ×ÓÐÛÎÊ×ÑËÍ ÝÑÊÛÎßÙÛ ·«»æ ¼± ÒÑÌ ½±«²¬ ¿²§ ³¿¬»®·¿´ ¬¸¿¬ ½¿² °»®½±´¿¬» ©¿¬»® ï °»® ¼¿§öô «½¸ ¿æ ß®¬·º·½·¿´ ¬«®ºô Ì®»» Þ¿®µô ¹®¿ª»´ô ¼»½µ «®º¿½» ¬¸¿¬ ´»¬ ©¿¬»® °»®½±´¿¬» ·²¬± ¬¸» ¹®±«²¼ô ¿²¼ ³¿²«º¿½¬«®»¼ ³¿¬»®·¿´ «½¸ ¿ °±®±« ½»³»²¬ ¿²¼ Ø§¼®±óÚ´± ¬»½¸²±´±¹§ °¿ª»® ¬¸¿¬ ¿´´±© ©¿¬»® ¬± °»®½±´¿¬» ¬¸®±«¹¸ ¬¸»³ò ß´´±© ½±²·¼»®¿¬·±² º±® «²¼»®¹®±«²¼ °»®½±´¿¬·±² ¬¿²µñ§¬»³ ¬¸¿¬ ¿½½«³«´¿¬» ©¿¬»® ®«²±ºº º®±³ ¸¿®¼ «®º¿½» ¿²¼ ´±©´§ ¿´´±© ¬¸» ©¿¬»® ¬± °»®½±´¿¬» ·²¬± ¬¸» ¹®±«²¼ ø¿ ·² Ý«°»®¬·²± ½±¼»÷ò Ì¸»®» · ²± ²»»¼ ¬± ©±®®§ ¿¾±«¬ »¬¾¿½µ º®±³ °®±°»®¬§ ´·²» º±® ¬¸»» °®±¼«½¬ ·²½» ¬¸»§ ½±²¬®±´ ®«²±ºº ¾»¬¬»® ¬¸¿² ¼·®¬ ±® ¹®¿ò Ýó Ú±® ÔßÒÜÍÝßÐÛ ßÛÍÌØÛÌ×ÝÍ æ ¼·ª·¼» ª··¾´» ªò ²±²ó ª··¾´» §¿®¼ ¿®»¿ ¾§ ©¸¿¬ ½¿² ¾» »»² º®±³ ¬¸» ¬®»»¬ò ×º ·¬ ½¿² ¾» »»² ¾§ ¬¸» °«¾´·½ ¿¬ ¿ ¼·¬¿²½» ø«½¸ ¿ ¿ í îñîíñïð ×³°»®ª·±« Ý±ª»®¿¹» ×«» ïè »½±²¼ ¬±®§ ²»·¹¸¾±® ©·²¼±© ±® º®±³ ¿ ¸·´´ ·¼»÷ ·¬ ¸±«´¼ ÒÑÌ ¾» ½±«²¬»¼ ¿ ª··¾´»ò Ú±® ª··¾´» ¿®»¿ ¸¿ª» ¸±³»±©²»® ¸±© ¿³°´» ±º ¬¸» °®±°±»¼ Ì«®ºñ¹®¿ª»´ñ¾¿®µñ°¿ª»®ñ»¬½ ø°´« ¬¸» °®±°±»¼ ´±½¿¬·±² º±® »¿½¸÷ ¬± Ð´¿²²·²¹ º±® ¿°°®±ª¿´ô ·³·´¿® ¬± ©¸¿¬ °®»»²¬´§ ®»¯«·®»¼ º±® ½±´±®ô ®±±º ³¿¬»®·¿´ô »¬½ò Ü± ²±¬ ¿´´±© ±´¼ ß¬®± Ì«®º ±® ×²¼±±®ñÑ«¬¼±±® ½¿®°»¬·²¹ ·² ª··¾´» ¿®»¿ò Î»¯«·®» ¬¸¿¬ ´¿²¼½¿°·²¹ô »¬½ ¿²¼ ³±®» ¼»º·²»¼ ¿ ¬± ©¸¿¬ ¿´´±©»¼ñ¼·¿´´±©»¼ó ¬¸»®» ¿®» ²«³»®±« ±°¬·±²÷ò Ú±® ²±²óª··¾´» ¿®»¿ ¼±²¬ ½±²¬®±´ ¬¸» ´¿²¼½¿°·²¹ ¼»·¹² ±® ³¿¬»®·¿´ »¨½»°¬ º±® ©¿¬»® ®«²±ºº ¬± ²»·¹¸¾±® ±® ·² ¸·´´·¼» ´±°» ±ª»® ¢ÈÈû ´±°»ò Î»³»³¾»® ¬¸»» °®±¼«½¬ ¿½¬«¿´´§ ®»¼«½» ©¿¬»® ®«²±ºº ¿²¼ ¬¸» °±¬»²¬·¿´ º±® ³«¼´·¼» ¾§ ¿´´±©·²¹ ³±®» ¬·³» º±® ¬¸» ¼·®¬ ¬± ¿¾±®¾ ®¿·²©¿¬»®ò ö Þ¿»¼ ±² Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ ®¿·²º¿´´ ±ª»® ´¿¬ é §»¿®ò ß´´ ß®¬·º·½·¿´ ¬«®º ½¿² ¸¿²¼´» âïêèñ¼¿§ øéñ¸®÷ò Ø§¼®±óÚ´± Ð¿ª»® ½¿² ¸¿²¼´» îìñ¼¿§ øïñ¸®÷ò ×² ¬¸» ©±®» ½¿» øîìñ¼¿§÷ô ·º ¬¸»» °®±¼«½¬ ¿½½«³«´¿¬» ¼«¬ñ¼·®¬ ±ª»® ¬¸» §»¿®ô ¬¸»§ ½¿² ¾»½±³» ¢çêû ½´±¹¹»¼ ¿²¼ ¬·´´ ¸¿²¼´» ¢ççû ±º Í¿®¿¬±¹¿ ©±®» ½¿» ®¿·² ¬±®³ô ©¸·½¸ · ¬·´´ ³«½¸ ¾»¬¬»® ¬¸¿² ¼·®¬ ±® ¹®¿ ½¿² ¸¿²¼´»ò ÍËÓÓßÎÇæ Ð®»»²¬ ¬± Ý·¬§ Ý±«²½·´æ ó ×³°»®ª·±« Ý±ª»®¿¹» ½±¼» · ³·ó´»¿¼·²¹ ¿²¼ ±«¬ ±º ¼¿¬»ò ó Î»½±³³»²¼ ½¸¿²¹» ·² ½±¼» ¬± ½´»¿®´§ ¼»º·²»æ ïó ×³°»®ª·±« Ý±ª»®¿¹» ¿ ¿ ©¿¬»® °»®½±´¿¬·±² ·«»ò îó Í»°¿®¿¬» ½±¼» º±® Ô¿²¼½¿°·²¹ ß»¬¸»¬·½ ó ß´´±© º±® ²»© ¬»½¸²±´±¹§ ¬± ¾» «»¼ ¬± ¸»´° ±´ª» Í¬¿¬» Ô¿²¼½¿°·²¹ Ô¿© ®»¯«·®»³»²¬ ¿²¼ ³»»¬ ²»»¼ ±º ´±½¿´ É¿¬»® Ü·¬®·½¬ò ó Î»½±³³»²¼ Ý·¬§ ¬·´´ ¸¿ ±ª»®·¹¸¬ ·²¬± ´¿²¼½¿°·²¹ ¿°°»¿®¿²½» º±® ª··¾´» ´¿©² ¿®»¿ò Ï«»¬·±² ¬± Ý·¬§ Ý±«²½·´æ ó Ü±» ¬¸» ½·¬§ ©¿²¬ ¬± ½±²¬®±´ ¬¸» ¿°°»¿®¿²½» ±® «» ±º ¿²§ ³¿¬»®·¿´ «»¼ ·² ²±²óª··¾´» ´¿©² ¿®»¿ô «½¸ ¿ »²½´±»¼ ®»¿® §¿®¼ô ±¬¸»® ¬¸¿² º±® ©¿¬»® °»®½±´¿¬·±² ²»»¼á ì îñîíñïð ×³°»®ª·±« Ý±ª»®¿¹» ×«» ïç PA Code 18.04.030 Definitions (74)"Impervious area" means the portion of land on a lot that is covered by structures, paved surfaces, uncovered porches or similar cover and is incapable of being penetrated by water under normal circumstances. Artificial Turf – not covered Gravel, tree bark – not counted as Impervious Coverage LA Code Title 11 Los Altos, MISCELLANEOUS California - PROPERTY Code of REGULATIONSOrdinances ...or part thereof. "Animated sign" means any sign that uses movement or change of lighting, either natural or artificial, to depict action or create a special effect or scene. "Arcade" means aprivate or public passageway either...and poison ivy when the conditions of growth are such as to constitute a menace to the public health; 5. Dry grass, stubble, brush litter or other flammable material which endangers the public safety by creating a firehazard. ... Cupertino Code Glossary of terms îð Code 18.04.030, Definitions: section(74) "Impervious area" means the portion of land on a lot that is covered by structures, paved surfaces, uncovered porches or similar cover and is incapable of being penetrated by water under normal circumstances Code 18.12.060, Parking (b) Parking and Driveway Surface Parking and driveway surfaces may have either permeable or impermeable paving. Materials shall be those acceptable to public works department standards. Gravel and similar loose materials shall not be used for driveway or parking surfaces within 10 feet of the public right of way. îï Interesting article in Geophysical Research Letters about live lawns Townsend-Small, A., and C. I. Czimczik Þ§ Carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions in urban turf Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L02707, doi:10.1029/2009GL041675 22 January 2010 journal ©©©ò¿¹«ò±®¹ññ¹´ñ Þ¿·½¿´´§ó ¿²§ Ý¿®¾±² º±±¬ °®·²¬ ¿¼ª¿²¬¿¹» ±º ¸¿ª·²¹ ¿ ´·ª» ´¿©² ª ²± ´¿©² ±® ß®¬·º·½·¿´ Ì«®º · ´±¬ ¼«» ¬± ÝÑî ¹¿» º®±³ »¯«·°³»²¬ ³¿·²¬¿·²·²¹ ¬¸» ´¿©²ò É» ¬·´´ ²»»¼ °¿®µ ¾«¬ ©¸§ ²±¬ »²½±«®¿¹» «» ±º ß®¬·º·½·¿´ Ì«®º º±® ¸±³» ±©²»®ÿÿ ---------------------------- City Parks May Be Bad for the Environment ×²·¼» Í½·»²½» Ù®»»² °¿®µ ·² ¼®§ ½´·³¿¬» ³¿§ ¿½¬«¿´´§ ·²½®»¿» ¬¸» ¿³±«²¬ ±º ÝÑî ®»´»¿»¼ ·²¬± ¬¸» ¿¬³±°¸»®»ô ¿½½±®¼·²¹ ¬± ²»© ®»»¿®½¸ò ÉßÍØ×ÒÙÌÑÒ óó Ð´¿²¬ ¿®» ««¿´´§ ±«® ¿´´·» ©¸»² ·¬ ½±³» ¬± ®»¼«½·²¹ ¬¸» ¿¬³±°¸»®»ù ¹®»»²¸±«» ¹¿»ô ½±²ª»®¬·²¹ ½¿®¾±² ¼·±¨·¼» ·²¬± º±±¼ ¿²¼ ¬±®·²¹ ¬¸» ¹¿ù ½¿®¾±² ·² ¬¸» ±·´ ¾»´±©ò Þ«¬ ¿½½±®¼·²¹ ¬± ²»© ®»»¿®½¸ô ¹®»»² °¿®µ ·² ¼®§ ½´·³¿¬» óó ©¸·½¸ ¾®·²¹ ¬¸·½µ ½¿®¾±²ó½¿°¬«®·²¹ ¹®¿ ¬± ®»¹·±² ²±®³¿´´§ °±°«´¿¬»¼ ¾§ °¿®» ²¿¬·ª» ª»¹»¬¿¬·±² óó ³¿§ ¿½¬«¿´´§ ·²½®»¿» ¬¸» ¿³±«²¬ ±º ÝÑî ®»´»¿»¼ ·²¬± ¬¸» ¿¬³±°¸»®»ò þÌ¸» ¹®»»²¸±«» ¹¿» °®±¼«½»¼ ¾§ ³¿·²¬¿·²·²¹ ¬¸» °¿®µ ¿®» ¬¸» °®±¾´»³ôþ ®»°±®¬ ß³§ Ì±©²»²¼óÍ³¿´´ô ¿² »¿®¬¸ ½·»²¬·¬ ¿¬ ¬¸» Ë²·ª»®·¬§ ±º Ý¿´·º±®²·¿ô ×®ª·²»ò Ø»® ®»»¿®½¸ «¹¹»¬ ¬¸¿¬ °¿®µ ·² ¿®·¼ ½·¬·»ô ¿ ¬¸»§ ¿®» ½«®®»²¬´§ ³¿²¿¹»¼ ¿²¼ ´¿²¼½¿°»¼ô ¿®» ²±¬ ¿ îî þ¹®»»²þ ¿ ¬¸»§ ´±±µò Ø»® ³»¿«®»³»²¬ ±º ±·´ ½¿®¾±² ¿²¼ ¬¸» ¿·® ¿¾±ª» ¬¸» °¿®µù ¬«®º ·² ×®ª·²» ¸±©»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¹®¿ ·¬»´º ½¿°¬«®» ¿ º¿·® ¿³±«²¬ ±º ÝÑî ¿²¼ »³·¬ ±²´§ ¿ ¬·²§ ¿³±«²¬ ±º ²·¬®±« ±¨·¼»ô ¿ ¹®»»²¸±«» ¹¿ ¬¸¿¬ ±·´ ¾¿½¬»®·¿ ½®»¿¬» ©¸·´» ¼·¹»¬·²¹ º»®¬·´·¦»®ò Þ«¬ ©¸»² Ì±©²»²¼óÍ³¿´´ ·²½´«¼»¼ »¬·³¿¬» ¿¾±«¬ ¸±© ³«½¸ »²»®¹§ ¿²¼ º«»´ ©¿ ®»¯«·®»¼ ¬± ³¿²¿¹» ¬¸» ´¿²¼ óó ¿²¼ ¬¸» °±´´«¬·±² °®±¼«½»¼ ¾§ »¯«·°³»²¬ «½¸ ¿ ´¿©² ³±©»® ¿²¼ ´»¿º ¾´±©»® óó ¸» ½¿´½«´¿¬»¼ ¬¸» ®»«´¬·²¹ ½¿®¾±² º±±¬°®·²¬ ½®»¿¬»¼ º®±³ ´¿²¼½¿°·²¹ ³¿·²¬»²¿²½» ¬± ¾» ïð ¬·³» ¬¸» ¿³±«²¬ ±º ½¿®¾±² ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» °¿®µù ¹®»»² ¿®»¿ ½±«´¼ ¿¾±®¾ò Ö«¬ ©¿¬»®·²¹ ¬¸» ¹®¿ ¿´±²» °®±¼«½»¼ »²±«¹¸ ½¿®¾±² ¬± ±ª»®®·¼» ¿²§ °±¬»²¬·¿´ ®»¼«½¬·±² ·² ¬¸» ¹¿ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ´¿©² ³·¹¸¬ °®±¼«½»ò Ì¸» ²«³¾»® ©»®» »ª»² ©±®» º±® ¬¸» °¿®µù ¿¬¸´»¬·½ º·»´¼ô ©¸»®» ¬«®º · ½±²¬·²«¿´´§ ¬±®² «° ¿²¼ ®»°´¿²¬»¼ ¾»º±®» ·¬ ½¿² ¬±®» ·¹²·º·½¿²¬ ¿³±«²¬ ±º ½¿®¾±²ò Ð«¾´·¸»¼ ·² ¬¸» Ö¿²ò îî ·«» ±º ¬¸» ¶±«®²¿´ Geophysical Research ¬¸» ®»»¿®½¸ «¹¹»¬ ¬¸¿¬ °¿®µ ·² ¿®·¼ ½·¬·»ô ¿ ½«®®»²¬´§ Letters, ½®»¼·¬ò ³¿²¿¹»¼ô ¸±«´¼ ²±¬ ½±«²¬ ¿ ½¿®¾±² îí îì îë îê îé