The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03-03-1982 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA.i , E1GEi�?-)a BILL NO. �, �� Dept. Hd. -Lh�2-- DA'L'E: March 3, 1982 C. Att DEP..=, E1]T: Community Development C. Mgr. ----- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- SUBJEC: TRACT 6526 PARKER RANCH, BLACKWELL HOMES, PROSPECT ROAD, PARKER RANCH DRIVE AND BURNETT DRIVE Issue Stmmary Per the agreement between Blackwell Homes and the City, certain lots are to be combined. Reversion to acreage appears 'to be the most expeditious process, therefore, Blackwell is requesting that contigious Lots 10 &'11, 12 & 13, and 1, 2 & 3 (Lots of Tract 6526 Parker Ranch) be reverted tb acreage (become three lots) as shown on the Parcel Maps at Prospect Road, Parker Ranch Drive and Burnett Drive. All street improvements were completed under Tract 6526, Parker Ranch. Recomrendation 1. Conduct a public hearing on reversion to acreage. 2. Determine the merits of the request. 3. Staff recommends approval of the reversion to acreage subject to the appropriate findings of Section 66499.16 of the Subdivision Map Act. Fiscal ImDacts None Exhibits /Attachments 1. Proposed Parcel Map 2. Chapter 6 of the Subdivision Map Act relating to reversion to acreage 3. Letter of request from applicant Council Action 3/3: Clevenger /Watson moved to approve reversion to acreage. Passed 5 -0. the local agency for such guarantee and warrant), period nor to costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys' fees. The ]c'islative body may authorize ally of its public officers or employees to authorize release or reduction of the security ill ac- cordance witl► the conditions hcreinabove set forth and in accord- ance with such rules as it may prescribe. 66199.13. In all cases where the performance of the obligation for which the security is required is subject to the approval of another a�cncy, the local agency shall not release the security until the obli- gation is performcd to the satisfaction of such other agency. Such a�cncv shall have two mon(hs after completion of the performance of the obligation to register its satisfaction or dissatisfaction. If at the end of that period it has not registered its satisfaction or dissatisfac- tion, it shall be conclusively deemed that the performance of the obligation was dune to its satisfaction. 66- 199.9. Any liability upon the security given for the faithful per- formance of any act or a.g-recnteut shall be limited to: (a) The performance of the wort: covered by the agreement be- tween file subdivider and the legislative body or the performance of the required act. (b) The performance of any changes or alterations in such work; provided, that all such changes or alterations do not exceed 10 per- cent of the original estimated cost of the improvement. (c) Tbc guarantee and warranty of the work, for a period of one year follo%, -iii-, completion and acceptance thereof, against any dcfec- tivc work or labor done or defective materials furnished, in the per - formance of the agreement with the legislative body or die perfurm- ance of the act. (d) Costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys' fees. 66.199.10. Where the security is conditioned upon the payment to tlnc contractor, his subcontractors and to persons furnishing labor, materials or cquipnment to then► for the improvement or the perfor,n- ance of an act and takes the form of a deposit of money or negoti- able bonds, a suit to recover the amount due the claimant may be mainfained against file holder of such deposit. Where time security takes flmc foram of a surely bond, or surety bonds, the right of recovery shall be in a snit against flmc surety. Where (lie security lakes the fmrn► of au instrument of credit, the cause of action shall be against the financial institution obligating itself oil such instrument of credit. CHAPTER 6. REVERSIONS AND EXCLUSIONS . ARTICLE I. REVERSION TO ACREAGE 66199.11. Subdivided real property may be reverted to acreage i pursuant to time provisions of this article. —Go- 66499.12. Yroc, :cdings for ►eversion to acreage umcty be initiated by the legislative; body on its otvn motion or by pctilion of all of the owners of record of the real property within (lie subdivision. 66499.13. 'file petition shall be in a form► prescribed by the local agency and shall cot.tain the following: (a) Adequate evidence of title to the real pruperty within the subdivision. (b) Sufficient data to enable the legislative body to make all of the determinations and findings rcquircd by this article. (c) A final nmap Ndiich delineates dedications which will not be vacated and dedications which are a condition to reversion. (d) Such other pertinent information as may be required by the local agency. 66499.14. The le,,islative body may establish a fee for proccr,sing reversions to acreage pursuant to this article ill all aumuut which will reimburse the local agency for all costs incurred in processing; such reversion to acreage. Such fee shall be paid by the owners at the time of filing the petition for reversion to acrca,,,c, or if the proceedings for reversion to acreage arc initiated by the legislative body on its own motion shall be paid by the person or persons requcstiug the legislative body to proceed pursuant to this article before such initiation of pro- ceedings. 66499.15. A public hearing shall be held on the proposed reversion to acreage. Notice thereof shall be given in time time and manner pro- vided in Section 66431.3. 66499.16. Subdivided real property may be reverted to acreage only if the legislative body finds that: (a) Dedications or offers of dedication to be vacated or abandoned by the reversion to acreage are unnecessary fur present or prospective public: purposes; and (b) Either: (1) All owners of an interest in the real property within the sub- division have consented to reversion; or (2) None of the improvements rcquircd to be remade have been remade within hvo years from the date the final or parcel , tap was tiled for record, or within the time allowed by agrcen►cmt for 3nnpletion of the improvements, whichever is time later; or (3) No lots slmown on the final ►mmap or parcel map have been sold within five years from the date such trap was filcel for record. 66499.17. As conditions of reversion time legislative body shall require: (a) Dedications or offers of dedication necessary for the purposes specified by local ordinamce following reversion. (b) Rctention of all previously paid fees if necessary to accomplish the purposes of this division or local ordinance adopted pursuant thereto. —G1— (c) Retention of any portion of required inlprovcnncnt security or deposits if necessary to accomplish the purposes of this division of local ordinance adopted pursuant,thcrcto. 66999.13. Reversion shall be effective upon the final snap being filed for record by the county recorder, and thereupon all dedications and offers of dedication not shown thereon shall be of no further force or effect. 66999.19. When a reversion is effective, all fees and deposits shall be returned and all improvement security released, except those re- tained uursuant to Section 66499.17. 66499.20. A tax bond shall not be required in reversion pro - cccdings. 66499.20'/2. A city or county may, by ordinance, authorize a parcel neap to be filed under the provisions of this chapter for the purpose of reverting to acreage land previously subdivided and consisting; of four or less contiguous parcels under the same ownership. Any Wrap so submitted shall be accompanicd by evidence of title and nonuse or lack of necessity of any streets or casements which are to be vacated or abandoned. Any streets or casements to he left in effect after the reversion shall be adequately delineated on the map. After approval of the rcvcrsion by the Governing body or advisory agency the map shall be delivered to the county recorder. The filing of the ►nap shall constitute legal reversion to acreage of the land af- fected thereby, and shall also constitute abandonment of all streets and casements not shown on the map. The filing of tl►e map shall ::!so constitute a merger of the separate parcels into one parcel for purposes of this chapter and shall thereafter be shown as such on the assessment roll subject to.the provisions of Section 66445. Except as provided in subdivision (f) of Section 66445, on any parcel u►ap used for reverting acreage, a certificate shall appear signed and acknow- ledged by all parties having any record title interest in the land being reverted, consenting to the preparation and filing of tl►e parcel map. [Amended, Chapter 862, Statutes of 1975] G6499.203!I. Subdivided lands may be merged and resubdivided without revering to acreage by complying with all the applicable re- quiremcnls for the subdivision of land as provided by this division and any local ordinances adopted pursuant thereto. The lilintg of the filial map or parcel Wrap shall constitute legal inerging of the separate parcels into one parcel and the resubdivision of such parcel, and the real prop- erty shall (hereafter be shown Avith the new lot or parcel bo11ndarics on the assessment roll. An}' unused fees or deposits previously made pur- suant to this division pertaining to the property shall be credited pro rata towards any requirements for the same purposes which are applicable at the time of resubdivision. Any streets or casements to be left in effect after (lie resubdivision shall be adcgnately dcliucated on the map. After approval of the merger and resubdivision by the governing body or advisory agency the Wrap shall be dcliverctl to the county recorder. The filing of the map shall constitute legal merger and resubdivision of the land affected thcruby, and ,(gull ;,I,o co,t,tiurtc abandonutcnt of all streets and Casements not sh. au ,u tike ill-11). [Added, Chapter 234, Statutes of 1977] ARTICLE 2. EXCLUSIONS 66499.21. The superior court of the county ill nrhic h a subdivision is situated may cause all or any portion of the real property included within the boundaries of the subdivision to be excluded frut►► such subdivison and the recorded neap to be altered or vacated, in ac- cordance with the procedures sct forth ill this article. 66499.22. A proceeding for exclusion shall be ini(iatctl by filin-I a petition therefor in the ollices of tite count)- sursc)or and county Clerk of the county in which the subtlivi,ion or the portion thereof sought to be excluded is situated. Such pctitiou shall accurately and distinctly describe tite real properly sought to be cxeludcdl by reference $o the recorded map or by any accurate survey, shall show the monies ;nod addresses of all owners of real property it, the subdivision or %n tine portion thereof sought to be excluded as far as the s:une are known to tine petitioners, and shall set forth the reasons for -the requested exclusion. The petition shall be signed and verified by the owners of at least two- thirds of the total area of the real prop - erty sought to be excluded. 66499.23. The petition sltal:' be accoutpauicd by a new 111.11) shov- :nng the boundaries of the subdivision as it aPpcaii after the exclusion :and alteration, such new n►ap to dcsigmate as numbered or lettered parcel; those portions excluded and show the acrcage of each suet► parcel. If such map can be coi;tpilcd froin data available, alit actual field survey shall not be required. If such ina1) ntce•(s with II►c ap- proval of the county surveyor, a certificate by an engineer or surveyor shall not be required. 66499.24. Upon like filing of a petition pursuant to this article, any jude of the superior court of the county in which the real Prop- 't is situated shall ►nuke art order direclin- Ibe clerk of the court to give notice of the filing of the pctitiou. '1'hc nolicc shall be for once a week for a period .of not Icss than live cousc. uti- weeks and shall he given by publication in sonic Went ;paper of "encral circnlatiot► within tile, eounty, or if there is no nc�dspaper poblishcd (herein, by Posting in Three of the principal places in the county; 1>rucidcd that if suet► real Properly or any portion (hcrcof is situated dtilltin a city, the notice shall ltd given by publication i.n ionic newspaper of general circulation within the city, or if there is tto lie sl ;aper pobli,hcd (luc•rcin, by post- ing in three of the principal plarc% ill tile, city. Such notice shall con - lain a slatcnicnt of the nature o1 tlic g I>clitiori (getter with a direction that any person may file his w►•ittcrt objcc(ion to the pcli(ion at any time before the expiration of the time of publication or po,tin ,'. JTpon expira- tion of the tittle of publication or posting, an allid .1c it showing such publication or posting shall be filed with the clerk of the court. —62— —6. — BLACKWELL HOMES _ 4^ • P.O. BOX 817 125 EAST SUNNY OAKS AVENUE • C A M P B E L L, C A I- I F. 9 5 00 8 PH 3 7 8- 5 3 40 February 19, 1982 City of Saratoga Saratoga City Hall 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 950.70 Attention: Arjan RE: The Parker. Ranch, Unit #1 - Tract 6526 Lot #s 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 12,.,13 Dear Arjan: Blackwell Homes is.the'owner of the captioned lots at The Parker Ranch in Saratoga. By this letter, we are requesting that these lots revert to acreage as per Parcel .Maps previously submitted to you by Jennings, McDermott & Heiss, Inc. This request is per the "Stipulation for Settlement" between Blackwell Homes and the City of Saratoga which provides for Lots 1, 2 and 3 to be combined, also Lots 10.and 11 combine as well as Lots 12 and 13. The seven lots would, accordingly, end up as three lots. Yours truly, BLACKWELL HOMES J ck R. Blackwell 4 r ;$. Qq M° 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 y 0 0 (408) 867 -3438 March 9, 1982 Blackwell Homes P. 0. Box 817` 125 East Sunnyoaks Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Gentlemen: This is to inform you that the City Council-considered your request that seven (7) approved lots (Tract 6526, Lot 1, 2, 33, 10, 11, 12 and 13) be reverted to acreage into three (3) parcels at the corner of Prospect Road, Parker Ranch and Burnett Drive. After conducting a public hearing at their meeting on March 3, 1982, the City Council moved to approve your request. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact our office at 867 -3438. Sincerely, obert S. Shoo Director of Community Development RSS:cd cc: Deputy City Clerk aff O&M ° 6� 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070 (� (408) 867 -3438 March 30, 1982 Blackwell Homes P. 0. Box 817 125 East Sunnyoaks Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Gentlemen: The City Council, at their meeting on March 17, 1982, adopted Resolution No. 1067, which reverts to acreage certain lots in Tract 6526, the Parker Ranch Unit No. 1, and makes findings in support thereof. A copy of the resolution is enclosed for your files. If you have any further questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, lobert S. S ook Director of Community Development RSS:cd Enclosure cc: jDeputy City Clerk .� CITY OF SARATOGA Initial: AGENDA BILL NO. �. 3 d Dept. Hd. DATE: March 3, 1982 C. Atty DEPARTMENT: Ccmu mity Development C. Mgr. - - - - -- SUBJECT: OVERLAYING PROSPECT ROAD Issue Sumnary Project involved asphalt overlay of two areas of Prospect Road 1. at Saratoga Creek; and 2) Blaney to Titus. This project was awarded on October 21, 1981 to Sweeney and Sons, Inc. for the bid amount of $28,227.20. The final cost of the project carne to $28,040.74. Recommendation Approve final acceptance and file Notice of Completion on the above project. Fiscal Impacts Cost of Project: $28,040.74 which comes from the Capitol Improvement Budget (Account # 4222). Exhibits /Attachments 1. Final progress payment No. 3 2. Notice of Completion 3. Cost summary Council Action 3/3: Mallory /Watson moved approval of Notice of Completion. Passed 5 -0. i FFINAL PROGRESS PAYMENT N0. 3 PROJECT OvEQtaY/,vS 0R030ECr Ro40 CONTRACTOR SwE�NEY ESaNS INC. P.O. NUMBER 12668 DATE March 3, /982 :m Contract Quantity Unit Description Unit Price Contract Amount, Quantity Completion Amount Completed l- 1,310 6al. A.R. Z-38 X3, //7, 80 X 358 33 3,232, 83 ? 4,800 S. -Y. Flihr /c Mal 0,78 3,74 -4;00 4,993.33 3,894.80 ,530 Tori gsplall L'oncre fe Overlay 35.75 1,9,'947-50 532.81 '. 0 EQ. Acf u s l- Manholes rzo &ade 175.00 11-4049.00 ¢ 700.00 �. 99 _T Z.F �it/Liie S/�i0 0 Zine S�r�,o %n9 0. /0 /88.so X885 /88.50 "720 z L.F Daub /e del /ow Sf�- �p /.�g 0:14 240.80 /,720 2-40.80 590 L.F. 6 So /�c� W% ;1e S�r,;o:.�g D. /Z / 90.80 /, 590 1190.80 Z/O L.F. 8" So %o' lr/h�le Sfr�;oin D./3 27.30 210 27.30_ '. 38 Za, 7y-l-? e C - povemenA /U%arler 4,75 180.50 46 218.30 40 Ea. T ,oe O= AQ�emen��iar�er 4.75 �94,Op 63 299.25 'P R0VEa-��• 4� Total Less 10 %- 2,804.0, Sub Total '* Less Previous Payments 25104.1,q MM Arnovnt to be P -,;8 �3 � �v ' ,.j . ... ... RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO 7 -1 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE 4 ........... ....... *'*"**'* ............... ... * ........ ** ....... ..... * ...... * ...... , ........ * .... I i ................................................................................ ................................................................................ CitY -Q-f ... $Ar-W;.Q.cJA. Owner ............ STA TE OF CA 01-'ORNIJ Ss. B) .............................................. Cou it I.N. of ... $Ap:�q ... qxAr�a ................. ...... J. Wayne Dernetz, Ageul .............. * ............... ** ........... * ........................ being duly swum . ................................. J—Nayme..Dernetz .................................................. sous: Vs: Sireel Add.... cil. & .......................... day of ....................... 19 ....... .............. —* ........ ............................................................................... . ... ... RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO 7 -1 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE 4 ........... ....... *'*"**'* ............... ... * ........ ** ....... ..... * ...... * ...... , ........ * .... I i ................................................................................ ................................................................................ CitY -Q-f ... $Ar-W;.Q.cJA. Owner ............ STA TE OF CA 01-'ORNIJ Ss. B) .............................................. Cou it I.N. of ... $Ap:�q ... qxAr�a ................. ...... J. Wayne Dernetz, Ageul .............. * ............... ** ........... * ........................ being duly swum . ................................. J—Nayme..Dernetz .................................................. sous: Vs: I ant .Agenf/lhe agetil ofl* III(,- owner...... of the properly described III the f0reguin--, I ti(T. I /it . it C, -e and know the contenis thereo read the foregoing nolic f and Iliesame is truc, ofrn.v 11 -11 knoivlvd_o% Subscribed and .sworn to before me this .......................... day of ....................... 19 ....... .............. —* ........ ............................................................................... ............................................................................... Delete words in brackets if owner signs. -___ Fa'�if�iTiQSp�i�ii4Cti "'"'•" � --'�c " �•' ••. :c•- -•:CO`rt51Lh'R�Cl.4-�'' -_ —_ - rnw"' r: r: :IIPaIt.Mrr19�+w:it+.:ruZSi.+'.S �"'�'' v.• 011eRG A Y11VG pRQsprc r ROAD D4 T£: 3.1982 _ BY: Erman Dorr�y rCA4 DESCFZ /PT /Onl UVI T RICE UN /T CONTRA �17,1, COMMACT Am0u *v?. OwNm . ilmTi �'dN3T�UE'T�O AIN,p?&Atr 1 AR. 4000 Asohall ?.38 Gal. /, 310 3,117.80 1,358.33 3,232.83 z, �'a6riC M4� 0.78 S. Y. 4,800 3,74-4.00 4,993.33 3 894.80 3, AsphQ/rl CornC, Over /ay 35.75 Ton 530 !B 947.50 532,:81 19,047.96 4. Adsus7,6 ids Ao Srdole 175. Ea. 8 1,400-00 4- 700,00 5, While Skip Line Sfr p %n9 0. /0 L. F. /,885 /88.50 /,885 188.50 d'. Double Ye/ /ow S /rip %n9 40.14 L,F. /,7ZO 240.80 I,7 Z Z40.80 7. 6"S-61& While 0.12 L.F. /,590 190.80 1,590 8. 8 So /�'d G1/hV/e Siri 9 Q. 43 L. F. 210 Z Z 30 210 27.30 9. Type C Marker 4.75 Ea. 38 180.50 10, ryoe O 4,75 6a. 40 ! 90;00 63 299.ZS rO 7A 4L ; 28, 227.20 28, A 744', -___ Fa'�if�iTiQSp�i�ii4Cti "'"'•" � --'�c " �•' ••. :c•- -•:CO`rt51Lh'R�Cl.4-�'' -_ —_ - rnw"' r: r: :IIPaIt.Mrr19�+w:it+.:ruZSi.+'.S �"'�'' v.• CITY OF SARATOGA F.3E 'DAIBILL NO. 2- 3 0 DATE: March 3, 1982 DEPARTMENT:. Community Development SUBJECT: OLD WOOD ROAD STORM DRAIN Issue Sumnary Initial: Dept. Hd. C. C. Mgr. For many years a surface drainage problem has existed on Old Wood Road at Cordwood Court, not only from normal run -off but from an apparent active spring. This continual run -off has deteriorated the surface of Old Wood Road ver -y badly.. The solution to this ongoing problem is to construct an under- ground storm drain system, complete with manholes, a drop inlet, and an inter- cept drain to take care of the spring activity. This underground system would extend approximately 400 L.F. to an existing 48" R.C.P. culvert running under Old Wood Road. Recommendation Authorize advertisement for bids on March 3, 1982, with bids being received on April 1, 1982. Fiscal Impacts The Engineer's estimate for this project is $17,500.00 which includes $2000.00 for an asphalt concrete overlay to repair the deteriorated__ surface of Old Wood Road. This storm drain work would come from storm drain funds, and the overlay would come from annual overlay budget. This project was approved in the Capital Improvement Budget as Cordwood Court Storm Drain. Exhibits /Attachments A. Engineer's Cost Estimate B. Reduced Set of Plans Council Action 3/3: Jensen /Watson moved to approve request for authorization to advertise for bids. Passed 5 -0. - CITY OF SARATOGA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEER'S - ESTI MA TE OLD W000 ROAD <S'T0.4M 01?.41N 1024J6CT Name of Project Date : I-ebfilal-Z 16 ,1962 By: �orsey !TEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT /. /2 " f�a� r�fa�ce�/ Cci7Cr e% �i' 396 L. F 25.00 2. Znlercepl- Drain kv;A 6 "RM.,0 - 28 L.F. 20.00 56 0, 00 3. Sfarm Manholes 2 E4. I,250, 2,500,00 4, CalGk &,s•Z-, w Curb b'Sud`7`er 7&1;xishe' / Ea. 1.250. /, Z 50. 00 SuB -TOTAL e 3,9 60, 00 70Tr 50,00 Z 000.00 /. 4s haZrZewn -efe Ove,-Iay SUB- TOTAL= !S 460.00 SS o� TOTAL= 17 6..,... REMARKS: -- I - - - - - Sheet f A "t - '. J A �7 ff CIT:�Y OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OLD WOOD ROA® S DRAIN. CONTENTS GENERAL NOTES S H E E T, All work is to be done in accordance with these Plans .'.. COVER SHEET.' and specifications and State of California specifications LOCATION MAP ( January, 1981) , as appropriate. GENERAL NOTES' 2. All reinforced concrete Pipe shall be AST M C-76. �LEGEND 3. Contractor shall notify all utility companies prior to Vq PLAN AND PROFILE beginning work. Utilities and their locations shown on the SHEET plans are approximate and for general information only. SHEET 4. Adequate traffic warning devices shall be used at all times Le .3i;) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS as deemed necessary by the Engineer. go 5. The ,Contractor is responsible for requesting necessary inspection from the Community Development Department. 0 LEGEND Failure to request inspection may be cause for reject- Proposed Storm Drain Ion of ihe work. 6.All construction activities must be in compliance with OLD `101100D RD. Existing sanitary Sewer CAL-OSHA. Failure to do so may provide cause for Water suspension of work. The Engineer shall have authority Gas to direct termination of work for safety violations. —,E Electric• - Monument Line Telephone V. LOCA770N MAP \ \,`,,`AsOholt C6nc. Overlay 4. a —"or TO SCA /_ _= — ,BENCH MARK Al Top of cost iron drop Inlet hood left of Station 2 + 64- Old Wood Rd. Elevation: 312.16 APPROVED: DATE: ROBERT S. SHOOK DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SHEET IOF3 OLD WOOD RD. M,v s II ------ ----- 7 00 Sew Sheep 3 {vim. colys/ruciiom De/oils C, ji5.-C110I, C-C) SCALE 55 tw -1--da c —P 009 exls6ng 4d"A.CP see Ow I`' 0 040 c T. 5&cl;ol7 4-.4) -350 340- -340 q 330- -330 j 920 - -3ZO -o6A3 -310 4 7 4741 N. A 6 WW/ 0 .6 - - - - -RIW- J'CA 4 E.-.* n S C AV, iA 26. .79 '.0 _and_S_:!f Af_ ;-Z-7xfj = Curb 0, 060 ewy-wsdrai, a�_ l i k AW40 vilifent -Lma for exact C AV, iA 26. .79 t't? D O 'E -Ronk rypE j. ,v,qo.v xvL-- -r ib Cl: IT Alf 'Irwo -slewohl 61, - "_4 I SEC TION C-C. N 46 SCAT E: Z'- r-j";rrwr -J-rr, =Z-775 jq' 'Aj'wv'& we 4/0 lum,0X- 9rewlo, SCA L E:7j'- -lol- PAO- ro oew- b ck W-- a OLD WOOD ROAD STORM DRAIN A-A SECTIVAI _57h) -7 -CONSTRUCTION DETAILS- - __-.VP1C,4Z: TRENCH Noted BY: E. Dorsey SHEET30F3 _and_S_:!f Af_ 4 Curb t't? D O 'E -Ronk rypE j. ,v,qo.v xvL-- -r ib Cl: IT Alf 'Irwo -slewohl 61, - "_4 I SEC TION C-C. N 46 SCAT E: Z'- r-j";rrwr -J-rr, =Z-775 jq' 'Aj'wv'& we 4/0 lum,0X- 9rewlo, SCA L E:7j'- -lol- PAO- ro oew- b ck W-- a OLD WOOD ROAD STORM DRAIN A-A SECTIVAI _57h) -7 -CONSTRUCTION DETAILS- - __-.VP1C,4Z: TRENCH Noted BY: E. Dorsey SHEET30F3 CITY OF SARATOGA AGENDA BILL NO: a3 3 DATE: March 3, 1982 Initial. V11 Dept. Head l---Ia� City At ty DEPARTMENT: Maintenance Services City Mgr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- SUBJECT: Agreement with Saratoga Drama Group for Installation of the Lighting Booth Issue Summa The Capital Improvement Budget provides an allocation of $2,700 for the addition of a lighting booth in the Civic Theatre. In order to implement the project, an agreement is being proposed between the City and Saratoga Drama Group, representing the various theatre groups. The agreement requires plans to be approved, building permits to be obtained, compliance with inspection and requires an accounting of the expenditure of the City funds. Recommendation Approve the agreement between the City of Saratoga and the Saratoga Drama Group for installation of the Lighting Booth in the Saratoga Civic Theatre. Financial Impact The agreement calls for the budgeted sum of $2,700 to be paid to Saratoga Drama Group, representing the theatre groups, in order for the project to be implemented. Attachments /Exhibits Agreement Council Action 3/3: Mallory /Jensen moved to approve. Passed 5 -0. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SARATOGA AND SARATOGA DRAMA GROUP FOR INSTALLATION OF THE LIGHTING BOOTH IN THE SARATOGA CIVIC THEATRE The City of Saratoga agrees to allow Saratoga Drama Group, representing Saratoga Drama Group, West Valley Light Opera Association and the Community Players, to construct a lighting booth in the Saratoga Civic Theatre. Requirements are as follows: 1) Drama Group agrees to provide labor and materials to construct lighting booth as approved by City. 2) Drama Group agrees to submit construction drawings.and specifications to Community Development Department for review and obtain necessary building and electrical permits as required by Community Development Department. All permit fees shall be waived. 3) Drama Group agrees to complete within 120 days of approval of said plans, the lighting booth, to be constructed at Drama Group's sole cost and expense. 4) Drama Group agrees to comply with inspections as required by Community Development Department. 5) City agrees to contribute the sum of $2,700 to Drama Group to be used by Group to defray cost of expenses of such improvements, and payment to be made within 30 days of completion of this Agreement. 6) Within 30 days from completion of work of improvements, Drama Group shall render to the City a full and complete accounting of the expenditure of City funds for the improvement. Any City funds not used for the approved project shall be returned to the City. 7) Drama 'Group is advised that the Project is being financed by Federal Revenue Sharing Funds, and that therefore, anything to the contrary in the City's prevailing wage scale notwithstanding, if any City money is used for wages, minimum wages for laborers and other construction workers shall be as determined by the Sbcretary of Labor, a copy of which schedule for minimum wages is on file with the City of Saratoga. If any wages are paid from City funds, Drama Group is required to complete the Federal Forms stating employee and salary paid. 8) Drama Group agrees at all times of progress of work to carry with insurance carriers approved by the City, full coverage or workers compensation and public liability and property damage insurance, and to furnish the City with a certificate from said insurance carriers acknowledging full liability on account of any and all injuries to workers and others, and against all property damage caused directly or indirectly by the performance or execution of this Agreement. For Saratoga Drama Gro p a - I 8 -8A Date City Manager r_ Members of the Council: March 1, 1982 This letter is to state ny opposition to thb proposed ordinance regulating false alarms. I appreciate the need to do something but not with.the method proposed. There should be more.public input. Obiections: 1) Why should the majority be saddled with a problem created.by a careless few? 2) Why invite burglars to Saratoga, already a ripe target? 3)' It will discourage neighbors from reporting a potential burglary as they will not want to spend their neighbor's money recklessly. .4) It will increase the danger to the public since people may tend to investigate personally before calling for police and may confront burglars; a very hazardous situation as the Sheriff's Office can explain. 5) This would set a serious precedent for charges for bther police services such a prowler calls where no one is found, accident investigations, family fights, loud parties, etc. 6) The overall effect will be to decrease public safety, increase burglary, increase paperwork, and diminish respect for law enforce- ment. Remember, it is the officer's personal decision as to what was a "false alarm.' Suggestions; 1) Provide more time for public input! 2) Gather more facts before making a.decision of any kind: a. How many false alarms a year vs. number of homes in Saratoga? b. How many actual burglaries at what cost to residents? C. How many false and valid commercial alarms /hold -ups? d. How many false alarms per address per year? e. How many burglars caught in the act? f. What is the Sheriff's average response time to an alarm? g. What is the percentage of solved burglaries? h. How many burglaries were actually prevented or interupted by an alarm? 3) I agree that excessive false alarms are a serious problem and waste of resources but there must already be laws against public nuisances that might be used to control the problem. One, two or maybe even three a year would allow for such things as PG &E transients or shutoffs, sonic booms, excessive winds, or even honest mistakes that set off alarms. 4) Enact an ordinance but allow the citizens of Saratoga a fair margin for error. After all, even the Sheriff's department makes errors. Ask them about the radio system failure of a few months ago. -11 :1. In conclusion, I ask that you do not approve the proposed ordinance as written, and instead, hold a public hearing so the residents can express their opinions. I am afraid that this ordinance is just a patch on the real problem of providing adequate public safety services to the Citizens of Saratoga as money gets tighter. Respectfully, Bruce O. rdan 12679 McCartysville Place Saratoga JJ �nn Ult,�e- p ti S.cx.J c�CeS Y ma crR,� was and Wh1 w+ c? i