HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-13-04 packet (2)r
City of Saratoga
HERITAGE PRESERVATION
COMMISSION
Date: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 8:30 a.m.
Place: Warner Hutton House, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Type: Regular Meeting
The HPC will meet at 8:30 for site visits for items III. A,
B, C, AND D. Please meet in the front parking lot by the Warner Hutton House and
staff will provide transportation to the sites.
I. Routine Organization
A. Roll Call
B. Approval of minutes from 3/9/04
C. Posting of Agenda — Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, the
agenda was posted on Thursday April 8, 2004
D. Oral & Written Communication - Any member of the public may address the
Commission about any matter not on the agenda for this meeting for up to
three minutes. Commissioners may not comment on the matter but may choose
to place the topic on a future agenda.
II. Old Business
A. Historic Park Grant Update
B. Bring Historic Park Master Plan to City Council for approval
C. Update status of Mills Act Contract from April 7th CC meeting
D. Make a recommendation on the Sam Cloud House to the Council
E. Prepare report to Council on the using the grant money for the restoration of
McWilliams House, and Historic Park Review both proposals for
improvements to the McWilliams House that were included in the Grant
Application. Recommend one or a combination of both to the Council.
F. Placing brass plaques on historic houses
G. Approve an HPC Work Plan to be approved by City Council with proposed
budget f at k Fj .4� 4- Fj o ° -t�•
III. New Business
A. Review proposed addition to potential historic structure at 14601 Aloha
Avenue built in 1941
B. Review proposed addition to potential historic structure at 20288 La Paloma
built in circa 1924
C. Review the proposed location for the flag pole in Blaney Plaza
D. Review proposed urn and pedestal in Blaney Plaza to commemorate WW II
veterans
i'
IV. Items to be placed on the next Agenda
V. Pending Items
A. Review list of properties with structures 50 years and over in age.
B. Retreat
C. Historic Calendar
D. Adopt a Tree Program for the Heritage Orchard
E. Historic Preservation Data Base
VI. Adjournment
9:00 a.m. Tuesday May 13, 2004, Warner Hutton House, 13777 Fruitvale Ave
Please advise the Chair if you will be absent from the next scheduled meeting
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a disabled person and
you need a disability - related modification or accommodation to participate in this
meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 408.868.1269 or ctclerkna.saratoga.ca.us
Requests must be made as early as possible and at least one full business day before the
start of the meeting.
Certificate of Posting of Agenda:
I, John F. Livingstone, Associate Planner for the City of Saratoga, declare that the
foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Heritage Preservation Commission of the City of
Saratoga was posted on April. 8, 2004 at the office of the City of Saratoga, 13777
Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga, CA 95070 and was available for public review at that location.
The agenda is also available on the City's website at www.saratoga.ca.us.
Signed this 8`h day of April 2004 at Saratoga, California.
John F. Livingstone, AICP
Associate Planner
868.1231
City of Saratoga
HERITAGE PRESERVATION
COMMISSION
MINUTES
Date: Tuesday, March 9, 2004 9:00 a.m.
Place: Warner Hutton House, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Type: Regular Meeting
I. Routine Organization
A. Roll Call: PRESENT — Ballingall, Koepernik, Peck, Lowdermilk, Conrado,
Bailey GUESTS — Jill Hunter, Sandra Dodge, Jean Ricket, Denise Goldberg,
Danielle Surdin, Conrad Herbert\
B. Approval of minutes from 2/1Q/04 — Approved 5 -0
C. Posting of Agenda — Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, the
agenda was posted on Thursday March 4, 2004
D. Oral & Written Communication - Any member of the public may address the
Commission about any matter not on the agenda for this meeting for up to
three minutes. Commissioners may not comment on the matter but may choose
to place the topic on a future agenda. Jean Ricket advised the HPC of photos
available from the Mustard Walk. Danielle Surdin, representing the Public
Safety Commission, updated the HPC on improvements to the intersection at
Herriman Ave and Saratoga Ave.
H. Old Business
A. Grant for Historic Park Status — Item Discussed
B. Decide who will attend the Historic National Conference — Item Discussed
C. Update status of Mills Act Contract — Item Discussed
D. Update on Sam Cloud House — Place on Agenda to make a recommendation
to the City Council.
III. New Business
A. Name Park trails — Park Commissioners made presentation on trails. The
HPC like the Heritage Loop Trail as a name.
B. Discuss results of joint meeting with City Council — Item Discussed
C. Placing brass plaques on historic houses — Item Discussed, HPC
recommended placing plaques on all Landmarks
D. Prepare HPC Work Plan to be approved by City Council with proposed
budget — Item Discussed
E. Review current budget and budget for next year — Item Discussed
IV. Items to be placed on the next Agenda - Make a recommendation to the City
Council on three Mills Act Applicants and the Sam Cloud building. Review
possible CLG Grants.
V. Pending Items - No Discussion
A. Review list of properties with structures 50 years and over in age.
B. Retreat
C. Historic Calendar
D. Adopt a Tree Program for the Heritage Orchard
E. Historic Preservation Data Base
VI. Adjournment
9:00 a.m. Tuesday March 9, 2004, Warner Hutton House, 13777 Fruitvale Ave
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a disabled person and
you need a disability - related modification or accommodation to participate in this
meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 408.868.1269 or ctderk(@saratoqa.Ga.us
Requests must be made as early as possible and at least one full business day before the
start of the meeting.
Certificate of Posting of Agenda:
—� I, John F. Livingstone, Associate Planner for the City of Saratoga, declare that the
foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Heritage Preservation Commission of the City of
Saratoga was posted on March 4, 2004 at the office of the City of Saratoga, 13777
Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga, CA 95070 and was available for public review at that location.
The agenda is also available on the City's website at www.saratoga.ca.us.
Signed this 4`h day of March 2004 at Saratoga, California.
John F. Livingstone, AICP
Associate Planner
868.1231
City of Saratoga
Heritage Preservation Commission
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Patricia Bailey, Chair
DATE: March 17, 2004
RE: Heritage Preservation Commission Work Program
Mission Statement
To provide guidance to the City of Saratoga in order to preserve and protect the
heritage resources of the community.
Recent Accomplishments
Historic Calendar Design & Sales
3rd Annual Mustard Walk
Site Visits & Review of 15 Historic Home Projects
Heritage Orchard Oversight & Recommendations
Heritage Resource & Mills Act Criteria Review with City Council
Historic Criteria Training Session with Planning Commission
Austin Way Heritage Lane - Design & Installation of Sign
McWilliams House & Book -Go -Round Restoration Recommendations
Historic Park Master Plan Development & Review
Historic Park Grant Application & Presentation to County
Joint Meeting with Historic Foundation regarding Village
Historic District Boundary Recommendations for Village
Heritage Orchard Information Booth at Library Grand - Reopening
Prepared standard for Mills Act Contract
Meeting and presentation to County Supervisor Liz Ness
The purpose of Heritage Preservation Commission is to:
(a) Safeguard the heritage of the City by providing for the protection of
irreplaceable heritage resources representing significant elements of its history;
(b) Enhance the visual character of the City by encouraging and regulating the
compatibility of architectural styles within historic areas which reflect established
architectural traditions;
(c) Encourage public knowledge, understanding and appreciation of the City's
past, and foster civic and neighborhood pride and sense of identity based upon
the recognition and use of the City's heritage resources;
(d) Stabilize and improve property values within the City and increase the
economic and financial benefits to the City and its inhabitants derived from the
preservation, rehabilitation, and use of heritage resources;
(e) Integrate the conservation of heritage resources into the public and private
development process and identify as early as possible and resolve conflicts between
the preservation of such resources and alternative land uses.
Proposed Work Program for July 2004 - July 2005
Priority in order from top to bottom
Cost
Review Approximately 20 Requests for Additions to Historic
No fees collected
Homes
Staff /HPC Time
Bring the Historic Park Master Plan to the Council for Review
Already funded for
and Approval
$30,000
Staff /HPC Time
Prepare a Restoration plan for the McWilliams House and Park
Funded by a grant
Grounds for Council Review
$100,000
Staff /HPC Time
Monitor the Restoration of the McWilliams House
Staff /HPC Time
Monitor the work on the Book -Go -Round
Staff /HPC Time
Qualify up to 3 homes for Mills Act
Deposit Account,
Fees charged to
applicant for Staff
Time
Mustard Walk
$2,000 for food and
advertising,
Staff /HPC Time
Historic Calendars
HPC Time
Apply to the State of California for Historic Landmark Status for
State Application
Hakone Gardens, City Museum, McWilliams House, Book -Go-
fees
Round, and the Warner Hutton House
Staff /HPC Time
Investigate State Historic Landmark #435
Staff /HPC Time
$50 fee research
and copy fee from
Sonoma State
Designate more Landmarks
Staff /HPC Time
Designate Oak Street and Horseshoe Lane Heritage Lanes
$2,000 for signs
Staff /HPC Time
Investigate Landmark Status of Heritage Orchard
HPC Time
Restart the Historic Homes Plaques Program
Plaques $100 each
Staff /HPC Time
Heritage Orchard Oversight
Staff /HPC Time
Prepare an Ado t -a -Tree Program
Staff /HPC Time
Adopt -a -Tree Kiosk
Funded as part of
the Heritage
Orchard Restoration
Update Heritage Resource List Management
Staff /HPC Time
Investigate Standards for Historic Signs
HPC Time
Powers and Duties of the Heritage Preservation Commission:
The Heritage Commission shall be advisory only to the City Council, the Planning
Commission and the agencies and departments of the City, and shall establish
liaison and work in conjunction with such authorities to implement the purposes of
this Chapter. The Heritage Commission shall have the following powers and
duties:
(a) Conduct, or cause to be conducted, a comprehensive survey of properties
within the boundaries of the City for the purpose of establishing the Heritage
Resource Inventory. To qualify for inclusion in the Heritage Resource Inventory, a
property must satisfy any one or more of the criteria listed in Section 13- 15.010 of
this Chapter. The Inventory shall be publicized and periodically updated, and a
copy thereof shall be kept on file in the Planning Department.
(b) Recommend to the City Council specific proposals for designation as a historic
landmark, heritage lane or historic district.
(c) Recommend to the appropriate City agencies or departments projects and
action programs for the recognition, conservation, enhancement and use of the
City's heritage resources, including standards to be followed with respect to any
applications for permits to construct, change, alter, remodel, remove or otherwise
affect such resources.
(d) Review and comment upon existing or proposed ordinances, plans or policies
of the City as they relate to heritage resources.
(e) Review and comment upon all applications for building, demolition, grading or
tree removal permits involving work to be performed upon or within a designated
historic landmark, heritage lane or historic district, and all applications for tentative
map approval, rezoning, building site approval, use permit, variance approval,
design review or other approval pertaining to or significantly affecting any heritage
resource. The Commission's comments shall be forwarded to the City agency or
department processing the application within thirty days after receiving the request
for such comments.
(f) Investigate and report to the City Council on the availability of federal, state,
county, local or private funding sources or programs for the rehabilitation and
preservation of heritage resources.
(g) Cooperate with county, state and federal governments and with private
organizations in the pursuit of the objectives of heritage conservation.
(h) Upon the request of a property owner or occupant and at the discretion of the
Heritage Commission, render advice and guidance on the conservation,
rehabilitation, alteration, decoration, landscaping or maintenance of any heritage
resource; such voluntary advice and guidance shall not impose any regulation or
control over any property.
(i) Participate in, promote and conduct public information and educational
programs pertaining to heritage resources.
(j) Perform such other functions as may be delegated to it by resolution or motion
of the City Council.
City of Saratoga
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: HPC
FROM: John F. Livingstone AICP, Associate Planner
DATE: April 13, 2004
RE: Review of Historic Structures: 14601 Aloha Avenue built in 1941, and 20288 La
Paloma built in circa 1924.
There are two proposed additions to houses on the Agenda for this meeting. All of the houses are
over SO years old. The following are the options the HPC has when reviewing the projects:
14601 Aloha Avenue
1. The structure appears to be of historic significance and a Historic Architect should evaluate
the structure and proposed addition.
2. The structure does not appear to be of historic significance and the applicant can proceed
with the proposed addition.
20288 La Paloma
The applicant came to the front planning counter interested in possibly demolishing or completely
remodeling the existing house. The structure was not listed on the City's Heritage Resource
Inventory, but because of the age and design of the home, staff recommended a preliminary review of
the historic significance of the home be prepared. A report by a Historic Architect was completed
and found the home to be of local historic significance (attached). The Project Architect working
with the Historic Architect came up with a design for an addition preserving the main portion of
the existing house. In order for the addition to meet the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) it should meet the Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation. Due to the project
being a new second story the application will go before the Planning Commission for design review
where the Commission will make the CEQA determination. The HPC has the following options:
1. Make findings recommending to the Planning Commission that the proposed project meets
the Secretary of Interior Standards in that the proposed project meets the need for
continuing or changing uses while retaining the property's historic character.
2. Recommend changes to proposed project design.
3. The HPC may also recommend the structure be placed on the Heritage Resource Inventory.
F
Page 1 of 11 *Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) 20288 La Paloma Street
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted a. County: Santa Clara
and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
b. USGS 7.5' Quad Cupertino Date Photorevised 1980 S 1 T 8s R 2W B.M. Mt. Diablo
c. Address 20288 La Paloma Street City Saratoga Zip 95070
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 10 586115 m E 41240122 mN
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)
Assessor's Parcel Number: 397 -23 -012
*P3a Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)
This one - story, wood - framed building is an intact local example of early twentieth -
century Mediterranean Style residential architecture in Saratoga. Set on a slight rise
above the sidewalk and facing the sloping street, the stucco house is one of a number of
houses in its neighborhood built around the same time, as part of a small, early suburban
subdivision. The house is off - center on its lot; the original driveway is on the
northwest, downhill, side, leading to a recent rear garage remodel and addition. The
southeast side setback is modest, accessible at the front by an arched gateway through a
stucco buttress that is an integral part of the front fagade of the house. The house is
raised slightly on an internally battered concrete foundation, and has an original
painted concrete stoop and walkway at the front entrance. The front landscaping appears
recent, and there is an ample rear yard with contemporary landscaping as well. The
painted stucco has a thick dashed finish. (Section P3a, Description, continued on pg. 3)
*133b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2
*P4 Resources Present: ® Building ❑ Structure ❑ Object ❑ Site ❑ District ❑ Element of District ❑ Other (Isolates, etc.)
*P1 1. Report Citation: (Site survey report and other souroas or enter none) N/A
P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, accession #)
Front of House, from northeast;
photo by L. Dill, July 2003
*P6. Date Constructed /Age and Sources:
® Historic ❑ Prehistoric ❑ Both
Circa 1924
*P7. Owner and Address:
Michael Filice
20288 La Paloma Street
Saratoga, CA 95070
*P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, and address)
Leslie Dill, Architect
Dill Design Group
110 N Santa Cruz Ave
Los Gatos, CA 95030
April Halberstadt,
Consulting Historian
*P9. Date Recorded: July 21, 2003
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive
*Attachments: ❑ NONE ❑ Location Map ❑ Sketch Map ® Continuation Sheet ® Building, Structure and Object Record ❑ Archaeological Record
❑ District Record ❑ Linear Feature Record ❑ Milling State Record ❑ Rock Art Record ❑ Artifact Record ❑ Photograph Record ❑ Other (List)
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
Page 2 of 11 *NRHP Status Code 5
20288 La Paloma Street
'Resource Name or # (Assigncd by recorder)
B1. Historic Name: N/A
B2. Common Name:
B3. Original use: Single - family residence B4. Present Use: Single - family residence
'B5. Architectural Style: Mediterranean Style
*B6. Construction History: (construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)
Constructed 1924; Recent addition to the rear of the house (unknown date circa 1981 -1982)
'B7. Moved? ® No ❑ Yes ❑ Unknown Date: N/A
"B8. Related Features: N/A
B9a Architect: Unknown
•B10. Significance: Theme Architecture
Period of Significance 1924
Original Location: N/A
b. Builder: Unknown
Area Saratoga, Santa Clara County
Property Type Residence Applicable Criteria N/A
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)
EARLY HISTORY - QUITO RANCHO
The first settlement in the vicinity of the property at 20288 La Paloma Terrace by
non - indigenous people occurred during the 1840s. In 1841, a rancho of three square
leagues (over 13,000 acres) was awarded to two soldiers from Monterey, Jose Zenon
Fernandez and Jose Noreiga, by Mexican Governor Alvarado. (Arbuckle:23) In 1844, Jo_
Noriega traded all of his interest in his rancho to Ignacio Alviso. When Alviso died
in 1848, the property was willed to his minor grandson, Manuel Alviso. In 1858, the
property was acquired by Jose Ramon Arguello, his mother, Soledad Arguello and a
business partner, S. M. Mezes. The Arguello family were real estate developers and
sold many parcels to interested farmers and ranchers.
After California became a state in 1850, legitimate titles to Mexican land grants had
to be verified (validated) by American courts. The claim to verify the title of the
Quito Rancho was filed in United States District Court in 1860. (Book A.of Maps: Page
112)
(Section B10, continued on page 4)
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (ustattributes and codes)
`B12. References:
Arbuckle, Clyde
1968 Santa Clara County Ranchos. San
Jose: Rosicrucian Press
1986 Clyde Arbuckle's History of San
Jose. San Jose: Memorabilia of San Jose
(Section B12, References, Continued on pg. 7)
B13. Remarks: Proposed for demolition
'B14. Evaluator: Leslie Dill
'Date of Evaluation: July 21, 2003
DPR 523B (1/95)
For Location Map:
See Continuation Sheet, Page 8
'Required information
Page 3 of 11 Resource Name or #(Assigned by Recorder) 20288 La Paloma street
Recorded By: L. Dill /A. Halberstadt Date: July 21, 2003 x Continuation _ Update
(Section P3a, Description, continued from page 1)
The footprint of the house is roughly "L" shaped in plan. The original, apparently one -
bedroom, portion of the structure is approximately rectangular with some recesses and
offsets that provide plan relief. A wing has been added recently across the rear and out
at the west corner, including a master bedroom suite and attached garage. This addition
incorporated at least part of an existing wood -clad outbuilding, and some of the previous
siding and details are still visible on the side elevation.
The front (northeast) portion of the house is protected by a moderately pitched, side -
gabled roof with an asymmetrically placed front gable. The front of this roof area is
clad with red Spanish tile roofing. The tile has a rough texture intended to make it
appear hand-wrought. Behind the ridgeline, facing to the rear, is composition roofing.
The rear two- thirds of the original house and the new addition have flat roofs with
small, shed - roofed tiled insets, such as over the side entrances and the buttress. The
sloped roof portions of the house have moderate eaves with exposed, shaped rafter tails
with exposed v- groove sheathing. The flat -roof portions of the original house have only
plain painted metal coping at the parapet walls. The scuppers and downspouts are very
simple.
The front (northeast) elevation is comprised of three stepped vertical planes. The north
corner of the house is set back, and encloses the front - facing entrance with a painted
wood ten -lite French door flanked by sidelights. A stucco segmented -arch relief tops the
doorway unit. Stepping forward is an intermediate wall plane that features only a single
casement window and a lower stepped roof section. This window is typical of the other
original windows, with standard wood stucco molding and sills. The most forward portion
of the front wall is centered under the gable end, and features a large arched picture
window (single lite) and a decorative attic vent built of stacked Spanish tile. The
picture window is inset with a built -out stucco sill. This wall plane extends to the
southeast to create the flying buttress side yard entrance. The gate in this arched
opening is curved, with decorative scroll corner details similar to the cut rafter tails.
The northwest (driveway) side elevation features a pair of tall casement windows at the
front (east) corner entry area, off - center under the side gable. A small double -hung
window is in this wall as well, and the attic vent matches the front tile detail. To the
rear of this portion of the house is the bedroom wing with its flat roof. It projects
slightly in plan, and at the corner of this wing and the front wing, there is a small
lean -to with a front - facing, tiled shed roof encloses a utility closet and underfloor
access. The bedroom wing has a pair of centered one - over -one double -hung wood windows.
Behind this area is the continuation of the original residence, enclosing the bathroom,
kitchen and laundry. Randomly placed double -hung windows of various sizes fenestrate this
area, and a side entry is recessed off the driveway, and covered by an inset shed roof
with Spanish tile roofing. At the rear of this elevation is the more recent bedroom and
garage addition. The new stucco is differentiated from the original with a skip trowel
finish, and the overhead garage door is modern in appearance. The side elevation of this
wing (northwest) is clad with horizontal wooden lap siding and has plain exposed rafter
tails, but has scroll -cut rake boards that are similar to the original cut rafter tails.
The rear of the house is primarily taken up with the new bedroom /garage wing. This wing
is stucco with wood French door and casement windows, and has a flat roof with some flat
stucco fascia trim. The visible portion of the rear of the original wing appears to have
been modified with the addition of an arched transom window over rear French doors.
DPR 523L (1/95)
Page 4 of 11 Resource Name or #(Assigned by Recorder) 20288 La Paloma street
Recorded By: L. Dill /A. Halberstadt Date: July 21, 2003 x Continuation _ Update
The center of the southeast fagade of the house has a wide recessed side patio entry into
the dining room. This area has an inset shed roof with cut rafter tails set onto a 4 x 6
beam. To the rear of this area, the kitchen wing has a flat roof with new casement
windows under a new arched transom. The front, living room, portion of the house features
tall casement windows flanking a battered clinker brick chimney centered in the gable
end. The living room also has a window that opens onto the recessed porch.
The interior of the house has many intact original elements, including light fixtures, an
art tile fireplace surround with bas - relief keystone and tile hearth, original wood trim
and built -in cabinets, inlaid hardwood floors, and some utilitarian features from the
early twentieth century, such as a built -in ironing board and folding, pop -up telephone
seat.
This residence has remarkable integrity, considering its change in size over time. It
clearly represents the development of the neighborhood in Saratoga, it has forms and
features that present a distinctive Mediterranean Style appearance, and it has had few
changes over the years that impact the main living space of the house.
(Section B10, Significance continued from pg. 2)
EARLY LAND OWNERSHIP
The property on which the house is situated is associated with the early development
Saratoga Village and is situated a short distance below the intersection known as the
Saratoga Crossroads. Although much of the surrounding land was originally platted into
160 -acre and 80 -acre homestead lots, the properties along the Saratoga Road were platted
into smaller 6- to 10 -acre parcels beginning around the late 18701s. This was due in
part to the rolling hillside terrain and also due to the financial benefits of fruit
orchards.
From the time of the Quito Rancho, the subject parcel was a portion of a homestead
acreage that was sold several times, becoming the La Paloma Terrace Subdivision in 1915.
The earliest owner in the 1850s seems to have been Levi Millard, Saratoga's first
postmaster. A portion of his holdings was sold to R. Parker, who held property on both
sides of Saratoga Avenue.
By 1897, the subject lot was part of the estate settlement of Mary Parker, according to a
map filed in August of that year. A portion of the estate was acquired by W. Kennedy in
1897 and the subject ten acre lot is noted as part of the Kennedy holdings. Kennedy is
also shown as the owner on the 1903 Official County map. (MacMillan:1903)
La Paloma Terrace is one of four small subdivisions in Saratoga, all clustered together
at the northeastern corner of the Crossroads. They were developed between approximately
1908 and 1920, as the newly -built Peninsular Interurban Railway made suburban Saratoga
more accessible to Santa Clara Valley residents who did not drive or yet own an
automobile. The four subdivisions include Saratoga Park (1908) offered by developer
David Bell; Orchard Place, which was sold by the Woods family; La Paloma Terrace (1915),
developed by T. S. Montgomery; and Lutheria Way, offered by Luther Cunningham in the
1920s. These four subdivisions are some of the very few housing clusters in Santa Cl
Valley that can be characterized as a "streetcar suburb ". Although there are many
examples of this type of development in eastern America, few other developments of this
type appear in this area.
DPR 523L (1/95)
0
Page 5 of 11 Resource Name or #(Assigned by Recorder) 20288 La Paloma Street
Recorded By: L. Dill /A. Halberstadt Date: July 21, 2003 x Continuation _ Update
In 1915, the subject parcel of 10 acres was subdivided and lots for new home sites were
offered for sale by T. S. Montgomery. La Paloma Terrace was one of Saratoga's earliest
residential subdivisions that was developed and marketed as a complete neighborhood.
Until that time, orchard acreage had been offered for sale to buyers who could carve out
a few acres and build their own homes. Developer T. S. Montgomery was an early leader in
offering houses with all the urban amenities already in place. His Naglee Park
subdivision in San Jose, developed in 1902, was the first modern subdivision in the
Valley. Sidewalks, sewers and utilities were already in place waiting for the homebuyer.
La Paloma Terrace was the first subdivision in Saratoga that followed that model.
The La Paloma Terrace subdivision retains much of its original character. The
subdivision was originally small with 35 lots. One lot was soon sacrificed to create
Lutheria Way in 1924. Although a number of houses were built or rebuilt after World War
II, the essential style of the early architecture is typical of the bungalows and
Mediterranean -style houses that were popular around World War I. Several of the houses
have had additions, but the setbacks have been respected and the additions are not overly
intrusive. In general, the homes below the crest of the hill, closer to Saratoga Avenue,
show more modification. Homes along the remaining two- thirds of the street, toward Oak
Place and Lutheria Way, retain their early style and character.
HISTORY OF THE RESIDENCE
The subject property was built in 1924 according to available records. Early property
records describe it as Lot 5 in La Paloma Terrace (today it is numbered as lot 12 as
early homes in Saratoga did not carry street addresses until well after 1950). La Paloma
Terrace appears in an early newspaper advertisement listing John Rodoni as the
builder /contractor. The house illustrated in the ad was owned by Mr. Ed Hooker, a
plumbing contractor; the Hooker home is directly across the street from the subject
property. Although it is generally known that Mr. Rodoni built a substantial number of
homes and businesses in Saratoga, including the Hogg Building and the Saratoga National
Bank, there are currently no available records that show him as the builder of the
subject property. (Sawyer:1922)
The subject property has had a number of residents over the last twenty years. Before
that time, there were just a few owners. The residents of the longest duration appear to
be James and Ann McCoy, who occupied the house for nearly 35 years, from about 1946 until
1980. Mr. McCoy died in 1960 and his widow remained at this address until 1980. The
house then passed to her niece and nephew, Marian Floyd and Thomas Floyd who sold the
property in 1983.
SIGNIFICANCE
This house on La Paloma is architecturally significant on a local level. It is a
distinctive example of Mediterranean Style design, including both its form and detailing.
The low proportions, tile roof, arched picture window, tile attic vent, and clinker brick
chimney are character - defining features. The style is fairly common in Saratoga, and the
house is compatible with its surrounding neighborhood that includes bungalows as well as
other early twentieth- century styles. The interiors have not been altered to a great
extent, and the majority of the house retains its integrity. The house appears eligible
for the California Register according to Criterion 3, architectural significance, on a
local level, and appears eligible for the Saratoga Heritage Resource Inventory under
criterion c. Although distinctive, it does not appear eligible for the National Register.
DPR 523L (1/95)
Page 6 of 11 Resource Name or #(Assigned by Recorder) 20288 La Paloma Street
Recorded By: L. Dill /A. Halberstadt Date: July 21, 2003 x Continuation _ Update
The people associated with the house did not make a contribution to the history of their
community in such a way that would make the house significant historically based on their
association. The La Paloma property is not associated with any significant events or
patterns of historical development. Therefore, the property would not be additionally
eligible for the National or California Registers based on its association with
personages or events or patterns, Criteria A, B and 1, 2, respectively, and local
significance is limited to its architectural value.
(Section B12, References, continued from pg. 2)
Baker, John
1994 American House Styles. New York: W. W. Norton & Company
Brainard, H. A. (Civil Engineer)
1888 Map of Saratoga
Census Records
United States Federal Census, 1920 and 1930
City Directories
1870 to 1968 City of San Jose. Saratoga residents appear in a separate listing
County of Santa Clara
Deeds and Official Records
Official Maps
Probate Records - Superior Court
Book of Wills
School Tax Assessment Records - 1930 to 1960
Great Register of Voters
Cunningham, Florence R.
1967 Saratoga's First Hundred Years. Fresno, California. Panorama West Publishing.
Garrod, R. V. Saratoga Story. Published by the author, Saratoga California.
MAPS The following Official Maps in the Santa Clara County recorder's office
Mary Parker Homestead (August 1897) - Book F1 of Maps Page 11
Park Place (8- 17 -14) amended - Book 0 of Maps: Page 58
Oak Alley (8- 16 -16) - Book P of Maps: Page 3
La Paloma Terrace (8 -2 -15) Book 0 of Maps: Page 81
Lutheria Way (12- 23 -25) Book U of Maps: Page 31
Sawyer, Eugene T.
1922 History of Santa Clara County. Historic Record Company, Los Angeles.
Thompson and West
1876 Atlas of Santa Clara County. Reprinted by Smith & McKay, 1976
DPR 523L (1/95)
Page 7 of 11 Resource Name or #(Assigned by Recorder) 20288 La Paloma Street
Recorded By: L. Dill /A. Halberstadt Date: July 21, 2003 x Continuation _ Update
i FkhAWltomTDROIOMWW & ew ¢Pmdadkwtrvww.tapo.cama
Page 8 of 11 Resource Name or #(Assigned by Recorder) 20288 La Paloma Street
Recorded By: L. Dill /A. Halberstadt Date: July 21, 2003 x Continuation _ Update
Detail of Front Entrance, from northeast;
photo by L. Dill, July 2003.
Detail of Front Fagade Buttress, from northeast;
photo by L. Dill, July 2003.
DPR 523L (1/95)
I
Page 9 of 11 Resource Name or# (Assigned by Recorder) 20288 La Paloma Street
Recorded By: L. Dill /A. Halberstadt Date: July 21, 2003 x Continuation _ Update
DPR 523L (1/95)
Northwest Side of House, from west;
photo by L. Dill, July 2003
Northwest Side of House, from north;
photo by L. Dill, July 2003
Page 10
of
11
Resource Name or# (Assigned by Recorder)
20288 La Paloma street
Recorded By:
L.
Dill /A.
Halberstadt Date: July 21,
2003 x Continuation Update
Garage Addition, from northeast;
photo by L. Dill, July 2003.
Rear of House, from southwest;
photo by L. Dill, July 2003.
DPR 523L (1/95)
Page 11
of
11
Resource Name or# (Assigned byRecordeo
20288
La Paloma Street
Recorded By:
L.
Dill /A.
Halberstadt Date: July 21,
2003
x Continuation _ Update
Detail of Southeast Side Porch Roof, from west;
photo by L. Dill, July 2003.
DPR 523L (1/95)
FRONT PERSPECTIVE
27-09
-669.,
2'-W. 1
- 34.6
0 -314. 6'- W
0 -314' . 5'-:
- 2.4 sq.ft.
- 1 .6 sq.ft
2'4' . 5'1JY
9' -714' . 14'.
- 1 1.8 5q.ft.
- 137.6 x
36' -6'. 9'-1 r14'
1'- 0'.6'4'
- 362.1 5q.ft.
= 6.3 q.ft
I I' -r. 13'
23' -214' a 124'
V
good inghb- fence
03'. I1'T
- 151.5 aq.ic.
LOT 5 f`
LA PALOMA TERRACE
- 266.2 >q.ft.
SUBDIVISION '0781
BDIVISION '0781
- 2.9 sq.ft.
FILICE
APN 397- 23 -04G
N 397 - 23 - O I
DOC #14469284
VILA,
OC #1545908ODELED
-aide ae[badr
2' -Sys' x 16' -I IY[
'V 314'
47.6
HOU5E
th
27 3i4• . 13'4'
Y
rod (W fo.4 -t
to be demoldied
- 41.7 sq.ft.
37 sq.ft.
tD
176.6 sq.ft.
- 363.9 sq.R.
IP
- 111 4' . 12-4
further site ,fonrabm
o
136.6
i - -
_
sq.ft.
PLAN
P
SUBDIVISION '0781
5CALE: I" = 10' - 0'
O
V-5'. 14'-0•
51--i
O
+ 34.6 5.1A.
- 151.5 5q.ft..
O
DOC #15274549
- 19.6 5q.ft.
6' high, r-d-.
+ 266.2 sq.ft.
a
u
i ONE- 5TORY'
+ 363.9 iq.ft.
..RESIDENCE
4' -I IV. 1'2'
+ 19.6 aq.ft.
+ 5.8 5.1 ft.
;
- 5.6 sq.ft.
+ 2.4 sq.ft.
+ 1 1.6 sq.ft.
FIR5T FLOOR
+ 362.1 q s.ft.
+ 2.5 q'
SECOND FLOOR
+ 21 1.6 q* It
+ 176.6 sq *fE
+ 1366 R
_
-'
= 1.800.2 sq.ft.
FLOOR AREA
CAL CULATIONS
5CALE: XG = I' - O"
VICINITY MAP
NO 5CALE
51TE
GREENLEAF
APN 397 - 23-004
(W d high, wooden .
good neighbor fence
(N43'28'00 "W 50 0')
3 R (e) Overhead
4 a ^ be
rx,nee dac d to
_ § n anoani
n m
0
(e) 6' high, wooden,
W light weo.
good inghb- fence
t
LOT 6
LOT 5 f`
LA PALOMA TERRACE
PALOMA TERRAG
SUBDIVISION '0781
BDIVISION '0781
MA50N
FILICE
APN 397- 23 -04G
N 397 - 23 - O I
DOC #14469284
VILA,
OC #1545908ODELED
-aide ae[badr
STORY
. aq. .
+ 56.0 5q.ft.
- U779.3 sq.ft.
iieyhbw's dwe tree - to
be protected » pis t-
adieduk m .ah-t5
(S43 °00'00 "E 50.00')
Ci0
W light weo.
(NW curb art to be
- 15' -CW. 14' -1'
Zoned:
1
- 21 1 .6 5q.ft.
• 1 I'1Taemnd
water
O
-
xQY srd: setback
ONE-5TOKY
c
"6'O tint story
Second Floor:
GUE5T
-aide ae[badr
J1
Total Floor Aro':
HOU5E
th
- 11,_11••
to
rod (W fo.4 -t
to be demoldied
14• -10' -
37 sq.ft.
tD
176.6 sq.ft.
•
3
- 111 4' . 12-4
further site ,fonrabm
o
136.6
i - -
_
sq.ft.
PLAN
P
SUBDIVISION '0781
5CALE: I" = 10' - 0'
O
- I(7-9V. 5'4✓a'
51--i
O
- 56.0 5q.ft.
•
O
DOC #15274549
6' high, r-d-.
EX15TING
a
1.6 aq.ft.
i ONE- 5TORY'
+ 137.6 aq.ft.
..RESIDENCE
+ 6.3 sq.ft.
;
+ 151.5 sq.ft.
+ 47.6 aq.ft
+ 151.5 q.1t.
+ 21 1.6 q* It
+ 176.6 sq *fE
+ 1366 R
_
-'
. aq. .
+ 56.0 5q.ft.
- U779.3 sq.ft.
iieyhbw's dwe tree - to
be protected » pis t-
adieduk m .ah-t5
(S43 °00'00 "E 50.00')
Ci0
I I •�' xcad
afory aide eetback
fins story
side setback
.1681 acres 7,321 51.ft.
(NW curb art to be
€
Zoned:
1
Average site slope:
EX15TING
water
O
-
EX15TING
ONE-5TOKY
c
ONE -STORY
Second Floor:
GUE5T
RE51DENCE
J1
Total Floor Aro':
HOU5E
)
(e1 drne
to
rod (W fo.4 -t
to be demoldied
� t
37 sq.ft.
Driveway:
see brad -prig pbn for
•
3
Building Footprint:
further site ,fonrabm
o
LOT 4
Maximum Allowabb Crn rage:
o
LA PALOMATERRACE
PLAN
P
SUBDIVISION '0781
5CALE: I" = 10' - 0'
ORIGINAL 5URVEY BY
HARWARD
51--i
DUNBAR AND CRAIG LAND 5URVEY5
APN 397 -23 -01 1
•
DOC #15274549
6' high, r-d-.
SW
good nnghb- f-
.t
exisbrq footpnM
to be --d
I I •�' xcad
afory aide eetback
fins story
side setback
trench gas, watt. serer.
rd stun dram down
miter d d--.W
'-fire hydnrR
.1681 acres 7,321 51.ft.
(NW curb art to be
€
Zoned:
1
Average site slope:
elrGiral bcao
I
water
O
11'17
EX15TING
Q - vngle story fodpnnt
c
ONE -STORY
Second Floor:
O- area f aecand hoar
RE51DENCE
J1
Total Floor Aro':
to mnnl f�
)
(e1 drne
to
rod (W fo.4 -t
to be demoldied
� t
37 sq.ft.
Driveway:
see brad -prig pbn for
=
486.23'
to 13'17
Building Footprint:
further site ,fonrabm
trench gas, watt. serer.
rd stun dram down
miter d d--.W
'-fire hydnrR
.1681 acres 7,321 51.ft.
(NW curb art to be
397-23-012
Zoned:
e ef-aw
Average site slope:
SnE RAN LEGEND:
water
O
11'17
Allowable floor area:
Q - vngle story fodpnnt
First Floor:
2,400 ".ft. + (3) x 160 sq.ft.
Second Floor:
O- area f aecand hoar
L A P A L O M A
A V E N U E (50')
Total Floor Aro':
to mnnl f�
Impervious Coverage ":
5urveyor: Dunbar and Craig, LL5
Patios, Walks, and Walls:
rod (W fo.4 -t
to be demoldied
O SDMtt rim
deatnn
37 sq.ft.
Driveway:
see brad -prig pbn for
=
486.23'
1,559 5q.ft.
Building Footprint:
further site ,fonrabm
Total Proposed Coverage:
3,659 5q.ft.
Maximum Allowabb Crn rage:
60% = 4,393 5q.ft.
PROPOSED SITE
PLAN
l
detailed breakdown
5CALE: I" = 10' - 0'
ORIGINAL 5URVEY BY
51--i
DUNBAR AND CRAIG LAND 5URVEY5
SITE DATA:
Lot 5ize:
.1681 acres 7,321 51.ft.
Assessors Parcel Number.
397-23-012
Zoned:
RI - 10,000
Average site slope:
5 = 3.4%
Age of structure:
circa 1924
Allowable floor area:
No reduction based on site slope
First Floor:
2,400 ".ft. + (3) x 160 sq.ft.
Second Floor:
= 2,880 5q.ft.
6n5tmq Buildniq:
Phone:
Conditioned:
1,557 5,3A.
Unconditioned
31 1 5q.ft.
Footpnnt:
1,898 sq.ft.
Proposed Buildmg:
Architect: Michael McKay
Basement:
789 sq.ft.
First Floor:
1,380 sq.ft.
Second Floor:
1,079 5q.ft.
Garage:
420 5q.ft.
Total Floor Aro':
2,879 sq.ft.
Impervious Coverage ":
5urveyor: Dunbar and Craig, LL5
Patios, Walks, and Walls:
1.286 51A.
Light Wells:
37 sq.ft.
Driveway:
536 5q.ft.
Total Impervious Coverage:
1,559 5q.ft.
Building Footprint:
1,800 5q.ft.
Total Proposed Coverage:
3,659 5q.ft.
Maximum Allowabb Crn rage:
60% = 4,393 5q.ft.
' Per City of Saratoga Definitions
W
F-�•i
•' See Impervious Coverage Calculations, 5heet 5, for more
detailed breakdown
SCOPE OF WORK:
The project entails the demolition/ remodel of a recent master bedroom
addition at the rear of the house, as well as a portion of the original
home. The front half of the original residence, including all portions of
the building with street frontage, are to rennin. Additionally, a second
story containing bedrooms will be added. And funny, a basement
addition, containing a recreational room, will be dug underneath the
revised first floor.
PROJECT NOTES:
For 5urvey information, refer to survey dated April 08, 2003, by
Dunbar and Craig Licensed land Surveyors.
. There are no major grading changes proposed for this project.
• There are rw major changes proposed in flow of drain water.
• There are minor changes proposed to the existing driveway, the (n)
garage will replace portions of the (e) driveway, and a bumpout will be
added.
. All utility services (electnol, gas, water, sewage, and telephone) arc
existing and shall be relocated or upgraded depending on the new,
loads imposed by this project.
. Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the LL5 of record shall
Provide a written certification that all building setbacks are per the
approved plans.
• The stucco retaining Walls in the front of the residence are not to
exceed 36' in height.
PROJECT TEAM:
Owner Michael Filice t Jennifer Jones
Phone:
(408) 61 5 -3483
20288 La Palom i Avenue
Drawn:
GC
Saratoga, Ca, 95070
COVER
Job:
Architect: Michael McKay
Phone:
(51 O) 527 -5998
801 Camellia 5treet,
Fax:
(5 1 O) 527 -5999
Suite E
a/
Berkeley, CA, 94710
O
5urveyor: Dunbar and Craig, LL5
Phone:
(408) 399 -6929
236 N. Santa Cruz Avenue,
5uite / 104
Los Gatos, CA, 95030
DRAWING INDEX:
1) Cover Sheet and Site Plan
2) FIr5t and Second Floor Plans
3) Basement Floor Plan and Sections
4) Elevatlon5
5) Landscaping Plan
6) A5 - 15uilt 51te Plan and Floor Plan
7) A5 -Built Elevatlon5
mckay • iarchitecture
801 Camelia Street
Suite E
Berkeley, CA 94710
Office: 510.527.5998
Fax: 510.527.5999
www.mckayarchitecture.com
Revisions I By
Preliminary Set
Design Review Set X
Plan Check Set
Construction Set -
Date:
V1
W
°
AS NOTED
Drawn:
GC
File:
COVER
Job:
FTLICEt JONES
O
I
of 7 sheets
U
O�1
a/
O
LO
l�
O
�
a
W
F-�•i
00
00
51--i
cV
Date:
2/25/2004
Scale:
AS NOTED
Drawn:
GC
File:
COVER
Job:
FTLICEt JONES
Sheet
I
of 7 sheets
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: Y1' = I' - a'
SGALC: Y4" = I' - U
gM NI
mckay • architecture
801 Camelia Street
Suite E
Berkeley, CA 94710
Office: 510.527.5998
Fax: 510.527.5999
www.mckayaichitecture.com
Preliminary Set
Design Fc cw Set X
Plan Check Set
Construction Set
Date:
2/152064
°
y ^ -1_6^
7W
GC
File:
PLAN -1,2
Job:
FILICE JONES
O
�
o
w
W
w
U
�
O
�
H
W
A
z
z
Q
�
o
�
W
a
00
00
O
N
Date:
2/152064
Scale:
y ^ -1_6^
Drawn:
GC
File:
PLAN -1,2
Job:
FILICE JONES
Sheet:
2
of 7 sheets
TRANSVERSE SECTION A
5CALE: Y4 = I' - Or
LONGITUDINAL SECTION B
5CALE: Y4 = I' - O'
BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN
5CALE: Ya' = I' - O"
o
11�
1" 1 T
mckay. orChitecture
801 Camelia Street
Suite E
Berkeley, CA 94710
Office: 510.527.5998
Fax: 510.527.5999
www.mckayarchitecturr.com
I Revisions I By
Preliminary Set
2252004
Design Review Set
j(
Plan Check Set
GC
Construction Set
PLAN - B
V 1
W�
ZO
t!1
O
0 W
W
O ~J 0
E f--t H
Q �
n �
^ W
z � �
w w �
w °
a
00
U O°
O
N
Date:
2252004
Scale:
y,^ = 1' -0"
Drawn:
GC
File:
PLAN - B
Job:
FILICFJJONES
Sheet:
3
of 7 sheets
(n) to tt. bie
w kty caA:ax
d W rod tAn
cam, to wbcy
vox rah W
st'rco aAOr a te.a,rc
/` AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 'A'A'A'A'A'A'A'A'AT
�AAAAAAAAAArAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA .�` .
3`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ��� - - - - y.;,^- ^,.,� ^ ^r.;A^
�/At�/AI/AI/AI/ All /Al/AIIAiAIAi /AI/At�A/AI/A1IA1Iii i�AAAAAAAA/
�� AAAAAAAAAAAAAA /� v /1AAAAAAAA/
AAAAAAAAAAAAi� � \AAAAAAAA/
AAAAAAAA/
��AAAAAAAAAA� �•- AAAAAA•
_r�%1AAA%It/OAr_. ���AAA/ItAAA �� ``AAAAAA/
all uposcd x'IM arN faxu
rood to be ataa � rood
I'
(c) sw co
� romam
to be r plar�d
r stained _.
W t. We
to 5,bty stress[
r (e) roof can
W stucco mrtura a
color to sway
ca^trax -th W
xocco nfor s rernne
,o,,,a,,, 4 to remain
prdde d roof
be%aH
(n) It— [court a color
to wbty carC w+Lh (e)
(N mme'ey car m (e)
1.--Y --I
_rood fbor
Ie eJ
a0 (e) painted - _
-
[o be replaud .
r,tamre rood
- f) �rracptta Gk to wbty
It r (e) roof td.,
r
(el arcn rs7^9 grade m mman
(n) sra'r to
FRONT (N0RTH`7'"A5T)
x
ELEVATION
me kay • architecture
5CALE: Ya' = I' - O'
ftm�
prohk
-
beyond
x
Plan Check Set
me kay • architecture
aY gutter, dormp_I.
ELEVATION
am Parapet Wan wzhmg
801 Camelia Street
o x r� wee copper
Suite E
Berkeley, CA 94710
W stuuo terturc a
o
4.
caor m wbty
Office: 510.527.5998
rrovax r,cn (d
stucco color t teaturc
Fax: 510.527.5999
O)
www. mckayarchi teeture.com
W te'racocta 1k
W wbty caves_
d (e) roof toes
H
W Ix T- Door mode
f bract pant of rutural yradc aysMig grade to remain
v adyr t to buld�q = pt c f '
diRerenrr from mesa Mght of
SIDff'"d"Mbl�TH -WEST) ELEVATION
5CALE: Ya' = I' - a'
R
REAR (SOUTH -WEST)
ELEVATION
5CALE: Y4' = I' - Cr
Preliminary Set
W
Design Review Set
x
Plan Check Set
O
Construction Set
ELEVATION
Job:
FILICE/JONES
O
4
of 7 sheets
o
4.
w
�
Qt
O)
O
H
W
�
z
w
�
w
�
�
A
�
A
Ij..�11
O
a
�00
�oo
5►-1
N
O
\ A A AAAAAA
'/iI-AAAAAAAAAAAAA/
Il1�AAAAAAAAAA
AA/
•AAAAAAA
•AAAAAA/
►��
/� ��
%1A%1%�AAAA
AAAAAAAA
AAAAAA/
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
1/t �A/ l/
1 /\/�AA/IAA/IA/I/IIII/�A/IA/1/11
�.•AA
I�%ItAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/
/aAA
/1AAAAAAA
AAAAAA•AAAAA/
(AAAAA/
• AA
•AAA1 AAA
•AA i�
�
i
�
�`
AAAAAA
AAAAAAAA
^AdAAAAA
A A
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
.
i
'��AAA
.���AAAA
��AAAAA
/��AAAA/
'/�a'i
``
AAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
A
..
*_
�
��
'1_��1��
.
AAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
/A11/A11A
_
i
�
-
^_� ^ ^_ ^ ^�
�
�
••
/IAA/11!1/11/1A
lAl! 1AAAAA/
11AAAAA
/!t/1AA/111!1/1AAAAAA/t1AA_-
�f
r�
ii
_�
-
1(1`11I1111I111I1(1I11(11(
II1[1111[11I11111I1`11[1}1(
�A
_ MAAAAA/
AAAAAi
�
IIIII111IS1111I1I111I1i11[Ijlj
i
_.i:iAAAAA
AAAAAAA
a
_` T
`/I �
®
5 1 1
_ 1111
1 1
1 111[] IIIilililliliIlll[
1 11111111
IIiIiIililillllllllllllllllllllfllllliiS
—
11
\q^^.
AAAAAAAAAA/
AAAA�nAA
in
.-
AAAAAA�AAAAAA� AAAAAA..AAAAAg�-
.AAAA
AA/A�!t -
'A AAA• - -
AA�- AAAAAA�AAAAA...-
-� A
IIAAA/a1'A%AAA
AAAAAAAAAAA
rAAAAiA
� A
^`'^
•
i/ �1' -
AA %AAA:�AAAA%AA'IAAAAAAA
AAA'
AAAA
A A
AAAAAAAAAA AA- AAAA
AAAAAA�-AAAAAA__
AAAAAA.-
A�AAAAAAA�AAAA.-
AA
AAAAA�
A AAA/ll
A�-
AAAAAA-
A
A A
i� ��
�'
A
AA1!IsAAAJ1AAAAAAAA/AAAA�IAAAiAA.A�
•A I!1� A -
A�
.-
s�'/
1:
AAnAAAAAAAAA
A�AAAAAAAAAAA:-
AAAAAAr-
AAA
AAAAAA-
A
J:
X
L
r
_
t
I
I,
I ;I
1I1(1(1l111
1l1j1i1i1j1
I-��rl:;
�
�
1.1
►•�
!J
1IjI1Ijjj1j1(II1l
rj�j�jlllylyl
{{111/1++1111
++1jjj1ljj1i++1j
++1
_ill_
i_,
—,—
{lyljljl`lyl
Fm
f bract pant of rutural yradc aysMig grade to remain
v adyr t to buld�q = pt c f '
diRerenrr from mesa Mght of
SIDff'"d"Mbl�TH -WEST) ELEVATION
5CALE: Ya' = I' - a'
R
REAR (SOUTH -WEST)
ELEVATION
5CALE: Y4' = I' - Cr
Preliminary Set
W
Design Review Set
x
Plan Check Set
O
Construction Set
ELEVATION
Date:
W
O
y,^
Drawn:
O
File:
ELEVATION
Job:
FILICE/JONES
O
4
of 7 sheets
o
4.
w
�
Qt
O)
O
H
W
�
z
w
�
w
�
�
A
�
F i
Ij..�11
O
a
�00
�oo
5►-1
N
O
Date:
2252004
Scale:
y,^
Drawn:
GC
File:
ELEVATION
Job:
FILICE/JONES
Sheet:
4
of 7 sheets
DRAINAGE NOTES:
5torm water from first floor roof areas, to drain to rock -fdvd energy
dnssapaterst drywell in front landscape.
• 5torm water from the second floor and area drains in rear patio to drain
through tght lines to through -curb drain at front of property.
• 5tormwatcr from area drain in Ight well, from sump ptmlp in basement
cravdspace, and from foundation perimeter drain are to drain through
tght drain Imes to through -curb drain.
• Explanation of damage strategy: Because of site coaguraton and
topography, only a small percentage of drain water can be retained on
site. The site 5Lopes sightly from back to front, making the rear yard
unavailable for the drsctarge of rain water. The side yards are very
narrow, and will have impervious Paths covarmg a good percentage of
thew surface areas. Furthermore, the side yards border neghbors
yards and our own Proposed basement, ma6rtg retention of storm
water threre a legal hamrd and buidmg wretruction problem. Finally,
the front yard is lower than the house, arid will be used for storm water
cl —h.rge and retention. However, this yard 6 only ±325 square fed
in area, limiting the total amount of water which it can absorb.
RENOVATED LANDSCAPE WALLS AT FRONT
LANDSCAPE NOT
• Most of the Undscapug in the front, rear, and sides of the residence
wall be rebuilt and planted a5 part of this pro,)cct and will be designed
to comply with Article 15 -47 Water Efficient Landscapes' of the
5aratoga Mums pal Code.
• (E) Tree sacs and species on the architectural plans differ from those
shown on the surveyor. Architectural plans reflect the irchitet's
meassuremrnts and field obser tons.
• A landscape designer will make all final plant selections.
®TREE 5CHE DU LE:
I
r
5'. 2**
range (time 5--)
Japanese green maple (ACn- PA —)
To be removed
_-
I
C
Maytens (Maytenvs 50ann7
- --
I
3
Grapdr,4 (CArvs Parade)
50.6 sq.lt.
1
T. 6'. 4yz'
Saucer Magnoia (Magnob sniarigw)
To be rerixaed'
I
9'
Japanese gree maple (Ar PakvtwW
- -
I
4'. 4'
Japanese red maple (A Nk —tun)
I
4'. 4'. 4'. 4' Japanese gree maple (Ater Pal not m)
To be removed'
(n) I
34;'b-
5trawhery Tree (Arbvtvs Mama)
ew tree'
(n) I
24' bo,
5trawt —y Tree (Arbube Noma)
ew tree'
(n) G
TBD
5oecnn9 tree (to be defamed)
new tie
(n) I
TBD
5--3 tree (to be det —ed)
new tree
N per the City Arboret Report, dated Jan. 23. 2004. by Dated L Babb,. RCA:
the removal d trees'E' J G' requre -t qa wig meavrev. The new tree planted
(J - M) shau bc, at the sbsoWte mmmun, equmlent to a total d a) one 3G bar aid
one 24' law vie OR b) four trees of 24' boa eats. The tree filf" the —Vii e t
mdude Coast We Oak, Valley Oak Black Oak Blue Oak Scrub Oak- Bg Leaf M*4c.
CA(— Buckeye. Dagbs rv. or a Cant Red w.. d. In the propovl, tree J and R
Mfill the ar,O 's requwemet for s and arc Cakfemu names, but do not appr
a the City Arboret's Report wdh regard to specie.
the (e) shrubs below tree 'M shall be retained thrm4ha2 the antra construGm
and land —png proses. All development actmt rivst be rudidcd to tic
northwest vde d then: shrubs.
IMPERVIOUS
COVERAGE CALCULATIONS:
dnrveway (Pavers):
53GA sq.ft.
retaining walls (stucco R concrete):
70.1 sq.ft.
front walks (concrete):
188.8 sq.ft.
side walk - north (concrete):
149-0 sq.ft.
side walk - south (concrete):
200.6 5,1A.
side Pat* (concrete):
50.6 sq.lt.
light well (concrete):
37.3 sq.ft.
rear patid seat walls (concrete):
605.2 sq.ft.
bbq area (concrete):
20.6 5g.ft.
total impervious coverage:
1,558.G sq.ft.
(e) Nthlghbig
be sd-" by
ow•ier
W curate steps height of walla to be
bi, m [o r—ri 3' higher than (e)
railroad timber walla
(el &-a bgh weed -
good neighbor Fe—
area drain to ,treat
(e) 6-0' high aa—der
good neghbor fame
(e) dr —y to be
-de-4 at coddle.
drneway to be
CalItone concrct
7 pa•'en
(T—n Gold Oiurry
Rock) set m basaack.
(536.4 5q.ft.)
low piing beds -
sprra to be
determined by
Iwdscape de .S-
Criwated resavn,g wails -
f
) railroad trees to be,
placed by ete
covered stucco walla
k ro poiii[ are twos to
eacced 31' n height
411) LANDSCAPING PLAN
SCALE: Ye' = I' - O' =---
mckay • architecture
801 Camelia Street
Suite E
Berkeley, CA 94710
Office: 510.527.5998
Fax: 510.527.5999
www.mckayarchitecture.com
Revisions I Rv
Preliminary Set
V1
Design Review Set
X
Plan Check Set
O
Construction Set
1
Date:
V1
°
AS NOTED
7W
O
File:
1
Job:
FILICEIJONES
O
Cli
o
U
'
F�
1–•i
7
W
�
z
wW
�
a
W
00
00
V
O
N
Date:
2252004
Scale:
AS NOTED
Drawn:
GC
File:
LANDSCAPING
Job:
FILICEIJONES
Sheet:
S
of 7 sheets
63'- IJq of (c) ongmal
.raas w x remo.ed
—
artenor v05 ro
in (all from
ongmal base)
FMTII
❑ 1
DEMOLITION PLAN
SCALE: Ye' = I' - O'
�_I
love ones drrore
( 58• -s• of (d aaeror
..,a, � x remoree
(46' -9' of rhrJ� arc
fran orqueal house)
EXTERIOR WALL
DEMOLITION
CALCULATION5:
HL t.ncal RL5.den .
2252004
(e) exterior walls:
152'-5"
dem 1,5hed walls:
GC
Percent dem fi'hed:
41.3%
Current Re Omce:
FILICFIJONES
(e) exterior walls:
24&-CO�•
demolished walls:
156-5'
Percent demolished:
63.996
AS -BUILT SITE PLAN
SCAM: X6" = I' - O" SURVEY BY DUNBAR AND CRAIG LAND SURVEYS
AS -BUILT PLAN
SCALE: Y," = I ' - 9
emu,.
1` YT
mckay• architecture
801 Camelia Street
Suite E
Berkeley, CA 94710
Office: 510.527.5998
Fax: 510.527.5999
www.mckayarch itecture.com
Preliminary Set
Design Review Set X
Plan Check Set
Construction Set
Date:
2252004
Scale:
AS NOTED
Drawn:
GC
File:
ASBUILT
Job:
FILICFIJONES
Sheet:
6
of 7 sheets
O
w
W
w
U
�
o
�
H
Q
W
�
�
Q
w
�
z
w
�
W
�
�
w
0c
U
°°
N
Date:
2252004
Scale:
AS NOTED
Drawn:
GC
File:
ASBUILT
Job:
FILICFIJONES
Sheet:
6
of 7 sheets
E
E
Non- histonc addition
J to be demohshed
Portions of cxtsGng
histonc house to be
preserved
1
❑❑❑❑❑❑
0
Portions of existing
histonc house to be
FRONT (NORTH -EAST) AS -BUILT ELEVATION preserved
5CALE: Y; = I' - O'
SIDE (NORTH -WEST) AS -BUILT ELEVATION
5CALE; Y<' = I' - O• a �.
REAR (SOUTH -WEST) AS -BUILT ELEVATION
5CALE; Y; = 1' - Or &• '
Non - historic addition Portions of existing
to be demolished historic house to be
preserved
O
S
SIDE (SOUTH -EAST) AS -BUILT ELEVATION
5CALE: Y; = P - O' hrw
mckay. architecture
801 Camelia Street
Suite E
Berkeley, CA 94710
Office: 510.527.5998
Fax: 510.527.5999
www.mckayarchitecture.com
Revisions 1 By 1
Preliminary Set
v1
Design Review Set
X
Plan Check Set
O
Construction Set
r-�
Date:
v1
°
1/4"= V-O"
7W
O
File:
r-�
N
FILICE/JONES
Sheet:
7
of 7 shects
`O
r �
o
w
W
L=�1
C7
ZO
O
Q
W
ti
�
Q
W
�
z
w
�
W
o
i
o
OO
V
O
N
Date:
225/2004
Scale:
1/4"= V-O"
Dawn:
GC
File:
ASBUILT
Job:
FILICE/JONES
Sheet:
7
of 7 shects
L-1
1 I
ABBREVIATION
LEGEND
_ 1m
(D
103.56
°u7
9 �
104.4\ 1,01
105.1
GARAGE
FF 101.77
+102.76
+103.12
+103.
FD. 3!4' IP
N 45 °27' W 166.59'
100.67 �
100.40
--------------------------------- 10126 Ep 100.66
- EP 101.25
AC DRIVEWAY +
d ,
a70 -
101.44 q
NO1 GE
d?
T07
10,68 0 101.75 10222
101.0` e
"o. a' HOUSE
e (0.
to273 FF 104.2
102.46 + 02.56
03.�d
103.
d °
d 103 ?9
' - 103554
23 103.56 03.48
a.
10
103.71
+103.74 +103.63
S 44 °29' E 166.55'
100.1.53
Ep t�Ot B,�
102-
702.88
24' TREE
+ O
103.53
GE 103.29 EP-
104
+iO3.73 -T-
FO. 314• IP J .
FD. MON
MON
;25: '00.36 0.76
Lu
Ep'
3 +
0 t.%
N /
QW
M <
a =
Z
Ep 10335 +103.3 -O
t"
25' MON
FD. MON
'O MON
BENCHMARK
ASSUMED ELEVATION OF 100.00' AT THE TOP
OF 3/4' IRON PIPE AT PROPERTY LINE
BASIS OF BEARINGS
THE CENTERLINE OF ALOHA AVENUE
PER RECORDED PROPERTY DEED, WAS TAKEN
AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS SHOWN HEREIN.
1f
APR Q 1 ?004 �1
,�lVI Gr
NOTE,
THIS SURVEY WAS DONE BASED ON PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED
PROPERTY BOUNDARY AS EVIDENCED BY REFERENCED MARKERS
FOUND IN THE FIELD.
THIS MAP DOES NOT CHANGE ANY PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED
PROPERTY BOUNDARY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR SUCH.
N
1
LU
LLI
0 d O
Fr d a',
LLJ QO
r
Z
W L LJ
�0CD
�ELo
W
uj
Z
Z>U
Q � Q
W 0 �
U) Q w
� CD
r
a
Ca
G a
U �
C
IX a�>/
VL.I..
O D
^
ll
I _ v/
O
Date, MARCH 14, 2004
SM10: 1 • = 10'
Designed by RW
D.- by: RW
Sheet
TOPO
P.U.E.
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
P.S.S.E.
PRIVATE SANITARY EASEMENT
SS
SANITARY SEWER LINE
C
CONCRETE
SD
STORM DRAIN LINE
SAN
SIDEWALK
(E) & (N)
EXISTING d NEW
W
WATER LINE
\
C 6 G
CURB GUTTER
STREET LIGHT
\`
PVC
DI
PLWI NYL CHLORIDE
DONN INLET
Q PG &E
PG d E VAULT
FG
FINISH GRADE
\�
GF
FINISH
SH
m WV
WATER VALVE
FF
GE
FLOOR GRADE
EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION
®
CURB CATCH BASIN
EP
EDGEOF PAVEMENT
O SDMH
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
O SSMH
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
scale: 1' = I0,
0 5SCO
SANITARY SEWER CLEAN -0UT
0 i0
5 20
0
BENCHMARK
200 -
CONTOUR LINE
w-
SWALE FLOW DIRECTION
TREE WITH TRUNK SIZE SHOWN
CONCRETE
_ 1m
(D
103.56
°u7
9 �
104.4\ 1,01
105.1
GARAGE
FF 101.77
+102.76
+103.12
+103.
FD. 3!4' IP
N 45 °27' W 166.59'
100.67 �
100.40
--------------------------------- 10126 Ep 100.66
- EP 101.25
AC DRIVEWAY +
d ,
a70 -
101.44 q
NO1 GE
d?
T07
10,68 0 101.75 10222
101.0` e
"o. a' HOUSE
e (0.
to273 FF 104.2
102.46 + 02.56
03.�d
103.
d °
d 103 ?9
' - 103554
23 103.56 03.48
a.
10
103.71
+103.74 +103.63
S 44 °29' E 166.55'
100.1.53
Ep t�Ot B,�
102-
702.88
24' TREE
+ O
103.53
GE 103.29 EP-
104
+iO3.73 -T-
FO. 314• IP J .
FD. MON
MON
;25: '00.36 0.76
Lu
Ep'
3 +
0 t.%
N /
QW
M <
a =
Z
Ep 10335 +103.3 -O
t"
25' MON
FD. MON
'O MON
BENCHMARK
ASSUMED ELEVATION OF 100.00' AT THE TOP
OF 3/4' IRON PIPE AT PROPERTY LINE
BASIS OF BEARINGS
THE CENTERLINE OF ALOHA AVENUE
PER RECORDED PROPERTY DEED, WAS TAKEN
AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS SHOWN HEREIN.
1f
APR Q 1 ?004 �1
,�lVI Gr
NOTE,
THIS SURVEY WAS DONE BASED ON PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED
PROPERTY BOUNDARY AS EVIDENCED BY REFERENCED MARKERS
FOUND IN THE FIELD.
THIS MAP DOES NOT CHANGE ANY PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED
PROPERTY BOUNDARY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR SUCH.
N
1
LU
LLI
0 d O
Fr d a',
LLJ QO
r
Z
W L LJ
�0CD
�ELo
W
uj
Z
Z>U
Q � Q
W 0 �
U) Q w
� CD
r
a
Ca
G a
U �
C
IX a�>/
VL.I..
O D
^
ll
I _ v/
O
Date, MARCH 14, 2004
SM10: 1 • = 10'
Designed by RW
D.- by: RW
Sheet
TOPO
EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLAN
LEGEND
® INDICATES WALLS TO BE ADpm ,III
INDICATES WALLS TO BE REMOVED
INDICATES WALLS TO REMAIN
- TORA6E
'1
DINE TE
n
' i I'
� I
-T - - -i
i 1 LI` /ING
ENTRY
• 1 .� I
i1
,I
EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN
GENERAL NOTES
N1 OETNL> NG dtOF /Qtl R1 nC[ DRIl4!b> 51W1 VBPIFIm �T M COIbi01 — — -
M OOXM.LOTOR. OI>GL?Nl I. D[iW91 M RNI MO dR lGLV T—>IULL [t
EW!®t a RCG�.1gLD 4Vt ErtROILS PL
YGQ�Y >iNCle r.T[IJa OIL acGt�e IN M aWUMf, M CPrtR/.cTat pppR FlV ClIDIM WTH
M I'IO�CC >W1L XOtIK M CI9CL IiO pfdMBl OR 9bIM®L Q R>LPm FGIL PROFpI
♦D.L9THM. Nm IX M CA1[ >Il.�ll FRA'E[p WTH M YtlFIC IX LNOORNMtt.
NO C W1L5[ OR N.i[RATbX A' ObNX aR PLAH >HNLL >[ MApE W TXalf M /.FFwOrtD OdCOrt
FFp1 [WIH9L or R[cORD OR OOMICt. M pG>M >XNl XOf p[ RCroHIIIXL FOR YrH
OWM[9 aR N.TERATOIU MAR M OR IJR[® 4Pa1 p[TIffiI M OwlR Mm CONTRAOTOR
$Xt.LL COHPLY F>IH M R[a.1�1> Or LOGN. CCU1tt Np F[LERIL NIENOI[9 HAV Ns
iRl>DIOTOX. 9,F[r! 1lMOO> NA TKAWLI.O HLE M S7LE RE>Fpt>IdLltt OF M OONntKTOR.
IN PRP' IItl IV.L Ii9�J :!p IX 1XI> v1011K IT I> t0 VGI41 r M
O[1AILm RbAPBEIM a M >F[GIFIGN1r 1✓f® GOp> NID >iNmN[q TO V[RIK nNT M
ITOH9 FWXLRm FCR UY IX THd Wanc LQT OR [fG®M • LT[D R[GWRRNI9. C�Ot
�FPROYN. I> Rd1Rm FOR N1 NNRRIN. G101005.
IBDIOn`> SX41 TN<[ FR[GdOCE 02R M 3cN2 CX M ORI.•illH. WaC MO O[TNL> Not >N^Wl
caeTRxnoX >H.u. car.eRw To dwLNL Wxuc aX Fw.rcr.
Xpro Nm D[fNL> 5XN1 TM¢ FR,[LlDp1L[ PIER >eru.L NOTe. N0 TYFIGN. N7f[v
*NtlE pRNala> .+o >F[cRlc.noX> RPRGf[X! M FunsHm >Tw.L:,n.LC. rler oo XoT uow..i[
ON M COMR�GTOR>NALL FROND[ N1 MG.IR.IC> ICC>N[r iG FbiEOi
M STR.GTUR[ RRIN> CON>TI[1LTpN. [UCN LlN'I.LR> °..WLL INCIIA[ d.T NOi pE LMITm t0 pRKIW
� 1LTUM Fat LOAD a.! TO COH>TAKTWX ppnFllXr; ETD.
M CCNRl40TOM1 I> PElroldpL[ FOR N1 JOp dR (.CIOITILN W[TY OI FF+OFpa1r NO FECFL9
0.RIN> THE GaIR. OF M PRO.tcr, NOI JAi PINN> WJRKIM KM >. M COHiRK.Tat >XN.L
06•[IO N9 XOLD WMM[» M 001>N'JL pL Ov1+ER FROw NN' LI.b1LIiY. RCAL OR N.LEO®, IN
olReRI WTX FEWORwNYE ar nORK OII TU> FROFST. EYGEK Fpl LIMILItt TXROLON
cr Ie>u>eXCe a M cvFaa as ce>lerrn
PROJECT INFORMATION
- ------------------- - - - - -- 511- 10 -01a
ZONING_ ________ ___ __________ R -1 -15,000
LOT AREA ----------------
___11,811
EXISTING FIRST FLOOR 1,444
EXISTING SECOND FLOOR ------- _650
EXISTING 6ARA6E SPACE --------- 880
ALTERED 6ARA6E SPACE -4aa
GARAGE SPACE REMOVED -------- aq-t
TOTAL EXISTING SPACE ---------- 2,914
(N) ADDED SPACE -------- ----- 61a
OVERALL ADDED SPACE ---------- 221
TOTAL LIVING SPACE ------------ 3,195
TOTAL BLDG FOOTPRINT-- _ - -_ -- -2,545
IMPERVIUOS COVERAGE ----------- 4109
54.6%
HOUSE BUILT IN Ig41
SCOFE OF WORK
I. ADD ON TO (E) 2 STORY HOME
2. RELOCATE KITCHEN
3. ADD (N) BATH
4. ADD (N) FAMILY
5. PARTIALLY DEMOLISH DETACHED 6ARA6E
69.91'
1= -72.12' _
TEE FLAN -
I/5 11 _ 11 Ou
REVISIONS BY
7JOSE,
❑ ❑ u V
Q
4 ® N
® xo
❑
Dco
m
715 N. FIRST ST. ste. 34
z
a
a
8
z ..1
v
.7 Z
c E•-
tn ti
F�
W
7U
H
W
Q
~ O
a
W <a
i-i-1
a
Q o
a dN
DRAwN KBW
DATE 3/28/04
CHECKED
SCALEA5 5HOl'NN
SHEET
1
LEGEND
® INDICATES WALLS TO BE ADDED
INDICATES WALLS TO BE REMOVED
INDICATES WALLS TO REMAIN
PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN
1/,4"=l'-0"
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN
IN
SAN JOSE, CALIF.
Z
N
T0^-
CA O
Q � U
Q
z
¢ a
z ® a
¢ E
E3 a°
D
m
715 N. FIRST ST. stE. 34
zVI
6
d
5
8
Q
W
y
O
a
O
a
rW
7V
H
^W^
F�1 <
I�
O
¢
z Fii xo ¢
o
0
P =�
nRAwN KBY�
DATE 3/25/04
CHECKED
SCALEA5 5HOWN
SHEET
2
PROP05EM FRONT ELEVATION
PROPOSED RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
ADDITION
PROPOSED LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
1/4 " =1' -0"
(w HORIZ. 51DIN&
TO MATCH (E)
PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION
REVISIONS BY
SAN JOSE, CALH.
Z
}
z°J o
Z °-
V
vi ~ 1�
q � m
� U
z
a a e
z e a
Lz ® N
q B v°
h
9
715 N. FIRST ST. ste. 34
z
0
F
°7a
m
0
m
0
0
R
O
a
0.
W
U
z
W
Q`
'z
a Fil
ZO O C¢7
o �a
vi
DRAWN KBN
DATE /28/04
CHECKED
SCALEA5 SHOWN
SHEET
3
20
6051
EXISTING GARAGE FLOOR PLAN
1/4 " =1' -0"
LEGEND
® INDICATES WALLS TO BE ADDED
INDICATES WALLS TO BE REMOVED
INDICATES KALLr TO REMAIN
PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION
1/4 "=I _0
20'
PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR PLAN
1/4 "= I' -O"
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION
1/4" =1' -0"
PROP05ED RIGHT 51DE ELEVATION
1/4"=I' -O"
REVISIONS BY
SAN JOSE, CALIF.
5�Z'
N �
U ^
a
� a
z ® T
F
H
A
E13 M
m
715 N. FIRST ST. ste. 34
z
0
F
a
w
w
A
w
0
`o
s
a
w
u
z
w
s
o
uj
> J
a as
0 a�
z o�
0
Q o�
ILIN KBW
DATE 3/25/04
CHECKED
SCALERS SHOWN
SHEET'S
PROPOSED LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
1/4 "= I' -O" /l'J
I
.�
�-" [
�ztia, �GU� . \,
cAF= A'1'OCT ?. C�AILI C, 1A �;nC1; 0 Q f408� 8(;5 1200
lm ;wIx) -at ed (C:i obe- ` 1956
PROCEDURES FOR HISTORIC STRUCTURES
COUtit.' {1. MF,M{ "1FR�;:
Sign Eogosian
Kathleen Kino
Norman Kline
Nick St, eii
Ann N�-Itonsmith
The City of Saratoga requires all project applicants to provide information
regarding the age of the existing structure. If the structure is over 50 years old, it
may be historically significant. The City of Saratoga requires that the applicant
hire a Certified Historic Architect to review the history of the structure (see
attached list of Historic Architects) if the applicant is proposing any major.
modifications to the structure or is proposing it to be demolished. If a Certified
Historic Architect deems the structure significant, the proposed modifications or
demolition of the property would be subject to the California Environmental
Quality Act [CEQA]. CEQA states that an impact to an historic resource is an
impact to the environment.
CEQA Section 15331 allows the modification of the structure to be exempt from
the CEQA process if it meets the Secretary of Interior Standards for the
Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, sexempt on does notg
Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Properties.
include demolition.
CEQA Article 5 Section 15061. (3) Requires projects conduct.an environmental
study under the following general rule:
"The activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects,
which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment."
CEQA Section 15064.5 states what constitutes a historic resource. If The City of
Saratoga feels that there may be an historic resource it is the responsibility of the
applicant to hire a Historic Architect to determine historical significance of the
building and if required prepare an environmental study in conjunction with the
proposed alteration or demolition of the structure. Public agencies must treat any
such resource as significant unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates
it is not historically or culturally significant which can be demonstrated by a report
from a Certified Historic Architect.
The City of Saratoga's Municipal Code Section 13- 10.050 states that the City of
Saratoga's Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) is responsible for reviewing
1P
and commenting upon all applications for building, demolition, grading or tree
removal permits involving work to be performed upon or within a designated
historic landmark, heritage lane or historic district, and all applications for
tentative map approval, rezoning, building site approval, use permit, variance
approval, design review or other approval pertaining t or significantly
forwarded to the
any heritage resource. The Commission's comments
cation within thirty days after
City agency or department processing the app thirty.
days
the request.for such comments.
If the structure is over 50 years old it may require that the HPC review the
applicants proposal. The HPC me ets the second Tuesday of every month.
Applications are available at the City of Saratoga Planning Counter.. For further
information please contact the Heritage Preservation Commission's Staff Liaison
John Livingstone at 408.868.1231.
Other recommended resources are as follows:
State Office of Historic Preservation hhtp:Hohp.parks.ca.gov
Office of Historic Preservation
Page 1 of 2
Thursday, Oc
HP Workshop Materials
Publications and Forms
Staff Contacts
State Historical
Resources Commission
State Parks Home
Related Links
2003 Governor's Historic
Preservation Awards
Environmental Review
FCC/Wireless
Communication Facilities
Section 106 Review
Grants and Funding
Local Government
OHP Outreach in
Southern California
Preservation Incentives
Welcome to OHP
The Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) is the governmental agency primarily
responsible for the statewide administration of the historic preservation program
in California. The Mission of the Office of Historic Preservation and the State
Historical Resources Commission, in partnership with the people of California
and governmental agencies, is to preserve and enhance California's
irreplaceable historic heritage as a matter of public interest so that its vital legacy
of cultural, educational, recreational, aesthetic, economic, social, and
environmental benefits will be maintained and enriched for present and future
generations. More.About OHP..
REVISION OF NATIONAL REGISTER STATUS CODES ANNOUNCED
Dr. Mellon, State Historic Preservation Officer, announces the revision of the
National Register Status Codes effective immediately, and requests that the
California Historical Resource Status Codes be used henceforth in
documentation submitted to the OHP. The revised status codes reflect the
application of California Register and local criteria as well as the National
Register and will clarify the identification, evaluation, and understanding of the
significance of California's historic resources.
Announcement of Status Codes Revision (pdf -2pgs)
California Historical Resource Status Codes (pdf -1 pal
Preservation Partners
OHP OUTREACH IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
State & Federal To better serve the citizens of Southern California, OHP program specialists will
Registration Programs be available monthly, in Los Angeles, to meet with local government officials,
preservation leaders, public representatives, non - profit organization members,
Survey Program and private citizens interested in historic preservation issues, programs, or
activities.
BY PRIOR APPOINTMENT ONLY
WHEN: 2nd Thursday of the month, 10 am to 3 pm
WHERE: Junipero Serra Building
Room C, 1 st Floor
320 W. 4th Street (Corner of 4th & Broadway)
Los Angeles To Make An A ppointment or for More Information...
California Department of Parks and Recreation
Office of Historic Preservation
P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296 -0001
TEL: 916 - 653 -6624 1 FAX: 916- 653 -9824' calshpo@ohp.parks.ca.gov
riiip Many of the documents available on this web site are provided in
Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF)
and require the Acrobat Reader,
free software you may download to view and print these files.
FIVE VIEWS -1
SITE SURVEY
CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA h
LANDMARKS
STATEWIDE H
PRESERVATIC
2002 CULTUR/
RESOURCES:
PROCEEDING:.
NPS HISTORIC
PRESERVATIC
• The Secrete
Interior's Stani
Guidelines for
Historic Prope
• Archeolony
Preservation:
the Interior's S
Guidelines (an
• Federal His,
Preservation —T
• National Re
Bulletins
• Preservatio
ADVISORY CO
HISTORIC PRE
• ACHP Guid
Preservation F
•. Working Wi
California Hist,
Code:
State Historica
Code
Revisic
9/26/2003:
10/2/2003
CALIFORNIA>
HISTORICAL
RESOURCES
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
ALAMEDA
MARIN
SAN MATEO
Northwest Information Center
COLUSA
MENDOCINO
SANTA CLARA
Sonoma State University
CONTRA COSTA
MONTEREY
SANTA CRUZ
1303 Maurice Avenue
LAKE
NAPA
SOLANO
SONOMA
Rohnert Park, California 94928 -3609
SAN BENITO
SAN FRANCISCO
YOLO
Tel: 707.664.0880 • Fax: 707.664.0890
E -mail: nwicasonoma.edu
REFERRAL LIST FOR HISTORICAL RESOURCES CONSULTANTS
Amended May 2003
This is an alphabetically ordered list of individuals, firms and institutions which meet
minimum qualifications to perform identification, evaluation, registration and treatment
activities within the profession under which they are listed; incompliance with federal
and state environmental laws. It is only composed of individuals who have requested
listing by this Information Center and who have satisfactorily documented that they meet
the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for that profession. Inclusion in this list is
determined solely on this evaluation and not on review of current work. The last
category on this listing is comprised of individuals who were certified by the Register of
Professional Archaeologist and who were listed on this Information Center's referral List
as of May 1, 2003. These individuals may not meet the Secretary of the Interior's
Standards. This list has been prepared in accordance with guidelines stipulated by the
State. Inclusion on this list does not constitute endorsement of recommendations by the
State or the Information Center.
It is suggested that reports resulting from archaeological fieldwork be written in
conformance with "Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR):
Recommended Contents and format ", Preservation Planning Bulletin Number 4(a), or
appropriate federal standards. This bulletin may be requested through the Information
Center or the Office of Historic. Preservation.
The Information Center provides a copy of this list without charge when field inspection
is recommended or upon request. There is, however, a $10.00 fee for faxing the list.
Questions regarding the Referral List may directed to John Thomas; Staff Historian or
Jan Wooley, Staff Historian, Coordinators of the California Historical Resources
Information System, Office of Historic Preservation, at PHONE (916) 653 -6624 or FAX
(916) 653 -9824.
ARCHAEOLOGY
Anthropological Studies Center
Sonoma State University, Bldg. 29
1801 East Cotati Avenue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928 -3609
Phone (707) 664 -2381
Fax (707) 664 -4155
Adrian Praetzellis, Ph.D.
Erica Gibson, M.A.
Jack Meyer, M.A.
Mike Meyer, M.A.
Michael Newland, M.A.
Mary Praetzellis, M.A.
Sunshine Psota, M.A.
Suzanne Stewart, M.A.
Grace Ziesing, M.A.
email: asc @sonoma.edu
www.sonoma.edu/projects /asc
Applied Earthworks, Inc.
5090 North Fruit Avenue, Suite 101
Fresno, CA 93711 -3061
Phone (559) 229 -1856
Fax (559) 229 -2019
Barry Price, M.A.
Mary Clark, M.A.
Sandra Flint, M.A.
Wendy Nettles, M.A.
email: wmnettles @worldnet.att.net
Archaeological Assoc. of Central
California(AACC)
P. O. Box 310
Soquel, CA 95073
Phone (831) 479 -6294
Robert Edwards, M.A.
Archaeological Consulting
P.O. Box. 3377
Salinas, CA 93912
Phone (831) 422 -4912
Fax (831) 422 -4913
Gary S. Breschini, Ph.D.
Trudy Haversat, M.A.
Archaeological Consulting Services (ACS)
P. O. Box 39
Lytle Creek, CA 92358
Phone/Fax (909) 887 -0795
J. S. Alexandrowicz, M.S-
email: . alexarcheo@aol.com
ArchaeologicaUHistorical Consultants
609 Aileen Street
Oakland, CA 94609
Phone (510) 654 -8635
Suzanne Baker, M.A.
Applied EarthWorks, Inc.
Ananian Associates
3292 E. Florida Avenue, Suite A
1089 D Street
Hemet, CA 9544 -4941
Hayward, CA 94541
Phone (909) 766 -2000
Phone (510) 581 -7837
Fax (909) 766 -0020
Benjamin Ananian, M.A.
Susan K. Goldberg, M.A.
Anthropological/Archaeological Research
Melinda C. Home, M.A-
M. Colleen Hamilton, M.A.
Technologies(ART)
Joseph Nixon, M.A.
P.O. Box 381
Jill Onken, M.S.
Covelo, CA 95428
Mark C. Robinson, M.S.
Phone (707) 983 -6118
Scott A. Williams, M.A..
Fax (707) 938 -8004
Marilyn J. Wyss, M.A.
William Cull, M.A.
Anthropological Studies Center
Sonoma State University, Bldg. 29
1801 East Cotati Avenue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928 -3609
Phone (707) 664 -2381
Fax (707) 664 -4155
Adrian Praetzellis, Ph.D.
Erica Gibson, M.A.
Jack Meyer, M.A.
Mike Meyer, M.A.
Michael Newland, M.A.
Mary Praetzellis, M.A.
Sunshine Psota, M.A.
Suzanne Stewart, M.A.
Grace Ziesing, M.A.
email: asc @sonoma.edu
www.sonoma.edu/projects /asc
Applied Earthworks, Inc.
5090 North Fruit Avenue, Suite 101
Fresno, CA 93711 -3061
Phone (559) 229 -1856
Fax (559) 229 -2019
Barry Price, M.A.
Mary Clark, M.A.
Sandra Flint, M.A.
Wendy Nettles, M.A.
email: wmnettles @worldnet.att.net
Archaeological Assoc. of Central
California(AACC)
P. O. Box 310
Soquel, CA 95073
Phone (831) 479 -6294
Robert Edwards, M.A.
Archaeological Consulting
P.O. Box. 3377
Salinas, CA 93912
Phone (831) 422 -4912
Fax (831) 422 -4913
Gary S. Breschini, Ph.D.
Trudy Haversat, M.A.
Archaeological Consulting Services (ACS)
P. O. Box 39
Lytle Creek, CA 92358
Phone/Fax (909) 887 -0795
J. S. Alexandrowicz, M.S-
email: . alexarcheo@aol.com
ArchaeologicaUHistorical Consultants
609 Aileen Street
Oakland, CA 94609
Phone (510) 654 -8635
Suzanne Baker, M.A.
California State University, Stanislaus
Institute for Archaeological Research
801 W. Monte Vista Avenue
Turlock, CA 95382
Phone (209) 667 -3060
Fax (209) 667 -3324
L. Kyle Napton, Ph.D.
Cascade Research
668 Leonard Street
Ashland, OR 97520
Phone (541) 482 -5735
Dennis Gray, M.A.
C. A. Singer & Associates
P.O. Box 99
Cambria, Ca 93428 -0099
Phone (805) 927 -0455
Fax (805) 927 -0414
Clay A. Singer, M.A.
Center for Archaeological Research
California State University, Bakersfield
9001 Stockdale Highway
Donahoe Hall, Room BB 216
Bakersfield, CA 93311 -1099
Phone (661) 664 -2476
Fax (661) 665 -6909
Mark Q. Sutton, Ph.D., RPA
email: msutton @csub.edu
Robert Parr, M.S., RPA
email: rparr @csub.edu
Jill K. Gardner, M.A. RPA
email: jgardner4 @csub.edu
CH2M Hill
P.O. Box 428
Corvallis, OR 97339 -0428
Phone (541) 752 -4271
Direct (541) 758 -0235, Ext. 3662
Fax (541) 752 -0276
James C. Bard, Ph.D.
email: jbard @ch2m.com
CH2M Hill
P.O. Box 492478
Redding, CA 96049 -2478
Phone (530) 243 -5886, Ext. 3235
Fax: (530) 243 -1654
Alfred Farber, M.A.
email: afarber @ch2m.com
Cultural Resource Specialty
39 Parkside Court
Chico, CA 95928
Phone (530) 891 -8918
Furry, John, M.A.
Cultural Resources Unlimited
2614 Aramon Drive
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Phone (916) 363 -8774
Fax (916) 363 -5413
Eleanor H. Derr, M.A.
email: cru@Accessbee.com
David Chavez & Associates
P. 0. Box 52
Mill Valley, CA 94942
Phone (415) 388 -9037
David Chavez, M.A.
Davis -King & Associates
P.O. Box 10
Standard, CA 95373
Phone (209) 928 -3443
Fax (209) 928 -4174
Shelly Davis -King, M.A.
email: shellydk@mlode.com
Desmond, Lawrence G., Ph.D.
3097 Cowper Street
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Phone/Fax (650) 813 -1872
email: ldesmond @pacbell.net
Discovery Works, Inc.
Archaeological & Digital Design
P.O. Box 51476
Irvine, CA 92619
Phone (949) 733 -1915
Beth Padon, M.S.
email: bpadon @discoveryworks,com
Garcia & Associates
1 Saunders Avenue
San Anselmo, CA 94960 -1719
Phone (805) 569 -9116
Kevin (Lex) Palmer, M.A.
email: lexpalmer@home.com
www.garciaandassociates.com
Garcia & Associates
104 S. C Street, Suite G
Lompoc, CA 93436
Phone (805) 740 -1946
Fax (805) 740 -2046
Carole Denardo, M.A,
email: cdenardo @garciaandassociates.com
Garcia & Associates
1550 South Wells Avenue, Suite 104
Reno, Nevada 89502
Phone (775) 329 -1788
Fax (775) 233 -0129
Daniel Hart, M.A., RPA
email: danhart@garcia and associates.com
www.garciaandassociates.com
Garr, Nancy, M.A.
1640 Cromer Avenue
Colusa, CA 95932
Phone/Fax: (916) 458 -5338
Gibson's Archaeological Consulting
P. O. Box 102
Paso Robles, CA 93447 -0102
Phone (805) 238 -5411
Fax (805) 238 -7029
Robert Gibson, M.A.
Historic Resource Associates
2001 Sheffield Drive
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 -5905
Phone(916)941 -1864
Fax (916) 941 -9466
Dana Supernowicz, M.A.
email: historic.resource@attbi.com
W
Holman & Associates
3615 Folsom Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
Phone (415) 550 -7286
Fax (415) 282 -6239
Miley P. Holman, M.A.
Matthew R. Clark, M.A.
Lawrence G. Desmond, Ph.D.
Holman & Associates
1340 Kelly Avenue
Sebastopol, CA 95472
Phone/Fax (707) 823 -8388
David Bieling, M.A.
Holman & Associates
816 S. El Dorado Street
San Mateo, CA 94402
Phone/Fax (650) 347 -2572
Randy S. Wiberg, M.A.
email: rswent@aol.com
Hoover, Robert L., Ph.D.
1144 Buchon Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Phone (805) 544 -0176
Fax (805) 544 -2528
Huberland, Amy, M.A.
Consulting Archaeologist
P.O. Box 4788
Chico, CA 95927
Phone (530) 891 -8519
Fax (530)343 -0974
Hudlow Cultural Resource Associates
6312 Castlepoint Street
Bakersfield, CA 93313
Phone/Fax (805) 834 -9183
Scott M. Hudlow, M.A.
Laura Barrett Silsbee, M.A.
Hylkema, Mark G., M.A.
225 Eureka Court
Sunnyvale, CA 94085
Phone (408) 747 -5974
mhylk @parks.ca.gov
Morley, Susan, M.A., RPA
510 Carmel Avenue
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
Phone /Fax (831) 645 -9162
MRC Consulting, CRM
P.O. Box 652
El Granada, CA 94018 -0652
Phone/Fax (650) 726 -6269
Matthew Clark, M.A.
email: mrccrm@home.com
NCR Consulting
22242 Knolls Drive
Grass Valley, CA 95945
Phone/Fax (530) 268 -7345
Raymond Benson, M.A.,RPA
email: rbenson @lanset.com
Ogden Environmental & Energy Services
5510 Morehouse Drive, Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92121
Phone (619) 458 -9044
Fax (619) 458 -0943
Joyce M. Clevenger, M.A, RPA
Brian K. Glenn, M.A., RPA
Pacific Legacy, Inc.
1525 Seabright Avenue
Santa Cruz, CA 95062
Phone (831) 423 -0588
Fax (831) 423 -0587
Thomas L. Jackson, Ph.D.
Pacific Legacy, Inc..
1027 San Pablo Ave.
Albany, CA 94706
Phone (510) 524 -3991
Fax (510) 524 -4419
John Holson, M.A.
email: legacyjh@aol.com
Pacific Legacy, Inc.
3081 Alhambra Dr., Suite 208
Cameron Park, CA 95682
Phone (530) 677 -9713
Fax (530) 677 -9762
Robert Jackson, M.A.
Lisa Agler Shapiro, M.A..
William A. Shapiro, M.A.
PAR Environmental Services, Inc.
1906 21 st Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone (916) 739-835.6
Fax (916) 739 -0626
James G. Maniery, M.A.
Mary Maniery, M.A.
7
Parkman, E. Breck , M.A.
P.O. Box 890
Kenwood, CA 95452 -0890
Phone (707) 833 -2485
Parsons, Corp.
2233 Watt Avenue, Suite 330
Sacramento, CA 95825
Phone (916) 483 -0481
Fax (916) 483 - 3364
Kelly Heidecker, M.A.
email: kelly.heidecker @parson.com
Jody L. Brown, M.A.
Past Forward
5248 Carriage Drive
Richmond, CA 94803
Phone/Fax (510) 768 -9715
Rebecca Allen, Ph. D., RPA
email: pastforward@hotmail.com
R. Scott Baxter, M.A., RPA
email: prospectrol@hotmail.com
Roman F. Beck, M.A., RPA
email: romanbeck@hotmail.com
PAST - Pacific Archaeological Sciences Team
18034 Ventura Blvd., Suite 202
Encino, CA 91316
Toll -Free 1- 888 - 866 -PAST
Phone (818) 705 -33622
Fax (818) 881 -9133
Barbie S. Getchell, M.A.
email: past@earthlink.net
htt: //home.earthlink.net/—past/
Paul G. Chace & Associates
1823 Kenora Drive
Escondido, CA 92027
Phone (760) 743 -8609
Paul G. Chace, Ph.D.
email: pchace0qsdcoe.kl2.ca.us
Tremaine and Associates, Inc.
W. H. Bonner Associates
240 W. E. Street, Suite B
15619 Ogram Ave.
Dixon, CA 95620
Gardena, CA 90249 -4445
Phone (707) 678 -2330
Phone & Fax (310) 675 -2745
Fax (707) 471- 6502 -3922
W. H Bonner, M.A.
Kim J. Tremaine, Ph.C., RPA
email: whbonner@aol.com
email: ktremaine@tremainecnrs.com
William Self Associates, Inc.
TRC Alton Geoscience
P.O. Box 2192
2 1 A Technology Drive
Orinda, CA. 94563
Irvine, CA 92618
Phone (925) 253 -9070
Phone (949) 753 -0101
Fax (925) 254 -3553
Fax (949- 753 -011'1
William D. Self, M.A., RPA
Cell (505) 239 -0134
email: wself @williamselfassoc.com
Victoria Vargas, M.A.
James M. Allan, Ph.D., RPA
email: vvargas @tresolutions.com
Allen L. Estes, Ph.D.
Heather A. Price, Ph.D., RPA
URS Corp.
Kyle Brown, M.A.
500 12th Street, Suite 200
Jason A. Colemen, M.A.
Oakland, CA 94607 -4014
Leigh A. Martin, M.A.
Phone (510) 893 -3600
Kimberely S. Popetz, M.A.
Fax (510) 874 -3268
Nancy S. Summerlin, M.A.
Bryon Bass, Ph.D., RPA
Windmiller, Ric, Ph.C.
email: bryon bass @urscorp.com
P.O. Box 1358
Vance G. Bente, M.A.
Brian W. Hatoff, M.A.
Elk Grove, CA 95759 -1358
Sally Salzman Morgan, M.A.
Phone (916) 685 -9205
Fax (916) 685 -2342
URS Corp.
email: ricwm @delphi.com
1550 Humboldt Road, Suite 2
Chico, CA 95928 -9115
Phone (530) 893 -9675
ARCHITECTURE
Elena Nilsson, M.A.
Architectural Resources Group,
URS Corp.
Architects, Planners & Conservators, Inc.
221 Main Street, Suite 600
Pier 9, The Embarcadero
San Francisco, CA 94105 -1917
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone (415) 243 -3807
Phone (415) 421 -1680
Kathleen L. Hull, M.A.
Fax(415)421-0127
Stephen J. Farneth, FAIR,
Van Bu Thad, M.A.
email: cru@accessbee.com
P.O. Box x 3 32 26
Bruce D. Judd, FAIA
Westport, CA 95488
ems]: bruce@args£com
Phone (707) 964 -7560
Naomi Okun Miroglio
email: naomi@argsf.com
Varner Associates
P.O. Box 28214
Fresno, CA 93729 -8214
Phone (209) 487 -2765
Dudley M. Vamer, Ph.D.
9
Carey & Co. Inc.
Old Engine Co. No. 2
460 Bush Street
San Francisco, CA 94108
Phone (415) 773 -0773
Fax (415) 773 -1773
Nancy Goldenberg, M.A.
Joni Carroll, M.A.
email: engine2 @carey- sf.com
Clark Historic Resource Consultants
725 Monroe Street
Santa Rosa, CA 95404
Phone/Fax (707) 577 -8393
88 Sea Pine Reach
Sea Ranch, CA 95497
Phone/Fax (707) 785 -2725
Clark, Susan, M.A.
email: susanclark @alum.calberkeley.org
Design Aid Architects
6404 Hollywood Blvd., Suite 414
Hollywood, CA 90028 -6241
Phone (323) 9624585
Fax (323) 962 -8280
Jeffrey B. Samudio, M.C.
email: jbs @designaid.net
Dill Design Group
110 -C North Santa Cruz Avenue
Los Gatos, CA 95030
Phone (408) 354 -4015
Fax (408) 399 -4716
Leslie A. G. Dill, M.A.
email: ldill @ricochet.net
Amber Engle Grady, M.A.
Kara Mills Oosterhous, M.A.
Foothill Resources Ltd.
P.O. Box 2040
961 Pennsylvania Gulch Road
Murphys, CA 95247
Phone (209) 728 -1408
Fax (209) 728 -8542
Judith Marvin, B.A.
email: jmarvinfrl@aol.com
Garcia and Associates
1 Saunders Avenue
San Anselmo, CA 94960 -1719
Phone (415) 458 -5803
Fax (415) 458 -5829
Jennifer Hair, M.F.A.
email: jhair @garciaandassociates.com
www.garciaandassociates.com
Garcia and Associates
1 Saunders Avenue
San Anselmo, CA 94960 -1719
Kevin (Lex) Palmer, M.A.
Phone (805) 569 -9116
email: lexpalmer@home.com
Garcia & Associates
104 S. C Street, Suite G
Lompoc, CA 93436
Phone (805) 740 -1946
Fax (805) 740 -2046
Carole Denardo, M.A.
email: cdenardo @garciaandassociates.com
11
Greenwood and Associates
725 Jacon Way
Pacific Palisades, CA 90272
Phone/Fax (310) 454 -3091
Roberta Greenwood, R.P.A.
email: rsgreenwoo@aol.com
Gregory, Timothy P., M.A.
400 E. California Blvd., 43
Pasadena, CA 91106 -3763
Phone /Fax (626) 792 -7465
email: tirnpgregory@msn.com
Hardlines Design Company
4608 Indianola Avenue
Columbus, Ohio 43214
Phone (614) 784 -8733
Fax (614) 784 -9336
Mary E.Crowe, M.S.
Roy A. Hampton, M.A.
email: hlines@harlinesdesign.com
Harris, Dennis, Ph.D.
1879 Toyon Drive
Healdsburg, CA 95448
Phone (707) 433 -7464
Painter, Diana, J., Ph. D. Slawson, Dana N., M.A.
2685 A. Petaluma Boulevard, North 825 Washington Avenue, 44
Petaluma, CA 94952 Santa Monica, CA 90403
Phone (707) 658 -0184 Phone (310) 395 -3412
Fax (310) 454 -3091
email: d.painterl5 @attbi.com email: aroskar @bus.usc.edu
Parsons, Corp. Tom Origer & Associates
2233 Watt Avenue, Suite 330
ArchaeologicaVHistorical Research
Sacramento, Ca 952825
P.O. Box 1531
Phone (916) 483 -0481
Rohnert Park, CA 94927
Fax (916) 483 -33364
Phone (707) 792 -2797
Kelly Heidecker, M.A.
Fax (707) 792 -2798
email: kelly.heidecker @parson.com Vicki Beard, M.A.
Past Forward
5248 Carriage Drive
HISTORY
Richmond, CA 94803
Phone/Fax (510) 768 -9715
Rebecca Allen, Ph.D., RPA
Anthropological Studies Center
email: pastforward@home.com
Sonoma State University, Bldg. 29
1801 East Cotati Avenue
Paul G. Chace & Associates
Rohnert Park, CA 94928 -3609
1823 Kenora Drive
Phone (707) 664 -2381
Escondido, CA 92027
Fax (707) 664 -4155
Phone (760) 743 -8609
Mary Praetzellis, M.A.
Paul G. Chace, M.A.
Elaine -Maryse Solari, M.A., J.D.
email: pehace @sdeoe.kl2.ca.us
Will Spires, M.A.
Preservation Services Applied Earthworks, Inc.
P.O. Box 2650 3292 E. Florida Ave., Suite A
Carson, NV. 899702 -2650 Hemet, CA 925444941
Phone (916) 736 -1918 Phone (909) 766 -2000
Bonnie Snyder, M.S. Fax (909) 766 -0020
John Snyder, M.A. M. Colleen Hamilton, M.A.
Kevin B. Hallaran, M.A.
Roberts, Lois J., Ph.D.
24694 Upper Trail Archaeological Consulting Services
Carmel, CA 93923 P.O. Box 39,13826 Pollard Drive
Phone (831) 625 -5635 Lytle Creek, CA 92358
Fax (831) 625 -2406 Phone/Fax (909) 887 -0795
email: ljrobert@redshift.com J. S. Alexandrowicz, M.S.
email: alexarchaeo@aol.com
Seavey, Kent L., B.A.
310 Lighthouse Avenue Archaeological[Historical Consultants
Pacific Grove, CA 93950 609 Aileen Street
Phone (831) 375 -8789 Oakland, CA 94609
Phone (510) 654 -8635
Laurence Shoup, Ph.D.
13
Foothill Resources Ltd.
P.O. Box 2040
961 Pennsylvania Gulch Road
Murphys, CA 95247
Phone (209) 728 -1408
Fax (209) 728 -8542
Judith Marvin, B.A.
email: jmarvinfrl@aol.com
Cultural Resource Specialty
39 Parkside Court
Chico, CA 95928
Phone (530) 891 -8918
John Furry, M.A.
Garcia and Associates
405 Commercial Street
Nevada City, CA 95959
Phone (530) 470 -9236
Fax (530) 470 -9057
James W. Jenks, M.A., RPH
email: jjenks @garciaandassociates.com
web: www /garciaandassociates.com
Garcia and Associates
1 Saunders Avenue
San Anselmo, Ca 94960 -1719
Phone(805) 569 -9116
Kevin (Lex) Palmer. M.A.
email: lexpalmer@home.com
Phone (805) 569 -9116
Greenwood and Associates
725 Jacon Way
Pacific Palisades, CA 90272
Phone/Fax (310) 454 -3091
Roberta Greenwood, R.P.A.
email: rsgreenwoo@aol.com
Gregory, Timothy P., M.A.
400 E. California, 93
Pasadena, CA 91106 -3763
Phone/Fax (626) 792 -7465
email: timpgregory@msn.com
Hardlines Design Company
4608 Indianola Avenue
Columbus, Ohio 43214
Phone (614) 784 -8733
Fax (614) 784 -9336
Mary E. Crowe, M.S.
Roy A. Hampton, M.A.
email: blines@hardlinesdesign.com.
Harris, Dennis, Ph.D.
1879 Toyon Drive
Healdsburg, CA 95448
Phone (707) 433 -7464
Historic Resource Associates
2001 Sheffield Drive
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 -5905
Phone (916) 941 -1864
Dana Supernowicz, M.A.
email: historic@innercite.com
Hudlow Cultural Resource Associates
6312 Castlepoint Street
Bakersfield, CA 93313
Phone/Fax (805) 834 -9183
Scott M. Hudlow, M.A.
Hupman, Jan M., M.A.
P.O. Box 52
Mill Valley, CA 94941
Phone (415) 388 -9037
Fax.(415) 388 -3688
15
Jansen, Virginia L. Sager, B.A.
P.O. Box 726
penngrove, CA 94951 .
Jensen &Associates
P.O. Box 194
Durham, CA 95938 -0194
Phone (530) 345 -9515
Fax (530) 345 -0651
Peter M. Jensen, Ph.D.
email: plm2j3 @aol.com
Napoli, Donald, Ph.D
Roberts, Lois J., Ph.D.
Historic Preservation Planning
24694 Upper Trail
1614 26`s Street
Carmel, CA 93923
Sacramento, CA 95816
Phone (831) 625 -5635
Phone/Fax (916) 4554541
Fax (831) 625 -2406
email: dsnapoli @unlimited.net
Sales, Enid, B.A.
Owens, Kenneth, Ph.D.
3206 Serra Avenue
8421 Citadel Way
Carmel, CA 93923
Sacramento, CA 95826
Phone (831) 625 -0566
Phone (916) 383 -5178
Schmidt, Therese M., M.U.P.
PAR Environmental Service, Inc.
1033 Snug Harbor Street
1906 21st Street
Salinas, CA 93906
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone (831) 442 -1676
Phone (916) 739 -8356
Seavey, Kent L., B.A. .
Fax (916) 739 -0626
310 Lighthouse Avenue
Cindy Lou Baker, M.A.
Pacific Grove, CA 93950
Mary L. Maniery, M.A.
Phone (831) 375 -8739
Past Forward
Slawson, Dana N., M.A.
5248 Carnage Drive
825 Washington Ave. 44
Richmond, CA 94803
Santa Monica, CA 90403
Phone/Fax (510) 768 -9715
Phone (310) 395 -3412
Rebecca Allen, Ph.D., R.P.A
Fax (310) 454 -3091
email: pastfonvard @home.com
email: aroskar @bus.usc.edu
R. Scott Baxter, M.A., R.P.A.
email: prospectorI@hotmail.com
Taylor, Dan, M.A.
Paul G. Chace &Associates
400 East Commercial Street
1823 Kenora Drive
Willits, CA 95490
Escondido, CA 92027
Phone (707) 459 -2736
Phone (760) 743 -8609
Tom Origer &Associates
Paul G. Chace, M.A.
Archaeological/Historical Research
email: pchace @sdcoe.kl2.ca.us
P.O. Bex 1531
Peak & Associates, Inc.
Rohnert Park, CA 94927
3941 Park Drive, Suite 20 -329
Phone (707) 792 -2729
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
Fax (707) 792 -2798
Phone (916) 939 -2405
Vicki Beard, M.A.
Fax (916) 939 -2406
Ted Jones, M.A.
Melinda A. Peak, M.A.
Torpy, Sally, J., M.A.
Preservation Services
2020 University Park Drive
P.O. Box 2650
Sacramento, CA 95825
Carson City, NV. 89702 -2650
Phone (916) 4864407
Phone (916) 736 -1918
email: 72704.23@attbi.com
Bonnie Synder, M.S.
John Synder, M.A.
17
04
(-IDIIIIUSY� (09
13777 FRUITVALL AN'ENUE • SARATOGA. CALIFORNIA 95070 • (408) 868 -1200
Incorporated October 22, 1956
MEMORANDUM
TO: Thomas Sullivan, AICP, Community Development Director
FROM: Brad Lind, Building Official`
DATE: February 23, 2004
SUBJECT: Sam Cloud Hay and Feed Warehouse
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CC: Dave Anderson, City Manager
John Livingstone, AICP, Associate Planner / Staff Liaison to HPC
On February 11, 2004, I met with Mike Brozda (representing the Brozda family) to
discuss the historic Sam Cloud Feed and Warehouse building in Saratoga's Village.
Stan Bogosian
Kathleen King
Norman Kline
Nick Streit
Ann Waltonsmith
Last year, the City of Saratoga limited access to this building after an Engineer employed
by the Brozda family, conducted an investigation and determined the structure would be
susceptible to structural failure in the event of high winds or seismic activity. The
property owners (Joseph and Helen Brozda) were notified the City would require an in-
depth engineering analysis of the building to develop a repair /retrofit plan. This plan was
to be submitted to the City by March 1, 2004.
Originally, the Brozda's were given 90 days to prepare a retrofit plan and submit for a
Building Permit. This 90 -day time frame was at the suggestion of Assistant City
Attorney Wittwer. The Brozda's requested and were allowed an additional 60 days to
comply with the City's request.
Mike Brozda indicated his family has been considering various options with respect to
the repair /retrofit/rehabilitation of this historic building. These include:
1. Do Nothing
2. Stabilize barn to prevent further decay
3. Demolish barn and rebuild modern replica
4. Rehab existing structure
5. Sell or exchange barn
6. Develop vacant land next to barn (undeveloped parcel adjacent barn also under
Brozda ownership)
All of the above were discussed, with Mike Brozda identifying the pros and cons of each
option. Economics and financial returns for investment dollars seem to be the driving
factor of the Brozda considerations. Additionally, the building owners are elderly and
appear reluctant to take on such a project at this stage in life.
Mike Brozda requested the City allow their family to "hold off further development
consideration until December, 2004 ".
It is very apparent that something must be done to upgrade the structural integrity of this
historic building (or the structure should be demolished). As Saratoga's Building
Official, I'm very concerned with the potential for structural failure or collapse. Clearly,
this would cause serious problems for adjoining properties, primarily The Inn at Saratoga
Mike Brozda prepared a "power point" presentation that provides some history of the
building, and further discusses the family's options. A copy is attached. Please look this
information over, and then we can meet and determine our next step. I'm hoping that
John Livingstone can share this information at the March meeting of the HPC and get
their input on this matter.
Sam Cloud's Barn:
A Unique Part of Saratoga's
Past... and Future
Presented by:
Mike Brozda, Santa Cruz—pennymik@pacbell.net
Eric Brozda, Los Gatos ericbroz @ yahoo.corn
"The Sam Cloud barn is an important artifact from a wonderful
chapter in California history and deserves to be celebrated. "
April Halberstadt, Director, Saratoga History Museum &
Author of CLASSIC BARNS
Presentation Agenda
1. Historical background: Sam Cloud's Barn
2. Guiding principles for barn development
3. Examples of other local barns used in
retail /urban settings
4. Saratoga: Purchasing powerhouse of Silicon
Valley
5. Six different development options
6. Brozda Family background
7. Summary, Next steps and Adjourn
Sam Cloud: Saratoga Pioneer
• Cloud built barn, shop
and home on 4th and Big
Basin Way about 1880
• Cloud ran a General
Store (now occupied by
Harmonie Day Spa)
• Cloud, his wife and
daughter lived next door
(now Bella Saratoga
Restaurant)
• Barn behind 14501 &
14503 Big Basin Way
was work shop and feed
storage for horses
Cloud Store and Home, early 1900's.
Barn, not visible above, is at rear of
14501 Big Basin Way
Photo courtesy Saratoga Historical Museum
I I .. I I I
ky l
r.
r.
t
5 � �
�}�,6 `��F t � �-�� :.'�7 � 7+. a� +..!wwdr 'rc''�fy �o '� , 1..: � 1 e '3 v :i• I I � I
•s � �iF' � tip.. � � % 8 N x � a �� J..:.
r � ,,. :.;ya .5 Ps �,..sa.`• XA `':? .fsr'.. ,tom i'�;`F;� e,
rE r g 3 ir, 1 r t.
iT s ..ter` f i;
J i tr 3 a j
• �r r
,
X1
�
Nx
•
"r ='- �"�'-e-7��,��s ';. rx�.S$,��.- .rte —�_�R. °�,r ^y�'°.v.."','�• `?r - a"'z�..,x��-,y,,�. ----.'
. ^e�.�r'%.,�.�.�f+��{+si�'a``�w
The Cloud Property: Many Different
Uses Over the Last 125 Years
& Harmonie Day Spa
• Sam's Home and Store
were once...
— A General Store
— An Appliance Shop
— A Laundromat
— Saratoga News Offices
— Antiques Store
• The Barn was once...
— Stables & Feed Storage
— A Print Shop
— A TV Repair Shop
— Storage Warehouse
• � l .j. _ .�.: E. l 3�WT` ^S9SY'�'^°$V.Stic•.IA.
3 Sam.C�oud s Barn: =A Time 'Capsule frorn�,th ,'l8`C
µ �..
T7, r
a
• q'.•� %. S
1
• °y � t,�'�..I`�K.° ' -moo x'+ -
e ;,� t-. `- _ `-` ---tea s •,» -�..
– – � .. .•rte .,g'far` 15 _ _ - `� -.� !il.;" y � 1 rsTE•�' •�--^- y .1
�•:� �� - ��� y .may {" �z i "�'_ �" Y ,,�..
_� • � �---- Pte, T ,
"'"ate
pY roc `
r �
6 r� • .Ar _
r°
t
T^
o
dA
mi
w W
sa
caaa7�ac a
^•l !
aK• —� �, a 1. �L. - u _ � to- ��y. ! J _
.9{
-s•
4.
F i I
Ah
71
m
W0119111W
7�- 7
Side Entrance to Barn:
#2 Turkey Track Lane
arior of turn:
nund Floor
�C
;1P
75
J.
�C
;1P
Cloud Barn and Adjacent Buildings
Parcel 73
Is Vacant
hillside
lot next
to Barn
LARGE!
Bella
Saratoga'
#72
_ :________
' 01 7 A!
166 ... a /.. /.,./���.I, Q�IcJ ^ ^
!4S?/
!4525 523
SIN
---- --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - --
I I SAS
6 5'
C'
- so_g
CO '
6 63
op aD fay _�
so 1 so '
95 /44B.S�
^V�V�
C A- MAPS• PG.43
-------------------------------- - - - - --
Barn:
Parcel 71
City of
Saratoga
Parking
District #3
(partial)
Harmonie
Spa #70
Guiding Principles &Philosophy for
Development of Sam Cloud's Barn
• Preserve historic appearance and context of the
structure
• Conform to Secretary of Interior HUD standards
for rehab of historic structures
• Manage sensitive and sensible economic
development
• Enhance the barn as a unique asset to the city
of Saratoga
• Work cooperatively with city officials,
preservation groups and all interested parties
Facts: Sam Cloud Barn
• 3 stories, Extremely well -built structure
• Lot size: Approximately 2800 square feet
• Adjacent vacant hillside lot is 4000 sf
• 1700+ square feet/floor in Barn
• 5000 square feet total space
• Zoning: Commercial Historic District 1
(CH -1)
_J
Other Local Barns Used in
Urban /Retail Settings: Santa Cruz
• Salz Leather Tannery
Barn Complex, Sant
Cruz
— Built Circa 1860
— Today this barn
houses Michael
Angelo Art Gallery an
studios of 21 working
painters, sculptors,
ceramicists
Michael Angelo Gallery and Studios
Michael Angelo Barn Complex: A Mix of Old and New Structures,
plus Live/Work/Exhibit and Retail Art Sales Space
2003: New Live/Work
Space For Artists
Michael Angelo's Barn: A
Focus for Artists Living,
Working and Selling
- 2003: Second large barn
behind gallery converted to
live /work space for artists
- Michael Angelo barn
complex becoming a focus
for arts community in Santa
Cruz
• City of Santa Cruz plans
to develop 7 -acre Salz
tannery directly across
Highway 9 as major arts
center
.
.
.
Saratoga: The Purchasing
Powerhouse of Silicon Valley
Population: 29,843
Median age 43.2 years'
Projected population growth 1995 -2020:
23 %2
Projected income growth 1995 -2020: 42%
2000 Mean household income: $184,500
2020 mean household income: $241,200
(58% increase)
1:2000 Census
2: Growth Projections for Santa Clara County, ABAG "Projections 2000 "
Big Basin Way at 4t" Street: The
Heart of Saratoga Business
'Info from Doug Ferrari, Meacham Oppenheimer
Cloud Barn
Located
In the heart
Of
Saratoga's
Business
District
District 3
Parking
iratoga
.nts:
J sf'
Parking Near Cloud's Barn
• Part of S Parking District #3
• Formed in 1985
• 222 spaces
• Extends from Bella Saratoga to Highway 9
Where We are Today
• Prelim structural plans complete (Chien Lee
Engineering, San Jose)
— Need: Final structural drawings and city approval
• Architectural Drawings complete (Warren Heid,
Architect, Saratoga)
— Need: Final revisions to plans and city approval
• Barn vacant and cleaned out
• Potential proposed uses: offices, support space for the
Inn at Saratoga, Bella Saratoga and Harmonie Spa
• 1985: Plans put on hold due to $330,000 Assessment for
Parking District #3
Nearby Tenants' Space Needs
Harmonie: "I will gladly discuss with you
the possibility of leasing storage space
and perhaps office space if available."
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Which Development Option
Makes the Most Sense?
Do nothing?
Stabilize Barn to prevent further decay?
Demolish Barn and rebuild modern
replica?
Rehab existing structure?
Sell or exchange barn?
Develop vacant land next t
o barn?
Option #1: Do Nothing
• PROS:
— $0 investment cost
— Avoids damaging /destroying historical value
• CONS:
— Deterioration of structure
— Attractive nuisance
— $0 Return on Investment
Development Option #2:
Stabilize Barn Structure
• Cost: Depends on complexity ($20,000 to $50,000 +)
•
Process:
— Plywood shear walls on interior
— Structural tie -downs for foundation
— Paint exterior, replace broken windows
• PROS:
— Minimal investment prevents further deterioration
— Improved appearance
• CONS:
— $0 return on investment
— No improvement to retail /business climate in Saratoga
— Barn still unusable for any commercial purpose
— Difficult to obtain permission from city?
Development Option #3:
Demolish Barn
• Cost $50,000 to $100,000'
• Pros:
— Frees up land to re -build more space - efficient
modern, up -to -code structure
• Cons:
r.
— Permanent loss of major irreplaceable
historical asset
— Objections /delays from city and /or historical
groups
Estimate from Mark Hirth, Project Manager, Barry Swenson Builders
Development Option #3A:
Build a New Barn that Looks Original
• Cost: $125 per square foot for shell'
— Interior tenant improvements $30 /sf and up
—Deck on adjacent hillside property: $25 /sf
— Restaurant improvements: Up to $100 /sf
• PROS:
— Most cost - effective way to create an antique looking
structure
— Meets modern building codes
• CONS:
— Loss of original structure
— Resistance from city and /or historical preservationists
Rough estimates from Mark Hirth, Barry Swenson Builders
Option #4: Rehab Existing
Structure
• Cost: $1 million to $1.5 million ($200 to $300 /sf)
• PROS
— Preserves historical integrity
— Meets modern building codes
— Letter of intent from Harmonie
• CONS:
— Most expensive, difficult, time - consuming alternative
— Unexpected issues (EIR, etc)
1. Rough Estimates from Mark Hirth, Barry Swenson Builders,
and Jock McCoy, McCoy Construction
Option #5: Sell or Exchange Barn
• Sale or exchange of barn under
consideration —not entirely ruled out
• With zero marketing effort, we have
interest from 2 parties:
— Paul Conrado, Conrado Construction (Wine
Tasting Room)
—Kirk Phumphery, Classic Boat Works and
Storage
Development Option #6: Develop
Parcel 73
Is Vacant
hillside
lot next
to Barn —
LARGE!
But very
costly to
develop
due to
steep
Vacant Land Next to Barn
-------------- - - - - -- D . ,ES,'If1 T.
166
... O.67 AE
Y OF SARATOGA ..21.52
EE 8�
03 M` 44.50 ..2 D£TQ/t�
4
73 '
d
� 1711 � a w 6 5 ' C:
CC fri
8.
C1'rY OF
a .ol r 5.01 I 7�1 46.4 �n �o ( -
_ LZ ,o 50_C
6,1 2 f ; 30 P.C. 82 � Q 41 I .
rr ' 3 P 1 Q; (D I I ;
slope;; ZQ,� °m v�/ a 64 ti 63
N 72 , Z CO
19 .50 50 50 I 50
14525 1452/ 14519 515 -2 /4501
14525 523
S 1.N
TO 0
Bo
14489-95 14485-4
We CARTYSVI LIME
AM MAPS- PGAS
Barn Valuation
• We are currently in the process of developing a
valuation for the barn
• Hulberg &Associates Real Estate Appraisal,
San Jose, is agency of choice for unusual
structures (408) 279 -1520
• Full narrative appraisal (rough cost) _ $4,000 to
$5,000
• Appraisal will be based on "highest and best
use"
• Difficult to get "comps" for unique structure
• More information to come
Brozda Family: Leaders in Making Saratoga
a Destination for Fine Dining and Shopping
• 1967 Brozda Family moves from Santa Clara to Saratoga
• 1972: Purchases Cloud property
• 1973: Extensive renovations
- Saratoga News building converted to Maddalena's Restaurant
(now Bella Saratoga)
- Launderette Building renovated; Mrs. Brozda opens Big Basin
House Antiques (now Harmonie Day Spa)
• 1973 -1989: Cloud Barn used as print shop in basement, TV repair
shop on first floor.
• 1985: City assesses property owners to create parking district #3.
Barn development plans put "on hold" due to financiaf limitations
• April, 2004: Brozda family makes next payment on parking district
#3 assessment
• December, 2004 Final payment on parking district
Summary: Value Proposition
• Unique historic structure in downtown Saratoga
— Center of buying power in Silicon Valley
— Tradition of adaptive re -use of the property
— Models of other successful businesses in Barns in area
• Tenants ready, willing and able to expand already
successful businesses
— Letter Of Intent in hand
• Owners have long successful track record of
development in Saratoga
— Bella Saratoga, Harmonie, Thai restaurant, etc
• City officials excited about retail possibilities for Barn
anchor for attracting new business
• Income potential: $2 to $3 per square foot, N N N
But Does it Make Financial Sense?
• Finance Costs: ( @7 %)'
— $1 million = $7060 /mo
- $1.5 million = $10,120/mo
• BEST CASE Development Cost EstimateS2
— Exterior Rehab
— Interior rehab
— Financing
— Lease costs
TOTAL
Info from
1. Russ Carter, HSA Lending
2. Doug Ferrari, Meacham Oppenheimer
700,000
175,000
60,000
20, 000
$955,000
Best Case/Worst Case
WORST CASE:
• 5000 sf x $2 /sf
• Expenses
• Income
BEST CASE
• 5000 sf x$2 /sf
• Expenses
• Income
$1.5 M. rehab
10,000 /mo
10,120 /mo
- $120 /mo or -$1440
$1 M rehab
10,000 /mo
7,060 /mo
$2,940/mo or $s5,280
NOTE: DOES NOT INCLUDE 10% ANNUAL VACANCY RATE
Middle -of -the Road Case
$1.25 M rehab
• 5000 sf x $2 /sf
• Expenses
• Income
$10,000 /mo
8,500 /mo
1500 /mo or $18,000
Conclusions
• Initial Financial Returns: -1.5% to 3.5
• High risk; difficult to justify investment
• Much more feasible if returns around $3 /sf
REQUEST: We
would ask to
hold
off further
development
consideration
until
December,
2004
• Improving macroeconomic climate
• Parking assessment paid off
0
Next Steps
Complete barn valuation
Update existing plans
Update and complete ex
fisting structural
engineering plans
•
Determine. most appropriate development
option
• Determine financial options
• "Go /no -go" decision
Thanks to...
• Aaron Barger, Project Manager, Barry Swenson, San Jose
• Dixie Divine, Sales Executive, Meacham - Oppenheimer, San Jose
• Doug Ferrari, Sales Executive, Meacham Oppenheimer, San Jose
• Angelo Grova, Owner, Michael Angelo Studios and Gallery, Santa
Cruz
• April Halberstadt, Director, Saratoga Historical museum
• Warren Heid, Architect, Saratoga
• Mark Hirth, Project Manager, Barry Swenson Construction, San
Jose
• Chien Lee, Chien Lee Engineering, San Jose
• Brad Lind, Building Inspector, Saratoga
• Jock McCoy, McCoy Construction, Los Gatos
• Danielle Surdin, Director of Development, City of Saratoga
• Lata Vasudevan, Planner, City of Saratoga
0
�..aY
John Livingstone
From:
baileywick @att.net
Sent:
Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:29 PM
To:
John Livingstone
Cc:
Lata Vasudevan
Subject:
Grant Stipulations
John:
Here are the funding conditions for the HHC approved Historic Park grant funds:
1. Expenditure of funds restricted to the rehabilitation of the McWilliams House (no
personnel costs).
2. Applicant must submit proposed McWilliams House rehabilitation plans to the HHC for
review and comment prior to review by the Saratoga Heritage Preservation Commission (if
required).
3 Applicant must provide documentation of a public access schedule approved by the Santa
Clara County Parks and Recreation Department.
This is from Dana Peak's March staff report found on the HHC website
recommendations were accepted by the HHC at their March 18th meeting
condition #2 reads the way it does.
Thanks much, Pat
1
These
I've no idea why
City of Saratoga Planning Commission
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jill Hunter, Chair
DATE: March 17, 2004
RE: Planning Commission Work Program
Mission Statement
The mission of the Saratoga Planning Commission is to maintain the unique character
of Saratoga by ensuring that the physical development of the City is consistent with the
environmental, social and economic goals as set forth in the City's General Plan.
The Planning Commission advises the City Council on land use matters such as the
General Plan and specific plans, zoning and subdivisions. The Commission plans for
the future orderly physical development of the City and informs and educates the public
C current land use and urban planning issues. In many areas the Planning
Commission also acts as a legislative body in making determinations within the
framework of applicable State laws and City ordinances. Ultimate decisions on land use
eside with the City Council.
Recent Accomplishments
Article #
Title
Target Date
Status 1/1/04
Article 15 -50
Tree Regulations
Winter 2003
ADOPTED
Article 15 -12
Single - Family
Winter 2003
Residential Districts
ADOPTED
Article 15 -45
Design Review: Single-
Winter 2003
Family Dwelling
ADOPTED
Article 14
Subdivision Ordinance
Winter 2003
ADOPTED
Article 15 -06
Definitions
Summer 2003
ADOPTED
Article 15 -10
Overlay Zone to Allow
Fall 2003
drive through windows
ADOPTED
in CN Zone bounded by
Lawrence and Prospect
Zoning Code Updates for 2004105
Article 15 -58
Mixed Use
Fall
Hearing Draft Completed went to PC in October
(new)
Development
2003
2003. PC continued until Winter 04
Parks and Recreation Commission, Planning Commission
Standards
and Trails Sub - Committee. Ann Welsh is the lead staff.
Article 15 -30
Sign Ordinance
Winter 2004
Going to PC in 2004, Staff is still researching
Spring 2004
Adopted in 1991. Currently being worked on through the
Master Plan
defensibly si n ordinances
Not Yet
Public and Quasi
Spring 2004
Being reviewed by Staff Planners
Assigned
Public Facilities
Parks and Recreation Element. Ann Welsh is the lead staff.
Districts
Conservation
Spring 2004
Article 15 -18
P -A: Professional
Winter 2004
Needs to follow Land Use Element update
and Administrative
date will slip
Office District
Article 15 -30
Sign Ordinance
Spring 2004
Draft being reviewed by City Attorney and
the years — not all placed in document. Christy Oosterhous
Planning Staff
Article 15 -46
Design Review:
Fall 2004
Not yet started
Hearing antici ated in Winter/Spring of 2005
Multi- Family
Dwelling and
Commercial
Structures
Article 15 -17
R -M: Multi - Family
Summer 2004
Not yet started
Residential Districts
Article 15-
Generator Use
Spring 2004
Not yet started
Permit requirement
Article 14, 15
Storm Water
Winter 2004
Planning Commission approved goes to the
and 16
Pollution Control
City Council March 2004
amendments
General Plan Updates for 2004/05
Element Title
Target Date
Status
Open Space
Spring 2004
Adopted in 1993. Currently being worked on through the
Parks and Recreation Commission, Planning Commission
and Trails Sub - Committee. Ann Welsh is the lead staff.
Will conduct hearings in Summer /Fall of 2004
Parks and Trails
Spring 2004
Adopted in 1991. Currently being worked on through the
Master Plan
Parks and Recreation Commission, Planning Commission
and Trails Sub - Committee. This will be integrated into the
Parks and Recreation Element. Ann Welsh is the lead staff.
Will conduct hearings in Summer /Fall of 2004
Conservation
Spring 2004
Adopted in 1988. No none amendments, but we are
searching the records. Currently being worked on through
the Parks and Recreation Commission, Planning
Commission and Trails Sub - Committee. Ann Welsh is the
lead staff. Will conduct hearings in Summer /Fall of 2004
Land Use
Spring 2004
Adopted in 1983. Various text and map amendments over
the years — not all placed in document. Christy Oosterhous
is the lead staff. Citizen Advisory Committee being set up.
Hearing antici ated in Winter/Spring of 2005
City Manager's Office
13777 Fruitvale Ave.
Saratoga, CA 945050
Tel: 408/868 -1215
fax: 408/867 -8559
Memo
To:
Staff Commission Liaisons
Cc:
City Council, City Manager
From:
Lorie, Cathleen and Tom
Date:
February 20, 2004
Re:
Meeting Follow up
Just so everyone is clear about the outcome from last week's meeting, here's # summary:
■ Work Plan. For this year, Commissions should put together a work pla# based on their
goals and provide a copy to Cathleen by April 21. If any portion of the ork plan involves
funding, a cost estimate should be included.
She and I will package them together to take to Council the May 5 meetin ommissiol
chairs and staff should plan to attend the meeting. Counc and approve all or
part of the work plans, and any approved budget requests will be incorporated into the
budget for 2004 -05.
Next year and going forward, Commissions should have their work plans ready by
February for presentation to Council at the first meeting in March 2005.
This process applies to all Commissions except the Youth Commission.
■ Chair Elections. Chair and Vice Chair elections can remain on the same schedule as now.
(Thanks to everyone for your feedback at the meeting.)
Minutes Format. Minutes become action minutes only effective now. Refer to the
sample Cathleen gave you or ask one of us for help if you are uncertain. Email the
approved minutes to Council. Please keep in mind that the format may evolve over the next
few months.
■ Commission/Council Relations. Council is working on adding material to the
Commissioners' Handbook that clarifies the relationship between them and Commissions,
as well as Council expectations about Commission responsibilities. Council Commission
liaison assignments will not continue beyond July 1, 2004. In addition, the trend is toward
moving Commissions back to their mission as advisory policy bodies and away from
sponsoring events, volunteering and fundraising. Right now the handbook is scheduled to
go to Council for consideration on May 5 —at the same meeting as the work plans.
■ Commission Budget. Continue to submit to me a request for funds for Commission
training, memberships, conferences, retreat food, business cards, office supplies, etc., for
next year as we've done in past years. Any project -type funding must be included in their
work plan and be specifically approved by Council.
Questions? Just ask one of us. Thanks.
• Page 2
SARATOGA HISTORICAL
FOUNDATION
POST OFFICE BOX 172, SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95071
To: Tom Sullivan, Director of Planning, City of Saratoga
To: Historic Preservation Commission, City of Saratoga
It has come to our attention that the historic Sam Cloud barn is in great jeopardy and may
soon be lost to the community. We find that the barn is threatened not only by age and
infirmity, but by the City's current time -line requirements regarding repairs. We understand
that the building needs substantial and expensive structural work and that the owners have
been diligently exploring ways to restore the structure.
We would encourage you to find a way to extend the study period for this structure. Since
the barn is not in immediate danger of collapse and does not apparently threaten public
safety, we would urge you to allow the owners to continue their studies to find a suitable
outcome for this dilemma. We understand that the owners are retired and have not been
in good health, and the City has already granted extensions which we find commendable.
However, this Barn is such a critical element in the Saratoga Village landscape that it
warrants extraordinary scrutiny.
While we attribute the Barn to Sam Cloud, one of Saratoga's early merchants, it is possible
that the structure dates from an earlier era and may have been built by people associated
with the operation of stage lines and livery stables along what we now know as Highway
9. Now designated as a scenic highway, Highway 9 is the road that travels between the
Mission in Santa Clara to the Pacific Ocean and is one of the earliest major public
thoroughfares in the state. It is reasonable to assume that Saratoga Village, established
in the early 1850's, would have such an establishment to serve this important
thoroughfare. We feel this barn deserves greater consideration.
We realize the City is required to protect its citizens from potential hazard, but this
structure seems to be quite stable, pardon the pun, at present. So we encourage you to
allow the owners the time needed under the circumstances. The Sam Cloud barn is a
unique barn to Saratoga, to Santa Clara Valley and to California. We should not move
toward demolition without completing exploring all the options.
CC: Saratoga City Council
Sin ly,
Bob Louden, president
Saratoga Historical oundation
SARATOGA HISTORICAL
FOUNDATION
POST OFFICE BOX 172, SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95071
To: Tom Sullivan, Director of Planning, City of Saratoga
To: Historic Preservation Commission, City of Saratoga
It has come to our attention that the historic Sam Cloud barn is in great jeopardy and may
soon be lost to the community. We find that the barn is threatened not only by age and
infirmity, but by the City's current time -line requirements regarding repairs. We understand
that the building needs substantial and expensive structural work and that the owners have
been diligently exploring ways to restore the structure.
We would encourage you to find a way to extend the study period for this structure. Since
the barn is not in immediate danger of collapse and does not apparently threaten public
safety, we would urge you to allow the owners to continue their studies to find a suitable
outcome for this dilemma. We understand that the owners are retired and have not been
in good health, and the City has already granted extensions which we find commendable.
However, this Barn is such a critical element in the Saratoga Village landscape that it
warrants extraordinary scrutiny.
While we attribute the Barn to Sam Cloud, one of Saratoga's early merchants, it is possible
that the structure dates from an earlier era and may have been built by people associated
with the operation of stage lines and livery stables along what we now know as Highway
9. Now designated as a scenic highway, Highway 9 is the road that travels between the
Mission in Santa Clara to the Pacific Ocean and is one of the earliest major public
thoroughfares in the state. It is reasonable to assume that Saratoga Village, established
in the early 1850's, would have such an establishment to serve this important
thoroughfare. We feel this barn deserves greater consideration.
We realize the City is required to protect its citizens from potential hazard, but this
structure seems to be quite stable, pardon the pun, at present. So we encourage you to
allow the owners the time needed under the circumstances. The Sam Cloud barn is a
unique barn to Saratoga, to Santa Clara Valley and to California. We should not move
toward demolition without completing exploring all the options.
ferely,
Bob Louden, president
Saratoga Historical Foundation
CC: Saratoga City Council ?J/ I �_/a
The Mayor and City Council,
Saratoga City Hall,
13777 Fruitvale Avenue,
Saratoga: 95070.
,..;..,.....March.19;. 20.4.
RE: FATE OF THE HISTORIC SAM CLOUD BARN
Dear Mayor Waltonsmith and members of. the Saratoga City Council,
We, are the largest historic preservation advocacy organization in the South Bay. Over the.last
fiften years, we have established a reputation for. careful analysis of threats to historic
properties. It has come to our attention that the.1870.s.Sam Cloud barn is threatened with
demolition, and we are writing to you to ask for a further extension that will allow a suitable_
tenant to be found.
We fully understand that you have concerns over the safety of the structure. Any unused
building presents potential safety hazards. However, it would be overkill to demolish the whole
structure when a sensitive restoration would address the safety concerns equally well. From a
CEQA perspective, and from the perspective of the City of Saratoga's own policies on.heritage
preservation, the demolition of a historic resource should not be undertaken lightly.
The owners of the property have been working hard and in good faith to find possible reuses for
the barn. The Barn Again! program (htt.12://www.nationaltrust.org/rur 11barnag html) gives
hundreds of examples of successful barn restorations across the country.
We know that it can often be hard to find a good tenant for a building. But please don't let the
fact that the owners have yet to find one mean that the barn is torn down. It's a unique and
beautiful part of Saratoga's heritage, and is well worth saving.
You are welcome to contact me on (408) 998 -8105 or at alex @preservation.org if you would like to
follow up on this letter, and I would be most happy to answer any questions.
Yours truly,
A ex Marthews,
Executive Director.
Le Petit Trianon, 72 N 51h St., Suite 9, San Jose, CA. Mail: P.O. Box 2287, San Jose, CA, 95109 -2287
www.12reservation.org • Tel/Fax: (408) 998 -8105 • info @preservation__org
PACSJ is a 501 (c) 3 non- profit organization. EIN: 77- 0254542
I-
/
John Livingstone
From: John Livingstone
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:21 AM
To: alex @ preservation. org'
Subject: Sam Cloud Barn
Dear Mr. Marthews,
Your letter to the City of Saratoga's Mayor dated March 19, 2004 seems to imply that the City is threatening the demolition
of the structure. This is not the case. The owners at one point announced to the City that they wanted to apply for a
demolition permit. I explained the CEQA process to the owners representative stressing the importance of preserving
historic structures and the next day the property was put up for sale.
Please feel free to call me with any questions at 868.1231.
Thank you
John Livingstone, AICP
Associate Planner
V- II1-
SARATOGA HISTORICAL
FOUNDATION
POST OFFICE BOX 172, SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95071
To: Tom Sullivan, Director of Planning, City of Saratoga
To: Historic Preservation Commission, City of Saratoga
It has come to our attention that the historic Sam Cloud barn is in great jeopardy and may
soon be lost to the community. We find that the barn is threatened not only by age and
infirmity, but by the City's current time -line requirements regarding repairs. We understand
that the building needs substantial and expensive structural work and that the owners have
been diligently exploring ways to restore the structure.
We would encourage you to find a way to extend the study period for this structure. Since
the barn is not in immediate danger of collapse and does not apparently threaten public
safety, we would urge you to allow the owners to continue their studies to find a suitable
outcome for this dilemma. We understand that the owners are retired and have not been
in good health, and the City has already granted extensions which we find commendable.
However, this Barn is such a critical element in the Saratoga Village landscape that it
warrants extraordinary scrutiny.
While we attribute the Barn to Sam Cloud, one of Saratoga's early merchants, it is possible
that the structure dates from an earlier era and may have been built by people associated
with the operation of stage lines and livery stables along what we now know as Highway
9. Now designated as a scenic highway, Highway 9 is the road that travels between the
Mission in Santa Clara to the Pacific Ocean and is one of the earliest major public
thoroughfares in the state. It is reasonable to assume that Saratoga Village, established
in the early 1850's, would have such an establishment to serve this important
thoroughfare. We feel this barn deserves greater consideration.
We realize the City is required to protect its citizens from potential hazard, but this
structure seems to be quite stable, pardon the pun, at present. So we encourage you to
allow the owners the time needed under the circumstances. The Sam Cloud barn is a
unique barn to Saratoga, to Santa Clara Valley and to California. We should not move
toward demolition without completing exploring all the options.
CC: Saratoga City Council
Si c rely,
A den, president
Saratoga Historical, Foundation
38Cl��