Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-16-2015 Memo for Item 8        CITY OF SARATOGA   Memorandum        To: Saratoga City Council  From: Debbie Bretschneider, Acting City Clerk  Date: September 16, 2015   Subject: Item 8: Clarification of Co‐location Usage for Wireless Telecommunication Facilities   Following publication of the September 16, 2015 City Council Agenda Packet, staff received  questions regarding Item 8 – Appeal of a Design Review approval to install a new cellular  telecommunications facility on an existing building at 20455 Herriman Avenue. Via this memo, staff  would like to clarify information provided in the staff report.   To help clarify the public’s understanding of how the term co-location is used with regards to wireless facilities, staff is providing additional information in this memorandum. Under the City’s Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Ordinance (City Code Section 15-44) co- location is referenced in required finding (a): “That the Wireless Telecommunications Facility is or can be co-located with another Wireless Telecommunications Facility located on a structure or an existing utility pole/tower in the public right-of-way unless the applicant has demonstrated that such location is not technically or operationally feasible.” Additionally, the City keeps track of wireless applications based on property/parcel location so facilities physically on the same parcel are considered co-located at the same location. Co-location does not eliminate the need for the required findings in the City’s Ordinance to be satisfied in order to approve a Design Review application for a wireless facility. Under the “Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012”, the Federal government defines co-location as new antennas proposed to be installed on “eligible facilities.” An eligible facility as defined in the Act is an existing tower or base station (e.g. building) that currently has wireless antennas located on it. Co-location is only relevant as a defined term because new antennas may be exempt from local government review if they are co-located on an eligible facility and do not “substantially changes the physical dimensions of the existing wireless tower or base station.