HomeMy WebLinkAbout102-Attachment 1 - City Council Reso.pdfRESOLUTION NO. ____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SARATOGA DENYING AN APPEAL; THEREBY AFFIRMING THE
PLANNING COMMISSION’S APPROVAL OF
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION PDR08-0034
Jean; 14966 Sobey Road
Approval of a new two-story, single family residence with attached garage and
basement
WHEREAS, on January 28, 2009, following a duly noticed public hearing at
which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and present
evidence, the City of Saratoga Planning Commission approved a Design Review
application (PDR08-0034) for the construction of a new 5,754 square foot residence on a
48,337 square foot parcel; and
WHEREAS, on February 11, 2009 an appeal of the Planning Commission
decision was filed by the appellants Rick and Colleen Pouliot, Subhash and Uma
Chowdary, and Diana and Richard Anderson; and
WHEREAS, on April 1, 2009, the City Council held a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the appeal at which time all interested parties were given a full
opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Saratoga has considered the appeal
and all testimony and other evidence submitted in connection therewith;
Now, therefore be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Saratoga hereby:
I. Deny the appeal and affirm the Planning Commission’s approval of the Design
Review application; and
II. Determines that the proposed project including a new two-story, single-family
residence is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303(c) New Construction or Conversion of Small
Structures. This exemption allows for construction of a single-family home in an urban
area.
III. Determines that the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said
application for Design Review Approval, as consistent with the below General Plan
policies and the following findings specified in City Code Section Article 15-45.080 and
the City’s Residential Design Handbook:
General Plan Findings
The proposed project is consistent with all of the following General Plan Policies:
Land Use Element Goal 13 – The City shall use the design review process to assure
that new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the
adjacent surroundings. The proposed project incorporates earth tones and materials,
such as authentic slate and natural stone, that blend in well with the existing
surroundings. The project will also follow the natural hillside slope in order to minimize
the prominence of the structure while increase the compatibility with the natural terrain.
Land Use Element 1.1. – The City shall use the design review process to assure that the
new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the
adjacent surroundings. The proposed project has utilized policies and techniques from
the Saratoga Residential Design Handbook such as designing the structure to follow the
natural slope contours of site to minimize its perception of bulk, maximize energy
efficiency by fitting certain portions of the residence into the grade to reduce wind
exposure, and the use of landscaping to screen living areas most sensitive to privacy.
Design Review Findings
The proposed project is consistent with all of the following Design Review findings
stated in City Code Section 15-45.080:
(a) Avoid unreasonable interference with views and privacy. The project has been
designed in a manner that minimizes interference with neighboring views and privacy to
adjacent properties by doing the following:
a. Locating the second-story structure out of the direct line-of-sight of
neighboring properties.
b. Removal of second-story windows facing the north and south properties,
in order to protect neighboring privacy.
c. Situating the proposed home on a lower portion of the lot in order to
follow the contours of the site slope while protect the views, to the extent
feasible, of elevated properties located to the east.
d. The new construction is located toward the rear of the lot, providing an
increased front setback greater than the minimum required by the
Municipal Code.
e. To the east of the proposed building, the site slopes upward to dense
landscaping. The parcel to the north and south are well screened with
existing mature landscaping.
f. Extensive tree planting using existing and new landscape is proposed to
the south property line, adjacent to the access easement, in order to create
a visual screen between properties to the south.
(b) Preserve Natural Landscape. Seven protected trees will be removed. The
building has been located in an effort to minimize its impacts on all other existing
trees. The 30 existing trees potentially impacted by the project will be protected
during the construction process and incorporated into the formal landscaping plan.
Additionally, 39 new trees will be added to the site. The area to the west of the
residence will have a vineyard.
(c) Preserve Native and Heritage Trees. One four inch oak is proposed for removal,
as it is in conflict with the design. No Heritage trees are onsite. As conditioned,
39 new trees will be added to the site. Five of those trees will be of the Native
species.
(d) Minimize perception of excessive bulk. The project incorporates an earth tone
color pallet and high-quality materials into its design. These materials include
horizontal wood siding, natural stone veneer, and an authentic slate roof. These
colors and materials will reduce the perception of excessive bulk in the rural
environment. The size of the second story is located to the center of the building
footprint so that the majority of house footprint is a single story. The project has
been designed to follow the natural contour of the existing slope, thereby
minimizing the prominence of the structure and increase the compatibility with
the natural terrain.
(e) Compatible bulk and height. The proposed home with a height of 26 feet is
compatible in terms of bulk and height with the existing residential structures on
nearby lots. The varying rooflines, architectural detailing, and combination of
high-quality exterior materials will minimize the perception of bulk. The height
of the project is consistent with adjacent properties and will be alleviated by the
large setbacks and landscape screening.
(f) Current grading and erosion control methods. The applicant has submitted a
grading and drainage plan, which incorporates current grading and erosion control
methods. The geotechnical report and recommendations are included as a
condition of approval. Furthermore, the project is conditioned to require retention
of stormwater on site, to the maximum extent reasonably feasible.
(g) Design policies and techniques. The proposed project conforms to all of the
applicable design policies and techniques in the Residential Design Handbook in
that the design will follow the natural slope contours of site, utilize materials that
blend with the natural environment, use landscaping to screen living areas most
sensitive to privacy, protect neighbor’s privacy by proper site planning and
appropriate landscape, and fit certain portions of the residence into the grade to
reduce wind exposure and provide wind protection.
IV. After careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings, and other exhibits
submitted in connection with this matter, the exemption from CEQA is approved and
required findings being made that the application number of PDR08-0034 for a Planning
Commission Design Review Approval is hereby granted subject to the following conditions:
UCONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
A. GENERAL
1. All conditions below which are identified as permanent or for which an
alternative period of time for applicability is specified shall run with the land
and apply to the landowner’s successors in interest for such time period. No
demolition, grading, or building permit for this project shall take effect until
proof is filed with the City that a certificate of approval documenting all
applicable permanent or other term-specified conditions has been recorded
by the applicant with the Santa Clara County Recorder’s office in form and
content acceptable to the Community Development Director.
2. If a condition is not “Permanent” or does not have a term specified, it shall
remain in effect until the issuance by the City of Saratoga or a Certificate of
Occupancy or its equivalent.
3. Conditions may be modified only by the Planning Commission unless
modification is expressly otherwise allowed by the City Code including but
not limited to Section 15-80.120 and/or 16.05.035, as applicable.
4. A Building permit must be issued and construction commenced within 36
months from the date of adoption of this Resolution or the Design Review
Approval will expire unless extended in accordance with the City Code
5. The Project shall maintain compliance with all applicable regulations of the
State, County, City and/or other governmental agencies having jurisdiction
including, without limitation, the requirements of the Saratoga Zoning
Regulations.
6. Prior to issuance of any demolition, grading, or building permit to implement
this Design Review Approval, the applicant shall obtain a “Zoning
Clearance” from the Community Development Director by submitting final
plans for the requested permit to the Community Development Department
for review to ascertain compliance with the requirements of this Resolution.
USTANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
1. Agreement to Indemnify, Hold Harmless and Defend City. Owner and
Applicant shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its employees, agents,
independent contractors and volunteers (collectively “City”) from any and all costs
and expenses, including, but not limited to attorney’s fees incurred by the City or
held to be the liability of City in connection with City’s defense in any proceeding
brought in any State or Federal Court, challenging the City’s action with respect to
the applicant’s project or contesting any action or inaction in the City’s processing
and/or approval of the subject application.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2. Compliance with Plans. The development shall be located and constructed to
include those features, and only those features, as shown on the Approved Plans
dated January 8, 2009 denominated Exhibit “A” and the Color Board dated October
7, 2008 denominated Exhibit “B”. All proposed changes to the Approved Plans
must be submitted in writing with plans showing the changes, including a clouded
set of plans highlighting the changes. Such changes shall be subject to approval in
accordance with Condition A.3, above.
3. Tree Planting. The Property Owner shall not plant any trees that reach 50 feet in
height, at full maturity, within any required rear yard. All proposed trees, as shown
on the Conceptual Landscaping Plan per Exhibit “A”, must be 24 inch box size or
greater. Five of the proposed trees must be of the native species, as defined in
Saratoga Municipal Code Section 15-50.020(n). THIS CONDITION IS
PERMANENT.
4. Stormwater. Disposition and treatment of stormwater shall comply with the
applicable requirements of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
("NPDES") Permit issued to the City of Saratoga and the implementation
standards established by the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution
Prevention Program (collectively the “NPDES Permit Standards”). Prior to
issuance of Zoning Clearance for a Demolition, Grading or Building Permit for
this Project , a Stormwater Detention Plan shall be submitted to the Community
Development Director for review and approval demonstrating how all storm water
will be detained on-site and in compliance with the NPDES Permit Standards. If
not all stormwater can be detained on-site due to topographic, soils or other
constraints, and if complete detention is not otherwise required by the NPDES
Permit Standards, the Project shall be designed to detain on-site the maximum
reasonably feasible amount of stormwater and to direct all excess stormwater
toward stormwater drains, drainage ways, streets or road right-of- ways and
otherwise comply with the NPDES Permit Standards and applicable City Codes.
6. Final Landscape and Irrigation Plan. The Landscape and Irrigation Plan
required by City Code Section 15-45.070(a)(9) shall be designed to the maximum
extent reasonably feasible to:
a. utilize efficient irrigation (where required) to eliminate or reduce runoff, promote
surface infiltration and minimize use of fertilizers and pesticides that have the
potential to contribute to water pollution;
b. treat stormwater and irrigation runoff by incorporating elements that collect,
detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that
are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolonged exposure to water shall be
specified in the Plan, installed and maintained;
c. be comprised of pest resistant landscaping plants throughout the landscaped area,
especially along any hardscape area;
d. be comprised of plant materials selected to be appropriate to site specific
characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of
sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological
consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment;
e. protect the roots of Ordinance-protected trees from any proposed or required
undergrounding of utilities;
f. retain and incorporate existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover into the
Plan;
g. comply with Chapter 15-47 and Section 16-75.030 of the City Code to the extent
applicable;
h. the Final Landscape plan and access to the vineyard is subject to Final Review
and Approval by the Community Development Director.
7. Building Division Submittal. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans shall be
submitted to the Building Division. These plans shall be subject to review and
approval by the Community Development Department Director or designee prior to
issuance of Zoning Clearance. The construction plans shall, at a minimum include
the following:
a. Architectural drawings and other plan sheets consistent with those identified as
Exhibit “A” dated January 8, 2009 on file with the Community Development
Department and referenced in Condition No. 2 above;
b. A note shall be included on the site plan stating that no construction equipment
or private vehicles shall be parked or stored within the root zone five feet beyond
the drip line of any Ordinance-protected tree on the site;
c. The site plan shall contain a note with the following language: “Prior to
foundation inspection by the City, the Licensed Land Surveyor of record shall
provide a written certification that all building setbacks comply with the
Approved Plans,” which note shall represent a condition which must be satisfied
to remain in compliance with this Design Review Approval;
d. This signed and dated Resolution printed onto separate plan pages;
e. A boundary survey, wet-stamped and wet-signed by a Licensed Land Surveyor
or Civil Engineer authorized to practice land surveying. The stamp shall reflect a
current license for the land surveyor/engineer, the document shall be labeled
“Boundary Survey,” and the document shall not contain any disclaimers;
f. City Arborist Reports dated November 17, 2008 printed onto separate
construction plan pages;
g. A final utility plan that shows location of HVAC mechanical equipment outside
of required setback areas;
h. A final Drainage and Grading Plan stamped by a registered Civil Engineer
combined with the above-required Stormwater Detention Plan;
i. A final Landscape and Irrigation Plan; and
j. All additional drawings, plans, maps, reports, and/or materials required by the
Building Division.
8. Fences, Walls and Hedges. All fences, walls and hedges shall conform to height
requirements provided in City Code Article 15-29. Any existing fences or walls not
meeting the zoning ordinance standards shall be removed prior to final planning
inspection.
9. Heating, Ventilation, or Air Conditioning (HVAC). No new or replacement
HVAC mechanical equipment shall be allowed between the lot line and any required
front, side or rear setback.
10. Wood-Burning Fireplaces. Per City Code, one wood-burning fireplace per structure
maybe installed in any new construction.
11. Exterior Lighting. All lighting in connection with the proposed project shall not
produce glare or spillover to adjacent properties.
12. Water Conservation. All newly constructed buildings and irrigation systems shall
be equipped with water conservation plumbing fixtures, satisfactory to the Building
Official.
13. Construction Trucks. All Construction trucks and vehicles shall use designated
truck routes only.
14. Noise and Construction Hours. In order to comply with standards that minimize
impacts to the neighborhood during site preparation and construction, the applicant
shall comply with City Code Sections 7-30.060 and 16-75.050, with respect to noise,
construction hours, maintenance of the construction site and other requirements stated
in these sections.
CITY ARBORIST
15. Arborist Report. All recommendations of the Arborist Report dated November 17,
2008, and incorporated herein by this reference shall be followed and incorporated (in
its entirety) into the plans.
PUBLIC WORKS
16. Final Improvement. The Project Geotechnical Consultant shall review and approve
all geotechnical aspects of the final improvement plans (i.e., site preparation and
grading, site drainage improvements and design parameters for building foundations
and swimming pool) to ensure that the plans, specifications and details accurately
reflect the consultant’s recommendations. The results of the plan review shall be
summarized by the Project Geotechnical Consultant in a letter and submitted to the
City Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
17. Project Construction. The Project Geotechnical Consultant shall inspect, test (as
needed), and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project construction. The
inspections shall include, but not necessarily be limited to: site preparation and
grading, site surface and subsurface drainage improvements, pier excavations, and
retaining walls prior to the placement of fill, steel and concrete. The results of these
inspections and the as-built conditions of the project shall be described by the
geotechnical consultant in a letter(s) and submitted to the City Engineer for review
and approval prior to Final (as-built) Project Approval.
18. Outstanding Fees. The owner (applicant) shall pay any outstanding fees associated
with the City Geotechnical Consultant’s review of the project prior to Zone
Clearance.
19. Hold Harmless agreement. The owner (applicant) shall enter into agreement
holding the City of Saratoga harmless from any claims or liabilities caused by or
arising out of soil or slope instability, slides, slope failure or other soil related and/or
erosion related conditions.
20. Encroachment Permit. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the
Public Works Department for construction within the public right-of-way.
SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
21. Fire Development Review. Owner/applicant shall comply with all Fire Department
requirements.
V. A Building Permit must be issued and construction commenced within 36
months from the date of adoption of this Resolution or approval will expire.
VI. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other
Governmental entities must be met.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of Saratoga, State of California, this 1st
day of April, 2009 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
________________________________________________
Chuck Page, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________________________
Ann Sullivan, City Clerk
This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall
have no force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant, and
Property Owner or Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the
approved terms and conditions and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms
and conditions within the recommended time frames approved by the City Planning
Commission.
__________________________________ _________________________
Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date