The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09-08-2005 Traffic Safety Commission AgendaTRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION AGENDA DATE: September 8, 2005 TIME: 6:30 PM LOCATION: Administrative Conference Room City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 Call to Order Roll Call: Ballingall, Biester, Bustamante, Kane, Guichard Report on Posting of the Agenda: Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on September 2, 2005. Accept Agenda Items and Order: No additional items may be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2. Oral &t Written Communication Any member of the public may address the Commission about any matter not on the agenda for this meeting for up to three minutes. Commissioners may not comment on the matter but may choose to place the topic on a future agenda. Approval of Draft Minutes Draft Public Safety Commission Minutes for June 9, 2005 New Business 1. Traffic Matrix #96 - Roeper -19610 Three Oaks Way (Follow up from meeting on 6/9/05) Issue: Speeding and unsafe conditions on Three Oaks Way. Action: Report from Traffic Engineer, TSC will make recommendation 2. Traffic Matrix Item #97 &t #103 - Snow &z Craig (Follow up from meeting on 6/9/05) Issue: Traffic on. Titus and Prospect, speeding and unsafe crossing Action: Report from Traffic Engineer, TSC will make recommendation 4. Traffic Matrix # 101- Miller &z Kumar (Follow up from meeting on 6/9/05) Issue: Residents want permanent radar sign on Cox Avenue Action: TSC will make recommendation 5. Traffic Matrix #102 - Lin -12750 Glen Arbor Court Issue: Wants mirror to increase site distance coming out of Glen Arbor onto Cox Action: TSC will make recommendation 6. Traffic Matrix #106 - Steve Allen, 18710 Aspesi Drive Issue: Speed bumps on Aspesi- Residents willing to pay for these Action: TSC will make recommendation 7. Traffic Matrix #107 - John Greenleaf Issue: Lack of barriers on Parker Ranch Action: Report from Traffic Engineer, TSC will make recommendation 8. Traffic Matrix #111- Julie Daniel, 12881 Pierce Road Issue: Speeding and excessive volume on Pierce Road Action: TSC will make recommendation 9. Traffic Matrix #112 -joy Tsai, 19225 Allendale Issuer Lack of site distance when coming out of residence on Allendale Action: TSC will make recommendation 10. Traffic Matrix #113 - Kiran Malhotra,13750 Surrey Lane Issue: Request for stop sign at Surrey &r Saraview, lack of site distance Action: TSC will make recommendation 11. Traffic Matrix #115 - Eric Bracher Issue: Wants 25 mph speed sign on Cox, difficult to turn out of Quito Market Action: TSC will make recommendation 12. Traffic Matrix #104 - Susan Zucca,13911 Loquat Ct. Issue: Wants Community Signs Action:. TSC will make a policy recommendation to Public Works 13. Traffic Matrix Item #99 &z #110 -Webb &r Chun Issue: Post Office will not deliver mail if there is a car parked in front of mailbox Action: TSC will make a policy recommendation to Public Works Staff Report -John Cherbone A. Project Reports • Aloha Intersection Project Announcements by Commissioners and Staff Adjournment In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a disabled person and you need a disability- related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 408.868.1269 or cboyer@saratoga.ca.us Requests must be made as early as possible and at least one full business day before the start of the meeting. Certificate of Posting of Agenda: I, Kristin Borel, Administrative Analyst for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Public Safety Commission of the City of Saratoga was posted on September 1, 2005, at the office of the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga, CA 95070 and was available for public review at that location. The agenda is also available on the City's website at www.saratoga.ca.us. Signed this 1st day of September 2005, at Saratoga, California CITY OF SARATOGA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION Draft Action Minutes DATE: June 9, 2005 TIME: 6:30 PM LOCATION: Administrative Conference Room City of Saratoga 13.77.7Fruitvale.Av.,enue, Saratoga,_CA, 95.070 1. Call to Order Chair Biester called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. 2. Roll Call: Ballingall, Biester, Bustamante, Kane, Guichard Absent: Bustamante Staff: Director Cherbone, Analyst Borel, and Traffic Engineer Rashid 3. Report on Posting of the Agenda: Borel reported that Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on June 1, 2005. . Accept Agenda Items and Order: Item 9 moved to follow Item 10, Item 10 F moved before 10A. Election of new Vice Chair moved to end to follow Item 9. 5. Election of new Vice Chair - MOTION: Nominate Guichard as Vice Chair. Motion passed 4 -0. 6. Oral &t Written Communication No oral or written communication 7. Approval of Draft Minutes MOTION: Motion made to approve the draft Traffic Safety Commission Minutes for March 10, 2005, amended as proposed. Motion passed 4 -0. 8. Discussion of New Council Direction for Commission 9. Staff Report - John Cherbone A. Project Reports • Marshall Lane / Sobey Road Traffic Safety Improvement Project • Highway 9 Safety Project • Aloha Intersection Project • Oak Street Pedestrian Improvement Project • Cox Avenue R/R Crossing Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement Project • Gateway Improvement Project B. Discussion of Bicycle, Trail &t Pedestrian Committee 10. New Business A. Traffic Matrix Item #94 - Todd -18629 Clemson Avenue: Request for speed control on Clemson (see attached map and letter) MOTION: Motion made to approve the request for a 25 mph sign to be placed on Clemson. Motion passed 4 -0. MOTION: Motion made to approve a stop sign on Clemson at Villanova. Motion denied 2-2-0,2 abstain. B. Traffic Matrix Item #95 - Vickroy -18843 Casa Blanca: Request for speed bumps and street lights on Casa Blanca, pedestrian crossing signal at Dagmar is slow to respond. Recommendation to Staff to notify this person about operation of signal and Saratoga street light policy. C. Traffic Matrix #96 - Roeper -19610 Three Oaks Way: Request for remedy to many traffic concerns (see attached letter) MOTION: Motion made to direct Staff and Traffic Engineer to obtain data that encompasses a holistic perspective of the street, and report back with a reasonable and appropriate recommendation to eliminate speeding, with a motion to amend to include Farwell Avenue. Motion passed 4 -0. D. Traffic Matrix Item #97 - Snow: Request for better crosswalk markings at Titus and Prospect (see attached letter) No action taken at this time. Staff and Traffic Engineer have a meeting with San Jose Staff about this intersection. Staff will report back at next meeting. E. Traffic Matrix Item #101- Miller -19401 Shubert Drive: Request for speed reduction on Cox, speed bumps on DeHavdland, and reduce number of crosswalks on Cox at Miller from two to one. (see attached maps and letter) Direction given for Traffic Engineer to gather data and report back at the next meeting. F. How to proceed with neighborhood traffic issues with cancellation of NTMP 11. Announcements by Commissioners and Staff 12. Adjournment at 9:15 p.m to next meeting September 8, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. City of Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission Traffic Matrix #96 Public Safety Commission Liaison 13777 Fruitvale Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 June 26, 2005 Dears ��41 Attached is a letter I mailed to, the Traffic Safety Commission in July 2001. The information contained in this letter still applies to the horrific traffic driving behaviors that exist on Three Oaks Way. Nothing became of my letter. In'fact, the unsafe driving and speeding has increased on Three Oaks due in part to the lack of a presence by the Saratoga Sheriff in this area. I call the traffic reporting line on a routine basis to report speeders, hill hoppers and scary pedestrian near misses. I plan to make my concerns heard.at a much more public level in the future and to get more Saratoga citizens involved on my street and in the community to improve the safety condition of Three Oaks Way. I would love to help in any way possible. Sincerely, To Pamela Roper Kaiser 19610 Three Oaks Way Saratoga, CA 95070 (408)741 -1805 Cell: (408)858 -3p5 0 pe'r Ka'�s e*- ale-+ MAY 2 7 2005 ary OF SARATOGA City of Saratoga Traffic Safety Commission C/O Paula Reeve Public Safety Commission Liaison 13777 Fruitvale Ave Saratoga, CA 95070 July 3, 2001 Dear Traffic Safety Commission Members, The purpose of this letter is to communicate traffic safety observations on Three Oaks Way in Saratoga. I wrote a letter similar to this approximately two years ago and also met with the, traffic safety commission at that time. As a solution to the traffic safety issues observed during .............. that time frame and, as a result of our meeting, a stop ahead symbol sign was placed on the street and tree branches were'cleared to make the speed limit and reflector signs more visible., While I think the sign may have helped to the increase awareness of an approaching stop sign (at the Fruitvale end) I think it did little to reduce the lionshare of more serious traffic safety, issues that continue to exist. f Residents on Three Oaks Way continue to observe motorist speeding, we have seen an increase, in the volume of cars (observed primarily throughout the school year) and, the "hill hopping" or trying to get a car airborne by gathering speed before the top of the hill in front of my home continues. As your traffic safety engineer may have observed, the road on Three Oaks Way is narrow. The road has no shoulder and land surfaces at the side of the road drop off in few places. Year round, on most days, many joggers, bicyclists and residents walking pets can be observed. Many are using the street as a cut through to get to the jogging path on Fruitvale Avenue or to the track at West Valley. In fact, since Three Oaks Way is the shortest direct route or cut through from Saratoga -Los Gatos Road to Fruitvale we get a lot of the Grade /Middle School and West Valley College traffic. Patrons for events at Villa Montalvo and recently the Montalvo shuttle buses have driven down the street some at speeds higher than the posted 25- mph speed limit. The following numbered line items document factual observations and safety concerns. 1. Three Oaks way is the shortest and fastest route to cut from Fruitvale to Saratoga -Los Gatos road and vice versa — cars speed on this road routinely. 2. Traffic from 8:00 am until 9:00 am during the school year is the heaviest. Traffic again picks . up about 2:15 p.m. until about 3:30 p.m. and, then can stay busy until about 6:30 p.m. 3. Youth in vehicles accelerate just prior to the top of the hill and to get their vehicles airborne. Hill hopping (or whatever term young people are currently using to depict this unsafe behavior) is prevalent mostly on weekends. This is the most dangerous observation I have experienced. 4. Youth continually drive "donuts" on the property that is to the right of Best View Court (the only private road on the left off of Three Oaks Way) if you are headed from Fruitvale Avenue direction. If the young person loses control during the fast circles they may hit a car on Three Oaks Way, hit a tree or even flip over. Neighbors on Best View Court have observed this and I have also observed this from my daughter's bedroom window. 5. Joggers and residents walking down the street have commented that they have had to get out of the way of speeding cars. They have also stated that when two cars are passing by each other from opposite directions they "take over the entire road ". Sometimes there is space to get out of the way and depending on where they are on the road the space can be quite minimal on either side — making getting out of the way quite difficult. 6. Workers putting in our landscaping from January to April 2001 continually commented on the speed of cars travelling down the street and the volume of cars. They also noted they observed "many" cars driving off the road and almost getting really close to them as they worked on landscaping along the side of the road. The most telling comment was when they said "we have worked on a lot of streets and Three Oaks Way is pretty much the scariest ". 7. Pacific Bell workers climbing up the utility pole to add some phone lines commented that the pole was really tall; however, more than having to stretch to get going on such a tall pole they were concerned about being hit while getting ready to climb up and when getting down. 8. Saratoga Public Works crew when trimming tree limbs to make the posted signs and reflector signs more visible commented that "cars sure zoom down that hill at fast rates" "we had to jump out of the way ". 9. Residents drive down the middle of the street at narrow portions of the road. 10. When two large SUVs pass each other from opposite traffic lanes more often than not one will have to stop to let the other pass (to avoid passing without side swiping side mirrors). 11. Taking out the trash cans or retrieving mail can be a dreadful endeavor. On more than one occasion cars have brushed my backside with their vehicles, I have felt the back of my blouse blow up due to the closeness of their cars and have to yield to the cars just to open my mailbox. When placing out our trash receptacles and recycling 1 have also had a few near miss situations where I had to jump out of the way of speeding cars when the driver was in a compromised situation (tending to children or talking on a cell phone). 12. Pulling out of the driveway can be tricky when cars headed down from Saratoga Los Gatos Road have gathered speed before the hill. One minute you can't see a car and the next it is right there. 13. 1 have had to wait for 16 cars to pass before exiting my driveway (during the month of May 2001). 14. You can take your foot of the gas pedal when turning onto Three Oaks Way from Saratoga' Los Gatos Road (headed from the Saratoga Village direction) and "coast" down the street at greater than the 25 mph the posted limit without touching the pedal again until just before the stop sign at Fruitvale. 15. Cars gather speed to get up the hill on Three Oaks Way (from the Fruitvale direction) and never slow down again 16. Young children cannot ride a bike or even think of walking down the Three Oaks Way road to get to Branaga Court or Best View Court without adult supervision. 17. The street is poorly lit. 18. Speed trailers posted on the street to measure car speed do not have a wide enough berth or space to be parked — especially in a logical place to measure speed at the point when cars have picked up their maximum speed. Vehicles have to slow down to avoid side swiping the trailer or another vehicle if it is passing at the same time or just prior to approaching the trailer. I have thought deeply on numerous occasions about how to improve traffic safety and have documented possible recommendations to improve the situation on Three Oaks Way. I am sure many of my recommendations would be acceptable to other residents — especially those with children. Possible Solutions and Improvement Recommendations: • Post signs to increase the awareness of playing children. • Add two more speed limit signs or move the existing signs to be more visible. I would suggest to post these closer to Saratoga -Los Gatos Road end in both directions or where it is more obvious without making the street look cluttered with signs. • Limit traffic to residents on Three Oaks Way and adjacent streets during peak traffic hours (similar to what the City of Cupertino has done in multiple locations). • Put in emergency vehicle friendly speed bumps (similar to Austin Avenue in Monte Sereno). Austin Avenue is serviced by the same Fire Station as Three Oaks. It appears that the Possible Solutions and Improvement Recommendations Continued: emergency vehicles have successfully used Austin Avenue to get down to Quito as quickly . as possible — even with their speed bumps. • Patrol the street on a frequent basis and cite speed violators —do this for at least a year to make sure the awareness sticks. Position the speed trailer to gather data once per month or at minimum quarterly to increase . awareness of speed limits. Place the trailer in' a manner to capture true data not skewed data — by this I mean in a location that does not require cars to slow down to avoid hitting the trailer. Figure out a way to add shoulder space and /or slightly widen the road (without taking more easement land away from residents). Post symbol signs. For example: ➢ Symbol sign for bicycle or pedestrian at Saratoga -Los Gatos End of Street • Post gentle reminder or narrative signs. For example: ➢ "Slow Down Children are Present" ➢ "The Road is Narrow Here — Mind Your Speed for Your Safety" ➢ "Do You Know How Fast You Are Driving ?" ➢ "Share the Road with Joggers and Bicycles ➢ "Hill Hopping Is Very Dangerous, Even Fatal" ➢ "Telephone Poles Don't Get Out of the Way" It may be difficult to post these type signs on a public road; however, data gathered from a corporate traffic safety committee I led indicated that people do read and have modified their behavior due to innovative, more eye catching gentle reminder /people friendly signs. I understand from both Sandy Thorp (Farwell Ave resident) and Paula Reeve (City of Saratoga) that Farwell and Three. Oaks Way residents are meeting with the Traffic Safety Commission on July 12, 2001 at 6:30 p.m. It would have been my preference to attend this meeting to physically voice the facts, present some of my observations and lastly to be part of a solution. I am unable ------- .- . ---- -- 4o -make- the, meeting -,- es- my- family-will -be- out- of-town- on -a-- vacation- we-pl'anned back -in October 2000. 1 am dedicated to making sure the traffic safety on both these two streets improves and would love to hear more about the outcome from this meeting. I would also like to participate in any future meetings on this topic. In closing my biggest fear is for the safety of my children. I am fearful every time they play in the driveway or in our field adjacent to Three Oaks Way. Cars have pulled into my drive way to turn around and have almost hit my children while they were playing. I am also very fearful for the youth that speed down Three Oaks Way and also "hill hop ". I have posted my own "Children at Play" sign to help in awareness. Increasing the awareness of unsafe acts and behavior and the ramification of that unsafe behavior is a very effective way to improve safety. Three Oaks Way will remain an unsafe cut through street unless the City of Saratoga takes some action to help modify the behavior of residents who inadvertently disobey speed signs and drive unsafely on this narrow road. Sincerely, Pamela Roper Kaiser' 19610 Three Oaks Way Saratoga, CA Home: (408) 741 -1805 cc: Sandy Thorp - 19550 Farwell Ave Residents on Three Oaks Way, Best View Court, Baranga Court, Three Oaks Court Pagel. of 7 Kristin Borel Traffic Matrix #97 From: John Cherbone Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 4:30 PM To: Kristin Borel Subject: FW: Roadshow -- [McAuliffe] Please Be Mindful of Walkers - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Pagatpatan, Veronica [mailto:Veronica.Pagatpatan @sanjoseca.gov] Sent: Monday,..June 06, 2005.2:55 PM ........ To: John Cherbone Subject: RE: Roadshow -- [McAuliffe] Please Be Mindful of Walkers Hi John, Yes, I would like to meet. I am available this Thursday and Friday between 8AM and 10:30AM. Please let me know what is a good time for you. We can meet at the intersection of Prospect/Titus if it is convenient. Thank you, Veronica - - - -- Original Message---- - From: John Cherbone [mailto:jcherbone @saratoga.ca.us] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 2:16 PM To: Pagatpatan, Veronica Subject: RE: Roadshow -- [McAuliffe] Please Be Mindful of Walkers Hi Veronica, At this time that would be me and our Traffic Engineer. Would you like to meet and discuss your recommendations? Just let me know and we can schedule a meeting. Thanks, John - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Pagatpatan, Veronica [mailto:Veronica.Pagatpatan @sanjoseca.gov] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 1:17 PM To: John Cherbone Subject: FW: Roadshow -- [McAuliffe] Please Be Mindful of Walkers Hi John, Do you know who I should coordinate with regarding this concern? We have reviewed the intersection and would like to discuss our recommendations for the northside of Prospect Rd which is in the City of San Jose's jurisdiction. Thank you for your help, Veronica - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Laura Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 3:35 PM To: 'John Cherbone' Cc: Pagatpatan, Veronica Subject: RE: Roadshow -- [McAuliffe] Please Be Mindful of Walkers 8/24/2005 Page 2 of 7 John, Please let Veronica know who she should coordinate with on your end. Thx Laura Wells Dept. of Transp. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: John Cherbone [ mailto :jcherbone @saratoga.ca.us] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 3:23 PM To: Richards, Gary; Wells, Laura Cc: Pagatpatan, Veronica Subject: RE: Roadshow -- [McAuliffe] Please Be Mindful of Walkers Hello All, I am scheduling our Traffic Engineer to take a look as soon as possible. Sincerely, John Cherbone Public Works Director - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Richards, Gary [ mailto :GRichards @mercurynews.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 11:42 AM To: 'Wells, Laura'; Richards, Gary Cc: John Cherbone; Pagatpatan, Veronica Subject: RE: Roadshow -- [McAuliffe] Please Be Mindful of Walkers No problem. Thanks to everyone for your help on this. Gary Richards San Jose Mercury News Roadshow line (920 -5335) direct line: 920 -5037 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wells, Laura [ mailto :Laura.Wells @sanjoseca.gov] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 10:28 AM To: 'Richards, Gary' Cc: 'jcherbone @saratoga.ca.us'; Pagatpatan, Veronica Subject: RE: Roadshow -- [McAuliffe] Please Be Mindful of Walkers Gary, I've forwarded to Veronica Pagatpatan, the engineer responsible for this area of town. She will coordinate her review of the intersection with John. Given workload issues, it will probably be later this month that we can get back to you. Laura - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Richards, Gary [mailto :GRichards @mercurynews.com] Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 5:46 PM 8/24/2005 Page 3 of 7 To: 'laura.wells @sanjoseca.gov'; 'jcherbone @saratoga.ca.us' Subject: FW: Roadshow -- [McAuliffe] Please Be Mindful of Walkers Laura, John: Can anything be done here to make the pedestrian crossing safer? Thanks Gary Richards San Jose Mercury News Roadshow line (920 -5335) direct line: 920 -5037 - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: sherry snow [mailto:swsnow @earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 7:58 PM To: mrroadshow @mercurynews.com Subject: Fwd: [McAuliffe] Please Be Mindful of Walkers Hi Gary.: Can you help the parents at Christa McAuliffe School? We are an energetic committed group and will do whatever you tell us to do to solve our problem. We need to make the corner at Titus and Prospect Road safer for pedestrian and bike traffic. I'd settle for a marked crosswalk with a big multicolored standard like I've seen outside other elementary school crosswalks (there's one at the elementary school on Blaney in Cupertino) so there is a visual cue to drivers to look for pedestrians. After I wrote my e -mail (see below) to our- school e -list about my kids' near death experience trying to cross the street, I heard from many McAuliffe elementary parents saying that they have been trying for years to do something about that corner. Larry Magee sums up the sad sorry history best. People turn right from Prospect on to Titus, they turn right from Titus onto Prospect, they turn left from Prospect to Titus and turn left from Titus on to Prospect and no one looks for the children trying to cross. By my count that's four ways a kid could get flattened trying to cross at the corner of Titus to get to the other side of the street. Everyone seems to be going 40 miles an hour on Prospect, too.. Can you review the rules of the school zone, especially along a busy, multilane street like Prospect which. has not only an elementary school but a high school along it as well. Most 8/24/2005 Page 4 of 7 people seem to think that the only time they need to go 25 mph is in the slow lane and only at 8 and 3:30 pm. Thanks for all your great work. I don't know what we're going to do if you ever get bored or decide to retire. Sincerely, Sherry Witt Snow (408)507 -2835 (cell) (650) 424 -1177 Begin forwarded message: From: "Magee, Larry (NonStop)" <lawfence.magee @hp.com> Date: April 28, 2005 9:20:38 AM PDT To: "sherry snow" <swsnow @earthlink,net> Subject: RE: [McAuliffe] Please Be Mindful of Walkers Sherry, Good luck in your quest. This message is to let you know that people have been trying to get this changed/fixed for years and have all given up. One part of the problem is jurisdictional -- one side of Prospect is San Jose and the other is Saratoga. Doing anything would involve both cities and neither one particulaly wants to get involved. Though, 8/24/2005 Page 5 of 7 my recollection is that Saratoga has been a bit more receptive in the past than San Jose (figures -- big city vs small city). Those in power who have listened have said they couldn't possibly put a light at Titus because there is already one at Johnson, just 100 yards away. The best I have heard is they couldn't possibly put a crossing guard at the crosswalk because it is too dangerous!!!! I think the other thing is that few people actually brave crossing there on foot. Andy and Becky and I are the few who regularly do it. Most of the others have tried it and given up. Anyway, good luck. Larry - - - -- Original Message---- - From: McAuliffe @yahoogroups.com [mailto :McAuliffe @yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of sherry snow Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 9:28 PM To: McAuliffe Subject: [McAuliffe] Please Be Mindful of Walkers My kids cross Titus at the corner of Prospect and Titus on their way to and from the bus stop at Johnson and Prospect. 8/24/2005 Page 6 of 7 Apparently they were almost hit on Tuesday by a vehicle turning right on to Titus from Prospect without stopping or slowing. Please remember that kids and parents are walking across that corner and there is an implied crosswalk any time two streets intersect at right angles. ........ _ ................... ... ....... .. ........... .......... ... .................... ....... Pedestrians have the right of way when they are in the crosswalk and you shouldn't turn in front or in back of pedestrians when the crosswalk is occupied. There is a school zone that extends approximately 100 yards on either side of Titus on Prospect. This means that the speed limit when school is in session is 25 mph, whether you can see kids or not. Please be very careful, especially if you drive a very tall SUV and PLEASE do not be on the cell phone while you are driving. I am going to be researching what it would take to get a painted crosswalk or a crossing guard at that corner. Yours in safe bipedal locomotion, Sherry Snow ------------------ - - - - -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ------------------ 8/24/2005 Page 7 of 7 Take a look at donorschoose.org, an excellent charitable web site for anyone who cares about public education! http://us.click.yahoo.com/IgzaND/8WnJAA/HwKMAA/e3qr]B/TN ----------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -> Yahoo! Groups Links _ _ . ......._ . .... ........... _ ..... _ . .. ....... ........ _ .. _. < *> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/I\4cAuliffe/ < *> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: McAuliffe-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com < *> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://does.yahoo.co'm/info/`terms/ 8/24/2005 Traffic Matrix #103 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION TRAFFIC COMPLAINT DATE: NAME: r1 /Ul c, ADDRESS: 2l PHONE: EMAIL: DATE SENT TO F &P: DISCUSSION SCHEDULED FOR PSC MEETING: DATE ADDED TO TRAFFIC MATRIX: c� jyfds DESCRIPTION OF TRAFFIC ISSUE: acc�den�s St�t� (R ' i hfi a�' eci' r 1 ShO %xn C'ari� s e� � ar' Wrri 5cho ergs cress iW <'ars ahG e de a ns DIAGRAM IF NEEDED: dons - Vie.. k os•e Was r�� t�n varOr`� a C rot ca w e � � C o un'� d Q r e o r ,� A C-y f a can \, s �n' .O� Du�i� e Lo �T�r;G c�?'Lc•trtr�.�f Sc�+ool �1�r�1� menu ?C cn 7� «nk- t7a��'�c`r�i`�al� c vhkEA ors kz CA cr, S�'��'• 1 era z0C h «d Fns E Dn C, ►'cam n, �� SGT �i�1 i �`-`r J GI^� • �� c. From:Fehr & Peers 408 278 1717 12/15/2004 09:10 #066 P.001 /011 1� FEHR PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS 255 N. Market Street Suite 200 San Jose, CA 95110 Phone: 408 - 278 -1700 Fax: 408 -278 -1717 Fax Transmittal Sheet Date: /2 %�S /G�' No. of Pages: , (including cover 70: �� o,,.r From: Company: Phone: Fax: T 86 7 - S SS9 Phone: Project Name; Project #: ❑ . Original will not follow Original will follow by: ❑ Regular Mail ❑ Golden State Overnight ❑ Federal Express /UPS ❑ Email ❑ Other: From:Fehr & Peers 408 278 1717 12/15%2004 09:11'#066 P.002 /011 FROM Traffic Data Servie PHONE N0. :'4083772998 Nov. 02 2004 01:16PM P2 customust -5131 Page 1 Traffic Data Service Speed Report CustornL st -5131 DATASETS: [001 M] NB T1TUS AVE: NORTH OF DRIVE dRTHAMPTON DR� Site: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Speed range: 1 -100 mph. Direction: North (bound) Headway: All Scheme: Name, Scheme F Factory default profile Method, Vehicle classtfication Units: Non - Metric (ft, mi, f /s, mph, Ib, ton) •Tue 19 Oct 204 WOO nV050 aVOE$ nV060 uV065 �� '�0 21aiv Tatal aV000 pv005 nvoio nV015 11VO20 aVO25 nV030 W035 av045 30 55 60 65 100 SO C. 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 - - - _ OODO 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0200 0 0 (i 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 n 0300 0 V. 0 0 1 1 2 0 D 0 0 0400 4 5 0 v _ 0 1 3 D �' � 22 :4 22 26 17.9 0500 13 0 0 1 6 ' 1 0 0 0 p U 25.4 27 31 27.3 0600 42 0 n .1 5 P lb 9 0 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.9 24 29 22.1 0700 0800 55 0 U 5 34 9 19 6 0 0' 0 0 0 22.2 23 $0 23.9 0900 30 U 1 S U 2 7 7 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 21.2 2U 29 11.4 1000 22 G 0 4 8 8 3 4 9 0 0 0 U O 0 22.2 23 28 19.9 1100 79 v 0 6 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 24 30 23.7 1200 46 U 0 14 n 15 7 v 0 0 0 f) U 0 23.7 23 92 22.6 1300 24 U 0 4 3 3 i 1 0 0 0 0 U 0 23.6 27 33 24.4 1400 36 U C 4 14 1 11 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.0 27 32 24.2 1goo 30 0 1 7 1 11 6 U 1 U 0 0 0 0 27.i. 29 32 24.6 1600 34 0 1 2 3 0 7"% 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 '1.x.7 26 29 22.1 17 00 31 ti 0 1 ; r. 14 5 D 0 U 0 0 0 n' v 25.0' 28 30 21.E 1000 32 0 - a 7 1? 5 0 C, 0 U n 0 0 25.4 25 29 7,0.4 1900 34 0 1, •. 1 14 12 4 1 0• 0 0 0 0 0 25.3 z4 28 19.0 2400 11 0 0 C 1 s 5 0 0 0 0 0 U o 0 26.7 23.3 2.100 5 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 U U 0 0 0 v U 0 21.3 _ - 0.3 2200 3 <i o 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 U U 0 0 35.2 - _ 5.4 2300 1 U C' p ) n u 0 63 3 2 O 0 0 0 0 24.1 26 31 24hr 477 0 3 52 95 80 160 *Wed 20 Oct 200, vo2s nv035 nV040 =V045 n60 V033 OV060 nVO65 MSS V5o Vey e v=0 Tim 2ota1 n=00 .Vo05 nv010 nV015 nV020 nvoio 55 60 65 100 10 5 10 15 20 25 30 55 40 45 90 _ 0000 0 0 u U t) v 0 0 0 o 0 o 00 0 0100 0 0 0 D 0 n 0 0 D u 0 0 0' 0 0 o D 30.2 _ _ ?O.t 0200 1 0 0 n 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 U . 0 12.3 _ _ O.G U3U0 2 ) tl U 0 3 U 0 0 0 U 0 0 16.4 ' 6 0400 1 0 0 U 7 U 0 0 0 0 0 o U 0 0 0 19.5 _ 11.4 O5o0 0 0 1 3 2 1 u 0 0 0 n 0 22.1 22 1.7 ]7.n 0e00 13 0 0 3 1 5 5 1 0 a U 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 24 7.9 22.ti 0700 33 0 C 1 4 4 7 i. 4 - O 0 0 U 0 O 0 ?.4.2' 25 30 21.3 0800 52 U 0 12 9 16 3 0 0 0 0 23.8 24 32 15.2 0400 36 0 0 F 12 0 U 0 0 0 0 23.9 26 30 23.3 1000 30 0 1 a t2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.5 26 29 23.9 1100 27 0 G 2 10 5 U 0 0 0 0 D ?.4.5 26 30 21.7 1200 it 0 0 fi 6 1) 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 24.0 2li 29 .• 1300 2a: U U 4 3 13 :7 0 0 0 CI U 0 0 24.0 26 30 17.7 1400 36 U q 10 5 t7 4 CI 0 0 0 0 0 24.3 24 30 19.51 1500 34 0 0 i,. 13 5 o 0 0 0 0 n D 23.9 20 30 7.1.3 1500 ,.1 n 0 r, 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 U U 0 25.n 26 32 23.7 1701) 31 U 0 1 31 a U 0 0 0 0 o O 26.7 27 32 72.4 1Ono <6 G 0 ! 7 71 12 0 0 0 0 U 0 24.8 26 30 20.6 1900 =0 0 n 1 4 4 7 , 1 U n 0 0 0 0 7.4.2 26 28 19.7 ? ono 16 C 0 1 _ 4 9 0 , p i O 0 0 0 0 26.4 - - 35.9 2100 ° U fi it 2 1 0 1 0 U 0 0 U 0 0 25.6 - 22.4 2200 1 U u 1 C. 0 D 0 n •D 0 0 0 12.2 - - 2.2 2300 1 t 11 1 0 0 0 n 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 24.2 26 31 _ 241fr 493 1 46 88 Be 162 77 From: Fehr & Peers 408278 1717 12/15/2004 09 :11 4066 P.003/011 FROM : Traffic Data Servie PHONE NO.,: 4083772998 Nov. 02 2004 01:16PM P3 custornList -5131 Page 2 *Thu 21 Oct 200 1CSCA VS V85 vpp C Yymc Total nV00D -WOOS nV010 UV015 nV020 =V050 nV*b5 nV060 nV065 nV000 50 �� '0 6,(5 V a10 yogi nV000 nV005 nV010 nvo15 nv020 avo25 nvo30 nV03b nV040 5 10 15 _ 25 T1IDe 35 5 10 15 20 25 . 30 95 40 45 - 17 2 0000 4 0 0 0 0 2 U 0600 0 U 0 0 0 0 - 0 Q 0 0. 0 0 0 U 0 0 f)tu tt 0 0 0 0 U f) 0 U (I p U h 0 0 0 0 U .20 x1 U f, fl I} l: (1 (,) Ll �1 U 7 p U p t• - ] 0 � 0 0300 Cl t, f) O U o D it u n U O U 0 CI C. f. .b t 1 n 0400 3. U ;• .1 - U 0 0 0 r -I 0 0 0600 13 0 22.0 24 7.7 11.4 1.7 ;)500 0 U q :, n ; 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 it 0 it (' 25.5 28 30 21.0 01600 14 47 IJ f7 ) li 4 �1 7 23.6 25 0 19 -y 0 0 0 23.4 24 30 23 070U OBUO 50 1 0 c to a ;c_ 5 1 0 0 p 0 p 0 0 i, 24.3 ?.5 32 -S ?3 -S 0900 37 C 0 4 7 '1 10 7 24.0 p 0 0 0 0 0 u 22.3 21 26 li_2. 1000 23 U Cl s 7 3 7 3 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 24.0 25 31 21 -9 11.00 22 U 0 6 C) 4 6 6 Z 26 0 n p 0 0 26.9 27 31 22.4 1200 24 C) 1 0 O 2 ?O 5 1 U 0 0 1 D U 0 U 25.3 25 30 20.6 130D 17 0 U 2 .1 4 7 2 23.7 U 0 0 0 34 0 0 4 e 7 _......... ._. 1400.. _ 41......._..S> .__9. < 11 ..�....- 7 ._...7 ... 15 _..17 ......._ i 1 _.._5_._. .p..........p. 31 p .__n_. 2......... ..0 _.P.6 3._..28._...39 o '1.3 _. __. 1500 47 0 t L._. 0 0 0 6. 25.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.7 26 j2 16.6 1000 12 C' U I 4 g 12 6 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 O 25.2 Z6 '30 22.0 1700 23 O U 4 1 i'. 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.0 26 31 22.6 1600 43 0 t U a 0 17 9 22.2 0 29 0 0 U 0 24.'1 23 31 19.9 1900 20 Cl o 1 a 0 6 3 1 0 0 U 0 U 0 24.7 26 29 '13.0 2000 15 U U 1 3 t 7 2 u 0 U 0 0 0' 0 23.6 _ - 14.3 2100 a u 0 1 2 7. <' 2. U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.2 _ _ 2.2.4 2200 6 U 0 1 0 t 1 3 0 0 0 D 0 U 0 27.7 _ 3. 1 2300 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 24.3 0 � 1 0 0 0 0 24.6 2S 31 22.8 4241%r - 491 0 2 49 52 78 18.2 so 17 -Fri 22 Oct 2004 nVO30 nV03S UVID40 nV045 DVO50 nV055 nV06D nV06b 1CSCA VS V85 vpp C Yymc Total nV00D -WOOS nV010 UV015 nV020 nV025 45 50 5U 6o 6,(5 1000, 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 22.6 � - 17 2 0000 4 0 0 0 0 2 U 1 U 1 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 - _ _ 0100 0 0. 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0200 0300 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 U 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 16.4 _ 1.6 0400 <) C ] 0 � 0 1 U o U 0 0 o O U o D o 0 16.6 _ _ 7.0 t 1 n t 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.7 23 7.7 .19.7 0600 13 0 0 1 .5 5 0 0 0 0 D U 0 U 24.2 20 30 19.1 0700 A7 0 t ^ 9 e 20 5 2 0 0 D U 0 0 23.6 25 30 19 -y 0000 49 0 0 2 15 $1 19 4 1 0 0 u 0 0 0 23.6 25 31 'l.1.4 0900 26 0 U , 7 q 7 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.0 26 30 ZSA 1000 25 0 1 2 a a 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.7 20 30 10.7 1100 224 0 U 4 C. A A 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 n 0 26.'1 26 33 23.0 1200 32 U 0 4 5 4 5 12 C) 1 0 0 0 0 0 22.1 23 30 16.1 1:100 20 U 1 !1 2 2 7 2 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.7 23 31 13.2 1400 34 0 0 4 e 7 r 0 0 U 0 U 0 74.0 25 31 14.5 1500 30 0 c o s (3 r 1 1 1 U 0 0 0 U 25.5 21 32 23.0 t�On 33 U G 1 e 5 15 G 7 0 U 0 0 0 0 24.7 2: 80 21•V 1700 50 0 t1 11 t7 1() 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 254 2U 31 22.6 1600 50 0 U d b 19 13 2 0 U 0 0 0 0 22.2 21 29 13.4 1900 23 0' 0 4 6 4 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U 25.6 27 30 71.n 20UU 12 n 0 0 2 s 6 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 27.3 2Et 32 24.6 x100 14 0 U 1 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.3 - 12.1 2200 5 0 U 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 U U 0 0 21.6 - - 11.9 2300 7 0 0 2 3. 1 2 1 1 ib 2 O O 0 0 O 24.3 263% 23.D 2 4h 807 0 3 49 104 60 167 87 From:Fehr' & Peers 408 278 1717 12/15/2004 09:11 #066 P.0041011 FROM : Traffic Data Servie PHONE NO. 4083772998 Nov. 02 2004 01:17PM P4 CUSWmLrst -5131 Page 3 -Set 23 Oct 200 nP055 DV06 n V06 nv3. D nV0 6PD V50 VB6 VPa1 Total nV000 nV005 nV01 nV00 nV020 DV035 nV9 5 2 5 033 VV045 O 00 65 10 Tivac 3 10 0 0 A U n p'1..} 0000 4 h .: 2 a 2 1 U n 0 0 0 0 _U 0 0 u - 0 1UG -7 (• ''t 1 f; 0 it O- G it - 0200 0 0 nano 1 > 0 u 0 n 0 0 D 0 0 U 20... - - 1..7 (' U U 0 0 0 0 8 7 6 0500 2 0 (? l U 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 28.5 _ _ 26.2 0600 t1 0 0 0 0 0 U 23.1 24 30 20 -°, 0800 16 A 9 7 9 14 6 1 0 0 0 A U 0 u 24.2 23 31 21.t1 0900 3A' U 0 = 1� 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 23.4 24 29 i:3 -`, 1000 37 ) 1 1 F) 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 ) 22.3 22 30 11 -E. 1100 41 0 U r 11 5 13 5 0 0 p U 0 D o 24.2 24 31 21 •G 7$OU 37 C, 0 9 5 10 7 1 0 0 0 0 u U 24.1 24 31 23-9 1300 33 rt u 4 9 y 6 7 6 2 0 0 0 0 U U 0 0 21.7 21 30 11.4 1400 _._34_.......0...... n T 7..._.._�. 5 9 _._`. 7._.._ 0._.._....n .. i.. _. 0 ... .... . 0. .......... _ 0 ._........_0 ...23. -i -- 22__32. 23.7 ... 1500 31 fJ 1.__... 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 23.5 25 28 18.7 1600 47 U 0 C' 7 ' 1z 2 19 1 U 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 21 30 22 -3 1700 32 Ct 0 3 ` -• 19 5 2 2 0 U 0 U 0 0 24.6 26 30 19,7 1800 .29 0 U 2 6 4 17. 1 0 0 0 U U 26.3 26 30 . 19.7 1900 11 0 0 1 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 U U 0 27.2 26 32 23.9 2000 12 0 U 0 1 2 6 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 '22.4 24 27 16.8 2100 14 0 0 2 3 4 4 U 0 0 D 1 0 A J 25.7 18.3 2200 10 0 0 3 0 3 4 0 0 Q 0 0 o 0 27.1 T - 23.0 2300 7 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 69 10 1 1 3 O 0 0 23.8 25 30 21.5 2dLr 976 0 2 56 99 a7 146 -Sun 24 Oct 200' nv036 nv040 nv043 nv050 nV055 nV060 DV065 HEM V5 0 V85 v17s60 TLve%Total nV000 WOOS nv010 nVOIZ nV020 nV025 aV030 50 55 60 65 100 10 8 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 48 0 0 0 0 22.8 - OOOU 4 0 0 0 2 U 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0100 0 0 0 o n 0 0 0 0 0 - 9.8 0z00 1 U 0 U 1 0 1 1 0 u U 0 0 0 0 29.7 - - 23.9 03Q0 2 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ct 0 0 iS.6 - - 5.6 0400 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.1 - - 4.5 0900 1 0 U 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.$ - 0600 1 0 C I 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.4 - - 6.9 ' 0700 6 0 0 2 1 U 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 -23.5 24 26 22.8 0800 15 0 U C. -2 5 1 0 Q 0 1 A 0 U 0 26.2 27 30 23.0 0900 22 U 0 3 3 9, ° U 0 0 U 0 23.0. 26 30 21.9 100D 19 0 0 5 2 2 r 3 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 20.2 P. 21 g.7 1100 23 0 1 6 i 4 9 0 2 0 0 0 D 0 0 211.8 25 29 20.6 1700 33 0 0 6 3 6 '1 13 5 0 0 0 U 3300 41 U 1 11 31. 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 22:1 20 28. 10.7 1400 25 0 0 4 9 2 9 2 1. 0 U 0 C3 0 24.1 26 30 22.1 1ycln 40 ? 9 4 Iv s 0 0 0 U G U 0 24.9 2a 31 16.6 1600 26 G U 1 4 7 9 ? 1 2 1 0 0 0 U 0 25.6 26 31 22.4 1700 36 0 0 1 7 8 12 0 o U 0 0 U. 24.9 27 30 21.5 IHUu 20 u U 4 1 U 13 11 4 3 () 0 0 0 0 0 U U 0 24.E 27 32 ?.3.0 1900 13 0 0 3 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.3 24 30 23.3 2000 15 0 0 A 5 1 3 2 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.9 - - 20.6 21U0 1 0 0 U l 2 0 2200 3 U 0 0 i 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.8 49 74 62 124 47 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 2313 go 90 2 4h 557 0 4 From:Fehr & Peers 408 278 1717 12/15/2004 09 :11 #066 P- 005 /011 FROM Trafrj c Data Servie PHONE N0. 4063772996 Nov. 02 2004 01:17PM P5 customl ist -5131 Page 4 -Mon 25 Oct 200 WOO nVU45 Pv050 "V55 nV060 nv065 14sPD V50 v Tines Sota1 nv000 nV005 nVo10 nv015 nvO20 uVO25 nv030 nVO35 45 30 55 6u 65 300 10 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 - - - 4 U O 17.9 010t) 0 n �, 0 n ii U 0 U n 26.1 - 1.A.n U2u0 z G n 0 3 C U 0 n C. x3..0 :O.G - - 4.9 U300 1 1 ) p q 0 p U 0 p 0 t'. 20.2 - - - G.a 0000 2 3 u �, I 1 0 1 0 0 a 0 p r; 0 i; 21.8 23 26 16.h ri500 0 ti 1 4 4 0 U U 0 0- 0 0 t� 23.3 ^ <J 30 .10.b' OWo 17 G u 5 1.5 17. 15 F, 1 0 0 U U 0 r, 24.1 24 30 2119 0700 0600 !14 44 p ti d 1U 13 tt U 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.6 27 30 21.7 0900 30 o U 6 r, 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 21.0 20 28 15.4 )aU0 27 0 <' g t. 8 '.' 0 D 0 0 0 U 22.5 22 27 17.4 1100 27 0 0 2 F 70 1 0 0 0 0 U U 0 23.9 24 30 17.4 1260 36 0 U I 11 l 11 0 0 0 0 0 'L3.Z 25 iO 24.6 1.300 2� 5 1 0 0, 0 0 0 0 u 23.6 26 30 22.4 1400 �- 0 , 13 5 16 2_.. o. 0_. U 0 0 0 25.3 7.7 31 25.9 1900. 27. U �� 4 , ., 2 12 4 n 0 0 0. .._ u ..0 25.6..28 31 .24.8 .. _. .. 1600 37 0 0 3 ')' 4 13 8 0 0 0 U u 0 0 24.3 26 2,9 20.4 17 00 42 0 0 1 6 9 21 3 0 1 0 0 0 25.7 27 30 21.9 1800 41 � 4 3 4 2 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 26.5 26 32 21.7 '1900 23 0 4 b 6 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.5 23 26 14:3 2000 24 0 0 1 f 11 4 2 U 0 0 0 0 0 U 22.8 17.0 2100 6 0 0 +1 1 3 2 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.2 - - 23.3 " z�o2 1 U u U o 0 n 1 0 - - 13.2 2300 1 0 0 69 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.9 25 3O 2 4b 509 0 3 41 1 6 105 1707 , •Tue 20 Oct 2004 DVO35 nV040 nvo4a nV090 nVO55 nvo60 nVO65 MBFD V30 V95 vPA�o Times Total. nV000 nV006 aVola nVO15 nV920 W025 ZV080 50 35 60 65 100 5 }0 1S 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 0 0 0000 U 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0100 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 o U 0 0200 0 0 0 n 1 0 U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.9 - - 11.0 0300 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 U U 0 0 G 21.9 - - 8.3 0400 3 0 0 n 2 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 u 0 18.7 ,- - 610 0500 4 0 t n 1 1 J. 3 1 0 u 0 0 0 U 0 22.2 - _ 12.5 0600 10 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.3 24 30 22.4 0700 47 0 0 8 10 15 6 0 0 0 U 0 0 25.3 26 32 22.8 0000 57 0 n 11 a 9 19 15 1 U 0 0 0 0. 0 24.0 24 32 17.2 0900 38 0 1 8 9 11 7 n 0 0 n 0 0 0 23.2 24 28, 18.6 1000 25 0 U i 7 F 8 2 1 0 0 a u 0 0 24.3 26 31 21.7 1100 2C n 0 4 4 4 6 6 U 0 0 U 0 0 23.$ . 26 30 22.1 1200 36 n 1 0 4 14 5 1 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 7,.3.0 '25 30 20.1 1300 2B 0 0 4 4 5 11 3 1 0 U 0. U G 0 0 25.1 26 30 21 .0 1.400 33 0 n 2 5 A )0 a 1. 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.7 26 32 21.5 1500 15 U U 1 7 .7 � 10 9 0 0 0 u 0 U 0 24.0 21 32 22.6 1,600 32 0 0 3 2 a 11 12 9 6 1 1 0 +1 0 U 0 25.3 .26 30 20.8 1')00 39 p C' 1 ? 8 6 4 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.5 22.28 13.6 1800 Jd U 0 li 10 10 4 0 0 U Cl 0 U 0 24.2 26 29 20.8 1900 23 0 0 3 2 4 B. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.9 26 b2 :2.8 2000 33 0 U 4 5 5 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.6 26 27 22.4 2100 1.F o t+ I l 4 8 2 1 U U 0 0 U 0 0 27,7 22.6 2200 ft 0 0 0 0 U 0. 1 0 4 0 0 U 0 0 0 1) U 0 _ = 2300 0 0' 0 46 100 91 164 99 7 1 0 0 a 0 0 24.9 26 31 22.8 24hr 517 0 3 From:Fehr & Peers 408 278 1717 12/15/2004 09:12 4066 P.006/011 FROM : Traffic Data Servie PHONE N0. : 4063772998 Nov. 02 2004 01:18PM P6 CustomLig -5131. P898 5 -Wed 27 Oct 200 !lgPG V50 V85. v'Faee . Tj= Tvtma nV000 rvoD5 nVOlv0 aV015 nV020 nV045 nV050 nV03�J aVD60 nVO65 50 MSPG VSO V6 v ZGtal t1V000 nvoob nvolo nV015 nV020 nV02b nY030 aV035 aVOlO 45 SO 55 60 65 100 20 25 30 10 Tl>� 45 0 10 18 20 25 30 35 40 0000 . U U 0 0 16 tt - 0 i6 ) uuOU 7 l :: 1 ii U T U U 0 0 0 0 0. u 0 o 36.3 - _ 28•a OlUp 1 Ct u o i ti t) 0 q U u 0 0 1' u 0 0200 0 0 0 h _ 2D.2 - - - _ 14.1 0200 U o u u U 0 ,9 24.- _ 0 li.? Otnn 1 0 0 t. 1 1 0 1 0300 2 u U u t 0 ii ) C - 0 n 0 0 0 0 t 0 0 0400 1. 0 ;! 2 t 0 7. 0 1 0 0 0 0 U 0 23.5 24 28 19.2 0500 6 n 0 0 i 3 6 0 0 0 t) 7 U 0 C 23.8 25 '30 3 22.6 0600 12 U 1 0 7 9 11 7 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 28 30 21.7 0*/oo 41 46 0 0 2 11 6 18 9 0 0 0 57 0 0 o 7 24.3 25 31 21.3. 0800 47 0 1) i. 11 7 13 5 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.5 21 28 14.3 0900 30 0 0 4 0 7 8 2 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,a.5 24 30 22.1 1000 1100 76 U 0 0 0 0 23.3 74 28 0 0 0 0 U U '24:6 25 32 25.1 1200 35 0 1 1 0 4 17 9 U 0 0 35 0 0 0 22.4 23 29 12.5, 1300 26 0 U 3 8 0 24.9 2d 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y3 -9 25 29 19.7 1400 32 <) 0 1 3 5 14 2 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 24.7 26 30 31 -9 1500 4F 0 C 0 6 a 21 6 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.5 27 ]; 23.3 1600 37 0 U 3 1 6 11 13 1 23.3 t 6A0 0 0' U 0 23.8 29 iF 24.7 1800 41 0 U 7 5 7 16 F' 0 0 1 0 0 0 U u 0 24.6 26 33 33 24.4 1800 51 U .1 4 6 2 10 8 0 19.9 0 0 U 0 0 22.4 24. 28 222.4 1900 0 0 ) 5 4 � 10 3 0 0 0 C. U () 0 n 26.4 2't 31. 21.9 7,.000 16 16 G U 1 1 1 5 5 1 7 17.0 2000 23, 0 0 6 7 2100 7 n 0 0 U 3 3 0 U 10.5 2100 11 n u 1 .i 2 A 1 2200 9 0 u Cl is U 1 0 U 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0. n 0 Z4 26 31 2 2500 2 4h 519 0 4 55 109 B3 178 of 12 3 0 0 0 0 U -1' 2 2 U -Thu 26 Oct 2004 pV040 nV049 uVOSO nV035 aV060 aVe65 !lgPG V50 V85. v'Faee . Tj= Tvtma nV000 rvoD5 nVOlv0 aV015 nV020 nV025 nV030 aV095 50 55 6o 65 100, 10 b l0 13 20 25 30 38 40 45 0 0 0 0000 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U u 0 0 D 0 A o _ _ _ _ 0100 u U 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 18.4 - - 0•� 0200 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 U 0 ,9 24.- _ - li.? Otnn 1 0 U 0 1 1 0 1 0 U 0 �� - 04UU 1 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 n U 0 0 .0 0 ') 1 10.5 - -" 11.9 0500 5 0 n 2 2 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 n 0 23.1 - - 10.3 0600 7 0 0 1 0 3 3 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.1 26 30 21.9 0700 43 (. 1 5 i 1 5 17 6 0 U U 0 . 0 0 24.2 31 UBUU 57 ( 1 1 7 tU 6 20 10 3 0 U 0 U 0 24.3 23 23 32 24.11 24 0900 35 0 U 4 9 4 7 11 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 22.4 23 30 21.5 00 4 o > 6 3 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 23.3 74 28 19.2 1100 21 0 n 5 3 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 o 22.5 22- 30 12.5 1200 35 0 0 4 12 5 9 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 2d '33 23.5 . 1�On 2 6 3 2 9. 0 U U U 0 0 22.9 25 30 ZZ -O 1400 41 0 2 y ? 4 15 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.7 28 29 14.9 1500 3s n U 0 9 ? 20 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2. °O, -5 27 31 23.3 t 6A0 39 0 0 : 5 4 iF 4 U 0 U 0 is u U 24.2 26 '30 21.3 1700 38 0 7 7 5 16 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '23.9 26 29 19.9 18on 45 n U r 12 6 22 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.6 19, 33 9.6 190C ld 0 0 ? 6 0 2 .4 0 0 U 0 23.3 22 28 17.0 2000 23, 0 0 6 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.3 21 29 10.5 2100 11 n u 1 .i 2 A 1 0 A 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 29.2 - 21.9 2?no 4 0 0 U 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 2:4.0 = 18.1 2306 5 0 0 U 1 2 2 U 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 23.8. 26 31 21.7 2[i.z 510 0 6 47 115 72 180 83 From:Fehr & Peers 408 278 1717 12/15/2004 09:12 #066 P.007 /011 FROM : Traffic Data Servie PHONE No. : 4883772998 Nov. 02 2004 01:i8PM P7 CustomList -5132 Page 1 Traffic Data Service Speed Re Port Custo rugs -$132 DATASE S: Site: [p01S] SB TITUS AVE: Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, r., 8, 9, 10, Speed range: 1 - 100 mph. Direction: South (bound) Headway; All Scheme ....... _.._ -. Scheme F _. Name: Factory dethult profile Method: Vehicle classification Units: Non -Metric (ft, mi, f /s, mph, lb, ton) NORTH OF NORTHAMPTON DRIVE 11, 12, 13 -Tue 19 Oct 20D2 nVO4S nV050 nV'O55 aYD60 nV065 DL4PD V50 V88 vPa10 Time Total nV000 mvoo5 nvolo nv015 nV020 nV025 av090 nv095 nV040 55 60 65 100 5 10 78 20 25 SO 3b 40 45 50 10.3 U 0 0 1 0 1 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 0000 2 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 _ _ 0100 0200 0 0 ^ n U U 0 C. 0 0 . 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 21.6 _ 12.6 0300 2 U r, n v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 2712 - 17,7 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 0500 1 0 0 1 0 U 0 0 0 U 0 2x3.1 - - 20.4 OG00 4 0 o n U 1 2 1 5 2 0 0 U 0 0 0 "1.6.2 2e . 31 23.9 0700 2E 1) 0 _ ; 2 12 ?. 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.5 25 29 21.5. .0800 35 U o 2 10 15 1 3 0 0 0 0 U 0 223.6 26 30 21.7, 0900 20 0 1 s 1 4 9 5 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 26.2 ;7 90 20.1 1000 23 2 c 0 n 0 0 0 0 23.1 32 7.6 1100 24 v 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.6 `7 4 29 20.8 1200 35 0 ii 4 9 i4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.0 2B 33 25.5 1300 34 0 0 7 2 1 17 9 .1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.9 25 32 '23.0 1400 29 0 U 4 6 5 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 U 23.6' 23 32 22.6 1500 31 0 U a 11 2 B S 2 2 1 0 0 U U 0 24.7 25 S1 14.5 1600 41 0 0 1 14 5 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.4 26 51 21.7 1700 47. n u 5 5 E 15 71 1 0 0 n U 0 23.7 26 30 23.3 1900 47 U 0 5 11 2 l5 0 1 6 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 23 3S 14.11 1.900 33 U C 2 7 11 3 ; 5 0 0 U U 0 U 0 22.3 73 31 14.8 2000 26 ,) ti 5 6 6 4 0 U u U U 0 27,4 26 3 i6.4 '11 no 17 U 0 C, A 0 0 3 2 U U U 0 0 0 0 2:x.6 22.1 2200 6 0 6 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 35.8' w - 25.9 2300 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 O O 0 0 24.7 26 32 22.6 ..hr 489 0 2 a4 97 74 1S3 07 25 Z. 20 Oct 2004 nV030 nV096 pV040 nvo4a nvoso nvoaa nv060 nV065 MS PD Y50.V8D vBa.10 Time Total nV000'nvoo5 nv010 rwoi5 nv020 nV025 45 50 35 60 65 100 S 10 15 20 2E 30 38 40 0 0 0 0 0 17.9 11.9 0000 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 _ 0100 0 0 (t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.4 25.5 0303 1 0 0 ti 0 0 0 U 0 1 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 18.5 _ 8.5 04 00 1 0 o U 1 0 0 1 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 31.5 - - 24.2 . 0500 Z U U 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 U 0 30.6 _ _ 23.0 0f00 6 0 0 n 0 G 3 2 7. U 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.8 26 29 21.9 0700 n 0 0 ? 4 ).0 2 U 0 0 0 o 25.3 25 32 21.9 0000 31 0 0 3 4 9 7 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.9" 22 al 14.6 0900 19 �, 0 2 4 5 4 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 27.2 27 33 19.72 1000 29 0 11 0 2 10 10 4 2 0 U 0 0 0 0 i• °,.0 27 29 21.7 1100 21 0 1) 3 1 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 n 0 23.3 25 30 20.3 1200 31 n n e 5 5 10 4 1 0 0 U (> 0 0' 23.6 25 29 '2-0 1300 2E 0 0 i 6 4 1Z 3, 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.6 23 28 '21.5 14p0 an U 1 ;, 11 y 14 4 3 U 2 0 0 0 0 0 t3 0 22.5 24 28 17,7 7. °4Cr 5q C; a 16 N 1R n 0 0 0 0 0 0 za.9 24 3i 20.6 1600 ?5 0 c 0 10 30 7 1 0 0 n 0 U 0 24.5 26 ,11 73.3. 1700 53 n 6 6 E' 1v l:i 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.0 2') 31 21.3 1800. 47. 0 u 4 c N 16 7 0 C, 0 0 0 ;A.j 26 30 21.5 1500 27 0 0 4 la 5 5 1 0 0 0 U 0 U 23.0 23 30 13.4 2000 23 0 r. s 6 4 y t3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72.4 1.9 ;:8 18.1 2100 1:1 0 u 3 3 1 1 0 U 0 0 0 0 u 21.7 14.9 7200 '1 0 G 1 2 3 1 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 24.5 - - 17.9 2300 3 0' 0 n 1 0 2 0 U 2 0 0 0 0 0 24.2 26 31 21.9 24hr 505 0 4 47 96 89 182 72 13 From:Fehr & Peers FROM : Traffic Data Servie 408 278 1717 12/15/2004 09:12 #066 P.008/011 PHONE NO. : 4083772998 Nov. 02 2004 01:19PM P8 customtist -5132 Page 2 .Thu 21 Oct 2001 uV015 nV020 nV02D nVD30,nPOSS nVOdO nv045 aVD55 nV060 nV060 RV060 DL4PD V50 V85 WAr+1D Tim9 Tat_, nV000 nV005 10 nvOt0 20 25 30 S5 40 45 SO 55 60 .65 100 0 5 10 19 20 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 1714 - - i6x/ 0000 3 i, 0 ] C 0 U U U u O U 0 0 0 U U 0 29.5 - - 6• y o1ntt U 0 n U 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 t t. - - 020( 0O 0 n U n 0 t U A n n 0 t) 0 0 0 0 0 22.4 _ 17.1 0400 3 0 n 0 ) 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 20.5 - - - 0400 0500 1 0 0 0 o 0 U 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 2.0.1 - - 22.6 OGOO 0 0 ' 0 2 1 ) 0 U 0 0 0 U 0 U 0 2.4.1 26 29 1.9.9 0700 34 U 2 1 2 8 14 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 C Zd.9 25 34 23.9 3800 38 U 0 s 3 5 11 1G 2 1 0 0 0 U U 2B_8 28 34 24.4 0900 Z.) 0 0 1 2 ! 12 6 7 2 0 n O U U 0 25.1 25 33 24.0 1000 24 0 0 1 6 3 •i 5 3 2 0 n 0 0 0 O 24.2 25 32 24 • t} 1100 31 0 U 3 6 4 6 0 0 n 0 0 O 0 23.5 26 30 22.6 1200 27 0 i 4 � 3 U )U i 1 0 0 0 0 U 0 24.3- 26 30 21.0 1300 32 0 n 7 5 14 71 1 10 0 0 U 0 n 26.7 2H 31 22.1' 1400 30 C) ). 1 6 2 ' 4 a 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 u 26.6 2S 34 25.7 1500 46 U n :? �. G .14 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.4 26. 32 22.4 1600 52" 0' n 6 9 1.0 13 12 2 0 U 0 _0 _. A . 0 0 24.0 25 _ 29 19.2 1700 40 U n _ e 6 Si 3 1 0 0 0 C 0 U 24.6 27 30 27.6 1600 60 U 1 9 25 6 ") 1 1 1 0 0 U U U 25.9 26 32 21.5 1900 29 0 1) 3' 4 6 0 O 1 0 O O O 0 0 A 20.1 26 - A- 2000 ] 0 :) U 0 7 U .1 2 2 0 0 U U 0 U 24.3 25 31 23.0 23.00 22 C, 0 4 5 2 4 5 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 26.1 78 33 22.8 2200 11 0 U 0 2 3 2 0 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.0 - - 8.5 2300 6 U 0 2 34 202 73 179 98 22 6 0 0 0 0 o 25.2 27 32 29.3 2ar h 524 0 8 -Fri 22 Oct 200a WOOS nVOlO aV015 nVO20 aVO25 aV090 nV035 nVO40 t1V045 aVOSO nV055 nV060 RV 065 234Pb 750 V66 � Tim* Total nV'000 5 10 15 20 25 30 95 40 45 s0 55 60 t+S 100 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 20.2 i6x/ 0000 3 0 t o 0 1 0 1 0 0 U U 0 29.5 - 6• y 0100 3 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 ?A0 0300 0O 0 n U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.4 _ 17.1 0400 3 0 n 0 ) 1 1 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 20.5 - - 22.6 0500 3 n o 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 .0 0 U 0 0 29.0 - - 22.6 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 27 30 19.9 0700 30 0 0 2 2 6 19 1 1 0 0 U 0 0 0 26.4 28 33 24.8- 0800 38 U 0 3 5 1 tm t0 2 0 0 0 U 0 0. 27.3 27 33 23.7 0900 14 0 0 0 2 4 2 4 4 0 Q 0 0 0 0 25.0 25 34 '30.3 1000 25 0 n E 1 5 7 5 3 2 0 0 0 U 0 0 23.6 25 31 22.4 1100 22 0 0 3 2 7 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.9 24 31 23.3 1200 .29 0 0 4 5 5 b 0 3 24.6 23 32 22.6 ssn0 9 6 0 10 0 0 0 0 24.0 23 30 15.9 37 U 2 0 a 0 11 2 16 17 b 0 0 0 n 0 0 27.7 29 33 24.f• 1500 50 0 n i 5 6 12 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.7 26 33 22•n 1600 40 n t! 0 t7 11 r, 21 6 2 0 U U 0 U 0 23.1 24 30 22.4 1,700 61 U n 5 16 10 19 9 1 u 0 U U 0 0' 22.9 25 30 21.3 1000 60 n 1n to I 4 3 0 0 [t 0 0 0 23.4 25 28 7.0.1 1900 46 0 0 r 0 9 4 (t U 0 0 0 0 0 23.9 26 30 23.5 2000 21 0 1 7 .1 2 0 0 0 0 U U 1 U 21.5 21 27 15.7 2100 29' 0 U 4 5 3 0 1 0 0 U U U 0 0 19.6 - - 11..3 �2A0 6 0 0 7 7 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 22.5 .- - 15.0 2SDO 7 0 1 0 0 7 Sa 118 82 178 102 23 2 0' 0 0 0 0 2a.5. 26 32' 23.5 24Rr 560 - From.Fehr & Peers 12/16/2004 09:13 #066 P.009/011 FROM : Traffic Data Servie PHONE NO. 4083772998 Nov. 02 2004 01:19PM P9 CustomUst -5132 Page 3 -sat 23 Oct 2004 nVO25 nVo3o nVO35 nV040 aV045 MV050 aVO55 aVO60 nV065 MSPD V50 V95 vFa O Tjv,o Total bv000 nV005 nVU10 nV015 nVO2D 45 50 55 60 65 100 b 10 1.5 20 25 30 38 40 U 0 U 1• 23.7 f. 1 ;1 OW) [I 0 0 C' 1 1 U fi - .• n u 0 U 0 0 4_ 0 u 0 u 0200 U 0 u 1 U U 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 - - 0300 2 Q n ) o U 2 U 0 U 0400 2 ) ) i1 1 D 0 t 0. U 0 U 0 U 29.0 1y•b 0500 2 0 it V '- 1 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 G 27.1 _ _ 21.9 0600 3 0 0 0 U 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.4 - - 18.6 0700. 0 C 0 1 0 1 7 0 1 2 0, 0 U 0 0 0 '23.5 25 29 17.7 0800 20 0 is ). C 1 0 U 0 0 0 %4.9 26 30 23.5 0900 29 0 0 2 3 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 C, 22.2 22 28 18.1 1()UO 37 () 1 it 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.0 26 29 20.1 1100 25 Cl 0 2 r, 3 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.7 23 29 19.7 1200 38 0 4 [! 6 IS 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 D 24.1 26 30 19.7. 1300 36 0 u 4 5 8 1.3 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 D 24.9 :7 32 23.5 1400 43 0 2 L 8 4 7 11 12 2 0 D' 0 0 G 0 0 21 Ai 23 27 17.4 1500 30 0 1 Q 6 6 7 i2 ^.. 15 6 14 6 o 0 0 U 0. 0 0 22.8 23 30 '19.9 1606 53 n U 0 6 3 4 14 4 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 23.7 25 30 21.7 1'IUo 31 U 0 5 3 16 ? 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 25.2 27 30 23.7 1800 26 0 0 0 0 3 5 1 2 0 U o 0 0 U 25.1 24 29 10.0 1900 16 0 0 3 .5 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 C 23.1 23 29 20.4 000 18 0 2 1 5 .1 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.6 22 25 17.4 2100 11 0 0 2 1 2 3 0 0 U 0 0 0 20.8 1'1 29 7.9 2200 14 1 1 2 3 4 2 0 5 1 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.3 20 29 19.7 2300 24 hr 11 4151 0 1 0 6 b3 87 86 161 50 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 28.5 25 30 21.9 -Sun 24 Oct 200A -Sims Total WDOO nV006 nva10 nVOi5 aV020 nVO25 nV030 nV035 dVO40 nV045 DVD50 aV055 nVO60 nV066 USED V50 V0.9 VPAM 5 10 Is 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 100 10 0000 6 0 0 1 1 1. 1 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 21.3• - -, 15.4 0100 u 0 0 U u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 - - - - 0200 1 0 U O n o 1 0 U 0 0 0 U. 0 o 29.6 - - 19.7 0300 1 U 0 C) i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 18.3 - - 8.5 0400 1 0 n U 0 0 0 0 1 U 0 0 0 ti 0 35.5' - - 25.5. Da00 0 0 0 0 0 U U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - 0600 2 0 0 0 U n 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 28.6' - - 21.3 0700 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 D () 0 0 0 0 28.2 - - 18.6 0800 11 0 0 Q 2 S 3 1 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 23.8 23 26 16.3. 0900 15 0 0 0 3 5 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 23 30 20.4 .1 ODD 24 0 ) 1' 4 5 9 3 1 G (1 0 U 0 0 24.0 26 30 20.1 1100 24 0 2 3 10 5 a 1 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.9.1 19 25 13.0 1200 32 0 0 6 3 4 16 2 1 0 U U 0 0 0 23.7 27 29 20.1 1300 32 0 1 1 9 H R 4 1 0 0 0 0 ol 0 22.6' 23 29 14.1 1400 31 o o 2 11 7 1 U 0 n 0 0 0 24.7 26 32 :44•i 1500 tit v 1 1 13 0 5 3 0 0, 0 0 0 U 0 21.4 19 28 14.:i 1600 34 0 1 1 5 0 14 9 2 0 0 0 0 U 0 26.3 29 33 24.4 1,100 33 0 n 2 8 R .1 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 24.2, 23 31 21.7 1800 32 0 U 5 R 6 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 U 24.6 24 31 17.4 1900 16 0 1 '1 3 1 4 5 1 0 0 0 0 U 0 25.1. 27 32 21.9 9.000 9 U 0 2 . 1 2 1 0 0 0 .0 U 0 0 20.4 - - 11.0 2100 12 0 0 2 4 2 4 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ?.0.7 18 27. 13.0 2200 9 0 U 0 2 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 2d.9 - - 20.6 2300 .1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.7 - - 5.6 24hr 398 0 7 32 84 sa 1a6 55 9 1 0 0 0 1 0 23.6 24 31 U.1 From:Fehr & Peers FROM : Traffic Data Servie 408 278 1717 12/15/2004 09:13 #066 P.010 /011 PHONE NO. : 4083772998 Nov. 02 2004 01:20PM P10 CustornUst -5132 Page 4 .Mon 25 Oct 2001 nV045 nv080 nV055 aV060 aV065 1QSPD VSD �'� �a Time Tot.Al aV000 WOOS r"Vo10 W015 nVO20 nvo ?b nv090 nV039 i7V040 50 55 60 65 100 0 5 10 18 20 25 90 35 4o 45 n 0 (' 17.3 - 0000 (r '.� t) i) 0 0 0 n 0 U 0 0 0 U 0 C. 20.8 - _ 1F.1 3.4 9i00 2 ('. U li 1 7 0 U 0 C - 32DO 0 U 0 it • n 0 0 '0 0 o u 33.9 23n9 i1 0 0 0 n 0 n U 0400 0 c U G 0 n 0 0 U 0 -0 0 U 0 0$00 0500 0 n u n 1 } i 2 2 0 0 n 0 a 76.4 27 30 22.4 0700 34 0 1 t 6 1y 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 26.0 27 30 20.8 0800 38 0 u y a 17 5 2 0 n G 0 0 21.3 79 28 13.4 0900 25 0 n 4 p 4 7 2 0 0 0 n O G U 0 24.2 26 29 27. -1 1000 22 0 0 :r 4 1 1t 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 G 21.9 21 29 19.0 1100 25 1 1 d 4 3 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 r,, . 2.3.0 • 24. 28 70.6 1200 41 U n 3 6 13 14 3 0 1300 2 6 0 2 1 7 5 4 1 1 0 0 n 0 24.4 25 31 15.7 1400 38 U 0 = 10 t; 1.1 6 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 24.9 24 33 17.7 1500 43 U 0 2 12 8 10 10 1 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 22.8 23 30 13.2 1600 46... 0 0. 6 ._ 14'. 9 12 ._10 .._ 2 .__0 0 0 0 ...0_._ 0 29:.1.......26 31 22.d 1700 54 0 0 3 it 9 17 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 223.7 25 30 21.3 !Roo 62 0 3 0 15 15 20 9 4 0 U 0 0 U U 0 25.5 26 30 22.4 1300 22 U 0 0, 4 3 11 0 0 U 0 0 n 23.2 22 29 1:, -4 2000 2u 0 0 1 10 4 it 3 0 0 0 0 u U 0 :> 21.1 19 27 14.5 7.100 19 0 0 4 6 4 3 2 0 1 n 0 0 0 U 28.6 17.9 2200 - 0 0 n u 2 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 U 0 23.9 _ _ 10.7 2300 3 0 U 6 0 38 1 121 1 101 180 06 9 .0 2 1 0 0 0 0 24.0 23 31 - 24h- 545 1 ►Tue 20 Oct 200 „V035 nV040 UV043 aV050 WOW aV060 aV065 MBPn V50 V6E aPaoe Time Totatl iV000 nv005 nVO10 15 nV'015 aVO20 20 25 nVO25 30 nV030 95 40 45 50, 59 60 65 100 10 0000 0 .5 U 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0100 o U 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0200 0 ti 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U 0 0300 1 0 n o u 0 0 0 0 0 0 () 0 0 0 U 22.2 - - 11.2 G400 1 0 0 0 n i D 0 0 1 n 0 0 '0 U 0 35.4 _ _ 25.5 05nn 1 0. 0. U n n 1 0 0 0 0 n 0 27.0 - - 21.7 0600 5 0 0 n 1 0 2 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 G 0 2226.6 27 30 21.0 0700 ;3 0 n 3 0 1 u 23 17 7 2 n U 0 0 0 0 25.5 2'1 32 24.8, neoo 41 0 0 3 4 2 7 6 6 n 0 0 0 0 0 U, 25.1 26 31 20.6 0900 26 o n f; y 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 26.8 29 33 24:6 1000 22 n 0 2 3 2 6 3 0 0 U U 0 0 0 23.5 25 30 24.4 1100 18 0 C, :t 5 6 1 6 10 7 1. U 0 0 0 0 0 25.7 7.6 32 2119 1200 34 0 0 4 10 4 6 0 it 0 0 0 0 0 23.3 25 .29 18.6 1300 38 0 () B 4 .14 9 11 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 25.4 28 34 26.6 1400 40 t1 o 13 3 10 3' 4 1 0 0 0 U 0 24.3 22 31 10.1 1500 37 0 U _r 1 10 G 1 7 2 0 0 U U 0 3 24.7 23 31 20.6 1600 33 0 0' 4 7 7 14 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.6 26 32 22.4 1700 45 U 0 3 9 S 16 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0' 24.3 26 30 20.1 1800 42 0 U 3 1 - a 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.1 25 32 24.6 1900 33 0 r 10 112 6 :4 U 0 0 0 n 0 0 22.0 21 27 15.2 22000 31 0 0 1 9 5 0 0 U C) t) U 11 25.5 28 33 21.0 2190 2n, 0 0 0 i 5 R 1 0 U 0 0 0 Cl 0 25.1 19.7 220n 9 U G 1 0 1 2 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 22.0 - - 16.6 2300 243- -0 514 n 0 n 1 42 109 76 164 101 19 2 0 0 0 D 0 24.8 26 32 - From:Fehr & Peers 408 278 1717 12/15/2004 09:13 #066 P.011 /011 FROM Traffic Data'Servie PHONE NO. : 4083772998 Nov. 02 2004 01:20PM P11 CustomList -5132 Page 5 -Wed 2T Oct 2004 edm V50 Ves Vpam Time TOtaa nV000 avoos nV010 nV015 nVo2o nV025 nV090 60 65 100 Ti=m 2ota1 nV000 nvoo5 nV010 nV015 nV020 nV025 nv090 #V036 nV040 aV045 nV050 nV055 nV060 I%V06S mp0 V50 V95 vpa*o 8 5 10 15 20 28 30 35 40 AS 30 55 60 65 100 8.3 10 0000 0 G .1 1, G 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 18.2 _ _ 0000 OlOU 0 0 (' U G 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 n 0 0 0 G - - 0200 0 ('! U t) r. 0 0 ri t) 0 A 0 G 0 0 o t> U 0 0 _ - - = 0300 0300 G U n a u 0 0 U U 0 Q. D G 0 0 C, 29.'7 .- - - ]9.7, 0400 1 i, 0 a c .� 0 0 0 7 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 24.1 _ - - 0500 0500 0 0 G 0 n 1 1 2 1 0 0 G 0 0 0 30 -t1 J 7].U, 21:7 0600 t} 0 4 C1 1 - 1'l 7 2 2 0' 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 28 30 21 -.'+ 0700 2b G 0 1 3 5 1,5 2 U 0 0 t) 0 0 27.9 7 „9 33 25.9 0000 28 0 1 1 1 3 10 10 3 0 0 0 G 0 U 29.6 27 31 21.9 0900 26 0 1 3 2 3 11 6 3 5 1 U 0 0 0 0 0 24.1 24 31 18.6 ].000 28 0 ) =' = ? 8 5 1, 1 0 0 0 0 0 25_.1 25 31 23.0 1100 27 0 u 4 4 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 A 0 U 24.5 23 32 24.4 1200 29 0 1 4 a 7 5 9 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.7 28 33 26.4. 1300 32 0 0 2 7 3 11 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.1 26 30 21.0 1400 35 0 0 4 4 5 14 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.9 27 33 23.9 1500 44 0 0 2 1 5 14 12 3 0 0 0 0 U 0 26.1 21 32 23.9 1600 50 U 0 3 6 6 20 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.0 27 30 A) .9 1700 92 0 3 4 7 1 23 8 0 1 0 0 ._ 0 0 _ U 23.7 23 32 23.9 - 1000 63 0 T 10 iF,, 10 i5 14 n 0 0 0 0 0 U 24.2 26 30 22. 8 790A 32 0 1 10 h 4 13 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 u 2:.1 20 11 10.9 2000 30 0 t> 6 9 3 5 4 2 0 n 0 0 p u 0 ,22.5 zz 2,) 14.3 2100 20 0 0 1 r 6 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.2 1 °.'/ 13.0 2200 5 G () 1 2 3 1 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.2 - Y 27.5 300 4 0 0 0 47 1 97 U 89 1 177 103 25 3 0 a 0 0 0 25.0 x7 s2 22.8 24hr 542 0 7 110 00 162 114 2s -Thu 28 Oct 200 aV098 nV040 aVO49i pVoso nVOSS AV060 =Von edm V50 Ves Vpam Time TOtaa nV000 avoos nV010 nV015 nVo2o nV025 nV090 60 65 100 10 8 10 i5 20 25 30 35 40 AS 50 58 8.3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 A 18.2 _ _ 0000 1 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 D100 0200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 t1 0 0 0 0 0 - 21.5 - - - - 0300 1 0 0 G 0 1 0 A 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 Cl U 0 0400 0 0 0 n U 0 U C, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 24.1 _ - 14.5 0500 0 0 G 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 C1 D 0 26.2 - - 7].U, Ofoo 7 t} U 0 2 1 - 1'l 7 2 0 0 U 0 0 o 27.9 20 31 22.6 0700 31 0 0 2 1 7 0 U 0 �; 0 0 26.1 26 33 25.1.' 0800 37 0 0 1 0 !i i2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 '25.5 28. 33 23.9 0900 26 n 1 s ? 4 4 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 27.3 29 31 71.9 2000 22 U 1 a 2 3 U 8 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.8 19 30 14.3 1100 24 0 0 3 a z 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.1 25 30 20.6 17.00 32 0 U 3 8 4 10 � 0 22.5. 24 30 20.8 . 3300 30 0 7 17 9 3 0 0 0 0 6 0 26.7 .9' 32 22.6 1400 42• U i, :" 4 d 0 U 0 0 A 0 24.7 26 32 23.7 1500 58 1 0 t 9 17 14 12 4 0 U 0 0 U 0 26.7 28 33 22_4 1600 46 0 0 ? 7 6 11 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 .24.4 26 30 21.7 1700 42 U 0 ': 5 G 20 5 1 i 0 0 0 n 0 0 22.8 2 2 JO 13.4 1800 53 o 0 T 10 7 14 8 g n 0 0 U 0 n. 23.7 25 30 15. 9 1900 34 0 0 3 10 5 8 2 0 0 0 0 u 24.8 .23 32 14.5 2.000 24 ti 0 1 6 2 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 22.0 .lU 28 12.5 2100 17 U r, 0 y 7 2 0 0 n U 0 0 0 0 27.2 1 °.'/ 2200 9 U 0 0 0 3 5 1 - 29 [70 1 f1 0 0 0 t) 0 0 24.9' 26 32 22.6 2 4h 739 1 3 3 43 110 00 162 114 2s Page 1. of 2 Kristin Bores Traffic Matrix #101 From: John Cherbone Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 10:11 AM To: Paul Miller Cc: Rishi Kumar; Kristin Borel; Rick Torres Subject: RE: Followup from May 31st Hi Paul and Rishi, I am still waiting for the report from our Traffic Engineer regarding the stop sign and speed limit. He is performing an analysis of the area: We will get a report back by the September Traffic Safety Meeting. The permanent speed sign, if approved by the Traffic Safety Commission, will need to get funded via the City Council as w&do not have funds budgeted for these improvements. If they approve the sign then it will need to go to City Council for approval. The truck limit sign, completion of the eradication of the second crosswalk, and the City limits sign at Miller will be implemented. The signs and other materials needed to complete these items are on order and as soon as they arrive we will complete them. My apologies for these issues taking so much time and we will do our best to complete them as soon as possible. Thanks for your continued patients. Sincerely, John From: Paul Miller [mailto:condoralpha @comcast.net] Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 3:16 PM To: John Cherbone Cc: Rishi Kumar Subject: Re: Followup from May 31st Hi John, I'm wondering what is happening with the "Cox - DeHavilland" traffic safety improvement effort. It looks like they eradicated most of the mid -block yellow cross -walk and repainted the STOP on the pavement on Miller and DeHavilland, but now things have ground to a halt. We had hoped that we'd be seeing either 1) a stop sign, 2) a reduction in the speed limit and /or 3) , a permanent "Your Speed Is..." flashing light (coupled with a little more Sheriffs patrol). Are any of those options in process at this time? Also, I'm wondering if the committee or city council is willing to at least limit truck size on Cox to no greater than is permitted on Hiway 85; that doesn't seem like to big a stretch. We understand a traffic study was done for the intersection. Has any conclusion been made as to how to proceed? Please advise. Thanks, Paul C. Miller 8/24/2005 Traffic Matrix #102 Dear John Thank you very much for your consideration. Regards, Jilhan Lin - -- John Cherbone <jherbone @saratoga.ca.us> wrote' > Dear Jillian, > We have added your request to our log of traffic issues which require > follow -up. We will keep you informed of the progress of your request. > We also will check the radar sign schedule and place one in the location you requested as soon ` as one is available. > The mirror request will require our City Traffic Engineer to make a > site visit to determine if it is the appropriate method of increasing > your sight distance onto Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road.. > > Sincerely, > John Cherbone > Public Works Director I > - - - -- Original Message-- ) From: Jillian_Eileen Lin [niailto:jillian eileen «yahoo.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 20051:21 PM > To: Lorie Tinfow > Cc: Sue Crimi; Rick Torres; John Cherbone; Kristin Borel > Subject: RE: Fwd: RE: City of Saratoga > > Thanks, Lorie. > jillian > 12750 Glen Arbor Ct. > Saratoga > 408 - 621- 1991/741 -4806 > > - -- Lorie Tinfow <ltinfow @saratoga.ca.us> wrote: > > > Jillian, >> > > Requests for a speed trailer and mirror go to our Public Works > > Department now and may go to the Public Safety Commission which is now called the Traffic Safety Commission. , > > I've cc'd John Cherbone and Kristin Borel (the two staff members who > > now support the > > Commission) on this message so they can determine the appropriate > > path. You'll hear back from one of them. > > Thanks. > Lorie >> >) - -- Original Message---- - > > From: Jillian_Eileen Lin [mailto:jillian eileen@yahoo.co > Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 9:54 AM > > To: Lorie Tinfow > > Cc: Sue Crimi; Rick Torres; Jillian -Yahoo Lin > > Subject: RE: Fwd: RE: City of Saratoga >, >> > > Lorie, >> > > Thank you... > > Do you know how we can get a temporary speed indicator set up near > > Woodmont (west of Glen Arbor Court) from Saratoga /Sunnyvaled Rd.'s > > direction? > > And ... Is it OK to install a mirror on the stop sign so I can see the > > uncoming > vehicles > > better? > > I have been startled several times by the traffic when I am trying > > to drive a sedan > out > > of the court. > > Thanks again. Kristin Borel From: steve allen [steveaspesi @yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 12:42 PM ro: Kristin Borel Subject: Speed humps for Aspesi Drive Hi Kristin, I receive your letter today regarding NTMP's funding being cut from the budget. Traffic Matrix ,#105 The neighborhood association of Aspesi Drive is interested in pursuing the installation of speed humps regardless of public funding. We would like to consider doing this with private funds provided by the people who will benefit from it. The issue we are trying to solve is reducing speeding traffic, much of which is "cut through" traffic driving from Quito Road to access Saratoga Avenue and Hwy 85. There are many children in our neighborhood who enjoy playing outdoors. Please let me know how I(we) can facilitate the installation of Speed humps on Aspesi Drive,with private funds. Thank you. Regards, Steven Allen 1710 Aspesi Drive aaratoga, CA 95070 408 - 866 -6625 home 408 - 464 -2433 cell c: Aspesi Neighborhood Association Steve Allen 18710 Aspesi Drive Saratoga, CA 95070 cell (408) 464 -2433 Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best seam protection around http: / /mail.yahoo.com 1 Parker Ranch Kristin Borel From: Frank Aochi [F.Aochi @fehrandpeers.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:04 PM To: Kristin Borel Subject: RE: Parker Ranch Attachments: Memo2- Parker Ranch.doc; Guardrail Map .pdf Page 1 of 2 Traffic Matrix ##107 .Hi Kristen, Attached is the second memo addressing guardrails for the Parker Ranch neighborhood. Please note that I need to review this matter further before I can provide recommendations. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Frank From: Kristin Borel [mailto:kborel @saratoga.ca.us) Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 10:32 AM To: Frank Aochi . Subject: RE: Parker Ranch Thanks Frank, Let me know when you have that completed, and I will forward it to Mr. Greenleaf. Kristin From: Frank Aochi [ mailto :F.Aochi @fehrandpeers.com] Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 10:27 AM To: Kristin Borel Subject: RE: Parker Ranch Hi Kristin, Yes he did have some suggestions for gpordraiIs and I did leave them out of the memo. I left them out because I felt we needed to take a look at some additional data such as accident reports in the last 3 -5 years. I also wanted to take some additional measurements to be sure adding a guardrail does not create a different potential hazard. I'll write a supplement to the memo that shows the areas Mr. Greenleaf wanted guardrails. Thanks, Frank From: Kristin Borel [mailto:kborel @saratoga.ca.us] 7/12/2005 I I Parker Ranch Page 2 of 2 Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005.9:44 AM To: Frank Aochi Subject: RE: Parker Ranch Hi Frank, Mr. Greenleaf was in today'to look at the memo. He was concerned that there were no recommendations about the edge of road barriers. He said that was the reason you both went out together was to review the lack of barriers, and the hazard this created. Do you have any notes or recommendations about this? Kristin 868 -1258 From: Frank Aochi [ mailto :F.Aochi @fehrandpeers.com] Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 3:45 PM To: Kristin Borel Subject: Parker Ranch Hi Kristin, Here are my recommendations for the Parker Ranch neighborhood. There are also photographs attached that go with the memo. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Frank Due to the potential that information exchanged by electronic media can deteriorate, be damaged, lost or modified, intentionally or otherwise, use of this electronic data by anyone other than Fehr & Peers Associates shall be at the sole risk of such user and without liability or legal exposure to Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. The recipient is responsible for verifying the accuracy of data against governing hard copy documentation. If there is a discrepancy between the.hard copy and the electronic copy, the hard copy will govem. Recipient assumes all risks in the changing or modifications of data and revisions or updating of hard copy documents. <<Memo1- Parker Ranch.doc>> <<Location Map.pdf>> «Photo- 9.pdf>> «Photo- 1.pdf>> <<Photo- 2.pdf>> «Photo- 3.pdf>> «Photo- 4.pdf>> «Photo- 5.pdf>> «Photo- 6.pdf>> «Photo- 7.pdf>> 7/12/2005 FEHR. &. PEER.S TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS . MEMORANDUM Date: July 12, 2005 To: Kristin Borel From: Frank Aochi Subject: Parker Ranch Neighborhood Traffic Management 1025 -446 -1 Mr. John Greenleaf had some suggestions concerning the installation of guardrails in the neighborhood. During our drive through the neighborhood he pointed out the locations he felt needed guardrails. He was concerned that vehicles traveling too fast or drivers not familiar with the area would drive off the road. He felt the guardrails would help keep them on the road. I feel we should address the problem of vehicles traveling too fast for conditions and providing clearer traffic controls to help inform the drivers. Installing guardrails in a residential neighborhood should be the last choice. Attached is a location map that shows the locations Mr. Greenleaf pointed out as areas he felt should have guardrails. A description of each location with my comments is presented below. We should check the accident data base for this neighborhood to see if there has been any history of vehicles driving off the road. I will need to get addition field measurements to see if a guardrail can be properly installed without intruding in the roadway area. I was unable to take all of the field measurements and photographs for these locations when l met with Mr. Greenleaf in April. 1. Parker Ranch Road at Vista Arroyo Court — Vista Arroyo Court ends at Parker Ranch Road forming a T- intersection. The three approaches are Stop sign controlled. Vehicles, approaching the intersection are coming downhill through an S- curve: A guardrail was suggested along the west side of Parker Ranch Road opposite Vista Arroyo Court to keep cars that are traveling too fast and unable to stop in time from going off the road and into a private yard. The problem that should be addressed is slowing down the vehicles before they get too close to the intersection. The approaching sight distance is very good and the Stop sign can be seen from a reasonable distance from the intersection. Does this location have a past history of vehicles going off the road? 2. Parker Ranch Road south of Vista Arroyo — There is a vertical drop off along the west side of Parker Ranch Road. A guard rail would provide a barrier preventing vehicles from going over the edge of the road. I will need to take some additional measurements of this location. 3. Parker Ranch Court south of Parker Ranch Road — There is a vertical drop off .along the west side of the road on the outside of a curve. I will need to take additional measurements of this location. 4. Continental Circle — There is a vertical drop off that is obscured by trees and shrubs along the north side of the road north of #21463. This section is on the outside of a curve. 255 Market Street, #200, San Jose CA 95110 (408) 278 -1700 Fax (408) 278 -1717 www.fehrandpeers.com Kristin Borel July 12, 2005 Page 2 of 2 f� FEHP. & PEERS TRANSFORTA710N CONSULTANTS A guardrail would provide a barrier preventing vehicles from going over the edge of the road. Continental Circle is a one -way street and vehicles are traveling uphill at this location. The trees and shrubs should be cut back to expose the concrete curb and gutter along this section of the road providing a visual line of the edge of roadway. Parker Ranch Court north of Continental Circle — There is a vertical drop -off along the west side of the road. Vehicles traveling southbound are going uphill approaching Continental Circle. This is not a curved section. There is a concrete curb and gutter along the edge of the road and I've recommended adding a double yellow center stripe on this section of the road to help highlight the intersection. Both the concrete curb and the center stripe should help provide adequate visual guides to drivers traveling on this section of Parker Ranch Court. 6. Parker Ranch Court at Continental Circle — Continental Circle ends at Parker Ranch Court forming a T- intersection. The Continental Circle approach is Stop sign controlled. A guardrail would provide a barrier preventing vehicles unable to stop at the Stop sign from going over the edge of the road. The Stop sign is hidden from view by a tree and shrub and the Stop legend is faded. The tree and shrub should be trimmed back and the legend repainted so they can be easily seen when approaching the intersection. 7. Star Ridge Court east of Picea Court — There is a vertical drop -off along the south side of the road on the outside of a curve. I need to get additional measurements for this location. 8. Comer Drive — Eastbound vehicles are traveling downhill and apparently as a result are traveling well above the speed limit. There is a curve in the road near #21245. A guardrail at this location would provide a barrier to keep vehicles on the road. There is an existing double yellow center stripe and a concrete curb and gutter on outside of the curve at this location. There is also deer warning sign and mature trees along the outside of the curve. The sight distance is very good for vehicles approaching the curve. Additional measurements are needed. At some of the locations the problem appears to be vehicles traveling too fast for conditions. The guardrail would help keep them on the road if they were to lose control of their vehicles. The guardrail could also redirect the out of control vehicle into the path of another vehicle. The focus of the traffic control should address the problem of drivers going too fast for this neighborhood or, lose sight of the road. Where conditions are hazardous the guardrail can be of use. These sights should be further reviewed to be sure that adding a guardrail does not create a different hazard. I will follow up this memo after I've completed my field measurements and have taken additional photos of these sights. Please let me know if you have any questions. FEHR & PEERS Transportation Consultants GUARD RAIL LOCATION MAP ��y „ 2005 FIGURE 1 fp FEHR. &-. PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS MEMORANDUM Dater July 7, 2005 To: Kristin Borel From: Frank Aochi Subject: Parker Ranch Neighborhood Traffic Management 1025 -446 -1 I met with Mr. John Greenleaf at his residence on Farr Ranch Court in April and he had some concerns about traffic safety in his neighborhood. He drove me around and pointed out the, locations he felt needed some additional traffic control. The problems he presented were cars traveling too fast, drivers getting lost and confused, and teens parking and loitering at the top of the hill. He mentioned that at one time a driver drove off of the hill. He felt the neighborhood needed additional Stop signs, Speed Limit signs, and guard rails. I pointed out that we would . need to identify what is causing the problems before we can address it. After our meeting I drove through the neighborhood again and surveyed the existing conditions and developed some recommendations. Listed below by location are my comments. A location map and photographs nurnbered.by location are attached. 1. Burnett Drive - Repaint the double yellow center stripe. The existing stripe is faded and is difficult to see. 2. Parker Ranch Road north of Vista Arroyo — The Stop Sign Ahead warning sign facing southbound traffic is blocked from view by trees and bushes. Trim the trees and bushes back to remove the sight obstruction. 3. South end of Farr Ranch Road — Install a Type N reflective marker sign panel at the end of the street. The existing wooden barrier at the end of the street is painted a dark color and is difficult to see at night.. 4. Parker Ranch Road and Parker Ranch Court Intersection — Install Type K reflective marker signs on the noses of the island to improve visibility when dark. 5. Continental Circle at Parker Ranch Court — The Stop sign for Continental traffic is blocked from view by trees and bushes. Trim the tree and bushes to remove the sight obstruction. Repaint the Stop legend, limit line, and double yellow center stripe. 6. Continental Circle and Parker Ranch Court Intersection — Install a Type N reflective marker sign on the west side of Parker Ranch Court opposite Continental Circle. The Continental Circle approach is downhill and curved and there is no street light at the intersection. The end of the road is not obvious to someone who is not familiar with the street, especially at night. 255 Market Street, #200, San Jose CA 95110 (408) 278 -1700 Fax (408) 278 -1717 www.fehrandpeers.com Kristin Borel July 7, 2005 Page 2of2 FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS i 7. Parker Ranch Court at Continental Circle - Install 50 feet of double yellow center stripe,on Parker Ranch Court on either side of Continental Circle to help highlight the intersection. Continental Circle is not visible to southbound drivers due to the vertical curve. 8. Picea Court at Star Ridge Court - Install a No Outlet sign at the entrance of Picea Court. The street is too narrow to make a U -turn. I did not take a photograph of this street. 9. South end of Chiquita Court = Install Type N reflective marker sign panel of the end'of the street. The existing wooden barrier at the end of the street is painted a dark color. The street is curved and the end is not easily seen after entering the street, especially at night. In general the existing striping needs to be restriped and the home. owners need to maintain their landscaping along the street. The above comments are to help enhance the existing traffic controls in the neighborhood. The nature of the streets in this neighborhood in itself provides a traffic calming affect. The streets are 24 feet wide with no formal sidewalks and wind through the hills. Please let me know if you have any questions. i 44 fFEHR & PEERS Transportation Consultants LOCATION MAP auy 7. 2005 FIGURE 1 i 4 4 y� Of a ,JiPn" ..: ,a „ate `. - • ��v'�x, r n �.�. ��'� 7 �P!' a ```�d ��..rc i "- 4 i-` ,R� ,'. _,.Si is is , a •" i F�;��{ ; ,y:� r ,`� -;i,�r >�� tam a f:: t rs s�� rr:9 ,a} ' �T�}Y¢�o;a. : a3 s�� g�.�.. e � � ;� �.. • Aiii`'`i t 1 � j ;a t �g � ': "�igx._: �,� •spa ,... � .. g, �!. � '"�. 'ya,,,��s S� �- k' '}"�'r rt �f • »�¢ ,y ; `,et I _jrt.. .. seCSr _ r * � - �h� ,. 1't"ia ��Iau � � t - �``t' =.wit �„ •: �' p � • -r � � .- .;`.: M - • Lk A , :f ,�� . ,. -.--- �- e..,.: 4 e. NA y� •rte ,� 5 3? i �'' " T7. k -z �Yj � �T��C� t!` � �' ®R,��'�$ � �`r�� #,� � 'e,,.� � z�• rte' � ,� Y _ TF s: • w 3MY' Yo tc: aq b s� �4 MA 3MY' ,, =�, ,::: t Kristin Borel From: Julie Daniel [Julie @matrixcable.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 10:45 AM To: Kristin Borel Subject: Fw: Pierce Road Traffic - - - -- Original Message - - - -- Page 1 of 1 Traffic Matrix ,#111 Kristin, Thank you for adding me to the agenda for the next Public Safety Commission meeting. As a long time resident of Pierce Road I have grown very concerned with the speed of traffic. I Five at 12881 Pierce Road, which is located on the lower section of the street near Saratoga = Sunnyvale Road':. I am concerned that the cars and trucks driving at excessive speeds puts our residents, their..children, pets and guests at undue risk. The posted speed limit is 30 miles an hour, however this speed can be easily reached in a very short distance and many drivers continue to accelerate beyond that. Taking into consideration that when walking up the street with a child or dog or riding a bike, a car traveling at 35 miles per hour feels fast and unsafe let alone a car or truck traveling at 40'+ miles per hour. I started this endevor two years ago only to discover that many of my•neighbors had been to the Public Safety Commission in the past. The Commission did make some change to the road at the bend, which is very dangerous when cars and trucks are speeding. I would like to further address the speed issues that would impact the straight away as well as the at the bend, the two go hand in hand. Please help me make this a safe stretch of Pierce Road to live on: Sincerely, Julie Daniel 8/24/2005 To: Lorie Tinfow /Danielle Surdin, City of Saratoga From: Sohrab Rashid, P.E. Date: December 18, 2003 Subject: Pierce Road (Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road to Surrey Lane) — Accident and volume Warrants for Stop Signs 1025 -446 -1 Fehr & Peers has reviewed the reported accident data and traffic counts as part of the preliminary evaluation of traffic operations on Pierce Road. This evaluation was initiated at the request of Pierce Road residents and will be included with other data and observations to identify appropriate measures for consideration in this corridor as part of a Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) process. Some residents have requested that stop signs be installed -on Pierce Road to slow traffic. This memorandum presents some background information on the study segment and summarizes our review of the accident data and current volumes as they both relate to stop sign warrants. Background Pierce Road is designated a collector street in the City's General Plan as it serves traffic to and from the hillside areas located in the western portion of Saratoga. The road does not include vertical and curb and gutter along most of the study segment (i.e., north of Surrey Lane) and in many places vehicles park on the shoulders or open areas next to the road. Measurements taken at several locations show that the combined traveled lane width is approximately 22 feet. In some areas, a paved shoulder of several feet is also provided. During the recent Citywide speed survey update, the speed limit on the section of Pierce Road from Surrey Lane to Mt. Eden Road was reduced from 30 miles per hour (mph) to 25 mph due to the changes in vertical (hills) and; horizontal (curves) alignment on this section.. The section between Surrey Lane and Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road was maintained at 30 mph. Residents have indicated that some vehicles continue to travel at excessive speeds on the study segment of Pierce Road that is posted for 30 mph. Several residents have reported incidents Where speeding vehicles have crashed into fences and trees because they couldn't negotiate a curve in the road, or where it was difficult to cross the street to get to a mailbox because of speeding traffic. Recent speed surveys conducted on Pierce Road indicate 85th percentile speeds of 37 to 40 miles per hour along the study segment, where the 85th percentile speed is the speed at and below which 85 percent of vehicles are traveling. This measure is a standard engineering threshold. Previous and current requests have included the installation of stop signs on Pierce Road at Comer Drive and Paramount Court in an effort to slow vehicles. As noted in the October 9, 2003 Public Safety Commission meeting, stop signs are not recommended speed control devices since their purpose is to designate right -of -way (Source: Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Millennium Edition, Page 26 -8). Stop signs are appropriate where vehicles on the side street need an adequate gap in traffic or in cases where visibility of approaching traffic is severely limited. In both cases, accident data can be helpful in identifying operational problems where stop signs may provide an appropriate solution. The review of reported accident data is presented below followed 255 N. Market Street, Suite 200 San Jose, CA 95110 (408) 278 -1700 Fax (408) 278 -1717 www.fehrandpeers.com by an evaluation of volume warrant criteria for all -way or multi -way stop signs (i.e., stop signs on all intersection approaches). Accident Data Accident data over a three -year period is typically reviewed to provide an illustration of potential safety issues and patterns of operational problems. For this study, accident data from the Santa Clara County Sheriff's office between January 1999 and October 2003 or nearly a five -year period was reviewed. A summary of the accident data on Pierce Road is shown below by location and date in Table 1. Table 1 Number of Reported Accidents on Pierce Road Location 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 (Jan -Oct) Total Saratoga - Sunnyvale Rd. 4 3 1 7 5 20 Paramount Ct. 0 0 0 0 1 1 Foothill Ln. 1 0 0 0 0 1 Comer Dr. 0 0 0 1 0 1 Houston Ct. 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 Bella Vina 1 1 0 0 1 3 Surrey Ln. 0 0 1 0 0 1 As shown in Table 1, the location on Pierce Road with the most prevalent accident problem is the intersection of Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road. This location has already been identified as a problem location because of the intersection design and abrupt changes in grade. However, reconstruction ' of this intersection is a major infrastructure project that will be undertaken when funds are available. All but one of the remaining locations has one reported accident over the last five years. Three accidents have occurred at or in the vicinity of Bella Vina during this period. From a traffic engineering perspective, none of these locations (excluding the Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road intersection) are considered to have an "accident problem." This conclusion is based on the MUTCD warrant for all -way stop control that addresses accidents, which requires a minimum of five (5) accidents in a 12 -month period that are "susceptible to correction by a multiway stop installation." Volume Warrants for Multiway Stop Control The MUTCD warrants for multiway stop sign installation also require a volume of at least 300 vehicles per hour (vph) in both directions on the major street (Pierce Road) and at least 200 combined vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians per hour on the minor street for any 8 hours of an average day. Minor streets would include Paramount Court and Comer Drive. The traffic counts conducted in October 2003 show that the two -way volume on Pierce Road only exceeds 300 vph during two to six hours during the day depending on the segment. Although detailed counts have not been conducted on Paramount Court and Comer Drive, these streets are not expected to have a combined vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian volume of 200 per hour for 8 hours based on the number of residences and other traffic generators. Conclusions and Recommendations The results of the reported accident data for the last 5 years show that the only location on Pierce Road with a consistent operational problem is the intersection at Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road. Of the six public street intersections west of this location to Surrey Lane, all but one location have only one 2 reported accident in the five -year period. Three accidents were reported at or near Bella Vina, but no year had more than one accident. These rates do not meet the criteria for multi -way stop sign installation at any location. In addition, traffic volumes Pierce Road and all of the, side street approaches (including bicyclists and pedestrians) do not meet the minimum criteria for the installation of stop signs on Pierce Road. Measures other than stop signs on Pierce Road should be considered for reducing travel speeds since since: 1) stop signs are not warranted on Pierce Road from, a volume or accident standpoint, and 2) they are not recommended as speed control devices: Other traffic control measures will be developed and discussed as part of the NTMP process. 3 Page 1, of 1 Lorie Tinfow To: Julie Daniel Cc: Danielle Surdin Subject: RE: Lower Pierce Road Traffic Thanks for the email, Julie. The neighborhood that we discussed as being next in line has taken steps to start collecting signatures. Please feel free to contact me at any time to check your status. In addition, I am copying Danielle Surdin on this email as a back up. Lorie Tinfow - - - -- Original Message - - -- From: Julie Daniel [mailto:julie @matrixcable.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 6:48 PM To: Lorie Tinfow Subject: Lower Pierce Road Traffic Dear Lorie, I understand that our neighborhood on Pierce Rd. from Comer to Saratoga - Sunnyvale does qualify for the NTMP program. I am asking that we be formally placed in line. I will wait to hear from you in Feb. to know when you would like me to collect signatures from my neighbors. Thank you for answering all of my questions and listening patiently to my concerns. Sincerely, Julie Daniel 12881 Pierce Road 1/21/2004 Lo DR r J O l P ry t GR co VINA , F 01 f i ele� 0 VE "I'll, , C�� LEONARD RD r City of Saratoga Existing Roadway Volumes and Speeds F E H R PEERS on Pierce Road TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS October 2003 Table 1 Existing Roadway Volumes and Speeds Average Mid -Week Saturday! da Average Sunday3 Average Seed 85 "' Percentile Percent Traveling Week S eed >30m - ph s Location Dir. Volume Volume Volumes (mph) P Pierce Rd EB 2374 2331 2071/1852 35 40 87 %° (east of Paramount) WB 2377 2353 2027/1838 34 39 4684 4098/3690 Total 4751 75 Pierce Rd EB " 1981 2020 1898/1882 33 38 (between Bella Vina & WB 2003 1807/1749 1984 34 gg 77 Houston) Total 3965 4023 3705/3631 37 ., .. 67 % EB 1851 1877 1778/1716 32 Pierce Rd 1593 1725/1666 33 37 6$ (between Surrey & The WB 1880 3770 3503/338.2 Bend) Total 3731 - 381 349/304 n/a n/a n/a Pierce Rd EB 376 n/a n/a (north of SR.9) WB 432 433 488/407 n/a Total 808 817 837/711 Notes: Monday through Friday average volume. Z Average of Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday data only. These are the typical days studied for traffic studies. . Saturday and Sunday volumes only. Average (mean) speed of vehicles. Includes speed measurements on all days. e 85"' percentile speed. This is the speed that 85- percent of the vehicles travel at or below and is typically used to enforce the speed limit. The defacto or prima facie speed limit on a typical residential street is 25 mph. c Percentage of total vehicles exceeding 30 mph during entire one week survey period. . 1.2991'PIERCE , _ .._. _... _ rFOOTHILL - SA R 801 Accident, A R 1i PIERCE "injury . SA R 801 'Accident, injury A R 1: PIERCE SARATOGA SUNNYVALE PIERCE SA R 812'Hit -run, property damage A R ; 1 - COMER �, rPIERCE �SARATOGA SUNNYVALE _..._ SA R 81 y Dui accident _._:. .... .. . SA —k; 817 Dui accident q R ` t A ,1: 2002 Sheriff Office Confidential Page 5 i Fr - -,i ChY. 2003 Sheriff Office Confidential Page 6 2000 Sheriff Office Confidential Page 3 2001 Sheriff Office Confidential Page 4 1998 Sheriff Office Confidential Page 1 1999 Sheriff Office Confidential Page 2 Pierce Road Sign Inventory and Review December 11', 2003 By Fehr & Peers Location 1 — Keep Right sign: Sign faces eastbound traffic and is clearly visible. Sign can be misleading since it is normally used to instruct drivers to stay right of a median island, but there's a pork chop island used at this location. The roadway actually curves to the right and intersects with Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road. The pork chop island separates the southbound right turn into Pierce from the eastbound lane. We recommend replacement of the "Keep Right" signs with a chevron sign (Caltrans W81) pointing to the right. In addition, a W5 sign should be installed approximately 200 feet west of the curve for eastbound traffic. Location 2 — 30 MPH Speed Limit sign: Sign faces westbound traffic and is minimum size. Sign is clearly visible to traffic. No pavement legend is used with sign. No change needed. Location 3 — Curve Warning 20 MPH sign: Sign faces westbound traffic and is minimum size. Sign panel is wrong shape for warning signs. It is rotated 45 degrees to form a square sign rather than typical diamond shape used for warning signs. Sign is clearly visible but is too far in advance of curve. Combination W5 and W6 signs should replace the existing sign. Location 4 — Curve Warning 20 MPH sign and Chevrons: There are two curve - warning signs. One faces westbound traffic and the other northbound traffic. both are wrong shapes. sign and chevrons are clearly visible to westbound and northbound traffic. Foothill Lane tees with Pierce Road at this location. Combination W5 and W6 signs should replace the existing signs. Location 5 — Deer Warning sign: Sign is clearly visible to southbound traffic. No change needed. Location 6 — Curve Warning 20 MPH sign: Sign faces northbound traffic and is minimum size. Sign panel is wrong shape. Sign is in the shadow of a nearby tree during the day but is visible to traffic. Combination W5 and W6 signs should replace the existing sign. Location 7 — 30 MPH Speed Limit sign: Sign faces southbound traffic and is minimum size. Sign is partially blocked by tree limbs. Need to trim nearby tree and bushes. No pavement legend used with sign. Pruning tree is recommended. Location 8 — Curve Warning sign: Sign faces eastbound traffic and is correct shape. The sign is clearly visible. Construction activity next to the sign may have caused it to lean to one side. Sign post should be reset. Location 9 — 30 MPH Speed Limit sign: Sign faces eastbound traffic and is minimum size. Sign is clearly visible to traffic but bushes are growing around the post. No pavement legend used with sign. Bushes should be trimmed to prevent sign from being blocked by future growth. Location 10 Pedestrian Crossing, Bicycle and Next 1 Mile Warning signs: Three sign panels on one post facing westbound traffic. Signs are clearly visible and are correct shapes. No change needed. Location 11 — Road Narrows and Next X Miles Warning signs: Sign faces westbound traffic but is blocked from view by nearby bushes. Trim bushes. DR O N O F �0 i 4�, FEH.1� PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS �t M M � Q) U Q) C), 00 City of Saratoga Existing Roadway Volumes and Speeds on Pierce Road October 2003 e� 01� e e N k1- RD Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 E-M, 5A Location 4 Westbound Location 4 Northbound 4 �5 a `' i nratinn S Location 7 Location 8 Location 9 iV v R� S y�+��'� r�r _ • '�' = , its , � e� . `a • - � "�� Nina a.;!:� �' _ ... VC. i� �•�.i;..;� 7 4 ., "�'��ii `t a � y. Location Table 1 Existing Roadway Volumes and Speeds Average Mid -Week Saturday/ Weekda Average Sunday Average Seed 85th Percentile Percent Traveling Location Dir. Volume Volume Volumes' mph Speeds > 30 mph 6 Pierce Rd EB 2374 2331 2071/1852 35 40 83% (east of Paramount) WB 2377 2353 2027/1838 34 39 77% Total 4751 4684 4098/3690 ^ Pierce Rd EB 1981 2020 1898/1882 33 38 75% (between Bella Vina & WB 1984- 2003 ..... 1807/1749 - 34 39 77 Houston) Total 3965 4023 3705/3631'__ R- V ; :A' y Pierce Rd EB 1851 1877 1778/1716 32 37 67% (between Surrey & The WB 1880 1893 1725/1666 33 37 68% Bend) Total 3731 3770 3503/3382 Pierce Rd EB 376 381 349/304 n/a n/a _ n/a (north of R 9) VVB 432 433 488/407 n/a n/a n/a Total 808 817 837/711 Notes: Monday through Friday average volume. 2 Average of Tuesda Y. Wednesday, and Thursday data only. These are the typical days studied for traffic studies. ` a Saturday and Sunday volumes only. Average (mean) speed of vehicles. Includes speed measurements on all days. ' 85'" percentile speed. This is the speed that 85- percent of the vehicles travel at or below and is typically used to enforce the speed limit. The defacto or prima facie speed limit on a typical residential street is 25 mph. e Percentage of total vehicles exceeding 30 mph during entire one week survey period. 160 140 120 100 U 0 80 /d/•� i� •� We 20 L Pierce Rd- Between Surrey & The Bend ..PC Tr �� Rk. CI.L` -�+' t� `�:. �, C 6 � i,%� ".t�.� . "YY ^: .• �,� 7f.. §y > Ai. §, n',. �. � .:'r :,i, ,,, .. h,:a.,t. ,. �h'. �,~ai •�:, r� 3�.vy, $k8y�,: x�b„r ...' ,f�� \ #� ... i ? "'9' 7y q# g��f5'} � kid {,.l:E K.'Y kk.)r ry:',�i�.,'.Itx i. .{,k .ts -�, v� <!r ::.i,1. �L,, ((. �Kyyy' `+ �i 3a - �'.' �i :.3 tl� 3 @r� $2t �X. �,�..pts � � ,4�ftP .i.. f }}+ �.;.a {x y!9..`k .ri - � S�`.!�'Sa`.... �[!' � ..x:•TJ 8 fiK3'3� q iE £n i..-r�� ..�.. :lY. ��R � :%'4.1.'�3 r f� _� .�f •bL y� i�`'t �.: ^, �� § �. S% i �.,.:� _ � ( a >, �, „q�.ggy; !i�� f HA. Y ,:. j t i r�i'ir7Z l.. i�r }� 'f- - .+r..X_�% q. � � �'f t "!C� -i:e 'Cf,. § 1 '�i1 ��: � [ {' +ffy'�f�.� Y ,a j..,�.x 'j� f'yyS .[[ FJy'q¢. §§$$ {{�� +'2 °. k 3�.y '.x«.:.9'7 yx pd•J i1R, p }j y fi t,,: i � +. �P V� ��,;.., iS� ...�J,ltk f .fi,. �. t' i.'3"ISY5��1C�.fr �l+ +h.f. �.:•�r.. LJ:- V r��(.:. \YS'S:i tR•1T,�v. �,'. .. + #p.� f. �' 'tz�f �..Y�. t Ef {S�F'1 - {�tr'it: .T'rYi, is ». :.. ;.,Y " - Y% Y , �P -� D'.7 s.`,.tR.M = >;xii�e x .4Y � .<� yy. �]w.. -L. r.ti.. �i ,1��.s.:� . +��E <.. �i.:, i�. 'g - r -' pY' �I � i�i7E,i°.. F � JNt3,'4:.; •kt.. i't?tY �" '�F CC YY f' M � i ::. � i •� ; S. Iy �yg'.#'� �' i {S• *.' �'Y`S� F � 1 � �� . � fi�t'y;(� yS� �'k -•:S � +.�. '. § .. �'. <: �K 1 �'A�� b �.:�§ .i:.v� i �'', ,��i.l 4LL.3.�S Kh rt! .t�!r,t. .3''iil �'�k�..> Vl V�1 {�j,�;i:Q , E;: t 1�1:3ft'4.' �c: :�� ,:.i �,NS {jQ: $, i'.F .. cr.�. a FrT•�.f ��_ _ 4A� . ��ii:f24t �ei' �t :yya,i + ;f�':Rk�`r, ...�..�x�l'.�i:' . *` �...,, }Y: e# .!�i, Ctlit±[ Ykiie.�,'� t'•F - }d�'��''{{S x}t �,� � t r18�c��L�u+ � '�X�'i�� t�es� S i �� [� #�� y�[� � �''�y'�� .: �' .- . {.�5�, i. �+•�Y.5 4 -v.� sl�,"' '#t��.� p, t}[t rh 7� f � t 7 ,.°� �. �f _ (Y ! #if �'.' - ?.!s?:. 1�i• f 1 �','tt. ; "iF£ k`�.'. �. � i,+.(. %� ..I r.:s'�x,{ 5 !.'••.rf:p ty Ei Xi +emu � # d''�'& (. •�N. �� ; ^2 �::Ye n�UJ '° Y X'?5 f: K:� y3/,, �;.� ti A z, - }t.fii'a .7, •ice }36$,cr #- `4.3t # }rif{M #g�~ : "` .'<+i,1 SE. 'i1 7 �i " {1j'.,.. .�,�1 t.;•s�y. y. §6..'ki'% r 3t .:i1' -. �S�xa a, #i, �: :# t P�.:}1S F�,.. � g ;�.�� r �.$}}q�'S > ♦ 4: � y i;.. '^"5 '� t�(. r> „C}�•,, �i {�.t�. n� � 'f A°iY"i$+' � i r..:��: s .h R.. '.. � .,T... - .µ�Xpy$ x .S`:..� P 9 s. rti..i��:a 2 R t T*Y} /},. "'S+�'^ R r p;° }' ..T.. +.FaF V�+_.. R,• ,�-'iv '§ }"..55 �. 5 .+r AS:.` F^�t^:�f . ,: Ry�::!z °E'« �. '�y��.i -.Y %:�� gp�p' �A a3`ra3d.• 4 7 X,. � £ q� +i ,yykk n+E ':•- ��s ¢¢�.. F` ix : * -.�� Y.. R h i r`e�,.G F �- � �, 7, Ty%�. i�r,� {... 4. i f �'pp _'y i �'' a 5{ 5,�, a. :.. *,'.`� yg +n.�°+ppi�' rt i r«� 11.'�t g�, ?! ;�' b 4ti.£tg� � �5(¢�.y�` . -.�•�i � p� Figq" { s��_gjY r, 'A^. {yy k? # '''af �, .t -y ".�j 6 l:x 4.•+, ]%'� ti is` jj9'. ._P;!?t.� ." i:', �4 : �5 �'..�- 'F�i t+. �.�, t �I��'�.�:?�,".,. 3 a � ?'S ?. k: -S�R�K 1.{" r�iht: �,�`qS. kN,�> :T.+.��4: >.'��+Tpr�.iw�'�I. >,.. s ..r. �p ='xtf..�i l��`. x�:F "� `1.� Y is ;��`tp'3.,�.�'1 ..� ",.tr „�.��1' T•.'� ir.r_.2rr �.:{.:. t+ k >.(!t` ,��'Ifi. ,� � ts,,ae(.� f t � -?! `xx;; �<.YY-f.. ��:. . #•?�� >S9 E,��{,rh=x:x E r. �ttg #p¢ gar ry t�': Z �S' ��' � p(q[1 €� @x� 4.� y, -,4 Yi a `s�a -`;' �Y k X +;� ,�A� a -. fF 1''�,3� q��i. �yf.':k�14� ar�5•'''"'GY��,+��6 � :��YJx.. T t:at,f , r �t. f.'tJX� .y„_�,' �' ''� � U �`+ ;,.�;� ;:.x r.�... }a.,1, s.., 7 �. .,s:.x�+� .0 ,,�- �'•rt � .; �.,.{{ JR :�� -,>«tr {.•w.��"''a a.�'i3 _ -�,� nr§ {�s :;�.•7f;7 �.,C �i `.i. r�Y ;. r['•: ..F,',rP. p ��..f i .{3 {y , }.t..7� n.,, vt -..7: 4SS =: Yi sSiC . i'}'1.¢H.xt"� s° .ct!?�x,sf.7�• 1t.- S4`.�i }. .js ElK3 �'4 ' b...Y• *- ��^=.;r f. g �r�•z��t* eN. 't 1 7 t�.� ^t Xt3_t3 Sf R� v +�b. +, R3k`s .._J e �4, � •.ay� } ;tF �' _ L 4. {. ), .. t".,F £,� ia.4f>Yfr h ;�} i �� Ape:.l s�,�`'_a. Y. .k:.- ff+. �. , 1 -.. .•r.. �. s � .y✓ .�.:N. ... z2,.� _,. �' "7't „�} x.�:J3 �'17��`3�r �• 7.a,Y� a,'t ?: ., aa.%:Ut�Z :� .. SF:Y• �� @kjI :�8q�4. y}...� 1g��y°$�'.;3EY�i?'�+i+71'gA�'t �d - YfiF��d�b %`�9•�(�S "t �1•L�1}'.. ,� .t4,1t " ",2.�i ��1X �5�.. d3 5xi t!��v}�i. #f�. �a'ar f.� �r:.. a1 .� ....3. 4. .{��:r. e ti, �t#.:"�.�r ";F ,s, .r'^ .,x � ?2 } }� �gy i�r_ 'f�t{¢¢� }• .C: �...�yr�r •:fla v,� pL� -��a, �'S�'}$�:try¢ F9 D,. �.' 7a•KR 5� rrf. tf ��`� Ytr .?q� ¢"§ �.:nY S"� �.. iiF +oC��A.' a'+ i4 \tt� Y+b 3 t.r +.� Y �.7 „5. ,Y �i { 5� "N ,q� ,ri a�% &• f. y{:i',: i' ^�� 3�.+�� -.:Y�" 3£�A78.:.: ?F it s. §i '��. {•. „�' -S. -X -�5 fj .._�' . ;z� . � tl:%..Y � Es ., . .M< _ -��S' �... .. ��5, qy #3e, =ice §7� a ' R '{p1i's �.,g- N tQ "a4 a.. r.:il: � � -,.a f�in.¢1,.t - �•.�`�+ y s� '• k �`•� � i y '2,.. n. ?, .. } x � E:\t. � y,S 3 S x r; ` �f. S �. 1 �'i �Y .. �.. f 7 i't,?{ y f t 1'�l � � (,f;.,f1 'k Yy.�p�! .��L' � t'i � t�L +'.f`.r yY. S.iE .��.... �{i�(��4)jFVC ��i7 ��Y $`1'!' l�s+i _� {.. -0)' }�...-j. Y- � 4 Ti�KY' [s! i % •� { �{�':,��3� [1,.: ..� �:E gRl, ;.:1 r� � riE .J.. ti[ fA`f` � i�.0 �' � L a�� .: ?t ,,.;_K s [, _.yt es. -.�::; }�. yf�>!'. x ,� 4t£ :' {r §.:.ffc C, '_g.f -4 4� ,`FL`LYrr£ >;xj .r_: ! h�. ii'a §•p :at�:� 5z Rdx4 .� ,. s: �?i.- <<+'rrt - kt -= s S'' :. t ..:.s.r, 1 l ,...# sj� C x. � � � : G�a .7`i.:. f`•a�p .s �i.� .i �f E .t 17 3: } �..J `.i � #('.,`ri ��:.:: .. �� iaFf.ic :.�.: i�. v:r•.s,. a ,< ..<'e e � c . ._3€ :: kr, ..�a',6 $ok ?s, rff 'i r•: ,t� � :,�,. r :�_ � t >.. � iC - � , .. �,t�il+. � .< r ..: � �: •3 . .:..,.t x. ='a tb 'a�: .,. 4�at „ ? .:i.'T 7Yy :7n?!. e. t- .. #w'. :5 ,., -,. -4 .;• R P. , , I..:£.. ". aas.;x' {t € 3r t 6 3nfEI }, a Y ta �i a >rA f.7 ; G111 -�4 - +.. ROM : i•� �S .. �rn, �`if � � :S" g �' � {� X 4- '. ,�+, .,� Y � %i } "�3JI �P��j ��3 s.:q �•> J c. 1 } 2 k�%rf1 � � S,v 2 fr' x � Ys1 i"' �• - 2'- 'Sn -: _ys.; I x x:Y= 4ci- , .�_:?x e [ ;(. 'r, r-r �. ;,��ix''FF"" ' � ;��+ r��. �a j_ , �a�a� �,�,.:� .�'}j�t j�p,.`' i,.&N�,:�x vcy #k� r�fj, { #yX � &� ��ik _s }�, � ➢,�'?e'j,�t- �! rw, 1-F $..•.'s t'q+� F:<.:ay'�itb �$k;;t ,g' f - �� k � ;i 7�f .i 1 ex . r R t � +_ .� A .. . t �:.` ` ' 3 �. x €� Y�si�r ,:�. '� . �',,� t: �. � z "S .i,,,t . �' t 'i�}'P �'� �i"4� '�'•�:.: n�a `�_ � 'aj: .S:c�ii b1 +.kr� 3 x�as�`� '��,; 3_ : � _ . y¢ xa# �� ,�.` t • � �� k,, -- a r �. , C 'y4`"ri` ��tt �� 3� r � sx "KS ¢¢xx E au' ,� .*:' a E'� �x. � a ��•tK)) ¢ 9 � RnE1fEFe�rf: C.hf^ L .� i �a �£ .f, fy ,k R 8�i{,* ��Ay f t `)"+�L t: Z� +Yr ��' C $r; .::. i +.Q 3 T f : �"�^' }A 4 {�� 6p x'.�? A4� ',:l `'{ >t'ES"!"i ? %i.`a'+� t ^. � k �F.a� i;.- � �9?t . � 4 �. ; +`4� i "r•r -y�ia =; ��tCx }��y,,p$ �''�,�4g1':d:�: :.',G .i ,`` _ �.. �fYSIk 4 TS41r x+:. .•"xd3 unkS t.,.�'. #4n.4�1+��u,..� . s�.,�n'�� x,�rsis�s:�..� t oa..:.�.isi ;t. ;; ,.� �. . .. ": ( fi.�....: dk�r �.�a� «:. Kfiiz 53b4.,x��a.� � o•,:'. 3s$3� 1xs <x� §� �r: . '�, iz -.- s 5rd .�.::, R 0.:1¢ & �.�. „.t �' r "�.. fzk fr.!..,.?. �: :. k£'4 ��'. 3'"a -�' �. � �+ "�'3, �$ .k�x��a"! �,�,. t+: 3 �..x 24� ,�'.t%.,`sG•S & }£h :z;3 �� {,` ' k. sg "?" r� 3.s$�, ; 4... ,:;' 'k.e.: .. t >'Y �..- ='s.s: s �=''� •.:5,:''hcsr # +, e x { s °a ,q.3a ,r.= F..., '�# � 3 ..k„ 7 ,. -,•�$ - ;=:a.. r. �' Ci,'A fi.. i.., .Jlt.. <. 'a, i'#` #i"x .g$ - Y',}•;ds'v v. .1' - _}�'vy'".ir tur` §>t? z .r -'.:b' !i::. .hRgr'L,..ra z;.+..;:;. v� �a.r" ��t �. 5 . T• 4yQ r: t ��d7 Yt' i 'S 11 � tn',.�"� a'Ya> .'3..: +s` �[[ � �. i £? s '.? p }3T ' s4" : e - ', . fi r, n 4Ys.. aa�'y i! gg af, y� f n -5.�' a �ci..� `3r%k8 i� yti< Ri a 'Y 4 ti. Fr �k ac %4aY•t ac. } itp +2 }.y g .," I,7l�h'a,yiA 'M x ?ti�'� § #ur •.. � t�(sE` � �,"`... }.. �it � :r ir��. :'i � �t" dLy &Eye��$YX _y .5'g a -,r,�l � ;;i•ir ff�,x$� � �>::�. +��, ,� ri }•{+Lit'C.��+�',{.. ,i�m.Gg�¢6 r��y�'{ ,: -,:: . . i 5,, ., t., .r � a •.� _... � ;.R z::, >: x � .e f' Ya: . za ' u �a .a.' s si.`.. a. . , a R:,.? �.�, ..`•` }x, i c ,L� s ,� zt �;;: , & � i ":�: ` �� . ..:y, �Y qqx.�. °��d ^{ �A :y �Y,...s:. � < � k � � •#yp� �: > �'� ��: ;8�� ` dy¢.�3 �� §� � ') � ahe�,�:� {' ii.t .may ?. �# .'w�v��x . �� i:q..�. :fi z b... E uE;a �� hF 'i :, '• *v� } � Y, #iE �:}}'w cY•,y. H 2f. }. Ff � e,R 'k' x 2t � {t t � ?. s '�. Al '�. :- "�'k'+.1 .c4 :fix c Sx. =..} 4x big .. i ♦`L'<' ... }ax_y ira {q $}�R{x�� : }(r, iFX }�£"£ # { ° u.Y�f��3¢yk'�� -� ,.y =�.a. t` � �'�:.. .;;yy�$'�@ k�5. +�y s.. xr•X'l� "w;p.,• ei Yff?,`, }:ate `� as; -t.� .�:$�t�rrr::k,p s� b $ }y��5� 3 §��:.rr �i '�� ' -:c_ 'L�i,'rf '..$ R� � $ Y 'R.. 'b 1 � .% k „q�'i ty �. ii... � i FS ): 3 R.44� �'.. -�1��`y'$,i��'d�a 6 +u.F,. i 1S $'.p �i '�i.Y °' ✓?: � 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7. PM Time of Day -� 0 -25 mph -- 25 -30 mph 30 -35 mph 35 -40 mph - >40 mph 160 140 120 100 U 0 80 W M Z 60 40 20 U Pierce -Rd East of Paramount Y3- 3s {e+�s'r # �. 1k ti3 °N €P:. � t.` t 3i•. },tAt �'(y� -,5k 1 � s `TrCii �- �5.�� r.,'s:�3. � •,_ �- �'a+.�._' � �+*� ��M� ti�a. Y ii'1�- .,,3'r ir,, Yea j k +o- _?t r,' �� #�� r � � #r s >F �x n+ � ��x � i� (` is y �. 3' �� ;. ��,r � >r� >}.i, ��..� > �t � t e • :��r�; -- � � X E� }q b "f�� ,E {i.,w 3 � [a:'£�.F i �. ��' ,yz�Z+-.d- �3�s��£� �'4 gym' {`k�?�3 �y �`�� -t'. •F. cw•'. "'r,� � ,;.y -�.� {41.i • -fz�� sa f x s r��yy�l�k€- -. s �7crr�yZ��c•i%�� Er 6,(%�'�f�iyt.� .i i[§ k aJ:tf � . x' n�Fdia3tiF '�_a §= 2'��"��"}�Fi�hr -kz(� 1 ik'lt��<i�Y"��L'-- ^#?"��, t.��§�s�•- �.3�� °:r-3 ��cti5 ��E3. yes, 'Fa��£��" us-. z. .7• "Fss' i5 },Y k }�.y x� y3r_;�?y2k$�,$ W. >4- 'Aii- irii.i' v "`n � •�� fk!�<`_ #�.`'•t y f : ti- 52�,.' i vil W; j 'N' ��: •;: �` c t i Sr .' •. t.. :Fn ofLL t'xa � '� � �I�k :s #' kl t• } i; S, t zx -:E �' 'h'Y''.'; U }a A �}SSa?.i IFS�i ff.. ikic {)}'. C� �{' ..5 '�Q 4 2 - 4- scxw£' r -R' u3y tsg.,;[p�'Ffi ,{,�� {',� y 7 -�` -.'y ��h.Yt'E{;:FFl.� Sa _..� 3'.��'3bM� n_4.z"�s crya'}°,3F2�� s�' sxr za : �'�3�x+'+z�.�s,;s.: � r�':5� "1.'k1�`��l,iG�e!F�a, .K�i�."'S n. X3 +�. }. Y ice'} t Y '.•;,• i :s�f- l 'xs S .. /�'Sk.2 Y'. �� "„ }iT ,iri T.chP�' -•t s, '; n 8 h I� "{'y S�{ b} i :k 'i`+f �jmi •..-f 4£.• `St'i, b (i:i p sy FJu: i•; 1 i { "'!. ..#tT" L$} 3 ,c`� [�' `' .yln 1 '`z3 ''`` a• ' # „ 4 c s ti'�#� � a � �Q sErsY r , }#�r� RIM, 3r ,��:. 'C b £y, P 3 ,�' ? i } .rl 'E 3,. 41, . s fti r s a a aax-T INY N sad' i i�$ � 3 '� �: wF ¢'3• }. +•'? f'4 x'ff< $, Rd.: F R'$5w� ri s'° '3�i �` �� -r s Mt. a ,-.'R ,- ;,�Y b gggg ,. r ..'} �.. " i #, n8,�r;•t '3 `i,- x;t y}k. � Tit '�' �r � �1 � .•+ - , � �r -_ 39 L'.r'fi �,..,:;�• F�' .�sr¢i�'s q .. 3 #,..� 4x #'%�.:��t ..,�i,��ir't'�.#4c t L '� g. t � 3,'e:ri }lr j #yVL� xh.-, .Ls�.rS�: � �:ri .. . -: � �5.'SS � ;.- 'G.,''' {1�.. �� %'-Y. Y�i n�a � ".�V, ¢¢�y � �b p 1ii �� -�i•t i �, .,i � �R3�i, y-.. ��' � -' Fi,�k3�5 x' aY ilx'S.i S;LF r ;z' r rtr # . }: t �i'.x; wB S ,� �a.:.:�. L� ��us{+1'� Y�.. _ f.�� ..z,: YkY"f: ge4'� i�� t z s :•- �.� '.[°'e 5 k �';t., .�`��: .. , g ,5��1 F�{$�' 4g VA k k �l 4� rte:.. :•�i -8.$' .' �r.YY k- >.3 " 3 ;a't7`t w.3 k s tr'}. pEa�as I-g •.�5, c £ �k # � f1,9•�tt c 9� s " ��,tj}4r. fa : � x .x4 �i £. ��, 3�}.��$� - - k{ S<.€i .. � � 1 .; ir R , sL i�2 � 't� •i i � �� d l,M ,'t.� :r';. R�-. f � -� � . � z• �7 ' � L� 'yatiXs i ? .x - s � . r s- fF .7 ��'� `�..� ' �,. _C s g � � a�_.`:,�j# j 22 } is � .. § x. Y 5 � ,e "I ' . 3€ _" �T -A y: �� $ J.�K r '� : �S ii:"� 4�f '.t'�>��d 3 ✓..+��j'��P F'� - � �$ �:�'t '�'i�i'"� tg i��a �"r � �z � lflr i� � {3 +Y._$FS �f• � Tk -i4�°` , e'c' K� iii �' ;i € �� ' §�� #, x # i�° a' ' f '# � '�� T ,.�t'�1`. �" � f k i` � r r.�� c . *�� '� L 4 fir. 3•i, g �c�, :. • z�k:�:�5 ry r�k � 33 � ��'. � ,,�xiqq{ �� N ; ��{'r.:� r� • r.. i; .�„t�,g f��`��,�� •3< .� r #_� 2�`',� },.��F � �?�u � � �+;r�z��`;-s: �� h< f � .��i r t:; ° ,d�« � �' � � -€. r ''`itA� •_ u £ ''fr�s,1 � ��.a v,, � � °`x "%-rz �.�a se n. -_a .tai �.� r.x ar, «a:� .�.. 3i�4.- .__�,.�!P��A�i�`��w+c_ t ar,, .x�_.•�,.n�� ..��.>E.` .fix t.� ,s_x..�a;rR„r�'Ix.. �d., .>�.E�4rt,. x- -at 3 ( �• r* pr5i'�, yIl } � r 2 'd - F }R,�{" L �� _;�. q£ 4 � � €' � x - k� Lill BsF F f Ex5»y #i �y 7F.' ` xiQ".3�Y3: '�Sq a.triaexa- ".r � rg:.'Sd ...t.. _� !�r?�... _ � � .4 �'�k x�_??��""}$��s.. �� s'„�'�� _-�p3 s rS�� 7�.'�$I�e�£ �t't�•FE,�s��Y;$. i i` x a��'. �`�'��"$ ��e X�' ' � �Z�iai,::. �# '>n s- �° az ,r; � 'k : 35 -•.;#S �y` �:� t i3' � 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM Time of Day —0 -25 mph -- 25 -30 mph 30 -35 mph 35 -40 mph - - >40 mph 160 140 120 d 100 t a� 0 80 L .a C r • IC 40 20 C Pierce Rd Between Bella Vina & Houston 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM 10 AM 11 AM 12 PM 1 PM 2 PM 3 PM 4 PM 5 PM 6 PM 7 PM Time of Day Kristin Borel Traffic Matrix #112 From: Joy Tsai Uoy.tsai @asr.sccgov.orgj ent: Friday, August 19, 2005 5:42 PM to: Kristin Borel Subject: Follow up Letter for 19225 Allendale Avenue - Cheng and Joy Tsai Attachments: 389- 31.pdf 389- 31.pdf(289 KB) Hi Kristin, It was a great news that our issue is now on. September 8th Traffic Safety Committee Annual Meeting agenda. I will be speaking at this meeting. I thought following information could be helpful for the Committee: Our difficulty in coming out of our driveway nowadays is two folds: With the circular driveway and additional paved parking spot by their mailbox area, our view is blocked by the parked cars, as well as by the overgrown bushes. I contacted the City back in early '94 when the current owner Mr. .tul Bhatnagar redid his front yard and the bushes started to block our view. After unsuccessful attempts with Mr. B, we called the City for assistance. A City person., by the name of Greg, came out and suggested to obtain a "court order ". We then informed Mr. B about the City's suggestion. But we never pursue into this option. When Mr. B added his circular driveway in 2000, and added a paved parking spot by his mail box, this matter has now forced us to pursue the same issue. Attached please find an Assessor's parcel map of this area (Their parcel is 389 -31 -010, ours -011). I will bring in an aerial view photo. on September Sth. r Thanks for your help. > «389- 31.pdb> 1 -------- - -------- . ..... . ......... . ... QFYI�- uf:-.. E;L)UNIY--ASSESSUH'--=---5ANTl�-- --CCARX-----CCLJNTY-,'--- CALIFORNIA . .......... ..... . ....... ... ..... ...... . ........ BOON PA aG E 19 6S iy 0 /F 19 94.96 11 11 2 19 TRACT Na 3997 21 —O so, I 131 µms' 98 .00- 15 103 20 47.31 7250 .112.61 FZ 4 40, 0 37 al 001, 20 2 Cm m 166.14 .96 C61 m m 9 ol 33 15 I p !?7. 1,!, �o 0 - - 22 — T , 16 42 1" loo, rR 1935 Z' 160.36 140 * 21 21 0 14CT 140 0 z "49k 2L6 I{ V 17 160 W oc - w L! 'j 7 23 -A 0 7 — U.J 22 28 31,10 - '.: 8F, IB nom/ Ss Z2 140.24 r,97' h p 6. 13 it \ I I I 0 . 34 16 — 2L5 23 24 / / ' \ y I c1 - 163.04 Z9 2LO —113 F50.O04 24 144.>d A B Go 6 f. 9 0 7.29 1 4 -17 --- so --- 25 111-31 A 4 5 -Z I � 3 -B'AA+n 4�5&,r' 8 30 132,fi t* L p 39.84 103*1 133.061 Proee(4 'Ml G? -9 b 0 69 64-19 S4 ui P.M. 228 -M -35 ml 3 X N�'. 114.S9 '9171 1%j 3- < Is; k .30 '26.5'2 112.51 RACT:• Na. 44.06 LAWRENCE E. STONE - ASSESSOR S Cadoitrd map for o3sessment Ii*sn p�ly Umpled under R. & T. Code. See.: 327. ALLO Effictl- R.11 Year 2005 --2006 Page 1 of 1 Kristin Borel From: Julie Daniel [Julie @matrixcable.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 10:45 AM To: Kristin Borel Subject: Fw: Pierce Road Traffic - - - -- Original Message - - - -- Kristin, Thank you for adding me to the agenda for the next Public Safety Commission meeting. As a long time resident of Pierce Road I have grown very concerned with the speed of ,traffic. I live at 12881 Pierce Road, which is located on the lower section of the street near Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road. I am concerned that the cars and trucks driving at excessive speeds puts our residents, their children, pets and guests at undue risk. The posted speed limit is 30 miles an hour, however this speed can be easily reached in a very short distance and many drivers continue to accelerate beyond that. Taking into consideration that when walking up the street with a child or dog or riding a bike, a car traveling at 35 miles per hour feels fast and unsafe let alone,a car or truck traveling at 40 T miles per hour. I started this endevor two years ago only to discover that many of my neighbors had been to the Public Safety Commission in the past. The Commission did make some change to the road at the bend, which is very dangerous when cars and trucks are speeding. I would like to further address the speed issues that would impact the straight away as well as the at the bend, the.two go hand in hand. Please help me make this a safe stretch of Pierce Road, to live on. Sincerely, Julie Daniel 8/24/2005 Kristin Borel From: Tipu Purkayastha [tipu_lives @yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 12:21 PM To: John Cherbone Cc: Kristin Borel; Kiran Malhotra Subject: RE: Require Stop Sign on crossing Surrey Ln & Saraview Dr Page 1 of 2 Traffic Matrix #113 Dear John, thank you for your prompt response. I look forward to hearing more from you on this matter, and I would love to contribute to the meeting in person should there be a need. Sincerely, Kiran Malhotra John Cherbone <jcherbone@saratoga.ca.us> wrote: Dear Ms. Malhotra, We will have the City Traffic Engineer take a look at the intersection. We will also schedule the issue for the September 8th Traffic Safety Commission Meeting. We will contact you as the meeting date gets closer. I Sincerely, John Cherbone From: Tipu Purkayastha [mailto:tipu_lives @yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 2:57 PM To: John Cherbone Cc: Kiran Malhotra Subject: Require Stop Sign on crossing Surrey Ln & Saraview Dr Dear Mr. Cherbone, My name is Kiran Malhotra, and I live at 13750 Surrey Lane in Saratoga The cross - street right near my house is Surrey Lane and Saraview Drive. Over the last few years, as traffic increased, I have seen many near accidents at the intersection as cars try to make a left from Saraview onto Surrey. The undulating topography in the area doesn't make for a. clear line of sight. I think a accident is just waiting to happen there. I, and other neighbors, w ill be very grateful if the city can install a Stop sign at this intersection. I look forward to a positive response from you. 8/24/2005 Page 2 of 2 Sincerely, Kiran Malhotra (408) 741 -3414 Start.y_our. day _with Yahoo! - make _it...yoiu- home page Yahoo! Mail Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour 8/24/2005 Kristin Borel From: John Cherbone Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 6:43 PM To: Dave Anderson; Eabracher @aol.com Cc: Kristin Borel Subject: RE: new signs Page 1 of 1 Traffic Matrix #115 Hi Eric, I believe the new signs were part of a Neighborhood Traffic Management Project. We will let you know if we can accommodate your request once our Traffic Engineer gets a chance to take a look. Sincerely, John From: Dave Anderson Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 3:04 PM 'To: John Cherbone Subject: FW: new signs _......._ ................. _._.__- ...... _.__.._ From: Eabracher @aol.com [mailto:Eabracher @ aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 11:12 AM To: Dave Anderson Subject: new signs I like your new signs on the streets Bucknal and Paseo Paseda. Any chance of another on beterrn the entrance to Quito shopping center and Saratoga Ave on Cox? many don't realize its 25 MPH when coming off Cox west. makes it hard to exit Genes Fine Foods. enc 8/24/2005 Page 1 of 4 Kristin Bores Traffic Matrix #104 From: John Cherbone Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 9:41 AM To: Susan Zucca Cc: Rick Torres; Kristin Borel Subject: RE: Concerns about access to Marshall Lane Hi Susan, We are waiting to get a. report from our Traffic Engineer on the striping details. We are going to try to get the safety work completed before schools starts again. Do you have the date when Marshall School starts up again? Thanks, John From: Susan Zucca [mailto:szucca @mailblocks.com] Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 9:41 AM To: John Cherbone Subject: RE: Concerns about access to Marshall Lane Hi John, Just checking in. I noticed the houses on the corner of Ravenwood and on Quito trimmed their bushes. Yeah! Can you let me know the status of getting the lines repainted to allow more space for pedestrians at the turns at Ravenwood & Marshall Lane? Thanks, Susan Zucca - - - -- Original Message---- - From: John Cherbone <jherbone @saratoga.ca.us> To: Susan Zucca <szucca @mailblocks.com> Sent: Wed, 1.5 Jun 2005 21:34:18 -0700 Subject: RE: Concerns about access to Marshall Lane Hi Susan, I am planning on meeting with you tomorrow, Thursday, 1 will give you a call in the morning or if you would like to call me I can be reached on my cell phone at 393 -1523. Thanks, John - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Susan Zucca [mailto:szucca @mailblocks.com] 8/24/2005 Page 2 of 4 Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 6:55 AM To: John Cherbone Subject: RE: Concerns about access to Marshall Lane OK John. If you'd like to join us for a walk to school that would give you a chance to see and hear about it. Any morning is good if you wanted to meet at the house at 7:50am or so that would be fine. 13911 Loquat Court. After school next week is tough. We have something going almost everyday. Let me know, Susan - - - -- Original Message---- - From: John Cherbone <jcherbone @saratoga.ca.us> m To: Susan Zucca <szucca @mailblocks.co> Cc: Kristin Bore] <kborel @saratoga.ca.us> Sent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:29:37 -0700 Subject: RE: Concerns about access to Marshall Lane Hi Susan, I would be happy to meet with you to see the issues first-hand. Perhaps we can meet next week sometime. Lets touch base early next week to see if we can schedule something. Sincerely, John - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Susan Zucca [mailto:szucca @mailblocks.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 12:34 PM To: John Cherbone Cc: gzuccaus @yahoo.com Subject: RE: Concerns about access to Marshall Lane Hi John, Thank you for getting back to me. I appreciate your assistance in all matters. The problem with us using the nice new pathways on Sobey and Marshall Lane, is that they still require the kids to cross a dangerous intersection at Marshall Lane. Drivers going northbound on Quito often drive fast and zoom around the corner and could easily hit a child trying to cross there. I'm not comfortable taking my kids that route. I'd much rather go down Ravenwood, turning left onto Marilyn Lane. But without sidewalks and with the parked cars blocking the street it's dangerous as well. I don't want to be annoying, but if the new lot "added" parking then why are there lots of cars parking on Marilyn Lane..in front of residences & right up on their yards? Cars also used to park Marshall Lane Street but now they can't because of the sidewalk. One family who lives on the corner pf Marshall Lane and Marilyn Lane added about 50 yards of sharp rocks to deter people from parking there. 8/24/2005 Page 3 of 4 I' suppose you can only really know the situation if you were to go there in the morning at 8:15am. The situation truly discourages people from Ravenwood & our neighborhood from walking or riding our bikes. I'd be happy to escort you sometime to show- you what I mean. Thank you again for looking into the pathways on Quito and for alerting the Traffic Commission to the need for a "children crossing" type of sign. I look forward to hearing from you. And my offer remains open to show you what I mean. Have a nice weekend, Susan - - - -- Original Message---- - From: John Cherbone <jherbone @saratoga.ca.us> , To: Susan Zucca <szucca @mailblocks.com> Cc: Kristin Borel <kborel @saratoga.ca.us> Sent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:24:11 -0700 Subject: RE: Concerns about access to Marshall Lane Dear Ms. Zucca, I I will have the pathways looked at along Quito to see what we can do. The new Traffic Safety Commission will be looking into types of signage which alert motorists to pedestrians and if appropriate we will install one in your area. The drop off area on Sobey was eliminated because of the same safety issues mentioned in your email. The new parking lot off of Sobey actually increased the parking at the school. Last week we completed pathways on both Sobey and Marshall to increase safety for pedestrians. We believe the pathways will really make a difference for children walking to school. If necessary we will. agendize your concerns for the next Traffic Safety Commission Meeting. I will let you know what we can do regarding the sidewalk maintenance issues. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions (868 - 1241). I look forward to working on these issues with you. Sincerely, John Cherbone Public works Director - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: Susan Zucca [mailto:szucca @mailblocks.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 9:14 AM To: John Cherbone Subject: Concerns about access to Marshall Lane 8/24/2005 Page 4 of 4 Hi, My name is Susan Zucca and we live at 13911 Loquat Court in Saratoga (corner of Allendale, near Quito). We have been walking our kids to Marshall Lane school for 5 years now-but I finally stopped this,year because of the safety issues. Ever since they re -built the parking lot and put up the parking barriers on Sobey Road there hasn't been enough parking for the parents at the school. Many parents park and walk their kids to class-mingle with other parents, attend morning PTA meetings, , etc. What's happened is that they are now parking on Marilyn Lane. So when we try to walk-there is no sidewalk and we end up dodging car doors opening and trying to avoid getting hit by cars driving by. Twice I had to grab my daughter and pull her aside to get her away from an oncoming car. There was nowhere for her to go. Also, the sidewalk from Allendale to Ravenwood is atrocious. The pine tree roots have pushed up the asphalt make it impossible to walk without looking down and navigating your steps. It's dangerous for bicyclists as well. Finally, is there a way I can request a "Slow, Children crossing" or "Slow, Children at play" sign for Allendale? My kids play ball and sometimes need to cross Allendale to get it. It is frightening as the speed limit is 25 but many cars ignore it and race by. Especially college students (maybe late for class) who seem oblivious of the speed limit. My kids also have friends on Allendale and I am very afraid they will get hit trying to cross the street to go play with them. Please let me know if there are plans to remedy these situations. I can be reached by phone most afternoons at 408 - 374 -3143. I am happy to clarify this note and answer any questions. Thank you, Susan and Glenn Zucca 8/24/2005 Page 1 of 7 Traffic Matrix #99 John Cherbone From: Ian [ianwebb5 @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 5:49 PM To: John Cherbone Subject: RE: Red Curbs on Herriman opposite the high school Mr. Cherbone, I have already replied to Mr. Torres message with copies to Mayor Waltonsmith and City Manager Andersoh. Your message arrived while I was composing that reply if I use the time stamp on it. .I did not receive it from my mail account until after I had sent out the reply. It seemed clear cut tome that the reply I received from the City Clerk on 31 August indicates that there has been no recorded official approval for other than red curbs at one residence on Herriman and that the painting next door and across the street have been done without recorded approval. I'm sorry to move out of the "chain of command" but I fear that the financial difficulties we've increasingly encountered over the past 6 or 8 years have made this the type of issue that has nowhere,to go. Had I received your reply before replying to Mr. Torres and to the Mayor and City Manager, I would certainly have waited to see what help you can be. I certainly don't expect instant action or response that the City was able to give 10 or 15 years ago but in this case think I have been stuck in what turns out to be an endless loop and thus decided to break out of it by contacting the Mayor and the City Manager. My apologies if this creates a problem for you for I understand it is not your doing but a sign of the times with the very sparse staffing that we must live with in the city. I will send you a copy of what I just sent out so you will be fully aware. I thank you for the reply. Ian From: John Cherbone [mailto:jcherbone @saratoga.ca.us] Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 5:20 PM To: Ian Cc: Rick Torres Subject: RE: Red Curbs on Herriman opposite the high school Dear Mr. Webb, will have someone perform the research and determine the issues surrounding the red curb issue. Rick Torres does not have the means to determine this. I appreciate your patients regarding this matter and apologize on behalf of the City for not getting you this information in a timely matter. I will do my best to have a record search completed within two weeks. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me, at 868 -1241. Sincerely, John Cherbone Public Works Director 5/27/2005 Page 2 of 7 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Rick Torres Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 4:55 PM To: 'Ian' Cc: John Cherbone; Cathleen Boyer Subject: RE: Red Curbs on Herriman opposite the high school Dear Mr. Webb, I was under the impression that Code Enforcement was handling this issue and I was not aware I was to respond to you. I did do some research on this and I did find some maintenance records on the intersection in question. The red curbs were installed in August of 1992 in this location and I believe if I have a maintenance record for those red curbs I have no reason to believe that they are illegal . I only receive request to install or remove this type of traffic control. Code Enforcement has had some problems with the resident at the corner of Herriman and Saratoga Vista painting his curb around his driveway in the past, Which I saw on my site visit that he reinstalled. Unfortunately, Our Public . Safety Officer has accepted a new job at another city and I do not have the authority to pursue this. As you know the city is going through some financial difficulties and we have been experiencing some short fall in man power to complete small project like this one. Please accept my apologies for this inconvenience, but this is the best I can do for you. If I could be any further assistance to you in the future please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks. Sincerely, Rick Torres Street Maintenance Supervisor City of Saratoga 408 - 868 -1244 or rtorres cDsaratoga.ca.us - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Ian [mailto:ianwebbS @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 3:06 PM To: Rick Torres Subject: Red Curbs on Herriman opposite the high school Mr. Torres, Can you give me an update on this item from 4 weeks ago please? In case you didn't read the previous correspondence about this I call your attention to the note from the City Clerk that said: "The only red curb approved by the City Council in that area is MV -238 approved on 08/07/02. This resolution approved the red curb in front of 20221 Herriman Drive." Ian Webb From: Steve Prosser [ mailto:sprosser @saratoga.ca.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 8:31 AM To: Ian Subject: RE: Red Curbs on Herriman opposite the high school Mr. Webb, 5/27/2005 Page 3 of 7 The complaint has been forwarded to Public' Woks. They will determine which of the red curbs were allowed by City Council. After finding out which ones are in violation, they will paint the curbs the proper color. You should see a change within two months. Please call Rick Torres (408) 868 -1244; if you have any questions. Steve Prosser Public Safety Officer - - - -- Original Message--- - From: Ian [mailto:ianwebb5 @comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 1:31 PM, To: Steve Prosser Subject: RE: Red Curbs on Herriman opposite the high school Steve, It's been two weeks since I inquired as to the status of the red curbs painted on Herrima6 avenue. You will recall we first communicated 6 weeks ago about'that. I'd appreciate some indicate about the status of that item even if it's an indication that you haven't yet been able to get time to pursue it. Thank you. Ian Webb From: Ian [mailto:ianwebb5 @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 3:22 PM To: 'sprosser @saratoga.ca.us' Subject: RE: Red Curbs on Herriman opposite the high school Mr. Prosser, Since it's been four weeks, I thought I'd check back with you and see if you have been able to check this out and what you might have found? Thank you, Ian Webb From: Ian [mailto:ianwebb5 @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 4:47 PM To: 'sprosser @saratoga.ca.us' Subject: FW: Red Curbs on Herriman opposite the high school Steve, 5/27/2005 Page 4 of 7 Per our conversation a few minutes ago. Thank you for anything you can do about this. Ian Ian Webb 20621 Canyon View Dr. Saratoga, CA From: Cathleen Boyer [mailto:ctclerk @saratoga.ca.us] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 11:17 AM To: ianwebb5 @comcast.net Subject: RE: Red Curbs on Herriman opposite the high school :nl9 The only red curb approved by the City Council in that area is MV -238 approved on 08/07/02. This resolution approved the red curb in front of 20221 Herriman Drive. If you want a copy of the resolution I can mail it or fax it to you. You should call Code Enforcement and report the other . curbs. Steve Prosser is the City's Code Enforcement Officer he can be reached at 868 -1214. Cathleen - - - -- Original Message---- - From: ianwebb5 @comcast.net [ma ilto: is nwebb5 @comcast. net] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 10 :44 AM To: Cathleen Boyer Subject: RE: Red Curbs on Herriman opposite the high school Cathleen, It's vacation time of year! I certainly understand. Thanks for the reply and any information you might give me about this. Ian -------- - - - - -- Original message ---==- - - - - -- Hi - I apologize for the late email - I've been on 5/27/2005 Page 5 of 7 vacation - I will check our archives to see if the City passed a resolution to paint the curbs. III let you know Cathleen - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Ian [mailto: ianwebb5 @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 12:30 AM To: Cathleen Boyer Subject: Red Curbs on Herriman opposite the high school Ms Boyer, I received a reply to an e -mail below from Rick Torres who suggested that I could find out from your office about the area of Herriman near Camino Rico and the red curbs that appear to me to be newly created in that area. I'd be interested in knowing if the curbs, that appear to be somewhat poorly painted are really ones that the City created or if homeowners have decided themselves to create their own red areas to keep from having parking in front of the homes. I don't recall them being there a few months ago and if these were not created through proper channels I'm concerned, about this trend spreading. Perhaps you can tell me how I can find the answer to that and the questions posed in the message to Mr.. Torres. Thank you for your assistance. Ian Webb Canyon View Dr. Saratoga 867 -9533 I have noticed red 5/27/2005 Page 6 of 7 • curbs have been painted along the northerly side of Herriman,in the area of Camino Rico. To be honest the paint job looks home done and the location of much of the red area seems to make no sense except people don't want cars parking in front of their houses. 1 have noticed that cars park there ANYWAY even with the red and I've yet to see any indication of enforcement or ticketing by law enforcement. It always annoys me when people who don't pay attention to the law take advantage of the lack of enforcement and do what they please while those who try to obey the law aren't able to take advantage of parking which might be more convenient for them. My questions are: • Is this authorized painting? • If it's authorized, what is the process that one uses to get curbs painted red? • Why is that area red when there are other areas along Hernman that seem to me anyway to be the same and they aren't red. • If this is authorized, why isn't the red zone being enforced? I thank you for a response to my questions. Ian Webb 5/27/2005 Traffic Matrix x#110 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION TRAFFIC COMPLAINT DATE: S�n��g Gun° NAME: 1 L I ADDRESS: PHONE: . 2. EMAIL: DATE SENT TO F &P: DISCUSSION SCHEDULED FOR PSC MEETING: DATE ADDED TO TRAFFIC MATRIX:. DESCRIPTION OF TRAFFIC ISSUE: nG wcn� d�1� ��►� h�c�tl DIAGRAM IF NEEDED: Traffic Matrix #114 Kristin' Borel From: John Cherbone Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 7:14 PM To: Lorie Tinfow Cc:_ Kristin Borel; Rick Torres Subject: RE: Blue Hills Hi Lorie, I will have to defer the schedule to Rick. John From: Lorie Tinfow Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 6:29 PM To: John Cherbone Cc: Kristin Borel; Rick Torres Subject: RE: Blue Hills thank you; any idea of timing? - - - -- Original Message---- - From: John Cherbone Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 6:08 PM To: Lorie Tinfow Cc: Kristin Borel; Rick Torres Subject: RE: Blue Hills Hi Lorie, I do not see why we cannot take care of these two issues. John From: Lorie Tinfow Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 5:27 PM To: John Cherbone Subject: Blue Hills I had a request from Marcia Kearns to make two changes to the traffic control elements at Blue Hills: 1. move the "no left turn" sign currently posted on the right as cars exit the parking lot from its current location to the dirt area between the sidewalk and the street. With its current placement, some drivers pull up past it and don't see it (or are ignoring it....). 2. could we install a break away sign in the middle of the crosswalk on Knollwood like we've done elsewhere? Since the crossing guard has been eliminated, she is asking for help in alerting drivers. Thanks. Lorie 1 Kristin Borel From: Sue Brooks [sbrooks @saratogausd.org] Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 4:57 PM To: Kristin Borel Subject: Re: Aloha Intersection Thanks, Sue - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: _Kristin Borel To: Sue Brooks Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 5:14 PM Subject: RE: Aloha Intersection Page 1 of 2 Traffic Matrix #116 Sue, The Director and Street Supervisor are going to look at these -on Tuesday on their regular site visits, and I will let you know what they want to do. Kristin From: Sue Brooks [mailto:sbrooks @saratogausd.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 8:21 AM To: Kristin Borel Subject: Re: Aloha Intersection We have two crosswalks used a lot by parents and students. One is at Miljevich crossing Shadow Mt. The other is at Ljepava crossing Shadow Mt. Thanks, Sue - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: Kristin Borel To: Sue Brooks Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 8:24 PM Subject: RE: Aloha Intersection Sue, Could you tell me where you would like the sign exactly. Do you have cross streets, an intersection, crosswalk, or address? When I know where you want it, I can follow up with the Director. Let me know. Kristin From: Sue Brooks [mailto:sbrooks @ saratogausd.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 1:39 PM To: Kristin Borel Subject: Re: Aloha Intersection I called yesterday about the possibility of getting a Yield to Pedestrians sign (like at the intersection of Oak St. and Hywy. 9) for school crosswalks. I realize they are probably a maintenance issue, but I think they are very visible to drivers and make them think twice before rushing through the crosswalk. 8/24/2005