HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-10-2010 Planning Commission PacketTable of Contents
Agenda 2
October 27, 2010
Draft minutes 4
PDR10-0005; 14091 Quito Road (403-22-004); T-Mobile (Sutro
Consulting) / PGE
Staff Report 6
Resolution 10
Neighbor Review 15
Notice 16
Mailing Addresses 17
RF Analysis 19
1
CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
DATE: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 - 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: Council Chambers/Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA
TYPE: Regular Meeting
ROLL CALL
Commissioners - Chair Mary-Lynne Bernald, Vice-Chair- Douglas Robertson, Joyce Hlava, David Reis, Linda
Rodgers, Tina K. Walia and Yan Zhao
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
MINUTES
Action Minutes from the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of October 27, 2010
ORAL COMMUNICATION
Any member of the Public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three minutes on matters not
on this agenda. The law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items.
However, the Planning Commission may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Planning
Commission direction to Staff.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS- PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTION TO STAFF
REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA
Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on November 4, 2010
REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS
If you wish to appeal any decision on this Agenda, you may file an “Appeal Application” with the City Clerk
within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15-90.050 (b).
All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. Applicants/Appellants and
their representatives have a total of ten minutes maximum for opening statements. Members of the Public
may comment on any item for up to three minutes. Applicant/Appellants and their representatives have a
total of five minutes maximum for closing statements.
PUBLIC HEARING
1. PDR10-0005; 14091 Quito Road (403-22-004); T-Mobile (Sutro Consulting) / PGE - The applicant is
requesting Design Review approval for a wireless telecommunication antenna on a wood utility pole. An
existing 29.7’ pole would be replaced with a 45’ 5” pole. The pole would be similar in height to other poles
in the vicinity. The facility is considered a “micro site” because the antennas and associated equipment are
smaller in size than a standard wireless facility. The antennas would be placed at the top of the pole and the
associated equipment would be placed on the ground.
2.
3. City Code Section 15-12.020 states any antenna facilities operated by a public utility for transmitting and
receiving cellular telephone and other wireless communications, is subject to design review under Article
15-46. The proposed wireless facility therefore requires Planning Commission review. (Cynthia
McCormick)
DIRECTORS ITEM
2
COMMISSION ITEMS
COMMUNICATIONS
ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING
- Wednesday, December 8, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers/Civic Theater
13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (408) 868-1269 or ctclerk@saratoga.ca.us. Notification 48 hours prior to
the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR
35.102-35.104 ADA Title II).
POSTING
Certificate of Posting of Agenda: I, Abby Ayende, Office Specialist for the City of Saratoga, declare that the
foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga was posted on November 4,
2010, at the office of the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 and was available for
public review at that location. The agenda is also available on the City’s website at www.saratoga.ca.us
If you would like to receive the Agenda’s via e-mail, please send your e-mail address to planning@saratoga.ca.us
NOTE: To view previous Planning Commission meetings anytime, go the City Video Archives at
www.saratoga.ca.us
3
CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION
ACTION MINUTES
DATE: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 - 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: Council Chambers/Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA
TYPE: Regular Meeting
ROLL CALL
Commissioners - Chair Mary-Lynne Bernald, Vice-Chair- Douglas Robertson, Joyce Hlava, David Reis, Linda
Rodgers, Tina K. Walia and Yan Zhao
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
MINUTES
Action Minutes from the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of September 22, 2010 (Approved, 5:0:2(Reis and
Rodgers abstain))
ORAL COMMUNICATION
Any member of the Public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three minutes on matters not
on this agenda. The law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items.
However, the Planning Commission may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Planning
Commission direction to Staff.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS- PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTION TO STAFF
REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA
Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on October 21, 2010
REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS
If you wish to appeal any decision on this Agenda, you may file an “Appeal Application” with the City Clerk
within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15-90.050 (b).
All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. Applicants/Appellants and
their representatives have a total of ten minutes maximum for opening statements. Members of the Public
may comment on any item for up to three minutes. Applicant/Appellants and their representatives have a
total of five minutes maximum for closing statements.
PUBLIC HEARING
1. PDR10-0016; 18628 McFarland Ave - The applicant requests Design Review approval for a new single-
story single-family dwelling with attached garage. The total proposed floor area is 2,958 square-feet and
the height is approximately 21 feet. The lot is 10,000 square feet and the site is zoned R-1-10,000. (Cynthia
McCormick) (Approved, 7:0)
DIRECTORS ITEM
COMMISSION ITEMS
COMMUNICATIONS
ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING – ADJOURNED 7:25 PM
- Wednesday, November 10, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers/Civic Theater
13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA
4
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (408) 868-1269 or ctclerk@saratoga.ca.us. Notification 48 hours prior to
the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR
35.102-35.104 ADA Title II).
POSTING
Certificate of Posting of Agenda: I, Abby Ayende, Office Specialist for the City of Saratoga, declare that the
foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga was posted on October
21,2010, at the office of the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 and was available for
public review at that location. The agenda is also available on the City’s website at www.saratoga.ca.us
If you would like to receive the Agenda’s via e-mail, please send your e-mail address to planning@saratoga.ca.us
NOTE: To view previous Planning Commission meetings anytime, go the City Video Archives at
www.saratoga.ca.us
5
Application PDR10-0005; 14091 Quito Road
REPORT TO THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
Meeting Date: November 10, 2010
Application Type / No: Design Review / PDR10-0005
Location / APN: 14091 Quito Road / 403-22-004
Applicant/Owner: T-Mobile (Sutro Consulting) / PGE
Staff Planner: Cynthia McCormick, Assistant Planner, AICP
Department Head: John F. Livingstone, AICP
14091 Quito Road
6
Application PDR10-0005; 14091 Quito Road
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CASE HISTORY
Application filed: 05/12/10
Application complete: 06/14/10
1st Notice published: 06/29/10
1st Public Hearing (continued): 07/14/10
2nd Notice published: 10/26/10
Mailing completed: 10/28/10
Posting completed: 11/04/10
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a wireless telecommunication antenna on a
wood utility pole. An existing 29.7’ pole would be replaced with a 45’ 5” pole. The pole would be
similar in height to other poles in the vicinity. The facility is considered a “micro site” because the
antennas and associated equipment are smaller in size than a standard wireless facility. The antennas
would be placed at the top of the pole and the associated equipment would be placed on the ground.
City Code Section 15-12.020 states any antenna facilities operated by a public utility for transmitting
and receiving cellular telephone and other wireless communications, is subject to design review under
Article 15-46. The proposed wireless facility therefore requires Planning Commission review.
PROJECT DATA
ZONING: R1-10,000
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: M-10
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed project, which includes installation of new cellular equipment, is categorically exempt
from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 of the Guidelines for
Implementation of CEQA. This Class 3 exemption applies to new construction and installation of small,
new equipment and facilities in small structures.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find this application exempt from CEQA and approve
the application for Design Review with required findings and conditions by adopting the attached
Resolution. Staff is not recommending any permanent conditions for this project.
7
Application PDR10-0005; 14091 Quito Road
PROJECT DISCUSSION
Project Description
The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a wireless telecommunication antenna on a
wood utility pole. The facility is considered a “micro site” because the antennas and associated
equipment are smaller in size than a standard wireless facility. An existing 29.7’ pole would be replaced
with a 45’ 5” pole. The increase in height is needed for coverage, clearance over adjacent trees, and
clearance from existing power lines. The pole would be similar in height to other utility poles in the
vicinity. Three (3) panel antennas and one (1) GPS antenna would be enclosed in a radome at the top of
the pole. The associated equipment would be placed on the ground. A new 18” tall railroad tie retaining
wall would be placed around the sides and rear of the equipment cabinet. The sides and rear of the
cabinet would also be screened by new 5 gallon juniper shrubs in accordance with recommendations by
the City Arborist. Shrubs cannot be placed in front of the cabinet because the applicant must maintain a
minimum four feet of sidewalk clearance while still remaining in the public right-of-way (rather than
private property).
Proposed Exterior Materials and Colors
The new wood pole would look like the existing pole in terms of colors and materials. The antenna and
equipment cabinet would be painted a brown color to match the color of the pole, as shown in Exhibit B.
Noise-Generating Devices
Associated equipment would be housed within a cabinet, reducing any noise impacts. The facility will
be required to comply with City noise standards.
Location and Alternative Sites
The new pole would replace an existing utility pole located in the public right-of-way along Quito Road
near Marshall Lane. The applicant considered two other utility poles in the vicinity. However these
poles already had equipment on them, making them a less attractive alternative. Furthermore, the two
alternative poles were not approved by PG&E for additional equipment. The proposed pole matches the
height of the alternative poles that were not chosen.
Site Description and Surrounding Land Uses
The facility is located on Quito Road between Pollard Road and Marshall Lane. It is surrounded by
residential uses.
Correspondence and Neighbor Review
The public hearing notice was mailed to property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. The
applicant also distributed information to the four adjacent properties. Only one response was returned.
This neighbor was concerned with the height of the equipment cabinet which was originally proposed to
be located on the pole approximately seven feet above ground. The applicant has relocated the
8
Application PDR10-0005; 14091 Quito Road
equipment to the ground to be less conspicuous. The neighbor is satisfied with this solution. Staff has
not received any other comments. (Attachment 2)
FCC Requirements
Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has
exclusive jurisdiction over RF emissions from personal wireless antenna facilities. The City can evaluate
and regulate only the aesthetic aspects of wireless installations. Any concerns regarding health or safety
aspects of the wireless sites are not within the purview of the Planning Commission. Pursuant to its
authority under federal law, the FCC has established rules to regulate the safety of emissions from these
facilities.
The applicant has provided a Radio Frequency (RF) Analysis (Attachment #3) which concludes that the
proposed telecommunications facility will comply with the FCC’s current prevailing standard for
limiting human exposure to RF energy, and no significant impact on the general public is expected. A
condition has been added to the attached resolution that the applicant must meet all requirements
established by the FCC.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the proposed wireless facility (Application
PDR10-0005) by adopting the attached Resolution.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution of Approval
2. Neighbor comments, public hearing notice, and mailing labels
3. Radio Frequency Analysis
4. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A"
5. Photo simulations, Exhibit "B"
9
CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. FOR APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIEW
Application # PDR 10-0005
T-Mobile (Sutro Consulting)
The City of Saratoga Planning Commission finds and determines as follows with respect to the
above-described application:
I. Project Summary
The City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review (PDR)
approval for the Project shown in Exhibit "A" date and Photo Simulations denominated Exhibit “B”
stamped November 1, 2010, incorporated by this reference. The applicant is requesting Design
Review approval for a wireless telecommunication antenna on a wood utility pole. The antennas
would be placed at the top of the pole and the associated equipment would be placed in a cabinet on
the ground. The foregoing use will be described as the “Project” in this Resolution.
II. Design Review Requirement
City Code Section 15-46.020(a)(7) requires Design Review Approval for any new antenna facility
operated by a public utility for transmitting and receiving cellular telephone and wireless
communication. This Design Review Approval requirement implements the Saratoga General Plan,
including but not limited to: Land Use Goal 13 which provides that the City shall use the Design
Review process to assure that new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the
site and the adjacent surrounding.
III. Planning Commission Review
On November 10, 2010 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing on the Project
at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence
and argument. The Planning Commission considered the Project, the staff report on the Project,
CEQA documentation, correspondence, presentation from the Applicant and the public, and all
testimony and other evidence presented at the Public Hearing.
IV. Environmental Review
The Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. Section 15303). Class 3 exemptions include installation
of equipment and facilities, such as wireless facilities.
V. Design Review Findings
The findings required for issuance of a Design Review Approval pursuant to City Code Section 15-
46.040 are set forth below and the Applicant has met the burden of proof to support making all of
those required findings:
10
2
Application No. PDR 10-0005
(a) Where more than one building or structure will be constructed, the architectural features and
landscaping thereof shall be harmonious. Such features include height, elevations, roofs,
material, color, and appurtenances. This finding can be made in the affirmative. No buildings
are associated with this project. The new utility pole is similar in height and color to other poles
in the vicinity.
(b) Where more than one sign will be erected or displayed on the site, the sign shall have a
common or compatible design theme and locational positions and shall be harmonious in
appearance. This finding is not applicable because no signs are proposed.
(c) Landscaping shall integrate and accommodate existing trees and vegetation to be preserved;
it shall make use of water-conserving plants, materials and irrigation systems to the
maximum extent feasible; and, to the maximum extent feasible, it shall be clustered in
natural appearing groups, as opposed to being placed in rows or regularly spaced. This
finding can be made in the affirmative. The applicant will provided landscape screening around
the proposed cabinet. The owner is responsible for the maintenance of existing landscaping.
(d) Colors of wall and roofing materials shall blend with the natural landscape and be
nonreflective. The cabinet will be painted to match the pole and blend with the natural
landscape.
(e) Roofing materials shall be wood shingles, wood shakes, tile, or other materials such as
composition as approved by the Planning Commission. No mechanical equipment shall be
located upon a roof unless it is appropriately screened. This finding is not applicable because
no roofing is proposed and no equipment will located on a roof. The proposed equipment will
be placed in a cabinet on the ground.
(f) The proposed development shall be compatible in terms of height, bulk, and design with other
structures in the immediate area. This finding can be made in the affirmative. The new utility
pole is similar in height and color to other poles in the vicinity.
VI. Project Approval
After careful consideration of the application, site plan, architectural drawings, and other materials
and exhibits and evidence submitted to the City in connection with this matter, the project is
approved subject to the conditions set forth below.
11
3
Application No. PDR 10-0005
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
A. GENERAL
1. The Planning Commission shall retain continuing jurisdiction over the Design Review and
may, at any time, modify, delete, or impose any new conditions of the permit to preserve the
public health, safety, and welfare.
2. Conditions may be modified only by the planning commission unless modification is expressly
otherwise allowed by the city code including but not limited to section 16-05.035, as applicable.
3. The Community Development Director shall mail to the Owner/Applicant a notice in writing,
on or after the time this Resolution of Approval is duly executed by the City, containing a
statement of all amounts due to the City in connection with this application, including all
consultant fees (collectively “processing fees”). This approval or permit shall expire sixty
(60) days after the date said notice is mailed if all processing fees contained in the notice
have not been paid in full. No Zoning Clearance or Demolition, Grading, or Building Permit
may be issued until the Community Development Director certifies that all processing fees have
been paid in full (and, for deposit accounts, a surplus balance of $500 is maintained).
4. A Building Permit must be issued and construction commenced within 36 months from the date
of adoption of this Resolution and the Design Review will expire unless extended in accordance
with the City Code.
5. The facility shall at all times operate in compliance with all applicable regulations of the
State, County, City and/or other governmental agencies having jurisdictional authority over
the facility pertaining to, but not limited to, health, sanitation, safety, and water quality
issues. The Project shall maintain compliance with all applicable requirements of the State,
County, City and other governmental entities having jurisdiction.
6. Prior to issuance of any demolition, grading, or building permit to implement this Design
Review approval the Applicant shall obtain a “Zoning Clearance” from the Community
Development Director by submitting final plans for the requested permit to the Community
Development Department for review to ascertain compliance with the requirements of this
Resolution.
7. Agreement to Indemnify, Hold Harmless and Defend City as to Action Challenging
Approval of Application and as to Damage from Performance of Work Authorized by
Design Review Approval. As a condition of this Approval, Owner and Applicant hereby agree
to defend, indemnify and hold the City and its officers, officials, boards, commissions,
employees, agents and volunteers harmless from and against:
12
4
Application No. PDR 10-0005
a. any and all claims, actions or proceedings to attack, set aside, void or annul any
action on the subject application, or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations
taken, done or made prior to said action; and
b. any and all claims, demands, actions, expenses or liabilities arising from or in any
manner relating to the performance of such construction, installation, alteration or
grading work by the Owner and/or Applicant, their successors, or by any person
acting on their behalf.
In addition, prior to any Zoning Clearance from the Community Development Director, Owner
and Applicant shall execute a separate agreement containing the details of this required
Agreement to Indemnify, Hold harmless and Defend, which shall be subject to prior approval
as to form and content by the Community Development Director.
B. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
8. Compliance with Plans. The facility shall be operated, located and constructed to include those
features, and only those features, as shown on the Approved Plans denominated Exhibit "A" and
Photo Simulations denominated Exhibit “B” date stamped November 1, 2010, incorporated by
this reference. All proposed changes to the Approved Plans must be submitted in writing with
plans showing the changes, including a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. Such
changes shall be subject to the requisite prior City approval.
9. Landscaping/Equipment. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with recommendations
by the City Arborist. A water meter in compliance with the San Jose Water Company shall be
installed for irrigation purposes.
10. Sidewalk Clearance. The pole shall be located to maintain a minimum four feet of sidewalk
clearance.
11. Noise. Applicant shall comply with City of Saratoga noise standards.
12. Safety Fencing During Construction. During all phases of construction, the Applicant shall
install and maintain temporary safety fencing to restrict or prevent public access to active on-site
construction activities, materials, or chemicals.
13. Governmental entities. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other
Governmental entities must be met.
14. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Verification. The owner and/or Applicant for
this Project shall contact the FCC and verify whether there are any required permits from said
Commission. If required by the FCC, prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for any proposed
equipment installations (or if none, prior to commencement of the approved use), the Owner
and/or Applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department documentation from
the FCC showing proof of compliance of the proposed use and/or development with the FCC's
requirements.
13
5
Application No. PDR 10-0005
15. Fire Agency Conditions. Applicant shall comply with all Fire Agency Conditions.
16. Building Department. Applicant shall comply with all building standards including any
improvements necessary to comply with the building code.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission this 10th day of November
2010 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
Mary-Lynne Bernald
Chair, Planning Commission
ATTEST:
___________________________________
John F. Livingstone, AICP
Secretary to the Planning Commission
ACCEPTANCE BY APPLICANT AND OWNER
This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no
force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant and Property Owner or
Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and
agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the time required in
this Resolution by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission.
__________________________________ ____________________________
Applicant Date
__________________________________ ____________________________
Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date
14
15
CITY OF SARATOGA
Community Development Department
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 95070
(408) 868-1222
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The City of Saratoga’s Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on:
Wednesday, November 10, 2010 at 7:00 p.m.
The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Theater located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. A
site visit will also be held by the Planning Commission at the subject property. Please contact the
Planning Department for the date and time of the site visit. The public hearing agenda item is
stated below. Details of this item are available at the Saratoga Community Development
Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Please consult the City website at
www.saratoga.ca.us regarding Friday office closures.
APPLICATION #: PDR10-0005
APPLICANT: T-Mobile (Sutro Consulting)
APN/ ADDRESS: 403-22-004; 14091 Quito Road
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a
wireless telecommunication antenna on a wood utility pole. The facility is considred a “micro
site” because the antennas and associated equipment are smaller in size than a standard wireless
facility. The antenna would be placed at the top of the pole and the associated equipment would
be placed on the ground. The pole will be similar in height to other poles in the vicinity.
All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a
decision of the Planning Commission, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the Public Hearing.
This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject
of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor’s office annually, in
preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out-of-date information or difficulties with the U.S.
Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all residents potentially affected by a
project. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this
notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone
in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project.
Cynthia McCormick
Assistant Planner
(408) 868-1230
16
6/29/2010City of Saratoga Page -1 of 1 Radius Notification Parcel Report
Parcel NumberParcel Address Owner Name Owner Address
39702033 18530 MARSHALL LN BURKHART HOWARD N AND MARCIA G 18530 MARSHALL LN
39702035 18610 MARSHALL LN San Jose Water Company 1265 South Bascom Avenue
39702036 18525 MARSHALL LN BELLICITTI HARRY L AND MARY C 14001 CHESTER AV
39702069 18501 MARSHALL LN STRASSER KENNETH W AND RUTH M 18501 MARSHALL LN
39702070 18505 MARSHALL LN PUBLICOVER MARK W AND VALERIE 18505 MARSHALL LN
39702074 14047 QUITO RD SPENO STEVEN G AND ROXANNE D 14047 QUITO RD
39702075 14045 QUITO RD TRAN QUAT ET AL 14045 QUITO RD
39702076 QUITO RD TRAN QUAT ET AL 14045 QUITO RD
39702077 QUITO RD TRAN QUAT ET AL 14045 QUITO RD
39702110 18520 MARSHALL LN BILLICITTI HARRY L AND BELLICI 18500 MARSHALL LN
39702111 18500 MARSHALL LN BILLICITTI HARRY L AND BELLICI 18500 MARSHALL LN
39702114 14005 QUITO RD FINI JAFAR TRUSTEE 14005 QUITO RD
39702115 14017 QUITO RD SAKAKIHARA PHILIP M AND BARBAR 14017 QUITO RD
39705091 SOBEY RD SANFILIPPO GRACE A TRUSTEE 117 EL PORTON
39705096 18450 SOBEY RD MCNEIL TIMOTHY 17361 CLEARVIEW DR
40322003
40322004
40322005 14004 QUITO RD BORELLO LEONARD F AND PAULINE 14004 QUITO RD
40322006 13986 QUITO OAKS WY VOLORE JAMES C AND MARY A 13986 QUITO OAKS WY
40322007 13984 QUITO OAKS WY MORGENTHALER LAVONNE F TRUSTEE 13984 QUITO OAKS WY
40322015
40322016
40322027
40322028
40348027 1671 HYDE DR BECK RICHARD L AND LAURI T 1671 HYDE DR
40348028 1683 HYDE DR WONG OTTOMAN T AND CECILIA H 1683 HYDE DR
40348029 1685 HYDE DR MORRISON ROBERT H AND CAROL R 1685 HYDE DR
40348033 1701 HYDE DR ELISABETH DIONNE R 1701 HYDE DR
40348036 2363 POLLARD CT VOLD DANIEL P AND SHEVER AMY R 2363 POLLARD CT
40348037 2377 POLLARD CT MAMEMO LLC 487 SCOTT ST
40348038 1698 HYDE DR HUDA MUZAHID 1698 HYDE DR
40348039 1694 HYDE DR RICHMOND HARVEY W AND JOANN 1694 HYDE DR
40348040 1686 HYDE DR SCHEMBRI LARRY AND STACEY 1686 HYDE DR
40348041 1680 HYDE DR AKYOL CIHANGIR M AND JANET E 1680 HYDE DR
40348042 1672 HYDE DR MEESTER WILLIAM H 1672 HYDE DR
40348090 S C V W D
40348096 1697 HYDE DR MCVEA SCOTT AND PATRICIA TRUST 1697 HYDE DR
40348097 1693 HYDE DR ARTHUR HURST P AND LYNNE L 1693 HYDE DR
40348098 1669 HYDE DR NORTHRUP CRAIG D AND ANN S TRU 1669 HYDE DR
40348099 1665 HYDE DR PIERT RODNEY AND CHRISTIE A TR 1655 HYDE DR
40717007 101 RIO VISTA MCGUAN LAWRENCE A AND MARGARET PO BOX 82
40717008 103 RIO VISTA LUND ANTHONY J TRUSTEE 103 RIO VISTA
40717009 105 RIO VISTA ROWLEY LAURA L TRUSTEE & ET AL 105 RIO VISTA
40717010 107 RIO VISTA CHAUHAN ABHISHEK AND SHARMA MO 107 RIO VISTA
40717011 109 RIO VISTA PRUETT MARJORIE W 109 RIO VISTA
40717022 100 RIO VISTA VANDENBERG CLARENCE W 1549 OAKMONT DR UNIT 8
40717047 101 CASA GRANDE WALES ROBERT D AND BARBARA M T 101 CASA GRANDE
40717050 S C V W D
48Affected Parcels
GEO10
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com17
Owner City, State Zip
SARATOGA, CA 95070
SARATOGA, CA 95070
SARATOGA, CA 95070
SARATOGA, CA 95070
SARATOGA, CA 95070
SARATOGA, CA 95070
SARATOGA, CA 95070
SARATOGA, CA 95070
SARATOGA, CA 95070
SARATOGA, CA 95070
SARATOGA, CA 95070
SARATOGA, CA 95070
SARATOGA, CA 95070
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
,
,
SARATOGA, CA 95070
SARATOGA, CA 95070
SARATOGA, CA 95070
,
,
,
,
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
LOS GATOS, CA 95030
LOS GATOS, CA 95030
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
LOS GATOS, CA 95030
FREMONT, CA 94539
LOS GATOS, CA 95030
LOS GATOS, CA 95030
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
LOS GATOS, CA 95030
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
REDWOOD ESTATES, CA 95044
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94595
LOS GATOS, CA 95032
LOS GATOS, CA 95030
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com18
19
20
21
22
23
24