HomeMy WebLinkAbout102-Attachment for Urgency Ord.pdf1
AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE CREATING A TEMPORY
MORATORIUM RESTRICTING MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES
FROM BEING LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SARATOGA, TO TAKE EFFECT
IMMEDIATELY
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA FINDS AND DECLARES
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, in 1996 the voters of the State of California approved Proposition 215
which was codified as Health and Safety Code Section 11362.5, et seq., and entitled “The
Compassionate Use Act of 1996” (“the Act”); and
WHEREAS, the intent of the Act was to enable seriously ill persons to obtain, use
and cultivate marijuana for medical use under limited, specified circumstances; and
WHEREAS, on January 1, 2004, Senate Bill 420, the Medical Marijuana Program
Act (“MMPA”), became effective to clarify the scope of the Act and to allow cities and
counties to adopt and enforce rules and regulations consistent with the MMPA and the
Act; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the Act and the MMPA, individuals have established
medical marijuana dispensaries in various cities in California, and
WHEREAS, on June 6, 2005, the United States Supreme Court found in Gonzales
v. Raich, 125 S. Ct. 2195 (2005) there to be no legally recognizable medical necessity
exception under the Federal Controlled Substances Act to the prohibition of possession,
use, manufacture, or distribution of marijuana under federal law, and
WHEREAS, in February 2009 the U.S. Attorney General stated that federal law
enforcement official would ease enforcement at medical marijuana dispensaries, and in
October 2009, the U.S. Department of Justice issued a memorandum stating that federal
resources should not be focused on prosecution of individuals whose actions are in clear
and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for medical use of
marijuana, and
WHEREAS, while the experiences in the regulation and policing of medical
marijuana dispensaries have varied from city to city, several California cities have
reported an increase in crime, such as burglary, robbery, odor, loitering around the
dispensaries, an increase in vehicular traffic and noise in the vicinity of dispensaries, and
the sale of illegal drugs, including the illegal resale of marijuana from dispensaries, in the
areas immediately surrounding such medical marijuana dispensaries, and
WHEREAS, The City of Saratoga has not adopted rules and regulations specifically
applicable to the establishment and operation of medical marijuana dispensaries and the
2
lack of such controls may lead to an establishment of dispensaries and the inability for
the City to regulate these establishments in a manner that will protect the general public,
homes and businesses adjacent and near such businesses, and the patients or clients of
such establishments, and
WHEREAS, based on the lack of any consistent experience of cities statewide and
in the absence of any regulatory program in the City regarding the review of the
establishment and operation of medical dispensaries, the City should consider whether
negative effects on the public health, safety, and welfare may occur in the City of
Saratoga as a result of the operation of medical marijuana dispensaries and the lack of
appropriate regulations governing the establishment and operation of such facilities, and
WHEREAS, City staff requires time to evaluate the relevant issues and develop
guidance for legally appropriate regulation, and
WHEREAS, the establishment of, or the issuance or approval of any permit,
certificate of occupancy, or other entitlement for the legal establishment of a medical
marijuana dispensary in the City of Saratoga will result in a current and immediate threat
to public health, safety and welfare in that the Saratoga Municipal Code does not
currently regulate the location and operation of medical marijuana dispensaries and does
not have a regulatory program in effect that will appropriately regulate the location,
establishment, and operation of medical dispensaries in the City, and
WHEREAS, there is no feasible alternative to satisfactorily study the potential
impact identified above as well or better than the adoption of this interim urgency
moratorium ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of
Saratoga as follows:
SECTION 1. For purposes of this ordinance, “medical marijuana dispensary”
means any for profit or not-for-profit facility or location, whether permanent or
temporary, where the owner(s) or operator(s) intends to or does possess and
distribute marijuana for any purpose.
SECTION 2. For the period of this ordinance, or any extension thereof, a
medical marijuana dispensary shall be considered a prohibited use in any zoning
district of the City, even if located within an otherwise permitted use. No permits
or authorizations for a medical marijuana dispensary shall issue while this
ordinance is in effect.
SECTION 3. The City Manager or his designees shall: (1) review and consider
options for the regulation of medical marijuana dispensaries in the City, including,
but not limited to, the development of appropriate rules and regulations governing
the location and operation of such establishments in the City; (2) meet with medical
patients, advocates, law enforcement representatives, and other interested parties;
3
and (3) provide to the City Council a written report describing the measures which
the City has taken to address the conditions which led to the adoption of this
ordinance.
SECTION 4. The City Council finds that this ordinance is not subject to the
California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably
foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the
activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) (Title 14, of the California
Code of Regulations) because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to
the environment, directly or indirectly; it prevents changes in the environment
pending the completion of the contemplated Municipal Code review.
SECTION 5. This interim urgency ordinance is adopted pursuant to Section
65858 of the California Government Code.
SECTION 6. This interim urgency ordinance shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council. This interim urgency
ordinance shall continue in effect for forty-five (45) days from the date of its
adoption and shall thereafter be of no further force and effect unless, after notice
pursuant to California Government Code Section 65090 and a public hearing, the
City Council extends this interim urgency ordinance for an additional period of time
pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858.
SECTION 7. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause,
phrase or word in this Ordinance or any part hereof is for any reason, held to be
unconstitutional or invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction
such decision shall not affect the validity of effectiveness of the remaining portions
of the Ordinance or any part hereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would
have passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,
subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases or words be declared
unconstitutional.
SECTION 8. This ordinance or a comprehensive summary thereof shall be
published in a newspaper of general circulation of the City of Saratoga within
fifteen days after its adoption.
[Continued next page.]
4
The foregoing ordinance was introduced and read at the regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Saratoga held on the 18th day of November, 2009, and was
adopted by at least a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council as follows:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
SIGNED:
__________________________________
CHUCK PAGE
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA
Saratoga, California
ATTEST:
__________________________________
ANN SULLIVAN
CLERK OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA
Saratoga, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________________
RICHARD TAYLOR, CITY ATTORNEY