HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-02-1988 City Council Staff ReportsSARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO qD G
MEETING DATE: —March 1988
ORIGINATING DEPT: Engineering
AGENDA ITEM
CITY MGR. APPROVAL
SUBJECT: Proposed Guardrail Installation on Prospect Road
Easterly'of Miller Avenue _
Recommended Motion:
Authorize the installation of appoximately 170 lineal feet of guardrail along
southerly side of Prospect Road easterly of Miller Avenue.
Report Summar
As a result of a request by Audrey Hildebrand of 19519 Eric Drive (backs up to
Prospect Road), we'have reviewed the possibility of installing a guardrail along
the southerly side of Prospect Road in back of her property and the property to the
west of hers. There have been three vehicles that have gone out of control and
crashed 'into the fences at the rear of these properties. There is also a bus stop
along with a bench in'this area. A guard rail would keep out of control vehicles
(most lose control while making a left from SB Miller onto EB Prospect) from going
into the fences or bus stop bench. The Public Safety Commission supports the instilla-
tion of the guardrail.
Fiscal Impacts:
The estimate cost of installing 170 L.F. of standard guardrail would amount
to $8,500, which is not presently budgeted. If this amount couldn't be appropriated
at the present, then it should be included in the FY 1988 -89 budget,
Attachments:
1. Memo from Community Services Director (Public Safety Commission).
2. Staff Report with attachments.
Motion and Vote:
/4� n{
7988
13777 FRUITVF.LE AVENUE • SARATOGA. C:\IAFORNIA 95070
(408) 867- :3,1 :38
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
February 11, 1988 Karen Anderson
Martha Clevenger
Joyce Hlava
To: Bob Shook David Moyles
From: Community Services Director Donald Peterson
Subject: Installation of Guardrail along Specified Portion of
Prospect Avenue near Miller Avenue
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is in response to your memorandum of January 22, 1988,
concerning the above referenced subject. The Public Safety
Commission considered this request at their regular meeting of
February 8, 1988.
During their deliberations, the PSC heard testimony from Audrey
M. Hildebrand and Janet Fontenot. Both Saratoga residents, which
live along Prospect Avenue and requested the guardrail in front
of their property, testified that numerous traffic accidents had
presented a danger to themselves and to their property and felt
the guardrail would protect their properties from accidental
vehicle intrusions. In the course of their-testimony, they also
expressed their concerns about the location of the bus stop.
They felt the bus stop should be relocated away from their
property due to the numerous vehicle accidents which have
occurred at the.corner of Miller and Prospect Avenues.
After considering the testimony from the two Saratoga residents
along with your staff recommendation, the PSC decided to support
your staff recommendation and recommend to the Council that 170
feet of guardrail be installed along Prospect Avenue from the
intersection of Miller Avenue to Mrs. Hildebrand's easterly
property line, leaving a 5 foot opening at the bus stop for
access to the buses.
With regards to Mrs. Hildebrand's concerns about the location of
the bus sto.p, the Commission noted in your report that the matter
was discussed a number of years ago by both the Santa Clara
County Transportation Agency and the City of Saratoga, resulting
in the bus stop being retained in its present location. The PSC
further noted that the guradrails would also afford a certain
level of protection to the bus stop, and did not feel it was
justified to reopen the deliberations in that matter.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Todd W. � Argor
jm
CC: PSC
City Manager
0919W o1 0&iaZUQ)0&
13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE • SARATOGA. CALIFORNIA 95070
(408) 887 -3438
MEMORANDUM
TO: Public Safety Commission DATE: 01 -22 -88
FROM: City Engineer
SUBJECT: Traffic Problem - South Side of Prospect Road
Easterly of Miller Avenue
We have been requested, by Audrey M. Hildebrand of 19519 Eric Drive
(backs up to.Prospect Rd.) to look into installing a guard rail across
the length of her back yard. This request comes as a result of out
of control vehicles crashing into her fence. Her fence has been hit
three (3) times in the past 5 years (Collision Diagram is attached).
There is a Santa Clara County Transit District bus stop and bench
located in a very close proximity to the collision points, which is of
more concern than the fence.
Based on the types of collisions at this location it is recommended
that 170 lineal feet of guard rail be installed along the back of curb
from the curb return at Miller Avenue to Mrs. Hildebrand's easterly
property line, leaving a five foot opening at the bus stop bench for
access. The cost of this installation would be approximately $8,500.00
and would probably have to be budgeted in FY 1988 -89, unless the council
would feel it necessary to appropriate the amount, for an earlier install-
ation.
It must be considered that the installation of a guard rail at this
location may trigger additional requests for the placement of guard
rails along not only Prospect Road, but other locations as well.
With regards to Mrs. Hildebrand's concerns of the bus stop location a
number of years ago, this was reviewed by both Santa Clara County
Transportation Agency and.the City of Saratoga, resulting in the bus
stop being retained at its present location.
Ro Shook
Ci Engineer
Attachments
CITY OF SARA TOGA
COLLISION DIAGRAM
SOuTHERL Y S/06 OF 464S7,6,e[ y
doA0JPEC T ROAD - 1W11_ L ER Ave vue
PER10D:4Years_ / /Alo.r /!,s FROM:_ C &7U ry /, /983 TOE Novcrn6er SO, /987
PREPARED BY: DATE 11130187
:U ,II hl I Il l
I I EI IIII- •
I,u IIII -
�I I III I
1 u it I � SCALE:
/0 C T -
N
i
.a �• .� � �` ate$ �
ROM .� �...�
C � ` ti B�
� Q
841.1 ny 20SG
•r,' Sp T r'.ve
I I UI
I ill
I ul It
• I ( i I Ij h
(`
Is If II
I v jI li Ij
I
If
I I II II
I•I II II I
:, IIII
I I U ly
1 111 ��
NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS
2 PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY
I
m INJURY �A r.&*aI
4 TOTAL AOCIDENTS
" TreeS Fence /r.« Ft�ce -
SYMBOLS
44--- MOVING VEHICLE
IN& BACKING VEHICLE
NON-INVOLVED VEHICLE
�6 - + +- PEDESTRIAN
r= PARKED VEHICLE
U FIXED OBJECT
FATAL ACCIDENT
O INJURY ACCIDCNT
TYPES OF COLLISIONS
REAR ENO
- •iiws_ HEAD ON
-07 — SIDESWIPE
,�• OUT OF CONTROL
LEFT TURN
"^ RIGHT ANGLE
SHOW FOR
EACH ACCIDENT
I: TIME Of DAY, DAY& DATE
2 WEATHER AND ROAD SURF
-IF UNUSUAL CONDITION
EXISTED
3 KITE - IF BETWEEN DUSK
AND DAWN .
.� II
i I i II
.i • } III t 1 .
11 i1
.. � � _ _. \ �O a �'�' o'CG►i7 � �� hg�¢�'L�o •� � l l
= 3 7 VOS*
II11
• � 1111
_ 1111
A \
II I• I
1111' Ni
U
IIII IN;
1111 ,
�I I
III( I
it I I
it
ly.11�
II II •',
i tEt.zitd ED
-OCT 2 9 1987
C �W o� MO &431 T T
13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA 95070
008) 8(37 -34 :38
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Karen Anderson
October 29, 1987 Martha Clevenger
Joyce Hlava
David Moyles
To: City Engineer Donald Peterson
From: Community Services Director
Subject: Request for Guard Rail on Prospect at Intersection
of Miller
--------------------------- T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Attached is a letter dated October 26, 1987, from Mrs. Audrey M.
Hildebrand requesting that the City determine the feasibility of
installing a guard rail on Prospect Road running the length of
her backyard near the intersection of Miller Avenue. Since the
letter is to the Public Safety Commission, I will be recommending
that the Commission refer this matter to your department before
making any final recommendations to the Council. P1 ease note
that Mrs. Hildebrand is requesting the City to expedite her
request..
If you have any questions, please contact me.
... W. Argo —
jm
Attachment
cc: Public Safety Commission
City ;na;get
��p
(59UW 92 0 &UQ)0&
13777 FRUITVALE A ENUE • SARATOGA. CALIF•'OR *fIA 95070
(108) 667 -3 -138
4 ttG.���l Ea COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Karen gO CT 2 9 1987 tc er
October 29, 1987 , Davy
ENGINEERING E DEPT, id Moyles
Donald Peterson
Audrey M. Hildebrand
1,9519 Eric Drive
Saratoga, CA 95070
Dear Mrs. Hildebrand:
This is in response to your letter dated October 26, 1987, to the
Saratoga. Public Safety Commission requesting the installation of
a guard rail on Prospect Road running the length of your backyard
near the intersection of Prospect and Miller Avenue.
Your letter has been referred to our Engineering Department for a
staff analysis and recommendation on your request. -.The staff
recommendation will be presented to the Public Safety Commission
along with your original request for their consideration.
Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Erman
Dorsey., - Engineering Department Traffic Technician, at 867-34.38,
ext. 19.
Very truly yours.,
Todd_ W. Argi
Community Services Director
jm
cc: Public Safety Commission
City Manager
Erman Dorsey
Saratoga Public Safety Commission
13777 Fruitvale Ave.
Saratoga, CA 95070
To Whom It May Concern:
19519 Eric Drive
Saratoga, CA 95070
October 26, 1987
I am an 18 year Saratoga resident 1•iving in a house on Eric Drive which has a
back yard bordering on Prospect Road.
In 1986, a driver of a car going South on Miller Ave.and turning onto Prospect Road
at a high rate of speed, crashed into my fence and a brick post, knocking down trio
trees in back of the next door neighbors property. If the car had not been stopped
by the trees, post and fence, it would have probably crashed into the house.
On September 14, 1987 at 10:30A.M., a driver of a car going South on Miller Ave.
and turning East onto Prospect Road at.a high rate of speed,.knocked down a 12 ft..
pine tree,hit and cracked a (wooden) fence post, and shattered a section of the
fence which is only a few feet away trom the bus stop. if the car had not been
stopped by the tree and the 4'x8' fence post, it wou'id probably have crashed into
the house.
I am sti.l.l attempting to settle with the Insurance Company and it has been six
weeks of telephone calls and frustation. My back yard is at the point of trajectory
where the cars that speed and /or run the red light at the intersection of Miller
and Prospect cannot be gotten under control and straightened out at that point of
the curve.
I request that a study be undertaken to determine the feasibility of installing a
guard rail on Prospect Road running the length of my back yard. This shuuld be
done as soon as possible. -
If a.guard is not installed in that area, there is a probability that a person in
my yard, or-a person walking on Prospect Road or waiting torn a bus in that area
could be seriously injured the next time an out of control^lits a tree, post, fence
or whichever. Because of this danger, the bus stop should be relocated to Miller Ave.
(near Prospect) where it was located originally before it was moved to the present
site. 80% of the riders waiting at that particular bus stop are children who must
walk on heavilly travelled Prospect Road because there is no sidewalk in that area
Children cross Prospect Road at the corner light to go to school and also to cross
the street to go to the Saratoga side when alighting from the bus' which stops on
the opposite side.
Therefore, relocating the bus stop to the original area on Miller Ave.'and elim-
inating the bus stop in the'-back of'my property appears to be in the best interests
of all concerned. This is.a very serious matter which requires immediate attention
from the Safety Commission.
Very truly yours,'
�1 X,
Audrey.M. Hildebrand
Ll ;
l
Ql� �
cam' � � PrQoSf�ry` �Pv � al
�. �-17 .5' 9
T�
I
y
i�Z
a
z
ji
i ^I
l
p Us srm
c
cam' � � PrQoSf�ry` �Pv � al
�. �-17 .5' 9
T�
I
y
i�Z
r
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:_ I�f- AGENDA ITEM
M
4xvrr,,,
EETING DATE:_March g, J2R CITY MGR APPROVAL
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: M�,ten�ce ��pLrt�nent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT: ADDITION OF PERMANENT PART -TIME CUSTODIAL AIDE
------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
Recommended Motions
r�
Approve recommendation to add a Permanent Part -Time Custodial
Aide.
Reoort m_m_r
Suav
The City's agreement with PERS states that no person be allowed
to work more than 1,000 hours oer fiscal year without being under
PERS. Our current custodial helper, Mark Stockwell has already
this year worked 585 hours for the Maintenance Department and 385
hours for the Recreation Department, a total of 970 hours. This
means he can work only 70 more hours, after which we would have
to lay him off and hire someone new. The position of custodian
helper has been difficult to fill with dependable, trustworthy
people. We have found that Mark does an excellent job and is
very dependable. In order to retain him, we request that this
temporary part -time position be made permanent, subject to City
benefits, including PERS.
Fiscal_Im_oact
Total increased cost to the City will _run between 20% and 30%
depending on the employee's choice of benefit options. No budget
increase is anticipated at this time.
l.'"Resolution Authorizing Addition to Permanent Positions
2. Memo to City Council
3. Job Description
4. Salary Schedule
Motion and Vote
0
OTTE 02 O&M °
13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE • SARATOGA. CALIFORNIA 95070
(408) 867 -3438
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Dan Trinidad
DATE:March 2, 1988
SUBJECT: Addition of Part -Time Permanent Custodial Aide
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
Because of the City's agreement with PERS that no person be
allowed to work more than 1,000 hours per fiscal year without
being under PERS and the fact that the current custodial helper,
Mark Stockwell, has proven to be an exceptional employee for both
the Maintenance Department and the Recreation Department, where
his combined time will exceed that maximum, we request that this
position be expanded to Permanent Part -Time Custodial Aide
budgeted at 1/2 time.
RECOMMENDED•ACTION
Authorize the addition of Permanent Part -Time Custodial Aide at
Range 14, ($956 to $1220 per month). The total cost to the City
will increase approximately 205 to 30% depending on the
employee's choice of optional benefits. As a half time employee,
we don't anticipate an overall budget adjustment will be
necessary, however, some shifting of funds from one department to
another may be needed at year's end.
BACKGROUND
Originally this position was budgeted for 1,000 hours, Mark has
already this year worked 585 hours for the Maintenance Department
and 385 hours for the Recreation Department, a total of 970
hours. This means he can work only 70 more hours, after which we
would have to lay him off and hire someone new. The position of
custodian helper has been difficult to fill with dependable,
trustworthy people. We have found that Mark does an excellent
job and is very dependable. In order to retain him, we request
that this temporary part -time position be made permanent, subject
to City benefits, including PERS.
City of Saratoga
CUSTODIAN AIDE
(Part - time)
DEFINITION
March, 1988
Positions in the classification of Building Maintenance Custodian
Aide perform routine unskilled tasks in connection with
janitorial maintenance. Depending upon assignment and the shift
worked, work is performed independently or under direct
Supervision.
DISTINGUISHING CHARACHERISTICS
This is a part -time entry level janitorial classification
requiring no previous experience. It is distinguished from the
next higher class of Building Maintenance Custodian in that the
duties of the latter include performance of minor structural
building maintenance tasks and some work direction to temporary
or Dart time custodians.
EXAMPLES OF WORK
(The duties listed below represent examples of work performed and
are not all- inclusive of duties which are or may be assigned this
classification.)
Performs a full range of janitorial tasks associated with
cleaning offices and public buildings. These include:
mopping, cleaning and waxing floors; dusting and waxing
furniture and counters; cleaning and restocking restrooms;
moving furniture; emptying trash; washing windows; and
vacuuming and shampooing carpets.
- Opens and secures buildings and sets up for meetings and
events. May supervise building rentals assuring the building
policies and rules are maintained by all people using the
building.
QUALIFICATIONS
Abil.ity to: Learn and maintain proper standards of cleanliness
in assigned areas; work independently; learn to use material,
tools and equipment safely and effectively; perform Dhysical
labor, including periodic heavy labor; follow verbal and
written instructions; work extended or irregular hours or split
shifts; maintain basic records; and work effectively with other
staff and with the public.
Education and Experience: Sufficient education and experience
to satisfactorily perform the duties of this classification. A
typical qualifying background would be completion of the eighth
grade.
RANGE POSITION
102 Accountant
63 Account Clerk
87 Admire. Secretary
111 Assist. Civil Engineer
102 Assistant -Planner
114 Associate Planner
114 Building Inspector
62 Build.-Maint. Custodian
47 Clerk Typist I
56 Clerk Typist II
65 Clerk Typist III
85 Community Service Off.
92 Deputy City Clerk
38 Japanese Gr.dn. Caretaker
94 Japanese Grdn. Special.
69 Parks Maint. Worker I
84 Parks Maint. Worker'II
89 Parks Maint. Worker III.
117 Plans Examiner
114 Public Works Inspector.
89 Recreation Supervisor
71 Secretary
114 Senior Eng. Tech.
92 Street Maint'Leadworker
69 Street Maint. Worker I
84 Street-Maint. Worker II
54 Switchbd. Opr /Reception.
84 Volunteer-Coordinator
4o If", d�
A.Step
B Step
C Step
D Step
E Step
F Step
G Step
H Step
I Step
J Step
K Step
2,301
1561
2359
1600
2415
1638
2475
2538
2602
2662.
2728
2795
2865
2935
1982
2032
2,080
1679
2132
1722
2186
1765
2241
1806
2293
1851
2'350
1896
2408
1944
2,468
1991
' 2528
2672
2738
2803
2873
294 "7
3020
3090
3167
324.5
3327
3408
2301
2359
2415
24.75
2538
2602
2662
272.8
2795
2865
2935
2593
2593
2658
2658
.2721
2721
2789
2860
2932
2999
3074
3.150
3229
3307
1546
1584
- 1622
2789
1662
2860
1705
2:932
1747
2999
1788
3074
3150
3229
3307
1331
1365
1397
143,2
1468
1505
1540
1832
1578
1878
1617
1924
1658
1971
1.698
1456
1492
1528
1566
1606
1646
1684
1726
1769
1813
1857
1592
1632
1671
1713
175.6
1800
184.2
1888
1934
1983
2031
1943 .
2083
1992
2039
2090
2143
2197
2247
2304
2360
24.19
2478
21.35
1248
2186
1277
2241
2298
°2355
2410
2470
2531
2594
2657
.121.7
2125
2178,
2230
1309
2286
1343
2344
1376
2403
1408
2458.
1443
2519
-1479
2582.
1516
2646
1553
1657
1698
1739
1782
1828
1873.
1917
1965
2013
2063
2711
2114
1924
20.22
1972
2019
2122
2069
2122
2175
2225
.2281
2337
2395
2454
2672
..2072
2738
2803
2175
2873
22.30
2947
2286
3020-.
2339
3090
2397
3167
2456
3245
2518
3327
2579
2593
2658
2721
2789
2860
2932
2999
3074
3.150
-- 3229
3408
3307
2022 .
1690
2072
1733
2122
1774
21.75
2230.
2286
2339
2397
2456
2518
2579
2593
2658
2721
1818
2789
1864
2860
:1911..
2932
1955
2999
2004
3074
2053
3150
2105
2156
2083
2135
2186
2241
2298
2355
2410
2470
2531
3229
2594
3307
2657
1657
1924
1698
1739
1782
1828
1873
1917
1965
2013
2063
2114 `
14'27
1972
14.63
2019.
1498
2069
1535
2122.
1574
2175
2225
2281
2337
2395
• -2454
1924
1972
2019
2069
212.2
1614
2175
1651
2225
1692
2281
1734
2337
1777
1821
2454
.2395
SS6
�iFO
1 0ay
loTy
1a Flo.
/ /07
4.2
11,91
SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NO. ! q I)
MEETING DATE: 3 -16 -88
ORIGINATING DEPT: ENGINEERING
SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENTS ON AZULE PARK SITE - GOLETA AVENUE
Recommended Motion:
1. Approve request to advance funds for landscaping.
2. Approve improvement of Goleta and adopt resolution
appropriating funds.
Report Summary:
AGENDA ITEM
CITY MGR. APPROVAL
Greenbrier Homeowners Association has requested that their zone at the Lighting
and Landscaping District install landscaping along the Azule park site street frontage.
The cost is $3,400 and they further request that the City advance these funds and
be reimbursed by the District over a two -year period.
They have also suggested that for maximum benefit the City should consider completing
the street improvements.
Three alternatives are available in addition to the do nothing alternative 1) provide
final grades only for $9,000.00, 2) provide final grades and curb and gutter only for
$11,000.00,3) provide full improvements for $30,000.
One of these alternatives should be approved so landscaping would not be disturbed
for future construction.
Fiscal Imr)acts:
- $3,400 to be reimbursed by Light & Landscaping District.
- $9,000, $11,000, or $30,000 ($11,000 in sidewalk repair + $19,000 in pavement
management).
Attachments:
- Staff Report.
- Greenbrier Homeowner Association Request.
- Quote for landscaping.
- Appropriation Resolution.
Motion and Vote:
Eff
Qq
REPORT TO MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: 3 -10 -88
COUNCIL MEETING: 3 -16 -88
SUBJECT: Improvement on Azule Park Site
Goleta Avenue
Some time ago the Greenbier Homeowners and Taxpayers Association inquired
into providing landscaping along the unimproved frontage of the City owned park
site on Goleta Avenue. The installation and maintenance to be financed by the
existing Greenbrier zone of the Lighting and Landscaping District. They presented
a plan for planting which was reviewed and modified slightly by the Parks Super-
intendent.
We solicited quotes from local landscapers and found that the cost would be
$3,400 including the irrigation system. This was about twice what the association
had expected but they had not considered that the planting would require irrigation.
The association board did agree to the cost and has asked that we proceed. They
request that the City advance the funds for the landscaping and be reimbursed over
a two -year period through district assessments. The City has done this before in
the Manor Drive zone of the district.
To provide maximum benefit the Assocation has requested that the City finish
the improvements, i.e., curb, gutter and paving on this park frontage. This would
preclude the landscaping being damaged during some future street construction.
While finishing the improvements is desirable, it should be noted that
existing pavement provides for two lanes of traffic and one lane of parking. It,
therefore, is adequate to accommodate the light traffic demands on this street.
Staff has studied those possible alternatives relative to the improvements:
1 - Grade area to be landscaped to provide final grade so that landscaping
would not be disturbed in future. Estimate: $9,000.00
2 - Same as Item 1 plus install curb and gutter by current concrete
contractor. Street widening could be completed at a later
date. Estimate: $11,000.00
Page 2
3 -10 -88
3 - Same as items 1 and 2 plus construction of k street.
Estimate: $30,000.00
Alternate No. 3 is recommended. If approved, funding could be drawn
from the General Fund, Gas Tax or the Park Development Fund.
6),VA
Rober S. Shook
City Engineer
RSS /df
Attachments
cU t"
- /7
�-�- - V
_. -X CA 114 T! O/V AAAOl6,e,7 O /NC O/VZ Y
• fuf
J
V 24 Cu.6 f 4af�cr
_CU!- 6 G . 7 Tom%? : _AND G9i9. 0iiyG : ONC -Y "-
r�
i
y
6 '�99• �tt Roc,F
V24 Cu.6 e4gulle.-
4 "A99• 9-,,e �O-k
CA L . SE..0 7-101Y
-
C� 30, 000
GHTA
PfeSICeM. Marylee Hoiness
November 23, 1987
Mr. Robert Shook
City Engineer
City of Saratoga
13777 Fruitvale
Saratoga, CA 95070
Dear Mr. Shook:
NOV 2 5 1987
"INEERINC, r^.
• - • • • • iii ' *--T, « 707 is •
This is in response to our conversation of last week regarding
Greenbrier- Homeowners and Taxpayers Association's proposal for
development of the Azule Park area on- Goleta.
This matter was brought up at our November board meeting. I
reported to the members that the plan we had submitted to the
City of Saratoga earlier this year had been approved, and that
the lowest bid received from a licensed contractor was
$3,400.00. This bid included $1800 for an irrigation system and
the balance for plant material.
In discussing these improvements, Joyce Hlava mentioned that the
City of Saratoga has contractors doing cement work on sidewalks
in Saratoga and they might be able to help us finish off this
project. Our Board voted to ask the City of Saratoga to do a
joint venture with GHTA., whereby the city would do the cement
work on the curb and gutters at the Azule site and Greenbrier
would do the development of the site according to the plans
submitted for the $3,400.00 bid. We agree to make special
arrangements for this assessment through our maintenance park
district with a 2 year payback.
Naturally we are anxious to get this project started as soon as
possible to take advantage of the planting cycle. I appreciate
your presenting this beautification project to the City Council
for us. Please let me know the outcome.
It's been a pleasure working with you and your people.
Sincerely,
m
Marylee Hoiness
ORCHARD LANDSCAPING INC. DBA
Complete Garden Maintenance Service
P.O. Box 3436, Saratoga, CA 95070 -1436
(408) 374 -5253
September 2I, 1987
Bob Shook, City Engineer
City of Saratoga
13777 Fruitvale Ave.
Saratoga, Ca. 95070
AFFILIATED
WITH
CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO. 494793
MEMBER SAN JOSE LANDSCAPE
GARDENERS ASSOCIATION
ti 7 0
Job: Landscape Improvement, Goleta Ave., Saratoga
The undersigned proposes to furnish all materials labor, equipment
and supervision to complete the following work in a good and work-
manlike manner;-
Work designated on sketch plan provided, specifically.
a) Clean off weeds and haul away.
b) Fill wheel ruts by water meters with graded top soil,, and compact.
c) Install manual irrigation system consisting of I" main line,
3/4" Lateral line, approximately 45 Toro 570C -6P popup heads,
approximately 6 antisyphon brass valves set in 2 valve boxes, all
fittings included, pipes laid 8" deep. (Use of standard I2" shrub
risers inadvisable to prevent vandalism see copy of proposed
heads). Trenches backfilled and compacted.
d) Supply /install 13 - 5 gallon Fraximus 'Parviflora'
2 - 5 gallon Geijera 'Parviflora'
I00 - I gallon Rosmarinus
Each tree to have I/8 ft. lodgepole and tied.
All Nursery stock installed with agriform planting tablets and water
basins.
e) One application of pre - emergent herbicide - Ronstar- to inhibit weed
growth and reduce maintenance.
f) Water -in plants and clear up job site.
g) Contractor warrants Nursery stock 60 days.
Client or his agent will water daily until growth established.
Warranty void if this is not done.
Work as described above,
$3,400.00
Payment terms: 50;o progress, balance on submission of final account
Continued on pg 2
- I -
0AgHARD LANDSCAPING INC. DBA
�/��p�q/�i/�- -;.��7�''�r �n�' /y /per � - - -/By
1 V.g J<i.JJZ tl V i� d tl S Ji L.e l
Complete Garden Maintenance Service
P.O. Box 3436, Saratoga, CA 95070 -1436
(408) 374 -5253
Contunued from pg I
AFFILIATED
WITH
CONTRACTORS LICENSE hlo. 494793
MEMBER SAN JOSE LANDSCAP E
GARDENERS ASSOCIATION
Job: Landscape Improvement, Goleta Ave -, Saratoga
Any alteration or deviation from the plans and specifications will
be executed only upon written orders for same and will be added to
or deducted from the sum quoted in this contract. All additional
agreements must be in writing and no work will be scheduled until
the cost is agreed upon, approved by the client, signed and, if
extra to the work paid for.
Contractor agrees to carry Workmen's Compensation and.Public Liability
Insurance and to pay all taxes on materials and labor furnished under
this contract as required by Federal laws and the laws of the State of
California.
Re pectfully Subm' t fed,
Re -
Mervyn Salt 9/21/87
Contractors License No. 494793
Contractors are required by law to be Licensed and regulated by
The Contractors State License Board. Any questions concerning
a Contractor may be referred to the registrar of The Board whose
address is: Contractors State License Board
P.O. Box 26000 Sacramento, Calif. 95814
The purchaser, �rihase name appears hereon, agrees to pay for services
outlined above and in accordance with terms stated. In the event of
default the account shall bear interest at 2Y per month (annual
percentage rate 24/). Purchaser shall pay an y reasonable attorney's
fees and court costs incurred in recovering payment.
Mervyn.Salt Complete Garden Maintenance Service will not be responsible
for damage to property not visible where not specifically mentioned
herein, especially underground installations.
Acceptance
You are hereby authorized to complete the work described above, for
which the undersigned agre.es to pay the amount stated in said proposal
and according to the terms thereof.
FOR CITY OF S,ARATOGA DATE (sign and print name)
2 -
»t r e PAGE
TORO
IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
DRO SERIES 540 570D AND 570 SPRINKLER BODIES
mmon Model Features)
570C -6P
570 -HP
Inlet has 1h" N.P.T. thread
Applications
Applications
Maximmum working pressure,
75 PSI
Recommended operating range,
20 to 50 PSI
Very Tall Grasses
Very Tall Grasses
Ground Cover, Shrubs
Low Ground Cover, Shrubs
pP
570C -3P
Specifications,
Specifications
For low, close -cut grass
2.1nch pop-up with basket screen
Applications
. 6-1/4" Pop-up
. 12" Pop -up
'filter
Low. Close -cut Grass
•.Body Height - .8,1'/4"
.. Body Height -'16''
Body height; 43/16"
Specifications
..'Cap Diameter -2"
• Body Diameter - 1. 5/16"
•Cap Diameter 2"
• Nozzle Diameter - 7/8"
Accepts all Toro spray nozzles
'2 -Inch female N.P.T. threads
• 3.1/4" Pop-up
. Average -Flush Rate -
• Body Diameter - 1 -5/8"
Werage flush rate less than
• Body Height - 4 -3/4"
<•.3 GPM
• Average Flush Rate • <.8 GPM
.3 G.P.M
r Cap Diameter -:2"
570 -6P
• Body Diameter - 1- 5/16"
'
OP
•Average Flush: Rate -
Applications '
plications .
<. 3 GPM
Very Teu Grasses
all Turf Applications
570C -4P
Low Ground Cover, Shrubs
ecifications
Applications
Specifications
•• Pop-up
Taller Grasses,
• 6" Pop-up
'
ody Height - 4 -7/8"
Ground d -Cover
• Body Height' - 8-1/4"
ep Diameter - 2"
Specifications
• Body and Cap Diameter 1- 6%18"
'
Ionia Diameter - 7/8'•
• Stabilizing Flange (Optioneq
Diameter • 1.5/8"
.4.1 /4" Pop -up
• Average Flush Rate - <.8 GPM
Spray N—tes
• Body Height - 6 -1/4"
ape Flush Rate - <.5 GPM
•-Cap Diameter . 2"
r
• Body Diameter -- 1,5/16"
2,
• Average Flush Rate -
<.3 GPM _—
}Irs'S=
LIM
570P 570C-3P-
570C -4P'
570 SERIES —
NOZZLES AND BODII
)LD SEPARATELY-.
570C -6P
570-6P
30001593 540P 2'I;N TORO POP -UP BODY 30001613 570C -6P TORO POP -UP C LIP .6 IN
30001610 570P TORO POP -UP BODY 3 .INCH- 30001.614 5706P TORO MED -POP BODY 6 INCH
100015!1 570C -1P TORO POP -UP C LIP 3 IN 10001620 570HP TORO HI -POP BODY 12 INCH
30001612 5700 -4P TORO POP -UP BODY 4 IN
300 SERIES - NOZZLES, TORO SERIES 300 - STREAM ROTOR®
ARC DISC AND BODIES
SOLD SEPARATELY. Specifications
Y ��a
t n�y 'gyp zi,
12" POP -UP
- '3" POP -UP
Shrub
• Inlet - 1/2" N.P.T. Female Thread'
• Recommended Operating Pressure - 35 -50 PSI
• Maximum Pressure - 75 PSI
• Overall Height - 6"
• Nozzle Diameter - 1.1 /2"
• Body Diameter -2
12'• Hi -Pop
• Pop -Up • 12"
• Pop -Up to Nozzle - 11 -3/4"
• Inlet,- 3/4" N.P.T. Female Thread
• Recommended Operating Pressure - 35 -50 PSI
• Maximum Pressure - 75 PSI
to Overall Height -16"
• Cap Diameter - 3" 30001700 300
• Body Diameter' - 2.1/4" 30001704 300
• Standard Locking Cap 30001708 300
30.0-
Specifications
3!. Pop-Up
Specifications
101
• a ts; 'i
Y
1 S t*i
N.
Orr
,
a 4
>I
570-HP
• Pop -Up - 3"
• Pop -Up to Nozzle:- 2.3/4"
• Inlet - 3/4" N.P.T. Female Thread
• Recommended'Operating Pressure - 35.50 PSI
• Maximum Pressure - 75 PSI
• Overall Height - 6 -1./B"
• Cap'Diameter - 3"
• Body Diameter . 2-1/4"
• Locking Cap Available - Part No. 36 -1344
- 00- 00'TORO S /ROTOR 11 /O NOZ
-10 -00 TORO SHRUB S /RT BODY'
12 IN S /RT BODY