The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07-06-1994 CITY COUNCIL AGENDASARoA'TOGA CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO. AGENDA ITEM MEETING DATE: July 6, 1994 CITY MGR. APPROVAL ORIGINATING DEPT: City Manager's ---------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT: An Ordinance of the City of Saratoga Amending Section 3- 05.010 of the Saratoga City Code, Relating to Misdemeanor and Infraction Violations of the Code ------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Recommended Motion: Introduce Ordinance No. 71- waiving reading in full. Report Summary: This ordinance, recommended by the City Attorney, would allow for criminal enforcement of Emergency Nuisance Abatement actions by adding reference to Article 3 -20 to Section 3- 05.010 of the Code which deals with criminal enforcement of the City Code. The effect of the ordinance would be to allow the City to enforce emergency nuisance abatement cases through criminal complaint as well as civil and administrative proceedings. Fiscal Impacts• Minor. Such cases are rare but criminal prosecution usually costs more than civil enforcement because of the degree of burden of proof. Advertising, Noticing and Public Contact: Consequences of Not Acting on the Recommended Motions: Emergency nuisance abatement cases will continue to be handled as at present. Follow Up Actions: Place on July 20, 1994, agenda for second reading and adoption. Attachments: Draft Ordinance 0 S SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO. �V,3 AGENDA ITEM MEETING DATE: 7/6/94 CITY MGR.. �O 1ACdf±4 ORIGINATING DEPT. City Manager SUBJECT: Personnel Actions for Fiscal Year 1994/95 Recommended Motions 1. Adopt Resolution No. 85 -9. Setting Management Salary Ranges for fiscal year 94/95 2. Approve Change in Salary Range from Range 89 to Range 94 for Public Services Assistant Position Report Summary : The Resolution setting management salary ranges is based on an annual job market survey and the guidelines set forth in the revised management compensation system which Council adopted in 1993. As in previous years, adjustment to the ranges does not result in any automatic movement of employees. The proposed 5% increase for the salary range for the Public Services Assistant position is based on significant increases in the complexity of the job duties and program responsibilities since the position was created last year. Fiscal Impacts• Salary costs are included in the approved 94/95 budget. Advertising, Noticing and Public Contact: None Consequences. of Not Acting on the Recommended Motions: Changes will not be made. Follow up Actions: Staff will implement changes. Attachments: Resolution No 85 -9. Staff Report from Assistant to City Manager and Revised Salary Schedule for Non - Management Employees 4 r �I Y.Ar TV 1710GM, 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE • SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 • (408) 867 -3438 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Karen Anderson Ann Marie Burger April 25, 1994 willemKohler Victor Monia Karen Tucker To: City Manager From: Assistant to the City Manager Subject: Proposed Change of Salary Range I- have incorporated a salary range adjustment for the Public Services. Assistant position in my 94/95 budget numbers in programs 1011, 1015, 1016, 2028, and 7073. Last year when we established the position, there was no change in the range from the position formerly called CSO /Emergency Preparedness Coordinator. As we anticipated, in the last nine months the quantity and complexity of the job duties for this position have increased significantly. This position has major program responsibilities for emergency preparedness, animal control, and solid waste. In addition the position handles various law enforcement support activities, and staffs the Public_ Safety Commission. The Public Services Assistant position is now in Range 89. My budget figures show an adjustment of 5% to Range 94, for fy 94/95. I also anticipate adjusting it again in 95/96 by another 4%, to Range 98. t Ca olyn King Printed on recycled paper. Effective July 1, 1994, the following positions in the City service are assigned to the following ranges, and shall be paid at the rate of compensation shown below, RANGE 65 107 114 87 114 120 102 114 62 114 56 85 94 94 89 38 94 94 69 84 120 117 94 114 76 98 76 92 114 65 114 94 69 84 89 89 POSITION Account Clerk Accountant Administrative Analyst Admin. Secretary Assistant Engineer Associate Engineer Assistant Planner Associate Planner Build. Maint. Custodian Building Inspector Clerk Typist Community Service Off. Deputy City Clerk Facil. Maint. Leadworker Irrigation Specialist Japanese Grdn. Caretaker Japanese Grdn. Special. Parks Maint. Leadworker Parks Maint. Worker I Parks Maint. Worker II Plan Check Engineer Plan Check Examiner Public Services Assistant Public Works Inspector Recreation Prog. Coord. Recreation Supervisor Secretary Secretary to City Manager Senior Accountant Senior Clerk Typist Senior Eng. Tech. Street Maint. Leadworker Street Maint. Worker I Street Maint. Worker II Street Maint. Specialist Volunteer Coordinator A Step B Step C Step 2031 2082 2133 3085 3162 3239 3308 3390 3473 2528 2591 2655 3308 3390 3473 3511 3599 3687 2935 3009 3082 3308 3390 3473 1971 2021 2070 3308 3390 3473 1857 1904 1950 2478 2540 2602 2711 2778 2846 2711 2778 2846 2579 2644 2708 1553 1591 1630 2711 2778 2846 2711 2778 2846 2114 2167 2219 2454 2515 2577 3511 3599 3687 3408 3493 3578 2711 2778 2846 3308 3390 3473 2266 2323 2379 2821 2891 2962 2266 2323 2379 2657 2724 2790 3308 3390 3473 2031 2082 2133 3308 3390 3473 2711 2778 2846 2114 2167 2219 2454 2515 2577 2579 2644 2708 2579 2644 2708 D Step E Step 2186 2239 3320 3401 3560 3647 2721 2787 3560 3647 3779 3871 3159 3236 3560 3647 2122 2174 3560 3647 1999 2048 2667 2733 2917 2988 2917 2988 2776 2843 1671 1712 2917 2988 2917 2988 2275 2330 2641 2705 3779 3871 3668 3757 2917 2988 3560 3647 2439 2498 3036 3110 2439 2498 2860 2930 3560 3647 2186 2239 3560 3647 2917 2988 2275 2330 2641 2705 2776 2843 2776 2843 Revised 7/1/94 F Step G Step H Step 2295 2351 2410 3486 3571 3661 3738 3829 3925 2857 2927 3000 3738 3829 3925 3968 4064 4166 3317 3398 3483 3738 3829 3925 2228 2282 2339 3738 3829 3925 2099 2150 2204 2801 2869 2941 3063 3138 3216 3063 3138 3216 2915 2986 3060 1755 1797 1842 3063 3138 3216 3063 3138 3216 2389 2447 2508 2773 2841 2912 3968 4064 4166 3851 3945 4044 3063 3138 3216 3738 3829 3925 2561 2623 2689 3188 3265 3347 2561 2623 2689 3003 3076 3153 3738 3829 3925 2295 2351 2410 3738 3829 3925 3063 3138 3216 2389 2447 2508 2773 2841 2912 2915 2986 3060 2915 2986 3060 Step 2469 3750 4020 3073 4020 4268 3568 4020 2396 4020 2257 3013 3295 3295 3135 1887 3295 3295 2569 2983 4268 4142 3295 4020 2755 3429 2755 3230 4020 2469 4020 3295 2569 2983 3135 3135 J Step K Step 2531 2592 3844 3937 4121 4221 3150 3227 4121 4221 4374 4481 3657 3746 4121 4221 2456, 2516 4121 4221 2314 2370 3088 3163 3377 3460 3377 3460 3213 3292 1934 1982 3377 3460 3377 3460 2633 2698 3057 3132 4374 4481 4246 4349 3377 3460 4121 4221 2823 2892 3514 3600 2823 2892 3311 3391 4121 4221 2531 2592 4121 4221 3377 3460 2633 2698 3057 3132 3213 3292 3213 3292 nA 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE • SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 • (408) 867 -3438 June 23, 1994 To:. City Council From: Assistant to the City Manager COUNCIL MEMBERS: Subject: Management Salary Range Adjustment for 1994 -95 Karen Anderson Ann Marie Burger Willem Kohler Victor Monia Karen Tucker I have completed the annual salary survey for the management salary range adjustment. According to the management compensation plan adopted by Council last year, the salary scale is based on the mean of the tops of the ranges of benchmark positions in a four county area. Adjustment to the ranges does not result in any automatic movement of employees. The proposed ranges are keyed on the mean top of the range for the Public Works Director position. Other ranges are adjusted to fall within the internal relationships set forth in the salary plan for management positions. City Manager: The City Managers' salaries from the survey are actual salary, not top of range. Since the internal relationship sets a salary differential of 15% between the City Manager and the Public Works Director, the top of the range for City Manager is set at 15% above the mean top of range for the Public Works Director. The top of range for the City Manager then becomes $8,272, an increase of $305 per month. Department Heads: The top of the range for the Public Works Director is set at the survey mean of $7,193 per month, an increase of $265 per month. The Community Development Director is set at 20% below the range of the City Manager as determined by the internal relationship which results in a top of range of $6,893, $135 above the survey mean and an increase of $254 a month. The Finance Director is set at 25% below the range of the City Manager as determined by the internal relationship which results in a top of range of $6,617 per month, $152 below the survey mean, and an increase of $243 per month. Printed on recycled paper. The Assistant to the City Manager is set at 8% below the survey mean for Assistant City Manager, and 36% below the City Manager range. This is within the internal relationship range of 30 -40 %, resulting in a top of range of $6,069 per month, a reduction of $59 per month. The Recreation Director is set at 8% below the survey mean for Recreation Director, as most positions surveyed include responsibility for parks. It is 40% below the City Manager which is within the internal relationship range of 40 -50 %, resulting in a top of range of $5,908 a month, and an increase of $217 per month. Middle Management: The City Codes Administrator is set at 20% below the range of the Community Development Director as determined by the internal relationships. This results in a top salary of $5,741 a month, a decrease of $32 per month. The Parks and Buildings Superintendent and the Street Superintendent positions are set at 35% below the Public Works Director as determined by the internal relationship which results in a top salary of $5,328 per month, an increase of $176. Attached to this memo are a copy of the management compensation plan adopted by the Council last year, the management salary survey, and a separate salary survey of city managers. J Ca olyn King 94/95 Management Salary-Survey curr. curr. curr, proposed proposed 27- Jun -94 salary salary ,range range salary range asst. dev. *city finance pub.wks. recreation POP. city manager director manager director director director 40,263 Cupertino $7,001 $9,271 $7,001 $7,831 $6,713 36,048 Campbell range $6,615 $7,750 $6,615 $7,373 $6,615 31,608 Martinez $7,169 $8,475 pubwks dir $6,688 $6,468 31,565 San Bruno $5,754 $6,901 cm /pwd $6,796 $7,414 $6,654 31,585 Pleasant Hill $6;639 $7,600 $10,106 $7,550 $7,925 20% 31,487 Gilroy fin dir $6,624 $8,153 $6,624 $7,237 $6,624 28,176 Foster City $7,143 $6,946 $8,244 $6,286 $7,152 $6,098 28;061 Saratoga $6,069 $6,639 $7,430 $6,374 $6,928 $5,691 28,040 Menlo Park $6,183 $6,833 $7,715 cm /rd 40% $5,971 27,357 Los Gatos $5,726 $5,967 $7,890 $4,593 $5,741 cdd /cca 26,801 Burlingame 15 to 25 $7,128 $8,465 $7,190 $7,687 $6,339 26,303 Los Altos pwd /ps $6,793 $7,416 $6,793 $6,793 $6,793 26,167 San Carlos $6,548 $5,328 $8,250 35% $7,252 $6,541 24,127 Belmont $6,346 $7,667 $6,768 $5,954 23,928 Morgan Hill $6,458 $6,667 $6,458 $6,458 mean $6,554 $6,758 $8,107 $6,769 $7,193 $6,372 notes: all salaries at top of range except all city manager's are actual all salaries adjusted for employer payment of 7% PERS the following cities also have PIERS 2% @ 55: Cupertino, Los Gatos,Martinez, Foster City most Recreation Director positions also have parks position curr. curr. curr, proposed proposed salary salary salary ,range range salary range range differ. differ. difference bottom top bottom top comp. percent percentage actual range cty mgr $6,374 $7,967 $7,430 $6,618 $8,272 pubwks dir $5,542 $6,928 $6,458 $5,754 $7,193 cm /pwd 15% 15 to 25 com dev dir $5,311 $6;639 $5,953 $5,514 $6,893 cm /cdd 20% 20 to 30 fin dir $5,099 $6,374 $6,123 $5,294 $6,617 cm /fd 25% 25 to 35 asst to cm $4,902 $6,128 $5,818 $4,855. $6,069 cm /attcm 36% 30 to 40 rec dir $4,553 $5,691 $5,342 $4,726 $5,908 cm /rd 40% 40 to 50 city codes adm $4,618 $5,773 $5,460 $4,593 $5,741 cdd /cca 20% 15 to 25 parks supt $4,106 $5,132 $4,757 $4,262 $5,328 pwd /ps 35% 35 to 45 streets supt $4,106 $5,132 $4,757 $4,262 $5,328 pwd /ss 35% 35 to 45 *actual salary as cities do not have a salary range for the City Manager. COMPARATIVE SALARY SURVEY - SELECTED CITY MANAGERS CITY HIRE DATE POP DATE SALARY PER CAPITA CUPERTINO 01/3Q/89 41,827 06/14/93 $9,271 $0.22 * SAN BRUNO 05/01/94 40,275 05/01/94 $8,835 $0.22 * CAMPBELL 07/06/92 37,105 07/06/92 $7,750 $0.21 MARTINEZ 04/05/90 34,997 05/01/93 $8,475 $0.24 GILROY 07/15/83 32,695 07/01/93 $8,153 $0.25 PLEASANT HILLO-6 /15/87 31,871 05/01/94 $10,106 $0.32 MENLO PARK 01/15/90 29,407 01/01/94 $7,715 $0.26 * FOSTER CITY 1977 29,249 07/01/93 -$8,244 $0.28 SARATOGA 09/01/85 28,390 07/01/93 $7,430 $0.26 LOS GATOS 09/04/90 28,175 09/04/93 $7,890 $0.28 * BURLINGAME 02/82 27,831 06/28/93 $8,465 $0.30 SAN CARL-OS 05/11/87 27,147 07/01/93 $8,250 $0.30 LOS ALTOS 05/15/90 27,040 01/01/94 $7.,416 $0.27 BELMONT 05/01/94 25,056 05/01/94 $7,.667 $0.31 AVG 31,505 $8,262 $0.27 RANGE: HIGH 41,827 $10,106 $0.33 LOW 25,056 $7,416 $0.21 * Reduced by 7% to account for no City PERS Employee Contribution. City contributes 7% PERS Employee Contribution in all other cities. SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO.' 2�i AGENDA ITEM MEETING DATE: 7/6./94 CITY MGR. ORIGINATING DEPT. City Manager's office SUBJECT: Reallocation of general fund monies to SASCC for 194 -95 program year Recommended Motion(s): 1. Approve reallocation of funding of $4,000 to Saratoga Area Senior Coordinating Council for 1994 -95 program year. 2. Adopt the Appropriations Resolution Report SummarX: In February of this year, the City Council held a Public Hearing to receive comments and recommendations on projects proposed for 1994/95 Housing and Community Development Act (HCDA) funds. At that time, Council was asked to make determinations regarding the allocations of federal HCDA monies which was at that time anticipated to be approximately $159,500. Of the total grant to the County, a maximum of fifteen percent can be used for human services activities. In February County staff provided figures indicating that $40,000 would be available to us for human services projects. The 1994 -95 allocations 'to SASCC for the Day Care Program and operating costs was approved at $64,417 of which $40,000 would be from HCDA funds and $24,417 from the city's general funds. Recently the, County has informed us that after having confirmed the final figures for the total grant, only $36,000 is available to us for human services activities. Therefore, in order to make up the difference, the City Council is requested to approve an additional appropriation from the general fund of $4,000 to SASCC. Funding will then be $28,417 from the general fund and $36,000 from HCDA funds. The $4,000 that was originally allocated to SASCC has been transferred to the city's ADA Compliance Project fund that is also being funded by HCDA monies and does not fall under the human services limit. Fiscal Impacts: An additional $4,000 would be appropriated from the general funds Lo L11-le -Saratoga Area Senior Coordinating Council (SASCC). Advertising, Noticing and Public Contact: None Consequences of Not Acting on the Recommended Motions: The city's grant to,SASCC for the 1994 -95 program year would be reduced to $60,417 from $64,417. Follow.Up,Actions: None Attachments: Appropriations Resolution Program listing from County for HCD funding Budget Summary sheet for Senior Services Activities jnb claris /20th year folder city project Ws 6/24/94 VA FUNDING AMOUNT $ 36,000 124,000 PROJECT NUMBERS 20TH PROGRAM YEAR FUNDING SANTA CLARA COUNTY HCD PROGRAM ACTIVITY PROJECT NUMBER NAME SARATOGA: (4 PROJECTS) SA -95 -31 Saratoga Adult Senior Coordinating Council - (SASCC) SA -95 -41 ADA Compliance - Architectural Barrier Removal City Facilities jnb claris /20th year folder city project Ws 6/24/94 VA FUNDING AMOUNT $ 36,000 124,000 BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL 1993 -1995 PROGRAM TITLE: COMMUNITY SERVICES ACTIVITY TITLE :Senior Services PROGRAM CODE: 4045 EXPENDITURES PAGE 53 MANAGER RESPONSIBLE: RECREATION DIRECTOR ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL REVISED REVISED .1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 EXPENDITURE EXPENDITURE EXPENDITURE BUDGET BUDGET $64,000 $64,225 $64,417 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ RESOURCES FUND 01 - GENERAL 12 _ H.C.D.A. TOTAL RESOURCES 1993 $29,000 $35,000 1994 $19,225 $45,000 1995 $24,417 $40,000 $64,000 $64,225 $64,417 OBJECTIVES AND PLANNED PERFORMANCE: This activity provides for a grant to the Saratoga Area Senior Coordinating Council for SASCC operation and Senior Day Care. I SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO. 2,q- S AGENDA ITEM MEETING DATE: JULY 6, 1994 CITY MGR.: ORIGINATING DEPT.: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. HEAD: SUBJECT: Approval of Cooperative Agreement No. 3 -SAR with Santa Clara County Traffic Authority for Installation of Ball Screen at Congress Springs Park, Capital Project No. 9307 Recommended Motion(s): Move to approve Cooperative Agreement No. 3 -SAR and authorize its execution by staff. Report Summary: Attached for Council's review and approval is another proposed Cooperative Agreement between the City and the Santa Clara County Traffic Authority. This agreement, No. 3 -SAR, stipulates the terms and conditions by which the City and the Authority will agree to install a protective screen along the freeway soundwall adjacent to Congress Springs Park to prevent baseballs and soccer balls from flying into the freeway corridor from the park. A little over a year ago, the City Attorney researched the issue of liability if an accident were to be caused on the freeway as a result of a ball being launched into the freeway from the park. His opinion dated April 8, 1993 is attached. In summary, the City Attorney concluded that the City could be held fully liable for such an accident, although he does cite a specific case which the City could use to support the position that the liability rests with CALTRANS. The legal counsel for the Traffic Authority however, is of the opinion that the liability rests fully with the City. After negotiating the matter with the Traffic Authority, the Authority has agreed to fund one -half of the cost of a 1,320 -foot long, 35 -foot high protective screen which staff estimates to be $60,000. The City would fund the other one -half of the cost and administer the construction of the screen. The City Attorney has reviewed the proposed Agreement and is satisfied with its contents. Assuming the Council approves the Agreement, staff will execute it and proceed with soliciting bids. A construction contract should then be ready for you to award at your August 3 meeting, and the installation of the screen will be complete by the beginning of October. Fiscal Impacts: As stated above, the estimated cost of the screen is $60,000. The City's share therefor is $30,000. Sufficient funds for the project are programmed in the FY 94 -95 budget in Capital Project No. 9307. Advertising, Noticing and Public Contact: Nothing additional. Consequences of Not Acting on the Recommended Motions: The Cooperative Agreement would not be approved and staff would not proceed with soliciting bids for the project. Any significant delays could result in the project not being complete by the scheduled opening of Route 85 on October 19. If the freeway were to open before the screen is installed, the City could face significant liabilities as discussed above. Follow Up Actions: Staff will execute the Agreement and proceed with soliciting bids. Attachments: 1. Proposed Cooperative Agreement No. 3 -SAR. 2. Memo from City Attorney dated April 8, 1993. EXHIBIT A CONGRESS SPRINGS PARK - LOCATION MAP PROJECT LOCATION to ftoule lul Michael R. Nave Steven R. Meyers Elizabeth H. Silver Michael S. Riback Clifford F. Campbell Michael F. Rodriquez Kathleen Faubion Frederick S. Etheridge Wendy A. Roberts David W. Skinner Steven T. Mattas Of counsel: Andrea J. Saltzman MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK & SILVER A Professional Law Corporation Gateway Plaza 777 Davis Street, Suite 300 San Leandro, CA 94577 Telephone: (510) 351 -4300 Facsimile: (510) 351 -4481 CONFIDENTIAL -- PRIVILEGED MEMORANDUM Peninsula Office 1220 Howard Avenue, Suite 250 Burlingame, CA 94010-4211 Telephone: (415) 348 -7130 Facsimile: (415) 342 -0886 Sonoma Countv (707) 546 -3126 Reply to: San Leandro TO: Larry Perlin DATE: April 8, 1993 City Engineer FROM: Michael S. Riback City Attorney RE: Highway 85 /Baseball Field You asked for an opinion as to the relative responsibility of the California Department of Transportation and the City to pay the costs to build a thirty foot high fence separating a city baseball park from the new Highway 85 extension to protect against balls flying from the field landing on Highway 85. FACTS A number of years ago the California Department of Transportation (Cal Trans) developed plans to construct the portion of Highway 85, which would pass through Saratoga. As Cal Trans acquired the necessary property, the City built a baseball field adjacent to the proposed highway. Highway construction has recently begun. Cal Trans has notified the City that a thirty foot high fence must be built around the park to protect the highway from baseballs hit or thrown from the park. Cal Trans has asked the City to pay half of the fence's construction costs. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS It is likely that the City would be held responsible to pay part, if not all of the construction costs of a fence constructed to protect highway users from errant balls from the baseball field. The theory regarding Cal Trans' responsibility, existence of the park prior to highway construction, may be difficult to prove given the fact that the highway was planned prior to the baseball park. TO: Larry Perlin, City Engineer FROM: Michael S. Riback, City Attorney RE: Highway 85 /Baseball Field DATE: April 8, 1993 PAGE: 2 It is likely that liability will be determined in part on an interpretation of Government Code § 835. ANALYSIS In determining who should pay fence construction costs, it is first necessary to determine liability for injuries caused by baseballs hit or thrown from the park. The responsible party should then pay construction costs. A. City Liability California cases were not found which discussed a park owner's liability for injuries caused by a ball hit or thrown from a park. In other jurisdictions, (m)unicipalities have generally been held liable for their negligence in operating or maintaining public parks in such a manner as to increase the hazards to persons on adjoining streets or premises of being hit by batted or thrown baseballs." (16 ALR 2d 1450, 1460). The inherent nature of the game of baseball requires a park owner to take reasonable precautions for the protection of the travelling public (Salevan v. Wilmington Park (Del Super) 72 A2d 239). Similar holdings can be found with regard to golf balls hit off of a course. If the owner has notice of balls landing on a nearby highway, and fails to lessen the dangers to persons lawfully using the highway, liability could result. (53 ALR 4th 282, 343 § 24) Cal Trans has notified Saratoga of the park's alleged potential danger. It is therefore likely that the City would be liable for injuries from hit or thrown baseballs. B. Cal Trans Liability One theory may assist the City in obtaining Cal Trans' assistance in paying for fence construction. That involves the notice that Cal Trans had of the park's existence, and the possibility of baseballs landing on Highway 85. One California court has held that a golf course was not a nuisance to neighboring property owners since the latter's property was purchased with the knowledge that it was next to a golf course. (Hellman v. La Cumbre TO: Larry Perlin, City Engineer FROM: Michael S. Riback, City Attorney RE: Highway 85 /Baseball Field DATE: April 8, 1993 PAGE: 3 Golf and Country Club (1992) 8 Cal.Rptr.2d 293, 297) Similarly, Cal Trans had notice that Highway 85 would be next to a baseball field. While Hellman appears favorable to our situation, it can be distinguished. There, plaintiffs purchased the property knowing of its proximity to the golf course. Here, Cal Trans proposed Highway 85 prior to City plans to construct the ballpark. Cal Trans could argue that when it acquired the right -of -way it did not have constructive notice of the ballpark, and therefore could not be liable for injuries caused by balls leaving the park. It is likely that any discussion of liability will involve § 835 of the Government Code, which holds a public entity liable for a dangerous condition of its property if it is established that, "the property was in dangerous condition at the time of the injury, that the injury was proximately caused by the dangerous condition, that the dangerous condition created a reasonably foreseeable risk of the kind of injury which was incurred, and that . (b) the public entity had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition" a sufficient time prior to the injury to have taken preventive measures. In a suit for injuries caused by baseballs hit or thrown from the park, a plaintiff would argue that the highway area near the ballpark met the conditions of § 835. Without the fence near the park, the highway would contain a dangerous condition. Injuries caused by baseballs hit form a fenceless park are reasonably foreseeable, given the inherent nature of the sport of baseball. Finally, based on their study, Cal Trans had actual notice of the dangerous condition, and sufficient time to take preventative measures. Unfortunately, identical, and perhaps more convincing arguments could be made against the City. As Highway 85 was planned prior to the ballpark, the latter could be deemed the dangerous condition, with the City fully liable for any injuries resulting from park use. MSR:edt A 154,1� 273 \mem0\01 \apri193 \hwy85.msr 413 2_4�s COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 3 -SAR ROUTE 85 CONSTRUCTION OF SAFETY NETTING ALONG SOUNDWALL ADJACENT TO CONGRESS SPRINGS PARK This AGREEMENT is entered into on the day of , 1994, by and between the SANTA CLARA COUNTY TRAFFIC AUTHORITY, a public entity of the State of California (referred to hereinafter as "AUTHORITY ") and the City of Saratoga, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California (referred to hereinafter as "CITY "). RECITALS 1. AUTHORITY and CITY contemplate constructing improvements consisting of construction of protective netting along the soundwall along Route 85, (on the CITY's property) adjacent to Congress Springs Park, herein referred to as "PROJECT." A diagram identifying the location of the PROJECT is attached as EXHIBIT A and is hereby incorporated by this reference. 2. Construction of PROJECT is necessary to safeguard motorists on Route 85 which is part of the AUTHORITY's Measure A Program. 3. CITY is willing to provide design consisting of plans, specifications and estimates (PS &E) for PROJECT. 4. CITY is willing to provide final design, construction administration of PROJECT and construct PROJECT by contract. Construction administration shall include pre - contract administration (processing of PS &E through a bidding process for advertising, bid evaluation and award of contract for constructing PROJECT), construction contract administration, construction engineering, inspection, materials testing, claims processing and closeout. 5. CITY is willing to reimburse AUTHORITY for AUTHORITY'S share of preliminary engineering provided by AUTHORITY'S consultant. 6. CITY shall assume ownership and maintenance of PROJECT, upon CITY'S final acceptance of PROJECT. 7. AUTHORITY and CITY will share equally the costs of preliminary engineering, and construction as specified in this Agreement. COOPmsa.no 106 -10 Agreement No. 3 -SAR June 23, 1994 Page 1 of 6 8. AUTHORITY and CITY do mutually desire to cooperate in the design, construction, and construction administration of the PROJECT, and to set forth herein the terms and conditions under which the PROJECT is to be administered, designed, constructed, and maintained. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: SECTION I AUTHORITY AGREES: 1. To provide preliminary engineering for PROJECT. 2. To bear fifty percent (50 %), estimated to be $3,000, of the total actual cost of preliminary engineering of PROJECT. 3. To bear fifty percent (50 %), estimated to be $32,500, of the total actual cost of construction of PROJECT including all materials, supplemental work, changes and claims associated with construction of PROJECT. 4. AUTHORITY's obligation for the total actual cost of preliminary engineering and construction required for PROJECT under this Agreement is $35,500. This amount may be exceeded only by vote of AUTHORITY, the certified results of which will be incorporated into the Agreement without the necessity of a written amendment. 5. To pay CITY within 30 days after receipt of invoice from CITY as described in Section II, Articles 16 and 17 below. SECTION II CITY AGREES: 1. To proceed with PROJECT following execution of this cooperative agreement between CITY and AUTHORITY; or, in the event the PROJECT does not proceed for any reason, to so notify AUTHORITY. COOPmsa.no 106 -10 Agreement No. 3 -SAR June 23, 1994 Page 2 of 6 2. To provide all permits and clearances for work on CITY property required for PROJECT at no cost to AUTHORITY. 3. To relocate any utilities or park appurtenances prior to, or during construction at no cost to AUTHORITY. 4. To provide plans, specifications and estimates (PS &E) for PROJECT at no cost to AUTHORITY. 5. To notify AUTHORITY of amount of construction contract award for PROJECT within fifteen days of award of said contract. 6. To provide, or arrange to have provided, construction administration for PROJECT as defined in RECITALS, Article 4 above, at no cost to AUTHORITY. 7. To construct PROJECT by contract in accordance with (PS &E) provided by CITY. 8. To bear fifty percent (50 %), estimated to be $3,000, of the total actual cost of preliminary engineering provided by AUTHORITY'S consultant. 9. To bear one hundred percent (100 %) of the total actual cost of design and construction administration as defined in RECITALS, Article 3 and 4 above. 10. To bear fifty percent (50 %), estimated to be $32,500, of the total actual cost of construction of PROJECT including all materials, supplemental work, changes and claims associated with construction of PROJECT. IL That CITY's obligation for the total actual cost of preliminary engineering and construction required for PROJECT under this Agreement is $35,500. This total obligation shall be increased to cover costs in excess of the initial estimated total costs of preliminary engineering and construction if actual costs exceed estimate without the necessity of a written amendment to this Agreement. 12. To submit to AUTHORITY each month a DBE utilization report which describes DBE expenditures for the current month, states cumulative DBE amount expended to date and any significant events affecting DBE subcontractors such as schedule delays and changes in scope of work. COOPmsa.no 106 -10 Agreement No. 3 -SAR June 23, 1994 Page 3 of 6 13. To submit to AUTHORITY each month a construction progress report which describes the work performed and completed during the reporting period, states the cumulative percentage complete to date, and reports on change orders issued (current and cumulative), progress payments made (current and cumulative), and significant events affecting progress of the work, such as bad weather, and work stoppages. 14. To consult with AUTHORITY on any change order or extra work order exceeding $500, before implementation, except when necessary for the safety of motorists and/or pedestrians or for the protection of property. 15. To provide for maintenance of all facilities as constructed under this PROJECT in accordance with RECITALS, Article 6 above, and make no claim against AUTHORITY for any portion of such maintenance expense. 16. Within ten days after award of construction contract to provide to AUTHORITY an invoice for AUTHORITY's share of construction costs for PROJECT based on the amount of the contract award. 17. Within sixty days after completion of PROJECT and all work incidental thereto, and resolution of all claims filed by the construction contractor, to provide to AUTHORITY a detailed statement of the total actual costs of construction of PROJECT, and an invoice, if necessary, for AUTHORITY'S share of additional construction costs for PROJECT, or refund for AUTHORITY's overpayment, if appropriate. 18. Within sixty calendar days of completion of construction of PROJECT and all work incidental thereto, to provide to AUTHORITY a detailed final statement of the total actual DBE costs expended for PROJECT. If the final DBE achievements have not met the goal of 10 %, a written explanation must be submitted to AUTHORITY. COOPmsa.no 106 -10 Agreement No. 3 -SAR June 23, 1994 Page 4 of 6 SECTION III IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED: 1. If the lowest responsible bid is more than the Engineer's Estimate, AUTHORITY and CITY shall consult upon a course of action. If a course of action is not agreed upon within 25 calendar days after receipt of bid, this Agreement shall be deemed to be terminated by mutual consent pursuant to Article 2 of this Section III. 2. Prior to award of the construction contract for PROJECT this Agreement may be terminated by either AUTHORITY or CITY or by mutual consent. In the event of such termination, AUTHORITY and CITY shall each bear their respective total actual costs expended for PROJECT to date of termination. 3. Should the value of the construction contract award be lower than the total estimated cost of construction of PROJECT, the estimated cost of construction and construction administration of PROJECT in Sections I and II above shall be proportionally reduced without the necessity of an amendment to this Agreement. 4. That neither AUTHORITY, nor any officer or employee thereof, shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully indemnify and hold AUTHORITY harmless from any liability imposed for injury, as defined by Government Code Section 810.8, occurring by reason of anything done or omitted by CITY under this Agreement or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. 5. That neither CITY, nor any officer or employee thereof, shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted by AUTHORITY or any contractor hired by AUTHORITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to AUTHORITY under this Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, AUTHORITY shall fully indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any liability imposed for injury, as defined by Government Code Section 810.8, occurring by reason of anything done or omitted by AUTHORITY under this Agreement or in connection with any work, authority or COOPmsa.no 106 -10 Agreement No. 3 -SAR June 23, 1994 Page 5 of 6 jurisdiction delegated to AUTHORITY under this Agreement. 6. Except as provided in Articles 1 and 2 of this Section III, the portions of this Agreement pertaining to the construction of PROJECT shall terminate upon completion and acceptance of the PROJECT by CITY and upon fulfillment by AUTHORITY and CITY of their respective financial obligations under this Agreement. SANTA CLARA COUNTY TRAFFIC AUTHORITY By JAMES T. BEALL, JR. Chairperson APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: WILLIAM I. ANDERSON Chief Deputy County Counsel Attest: PHYLLIS A. PEREZ Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and Secretary, to the Santa Clara County Traffic Authority COOPmsa.no 106 -10 June 23, 1994 By HARRY PEACOCK City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: MICHAEL RIBACK City Attorney Attest: GRACE E. COREY Deputy City Clerk Agreement No. 3 -SAR Page 6 of 6 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO. 246 � AGENDA ITED MEETING DATE: JULY 6, 1994 CITY MGR.: ORIGINATING DEPT.: PUBLIC WORKS DEF T. HEAD; SUBJECT: Leonard Road Improvements, Capital Project No. 9308 - Final Acceptance and Notice of Completion Recommended Motion(s): Move to accept the project as complete and authorize staff to record the Notice of Completion for the construction contract. Report Summary: All work on the Leonard Road Improvements, Capital Project No. 9308, has been completed by the City's contractor, Duran and Venables, Inc., and inspected by City staff. The final construction cost for the project was $91,489, which is 5.4% above the awarded contract amount of $86,776. The additional costs were primarily due to unit price changes as a result of the delayed start on the project, curb ramps installed on either side of the intersection at Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road, and additional work required at several of the driveway approaches. In order to close out the construction contract and begin the one year maintenance /warranty period, it is recommended that the Council accept the project as complete. Further, it is recommended that the Council authorize staff to record the attached Notice of Completion for the construction contract so that the requisite 30 day Stop Notice period for the filing of claims by subcontractors or material providers may commence. Fiscal Impacts: The ten percent retention withheld from previous payments to the contractor will be released 30 days after recordation of the Notice of Completion assuming no Stop Notices are filed with the City. The adopted budget contains sufficient funds in Project No. 9308, Account No. 4510, to cover the entire cost of the project including the executed change orders. Follow Up Actions: Staff will record the Notice of Completion for the construction contract and release the contract sureties and retention thirty days thereafter. Consequences of Not Acting on the Recommended Motions: The project would not be accepted as complete and staff would notify the contractor of any additional work required by the City Council before the project would be accepted as complete. Advertising, Noticing and Public Contact: Nothing additional. Attachments: 1. Contract Summary. 2. Notice of Completion. CONTRACT SUMMARY PROJECT: Leonard Road Improvement Project - C.I.P. #9308 CONTRACTOR: Duran & Venables, Inc. CONTRACT DATE: 12/01/93 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $86,776 C.O. AUTHORITY: $7,500 CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: 07/06/94 TOTAL C.O. AMOUNT: $4,713 FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $91,489 PERCENT +/- FROM ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: +5.4% Recording requested by, and to be returned to: Saratoga City Clerk 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the work agreed to be performed under the contract mentioned below between the City of Saratoga, a municipal corporation, whose address is 13777 Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga, CA 95070, as Owner of property or property rights, and the Contractor mentioned below, on property of the Owner, was accepted as complete by the Owner on the 6th day of July, 1994. Contract Number: N/A Contract Date: December 1, 1993 Contractor's Name: Duran & Venables, Inc. Contractor's Address: 2700 Scott Blvd., P.O. Box 640, Santa Clara, CA 95066 Description of Work: Leonard Road Improvement Project- C.I.P. No. 9308 This notice is given in accordance with the provisions of Section 3093 of the Civil Code of the State of California. The undersigned certifies that he is an officer of the City of Saratoga, that he has read the foregoing Notice of Acceptance of Completion and knows the contents thereof; and that the same is true of his own knowledge, except as to those matters which are therein stated on information or belief, and as to those matters that he believes to be true. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at the City of Saratoga, County of Santa Clara, State of California on , 19 CITY OF SARATOGA BY: Larry I. Perlin Director Of Public Works ATTEST: Grace E. Cory, Deputy City Clerk Gov. Code 40814 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO. 2,4(o,-7 AGENDA ITEM 8 MEETING DATE: JULY 6, 1994 CITY MGR.: ORIGINATING DEPT.: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. HEAD: i SUBJECT: Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District LLA -1 - Public Meeting to Reauthorize District for FY 94 -95 Recommended Motion(s): None required. Receive public comment and direct staff accordingly. Report Summary: At your meeting next Wednesday, the Council will conduct the Public Meeting specified under Gov't. Code Section 54954.6. The public meeting is necessary because several of the proposed assessments for FY 94 -95 are increased from the current year's assessments. Specifically, the assessments are proposed to be increased in Zones 2, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17 and 22, (see attached chart showing the history of the annual LLA assessments since the inception of the District) . The above Zones comprise 2,432 of the 3,602 properties within the District. Notices informing each of these property owners of the proposed increase in their respective assessments, as well as of the date and time of the Public Meeting and the August 3 Protest Hearing, were mailed on June 17. As a result of decisions made at the June 15 Council meeting, I have modified my initial proposal to merge Zones 2 and 9 into Zone 25, and Zones 10, 14 and 18 into Zone 26. The reason for abandoning these mergers has to do with the different deficits which have accumulated in each Zone over the years, and to avoid the situation where the assessments for the property owners in one Zone are increased in order to make up a portion of a def icit which has accumulated in another Zone. Instead, the Zones which I have proposed to merge will be kept separate until each Zone's deficit is eliminated. At such time, the Zones may then be merged. In the meantime however, it is still proposed to distribute the maintenance costs for Zones 2 and 9, as well as for Zones 10, 14 and 18, equally to each property within each respective Zone as though the Zones are combined. I believe this promotes the greatest equity amongst all of the properties in each of these five Zones. Lastly, I have refined the assessment formula for the new Village Commercial Zone, Zone 24. This Zone is proposed to be created by merging the four Village Parking Districts, Zones 8, 19, 20 and 21, and the Village Commercial Lighting District, Zone 0. However, because of the large surplus which has accumulated in these Zones, it is proposed that there be no assessment for next year for any of the Village Commercial properties. The attached chart however illustrates how the assessments might result in FY 95 -96 based on current estimated costs. The Council is not required to take any action at the Public Meeting. The meeting is simply an opportunity for affected property owners to address the Council about the proposed assessments, ask questions and request information. My office has logged a considerable number of calls from property owners who have received notices, and the most commonly asked question is "What am I paying for ?" My observation is that once property owners receive an answer to this question, they appear, for the most part, to be satisfied and accept the proposed assessment since they recognize the benefits it provides to their properties. We have however received a number of protests thus far, and at your meeting, I will update you on the number of protests which have been filed within each Zone. Fiscal Impacts: None directly. All of the costs associated with the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District are recovered from the assessments. Advertising, Noticing and Public Contact: Notices prescribed by Govt. Code Section 54954.6(c) (1) have been mailed to those property owners within the District whose assessments are proposed to be increased from the current year. Consequences of Not Acting on the Recommended Motions: N /A. Follow Up Actions: Depends on whatever decisions the Council makes. The Protest Hearing is scheduled for August 3. Attachments: 1. Proposed assessment schedule. 2. History of LLA assessments. 3. Pro -forma assessment schedule for Zone 24. 4. Description of activities proposed within each Zone for FY 94 -95. CITY OF SARATOGA - LLA -1 FY 94 -95 ZONE 1 # OF PARCELS 29 FACTOR 0.0081 ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS WAGES & BENEFITS ATTORNEY ASSESS.ENGRG. ADVTSG. MISC. INDIRECT COSTS OVERHEAD TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS WAGES & BENEFITS CONTR. MAINT. CONTR. REPAIRS IRRIGATION WATER ELECTRIC POWER INDIRECT COSTS OVERHEAD TOTAL CONSTRUCTION SUB -TOTAL RESERVE ALLOWANCE TOTAL COST PRIOR YR. CARRYOVER EST. PROP. TAX NET COST C'OVER NOT RECOVERED COVER TO FY 95 -96 NET TO ASSESS CALCULATED ASSESSMENT PROPOSED ASSESSMENT C: \WK \LLA19495 ZONE 2 ZONE 3 ZONE 4 ZONE 5 ZONE 6 ZONE 7 ZONE 9 ZONE 10 ZONE 11 85 167 697 107 64 765 48 9 250 0.0236 0.0464 0.1935 0.0297 0.0178 0.2124 0.0133 0.0025 0.0694 $185.79 $544.57 $1,069.92 $4,465.48 $685.52 $410.03 $4,901.14 $307.52 $57.66 $1,601.68 4.03 11.80 23.18 96.75 14.85 8.88 106.19 6.66 1.25 34.70 45.49 133.33 261.95 1,093.30 167.84 100.39 1,199.96 75.29 14.12 392.14 4.03 11.80 23.18 95.75 14.85 8.88 106.19 6.66 1.25 34.70 1.61 17.58 4.72 9.27 38.70 5.94 3.55 42.48 2.67 0.50 13.88 33 82 51.54 99.1 101.26 422.61 64.88 38.81 463.84 29.10 5.46 151.58 ----- 1 - - - - 194.73 - - - 812.74 - - - 124.77 - - - - 74.63 892.03 55.97 10.49 291.51 $292.34 $856.87 $1,683.50 $7,026.33 - -- $1,078.65 - - - - - -- $645.17 - - - - - -- $7,711.83 - - - - - -- $483.88 - - - - - -- $90.73 $2,520.21 2,040.00 4,754.90 2,340.00 2,685.10 1,066.50 1,260.00 510.00 1,188.73 585.00 671.27 266.62 315.00 250.00 1,671.25 250.00 943.75 337.50 450.00 127.82 13,000.00 6,500.00 1,500.00 3,000.00 72.18 45.00 - -- 366.24 1,012.74 - -- 415.29 1,700.40 - -- 850.20 196.20 392.40 571.90 224.40 264.87 $3,166.24 $8,755.44 $3,590.29 $14,700.40 $7,350.20 $1,696.20 $3,392.40 $4,944.20 $1,940.02 $2,289.87 $361.09 $203.91 $127.12 $3,458.58 $9,973.40 $5,273.79 $21,726.73 $8,428.85 $2,341.37 $11,104.23 $5,631.99 $2,157.87 $4,810.08 $3,458.58 $9,973.40 $5,273.79 $21,726.73 $8,428.85 $2,341.37 $11,104.23 $5,631.99 $2,157.87 $4,810.08 ($699.67) ($5,146.44) ($3,165.06) $53,986.69 $24,856.52 $715.32 $2,772.20 ($10,411.04) ($7,783.94) ($351.54) $1,150.00 $140.60 $1,580.00 $12,250.00 $4,950.00 $79.40 $3,008.25 $14,979.24 $6,858.85 ($44,509.96) ($21,377.67) $1,626.05 $8,332.03 $15,963.63 $9,941.81 $5,161.62 ($524.75) ($3,859.83) ($2,373.80) ($7,808.28) ($5,837.96) ($263.66) $44,509.96 $21,377.67 $2,483.50 $11,119.41 $4,485.05 $0.00 ($0.00) $1,626.05 $8,332.03 $8,155.35 $4,103.85 $4,897.96 $85.64 $130.82 $26.86 $0.00 ($0.00) $25.41 $10.89 $169.90 $455.98 $19.59 $85.62 $130.80 $26.86 $0.00 $0.00 $25.40 $10.88 $169.92 $456.00 $19.60 CITY OF SARATOGA - LLA -1 FY 94 -95 ZONE 12 # OF PARCELS 9 FACTOR 0.0025 ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS WAGES & BENEFITS ATTORNEY ASSESS. ENGRG. ADVTSG. MISC. INDIRECT COSTS OVERHEAD TOTAL MAINTENANCE COSTS WAGES & BENEFITS CONTR. MAINT. CONTR. REPAIRS IRRIGATION WATER ELECTRIC POWER INDIRECT COSTS OVERHEAD TOTAL CONSTRUCTION . SUB -TOTAL RESERVE ALLOWANCE TOTAL COST PRIOR YR. CARRYOVER EST. PROP. TAX NET COST COVER NOT RECOVERED COVER TO FY 95 -96 NET TO ASSESS CALCULATED ASSESSMENT PROPOSED ASSESSMENT C: \WK \LLA19495 ZONE 13 ZONE 14 ZONE 15 ZONE 16 ZONE 17 ZONE 18 ZONE 22 ZONE 24 TOTAL 36 20 41 55 200 11 891 118 3602 0.0100 0.0056 0.0114 0.0153 0.0555 0.0031 0.2474 0.0328 1.0000 $57.66 $230.64 $128.13 $262.68 $352.37 $1,281.34 $70.47 $5,708.39 $755.99 $23,077.00 1.25 5.00 2.78 5.69 7.63 27.76 1.53 123.68 16.38 500.00 14.12 56.47 31.37 64.31 86.27 313.71 17.25 1,397.60 185.09 5,650.00 1.25 5.00 2.78 5.69 7.63 27.76 1.53 123.68 16.38 500.00 0.50 2.00 1.11 2.28 3.05 11.10 0.61 49.47 6.55 200.00 5.46 21.83 12.13 24.86 33.35 121.27 6.67 540.24 71.55 2,184.00 - -- -1049 - -- -4198 - -- -23.32 - -- -47.81 - -- -64.13 233.21 12.83 1,038.95 137.59 4,200.12 $90.73 $362.91 $201.62 $413.31 $554.45 $2,016.16 $110.89 $8,982.01 $1,189.54 $36,311.12 1,500.00 2,370.00 2,760.00 1,380.00 500.00 1,303.50 2,200.00 $16,339.00 9,925.00 $16,339.00 36,085.00 375.00 200.00 592.50 275.00 345.00 325.88 220.00 2,000.00 7,670.00 750.00 750.00 412.50 500.00 1,750.00 8,265.00 100.00 325.00 55.00 125.00 21,750.00 46,600.00 - -- 271 .41 - - -- 0.00 - -- 49868 - -- 495.08 - -- 268.14 65.40 274.27 398.29 3,068.00 7,172.03 3,068.00 15,437.93 $2,346.41 $0.00 $4,311.18 $4,280.08 $2,318.14 $565.40 $2,371.15 $3,443.29 $62,004.03 $133,464.93 $282.50 $3,000.00 $155.38 $11,308.00 $45,232.00 $60,670.00 $2,437.14 $362.91 $4,795.30 $4,693.39 $2,872.59 $5,581.56 $2,637.42 $23,733.30 $108,425.56 $230,446.05 $0.00 $2,437.14 $362.91 $4,795.30 $4,693.39 $2,872.59 $5,581.56 $2,637.42 $23,733.30 $108,425.56 $230,446.05 ($4,610.14) $238.30 ($3,058.13) ($14,365.28) ($1,101.87) $542.70 $2,640.54 $3,610.07 $125,935.43 $164,604.66 $32,900.00 $53,050.00 $7,047.28 $124.61 $7,853.43 $19,058.67 $3,974.46 $5,038.86 ($3.12) $20,123.23 ($50,409.87) $12,791.39 ($3,457.61) ($2,293.60) ($10,773.96) ($826.40) ($38,019.83) $3.12 $50,409.87 $116,300.62 $3,589.67 $124.61 $5,559.83 $8,284.71 $3,148.05 $5,038.86 ($0.00) $20,123.23 $0.00 $91,072.18 $398.85 $3.46 $277.99 $202.07 $57.24 $25.19 ($0.00) $22.58 N/A $398.88 $3.48 $277.90 $202.04 $57.24 $25.20 $0.00 $22.58 N/A SARATOGA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LLA -1 A N N U A L A S S E S S M E N T S ZONE DATE 80 -81 81 -82 82 -83 83 -84 84 -85 85 -86 86 -87 87 -88 88 -89 89 -90 90 -91 91 -92 92 -93 93 -94 94 -95 . CREATED 0 (7C) 4/16/80 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $102.01 $92.50 $92.58 $56.80 $21.02 $34.56 $35.38 $21.60 $21.66 $21.66 $14.64 $73.56 $49.72 $72.64 (1) 1 4/16/80 $34.26 $10.54 $0.00 $10.90 $6.80 $203.76 $207.82 $113.70 $113.54 $105.94 $95.12 $101.54 $62.20 $90.32 $85.62 2 4/16/80 $11.30 $5.62 $6.16 $6.62 $7.86 $8.86 $35.14 $27.40 $29.66 $32.00 $34.62 $36.50 $5.98 $18.15 $130.80 3 4/16/80 $4.76 $4.46 $0.00 $0.00 $4.20 $11.60 $8.70 $20.50 $23.06 $46.82 $13.14 $15.36 $25.80 $45.21 $26.86 4 4/16/80 $20.95 $18.54 $0.00 $2.06 $2.30 $5.86 $6.70 $2.26 $1.86 $1.86 $1.60 $2.10 $23.84 $0.00 $0.00 5 4/16/80 $23.52 $21.28 $2.12 $0.84 $1.24 $5.00 $6.56 $5.14 $4.98 $4.98 $6.24 $6.40 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6 4/16/80 $42.03 $36.68 $0.00 $15.68 $11.32 $14.78 $16.94 $10.54 $10.60 $10.60 $8.62 $8.58 $0.00 $0.00 $25.40 7 (7R) 4/16/80 $10.41 $8.90 $6.66 $5.78 $2.54 $2.50 $3.32 $3.14 $2.64 $2.64 $3.78 $4.26 $6.88 $0.00 $10.88 8 (VPD #1) 4/16/80 $269.07 $48.26 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $213.80 $341.32 $330.36 $117.20 $0.00 $133.36 $0.00 $0.00 (1) 9 5/4/83 $65.00 $84.86 $83.52 $90.82 $87.40 $113.74 $157.20 $136.74 $144.82 $138.82 $161.30 $169.92 10 4/18/84 $1,416.00 $0.00 $167.34 $186.26 $234.70 $435.80 $348.74 $385.38 $371.12 $326.17 $456.00 11 4/18/84 $14.32 $5.66 $8.38 $7.70 $8.04 $8.76 $9.58 $10.72 $11.32 $15.48 $19.60 12 4/17/85 $172.00 $153.02 $154.16 $168.04 $188.04 $209.84 $222.60 $24242 $203.01 $398.88 13 4/17/85 $18.00 $5.24 $3.04 $3.60 $3.60 $3.70 $3.16 $0.00 $0.00 $3.48 14 4/17/85 $142.10 $121.30 $107.04 $114.48 $152.48 $137.56 $148,72 $192.74 $110.10 $277.90 15 4/17/85 $222.00 $170.76 $87.44 $83.76 $126.18 $10260 $100.72 $98.90 $227.39 $202.04 16 4/16/86 $2,376.44 $3.04 $3.22 $3.22 $59.88 $40.56 $45.16 $42.58 $57.24 17 4/15/87 $10.00 $7.70 $7.70 $8.72 $8.66 $0.00 $5.06 $25.20 18 4/15/87 $50.00 $6.08 $13518 $154.56 $164.94 $88.10 $0.00 $0.00 19 (VPD #2) 4/19/89 $1,851.00 $1,520.30 $5,243.00 $6,969.76 $13,620.00 (1) 20 (VPD #3) 4/19/89 $6,412.00 $6,414.00 $14,09200 $18,770.62 $21,252.35 (1) 21 (VPD #4) 4/19/89 $0.00 $977.78 $2,933.00 $5,406.00 $14,385.56 (1) 22 4/17/91 $36.00 $0.00 $13.21 $22.58 23 5/1/91 $110.00 (2) 24 8/3/94 $0.00 (1) - Zones 0, 8, 19, 20 & 21 merged to create Zone 24. (2) - Zone dissolved on 5/20/92. C:1WKI,LLA- SUM.WKt Landscaping & Lighting Assessment District LLA -1 - Zone 24 --------------------------------------------------------- APN Parcel Size Land Use Use Factor 8 . Area �9 W htd. Area 9 Assigned 9 On Site Net Admin. Street Parkin Total ------------------------------------------------------------------- (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) Spaces Spaces Spaces Assessment Assessment Assessment Assessment 503-24 -008 503 -24 -009 4,125 4,464 2.0 2,160 4,320 8.8 5 --------------------------------------------- 3.8 $6.91 $54.64 $337.28 $398.83 503 -24 -020 1,463 1.0 1,800 1.600 3.7 2 1.7 $6.91 $59.13 $147.88 $213.92 503 -24 -023 8,250 1.0 456 5.280 456 3,960 0.9 0.9 $6.91 $19.38 $82.12 $108.41 8.1 8 0.1 $6.91 $109.27 $8.03 $124.21 1.0 2,640 2,640 0.5 2,640 1,320 503 -24 -027 503 -24 -029 2,987 4,770 1.0 988 988 2.0 2.0 $6.91 $39.56 $177.93 $224.40 4,760 3,570 7.3 7.3 $6.91 $63.18 $642.91 $713.00 1.0 2,380 2,380 0.5 2,360 1,190 503 -24 -030 503 -24 -034 4,450 22,500 1.0 2,112 2,112 4.3 4.3 $6.91 $58.94 $380.35 $446.20 503 -24 -043 6,258 0.0 0.5 1,755 2,112 0 1,056 0.0 2.2 0.0 $6.91 $298.02 $0.00 $304.93 503 -24 -045 4,212 0.5 4,730 2,365 4.8 2.2 4.8 $6.91 $6.91 $82.89 $55.79 $190.17 $425.91 $279.97 503 -24 -046 29,185 0.5 43,750 21,875 44.7 39 5.7 $6.91 $386.57 $501.96 $488.61 $895.44 503 -24 -049 503 -24 -050 8,620 5,685 0.0 1,105 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $116.62 $0.00 $123.73 2,300 1,380 2.8 2.8 $6.91 $75.30 $248.52 $330.73 0.5 1,840 920 1.0 460 460 503 -24 -051 6,384 1,500 1,750 3.6 3.6 $6.91 $84.56 $315.15 $406.62 2.0 500 1,000 1.0 500 500 0.5 500 250 503 -24 -054 503 -24 -057 3,900 3,920 1.0 4,560 4,560 9.3 9.3 $6.91 $51.66 $821.20 $879.77 503 -24 -058 12,194 0.5 1.0 2.178 9,563 1,089 9,563 2.2 2.2 $6.91 $51.92 $196.12 $254.95 503 -24 -059 1,910 2.0 1,918 3,836 19.5 7.6 19.5 $6.91 $161.51 $1,722.18 $1,890.60 503 -24 -060 567 0.0 0 0 7.8 $6.91 $25.30 $690.82 $723.03 503 -24 -061 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $7.51 $0.00 $14.42 503 -24 -062 3,870 1.0 1,217 0 1,217 0.0 2.5 0.0 2.5 $6.91 $6.91 $0.00 $51.26 $0.00 $219.17 $6.91 503 -24 -063 4,350 4,400 3,300 6.7 6.7 $6.91 $57.62 $594.29 $277.34 $658.82 1.0 2,200 2,200 0.5 2,200 1,100 503 -24 -064 503 -24 -066 4,300 4,203 0.5 3,500 1,750 3.6 3.6 $6.91 $56.96 $315.15 $379.02 503 -24 -067 6.050 2.0 5,564 11,128 22.7 22.7 $6.91 $55.67 $2,004.02 $2,066.60 7,312 10,054 20.5 20.5 $6.91 $80.13 $1,810.60 $1,897.65 2.0 3,656 7,312 1.0 1,828 1,828 0.5 1,828 914 503 -24 -068 503 -24 -070 0 3,684 0.0 2.0 0 5,756 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $0.00 $0.00 $6.91 503 -24 -071 1,966 0.0 3,520 11,512 0 23.5 23.5 $6.91 $48.80 $2,073.17 $2,128.88 503 -24 -072 2.600 1,900 2,375 0.0 4.9 0.0 $6.91 $26.04 $0.00 $32.95 4.9 $6.91 $34.44 $427.71 $469.06 0.5 950 475 2.0 950 1,900 503 -24 -073 2,536 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $33.59 $0.00 $40.50 503 -25 -003 503 -25 -007 3,200 4,506 0.0 1,225 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $42.39 $0.00 $49.30 503 -25 -008 2.858 1.0 3.372 3,372 6.9 6.9 $6.91 $59.68 $607.26 $673.85 4,090 6,953 14.2 14.2 $6.91 $37.86 $1,252.15 $1,296.91 2.0 3,272 6,544 0.5 818 409 503 -25 -012 503 -25 -013 11,805 12,000 0.5 1,980 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $156.36 $0.00 $163.27 503 -25 -014 10,000 0.0 0.0 1.078 787 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $158.95 $0.00 $165.86 503 -25 -015 20.000 0.5 2,500 0 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $132.45 $0.00 $139.36 503 -25 -016 20.000 0.0 864 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $264.91 $0.00 $271.82 503 -25 -022 8,562 0.5 2,554 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $264.91 $0.00 $271.82 503 -25 -025 11,400 9.152 11,440 0.0 23.4 0.0 $6.91 $113.41 $0.00 $120.32 2.0 4,576 9,152 23.4 $6.91 $151.00 $2,060.20 $2,218.11 0.5 4,576 2.288 503 -25 -026 503 -25 -028 5,400 17,750 0.5 7,936 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $71.53 $0.00 $78.44 16,040 16,040 32.8 32.8 $6.91 $235.11 $2,888.61 $3,130.62 0.5 8,020 4,010 2.0 4,010 8,020 1.0 4,010 4,010 503 -25 -029 503 -25 -032 53,405 10,058 0.0 1,032 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $707.37 $0.00 $714.28 503 -25 -033 15.225 2.0 0.0 12,315 10,819 24,630 50.3 16 34.3 $6.91 $133.22 $3,025.32 $3,165.45 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $201.66 $0.00 $208.57 503 -67 -001 503 -67 -002 6.940 6,940 0.0 2,688 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $91.92 $0.00 $98.83 503 -67 -003 6,940 0.0 0.0 1,018 1,080 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $91.92 $0.00 $98.83 503 -67 -004 6,940 0.0 1.075 0 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $91.92 $0.00 $9883 503 -67 -005 6,940 0.0 979 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $91.92 $0.00 $98.83 503 -67 -006 6.940 0.0 1,151 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $91.92 $0,00 $98.83 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $91.92 $0.00 $98.83 503 -76 -001 503 -76 -002 8.000 2.541 0.5 1,190 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $105.96 $0.00 $112.87 503 -76 -003 2.541 0.0 0.0 1.665 1,482 0 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $33.66 $0.00 $40.57 503 -76 -004 2,541 0.0 1,482 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $33.66 $0.00 $40.57 503 -76 -005 2,542 0.0 1,665 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $33.66 $0.00 $40.57 503 -76 -006 2.541 0.0 1,665 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $33.67 $0.00 $40.58 503 -76 -007 2.541 0.0 1,665 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $33.66 $0.00 $40.57 503 -76 -008 2.541 0.0 1,665 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $33.66 $0.00 $40.57 503 -76 -009 2.542 0.0 1,482 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $33.66 $0.00 $40.57 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $33.67 $0.00 $40.58 517 -06 -004 2,500 0.5 824 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $33.11 $0.00 $40.02 517 -08 -005 5,000 0.5 970 485 1.0 1.0 $6.91 $66.23 $87.34 $160.48 517- 08-008 11,250 1.0 3,070 3,070 6.3 6 0.3 $6.91 $149.01 $24.03 $179.95 517 -08 -009 13,200 0.0 984 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $174.84 $0.00 $181.75 517 -08 -010 7,500 0.0 4,698 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $99.34 $0.00 $106.25 517 -OB -011 7,011 1.0 3,629 3,629 7.4 2 5.4 $6.91 $92.86 $477.26 $577.03 517 -06 -012 7,779 0.0 1,416 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $10304 $0.00 $109.95 517 -08 -048 30,000 0.5 5,588 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $397.36 $0.00 $404.27 517 -09 -011 8,250 4,420 4,970 10.2 10 0.2 $6.91 $109.27 $13.64 $129.82 1.0 2,220 2,220 2.0 1,100 2,200 0.5 1,100 550 517 -09 -012 8,250 2.0 4,500 9,000 18.4 11 7.4 $6.91 $109.27 $651.25 $767.43 517 -09 -013 16,500 0.5 5,280 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $218.55 $0.00 $225.46 517 -09 -014 8,250 3,000 2.500 5.1 5 0.1 $6.91 $109.27 $9.52 $125.70 1.0 2,000 2,000 0.5 1,000 500 517 -09 -015 42,498 31,831 30,239 61.8 47 14.8 $6.91 $562.90 $1,303.09 $1,872.91 1.0 19,098 19,096 0.5 9,550 4,775 2.0 3,183 6,366 517 -09 -017 4,006 2.0 1,600 3,200 6.5 1 5.5 $6.91 $53.06 $488.14 $548.11 517 -09 -018 5,492 1.0 1,225 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $72.74 $0.00 $79.65. 517 -09 -020 26,175 0.5 5,338 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $346.70 $0.00 $353.61 517 -09 -021 6,075 0.5 2,564 1,282 2.6 1 1.6 $6.91 $80.47 $142.73 $230.11 517 -09 -037 8,476 0.0 682 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $112.27 $0.00 $119.18 517 -09 -042 12,150 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $160.93 $0.00 $167.84 517 -09 -043 4,035 1.0 3,920 3,920 8.0 8.0 $8.91 $53.45 $705.94 $766.30 517 -09 -044 7,783 1.0 4,272 4,272 8.7 8.7 $6.91 $103.09 $769.33 $879.33 517 -09 -046 3,145 0.5 2,940 1,470 3.0 3.0 $6.91 $41.65 $264.73 $313.30 517 -09 -047 3,371 0.5 3,600 1,800 3.7 3.7 $6.91 $44.65 $324.16 $375.72 517 -09 -058 9.636 6,440 8,855 18.1 18.1 $6.91 $127.63 $1,594.68 $1,729.22 2.0 3,220 6,440 1.0 1,610 1,610 0.5 1,610 805 517 -09 -059 3,741 2.0 2,715 5,430 11.1 11.1 $6.91 $49.55 $977.88 $1,034.34 517 -09 -060 5,532 3,150 4,725 9.7 9.7 $6.91 $7327 $850.91 $931.10 2.0 1,575 3,150 1.0 1,575 1,575 517 -09 -061 14,515 2.0 4,663 9,326 19.1 18 1.1 $6.91 $192.26 $92.98 $292.15 517 -09 -068 28,050 21,574 31,047 63.4 63.4 $6.91 $371.53 $5,591.18 $5,969.63 2.0 10,473 20,946 1.0 9,101 91101 0.5 2,000 1,000 517 -09 -069 11,984 10,893 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $158.73 $0.00 $165.64 0.5 7,262 3,631 1.0 3,631 3,631 517 -09 -071 2.800 0.5 1,750 875 1.8 1.8 $6.91 $37.09 $157.58 $201.57 517 -29 -001 3,363 0.0 1,276 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -002 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -003 3,363 0.0 1,232 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -004 3,363 0.0 1,276 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51,45 517 -29 -005 3,363 0.0 1,232 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -006 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -007 3,363 0.0 1,276 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -008 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -009 3,363 0.0 1,232 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -010 3.363 0.0 1,276 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -011 3,363 0.0 1,232 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -012 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -013 3.363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -014 3.363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -015 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -016 3.363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -017 3,363 0.0 1,276 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -018 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -019 3,363 0.0 1,232 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -020 3,363 0.0 1,276 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -021 3,363 0.0 1,232 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -022 3,363 0.0 1.408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0,00 $51.45 517 -29 -023 3,363 0.0 1,276 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51,45 517 -29 -024 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -025 3,363 0.0 1,232 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -026 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -027 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -028 3.363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 517 -29 -029 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 868.223 410,104 323,628 610 171 439 ----------------- $822.29 $11500.00 $38,692.51 $51,014.80 CAZONE24.WK1 City of Saratoga Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District LLA -1 Fiscal Year 94 -95 Proposed Activities Within Each Zone Zone 1 - (Manor Drive Landscape District) - Provides for monthly landscape maintenance of the Manor Drive medians. Zone 2 - (Fredericksburg Landscape District) - Provides for monthly landscape maintenance along Cox Avenue and Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road adjacent to the Blue Meadows Court, Sumner Drive and Fredericksburg Drive neighborhoods (Tracts 3077, 4041, 4042 and 5944). Shared with Zone 9. $565 is allocated for irrigation system upgrades. Zone 3 - (Greenbriar Landscape District) - Provides for monthly landscape maintenance of the entryway to the Greenbriar neighborhood at Cox Avenue /Seagull Way and of the frontage area of the Azule Park site along Goleta Avenue. Zone 4 - (Quito Lighting District) - Provides for streetlighting in the El Quito Park area. Zone 5 - ( Azule Lighting District) - Provides for streetlighting in the Azule Crossing area. Zone 6 - (Sarahills Lighting District) - Provides for streetlighting in the Sarahills Drive and a portion of the Russell Lane areas. Zone 7 - (Village Residential Lighting District) - Provides for streetlighting in the residential areas surrounding Saratoga Village. Zone 9 - (Meadowbrook Landscape District) - See Zone 2. Zone 10 - (Tricia Woods Landscape District) - Provides for monthly landscape maintenance along the easterly side of Saratoga- Sunnyvale Road between Miljevich Drive and Blauer Drive adjacent to Tracts 6199, 7495 and 7928. Shared with Zones 14 and 18. $565 is allocated for irrigation system upgrades. Zone 11 (Arroyo de Saratoga Landscape District) - Provides for monthly maintenance of the common area landscaping belonging to the Arroyo de Saratoga neighborhood at Saratoga Avenue and Via Monte Drive. Landscaping and Lighting District LLA -1 Activities by Zone Page 2 Zone 12 - ( Leutar Court Landscape District) - Provides for monthly landscape maintenance along the SPRR right -of -way in the Leutar Court neighborhood, Tract 6996. Zone 13 - (Cabernet Landscape District) - Provides for periodic landscape maintenance and improvements along the Obrad Drive entry and the San Palo Court border area adjacent to Tract 7655. Zone 14 - (Cunningham Place Landscape District) - See Zone 10. Zone 15 - (Bonnet Way Landscape District) - Provides for monthly landscape maintenance along Bonnet Way. Zone 16 - (Beauchamps Landscape District) - Provides for landscaping and lighting of the entry to the Beauchamps subdivision at Beauchamps Lane and Prospect Road. Zone 17 - ( Sunland Park Landscape District) - Provides for semi- annual landscape maintenance along Quito Road between Baylor Avenue and McCoy Avenue adjacent to the Sunland Park neighborhood. $3,000 is allocated to develop a landscaping theme and plan to be installed in Fiscal Year 95 -96. Zone 18 - (Glasgow Court Landscape District) - See Zone 10. Zone 22 - (Prides Crossing Landscape District) - Provides for periodic landscape maintenance along Prospect Road between the Route 85 overcrossing and Titus Avenue and along Cox Avenue between the Route 85 overcrossing and Saratoga Creek. $10,000 is allocated for tree maintenance along Prospect Road. Zone 24 - (Village Commercial Landscape and Lighting District) - Provides for routine maintenance of Village Parking Districts 1 -4, Big Basin Way landscaping and street lighting along Big Basin Way. $45,000 is allocated for tree maintenance, new landscaping, irrigation system and trash enclosures in Parking District No. 1, resealing and restriping Parking Districts 1 and 2, miscellaneous repairs in Parking District 3, and tree trimming along Big Basin Way. 1� lio NO IMMUMMul 11W.-O todilmom"".1 11, _ Landscaping & Lighting Assessment District LLA -1 - Zone 24 APN Parcel Size Land Use Use Factor Bldg. Area Wghtd. Area Assigned On Site Net Admin. Street Parking Total -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) Spaces Spaces Spaces Assessment Assessment Assessment Assessment 503-24 -008 4,125 2.0 2,160 4,320 10.9 5 5.9 $6.91 $54.64 $518.07 $579.61 503 -24 -009 4,464 1.0 1,800 1,800 4.5 2 2.5 $6.91 $59.13 $223.21 $289.24 503 -24 -020 1,463 1.0 456 456 1.1 1.1 $6.91 $19.38 $101.20 $127.49 503 -24 -023 8,250 1.0 2,640 2,640 6.6 5 1.6 $6.91 $109.27 $145.21 $261.40 503 -24 -027 2,987 0.5 1.0 2,640 988 1,320 988 3.3 2.5 3 0.3 $0.00 $28.54 $28.54 503 -24 -029 4,770 1.0 2,380 2,380 6.0 2.5 6.0 $6.91 $6.91 $39.56 $63.18 $219.27 $528.21 $265.75 $598.30 503 -24 -030 4,450 0.5 1.0 2,380 2,112 1,190 2,112 3.0 5.3 3.0 $0.00 $264.10 $264.10 503 -24 -034 22,500 0.0 1,755 0 0.0 5.3 $6.91 $58.94 $468.73 $534.58 503 -24 -043 6,258 0.5 2,112 1,056 2.7 0.0 2.7 $6.91 $6.91 $298.02 $82.89 $0.00 $234.36 $304.93 503 -24 -045 4,212 0.5 4,730 2,365 6.0 6.0 $6.91 $55.79 $524.88 $324.16 $587.58 503 -24 -046 29,185 0.5 43,750 21,875 55.1 39 16.1 $6.91 $386.57 $1,417.40 $1,810.88 503 -24 -049 8,820 0.0 1,105 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $116.82 $0.00 $123.73 503 -24 -050 5,685 0.5 1,840 920 2.3 2.3 $6.91 $75.30 $204.18 $286.39 503 -24 -051 6,384 1.0 2.0 460 500 460 1,000 1.2 2.5 1.2 $0.00 $102.09 $102.09 2.5 $6.91 $84.56 $221.94 $313.41 1.0 500 500 1.3 1.3 $0.00 $110.97 $110.97 503 -24 -054 3,900 0.5 1.0 500 4,560 250 4,560 0.6 11.5 2 0.6 $0.00 $55.48 $55.48 503 -24 -057 3,920 0.5 2,178 1,089 2.7 9.5 2.7 $6.91 $6.91 $51.65 $51.92 $835.75 $241.69 $894.32 $300.52 503 -24 -058 12,194 1.0 9,563 9,563 24.1 24.1 $6.91 $161.51 $2,122.38 $2,290.80 503 -24 -059 1,910 2.0 1,918 3,836 9.7 9.7 $6.91 $25.30 $851.35 $88,3.56 503 -24- 060 567 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $7.51 $0.00 $14.42 503 -24 -061 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $0.00 $0.00 $6.91 503 -24 -062 3,870 1.0 1,217 1,217 3.1 3.1 $6.91 $51.26 $270.10 $328.27 503 -24 -063 4,350 1.0 2,200 2,200 5.5 2 3.5 $6.91 $57.62 $311.98 $376.51 503 -24 -064 4,300 0.5 0.5 2,200 3,500 1,100 1,750 2.8 4.4 2.8 $0.00 $244.13 $244.13 503 -24 -066 4,203 2.0 5,564 11,128 28.0 2 2.4 28.0 $6.91 $6.91 $56.96 $55.67 $212.11 $2,469.71 $275.97 $2,532.29 503 -24 -067 6,050 2.0 3,656 7,312 18.4 18.4 $6.91 $80.13 $1,622.80 $1,709.84 1.0 1,828 1,828 4.6 4.6 $0.00 $405.70 $405.70 503 -24 -068 0 0.5 0.0 1,828 914 2.3 2.3 $0.00 $202.85 $202.85 503 -24 -070 3.684 2.0 0 5,756 0 11,512 0.0 29.0 0.0 29.0 $6.91 $6.91 $0.00 $48.80 $0.00 $2,554.93 $6.91 $2,610.64 503 -24 -071 1,966 0.0 3,520 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $26.04 $0.00 $32.95 503 -24 -072 2,600 0.5 950 475 1.2 1.2 $6.91 $34.44 $105.42 $146.77 503 -24 -073 2,536 2.0 0.0 950 0 1,900 4.8 4.8 $0.00 $421.68 $421.68 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $33.59 $0.00 $40,50 503 -25 -003 3,200 0.0 1,225 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $42.39 $0.00 $49.30 503- 25-007 4,506 1.0 3,372 3,372 8.5 8.5 $6.91 $59.68 $748.37 $814.96 503 -25 -008 2,858 2.0 3,272 6,544 16.5 16.5 $8.91 $37.86 $1,452.35 $1,497.12 503 -25 -012 11,805 0.5 0.5 818 1,980 409 990 1.0 2.5 2.5 1.0 0.0 $6.91 $0.00 $156.36 $90.77 $0.00 $90.77 503 -25 -013 12,000 0.0 1,078 0 0.0 0.0 $8.91 $158.95 $0.00 $163.27 $165.86 503 -25 -014 10,000 0.0 787 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $132.45 $0.00 $139.36 503 -25 -015 20,000 0.5 2,500 1,250 3.1 3.1 0.0 $8.91 $264.91 $0.00 $271.82 503 -25 -016 20.000 0.0 864 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $284.91 $0.00 $271.82 503 -25 -022 8,562 0.5 2,554 1,277 3.2 3.2 0.0 $6.91 $113.41 $0.00 $120.32 503 -25 -025 11,400 2.0 4,576 9,152 23.0 23.0 $6.91 $151.00 $2,031.16 $2,189.07 503 -25 -026 5,400 0.5 0.5 4,576 7,936 2,288 3,968 5.8 10.0 10 5.8 $0.00 $507.79 $507.79 503 -25 -028 17,750 0.5 8,020 4,010 10.1 0.0 10.1 $6.91 $6.91 $71.53 $235.11 $0.00 $889.97 $78.44 $1,131.98 2.0 4,010 8,020 20.2 20.2 $0.00 $1,779.93 $1,779.93 503 -25 -029 53,405 1.0 0.0 4,010 1,032 4,010 0 10.1 10.1 $0.00 $889.97 $889.97 503 -25 -032 10,058 2.0 12,315 24,630 0.0 62.0 14 0.0 48.0 $6.91 $6.91 $707.37 $133.22 $0.00 $4,232.34 $714.28 $4,372.47 503 -25 -033 15,225 0.0 10,819 0 0.0 0 0.0 $6.91 $201.66 $0.00 $208.57 503 -67 -001 6,940 0.0 2,688 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $91.92 $0.00 $98.83 503 -67 -002 6,940 0.0 1,018 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $91.92 $0.00 $98.83 503 -67 -003 6,940 0.0 1,080 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $91.92 $0.00 $98.83 503 -67 -004 6,940 0.0 1,075 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $91.92 $0.00 $98.83 503 -67 -005 6,940 0.0 979 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $91.92 $0,00 $98,83 503 -67 -006 6,940 0.0 1,151 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $91.92 $0.00 $98,83 503 -76 -001 8,000 0.5 1,190 595 1.5 1.5 0.0 $6.91 $105.96 $0.00 $112.87 503 -76 -002 2,541 0.0 1,665 0 0.0 0 0.0 $6.91 $33.66 $0.00 $40.57 503 -76 -003 2.541 0.0 1,482 0 0.0 0 0.0 $6.91 $33.66 $0.00 $40.57 503 -76 -004 2,541 0.0 1,482 0 0.0 0 0.0 $6.91 $33.66 $0,00 $40,57 503 -76 -005 2,542 0.0 1,665 0 0.0 0 0.0 $6.91 $33.67 $0.00 $40.58 503 -76 -006 2.541 0.0 1,665 0 0.0 0 0.0 $6.91 $33.66 $0.00 $40.57 503 -76 -007 2,541 0.0 1,665 0 0.0 0 0.0 $6.91 $33.66 $0,00 $40.57 503 -76 -008 2,541 0.0 1,665 0 0.0 0 0.0 $6.91 $33.66 $0.00 $40.57 503 -76 -009 2.542 0.0 1,482 0 0.0 0 0.0 $6.91 $33.67 $0.00 $40.58 517 -08 -004 517 -08 -005 517 -08 -008 517 -08 -009 517 -OB -010 517 -OB -011 517 -08 -012 517 -OB -048 517 -09 -011 517 -09 -012 517 -09 -013 517 -09 -014 517 -09 -015 517 -09 -017 517 -09 -018 517 -09 -020 517 -09 -021 517 -09 -037 517 -09 -042 517 -09 -043 517 -09 -044 517 -09 -046 517 -09 -047 517 -09 -058 517 -09 -059 517 -09 -060 517 -09 -061 517 -09 -068 517 -09 -069 517 -09 -071 517 -29 -001 517 -29 -002 517 -29 -003 517 -29 -004 517 -29 -005 517 -29 -006 517 -29 -007 517 -29 -008 517 -29 -009 517 -29 -010 517 -29 -011 517 -29 -012 517 -29 -013 517 -29 -014 517 -29 -015 517 -29 -016 517 -29 -017 517 -29 -018 517 -29 -019 517 -29 -020 517 -29 -021 517 -29 -022 517 -29 -023 517 -29 -024 517 -29 -025 517 -29 -026 517 -29 -027 517 -29 -028 517 -29 -029 2,500 5,000 0.5 0.5 824 970 412 485 1.0 1 0.0 $6.91 $33.11 $0.00 $40.02 11,250 1.0 3,070 3,070 1.2 7.7 1.2 7.7 0.0 $6.91 $66.23 $1.87 $75.01 13,200 0.0 984 0 0.0 $44.54 0.0 $6.91 $149.01 $0.00 $155.92 7,500 0.0 4,698 p 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $6.91 $174.84 $0.00 $181.75 7,011 1.0 3,629 3,629 9.1 0 3 3,363 $6.91 $99.34 $0.00 $106.25 7,779 0.0 1,416 0 0.0 3,363 6.0 8.1 $6.91 $92.86 $540.99 $640.76 30.000 0.5 5,588 2,794 7.0 0 7 0.0 $6.91 $103.04 $0.00 $109.95 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,276 0.0 $6.91 $397.36 $0.00 $404.27 8,250 1.0 2.0 2,220 1,100 2,220 2,200 5.6 5 0.6 $6.91 $109.27 $52.00 $168.18 $51.y$51.45 0.5 1,100 550 5.5 14 5 0.5 $6.91 $0.00 $47.56 $47.56 8,250 16,500 2.0 0.5 4,500 9,000 . 22.7 11 1.4 11.7 $6.91 $0.00 $109.27 $122.07 $1,027.89 $122.07 $1,144.07 8,250 1.0 5,280 2,000 2,640 2,000 6 .6 5.0 . 66 0.0 $6.91 $218.55 $0.00 $225.46 1,408 0.5 1,000 500 1.3 5 0.0 $6.91 $109.27 $3.17 $119.36 42,498 1.0 19,098 19,098 48.1 47 1.3 1.1 $6.91 $0.00 $110.97 $110.97 0.0 0.5 9,550 4,775 12.0 $51.45 12.0 0.0 $562.90 $95.96 $665.78 0.0 2.0 3,183 6,366 160 . 3,363 16.0 1,232 $0.00 $1,059.75 $1,059.75 4,006 2.0 1,600 3,200 8.1 2 6.1 0 $0.00 $1,412.85 $1,412.85 5,492 1.0 1,225 1,225 3.1 3.1 0.0 $8.91 $6.91 $53.06 $533.92 $593.89 26,175 6,075 0.5 5,338 2,669 6.7 6.7 0.0 $6.91 $72.74 $346.70 $0.00 $0.00 $79.65 8,476 0.5 0.0 2,564 682 1,282 3.2 1 2.2 $6.91 $80.47 $196.38 $353.61 $283.76 12,150 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $112.27 �•� $119.18 4,035 1.0 3,920 3,920 9.9 $6.91 0.0 $6.91 $160.93 $0.00 $167.84 7,783 1.0 4,272 4,272 10.8 $44.54 9.9 $6.91 $53.45 $869.99 $930.35 3,145 0.5 2,940 1,470 3.7 $0 10.8 $6.91 $103.09 $948.11 $1,058.11 3,371 0.5 3,600 1,800 4.5 $51.45 3.7 $6.91 $41.66 $326.25 $374.81 9,636 2.0 3,220 6,440 16.2 ---- - - - - -- 4.5 $6.91 $44.65 $399.49 $451.05 $6.91 1.0 1,610 1,610 4.1 16.2 $6.91 $127.63 $1,429.27 $1,563.81 $11,500.00 0.5 1,610 805 2.0 4.1 $0.00 $357.32 $357.32 3,741 5,532 2.0 2,715 5,430 13.7 20 . 13.7 $6.91 $0.00 $49.55 $178.66 $1,205.12 $178.66 2.0 1.0 1,575 1,575 3,150 7.9 7.9 $6.91 $73.27 $699.10 $1,261.58 $779.28 14,515 2.0 4,663 1,575 9,326 4.0 23 18 4.0 $0.00 $349.55 $349.55 28,050 2.0 10,473 20,946 .5 52.7 5.5 $6.91 $192.26 $483.26 $682.43 1.0 9,101 9,101 22.9 52.7 $6.91 $371.53 $4,648.68 $5,027.13 0.5 2,000 1,000 2.5 . 229 2.5 $0.00 $2,019.84 $2.019.84 11,984 0.5 7,262 3,631 9.1 9 0.1 $0.00 $221.94 $221.94 1.0 3,631 3,631 9.1 8 1.1 $6.91 $158.73 $12.59 $178.23 2,800 0.5 1,750 875 2.2 2.2 $6.91 $0.00 $100,73 $100,73 $37.09 $194.19 $238.19 3,363 3,363 0.0 0.0 1,276 1,408 0 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 0.0 1,232 0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,276 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,232 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,276 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,232 p 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,276 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,232 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.y$51.45 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0,00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,276 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,232 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,276 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,232 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3.363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,276 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 54 $0.00 $5145 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,232 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,408 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 3,363 0.0 1,408 0 0.0 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 ---- - - - - -- ----- - -- - - - - -- - -= == 0.0 $6.91 $44.54 $0.00 $51.45 868,223 410,104 323.628 - - - __ 815 =__= 242 =__= __ 573 =___ ___________ $822.29 $11,500.00 $50,512.53 $62,834.82 RULES FOR SPREADING ASSESSMENT The amounts to be assessed against the assessable lots or parcels of land to pay the estimated cost of the improvements, including the maintenance and servicing thereof and the costs and expenses incidental thereto, shall be based upon the estimated benefits to be derived by the various lots or parcels of land within the assessment district. The assessment for administrative costs shall be spread equally to all of the lots or parcels of land located and benefited in each zone of the assessment district. The assessment for cost of improvements, including the maintenance and servicing thereof, in Zones 1, 3 through 7, 11 through 13, 15 T through 17, 22, 25 and 26, as described in Resolution No. 94 -024, shall be spread equally to all of the lots or parcels of land located and benefited within each said respective zone of the assessment district. The assessment for cost of improvements, including the maintenance and servicing thereof, in Zone 24, as described in Resolution No. 94 -024, shall be spread as follows: Costs related to street lights and street trees shall be spread to all the lots or parcels of land located and benefited within said zone, proportional to usable parcel area. Costs related to the Village Parking District (VPD) parking lots shall be spread to all the lots or parcels of land in commercial use located and benefited within said zone, proportional to the number of parking spaces existing in the VPD parking lots that are assigned to each parcel within said zone, rounded to the nearest one tenth (0.1) of a parking space. Spaces shall be assigned by adding the total number of spaces in the VPD parking lots and the total private spaces existing on assessable parcels, distributing this sum proportionally by weighted building area, and deducting the number of private spaces, if any, from the resulting number for each parcel. Weighted building area shall be defined as actual building area multiplied by a factor dependent on parcel use, as follows: Retail = 1.0; office /service = 0.5; restaurant = 2.0. Zones 0, 2, 8 through 10, 14, 18 through 21, and 23 have been either deleted or merged with other zones. -4- t SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO. �E AGENDA ITEM 1�✓ MEETING DATE: July 6, 1994 CITY MGR. APPROVAL ORIGINATING DEPT. City Manager's Office Paula Reeve, Public Services Assistant SUBJECT: Renewal of the Household Hazardous Waste Collection Agreement with Santa Clara County for Fiscal Year 1994- 95. Recommended Motion: Authorize the City Manager to execute the annual renewal of the Agency Agreement for the Countywide Household Hazardous Waste Collection Program on behalf of the City. Approve the Agreement in an amount not to exceed $75,000 to provide service to approximately 600 Saratoga residents. Report Summary: The City of Saratoga currently participates in the Household Hazardous Waste Program which provides hazardous waste collection and disposal services and program publicity to residents of Santa Clara County. The mobile Program operates weekend drop -off collection events on a monthly basis, providing year -round access to residents of 14 cities and the unincorporated County. Fifteen collection events were held at various sites throughout Santa Clara County during F.Y. 1993 -94, and fourteen are scheduled for 1994 -95 (schedule attached). A total of 658 Saratoga households took part in the program in fiscal 1993 -94, resulting in a greater number of participants than any other agency Countywide, except the City of San Jose. Thus, Saratogans accounted for 14% of all users, although Saratoga represents only 2% of the County's population. A total of 477 residents participated in fiscal 1992- 93. Due to these varying annual participation levels, and one less scheduled event, an average participation level of 600 users is recommended for 1994 -95. Fiscal Impacts• • The costs forthis mandated program are recovered through the rubbish bill surcharge for integrated solid waste management and offset by funds allocated to each jurisdiction from the California Used Oil Recycling Block Grants. Based on the average cost of $125 per user, the contract limit is set at $75,000. Attachments: Proposed Agreement 1994 -95 Event Schedule Motion and Vote: SANTA CLARA COUNTY HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE DROP -OFF SCHEDULE July 1, 1994 - June 30, 1995 JULY 23, 1994 CUPERTINO AUGUST 27, 1994 SARATOGA SEPTEMBER 24, 1994 MILPITAS OCTOBER 22, 1994 MOUNTAIN VIEW DECEMBER 3, 1994 SOUTH SAN JOSE.. JANUARY 28, 1995 LOS GATOS FEBRUARY 11, 1995 CENTRAL SAN JOSE MARCH 4, 1995 MOUNTAIN VIEW MARCH 25, 1995 CAMPBELL APRIL 8, 1995 MILPITAS APRIL 29, 1995 LOS ALTOS MAY 13, 1995 NORTH SAN JOSE JUNE 3, 1995 MOUNTAIN VIEW JUNE 24, 1995 SOUTH COUNTY HHW \95SCHEDL.DOC SANTA CLARA COUNTY 6/13/94