HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-14-07 Heritage Preservation Commission Agenda PacketCITY OF SARATOGA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
13777 FRUITVALE AVE,.SARATOGA, CA 95070
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET
TO: FROM:
Norm Koepernik Christopher Riordan
COMPANY: DATE':
HPC August 6, 2007
FAX NUN413Ell:
TO'T'AL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER:
408 - 297 -8270
7
PHONE' NUM1313R:
FAX NUMBER:
408 - 971 -9636
408 - 867 -8555
RE: YOUR RI "sFI'RP.NCE NUMB iR:
August HPC Agenda & July NA
Minutes
❑ URGE-NT Q FOR REVIICW ❑ PLI ASIC COD4N91CNT ❑ PLEASE RICPL,Y ❑ PLF-ASIC RI-CYCL1'
NOTICS /COMMI INTS:
Norm,
Attached is the draft agenda for the August 14, 2007 meeting of the HPC. We have
three items for New Business. Please review and let me know if you would like to
remove any items from the Old Business list or add items to the Pending Items list.
Also included are the draft minutes of the July 10, 2007 meeting for your review and
comments.
I will call you later today to discuss any changes that you may suggest.
R/
Christopher Riordan
City of Saratoga
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
AGENDA
Date: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 8:30 a.m.
Place: Planning Conference Room, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Type: Regular Meeting — Please meet in the parking lot in front of the
Warner Hutton House at 8:30 A.M. and Staff will provide
transportation to the site visit under New Business and return to the
Planning Conference Room by 9:20 A.M.
1. Routine Organization
A. Roll Call
B. Approval of minutes from July 10, 2007 meeting
C. Posting of Agenda — Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, the
agenda was posted on August 9, 2007
D. Oral & Written Communication - Any member of the public may address the
Commission about any matter not on the agenda for this meeting for up to
three minutes. Commissioners may not comment on the matter but may
choose to place the topic on a future agenda.
E. Oral Communications — Historic Preservation Commission direction to Staff —
Instruction to staff regarding actions on current Oral Communications.
2. Old Business
A. Discuss National Registry & Saratoga Landmark Plaques
B. Discuss Heritage Orchard Signage.
C. Discuss Historic Incentives
D. Discuss Mustard Walk
E. Discuss Sign for McWilliams House
F. Discuss Orchard Pathway
3. New Business
A. 8:35 A.M. Site Visit — 13601 Saratoga Avenue — Review proposed
replacement buildings for Saint Andrew's Parish and School and determine
consistency with Heritage Lane.
B. 8:50 A.M. Site Visit - 18524 Montpere Way — Determination of the historical
significance of the residence that the owner would like to remodel.
C. 9:05 A.M. Site Visit - 15211 Hume Drive — Determine if the existing
residence is of historical significance. Applicant is proposing demolition.
4. Pending Items
A. Historic Resources Inventory
B. McWilliams House Renovation
C. National Register Applications
D. Adopt a Tree Program for the Heritage Orchard
E. Update Heritage Ordinance
F. Review Oak Street as a Heritage Lane
G. Review additional content for Heritage Resources webpage
H. Historic Preservation Data Base
I. Review list of properties with structures 50 years and over in age
5. Adjournment
Adjourn to 8:30 a.m. Tuesday, September 11, 2007, Planning Conference Room,
13777 Fruitvale Avenue.
Please advise the Chair if you will be absent from the next scheduled meeting
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you are a disabled person and you
need a disability - related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please
contact the City Clerk's Office at (408) 868 — 1269 or ctclerk @saratoga.ca.us. Requests must
be made as early as possible and at least one full business day before the start of the meeting.
Any recommendation made by the Heritage Preservation Commission may be appealed to the
Planning Commission within ten (10) days of the date of the decision. The appeal shall be
taken by filing with the Secretary of the Planning Commission a written notice and filing fee
within ten (10) days of the date of the decision.
Certificate of Posting of Agenda:
I, Christopher Riordan, Senior Planner for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing
agenda for the meeting of the Heritage Preservation Commission of the City of Saratoga was
posted at the office of the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga, CA 95070 and was
available for public review at that location. The agenda is also available on the City's website at
www.saratoga.ca.us.
Signed this 09`h day of August 2007 at Saratoga, a4vko
Christopher Fkiordan
Senior Planner
City of Saratoga
(408) 868 -1235
City of Saratoga
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
DRAFT MINUTES
Date: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 8:30 a.m.
Place: Planning Conference Room, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Type: Regular Meeting — Please meet in the parking lot in front of the
Warner Hutton House at 8:30 a.m. and Staff will provide
transportation to the site visit under New Business and return to the
Planning Conference Room by 9:00 a.m.
1. Routine Organization
A. Roll Call
PRESENT: Commissioners Gomersall, Louden, McCarty, Chair Koepernik
and Vice Chair Kellond
ABSENT: Commissioner Marra
GUESTS: Mr. Mike Belshe, Ms. April Halberstadt
STAFF: Senior Planner Chris Riordan, Assistant Planner Shweta Bhatt
B. Approval of minutes from June 12, 2007 meeting — Approved 5 -0
C. Posting of Agenda — Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, the
agenda was posted on July 05, 2007
D. Oral & Written Communication - Any member of the public may address the
Commission about any matter not on the agenda for this meeting for up to
three minutes. Commissioners may not comment on the matter but may
choose to place the topic on a future agenda.
■ Ms. April Halberstadt expressed her concern that some single family
home remodels reviewed by the Historical Preservation Commission
had lost their historical integrity by the time the project was completed
and that there had been a lack of follow -up to ensure that what had
been presented to the Commission had ultimately been constructed.
E. Oral Communications — Historic Preservation Commission direction to Staff —
Instruction to staff regarding actions on current Oral Communications. —
None.
2. Old Business
A. Discuss National Registry & Saratoga Landmark Plaques — Item discussed.
Commissioner Louden presented to the Commission the proofs of the
Saratoga Landmark Plaques and informed the Commission that they would
arrive within the next month.
B. Discuss Heritage Orchard Signage — Item discussed. Chair Koepernik stated
that he is still getting bids for the orchard signage.
C. Discuss Historic Incentives — Item discussed. Ms. Halberstadt discussed the
need for state incentives. Vice Chair Kellond stated that incentives could
include financial or reduced restrictions when applying for a building permit.
Chair Koepernik suggested that each member of the Commission think about
historical incentive ideas and have them ready for the next meeting.
D. Discuss Mustard Walk — Item not discussed
E. Discuss Sign for McWilliams House — Item not discussed
F. Discuss Landscaping Plan for Historic Park — Item discussed. Ms.
Halberstadt exhibited photographs of the site and the intersection of Oak
Street and Highway Nine and presented the landscape plan and her ideas for
the new signs and their location for the museum. Chair Koepernik expressed
his wish that there be name plates installed to identify the species of each
new plant and that he would like the redwood tree removed. Vice Chair
Kellond expressed his concern about site drainage and the effect of the
redwood tree on the health of the Oaks. Chair Koepernik stated his concern
that the redwood tree is affecting the health of the two oaks and that it shades
the existing landscaping and he recommended that it be removed. The below
motions were made and carried on the following votes
Redwood tree removal: Motion by Chair Koepernik and seconded by
Commissioner Louden to recommend removal of the redwood tree.
Approved 5 -0 vote.
Conceptual Landscape Plan: Motion by Chair Koepernik and seconded by
Commissioner Louden to approve the conceptual landscape plan.
Approved 5 -0
3. New Business
A. 8:30 A.M. Site Visit — 13601 Saratoga Avenue — Review proposed
illuminated monument sign and determine consistency with Heritage Lane. —
Site visit completed with representative from Saint Andrews Episcopal Church
& School (Bruce Friesen) present. Motion to approve by Commissioner
Kellond and seconded by Commissioner Louden and carried by a 5 -0 vote.
B. 8:45 A.M. Site Visit — 13855 Saratoga Avenue — Applicant is requesting
modifications, historic landmark status, and Mills Act designation. Site visit
completed with applicant/owner (Mr. Mike Belshe) present. Item discussed.
Vice Chair Kellond liked the applicant's choice of roofing shingles and
requested that the shingle color, Country ..., be placed into the record.
Commissioner Louden stated that he liked the choice of shingle color. Vice
Chair Kellond stated that the applicant's proposed fence design is an
improvement from what was originally proposed but felt that the picture that
was included in the packet was not specific enough with respect to the
proposed design. Mr. Belshe replied that there are not particular fence
designs on historic homes, that his ultimate goal is to protect his kids from
running into the street, and that the proposed fence was moved back so now
it would be at least 60 -70 feet away from the street. Vice Chair Kellond
agreed with the proposed fence location. Commissioner Gomersall stated
that she liked the location of the fence and expressed her approval of its four
foot height. Chair Koepernik expressed his approval of the fences location
and height. Commissioner McCarty agreed with the applicant's urgency to
erect the fence so as to provide protection for his children. Commissioner
Louden expressed his approval of the fence and stated that he was in favor of
its simplistic design. Vice Chair stated his concern that he does not want to
the Commission to design the fence for the applicant and expressed his
desire to have the applicant's historian review the appropriateness of the
fence design and to have the historian prepare a written document of her
findings for the Commission's review. Mr. Belshe stated that the proposed
fence design was not historically accurate. Assistant Planner Bhatt reminded
the Commission that the applicant would be applying for the Mills Act. The
below motions were made and carried on the following votes:
Fence: Motion by Chair Koepernik and seconded by Commissioner McCarty
to approve the proposed four foot tall fence in a location that is setback
behind the fireplace and symmetrical to both sides. Approved 4 -1
Roof.- Motion by Vice Chair Kellond and seconded by Commissioner Louden
to approve the roofing material. Approved 5 -0
Mills Act: Motion by Chair Koepernik and seconded by Vice Chair Kellond to
recommend to the applicant that he proceed with the Mills Act designation.
Approved 5 -0
4. Pending Items
A. Historic Resources Inventory
B. McWilliams House Renovation
C. National Register Applications
D. Adopt a Tree Program for the Heritage Orchard
E. Update Heritage Ordinance
F. Review Oak Street as a Heritage Lane
G. Review additional content for Heritage Resources webpage
H. Historic Preservation Data Base
I. Review list of properties with structures 50 years and over in age
5. Adjournment
Adjourn to 8:30 a.m. Tuesday, August 14, 2007, Planning Conference Room,
13777 Fruitvale Avenue.
Community Development Department
City of Saratoga
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, California 95070
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 14, 2007
TO: Heritage Preservation Commission
FROM: Christopher Alan Riordan, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Proposed new facilities for Saint Andrew's Parish and School
Property Location: 13601 Saratoga Avenue, Saratoga, California
Property APN: 393 -25 -028
Project Applicant: Saint Andrew's Parish
Property Owner: Saint Andrew's Parish
Project Description
Saint Andrew's provides schooling for children at levels pre- kindergarten through the 8`h grade.
Existing enrollment is approximately 415 students. The maximum number of employees is 68
(52 for school and 16 for parish). The project site is five -acres or 217,800 square feet. The
zoning is R -1- 20,000. The General Plan designation is Quasi - Public Facility.
The applicant received Design Review Approval on March 12, 2003, to construct six new
structures, consisting of approximately 72,705 square -feet to support St. Andrew's church and
school activities. These structures included a gymnasium /performing arts center,
administrative /classroom wing, north classroom wing, clergy offices, parish center, and a bell
tower. The gymnasium /performing arts center and the parish center have been constructed.
Planning Commission approval has a three year expiration date.. Building permits and
construction was not commenced on the two classroom wings and the clergy offices in this three
year period and the entitlements granted by the Planning Commission have expired. The bell
tower is no longer part of the project.
The Historical Preservation Commission (HPC) reviewed the original project on March 11, 2003
and unanimously recommended (7 -0) approval of the project to the City council.
The new project, Phase IV, is an application for Design Review for the construction of the two
classroom buildings and the clergy offices that were not constructed under the previously
approved project. The following is a description of the buildings that would makeup Phase IV of
the project.
Administration /Classroom Wing
Classrooms and administration offices are located in a three -story 24,928 square foot building,
which has a maximum height of 30 feet. A discovery center, which includes a school library, is
also located in this building. This building serves as the main entry-to the campus. It is the
largest building in the proposed development and is located near the center of the site. The
administration/classroom wing is linked by a pedestrian annex to the nearby north classroom
wing.
HPC August 14, 2007 Meeting
Project Address: 13601 Saratoga Avenue
Project Applicant: Saint Andrew's Parish
Proposed new facilities for Saint Andrew's Parish and School
North Classroom Wing
The north classroom wing is a two -story 16,332 square feet building. It. will contain 15
classrooms and related support spaces. The maximum height of the north classroom wing is 30
feet.
Clergy Offices Building
The clergy office is an 8,660 square foot three -story building. This building will contain all of
he administration functions for the Parish as well as the remaining Sunday school classrooms.
This building has multiple meeting and conference rooms and a lounge. The maximum height of
this building would be 40 feet.
Covered Walkways
Pedestrian site circulation between the various buildings will occur under covered walkways
made of redwood posts and rafters, with low sloped roofs.
The following are two options available to the Commission in reviewing this proposal:
1. Determine that the proposed project is in accordance with the Secretary of the
Interior Standards and that it will not have an impact on the historic and rural
character of the Heritage Lane: If the HPC determines that the sign will not have an
impact on the historic and rural character of Saratoga Avenue as a Heritage Lane, the
applicant may apply for required permits.
2. Request changes to proposed project: Require the applicant to revise the plans and ask
the applicant to return to the Heritage Preservation Commission for additional review.
Attachments
(1) Project Plans
Memorandum to the Saratoga Heritage Preservation Commission Page 2
`3
COVERED
OUTDOOR
AREA —
60x4O' FIRE
ENGINE
HAMMERHEAD
TURNAROUND —T
® \'
A3.4
/ 10
/
10' Seer Pipeina Eoae
Per 2277 OR 339 — Lacot:on
U I
I
I 1
Taken Iron 103 Maps 16
1
SHEET NOTES
4
PICK —UP/
1 1
% 1134 DROP —OFF #'2 / � —_
1 NEW PARKING COUNT
/
- - --" —" /
_
146 STANDARD SPACES ® 9' -6 "x18' -0"
/
\
50 COMPACT SPACES 0 8' -0'x 16' -0"
"x18'
1
DN Y� / /
7 ACCESSIBLE SPACES ® 14' -0 -0"
/ / / \/ / "�•
' C
203 SPACES TOTAL
�\ I O
/ / / / \
/
2— SEE "L" SERIES DRAWINGS FOR LANDSCAPE INFORMATION
\
w e Ciearorce Eosemanl
3— SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR PROPERTY LINES, GRADING, DRAINAGE, ETC
® \'
A3.4
/ 10
/
C
C
C np pp
C �7 p
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
1 1
PIjK —U0/
1 _ DROP —OFF /1
Du
�J
a
1
` \ Pa 1709 Maps 16
O \\ \ APPROX. CAMERA POSITION
FOR PHOTO — SEE 2/A3.5
\:
A3.4
NORTH WING
Phase IV
I O 1' I
I � �
�� L t� •n ` "1'/ 15' MINIMUM SETBACK
V /�� Ju c�4 TO PROPERTY LINE
\a
C c c c HClclClclC c c c c c c c c e c c c c e c c c c C
11
tt
EXISTING
SANCTUARY
SITE PLAN
I w4E r -7e
SARATOGA AVE.
I.1 - -APROX. CAMERA POSITION
FOR PHOTO — SEE 3/A3.5
1�•' 8' HIGH ACOUSTIC
NOISE BARRIER
ALONG PROPERTY LINE
I1;
1�.1
1111`
II 6' HIGH DECORATIVE
Ii11, � WOOD FENCE
111,
j;
111 5' PGE and PTT Eesemenl
—'11 Par 4447 OR 113
11,
1
11�
1�1
N
0 15' 60'
pmommmmmmol
30'
CSDA
ARCHITECTS
CaAett. Sl a t Mal. AcAl.t4 I..
120 Montgonlxy Sheet. Sake 1170
Som F—i—. CA 94104
da gnOcsexck tects.
415.693.98 00
415.693.9630
U I
I
I 1
1
1
1
U
1 1
iC
1
C
' C
C
C
C np pp
C �7 p
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
1 1
PIjK —U0/
1 _ DROP —OFF /1
Du
�J
a
1
` \ Pa 1709 Maps 16
O \\ \ APPROX. CAMERA POSITION
FOR PHOTO — SEE 2/A3.5
\:
A3.4
NORTH WING
Phase IV
I O 1' I
I � �
�� L t� •n ` "1'/ 15' MINIMUM SETBACK
V /�� Ju c�4 TO PROPERTY LINE
\a
C c c c HClclClclC c c c c c c c c e c c c c e c c c c C
11
tt
EXISTING
SANCTUARY
SITE PLAN
I w4E r -7e
SARATOGA AVE.
I.1 - -APROX. CAMERA POSITION
FOR PHOTO — SEE 3/A3.5
1�•' 8' HIGH ACOUSTIC
NOISE BARRIER
ALONG PROPERTY LINE
I1;
1�.1
1111`
II 6' HIGH DECORATIVE
Ii11, � WOOD FENCE
111,
j;
111 5' PGE and PTT Eesemenl
—'11 Par 4447 OR 113
11,
1
11�
1�1
N
0 15' 60'
pmommmmmmol
30'
CSDA
ARCHITECTS
CaAett. Sl a t Mal. AcAl.t4 I..
120 Montgonlxy Sheet. Sake 1170
Som F—i—. CA 94104
da gnOcsexck tects.
415.693.98 00
415.693.9630
CONSULTANT
ARCHITECT STAMP
CONSULTANT STAMP
AUTHORITY APPROVAL
PWMECT ADDRESS
ST. ANDREW'S
PARISH do SCHOOL
PLAN. DEPT.
SUBMITTAL
13601 SARATOGA AVE
SARATOGA, CA 95070
MARx:
DATE
I OESCRIFWC
Owm
BY:
CHK'0 6Y:
CSOA ARCWTECTS 2002
SHEET TIRE
ARCHITECTURAL
SITE PLAN
SCALE
l0 .11 2.
.,.Aw ... >. - :.1111
f16 A1.1
4
If
L
4.
't
a a r m rr.n PI u
PERFORMING ARTS / GYM. — EAST ELEVATION
4
SCALE 1/1611-0
r:r_C f try AQ.Ir rec E•re rr>±I en
2 PERFORMING ARTS / GYM. — NORTH ELEVATION
sCA& In6-r0
CEllDR RASTER - COLOR 12
OW ACCENT PANELS
TEXIURD Cam
RASTER, - COLOR p i
ASPHALT SHINGLE
3 PERFORMING ARTS / GYM. — SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE In6-r0
LOW 'r DOUBLE MAZINC IN
fIE01QE A1100ZED FRNE
--
Cf]ENf i7/STER -COLOR 12 1 .
tcrr rrEj rce c cz, r r. r r. r. r- r n
TEVURW CEMENT
PIASGE'R - COLOR /3
Yip _
1 PERFORMING ARTS / GYM. — WEST ELEVATION
SCALE III6 -1-0-
TTO%lftxw R"
�11im smu COLOR
T.O. ROOF +<'
t� •
ASPHALT SMILE
5- WOOD SION USE �1- COLOR it
IOW •E• DOME C AZING N
BRONZE ANODIZED FRWIE
RASTER - COLOR 13
MAIN LEVEL 0-
+362
LOWER LEVEL
+351 --
CEWDff
PIAASFER -COLOR /3
ASRMLT SHINGLE
INSET ACCENT PANELS
Ir WOOD SIDING - COLOR 11
IMURED CUM
KaTER - COLOR w T.O. ROOF �+
+-390
T.O. PARAPET
_ +375
~ MAIN LEVEL
- +362
LOWER. LEVEL
+351
LOW T DOABLE (LAZING N
BRONZE ANODIZED FRAME
cAN1WLAI
to
'V3
0 16
SCALE
8 32
NOTE SEE MEET M-1 FOR MATERIALS COLORS AND FM ES
CSDA
ARCHITECTS
cww sow A mAD Ar"mc* N3-
Ii0 $Nl.a. sft 1170
04 $4104
as.BLLTaeOo
415.MSIB30
CONSAIANT
ARCHRECT STANP
,Ao
�j
f II�W AN1'aN �
1>tEGH9'M
um Al 2.Kwf�
FRam 'OGRESS
ST. ANDREW'S
PARISH do SCHOOL
PLAN. DEPT.
SUBMITTAL
13601 SARATOGA AVE.
SARATOGA CA 95070
M L
OATS
OESCRWRON:
WAN
BT:
a" e1-:
' CSM ARCKIECTS 20113
SHEET TOLE
PERFORMING
ARTS / GYMNASIUM
ELEVATIONS
NAL SCALE
1D . ,r
JMUU'/ l3. am 2131.01
SHEET
"BEG All
s
ROOFED BRIDGE
TO NORTH
CLASSROOM MN
t
8 ADMIN. / CLASSROOM — WEST ELEVATION
surE I /NetiN"a
MOOD FASCIA AND CSM -
CUTTER PNNTED WHITE
ASPHALT SHNIGIE
CEMENT PLASIEIt - COLOR /2
OPERANE LOW 'E' DOUBLE
GAZING N BRONZE
A4000D FRAME
lEXrLN D CEMENT
PIASTER - COLOR p
METAL WtxNW' ROOF
W MATCH SHINGLE COMDR
MOOD FASCIA Na GSM
GUTTER PARED off
CEMENT RASTER - COLOR #2
OPERABLE LOW 'E' DOUBLE
CIAZNC N BRONZE
ANOORED FRAME
TEIGURFD CEMENT
RASTER - COLOR 03 —
W NORTH
CLASSROOM WING
TEXNRED CEMENT
RASTER - COLOR 14 —
ROOF,
- - +400
— — — - - r -a RooE— qv
+395
r tj,— -- UPPER LEVEL
+376
e - -- MAIN _L_EY�L -�!
+363.5
LOWER LEVEL
+351
ADMIN. / CLASSROOM — SOUTH ELEVATION
7
seuE 1ne-1"V
6 i� ADMIN. / CLASSROOM — NORTH ELEVATION ADMIN. / CLASSROOM — EAST ELEVATION
xNE 1n•�I a 5 scNE Ine+ ra
IF000 FASCIA AND GSM
GUTTER PNNFD Off
e
_
ASPHALT SHINGLE
OPERABLE LOIN E.
DOUBLE pAZ61C T
�La s eaDFaE AJ1002ED� i
4 NORTH CLASSROOM WING — WEST ML /AMONR
SCALE 1 /1eti1'a
—
2 NORTH CLASSROOM WING — NORTH ELEVATION
sauE Vletita
- - Uo.►IQ!+ gOF
+400
- -T4_MOF__ -VA-
+395
ROOFED BRIDGE
TO NORTH
aus m WING UPPER LEYE -
+376
' -ft N L. -
+363.5
--
LOWER- LEVELjI
+351 l
-- _ T.O _ROOF —
+381 ll
_ MAIN LEVEL_N
+363.5
_ LowER LEVEL s6_
+351
NORTH •O•
WOO FASCIA AM GSM
GUTTER POINTED WHITE • •.
ASPHALT SHWrLE -- -
-- .> 4ASTER .�► —.re
F.1 ia}' MAZING IN
02 RASTER - COLOR 3
EAST CLASSROOM WING — EAST ELEVATION
N SCALE .L
3l 0
es�8 +5p
0 16 q...JJJ
SCALE 7
8 32
NOTE: SEE SHEET M -1 FOR MMILRWS COLORS AND FINISHES
CSDA
ARCHITECTS
Cww SMem ! umo k&ADCK 1-
120 Mw4mwry Street Suite 1170
Son Finaiew. CA "I"
415x�3311100
415.693.9830
CONSULTANT
ARCHITECT STAMP
Nft110RITY APPROVAL
PROJECT ADDRESS
ST. ANDREW'S
PARISH do SCHOOL
PLAN. DEPT.
SUBMITTAL
13601 SARATOGA AVE.
SARATOGA. CA 95070
mw.
DATE
oma wr :
DRAIN
BY:
cHn er
CSM ARCHITECTS 200.1
SHEET TIRE
ADMIN. /
CLASSROOM —
NORTH CLASSROOM
WING ELEVATIONS
SrJ�
Varm +x mw i�si.oi
A3.2
.
W00D FASCIA AND GSM
GUTTER PLAITED WHITE
ASPHALT SHINGLE
8' WOOD SIDING
- COLOR 11
OPERABLE LOW 'E' DOUBLE
s GLAZING N BRONZE
-� - ANUULZED FRA E TEXTURED CEMENT
PLASTER - COLOR 13
FINISH REDWOOD BFJVr'M
1 PARISH CENTER — EAST ELEVATION
SCALE 1 /16' -1.4'
WOOD FASCIA AND GSM
GUTTER PAINTED WARE —
ASPHALT SHNGLE
B' WOOD SIDING
COLOR 11
•'•�', s OPERABLE LOW 'E' DOUBLE
GAZING IN BRONZE
L - — ANODIZED FRAME
ronuRED CEMENT
"C •'Tf, ''IATJ :_.tt PIASTER - COIXt 13
7 PARISH CENTER — WEST ELEVATION
SCALE I /16-IT'
T.O. I
+383
L'l3i•ast'5�PL Se�.r�w•lx•SiJ• - 1:fl.�F L'ryr L*Pf' "j MAIN FEVEL
+363
0 PARISH CENTER — NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE 1/1611•4•
PARISH CENTER — SOUTH ELEVATION
6
SCALE 1 /16•-1'O•
r E
+363
— WOOD FASCIA AND GSM
GUTTER PANTED WHITE
— ASPHALT SHINGLE
Y WOOD SIDING
_cmw11
1
,z.
T.O.HIGH ROOF ..�
+396.5'
T.O. B0017 fit,
+392
PIASTER - COLOR 13
I OPERABLE LOW 'E' DOUBLE
GLAZING N BRONZE
ANODIZED FRAME
METAL WALKWAY ROOF TO MATCH SHINGLE COLOR
CLERGY OFFICES — WEST ELEVATION CLERGY OFFICES — SOUTH ELEVATION
5 SCALE Ine -1a 4 wuE L /1e -1a
CSDA
ARCHITE`-TS
CmIst %o•r & D•Vato Ar&aectb, Inm
120 Mmit m m SVftt. Salle I I"
San F nch=, CA 94104
d9iw4c9dmWi•e6.cam
415.693.9800
415.893.9830
CONSULTANT
ARCHITECT STAMP
74 fla a,
AUTHORITY APPROVAL
O.I
c�� ��•�1�'L���n' } ^�1�i'd H rn' - f■
�i■
*�
�
MAW: I
DATE: I
DESCRIPTION:
DRAWN
BY:
CH" BY:
CSOA ARCHITECTS 2003
SHEET TITLE
BELL TOWER,
CLERGY OFFICES,
PARISH CENTER
ELEVATIONS
ORIGINAL SCALE
I�.............. 11' .2'
D.-
:�rr�. ,3 x,3, .a1
SHEET
NUMBER: A3.3
�,1
H
IE ''ITNC- �i<3y■ y ref
d-"�
Qx
tfa ✓ O q��,�
I t!f_ -r �>a_. rl N• �';�fd
■.y?;
4....�
71. 16 . .'""." ■W ..
s`SiS
-r -
^•atcAV
. -•�-$7
�tfr
�— it n.�a.+$Nl:�', ,Z'';,3•..:
r ■ li/
'
�'N•�rrl�
err y xSTr�..��:.tr, �..>.
.
Ls,�
1) D■
�N
,L 1 ��.1
�:1iS1� J R7 ' � ' � 110
PIASTER - COLOR 13
I OPERABLE LOW 'E' DOUBLE
GLAZING N BRONZE
ANODIZED FRAME
METAL WALKWAY ROOF TO MATCH SHINGLE COLOR
CLERGY OFFICES — WEST ELEVATION CLERGY OFFICES — SOUTH ELEVATION
5 SCALE Ine -1a 4 wuE L /1e -1a
CSDA
ARCHITE`-TS
CmIst %o•r & D•Vato Ar&aectb, Inm
120 Mmit m m SVftt. Salle I I"
San F nch=, CA 94104
d9iw4c9dmWi•e6.cam
415.693.9800
415.893.9830
CONSULTANT
ARCHITECT STAMP
CONSULTANT STAMP
AUTHORITY APPROVAL
PROJECT ADDRESS
ST. ANDREW'S
PARISH do SCHOOL
PLAN. DEPT.
SUBMITTAL
13601 SARATOGA AVE.
SARATOGA, CA 95070
MAW: I
DATE: I
DESCRIPTION:
DRAWN
BY:
CH" BY:
CSOA ARCHITECTS 2003
SHEET TITLE
BELL TOWER,
CLERGY OFFICES,
PARISH CENTER
ELEVATIONS
ORIGINAL SCALE
I�.............. 11' .2'
D.-
:�rr�. ,3 x,3, .a1
SHEET
NUMBER: A3.3
A
Community Development Department
City of Saratoga
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, California 95070 .
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 14, 2007
TO: Heritage Preservation Commission
FROM: Heather Bradley, Contract Planner
SUBJECT: Determination of whether or not the existing home is historically significant.
Property Location:
18524 Montepere Way, Saratoga, California
Property APN:
389 -26 -022
Project Applicants:
Hari Sripadanna
Property Owners:
Hari Sripadanna
Project Summary
The applicant requests a determination from the HPC on the historical significance of the
existing residence. The owner is proposing a remodel and addition to the existing residence as
shown on the attached plans.
Historic Evaluation
The property is not currently listed on the City's Historic Resources Inventory. The home
appears to be of an Eichler like design and construction in a neighborhood of similarly designed
and built homes. Because of the potential historical significance of the structure staff requested
an historic evaluation of the residence. The applicant has secured the services of an
architectural historian to evaluate the property. The contents and results of the analysis have
been included as part of a DPR523L form and letter dated April 12, 2007 (attached to this
memorandum).
The evaluation concludes that the property is not significant for architectural reasons or by
association with historically significant people or events per Federal, State, and local criteria.
Any future alteration to the structure would therefore not cause an adverse impact to the
environment as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Decision by HPC
The applicant is requesting a determination of the HPC regarding the historical significance of
the structure. The following are options available to the Commission in reviewing this proposal:
Determine that the structure is not historically significant: . If the Commission
determines that the structures are not historically significant, the property would not be
listed on the Historic Resources Inventory. Proposed future alterations would not be
subject to HPC review.
2. Determine that the property /structure is historically significant and direct staff to
place the structure on the historical list: If the Commission determines that the
property /structure is historically significant:
HPC August 14, 2007 Meeting
Project Address: 18524 Montepere Way
Project Applicant: Hari Sripadanna
■ At least one (1) of the seven (7) criteria listed in the City code must be
selected to reflect the reasons why the structure is significant.
■ The HPC would need to determine that the proposed project either
meets or does not meet the Secretary of Interior Standards (Standards)
for historic properties. Suggestions to ensure compliance with the
Standards maybe provided.
■ Staff would place the property on the Historic Resources Inventory
and proposed future alterations to the structures would require HPC
review and would be required to meet Standards for historic
properties.
The seven Criteria are as follows (City Code §13- 15.010):
(a) It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the cultural, social, economic,
political, aesthetic, engineering or architectural history of the City, the County, the
State or the nation; or
(b) It is identified with persons or events significant in local, county, state or
national history; or
(c) It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period or method of
construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials; or
(d) It is representative of the notable design or craft of a builder, designer, or
architect; or
(e) It embodies or contributes to unique physical characteristics representing an
established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or district within the City;
or
(f) It represents a significant concentration or continuity of site, buildings,
structures or objects, unified by past events or aesthetically by plan or physical or
natural development; or
(g) It embodies or contributes to a unique natural setting or environment
constituting a distinct area or district within the City having special character or
special historical, architectural or aesthetic interest or value.
Attachments
(1) DPR 523L Form, completed by Archives & Architecture, dated April 11,2007
(2) Letter from Archives and Architecture, dated April 12, 2007
(3) Plans" Exhibit A"
Memorandum to the Saratoga Historic Preservation Commission Page 2
b.
4
A
A Q C H I V E 5 & A Q C H I T E C T U Q E
HERITAGE RESOURCE PARTNERS
PO Box 1332
San Jose CA 95109
408.369 -5683
408.228 -0762 /fax
April 12, 2007
Hari Sripadanna and Sasi Murhty
18524 Montpere Way p
Saratoga CA 95070 JUL 2 3 2001
RE: 18524 Montpere Way, Saratoga (APN: 389 -26 -022)
Historical and architectural evaluation CITY I Y DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Dear Hari and Sasi:
Please find attached completed historic property recordation forms (DPR523), prepared for the
property located at 18524 Montpere Way, Saratoga, California. The forms were prepared for your
use and submittal to the City of Saratoga in conjunction with your application for a remodeling
permit for your home.
This letter and the attached forms constitutes an historical and architectural evaluation of the
property, based on the significance statement made within the above referenced DPR523, pursuant
to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) —
Preliminary Review of Projects and Conduct of Initial Study.
For the purposes of CEQA, the City of Saratoga is required to consider historical significance if a
property meets the criteria for listing on the California Register. Generally, properties that are at
least 50 years old are considered historic and require some level of evaluation by the agency.
The attached DPR523 forms dated April 11, 2007, which we prepared, documents the historical and
architectural aspects of the property at 18524 Montpere Way, Saratoga. The house was built 1954-
1955 based on the County of Santa Clara building permit for the property and other property
records. The original owners /occupants were James and Dorothy Hurt. They purchased the house
and property from California Pacific Title Insurance Co. - the developer of the Peremont Tract.
The property has not been previously surveyed for or recorded on any local, state, or national
registers. We indicated within the DPR523 forms that the property appears not to qualify for listing
on the California or National Registers.
We also considered the property in light of the criteria for consideration as a locally designated
landmark. Chapter 13 of the City of Saratoga Municipal Code outlines criteria and procedures for
local designation. For a property to qualify, it must satisfy any two or more of the criteria listed
A Q c' II I V f: 6 0 A R C II I T t C r II 0 r.
below and retain a substantial degree of architectural and structural integrity with respect to the
original design:
(a) It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic,
engineering or architectural history of the City, the County, the State or the nation; or
(b) It is identified with persons or events significant in local, county, state or national history; or
(c) It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period or method of construction, or is a
valuable example of the use of indigenous materials; or
(d) It is representative of the notable design or craft of a builder, designer, or architect; or
(e) It embodies or contributes to unique physical characteristics representing an established and
familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or district within the City; or
(f) It represents a significant concentration or continuity of site, buildings, structures or objects,
unified by past events or aesthetically by plan or physical or natural development; or
(g) It embodies or contributes to a unique natural setting or environment constituting a distinct area
or district within the City having special character or special historical, architectural or aesthetic
interest or value.
Although the building retains a substantial degree of architectural and structural integrity, it does not
appear to qualify for local landmark status, as it does not individually exemplify special architectural
elements and/ or distinctive character, and although possibly representative of an important design
firm, is not a notable example of their work. Lastly the property is not identified with persons of
significance.
We believe that development of this property, to include alterations to the extant building, would not
appear to cause an adverse impact to the environment as defined by CEQA, because the property is
not historically significant according to the minimum requirements for listing on the California
Register of Historical Resources, nor is it individually eligible for designation as a local historic
landmark.
Sincerely,
ranklin Maggi, Architectu a] Historian
Page 2
Page 1 of 13 *Resource Name or M (Assigned by recorder) Hurt House
P7. Other Identifier: None
*P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted 'a. County Santa Clara
and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5' Quad San Jose West Date 180 photo revised T .7S ; R .1W; Mount Diablo B.M.
c. Address 18524 Montpere Way City Saratoga Zip 95070
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and /or linear resources) Zone 10S; 589130 mE/ 4124 986 mN
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)
Assessor's Parcel Number: 389 -26 -022,
Montpere Way between Allendale Avenue and Quito Road.
*P3a Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)
This one -story residence is a form of Modern residential design known in the San Francisco
Bay Area as an "Eichler "; however, this house is not a part of one of the Eichler tract
developments found throughout the region. It appears, but has not been substantiated, that
the architects of this house and the surrounding subdivision were Anshen and Allen, who did
work regularly with tract builder Joseph Eichler in the 1950s, designing many homes in his
mid - century subdivisions. The house is a compact and modest representation of the mid - century
Modern residential style, known for its low -slope roofs, slab foundations, large areas of
glass, and walls and windows configured to provide an indoor /outdoor connection fitting for
the California environment.
(Continued on page 2, DPR523L)
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 . Single family property
*P4 Resources Present: ® Building ❑ Structure ❑ Object ❑ Site ❑ District ❑ Element of District ❑ Other (Isolates, etc.)
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none ".)
None
PSb. Description of Photo: (View, date,
accession #)
View from street facing
southwest, April 2007.
*P6. Date Constructed /Age and Sources:
® Historic ❑ Prehistoric ❑ Both
Constructed 1954 -1955,
permit, 55 years old.
*P7. Owner and Address:
Bhagavan Sripadanna &
Sasi K Murthy
18524 Montpere Way
Saratoga, CA 95070
*P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, and
address)
F.Maggi, L.Dill, J.Kusz
Archives & Architecture
PO Box 1332
San Jose CA 95109 -1332
*P9. Date Recorded: 4 / 11 / 0 7
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
Intensive
*Attachments: ❑ NONE ® Location Map ❑ Sketch Map ® Continuation Sheet ® Building, Structure and Object Record ❑ Archaeological Record
❑ District Record ❑ Linear Feature Record ❑ Milling State Record ❑ Rock Art Record ❑ Artifact Record ❑ Photograph Record ❑ Other (List)
DPR 523A . * Required information
Page 2 of 13 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Hurt House
*Recorded by F. Maggi, L. Dill, & J. Kusz *Date April 11, 2007 ® Continuation ❑ Update
(Continued from previous page, DPR523a, Pia)
The residence is located on a cul -de -sac within a subdivision featuring a selection of
similar house designs; they are all simple in form, consisting of asymmetrical gabled roofs
over rectangular footprints that integrate carports or garages. The roughly wedge- shaped
tract is bounded by Quito Road, Allendale Avenue, and Varona Creek, near Wildcat Creek. Many
of the rectangular houses in the area are parallel with the street frontage, but some are
also set, as is the subject house, with a narrow fagade facing the street. The area has many
mature trees, and the setting is designed to be informal, including a curved street and cul-
de -sac that feature sloped gutters and no sidewalks. About a quarter of the surrounding
residences have been altered significantly (e.g., full siding replacement, new windows,
and /or roof -pitch changes); of the remaining more - original houses, about half have undergone
some alteration, including enclosure of car ports, minor window changes, and less- extensive
additions.
The subject lot is narrow at the street frontage (northeast) and wedges out to the southeast
side and southwest rear. The house is parallel with, and near to, the northwest property
line. The side yard opens wide to the southeast; this area is fenced off from the front yard,
creating a large private space. The portion of the site to the southwest of the house is
landscaped in part as a patio, opening from the center of the house. The patio curves outward
with red - stained concrete sections separated by reveals, with no imbedded formwork. Large
trees follow the southeast property line, primarily on the neighboring parcels, and the patio
area includes lawn areas and small trees and shrubs. The rear yard is shaded, is currently
unplanted, and has no designed interaction with the house. The front yard includes a lawn
area next to the concrete driveway, and a row of evergreens along each side property line.
Although the footprint of the house is a rectangle, the open carport is recessed into that
space, creating an "L "- shaped living space.
The plan is ordered along a center hallway that acts as the spine of the house. Bedrooms
flank the "hallway on both sides, and in the center of the plan, the kitchen /living room space
is open across the width of the house. A recessed two -car carport occupies the east corner of
the house; square posts wrapped in wood trim support the roof beams at this location. Entry
is from the north side; a series of cast -in -pace rectangular concrete stepping stones lead
from the driveway to the entrance. The front door is flush, with a single, textured -glass
sidelight. Opposite from the main entry is a garden entry. This doorway is recessed into the
house slightly; it is flanked on one side by the red brick chimney. A single door opens into
the carport as well.
The house has an asymmetrical gable roof above its simple footprint. The southern slope is at
a lower pitch and longer than the northern slope. The roof is carried on four large beams at
the front fagade; one beam supports the ridge; one beam is at the north side wall; a third
beam - -set very low -- supports the outer eave along the carport, and the fourth is set centered
within the longer roof, between the parking spaces. The beams cantilever forward, flush with
the rake edge of the roof. At the rear of the house, there are also four exposed beams, but
these are set in a different configuration. There is a ridge beam, two wall beams, and a beam
set at the centerline of the wall, near the ridge under the longer roof slope. The roof has
no apparent rafters; instead, the roofing is carried on a pattern of structural 2x board -and-
batten decking. The decking is exposed continuously from the eaves into the interior
ceilings. The spacing between the boards is approximately the same size as the battens. An
angled outer frieze board conceals an integral metal gutter along the edge of the tar -and-
gravel roof.
(Continued on next page, DPR523L)
DPR523L * Required information
Page 3 of 13 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Hurt House
*Recorded by F. Maggi, L. Dill, & J. Kusz *Date April 11, 2007 ® Continuation ❑ Update
(Continued from previous page)
The envelope of the house is a composition of sections of siding that alternate with full -
height window bays. In some places, the wood- framed window sash are full- height; in other
places the windows top stucco lower panels. The windows are all fixed sash, and ventilation
is provided by narrow, full- height vertical screened openings with internal shutters. The
solid shutters are decorated with an exterior pattern that looks similar to a louver, but
they open as a single unit on hinges, like a door. The siding consists of vertical boards
with a board - and - batten pattern; each board has three narrow bands separated by thin reveals.
The siding is continuous from the exterior walls into the interior, creating a visual
connection between indoors and out.
The northwest wall has no overriding design pattern; instead, a long series of the higher
windows alternates with the narrow, full- height screen openings and wider wood siding
sections along a single plane. The front door and its sidelight create the only interruption
along this fagade; they are in line with the rest of the wall, without any eave changes or
other features to distinguish their location; the door is set relatively far from the front
of the parcel.
The southeast wall has a roughly symmetrical form, centered about a very wide recessed area.
The majority of the center wall is set back beneath a deep eave and centers on the wide, red-
brick chimney. The south corner steps out in plan; this area has only shallow eaves. The
north side of the fagade also steps out at the carport, where the eaves are almost non-
existent. The corner of the carport adjacent to the house includes a storage shed with doors
made of matching siding; this storage area creates a solid form at the end the recessed area.
A portion of this wall has a pattern of three, wide, full- height windows separated by three
narrow, full- height ventilation openings; a sided area creates the solid wall adjacent to the
recessed area. Within the recess, next to the chimney, is a symmetrical pattern, centered
about a simple flush door. Each side of the door features a pair of full- height windows that
flank a single ventilation opening. On the other side of the chimney, under the deep eaves,
is a symmetrical composition of three wide full- height windows separated by a pair of
ventilation openings.
Facing the street, the front fagade is narrow, under the shorter length of roof. The carport
is recessed under the other length of roof. Near the corner of the wall is a vertical
ventilation opening and a full- height, narrow decorative -glass window.
The rear fagade is clad in the vertical wood siding, unbroken by windows, but with a pair of
the narrow, full- height ventilation openings at the center of the wall.
Interiors: The interior of the house reflects many of the same details as the exterior. Such
finishes as the ceilings and walls are continuous with the exterior materials. Such details
as the high interior wall glazing accentuate the form of the residence. The kitchen and
bathrooms have been altered, and the parquet floor is not likely original.
Integrity and character - defining features
The property maintains adequate historic integrity as per the National Register's seven
aspects of integrity. It maintains its original location in the post -War suburban
neighborhood that became part of Saratoga shortly after its development; it is still
surrounded by most of its historic residential setting, including surrounding houses of
similar scale and design and mature trees. It retains its mid - twentieth - century residential
scale and feeling and continues, through its form, massing and detailing, to illustrate its
associations with patterns of development in the South Bay Area. The building has integrity
with its Modern design, including its low, asymmetrical roof form and its repetitive patterns
of fenestration and ventilation.
Page 4 of 13 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Hurt House
*Map Name: USGS San Jose west / Cupertino *Scale: n. t. s . *Date of Map: 1980 photo revised
DPR523J * Required information
Page 5 of 13
*NRHP Status Code 6z
*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder)
B1. Historic Name: James and Dorothy Hurt House
62. Common Name: None
B3. Original use: Single family residential B4. Present Use: Single family residential
*B5. Architectural Style: Modern
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations)
Constructed 1954 -1955 in Santa Clara County, building permit #39324 issued to Viola Lumber
Company.
*B7. Moved? ® No ❑ Yes ❑Unknown Date: n/a Original Location: n/a
*B6. Related Features:
None.
B9a Architect: Anshen and Allen (prob.) b. Builder: Viola Lumber Company
*B10. Significance: Theme Architecture and Shelter Area Saratoga
Period of Significance 1955 Property Type Residential Applicable Criteria None
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)
This single - family residence was built on Lot 19 of Peremont Tract Unit 2. This second phase of
a three -phase 79 -lot residential subdivision was recorded on May 25, 1954, and a building permit
issued by the County of Santa Clara on Sept. 13, 1954. The building permits were obtained by
Viola Lumber Company, who appears to have acted as the General Contractor for the project as
well as for the first unit. In late 1955, the house at 18524 Montpere Way, located on a short
cul -de -sac along this through street, was owned and occupied by James E. and Dorothy J. Hurt (OR
3365:437 12/20/1955). They bought the property from California Pacific Title Insurance Co. James
was an engineer at Lockheed Industries at that time. The Hurts were residents until at least the
late 1970s. Subsequent to their residency, the property changed ownership at least five times
until acquired by the present owners in 2006.
The Peremont Tracts were developed by George Myran and B. M. Blanchard of California Pacific
Title Insurance Company. The first unit consisted of 14 lots along Quito Road and Allendale
Avenue, and went on the market sometime in 1954. The second unit included completion of Montpere
Way and included 24 additional lots, filling in the area between the first unit and Varona Creek
(the confluence of Vasona and Sobey Creeks).
(Continued on next page, DPR523L)
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) None
*B12. References:
Ditto, J. Design for Living Eichler Homes, 1995.
Polk Directories, Los Gatos and Saratoga.
Santa Clara County Recorder - maps, official records
Santa Clara County building permits.
Sunset Magazine, June 1956 (Vol. 116).
www.anshen.com
www.digital.lib.washington.edu
www.eichlernetwork.com
B13. Remarks: Proposed addition
*B14. Evaluator: Franklin Maggi
*Date of Evaluation: April 11, 2007
(This space reserved for official comments.)
DPR 523B
- ri
br3•' �a 3 �4
� •r� w
...PL
�Kr..t xr
�4
@c
� •c D-11 Jr as h t
t � b• T
.,.,� d'' , '41.1 w ►»..
x " -• �;�ef u a �
m M 4 ±
IV CP
3
t- t
* Required information
Page 6 of 13 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Hurt House
*Recorded by F. Maggi, L. Dill, & J. Kusz *Date April 11, 2007 ® Continuation ❑ Update
(Continued from previous page, DPR523b, B10)
The third unit was consisted of 41 lots north of Varona Creek at its confluence with Wildcat
Creek, and included the construction of Harleigh Drive and Perego Way, a cul -de -sac. This
last unit appears to have been developed after Saratoga's incorporation as a city, and the
style by then had been changed to California Ranch.
The first two units of Peremont appear to have been designed by the architectural firm of
Anshen and Allen, based on the style and detailing of the houses. Confirmation could not be
obtained, as the drawings are not presently available in the public record. Anshen & Allen
formed as a partnership between S. Robert Anshen (1910- 1964), and William Stephen Allen
(1912 -1992) who began their practice together in San Francisco in 1939 after their
graduations from the University of Pennsylvania. As an architectural firm in mid - century
California, they completed a variety of buildings, although the bulk of their work was in
residential construction. Early published buildings include the Chapel of the Holy Cross in
Sedona, AZ (1956) and Dinosaur National Monument Visitor Center in Utah (1957). Later works
include Research and Engineering Center for FMC in Santa Clara (1961) and the Science and
Laboratory Building for the University of California, Santa Cruz (1964).
In 1949, Joseph Eichler collaborated with Robert Anshen as the architect for Eichler Homes in
the South Bay area for the Sunnyvale Manor Addition. Eichler had lived in a rented Frank
Lloyd Wright designed Usonian house, the Bazett -Frank house in Hillsborough, and along with
Anshen, was inspired early on by the modernist designs of Wright. Although Eichler had the
concept of mass - produced high - quality homes, he enlisted the talent of an architect to fully
realize this vision. Anshen & Allen developed Eichler's concept with the use of post- and -beam
construction which allowed for quick construction and was also flexible enough to be able to
provide individual designs when necessary.
In 1953, a rift developed between Anshen and Eicher at which time Eichler retained Quincy A.
Jones & Frederick Emmons to work as the architect for Eichler Homes. It is during this time,
in late 1953 and early 1954, that the Peremont Tract was developed by Myran and Blanchard.
The dispute with Eichler was short - lived, and eventually both architectural firms were
working concurrently on residential design for the company. Anshen & Allen would go on to
create houses for other subdivisions as well. By 1962, Anshen & Allen had completed the
design for over 3,000 houses in the Bay Area.
EVALUATION
The houses in the Peremont Tract are similar in design to Anshen & Allen designed residential
developments that first appeared in the early 1950s in the South Bay area. This house design,
constructed elsewhere for builders Joseph Eichler and Elmer Gavello won Merit Awards in
Sunset Magazine's summer issue in 1956 (Vol. 116). Many of these housing tracts remain as
distinct reminders of trends in modern architecture during Santa Clara Valley's period of
industrialization and urbanization following World War II. While they have historical
significance as groupings - reflecting patterns of development and architectural innovation -
buildings such as the Hurt House are not individually distinctive in a way that would enable
eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places or the California Register of
Historical Resources as individual resources. In some local communities, these tracts, when
found to have a high level of artistic merit and integrity to their original designs, have
been found to qualify for designation as local historic districts. Within the Peremont
Tracts, changes to the original building fabric associated with the 1954 -1955 period of
construction have already reduced the integrity of the subdivision to a level that would
limit the ability to establish the grouping as being eligible for the California Register as
a historic district. Due to this reduced integrity, the lack of distinction of the Hurt House
as an individual property, and the inability to association the property with persons who
have made important contributions as individuals to the community, it would appear that the
property would not be eligible for the National or California Registers under any of the
applicable criteria.
DPR 523L * Required information
State of California — The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
rage i of 13 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Hurt House
*Recorded by F. Maggi, L. Dill, & J. Kusz *Date April 11, 2007 ® Continuation ❑ Update
Side entry yard, viewed facing southwest.
DPR 523L * Required information
State of California — The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
Page 8 of 13 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Hurt House
*Recorded by F. Maggi, L. Dill, & J. Kusz *Date April 11, 2007 ® Continuation ❑ Update
Main entry door at side yard, view facing south.
DPR 523L
* Required information
State of California — The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
Page 9 of 13 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Hurt House
*Recorded by F. Maggi, L. Dill, & J. Kusz *Date April 11, 7.007 Continuation ❑ Update
Side yard showing northwest elevation, viewed from rear yard facing northeast.
i
DPR 523L Required information
State of California — The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
Page 10 of 13 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Hurt House
*Recorded by F. Maggi, J. Kusz, & L. Dill *Date April 11, 2007 ® Continuation ❑ Update
Detail of entry to patio area, view facing north.
DPR523L * Required information
State of California — The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
Page 11 of 13 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Hurt House
*Recorded by F. Maggi, J. Kusz, & L. Dill *Date April 11, 2007 ® Continuation ❑ Update
Rear of building at south corner, view facing west.
DPR 523L * Required information
State of California — The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
Page 12 of 13 *Resource Name or# (Assigned by recorder) Hurt House
*Recorded by F. Maggi, J. Kusz, & L. Dill *Date April 11, 2007 ® Continuation ❑ Update
Rear elevation, view facing northeast.
DPR 523L
* Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
Page 13 of 13 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Hurt House
*Recorded by F. Maggi, J. Kusz, & L. Dill *Date April 11, 2007 ® Continuation ❑ Update
Detail of eave at rear elevation, view facing north.
DPR 523L * Required information
8
GENERALNOTES
L EOSTIN0 C016TRAONN DATA SIOM ON PE DRAWINGS WAS ORTAM FROM ZAIRE "A""" TE CORTACNR WW1 VE1MY
Dwm CTIIDRIUI6 AAN 90LL NORM TIE ARO6TEM W ALL OREPIORS E3ORE PIgMM WITN TE `DW`
2 SEE ARD.TOMPOL OAWWWS FOR LAYOUT D&VMN6 NO DEMRONS FIIDEPf RIDE RNIGTED oOUNW
1 Al OSCEPIALES ETWELI DRAWINGS 91N1 E C1MiED — TIME ARCww POOR A PROCODNO wnt ■ONC
♦. M lE EVEM TAT CERTAN FEVUCS OF THE CONSDIMDOR ARE NOT RALT SIORI OR DETM M THE oNIIIID2 OR CAIIID FOR
N TE MNERAL NOTES, THEW TIER 00,011 ROW WRLL E OF 1w SRI[ CpAww" AS SWRAR calpTlOa TAT Ww 91DRN OR
omit TEL
S DAU9ORS ETEMRR6 AN OmTRO CONNIIp6 9011 E OEOED AO VIBE, OR TIRE JOB SITE RE EVER CONTRN. SL OF40M
EamorR3
OR D6ETE`NEES SAIL E REPORTED 10>E 1ftM T EFOE WORK EW6 OR WPRFS ARE ORDERED. ABBREVIATIONS
aECiTA - IEOOMFM- FRE MART, tEIERIDIE A D 91eM1r ROXWBVM ETEE LESTRILn" 9`m
7. WOR( 9ML E POFORm N COfORWNE WITH RAM, COUNTY, STAR[ AO FEDERAL CODES VMS AD RFSTwTOl6 A'RlAdE
ro TIE WOK KUSRc MR TREE R, AND NOT CWC PMTS I TNPDUDI S • AT FAG FKE OF COB'ARE
0. COMiACTalt 9N11 OISI¢lEOF ALL IE]QAED AO/ OR ELON9ED Auum. RASR MO DEBf� wsED SLY REWC A Br FAR. FILE OF RBI
100059E FAR. FACE OF FtTW00•
DEOEFS FA FKE E SRN
9. ANr TINT DONTREO ro E OELI0119ED. MLFD.FD OR BOOGIED a ro E COIPLF1FLr REIIO.ID, RNx1ANG M INr WrtD ro AAr . OR DA DMIETER OR 8090 R. FOOT
CQVOMm ITFLa (PPES. DAM FRAARIIG, BEAM FASTNNUM ETC)- ALL DOa R/ N A DOOEa11ED AREA MAT COST E RERONFD (E) DOSING RAW. FLAVOR O
N ORDER ro WINIAW COWPAW SEl E DOE W AT NOT LESSER N EALRY TZAR EXETRO AO AT M ADDDNAL LOST. ANI F00T/FEET E. GMLE
AREA W DEADIONN OR feE 9WL WE lER M A COIPIEIElI FWBICU COOITNW 901/91DES GEY. EL1•RB3D _
IM REWNRO amRO NN PAJ W THE CONTWIDR WALL E RE"ISKE FOR ALL CUTTM AN PATDaN RTTN ECVN FOR 4M) P GI9ffi ND'P9al ON
PROPER NSTAIATxO OF ANTERA S NO EXWMDff AND FOR PROIEnM OF ADFENr CM61MX110l CATTALO AO RENO.0 OF /L/W6 118 RIDE B
DOSTNG STR1CTUI AL Wl RDOR AID ROOF ROME 6 PROi9TED ABESS VECFIED OR TIRE PLA � AR010" A S R A.T. HMO
AB. DOR BET T IiD. If�l
AG ASPWLIIC N nLDOR
11. WOO( RNIDTm AS OREA FtX=I DNTRALTDR ISTNIFD• (DE.G.) 9WL IEEE ALL APRJDA9E CDOES AIO RpT. WOR AFS. MpE M C FLOOR M G
REOAECONR R611GlED RITIWA IIEESE oaaAERTS ArID S1WL E NSU AN ALLY OPERADO1AL PWDR TO FIN. APRIOWE AN
ODD,FAVRT OF Ns Pel=,- R BOARD 1-1). LAEO1 ME 0, Ba BUTTOR OF Ix LEFT IMN
BDS. BOROY OF FORK IAL 10110WN
am MEDK W.S. MOWE BOLT
!R 9DDR MOL EOYIICAL
NAG RDCKK ET. law
BS Wont SALES 1RR WAIRFAcrum
CAI C40U IN. LNRIRaU1
CA CRl DRAIROZ MSL 11amIN4p15
CDL CODNF WTa MOUNTED
EE CEROC WA NOT APRIwHE
Ut-L CD"TALTpi F1UeWSAD MK OOT N COMMCT
CORIRLTOR WSIAI1ED ALTS r9f ro sM
oO/ E L u CAST " D N CENTER
LEGEND AND SYMBOLS u CoNiIDE Aa
CoNn F11RblIED
DOL CDERO OWNIUR CMRI SH Ml1ID
a& MOSET G OE.Ol ONALi FT1NlaIED
4 Cla 0.091 OPMOA MSTAIID
\ /,Norr \th � CO�UAR OPP. OPPOSITE AND
I MEIINA101p1Y DMA COXCPFIE YASVAWT LwIT PAV. 'LATE
5+.N PAWL NIRDAWE
Ow- ARROW R OF RM UENO • CONTROL PONT R RATE
)FROM IAAGiES TORE NORTH AFF. OR WORN PANT LDML CONMFCENN P.IAY RASTIC LWWA1E
OR GTW PaNf CdAf. CONTINJEIS RUMS. ROWAMG
CIWE C0111DORW79R RYWD. RnN70O
CTE CENTER P.DC PDNT OF COFINEM"
4.01 IaT'11aTE NDIIER CNW COD RATER WAD. RAAR15
WIAIDNON9YATiOR ORL DOLS E R0. /OA ROOF DRWO10 10W DAMN
DEMO. DEMODON WET. REFORICE
1 SHOED TRIAADF NO m ET. ETAL ER- RAREJWOR
A5.0 MEN gIECIIDN DLA DPAETA RED. IEOIIRED
4.01 •NIWDEI NTXOR DLL DNENSIDN WHYS ROUW "FAD IAACHNE SCREW
Dom. DISPEJ6ER RHSWS. REIND HEAD 911E ETA 9:REW
DL DOOR LOL ER I, ROOWD "FM WOOD SCREW
RIELM•>iY1fON DN DOWN RW.L RM WATER LEADER
D. DOOR SLo SEE 04 DAMRRS
b.0 DOME
1.0 911E MEREEAE EC110N110N PAWN 4.01 PANT NEY SYNBfR M• CRAWL` CINN
If SLR. SE
6
WANED TAVNLEE NDGTES NEYt EA El SID SEE ELECRNK DRMNGS
DIECTON E.A DOABION ANT SF SOLLA"E FOOTAGE
FLEC OECTRIGL SIR. SHEET
Em. ELEVATIDII 9W WARM
RIADDITRINCLE%R AES Q YMWIeTnE EC EOOL SIN SEE WELNADGL OPANTOS
TW SD IRWOSI EKED E.T EIXE OF SPV SEE �WADHG DRAWINGS
b. IE SERIFS CONSIDERED E.R. ENN OF SLAB
IDEG SPELNIGTIW
EIEMTIEeN WORRKJ,i1011 EAT. AM SEE
ETDEA 55 SEE D
STm
SLEET MERE F]EW1ON 6 °PALM! FA FRE W SSU STRUCNRAL DRAWPNS
F.D. nDOR °PAN STL STANOA9D
•Bna CALaAf 11 FTIRIGTION m Sim
i FE. FLAT I ROLM SA S'1R
1� mosIx AW.O SECrIDN RENTEKAINN Fu NC MT HEAD WOOD) S SEEM TA TOP OF CURB
t
FACE OF STU 6 ro SLEET NHUE DETAA 6 mIRN FORS MT "FAD WOOD 5AEI
ALE OF SEW III. ne. R`R METAL SLEET ErAL. 5CE11 T.a TOP OF
LLAR Fll FA(X i.oA TOP OF LIRA /T/70P O
Fa FILE O taP. TOP OF PARAPET/70P OF RAZE
SITE PLAN WITH ALLOWABLE SETBACKS INDICATED
136• -7 I/2'
REMODEL & ADDITION TO
SRIPADANNA RESIDENCE
18524, MONTPERE WAY, SARATOGA, CA 95070
ZONNING REGULATIONS OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY
T16 SITE LOT 5 A LE6MLY NEFGVA9YO SITE AS OS ER AE AND Wont ARE LESS D1A1 TIE ALLOWED DRE76106
T.OwS. TOP OF srE OR o, SLAB
W NIRORL WE SRIIOL 13 -I20ED w R-1 pMrfcl
04GRAN
TaE TO' OF
SITE FRONTAGE ALLOWED .Sod.
YONiR7E MY. WS6 G
TPA TOLET PARR OS"aw
TS TIDE STEEL
EASM SiIE moN1ADE . 3r 11
Tl (405) 296 DT OR
iSTFLR
T.Y. 10D6IDN
TYP. ^"�
SITE WIOIH ALLOWED = W-4'
� a
L051.N SITE .NR . W -9. 4Aem pFr Mmbi9el cea Seder 15 -066]0 RETEIEICrD ElA M ALSO SDE
PROJECT INFORMATION
DM TNFSS O OpA6E IOIFp
U LESS
oREI1WOIa wlmw.
_ _ _ AND IROWIING
VLF. SEI6Y N FF1D
Intl
_
R b 1M 1T6� a a PEA
�
■G IROER OtsEf
110 ROOD
ems% 6eleee+ IM frmt Rrr. o. i tlw. i m �a M br a IM 0
bl Rr• m0eq �� a it.
TE 0ID MEROW SPAM MTM DE �W WHE SEMAD . FLOOR AAEk MO NDOIiS 10
AN FATNC ylaE FAYEY DREIIUO.
ROW W14"
R/0 WDIw
SITE SIDE YARD SE18AO6 ARE CALWATTD BAWD ON TIE M9.ara CODE SEC TON •,5- 65.,60 Nonni t—N, .ln•
'_�S � i : �-�
■JL 'WATER SEATER
WP. RATER PROOF
REAEREWED BELOW.
OWNERS ARE : BO24 MTRAPERE /w I�Ork CA '95011
II1G WOOD ROATRRTE OF OEIFOReA
'A b-* CeeW aRe Nwe9 m ono, riel"R9e. wdlll > 6ef6N bWI •AWI NF nwirnmW ReeoaeC b O5+ CitriE in
NA
WS EK11ER S1TEMC
Midi RN ib b bole! mw I. �We6 W 0 PMOiHd R mrdl a �. MA /Re M W je w a ala .egWlbno to
EESINO USE
R ' S T : f WARbCOf
ReW BODED RRE IE91
LM aelFit w Mid Me W 'R b d i —w Rti Nlee'ef
(o) WNRe ft .MM a e eft Cow oa m .RA the dwdWd EM b d*4 IN nWiFwen eiM a bhry i0a
20MG OUSE : R- 1 -IQOOq 9MF iA1LT R9p1/T0l
IR OF Al SFMLTIWES : WI6MR.TED 1WIS -1 51 1NBS
wWmi Ms br FYa rteore ehdl Mr M I.. 5wl Len >.
a� M �
512E OF LOT: MA SOFT.
and 5W nW:11Wn .l6.1 a m e.eiW. ia. W I ReW 1w Bid 4W die tlwlWAw
II— Rim bm
FLOOR AREA SW - LOAM . 24W s4 R. PLUS 160 5a R. FOR EVERT
PMxWIW a 1M MAN a ITT m a Re— I.L aidlnWI M weebw W. — Nor wRARrA orw for iN.b. orA
WErR E AREA A
1,000 SAI R OO LET 511E MG OVEA 5,000 SQ. R.
vbiv bb NWU a w.re ®! m o06ROM Rw ML•
NLOWARE RDOL AREA = 3.040 SII R
POOR AREA E STRLCILE5 : w Tn. FLOOR: Iw SOFT.
SET BACK TABLE
SETBAG(
ENSTI G
REQUIRED
PROPOSED
1 ST FLR
2ND FLR
13TFLR
2NDFLR
iSTFLR
2ND FLR
FRONT
25'-0•
NA
25'-0'
25'-0•
25' -0•
NA
SIDE
7' -0• (MIN)
NA
6' -1(Y
11'-10'
7' -0• (E)
NA
REAR
25' -10'
NA
25' -0'
1 35' -0'
I 25.10•
NA
SITE DIMENSIONS (LEGAL NON CONFIRMIN
PART
'ROPE)
PERSPECTIVE VIEW
I 1 I IL
-p.
PRD'un" 11E — ( t I 75-0' "-•`'°'.s'= ..ice.. �:i. ` '
WA�L�10 BE 0�(IEDOII B E%IS71NG =..a L-1
•LSE 32. _
W
{
W sET
r
II .
\ 7 "
North
I SCALE 1/B' =1'4•
LME
PROPOSED IDOTON : 60.5+615.1]03 SOFT.
TOTAL FLOOR AREA IFTa<W A PROPOSEDI-06141615+5151-2237 Son
TOOL IDIOR W WENRA WALLS . 225 R.
LWDI OF EIIIFIEIOR WL TO E RDgED . 101 R. (LESS DON RATE OF DISTIC)
SMTRUC
SIRORA¢ "' I '
A39 Sa R. SIT•ARUE. 7952 ft"". (bWCn Gav9e)
CAPWT . '13 SO R.
PARDSY 2J SO. R 0WS[WT W SIN R.
PATIOS I,nTI Sa R PAIN 957 9a R. (mrrorete pvse]
TOTALS . 6 SR Ft WA9NAK M Wart
roTM COAADE . ; %9 5a R. IOTM CO'IERACE . ♦491 SA R.
PERIF/R OF SIR COIL E - 4855; PERCENT OF PROPOSED SITE COVERAGE . S2Tx
ALDWABLE OME9ILE
AVERAGE SLOPE ON SITE : IA.WR
ww NrODMDOR : LOWEST ELEATNN R AT RDG EDGE : 25761
HDONEST ELEMTRWI R A BLDG EDE : 252.91•
M90LE ar ATIM R : 25269'
TOP WOST OLYAIIDN POM W SRULIORE : 275.00•
NFYI FEET OF TOTAL 22F- " (D WALLS
LS
I Is-o- (D EXTEINOR WALLS ro E DETOL1S,0 < sox (E)
PROPOSED SEDAMS FOR FAaf a SELOO STORY SEE ADLAINT SITE PVN
SHEETINDEX
AD TOLE SMELT
001 SITE a BO.Aw SLMEY RAN
AIR SEE RAR
AD) DFYDIONW RAW
AN FLOOR RD6
AM Rob RAN
WE enum ODN110F6
ADI B1;1RO 50.TIOWS
S01 CDOM NOTES a TYROL SRUCTAOL DETAAS
S02 FOUNDATION RAIL
SOS ROOF FRAWK RAN
S01 S'eftcRIBK DOTES
1 VICINITY MAP 1
C/rY
OF
SARA TOGA
l
f
PR(),IErT
SITE
LEGEND
PROPOSED FLOOR AREA
® D051TNG FLOOR AREA
lam'
PADJECT TITLE
Remodel d Addition at
SRIPADANNA RESIDENCE
18524 Montpere Way, Saratoga, CA. 95070
I wrz � RD l REWmNs
DPAWINO TTTU
COVER SHEET
ARCIRTEGT SCALE D—NG N0.
Hai Sripodonrw
3327 Benton 5t. A01
Santo CIOO CA 95DSI. DATE
Phone: 14DB) 2960706 oL16m __ of __
k -414
!
j CI 10
?
API J69-21;- 015 % SL Ix 'L
DOC Na 18644566 6-HIGH
'ZIS57 A�DALE A HE 01 WCOO
LOT LZ TRACT 1195
MAPS �11
'C PE
T",
—A
WHICH
go L A ll�
DECbR TIVE
III ITE
EAGER
DE
PA
0
LAVOS!al
fi5ETWTNO
_�-014 f mw
Ooc . AIP. I3613 139 WOOD
85JI AaDvaiti A W. FENCE
LOT It.. 7R Cr 1195
ZY GRAPHIC SCALE
IN FM t
10 ft.
DAVE LINE
,y'9 FENCE
5w-
4
LAMAS OF KIONG
. Z7
7!pj�1D
ssrN
25a
APN 389-26-021
DOG Na
16524 MONTPERE WAY ROOF PEAK
LAAk75 of TA AV HO
AFN 389-26-023
L- 53.74 lt- 275.00 b.-T211,30,
—L�3 47
78436
18530 YON7FERIF MY
LOT SIZE - M.520 SQ. Fr. 5;."
E STORY WOW FRAME HOUSE
—
- — - — - —L -4 20.17---
i&4 —27&W
6-6 2TI
I
Qa
—T —A
50 MAPS 20-27
-25121
HIGH
",NOS CIF KAW"070
k
20-21. INCLUSIVE,
TA A CONTY RECORDS.
Oda
BRIM
AfW J89 -26-020
OC
DOG �71
Na Y2
6550 MOHIPERE WAY
389-26-022
LOT 17, TRACT 1334
VESTING DFFO-
DOC. NO. 19015632
50 MAPS 20-2?
.
RI
. ........
M 0 N T P
E R
E W A Y
Iw
THE APPROAMATE MAXEMIJIM AREA OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION WILL BE
1.400 SO. FT. VAIN A MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT OF Ill' FT.
OWNER NAME- S NAME,
BHAGA SRIPADANNA AND SAS K. MURMY mw LARD SURVEYING, NO
- ------- --
6 IGH 0
�VA
A P U B L I C
R O A D
- 50' WI DE)
.
FENCE 0
.......
'pA C
(408) 977-9170 FM
71'30`003- E
�AESTE
CE
STONE A Y. —
WALK EADER 1X
-1�O -
'�o -, - "o.- -
L
/"G-HllCH
PAVERS
COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 060351 0004 C
MNINUM LOT AREA INTERIOR LOTS - 14000 SOFT.
STONE IRRI
WALK wom
MN!MUM LOT FRONTAM 0 R. EFFECTIVE DAM JULY 3, 1997
L ♦ • W� A I A
MNNLN LOT WDI)t 85 R.
WIN" LOT DEPnt 115 Fr. ZONE. X
0
AREAS OF 500-YEAR FLOOD, AREAS °F
L% GO 7
MAXI" SEE COMRAM SOX 100-YEAR FLOOD NTH AVERAGE DEPTHS
WAMIUM HDORL M FEET OF LESS THAN I FOOT OR WITH DRAINAGE
AREAS LESS THAN I SQUARE MM' AND
SETBACK INFORMAEM INTERIOR LOB AREAS PROTECTED By LEVEES FROM
<
MBIIW47-
ME 10 FT.
REAR 25 FT.
SECOND ROM FRONT'. 25 FF. ORIENT USE SINGLE FAMILY 11EXIOMM.
w
k -414
!
j CI 10
?
API J69-21;- 015 % SL Ix 'L
DOC Na 18644566 6-HIGH
'ZIS57 A�DALE A HE 01 WCOO
LOT LZ TRACT 1195
MAPS �11
'C PE
T",
—A
WHICH
go L A ll�
DECbR TIVE
III ITE
EAGER
DE
PA
0
LAVOS!al
fi5ETWTNO
_�-014 f mw
Ooc . AIP. I3613 139 WOOD
85JI AaDvaiti A W. FENCE
LOT It.. 7R Cr 1195
ZY GRAPHIC SCALE
IN FM t
10 ft.
DAVE LINE
,y'9 FENCE
5w-
4
LAMAS OF KIONG
. Z7
7!pj�1D
0 BRICK
25a
APN 389-26-021
DOG Na
16524 MONTPERE WAY ROOF PEAK
LAAk75 of TA AV HO
AFN 389-26-023
i-VINtt
78436
18530 YON7FERIF MY
LOT SIZE - M.520 SQ. Fr. 5;."
E STORY WOW FRAME HOUSE
18524 MONTPERE WAY, SARATOGA, CA.
iA
HEADER'
LOT 14 TRACT 1324
BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA - 1.630 SC, FT.
FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION
—T —A
50 MAPS 20-27
-25121
HIGH
",NOS CIF KAW"070
k
20-21. INCLUSIVE,
TA A CONTY RECORDS.
Oda
BRIM
AfW J89 -26-020
OC
DOG �71
Na Y2
6550 MOHIPERE WAY
389-26-022
LOT 17, TRACT 1334
VESTING DFFO-
DOC. NO. 19015632
50 MAPS 20-2?
.
. . ........ . . ..
....
. ........
<
THE PROPOSED PROJECT CONSM OF ADDING A SINGLE STORY WTHIN THE ALLOWABLE SETBACKS TO AN
�STNO GlY FAMILY DWaiJNQ
zo
THE APPROAMATE MAXEMIJIM AREA OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION WILL BE
1.400 SO. FT. VAIN A MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT OF Ill' FT.
OWNER NAME- S NAME,
BHAGA SRIPADANNA AND SAS K. MURMY mw LARD SURVEYING, NO
- ------- --
6 IGH 0
�VA
------
-
-----
C/b HMC ARCHITECTURE (209 ) 345 -2773
.
FENCE 0
.......
'pA C
(408) 977-9170 FM
71'30`003- E
�AESTE
CE
STONE A Y. —
WALK EADER 1X
-1�O -
'�o -, - "o.- -
L
/"G-HllCH
PAVERS
COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 060351 0004 C
MNINUM LOT AREA INTERIOR LOTS - 14000 SOFT.
STONE IRRI
WALK wom
MN!MUM LOT FRONTAM 0 R. EFFECTIVE DAM JULY 3, 1997
L ♦ • W� A I A
k -414
!
j CI 10
?
API J69-21;- 015 % SL Ix 'L
DOC Na 18644566 6-HIGH
'ZIS57 A�DALE A HE 01 WCOO
LOT LZ TRACT 1195
MAPS �11
'C PE
T",
—A
WHICH
go L A ll�
DECbR TIVE
III ITE
EAGER
DE
PA
0
LAVOS!al
fi5ETWTNO
_�-014 f mw
Ooc . AIP. I3613 139 WOOD
85JI AaDvaiti A W. FENCE
LOT It.. 7R Cr 1195
ZY GRAPHIC SCALE
IN FM t
10 ft.
DAVE LINE
,y'9 FENCE
5w-
4
. Z7
7!pj�1D
0 BRICK
25a
WOOD FRAME
HOUSE
16524 MONTPERE WAY ROOF PEAK
LAAk75 of TA AV HO
AFN 389-26-023
i-VINtt
zi
LOT SIZE - M.520 SQ. Fr. 5;."
E STORY WOW FRAME HOUSE
18524 MONTPERE WAY, SARATOGA, CA.
iA
HEADER'
STC1,MD
BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA - 1.630 SC, FT.
FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION
—T —A
E -EA:� ARE-.
-25121
HIGH
:�
20-21. INCLUSIVE,
TA A CONTY RECORDS.
Oda
BRIM
k -414
!
j CI 10
?
API J69-21;- 015 % SL Ix 'L
DOC Na 18644566 6-HIGH
'ZIS57 A�DALE A HE 01 WCOO
LOT LZ TRACT 1195
MAPS �11
'C PE
T",
—A
WHICH
go L A ll�
DECbR TIVE
III ITE
EAGER
DE
PA
0
LAVOS!al
fi5ETWTNO
_�-014 f mw
Ooc . AIP. I3613 139 WOOD
85JI AaDvaiti A W. FENCE
LOT It.. 7R Cr 1195
ZY GRAPHIC SCALE
IN FM t
10 ft.
DAVE LINE
,y'9 FENCE
5w-
4
L-30.73
R-20.00
R-20.00
L-14.0
L-14-45
6411CW'
17",
Gala
I It
-51
TER
`AE
BUILDING
C1EAVE LINE
. Z7
ONE STORY
WOOD FRAME
HOUSE
LAAk75 of TA AV HO
AFN 389-26-023
DOC Na I6951]04
L-30.73
R-20.00
R-20.00
L-14.0
L-14-45
6411CW'
17",
Gala
I It
-51
TER
`AE
BUILDING
C1EAVE LINE
UNE
ONE STORY
WOOD FRAME
HOUSE
LAAk75 of TA AV HO
AFN 389-26-023
DOC Na I6951]04
zi
16516 MONTPiRE WAY
18524 MONTPERE WAY, SARATOGA, CA.
LOT 24 TRACT IJ24
50 MAPS 20-21
BEING ALL OF LOT 19, AS SAID LOT IS SHOWN ON THAT
CYTY
OF
SARA TOGA
TE
SITE PLAN AND SURVEY
OF THE LANDS OF
SRIPA,DANNA / MURTHY
zi
18524 MONTPERE WAY, SARATOGA, CA.
BEING ALL OF LOT 19, AS SAID LOT IS SHOWN ON THAT
C
CERTAIN TRACT MAP ENTITLED " PEREMONT TRACT UNIT 2%
0
RECORDED ON MAY 25. 1954, IN BOOK 50 OF MAPS AT PAGES
:�
20-21. INCLUSIVE,
TA A CONTY RECORDS.
Oda
ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER,
389-26-022
VESTING DFFO-
DOC. NO. 19015632
PROJECT DESCRIPTION-
<
THE PROPOSED PROJECT CONSM OF ADDING A SINGLE STORY WTHIN THE ALLOWABLE SETBACKS TO AN
�STNO GlY FAMILY DWaiJNQ
zo
THE APPROAMATE MAXEMIJIM AREA OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION WILL BE
1.400 SO. FT. VAIN A MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT OF Ill' FT.
OWNER NAME- S NAME,
BHAGA SRIPADANNA AND SAS K. MURMY mw LARD SURVEYING, NO
111524 WONiPERE WAY 1359 SAND HILL CT.
SARATOGA. CA. OAKDALE G. 9536
C/b HMC ARCHITECTURE (209 ) 345 -2773
(408) 977-9160 (209) U5-2042 FAX
(408) 977-9170 FM
ZONING INFORMATION'
I'VORMAnQ&-
'� n
CURRENT ZOKHQ R-i-locoo SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA
SINGLE FAMILY MMUENTAL
COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 060351 0004 C
MNINUM LOT AREA INTERIOR LOTS - 14000 SOFT.
< g
MN!MUM LOT FRONTAM 0 R. EFFECTIVE DAM JULY 3, 1997
0
MNNLN LOT WDI)t 85 R.
WIN" LOT DEPnt 115 Fr. ZONE. X
0
AREAS OF 500-YEAR FLOOD, AREAS °F
MAXI" SEE COMRAM SOX 100-YEAR FLOOD NTH AVERAGE DEPTHS
WAMIUM HDORL M FEET OF LESS THAN I FOOT OR WITH DRAINAGE
AREAS LESS THAN I SQUARE MM' AND
SETBACK INFORMAEM INTERIOR LOB AREAS PROTECTED By LEVEES FROM
<
FLOOR FROM m R. 10D -YEAR FLOOM
ME 10 FT.
REAR 25 FT.
SECOND ROM FRONT'. 25 FF. ORIENT USE SINGLE FAMILY 11EXIOMM.
w
SIDE. 15 FF. PROPOSED WE SINGLE
. . �LFALY -;- —GE)
RE-Alt 35 FT. -1 F Z.
>
<
EUILDING a-TBM3( VERIFICATICIt PRIOR TO FOUNDAMON AGE OF STRUCTURE:
D
'
INSPECTION 0 THE aTy. THE LLS OF WCORD SHALL PROVIDE Hous: omismtXIM 1955
A WRITTEN CERTIRCATION THAT ALL BUILDING WIRACKS ARE AGE - 51 YEARS
PER THE APPRM PLAN&
co
PARKIIIQ SEALS SINGLE FAULT DVIELLING . TWO CDVIERED A RA tl OP OF 51 SPACES WARN A GAIME, A 0.19 92 ACRES
HEIGHT INFORMATION, I L I M FEET
0
LOWEST ELEVATION PT AT BUILDING'S EDGE -25247
/ A - S
u-
D
HIGHEST ELEVATION PT AT BUILDING'S EDGE -25291' .00229(l)(L)
AVERAGE ELEVATICN - 252.6V .00229 .1 . 293 / 0.195592 - 1<1
Q 0
Top MOST ELEVATION POINT OF STRUCTURE - 26124' Z AVERAGE SLOPE - &43 X
HEIGHT - 10.55
z --
EXTERIOR WALL LENGTH:
=) C)
EASING EXTERIOR WALL LENGTH - IMPERVIOUS SITE COVERAGE'
STRUCTURE I.IQIg SO. FT.
z
0
> 1-1
EASTNG EXTERIOR WALL TO BE DEMOUSHED - 0 CARPORT
4-
LEGEND- PATIOS 1,170 SO. FT.
m
Lu
z
��
PA,, R, -16 SOL ".
APNI ASSESSORS PAR CEL NUMBER TOTAL COVERAGE - 3,969 SO, FT.
0
zw
W
GO BACK OF CURB
K BUILDING LINE PERCENT OF SITE COVERAGE - 46.561[
ALLOWABLE COVERAGE - 60x 46.561[
z
<
CHM CHIMNEY
CL CENTERLINE
LL
0
COI- COLUMN
CON CORNER ALLOWARLF FLOOR AREA,
0
CfNT CO?4TROL PONT SZE OF LOT a,520 SQ.
DIA. DIAMETER Fr.
z
DOC. NOL DOCUMENT NUMBER FLOOR AREA STANDARD. LOTS "I"D - I DO
EC EDGE OF CONCRETE - 2.400 SO. FT. PLUS ISO SO.' EVE EVERY
Fr. 1.
<
ELFC ELECTRICAL I'Goo SM FT. OF NET SITE AREA
EA OVER 5.000
CIA
TWO FENCE
Gm GAS METER SO. FT.
_j
NOR HEADER BOARD (FLUSH) ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA - 3.040 Sm R.
PI
1p IRON PE
JOINT
PSP(P.
FAIL PAVEMENT OM/ATTI-ONO
CV
"M PLANTER
(R) RADIAL
RDWO REDWOOD
FIR RAILROAD TE
SL SLOPE
ssco SAN TARY SEWER CLEMOUT
SS,IH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
SO. FT. SQUARE FEET
(TvP) TypGL
WM WATER METER
OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE LINE
SANITARY SEWER UNE
WATER UN
GAS LINE
SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE
CENTERLINE
BUILDING EAVE LINE
BUIL04NO UNE
TREE OM HE
SHRUB DRIPLINE
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
THE BEARING SOUTH 21 11* EAST, OF THE CIENTERLINE OF THE CUL-DE-SAC BEING A PORTION OF MONTPERE
— - -
- - —
EN
WAY, BETWEEN THE TWO FOUND MONUMENTS ON THE CENTERLINE OF SAID CUL -DE -SAC. AS SAID CENTERLUE
AND MONUMENTS ARE SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN TRACT MAP ENTITLED 'PEREMONT TRACT UNIT 2', RECORDED
IN BOOK 50 OF MAPS AT PAGE 21, SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDS, WAS USED AS THE BASS OF ALL
BEARINGS SHOWN ON THIS MAP.
BENCHMARK'
S.C,V.W.D. BM-187 - BRASS OIS( ON THE TOP OF THE CONCRETE ABUTMENT CAP AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER
THE S.P.R.R. BRIDGE OVER SAN TOMAS MEEK IN THE CITY OF SARATOGA.
ELEVATION 2711.43'
DATUMi USC-GS NOW 1929
NOTES
1. DATE OF SURVIEr. AUGUST 22 2006.
I ALL DISTANCES ME SHOWN IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF.
I ALL BEARINGS ME SHOWN IN DEGREES, MINUTES AND SECONDS.
4 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY.
5. CONTOUR INTERVAL - 1 FOOT.
-NT-.
THIS MAP AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE PREPMM BY WE OR PREPARED UNDER MY
DIRECTION.
BRADLEY A. &LBO DATE
PLS 6141
ELI'.: 43/31/03
E
s
APR -31
364PB020
RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTY
0
_.._w.... ... .... __
MONTPERE WAY
pwtMi -x -wKe
APN
3&426-11
RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTY
%1 �1�1 /
MONTPERE WAY
P—Er-- aaTTDEI
RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTY
RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTY
GENERAL NOTES
,. vwaR
=MA
110R n®[croR e� na rnr, na us o< RECtlD
ARE F p QAiRfA1DR iHAT All BUTAD 4TBIC16
ARE PEA iR /PWrECT &L
Z GREATER) AID PRORLf ALL DOSfnD 11FE511nN 6' 0.l(dt
GREATER) IRIAlC
I SEE anE sur+Er new Ion Ion Au DnsnRC R+ff SrrE lDMTOI
AND YIM
VICINITY MAP
NoItA
RESIDENTIAL �! /
PROPERTY
PR.ECT TRLE
Remodel to Addition at
SRIPADANNA RESIDENCE
18524 Montpere Way, Saratoga, CA. 95010
no
R SM5
M e
o.nv�
Ro.
so a
TMTE
North
a,nvo,
CRAW
HG TTT-E
SITE PLAN &
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPING PLAN
ARC
H.i pda,,,,o
5EN E
DRAW NO.
SITE PLAN
1
CA95051.
MTE
A02
Santo Clam
PI,—.: 1406) 2960706 1
DEMOLITION NOTES
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPON98LE FOR ALL
CUTTING AND PATCHING FOR PROPER INSTALLATION OF
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — _
rom fE1N¢
P�� v (q
Noll. sEE AIIX DD.
MATERVLS AND EQUIPMENT, AND FOR PROTECTION OF
ADJACENT CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING SHORING OF
RUNE PORTX N � ��� �
OF RXF, '�'yYYYY YYYYXV vYYYYY YYYYYVV v YYYYYYYYY YYYYYY Y JVVOOOOOC7l7 .7VVVC7C7CJVVVGr.O'700�JCts]
AiIQI "pR.$ %) YYYYYYYYY YY Y Y YYYYYYXXXXXXYYYY Y Y Y YY NXY
_ <
_
<x
(4 Naar• A10 DFIX
THE CONTRACTOR C STRUCTURE _ OF
Z ALL DEMOLITION OESNo11 DR11H7P7C$ AND REMOVE
ONLY WHAT 6 NECESSARY.
I CURING AND WEAKENING OF EXISTING STRUCTURAL
PROHIBITED
PCI E
LESS SEFIED ON DRAWINGS.
x II it II u_-------- --------------JI II I <Y
4. REMOVE ALL INTERIOR i EXTERIOR FINISHES TO FACE
/ I I I I
x II II nLL— II rr= 11 I Cx
OF STUD
STUD.
5. REMOVE ALL FLOOR FINISHES h PREPARE LEVEL
'WARM
101
SURFACES, SUFFICIENT FOR INSTALLATION OF
II 0'0
BaY2D• RADIANT SYSTEM.
6. REMOVE ALL EXISTING DOORS AND WIDOWS.
7 REMOVE ALL SHELVING C ASEWORK, PLUMBING
FIXTURES
x y y
B REMOVAL, SrORCE OF APPLIANCES SFNLL BE
-
<x
x xJJ.. X77. 9 %yyx x 1C X-3 RR7C7CA 7t xxxxxx RA i(x A°� x ,cY x ;c x� XA R �� <x
>"�'y�'��'��' �'K�K�' K
.
COORDINATED WITH OWNER.
9. REMOVE /J.L LIGHT FIXTURES, ELECTRICAL WIWNG 3
�l�K 1 <x
x Z,xJJ.. x77.. xJJ�� x J� xxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xxx xxx xxxxxxxxx xx Ax xx xx Ax xK <x , Cx
x Yr'�'Y�%vY�v� y ��x'v�xx' `< <x
x k rx x� x� xxXxxxxxxxxXxXxxxxxxXxxXX xxXxxxxXxxXXxxxxxxxXXx AX AX Ax Ax AX X 1
���v5<�<� �+ I
COMPONENTS, INCLUDING MAP! EECTWCAL PANEL
10. REMOVE EXISTING RADIANT HEATING BOILER. WATER
HEATER AND OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
x � J^4 ..x .xx xx-x- ,xx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xx � � Ax <x {x
x k 5 x x xT xA. xxxxxx xx xx xxxxxxxxxxkxx - xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxx Ax Ax <x
x r ��)' <k
x k k
�
COORDINATE WITH OWNER.
11. CUTTING AND PATCHING OR REMOVAL OF UTILITIES
(ABOVE OR BELOW GRADE), OUWNG CONSTRUCTION
x � xT x/. Xxxxxxx xx xx xxx xx x xxxxxx xx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Axe A *r �{(?x� <x� �<(�x. I
x x xk �Sx •r.x xxxxxxxxx xx xxxxxxxxxxx xxx xx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xx,y x Kx <x I
XY �" K KvS � � 1 {y
SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH OWNER AND ASSOCLITED
Zr
E, <x
x �TTk �JJ�k k j.XXXXXXXXXX Xx XXXX%XXXXXXXXX xx XXxxXXXX %xxxxXXXX %%XXXX XXxxXX��<yy#� {X {X,Z <X I <x
�4'.0
UTILITY COMPANY.
X k+(+<j�.( �XN .xx Xx xxxxxx xx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx X Xxxxxxx %xxxxxxxxxxx % % -xxx xx xxX.0 ;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ k<x
D' - N <xC k<x�Yx xxxxxxx- xx x x x x x xxx xx xxxxxxx xxx xxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxx x xxx xx xx�C41 { {x� {xKx I �`<k
x S< YYYY 1111 .j.��. .(�� P,
.C(Jk
(F) CONG tlMMY
yy <x
Pc x x J.k�Y .YTx�Y .Y X/.).x xxxxxx xx xxxxxxxxxxx xxx xxxx xxxxxx - itMitihX- io-Kxxxxxxxxxxxx Xx Kx.(,N�+y�\x� {x� { %� I
Yjx�q /xxxxx xx>)1S�32S
1 YY YY Y�YY
- k �jk/�.J.X /�J.k/�.jk jk/�.x xxx xx xxxx x xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx# xxxx xxxxxxxxx (X Xx CCx `CI>k < x,`C(Jj <x"(5 `xM'NX xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx�Kk
wY K>,
x 1Y 7Y YY 1�1Y .(��.(�� .(��
x x k k x X k k xxJlxX xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx zzTCx -;c xx Xx, CX
xxxxx Kx`C, Xx � XXx`C. ?(X�5 <x xx xxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx K1�K�
x Xx XX Xx %x %xXXX%Xx yc- xxzzfcxxxx�txfcyc�(x +(\z^/�'+tvvx� +� `C'\^/x7
�(,��\.(���/.�/o�c xX�x bCk<<�Y. xxxxxx Xx X%xxx XxxxxX XXxXx.�xX�CK�k
k Yx Yx Y Yx Yx Yx Yk xxxxxxx x XXxxxxxxxxXx X %xXXXXXxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Yx CKx KKx YX xx+l x[xK xx % xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx xk�CxxK KI
—�.�. -
-- ---
North
DEMOLITION ROOF PLAN
1
- — —� — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Nneac PoRrux a THE snn rPAwna
FAR WNDOI NSLVlA1No SEE r9IX1I
wwu r PNESENrE A'O PROIECf
rrAOER/NODF eEa Amc m.
LEGEND
® SAWCUr <E> FLOOR
_
11 II �y rE7 y,�
I I I I • E:avAIEr DNIr, LME A5 11 / LL — — — — -- I1 I I I
Kassmw.
VERFY IN LlE I / ________________ij II I
SLAB/FOUNDATION
REMOVE PORTION OF EXISTING
ROOF d SHEATHING
II II �U?rp�
I I k M OJT s NE�Nn of coN GfwE /� �raaanari�cooNtuah I I Ir— ILL I
wr SA TO ,,,,j�
MN w. maNUNV' "i�Y II I �mramaN rrtN II _ _ J.__ _
� /1'I'� snnx�tm+t oRAruaGS �.y...i
[__] REMOVE EXISTING WALL
II II_
II II I \ I1� / /y>''A a II ♦ I
(E) 2X4 WOOD STUD WALL TO
RUMN
eooamr5
DUO ON
/-2
u n i u II i', m�ucn,rak nuwxc� /1
-- - - - -- --
lI
(b POM IYP.
(L) CQID aR9E%1T
�\ /
�, �iTirinnnrr1r�r�i"71 :17z,71,71 7 � r � = �z � Tom_ ��7n �' !%��7�J
North
L _ J ',I /TU' / / ///
L---------
�1J1%1/11I7 _ /7i1%T�1iLiG .LSD `�
IEIOV(r OF E1fIRON L —..v = = _ ..� / /'nom ❑ ❑ O
�,K = ____________1
I L `\ II
� lq mN� PAVERS
PROJECT TrnE
(fjCWGPM6VG -1 \\
--------------------------
Remodel& Addition at
1 - - - -- - - - -n - -- —,
SRIPADANNA RESIDENCE
18524 MOntpere Way, Saratoga, CA. 95070
RQ \7
\� IO.L Q eN/IJfENCi k GTE � ` ) /
(
/'
ND
NLVSaa
CATE
V.
Wt
DATE
m N
-- - - �'
°rth
DRAW Na RE
DEMOLITION PLAN
__ % \
� a 1
ARCHITECT
Hai SripaaaDt.
6027 6enton SL
Santa Ckra CA 95051.
SCALE
DRANING NO.
A03
DEMOLITION FLOOR PLAN
1
DATE
1M• =,•-0•
Plw :(406) 2960706
WJW
E
S
CLOSET I ,o 1/2. CLOSET
YA
r/]
\ � BEDROOM 2 e B
Ew7H 3 BEDROOM 3
IriD'ae°N'-e•
XC Qo
i
--
I
A7 I
19' -9•
JI'i•
X7
X3
mnw0 Yw
KITCHEN
LIVING
a
SE w9c
FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD, U.O.N.
2. SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE FOR WINDOW TYPES
1. SEE ROOF PLAN FOR CLEARSTORY WIDOW LOCATIONS
4. PROVIDE R11 BATT INSULATION OVER (E) ROOF
5. PROVIDE R30 THERMAL GATT INSULATION AT NEW
ROOF
6. PROVIDE TYPE GYP. BOARD AT INTERIOR GARAGE
WALLS
7. PROVIDE R11 INSULATION IN ALL EXIERUOR WALLS
U.O.N.
B. ALL INTERIOR WALLS SHALL RECEIVE GYP. BOARD
(LEVEL 4) FINISH.
BLOCK DIAGRAM OF <E> AND NEW CONSTRUCTION 1
' OOORd
i e
TLT DRNLiIY
DOE
xu raVVws
i
i
9e7�eR,
BATH I
,•_e 1
9rVerV9.
BEDROOM 1
EM
r
DOOR
STUDY
'
..
DRA„'ING ,,,LE
FLOOR PLAN
I
2CAR GARAGE
�E >DRNEWAY
Hot m' potla
S�UIE
DRAWING NO.
G)
m EVnr¢
e e
e'er' DINNING
Srnta Clara .. U 9'1151 .
p/,lE
.�— Sv9rt a r-e•
MY -a•
" °
ASHERIDRY
I �
' aosEr '
i 7
r -0x
LEGEND
Ca'
r -J I/2'
r -9
2x4 or 2.6 WOOD STUD Wµ1• SEE S.D.
CORRIDOR
_ «
CLOSET I ,o 1/2. CLOSET
YA
r/]
\ � BEDROOM 2 e B
Ew7H 3 BEDROOM 3
IriD'ae°N'-e•
XC Qo
i
--
I
A7 I
19' -9•
JI'i•
X7
X3
mnw0 Yw
KITCHEN
LIVING
a
SE w9c
FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD, U.O.N.
2. SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE FOR WINDOW TYPES
1. SEE ROOF PLAN FOR CLEARSTORY WIDOW LOCATIONS
4. PROVIDE R11 BATT INSULATION OVER (E) ROOF
5. PROVIDE R30 THERMAL GATT INSULATION AT NEW
ROOF
6. PROVIDE TYPE GYP. BOARD AT INTERIOR GARAGE
WALLS
7. PROVIDE R11 INSULATION IN ALL EXIERUOR WALLS
U.O.N.
B. ALL INTERIOR WALLS SHALL RECEIVE GYP. BOARD
(LEVEL 4) FINISH.
BLOCK DIAGRAM OF <E> AND NEW CONSTRUCTION 1
PRDJEU MLE
Remodel & Addition at
SRIPADANNA RESIDENCE
18524 Montpere Way Saratoga CA 95010
' OOORd
i e
TLT DRNLiIY
DOE
xu raVVws
i
i
9e7�eR,
9rVerV9.
Xg
�
NO' /''`h
MEL
..
DRA„'ING ,,,LE
FLOOR PLAN
I
2CAR GARAGE
�E >DRNEWAY
Hot m' potla
S�UIE
DRAWING NO.
M
m EVnr¢
3327Be
A04
Srnta Clara .. U 9'1151 .
p/,lE
FrWe:(40312960708
LEGEND
2x4 or 2.6 WOOD STUD Wµ1• SEE S.D.
,e•i'
. I
- .. . _
® (E) 2x4 WOOD STUD WALL
i�
o
. " -A7.
CONIC, PAVING 4' THICI(
®
��
ME
r -axr -e
o
v
i
r-oxra
LAWN
7777 77
3'
as
roFE"M
5' FENCE
1
PRDJEU MLE
Remodel & Addition at
SRIPADANNA RESIDENCE
18524 Montpere Way Saratoga CA 95010
i
90 9amra
DOE
xu raVVws
i
9e7�eR,
9rVerV9.
�
NO' /''`h
DRA„'ING ,,,LE
FLOOR PLAN
Hot m' potla
S�UIE
DRAWING NO.
FLOOR PLAN
3327Be
A04
Srnta Clara .. U 9'1151 .
p/,lE
FrWe:(40312960708
i
10-2
FLAT ROOF SPECIFICATIONS:
1. WHITE, CDOL ROOF CERTIFIED SINGLE MEMBRANE.
2_ 60 NIL MEMBRANE MIN.
3. MECHANICALLY FASTENED,
4. ROOF SLOPE 1/4':12' TYP.
5. 1/4' OR 1/2' DENSE DECK UNDERIAYMENT
6. SLOPE : TAPPERED INSULATION (9f ROOFING
CONTRACTOR), UNLESS INDICATED AS RIP CUT BEMIS AS
INDICATED ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN (BY FRAMER)
7. 15 YEAR WARRANTY MIN.
B. SEE ROOFING DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.
I
I
I
I
I
1
/
/ LEGEND
EXISTING ROOF
ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF
TPO SINGLE ROOFING MEMBRANE
ROOF PLAN
�J f
PRWECT THLE
Remodel & Addition at
SRIPADANNA RESIDENCE
18524 Montpere Way, Saratoga, CA. 95070
North
I I I I I I
DRAMING TIKE
ROOF PLAN
MCWIFCT
Hari Sipotlamo
3327 Benton St.
S nta Ck. CA 95051.
Phone: 140812960706
SCALE
DINE
annm
DMMING NQ
A05
1/4• =1' -0'
111
T
7
XA
MASPHALT
y
T
C D
GENERAL NOTES:
ALL WINDOWS DOORS SHALL BE
JELD WEN POZZ, COLLECTION. WOOD WINDOW
W/ ALUM. CLADDING
rtld ----------- ---------------
mIll oll.-I
Ag%kT SINUn
...........
..... Ir _W
TA
GLAZING: DUAL PANE -I' , LOW-E, TEMPERED.
moff PIASIFA
II
WOOD MM—
+1
I
ARGON FILL
ALUMINIUM CLAD : HUNTER GREEN (KYNAR 500)
WOOD FASCA
WOOD FASCA
PRE-FIN1514ED (PINE WOOD) INTERIOR, CLEAR
COAT
MOO RA510 E
6 9/16 JAMBS OR 4 X/X AMBS W/ AAJL FIN (&
3:12
DRI CAP)
VOOD FASCIA
WOOD
HARDWARE :DOORS 3 LOCK SECURE BRUSHED
(E) 3:12 y
CROME HARDWARE
lell,;L
m
I WOOD
L
Ig
SOUTH ELEVATION
9102
Al
re rd
owl Q (D
DOOR & WINDOW LS
LEGEND
RWOOD
SIDING
MASPHALT
SHINGLE ROOF
CEMENT PLASTER
PAPAPU W�
mIll oll.-I
Ag%kT SINUn
m1l; oll
PAPAM IVIl
moff PIASIFA
II
I 11
+1
I
9102
Al
re rd
owl Q (D
DOOR & WINDOW LS
LEGEND
RWOOD
SIDING
MASPHALT
SHINGLE ROOF
CEMENT PLASTER
1311
DRAWING NO.
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A06
Sanfo Ckm CA 95051. OF --
5' i' v Y
T
TII- GA iPEI' N/11
B.C. FRWK
ADI -ur:-
ava
SECTION A-A
is a
ova
IN GYVGE
SECTION E-E
T
W 1:12 3:12 oI
—RI9 R 1
GARAGE MRPJD-IOF I BOILER
3
TIMIS-
J,
0
-------------------- ---- ----- 4l
lx-r
Rig
R3
R19
Rw M C k D
T�
CLOSET f..I.R BATH ORRIDO CLOSET WNG ROOM 10 GARAGE
I n�i - ' 0
BUILDING SECTIONS 1
1/4• = V-V
PROJECT TITLE
Remodel Addition at
SRIPADANNA RESIDENCE
18524 Montpere Way, Saratoga, CA. 95070
MO RETS XS 6,1E Iq. 11(44016 I
DRAWING TIRE
BUILDING SECTIONS
MCHI=
Hut MpadwrIa DRAWING NO.
3327 Benton St.
S.M. a.. CA 95051. A07
Phone: (408) 2960708
N"
1�� I
SECTION B-B
TII- GA iPEI' N/11
B.C. FRWK
ADI -ur:-
ava
SECTION A-A
is a
ova
IN GYVGE
SECTION E-E
T
W 1:12 3:12 oI
—RI9 R 1
GARAGE MRPJD-IOF I BOILER
3
TIMIS-
J,
0
-------------------- ---- ----- 4l
lx-r
Rig
R3
R19
Rw M C k D
T�
CLOSET f..I.R BATH ORRIDO CLOSET WNG ROOM 10 GARAGE
I n�i - ' 0
BUILDING SECTIONS 1
1/4• = V-V
PROJECT TITLE
Remodel Addition at
SRIPADANNA RESIDENCE
18524 Montpere Way, Saratoga, CA. 95070
MO RETS XS 6,1E Iq. 11(44016 I
DRAWING TIRE
BUILDING SECTIONS
MCHI=
Hut MpadwrIa DRAWING NO.
3327 Benton St.
S.M. a.. CA 95051. A07
Phone: (408) 2960708
N"
1�� I
e- -d
Community Development Department Item 3C
City of Saratoga
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, California 95070
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 14, 2007
TO: Heritage Preservation Commission
FROM: Shweta Bhatt, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT:. Determination of whether or. not existing structure on the subject site is
historically significant.
Property Location: 15211 Hume Drive, Saratoga, California
Property APN: 510 -01 -016
Project Applicant: Sergio Ramirez
Property Owners: Adel and Maria Khouja
Project Summary
The applicant requests a determination from the HPC regarding whether or not the existing
structure is historically significant. The applicant proposes to deconstruct the structure and build
a new single family residence.
Property History
The property is not currently listed on the City's Historic Resources Inventory. Given the
structure's apparent age, staff requested the applicant summarize characteristics of the home;
please see attached letter.
Decision by HPC
The applicant is requesting a determination of the HPC regarding the historical significance of
the structure. The following are options available to the Commission in reviewing this proposal:
1. Determine that the structure is not historically significant:. If the Commission
determines that the structure is not historically significant, the property would not be
listed on the Historic Resources Inventory. The applicant would move forward in the
permitting process.
2. Request additional information before determining whether or not the
property /structure is historical: Require the applicant to have an historical
assessment prepared by a qualified consultant to determine the historical significance of
the property /structure and return to the HPC with his /her findings and recommendation
regarding the proposal.
3. Determine that the property /structure is historically significant and direct staff to
place the structure on the historical list: If the Commission determines that the
property /structure is historically significant:
HPC August 14, 2007 Meeting
Project Address: 15211 Hume Drive
Project Applicant: Sergio Ramirez
Property Owners: Adel and Maria Khouja
■ Demolition of the existing structure would not be allowed and the applicant
would not be able to proceed in the permitting process to construct a new
home.
■ At least one (1) of the seven (7) criteria listed in the City code must be
selected to reflect the reasons why the structure is significant.
■ Staff would place the property on the Historic Resources Inventory and
proposed future alterations to the structures would require HPC review and
would be required to meet Standards for historic properties.
Attachments
(1) Project data letter date - stamped August 06, 2007
.(2). Architectural drawings
Memorandum to the Saratoga Historic Preservation Commission Page 2
PROJECT DATA
Owners: Adel and Maria Khouja
Address: 15211 Hume Drive, Saratoga, CA 95070
APN: 510 -01 -016
App. No.: PDR07 -0001
GpMM
A visit to the site was performed with the purpose of evaluating the characteristics of the existing
building.
The existing building is not a single entity architecturally or historically. There is ample evidence
that the building was constructed in several stages and at different times.
The Preliminary Title report states that the property was sub- divided by the then current owner,
Mr. Clayton,and recorded at the Santa Clara County Recorders office on -- May, 1945.
What appears to be the oldest part of the house exhibits characteristics that put it in the
1940's - 1950's timeframe. It is the only portion of the house that is clad in brick, painted white. There
are numerous coats of paint visible on the brick face, all of them in various shades of white,
suggesting that the house has been repainted in the same tones over and over again.
This portion of the building is supported by a continuous conventional 'T footing with a lip to
support the brick cladding: The brick is set in uneven lines (the joints vary in width), as a means of
creating more of a rustic appearance. The brick appears to be wire cut (see photo), and it has been
used for walkways and a rear patio. The brick portion of the house has two different types of
windows, one of them is single pane, true divided light, single pane and fixed, and there are three
of them facing the street. One of them has obscure glass, since it hides the fact that the room behind
is the mechanical closet. The windows have deep green (forest green) shutters that are decorative
and non operable. It is the same case with all the shutters around two sides of the house where they
exist. On the left side of the building, there is a rather large window that is also built as a TDL, but
it is 1/2" steel angle, with the glass pane held in place by mastique (See photo). This window
as all the others, is in poor condition.
The roofing framing was executed with 2 x 4 rafters spaced 24" on centers, and there is
no gutter. The roofing material is No. 1 handsplit cedar shake in very poor condition. The gable end
of this building is built with 2 x 12 vertical planking, with the joints covered with a 1 x 4 trim piece,
a type of construction known as board and batt. The main part of the building, attached to the brick
building, is also supported by a conventional "T" footing and has a conventional crawl space.
The framing throughout is conventional 2 x 4 framing, with conventional ceilings all finished in
gypsumboard, except for the Living Room which is an open beam ceiling with 4 x 8 rafters
spaced at about 4', with resawn and whitewashed wood ceiling, much in use in the 1960's
and early 1970's. The exterior of the house is shiplap, also painted white, with galvanized steel
on outside comers and 2 x 2's in the interior corners. The nails used throughout are conventional
galvanized nails, and no square nails that would have indicated a much older construction.
The windows are, with the exception of two small ones, TDL's in single pane and of the single
P
spaced at about 4', with resawn and whitewashed wood ceiling, much in use in the 1960's
and early 1970's. The exterior of the house is shiplap, also painted white, with galvanized steel
on outside corners and 2 x 2's in the interior corners. The nails used throughout are conventional.
galvanized nails, and no square nails that would have indicated a much older construction.
The windows are, with the exception of two small ones, TDL's in single pane and of the single
hung type, fitted with aluminum screens on an aluminum frame. All large windows have deep green
(forest green) decorative shutters. It is evident that the idea behind the addition was to create a
New England feeling, including a cupola over the main door, with a copper roof and a weathervane.
The rear portion of the house has a covered porch with a brick surface, to which another
porch was added at a later time. Since the first porch is 24' long, it has three supporting posts.
When the new porch was added,the original posts were not eliminated. The result is a fairly large
porch, with a set of posts in the middle of it that preclude full use of the space. In order to maintain
a certain unity, the gable ends of this portion of the building are also built with board and batt,
and the recessed part of the porch is finished the same way. The rest of the building as noted,
is all shiplap.
All the windows and patio doors in the back are TDL's, all in wood, and all single pane.
They also seem to have come from different manufacturers, since they have different detailing
(see photos). The necessity of having to maintain a minimum slope on the addition to the porch,
the roof has a minimum pitch resulting in a_6' -8" headroom at the exterior support beam.
The last part of the building is a garage that has two doors to the front and one to the back.
The garage also has shiplap, but it is smoother than the rough sawn used in the rest of the
house, where the circular patterns of the cutting saw could be discerned. The garage has
conventional framing, and the garage doors are plywood,as seen in the stamp (see photo),
and in the photo showing the door from the inside. The garage has conventional
concrete floor, slab on grade, and it has overhangs front and back but not on the sides.
Although the stamp does not show a date, it seems to be from the 1960's or early 70's.
When considered as a whole, the existing house can be. said to be a series of additions
to a basic structure that were done on different dates during a time frame of the 1940's to the
early 1970's. It does not appear that thiswas an integrated design that was executed over time,
but rather small additions built as needs grew and /orfunds became available for construction.
It is difficult to explain the variety of materials and window and door manufacturers otherwise.
It is an old house that is in very poor condition, but one which will be recycled in full.
Respectfully submitted,
Sergio E. Ramirez -Batiz & Assoc.
Sergio E. Ramirez -Batiz
Principal
stsad i D
pl1(', � F 2001
GITY 0` SP' OPMENT
ScMMUMTY D
DODGE 6 ASSOCIATES SURVEYING
•� D
Tbp b• ]
.aaGfANO
Ju,)E i, Z007
15o0,1DARY SURy -SY
AT LJ0% Qtr An2L 4 MAZA KMOU TA aOJ,O
!S-2[[ MJme C2•- S*&ATOCA G. {p
o.r [r pit
Wes•r 790. 16' - t�
�s40 A�
f \4°
�4-
�P`1
[dr��0,. P 3
. s SSta E•t r 'ya' { Sqt pp �S
5• -.•r Staffs.
L. EP ST 322.0 ^' _r/ >.zFA
No. e
1!50 fo a ^a•�r
(;)Fc
aam
7 Wm.•v-
c.mr "NMM
tiaw+m
m -or -o-7
Ma. i (AmN AoEL Kv4QQSA l 4t i6au Woe m
ft%6 J8. I, Lti7 -07
0"0 0 &acts
Pte YQLAL HaJE C9�WLAITO iwe
A�r2A(bE SLO4E oP THE SJflSEG7 A%R*0.7r (IIPn)tro- ol.lb)
A' AREA, S[131 Snit, (1,i74• Ac
LcJ76JE5
,uc%
S > CoJ Tc.IL iaTiG/AL . 2'
am ♦.n.
bet
L+ CLJ 7DJ 1. Li. A.6TH. $?p L. Pr,
lac „
�� •• 1.7 ••
boa 3e
TOTAL BZO •,FT
5 ,, 0.0023 • I • L_
A
S t Q.00 21. 2 • d2O
1. -14
h i�, �� i � y pEVE��pM
� �� / &OMMU N
_K•AiLie_. _ - •.- TtCC..mmTir GGT�-aam-�a 1'l09/fyll�fiy� -� l
- �_ - �-- T.•"L_Slvvu�ICT•T _TmPAllaiT`J -ILA .�P__ ._
-
I2Y�G6C:4iDeKt179�_
lltL 3$3JD0 _
�t. _ _. = 555D0-3��J' � 23t'li- zrena. �n>t1�%7•. :
,: • �[!!h R'E4R. TRI,uJ19lsA .� ' �4.YC� �._��'iF- 8[t7Pls �'3''�pc5 .. .. _�Ll '�,i` : �..
= 3+f6liUii�Ti4�?'p'6�Fs� "s __ �_`-_ra* $ _.�fiJA•�T�P�ta.[ € ._ - �4 `,
��_ y�irty .)41• Y _Z+Iil M5 .4i�_O �GGbD�l`T 3�6 T , _. i.:
- HLW._ 517 q 1D.IT'-AS�C %:
. `N[FGlc 1$�YA�- �7i7?[ff2i_�L�L�Li - X•�T°�ifii% E
.
Z7fAjrt 29iW ANHWWRr¢Eif ft5 7
- �°KST!!AT.E%i�d Ceiytfe 1T
_ _ X =� j .7JTlGlz= GEYEG t�
t
x+ru�RQV,wcts �[..Y- �s�r.a�u-¢x �x crr�- t�l�+l�rrw[�[���%,1��-��[�c 1 A•7- ,- ���3fa�.t�:a�� 33�. =.
RpmTrs>,i'[go- [�e.iJ3�l irELE'PIL><YH�avr+•as fir.s[:xP 14s.
��S_�?!E I�i�7?++a+t �a�: A2�.n•�aY_ELl9�YtAf��.. "1`!F� �V[�-[r�tizp+rrF_t?�C 1 7:5 � -'Wi. 4E5iE4 fL�7,1 _
iA tetu[cs?;rEa1 airs &T PL? Lr!7C "�v¢�cR 1gL
'"�'?+>€1cna[►P¢ O�ta�c urwA�vm,�fi�iPr tsw.ys[e t�FiGartsisacu�eph'L�ypL•c^rZ I7:TQ tioY•TF' ;�o'fFf W.EVlrc�rbTl3 -- -
t'n�1�riF�Tes
[eq�uesa fiA+3icai cC�Y -_ - -- - AAz tm Mbux, eheecrtsncv - -
�- 1w1i7i �e•I�4gCu�1 � - - -- - - __ c \1 %•ei.0 � uJ[S._€¢Cti+�i'4 iil4saq+6 - -
�e_ciuhi- qua- "[wuag ��w "�[- _-_mac' 7�•! LTE !w•YC.�'sst7�ZiEP�irT.6.�(�zzc R�rrr'�.ylEt�.[�ctET'nF���iJ�9' Fo"J�rvw�ti[aL��?�iS�� -_ -
'- F"s'F�iN -Yw�[ rte' TRL 7919Mr -
"7+EW' (Z!6i7D�>'fCE FW516E DP,"+I A�Iif J,kS�[kMti SNE f.[Tz'_3 'fia�RSi?.A}E JG ::C Al+e W �; [•TQqtlic.°.•'R- 7H%4K7{[Lf"itCNAy GS IP'+$R7� -_....
?PUrjc -- %alluC ' -,-w T•ii�7'L7L�- . A�2 "`�&- .�4 HRVE'6 Sd GO;VFIf.Ut�ED.14.N,UMl'S�E..[ 7W,sR�rii
�I _������!��fa?sGG+�dtiE�r?t±i?�5 PPQbtFE �1E- M?SI!p[iBh.Z>A�`�E�7 -��7 i�''c5N Tti4�FRt'k't�? � MNN
JSE•� U4�Ty ANO T4}[Ji.19q('J1Y�'_i�R���z -fl+€ 3��JZ ?TF'+��fmp�G�li?.�F.i- [N�`'I IN�1«PTE €]'hNE[s AN6NEb
�OJ�.. �?�1x��. C' Sly1- t%�Q�E�111�1.�'4i�.�TE_Y� .L`��'S.[�L`YZ �.�WSES TffL4E- 1"( �TEKS_. jif[ L4 _P.I��PV�4(:yWAlk+��•!t- :4�1�.
=mwwwj a em r± :Asa =Ecc r rnu _ . x�e s �rr[r a� [ , eer«q-,: AV- i•DEDKeiri-[r. mN(IF763L WTO- W441,01t AV-
»>,7Z11•L1e�T4`PaYFgwCS[PM4 Pe'CTfE\SA4"LE. A� i9tDY+
PX
�7•+ �lt�!' �t� °EfS�[F�:.'mtz+'tal.AS= .k[,.V� tin! .
��C1'�ig _ veswr ,•�.1�'F�ti6.k?:TiRSnc-47wne�c _ge�:.AQ+wy F71F 12&w1.tF�'( :�PIK4N��S1✓]fiK6 T[F+t-'4 FJ.+i- [15�e• _ ._ -� -
.�i�a�s PKd1�R1' 9' rS. MQRf _iA6Y.4S5�- �l'U�P9��i?(7[lF+- qtr= CFiA K.= LT. ff1S53�+ iL\tF�Ym?I?}+]KOi_rTky'F�u�FE3r
€' f+ usU. SEV: FT�rr. �" Ttp? �- �sF_ �SkntiY�Fr�NX► 4r_ ti: l��Y_[2+�. :� :�_I?5�11- �?N[a\ntE �aitLYl�cst tli�fva= �F?�ie�.
�'N_n. wn4PR-ace_epngl ` tFr, }sue .R.�+PFtSR��� tom+ 1��.�m�a iii ri?e ves�ar[ �St� S �a vc.?�'t i[c� t�snn[e� _
JFR,S MRS tC.HOq�, ➢lAKTGp pIIJlt r7a kuX� 77b�T FN4[15�. .BFT LQ@Wv. a/3g4W%:W,itSE 14JF11. 9tF/NMEAT '4 GA�W.Tex,.
�" 744$: liE - WA[k1= TXxINC h[6�AU45 F•1}V7�[ffGl ?p Tii AATt7�!�j. ErR7l\ TAE F±4[YR. 3t1aSx v s�s_iiL'd T@ /FFfN'ti7�1;FS Awil pormmcc
'_ 7.s -Yasr eye• foal: ?�' .¢..T( :TrNe6 \a.1.1 rns ?YS, rr4DiOC ►t+. tacT - - W_±T Y i! T4 "n\C_144J'Fe rtALi m- ao.,v.:�l+o
T.- �pv- P�pvtl'+� /s4 M1kH.li$._^+SK>• JbTI•.�,. A [QSC -[o x�N Av,�+[to-ttv�. 1:wW19• •Viv.:- G.�.le\t[rFT4Ni!i. L°'�'A`"1i' .. "_ -...:
a
Z
Jv
0
rn
o
Q•� s °°
N +per'
t,% v
6
y
,j
0
� a
C U
o
� a
■. Boa wa -
ow b•nar�
J.
AL
Wag
N
C-1
Li
Y-
�'�
Ta.
339 E., wOT,4'
4tyZ
lo
41!
o'
p
ell
A
,tea
IVY
,-:11, - . - I
A
OF
e �z
so
w
- Iq'W -
--t- �54 U-7PLAk..
rHE IATIF GA 6t LA Fp-J'/4 Fc 0-1
.'yso'4A A v
e YC4ef.nAC.:: 1�j Z4Z1!wrr
TIMEL�E9�� -,i A51ELE% A�NTVIZAL; L-�-RTWI
LWY- T- rl,'RTD4j�v-�; ---
rfp:rtc 11"! -AAA1z V,rv-"M TIA 'trE __THE L.-,QV - -CA FAY;0_A�t�_ mf'vvU"f
TK.f_f�_1��wulnv�_a'xnk - - - *_ -_ - - - - - 7_
A 17 pvzrwTL J7 0 =157. TNP111116�" �� :7
77 1 - rvc
_WA c a-N F u eS. w u- ki 1 T 1+ P I - T v r'r11 a A. Gfj I v F w m A LL, -L 6- e, jv, A-5 W&, A r I
i cZZ5!kjicor__. w I _T 4, 6, ZKW:. I �� t 50--T Kle LIATri�_ 111 MA e' W V, I! I V F W A tP FeV 4V fA 14 t 09 E t"1 FA, 0 1AV,_:k-Mk
MV - _AU."ktq Z0rr.Tq4E5 AAP M5tgPS�.�:__ AAP
K'TI;wT'_ le.,L)ECT GD E
M W fK-,:K)ATCR
A
- I-OcArILIM _MA? .
--- --------- ----
!-(5W) AU-VJZlt
CA 95125
_Pt
AS�A
_1576 VALENCIA FOAM
CA, 95003 _
r v5
CA 4P5071
_7 'fFAAY- F IAN
REVISIONS By
C?
0,
ID
S
O
V
CC a
914t, 20T
JO. NO.
®r,"
Il -F,
th
Pl�
4'OX
,uW
e �z
so
w
- Iq'W -
--t- �54 U-7PLAk..
rHE IATIF GA 6t LA Fp-J'/4 Fc 0-1
.'yso'4A A v
e YC4ef.nAC.:: 1�j Z4Z1!wrr
TIMEL�E9�� -,i A51ELE% A�NTVIZAL; L-�-RTWI
LWY- T- rl,'RTD4j�v-�; ---
rfp:rtc 11"! -AAA1z V,rv-"M TIA 'trE __THE L.-,QV - -CA FAY;0_A�t�_ mf'vvU"f
TK.f_f�_1��wulnv�_a'xnk - - - *_ -_ - - - - - 7_
A 17 pvzrwTL J7 0 =157. TNP111116�" �� :7
77 1 - rvc
_WA c a-N F u eS. w u- ki 1 T 1+ P I - T v r'r11 a A. Gfj I v F w m A LL, -L 6- e, jv, A-5 W&, A r I
i cZZ5!kjicor__. w I _T 4, 6, ZKW:. I �� t 50--T Kle LIATri�_ 111 MA e' W V, I! I V F W A tP FeV 4V fA 14 t 09 E t"1 FA, 0 1AV,_:k-Mk
MV - _AU."ktq Z0rr.Tq4E5 AAP M5tgPS�.�:__ AAP
K'TI;wT'_ le.,L)ECT GD E
M W fK-,:K)ATCR
A
- I-OcArILIM _MA? .
--- --------- ----
!-(5W) AU-VJZlt
CA 95125
_Pt
AS�A
_1576 VALENCIA FOAM
CA, 95003 _
r v5
CA 4P5071
_7 'fFAAY- F IAN
REVISIONS By
C?
0,
ID
S
O
V
CC a
914t, 20T
JO. NO.
Il -F,
th
Pl�
4'OX
,uW
e �z
so
w
- Iq'W -
--t- �54 U-7PLAk..
rHE IATIF GA 6t LA Fp-J'/4 Fc 0-1
.'yso'4A A v
e YC4ef.nAC.:: 1�j Z4Z1!wrr
TIMEL�E9�� -,i A51ELE% A�NTVIZAL; L-�-RTWI
LWY- T- rl,'RTD4j�v-�; ---
rfp:rtc 11"! -AAA1z V,rv-"M TIA 'trE __THE L.-,QV - -CA FAY;0_A�t�_ mf'vvU"f
TK.f_f�_1��wulnv�_a'xnk - - - *_ -_ - - - - - 7_
A 17 pvzrwTL J7 0 =157. TNP111116�" �� :7
77 1 - rvc
_WA c a-N F u eS. w u- ki 1 T 1+ P I - T v r'r11 a A. Gfj I v F w m A LL, -L 6- e, jv, A-5 W&, A r I
i cZZ5!kjicor__. w I _T 4, 6, ZKW:. I �� t 50--T Kle LIATri�_ 111 MA e' W V, I! I V F W A tP FeV 4V fA 14 t 09 E t"1 FA, 0 1AV,_:k-Mk
MV - _AU."ktq Z0rr.Tq4E5 AAP M5tgPS�.�:__ AAP
K'TI;wT'_ le.,L)ECT GD E
M W fK-,:K)ATCR
A
- I-OcArILIM _MA? .
--- --------- ----
!-(5W) AU-VJZlt
CA 95125
_Pt
AS�A
_1576 VALENCIA FOAM
CA, 95003 _
r v5
CA 4P5071
_7 'fFAAY- F IAN
REVISIONS By
C?
0,
ID
S
O
V
CC a
914t, 20T
JO. NO.
IQ�A -- KI -L N - - qt "b
- f,
�
X [51' I-MG f-LINATIO/N.
O
LA
CC c
------------- --
- -- ----
aACAIXT ,rro
7i7YhVATEV-m,-=T.IVF -Non -6140TTevi
. - - -- -
K-7
IQ�A -- KI -L N - - qt "b
- f,
�
X [51' I-MG f-LINATIO/N.
O
LA
CC c
— �f fGE'=- DPJitGN'- VV:z_?/hN f5 �. {'� GIO EYfB PCIO7+ TD "�FC.i4sr� :
_GMLT�SlgL1e cH- i:ETz i= LPGpbL)'F sple ?s 51MIls�" _ -_... -.
�WWeZftc�, plcnr�flxl'C Y", -���r t-��e`tZt�e zr•.u�rmsca�:rH�__-
OE :._
--:.-sck�r•a -. fib � :�I,�ti.__.: -.- - _
__A13. 6L��JNG_'l o +G•_. 'r/OJy -> 5g9u -_P�i. CrwV•yR- 1 Nv -5H A(,.E- _CY :_. .. _
_ =��. vlLT°:: =. SEE:V� -, A;rr.- -:', urcc f1 �:�::$ =a?�L• __ :__.: .- -
- __rJ./.T "}(1GY3 SgFCC zf -7;`JE Nl 11T�iti;hlG(L= A5= 7.Et{V;, 5•; :UEG _T'O�E:EF+FU _ :..:
- -_ TF{e - Hil[___5E: W.°tl�Tl•�G 10hM.,h�t1 :w7 2_FG711 SeP,dlYr: V7{ .L'..
_ l! �Fh' D>_ 6�} TT3ec �zs�i_:— E] SJfi i<:x6o- .g1AT"cgvp-i`.%•aeonC: �i'sE�fz^.iAAS.
.- MAIA- -I.EJ�fsIG1AIG :JkiAL1- @L _i'Ye} - FAINT GP,4l� .S :I iH '�y V GQ�UG. -
: �_ L1N" PDk15._ 5kA!. L: 22_ fJL6Y!.... 76UbtiB :�'f�h1t%_Y.Ilit= 'AV.L -E.:G� `,,. :)f_D1k�..[�F:J
.. :.E}{TR�AEY.' Af-; Mlor.AITtYE T ._ -:LI.. ..cn/a
_.f_AN,ILT: BI!_. _'S_7nb - C.- ':ct:rV, A7 : =H7:VE /I..PTAV. FUJ __T�tE. j H{.0 F'6. ._'.
- ��73N`•+_ -S -�J. 'k/P.L :.P1:.QF NT .GQAiGG �UC?1 7;5... POfIIC�E GhaGe. � ..
__..RAILthIGS,B_Fbt2cNEg,. T1A11: :6E- k_'1u�,_iPINTG{�GE yTf1F�a Ed._.- ._
FUaMf� - - —
j'D7Gi} F{,C��VSG �- IkAIL :'�T1 f+"CT4G V.ALDiLLONI PM N?EV; OVIJL UI PM
_9(OAE WG_°Y: p Fr.'DA. a} Y19V5P: :74F4LL- f.i -,i� 1. !oc[. k5 ?tdw71.,..FAZYIVF
� ti17fVti �,O fG -i tlJ: G'C7 Vt=.NT`.:..55 [ L„3 f t: by UGt.. i LD cavC _.
5W.LI -t -nL- D IVSEI W.F.M. 40VAt2 cOLwANS
SFiMJi "FJ,C -,AiA: Glyn✓ IU V -[lfrw WIZOoRT IL'ON Lwae, I•.56HGWN..... f
VA
�i
CA
ea
c
y� o
w C.
N m
N 0
4d A� p p
N 5
`O o rn
.yC o
r v
L
y
O
RJ o
0 �
U pip
.^I Q
iM ,�•yam/ (p
W i
C -
�23 z A
E
b �
QI N
Vi
N
NI
4
MT,
-AV
Al N
long
�'.Mill
RSVIMO=BV
M ICJ
c.
CG
o
OATE
T
T.
m
11 Ni_. -. T - I II
QI
it 1
st`.e
-L
6Al&
F•F.
f7r
7m
.
rNveE k� f , -1,1 I ;Vq u g 4
1
A
7A -- ---- . .
WNLAr-,ML�AT 7W I•. I,4veT.:.wqT Tlkv!�.T=f. r.7
-TtkC 0 Ayj� tA wiU A6 HAS :oCtN TWf V
_W$oAc 0, IN Tlt6
C W _3,rA Z0AITIV �trA"
_TlkP_.:C?�XW FML'--_1r-A-rA -t- TO
S 0
A
0UTR T1040
7R_ TjL; . j5
��5IF%
alex J
v f�Nvmtl ow-1. "wow-
NG
v.vX-AIi*v - -------
rmmium,
He'Tw,
Awlmlzm rwr,L*c .F.rAr r�p tw-F�
�
uAmr- eci eFA41w" q� IC 46;Are IN
or," Tw
AT
A r;1 CW "L. -r-•; FPI.VVIVP- M.43. S Wltet,Aev V
T+ie- ME '.o
"Jr��-IrAiEr !�""K BWC"S.
IAITP=0;; ItEM, CF TIAE �UiLOA6 (6.�MVFA LX
(Np pI,U6e -i
LI:
-PA,
UTM
----------
•
ZF
....... .. ....
NtV..
------ --- -
51�_COMMYWE TA :IN,
. .....
- ------
----------- - ------
TE.R.,_-SADW
REVISIONS BY
s.
CA
CA
yG
Z
W7
ca
of awesTe