Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-12-2012 Planning Commission PacketTable of Contents Agenda 3 November 28, 2012 Draft Minutes 5 Application PDR 12-0022; 13921 Ravenwood Drive (403-23- 042); Rob and Laura Hastings / Michelle Miner - The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a new second-story addition to an existing single-story 2,143 square foot home. The new home would be 3,038 square feet in area and approximately 22 feet in height. Staff Contact: Cynthia McCormick (408) 868-1230. staff report 7 resolution 12 Green Building Checklist 16 Notice 27 Neighbor Forms 33 Neighbor correspondence 39 Plans 53 Application CUP12-0007 & ENV12-007; 21990 Prospect Road (366-29-007); Saratoga Country Club - The applicant is requesting modification of their existing Conditional Use Permit to affirm the use of the property as a Community Facility and to install lights to illuminate three tennis courts. A Negative Declaration has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Staff Contact: Christopher Riordan (408)868-1235. Staff Report 61 Attachment 1 - Resolution 67 Attachment 2 - Initial Study & Negative Declaration 71 Attachment 3 - Public Hearing Notice 90 Attachment 4 - Project Description 91 Attachment 5 - Copies of Previous Use Permits 94 Attachment 6 - Photographs of Existing Tennis Courts & Lights 112 Attachment 7 - Photometric Lighting Plan 118 Attachment 8 - Neighoring Properties Distance Exhibit 119 Attachment 9 - Lighting Technical Specifications 120 Attachment 10 - Partial Site Plan 124 Application PDR 12-0018; 1777 Saratoga Avenue / 386-10-049; Sprint / Kato Brothers - The applicant is requesting Design Review approval to replace three existing antennas and add six new remote radio units on an existing telecommunications monopole. The project also includes the replacement of two equipment cabinets in an existing ground level enclosure. Staff Contact: Cynthia McCormick (408) 868-1230. staff report 125 Reso 128 RF Study 132 1 Photo Simulations 174 Coverage Maps 181 plans 183 Zoning Code Amendment ZOA12-0011; A proposal to create a definition for market in the Zoning Code. Staff Report 191 Resolution w/ Draft Ordinance 193 2 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, December 12, 2012 REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. – CIVIC THEATER/COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES Action Minutes from the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of November 28, 2012 COMMUNICATIONS FROM COMMISSION & PUBLIC Oral Communications on Non-Agendized Items Any member of the Public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three (3) minutes on matters not on this agenda. The law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Planning Commission may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Planning Commission direction to Staff. REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS If you wish to appeal any decision on this Agenda, you may file an “Appeal Application” with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15-90.050 (b). PUBLIC HEARING All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. Applicants and their representatives have a total of ten minutes maximum for opening statements. Members of the Public may comment on any item for up to three minutes. Applicants and their representatives have a total of five minutes maximum for closing statements. 1. Application PDR 12-0022; 13921 Ravenwood Drive (403-23-042); Rob and Laura Hastings / Michelle Miner - The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a new second-story addition to an existing single-story 2,143 square foot home. The new home would be 3,038 square feet in area and approximately 22 feet in height. Staff Contact: Cynthia McCormick (408) 868-1230. Recommended action: Adopt Resolution No. 12-051 approving the project subject to conditions of approval. 2. Application CUP12-0007 & ENV12-007; 21990 Prospect Road (366-29-007); Saratoga Country Club - The applicant is requesting modification of their existing Conditional Use Permit to affirm the use of the property as a Community Facility and to install lights to illuminate three tennis courts. A Negative Declaration has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Staff Contact: Christopher Riordan (408)868-1235. Recommended action: Adopt Resolution No. 12-050 thereby adopting the Negative Declaration and approving the Conditional Use Permit modifications. 3 3. Application PDR 12-0018; 1777 Saratoga Avenue / 386-10-049; Sprint / Kato Brothers - The applicant is requesting Design Review approval to replace three existing antennas and add six new remote radio units on an existing telecommunications monopole. The project also includes the replacement of two equipment cabinets in an existing ground level enclosure. Staff Contact: Cynthia McCormick (408) 868-1230. Recommended action: Adopt Resolution No. 12-052 approving the project subject to conditions of approval. 4. Zoning Code Amendment ZOA12-0011; A proposal to create a definition for market in the Zoning Code. Recommended action: Adopt Resolution 12-053 recommending approval of the definition of market to the City Council. DIRECTOR/COMMISSION COMMUNICATION ADJOURNMENT In accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, copies of the staff reports and other materials provided to the Planning Commission by City Staff in connection with this agenda are available at the office of the Community Development at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Note that copies of materials distributed to the Planning Commission concurrently with the posting of the agenda are also available on the City website at www.saratoga.ca.us. Any materials distributed by staff after the posting of agenda are available for public review at the Community Development Department at the time they are distributed to the Planning Commission. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (408) 868-1269 or ctclerk@saratoga.ca.us. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II). CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF AGENDA I, Abby Ayende, Office Specialist III for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Planning Commission was posted and available for public review on December 6, 2012 at the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga, CA 95070 and on the City’s website at www.saratoga.ca.us. You can also sign up to receive email notifications when Commission agendas and minutes have been added to the City at website http://www.saratoga.ca.us/contact/email_subscriptions.asp. NOTE: To view previous Planning Commission meetings anytime, go the City Video Archives at www.saratoga.ca.us 4 ACTION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, November 28, 2012 REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. – CIVIC THEATER/COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT 13777 FRUITVALE AVENUE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL (Commissioner Almalech – absent) APPROVAL OF MINUTES Action Minutes from the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of November 14, 2012 Approved as amended, (4:2(abstain-Reis & Hlava):1) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COMMISSION & PUBLIC Oral Communications on Non-Agendized Items Any member of the Public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three (3) minutes on matters not on this agenda. The law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Planning Commission may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Planning Commission direction to Staff. REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS If you wish to appeal any decision on this Agenda, you may file an “Appeal Application” with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15-90.050 (b). PUBLIC HEARING All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. Applicants and their representatives have a total of ten minutes maximum for opening statements. Members of the Public may comment on any item for up to three minutes. Applicants and their representatives have a total of five minutes maximum for closing statements. 1. Application PDR12-0021; Ashley Way (503-08-108); Jim Gasiewski / Terry J. Martin - The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a new two-story single-family dwelling on a vacant lot. The new home would be 5,978 square feet in area and less than 26 feet in height. One tree is requested for removal to construct the project. Staff Contact: Cynthia McCormick (408) 868-1230. Recommended action: Adopted resolution No. 12-048 approving the project subject to conditions of approval. (Approved, 6:1) 2. Application PDR12-0003 & VAR12-0001; 14110 Alta Vista Ave (397-28-025); John and Sandra Wang / Charles Brown - The applicant is requesting Design Review approval to replace an 811 square foot single- story home with a new 1,823 square foot two-story home. The applicant is also requesting a variance for a single-car garage in lieu of a two-car garage and a reduced front setback; 14’7” where 25 feet is required. The new home would be 25 feet, 6 inches in height. Staff Contact: Cynthia McCormick (408) 868-1230. 5 Recommended action: Adopted resolution No. 12-049 approving the project subject to conditions of approval. (Approved, 6:1) DIRECTOR/COMMISSION COMMUNICATION ADJOURNMENT In accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, copies of the staff reports and other materials provided to the Planning Commission by City Staff in connection with this agenda are available at the office of the Community Development at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070. Note that copies of materials distributed to the Planning Commission concurrently with the posting of the agenda are also available on the City website at www.saratoga.ca.us. Any materials distributed by staff after the posting of agenda are available for public review at the Community Development Department at the time they are distributed to the Planning Commission. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (408) 868-1269 or ctclerk@saratoga.ca.us. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II). CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF AGENDA I, Abby Ayende, Office Specialist III for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Planning Commission was posted and available for public review on November 21, 2012 at the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Ave., Saratoga, CA 95070 and on the City’s website at www.saratoga.ca.us. You can also sign up to receive email notifications when Commission agendas and minutes have been added to the City at website http://www.saratoga.ca.us/contact/email_subscriptions.asp. NOTE: To view previous Planning Commission meetings anytime, go the City Video Archives at www.saratoga.ca.us 6 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Date: December 12, 2012 Application: PDR12-0022 Location / APN 13921 Ravenwood Drive / 403-23-042 Applicant/Owner: Rob and Laura Hastings / Michelle Miner Staff Planner: Cynthia McCormick, AICP 13921 Ravenwood Drive Page 1 of 5 7 Application No. PDR12-0022; 13921 Ravenwood Drive / 403-23-042 SUMMARY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a new second-story addition to an existing single-story 2,143 square foot home. The new home would be 3,038 square feet in area and approximately 22 feet in height. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 12-051 approving the project subject to conditions of approval. PROJECT DATA: Net Site Area: 8,318 sq. ft. Average Slope: 6.9% General Plan Designation: M-10 Zoning: R-1-10,000 Proposed Allowable/Required Proposed Site Coverage Main House: Driveway: Walkways & Patio: Porches Total Proposed Site Coverage 2.266 sq. ft. 1,490 sq. ft. 320 sq. ft. 260 sq. ft. (52.1%) 4,336 sq. ft. (60%) 4,991 sq. ft. Floor Area First Floor: Second Floor Garage: Total Proposed Floor Area 1,866 sq. ft. 772 sq. ft. 400 sq. ft. 3,038 sq. ft. 3,040 sq. ft. Height (Residence) Lowest Elevation Point Highest Elevation Point Average Elevation Point Proposed Topmost Point 102.00’ 104.50’ 103.25’ ( 22.3’) 125.55’ Maximum Height = (26 Feet) GRADING Minimal No Limit Setbacks Front: Rear (main dwelling): Rear (non-conforming garage): Left Side: Right Side (existing non-conforming): 1st Floor 2nd Floor 1st Floor 2nd Floor 26’5” 42’3” 4’7” 11’8” 6’3” 34’9” 54’4” -- 15’0” 15’5” 25’ 25’ 25’ 7’3” 7’3” 25’ 25’ 25’ 12’3” 12’3” Page 2 of 5 8 Application No. PDR12-0022; 13921 Ravenwood Drive / 403-23-042 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Design Review approval is required for conversion of a single-story structure to a multi- story structure, pursuant to City Code Section 15-45.060(2). Site Description: The 8,318 square foot property is located where the road begins to bend and has a substandard lot width and site area. The neighborhood includes other single- story and two-story homes. The property is currently developed with a 1,743 square foot single-story home and 400 square foot non-conforming detached garage. Both the home and the garage have non-conforming setbacks. It appears that the existing home and garage were built before the City was incorporated. Project Description: The façade of the new home has been designed with a neutral colored stucco exterior, stone accents, and wood trim. The 772 second story addition represents approximately 26% of the total floor area. Privacy impacts are minimized by locating the second-story windows on the right side of the home away from the neighbor to the right. Hedges will be planted on the left side of the property to minimize impacts to the neighbor to the left. The proposed rear setback exceeds that required by code to minimize impacts to the neighbor to the rear. Materials and Colors Detail Colors and Materials Exterior Taupe colored smooth stucco Accent Stone Windows Dark stained wood clad Entry Door Wood Roof Composition shingles – gray Trees: No trees are requested for removal and no work will occur near protected trees. Green Building: The Greenpoints checklist shows a total value of 97 points (attachment 2). The project includes resource efficient landscaping, water efficient fixtures, high efficiency HVAC systems, environmentally preferable flooring, and high efficiency appliances and lighting. Neighbor Notification and Correspondence: Six comment forms were received in addition to three emails. The applicant, neighbors, and staff have been corresponding regarding these concerns (attachment 5). The neighbor to the rear of the subject property has concerns regarding view impacts from their backyard and the size and height of the home in comparison to other homes in the neighborhood. Another property owner also has concerns over the size of the proposed home. Both neighbors have concerns that the addition may possibly lead to other two story homes that might have privacy or view impacts on their properties. Future two-story homes would be reviewed for impacts, per City Code. The proposed second story is setback approximately 54 feet from the rear property line, Page 3 of 5 9 Application No. PDR12-0022; 13921 Ravenwood Drive / 403-23-042 minimizing view impacts to the neighbor to the rear. The proposed floor area is allowed by code and in proportion to the size of the lot. FINDINGS Design Review Findings The findings required for issuance of a Design Review Approval pursuant to City Code Section Article 15-45.080 are set forth below and the Applicant has met the burden of proof to support making all of those required findings: (a) The project avoids unreasonable interference with views and privacy. This finding can be made in the affirmative. The 772 second story addition represents approximately 26% of the total floor area. Privacy impacts are minimized by locating the second- story windows on the right side of the home away from the neighbor to the right. Fast growing hedges will be planted on the left side of the property to minimize impacts to the neighbor to the left. The second story is setback approximately 54 feet from the rear property line, minimizing impacts to the neighbor to the rear. (b) The project preserves the natural landscape. This finding can be made in the affirmative. The lot is flat and requires minimal grading. No trees will be removed and no protected trees are in conflict with the project. Additional landscaping is proposed. (c) The project preserves native and heritage trees. This finding can be made in the affirmative. No trees will be removed and no native trees are in conflict with the project. No heritage trees exist on the property. (d) The project minimizes the perception of excessive bulk. This finding can be made in the affirmative. The project meets all required setbacks, height, and floor area standards. The second story element represents approximately 26% of the total floor area. Earth- toned colored materials and varying rooflines further reduce the perception of bulk. (e) The project is of compatible bulk and height. This finding can be made in the affirmative. The new home will be located across the street from another two-story home and the proposed height is three feet below the maximum height allowed by code. The rear setback also exceeds City Code requirements, further integrating the home with the neighborhood. (f) The project uses current grading and erosion control methods. This finding can be made in the affirmative. The site is relatively flat and the project has been designed to minimize grading and removal of trees. (g) The project follows appropriate design policies and techniques. This finding can be made in the affirmative. The project uses architectural features to break up massing (Policy 1, Technique #6), uses earthtone colors (Policy 2, Technique #1), controls views to adjacent properties and uses landscaping to enhance privacy (Policy 3, Techniques #1 and #3), locates the second story to minimize view blockage (Policy 4, Technique #1), Page 4 of 5 10 Application No. PDR12-0022; 13921 Ravenwood Drive / 403-23-042 Page 5 of 5 locates the second story to allow light, air, and solar access to adjacent homes (Policy 5, Technique #3). ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures”, Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction of one single- family residence in a residential area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 12-051 approving the project, subject to conditions of approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Build it Green Checklist 3. Public hearing notice and mailing addresses 4. Neighbor Notification Forms 5. Neighbor Correspondence (emails between the applicant and neighbors) 6. Reduced Plans (Exhibit A) 11 RESOLUTION NO. 12-051     Attachment 1  A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW NO. PDR12-0021 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY ADDITIOIN TO AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 13921 RAVENWOOD DRIVE WHEREAS, an application was submitted by Michelle Miner on behalf of Rob and Laura Hastings, requesting Design Review approval to construct for a new second-story addition to an existing home for a total of 3,038 square feet in area. Design Review approval is required pursuant to City Code Section 15-45.060. The net site is approximately 8,318 sq. ft. and is located within the R-1-10,000 zoning district. The foregoing work is described as the “Project” in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department completed an environmental assessment for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and recommends that the Planning Commission determine this project exempt. WHEREAS, on December 12, 2012, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application, and considered evidence presented by City staff, the applicant, and other interested parties. NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows: Section 1: The recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: The project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to 14 C.C.R. Section 15303, Class 3 “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures”, of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction of up to three single-family residences and no exception to that exemption applies. Section 3: The project is consistent with the Saratoga General Plan Policies LU 1.1 in that the City shall continue to be predominately a community of single-family detached residences and LU 1.2 to continue to review all residential development proposals to ensure consistency with Land Use Element goals and Policies. Section 4: The project is consistent with the Saratoga City Code in that the design and improvements are consistent with the design review findings in that the project avoids unreasonable interference with views and privacy; preserves the natural landscape, native and heritage trees; minimizes the perception of excessive bulk and is of compatible bulk and height; uses current grading and erosion control methods; and follows appropriate design policies and techniques. Section 5: The City of Saratoga Planning Commission hereby approves application PDR12-0022, for the project located at 13921 Ravenwood Drive, subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 12 Resolution No. 12-051  Page 2    PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission this 12th day of December 2012 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ___________________________________ Tina K. Walia Chair, Planning Commission 13 Resolution No. 12-051  Page 3    EXHIBIT 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PDR12-0022 13921 Ravenwood Drive (403-23-042) 1. All conditions below which are identified as permanent or for which an alternative period of time for applicability is specified shall run with the land and apply to the landowner’s successors in interest for such time period. No zoning clearance, or demolition, or grading for this project shall be issued until proof is filed with the city that a certificate of approval documenting all applicable permanent or other term-specified conditions has been recorded by the applicant with the Santa Clara County Recorder’s office in form and content to the Community Development Director. 2. If a condition is not “Permanent” or does not have a term specified, it shall remain in effect until the issuance by the City of Saratoga of a Certificate of Occupancy or its equivalent. 3. The Owner and Applicant will be mailed a statement, after the time the Resolution granting this approval is duly executed, containing a statement of all amounts due to the City in connection with this application, including all consultant fees (collectively “processing fees”). This approval or permit shall expire sixty (60) days after the date said notice is mailed if all processing fees contained in the notice have not been paid in full. No Zoning Clearance or Demolition, Grading, or Building Permit may be issued until the processing fees have been paid in full (and, for deposit accounts, a surplus balance of $500 is maintained). 4. The Project shall maintain compliance with all applicable regulations of the State, County, City and/or other governmental agencies having jurisdiction including, without limitation, the requirements of the Saratoga Zoning Regulations incorporated herein by this reference. 5. As a condition of this Approval, Owner and Applicant hereby agree to defend, indemnify and hold the City and its officers, officials, boards, commissions, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from and against: a. any and all claims, actions or proceedings to attack, set aside, void or annul any action on the subject application, or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done or made prior to said action; and b. any and all claims, demands, actions, expenses or liabilities arising from or in any manner relating to the performance of such construction, installation, alteration or grading work by the Owner and/or Applicant, their successors, or by any person acting on their behalf. In addition, prior to any Zoning Clearance from the Community Development Director, Owner and Applicant shall execute a separate agreement containing the details of this required Agreement to Indemnify, Hold Harmless and Defend, which shall be subject to prior approval as to form and content by the City Attorney. 14 Resolution No. 12-051  Page 4    COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6. Compliance with Plans. The development shall be located and constructed to include those features, and only those features, as shown on the Approved Plans denominated Exhibit "A". All proposed changes to the Approved Plans must be submitted in writing with plans showing the changes, including a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. 7. Building Division Submittal. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans shall be submitted to the Building Division. These plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance. The construction plans shall, at a minimum include the following: a. Architectural drawings and other plan sheets consistent with those identified as Exhibit “A” on file with the Community Development Department and referenced in Condition No. 6 above; b. The site plan shall contain a note with the following language: “Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the Licensed Land Surveyor of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks comply with the Approved Plans,” which note shall represent a condition which must be satisfied to remain in compliance with this Design Review Approval; c. This signed and dated Resolution printed onto separate construction plan pages; d. All additional drawings, plans, maps, reports, and/or materials required by the Building Division. 8. The owner/applicant shall agree to all conditions required by the Saratoga Building Department. 9. The owner/applicant shall agree to all conditions required by the City Engineer, as applicable. 10. The owner/applicant shall agree to all conditions required by the City Arborist, as applicable, prior to issuance of building permits. 11. The owner/applicant shall agree to all conditions required by the Santa Clara County Fire Department, as applicable. 1   2. The owner/applicant shall agree to all conditions required by the Sewer District, as applicable, prior to issuance of building permits. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 CITY OF SARATOGA Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 (408) 868-1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Saratoga’s Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on: Wednesday, December 12 2012 at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Theater located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. A site visit will also be held by the Planning Commission at the subject property. Please contact the Planning Department for the date and time of the site visit. The public hearing agenda item is stated below. Details of this item are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Please consult the City website at www.saratoga.ca.us regarding Friday office closures. APPLICATION: PDR 12-0022 OWNER/APPLICANT: Rob and Laura Hastings / Michelle Miner ADDRESS/APN: 13921 Ravenwood Drive; Saratoga, CA 95070 / 403-23-042 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a new second-story addition to an existing single-story 2,143 square foot home. The new home would be 3,038 square feet in area and approximately 22 feet, four inches in height. No trees will be removed. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing. This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor’s office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out-of-date information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all residents potentially affected by a project. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Cynthia McCormick, Planner, AICP (408) 868-1230 27 City of Saratoga . Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 'j '3 V-I ~ //t't1 Wooe! Dr , Dear Neighbor, 1 am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. 1 ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga 's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposaL Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408-868-1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware ofthe proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project olans. Neighbor Name: leA' '-v 'f..-J "i"':'~ , A ' Date: o~ \0 ;??O\2X- J Signature: =r r ....... A"¥... \ '.c '-6-Z =\: Neighbor Address : \ '3 g S'1 'J2./)l /\C01 e;,t Neighbor Phone #: L.fe {? --3 7 g:J ~ is 0 IfI have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (pleas~attach additional sheet.s ifnecessary): 0 'C~ \ ~ I,l'l .i? \.\.l ~ leW\. (9u.f ~"'~ \<'10..10\ Applicant Narne: ____________ _ Date: _____ _ Application Number: _______________ _ City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 Planning Department t\€.c€.\\J €'O \')c,\ \ ~ l lj\l CI"1'I Of 51'1'-I'1 0G I' :'! .-J oc\l~'-O ?M€.~ CO"'lA\lN~\ , 33 PROJECT ADDRESS: Dear Neighbor, City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form '171~1 '~CAUon~J O('! c J am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. J ask that youfamiliarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project movesforward. You may contact the City of Saratoga 's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change . If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 -868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans . (1 Q t I&€ ~v~ tb Date: C9e.:t i ( 1!J I 'V Signature: ~~ I Neighbor Address: [ .~ q 14 Ka\l oYt (,0o(X;;l 10r\ ~iC*= Neighbor Phone #: YDr-'B"'£b-040~ If! have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: ____________ _ Date: RECEIVED Application Number : ________________ _ City oj Saratoga Revised JOl24106 OCT 15 2012 CITY OF SARATOGA PI~:NVf'I¥ef!1EVELOPMENT 34 PROJECT ADDRESS: Dear Neighbor, City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form I '3 COl Ra veJl1 Woad Dr , 1 am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All oj the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the streetjrom the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance oj the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. 1 ask that youJamiliarize yourself with the preliminary plansJor the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project movesJorward. You may contact the City oJSaratoga 's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 -868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. . N,;ghbO'Na ~== Q-~~:L:1:/D l 1(\ V SIgnature: ~ C A Neighbor Address: ! 3 q /0 'RQ \rDV1 CAr 60 cI 'Dr N,;ghbo, Phod jpfJ. -3 7Q-1Vz L If! have any initial concerns with the project J may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: ____________ _ Date: _____ _ Appl ication Number: ________________ _ City a/Saratoga Revised 10124106 Planning Department ~€.c€.\,,€.o \jcJ 1 () lfJ\l C\"t'< of S(>.~(>. ,OG"" COtAtA\lNI-r/ O\:-'II\:-LOI'IA\:-N1 35 PROJECT ADDRESS: Dear Neighbor, City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form \ 3Cf2-1 Rq vU'1 wocd -Cr. 1 am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the streetfrom the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. 1 ask that youfamiliarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga 's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408-868-1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name: LftJAI t1 Vf' ba4iJQ Date: Signat"''' ~> Neighbor Addre : I -=)q II ~v-e t1 WOOCl Dr . .to ,!Jl( Iz N'ighbO'Phon'#(~ Ji& jiPsir If! have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: ____________ _ Date: _____ _ RECEIVED Application Number: ________________ _ City of Saratoga Revised 1012 4106 OCT 15 2012 C'TY OF SARATOGA Planning Departme~OMMUN'TY DE.VELOPMENT 36 City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: 13 qg l Rlit VGrt Wo od IT·. Dear Neighbor, J am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. J ask that you familiarize yourself with the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project moves forward. You may contact the City of Saratoga 's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportun ity to rev iew the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408 -868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that J am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. Neighbor Name:~}.,).....o..... ~~~ Date: 10-'"1 -l L.. Signature: .~ ~~ Neighbor Address: \ .~ 9 ;) V 12a IJf!J (,0 oocf, Dr. NeighborPhone #: ~ I~ -g '75* IfJ have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): Applicant Name: ____________ _ Date:. _____ _ Application Number: ________________ _ RECEIVED OCT 15 2012 CITY OF SARATOGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Saratoga Revised 10124106 Planning Department 37 City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form PROJECT ADDRESS: \ ? q ~, '12-0-v-BVl WdCC [ 0 r . Dear Neighbor, I am proposing a project at the above stated address and would like to provide you with an opportunity to review the proposal and provide comments. All of the adjacent neighbors and the neighbors across the street from the property are being provided this notice as a courtesy in advance of the standard City Notice which will be sent out prior to a decision being made on the project. I ask that you familiarize yourselfwith the preliminary plans for the project. These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may be changed as the project movesforward. You may contact the City of Saratoga 's Planning Division at any time to review any changes that may occur. The City of Saratoga asks that this form and a reduced set of plans be signed by each neighbor to indicate that they have had an opportunity to review the proposal. Please be advised that these plans are preliminary and may change. If you have further interest in the project, you may contact the City of Saratoga at 408-868 -1222 and speak with the assigned project planner. My signature below certifies that I am aware of the proposed project and have reviewed the preliminary project plans. N"ghbO'Nam':/t{K' ff. PO)O.£ S'gn""" ~-L ~ '~ Date: Neighbor A"S . { h ,.3 q 31 R-ct tfYl (K) odt; ~ r. 7 ~¢2- Neighbor Phone #: C/o/,-'37 Cf-<?.:1 C 5f If! have any initial concerns with the project I may list them below. My concerns are the following (please attach additional sheets if necessary): \\€.c€.\\I€'O Gc'\ \ tl l~\l Applicant Name: ____________ _ Date: _____ _ Application Number : ________________ _ C ity of Saratoga Revised 10124106 C\"t"{ Of sp..fV:1;°oG:~€.N"t N\~ OE.\JE\..: ,.- Planning D r.Ot.l lAU epd'Ftment 38 From:Robert Hastings To:Karen Colson Cc:Cynthia McCormick; Michelle Miner ; laura hastings Subject:Re: 13921 Ravenwood Proposed Addition Date:Tuesday, December 04, 2012 1:13:32 PM Karen, thanks for the reply. Please let us know if you would like to meet and if you need any further information. Rob and Laura From: Karen Colson <karencolson@att.net> To: Robert Hastings <rhastings123@yahoo.com> Cc: Cynthia McCormick <cmccormick@saratoga.ca.us>; Michelle Miner <shelminer@aol.com>; laura hastings <rob_laura@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 7:53 PM Subject: Re: 13921 Ravenwood Proposed Addition Hello Rob and Laura, Thank you for taking the time to write such a thorough response to my email to Ms. McCormick. It sounds like you have done your homework and considered the various options/restrictions you face with your lot. I know it can be frustrating and I realize your lot has some challenges. My desire is not for "no change at all" but rather that owners not fill up their lots with so much square footage that it's all house and no yard/open space and greenery. You are right, your addition would not affect my view of the hills, but if more and more owners decide to go to second stories, I would be affected as would my privacy and the character of the neighborhood. That i s my concern. You are also correct that I am not presently living in my house. I moved to Santa Cruz in July '08, however, I may be moving back this summer. I lived in Raven Court for 30+ years and raised my children there. I knew Louanne Blaskey and the owner before her. I still consider Raven Court home and come over regularly to check on my house and visit neighbors. I'm sure the Planning Commission will consider all factors and make a decision that they judge to be in the best interests of all concerned. I just felt I should express my feelings and concerns since I was sent the notice and given the opportunity to do so. One of the blessings of living in a democracy~the chance to express our views and be part of the decision making process. Regards, Karen 39 On Dec 3, 2012, at 6:20 PM, Robert Hastings wrote: Karen, We are sorry that you have concerns over our remodel project. Your concerns, as well as those of our other neighbors, have been topmost inour priorities throughout this project. To address those concerns we havemaintained communication with our neighbors whenever we see them,whether it be at a neighborhood gathering/party, at our kids' local schoolor in the neighborhood when we are out playing and walking. Over the17 years we have lived here, we have gotten to know almost every neighbor and that has facilitated the conversations recently. Unfortunately we have never met you and wonder if perhaps you maintain residence elsewhere at this time. We are disappointed we didnot have the same opportunity with you for a conversation in person. Although I am sure you would rather see no change at all, I would like to list a number of items that we think make the change more tolerable: 1) The square footage of the property listed on the notice you received,3038 sq ft, includes our 400 sq ft garage. The final occupied structure iscloser to 2600 sq ft. Michelle Miner is the designer and not an owner or resident. 2) The proposed height is over 3 ft. less than the height allowed percode. This is to partially compensate for the knoll top location of ourhouse as well as to minimize height in general. The first story roof design is intended to overlap and hide some of the second story structure. 3) We have investigated alternatives to a second story. There is very littleroom on either the front or the sides to add square footage, based onour setbacks. There is possibly some room to grow in the back, but thelocation would be not very useful and reduce our already-small backyard. It may not even be possible to keep necessary clearances to the garage, and integrated the existing garage into the main structure is not allowed per code. 4) There should be no obstruction to views of the hills from your propertyaddress. 5) We cannot move the detached garage. This is a nonconforming structure; if we tore it down we would not be able to rebuild or move it. 6) There is already a precedence for a second story and taller homes,given the two homes across the street from us.7) The percentage of square footage of the second story is much less than the first. 8) Even if we did not add a second story, a first story remodel could 40 likely include raising the elevaton of the roofline anyway. The low pitch of the 1950's tract house is out of favor with many current design practices.9) We have shunned some of the "McMansion" design aspects that are sooften seen these days.10) We are using colors and materials that are natural in origin and hue. 11) The quality and value of the resulting home remodel should enhance property values of the neighborhood.12) The neighborhood is in transition, with a number or remodelsrecently completed or underway. Each project is uniquely reflecting thedesires of the owners.Please let us know if you would like to meet and if you need any further information. Sincerely, Rob and Laura Hastings 13921 Ravenwood Dr. From: Karen Colson [mailto:karencolson@att.net] Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 1:36 PM To: Cynthia McCormick Subject: 13921 Ravenwood Proposed Addition Dear Ms. McCormick, Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed addition to 13921 Ravenwood Drive (#403-23-042). Although I can appreciate the desire of the Hastings/Miner to add to their home, I do not feel that such an addition would be appropriate for the neighborhood. As you know, Ravenwood slopes down from Quito towards the creek. 13921 Ravenwood is at almost the highest point of that slope. A second story would be visible to all the surrounding homes and affect their privacy and view. It also sets a precedent and I personally would not like to see our lovely neighborhood filled with "monster" homes. 3,036 sqft seems a bit much for the lot size and area and the 22 feet height sitting at such a high point in the neighborhood would definitely be intrusive to neighbors. Most of the original homes were approximately 1500 sqft. Fortunately most of the lots were quite large and allowed for fairly significant additions without affecting the privacy or views of the neighbors. My home at 13851 Raven Court was purchased in May '71. When we decided to add on, we originally planned a second story but were told that second stories were not allowed~even though our lot was large (.29 acres) and such an addition would not impact the view or privacy of any neighbors. 41 We then had an architect draw up plans to add on to the front of the house. That was denied because, although we were within the 26 foot setback, the addition would have gone over the additional 8 foot easement for sidewalks (which someone told me privately would never be put in.) But we loved the neighborhood and our neighbors so we had another plan drawn up which was approved. It forced us to extend the length of the house significantly, and make the home much less functional and attractive than the previous plan to come out front (which all the neighbors preferred!). It also cost a lot more!! Although I didn't like the decision, I realized that the concern was for maintaining the quality of the neighborhood. I realize that times change and that you are charged with balancing between the needs/desires of owners and the good of the neighborhood as a whole but It seems to me this is an issue of square footage for one owner vs quality of life for those who purchased because of the open space, privacy and views of the hills. I vote for the latter. Sincerely, Karen Colson 42 From:Judi Becker To:Rob - Laura Hastings; Rob Hastings Cc:Cynthia McCormick; Fred Becker Subject:Fw: Concerns with Hastings" remodel project Date:Thursday, December 06, 2012 12:05:34 AM Dear Rob and Laura, We appreciate your efforts to take the concerns of your neighbors into consideration. This situation is very difficult for us since we sincerely appreciate that you have been good neighbors. The impact of your proposed remodel on us, on our property, is huge in my estimate. I have responded to your comments below in blue. Fred will respond in a separate email with his comments. Fred, Judi, I understand that you were recently in to discuss your concerns about our project with the Saratoga Planning department. Although I am sure you would rather see no change at all, I would like to list a number of items that we think make the change more tolerable. Your concerns, as well as those of our other neighbors, have been topmost in our priorities throughout this project. I'm sure you've spent many months considering and planning your remodel. We've just recently been presented with your plans and have had many things going on in our lives that have taken up our time so that we haven't been able to address this immediately. We were shocked when the orange netting showing your proposed remodel went up the day before Thanksgiving. I was upset, I'm sure you can appreciate how it might affect me after our living here for 38 years. We are trying to address our concerns with consideration for your desires as well as ours. We can see the orange netting outline all along the back of our home, from all the windows on the back, not just the ones directly behind you. We can see the proposed second story when sitting at our dining room table. Our dining room is not directly behind your home, it is on the far end of our home. From our perspective, from our backyard and from our windows, your proposal appears very large, looking over our home and yard, it blocks some of our view of green, of trees, of a long distance view, of our visual space. We have looked to the sky and trees in that direction for 38 years. If your remodel is built then our view would be blocked by a large, high structure with windows looking back at us. That would compromise our privacy; you'd be able to look into some of our bedrooms, our living room, dining room, possibly our family room and most of our backyard. We have planned to take down our patio cover since the tree in back offers shade now but we wouldn't be able to do that if your second story was built because it would 43 be extremely imposing to our property. We've dealt with many changes through the years, change has been a constant in this neighborhood, it is transitioning all the time. Many of these changes have had a big impact and some have not been appealing to us. We can see the trend toward bigger and higher structures, but all have been kept at one story. We understand and accept that change is inevitable but we look to the city of Saratoga, the planning department, to protect our community and home values by ensuring adherence to design review criteria. 1) We have investigated alternatives to a second story. There is very little room on either the front or the sides to add square footage, based on our setbacks. There is some room to grow in the back, but the location would be not very useful, reduce our already-small backyard and encroach our house even closer to your property line. This was illustrated to you with the Sketchup computer model when we last met. It is unfortunate if what you want doesn't fall within the setbacks for the city but that is what everyone has to deal with when remodeling. The Sketchup, on paper and a flat screen, doesn't look at all like seeing the outline of the structure in actuality, against the sky, from our home and property. The outline from our windows and yard is of a very big structure and it obstructs our views. 2) We cannot move the detached garage. This is a nonconforming structure; if we tore it down we would not be able to rebuild or move it. We have had your non-conforming detached garage as a view barrier to deal with all these years. 3) We have intentionally kept the height of the roof lower than what is allowed by the city code, by two feet, to reduce the apparent mass. The first story roof design is intended to overlap and hide some of the second story structure. The roofs in the rear are hip roofs and pitched away from your property. It's a very big structure. I can't see that any part of the first story roof would hide the second story structure. 4) There is already a precedence for a second story, given the two homes across the street from us. Those are the only two second story homes in this neighborhood, on this side of Quito, and one is just a partial second story, over the garage only. There aren't any others along Ravenwood, Raven Ct, or Montpere on this side of Quito. Ours would be the only home that would have a second story looking into our home and property. The neighbors that have talked with us, without our solicitation, were under the impression that second stories are not allowed here, that is why some of them bought in this neighborhood. It would set a precedence for incoming new owners or even for existing owners wanting to make changes. It would be more of a visual impact and a 44 disaster for us if the house next door to you also puts on a second story. That home at 13931 Ravenwood, Lot 043, is directly behind us. Even the home on the other side of you at 13911 Ravenwood, Lot 041, would have a huge impact on us. I consider our immediate neighborhood as being from Quito & Ravenwood, including Raven Ct, to Quito and Montpere, including all the homes on Montpere. There are approximately 55 homes along those streets, I think that only the two across from you have a second story. If you include the homes along Quito and Espada Ct it is approximaely 65 homes, I don't think any of these have a second story. 5) The percentage of square footage of the second story is much less than the first. 6) The square footage of the property listed on the notice you received, 3038 sq ft, includes our 400 sq ft garage. Neither the square footages nor the plans have changed since we met. This still seems like a lot of square footage covering your property. 7) Even if we did not add a second story, a first story remodel could likely include raising the elevaton of the roofline anyway. The low pitch of the 1950's tract house is out of favor with many current design practices. The higher roof lines that have been done in our neighborhood on a few one story homes have changed and altered the look of this neighborhood considerably, bringing bigger and higher buildings that block the view of the hills, sky, greenery. 8) We have shunned some of the "McMansion" design aspects that are so often seen these days. Others may not shun the McMansion design if second stories start going up in our immediate neighborhood. 9) We are using colors and materials that are natural in origin and hue. While we appreciate your considerations that doesn't mean that others will do the same. 10) Our adjoining lot line represents only a small percentage of your property. While it is true that the adjoining lot line represents only a small percentage of our property, it has the most impact on us since it looks into our backyard and home. The houses on either side of you have driveways separating your properties. The new roof lines for your project can be seen from all the windows on the back of our home, not just the ones directly behind you. This would limit and interfere with our visual space. 11) We have offered to grow plants of your choosing along the back fence. 45 We appreciate your offer, however, plants along your back fence most likely wouldn't be tall enough to screen the second story and would take a long time to grow, possibly years before having any effect. 12) The quality and value of the resulting home remodel should enhance property values of the neighborhood. I'm sure that would be true for your remodeled property but perhaps not for the homes surrounding you. I don't think it would enhance our property value at all because of the impact on our views, inside and outside, and our compromised privacy. We would be looking at a very large structure from our home and yard. I think that this will adversly affect our property value. 13) The neighborhood is in transition, with a number or remodels recently completed or underway. Each project is uniquely reflecting the desires of the owners. In our 38 years here remodels have been ongoing, the neighborhood has always been in transition. We're always adjusting to and accepting changes in the neighborhood. As you said, each project uniquely reflects the desires of the owners. Everyone has their own desires, tastes, style and opinions. We have put on two additions to our home, we have always obtained permits. We haven't been able to have some of our desires approved because of permit restrictions. We're well aware of the desires and styles of our neighbors. These aren't always in line with our wishes. In 38 years we've dealt with, accepted, sometimes been upset by many of these changes in our neighborhood. We share fences with 6 neighbors and have had changes to the fences resulting in different looks, styles, and heights that we have acccepted to accommodate their wishes. We have also tried to be good neighbors. Please let us know if you would like to meet again and if you need any further information. Sincerely, Rob and Laura Hastings 13921 Ravenwood Drive We would like for you to visit our property so that you might see the visual impact of your proposed remodel from our perspective. Sincerely, Judi Becker 13881 Raven Court 46 From:Fred Becker To:rhastings123@yahoo.com; rob_laura@hotmail.com Cc:Cynthia McCormick; Judi Becker (JudiBecker@sbcglobal.net) Subject:My Comments to: Concerns with our remodel project Date:Thursday, December 06, 2012 7:42:50 AM Rob and Laura, Cindy advised that I have until 8am Thursday morning to provide my immediate comments in order to include them in the package going to the Planning Commissioners . I don’t like doing this since you have been and still are great neighbors to us, but your remodel proposal does have a significant visual impact on us from the rear of our house, as well as compatibility issues when comparing your proposed remodel to other adjacent homes in our immediate neighborhood. See my comments below following each of Rob’s points mentioned. Cindy, I will have more supporting documents within the next few days for you, or, I understand that I can also provide them at the very latest during the Planning review meeting on Dec. 12. Thanks and Regards, Fred Becker 13881 Raven Ct. (038) From: Judi Becker [mailto:judibecker@sbcglobal.net ] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 5:21 PM To: Fred Becker Subject: Fw: Concerns with our remodel project ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: Robert Hastings [mailto:rhastings123@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 2:20 PM To: judibecker@sbcglobal.net Cc: Cynthia McCormick; laura hastings; Michelle Miner Subject: Concerns with our remodel project Fred, Judi, 47 I understand that you were recently in to discuss your concerns about our project with the Saratoga Planning department. Although I am sure you would rather see no change at all, I would like to list a number of items that we think make the change more tolerable. Your concerns, as well as those of our other neighbors, have been topmost in our priorities throughout this project. 1) W e have investigated alternatives to a second story. There is very little room on either the front or the sides to add square footage, based on our setbacks. There is some room to grow in the back, but the location would be not very useful, reduce our already-small backyard and encroach our house even closer to your property line. This was illustrated to you with the Sketchup computer model when we last met. Comment: A single story remodel would certainly be preferable to us vs a 2 story since the roofline height would surely be reduced from the proposed 2 story structure. Your existing non-conforming garage is already very near our mutual property line and even though we have never liked it, we have accepted it . 2) We cannot move the detached garage. This is a nonconforming structure; if we tore it down we would not be able to rebuild or move it. Comment: Understood, and as mentioned above, we have had to deal with and accept this non-conforming structure for 38 years and to add more structural bulk and height to our views from the back of our house would be a major impact to me and my family. 3) We have intentionally kept the height of the roof lower than what is allowed by the city code, by two feet, to reduce the apparent mass. The first story roof design is intended to overlap and hide some of the second story structure. The roofs in the rear are hip roofs and pitched away from your property. Comment : I certainly appreciate the effort in not maxing out on roof height, however, even with this 2 feet reduction the roof outlines per the orange pole markers are still not compatible with existing residential structures on adjacent lots to your house and certainly not compatible with other homes in the immediate neighborhood. To me, our immediate neighborhood includes approximately 56 homes on this side of Quito Rd. and on either side of Ravenwood Dr, Raven Ct, Espada Ct. and Montpere Way. 4) There is already a precedence for a second story, given the two homes across the street from us. Comment: Those 2 homes were built about 50 +/- years ago. One property slopes down in the rear and their rear property line is filled with massive shrubs and trees so you 48 can’t really even see the neighbors in their backyard and, I believe vice-versa. The other home has an addition on the top of their garage only. If you use your orange pole markers as an outline reference, then it appears to me that even when compared to these 2 homes across the street from you, that the bulk and height of your proposed structure is not compatible with either of these 2 homes. 5) The percentage of square footage of the second story is much less than the first. Comment : Again, I appreciate the effort in trying to minimize but once the pole markers were installed, the visual impact from most of our backyard and rooms in the rear of our house is, in my opinion, unreasonable. 6) The square footage of the property listed on the notice you received, 3038 sq ft, includes our 400 sq ft garage. Neither the square footages nor the plans have changed since we met. Comment: Yes, I understand and appreciate your clarification. Again, we have had to deal with the negative visual impact of your non-conforming garage for the last 38 years. 7) Even if we did not add a second story, a first story remodel could likely include raising the elevaton of the roofline anyway. The low pitch of the 1950's tract house is out of favor with many current design practices. Comment: Yes, I understand but as mentioned above in item 3, a single story remodel would be preferable to me vs a 2 story since the roofline height would surely be less than the proposed 2 story structure. In addition, we most likely would not have the unreasonable interference with our views from most of our backyard and backyard-facing rooms with a 1 story remodel, even with a somewhat elevated roofline. 8) We have shunned some of the "McMansion" design aspects that are so often seen these days. Comment : I certainly appreciate the effort in shunning a McMansion type design and couldn’t agree with you more, however, based on the orange pole markers in place when you are looking from most anywhere in our backyard area in the direction of your property, I fear the visual impact will have the same feeling as if we were seeing a McMansion type structure. 9) We are using colors and materials that are natural in origin and hue. Comment: Another appreciated effort, and based on what you told us as possible colors and combinations, they all seem reasonable, except the colors will not materially reduce 49 the unreasonable interference with our view and/or the bulk and height incompatibility with existing structures on adjacent properties and those within the immediate neighborhood. 10) Our adjoining lot line represents only a small percentage of your property. Comment: Yes, our common lot line is only about 30 feet in length but the orange pole markers are excessively visible from most of our backyard area, and almost all of our backyard-facing rooms inside the house. The new roof line actually towers over the existing roof line of the non-conforming garage, which as mentioned before, is very close to our adjoining lot line. 11) We have offered to grow plants of your choosing along the back fence. Comment: I appreciate the offer very much but once the orange pole markers were installed, it became very apparent that these plants would only visually mitigate your proposed roof line for the approx. 30 feet of our common property line. As mentioned a number of times before, we would still have an unreasonable view interference due to your proposed high roof line from most of our backyard area. And, I might add that unless your offer includes mature trees and/or shrubs that are at least 9-10 feet high once planted, it would not have any immediate mitigation impact on our view of your high roof- line as shown by the orange pole markers. I really do not want to wait at least 3-5 years or more until any planted trees/shrubs begin to hide or shield your proposed roofline. 12) The quality and value of the resulting home remodel should enhance property values of the neighborhood. Comment: I am sure the value of your home will increase if you complete the proposed 2 story remodel, however, I seriously doubt that the value of our home would increase once your remodel is finalized. As mentioned before, the views from most of our backyard area in the general direction of your home will be interfered with vs your existing home and the incompatibility with the homes surrounding you in terms of bulk and height would, in my opinion, actually lower the value of our home and possibly the other adjacent homes to your property, everything else being equal. I am not a Real Estate expert by any means, so to be fair I checked quickly with one local agent who emphatically stated that in a situation such as ours, there are no guarantees one way or another for enhanced property values or depressed property values. Therefore, I would suggest you use the words could or might instead of should. In other words, no one really knows. . 13) The neighborhood is in transition, with a number or remodels recently completed or underway. Each project is uniquely reflecting the desires of the owners. Comment: I absolutely agree with your statement about the number of and uniqueness 50 of recent remodels completed and/or in process on homes within the neighborhood. I must add that based on a brief analysis of the immediate neighborhood (as defined by me in item 3 above), I came up with the following statistics which, I am sure could be fine- tuned, but in general seems to reflect the overall character and desires of these immediate neighborhood homeowners. a- There are about 56 homes including ours in this immediate neighborhood. b- Of the 56 homes, 54 homes are single story, 1 home is a 2 story and the other home has a second story just above their garage. c- There have been about 12 major/minor remodels completed and/or in progress on homes within the immediate neighborhood within the last approx. 7 years or so. d- 11 of these 12 remodels have been on single story homes and have remained as single story homes . The other remodel/upgrade was on the home which already has the 2 nd story above the garage and which is across the street from you. So yes Rob and Laura, the immediate neighborhood is indeed in transition and has been in various levels of activity as long as we have been living in this wonderful Ravenwood area of Saratoga. And it seems apparent to me that the remodel activity cited above reflects the fact that this ever present transition includes upgrading/remodeling of existing single story structures and not a transition to 2 story structures which are incompatible in bulk and height with the existing homes on adjacent lots and those within the immediate neighborhood. . 14) Please let us know if you would like to meet again and if you need any further information. Comment : I would truly like to invite you and Laura to come over to our house within the next 2 or 3 days to see first hand the perspective that we have of your proposed 2 story remodel. Again, thanks for being the good neighbors that you have been for all these years. Best Regards, Fred Becker 13881 Raven Ct. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- 51 Sincerely, Rob and Laura Hastings 13921 Ravenwood Drive 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Date: December 12, 2012 Application: Conditional Use Permit CUP12-0007 Negative Declaration (ENV12-0002) Location / APN: 21990 Prospect Road / 366-29-007 Owner / Applicant: Saratoga Country Club Staff Planner: Christopher A. Riordan, AICP 21990 Prospect Road 61 SUMMARY ZONING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL (HR) RHC (HILLSIDE CONSERVATION) PARCEL SIZE 98.34 Acres PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Saratoga County Club is a Community Facility located at 21990 Prospect Road which includes a nine-hole golf course, driving range, a 18,982 square foot clubhouse which includes a restaurant and banquet facilities, a golf shop and tennis office, swimming pool, and six tennis courts of which three are illuminated with exterior lighting. The applicant is requesting modification of their existing Conditional Use Permit to install lights to illuminate the remaining three tennis courts. The project is not exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and staff has prepared a proposed Negative Declaration. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the proposed Negative Declaration and approve the application to modify the existing Conditional Use Permit by adopting the attached resolution. Page 2 of 6 62 PROJECT DESCRIPTON AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS Background: The 98.34 acre Saratoga Country Club (the Applicant) is located at 21990 Prospect Road in the Hillside Residential zoning district. The Saratoga Country Club is defined as a Community Facility within the City Code which states that a Community Facility is “….. a facility used for an providing fraternal, social, or recreational programs or activities generally open to the public.” This definition includes swimming pools, recreational courts and golf courses. Surrounding land uses include single-family homes to the north and southeast, Garrod Farms to the south and southwest, and Mid-Peninsula Regional Open District lands to the east. Project Description: A Community Facility is a conditional use in the Hillside Residential Zoning District. In 1958, the Planning Commission approved Use Permit # UP-15 for the Saratoga Country Club to operate as a Community Facility. The Saratoga Country Club has modified their Use Permit numerous times since 1958 as onsite structures were either expanded or newly constructed. Copies of the Use Permits are included as Attachment #5. The Saratoga Country Club currently operates under UP-98-014, granted by the Planning Commission in November 1998, when the Club expanded their membership from 450 to 500 persons. Existing Uses On Site Previous Use Permits for the Saratoga Country Club are not explicit in describing its operation as a Community Facility or its existing uses. The Saratoga Country Club includes a nine-hole golf course with artificial lakes, driving range, cart barn, a 18,982 square foot clubhouse which includes a restaurant and banquet facilities, a golf shop and tennis office, swimming pool, and six tennis courts. Three of the tennis courts are illuminated with exterior lighting. The Saratoga Country Club’s hours of operation are from dawn – 10:00 P.M., 365 days a year. Since this amendment will supersede previous use permits it is important to clearly describe the existing uses at the Saratoga County Club so they are reaffirmed with the approval of the additional tennis court lights described below. Tennis Court Lights The six tennis courts are located adjacent to the parking lot. On August 18, 1977, the Planning Commission approved use permit modification application #UP-15A for the Saratoga Country Club to illuminate three of their six tennis courts. The illumination of the courts is provided by 20 lights located atop 15 poles that are 22 feet in height (five of the poles contain two lights). The Use Permit included a condition of approval that the lights are to be on a timer to automatically turn them off at 10:00 p.m. The Applicant has submitted an application to modify their Use Permit to install lights on the three courts that are not illuminated. The proposed illumination would be provided by 24 lights located atop 16 poles that are 22 feet in height (eight of the poles contain two lights). Similar to the existing lights, the new light poles would be black in color and would include 1,000 watt metal halide bulbs. Each light would include an installed light cutoff shield that would reduce glare as viewed from offsite as well as minimizing light spillover Page 3 of 6 63 beyond the area of the courts. A lighting plan submitted by the applicant (Attachment #6) indicates that the illuminance produced by the lights as measured in foot candles, the measure of the quantity of light that arrives on a surface, would not be measurable beyond the boundaries of the tennis courts. The Applicant’s written project description, included as Attachment #2, states that the tennis courts are used primarily for casual play, league play, and tennis instruction and that these activities are currently limited in the winter months when the days are shorter and only three of the courts are illuminated. City Code Section 15-80.030(c), regulations that pertain to recreational courts, include a restriction that states that recreational courts are not to be illuminated by exterior lighting. Therefore, the three tennis courts that are illuminated would be considered a legal nonconforming use. City Code Section 15-65.100(b) includes the following provision, also a finding of the Use Permit, pertaining to the expansion or intensification of nonconforming uses. “The Planning Commission may approve the expansion and/or intensification of a nonconforming use upon finding that such expansion and/or intensification will not adversely affect existing or anticipated uses in the immediate neighborhood, and will not adversely affect surrounding properties or the occupants thereof.” The Club is partially surrounded by hills which would completely block views of the tennis court lights for the majority of nearby property owners. Approximately ten single-family homes are located on the hill to the east with potential views of the tennis court lights with the nearest of these homes being located 385 yards away (see Attachment #7). Potential negative effects of the lights on these property owners would be mitigated by the design of the lights that focus the light toward the surface of the courts, the installation of light shields that would block views of the light source from off site, and the physical distance from the tennis court to the nearby homes. Additionally, the lighting plan submitted by the Saratoga Country Club indicates that the brightness of the light would not be measurable beyond the boundaries of the tennis courts. Neighbor Notification and Correspondence: The Applicant sent Neighbor Notification Forms for the project to all adjacent neighbors. None of the mailed forms were returned to the applicant or the City. A Public Notice for the Use Permit and the proposed Negative Declaration was mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the project site. Page 4 of 6 64 FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit Findings The findings required for issuance of a Use Permit pursuant to City Code Section 15-55.040 as set forth below and the Applicant has met the burden of proof to support making all of the required findings: (a) The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The Project meets this finding. City Code Section 15-06.160 defines the Saratoga Country Club as a “Community Facility.” The Club is located within the Hillside Residential zoning district and in this district Community Facilities are a conditionally permit use requiring a Use Permit. Other Zoning Ordinance objectives listed in 15-05.020) that would pertain to the project include: [t]o control the physical development of the City in such a manner as to preserve it as essentially a residential community with a rural atmosphere; [t]o promote the stability of existing land uses which conform with the General Plan, and to protect them from inharmonious influences and harmful intrusions; [t]o ensure that public and private lands ultimately are used for the purposes, which are most appropriate and most beneficial from the standpoint of the City as a whole; [t]o preserve natural beauty of the City; [and] [t]o ensure that uses and structures enhance their sites and harmonize with improvements in the surrounding area.” (b) The proposed conditional use will [not] adversely affect existing or anticipated uses in the immediate neighborhood, or will [not] adversely affect surrounding properties or the occupants thereof. The Project meets this finding. The Saratoga Country Club includes a nine-hole golf course, a 18,982 square foot clubhouse which includes a restaurant and banquet facilities, driving range, cart barn, both a tennis and golf pro shop, a swimming pool, and six tennis courts of which three are illuminated. All the uses were lawfully constructed. There is no evidence that illuminating three additional tennis courts would adversely affect existing or anticipated uses in the immediate neighborhood or surrounding properties or the occupants thereof. (c) The proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Saratoga City Code. The Project meets the required findings for Use Permit establishing the parameters for the Saratoga Country Club to operate as a Community Facility as well as the request by the Saratoga Country Club to illuminate three additional tennis courts. The project has been conditioned to comply with all applicable City regulations including, but not limited to the requirements of the Saratoga Building and Zoning Regulations. (d) The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Project meets the required findings for Use Permit establishing the parameters for the Saratoga Country Club to illuminate three additional tennis courts. An Environmental Assessment/Negative Declaration for the project was prepared and it was determined that the project would not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The project has also been conditioned to comply with all applicable regulations of the State, County, City and/or other Page 5 of 6 65 Page 6 of 6 governmental agencies having jurisdiction. The Saratoga Country Club has been in operation since 1958 and the City has received no complaints and there is no evidence of detriment to public health, safety or welfare from such uses or material injury to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Community Development Department completed an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code sections 21000-21177), CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations sections 15000-15387), and any other applicable requirements. The intent to adopt the Negative Declaration (ND) were duly noticed and circulated for a 20-day public review period from 21 November 2012 – 11 December 2012. All Interested Parties desiring to comment on the ND were given the opportunity to submit written and oral comments on the adequacy of the ND up to and including the close of the Public Hearing on the Project before the Planning Commission on December 12, 2012. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommend’s the Planning Commission adopt the proposed Negative Declaration and approve the application for a modification to the existing Conditional Use Permit by adopting the attached resolution. Staff is not recommending any permanent conditions of approval for this project. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution adopting a Negative Declaration and approving the Conditional Use Permit for the Saratoga Country Club. 2. Initial Study and Negative Declaration. 3. Public Hearing Notice 4. Applicants written project description. 5. Copies of the previous Use Permits for the Saratoga Country Club. 6. Photographs of the tennis courts and lights (submitted by the applicant). 7. Photometric Plan for the tennis court lights (submitted by the applicant). 8. Neighboring properties and distances exhibit (submitted by the applicant) 9. Technical Information from the lighting manufacturer (submitted by the applicant). 10. Partial Site Plan (Exhibit “A”) 66 RESOLUTION NO. 12-050 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP 12-0007) FOR THE SARATOGA COUNTRY CLUB LOCATED AT 21990 PROPSECT ROAD WHEREAS, on October 3, 2012, an application was submitted by the Saratoga Country Club requesting modification of their existing Use Permit to install exterior lights on three tennis courts. The site is located within the Hillside Residential Zoning District (APN 366-29-007). WHEREAS, the Community Development Department completed an Initial Study and Negative Declaration pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the Negative Declaration for the project. WHEREAS, on December 12, 2012, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application, and considered evidence presented by City Staff, the applicant, and other interested parties. NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows: Section 1: The recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: The Community Development Department completed an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code sections 21000-21177), CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations sections 15000-15387), and any other applicable requirements. The intent to adopt the Negative Declaration (ND) were duly noticed and circulated for a 20-day public review period from 21 November 2012 – 11 December 2012. All Interested Parties desiring to comment on the ND were given the opportunity to submit written and oral comments on the adequacy of the ND up to and including the close of the Public Hearing on Project before the Planning Commission on December 12, 2012. Section 3: The project is consistent with the following Saratoga General Plan Policies: Land Use Element Policy 10.1 which minimizes the impact of development proposals in hillside areas by requiring visual analyses and imposition of conditions to prevent or reduce significant visual impacts; Open Space Conservation Element Goal 3.0 which is to provide and maintain parks and a variety of passive and recreational sites which are located, designed, and improved to serve the needs of residents, the community, and the neighborhoods of Saratoga; Open Space Conservation Element Policy 3.3 which provides that the City shall promote retention and dedication of land which provides room for a variety of passive and active recreational pursuits and offers opportunities for the fulfillment of human and psychological needs; and Open Space Conservation Element Goal 6.0 which provides that the City shall protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. 67 Resolution No. 12-050 Section 4: The project is consistent with the Saratoga City Code in that the improvements are consistent with the Conditional Use Permit findings in that the project is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; will not adversely affect existing or anticipated uses in the immediate neighborhood, or will not adversely affect surrounding properties or the occupants thereof; will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Saratoga City Code; and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Section 5: The City of Saratoga Planning Commission hereby adopts the Negative Declaration and approves CUP 12-0007 for a Community Facility with lighted tennis courts located at 21990 Prospect Road and as described in the staff report, subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit 1. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on this 12th day of December 2012 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ____________________________ Tina K. Walia Chair, Planning Commission 68 Resolution No. 12-050 Exhibit 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CUP12-0007 SARATOGA COUNTRY CLUB 21990 PROSPECT ROAD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A. GENERAL 1. All conditions below which are identified as permanent or for which an alternative period of time for applicability is specified shall run with the land and apply to the landowner’s successors in interest for such time period. No zoning clearance, or demolition, grading, or building permit for this project shall be issued until proof is filed with the city that a certificate of approval documenting all applicable permanent or other term-specified conditions has been recorded by the applicant with the Santa Clara County Recorder’s Office in form and content acceptable to the community development director. 2. If a condition is not “permanent” or does not have a term specified, it shall remain in effect until the issuance by the City of Saratoga of a certificate of occupancy or its equivalent. 3. Conditions may be modified only by the Planning Commission unless modification is expressly otherwise allowed by the city code including but not limited to sections 15-80.120 and/or 16- 05.035, as applicable. 4. The Planning Commission shall retain continuing jurisdiction over the Conditional Use Permit and may, at any time, modify, delete, or impose, any new conditions of the permit to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare. 5. Any intensification of the uses approved under this Use Permit shall require an amended Conditional Use Permit. Examples of intensification of use include, but are not limited to, physical changes to the site or structures that result in ongoing increases in traffic, noise, or other physical effects. 6. The Community Development Director shall mail to the Owner and Applicant a notice in writing, on or after the time the Resolution granting this Approval is duly executed by the City, containing a statement of all amounts due to the City in connection with this application, including all consultant fees (collectively “processing fees”). This approval or permit shall expire sixty (60) days after the date said notice is mailed if all processing fees contained in the notice have not been paid in full. No Zoning Clearance or Demolition, Grading, or Building Permit may be issued until the Community Development Director certifies that all processing fees have been paid in full (and, for deposit accounts, a surplus balance of $500 is maintained). 7. The uses/structures/project shall maintain compliance with all applicable requirements of the City, including, without limitation, the requirements of the Saratoga Zoning Regulations. The uses/structures/project shall at all times operate in compliance with all applicable regulations 69 Resolution No. 12-050 of the State, County, and/or other governmental agencies having jurisdictional authority over the use pertaining to, but not limited to, health, sanitation, safety, and water quality issues. 8. Agreement to Indemnify, Hold Harmless and Defend City as to Action Challenging Approval of Application and as to Damage from Performance of Work Authorized by Design Review Approval. As a condition of this Approval, Owner and Applicant hereby agree to defend, indemnify and hold the City and its officers, officials, boards, commissions, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from and against: a. any and all claims, actions or proceedings to attack, set aside, void or annul any action on the subject application, or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done or made prior to said action; and b. any and all claims, demands, actions, expenses or liabilities arising from or in any manner relating to the performance of such construction, installation, alteration or grading work by the Owner and/or Applicant, their successors, or by any person acting on their behalf. In addition, the Owner and Applicant shall execute a separate agreement containing the details of this required Agreement to Indemnify, Hold Harmless and Defend, which shall be subject to prior approval as to form and content by the Community Development Director. B. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9. Use Permit: This Use Permit shall supersede all previously approved Use Permits. 10. Operation as a Community Facility: The Saratoga Country Club is defined as a Community Facility and shall operate with the following limitations. • The Saratoga Country Club may have daily hours of operation between dusk – 10: 00 P.M. • All tennis court lights shall be on a timer and are to be shut off no later than 10:00 P.M. • All events using amplified noise are subject to Article 7-30 of the City Code. 12. Planning Commission: The Planning Commission shall retain continuing jurisdiction of the Use Permit and may, at any time, modify, delete, or impose new conditions of the permit to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare. 70 Environmental Initial Study & Negative Declaration CUP12-0007, ENV12-0002 Conditional Use Permit Modification to Illuminate Three Tennis Courts at the Saratoga Country Club Owner: SARATOGA COUNTRY CLUB Public Review Period: November 20, 2012 to December 10, 2012 71 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club 1. Project title: MOD12-0007; ENV12-0002 Illumination of Three Existing Tennis Courts at the Saratoga Country Club. Initial Study and Negative Declaration 2. Lead agency name and address: City of Saratoga; Planning Division 13777 Fruitvale Avenue; Saratoga, CA 95070 3. Contact person and phone number: Christopher A. Riordan, AICP (408) 868-1235 4. Project location/APN: 21990 Prospect Road; Saratoga, CA 95070 / 517-18-048 5. Project sponsor name and address: Saratoga Country Club 21990 Prospect Road, Saratoga, CA 95070 6. General plan designation: Residential Hillside Conservation (RHC) 7. Zoning: HR (Hillside Residential) 8. Description of project: The Saratoga Country Club includes a nine-hole golf course, driving range, six tennis courts, and a clubhouse with a swimming pool. The tennis courts are adjacent to an existing parking lot located to the southeast of the clubhouse. Three of the tennis courts are currently illuminated by a total of 20 lights mounted atop 22’ tall poles (10 poles with one light and five poles with two lights on opposite sides). The applicant is proposing to install additional lights to illuminate the remaining three tennis courts which would include 24 lights mounted atop poles (eight poles with one light and eight poles with two lights on opposite sides) that would match the existing lights in style and height. The lights would only be operational at night and would be on a timer so they would go off no later than 10:00 p.m. No other changes to the tennis courts are proposed. 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: The project is located at 21990 Prospect Road in Saratoga, California. The property is zoned Hillside Residential (HR). Surrounding land uses include single-family homes to the north and southeast that is also zoned HR, Garrod Farms to the south and southwest which has Agricultural Preserve Overlay (AP) zoning, and Mid-Peninsula Regional Open Space District lands to the east which are zoned Residential Open Space (R-OS). 10. Other public agencies whose review is required Mid-Peninsula Regional Open Space District Page 2 72 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club : Figure 1: Project Location Page 3 73 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project. Please see the checklist beginning on page 7 for additional information. Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities/Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required Signature: Date: Nov. 19, 2012 Printed Name: Christopher Riordan Page 4 74 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiring, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. Page 5 75 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club I. AESTHETICS: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? DISCUSSION: a-c) The project is limited to the installation of 16 tennis court light poles that are 22 feet tall. The lights would be installed on three existing tennis courts. The color of the light poles and the light boxes located atop the poles would be painted black in color. Located adjacent to the project site are an additional three tennis courts with preexisting illumination. An existing 10 foot tall black colored wire fence surrounds the tennis courts. There is no scenic vista or scenic resources in the vicinity that could be impacted by the project. d) This environmental document covers the impacts of the 16 proposed tennis court lights that would be installed on three existing tennis courts at the Saratoga Country Club. The project applicant has submitted a lighting plan that indicates that no light will spill beyond the edges of the tennis courts. The lights would be directed down toward the surface of the tennis courts and light shields would be added to each light to further shield the lights as viewed from off site. Given that the light will not spill beyond the edges of the tennis courts, and that light shields would be used to shield the light source as viewed from offsite, the project would have less than a significant impact on light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Aesthetics (Sources: Review of the project, City of Saratoga General Plan and Municipal Code §15-13) Page 6 76 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and the forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? DISCUSSION: a-e) The property is not zoned for farm or agricultural land uses and it is not under a Williamson Act contract. No forest land, as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g) exists on the property. No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Agricultural and Forest Resources. (Sources: Review of the project, City of Saratoga General Plan and Municipal Code §15-13) III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Page 7 77 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club DISCUSSION: a-e) No heavy equipment will be used to construct the project which could potentially effect air quality or create objectionable odors. The tennis courts already exist so there will be no net increase in the number of vehicle trips to the site. No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Air Quality IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? DISCUSSION: a-f) The project site is developed with existing asphalt tennis courts and a parking lot. The proposed light poles would be mounted to the surface of the tennis courts. The 22’ tall tennis court lights have been designed to not spill light nor illuminate any areas beyond the immediate vicinity of the tennis courts. There are no wetlands in the areas and since the tennis courts exist there would not be the opportunity for the project to affect any known special status species. No trees are proposed for removal. There is no known Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan in effect for the project area and no conflict with such a plan is anticipated. No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Biological Resources. Page 8 78 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? DISCUSSION: a-d) The tennis court lights would be installed onto the surface of an existing asphalt tennis court. The areas in the vicinity of the courts have been developed. There are no known historical resources, archeological resources, paleontological, unique geological features, or human remains on the property. No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Cultural Resources. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42? ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Page 9 79 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? DISCUSSION: a-e) The project is limited to the installation of 16 tennis court light poles onto three existing tennis courts and would not include the construction of any structures that could expose people to the adverse effects of an earthquake. The applicant will be required to first obtain a building permit from the Saratoga Building Department prior to installing the poles which will ensure that the poles would meet the City’s structural standards. The poles would be installed onto an existing asphalt surface so there would be no effect on erosion or adjacent soils that may be expansive or unstable. No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on geology and soils. VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: An assessment of the greenhouse gas emissions and climate change is included in the body of environmental document. While Caltrans has included this good faith effort in order to provide the public and decision-makers as much information as possible about the project, it is Caltrans determination that in the absence of further regulatory or scientific information related to GHG emissions and CEQA significance, it is too speculative to make a significance determination regarding the project’s direct and indirect impact with respect to climate change. Caltrans does remain firmly committed to implementing measures to help reduce the potential effects of the project. These measures are outlined in the body of the environmental document. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? DISCUSSION: a-b) The project includes the installation of 16 light poles onto the surface of three existing tennis courts. Neither the installation nor the operation of the tennis court lights would be a source of greenhouse gas emissions to conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gasses. No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Page 10 80 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? DISCUSSION: a-h) The site is not included on any list of hazardous material sites. The site is not located within two miles of a public airport, nor is there a relevant airport land use plan. There are no known private airstrips in the vicinity. The project will not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, nor expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to hazards and hazardous materials. Page 11 81 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow DISCUSSION: a-j) The project would have no increase on the amount of existing impervious area that could increase the amount of water runoff. The project would have no affect on groundwater supplies, would not alter the existing drainage pattern of the site, or create new surface runoff nor degrade water quality. The project would be limited to tennis court light pole installation and would not expose housing or people to flooding hazards, inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Hydrology and Water Quality Resources. Page 12 82 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club X. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Physically divide an established community? b)Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? DISCUSSION: a) The project would include the installation of 16 tennis court light poles onto the surface of existing tennis courts. The project would not physically divide an established community or conflict with any known habitat conservation or natural community plans of the City of Saratoga. b) The Saratoga Country Club is referred to as a Community Facility within the City Code. A Community Facility is defined as “……. a facility used for and providing fraternal, social or recreational programs or activities generally open to the public”. This definition includes swimming pools, recreational courts and golf courses. Within the Hillside Residential Zoning District a Community Facility is a Conditional Use requiring a use permit. Three of the six tennis courts at the Saratoga Country Club are illuminated with exterior lights. On August 18, 1977 the Planning Commission approved a modification of the Clubs Conditional Use Permit to allow illumination of three tennis courts with the condition that the lights have an automatic timer which will shut off by 10:00 p.m. The Saratoga Country Club is currently operating under Conditional Use Permit #98-014 which was approved by the Planning Commission in November 1998 when the Club received approval to expand size of the existing clubhouse. The project applicant has applied for a modification to their Conditional Use Permit for the installation of additional lighting to illuminate the three remaining tennis courts. The City Code includes special regulations for recreational courts. City Code Section 15-80.030(c)(2) states that recreational courts are not to be illuminated by exterior lighting. The existing tennis court lights were approved by the Planning Commission in August 1977 so therefore the existing lights can be considered to be a legal nonconforming use. City Code Section 15-65.100(b) would allow the Planning Commission to approve an expansion of a nonconforming use to illuminate the remaining three courts that are not illuminated upon finding that such expansion and/or intensification will not adversely affect existing or anticipated uses in the immediate neighborhood. The Planning Commission will review the tennis court lights and any possible adverse effect on the immediate neighborhood during a future public hearing. c) There is no known applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan in the vicinity of the project. No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Land Use and Planning. Page 13 83 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club (Sources: Review of the project, Saratoga Municipal Code, Saratoga General Plan Land Use Element) XI. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? DISCUSSION: a-b) The property is not categorized or referenced within the General Plan as having mineral deposits of value to the region and has not been recognized as being a locally important mineral resource recovery site. No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Mineral Resources. (Sources: Review of the project, Saratoga General Plan Open Space Element) XII. NOISE: Would the project result in: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Page 14 84 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club DISCUSSION: a-d) The proposed tennis court lights would be powered by the existing electrical grid. No noise or vibration would be associated with the operation of the lights. e-f) The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport or public use airport or within the vicinity of a private airstrip. No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to Noise impacts. (Sources: Saratoga General Plan Noise Element) XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? DISCUSSION: a-c) The project is limited to the construction of 16 tennis court light poles. The project does not include home construction. No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Population and Housing. (Sources: Review of the project, Saratoga General Plan Housing Element) XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Police protection? Page 15 85 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? DISCUSSION: a) The project is limited to the construction of 16 tennis court light poles on three existing tennis courts. The project would have no effect on public safety, school, parks, or other public facilities. Based on the above discussion, No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Public Services. (Sources: Review of the project, Saratoga General Plan. Saratoga Municipal Code) XV. RECREATION: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? DISCUSSION: a-b) The project would have no effect on the use of existing neighborhood, regional or other recreational facilities, nor does the project require construction or expansion of recreational facilities. No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to impacts on Recreation. (Source: Review of the project, Saratoga General Plan Open Space Element) XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Page 16 86 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? DISCUSSION: a-f) The project is limited to the construction of 16 tennis court light poles on three existing tennis courts. The project will not conflict with any City plan, ordinance, or policy or applicable congestion management program. The proposed project would not result in a change in traffic patterns, substantially increase hazards due to a design feature, or result in inadequate emergency access. The proposed project will not conflict with any adopted policies or plans supporting alternative transportation. No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to transportation and traffic. XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Page 17 87 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club DISCUSSION: a-g) The project is limited to the construction of 16 tennis court light poles on three existing tennis courts. The project would have no effect utilities and service systems. No mitigation is necessary or required in relation to Utilities and Service Systems. XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? DISCUSSION: a-c) This environmental document covers the impacts of the 16 proposed tennis court light polwa that would be installed on three existing tennis courts at the Saratoga Country Club. The project applicant has submitted a lighting plan that shows that no light will spill beyond the edges of the tennis courts. The lights would be directed down toward the surface of the tennis courts and light shields would be added to each light to further shield the lights as viewed from off site. The project would have no effect on any animal habitat nor would it threaten any rare or endangered species. The project would not have cumulative impacts as the project is limited to three existing tennis courts and no additional lighting is proposed or anticipated. Given that the light will not spill beyond the edges of the tennis courts and that light shields would be used to shield the light source as viewed from offsite the project would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. GENERAL SOURCE REFERENCES: 1. City of Saratoga General Plan (Land Use, Circulation, Open Space & Conservation, Noise, and Safety Element) 2. City of Saratoga Zoning Ordinance and Map 3. Planners knowledge of the project. PROJECT RELATED SOURCES/REFERENCES: Page 18 88 City of Saratoga Environmental Initial Study and Negative Declaration 21990 Prospect Road – Saratoga Country Club Page 19 4. Lighting Plan 5. Tennis Court Site Plan 6. Site Plan of the Saratoga Country Club 89 CITY OF SARATOGA Community Development Department 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, CA 95070 (408) 868-1222 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The City of Saratoga’s Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Theater located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. A site visit will also be held by the Planning Commission at the subject property. Please contact the Planning Department for the date and time of the site visit. The public hearing agenda item is stated below. Details of this item are available at the Saratoga Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Please consult the City website at www.saratoga.ca.us regarding Friday office closures. APPLICATION: CUP12-007 / ENV12-0002 OWNER/APPLICANT: Saratoga Country Club ADDRESS/APN: 21990 Prospect Road; Saratoga, CA 95070 / 517-18-048 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Saratoga Country Club includes a nine-hole golf course, driving range, six tennis courts, and a clubhouse with a swimming pool. The tennis courts are adjacent to an existing parking lot located to the southeast of the clubhouse. Three of the tennis courts are currently illuminated by a total of 20 lights mounted atop 22’ tall poles (10 poles with one light and five poles with two lights on opposite sides). The applicant is proposing to install additional lights to illuminate the remaining three tennis courts which would include 24 lights mounted atop poles (eight poles with one light and eight poles with two lights on opposite sides) that would match the existing lights in style and height. The lights would only be operational at night and would be on a timer so they would go off no later than 10:00 p.m. No other changes to the tennis courts are proposed. The project is subject of a Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act which is available for review by the public until December 11, 2012. All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a decision of the Planning Commission, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing. This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor’s office annually, in preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out-of-date information or difficulties with the U.S. Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all residents potentially affected by a project. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project. Christopher Riordan (408) 868-1235 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Date: December 12, 2012 Application: Design Review PDR12-0018 Location / APN: 1777 Saratoga Avenue / 386-10-049 Owner/Applicant: Sprint / Kato Brothers Staff Planner: Cynthia McCormick, Planner, AICP 1777 Saratoga Avenue Page 1 of 3 125 Summary PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Design Review approval to replace three existing antennas and add six new remote radio units on an existing telecommunications monopole. The project also includes the replacement of two equipment cabinets in an existing ground level enclosure. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 12-052 approving the project subject to conditions of approval. PROJECT DATA: General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential Zoning: Professional Administrative PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS Design Review approval is required pursuant to City Code Article 15-44. Site Description: The site is located near the periphery of the City in a small triangle located between Lawrence Expressway, Saratoga Avenue, and Prospect Road. The property is currently occupied by a 66 foot tall monopole and microwave antenna that extends the monopole to a height of 70 feet. The existing monopole includes several antenna installations from various service providers. A six foot tall fence surrounds the ground level equipment cabinets, partially screening them from view. Project Description: The project will replace three (3) existing antennas and add six (6) new remote radio units over 3 sectors, on the existing lattice tower. The project also includes the replacement of two (2) equipment cabinets in an existing enclosure. The replacement antennas are proposed to increase “4G” capacity, not coverage area. The applicant indicates that the improvements are needed to allow the site to handle the increased level of simultaneous data and voice transmissions in the existing coverage area. Radio Frequency (RF) Analysis: The applicant has provided a Radio Frequency (RF) Analysis which concludes that the proposed telecommunications facility will comply with the FCC’s current prevailing standard for limiting human exposure to RF energy, and no significant impact on the general public is expected. Neighbor Notification and Correspondence: The applicant notified adjacent property owners about the project. Notice was also sent to property owners within 500 feet of the site. No comments have been received by staff as of the writing of this staff report. Application No. PDR 12-0018; 1777 Saratoga Avenue / 386-10-049 Page 2 of 3 126 Application No. PDR 12-0018; 1777 Saratoga Avenue / 386-10-049 Page 3 of 3 FINDINGS Design Review Findings: The findings required for issuance of a Design Review approval pursuant to City Code Article 15- 44.025 are set forth below and the Applicant has met the burden of proof to support making all of those required findings: (a) That the wireless telecommunications facility is or can be co-located with another wireless telecommunications facility located on a structure or an existing utility pole/tower in the public right of way unless the applicant has demonstrated that such location is not technically or operationally feasible. This finding can be made in the affirmative because the wireless telecommunication facility will be co-located with other service providers on an existing monopole. (b) That the wireless telecommunication facility and related structures incorporate architectural treatments and screening to substantially include (1) appropriate and innovative stealth design solutions; (2) techniques to blend with the surrounding environment and predominant background; (3) colors and materials that are non-reflective; (4) exterior textures to match the existing support structure or building; and (5) reasonably compatible height with the existing surrounding environment. This finding can be made in the affirmative. The wireless telecommunication facility will be co-located with other service providers, thus eliminating the need for a new separate facility and reducing the visual impact on surrounding properties. The existing monopole will not increase in height. The proposed antennas are similar in design to existing antennas. The colors and materials of the proposed communication facility have a non-reflective finish to match the existing monopole. The proposed equipment will be placed in a cabinet on the ground in an existing fenced area screened by landscaping. (c) That landscaping and fencing provide visual screening of the wireless communication facility’s ground mounted equipment, related structures, and that fencing material is compatible with the image and aesthetics of the surrounding area. This finding can be made in the affirmative. The proposed equipment will be placed in a cabinet on the ground in an existing fenced area screened by landscaping. The owner is responsible for the maintenance of existing landscaping. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 12-052 approving the project, subject to conditions of approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution of Approval for Design Review 2. Public Hearing Notice 3. Radio-Frequency Report 4. Photo Simulations 5. Coverage Maps 6. Development Plans (Exhibit "A") 127 Attachment 1  RESOLUTION NO. 12-052 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING APPLICATION NO. PDR 12-0018 FOR A CO-LOCATED WIRELESS INSTALLATION LOCATED AT 1777 SARATOGA AVENUE / 386-10-049 WHEREAS, an application was submitted by Sprint, requesting Design Review approval for a co-located wireless installation. The project includes the replacement of three (3) existing antennas and add six (6) new remote radio units, over 3 sectors. The project also includes the replacement of two (2) equipment cabinets in an existing enclosure. No trees will be removed. The property is located within the Professional Administrative Zoning District. WHEREAS, on December 12, 2012, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application, and considered evidence presented by City staff, the applicant, and other interested parties. NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows: Section 1: The recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: The Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. Section 15303). Class 3 exemptions include installation of equipment and facilities, such as wireless facilities. Section 3: The project is consistent with the Saratoga General Plan Land Use Policy LU 13.1 by utilizing the design review process to review non-residential projects to promote high quality design, to ensure compliance with applicable regulations, to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties and use, and to minimize environmental impacts. Section 4: The project is consistent with the Saratoga City Code in that the wireless telecommunication facility will be co-located with other service providers, thus eliminating the need for a new separate facility and reducing the visual impact on surrounding properties. The existing monopole will not increase in height and the proposed antennas are situated below existing antennas. The antennas are proposed with a similar layout and design to existing antennas, thus minimizing bulk that might be perceived with a larger design. The colors and materials of the proposed communication facility have a non-reflective finish to match the existing monopole. Section 5: The City of Saratoga Planning Commission hereby approves Application No. PDR12-0018 subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 128 Resolution No. 12‐052  Page 2    PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission this 12th day of December 2012 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ___________________________________ Tina K. Walia Chair, Planning Commission 129 Resolution No. 12‐052  Page 3    EXHIBIT 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PDR 12-0018 / 1777 SARATOGA AVENUE / 386-10-049 1. All conditions below which are identified as permanent or for which an alternative period of time for applicability is specified shall run with the land and apply to the landowner’s successors in interest for such time period. No zoning clearance, or demolition, grading for this project shall be issued until proof is filed with the city that a certificate of approval documenting all applicable permanent or other term-specified conditions has been recorded by the applicant with the Santa Clara County Recorder’s office in form and content to the Community Development Director. If a condition is not “Permanent” or does not have a term specified, it shall remain in effect until the issuance by the City of Saratoga of a Certificate of Occupancy or its equivalent. 2. The Owner and Applicant will be mailed a statement after the time the Resolution granting this approval is duly executed, containing a statement of all amounts due to the City in connection with this application, including all consultant fees (collectively “processing fees”), if applicable. This approval or permit shall expire sixty (60) days after the date said notice is mailed if all processing fees contained in the notice have not been paid in full. No Zoning Clearance or Demolition, Grading, or Building Permit may be issued until the City certifies that all processing fees have been paid in full (and, for deposit accounts, a surplus balance of $500 is maintained). 3. The Project shall maintain compliance with all applicable regulations of the State, County, City and/or other governmental agencies having jurisdiction including, without limitation, the requirements of the Saratoga City Code incorporated herein by this reference. 4. As a condition of this Approval, Owner and Applicant hereby agree to defend, indemnify and hold the City and its officers, officials, boards, commissions, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from and against: a. any and all claims, actions or proceedings to attack, set aside, void or annul any action on the subject application, or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done or made prior to said action; and b. any and all claims, demands, actions, expenses or liabilities arising from or in any manner relating to the performance of such construction, installation, alteration or grading work by the Owner and/or Applicant, their successors, or by any person acting on their behalf. In addition, prior to any Zoning Clearance, Owner and Applicant shall execute a separate agreement containing the details of this required Agreement to Indemnify, Hold harmless and Defend, which shall be subject to prior approval as to form and content by the City Attorney. 130 Resolution No. 12‐052  Page 4    COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 5. Compliance with Plans. The development shall be located and constructed to include those features, and only those features, as shown on the Approved Plans denominated Exhibit "A". All proposed changes to the Approved Plans must be submitted in writing with plans showing the changes, including a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. Such changes shall be subject to approval in accordance with City Code. 6. Building Division Submittal. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans shall be submitted to the Building Division. These plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance. The construction plans shall, at a minimum include the following: a. Architectural drawings and other plan sheets consistent with those identified as Exhibit “A” on file with the Community Development Department; b. All additional drawings, plans, maps, reports, notes, and/or materials required by the Building Division. c. This signed and dated Resolution printed onto a separate construction plan page(s); d. The site plan shall contain a note with the following language: “Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the Licensed Land Surveyor of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks comply with the Approved Plans,” which note shall represent a condition which must be satisfied to remain in compliance with this Design Review Approval; 7. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Verification. The owner and/or Applicant shall include a note on the plans, verifying compliance with the FCC prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for the project. 8. Radio Frequency Testing. Radio Frequency levels shall be tested approximately 12 months from the date of final building permit approval. The results of this test shall be submitted to the Community Development Department and be available for review by the FCC. 131 RF EMISSIONS COMPLIANCE REPORT Crown Castle on behalf of Sprint-Nextel Site: Westgate (Revised) 816226 Application #: 132847 1777 Saratogo Avenue Saratoga, CA 3/29/2012 Report Status: Sprint-Nextel Is Under 5% Threshold Prepared By: Sitesafe, Inc. 200 North Glebe Road, Suite 1000 Arlington, VA 22203 Voice 703-276-1100 Fax 703-276-1169 132 1 of 41 Engineering Statement in Re: Electromagnetic Energy Analysis Sprint-Nextel Saratoga, CA My signature on the cover of this document indicates: That I am registered as a Professional Engineer in the jurisdiction indicated; and That I have extensive professional experience in the wireless communications engineering industry; and That I am an employee of Sitesafe, Inc. in Arlington, Virginia; and That I am thoroughly familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission ("the FCC” and “the FCC Rules") both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCC's Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields; and That the technical information serving as the basis for this report was supplied by Sprint-Nextel (See attached Site Summary and Carrier documents), and that Sprint-Nextel’s installations involve communications equipment, antennas and associated technical equipment at a location referred to as the “Westgate (Revised) 816226” (“the site”); and That Sprint-Nextel proposes to operate at the site with transmit antennas listed in the carrier summary and with a maximum effective radiated power as specified by Sprint-Nextel and shown on the worksheet, and that worst-case 100% duty cycle have been assumed; and That in addition to the emitters specified in the worksheet, there are additional collocated point- to-point microwave facilities on this structure and, the antennas used are highly directional oriented at angles at or just below the horizontal and, that the energy present at ground level is typically so low as to be considered insignificant and have not been included in this analysis; and That this analysis has been performed with the assumption that the ground immediately surrounding the tower is primarily flat or falling; and That at this time, the FCC requires that certain licensees address specific levels of radio- frequency energy to which workers or members of the public might possibly be exposed (at §1.1307(b) of the FCC Rules); and That such consideration of possible exposure of humans to radio-frequency radiation must utilize the standards set by the FCC, which is the Federal Agency having jurisdiction over communications facilities; and That the FCC rules define two tiers of permissible exposure guidelines: 1) "uncontrolled environments," defined as situations in which persons may not be aware of (the “general public”), or may not be able to control their exposure to a transmission facility; and (2) “controlled environments,” which defines situations in which persons are aware of their potential for exposure (industry personnel); and That this statement specifically addresses the uncontrolled environment (which is more conservative than the controlled environment) and the limit set forth in the FCC rules for 133 2 of 41 licensees of Sprint-Nextel’s operating frequency as shown on the attached antenna worksheet; and That when applying the uncontrolled environment standards, the predicted Maximum Power Density at two meters above ground level from the proposed Sprint-Nextel operation is no more than 0.596% of the maximum in any accessible area on the ground and That it is understood per FCC Guidelines and OET65 Appendix A, that regardless of the existent radio-frequency environment, only those licenses whose contributions exceed five percent of the exposure limit pertinent to their operation(s) bear any responsibility for bringing any non- compliant area(s) into compliance; and That when applying the uncontrolled environment standards, the cumulative predicted energy density from the proposed operation is no more than 11.215% of the maximum in any accessible area up to two meters above the ground per OET-65; and That the calculations provided in this report are based on data provided by the client and antenna pattern data supplied by the antenna manufacturer, in accordance with FCC guidelines listed in OET-65. Horizontal and vertical antenna patterns are combined for modeling purposes to accurately reflect the energy two meters above ground level where on-axis energy refers to maximum energy two meters above the ground along the azimuth of the antenna and where area energy refers to the maximum energy anywhere two meters above the ground regardless of the antenna azimuth, accounting for cumulative energy from multiple antennas for the carrier and frequency range indicated; and That the Occupational Safety and Health Administration has policies in place which address worker safety in and around communications sites, thus individual companies will be responsible for their employees’ training regarding Radio Frequency Safety. In summary, it is stated here that the proposed operation at the site would not result in exposure of the Public to excessive levels of radio-frequency energy as defined in the FCC Rules and Regulations, specifically 47 CFR 1.1307 and that Sprint-Nextel’s proposed operation is completely compliant. Finally, it is stated that access to the tower should be restricted to communication industry professionals, and approved contractor personnel trained in radio-frequency safety; and that the instant analysis addresses exposure levels at two meters above ground level and does not address exposure levels on the tower, or in the immediate proximity of the antennas. 134 3 of 41 Sprint-Nextel Westgate (Revised) 816226 Site Summary Carrier Area Maximum Percentage MPE AT&T Mobility LLC 1.178 % AT&T Mobility LLC 3.594 % AT&T Mobility LLC 2.013 % Clearwire 0.231 % Sprint-Nextel (Proposed) 0.596 % Verizon Wireless 1.216 % Verizon Wireless 1.204 % Verizon Wireless 1.184 % Composite Site MPE: 11.215 % 135 4 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 Carrier Summary Frequency: 1900 MHz Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 µW/cm^2 Maximum power density at ground level: 11.78015 µW/cm^2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 1.17802 % On Axis Area Antenna Make Model Height (feet) Orientation (degrees true) ERP (Watts) Max Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Max Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Kathrein-Scala 742264 49 20 1000 2.630856 0.263086 4.603061 0.460306 Kathrein-Scala 742264 49 140 1000 2.646617 0.264662 4.603061 0.460306 Kathrein-Scala 742264 49 240 1000 2.630856 0.263086 4.603061 0.460306 ANDREW TBXLHB-6565A-VTM 49 45 1000 2.510829 0.251083 5.179511 0.517951 ANDREW TBXLHB-6565A-VTM 49 140 1000 2.510829 0.251083 5.179511 0.517951 ANDREW TBXLHB-6565A-VTM 49 260 1000 2.512841 0.251284 5.179511 0.517951 136 5 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 Carrier Summary Frequency: 850 MHz Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 566.67 µW/cm^2 Maximum power density at ground level: 20.36411 µW/cm^2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 3.59367 % On Axis Area Antenna Make Model Height (feet) Orientation (degrees true) ERP (Watts) Max Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Max Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Kathrein-Scala 742264 49 20 1000 8.189633 1.445229 10.753183 1.897621 Kathrein-Scala 742264 49 140 1000 8.189634 1.44523 10.753183 1.897621 Kathrein-Scala 742264 49 240 1000 8.252492 1.456322 10.753183 1.897621 ANDREW TBXLHB-6565A-VTM 49 45 1000 5.831414 1.029073 6.172359 1.08924 ANDREW TBXLHB-6565A-VTM 49 140 1000 5.831414 1.029073 6.172359 1.08924 ANDREW TBXLHB-6565A-VTM 49 260 1000 5.831414 1.029073 6.172358 1.08924 137 6 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 Carrier Summary Frequency: 737 MHz Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 491.33 µW/cm^2 Maximum power density at ground level: 9.89077 µW/cm^2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 2.01305 % On Axis Area Antenna Make Model Height (feet) Orientation (degrees true) ERP (Watts) Max Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Max Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE ANDREW DBXNH-6565A-VTM 43 45 1000 7.454764 1.517252 8.904161 1.812245 ANDREW DBXNH-6565A-VTM 43 140 1000 7.454764 1.517252 8.904161 1.812245 ANDREW DBXNH-6565A-VTM 43 250 1000 7.454767 1.517253 8.904158 1.812244 138 7 of 41 Clearwire Westgate (Revised) 816226 Carrier Summary Frequency: 2500 MHz Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 µW/cm^2 Maximum power density at ground level: 2.31389 µW/cm^2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 0.23139 % On Axis Area Antenna Make Model Height (feet) Orientation (degrees true) ERP (Watts) Max Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Max Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Kathrein-Scala 84010054 64 350 355 0.730061 0.073006 1.540628 0.154063 Kathrein-Scala 84010054 64 110 355 0.730061 0.073006 1.540628 0.154063 Kathrein-Scala 84010054 64 280 355 0.718798 0.07188 1.540628 0.154063 139 8 of 41 Sprint-Nextel Westgate (Revised) 816226 Carrier Summary Frequency: 1900 MHz Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 µW/cm^2 Maximum power density at ground level: 5.96429 µW/cm^2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 0.59643 % On Axis Area Antenna Make Model Height (feet) Orientation (degrees true) ERP (Watts) Max Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Max Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE KMW HB-X-AW-17-65-00T (PROPOSED) 64 345 1000 3.04344 0.304344 4.38933 0.438933 KMW HB-X-AW-17-65-00T (PROPOSED) 64 135 1000 3.04344 0.304344 4.389334 0.438933 KMW HB-X-AW-17-65-00T (PROPOSED) 64 225 1000 3.04344 0.304344 4.389334 0.438933 140 9 of 41 Verizon Wireless Westgate (Revised) 816226 Carrier Summary Frequency: 751 MHz Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 500.67 µW/cm^2 Maximum power density at ground level: 6.08628 µW/cm^2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 1.21564 % On Axis Area Antenna Make Model Height (feet) Orientation (degrees true) ERP (Watts) Max Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Max Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE ANDREW LNX-6512DS 58 40 1000 5.755593 1.149586 6.06224 1.210833 ANDREW LNX-6512DS 58 160 1000 5.751929 1.148854 6.06224 1.210833 ANDREW LNX-6512DS 58 280 1000 5.751927 1.148854 6.06224 1.210833 141 10 of 41 Verizon Wireless Westgate (Revised) 816226 Carrier Summary Frequency: 1900 MHz Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 µW/cm^2 Maximum power density at ground level: 12.03633 µW/cm^2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 1.20363 % On Axis Area Antenna Make Model Height (feet) Orientation (degrees true) ERP (Watts) Max Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Max Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE ANDREW 932DG65VTE 58 40 2000 8.285 0.8285 11.913956 1.191396 ANDREW 932DG65VTE 58 160 2000 8.285002 0.8285 11.913956 1.191396 ANDREW 932DG65VTE 58 280 2000 8.285002 0.8285 11.913951 1.191395 142 11 of 41 Verizon Wireless Westgate (Revised) 816226 Carrier Summary Frequency: 850 MHz Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 566.67 µW/cm^2 Maximum power density at ground level: 6.7071 µW/cm^2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 1.18361 % On Axis Area Antenna Make Model Height (feet) Orientation (degrees true) ERP (Watts) Max Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Max Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE ANDREW LBX-6513DS-VTM 58 40 2000 6.347669 1.120177 6.651642 1.173819 ANDREW LBX-6513DS-VTM 58 160 2000 6.347669 1.120177 6.651642 1.173819 ANDREW LBX-6513DS-VTM 58 280 2000 6.347668 1.120177 6.651641 1.173819 143 12 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 Kathrein-Scala:742264 Antenna Worksheet (20 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 49 Frequency (MHz): 1900 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 0.00 1.0000 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000033 3017551 1.0 0.00 1.0000 1003.07 1002.99 0.033141 0.003314 30174 2.0 -0.40 0.9120 501.51 501.34 0.132577 0.013258 7542 3.0 -1.30 0.7413 334.31 334.06 0.298354 0.029835 3351 4.0 -2.60 0.5495 250.70 250.37 0.530542 0.053054 1884 5.0 -4.40 0.3631 200.53 200.11 0.801650 0.080165 1247 6.0 -6.80 0.2089 167.07 166.57 0.963060 0.096306 1038 7.0 -10.00 0.1000 143.17 142.59 1.125063 0.112506 888 8.0 -14.50 0.0355 125.24 124.57 1.287762 0.128776 776 9.0 -21.60 0.0069 111.29 110.54 1.451261 0.145126 689 10.0 -45.50 0.0000 100.13 99.29 1.615667 0.161567 618 12.0 -21.70 0.0068 83.37 82.37 1.947635 0.194763 513 14.0 -20.60 0.0087 71.40 70.22 2.007926 0.200793 498 16.0 -22.00 0.0063 62.41 61.05 1.005647 0.100565 994 18.0 -23.10 0.0049 55.41 53.88 0.244784 0.024478 4085 20.0 -25.80 0.0026 49.81 48.10 0.157369 0.015737 6354 22.0 -27.90 0.0016 45.22 43.33 0.191224 0.019122 5229 24.0 -22.20 0.0060 41.39 39.32 0.226950 0.022695 4406 26.0 -20.10 0.0098 38.15 35.90 0.235566 0.023557 4245 28.0 -21.70 0.0068 35.38 32.93 0.317912 0.031791 3145 30.0 -27.70 0.0017 32.97 30.32 0.389688 0.038969 2566 32.0 -32.60 0.0005 30.86 28.02 0.443629 0.044363 2254 34.0 -24.00 0.0040 29.00 25.96 0.501047 0.050105 1995 36.0 -21.40 0.0072 27.35 24.10 0.558878 0.055888 1789 38.0 -23.10 0.0049 25.87 22.41 0.622139 0.062214 1607 40.0 -28.50 0.0014 24.55 20.86 0.657031 0.065703 1521 42.0 -22.80 0.0052 23.35 19.44 0.574564 0.057456 1740 44.0 -19.00 0.0126 22.27 18.13 0.629230 0.062923 1589 46.0 -18.30 0.0148 21.29 16.91 0.681863 0.068186 1466 48.0 -19.30 0.0117 20.39 15.76 1.028462 0.102846 972 50.0 -21.10 0.0078 19.57 14.69 1.542403 0.154240 648 52.0 -23.80 0.0042 18.83 13.68 1.689445 0.168945 591 54.0 -28.20 0.0015 18.14 12.72 1.807594 0.180759 553 56.0 -36.30 0.0002 17.51 11.81 1.926427 0.192643 519 58.0 -50.10 0.0000 16.94 10.94 2.036768 0.203677 490 60.0 -39.20 0.0001 16.42 10.11 1.976547 0.197655 505 62.0 -48.70 0.0000 15.94 9.31 1.450419 0.145042 689 64.0 -35.10 0.0003 15.50 8.54 0.828601 0.082860 1206 66.0 -27.20 0.0019 15.10 7.79 0.300092 0.030009 3332 68.0 -23.30 0.0047 14.74 7.07 0.237606 0.023761 4208 70.0 -20.80 0.0083 14.42 6.37 0.833761 0.083376 1199 72.0 -19.30 0.0117 14.13 5.69 1.670729 0.167073 598 74.0 -18.90 0.0129 13.88 5.02 2.396631 0.239663 417 76.0 -19.30 0.0117 13.65 4.37 2.529300 0.252930 395 78.0 -20.00 0.0100 13.46 3.72 2.591685 0.259168 385 80.0 -20.40 0.0091 13.30 3.09 2.630856 0.263086 380 82.0 -21.10 0.0078 13.17 2.46 2.622343 0.262234 381 84.0 -22.50 0.0056 13.07 1.84 2.247470 0.224747 444 86.0 -23.70 0.0043 12.99 1.22 1.969430 0.196943 507 88.0 -24.10 0.0039 12.95 0.61 1.595202 0.159520 626 90.0 -32.20 0.0006 12.94 0.00 1.039949 0.103995 961 144 13 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 Kathrein-Scala:742264 Antenna Worksheet (140 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 49 Frequency (MHz): 1900 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 0.00 1.0000 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000033 3017551 1.0 0.00 1.0000 1003.07 1002.99 0.033141 0.003314 30174 2.0 -0.40 0.9120 501.51 501.34 0.132577 0.013258 7542 3.0 -1.30 0.7413 334.31 334.06 0.298354 0.029835 3351 4.0 -2.60 0.5495 250.70 250.37 0.530542 0.053054 1884 5.0 -4.40 0.3631 200.53 200.11 0.801650 0.080165 1247 6.0 -6.80 0.2089 167.07 166.57 0.963060 0.096306 1038 7.0 -10.00 0.1000 143.17 142.59 1.125063 0.112506 888 8.0 -14.50 0.0355 125.24 124.57 1.287762 0.128776 776 9.0 -21.60 0.0069 111.29 110.54 1.451261 0.145126 689 10.0 -45.50 0.0000 100.13 99.29 1.615667 0.161567 618 12.0 -21.70 0.0068 83.37 82.37 1.947635 0.194763 513 14.0 -20.60 0.0087 71.40 70.22 2.007925 0.200792 498 16.0 -22.00 0.0063 62.41 61.05 1.005647 0.100565 994 18.0 -23.10 0.0049 55.41 53.88 0.244006 0.024401 4098 20.0 -25.80 0.0026 49.81 48.10 0.157781 0.015778 6337 22.0 -27.90 0.0016 45.22 43.33 0.191224 0.019122 5229 24.0 -22.20 0.0060 41.39 39.32 0.225857 0.022586 4427 26.0 -20.10 0.0098 38.15 35.90 0.234667 0.023467 4261 28.0 -21.70 0.0068 35.38 32.93 0.317912 0.031791 3145 30.0 -27.70 0.0017 32.97 30.32 0.387707 0.038771 2579 32.0 -32.60 0.0005 30.86 28.02 0.443629 0.044363 2254 34.0 -24.00 0.0040 29.00 25.96 0.498500 0.049850 2006 36.0 -21.40 0.0072 27.35 24.10 0.558878 0.055888 1789 38.0 -23.10 0.0049 25.87 22.41 0.622139 0.062214 1607 40.0 -28.50 0.0014 24.55 20.86 0.657031 0.065703 1521 42.0 -22.80 0.0052 23.35 19.44 0.574564 0.057456 1740 44.0 -19.00 0.0126 22.27 18.13 0.629230 0.062923 1589 46.0 -18.30 0.0148 21.29 16.91 0.685855 0.068585 1458 48.0 -19.30 0.0117 20.39 15.76 1.028462 0.102846 972 50.0 -21.10 0.0078 19.57 14.69 1.542403 0.154240 648 52.0 -23.80 0.0042 18.83 13.68 1.680855 0.168085 594 54.0 -28.20 0.0015 18.14 12.72 1.799507 0.179951 555 56.0 -36.30 0.0002 17.51 11.81 1.919076 0.191908 521 58.0 -50.10 0.0000 16.94 10.94 2.043990 0.204399 489 60.0 -39.20 0.0001 16.42 10.11 1.976547 0.197655 505 62.0 -48.70 0.0000 15.94 9.31 1.450419 0.145042 689 64.0 -35.10 0.0003 15.50 8.54 0.828601 0.082860 1206 66.0 -27.20 0.0019 15.10 7.79 0.300092 0.030009 3332 68.0 -23.30 0.0047 14.74 7.07 0.237303 0.023730 4214 70.0 -20.80 0.0083 14.42 6.37 0.832700 0.083270 1200 72.0 -19.30 0.0117 14.13 5.69 1.670729 0.167073 598 74.0 -18.90 0.0129 13.88 5.02 2.396631 0.239663 417 76.0 -19.30 0.0117 13.65 4.37 2.542227 0.254223 393 78.0 -20.00 0.0100 13.46 3.72 2.572108 0.257211 388 80.0 -20.40 0.0091 13.30 3.09 2.630856 0.263086 380 82.0 -21.10 0.0078 13.17 2.46 2.646617 0.264662 377 84.0 -22.50 0.0056 13.07 1.84 2.247470 0.224747 444 86.0 -23.70 0.0043 12.99 1.22 1.951941 0.195194 512 88.0 -24.10 0.0039 12.95 0.61 1.595202 0.159520 626 90.0 -32.20 0.0006 12.94 0.00 1.033086 0.103309 967 145 14 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 Kathrein-Scala:742264 Antenna Worksheet (240 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 49 Frequency (MHz): 1900 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 0.00 1.0000 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000033 3017551 1.0 0.00 1.0000 1003.07 1002.99 0.033141 0.003314 30174 2.0 -0.40 0.9120 501.51 501.34 0.132577 0.013258 7542 3.0 -1.30 0.7413 334.31 334.06 0.298354 0.029835 3351 4.0 -2.60 0.5495 250.70 250.37 0.530542 0.053054 1884 5.0 -4.40 0.3631 200.53 200.11 0.801650 0.080165 1247 6.0 -6.80 0.2089 167.07 166.57 0.963060 0.096306 1038 7.0 -10.00 0.1000 143.17 142.59 1.125063 0.112506 888 8.0 -14.50 0.0355 125.24 124.57 1.287762 0.128776 776 9.0 -21.60 0.0069 111.29 110.54 1.451261 0.145126 689 10.0 -45.50 0.0000 100.13 99.29 1.615667 0.161567 618 12.0 -21.70 0.0068 83.37 82.37 1.947635 0.194763 513 14.0 -20.60 0.0087 71.40 70.22 2.002814 0.200281 499 16.0 -22.00 0.0063 62.41 61.05 1.003088 0.100309 996 18.0 -23.10 0.0049 55.41 53.88 0.244006 0.024401 4098 20.0 -25.80 0.0026 49.81 48.10 0.157781 0.015778 6337 22.0 -27.90 0.0016 45.22 43.33 0.190495 0.019049 5249 24.0 -22.20 0.0060 41.39 39.32 0.225857 0.022586 4427 26.0 -20.10 0.0098 38.15 35.90 0.235566 0.023557 4245 28.0 -21.70 0.0068 35.38 32.93 0.317912 0.031791 3145 30.0 -27.70 0.0017 32.97 30.32 0.387707 0.038771 2579 32.0 -32.60 0.0005 30.86 28.02 0.443629 0.044363 2254 34.0 -24.00 0.0040 29.00 25.96 0.501047 0.050105 1995 36.0 -21.40 0.0072 27.35 24.10 0.558878 0.055888 1789 38.0 -23.10 0.0049 25.87 22.41 0.625318 0.062532 1599 40.0 -28.50 0.0014 24.55 20.86 0.653690 0.065369 1529 42.0 -22.80 0.0052 23.35 19.44 0.571643 0.057164 1749 44.0 -19.00 0.0126 22.27 18.13 0.629230 0.062923 1589 46.0 -18.30 0.0148 21.29 16.91 0.681863 0.068186 1466 48.0 -19.30 0.0117 20.39 15.76 1.033718 0.103372 967 50.0 -21.10 0.0078 19.57 14.69 1.542403 0.154240 648 52.0 -23.80 0.0042 18.83 13.68 1.689445 0.168945 591 54.0 -28.20 0.0015 18.14 12.72 1.799507 0.179951 555 56.0 -36.30 0.0002 17.51 11.81 1.926427 0.192643 519 58.0 -50.10 0.0000 16.94 10.94 2.036768 0.203677 490 60.0 -39.20 0.0001 16.42 10.11 1.979079 0.197908 505 62.0 -48.70 0.0000 15.94 9.31 1.452268 0.145227 688 64.0 -35.10 0.0003 15.50 8.54 0.828601 0.082860 1206 66.0 -27.20 0.0019 15.10 7.79 0.300092 0.030009 3332 68.0 -23.30 0.0047 14.74 7.07 0.237606 0.023761 4208 70.0 -20.80 0.0083 14.42 6.37 0.833761 0.083376 1199 72.0 -19.30 0.0117 14.13 5.69 1.674992 0.167499 597 74.0 -18.90 0.0129 13.88 5.02 2.388129 0.238813 418 76.0 -19.30 0.0117 13.65 4.37 2.529300 0.252930 395 78.0 -20.00 0.0100 13.46 3.72 2.591685 0.259168 385 80.0 -20.40 0.0091 13.30 3.09 2.630856 0.263086 380 82.0 -21.10 0.0078 13.17 2.46 2.622344 0.262234 381 84.0 -22.50 0.0056 13.07 1.84 2.270222 0.227022 440 86.0 -23.70 0.0043 12.99 1.22 1.951941 0.195194 512 88.0 -24.10 0.0039 12.95 0.61 1.595202 0.159520 626 90.0 -32.20 0.0006 12.94 0.00 1.039417 0.103942 962 146 15 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:TBXLHB-6565A-VTM Antenna Worksheet (45 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 49 Frequency (MHz): 1900 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.02 0.9954 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000033 3017551 1.0 -0.20 0.9550 1003.07 1002.99 0.033141 0.003314 30174 2.0 -1.10 0.7762 501.51 501.34 0.132577 0.013258 7542 3.0 -2.60 0.5495 334.31 334.06 0.298354 0.029835 3351 4.0 -4.90 0.3236 250.70 250.37 0.530542 0.053054 1884 5.0 -8.50 0.1413 200.53 200.11 0.829245 0.082925 1205 6.0 -14.60 0.0347 167.07 166.57 1.194592 0.119459 837 7.0 -24.20 0.0038 143.17 142.59 1.501432 0.150143 666 8.0 -17.30 0.0186 125.24 124.57 1.718559 0.171856 581 9.0 -13.40 0.0457 111.29 110.54 1.936754 0.193675 516 10.0 -12.20 0.0603 100.13 99.29 2.156158 0.215616 463 12.0 -14.20 0.0380 83.37 82.37 1.717944 0.171794 582 14.0 -23.80 0.0042 71.40 70.22 0.727862 0.072786 1373 16.0 -24.40 0.0036 62.41 61.05 0.605755 0.060575 1650 18.0 -20.90 0.0081 55.41 53.88 0.766812 0.076681 1304 20.0 -26.90 0.0020 49.81 48.10 0.943843 0.094384 1059 22.0 -29.10 0.0012 45.22 43.33 0.854588 0.085459 1170 24.0 -21.00 0.0079 41.39 39.32 0.364801 0.036480 2741 26.0 -19.40 0.0115 38.15 35.90 0.243306 0.024331 4110 28.0 -19.30 0.0117 35.38 32.93 0.373027 0.037303 2680 30.0 -17.20 0.0191 32.97 30.32 0.450565 0.045056 2219 32.0 -15.60 0.0275 30.86 28.02 0.599682 0.059968 1667 34.0 -15.60 0.0275 29.00 25.96 1.036896 0.103690 964 36.0 -16.80 0.0209 27.35 24.10 1.494024 0.149402 669 38.0 -18.90 0.0129 25.87 22.41 1.721687 0.172169 580 40.0 -21.60 0.0069 24.55 20.86 1.905068 0.190507 524 42.0 -22.90 0.0051 23.35 19.44 2.096710 0.209671 476 44.0 -22.10 0.0062 22.27 18.13 2.294689 0.229469 435 46.0 -20.60 0.0087 21.29 16.91 2.498399 0.249840 400 48.0 -19.50 0.0112 20.39 15.76 2.510829 0.251083 398 50.0 -19.60 0.0110 19.57 14.69 2.008831 0.200883 497 52.0 -21.20 0.0076 18.83 13.68 1.394501 0.139450 717 54.0 -23.90 0.0041 18.14 12.72 1.441028 0.144103 693 56.0 -28.00 0.0016 17.51 11.81 1.535543 0.153554 651 58.0 -33.60 0.0004 16.94 10.94 1.628386 0.162839 614 60.0 -28.60 0.0014 16.42 10.11 1.721187 0.172119 580 62.0 -25.40 0.0029 15.94 9.31 1.781420 0.178142 561 64.0 -24.60 0.0035 15.50 8.54 1.378708 0.137871 725 66.0 -24.60 0.0035 15.10 7.79 0.747423 0.074742 1337 68.0 -25.40 0.0029 14.74 7.07 0.678309 0.067831 1474 70.0 -27.00 0.0020 14.42 6.37 0.701973 0.070197 1424 72.0 -28.40 0.0014 14.13 5.69 0.722633 0.072263 1383 74.0 -30.10 0.0010 13.88 5.02 0.741821 0.074182 1348 76.0 -32.90 0.0005 13.65 4.37 0.713559 0.071356 1401 78.0 -36.60 0.0002 13.46 3.72 0.525263 0.052526 1903 80.0 -40.00 0.0001 13.30 3.09 0.342539 0.034254 2919 82.0 -40.00 0.0001 13.17 2.46 0.218116 0.021812 4584 84.0 -40.00 0.0001 13.07 1.84 0.091074 0.009107 10980 86.0 -40.00 0.0001 12.99 1.22 0.029690 0.002969 33681 88.0 -40.00 0.0001 12.95 0.61 0.026680 0.002668 37480 90.0 -40.00 0.0001 12.94 0.00 0.026149 0.002615 38242 147 16 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:TBXLHB-6565A-VTM Antenna Worksheet (140 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 49 Frequency (MHz): 1900 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.02 0.9954 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000033 3017551 1.0 -0.20 0.9550 1003.07 1002.99 0.033141 0.003314 30174 2.0 -1.10 0.7762 501.51 501.34 0.132577 0.013258 7542 3.0 -2.60 0.5495 334.31 334.06 0.298354 0.029835 3351 4.0 -4.90 0.3236 250.70 250.37 0.530542 0.053054 1884 5.0 -8.50 0.1413 200.53 200.11 0.829245 0.082925 1205 6.0 -14.60 0.0347 167.07 166.57 1.194592 0.119459 837 7.0 -24.20 0.0038 143.17 142.59 1.501432 0.150143 666 8.0 -17.30 0.0186 125.24 124.57 1.718559 0.171856 581 9.0 -13.40 0.0457 111.29 110.54 1.936754 0.193675 516 10.0 -12.20 0.0603 100.13 99.29 2.156158 0.215616 463 12.0 -14.20 0.0380 83.37 82.37 1.717943 0.171794 582 14.0 -23.80 0.0042 71.40 70.22 0.727341 0.072734 1374 16.0 -24.40 0.0036 62.41 61.05 0.605755 0.060575 1650 18.0 -20.90 0.0081 55.41 53.88 0.766812 0.076681 1304 20.0 -26.90 0.0020 49.81 48.10 0.943843 0.094384 1059 22.0 -29.10 0.0012 45.22 43.33 0.854588 0.085459 1170 24.0 -21.00 0.0079 41.39 39.32 0.364801 0.036480 2741 26.0 -19.40 0.0115 38.15 35.90 0.243306 0.024331 4110 28.0 -19.30 0.0117 35.38 32.93 0.373027 0.037303 2680 30.0 -17.20 0.0191 32.97 30.32 0.450564 0.045056 2219 32.0 -15.60 0.0275 30.86 28.02 0.601812 0.060181 1661 34.0 -15.60 0.0275 29.00 25.96 1.036896 0.103690 964 36.0 -16.80 0.0209 27.35 24.10 1.494024 0.149402 669 38.0 -18.90 0.0129 25.87 22.41 1.721687 0.172169 580 40.0 -21.60 0.0069 24.55 20.86 1.912859 0.191286 522 42.0 -22.90 0.0051 23.35 19.44 2.105722 0.210572 474 44.0 -22.10 0.0062 22.27 18.13 2.303478 0.230348 434 46.0 -20.60 0.0087 21.29 16.91 2.503435 0.250344 399 48.0 -19.50 0.0112 20.39 15.76 2.510829 0.251083 398 50.0 -19.60 0.0110 19.57 14.69 2.008831 0.200883 497 52.0 -21.20 0.0076 18.83 13.68 1.394502 0.139450 717 54.0 -23.90 0.0041 18.14 12.72 1.441028 0.144103 693 56.0 -28.00 0.0016 17.51 11.81 1.535543 0.153554 651 58.0 -33.60 0.0004 16.94 10.94 1.632079 0.163208 612 60.0 -28.60 0.0014 16.42 10.11 1.721187 0.172119 580 62.0 -25.40 0.0029 15.94 9.31 1.781420 0.178142 561 64.0 -24.60 0.0035 15.50 8.54 1.389289 0.138929 719 66.0 -24.60 0.0035 15.10 7.79 0.755082 0.075508 1324 68.0 -25.40 0.0029 14.74 7.07 0.678309 0.067831 1474 70.0 -27.00 0.0020 14.42 6.37 0.701973 0.070197 1424 72.0 -28.40 0.0014 14.13 5.69 0.722633 0.072263 1383 74.0 -30.10 0.0010 13.88 5.02 0.753658 0.075366 1326 76.0 -32.90 0.0005 13.65 4.37 0.725152 0.072515 1379 78.0 -36.60 0.0002 13.46 3.72 0.525263 0.052526 1903 80.0 -40.00 0.0001 13.30 3.09 0.346304 0.034630 2887 82.0 -40.00 0.0001 13.17 2.46 0.219382 0.021938 4558 84.0 -40.00 0.0001 13.07 1.84 0.091074 0.009107 10980 86.0 -40.00 0.0001 12.99 1.22 0.029690 0.002969 33681 88.0 -40.00 0.0001 12.95 0.61 0.026400 0.002640 37879 90.0 -40.00 0.0001 12.94 0.00 0.026487 0.002649 37754 148 17 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:TBXLHB-6565A-VTM Antenna Worksheet (260 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 49 Frequency (MHz): 1900 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.02 0.9954 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000033 3017551 1.0 -0.20 0.9550 1003.07 1002.99 0.033141 0.003314 30174 2.0 -1.10 0.7762 501.51 501.34 0.132577 0.013258 7542 3.0 -2.60 0.5495 334.31 334.06 0.298354 0.029835 3351 4.0 -4.90 0.3236 250.70 250.37 0.530542 0.053054 1884 5.0 -8.50 0.1413 200.53 200.11 0.829245 0.082925 1205 6.0 -14.60 0.0347 167.07 166.57 1.194592 0.119459 837 7.0 -24.20 0.0038 143.17 142.59 1.501432 0.150143 666 8.0 -17.30 0.0186 125.24 124.57 1.718559 0.171856 581 9.0 -13.40 0.0457 111.29 110.54 1.936754 0.193675 516 10.0 -12.20 0.0603 100.13 99.29 2.156158 0.215616 463 12.0 -14.20 0.0380 83.37 82.37 1.717943 0.171794 582 14.0 -23.80 0.0042 71.40 70.22 0.727341 0.072734 1374 16.0 -24.40 0.0036 62.41 61.05 0.605755 0.060575 1650 18.0 -20.90 0.0081 55.41 53.88 0.766812 0.076681 1304 20.0 -26.90 0.0020 49.81 48.10 0.943843 0.094384 1059 22.0 -29.10 0.0012 45.22 43.33 0.854588 0.085459 1170 24.0 -21.00 0.0079 41.39 39.32 0.365266 0.036527 2737 26.0 -19.40 0.0115 38.15 35.90 0.243306 0.024331 4110 28.0 -19.30 0.0117 35.38 32.93 0.373027 0.037303 2680 30.0 -17.20 0.0191 32.97 30.32 0.451714 0.045171 2213 32.0 -15.60 0.0275 30.86 28.02 0.599682 0.059968 1667 34.0 -15.60 0.0275 29.00 25.96 1.040867 0.104087 960 36.0 -16.80 0.0209 27.35 24.10 1.501660 0.150166 665 38.0 -18.90 0.0129 25.87 22.41 1.721687 0.172169 580 40.0 -21.60 0.0069 24.55 20.86 1.912859 0.191286 522 42.0 -22.90 0.0051 23.35 19.44 2.096710 0.209671 476 44.0 -22.10 0.0062 22.27 18.13 2.303478 0.230348 434 46.0 -20.60 0.0087 21.29 16.91 2.503435 0.250344 399 48.0 -19.50 0.0112 20.39 15.76 2.512841 0.251284 397 50.0 -19.60 0.0110 19.57 14.69 2.008831 0.200883 497 52.0 -21.20 0.0076 18.83 13.68 1.394502 0.139450 717 54.0 -23.90 0.0041 18.14 12.72 1.440145 0.144014 694 56.0 -28.00 0.0016 17.51 11.81 1.534774 0.153477 651 58.0 -33.60 0.0004 16.94 10.94 1.628386 0.162839 614 60.0 -28.60 0.0014 16.42 10.11 1.727760 0.172776 578 62.0 -25.40 0.0029 15.94 9.31 1.791115 0.179112 558 64.0 -24.60 0.0035 15.50 8.54 1.389289 0.138929 719 66.0 -24.60 0.0035 15.10 7.79 0.755082 0.075508 1324 68.0 -25.40 0.0029 14.74 7.07 0.678309 0.067831 1474 70.0 -27.00 0.0020 14.42 6.37 0.712996 0.071300 1402 72.0 -28.40 0.0014 14.13 5.69 0.722633 0.072263 1383 74.0 -30.10 0.0010 13.88 5.02 0.741821 0.074182 1348 76.0 -32.90 0.0005 13.65 4.37 0.713559 0.071356 1401 78.0 -36.60 0.0002 13.46 3.72 0.525263 0.052526 1903 80.0 -40.00 0.0001 13.30 3.09 0.342539 0.034254 2919 82.0 -40.00 0.0001 13.17 2.46 0.218116 0.021812 4584 84.0 -40.00 0.0001 13.07 1.84 0.091212 0.009121 10963 86.0 -40.00 0.0001 12.99 1.22 0.029690 0.002969 33681 88.0 -40.00 0.0001 12.95 0.61 0.026680 0.002668 37480 90.0 -40.00 0.0001 12.94 0.00 0.026138 0.002614 38258 149 18 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 Kathrein-Scala:742264 Antenna Worksheet (20 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 566.67 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 49 Frequency (MHz): 850 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.01 0.9977 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000058 1709945 1.0 -0.10 0.9772 1003.07 1002.99 0.033141 0.005848 17098 2.0 -0.30 0.9333 501.51 501.34 0.132577 0.023396 4274 3.0 -0.60 0.8710 334.31 334.06 0.298354 0.052651 1899 4.0 -1.00 0.7943 250.70 250.37 0.530542 0.093625 1068 5.0 -1.40 0.7244 200.53 200.11 0.829245 0.146337 683 6.0 -2.00 0.6310 167.07 166.57 1.194592 0.210810 474 7.0 -2.70 0.5370 143.17 142.59 1.620281 0.285932 349 8.0 -3.50 0.4467 125.24 124.57 2.083549 0.367685 271 9.0 -4.40 0.3631 111.29 110.54 2.558622 0.451522 221 10.0 -5.50 0.2818 100.13 99.29 2.948507 0.520325 192 12.0 -8.20 0.1514 83.37 82.37 3.554331 0.627235 159 14.0 -11.40 0.0724 71.40 70.22 4.169216 0.735744 135 16.0 -14.90 0.0324 62.41 61.05 4.790696 0.845417 118 18.0 -16.80 0.0209 55.41 53.88 4.605947 0.812814 123 20.0 -16.20 0.0240 49.81 48.10 4.010999 0.707823 141 22.0 -15.00 0.0316 45.22 43.33 3.107580 0.548397 182 24.0 -14.20 0.0380 41.39 39.32 2.189773 0.386430 258 26.0 -13.90 0.0407 38.15 35.90 1.398515 0.246797 405 28.0 -14.50 0.0355 35.38 32.93 1.280222 0.225922 442 30.0 -16.00 0.0251 32.97 30.32 1.492412 0.263367 379 32.0 -19.00 0.0126 30.86 28.02 1.701129 0.300199 333 34.0 -25.00 0.0032 29.00 25.96 1.921530 0.339093 294 36.0 -26.70 0.0021 27.35 24.10 2.146941 0.378872 263 38.0 -19.80 0.0105 25.87 22.41 2.389600 0.421694 237 40.0 -16.00 0.0251 24.55 20.86 2.567337 0.453059 220 42.0 -14.00 0.0398 23.35 19.44 2.365827 0.417499 239 44.0 -12.90 0.0513 22.27 18.13 2.034021 0.358945 278 46.0 -12.40 0.0575 21.29 16.91 3.078013 0.543179 184 48.0 -12.30 0.0589 20.39 15.76 4.439319 0.783409 127 50.0 -12.50 0.0562 19.57 14.69 5.494103 0.969548 103 52.0 -13.00 0.0501 18.83 13.68 6.247481 1.102497 90 54.0 -13.80 0.0417 18.14 12.72 6.694804 1.181436 84 56.0 -14.90 0.0324 17.51 11.81 7.146477 1.261143 79 58.0 -16.30 0.0234 16.94 10.94 7.539632 1.330523 75 60.0 -18.00 0.0158 16.42 10.11 7.981185 1.408444 71 62.0 -19.70 0.0107 15.94 9.31 8.189633 1.445229 69 64.0 -21.30 0.0074 15.50 8.54 7.870914 1.388985 71 66.0 -22.60 0.0055 15.10 7.79 6.774943 1.195578 83 68.0 -24.00 0.0040 14.74 7.07 5.256702 0.927653 107 70.0 -25.90 0.0026 14.42 6.37 3.696428 0.652311 153 72.0 -28.60 0.0014 14.13 5.69 2.350407 0.414778 241 74.0 -32.40 0.0006 13.88 5.02 1.566839 0.276501 361 76.0 -37.70 0.0002 13.65 4.37 1.100131 0.194141 515 78.0 -42.00 0.0001 13.46 3.72 0.732090 0.129192 774 80.0 -39.30 0.0001 13.30 3.09 0.377845 0.066678 1499 82.0 -37.30 0.0002 13.17 2.46 0.127347 0.022473 4449 84.0 -37.10 0.0002 13.07 1.84 0.053404 0.009424 10610 86.0 -38.00 0.0002 12.99 1.22 0.054088 0.009545 10476 88.0 -38.70 0.0001 12.95 0.61 0.128821 0.022733 4398 90.0 -33.00 0.0005 12.94 0.00 0.127925 0.022575 4429 150 19 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 Kathrein-Scala:742264 Antenna Worksheet (140 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 566.67 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 49 Frequency (MHz): 850 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.01 0.9977 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000058 1709945 1.0 -0.10 0.9772 1003.07 1002.99 0.033141 0.005848 17098 2.0 -0.30 0.9333 501.51 501.34 0.132577 0.023396 4274 3.0 -0.60 0.8710 334.31 334.06 0.298354 0.052651 1899 4.0 -1.00 0.7943 250.70 250.37 0.530542 0.093625 1068 5.0 -1.40 0.7244 200.53 200.11 0.829245 0.146337 683 6.0 -2.00 0.6310 167.07 166.57 1.194592 0.210810 474 7.0 -2.70 0.5370 143.17 142.59 1.620281 0.285932 349 8.0 -3.50 0.4467 125.24 124.57 2.083549 0.367685 271 9.0 -4.40 0.3631 111.29 110.54 2.558622 0.451522 221 10.0 -5.50 0.2818 100.13 99.29 2.948507 0.520325 192 12.0 -8.20 0.1514 83.37 82.37 3.554331 0.627235 159 14.0 -11.40 0.0724 71.40 70.22 4.169216 0.735744 135 16.0 -14.90 0.0324 62.41 61.05 4.790696 0.845417 118 18.0 -16.80 0.0209 55.41 53.88 4.600080 0.811779 123 20.0 -16.20 0.0240 49.81 48.10 4.016114 0.708726 141 22.0 -15.00 0.0316 45.22 43.33 3.107581 0.548397 182 24.0 -14.20 0.0380 41.39 39.32 2.186984 0.385938 259 26.0 -13.90 0.0407 38.15 35.90 1.395279 0.246226 406 28.0 -14.50 0.0355 35.38 32.93 1.280222 0.225922 442 30.0 -16.00 0.0251 32.97 30.32 1.488420 0.262662 380 32.0 -19.00 0.0126 30.86 28.02 1.701129 0.300199 333 34.0 -25.00 0.0032 29.00 25.96 1.914198 0.337800 296 36.0 -26.70 0.0021 27.35 24.10 2.146941 0.378872 263 38.0 -19.80 0.0105 25.87 22.41 2.389599 0.421694 237 40.0 -16.00 0.0251 24.55 20.86 2.567337 0.453059 220 42.0 -14.00 0.0398 23.35 19.44 2.365827 0.417499 239 44.0 -12.90 0.0513 22.27 18.13 2.034021 0.358945 278 46.0 -12.40 0.0575 21.29 16.91 3.093743 0.545955 183 48.0 -12.30 0.0589 20.39 15.76 4.439319 0.783409 127 50.0 -12.50 0.0562 19.57 14.69 5.494103 0.969548 103 52.0 -13.00 0.0501 18.83 13.68 6.204629 1.094935 91 54.0 -13.80 0.0417 18.14 12.72 6.652281 1.173932 85 56.0 -14.90 0.0324 17.51 11.81 7.095600 1.252165 79 58.0 -16.30 0.0234 16.94 10.94 7.597500 1.340735 74 60.0 -18.00 0.0158 16.42 10.11 7.981185 1.408444 71 62.0 -19.70 0.0107 15.94 9.31 8.189634 1.445230 69 64.0 -21.30 0.0074 15.50 8.54 7.870914 1.388985 71 66.0 -22.60 0.0055 15.10 7.79 6.774943 1.195578 83 68.0 -24.00 0.0040 14.74 7.07 5.210018 0.919415 108 70.0 -25.90 0.0026 14.42 6.37 3.662548 0.646332 154 72.0 -28.60 0.0014 14.13 5.69 2.350407 0.414778 241 74.0 -32.40 0.0006 13.88 5.02 1.566839 0.276501 361 76.0 -37.70 0.0002 13.65 4.37 1.110489 0.195969 510 78.0 -42.00 0.0001 13.46 3.72 0.724711 0.127890 781 80.0 -39.30 0.0001 13.30 3.09 0.377845 0.066678 1499 82.0 -37.30 0.0002 13.17 2.46 0.128526 0.022681 4408 84.0 -37.10 0.0002 13.07 1.84 0.053404 0.009424 10610 86.0 -38.00 0.0002 12.99 1.22 0.053540 0.009448 10584 88.0 -38.70 0.0001 12.95 0.61 0.128821 0.022733 4398 90.0 -33.00 0.0005 12.94 0.00 0.126762 0.022370 4470 151 20 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 Kathrein-Scala:742264 Antenna Worksheet (240 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 566.67 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 49 Frequency (MHz): 850 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.01 0.9977 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000058 1709945 1.0 -0.10 0.9772 1003.07 1002.99 0.033141 0.005848 17098 2.0 -0.30 0.9333 501.51 501.34 0.132577 0.023396 4274 3.0 -0.60 0.8710 334.31 334.06 0.298354 0.052651 1899 4.0 -1.00 0.7943 250.70 250.37 0.530542 0.093625 1068 5.0 -1.40 0.7244 200.53 200.11 0.829245 0.146337 683 6.0 -2.00 0.6310 167.07 166.57 1.194592 0.210810 474 7.0 -2.70 0.5370 143.17 142.59 1.620281 0.285932 349 8.0 -3.50 0.4467 125.24 124.57 2.083549 0.367685 271 9.0 -4.40 0.3631 111.29 110.54 2.558622 0.451522 221 10.0 -5.50 0.2818 100.13 99.29 2.948507 0.520325 192 12.0 -8.20 0.1514 83.37 82.37 3.554331 0.627235 159 14.0 -11.40 0.0724 71.40 70.22 4.169216 0.735744 135 16.0 -14.90 0.0324 62.41 61.05 4.784828 0.844381 118 18.0 -16.80 0.0209 55.41 53.88 4.600080 0.811779 123 20.0 -16.20 0.0240 49.81 48.10 4.016114 0.708726 141 22.0 -15.00 0.0316 45.22 43.33 3.101167 0.547265 182 24.0 -14.20 0.0380 41.39 39.32 2.186984 0.385938 259 26.0 -13.90 0.0407 38.15 35.90 1.398514 0.246797 405 28.0 -14.50 0.0355 35.38 32.93 1.280222 0.225922 442 30.0 -16.00 0.0251 32.97 30.32 1.488420 0.262662 380 32.0 -19.00 0.0126 30.86 28.02 1.701129 0.300199 333 34.0 -25.00 0.0032 29.00 25.96 1.921530 0.339093 294 36.0 -26.70 0.0021 27.35 24.10 2.146942 0.378872 263 38.0 -19.80 0.0105 25.87 22.41 2.398740 0.423307 236 40.0 -16.00 0.0251 24.55 20.86 2.557541 0.451331 221 42.0 -14.00 0.0398 23.35 19.44 2.355702 0.415712 240 44.0 -12.90 0.0513 22.27 18.13 2.034021 0.358945 278 46.0 -12.40 0.0575 21.29 16.91 3.078013 0.543179 184 48.0 -12.30 0.0589 20.39 15.76 4.464118 0.787786 126 50.0 -12.50 0.0562 19.57 14.69 5.494103 0.969548 103 52.0 -13.00 0.0501 18.83 13.68 6.247481 1.102497 90 54.0 -13.80 0.0417 18.14 12.72 6.652281 1.173932 85 56.0 -14.90 0.0324 17.51 11.81 7.146478 1.261143 79 58.0 -16.30 0.0234 16.94 10.94 7.539632 1.330523 75 60.0 -18.00 0.0158 16.42 10.11 8.042443 1.419255 70 62.0 -19.70 0.0107 15.94 9.31 8.252492 1.456322 68 64.0 -21.30 0.0074 15.50 8.54 7.870914 1.388985 71 66.0 -22.60 0.0055 15.10 7.79 6.774943 1.195578 83 68.0 -24.00 0.0040 14.74 7.07 5.256702 0.927653 107 70.0 -25.90 0.0026 14.42 6.37 3.696428 0.652311 153 72.0 -28.60 0.0014 14.13 5.69 2.374492 0.419028 238 74.0 -32.40 0.0006 13.88 5.02 1.551363 0.273770 365 76.0 -37.70 0.0002 13.65 4.37 1.100131 0.194141 515 78.0 -42.00 0.0001 13.46 3.72 0.732090 0.129192 774 80.0 -39.30 0.0001 13.30 3.09 0.377845 0.066678 1499 82.0 -37.30 0.0002 13.17 2.46 0.127348 0.022473 4449 84.0 -37.10 0.0002 13.07 1.84 0.053945 0.009520 10504 86.0 -38.00 0.0002 12.99 1.22 0.053540 0.009448 10584 88.0 -38.70 0.0001 12.95 0.61 0.128821 0.022733 4398 90.0 -33.00 0.0005 12.94 0.00 0.127871 0.022566 4431 152 21 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:TBXLHB-6565A-VTM Antenna Worksheet (45 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 566.67 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 49 Frequency (MHz): 850 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 0.00 1.0000 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000058 1709945 1.0 0.00 1.0000 1003.07 1002.99 0.033141 0.005848 17098 2.0 0.00 1.0000 501.51 501.34 0.132577 0.023396 4274 3.0 -0.10 0.9772 334.31 334.06 0.298354 0.052651 1899 4.0 -0.30 0.9333 250.70 250.37 0.530542 0.093625 1068 5.0 -0.60 0.8710 200.53 200.11 0.829245 0.146337 683 6.0 -1.00 0.7943 167.07 166.57 1.194592 0.210810 474 7.0 -1.50 0.7079 143.17 142.59 1.626740 0.287072 348 8.0 -2.10 0.6166 125.24 124.57 2.125875 0.375154 266 9.0 -2.90 0.5129 111.29 110.54 2.692207 0.475095 210 10.0 -3.80 0.4169 100.13 99.29 3.164584 0.558456 179 12.0 -6.00 0.2512 83.37 82.37 3.814805 0.673201 148 14.0 -9.10 0.1230 71.40 70.22 4.474751 0.789662 126 16.0 -13.60 0.0437 62.41 61.05 5.146290 0.908169 110 18.0 -21.40 0.0072 55.41 53.88 5.831414 1.029073 97 20.0 -35.10 0.0003 49.81 48.10 5.825641 1.028054 97 22.0 -20.00 0.0100 45.22 43.33 4.890653 0.863056 115 24.0 -16.50 0.0224 41.39 39.32 3.610761 0.637193 156 26.0 -15.20 0.0302 38.15 35.90 2.225919 0.392809 254 28.0 -15.50 0.0282 35.38 32.93 1.189437 0.209901 476 30.0 -16.50 0.0224 32.97 30.32 1.128989 0.199233 501 32.0 -18.80 0.0132 30.86 28.02 1.285400 0.226835 440 34.0 -22.20 0.0060 29.00 25.96 1.451928 0.256223 390 36.0 -28.50 0.0014 27.35 24.10 1.628448 0.287373 347 38.0 -39.30 0.0001 25.87 22.41 1.814782 0.320256 312 40.0 -28.10 0.0015 24.55 20.86 2.008116 0.354373 282 42.0 -22.80 0.0052 23.35 19.44 1.988139 0.350848 285 44.0 -20.30 0.0093 22.27 18.13 1.636373 0.288772 346 46.0 -18.80 0.0132 21.29 16.91 1.053591 0.185928 537 48.0 -18.30 0.0148 20.39 15.76 0.802710 0.141655 705 50.0 -18.20 0.0151 19.57 14.69 1.300621 0.229521 435 52.0 -19.00 0.0126 18.83 13.68 1.649056 0.291010 343 54.0 -20.00 0.0100 18.14 12.72 1.850585 0.326574 306 56.0 -21.60 0.0069 17.51 11.81 1.972249 0.348044 287 58.0 -23.80 0.0042 16.94 10.94 2.092609 0.369284 270 60.0 -26.00 0.0025 16.42 10.11 2.211929 0.390340 256 62.0 -29.10 0.0012 15.94 9.31 2.331403 0.411424 243 64.0 -31.80 0.0007 15.50 8.54 2.134564 0.376688 265 66.0 -35.90 0.0003 15.10 7.79 1.745884 0.308097 324 68.0 -37.50 0.0002 14.74 7.07 1.175032 0.207359 482 70.0 -38.80 0.0001 14.42 6.37 0.701705 0.123830 807 72.0 -35.50 0.0003 14.13 5.69 0.332635 0.058700 1703 74.0 -33.90 0.0004 13.88 5.02 0.160827 0.028381 3523 76.0 -32.10 0.0006 13.65 4.37 0.120443 0.021255 4704 78.0 -30.60 0.0009 13.46 3.72 0.201722 0.035598 2809 80.0 -30.40 0.0009 13.30 3.09 0.227873 0.040213 2486 82.0 -29.60 0.0011 13.17 2.46 0.273181 0.048208 2074 84.0 -29.40 0.0011 13.07 1.84 0.273273 0.048225 2073 86.0 -29.60 0.0011 12.99 1.22 0.272363 0.048064 2080 88.0 -29.40 0.0011 12.95 0.61 0.270618 0.047756 2093 90.0 -30.10 0.0010 12.94 0.00 0.276027 0.048711 2052 153 22 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:TBXLHB-6565A-VTM Antenna Worksheet (140 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 566.67 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 49 Frequency (MHz): 850 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 0.00 1.0000 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000058 1709945 1.0 0.00 1.0000 1003.07 1002.99 0.033141 0.005848 17098 2.0 0.00 1.0000 501.51 501.34 0.132577 0.023396 4274 3.0 -0.10 0.9772 334.31 334.06 0.298354 0.052651 1899 4.0 -0.30 0.9333 250.70 250.37 0.530542 0.093625 1068 5.0 -0.60 0.8710 200.53 200.11 0.829245 0.146337 683 6.0 -1.00 0.7943 167.07 166.57 1.194592 0.210810 474 7.0 -1.50 0.7079 143.17 142.59 1.626741 0.287072 348 8.0 -2.10 0.6166 125.24 124.57 2.125875 0.375154 266 9.0 -2.90 0.5129 111.29 110.54 2.692207 0.475095 210 10.0 -3.80 0.4169 100.13 99.29 3.164584 0.558456 179 12.0 -6.00 0.2512 83.37 82.37 3.814805 0.673201 148 14.0 -9.10 0.1230 71.40 70.22 4.474751 0.789662 126 16.0 -13.60 0.0437 62.41 61.05 5.146290 0.908169 110 18.0 -21.40 0.0072 55.41 53.88 5.831414 1.029073 97 20.0 -35.10 0.0003 49.81 48.10 5.811197 1.025505 97 22.0 -20.00 0.0100 45.22 43.33 4.880558 0.861275 116 24.0 -16.50 0.0224 41.39 39.32 3.610762 0.637193 156 26.0 -15.20 0.0302 38.15 35.90 2.225919 0.392809 254 28.0 -15.50 0.0282 35.38 32.93 1.189437 0.209901 476 30.0 -16.50 0.0224 32.97 30.32 1.128989 0.199233 501 32.0 -18.80 0.0132 30.86 28.02 1.280496 0.225970 442 34.0 -22.20 0.0060 29.00 25.96 1.451928 0.256223 390 36.0 -28.50 0.0014 27.35 24.10 1.628448 0.287373 347 38.0 -39.30 0.0001 25.87 22.41 1.814781 0.320256 312 40.0 -28.10 0.0015 24.55 20.86 2.000454 0.353021 283 42.0 -22.80 0.0052 23.35 19.44 1.979630 0.349347 286 44.0 -20.30 0.0093 22.27 18.13 1.629107 0.287489 347 46.0 -18.80 0.0132 21.29 16.91 1.049571 0.185218 539 48.0 -18.30 0.0148 20.39 15.76 0.802710 0.141655 705 50.0 -18.20 0.0151 19.57 14.69 1.300621 0.229521 435 52.0 -19.00 0.0126 18.83 13.68 1.649056 0.291010 343 54.0 -20.00 0.0100 18.14 12.72 1.850586 0.326574 306 56.0 -21.60 0.0069 17.51 11.81 1.972249 0.348044 287 58.0 -23.80 0.0042 16.94 10.94 2.095277 0.369755 270 60.0 -26.00 0.0025 16.42 10.11 2.211929 0.390340 256 62.0 -29.10 0.0012 15.94 9.31 2.331403 0.411424 243 64.0 -31.80 0.0007 15.50 8.54 2.140011 0.377649 264 66.0 -35.90 0.0003 15.10 7.79 1.750340 0.308884 323 68.0 -37.50 0.0002 14.74 7.07 1.175032 0.207359 482 70.0 -38.80 0.0001 14.42 6.37 0.701705 0.123830 807 72.0 -35.50 0.0003 14.13 5.69 0.332635 0.058700 1703 74.0 -33.90 0.0004 13.88 5.02 0.161974 0.028584 3498 76.0 -32.10 0.0006 13.65 4.37 0.121732 0.021482 4655 78.0 -30.60 0.0009 13.46 3.72 0.201722 0.035598 2809 80.0 -30.40 0.0009 13.30 3.09 0.232146 0.040967 2440 82.0 -29.60 0.0011 13.17 2.46 0.279328 0.049293 2028 84.0 -29.40 0.0011 13.07 1.84 0.273273 0.048225 2073 86.0 -29.60 0.0011 12.99 1.22 0.272363 0.048064 2080 88.0 -29.40 0.0011 12.95 0.61 0.278918 0.049221 2031 90.0 -30.10 0.0010 12.94 0.00 0.268395 0.047364 2111 154 23 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:TBXLHB-6565A-VTM Antenna Worksheet (260 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 566.67 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 49 Frequency (MHz): 850 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 0.00 1.0000 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000058 1709945 1.0 0.00 1.0000 1003.07 1002.99 0.033141 0.005848 17098 2.0 0.00 1.0000 501.51 501.34 0.132577 0.023396 4274 3.0 -0.10 0.9772 334.31 334.06 0.298354 0.052651 1899 4.0 -0.30 0.9333 250.70 250.37 0.530542 0.093625 1068 5.0 -0.60 0.8710 200.53 200.11 0.829245 0.146337 683 6.0 -1.00 0.7943 167.07 166.57 1.194592 0.210810 474 7.0 -1.50 0.7079 143.17 142.59 1.626740 0.287072 348 8.0 -2.10 0.6166 125.24 124.57 2.125875 0.375154 266 9.0 -2.90 0.5129 111.29 110.54 2.692207 0.475095 210 10.0 -3.80 0.4169 100.13 99.29 3.164584 0.558456 179 12.0 -6.00 0.2512 83.37 82.37 3.814805 0.673201 148 14.0 -9.10 0.1230 71.40 70.22 4.474751 0.789662 126 16.0 -13.60 0.0437 62.41 61.05 5.146290 0.908169 110 18.0 -21.40 0.0072 55.41 53.88 5.831414 1.029073 97 20.0 -35.10 0.0003 49.81 48.10 5.825642 1.028054 97 22.0 -20.00 0.0100 45.22 43.33 4.880558 0.861275 116 24.0 -16.50 0.0224 41.39 39.32 3.601570 0.635571 157 26.0 -15.20 0.0302 38.15 35.90 2.225920 0.392809 254 28.0 -15.50 0.0282 35.38 32.93 1.189437 0.209901 476 30.0 -16.50 0.0224 32.97 30.32 1.124681 0.198473 503 32.0 -18.80 0.0132 30.86 28.02 1.285400 0.226835 440 34.0 -22.20 0.0060 29.00 25.96 1.446388 0.255245 391 36.0 -28.50 0.0014 27.35 24.10 1.622234 0.286277 349 38.0 -39.30 0.0001 25.87 22.41 1.814781 0.320256 312 40.0 -28.10 0.0015 24.55 20.86 2.000454 0.353021 283 42.0 -22.80 0.0052 23.35 19.44 1.988139 0.350848 285 44.0 -20.30 0.0093 22.27 18.13 1.629107 0.287489 347 46.0 -18.80 0.0132 21.29 16.91 1.049570 0.185218 539 48.0 -18.30 0.0148 20.39 15.76 0.800667 0.141294 707 50.0 -18.20 0.0151 19.57 14.69 1.300621 0.229521 435 52.0 -19.00 0.0126 18.83 13.68 1.649056 0.291010 343 54.0 -20.00 0.0100 18.14 12.72 1.849362 0.326358 306 56.0 -21.60 0.0069 17.51 11.81 1.972249 0.348044 287 58.0 -23.80 0.0042 16.94 10.94 2.092609 0.369284 270 60.0 -26.00 0.0025 16.42 10.11 2.217560 0.391334 255 62.0 -29.10 0.0012 15.94 9.31 2.337352 0.412474 242 64.0 -31.80 0.0007 15.50 8.54 2.140011 0.377649 264 66.0 -35.90 0.0003 15.10 7.79 1.750340 0.308884 323 68.0 -37.50 0.0002 14.74 7.07 1.175032 0.207359 482 70.0 -38.80 0.0001 14.42 6.37 0.703698 0.124182 805 72.0 -35.50 0.0003 14.13 5.69 0.332635 0.058700 1703 74.0 -33.90 0.0004 13.88 5.02 0.160827 0.028381 3523 76.0 -32.10 0.0006 13.65 4.37 0.120443 0.021255 4704 78.0 -30.60 0.0009 13.46 3.72 0.201722 0.035598 2809 80.0 -30.40 0.0009 13.30 3.09 0.227873 0.040213 2486 82.0 -29.60 0.0011 13.17 2.46 0.273181 0.048208 2074 84.0 -29.40 0.0011 13.07 1.84 0.280361 0.049476 2021 86.0 -29.60 0.0011 12.99 1.22 0.272363 0.048064 2080 88.0 -29.40 0.0011 12.95 0.61 0.270618 0.047756 2093 90.0 -30.10 0.0010 12.94 0.00 0.276027 0.048711 2052 155 24 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:DBXNH-6565A-VTM Antenna Worksheet (45 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 491.33 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 43 Frequency (MHz): 737 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.08 0.9813 10030.90 10030.90 0.000330 0.000067 1489248 1.0 -0.01 0.9977 1003.05 1002.99 0.033038 0.006724 14871 2.0 0.00 1.0000 501.46 501.34 0.132377 0.026942 3711 3.0 -0.08 0.9817 334.24 334.06 0.298405 0.060734 1646 4.0 -0.24 0.9462 250.61 250.37 0.530254 0.107921 926 5.0 -0.50 0.8913 200.42 200.11 0.827907 0.168502 593 6.0 -0.84 0.8241 166.94 166.57 1.191488 0.242501 412 7.0 -1.27 0.7464 143.02 142.59 1.617666 0.329240 303 8.0 -1.80 0.6607 125.06 124.57 2.131851 0.433891 230 9.0 -2.43 0.5715 111.09 110.54 2.453072 0.499268 200 10.0 -3.20 0.4786 99.91 99.29 2.730968 0.555828 179 12.0 -5.06 0.3119 83.11 82.37 3.292095 0.670033 149 14.0 -7.54 0.1762 71.09 70.22 3.861614 0.785946 127 16.0 -10.79 0.0834 62.06 61.05 4.441138 0.903895 110 18.0 -14.89 0.0324 55.01 53.88 5.032385 1.024230 97 20.0 -18.55 0.0140 49.37 48.10 5.637203 1.147328 87 22.0 -18.14 0.0153 44.73 43.33 6.257594 1.273594 78 24.0 -15.98 0.0252 40.86 39.32 6.895741 1.403475 71 26.0 -14.56 0.0350 37.57 35.90 7.454764 1.517252 65 28.0 -13.97 0.0401 34.75 32.93 5.916638 1.204201 83 30.0 -14.09 0.0390 32.29 30.32 4.252886 0.865581 115 32.0 -14.83 0.0329 30.14 28.02 2.685293 0.546532 182 34.0 -16.15 0.0243 28.23 25.96 1.921177 0.391013 255 36.0 -18.06 0.0156 26.53 24.10 2.256249 0.459209 217 38.0 -20.62 0.0087 25.01 22.41 2.534514 0.515844 193 40.0 -23.98 0.0040 23.64 20.86 2.828467 0.575672 173 42.0 -28.47 0.0014 22.39 19.44 3.140329 0.639144 156 44.0 -34.43 0.0004 21.26 18.13 3.469858 0.706213 141 46.0 -36.11 0.0002 20.23 16.91 3.816926 0.776851 128 48.0 -31.82 0.0007 19.28 15.76 4.013628 0.816885 122 50.0 -28.92 0.0013 18.42 14.69 3.725371 0.758217 131 52.0 -27.16 0.0019 17.62 13.68 3.030259 0.616742 162 54.0 -26.14 0.0024 16.89 12.72 2.127446 0.432994 230 56.0 -25.60 0.0028 16.21 11.81 1.252090 0.254835 392 58.0 -25.44 0.0029 15.59 10.94 0.578763 0.117794 848 60.0 -25.59 0.0028 15.02 10.11 0.358947 0.073056 1368 62.0 -25.96 0.0025 14.49 9.31 0.503102 0.102395 976 64.0 -26.51 0.0022 14.01 8.54 0.605555 0.123247 811 66.0 -27.19 0.0019 13.57 7.79 0.654195 0.133147 751 68.0 -27.92 0.0016 13.17 7.07 0.687438 0.139913 714 70.0 -28.58 0.0014 12.80 6.37 0.718903 0.146317 683 72.0 -29.11 0.0012 12.48 5.69 0.747843 0.152207 657 74.0 -29.55 0.0011 12.19 5.02 0.731306 0.148841 671 76.0 -29.88 0.0010 11.93 4.37 0.649553 0.132202 756 78.0 -30.12 0.0010 11.71 3.72 0.535592 0.109008 917 80.0 -30.37 0.0009 11.53 3.09 0.433114 0.088151 1134 82.0 -30.52 0.0009 11.38 2.46 0.365709 0.074432 1343 84.0 -30.68 0.0009 11.26 1.84 0.322143 0.065565 1525 86.0 -30.90 0.0008 11.17 1.22 0.295073 0.060056 1665 88.0 -31.13 0.0008 11.12 0.61 0.272645 0.055491 1802 90.0 -31.40 0.0007 11.11 0.00 0.266711 0.054283 1842 156 25 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:DBXNH-6565A-VTM Antenna Worksheet (140 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 491.33 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 43 Frequency (MHz): 737 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.08 0.9813 10030.90 10030.90 0.000331 0.000067 1482622 1.0 -0.01 0.9977 1003.05 1002.99 0.033142 0.006745 14825 2.0 0.00 1.0000 501.46 501.34 0.132377 0.026942 3711 3.0 -0.08 0.9817 334.24 334.06 0.298405 0.060734 1646 4.0 -0.24 0.9462 250.61 250.37 0.530254 0.107921 926 5.0 -0.50 0.8913 200.42 200.11 0.827907 0.168502 593 6.0 -0.84 0.8241 166.94 166.57 1.191488 0.242501 412 7.0 -1.27 0.7464 143.02 142.59 1.630237 0.331799 301 8.0 -1.80 0.6607 125.06 124.57 2.131851 0.433891 230 9.0 -2.43 0.5715 111.09 110.54 2.453072 0.499268 200 10.0 -3.20 0.4786 99.91 99.29 2.730968 0.555828 179 12.0 -5.06 0.3119 83.11 82.37 3.292095 0.670033 149 14.0 -7.54 0.1762 71.09 70.22 3.861614 0.785946 127 16.0 -10.79 0.0834 62.06 61.05 4.441138 0.903895 110 18.0 -14.89 0.0324 55.01 53.88 5.032385 1.024230 97 20.0 -18.55 0.0140 49.37 48.10 5.637203 1.147328 87 22.0 -18.14 0.0153 44.73 43.33 6.257594 1.273594 78 24.0 -15.98 0.0252 40.86 39.32 6.895741 1.403475 71 26.0 -14.56 0.0350 37.57 35.90 7.454764 1.517252 65 28.0 -13.97 0.0401 34.75 32.93 5.916638 1.204201 83 30.0 -14.09 0.0390 32.29 30.32 4.252886 0.865581 115 32.0 -14.83 0.0329 30.14 28.02 2.712633 0.552096 181 34.0 -16.15 0.0243 28.23 25.96 1.921178 0.391013 255 36.0 -18.06 0.0156 26.53 24.10 2.256248 0.459209 217 38.0 -20.62 0.0087 25.01 22.41 2.534514 0.515844 193 40.0 -23.98 0.0040 23.64 20.86 2.869167 0.583955 171 42.0 -28.47 0.0014 22.39 19.44 3.188588 0.648966 154 44.0 -34.43 0.0004 21.26 18.13 3.526901 0.717823 139 46.0 -36.11 0.0002 20.23 16.91 3.883757 0.790453 126 48.0 -31.82 0.0007 19.28 15.76 4.013627 0.816885 122 50.0 -28.92 0.0013 18.42 14.69 3.725371 0.758217 131 52.0 -27.16 0.0019 17.62 13.68 3.030262 0.616742 162 54.0 -26.14 0.0024 16.89 12.72 2.127447 0.432995 230 56.0 -25.60 0.0028 16.21 11.81 1.252091 0.254835 392 58.0 -25.44 0.0029 15.59 10.94 0.593045 0.120701 828 60.0 -25.59 0.0028 15.02 10.11 0.358947 0.073056 1368 62.0 -25.96 0.0025 14.49 9.31 0.503102 0.102395 976 64.0 -26.51 0.0022 14.01 8.54 0.622905 0.126778 788 66.0 -27.19 0.0019 13.57 7.79 0.673970 0.137172 729 68.0 -27.92 0.0016 13.17 7.07 0.687438 0.139913 714 70.0 -28.58 0.0014 12.80 6.37 0.718903 0.146317 683 72.0 -29.11 0.0012 12.48 5.69 0.747843 0.152207 657 74.0 -29.55 0.0011 12.19 5.02 0.758813 0.154440 647 76.0 -29.88 0.0010 11.93 4.37 0.675531 0.137489 727 78.0 -30.12 0.0010 11.71 3.72 0.535592 0.109008 917 80.0 -30.37 0.0009 11.53 3.09 0.452854 0.092168 1084 82.0 -30.52 0.0009 11.38 2.46 0.383589 0.078071 1280 84.0 -30.68 0.0009 11.26 1.84 0.322143 0.065565 1525 86.0 -30.90 0.0008 11.17 1.22 0.295073 0.060056 1665 88.0 -31.13 0.0008 11.12 0.61 0.288777 0.058774 1701 90.0 -31.40 0.0007 11.11 0.00 0.251109 0.051108 1956 157 26 of 41 AT&T Mobility LLC Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:DBXNH-6565A-VTM Antenna Worksheet (250 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 491.33 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 43 Frequency (MHz): 737 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.08 0.9813 10030.90 10030.90 0.000331 0.000067 1482622 1.0 -0.01 0.9977 1003.05 1002.99 0.033038 0.006724 14871 2.0 0.00 1.0000 501.46 501.34 0.132600 0.026988 3705 3.0 -0.08 0.9817 334.24 334.06 0.298405 0.060734 1646 4.0 -0.24 0.9462 250.61 250.37 0.530914 0.108056 925 5.0 -0.50 0.8913 200.42 200.11 0.827907 0.168502 593 6.0 -0.84 0.8241 166.94 166.57 1.191488 0.242501 412 7.0 -1.27 0.7464 143.02 142.59 1.617666 0.329240 303 8.0 -1.80 0.6607 125.06 124.57 2.131851 0.433891 230 9.0 -2.43 0.5715 111.09 110.54 2.453072 0.499268 200 10.0 -3.20 0.4786 99.91 99.29 2.730968 0.555828 179 12.0 -5.06 0.3119 83.11 82.37 3.292095 0.670033 149 14.0 -7.54 0.1762 71.09 70.22 3.861614 0.785946 127 16.0 -10.79 0.0834 62.06 61.05 4.441138 0.903895 110 18.0 -14.89 0.0324 55.01 53.88 5.032385 1.024230 97 20.0 -18.55 0.0140 49.37 48.10 5.637203 1.147328 87 22.0 -18.14 0.0153 44.73 43.33 6.257594 1.273594 78 24.0 -15.98 0.0252 40.86 39.32 6.895741 1.403475 71 26.0 -14.56 0.0350 37.57 35.90 7.454767 1.517252 65 28.0 -13.97 0.0401 34.75 32.93 5.965516 1.214148 82 30.0 -14.09 0.0390 32.29 30.32 4.252886 0.865581 115 32.0 -14.83 0.0329 30.14 28.02 2.685292 0.546531 182 34.0 -16.15 0.0243 28.23 25.96 1.921177 0.391013 255 36.0 -18.06 0.0156 26.53 24.10 2.283941 0.464845 215 38.0 -20.62 0.0087 25.01 22.41 2.568270 0.522714 191 40.0 -23.98 0.0040 23.64 20.86 2.828468 0.575672 173 42.0 -28.47 0.0014 22.39 19.44 3.140328 0.639144 156 44.0 -34.43 0.0004 21.26 18.13 3.469858 0.706213 141 46.0 -36.11 0.0002 20.23 16.91 3.883757 0.790453 126 48.0 -31.82 0.0007 19.28 15.76 4.088482 0.832120 120 50.0 -28.92 0.0013 18.42 14.69 3.799819 0.773369 129 52.0 -27.16 0.0019 17.62 13.68 3.030259 0.616742 162 54.0 -26.14 0.0024 16.89 12.72 2.127449 0.432995 230 56.0 -25.60 0.0028 16.21 11.81 1.252091 0.254835 392 58.0 -25.44 0.0029 15.59 10.94 0.593044 0.120701 828 60.0 -25.59 0.0028 15.02 10.11 0.368282 0.074956 1334 62.0 -25.96 0.0025 14.49 9.31 0.516824 0.105188 950 64.0 -26.51 0.0022 14.01 8.54 0.605555 0.123247 811 66.0 -27.19 0.0019 13.57 7.79 0.654195 0.133147 751 68.0 -27.92 0.0016 13.17 7.07 0.687438 0.139913 714 70.0 -28.58 0.0014 12.80 6.37 0.718903 0.146317 683 72.0 -29.11 0.0012 12.48 5.69 0.774258 0.157583 634 74.0 -29.55 0.0011 12.19 5.02 0.731306 0.148841 671 76.0 -29.88 0.0010 11.93 4.37 0.675531 0.137489 727 78.0 -30.12 0.0010 11.71 3.72 0.535592 0.109008 917 80.0 -30.37 0.0009 11.53 3.09 0.433114 0.088151 1134 82.0 -30.52 0.0009 11.38 2.46 0.383589 0.078071 1280 84.0 -30.68 0.0009 11.26 1.84 0.339013 0.068999 1449 86.0 -30.90 0.0008 11.17 1.22 0.295073 0.060056 1665 88.0 -31.13 0.0008 11.12 0.61 0.272645 0.055491 1802 90.0 -31.40 0.0007 11.11 0.00 0.266711 0.054283 1842 158 27 of 41 Clearwire Westgate (Revised) 816226 Kathrein-Scala:84010054 Antenna Worksheet (350 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 355 Height (feet): 64 Frequency (MHz): 2500 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.03 0.9943 10030.91 10030.90 0.000118 0.000012 8500156 1.0 -0.25 0.9441 1003.14 1002.99 0.011763 0.001176 85010 2.0 -1.04 0.7870 501.65 501.34 0.047039 0.004704 21259 3.0 -2.41 0.5741 334.52 334.06 0.105784 0.010578 9453 4.0 -4.45 0.3589 250.98 250.37 0.177006 0.017701 5649 5.0 -7.22 0.1897 200.87 200.11 0.238196 0.023820 4198 6.0 -10.57 0.0877 167.49 166.57 0.286156 0.028616 3494 7.0 -13.00 0.0501 143.66 142.59 0.334292 0.033429 2991 8.0 -12.71 0.0536 125.79 124.57 0.382635 0.038264 2613 9.0 -11.58 0.0695 111.91 110.54 0.360385 0.036038 2774 10.0 -11.17 0.0764 100.82 99.29 0.243662 0.024366 4104 12.0 -13.50 0.0447 84.21 82.37 0.148414 0.014841 6737 14.0 -20.99 0.0080 72.37 70.22 0.200835 0.020083 4979 16.0 -19.11 0.0123 63.52 61.05 0.228657 0.022866 4373 18.0 -16.05 0.0248 56.65 53.88 0.113503 0.011350 8810 20.0 -17.47 0.0179 51.19 48.10 0.137050 0.013705 7296 22.0 -20.64 0.0086 46.73 43.33 0.166170 0.016617 6017 24.0 -19.93 0.0102 43.04 39.32 0.184323 0.018432 5425 26.0 -18.90 0.0129 39.94 35.90 0.204222 0.020422 4896 28.0 -18.44 0.0143 37.29 32.93 0.353991 0.035399 2824 30.0 -16.49 0.0224 35.01 30.32 0.462077 0.046208 2164 32.0 -14.58 0.0348 33.04 28.02 0.513977 0.051398 1945 34.0 -13.96 0.0402 31.31 25.96 0.576660 0.057666 1734 36.0 -14.62 0.0345 29.79 24.10 0.636492 0.063649 1571 38.0 -16.45 0.0226 28.44 22.41 0.687958 0.068796 1453 40.0 -19.74 0.0106 27.24 20.86 0.730061 0.073006 1369 42.0 -25.61 0.0027 26.16 19.44 0.593097 0.059310 1686 44.0 -34.40 0.0004 25.20 18.13 0.377962 0.037796 2645 46.0 -29.69 0.0011 24.34 16.91 0.157249 0.015725 6359 48.0 -27.36 0.0018 23.56 15.76 0.056748 0.005675 17621 50.0 -27.38 0.0018 22.85 14.69 0.058781 0.005878 17012 52.0 -28.45 0.0014 22.22 13.68 0.061892 0.006189 16157 54.0 -30.39 0.0009 21.64 12.72 0.066444 0.006644 15050 56.0 -32.71 0.0005 21.12 11.81 0.060845 0.006084 16435 58.0 -32.17 0.0006 20.64 10.94 0.051675 0.005168 19351 60.0 -29.83 0.0010 20.22 10.11 0.060264 0.006026 16593 62.0 -28.63 0.0014 19.83 9.31 0.068266 0.006827 14648 64.0 -28.21 0.0015 19.48 8.54 0.072367 0.007237 13818 66.0 -27.79 0.0017 19.16 7.79 0.074326 0.007433 13454 68.0 -27.72 0.0017 18.88 7.07 0.073798 0.007380 13550 70.0 -28.67 0.0014 18.63 6.37 0.077708 0.007771 12868 72.0 -30.61 0.0009 18.41 5.69 0.076556 0.007656 13062 74.0 -32.63 0.0005 18.21 5.02 0.071334 0.007133 14018 76.0 -33.69 0.0004 18.04 4.37 0.052068 0.005207 19205 78.0 -34.49 0.0004 17.90 3.72 0.032983 0.003298 30319 80.0 -37.34 0.0002 17.78 3.09 0.023394 0.002339 42745 82.0 -44.09 0.0000 17.68 2.46 0.020216 0.002022 49466 84.0 -45.81 0.0000 17.60 1.84 0.015127 0.001513 66106 86.0 -41.56 0.0001 17.55 1.22 0.005246 0.000525 190603 88.0 -40.61 0.0001 17.52 0.61 0.004784 0.000478 209021 90.0 -44.30 0.0000 17.51 0.00 0.006881 0.000688 145327 159 28 of 41 Clearwire Westgate (Revised) 816226 Kathrein-Scala:84010054 Antenna Worksheet (110 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 355 Height (feet): 64 Frequency (MHz): 2500 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.03 0.9943 10030.91 10030.90 0.000118 0.000012 8500155 1.0 -0.25 0.9441 1003.14 1002.99 0.011763 0.001176 85010 2.0 -1.04 0.7870 501.65 501.34 0.047039 0.004704 21259 3.0 -2.41 0.5741 334.52 334.06 0.105784 0.010578 9453 4.0 -4.45 0.3589 250.98 250.37 0.177006 0.017701 5649 5.0 -7.22 0.1897 200.87 200.11 0.238196 0.023820 4198 6.0 -10.57 0.0877 167.49 166.57 0.286156 0.028616 3494 7.0 -13.00 0.0501 143.66 142.59 0.334292 0.033429 2991 8.0 -12.71 0.0536 125.79 124.57 0.382635 0.038264 2613 9.0 -11.58 0.0695 111.91 110.54 0.356820 0.035682 2802 10.0 -11.17 0.0764 100.82 99.29 0.240975 0.024098 4149 12.0 -13.50 0.0447 84.21 82.37 0.146497 0.014650 6826 14.0 -20.99 0.0080 72.37 70.22 0.200835 0.020083 4979 16.0 -19.11 0.0123 63.52 61.05 0.228657 0.022866 4373 18.0 -16.05 0.0248 56.65 53.88 0.113503 0.011350 8810 20.0 -17.47 0.0179 51.19 48.10 0.137050 0.013705 7296 22.0 -20.64 0.0086 46.73 43.33 0.166170 0.016617 6017 24.0 -19.93 0.0102 43.04 39.32 0.184323 0.018432 5425 26.0 -18.90 0.0129 39.94 35.90 0.205895 0.020589 4856 28.0 -18.44 0.0143 37.29 32.93 0.353991 0.035399 2824 30.0 -16.49 0.0224 35.01 30.32 0.462077 0.046208 2164 32.0 -14.58 0.0348 33.04 28.02 0.518385 0.051838 1929 34.0 -13.96 0.0402 31.31 25.96 0.576660 0.057666 1734 36.0 -14.62 0.0345 29.79 24.10 0.628993 0.062899 1589 38.0 -16.45 0.0226 28.44 22.41 0.687958 0.068796 1453 40.0 -19.74 0.0106 27.24 20.86 0.730061 0.073006 1369 42.0 -25.61 0.0027 26.16 19.44 0.603389 0.060339 1657 44.0 -34.40 0.0004 25.20 18.13 0.377962 0.037796 2645 46.0 -29.69 0.0011 24.34 16.91 0.154114 0.015411 6488 48.0 -27.36 0.0018 23.56 15.76 0.055567 0.005557 17996 50.0 -27.38 0.0018 22.85 14.69 0.058781 0.005878 17012 52.0 -28.45 0.0014 22.22 13.68 0.063312 0.006331 15794 54.0 -30.39 0.0009 21.64 12.72 0.066444 0.006644 15050 56.0 -32.71 0.0005 21.12 11.81 0.060845 0.006084 16435 58.0 -32.17 0.0006 20.64 10.94 0.051675 0.005168 19351 60.0 -29.83 0.0010 20.22 10.11 0.058688 0.005869 17039 62.0 -28.63 0.0014 19.83 9.31 0.066413 0.006641 15057 64.0 -28.21 0.0015 19.48 8.54 0.072367 0.007237 13818 66.0 -27.79 0.0017 19.16 7.79 0.074326 0.007433 13454 68.0 -27.72 0.0017 18.88 7.07 0.076100 0.007610 13140 70.0 -28.67 0.0014 18.63 6.37 0.077708 0.007771 12868 72.0 -30.61 0.0009 18.41 5.69 0.076556 0.007656 13062 74.0 -32.63 0.0005 18.21 5.02 0.073869 0.007387 13537 76.0 -33.69 0.0004 18.04 4.37 0.052068 0.005207 19205 78.0 -34.49 0.0004 17.90 3.72 0.034272 0.003427 29178 80.0 -37.34 0.0002 17.78 3.09 0.024328 0.002433 41105 82.0 -44.09 0.0000 17.68 2.46 0.020216 0.002022 49466 84.0 -45.81 0.0000 17.60 1.84 0.014514 0.001451 68901 86.0 -41.56 0.0001 17.55 1.22 0.005481 0.000548 182451 88.0 -40.61 0.0001 17.52 0.61 0.005012 0.000501 199522 90.0 -44.30 0.0000 17.51 0.00 0.006877 0.000688 145409 160 29 of 41 Clearwire Westgate (Revised) 816226 Kathrein-Scala:84010054 Antenna Worksheet (280 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 355 Height (feet): 64 Frequency (MHz): 2500 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.03 0.9943 10030.91 10030.90 0.000118 0.000012 8500156 1.0 -0.25 0.9441 1003.14 1002.99 0.011763 0.001176 85010 2.0 -1.04 0.7870 501.65 501.34 0.047039 0.004704 21259 3.0 -2.41 0.5741 334.52 334.06 0.105784 0.010578 9453 4.0 -4.45 0.3589 250.98 250.37 0.187926 0.018793 5321 5.0 -7.22 0.1897 200.87 200.11 0.238196 0.023820 4198 6.0 -10.57 0.0877 167.49 166.57 0.286156 0.028616 3494 7.0 -13.00 0.0501 143.66 142.59 0.334292 0.033429 2991 8.0 -12.71 0.0536 125.79 124.57 0.382635 0.038264 2613 9.0 -11.58 0.0695 111.91 110.54 0.356820 0.035682 2802 10.0 -11.17 0.0764 100.82 99.29 0.240975 0.024098 4149 12.0 -13.50 0.0447 84.21 82.37 0.146497 0.014650 6826 14.0 -20.99 0.0080 72.37 70.22 0.198039 0.019804 5049 16.0 -19.11 0.0123 63.52 61.05 0.225475 0.022547 4435 18.0 -16.05 0.0248 56.65 53.88 0.111966 0.011197 8931 20.0 -17.47 0.0179 51.19 48.10 0.138808 0.013881 7204 22.0 -20.64 0.0086 46.73 43.33 0.164296 0.016430 6086 24.0 -19.93 0.0102 43.04 39.32 0.182570 0.018257 5477 26.0 -18.90 0.0129 39.94 35.90 0.205895 0.020589 4856 28.0 -18.44 0.0143 37.29 32.93 0.356662 0.035666 2803 30.0 -16.49 0.0224 35.01 30.32 0.458499 0.045850 2181 32.0 -14.58 0.0348 33.04 28.02 0.518384 0.051838 1929 34.0 -13.96 0.0402 31.31 25.96 0.570883 0.057088 1751 36.0 -14.62 0.0345 29.79 24.10 0.628993 0.062899 1589 38.0 -16.45 0.0226 28.44 22.41 0.697492 0.069749 1433 40.0 -19.74 0.0106 27.24 20.86 0.718798 0.071880 1391 42.0 -25.61 0.0027 26.16 19.44 0.603389 0.060339 1657 44.0 -34.40 0.0004 25.20 18.13 0.370901 0.037090 2696 46.0 -29.69 0.0011 24.34 16.91 0.154114 0.015411 6488 48.0 -27.36 0.0018 23.56 15.76 0.055567 0.005557 17996 50.0 -27.38 0.0018 22.85 14.69 0.060076 0.006008 16645 52.0 -28.45 0.0014 22.22 13.68 0.063312 0.006331 15794 54.0 -30.39 0.0009 21.64 12.72 0.064888 0.006489 15411 56.0 -32.71 0.0005 21.12 11.81 0.059351 0.005935 16848 58.0 -32.17 0.0006 20.64 10.94 0.053023 0.005302 18859 60.0 -29.83 0.0010 20.22 10.11 0.058688 0.005869 17039 62.0 -28.63 0.0014 19.83 9.31 0.066413 0.006641 15057 64.0 -28.21 0.0015 19.48 8.54 0.070321 0.007032 14220 66.0 -27.79 0.0017 19.16 7.79 0.072152 0.007215 13859 68.0 -27.72 0.0017 18.88 7.07 0.076100 0.007610 13140 70.0 -28.67 0.0014 18.63 6.37 0.075272 0.007527 13285 72.0 -30.61 0.0009 18.41 5.69 0.079145 0.007915 12635 74.0 -32.63 0.0005 18.21 5.02 0.073869 0.007387 13537 76.0 -33.69 0.0004 18.04 4.37 0.054021 0.005402 18511 78.0 -34.49 0.0004 17.90 3.72 0.034272 0.003427 29178 80.0 -37.34 0.0002 17.78 3.09 0.024328 0.002433 41105 82.0 -44.09 0.0000 17.68 2.46 0.021044 0.002104 47519 84.0 -45.81 0.0000 17.60 1.84 0.014514 0.001451 68901 86.0 -41.56 0.0001 17.55 1.22 0.005481 0.000548 182451 88.0 -40.61 0.0001 17.52 0.61 0.005012 0.000501 199522 90.0 -44.30 0.0000 17.51 0.00 0.006877 0.000688 145417 161 30 of 41 Sprint-Nextel Westgate (Revised) 816226 KMW:HB-X-AW-17-65-00T (PROPOSED) Antenna Worksheet (345 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 64 Frequency (MHz): 1900 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.01 0.9977 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000033 3017555 1.0 -0.10 0.9772 1003.14 1002.99 0.033136 0.003314 30178 2.0 -0.40 0.9120 501.65 501.34 0.132504 0.013250 7546 3.0 -1.30 0.7413 334.52 334.06 0.297982 0.029798 3355 4.0 -2.60 0.5495 250.98 250.37 0.529370 0.052937 1889 5.0 -4.10 0.3890 200.87 200.11 0.742025 0.074203 1347 6.0 -6.80 0.2089 167.49 166.57 0.891430 0.089143 1121 7.0 -9.60 0.1096 143.66 142.59 1.041383 0.104138 960 8.0 -15.20 0.0302 125.79 124.57 1.191981 0.119198 838 9.0 -24.70 0.0034 111.91 110.54 1.343320 0.134332 744 10.0 -22.80 0.0052 100.82 99.29 1.347673 0.134767 742 12.0 -14.10 0.0389 84.21 82.37 0.586719 0.058672 1704 14.0 -13.20 0.0479 72.37 70.22 0.371574 0.037157 2691 16.0 -16.00 0.0251 63.52 61.05 0.481655 0.048166 2076 18.0 -22.30 0.0059 56.65 53.88 0.603707 0.060371 1656 20.0 -23.00 0.0050 51.19 48.10 0.606797 0.060680 1647 22.0 -19.60 0.0110 46.73 43.33 0.280043 0.028004 3570 24.0 -19.10 0.0123 43.04 39.32 0.288661 0.028866 3464 26.0 -20.10 0.0098 39.94 35.90 0.334743 0.033474 2987 28.0 -20.90 0.0081 37.29 32.93 0.382290 0.038229 2615 30.0 -21.70 0.0068 35.01 30.32 0.379095 0.037909 2637 32.0 -24.30 0.0037 33.04 28.02 0.341322 0.034132 2929 34.0 -28.70 0.0013 31.31 25.96 0.623198 0.062320 1604 36.0 -23.40 0.0046 29.79 24.10 1.312615 0.131262 761 38.0 -18.30 0.0148 28.44 22.41 1.942892 0.194289 514 40.0 -15.30 0.0295 27.24 20.86 2.300182 0.230018 434 42.0 -13.90 0.0407 26.16 19.44 2.478950 0.247895 403 44.0 -13.50 0.0447 25.20 18.13 2.660476 0.266048 375 46.0 -14.00 0.0398 24.34 16.91 2.833664 0.283366 352 48.0 -15.40 0.0288 23.56 15.76 3.011604 0.301160 332 50.0 -17.40 0.0182 22.85 14.69 3.043440 0.304344 328 52.0 -20.00 0.0100 22.22 13.68 2.634281 0.263428 379 54.0 -23.40 0.0046 21.64 12.72 1.865495 0.186549 536 56.0 -27.80 0.0017 21.12 11.81 1.180602 0.118060 847 58.0 -33.40 0.0005 20.64 10.94 0.625678 0.062568 1598 60.0 -39.20 0.0001 20.22 10.11 0.277703 0.027770 3600 62.0 -41.50 0.0001 19.83 9.31 0.098846 0.009885 10116 64.0 -40.00 0.0001 19.48 8.54 0.031416 0.003142 31830 66.0 -38.00 0.0002 19.16 7.79 0.043739 0.004374 22862 68.0 -36.00 0.0003 18.88 7.07 0.050903 0.005090 19645 70.0 -34.60 0.0003 18.63 6.37 0.056492 0.005649 17701 72.0 -34.00 0.0004 18.41 5.69 0.061493 0.006149 16261 74.0 -33.60 0.0004 18.21 5.02 0.068055 0.006806 14693 76.0 -33.30 0.0005 18.04 4.37 0.074647 0.007465 13396 78.0 -32.90 0.0005 17.90 3.72 0.076906 0.007691 13002 80.0 -32.50 0.0006 17.78 3.09 0.077929 0.007793 12832 82.0 -32.50 0.0006 17.68 2.46 0.078173 0.007817 12792 84.0 -32.50 0.0006 17.60 1.84 0.078427 0.007843 12750 86.0 -32.60 0.0005 17.55 1.22 0.078393 0.007839 12756 88.0 -32.80 0.0005 17.52 0.61 0.076987 0.007699 12989 90.0 -33.40 0.0005 17.51 0.00 0.075995 0.007600 13158 162 31 of 41 Sprint-Nextel Westgate (Revised) 816226 KMW:HB-X-AW-17-65-00T (PROPOSED) Antenna Worksheet (135 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 64 Frequency (MHz): 1900 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.01 0.9977 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000033 3017555 1.0 -0.10 0.9772 1003.14 1002.99 0.033136 0.003314 30178 2.0 -0.40 0.9120 501.65 501.34 0.132504 0.013250 7546 3.0 -1.30 0.7413 334.52 334.06 0.297982 0.029798 3355 4.0 -2.60 0.5495 250.98 250.37 0.529370 0.052937 1889 5.0 -4.10 0.3890 200.87 200.11 0.742025 0.074203 1347 6.0 -6.80 0.2089 167.49 166.57 0.891430 0.089143 1121 7.0 -9.60 0.1096 143.66 142.59 1.041384 0.104138 960 8.0 -15.20 0.0302 125.79 124.57 1.191981 0.119198 838 9.0 -24.70 0.0034 111.91 110.54 1.343320 0.134332 744 10.0 -22.80 0.0052 100.82 99.29 1.347673 0.134767 742 12.0 -14.10 0.0389 84.21 82.37 0.586719 0.058672 1704 14.0 -13.20 0.0479 72.37 70.22 0.371574 0.037157 2691 16.0 -16.00 0.0251 63.52 61.05 0.481655 0.048166 2076 18.0 -22.30 0.0059 56.65 53.88 0.603707 0.060371 1656 20.0 -23.00 0.0050 51.19 48.10 0.607571 0.060757 1645 22.0 -19.60 0.0110 46.73 43.33 0.280043 0.028004 3570 24.0 -19.10 0.0123 43.04 39.32 0.289030 0.028903 3459 26.0 -20.10 0.0098 39.94 35.90 0.334743 0.033474 2987 28.0 -20.90 0.0081 37.29 32.93 0.382290 0.038229 2615 30.0 -21.70 0.0068 35.01 30.32 0.379095 0.037909 2637 32.0 -24.30 0.0037 33.04 28.02 0.341758 0.034176 2926 34.0 -28.70 0.0013 31.31 25.96 0.623198 0.062320 1604 36.0 -23.40 0.0046 29.79 24.10 1.314289 0.131429 760 38.0 -18.30 0.0148 28.44 22.41 1.945370 0.194537 514 40.0 -15.30 0.0295 27.24 20.86 2.300182 0.230018 434 42.0 -13.90 0.0407 26.16 19.44 2.478950 0.247895 403 44.0 -13.50 0.0447 25.20 18.13 2.657088 0.265709 376 46.0 -14.00 0.0398 24.34 16.91 2.833664 0.283366 352 48.0 -15.40 0.0288 23.56 15.76 3.007769 0.300777 332 50.0 -17.40 0.0182 22.85 14.69 3.043440 0.304344 328 52.0 -20.00 0.0100 22.22 13.68 2.630926 0.263093 380 54.0 -23.40 0.0046 21.64 12.72 1.863119 0.186312 536 56.0 -27.80 0.0017 21.12 11.81 1.180602 0.118060 847 58.0 -33.40 0.0005 20.64 10.94 0.625678 0.062568 1598 60.0 -39.20 0.0001 20.22 10.11 0.277703 0.027770 3600 62.0 -41.50 0.0001 19.83 9.31 0.098846 0.009885 10116 64.0 -40.00 0.0001 19.48 8.54 0.031416 0.003142 31830 66.0 -38.00 0.0002 19.16 7.79 0.043739 0.004374 22862 68.0 -36.00 0.0003 18.88 7.07 0.050903 0.005090 19645 70.0 -34.60 0.0003 18.63 6.37 0.056636 0.005664 17656 72.0 -34.00 0.0004 18.41 5.69 0.061493 0.006149 16261 74.0 -33.60 0.0004 18.21 5.02 0.068055 0.006806 14693 76.0 -33.30 0.0005 18.04 4.37 0.075029 0.007503 13328 78.0 -32.90 0.0005 17.90 3.72 0.077397 0.007740 12920 80.0 -32.50 0.0006 17.78 3.09 0.077929 0.007793 12832 82.0 -32.50 0.0006 17.68 2.46 0.078173 0.007817 12792 84.0 -32.50 0.0006 17.60 1.84 0.078427 0.007843 12750 86.0 -32.60 0.0005 17.55 1.22 0.078393 0.007839 12756 88.0 -32.80 0.0005 17.52 0.61 0.078074 0.007807 12808 90.0 -33.40 0.0005 17.51 0.00 0.075971 0.007597 13162 163 32 of 41 Sprint-Nextel Westgate (Revised) 816226 KMW:HB-X-AW-17-65-00T (PROPOSED) Antenna Worksheet (225 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 64 Frequency (MHz): 1900 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.01 0.9977 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000033 3017555 1.0 -0.10 0.9772 1003.14 1002.99 0.033136 0.003314 30178 2.0 -0.40 0.9120 501.65 501.34 0.132504 0.013250 7546 3.0 -1.30 0.7413 334.52 334.06 0.297982 0.029798 3355 4.0 -2.60 0.5495 250.98 250.37 0.529370 0.052937 1889 5.0 -4.10 0.3890 200.87 200.11 0.742025 0.074203 1347 6.0 -6.80 0.2089 167.49 166.57 0.891430 0.089143 1121 7.0 -9.60 0.1096 143.66 142.59 1.041384 0.104138 960 8.0 -15.20 0.0302 125.79 124.57 1.191981 0.119198 838 9.0 -24.70 0.0034 111.91 110.54 1.343320 0.134332 744 10.0 -22.80 0.0052 100.82 99.29 1.347673 0.134767 742 12.0 -14.10 0.0389 84.21 82.37 0.586719 0.058672 1704 14.0 -13.20 0.0479 72.37 70.22 0.371574 0.037157 2691 16.0 -16.00 0.0251 63.52 61.05 0.481655 0.048166 2076 18.0 -22.30 0.0059 56.65 53.88 0.603707 0.060371 1656 20.0 -23.00 0.0050 51.19 48.10 0.607571 0.060757 1645 22.0 -19.60 0.0110 46.73 43.33 0.280043 0.028004 3570 24.0 -19.10 0.0123 43.04 39.32 0.289030 0.028903 3459 26.0 -20.10 0.0098 39.94 35.90 0.334743 0.033474 2987 28.0 -20.90 0.0081 37.29 32.93 0.382290 0.038229 2615 30.0 -21.70 0.0068 35.01 30.32 0.379095 0.037909 2637 32.0 -24.30 0.0037 33.04 28.02 0.341758 0.034176 2926 34.0 -28.70 0.0013 31.31 25.96 0.623198 0.062320 1604 36.0 -23.40 0.0046 29.79 24.10 1.314289 0.131429 760 38.0 -18.30 0.0148 28.44 22.41 1.945370 0.194537 514 40.0 -15.30 0.0295 27.24 20.86 2.300182 0.230018 434 42.0 -13.90 0.0407 26.16 19.44 2.478950 0.247895 403 44.0 -13.50 0.0447 25.20 18.13 2.657088 0.265709 376 46.0 -14.00 0.0398 24.34 16.91 2.833664 0.283366 352 48.0 -15.40 0.0288 23.56 15.76 3.007769 0.300777 332 50.0 -17.40 0.0182 22.85 14.69 3.043440 0.304344 328 52.0 -20.00 0.0100 22.22 13.68 2.630926 0.263093 380 54.0 -23.40 0.0046 21.64 12.72 1.863119 0.186312 536 56.0 -27.80 0.0017 21.12 11.81 1.180602 0.118060 847 58.0 -33.40 0.0005 20.64 10.94 0.625678 0.062568 1598 60.0 -39.20 0.0001 20.22 10.11 0.277703 0.027770 3600 62.0 -41.50 0.0001 19.83 9.31 0.098846 0.009885 10116 64.0 -40.00 0.0001 19.48 8.54 0.031416 0.003142 31830 66.0 -38.00 0.0002 19.16 7.79 0.043739 0.004374 22862 68.0 -36.00 0.0003 18.88 7.07 0.050903 0.005090 19645 70.0 -34.60 0.0003 18.63 6.37 0.056636 0.005664 17656 72.0 -34.00 0.0004 18.41 5.69 0.061493 0.006149 16261 74.0 -33.60 0.0004 18.21 5.02 0.068055 0.006806 14693 76.0 -33.30 0.0005 18.04 4.37 0.075029 0.007503 13328 78.0 -32.90 0.0005 17.90 3.72 0.077397 0.007740 12920 80.0 -32.50 0.0006 17.78 3.09 0.077929 0.007793 12832 82.0 -32.50 0.0006 17.68 2.46 0.078173 0.007817 12792 84.0 -32.50 0.0006 17.60 1.84 0.078427 0.007843 12750 86.0 -32.60 0.0005 17.55 1.22 0.078393 0.007839 12756 88.0 -32.80 0.0005 17.52 0.61 0.078074 0.007807 12808 90.0 -33.40 0.0005 17.51 0.00 0.074815 0.007482 13366 164 33 of 41 Verizon Wireless Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:LNX-6512DS Antenna Worksheet (40 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 500.67 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 58 Frequency (MHz): 751 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.21 0.9537 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000066 1510788 1.0 -0.08 0.9817 1003.11 1002.99 0.033138 0.006619 15108 2.0 -0.01 0.9977 501.59 501.34 0.132536 0.026472 3777 3.0 0.00 1.0000 334.43 334.06 0.298144 0.059549 1679 4.0 -0.06 0.9863 250.86 250.37 0.529881 0.105835 944 5.0 -0.18 0.9594 200.72 200.11 0.827630 0.165306 604 6.0 -0.38 0.9162 167.31 166.57 1.191242 0.237931 420 7.0 -0.64 0.8630 143.44 142.59 1.620535 0.323675 308 8.0 -0.97 0.7998 125.55 124.57 2.115290 0.422495 236 9.0 -1.37 0.7295 111.64 110.54 2.672692 0.533827 187 10.0 -1.83 0.6561 100.52 99.29 3.064196 0.612023 163 12.0 -3.02 0.4989 83.84 82.37 3.693791 0.737774 135 14.0 -4.52 0.3532 71.95 70.22 4.332802 0.865407 115 16.0 -6.39 0.2296 63.04 61.05 4.983038 0.995281 100 18.0 -8.79 0.1321 56.12 53.88 5.646429 1.127782 88 20.0 -11.85 0.0653 50.59 48.10 5.755593 1.149586 86 22.0 -16.05 0.0248 46.08 43.33 4.949248 0.988532 101 24.0 -22.46 0.0057 42.33 39.32 3.852445 0.769463 129 26.0 -31.42 0.0007 39.17 35.90 2.666721 0.532634 187 28.0 -24.65 0.0034 36.47 32.93 1.566300 0.312843 319 30.0 -20.59 0.0087 34.14 30.32 0.711174 0.142045 704 32.0 -18.77 0.0133 32.11 28.02 0.604557 0.120750 828 34.0 -18.09 0.0155 30.32 25.96 0.712481 0.142306 702 36.0 -18.12 0.0154 28.75 24.10 0.789565 0.157703 634 38.0 -18.71 0.0135 27.35 22.41 0.868854 0.173539 576 40.0 -19.85 0.0104 26.10 20.86 0.951916 0.190130 525 42.0 -21.44 0.0072 24.98 19.44 1.034544 0.206633 483 44.0 -23.60 0.0044 23.97 18.13 1.099560 0.219619 455 46.0 -26.30 0.0023 23.06 16.91 1.050529 0.209826 476 48.0 -30.00 0.0010 22.23 15.76 0.880995 0.175964 568 50.0 -35.45 0.0003 21.49 14.69 0.667181 0.133258 750 52.0 -43.69 0.0000 20.81 13.68 0.442444 0.088371 1131 54.0 -41.32 0.0001 20.19 12.72 0.257238 0.051379 1946 56.0 -36.72 0.0002 19.63 11.81 0.118148 0.023598 4237 58.0 -34.74 0.0003 19.12 10.94 0.049609 0.009909 10092 60.0 -34.09 0.0004 18.65 10.11 0.053310 0.010648 9391 62.0 -34.11 0.0004 18.23 9.31 0.055305 0.011046 9052 64.0 -34.34 0.0004 17.85 8.54 0.057623 0.011509 8688 66.0 -34.83 0.0003 17.51 7.79 0.059397 0.011864 8429 68.0 -35.34 0.0003 17.20 7.07 0.060185 0.012021 8318 70.0 -36.25 0.0002 16.92 6.37 0.061194 0.012222 8181 72.0 -37.15 0.0002 16.68 5.69 0.055160 0.011017 9076 74.0 -37.18 0.0002 16.46 5.02 0.052563 0.010499 9525 76.0 -36.96 0.0002 16.27 4.37 0.042909 0.008570 11668 78.0 -36.63 0.0002 16.11 3.72 0.040751 0.008139 12286 80.0 -36.30 0.0002 15.98 3.09 0.042970 0.008582 11651 82.0 -36.26 0.0002 15.87 2.46 0.044102 0.008809 11352 84.0 -36.02 0.0003 15.79 1.84 0.043923 0.008773 11398 86.0 -36.01 0.0003 15.73 1.22 0.043715 0.008731 11453 88.0 -36.14 0.0002 15.69 0.61 0.044964 0.008981 11134 90.0 -36.58 0.0002 15.68 0.00 0.042963 0.008581 11653 165 34 of 41 Verizon Wireless Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:LNX-6512DS Antenna Worksheet (160 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 500.67 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 58 Frequency (MHz): 751 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.21 0.9537 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000066 1510788 1.0 -0.08 0.9817 1003.11 1002.99 0.033138 0.006619 15108 2.0 -0.01 0.9977 501.59 501.34 0.132536 0.026472 3777 3.0 0.00 1.0000 334.43 334.06 0.298144 0.059549 1679 4.0 -0.06 0.9863 250.86 250.37 0.529881 0.105835 944 5.0 -0.18 0.9594 200.72 200.11 0.827630 0.165306 604 6.0 -0.38 0.9162 167.31 166.57 1.191242 0.237931 420 7.0 -0.64 0.8630 143.44 142.59 1.620535 0.323675 308 8.0 -0.97 0.7998 125.55 124.57 2.115290 0.422495 236 9.0 -1.37 0.7295 111.64 110.54 2.672717 0.533832 187 10.0 -1.83 0.6561 100.52 99.29 3.064196 0.612023 163 12.0 -3.02 0.4989 83.84 82.37 3.693791 0.737774 135 14.0 -4.52 0.3532 71.95 70.22 4.332802 0.865407 115 16.0 -6.39 0.2296 63.04 61.05 4.983038 0.995281 100 18.0 -8.79 0.1321 56.12 53.88 5.646429 1.127782 88 20.0 -11.85 0.0653 50.59 48.10 5.751929 1.148854 87 22.0 -16.05 0.0248 46.08 43.33 4.949247 0.988531 101 24.0 -22.46 0.0057 42.33 39.32 3.855627 0.770099 129 26.0 -31.42 0.0007 39.17 35.90 2.669102 0.533110 187 28.0 -24.65 0.0034 36.47 32.93 1.566300 0.312843 319 30.0 -20.59 0.0087 34.14 30.32 0.711868 0.142184 703 32.0 -18.77 0.0133 32.11 28.02 0.604557 0.120750 828 34.0 -18.09 0.0155 30.32 25.96 0.713505 0.142511 701 36.0 -18.12 0.0154 28.75 24.10 0.789565 0.157703 634 38.0 -18.71 0.0135 27.35 22.41 0.868854 0.173539 576 40.0 -19.85 0.0104 26.10 20.86 0.951916 0.190130 525 42.0 -21.44 0.0072 24.98 19.44 1.034544 0.206633 483 44.0 -23.60 0.0044 23.97 18.13 1.099560 0.219619 455 46.0 -26.30 0.0023 23.06 16.91 1.047096 0.209140 478 48.0 -30.00 0.0010 22.23 15.76 0.880995 0.175964 568 50.0 -35.45 0.0003 21.49 14.69 0.667180 0.133258 750 52.0 -43.69 0.0000 20.81 13.68 0.444467 0.088775 1126 54.0 -41.32 0.0001 20.19 12.72 0.258518 0.051635 1936 56.0 -36.72 0.0002 19.63 11.81 0.118798 0.023728 4214 58.0 -34.74 0.0003 19.12 10.94 0.049305 0.009848 10154 60.0 -34.09 0.0004 18.65 10.11 0.053310 0.010648 9391 62.0 -34.11 0.0004 18.23 9.31 0.055305 0.011046 9052 64.0 -34.34 0.0004 17.85 8.54 0.057623 0.011509 8688 66.0 -34.83 0.0003 17.51 7.79 0.059397 0.011864 8429 68.0 -35.34 0.0003 17.20 7.07 0.060822 0.012148 8231 70.0 -36.25 0.0002 16.92 6.37 0.061956 0.012375 8080 72.0 -37.15 0.0002 16.68 5.69 0.055160 0.011017 9076 74.0 -37.18 0.0002 16.46 5.02 0.052563 0.010499 9525 76.0 -36.96 0.0002 16.27 4.37 0.042072 0.008403 11900 78.0 -36.63 0.0002 16.11 3.72 0.041687 0.008326 12010 80.0 -36.30 0.0002 15.98 3.09 0.042970 0.008582 11651 82.0 -36.26 0.0002 15.87 2.46 0.042858 0.008560 11682 84.0 -36.02 0.0003 15.79 1.84 0.043923 0.008773 11398 86.0 -36.01 0.0003 15.73 1.22 0.045195 0.009027 11077 88.0 -36.14 0.0002 15.69 0.61 0.044964 0.008981 11134 90.0 -36.58 0.0002 15.68 0.00 0.044643 0.008917 11214 166 35 of 41 Verizon Wireless Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:LNX-6512DS Antenna Worksheet (280 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 500.67 ERP (Watts): 1000 Height (feet): 58 Frequency (MHz): 751 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.21 0.9537 10030.91 10030.90 0.000331 0.000066 1510788 1.0 -0.08 0.9817 1003.11 1002.99 0.033138 0.006619 15108 2.0 -0.01 0.9977 501.59 501.34 0.132536 0.026472 3777 3.0 0.00 1.0000 334.43 334.06 0.298144 0.059549 1679 4.0 -0.06 0.9863 250.86 250.37 0.529881 0.105835 944 5.0 -0.18 0.9594 200.72 200.11 0.827630 0.165306 604 6.0 -0.38 0.9162 167.31 166.57 1.191242 0.237931 420 7.0 -0.64 0.8630 143.44 142.59 1.620535 0.323675 308 8.0 -0.97 0.7998 125.55 124.57 2.115290 0.422495 236 9.0 -1.37 0.7295 111.64 110.54 2.672692 0.533827 187 10.0 -1.83 0.6561 100.52 99.29 3.064196 0.612023 163 12.0 -3.02 0.4989 83.84 82.37 3.693791 0.737774 135 14.0 -4.52 0.3532 71.95 70.22 4.332802 0.865407 115 16.0 -6.39 0.2296 63.04 61.05 4.983038 0.995281 100 18.0 -8.79 0.1321 56.12 53.88 5.646429 1.127782 88 20.0 -11.85 0.0653 50.59 48.10 5.751927 1.148854 87 22.0 -16.05 0.0248 46.08 43.33 4.949247 0.988531 101 24.0 -22.46 0.0057 42.33 39.32 3.855626 0.770098 129 26.0 -31.42 0.0007 39.17 35.90 2.666723 0.532634 187 28.0 -24.65 0.0034 36.47 32.93 1.566300 0.312843 319 30.0 -20.59 0.0087 34.14 30.32 0.711867 0.142184 703 32.0 -18.77 0.0133 32.11 28.02 0.603846 0.120608 829 34.0 -18.09 0.0155 30.32 25.96 0.713505 0.142511 701 36.0 -18.12 0.0154 28.75 24.10 0.790874 0.157964 633 38.0 -18.71 0.0135 27.35 22.41 0.868854 0.173539 576 40.0 -19.85 0.0104 26.10 20.86 0.951916 0.190130 525 42.0 -21.44 0.0072 24.98 19.44 1.031926 0.206110 485 44.0 -23.60 0.0044 23.97 18.13 1.099560 0.219619 455 46.0 -26.30 0.0023 23.06 16.91 1.050529 0.209826 476 48.0 -30.00 0.0010 22.23 15.76 0.884430 0.176650 566 50.0 -35.45 0.0003 21.49 14.69 0.667180 0.133258 750 52.0 -43.69 0.0000 20.81 13.68 0.442444 0.088371 1131 54.0 -41.32 0.0001 20.19 12.72 0.258518 0.051635 1936 56.0 -36.72 0.0002 19.63 11.81 0.118797 0.023728 4214 58.0 -34.74 0.0003 19.12 10.94 0.049305 0.009848 10154 60.0 -34.09 0.0004 18.65 10.11 0.053666 0.010719 9329 62.0 -34.11 0.0004 18.23 9.31 0.055710 0.011127 8987 64.0 -34.34 0.0004 17.85 8.54 0.057623 0.011509 8688 66.0 -34.83 0.0003 17.51 7.79 0.059397 0.011864 8429 68.0 -35.34 0.0003 17.20 7.07 0.060185 0.012021 8318 70.0 -36.25 0.0002 16.92 6.37 0.061956 0.012375 8080 72.0 -37.15 0.0002 16.68 5.69 0.055160 0.011017 9076 74.0 -37.18 0.0002 16.46 5.02 0.051687 0.010324 9686 76.0 -36.96 0.0002 16.27 4.37 0.042072 0.008403 11900 78.0 -36.63 0.0002 16.11 3.72 0.040751 0.008139 12286 80.0 -36.30 0.0002 15.98 3.09 0.041871 0.008363 11957 82.0 -36.26 0.0002 15.87 2.46 0.042858 0.008560 11682 84.0 -36.02 0.0003 15.79 1.84 0.045290 0.009046 11054 86.0 -36.01 0.0003 15.73 1.22 0.043715 0.008731 11453 88.0 -36.14 0.0002 15.69 0.61 0.043407 0.008670 11534 90.0 -36.58 0.0002 15.68 0.00 0.044643 0.008917 11214 167 36 of 41 Verizon Wireless Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:932DG65VTE Antenna Worksheet (40 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 2000 Height (feet): 58 Frequency (MHz): 1900 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.03 0.9931 10030.91 10030.90 0.000663 0.000066 1508776 1.0 -0.30 0.9333 1003.11 1002.99 0.066276 0.006628 15088 2.0 -1.00 0.7943 501.59 501.34 0.265072 0.026507 3772 3.0 -2.30 0.5888 334.43 334.06 0.596288 0.059629 1677 4.0 -4.30 0.3715 250.86 250.37 1.059762 0.105976 943 5.0 -7.30 0.1862 200.72 200.11 1.433322 0.143332 697 6.0 -11.80 0.0661 167.31 166.57 1.721917 0.172192 580 7.0 -22.20 0.0060 143.44 142.59 2.011572 0.201157 497 8.0 -20.80 0.0083 125.55 124.57 2.302473 0.230247 434 9.0 -15.50 0.0282 111.64 110.54 2.594803 0.259480 385 10.0 -13.00 0.0501 100.52 99.29 2.630095 0.263009 380 12.0 -13.40 0.0457 83.84 82.37 0.911749 0.091175 1096 14.0 -17.80 0.0166 71.95 70.22 0.839062 0.083906 1191 16.0 -17.10 0.0195 63.04 61.05 1.091497 0.109150 916 18.0 -14.70 0.0339 56.12 53.88 1.319185 0.131919 758 20.0 -15.80 0.0263 50.59 48.10 1.071847 0.107185 932 22.0 -21.10 0.0078 46.08 43.33 1.290161 0.129016 775 24.0 -31.50 0.0007 42.33 39.32 1.517041 0.151704 659 26.0 -25.50 0.0028 39.17 35.90 1.744569 0.174457 573 28.0 -20.90 0.0081 36.47 32.93 1.491444 0.149144 670 30.0 -16.50 0.0224 34.14 30.32 2.507102 0.250710 398 32.0 -13.40 0.0457 32.11 28.02 4.348991 0.434899 229 34.0 -11.90 0.0646 30.32 25.96 5.561998 0.556200 179 36.0 -12.00 0.0631 28.75 24.10 6.163025 0.616302 162 38.0 -13.50 0.0447 27.35 22.41 6.774569 0.677457 147 40.0 -16.60 0.0219 26.10 20.86 7.466304 0.746630 133 42.0 -21.50 0.0071 24.98 19.44 8.108397 0.810840 123 44.0 -30.10 0.0010 23.97 18.13 8.285000 0.828500 120 46.0 -31.70 0.0007 23.06 16.91 6.592021 0.659202 151 48.0 -29.70 0.0011 22.23 15.76 3.660715 0.366071 273 50.0 -30.60 0.0009 21.49 14.69 1.374299 0.137430 727 52.0 -36.70 0.0002 20.81 13.68 0.250852 0.025085 3986 54.0 -40.00 0.0001 20.19 12.72 0.238315 0.023831 4196 56.0 -34.20 0.0004 19.63 11.81 0.250050 0.025005 3999 58.0 -31.10 0.0008 19.12 10.94 0.250963 0.025096 3984 60.0 -29.20 0.0012 18.65 10.11 0.368609 0.036861 2712 62.0 -27.90 0.0016 18.23 9.31 0.461479 0.046148 2166 64.0 -27.30 0.0019 17.85 8.54 0.494990 0.049499 2020 66.0 -27.60 0.0017 17.51 7.79 0.509420 0.050942 1963 68.0 -28.30 0.0015 17.20 7.07 0.520081 0.052008 1922 70.0 -29.60 0.0011 16.92 6.37 0.531655 0.053165 1880 72.0 -31.20 0.0008 16.68 5.69 0.518709 0.051871 1927 74.0 -33.60 0.0004 16.46 5.02 0.474627 0.047463 2106 76.0 -36.00 0.0003 16.27 4.37 0.373148 0.037315 2679 78.0 -38.00 0.0002 16.11 3.72 0.255940 0.025594 3907 80.0 -37.40 0.0002 15.98 3.09 0.149384 0.014938 6694 82.0 -36.40 0.0002 15.87 2.46 0.090734 0.009073 11021 84.0 -35.70 0.0003 15.79 1.84 0.090884 0.009088 11003 86.0 -36.00 0.0003 15.73 1.22 0.090399 0.009040 11062 88.0 -36.40 0.0002 15.69 0.61 0.088584 0.008858 11288 90.0 -37.00 0.0002 15.68 0.00 0.086395 0.008640 11574 168 37 of 41 Verizon Wireless Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:932DG65VTE Antenna Worksheet (160 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 2000 Height (feet): 58 Frequency (MHz): 1900 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.03 0.9931 10030.91 10030.90 0.000663 0.000066 1508776 1.0 -0.30 0.9333 1003.11 1002.99 0.066276 0.006628 15088 2.0 -1.00 0.7943 501.59 501.34 0.265072 0.026507 3772 3.0 -2.30 0.5888 334.43 334.06 0.596288 0.059629 1677 4.0 -4.30 0.3715 250.86 250.37 1.059761 0.105976 943 5.0 -7.30 0.1862 200.72 200.11 1.433322 0.143332 697 6.0 -11.80 0.0661 167.31 166.57 1.721916 0.172192 580 7.0 -22.20 0.0060 143.44 142.59 2.011572 0.201157 497 8.0 -20.80 0.0083 125.55 124.57 2.302473 0.230247 434 9.0 -15.50 0.0282 111.64 110.54 2.594803 0.259480 385 10.0 -13.00 0.0501 100.52 99.29 2.626745 0.262674 380 12.0 -13.40 0.0457 83.84 82.37 0.911749 0.091175 1096 14.0 -17.80 0.0166 71.95 70.22 0.839062 0.083906 1191 16.0 -17.10 0.0195 63.04 61.05 1.091497 0.109150 916 18.0 -14.70 0.0339 56.12 53.88 1.324239 0.132424 755 20.0 -15.80 0.0263 50.59 48.10 1.067684 0.106768 936 22.0 -21.10 0.0078 46.08 43.33 1.290161 0.129016 775 24.0 -31.50 0.0007 42.33 39.32 1.524794 0.152479 655 26.0 -25.50 0.0028 39.17 35.90 1.753484 0.175348 570 28.0 -20.90 0.0081 36.47 32.93 1.491444 0.149144 670 30.0 -16.50 0.0224 34.14 30.32 2.523129 0.252313 396 32.0 -13.40 0.0457 32.11 28.02 4.348991 0.434899 229 34.0 -11.90 0.0646 30.32 25.96 5.604689 0.560469 178 36.0 -12.00 0.0631 28.75 24.10 6.163025 0.616302 162 38.0 -13.50 0.0447 27.35 22.41 6.774570 0.677457 147 40.0 -16.60 0.0219 26.10 20.86 7.466304 0.746630 133 42.0 -21.50 0.0071 24.98 19.44 8.108397 0.810840 123 44.0 -30.10 0.0010 23.97 18.13 8.285002 0.828500 120 46.0 -31.70 0.0007 23.06 16.91 6.533479 0.653348 153 48.0 -29.70 0.0011 22.23 15.76 3.660715 0.366071 273 50.0 -30.60 0.0009 21.49 14.69 1.374296 0.137430 727 52.0 -36.70 0.0002 20.81 13.68 0.252810 0.025281 3955 54.0 -40.00 0.0001 20.19 12.72 0.240160 0.024016 4163 56.0 -34.20 0.0004 19.63 11.81 0.251970 0.025197 3968 58.0 -31.10 0.0008 19.12 10.94 0.249052 0.024905 4015 60.0 -29.20 0.0012 18.65 10.11 0.368609 0.036861 2712 62.0 -27.90 0.0016 18.23 9.31 0.461479 0.046148 2166 64.0 -27.30 0.0019 17.85 8.54 0.494990 0.049499 2020 66.0 -27.60 0.0017 17.51 7.79 0.509420 0.050942 1963 68.0 -28.30 0.0015 17.20 7.07 0.522551 0.052255 1913 70.0 -29.60 0.0011 16.92 6.37 0.534973 0.053497 1869 72.0 -31.20 0.0008 16.68 5.69 0.518709 0.051871 1927 74.0 -33.60 0.0004 16.46 5.02 0.474627 0.047463 2106 76.0 -36.00 0.0003 16.27 4.37 0.372408 0.037241 2685 78.0 -38.00 0.0002 16.11 3.72 0.256151 0.025615 3903 80.0 -37.40 0.0002 15.98 3.09 0.149384 0.014938 6694 82.0 -36.40 0.0002 15.87 2.46 0.091082 0.009108 10979 84.0 -35.70 0.0003 15.79 1.84 0.090884 0.009088 11003 86.0 -36.00 0.0003 15.73 1.22 0.089711 0.008971 11146 88.0 -36.40 0.0002 15.69 0.61 0.088584 0.008858 11288 90.0 -37.00 0.0002 15.68 0.00 0.085218 0.008522 11734 169 38 of 41 Verizon Wireless Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:932DG65VTE Antenna Worksheet (280 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 1000 ERP (Watts): 2000 Height (feet): 58 Frequency (MHz): 1900 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.03 0.9931 10030.91 10030.90 0.000663 0.000066 1508776 1.0 -0.30 0.9333 1003.11 1002.99 0.066276 0.006628 15088 2.0 -1.00 0.7943 501.59 501.34 0.265072 0.026507 3772 3.0 -2.30 0.5888 334.43 334.06 0.596288 0.059629 1677 4.0 -4.30 0.3715 250.86 250.37 1.059761 0.105976 943 5.0 -7.30 0.1862 200.72 200.11 1.433322 0.143332 697 6.0 -11.80 0.0661 167.31 166.57 1.721917 0.172192 580 7.0 -22.20 0.0060 143.44 142.59 2.011572 0.201157 497 8.0 -20.80 0.0083 125.55 124.57 2.302473 0.230247 434 9.0 -15.50 0.0282 111.64 110.54 2.594803 0.259480 385 10.0 -13.00 0.0501 100.52 99.29 2.630094 0.263009 380 12.0 -13.40 0.0457 83.84 82.37 0.914076 0.091408 1094 14.0 -17.80 0.0166 71.95 70.22 0.839062 0.083906 1191 16.0 -17.10 0.0195 63.04 61.05 1.091497 0.109150 916 18.0 -14.70 0.0339 56.12 53.88 1.324239 0.132424 755 20.0 -15.80 0.0263 50.59 48.10 1.067684 0.106768 936 22.0 -21.10 0.0078 46.08 43.33 1.290161 0.129016 775 24.0 -31.50 0.0007 42.33 39.32 1.524794 0.152479 655 26.0 -25.50 0.0028 39.17 35.90 1.744569 0.174457 573 28.0 -20.90 0.0081 36.47 32.93 1.491444 0.149144 670 30.0 -16.50 0.0224 34.14 30.32 2.523129 0.252313 396 32.0 -13.40 0.0457 32.11 28.02 4.315866 0.431587 231 34.0 -11.90 0.0646 30.32 25.96 5.604688 0.560469 178 36.0 -12.00 0.0631 28.75 24.10 6.210330 0.621033 161 38.0 -13.50 0.0447 27.35 22.41 6.774569 0.677457 147 40.0 -16.60 0.0219 26.10 20.86 7.466305 0.746630 133 42.0 -21.50 0.0071 24.98 19.44 8.046638 0.804664 124 44.0 -30.10 0.0010 23.97 18.13 8.285002 0.828500 120 46.0 -31.70 0.0007 23.06 16.91 6.592022 0.659202 151 48.0 -29.70 0.0011 22.23 15.76 3.693511 0.369351 270 50.0 -30.60 0.0009 21.49 14.69 1.374296 0.137430 727 52.0 -36.70 0.0002 20.81 13.68 0.250852 0.025085 3986 54.0 -40.00 0.0001 20.19 12.72 0.240160 0.024016 4163 56.0 -34.20 0.0004 19.63 11.81 0.251970 0.025197 3968 58.0 -31.10 0.0008 19.12 10.94 0.249052 0.024905 4015 60.0 -29.20 0.0012 18.65 10.11 0.371438 0.037144 2692 62.0 -27.90 0.0016 18.23 9.31 0.464429 0.046443 2153 64.0 -27.30 0.0019 17.85 8.54 0.494990 0.049499 2020 66.0 -27.60 0.0017 17.51 7.79 0.509420 0.050942 1963 68.0 -28.30 0.0015 17.20 7.07 0.520081 0.052008 1922 70.0 -29.60 0.0011 16.92 6.37 0.534973 0.053497 1869 72.0 -31.20 0.0008 16.68 5.69 0.518709 0.051871 1927 74.0 -33.60 0.0004 16.46 5.02 0.473418 0.047342 2112 76.0 -36.00 0.0003 16.27 4.37 0.372408 0.037241 2685 78.0 -38.00 0.0002 16.11 3.72 0.255940 0.025594 3907 80.0 -37.40 0.0002 15.98 3.09 0.149713 0.014971 6679 82.0 -36.40 0.0002 15.87 2.46 0.091082 0.009108 10979 84.0 -35.70 0.0003 15.79 1.84 0.090351 0.009035 11067 86.0 -36.00 0.0003 15.73 1.22 0.090399 0.009040 11062 88.0 -36.40 0.0002 15.69 0.61 0.089290 0.008929 11199 90.0 -37.00 0.0002 15.68 0.00 0.085140 0.008514 11745 170 39 of 41 Verizon Wireless Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:LBX-6513DS-VTM Antenna Worksheet (40 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 566.67 ERP (Watts): 2000 Height (feet): 58 Frequency (MHz): 850 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.01 0.9988 10030.91 10030.90 0.000663 0.000117 854973 1.0 -0.05 0.9886 1003.11 1002.99 0.066276 0.011696 8550 2.0 -0.21 0.9528 501.59 501.34 0.265072 0.046777 2137 3.0 -0.46 0.8995 334.43 334.06 0.596288 0.105227 950 4.0 -0.86 0.8204 250.86 250.37 1.059762 0.187017 534 5.0 -1.35 0.7328 200.72 200.11 1.655259 0.292105 342 6.0 -1.96 0.6368 167.31 166.57 2.372772 0.418724 238 7.0 -2.74 0.5321 143.44 142.59 3.175627 0.560405 178 8.0 -3.62 0.4345 125.55 124.57 3.970364 0.700652 142 9.0 -4.73 0.3365 111.64 110.54 4.474457 0.789610 126 10.0 -6.02 0.2500 100.52 99.29 4.981345 0.879061 113 12.0 -9.37 0.1156 83.84 82.37 6.004852 1.059680 94 14.0 -14.51 0.0354 71.95 70.22 6.347669 1.120177 89 16.0 -24.91 0.0032 63.04 61.05 5.362759 0.946369 105 18.0 -26.39 0.0023 56.12 53.88 3.775535 0.666271 150 20.0 -18.43 0.0144 50.59 48.10 2.017485 0.356027 280 22.0 -15.93 0.0255 46.08 43.33 1.140246 0.201220 496 24.0 -15.35 0.0292 42.33 39.32 1.321211 0.233155 428 26.0 -16.05 0.0248 39.17 35.90 1.538955 0.271580 368 28.0 -17.89 0.0163 36.47 32.93 1.770085 0.312368 320 30.0 -21.25 0.0075 34.14 30.32 2.013352 0.355297 281 32.0 -27.75 0.0017 32.11 28.02 2.245390 0.396245 252 34.0 -40.00 0.0001 30.32 25.96 2.128910 0.375690 266 36.0 -27.03 0.0020 28.75 24.10 1.591906 0.280925 355 38.0 -22.46 0.0057 27.35 22.41 0.884012 0.156002 641 40.0 -20.27 0.0094 26.10 20.86 1.285202 0.226800 440 42.0 -19.41 0.0115 24.98 19.44 1.554618 0.274344 364 44.0 -19.37 0.0116 23.97 18.13 1.684375 0.297243 336 46.0 -20.04 0.0099 23.06 16.91 1.810101 0.319430 313 48.0 -21.24 0.0075 22.23 15.76 1.930616 0.340697 293 50.0 -23.06 0.0049 21.49 14.69 2.053698 0.362417 275 52.0 -25.45 0.0029 20.81 13.68 2.141171 0.377854 264 54.0 -28.84 0.0013 20.19 12.72 1.957215 0.345391 289 56.0 -33.54 0.0004 19.63 11.81 1.573341 0.277648 360 58.0 -40.00 0.0001 19.12 10.94 1.090765 0.192488 519 60.0 -40.00 0.0001 18.65 10.11 0.645604 0.113930 877 62.0 -37.01 0.0002 18.23 9.31 0.298544 0.052684 1898 64.0 -33.73 0.0004 17.85 8.54 0.162042 0.028596 3497 66.0 -31.95 0.0006 17.51 7.79 0.215840 0.038089 2625 68.0 -31.10 0.0008 17.20 7.07 0.235426 0.041546 2406 70.0 -30.95 0.0008 16.92 6.37 0.242743 0.042837 2334 72.0 -30.99 0.0008 16.68 5.69 0.247596 0.043693 2288 74.0 -31.46 0.0007 16.46 5.02 0.253713 0.044773 2233 76.0 -32.34 0.0006 16.27 4.37 0.257480 0.045438 2200 78.0 -33.28 0.0005 16.11 3.72 0.255890 0.045157 2214 80.0 -34.82 0.0003 15.98 3.09 0.236632 0.041759 2394 82.0 -36.50 0.0002 15.87 2.46 0.193517 0.034150 2928 84.0 -38.57 0.0001 15.79 1.84 0.147793 0.026081 3834 86.0 -40.00 0.0001 15.73 1.22 0.101260 0.017869 5596 88.0 -40.00 0.0001 15.69 0.61 0.066652 0.011762 8501 90.0 -40.00 0.0001 15.68 0.00 0.036398 0.006423 15568 171 40 of 41 Verizon Wireless Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:LBX-6513DS-VTM Antenna Worksheet (160 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 566.67 ERP (Watts): 2000 Height (feet): 58 Frequency (MHz): 850 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.01 0.9988 10030.91 10030.90 0.000663 0.000117 854973 1.0 -0.05 0.9886 1003.11 1002.99 0.066276 0.011696 8550 2.0 -0.21 0.9528 501.59 501.34 0.265072 0.046777 2137 3.0 -0.46 0.8995 334.43 334.06 0.596288 0.105227 950 4.0 -0.86 0.8204 250.86 250.37 1.059761 0.187017 534 5.0 -1.35 0.7328 200.72 200.11 1.655259 0.292105 342 6.0 -1.96 0.6368 167.31 166.57 2.372772 0.418724 238 7.0 -2.74 0.5321 143.44 142.59 3.175627 0.560405 178 8.0 -3.62 0.4345 125.55 124.57 3.970364 0.700652 142 9.0 -4.73 0.3365 111.64 110.54 4.474457 0.789610 126 10.0 -6.02 0.2500 100.52 99.29 4.981345 0.879061 113 12.0 -9.37 0.1156 83.84 82.37 6.004852 1.059680 94 14.0 -14.51 0.0354 71.95 70.22 6.347669 1.120177 89 16.0 -24.91 0.0032 63.04 61.05 5.362759 0.946369 105 18.0 -26.39 0.0023 56.12 53.88 3.775645 0.666290 150 20.0 -18.43 0.0144 50.59 48.10 2.017501 0.356030 280 22.0 -15.93 0.0255 46.08 43.33 1.140245 0.201220 496 24.0 -15.35 0.0292 42.33 39.32 1.321211 0.233155 428 26.0 -16.05 0.0248 39.17 35.90 1.538875 0.271566 368 28.0 -17.89 0.0163 36.47 32.93 1.770085 0.312368 320 30.0 -21.25 0.0075 34.14 30.32 2.013014 0.355238 281 32.0 -27.75 0.0017 32.11 28.02 2.245390 0.396245 252 34.0 -40.00 0.0001 30.32 25.96 2.129489 0.375792 266 36.0 -27.03 0.0020 28.75 24.10 1.591906 0.280925 355 38.0 -22.46 0.0057 27.35 22.41 0.884011 0.156002 641 40.0 -20.27 0.0094 26.10 20.86 1.285202 0.226800 440 42.0 -19.41 0.0115 24.98 19.44 1.554618 0.274344 364 44.0 -19.37 0.0116 23.97 18.13 1.684375 0.297243 336 46.0 -20.04 0.0099 23.06 16.91 1.806293 0.318758 313 48.0 -21.24 0.0075 22.23 15.76 1.930616 0.340697 293 50.0 -23.06 0.0049 21.49 14.69 2.053698 0.362417 275 52.0 -25.45 0.0029 20.81 13.68 2.148551 0.379156 263 54.0 -28.84 0.0013 20.19 12.72 1.964936 0.346753 288 56.0 -33.54 0.0004 19.63 11.81 1.579977 0.278820 358 58.0 -40.00 0.0001 19.12 10.94 1.085883 0.191626 521 60.0 -40.00 0.0001 18.65 10.11 0.645604 0.113930 877 62.0 -37.01 0.0002 18.23 9.31 0.298544 0.052684 1898 64.0 -33.73 0.0004 17.85 8.54 0.162042 0.028596 3497 66.0 -31.95 0.0006 17.51 7.79 0.215840 0.038089 2625 68.0 -31.10 0.0008 17.20 7.07 0.236849 0.041797 2392 70.0 -30.95 0.0008 16.92 6.37 0.244147 0.043085 2321 72.0 -30.99 0.0008 16.68 5.69 0.247596 0.043693 2288 74.0 -31.46 0.0007 16.46 5.02 0.253713 0.044773 2233 76.0 -32.34 0.0006 16.27 4.37 0.255039 0.045007 2221 78.0 -33.28 0.0005 16.11 3.72 0.258836 0.045677 2189 80.0 -34.82 0.0003 15.98 3.09 0.236632 0.041759 2394 82.0 -36.50 0.0002 15.87 2.46 0.190385 0.033597 2976 84.0 -38.57 0.0001 15.79 1.84 0.147793 0.026081 3834 86.0 -40.00 0.0001 15.73 1.22 0.103595 0.018282 5470 88.0 -40.00 0.0001 15.69 0.61 0.066652 0.011762 8501 90.0 -40.00 0.0001 15.68 0.00 0.037487 0.006615 15116 172 41 of 41 Verizon Wireless Westgate (Revised) 816226 ANDREW:LBX-6513DS-VTM Antenna Worksheet (280 Sector) Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE): 566.67 ERP (Watts): 2000 Height (feet): 58 Frequency (MHz): 850 Downtilt (Degrees): 0.0 Depression Angle (degrees) Relative dB Relative Gain Slant Distance (meters) Dist From Structure (meters) Power Density (µW/cm^2) Percent of MPE Times Below MPE 0.1 -0.01 0.9988 10030.91 10030.90 0.000663 0.000117 854973 1.0 -0.05 0.9886 1003.11 1002.99 0.066276 0.011696 8550 2.0 -0.21 0.9528 501.59 501.34 0.265072 0.046777 2137 3.0 -0.46 0.8995 334.43 334.06 0.596288 0.105227 950 4.0 -0.86 0.8204 250.86 250.37 1.059761 0.187017 534 5.0 -1.35 0.7328 200.72 200.11 1.655260 0.292105 342 6.0 -1.96 0.6368 167.31 166.57 2.372772 0.418724 238 7.0 -2.74 0.5321 143.44 142.59 3.175739 0.560425 178 8.0 -3.62 0.4345 125.55 124.57 3.970364 0.700652 142 9.0 -4.73 0.3365 111.64 110.54 4.474457 0.789610 126 10.0 -6.02 0.2500 100.52 99.29 4.981345 0.879061 113 12.0 -9.37 0.1156 83.84 82.37 6.004852 1.059680 94 14.0 -14.51 0.0354 71.95 70.22 6.347668 1.120177 89 16.0 -24.91 0.0032 63.04 61.05 5.362759 0.946369 105 18.0 -26.39 0.0023 56.12 53.88 3.775645 0.666290 150 20.0 -18.43 0.0144 50.59 48.10 2.017498 0.356029 280 22.0 -15.93 0.0255 46.08 43.33 1.140245 0.201220 496 24.0 -15.35 0.0292 42.33 39.32 1.321211 0.233155 428 26.0 -16.05 0.0248 39.17 35.90 1.538955 0.271580 368 28.0 -17.89 0.0163 36.47 32.93 1.770085 0.312368 320 30.0 -21.25 0.0075 34.14 30.32 2.013014 0.355238 281 32.0 -27.75 0.0017 32.11 28.02 2.245104 0.396195 252 34.0 -40.00 0.0001 30.32 25.96 2.129489 0.375792 266 36.0 -27.03 0.0020 28.75 24.10 1.592332 0.281000 355 38.0 -22.46 0.0057 27.35 22.41 0.884012 0.156002 641 40.0 -20.27 0.0094 26.10 20.86 1.285202 0.226800 440 42.0 -19.41 0.0115 24.98 19.44 1.552464 0.273964 365 44.0 -19.37 0.0116 23.97 18.13 1.684376 0.297243 336 46.0 -20.04 0.0099 23.06 16.91 1.810101 0.319430 313 48.0 -21.24 0.0075 22.23 15.76 1.935259 0.341516 292 50.0 -23.06 0.0049 21.49 14.69 2.053698 0.362417 275 52.0 -25.45 0.0029 20.81 13.68 2.141171 0.377854 264 54.0 -28.84 0.0013 20.19 12.72 1.964936 0.346754 288 56.0 -33.54 0.0004 19.63 11.81 1.579977 0.278819 358 58.0 -40.00 0.0001 19.12 10.94 1.085884 0.191627 521 60.0 -40.00 0.0001 18.65 10.11 0.648604 0.114460 873 62.0 -37.01 0.0002 18.23 9.31 0.299932 0.052929 1889 64.0 -33.73 0.0004 17.85 8.54 0.162042 0.028596 3497 66.0 -31.95 0.0006 17.51 7.79 0.215840 0.038089 2625 68.0 -31.10 0.0008 17.20 7.07 0.235426 0.041546 2406 70.0 -30.95 0.0008 16.92 6.37 0.244147 0.043085 2321 72.0 -30.99 0.0008 16.68 5.69 0.247596 0.043693 2288 74.0 -31.46 0.0007 16.46 5.02 0.251685 0.044415 2251 76.0 -32.34 0.0006 16.27 4.37 0.255039 0.045007 2221 78.0 -33.28 0.0005 16.11 3.72 0.255890 0.045157 2214 80.0 -34.82 0.0003 15.98 3.09 0.233490 0.041204 2426 82.0 -36.50 0.0002 15.87 2.46 0.190385 0.033597 2976 84.0 -38.57 0.0001 15.79 1.84 0.150702 0.026595 3760 86.0 -40.00 0.0001 15.73 1.22 0.101260 0.017869 5596 88.0 -40.00 0.0001 15.69 0.61 0.064940 0.011460 8726 90.0 -40.00 0.0001 15.68 0.00 0.037461 0.006611 15127 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Date: December 12, 2012 Application: ZOA12-0011 – Zoning Amendment Location: City Wide Applicant/Owner: City of Saratoga Staff Planner: James Lindsay, Community Development Dir. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution 12-053 recommending approval of the definition of market to the City Council. BACKGROUND: At its October 17th meeting, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to create a definition for market within the zoning code. Markets require a conditional use permit in all commercial zoning districts but the code does not contain a definition for a market. The Planning Commission held a study session on November 27th and discussed different approaches for defining markets and distinguishing them from retail stores. A general consensus was reached that a definition of market should include the sale of all food items sold for off-site consumption. SUMMARY: Including a definition for a market within the zoning code will clearly distinguish markets from retail establishments and eliminate the need for any administrative interpretations. The proposed definition for market is: 15-06.441 – Market. “Market” means an establishment which sells or offers for sale to the public any food or drink for human consumption off-site, with the exception of a tasting room as defined in this Article or a lawfully located mobile canteen or other mobile unit as defined in Article 7-25. Tasting rooms are defined as a commercial establishment that does not contain a kitchen and is devoted to the sampling, consumption, and sales of wine or beer produced on or off the premises. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The proposed amendments to the City Code are Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline sections 15305 - Minor Alteration to Land Use Limitations, 15308 – Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment, and also exempt under CEQA Guideline section 15061(b)(3) - the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential of causing a significant effect on the environment and where, as here, it can be 1 191 Application No. ZOA12-0006 2 seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution with Exhibit A – Draft Ordinance 192 Attachment 1 CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO: 12-053 Application ZOA12-0011 City of Saratoga The City of Saratoga Planning Commission finds and determines as follows with respect to the above-described application: I. Project Summary Defining the word “market” as an establishment which sells or offers for sale to the public any food or drink for human consumption off the premises. II. Planning Commission Review On December 12, 2012, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing on the Project at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence and argument. The Planning Commission considered the Project, the Staff Report on the Project, correspondence, presentations from the public, and all testimony and other evidence presented at the Public Hearing. III. Environmental Review The proposed amendments to the City Code are Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline sections 15305 - Minor Alteration to Land Use Limitations, 15308 – Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment, and also exempt under CEQA Guideline section 15061(b)(3) - the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential of causing a significant effect on the environment and where, as here, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. IV. Zoning Ordinance Amendment Recommendation After careful consideration of the staff report and other materials, exhibits and evidence submitted to the City in connection with this matter, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga does hereby recommend the City Council adopt an ordinance creating a definition in the City Zoning Ordinance for the word “market” to read as follows: Article 15-06 - DEFINITIONS 15-06.441 – Market. “Market” means an establishment which sells or offers for sale to the public any food or drink for human consumption off-site, with the exception of a tasting room as defined in this Article or a lawfully located mobile canteen or other mobile unit as defined in Article 7-25. 193 2 ZOA12-0011 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission this 12th day of December 2012 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ____________________________ Tina K. Walia Chair, Planning Commission Exhibit A – Draft Ordinance 194 3 ZOA12-0011 Exhibit 1 ORDINANCE __________ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 15-06 OF THE SARATOGA CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Findings 1. The City of Saratoga wishes to amend Article 15-06 of the City Code to define the word market. 2. Amendments in this ordinance affect provisions of the City’s zoning regulations in Chapter 15 of the Code. These amendments were considered by the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga and the Commission, after a duly noticed public hearing on December 12, 2012, recommended adoption of the amendments to Chapter 15 as set forth below. 3. The City Council of the City of Saratoga held a duly noticed public hearing on ________ and after considering all testimony and written materials provided in connection with that hearing, introduced this ordinance. Therefore, the City Council hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Adoption. The Saratoga City Code is amended as set forth below. Text to be added is indicated in double- underlined font (e.g., double-underlined) and text to be deleted is indicated in strikeout font (e.g., strikeout). Text in standard font remains unchanged by this ordinance. Text in italics (e.g., italics) is provided to promote readability and is not a part of this ordinance. Article 15-06 - DEFINITIONS 15-06.441 – Market. “Market” means an establishment which sells or offers for sale to the public any food or drink for human consumption off-site, with the exception of a tasting room as defined in this Article or a lawfully located mobile canteen or other mobile unit as defined in Article 7-25. Section 2. Severance Clause. The City Council declares that each section, sub-section, paragraph, sub-paragraph, sentence, clause and phrase of this ordinance is severable and independent of every other section, sub-section, paragraph, sub-paragraph, sentence, clause and phrase of this ordinance. If any section, sub-section, paragraph, sub-paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is held invalid, the City Council declares that it would have adopted the remaining provisions of this ordinance 195 4 ZOA12-0011 regardless of the portion held invalid, and further declares its express intent that the remaining portions of this ordinance should remain in effect after the invalid portion has been eliminated. Section 3. California Environmental Quality Act The proposed amendments to the City Code are Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guideline sections 15305 - Minor Alteration to Land Use Limitations, 15308 – Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment, and also exempt under CEQA Guideline section 15061(b)(3) - the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential of causing a significant effect on the environment. Section 4. Publication. This ordinance or a comprehensive summary thereof shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation of the City of Saratoga within fifteen days after its adoption. Following a duly notice public hearing the foregoing ordinance was introduced and read at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Saratoga held on the _____ day of ______, 2013, and was adopted by the following vote following a second reading on the (Insert Date). COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED: ATTEST: _________________________________ _____________________________ Chuck Page Crystal Morrow MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA CLERK OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA Saratoga, California Saratoga, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________________________ RICHARD TAYLOR, CITY ATTORNEY 196