HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-20-2013 City Council Agenda Packet�i
AGENDA
SPECIAL MEETING
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 20, 2013
SPECIAL MEETING — 5:00 P.M. — ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE ROOM,
13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE.
CALL MEETING TO ORDER — 5:00 P.M.
REPORT ON POSTING OF AGENDA
(Pursuant to Gov't. Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on
February 14, 2013)
COMMUNICATIONS FROM COMMISSIONS & PUBLIC
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON NON - AGENDIZED ITEMS
Any member of the public will be allowed to address the City Council for up to three (3)
minutes on matters not on this agenda. The law generally prohibits the council from
discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Council may instruct staff
accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Council Direction to Staff.
COUNCIL DIRECTION TO STAFF
Instruction to Staff regarding actions on current Oral Communications.
ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION — 5:00 P.M.
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov't Code Section 54957.6)
A. Employee organizations: Northern California Carpenters Regional Council,
Carpenters Forty Six Counties Conference Board
Agency designated representatives: Monica LaBossiere and/or Dave Anderson
CALL JOINT MEETING TO ORDER — 6:00 P.M. ADMINISTRATIVE
CONFERENCE ROOM, 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE
1. Joint Meeting with Planning Commission
Recommended Action:
Informational Only
ADJOURNMENT
In accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, copies of the staff reports and other
materials provided to the City Council by City staff in connection with this agenda are
available at the office of the City Clerk at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070.
Note that copies of materials distributed to the City Council concurrently with the posting
of the agenda are also available on the City Website at www.sarato ag ca.us. Any
materials distributed by staff after the posting of the agenda are made available for public
review at the office of the City Clerk at the time they are distributed to the City Council.
In Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at 4081868 -1269. Notification
24 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to
ensure accessibility to this meeting. [28 CFR 35.102- 35.104 ADA title II]
Certificate of Posting of Agenda:
I, Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda
for the meeting of the City Council was posted and available for public review on
February 14, 2013 at the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga, CA 95070
and on the City's website at www.saratoga.ca.us.
Signed this 14th day of February 2013 at Saratoga, California.
Crystal Bothelio
City Clerk
OA
Table of Contents
Agenda. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 2
City Council Meeting Minutes
Staff Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 7
Attachment A: City Council Retreat on January 25, 2013 . .
. . 9
Attachment B: City Council Study Session on February
4, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 19
Attachment C: Special and Regular City Council
Meeting on February 6, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 22
Review of Accounts Payable Check Registers
Staff Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 31
2/6/13 Check Register . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 33
2/12/13 Check Register . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 35
Adoption of City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element
Update and Negative Declaration
Staff Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 40
Attachment A: Resolution Adopting a Negative
Declaration and Revised Safety Element. . . . . . . . . .
. . 43
Attachment B: Revised Safety Element . . . . . . . . . .
. . 69
Attachment C: Revised Safety Element Appendix C —
Ground Movement Potential Map . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 231
Attachment D: Summary of Policy Changes . . . . . . . .
. . 232
Attachment E: Summary of Changes to the Draft Safety
Element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 240
Attachment F: Planning Commission Resolution
Recommending Adoption of Initial Study /Negative
Declaration and Safety Element Update . . . . . . . . . .
. . 244
2013 Movie Night Series Program & Outdoor Movie Equipment
Outdoor Movie Night Series and Outdoor Movie
Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 245
Attachment A: Outdoor Movie Nights_Comparable
Cities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 248
Provide Direction on the Planning Commission's Review of the
Residential Design Review Handbook & Front Yard
Landscaping Standards
staff report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 250
Residential Design Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 252
1
f� 4
t/,n_V A
e n
�
k�
�1
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
REGULAR MEETING — 7:00 P.M. — CIVIC THEATER /COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AT 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
REPORT OF CITY CLERK ON POSTING OF AGENDA
(Pursuant to Gov't. Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on
February 14, 2013)
REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION
COMMUNICATIONS FROM COMMISSIONS & PUBLIC
Oral Communications on Non- Agendized Items
Any member of the public will be allowed to address the City Council for up to three (3)
minutes on matters not on this agenda. The law generally prohibits the council from
discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Council may instruct staff
accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Council Direction to Staff.
Oral Communications - Council Direction to Staff
Instruction to Staff regarding actions on current Oral Communications.
Communications from Boards and Commissions
Council Direction to Staff
Instruction to Staff regarding actions on current Communications from Boards &
Commissions.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
CEREMONIAL ITEMS
None
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None
2
CONSENT CALENDAR
The Consent Calendar contains routine items of business. Items in this section will be
acted in one motion, unless removed by the Mayor or a Council member. Any member of
the public may speak to an item on the Consent Calendar at this time, or request the
Mayor remove an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Public Speakers are
limited to three (3) minutes.
City Council Meeting Minutes
Recommended action:
Approve City Council minutes for the following meetings:
City Council Retreat on January 25, 2013;
City Council Study Session on February 4, 2013; and
Special and Regular City Council Meeting on February 6, 2013.
2. Review of Accounts Payable Check Registers
Recommended action:
Review and accept check registers for the following accounts payable payment
cycles:
2/6/2013
2/12/2013
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Applicants /Appellants and their representatives have a total of ten minutes maximum for
opening statements. Members of the public may comment on any item for up to three
minutes. Applicant /Appellants and their representatives have a total of five minutes
maximum for closing statements. Items requested for continuance are subject to
Council's approval at the Council meeting
3. Adoption of City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update and Negative
Declaration
Recommended action:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:
Open the public hearing and accept public testimony on the General Plan
Amendment and Negative Declaration;
Close the hearing and deliberate; and
Approve resolution (Attachment A) certifying the Negative Declaration and
adopting the revised Safety Element of the City's General Plan.
OLD BUSINESS
4. 2013 Movie Night Series Program & Outdoor Movie Equipment
Recommended action:
Accept report and direct staff to work with Parks and Recreation Commission to
implement 2013 Movie Night Series and to proceed with renting outdoor movie
equipment for the series.
3
NEW BUSINESS
5. Provide Direction on the Planning Commission's Review of the Residential Design
Review Handbook & Front Yard Landscaping Standards
Recommended action:
Provide direction on the scope of review.
ADHOC & AGENCY ASSIGNMENT REPORTS
Mayor Jill Hunter
City School Ad Hoc
Hakone Foundation Board
Hakone Foundation Executive Committee
Historical Foundation
KSAR Community Access TV Board
Village Ad Hoc
West Valley Mayors and Managers Association
Vice Mayor Emily Lo
Hakone Foundation Board
Let's Move City Ad Hoc
Library Joint Powers Authority
Santa Clara Valley Water District Commission
Village Ad Hoc
West Valley Flood Control & Watershed Advisory Committee
Council Member Howard Miller
City School Ad Hoc
Council Finance Committee
Postal Service Liaison
Saratoga Ministerial Association
Valley Transportation Authority PAC
West Valley Solid Waste Management Joint Powers Authority
Council Member Manny Cappello
Chamber of Commerce
County HCD Policy Committee
Highway 9 Ad Hoc
Let's Move City Ad Hoc
Santa Clara County Emergency Council
SASCC
TEA Ad Hoc
Council Member Chuck Page
Association of Bay Area Governments
Highway 9 Ad Hoc
Santa Clara County Cities Association
Santa Clara County Cities Association Selection Committee
Sister City Liaison
TEA Ad Hoc
West Valley Sanitation District
2
CITY COUNCIL ITEMS
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
In accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, copies of the staff reports and other
materials provided to the City Council by City staff in connection with this agenda are
available at the office of the City Clerk at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070.
Note that copies of materials distributed to the City Council concurrently with the posting
of the agenda are also available on the City Website at www.sarato ag ca.us. Any
materials distributed by staff after the posting of the agenda are made available for public
review at the office of the City Clerk at the time they are distributed to the City Council.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special
assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (408) 868 -1269.
Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102- 35.104 ADA Title
II)
Certificate of Posting of Agenda:
I, Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda
for the meeting of the City Council for the City of Saratoga was posted on February 14,
2013, at the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga, CA 95070 and was
available for public review at that location. The agenda is also available on the City's
website at www.saratoga.ca.us
Signed this 14th day of February 2013 at Saratoga, California.
Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk
5
NOTE: To view current or previous City Council meetings anytime, go to the City
Video Archives at www.saratoga.ca.us
-r
a
-�1
02/20
CITY OF SARATOGA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING CALENDAR 2013
Regular Meeting — Joint Meeting with Planning Commission
03/06 Regular Meeting — Joint Meeting with Chamber of Commerce /
Destination Saratoga
03/20 Regular Meeting — Joint Meeting with County Fire
04/03 Regular Meeting — Joint Meeting with Sheriff Office
04/17 Regular Meeting — Joint Meeting with Montalvo Arts
05101 Regular Meeting — Joint Meeting with Youth Commission
05115 Regular Meeting — Joint Meeting with Mountain Winery
06/05 Regular Meeting — Joint Meeting with Hakone Foundation
06/19 Regular Meeting — Joint Meeting with Saratoga/Monte Sereno Foundation
07/03 Regular Meeting — Civic Theater Master Plan Study Session
07/17 RECESS
08/07 RECESS
08/21 Regular Meeting — Joint Meeting with SACSS
09/04 Regular Meeting — Joint Meeting with Parks and Rec /PEBTAC
09/18 Regular Meeting — Joint Meeting with West Valley Board of Trustees
10/02 Regular Meeting — 5:30 p.m. Joint Meeting with Saratoga School Districts
10/16 Regular Meeting — Joint Meeting with Traffic Safety Commission
11/06 Regular Meeting — Joint Meeting with Library Commission and Friends of
the Library
11/20 Regular Meeting — Joint Meeting Sister City Committee
12/04 Regular Meeting — Joint Meeting with Assembly Member Paul Fong and
Jim Beall
12/18 Regular Meeting — Joint Meeting TBD
0
u �
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
RL ?FVx1�`�
MEETING DATE: February 20, 2013 AGENDA ITEM:
DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office CITY MANAGER: Dave Anderson
PREPARED BY: Crystal Bothelio DIRECTOR: Dave Anderson
City Clerk
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve City Council minutes for the following meetings:
- City Council Retreat on January 25, 2013;
- City Council Study Session on February 4, 2013; and
- Special and Regular City Council Meeting on February 6, 2013.
BACKGROUND:
The draft minutes for the City Council Retreat on January 25, 2013, City Council Study Session
on February 4, 2013, and Special and Regular City Council Meeting on February 6, 2013 are
attached to this report for Council review and approval.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
N/A
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING THE RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
N/A
ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S):
h//s1
FOLLOW UP ACTION(S):
Retain minutes for legislative history.
ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT:
Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, this item was properly posted as a City Council agenda
item and was included in the packet made available on the City's web site in advance of the
Page 1 of 2
7
meeting. A copy of the agenda packet is also made available at the Saratoga Branch Library each
Monday in advance of the Council meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: City Council Retreat on January 25, 2013
Attachment B: City Council Study Session on February 4, 2013
Attachment C: Special and Regular City Council Meeting on February 6, 2013
Page 2 of 2
MINUTES
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL RETREAT
SARATOGA PROSPECT CENTER
JANUARY 25, 2013
Mayor Jill Hunter called the meeting to order at 9:04 a.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT Council Members Chuck Page, Manny Cappello, Howard Miller,
Vice Mayor Emily Lo, Mayor Jill Hunter
ABSENT: None
ALSO PRESENT: Dave Anderson, City Manager
Richard Taylor, City Attorney
Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk
John Cherbone, Public Works Director
Mary Furey, Finance and Administrative Services Director
James Lindsay, Community Development Director
Michael Taylor, Recreation and Facilities Director
Monica LaBossiere, Human Resource Manager
Christopher Riordan, Senior Planner
Mainini Cabute, Administrative Analyst II
REPORT OF CITY CLERK ON POSTING OF THE AGENDA
City Clerk Crystal Bothelio reported that pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting
was property posted on January 17, 2013.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM COMMISSIONS & PUBLIC
Oral Communications on Non- Aundized Items
Library Commissioner Steven Schlosser recommended that the street sweeping schedule be adjusted to occur
more frequently during the fall months when trees drop leaves and cause storm drain obstructions when it rains.
Street sweeping could be reduced during other months when there are fewer fallen leaves.
AGENDA TOPICS
1. FINANCE OVERVIEW
MID -YEAR BUDGET STATUS:
Finance and Administrative Services Director Mary Furey provided a mid -year status report on the Fiscal
Year (FY) 2012/13 budget. She shared that the City has seen an increase in revenues from property taxes,
franchise fees, transient occupancy taxes, construction taxes, development revenues, and a reimbursement
from the Sheriff. As a result, revenues are expected to be higher than initially projected.
D
5 -YEAR FORECAST:
Finance and Administrative Services Director Mary Furey then presented a 5 -year forecast to the City
Council, including budget assumptions and an explanation of the conservative forecasting model used by
the City.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Library Commissioner Steven Schlosser suggested that the City consider less conservative investments.
FISCAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES:
Finance and Administrative Services Director Mary Furey presented the proposed fund balance reserve
policies. She explained that prior to this revision, the policies were silent on all but the General Fund
reserves and the General Fund reserve descriptions were limited in definition and scope. The revisions
include a more complete written description and purpose for each of the reserves. Additionally, some of the
reserve fund names and classifications have been changed to comply with Government Finance Officers
Association standards.
Council Member Miller added that the Finance Committee spent a considerable amount of time reviewing
the policies, including their respective purposes and conditions that would warrant use of the various
reserves. Careful attention was paid to cash flow requirements during emergency situations.
Finance and Administrative Services Director Mary Furey provided an overview of the three new General
Fund reserve policies — Compensated Absences Reserve, Council Discretionary Reserve, and Facility
Replacement Reserve.
City Manager Dave Anderson provided additional information about the need for a Facility Replacement
Reserve and shared that Recreation and Facilities Director Michael Taylor is in the process of obtaining an
appraisal of City buildings. With the estimated value of City buildings and approximate replacement costs,
the City can slowly set aside money in the Facility Replacement Reserve that can be used to pay for
replacement costs if any City buildings are replaced in the future.
Council Member Miller stated that the City has not had a practice of using bonds to pay for large facility
improvement or replacement projects. The Facility Replacement Reserve may reduce or eliminate the need
for a loan or bond should City buildings need to be replaced. He added that the reserve policy is not meant
for facility replacement in the near future. It is a long -term policy that will allow for any necessary building
replacements far in the future.
Council Member Page raised concerns about the differences between the Facility Replacement Reserve
under Proposed General Fund Reserves and the Building Maintenance Fund and Vehicle and Equipment
Replacement Fund under the Internal Service Fund Reserves. He asked that the descriptions more clearly
distinguish between reserves used for operational and cash flow purposes from those that will build over
time for known unfunded costs in the future.
Council Member Page also asked that the conditions that allow use of reserve policies be reasonable, so that
reserves can be used for their intended purposes when needed.
2
10
Council Member Miller suggested that the Finance Committee analyze the correct funding amount for
reserves based on their purpose and identify reserves that serve similar functions that can be combined.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Library Commissioner Steven Schlosser shared his observation that the differences between private and
public sector policies on benefits have become more tilted.
COUNCIL DIRECTION:
Council directed the Finance Committee to:
- Clarify the definitions of reserve funds from operational funds.
- Analyze the appropriate funding level for the various reserve funds
- Identify potential overlap among funds and consolidate funds when possible
- Return with revised fiscal management policies at the April 22, 2013 Budget Study Session
FUND BALANCE ALLOCATIONS:
Finance and Administrative Services Director Mary Furey discussed the following proposed fund balance
allocations:
- Hillside Reserve - $300,000
- Compensated Absence Reserve - $200,000
- Ca1PERS Side Fund Payoff - $225,000
Council Member Miller indicated that he supported the recommended fund balance allocations.
Mayor Hunter said she was in support of the staff recommendations.
Vice Mayor Lo said she was in agreement with the proposed fund balance allocations.
Council Member Page said he was also in favor of the proposed fund balance allocations returning to the
City Council for approval during the mid -year budget adjustments scheduled for February 6, 2013.
Council Member Cappello added that he was supportive of the proposed fund balance allocations.
Finance and Administrative Services Director Mary Furey discussed proposed mid -year revenue and
expenditure adjustments, which are scheduled to go before Council for approval on February 6, 2013.
Recreation and Facilities Director Michael Taylor shared a pro bono conceptual plan for the Civic Theater
prepared by a local architect. He explained that a more detailed master plan would cost roughly $60,000,
which would include a public engagement process and more refined cost estimates for implementation of
the plan.
Council Member Miller observed the conceptual plan eliminated options for an orchestra pit and stated he
would like the plans, if Council authorizes development of a master plan, to include an orchestra pit.
Council Member Page shared that he hopes that, if approved, the master plan would enhance the theater-
going experience. Improving conditions for Council Meetings is not as high of a priority.
11
COUNCIL DIRECTION:
- Council directed staff to include the following in the mid -year budget adjustments:
• Hillside Reserve - $300,000
• Compensated Absence Reserve - $200,000
• Ca1PERS Side Fund Payoff - $225,000
• Proposed revenue adjustments
• Proposed expenditure adjustment
- Add the Civic Theater Master Plan to a future City Council meeting
2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WORK PLAN
Community Development Director James Lindsay presented his report on the proposed work plan items for
the Community Development Department, which include updating the general plan noise element and
ordinance, recommendations from the Planning Commission, retail sale of wine and beer for offsite
consumption, and miscellaneous code amendments.
PROPOSED 2013 PLANNING COMMISSION WORK PLAN
Community Development Director James Lindsay provided an overview of the items that the Planning
Commission would like to add to its work plan for 2013, which include an update to the Residential Design
Handbook, a review of building height limits in the C -V and C -N zoning districts, new residential front yard
landscape standards, and stronger residential green building standards.
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN HANDBOOK
Council Member Cappello shared that he thought any changes to the Residential Design Handbook would
need to be carefully balanced so that the Handbook does not become too restrictive or flexible. He also
expressed concern that an update to the Residential Design Handbook would consume a significant amount
of time.
Planning Commission Chair Tina Walia shared that her goals for the update to the handbook are to provide
homeowners with some flexibility, establish a simple process that does not prescribe specific design styles
for all residential neighborhoods, and allow the Commission to make more objective, fair, and consistent
decisions.
Council Member Howard Miller echoed Council Member Cappello's concerns, stating that he feared an
update would result in prescribed style for homes. He also said he worried the handbook would become a
means by which residents block projects from happening.
Planning Commissioner Joyce Hlava added that she felt that the Commission, with the guidance of the
Community Development Director, would be able to complete the update in a timely manner.
Council Member Chuck Page concurred with the issues raised by Council Member Cappello and Council
Member Miller about the potential to create a de -facto house design through the update of the handbook. He
asked how the update process would work and if there would be site visits or outreach meetings.
4
12
Community Development Director James Lindsay responded that staff and the Planning Commission would
review best practices of other cities, tour the City for good examples, hold study sessions that are widely
publicized to the public, and then return to the Council with a recommendation.
Council Member Chuck Page also said he feared the update to the guidelines could be used to stop new
projects from happening.
Mayor Jill Hunter inquired about the benefit of an update handbook to staff.
Planning Commissioner Mary -Lynne Bernald added that when residents are opposed to a project, they
usually voice concerns about impacts to their privacy. Complaints about design features are far less
common.
Planning Commission Chair Tina Walia shared that the Planning Commission struggles with what it means
for a design to be compatible with a neighborhood. She hopes the update will help bring some clarity to
what this means.
Council Member Miller stated he would support adding the update to the Residential Design Handbook to
the Planning Commission's work plan, but requested that the Council discuss specific direction to the
Commission before the Commission begins the update process.
Council Member Cappello said he felt that some findings are intentionally subjective, allowing the Planning
Commission to exercise its best judgment and allow for some flexibility for special circumstances.
Council Member Page added he felt the guidelines should only refer to the exterior of a residential building,
provide examples of elements that allow a home to fit into a neighborhood, and better illustrate what
unreasonable interference with privacy means.
BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITS IN THE C -V AND C -N ZONING DISTRICTS
Mayor Jill Hunter asked if a review of building height limits in the C -V and C -N zoning districts would
include provisions for public input and participation.
Community Development Director James Lindsay said that there would be 1 or 2 study sessions on the topic
and the City would conduct targeted outreach to the communities near the C -V and C -N districts.
Council Member Miller supported including review of building height limits in the C -V and C -N zoning
districts in the Planning Commission's work plan.
NEW RESIDENTIAL FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE STANDARDS
Council Member Miller noted he worried that creation of front yard landscape standards could become too
restrictive.
Planning Commissioner Mary -Lynne Bernald shared that the Commission would not necessarily require all
front yards to include green lawns. However, it would be helpful to have some provision to require designs
to include some plans to break up concrete frontages.
13
Planning Commission Joyce Hlava added that she is not interested in prescribing particular landscape types
or styles. However, she would like the City to have something that require property owners to have some
landscaping in their front yard.
STRONGER RESIDENTIAL GREEN B UILDING STANDARDS
Council Member Miller wondered if homeowners who exceed minimum green building standards could be
recognized and if there is a way to incentivize going above and beyond the minimum requirements.
Planning Commissioner David Reis observed that people responded well to the City's green building point
system.
Council Member Page added that many builders recognized the value of following green building standards
as it saved money and appealed to clients. He also stated an interest in incentivizing exceeding green
building standards instead of requiring builders to meet new standards imposed by the City.
Council Member Cappello raised concerns that stronger green building standards would increase project
costs.
Council Member Lo asked about the timeline required to implement increased green building standards.
Community Development Director James Lindsay said it could be done by the end of the year, when the
City adopts the new State Building Code.
Council Member Lo said she supported the proposed Planning Commission work plan, with the exception
of the stronger green building standards. She stated that she preferred to allow property owners and builders
to voluntarily exceed the minimum standards required by the State. She also emphasized the importance of
neutrality during the Planning Commission's decision process on the other work plan items. She said she
did not want to see more restrictions or for City standards to become too flexible.
Council Member Miller restated that he supported all the proposed Planning Commission work plan items.
Council Member Cappello said he was also in support of adding the proposed items to the Planning
Commission work plan. He emphasized the importance of public involvement in the review of building
heights in the C -V and C -N zoning districts. He added that he preferred review of height limits before the
Residential Design Handbook.
Council Member Page concurred with Council Member Cappello and added that he would like to see
updates to the green building standards emphasize incentives and acknowledgement.
Mayor Hunter shared that she feared it would be very difficult to make changes to the height limits in the C-
V and C -N zoning districts and encouraged the Planning Commission to thoroughly review the matter. She
also said she was in support of the review of the Residential Design Handbook.
COUNCIL DIRECTION:
Council directed staff to add the following items, listed according to priority, to the Planning Commission
work plan:
1) Noise Element /Ordinance
0
14
2) Review of Building Height Limit in C -V and C -N Zoning Districts
3) Update to Residential Design Handbook
4) Residential Front Yard Landscape Standards
5) Green Building Standards
RETAIL SALE OF WINE AND BEER FOR OFFSITE CONSUMPTION
Council Member Page stated that he felt retail sale of beer and wine could be permitted when it meets
certain criteria, such as when it is an incidental to the main purpose of the business. The City might be able
to achieve this by allowing retail sale of beer and wine as a permitted use when no more than 500 square
feet or 25% of the floor space, whichever is less, is dedicated to beer and wine sales.
Council Member Miller said he liked Council Member Page's suggestion.
Council Member Cappello said he was interested in Council Member Page's suggestion.
Mayor Hunter she was not in favor of allowing beer or wine sales as a permitted use. She shared her
concerns that it will become too easy for people to obtain alcohol.
Community Development Director James Lindsay sought clarification to see if Council would like to
include limits on the hours of operation for businesses that sell wine and beer as a permitted use.
Both Council Member Cappello and Council Member Page said that they did not feel limitations on hours
of operation were necessary.
COUNCIL DIRECTION:
The Council directed the Planning Commission to return to the Council with a recommended ordinance
allowing retail sale of beer and wine as a permitted use when no more than 500 square feet or 25% of the
floor space, whichever is less, is dedicated to beer and wine sales.
MISCELLANEOUS CODE AMENDMENTS
Council Member Miller indicated he was in favor of moving forward with the proposed miscellaneous code
amendments presented by staff.
Council Member Cappello also said he was supportive of the miscellaneous code amendments
recommended by staff.
Council Member Page suggested that the definition of a medical office in the City Code should align with
the definition used by the sanitary districts that serve Saratoga. He also asked that changes in the definition
of kitchen and single dwelling in the City Code refer to kitchens inside a residence, as opposed to outdoor
kitchens.
Council Member Miller echoed Council Member Page's concerns that changes in the definition of kitchen
would cause outdoor kitchens to trigger conflicts with the definition of a single dwelling.
Vice Mayor Lo asked if there was an interest among the Council in consideration of a single use /plastic bag
ban, similar to the ban that took effect in San Jose.
7
15
COUNCIL DIRECTION:
Council directed staff to include the proposed Miscellaneous Code Amendments in the Community
Development Department Work Plan. The Miscellaneous Code Amendments include:
- Update National Pollution Discharge Elimination System References
- Right of Entry to Inspect Abandoned Vehicles
- Update Definition of Tobacco Products in Chapter 15 — Zoning Regulations
- Basements — Geotechnical Review & Light Wells
- Single Family Home Kitchen Definition
- Appeal Period of a Recommendation issued by the Heritage Preservation Commission
- Medical Office Professional Office Definitions
- Clarification to Non - Conforming Structures
- Clarification of Administrative Design Review of Major Additions
- Story Poles Requirement Clarification
- Limitation on Temporary Special Event Signage
LUNCH
The City Council took a break for lunch at 12:30 p.m.
3. PROCESS OPTIONS FOR STRATEGIC PLANNING
The City Council concluded its lunch break and returned to the meeting at 1:00 p.m.
City Manager Dave Anderson presented a brief report on strategic planning process options.
Council Member Miller recognized that conducting a strategic plan in accordance with International
City /County Management Association (ICMA) best practices would involve considerable public
participation and would be an expensive project.
Planning Commissioner Joyce Hlava shared that the City used to conduct a planning process with the
Commissions every year. The process was similar to what the Commissions now do to prepare work plans.
Mayor Hunter shared that while the community is very diverse and each member of the Council seems to
represent a unique segment of the community, she has always believed that there has been a shared belief
that Saratoga is a respite from the rest of Silicon Valley.
Council Member Cappello commented that all the members of the Council seem to have their own vision of
what Saratoga should be. However, the City has never undergone a formal strategic planning process that
included the community. A formal strategic planning with public participation and conducted in accordance
with ICMA best practices is really the best way to define a vision for the City. The process may be
expensive, but is something the City should do when all of the General Plan elements have been updated
and are current.
Mayor Hunter remarked upon the time commitment of strategic planning, which she experienced as a
School Board Member.
Council Member Miller noted that while the City's mission statement was prepared in the 1990s, it still
seems to resonate with the members of the Council. However, if the City prepared a strategic plan with
16
extensive community involvement then the Council would know whatever goals, mission statements, or
values that come out of the process are a reflection of the community.
Council Member Lo stated that if the City were to create a strategic plan, then she felt the plan should be
revisited and revised every 10 years.
Planning Commission Mary -Lynne Bemald suggested adding the City's mission statement to the City
website.
Council Member Miller asked to include the date of adoption with the mission statement on the City's
website.
COUNCIL DIRECTION:
The City Council directed staff to schedule the strategic plan to take place after all the elements of the
General Plan, including the Noise Element and Housing Element, are current.
At 1:30 p.m., the City Council took a 15- minute recess.
4. DREAM OUTSIDE THE BOX: WHAT DO WE WANT FOR SARATOGA IN THE FUTURE?
City Clerk Crystal Bothelio introduced the ideation exercise.
Audience members were invited to write down their ideas for the future of Saratoga down on index cards
then insert them into a bucket. After all the ideas were collected, all of the cards were read out loud and
some of the submissions were discussed.
5. RETREAT WRAP UP
Mayor Hunter and City Manager Dave Anderson provided an overview of the Council direction received
during the Council Retreat.
FINANCE OVERVIEW — COUNCIL DIRECTION
FISCAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES:
Council provided direction to the Finance Committee and staff to:
- Clarify the definitions of reserve funds from operational funds.
- Analyze the appropriate funding level for the various reserve funds
- Identify potential overlap among funds and consolidate funds when possible
- Return with revised fiscal management policies at the April 22, 2013 Budget Study Session
FUND BALANCE ALLOCATIONS AND MID -YEAR BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS:
Include the following in the mid -year budget adjustments:
- Hillside Reserve - $300,000
- Compensated Absence Reserve - $200,000
- Ca1PERS Side Fund Payoff - $225,000
- Proposed revenue adjustments
- Proposed expenditure adjustment
Council also directed staff to add the Civic Theater Master Plan to a future City Council meeting agenda.
0
17
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WORK PLAN — COUNCIL DIRECTION
PROPOSED 2013 PLANNING COMMISSION WORK PLAN
Council directed staff to include the following items, listed based on priority, in the 2013 Planning
Commission Work Plan:
1) Noise Element /Ordinance
2) Review of Building Height Limit in C -V and C -N Zoning Districts
3) Update to Residential Design Handbook
4) Residential Front Yard Landscape Standards
5) Green Building Standards
RETAIL SALE OF WINE AND BEER FOR OFFSITE CONSUMPTION
The Council directed the Planning Commission to return to the Council with a recommended ordinance
allowing retail sale of beer and wine as a permitted use when no more than 500 square feet or 25% of the
floor space, whichever is less, is dedicated to beer and wine sales.
MISCELLANEOUS CODE AMENDMENTS
Council directed staff to include the all of the proposed Miscellaneous Code Amendments in the
Community Development Department Work Plan, including
- Update National Pollution Discharge Elimination System References
- Right of Entry to Inspect Abandoned Vehicles
- Update Definition of Tobacco Products in Chapter 15 — Zoning Regulations
- Basements — Geotechnical Review & Light Wells
- Single Family Home Kitchen Definition
- Appeal Period of a Recommendation issued by the Heritage Preservation Commission
- Medical Office Professional Office Definitions
- Clarification to Non - Conforming Structures
- Clarification of Administrative Design Review of Major Additions
- Story Poles Requirement Clarification
- Limitation on Temporary Special Event Signage
PROCESS OPTIONS FOR STRATEGIC PLANNING — COUNCIL DIRECTION
Council directed staff to schedule preparation of a strategic plan to take place after all of the General Plan
elements have been updated and are current, including updates to the Noise Element and Housing Element.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 3:00 p.m.
Minutes respectfully submitted:
Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk
10
im
MINUTES
FEBRUARY 4, 2013
SARATOGA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SAFETY ELEMENT UPDATE STUDY SESSION
SARATOGA CITY HALL — ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE ROOM
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
Mayor Hunter called the Special Meeting to order at 6:06 p.m. in the City Hall Administrative
Conference at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT Council Members Chuck Page, Manny Cappello, Howard Miller,
Vice Mayor Emily Lo, Mayor Jill Hunter
ABSENT: None
ALSO PRESENT: Dave Anderson, City Manager
Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk
John Cherbone, Public Works Director
James Lindsay, Community Development Director
Cynthia McCormick, Planner
Aaron Pfannenstiel, RBF Consulting Project Manager
Jim Yoke, Santa Clara County Fire Department Emergency
Services Coordinator
REPORT ON POSTING OF AGENDA
City Clerk Crystal Bothelio reported that pursuant to Gov't. Code 54954.2, the agenda for this
meeting was properly posted on January 31, 2013.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM COMMISSIONS & PUBLIC
Oral Communications on Non- Aundized Items
None
Council Direction to Staff
None
1. City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
Recommended Action:
Review, consider, ask questions, and discuss the proposed update to the Safety Element
of the City of Saratoga General Plan.
19
City Clerk Crystal Bothelio introduced Aaron Pfannenstiel, Project Manager with RBF
Consulting.
Aaron Pfannenstiel provided a presentation on the proposed update to the Safety Element
of the City's General Plan, including an overview of the update process and proposed
changes.
Council Member Miller asked that the area of potential inundation near Highway 85 on
Exhibit 5 — Dam Failure Inundation Areas be confirmed. The exhibit shows potential
inundation in the northeast portion of the map ending at Highway 85, even though
Saratoga Creek continues past Highway 85.
Council Member Miller asked that Exhibit 8 — Evacuation Routes be updated to include
Mount Eden Road be included as an evacuation route.
Council Member Cappello also requested that Mount Eden Road be added as an
evacuation route.
Council Member Miller observed that there are a high number of trees within the City,
creating a greater amount of fuel load. He asked that fuel load, in terms of number of
trees, be addressed in the policy statements of the Safety Element. The language on fuel
load should address both mitigation and response components.
City Manager Dave Anderson proposed including language on partnership with the Santa
Clara County FireSafe Council to reduce fire load in the City's Wildland -Urban Interface
and prepare Community Wildfire Protection Plan for hillside areas that are most
vulnerable to wildfires.
Council Member Miller moved to remove Policy SAF -4.3. There was no second to the
motion. Council Member Miller withdrew his motion.
PAGE/MILLER MOVED TO DISCUSS REMOVAL OF POLICY SAF -4.3 WITH
THE SARATOGA FIRE DISTRICT COMMISSIONERS AND REMOVE THIS
SECTION IF THE FIRE COMMISSIONERS ARE AMENABLE TO IT. MOTION
PASSED. AYES: PAGE, CAPPELLO, MILLER, LO, HUNTER. NOES: NONE.
ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE.
COUNCIL DIRECTION:
The City Council directed staff to make the following changes to the draft Safety
Element:
Remove directional arrows Exhibit 8 — Evacuation Routes
Remove removal of primary and secondary route distinctions on Exhibit 8 —
Evacuation Routes
Add Mount Eden Road and Norton Road as evacuation routes on Exhibit 8 —
Evacuation Routes
0
20
Add language to the policy section of the Safety Element that indicates that the
City will work with the Santa Clara County FireSafe Council to reduce of fuel
load in the City's Wildland -Urban Interface and Community Wildfire Protection
Plan to address concerns regarding fire mitigation and response.
ADJOURNMENT
Page/Lo moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:32 p.m. Motion passed. AYES: PAGE, CAPPELLO,
MILLER, LO, HUNTER. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE.
Minutes respectfully submitted:
Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk
21
MINUTES
FEBRUARY 6, 2013
SARATOGA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The Saratoga City Council called a joint meeting with the Saratoga Ministerial
Association to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Administrative Conference Room at City Hall at
13777 Fruitvale Avenue.
SARATOGA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 6:59 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT Council Members Chuck Page, Manny Cappello, Howard Miller,
Vice Mayor Emily Lo, Mayor Jill Hunter
ABSENT: None
ALSO PRESENT: Dave Anderson, City Manager
Richard Taylor, City Attorney
Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk
John Cherbone, Public Works Director
Mary Furey, Finance and Administrative Services Director
James Lindsay, Community Development Director
Michael Taylor, Recreation and Facilities Director
REPORT OF CITY CLERK ON POSTING OF AGENDA
City Clerk Crystal Bothelio reported that pursuant to Gov't. Code 54954.2, the agenda for
this meeting was properly posted on January 31, 2013.
REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Hunter announced that there was nothing to report from Closed Session.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM COMMISSIONS & PUBLIC
Oral Communications on Non- Agendized Items
None
Oral Communications - Council Direction to Staff
None
Communications from Boards and Commissions
Kevin Cole, with the Saratoga Church of Latter Day Saints, provided an overview of the
City Council's Joint Meeting with the Saratoga Ministerial Association.
Council Direction to Staff
None
22
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council Member Miller made an announcement about available class offerings listed in
the Saratoga Winter Recreation Activity Guide. Classes for all ages and interests are still
open.
Council Member Cappello announced that the Saratoga Area Senior Coordinating
Council ( SASCC) will be hosting "A Night in Tuscany" on March 8, 2013 from 6:00
p.m. to 9:00 p.m. The event will feature an Italian dinner and music by Jerry Saucedaand.
More information is available on the SASCC website at www.sascc.org /.
Council Member Lo shared that Silicon Valley Reads 2013 started on January 30 and
runs until April. This year, the theme of Silicon Valley Reads is "Invisible Wounds of
War." A series of activities based on the theme, including lectures, films, panel
discussions, and more will be taking place at Santa Clara County Libraries during Silicon
Valley Reads. For more information, visit http: / /siliconvalleyreads.org.
Mayor Hunter invited everyone to post their love notes in Village storefronts in
celebration of Valentine's Day. She also shared that the Saratoga Village Development
Council's Pet Parade and St. Paddy's Day Parry are coming up. She then announced the
City is accepting applications for the Heritage Preservation Commission with
applications due February 26, 2013, the Planning Commission with applications due
March 12, 2013, and the application deadline for the Community Event Grant program is
March 6, 2013.
CEREMONIAL ITEMS
None
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
City Council Meeting Minutes
Recommended action:
Approve City Council minutes for the Special and Regular Meeting on January 16,
2013.
MILLER/PAGE MOVED TO APPROVE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FOR
THE SPECIAL AND REGULAR MEETING ON JANUARY 16 2013.
MOTION PASSED. AYES: PAGE, CAPPELLO, MILLER, LO, HUNTER. NOES:
NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE.
OA
23
2. Review of Accounts Payable Check Registers
Recommended action:
Review and accept check registers for the following accounts payable payment
cycles:
1/15/2013
1/22/2013
1/29/2013
MILLER/PAGE MOVED TO REVIEW AND ACCEPT CHECK REGISTERS
FOR THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAYMENT CYCLES:
1/15/2013,1/22/2013, AND 1/29/2013. MOTION PASSED. AYES: PAGE,
CAPPELLO, MILLER, LO, HUNTER. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE.
ABSTAIN: NONE.
3. Treasurer's Report for the Month Ended December 31, 2012
Recommended action:
Review and accept the Treasurer's Report for the month ended December 31, 2012.
MILLER/PAGE MOVED TO REVIEW AND ACCEPT THE TREASURER'S
REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012. MOTION
PASSED. AYES: PAGE, CAPPELLO, MILLER, LO, HUNTER. NOES: NONE.
ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE.
4. Miscellaneous Plan Employer Side Fund Elimination
Recommended action:
Review report and authorize a lump -sum payment to the California Public Employees
Retirement System (Ca1PERS) for the remaining balance due on the City's
Miscellaneous Plan Employer Side Fund.
Resolution No. 13 -004
MILLER/PAGE MOVED TO AUTHORIZE A LUMP -SUM PAYMENT TO
THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
(CALPERS) FOR THE REMAINING BALANCE DUE ON THE CITY'S
MISCELLANEOUS PLAN EMPLOYER SIDE FUND. MOTION PASSED.
AYES: PAGE, CAPPELLO, MILLER, LO, HUNTER. NOES: NONE. ABSENT:
NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE.
5. Approval of Sport User Agreements - 2013
Recommended action:
Approve Sport User Agreements with American Youth Soccer Organization,
Saratoga Little League, Quito Little League, De Anza Youth Soccer League, West
Valley Lacrosse Club, West Valley Youth Soccer League, Saratoga Pony League, and
Los Altos -Mt. View Pony League for the use of Saratoga City parks and Prospect
High School for organized sport use, and authorize the City Manager to execute the
same.
24
MILLER/PAGE MOVED TO APPROVE SPORT USER AGREEMENTS WITH
AMERICAN YOUTH SOCCER ORGANIZATION, SARATOGA LITTLE
LEAGUE, QUITO LITTLE LEAGUE, DE ANZA YOUTH SOCCER
LEAGUE, WEST VALLEY LACROSSE CLUB, WEST VALLEY YOUTH
SOCCER LEAGUE, SARATOGA PONY LEAGUE, AND LOS ALTOS -MT.
VIEW PONY LEAGUE FOR THE USE OF SARATOGA CITY PARKS AND
PROSPECT HIGH SCHOOL FOR ORGANIZED SPORT USE, AND
AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE SAME. MOTION
PASSED. AYES: PAGE, CAPPELLO, MILLER, LO, HUNTER. NOES: NONE.
ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE.
6. Agreement for Stream Bank Erosion and Storm Drain Outfall Repair along Calabazas
Creek
Recommended action:
Approve the Cooperative Agreement between the City of Saratoga and the Santa
Clara Valley Water District for Stream Bank Erosion and Storm Drain Outfall Repair
along Calabazas Creek downstream of Wardell Road and authorize the City Manager
to execute the same.
MILLER/PAGE MOVED TO APPROVE THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF SARATOGA AND THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY
WATER DISTRICT FOR STREAM BANK EROSION AND STORM DRAIN
OUTFALL REPAIR ALONG CALABAZAS CREEK DOWNSTREAM OF
WARDELL ROAD AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE THE SAME. MOTION PASSED. AYES: PAGE, CAPPELLO,
MILLER, LO, HUNTER. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE.
7. Renewal of Heritage Orchard Maintenance Contract
Recommended action:
Approve a five -year service contract with Matthew Novakovich for landscape
maintenance of the Heritage Orchard in the amount of $98,320 per year and authorize
City Manager to execute the same.
MILLER/PAGE MOVED TO APPROVE A FIVE -YEAR SERVICE
CONTRACT WITH MATTHEW NOVAKOVICH FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE OF THE HERITAGE ORCHARD IN THE AMOUNT OF
$98,320 PER YEAR AND AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
THE SAME. MOTION PASSED. AYES: PAGE, CAPPELLO, MILLER, LO,
HUNTER. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE.
8. Amendment to Contract for Ground Movement Potential Mapping
Recommended action:
Approve an amendment to an existing contract with Cotton, Shires and Associates,
Inc. for additional mapping work in the amount of $17,000.
MILLER/PAGE MOVED TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING
CONTRACT WITH COTTON SHIRES AND ASSOCIATES INC. FOR
ADDITIONAL MAPPING WORK IN THE AMOUNT OF $17,000. MOTION
PASSED. AYES: PAGE, CAPPELLO, MILLER, LO, HUNTER. NOES: NONE.
ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE.
4
25
9. ZOAl2 -0011 — City Initiated Amendments to Article 15 -06 (Market Definition) and
Section 15- 19.020 of the City Code
Recommended action:
Waive the second reading and adopt the ordinance amending the City Code to define
market and establish when a market can be permitted or conditional use.
ORDINANCE NO. 302
MILLER/PAGE MOVED TO WAIVE THE SECOND READING AND ADOPT
THE ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE TO DEFINE MARKET
AND ESTABLISH WHEN A MARKET CAN BE PERMITTED OR
CONDITIONAL USE. MOTION PASSED. AYES: PAGE, CAPPELLO, MILLER,
LO, HUNTER. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
OLD BUSINESS
10. Approval of Village Streetscape Improvements Phase 2
Recommended action:
Approve design elements connected to the Village Streetscape Improvements Project
— Phase 2.
Public Works Director John Cherbone presented the staff report on the item.
Mayor Hunter invited public comment on the item.
No one requested to speak.
LO /PAGE MOVED TO APPROVE DESIGN ELEMENTS CONNECTED TO
THE VILLAGE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT — PHASE 2.
Council Member Miller requested a friendly amendment to the motion. He asked that
the motion include direction to staff to consider removal and replacement of the three
liquid amber trees next to Blaney Plaza if the trees are expected to cause damage to
the sidewalk or other improvements implemented as part of Village Streetscape
Improvements Project — Phase 2. He added that replacement trees should be sizable.
Council Members Lo and Page accepted the friendly amendment.
5
26
LO/PAGE MOVED TO APPROVE DESIGN ELEMENTS CONNECTED TO
THE VILLAGE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT — PHASE 2
AND DIRECTED STAFF TO REMOVE THE THREE LIQUID AMBER
TREES NEXT TO BLANEY PLAZA IF THE CITY ARBORISTS EXPECTS
THAT THE TREES WILL CAUSE FUTURE DAMAGE AND REPLACE THE
TREES WITH SIZEABLE TREES THAT WILL NOT DAMAGE STREETS
OR SIDEWALKS WHILE MAINTAINING THE AMBIANCE OF THE
STREET. MOTION PASSED. AYES: PAGE, CAPPELLO, MILLER, LO,
HUNTER. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE.
NEW BUSINESS
11. Provide Direction on the Planning Commission's Review of Heights Limits in the C-
V and C -N Zoning Districts
Recommended action:
Provide direction on the scope of review.
Community Development Director James Lindsay provided the staff report on item.
Mayor Hunter invited public comment.
The following people requested to speak:
Trish Cypher spoke in opposition to raising building height and therefore density.
Jeff Schwarz spoke in favor of reducing multi - family building height limits and
maintaining commercial building height limits in the C -V and C -N zoning districts.
Yorke Lee spoke in favor of increasing commercial building heights
Nancy Gimmelo spoke in favor of maintaining low building heights.
Lori Ellingboe spoke in favor of maintaining current height standards.
Shahid Siddique spoke in favor of maintaining height limits in the El Quito
neighborhood.
No one else requested to speak.
MILLER/PAGE MOVED TO DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO
REVIEW BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITS IN THE C -V AND C -N ZONING
DISTRICT.
Council Member Page requested a friendly amendment to the motion that would
create continuity between the height limit of multi - family residential buildings and
other height limits in C -V and C -N districts.
Council Member Miller accepted the amendment and restated the motion.
Co
27
MILLER/PAGE MOVED TO DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO
REVIEW BUILDING HEIGHTS LIMITS IN THE C -V AND C -N ZONING
DISTRICT WITH SPECIAL CONSIDERATION GIVEN TO THE
UNIQUENESS OF THE ASSOCIATED COMMUNITIES, CONNECTION
BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS, HOW THE CURRENT
HEIGHT LIMITS INCENTIVIZE CERTAIN BUILDING TYPES, AND
DIRECTED THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ONLY CONSIDER
BUILDING HEIGHT — NOT DENSITY. MOTION PASSED. AYES:
CAPPELLO, MILLER, LO. NOES: PAGE, HUNTER. ABSENT: NONE.
ABSTAIN: NONE.
PAGE/MILLER MOVED TO DIRECT THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO
REVIEW THE BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITS OF MULTI- FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS IN THE C -V AND C -N ZONING DISTRICTS
AND RETURN TO COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDATION TO MAKE
MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITS
CONSISTENT WITH OTHER HEIGHT LIMITS IN THESE ZONING
DISTRICTS. MOTION PASSED. AYES: PAGE, CAPPELLO, MILLER, LO.
NOES: HUNTER. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE.
12. Provide Direction on Appealing the 2014 -2022 Regional Housing Need Allocation
Recommended action:
Authorize the Mayor to sign the appeal request and direct staff to submit it to ABAG.
Community Development Director James Lindsay presented the staff report.
Mayor Hunter invited public comment on the item.
Trish Cypher spoke in favor of submitting the appeal.
Jeff Schwartz spoke in favor of submitting the appeal.
MILLER/PAGE MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE
APPEAL REQUEST AND DIRECT STAFF TO SUBMIT IT TO ABAG.
MOTION PASSED. AYES: PAGE, CAPPELLO, MILLER, LO, HUNTER. NOES:
NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE.
13. FY 2012/13 Mid -Year Budget Status Report and Budget Adjustment Resolution
Recommended action:
Review the FY 2012/13 budget status report and proposed budget adjustments, and
adopt resolution approving the City's FY 2012/13 mid -year operating budget
amendments.
Finance and Administrative Services Director Mary Furey presented the staff report.
Mayor Hunter invited public comment on the item.
No one requested to speak.
RESOLUTION NO. 13 -005
7
K2
MILLER/PAGE MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
CITY'S FY 2012/13 MID -YEAR OPERATING BUDGET AMENDMENTS,
EXCLUDING FUNDING FOR THE CIVIC THEATER MASTER PLAN.
MOTION PASSED. AYES: PAGE, CAPPELLO, MILLER, LO, HUNTER. NOES:
NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE.
RESOLUTION NO. 13 -006
MILLER/PAGE MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
CITY'S FY 2012/13 BUDGET TO INCLUDE $60,000 FOR THE CIVIC
THEATER MASTER PLAN IN THE CAPITAL BUDGET. MOTION PASSED.
AYES: PAGE, CAPPELLO, MILLER, LO. NOES: HUNTER. ABSENT: NONE.
ABSTAIN: NONE.
ADHOC & AGENCY ASSIGNMENT REPORTS
Mayor Jill Hunter
Historical Foundation — the Historical Foundation discussed the Mustard Faire at the last
meeting. The event is scheduled for March 24, 2013.
Village Ad Hoc — the Ad Hoc met and denied an application for a Village Facade
Improvement Program grant, because the building is not visible from Big Basin Way.
West Valley Mayors and Managers Association — during the last meeting, the group
received a presentation by VTA on the Highway 85 express lane project. The group also
received an update on the status of plastic bag bans.
Vice Mayor Emily Lo
Library Joint Powers Authority — during the last meeting, the Board approved a
technology and replacement plan. The project will include a variety of improvements,
including provisions to support an increase in e -books and enhancement of the checkout
system.
Santa Clara Valley Water District Commission — the last meeting was canceled due to
lack of a quorum.
Council Member Howard Miller
Valley Transportation Authority PAC — due to the lack of a quorum, the last meeting was
informational only. During the meeting, the PAC received an update on the budget,
ridership trends, and electrification of CalTrain.
West Valley Solid Waste Management Joint Powers Authority- the next meeting of the
Authority will be February 25, 2013. The Board is expected to receive an update on the
recruitment for an Executive Director and negotiations with the hauler to negotiate a new
contract or renew the existing contract.
LAFCO — Council Member Miller and Council Member Page attended a LAFCO hearing
on the expansion of the City's Urban Service Area. Several staff members also attended
the hearing. The City of Saratoga was well represented.
Council Member Manny Cappello
Chamber of Commerce — the Destination Saratoga committee may be hiring a new public
relations firm in the future. There are currently 14 Destination Saratoga members. The
Chamber is continuing to develop its Youth Academy and will be working with West
Valley College as part of the academy.
N.
29
County HCD Policy Committee — the Committee will be making recommendations on
allocation of CDBG public service funds to the Board of Supervisors at its next meeting.
Santa Clara County Emergency Council — the next meeting is February 7, 2013.
Council Member Chuck Page
TEA Ad Hoc — interviews of 2 lobbyist firms are scheduled for February 7, 2013 in
Sacramento. Representatives from the participating cities will be conducting the
interviews.
West Valley Sanitation District — at the last meeting, the Board discussed rate changes
that may be implemented as a result of the improvements to the San Jose Santa Clara
Water Pollution Control Plant.
LAFCO — Council Member Page attended the LAFCO hearing on the expansion of the
City's Urban Service Area. The LAFCO Board approved the changes to the Urban
Service Area, which will now include the Quarry property.
CITY COUNCIL ITEMS
None
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Dave Anderson shared he would be out of the office until February 13,
2013 and announced that Community Development Director James Lindsay would be
acting City Manager in his absence.
ADJOURNMENT
PAGE /CAPPELLO MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 10:13 P.M.
MOTION PASSED. AYES: PAGE, CAPPELLO, MILLER, LO, HUNTER. NOES:
NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE.
Minutes respectfully submitted:
Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk
I
30
MEETING DATE
DEPARTMENT:
PREPARED BY:
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
February 20, 2013
Finance & Administrative Services
Gina Fitch
SUBJECT: Review of Accounts Payable Check Registers
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Review and accept check registers for the following accounts payable payment cycles:
2/6/2013
2/12/2013
REPORT SUMMARY:
AGENDA ITEM:
CITY MANAGER:
DEPT. DIRECTOR:
Dave Anderson
Mary Furey
Attached are Check Registers for:
Type of Checks
Date
Starting Check #
Ending
Check #
Total Checks
Amount
Checks
Released
Prior Check Register
Date
Ending
Check #
Accounts Payable
2/6/13
122081
122111
31
43,187.17
02/06/13
1/29/13
122080
Accounts Payable
2/12/13
1 122112
122170
59
1 411,589.88
02/12/13
2/6/13
122111
Accounts Payable checks issued for $20,000 or greater:.
Date
Check #
Issued to
Fund
Dept.
Purpose
Amount
02/12/13
122115
Campbell Union HSD
General
PW
Field Rental
20,580.00
02/12/13
122116
Chrisp Company
CIP Streets Project
PW
Quito Road Guardrail
44,972.94
02/12/13
122117
City of Campbell
General
PW
JPA Dues
25,465.50
02/12/13
122120
Cotton Shires & Assoc.
CIP Parks Project
PW
Engineering Services
21,756.79
02/12/13
122121
County of Santa Clara
General
Non - Depart.
SVRIA Assessment
31,838.00
02/12/13
122134
George Bianchi Construction
Greenbriar landscape
PW
Crosswalk
20,681.00
02/12/13
122135
Graham Contractors
CIP Streets Project
PW
Crack Seal
39,500.00
02/12/13
122144
KSAR
General
Non - Depart.
Peg Fees
1 20,201.23
02/12/13
1 122158
lRobert A. Bothman, Inc.
ICIP Grant /CIP Streets
JPW
lRentention Release
1 67,002.04
Accounts Payable checks voided during this time period:
AP Date I Check # Issued to Reason I Status Amount
N/A
31
Cash reductions by fund:
Fund #
Fund Description
02/06/13
02/12/13
Total
111
General Fund
22,216.51
181,898.60
204,115.11
231
Village Lighting
521.83
521.83
232
Azule Lighting
-
233
Sarahills Lighting
-
241
Arroyo de Saratoga Landscape
-
242
Bonnet Way Landscape
-
243
Carnelian Glen
-
244
Cunningham/Glasgow Landscape
-
245
Fredericksburg Landscape
-
246
Greenbriar Landscape
230.00
20,681.00
20,911.00
247
Kerwin Ranch Landscape
-
248
Leutar Court Landscape
-
249
Manor Drive Landscape
130.00
130.00
251
McCartysville Landscape
250.00
250.00
252
Prides Crossing Landscape
-
253
Saratoga Legends Landscape
-
254
Sunland Park Landscape
260.00
260.00
255
Tricia Woods Landscape
-
271
Beauchamps Landscape
-
272
Bellgrove Landscape
1,710.00
1,710.00
273
Gateway Landscape
15.60
15.60
274
Horseshoe Landscape /Lighting
135.00
135.00
275
Quito Lighting
75.00
75.00
276
Tollgate LLD
30.24
30.24
277
Village Commercial Landscape
152.85
152.85
278
Brookglen L &L
50.00
50.00
311
Library GO Bond Debt Service
-
411
CIP Street Projects
1,809.77
137,391.39
139,201.16
412
CIP Park & Trail Projects
24,254.79
24,254.79
413
CIP Facility Projects
400.68
14,142.79
14,543.47
414
CIP Admin Projects
-
421
Tree Fund
-
431
Grant Fund - CIP Streets
10,598.38
25,831.05
36,429.43
432
Grant Fund - Parks & Trails
-
433
Grant Fund - Facilities
-
434
Grant Fund - Admin Projects
-
481
Gas Tax Fund
-
611
Liability /Risk Mgt
1,423.15
1,423.15
612
Workers' Comp
290.40
290.40
621
Office Support
167.62
2,005.94
2,173.56
622
IT Services
852.51
819.05
1,671.56
623
Vehicle & Equipment Maint
1,500.00
267.62
1,767.62
624
Building Maintenance
2,648.85
2,016.43
4,665.28
631
Vehicle & Equipment Replacement
-
632
JIT Equipment Replacement
-
TOTAL
43,187.17
411,589.88
454,777.05
FOLLOW UP ACTION: N/A
ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT:
Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, this item was properly posted as a City Council agenda item and included in the packet made available on
the City's website in advance of the meeting. A copy of the agenda packet is also made available at the Saratoga Branch Library each Monday in
advance of the Council meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
Check Registers in the 'A/P Checks By Period and Year' report format
32
SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 02/07/2013 CITY OF SARATOGA ACCTPA21
TIME: 13:09:59 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date= '20130206 00:00:00.000'
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/13
- - - -- VENDOR - - -- --- - - -
FUND - 009 -
DISBURSEMENT FUND
CASH
ACCT CHECK NO
ISSUE DT
- - - - --
11111
122081
02/06/13
953
11111
122082
02/06/13
641
11111
122082
02/06/13
641
TOTAL
CHECK
CIENEGA
LANDSCAPING
11111
122083
02/06/13
176
11111
122083
02/06/13
176
11111
122083
02/06/13
176
11111
122083
02/06/13
176
11111
122083
02/06/13
176
11111
122083
02/06/13
176
11111
122083
02/06/13
176
11111
122083
02/06/13
176
TOTAL
CHECK
11111
122084
02/06/13
930
11111
122085
02/06/13
235
11111
122086
02/06/13
250
11111
122086
02/06/13
250
11111
122086
02/06/13
250
11111
122086
02/06/13
250
11111
122086
02/06/13
250
11111
122086
02/06/13
250
TOTAL
CHECK
11111
122087
02/06/13
589
11111
122088
02/06/13
741
11111
122089
02/06/13
616
11111
122090
02/06/13
206
11111
122090
02/06/13
206
TOTAL
CHECK
11111
122091
02/06/13
421
11111
122092
02/06/13
500
11111
122093
02/06/13
567
11111
122094
02/06/13
100
11111
122095
02/06/13
221
11111
122095
02/06/13
221
11111
122095
02/06/13
221
11111
122095
02/06/13
221
11111
122095
02/06/13
221
TOTAL
CHECK
- - - -- VENDOR - - -- --- - - -
- -- BUDGET UNIT
----- DESCRIPTION - - - --
ARC
LORAL
2775302
PARKING PLAN COPIES
BKF ENGINEERS
4119122 -001
PROF SVCS 10/22 -11/18
BKF ENGINEERS
4319122 -001
PROF SVCS 10/22 -11/18
CIENEGA
LANDSCAPING
1115301
DEDICATION /K MORAN PK
CIENEGA
LANDSCAPING
1115301
JAN KEVIN MORAN PARK
CIENEGA
LANDSCAPING
1115301
JAN CONGRESS SPRINGS
CIENEGA
LANDSCAPING
1115301
JAN AZULE PARK
CIENEGA
LANDSCAPING
2755302
JAN QUITO LLA
CIENEGA
LANDSCAPING
2785302
JAN BROOKGLEN
CIENEGA
LANDSCAPING
2465302
JAN GREENBRIAR AZULE
CIENEGA
LANDSCAPING
2465302
JANGREENBRIAR SEAGULL
COLE SUPPLY COMPANY, INC 1115301
COMCAST 6223201
COTTON SHIRES AND ASSOCI 111
COTTON SHIRES AND ASSOCI 111
COTTON SHIRES AND ASSOCI 111
COTTON SHIRES AND ASSOCI 111
COTTON SHIRES AND ASSOCI 111
COTTON SHIRES AND ASSOCI 111
CPO LTD 6213102
CPRS 1115301
DAVCO WATERPROOFING SVC, 6246202
DAVID J. POWERS & ASSOC 4119152 -002
DAVID J. POWERS & ASSOC 4319152 -002
EWING IRRIGATION 4139351 -001
JIM SULLIVAN 111
KANEN TOURS 1116101
KSAR 1118301
LORAL
LANDSCAPING,
INC
2515302
LORAL
LANDSCAPING,
INC
2545302
LORAL
LANDSCAPING,
INC
2495302
LORAL
LANDSCAPING,
INC
2725302
LORAL
LANDSCAPING,
INC
2745302
33
BATHROOM SUPPLIES
MTHLY SRVCS 1/26 -2/25
GE012 -0018
GE013 -0001
GE012 -0026
GE010 -0013
GE012 -0019
GE012 -0010
SALES TAX
�191I61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
COPIER LEASE SUPPORT 0.00
DUES RENEWAL -MEEK 0.00
ROOF REPAIRS 0.00
QUITO RD BRIDGES PROJE 0.00
QUITO RD BRIDGES PROJE 0.00
WIRE
REFUND FACILITY
2/8/13 EXCURSION
3 BROADCASTS 1/13
JAN MCCARTYSVILLE
JAN SUNLAND PARK
JAN MANOR DR
JAN BELLGROVE
JAN HORSESHOE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
lowlie,
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
AMOUNT
152.85
903.42
6,972.98
7,876.40
232.00
275.00
400.00
395.00
75.00
50.00
135.00
95.00
1,657.00
686.24
112.55
976.25
1, 650.65
1,775.00
742.50
1,113.75
1,996.25
8,254.40
105.81
170.00
447.50
906.35
3,625.40
4,531.75
400.68
300.00
3,596.40
1, 950.00
250.00
260.00
130.00
1,710.00
135.00
2,485.00
SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR PAGE NUMBER:
DATE: 02/07/2013 CITY OF SARATOGA ACCTPA21
TIME: 13:09:59 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date= '20130206 00:00:00.000'
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/13
34
2
FUND - 009 -
DISBURSEMENT FUND
CASH
ACCT CHECK NO
ISSUE DT
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR - - -- --- - - - - --
BUDGET UNIT
- - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - --
SALES TAX
AMOUNT
11111
122096
02/06/13
996
MEGAPATH
6223201
ISP ANNUAL SERVICES
0.00
739.96
11111
122097
02/06/13
499
CARPENTERS LOCAL 2236 (M
111
DED:3000 DUES
0.00
330.00
11111
122098
02/06/13
131
NORMAN PAUL PRINT CTR
1116101
2013 SUMMER REC GUIDE
0.00
1,356.17
11111
122099
02/06/13
135
NORTH BAY BLDG MAINTENAN
6246202
JANITORIAL SERVICES
0.00
437.00
11111
122100
02/06/13
1
OFF OF SHERIFF - FISCAL SV
1113301
FINGERPRINT FEES DEC
0.00
100.00
11111
122101
02/06/13
156
OKIN,YELENA
1116101
INSTRUCTOR- BEADING
0.00
29.00
11111
122102
02/06/13
60
ONTRAC
1114101
DELIVERY CHARGES
0.00
5.88
11111
122103
02/06/13
908
PRO DOOR & GLASS
6246202
BUILDING REPAIRS
0.00
1,764.35
11111
122104
02/06/13
729
SARATOGA SCHOOL OF DANCE
1116101
INSTRUCTOR -DANCE
0.00
222.53
11111
122104
02/06/13
729
SARATOGA SCHOOL OF DANCE
1116101
INSTRUCTOR -DANCE
0.00
267.03
TOTAL
CHECK
0.00
489.56
11111
122105
02/06/13
1077
SUNNYVALE BUILDING MAINT
1115301
JAN WKND PRK RESTROOM
0.00
715.00
11111
122106
02/06/13
1071
UNITED STATES TREASURY
111
DED:2013 IRS LEVY
0.00
416.82
11111
122107
02/06/13
432
WEST VALLEY COLLECTIONS
1115301
BINS CONGRESS SPRINGS
0.00
320.12
11111
122108
02/06/13
613
WEST VALLEY SANITATION D
1115103
NPS SVC 10/1- 12/31/12
0.00
739.20
11111
122108
02/06/13
613
WEST VALLEY SANITATION D
1115103
NPS ADD CHG 7/12 -9/12
0.00
938.32
TOTAL
CHECK
0.00
1,677.52
11111
122109
02/06/13
544
WHEEL WORKS
6235202
MAINTENANCE VEH #113
0.00
300.00
11111
122109
02/06/13
544
WHEEL WORKS
6235202
MAINTENANCE VEH #111
0.00
599.99
11111
122109
02/06/13
544
WHEEL WORKS
6235202
MAINTENANCE VEH #05
0.00
600.01
TOTAL
CHECK
0.00
1,500.00
11111
122110
02/06/13
445
WONG, ELLEN
1116101
INSTRUCTOR - MANDRIN
0.00
517.40
11111
122111
02/06/13
439
XEROX CORPORATION
6213102
SIN: RYU272971 MAINTEN
0.00
61.81
TOTAL
CASH ACCOUNT
0.00
43,187.17
TOTAL
FUND
0.00
43,187.17
TOTAL
REPORT
0.00
43,187.17
34
2
SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 02/12/2013 CITY OF SARATOGA ACCTPA21
TIME: 11:30:53 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date= '20130212 00:00:00.000'
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/13
- - - -- VENDOR - - -- --- - - - - -- BUDGET UNIT ----- DESCRIPTION - --
ACCENT GRAPHICS 1111201 NAME PLATES P &R COM
ACCENT GRAPHICS 1111201 NAME PLATES LIB COM
BAY TELECOM 6223201 IT SERVICES
BORTZ, SHERI L 1116101 INSTRUCTOR -YOGA
BORTZ, SHERI L 1116101 INSTRUCTOR -YOGA
BORTZ, SHERI L 1116101 INSTRUCTOR -YOGA
CAMPBELL UNION HIGH SCHO 1115301
CHRISP COMPANY 4119111 -002
CHRISP COMPANY 4119111 -001
CITY OF CAMPBELL 1115103
CITY OF SAN JOSE 1117101
CONTRACT SWEEPING SERVIC 1115103
COTTON SHIRES AND ASSOCI 4129222 -002
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA -FI 1117102
CSG CONSULTANTS INC. 1114201
CZ FAMILY TRUST 111
CZ FAMILY TRUST 111
DE LAGE LANDEN PUBLIC FI 6213102
DEEP CLIFF GOLF COURSE 1116101
DEEP CLIFF GOLF COURSE 1116101
DEEP CLIFF GOLF COURSE 1116101
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 1117101
DEVANAGONDI HARISH & DEE 111
DHIREN UNADKAT 111
EL OBSERVADOR PUBL INC 1112201
ERGOVERA 6128501
EVENT SERVICES 1115301
35
FIELD RNTL FALL 2012
2012 SARATOGA AVE & QU
QUITO RD GUARD RAIL
JPA DUES 10/12 -6/13
ANIMAL SERVICES FEB
STREET SWEEPING SERVIC
GEOTECH REVIEW & ENGIN
FY12 /13 SVRIA FEE
ASSIST WITH BLDG SRVS
ARB08 -0088
GEO08 -0021
COPIER LEASES
INSTRUCTOR -GOLF
INSTRUCTOR -GOLF
INSTRUCTOR -GOLF
JAN 2013 PARKING CIT
ARB12 -0024
REFUND FACILITY
LEGAL NOTICE
ERGO EVAL 1/10/13
PROSPECT PORTA POTTY
SALES TAX
FUND - 009 -
DISBURSEMENT FUND
CASH
ACCT CHECK NO
ISSUE DT
- - - - --
11111
122112
02/12/13
35
11111
122112
02/12/13
35
TOTAL
CHECK
843.75
0.00
11111
122113
02/12/13
314
11111
122114
02/12/13
369
11111
122114
02/12/13
369
11111
122114
02/12/13
369
TOTAL
CHECK
2,720.00
0.00
11111
122115
02/12/13
99
11111
122116
02/12/13
935
11111
122116
02/12/13
935
TOTAL
CHECK
1,018.68
0.00
11111
122117
02/12/13
188
11111
122118
02/12/13
517
11111
122119
02/12/13
1023
11111
122120
02/12/13
250
11111
122121
02/12/13
1
11111
122122
02/12/13
1060
11111
122123
02/12/13
500
11111
122123
02/12/13
500
TOTAL
CHECK
11111
122124
02/12/13
564
11111
122125
02/12/13
211
11111
122125
02/12/13
211
11111
122125
02/12/13
211
TOTAL
CHECK
11111
122126
02/12/13
1
11111
122127
02/12/13
500
11111
122128
02/12/13
500
11111
122129
02/12/13
1128
11111
122130
02/12/13
415
11111
122131
02/12/13
419
- - - -- VENDOR - - -- --- - - - - -- BUDGET UNIT ----- DESCRIPTION - --
ACCENT GRAPHICS 1111201 NAME PLATES P &R COM
ACCENT GRAPHICS 1111201 NAME PLATES LIB COM
BAY TELECOM 6223201 IT SERVICES
BORTZ, SHERI L 1116101 INSTRUCTOR -YOGA
BORTZ, SHERI L 1116101 INSTRUCTOR -YOGA
BORTZ, SHERI L 1116101 INSTRUCTOR -YOGA
CAMPBELL UNION HIGH SCHO 1115301
CHRISP COMPANY 4119111 -002
CHRISP COMPANY 4119111 -001
CITY OF CAMPBELL 1115103
CITY OF SAN JOSE 1117101
CONTRACT SWEEPING SERVIC 1115103
COTTON SHIRES AND ASSOCI 4129222 -002
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA -FI 1117102
CSG CONSULTANTS INC. 1114201
CZ FAMILY TRUST 111
CZ FAMILY TRUST 111
DE LAGE LANDEN PUBLIC FI 6213102
DEEP CLIFF GOLF COURSE 1116101
DEEP CLIFF GOLF COURSE 1116101
DEEP CLIFF GOLF COURSE 1116101
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 1117101
DEVANAGONDI HARISH & DEE 111
DHIREN UNADKAT 111
EL OBSERVADOR PUBL INC 1112201
ERGOVERA 6128501
EVENT SERVICES 1115301
35
FIELD RNTL FALL 2012
2012 SARATOGA AVE & QU
QUITO RD GUARD RAIL
JPA DUES 10/12 -6/13
ANIMAL SERVICES FEB
STREET SWEEPING SERVIC
GEOTECH REVIEW & ENGIN
FY12 /13 SVRIA FEE
ASSIST WITH BLDG SRVS
ARB08 -0088
GEO08 -0021
COPIER LEASES
INSTRUCTOR -GOLF
INSTRUCTOR -GOLF
INSTRUCTOR -GOLF
JAN 2013 PARKING CIT
ARB12 -0024
REFUND FACILITY
LEGAL NOTICE
ERGO EVAL 1/10/13
PROSPECT PORTA POTTY
SALES TAX
AMOUNT
0.00
227.89
0.00
121.99
0.00
349.88
0.00
209.11
0.00
202.50
0.00
168.75
0.00
472.50
0.00
843.75
0.00
20,580.00
0.00
40,867.94
0.00
4,105.00
0.00
44,972.94
0.00
25,465.50
0.00
14,719.31
0.00
13,239.50
0.00
21,756.79
0.00
31,838.00
0.00
2,720.00
0.00
1,990.00
0.00
118.43
0.00
2,108.43
0.00
1,413.00
0.00
324.48
0.00
477.36
0.00
216.84
0.00
1,018.68
0.00
125.00
0.00
2,050.00
0.00
300.00
0.00
370.00
0.00
290.40
0.00
303.45
SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR PAGE NUMBER: 2
DATE: 02/12/2013 CITY OF SARATOGA ACCTPA21
TIME: 11:30:53 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date= '20130212 00:00:00.000'
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/13
FUND - 009 - DISBURSEMENT FUND
CASH
ACCT CHECK NO
ISSUE DT
- - - - --
11111
122132
02/12/13
421
11111
122133
02/12/13
423
11111
122134
02/12/13
458
11111
122134
02/12/13
458
TOTAL
CHECK
KEN
FUSON
11111
122135
02/12/13
462
11111
122136
02/12/13
463
11111
122137
02/12/13
14
11111
122137
02/12/13
14
11111
122137
02/12/13
14
TOTAL
CHECK
FOOTHILL PARK -MOLES
11111
122138
02/12/13
1053
11111
122139
02/12/13
61
11111
122140
02/12/13
63
11111
122140
02/12/13
63
TOTAL
CHECK
11111
122141
02/12/13
1078
11111
122142
02/12/13
567
11111
122142
02/12/13
567
TOTAL
CHECK
11111
122143
02/12/13
132
11111
122143
02/12/13
132
11111
122143
02/12/13
132
11111
122143
02/12/13
132
11111
122143
02/12/13
132
11111
122143
02/12/13
132
11111
122143
02/12/13
132
TOTAL
CHECK
11111
122144
02/12/13
100
11111
122144
02/12/13
100
TOTAL
CHECK
11111
122145
02/12/13
665
11111
122146
02/12/13
283
11111
122147
02/12/13
500
11111
122148
02/12/13
831
- - - -- VENDOR - - -- --- - - - - -- BUDGET UNIT
EWING IRRIGATION 1115301
FEHR & PEERS 4119111 -001
GEORGE BIANCHI CONSTRUCT 2465302
GEORGE BIANCHI CONSTRUCT 2465302
GRAHAM CONTRACTORS, INC 4119111 -001
GRAINGER 6246202
HYDROTEC IRRIGATION EQUI 1115301
HYDROTEC IRRIGATION EQUI 1115301
HYDROTEC IRRIGATION EQUI 4139351 -001
INFORMATION STATION SPEC 1118101
INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTE 6235202
INTERSTATE TRAFFIC CONTR 4119111 -002
INTERSTATE TRAFFIC CONTR 4119111 -002
----- DESCRIPTION - - - - --
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEERI
COX AVENUE CROSSWALK I
COX AVENUE CROSSWALK I
2012 CRACK SEAL
FACILITIES SUPPLIES
GARDNER PARK VALVE
FOOTHILL REPLACE COIL
SARATOGA PROSPECT CTR
AUDIO SRVCS- BALANCE
EQUIPMENT PARTS
STREETS SUPPLIES
STREETS SUPPLIES
JUST
LEAKS, INC.
6246202
ROOF REPAIRS
KANEN
TOURS
1116101
EXCURSION 1/23/13
KANEN
TOURS
1116101
EXCURSION 2/8/13
KEN
FUSON
PEST MANAGEMEN
1115301
KEVIN MORAN PRK -MOLES
KEN
FUSON
PEST MANAGEMEN
1115301
CONGRESS PRK - GOPHER
KEN
FUSON
PEST MANAGEMEN
1115301
CIVIC CTR /LIB - GOPHER
KEN
FUSON
PEST MANAGEMEN
1115301
WILDWOOD PARK -MOLES
KEN
FUSON
PEST MANAGEMEN
1115301
RAVENSWOOD PRK - GOPHER
KEN
FUSON
PEST MANAGEMEN
1115301
BLANEY PLAZA - GOPHER
KEN
FUSON
PEST MANAGEMEN
1115301
FOOTHILL PARK -MOLES
KSAR 111
KSAR 111
MARK THOMAS & COMPANY 4119121 -001
MARTIN, JIM 111
MIKE LIU 111
MUSSON THEATRICAL, INC 4139322 -001
36
COMCAST FEE THRU12 /12
PEG FEES THRU 12/31
COX AVENUE PEDESTRIAN
REIMB DEC THRU FEB
REFUND FACILITY
THEATER EQUIPMENT
SALES TAX AMOUNT
0.00 28.34
0.00 4,514.86
0.00
1,500.00
0.00
19,181.00
0.00
20,681.00
0.00
39,500.00
0.00
92.05
0.00
71.00
0.00
94.46
0.00
13,063.67
0.00
13,229.13
0.00
123.72
0.00
112.92
0.00
57.11
0.00
245.14
0.00
302.25
0.00 580.56
0.00 89.10
0.00 486.00
0.00 575.10
0.00
330.00
0.00
30.00
0.00
1,105.00
0.00
150.00
0.00
30.00
0.00
30.00
0.00
30.00
0.00
1,705.00
0.00
15,864.14
0.00
4,337.09
0.00
20,201.23
0.00 1,443.00
0.00
600.00
0.00
300.00
0.00
89.12
SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR PAGE NUMBER: 3
DATE: 02/12/2013 CITY OF SARATOGA ACCTPA21
TIME: 11:30:53 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date= '20130212 00:00:00.000'
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/13
FUND - 009 - DISBURSEMENT FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT - --
11111 122149 02/12/13 135
11111
122150
02/12/13
145
11111
122150
02/12/13
145
TOTAL
CHECK
0.00
42.52
11111
122151
02/12/13
540
11111
122152
02/12/13
168
11111
122153
02/12/13
173
11111
122153
02/12/13
173
11111
122153
02/12/13
173
11111
122153
02/12/13
173
11111
122153
02/12/13
173
TOTAL
CHECK
0.00
112.00
11111
122154
02/12/13
1092
11111
122154
02/12/13
1092
11111
122154
02/12/13
1092
11111
122154
02/12/13
1092
11111
122154
02/12/13
1092
11111
122154
02/12/13
1092
11111
122154
02/12/13
1092
TOTAL
CHECK
0.00
990.00
11111
122155
02/12/13
278
11111
122156
02/12/13
296
11111
122156
02/12/13
296
TOTAL
CHECK
11111
122157
02/12/13
500
11111
122158
02/12/13
877
11111
122158
02/12/13
877
TOTAL
CHECK
11111
122159
02/12/13
55
11111
122160
02/12/13
87
11111
122160
02/12/13
87
11111
122160
02/12/13
87
11111
122160
02/12/13
87
TOTAL
CHECK
11111
122161
02/12/13
154
11111
122161
02/12/13
154
11111
122161
02/12/13
154
11111
122161
02/12/13
154
11111
122161
02/12/13
154
11111
122161
02/12/13
154
- - - -- VENDOR - - -- --- - - - - -- BUDGET UNIT
NORTH BAY BLDG MAINTENAN 6246202
OFFICE DEPOT INC. 1113301
OFFICE DEPOT INC. 1113301
ORCHARD SUPPLY 6246202
ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE- 4119111 -001
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 6246202
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1115301
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 2315302
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 2735302
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1115301
PALACE ART & OFFICE SUPP 1114101
PALACE ART & OFFICE SUPP 1114201
PALACE ART & OFFICE SUPP 6213102
PALACE ART & OFFICE SUPP 1114101
PALACE ART & OFFICE SUPP 1114201
PALACE ART & OFFICE SUPP 1114201
PALACE ART & OFFICE SUPP 1114101
----- DESCRIPTION - --
JANITORIAL SERVICES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
FACILITIES SUPPLIES
STREETS SUPPLIES
NATURAL GAS VEHICLE
PARKS /OPEN SPACE
VILLAGE LIGHTING
GATEWAY SERVICE
PUBLIC LIB /LANDSCAPE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
RETURN PRODUCT
RETURN PRODUCT
PETROTEK 6235202 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS
PLANET GRANITE 1116101 INSTRUCTOR -ROCK CLIMB
PLANET GRANITE 1116101 INSTRUCTOR -ROCK CLIMB
RAJ DURGA 111 ARB12 -0053
ROBERT A BOTHMAN, INC 431 RETENTION REL P023/40
ROBERT A BOTHMAN, INC 411 RETENTION REL P023/40
ROSS RECREATION EQUIPMEN 1115301
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 6246202
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1115301
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 2765302
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1115301
SHUTE MIHALY & WEINBERGE 1118201
SHUTE MIHALY & WEINBERGE 1118201
SHUTE MIHALY & WEINBERGE 1118201
SHUTE MIHALY & WEINBERGE 1118201
SHUTE MIHALY & WEINBERGE 1118201
SHUTE MIHALY & WEINBERGE 1118201
37
PROSPECT CTR DEDICATE
BUILDINGS
PARKS /OPEN SPACE
TOLLGATE
MEDIANS /PARKWAYS
CTY ATTN COM DEV
CTY ATTN COUNCIL MTGS
CTY ATTN PUBLIC WORKS
CTY ATTN CITY CLERK
CTY ATTN CITY MANAGER
CTY ATTN HUMAN RES
SALES TAX AMOUNT
0.00 209.00
0.00
37.02
0.00
19.99
0.00
57.01
0.00
166.84
0.00
9.15
0.00
42.52
0.00
9.85
0.00
521.83
0.00
15.60
0.00
19.71
0.00
609.51
0.00
149.94
0.00
48.17
0.00
592.94
0.00
74.68
0.00
50.67
0.00
-7.30
0.00
-1.46
0.00
907.64
0.00
154.70
0.00
224.00
0.00
112.00
0.00
336.00
0.00
228.95
0.00
25,412.85
0.00
41,589.19
0.00
67,002.04
0.00
1,217.22
0.00
382.10
0.00
1,367.12
0.00
30.24
0.00
707.69
0.00
2,487.15
0.00
1,346.40
0.00
1,762.20
0.00
217.80
0.00
772.20
0.00
990.00
0.00
59.40
SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR PAGE NUMBER: 4
DATE: 02/12/2013 CITY OF SARATOGA ACCTPA21
TIME: 11:30:53 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date= '20130212 00:00:00.000'
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/13
FUND
- 009 -
DISBURSEMENT FUND
CASH ACCT
CHECK NO
ISSUE DT
--------
- - - -
-- VENDOR - - -- ---
- - - - --
BUDGET UNIT
- - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - --
SALES TAX
AMOUNT
11111
122161
02/12/13
154
SHUTE
MIHALY & WEINBERGE
1118201
CTY ATTN REIMB EXP
0.00
30.17
11111
122161
02/12/13
154
SHUTE
MIHALY & WEINBERGE
1118201
CTY ATTN REC /RSK MGMT
0.00
970.20
11111
122161
02/12/13
154
SHUTE
MIHALY & WEINBERGE
1118201
CTY ATTN REV CONTRACT
0.00
198.00
11111
122161
02/12/13
154
SHUTE
MIHALY & WEINBERGE
1118201
DEFEND CITY
0.00
6,082.80
11111
122161
02/12/13
154
SHUTE
MIHALY & WEINBERGE
4319152 -002
QUITO ROAD BRIDGES
0.00
418.20
11111
122161
02/12/13
154
SHUTE
MIHALY & WEINBERGE
111
REIMB WORK
0.00
2,251.60
TOTAL CHECK
0.00
15,098.97
11111
122162
02/12/13
236
SOLECTRIC
ELECTRICAL
1115301
QUITO PRK BATHROOM
0.00
316.80
11111
122163
02/12/13
253
STEVE
BENZING ARCHITECT
4139323 -002
DESIGN WHH STORAGE BUI
0.00
990.00
11111
122164
02/12/13
336
TLC
ADMINISTRATORS
1113301
125 ADMIN FEES 2/13
0.00
175.00
11111
122165
02/12/13
343
TMT
ENTERPRISES INC
1115301
CANDLESTICK PRK CLAY
0.00
4,063.72
11111
122166
02/12/13
726
TREES
360 DEGREES
1115301
BLDG LANDSCAPE
0.00
800.00
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1111201
TRAFFIC SAFETY MTG
0.00
16.97
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1115201
MSA WORKSHOP
0.00
40.00
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1116101
ADVERTISING
0.00
85.00
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
6246202
FACILITIES SUPPLIES
0.00
44.82
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
6246202
FACILITIES SUPPLIES
0.00
67.14
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
6246202
FACILITIES SUPPLIES
0.00
5.83
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
6246202
FACILITIES SUPPLIES
0.00
206.14
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
6246202
FACILITIES SUPPLIES
0.00
199.92
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1113101
GFOA CAFR AWARD FROG
0.00
435.00
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1113101
CSMFO TRAINING
0.00
150.00
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1113101
PARKING FEE
0.00
5.00
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
6246202
FACILITIES SUPPLIES
0.00
19.51
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
6223201
CONFERENCE TRANSP
0.00
10.00
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1115201
CELL DOCK - STREETS
0.00
54.57
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
6223201
ON -LINE BACK UP JAN
0.00
119.45
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
6223201
LASERFICHE CONE LODG
0.00
480.49
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1115201
CAR CHARGER - STREETS
0.00
2.82
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1115201
CELL DOCK (5) STREETS
0.00
249.75
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1115301
CELL DOCK (6) PARKS
0.00
304.19
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1115201
POSTAGE
0.00
2.10
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1116101
PLUG & PAY
0.00
15.00
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1116101
PLUG & PAY
0.00
15.00
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
6118401
CPCU ARM 56 EXAM FEE
0.00
250.00
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1112101
CONFERENCE TRAVEL
0.00
42.40
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1112101
CONFERENCE LODGING
0.00
483.53
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1112101
OFFICE SUPPLIES
0.00
37.01
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1117102
EMERG OFC SUPPLIES
0.00
1,772.75
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1111101
COUNCIL MEETING
0.00
33.78
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1111101
COUNCIL MEETING
0.00
221.79
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1118101
READERSHIP
0.00
57.50
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1116101
SNACKS - WINTER CAMP
0.00
66.18
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1116101
CRAFTS - WINTER CAMP
0.00
29.91
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1116101
BEADS - WINTER CAMP
0.00
23.37
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US
BANK
PURCHASING
CARD
1116101
PRIZES - WINTER CAMP
0.00
23.97
38
SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR
DATE: 02/12/2013 CITY OF SARATOGA
TIME: 11:30:53 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.ck_date= '20130212 00:00:00.000'
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/13
PAGE NUMBER: 5
ACCTPA21
39
FUND - 009 -
DISBURSEMENT FUND
CASH
ACCT CHECK NO
ISSUE DT
--------
- - - - -- VENDOR - - --
--- - - - - --
BUDGET
UNIT
- - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - --
SALES TAX
AMOUNT
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US BANK PURCHASING CARD
6118401
CPSI COURSE
0.00
1,173.15
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US BANK PURCHASING CARD
1115301
PARKS SUPPLIES
0.00
635.00
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US BANK PURCHASING CARD
1114201
PUBLIC STORAGE
0.00
89.00
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US BANK PURCHASING CARD
1111201
PC STUDY SESSION
0.00
124.58
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US BANK PURCHASING CARD
1114101
NOTARY ASSOC FEE
0.00
52.00
11111
122168
02/12/13
391
US BANK PURCHASING CARD
1114101
APA MEMBER - MCCORMICK
0.00
510.00
TOTAL
CHECK
0.00
8,154.62
11111
122169
02/12/13
402
VISTA LANDSCAPE
& MAINTE
1115301
PLANTING CIVIC CENTER
0.00
362.66
11111
122169
02/12/13
402
VISTA LANDSCAPE
& MAINTE
1115301
REMOVE DIRT - SIDEWALK
0.00
980.00
11111
122169
02/12/13
402
VISTA LANDSCAPE
& MAINTE
4119111
-001
STREET CLEAN UP QUITO
0.00
2,280.00
11111
122169
02/12/13
402
VISTA LANDSCAPE
& MAINTE
4119111
-001
SHOULDER CLEAN UP COX
0.00
1,750.00
11111
122169
02/12/13
402
VISTA LANDSCAPE
& MAINTE
4119111
-001
SHOULDER REPAIR QUITO
0.00
1,030.00
11111
122169
02/12/13
402
VISTA LANDSCAPE
& MAINTE
1115301
PLANTING CIVIC CENTER
0.00
550.25
11111
122169
02/12/13
402
VISTA LANDSCAPE
& MAINTE
1115301
SPRAY ORCHARD TRAIL
0.00
855.00
11111
122169
02/12/13
402
VISTA LANDSCAPE
& MAINTE
1115301
WOOD CHIPS ORCHARD TR
0.00
1,395.00
11111
122169
02/12/13
402
VISTA LANDSCAPE
& MAINTE
1115301
PLANTING BONNET WAY
0.00
405.00
11111
122169
02/12/13
402
VISTA LANDSCAPE
& MAINTE
1115301
QUITO PARK HORSESHOE
0.00
254.50
11111
122169
02/12/13
402
VISTA LANDSCAPE
& MAINTE
1115301
INSTALL D.G.CIVIC CTR
0.00
2,420.00
11111
122169
02/12/13
402
VISTA LANDSCAPE
& MAINTE
4129211
-001
STEPS AT LIBRARY
0.00
2,498.00
11111
122169
02/12/13
402
VISTA LANDSCAPE
& MAINTE
1115301
BENDER BRD GARDINIER
0.00
490.37
11111
122169
02/12/13
402
VISTA LANDSCAPE
& MAINTE
1115301
TRAIL GRADING ORCHARD
0.00
1,080.00
11111
122169
02/12/13
402
VISTA LANDSCAPE
& MAINTE
1115301
ANNUALS CIVIC CENTER
0.00
630.00
TOTAL
CHECK
0.00
16,980.78
11111
122170
02/12/13
432
WEST VALLEY COLLECTIONS
1115301
GARBAGE BINS
0.00
2,872.76
TOTAL
CASH ACCOUNT
0.00
411,589.88
TOTAL
FUND
0.00
411,589.88
TOTAL
REPORT
0.00
411,589.88
39
u �
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
RL ?FVx1�`�
MEETING DATE: February 20, 2013 AGENDA ITEM:
DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office CITY MANAGER: Dave Anderson
PREPARED BY: Crystal Bothelio DIRECTOR: Dave Anderson
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Adoption of City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update and Negative
Declaration
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:
- Open the public hearing and accept public testimony on the General Plan Amendment
and Negative Declaration;
- Close the hearing and deliberate; and
- Approve resolution (Attachment A) certifying the Negative Declaration and adopting the
revised Safety Element of the City's General Plan.
BACKGROUND:
In 2011, the City of Saratoga applied for and received a $175,000 Disaster Recovery Initiative
grant from the State of California Community Development Block Grant Program to update the
Safety Element of the City's General Plan. The City's current Safety Element was adopted in
1987 and minor revisions have been made since then.
In May 2012, the City hired RBF Consulting to prepare the Safety Element update. RBF has
been working with a team of City staff, as well as staff from Santa Clara County Fire Department
and the Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office, to prepare the update. The goals of the project are
to update existing maps and prepare new maps relevant to the Safety Element, incorporate
references to relevant maps in the text of the Safety Element, add the City's local hazard
mitigation plan as an annex to the Safety Element, bring the Safety Element into compliance
with current law, and update the Safety Element to reflect current conditions in the Saratoga.
Summary of Proposed Changes:
The proposed revisions to the Safety Element range from minor grammatical edits, changes
reflecting new and /or changes in existing regulatory requirements, new processes in place since
the previous element was prepared and adopted, and development of new exhibits to reflect
current practices and conditions in the City of Saratoga. Updated exhibits include:
1. Geologic Map
2. Landslide Areas
Page 1 of 3
W
3. Fault Location Map and Earthquake Fault Zones
4. Liquefaction Areas
5. Dam Failure Inundation Areas
6. FEMA Flood Zones
7. Fire Hazard Zones
8. Evacuation Routes
In addition to the above exhibits, Cotton, Shires, and Associates, Inc. prepared an updated and
comprehensive ground movement potential map of the City. This map is Attachment C to the
staff report and will be included as an exhibit in the Safety Element.
There are no significant changes to City policies and the updates would not materially affect the
physical environment, nor result in any new environmental impacts not already contemplated as
part of the previous environmental reviews for the City's General Plan.
Environmental Determination:
The project has been the subject of an Initial Study (IS) under the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA). The IS indicates there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole
record before the City of Saratoga, that the project may have a significant effect on the
environment. For this reason, the Planning Commission has recommended the City Council
adopt a Negative Declaration for the project. The Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative
Declaration was circulated for public review. The IS and Negative Declaration were available for
review beginning December 19, 2012 and the public comment period closed on January 18,
2013. No comments were submitted.
Planning Commission Review:
At a Planning Commission Study Session held on January 8, 2013, the Planning Commission
recommended several changes to the draft Safety Element. These changes are identified in
Attachment E and have been incorporated into the Safety Element, included as Attachment B,
except to the extent modified by changes following the City Council study session.
As required by State law, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Safety
Element update on January 23, 2013. The Planning Commission recommended that the Council
adopt the Safety Element update.
City Council Study Session:
A City Council study session on the revised Safety Element was held on February 4, 2013.
During the study session, the revised Safety Element was presented to the Council and feedback
on the proposed changes was given to staff. Changes to the draft Safety Element are noted in
Attachment E and have been incorporated into the Safety Element, included as Attachment B.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
N/A
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING THE RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
Page 2 of 3
41
The revised Safety Element of the City of Saratoga General Plan will not be adopted.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S):
The Council may choose to continue this item and direct staff to revise the Safety Element or
deny approval of the Safety Element, leaving the existing Safety Element in the City's General
Plan.
FOLLOW UP ACTION(S):
The new Safety Element will be posted on the City website and the Community Development
Department will update printed copies of the General Plan to include the new Safety Element.
ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT:
Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, this item was properly posted as a City Council agenda
item and was included in the packet made available on the City's web site in advance of the
meeting. A copy of the agenda packet is also made available at the Saratoga Branch Library each
Monday in advance of the Council meeting. Additionally, a legal advertisement publicizing this
public hearing was printed in the San Jose Mercury News on February 8, 2013.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: Resolution Adopting a Negative Declaration and Revised Safety Element
Attachment B: Revised Safety Element
Attachment C: Revised Safety Element Appendix C — Ground Movement Potential Map
Attachment D: Summary of Policy Changes
Attachment E: Summary of Changes to the Draft Safety Element
Attachment F: Planning Commission Resolution Recommending Adoption of Initial
Study/Negative Declaration and Safety Element Update
Page 3 of 3
:,
RESOLUTION 13-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA
APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
ADOPTING AN UPDATED SAFETY ELEMENT OF THE
CITY OF SARATOGA GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the Safety Element is a mandatory element of the General Plan required by
Senate Bill 351, an act which became law on February 23, 1971 and has been amended from
time to time; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the General Plan Safety Element is to identify natural or
human activity- related hazards, define measures to address them, and reduce the impact of
hazards through advance planning and preparation; and
WHEREAS, the Safety Element addresses the protection of the community from any
unreasonable risks associated with the effects of seismically induced surface rupture, ground
shaking, found failure, tsunami, seiche, and dam failure; slope instability leading to mudslides
and landslides; subsidence; liquefaction; and other seismic hazards, and other geologic hazards
known to the City Council; flooding; wildland and urban fires, evacuation routes, peakload water
supply requirements, and minimum road widths and clearances around structures, as those items
relate to identified fire and geologic hazards, incidents that call for emergency protection; and
WHEREAS, the current City of Saratoga Safety Element was adopted in 1987 with
minor revisions that have been adopted since then; and
WHEREAS, the City has prepared a comprehensive update to the Safety Element; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Negative Declaration were prepared for the Safety
Element update, pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, Public
Resources Code § §21000- 21178, Title 14, Chapter 3 California Code of Regulations §15000-
15387, Section 15070 (CEQA State Guidelines); and
WHEREAS, the Initial Study and a notice of intent to adopt a Negative Declaration were
duly noticed and circulated for a 20 -day public review period beginning December 19, 2012,
during which no comments were received; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the Initial Study and Negative
Declaration represent the City's independent judgment and analysis; and
WHEREAS, on January 23, 2012 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed
public hearing on the draft Safety Element and Negative Declaration, at which time all interested
parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence and argument; and
43
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the draft Safety Element, CEQA
documentation, correspondence, presentations from the public, and all testimony and other
evidence presented at the public hearing, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Negative Declaration and
proposed update to the Safety Element and recommended that the City Council approve the
Negative Declaration and adopt the updated Safety Element of the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Saratoga City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the
approval of the Negative Declaration and adoption of the updated Safety Element on February
20, 2013, at which time all interested parties were given the opportunity to be heard and to
present evidence and argument; and
WHEREAS, the City Council was presented with and/or had the opportunity to review
all of the information in the administrative record; and
WHEREAS, after the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council considered all
oral and written comments and a staff recommendation for approval of the Negative Declaration
and adoption of the Safety Element update; reviewed and considered the information in the
Initial Study and Negative Declaration, public and agency comments on the Initial Study and
Negative Declaration and Safety Element update, the administrative record, and the staff report
for completeness and compliance with CEQA, CEQA Guidelines, and any and all other
applicable requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that documents constituting the
record of proceedings upon which this decision is based are located in the City of Saratoga
Community Development Department and are maintained by the Community Development
Director; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA and CEQA guidelines, the City Council finds on the
basis of, and after review of, the whole record before it (including the Initial Study, the Negative
Declaration, any and all comments received, and in light of expert and other evidence
submitted), that there is no credible, substantial evidenced that the Safety Element update may
have a significant on the environment as to any issue raised; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Saratoga finds that the Safety Element is
consistent with the remaining portions of the City of Saratoga General Plan;
..
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Saratoga does hereby approve the
Negative Declaration for the Safety Element update (attached as Exhibit A) and adopts the
Safety Element (attached as Exhibit B).
Attachments:
Exhibit A — Negative Declaration
Exhibit B — Updated Safety Element of the City of Saratoga General Plan
The above and foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Saratoga
City Council held on the 20th day of February 2013 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
DATE:
Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk
45
Jill Hunter, Mayor
Environmental Initial Study
and Negative Declaration
For:
City of Saratoga General Plan
Safety Element Update
Public Review Period:
December 19, 2012 to January 18, 2013
.,
Page 2
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
This page was intentionally left blank
47
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
1. Project title: General Plan Safety Element Update
2. Lead agency name and address: City of Saratoga; Planning Division
13777 Fruitvale Avenue; Saratoga, CA 95070
3. Contact person and phone number: Cynthia McCormick AICP, Planner
(408) 868 -1230
4. Project location: City of Saratoga
5. Project sponsor name and address: City of Saratoga; Planning Division
6. General plan designation: Not applicable.
7. Zoning: Not applicable.
8. Description of Project: The Safety Element is a mandatory element of the General Plan required by
SB 351, an act which became law on February 23, 1971. Originally addressed in two separate
elements of the General Plan, the Safety Element and Seismic Safety Element were combined into
one element, the Safety Element, under California Government Code Article 5 -65302 (1986). This
update is intended to supersede the existing Safety Element of the Saratoga General Plan adopted on
October 7, 1987.
The purpose of the General Plan Safety Element is to identify any natural or human activity - related
hazards that exist in Saratoga and define measures to address them. Some naturally occurring
hazards may be unavoidable, but the potential impact on Saratoga can be reduced through advance
planning and preparation. Thus, the Safety Element addresses geologic, seismic, flood, and fire
hazards and hazards created by human activity such as hazardous materials and incidents that call for
emergency protection. The Safety Element describes the City's efforts to prepare for and respond to
emergencies.
As part of this update, the City has initiated minor revisions to the existing goals and policies from
the 1987 General Plan Safety Element. These revisions range from minor grammatical edits,
changes reflecting new and/or changes in existing regulatory requirements, or new processes in place
since the previous element was prepared and adopted. However, these edits would not materially
affect the physical environment, nor result in any new environmental impacts not already
contemplated as part of the City's General Plan EIR, as they are designed to reduce or eliminate
potential hazards and promote safe construction practices within potentially hazardous areas of the
City.
9. Surrounding land uses and setting_
The City of Saratoga is located in the westerly portion of Santa Clara County just southwest of the
major metropolitan community of San Jose and approximately 35 miles south of San Francisco.
Saratoga is found at the southerly end of the San Francisco peninsula.
Page 3
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
The north, south and easterly portions of the community are sited on a historic alluvial plain shared
with the adjacent communities of Cupertino, San Jose, Los Gatos and Monte Sereno. The westerly
portion occupies low -lying foothills of the Santa Cruz Mountains and is adjacent to unincorporated
areas within Santa Clara County.
Major regional access to the community is provided by State Route 85 (SR -85), a six -lane freeway
linking to US 280 in Cupertino and US 101 to the north in Mountain View, US 101 south in San
Jose, and to SR 17 to north San Jose and southwest to Santa Cruz County. Local roadways linking
Saratoga to surrounding communities include Saratoga -Los Gatos Road, Saratoga Avenue, Highway
9 and Saratoga- Sunnyvale Road.
10. Other public agencies whose review is required
a. California Geological Survey
b. Santa Clara County Geologist
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project. Please see the checklist
beginning on page 7 for additional information.
❑
Aesthetics
❑
Agriculture and Forestry
❑
Air Quality
❑
Biological Resources
❑
Cultural Resources
❑
Geology /Soils
❑
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
❑
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
❑
Hydrology /Water Quality
❑
Land Use /Planning
❑
Mineral Resources
❑
Noise
❑
Population /Housing
❑
Public Services
❑
Recreation
❑
Transportation /Traffic
❑
Utilities /Service Systems
❑
Mandatory Findings of
Significance
DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
Printed Name: Cynthia McCormick
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be
❑
a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the
project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
❑
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless
mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
❑
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
❑
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that
earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed
upon the proposed project, nothing further is required
Signature:
Date:
Printed Name: Cynthia McCormick
For:
Page 4
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by
the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer
is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to
projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer
should be explained where it is based on project- specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project
will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project - specific screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as
well as project - level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers
must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than
significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be
significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made,
an EIR is required.
4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation
of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant
Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the
effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be
cross - referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect
has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a
brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope
of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state
whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
C) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier
document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential
impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document
should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals
contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies
should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects
in whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
Page 5
50
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
I. AESTHETICS: Would the project:
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with
Impact
Mitigation
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista
❑
❑
X
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
❑
1-1
X
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within
a state scenic highway
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality
D
❑
X
of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would
❑
❑
X
adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
DISCUSSION:
a -d) This update to the General Plan Safety Element does not propose any actions that would directly
result in development of a specific site or fundamentally change an area within the City. The goals and
policies within the General Plan Safety Element are intended to reduce or eliminate potentially
hazardous conditions and ensure that construction within potentially hazardous areas of the City is
implemented safely.
The 1981 General Plan EIR identified significant impacts to aesthetics that would occur as a result of
changes to the viewshed, these impacts were previously analyzed in the EIR. Adoption and
implementation of the updated Safety Element goals and policies would not adversely affect scenic
vistas, scenic resources, visual character, or create light /glare because it would not result in development
of a specific site or area within the City. In addition, the Open Space and Conservation Element of the
Saratoga General Plan provides an inventory of the scenic resources and identifies goals and policies for
the protection and preservation of these resources, which does not conflict with the proposed update. No
new impacts not already considered in the 1981 EIR would be generated as a result of this update to the
Safety Element.
Based on the above discussion, no mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on
Aesthetics.
(Source: review of the proposed Safety Element Update of the Saratoga General Plan, existing elements of the Saratoga
General Plan and the 1981 General Plan EIR).
Page 6
51
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES: In determining whether
impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as
an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In
determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are
significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information
compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range
Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and the forest
carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the
California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant with Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
❑
❑ X
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources
Agency, to non - agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
❑ X
contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined
❑ X
in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public
Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as
defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non- forest
❑ X
use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use or X
conversion of forest land to non - forest use?
DISCUSSION:
a -e) This update to the General Plan Safety Element does not propose any actions that would directly
result in development of a specific site or change areas of the City designated for agriculture or forestry
uses. The goals and policies within the General Plan Safety Element are intended to reduce or eliminate
potentially hazardous conditions and ensure that construction within potentially hazardous areas of the
City is implemented safely.
According to the Open Space and Conservation Element of the General Plan, Saratoga contains a
number of agricultural sites of varying sizes, including agricultural lands that are currently under
Williamson Act contracts. The Open Space and Conservation Element identifies and analyzes these
resources and provides goals and policies for their protection and preservation. In addition, the General
Plan Land Use Element identifies hillside and open space related land uses, which are intended to
preserve the steeper areas of the City adjacent to forested areas within unincorporated Santa Clara
County. Adoption of the General Plan Safety Element goals and policies would not result in changes to
areas designated for agriculture or forestry uses and are consistent with the Open Space and
Conservation Element.
Based on the above discussion, no mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on
Agricultural and Forest Resources.
(Source: review of the proposed Safety Element Update of the Saratoga General Plan and the existing elements of the
Saratoga General Plan).
Page 7
52
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No Impact
applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied
Significant
Significant
Significant
upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
Impact
with Mitigation
Impact
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
❑
❑
F-1
X
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or
❑
❑
X
projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for
❑
❑
X
which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
D
❑
X
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
❑
❑
❑
X
DISCUSSION:
a -e) This update to the General Plan Safety Element does not propose any actions that would directly
result in development of a specific site or have any effect on the implementation of air quality plans.
Significant air quality impacts resulting from construction activities, construction vehicles, and an
increase in the amount of traffic were analyzed in the 1981 General Plan EIR. This analysis would not
be altered by this update to the Safety Element and no new air quality impacts would be generated. The
goals and policies within the General Plan Safety Element are intended to reduce or eliminate potentially
hazardous conditions and ensure that construction within potentially hazardous areas of the City is
implemented safely. Adoption and implementation of these goals and policies would not adversely
affect air quality because it would not result in development of a specific site or area within the City.
Based on the above discussion, no mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Air
Quality.
(Sources: review of the proposed Safety Element Update of the Saratoga General Plan, the existing elements of the Saratoga
General Plan, 1981 General Plan EIR, and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District CEQA Guidelines)
Page 8
53
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact with Mitigation Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat El El X
modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive ❑ ❑ X
natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or
by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as ❑ ❑ X
defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to,
marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or ❑ ❑ X
migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological El ❑ X
resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, ❑ ❑ X
Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or
state habitat conservation plan?
DISCUSSION:
a -f) This update to the General Plan Safety Element does not propose any actions that would directly
result in development of a specific site or have any effect on areas designated for the protection of
biological or natural resources. The goals and policies within the General Plan Safety Element are
intended to reduce or eliminate potentially hazardous conditions and ensure that construction within
potentially hazardous areas of the City is implemented safely. Adoption and implementation of these
goals and policies would not adversely affect listed species, riparian habitat, sensitive natural
communities, or protected wetlands because development of a specific site or area within the City would
not occur. In addition, the Open Space and Conservation Element of the City of Saratoga General Plan
includes a discussion of wildlife and plant species within Saratoga and its Sphere of Influence and
provides goals and policies for the protection and preservation of these resources. Adoption of the
goals and policies within the General Plan Safety Element would be consistent with the Open Space and
Conservation Element.
No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Biological Resources.
(Source: review of the proposed Safety Element Update of the Saratoga General Plan and the existing elements of the
Saratoga General Plan).
Page 9
54
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with
Impact
Mitigation
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
F-1
F-1
X
historical resource as defined in §15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
❑
❑
X
archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
❑
❑
X
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside
❑
❑
X
of formal cemeteries?
DISCUSSION:
a -d) This update to the General Plan Safety Element does not propose any actions that would directly
result in development of a specific site or have any effect on areas designated for the protection of
cultural, architectural, historical, paleontological, or archeological resources. The goals and policies
within the General Plan Safety Element are intended to reduce or eliminate potentially hazardous
conditions and ensure that construction within potentially hazardous areas of the City is implemented
safely. Adoption and implementation of these goals and policies would not result in the disturbance of
known significant historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources; and would not result in the
disturbance of known sites with human remains.
No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Cultural Resources.
(Source: review of the proposed Safety Element Update of the Saratoga General Plan and the existing elements of the
Saratoga General Plan).
Page 10
55
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No Impact
Significant Significant Significant
Impact with Mitigation Impact
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent
❑
❑
❑ X
Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known
fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42?
F-1
❑ X
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
❑
❑
❑ X
iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction?
❑
❑
❑ X
iv) Landslides?
❑
❑
❑ X
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
F-1
❑
❑ X
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would
❑
❑
❑ X
become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or
off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform
F-1
❑ X
Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or
❑
El X
alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of waste water?
DISCUSSION:
a -e) The General Plan Safety Element provides an inventory and generalized mapping of natural and
man -made hazards (landslides, unstable soils, faults, etc...) within the City. The mapping indicates that
areas of the City and Sphere of Influence may be subject to geologic and seismic hazards. The 1981
General Plan EIR identified significant geological impacts could result from groundshaking and poorly
consolidated soils. The goals and policies within the General Plan Safety Element are intended to reduce
or eliminate potentially hazardous conditions and ensure that construction within potentially hazardous
areas of the City is implemented safely.
Adoption and implementation of the General Plan Safety Element would reduce the exposure of people
and/ or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving geologic instability and seismic -
related activity. Implementation of the goals and policies within the General Plan Safety Element, along
with adherence to existing rules and regulations (California Building Code, National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination Systems, etc...) would continue to minimize impacts associated with soil erosion or loss of
topsoil, and prevent the placement of structures on unstable soils. The analysis provided in the 1981
General Plan EIR remains consistent with this update and no additional geological impacts would be
generated. As a result impacts associated with geology and soils are anticipated to be further reduced
with adoption and implementation of these goals and policies.
No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Geology and Soils.
(Source: review of the proposed Safety Element Update of the Saratoga General Plan and the existing elements of the
Saratoga General Plan).
Page 11
56
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS:
An assessment of the greenhouse gas emissions and climate
change is included in the body of environmental document.
While Caltrans has included this good faith effort in order to
provide the public and decision - makers as much information as
possible about the project, it is Caltrans determination that in the
absence of further regulatory or scientific information related to
GHG emissions and CEQA significance, it is too speculative to
make a significance determination regarding the project's direct
and indirect impact with respect to climate change. Caltrans
does remain firmly committed to implementing measures to help
reduce the potential effects of the project. These measures are
outlined in the body of the environmental document.
Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
Potentially Less Than Less Than No Impact
Significant Significant with Significant
Impact Mitigation Impact
u
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted ❑
for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
DISCUSSION:
❑
❑ X
❑
❑ X
a -b) This update to the General Plan Safety Element does not propose any actions that would directly
result in development of a specific site, nor does it propose any actions that would conflict or have any
other affect on the implementation of existing plans or policies intended to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. The goals and policies within the General Plan Safety Element are intended to reduce or
eliminate potentially hazardous conditions and ensure that construction within potentially hazardous
areas of the City is implemented safely. Adoption and implementation of these goals and policies will
not generate greenhouse gas emissions within the City.
Therefore, based on the discussion above, no mitigation is necessary or required in relation to
Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
(Source: review of the proposed Safety Element Update of the Saratoga General Plan and the existing elements of the
Saratoga General Plan).
Page 12
57
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS:
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No Impact
Significant
Significant with
Significant
Would the project:
Impact
Mitigation
Impact
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
❑
❑
❑
X
the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
❑
X
reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
❑
X
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of
an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
❑
X
materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such
❑
❑
X
a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project
El
❑
X
result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project
area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted
El
❑
X
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or
❑
❑
X
death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent
to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
DISCUSSION:
a -h) This update to the General Plan Safety Element does not propose any actions that would directly
result in development of a specific site or have any effect on areas of the City. The General Plan Safety
Element provides generalized mapping and information pertaining to hazardous materials, wildland fire
threats, and emergency evacuation. The goals and policies within the General Plan Safety Element are
intended to reduce or eliminate potentially hazardous conditions and ensure that construction within
potentially hazardous areas of the City is implemented safely. Adoption and implementation of these
goals and policies is anticipated to reduce potential exposure of people and/ or structures to substantial
adverse effects involving hazardous materials, wildland fires, and/ or emergency situations.
Therefore, based on the discussion above, no mitigation is necessary or required in relation to
Hazards and Hazardous Materials.
(Source: review of the proposed Safety Element Update of the Saratoga General Plan and the existing elements of the
Saratoga General Plan).
Page 13
W
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact with Impact
Mitigation
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing ❑ ❑ X
nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or
planned uses for which permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in ❑ ❑ ❑ X
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or ❑ ❑ X
amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of
❑
❑ X
polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
❑
❑ X
g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood
X
Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect
E]
❑ X
flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving
X
flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow
❑
❑
El X
DISCUSSION:
a j) This update to the General Plan Safety Element does not propose any actions that would directly
result in development of a specific site or fundamentally change an area within the City. The General
Plan Safety Element provides generalized mapping and information regarding flooding impact potential
and impacts associated with dam failure. The policies and actions in the General Plan Safety Element
are designed to protect people and structures in the City of Saratoga from flooding hazards, control
erosion and sedimentation, and protect water quality. The 1981 General Plan EIR determined that
stormwater runoff would result in a significant impact due to an increase in the amount of impervious
surfaces within the City. These findings would not be affected by this update to the Safety Element and
no new impacts would be generated. Adoption and implementation of the Safety Element goals and
policies would reduce exposure of people or structures to potential adverse effects from flood hazards,
would not violate adopted water quality or wastewater standards, would not alter existing drainage
patterns, or exceed planned flows of stormwater runoff for drainage systems.
Based on the above discussion, no mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on
Hydrology and Water Quality Resources.
(Sources: Review of the project, FEMA Flood Hazard Mapping) (Source: review of the proposed Safety Element Update of
the Saratoga General Plan and the existing elements of the Saratoga General Plan).
Page 14
59
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
X. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Impact
Significant Significant Significant
Impact with Mitigation Impact
a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
b)Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an ❑ ❑ F-1 X
agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the
general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural ❑ ❑ X
community conservation plan?
DISCUSSION:
a -c) This update to the General Plan Safety Element does not propose any actions that would directly
result in development of a specific site, fundamentally change an area within the City, or require any
revisions to zoned density or land use designation for any parcel. The goals and policies within the
General Plan Safety Element are intended to reduce or eliminate potentially hazardous conditions and
ensure that construction within potentially hazardous areas of the City is implemented safely. Adoption
and implementation of these goals and policies would not physically divide an established community
and would not conflict with any established land use plan, policy, or regulation which was adopted for
the purpose of mitigation or avoiding an environmental impact.
Therefore, no mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Land Use and
Planning.
(Sources: Review of the project, Saratoga Municipal Code, Saratoga General) (Source: review of the proposed Safety
Element Update of the Saratoga General Plan and the existing elements of the Saratoga General Plan).
Page 15
.1
XI. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally - important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general
plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
DISCUSSION:
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
Potentially Less Than Significant Less Than No
Significant Impact with Mitigation Significant Impact Impact
❑
❑
❑ X
❑
❑
❑ X
a -b) This update to the General Plan Safety Element does not propose any actions that would directly
result in development of a specific site and does not propose any actions that would result in a loss of
availability of a known or locally - important mineral resource. Currently there are no known mines or
quarries operating in Saratoga or its Sphere of Influence. The goals and policies within the General Plan
Safety Element are intended to reduce or eliminate potentially hazardous conditions and ensure that
construction within potentially hazardous areas of the City is implemented safely. The adoption and
implementation of these goals and policies would not impact a known or locally - important mineral
resource.
In addition, the Open Space and Conservation Element of the City of Saratoga General Plan includes a
discussion of the mineral resources within the Saratoga vicinity (primarily sandstone and shale).
Adoption and implementation of the General Plan Safety Element goals and policies would be consistent
with the Open Space and Conservation Element.
Therefore, based on the discussion above, no mitigation is necessary or required in relation to
impacts on Mineral Resources.
(Source: review of the proposed Safety Element Update of the Saratoga General Plan and the existing elements of the
Saratoga General Plan).
Page 16
61
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
XII. NOISE: Would the project result in:
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No Impact
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
with Mitigation
Impact
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
El
E
X
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration
El
X
or groundborne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project
El
El
X
vicinity above levels existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the
El
El
X
project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan
El
X
has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project El El X
expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
DISCUSSION:
a -d) This update to the General Plan Safety Element does not propose any actions that would directly
result in development of a specific site and does not propose any actions that would increase current
noise levels. The goals and policies within the General Plan Safety Element are intended to reduce or
eliminate potentially hazardous conditions and ensure that construction within potentially hazardous
areas of the City is implemented safely. Adoption and implementation of these goals and policies would
not result in activities that would generate noise levels in excess of established standards in the General
Plan.
The 1981 General Plan EIR found that significant noise impacts would result from an increase in the
amount of traffic. The analysis conducted in the General Plan EIR remains consistent with this update to
the Safety Element and no additional noise impacts would be generated. In addition, the Saratoga
General Plan Noise Element provides an inventory and map of existing noise sources and noise sensitive
locations, which is consistent with the proposed General Plan Safety Element update.
Therefore, based on the discussion above, no mitigation is necessary or required in relation to
Noise impacts.
(Source: review of the proposed Safety Element Update of the Saratoga General Plan, existing elements of the Saratoga
General Plan, and 1981 General Plan EIR).
Page 17
62
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project:
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with Mitigation
Impact
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example,
❑
X
by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the
❑
❑
X
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of
❑
0
X
replacement housing elsewhere?
DISCUSSION:
a -c) This update to the General Plan Safety Element does not propose any actions that would directly
result in development of a specific site or fundamentally change an area within the City and therefore
would not result in City population growth. The goals and policies within the General Plan Safety
Element are intended to reduce or eliminate potentially hazardous conditions and ensure that
construction within potentially hazardous areas of the City is implemented safely. Adoption and
implementation of these goals and policies would not induce substantial population growth, either
directly or indirectly, and would not displace existing housing or substantial numbers of people.
Therefore, based on the discussion above, no mitigation is necessary or required in relation to
impacts on Population and Housing.
(Source: review of the proposed Safety Element Update of the Saratoga General Plan and the existing elements of the
Saratoga General Plan).
Page 18
63
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES:
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated
with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for
new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service
ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public
services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
DISCUSSION:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact with Mitigation Impact
❑
❑
❑ X
X
❑
❑
❑
X
❑
❑
❑
X
❑
❑
❑
X
❑
❑
❑
a) This update to the General Plan Safety Element does not propose any projects or actions that would
directly result in development of a specific site or fundamentally change an area of the City, therefore
public facilities related to fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, or other public services
would not be required to expand. The goals and policies within the General Plan Safety Element are
intended to reduce or eliminate potentially hazardous conditions and ensure that construction within
potentially hazardous areas of the City is implemented safely. The Safety Element goals and policies
require the installation of early warning fire alarm systems within single family residences, multi - family
residences, and commercial structures, and the continued enforcement of existing regulations for
wildland -urban interface areas would improve the Fire Department's ability to respond to fire situations
and reduce potential fire hazards in areas of the City most susceptible to fire.
The 1981 General Plan EIR identified significant impacts to public services would be generated due to
an increase in number of residential units. These impacts were analyzed in the General Plan EIR and
would not change as a result of this update to the Safety Element. Adoption and implementation of the
Safety Element goals and policies is intended to assist public services, such as fire and police during
emergency events due to the improved information and goals and policies established to protect
residents and businesses within Saratoga. No new impacts would be generated as a result of the update
to the Safety Element that were not previously analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
Therefore, based on the discussion above, no mitigation is necessary or required in relation to
impacts on Public Services.
(Source: review of the proposed Safety Element Update of the Saratoga General Plan, existing elements of the Saratoga
General Plan and the 1981 General Plan EIR).
Page 19
M
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
XV. RECREATION:
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than No
Significant
Significant
Significant Impact
Impact
with Mitigation
Impact
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks
❑
❑ X
or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or ❑ ❑ X
expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment?
DISCUSSION:
a -b) This update to the General Plan Safety Element does not propose any actions that would directly
result in development of a specific site or fundamentally change an area within the City and would not
have a negative impact on the availability of recreation facilities or parks. The goals and policies within
the General Plan Safety Element are intended to reduce or eliminate potentially hazardous conditions
and ensure that construction within potentially hazardous areas of the City is implemented safely.
Adoption and implementation of these goals and policies would not result in greater demand for
recreational facilities and parks. In addition, these goals and policies do not conflict with the Saratoga
Open Space and Conservation Element, which includes a list of parks and recreation areas and provides
goals and policies to ensure that parks and trails are developed, protected, and preserved.
No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Recreation.
(Source: review of the proposed Safety Element Update of the Saratoga General Plan and the existing elements of the
Saratoga General Plan).
Page 20
65
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
XVI. TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC: Would the project:
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than No
limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other
Significant
Significant
Significant Impact
standards established by the county congestion management agency for
Impact
with Mitigation
Impact
a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of
❑
❑ X
effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all
❑
❑ X
modes of transportation including mass transit and non - motorized travel and
relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to
❑
❑ X
intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and
mass transit?
❑
❑ X
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not
❑
❑ X
limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other
standards established by the county congestion management agency for
designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic
❑
❑ X
levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
❑
❑ X
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
❑
❑ X
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs regarding public transit, ❑ ❑ X
bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety
of such facilities?
DISCUSSION:
a -f) This update to the General Plan Safety Element does not propose any actions that would directly
result in development of a specific site or fundamentally change an area within the City and would not
have a negative impact on traffic. The Circulation and Scenic Highway Element of the City of Saratoga
General Plan addresses all modes of travel and provides goals and policies to guide the development and
maintenance of the transportation system. The 1981 General Plan EIR identified significant impacts
would result from an increase in traffic. These impacts were analyzed in the General Plan EIR and
would not be affected by this update to the Safety Element.
The goals and policies within the General Plan Safety Element are intended to reduce or eliminate
potentially hazardous conditions and ensure that construction within potentially hazardous areas of the
City is implemented safely. An important aspect of the element is community evacuation in response to
an emergency/ disaster event. The General Plan Safety Element provides recommended evacuation
routes, which indicate the preferred routes of movement that should be followed in order to
accommodate safe and efficient evacuation of residents and businesses. These routes are designed to
relocate people within the City from hazardous areas to safer locations during an emergency event.
Through the use and promotion of these evacuation routes, City residents and businesses are better
informed and prepared to evacuate using these specified routes, which will relocate them away from
hazardous areas. If a larger proportion of residents and businesses within the City understand and use
these routes, then first responder agencies (Police and Fire) will spend less time assisting in evacuation
efforts and be able to dedicate more resources to emergency response efforts associated with the disaster
situation. Adoption and implementation of these goals and policies would have a positive impact on
traffic and circulation during an emergency event.
No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to Transportation and Traffic.
(Source: review of the proposed Safety Element Update of the Saratoga General Plan existing elements of the Saratoga
General Plan, and the 1981 General Plan EIR ).
Page 21
..
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional
Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater
treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing
entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate
the project's solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to
solid waste?
DISCUSSION:
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than
No Impact
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
with Mitigation
Impact
❑
❑
❑
X
❑
❑
X
❑
❑
❑
❑
X
❑
❑
❑
X
❑
❑
❑
X
❑
❑
❑
X
❑
❑
❑
X
a -g) This update to the General Plan Safety Element does not propose any actions that would directly
result in development of a specific site, fundamentally change an area within the City, and would not
have a negative impact on utilities or service systems. The 1981 General Plan EIR identified significant
impacts to public services and utilities would result due to an increase in number of residential units.
These impacts were analyzed in the General Plan EIR and remain consistent with this update to the
Safety Element. The goals and policies within the General Plan Safety Element are intended to reduce or
eliminate potentially hazardous conditions and ensure that construction within potentially hazardous
areas of the City is implemented safely. Adoption and implementation of these goals and policies would
result in fewer physical impacts to existing utilities and/or service systems, since additional requirements
in high hazard areas would be required. Through compliance of these additional requirements, (pipes
with flexible joints, hazard setbacks, etc...) utilities within certain areas of Saratoga would be more
resilient to disaster and hazard events. No impacts would be generated by this update to the Safety
Element that were not already considered in the 1981 General Plan EIR.
No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Utilities and Service Systems.
(Source: review of the proposed Safety Element Update of the Saratoga General Plan, existing elements of the Saratoga
General Plan and the 1981 General Plan EIR).
Page 22
67
Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
City of Saratoga General Plan Safety Element Update
XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Potentially
Less Than
Less Than No
Significant
Significant
Significant Impact
Impact
with Mitigation
Impact
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the
❑
❑ X
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten
to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively El ❑ ❑ X
considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the
effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial ❑ ❑ X
adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
DISCUSSION:
a -c) The proposed project, the update to the Saratoga General Plan Safety Element will not have
significant new impacts on the environment or cumulative impacts on the environment. The goals and
policies within the General Plan Safety Element are intended to reduce or eliminate potentially
hazardous conditions and ensure that construction within potentially hazardous areas of the City is
implemented safely. Adoption and implementation of these goals and policies will not require any
changes to existing zoning or general plan designations for parcels within the City limits or Sphere of
Influence. No Impacts are anticipated.
No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts associated with Mandatory Findings
of Significance.
(Source: review of the proposed Safety Element Update of the Saratoga General Plan and the existing elements of the
Saratoga General Plan).
Page 23
.:
CITY COUNCIL
REVIEW DRAFT
February 2013
Aw w "Ah
This element established goals,
Policies, and implementation
measures to assist the City of
Saratoga in assuring that the
community is safe from natural
and man -made hazards.
Prepared for:
City of Saratoga
Planning Department
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, California 95070
Prepared by:
RBF Consulting
3300 E. Guasti Road, Suite 100
Ontario, California 91761
CITY OF SARATOGA SAFETY ELEMENT 1 2013
70
CITY Ot'W
SARATWA
Adopted: ,2013
Previously Adopted: October 7, 1987
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Purpose of the Safety Element ............................................................ ............................... 1
II. Hazard Identification ............................................................................ ............................... 1
A. Regional Soils and Land Instability Hazards ............................. ............................... 2
i. General Geology and Physical Characteristics ................... ...............................
3
ii. Landslide and Slope Instability .......................................... ...............................
4
iii. Soil Creep and Expansive Soils ........................................... ...............................
8
iv. Regulatory Framework ...................................................... ...............................
8
B. Seismic Hazards ...................................................................... ...............................
11
i. Primary Seismic Hazards .................................................. ...............................
11
ii. Secondary Seismic Hazards .............................................. ...............................
15
iii. Regulatory Framework .................................................... ...............................
23
C. Flood Hazards ......................................................................... ...............................
24
i. Historical Data on Flooding in Saratoga ........................... ...............................
25
ii. Identification of Areas Subject to Flooding ..................... ...............................
25
iii. Flood Control and Land Development Review ................ ...............................
26
iv. Flood Control and Emergency Services ........................... ...............................
29
v. Regulatory Framework .................................................... ...............................
29
D. Fire Hazards ............................................................................ ............................... 30
i. Fire Protection in Saratoga .............................................. ............................... 31
ii. Assessment of Fire Risk in Wildland Areas ...................... ............................... 32
iii. Regulatory Framework — Fire Protection ......................... ............................... 37
iv. Hazardous Materials Storage and Disposal ..................... ............................... 37
v. Regulatory Framework - Hazardous Materials ................ ............................... 38
E. Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Planning .................. ............................... 40
i. Emergency Operations Plan Purpose and Organization .. ............................... 41
ii. Emergency Evacuation Plan ............................................. ............................... 42
iii. Regulatory Framework .................................................... ............................... 46
Draft February 2013
71
m7Lj]
CITY Ot'w
SARATW& TABLE OF •
III. Goals, Policies and Implementation Programs .................................. ............................... 46
A. Context for Safety Element Policy ......................................... ............................... 46
i. Land Instability Hazards ................................................... ............................... 47
ii. Flood Hazards ................................................................... ............................... 47
iii. Fire Hazards ...................................................................... ............................... 48
iv. Emergency Preparedness ................................................ ............................... 49
B. Goals, Policies, and Implementation Measures .................... ............................... 50
i. Land Instability Hazards ................................................... ............................... 50
ii. Seismic Hazards ................................................................ ............................... 51
iii. Flood Hazards ................................................................... ............................... 51
iv. Fire Hazards ...................................................................... ............................... 52
v. Emergency Preparedness ................................................ ............................... 54
References......................................................................................... ............................... 56
Appendices......................................................................................... ............................... 57
Draft February 2013
72
CIIY 0��w
SARATWA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXHIBITS
1 Geologic Map ....................................................................................... ............................... 5
2 Landslide Areas .................................................................................... ...............................
9
3 Fault Location Map and Earthquake Fault Zones .............................. ...............................
13
4 Liquefaction Areas ............................................................................ ...............................
17
5 Dam Failure Inundation Areas ........................................................... ...............................
21
6 FEMA Flood Zones ............................................................................. ...............................
27
7 Fire Hazard Zones ............................................................................... ...............................
33
8 Evacuation Routes ............................................................................. ...............................
43
TABLES
1 Hazard Analysis Likelihood of Occurrence ......................................... ............................... 41
2 American Red Cross Shelters ............................................................. ............................... 45
Draft February 2013
73
og
CIIY 0��W
SARATWA
Draft February 2013
This page was intentionally left blank
74
Lnr pit
A RAT
SAFETY ELEMENT
I. PURPOSE OF THE SAFETY ELEMENT
The Safety Element describes natural and human activity - related hazards that exist in Saratoga
and the measures to address them. Some naturally occurring hazards may be unavoidable, but
the potential impact on Saratoga can be reduced through advance planning and preparation.
Thus, the Safety Element addresses geologic, seismic, flood, and fire hazards, as well as
hazards created by human activity such as hazardous materials and waste and incidents that
call for emergency protection, at a policy level within the City. Anticipating emergencies will
occur even when precautions are taken against hazards, the Safety Element describes the
City's efforts to prepare for and respond to emergencies; however, the Safety Element does not
take the place of the City's Emergency Operations Plan. For additional information regarding
the Emergency Operations Plan, refer to Section II.E - Emergency Preparedness and Disaster
Planning.
Furthermore, California Government Code Section 65302(g)(1) requires that a General Plan
include:
" A safety element for the protection of the community from any unreasonable risks
associated with the effects of seismically induced surface rupture, ground shaking, ground
failure, tsunami, seiche, and dam failure; slope instability leading to mudslides and landslides;
subsidence, liquefaction, and other seismic hazards identified pursuant to Chapter 7.8
(commencing with Section 2690) of Division 2 of the Public Resources Code, and other geologic
hazards known to the legislative body; flooding; and wildland and urban fires ...."
II. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
The identification of hazards that affect the City is the initial step in the safety planning process.
Hazard identification is the most important stage in this process since inaccurate hazard
identification and the formulation of inadequate safety land use policies could result in
unnecessary loss of life, injury and property damage.
The types of natural hazards that have affected Saratoga in the past and those that may affect it
in the future can be identified with a high degree of accuracy. Geologic, flood and fire hazards
have all caused considerable damage within Bay Area communities in the past. Although the
Draft February 2013
75
Lnr pit
A RAT
SAFETY ELEMENT
extent of damage resulting from future natural hazards is unknown, it is likely that the
consequences will be similar to those produced in the past. Accurate hazard identification
utilizes historical information to predict future hazards and potential risks to current and
proposed land uses and activities.
A. REGIONAL SOILS AND LAND INSTABILITY HAZARDS
The physical and geologic characteristics of Saratoga have the potential to produce geologic
related problems for land development. Land development in areas of geologic instability can
expose life and property to hazards caused by seismic and non - seismic conditions. When
structures or roads are built on geologically unstable land, such as landslide areas or unstable
slopes and soils, there is a definitive risk to the community.
Geologic hazards are unavoidable in California. However, some geologic conditions represent
greater hazards than others. Faulting and unstable bedrock present great risks, while surface
instabilities can often be engineered to make construction safe. When unstable soil combines
with steep slopes, development conditions can be subject to landslide hazards. Recognizing
and delineating hazards that could result in injuries, property damage and economic or social
dislocations is an important function of the City planning process to protect the public health,
safety and welfare of the community.
Saratoga is located within the Santa Clara Valley, situated at the southern end of San Francisco
Bay. The valley is characterized as a depression that has been subsiding and filling with
sediment during the Quaternary Period.' Deposition of alluvial2 and fluvia13 sediments during
this time has been influenced by both subsidence and the climatic and base level changes
associated with past glaciations and sea level fluctuations.4 Research conducted within the San
Francisco Bay indicates that the valley floor within the San Jose region is blanketed by young
' Quaternary Period is the time period from 2.6 million years ago to present day.
2 Unconsolidated sediment deposited by a stream.
3 Produced by the action of a stream or river.
4 Liquefaction Hazards Maps for Three Earthquake Scenarios for the Communities of San Jose, Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos,
Los Gatos, Milpitas, Mountain View, Palo Alto, Santa Clara, Saratoga, and Sunnyvale, Northern Santa Clara County, California
Draft February 2013
76
Lnr pit
A RAT
SAFETY ELEMENT
alluvial deposits since the last ice age. Older alluvial deposits5 underlie these sediments and
crop out along the margins of the valley.6
The Saratoga area is primarily underlain by Pleistocene alluvial deposits with some exposed
bedrock within the hillside areas. The existing soils and bedrock pose a potential landslide or
liquefaction hazard for future development. Refer to Exhibit 1, Geologic Map for a depiction of
the generalized geology of the City.
i. General Geology and Physical Characteristics
Topography
The topography of Saratoga includes the low -lying relatively flat valley floor and the
northwestern foothills. Outside the City limits, but within Saratoga's Sphere of Influence, are the
Castle Rock portions of the Santa Cruz Mountains. These mountains are very rugged,
comprised of steep canyons and sharp to rounded ridge tops.
Vegetation
The mountain areas located within Saratoga's Sphere of Influence are heavily vegetated.
Hardwood trees of oak and madrone are abundant in this area, as well as redwood and Douglas
fir. The canyon floors near streams are covered with sycamore, elder and maple trees. Much
of the area is densely covered with chaparral, with only a few areas covered with grass.
Geology
A fault zone is composed of a complex system of fault traces and fractured rock. The San
Andreas Fault Zone is a dominant geologic feature within the State of California. This fault zone
is the boundary between the Pacific and North American Tectonic Plates, which has played a
crucial role in California's geologic history. The southwestern most corner of the Saratoga
Sphere of Influence is bisected by a northwest- southeast trending segment of the San Andreas
Fault zone. The location of this fault zone along the eastern side of the Santa Cruz Mountains
has played a major role in the geologic and topographic characteristics of the area by
separating two different rock assemblages and their associated erosional characteristics.
5 Deposits placed during the Pleistocene era (1.8 million years ago to 11,000 years ago)
6 Liquefaction Hazards Maps for Three Earthquake Scenarios for the Communities of San Jose, Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos,
Los Gatos, Milpitas, Mountain View, Palo Alto, Santa Clara, Saratoga, and Sunnyvale, Northern Santa Clara County, California
Draft February 2013
77
C17Y OF
A R. A T if r ar�f1scd.
0 SAFETY ELEMENT
The rock formations to the east of the San Andreas Fault are composed of sandstone, shale,
volcanic rocks, with minor amounts of diabase and gabbro. The mountain area is separated
from the flat area within the City limits by the Santa Clara Formation composed of
unconsolidated to semi - consolidated gravel, sand and clay.
The valley floor of Saratoga is comprised of alluvial deposits (varying in age) from the creeks
and streams flowing from the mountainous area. The alluvium is composed of unconsolidated
particles consisting of clay, silt, sand and gravel, which are classified as agricultural soils by the
United States Natural Resources Conservation Service.
ii. Landslide and Slope Instability
Most landslides occur naturally, however some damaging landslides can result from careless or
poorly planned construction. When construction is allowed in areas where landslides exist or
where landslide susceptibility is high, the potential for substantial property loss and human
endangerment increases. The potential public costs for the repair of roads and utilities or
disaster relief make it imperative that the City restrict development in geologically hazardous
areas.
Most sloping land has some potential for landsliding. Slope stability is affected by several
interrelated factors, such as steepness of slope, weak unconsolidated soil units or formations
with a high clay content, water saturation, vegetation removal and seismic activity. Usually, a
combination of several factors will bring the hillside to the verge of failure and a single factor,
such as heavy rainfall or an earthquake, will be the catalyst responsible for initiating slope
failure. The development of sites where these conditions exist may also trigger landslide
activity.
Landslides and slope instability are the major non - seismic geologic hazards in Saratoga. This is
due to the unstable nature of the geologic materials and the steep topography in areas of the
City. Although most of the hillside areas in the City experience these hazards to some degree,
the most severe risks are found in the western portion of the City within the vicinity of the
Berrocal Fault, where the topography becomes much steeper and geologic units are more
prone to larger landslides.
Draft February 2013
I l•_. .... CUP T41�
J
r 1 s
I I 1 'f d
Cox Ave. -
V
• >
f eQt • �' �i-.
SARATOGA► tee,
• • • —� rn e� dea\ T
♦ ♦ ate 0\ -
T a
' d' Allendale Ave.
• ♦ -- '� - Vie' to
• 1 * 1 f �j ata�o� - offal �et� ' Sobey Rd.
• 1 ) �� �`, a Douglas Ln. Ja5 IGryy ;
• 1 � r
L �
S Oa > I 7V
Congress Spring Rd. _ �"� _
1 ' f 1. , � S -
(HWY 9) ; 1 1 o !o
♦ oc tea'`
• ; •1 arRd• � Rd.iy
• ♦ice•. �� - �� � -- _
' r 4r
• • UMN RPORATr= SANTA CLARA COUNT' • �� - .� �1 / j�/1 MOE-
E
• • f /r 1
Legend
'1
Alluvial Deposits �- _ Saratoga City Limits
,I
Artificial Fill Saratoga Sphere of Influence
I,
Bedrock _ ' Surrounding City Boundaries
Water
N SAFETY ELEMENT
CITY OF we o Aso ,soo 3,000Feet Geologic Map
SARA 5
Prepared by RBF Consulting: 12/04/2012
Sources: City of Saratoga - Zoning WM (2010) : County of Santa Clara - Cityl-imits (2010) StreetEdge (2009) Exhibit 1
USGS Geologic Map (1999)�ESRI Terrain Basemap
CIIY 0��W
SARATWA
Draft February 2013
This page was intentionally left blank
'�
C17Y OF
A R. A T if r ar�f1scd.
SAFETY ELEMENT I
Exhib#2, LandsiideAreas, illustrates where major portions of the City of Saratoga are underlain
by materials that are subject to landsliding. These soils are moderately stable when dry, but
moderately unstable when saturated. Within the City boundaries, landslides are most likely to
occur where silt and clay have been eroded along stream channels traversing the City and
within large preexisting landslide deposits. Detailed geotechnical maps illustrating the areas
within the City most susceptible to instability issues are provided in Appendix C — Geologic and
Seismic Hazards Constraints Mapping.
The upper portion of landslide area(s) includes the hilly region south of Congress Springs Road,
part of the natural channel of Saratoga Creek, a section of the Congress Springs Road
alignment, and a considerable amount of the low foothills located north of the road. Slope
movements have been noted in this region for over 50 years. The Congress Springs Road
surface is significantly deformed and has been elevated approximately 14 feet since 1931 when
the present alignment was constructed. All man -made structures within or south of this area
have experienced extensive structural damage.
Saratoga also contains rock formations conducive to landslides. These formations are primarily
exposed within the hillside portions of the City and Sphere of Influence west of Saratoga -
Sunnyvale Road and southwest of Saratoga Los Gatos Road (Highway 9). Other areas within
the City susceptible to landslides include portions of the Saratoga Creek drainage area, and the
hillside areas west of San Tomas Aquinas Creek, east of Fruitvale Avenue, between Allendale
Avenue and Highway 9. Landslides and unstable slopes are prevalent in this area, and can
create hazards within the City limits as the slide debris and rock move toward the City's valley
floor.
Active landsliding can also be traced across Belnap Way, Bohlman Road and On Orbit Drive
and private driveways at a number of locations within the hillsides around Congress Springs.
This area is considered an extremely high -risk area for development, even in those areas that
appear to be stable at the present time. The equilibrium of even the most stable ground within
this hillside could be destroyed by the advent of road construction, irrigation, alteration of natural
drainage, or the introduction of septic tank effluent. Rapid failure of these slopes could cause
considerable property damage, personal injury or loss of life.
Draft February 2013
C17Y OF
A R. A T if r ar�f1scd.
0 SAFETY ELEMENT I
The most extensive occurrence of landslide deposits is in the central portion of the watershed
located north and south of the Mt. Eden Road - Pierce Road intersection. Examples of these
large slide deposits are located on Pike Road. Within the same general area, the Quarry Road
slide adjacent to the Calabazas Creek has moved part of the roadbed into the creek. Updated
geotechnical maps identifying land instability issues within Saratoga are provided in Appendix
C.
iii. Soil Creep and Expansive Solls
Soil creep is the slow, down slope movement of near - surface materials. Soil creep is prevalent
in Saratoga, primarily in the western hillside regions of the City. The rate of soil creep is a
function of slope angle, soil thickness and texture. It can be regarded as a continuous process,
and may cause retaining walls, foundations and paved roads to fail over a period of time
unaccompanied by any obvious signs of slope failure. The presence of soil creep should not
have a prohibitive effect on land use, but should alert the City to require appropriate
geotechnical investigations to evaluate conditions and to impose engineering solutions to
mitigate problems.
Expansive soils contain high proportions of clay and alternately absorb and release large
amounts of water during wet and dry cycles. When structures are built on expansive soil,
foundations may rise during the wet season, resulting in cracked foundations, distorted
frameworks, and warped windows and doors. These adverse effects can be eliminated by
recognition of expansive soils and application of remedial measures for site development and
foundation design. All applications for site development and building permits should be
accompanied by soil reports in areas where expansive soils exist.
iv. Regulatory Framework
Regulations regarding development in problematic geotechnical areas throughout the City are
intended to protect citizens from potential geotechnical related hazards.
Federal Regulations
The purpose of the Federal Soil and Water Resources Conservation Act (1977) (16 United
States Code Section 2001 -2009) is to protect or restore the functions of the soil on a permanent
sustainable basis.
Draft February 2013
:.
\ � � Jj
— I
I
I , 1
1
• 1 - r
• �i
I
d.
i
• i
\) 1
• l 1 ,
1
• 1
1
1
• 1
•
•
Congress Spring Rd.
(HWY 9) �� o
3
J
mmj� 1w_
/I
01, tea` Fo
Y d ti Rd. S'P
1 , •
• r \
• 1
UNINCORPORATED SA CLARA I I NTy-- /
r
LE
t
Legend
Landslide Hazard Area
r: City Limits
Sphere of Influence
N SAFETY ELEMENT
ACITY R OAF T A W�E o �s0 t soo 3,000 Feet Landslide Areas
1 y_ 1 l y y_ Prepared by RBF Consulting: 12/04/2012
Sources: City of Saratoga - Zoning tA (2010) : County of Santa Clara - Cityl-imits (2010) StreetEdge (2009) Exhibit 2
Landslide Hazard (2006): WMI Terrain Basemap
♦ wa
•
`atioO
7
�a wejP
o y
Sobey Rd.
DouglasLn.
Jas G.pe
D
fj ?
!_. rf
q
01, tea` Fo
Y d ti Rd. S'P
1 , •
• r \
• 1
UNINCORPORATED SA CLARA I I NTy-- /
r
LE
t
Legend
Landslide Hazard Area
r: City Limits
Sphere of Influence
N SAFETY ELEMENT
ACITY R OAF T A W�E o �s0 t soo 3,000 Feet Landslide Areas
1 y_ 1 l y y_ Prepared by RBF Consulting: 12/04/2012
Sources: City of Saratoga - Zoning tA (2010) : County of Santa Clara - Cityl-imits (2010) StreetEdge (2009) Exhibit 2
Landslide Hazard (2006): WMI Terrain Basemap
♦ wa
•
CIIY 0��W
SARATWA
Draft February 2013
This page was intentionally left blank
01
Local Regulations
SAFETY ELEMENT
The City of Saratoga requires detailed geotechnical investigations for all land use proposals
located within geologically hazardous areas. Standards for development are listed in Article 16-
15 of the City's Building Code, which incorporates the most recent California Building Code.
Article 16 -15 enforces Title 24 California Regulations and Article 16 -17, which outlines permitted
excavation and grading procedures.
B. SEISMIC HAZARDS
The identification of earthquake hazards in Saratoga can be categorized as primary hazards
(i.e. fault rupture and seismic shaking) and secondary hazards. These hazards may include
liquefaction, seismically induced landslides, subsidence, and seismically induced water
inundation. Hazards increase in areas where seismic activity is combined with the potential for
flooding, poor soil drainage, unstable surficial soil and steep slope, fire hazard and deteriorated
structures and can result in extensive property damage, personal injury or death.
i. Primary Seismic Hazards
Identification of Active and Potentially Active Faults
The San Andreas Fault is the only known "active" fault in the vicinity of Saratoga. For planning
purposes, an "active" fault is one that has experienced displacement within the last 11,000
years and can be expected to move again. The proximity of the fault, which traverses the City's
Sphere of Influence along the ridge of the Santa Cruz Mountains, increases the probability of
severe lateral displacement and ground shaking should an earthquake occur. Due to the active
status given to this fault, it has been located within an Alquist - Priolo Special Study Zone, which
requires specialized study to determine the location of the fault during the planning stage of the
development process.
The Berrocal, Monta Vista, and Shannon Faults located within the City limits are considered
three "potentially active" faults lying on the alluvial plain. A "potentially active" fault is one that
has moved within the last 2 million to 11,000 years, and because it is considered capable of
ground rupture or shaking, poses an unacceptable risk to a proposed structure.
These "potentially active" faults do not have reliable evidence of recent displacement along their
fault traces. For this reason, the Santa Clara County Geologist has placed them in a special
Draft February 2013
Lnr pit
A RAT
Local Regulations
SAFETY ELEMENT
The City of Saratoga requires detailed geotechnical investigations for all land use proposals
located within geologically hazardous areas. Standards for development are listed in Article 16-
15 of the City's Building Code, which incorporates the most recent California Building Code.
Article 16 -15 enforces Title 24 California Regulations and Article 16 -17, which outlines permitted
excavation and grading procedures.
B. SEISMIC HAZARDS
The identification of earthquake hazards in Saratoga can be categorized as primary hazards
(i.e. fault rupture and seismic shaking) and secondary hazards. These hazards may include
liquefaction, seismically induced landslides, subsidence, and seismically induced water
inundation. Hazards increase in areas where seismic activity is combined with the potential for
flooding, poor soil drainage, unstable surficial soil and steep slope, fire hazard and deteriorated
structures and can result in extensive property damage, personal injury or death.
i. Primary Seismic Hazards
Identification of Active and Potentially Active Faults
The San Andreas Fault is the only known "active" fault in the vicinity of Saratoga. For planning
purposes, an "active" fault is one that has experienced displacement within the last 11,000
years and can be expected to move again. The proximity of the fault, which traverses the City's
Sphere of Influence along the ridge of the Santa Cruz Mountains, increases the probability of
severe lateral displacement and ground shaking should an earthquake occur. Due to the active
status given to this fault, it has been located within an Alquist - Priolo Special Study Zone, which
requires specialized study to determine the location of the fault during the planning stage of the
development process.
The Berrocal, Monta Vista, and Shannon Faults located within the City limits are considered
three "potentially active" faults lying on the alluvial plain. A "potentially active" fault is one that
has moved within the last 2 million to 11,000 years, and because it is considered capable of
ground rupture or shaking, poses an unacceptable risk to a proposed structure.
These "potentially active" faults do not have reliable evidence of recent displacement along their
fault traces. For this reason, the Santa Clara County Geologist has placed them in a special
Draft February 2013
Lnr pit
A RAT
SAFETY ELEMENT
study fault hazard zone consistent with the Santa Clara County Geologic Ordinance.'
Placement within this zone requires similar fault trenching studies as the Alquist - Priolo Special
Study Zones for properties within the unincorporated County areas. Since these faults are
located within the City of Saratoga, the City has the discretion to require studies deemed
adequate by the City's Geologist, which may deviate from the County's requirements.
The Berrocal Fault belongs to the Sargent Fault Zone, a complex system of interconnecting
faults extending northwest between the San Andreas and the Calaveras Faults. The fault trace
crosses Congress Springs Road and continues into the southeastern portion of the Sphere of
Influence. At least 0.5 mile of the Berrocal Fault within the City of Saratoga displayed
sympathetic ground cracking in response to the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake.
The Shannon Fault, part of the Monta Vista Fault system, closely parallels the State Highway 85
corridor from Regnart Creek (Cupertino) in the north, crossing Saratoga Avenue, and continuing
to the Almaden Expressway in the southeast portion of San Jose. Although there is a chance
that primary ground rupture could occur on either of these fault traces in the future, it is more
likely to occur on the San Andreas Fault. Exhibit 3, Fault Location Map and Earthquake Fault
Zones, illustrates the location of local faults that present a hazard to Saratoga.
Ground Shaking
The most widespread effect of an earthquake is ground shaking, or the movement of the earth's
surface in response to seismic activity. Ground shaking is often the greatest cause of physical
damage. Structures of all types, including buildings and utility facilities may suffer severe
damage or collapse if not properly designed to withstand the intensity of the shaking.
The major threat to people in both the City of Saratoga and its Sphere of Influence is structural
failure of buildings or failure of slopes due to shaking. Because of the steep slopes and network
of fault lines in the hillside areas closest to the San Andreas Fault Zone, it is essential to enforce
strict earthquake construction and soil engineering standards in order to select the most stable
building sites and to compensate for soil instabilities through the use of approved engineering
and construction techniques.
7 Title C, Division C12, Chapter IV of the Santa Clara County Municipal Code establishes minimum requirements for the geologic
evaluation of land based on proposed land uses.
Draft February 2013
0
CUP T
t
it
I +
--
I
I �
I
T �
I ♦
I �
i `� • I 1
I 1
• 1
1
i
•
f
• ♦ � � �
toed /�
4�
• Rd
l
`
• 1
• 1
1
® 1
1
•
1
� r
rS I'".g g Rd� ► 1
•
•
r
.r
r i
�1
a'F �
N� O >
.S
LL
1 f
rrl I � `Qd
8 j7 %-a/
or��ar
1
f �a
UNINCORPORATED SANTA CLARA C�
r•
-
a
f
7--
I
Legend
Earthquake Faults
Alquist Priolo Special Study Zone
i� Potential Primary
Surface Fault Rupture Zone
�- Saratoga City Limits
• Saratoga Sphere of Influence
Surrounding City Boundaries
SAFETY ELEMENT
N Fault Location Map and
CITY O F yp�E 0 750 1,500 3,000 Feet
S A RAT A s Earthquake Fault Zones
Prepared by RBF Consulting: 02/14/2013
tliiauc� Sources: City of Saratoga - Zoning (2010) Ground Movement Potential Map (2013) Exhibit 3
County of Santa Clara - CI Limits (2010) StreetEdge (2009) Fault Rupture Hazard Zones (2002)
ESRI Terrain Basemap
CIIY 0��W
SARATWA
Draft February 2013
This page was intentionally left blank
'�
C17Y OF
A R. A T if r ar�f1scd.
0 SAFETY ELEMENT
California has a long history of strong earthquakes that have affected communities in the
Saratoga area.$ The largest earthquake to occur within 10 miles of Saratoga was the 6.9 M
Loma Prieta Earthquake that occurred along the San Andreas Fault in 1989.9 Saratoga's close
proximity to the San Andreas Fault Zone and other potentially active faults suggests a high
probability that a strong earthquake will occur in the near future in the vicinity of the City.
Surface Rupture
Surface rupture, or a break in the ground's surface and the associated displacement caused by
the movement of a fault, is directly correlated to earthquake magnitude. Earthquakes having a
magnitude of 5.5 or greater are required for such events to occur. During the 1906 San
Francisco earthquake (magnitude 7.8), ground rupture occurred along 270 miles of the San
Andreas Fault, with a 20 -foot offset occurring near the epicenter in Marin County.
In response to the 1971 San Fernando Earthquake, the State of California enacted the Alquist-
Priolo Fault Zoning Act in 1972, which is intended to prevent the construction of habitable
structures on top of an active fault line. In conformance with this act, properties located within
an Alquist - Priolo Special Study Zone are required to identify the location of any active faults and
establish appropriate setbacks, if deemed necessary. In addition to regional investigations
necessary to the basic understanding of faults and their histories, detailed site investigations are
needed prior to the approval of construction in any suspected or potentially active fault zone.
Utilities, roads and other linear features are particularly vulnerable to damage resulting from
ground displacement. Little rural residential development has taken place within the San
Andreas Fault Zone in Saratoga's Sphere of Influence, so the present risk of structural damage
due to fault rupture is minimal. However, utility facilities such as gas and electric lines that may
traverse the fault zone may be subject to damage from surface rupture.
ii. Secondary Seismic Hazards
Ground Failure
Ground failure is a secondary effect of earthquake shaking that can be potentially dangerous
and damaging. Ground failure effects include landslides, rock falls, subsidence, liquefaction
8 USGS Database, http: // earthquake.usgs.gov/ earthquakes/ states /historical_ state.php #california, accessed October 30, 2012
9 USGS Database, http: / /earthquake.usgs.gov /earthquakes /states /events /1989_10_18.php, accessed October 30, 2012
Draft February 2013
Lnr pit
A RAT
SAFETY ELEMENT 7a
and ground lurching in areas not actually ruptured by a fault. All of these activities involve the
displacement of ground surface due to loss of strength or failure of the underlying materials
during earthquake shaking. Moisture content and groundwater levels play an important role in
the assessment of the potential for ground failure, as do soil type and slope instability.
The San Andreas Fault Zone and the hills to the northwest of the City are estimated to have a
high probability of landslide potential should an earthquake occur, while the likelihood of
subsidence and ground lurching in these areas is low.
The Bohlman Road area is known for unstable slopes and is considered to have a high potential
for seismically induced landslides.
The Santa Clara Valley floor, the most populated area of Saratoga, is relatively flat but is
traversed by several creeks. While this area may not experience landslide or ground lurching
during an earthquake, there is a moderate probability that subsidence and /or liquefaction could
take place due to the loosely compacted alluvial soil. Refer to Exhibit 4, Liquefaction Areas.
Structural Hazards Related to Seismic Activity
The majority of residential structures in the City of Saratoga are single -story wood framed
homes constructed post -1950. This construction tends to fare well during earthquakes because
of the flexibility of the building materials. While it is impossible to guarantee the safety of any
structure, a clearly defined and conscientious practice of structural reinforcement will greatly
reduce injury and loss of life. Establishing appropriate setbacks to prohibit development near or
on fault lines is another precaution to minimize structural damage.
Many commonly used building components, such as unreinforced stone or brick chimneys and
unreinforced masonry, are particularly susceptible to ground shaking. Among newly constructed
buildings, particularly those for commercial use, small steel frame buildings are generally
considered the safest, while unreinforced masonry and tilt -up structures are regarded as posing
a greater risk. Because Saratoga is predominantly a residential community, it does not have a
vast number of unreinforced masonry or tilt -up structures. At the present time, there are no tilt-
Draft February 2013
.E
116
CUP T
I
it i� _ • Imo-
— I +
I —
I � ♦' ti
� Imo- � � J��1• + •
� T r
I I 1
I ',, • I 1
• 1 �
•
41 r-
d.
1
1
1
1
1
1 J — 1
• 1
1 c
• 1
el w-
Congress Spring Rd. 1
(HWY 9)
• 0 �a t
�
1 - fora`
I.i
UNINCORPORATED SA CLARA
Gt J'
�a
gla Ln. ,a5o
a
•
Rd.
i r
t
IOIVTE'
N SAFETY ELEMENT
y� CITY OF w�E o Aso ,,soo 3,000 Feet Liquefaction Areas
S A RAT A Prepared by RBF Consulting: 12/04/2012
Sources: City of Saratoga - Zoning P& (2010) : County of Santa Clara - Cityl-imits (2010) StreetEdge (2009) Exhibit 4
Seismic Hazard Mapping D&th (2002) : ESRI Terrain Basemap
CIIY 0��W
SARATWA
Draft February 2013
This page was intentionally left blank
'�
SAFETY ELEMENT In
up structures in the City, and according to Saratoga's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, which is an
annex to the Santa Clara County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan; all existing unreinforced
masonry structures have been retrofitted.
Seismically Induced Flooding and Dam Failure
Should a dam fail during an earthquake, the released water could cause flooding downstream.
The resulting damage is dependent on the rate of water released and the volume of water in the
reservoir. Dam failure can either be caused by ground displacement along a fault trace, ground
shaking or overtopping of the dam by a large landslide splash wave.
The Lake Ranch reservoir located to the south of Saratoga's Sphere of Influence is the most
likely reservoir to be affected by seismic activity. Operated by the San Jose Water Company,
Lake Ranch reservoir is located in a saddle- shaped depression near the southern portion of
Sanborn Road and was created by the construction of a small earthen dam at each end. Both
dams are traversed by the San Andreas Fault and withstood the 1906 and 1989 earthquakes on
this fault. Current estimates indicate that if dam failure occurs during an earthquake, up to 105
million gallons of water could be released into Saratoga Creek. This volume of water is
expected to inundate the creek bed in a comparable manner to the flooding hazard from a 100
year flood.10 The southeasterly flow of the reservoir storage would impact areas outside of the
City's Sphere of Influence near the Santa Cruz County line, while the northeasterly flow would
flood areas along Quito Creek.
Other flooding hazards resulting from the secondary effects of seismic activity could occur if
landslides are activated and advance into creek beds. Along Big Basin Way, near the San Jose
Water Company's Saratoga filter plant, a landslide could conceivably block both the road and
Saratoga Creek during an earthquake. This area has experienced movement in the past, and
has required periodic maintenance and the construction of expensive drainage facilities at the
site. Refer to Exhibit 5, Dam Failure Inundation Areas.
10 Discussion of the 100 -year flood conditions within the City is provided in Section C. Flood Hazards and depicted on Exhibit 6,
FEMA Flood Zones.
Draft February 2013
93
Lnr pit
A RAT
SAFETY ELEMENT In
up structures in the City, and according to Saratoga's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, which is an
annex to the Santa Clara County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan; all existing unreinforced
masonry structures have been retrofitted.
Seismically Induced Flooding and Dam Failure
Should a dam fail during an earthquake, the released water could cause flooding downstream.
The resulting damage is dependent on the rate of water released and the volume of water in the
reservoir. Dam failure can either be caused by ground displacement along a fault trace, ground
shaking or overtopping of the dam by a large landslide splash wave.
The Lake Ranch reservoir located to the south of Saratoga's Sphere of Influence is the most
likely reservoir to be affected by seismic activity. Operated by the San Jose Water Company,
Lake Ranch reservoir is located in a saddle- shaped depression near the southern portion of
Sanborn Road and was created by the construction of a small earthen dam at each end. Both
dams are traversed by the San Andreas Fault and withstood the 1906 and 1989 earthquakes on
this fault. Current estimates indicate that if dam failure occurs during an earthquake, up to 105
million gallons of water could be released into Saratoga Creek. This volume of water is
expected to inundate the creek bed in a comparable manner to the flooding hazard from a 100
year flood.10 The southeasterly flow of the reservoir storage would impact areas outside of the
City's Sphere of Influence near the Santa Cruz County line, while the northeasterly flow would
flood areas along Quito Creek.
Other flooding hazards resulting from the secondary effects of seismic activity could occur if
landslides are activated and advance into creek beds. Along Big Basin Way, near the San Jose
Water Company's Saratoga filter plant, a landslide could conceivably block both the road and
Saratoga Creek during an earthquake. This area has experienced movement in the past, and
has required periodic maintenance and the construction of expensive drainage facilities at the
site. Refer to Exhibit 5, Dam Failure Inundation Areas.
10 Discussion of the 100 -year flood conditions within the City is provided in Section C. Flood Hazards and depicted on Exhibit 6,
FEMA Flood Zones.
Draft February 2013
93
Lnr pit
S A RAT
SAFETY ELEM
A ENT
Other Potential Hazards Related to Seismic Activity
Public and quasi - public facilities such as utility systems may be at risk from the secondary
effects of seismic activity. In the aftermath of a major earthquake, facilities of particular
importance, such as water tanks, pipelines including gas, water and sewer, electrical and
communications systems, and roads, bridges and freeways, are regarded as the "lifelines" of
the community for the provision of emergency services. Many of these utilities unavoidably
cross hazardous areas, and could be disrupted and seriously impaired in the event of an
earthquake. Water distribution, sewage disposal and gas systems are particularly vulnerable.
Disruption of these systems after an earthquake will be dependent not only upon the location
and magnitude of the earthquake and specific site conditions, but also on the condition of the
lines, pumps and plan facilities. Water pumps require electricity units to operate, so a system
could fail at multiple points. Pipelines and storage tanks containing flammable materials could
rupture igniting the contents and increasing fire hazards in parts of the City. The utilities that are
most likely to be disturbed in the City and its Sphere of Influence are in the San Andreas Fault
Zone and the Bohlman Road area.
Several safety measures have been used by the utility providers within the City to reduce the
risk of utility system or infrastructure breakdown during an earthquake. San Jose Water
Company provides back up power sources to critical facilities and pipelines that are degraded or
in disrepair on an annual basis are retrofitted or replaced through their Capital Improvements
Program." Water comes to Saratoga from infrastructure operated by San Jose Water
Company. Water sources include groundwater pumped from over 100 wells that draw water
from the Santa Clara Groundwater Basin, imported surface water provided by the Santa Clara
Valley Water District, and local mountain surface water from the Santa Cruz Mountains and
treated at San Jose Water Company's water treatment plants.12 While it is unlikely that all
sources would be shut off simultaneously, a limited reserve of replacement equipment might
delay the restoration of service. After an earthquake or disaster, San Jose Water Company
would implement its own emergency operating plan to serve Saratoga.
11 Personal communication, Jim Wollbrink, San Jose Water Company, November 29, 2012.
12 San Jose Water Company Website located online at http : / /www.sjwater.com /for your_ information /education_safety /water supply /,
accessed October 30, 2012
Draft February 2013
0
1 I CUP T
II
— I �
_ I
I
I I
I 1
I I ,
I � 1
I • I 1
I •I �� I 1
•
1
• r-
1�, ♦1 �a ,�'cL
G
r quo
Rd.
. 1
1
• 1
1
1
1
Congress Spring Re
(HWY 9) t
r
f r
1
i
• • • • •
/PJ6.
�a
gat -
'c
a
la i_K r(-�q
9
ai
m sl
LL
14- 10
f00
Rd• o� Rd. y
1 rl l o • �
I Y
• • • • "� • • • • • , I • .
f
•
: a
X
•- ...... - - d
� U
C
Jar
�i 11
1
,
Sobey Rd.
V
m
Q'
m
r
r
e'
_ 1
i �♦
i
MO TE
�
� i
Legend
UNINCORPORATED SANTA CLARA Lake Ranch Dam
Potential Inundation
Potential Street Impacts
Saratoga City Limits
Note: This potential inundation hazard data is an interpretation of the data provided byABAG and was created to Saratoga Sphere of Influence
include the areas in the region that were identified as potentially being inundated following a dam failure
event. This data has been generalized from maps dam owners are required to prepare and file with the Surrounding City Boundaries
California State Office of Emergency Services. There is no analysis associated with this data set that
estimates inundation depth.
N SAFETY ELEMENT
-da�c CITY OF q/ E 0 750 1,500 3,000 Feet
S A RAT A Dam Failure Inundation Areas
Prepared by RBF Consulting: 12/04/2012
s
Sources: City of Saratoga - Zoning IIAap (2010) : County of Santa Clara - CityLimits (2010) StreetEdge (2009) Exhibit 5
CaIEMA and DWR/DSOD . RI Terrain Basemap
CIIY 0��W
SARATWA
Draft February 2013
This page was intentionally left blank
'�
Lnr pit
A RAT
SAFETY ELEMENT -M
The problem of water supply and distribution in the hillsides and the Sphere of Influence could
become acute after an earthquake. In the summer, when streams are dry, dependence on
private sources might be inadequate for emergency needs. In addition, damage to roadways,
freeways and bridges can be expected during a major earthquake. However, recently
constructed reinforced concrete bridges and overpasses are considered to be more resilient to
earthquake movement than older bridges and overpasses. Several local bridges13 in the City
could be subject to failure during an earthquake if they were not constructed in accordance with
current seismic design parameters. Facilities in the City are also in areas of high groundwater
levels and unstable creek beds: Springer Avenue at Big Basin Way, Fourth Street near Big
Basin Way, Sarahills Road near Pierce Road, and Chalet Clothilde Drive near Pierce Road.
One of the most critical concerns following an earthquake is the provision of emergency care for
the injured at major hospitals and health care facilities. Some hospitals may not be operational
after a major earthquake, especially if they are located near the San Andreas Fault. Two
hospitals are located in the vicinity of Saratoga that could provide emergency care post disaster:
El Camino Hospital Los Gatos on Pollard Road in Los Gatos and Good Samaritan Hospital on
Samaritan Drive, located in San Jose. In the event that an earthquake causes the City to
become isolated from the rest of the Santa Clara Valley, hospitals in San Jose region may not
be available if roadways are damaged. Schools in the City would be used as Emergency
Shelters where mass care and feeding could occur. Additionally, emergency planning and
training efforts with the Saratoga Union School District, the Los Gatos - Saratoga Union High
School District, Blue Hills and McAuliffe Schools from the Cupertino Union School District,
Prospect High School, St. Andrews School, and Sacred Heart School are active and continuous
so that these entities will be prepared and self- sufficient during a disaster.
iii. Regulatory Framework
State Regulations
The Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act (California Public Resources Code, Chapter 7.5,
Section 2621- 2699.6) was passed in 1972 to mitigate the hazard of surface faulting to structures
for human occupancy. The Act only addresses the hazard of surface fault rupture and is not
directed toward other earthquake hazards, such as subsidence or liquefaction. The Act requires
73 Bridges within Saratoga include: Prospect Road/ Hwy 85, Cox Avenue/ Hwy 85, Saratoga Avenue/ Hwy 85, Quito Road/ Hwy 85,
Saratoga Creek/ Hwy 85, and the railroad crossing over Saratoga Avenue west of Hwy 85.
Draft February 2013
97
Lnr pit
A RAT
SAFETY ELEMENT —E
the State Geologist to establish regulatory zones, known as "Earthquake Fault Zones," around
the surface traces of active faults and to issue appropriate maps.
The Seismic Hazards Mapping Act (SHMA) of 1990 (California Public Resources Code, Chapter
7.8, Section 2690- 2699.6) provides a statewide seismic hazard mapping and technical advisory
program to assist cities and counties in fulfilling their responsibilities for protecting the public
health and safety from the effects of strong ground shaking, liquefaction, landslides, or other
ground failure, and other seismic hazards caused by earthquakes.
California building standards are published in the California Code of Regulations, Title 24,
known as the California Building Standards Code (CBSC). The CBSC applies to all applications
for residential building permits. The CBSC consists of 11 parts that contain administrative
regulations for the California Building Standards Commission and for all State agencies that
implement or enforce building standards. Local agencies must ensure that development
complies with the guidelines contained in the CBSC.
Local Regulations
The City has standards for development listed in Article 16 -15 of the City's Building code, which
incorporates the most recent California Building Code and enforces Title 24 California
Regulations.
C. FLOOD HAZARDS
Historically, periodic flooding has been a benefit to agricultural soil, wildlife and the general
ecological balance of a community. Flooding becomes a natural hazard when the flow of water
threatens life and damages personal property. Damages from flooding increase in proportion to
the growth of urban development and as subdivisions locate in areas prone to flooding.
Floods are primarily caused by excessive surface runoff resulting from intense or heavy rainfall
or from the failure of flood control or water supply structures, such as levees or reservoirs.
When prolonged rainfall exceeds the absorption rate of the soil or the waste storage capacity of
the watershed, the excess must flow downstream. Although it is impossible to prevent
excessive rainfall that causes major floods, it is possible to develop methods and policies for the
management of areas subject to flooding and for the protection of life and property. Through
Draft February 2013
C17Y OF
A R. A T if r ar�f1scd.
0 SAFETY ELEMENT
the use of hydrologic data in conjunction with regulatory and flood proofing measures, proper
land use planning can be effective in the control of flooding and its possible adverse effects.
i. Historical Data on Flooding in Saratoga
All surface water originating in or passing through Saratoga ultimately discharges into the San
Francisco Bay. Runoff is collected in the City's underground storm drainage system, which
discharges into the creeks throughout the City. Three major drainages are located within
Saratoga and all drain from south to north. From east to west, these creeks are the San Tomas
Aquino, Saratoga and Calabazas Creeks. Wildcat, Vasona and Sobey Creeks are tributaries
within the San Tomas Aquino Creek drainage system, while Prospect and Rodeo Creeks are
tributaries of Calabazas Creek. San Tomas Aquino and Calabazas Creeks discharge into the
Guadalupe Slough near the Bay, with Saratoga Creek joining San Tomas Aquino north of the
City.
Floodplain mapping prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
indicates that several areas throughout the City are located within the 100 -year floodplain.
Flooding in the early years was often viewed as an asset rather than a liability, since the need
for water to irrigate agricultural crops outweighed the damage done by floodwater. As urban
development has increased, damage became a more important consideration as population
growth and the completion of water retention facilities in the area combined to alter the pattern
of potential flooding.
The severity of floods in relation to urban development varies from year to year. Several
significant flooding events have occurred in Saratoga, dating back as far as 1914. The Santa
Clara Valley Water District has made progress in improving the channels as funds became
available. As a result, flood damage has been reduced over the years. During an average
year, residents of the area experience minor flooding events and most potential hazards are
now being proactively addressed through the development review process.
ii, Identification of Areas Subject to Flooding
Several creek areas in Saratoga have been identified as specific flood hazard areas, as shown
in Exhibit 6, FEMA Flood Zones. Saratoga Creek has the largest floodplain in width and length.
The widest portion of the floodplain is south of the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks. Wildcat,
Draft February 2013
C17Y OF
A R. A T if r ar�f1scd.
0 SAFETY ELEMENT
Vasona and San Tomas Aquino Creeks also are subject to the 100 -year flood hazards. Recent
improvements to these creek channels have greatly reduced the potential for flood damage in
adjacent areas.
Calabazas Creek's 100 -year floodplain within the City extends from Prospect Road to Wardell
Road, between Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road and Arroyo de Arguello, where the watershed
branches out in a westward direction. Although much of the terrain lying within the upper
Calabazas Creek watershed is characterized by steep hillsides, heavy rainfall during past years
has saturated unstable slopes and caused the groundwater level to rise, triggering landslides of
mud and debris into the creek channels. To address many of these flooding issues, the Santa
Clara Valley Water District has initiated the Calabazas Creek Flood Protection Project, which
proposes the construction of a detention basin adjacent to the creek, the modification of the
culvert beneath Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road, and replacement of the Union Pacific Railroad
bridge over the creek. These improvements are intended to provide 100 -year flood protection
within the Calabazas Creek watershed.
X. Flood Control and Land Development Review
The flood hazard areas of the City are subject to periodic inundation, which can result in loss of
life and property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental
services, extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, and impairment of the
tax base., These flood losses are caused by uses that are inadequately elevated, flood proofed,
or protected from flood damage. The cumulative effect of obstructions in areas of special flood
hazards that increase flood heights and velocities also contribute to the flood loss. In response
to this, the City has implemented a Floodplain Management Plan, which is codified under City
Code Article 16 -66.
The floodplain management plan includes methods and provisions to control the alteration of
natural floodplains, stream channels, and protective barriers; to control filling, grading, dredging
and other development that can increase flood damage; to regulate the construction of flood
barriers which can divert flood waters or increase flood hazards in other areas; and to require
that uses vulnerable to floods be protected against flood damage at the time of their
construction. One of the provisions of this plan requires a development permit be obtained prior
to construction or development begins. Additionally, certain construction standards, such as
Draft February 2013
100
\\li
CU
� r �
tl
spect R- ,
i
. tltl�
• e
� Qe
1
Congress Spring Rd. t
(HWY 9)
• • • •
Gte l
1
°
.3
—' Sobey Rd.
LL
i
<0
4,
s c a ar
° -
�d Rd.
o8 °�\�ar
MO TI
Legend
UNINCORPORATED SANTA CLARA
100 Year Floodplain (A& AE)
0 500 Year Floodplain
Saratoga City Limits
�f I Saratoga Sphere of Influence
Surrounding City Boundaries
z
N SAFETY ELEMENT
x t:Cl ACITRY OF T A w +r o 7W 1,10 3,000 Feet FEMA Flood Zones
`' y l y_ y l 1 f�� 1 Prepared by RBF Consulting: 12/04/2012
c Sources: City of Saratoga - Zoning 1 010) : County of Santa Clara - Cityl-imits (2010) StreetEdge (2009) Exhibit 6
FEMA- DFIRM (2009) : ES rrain Basemap
CIIY 0��W
SARATWA
Draft February 2013
This page was intentionally left blank
'�
CITY Ot'W
SARATWA SAFETY ELEMENT
anchoring, building with flood resistant materials, and elevating and flood proofing, are required
within an area of special flood hazard. The plan requires new and replacement water and
sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize flood water infiltration and discharge
into flood waters. Standards are also included for subdivisions and manufactured homes. 14
iv. Flood Control and Emergency Services
The City of Saratoga has participated in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) since
1973. As part of the City's implementation of their NFIP requirements, City Code Article 16 -66,
Flood Plain Management was adopted by the City Council in 1996 via Ordinance No. 71 -167.
The City of Saratoga utilizes digital flood insurance rate maps, flood insurance studies, and
other studies supplied by applicants when developing properties located in flood hazard areas
to regulate development in flood hazard areas. The City has no repetitive flood loss properties.
v. Regulatory Framework
Federal Reaulations
FEMA performs the following functions:
• Advises on building codes and flood plain management;
• Teaches people how to get through a disaster;
• Helps equip and prepare local and state emergency managers;
• Coordinates the federal response to a disaster;
• Makes disaster assistance available to states, communities, businesses and individuals;
• Trains emergency managers;
• Supports the nation's fire service; and
• Administers the national flood and crime insurance programs
The Flood Plain Management Act (Cobey- Alquist Act of 1969) introduced the concept of
reserving areas along stream channels from future development for flood prevention projects.
At the city level, Saratoga has an extensive review procedure in conjunction with the County of
Santa Clara that addresses flooding potential and the impact on development.
14 Santa Clara County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, Saratoga Annex, page 21 -28
Draft February 2013
103
Lnr pit
A RAT
SAFETY ELEMENT 1
Local Regulations
In addition, Article 16 -66 of the City's Municipal Code governs floodplain management. All
development that could be affected by seasonal flooding is subject to the regulations and
standards of Article 16 -66 to mitigate flood - related losses or damage to the fullest extent
feasible.
D. FIRE HAZARDS
Most fires are started by people, either intentionally or through carelessness. The places of
greatest concern for fire prevention are where people live, recreate, drive or work. Once ignited,
a fire can quickly blaze out of control when weather and physical site conditions are amenable.
In addition to the direct hazards to people and property, indirect damages and economic losses
may also occur, such as erosion and siltation of dams and flood control channels, increased
flood hazards, damage to watersheds, increased potential for mud slides, and losses to scenic
and recreational values.
Development in areas of fire hazard should be guided by prevention requirements, such as fire
resistant building construction and materials, adequate space between structures, available
water supply, fire resistant plant materials, quality of year -round firefighting service, available
evacuation routes, access routes level enough for fire equipment use, and creation and
maintenance of fire breaks in brush areas.
Access is a key component of fire hazard prevention; fire - fighting equipment must be able to
reach fires and residents and visitors must be able to evacuate during a fire. Private roads,
particularly in hillside areas, are less likely to meet access and maintenance standards required
for public roads. The most effective method for avoiding fire risk in hazardous areas is the
regulation of housing development and the provision of alternate access routes for developed
areas. Unmaintained county roads may fail to meet City road construction standards and may
not provide adequate or alternative means of access.
Although fire protection services in the City and the Sphere of Influence are considered
adequate for most emergencies, they may prove inadequate in the event of an earthquake.
Fires associated with an earthquake are often scattered and spread rapidly due to an impaired
water system. In such cases, Saratoga's current level of fire services could be insufficient and
Draft February 2013
104
Me-
CITY Ot'W
SARATWA
0 SAFETY ELEMENT
water could be unavailable if reservoirs are ruptured or streams are obstructed. During minor
emergencies, fire stations within the vicinity of the City could provide assistance, but major
emergencies, such as large -scale fires, would require mutual aid from surrounding Counties,
State, and Federal Agencies.
J . Fire Protection in Saratogaf5
Santa Clara County Fire Department
The Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District a.k.a. Santa Clara County Fire
Department (herein referred to as "SCCFD" or "County Fire ") is a county- dependent special
district providing fire suppression, basic and advanced rescue, advanced life support first
response medical services, hazardous materials and technical rescue response, fire inspection,
fire investigation, disaster preparedness, and public education.16
The Department is divided into five service divisions: Administrative Services, Fire Prevention
Division, Operations Division, Training Division, and Support Services Division. The Fire
Department personnel serve the territory from 17 fire stations.17
The City of Saratoga is served by four fire stations, which include:
Saratoga Fire Station
Quito Fire Station
14380 Saratoga Av
18870 Saratoga /Los Gatos Rd
Saratoga, CA 95070
Los Gatos, CA 95030
West Valley Fire Station
Seven Springs Fire Station
19800 Cox Av
21000 Seven Springs Pkwy
Saratoga, CA 95070
Cupertino, CA 95014
Saratoga Fire Protection District
In addition to the Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District, the City of Saratoga is also
served by the Saratoga Fire Protection District. This special district was established in 1923
75 Santa Clara County Fire Department Website, online at http: / /www.sccfd.org /suppression.html, accessed October 30, 2012
76 Santa Clara County Fire Department, Strategic Plan, January 2010 - December 2014.
17 Santa Clara County Fire Department, Business Plan, January 2010- December 2014.
Draft February 2013
105
Lnr pit
A RAT SAFETY !
and provides oversight and administration of the City's Early Warning Fire Alarm System, aimed
at reducing fire response times. The district is co- located with the Santa Clara County Fire
Department in the Saratoga Fire Station.
ii. Assessment of Fire Riskin Wi /d /and Areas
Saratoga is susceptible to wildland fires due to the steep topography, abundant fuel load, and
climatic conditions, particularly along the western and southwestern edges of the City. The
areas most susceptible to fire hazard are located west of Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road and
southwest of Saratoga -Los Gatos Road (Highway 9). Based on the Fire Hazard Severity Zone
mapping prepared by Cal FIRE, this portion of the City is identified within Very High, High, and
Moderate Fire Hazard Zones.18 As a result of this condition, the City (in coordination with CAL
FIRE) has established a Wildland -Urban Interface zone, which covers a majority of the areas
within the City that have moderate to very high fire hazard potential. Most of these areas are
located in the southern and western portions of the City, as depicted in Exhibit 7, Fire Hazard
Zones. As a result of this potential hazard, special fire protection measures and planning are
necessary within these areas of the City before development occurs.
The hillside areas of the City are characterized by native brush, grasslands and trees which are
prone to wildfire. While the low density of housing in these areas minimizes the potential
danger to humans and structures, there is a danger that fire in one structure will start a wildfire
which could consume significant areas of the City.
The Santa Clara County FireSafe Council encourages a defensible space around residences to
protect homes while providing a safe area for firefighters. This defensible space is typically split
into a "Lean, Clean, and Green" Zone (low lying irrigated landscaping), and a "Reduced Fuel
Zone" (natural vegetation thinned to reduce fuel load). The same requirements (as well as
additional development regulations) are reinforced by the Uniform Fire Code for wildland -urban
interface areas.
Access and parking for emergency vehicles and delays in response time are the major public
safety concerns in this area. All fire apparatus access roads are required to have a pavement
18 City of Saratoga Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2012
Draft February 2013
106
N SAFETY ELEMENT
CITY OF we o Aso tsoo 3,000Feet Fire Hazard Zones
SA RATA A 5
Prepared by RBF Consulting: 12/04/2012
Sources: City of Saratoga - Zoning Mai �Q�) Wildland -Urban Interface Fire Area Map (2009) : ESRI Terrain Basemap Exhibit 7
County of Santa Clara - City LitnTfs'(2010) StreetEdge (2009) :CA Dept of Forestry and Fire Protection (2007)
I
(-
SANJOSE
a
t ,
.
w
-t
•
Prospect Rd.
. � � c
' 3
I
� `
A
>
I
L
_y
I n
Cox Ave.
I •
I • \
• 1 N
rX
X
—1
1
• 1
\e
C� ms
'o
OHO •3
•,
fA .
SO^ C!
♦
c
• end
��
SARATOGA
Q`et�
•
Fa
rn
e
Allendale Ave.
1
ry
• x ��� ,
e •
apJ
,Q,•
• v •x
X 4
Sobey Rd.
'
•a�
i
atatio�
5 Douglas Ln.
y�etP
Gre
1
� ti
f •�N
may
Bt9
ai
Q
®
m
Congress Spring Rd.
dip
LOS
(HWY 9)
0
9d
GATOS
•
fX� X
+�`�
� sC C
- - - -
°c �a
d ♦o
S'Pp
Rd.
.•
�� �o�\�ar /y
ea�o
K
s
IK.V
•
r
r
UNINC PORATED SANTA CLARA COUNTY „ ' • •
Legend
Very High
Fire Station
High
�_ _ Saratoga City Limits
Moderate
Saratoga Sphere of Influence
® Wildland -Urban Interface
- Surrounding City Boundaries
N SAFETY ELEMENT
CITY OF we o Aso tsoo 3,000Feet Fire Hazard Zones
SA RATA A 5
Prepared by RBF Consulting: 12/04/2012
Sources: City of Saratoga - Zoning Mai �Q�) Wildland -Urban Interface Fire Area Map (2009) : ESRI Terrain Basemap Exhibit 7
County of Santa Clara - City LitnTfs'(2010) StreetEdge (2009) :CA Dept of Forestry and Fire Protection (2007)
CIIY 0��W
SARATWA
Draft February 2013
This page was intentionally left blank
to "
Lnr pit
A RAT
SAFETY ELEMENT —0
width of 20 feet. Buildings within the City's wildland -urban interface require fire access.
Driveways in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with turnarounds and driveways in
excess of 200 feet in length and less than 20 feet in width shall be provided with turnouts in
addition to turnarounds.
Given the wildland -urban interface condition within the City, the Santa Clara County Fire
Department trains and equips their personnel to provide structure protection and limited initial
attack on wildland incidents. The goal is to prevent a fire in wildland space from expanding into
other high fire hazards areas. The fire hazard in Saratoga's Sphere of Influence outside the City
limits is considerably higher than in the City and its incorporated hillsides. The major problems
contributing to adverse firefighting conditions in the Sphere of Influence include: areas of steep
slope, lack of adequate water supply, and intense vegetative cover. Mutual Aid Agreements
with other fire jurisdictions are in place to provide as- needed assistance and coverage for fire
emergencies within Saratoga and its surrounding environs.
Saratoga Fire Protection District Early Warning Fire Alarm System
The Saratoga Fire Protection District is responsible for providing fire awareness information and
administering the Early Warning Fire Alarm System for Saratoga residents. Residents who
install fire systems and subscribe to the service can quickly notify fire personnel of any fires.
This keeps response times low and allows firefighters to suppress fire emergency situations
quickly.
New single - family residences constructed within the City are generally larger than the older
existing homes (typically in excess of 5,000 square feet). Because of the size of these newer
dwellings, a fire may be more difficult to extinguish and, therefore, could potentially cause more
damage than would normally occur. As a result, Saratoga requires that all new construction
include an automatic fire sprinkler system, and Early Warning Fire Systems be installed in the
following situations:
• All new single - family dwellings, commercial structures and community facilities located
within the Wildland -Urban Interface Area.
• Any existing single - family dwelling, commercial structure or community facility which is
expanded by fifty percent or more in floor area and is located within the Wildland -Urban
Interface Area.
Draft February 2013
109
CITY Ot'W
SARATW&
SAFETY ELEMENT
• All new single - family dwellings, commercial structures and community facilities having a
floor area in excess of five thousand square feet.
• Any existing single - family dwelling, commercial structure or community facility that is
expanded by fifty percent or more in floor area which, after such expansion, will exceed
five thousand square feet in floor area.
• All new multi - family dwellings and other new structures having multiple sleeping units
including, but not limited to, hotels, motels, apartments, condominiums or other
community housing projects, townhouses and nursing homes.
• Any existing multi - family dwelling or other structure having multiple sleeping units that
are expanded by fifty percent or more in floor area.
In the event of an urban fire, ladder trucks and response engines from the Santa Clara County
Fire Department are the designated responders on all first and second alarms within urban
areas.
Assessment of Fire Risk in Urban Areas
Fire hazards in the flat, urbanized areas of Saratoga are relatively low. Although these areas
are higher in population density than the hillside areas, excessive amounts of combustible
vegetation is not present. The City's Fire Code and trash pickup service have contributed to
removing a large portion of combustible vegetation and trash in the City's urban area.
Response time for fire protection services are only a few minutes to any of the City's more
densely populated neighborhoods, and the peak load water supply requirement of 1,000 gallons
of water per minute for two hours is more than adequate for these areas.
The summer fire season poses the greatest threat to residential areas in the City, particularly
during periods of high temperatures accompanied by extremely dry vegetation. Residences
with wood shake shingle roofs are especially susceptible to fire. Their vulnerability increases
dramatically during periods of drought and high winds and become a major concern to the fire
personnel. The future adoption of standards for fire retardant roof materials and residential
sprinklers for all areas of the City should be considered.
Draft February 2013
110
CITY Ot'w
SARATWA
iii. Regulatory Framework —Fire Protection
SAFETY ELEMENT
State Regulations
The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) is dedicated to the fire
protection and stewardship of over 31 million acres of California's privately -owned wildland.
Santa Clara County Regulations
The Santa Clara County Fire Department has multiple publications and pamphlets to educate
residents on the dangers of wild and urban fire, how to defend against a fire, and how to
eliminate hazards that could prove costly in the event of a fire. This information is readily
available to residents, businesses, and interested stakeholders within Saratoga and surrounding
communities.
City of Saratoga Regulations
Chapter 16 of the Saratoga Municipal Code includes the most recently adopted State codes
(Building Code, Fire Code, Residential Building Code, etc.) associated with fire regulations that
affect development within the City. The requirements include the installation of Early Warning
Fire Alarm Systems and fire sprinkler systems.
Chapter 14 of Saratoga's Municipal Code (Subdivision Ordinance) requires a peak load water
supply of 1,000 gallons of water per minute for two hours for all housing developments. All new
developments are expected to meet this requirement and would not receive development
approval until adequate infrastructure is in place to support the proposed use.
iv. Hazardous Materials Storage and Disposal
The Santa Clara County Department of Public Health administers the Hazardous Materials
Program for the County. The Hazardous Materials Program is part of the Hazardous Materials
Compliance Division (HMCD) within Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health.
HMCD is the Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for all areas of Santa Clara County
other than the cities of Santa Clara, Gilroy, and Sunnyvale. HMCD provides comprehensive
environmental regulatory compliance inspection services to protect human health and the
environment. Additionally, program personnel perform plan reviews and inspections associated
Draft February 2013
111
C17Y OF
A R. A T if r ar�f1scd.
0 SAFETY ELEMENT I
with the construction, upgrading, and closure of hazardous materials storage facilities and
equipment.19
Saratoga does not have an identified problem with hazardous materials storage and handling.
No major chemical handlers are located in the City. Storage, use and disposal of hazardous
materials is typically limited to automotive service stations located in the City and normally
consists of anti - freeze, brake fluid, motor oil, and gasoline.
The Santa Clara County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan indicates that hazardous materials spills
are not of particular concern to the City of Saratoga. Generally, hazardous materials are
transported through the City rather than to a location within the City limits for storage or use.
The main transportation routes for these materials are Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road, State Route 9
and State Route 85. If a hazardous chemical spill occurs, surface and groundwater
contamination is possible. Floodplains and creeks lie in close proximity to the primary
transportation routes and can become contaminated quickly between the time a spill occurs and
the clean -up process begins. Any spills that may occur within the City would be responded to
by the Santa Clara County Fire Department with the clean -up operation being the responsibility
of the County of Santa Clara and the State of California.
v. Regulatory Framework — Hazardous Materials
Federal and State Regulations
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), enacted in 1976, is the principal
Federal law in the United States governing the disposal of solid waste and hazardous waste.
The responsibility for implementation of the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) was given to California EPA's Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) in
August 1992. The DTSC is also responsible for implementing and enforcing California's own
hazardous waste laws, which are known collectively as the Hazardous Waste Control Law.
In addition to the U.S. EPA and the DTSC, the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB),
San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2), is the enforcing agency for the protection and restoration
19 Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health Website, located online at
http: / /www.unidocs.org/ members /Santa_ Clara_ County_CUPA.html, accessed October 30, 2012
Draft February 2013
112
C17Y OF
A R. A T if r ar�f1scd.
0 SAFETY ELEMENT I
of water resources, including remediation of unauthorized releases of hazardous substances in
soil and groundwater.
The California Accidental Release Prevention Program Law (Cal ARP Program) (California
Health and Safety Code Section 25531 - 25543.3) provides for consistency with Federal laws
(i.e., the Emergency Preparedness and Community Right -to -Know Act and the Clean Air Act)
regarding accidental chemical releases and allows local oversight of both the State and Federal
programs.
Transportation of hazardous materials /waste is regulated by California Code of Regulations
(CCR) Title 26, Toxics. The Federal Department of Transportation (DOT) is the primary
regulatory authority for the interstate transport of hazardous materials. The DOT establishes
regulations for safe handling procedures (i.e., packaging, marking, labeling and routing). The
California Highway Patrol and the California Department of Transportation enforce Federal and
State regulations and respond to hazardous materials transportation emergencies.
Occupational safety standards exist to minimize worker safety risks from both physical and
chemical hazards in the workplace. The California Division of Occupational Safety and Health
is responsible for developing and enforcing workplace safety standards and assuring worker
safety in the handling and use of hazardous materials.
The "Unified Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials Management Regulatory Program"
(Program) was created in 1993 by California State Senate Bill 1082 to consolidate, coordinate,
and make consistent the administrative requirements, permits, inspections, and enforcement
activities for environmental and emergency management programs. The Program is
implemented at the local government level by Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPA).
Under the authority granted by the state, the Santa Clara County Hazardous Materials
Compliance Division administers the following programs and implements the following
regulations:
• Hazardous Waste Generator Program (California Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.5)
• Hazardous Waste Tiered Permitting (California Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.5)
Draft February 2013
113
C17Y OF
SA R. A T i� r arm :1scd.
0 SAFETY ELEMENT
• Underground Storage Tank (California Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.7)
• Aboveground Storage Tank SPCC Plan (California Health and Safety Code Chapter
6.67)
• Hazardous Materials Business Plans (California Health and Safety Code Chapter 6.95)
• California Accidental Release Prevention Program (California Health and Safety Code
Chapter 6.95)
The HMCD is also responsible for the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Oversight program,
which manages the cleanup of areas contaminated by UST releases. The County's Hazardous
Materials Program also implements the Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance (County
Ordinance No. NS- 517.31) and the Toxic Gas Ordinance (County Ordinance No. NS- 517.44).
Local Regulations
Chapter 8 of the Saratoga Municipal Code regulates hazardous materials within the City. The
purpose of Chapter 8 is to protect the health, life, resources, and property through the
prevention and control of unauthorized discharges of hazardous materials. The City delegates
its authority over the regulation of Hazardous Materials to the County of Santa Clara.
E. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND DISASTER PLANNING
Effective safety planning involves the development of regulations to prevent and /or mitigate
hazards and the preparation of plans to respond to emergencies. While prevention and
mitigation are the most effective and prudent methods to protect the public and property from
imminent danger, the City must be prepared when disasters occur. The City has prepared an
Emergency Operations Plan (maintained and administered by the Santa Clara County Fire
Department), which is reviewed and updated every year. Updating the plan on schedule
maintains the City's eligibility for FEMA funded programs.
The Saratoga Municipal Code asserts the obligation of the City to protect the life and property of
Saratoga residents, and supports the policy of mutual aid and coordination with Santa Clara
County. City expenditures are authorized for the protection and benefit of residents and their
property. Furthermore, the City of Saratoga Emergency Operations Plan has been prepared to
establish both proactive and reactive measures in the event of a declared emergency.
Draft February 2013
114
CITY Ot'W
SARATWA
J . Emergency Operations Plan Purpose and Organization
SAFETY ELEMENT
The purpose of Saratoga's Emergency Operations Plan is to create a framework for Saratoga
response personnel who will make the continual planning process both very clear and relatively
easy while identifying the hazards that exist in Saratoga. The Emergency Operations Plan also
enhances the development of Local Hazard Mitigation Planning on an ongoing basis and
addresses the needs of all people located in Saratoga. The primary hazards identified in the
Emergency Operations Plan are included in Table 1 - Hazard Analysis Likelihood of
Occurrence, below, according to their likelihood and severity:
Table 1
Hazard Analysis Likelihood of
Occurrence
Likelihood
Severity
Hazard
Infrequent
Sometimes
Frequent
Low
Moderate
High
Aviation Disaster
X
X
X
X
Civil Disturbance
X
Earthquake M <5
X
X
Earthquake M >5
X
X
X
Extreme Weather /Storm
X
X
X
Floods
X
X
X
Landslides
X
X
X
HAZMAT
X
X
Heat Wave
X
X
X
Public Health Emergency
X
X
X
X
Terrorism
X
X
X
X
Transportation-Highway
X
X
Wildfire /Forest Fire
X
X
Source: Saratoga Emergency Operations Plan, 2009
The Emergency Operations Plan is organized into eight sections:
I. Introduction
II. Hazard Assessment
III. Prevention /Mitigation
IV. Preparedness
V. Response
VI. Recovery
VII. Appendices
Potential emergency situations are assessed and mitigation measures for those situations are
discussed in the various sections of the Emergency Operations Plan. Hazard - Specific Actions
are included to prevent potential hazardous situations and lessen the impacts of hazards should
Draft February 2013
115
Lnr pit
A RAT
SAFETY ELEMENT _E
an emergency situation occur. For example, an earthquake is identified as a hazard.
Earthquakes are impossible to prevent, but mitigation measures to lessen the impact of
earthquakes can be implemented in advance of an earthquake, such as inspecting all structures
for weaknesses and providing emergency preparedness training to City employees and
volunteer responders. Applicable preventative measures are also listed for wildfire, flood,
weather, public health, hazardous materials, and terrorism emergency situations. The
Emergency Operations Plan includes measures that can be taken to prepare the community for
emergencies, such as training, public awareness, records protection, adherence to various
programs and policies (such as weed and brush abatement or adherence to setbacks from flood
zones), appointing field personnel, cross - jurisdictional preparedness, and maintaining relations
and communication with neighboring, State, and Federal Agencies. In the event of a disaster,
the plan contains response checklists and detailed responsibilities for emergency personnel to
follow depending on the level of the emergency or disaster situation. Recovery techniques and
protocols are also discussed in the Emergency Operations Plan to restore all systems back to
normal working order following a disaster or emergency.
ii. Emergency Evacuation Plan
An important emergency preparedness function within the City is the development of evacuation
plans which readily and effectively relocate residents from hazardous areas to safer locations.
An integral part of evacuation planning is the identification of evacuation routes and shelter
spaces. Exhibit 8, Evacuation Routes, illustrates the routes of movement on local collector and
arterial streets and the designated evacuation routes that should be followed in order to promote
safe and efficient evacuation of residents out of the City. A secondary evacuation route has
been identified along Sarahills Drive and Verde Vista Lane, which would be necessary if
evacuation along Pierce Road becomes difficult or requires re- routing.
This map shows that the majority of the City's evacuation routes are located in the area
between Prospect Avenue and Saratoga -Los Gatos Road, and Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road and
Quito Road, where the population is of a higher density than in the hillside areas. Depending on
the nature of the disaster, some access roads in the hillside areas may be closed or impeded,
creating the necessity for residents to evacuate from the area along substandard emergency
access roads or by helicopter.
Draft February 2013
116
I Ct
I
\
_! a
I I
I
I
I I
I
I je�9'P
I Ol 1
I i 1
• I 1
I •I �. I 1
I�
• 1
• 1 w r
� w ,
Iw, ♦ ♦1
sh �
♦ r
•
•
1
• 1
•
• 1
Congress Spring
(HWY 9)
11 i
a
i p'C�'
d.
�•
� 1 goh ar a�o�
1
1 �
1 � �
\ UNINCORPORATED SANTA IC
Q
1?1
Rd.
_w
N SAFETY ELEMENT
e CITY OF ��E 0 �e0 ,so0 3,000 Feet Evacuation Routes
7iFS A R A T
Prepared by RBF Consulting: 02/11/2013
Sources: City of Saratoga - Zoning 4ap J2010) : County of Santa Clara - Cityl-imits (2010) StreetEdge (2009) Exhibit 8
ESRI Terrain Basemap II
• •
\ MO TE
\ SERE
Legend
Evacuation Routes
OB
Bridge
Saratoga City Limits
•
Saratoga Sphere of Influence
_
Surrounding City Boundaries
..
Dead End
N SAFETY ELEMENT
e CITY OF ��E 0 �e0 ,so0 3,000 Feet Evacuation Routes
7iFS A R A T
Prepared by RBF Consulting: 02/11/2013
Sources: City of Saratoga - Zoning 4ap J2010) : County of Santa Clara - Cityl-imits (2010) StreetEdge (2009) Exhibit 8
ESRI Terrain Basemap II
CIIY 0��W
SARATWA
Draft February 2013
This page was intentionally left blank
118
to M
oily OF
SA R. A T i� r arm :1scd.
0 SAFETY ELEMENT
It is important to know the locations of places of assembly that can accommodate significant
numbers of people. The American Red Cross establishes facility agreements with schools,
churches, recreation halls and large facilities in order to take in evacuees and provide mass
care, feeding, and sheltering. It also provides casework services for those who have suffered
losses, and physical and mental health services for the victims of disasters.
Anticipated Red Cross emergency locations within Saratoga (shaded) and surrounding
communities are listed in Table 2 — American Red Cross Shelters, below. In the event of a major
disaster or emergency, if deemed safe for public use, these facilities would house residents as
"primary places of assembly." Following an earthquake, all facilities will be inspected prior to
being designated as a shelter or gathering location. However, it should be noted that after an
emergency/ disaster event other facilities within Saratoga and surrounding areas may offer
evacuation shelter services outside of those listed in Table 2.
Table 2
American Red Cross Shelters
Facility
Address
City
Zip Code
Prospect High School
18900 Prospect Avenue
Saratoga
95070
Redwood Middle School
13925 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga
95070
Saratoga Community Center
19655 Allendale Avenue
Saratoga
95070
Saratoga High School
20300 Herriman Avenue
Saratoga
95070
West Valley College
14000 Fruitvale
Saratoga
95070
Southwest YMCA
13500 Quito Road
San Jose
95070
Campbell Middle School
295 Cherry Lane
Campbell
95008
Westmont High School
4805 Westmont Avenue
Campbell
95008
Cupertino High School
10100 Finch Avenue
Cupertino
95014
De Anza College
21250 Stevens Creek Boulevard
Cupertino
95014
Homestead High School
21370 Homestead Road
Cupertino
95014
Hyde Middle School
19325 Bollinger Avenue
Cupertino
95014
Kennedy Middle School
821 Bubb Road
Cupertino
95014
Monte Vista High School
21840 McClellan Road
Cupertino
95014
Quinlan Community Center
10185 N. Stelling Road
Cupertino
95014
Calvary Baptist Church
16330 Los Gatos Boulevard
Los Gatos
95032
Lakeside Elementary School
19621 Black Road
Los Gatos
95033
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-
Day Saints
15955 Rose Avenue
Los Gatos
95030
Loma Prieta Community Center
23800 Summit Road
Los Gatos
95033
Loma Prieta School
23800 Summit Road
Los Gatos
95033
Los Gatos High School
20 High School Court
Los Gatos
95030
R.J. Fisher Middle School
19195 Fisher Avenue
Los Gatos
95032
Rolling Hills Middle School
1585 More Avenue
Los Gatos
95032
Source: Saratoga Emergency Operations Plan, 2009
Draft February 2013
119
C17Y OF
A R. A T if r ar�f1scd.
iii. Regulatory Framework
SAFETY ELEMENT
State Regulations
Through the California Emergency Services Act of 1970, the California Office of Emergency
Service provides the basis for local emergency preparedness. The Office of Emergency
Services is responsible for preparing the California State Emergency Plan and for coordinating
and supporting emergency services conducted by local governments. The responsibility for
immediate response to an emergency, such as fires, landslides, earthquakes or riots, rests with
local government agencies and segments of the private sector, with support services provided
by other jurisdictions and /or State and Federal agencies. In accordance with their normal
operating procedures, the initial response to an emergency will be made by local Fire, Law
Enforcement, Medical or Maintenance (Public Works) districts or departments.
Local Regulations
The City of Saratoga implements its Emergency Operations Plan, which provides an overview of
prevention and operational concepts, identifies components of the City's emergency
management organization within the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS)
and by extension, the National Incident Management System (NIMS) and describes the overall
responsibilities of the federal, state and county entities and the City for protecting life and
property and assuring the overall wellbeing of the population.
III. GOALS, POLICIES AND IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS
A. CONTEXT FOR SAFETY ELEMENT POLICY
The development of policies within the Safety Element is based upon a broad understanding of
the issues and hazards that affect the City of Saratoga. The City prides itself on its ability to
provide a high level of service to its residents and collaborates with County Agencies in
community education and outreach to create a safer environment. The following provides the
policy context for developing the goals, policies, and implementation measures for the City of
Saratoga Safety Element:
Draft February 2013
120
C11Y OF
SA R. A T i� r arm :1scd.
i. Land Instability Hazards
Given the close proximity to several active and potentially active faults and the steep
topographic relief within the western and southern portions of the City, site - specific geologic
review is necessary to evaluate geologic and seismic hazards that may affect developments
within particular areas of the City. Many areas of the City are susceptible to unstable land
conditions either from earthquake faults, steep topography, poor soil conditions, or any
combination thereof. In response to this, the City requires geotechnical engineering reports for
development within areas known for geologic or seismic hazards. In addition, issuance of
grading permits for hillside development areas and critical uses such as hospitals and utilities
require additional study and evaluation to further ensure public safety. The City may preclude
development within hazard areas through the use of open space land use designations, where
necessary.
ii. Flood Hazards
The City of Saratoga has three major drainages that traverse through the City, draining from
south to north and ultimately emptying into the San Francisco Bay. These creeks are the San
Tomas Aquino, Saratoga and Calabazas Creeks. In addition to these creeks, several smaller
creeks tributary to the San Tomas Aquino and Calabazas creeks are also located within the
City. These three drainages and several of their tributaries are located within the FEMA 100 -
year floodplain, which could impact properties adjacent to these drainages during a significant
flooding event. In addition, the entire City is also located within the FEMA 500 -year floodplain.
Along with flooding associated with weather related events, Saratoga Creek is also susceptible
to flooding by dam inundation in association with the failure of Lake Ranch Reservoir located
outside of the City's Sphere of Influence. Inundation is anticipated to stay within the Saratoga
creek bed; however, several roadways that cross this drainage could be impacted by flood
waters.
As a participant in FEMA's National Flood Insurance Program, the City has adopted a
Floodplain Management Ordinance. Through this ordinance, General Plan policies and other
regulations during the City's development review process, all new developments are required to
mitigate potential flooding impacts. This, in conjunction with potential flood control
improvements made by the City, will ensure that future impacts are reduced or minimized.
Draft February 2013
121
Lnr pit
A RAT
Furthermore, the City will work closely with the Santa Clara County Development Services office
to implement regional improvements that benefit Saratoga as well as surrounding areas by
improving regional flooding and drainage impacts.
iii. Fire Hazards
The City is currently served by the Santa Clara County Fire Department and Saratoga Fire
Protection District. The major fire concern for the City is the proximity of existing developments
to high fire hazard areas within the southern and western portions of the City. Effective
management of these areas and implementation of proper development controls that reduce
risk to fire hazards (wildland -urban interface [WUI] area) is an important component of this
Element.
Working closely with the Fire Department, the City of Saratoga can emphasize the need for
adequate training of firefighting personnel to address the changing needs of the community. As
part of this effort, it will also be very important that the residents and businesses within the
community understand their role in fire prevention and impact reduction activities that could
save lives.
Preventive measures will continue to be an important part of fire protection in Saratoga,
including conditions of development, fuel modification, and weed abatement activities/
landscaping maintenance to deter the spread of wildland /urban interface fires. Other
preventative measures include Fire Department review of site plans / development application,
community education and outreach and code enforcement activities aimed at reducing potential
hazards in the WUI areas. The primary preventative measure administered by the Saratoga
Fire Protection District is the City's Early Warning Fire Alarm System that is required for most
new residential construction. This system alerts the Fire Department as soon as a fire occurs,
with the intention of reducing fire response time and potential damage to the structure and
surrounding area.
Protecting Saratoga residents and businesses from the harmful effects of hazardous materials
and waste is a high priority. Although the City does not have a significant amount of hazardous
materials/ waste generators or businesses that store these materials, there is still some risk
associated with the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Through the
Draft February 2013
122
C17Y OF
A R. A T if r ar�f1scd.
0 SAFETY ELEMENT
promotion of effective handling, use, treatment, and disposal of hazardous materials and waste,
as well as the education of Saratoga residents on these issues, the City is committed to
maintaining a safe community for existing and future residents and businesses. The entitlement
review/ approval process and adherence to current and future State and Federal regulations will
also help ensure that new developments within the City incorporate the necessary protections
and improvements to reduce the risk and exposure of hazardous materials release and
minimize impacts of a release. Prevention of future releases is of great importance due to the
City's reliance on groundwater resources for drinking water.
iv. Emergency Preparedness
The City of Saratoga desires a high level of emergency preparedness and response services to
its residents. Working closely with the Santa Clara County Office of Emergency Services, Fire
Department and Sheriff's Office, the City strives to promote safer development of the hillside
areas and facilitate effective notification and response to emergency situations through their
development review processes. Understanding that many aspects of the Fire Department's and
Sheriff's Office operations are beyond City control, ongoing collaboration with these agencies on
existing and future training and equipment needs will be a priority.
The Emergency Operations Plan is the master document that organizes emergency
preparedness and response efforts in Saratoga. The Emergency Operations Plan provides a
framework for coordination with other agencies at the regional and state levels. Each
department involved in implementation of the Emergency Operations Plan has the responsibility
to internalize the plan in its own operations, as well as keep the plan up -to -date. Dedicated staff
support from the Santa Clara County Fire Department has assisted the City in ensuring regular
update, maintenance, and implementation of the Emergency Operations Plan.
Public awareness and education is a critical part of emergency preparedness. An educated
public will know how to prevent injury and property damage during and after emergency events,
and also know how to find and offer help to their neighbors. Through collaboration with the
Santa Clara County Office of Emergency Services and promotion of educational programs like
Community Emergency Response Team (CERT), community members receive the training
needed to be self- sufficient during a major emergency. In addition to this, the City and the
Santa Clara County Fire Department work to disseminate basic emergency preparedness
information to the residents and businesses of Saratoga.
Draft February 2013
123
C11Y OF
A R. A T if r ar�f1scd.
B. GOALS, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
The following goals, policies, and implementation measures have been developed to guide
development within the City of Saratoga. The purpose of this information is to establish a policy
framework that is consistent with the City's vision, that meets the community's needs and that
effectively addresses the potential hazards that could impact the City. In addition, the City of
Saratoga Annex to the Santa Clara County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) is hereby
incorporated into this Safety Element by reference. The LHMP, last adopted by the City of
Saratoga on February 15, 2012, is required to be updated every five years to maintain eligibility
for Hazard Mitigation Assistance grant programs administered by FEMA pursuant to the
Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. The LHMP contains a vulnerability analysis highlighting specific
facilities at risk to natural hazards and outlines strategies for reducing risk to the identified
hazards.
i. Land Instability Hazards
Goal SAF -1: Protect residents from injuries and minimize property damage resulting
from land instability and geologic hazards.
Policy SAF -1.1: No development shall be permitted in geologic hazard areas without
individual site - specific geotechnical investigations to determine depth of bedrock, soil
stability, location of rift zones and other localized geotechnical problems.
Implementation Measure SAF -1.1a: As part of the development review process, a
qualified Geotechnical Consultant will review proposals involving sites having potential
land instability or geologic hazards and will make recommendations accordingly
Policy SAF -1.2: Development in areas subject to natural hazards shall be limited and
shall be designed to protect the environment, inhabitants and general public. In areas
that have been proven to be unsafe, development of structures for human habitation
shall be prohibited to the maximum extent permitted by law.
Policy SAF -1.3: Proposals for General Plan amendments, zone changes, use permits,
variances, building site approvals, and all land development applications subject to
environmental assessment according to CEQA guidelines shall be reviewed for
hazardous conditions utilizing the most current data.
Draft February 2013
124
CITY Ot'w
SARATWA SAFETY ELEMENT
Implementation Measure SAF -1.3a: Mitigation measures to eliminate potential geologic
hazards identified during the environmental review process will be required as conditions
of development.
ii. Seismic Hazards
Goal SAF -2: Protect residents of the City and surrounding areas from seismically
induced hazards.
Policy SAF -2.1: In order to mitigate the danger of earthquake damage, the City shall
enforce strict earthquake construction and soil- engineering standards, selecting the most
stable areas for development and requiring developers to compensate for soil
instabilities through approved engineering and construction techniques.
Policy SAF -2.2: Critical structures and systems vital to the public health and safety
(water, power and waste disposals systems, police and fire stations and communication
facilities) shall be designed to mitigate any seismic or geologic hazards associated with
their sites.
Implementation Measure SAF -2.2a: When made available, the City should update the
Safety Element to incorporate the latest mapping produced by the United States
Geological Survey (USGS) and California Geological Survey (i.e. Alquist- Priolo Special
Study Zones, Seismic Hazards Mapping Reports, etc.).
Policy SAF -2.3: The City should comply with State statutes regarding the identification
and retrofit of non - reinforced masonry structures.
X. Flood Hazards
Goal SAF -3: Reduce damage to public and private property resulting from flooding and
flood induced hazards.
Policy SAF -3.1: All proposed projects adjacent to floodways and floodplains that could
affect Water District right -of -way, should be referred to the District for review and
comments.
Policy SAF -3.2: The City shall continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance
Program.
Draft February 2013
125
CIIY 0��W
SARATWA
SAFETY ELEMENT
Implementation Measure SAF -3.2a: The City will maintain and enforce a Floodplain
Management Ordinance, based on the national Model Floodplain Management
Ordinance to satisfy the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program.
Policy SAF -3.3: The City shall continue to enforce its existing regulations pertaining to
impervious coverage to reduce potential hazards from excessive run -off.
Implementation Measure SAF -3.3a: Implement the City's impervious coverage
regulations by continuation of existing zoning regulations as contained in the City Code.
iv. Fire Hazards
Goal SAF -4: Reduce the danger of property damage and loss of life due to urban and
wild fires.
Policy SAF -4.1: The City shall require the installation of an early warning fire alarm
system in each of the following cases:
a. All new single - family dwellings and any existing single - family dwellings that are
expanded by fifty percent or more in floor area, where such new or expanded
dwellings are located within designated hazardous fire area.
b. All new single - family dwellings having a gross floor area in excess of 5,000 square
feet.
c. Any existing single family dwelling that is expanded by fifty percent or more in floor
area which, after such expansion, will exceed 5,000 square feet in gross floor area.
d. All new multi - family dwellings and other new structures having multiple sleeping
units, such as hotels, motels, apartments, condominium or other community housing
projects, townhouses and nursing homes.
e. Any existing multi - family dwelling or other existing structure having multiple sleeping
units as described in Paragraph (d) above, which is expanded by fifty percent or
more in gross area.
Implementation Measure SAF -4.1a: Implement through continuation of existing
subdivision, zoning and building regulations as contained in the City Code.
Policy SAF -4.2: The City shall coordinate with the Santa Clara County Fire Safe Council
on preventing and reducing future losses from wildfires.
Draft February 2013
126
CITY Ot'w
SARATWA
Implementation Measure SAF -4.2a: The City shall coordinate with the Santa Clara
County Fire Department, and surrounding hillside communities on the preparation and
implementation of a Community Wildfire Protection Plan.
Implementation Measure SAF -4.2b: Conduct fuel load management activities within the
City's Wildland -Urban Interface areas to reduce fire potential on public and private
properties and increase fire response effectiveness.
Policy SAF -4.3: The Fire Chief, having jurisdiction, should be authorized to require the
installation of an early warning fire alarm system in any new commercial structure or
community facility, or expansion of an existing commercial structure by fifty percent or
more in gross floor area, whenever the Fire Chief deems such requirement to be
necessary or appropriate on the basis of facts and circumstances in each individual
case.
Implementation Measure SAF -4.3a: Implement through continuation of existing
subdivision, zoning and building regulations as contained in the City Code.
Policy SAF -4.4: The City shall encourage all property owners to install an early warning
fire alarm system on a voluntary basis where such owners are not otherwise required to
do so.
Implementation Measure SAF -4.4a: Implement by continuation of existing provision in
the building regulations allowing voluntary installation of the system and publicize the
availability of the system for any property located within the City.
Policy SAF -4.5: The City shall continue to enforce existing regulations pertaining to
hazardous fire areas (wildland -urban interface), fire retardant construction and
landscaping (fuel modification).
Implementation Measure SAF -4.5a: Periodically review subdivision, zoning and building
regulations that pertain to hazardous fire areas to determine if significant changes are
required.
Implementation Measure SAF -4.5b: Update the City's Wildland -Urban Interface map
and Fire Hazard Areas Map, when new data and information is made available by local,
State, and Federal agencies.
Draft February 2013
127
CITY Ot'w
SARATWA
Policy SAF -4.6: The City shall coordinate with the Santa Clara County Fire Department
on the need for additional fire prevention regulations for the built up, populated areas of
the City.
Implementation Measure SAF -4.6a: The City, in cooperation with the County of Santa
Clara Fire Department, will review and modify, as necessary, existing building
regulations to require Type A & B fire retardant roof materials in the densely populated
flatlands of the City.
v. Emergency Preparedness
Goal SAF -5: Develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan which will provide
effective response in the event of a natural or manmade disaster.
Policy SAF -5.1: The City shall review and update on a regular basis its plan for
emergency response and preparedness. This plan shall use local resources and
manpower to provide maximum benefit and protection for the City's residents.
Implementation Measure SAF -5.1a: Review and update annually the City's Emergency
Operations Plan, modifying the plan if significant changes are required. Sections of the
plan which are incomplete will be completed in a timely manner.
Implementation Measure SAF -5.1b: Coordinate with Public Works Department, Santa
Clara County Fire Department and Santa Clara County Office of Emergency Services on
the identification and provision of funding sources to construct an evacuation route along
the existing right -of -way already obtained by the City connecting Norton Road to
Piedmont Road.
Policy SAF -5.2: The City shall coordinate its Emergency Operations Plan with local
jurisdictions and regional agencies to anticipate cumulative impacts during times of
disaster.
Implementation Measure SAF -5.2a: Coordinate with Santa Clara County Office of
Emergency Services to review the County and adjacent jurisdictions' plans and resolve
areas of potential conflict.
Implementation Measure SAF -5.2b: On an annual basis, the City will review the Santa
Clara County Multi- Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan and the City's Local
Draft February 2013
128
CITY Ot'W
SARATWA
Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex to ensure that identified mitigation actions are being
incorporated into upcoming City sponsored projects, where appropriate.
Policy SAF -5.3: The City shall encourage all citizens to take responsibility for their own
safety in the event of a disaster.
Implementation Measure SAF -5.3a: The City shall publicize and participate in disaster
preparedness exercises and distribute emergency planning information to the citizens of
Saratoga.
Implementation Measure SAF -5.3b: The City shall coordinate with Santa Clara County
Office of Emergency Services on potential disaster preparedness training opportunities
(i.e. CERT, Red Cross, etc...) for Saratoga residents.
Draft February 2013
129
to
CITY Ot'W
SARATWA
REFERENCES
i. City of Saratoga Emergency Operations Plan, July 2009.
SAFETY ELEMENT
ii. County of Santa Clara Multi- Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2011.
iii. City of Saratoga Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex, 2012.
iv. National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Rate Maps Panel 219 of 830, Effective
May 18, 2009.
v. Santa Clara County Fire Department Strategic Plan January 2010 to December 2014.
vi. Taming Natural Disasters: Multi- Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan for the San
Francisco Bay Area, 2010 Update, Association of Bay Area Governments.
vii. County of Santa Clara Health and Safety Element of the General Plan, 1994
viii. Seismic Hazard Maps for the Castle Rock Ridge Quadrangle (August 11, 2005) and
Cupertino Quadrangle (September 23, 2002), California Geological Survey.
ix. Alquist - Priolo Special Studies Zones for the Castle Rock Ridge Quadrangle (July 1, 1974)
and Cupertino Quadrangle (July 1, 1974), California Geological Survey.
x. Liquefaction Hazard Maps for Three Earthquake Scenario for the Communities of San Jose,
Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos, Los Gatos, Milpitas, Mountain View, Palo Alto, Santa Clara,
Saratoga, and Sunnyvale, Northern Santa Clara County, California. United States
Geological Survey, Open File Report 2008 -1270.
Websites
Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health:
http: / /www.sccgov.org/ sites /deh/ Hazardous°/o 20Materials% 20Compliance %20Division /Hazardo
us %20Materials %2OProgram %2OHome/ Pages/ Hazardous - Materials- Program- Home- Page.aspx
Draft February 2013
130
56
CITY Ot'W
SARATW&
APPENDICES
Appendix A — Glossary
Appendix B — Adopted Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
SAFETY ELEMENT
Appendix C — Geologic and Seismic Hazards Constraints Mapping (Awaiting completion by the
City's Consultant)
Draft February 2013
131
P
CIIY 0��W
SARATWA
Draft February 2013
This page was intentionally left blank
'�
CITY Ot'W
SARATWA
Appendix A — Glossary
0 SAFETY ELEMENT
Active Fault Zone: Fault area that has experienced displacement during the past 11,000 years,
indicating that further movement might occur.
Floodplain: The area bordering a stream that becomes flooded when the stream overflows its
channel.
Lifelines: Public facilities and services that the metropolitan populations are dependent upon,
such as transportation and communication networks, power, gas and water lines.
Mercalli Scale: A scale of earthquake intensity ranging from I to XII. Based on observable
effects at a given place.
Potentially Active Fault Zone: Fault area showing evidence of surface displacement during
Quaternary time or the last 2 million years.
Rift Zone: A large fault where lateral movement occurs.
Richter Scale: A scale of earthquake magnitude based on the logarithm (base 10) of the
amplitudes of the defections created by earthquake waves and recorded by a seismograph.
Rural Residential: Low density single - family residential development and agricultural uses with
compatible conditional uses. Local jurisdiction usually provides a minimal level of service.
Seismic: Pertaining to an earthquake or earth vibration, including those that are artificially
induced.
here of Influence: That area outside the City's incorporated boundary, but designated by the
Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission as the unincorporated area most
likely to be influenced and annexed by the City in the future.
Tilt -Up Structure: Concrete walls are poured on the ground, allowed to harden, and then tilted
into place.
Urban Residential: Medium to high density single — and multi - family residential development and
compatible conditional uses. Local jurisdiction usually provides full array of urban services.
Draft February 2013
133
CIIY 0��W
SARATWA
Draft February 2013
This page was intentionally left blank
CITY Ot'w
SARATWA
Appendix B — Adopted Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
Draft February 2013
135
SAFETY ELEMENT
1 -1
CIIY 0��W
SARATWA
Draft February 2013
This page was intentionally left blank
'�
Contents
Section 21 City of Saratoga .............................................................................. ...........................21 -3
21.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. ...........................21 -3
21.2 Internal Planning Process ....................................................................... ...........................21 -9
21.3 Capability Assessment ........................................................................... ..........................21
-17
21.3.1 Mitigation Progress ........................................................................ ..........................21
-17
21.3.2 Staff and Organizational Capabilities ............................................ ..........................21
-18
21.3.3 National Flood Insurance Program ................................................ ..........................21
-32
21.3.4 Resource List: ..........................................................................................................
21-33
21.4 Vulnerability Assessment ...................................................................... ..........................21
-33
21.4.1 Critical Facilities ............................................................................ ..........................21
-33
21.4.2 Exposure Analysis .......................................................................... ..........................21
-34
21.5 Mitigation Actions ................................................................................. ..........................21
-55
21.5.1 Primary Concerns ........................................................................... ..........................21
-55
21.5.2 Mitigation Actions ......................................................................... ..........................21
-55
21.6 Plan Maintenance ................................................................................... ..........................21
-59
21.7 City of Saratoga Appendix .................................................................... ..........................21
-60
21.7.1 Saratoga Attachment 1: Saratoga Outreach ................................... ..........................21
-60
21.7.2 Saratoga Attachment 2: Saratoga Strategies 2010 ......................... ..........................21
-62
21.7.3 Saratoga Attachment 3: Saratoga Exposure Analysis .................... ..........................21
-64
Figure 21 -1: Inventory of Soft -First Story Multi - Family Dwellings- City of Saratoga .................21 -43
Table 21 -1: Hazards of Most Concern .................................................................. ..........................21 -10
Table 21 -2: Items Readily Available to Respondents ........................................... ..........................21
-11
Table 21 -3: Adequate Homeowners Insurance ..................................................... ..........................21
-13
Table 21 -4: Earthquake Insurance ........................................................................ ..........................21
-13
Table 21 -5: Flood Insurance ................................................................................. ..........................21
-14
Table 21 -6: Property Changes to Reduce Future Damage from Hazards ............. ..........................21
-14
Table 21 -7: Place of Work in Hazard Areas ......................................................... ..........................21
-15
Table 21 -8: Key Departments in the City of Saratoga .......................................... ..........................21
-19
Table 21 -9: Technical Capability Matrix .............................................................. ..........................21
-21
Table 21 -10: Capital Improvements Spending ..................................................... ..........................21
-23
Table 21 -11: Availability of Ordinances that Support Hazard Mitigation ........... ..........................21
-30
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
P a , c 121-1
137
Table 21 -12: City of Saratoga Critical Facilities
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
138
.21 -33
Page 121 -2
SECTION 21 CITY OF SARATOGA
21.1 INTRODUCTION
This City of Saratoga Annex serves as an annex to the Santa Clara County Local Hazard Mitigation
Plan which is an annex to the 2010 Association of Bay Area Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, Taming
Natural Disasters. Pursuant to the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, the City Council adopted this
annex on February 15, 2012.
This annex is an update to the City's annex to the 2005 Association of Bay Area Local Hazard
Mitigation Plan, Taming Natural Disasters, as adopted on April 4, 2007.
San fa lam oul
c '
�.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
139
The City of Saratoga is a small -sized city,
located in the western region of Santa Clara
County, California. The City has a
population of 29,843 people, based on the
2000 census. For the Fiscal Year
2010/2011, the City's total general fund
budget is approximately $15 million. The
City employs 54 full time equivalents with
additional temporary and seasonal workers.
Law enforcement services are provided
under contract with the Santa Clara County
Sheriff's Office, and fire services are
provided by the combined Santa Clara
County Fire Department and the Saratoga
Fire Protection District.
Page 121 -3
This page intentionally left blank for double sided printing.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
140
Page 121 -4
RESOLUTION NO. E7 -020
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SARATO A
APPROVING THE ABAG REPORT "TAMING NATURAL [DISASTERS"
AS THE CITY OF SARATOGA ",S LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION FLAN
WHEREAS, the Bay Area is subject to various earthquake - related hazards such
as ground shaking, liquefaction, landsliding, fault surface rupture, and tsunamis; and
WHEREAS, the Bair Area is subject to various weather- related hazards including
wildfires, floods, and landslides, and
WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga recognizes that disasters do not recognize city,
aunty, or special district boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga seeks to maintain and enhance both a d aster -
reslstant City and regiGn by reducing the potential loss of fife,, lam }perty damage, and
environmental degradation from natural disasters, while acceleratir,g c conornic recovery
from those disasters, and
WHEREAS, the City is committed to increasing the disaster resistance of the
infrastructure, health, housing, economy, government services, education, environment,
and land use systems in the Cfty, as well as in the eay Area as a vie; and
WHEREAS, the federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 20W requires all cities,
counties, and special districts to have adopted a Local Hazard Mikigation Plan to receive
disaster mitigation funding from FEMA, and
WHEREAS, ABAG has approved and adapted the AI3AO report "Taming Natural
Disasters" as the multi jurisdictional Local hazard Mitigotbon Plan for the San Francisco
Bay Area;
BONY, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Saratoga adopts, and
adapts with its Iocall annex, thin multi- jurisdictional plan as its Local Hazard Mitigation
Pion.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVE13 that the City of Saratoga
commits to continuing to tale those achQns and initiating further actions, as appropriate,
as identified in the City Annex of that multi -jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan,
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
141
Page 121 -5
The above and foregoing resolution was approved arid adapted by the City Council of
the City of Saratoga on the 4th day of Aprll 2007 by the following vote:
AWES: Councilmernbers Jill Hunter, K2thleen icing, Chuck Page,
Vice! Mayor Ann Waltonsrnith, Mayor Aileen Kao
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Norge
ATT
, City Clerk
teen Koo, Mayor
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
142
Page 121 -6
RESOLUTION 12-410
A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SARATOiGA
APPROVING THE CITY OF SAF1rATOGA ANNEX TO THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY
ANNEX TO THE 2010 ABAG REPORT - TAMING NATURAL DISASTERS" AS THE
CITY OF SARATO+GA *S LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
WHEREAS, the ray Area is sub*t to various earthquake- related hazards such as
ground shaping, liquefaction, landsliding, fault surface rupture, and tsunarrais; and
WHEREAS, the Bay Area is subject to varj=s weather- rclatcd hazards including
wildfires, floods. and landslides, and
WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga recognizes that disasters ado net recognize city, county,
or special district boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the City seeks to maintain and enhance birth a disaster-resistant City and
region by reducing the potential lass of life, property damage, and environ7nnental degradation
frorn natural disasters, while accelerating economic recovery from those di=gters; and
WHEREAS, the City of Saratoga is cominined to increasing the disaster resistance cif the
intrastructurc, heakb, hh"ing, econorny, government services, education, environment, and land
use. systems in the City, as well as in the Bay Area as a whale; and
WHEREAS, the federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires all cities, counties, and
special districts to have adopted a Local hazard Mitigation Plan to receive disaster mitigation
Cunding from FE[w1A; and
W[IEREAS, ABAG has approved and adapted the ABAG report ` "Yarning Natural
Disasters" as the multi jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation flan for the San Francisco Bay
Area;
11 {)W, TEI_1:R FORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City adopts. and adopts with its local
annex. ibis multi- ,jurisdictional plant as its Local 11a7ard Mitigation Plan-
NOW, THEREFORE, BE YT VUI- 4-1-11LK 11L SOLO° CI) that the City commits to continuing to
Lake these actions and initiating further actions, as appropriate, as idcnti fled in Lbe City of
Saratoga Armex to the Covrnty of. Santa Clara Annex of that multi jurisdictional Local Hazard
Mitigation Plan and will consider including the mitigation strategics as the Implementation
Appendix of the :safety Element cif` its general Plan during the Safety Etement update process
now underway anti expected to be completed by December 2014.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
143
Page 121 -7
The above and foregaing resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meethig ofthe Saratoga
City Council held on the 15"' day of February 2012 by the following vole,
AYI� S-. Council Member MRnny Cappello, Emily Lo, Noward Miller. Vice Mayor ]ill
IIunter. Mayor Chixk Page
NOES: Norte
ABSENT: Nolte
ABSTAIN: one
ATTEST,
�oyv" DATE: 1V �t %.?6
Crydl Morrow, City Clerk
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
144
Page 121-8
21.2 INTERNAL PLANNING PROCESS
The City of Saratoga participated in the regional planning process coordinated by ABAG and the
local planning process coordinated by Santa Clara County OES as noted in Section 3 of this plan.
The City of Saratoga participated in one City /County workshop sponsored by ABAG, as it was most
relevant to the City's size and operations.
For more information on meetings held by ABAG and for rosters of attendees, please see Appendix
A and H in the ABAG Multi- Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 (MJ- LHMP). In
addition, the City of Saratoga has provided written and oral comments on the multi jurisdictional
plan and provided information on critical facilities to ABAG.
Barbara Powell, Assistant City Manager, served as the City's representative and lead for completing
this annex. Supported by Jim Yoke, Emergency Services Coordinator, the City was represented at
Local Planning Team meetings #1, #2, and #3. Barbara and Jim performed internal reviews and
collaboration in order to provide all of the required information for development of this annex.
Contact information: bpowellksarato ag ca.us, 408.868.1215
Key staff met to identify and prioritize mitigation strategies appropriate for the City. Staff members
involved in these meetings included the Community Development Director, Building Official, Public
Works Director and Assistant City Manager. Representatives from the Santa Clara County Sheriff's
Office, Santa Clara County Fire Department and Saratoga Fire Protection District were also present.
The City of Saratoga's internal planning team included the following individuals:
Barbara Powell, Assistant City Manager
Jim Yoke, Emergency Services Coordinator
John Cherbone, Public Works Director
John Livingstone, Community Development Director
Brad Lind, Building Official
Public Outreach
The City provided the opportunity for the public to comment on the draft mitigation strategies
selected by City staff at the City Council meeting on November 4, 2009. The meeting is streamed
live on the City of Saratoga website and the draft mitigation strategies were available on the City
website. No public comments were received from either the meeting or the internet posting. A copy
of the meeting minutes are included in Saratoga Attachment 1: Outreach Materials.
The City Council will adopt the plan in a public meeting via an official Resolution upon approval by
FEMA. During the next update of the Seismic Safety and Safety Element of the City of Saratoga's
General Plan the relevant mitigation strategies will be incorporated as an implementation appendix.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
145
Page X21 -9
The City of Saratoga notified residents and businesses of the hazard mitigation planning process by
posting an announcement regarding the public opportunity to respond to the online survey discussed
in Section 3.2.6 in the County Annex. A copy of the survey is included in County Attachment 7:
Survey Outreach Materials, found in Section 9.7. The following media was utilized:
• City Website (http: / /www.saratoga.ca.us/)
Copies of the City's outreach materials are included in Section 21.7, Saratoga Attachment 1:
Outreach Materials.
Survey Results
On November 1, 2010, the Local Planning Team released an online survey to solicit public input
regarding concerns for hazard risk. The Local Planning Team also used this survey to gauge the level
of public preparedness for emergencies. The survey responses received from the City of Saratoga
residents are summarized below:
1. 28 out of 541 survey respondents were from the City of Saratoga.
2. Respondents were asked which five hazards, out of the 31 hazards the LPT identified, are of
most concern to their neighborhood or home. Below are responses from the City of Saratoga
(in order of most responses):
Table 21 -1: Hazards of Most Concern
Hazard
Number of
Responses
Infrastructure: Water System Disruption no potable water
19
Infrastructure: Electrical System Disruption no power)
18
Earthquake: Ground Shaking
17
Infrastructure: Wastewater System Disruption sewer backup)
12
Infrastructure: Telecommunication System Disruption (no phone / cell
service
10
Wildfire
10
Earthquake: Surface Rupture
9
Infrastructure: Energy System Disruption no as
8
Earthquake: Liquefaction
6
Disease and Outbreak
5
Infrastructure: Transportation Disruption (blocked roads / failed bridges)
5
Drought
4
Additional Hazard *
4
Earthquake: Landslides
2
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
146
Page 121 -10
Hazard
Number of
Responses
Hazardous Materials Spills (chemical/biological
2
Landslide and Debris flow
2
Agricultural Pests and Diseases
1
Dam Failure
1
Expansive Soils
1
Flood
1
Heat (extreme heat)
1
Land Subsidence soil compaction due to subsurface water removal
1
Bay Area Silting
0
Delta Levee Failure
0
Freeze
0
Hailstorm
0
Solar Storm
0
Thunder/Lightning Thunder/Lightning Storms
0
Tornado
0
Tsunami
0
Volcano
0
Wind (high winds
0
* Respondents noted the following additional hazards: bomb threat, air pollution, and
electromagnetic pulse attack
3. Respondents were asked if a severe hazard event occurred today, such that all services were cut
off from their home and they were unable to leave or access a store for 72 hours, which items they
would have readily available. Below is a summary of responses from the City of Saratoga
respondents:
Table 21 -2: Items Readily Available to Respondents
Item that is Readily Available
Responses
Flashlight with batteries
28
Blankets
27
First Aid Kit
24
Canned / Non-perishable Foods (ready to eat
21
Portable AM/FM Radio solar powered, hand crank,or batteries
21
Potable Water 3 gallons per person)
20
Extra Medications
16
Cash
14
Handheld " Walkie- Talkie" Radios with batteries
12
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
147
Page 121 -11
Item that is Readily Available
Responses
Important Family Photos /Documentation in a water and fire proof
container
8
What else is in your emergency kit? *
7
* Respondents noted the following additional items in their emergency kits: stove, water filter,
emergency rescue equipment, HAM radio, tent, bedding, tarps, lanterns, medical supplies, pet food,
water purifying tablets, clothing, fire wood, camping equipment, fire extinguisher, and tools
4. Respondents were asked if they were familiar with the special needs of their neighbors in the event
of a disaster situation.
• 18, or 64.3% of respondents, answered that they are not familiar with the special
needs of their neighbors.
• 10, or 35.7% of respondents, answered that they are familiar with the special needs
of their neighbors.
5. Respondents were asked if they are trained members of their Community Emergency Response
Team (CERT).
• 16, or 61.5% of respondents, indicated that they are part of CERT.
• 3, or 11.5% of respondents, indicated that they are not part of CERT, but would like to
learn more about CERT.
• 7, or 26.9% of respondents, indicated that they are not part of CERT and are not
interested in being a trained CERT member.
• 2 respondents skipped this question.
Respondents were asked to share why they are a trained CERT member or why they are not part of
CERT. The received responses are listed below:
• Going to attend CERT academy starting in February 2011. I am the co- coordinator of
Saratoga MRC now.
• I felt it was important to know and prepare for disaster, living in an area where it could strike
anytime
• My husband is trained through his employment and we have offered to be more involved in
our neighborhood.
• I wanted to help my family, then neighbors in the event of an earthquake. I was an RN in the
ER.
• I want to be able to help out our neighborhood and the community if disaster strikes.
• I initially took the training to help my family. Now, in addition, I want to help my neighbors
in the event of an emergency.
• I have two small kids and no extra time.
• Was in CERT, but left because I wasn't happy about the way it was being run.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
.•
121-12
6. Respondents were asked what is the most important thing local government can do to help
communities be more prepared for a disaster. The following summarizes the 24 responses received:
• Citizen /City training and education
• Seismic warning systems
• Have each community start a local food bank
• Raise awareness about CERT
• Community outreach describing disaster preparedness
• Ensure disaster communication systems and warnings
• Help residents purchase disaster preparedness kits /supplies
• Maintain road infrastructure
7. Respondents were asked if they live in an apartment building or home with a living space above a
garage or parking area.
• 25, or 89.3% of respondents indicated that they do not live in an apartment or home
with living space above a garage or parking area.
• 3, or 10.7% of respondents, indicated that they do live in an apartment building or
home with living space above a garage or parking area.
Those respondents who indicated that they do live in an apartment building or home with living
space above the garage or parking area were asked to describe their level of concern for the building
to collapse in a large earthquake event. 2 respondents indicated "Moderate Concern".
8. Respondents who are homeowners were asked if they have adequate homeowners insurance to
cover the hazards that could impact their home. Below is a summary of responses:
Table 21 -3: Adequate Homeowners Insurance
Answer
Responses
Yes, my insurance coverage should be adequate
20
No, I don't believe my insurance coverage would be adequate for a major disaster
6
Unsure
0
I do not have an insurance policy
0
Not applicable, I rent my current residence
2
9. Respondents were asked if they have earthquake insurance. Below is a summary of responses:
Table 21 -4: Earthquake Insurance
Answer
Responses
Yes, I own my home and have earthquake insurance.
7
Yes, I rent my home and have earthquake insurance.
0
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
149
21 -13
Answer
Responses
No, but I am interested in reviewing earthquake insurance options.
1
No, earthquake insurance is too expensive.
17
No, I do not need earthquake insurance.
2
10. Respondents were asked if they have flood insurance. Below is a summary of responses:
Table 21 -5: Flood Insurance
Answer
Responses
Yes, I own my home and have flood insurance.
4
Yes, I rent my home and have flood insurance.
0
No, but I am interested in reviewing flood insurance options.
4
No, I do not need flood insurance
20
11. Respondents indicated the following as additional insurance listed for their home or property:
• Fire
• Homeowners
• Umbrella
• Liability
• Property
12. Respondents were asked what they are doing to their property or within their home to reduce
future damage from the hazards identified above. Below is a summary of responses:
Table 21 -6: Property Changes to Reduce Future Damage from Hazards
Property Mitigation
Responses
Roof retrofit using fire resistant material
10
Seismic retrofit of the structure and/or foundation
8
Defensible space landscaping clear vegetation around house to reduce wildfire risk
8
Installed backflow prevention devices
6
Strengthened openings to reduce high hazard wind risk
3
Other *
2
House elevation or first floor modification to prevent flood damage
1
*The responses to "Other" were: "Secure fall over hazards, put child latches on cupboards" and
"New home"
13. Respondents were asked if they work in Santa Clara County.
• 21, or 75% of respondents, indicated that they do work in Santa Clara County.
• 7, or 25% of respondents, indicated that they do not work in Santa Clara County.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
150
Page 121 -14
14. Respondents were asked if their place of work is in an area susceptible to natural hazards.
Below is a list of natural hazards and responses from survey respondents:
Table 21 -7: Place of Work in Hazard Areas
Natural Hazard
Response
Earthquake fault zone
12
I don't know
6
Other *
5
Wildland urban interface wildfire risk area
3
High-risk flood zone
1
Liquefaction zone
1
Landslide risk area
0
* The responses to "Other" were: "Retired" and "There is a power relay station next door. Also, we
are near the airport."
15. Respondents were asked if their employer has a plan for disaster recovery in place.
• 11, or 52.4% of respondents, indicated that their employer does have a disaster
recovery plan in place.
• 4, or 19% of the respondents, indicated that their employer does not have a
disaster recovery plan in place.
• 6 respondents were unsure if their employer has a disaster recovery plan in place.
• 7 respondents skipped this question.
16. Respondents were asked if their employer has a workforce communications plan to implement
following a disaster so they may contact their employees.
• 12, or 57.1 % of respondents indicated that their employer does have a workforce
communications plan.
• 5, or 23.8% of respondents indicated that their employer does not have a workforce
communications plan.
• 4, or 19% of respondents indicated that they are unsure if their employer has a
workforce communications plan.
• 7 respondents skipped this question.
17. Respondents were asked to list any studies that they are aware of being conducted within their
community or the county regarding the risk to future hazard events. There were no responses to this
question.
18. Respondents were asked what recommendations they have for Santa Clara County and the
incorporated cities to improve identification, prioritization, and implementation of actions intended to
reduce future damage and increase resiliency. The following recommendations were received:
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
151
Page 121 -15
• Retrofit infrastructure
• Improve communications during a disaster
• Put power, cable, and phone lines underground
• Come up with an evacuation plan so the highways are not clogged
19. Respondents were asked to recommend any companies or local associations that should be
involved in the Santa Clara County hazard mitigation planning process. The recommended
organizations are listed below and were given the opportunity to review the draft plan as noted in the
following section.
• Santa Clara County Health Department
• Kaiser Santa Clara and Kaiser San Jose
20. Respondents were asked if they would like to review and comment on a draft of their
jurisdictions annex to the Multi - Jurisdictional Multi- Hazard Mitigation Plan.
• 9, or 37.5% of respondents said they would like to review and comment on the draft
plan.
• 15, or 62.5% of respondents said they would not like to review and comment on the
plan draft.
• 4 respondents skipped this question.
Seven respondents who said they would like to review and comment on the draft plan included their
contact information and were given the opportunity to review the draft plan as noted in the following
section.
21. Respondents were asked to provide any additional comments /suggestions /questions. The
responses are summarized below:
• We should plan for an Electromagnetic Pulse attack. See,
http:// www. onesecondafter. com/ pb /wp_d10e87d9 /wp_d10e87d9.html.
Review Opportunities
A review draft of this plan was submitted to Cal EMA on April 11, 2011 and subsequently forwarded
to FEMA for review and comment regarding compliance with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000.
During this time the review draft was available for public review on the websites of the Santa Clara
County Office of Emergency Services and the Association of Bay Area Governments. Additionally,
the City posted a notification on the City's website regarding the availability of the plan for public
review. The review draft was emailed to members of the public who expressed interest in their online
survey responses. No comments were received on the review draft.
Copies of the website posting and email notification are included in Section 21.7, Saratoga
Attachment 1: Outreach Materials.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
152
Page 121 -16
21.3 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT
21.3.1 Mitigation Progress
21.3.1.1 Strategy Ranking
The City of Saratoga participated in ABAG's revision of the regional strategies for development of
this annex. Appendix G of Taming Natural Hazards presents a summary list of mitigation strategies
with regional priorities and the hazards mitigated.
The City ranked those strategies in a spreadsheet provided by ABAG using the following scale:
Existing Program
Existing Program, Underfunded
Very High — Unofficial Program — Becomes Official on Plan Adoption, No Funding Needed
High — Actively Looking for Funding
Moderate
Under Study
Not Applicable, Not Appropriate, or Not Cost Effective
Not Yet Considered
Results of this ranking may be viewed online
at http: / /www.abag.ca. _off v/bayarea /eqmaps /mitigation/strateg,y.html. A summary of these rankings is
presented in Saratoga Attachment 2: Saratoga Strategies 2010, in Section 20.7.
The countywide Local Planning Team reviewed the priorities as ranked by the participating Santa
Clara County jurisdictions to determine the operational area goals and objectives. The City of
Saratoga's primary objectives are to minimize risk to earthquake, wildfire, and flood. New mitigation
actions the City of Saratoga has identified are discussed in Section 21.5.
21.3.1.2 Evaluation of Progress from 2005 Plan
Section
Sub - section
Mitigation
INFR -a-
8) Pre - position emergency power
The City purchased and installed two
Multihazard
generation capacity (or have
emergency generators for buildings that did
rental /lease agreements for these
not previously have back -up power.
generators) in critical buildings of
cities, counties, and special districts
to maintain continuity of government
and services.
INFR —d —
5)Pursue funding for the design and
Flooding
construction of storm drainage
In fiscal year 2010/11, the Santa Clara
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
153
Page 121 -17
Section I Sub- section I Mitigation
INFR -g-
Public
Education
HEAL — b —
Ancillary
Health -
Related
Facilities
GOVT —c—
Participate
in National,
State, Multi-
jurisdictional
and
Professional
Society
Efforts to
Identify and
Mitigate
Hazards
projects to protect vulnerable
properties, including property
acquisitions, upstream storage such
as detention basins, and channel
widening with the associated right -
of -way acquisitions, relocations, and
environmental mitigations
5) Facilitate and/or coordinate the
distribution of materials that are
prepared by others, such as by
placing materials in city or utility
newsletters, or on community access
channels as appropriate
3) Encourage these facility operators
to create, maintain, and /or continue
partnerships with local governments
to develop response and recovery
plans.
2) Recognize that emergency services
is more than the coordination of
police and fire response, for it also
includes planning activities with
providers of water, food, energy,
transportation, financial, information
and public health services.
21.3.2 Staff and Organizational Capabilities
21.3.2.1 Departmental Responsibilities
Valley Water District is undertaking a
project to prevent flooding in the Calabazas
Creek area, which will protect homes,
business and schools in parts of Saratoga.
In fiscal year 2009/10, the City of Saratoga
implemented a new website with a "news"
feature. We have regularly been posting
public education materials and notices on
the website.
In fiscal year 2009/10, the City of Saratoga
held a disaster preparedness table top
exercise in which City staff, and
representatives from two Fire Districts, the
Red Cross, Water system operators and
several ancillary health facilities
participated.
The City of Saratoga operates several departments with capabilities for implementing hazard
mitigation strategies. These departments and their roles and responsibilities are summarized in the
following table.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
154
Page 121 -18
Table 21 -8: Key Departments in the City of Saratoga
Departments
• Administrative Services
This department has responsibility for the general financial management of the City.
• City Manager's Office
The 5- member City Council provides overall policy direction, with the City Manager
responsible for implementing adopted City policies. The City Manager's office oversees the
following tasks: (Note: those related to hazard mitigation are highlighted)
o Animal control, under contract with the City of San Jose
• Cable television
• Community and intergovernmental relations
• Community relations and communications with other government entities
• Emergency preparedness
o Human resources
• Police services under contract with Santa Clara County
• Risk management
• Solid waste and recycling
• Volunteer services
• Community Development
The Community Development Department encompasses the Planning, Arborist, Building
and Code Enforcement Divisions.
• Planning
The primary responsibility of the Planning Division is Zoning Administration.
Zoning Administration encompasses all aspects of land development review,
including: keeping the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances current and
effective; meeting and consulting with potential applicants regarding the
development review process; reviewing development proposals for consistency
with the City's Plans and Ordinances and forwarding recommendations to the
Planning Commission and City Council; plan- checking approved projects and
following through with on -site inspections; considering annexation requests,
and; analyzing County projects within the City's Sphere of Influence for
consistency with the City's Plans and Ordinances. The Planning Division also
includes Advance Planning responsibilities for planning assignments.
• Arborist
Not specifically related to hazard mitigation.
o Building and Code Enforcement
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
155
Page 121 -19
The Building Inspection Division is responsible for administering the Uniform
Building Code requirements, both through the plan- checking and on -site
inspection process. The Code Enforcement Division is responsible for
enforcing the Municipal Code and for administering both special business
license and event permit requirements and parking fine and false alarm
collections.
• Public Works
Public Works oversees three divisions - Engineering, Streets, and Parks.
• Engineering
Reviews and manages construction of capital projects and the public's
development plans for engineering and geological oversight, and ensures the
City's environmental responsibilities are fulfilled
• Streets
Maintains the roadway systems, including streets, signals, lighting, and storm
drains
• Parks
Maintains the City's parks, trails, medians, right -of -ways, landscape districts
and City Hall
• Recreation & Facilities
This Department creates community through programs, camps, classes, teen
events, facility rentals, & theatre management.
With a clear hazard mitigation strategy, as outlined in this Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, the City's
departments are able to implement their ongoing policies and programs with consideration of the
identified hazard risks. In addition, these departments become aware of priority mitigation actions
and can offer resources (financial or staffing) to assist with the implementation of those actions.
21.3.2.2 Technical Capability
For a successful mitigation program, it is necessary to have a diverse breadth of staff and technical
capabilities. Planners, engineers, building inspectors, emergency managers, floodplain managers,
people familiar with Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and grant writers are all essential to
implementing mitigation actions. The following table summarizes the staffing capabilities available
within the City of Saratoga.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
156
Page 121 -20
Table 21 -9: Technical Capability Matrix
Technical Capability Matrix
Land Use Planners
Community Development
Emergency manager
City Manager's Office
Civil or Building Engineers
Public Works
Floodplain manager
Public Works
Staff knowledgeable about
hazards
City Manager's Office
GIS staff
Public Works
Grant writers
City Manager's Office; Public
Works
21.3.2.3 Fiscal Capability
The following summarizes Saratoga's fiscal capabilities in terms of the City's financial resources and
allocated spending. Property Tax and Capital Program Funding are the primary sources of Saratoga's
financial resources. The City has allocated the majority of financial resources to Salaries & Benefits,
Consultant & Contract Services, and Capital Improvements. These three categories are all relevant
for implementing hazard mitigation actions.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
157
Page 121 -21
TOTAL ]REVENUES & TRA-N-SFERS I-N-
BY CATEGORY
FY 2009/10 Revenues by Category
Propel- Tax
935,000
Sales & Use Tax
Franchise Fee Tax
1.7 39,000
Transient Occupancy Tax
1z-:,o.000
Business/ Other Taxes
50.5.00®
Fees, Ucen&&s 8, Pern-n-ts
1.328,750
Intergovernniental
6s1,39r
City* Services
1,711,531
Interest Income
341,2-00
REmtal Income
364,342
Other Sources
7358,210
Internal Service Cliaxges
2-173,00
C.apitad Fioo ice. Funding
6,361,1
IN m
*mmm� 1-d 14.090
Ftmd Transfer's In:
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
o
6,o oosp '6poo'c'cp '00PP& le4ok-0,000
158
Page 121-22
TOTAL EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS OUT
BY CATEGORY
Salaides &- Benefits
Materials Supplies
Fees &- Charges
ConsWt S: Contract Ser -dees
ConunimiLy Gi--ants
Meetings, Event "kTraining
Firmed Assets
Debt Sen ice
Intenial Senice Cliarges
Capital Inipmvements
Fmid'h-crosfers Out:
FY 2009110 Expenditures by Category
o c duo OCP ads PPP
_ ] � Alp ,� X01 r„d
The funding values in the table below, along with the pie chart, are summarized from the City of
Saratoga Capital Improvements Plan. The hazard mitigation strategy as outlined in this Local Hazard
Mitigation Plan may be implemented as funding and staff resources allow.
Table 21 -10: Capital Improvements Spending
Capital Improvements
Spending
Streets
Parks &
Facility
Administrative
Jurisdiction
Program
Trails
Program
improvement
Total Budget
Program
Program
City of
Saratoga
6,605,289
3,146,220
1,153,969
219,773
11,125,251
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
159
Page 121 -23
C'A.PIT.0 PR.OGR2MM BUDGET BY PROTECT CATEGORY
Facility
Pro ar'(111]1
10 , .0
Part: &- Ti-ail
Proml1ln.
",3,300
Administrative
Pro�-,,'I —ax ,
C~A,PITAL. PROGRAm BUDGET BY FUND
CIP Facility
'u k , JLa.�� °`
Park &- Ti -ail
ximit Fund.
1+_%
CIP Park
Tnail Fund,
14.0°6
Gas Tax Fuu
8.0
CIP
.A,(1111111iSt3 1tiVe
Fui1d, :2-o%
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
160
streets
,26.2%
:s (aunt
, -3. -, °o
11
Page 121 -24
21.3.2.4 Policy or Program Capability
The City of Saratoga has several plans and ordinances in place which provide ample opportunities for
implementing the hazard mitigation strategy outlined in this plan.
21.3.2.4.1 Summary of Plans that Support Hazard Mitigation
Emergency Operations Plan
The City of Saratoga's Emergency Operations Plan (EOP):
• identifies hazards that exist in Saratoga and the likelihood that they will occur in the City,
• outlines the strengths and weaknesses of the municipality in its preparedness activities, and,
• guides the City and agencies through a response to any emergency and through the recovery
process of a disaster.
Two purposes of Saratoga's emergency plan are to enhance the development of Local Hazard
Mitigation Planning on an ongoing basis and to support collaboration efforts between municipal staff
and external partners such as fire services, law enforcement, utility organizations, colleges,
community groups, and volunteers. The plan is designed to address the needs of all people located in
Saratoga when a disaster happens. An outline of the EOP as it relates to hazard mitigation is
provided below.
Hazard Analysis- The EOP ranks hazards by their likelihood to occur in Saratoga and the severity of
the hazard if it were to occur. The hazards listed in the EOP include: aviation disaster, civil
disturbance, earthquake, extreme weather /storm, floods, landslides, HAZMAT, heat wave, public
health emergency, terrorism, transportation- highway, wildfire /forest fire.
Prevention & Mitigation- The EOP lists hazard specific mitigation actions to take in order to reduce
the severity of damage that may result from the hazards listed above. The hazards and the hazard
specific mitigation actions are listed below.
Earthquake
0 Inspect all structures for non - structural hazards and mitigate them
O Provide Personal Emergency Preparedness training to City employees and
volunteer responders
O Continue community education efforts
2. Wildfire
0 Promote approved messages about fire safety and vegetation management in
vulnerable areas
0 Perform specific weed and brush abatement actions per City Council
resolution
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
161
Page 121 -25
3. Flood
0 Regularly inspect storm drains and keep clean
4. Heat Wave
0 Supervisors of City employees must ensure that employees receive sufficient
breaks and water if working outdoors
0 Cooling centers are promoted to the public
Public Health Hazards
0 During outbreaks of contagious disease follow directions from the County
Public Health Department
0 Encourage social distancing and proper hygiene
0 Ill employees must be sent home or to medical care
0 Increase the availability of public education campaigns
0 Encourage school surveillance processes
Hazardous Materials
0 Encourage familiarity with MSDS binders in the workplace
0 Train staff to store, use, and dispose of hazardous materials properly
0 Promote safe disposal of hazardous materials in the community
0 Promote education in large population buildings, shopping centers and
schools regarding the Shelter in Place protocol for hazardous materials
emergencies
7. Terrorism
0 Train staff to recognize suspicious packages and /or boxes, particularly those
who process the mail.
0 Train residents to be aware of the surroundings and to be willing to report
suspicious activity to the Sheriff's Office
Preparedness- The Preparedness section of the EOP details the City of Saratoga emergency
organization, including the role of the Disaster Council, City Council, Mayor, and Director of
Emergency Services. The plan also details the organization and roles of other City agencies and
volunteers working in the field and at emergency operations centers. The organization and role of
Santa Clara County, the State of California, and federal agencies is also documented in this plan.
The Preparedness section also provides brief explanations of other hazard mitigation related
documents; such as a Heat Wave Plan, Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, Saratoga Community
Emergency Response Team (CERT) Operations Plan and Communications Plan, Point of
Distribution Plan, Terrorism/WMD Plan, and a Volunteer Management Plan. Preparing and
educating the public is deemed a responsibility of the American Red Cross, Saratoga CERT, and
Santa Clara County Fire Department in this section of the plan. Also, methods to protect vital
records by using a backup system are documented. The City of Saratoga has designated the areas to
the west of Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road and south of Highway 9 as a high fire hazard area. New
construction in that area must comply with California Building Code Chapter 7A, which requires fire
safe construction standards. A Weed and Brush Abatement program, requiring property owners to
clear weeds and brush, also exists in Saratoga in an effort to reduce the risk of wildfire.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
162
Page 121 -26
Response- The response section of Saratoga's EOP defines three levels of emergency that can be
declared in the City and describes when the EOP and/or Emergency Operations Centers (EOC) are
activated. The location and functions of the EOCs in Saratoga are listed in this section.
Recovery- The mitigation aspect of recovery operations is critical in reducing or eliminating disaster
related property damage and loss of lives from reoccurring. The immediate post- disaster period
presents a rare opportunity for mitigation. During this time, officials and citizens are more
responsive to mitigation recommendations, and unique opportunities to rebuild or redirect
development may be available. Recovery plans would benefit from addressing mitigation planning
as part of the recovery process. Changes in building codes, variances or set -backs in construction,
zoning (to reduce types of construction in high hazard areas), and relocation or removal of structures
from high hazard zones are some forms of mitigation that may aid in hazard mitigation in the future.
General Plan
The General Plan charts the future of the City as expressed by the citizens and consists of goals,
policies, action programs, area plans, and basic information regarding the City of Saratoga.
Saratoga's General Plan facilitates hazard mitigation in several ways. Following is a brief summary
of three General Plan Elements highlighting the capabilities for implementing and supporting hazard
mitigation.
Safety Element
The City of Saratoga recognizes within the Safety Element that public safety is the overarching goal
in all new land -use planning in order to mitigate natural hazards. Housing development within
Saratoga is designed with safety as a priority being maintained through regular building safety
inspections. The community has identified its priority safety concerns, such as ensuring that gas,
water and sewer leaks are identified and are cleaned up. Precautions are undertaken for emergency
workers, in order to reduce exposure to toxic substances in the event of an emergency. Precautionary
planning is integrated into all the City's planning in order to mitigate future risk. The Safety Element
is an integral component of Saratoga's policy. No development will be permitted without an
individual site - specific geotechnical investigation to determine soil stability, location of rift zones
and the potential for other localized geotechnical problems. An early warning fire alarm system will
be installed in all new single and multi - family dwellings. The city continues to enforce flood control
regulations. It cooperates with the Santa Clara Valley Water District in regards to projects which
impact floodways, in order mitigate the impact of development on flood hazards.
Land Use Element
The city's land use planning policies, as outlined in the Land Use Element, address future growth
with the consideration of hazard mitigation. Rezoning has supplemented existing zoning code
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
163
Page 121 -27
provisions to meet the demand for temporary shelters. The Land Use Element notes that all future
land use and planning shall be in accordance with mitigation of public safety hazards, such as natural
hazards impacted through increased development. The City of Saratoga aims to employ a wise use of
natural resources to avoid natural hazards. These uses include agriculture, mineral extraction, parks
and low intensity recreational facilities, land in its natural state, wildlife refuges and very low
intensity residential development.
Housing Element
Housing in the City of Saratoga aims to address risks through use of appropriate building materials
and site location and regular inspection. The city has a Building Inspection Division which is
responsible for administering the Uniform Building Code requirements. This occurs through the
plan- checking and on -site inspection processes. The Code Enforcement Division is responsible for
enforcing the Municipal Code and for administering both special business license and event permit
requirements and parking fine and false alarm collections. The City of Saratoga's building and fire
codes support hazard mitigation. The city participates in the National Flood Insurance Program and
Community Rating System. The city has facilities and infrastructure in place for the construction and
availability of emergency housing. Lines of communication have been developed and established to
work with appropriate federal agencies in order to obtain housing resources in the event of an
emergency. Accommodations have been made for rehabilitation to fair and low - income housing in
order to maintain residences in line with safety standards. The City aims to "assist low - income
property owners in improving substandard dwelling units ". High risk development areas will be
limited to development in order to protect the environment and public health. The City requires
installation of an early warning fire alarm system for all new housing. Future housing on hillsides
shall implement grading along natural contours to avoid erosion, flooding slides and other hazards.
Class "A" roof materials will be used in high fire zones to reduce risk. In addition, new development
shall incorporate materials which take into account seismic concerns.
Floodplain Man agem en t Plan
In an effort to reduce the risk of loss of life, health, and property due to periodic flood inundation, the
City of Saratoga has developed a floodplain management plan. The plan is designed to minimize the
expenditure of public money for flood control projects, the need for rescue and relief efforts, business
interruptions, and damage to public facilities and utilities. The floodplain management plan also
ensures that potential buyers are notified that property is in an area of special flood hazard and that
those who occupy property in those areas are held responsible for their actions. A floodplain
administrator is responsible for the enforcement of this plan.
To reduce flood losses, the plan includes methods and provisions to control the alteration of natural
floodplains, stream channels, and protective barriers; to control filling, grading, dredging and other
development that can increase flood damage; to regulate the construction of flood barriers which can
divert flood waters or increase flood hazards in other areas; and to require that uses vulnerable to
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
164
Page 121 -28
floods be protected against flood damage at the time of their construction. One of the provisions of
this plan is that a development permit must be obtained before any construction or development
begins and that certain construction standards, such as anchoring, building with flood resistant
materials, and elevating and floodproofing, are required within an area of special flood hazard. The
plan also enforces that new and replacement water and sanitary sewage systems should be designed
to minimize flood water infiltration and discharge into flood waters. Standards are also included for
subdivisions and manufactured homes.
Capital Improvements Plan
There are several projects listed within the City of Saratoga's Capital Improvements Plan,
particularly in the Streets Program section, the Facility Projects Section, and the Administrative
Projects Section, that may contribute to implementation of the mitigation strategy.
Streets Program- The Streets Program includes projects that develop and maintain the City's
roadway system to provide safe and efficient traffic flows, street lighting for traffic safety,
development and maintenance of street surfaces, storm drain systems, curbs, gutters and
sidewalks, bridges and retaining walls, and utility undergrounding. Street repair and resurfacing
keeps the streets in good condition and reduces liability expenses caused by roads in poor
condition. Roadway safety projects and traffic calming are focused on reducing driver speed and
making pedestrians more visible in order to reduce the number of traffic accidents in the City.
Improvement to storm drains can mitigate the damage caused by floods, such as sink holes in
roadways, damage to private property, and soil erosion. Improvement to and installation of
sidewalk curbs, particularly vertical curbs that provide greater control of runoff water flow, can
also reduce the potential for flooding and flood damage. Repairs to bridges and retaining walls
can increase safety for pedestrians and vehicle users. Utility undergrounding projects, moving
overhead utilities underground, can reduce safety risks associated with downed power lines.
Fallen power lines can be especially problematic during winter storms.
Facilities Project Section- The Facilities Project Section includes projects for purchasing,
constructing or making capital repairs to City buildings, structures and equipment. The city -
owned buildings that are funded by these projects include the civic center, Saratoga Prospect
Center, Village Historical Park, and the library building. Repairs include installing alarm
systems, security locks, and general maintenance and improvements. Ongoing maintenance and
improvements helps to prevent larger problems and costs associated with deferred maintenance,
and increases the longevity of City facilities. Safety - related maintenance reduces liability
expenses.
Administrative Improvement Projects Section- The Administrative Improvement Projects
Section includes projects designed to improve the City's information technology infrastructure
and communication systems. Upgrading the City's telecommunication system from PBX to
Voice over Internet Protocol is expected to increase the reliability of the City's phone system.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
165
Page 121 -29
This added reliability will be especially important during emergency situations. The City has
also purchased and installed an emergency power supply to provide power to the City's server
room and the building during power outages. This project will ensure that City operations
remain active during power outages and it is especially critical during emergency situations.
21.3.2.4.2 Summary of Ordinances that Support Hazard Mitigation
Table 21 -11: Availability of Ordinances that Support Hazard Mitigation
The City of Saratoga identified several ordinances and policies currently utilized for hazard
mitigation in the matrix of regional mitigation strategies prepared by ABAG as part of the 2010 plan
update. Below is a summary of these key ordinances and policies.
Floodplain Management Ordinance
The City of Saratoga has participated in the National Flood Insurance Program since 1973. The City
of Saratoga filed NFIP Regular Program (with base flood elevation) biennial reports for calendar
year 2007 and 2008 (filed in 2009). In 1996, the City's Municipal Code Article 16 -66 Flood Plain
Management via City Council adoption of Ordinance No. 71 -167. The City of Saratoga utilizes
digital flood insurance rate maps, flood insurance studies, and other studies supplied by applicants
when developing properties located in flood hazard areas to regulate development in flood hazard
areas. The City has no repetitive flood loss properties.
Ordinance 256
Ordinance 256 adds Articles 16 -16 and 16 -17; repeals and replaces Articles 16 -15 and 16- 20 -16-
35. Article 16 -16 relates to repair and reconstruction, and Article 16 -17 relates to excavation and
grading. The California Building Standard Code does not provide for damaged structures to be
repaired or reconstructed to a structurally safe level, accounting for upgrades in wind and seismic
standards. The ability to repair structures based upon the most recent industry knowledge is
necessary to prevent or mitigate unnecessary future damage or injury. Therefore, Article 16 -16 is
added and referred to as the `Repair and Reconstruction Code'. The City of Saratoga's dense
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
166
Page 121 -30
.N
ti
v
Ln
to Z3
U
o
�
to
to
O
O O
A O
City of
Saratoga
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
NO
The City of Saratoga identified several ordinances and policies currently utilized for hazard
mitigation in the matrix of regional mitigation strategies prepared by ABAG as part of the 2010 plan
update. Below is a summary of these key ordinances and policies.
Floodplain Management Ordinance
The City of Saratoga has participated in the National Flood Insurance Program since 1973. The City
of Saratoga filed NFIP Regular Program (with base flood elevation) biennial reports for calendar
year 2007 and 2008 (filed in 2009). In 1996, the City's Municipal Code Article 16 -66 Flood Plain
Management via City Council adoption of Ordinance No. 71 -167. The City of Saratoga utilizes
digital flood insurance rate maps, flood insurance studies, and other studies supplied by applicants
when developing properties located in flood hazard areas to regulate development in flood hazard
areas. The City has no repetitive flood loss properties.
Ordinance 256
Ordinance 256 adds Articles 16 -16 and 16 -17; repeals and replaces Articles 16 -15 and 16- 20 -16-
35. Article 16 -16 relates to repair and reconstruction, and Article 16 -17 relates to excavation and
grading. The California Building Standard Code does not provide for damaged structures to be
repaired or reconstructed to a structurally safe level, accounting for upgrades in wind and seismic
standards. The ability to repair structures based upon the most recent industry knowledge is
necessary to prevent or mitigate unnecessary future damage or injury. Therefore, Article 16 -16 is
added and referred to as the `Repair and Reconstruction Code'. The City of Saratoga's dense
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
166
Page 121 -30
population is located in an area of high seismic activity and steep slopes susceptible to erosion. The
provisions in the 2007 California Building Code provide only general direction and therefore Article
16 -17 `Excavation and Grading Code' is added. It addresses areas of critically expansive soil and
other unstable soil conditions which create a need for soil retention and diversion or increased flow
of surface waters, particularly on steep slopes.
Ordinance 71 -167
This ordinance repeals and replaces article 16 -66 relating to floodplain management. The revised
article includes methods and provisions to:
(a)Restrict or prohibit uses which are dangerous to health, safety, and property due to water or
erosion hazards, or which result in damaging increases in erosion or flood heights or velocities;
(b)Require that uses vulnerable to floods, including facilities which serve such uses, be protected
against flood damage at the time of initial construction;
(c)Control the alteration of natural floodplains, stream channels, and natural protective barriers,
which help accommodate or channel flood waters;
(d)Control filling, grading, dredging, and other development which may increase flood damage; and
(e)Prevent or regulate the construction of flood barriers which will unnaturally divert flood waters or
which may increase flood hazards in other areas.
Ordinance 71 -193
Ordinance 71 -193 amends Articles, 16 -05, 16 -15, 16 -20, 16 -25, 16 -30, 16 -35, 16 -40 and 16 -45, of
the Saratoga Code of Ordinances. And adopts "by reference the following building standards codes
comprising part of the California building standards code: The 1997 editions of the uniform building
code as amended, the uniform fire code as amended, the uniform plumbing code, the uniform
mechanical code as amended, the 1996 edition of the national electrical code and the 1997 editions of
the uniform housing code as amended and the abatement of hazardous buildings code, as amended..."
Ordinance 215
Ordinance 215 adds Sections 16- 15.065 and 16- 15.095; amends Sections 16- 15.010, 16- 15.030, 16-
25.010, 16- 35.010 and Article 16 -30; and repeals Section 16- 05.020. These articles include the
General Provisions for Building Regulations, Building Code, Fire Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical
Code, Electrical Code, Housing Code, and Abatement of Dangerous Building Code. Some of the
general implications of this ordinance include the following: California Building Standards Code
became effective for the City of Saratoga; the City of Saratoga has the right to amend the California
Building Standards Code where amendments are necessary because of local conditions; adoption of
the 2001 California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical, and Electrical Codes; defines types of
construction, correct designations and references in the Saratoga City Code.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
167
Page 121 -31
21.3.3 National Flood Insurance Program
For decades, the national response to flood disasters was simply to provide disaster relief to flood
victims. Funded by citizen tax dollars, this approach failed to reduce losses and didn't provide a way
to cover the damage costs of all flood victims. To compound the problem, the public generally
couldn't buy flood coverage from insurance companies, because private insurance companies
consider floods too costly to insure. In the face of mounting flood losses and escalating costs of
disaster relief to U.S. taxpayers, Congress established the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
The goals of the program are to reduce future flood damage through floodplain management, and to
provide people with flood insurance. Community participation in the NFIP is voluntary.
The City of Saratoga has participated in the National Flood Insurance Program since 1973. All
residents of the City are eligible to purchase federal flood insurance. The City of Saratoga filed NFIP
Regular Program (with base flood elevation) biennial reports for calendar year 2007 and 2008 (filed
in 2009). In 1996, the City's Municipal Code Article 16 -66 Flood Plain Management was
implemented via City Council adoption of Ordinance No. 71 -167.
The City of Saratoga utilizes digital flood insurance rate maps, flood insurance studies, and other
studies supplied by applicants when developing properties located in flood hazard areas to regulate
development in flood hazard areas.
21.3.3.1 Community Rating System (CRS)
The CRS is a voluntary part of the National Flood Insurance Program that seeks to coordinate all
flood - related activities, reduce flood losses, facilitate accurate insurance rating, and promote public
awareness of flood insurance by creating incentives for a community to go beyond minimum
floodplain management requirements. The incentives are in the form of insurance premium
discounts. CRS ratings are on a 10 -point scale (from 10 to 1, with 1 being the best rating), with
residents of the community who live within FEMA's Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA) receiving
a 5% reduction in flood insurance rates for every Class improvement in the community's CRS rating.
The City of Saratoga has not joined the Community Rating System.
21.3.3.2 Repetitive Loss Properties
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) insures properties against flooding losses
in the Bay Area through the National Flood Insurance Program.
As part of the process to reduce or eliminate repetitive flooding to structures across the United
States, FEMA has developed an official Repetitive Loss Strategy. The purpose behind the
national strategy is to identify, catalog, and propose mitigation measures to reduce flood losses to
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
Page 121 -32
the relatively few number of structures that absorb the majority of the premium dollars from the
national flood insurance fund.
A repetitive loss property is defined by FEMA as "a property for which two or more
National Flood Insurance Program losses of at least $1,000 each have been paid within any 10-
year period since 1978."
The City of Saratoga has no repetitive flood loss properties.
Source: htip:H quake. abag .ca.gov /mitigation/floodloss/
21.3.4 Resource List:
Documents used in the assembly of this Capability Assessment include: City website, City FY09 /10
Budget, Capital Improvements Budget, Emergency Operations Plan, General Plan, Floodplain
Management Plan, Capital Improvements Plan, Ordinance 256, Ordinance 71 -167, Ordinance 71-
193, and Ordinance 215.
21.4 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
21.4.1 Critical Facilities
During the development of this 2011 annex, the City identified 27 critical facilities and provided this
list to ABAG in participation with the regional planning process. A summary listing of these
facilities is shown in Table 21 -12.
Table 21 -12: City of Saratoga Critical Facilities
Facility Name
Address
Critical Function
MUSEUM
20450 SARATOGA AVE
CONCESSION /RSTRM
12970 GLEN BRAE DR
RESTROOM FACILITY
PRK /RSTRM /SNKBR
12970 GLEN BRAE DR
RESTROOM FACILITY
RESTROOM
20764 FOURTH ST
RESTROOM FACILITY
MODULAR A
13777 FRUITVALE AVE
WARNER HUTN BLDG
13777 FRUITVALE AVE
KITCHEN & RESTROOM
FACILITY
CITY HALL /NEW WING
13777 FRUITVALE AVE
KITCHEN & RESTROOM
FACILITY /IT SERVER ROOM
THEATER
13777 FRUITVALE AVE
LARGE GROUP MEETING
CONG SPR STRG
12970 GLEN BRAE DR
CONGSPR SCRKEEP
12970 GLEN BRAE DR
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
169
Page 121 -33
Facility Name
Address
Critical Function
PROSPECT CENTER,
FRIENDSHIP HALL
19848 PROSPECT ROAD
KITCHEN & RESTROOM
FACILITY /LARGE GROUP
MEETING /SHELTER
PROSPECT CENTER,
GRACE BUILDING
19848 PROSPECT ROAD
RESTROOM FACILITY
CARETAKER CTAGE
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
PUMPHOUSE
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
CULTURAL EXCHANG
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
HAKONE PK OFFICE
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
MAIN HOUSE /PARK
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
GRDN PRK /EXHIBIT
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
COMMUNITY CNTR
19655 ALLENDALE AVE
KITCHEN & RESTROOM
FACILITY /LARGE GROUP
MEETING /SHELTER
CORP YARD
19700 ALLENDALE AVE
RESTROOM FACILITY /TOOLS &
EQUIPMENT /FUEL STORAGE
RESTROOM
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
RESTROOM FACILITY
STORAGE BLDG
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
GARAGE /GIFT SHOP
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
OLD LIBRARY
14410 OAK STREET
CITY HALL
13777 FRUITVALE AVE
RESTROOM
FACILITY /ALTERNATE EOC
LIBRARY
13650 SARATOGA AVE
RESTROOM
FACILITY /MEETING ROOMS
FIRE STATION /ADMIN OFF.
14380 SARATOGA AVE
CITY EOC
This list of critical facilities and available information for them is available digitally in an excel
spreadsheet from the City. A complete printing of the critical facilities data is included in Saratoga
Attachment 3: Saratoga Exposure Analysis.
21.4.2 Exposure Analysis
Exposure analyses are used to quantify assets which are "exposed" to risk. This is the first step
towards understanding the complete value of assets at risk to identified hazards. This section includes
an exposure analysis (discussion of assets at risk) for the profiled hazards in Section 4.
Overlay analyses (using GIS) were conducted for the mappable hazards such as wildfire, flood, and
the earthquake related hazards. These analyses compare the location of the critical facilities with the
mapped hazard area (i.e. floodplains, wildfire threat zones, shaking potential areas, etc.) and result in
a listing of which facilities are at most risk to which hazard. Not all hazards are mappable and some
hazards, such as drought, are equally likely throughout the entire County. For these hazards, a
general exposure summary is presented in Section 21.4.2.1.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
170
P a g c 121-34
21.4.2.1 General Exposure
ABAG's website (hqp://quake.abag.ca.gov/mitigation/landuse/) presents the results of the regional
exposure analysis through a searchable online database. Users can view the summaries of land use
and infrastructure exposed to the mappable hazards. This section presents the general summary of
landuse and infrastructure in the City of Saratoga. These should be considered at risk to the hazards
of equal likelihood throughout the entire County geography (i.e. drought, extreme heat,
thunderstorm, etc).
JURISDICTION: Saratoga
COUNTY: Santa Clara
HAZARD: Land Use
BASIS: Existing Land Use, 2005 using 2009 hazard mapping
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
171
21 -35
Total Acres
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL LAND [excluding mixed use]:
5,302
1 unit /1 -5 acre lot Rural Residential
1,793
1 -3 units /acre
1,515
3 -8 units /acre
1,923
>8 units /acre
71
Mobile Home Parks
0
TOTAL MIXED RESIDENTIAL /COMMERCIAL:
5
Within a Land Area
0
Within a Building
0
Mixture of Above or Unknown
5
TOTAL MIXED COMMERCIALANDUSTRIAL:
0
TOTAL INDUSTRIAL [excluding mixed]:
8
Light Industrial
7
Heavy Industrial
0
Salva e /Rec lin , Mixture or Unknown
0
Food Processing, Warehousing
0
TOTAL MAJOR INFRASTRUCTURE:
1,096
Roads, Highway and Related Facilities
1,077
Rail Stations, Yards and Related Facilities
0
Airports
0
Ports
0
Power Facilities
0
Municipal Wastewater Facilities
0
Municipal Water Supply Facilities
0
Communication Facilities
19
Infrastructure -- Other, Unknown
0
TOTAL MILITARY:
0
Military Residential
0
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
171
21 -35
Military Hospital
0
Military Communications
0
Military Airport or Port
0
General Military
0
Open Military Lands
0
Closed Military Facilities
0
TOTAL COMMERCIAL /SERVICES [excluding mixed]:
469
Subtotal - Commercial:
124
Retail/Wholesale
41
Research/Office
37
Comm. Outdoor Recreation
5
Other, Mixture or Unknown
41
Subtotal- Education:
276
Educational Offices and Day Care
0
Elementary/Secondary
140
Colleges/Universities
135
Stadium Facilities
0
University Housing
0
Day Care Facilities
l
Subtotal-Hospitals and Health Care
3
Trauma Center Hospitals
0
Community or Local Hospitals
3
Surgery Centers
0
State Prisons
0
State Mental Health Facilities
0
Clinics and Long-Term Care
0
Subtotal- Public Institutions:
65
Convention Centers
0
Sports Stadiums
0
Churches/Synagogues/Other
40
City Halls/County Administration
25
Local Jails
0
Local Police/Fire/Emergency
0
Other -Comm. Centers /Libraries
0
TOTAL URBAN OPEN:
364
Golf Courses
48
Racetracks
0
Campgrounds and Other
0
Cemeteries
11
Parks
118
Vacant -- Cleared for Redevelopment
0
Vacant—Undeveloped
176
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
172
21 -36
Mixed Urban Open, Including Parks
10
TOTAL AGRICULTURE:
93
Cropland and Pasture
3
Orchards/Groves/Vineyards
90
Greenhouses
0
Confined Feeding
0
Farmsteads and Inactive
0
TOTAL RANGELAND:
265
Herbaceous Range
171
Shrub and Brush
94
Mixed Range
0
TOTAL WETLANDS [Based on USGS Mapping]:
0
Forested
0
Non - Forested
0
Salt Evaporators
0
Wetlands -- Unknown
0
TOTAL FOREST LAND:
186
Deciduous
4
Evergreen
172
Mixed Forest
10
TOTAL SPARSELY VEGETATED:
0
Beaches
0
Other Sand
0
Bare Rock
0
Mines /Quarries
0
Transitional -- Landfills
0
Transitional - -Other
0
Transitional -- Mixture
0
Mixed Sparsely Vegetated
0
Total Acres
TOTAL URBAN LAND:
7,243
TOTAL NON -URBAN LAND:
544
GRAND TOTAL:
7,787
Source: Association of Bay Area Governments, 2009.
Note: Because of independent rounding, subcategories may not add to totals.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
173
Page 121 -37
JURISDICTION: Saratoga
COUNTY: Santa Clara
HAZARD: Land Use
BASIS: Existing Infrastructure, 2009
Source: Association of Bay Area Governments, 2009.
Miles of pipeline is an approximation based on miles of road within water service area
boundaries and does not include major auqeducts.
Miles of pipeline is miles of water pipelines. Miles of sewer pipelines should be
approximately the same.
Note: Because of independent rounding, subcategories may not add to totals.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
174
Page 121 -38
Total Miles
ROADS:
186
Interstate Highway
5
Prima US /State Highway
0
Secondary State /Co Highway
32
Local Road
143
Misc Ram /Road
6
TRANSIT:
0
Altamont Commuter Express ACE
0
Amtrak
0
Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART)
0
Caltrain
0
San Francisco Muni Metro
0
Santa Clara VTA
0
RAIL:
3
All Railroads
3
PIPELINES:
165
Pipelines Under Roads
165
Source: Association of Bay Area Governments, 2009.
Miles of pipeline is an approximation based on miles of road within water service area
boundaries and does not include major auqeducts.
Miles of pipeline is miles of water pipelines. Miles of sewer pipelines should be
approximately the same.
Note: Because of independent rounding, subcategories may not add to totals.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
174
Page 121 -38
21.4.2.2 Critical Facilities Exposure by Hazard
ABAG's website (http: / /quake.abag.ca ovg /mitigation/cf2O10 /) presents the results of the regional
facilities exposure analysis through a searchable online database. Users can view the summaries of
how many facilities are exposed to the mappable hazards by category: health care facilities, schools,
critical facilities, and bridges /interchanges. For the purposes of developing a City specific mitigation
strategy, this section identifies which of the City's critical facilities are located in the mapped hazard
areas.
The complete results from ABAG's exposure analysis are available digitally in an excel spreadsheet
from the City. A complete printing of these results is included in Saratoga Attachment 3: Saratoga
Exposure Analysis.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
175
Page 121 -39
21.4.2.2.1 Earthquake Related Hazards
Ground Shaking
Source: CA Department of Conservation
25 -26
Peak
Legend
Map
Saratoga Critical Facilities
Saratoga C dy Li m its
Bldg Insured
— Maj or Roads
Number
Shaking Potential
Address
!o G
6-g
240-250%
230-240%
0220-230%
14410 OAK
210 - 220%
5
-200 -210%
- 5
- 190 - 200%
STREET
-180 -190%
-
- 170 -180%
1g
160 -170%
4�
- 150 -160%
_
- 140 -150%
2
- 130 -140%
_ . -_'.27
-120 -130%
45
110 -120%
.16. -24
-100 -110%
19655
-90 -100%
g0ae,nYJa -_
-80 -90%
— 1E5
-70 -50%
g5
-M -70%
50-60%
40-50%
0%
3
20 -3] -30%
Avenue
-10 -20%
$3,308,565
$233,730
0
Source: CA Department of Conservation
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
176
Page 121 -40
Peak
Contents
Map
Acceleration
Bldg Insured
Insured
Number
Critical Facility
Address
%G
Value
Value
14410 OAK
1
OLD LIBRARY
STREET
155
$368,150
$0
20764 FOURTH
2
RESTROOM
Street
155
$36,383
$0
19655
COMMUNITY
ALLENDALE
3
CNTR
Avenue
135
$3,308,565
$233,730
19700
ALLENDALE
4
CORP YARD
Avenue
135
$595,000
$37,486
5
LIBRARY
13650
145
$2,369,417
$0
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
176
Page 121 -40
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012 P a g e 121-41
177
Peak
Contents
Map
Acceleration
Bldg Insured
Insured
Number
Critical Facility
Address
( %G)
Value
Value
SARATOGA
Avenue
PRK/RSTRM /S
12970 GLEN
6
NKBR
BRAE Drive
125
$158,760
$0
CONG SPR
12970 GLEN
7
STRG
BRAE Drive
125
$23,814
$0
CONGSPR
12970 GLEN
8
SCRKEEP
BRAE Drive
125
$16,758
$0
CONCESSION/
12970 GLEN
9
RSTRM
BRAE Drive
125
$110,853
$0
13777
FRUITVALE
10
CITY HALL
Avenue
145
$2,694,621
$340,674
13777
FRUITVALE
11
MODULAR A
Avenue
145
$30,000
$0
13777
WARNER
FRUITVALE
12
HUTN BLDG
Avenue
145
$369,000
$0
CITY
13777
HALL/NEW
FRUITVALE
13
WING
Avenue
145
$1,035,729
$340,673
13777
FRUITVALE
14
THEATER
Avenue
145
$0
$0
20450
SARATOGA
15
MUSEUM
Avenue
135
$222,000
$0
MAIN
21000 BIG
16
HOUSE /PARK
BASIN WAY
135
$185,220
$5,513
GRDN
21000 BIG
17
PRK/EXHIBIT
BASIN WAY
135
$267,908
$4,961
21000 BIG
18
RESTROOM
BASIN WAY
155
$36,383
$0
CARETAKER
21000 BIG
19
CTAGE
BASIN WAY
135
$195,000
$0
21000 BIG
20
PUMPHOUSE
BASIN WAY
135
$7,938
$0
STORAGE
21000 BIG
21
BLDG
BASIN WAY
135
$13,561
$0
GARAGE /GIFT
21000 BIG
22
SHOP
BASIN WAY
135
$13,561
$0
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012 P a g e 121-41
177
All facilities are at risk to "Extreme" perceived shaking and "Very Heavy" potential damage.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
178
Page 121 -42
Peak
Contents
Map
Acceleration
Bldg Insured
Insured
Number
Critical Facility
Address
( %G)
Value
Value
CULTURAL
21000 BIG
23
EXCHANG
BASIN WAY
135
$1,164,578
$0
HAKONE PK
21000 BIG
24
OFFICE
BASIN WAY
135
$30,165
$0
19848
N. CAMPUS
PROSPECT
25
ADMIN BLDNG
ROAD
125
$0
$0
19848
N. CAMPUS
PROSPECT
26
FELLOWSHIP
ROAD
125
$0
$0
FIRE
14380
STATION /ADM
SARATOGA
27
IN OFF.
Avenue
155
$6,000,000
$250,000
All facilities are at risk to "Extreme" perceived shaking and "Very Heavy" potential damage.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
178
Page 121 -42
Soft Story Multi- Family Dwellings
In 2003, the Collaborative for Disaster Mitigation at San Jose State University completed an
"Inventory of Soft -First Story Multi - Family Dwellings in Santa Clara County ". At that time, the city
of Saratoga had 9 soft -first story multi - family buildings including 262 residential units housing 655
occupants. Figure 21 -1 below identifies the locations of these buildings.
Inventory of Soflt -First Story Multi - Family Dwellings
City of Saratoga
Yo L -
Ii
I 1
�T
I� min+
! 4 - +-
�! '9± F.F7
Illl �"
r �-I
0.6 0 0.6 1.2 Mites
High density (more than 30)
0 Med density (10 - 29)
Low density (less than 'IU}
0 City Outline
Streets Sancta Clara
�r
VLF E
S
Map produced by
Collaborative for Disaster Mitigation
June 3 200
Figure 21 -1: Inventory of Soft -First Story Multi- Family Dwellings- City of Saratoga
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
179
-, 121-43
Earthquake Induced Liquefaction
Source: Santa Clara Planning Office
There are no critical facilities within the Liquefaction Susceptibility areas in the City of Saratoga.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
:1
Page 121 -44
Surface Rupture
Source: CA Geological Survey, State of CA Department of Conservation
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
181
Page 121 -45
With Fault
Rupture
Bldg
Contents
Map
Hazard
Insured
Insured
Number
Critical Facility
Address
Zone
Value
Value
12970 GLEN BRAE
6
PRK/RSTRM /SNKBR
Drive
Yes
$158,760
$0
12970 GLEN BRAE
7
CONG SPR STRG
Drive
Yes
$23,814
$0
12970 GLEN BRAE
8
CONGSPR SCRKEEP
Drive
Yes
$16,758
$0
12970 GLEN BRAE
9
CONCESSION/RSTRM
Drive
Yes
$110,853
$0
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
181
Page 121 -45
Earthquake Induced Landslides
Saratoga • Landslide Hazard Zones
W
25 -26
6 -9
i
15
• 15
•10 -14
'2
i •27
1
16 -2
R ;94asin 44a
Legend
Saratoga Critical Facilities
Saratoga City Limits
- Major Roads
Landslide Hazard Zones
Source: Santa Clara Planning Office, CA State Department of Conservation
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
182
Page 121 -46
Within
Landslide
Bldg
Contents
Map
Hazard
Insured
Insured
Number
Critical Facility
Address
Zone
Value
Value
21000 BIG BASIN
16
MAIN HOUSE/PARK
WAY
Yes
$185,220
$5,513
21000 BIG BASIN
17
GRDN PRK/EXHIBIT
WAY
Yes
$267,908
$4,961
21000 BIG BASIN
18
RESTROOM
WAY
Yes
$39,690
$0
CARETAKER
21000 BIG BASIN
19
CTAGE
WAY
Yes
$195,000
$0
21000 BIG BASIN
20
PUMPHOUSE
WAY
Yes
$7,938
$0
21000 BIG BASIN
21
STORAGE BLDG
WAY
Yes
$13,561
$0
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
182
Page 121 -46
21.4.2.2.2 Infrastructure Failure
The City of Saratoga does not have any additional unique concerns or vulnerabilities regarding the
hazard of infrastructure failure as presented in Section 4.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
183
Page 121 -47
Within
Landslide
Bldg
Contents
Map
Hazard
Insured
Insured
Number
Critical Facility
Address
Zone
Value
Value
21000 BIG BASIN
22
GARAGE /GIFT SHOP
WAY
Yes
$13,561
$0
CULTURAL
21000 BIG BASIN
23
EXCHANG
WAY
Yes
$1,164,578
$0
21000 BIG BASIN
24
HAKONE PK OFFICE
WAY
Yes
$30,165
$0
21.4.2.2.2 Infrastructure Failure
The City of Saratoga does not have any additional unique concerns or vulnerabilities regarding the
hazard of infrastructure failure as presented in Section 4.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
183
Page 121 -47
21.4.2.2.3 Wildfire
saratoga critical Zones
x
W
e
25 -26
�4
— 6 -9
15
i 5
• 016 -14 asi
4
2 _27,
1
16 -24
F3ig easi g, ^�;� D�
Legend
Saiato ga Critii F—liti.
Saiato ga City Li m6
— Major Roads
Fire H azard Zones
Hazard Class
-High High
-
High
OModerate
Source: CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
WA
Page 121 -48
Fire
Bldg
Contents
Map
Hazard
Insured
Insured
Number
Critical Facility
Address
Zone
Value
Value
Very
2
RESTROOM
20764 FOURTH Street
High
$36,383
$0
21000 BIG BASIN
Very
16
MAIN HOUSE/PARK
WAY
High
$185,220
$5,513
21000 BIG BASIN
Very
17
GRDN PRK/EXHIBIT
WAY
High
$267,908
$4,961
21000 BIG BASIN
Very
18
RESTROOM
WAY
High
$36,383
$0
19
CARETAKER CTAGE
21000 BIG BASIN
Very
$195,000
$0
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
WA
Page 121 -48
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012 P a g c 121-49
185
Fire
Bldg
Contents
Map
Hazard
Insured
Insured
Number
Critical Facility
Address
Zone
Value
Value
WAY
High
21000 BIG BASIN
Very
20
PUMPHOUSE
WAY
High
$7,938
$0
21000 BIG BASIN
Very
21
STORAGE BLDG
WAY
High
$13,561
$0
21000 BIG BASIN
Very
22
GARAGE /GIFT SHOP
WAY
High
$13,561
$0
21000 BIG BASIN
Very
24
HAKONE PK OFFICE
WAY
High
$30,165
$0
CULTURAL
21001 BIG BASIN
Very
23
EXCHANG
WAY
High
$1,164,578
$0
FIRE
STATION /ADMIN
14380 SARATOGA
27
OFF.
Avenue
High
$6,000,000
$250,000
I
OLD LIBRARY
14410 OAK STREET
Moderate
$368,150
$0
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012 P a g c 121-49
185
21.4.2.2.4 Flooding
i 25 -26
'D
6 -9
15
i 5
t
010 -14
2
27
16 -24 g
Legend
9rato9a Critical Faunas --
Q �amga ory ��
— mgo1 Rmtls
FEMA Hooding
FIOOG zone _ -w
® °d ANN DAL C FIANCE FLOOD FIAZARD 1
0 1 %Annual Chance Flootl
D 2 Hax aJ l �t
Source: FEMA- Santa Clara Countv DFIRM, 2009
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
Page 121 -50
Flood Zone
Bldg
Contents
Map
(% annual
Insured
Insured
Number
Critical Facility
Address
chance)
Value
Value
14410 OAK
1
OLD LIBRARY
STREET
.2%
$368,150
$0
20764 FOURTH
.2%
2
RESTROOM
Street
$36,383
$0
19655
.2%
ALLENDALE
3
COMMUNITY CNTR
Avenue
$3,308,565
$233,730
19700
.2%
ALLENDALE
4
CORP YARD
Avenue
$595,000
$37,486
13650 SARATOGA
.2%
5
LIBRARY
Avenue
$2,369,417
$0
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
Page 121 -50
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
187
Page 121 -51
Flood Zone
Bldg
Contents
Map
(% annual
Insured
Insured
Number
Critical Facility
Address
chance)
Value
Value
12970 GLEN
.2%
6
PRK/RSTRM /SNKBR
BRAE Drive
$158,760
$0
12970 GLEN
.2%
7
CONG SPR STRG
BRAE Drive
$23,814
$0
12970 GLEN
.2%
8
CONGSPR SCRKEEP
BRAE Drive
$16,758
$0
12970 GLEN
.2%
9
CONCESSION/RSTRM
BRAE Drive
$110,853
$0
13777
.2%
FRUITVALE
10
CITY HALL
Avenue
$2,694,621
$340,674
13777
.2%
FRUITVALE
11
MODULAR A
Avenue
$30,000
$0
13777
.2%
WARNER HUTN
FRUITVALE
12
BLDG
Avenue
$369,000
$0
13777
.2%
CITY HALL/NEW
FRUITVALE
13
WING
Avenue
$1,035,729
$340,673
13777
.2%
FRUITVALE
14
THEATER
Avenue
$0
$0
20450 SARATOGA
.2%
15
MUSEUM
Avenue
$222,000
$0
21000 BIG BASIN
.2%
16
MAIN HOUSE /PARK
WAY
$185,220
$5,513
21000 BIG BASIN
.2%
17
GRDN PRK/EXHIBIT
WAY
$267,908
$4,961
21000 BIG BASIN
.2%
18
RESTROOM
WAY
$36,383
$0
21000 BIG BASIN
.2%
19
CARETAKER CTAGE
WAY
$195,000
$0
21000 BIG BASIN
.2%
20
PUMPHOUSE
WAY
$7,938
$0
21000 BIG BASIN
.2%
21
STORAGE BLDG
WAY
$13,561
$0
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
187
Page 121 -51
Sea Level Rise
No facilities in Saratoga are at risk of being impacted by sea level rise.
21.4.2.2.5 Drought
All populations, facilities, and assets are equally at risk to impact from drought. The City of Saratoga
does not have any unique concerns regarding the hazard of drought as presented in Section 4.
21.4.2.2.6 Solar Storm
All populations, facilities, and assets are equally at risk to impact from solar storm events. The City
of Saratoga does not have any unique concerns regarding the hazard of solar storm as presented in
Section 4.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
Page 121 -52
Flood Zone
Bldg
Contents
Map
(% annual
Insured
Insured
Number
Critical Facility
Address
chance)
Value
Value
21000 BIG BASIN
.2%
22
GARAGE /GIFT SHOP
WAY
$13,561
$0
CULTURAL
21000 BIG BASIN
.2%
23
EXCHANG
WAY
$1,164,578
$0
21000 BIG BASIN
.2%
24
HAKONE PK OFFICE
WAY
$30,165
$0
N. CAMPUS ADMIN
19848 PROSPECT
.2%
25
BLDNG
ROAD
$0
$0
N. CAMPUS
19848 PROSPECT
.2%
26
FELLOWSHIP
ROAD
$0
$0
FIRE
.2%
STATION / ADMIN
14380 SARATOGA
27
OFF.
Avenue
$6,000,000
$250,000
Sea Level Rise
No facilities in Saratoga are at risk of being impacted by sea level rise.
21.4.2.2.5 Drought
All populations, facilities, and assets are equally at risk to impact from drought. The City of Saratoga
does not have any unique concerns regarding the hazard of drought as presented in Section 4.
21.4.2.2.6 Solar Storm
All populations, facilities, and assets are equally at risk to impact from solar storm events. The City
of Saratoga does not have any unique concerns regarding the hazard of solar storm as presented in
Section 4.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
Page 121 -52
21.4.2.2.7 Dam Failure
Legend
0, Saratoga Crftioal Faolities
— Major Roads
Saratoga City Lim Hs
Dam Failure In111NlA-, Areas
Areas chat can be inund.ved by any one of:
O1 dam only
O2 different dams
_ 3. different dams
_4 di 1—r Adams
_ 5 different dams
E
E--]�
�.
s
sa.
�4
a
Source: ABAG, 1995. Dam data from State of California Office of Emergency Services
There are no critical facilities located within a dam failure inundation area in Saratoga, CA.
However, Saratoga acknowledges that people impacted by dam failure and evacuating from Los
Gatos will come to Saratoga.
21.4.2.2.8 Disease Outbreak
All populations, facilities, and assets are equally at risk to impact from disease outbreak. The City of
Saratoga does not have any unique concerns regarding the hazard of disease outbreak as presented in
Section 4.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012 P a g e 121-53
21.4.2.2.9 Freeze
All populations, facilities, and assets are equally at risk to impact from freeze occurrences. The City
of Saratoga does not have any unique concerns regarding the hazard of freeze as presented in Section
4.
21.4.2.2.10 Wind
All populations, facilities, and assets are equally at risk to impact from high winds. The City of
Saratoga does not have any unique concerns regarding the hazard of wind as presented in Section 4.
21.4.2.2.11 Heat
All populations, facilities, and assets are equally at risk to impact from extreme heat events. The City
of Saratoga does not have any unique concerns regarding the hazard of heat as presented in Section
4.
21.4.2.2.12 Agricultural Pest
The City of Saratoga does not have any unique concerns regarding the hazard of agricultural pest as
presented in Section 4.
21.4.2.2.13 Thunder and Lightning
All populations, facilities, and assets are equally at risk to impact from thunder and lightning events.
The City of Saratoga does not have any unique concerns regarding the hazard of thunder and
lightning as presented in Section 4.
21.4.2.2.14 Siltation — Bay Area
The City of Saratoga does not have any unique concerns regarding the hazard of siltation as
presented in Section 4.
21.4.2.2.15 Tornado
All populations, facilities, and assets are equally at risk to impact from tornado occurrences. The City
of Saratoga does not have any unique concerns regarding the hazard of tornado as presented in
Section 4.
21.4.2.2.16 Hazardous Materials
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
190
Page 121 -54
Hazardous Materials spills are not of particular concern to the City of Saratoga.
21.4.2.2.17 Landslide and Debris Flow
Landslide and Debris Flow is not of particular concern to the City of Saratoga.
21.4.2.2.18 Other Hazards
Land Subsidence is not of particular concern to the City of Saratoga.
Expansive Soils are not of particular concern to the City of Saratoga.
Hailstorms are not of particular concern to the City of Saratoga.
Tsunami is not a hazard of concern for the City of Saratoga.
Volcano eruptions are not a hazard of concern for the City of Saratoga.
21.5 MITIGATION ACTIONS
21.5.1 Primary Concerns
Based on the exposure analysis, Saratoga's critical facilities are at significant risk to potential ground
shaking and flood. The western portion of the city is at risk to wildfire and landslide. A few critical
facilities fall within the zones of potential fault surface rupture.
21.5.2 Mitigation Actions
The City of Saratoga identified three specific mitigation actions for the 2011 update of this plan.
Following are descriptions and implementation plans for those actions.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
191
Page 121 -55
Problem Statement:
The City of Saratoga has a number of known, slow- moving landslides that could potentially impact
City -owned infrastructure (storm drains, roads).
Project Description:
Implement mitigation strategies (placement of engineered fill, construction of retaining walls) in
order to eliminate the potential for landslide areas to become critical hazards.
Corresponding ABAG Strategy Number:
Applicable Hazards
Significant
Moderate
Limited
Earthquakes
❑ Flood
❑ Land Subsidence
❑ Ground Shaking
❑ Drought
❑ Expansive Soils
❑ Liquefaction
❑ Solar Storm
❑ Hailstorm
❑ Surface Rupture
❑ Dam Failure
❑ Tsunami
® Landslides
❑ Disease and Outbreak
❑ Volcano
❑ Freeze
Infrastructure Failure
❑ Wind (high winds)
❑ Electrical System
❑ Extreme Heat
❑ Energy System
❑ Agricultural Pests
❑ Telecommunication System
❑ Thunder / Lightening Storms
❑ Transportation System
❑ Bay Area Silting
❑ Waste Water System
❑ Tornado
❑ Water System
❑ Hazardous Materials
(Chemical/Biological) Spills
❑ Delta Levee Failure
❑ Landslide and Debris Flow
❑ Wildfire
Potential Funding Sources: FEMA Mitigation Grant Funding
Responsible Department:
Public Works Development
Target Completion Date: To be determined
Additional Comments / Status Report:
The City has identified a minimum of $1 million in existing landslide mitigation projects; however, we
currently do not have funding to undertake this work.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
192
Page 121 -56
Problem Statement:
The City of Saratoga has approximately 50 privately owned soft story buildings that have not been
retrofitted to meet current seismic standards.
Project Description:
Provide incentives for private owners to retrofit soft story buildings. These incentives could take
the form of reduced planning application, building permit and inspection fees, or other suitable
incentives.
Corresponding ABAG Strategy Number: ECON b -3, b -4, b -7; HSNG c -3, c -4, c -7
Applicable Hazards
Significant
Moderate
Limited
Earthquakes
❑ Flood
❑ Land Subsidence
® Ground Shaking
❑ Drought
❑ Expansive Soils
❑ Liquefaction
❑ Solar Storm
❑ Hailstorm
❑ Surface Rupture
❑ Dam Failure
❑ Tsunami
❑ Landslides
❑ Disease and Outbreak
❑ Volcano
❑ Freeze
Infrastructure Failure
❑ Wind (high winds)
❑ Electrical System
❑ Extreme Heat
❑ Energy System
❑ Agricultural Pests
❑ Telecommunication System
❑ Thunder / Lightening Storms
❑ Transportation System
❑ Bay Area Silting
❑ Waste Water System
❑ Tornado
❑ Water System
❑ Hazardous Materials
(Chemical/Biological) Spills
❑ Delta Levee Failure
❑ Landslide and Debris Flow
❑ Wildfire
Potential Funding Sources: FEMA Mitigation Grant Funding
Responsible Department:
Community Development
Target Completion Date: To be determined
Additional Comments / Status Report:
The City has inventoried existing soft story buildings within its jurisdiction.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
193
Page 121 -57
Problem Statement:
The City of Saratoga has a number of storm drain systems that are insufficient and contribute to
flooding in low -lying areas, especially impacting the City's road network.
Project Description:
Install new underground storm drainage throughout most vulnerable areas in the City, particularly in
the Monte Vista/El Camino Grande and Chester Avenue areas.
Corresponding ABAG Strategy Number: INFR Flooding d -5, d -6
Applicable Hazards
Significant
Moderate
Limited
Earthquakes
® Flood
❑ Land Subsidence
❑ Ground Shaking
❑ Drought
❑ Expansive Soils
❑ Liquefaction
❑ Solar Storm
❑ Hailstorm
❑ Surface Rupture
❑ Dam Failure
❑ Tsunami
❑ Landslides
❑ Disease and Outbreak
❑ Volcano
❑ Freeze
Infrastructure Failure
❑ Wind (high winds)
❑ Electrical System
❑ Extreme Heat
❑ Energy System
❑ Agricultural Pests
❑ Telecommunication System
❑ Thunder / Lightening Storms
❑ Transportation System
❑ Bay Area Silting
❑ Waste Water System
❑ Tornado
❑ Water System
❑ Hazardous Materials
(Chemical/Biological) Spills
❑ Delta Levee Failure
❑ Landslide and Debris Flow
❑ Wildfire
Potential Funding Sources: FEMA Mitigation Grant Funding
Responsible Department:
Public Works
Target Completion Date: To be determined
Additional Comments / Status Report:
The City currently has approximately $750,000 in needed storm drain upgrades; however, we do not
have funding to pursue these improvements.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
194
Page 121 -58
21.6 PLAN MAINTENANCE
As required Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, the City of Saratoga will update this plan annex at least
once every five years, by participating in a multi- agency effort with ABAG and other agencies to
develop a multi jurisdictional plan.
The City Manager's Office will ensure that monitoring of this Annex will occur. The plan will be
monitored on an on -going basis. However, the major disasters affecting our City, legal changes,
notices from ABAG as the lead agency in this process, and other triggers will be used. Finally, the
Annex will be a discussion item on the agenda of the meeting of department leaders at least once a
year in April. At that meeting, the department heads will focus on evaluating the Annex in light of
technological and political changes during the past year or other significant events. The department
leaders will be responsible for determining if the plan should be updated.
The City Manager's Office will contact ABAG four years after this plan is approved to ensure that
ABAG plans to undertake the plan update process. If so, the City again plans to participate in the
multi jurisdictional plan. If ABAG is unwilling or unable to act as the lead agency in the multi -
jurisdictional effort, other agencies will be contacted, including the County's Office of Emergency
Services. Jurisdictions should then work together to identify another regional forum for developing a
multi jurisdictional plan.
The public will continue to be involved whenever the plan is updated and as appropriate during the
monitoring and evaluation process. Prior to adoption of updates, the County will provide the
opportunity for the public to comment on the updates. A public notice will be posted prior to the
meeting to announce the comment period and meeting logistics.
Mitigation Plan Point of Contact
Name: Crystal Morrow
Title: City Clerk
Mailing Address: 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070
Telephone: (408) 868 -1275
Email: cmorrow @saratoga.ca.us
Alternate Point of Contact
Name: Dave Anderson
Title: City Manager
Mailing Address: 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070
Telephone: (408) 868 -1216
Email: davea @saratoga.ca.us
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
195
Page 121 -59
21.7 CITY OF SARATOGA APPENDIX
21.7.1 Saratoga Attachment 1: Saratoga Outreach
The City of Saratoga notified residents and businesses of the hazard mitigation planning process by
distributing announcements regarding the public opportunity to respond to the online survey. This
Attachment includes those outreach materials. The City also provided the opportunity for the public
to comment on the draft mitigation strategies selected by City staff at the City Council meeting on
November 4, 2009. Copies of the meeting agenda are also located in this Attachment.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
196
Page 121 -60
City of Saratoga - Homepage
Low Graphics Version
Tucked away in the foothills of the
Santa Cruz Mountains, Saratoga is a
lovely residential community with a
small -town feel. The City is well known
for its excellent schools, fine dining,
unique shops, and distinctive cultural
institutions. Saratoga offers a high
quality of life to its residents and a
chance to escape the hustle of Silicon
Valley.
CITY NEWS
Seeking Your Input!
11/22/2010 The City of Saratoga is collaborating with Santa
Clara County to update our local hazard mitigation plan. This plan
outlines ways to increase our community's resiliency to natural
hazard events (earthquake, flood, wildfire, etc.).
Your feedback is critical to increasing local resiliency. Please take a
few moments to complete the brief survey by clicking on "More"
below. (The survey will be available online through Friday,
December 3, 2010)
Thank you for your participation!
More J
Holiday Toy and Food Drive
11/18/2010 Help those in need by donating to the City of
Saratoga's annual holiday toy and food drive. Barrels for toy
donations are located at the Saratoga City Manager's Office. Toys
should be new and unwrapped. Toys will be collected through
December 16, 2010 and given to Sacred Heart Community Service.
Food donations can be dropped off at City Hall, Joan Pisani J
Calendar I Site Map
F.A.Q.
Page 1 of 1
Search...
0
0
RESIDENTS
L J
BUSINESSES ►
L J
VISITORS �
L J
About The City What's New How Do I... Services City Hall Things To Do... City Council Contact Us Calendar Site Map F.A.Q.
197
bttp: / /www.saratoga.ca.us/ 11/22/2010
MINUTES
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER 4, 2009
The City Council of the City of Saratoga met in Closed Session in the Administrative
Conference Room at 5:30 p.m.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — Anticipated Litigation: Significant Exposure
to Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (b) (1 potential case)
CONFERENCE — INSTRUCTION TO REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Gov't Code
Section 54956.8): Wildwood Way
Agency Negotiators: Dave Anderson, City Manager and John Cherbone, Public Works
Director
MAYOR'S REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Page stated there was no reportable information.
City Council held a Joint Meeting with members of the Ministerial Association in the
Administrative Conference Room at 6:00 p.m.
Mayor Page called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Howard Miller, Jill Hunter, Vice Mayor Kathleen
King, Mayor Chuck Page
ABSENT: Susie Nagpal (Excused Absence)
ALSO Dave Anderson, City Manager
PRESENT: Richard Taylor, City Attorney
Barbara Powell, Assistant City Manager
Ann Sullivan, City Clerk
Mary Furey, Finance Director
John Cherbone, Public Works Director
John Livingstone, Community Development Director
Cynthia McCormick, Associate Planner
Kate Bear, City Arborist
REPORT OF CITY CLERK ON POSTING OF AGENDA
Ann Sullivan, City Clerk, reported that pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2,
the agenda for the meeting of November 4, 2009, was properly posted on October 29,
2009.
Im
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
The following people requested to speak:
Citizen Ray addressed the Council regarding the pollution from the Lehigh Cement Plant
in Cupertino. He stated he recently attended a meeting in Sacramento regarding this
concern.
Grover Steele addressed the Council regarding the October 13th article in the Saratoga
Newspaper about the proposed Community Garden by the Peck family and the potential
development of the West Valley Water District property bordering the Saratoga Creek; he
stated he does not support this proposal.
Naomi Matsumoto expressed her appreciation of the support shown by the City Council
for the West Valley Community Services program. She noted they have seen a 30%
increase in participation from a year ago from people who need their services. She added
they are having a difficult time keeping enough donated food items available for the
people who are in need and welcomed any and all donations.
Vice Mayor King asked if they had enough volunteers for serving food on Thanksgiving
Day.
Ms. Matsumoto noted they have enough servers lined up for that day; however they do
need volunteers to adopt seniors for the Adopt a Family Program for the holidays.
Vice Mayor King asked how people could get excess produce from their fruit and
vegetable trees to West Valley Community Services.
Ms. Matsumoto stated people could drop the excess produce off at the West Valley
Community Services office or they could call their office to schedule a time where they
could meet at the Los Gatos location to pick up the donated produce.
Janice Gamper addressed the Council regarding the discontinued public transportation
services for people that needed transportation services later in the evening and asked how
she could get transportation assistance for her and her father.
DIRECTION TO STAFF
Mayor Page suggested Ms. Gamper call 211 for transportation assistance.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
Reverend Eric Swanson from West Hope Presbyterian Church provided a brief report on
the Joint Meeting with the Ministerial Association prior to the Regular Council meeting.
He noted the association meets once a month and their goal is to continue networking
with the various communities of faith within Saratoga to build a community of peace.
They expressed an interest in working with the City to reach out together to build
community. Reverend Swanson invited all Saratoga communities of faith to participate
in the Thanksgiving Dinner Interfaith celebration on Thanksgiving Day at Congregation
Beth David. In addition, he invited everyone that would like to be more involved in the
2
199
community to visit their website at www.SaratogaServes.org — a program that was
enacted in 2008 that promotes service and good will in the Saratoga community.
Mayor Page took this opportunity to invite the members of the Ministerial Association
that were in attendance to join him on the Dais so that he could present them with a
proclamation declaring the month of November as "National Family Care Givers
Month ". Mayor Page read the proclamation and presented it to the members that were
present.
DIRECTION TO STAFF
None
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Vice Mayor King stated the Sister City 25th Anniversary celebrations will be starting this
week and invited everyone to help welcome the delegation from Muko Japan and to join
them in the tree planting event at the Warner Hutton House on Saturday. She added
people could call the city offices to obtain a schedule of events.
Councilmember Hunter noted there was an event for children scheduled at the Saratoga
Library on Saturday. Ms. Hunter also invited everyone to come to the annual Tree
Lighting Ceremony on November 27th — followed by the Village Open House events.
Mayor Page noted the City began their Sister City relationship with Muko, Japan twenty
five years ago; which includes a student exchange program. He added the Mayor from
Muko, Japan would be a member of the delegation scheduled to arrive on Thursday.
Vice Mayor King invited everyone to participate in the "Turkey Trot" competition in
downtown San Jose on the morning of Thanksgiving Day.
CEREMONIAL ITEMS
None
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
REVIEW OF ACCOUNTS PAYABLE REGISTERS
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council accepts the Check Registers for Accounts Payable cycles:
October 15, 2009
October 22, 2009
MILLER/HUNTER MOVED TO ACCEPT THE CHECK REGISTERS FOR
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CYCLES: OCTOBER 15, 2009 AND OCTOBER 22,
2009. MOTION PASSED 4 -0 -1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL ABSENT.
200
2. TREASURER'S REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Review and accept the Treasurer's Report for the month ended September 30, 2009.
MILLER /HUNTER MOVED TO ACCEPT THE TREASURER'S REPORT FOR
THE MONTH ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009. MOTION PASSED 4 -0 -IWITH
COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL ABSENT.
3. FINAL MAP APPROVAL FOR TWO LOTS LOCATED AT 15211 HUME
DRIVE
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Move to adopt Resolution granting final map approval of tentative map application
No. SUB 09 -0001 for two lots located at 15211 Hume Drive.
RESOLUTION NO. 09-056
MILLERMUNTER MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL
MAP APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE MAP APPLICATION NO. SUB 09 -0001
FOR TWO LOTS LOCATED AT 15211 HUME DRIVE. MOTION PASSED 4-
0-1WITH COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL ABSENT.
4. FY 2009 — 2010 CDBG COUNTY /CITY CONTRACT
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a $464,069.77 contract
with Santa Clara County for the FY 2009 -2010 CDBG Program.
RESOLUTION NO. 09-057
MILLER /HUNTER MOVED TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A $464,069.77 CONTRACT WITH
SANTA CLARA COUNTY FOR THE FY 2009/2010 CDBG PROGRAM.
MOTION PASSED 4 -0 -IWITH COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL ABSENT.
5. UPDATE OF SARATOGA'S LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
(LHMP) MATRICES PURSUANT TO THE DISASTER MITIGATION ACT
OF 2000
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the City Manager to submit the attached updated mitigation matrices to the
Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) for their preliminary review and comment.
MILLERMUNTER MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO
SUBMIT THE UPDATED MITIGATION MATRICES TO THE
ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS (ABAG) AND THE
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGAEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) FOR THEIR
PRELIMINARY REVIEW AND COMMENT. MOTION PASSED 4 -0 -IWITH
COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL ABSENT.
4
201
PUBLIC HEARINGS
6. APPEAL OF A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRP09- 0222).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission decision
denying the appeal and allowing the removal of four oak trees. The attached
resolution would make removal subject to all the Planning Commission conditions,
including a provision that work may not proceed if a court has determined that the
Applicant may not remove trees within the easement.
City Arborist Kate Bear presented the staff report regarding the appeal of a tree
removal permit on Via Regina Drive.
Max Keyashian, appellant, addressed the Council requesting that they deny the
Planning Commission's decision allowing the removal of four oak trees at 21818 Via
Regina.
Linda Yelavich, applicant, addressed the Council asking that they uphold the
Planning Commission's decision granting removal of four oak trees at 21818 Via
Regina.
Mayor Page opened the public hearing for comment.
No one requested to speak on this item.
Mayor Page closed the public hearing comment.
Mr. Kayeshian re- addressed the Council asking Council to deny the Planning
Commission's decision to allow removal of four oak trees at 21818 Via Regina.
Linda Yelavich re- addressed the Council asking Council to uphold the Planning
Commission's decision.
Councilmember Hunter noted she supported the appellant opposing the Planning
Commission's decision to allow the removal of four oak trees.
RESOLUTION NO. 09-058
MILLERXING MOVED TO UPHOLD THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S
DECISION APPROVING APPLICATION NO. TRP 09 -0222 FOR THE
REMOVAL OF FOUR COAST LIVE OAK TREES AT 21818 VIA REGINA;
AND TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION WHICH WOULD MAKE REMOVAL
SUBJECT TO ALL THE PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS,
INCLUDING A PROVISION THAT WORK MAY NOT PROCEED IF A
COURT HAS DETERMINED THAT THE APPLICANT MAY NOT REMOVE
TREES WITHIN THE EASEMENT. MOTION PASSED 3 -1 -1 WITH
COUNCILMEMBER HUNTER OPPOSING AND COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL
ABSENT.
5
202
OLD BUSINESS
7. HERRIMAN AVENUE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY AND BICYCLE LANE
19 oil I
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive report and provide direction to staff
Public Works Director John Cherbone presented the staff report.
Franziska Church and Sohrab Rashid, Traffic Engineers from Fehr & Peers, provided
additional data regarding pedestrian and bicycle lane options on Herriman Avenue
and noted they recommended Options 1 or 3.
Mayor Page invited public comment.
The following people requested to speak on this item:
Carl Dwjta stated option 3 was probably the most ideal for the majority of the
residents; however he was in support of Option 4.
Marilyn Foust stated a sidewalk was installed on a street that wasn't made to
accommodate a sidewalk. She noted she receives complaints from the postman and
noted she would like an option where there is a buffer and not to keep Herriman the
way it is now.
Minggui Pan noted he does not support Option 2 as it would benefit only one or two
residents and the chosen option should benefit the majority of the residents.
Bob Dimicco noted he supports Option 1.
Annette Cozimel stated she supports Option 4.
No one else requested to speak on this item.
Mayor Page closed the public comment.
KING/MILLER MOVED TO APPROVE OPTION 1: KEEP CURRENT
CONFIGURATION OF HERRIMAN AVENUE. CREATE RAISED
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY BY FILLING IN BETWEEN THE ASPHALT
BERM AND CONCRETE CURB. MOTION PASSED 3 -1 -1 WITH
COUNCILMEMBER HUNTER OPPOSING AND COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL
ABSENT.
NEW BUSINESS
8. STATUS OF JANUARY 6, 2010 COUNCIL MEETING
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
0
203
Consider cancelling the meeting of January 6, 2010.
City Clerk Ann Sullivan presented the staff report.
PAGE /KING MOVED TO CANCEL THE JANUARY 6, 2010 COUNCIL
MEETING. MOTION PASSED 4 -0 -1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL
ABSENT.
ADHOC & AGENCY ASSIGNMENT REPORTS
Mayor Chuck Page — reported:
Valley Transportation Authority PAC— meets Thursday evening and may vote on a
couple items: Reorganization of small city groupings — specifically whether or not to add
Milpitas to Sunnyvale and Santa Clara; and Governances — how the five small city
representatives are appointed to the board. He noted VTA may be looking at additional
employee layoffs due to the downturn in the economy and reduced ridership.
Vice Mayor Kathleen King — reported:
West Valley Flood Control Zone & Watershed Advisory Committee — suggested Council
reconsider this committee as they only schedule four meetings a year and feels the
meetings have not been very productive overall.
SSC Cities Association Executive Board — will meet next Thursday and noted the Cities
Association will have "California Forward" come in to talk about the future Initiatives,
such as the City of San Jose's efforts to ban plastic bags, CDC grants of $376 million
dollars that are available to the County Health Departments and only 40 grants will be
given out. These grants will be applied to improving access to community exercise
programs, quitting smoking, and general health plan coverage's. She reminded Council of
the annual Christmas Party on December 3, 2009.
Councilmember Jill Hunter — reported:
Thanked KSAR for always attending every city function and for interviewing people.
Library Joint Powers Association — she attended the County Library meeting and noted
they will be conducting a survey of people that do not have library cards; adding that only
45% of Saratogans have a library card. She stated their goal is to increase the number of
library cards and circulation as this is what determines how much funding the Saratoga
Library receives. She added Saratoga was recognized for their donation of $50K to the
library. She thanked the Friends of the Library group for their continued fund raising
efforts.
Santa Clara County Valley Water District Commission — she attended the last meeting;
they discussed the new changes that will be effective January 1, 2010 and stated the
District's goal is to have people cut back 20% in their water usage. She noted the County
in general has reduced water usage by 15 %.
Councilmember Howard Miller — reported: he attended the HTC Policy Committee
meeting as an alternate and noted there are two items Council will want to be aware of
regarding CDBG Grants. He stated the downturn in the economy has caused the County
to look for ways to minimize the cost of their programs. For 2011 the County will try to
limit the amount of administrative overhead for public service grants by considering
having fewer grants at a larger amount. In addition they are considering retaining about
7
204
$15,000 of administrative dollars that normally the City would use to administer the
programs to help fund their services.
Chamber of Commerce — has moved into their new office on Big Basin; facility is open
for business; and they expressed their appreciation to the city for waiving the CUP fee.
KSAR — is looking at spending some of the PEG capital dollars to purchase some video
editing stations.
Santa Clara County Emergency Council — will be attending the meeting on Thursday.
Council Finance Standing Committee — met earlier today and noted Council did receive
an updated Financial Report. He added the new computer software system is now able to
generate reports for current revenue and expense by quarter, versus by budget. He stated
expenses are below what was expected at this point — which is good; and revenue is
difficult to determine as it is very seasonal, e.g. property tax dollars, which will be
coming later in the fiscal year and those tax dollars are at where we expected them; and
the Building Department has been issuing a lot of building permits, however, due to the
economy not as many projects are coming in right now.
Councilmember Susie Nagpal — Excused Absence.
CITY COUNCIL ITEMS
Councilmember Miller noted the Boy Scouts of Troop 535 will be conducting their City-
wide E -Waste Recycling in January and would like to attend the first meeting in
December to provide additional information on this program.
Mayor Page stated Troop 535 members could speak during the Non - agendized portion of
the Council Agenda on December 2, 2009, and they could lead the Pledge of Allegiance.
Councilmember Hunter provided Council with copies of an article in the Saratoga News
15 years ago regarding trees and noted she would provide City Arborist Kate Bear with
one as well.
Mayor Page announced that as a result of the Joint Meeting held earlier with the Saratoga
Ministerial Association he would like to agendize the addition of a new Council
assignment for a council liaison to the Ministerial Association.
City Manager Dave Anderson reported that SASCC wanted to convey their appreciation
of the City's participation in the recent shredding of documents; they conducted a
successful Health Faire providing seasonal flu shots recently; and SASCC members are
in the process of selecting an investment advisor. Their investment committee is
conducting interviews to acquire a firm to assist SASCC with their portfolio.
Councilmember Hunter noted she will be attending future SASCC meeting and inquired
about the SASCC schedule.
City Manager Dave Anderson stated he would have Debbie Bretschneider contact her
regarding the SASCC meeting schedule.
City Attorney Richard Taylor noted he is unable to attend the November 18, 2009
Council meeting and Assistant City Attorney Jonathan Wittwer would be attending in his
absence.
205
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Dave Anderson noted he would like Council's permission to leave the state
during the week of Thanksgiving.
Council extended their approval for Mr. Anderson to leave the state during the week of
Thanksgiving.
Council Hunter noted Council members and staff were wearing white ribbons in honor of
Susie Nagpal and wished her a speedy recovery.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no additional business Mayor Page asked for a motion to adjourn.
KING /HUNTER MOVED TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING AT 9:25PM.
MOTION PASSED 4 -0 -1 WITH COUNCILMEMBER NAGPAL ABSENT.
Respectfully submitted,
Ann Sullivan, CMC
City Clerk
0
206
Bartshire, Corinne
From: Barbara Powell [bpowell @saratoga.ca.us]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 4:53 PM
To: Barbara Powell; Bartshire, Corinne
Subject: Clty of Saratoga Draft Hazard Mitigation Plan
Attachments: Saratoga Hazard Mitigation Plan Draft.pdf
Good afternoon,
Attached for your review and comments is the Draft Hazard Mitigation Plan for the City of Saratoga.
We appreciate your interest in disaster planning and preparedness and welcome your comments and suggestions.
Sincerely,
Barbara A. Powell
Assistant City Manager
City of Saratoga
(408) 868 -1215
207
City of Saratoga - Homepage
Low Graphics Version
Tucked away in the foothills of the
Santa Cruz Mountains, Saratoga is a
lovely residential community with a
small -town feel. The City is well known
for its excellent schools, fine dining,
unique shops, and distinctive cultural
institutions. Saratoga offers a high
quality of life to its residents and a
chance to escape the hustle of Silicon
Valley.
CITY NEWS
2011 Arbor Day - April 22 at 3:30 p.m.
4/13/2011 Celebrate Saratoga's trees this Arbor Day on April 22,
2011 at 3:30 p.m. in Foothill Park! Enjoy refreshments, live music,
help plant a tree, learn more about trees in your community, and
take home compost and a free sapling!
( Event Flyer )
More...
Saratoga Pet Parade - April 16, 2011
4/13/2011 Don't miss the Saratoga Pet Parade on Saturday, April
16th at the Saratoga Village Center! Center! Enter your pet in the contest,
win prizes, and enjoy the parade! The parade begins at 11:00 a.m.
Pet owners can enter the contest from 9:30 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. and
judging and awards will take place from 10:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m.
Early registration is available.
More
City's 2011 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 2011 Available for
Public Review and Comment
4/12/2011 The City of Saratoga has participated with Santa Clara
County in updating its Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. The purpose of
the plan is to review potential natural disasters (e.g. fire, flooding,
earthquake) that could occur in Saratoga and to identify strategies
that can be taken to lessen and /or eliminate impacts that
5
Calendar I Site Map
F.A.Q.
V `
W a
E
Page 1 of 1
Search...
0
RESIDENTS
L
BUSINESSES
L
VISITORS
L
About The City What's New How Do I... Services City Hall Things To Do... City Council Contact Us Calendar Site Map F.A.Q.
W
E
I
J
J
http://www.saratoga.ca.us/ 4/13/2011
City of Saratoga - News Details Page 1 of 1
Calendar I Site Map
Low Graphics Version
F.A.Q.
Search...
0
Things to do City Council
Homeoage > News > News Details _ €.- fitAILL ! plu'' 6
Return to Previous Page NEWS DETAILS
+
•,�. �
City's 2011 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 2011 Available for Public Review and Comment
The City of Saratoga has participated with Santa Clara County In updating Its Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. The purpose
tY 9 P P tY � P 9� 9 P P
of the plan is to review potential natural disasters (e.g. fire, flooding, earthquake) that could occur in Saratoga and to
identify strategies that can be taken to lessen and /or eliminate impacts that could happen if a disaster took place. The
plan also reviews City-owned facilities (e.g. buildings and park facilities) to determine whether they are vulnerable to
COAWIJN1TY EV
damage in the event of a natural disaster.
Ali
The review draft of the City of Saratoga Annex is now available for comment. Your comments and questions may be
directed to:
r
Barbara Powell, Assistant City Manager 408 - 868 -1215 or bpowell @saratoga.ca.us; or
CONTACT
Corinne Bartshire, at 415- 295 -7116 or cbartshire @dewberry.com
Thank you for your review and input!
( Local Hazard Mitigation Plan )
About The City What's New How Do I... Services City Hall Things To Do... City Council Contact Us Calendar Site Map F.A.Q.
209
http: / /www.saratoga.ca.us /news /displaynews .asp ?NewslD = 190 &Target1D =1 4/13/2011
21.7.2 Saratoga Attachment 2: Saratoga Strategies 2010
The City of Saratoga participated in ABAG's revision of the regional strategies for development of
this annex. Appendix G of Taming Natural Hazards presents a summary list of mitigation strategies
with regional priorities and the hazards mitigated. The City ranked those strategies in a spreadsheet
provided by ABAG. This is a summary of those rankings.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
210
Page 121 -62
Mitigation Strategies Identified for Saratoga
JURISDICTION: Saratoga
Page l of 1 l
Strategy Priority Responsible Agency or Department Comments
ECON -a -1 NYC
ECON -a -2 NYC
ECON -b -1 Existing Community Development Department
ECON -b -2 Existing Community Development Department Ord. 256 -2008 2007 California
Building Code
ECON -b -3
Existing
Community Development Department
ECON -b -4
Existing Underfunded Community Development Department
ECON -b -5
NYC
ECON -b -6
NYC
ECON -b -7
NYC
ECON -b -8
Moderate
Community Development Department
ECON -b -9
Under Study
ECON -c -1
Existing
Community Development Department
ECON -c -2
Existing
ECON -c -3 NYC
ECON -c -4 NYC
ECON -d -1 n/a
ECON -d -2 Existing
ECON -d -3 NYC
ECON -e -1 Existing Saratoga Fire Protection District &
Santa Clara County Fire Department
ECON -e -2 Existing Saratoga Fire Protection District &
Santa Clara County Fire Department
ECON -e -3 Existing Community Development Dept.,
Saratoga Fire Protection District &
Santa Clara County Fire Department
ECON -e -4 Existing Community Development Dept.,
Saratoga Fire Protection District &
Santa Clara County Fire Department
ECON -e -5 Existing Community Development Dept.,
Saratoga Fire Protection District &
Santa Clara County Fire Department
ECON -e -6 Existing Underfunded Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
ECON -e -7 Existing Underfunded Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
ECON -e -8 Existing Underfunded Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
ECON -e -9 n/a
ECON -e -10 Existing
ECON -e -11 Moderate
ECON -e -12 Existing
ECON -e -13 Existing Underfunded
ECON -f -1 Existing
ECON -f -2 Existing
Santa Clara Valley Water District
Community Dev. Department
211
All unreinforced masonry buildings in
Saratoga have been retrofitted.
These buildings do not currently exist
in Saratoga
Ord. 256 -2008 2007 California
Building Code
Ord. 256 -2008 2007 California
Building Code & 2007 California Fire
Code
Saratoga does not have any high -
rise /high- occupancy buildings.
http: / /www.abag.ca.gov /cgi- bin /dbhazard /strat20l O.pl 12/29/2010
Mitigation Strategies Identified for Saratoga
ECON -f -3
Existing
ECON -f -4
Existing
ECON -f -5
Existing
ECON -f -6
Existing
ECON -f -7
NYC
ECON -f -8
NYC
ECON -f -9
NYC
ECON -g -1
Existing
ECON -g -2
Existing Underfunded
ECON -h -1
Existing
ECON -h -2
Existing
ECON -h -3
Existing Underfunded
ECON -i -1
NYC
ECON -i -2
NYC
ECON -i -3
NYC
ECON -i -4
NYC
ECON -i -5
Moderate
ECON -i -6
Existing Underfunded
ECON-i -1
Existing
ECON-i -2
Existing Underfunded
ECON-i -3
NYC
ECON -0-4
Existing Underfunded
ECON-i -5
Existing Underfunded
ECON-i -6
Existing Underfunded
ECON-i -7
Existing
ECON -0-8
Existing
Community Development Department
Public Works Department
Public Works Department
Public Works Department Ord. 71 -167
Community Development Department Ord. 71 -193 & 215 -2002
Page 2 of 1 l
Community Development Department Ord. 256 -2008 2007 California
Building Code
Community Development Department
Community Development Department
Public Works Department
ECON -i -9 Existing Underfunded Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
ECON-i -10
NYC
ECON -i -11
n/a
ECON-i -12
n/a
ECON-i -13
Existing
EDUC -a -1
n/a
EDUC -a -2
n/a
EDUC -a -3
n/a
EDUC -a -4
n/a
EDUC -a -5
n/a
EDUC -a -6
Existing Underfunded
EDUC -b -1
Existing
EDUC -b -2
Existing
Admin. /Emerg. Prep.; Santa Clara
County Fire Department
School Districts (Saratoga is served
by several)
School Districts (Saratoga is served
by several)
School Districts (Saratoga is served
by several)
School Districts (Saratoga is served
by several)
School Districts (Saratoga is served
by several)
212
The City maintains our own storm
drain system.
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we are not the lead
in its implementation.
The City is a separate entity from the
school districts.
The City is a separate entity from the
school districts.
The City is a separate entity from the
school districts.
The City is a separate entity from the
school districts.
The City is a separate entity from the
school districts.
http: / /www.abag.ca.gov /cgi- bin /dbhazard /strat20l O.pl 12/29/2010
Mitigation Strategies Identified for Saratoga Page 3 of 11
EDUC -b -3
Existing
Community Development Department
ENV] -a -4
EDUC -c -1
Existing
ENVI -a -5
n/a
EDUC -c -2
Existing
Existing
Community Development & Public
EDUC -c -3
NYC
Works Departments
ENVI -a -7
EDUC -c -4
NYC
EDUC -c -5
Existing
n/a
EDUC -c -6
n/a
School Districts (Saratoga is served
The City is a separate entity from the
Santa Clara County Fire Department
by several)
school districts.
EDUC -c -7
NYC
Existing
Facilities Division
EDUC -d -1
NYC
Saratoga Fire Protection District &
EDUC -d -2
NYC
ENVI -a -13
Existing Underfunded
ENV] -a -1
Existing
Community Development Department
ENVI -a -2
Existing
The City contracts with the Sheriff and
Existing Underfunded
ENVI -b -4
works with Fire agencies on these
ENVI -b -5
Existing Underfunded
strategies.
ENVI -a -3
Existing
Community Development Department
ENV] -a -4
Under Study
ENVI -a -5
n/a
Santa Clara Valley Water District
ENVI -a -6
Existing
Community Development & Public
Works Departments
ENVI -a -7
Existing
Community Development & Public
Works Departments
ENVI -a -8
n/a
ENVI -a -9
Existing
Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
ENVI -a -10
Existing
ENV[ -a -11
Existing
Facilities Division
ENVI -a -12
Existing Underfunded
Saratoga Fire Protection District &
Santa Clara County Fire Department
ENVI -a -13
Existing Underfunded
Santa Clara Valley Water District
ENVI -b -1
Existing
ENVI -b -2
Existing Underfunded
ENVI -b -3
Existing Underfunded
ENVI -b -4
Existing Underfunded
ENVI -b -5
Existing Underfunded
ENVI -b -6
Existing Underfunded
ENVI -b -7
Existing Underfunded
ENVI -b -8
Existing Underfunded
ENVI -b -9
Existing Underfunded
ENVI -b -10
Existing Underfunded
ENVI -b -11
Existing Underfunded
ENVI -b -12
Existing Underfunded
ENVI -b -13
Existing Underfunded
ENVI -c -1
Moderate
ENV]-c-2
n/a
ENVI -c -3
n/a
GOVT -a -1
Existing Underfunded
Facilities Division
GOVT -a -2
Existing Underfunded
Facilities Division
GOVT -a -3
Existing
213
http: / /www.abag.ca.gov /cgi- bin /dbhazard /strat20l O.pl 12/29/2010
Mitigation Strategies Identified for Saratoga
GOVT -a -4 Existing Underfunded Facilities Division
GOVT -a -5 Existing
GOVT -a -6 NYC
GOVT -a -7 Moderate
GOVT -a -8 n/a
GOVT -a -9 Existing
GOVT -a -10 Existing
GOVT -a -11 Existing
GOVT -a -12 Existing
GOVT -a -13 Existing
Information Technology Division
Facilities Division
Facilities Division
Community Development Department
Community Development Department
Facilities Division
Community Development Department
GOVT -b -1 Existing Emergency Preparedness
Coordinator, City Manager's Office
GOVT -b -2 Existing Underfunded Emergency Preparedness
Coordinator, City Manager's Office
GOVT -b -3 Existing
GOVT -b -4 Existing Underfunded Information Technology Division &
Emergency Preparedness
Coordinator
GOVT -b -5 Existing Underfunded
GOVT -c -1
Existing Emergency Preparedness
Coordinator
GOVT -c -2
Existing Emergency Preparedness
Coordinator
GOVT -c -3
Existing Underfunded Emergency Preparedness
Coordinator
GOVT -c -4
Existing Saratoga Fire Protection District &
Santa Clara County Fire Department
GOVT -c -5
Existing Saratoga Fire Prot. Dist., Santa Clara
County Fire Dept., & Sheriff's Office
GOVT -c -6
Existing Underfunded Saratoga Fire Prot. Dist., Santa Clara
County Fire Dept., & Sheriff's Office
GOVT -c -7 Existing Underfunded
GOVT -c -8 Existing Underfunded
GOVT -c -9 NYC
GOVT -c -10 Existing Underfunded
GOVT -c -11 Existing Underfunded
GOVT -c -12 Existing
GOVT -c -13 Existing
GOVT -c -14 NYC
GOVT -c -15 NYC
GOVT -c -16 Existing
GOVT -c -17 Existing
GOVT -c -18 n/a
Public Works Department
Community Development Department
Saratoga Fire, Santa Clara County
Fire, Sheriffs Office
GOVT -c -19 Existing Underfunded Sheriff's Office
GOVT -c -20 Existing Underfunded Santa Clara Valley Water District
GOVT -c -21 n/a
214
Page 4 of 1 l
The City does not own any dams.
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have the
lead in its implementation.
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have the
lead in its implementation.
http: / /www.abag.ca.gov /cgi- bin /dbhazard /strat20l O.pl 12/29/2010
Mitigation Strategies Identified for Saratoga
GOVT -c -22 Existing
GOVT -c -23 Existing
GOVT -c -24 n/a
GOVT -c -25 Existing Underfunded
GOVT -d -1 Existing
Santa Clara Valley Water District
GOVT -d -2
Existing
GOVT -d -3
Very High Santa Clara Valley Water District
GOVT -d -4
Existing Santa Clara Valley Water District
GOVT -d -5
Existing
GOVT -d -6
Existing Underfunded Saratoga Fire Protection District &
n/a
Santa Clara County Fire Department
GOVT -d -7 n/a
GOVT -d -8
Existing
HEAL -b -2
GOVT -d -9
Existing Underfunded
High
GOVT -d -10 NYC
Existing
GOVT -e -1
Existing Underfunded
n/a
GOVT -e -2
Existing Underfunded
n/a
HEAL -a -1
Existing Underfunded
Community Development
HEAL -c -5
Departrment
HEAL -a -2
n/a
Santa Clara County Public Health
HSNG -a -1
Department
HEAL -a -3
Existing
Santa Clara County Public Health
Department
HEAL -a -4
Existing
Santa Clara County Public Health
Department
HEAL -a -5
Existing Underfunded
Santa Clara County Public Health
Department
HEAL -a -6
n/a
Santa Clara County Public Health
Department
HEAL -a -7
n/a
Santa Clara County Public Health
Department
HEAL -b -1
High
HEAL -b -2
High
HEAL -b -3
High
HEAL -c -1
Existing
HEAL -c -2
n/a
HEAL -c -3
n/a
HEAL -c -4
n/a
HEAL -c -5
n/a
HEAL -c -6
n/a
HSNG -a -1
NYC
HSNG -a -2
NYC
Santa Clara County Public Health
Department
Santa Clara County OES; Santa Clara
County Fire Department
Santa Clara County OES; Santa clara
County Public Health Department
Santa Clara County Public Health
Department
Santa Clara County Environmental
Health Department
Santa Clara County Environmental
Health Department
215
Page 5 of 11
Participation in Santa Clara County
Emergency Managers Association
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have the
lead in its implementation.
The City is working with the Health
Department to implement this strategy.
http: / /www.abag.ca.gov /cgi- bin /dbhazard /strat20l O.pl 12/29/2010
Mitigation Strategies Identified for Saratoga Page 6 of 11
HSNG -a -3 Existing
HSNG -a -4 Under Study
HSNG -b -1
Existing
Community Development Department
There are no mobile homes in
HSNG -b -2
Existing
Community Development Department
Saratoga.
HSNG -b -3
Existing
Community Development Department
These categories of structures do not
HSNG -b -4
Existing
Community Development Department
currently exist in Saratoga.
HSNG -b -5
Existing
Community Development Department
Ord. 256 -2008 2007 California
HSNG -b -6
n/a
The City is in agreement with this
HSNG -e -4
NYC
strategy; however, we do not have the
HSNG -f -1
Existing
Community Development Department
lead role in its implementation.
HSNG -b -7
Existing Underfunded
Building Code
HSNG -b -8
n/a
Community Development Department
The City is in agreement with this
HSNG -g -1
Existing
Saratoga Fire Protection District &
strategy; however, we do not have the
Santa Clara County Fire Department
lead role in its implementation.
HSNG -b -9
n/a
Saratoga Fire Protection District &
HSNG -c -1
Existing
Community Development Department
HSNG -c -2
Existing
Community Development Department
Ord. 256 -2008 2007 California
Saratoga Fire Protection District &
Building Code
HSNG -c -3
Existing
Community Development Department
Code
HSNG -c -4
Existing Underfunded
Community Development Department
HSNG -c -5
NYC
Community Development Department
HSNG -c -6
NYC
Community Dev. Dept., Saratoga Fire
Ord. 256 -2008 2007 California
HSNG -c -7
NYC
Protection District & Santa Clara
Building Code & 2007 California Fire
HSNG -c -8
Moderate
HSNG -c -9
Under Study
HSNG -d -1
Existing
HSNG -d -2
Existing
All unreinforced masonry buildings in
Saratoga have been retrofitted
HSNG -d -3 NYC
HSNG -d -4 NYC
HSNG -e -1
n/a
There are no mobile homes in
Saratoga.
HSNG -e -2
n/a
These categories of structures do not
currently exist in Saratoga.
HSNG -e -3
Existing
Ord. 256 -2008 2007 California
Building Code
HSNG -e -4
NYC
HSNG -f -1
Existing
Community Development Department
Ord. 256 -2008 2007 California
Building Code
HSNG -f -2
Existing
Community Development Department
HSNG -g -1
Existing
Saratoga Fire Protection District &
Santa Clara County Fire Department
HSNG -g -2
Existing
Saratoga Fire Protection District &
Santa Clara County Fire Department
HSNG -g -3
Existing
Community Development Dept.,
Ord. 256 -2008 2007 California
Saratoga Fire Protection District &
Building Code & 2007 California Fire
Santa Clara County Fire Department
Code
HSNG -g -4
Moderate
HSNG -g -5
Existing
Community Development Department
HSNG -g -6
Existing
Community Dev. Dept., Saratoga Fire
Ord. 256 -2008 2007 California
Protection District & Santa Clara
Building Code & 2007 California Fire
216
http:// www. abag. ca .gov /cgi- bin/dbhazard /strat20l O.pl 12/29/2010
Mitigation Strategies Identified for Saratoga
County Fire Department
HSNG -g -7 Existing Community Development Dept.,
Saratoga Fire Protection District &
Santa Clara County Fire Department
HSNG -g -8 Existing Underfunded Saratoga Fire, Santa Clara County
Fire, SC Valley Water District
HSNG -q -9 Existing Underfunded Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Claa County Fire Department
HSNG -g -10 Existing Underfunded Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
HSNG -q -11 Existing Underfunded Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
HSNG -g -12 Existing Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
Page 7 of 11
Code
Ord. 256 -2008 2007 California
Building Code & 2007 California Fire
Code
HSNG -g -13 Existing Saratoga Fire Protection District and Ord. 256 -2008 2007 California
Santa Clara County Fire Department Building Code & 2007 California Fire
Code
HSNG -q -14 Existing
Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Ord. 256 -2008 2007 California
Existing
Santa Clara County Fire Department
Building Code & 2007 California Fire
HSNG -h -3
Existing
Code
HSNG -g -15 n/a
HSNG -h -5
Saratoga does not have any high -
HSNG -h -6
Existing
rise /high- occupancy buildings.
HSNG -g -16 Existing
HSNG -h -8
NYC
HSNG -g -17 Existing Underfunded Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Moderate
HSNG -h -10 NYC
Santa Clara County Fire Department
Existing
HSNG -g -18 Existing
Community Development Department
Ord. 256 -2008 2007 California
Moderate
HSNG-I -2
Building Code & 2007 California Fire
HSNG -k -1
Existing
Code
HSNG -g -19 Moderate
HSNG -g -20 Existing Underfunded
HSNG -h -1
Existing
HSNG -h -2
Existing
HSNG -h -3
Existing
HSNG -h -4
Existing
HSNG -h -5
Existing
HSNG -h -6
Existing
HSNG -h -7
Existing
HSNG -h -8
NYC
HSNG -h -9
Moderate
HSNG -h -10 NYC
HSNG -i -1
Existing
HSNG -i -2
Existing Underfunded
HSNG -0-1
Moderate
HSNG-I -2
NYC
HSNG -k -1
Existing
HSNG -k -2
Existing Underfunded
HSNG -k -3
Existing
HSNG -k -4
n/a
HSNG -k -5 Existing
Santa Clara Valley Water District
Community Dev. Department
Community Development Department
Public Works Department
Public Works Department
Public Works Department
Public Works Department
Ord. 71 -167
Ord. 71 -167
Community Development Department Ord 71 -193 & Ord. 215 -2002
Communitiy Development Department
Community Development Department
Community Development Department
217
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we are not the lead
in its implementation.
http: / /www.abag.ca.gov /cgi- bin /dbhazard /strat20l O.pl 12/29/2010
Mitigation Strategies Identified for Saratoga Page 8 of I1
HSNG -k -6 Existing Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
HSNG -k -7 Existing Underfunded
HSNG -k -8 Existing Underfunded Santa Clara County Sheriffs Office
HSNG -k -9 Existing Underfunded Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
HSNG -k -10 Existing Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
HSNG -k -11 NYC
HSNG -k -12 Existing
HSNG -k -13 Existing Public Works Department
HSNG -k -14 Existing Underfunded Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
HSNG -k -15 n/a
HSNG -k -16 Existing
Admin., Emergency Preparedness;
Public Works Department
INFR -a -12
Santa Clara County Fire Department
Public Works Department
INFR -a -1
n/a
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have a
strategy; however, we do not have a
lead role in its implementation.
INFR -a -13
n/a
lead role in its implementation.
INFR -a -2
n/a
Existing
The City does not own any dams.
INFR -a -3
Existing
Public Works Department
Preparedness Coordinator
INFR -a -4
Existing Underfunded Public Works Department
Existing
INFR -a -5
Existing
Public Works Department
INFR -a -6
n/a
INFR -a -16
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have a
INFR -a -17
n/a
lead role in its implementation.
INFR -a -7 Existing Public Works Department
INFR -a -8 Existing Underfunded Facilities Division
INFR -a -9 Existing Underfunded Public Works Department
INFR -a -10 Existing Underfunded Public Works Department
INFR -a -11
n/a
Public Works Department
INFR -a -12
Existing
Public Works Department
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have a
lead role in its implementation.
INFR -a -13
n/a
The City does not own any dams.
INFR -a -14
Existing
City Manager's Office; Emergency
Preparedness Coordinator
INFR -a -15
Existing
Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
INFR -a -16
Existing Underfunded City Manager's Office; Emergency
Preparedness Coordinator
INFR -a -17
n/a
MTC
INFR -a -18
n/a
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have a
lead role in its implementation.
INFR -a -19
n/a
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have a
lead role in its implementation.
INFR -a -20
n/a
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have a
lead role in its implementation.
INFR -a -21
Existing Underfunded City Manager's Office; Emergency
218
http: / /www.abag.ca.gov /cgi- bin /dbhazard /strat2010.pl 12/29/2010
Mitigation Strategies Identified for Saratoga
INFR -a -22
NYC
INFR -b -1
Existing
INFR -b -2
Existing Underfunded
INFR -b -3
n/a
INFR -b -4 n/a
INFR -b -5 n/a
INFR -b -6 n/a
INFR -b -7 n/a
INFR -b -8 Existing
INFR -b -9 NYC
INFR -b -10 n/a
Preparedness Coordinator
Public Works Department
Public Works Department & Facilities
Division
INFR -c -1 Existing Underfunded Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
INFR -c -2 Existing Underfunded Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
INFR -c -3 Existing Underfunded Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
INFR -c -4 Existing Public Works Department
INFR -c -5 Existing Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
INFR -c -6 Existing Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
INFR -c -7 Existing SFPD and SCCFD
INFR -c -8 Existing Underfunded Public Works Department
INFR -d -1 Existing Underfunded Santa Clara Valley Water District
INFR -d -2 Existing Underfunded Santa Clara Valley Water District
INFR -d -3 Existing Underfunded Santa Clara Valley Water District
INFR -d -4 Existing Public Works Department
INFRA-5 Existing Underfunded Santa Clara Valley Water District
INFRA-6 Existing Underfunded Public Works Department
INFRA-7 Existing Underfunded Public Works Department
INFRA-8 Existing Underfunded Public Works Department
INFRA-9 Existing Underfunded Santa Clara Valley Water District
INFRA-10 n/a Santa Clara Valley Water District
INFR -d -11 Existing Underfunded Public Works Department
INFRA-12 n/a
219
Page 9 of 1 l
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have a
lead role in its implementation.
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have a
lead role in its implementation.
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have a
lead role in its implementation.
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have a
lead role in its implementation.
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have a
lead role in its implementation.
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have a
lead role in its implementation.
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have a
lead role in its implementation.
http: / /www.abag.ca.gov /cgi- bin /dbhazard /strat20l O.pl 12/29/2010
Mitigation Strategies Identified for Saratoga
INFR -d -13 Existing Public Works Department
INFR -d -14 n/a
INFR -d -15
I N FR -d -16
INFR -d -17
INFR -d -18
I N FR -e -1
I N FR -e -2
I N FR -f -1
INFR -g -1
I N F R -g -2
I N FR -g-3
I N F R -g -4
I N FR -g -5
I N F R -q -6
I N FR -q -7
LAND -a -1
LAND-a-2
LAND-a-3
LAND-a-4
LAND-a-5
LAND-a-6
LAND-a-7
LAND-a-8
LAND -b -1
LAND-b-2
LAND -c -1
LAND-c-2
LAND-c-3
LAND-c-4
LAND-c-5
LAND-c-6
LAND -d -1
LAND-d-2
LAND-d-3
LAND -d -4
LAND-d-5
LAND -e -1
LAND-e-2
LAND -f -1
LAND-f-2
Existing Underfunded Public Works Department
Page 10 of 11
The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have a
lead role in its implementation.
Existing Public Works Department
n/a Santa Clara Valley Water District
n/a Santa Clara Valley Water District
n/a
Existing Community Development Department Ord. 71 -113
n/a The City is in agreement with this
strategy; however, we do not have a
lead role in its implementation.
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
NYC
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Under Study
Under Study
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Very High
Very High
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
n/a
n/a
City Manager's Office, Emergency
Preparedness Coordinator
Community Development Department Ord. 221 -2003
Community Development Department Ord. 221 -2003
Community Development Department
Community Development Department
Community Development Department
Community Development Department Municipal Code Section 16- 65.040
Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
Saratoga Fire Protection District and
Santa Clara County Fire Department
Community Development Department Ord. 71 -167
Public Works Department
Public Works Department
Public Works Department Ord. 71 -167
Community Development Department Ord
Community Development Department
Community Development Department Ord
Community Development and Public
Works Departments
Community Development Department Ord
Community Development Department
Community Development Department
220
71 -193 & Ord. 215 -2002
71 -193 & Ord. 215 -2002
71 -113
http: / /www.abag.ca.gov /cgi- bin /dbhazard /strat2010.pl 12/29/2010
Mitigation Strategies Identified for Saratoga
LAND -f -3
Existing
LAND -f -4
NYC
LAND -f -5
n/a
LAND -Q -1
n/a
Source: Association of Bay Area Governments, 2009.
221
Page 11 of 11
http: / /www.abag.ca.gov /cgi- bin /dbhazard /strat20l O.pl 12/29/2010
21.7.3 Saratoga Attachment 3: Saratoga Exposure Analysis
This list includes all information on Saratoga's critical facilities and identifies which of the City's
critical facilities are located in the mapped hazard areas.
Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan
March 29, 2012
222
Page 121 -64
City of Saratoga
Exposure Analysis
ID
Critical Facility
Address
Type
Occupancy
Own/Lease
Structure Type
15
MUSEUM
20450 SARATOGA AVE
N/A
N/A
own
Light wood -frame building <= 5,000 SQFT
9
CONCESSION /RSTRM
12970 GLEN BRAE DR
N/A
N/A
own
Reinforced masonry with rigid floor and roof
6
PRK /RSTRM /SNKBR
12970 GLEN BRAE DR
N/A
N/A
own
Light wood -frame building <= 5,000 SQFT
2
RESTROOM
20764 FOURTH ST
N/A
N/A
own
Reinforced masonry with rigid floor and roof
11
MODULAR A
13777 FRUITVALE AVE
N/A
N/A
own
Light wood -frame building <= 5,000 SQFT
12
WARNER HUTN BLDG
13777 FRUITVALE AVE
N/A
N/A
own
Light wood -frame building <= 5,000 SQFT
13
CITY HALL /NEW WING
13777 FRUITVALE AVE
N/A
N/A
own
Wood -frame building > 5,000 SQFT
14
THEATER
13777 FRUITVALE AVE
N/A
N/A
own
Wood -frame building > 5,000 SQFT
7
CONG SPR STRG
12970 GLEN BRAE DR
N/A
N/A
own
Light wood -frame building <= 5,000 SQFT
8
CONGSPR SCRKEEP
12970 GLEN BRAE DR
N/A
N/A
own
Light wood -frame building <= 5,000 SQFT
26
N. CAMPUS FELLOWSHIP
19848 PROSPECT ROAD
N/A
N/A
own
Wood -frame building > 5,000 SQFT
25
N. CAMPUS ADMIN BLDNG
19848 PROSPECT ROAD
N/A
N/A
own
Light wood -frame building — 5,000 SQFT
19
CARETAKER CTAGE
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
N/A
N/A
own
Light wood -frame building — 5,000 SQFT
20
PUMPHOUSE
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
N/A
N/A
own
Light wood -frame building <= 5,000 SQFT
23
CULTURAL EXCHANG
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
N/A
N/A
own
Light wood -frame building — 5,000 SQFT
24
HAKONE PK OFFICE
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
N/A
N/A
own
Light wood -frame building — 5,000 SQFT
16
MAIN HOUSE /PARK
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
N/A
N/A
own
Light wood -frame building — 5,000 SQFT
17
GRDN PRK /EXHIBIT
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
N/A
N/A
own
Light wood -frame building — 5,000 SQFT
3
COMMUNITY CNTR
19655 ALLENDALE AVE
N/A
N/A
own
Wood -frame building > 5,000 SQFT
41
CORP YARD
19700 ALLENDALE AVE
N/A
N/A
own
Light metal frame
18
RESTROOM
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
N/A
N/A
own
Light wood -frame building — 5,000 SQFT
21
STORAGE BLDG
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
N/A
N/A
own
Light wood -frame building <= 5,000 SQFT
22
GARAGE /GIFT SHOP
21000 BIG BASIN WAY
N/A
N/A
own
Light wood -frame building <= 5,000 SQFT
1
OLD LIBRARY
14410 OAK STREET
N/A
N/A
own
Light wood -frame building — 5,000 SQFT
10
CITY HALL
13777 FRUITVALE AVE
N/A
N/A
own
Wood -frame building > 5,000 SQFT
5
LIBRARY
13650 SARATOGA AVE
N/A
N/A
own
Wood -frame building > 5,000 SQFT
27
ID
15
FIRE STATION / ADMIN OFF.
Critical Facility
MUSEUM
14380 SARATOGA AVE
Structure Information
N/A
N/A
Irregularities-Plan View
Regular
128
Irregularities-
Vertical
Regular
lown
Structural
Assessment
N/A
Reinforced masonry with flexible floor and roof
Retrofit
no
9
CONCESSION /RSTRM
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
6
PRK /RSTRM /SNKBR
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
2
RESTROOM
N/A
Regular
Regular
no
no
11
MODULAR A
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
12
WARNER HUTN BLDG
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
13
CITY HALL /NEW WING
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
yes
14
THEATER
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
7
CONG SPR STRG
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
8
CONGSPR SCRKEEP
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
Pag223
City of Saratoga
Exposure Analysis
ID
26
Critical Facility
N. CAMPUS FELLOWSHIP
Structure Information
Irregularities-Plan View
Irregular
Irregularities-
Vertical
Regular
Structural
Assessment
N/A
Retrofit
no
N/A
25
N. CAMPUS ADMIN BLDNG
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
19
CARETAKER CTAGE
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
20
PUMPHOUSE
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
23
CULTURAL EXCHANG
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
24
HAKONE PK OFFICE
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
16
MAIN HOUSE /PARK
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
17
GRDN PRK /EXHIBIT
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
3
COMMUNITY CNTR
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
yes
4
CORP YARD
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
181
RESTROOM
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
21
STORAGE BLDG
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
22
GARAGE /GIFT SHOP
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
no
1
OLD LIBRARY
N/A
Regular
Regular
no
no
10
CITY HALL
N/A
Regular
Regular
N/A
yes
5
LIBRARY
RENOVATED IN 2003
Regular
Regular
N/A
yes
27
ID
FIRE STATION /ADMIN OFF.
Critical Facility
open,different size floors,4
door fire apparatus parking
Anchored Equipment
Irregular
Alternate Power
Irregular
Sprinklers
No- new
construction
Roof Material
no
Year Built
15
MUSEUM
no
no
no
wood shakes
1920
9
CONCESSION /RSTRM
no
N/A
N/A
N/A
1970
6
PRK /RSTRM /SNKBR
yes
N/A
N/A
N/A
1986
2
RESTROOM
no
no
no
N/A
1972
11
MODULAR A
yes
no
no
N/A
1998
12
WARNER HUTN BLDG
yes
no
no
comp.
1900
13
CITY HALL /NEW WING
yes
yes
no
built -up
1992
14
THEATER
yes
yes
no
built -up
1964
7
CONG SPR STRG
no
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
8
CONGSPR SCRKEEP
no
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
26
N. CAMPUS FELLOWSHIP
no
no
no
cement tile
1971
25
N. CAMPUS ADMIN BLDNG
no
no
no
comp.
1963
19
CARETAKER CTAGE
no
no
no
N/A
1923
20
PUMPHOUSE
no
no
no
N/A
1960
23
CULTURAL EXCHANG
yes
no
no
wood shakes
1990
24
HAKONE PK OFFICE
no
no
no
N/A
1920
16
MAIN HOUSE /PARK
no
no
no
N/A
1917
17
GRDN PRK /EXHIBIT
no
no
no
N/A
1990
3
COMMUNITY CNTR
yes
no
yes
built -up
1968
Pa9224
City of Saratoga
Exposure Analysis
ID
Critical Facility
Anchored Equipment
Alternate Power
Sprinklers
Roof Material
Year Built
4
CORP YARD
yes
yes
no
metal
1972
18
RESTROOM
no
no
no
N/A
1920
21
STORAGE BLDG
no
no
no
N/A
1940
22
GARAGE /GIFT SHOP
no
no
no
N/A
1920
1
OLD LIBRARY
no
no
no
tile
1927
10
CITY HALL
yes
yes
no
built -up
1970
5
LIBRARY
yes
yes
yes
wood (fire ret.)
2003
27
ID
15
FIRE STATION /ADMIN OFF.
Critical Facility
MUSEUM
yes
Stories
1
yes
Capacity
1245
yes
Bldg Insured
Value
222000
80% tile /20% tar
Contents Insured
Value
0
2004
9
CONCESSION /RSTRM
1
1158
110853
0
6
PRK /RSTRM /SNKBR
0
540
158760
0
2
RESTROOM
1
339
36383
0
11
MODULAR A
1
1440
30000
0
12
WARNER HUTN BLDG
1
1838
369000
0
13
CITY HALL /NEW WING
1
4995
1035729
340673
14
THEATER
1
7436
0
0
7
CONG SPR STRG
0
0
23814
0
8
CONGSPR SCRKEEP
0
0
16758
0
26
N. CAMPUS FELLOWSHIP
N/A
N/A
25
N. CAMPUS ADMIN BLDNG
N/A
N/A
19
CARETAKER CTAGE
1
878
195000
0
20
PUMPHOUSE
1
120
7938
0
23
CULTURAL EXCHANG
1
2251
1164578
0
24
HAKONE PK OFFICE
1
336
30165
0
16
MAIN HOUSE /PARK
1
695
185220
5513
17
GRDN PRK /EXHIBIT
1
1485
267908
4961
3
COMMUNITY CNTR
1
18425
3308565
233730
4
CORP YARD
1
11424
595000
37486
18
RESTROOM
1
336
39690
0
21
STORAGE BLDG
0
336
13561
0
22
GARAGE /GIFT SHOP
1
640
13561
0
1
OLD LIBRARY
1
1816
368150
0
10
CITY HALL
1
7057
2694621
340674
5
LIBRARY
1
19585
2369417
0
27
ID
15
FIRE STATION /ADMIN OFF.
Critical Facility
MUSEUM
2
# of Dams
0
13158
Wildland-Urban Interface Fire
Threat
Outside WUI hazard area
6000000
Wildfire Threat
I Moderate
250000
FEMA Flood
Zone
Undetermined
Tsunami
Not Affected
Pa9225
City of Saratoga
Exposure Analysis
ID
9
Critical Facility
CONCESSION /RSTRM
# of Dams
0
Wildiand-Urban Interface Fire
Threat
Outside WUI hazard area
Wildfire Threat
Moderate
FEIVIA Flood
Zone
500 Year
Tsunami
Not Affected
6
PRK /RSTRM /SNKBR
0
Outside WUI hazard area
Moderate
500 Year
Not Affected
2
RESTROOM
0
Fire - threatened area
Moderate
500 Year
Not Affected
11
MODULAR A
0
Fire - threatened area
Moderate
100 Year
Not Affected
12
WARNER HUTN BLDG
0
Fire - threatened area
Moderate
100 Year
Not Affected
13
CITY HALL /NEW WING
0
Fire - threatened area
Moderate
100 Year
Not Affected
14
THEATER
0
Fire - threatened area
Moderate
100 Year
Not Affected
7
CONG SPR STRG
0
Outside WUI hazard area
Moderate
500 Year
Not Affected
8
CONGSPR SCRKEEP
0
Outside WUI hazard area
Moderate
500 Year
Not Affected
261N.
CAMPUS FELLOWSHIP
0
Outside WUI hazard area
Moderate
500 Year
Not Affected
25
N. CAMPUS ADMIN BLDNG
0
Outside WUI hazard area
Moderate
500 Year
Not Affected
19
CARETAKER CTAGE
0
Fire - threatened area
Moderate
100 Year
Not Affected
20
PUMPHOUSE
0
Fire - threatened area
Moderate
100 Year
Not Affected
23
CULTURAL EXCHANG
0
Fire - threatened area
Moderate
100 Year
Not Affected
24
HAKONE PK OFFICE
0
Fire - threatened area
Moderate
100 Year
Not Affected
16
MAIN HOUSE /PARK
0
Fire - threatened area
Moderate
100 Year
Not Affected
17
GRDN PRK /EXHIBIT
0
Fire - threatened area
Moderate
100 Year
Not Affected
3
COMMUNITY CNTR
0
Fire - threatened area
Moderate
500 Year
Not Affected
4
CORP YARD
0
Fire - threatened area
Moderate
500 Year
Not Affected
181
RESTROOM
0
Fire - threatened area
Moderate
100 Year
Not Affected
21
STORAGE BLDG
0
Fire - threatened area
Moderate
100 Year
Not Affected
22
GARAGE /GIFT SHOP
0
Fire - threatened area
Moderate
100 Year
Not Affected
1
OLD LIBRARY
0
Fire - threatened area
Moderate
500 Year
Not Affected
10
CITY HALL
0
Outside WUI hazard area
Moderate
100 Year
Not Affected
5
LIBRARY
0
Outside WUI hazard area
Moderate
100 Year
Not Affected
27
ID
15
FIRE STATION / ADMIN OFF.
Critical Facility
MUSEUM
0
Existing Landslide Areas
Surficial Deposits
Fire - threatened area
EQ-Induced Landslides
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
Moderate
EQ Shake
•.
55
500 Year
Liquefaction
Moderate
Not Affected
EQ-Induced Liquefaction
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
9
CONCESSION /RSTRM
Surficial Deposits
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
75
Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
6
PRK /RSTRM /SNKBR
Surficial Deposits
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
75
Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
2
RESTROOM
Surficial Deposits
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
75
Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
11
MODULAR A
Surficial Deposits
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
75
Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
12
WARNER HUTN BLDG
Surficial Deposits
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
75
Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
13
CITY HALL /NEW WING
Surficial Deposits
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
75
Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
14
THEATER
Surficial Deposits
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
75
Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
7
CONG SPR STRG
Surficial Deposits
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
75
Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
8
CONGSPR SCRKEEP
Surficial Deposits
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
75
Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
26
N. CAMPUS FELLOWSHIP
Surficial Deposits
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
75
Moderate
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
Pag2�6
City of Saratoga
Exposure Analysis
25
N. CAMPUS ADMIN BLDNG
Surficial Deposits
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
e Shake
•.
75
Liquefaction
Moderate
EQ-1nduced Liquefaction
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
19
CARETAKER CTAGE
Mostly Landslide Area
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
85
Very Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
20
PUMPHOUSE
Mostly Landslide Area
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
85
Very Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
23
CULTURAL EXCHANG
Mostly Landslide Area
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
85
Very Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
24
HAKONE PK OFFICE
Mostly Landslide Area
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
85
Very Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
16
MAIN HOUSE /PARK
Mostly Landslide Area
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
85
Very Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
17
GRDN PRK /EXHIBIT
Mostly Landslide Area
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
85
Very Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
3
COMMUNITY CNTR
Surficial Deposits
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
75
Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
4
CORP YARD
Surficial Deposits
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
75
Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
181
RESTROOM
Mostly Landslide Area
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
85
Very Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
21
STORAGE BLDG
Mostly Landslide Area
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
85
Very Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
22
GARAGE /GIFT SHOP
Mostly Landslide Area
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
85
Very Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
1
OLD LIBRARY
Surficial Deposits
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
85
Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
10
CITY HALL
Surficial Deposits
Mapping in Progress
85
Moderate
Mapping in Progress
5
LIBRARY
Surficial Deposits
Mapping in Progress
85
Moderate
Mapping in Progress
27
ID
FIRE STATION / ADMIN OFF.
Critical Facility
Surficial Deposits
Sea Level Rise 16"
Outside of CGS Landslide Zone
Sea Level Rise 55"
85
Low
Outside of CGS Liquefaction Zone
15
MUSEUM
Not Affected
Not Affected
9
CONCESSION /RSTRM
Not Affected
Not Affected
6
PRK /RSTRM /SNKBR
Not Affected
Not Affected
2
RESTROOM
Not Affected
Not Affected
11
MODULAR A
Not Affected
Not Affected
12
WARNER HUTN BLDG
Not Affected
Not Affected
13
CITY HALL /NEW WING
Not Affected
Not Affected
14
THEATER
Not Affected
Not Affected
7
CONG SPR STRG
Not Affected
Not Affected
8
CONGSPR SCRKEEP
Not Affected
Not Affected
26
N. CAMPUS FELLOWSHIP
Not Affected
Not Affected
25
N. CAMPUS ADMIN BLDNG
Not Affected
Not Affected
19
CARETAKER CTAGE
Not Affected
Not Affected
20
PUMPHOUSE
Not Affected
Not Affected
23
CULTURAL EXCHANG
Not Affected
Not Affected
24
HAKONE PK OFFICE
Not Affected
Not Affected
16
MAIN HOUSE /PARK
Not Affected
Not Affected
17
GRDN PRK /EXHIBIT
Not Affected
Not Affected
3
COMMUNITY CNTR
Not Affected
Not Affected
4
CORP YARD
Not Affected
Not Affected
18
RESTROOM
Not Affected
Not Affected
21
STORAGE BLDG
Not Affected
Not Affected
Pa9227
City of Saratoga
Exposure Analysis
ID
Critical Facility
Sea Level Rise 16"
Sea Level Rise 55"
22
GARAGE /GIFT SHOP
Not Affected
Not Affected
1
OLD LIBRARY
Not Affected
Not Affected
10
CITY HALL
Not Affected
Not Affected
5
LIBRARY
Not Affected
Not Affected
27
FIRE STATION /ADMIN OFF.
I Not Affected
Not Affected
Pag2�8
CITY Ot'w
SARATWA
Appendix C — Geologic and Seismic Hazards Constraints Mapping
Draft February 2013
229
to
CIIY 0��W
SARATWA
Draft February 2013
This page was intentionally left blank
11M -21
GROUND MOVEMENT POTENTIAL MAP
CITY OF SARATOGA,
......... 1�
i s \ Ps
S
Sbr
Ps df - Ps'
>� Sfs f �I i Ps
J C I , 1 /
r /
z Sun
Ms
Sbr
s. Sun .• Ps /� ,
J Pd Sb '1
i
J � r r �_� I Ms � v
/ Ps
Sbr:; -_ ps ,
1l V � /
Pd
7�� _ �•,• Imo' c.),, "' > Ps- _
.• "ti;� - .._... Sbr
IDS
Ms
Pd
Sbr Ps. _ Sbr
�. �.
r � Pd �
V.
i Ps ' —� r� I �f -. � � ' Sls
Sis
Pd S
Slb
T V
Ps
s r
Sbr \ \\ /
\ J _
Ps
Pd
o P
r Su
Sbr'
Ps �r �. �i /„ � Sun
Ps
��
u j
Sbr vn / s a PS
i, i
A. Ps
So Pd
Pd 0
Sbr Sbr Se
Pd
i, Pd'VA'
Ps
P v f
Pd At
i
Sbr Pf
P 1\
Pd
Ps
Sbr
�\ r
EXPLANATION
\r
iA un
Ups
i � F
Y
r
I'
Pds X11 � A
s Ps
Sbr
SI
Ps
r�
Ms
V /Ps -
i � 1
Ms r'
- - _ S Ps
S
Sb p Sbr/
Ps d Ms s, -
Pd
Md +Pmw -� _ Ps
I
Ps _
1
Relatively Stable Ground
Level ground to moderately steep slopes underlain by bedrock within approximately three feet
of the ground surface or less; relatively thin soil mantle may be subject to shallow landsliding,
settlement, and soil creep.
Unconsolidated granular material (alluvium, slope wash, and thick soil) on level ground and
Sun gentle slopes; subject to settlement and soil creep; liquefaction possible at valley floor sites
during strong earthquakes.
® Naturally stabilized ancient landslide debris on gentle to moderately steep slopes; subject to
settlement and soil creep.
Sex Generally highly expansive, clay -rich soils and bedrock subject to seasonal shrink - swell, rapid
soil creep, and settlement. Expansive soils may also occur within other map units.
Areas with Significant Potential for Ground Movement
Pmw Steep to very steep slopes generally underlain by weathered and fractured bedrock subject
to mass - wasting by rockfall, slumping, and raveling.
Paf Areas of artificial fill materials subject to localized settlement and /or potential landsliding
on moderately steep to steep ground and where placement may not have met engineering
specifications.
Ps Unstable, unconsolidated material, commonly less than 10 feet in thickness, on gentle to
moderately steep slopes subject to shallow landlsiding, slumping, settlement, and soil creep.
Liquefaction hazard zones as mapped by the California Geological Survey depicted by stipple.
® Unstable, unconsolidated material, commonly more than 10 feet in thickness, on moderate
to steep slopes; subject to deep landsliding
Pdf Debris flows (shallow, rapidity moving landslides) including recognized source areas and
flow paths. Depositional runout areas may not be fully depicted.
Areas with Potential for Primary Fault Rupture
Zone of potential primary surface fault rupture
Potentially active fault traces
Unstable Ground Characterized by Seasonally Active Downslope Movement
FlMs Moving shallow landslides, commonly less than 10 feet in thickness.
Moving deep landslides, commonly more than 10 feet in thickness.
0
8
Sun
Vi
0
CALIFORNIA
Sun
Da
�e
D
II
II
ii
�7om
ao 0a.
m o m e mo
u
/I
11 0 = Sbr
I �
I
`` II
II
Sun
4,
�0
r � � i
p i > �
0
s
i
f�
Sun
ai?
c '
f .P
VW
Ism 001 P91 P M*W
ME
Big � � � �i�Y■11 Ali � l�
' , ' ►� � �� R ""' 11 1001 W-1 . _ ®
��■.I ■jai �.�� , � .
I
.MW,>..v...
I
���I�.1 .G� S � � �AN!�� @►-1!/��f��� �� � �� .msM �FA I F1, � ������
NOTE TO USERS:
This is an interpretive map derived both from the Geologic Maps of the City of
Saratoga and from additional field observations and geologic experience in the
Saratoga region. All boundaries between zones are located approximately.
Information on this map is NOT sufficient to serve as a substitute for detailed,
site - specific geologic and geotechnical investigations necessary for construction.
Mapping illustrates the relative stability or movement potential, in the Saratoga area,
of ground in its natural undisturbed state. Works of man may seriously alter the
natural stability of the ground.
This map is an update and expansion of the Initial Movement Potential of Undisturbed
Ground Maps prepared by Terratech (1985), William Cotton and Associates, Inc.
(1977), and William Cotton and Associates, Inc. (1980). Alignment of the Berrocal Fault
reflects results of site specific fault investigations submitted to the City and cracking of
ground observed after the Loma Prieta Earthquake (1989). Alignments of the Monta Vista
and Shannon Faults reflect consideration of mapping by Rogers and Williams (1974)
and Herd (1980) and Bedrossian (1980a).
City limits and parcels are approximate and should not be used to determine property
boundaries or relied upon for topographic purposes. Approximations of road alingments
are indicated as dashed lines and were added to the City Parcel and Street base layer
(2005) for illustrative purposes. The map utilizes a 2006 topographic base map with
depicted contour intervals of 20 feet.
0
N
Feet
0 300 600 1,200 1,800 2,400
231
p
a 9
■
d
z ��e
0
PREVIOUS CITY SOURCE MAPS
2: William Cotton and Associates (1980)
3: Terratech (1985)
n
Pd'.
Sbr
CITY OF SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA
GEO /ENG BY
c
PROJECT NO.
JN
L
G5042
APPROVED BY
DATE
PLATE NO.
TS
JANUARY 2013
1 OF 1
P-
,
I
Std
�\ r
EXPLANATION
\r
iA un
Ups
i � F
Y
r
I'
Pds X11 � A
s Ps
Sbr
SI
Ps
r�
Ms
V /Ps -
i � 1
Ms r'
- - _ S Ps
S
Sb p Sbr/
Ps d Ms s, -
Pd
Md +Pmw -� _ Ps
I
Ps _
1
Relatively Stable Ground
Level ground to moderately steep slopes underlain by bedrock within approximately three feet
of the ground surface or less; relatively thin soil mantle may be subject to shallow landsliding,
settlement, and soil creep.
Unconsolidated granular material (alluvium, slope wash, and thick soil) on level ground and
Sun gentle slopes; subject to settlement and soil creep; liquefaction possible at valley floor sites
during strong earthquakes.
® Naturally stabilized ancient landslide debris on gentle to moderately steep slopes; subject to
settlement and soil creep.
Sex Generally highly expansive, clay -rich soils and bedrock subject to seasonal shrink - swell, rapid
soil creep, and settlement. Expansive soils may also occur within other map units.
Areas with Significant Potential for Ground Movement
Pmw Steep to very steep slopes generally underlain by weathered and fractured bedrock subject
to mass - wasting by rockfall, slumping, and raveling.
Paf Areas of artificial fill materials subject to localized settlement and /or potential landsliding
on moderately steep to steep ground and where placement may not have met engineering
specifications.
Ps Unstable, unconsolidated material, commonly less than 10 feet in thickness, on gentle to
moderately steep slopes subject to shallow landlsiding, slumping, settlement, and soil creep.
Liquefaction hazard zones as mapped by the California Geological Survey depicted by stipple.
® Unstable, unconsolidated material, commonly more than 10 feet in thickness, on moderate
to steep slopes; subject to deep landsliding
Pdf Debris flows (shallow, rapidity moving landslides) including recognized source areas and
flow paths. Depositional runout areas may not be fully depicted.
Areas with Potential for Primary Fault Rupture
Zone of potential primary surface fault rupture
Potentially active fault traces
Unstable Ground Characterized by Seasonally Active Downslope Movement
FlMs Moving shallow landslides, commonly less than 10 feet in thickness.
Moving deep landslides, commonly more than 10 feet in thickness.
0
8
Sun
Vi
0
CALIFORNIA
Sun
Da
�e
D
II
II
ii
�7om
ao 0a.
m o m e mo
u
/I
11 0 = Sbr
I �
I
`` II
II
Sun
4,
�0
r � � i
p i > �
0
s
i
f�
Sun
ai?
c '
f .P
VW
Ism 001 P91 P M*W
ME
Big � � � �i�Y■11 Ali � l�
' , ' ►� � �� R ""' 11 1001 W-1 . _ ®
��■.I ■jai �.�� , � .
I
.MW,>..v...
I
���I�.1 .G� S � � �AN!�� @►-1!/��f��� �� � �� .msM �FA I F1, � ������
NOTE TO USERS:
This is an interpretive map derived both from the Geologic Maps of the City of
Saratoga and from additional field observations and geologic experience in the
Saratoga region. All boundaries between zones are located approximately.
Information on this map is NOT sufficient to serve as a substitute for detailed,
site - specific geologic and geotechnical investigations necessary for construction.
Mapping illustrates the relative stability or movement potential, in the Saratoga area,
of ground in its natural undisturbed state. Works of man may seriously alter the
natural stability of the ground.
This map is an update and expansion of the Initial Movement Potential of Undisturbed
Ground Maps prepared by Terratech (1985), William Cotton and Associates, Inc.
(1977), and William Cotton and Associates, Inc. (1980). Alignment of the Berrocal Fault
reflects results of site specific fault investigations submitted to the City and cracking of
ground observed after the Loma Prieta Earthquake (1989). Alignments of the Monta Vista
and Shannon Faults reflect consideration of mapping by Rogers and Williams (1974)
and Herd (1980) and Bedrossian (1980a).
City limits and parcels are approximate and should not be used to determine property
boundaries or relied upon for topographic purposes. Approximations of road alingments
are indicated as dashed lines and were added to the City Parcel and Street base layer
(2005) for illustrative purposes. The map utilizes a 2006 topographic base map with
depicted contour intervals of 20 feet.
0
N
Feet
0 300 600 1,200 1,800 2,400
231
p
a 9
■
d
z ��e
0
PREVIOUS CITY SOURCE MAPS
2: William Cotton and Associates (1980)
3: Terratech (1985)
r&NCOTTON, SHIRES AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTNG ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS
GROUND MOVEMENT POTENTIAL MAP
CITY OF SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA
GEO /ENG BY
SCALE
PROJECT NO.
JN
As Shown
G5042
APPROVED BY
DATE
PLATE NO.
TS
JANUARY 2013
1 OF 1
CITY 0t
R AT .,
SAFETY ELEMENT Goals and Policies Comparison
Purpose: The purpose of this table is to provide a side by side comparison of the Goals, Policies, and Implementation Measures from the 1987
Saratoga Safety Element and the proposed 2013 Saratoga Safety Element.
Formatting: As part of this update, the formatting used to identify Goals, Policies, and Implementation Measures was revised as follows:
• Goal SAF -1
• Policy SAF -1.1
• Implementation Measure SAF -1.1a
1987 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
2013 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
and Implementation Measures
and Implementation Measures
Land Instability Hazards
1.0 (Goal) To protect residents from injuries and minimize property
Goal SAF -1: Protect residents from injuries and minimize property
damage resulting from land instability and geologic hazards in
damage resulting from land instability and geologic hazards.
populated areas.
1.1 (Policy) No development shall be permitted in the designated
Policy SAF -1.1: No development shall be permitted in geologic hazard
urban service area without individual site - specific geotechnical
areas without individual site - specific geotechnical investigations to
investigations to determine depth of bedrock, soil stability, location
determine depth of bedrock, soil stability, location of rift zones and
of rift zones and other localized geotechnical problems.
other localized geotechnical problems.
1.1 (IMP) The City Geologist will review proposals involving sites
Implementation Measure SAF -1.1a: As part of the development
having potential land instability or geologic hazards, and will make
review process, a qualified Geotechnical Consultant will review
recommendations accordingly.
proposals involving sites having potential land instability or geologic
hazards and will make recommendations accordingly.
1.2 (Policy) Development in areas subject to natural hazards shall be
Policy SAF -1.2: Development in areas subject to natural hazards shall
limited and shall be designed to protect the environment, inhabitants
be limited and shall be designed to protect the environment,
and general public. In areas which have been proven to be unsafe,
inhabitants and general public. In areas that have been proven to be
development of structures for human habitation shall be prohibited
unsafe, development of structures for human habitation shall be
to the maximum extent permitted by law.
prohibited to the maximum extent permitted by law.
02.14.2013
fC.� N
Goals and Policies Comparison
1987 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
2013 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
Lnr pit
A RAT
and Implementation Measures
1.3 (Policy) Proposals for General Plan amendments, zone changes,
Policy SAF -1.3: Proposals for General Plan amendments, zone
Goals and Policies Comparison
1987 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
2013 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
and Implementation Measures
and Implementation Measures
1.3 (Policy) Proposals for General Plan amendments, zone changes,
Policy SAF -1.3: Proposals for General Plan amendments, zone
use permits, variances, building site approvals, and all land
changes, use permits, variances, building site approvals, and all land
development applications subject to environmental assessment
development applications subject to environmental assessment
according to CEQA guidelines shall be reviewed for hazardous
according to CEQA guidelines shall be reviewed for hazardous
conditions utilizing the most current data.
conditions utilizing the most current data.
1.3 (Imp) Mitigation measures to eliminate potential geologic hazards
Implementation Measure SAF -1.3a: Mitigation measures to eliminate
identified during the environmental review process will be required
potential geologic hazards identified during the environmental review
as conditions of development.
process will be required as conditions of development.
Seismic Hazards
2.0 (Goal) To protect the residents of the City and surrounding areas
Goal SAF -2: Protect residents of the City and surrounding areas from
from seismically induced hazards.
seismically induced hazards.
2.1 (Policy) In order to mitigate the danger of earthquake damage,
Policy SAF -2.1: In order to mitigate the danger of earthquake
the City shall enforce strict earthquake construction and soil-
damage, the City shall enforce strict earthquake construction and
engineering standards, selecting the most stable areas for
soil- engineering standards, selecting the most stable areas for
development and requiring developers to compensate for soil
development and requiring developers to compensate for soil
instabilities through approved engineering and construction
instabilities through approved engineering and construction
techniques.
techniques.
2.2 (Policy) Critical structures and systems vital to the public health
Policy SAF -2.2: Critical structures and systems vital to the public
and safety (water, power and waster disposals systems, police an fire
health and safety (water, power and waste disposals systems, police
stations and communication facilities) shall not be designed to
and fire stations and communication facilities) shall be designed to
mitigate any seismic or geologic hazards associated with their sites.
mitigate any seismic or geologic hazards associated with their sites.
2.1 & 2.2 (Imp) A series of General Plan reference maps delineating
Implementation Measure SAF -2.2a: When made available, the City
geotechnical hazards and an environmental constraint is to be
should update the Safety Element to incorporate the latest mapping
maintained and periodically updated as necessary to aid in the review
produced by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and
of development proposals.
California Geological Survey (i.e. Alquist- Priolo Special Study Zones,
Seismic Hazards Mapping Reports, etc.).
02.14.2013
233
CITY 0t
SAR A
Goals and Policies Comparison
1987 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
2013 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
and Implementation Measures
and Implementation Measures
2.3 (Policy) The City should comply with State statutes regarding the
Policy SAF -2.3: The City should comply with State statutes regarding
identification of non- reinforced masonry structures.
the identification and retrofit of non - reinforced masonry structures.
2.3 (Imp) The City will inventory all non - reinforced masonry
Implementation Measure omitted.
structures in the Village area as State funding for such an inventory
becomes available, and develop a program to help mitigate structural
hazards related to such buildings.
Flood Hazards
3.0 (Goal) To reduce the damage to public and private property
Goal SAF -3: Reduce damage to public and private property resulting
resulting from flooding and flood induced hazards.
from flooding and flood induced hazards.
3.1 (Imp) All proposed projects adjacent to floodways and floodplains
Policy SAF -3.1: All proposed projects adjacent to floodways and
will be referred to the Water District for review and comments.
floodplains that could affect Water District right -of -way, should be
referred to the District for review and comments.
3.2 (Policy) The City shall continue to participate in the National Flood
Policy SAF -3.2: The City shall continue to participate in the National
Insurance Program.
Flood Insurance Program.
3.2 (Imp) The City will adopt and enforce a Floodplain Management
Implementation Measure SAF -3.2a: The City will maintain and
Ordinance, based on the national Model Floodplain Management
enforce a Floodplain Management Ordinance, based on the national
Ordinance to satisfy the requirements of the National Flood Insurance
Model Floodplain Management Ordinance to satisfy the
Program.
requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program.
3.3 (Policy) The City shall continue to enforce its existing regulations
Policy SAF -3.3: The City shall continue to enforce its existing
pertaining to impervious coverage to reduce potential hazards from
regulations pertaining to impervious coverage to reduce potential
excessive run -off.
hazards from excessive run -off.
3.3 (Imp) Implement by continuation of existing zoning regulations as
Implementation Measure SAF -3.3a: Implement the City's impervious
contained in the City Code.
coverage regulations by continuation of existing zoning regulations as
contained in the City Code.
02.14.2013
WE
Lr1Y Lit'
A RAT
Goals and Policies Comparison
1987 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
2013 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
and Implementation Measures
and Implementation Measures
Fire Hazards
4.0 (Goal) To reduce the danger of property damage and loss of life
Goal SAF -4: Reduce the danger of property damage and loss of life
due to fire in both urban and rural areas of the City.
due to urban and wild fires.
4.1 (Policy) The City shall require the installation of an early warning
Policy SAF -4.1: The City shall require the installation of an early
fire alarm system in each of the following cases:
warning fire alarm system in each of the following cases:
a. All new single - family dwellings and any existing single - family
a. All new single - family dwellings and any existing single - family
dwellings which are expanded by fifty percent or more in
dwellings that are expanded by fifty percent or more in floor
floor area, where such new or expanded dwellings are
area, where such new or expanded dwellings are located
located within designated hazardous fire area.
within designated hazardous fire area.
b. All new single - family dwellings having a gross floor area in
b. All new single - family dwellings having a gross floor area in
excess of 5,000 square feet.
excess of 5,000 square feet.
c. Any existing single family dwelling which is expanded by fifty
c. Any existing single family dwelling that is expanded by fifty
percent or more in floor area which, after such expansion,
percent or more in floor area which, after such expansion,
will exceed 5,000 square feet in gross floor area.
will exceed 5,000 square feet in gross floor area.
d. All new multi - family dwellings and other new structures
d. All new multi - family dwellings and other new structures
having multiple sleeping units, such as hotels, motels,
having multiple sleeping units, such as hotels, motels,
apartments, condominium or other community housing
apartments, condominium or other community housing
projects, townhouses and nursing homes.
projects, townhouses and nursing homes.
e. Any existing multi - family dwelling or other existing structure
e. Any existing multi - family dwelling or other existing structure
having multiple sleeping units such as described in Paragraph
having multiple sleeping units as described in Paragraph (d)
(d) above, which is expanded by fifty percent or more in gross
above, which is expanded by fifty percent or more in gross
area.
area.
4.1 (IMP) Implement through continuation of existing subdivision,
Implementation Measure SAF -4.1a: Implement through
zoning and building regulations as contained in the City Code.
continuation of existing subdivision, zoning and building regulations
as contained in the City Code.
02.14.2013
Wei
CITY 0t
SAR A
Goals and Policies Comparison
1987 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
2013 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
and Implementation Measures
77
and Implementation Measures
Policy SAF -4.2: The City shall coordinate with the Santa Clara County
Fire Safe Council on preventing and reducing future losses from
wildfires.
Implementation Measure SAF -4.2a: The City shall coordinate with
Previous Safety Element did not have policies/ implementation
the Santa Clara County Fire Department, and surrounding hillside
communities on the preparation and implementation of a Community
measures pertaining to this issue.
Wildfire Protection Plan.
Implementation Measure SAF -4.2b: Conduct fuel load management
activities within the City's Wildland -Urban Interface areas to reduce
fire potential on public and private properties and increase fire
response effectiveness.
4.2 (Policy) The Chief of the fire district having jurisdiction should be
Policy SAF -4.3: The Fire Chief, having jurisdiction, should be
authorized to require the installation of an early warning fire alarm
authorized to require the installation of an early warning fire alarm
system in any new commercial structure or community facility, or
system in any new commercial structure or community facility, or
expansion of an existing commercial structure by fifty percent or
expansion of an existing commercial structure by fifty percent or
more in gross floor area, whenever the Chief deems such
more in gross floor area, whenever the Fire Chief deems such
requirement to be necessary or appropriate on the basis of facts and
requirement to be necessary or appropriate on the basis of facts and
circumstances in each individual case.
circumstances in each individual case.
4.2 (IMP) Implement through continuation of existing subdivision,
Implementation Measure SAF -4.3a: Implement through continuation
zoning and building regulations as contained in the City Code.
of existing subdivision, zoning and building regulations as contained
in the City Code.
4.3 (Policy) The City shall encourage all property owners to install an
Policy SAFAA The City shall encourage all property owners to install
early warning fire alarm system on a voluntary basis where
an early warning fire alarm system on a voluntary basis where such
such owners are not otherwise required to do so.
owners are not otherwise required to do so.
4.3 (Imp) Implement by continuation of existing provision in the
Implementation Measure SAF -4.4a: Implement by continuation of
building regulations allowing voluntary installation of the system
existing provision in the building regulations allowing voluntary
02.14.2013
PAZ.
CITY OF
SARAT ,A,
Goals and Policies Comparison
1987 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
2013 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
and Implementation Measures
and Implementation Measures
and publicize the availability of the system for any property located
installation of the system and publicize the availability of the system
within the City.
for any property located within the City.
4.4 (Policy) The City shall continue to enforce its existing regulations
Policy SAF -4.5: The City shall continue to enforce existing regulations
pertaining to hazardous fire areas, fire retardant construction and
pertaining to hazardous fire areas (wildland -urban interface), fire
landscaping.
retardant construction and landscaping (fuel modification).
4.4 (Imp) Periodically review subdivision, zoning and building
Implementation Measure SAF -4.5a: Periodically review subdivision,
regulations which pertain to hazardous fire areas to determine if
zoning and building regulations that pertain to hazardous fire areas to
significant changes are required.
determine if significant changes are required.
4.4a (Imp) Update map depicting hazardous fire areas as needed.
Implementation Measure SAF -4.5b: Update the City's Wildland-
Urban Interface map and Fire Hazard Areas Map, when new data and
information is made available by local, State, and Federal agencies.
4.5 (Policy) The City shall study the need for additional fire
Policy SAF -4.6: The City shall coordinate with the Santa Clara County
prevention regulations for the built up, populated areas of the City.
Fire Department on the need for additional fire prevention
regulations for the built up, populated areas of the City.
4.5 (Imp) The City, in cooperation with the local fire districts, will
Implementation Measure SAF -4.6a: The City, in cooperation with
review and modify, as necessary, existing building regulations to
the County of Santa Clara Fire Department, will review and modify, as
require Type A & B fir retardant roof materials in the densely
necessary, existing building regulations to require Type A & B fire
populated flatlands of the City.
retardant roof materials in the densely populated flatlands of the
City.
Emergency Preparedness
5.0 (Goal) To develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan
Goal SAF -5: Develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan
which will provide effective response in the event of a natural or
which will provide effective response in the event of a natural or
manmade disaster.
manmade disaster.
5.1 (Policy) The City shall review and update on a regular basis its
Policy SAF -5.1: The City shall review and update on a regular basis its
02.14.2013
184C1l
CITY 0t
SAR A
Goals and Policies Comparison
1987 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
2013 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
and Implementation Measures
and Implementation Measures
plan for emergency preparedness. This plan shall use local resources
plan for emergency response and preparedness. This plan shall use
and manpower to provide maximum benefit and protection for the
local resources and manpower to provide maximum benefit and
City's residents.
protection for the City's residents.
5.1 (Imp) Review and update annually the City's Emergency Plan,
Implementation Measure SAF -5.1a: Review and update annually the
modifying the plan if significant changes are required. Sections of the
City's Emergency Operations Plan, modifying the plan if significant
plan which are incomplete will be completed in a timely manner.
changes are required. Sections of the plan which are incomplete will
be completed in a timely manner.
Implementation Measure SAF -5.1b: Coordinate with Public Works
Department, Santa Clara County Fire Department and Santa Clara
County Office of Emergency Services on the identification and
provision of funding sources to construct an evacuation route along
the existing right -of -way already obtained by the City connecting
Norton Road to Piedmont Road.
5.2 (Policy) The City shall coordinate its plan with local jurisdictions
Policy SAF -5.2: The City shall coordinate its Emergency Operations
and regional agencies to anticipate cumulative impacts during times
Plan with local jurisdictions and regional agencies to anticipate
of disaster.
cumulative impacts during times of disaster.
5.2 (Imp) Review adjacent jurisdictions' plans and resolve areas of
Implementation Measure SAF -5.2a: Coordinate with Santa Clara
potential conflict.
County Office of Emergency Services to review the County and
adjacent jurisdictions' plans and resolve areas of potential conflict.
Implementation Measure SAF -5.2b: On an annual basis, the City will
review the Santa Clara County Multi- Jurisdictional Local Hazard
Mitigation Plan and the City's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex to
ensure that identified mitigation actions are being incorporated into
upcoming City sponsored projects, where appropriate.
5.3 (Policy) The City shall encourage all citizens to take responsibility
Policy SAF -5.3: The City shall encourage all citizens to take
02.14.2013
PAN]
CITY 0t
SAR A
Goals and Policies Comparison
1987 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
and Implementation Measures
2013 Safety Element Goals, Policies,
and Implementation Measures
for their own safety in the event of a disaster.
responsibility for their own safety in the event of a disaster.
5.3 (Imp) The City shall publicize and participate in disaster
Implementation Measure SAF -5.3a: The City shall publicize and
preparedness exercises and distribute emergency planning
participate in disaster preparedness exercises and distribute
information to the citizens of Saratoga.
emergency planning information to the citizens of Saratoga.
Implementation Measure SAF -5.3b: The City shall coordinate with
Santa Clara County Office of Emergency Services on potential disaster
preparedness training opportunities (i.e. CERT, Red Cross, etc...) for
Saratoga residents.
02.14.2013
fCARI
CHANGES TO THE DRAFT SAFETY ELEMENT
Revisions made to Pages 4 through 92 of the Safety Element are in response to
comments submitted by the City Geologist.
Page 4, Last Paragraph, Last Sentence
Although most of the hillside areas in the City experience these hazards to some degree, the
most severe risks are found in the western portion of the City within the vicinity of the Berrocal
Fault, where the topography becomes much steeper and geologic units are more prone to larger
landslides.
Page 7, First Paragraph, Third Sentence
Within the City boundaries, landslides are most likely to occur where silt and clay have been
eroded along stream channels traversing the City and within large preexisting landslide
deposits.
Page 11, Fourth Paragraph, First Sentence
The Berrocal, Monta Vista, and Shannon Faults located within the City limits are considered
three "potentially active" faults lying on the alluvial plain.
Page 12, Third Paragraph, First Sentence
The Shannon Fault, part of the Monta Vista Fault system, closely parallels the State Highway 85
corridor from Regnart Creek (Cupertino) in the north, crossing Saratoga Avenue, and continuing
to the Almaden Expressway in the southeast portion of San Jose.
240
Re visions made to Pages 23 through 50 of the Safety Element are in response to
comments received from the Planning Commission during their Study Session (1 -8-
20 13) and Public Hearing (1-23-2013).
Page 23, Second Paragraph, Third Sentence:
Two hospitals are located in the vicinity of Saratoga that could provide emergency care post-
disaster: El Camino Hospital Los Gatos on Pollard Road in Los Gatos and Good Samaritan
Hospital on Samaritan Drive, located in San Jose.
Page 41, Table 1
Table 1
Hazard Analysis Likelihood of Occurrence
Likelihood
Severity
Hazard
Infrequent
Sometimes
Frequent
Low
Moderate
High
Aviation Disaster
X
X
X
X
Civil Disturbance
X
Earthquake M <5
X
X
Earthquake M >5
X
X
X
Extreme Weather /Storm
X
X
X
Floods
X
X
X
Landslides
X
X
X
HAZMAT
X
X
Heat Wave
X
X
X
Public Health Emergency
X
X
X
X
Terrorism
X
X
X
X
Transportation- Highway
X
X
Wildfire /Forest Fire
X
X
Source: Saratoga Emergency Operations Plan, 2009
Page 42, Second Paragraph, Last Sentence (new):
A secondary evacuation route has been identified along Sarahills Drive and Verde Vista Lane,
which would be necessary if evacuation along Pierce Road becomes difficult or requires re-
routing.
Page 45, Second Paragraph, Last Sentence (new):
241
However, it should be noted that after an emergency/ disaster event other facilities within
Saratoga and surrounding areas may offer evacuation shelter services outside of those listed in
Table 2.
Page 45, Table 2
Table 2
American Red Cross Shelters
Facility
Address
City
Zip Code
Prospect High School
18900 Prospect Avenue
Saratoga
95070
Redwood Middle School
13925 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga
95070
Saratoga Community Center
19655 Allendale Avenue
Saratoga
95070
Saratoga High School
20300 Herriman Avenue
Saratoga
95070
West Valley College
14000 Fruitvale
Saratoga
95070
Southwest YMCA
13500 Quito Road
San Jose
95070
Campbell Middle School
295 Cherry Lane
Campbell
95008
Westmont High School
4805 Westmont Avenue
Campbell
95008
Cupertino High School
10100 Finch Avenue
Cupertino
95014
De Anza College
21250 Stevens Creek Boulevard
Cupertino
95014
Homestead High School
21370 Homestead Road
Cupertino
95014
Hyde Middle School
19325 Bollinger Avenue
Cupertino
95014
Kennedy Middle School
821 Bubb Road
Cupertino
95014
Monte Vista High School
21840 McClellan Road
Cupertino
95014
Quinlan Community Center
10185 N. Stelling Road
Cupertino
95014
Calvary Baptist Church
16330 Los Gatos Boulevard
Los Gatos
95032
Lakeside Elementary School
19621 Black Road
Los Gatos
95033
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day
Saints
15955 Rose Avenue
Los Gatos
95030
Loma Prieta Community Center
23800 Summit Road
Los Gatos
95033
Loma Prieta School
23800 Summit Road
Los Gatos
95033
Los Gatos High School
20 High School Court
Los Gatos
95030
R.J. Fisher Middle School
19195 Fisher Avenue
Los Gatos
95032
Rolling Hills Middle School
1585 More Avenue
Los Gatos
95032
Source: Saratoga Emergency Operations Plan, 2009
Page 50 First Paragraph, Second Sentence
The purpose of this information is to establish a policy framework that is consistent with the
City's vision, that meets the community's needs and that effectively addresses the potential
hazards that could impact the City.
242
Re visions made to Pages 52 through 54 of the Safety Element are in response to
comments received from the City Council during their Study Session on February 4,
Page 52, Section IV. Fire Hazards
Policy SAF -4.2: The City shall coordinate with the Santa Clara County Fire Safe Council on
preventing and reducing future losses from wildfires.
Page 53, Section IV. Fire Hazards, cont'd
Implementation Measure SAF -4.2a: The City shall coordinate with the Santa Clara County Fire
Department, and surrounding hillside communities on the preparation and implementation of a
Community Wildfire Protection Plan.
Implementation Measure SAF -4.2b: Conduct fuel load management activities within the City's
Wildland -Urban Interface areas to reduce fire potential on public and private properties and
increase fire response effectiveness.
(With the addition of these new policies and implementation measures, the numbering of
subsequent policies and implementation measures has been revised).
Page 54, Section V. Emergency Preparedness
Implementation Measure SAF -5.1b: Coordinate with Public Works Department, Santa Clara
County Fire Department and Santa Clara County Office of Emergency Services on the
identification and provision of funding sources to construct an evacuation route along the
existing right -of -way already obtained by the City connecting Norton Road to Piedmont Road.
243
CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO: 13 -002
RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPT THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND THE SAFETY ELEMENT
WHEREAS, a General Plan must contain certain elements, including a Safety
Element which establishes policies and programs to protect the community from risks associated
with seismic, geologic, flood, and wildfire hazards; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study (IS) and Negative Declaration (ND) were prepared for the
Project, pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, Public
Resources Code § §21000- 21178, Title 14, Chapter 3 California Code of Regulations §15000-
15387, Section 15070 (CEQA State Guidelines); and
WHEREAS, the IS and a notice of intent to adopt a ND were duly noticed and circulated
for a 20 -day public review period beginning December 19, 2012; and
WHEREAS, on January 23, 2012 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed
Public Hearing on the draft Safety Element and Negative Declaration at which time all interested
parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence and argument. The
Planning Commission considered the draft Safety Element, CEQA documentation,
correspondence, presentations from the public, and all testimony and other evidence presented at
the Public Hearing, and
WHEREAS, it was determined that the proposed adoption of the Safety Element would not
result in potential significant impacts on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Safety Element is consistent with the
City of Saratoga General Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby recommend
that the City Council of the City of Saratoga adopt the Negative Declaration and the Safety
Element.
Attachments:
Exhibit A -- Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration
Exhibit B — Proposed Safety Element
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga, this 23d
of January, 2013 by the following vote:
AYES: HLAVA, ALMALECH, BERNALD, WALIA, ZHAO
NOES:
ABSENT: GROVER, REIS '
ABSTAIN: , cv\�A
Tina K. Walia
Cbair, Planning Commission
244
V 'y
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
X956
01
MEETING DATE: February 20, 2013 AGENDA ITEM:
DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office CITY MANAGER: Dave Anderson
PREPARED BY: Mainini Cabute DIRECTOR: Dave Anderson
Administrative Analyst II
SUBJECT: 2013 Movie Night Series Program & Outdoor Movie Equipment
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Accept report and direct staff to work with Parks and Recreation Commission to implement 2013 Movie
Night Series and to proceed with renting outdoor movie equipment for the series.
BACKGROUND:
At the September 19, 2011 City Council Meeting, the City Council deliberated on whether the City
should purchase outdoor movie equipment and then directed staff to seek a recommendation from the
Parks and Recreation Commission on the following:
1) Feasibility of and plan for holding more movie nights in the summer of 2013.
2) Whether the City should continue renting outdoor movie equipment, purchase it, or take a hybrid
approach.
Attached to this staff report is a matrix of comparable cities that hold outdoor movie night events. and
The matrix describes how often these cities show movies and the approach they have taken with their
outdoor movie night equipment.
Parks and Recreation Commission Recommendation
At the January 8, 2013 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the Commission prepared the
following proposal to hold an Outdoor Movie Night Series this summer:
Show 3 movies this summer, one movie each month starting in June on the 3rd Friday of every
summer month: June 21, July 19th, and August 16th.
Host all three events at Wildwood Park.
Show family - friendly movies starting at 7:30 p.m.
Work with the Saratoga Village Development Council to develop an outreach plan that gives
movie attendees incentives to visit Village restaurants and stores before the movie begins.
Work with the Youth Commission to recommend the movies to show and to pass out popcorn to
movie attendees.
On February 5, 2013, the Parks and Recreation Commission met and discussed whether it would be most
cost effective for the City to continue renting the outdoor movie equipment, to purchase equipment, or to
take a hybrid approach by purchasing one or two items and renting the others. After reviewing the cost
information, the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended the following:
Page 1 of 3
245
The City should rent the equipment for the 2013 movie series and continue renting the equipment
until the movie night series events are well - attended.
The City should purchase the movie equipment if it is holding five or more well- attended and
successful movie nights.
Once the City has established a well- attended and successful event series of five or more events
per year, it should consider purchasing all of the equipment since it is the most cost effective
option per event.
Equipment Cost
Equipment costs range from approximately $4,500 to $10,200 based on the quotes city staff obtained
from three different vendors. Each vendor recommended a set of comparable movie equipment that each
believed would work well for the type of outdoor movie event the City has held in the past.
The cost to rent the full set of equipment rental totals $845 per event and is reduced to $737 per event if
the City rents the full equipment 3 times per year.
If the City decides to take a hybrid approach by purchasing one or more piece of equipment while renting
others, the equipment rental cost would be determined by the type of equipment that is being rented. The
rental cost for the movie screen totals $300 per event. The rental cost for the projector totals $350. The
cost to rent speakers totals $200 per event.
Cost Per Event
Whether the City purchases all of the equipment or some of the equipment, conducting movie nights will
cost a minimum of $660 per event. Event costs are determined by the type of equipment rented, whether
technicians are hired to work at the event, City staff time, and the cost of a movie license. Below is a table
that outlines the cost per event factoring the various scenarios of either owning or renting some or all of
the equipment. Each event requires at least two individuals to transport, set up and dismantle the
equipment. If the City purchases all of the equipment, the event would require two City staff to set up and
tear down equipment. If the City rents some or all of the equipment, technicians can be hired from the
rental company to oversee set up and take down.
PER EVENT COST
OPTION
Movie
Equipment &
Park
Public Works
Total Cost
License
Technician
Attendant
Staff Member
of Event
Rent
$250
$845
$200
N/A
$1295
1 Event Per
Year (Avista)
Rent
$250
$737
$200
N/A
$1187
3 Events Per
Year (Avista)
Purchase
$250
N/A
$200
$210
$660
Equipment
Hybrid
$250
$300 (screen)
$200
N/A
$1010
Approach 1 -
$260 (tech)
Purchase
Projector and
Speakers, Rent
Screen
Hybrid
$250
$350 (projector)
$200
N/A
$1060
Approach 2 -
$260 (tech)
Purchase
Screen and
Speakers, Rent
Projector
Page 2 of 3
.,
FISCAL IMPACTS:
If the Council accepts the Parks and Recreation Commission's recommendation to hold 3 events in the
summer of 2013 and continue to rent the equipment, the total cost for the 3 events is approximately
$3,561. Since one event will take place during the 2012/13 fiscal year (FY), the fiscal impact would be
$1,187 and $2,374 in FY 2013/14. If the City decides to make the three outdoor movie series an annual
event, there will be an additional cost of $1,187 in June of 2014 totaling $3,561 for fiscal year. Council
may direct staff to allocate funding for the movie series in the FY 2012/13 and 2013/14 budgets. There is
currently $50,000 available in the Council Discretionary Fund.
CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FOLLOWING THE RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
If Council does not direct staff to implement the Parks and Recreation's Commission, there will be no
three outdoor movie night series in the summer of 2013.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S):
Alternatively, the Council may direct staff to do the following:
1) Conduct more or less outdoor movie night events.
2) Purchase some or all of the outdoor movie night equipment.
If Council chooses an alternative action, staff will return to Council with a budget adjustment for any
expenses that will occur this fiscal year. Expenses in Fiscal Year 2013/14 will be included in the proposed
Fiscal Year 2013/14 budget.
FOLLOW UP ACTION(S):
Implement Council direction.
ADVERTISING, NOTICING AND PUBLIC CONTACT:
Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, this item was properly posted as a City Council agenda
item and was included in the packet made available on the City's web site in advance of the
meeting. A copy of the agenda packet is also made available at the Saratoga Branch Library each
Monday in advance of the Council meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: Matrix of Cities that Conduct Movie Nights
Page 3 of 3
247
Outdoor Movie Equipment- Comparable
Cities
City of Saratoga
Page 1 of 2
Requirement
Saratoga
Campbell
Cupertino
Danville
Los Altos
Mountain View
Redwood City
Organization
City
Downtown
City
City
Village
City
City
Conducting
Association
Association
Event
Own or Rent
Rent
Own
Rent
Own
Own
Own & Rent-
Own
(own screen
and set of
speakers)
Location
Wildwood Park
Downtown
Memorial Park
Parks
Downtown
Parks
Downtown
Amphitheater
Budget Per
$1,300- reflects
$500- reflects
$2,800- reflects
$500- reflects
$1,200 - $1,500-
$1,200- reflects
$700-$1,000 -
Event
rental of movie
movie rental with
rental of movie
movie rental
reflects costs of
rental of
reflects staff costs
equipment,
licensing and
equipment,
with licensing
movie rental
remaining
and movie rental
technicians for
miscellaneous
technicians,
and
with licensing,
equipment,
w/ licensing
set -up and tear-
costs
movie rental
miscellaneous
special
movie rental
down, movie
with licensing
costs
permits,
with licensing,
rental with
and additional
bouncy
staff time for 4
licensing,
$1,000 for
houses,, and
part -time
hiring a park
movie licensing
portable toilets
employees and
attendant
and part -time
pre- popped
staff
popcorn
Page 1 of 2
Movie Nights
1
10 (Each Friday
4 (Thursdays in
5 (Every other
3 (Fridays in
6 (Fridays
13 (Thursdays
Per Year
starting from last
August)
Friday from
August)
starting 2nd
starting in June
week of June
June through
week of July
through August)
through August)
August)
until 3rd Friday
in August)
249
n; SA1g
G ~� P
P
�� IF OE[ iS1
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: February 20, 2013
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
PREPARED BY: Cynthia McCormick
AGENDA ITEM:
CITY MANAGER: Dave Anderson
DIRECTOR: James Lindsay
SUBJECT: Provide Direction on the Planning Commission's Review of Residential Design
Review Handbook & Front Yard Landscaping
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Provide direction on the scope of review.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved the 2013 Community Development work plan at its January 25th
annual retreat, where each Planning Commission work item would receive specific direction
from the Council at a regularly scheduled meeting. One of the approved Commission work items
was to review the guidelines for designing residential homes in Saratoga. To gain more input
from the design community, the Planning Commission has also expressed an interest in working
with the local chapter of the American Institute of Architects (AIA).
DISCUSSION:
Residential Design Review Handbook
The Residential Design Handbook is used to illustrate strategies for designing homes in the
hillsides and R -1 neighborhoods. Updated techniques and illustrations are needed to better guide
the design of replacement homes in established R -1 neighborhoods, while those related to
hillside development are still relevant and could be contained in a separate section within the
updated Handbook.
The current guidelines are organized to address bulk, landscaping, privacy, views, and energy
efficiency. While this organization is intended to embody the design review findings in City
Code Section 15- 45.080, it does not necessarily reduce the ambiguity of concepts such as bulk,
mass, views, and privacy — leading to inconsistency and uncertainty in the approval process.
This ambiguity could be minimized by referring to architectural features that contribute to a
building's bulk and mass such as roof forms and wall planes. While development inherently has
some impact on neighboring properties -- techniques related to windows, balconies, and site
placement could help address reasonable expectations of privacy and views (especially in the
denser neighborhoods).
Page 1 of 2
250
The design guidelines should be easy to interpret, should not inhibit creativity, and should
provide the owner, applicant, and design professional more certainty in the process. The
document should also be easy to implement and help ensure more consistency in decision
making by staff, the Planning Commission, and the City Council.
Front Yard Landscaping
Front yard landscaping is required for projects that go through the design review process. While
the City has limitations on aggregate impervious coverage over an entire property, there are no
specific regulations on the type of front yard material in the front yard. Some cities have
instituted limits on the amount of paving that can occur in a front yard while other cities with
landscaping ordinances have specific requirements for live plant material. The outcome of this
work would most likely result in minor code amendments and incorporation of landscaping
guidelines into the updated Design Review Handbook.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Residential Design Guidelines (current)
Page 2 of 2
251
252
RESIDENTIAL
DESIGN
HANDBOOK
City of Saratoga
SPEC194L IiiEGAli AI-IONS t014 OL ,AA E' ',OTS
The length of a solid fence shall not exceed 60 feet as viewed from
streets or adjacent lots.
0 The maximum area of enclosure within a fence shall not exceed 4,000
sq. ft. unless the fence is not visible and/or necessary for safety
reasons, subject to Planning Director approval.
* Chain link fences are not allowed except for recreational courts.
0 No retaining wall on a hillside lot shall exceed 5 feet in height.
Parallel ,fences and walls shall be separated by a horizontal
distance of no Lass than 5 feet.
10 Where two or more fences or walls are approximately parallel to each
other and separated by horizontal distance of 30 feet or less, the
combined height of such fences or walls shall not exceed 10 feet.
* In addltll I(1t.h:
253
hT--- h L
A
Nftwrrxxn
r5flT 141 �
30ft. of more
hi _
max
Leesss- than{
31 I
C -�
254-
PREFACE
DESIGN POLICIES AND TECHNKKJES
MtnffNze pemoplion of Wk
integrate stnoctums with on0umimt
Avoo intern WM privacy
w" vw to V
Desir W ei'!E�,F g y efflexmcy
RESIDENTIAL ZONING STANQAFt0S
Height Relit
Setbacks
II npef viou 5 cmerage
Amble Door area
Fei -e r i -t¢iorls-
I.
255
1
2
3
10
is
24
28
3
34
3
37
38
40
41
PREFACE
Saratoga's physical characteristics are unique among the many
communities located in the Santa Clara Valley area. The City's
boundaries encompass both a flat, older residential area of the
valley and newer residential development in the steeper foothills of
the Santa Cruz mountains. The rural residential character of the
City has been created and maintained through low residential
densities, extensive landscaping along streets and yards, openness
of yards to the street, and the relatively low profile and height of
residences. The protection of views, both from the hillsides to the
valley and from the valley floor to the hillsides, has also been an
important part of Saratoga's physical development.
The Saratoga General Plan acknowledges and protects the unique
residential characteristics of the City through adopted policies and
programs in each of its Elements and through the regulations of the
Zoning Code. The specific regulations for design review of single -
family residential dwellings appear as Article 15 -45 of the City
Code. This Handbook has been prE•pari:d to assist in the
implementation of those regulations.
The purpose of this Handbook is to guide the homeowner, architect,
developer and builder in designing new single - family dwellings, or
remodeling existing ones, that will be har.lionious with the existing
fabric of Saratoga. The Handbook also :;carves as a guide for the
city Council, Planning Commission and City staff in the design
review process. The design policies and implementation techniques
set forth in the Handbook are not meant to discourage unique and
inventive design solutions. Rather they embody the intent of the
findings that must be made for design review applications, and serve
as a basis on which decision- making bodies make their design - related
decisions. All of the policies and implementation measures in this
Handbook are interrelated. The repetition of certain key concepts
emphasizes their importance.
This Handbook is organized into two sections. The first section
outlines the live broad single - family residential design policies
for Saratoga. Each policy is defined briefly, then followed by
design techniques that can be used to achieve the intent of the
policy. Sketches and renderings are used throuc4hout this section to
illustrate the policies and techniques. The second section contains
the residential zoning standards relating to allowable floor area,
height, coverage, and setbacks. This section also contains tree
removal and fence regulations.
256
POLICY #1: MINIMIZE PERCEPTION OF BULK
Techniques
1. Minimize changes to natural topography
2. Follow hillside contours
3. Use materials and colors to reduce bulk
4. Minimize building height
5. Design structure to fit with existing neighborhood
b. Use architectural features to break up massing
POLICY #2: INTEGRATE STRUCTURES WITH ENVIRONMENT
Techniques
1. Use natural materials and colors
2. Integrate with environmental texture and forms
3. Use landscaping to blend structure with environment
4. Integrate all structures on a single site
5. Blend roof and parking surfaces with environment
5. Integrate fences and walls with structures and setting
POLICY #3: AVOID INTERFERENCE SMITH PRIVACY
Techniques
1. Control view to adjacent properties
2. Locate buildings to minimize privacy impact
3. Use landscaping to enhance privacy
4. Reduce noise impacts on adjacent dwellings
5. Control exterior light sources
POLICY 14. PRESERVE VIEWS AND ACCESS TO VIEWS
Techniques
1. Locate structure to minimize view blockage
2. Maximize View but avoid conflict with privacy
3. Locate structure to reduce height impact
POLICY #5. DESIGN FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Techniques
I. Design for maximum benefit of sun and wind
2. Landscape to control exposure to sun and wind
3. Allow light, air and solar access to adjacent homes
4. Incorporate energy - saving devices into the design
DESIGN POLICIES AND TECHNIQUES
257 z
POLICY 1
The bulk of a structure is
related to its floor area,
height, design and relation-
ship to its surroundings. A
structure is perceived to be
bulky when these elements are
combined in such a way as to
create a residence that is out
of scale, visually and struc-
turally, with neighboring
residences and its own natural
setting. The residence then
appears massive, blocky, and
overwhelming to the eye. The
purpose of this policy is to
ensure the maximum integration
of structures with their natu-
ral and built environments.
MINIMIZE PERCEPTION OF` BULK
4��a
Policy 1 TK*M 1; MInkWze changes to natural topography
DO'S
im
+±
DON'T'
A k'8 o
uvkdu" �ow avea6.
0 L8 UO"5,tv
L Yem Mral W
— c 1�,
YES
} T'� r
N s
259
Policy 1 TECHNIQUE side contours
DO'S
Fz;I z)ws
'hEWrWie tIeMVAtS
0 e II Ovj VLAt'LL+.&I "
C-�O
DONT'S
Avn6
9 psi 'UWY ,
F
-6�MAb .
Avv` W
1
E.!
-
NO
r0000�
260
Policy I TECHNIOM #3: Use mateiials and colors to ice bulk
ID Ike, A +vIva -
m 6uer
N'T'
40 'dl �
4�11�
Ij
41 � VAAM t&b-Cn
4ibrf .r
4D I'x kA
YE.
10101
--
Pk
261 ra
.Policy I
TECHNIQUE #4: Minimize build"Ing height
o
�.
�w, ,
W-s'-
• Set ha ki*pc+-
Dwh,rus Ct st�.
uOWT
Am[ane aAx
y- area
YES
2M
262 7
PORGY I
TECHNIQUE # : De sign structure , -to fit w i t h
F r�.ir
YE
0
w
mmr Flir-
263 0
Poky I TECHNIQUE : Use architectural Features to break up massing
L-110-10
OA r
F
wwr ,
e�
6w. -..
1 i' % d '>
&0 Ob -�tA fkt
�1
IV E
r; �e m
3,
s FIFT `� n m
NO
FT A
264
POLIO
Fre:,ervation of the natural
land. cape and environment is
onu of Saratoga's most im-
portant goals. When a stric-
ture is designed to follow
natural topographic contours
and retain existing vegetation
and soil, its impact on the
natural setting is minimized.
This policy focuses on the
protection of Saratoga's
unique environmental quali-
ties and the design of struc-
tures that respect their
natural surroundings.
INTEGRATE STRUCTURES WITH ENVIRONMENT
265 10
Policy 2 TMH III QUE ft Use natural materials and co4ors
YES--
NO
266
it
Policy TECHNIOM : In with envircionrientiM texture and forms
DO"S
0
0 r
I
* Avui8 m�ZKUI
a Avvi6 [0-10
�Wur
I.kk, Kt
YES
O
in� 111�f
A . ",_�
267 :2
Poky
TECPHH E #3: Use landscaping to blend structure with env iro►n me nt
FD -as
r 4lu nukirFe ur$rtctiax
Vti�t�l'QrbAj� 1i1. M�.�L�'l
M po�/5ibic
• l.{St tciudsc�.�-i+�{ ah
0. raiit4a�Eiov�.�buA`
Yid# o7aU 0. dt9 t r
SoiwtiLum
I )()N'T'
' v
Or
1
f V
YES
�r.
.F
ryd� F+
-
•i
�I +
ct7
-_Tr—
I
pokcy 2
TECHNIQUE #4m. Integrate all structure!--s single site
I)O+S
"It um " CL
C-A
YI&L Uw
5c �A 4r t
a � )-M�-
DON'T'S
Aw y Kum
�w
aacxvor�
9+VnALtUX"
YES
IT
�� el
Als.11
269 1 1
Policy 2
Ole-nd roof and parkkkg structures with env kvwwnent
DO'S
1
i
YES
NO
�k
. 5
270
a�J°y
4.5
taoiieAp un
FCJIDW WVJVUY IA M
1 _ 6- VVI tV
r;m.�p�avus r
MAC
i
�q° lie M ie
-r .
271 If
Residential privacy is a key
ingredient in the quality of
life in Saratoga. Privacy
problems and impacts should be
resolved and addressed in the
initial design stage, not with
mitigation measures proposed
as an afterthought. Particu-
lar attention should be given
to privacy concerns on sub-
standard, small and infill
lots.
AVOID INTERFERENCE WITH PRIVACY
272 18
Policy 3 TECHNIQUE #t Control view to adjacent properties
DDIS
tV-1 uQ
UA m
.L�k ?�6 -h
10 Na&t
�,00�v-
bak uo.- Iowa r&
�Vtj, LeAd OXUA .
kziuf M4
Ak�C.. Vi t
K-01MV
Yid 8r
YES 1,
Mal # i
Y
J:A" #I
NO
0 era K
a�
Iq
273
Policy 3 TECHNIQUE .- Locate buildings to minimize privacy impact
Diml
-btv.
= (VMA- VW
t. &v%(4 - i
4m
DONOT f
Ye A
S} f r
T
,�•
fit..
Ilk,
NO i
IM1 T_,
274 20
-'>
-J� 06e UJ4W VV
Mrzt
ti:Lt�L
v
Mei4a r
wh k k vv� CA",
DON `T'
al5k KA v
awwrosplu
275 11
f
s.�
9LZ
ON
3A
it 1
l mwe,
�,N
fin
DU
U!Ilemp jueaeom u edLui asi ew :ion° 3n m
A :)1i0,d
Policy 3 4T ; #5: Control exterkw kffit sources
DO'S
■ �r►�►.t� fri�,l,gld,�f1,�,
� �xcran l�i�k �auxr� ram
'ham. �` ►1.� �v� cA,hc� -
DON'T'S
! mid {G�1-
i�nak w� be re&-
! ,� �-, bV"�U
6w YG � C (, ' V`[. co (t7v-s,
amd w fewiaJ56,
awls.
YES
NO
y- r
h�
r
rI
WED H--E
�1 -= L�
p -
4
eel
23
277
POLICY 4
The City of Saratoga has had a
long- standing commitment to
the protection of views, both
from the hillsides to the Bay
Area and from the Santa Clara
Valley to the hillsides.
Structures should be designed
to blend in with the hill-
sides, not project above
ridgelines and hilltops, and
to respect the view from
neighboring or higher residen-
ces.
PRESERVE VIEWS AND ACCESS TO. VIEWS
278 24
Pc4cy 4 TWKNIQUE #t Locate structure to n**niM View blockage
DO'S
+fie m�or Lt+rm� p�r`ta�
• pvl-o ifne -eu�i�.-
I uaLit� �nGur�S
DOMY
0 l View
�stndwvy
• AVa►d us;K� CA
�us uric,
fxct.t viu.r -
279
Poy 4 TECHHOLIE #Zo MaxirMze view but avoid cow with pc
0
's
.t*, f,
. r
VOP 0 P I I �F
A
AP
280 as
Policy 4 E HMQ Locate structure to reduim heir
avm vlao m
DON'T''
i it
i
i
p
4
YES
4 '
N
281 27
POLICY 5
The Santa Clara Valley is
blessed with a climate that is
very conducive to the incor-
poration of energy- saving
techniques into residential
design. The purpose of this
policy is to promote the use
of such techniques to maximize
energy efficiency and conser-
vation in Saratoga. The tech-
niques should be considered in
initial design stage, and must
meet the State energy guide-
lines.
DESIGN FOR ENERGY EFFICIE,�'.•�Y'
282 28
Policy 5
TECHNIQUE #1: Design for maximum benefit of sun and wind
• ► ► '0
1 r + •��
i amcht el M6
to re ua- wad.
OSWX Z a.AAJ
{kj 44Z use. -h-cm, es
e- rcr� avu
�-
�v
-lam.
ems: d.ud l�rQ.0
IG
�
.f
Nq�IAp DIRECTJOIV
283
29
poilcy -5
TECHNIQUE #2.,.- Landscape, to control exposure to sun and wind
f VLAA
a�, mm�lllt
AZLa,tavi 4p WA-cz,(AA
I
-IL3LM
4!"
•l
D I
WINTER
Summm
30
PoNcy 5
MOMQUE : Aflaw Not, air and solar access to went hcows
�NPM di4n,v CC
u
It �.-
WA t v �f
s cf
r
5.fv
5
iy
r �
a
i _
N
- k
Norm skmie So,ith %Opa
285
Policy 5
TECHNIQUE Incorporate energy -wm devices into the design
i
r .1
P
i
R1
286
F
a
{
� a
_ i1r
9Y
EZr.h single- family t ..:.dential zoning
district in Saratoga m.:_ntains develop-
ment standards that ru,atA *o se-t.hacks
Pram property Lines, s.! c'•v rage,
he,ght of structures, ,sa a =n.owable
floor area. These stand ^F :s h r- hpon
developed to en5uxc that re51denti ::l
cor. to :c, lion conforxs wit + : ]hp Gc,neral
Plan yr_-,ils of naintair.ing the lo•.a-
d(•-,e_ _ y, rural - r- '•••• :rrot.i.il character of
the city, protecti .g vit=ws and privacy,
and iuOucinq envii- nmental impacts.
All new single - family residences and
additions or remodels to existing resi-
dencps :mist comply with these andards
before design review approval (-:,An he
granted. Although the Planning Comnis-
sion 1,<Lc, the authority to qrant
variar From these standards, appli-
c�*, _ not encouraged to purst.ie th
pi, • , to resolve design -rk,La 1
pre, s • s , variances can be qt-ar I
only wh-,n there is an ertr ,pn, or
unne °y hardship that results fru-
the f conditions of the ;itc,
such lot size, Lot shape,
topogra,hy, hydrology and vegetation.
This section of the Handbook provides
information on each residential zoning
standard, as follows:
I) Haight Limit
2) : etbacks
3) lmpe *_vnous Coverage
a) Allcwab'_e Floor Area
it also contains information on the
City's tt'tr- removal and fence
rega' ations.
RESIDENTIAL ZONING STANDARDS
33
:/
HEIGHT LIMIT
The height limit for single -
family residences in Saratoga is
26 feet. The height limit for
accessory structures is 12 feet.
These height limits apply to all
single - family residential zoning
districts.
The "height" of a structure is
measured as the vertical
distance from the highest point
of a structure to either the
natural grade or the finished
grade of the structure pad,
whichever is greater. Basements
and crawl spaces that are
located completely below grade
level are not included in the
height measurement, nor are
chimneys, flag poles, and
radio /television aerials.
r
FINISHED GRADE
NA�VRA� G�ApE 6, --
►sAT��A�' G
F�AD�
NATURAL GRADE
BASEMENT
34
288
DIAGRAM 2
ADDITIONAL SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
Fkmk*d 1 fI
Yw +7tt
!qj?# )(0W + 3.
Raqur d Yrd + 4ft
ExAE
t
i
net
%guyed Yad
�4f1
TABLE 2 - SETBACKS FOR ACCEcS;( 4%( STRUCTIFft-S
ACCESSORY
REQUIRE U SETBACK
STRUCTURE
I�
Fkmk*d 1 fI
Yw +7tt
!qj?# )(0W + 3.
Raqur d Yrd + 4ft
ExAE
t
i
net
%guyed Yad
�4f1
TABLE 2 - SETBACKS FOR ACCEcS;( 4%( STRUCTIFft-S
ACCESSORY
REQUIRE U SETBACK
STRUCTURE
Front
Side
Rear
Swimming pools
or mechanical
Same
as main structure
6' from
any
equipment
property
line
structure
Recreational
Same
as main structure
15' from
any
courts
property
line
Enclosed
structures
Height Setback
(cabanas,
8'
6'
garages, car-
Same
as main structure
9'
9'
ports, hobby
10'
12'
shops, etc.)
Enclosed
Height Setback
structure:si
6
with i,mx-
size of 250
Same
as main structure
8'
8'
sq. ft. (gar-
9,
91
den sheds,
10'
10'
structures
for swimming
pool equip-
ment and
similar)
Unenclosed
He_ fight Setback
Height
Setback
garden
Same as
8' 6'
e'
6'
structures
main
91 7e
91
7,
(gazebos,
structure
10' e'
10'
9,
lattice work,
arbors and
fountains)
Freestanding
Same
as main structure
No require -
solar panels
ment
(Less than 6' in
height)
Satellite dishes
Same as main structure
(less than 6' in
height)
Stables and corrals: 50'
--------------------------------
from any property line
-- H1_w064
50'
from dwelling units or
pools
50'
from a stream (in NHA
district)
289
II*1
IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE
To prevent the excessive
covering of residential lots
with structures and paving,
the City has adopted standards
for the allowable amount of
impervious coverage (Table 3).
"Impervious surface" means any
structure �>r hard surface
which substantially impairs
the natural permeability of
the soil, including (but not
limited to) solid surface
decks and patios, accessory
structures, swimming pools,
recreational courts, paved
driveways and parking areas,
and surfaces comprised of
clay, bricks with sand or
cement with gravel. The
allowable amount of impervious
coverage is expressed as a
percentage of the total lot
area.
TABLE 3 - COVERAGE STANDARDS
ZONING DISTRICT TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE
R- 1- 10,000
IIIAPERVK)US COVERAGE
7
Mein structure
2
Accessory structure
3
Dock
4
Driveway
5
Swirrwrl" pouf
6
Payed paths
TABLE 3 - COVERAGE STANDARDS
ZONING DISTRICT TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE
R- 1- 10,000
60%
R -1- 12,500
55%
R- 1- 15,000
50%
R- 1- 20,000
45% for hillside*
lots. For other
lots, 45%
plus an additional
5% if the
additional
coverage is used
for paths, decks
or patios.
R- 1- 40,000
35% for hillside*
lots. For other
lots, 35%
plus an additional
5% if the
additional
coverage is used
for paths, decks
or patios.
HC -RD
25% or 15,000 sq.
ft., whichever
is less.
NHR
25% or 15,000 sq.
ft., whichever
is less,
*A hillside lot is a lot having an average slope of 10% or greater.
37
290
DIAGRAM 3
ATTICS AND DOUBLE - COUNTED AREAS
— f
Attic space to be counted
�F3` 15
f
Double counted area
L -
Are-As inch.KJ -;-d In floor area calculation
1 Garage
2,3,4,5 Livhg area
4
6 Covered & enclosed area 1 z 3
6
7 Porches, decks and - -'
balconies - EAckxied Lower` Floor
DIAGRAM 4 - SAMPLE FLOOR AREA CALCULATION
1.7
Upper Floor
For a lot having a gr,:ss site area of 1.2 acres (52,272 sq. ft.) and
an average site slope of 27 %, the allowable floor area is calculated
as follows:
SLOPE AWUSTMENT
From 'Fable 5: For 20.01 -30% slope - 30% plus 3% for each L percent
of slope Over 20%
slope: 27%
Less: 20t
7% x 3% = 21%
Percentage of lot deducted: 30% + 21% = 51%
Lot area deducted: 51% x 52,272 = 26,659 sq. ft.
Net site area: 52,272 - 26,659 - 25,623 sq, ft.
,.o-,IIR AREA
From Table 4: For 15,001- 40,000 sq. ft. - 4,050 sq. ft. plus 78
sq. ft. for each 1,000
sq. ft. of net site
area over 15,000 sq.ft.
291
Net site area: 25,623 sq. ft.
Less: 15,0'00
10,623 1,000 = 10.6(round up to 11)
Plus: 11 x 78 sq. ft. = 858 sq. ft.
Allowable floor area: 4,050 + 858 = 4,908 sq. ft.
39
TREE RE MCNAL REGULATIONS
duchy ox the att'ractivene4a or
Saratoga I C_ attribiltable to
1150 .00.0dnd i, i 115 idea and the
Live and uroamant -ni trees
.,t�atta red hhrouriholi t thA City,
The prosarVa t ion of these
t.ri�cs 1S6 n uc:(P;,"ry .for tTW
health, safet? and welfare of
the residents. of the i=itY ift
order to pres.erve scenic
beauty, prevent erasion of
tops-oil, protect agairGat flood
bazar& and thu risk of land-
!n i jdam,w cn4ntnract I L4 t.4W_
in the air, maintain the c�i-
matic balance and decrease
wind velocities. To this end,
the city has .adapted tree reg-
C.latiOns f0t MW rumova..l of
traeg• ViLikin the City tihrticle
15 -54 of the pity Code}..
A `free Removal Permit, lssged
by the Planning D i rfec for , is
required for the removal of
trans QVRr a Cortairz ME
per'mtt apps icat j ona aro re-
vie-wed and determined accor-
dinq to sp*cJ 11c uritaria, and
ar, on-sate inspe.ctlan by the
Ct ty l �. Mn L nti2nanCu filppartruih t
i a required prior to approval
of the permit. HeighborinPg
propoirt el will be ihotifiod of
t ha &PPP i e'h t,'LUh a and the deci-
sion of the planninq UiractaT
may be appaa•l ed to the Plan-
ning Commission. Trio Cl ty may
rugmlm that A k- epiacefteht
tree be planted, as .a condittan
of the pormit. approval.
Tree removal perrrnii requ'ared fnr,.
Oak frees
r
v _P01A
At
jeeM
All ailker Irees
Applicalinns are revie-wed and deb -ormined on the basis of
the following vriterW
1 M 'M* aand k ton or tRa trdpQ 6rEth reaUv*:V trn diasia�d,. Direst
danger of fa 1 1 knq pr" 1 m 1 t Y tQ *j& ist i ' car p�
proqad strvrtareA
and inLarg'erer=e WilLh utility 216rvf313..
2 ) i'hIll rs[-reaai tl to remove the tree rar &0GT»l1 Or DMO r
anJoymant i2f "a proparty.
J) 'Cho t opog-cop" i5f the i■ nd an4 tho of feet ut k he t rtie tamoVa l
Upon wrowipm sat l rakantiEM and Ella divarsi mn ar tncr4®rr,d d Eaw
of dorEwce Voters.
11 no ni'mber, dpecied, n12e emd lnaeatldh 61 existirug tvomn to
ma area amd tha a t to rf tho rdary+a1 W- Ad h-aw upon shadip. far f t+i cy
Impact, Bcanle heautyr, proper y+ values, Ord aLnyf InOtA rlLikkie l
Gtana4r4a Of the Arnme
S1 Th& Rubber f healthy trues the prod+ &rty La "Id! t.a support
xccprdjroq to good lurm ®trV pr4Cti es_
292
40
FENCE REGULATIONS
HEIGHT FrrSTRICTIONS
FOR FENW S ANU WALLS LOCATED WiT1*0 REC.A. F'D YARDS
Exterior
= nterior
Fence
Front
Rear Side
S' -de
Comments
Location
Yard
Yard Yard
Yard
Any lot
]'(1l
6' 3
6'
Pilaster: may
exceed he'' -ght
by 2 ft.
Along main
arse, -ia?s
lfeight
Setback Height Setback
6'
Subject to Plan
;2; (3)
ning Director
8'
10' 8' Of
approval
9
15' 9' 5'
11}'
2.0' 10' 10'
Along
Scenic Fi -sigh, B¢theck 6' Subject to Plan -
Highways s' 15' min. ping Director
(3)(4)(5) up to i.00' approval
it
Retuning
wars on
hillside
lots 5' S' 5' 5'
Recrea-
tional Not 10' Not Not
courts Allowed Allowed Allowed
r
(1) Fences or compact hedges at the sight distance across street
intersection shall not exceed 3' in height.
(2) Prospect Road, Saratoga - Sunnyvale Road, Quito Road, Saratoga Avenue,
and Cox Avenue.
(3) Chain link, plastic and wire fencing are not allowed.
{4) Landscaping and maintenance of the exterior side of the fence is
required.
(5) Highway 9.
293
The hek}ht of a fence, wadi or hedge is measured by
a vertrc, line from 4he highest po[nt io a bon[
directly below at either the natura4 or frrxshed grade,
whichever is flower
�_ 1d
7Ft
s �
hr - 1
11 II
SIGHT DISTANCE
r
Area of aft. height restriction