HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-05-1993 CITY COUNCIL AGENDAEXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO.
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
Z 3a�
MEETING DATE: May 5, 1993
ORIGINATING DEPT. Environmental Programs
AGENDA ITEM
CITY MGR.
SUBJECT: Saratoga Creek Sediment Sampling Report
Recommended Motion(s): Note and File
Report Summary: The attached report was prepared by Santa Clara
Valley Water District (SCVWD) staff in response to the City's
request. The study consisted of collecting sediment samples from
four locations on Saratoga Creek. The sediment samples were
analyzed for total oil and grease, petroleum oil and grease, total
organic carbon (TOC), Title 22 metals and moisture. The
conclusions included in the Saratoga Creek Sediment Sampling Report
are:
1) The sediments do not appear to be classified as a hazardous
waste under State of California or federal regulations.
2) The soils appear to be suitable for wetland creation based on
the data when compared to the RWQCB SSC.
3) The levels of oil and grease do not warrant additional
investigation as compared to the guidance applicable to
underground storage tank releases in Santa Clara County.
4) The results of this preliminary sampling program do not
support any further investigation for the chemical
constituents analyzed for in this study.
Fiscal Impacts: None. The cost of the study was borne by SCVWD.
Follow Up Actions: None at this time. The Regional Water Quality
Control Board has not issued comments on this report.
Consequences of Not Acting on the Recommended Motions: N/A
9
SARATOGA CREEK
SEDIMENT SAMPLING REPORT
Prepared by
David G. Matthews Water Quality Specialist II
Ngoc H. Nguyen Associate Engineer
under the direction of
Beau Goldie, P.E., R.E.A.
Supervising Engineer
Environmental Compliance Division
MARCH 1993
SARATOGA CREEK
SEDIMENT SAMPLING REPORT
INTRODUCTION
This presents the preliminary results of the sediment sampling program for Saratoga Creek. The
sampling was conducted in response to public concerns regarding the presence of oil and grease and toxic
heavy metals within the channel sediments. The sampling program is considered preliminary because
only a select number of analytes were investigated from a limited geographic region.. The sampling
program was not intended to characterize the entire channel for all potential contaminants.
SITE DESCRIPTION
Saratoga Creek (Creek) drains the Saratoga Creek watershed. The Creek runs in an easterly direction
from the summit and roughly parallels Highway 9 as shown in Figure 1, Vicinity Map. The Creek runs
through the city of Saratoga, small unincorporated areas of the County, the city of Santa Clara, and the
city of San Jose. The Creek has a confluence with San Tomas Aquino Creek near the intersection of San
Tomas Expressway and Monroe Street in Santa Clara. The ultimate discharge of the San Tomas Aquino
Creek is the San Francisco Bay.
The sampling area extends from just upstream of the Fourth Street bridge in Saratoga to approximately
800 feet downstream of the Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road Bridge as shown in Figure 2, Site Map. The area
immediately adjacent to the Creek sampling area is developed as commercial (restaurants and small
shops), residential, and a public park.
METHODOLOGY
Four surface soil samples were collected as shown in Figure 2. Sample A was collected from the
northern side of the Creek approximately 30 feet upstream of the Fourth Street bridge. The Creek has
several outfalls between this area and Wildwood Park which appear to drain run -off water from the
adjacent properties and roadways. Sample B was collected on the southern side of the Creek very close
to the end of the new pedestrian bridge that provides access to Wildwood Park. Sample C was collected
on the northern side of the Creek immediately (approximately 15 feet) downstream of the major outfall
that is located underneath the Saratoga- Sunnyvale Road bridge. Sample D was collected on the northern
side of the Creek approximately 800 feet downstream of Sample C.
All four samples were collected from surface sediments, upper 6 inches of sediments, that were
approximately 6 inches above the waterline of February 16, 1993. The samples were pushed into
laboratory decontaminated 1 -liter wide mouth glass sample jars. Disposable gloves were used. in the
process and changed in between samples to prevent cross contamination. The sample jars were
completely filled to minimize headspace and lids were secured on the sample jars with duct tape. The
samples were labeled with a waterproof permanent marker. The sample from location "A" was
designated SAR293A. For all four samples, the sample location corresponds to the sample number. The
samples were chilled immediately and continuously using blue ice and a sample cooler until being placed
in the Santa Clara Valley Water District's (District) sample refrigerator. The samples remained in the
sample refrigerator until the courier picked up the samples on February 17, 1993. Chain of custody
documentation was maintained and appears in Appendix A.
CT0329a
X
All of the samples were analyzed for total oil and grease (EPA Method 5520E), petroleum oil and grease
(EPA Method 5520F), total organic carbon (EPA Method 415. 1), Title 22 metals, and percentage
moisture. A sieve analysis was performed on each of the four samples in accordance with ASTM D-422.
With the exception of the organic carbon, the analyses were performed by Pacific Environmental
Laboratory which is certified by the Cal -EPA to perform these methods. The organic carbon analysis
was performed by D &M Laboratories who are. Cal -EPA certified. to. perform, this method.
The analytical methods selected were based on the types of chemicals likely to be encountered. The oils,
greases, and heavy metals that were suspected are associated with areas impacted by vehicular traffic and
commercial development. These contaminants are relatively stable (do not readily volatilize) in surface
sediments and were appropriate analytes for this reason. The priority pollutant (Method 8240) scan was
not performed because these contaminants are very volatile and typically would not survive in surficial
sediments. The semivolatile scan (Method 8270) was not performed because these chemical constituents
are uncommon and are generally not used by the local industries.
RESULTS
The analytical results from the four samples are summarized in Table 1. Copies of the laborAtory report
are contained in Appendix A. Results less than the detection limit are considered nondetectable. All
samples were analyzed within the holding time recommended for each method.
The levels of petroleum oil and grease range from nondetectable to 72 parts per million (ppm). None
of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22 metals were detected at concentrations above the
Total Threshold Limit Concentration CFrLC) values or more than ten times the Soluble Threshold Limit
Concentration (STLC) values, as defined by the CCR Title 22, Section 66261.24(a)(2). The Waste
Extraction Test ,(WET) involves a tenfold dilution of the sample before the analysis is performed.
Therefore, this test is only performed when the levels exceed ten times the STLC values.
Table 2. provides a comparison of the inorganics found in Creek . and CCR Title 22,
Section 66261.24(a)(2) levels for TTLC and STLC values. Newly adopted (December 1992) Interim
Final Sediment Screening Criteria and Testing Requirements for Wetland Creation and Upland Beneficial
Reuse (SSC) adopted by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) under
Resolution 92 -145 threshold limits also appear in Table 2.. Multiple sets of threshold limits are presented
in the SSC interim standards. The SSC values cited in Table 2 represent the chemical concentrations
acceptable for the potential use of sediments in wetland creation and are the most stringent. The levels
found in the sediments in Creek do not meet or exceed any of the threshold limits mentioned above.
DISCUSSION
The results of the chemical analysis indicate that the sediment samples are not classified as a hazardous
waste by the State of California under CCR Title 22. The analyses performed as per 22 CCR
Section 66261.24(x)(2) is believed to be the most applicable analysis required under 22 CCR, Article 3.
No analysis was performed for ignitability, corrosivity, or reactivity because the sediments are not
expected to exhibit any of these characteristics. The samples were not analyzed for solubility of heavy
metals using the federal methodology, Toxic Characteristic Leaching Potential (TCLP), or the state
methodology, WET, because the levels of metals encountered do not warrant performing additional
solubility analyses. The TCLP involves a twentyfold dilution of the sample prior to analysis, which is
why this analysis was not performed.
CT0329a 2
S
The levels of petroleum oil and grease contamination do not classify the sediments as state or federal
hazardous waste. On a federal level, petroleum contaminated soils are exempted from consideration as
a hazardous waste (40 CFR 261.4(c)). On a state level, there are no specific regulatory levels established
for oil and grease contamination. The underground storage tank program in Santa Clara County,
administered by the District with policies. approved. by the RWQCB, uses, 100 ppm petroleum
hydrocarbons as the threshold for necessitating further investigation of a UST release. The sample results
from Creek are below this threshold.
There are currently no known criteria established for Creek sediments. The only available sediment
criteria are the SSC. The sample results are well below the numeric values used in sediment screening
for the creation of wetlands.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results of the sampling event reported herein, the following conclusions are presented:
1. The sediments do not appear to be classified as a hazardous waste under State of California or
federal regulations.
2. The soils appear to be suitable for wetland creation based on the data when compared to the
RWQCB SSC.
3. The levels of oil and grease do not warrant additional investigation as compared to the guidance
applicable to underground storage tank releases in Santa Clara County.
4. The results of this preliminary sampling program do not support any further investigation for the
chemical constituents analyzed for in this study.
CT0329a
6
3
.lir . c
.
1(,�• 9 g t by
d
/ - �r-
..or. ca ( �u b
_ C A • V`\.a a 1 a O� ♦� OaRM.a( a t_ar I .,r g o .� f� wpwtr RI) erDP'a[
• ,•� °O.ai V ° «W Oa aar[ eO R Y e rf� aR Oa ( 1(4+:c rF( CT �$ lr? . ^' CrnUr Lr
«F 0•CNa ! •�.P r S `Gull �o t c °a a a OOa t r \
K 7 i(a •c[ [ 3A 7= r P a C 0
v: ••` l« y`ti `y 1. t - - r.O,a .. Y t lTA A a0.trW1 yi i Alagr '7 O
^•/ CKl c 1w �f l' r -�aJRI :Y.i Oa CJ `V4
"1. r(cr `� •a.[• ¢ a e+ '� SOW:. =:rK lS S a f rtra 8' d °+I ta0 _ i(l 'C`. D: ` C'S
1000bJ: K' � :.. rao 8 QJ4 awe ar foe •oa _ e ear oA r t o.:: - . u 4 fa. �r !'�' x ,.a.:
..yi,• • < ! +r CO
f:: t ' - $t.. as • ! i
,�r rrt cur. � r � a c � 4, •. - a Y(a
1..,...:. . _ - .: �•" ° r <- µl tT � � � : � .[ao ■• cYrr cT c r ,po(/( `° � c : .
rMi ; a[a % ,.r a. •ttUa'C v . > ii •(: c Y lr r �' C
Og
r,:[ �i _ �• - _ .' � i- .. .. o • 0.1 a f•. s {� - CC[10• x � tr y \� .�° jjcc � � Cps a.t'
'0r COar a`�` _ _ �$ = c v a - -' v .a yJ4'r4 c•Z a 1 «`° � KN- l X11
• `'� `\ of ARCO[l10 «� _Y-. �_ •:° a £ ° t ( fC C\ en �eJ ��. f3s a.1��• t r.a a a£i 1•[a a _I `4 �I °IF
_'�• ~`��- ,�'� + f / .° - ♦4P0 4r � C,.i lYo Q ` ! ri C,'+wu
:v /•. - °➢ c •�
or q T '. w•r• `• •cMUarl,. am .ui:ai`'AYE
• a r 1 k �S:Ca
'f�'
1 c uco•aO var .Y° a` . .o .h n�ie �`a y o(w+ �.. R.
• mar -�i: Or' < cr .a ...• .: Q +<Q ��' Q. .. -o a r(EWRaI c
\�Q• uCt� � _ N ♦ (n� d ` Eon r - tt. ..= I..- t[ � ��Ci y •�•�rw � _ -ra «a 'c Co
$AR�ITOGA by r _ _ « e �" _:«... 'T . � ya 9 Y - e .R
tt� \r, < d, ^aE C[ �� Cr r 3. it ..•oRta(.
J • • d• aral M r I \dT 1( �•[r . «�
`\ r pa e M Or.'a' len`Bra
o,
rR r' ° +J C b° a o o-e >�•J L .. .r
_ r -• r �' �° c� ° _. _ \ « R (: [i r ia10• as
C / �`a4 • :• c t (• < ` : aY as NaA r1. �,i' yt'` ` t l 4u[ t. \i L l• •:' i \ e 1 nb f� ].�
Sr.\ \ 4 L : oo atP \� n. a w w� " Q i °` 4+ m �� _. k+ �'� n• .
^ ° +, �rr� r�rtNlw.r i� \V> wa iC >La• \ °�
VII a I
% \°�O c...o. e.t:;atc.:rr• =•a _ Y.aa R> E 0 ``o. VP's 4 ,? Y "a�,_� --° OTUr 3.'crJ�_ _ c� �3` �' °.+�•
Aa rJ S T U D
Y AREA
J ` ' R� — \� I • •: \.1r lY %[T tRll' NIN
a, :a OTRIY/1 �� ^ < c .t \� — M1�• •�'�
.ar �`�' � : na h - \� - - i t :r•• uy r C \,. � ca ..r �` •�. Col1.0• .° t « - : I '. - : ro � '�
_ . .:1 " `�, = SARATOGA — .�`�,, '„ �` •+:: 1 +4 ^ y -�t A ` CE
0i S ,
- \Oi( .y - y' - 0..•S _ aA W ' -�• � s �• <
<• 3 (.: t F ' ,` - •J'" ; ,a+K? c r Y4r i> a : s4 ? r ' J( r�t� o`i Ra �o�r` '
4` - ^ ` % • 'f ° I'< mrr� Cie a Q4-at- L
°c'
ass
���* �` • ... _'-1�!�•• 33f`�;y� � 'ff �_ J Qq7` '_ J � ^ ° ; -ts = 'j 'r "a \-a (t tLs- tic
t
(L
At•R` a•*'a' �i Y ' /•la ♦� i 1 ♦a. y Rf 111 [1 •• • u r ! r, �.
lo••. :tt3� 9 77�, E cV. ;o • 7 's !.•- C.S.:S _: X1.0.0.[. MOtl[ r i� to
° � SARATO :GA o
4. tat a \a ` " �• C a� y4�a. I .. a -AST
aL SD. T Ol(000 ! _.. � � e � . �� � . V _ � Shut <� Cl4
.a c. Sl • O. -^``l Nae•b+ waw d i - « 'Cc?
. 1 raa:4 a W
fr•- -P =Crtck-i: -. • . ?� - `� +_b'.+�t>.. , • �C`u. _ tj: � �• \
r -- akoi;e �� % '4 .,.a [ .a W s• a>ns?n� T. -� . �3 R
ardcni 'Ora •e.nrRrr = I N% S. < : e _ I qa:..0 •., .1a i�° o .,, 8 V CrKF 4r<rc
�r Zrct4 •. -
ONT
' j �.� o !r R fry ^ y ♦• b •:•x. � SER
PA ar 'a r rari ��. �� tl
r
_ e\(• f! i� . -_. _ - ' .� .. _ _ ._ iT.-r t u[toR, ff
.t. et .. Villi :c - _ '� FRS *a0L ._ •.ar
' dr.
Mont al YO. rtM Fa, +' . �Tp NtpO10i .•O.7 . /._ :c
°
'Arboretum � ° a� \ta c`a •fit^ �o d •� t
\
rv_ Cougt•y- ___ c0rl- tea— e'a��,t`'\ - •d ' R ar �\
o ° •( i a Ir
� J (� - � � : +. � i•:. '•• tic � +.r< ri o.. g.:
Park ; 4J g • �' + s / • •
- -
..FIGURE _ 1
i o Ja L, I• ,• d `. F
_ R 0.t3T:
' VICINITY MAP
I I + tO[aT i ;,�° [ NTS '
1.3 J=
1 M. cat" Ci u :.t
C
iCRa ^.�
-
+C' <•
- >`Y '
CARO(%r(AC(CT
A
URO(a T(NAAC[ 0
71 W-
�rw
tea( as •
♦
lava
9 -
11::r
1 ;i -nONw
�J
a
u(4 a'� .J
.lir . c
.
1(,�• 9 g t by
d
/ - �r-
..or. ca ( �u b
_ C A • V`\.a a 1 a O� ♦� OaRM.a( a t_ar I .,r g o .� f� wpwtr RI) erDP'a[
• ,•� °O.ai V ° «W Oa aar[ eO R Y e rf� aR Oa ( 1(4+:c rF( CT �$ lr? . ^' CrnUr Lr
«F 0•CNa ! •�.P r S `Gull �o t c °a a a OOa t r \
K 7 i(a •c[ [ 3A 7= r P a C 0
v: ••` l« y`ti `y 1. t - - r.O,a .. Y t lTA A a0.trW1 yi i Alagr '7 O
^•/ CKl c 1w �f l' r -�aJRI :Y.i Oa CJ `V4
"1. r(cr `� •a.[• ¢ a e+ '� SOW:. =:rK lS S a f rtra 8' d °+I ta0 _ i(l 'C`. D: ` C'S
1000bJ: K' � :.. rao 8 QJ4 awe ar foe •oa _ e ear oA r t o.:: - . u 4 fa. �r !'�' x ,.a.:
..yi,• • < ! +r CO
f:: t ' - $t.. as • ! i
,�r rrt cur. � r � a c � 4, •. - a Y(a
1..,...:. . _ - .: �•" ° r <- µl tT � � � : � .[ao ■• cYrr cT c r ,po(/( `° � c : .
rMi ; a[a % ,.r a. •ttUa'C v . > ii •(: c Y lr r �' C
Og
r,:[ �i _ �• - _ .' � i- .. .. o • 0.1 a f•. s {� - CC[10• x � tr y \� .�° jjcc � � Cps a.t'
'0r COar a`�` _ _ �$ = c v a - -' v .a yJ4'r4 c•Z a 1 «`° � KN- l X11
• `'� `\ of ARCO[l10 «� _Y-. �_ •:° a £ ° t ( fC C\ en �eJ ��. f3s a.1��• t r.a a a£i 1•[a a _I `4 �I °IF
_'�• ~`��- ,�'� + f / .° - ♦4P0 4r � C,.i lYo Q ` ! ri C,'+wu
:v /•. - °➢ c •�
or q T '. w•r• `• •cMUarl,. am .ui:ai`'AYE
• a r 1 k �S:Ca
'f�'
1 c uco•aO var .Y° a` . .o .h n�ie �`a y o(w+ �.. R.
• mar -�i: Or' < cr .a ...• .: Q +<Q ��' Q. .. -o a r(EWRaI c
\�Q• uCt� � _ N ♦ (n� d ` Eon r - tt. ..= I..- t[ � ��Ci y •�•�rw � _ -ra «a 'c Co
$AR�ITOGA by r _ _ « e �" _:«... 'T . � ya 9 Y - e .R
tt� \r, < d, ^aE C[ �� Cr r 3. it ..•oRta(.
J • • d• aral M r I \dT 1( �•[r . «�
`\ r pa e M Or.'a' len`Bra
o,
rR r' ° +J C b° a o o-e >�•J L .. .r
_ r -• r �' �° c� ° _. _ \ « R (: [i r ia10• as
C / �`a4 • :• c t (• < ` : aY as NaA r1. �,i' yt'` ` t l 4u[ t. \i L l• •:' i \ e 1 nb f� ].�
Sr.\ \ 4 L : oo atP \� n. a w w� " Q i °` 4+ m �� _. k+ �'� n• .
^ ° +, �rr� r�rtNlw.r i� \V> wa iC >La• \ °�
VII a I
% \°�O c...o. e.t:;atc.:rr• =•a _ Y.aa R> E 0 ``o. VP's 4 ,? Y "a�,_� --° OTUr 3.'crJ�_ _ c� �3` �' °.+�•
Aa rJ S T U D
Y AREA
J ` ' R� — \� I • •: \.1r lY %[T tRll' NIN
a, :a OTRIY/1 �� ^ < c .t \� — M1�• •�'�
.ar �`�' � : na h - \� - - i t :r•• uy r C \,. � ca ..r �` •�. Col1.0• .° t « - : I '. - : ro � '�
_ . .:1 " `�, = SARATOGA — .�`�,, '„ �` •+:: 1 +4 ^ y -�t A ` CE
0i S ,
- \Oi( .y - y' - 0..•S _ aA W ' -�• � s �• <
<• 3 (.: t F ' ,` - •J'" ; ,a+K? c r Y4r i> a : s4 ? r ' J( r�t� o`i Ra �o�r` '
4` - ^ ` % • 'f ° I'< mrr� Cie a Q4-at- L
°c'
ass
���* �` • ... _'-1�!�•• 33f`�;y� � 'ff �_ J Qq7` '_ J � ^ ° ; -ts = 'j 'r "a \-a (t tLs- tic
t
(L
At•R` a•*'a' �i Y ' /•la ♦� i 1 ♦a. y Rf 111 [1 •• • u r ! r, �.
lo••. :tt3� 9 77�, E cV. ;o • 7 's !.•- C.S.:S _: X1.0.0.[. MOtl[ r i� to
° � SARATO :GA o
4. tat a \a ` " �• C a� y4�a. I .. a -AST
aL SD. T Ol(000 ! _.. � � e � . �� � . V _ � Shut <� Cl4
.a c. Sl • O. -^``l Nae•b+ waw d i - « 'Cc?
. 1 raa:4 a W
fr•- -P =Crtck-i: -. • . ?� - `� +_b'.+�t>.. , • �C`u. _ tj: � �• \
r -- akoi;e �� % '4 .,.a [ .a W s• a>ns?n� T. -� . �3 R
ardcni 'Ora •e.nrRrr = I N% S. < : e _ I qa:..0 •., .1a i�° o .,, 8 V CrKF 4r<rc
�r Zrct4 •. -
ONT
' j �.� o !r R fry ^ y ♦• b •:•x. � SER
PA ar 'a r rari ��. �� tl
r
_ e\(• f! i� . -_. _ - ' .� .. _ _ ._ iT.-r t u[toR, ff
.t. et .. Villi :c - _ '� FRS *a0L ._ •.ar
' dr.
Mont al YO. rtM Fa, +' . �Tp NtpO10i .•O.7 . /._ :c
°
'Arboretum � ° a� \ta c`a •fit^ �o d •� t
\
rv_ Cougt•y- ___ c0rl- tea— e'a��,t`'\ - •d ' R ar �\
o ° •( i a Ir
� J (� - � � : +. � i•:. '•• tic � +.r< ri o.. g.:
Park ; 4J g • �' + s / • •
- -
..FIGURE _ 1
i o Ja L, I• ,• d `. F
_ R 0.t3T:
' VICINITY MAP
I I + tO[aT i ;,�° [ NTS '
1
,s
awl
SAMPLE A
SITE MAP
/y FOOTHILL Dee
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
SAMPLE B
n
SAMPLE D
Z
C4 oo,�
o _ cz�QQ0
SAMPLE
�1
h wO
• C
��
TABLE I
SARATOGA CREEK
ANALYTICAL DATA SUMMARY
Sample Date: February -16, 1993
SAMPLE NUMBER.
ANALYTE
5520 E (TOTAL OIL &
GREASE)
< 25
76
< 25
40
5520 F (TOTAL PETROLEUM
OIL & GREASE)
_ < 25
72
< 25
40
415 .1 (TOTAL ORGANIC
CARBON)
2,500
3,100
2,200
2,600
PERCENT MOISTURE
21.11
23.46
25.38
__ 25.39
ANTIMONY
< 5
< 5
< 5
< 5
ARSENIC
3.1
3.6
2.7
2.5
BARIUM
70
73
74
65
BERYLLIUM
0.7
0.7
.0.6
0.5
CADMIUM
< 0.2
< 0.2
< 0.2
<0.2-
CHROMIUM
27
25
22
20
COBALT
7
8
7
7
COPPER
24
25
23
19
LEAD
12
12
12
12
MERCURY
< 0.05
< 0.05
< 0.05
< 0.05
MOLYBDENUM
<1
<1
<1
<1
NICKEL
31
31
29
25
SELENIUM
<0.3
< 0.3
< 0.3
< 0.3
SILVER
<1
<1
<1
<1
THALLIUM
<0.3
< 0.3
< 0.3
< 0.3
VANADIUM
25
26
23
20
ZINC
47
47
43
38
Note: 1. All units in harts
Der on
2. The 0 <' sign indicates the analytical limits of detection
w
TABLE 2
SARATOGA CREEK
ANALYTICAL DATA COMPARISON
Sample Date: February 16, 1993
ANALYTE
�Lghest of 2/93
TTLCI
STLC2`
WETLANDS
....:: ;::::
>: >: >:....::;Saml Ies:.::.....
CREATION
5520 E (TOTAL OIL& GREASE)
76
NE
NE
NE
5520 F O I'L PETROLEUM OIL & GR;ASE)
72
NE
NE
NE
415 .1 (TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON)
3,100
NE
NE
NE
PERCENT MOISTURE
25.39
NE
NE
NE
ANTIMONY
<5
500
15
NE
ARSENIC
3.6
500
5
<33
BARIUM
74
10,000
100
NE
BERYLLIUM
0.7
75
.75
NE
CADMIUM
<0.2
100
1
<5
CHROMIUM
27
2,500
560
<220
COBALT
8
8,000
80
NE
COPPER
25
2,500
25
<90
LEAD
12
1,000
5
<50
MERCURY
<0.05
20
0.2
<0.35
MOLYBDENUM
<1
3,500
350
NE
NICKEL
31
2,000
20
<140
SELENIUM
<0.3
100
1
<0.7
SILVER
<1
500
5
<1
THALLIUM
<0.3
700
1 7
NE
VANADIUM
26
2,400
24
NE
ZINC
47
5,000
250
< 160
NE = Not Established
Note: All units in parts per million
1 Total Threshold Limit Concentration, California Code of Regulations Title 22
2 Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration, California Code of Regulations Title 22
3 Interim Final Sediment Screening Criteria and Testing Requirements for Wetland Creation and Upland
Beneficial Use, RWQCB Interim Final, December 1992.
to
APPENDIX A
LABORATORY DATA
D&M Laboratories
ANALYTICAL DATA REPORT Collected: 16-FES-93
Prepared for: Kennedy /Jenks /Chilton, Lab. Division Received: 18-fEB-93
Project Id: 18-FES-93/TN Reported: 05-MAR-93
Sample Id: DKO1612
Lab Id: L9302519-1
................
TOC 2500
50. m9 /K9 I
P,E- E It V E D
1993
PACIFIC ENVIRONMIENTAL
080RATORIES
Oc . .... .........
...... T. . . .
.........
TOC 3100 50. mg/Kg
RECEIVED
NlAH 0 9 1993
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL
LABORATORIES
D&M Laboratories
ANALYTICAL DATA REPORT
Prepared for:
Kennedy/JenksjChi L ton, Lab. Division
Collected:
16- FEB -93
Project Id:
18-FEB-93/TN
Received:
Reported:
18-FEB-93
05-KAR-93,
Sanple Id:
DKO1613
Lab Id:
L9302519-2
............... . a
Oc . .... .........
...... T. . . .
.........
TOC 3100 50. mg/Kg
RECEIVED
NlAH 0 9 1993
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL
LABORATORIES
TOC 2200 50. mg /K9 1
1V
RE "E'VED
MAR 0.9 1993
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL
LABORATORIES
0&N Laboratories
ANALYTICAL DATA REPORT
Prepared for:
Kennedy /Jenks /Chilton, Lab. Division
Collected:
Received:
1 - FEB -93
188- FEB -93
Project Id:
18-FEB-93/TN
Reported:
05- MAR -93
Sample Id:
DK01614
Lab Id:
L9302519 -3
;�w:«:�..�:�::,:�:e�- �:��o+�•-
.-:<.;.r• ,. .:<- .,.. :, .�..:: >.,.:<���. 8. ::.: ;:::i�#i €:Cga• -:
-- - ti.
.....:::•:- ::::::::::Pa�reuie±tu;
.....,..,:...,,. �,..: xA. Y. xw.k.,. �.
>::::: :: -;::. .. -::: •.
k..... ..:,,.,:.,,..,M ....:........w.. ..ss-�:,,..:�,...
TOC 2200 50. mg /K9 1
1V
RE "E'VED
MAR 0.9 1993
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL
LABORATORIES
D&1 Laboratories
ANALYTICAL DATA REPORT
Prepared for: Kemedy /Jenks /Chilton, Lab. Division Collected: 16- FEB -93
Project Id: 18- FES-93 /TN Received: -AR -93
05- MKAR
Sample Id: DK01615 Reported: 05-93
Lab Id: L9302519 -4
tt'EGt;Ld » »At�a:': : :.' �`°, a ;�"'oa'•':ac",,:u:K::m >:;?:;: >.
.. .,.. ....... . �: �: 4r..;., ::: ::::� >:.;:.:•::: :.�......,.: :.? - < -•w -: � .:..� .. �"`€ Ys:, �'<;';;<; D��urian>:<::: � :::,...V:,..:A:..,,..,...�.k�.. i' ���a ;;<:,w;;.:,;..:,::.: :-;;;::;:::
„ w..,:: cu;,::-.,,,: �. a�. e. 4: a: xa:, w:.; �: o:N M•: ..:.. s..,,,,,,..- Nw.«;.:,.:.. :,.:..:.:<:. «<:;.:.<.,,«,..,..-
TOC 2600 50. mg /Kg 1
RECEIVED
MAR 0 9 1993
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL
LABORATORIES
LABORATORY REPORT PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY.
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
415- 243 -2580
For Santa Clara Valley Water District
Attention Ms. Carol Presley Received 02/17/93
Address 5750 Almaden Expressway Reported 03/09/93,
San Jose, CA 95118
source:
Saratoga Creek (SAR293)
Lab. No.:
DKO1612
Sample I.D.:
SAR 293A
Matrix:
Soil
Depth:
--
Date Collected:
02/16/93 ,
Time Collected:
--
Collected by:
SCVWD
Date Extracted:
02/18/93
Date Analyzed:
02/19/93
1 M th d•
--
Analytica e o
Analysis units Analytical Results
Oil & Grease (1) mg /Kg
Petroleum Hydrocargon
Fraction of Oil
and Grease (2) mg /Kg
<25
<25
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Det. Lim.
25
25
Comments: (1) Analysis by Standard Method 5520 E. (2) Analysis by Standard
Method 5520 F. Results reported in milligrams per kil am.
Analyst Rita Sheidcrant Manager
Tbb tepoft applia only to the sample iavestigatod and is net neo"UnV indicative d the qu&q of apparently identical or simBar ampke. Mw lisbUy of the h1k nd«y is jiimiod to
the amount paid for the nepod by the iswee. Mw istateo assumes all liabft fa the fiu&w d'udsibotion of tbis report or its eantnnts and by making smh dialntAion agroea to Loll me
W3=tory harmless against ill chima of pcnms so iofasmod of the CCntc1lb bcwd-
/w
LABORATORY REPORT PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
415- 243 -2580
For Santa Clara Valley Water District
Attention Ms. Carol Presley Received 02/17/93
Address 5750 Almaden Expressway Reported 03 /09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Quality-Control Page
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Source:
Saratoga Creek (SAR293)
Lab. No.:
DKO1612 -
Sample I.D.:
SAR 293A
Matrix:
Soil
Death:
--
Date Collected:
02/16/93
Time Collected:
--
Collected by:
SCVWD
Date Extracted:
02/18/93
Date Analyzed:
02/19/93
Analytical Method:
--
Analysis units Analytical Results Replicate Det. Lim.
Oil & Grease (1) mg /Kg
Petroleum Hydrocargon
Fraction of Oil
and Grease (2)
<25 <25 Spk. Rec. 94%
<25 <25
25
25
Comments: (1) Analysis by Standard Method 5520 E. (2) Analysis by Standard
Method 5520 F. Results,reported in milligrams per kilogram.
Analyst Rita Sheidgant Manager
lUs apm applies mly to &a aaotple iwadkftd and is not mmus ly iodieatim of mo quOW of apparently idaiial a similar ampla. MW L'abMW of the hV=ftq iti-lmtiwd a
the amoaot paid for the report by me iaaooe Mw imm aw ma aR liabift fac the 0 u-1 dimt3tp m of this mepmt at ib cankam and by matottg meL distabW= W= to MM the
laboratory banakm against all claims of persons so iafamed of the oonte.mb baW.
LABORATORY REPORT- PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY`
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA-94107
415- 243 -2580
For Santa Clara Valley Water District
Attention Ms. Carol Presley Received 02/17/93
Address 5750 Almaden Expressway Reported 03/09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Source:
Saratoga Creek (SAR293)
Lab. No.:
DKO1613
Sample I.D.:
SAR 293B
Matrix:
Soil
Depth:
--
Date Collected:
02/16/93
Time Collected:
--
Collected by:
SCVWD
Date Extracted:
02/18/93
Date Analyzed:
02/19/93
Analytical Method:
-- - -.
Analysis Units Analytical Results Det. Lim.
Oil & Grease (1) mg /Kg 76 25
Petroleum Hydrocargon
Fraction of Oil
and Grease (2) mg/Kg 72
25
Comments: (1) Analysis by Standard Method.5520 E. (2) Analysis by Standard
Method 5520 F. Results reported in milligrams per kilogram.
Analyst Rita Sheidaant Manager J=4�
Tbis ggmt pplim onty to the sample mvedk tea and h doe w=mnly k&=dm of ma q=HW of Mpua tly Wwfwd «.im9w mmim TLo HAZW of mo Lbamtay b imbed w
me amount paid for the .Ww by 16e iss = Tbo bmee assumra all f abft for the fud w d6ugm = of this wpm ar b 000tecb and by asaldog soeh &swWtim astea to hoM do
hboratay harmless apiaA all ehims of pamm so iofamod of ft 000tats hued.
A
LABORATORY REPORT PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
415- 243 -2580
For Santa Clara Valley Water District
Attention Ms. Carol Presley Received 02/17/93
Address 5750 Almaden Expressway Reported 03/09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Source:
Saratoga Creek (SAR293)
Lab. No.:
DKO1614
Sample I.D.:
SAR 293C
Matrix:
Soil
Depth:
--
Date Collected:
02/16/93
Time Collected:
- --
Collected by:
SCVWD
Date Extracted:
02/18/93
Date Analyzed:
02/19/93
Analytical Method:
-- --
Analysis units Analytical Results Det. Lim.
Oil & Grease (1) mg /Kg <25 25
Petroleum Hydrocargon
Fraction of Oil
and Grease (2) mg /Kg -25 25
Comments: (1) Analysis by Standard Method 5520 E. (2) Analysis by Standard
Method 5520 F. Results reported in milligrams per kilogram.
Analyst Rita Sheidgant Manager
` This npmt gprm ay b do wpb irmftawd and b am neauanly iodieatin of do gwiity of apps cc* idmecd a a ed b
the amount paid for the neat by the b=w Mw iuoea aaaomes all fianMy for da finder diso[ibnticn of dia repM at is contents and by matai8 aaeh &sonbotion W= to hoM the
laboratory humlees against ati ehdms of pmsoos so iofotmad of do oamrm bawl
LABORATORY REPORT PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY..
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
415- 243 -2580
For Santa Clara Valley Water District
Attention Ms. Carol Presley Received 02/17/93
Address 5750 Almaden Expressway Reported 03/09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
source:
Saratoga Creek (SAR293)
Lab. No.:
DKO1615
Sample I.D.:
SAR 293D
Matrix:
Soil
Depth:
--
Date Collected:
02/16/93
Time Collected:
--
Collected by:
SCVWD
Date Extracted:
02/18/93
Date Analyzed:
02/19/93
Analytical Method:
-- _
Analysis units Analytical Results Det. Lim.
Oil & Grease (1) mg /Kg 40
25
Petroleum Hydrocargon
Fraction of Oil
and Grease (2) mg /Kg 40 25
Comments: (1) Analysis by Standard Method 5520 E. (2) Analysis by Standard
Method 5520 F. Results reported in milligrams per kilogram.
Analyst Rita Sheidgant Manager
This report applies aoty to the ssmplo investigated and is not =oUUb radiative of me quay of appa ca* identical or Similar - =Via - Mw &bffiW of the LboMUXy »)limited to
the amount paid for the rcpm by the issom Mw is assuma ail Ti&Tq far do fw&w dibutiao of this repast at its contents and by md®g such disb%ufian spoes to hold the
bbosatory hasmlus against all claims of pawns so informed of the oaotmts heroof.
Z_Q
- LABORATORY REPORT
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
674 Harrison Street
San.Francisco, CA 94107
415 - 243 -2580
For Santa Clara Valley Water District ,
Attention Ms. Carol Presley Received --
Address 5750 Almaden Expressway Reported 03/09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Quality Control Page
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Source:
Lab. No.:
Method Blank
Sample I.D.:
Standard Ottawa Sand
Matrix:
Sand
Depth:
--
Date Collected:
Time Collected:
--
Collected by:
PEL
Date Extracted:
02/18/93
Date Analyzed:
02/19/93
Analytical Method:.
-- _-
Analysis units Analytical Results Det. Lim.
Oil & Grease (1) mg /Kg <25 25
Petroleum Hydrocargon
Fraction of Oil
and Grease (2) mg /Kg <25 25
Comments: (1) Analysis by Standard Method 5520 E. (2) Analysis by Standard
Method 5520 F. Results reported in milligrams-per kilogram.
Analyst Rita Sheidgant Manager 44&6:�,
'lbii report „ppria oofy m me sampb mvatigsmed and is not naeasart7y indicativo of me 9�b' af,gip.ceatly ideatieah oc similar aampha. �o hiabtl'dy of the labasatary it iimbod to
the amount paid far the sport by the issm the issooe assumes an liability for as fiu if didnlmdm of mu mod orbs oadcab and by mating such distn'budw agora to hold the
labaatmy harmless against an claims of persons b informed of me 000teats hereof.
2/
LABORATORY REPORT PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY.
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
415- 243 -2580
For Santa Clara Valley Water District
Attention Ms. Carol Presley Received 02/17/93
Address 5750 Almaden Expressway Reported 03/09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Source:
Saratoga Creek (SAR293)
Lab. No.:
DKO1612
Sample I.D.:
SAR 293A
Matrix:
Soil
Depth:
--
Date Collected:
02/16/93
Time Collected:
--
Collected by:
SCVWD`
Date Extracted:
--
Date Analyzed:
.02/18 -19/93
EPA Analytical Method:
160.2
Analysis units Analytical Results Dot. Lim.
Moisture % 21.11 0.01
Comments: Results reported as a percent.
Analyst Rita Sheidaant Manager '
lbis rgXX1 Vpca oast to the ..mpb imeksted and is SIM MUSU'ty k icativo d the quslicy of Wm o* ida�ieal a .;ma.t .ample.. l7ro liabtlgy Lbaatay is limitee
to the amount paid for the report by the i-saw Uo iswoe assumes ari liab ft for So further dishiko im of 9& report at its cooteats and by aaakiog such dishiba im agrees to
bold the hiboratory.harsubm against all ekims of petscos so informed of the cootenri haoof.
2"L
LABORATORY REPORT
PACIFIC
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
415- 243 -2580
For Santa Clara Valley
Water District
Attention Ms. Carol Presley
Received 02/17/93
Address 5750 Almaden.Expressway
Reported 03/09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Quality Control Page
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Source:
Saratoga Creek (SAR293)
Lab. No.:
DKO1612
Sample I.D.:
SAR 293A _
Matrix:
Soil
Depth:
--
Date Collected:
02/16%93
Time Collected:
--
Collected by:
SCVWD
Date Extracted:
--
Date Analyzed:
02/18 -19/93
EPA Analytical Method:
160.2
Analysis units
Analytical Results
Replicate` Det. Lim.
Moisture %
20.70 21.52
0.01
Comments: Results reported as a percent.
Analyst Rita - Sheidgant Manager
ma ,rpod gprm a* w me ample bw=6VUed amd b not owcun* iodiut;n of do gnft of Mucatly ;doo6ed at umoplm. Tae lability of dw b 1'mkd
w me #nwua pa;d for me ap W by me;aoee The iu000 aaumw vl hd ft for ma fW dw disb&Aim of dds �t or its cmmmU gad by makme w& diem g w
bold me Lbonwry bumlea aphut ill el= of pea= so;ofamod of do omteab buoof.
LABORATORY REPORT PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY-
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
415- 243 -2580
For Santa Clara Valley Water District
Attention Ms. Carol Presley Received 02/17/93
Address 5750 Almaden Expressway Reported 03/09/93,
San Jose, CA 95118
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Source:
Saratoga Creek (SAR293)
Lab. No.:
DKO1613
Sample I.D.:
SAR 293B
Matrix:
Soil
Depth:
--
Date Collected:
02/16/93
Time Collected:
--
Collected by:
SCVWD
Date Extracted:
--
Date Analyzed:
02/18 -19/93
EPA Analytical Method:
160.2
Analysis Units Analytical Results Det. Lim
Moisture % 23.46 0.01.
Comments: Results reported as a percent.
Analyst Rita Sheidgant Manager
1Lia sepal applies.ady to do rampb mvcadgated and is sot nooaaanly indieafivo of the quality of appaso* idea" ac sim0ar aampla.lLo liability of the is fiitod
to the ==t paid far the sepal by 16e iasoee 1Le isauoo assumes all liabtldy for ma tusWa diatnbutiou of this tepoR a its 000uots and by mating nrh av= to
hold the LboMmy h=kas against aII claims of pawns w iofamed of the confmtt h=W.
--Iq
LABORATORY REPORT PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
415- 243 =2580
For Santa Clara Valley Water District
Attention Ms. Carol Presley Received 02/17/93
Address 5750 Almaden Expressway Reported 03/09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Job No. 92- 51- 5- 2008 -102
Source:
Saratoga Creek (SAR293)
Lab. No.:
DK01614
Sample I.D.:
SAR 293C
Matrix:
Soil
Depth:
--
Date Collected:
02/16/93
Time Collected:
--
Collected by:
SCVWD.
Date Extracted:
--
Date Analyzed:
02/18 -19/93
EPA Analytical Method:
160.2
Analysis units Analytical Results Det. Lim.
Moisture 25.38 0.01
Comments: Results reported as a percent.
Analyst Rita Sheidgant Manager
lbis Rpod W is only to the -Via i m:Wgdod and is nd n==* indicative of the goality of gVueatly identical or 4--*br =Wks. Ibe l kft bibotatmy is &2kd
W the s=a=t paid far tbo n*M by the isamm lbo b moe am=ts AU liability for the fmttha diatr -utim of this =pmt or ib oontrmb and by mahiog wcfrdi&1W= agma b
hold the laboratory bamileu against aU dlai=a of pmsms so =f=wd of ft com=b bum(..
z�
LABORATORY REPORT PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY'
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
415- 243 -2580
For Santa Clara Valley Water District
Attention Ms. Carol Presley Received 02/17/93
Address .5750 Almaden Expressway Reported 03/09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Source:
Lab. No..
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Saratoga Creek (SAR293)
DK01615
Sample I.D.:
SAR 293D
Matrix:
Soil
Depth:
--
Date Collected:
02/16/93
Time Collected:
--.
Collected by:
SCVWD
Date Extracted:
--
Date Analyzed:
02/18 -19/93
EPA Analytical Method:
160.2
Analysis Units Analytical Results Det. Lim.
Moisture % 25.39 0.01
Comments: Results reported as a percent.
Analyst Rita Sheidgant Manager
Tbb =pm applies only to the sampb kvuop&d and is not nmmunly indicative of the quality of apparemly Wwfi al a aim sampla. The liabMW of tho is yimited
to the amount paid for tho =pm by tho ;-soon. The 'sauce astuma ail liability for the furWtx distribution of Wit sepal a• its oaatmtt and by making such ageea to
hold the laboratory hwmbm against all claims of paw= w iofamed of the oaot eb hereof.
LABORATORY
REPORT
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
For:
Santa Clara Valley Water District-
(415)243-258o
Attention:
Ms. Carol Presley
Date Received 02/17/93
Address:
5750 Almaden Expressway
Date Reported 03/09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Source:
Saratoga Creek (SAR293)
Lab. No.:
DK01612
Sample I.D.:
SAR 293A
Matrix:
Soil
Depth:
-
Date Collected:
02/16/93
Time Collected:
-
Collected by:
SCVWD
Date Analyzed:
02/22/93
Analytical Method:.
ASTM D 422 - 63
US
SIEVE
WEIGHT
CUM. WEIGHT
WEIGHT PERCENT OF
SIEVE
OPENING
RETAINED
RETAINED
PASSING TOTAL WT.
NO.
mm
gm
gm
gm PASSING
1.5 inch
38.100
1.0 inch
25.400
3/4 inch
19.000
1/2 inch
12.700
3/8 inch
9.510
1/4 inch
6.350
4
4.760.
0.00
0.00
276.73 100.00
6
3.360
1.56
1.56
275.17 99.44
8
2.380
6.51
8.07
268.66 97.08
10
2.000
6.35
14.42
262.31 94.79
12
1.679
11.42
25.84
250.89 90.66
14
1.410
14.76
40.60
236.13 85.33
16
1.191
22.04
62.64
214.09 77.36
18
1.000
19.32
81.96
194.77 70.38
20
0.841
28.55
110.51
166.22 60.07
25
0.707
20.91
131.42
145.31 52.51
30
0.595
21.28
152.70
124.03 44.82
35
0.500
.17.56
170.26
106.47 38.47
' 40
0.420
14.97
185.23
91.50 33.06
50
0.297
29.01
214.24
62.49 22.58
60
0.250
15.57
229.81
46.92 16.96
70
0.210
10.99
240.80
35.93 12.98 .
80
0.177
10.10
250.90
25.83. 9.33
100
0.149
6.61
257.51
19.22. 6.95
140
0.105
10.36
267.87
8.86 3.20
200
0.074
4.85
272.72
4.01 1.45
230
0.063
1.52
274.24
2.49 0.90
>230
<0.063
2.49
(passed U.S. Sieve No. 230)
Total Weight
276.73 gm
Comments Reference: ASTM D 422 - 63 "Standard Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils"
Anal yst 9 Rita Sheid ant
Manager
1/
This report applies only
to the sample investigated and is not necessarily Indicative of the quality of apparently identical or similar samples. The liability
of the laboratory Is limited to the amount paid for the report by the Issues. The issues assumes all liability for the furttw distribution of this report or its
contents and by makine
such distribution agrees
to hold the laboratory harmless against all claims of persons so informed of the contents hereof.
LABORATORY
REPORT
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
674 Harrison Street
-San Francisco, CA 94107
For:
Santa Clara Valley Water District
(415) 243 -2580
Attention:
Ms. Carol Presley
Date Received
02/17/93
Address:
5750 Almaden Expressway
Date Reported
03/09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Source:
Saratoga Creek (SAR293)
Lab. No.:
DK01613
Sample I.D.:
SAR 2936
Matrix:
Soil
Depth:
--
Date Collected:
02/16193
Time Collected:
-
Collected by:
SCVWD
Date Analyzed:
02/22/93
Analytical Method:
ASTM D 422 - 63
US
SIEVE
WEIGHT
CUM. WEIGHT
WEIGHT
PERCENT OF
SIEVE
OPENING
RETAINED
RETAINED
PASSING
TOTAL WT.
NO.
mm
gm
gm
gm
PASSING
1.5 inch
38.100
_
1.0 inch
25.400
314 inch
19.000
1 /2 inch
12.700
3/8 inch
9.510
1/4 inch
6.350'
0.00
0.00
237.96-
100.00
4
4.760
0.45
0.45
237.51
99.81
6
3.360
1.20
1.65
236.31
99.31
8
2.380
1.33
2.98
234.98
98.75
10
2.000
0.86
3.84
234.12
98.39
12
1.679
1.16
5.00
232.96
97.90
14
1.410
1.79
6.79
231.17
97.15
16
1.191
3.91
10.70
227.26
95.50
18
1.000
4.78
15.48
222.48
93.49
20
0.841
10.18
25.66
212.30
89.22
25
0.707
12.31
37.97
199.99
84.04
30
0.595
20.05
58.02
179.94
75.62
35
0.500
25.94
83.96
154.00
64.72
40
0.420
32.88
116.84
121.12
50.90
50
0.297
50.61
167.45
70.51
29.63
60
0.250
21.46
188.91
49.05
20.61
70
0.210
13.60
202.51
35.45
14.90
80
0.177
10.50
213.01
24.95
10.48
100
0.149
6.69
219.70
18.26
7.67
140
0.105
9.12
228.82
9.14
3.8.4
200
0.074
4.33
233.15
4.81
2.02
230
0.063
1.50
234.65
3.31
1.39
>230
<0.063
3.31
(passed U.S. Sieve No. 230)
Total Weight
237.96 gm
Comments Reference: ASTM D 422 - 63 "Standard Method for Particle -Size Analysis of Soils ".
Analyst Rita Sheidgant Manager
This report applies only to the sample Investigated and Is not necessarily Indicative of the quality of apparently Identical or similar samples. The liability
of the laboratory Is limited to the amount paid for the repot by the Issues. The issues assumes all liability for the further distribution of this report or its
to contents and by making such distribution agrees to hold the laboratory harmless against all claims of persons so informed of the contents hereof.
LABORATORY
REPORT
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
For:
Santa Clara Valley Water District
(415) 243 -2580
Attention:
Ms. Carol Presley
Date Received
02/17193
Address:
5750 Almaden Expressway
Date Reported
03/09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Source:
Saratoga Creek (SAR293)
Lab. No.:
DK01614
Sample I.D.:
SAR 293C
Matrix:
Soil
Depth:
--
Date Collected:
02/16/93
-
Time Collected:
--
Collected by:
SCVWD
Date Analyzed:
02/22/93
Analytical Method: -
ASTM n 422 - 63
US
SIEVE
WEIGHT
CUM. WEIGHT
WEIGHT
PERCENT OF
SIEVE
OPENING
RETAINED
RETAINED
PASSING
TOTAL WT.
NO.
mm
gm
gm
gm
PASSING
1.5 inch
38.100
1.0 inch
25.400
3/4 inch
19.000
1/2 inch
12.700
3/8 inch
9.510
1/4 inch
6.350
4
4.760
0.00
0.00
350.59
100.00
6
3.360
0.61
0.61
349.98
99.83
8
2.380
0.82
1.43
349.16
99.59
10
2.000
0.33
1.76
348.83
99.50
12
1.679
0.46
2.22
348.37
99.37
14
1.410
0.60
2.82
347.77
99.20
16
1.191
1.39
4.21
346.38
98.80
18
1.000
1.69
5.90
344.69
98.32
20
0.841
4.09
9.99
340.60
97.15
25
0.707
6.45
16.44
334.15
95.31
30
0.595
13.84
30.28
320.31
91.36
35
0.500
25.07
55.35
295.24
84.21
40
0.420,
42.23
97.58
253..01
72.17
50
0.297
86.63
184.21
166.38
47.46
60
0.250
44.91
229.12
121.47
34.65
70
0.210
32.78
261.90"
88.69
25.30
80
0.177
27.63.
289.53
61.06
17.42
100
0.149
19.19
308.72
41.87
11.94
140
0.105
23.80
332.52
18.07
5.15
200
0.074
8.42
340.94
9.65
2.75
230
0.063
2.92
343.86
6.73
1.92
>230
<0.063
6.73
(passed U.S. Sieve No. 230)
Total Weight
350.59 gm
Comments Reference: ASTM D 422 - 63 "Standard Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils
".
Analyst Rita Sherd ant
Y 9
Manager
V
This report applies only to the sample Investigated and Is not necessarily Indicative of the quality of apparently identical or similar samples. The liability
of the laboratory Is limited to the amount paid for the report by the issues. The issues assumes all liability for the further distribution of this report or us
__j .... -,-S. wt. 41 .. ,., a ..asst.. hm#4 tha lahnratrvv harmlaan analnat all claims of persons so informed of the Contents hereof.
LABORATORY
REPORT
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
For:
Santa Clara Valley Water District
(415) 243 -2580
Attention:
Ms. Carol Presley
Date Received
02/17/93
Address:
5750 Almaden Expressway
Date Reported
03/09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Source:
Saratoga Creek (SAR293)
Lab. No.:
DK01615
Sample I.D.:
SAR 293D
Matrix:
Soil
Depth:
-
Date Collected:
02116/93
Time Collected:
--
Collected by:
SCVWD
Date Analyzed:
02122/93
Analytical Method:
ASTM D 422 - 63
US
SIEVE
WEIGHT
CUM. WEIGHT
WEIGHT
PERCENT OF
SIEVE
OPENING
RETAINED
RETAINED
PASSING
TOTAL WT.
NO.
mm
gm
gm
gm
PASSING
1.5 inch
38.100
1.0 inch
25.400
3/4 inch
19.000
1/2 inch
12.700
0.00
0.00
335.37
100.00
3/8 inch
9.510
1.98
1.98
333.39
99.41
1 /4 inch
6.350
0.00
1.98
333.39
99.41
4
4.760
0.60
2.58
332.79
99.23
6
3.360
0.39
2.97
332.40
99.11
8
2.380
1.46
4.43
330.94
98.68
10
2.000
1.20
5.63
329.74
98.32
12
1.679
1.37
7.00
328.37
97.91
14
1.410
1.50
8.50
326.87
97.47
16
1.191
2.40
10.90
324.47
96.75
18
1.000
2.10
13.00
322.37
96.12
20
0.841
3.54
16.54
318.83
95.07
25
0.707
3.66
20.20
315.17
93.98
30
0.595
5.21
25.41
309.96
92.42
35
0.500
8.46
33.87
301.50
89.90
40
0.420
18.63
52.50
282.87
84.35
50
0.297
55.89
108.39
226.98
67.68
60
0.250
46.69
155.08
180.29
53.76
70
0.210
46.04
201.12
134.25
40.03
80
0.177
44.39
245.51
89.86
26.79
100
0.149
30.48
275.99
59.38
17.71
140
0.105
36.28
312.27
23.10
6.89
200
0.074
12.43
324.70
10.67
3.18
230
0.063
3.87
328.57
6.80
2.03
>230
<0.063
6.80
(passed U.S. Sieve No. 230)
Total Weight
335.37 gm
Comments Reference: ASTM D 422 - 63 'Standard Method for Particle -Size / nalysis of Soils'.
Analyst Rita Sheidgant Manager
This report applies only to the sample Investigated and is not necessarily Indicative of the quality of apparently Identical or similar samples a liability
of the laboratory Is limited to the amount paid for the report by the Issues. The issues assumes all liability for the further distribution of this report or Its
^1A «.,:,t. e.,,4 h...., W- --h Aiewhit"nn nnrwwa to held the laboratory harmless against all claims of persons so informed of the contents hereof.
Is LABORATORY REPORT PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
415- 243 -2580
For Santa Clara Valley Water District
Attention Ms. Carol Presley Received 02/17/93
Address 5750 Almaden Expressway Reported 03/09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Source:
Lab No.:
Sample I.D.:
Matrix:
Depth:
Date Collected:
Time Collected:
Collected by:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
EPA Method:
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Saratoga Creek (SAR293)
DKO1612
SAR 293A
Soil
02/16/93
SCVWD
02/24- 03/02/93
Analysis Units Analytical Results Det.Lim.
Aluminum (A1)(1)
mg /Kg
9400
50
Antimony (Sb)(1)
mg /Kg
<5
5
Arsenic (As)(2)
mg /Kg
3.1
0.3
Barium (Ba)(1)
mg /Kg
70
0.2
Beryllium (Be)(1)
mg /Kg
0.7
0.2
Boron (B)(1)
mg /Kg
<2
2
Cadmium (Cd)(1)
mg /Kg
<0.2
0.2
Calcium (Ca)(1)
mg /Kg
4100
20
T. Chromium(Cr)(1)
mg /Kg
27
0.5
Cobalt (Co)(1)
mg /Kg
7
1
Copper (Cu)(1)
mg /Kg
24
0.6
Iron (Fe)(1)
mg /Kg
19000
60
Lead (Pb)(1)
mg /Kg
12
2
Magnesium (Mg)
mg /Kg
6700
10
Manganese (Mn)
mg /Kg
300
0.5
Mercury (Hg)(3)
mg /Kg
<0.05
0.05
Molybdenum (Mo)(1)
mg /Kg
<1
1
Nickel (Ni)(1)
mg /Kg
31
1
Potassium (K)(1)
mg /Kg
360
50
Selenium (Se)(2)
mg /Kg
<0.3
0.3
Silver (Ag) (1)
mg /Kg
<1
1
Sodium (Na)(1)
mg /Kg
88
50
Thallium (Tl)(2)
mg /Kg
<0.3
0.3
Vanadium (V)(1)
mg /Kg
25
0.5
Zinc (Zn)(1)
mg /Kg
47
2
Comments: (1) Analysis by inductively, coupled argon plasma emission
spectroscopy. (2) Analysis by atomic absorption spectrophotometry.
(3) Analysis by cold -vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Results
reported in milligrams per kilogram, wet (as received) weight basis.
Analyst K.-Noyes, P. DeMarois_ Manager
This =pod appliu only to &a umpla mvatigated and is ant ===ft iodicati" of ft V=W of appuo* identical mar umpla The liabMV of F6ehb..ty is %itW W
the ammmt paid for the repmt by the im= The istatoa assnmoa aII liability for do further d6ftBufim of this apa or its oontmts and by making such &xUludm &am W had the c
W.
LABORATORY REPORT PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY'
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
415- 243 -2580
For Santa Clara Valley Water District
Attention Ms. Carol Presley Received 02/17/93
Address 5750 Almaden Expressway Reported 03/09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Source: Saratoga Creek (SAR293)
Lab No.: DKO1613
Sample-I.D.: SAR 293B
M trix• Soil
a
Depth:
Date Collected:
Time Collected:
Collected by:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
EPA Method:
02/16/93
SCVWD
02/24- 03/02/93
Analysis Units Analytical Results Det.Lim.
Aluminum (A1)(1).
mg /Kg
9800
50
Antimony (Sb)(1)
mg /Kg
<5
5
Arsenic (As)(2)
mg /Kg
3.6
0.3
Barium (Ba)(1)
mg /Kg
73
0.2
Beryllium - (Be)(1)
mg /Kg
0.7
0.2
Boron (B)(1)
mg /Kg
<2
2
Cadmium (Cd)(1)
mg /Kg
<0.2
0.2
Calcium (Ca)(1)
mg /Kg
4400
20
T. Chromium(Cr)(1)
mg /Kg
25
0.5
Cobalt (Co)(1)
mg /Kg
8
1
Copper (Cu)(1)
mg /Kg
25
0.6
Iron (Fe)(1)
mg /Kg
20000
60
Lead (Pb)(1)
mg /Kg.
12
2_
Magnesium (Mg)
mg /Kg
6400
10
Manganese (Mn)
mg /Kg
320
0.5
Mercury (Hg)(3)
mg /Kg.
<0.05
0.05
Molybdenum (Mo)(1)
mg /Kg
<1
1
Nickel (Ni) (1)
mg /Kg
31
1.
Potassium (K)(1)
mg /Kg
420
50
Selenium (Se)(2)
mg /Kg
<0.3
0.3
Silver (Ag)(1)
mg /Kg
<1
1
Sodium (Na)(1)
mg /Kg
95
50
Thallium (Tl)(2)
mg /Kg
<0.3
0.3
Vanadium (V)(1)
mg /Kg
26
0.5
Zinc (Zn) (1)
mg /Kg
47
2
Comments: (1) Analysis by inductively coupled argon plasma emission
spectroscopy. (2) Analysis by-atomic absorption spectrophotometry.
(3) Analysis by cold -vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Results
reported in milligrams per kilogram, wet (as receiv d) weight basis.
I
Analyst K. Noyes, P. DeMardis_ Manager
ThU report Inaea o* to the .ample kves i mad aad is not ae=n* iodiat w of rho qu k of vp no* wwbw at unuar ample.. Tho b&Hq of ft4hastm is l MWA to
the amamt paid for the report by the iesuee. The issuee assamea aD.%hHitr far -the fadher_diaoiibution of thin report or ita ooateota_ and by marine such dietttbuhon aaroea w hold the
LABORATORY REPORT PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
415- 243 -2580
For Santa Clara Valley Water District
Attention Ms. Carol Presley Received 02/17/93
Address 5750 Almaden Expressway Reported 03/09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Source:
Lab No.:
Sample I.D..
Matrix:
Depth:
Date Collected:
Time Collected:
Collected by:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
EPA Method:
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Saratoga Creek (SAR293),
DKO1614
SAR 293C
Soil
02/16/93
SCVWD
02/24- 03/02/93
Analysis Units Analytical Results Det.Lim.
`Aluminum (Al)(1)
mg/Kg
7800
50
Antimony (Sb)(1)
mg /Kg
<5
5
Arsenic (As)(2)
mg /Kg
2.7
0.3
Barium (Ba)(1)
mg /Kg
74
0.2
�ryllium (Be)(1)
B/�
mg /Kg
0.6
0.2
(Boron (B)(1)
mg /Kg
<2
2
Ca�dmium (Cd)(1)
mg /Kg
<0.2
0.2
Calcium (Ca)(1)
mg /Kg
4100
20
T. Chromium(Cr)(1)
mg /Kq
22
0.5
Cobalt (Co)(1)
mg /Kg
7
1
C pper (Cu)(1)
mg /Kg
23
0.6
✓Iron (Fe) (1)
mg /Kg
15000
60
Lead (Pb)(1)
mg /Kg
12
2
Magnesium (Mg)
mg /Kg
5800
10
!Manganese (Mn)
mg /Kg
270
0.5
Mercury (Hg)(3)
mg /Kg
<0.05
0.05
Molybdenum (Mo)(1)
mg /Kg
<1
1
Nick21 (Ni)(1)
mg /Kg
29
1.
L4:rotassium (K)(1)
mg /Kg
390
50
Selenium (Se)(2)
mg /Kg
<0.3
0.3
Silver (Ag)(1)
mg /Kg
<1
1
4odium (Na)(1)
mg /Kg
71
50
Thallium (Tl)(2.)
mg /Kg
<0.3
0.3
Vanadium (V)(1)
mg /Kg
23
0.5
Zinc (Zn)(1)
mg /Kg
43
2
Comments: (1) Analysis by inductively. coupled argon plasma emission
spectroscopy. (2) Analysis by atomic absorption spectrophotometry.
(3) Analysis by cold-vapor_ atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Results
reported in milligrams per kilogram, wet (as recei d) weight basis
Analyst K. Noyes, P. DeMarois Manager
M& rgpmt applia a* to dm um* kvcsOp ad and is nat w= u * indieatim of dm quality of VP�b' ' eal ar similar umpla. Tha liabi7uy d►a labonuoq is limited to
the amount paid for the . qxx by the im". The bffum asmmes 0 5abdity for fw*cr disb%utim of &is.=pod crib oantmfi and by making such distnbvtion agtea to MW &a � /
LABORATORY REPORT PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY'
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
415- 243 -2580
For Santa Clara Valley Water District
Attention Ms. Carol Presley Received 02/17/93
Address 5750 Almaden Expressway Reported 03/09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Source:
Saratoga Creek (SAR293)
Lab No.:
DK01615
Sample I.D.:
SAR 293D
Matrix:
Soil
Depth:
--
Date Collected:
02/16/93 ,
Time Collected:
--
Collected by:
SCVWD
Date Extracted:
--
Date Analyzed:
02/24- 03/02/93
EPA Method:
--
Analysis Units Analytical Results Det.Lim.
Aluminum (Al) (1)
mg /Kg
7200
50
Antimony,(Sb)(1)
mg /Kg
<5
5,
Arsenic (As)(2)
mg /Kg
2.5
0.3
Barium (Ba) (1)
mg! Kg
65
0.2
Beryllium (Be)(1)
mg /Kg
0.5
0.2
Boron (B)(1)
mg /Kg
<2
2
Cadmium (Cd)(1)
mg /Kg
<0.2
0.2
Calcium (Ca)(1)
mg/Kg
3300
20
T. Chromium(Cr)(1)
mg/Kg
20
0.5
Cobalt (Co)(1)
mg/Kg
7
1
Copper (Cu)(1)
mg /Kg
19
0.6
Iron (Fe)(1)
mg /Kg
14000
60
Lead (Pb)(1)
mg/Kg
12
2.
Magnesium (Mg)
mg /Kg
4800
10
Manganese (Mn)
mg/Kg
230
0.5
Mercury (Hg)(3)
mg /Kg
<0.05
0.05
Molybdenum (Mo)(1)
mg /Kq
<1
1
Nickel (Ni)(1)
mg /R3
25
1.
Potassium (R)(1)
mg /Kg
350
50
Selenium (Se)(2)
mg /Kg
<0.3
0.3
Silver (Ag)(1)
mg /Kg
<1
1
Sodium (Na)(1)
mg /Rg
64
50
Thallium (Tl)(2)
mg /Kg
<0.3
0.3
Vanadium (V)(1)
mg /Kg
20
0.5
Zinc (Zn)(1)
mg /Kg
38
2
Comments: (1) Analysis by inductively coupled argon plasma emission
spectroscopy. (2) Analysis by atomic absorption spectrophotometry.
(3) Analysis by cold -vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Results
reported in milligrams per kilogram, wet (as received) weight basis.
Analyst K. Noyes, P. DeMarois Manager A4^1L4-4-
This report applies only to the sample i rveo Rated and is na namsai* iodtmative of rho qua ty of appara* J.14 amples. Tho babMW f laboratory is r®imd to
2' the amount paid for the report by the issuee. Zbe isaoee assumes aII rmb0ity for.tho further dirtnbation. of this report or its contents and by mskiog sash ' agtees to Laid the
LABORATORY REPORT PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
674 Harrison Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
415- 243 -2580
For Santa Clara Valley Water District
Attention Ms. Carol Presley Received --
Address 5750 Almaden Expressway Reported 03/09/93
San Jose, CA 95118
Quality Control Page
Job No. 92 -51 -5- 2008 -102
Source:
Lab No..
Sample I.D.;
Matrix:
Depth:
Date Collected:
Time Collected:.
Collected by:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
EPA Method:
Method Blank
Standard Ottawa Sand
Sand
PEL
02/24- 03/02/93
Analysis Units' Analytical Results bet.Lim.
Aluminum (Al) (1)
mg /Kg
<50
50
Antimony (Sb)(1)
mg /Kg
<5
5
Arsenic (As)(2)
mg /Kg
<0.3
0.3
0.2
Barium (Ba)(1)
mg /Kg
<0.2
0.2
Beryllium (Be)(1)
mg /Kg
<0.2
Boron (B)(1)
mg /Kg
<2
2
0.2
Cadmium (Cd)(1)
mg /Kg
<0.2
Calcium (Ca)(1)
mg /Kg
<20
20
T. Chromium(Cr)(1)
mg /Kg
<0.5
0.5
Cobalt (Co)(1)
mg /Kg
<1
1
Copper (Cu)(1)
mg /Kg
<0.6
0.6
Iron (Fe)(1)
mg /Kg
<60
60
Lead (Pb)(1)
mg /Kg
<2
2
Magnesium (Mg)
mg /Kg
<10
10
0.5
Manganese (Mn)
mg /Kg
.<0.5
0.05
Mercury (Hg)(3)
mg /Kg
<0.05
Molybdenum (Mo)(1)
mg /Kg
<1
1
Nickel (Ni)(1)
mg /Kg
<1
1
Potassium (K)(1)
mg /Kg
<50
50
Selenium (Se)(2)
mg /Kg
<0.3
0.3
Silver (Ag)(1)
mg /Kg
<1
1
Sodium (Na)(1)
mg /Kg
<50
50
Thallium (Tl)(2)
mg /Kg
<0.3
0.3
Vanadium (V)(1)
mg /Kg
<0.5
0.5
Zinc (Zn)(1)
mg /Kg
<2
2
Comments: (1) Analysis by inductively. coupled argon plasma emission
spectroscopy. (2) Analysis by atomic absorption spectrophotometry.
(3) Analysis by cold -vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Results
reported in milligrams per .kilogram, wet (as received) weight basis
Analyst K Noyes P. DeMarois Manager IAAlil
This report applies only to the sample investigated and is not mceuffny indicative of the quality of nppac -00y idmtieal of les. Mw liability of is limited to
the amount Paid for the report by the issuce. The issued assumes all liability for the f niher distribution of this report or its contents and by making such distribution agrees to hold the
W
s
Site Name: Sa �� 09 `� <� re e le-
Incident ID #: S k 2- 9.3
Scope Number: -5-- Z cog � �� Z
,V K r
I CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LABORATORY: I�ir _ C_
Sampled by (Print): Da f C-0 S
Requested By:
Site Location:
Vof%
Santa Clara Valley Water District
5750 Almaden Expressway
San Jose, CA 95118
(408) 265 -2600
FC 1019 (0743.90)
MATRIX ABBREVIATION - Soil = S; Water = W; Product = P
fit Li�/�MIAIII nh^ff � 1wn #,1 n r�^^Inf nnri rnfrrrn n i�nnv n/ fhla /Arm W1fh 1AhnrAfr)ry rPS111 /4_
nquished By (Signatures) /Affiliation:
9
g
_
1--
Analyses v
Jt
Requested tX h P ti� 0 ` a�
�o'
Q�L 4) t1 11 REMARKS
Sa le
a�QP
Date
Sampled
Time
-Sampled
Matrix
243A
h 9
Ss:
l
AL r
by1
(01
X •
Y\
PI&
2938
..
D
Ib1 _
X'
?C'
x '
X,
55:2 F
293c
Af
, j<,
X
X ,
)C •
/C
5�2c1 F
MATRIX ABBREVIATION - Soil = S; Water = W; Product = P
fit Li�/�MIAIII nh^ff � 1wn #,1 n r�^^Inf nnri rnfrrrn n i�nnv n/ fhla /Arm W1fh 1AhnrAfr)ry rPS111 /4_
nquished By (Signatures) /Affiliation:
Received By (Signatures) /Affiliation:
Date
Time
Sr
fit.. /L
�C7
D
Dlslrbitlon: Original - RETURN TO DISTRICT WITH RESULTS, Pink - laboratory, Yellowi-bistrict
Page 0f
koGorovdeyWcAwD 4rktO REQUEST FOR LABORATORY SERVICES..
FC 1071 (01.08 -90; "
DO NOT WRITE IN SHADED AREAS — ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE DIVISION USE ONLY
SAMPLED BY
SAMPLE PICK UP (Coordinate with sampler Identified at left.)
Requested by:
me: / S/
A
Date: � J, 1 9 3
Date Request: 2 3
a ►� eW5
-- -
S�eL c-- �fn4f
Asr�f D 9z L
I
rnpany: S C D
Approximate Time: M
Division: G
)no No.:
Address (attach map): {
Charge Number:
C--1-
Jact Description: !a r,cL �0 � a Gr c k I c 0. su re p o ,r � � -�- �-t h �.c w� b �r 5
Number
of
Samples
Matrix
TurTime nd
Analyses Requested
Remarks
5520 %
n/
1YICr S �u re,
-- -
S�eL c-- �fn4f
Asr�f D 9z L
T.
2 M c 61
�
roo";
G r b v„
a
UNIT COST PER ANALYSIS (S)
0
% v
8 S
45
TOTAL COST PER ANALYSIS ($)
ap
So .
400
l .
�g o
TOTAL JOB COST (S) 2, O % Z
irict Engineer, Approval: 41, —�� SCVWD Job Number:
cZ� -�'Ll Date: 2/� /93 y2 - S/ - 5 Zoo P� - % °Z
ribution: White— Laboratory Yellow — Environmental Compliance Division Pink— Requestor
k-0
r*o oo(a valey Wat« DbW O
4
REQUEST FOR LABORATORY SERVICES.
FC 1071 (01 -06-�
nn unT WDITC IN cuent~n An;:AQ- ..FNVInnNMFNTAL COMPLIANCE DIVISION USE ONLY
SAMPLED BY
SAMPLE PICK UP (Coordinate wlth sampler Identlned at left.)
Requested by:
ame:
v�
Date:
Date of Request:
ompany: ^
.]J
Approximate Time:
Division:
hone No.:
Address (attach map):
Charge Number: 2 I� Sid P,
folect Description: C/ +k r
Number
of
Samples
Matrix
Turnaround
Time
Analyses Requested
Remarks
n
�,�' f 'J5
5
V
✓
UNIT COST PER ANALYSIS
TOTAL COST PER ANALYSIS ($)
(?
`g b
l
TOTAL JOB COST ($) /S9 Z
I
SCVWD Job Number:
ffstrid Engineer App l� �� G'2 — _S�_ --S�"'
Date:
siribution: White -- Laboratory Yellow- Environnw4tal Compliance Division Pink- Requestor
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO. Z 3 AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: May 5, 1993, CITY MGR. APA&4��'L
.ORIGINATING DEPT. FINANCE DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: STATE MANDATED COST CLAIMING
Recommended Motion(s): Authorize the City. Manager to execute- a
Contract for Claim. Filing_ Services with David M. Griffith and
Associates., Ltd.. at a Fixed Fee of $6,500.
ReRort Summary: DMG is prepared to offer the City their expert
assistance in filing its State Mandated Cost Claims under _a "tight"
timeline (,May _15th). DMG has specialized in the state .mandated
cost area for nearly ten years. DMG is. utilized by over 120 cities
for state mandated cost claiming services each year. DMG is strong
in the preparation of .separate Indirect Cost Rate Proposals(ICRPs)
to apply to the personnel costs in each department involved with
state mandated cost activities. By relying on the expertise of
this firm, we can most likely maximize the reimbursement of state
mandated costs at no ultimate cost to the City, since the costs of
the attached contract are also reimbursable under SB 90. DMG's
Consultant has estimated eligible costs of approximately $25,000
for Open Meetings -Act and Monthly Investment Reports.
Fiscal Impacts: An intial contract fee of $6,500 will be required.
This cost is reimbursable under SB 90, resulting in no cost to the
City. Funds are currently available as cost savings in. Central
Services - Contracts.
Follow Up Actions: Mail a copy of the signed Contract. for Claim
Filing Services. to David M. Griffith and Associates, Ltd., 5715
Marconi. Ave., Suite A, Carmichael, CA 95608.` Proceed with cost
review with the DMG's Consultant to isolate costs to be claimed.
Consequences of Not Acting on the Recommended Motions: The Finance
Department has inadequate resources to gather the information
required to file the cost claims.by the deadline. The City would
forfeit the revenue opportunity of ' the filing of the SB 90 Mandated
Cost Claims for Open Meetings Act and Monthly Investment Reports.
F : \WPFILES \EX50'593.SUM
SARATOGGA CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO. 2 3Oa AGENDA ITEM:
MEETING DATE: May 5, 1993
ORIGINATING DEPT.: Planninq CITY MGR. APPROVAL
SUBJECT: St. Archangel Michael Church - Parking Lot Lighting
Response to Oral Communication of April 7, 1993
Recommended Motion:
Receive and file letter to Reverend Fr. Rade Stokich.
Report Summary:
The City Council has received complaints regarding the use of parking .
lot lights at the church located at 18870 Allendale Avenue. The
Planning Director met with Father Stokich to discuss the use of the
lights and the appropriate process to request their retention. The
attached letter was sent to Father Stokich summarizing our conversation.
Staff feels these agreed -to conditions are reasonable. The primary
objective of not using the lights will be adhered to while the
application process allows the church to request an overall review of
lighting needs for the property.
Fiscal Impacts:
None
Follow Up Actions:
Staff will monitor application process. If application is not submitted
by June 28, 1993, staff will direct light standards to be removed.
Consequences of Not Acting on the Recommended Motions:
If City Council feels that the light standards should be removed
immediately and not' considered as part of a new church application
request, staff will direct church to remove standards.
1
(_7�Mlgw ®q 0&MZ19QX5&
13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE • SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 • (408) 867 -3438
April 28, 1993
Reverend Fr. Rade Stokich
St. Archangel Michael Church
18870 Allendale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 95070
Re: Parking Lot Lighting
Dear Father Stokich:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Karen Anderson
Ann Marie Burger
Willem Kohler
Victor Monia
Karen Tucker
This is to follow up our meeting of April 27, 1993, regarding the
church parking lot lighting. As we discussed, City files do not
indicate approval of the location or height of the light standards
used to illuminate the parking lot. Therefore, the lights must not
be used and the light standards must be removed.
As we discussed, you have the right to request approval of the
lighting by the Planning Commission as part of an application
process. You indicated that the Church Board is finalizing plans
for submittal to the Planning Commission for the construction of a
new church facility. It is anticipated that these plans will be
submitted to the City within the next sixty days.
We agreed to the following:
• The lights will not be turned on for any purpose until
approval by the City or part of a formal review process.
• The light standards can remain provided they are included with
the new application that will be submitted to the City within
the next sixty days.
• If the new application is not submitted within sixty days
(that is, by June 28, 1993), the light standards must be
removed.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not
hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
PAUL L. URTIS
Planning Director
PLC:cw
Printed on recycled paper.
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO. 2 '30'7 AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: May 5, 1993 CITY MGR. APPROVAL
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Manager6eie
SUBJECT: Access Restriction on Bohlman Road and Parker Ranch Area
on July 4th
Recommended Motion:
1. Authorize two sheriff's reserve units to establish a
checkpoint at the beginning of Bohlman Road to restrict access
on July 4th from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. as requested by
Saratoga Fire Chief Kraule.
2. Authorize staff to grant permission through the Special Event
Permit process to restrict access to roads in Parker ,Ranch
area on July 4th from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. as requested by
the Parker Ranch Homeowners Association.
Report Summary:
In the past Council has taken action to restrict access of
outsiders wishing to view fireworks on July 4th in certain hillside
areas of Saratoga which are in the hazardous fire areas and have
very limited access. In both the Bohlman Road and Parker Ranch
areas reserve deputies will be limiting access to residents and
guests of residents by establishing checkpoints, rather than
actually closing roads.
In the past, the City has covered the cost of assigning two reserve
units to Bohlman Road. The Parker Ranch Homeowners Association
will coordinate the activities through their protective services
management, and will assume all costs for the operation. Because
of the nature of this activity, I am recommending waiver of the
requirement for a filing fee, clean -up deposit, and extra liability
insurance for issuance of a. Special Events Permit for the Parker
Ranch HOA.
The two fire districts in Saratoga and the Sheriff's Office have
approved the proposed plans.
Fiscal Impacts:
Approximately $190 for two reserve units at Bohlman Road.
Attachments:
Correspondence between Assistant
Director of Protective Services,
Motion and Vote:
to City Manager and Robert Bruno,
Parker Ranch HOA.
• 90 W.
PARKER RANCH PROTECTIVE SERVICES -- - - - -Main A -venue
--
A Division of Investigative & Protective Services • Morgan Hill, CA 95037
i • 408 - 778 -7988
A California Corporation • 408- 295 -9044
(Emergency Phone)
April 8, 1993
Ms. Carolyn King
Assistant to City Manager APR 1 2 1993
City of Saratoga
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 95070
RE: ROAD CLOSURES FOR JULY 4 1993 - PARKER RANCH COMMUNITY
Dear Ms. King:
As per our telephone conversation today, we are providing to you this
letter in reference to the Forth of July road closure at Parker Ranch.
Last year, the City of Saratoga granted permission to the Parker Ranch
Homeowners Association to utilize the Sheriff's Office for assistance
in securing the Parker Ranch Community on the evening of the fourth of
July with the use of paid Reserve Deputies.
On July 4, 1992, this operation commenced for 4 1/2 hours with complete
success in cooperation with the neighbors and those not part of the
Parker Ranch Community. The response of the public was positive and
very accepting.
The following is to confirm the actions to take place on July 4, 1993:
1. Three (3) Reserve Deputies with patrol cars are to meet with Parker
Ranch Protective Services Personnel at Parker Ranch Road and
Burnett Court at 6:45 p.m.
2. The Reserve Deputies will be briefed on the details of the
operation and will be given a typed list of the residents and
guests of Parker Ranch.
3. Deputies will be posted at:
Parker Ranch Road @ Burnett Court
Parker Ranch Road @ Parker Ranch Court
Comer Drive @ Arroyo De Arguello
Ucensed by the State of CalMomla, Department of Consumer Affairs
State Licenses AA12749 • PA010101
I
4. This operation will terminate at 11:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter.
The senior Reserve Deputy in charge of this operation will
determine if it will be necessary to continue past the cut -off
time.
The Parker Ranch Homeowners Association will be paying the Santa Clara
County Sheriffs Office for the use of the reserve deputies and the
Sheriff Department's patrol vehicles.
The City of Saratoga will assume no costs for this operation.
In light of the aftermath of the Oakland Hills fire of October 1991 and
our own past experiences with roadway blockages caused by hundreds of
automobiles blocking roadway access to the Parker Ranch community , we
know that this preventive measure will provide the highest degree of
public safety to all concerned.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to
call our office anytime.
Very truly yours,
C�!
Robert A. Bruno
Director of Protective Services
Parker Ranch Homeowners Association
RAB /twr
cc: Parker Ranch H.O.A.
Paul Robles
page 2
y
r�
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO. 2 3 ro AGENDA ITEM q�
MEETING DATE: May 5, 1993 CITY MGR. APPROVAL
ORIGINATING DEPT: City Manager's Office C�
SUBJECT: Foothill Club's Memorial Day Ceremony
Recommended Motion:
Approve the ceremony as proposed on May 31, 1993, authorizing
assistance from the Sheriff's Department as needed.
Report Summary:
The Foothill Club is proposing to hold their annual Memorial Day
Ceremony, which they have done since 1922, on May 31, 1993.
Because the Foothill Club does not have the budget to support the
costs associated with the City's Special Events Permit (i.e.
insurance, police costs, deposits, etc.), staff has not viewed this
activity as a Special Event in the past. Instead, the event has
been viewed as a walk not requiring any street closure or other
modification of traffic. Lieutenant Huber of the Westside
Sheriff's Station believes that his office can provide whatever
assistance in street crossing may be necessary at no cost.
Fiscal Impacts:
None
Attachments:
Letter dated April 23, 1993, . from Louise G. Cooper, Saratoga
Foothill Club.
Motion and Vote:
-Ii.
�
`
`
P.O. BOX 2233
SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070
April 23, 199---,
Members, Saratoga City Council
13777 Fruitvale Ave.
Saratoga, CA 95070
Friends:
o
/` k~
As we have for over sixty years, the Saratoga Foothill
Club is again coordinating the Saratoga Memorial Day Service
with theparticipation of as many local active and retired
military personnel and youth groups as possible.
We request your permission to hold this annual ceremony
on Monday, May 31, beginning with the prOgram at the
Memorial Arch at 9:30 AM, followed by the walk up Oak Street
to Madronia Cemetery for Services at 10:00 AM.
We particularly invite council members to attend as
this is one of the most moving public ceremonies held in
Saratoga' Traditionally the Mayor of the City has given a
brief welcome at the service and introduced any other
Council members who are present. We have extended our
invitation to Mayor Anderson to participate.
In addition to this permission, we request the City of
Saratoga to provide the services of a Deputy Sheriff or
Community Service Officer at Highway (Saratoga-Los Gatos
Road) and Oak Street from 9:00 AM until 10:00 AM toensure
that the group can proceed safely from Blaney Plaza to the
cemetery'
If you will place this request on the next council
meeting agenda, a representative of our committee will be
present to answer any questions.
Thank you for consideration of this request.
r
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO. z3/ AGENDA ITEM
MEETING DATE: May 5, 1993 CITY MGR.
ORIGINATING DEPT. Engineering
SUBJECT: Status Report on Leonard Rd. Assessment District
Recommended Motion(s): None at this time.
Report Summary: See attached.
Fiscal Impacts: None at this time. Future impacts are unknown.
Follow Up Actions: 1. Pursue debt financing alternatives.
2. Determine proper method to develop improvement plans.
3. City Attorney to evaluate City's liability exposure.
Consequences of Not Acting on the Recommended Motions: N /A.
0: \exec.sum (rev.2 -3 -93)
ti
U
v�
(1'1D**MUW @2 0&MZ1YQ)(5Z&.
13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE • SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 • (408) 867 -3438
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Karen Anderson
Ann Marie Burger
Willem Kohler
Victor Monia
Karen Tucker
Summary: On Wednesday evening, staff held a meeting with the
Leonard Rd. property owners to review alternatives for improving
the road to City street standards via an assessment district
process. At the conclusion of the meeting, there appeared to be
unanimous consensus on the following:
1. The only portion of Leonard Rd. which has been accepted by the
City into the publicly maintained street-system is the 30 foot
half street improved in 1965 as a condition of Tract No. 4062
(Cirigliano).
2. The 30 foot half street improved in 1972 as a condition of SDR
No. 1310 (Serrierre) was offered to the City as a public street on
the Parcel Map for SDR No. 1310 but has never been accepted by the
City although the required improvements were completed.
3. Leonard Rd. should be improved to a standard which would allow
it to become a public street while not detracting from the
somewhat rural character of the road.
4. The costs to improve Leonard Rd. to a standard which would
allow it to become a public street should be borne by the 13
property owners who are not a part of either Tract No. 4062 or SDR
No. 1310.
5. The City should facilitate the improvements to Leonard Rd. via
an assessment district process.
6. The City should pursue every available option for cost
effective debt financing of the improvements including the
possibility of the City loaning the necessary funds to the
assessment district to accomplish the project.
7. If there is no cost effective option for debt financing of the
improvements, then the 13 property owners would need to agree to
pay for the entire project up front at an estimated cost of
between $ 6,000 and $ 8,000 per property owner.
8. Plans for the improvements should be prepared so that firm
construction bids could be secured from contractors.
9. The City should ascertain its liability for accidents and /or
injuries incurred on the road as a result of drainage from the
public portion of the road contributing to its deterioration and
causing a hazard.
y/
At this point, there appears to be enough genuine interest in
improving the road to keep the process moving forward even if debt
financing cannot be.arr.anged. On the other hand, the property
owners want a firm cost for the improvements before.commiting to
pay for them up front. In order to obtain a firm cost, plans
would need to be prepared and bids solicited from contractors.
This in itself would cost about $ 5,000 in survey costs and staff
time and I'm not certain whether the City could even commit to
these'expenditures without some form of guaranteed payback. I
will attempt to research this and have an answer by your meeting.
Also, I will ask the City Attorney to review the liability issue
raised by the property owners as this might justify a certain
level of City involvement at this time.
I
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL \
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO. 2—S12- AGENDA ITEM J /rl-
MEETING DATE: May 5, 1993 CITY MGR. IW'4�
ORIGINATING DEPT. Engineering
SUBJECT: Status Report on Hakone Garden Water System
Capital Project 981
Recommended Motion(s): None at this time.
Report Summary: Engineering staff is prepared to re -bid the Hakone
Garden water system. The new schedule for the project is as
follows: Advertise bids, May 11; Open bids, June 8; Award
contract, June 16; Begin construction, July 1; End construction,
November 1. Per an understanding reached with the. Hakone
Foundation, the construction contract will prohibit the contractor
from working in the Garden on Fridays during the summer rental
season. This will prolong the installation of the water system,
but will ensure that there will be no complications with anyone
renting the Garden facilities.
Fiscal Impacts: Unknown until bids are opened.
Follow Up Actions: None at this time.
Consequences of Not Acting on the Recommended Motions: N /A.
O: \exec.sum (rev.2 -3 -93)