Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-14-01 packet10 City of Saratoga HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA Date: Tuesday, August 14, 9:00 a.m. Place: Planning Conference Room, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Type: Regular Meeting I. Routine Organization A. Roll Call B. Approval of minutes from 7/10/01 C. Posting of the Agenda - Pursuant to Government Code Section 94954.2, the agenda was posted on Thursday August 9, 2001 D. Oral Communications E. Written Communications II. Old Business A. Design Signage for the Orchard adopt a tree kiosk - Decide who will handle this project and tentative completion date B. Discussion of Mission Statement Ideas. — Review the Mission Statement ideas C. Review of Village Design Guidelines — Review the Guidelines and develop ideas for enhancement D. Heritage Tours — Continue discussion III. New Business A. Review of the Orchard Master Plan IV. Items Initiated by the Commission A. No new items V. Items Initiated by the Secretary A. Discuss impacts of CEQA on Heritage Resources B. HPC funds C. Update on Hayfield House VI. Adjournment 9:00 a.m. Tuesday September 11, 2001 — Planning Conference room City of Saratoga HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES Date: Wednesday, August 1, 9:00 a.m. Place: Odd Fellows Home, 14500 Fruitvale Avenue Type: Special Meeting — Meet on the steps in front of the main plaza historical building at the Odd Fellows Home. I. Routine Organization Roll Call: Present: King, Koepernik, Peck, Grens, Wyman, Absent: Peepari, Planning Commission Liaison: Hunter II. New Business A. Tour of Odd Fellows Home to review historically significant features. B. Introduction of proposed development at the Odd Fellows Home. The Commission reviewed the proposed addition and accessibility improvements. The Commission made the following recommendations to the applicant: Maintain the original lights in the auditorium and the granite baseboard. Keep the existing ceiling details and floor in the main entry if possible. If the existing trees at the main entrance need to be replaced, replace them with a substantial tree that will grow to a similar height and size. III. Adjournment 9:00 a.m. Tuesday August 14, 2001 — Planning Conference room City of Saratoga HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES Date: Tuesday, August 14, 9:00 a.m. Place: Planning Conference Room, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Type: Regular Meeting I. Routine Organization A. Roll Call, Present: Koepernik, Grens, Peepari, Wyman Absent: King, Peck Guests: Dave Anderson, John Cherbone, Linda Gates, Danielle Surdin, and Seval Oz. B. Approval of minutes from 7/ 10 /01, APPROVED 4 -0 C. Posting of the Agenda - Pursuant to Government Code Section 94954.2, the agenda was posted on Thursday August 9, 2001 D. Oral Communications - Seval Oz, 14610 Quito Road, Saratoga CA, raised concerns about an accessory structure on her neighbors property at 14670 Quito Road. She thought the structure might be historic and over 50 years old. Commissioners Grens and Wymen volunteered to review the structure. Oral Communications continued - Danielle Surdin gave a report on the walking historic tour brochure. The tour will include 30 to 40 homes. She also gave an update on the Village Lighting program. E. Written Communications -None H. Old Business A. Design Signage for the Orchard adopt a tree kiosk - Decide who will handle this project and tentative completion date. B. Discussion of Mission Statement Ideas. —The Mission Statement was discussed and a vote was taken to remove the Mission Statement based on the concept that the present Ordinance gives direction on the HPC mission. Peepari made a motion to remove the Mission Statement, Kopernik seconded it, the vote was 3- 1 with Grens objecting. C. Review of Village Design Guidelines — Review the Guidelines and develop ideas for enhancement. The guidelines where reviewed and it was decided that the existing guidelines are adequate, but will need further development for the future. The Commission Chair recommended the item be removed from the next agenda. D. Heritage Tours — Continued discussion. III. New Business A. Review of the Orchard Master Plan -Linda Gates handed out a draft of the Heritage Orchard Master Plan. She discussed the following issues: replacement of dead trees, retain non - orchard trees, no formal paths, permanent irrigation system, installation of a well with a booster pump, construction of a barn for equipment storage, budget of 200K, replacement of trees that are I/4 and '/2 dead, and maintaining Cherry trees and replacing dead Cherry trees with new Cherry trees. Commissioner Peepari asked that the CIP budget include the cost for an orchard sign. IV. Items Initiated by the Commission A. No new items V. Items Initiated by the Secretary A. Discuss impacts of CEQA on Heritage Resources B. HPC funds C. Update on Hayfield House -The owners Architect provided a letter updating the Commission on the progress of the remodel. VI. Adjournment 9:00 a.m. Tuesday September 11, 2001 — Planning Conference room City of Saratoga HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA Date: Wednesday, August 1, 9:00 a.m. Place: Odd Fellows Home, 14500 Fruitvale Avenue Type: Special Meeting — Meet on the steps in front of the main plaza historical building at the Odd Fellows Home. I. Routine Organization Roll Call II. New Business A. Tour of Odd Fellows Home to review historically significant features. B. Introduction of proposed development at the Odd Fellows Home. III. Adjournment 9:00 a.m. Tuesday August 14, 2001 — Planning Conference room August 6, 200 1. Heritage Preservation Commission City of Saratoga, Planning Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 Re: HAYFIELD HOUSE, 18888 Hayfield Ct. Dear Members of the Commission: In regards to the reconstruction of the Hayfield House, I want to update you on our progress, as well as invite you to review the installations to date. As with most construction projects of this magnitude and detail, we are a bit off of the projected schedule. The following list summarizes the percentage of completeness of the major items: Roof Shingles- approximately 95% complete 2. Copper gutters- 100% 3. Windows- 75% installed, 90% delivered 4. Doors- 50% installed, 75% delivered 5. Dormers- Roof, trim, and windows installed; shingle side walls- I out of 14 6. Balcony planter boxes- 100% have been installed, awaiting rosettes 7. Exterior Trim- 10% installed, 90% sandblasted 8. Front Porch Addition- 100% rough framing 9. Stucco- pending 10. GUEST HOUSE: a. Rough frame- 30% 11. GARAGE: a. Rough frame- 100% Currently, the exterior trim is being installed, as are the remaining doors and windows. A large portion of the work being performed is on the interior (electrical, etc.), but the building paper and wire mesh for the stucco should be applied in the next two months or so. The stucco coatings are scheduled for sometime in December and January. You are welcome to review the work on the project at any time- just contact the contractor, Karl Barnes, at (408) 867 -6540, to arrange a tour. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, Gary Kohlsaat Is Architect Attachments: Progress photos P.O. BOX 1500 • LOS GATOS, CA • 95031 • (408) 395 -2555 Hayfielci 5/01 Hayfield 0/01 2 EXT- RIGHT REAR.JPC� DESCRIPTION: Advanced Planning DEPARTMENT: Community Development FUNCTION: Development Services SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES Personnel Supplies & Services Capital Equipment Indirect Cost Allocation TOTAL EXPENDITURES UMBER: V 1999 -00 Actual 2000 -01 1 2001 -02 1 2002 -03 Proposed Bud et % Change from 00 -01 Revised Revised Estimated I Budget Actual Approved Proposed Budget Bud et 44,909 56,171 20,135 50,576 75,104 80,373 273% 56,738 107,610 62,950 51,800 21,750 12,050 -65% 0 0 0 0 0 0 n/a 28,200 27,710 25,476 28,374 29,735 30,012 17% L__129,847 191,491 108,561 130,750 126,589 122,435 17% EXPENDITURE DETAIL 2 / 8421 Personnel 1001 Wages, Regular 2001 Benefits Personnel Total Supplies & Services 3001 Supplies 4005 Mileage /Auto Allowance 4010 Contract Services 4041 Printing /Binding Supplies & Services Total Capital Equipment 6000 Capital Equipment Capital Equipment Total DIRECT COST SUBTOTAL 6001 Indirect Cost Allocation TOTAL EXPENDITURES 37,537 7,372 47,557 16,451 8,614 3,684 41,464 61,599 9,112 13,505 65,779 14,594 274% 267% 44,909 56,171 20,135 50,576 75,104 80,373 273% 0 800 800 800 1,600 1,600 100% 0 0 150 0 150 150 0% 55,246 96,810 60,000 50,000 10,000 10,300 -83% 1,492 10,000 2,000 1,000 10,000 0 400% 56,738 107,610 62,950 51,800 21,750 12,050 -65% 0 0 0 0 0 0 n/a 0 0 0 0 0 0 n/a 101,647. 28,200 163,781 83,085 27,710 25,476 102,376 96,854 28,374 29,735 92,423 30,012 17% 17% 129,847 191,491 108,561 130,750 126,589 122,435 17% 102 DESCRIPTION: City Commissions DEPARTMENT: City Manager rTj1NCTION: General Government PERFORMANCE GOALS: 1. To provide an appropriate level of support services (recruitment, staffing and training) to the City's seven advisory commissions. 2. To provide adequate training to Support Commissioners in performing their responsibilities. STAFFING: Administrative Services Director City Clerk Administrative Analyst Associate Planner Recreation Supervisor 0.10 0.25 0.55 0.20 0.10 NUMBER: 1015 FY 00/01 EXPENDITURE NOTES: 4004 - Registration fees and travel costs for various commissioners to attend statewide conferences and annual staff / Commissions working retreats. CITY COMMISSIONS BREAKDOWN Parks and Recreation 1,500 Heritage Resources 600 Youth 1,000 Safety 1,000 Library 600 Finance 600 Planning 1,500 FUNDING SOURCE(S): 001 - GENERAL FUND Undesignated The full cost of this program is allocated to other programs through the Indirect Cost Allocation formula. FY 01/02 EXPENDITURE Supplies & BREAKDOWN Capital EXPENDITURE TREND Equipment $120,000 �Services +s"+i� r " $, ti 1 0 7 2✓a s x 8 / n 0 / $100,000 `c tf riw •r hx r t� r u" �w„ 4F'l ��.N•�itiN•� �`' J:yt ^% iti 2 ..:t �,cq� kti{ :u° l+�c :.a +/ri 14 .'. $80.000 yT $60,000 mr +2sr 4 $40,000 gg $20,000 � Personnel 92% $0 98 -99 99 -00 00-01 01 -02 02 -03 45 a The Santa Clara County Planning Office is pleased to inform you that Historical Heritage Commission monthly meeting agendas are now available. online. www.scct)lanning.org (click on "Meeting Agendas" on the top heading bar) Heritage Orchard Master Plan Saratoga, California David Gates & Associates August, 2001 Acknowleftements City Council Mayor Jim Shaw Vice Mayor Stan Bosogian Councilman John Mehaffey Councilman Nick Streit Councilman Evan Baker Heritage Preservation Commission Norman Koepernik, Chair Nancy Anderson Larry Fine Carolyn King Willys Peck Robert Peepari Beth Wyman City Staff City Manager: David Anderson Public Works Director: John Cherbone Saratoga Heritage Orchard Master Plan Purpose of Document In order to ensure the long -term viability of Saratoga's Heritage Orchard, the Heritage Commission has prepared an Orchard Master Plan. This document provides for the renovation of the existing orchard and sets out guidelines to control future uses in the interest of minimizing disruption of the existing character or health of the orchard. Context The Heritage Orchard is an approximately 18 -acre site at the corner of Saratoga Avenue and Fruitvale Avenue. The orchard is currently comprised of Prune, Apricot, and Cherry trees. Historically, the orchard was made up primarily of Apricot trees, which still comprise approximately half of the trees in the orchard. Overtime, a number of trees in the orchard have died or declined. A substantial number of trees need to be replanted to maintain the orchard in a healthy condition. Currently, the orchard is irrigated using a temporary system. Irrigation lines are manually laid out on top of the ground to provide flood irrigation to four rows of orchard trees and then relocated to the next four rows of orchard trees. Using this labor intensive approach, the trees are watered four to six times per year from a metered source. The Saratoga Library is located in the North corner of the orchard facing Saratoga Avenue. The proposed library expansion will necessitate the removal of some orchard trees to accommodate the building and parking expansion. Sixty -two of the removed trees have been transplanted to other locations in the orchard. An additional 140 orchard trees will be planted as a part of the separate library expansion project. These trees will be primarily located in the triangle of the Saratoga/Fruitvale intersection and along Saratoga Avenue with the remainder being planted the immediate perimeter of the library. View of existing orchard from Saratoga Avenue Entry driveway Dirt road to barn site Apricot trees at existing parking Goals The following goals have been identified for the Saratoga Heritage Orchard: 1. Preserve the orchard as a functioning agrarian use. 2. Provide educational opportunities to learn about agricultural history in the area and orchard management and operations. 3. Maximize views of the orchard from the surrounding area to insure the orchard is an important part of the community's image. 4. Minimize intrusion of site improvements into orchard that may disrupt orchard maintenance operations or impact the `natural appearance' of the orchard. 5. Ensure orchard is maintained in optimum health by implementing necessary orchard maintenance and replacement programs. 6. Implement a tree adoption program. Recommendations In developing the master plan the Heritage Preservation Committee reviewed a number of issues associated with the orchard from permitted uses to long -term maintenance approach. The following recommendations summarize their input on the range of issues. Replace orchard trees that have died or are in substantial decline. Currently, there are 298 dead or missing trees in need of replacement. A further 69 are in severe decline likely requiring attention in the near future and an additional 95 trees will potentially need to be replaced in the next 5 years. Replacement tree species should be consistent with the existing trees in the various sections of the orchard. Specific varieties or cultivars should be selected which are adapted to the environment. Heritage Orchard Stats Existing Tree Inventory Healthy Tree Canopy *Trees under 7 years old Retain existing health of non - orchard trees. A number of native oaks and other trees interspersed throughout the orchard, while their existing trees are not typically found in a commercial orchard as they compete with the fruit trees in sun and space. The Heritage Preservation Committee felt it is important to retain these trees as a part of the sites history. However, only orchard trees will be planted in the orchard in the future. Quarter Half Three Quarters Full Young Trees* Sub- Total Dead Trees Total Apricots 25 45 7 305 168 550 200 750 Cherries 0 0 0 0 314 1 314 61 375 Prunes 44 40 3 73 105 265 34 299 Total 1424 *Trees under 7 years old Retain existing health of non - orchard trees. A number of native oaks and other trees interspersed throughout the orchard, while their existing trees are not typically found in a commercial orchard as they compete with the fruit trees in sun and space. The Heritage Preservation Committee felt it is important to retain these trees as a part of the sites history. However, only orchard trees will be planted in the orchard in the future. Provide informal pedestrian paths in orchard. Pedestrian paths in the orchard shall have minimal impact on the natural appearance of the orchard and not interfere with maintenance. Pedestrian access through the orchard should be limited to hard packed, dirt paths created by dragging or rolling a disced area to create an even smoother surface. Paths will need to be recreated each year. Install a permanent irrigation ystem in the orchard. Irrigation for orchard trees will be designed according to adapted city standards to accommodate orchard conditions. Available gallons per minute and water pressure to be determined by the type of connection. (On site water well or city water main). The irrigation system will be designed to achieve maximum watering efficiency through head to head coverage. The system would be laid out to work with the discing pattern of the rows. A permanent system will minimize the labor associated with the current temporary irrigation system approach and to provide greater flexibility with watering in response to precipitation patterns and individual tree needs. Install a well with a booster pump for irrigation water supply. In order to reduce the city's reliance on and the expense of a metered water source, the city should initiate the process of implementing a well system. Preliminary information would seem to indicate a well system at this site would be successful. A test well needs to be drilled to confirm the feasibility of a well system for irrigation use. If the well system feasibility is confirmed, a booster pump or holding tank system should be designed to accommodate irrigation supply demand. Construct a "barn" to house orchard maintenance equipment and provide a focus for education programs. The maintenance barn should be located in the existing open area in the eastern portion of the site at the end of the existing access road. In addition to storage the barn could also be used as a gathering area for docent educational programs about the orchard. The barn would be approximately 40'x 80' and house all maintenance equipment and supplies stored on site. No outdoor storage would be allowed. The character of the barn should be consistent with the historic character of the orchard. (Public restrooms would not be provided in the barn area.) Design of the barn would be subject to review by the city. A gravel forecourt would provide all- weather access to the barn. The gravel area should be a minimized size for barn uses. Access to the barn should be via the existing access road and would only be used for orchard maintenance. Access to the barn for educational purposes would be via the pedestrian pathways. A water tower could also be located in this area to provide a visual landmark. JO NA'}t�}LM -1CC- �Fh e CDC Implement an adoption program for orchard trees. In order to increase community involvement in the orchard preservation and to off set some of the orchard maintenance costs. The commission would like the City to implement a tree adoption program. While the details of the program would need to be refined, the commission envisions a freestanding kiosk to be used to identify individual adopted trees rather than plaques scattered throughout the orchard. Pedestrian access through the orchard would be created by discing the rolling paths between the rows, parallel to the irrigation lines. Implementation The implementation of the Master Plan will occur over a number of years. In addition to the ongoing management strategies, there are a number of capital improvements, which are a part of the master plan. The phase I improvements should be undertaken in the next year to insure the continuing health of the orchard. Phase I Capital Improvements • Replace missing or dead orchard trees • Install a permanent irrigation system • Explore feasibility of a well and install well system as appropriate Future Phase Improvements • Adopt a tree program development • Maintenance `Barn" construction • Ongoing orchard tree replacement as required Typically orchard trees are planted from bare root stock or seeded in the fall and planted in January or February. All other improvements such as well and irrigation system would need to be installed prior to planting. The city council will need to allocate funds for Phase I improvements as follows. The following Phase I costs are anticipated: Item Unit Cost Cost Assorted Orchard Fruit Trees (298) $100 /tree $30,000 Irrigation System Lump sum $95,000 Booster Pump /Well Lump sum $41,000 Electrical Lump sum $5,000 Subtotal $171,000 Contingency 20% $34,200 Total $205,200 _Orchard Inventorq IDEAS OR X M165ING TREES f %d ' l �•�'�",,p+�`++j� sue;' 1 1 CIVIC CENTER TOTAL "AME -r• TIEE3 PRUNES �s�•�s�s OAK OR 214 WILD TREES Ibb IDEAS OR X M165ING TREES f %d ' l �•�'�",,p+�`++j� sue;' 1 1 CIVIC CENTER TOTAL "AME 860 TIEE3 APRfCOTB 420 CNERRIE3 214 PRUNER Ibb DEAD GF2 M155w -s 298 TREES C2 rr S. - y 2 �i• exxx ' r� t�:d600,0& of . Low G.:_ .i V 1864,000 i�/•FrY%/ j r' * t/+ .re � •• �' i � �• �� � t" „� r .;.: S� .fia%sr•.' {4frs.;a �: y'.�e Y� f}l�yy � :.:y � r I /.• ;y', � r,� P "� � '" ^��, fin' � �� � ''� �i� � � 'sk :�+ •• +(� � !� �' Y,f � ter' � � `� � g °' � i 1 � �� a�3.3`,w q ' � � > 5 .• :�3 ws %.a v. :� �. i ». n� �d raj , y � ..• � � _'` y s�;>'a. :<> �n a:'.+ a6 .'2` ��1� .$,p � }J�.� {-r0'�li'• � �}. Pot' �• `4Yf5 ,`i'{� : :: � ?::. ^' .e � � "°'' i:?F �'.'"' FAa ^P•Y }'�- -.nn -. '? `yP,% � �i`tir�� r`L •i �i '' O Rim � .�i'. i,�r fn1: ri \f• �• �.-..' r ••� °?� � Pg +\rr�n.��5 •d. � 5::. � `� {.� �'� 'i?z' u*�r act {Fr'? _ � tK,,xa •F is M'r � L ':te" �. O ,�• ,cT� ` `�k1 ...%. ,t}�.a . �jdA. �C�a.^ �•.., •,� lZ4g� 8vi'/ � !�, 1 ti2e � .. ��aP�$•,i`r' :`s W a:?� E {`.L ,T�s'� •$ti.�y ;fir /�. /.��• +:1t.z[re ' �• ,� ,xY �'�, st•' �x�.;'.. T�, :i ai• fpi";%I 1`''2! .'4' s3aa+• NEW ON TTTj - �''•' < • � c� �� - gib• � _ 000••' - O O O 0 `'� O O,y.: �e s �' : r -.. �.a►' ., ;i' `.�' ; �r� •.:� .: es: a � � ,��: tq 4 . •// ., �;, <x sx .fit+. t O r c h a h 6 t CIVIC CENTER APRICOTS CHERRIES PRUNES OAK OR WILD TFzEE6 if i "CREE K (DO 00 o @@ 0000 (Do Gee@ wee (DID e000 00000 Q@ (b ow Q G@ (D 0 Gee go as) R e 0 19) Q 0 0 0 @ (2) ®Q o G (9) (Do OGG) @ (D as (D (11 Q G so e (D 0 Q 0 o 00 Q 0 10 Z) 00A (2) 60 Goa 0 g 0 o0a (Dee (Do(D 00 e a 0 @ G 0 0 (D o(q G (3) 00 0 Qla &GOO Goo* a* a @900000 , G000ees (b o 12) (a *0 0 0 (QED) a o o e 'a p G (9) @a 40 4b 00 eve Goo le) ARN 40 Goo ADOPT ATREE KIOSK(M (D 0 ACCESS (Doe qo ROAD- a (Do SARATOUA > 0 Goo 00 (Be LIBRARY _Q) (Doo @ opooss 0 (b swo Go (b aN f3i (01 o 0 (D 0 00 0 (Be a @04 be GOO Q (Do w. 9A AV FF?nl•l . _ 1.1-1 O�Tr14 a AnN N'Z'4nri ATOE PHnIVF 11in -� 101 '%aM a7RR Tt I 1 77 PLAM 1 01�. GL I PI-1 P? Pete Wilson, Governor CEQA and Historical Resources CEQA Technical Advice Series ���pF PLAN�yO T b a F CA11� GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 445 -4613 Pau! F Miner, Director Antero Rivasplata, Chief, State Clearinghouse May 1996 revision I I FROM-: Wagstaff and Associates PHONE NO. : 510 540 4788 Jul. 23 2001 03:42PM P3 CEQA and Historlcal Resources The CEQA Technical Advice Series is intended to offer CEQA practitioners, particularly at the local level, concise information about some aspect of the California Environmental Quality Act. This series of occasional papers is part of OPR's public education and training program for planners, developers, and others. Acknowledgment The author thanks Carol Roland of the State Office of Historic Preservation for substantial help in preparing this advisory paper. Her generous assistance contributed greatly to the quality of the following document 2 • Go --oea Office of planning and Research FROM : Wagstaff and Associates PHONE NO. : 510 540 4788 Jul. 23 2001 03:42PM P4 CEQR and Nist+vrfca/ Resources Introduction hen a proposed project may adversely affect a historical resource, the Cali- fornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the Lead Agency to carefully consider the possible impacts before proceeding (Public Resources Code Sections 21084 and 21084.1). Revisions to the Act made in 1992, par- ticularly Chapter 1075 of the Statutes of 1992, have highlighted the. importance of evaluating possible impacts upon historic resources_ This advisory paper discusses how CEQA applies to city and county decisions on proposed projects which may potentially impact or otherwise involve historic resources. CEQA exists to ensure that governmental decisionmakers consider the potential significant environmental effects of proposed projects before talang action. The Lead Agency is responsible for determining whether a significant adverse envi- ronmental impact may occur and whether it can be mitigated to a level of insignificance. 'Where substantial evidence indicates that a significant adverse effect may occur, the lead decisioamaking agency is required to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) which discusses in detail the potential impact and feasible means of avoidiag or reducing it Where such an effect may be miti- gated to a level of iiWguificance through changes in the project or other requirements, a mitigated Negative Declaration should be prepared rather than an EIR. CEQA and historical Resources is advisory only. Although it supplements the CEQA Guide- lines (Guidelines) on this topic, it does not amend or replace the regulations represented by the Guidelines. All code references herein are to the Public Resources Code unless otherwise noted. Govamoes Office of Planning and Research • 3 1-HUM,: Uagctaf r and ticcooiatcc PHUI.16 MU. : b1L0 blLO 1/69W CEQA and Histodcal Resources Background on Historical Resources Preservation here are a number of ways in which local communities and the State encourage or require the preservation of California's historical resources. Before delving into how the CEQA requirements augment this preservation activity, a short overview of State and local pres- ervation mechanism is in order. Keep in mind that while the immediately following discussion re- views historic preservation programs, the focus of this advisory paper is on the CEQA- mandated process of evaluating development projects for potential significant effects on historical resources. The State The State Historic Resources Commission and the Office of Historic Preservation (SHPO) within the Department of Parks and Recreation adminis- ter California's historic preservation programs. The appointed Commission's pertinent duties in- clude: evaluating applications and recommend- ing properties for listing on the National Register of Historic places; maintaining a statewide inven- tory of historical resources, including historical landmarks and points of interest; establishing cri- teria for recording and preserving historical re- sources; developing and adopting criteria for re- habilitatioag historic structures; developing and annually updating a statewide historic resources plan, overseeing administration of the California Register ofHistoric Places, including recommend- ing standards for the evaluation of historic re- sources for inclusion in the register; and develop- ing criteria and procedures for selecting enhance- ment and preservation projects for funding under the National Historic Preservation Fund, the Cali- fornia Heritage Fund, and other finding programs (Section 5020.4). SHPO's duties include: serving as staff to the Commission; overseeing State agency compliance with State preservation statutes and programs; 4 • Governor's Offico Of Planning and Research Jui. -{S :..dWl LOS :1ISPM Pb administering Federal preservation programs in California.; administering State programs such as the California Register, providing information and technical assistance to agencies and the public; and reviewing and commenting on the impact on historic resources of publicly funded projects and programs (Section 5020.6). The California Register of Historical Re- sources is an authoritative guide to identifying the State's historical resources. It establishes a list of those properties which are to be protected from substantial adverse change (Section 5024.1). A historical resource may be listed in the Cali- fornia Register if it meets any of the following criteria: (1) it is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pat- terns of California's history and cultural heritage; (2) it is associated with the lives of persons im- portant in California's past; (3) it embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic value; or (4) it has yielded or is likely to yield information important in prehistory or history_ The Register includes properties which are listed or have been formally determined to be eli- gible for listing in the National Register, State Historical Landmarks, and eligible Points of His- torical Interest. Other resources require nomination for inclu- sion in the Register. These may include resources contributing to the significance of a local historic district, individual historical resources, historical resources identified in historic resources surveys conducted in accordance with SHPO procedures, historic resources or districts designated under a local ordinance consistent with Couunission pro- cedures, and local landmarks or historic proper- ties designated under local ordinance. An individual resource, district, or local land- mark may be nominated for inclusion in the Reg- rKI IN . 1.1,4 gti TA# + rl nn H Intl ri T.P" rHI 11Vr IVI 1. 71 VI 7uVl a (MM .111 1 _ /.1 /VIVA VLl. u.lrl'I rH ister by a resident, a landowner, or a local govern- ment The Commission will review each request, after providing the opportunity for affected prop- erty owners, local agencies, and interested persons to comment on the proposed listing, before deter - mining whether to include the resource on the Register (Section 5024.1). If the local government objects to the nomination, the Commission must make supportive findings for any listing. Nomi- nations for which there is owner objection will not be placed in the Register, but may nonethe- less be listed as eligible. There are several State and federal programs which directly promote historic preservation. In order to encourage rehabilitation, rather than demolition or removal of historic values, the State Historical Building Code (Health and Safety Sec- tion 18950, et seq.) can be applied to qualifying structures. This allows repairs, renovations, and other construction in variance to the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The Mills Act (Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 439 et seq.) offers property tax relief in exchange for an agreement from the property owner to maintain the historic resource for a period of 10 years. The Marks His- torical Rehabilitation Act authorizes cities, coun- ties and redevelopment agencies to issue tax -ex- empt revenue bonds to finance the rehabilitation of significant historic buildings. In addition, Fed- eral investment tax credits are also available for qualified rehabilitation of historic structures. The State Office of Historic Preservation pub- lishes a guide, The Survey of Surveys which lists all local resource surveys known to the SD PO. The State Office also provides a fact sheet about the California Register. Guidelines for the nomination of properties to the California Register are being developed by SHPO and may be available by the beginning of 1997. The SIVO can be contacted at: 1416 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA. 95814 (916) 653 -6624 CE04 and W9Wrlaa/ Resources Other good sources of information on local surveys and designations are the city or county planning department and the local historical soci- ety. Specific information about a property identi- fied in a formal survey can be obtained through the I I regional Information Centers for CaUfor- Wa. Historical Resources (formerly the Regional Archaeological Information Centers). A list of these centers is found in Appendix 2. Local Govemnwnt Cities and counties use a number of tools to identify and protect historical resources. For in- stance, at least 60 cities and counties have adopted general plan elements containing detailed policies on historic preservation or historic structures. About 20 percent of California's cities and coun- ties (1986) have completed historic resource sur- veys. A variety of local actions directly protect his- torical resources by limiting the kinds of changes that can be made to them. Historic preservation ordinances for identified landmarks, historic dis- tricts, and other qualifying resources which require consideration of a use permit or other discretion- ary permit prior to changes in the resource are the most effective means of protection. Architectural design controls, for example, generally require that proposed alterations receive the review and ap- proval of an architectural review commission or board. In order to encourage owners to preserve significant properties, some localities assist own- ers in obtaining low - interest rehabilitation loans, help finance improvements through redevelop- ment or other activities (particularly in historic business districts), and may engage in outright purchase to protect the integrity of historic re- sources. Govemor's Office of Planning and Research - 5 CEQA and Historical Resources Provisions EQA does not apply to ministerial actions which may impact a historical resource. For example, a project which complies with the Uniform Building Code and for which no discretionary permit is required does not fall under CEQA, even if the project may alter a build- ing which is considered a "qualified historic struc- ture" under the State Historical Building Code (Pr,enriss a City of South Pasadena (1993) 15 Cal.App.4th 85). Common ministerial actions in- clude roof replacement, interior remodeling, or other activities which require only a non- discre- tionary building permit. A ministerial action ap- plies fixed standards or objective measurements and involves "little or no personal judgment by a public official as to the wisdom or manner of car- rying out the project" (Guidelines Section 15369). CEQA does apply to discretionary projects and equates a substantial adverse change in the sig- nificance of a historical resource with a signifi- cant effect on the environment (Section 21084.1). Further, the Act explicitly prohibits the use of a categorical exemption within the CEQ14 Guide- lines for projects which may cause such a change (Section 21084). "Substantial adverse change" is defined as demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration activities which would impair histori- cal significance (Section 5020.1). This effectively requires preparation of a miti- gated Negative Declaration or an EIR whenever a project may adversely impact historic resources. Current CEQA law provides that an EIR must be prepared whenever it can be fairly argued, on the basis of substantial evidence in the administrative record, that a project may have a si,guificant effect on a historical resource (Guidelines Section 15064). A mitigated Negative Declaration may be 114PO4 U11werr. AX). ro +abhaliy significant efforts can be mitigated to a level of insignificance (Section 21080). For example, a mitigated Negative Dec- laration may be adopted for a project which meets 6 • Govemor's Office of Planning and Resmrch the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabili- viion and local.historic preservation regulations, and so will not adversely affect the resource. Key Questions This presents the Lead Agency with two key questions which it must address in sequence. First, does a significant historical resource exist? Ab- sent a historical resource, the agency may proceed as usual and, depending upon the circumstances, may be able to apply a CEQA exemption to the project Second, where a significant historical re- source does exist, will the proposed project result in a substantial adverse change such that the quali- ties that matte the resource significant are impaired or lost? This question should be answered through preparation of an initial study for the project. Is a Historical Resource Present? Section 21084.1 is by turns both specific and vague in distinguishing the range of resources which may be considered historic. First, any re- source listed in, or eligible for listing in, the Cali- fornia Register of Historical Resources is pre- sumed to be historically or culturally significant. This includes listed archaeological resources (for example, California Landmark Number 838, The Indian Village of Tsurai). The Lead Agency's first step should be to consult the applicable Historical Resources File System Information Center to as- certain whether the resource is listed in the Cali- fornia Register. A side note: CEQA establishes two separate mechanisms for evaluating potential adverse ef- fects on archaeological resources. Section 210841.1 arrlipQ +A thQQi 1'PQQ11tY�PS +b.AT At'P listed in Or Plt_ gible to be listed in the California Register. Sec- tion 21083.2 applies to other `unique" archaeo- logical resources as well. For more information FROM.- Wdgstid++ dnd FissOCldZes PHONE NO. . 310 340 4788 Jul. 23 2001 03•43PI'I P8 on the application of CEQA to archaeological re- sources see CEQA and Archaeological Resources, published by OPR. Second, resources which are listed in a local historic register or deemed significant in a histori- cal resource survey as provided under Section 5024.1(g) are to be presumed historically or cul- turally significant unless "the preponderance of evidence" demonstrates they are not The next step is to consult the pertinent existing local register aual aw vcy. 13a►.aubo 4 heal xcgiatcr or survey mur not employ the same criteria as the California Register, listing or identification in a local survey does not necessarily establish if the property is eligible for listing on the Register. The Lead Agency will need to evaluate the resource in light of the Register's listing criteria (these will be in- cluded in guidelines expected to be released by SHPO in June 1994). The Lead Agency may de- tennine that the preponderance of evidence dem- onstrates that the property in question is not his- torically or culturally significant despite being listed on a local register or identified in a local historic survey. When making this determination, OPR strongly recommends that the agency cite for the record the specific, concrete evidence which supports that determination. Third, a resource that is not listed in, or deter- mined to be eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historic Resources, not included in a local register of historic resources, or not deemed significant in a historical resource survey may nonetheless be historically significant, pursuant to Section 21084.1. This provision is intended to give the Lead Agency discretion to determine that a resource of historic significance exists where none had been identified before and to apply the requirements of Section 21084.1 to properties that have not previously been formally recognized as historic. As the last step, the local agency should employ recognized criteria to determine whether a previously unrecognized significant historical resource exists. As always under CEQA, the lead agency must determine whether there is "substantial evidence" in the administrative record to support a finding of significant effect. Substantial evidence is de- fined in Public Resources Code Section 21080(e) as including "...facts, reasonable assumptions CEQA and N1SMa+g1 Resoar&09 predicated upon facts, and expert opinion sup- ported by facts." Unsubstantiated claims of his- torical significance do not require preparation of an EIR.(Citizen s Committee to Save Our Village v City of Claremont (1995) 37 Cal.App_4th 1157 — no substantial evidence existed that a landscape garden planned in 1905 was ever installed or main- tained). Will There be a Substantial Adveme Change? When a project would potentially affect a his- torical resource, the Lead Agency should prepare an initial study. The initial study, and the infor- mation upon which it is based, will provide a ba- sis for determining whether the project may re- sult in substantial adverse changes to the resource and, at the same time, a significant adverse envi- ronmental effect. Section 5020.1 establishes the threshold of "substantial adverse change" as demolition, de- struction, relocation, or alteration activities that would impair the significance of the historic re- source. One example might be the removal of a historic structure from a historic district, thereby affecting the cohesiveness of the district. Remod- eling a historic structure in such a way that its dis- tinctive nature is altered would be another. The Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilita- tion provide a standard guide to recommended (and not recommended) treatments to historic properties. The Standards may be obtained from SHPO. Section 21084.1 is intended to provide, in the form of CEQA mitigation measures or project al- ternatives, new protections for historical resources which may be adversely changed by a project. Presumably, the Lead Agency may conclude that a project will have no significant environmental effect when there is no substantial evidence of an adverse change. Buildings and other historic re- sources protected from adverse changes by local regulations such as a historic district designation or historic preservation ordinance, may logically be expected not to suffer such changes as long as the project complies with those regulations. Where such protective regulations exist, or where miti- gating conditions of approval are imposed, the initial study for the development project may cite Gwanwea Office of Planning and Ressamh - I FROM. ' Wasctarr and (lccooiatac CEQA and Historical Resources _F PHONE h10. = S10 S40 .1799 Jul. 03 0001 03= 1GPM P9 them as evidence that no impact will occur, or that any unpacts will be mitigated to a level of insig- nificance. Either a Negative Declaration or miti- gated Negative Declaration could be adopted un- der those circumstances. In Citizen's for Responsible Development in West Hollywood v City of West Hollywood (1995) 39 Cal.AppAth 925, a California appellate court upheld a city's mitigated negative declaration on essentially the same grounds as discussed above. The project consisted of a 40 -unit low- income lwueiug ptojcct which would rehabilitate and re- store two craftsman-style buildings on the front of the property and demolish another four build- ings in the rear. West Hollywood had established a "Craftsman District" which encompassed the front buildings for purposes of historic preserva- tion and established a Cultural Heritage Advisory Board (CHAB) to evaluate proposed activities within the district. When creating the District, the city had considered including the rear buildings within its boundaries, but concluded that they were not historically significant. The housing project was reviewed and approved by the CHAB as be- ing benign relative to the architectural features and historic value of the front buildings and in con- formance with the Secretary of Interior's rehabili- tation standards. The court found that there was no substantial evidence to support Citizen's claim that a histori- cal resource was being adversely impacted by the project. Those structures deemed to be of histori- cal importance were being rehabilitated and re- stored in accordance with adopted city, state, and federal regulations. The structures proposed for demolition were neither on a historic register, nor eligible for listing in the California Register, and their potential historical significance had been dis- missed Am study by the city during creation of the Craftsman District. Under the circumstances, the city was justified in adopting a mitigated Nega- tive Declaration. 8 • Govemoes Office of Planting and Research Where there is no protective ordinance or other regulation inplace or where protective actions such as mitigation measures are insufficient to avoid a "substantial adverse change" in the resource, the Lead Agency should conclude that an adverse change will occur. In that case, an EIR must be prepared. As mentioned before, for purposes of CEQA a substantial adverse change in the histori- cal resource is the equivalent of a significant ad- verse environmental effect. Hsatarioal Eico- Foes aril No#wral A+oaa#aro Most projects undertaken to demolish or re- place property or facilities damaged as a result of a disaster for which a state of emergency has been declared are statutorily exempt from CEQA (sub- division (b), Section 21080). Notwithstanding that exemption, actions in the aftermath of a disaster which might adversely affect historical resources are subject to State laws governing consideration of historical resources. Section 5028 provides that no structure listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register, or a local register that has been damaged as a result of a natural disaster is to be demolished, destroyed, or significantly altered (except for alterations to preserve or enhance his- toric value) unless: (1) the structure represents "an imminent threat to the public of bodily harm or of damage.to adjacent property," or (2) the ac- tion is approved by the SHPO. That section fur- ther establishes the procedure for review of pro- posed actions by the SHPO. In the wake of an earthquake, flood, fire, or other natural disaster the local agency may only demolish or destroy those structures which are an "imminent threat" In all other cases, the local agency must notify and consult with SHPO im- mediately ifthere are damaged historical resources which may require demolition, destruction, or sig- nificant alterations. FRum : Wagstaff and Hssociates HHUNE NU. : b1Id b4Id 4e88 Jul. ;2S :2Idui Id,5:4eFIM F'10 CEQA and Historical Resources Appendix 1 Excerpts from Public Resources Code Excerpts from Public Resources Code Section 5020.1: (h) "Historic district" means a definable unified geo- graphic entity that possesses a significant concen- tration, linkage, or continuity of sites, buildings, structures, or objects united historically or aestheti- cally by plan or physical development (i) Historical landmark" means any historical resource which is registered as a state historical landmark pursuant to Section 5021. (j) "Historical resource" includes, but is not limited to, any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which is historically or archaeologically significant, or is significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic ag- ricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California. (k) "Local register of historic resources" means a list of properties officially designated or recognized as historically significant by a local government pursuant to a local ordinance or resolution. (q) "Substantial adverse change" means demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of an historical resource would be impaired Subdivision (9) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1: (g) A resource identified as significant in an histori- cal resource survey may be listed in the California Register if the survey meets all of the following criteria. (1) The survey has been or will be included in the State Historic Resources Inventory _ (2) The survey and the survey documentation were prepared in accordance with office procedures and requirements. (3) The resource is evaluated and determined by the office [of Historic Preservation] to have a signifi- cance rating of Category I to 5 on DPR Form 523. (4) If the survey is five or more years old at the time of its nomination for inclusion in the California Registry, the survey is updated to identify histori- cal resources which have become eligible or ineli- gible due to changed circumstances or further documentation and those which have been demol- ished or altered in a manner that substantially di- minishes the significance of the resource. Public Resources Code Section 21098.1: A project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the en- vironment. For purposes of this section, an historical resource is a resource listed in, or determined to be eligible for listing in, the California Register of Iiis- torical Resources. Historical resources included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in sub- section (k) of Section 5020. 1, are presumed to be his- torically or culturally significant for purposes of this section, unless the preponderance of the evidence dem- onstrates that the resource is not historically or cultur- ally significant. The fact that a resmu -ce is not listed in, or determined to be eligible for listing in, the Cali- fornia Register of Historical Resources, not inchrded in a local register ofhistoricai resources, ornot deemed significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (g) of Section 5024.1 shall not preclude a lead agency from determining whether the resource may be an his- torical resource for purposes of this section. Governor's ogre of Planning and Rewmrdr - 9 FROM: Wagstaff and Associates CE61A and Historical Resources PHONE NO. : 510 540 47ee Jul. 23 2001 03:47PM P11 Appendix 2 Historical Resources Information Centers The following institutions are under agreement with the Office of Historic Preservation to: 1. Integrate newly discovered Resources and information on known Resources into the California Historical Resources File System; 2. Supply information on known Resources and sruveys'to government, institutions, and individuals who have a justifiable need to know; and 3. Supply a list of consultants who are qualified to do archeological field work within their area. Office of Historic Preservation Department of Parks and recreation P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296 -0001 (916) 653 -6624 Fax (916) 653 -9824 Coordinators: W. William C, Seidel, Staff Archaeologist, (916) 653 -9125 Ms. Jan Wooley, Staff Historian, (916) 653 -9019 Information Centers Dr. David A. Fredrickson, Coordinator Northwest Information Center Department ofAnthropoiogy Sonoma State University Rohneat Park, CA 94928 Attu: Leigh Jordan (707) 6642494 Fax (707) 664 -3947 Serving Alameda, Colusa, Contra Costa, ,Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mann, Mendocino, Monterey, Napa, San Benito, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, and Yolo Counties. Dr. Mark Kowla, Coordinator Northeast Information Center Department ofAnthropology, Colusa 103 California State University, Chico Chico, CA 95929 -0400 Attn: Bill Dreyer (916) 898 -6824 Fax (916) 8986824 Serving Butte, Glenn, Lassen, Modoc, Plumas, Shasta, Sierra, Sishiyou. Sutter, Tehama, and Trinity Counties, 10 - Governor's Office of Pkanning and Research Dr. Jerald J. Johnson, Coordinator North Central Wormation Center Department of Anthropology California State University, Sacramento 6000 J Street Sacramento, CA 95819 -5162 Attu: Marianne Russo (916) 278-6217 Pax(916)278-5162 Serving Amador, El Dorado, Nevada, Placer, Sacramento, and Yuba Counties. Ms. Elizabeth Crreathouse, Coordinator Central California Information Center Department ofAnthropology California State University, Stanislaus 801 W. Monte Vista Avenue Turlock, CA 95382 Attn: Alice Lawrence (209) 667 -3307 Fax (209) 6673333 Serving Alpine, Calaveras, Mariposa, Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Tuolumne Counties. Ms. Catherine Lewis Pruett, Coordinator Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Centex California State University, Bakersfield 9001 Stockdale Highway. Bakersfield, CA 93311 -1099 (805) 664 -2289 Fax (805) 6643194 Serving Fresno, Xern, Kings, Madera, and Tldare Counties. FPnm ! I,IapC +arr and Accnria +-Q Pwnwp wn ' S1A -,an 47PP T, l '-)Z ',DMPI M7'dPPM P1'7 Dr. Michael A. Glassow, Coordinator Celnaml Coastal Information Center Department of Anthropology University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara, CA 93106 (805) 893 -2427 Serving San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties. Dr_ Lynn Christenson, Coordinator South Coastal information Center Social Sciences Research Laboratory San Diego State University San Diego, CA 92182 -0436 Attn: Ian Culbert (619) 594 -5682 Fax (619) 594 -1358 ,Serving San Diego County. San Bernardino Archaeological Information Center San Bernardino County Museum 2024 Orange Tie mane Redlands, CA 92374 (909) 792 -1497 Fax (909) 798 -8585 Serving San Bernardino County. CROA snd Historical Resounres Eastern loformation Center Deparmient ofAnthropology University of California, Riverside Riverside, CA 92521 (909) 787 -5745 Fax (909) 787 -5404 Serving Inyo, Mono, and .Riverside Counties. Mr. Jay Von Werlhof, Coordinator Southeast Information Center Imperial Valley College Museum P.O. Box 3490 El Centro, CA 92244 Atta: Ray Wilcox (619)352 -8320 Ext. 471 Serving Imperial County. Dr. Lynn Gamble, Coordinator South Central Coastal Information Center Institute ofArchaeology University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA 90024-15 10 (310) 825 -1980 Fax (310) 206-4723 Serving Los Angeles, Orange, and Ventura Counties. Govorrw>'s Oft* of Pbmning and Research a 11 P r%1irO.1r �Jrl mar �.Arn .a�nn II. THE NATIONAL REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION" Ze quality of significance in rican history, architecture, ar- cheology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess in- tegrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and: • That are associated with events that have made a significant con- tribution to the broad patterns of our history; or • That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or • That embody the distinctive char- acteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose com- ponents may lack individual dis- tinction; or - That have yielded, or may be like- ly to yield, information important in prehistory or history. CRITERIA CONSIDERATIONS Ordinarily cemeteries, birthplaces, or graves of historical figures, proper- ties owned by religious institutions or used for religious purposes, struc- tures that have been moved from their original locations, reconstructed historic buildings, properties primari- ly commemorative in nature, and properties that have achieved sig- nificance within the past 50 years shall not be considered eligible for the National Register. However, such properties will qualify if they are integral parts of districts that do meet the criteria or if they fall within the following categories: • A reli gious property deriving primary significance from ar- chitectural or artistic distinction or historical importance; or • A building or structure removed from its original location but which is significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the surviving structure most im- portantly associated with a his- toric person or event; or • A birthplace or grave of a histori- cal figure of outstanding import tance if there is no appropriate site or building directly as- sociated with his productive life; or • ,A cemetery which derives its primary significance from graves of persons of transcendent impor- tance, from age, from distinctive design features, or from associa- tion with historic events; or • A reconstructed building when accurately executed in a suitable environment and presented in a dignified manner as part of a res- toration master plan, and when no other building or structure with the same association has sur- vived; or • A property primarily com- memorative in intent if design, age, tradition, or symbolic value has invested it with its own excep- tional significance; or • A property achieving significance within the past 50 years if it is of exceptional importance. 3ne Criteria for Evaluation are found in the Code of Federal Rtgulations, Title 36, Part 60, and are reprinted herein full. FROM*: Wagstaff and Associates NPS Form 10-900 (Oct. 1990) tlntted States Department of the Interior Natlonal Park Service PHONE NO. : 510 540 4788 Jul. 23 2001 03:49PM P14 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form OMB No. 100240018 This form is for use in rrominating or requesting determinations forindlvldual. properties and districts.. Sae Instructions in How to Caompfete the Nadonal 99gisw of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marling 'X' in ftre appropriate bout or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "NIA" for "not applicable.' For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of signiftcance, enter only categories and subcategories from the Instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word proomor, or computer, to complete all item5.- 1 Name of Property historic name other names/site number 2. Location street & number ❑ not for publication city or town ❑ vicinity state code county 3 State/Federal Agency Certification ..... As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby ce" that this ❑ nomination ❑ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CM Part 60. In my opinion, the property ❑ meets (j does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant ❑ nationally ❑ statewide ❑ locally. (❑ See continuation sheet for addhlof%W comments) Signature of certifying official itle Date State of Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property ❑ meets ❑ does not meet the National Register CAtarla. (❑ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying otficiauTwe Date State or f=ederal agency and bureau 4. National Paris Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: Signature of the Keeper Date of Action ❑ entered in the National Register. ❑ See continuation street. ❑ determined eligible for the National Register ❑ See continuation sheet. ❑ determined not eligible for the -National Register. ❑ removed from the National Register. ❑ other., (explain:) FROM Wagstaff and Associates Name of Property PHONE NO. : 510 540 4788 Jul. 23 2001 03:49PM P15 County and State 5. Clegstfication 5. 4 of property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes as aPPtY) (Check only one box) (Do not Include previousy listed resources In the count -) C3 private ❑ public -local ❑ publio-State 0 public-Federal O building(s) O district D site ❑ structure O object Contributing Noncontribut)ng buildings sites structures IN Name of related multiple property listing Number of contributing resources previously listed (Enter "NIA" if property is not part of a muMpie property listing.) in the National Register 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from Instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) foundation walls roof other Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) FROM-: Wagstaff and Associates Name of Property PHONE NO. : 510 540 4788 Jul. 23 2001 03:50PM P16 County and State S. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria 'Areas of Significance (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property (Enter Categories from instructions) for National Register listing.) ❑ A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history.. ❑ B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. ❑ C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. ❑ D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply.) Property is. El A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. ❑ B removed from its original location. ❑ C a birthplace or grave. O D a cemetery. ❑ E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. 0 F a commemorative property. ❑ G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past 50 years. Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) Period of Significance Significant Dates Significant Person (Complete if Criterion 8 is marked above) Cultural Affiliation Architect/Builder 9. Maior Blbllographical References Bibliography (Cke the books, articles. and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS): ❑ preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR M has been requested ❑ previously listed in the National Register ❑ previously determined eligible by the National Register O designated a National Historic Landmark ❑ recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey ❑ recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # Primary location of additional data: O State Historic Preservation Office ❑ Other State agency ❑ Federal agency ❑ Local government ❑ University ❑ Other Name of repository: FPr1M I,Iapatarr and ACCnriatP4 Name of Property Pwnwp Nil : c�1 A -,an a7pp Ti 1 1 '77 '.'WW1 1A7' cWPM P1-2 County and State 10 Geographical Data Acreage of Property UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet) 1L_►_Jllll�l.l1�1111�1 3LLIIiI I I i I I I I Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 2 lI1I,I JI I I I I 1 1 J 4L- JIIilLi1 L11111 ❑ See continuation sheet Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) 11. Form Prepared By nameftitle organization date street & number telephone city or town Additional Documentation Submit the following Items with the completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps state zip code A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic. districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional Items) this item at the request of SHPO or name street & number telephone city or town state zip code Paperwork Reduetkm Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Hlstorlo Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request Is required to obtain a benefit In accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 of aeq_). Faemated 8urdon Stateffmnt! Public reporting burden for this forth Is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response Including time for reviewing Instructions. gathering and maintalning data. and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regaMing this burden astimete or arty aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Perk Service, P.O. EkU 37127, Washington, DC 20013.7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Projects (10240018), Washington, OC 20803.