Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-01-2017 City Council Agenda Packet -finalSaratoga City Council Agenda – Page 1 of 6 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 01, 2017 5:00 P.M. STUDY SESSION Administrative Conference Room, City Hall | 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 Study Session on Council Norms of Operation Recommended Action: Discuss and provide direction on the City Council Norms of Operation. 6:00 P.M. JOINT MEETING Administrative Conference Room, City Hall | 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 Joint Meeting with Mountain Winery Discussion Topics 7:00 P.M. REGULAR SESSION Civic Theater, Council Chambers | 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL REPORT ON POSTING OF THE AGENDA The agenda for this meeting was posted on January 26, 2017 REPORT FROM STUDY SESSION AND JOINT MEETING ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Any member of the public may address the City Council for up to three (3) minutes on matters not on the Agenda. The law generally prohibits the City Council from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Council may instruct staff accordingly. ANNOUNCEMENTS Saratoga City Council Agenda – Page 2 of 6 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS Presentation by Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) on the Next Network Project Recommended Action: Receive presentation from Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) on the Next Network Project aimed at improving transit ridership. Staff Report 1. CONSENT CALENDAR The Consent Calendar contains items of routine business. Items in this section will be acted on in one motion, unless removed by the Mayor or a Council Member. Any member of the public may speak on an item on the Consent Calendar at this time, or request that the Mayor remove an item from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Public Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. 1.1. City Council Meeting Minutes Recommended Action: Approve the City Council minutes for the Regular City Council Meeting on January 18, 2017. Staff Report Attachment A – Minutes for the Regular City Council Meeting on January 18, 2017 1.2. Review of Accounts Payable Check Registers Recommended Action: Review and accept check registers for the following accounts payable payment cycles: 1/17/2017 Period 7; and 1/24/2017 Period 7. Staff Report Check Register - 01-17-2017 Period 7 Check Register - 01-24-2017 Period 7 1.3. Treasurer’s Report for the Month Ended December 31, 2016 Recommended Action: Review and accept the amended Treasurer’s Report for the month ended December 31, 2016. Treasurer Report for December 16 - CC Meeting 02012017 1.4. Highway 9 Improvements Phase IV Project – Appropriation of Additional Funds Recommended Action: Approve a budget resolution to appropriate $49,684 in additional funds for the Highway 9 Improvements Phase IV Project and authorize City Manager to execute the same. Staff Report Attachment A - Budget Resolution 1.5. Resolution of Support for Senate Bill (SB) 65 Recommended Action: Approve the resolution of support for SB 65. Staff Report Attachment A – Resolution of Support for SB 65 Attachment B – SB 65 Text Saratoga City Council Agenda – Page 3 of 6 2. PUBLIC HEARING None 3. OLD BUSINESS None 4. NEW BUSINESS 4.1. Community Event Grant Program Application Recommended Action: Review Community Event Grant Program application for this fiscal year and provide direction. Staff Report Congregation Beth David Shushan County Fair Grant Application 4.2. Use of Public Right of Way for Surveillance Cameras Recommended Action: Accept staff report and provide direction to staff. Staff Report 4.3. Authorization for Points of Interest Markers Recommended Action: Adopt a resolution authorizing a process for establishing Points of Interest Markers on public property or within a street right of way. Staff Report Attachment 1-Resolution Exhibit A to Attachment 1 - Point of Interest Markers 4.4. Formation of Public Safety Task Force Recommended Action: Provide direction to staff. Staff Report 4.5. City Council Meeting Schedule Recommended Action: Provide direction to staff regarding the City Council’s 2017 meeting schedule. Staff Report Attachment A: 2017 Calendar 4.6. Adoption of City Council Assignments – Ministerial Association Recommended Action: Approve the resolution amending the City Council assignments. Staff Report Attachment A – Resolution Amending City Council Assignments Attachment B – City Council Assignments Saratoga City Council Agenda – Page 4 of 6 CITY COUNCIL ASSIGNMENT REPORTS Mayor Emily Lo Finance Committee Hakone Foundation Board & Executive Committee KSAR Community Access TV Board Public Art Ad Hoc Santa Clara County Library Joint Powers Authority West Valley Mayors and Managers Vice Mayor Mary-Lynne Bernald Association of Bay Area Governments Cities Association of Santa Clara County-Legislative Action Committee Cities Association of Santa Clara County-Selection Committee Hakone Foundation Board Public Art Ad Hoc Saratoga Historical Foundation West Valley Solid Waste Management Joint Powers Authority Council Member Manny Cappello Cities Association of Santa Clara County Santa Clara County Housing and Community Development (HCD) Council Committee Saratoga Area Senior Coordinating Council (SASCC) West Valley Sanitation District Council Member Howard Miller America in Bloom Committee Finance Committee Saratoga Ministerial Association Silicon Valley Clean Energy Authority Board of Directors Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Policy Advisory Committee VTA State Route 85 Corridor Policy Advisory Board Council Member Rishi Kumar Saratoga Chamber of Commerce & Destination Saratoga Saratoga Sister City Organization Santa Clara County Expressway Plan 2040 Policy Advisory Board Santa Clara Valley Water District Commission CITY COUNCIL ITEMS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Saratoga City Council Agenda – Page 5 of 6 Certificate of Posting of the Agenda, Distribution of Agenda Packet, & Compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act I, Debbie Bretschneider, Deputy City Clerk for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the City Council was posted and available for review on January 26, 2017 at the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 and on the City's website at www.saratoga.ca.us. Signed this 26th day of January 2017 at Saratoga, California. Debbie Bretschneider, Deputy City Clerk In accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, copies of the staff reports and other materials provided to the City Council by City staff in connection with this agenda are available at the office of the City Clerk at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Note that copies of materials distributed to the City Council concurrently with the posting of the agenda are also available on the City Website at www.saratoga.ca.us.Any materials distributed by staff after the posting of the agenda are made available for public review at the office of the City Clerk at the time they are distributed to the City Council. These materials are also posted on the City website. In Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at 408/868-1269. Notification 24 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. [28 CFR 5.102- 35.104 ADA title II] To view current or previous City Council Meeting videos, visit www.saratoga.ca.us/council 02/01 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting –6:00 p.m. Joint Meeting with Mountain Winery 02/03 Council Retreat – 8:30 a.m. -4:30 p.m.– Saratoga Library 02/13 5 p.m. - CIP Priorization meeting 02/15 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting – 02/27 5:30 p.m. –Study session on Commission Work plans, Joan Pisani Community center, Multi-purpose room 03/01 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting –5:30 p.m. Joint meeting with Planning Commission 03/15 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting –6:00 p.m. Joint Meeting with PG&E 04/05 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting – 6:00 p.m. Joint Meeting with Saratoga Ministerial Association 04/17 6:00 p.m. Tentative Budget Study Session 04/19 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting –6:00 p.m. Joint meeting with Supervisor Simitian 05/03 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting – 5:00 p.m. Joint Meeting with Saratoga News Editor and Reporter –6:00 p.m. Joint Meeting with KSAR 05/17 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting – 6:00 p.m. Joint Meeting with Hakone 06/07 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting – 5:30 p.m. Joint Meeting with Saratoga Neighborhood’s 06/21 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting – 6:00 p.m. Joint Meeting with County Fire and Santa Clara County FireSafe Council, CITY OF SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL JOINT MEETING CALENDAR 2017 Saratoga City Council Agenda – Page 6 of 6 07/05 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting –6:00 p.m. Joint meeting with Historical Foundation 07/19 Tentative -Meeting Cancelled 08/02 Tentative --Meeting Cancelled 08/16 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting –6:00 p.m. Joint Meeting with Chamber of Commerce and Destination Saratoga 09/06 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting – 6:00 p.m. Joint Meeting with SASCC 09/20 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting – 6:00 p.m. Joint Meeting with Youth Commission 10/04 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting – 5:30 p.m. Joint Meeting with Saratoga School Districts in Senior Center, Saunders Room 10/18 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting – 6:00 p.m. Joint Meeting with San Jose Animal Control 11/01 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting –6:00 p.m. Joint Meeting with West Valley – Mission Community College Board of Trustees 11/15 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting – 6:00 p.m. Joint Meeting with Senator Beall Jr. 12/06 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting – 6:00 p.m. Joint Meeting with Representative Low 12/20 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting – 6:00 p.m. Study session –Council Norms Unless otherwise stated, Joint Meetings and Study Sessions begin at 6:00 p.m. in the Administrative Conference Room at Saratoga City Hall at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. City of Saratoga CITY COUNCIL JOINT MEETING Meeting Discussion Topics Joint Meeting with Mountain Winery February 1, 2017 | 6:00 p.m. Saratoga City Hall | Administrative Conference Room 6:00 p.m. Welcome & Introductions 6:15 p.m. Mountain Winery Updates 6:30 p.m. Discussion of Possible Annexation 6:45 p.m. Other Remarks & Wrap-up Dinner will be provided at the Joint Meeting. The Regular Session of the City Council begins at 7:00 p.m. in the Civic Theater. Joint Meeting attendees are invited to attend the Regular Session and share an overview of the Joint Meeting. 6 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:February 01, 2017 DEPARTMENT:City Manager’s Office PREPARED BY:Debbie Bretschneider, Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT:Presentation by Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) on the Next Network Project RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive presentation from Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) on the Next Network Project aimed at improving transit ridership. BACKGROUND: Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) staff will present their Next Network project aimed at improving transit ridership. The VTA Board of Directors’ proposal is a ridership coverage that allocates 85% of resources to ridership and 15% to coverage (85/15 Plan).The current ridership coverage is 70% ridership and 30% coverage. The larger the percentage of coverage the more beneficial it is to low ridership areas like Saratoga.The proposed 85/15 Plan reduces coverage resources in the County by 50%. The result of the reductions is the loss of bus lines concentrated in the West Valley and other low ridership areas in County. The following summarizes the changes in Saratoga proposed in the 85/15 Plan versus the existing plan coverage allocation of 70/30: Bus Route 26: existing route connects Eastridge Transit Center in SJ with Lockheed Martin Transit Center and Light Rail in Mountain View via Saratoga (along section of Prospect Road to Miller). This route will be split into 2 routes. New Route 26 will connect West Valley College with Light Rail and Eastridge Transit Center. Frequency will increase to 15 minutes weekdays and 20 minutes weekends. New Route 56 will not come to Saratoga. Bus Route 37: existing service from West Valley College along Allendale Avenue, Quito, Pollard to Winchester Transit Center and Capitol Light Rail Station –proposed to discontinue due to low ridership; current riders may use new Route 26 Bus Route 53: existing service from WVC along Fruitvale, Saratoga Ave, Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road to Caltrain at Sunnyvale Transit Center –proposed to change routing to exclude Saratoga Bus Route 57: existing service to Light Rail Station in Santa Clara –proposed to increase frequency to 15 minutes weekdays and 20 minutes weekends. No routing change proposed. Bus Route 58:existing service from WVC along Fruitvale Avenue to Light Rail and Alviso –proposed to discontinue.7 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:February 1, 2017 DEPARTMENT:City Manager’s Office PREPARED BY:Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk/Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT:City Council Meeting Minutes RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the City Council minutes for the Regular City Council Meeting on January 18, 2017. BACKGROUND: Draft City Council minutes for each Council Meeting are taken to the City Council to be reviewed for accuracy and approval. Following City Council approval, minutes are retained for legislative history and posted on the City of Saratoga website. The draft minutes are attached to this report for Council review and approval. FOLLOW UP ACTION: Minutes will be retained for legislative history and posted on the City of Saratoga website. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A –Minutes for the Regular City Council Meeting on January 18, 2017 8 MINUTES WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18, 2017 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING At 5:00 p.m., the Saratoga City Council did not have a quorum for the Study Session in the Administrative Conference Room at Saratoga City Hall at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. The meeting was rescheduled for February 1, 2017. At 7:00 p.m., Mayor Emily Lo called the Regular Session to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL PRESENT:Mayor Emily Lo, Council Members Manny Cappello, Howard Miller, Rishi Kumar ABSENT:Vice Mayor Mary-Lynne Bernald (Excused) ALSO PRESENT:James Lindsay, City Manager Richard Taylor, City Attorney Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk/Asst. to City Manager John Cherbone, Public Works Director Mary Furey, Finance & Administrative Services Director Erwin Ordoñez, Community Development Director Michael Taylor, Recreation & Facilities Director Sandy Bailey, Project Manager REPORT ON POSTING OF THE AGENDA City Clerk Crystal Bothelio reported that the agenda was property posted on January 12, 2017. Mayor Lo asked for a motion to move Council Announcements to the end of the meeting. CAPPELLO/MILLER MOVED TO MOVE THE COUNCIL ANNOUNCMENTS TO THE END OF THE COUNCIL MEETING, WITH ONE EXCEPTION. MOTION PASSED. AYES, LO, CAPPELLO, MILLER, KUMAR. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: BERNALD. REPORT FROM STUDY SESSION MEETING Mayor Lo reported that this meeting is moved to February 1, 2017 in the Administrative Conference Room at Saratoga City Hall at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Jim Stallman spoke on the potential changes in the VTA bus routes and encouraged the City Council to retain service in Saratoga. 9 CITY COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS Council Member Miller announced that the Valley Transportation Agency (VTA) is going through a review of all bus stops to improve ridership and farebox recovery. A VTA spokesperson is attending a meeting on January 25 at the Saratoga Senior Center at 1:15 p.m. and feedback on the plan is encouraged. There are other meetings in nearby cities for the next 4 weeks. CEREMONIAL ITEMS Proclamation Declaring January 2017 as National Human Trafficking Awareness Month Recommended Action: Present proclamations to Saratoga Federated Church Anti-Human Trafficking Task Force and to Saint Andrew’s Episcopal Church Anti-Human Trafficking Task Force. Mayor Lo and members of the City Council presented the proclamation to the Saratoga Federated Church Anti-Human Trafficking Task Force and to Saint Andrew’s Episcopal Church Anti-Human Trafficking Task Force. Proclamation Declaring January 13, 2017 as Lung Cancer Awareness Day Recommended Action: Present the proclamation to representatives of the Bonnie J. Addario Lung Cancer Foundation. Mayor Lo and members of the City Council presented the proclamation to representatives of the Bonnie J. Addario Lung Cancer Foundation and family and friends of former Council Member Susie Nagpal. 1.CONSENT CALENDAR 1.1. City Council Meeting Minutes Recommended Action: Approve the City Council minutes for the Special City Council Meeting on December 15, 2016 and Regular City Council Meeting on December 21, 2016. MILLER/CAPPELLO MOVED TO APPROVE THE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FOR THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON DECEMBER 15, 2016 AND REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON DECEMBER 21, 2016.MOTION PASSED. AYES, LO, CAPPELLO, MILLER, KUMAR. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: BERNALD. 1.2. Review of Accounts Payable Check Registers Recommended Action: Review and accept check registers for the following accounts payable payment cycles: 12/20/2016 Period 6; and 01/10/2017 Period 7. 10 MILLER/CAPPELLO MOVED TO REVIEW AND ACCEPT CHECK REGISTERS FOR THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAYMENT CYCLES: 12/20/2016 PERIOD 6; AND 01/10/2017 PERIOD 7. MOTION PASSED. AYES, LO, CAPPELLO, MILLER, KUMAR. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: BERNALD. 1.3. Treasurer’s Report for the Month Ended November 30, 2016 Recommended Action: Review and accept the amended Treasurer’s Report for the month ended November 30, 2016. MILLER/CAPPELLO MOVED TO ACCEPT THE AMENDED TREASURER’S REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2016. MOTION PASSED. AYES, LO, CAPPELLO, MILLER, KUMAR. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: BERNALD. 1.4. Resolution Authorizing Final Disposition of Certain City Records Recommended Action: Adopt resolution authorizing final disposition of certain city records. RESOLUTION 17-001 MILLER/CAPPELLO MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL DISPOSITION OF CERTAIN CITY RECORDS. MOTION PASSED. AYES, LO, CAPPELLO, MILLER, KUMAR. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: BERNALD. 1.5. Notice of Completion--2016 Pavement Management Program. Recommended Action: Move to accept the 2016 Pavement Management Program contract as complete and authorize staff to record the Notice of Completion. MILLER/CAPPELLO MOVED TO ACCEPT THE 2016 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CONTRACT AS COMPLETE AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO RECORD THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION. MOTION PASSED. AYES, LO, CAPPELLO, MILLER, KUMAR. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: BERNALD. 1.6. Second Reading of City Code Amendments to conform Second (Accessory) Dwelling Unit regulations with recently enacted State Laws Recommended Action: Waive the second reading and adopt the attached ordinance revising the City Code Article 15-56 (Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance). ORDINANCE 348 11 MILLER/CAPPELLO MOVED TO WAIVE THE SECOND READING AND ADOPT THE ATTACHED ORDINANCE REVISING THE CITY CODE ARTICLE 15-56 (SECOND DWELLING UNIT ORDINANCE). MOTION PASSED. AYES, LO, CAPPELLO, MILLER, KUMAR. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: BERNALD. 1.7. Council Resolution to approve side letters of agreement for the UNION, SEA, and amend the Employment Policy for Unrepresented Employees. Recommended Action: Adopt resolution to: 1. Amend the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the UNION by adopting the Side Letter Agreement; 2. Amend the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the SEA by adopting the Side Letter Agreement; and 3. Amend the Employment Policy for Unrepresented Employees. RESOLUTION 17-002 MILLER/CAPPELLO MOVED TO ADPORT THE RESOLUTION TO (1) AMEND THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE UNION BY ADOPTING THE SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT; (2) AMEND THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE SEA BY ADOPTING THE SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT; AND (3) AMEND THE EMPLOYMENT POLICY FOR UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES. MOTION PASSED. AYES, LO, CAPPELLO, MILLER, KUMAR. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: BERNALD. 1.8. Third Amendment to the Hakone Gardens Master Plan Development Agreement Recommended Action: Approve the Third Amendment to the Development Agreement amending funding for Master Plan improvements. MILLER/CAPPELLO MOVED TO APPROVE THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDING FUNDING FOR MASTER PLAN IMPROVEMENTS. MOTION PASSED. AYES, LO, CAPPELLO, MILLER, KUMAR. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: BERNALD. 1.9. Response to Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury Follow-Up Request Recommended Action: Review the request and authorize the Mayor to sign the proposed response. MILLER/CAPPELLO MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE PROPOSED RESPONSE TO THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY. MOTION PASSED. AYES, LO, CAPPELLO, MILLER, KUMAR. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: BERNALD. 12 2.PUBLIC HEARING 2.1. APPC16-0003 - Appeal of Design Review application for a new two-story residence at Paramount Ct – Lot 7 Recommended Action: Conduct a public hearing and adopt a resolution denying the appeal. Council Member Miller announced that he would need to recuse himself from this item and item 2.2, he then left the Council Chambers before the start of the item. Erwin Ordoñez, Community Development Director, announced that the Council has a desk item that outlines a compromise that appellant and applicant had worked out. Mayor Lo opened the public hearing. Raghav Sharma, the appellant, provided opening remarks. Mark Garcia, the applicant, provided opening remarks. Mayor Lo invited public comment. The following people requested to speak: Dede Smullen, Planning Commission Chair Joyce Hlava, Planning Commissioner Sandy Miller Catherine Morocco Mark Garcia, the applicant, provided closing remarks. Raghav Sharma, the appellant, provided closing remarks. Mayor Lo closed the public hearing. RESOLUTION 17-003 CAPPELLO/KUMAR MOVE TO ADOPT THE AMENDED RESOLUTION APPROVING RESIDENCE AT PARAMOUNT COURT –LOT 7 WITH REVISED CONDITION OF APPROVAL, WITH THESE CONDITIONS: (1) THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OF THE REVISED PLANS SHALL BE THE SAME AS THE ORIGINAL PLANS; (2) THE EXTERIOR MATERIALS OF THE REVISED PLANS SHALL BE SIMILAR TO THE MATERIALS ORIGINALLY PROPOSED; AND (3)THE EXTERIOR COLORS SHALL BE SIMILAR TO THE COLORS 13 ORIGINALLY PROPOSED.MOTION PASSED. AYES, LO, CAPPELLO, KUMAR. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: MILLER. ABSENT: BERNALD. 2.2. Notice of Continuation of Appeal Hearings for Paramount Court Lots 1, 2, 3, and 5 Recommended Action: Informational only. No action needed. Before the start of item 2.1, Council Member Miller recused himself from item 2.1 and 2.2 and left the Council Chambers. Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk/Asst. to the City Manager, presented the staff report on this item. Council Member Miller announced that he would need to recuse himself from this item. Mayor Lo invited public comment. No one requested to speak. After the conclusion of item 2.2, Council Member Miller returned to the Council Chambers. 2.3. Hazardous Vegetation Program Resolution Declaring Abatement of Public Nuisance Recommended Action: Conduct public hearing and adopt resolution. Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk/Asst. to the City Manager, presented the staff report on this item. Moe Kumre, Santa Clara County Weed Abatement Program Manager, addressed questions from the City Council. Mayor Lo invited public comment. The following people requested to speak. Charley Oveland Tadashi Okuno Martin Rossip Nigel Ball John Keenan Christina Garrod Cagliostro 14 Justin James Johnston Anita Spiro Kenley Wong Jeffrey Patterson John Cagliostro Ellen Urrutia Dory Albert Vito Minetti Haidah Karkhanech Fari Moazeni Mahbouba Moazeni Yu Fen Hion Ng Soo Eng Robert Yager Rafik Buva Danny Hui Sherman Fan Robert Hsiau Kikyun Jeo Devendra Singh Mayor Lo closed the public hearing. 15 MILLER/CAPPELLO MOVED TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO MARCH 15, 2017 AND DIRECTED STAFF TO: HELP CONNECT WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM STAFF WITH PROPERTY OWNERS WHO FEEL THEY SHOULD NOT BE ON THE LIST; SEND A LETTER TO PROPERTY OWNERS ON THE LIST WITH INFORMATION ABOUT HOW TO REQUEST BEING REMOVED FROM THE WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM LIST; WORK WITH WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM AND COUNTY FIRE STAFF TO CREATE COMMON MESSAGING AND OUTREACH MATERIAL; SEND NOTICES TO EVERYONE ON THE WEED AND BRUSH ABATEMENT LISTS PRIOR TO HEARINGS HELD BY THE CITY; AND TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNICATION PLAN FOR THE WEED AND BRUSH ABATEMENT PROGRAMS EXPLAINING REQUIREMENTS AND THE PROGRAM PROCESSES THAT INCLUDES DETAILS ABOUT HOW TO REQUEST REMOVAL FROM THE PROGRAMS. MOTION PASSED. AYES, LO, CAPPELLO, KUMAR. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: MILLER. ABSENT: BERNALD. The City Council took a 5 minute recess at 10:27 p.m. 3.OLD BUSINESS None 4.NEW BUSINESS 4.1. 2017 America in Bloom Program Recommended Action: Approve funding for the 2017 America in Bloom Program and authorize an allocation of $17,000 from the City Council Discretionary Fund in the Fiscal Year 2016/17 Budget. John Cherbone, Public Works Director, presented the staff report. Mayor Lo invited public comment. Jill Hunter MILLER/CAPPELLO MOVED TO APPROVE FUNDING FOR THE 2017 AMERICA IN BLOOM PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZE AN ALLOCATION OF $17,000 FROM THE CITY COUNCIL DISCRETIONARY FUND IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 BUDGET. MOTION PASSED. AYES, LO, CAPPELLO, MILLER, KUMAR. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: BERNALD. 4.2. Adoption of City Council Assignments – Finance Committee Recommended Action: Approve the resolution amending the City Council assignments. 16 Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk/Asst. to the City Manager, presented the staff report on this item. Mayor Lo invited public comment. No one requested to speak. RESOLUTION NO. 17-004 CAPPELLO/KUMAR MOVED TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION AMENDING CITY COUNCIL ASSIGNMENTS WITH COUNCIL MEMBER MILLER AS PRIMARY MEMBER OF FINANCE COMMITTEE AND MAYOR LO AS SECONDARY MEMBER. MOTION PASSED. AYES, LO, CAPPELLO, MILLER, KUMAR. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: BERNALD. CITY COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS After concluding Item 4.2, the City Council returned to City Council Announcements. Council Member Kumar announced that the Saratoga Village Development Council (SVDC) is once again having school children create Love Notes, which are displayed in Village business windows. Free weekly Sunday classes are back in the Joan Pisani Community Center, including Coders Club, Yoga, and Bollywood Fitness. Mayor Lo spoke on the Neighborhood Watch grants that are available with more information available on City’s website. CITY COUNCIL ASSIGNMENT REPORTS Mayor Emily Lo Hakone Foundation Board & Executive Committee –Hakone Chinese New Year Celebration is on February 19. At an upcoming meeting, the Board will discuss revisions to the bylaws. KSAR Community Access TV Board – the Board is in process of making improvements to their website and purchased equipment for studio audio upgrades. Vice Mayor Mary-Lynne Bernald No report Council Member Manny Cappello Cities Association of Santa Clara County –at the meeting last week, the CPUC letter was approved unanimously. Cities Association of Santa Clara County-Selection Committee – Council Member Cappello attended on behalf of Vice Mayor Bernald. There were 11 appointments to various regional boards. Vice Mayor Bernald was appointed as the West Valley cities representative to the Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission. 17 Saratoga Area Senior Coordinating Council (SASCC) –the Age Friendly committee on January 17. Some Parks & Recreation Commissioners attended and put forward the idea of videotaping parks so that people unable to access the parks could still enjoy them. Council Member Howard Miller America in Bloom Committee –the Committee met yesterday to discuss the America in Bloom item on tonight’s meeting. Also have a meeting tomorrow. Saratoga Ministerial Association –Council Member Miller has a conflict with the next scheduled meeting, as does Mayor Lo – the alternate. Council Member Cappello will attend. Silicon Valley Clean Energy Authority Board of Directors –postcards to residents will be going out next week around January 23. Customers will receive 4 notices in total. If residents do nothing, they become part of SiliconValley Clean Energy, which should be providing cheaper energy than PG&E. VTA State Route 85 Corridor Policy Advisory Board – Council Member Miller announced he was appointed as Chair with John McAllister as Vice Chair. VTA recently changed its logo. Council Member Rishi Kumar Saratoga Chamber of Commerce & Destination Saratoga –there is a meeting next week to discuss collaborative projects. Santa Clara Valley Water District Commission –the Commission and Board both meet next week. With the City Manager’s help, Council Member Kumar is creating a letter to send to both bodies to recommend removal of 20% drought conservation requirement. CITY COUNCIL ITEMS None CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None ADJOURNMENT MILLER/CAPPELLO MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 11:28 P.M. MOTION PASSED. AYES: LO, CAPPELLO, MILLER, KUMAR. NOES: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. ABSENT: BERNALD. Minutes respectfully submitted: Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk City of Saratoga 18 Gina Scott, Accounting Technician SUBJECT: Review of Accounts Payable Check Registers RECOMMENDED ACTION: Review and accept check registers for the following accounts payable payment cycles: 1/17/2017 Period 7 1/24/2017 Period 7 BACKGROUND: The information listed below provides detail for weekly City check runs. Checks issued for $20,000 or greater are listed separately as well as any checks that were void during the time period. Fund information, by check run, is also provided in this report. REPORT SUMMARY: Attached are Check Registers for: Date Ending Check # 1/17/17 132441 132487 47 157,370.13 01/17/17 01/10/17 132440 1/24/17 132488 132542 55 658,009.94 01/24/17 01/17/17 132487 Accounts Payable checks issued for $20,000 or greater: Date Check # Issued to Dept.Amount 01/17/17 132478 PW 38,500.00 01/24/17 132497 Rsk Mgmnt 37,060.95 01/24/17 132517 PS 431,347.75 01/24/17 132519 CDD 33,150.00 01/24/17 132529 Legal 39,119.29 Accounts Payable checks voided during this time period: AP Date Check #Amount 01/17/17 132454 Void check 34.46 01/17/17 132472 Void check 19.35 09/13/16 131673 Re-issue 810.00 ATTACHMENTS: Check Registers in the 'A/P Checks By Period and Year' report format General General Bond Release SCC Office of the Sheriff Fund Purpose Legal Services General General Law Enforcement Workers CompWorker's Comp Bond Release Our Lady of Fatima Villa Shute Mihaly & Weinberger Timespace Square, LLC Comp Risk Pool/ABAG SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:February 1, 2017 DEPARTMENT:Finance & Administrative Services PREPARED BY: Ending Check #Type of Checks Date Starting Check # Accounts Payable Accounts Payable Issued to Shawn Gardner Javier Alcazar Reason Status Mileage not reimburseable Never received checkPacific Display, Inc. Mileage not reimburseable Prior Check Register Checks Released Total Checks Amount 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 1, 2017 DEPARTMENT: Finance & Administrative Services PREPARED BY: Ann Xu, Accountant SUBJECT: Treasurer’s Report for the Month Ended December 31, 2016 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Review and accept the amended Treasurer’s Report for the month ended December 31, 2016. BACKGROUND: California government code section 41004 requires that the City Treasurer submit to the City Clerk and the legislative body a written report and accounting of all receipts, disbursements, and fund balances. The Municipal Code of the City of Saratoga, Article 2-20, Section 2-20.035 designates the City Manager as the City Treasurer. This report is prepared to fulfill this requirement. The following attachments provide various financial transaction data for the City of Saratoga’s Funds collectively as well as specifically for the City’s General (Operating) Fund, including an attachment from the State Treasurer’s Office of Quarterly LAIF rates from the 1st Quarter of 1977 to present. FISCAL STATEMENT: Cash and Investments Balance by Fund As of December 31, 2016, the City had $540,876 in cash deposit at Comerica bank, and $18,142,607 on deposit with LAIF. The City Council’s adopted policy on the Working Capital Reserve Fund states that effective July 1, 2016: for cash flow purposes and to avoid occurrence of dry period financing, pooled cash from all funds should not be allowed to fall below $1,000,000. The total pooled cash balance as of December 31, 2016 is $18,683,483 and exceeds the minimum limit required. City’s Current Financial Position In accordance with California government code section 53646 (b) (3), the City is financially well positioned and able to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months. As of December 31, 2016, the City’s financial position (Assets $19.5M, Liabilities $2.6M and Fund Equity $16.9M) remains very strong and there are no issues in meeting financial obligations now or in the foreseeable future. Unrestricted Cash Comerica Bank 540,876$ Deposit with LAIF 18,142,607$ Total Unrestricted Cash 18,683,483$ Cash Summary 31 The following Fund Balance schedule represents actual funding available for all funds at the end of the monthly period. This amount differs from the above Cash Summary schedule as assets and liabilities are components of the fund balance. As illustrated in the summary below, Total Unrestricted Cash is adjusted by the addition of Total Assets less the amount of Total Liabilities to arrive at the Ending Fund Balance – which represents the actual amount of funds available. Fund Balance Designations In accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions, the components of fund balance are categorized as follows: “non-spendable fund balance”, resources that are inherently non-spendable from the vantage point of the current period; “restricted fund balance”, resources that are subject to enforceable legal restrictions; “committed fund balance”, resources whose use is constrained by limitations the government imposes upon itself through formal action at its highest level of decision making and remains binding unless removed in the same manner; “assigned fund balance”, resources that reflects a government’s intended use of resources, such intent would have to be established at either the highest level of decision making, by a body, or an official designated for that purpose; and “unassigned fund balance”, net resources in excess of what can properly be classified in one of the other four categories. Currently, the City’s fund balance reserves fall into one of the four spendable categories; restricted, committed, assigned, or unassigned fund balance. ATTACHMENTS A – Change in Total Fund Balances by Fund under GASB 54 B – Change in Total Fund Balances by CIP Project C – Change in Cash Balance by Month D – Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Quarterly Apportionment Rates + Total Unrestricted Cash 18,683,483$ Plus: Assets 851,745 Less: Liabilities (2,560,957) Ending Fund Balance 16,974,271$ Adjusting Cash to Ending Fund Balance 32 ATTACHMENT A CHANGES IN TOTAL FUND BALANCE UNDER GASB 54 Fund Description Fund Balance 7/1/16 Increase/ (Decrease) Jul-Nov Current Revenue Current Expenditure Transfer In Transfer Out Fund Balance 12/31/16 General Fund Restricted Fund Balances: Environmental Services Reserve 313,182 - - - - - 313,182 Committed Fund Balances: Hillside Stability Reserve 1,000,000 - - - - 210,000 790,000 Assigned Fund Balances: Future Capital Replacement & Efficiency Project Reserve 1,472,408 - - - - 1,410,648 61,760 Facility Reserve 1,200,000 - - - - - 1,200,000 Carryforwards Reserve - - - - - - - Unassigned Fund Balances:- Working Capital Reserve 1,000,000 - - - - - 1,000,000 Fiscal Stabilization Reserve 2,250,000 - - - - - 2,250,000 Development Services Reserve 719,562 - - - - - 719,562 Compensated Absences Reserve 209,937 - - - - - 209,937 Other Unassigned Fund Balance Reserve (Pre YE distribution 2,475,531 (3,458,650) 3,068,322 1,216,496 - - 868,707 General Fund Total 10,640,620 (3,458,650) 3,068,322 1,216,496 - 1,620,648 7,413,148 Special Revenue Landscape/Lighting Districts 1,005,796 (137,419) 61,742 27,021 - - 903,098 Capital Project Street Projects 1,559,080 (432,232) 29,275 197,566 1,305,000 - 2,263,557 Park and Trail Projects 471,639 (13,925) - 10,263 98,000 23,000 522,450 Facility Projects 245,639 (2,285) 5,000 - 190,648 - 439,002 Administrative Projects 667,699 (10,408) 3,059 2,741 167,394 117,394 707,609 Tree Fund Projects 94,100 (2,283) 300 5,982 - - 86,135 Park In-Lieu Fees Projects 495,465 (4,404) - - - - 491,061 CIP Grant Street Projects 25,310 (8,069) - - - - 17,241 CIP Grant Park & Trail Projects 21,206 - - 2,410 - - 18,796 CIP Grant Administrative Projects - (14,934) - 1,903 - - (16,837) Gas Tax Fund Projects 1,135,927 (393,392) 50,270 39,423 - - 753,383 CIP Fund Total 4,716,065 (881,932) 87,904 260,288 1,761,042 140,394 5,282,397 Debt Service Library Bond 922,952 (656,259) 2,683 - - - 269,376 Internal Service Fund Liability/Risk Management 376,488 (16,156) - 6,629 - - 353,703 Workers Compensation 304,401 (2,852) - 2,117 - - 299,432 Office Support Fund 96,172 6,000 495 674 - - 101,994 Information Technology Services 274,223 55,948 499 27,256 - - 303,414 Equipment Maintenance 165,949 38,848 - 10,922 - - 193,875 Building Maintenance 370,717 100,389 615 47,427 - - 424,294 Equipment Replacement 611,708 58,708 - (2,804) - - 673,220 Technology Replacement 274,339 52,911 - - - - 327,250 Building FFE Replacement 339,222 89,855 - - - - 429,077 Total City 20,098,652 (4,750,608) 3,222,258 1,596,025 1,761,042 1,761,042 16,974,271 33 ATTACHMENT B FUND BALANCES BY CIP PROJECT CIP Funds/Projects Fund Balance 7/1/16 Increase/ (Decrease) Jul-Nov Current Revenue Current Expenditure Transfer In Transfer Out Fund Balance 12/31/16 Street Projects Annual Road Improvements 630,647 (301,753) 29,275 157,607 550,000 - 750,562 Roadway Safety & Traffic Calming 51,574 (34,950) - 609 50,000 - 66,015 Highway 9 Safety Project - Phase IV 120,149 (7,052) - - - - 113,097 Beaumont Traffic Circle 30,000 - - - - - 30,000 Village LED Streetlights 4,835 - - - - - 4,835 Annual Infrastructure Maintenance& Repair 88,517 (69,150) - 39,350 200,000 - 180,017 Village Pedestrian Improvements - Phase II 18,424 - - - 105,000 - 123,424 EL Camino Grande SD Pump 142,988 - - - - - 142,988 Storm Drain Capture Device 30,000 - - - - - 30,000 Wildcat Creek Outfall 40,000 - - - - - 40,000 Fourth Street Bridge Widening 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Quito Road Bridge Replacement 157,830 - - - - - 157,830 Quito Road Bridge - ROW ACQ 45,373 (419) - - - - 44,953 Damon Lane Retaining Wall - - - - 190,000 - 190,000 Bainter Ave Retaining Wall - (18,908) - - 210,000 - 191,092 Underground Project 98,744 - - - - - 98,744 Total Street Projects 1,559,080 (432,232) 29,275 197,566 1,305,000 - 2,263,557 Parks & Trails Projects Park/Trail Repairs 618 - - - - - 618 Sustainable Landscaping 72,160 (6,004) - 3,603 - - 62,554 Magical Bridge Playground - - - - 32,000 - 32,000 Hakone Gardens Miscellaneous Improvements 96,548 (7,922) - - - 23,000 65,626 Hakone Gardens Infrastructure Improvements 122,435 - - - - - 122,435 Hakone Gardens Koi Pond Improvements - - - - 66,000 - 66,000 Saratoga to Sea Trail - Construction 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Joe's Trail at Saratoga/De Anza 33,997 - - - - - 33,997 Guava/Fredericksburg Entrance 45,880 - - 6,661 - - 39,219 Total Parks & Trails Projects 471,639 (13,925) - 10,263 98,000 23,000 522,450 Facility Projects Security Locks 23,375 - - - - - 23,375 CIP Facility Building Improvement - (1,130) - - 70,648 - 69,518 ENG/CDD Window Replacement 2,238 (228) - - - - 2,010 Civic Theater Improvements 90,660 3,974 - - - - 94,634 CC/SC Panel Upgrade - - - - 120,000 - 120,000 SPCC Furniture & Fixtures 13,896 - - - - - 13,896 Library Building Exterior Maintenance Projects 15,470 (4,900) 5,000 - - - 15,570 Library - EV FC Station 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Total Facility Projects 245,639 (2,285) 5,000 - 190,648 - 439,002 Administrative and Technology Projects COMB Document Imaging Project 43,973 (10,097) - - - - 33,876 City Website/Intranet 69,409 - - - 15,000 - 84,409 Development Technology 44,113 14,099 3,009 - - - 61,221 Trak-It Software Upgrade 42,733 (8,650) - - - - 34,083 LLD Initiation Match Program 24,000 - - - - - 24,000 Horseshoe Beautification 25,000 - - - - - 25,000 Citywide Transportation Needs Assessment - (3,600) 50 1,950 50,000 - 44,500 General Plan Update 200,000 - - - - 52,394 147,606 Village Façade Program 15,751 - - - - - 15,751 Village Specific Plan Update 47,606 (2,160) - 791 52,394 - 97,049 Wildfire Protection Plan 25,000 - - - - 25,000 - Risk Management Project Funding 90,115 - - - 50,000 - 140,115 CIP ADMIN - UNALLOCATED 40,000 - - - - 40,000 - Total Administrative and Technology Projects 667,699 (10,408) 3,059 2,741 167,394 117,394 707,609 34 ATTACHMENT B (Cont.) FUND BALANCES BY CIP PROJECT CIP Funds/Projects Fund Balance 7/1/16 Increase/ (Decrease) Jul-Nov Current Revenue Current Expenditure Transfer In Transfer Out Fund Balance 12/31/16 Tree Fund Projects Citywide Tree Planting Program 70,850 (2,408) 300 5,982 - - 62,760 Tree Dedication Program 21,500 125 - - - - 21,625 SMSCF Tree Donation Program 1,750 - - - - - 1,750 Total Tree Fund Projects 94,100 (2,283) 300 5,982 - - 86,135 CIP Grant Street Projects Highway 9 - Phase IV - (4,833) - - - - (4,833) Prospect/Saratoga Median Improvement (40) - - - - - (40) Citywide Signal Upgrade II (965) - - - - - (965) Saratoga Ave Sidewalk 26,316 - - - - - 26,316 Quito Road Bridge - ROW ACQ - (3,237) - - - - (3,237) Total CIP Grant Street Projects 25,310 (8,069) - - - - 17,241 CIP Grant Park & Trail Projects AB8939 Beverage Container Grant Funding 8,397 - - 2,410 - - 5,987 Joe's Trail at Saratoga/De Anza 12,809 - - - - - 12,809 Total CIP Grant Park & Trail Projects 21,206 - - 2,410 - - 18,796 CIP Grant Facility Projects - - - - - - SC - Restroom ADA Upgrade - (14,934) - 1,903 - - (16,837) Total CIP Grant Facility Projects - (14,934) - 1,903 - - (16,837) Park In-Lieu Fees Projects Magical Bridge Playground - - - - 128,000 - 128,000 Quarry Park ADA Access - (5,304) - - 250,000 - 244,696 Unallocated Park Fees 495,465 900 - - (378,000) - 118,365 Total park In-Lieu Fees Projects 495,465 (4,404) - - - - 491,061 Gas Tax Fund Projects Annual Roadway Improvements 572,850 (325,313) 50,270 4,066 - - 293,740 Prospect/Saratoga Median Improvements 395,244 (68,079) - 35,356 - - 291,809 Citywide Signal Upgrade II 99,759 - - - - - 99,759 Quito Road & Paseo Olivos Storm Drain 40,000 - - - - - 40,000 Big Basin Way Sidewalk Repairs 20,990 - - - - - 20,990 Quito Road Bridges 7,085 - - - - - 7,085 Total Gas Tax Fund Projects 1,135,927 (393,392) 50,270 39,423 - - 753,383 Total CIP Funds 4,716,065 (881,932) 87,904 260,288 1,761,042 140,394 5,282,397 35 ATTACHMENT C CHANGE IN CASH BALANCE BY MONTH 36 ATTACHMENT D March June September December 1977 5.68 5.78 5.84 6.45 1978 6.97 7.35 7.86 8.32 1979 8.81 9.10 9.26 10.06 1980 11.11 11.54 10.01 10.47 1981 11.23 11.68 12.40 11.91 1982 11.82 11.99 11.74 10.71 1983 9.87 9.64 10.04 10.18 1984 10.32 10.88 11.53 11.41 1985 10.32 9.98 9.54 9.43 1986 9.09 8.39 7.81 7.48 1987 7.24 7.21 7.54 7.97 1988 8.01 7.87 8.20 8.45 1989 8.76 9.13 8.87 8.68 1990 8.52 8.50 8.39 8.27 1991 7.97 7.38 7.00 6.52 1992 5.87 5.45 4.97 4.67 1993 4.64 4.51 4.44 4.36 1994 4.25 4.45 4.96 5.37 1995 5.76 5.98 5.89 5.76 1996 5.62 5.52 5.57 5.58 1997 5.56 5.63 5.68 5.71 1998 5.70 5.66 5.64 5.46 1999 5.19 5.08 5.21 5.49 2000 5.80 6.18 6.47 6.52 2001 6.16 5.32 4.47 3.52 2002 2.96 2.75 2.63 2.31 2003 1.98 1.77 1.63 1.56 2004 1.47 1.44 1.67 2.00 2005 2.38 2.85 3.18 3.63 2006 4.03 4.53 4.93 5.11 2007 5.17 5.23 5.24 4.96 2008 4.18 3.11 2.77 2.54 2009 1.91 1.51 0.90 0.60 2010 0.56 0.56 0.51 0.46 2011 0.51 0.48 0.38 0.38 2012 0.38 0.36 0.35 0.32 2013 0.28 0.24 0.26 0.26 2014 0.24 0.22 0.24 0.25 2015 0.26 0.28 0.32 0.37 2016 0.46 0.55 0.60 0.68 Quarterly Apportionment Rates Local Agency Investment Fund 37 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:February 1st, 2017 DEPARTMENT:Public Works Department PREPARED BY:Iveta Harvancik, Senior Engineer SUBJECT:Highway 9 Improvements Phase IV Project –Appropriation of Additional Funds RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve a budget resolution to appropriate $49,684 in additional funds for the Highway 9 Improvements Phase IV Project. BACKGROUND: The City has a cooperative agreement with Monte Sereno for the Highway 9 Improvements Phase IV Project.Per this cooperative agreement, Monte Sereno will pay its share of the local match of the Construction Project and Construction Management costs. In December 2016 City Council awarded Contracts for Construction and Construction Management for the Highway 9 Improvements Phase IV Project. A budget resolution is needed to appropriate the expected funds from Monte Sereno for its share of the local match costs. It is therefore recommended that City Council approve the attached Budget Resolution to appropriate the additional funds from Monte Sereno for the Highway 9 Improvements Phase IV Project. FISCAL STATEMENT: The Budget for the project will be adjusted to reflect the additional revenue and expenditure of $49,684 of local match funds from Monte Sereno. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A –Budget Resolution 38 RESOLUTION NO.__________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA TO APPROPRIATE ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR THE HIGHWAY 9 IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT PHASE IV WHEREAS, the City Council desires continuation of the safety improvements on Highway 9 by the initiation and completion of Phase IV of the Project; WHEREAS, additional Local Match funds are necessary for the construction contract and related costs for the Project; WHEREAS, such funds are available from the local match share for construction costs from Monte Sereno; WHEREAS, it is necessary to appropriate the additional funds to the Highway 9 Improvements Project Phase IV by adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2016/2017 budget as follows: Account Description Account Amount To appropriate Revenue and Expense for Highway 9 Improvements Project Phase IV: Increase Revenuefor Hwy 9 Improvements Project Phase IV 411.9122-005.49999 $ 49,684 Increase Expenditure Hwy 9 Improvement Project Phase IV 411.9122-005.81142 $ 49,684 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Saratoga hereby approves the above adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2016/17 CIP Budget. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the above and foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Saratoga City Council held on 1st day of February, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _____________________ Emily Lo City of Saratoga Attest: _______________________ Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk 39 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:February 1, 2017 DEPARTMENT:City Manager’s Office PREPARED BY:Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk/Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT:Resolution of Support for Senate Bill 65 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the resolution of support for SB 65. BACKGROUND: Mayor Lo has approved the placement of this item on the Council agenda at the request of Assemblymember Low’s Office. Coauthored by Assemblymember Even Low and State Senator Jerry Hill, SB 65 would make changes to laws related to operating a vehicle under the influence. Currently, existing law identifies operating a motor vehicle while drinking alcohol as an infraction. If adopted, SB 65 would make operating a vehicle, boat, or aircraft while drinking alcohol either an infraction or misdemeanor. Additionally, the bill would make operating any type of vehicle while smoking or ingesting marijuana products punishable as an infraction or misdemeanor. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A –Resolution of Support for SB 65 Attachment B –SB 65 Text 40 RESOLUTION NO. 17-____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA IN SUPPORT OF SENATE BILL 65 WHEREAS, current California law makes driving a vehicle punishable as an infraction; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill (SB) 65 would expand current law to make operating a boat, vessel, aircraft or motor vehicle while drinking alcohol or smoking or ingesting a marijuana product punishable as an infraction or misdemeanor; and WHEREAS, according to the Centers for Disease Control, more than 10,000 people were killed in crashes involving a drink driver in California between 2003 and 2012; and WHEREAS, the California DMV has reported an increase in both alcohol-involved and drug-involved crash fatalities in 2012 and 2013; and WHEREAS, SB 65 would strengthen laws prohibiting consumption of alcoholic beverages while operating a vehicle and make it illegal to smoke or ingest marijuana while driving. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of Saratoga does hereby support SB 65 and urges the California State Legislature and the Governor of California to sign this bill into law. The above and foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Saratoga City Council held on the 1 st day of February 2017 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Emily Lo, Mayor ATTEST: DATE: Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk 41 SENATE BILL No. 65 Introduced by Senator Hill (Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Low) December 29, 2016 An act to amend Section 23220 of, and to add Section 23219 to, the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles. legislative counsel’s digest SB 65, as introduced, Hill. Vehicles: alcohol and marijuana: penalties. Existing law makes it an infraction to drink any alcoholic beverage while driving a motor vehicle upon any highway or on other specified lands. This bill would instead make driving or operating a vehicle upon any highway or specified lands, or driving or operating a boat, vessel, or aircraft while drinking any alcoholic beverage, punishable as either an infraction or a misdemeanor. The bill would also make driving or operating a vehicle, boat, vessel, or aircraft while smoking or ingesting marijuana or marijuana products an offense punishable as an infraction or a misdemeanor. The bill would authorize a court to order a defendant to attend drug or alcohol education and counseling classes in addition to those penalties. By creating new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes. 99 42 The people of the State of California do enact as follows: line 1 SECTION 1. Section 23219 is added to the Vehicle Code, to line 2 read: line 3 23219. (a)  A person shall not drive or operate a vehicle, boat, line 4 vessel, or aircraft while smoking or ingesting marijuana or line 5 marijuana products. line 6 (b)  (1)  A violation of subdivision (a) may be punished as an line 7 infraction or a misdemeanor. line 8 (2)  The court may order a defendant convicted of a misdemeanor line 9 and sentenced to a term of imprisonment in a county jail to be line 10 imprisoned on days other than days of regular employment for the line 11 defendant, as determined by the court. line 12 (c)  In addition to the penalties specified in subdivision (b), the line 13 court may, in its discretion, order the defendant to attend drug line 14 education and counseling classes. line 15 SEC. 2. Section 23220 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read: line 16 23220. (a)  No person shall A person shall not drink any line 17 alcoholic beverage while driving a motor or operating a boat, line 18 vessel, or aircraft, or while driving or operating a vehicle upon line 19 any highway or on any lands described in subdivision (b). line 20 (b)  As used in subdivision (a), “lands” means those lands to line 21 which the Chappie-Z’berg Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Law of line 22 1971 (Division 16.5 (commencing with Section 38000)) applies line 23 as to off-highway motor vehicles, as described in Section 38001. line 24 (c)  (1)  A violation of subdivision (a) may be punished as an line 25 infraction or a misdemeanor. line 26 (2)  The court may order a defendant convicted of a misdemeanor line 27 and sentenced to a term of imprisonment in a county jail to be line 28 imprisoned on days other than days of regular employment for the line 29 defendant, as determined by the court. line 30 (d)  In addition to the penalties specified in subdivision (b), the line 31 court may, in its discretion, order the defendant to attend alcohol line 32 education and counseling classes. line 33 SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to line 34 Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because line 35 the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school line 36 district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or line 37 infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty line 38 for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of 99 — 2 —SB 65 43 line 1 the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within line 2 the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California line 3 Constitution. O 99 SB 65— 3 — 44 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:February 1, 2017 DEPARTMENT:City Manager’s Office PREPARED BY:Lauren Pettipiece, Administrative Analyst I SUBJECT:Community Event Grant Program Application RECOMMENDED ACTION: Review Community Event Grant Program application for this fiscal year and provide direction. BACKGROUND: The City Council typically considers Community Event Grant Program funding requests during a formal application period between January and March. Although the majority of applications are brought to the Council during that time, individual applicants are allowed to come before the Council for consideration any time throughout the year. In March of 2016, the City Council allocated $35,000 to the Community Event Grant Program for Fiscal Year (FY)2016/17, with $42,000 awarded to 15 events after applications were received. On January 20, 2017, staff received an application for the Shushan County Fair hosted by Congregation Beth David on March 12, 2017.The request is for $1,000 and the total cost of the event is estimated at $5,225. The full application is included in Attachment A. The applicant has not applied for or received funding previously. The applicant has been encouraged to attend the February 1, 2017 Council meeting to answer any questions regarding their application.The event does meet the two basic criteria to be considered for grant funding: A) events must be held in Saratoga,and B) events must be open to the public. All allocated funding was awarded for the FY 2016/17 Community Event Grant Program. Not all reimbursement requests have been received yet, so it is possible that there will be unused funds come the end of the Fiscal Year. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A –Congregation Beth David Shushan County Fair Grant Application 45 City of Saratoga Community Event Grant Application SUMMARY OF EVENT Event Name: Event Date: Event Hours: Event Location: Grant Request: Total Event Cost: CONTACT FOR GRANT APPLICATION Contact Name: Title: Organization: Address: Phone: Email: ABOUT THE EVENT Event Description: Estimated Attendance: One Time Event … Annual Event … Funding Amount Received from City in Past: Other Funding Sources: Include source & amount Event Promotion Plan: Advertising & marketing Prior Event Organizing Experience: Describe the experience of the event coordinator and the organization requesting funds Building Community: How will your event build a sense of community? Shushan County Fair ( Shushan was the city in Persia in which the Esther story takes place) 11:00 am - 3:00 pm 19700 Prospect Rd. Saratoga CA 95070 $5,225 Rabbi Leslie Alexander Rabbi Of Community Engagement and Outreach Congregation Beth David 19700 Prospect Rd. Saratoga CA 95070 alexander@beth-david.org See attached $0 This event has no direct funding sources. All contributions are "in kind". See attached! Congregation Beth David has extensive experience with presenting well planned and coordinated large events both formal and informal. The professionals involved with volunteers on this event are Rabbi Leslie Alexander; Rabbi of Community Engagement and Outreach and Andrea Ammerman; Program and Membership Associate.! !Congregation Beth David just dedicated its new synagogue building and we hope to reach out to the entire Saratoga community and invite them to experience not only our newly built home, but to share aspects of our community’s culture at a time of a happy Jewish holiday. Our neighbors will be able to not only enjoy the "Shushan County Fair", but learn more about Jewish heritage in the Silicon Valley. 3/12/17 $1,000 408-257-3333 375 See Attached 46 EVENT BUDGET: Please attach an itemized list of event expenses. Identify the items you are requesting grant funding for. /ĨŶĞĞĚĞĚ͕ attach additional sheets to answer application questions. SUBMIT TO: >ĂƵƌĞŶWĞƚƚŝƉŝĞĐĞ ~ City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 Office: (408) 868-1275 ~ Fax: (408) 867-8559 Email: ůƉĞƚƚŝƉŝĞĐĞ@saratoga.ca.us INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE AGREEMENT Applicant hereby agrees, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, to indemnify, defend and hold the City of Saratoga, its officers, officials, agents, employees, boards, commissions, and volunteers free and harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, causes of action, damages, liabilities, costs of expenses (including the cost of attorney’s fees for defending any action brought against the City or any of its, officers, officials, agents, employees, boards, commissions, and volunteers), arising out of or in any manner relating to any form of loss, injury, or damage sustained by Applicant or any person in connection with or in any way relating to the event described above. Applicant further agrees that as a condition of receiving funding from the City applicant will have in effect in connection with the event liability insurance coverage in the amount of at least $1 million. The insurance coverage will name the City of Saratoga, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insured. Applicant must provide a “Certificate of Insurance” with “Additional Insured Endorsement” to the City prior to holding the event described above. Applicant Name Applicant Signature Date Rabbi Leslie Alexander 1-20-17 47 Event Description: The Jewish holiday of Purim includes a tradition of creating a carnival. Generally these have been rather small events that provide fun for the synagogue’s children. This year, Beth David has decided to expand the experience for the whole community, by offering a game midway with prizes, 5 inflatable rides including a 20 foot slide, a full petting zoo, entertainment by several musicians, an exhibition hall with craft and interactive demonstrations featuring Jewish cultural explanations of traditions and holidays. There will be contests and craft vendors, communal organization booths and food provided by the synagogue that highlight the cultural traditions of the holiday. In addition, there will be a “white elephant” sale and a used book sale. Participants will have the opportunity to taste some classic Purim treats. Attendance: 425 for this 1st year expanded event, anticipate subsequent year 20% increase in attendance. Event Promotion Plan: Ad in JValley News (Jewish Community Newspaper), Out and About magazine (Found in grocery stores and other public spaces), posters on public bulletin boards (i.e.Starbucks), banner at Saratoga intersection, flyers distributed to community organizations (Saratoga ministerial organization), internal Congregation Beth David advertising, Facebook, online community calendars for family events. 48 Expenses "Pony Up": Petting Zoo $500 Materials for game construction $400 Bali Baly Jump: Inflatables,Cotton Candy, Snowcone machine $1,500 Prizes $350 Games refurbishment $350 Virtual Reality Game $350 Entertainment $500 Decorations $150 Advertising and printing $1,125 Total $5,225 49 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:February 1, 2017 DEPARTMENT:City Attorney PREPARED BY:Richard Taylor, City Attorney SUBJECT:Use of Public Right of Way for Surveillance Cameras RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept staff report and provide direction to staff. BACKGROUND: At its September 21, 2016 meeting the City Council directed staff to report on private security cameras on the public right of way through encroachment permits. Staff has reviewed the matter and determined that private security cameras are permitted in the public right of way pursuant to an encroachment permit. Data from those cameras would be the property of the owner of the camera and not the City and, unless for some reason provided to the City, would not be subject to public disclosure under the Public Records Act. As discussed below, in order to avoid a proliferation of cameras and to ensure the data is used in a manner that is respectful of residents’ privacy interests, staff plans to issue permits only to bona fide homeowners’ associations that agree to use the data only for security purposes. DISCUSSION The City Code provides authority for the City to allow use of the public right of way for private security cameras. The Code gives the Director of Public Works discretion to approve or deny private use of public rights of way. Use is authorized by an encroachment permit. Under Article 10-20 (Encroachments) of the Code, any “structure, object or improvement…placed, erected or constructed, either in, under or over any public street” must be approved by the City. The Public Works Department issues encroachment permits, and is tasked with establishing standards for encroachments. The Code provides that encroachment permits are not a matter of right and may be denied for any reason. Applicants must execute indemnification agreements with the City and may be required to obtain liability insurance. The City may impose conditions in addition to those specifically required under the Code, as needed to insure proper installation, completion and maintenance of the encroachment and the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. 50 Finally, in contrast to land use approvals for use of private property, encroachment permits are revocable licenses which may be revoked at any time on ten days’ written notice from the City. Some residents have expressed concern that data from security cameras could be considered a public record subject to the disclosure requirements of the Public Records Act. The Public Records Act, however, applies only to records that are “prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency…” (Government Code section 6252(e).). In the case of private security cameras, the City would have no control over the images or other data and therefore would not be preparing, owning, using, or retaining the data. Data proved to law enforcement in connection with an investigation would be exempt from disclosure. (Government Code section 6254(f).) Under these circumstances the images and other data would not be subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act Although data from private security cameras is not a public record, staff recognizes that residents may be concerned regarding the private use of information gathered from the public right of way. In addition, residents may be concerned with the aesthetic impacts that could arise from a proliferation of security cameras. Accordingly, pursuant to the discretion granted to staff under the City Code, staff has developed the attached guidelines for review of applications for private security cameras in the public right of way. The guidelines include the following: Applications must be from bona fide homeowners associations and cameras must be in locations within the boundaries of the association. This will ensure that cameras are placed only in locations where the residents subject to the greatest degree of surveillance by the cameras are supportive of the installation. The homeowners’ association must have a Board elected by association residents. This will ensure that residents have a voice in connection with the placement and operation of the cameras. The applicant must agree that images and other data from the cameras will be used only for security purposes. This will ensure that data is not made available to third parties for commercial use or otherwise used for purposes unrelated to homeowner security. As with images and data from security cameras on private property, images and data may be provided to the Sherriff’s Department upon request in connection with any investigation being conducted by the Department. The design of the camera and related infrastructure should be compatible with the surrounding environment to the extent practicable and otherwise avoid adverse impacts to public heath and safety. Staff has worked to keep the initial guidelines simple and straightforward. If issues arise in the course of administering encroachment permit applications, staff will adjust the guidelines accordingly. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A -- Guidelines for Private Security Cameras in the Public Right of Way 51 Attachment A City of Saratoga Department of Public Works Standards for Encroachment Permits for Private Security Cameras In order to protect of the public health, safety and welfare, encroachment permits for private security cameras in a public right of way shall comply with the following standards: I. Only Homeowners’ Associations (“HOA”) meeting the following requirements may receive encroachment permits for security cameras from the City of Saratoga (“City”): The HOA must govern a common interest development which has recorded a declaration containing a legal description of the common interest development, the name of the HOA, and any restrictions on the use or enjoyment of any portion of the common interest development that are intended to be enforceable equitable servitudes. The HOA must have Articles of Incorporation which are filed with the California Secretary of State identifying the HOA as an association formed to manage a common interest development. The HOA must have a board of directors (“Board”). The Board must be elected by a vote of the HOA’s residents. The HOA’s Board must hold regular meetings; members must be given four days advance notice of the time and place of such meetings (except in the case of emergency meetings). Minutes of board meetings must be made available to HOA members within 30 days of each meeting. The HOA’s Board must pass a resolution at a regular board meeting adopting a security policy that conforms to the requirements listed below. II. Mandatory HOA security policies: The HOA agrees to only make security images and other data available to residents of the HOA eighteen years of age or older, with an exception for the Santa Clara County Sherriff’s Office, as provided below. All HOA residents seeking access to security images and other data must agree that the data will be used only for home security purposes, and must additionally agree to not sell the data, use it for a commercial purpose, or make it publically available. The HOA agrees that security images and other data may be shared with the Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office when requested in connection with an investigation. The HOA must keep a record of who is provided access to security images and other data and what particularly that person was given access to. The City shall be entitled to inspect such records upon request to the HOA’s Board. 52 If any of these mandatory security policies are not complied with by a HOA Board or any of its residents, the City retains the right to, at its discretion, revoke the HOA’s encroachment permit and require that the HOA remove the previously-permitted security camera at the HOA’s own cost. 846514.2 53 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:February 1, 2017 DEPARTMENT:Community Development Department PREPARED BY:Sandy L. Baily, Special Projects Manager SUBJECT:Authorization for Points of Interest Markers RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt a resolution authorizing a process for establishing Points of Interest Markers on public property or within a street right of way. BACKGROUND: In February 2016, the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC)discussed their 2016/2017 work plan with City Council. One of the items on the HPC’s work plan was to properly recognize properties and heritage resources by installing markers. The Council directed the HPC to return to Council with more developed information of the process and recognition proposed. DISCUSSION: Public Interest Markers are intended to commemorate events and places that are identified with the City that are no longer in existence. Exhibit A of Attachment 1 outlines the proposed process for reviewing markers candidates as recommended by the HPC and the City Attorney has conducted a legal review of the HPC’s proposal. To ensure that the City markers do not have any unintended consequences related to additional permitting reviews or constraints that could be triggered by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) due to historic/cultural resources designation, the process has been written to: 1) clarify that the marker is not identifying a heritage site, 2) does not signify a cultural or historic resource,3) nor is it associated with a local historic or heritage resources inventory such as the City’s Heritage Resources Inventory. The proposed marker is solely a Point of Interest and only details facts about the City, events, or places. To summarize the process, the text for each proposed marker shall be drafted, reviewed and edited by the HPC and the Director of Community Development. The Director of Public Works is responsible for recommending approval of the marker location in consultation with HPC and the Director of Community Development. The final text, marker design and location shall be approved by the City Council or its designee. 54 The markers would be placed on public property or within a street right of way, not on private property. When located within a street right of way, the City will work with property owners to discuss the location of the marker if it is proposed to be placed in front of their property. Two examples of potential marker sites are on Saratoga Avenue to note the site of the Theater Glade/Saratoga Inn and one of the past Blossom Festival sites. FISCAL STATEMENT: The marker costs are proposed to be funded out of the General Fund and would be included in the Community Development budget that is reviewed and approved annually by the City Council. The estimated cost of a Point of Interest Marker is $2,000. If the two potential sites were approved for a marker, the total cost would be $4,000. Additional staff cost related to the program are considered minimal and would be absorbed in the cost to staff the Heritage Preservation Commission. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Resolution 55 Attachment 1 RESOLUTION No. --- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA AUTHORIZING A PROCESS FOR ESTABLISHING POINTS OF INTEREST MARKERS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY OR WITHIN A STREET RIGHT OF WAY WHEREAS,the City of Saratoga Heritage Preservation Commission was established by the City Council in 1982 to assist and encourage the preservation of Saratoga heritage resources, and WHEREAS, the Heritage Preservation Commission presented to the City Council of Saratoga at the February 17, 2016 Council Retreat a work plan item to consider a marker program to increase the public knowledge, understanding and appreciation of the City’s past by commemorating events and places that are identified with the region that are no longer in existence WHEREAS, the City Council of Saratoga, at the February 17, 2016 Council Retreat, directed the Heritage Preservation Commission to develop a process for the types of recognitions proposed, and WHEREAS, the City Council of Saratoga determined that a site marked as a Point of Interest does not signify the site as a cultural or historical resource, is not identifying a heritage site nor is it to be associated with the Saratoga’s Heritage Resources Inventory. WHEREAS, the Heritage Preservation Commission recommends to the City Council that the process for creating Point of Interest Markers as outlined in Exhibit A attached hereto be adopted; and WHEREAS, this action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act because there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment (CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)). NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Saratoga hereby adopts the process for creating Point of Interest Markers as outlined in Exhibit A. 56 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Saratoga on this 1st day of February 2017 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ____________________________ Emily Lo, Mayor Attest: Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk 57 Page 1 of 2 Saratoga Roadside Point of Interest Markers The purpose of the City of Saratoga’s Point of Interest Marker program is to increase the public knowledge, understanding and appreciation of the City’s past by commemorating events and places that are identified with the region that are no longer in existence. A site marked as a Point of Interest under this program does not signify the site as a cultural or historical resource. The Point of Interest Markers program is not associated with Saratoga’s Heritage Resources Inventory. The Point of Interest marker is not identifying a heritage site. The text for each proposed marker shall be drafted, reviewed and edited by the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) and the Director of Community Development. The Director of Public Works is responsible for recommending approval of the marker location in consultation with HPC and the Director of Community Development. The final text, marker design and location shall be approved by the City Council. Procedure for Developing and Submitting a Point of Interest Marker and the Approval Process 1. Research and Writing of the Point of Interest Marker Text. The HPC will research the significance of the site. The text for each proposed marker shall be drafted, reviewed and edited by the HPC and the Director of Community Development. 2. Suggest a Suitable Marker Location. The marker will be placed on public property or a street right-of-way. The HPC and Directors of Community Development and Public Works will evaluate the proposed location based on its association with the marker subject and safety. City staff and the HPC will work with the property owner(s) to discuss the location if the marker is proposed to be placed in front of their property. 3. Suggest a Design of the Marker. The HPC will work with the Director of Public Works in designing and creating the marker which includes materials and colors. The design of the marker will be based on the proposed location and the context of its surroundings. 4. Final Decision. The City Council will have final approval authority regarding whether or not there should be a marker, and if so, will have final approval authority of the design, material, colors, text, and location. 5. Manufacturing and Placement of the Marker. The Director of Public Works will contract for the manufacture of the marker with the final approved text. The cost of the marker will be paid through the HPC budget. The Public Works Department will be responsible for erecting and maintaining the sign. 6. Public Announcement. HPC and the Director of Community Development will develop a press release which will be approved by the City Manager’s Office. 58 Page 2 of 2 Placement of Point of Interest Markers 1. The marker shall be placed on a street right-of-way as near as possible to the site it marks. 2. Markers will not be placed on a curve or hill in such a place at which a slowing car could cause a traffic hazard. 3. Markers will not be placed where they will impede pedestrian circulation. 4. Wherever possible the marker will be placed at a pull-off where an automobile will be able to park completely off the traveled portion of the roadway. 5. The marker shall be located so that its post does not interfere with underground utilities. December 5, 2016 59 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:February 1, 2017 DEPARTMENT:City Manager’s Office PREPARED BY:Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk/Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT:Formation of Public Safety Task Force RECOMMENDED ACTION: Provide direction to staff. BACKGROUND: Per direction from the City Council, this item has been placed on the City Council’s agenda to provide the Council with the opportunity to discuss the possibility of forming a Public Safety Task Force. To aid discussion and provide a starting point for consideration of a Task Force, Mayor Emily Lo has provided a recommended purpose and membership for the City Council to consider. Mayor Lo has proposed that the Task Force be formed for a limited term for the purpose of planning a community public safety event to bring residents together, inform residents about public safety resources available to them, create greater awareness of all aspects of public safety from crime prevention to emergency planning, and to strengthen partnerships with first responders, including the Sheriff’s Office and the Fire Department. This could include a Public Safety Day or National Night Out featuring presentations, displays, and the opportunity to meet members of the Sheriff’s Office and County Fire Department. At the conclusion of the event, the City Council could consider terminating the Task Force or providing future assignments. Additionally, Mayor Lo recommends that the Task Force be comprised of 5 members –each nominated by a member of the City Council. A Task Force that reports to and is comprised of members appointed by the City Council would be subject to the Brown Act. Public Records Act, and Political Reform Act.Consequently, meetings would need to be conducted and posted in accordance with the Brown Act and members would need to file Form 700s with the City. In addition to these State legal requirements, the City Council may also want to consider applying City policies to the Task Force that City Commissions are subject to. These include guidelines in the Council Norms for relationships with the City Council and Commissions, parliamentary procedure, and rules of conduct at public meetings; E-Communications Policy; Meeting Length 60 Guidelines; Action Minutes Policy; Code of Ethics and Values; Expense Policy; and Donation Policy. Another consideration in creation of a Public Safety Task Force is the Council’s desired level of staff involvement in the Task Force. Staffing will be necessary to ensure compliance with the Brown Act and other standards that the City is subject to. Additional staff time may be warranted depending on the duties of the Task Force and desired staff support for these duties. 61 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:February 1, 2017 DEPARTMENT:City Manager’s Office PREPARED BY:Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk/Asst. to the City Manager SUBJECT:City Council Meeting Schedule RECOMMENDED ACTION: Provide direction to staff regarding the City Council’s 2017 meeting schedule. BACKGROUND: This item has been placed on the City Council agenda to provide the City Council with the opportunity to consider a summer recess. With the exception of 2012, the Council has canceled the last meeting in July and the first meeting in August since 2011. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A –City Council Regular Meeting Calendar for 2017 62 Sunday S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 3 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 4 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 5 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 6 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 2 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 4 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 5 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 6 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 3 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 4 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 Regular City Council Meeting 43070 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL 42856 42887 42917 42948 2017 SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER 42736 42767 42795 42826 MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST 42979 43009 43040 63 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:February 1, 2017 DEPARTMENT:City Manager’s Office PREPARED BY:Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk/Asst. to the City Manager SUBJECT:Adoption of City Council Assignments –Ministerial Association RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the resolution amending the City Council assignments. BACKGROUND: At the December 21, 2016 City Council Meeting, the City Council adopted an updated list of City Council assignments for 2017.A conflict has arisen for the alternate for the Saratoga Ministerial Association and new alternate needs to be selected. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A –Resolution Amending City Council Assignments Attachment B –City Council Assignments 64 RESOLUTION 17-___ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA AMENDING CITY COUNCIL ASSIGNMENTS FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2017 WHEREAS, representatives from the City Council serve on various agencies and committees; and WHEREAS, the responsibility for representing the City Council should be shared by all members; and WHEREAS, the City Council annually reviews agency and committee assignments to update and reassign members as needed; and WHEREAS, the City Council established City Council Assignments for 2017 via Resolution 16- 080, but needs to assign a new Alternate to the Saratoga Ministerial Association; and WHEREAS, this resolution amends the City Council Assignments as follows: Assignment Council Member Alternate Saratoga Ministerial Association Miller NOW, THEREFORE,be it resolved that the City Council does hereby approve the amended City Council assignments, attached to this resolution; and members of the Council hereby agree to their appointments through December 2017 or until amended. Attachments: Exhibit A – Amended 2017 City Council Assignments The above and foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Saratoga City Council held on the 1 st day of February 2017 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ______________________________ Emily Lo, Mayor ATTEST: DATE: Crystal Bothelio, City Clerk 65 2017 SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL ASSIGNMENTS Adopted via Resolution No. 17-__ Agency Assignments -Voting Council Member Alternate Association of Bay Area Governments Bernald Kumar Cities Association of Santa Clara County Cappello Bernald Cities Association of Santa Clara County –Legislative Action Committee Bernald Cappello Cities Association of Santa Clara County –Selection Committee Bernald Cappello Hakone Foundation Board Bernald N/A Hakone Foundation Board & Executive Committee Lo N/A KSAR Community Access TV Board Lo Bernald Santa Clara County Expressway Plan 2040 Policy Advisory Board Kumar N/A Santa Clara County Housing and Community Development (HCD) Council Committee Cappello Bernald Santa Clara County Library Joint Powers Authority Lo Kumar Santa Clara Valley Water District Commission Kumar Miller Saratoga Area Senior Coordinating Council (SASCC)Cappello Bernald Silicon Valley Clean Energy Authority Board of Directors Miller Lo Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Policy Advisory Committee Miller Kumar VTA State Route 85 Corridor Policy Advisory Board Miller Bernald West Valley Mayors and Managers Association Lo Bernald West Valley Sanitation District Cappello Bernald West Valley Solid Waste Management Joint Powers Authority Bernald Lo Liaison Assignments -Non-Voting Council Member Alternate America in Bloom Committee Miller Kumar Saratoga Chamber of Commerce & Destination Saratoga Kumar Lo Saratoga Historical Foundation Bernald Lo Saratoga Ministerial Association Miller Saratoga Sister City Organization Kumar Bernald Council Committee Assignments Council Member 2nd Council Member Council Finance Committee Miller Lo Public Art Committee Lo Bernald 66