HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-27-2011 Planning Commission PacketTable of Contents
Agenda 2
July 13, 2011
Draft Minutes 4
APPLICATION PDR11-0009 (393-21-006) AT&T / RealCom,
13000 Glen Brae Drive
Staff Report - 13000 Glen Brae Drive 6
Att. 1 - Resolution - PDR11-0009 10
Att. 2 - Resolution - CUP09-0013 16
Att. 3 - Photo Simulations, Exhibit "B"22
Att. 4 - Coverage Map - 13000 Glen Brae 25
Att. 5 - RF Report 28
Att. 6 - Neighbor Notifications 32
Att. 7 - Public Notice 34
APPLICATION PDR11-0008 (403-24-001) AT&T / RealCom,
13686 Quito Road
Staff Report - 13686 Quito Road 37
Att. 1 - Resolution - 13686 Quito Road 41
Att. 2 - Resolution - UP-01-010 47
Att. 3 - Photo Simulations, Exhibit B 51
Att. 4 - Coverage Map - 13686 Quito Road 54
Att. 5 - RF Analysis - 13686 Quito Road 57
Att. 6 - Neighbor Notification 60
Att. 7 - Public Hearing Notices, Affadavit, and Mailing
Label 62
1
CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
DATE: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 - 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: Council Chambers/Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA
TYPE: Regular Meeting
ROLL CALL
Commissioners – Chair Douglas Robertson, Vice-Chair Tina K. Walia, Mary-Lynne Bernald, Pragati Grover, Joyce
Hlava, David Reis and Yan Zhao
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
MINUTES
Action Minutes from the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of July 13, 2011
ORAL COMMUNICATION
Any member of the Public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three minutes on matters not
on this agenda. The law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items.
However, the Planning Commission may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Planning
Commission direction to Staff.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS- PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTION TO STAFF
REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA
Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on July 21, 2011
REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS
If you wish to appeal any decision on this Agenda, you may file an “Appeal Application” with the City Clerk
within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15-90.050 (b).
All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. Applicants/Appellants and
their representatives have a total of ten minutes maximum for opening statements. Members of the Public
may comment on any item for up to three minutes. Applicant/Appellants and their representatives have a
total of five minutes maximum for closing statements.
PUBLIC HEARING
1. APPLICATION PDR11-0008 (403-24-001) AT&T / RealCom, 13686 Quito Road - The applicant is
requesting Design Review approval to install three new Long Term Evolution (LTE) panel antennas, six
new Remote Radio Units (RRU), one hidden fiber distribution unit and surge protector, and associated
cellular equipment. The project also includes the installation of a RBS 6601 repeater within the AT&T
equipment shelter. The new antennas and associated cellular equipment would be installed 65 feet above
grade onto an existing 115 foot lattice utility tower. There is no proposed increase of height to the existing
tower or shelter to accommodate this project. The gross lot size is approximately 1.5 acres and is located in
the R1-10,000 zoning district. (Michael Fossati)
2. APPLICATION PDR11-0009 (393-21-006) AT&T / RealCom, 13000 Glen Brae Drive - The applicant
is requesting Design Review approval to install three new Long Term Evolution (LTE) panel antennas, six
new Remote Radio Units (RRU), one hidden fiber distribution unit and surge protector, and associated
cellular equipment. The project also includes the installation of a RBS 6601 repeater within the AT&T
equipment shelter. The new antennas and associated cellular equipment would be installed 60 feet above
grade onto an existing 133 foot lattice utility tower. There is no proposed increase of height to the existing
2
tower or shelter to accommodate this project. The utility structure is located on the south of Congress
Springs Park and the Railroad Tracks. The gross lot size is approximately 77,000 sq. ft. and is located in
the R1-12,500 zoning district. (Michael Fossati)
DIRECTORS ITEM
COMMISSION ITEMS
COMMUNICATIONS
ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING
- Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers/Civic Theater
13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (408) 868-1269 or ctclerk@saratoga.ca.us. Notification 48 hours prior to
the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR
35.102-35.104 ADA Title II).
POSTING
Certificate of Posting of Agenda: I, Abby Ayende, Office Specialist for the City of Saratoga, declare that the
foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga was posted on July 21, 2011,
at the office of the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 and was available for public
review at that location. The agenda is also available on the City’s website at www.saratoga.ca.us
If you would like to receive the Agenda’s via e-mail, please send your e-mail address to planning@saratoga.ca.us
NOTE: To view previous Planning Commission meetings anytime, go the City Video Archives at
www.saratoga.ca.us
3
CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION
ACTION MINUTES
DATE: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 - 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: Council Chambers/Civic Theater, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA
TYPE: Regular Meeting
ROLL CALL
Commissioners – Chair Douglas Robertson, Vice-Chair Tina K. Walia, Mary-Lynne Bernald, Pragati Grover, Joyce
Hlava, David Reis and Yan Zhao
ABSENT
Commissioner Grover
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
MINUTES
Action Minutes from the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of June 22, 2011 (Approved 6:0)
ORAL COMMUNICATION
Any member of the Public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three minutes on matters not
on this agenda. The law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items.
However, the Planning Commission may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications under Planning
Commission direction to Staff.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS- PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTION TO STAFF
REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA
Pursuant to Government Code 54954.2, the agenda for this meeting was properly posted on July 7, 2011
REPORT OF APPEAL RIGHTS
If you wish to appeal any decision on this Agenda, you may file an “Appeal Application” with the City Clerk
within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision, pursuant to Municipal Code 15-90.050 (b).
All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. Applicants/Appellants and
their representatives have a total of ten minutes maximum for opening statements. Members of the Public
may comment on any item for up to three minutes. Applicant/Appellants and their representatives have a
total of five minutes maximum for closing statements.
PUBLIC HEARING
1. Application PDR11-0004 (T-Mobile); 19700 Allendale Avenue (397-30-053) - The applicant is
requesting Design Review approval for a wireless telecommunication facility. T-Mobile is proposing two
options: Option A is a new 87 foot tall mono-pole installation with three (3) antennas in a flush mount
configuration. Option B is a new 92 foot tall mono-pine stealth installation (designed to camouflage the
pole by resembling a tree with branches) with six (6) antennas. The applicant is also proposing a ten (10)
foot whip antenna at the top of the pole for a total height of 97 feet. The equipment would be located in a
360 square foot enclosure at the base of the pole that would be screened by a slatted fence. The maximum
radio-frequency exposure level was calculated at .026% of the public exposure limit set by the Federal
Communications Commission. The installation could be a co-location for additional antennas and
equipment that would require a separate design review application. (Cynthia McCormick, AICP) (Denied,
1:5(Robertson, Walia, Bernald, Reis, Zhao))
4
DIRECTORS ITEM
COMMISSION ITEMS
COMMUNICATIONS
ADJOURNMENT TO NEXT MEETING – ADJOURNED 10:22 PM
- Wednesday, July 27, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers/Civic Theater
13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (408) 868-1269 or ctclerk@saratoga.ca.us. Notification 48 hours prior to
the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR
35.102-35.104 ADA Title II).
POSTING
Certificate of Posting of Agenda: I, Abby Ayende, Office Specialist for the City of Saratoga, declare that the
foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga was posted on July 7, 2011,
at the office of the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 and was available for public
review at that location. The agenda is also available on the City’s website at www.saratoga.ca.us
If you would like to receive the Agenda’s via e-mail, please send your e-mail address to planning@saratoga.ca.us
NOTE: To view previous Planning Commission meetings anytime, go the City Video Archives at
www.saratoga.ca.us
5
REPORT TO THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
Meeting Date: July 27, 2011
Application Type / No: Design Review / PDR11-0009
Location: 13000 Glen Brae Dr.
Owner / Applicant: PG&E / Christian Hill (AT&T)
Staff Planner: Michael Fossati
APN: 393-21-006
Department Head: Chris Riordan, AICP
13000 Glen Brae Dr.
6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CASE HISTORY
Application filed: 04/25/11
Application complete: 06/06/11
Notice published: 07/12/11
Mailing completed: 07/05/11
Posting completed: 07/21/11
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting Design Review approval to install three new Long Term Evolution (LTE)
panel antennas, six new Remote Radio Units (RRU), one hidden fiber distribution unit and surge
protector, and associated cellular equipment. The project also includes the installation of a RBS 6601
repeater within the AT&T equipment shelter. The new antennas and associated cellular equipment
would be installed 60 feet above grade onto an existing 133 foot lattice utility tower. There is no
proposed increase of height to the existing tower or shelter to accommodate this project. The utility
structure is located on the south of Congress Springs Park and the Railroad Tracks. The gross lot size is
approximately 77,000 sq. ft. and is located in the R1-12,500 zoning district.
PERMANENT CONDITIONS
No permanent conditions of approval are required.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Design Review application by adopting the attached Resolution.
7
PROJECT DATA
ZONING: R-1-12,500
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential: M-12.5
MEASURE G: Not applicable.
PARCEL SIZE: ~77,000 sq. ft.
AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: <1%
GRADING REQUIRED: None
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed project, which includes installation and replacement of new cellular equipment is
categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303
of the Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA. This Class 3 exemption applies to new construction of
limited small new facilities; installation of small, new equipment and facilities in small structures.
PROJECT DISCUSSION
Site Characteristics and Background
The applicant is requesting Design Review Approval to install three (3) new panel antennas to an
existing Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) lattice tower. The height of the tower is approximately 135
feet. There is no proposal to increase the height of the exiting tower. Adjacent uses include Congress
Springs Park & Highway 85 to the north and west and single-family residential to the south and east.
Currently installed on the tower are antennas from multiple cellular carriers. The most recent carrier to
install cellular antennas on the utility tower was Verizon in 2009 (Attachment 2).
The proposal includes the installation of three new LTE antennas. LTE technology claims to increase
data speeds for existing and new cellular customers with smartphones, computers, and tablets. The
dimensions of the new antennas are four and a half feet tall, one foot wide, and six inches deep. The
proposed antennas are exactly the same size as the existing panel antennas located on the tower. The
new antennas would be attached to a new H-frame crossbar, which is attached to the tower. Six
rectangular boxes, known as RRU’s, would be installed underneath the H-frame crossbar. The RRU’s
are used to remotely change the tilt of the new antennas. Similar to satellite antennas, the placement and
angle of cellular antennas can be manipulated to increase or decrease signal strength. In the past, utility
workers were required to either scale the tower or used a construction boom to access those antennas.
The project also includes the proposed installation of one new GPS antenna to the roof of the existing
equipment shed and associated cellular equipment, such as conduit and cabling. A photo-simulation has
been added to the report to illustrate the new look of the additional antennas and associated equipment
(Attachment 3). The applicant is proposing the installation of the new antennas in order to upgrade the
existing technology to the new standard, also known as LTE. A wireless coverage map demonstrating
the existing and proposed coverage has been included in this staff report (Attachment 4).
Noise-Generating Devices
No noise-generating devices would be required for the project. The existing equipment room is
currently equipped to supply the required power for the proposed antenna installation.
8
Proposed Exterior Materials and Colors
The proposed antennas and associated equipment would be painted with to match the existing tower.
The new cabling would be hidden behind a leg of the existing tower.
Alternative Sites
AT&T has multiple sites in Saratoga. AT&T has determined that 13000 Glen Brae Drive is an optimal
site to install the proposed antennas due to its location, its existing infrastructure, and its limited visual
impact, in comparison to a singular monopole. Per the Coverage Map, there appears to be a significant
reduction of in-building and in-transit service along Highway 85 and residential properties on the north
and south side of Congress Springs Park. The proposed placement of the antennas would substantially
increase data and network speed for commuters and customers who reside in those properties discussed
above.
FCC Requirements
Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has
exclusive jurisdiction over RF emissions from personal wireless antenna facilities. Pursuant to its
authority under Federal law, the FCC has established rules to regulate the safety of emissions from these
facilities. Any interference to the established rules regulating safety of emissions would be against
Federal law and in violation of AT&T’s FCC License. A condition has been added to the attached
resolution that the applicant must meet all requirements established by the FCC. The applicant has
provided a Radio Frequency (RF) Analysis (Attachment 5) which concludes that the proposed
telecommunications facility would comply with the FCC’s current prevailing standard. Due to the
applicants mounting locations, the antennas would not be accessible to the general public and in
compliance with FCC public exposure guidelines.
Correspondence and Neighbor Review
The applicant mailed (by certified mail) neighborhood notification forms to nearby property owners.
The applicant received two responses back (Attachment 6). One response had no concerns with the
proposal while the second response had issue due to “health concerns with radio wave transmission from
the tower”. Staff tried to contact the concerned citizen but never received a return response. A public
hearing notice was mailed to 45 property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. Staff has
received no comments to date on this project. Please refer to the complete list of neighbors who were
contacted via the public noticing (Attachment 7).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the proposed wireless facility (Application
PDR11-0009) by adopting the attached Resolution.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution of Approval
2. Resolution of Approval – CUP09-0013
3. Photo simulations, Exhibit “B”
4. Coverage Map
5. Radio Frequency Analysis
6. Neighbor Notifications
7. Public Hearing Notice, Affidavit and Mailing Label
8. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A"
9
CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 11-017 FOR APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIEW
Application # PDR 11-0009
AT&T (RealCom) / 13000 Glen Brae Dr
The City of Saratoga Planning Commission finds and determines as follows with respect to the
above-described application:
I. Project Summary
The City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review
Approval for the Project shown in Exhibit "A" including a photo simulation denominated Exhibit
“B” date stamped July 5, 2011, incorporated by this reference. The proposed project is the
installation of three new antennas and associated equipment on an existing utility tower. The
overall number for AT&T would be nine antennas and six Radio Remote Units. The length of the
antennas would be approximately 4 ½ feet tall. The length of the Radio Remote Units would be
approximately 1 ¼ feet tall. The foregoing will be described as the “Project” in this Resolution.
II. Design Review Requirement
City Code Section 15-12.020 (i) and 15-46.020(a) (7) requires Design Review Approval for any
new antenna facility operated by a public utility for transmitting and receiving cellular telephone
and wireless communication. This Design Review Approval requirement implements the Saratoga
General Plan, including but not limited to: Land Use Goal 13 which provides that the City shall use
the Design Review process to assure that new construction and major additions thereto are
compatible with the site and the adjacent surrounding.
III. Planning Commission Review
On July 27, 2011, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing on the Project at
which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence
and argument. The Planning Commission considered the Project, the staff report on the Project,
CEQA documentation, correspondence, presentation from the Applicant and the public, and all
testimony and other evidence presented at the Public Hearing.
IV. Environmental Review
The Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. Section 15301), “Existing Facilities”. This exemption
allows for minor modifications involving negligible expansion of use and no exception to that
exemption applies.
V. Design Review Findings
The findings required for issuance of a Design Review Approval pursuant to City Code Section 15-
46.040 are set forth below and the Applicant has met the burden of proof to support making all of
those required findings:
10
2
Application No. PDR 11-0009; 13000 Glen Brae Dr.
(a) Where more than one building or structure will be constructed, the architectural features and
landscaping thereof shall be harmonious. Such features include height, elevations, roofs,
material, color, and appurtenances. The proposed structure will be harmonious in appearance
and design with the existing utility tower. The proposed antennas will be installed on an existing
tower and located substantially above ground, outside of typical public view. The proposed
antennas and accessory cabling will be constructed of the same material and painted a color to
match the existing antennas and utility tower structure. This finding can be made in the
affirmative.
(b) Where more than one sign will be erected or displayed on the site, the sign shall have a
common or compatible design theme and locational positions and shall be harmonious in
appearance. The project does not include any additional signage for the proposed project. The
project includes antennas, Radio Remote Head (RRH) units, and accessory cellular equipment
to be installed to an existing utility tower. The finding can be made in the affirmative.
(c) Landscaping shall integrate and accommodate existing trees and vegetation to be preserved;
it shall make use of water-conserving plants, materials and irrigation systems to the
maximum extent feasible; and, to the maximum extent feasible, it shall be clustered in
natural appearing groups, as opposed to being placed in rows or regularly spaced. The
applicant (AT&T) currently has a master landscape maintenance agreement with the property
owner (PG&E). The applicant has been consistent in maintaining the existing screening
vegetation along Glen Brae Drive. The vegetation at the proposed location in vibrant, lush and
healthy. The applicant (as required) will continue to maintain the existing landscape buffer to
the satisfaction of the PG&E and the City of Saratoga. This finding can be made in the
affirmative.
(d) Colors of wall and roofing materials shall blend with the natural landscape and be
nonreflective. This project does not propose a wall or roofing materials. The existing
equipment shelter is out of sight from the public right-of-way and will not be impacted due to
the proposed project. The colors of the materials of the antennas, Radio Remote Units, and
associated equipment will match the existing utility tower, as conditioned. The colors are muted
and non-reflective. This finding can be made in the affirmative.
(e) Roofing materials shall be wood shingles, wood shakes, tile, or other materials such as
composition as approved by the Planning Commission. No mechanical equipment shall be
located upon a roof unless it is appropriately screened. This project does not propose a roof or
roof structure. All associated equipment will be placed on within a existing equipment shed or
on an existing tower and be painted in a color to match. This finding can be made in the
affirmative.
(f) The proposed development shall be compatible in terms of height, bulk, and design with other
structures in the immediate area. This project meets this finding in that the proposal will not
substantially add any additional mass to the existing utility tower. The height will not be
increased and the installation of the proposed new antennas is virtually identical to the existing
11
3
Application No. PDR 11-0009; 13000 Glen Brae Dr.
antennas that will be removed. The design is less obtrusive than a new monopole structure and
significantly unnoticeable from the public right-of-way. This finding can be made in the
affirmative.
VI. Project Approval
After careful consideration of the application, site plan, architectural drawings, and other materials
and exhibits and evidence submitted to the City in connection with this matter, Application No.
PDR11-0009 (Planning Commission Design Review) for the installation of a wireless antenna
facility and Radio Remote Head Units is approved subject to the conditions set forth below.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
A. GENERAL
1. The Planning Commission shall retain continuing jurisdiction over the Design Review and
may, at any time, modify, delete, or impose any new conditions of the permit to preserve the
public health, safety, and welfare.
2. Conditions may be modified only by the Planning Commission unless modification is expressly
otherwise allowed by the city code including but not limited to section 16-05.035, as applicable.
3. The Community Development Director shall mail to the Owner/Applicant a notice in writing,
on or after the time this Resolution of Approval is duly executed by the City, containing a
statement of all amounts due to the City in connection with this application, including all
consultant fees (collectively “processing fees”). This approval or permit shall expire sixty
(60) days after the date said notice is mailed if all processing fees contained in the notice
have not been paid in full. No Zoning Clearance or Demolition, Grading, or Building Permit
may be issued until the Community Development Director certifies that all processing fees have
been paid in full (and, for deposit accounts, a surplus balance of $500 is maintained).
4. A Building Permit must be issued and construction commenced within 36 months from the date
of adoption of this Resolution and the Design Review will expire unless extended in accordance
with the City Code.
5. The facility shall at all times operate in compliance with all applicable regulations of the
State, County, City and/or other governmental agencies having jurisdictional authority over
the facility pertaining to, but not limited to, health, sanitation, safety, and water quality
issues. The Project shall maintain compliance with all applicable requirements of the State,
County, City and other governmental entities having jurisdiction.
6. Prior to issuance of any demolition, grading, or building permit to implement this Design
Review approval the Applicant shall obtain a “Zoning Clearance” from the Community
Development Director by submitting final plans for the requested permit to the Community
12
4
Application No. PDR 11-0009; 13000 Glen Brae Dr.
Development Department for review to ascertain compliance with the requirements of this
Resolution.
7. Agreement to Indemnify, Hold Harmless and Defend City as to Action Challenging
Approval of Application and as to Damage from Performance of Work Authorized by
Design Review Approval. As a condition of this Approval, Owner and Applicant hereby agree
to defend, indemnify and hold the City and its officers, officials, boards, commissions,
employees, agents and volunteers harmless from and against:
a. any and all claims, actions or proceedings to attack, set aside, void or annul any
action on the subject application, or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations
taken, done or made prior to said action; and
b. any and all claims, demands, actions, expenses or liabilities arising from or in any
manner relating to the performance of such construction, installation, alteration or
grading work by the Owner and/or Applicant, their successors, or by any person
acting on their behalf.
In addition, prior to any Zoning Clearance from the Community Development Director, Owner
and Applicant shall execute a separate agreement containing the details of this required
Agreement to Indemnify, Hold harmless and Defend, which shall be subject to prior approval
as to form and content by the Community Development Director.
B. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
8. Compliance with Plans. The facility shall be operated, located and constructed to include those
features, and only those features, as shown on the Approved Plans denominated Exhibit "A" and
Photo Simulations denominated Exhibit “B”, date stamped July 5, 2011, incorporated by this
reference. All proposed changes to the Approved Plans must be submitted in writing with plans
showing the changes, including a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. Such changes
shall be subject to the requisite prior City approval.
9. Harmonizing with Existing Structures. Prior to the installation of the proposed panel antennas
and accessory equipment, the equipment shall be painted a color similar to the existing utility
tower and subject to approval of the Community Development Director.
10. Safety Fencing During Construction. During all phases of construction, the Applicant shall
install and maintain temporary safety fencing to restrict or prevent public access to active on-site
construction activities, materials, or chemicals.
11. Decommission. If the subject site is decommissioned in the future, all cellular antennas and
related equipment shall be removed within 30 days of cessation of operation.
12. Governmental entities. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other
Governmental entities, including the California Public Utilities Commission, must be met.
13
5
Application No. PDR 11-0009; 13000 Glen Brae Dr.
13. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Verification. The owner and/or Applicant for
this Project shall contact the FCC and verify whether there are any required permits from said
Commission. If required by the FCC, prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for any proposed
equipment installations (or if none, prior to commencement of the approved use), the Owner
and/or Applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department documentation from
the FCC showing proof of compliance of the proposed use and/or development with the FCC's
requirements.
14. Fire Agency Conditions. The Owner / Applicant shall comply with all Fire Agency
Conditions.
15. Building Department. The Owner / Applicant shall comply with all building standards
including any improvements necessary to comply with the building code.
16. Emergency Access. The owner / applicant shall provide a 24-hour phone number to which
interference problems may be reported, and will resolve all interference complaints within 24
hours from the time the interference was reported.
14
6
Application No. PDR 11-0009; 13000 Glen Brae Dr.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission this 27th day of July 2011 by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
Douglas R. Robertson
Chair, Planning Commission
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Christopher A. Riordan, AICP
Secretary to the Planning Commission
ACCEPTANCE BY APPLICANT AND OWNER
This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no
force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant and Property Owner or
Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and
agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the time required in
this Resolution by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission.
__________________________________ ____________________________
Applicant Date
__________________________________ ____________________________
Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date
15
Page 1 of 6
CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. __–___ FOR APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT.
Application CUP09-0013
Verizon Wireless: Glen Brae Dr. at Chardonnay Ct.
The City of Saratoga Planning Commission finds and determines as follows with respect to the
above-described application:
I. Project Summary
The City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for a Conditional Use
Permit for the Project shown in Exhibit "A" including a Photo Simulation Board denominated
Exhibit “B” date stamped respectively July 31, 2009, each incorporated by this reference. The
approval of the following Conditional Use Permit will supersede the existing Conditional Use
Permit (UP-99-020) currently in affect. This Project includes the installation of three (3) panel
antennas and three (3) conduit runs onto an existing utility lattice tower. The maximum height
of the existing lattice tower will not increase or exceed 136 feet. The net lot size is
approximately 77,000 square-feet and the site is zoned R-1-12,500. The foregoing work is
described as the “Project” in this Resolution.
II. Use Permit Requirement
City Code Sections 15-55.010 and 15-12.030 (l) requires Conditional Use Permit Approval for
antenna facilities operated by a public utility for transmitting and receiving cellular telephone
and other wireless communications. This Conditional Use Permit Approval requirement
implements the Saratoga General Plan, including, but not limited to: Land Use Element Policy
LU 5.2 – Development proposals shall be evaluated against City standards and guidelines to
assure that the related traffic, noise, light, appearance, and intensity of the proposed use have
limited adverse impact on the area and can be fully mitigated.
III. Planning Commission Review
On August 12, 2009, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing on the Project
at which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present
evidence and argument. The Planning Commission considered the Project, the staff report on the
Project, CEQA documentation, correspondence and presentations from the Applicant and the
public, and all testimony and other evidence presented at the Public Hearing.
IV. Environmental Review
The Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. Section 15303), “New Construction or Conversion of
Small Structures”, Class 3 of Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”). This
exemption allows for the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or
structures] and no exception to that exemption applies.
16
Page 2 of 6
V. Consistency with General Plan
This Project is consistent with the General Plan, including but not limited to the following
policies:
Land Use Element Policy LU 5.2 – Development proposals shall be evaluated against City
standards and guidelines to assure that the related traffic, noise, light, appearance, and
intensity of the proposed use have limited adverse impact on the area and can be fully
mitigated. The Project included a previously approved Resolution (UP-99-020) for the
installation of six (6) panel antennas in December 1999. The Project had been reviewed by the
Planning Commission and after careful consideration of the site plan, architectural drawings,
plans and other exhibits submitted by the applicant, the Project was determined compatible with
the conditional use permit findings contained in Saratoga City Code Section 15-55.070. The
additional installation of antennas will not have an adverse impact to related traffic, light,
appearance and intensity of the proposed use.
VI. Use Permit Findings
The findings required for issuance of a Use Permit are set forth below. The Applicant’s Project
CUP09-0012 has met the burden of proof to support the Findings required for approval of a Use
Permit under Article 15-55 of the City Code, as set forth below:
(a) That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of the
Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the district in which the site is located.
This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the proposed location of the conditional
use is in accord with the objections of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the district
in which the site is located in that it is a conditionally permitted use that is not visually
obstructive and that the visual and audible impact of the facility will be less than significant.
(b) That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it
would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the proposed location of the conditional
use and the conditions under which it would operated or maintained will not be detrimental
to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements
in the vicinity because the facility will be operated under the restrictions imposed by the FCC
to ensure safety with respect to limiting human exposure to radio frequency energy.
(c) That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of
this Chapter.
This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the proposed conditional use will comply
with each of the applicable provisions of Zoning Regulations chapter in that the location,
height, size, A-weighted decibels (dBA), and use proposed is conditionally permitted within
the respective zoning district. The site already accommodates several other antenna facilities
and the new fixtures will be painted to match the existing equipment.
17
Page 3 of 6
(d) That the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect existing or anticipated uses
in the immediate neighborhood, and will not adversely affect surrounding properties or
the occupants thereof.
This finding may be made in the affirmative in that the Project site has been used as a utility
tower and the proposed equipment will be properly installed and aesthetically consistent with
the existing equipment and tower. The proposed use is located substantially high off the
ground and out of site by most residents or guests of the City of Saratoga.
VII. Project Approval
After careful consideration of the application, site plan, architectural drawings, plans, CEQA
documentation, and other materials, exhibits and evidence submitted to the City in connection
with this matter, Application No. CUP09-0013 for a Conditional Use Permit, is approved subject
to the conditions set forth below.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
A. GENERAL
1. ALL CONDITIONS BELOW WHICH ARE IDENTIFIED AS PERMANENT OR FOR
WHICH AN ALTERNATIVE PERIOD OF TIME FOR APPLICABILITY IS SPECIFIED
SHALL RUN WITH THE LAND AND APPLY TO THE LANDOWNER’S SUCCESSORS
IN INTEREST FOR SUCH TIME PERIOD. NO ZONING CLEARANCE, DEMOLITION,
GRADING, OR BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE ISSUED UNTIL
PROOF IS FILED WITH THE CITY THAT A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL
DOCUMENTING ALL APPLICABLE PERMANENT OR OTHER TERM-SPECIFIED
CONDITIONS HAS BEEN RECORDED BY THE APPLICANT WITH THE SANTA
CLARA COUNTY RECORDER’S OFFICE IN FORM AND CONTENT ACCEPTABLE
TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR.
2. IF A CONDITION IS NOT “PERMANENT” OR DOES NOT HAVE A TERM
SPECIFIED, IT SHALL REMAIN IN EFFECT UNTIL THE ISSUANCE BY THE CITY
OF SARATOGA OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR ITS EQUIVALENT.
3. CONDITIONS MAY BE MODIFIED ONLY BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION
UNLESS MODIFICATION IS EXPRESSLY OTHERWISE ALLOWED BY THE CITY
CODE INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SECTIONS 15-80.120 AND/OR 16-05.035,
AS APPLICABLE.
4. The Planning Commission shall retain continuing jurisdiction over the Conditional Use
Permit(s) and may, at any time, modify, delete, or impose, any new conditions of such
Permit(s) to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare.
5. Any intensification of this use shall require an amended Conditional Use Permit. Examples
of intensification of use include, but are not limited to, increasing the hours of the use or
changing the hours of the use to be earlier than 9:00 a.m. or later than 6:00 p.m., physical
changes to the site or structure of the use to accommodate more employees or customers, and
18
Page 4 of 6
changes in operations or equipment that result in ongoing increases in traffic, noise, or other
physical effects.
6. The Community Development Director shall mail to the Owner and Applicant a notice in
writing, on or after the time the Resolution granting this Approval is duly executed by the
City, containing a statement of all amounts due to the City in connection with this
application, including all consultant fees (collectively “processing fees”). THIS
APPROVAL SHALL EXPIRE SIXTY (60) DAYS AFTER THE DATE SAID NOTICE
IS MAILED IF ALL PROCESSING FEES CONTAINED IN THE NOTICE HAVE
NOT BEEN PAID IN FULL. No Zoning Clearance or Building Permit may be issued until
the Community Development Director certifies that all processing fees have been paid in full
(and, for deposit accounts, a surplus balance of $500 is maintained).
7. A Building Permit must be issued and construction commenced within 36 months from the
date of adoption of this Resolution and Use Permit Approval will expire unless extended in
accordance with the City Code.
6. The Project (including the use involved) shall at all times be developed and operate in
compliance with all applicable regulations of the State, County, City and/or other
governmental agencies having jurisdictional authority over the development and/or use
pertaining to, but not limited to, health, sanitation, safety, and water quality issues. The
Project shall also maintain compliance with all applicable regulations of the State, County,
City and/or other governmental agencies having jurisdictional authority over the
development and/or use including, without limitation, the requirements of the Saratoga
Zoning Regulations incorporated herein by this reference.
7. Prior to issuance of any building permit to implement the Use Permit Approval, the
Applicant shall obtain a “Zoning Clearance” from the Community Development Director or
the Director’s designee by submitting final plans for the requested permit to the Community
Development Department for review to ascertain compliance with the requirements of this
Resolution.
8. Agreement to Indemnify, Hold Harmless and Defend City as to Action Challenging
Approval of Application and as to Damage from Performance of Work Authorized by
Conditional Use Permit Approval. As a condition of this Approval, Owner and Applicant
hereby agree to defend, indemnify and hold the City and its officers, officials, boards,
commissions, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from and against:
a. any and all claims, actions or proceedings to attack, set aside, void or annul any
action on the subject application, or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations
taken, done or made prior to said action; and
b. any and all claims, demands, actions, expenses or liabilities arising from or in any
manner relating to the performance of such construction, installation, alteration or
grading work by the Owner and/or Applicant, their successors, or by any person
acting on their behalf.
In addition, prior to any Zoning Clearance from the Community Development Director,
Owner and Applicant shall execute a separate agreement containing the details of this
19
Page 5 of 6
required Agreement to Indemnify, Hold harmless and Defend, which shall be subject to prior
approval as to form and content by the Community Development Director.
B. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
8. Compliance with Plans and Description of Use. The development shall be located and
constructed to include those features, and only those features, as shown on the Approved
Plans and Description of Use dated July 31, 2009 denominated Exhibit "A" and the Photo
Simulations dated July 31, 2009, denominated Exhibit “B. All proposed changes to the
Approved Plans and Description of Use must be submitted in writing with plans showing the
changes, including a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. Such changes shall be
subject to approval in accordance with Condition A.3, above.
9. Harmonizing with Existing Structures. Prior to the installation of the proposed panel
antennas and accessory equipment, the antennas and equipment shall be painted a color
similar to the existing antennas and utility tower subject to approval of the Community
Development Director.
10. Safety Fencing During Construction. During all phases of construction, the Applicant
shall install and maintain temporary safety fencing to restrict or prevent public access to
active on-site construction activities, materials, or chemicals.
11. Emergency Generator. The emergency generator will be tested once a week on Tuesday
between 10:00am and 10:30am or as required by the Bay Area Air Quality District.
12. Building Division Submittal. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans shall be
submitted to the Building Division. These plans shall be subject to review and approval by
the Community Development Department Director or designee prior to issuance of Zoning
Clearance. The construction plans shall, at a minimum include the following:
a. Architectural drawings and other plan sheets consistent with those identified as Exhibit
“A” on file with the Community Development Department and referenced in Condition
No. B.1 above;
b. This signed and dated Resolution printed onto separate construction plan pages;
c. All additional drawings, plans, maps, reports, and/or materials required by the Building
Division
C. REQUIREMENTS OF OTHER AGENCIES OR UTILITIES
13. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Verification. The owner and/or Applicant
for this Project shall contact the FCC and verify whether there are any required permits from
said Commission. If required by the FCC, prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for any
proposed equipment installations (or if none, prior to commencement of the approved use),
the Owner and/or Applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department
documentation from the FCC showing proof of compliance of the proposed use and/or
development with the FCC's requirements.
20
Page 6 of 6
VIII. Appeal
Unless appealed pursuant to the requirements of Article 15-90 of the Saratoga City Code, this
Resolution shall be effective fifteen (15) days from the date of adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission this 12th day of August
2009, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
Yan Zhou
Chair, Planning Commission
ATTEST:
___________________________________
John F. Livingstone, AICP
Secretary to the Planning Commission
ACCEPTANCE BY APPLICANT AND OWNER
This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no
force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant and Property Owner or
Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions
and agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the time
required in this Resolution by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission.
__________________________________ ____________________________
Applicant Date
__________________________________ ____________________________
Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
REPORT TO THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
Meeting Date: July 27, 2011
Application Type / No: Design Review / PDR11-0008
Location: 13686 Quito Road
Owner / Applicant: PG&E / Christian Hill (AT&T)
Staff Planner: Michael Fossati
APN: 403-24-001
Department Head: Chris Riordan, AICP
13686 Quito Road
37
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CASE HISTORY
Application filed: 04/25/11
Application complete: 06/06/11
Notice published: 07/12/11
Mailing completed: 07/05/11
Posting completed: 07/21/11
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting Design Review approval to install three new Long Term Evolution (LTE)
panel antennas, six new Remote Radio Units (RRU), one hidden fiber distribution unit and surge
protector, and associated cellular equipment. The project also includes the installation of a RBS 6601
repeater within the AT&T equipment shelter. The new antennas and associated cellular equipment
would be installed 65 feet above grade onto an existing 115 foot lattice utility tower. There is no
proposed increase of height to the existing tower or shelter to accommodate this project. The gross lot
size is approximately 1.5 acres and is located in the R1-10,000 zoning district.
PERMANENT CONDITIONS
No permanent conditions of approval are required.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Design Review application by adopting the attached Resolution.
38
PROJECT DATA
ZONING: R-1-10,000
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential: M-10
MEASURE G: Not applicable.
PARCEL SIZE: 1.38 acres
AVERAGE SITE SLOPE: <3%
GRADING REQUIRED: None
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed project, which includes installation and replacement of new cellular equipment is
categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303
of the Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA. This Class 3 exemption applies to new construction of
limited small new facilities; installation of small, new equipment and facilities in small structures.
PROJECT DISCUSSION
Site Characteristics and Background
The applicant is requesting Design Review Approval to install three (3) new panel antennas to an
existing Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) lattice tower. The antennas would be installed approximately
65 feet above grade. The height of the existing tower would remain at approximately 115 feet.
Adjacent uses include Highway 85 to the north and west and single-family residential to the south and
east. Currently installed on the tower are antennas from multiple cellular carriers. The most recent
carrier to install cellular antennas on the utility tower was Metro PCS in 2001 (Attachment 2).
The proposal includes the installation of three new LTE antennas. LTE technology claims to increase
data speeds for existing cellular customers with smartphones, computers, and tablets. The dimensions
of the proposed antennas are four and a half feet tall, one foot wide, and six inches deep. The new
antennas are exactly the same size as the existing panel antennas located on the tower. The proposed
antennas would be attached to a new H-frame crossbar, which would be attached to the tower. Six
rectangular boxes, known as RRU’s, would be installed underneath the H-frame crossbar. The RRU’s
are used to remotely change the tilt of the new antennas. Similar to satellite antennas, the placement and
angle of cellular antennas can be manipulated to increase or decrease signal strength. In the past, utility
workers were required to either scale the tower or use a construction boom to access those antennas.
The project also includes the proposed installation of one new GPS antenna to the roof of the existing
equipment shed and associated cellular equipment, such as conduit and cabling. A photo-simulation has
been added to the report to illustrate the new look of the additional antennas and associated equipment
(Attachment 3).
The applicant is proposing the installation of the new antennas in order to upgrade the existing
technology to the new standard, also known as LTE. A wireless coverage map demonstrating the
existing and proposed coverage has been included in this staff report (Attachment 4).
Noise-Generating Devices
No noise-generating devices will be required for the project. The existing equipment shelter is currently
39
equipped to supply the required power for the proposed antenna installation.
Proposed Exterior Materials and Colors
The proposed antennas and associated equipment would be painted to match the existing tower. The
new cabling will be hidden behind a leg of the existing tower.
Alternative Sites
AT&T has multiple sites in Saratoga. AT&T has determined that 13686 Quito Road is an optimal site to
install the proposed antennas due to its location, its existing infrastructure, and its limited visual impact
from the street, in comparison to a singular monopole. The antennas would be installed approximately
65 feet from the ground, placing them out of normal visual range of most pedestrians and property
owners of nearby residences. Per the Coverage Map, there appears to be a significant reduction of data
and network services along the Campbell / Saratoga border at Highway 85. The proposed placement of
the antennas would substantially increase data and network speed for commuters and customers who
reside in those properties discussed above.
FCC Requirements
Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has
exclusive jurisdiction over RF emissions from personal wireless antenna facilities. Pursuant to its
authority under Federal law, the FCC has established rules to regulate the safety of emissions from these
facilities. Any interference to the established rules regulating safety of emissions would be against
Federal law and in violation of AT&T’s FCC License. A condition has been added to the attached
resolution that the applicant must meet all requirements established by the FCC. The applicant has
provided a Radio Frequency (RF) Analysis (Attachment 5) which concludes that the proposed
telecommunications facility would comply with the FCC’s current prevailing standard. Due to the
applicants mounting locations, the antennas would not be accessible to the general public and in
compliance with FCC public exposure guidelines.
Correspondence and Neighbor Review
The applicant mailed (by certified mail) neighborhood notification forms to nearby property owners.
Only one neighbor notification form was returned (Attachment 6) and did not have a response. A public
hearing notice was mailed to 30 property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. Staff has
received no comments to date on this project. Please refer to the complete list of neighbors who were
contacted via the public noticing (Attachment 7).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the proposed wireless facility (Application
PDR11-0008) by adopting the attached Resolution.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution of Approval – PDR11-0008
2. Resolution of Approval – UP-01-010
3. Photo simulations, Exhibit “B”
4. Coverage Map
5. Radio Frequency Analysis
6. Neighbor Notifications
7. Public Hearing Notice, Affidavit and Mailing Label
8. Reduced Plans, Exhibit "A"
40
CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 11-018 FOR APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIEW
Application # PDR 11-0008
AT&T (RealCom) / 13686 Quito Road
The City of Saratoga Planning Commission finds and determines as follows with respect to the
above-described application:
I. Project Summary
The City of Saratoga Planning Commission has received an application for Design Review
Approval for the Project shown in Exhibit "A" including a photo simulation denominated Exhibit
“B” date stamped July 5, 2011, incorporated by this reference. The proposed project is the
installation of three new antennas and associated equipment on an existing utility tower. The
overall number for AT&T would be nine antennas and six Radio Remote Units. The length of the
antennas would be approximately 4 ½ feet tall. The length of the Radio Remote Units would be
approximately 1 ¼ feet tall. The foregoing will be described as the “Project” in this Resolution.
II. Design Review Requirement
City Code Section 15-12.020 (i) and 15-46.020(a) (7) requires Design Review Approval for any
new antenna facility operated by a public utility for transmitting and receiving cellular telephone
and wireless communication. This Design Review Approval requirement implements the Saratoga
General Plan, including but not limited to: Land Use Goal 13 which provides that the City shall use
the Design Review process to assure that new construction and major additions thereto are
compatible with the site and the adjacent surrounding.
III. Planning Commission Review
On July 27, 2011, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing on the Project at
which time all interested parties were given a full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence
and argument. The Planning Commission considered the Project, the staff report on the Project,
CEQA documentation, correspondence, presentation from the Applicant and the public, and all
testimony and other evidence presented at the Public Hearing.
IV. Environmental Review
The Project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines (14 C.C.R. Section 15301), “Existing Facilities”. This exemption
allows for minor modifications involving negligible expansion of use and no exception to that
exemption applies.
V. Design Review Findings
The findings required for issuance of a Design Review Approval pursuant to City Code Section 15-
46.040 are set forth below and the Applicant has met the burden of proof to support making all of
those required findings:
41
2
Application No. PDR 11-0008; 13686 Quito Rd.
(a) Where more than one building or structure will be constructed, the architectural features and
landscaping thereof shall be harmonious. Such features include height, elevations, roofs,
material, color, and appurtenances. The proposed structure will be harmonious in appearance
and design due to their location and placement. The proposed antennas will be installed on an
existing utility tower and unobtrusive as viewed from the street. The proposed antennas and
accessory cabling will be constructed of the same material and painted a color to match the
existing antennas and utility tower structure. This finding can be made in the affirmative.
(b) Where more than one sign will be erected or displayed on the site, the sign shall have a
common or compatible design theme and locational positions and shall be harmonious in
appearance. The project does not include any additional signage for the proposed project. The
project includes antennas, Radio Remote Head (RRH) units, and accessory cellular equipment
to be installed to an existing utility tower. The finding can be made in the affirmative.
(c) Landscaping shall integrate and accommodate existing trees and vegetation to be preserved;
it shall make use of water-conserving plants, materials and irrigation systems to the
maximum extent feasible; and, to the maximum extent feasible, it shall be clustered in
natural appearing groups, as opposed to being placed in rows or regularly spaced. The
applicant (AT&T) currently has a master landscape maintenance agreement with the property
owner (PG&E). The applicant has been consistent in maintaining the existing screening
vegetation along Quito Road. The existing vegetation at the proposed location in vibrant and
lush and located in a natural appearing cluster. The applicant (as conditioned) will continue to
maintain the existing landscape buffer to the satisfaction of the PG&E and the City of Saratoga.
This finding can be made in the affirmative.
(d) Colors of wall and roofing materials shall blend with the natural landscape and be
nonreflective. This project does not propose a wall or roofing materials. The colors of the
materials of the associated equipment will match the existing utility tower, as conditioned. The
colors are muted and non-reflective. This finding can be made in the affirmative.
(e) Roofing materials shall be wood shingles, wood shakes, tile, or other materials such as
composition as approved by the Planning Commission. No mechanical equipment shall be
located upon a roof unless it is appropriately screened. This project does not propose a roof or
roof structure. All associated equipment will be placed on the existing utility tower and be
painted in a similar color. This finding can be made in the affirmative.
(f) The proposed development shall be compatible in terms of height, bulk, and design with other
structures in the immediate area. This project meets this finding in that the proposal will not
substantially add any additional mass to the existing utility tower. The height of the towerwill
not be increased and the installation of the proposed new antennas and Remote Radio Units is
virtually identical to the existing antennas that will be relocated. The design is significantly
unnoticeable from the public right-of-way and will not be a visual distraction to community
members who utilize Quito Road. This finding can be made in the affirmative.
42
3
Application No. PDR 11-0008; 13686 Quito Rd.
VI. Project Approval
After careful consideration of the application, site plan, architectural drawings, and other materials
and exhibits and evidence submitted to the City in connection with this matter, Application No.
PDR 11-0008 (Planning Commission Design Review) for the installation of three wireless panel
antennas and associated equipment is approved subject to the conditions set forth below.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
A. GENERAL
1. The Planning Commission shall retain continuing jurisdiction over the Design Review and
may, at any time, modify, delete, or impose any new conditions of the permit to preserve the
public health, safety, and welfare.
2. Conditions may be modified only by the Planning Commission unless modification is expressly
otherwise allowed by the city code including but not limited to section 16-05.035, as applicable.
3. The Community Development Director shall mail to the Owner/Applicant a notice in writing,
on or after the time this Resolution of Approval is duly executed by the City, containing a
statement of all amounts due to the City in connection with this application, including all
consultant fees (collectively “processing fees”). This approval or permit shall expire sixty
(60) days after the date said notice is mailed if all processing fees contained in the notice
have not been paid in full. No Zoning Clearance or Demolition, Grading, or Building Permit
may be issued until the Community Development Director certifies that all processing fees have
been paid in full (and, for deposit accounts, a surplus balance of $500 is maintained).
4. A Building Permit must be issued and construction commenced within 36 months from the date
of adoption of this Resolution and the Design Review will expire unless extended in accordance
with the City Code.
5. The facility shall at all times operate in compliance with all applicable regulations of the
State, County, City and/or other governmental agencies having jurisdictional authority over
the facility pertaining to, but not limited to, health, sanitation, safety, and water quality
issues. The Project shall maintain compliance with all applicable requirements of the State,
County, City and other governmental entities having jurisdiction.
6. Prior to issuance of any demolition, grading, or building permit to implement this Design
Review approval the Applicant shall obtain a “Zoning Clearance” from the Community
Development Director by submitting final plans for the requested permit to the Community
Development Department for review to ascertain compliance with the requirements of this
Resolution.
7. Agreement to Indemnify, Hold Harmless and Defend City as to Action Challenging
Approval of Application and as to Damage from Performance of Work Authorized by
43
4
Application No. PDR 11-0008; 13686 Quito Rd.
Design Review Approval. As a condition of this Approval, Owner and Applicant hereby agree
to defend, indemnify and hold the City and its officers, officials, boards, commissions,
employees, agents and volunteers harmless from and against:
a. any and all claims, actions or proceedings to attack, set aside, void or annul any
action on the subject application, or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations
taken, done or made prior to said action; and
b. any and all claims, demands, actions, expenses or liabilities arising from or in any
manner relating to the performance of such construction, installation, alteration or
grading work by the Owner and/or Applicant, their successors, or by any person
acting on their behalf.
In addition, prior to any Zoning Clearance from the Community Development Director, Owner
and Applicant shall execute a separate agreement containing the details of this required
Agreement to Indemnify, Hold harmless and Defend, which shall be subject to prior approval
as to form and content by the Community Development Director.
B. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
8. Compliance with Plans. The facility shall be operated, located and constructed to include those
features, and only those features, as shown on the Approved Plans denominated Exhibit "A" and
Photo Simulations denominated Exhibit “B”, date stamped July 5, 2011, incorporated by this
reference. All proposed changes to the Approved Plans must be submitted in writing with plans
showing the changes, including a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. Such changes
shall be subject to the requisite prior City approval.
9. Harmonizing with Existing Structures. Prior to the installation of the proposed panel antennas
and accessory equipment, the equipment shall be painted a color similar to the existing utility
tower and subject to approval of the Community Development Director.
10. Safety Fencing During Construction. During all phases of construction, the Applicant shall
install and maintain temporary safety fencing to restrict or prevent public access to active on-site
construction activities, materials, or chemicals.
11. Decommission. If the subject site is decommissioned in the future, all cellular antennas and
related equipment shall be removed within 30 days of cessation of operation.
12. Governmental entities. All applicable requirements of the State, County, City and other
Governmental entities, including the California Public Utilities Commission, must be met.
13. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Verification. The owner and/or Applicant for
this Project shall contact the FCC and verify whether there are any required permits from said
Commission. If required by the FCC, prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance for any proposed
equipment installations (or if none, prior to commencement of the approved use), the Owner
44
5
Application No. PDR 11-0008; 13686 Quito Rd.
and/or Applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department documentation from
the FCC showing proof of compliance of the proposed use and/or development with the FCC's
requirements.
14. Fire Agency Conditions. The Owner / Applicant shall comply with all Fire Agency
Conditions.
15. Building Department. The Owner / Applicant shall comply with all building standards
including any improvements necessary to comply with the building code.
16. Emergency Access. The owner / applicant shall provide a 24-hour phone number to which
interference problems may be reported, and will resolve all interference complaints within 24
hours from the time the interference was reported.
45
6
Application No. PDR 11-0008; 13686 Quito Rd.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission this 27th day of July 2011 by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
Douglas R. Robertson
Chair, Planning Commission
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Christopher A. Riordan, AICP
Secretary to the Planning Commission
ACCEPTANCE BY APPLICANT AND OWNER
This permit is hereby accepted upon the express terms and conditions hereof, and shall have no
force or effect unless and until agreed to, in writing, by the Applicant and Property Owner or
Authorized Agent. The undersigned hereby acknowledges the approved terms and conditions and
agrees to fully conform to and comply with said terms and conditions within the time required in
this Resolution by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission.
__________________________________ ____________________________
Applicant Date
__________________________________ ____________________________
Property Owner or Authorized Agent Date
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
CITY OF SARATOGA
Community Development Department
13777 Fruitvale Avenue
Saratoga, CA 95070
(408) 868-1222
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The City of Saratoga’s Planning Commission announces the following public hearing on:
Wednesday, the 27th day of July 2011, at 7:00 p.m.
The public hearing will be held in the City Hall Theater located at 13777 Fruitvale Avenue. The
public hearing agenda item is stated below. Details of this item are available at the Saratoga
Community Development Department, Monday through Friday 7:30 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Please
consult the City website at www.saratoga.ca.us regarding Friday office closures.
APPLICATION/ADDRESS: PDR11-0008 / 13686 Quito Road
APPLICANT/OWNER: Christian Hill in c/o AT&T
APN: 403-24-001
DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Design Review approval to install three new Long
Term Evolution (LTE) panel antennas, six new Remote Radio Units (RRU), one hidden fiber
distribution unit and surge protector, and associated cellular equipment. The project also
includes the installation of a RBS 6601 repeater within the AT&T equipment shelter. The new
antennas and associated cellular equipment would be installed 65 feet above grade onto an
existing 115 foot lattice utility tower. There is no proposed increase of height to the existing
tower or shelter to accommodate this project. The gross lot size is approximately 1.5 acres and is
located in the R1-10,000 zoning district.
All interested persons may appear and be heard at the above time and place. If you challenge a
decision of the Planning Commission pursuant to a Public Hearing in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing. In order for information
to be included in the Planning Commission’s information packets, written communications should
be filed on or before Tuesday, July 12th 2011.
This notice has been sent to all owners of property within 500 feet of the project that is the subject
of this notice. The City uses the official roll produced by the County Assessor’s office annually, in
preparing its notice mailing lists. In some cases, out-of-date information or difficulties with the U.S.
Postal Service may result in notices not being delivered to all residents potentially affected by a
project. If you believe that your neighbors would be interested in the project described in this
notice, we encourage you to provide them with a copy of this notice. This will ensure that everyone
in your Community has as much information as possible concerning this project.
Michael Fossati
Assistant Planner
(408) 868-1212
62
Parcel Number Parcel Address Owner Name Owner Address Owner City, State Zip38919037 13561 QUITO RD CALIFORNIA STATE OF 13561 QUITO RD SARATOGA, CA 9507038925002 18515 ASPESI DR BALOG STEVEN W AND BARBARA E 18515 ASPESI DR SARATOGA, CA 9507038925003 18529 ASPESI DR PAKDEL HESAMEDDIN AND STEPHANI 18529 ASPESI DR SARATOGA, CA 9507038925004 18541 ASPESI DR PILLSBURY PATRICK L AND LINDA 18541 ASPESI DR SARATOGA, CA 9507038925005 18553 ASPESI DR RECKWERDT BILL JR AND TAEKO 18553 ASPESI DR SARATOGA, CA 9507038925006 18565 ASPESI DR RIZZO MARK A AND THERESE A D 18565 ASPESI DR SARATOGA, CA 9507038925008 18581 LYONS CT WALLS JUDITH S 18581 LYONS CT SARATOGA, CA 9507038925039 18570 ASPESI DR URROZ FERNANDO J AND CYNTHIA J 18570 ASPESI DR SARATOGA, CA 9507038925040 18556 ASPESI DR CRICCHIO SALVATORE J 18556 ASPESI DR SARATOGA, CA 9507038925041 18542 ASPESI DR PEEKS ROBERT A AND ROCKESANDA 18542 ASPESI DR SARATOGA, CA 9507038925042 18528 ASPESI DR CIMLOV BORIS AND RENATE TRUSTE 18528 ASPESI DR SARATOGA, CA 9507038925043 18514 ASPESI DR NATAEGHIAN FARAMARZ TRUSTEE 18514 ASPESI DR SARATOGA, CA 9507038925044 13675 QUITO RD SHAFAZAND MAHNAZ 13675 QUITO RD SARATOGA, CA 9507038925045 13685 QUITO RD ABHARI HASSAN S AND JAMIE C 13685 QUITO RD SARATOGA, CA 9507038925046 13687 QUITO RD HASSAN NUR M AND JOYCE F TRUST 13687 QUITO RD SARATOGA, CA 9507038925047 13689 QUITO RD BENNION HOWARD B AND JOAN B 13689 QUITO RD SARATOGA, CA 9507038925048 13701 QUITO RD BROWN BRETT AND CARRIE TRUSTEE 13701 QUITO RD SARATOGA, CA 9507038925050 13695 QUITO RD CITTA RONALD J AND MARCIA TRUS 13695 QUITO RD SARATOGA, CA 9507038926001 13737 QUITO RD JENSEN GORDON E AND CHERIEL M 13737 QUITO RD SARATOGA, CA 9507038926025 18506 MONTPERE WY ALAMEDA A ALAN AND ELISABETH D P O BOX 2204 SARATOGA, CA 9507038926027 18485 MONTPERE WY RANDOLPH DONALD F AND GAIL M 18485 MONTPERE WY SARATOGA, CA 9507040323023 18407 MONTPERE WY CRANE DANIEL B AND LILLIAN 18407 MONTPERE WY SARATOGA, CA 9507040323028 18406 MONTPERE WY HUANG JOE C AND JOAN 18406 MONTPERE WY SARATOGA, CA 9507040323032 13821 RAVENWOOD DR JENSEN FLORENCE H TRUSTEE 13821 RAVENWOOD DR SARATOGA, CA 9507040323055 13824 ESPADA CT MCGRATH LEE M AND JOAN M 13824 ESPADA CT SARATOGA, CA 9507040323064 S C V W D 5750 ALMADEN EX SAN JOSE, CA 9511840324008 13686 QUITO RD ASSOCIATES I, A PARTNERSHIP 4966 EL CAMINO REAL UNIT #209 LOS ALTOS, CA 9402240324012 18250 MONTPERE WY FUKUI BILLY S AND YURIYE TRUST 18250 MONTPERE WY SARATOGA, CA 9507040324014 18247 MONTPERE WY KUFER STEPHEN J AND SUSAN E TR 18247 MONTPERE WY SARATOGA, CA 9507040324016 18291 MONTPERE WY JOHANSEN KIM A AND BATTAGLIA M 18291 MONTPERE WY SARATOGA, CA 9507030 Parcels Notified63
64