Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-27-18 Planning Commission Agenda PacketSaratoga Planning Commission Agenda – Page 1 of 3 SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JUNE 27, 2018 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Civic Theater | 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga CA 95070 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES Action Minutes from the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of May 9, 2018. Recommended Action: Approve Minutes of May 9, 2018 meeting. 050918 Draft Minutes ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS Any member of the public will be allowed to address the Planning Commission for up to three (3) minutes on matters not on this agenda. This law generally prohibits the Planning Commission from discussing or taking action on such items. However, the Planning Commission may instruct staff accordingly regarding Oral Communications. REPORT ON APPEAL RIGHTS If you wish to appeal any decision on this Agenda, you may file an Appeal Application with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of the decision. 1. NEW BUSINESS 2. PUBLIC HEARING Applicants and/or their representatives have a total of ten (10) minutes maximum for opening statements. All interested persons may appear and be heard during this meeting regarding the items on this agenda. If items on this agenda are challenged in court, members of the public may be limited to raising only issues raised at the Public Hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to the close of the Public Hearing. Members of the public may comment on any item for up to three (3) minutes. Applicants and/or their representatives have a total of five (5) minutes maximum for closing statements. 2.1. Application PDR17-0024/ARB17-0065; 20381 Zorka Avenue (APN 386-52-047); Lands of Patel. The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct a new two- story single-family residence with a maximum height 25.60’. No protected trees are requested for removal. Saratoga Planning Commission Agenda – Page 2 of 3 The site is zoned R-1-10,000 and is 10,313 gross square feet in size. Staff Contact: Christopher Riordan (408) 868-1235 or criordan@saratoga.ca.us Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No.18-009 approving the project subject to conditions of approval included in Attachment 1. Staff Report 20381 Zorka Ave. Attachment 1 Resolution of Approval No. 18-009 Attachment 2 - Arborist Report dated February 2, 2018 Attachment 3 - Story Pole Certification Letter Attachment 4 - Development Plans (received June 4, 2018) 2.2. Application PDR18-0003/VAR18-0002; 14362 Springer Avenue (APN 503-26-032); Lands of Bahl. The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct a new two- story single-family residence with a basement. The maximum height of the project is 24.6’. The project also includes a variance for a one-car garage when a two-car garage is required. No trees are requested for removal. The site is zoned R-1-10,000 and is 3,454 gross square feet in size. Staff Contact: Christopher Riordan (408) 868-1235 or criordan@saratoga.ca.us Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No.18-010 approving the project subject to conditions of approval included in Attachment 1. Staff Report 14362 Springer Ave. Attachment 1 - Resolution of Approval No. 18-010 Attachment 2 - Neighbor Review Forms Attachment 3 - Previously Approved Building Elevations Attachment 4 - Development Plans (received June 6, 2018) 2.3. Application PDR17-0016/ARB17-0059; 15235 Bellecourt (APN 510-03-013); Lands of Zhang. The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct a new two-story single-family residence with a maximum height 24’. Four protected trees are proposed for removal. The site is zoned R-1-40,000 and is 35,283 gross square feet in size. Staff Contact: Christopher Riordan (408) 868-1235 or criordan@saratoga.ca.us Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No.18-011 approving the project subject to conditions of approval included in Attachment 1. Staff Report 15235 Bellecourt Attachment 1 Resolution of Approval No. 18-011 Attachment 2 - Arborist Report dated May 22, 2018 Attachment 3 - Development Plans (received June 8, 2018) DIRECTOR ITEMS COMMISSION ITEMS ADJOURNMENT Saratoga Planning Commission Agenda – Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF POSTING OF THE AGENDA I, Janet Costa, Administrative Assistant for the City of Saratoga, declare that the foregoing agenda for the meeting of the Planning Commission was posted and available for public review on June 21, 2018 at the City of Saratoga, 13777 Fruitvale Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070 and on the City’s website at www.saratoga.ca.us. Signed this 21st day of June 2018 at Saratoga, California. Janet Costa, Administrative Assistant In Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at 408/868-1269. Notification 24 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA title II] You can also sign up to receive email notifications when Commission agendas and minutes have been added to the City at website http://www.saratoga.ca.us/contact/email_subscriptions.asp. NOTE: To view previous Planning Commission meetings anytime, go the City Video Archives at www.saratoga.ca.us Saratoga Planning Commission Agenda – Page 1 of 3 SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING ACTION MINUTES MAY 9, 2018 7:00 P.M. - PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Joan Pisani Community Center, Multipurpose Room | 19655 Allendale Avenue, Saratoga CA 95070 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chair Joyce Hlava, Vice Chair Kookie Fitzsimmons, Commissioners Sunil Ahuja, Razi Mohiuddin, Len Almalech, Tina Walia, Lucas Pastuszka ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Debbie Pedro, Community Development Director Christopher Riordan, Senior Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES Action Minutes from the Regular Planning Commission Meeting of April 25, 2018. Recommended Action: Approve Minutes of April 25, 2018 regular meeting. FITZSIMMONS/WALIA MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 25, 2018. MOTION PASSED. AYES: WALIA, HLAVA, AHUJA, FITZSIMMONS, MOHIUDDIN ALMALECH, PASTUSZKA. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. 1. NEW BUSINESS 1.1. Proposed Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) for FY 2018/2019. Recommended Action: Staff recommends the Commission adopt the attached Resolution #18-008 finding the proposed CIP projects conform to the general plan. WALIA/PASTUSZKA MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 18-008 DETERMINING THAT THE NEW FY 18-19 CIP PROJECTS CONFORM TO THE GENERAL PLAN. MOTION PASSED. AYES: WALIA, HLAVA, AHUJA, FITZSIMMONS, MOHIUDDIN ALMALECH, PASTUSZKA. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. 4 Saratoga Planning Commission Agenda – Page 2 of 3 2. PUBLIC HEARING Applicants and/or their representatives have a total of ten (10) minutes maximum for opening statements. All interested persons may appear and be heard during this meeting regarding the items on this agenda. If items on this agenda are challenged in court, members of the public may be limited to raising only issues raised at the Public Hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to the close of the Public Hearing. Members of the public may comment on any item for up to three (3) minutes. Applicants and/or their representatives have a total of five (5) minutes maximum for closing statements. 2.1. Application PDR17-0015/ARB17-0022/ARB17-0037; 20142 Williamsburg Lane (APN 386-390-024); Lands of Stetak. The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct a new one-story single-family residence with a maximum height 19.29’. No protected trees are requested for removal. The site is zoned R-1-12,500 and is 12,600 gross square feet in size. Staff Contact: Christopher Riordan (408) 868-1235 or criordan@saratoga.ca.us Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No.18-006 approving the project subject to conditions of approval included in Attachment 1. ALMALECH/FITZSIMMONS MOVED TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. MOTION PASSED. AYES: WALIA, HLAVA, AHUJA, ALMALECH, FITZSIMMONS, MOHIUDDIN, PASTUSZKA. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. 2.2. Application PDR17-0023/ARB17-0061; 19891 Robin Way (APN 510-01-036); Lands of Salek. The applicant requests Design Review approval to construct a new one- story single-family residence with a maximum height of 23’-3 1/4”. Two trees are proposed for removal which includes a 15” Magnolia and a 17” Mayten. The site is zoned R-1-20,000 and is 33,350 gross square feet in size. Staff Contact: Christopher Riordan (408) 868-1235 or criordan@saratoga.ca.us Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No.18-007 approving the project subject to conditions of approval included in Attachment 1. WALIA/PASTUSZKA MOVED TO APPROVE WITH AMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. MOTION PASSED. AYES: WALIA, HLAVA, AHUJA, ALMALECH, FITZSIMMONS, MOHIUDDIN, PASTUSZKA. NOES: NONE. ABSENT: NONE. ABSTAIN: NONE. DIRECTOR ITEMS Director Pedro announced cancellation of May 23rd meeting. COMMISSION ITEMS Vice Chair Fitzsimmons thanked everyone for supporting the Saratoga Rotary Art Show. 5 Saratoga Planning Commission Agenda – Page 3 of 3 ADJOURNMENT Vice Chair Fitzsimmons adjourned the meeting at 7:35 PM. Minutes respectfully submitted: Janet Costa, Administrative Assistant City of Saratoga 6 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 20381 Zorka Avenue Meeting Date: June 27, 2018 Application: PDR17-0024/ARB17-0065 Address/APN: 20381 Zorka Avenue (386-52-047) Property Owner: Dami & Kirit Patel From: Debbie Pedro, Community Development Director Report Prepared By: Christopher Riordan 7 Report to the Planning Commission 20381 Zorka Avenue – Application # PDR17-0024/ARB17-0065 June 27, 2018 Page | 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a new 3,369 square foot two story residence. No protected trees are proposed for removal. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No.18-009 approving the project subject to conditions of approval included in Attachment 1. Pursuant to City Code Section 15-45.060 (a)(1), Design Review Approval by the Planning Commission is required because the project is a new two-story residence. PROJECT DATA Gross/Net Site Area: 10,313 sq. ft. gross/net (0.24 acres) Average Site Slope: Level Site General Plan Designation: M-10 (Medium Density Residential) Zoning: R-1-10,000 Proposed Allowed/Required Proposed Site Coverage Residence/Garage Walkways/Decks Driveway Pool Total Proposed (structures) 3,565.4 sq. ft. 1,214.2 sq. ft. 773.7 sq. ft. 429.7 sq. ft. 5,983 sq. ft. (58%) 6,188 sq. ft. (60%) Floor Area First Story Second Story Garage Total Floor Area 1,795.0 sq. ft. 1,117.3 sq. ft. 456.8 sq. ft. 3,369.1 sq. ft. 3,370 sq. ft. Height 25.60’ 26’ Setbacks Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: 1st Story 2nd Story 25’3” 25’3” 21’8” 28’9.5” 13’11” 18’7” N/A N/A 1st Story 2nd Story 25’ 25’ 10’ 15’ 10’ 15’ N/A* Grading Cut 208.5 CY Fill 0 CY Export 208.5 CY No grading limit in the R-1-10,000 zoning district * A lot bounded by only three lot lines does not have a rear lot line 8 Report to the Planning Commission 20381 Zorka Avenue – Application # PDR17-0024/ARB17-0065 June 27, 2018 Page | 3 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Site Description The project site is located at 20381 Zorka Avenue between Seagull Way and Ted Avenue. A 4,479 square foot one story ranch style single-family home and related site improvements including a swimming pool are located on site. Adjacent uses on both sides, to the rear, and across the street consist of one-story single family residences. Eight trees were inventoried by the project arborist including a Coast live oak, Modesto Ash, and Camphor. Project Description The project would include the construction of a new 3,361 square feet, approximately 25.6’ tall, two-story single family residence with an attached two car garage. All structures and hardscape would be removed with the exception of the swimming pool and related mechanical equipment. No trees are proposed for removal. Architecture/Design The project would have a “modern” architectural style. The proposed project would be a variant of the modern style featuring an orthogonal box, or boxes, designed with a variety of wall-cladding textures and materials. Commonly used materials can include metal or wood siding, wood applied in differing ways, concrete, and stucco – all in combination with glass. The pattern created by the choice of exterior materials is a primary element of the design. The building footprint is rectangular in shape with a wide front façade that extends the length of the building envelope and follows the curve of the front property line. The second story element is located in the center of the site as well as the building footprint with the first story element projecting out towards both sides to increase the architectural compatibility with neighboring one story structures. Architectural materials to support the architectural style include stucco, metal, vertical wood siding, and a flat roof with metal overhangs over the front entrance and rear deck. A 2.5 feet tall metal roof parapet would be located along the perimeter of both the first and second stories with an additional rectangular shaped parapet at the top of the building as an architectural defining feature. Large rectangular aluminum framed windows characterize both the front and rear facades with smaller similar shaped windows on both side elevations. The variety of exterior materials, varying heights of the architectural features and the wide building footprint provide architectural articulation to break up the mass of the home and improve its compatibility with structures on adjacent sites. The applicant has provided a color and materials board that will be available for review at the site visit and during the public hearing. Below is a list of the proposed exterior materials. Detail Colors and Materials Exterior Stain Grade Cedar Siding / White Colored Smooth Stucco Windows Black Colored Aluminum Windows Doors Dark Gray Metal Front Entrance Door Black Colored Aluminum Garage Door with Obscure Glass Panels Roof Standing Seam Metal Roof 9 Report to the Planning Commission 20381 Zorka Avenue – Application # PDR17-0024/ARB17-0065 June 27, 2018 Page | 4 Trees No protected trees are proposed for removal with this application. All protected trees to remain in the vicinity of the project would be protected prior to building permit issuance and throughout the duration of the project. Tree protection fencing is required to be installed prior to the issuance of building permits. Details of the arborist’s findings and descriptions of the trees to be preserved are included in the Arborist Report (Attachment 2). FINDINGS The findings required for issuance of a Design Review Approval pursuant to City Code Section Article 15-45.080 are set forth below and the Applicant has met the burden of proof to support making all of those required findings: a. Site development follows the natural contours of the site, minimizes grading, and is appropriate given the property’s natural constraints. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the project minimizes changes to the contours of the site. Grading will be limited to contouring the site to direct water to landscaped areas. Grading is also reduced as the new structure will be located in the same location as the existing structure with no significant change in the finished floor elevation. b. All protected trees shall be preserved, as provided in Article 15-50 (Tree Regulations). If constraints exist on the property, the number of protected trees, heritage trees, and native trees approved for removal shall be reduced to an absolute minimum. Removal of any smaller oak trees deemed to be in good health by the City Arborist shall be minimized using the criteria set forth in Section 15-50.080. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that no protected trees are proposed for removal. All protected trees in the vicinity of the project would be protected prior to building permit issuance and throughout the duration of the project. Tree protection fencing is required to be installed prior to the issuance of building permits. c. The height of the structure, its location on the site, and its architectural elements are designed to avoid unreasonable impacts to the privacy of adjoining properties and to community viewsheds. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that though the project is a two story structure, the second story element is smaller than the first story with first story eaves and roof lines consistent in height with adjacent residences. The finished floor of the new structure would be approximately the same elevation as the existing structure. The project would have second story windows that face side properties but these windows are reduced in size with setbacks that exceed the minimum for second stories. No community view sheds are located in the vicinity of the project. 10 Report to the Planning Commission 20381 Zorka Avenue – Application # PDR17-0024/ARB17-0065 June 27, 2018 Page | 5 d. The overall mass and height of the structure, and its architectural elements are in scale with the structure itself and with the neighborhood. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that even though the project is a two story residence in a one story neighborhood, the project concentrates the massing toward the center of the site with the height concentrated toward the middle of the building footprint and is lower at both sides to increase compatibility with neighboring one story homes. The project includes architectural elements consistent with the ‘modern’ architectural style which are in scale with the structure and the neighborhood. e. The landscape design minimizes hardscape in the front setback area and contains elements that are complementary to the neighborhood streetscape. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the existing landscaping is proposed to remain. Hardscape would be less than 50% of the front setback area and limited to a concrete driveway and walkway. f. Development of the site does not unreasonably impair the ability of adjoining properties to utilize solar energy. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the tallest elements of the structure are located at the center of the site with the lower portions of the building at both side property lines, the structure would not unreasonably impair the utilization of solar energy. g. The design of the structure and the site development plan is consistent with the Residential Design Handbook, pursuant to Section 15-45.055. This finding can be made in the affirmative because the proposed project incorporates applicable design policies and techniques from the Residential Design Handbook. The overall mass and height of the structure are greater than surrounding homes but these differences are tempered through the use of appropriate massing and horizontal building forms; the structure is sited in proportion to the size and shape of the lot; site development follows contours and is appropriate given the property’s natural constraints. In addition, the proposed materials, colors, and details enhance the architecture in a well-composed manner which is complementary to the architectural style of the home. h. On hillside lots, the location and the design of the structure avoid unreasonable impacts to ridgelines, significant hillside features, community viewsheds, and is in compliance with Section 15-13.100. This finding is not applicable to the project as the site is not considered a hillside lot. Neighbor Notification and Correspondence A public notice was sent to property owners within 500 feet of the site. In addition, the public hearing notice and description of the project was published in the Saratoga News. The applicant 11 Report to the Planning Commission 20381 Zorka Avenue – Application # PDR17-0024/ARB17-0065 June 27, 2018 Page | 6 provided seven completed Neighbor Notification Forms – none of the forms included negative project related concerns. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures”, Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction of three single-family residences in a residential area. The project, as proposed, is for the construction of a new residence in a suburban, residential area. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution of Approval No. 18-009 2. Arborist Report dated February 2, 2018 3. Story Pole Certification dated (insert date when received) 4. Development Plans (received June 4, 2018) 12 RESOLUTION NO: 18-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW PDR17-0024 AND ARBORIST REPORT ARB17-0065 20381 ZORKA AVENUE APN #386-52-047 WHEREAS, on December 21, 2017 an application was submitted by Irena Veljovic on behalf of Dami and Kirit Patel requesting Design Review approval to construct a new 3,369 square foot two- story residence with associated site improvements located 20381 Zorka Avenue (APN 386-52-047). The height of the proposed residence is approximately 25.6 feet. No protected trees are proposed for removal. The site is located within the R-1-10,000 zoning district. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department completed an environmental assessment for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and recommends that the Planning Commission determine this project Categorically Exempt. WHEREAS, on June 27, 2018 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application, and considered evidence presented by City Staff, the applicant, and other interested parties. NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows: Section 1: The recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: The project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures”, Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction of one single-family residence in a residential area. Section 3: The project is consistent with the following Saratoga General Plan Policies: Land Use Goal 13 which provides that the City shall use the Design Review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings; Safety Element Site and Drainage Policy 3 which provides that the City shall require that landscaping and site drainage plans be submitted and approved during Design Review for a residence prior to issuance of permits; and Conservation Element Policy 6.0 which provides that the City shall protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. Section 4: The project is consistent with the Saratoga City Code in that the design and improvements are consistent with the design review findings. The overall mass and height of the structure are in scale with the neighborhood; the structure is set back in proportion to the size and shape of the lot; site development follows contours and is appropriate given the property’s natural constraints; the porch and entry are in scale with other structures in the neighborhood. In addition, the proposed materials, colors, and details enhance the architecture in a well-composed, understated manner. Section 5: The City of Saratoga Planning Commission hereby approves PDR17-0024 and ARB17-0065 located at 20381 Zorka Avenue (APN 386-52-047), subject to the Findings, and Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Attachment 1 13 Lands of Kirit 20381 Zorka Avenue Application #PDR17-0024ARB17-0065 Resolution #18-009 Page | 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on this 27th day of May 2018 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ____________________________ Joyce Hlava Chair, Planning Commission 14 Lands of Kirit 20381 Zorka Avenue Application #PDR17-0024ARB17-0065 Resolution #18-009 Page | 3 Exhibit 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PDR17-0024 & ARB17-0065 20381 ZORKA AVENUE (APN 386-52-047) GENERAL 1. All conditions below which are identified as permanent or for which an alternative period of time for applicability is specified shall run with the land and apply to the landowner’s successors in interest for such time period. No zoning clearance, or demolition, grading for this project shall be issued until proof is filed with the city that a certificate of approval documenting all applicable permanent or other term-specified conditions has been recorded by the applicant with the Santa Clara County Recorder’s office in form and content to the Community Development Director. If a condition is not “Permanent” or does not have a term specified, it shall remain in effect until the issuance by the City of Saratoga of a Certificate of Occupancy or its equivalent. 2. The Owner and Applicant will be mailed a statement after the time the Resolution granting this approval is duly executed, containing a statement of all amounts due to the City in connection with this application, including all consultant fees (collectively “processing fees”). This approval or permit shall expire sixty (60) days after the date said notice is mailed if all processing fees contained in the notice have not been paid in full. No Zoning Clearance or Demolition, Grading, or Building Permit may be issued until the City certifies that all processing fees have been paid in full (and, for deposit accounts, a surplus balance of $500 is maintained). 3. The Project shall maintain compliance with all applicable regulations of the State, County, City and/or other governmental agencies having jurisdiction including, without limitation, the requirements of the Saratoga City Code incorporated herein by this reference. 4. As a condition of this Approval, Owner and Applicant hereby agree to defend, indemnify and hold the City and its officers, officials, boards, commissions, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from and against: a. any and all claims, actions or proceedings to attack, set aside, void or annul any action on the subject application, or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done or made prior to said action; and b. any and all claims, demands, actions, expenses or liabilities arising from or in any manner relating to the performance of such construction, installation, alteration or grading work by the Owner and/or Applicant, their successors, or by any person acting on their behalf. In addition, prior to any Zoning Clearance, Owner and Applicant shall execute a separate agreement containing the details of this required Agreement to Indemnify, Hold Harmless and Defend, which shall be subject to prior approval as to form and content by the City Attorney. 15 Lands of Kirit 20381 Zorka Avenue Application #PDR17-0024ARB17-0065 Resolution #18-009 Page | 4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 5. The owner/applicant shall comply with all City requirements regarding drainage, including but not limited to complying with the city approved Stormwater management plan. The project shall retain and/or detain any increase in design flow from the site, that is created by the proposed construction and grading project, such that adjacent down slope properties will not be negatively impacted by any increase in flow. Design must follow the current Santa Clara County Drainage Manual method criteria, as required by the building department. Retention/detention element design must follow the Drainage Manual guidelines, as required by the building department. 6. The development shall be located and constructed to include those features, and only those features, as shown on the Approved Plans date stamped June 8, 2018. All proposed changes to the approved plans must be submitted in writing with plans showing the changes, including a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. Such changes shall be subject to approval in accordance with City Code. 7. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit for staff approval, a Lighting Plan for the home’s exterior and landscaped areas. Proposed exterior lighting shall be limited to full-cut off & shielded fixtures with downward directed illumination so as not to shine on adjacent properties or public right-of-way. All proposed exterior lighting shall be designed to limit illumination to the site and avoid creating glare impacts to surrounding properties. 8. In order to comply with standards that minimize impacts to the neighborhood during site preparation and construction, the applicant shall comply with City Code Sections 7-30.060 and 16-75.050, with respect to noise, construction hours, maintenance of the construction site and other requirements stated in these sections. 9. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall prepare for review and approval by City staff a Construction Management Plan for the project which includes but is not limited to the following: a. Proposed construction worker parking area. b. Proposed construction hours that are consistent with City Code. c. Proposed construction/delivery vehicle staging or parking areas. d. Proposed traffic control plan with traffic control measures, any street closure, hours for delivery/earth moving or hauling, etc. To the extent possible, any deliveries, earth moving or hauling activities will be scheduled to avoid peak commute hours. e. Proposed construction material staging/storage areas. f. Location of project construction sign outlining permitted construction work hours, name of project contractor and the contact information for both homeowner and contractor. 10. All fences, walls and hedges shall conform to height requirements provided in City Code Section 15-29. 11. The final landscaping and irrigation plan submitted for Building Permit approval shall demonstrate how the project complies with the State Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and shall take into account the following: a. To the extent feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that 16 Lands of Kirit 20381 Zorka Avenue Application #PDR17-0024ARB17-0065 Resolution #18-009 Page | 5 provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. b. To the extent feasible, pest resistant landscaping plants shall be used throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. c. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. d. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. e. Any proposed or required under grounding of utilities shall take into account potential damage to roots of protected trees 12. A locking mailbox approved for use by the U.S. Postal service shall be installed and in compliance with Saratoga Municipal Code section 6-25.030. The mailbox shall be installed prior to final inspection. FIRE DEPARTMENT 13. The owner/applicant shall comply with all Fire Department requirements. ARBORIST 14. All requirements in the City Arborist Report dated February 2, 2018 are hereby adopted as conditions of approval and shall be implemented as part of the approved plans. PUBLIC WORKS 15. Applicant / Owner shall obtain an encroachment permit for any and all improvements in any City right-of-way or City easement including all new utilities prior to commencement of the work to implement this Design Review. 16. Applicant / Owner shall remove and replace existing dip and settled asphalt driveway approach with a new one conforming to existing adjoining grade. 17. Applicant / Owner shall remove and replace existing curb and gutter fronting Zorka Avenue with new vertical curb and gutter with new approach and driveway. 18. The new approach and driveway shall conform to existing adjoining grade. See Saratoga Standard details for removal and new installation. Removal of existing curb & gutter shall be from joint to joint within the property line. The new flow line shall conform to existing flow lines and grade. See City Standard details for removal and new installation. 19. Curb and gutter shall be placed over a minimum of six inches (6”) of base. It shall be compacted to 95% relative compaction before placing concrete. See City of Saratoga Standard details 20. All existing utilities to existing home (Gas, Electric, Water, Sewer) shall be capped off prior to demolition of existing structures. Shown on plan all new utilities services to the new residence. All 17 Lands of Kirit 20381 Zorka Avenue Application #PDR17-0024ARB17-0065 Resolution #18-009 Page | 6 utilities to the new residence shall be installed underground. New water meter require for Fire suppression system to new residence. 21. Provide a site grading and drainage plan prepared by a licensed Civil engineer. 22. The site grading plan shall include but not be limited to the following:  The ground immediately adjacent to the foundation shall be sloped away from the building at a slope not less than 5 percent for a distance of 10 feet measured perp endicular to the face of the wall.  If physical obstructions or lot lines prohibit 10 feet of horizontal distance, a 5 percent slope shall be provided to an approved alternative method of diverting water away from foundation. Swales used for this purpose shall be sloped a minimum of 2 percent where located within 10 feet of the building foundation  Impervious surfaces within 10 feet of the building foundation shall be sloped a minimum of 2 percent away from the building. 23. Applicant / Owner shall maintain the streets, sidewalks and other public right of way in a clean, safe and usable condition. All spills of soil, rock or construction debris shall be removed from the public property. All adjacent property, both public and private, shall be maintained in a cle an, safe and usable condition 24. The Project Civil Engineer shall design this project to comply with the grading recommendations in the geotechnical report. 25. All grading and earthwork activities shall conform to the approved plans and specifications. All grading and earthwork activities shall be observed and approved by the Civil Engineer. The Civil Engineer shall be notified at least 48 hours prior to any grading or earthwork activities. Unobserved or unapproved work shall be removed and replaced under observation of the project soil engineer. 26. All new/upgraded utilities shall be installed underground. 27. Applicant / Owner shall maintain the streets, sidewalks and other right of way as well as adjacent properties, both public and private, in a clean, safe and u sable condition. All spills of soil, rock or construction debris shall be removed immediately. 28. Applicant / Owner shall submit a site plan and associated calculations for storm water treatment measures in compliance with NPDES Permit No. CAS612008, Novemb er 19, 2015 Provision C.3.i. Required Site Design Measures for Small Projects and Detached Single-Family Home Projects. Applicant / Owner shall require all development projects, which create and /or replace greater or equal 2,500 square feet to 10,000 square feet of impervious surface, and detached single- family home projects, which create and or replace 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface, to install one or more of the following site design measures including: 1. Direct runoff onto vegetated areas 2. Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios onto vegetated areas. 3. Direct runoff from driveways and/or uncovered parking lots onto vegetated areas. 18 Lands of Kirit 20381 Zorka Avenue Application #PDR17-0024ARB17-0065 Resolution #18-009 Page | 7 4. Construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces. 5. Bio retention basin 29. The Owner/Applicant shall incorporate adequate source control measures to limit pollutant generation, discharge, and runoff (e.g. landscaping that minimizes irrigation and runoff, promotes surface infiltration where possible, minimizes the use of pesticides and fertilizers, and incorporates appropriate sustainable landscaping practices and programs, such as Bay-Friendly Landscaping). 30. All grading and earthwork activities shall conform to the approved plans and specifications. All grading and earthwork activities shall be observed and approved by the soils engineer. The soils engineer shall be notified at least 48 hours prior to any grading or earthwork activities. Unobserved or unapproved work shall be removed and replaced under observation of the project soil engineer. 31. Construction Site Control  Owner shall implement construction site inspection and control to prevent construction site discharges of pollutants into the storm drains per approved Erosion Control Plan.  The City requires the construction sites to mai ntain year-round effective erosion control, run- on and run-off control, sediment control, good site management, and non -storm water management through all phases of construction (including, but not limited to, site grading, building, and finishing of lots) until the site is fully stabilized by landscaping or the installation of permanent erosion control measures.  City will conduct inspections to determine compliance and determine the effectiveness of the BMPs in preventing the discharge of construction pollutants into the storm drain. Owner shall be required to timely correct all actual and potential discharges observed.  Owner shall implement construction site inspection and control to prevent  32. Prior to the Building final, all Public works conditions including drainage, grading, and landscaping of the site shall be completed per approved plans. BUILDING DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL 33. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans shall be submitted to the Building Division. These plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance. The construction plans shall, at a minimum include the following: a. Architectural drawings and other plan sheets consistent with those identified as Exhibit “A” on file with the Community Development Department. b. Arborist Report, dated February 2, 2018 printed onto a separate plan page. c. All additional drawings, plans, maps, reports, notes, and/or materials required by the Building Division. c. This signed and dated Resolution printed onto separate construction plan pages. d. The site plan shall contain a note with the following language: “Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the Licensed Land Surveyor of record shall provide a written certification that all 19 Lands of Kirit 20381 Zorka Avenue Application #PDR17-0024ARB17-0065 Resolution #18-009 Page | 8 building setbacks comply with the Approved Plans,” which note shall represent a condition which must be satisfied to remain in compliance with this Design Review Approval. 20 Community Development Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, California 95070 ARBORIST REPORT Application No. ARB17-0065 Prepared by Kate Bear, City Arborist Site: 20381 Zorka Avenue Phone: (408) 868-1276 Owner: Dami and Kirit Patel Email: kbear@saratoga.ca.us APN: 386-52-047 Email:zorgun99@yahoo.com, damypatel@gmail.com Report History: Final report Date: February 2, 2018 PROJECT SCOPE: The applicant has submitted plans to demolish the existing house and build a new two story house with an attached two car garage. No trees are requested for removal to construct the project. STATUS: Approved by City Arborist, with attached conditions. PROJECT DATA IN BRIEF: Tree bond – Required - $430 Tree fencing – Required – See Conditions of Approval and attached map. Tree removals – No trees are requested or approved for removal to construct this project. Replacement trees – Not required ATTACHMENTS: 1 – Findings 2 – Tree Information 3 – Conditions of Approval 4 – Map Showing Tree Protection Attachment 2 21 20381 Zorka Avenue Attachment 1 FINDINGS: Tree Removals No trees are requested or approved for removal to construct the project. New Construction Based on the information provided, and as conditioned, this project complies with the requirements for the setback of new construction from existing trees under Section 15- 50.120 of the City Code. Tree Preservation Plan Section 15-50.140 of the City Code requires a Tree Preservation Plan for this project. To satisfy this requirement the following shall be copied onto a plan sheet and included in the final sets of plans: 1) The Recommendations from the submitted arborist report dated December 20, 2017; AND 2) The Project Data in Brief, the Conditions of Approval, and the map showing tree protection from this report. 22 20381 Zorka Avenue Attachment 2 TREE INFORMATION: Arborist Report reviewed: Preparer: Kevin Kielty, Kielty Arborist Services LLC Date of Report: December 20, 2017 An arborist report was submitted for this project that inventoried 17 trees, 6 of which are protected by Saratoga City Code. Information on the condition of each tree, potential impacts from construction, suitability for preservation, appraised values and tree protection recommendations was provided. A table summarizing information about each tree is below. No trees are requested for removal to construct the project. Table 1: Information on trees from December 20, 2017 arborist report. Tree No. Species Trunk Diameter (inches) Condition Intensity of Construction Impacts Suitability for Preservation Appraised Value Mexican fan palm 1 Washingtonia robusta 20.9 Good Moderate High $750 Modesto ash 2 Fraxinus velutina 31.0 Fair/Poor Low Moderate $970 Privet 5 Ligustrum japonicum 16.3 Fair Moderate Moderate $1,170 Peppermint tree 6 Agonis flexuosa 22.5 Fair Low High $4,310 Coast live oak Not 7 Quercus agrifolia 19 Fair/Poor Low High appraised Camphor Not 8 Cinnamomum camphora 16.4 Fair/Poor Low High appraised 23 20381 Zorka Avenue Attachment 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. It is the responsibility of the owner, architect and contractor to be familiar with the information in this report and implement the required conditions. 2. All recommendations in the arborist report dated December 20, 2017 prepared by Kevin Kielty shall become conditions of approval. 3. The arborist report dated December 20, 2017 shall be copied on to a plan sheet, titled “Tree Preservation” and included in the final job copy set of plans. 4. The Project Data in Brief, the Conditions of Approval, and the map showing tree protection from this report dated February 2, 2018 shall be copied onto a plan sheet and included in the final set of plans. 5. The designated Project Arborist shall be Kevin Kielty, unless otherwise approved by the City Arborist. 6. Tree Protection Security Deposit a. Is required per City Ordinance 15-50.080. b. Shall be $430 for tree(s) 1 and 2. c. Shall be obtained by the owner and filed with the Community Development Department before obtaining Building Division permits. d. May be in the form of cash, check, credit card payment or a bond. e. Shall remain in place for the duration of construction of the project. f. May be released once the project has been completed, inspected and approved by the City Arborist. 7. Tree Protection Fencing: a. Shall be installed as shown on the attached map. b. Shall be shown on the Site Plan. c. Shall be established prior to the arrival of construction equipment or materials on site. d. Shall be comprised of six-foot high chain link fencing mounted on eight-foot tall, 2-inch diameter galvanized posts, driven 24 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet apart. e. Shall be posted with signs saying “TREE PROTECTION FENCE - DO NOT MOVE OR REMOVE WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM CITY ARBORIST, KATE BEAR (408) 868-1276”. f. Call City Arborist, Kate Bear at (408) 868-1276 for an inspection of tree protection fencing once it has been installed. This is required prior to obtaining building division permits. g. Tree protection fencing shall remain undisturbed throughout the construction until final inspection. 8. If contractor feels that work must be done inside the fenced area, call City Arborist to arrange a field meeting before performing work. 24 20381 Zorka Avenue Attachment 3 9. The Project Arborist shall visit the site every two weeks during grading, trenching or digging activities and every six weeks thereafter. Following visits to the site, the owner/contractor shall provide the City with a report from the Project Arborist including photos documenting the progress of the project and noting any tree issues. 10. No protected tree authorized for removal or encroachment pursuant to this project may be removed or encroached upon until the issuance of the applicable permit from the building division for the approved project. 11. Receipt of a Planning or Building permit does not relieve applicant of his responsibilities for protecting trees per City Code Article 15-50 on all construction work. 12. All construction activities shall be conducted outside tree protection fencing. These activities include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: demolition, grading, trenching, equipment cleaning, stockpiling and dumping materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 13. Trenching to install utilities is not permitted inside tree protection fencing. 14. Roots of protected trees measuring two inches in diameter or more shall not be cut without prior approval of the Project Arborist. Roots measuring less than two inches in diameter may be cut using a sharp pruning tool. 15. Any permitted pruning or root pruning of trees on site shall be performed under the supervision of the Project Arborist and according to ISA standards. 16. No trees are requested or approved for removal to construct this project. 17. Trees permitted for removal shall be replaced on or off site according to good forestry practices, and shall provide equivalent value in terms of aesthetic and environmental quality, size, height, location, appearance and other significant beneficial characteristics of the removed trees. The value of the removed trees shall be calculated in accordance with the ISA Guide for Plant Appraisal. 18. Should any tree be damaged beyond repair, new trees shall be required to replace the tree. If there is insufficient room to plant the necessary number of new trees, some of the value for trees may be paid into the City’s Tree Fund. Replacement values for new trees are listed below. 15 gallon = $350 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 48 inch box = $5,000 60 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 19. Following completion of the work around trees, and before a final inspection of the project, the applicant shall provide a letter to the City from the Project Arborist. That letter shall document the work performed around trees, include photos of the work in progress, and provide information on the condition of the trees. 20. At the end of the project, when the contractor wants to remove tree protection fencing and have the tree protection security deposit released by the City, call City Arborist for a final inspection. 25 1 Attachment 4 Legend Tree Protection Fencing 2 3 4 20381 Zorka Avenue 6 5 26 STORY POLE HEIGHT LOCATION CERTIFICATION May 30, 2018 Property Owner/Developer: Zorka Avenue Development Project Address: 20381 Zorka Ave., Saratoga, CA Legal Description: APN: 386-52-047 To whom it may concern: I hereby certify that the Story Poles located on the referenced site were constructed under my supervision and survey, and the Story Poles are in conformance with the design, height and location as shown on the approved staking plan and/or architectural plan. I further certify that 1) The Story Pole identification numbers, 2) Story Pole location base grade elevations, 3) Story Pole heights and 4) the proposed maximum height elevations are true and correct. I acknowledge and understand that the required staking is for the purpose of informing the owner, architect, designer, City/County staff, design review authority, and the public as to the accurate location and exterior dimensions of the proposed structure or addition. TERWILLIGER Land Survey Engineers Ph: 310.666.2510 Attachment 3 27 LOCATION MAPPROJECT TEAMSHEET INDEXCOVER SHEETA0.0NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCEASSESSOR'S PARCEL MAPP A T E L R E S I D E N C ESITESITEDEMOLISH AN EXISTING ONE STORY RESIDENCE ON DEVELOPED SITE. NEWCONSTRUCTION TO BE A TWO STORY RESIDENCE WITH 5 BEDROOMS, 4BATHROOMS AND 1 POWDER ROOM, WITH 2912.3 S.F. LIVING AREA, AND456.8 S.F. GARAGE TOTALING 3369.1 S.F. ON A 10,313.0 S.F. LOT.GENERALA0.0 COVER SHEETAR.1 ARBORIST REPORTAR.2 ARBORIST REPORTA0.2a FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONSA0.2b LOT COVERAGE CALCULATIONSA0.3a EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVESA0.3b EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVESA0.4 STREETSCAPESCIVILC.0 TOPO SURVEYC.1 PRELIMINARY GRADING &DRAINAGE PLANARCHITECTURALA1.0a SITE PLANA1.0b DEMO SITE PLANA2.1 1ST&2ND FLOOR PLANSA2.2 1ST&2ND FLOOR ROOF PLANSA3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA4.0 WINDOW SCHEDULEA5.0 SECTIONSLANDSCAPEL-1 LANDSCAPE CONCEPTAPPLICABLE CODESPROJECT SUMMARYAPPLICABLE CODES (with City of Saratoga Amendments)2016 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, CAC2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, CBC2016 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, CRC2016 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, CMC2016 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, CPC2016 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, CEnC2016 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL CODE, CEC2016 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, CFC2016 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE2016 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS2016 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDSSCOPE OF WORKDEFERRED SUBMITTALS1. FIRE SPRINKLERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 13D AND STATE AND LOCALREQUIREMENTS--NOTE THAT PER CRC 313.3.7, A SIGN OR VALVE TAG SHALL BEINSTALLED AT THE MAIN SHUTOFF VALVE TO THE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMSTATING THE FOLLOWING: "WARNING, THE WATER SYSTEM FOR THIS HOMESUPPLIES FIRE SPRINKLERS THAT REQUIRE CERTAIN FLOWS AND PRESSURES TOFIGHT A FIRE. DEVICES THAT RESTRICT THE FLOW OR DECREASE THE PRESSUREOR AUTOMATICALLY SHUT OFF THE WATER TO THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM,SUCH AS WATER SOFTENERS, FILTRATION SYSTEMS AND AUTOMATIC SHUTOFFVALVES, SHALL NOT BE ADDED TO THIS SYSTEM WITHOUT A REVIEW OF THEFIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM BY A FIRE PROTECTION SPECIALIST. DO NOT REMOVETHIS SIGN"2. STAIR GUARDRAIL SHOP DRAWINGS SIGNED AND STAMPED BY ENGINEER TOBE SUBMITTED TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL--NOTETHAT SHOP DRAWINGS TO DEMONSTRATE GUARDRAIL DESIGN IS ADEQUATETO SUPPORT A SINGLE CONCENTRATED 200 POUND LOAD APPLIED IN ANYDIRECTION AT ANY POINT ALONG THE TOP OF THE RAIL PER CRC TABLE 301.5AND 301.5 FOOTNOTE D20381 ZORKA AVENUE, SARATOGA, CAPROJECT NO. REVISIONCSTUDIO S SQUARED ARCHITECTURE, INC.17-006 DESCRIPTIONDATE 20381 ZORKA AVENUE, SARATOGA, CA DAMYANTI AND KIRIT PATELTRUE"FOR PLANNING APPROVAL ONLY--NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"1000 S Winchester BlvdSan Jose, CA 95128P : (408) 998 - 0983F : (408) 404 - 0144PATEL RESIDENCE NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 11.07.2017.PLANNING PERMIT SUBMITTALN DRAWN BY IV 04.05.2018.PLANNING PERMIT RESUBM. IV O W N E RDamyanti & Kirit Patel20381 Zorka Avenue,Saratoga, CA 95070ph: 408 725 2410email: zorgun99@yahoo.comA R C H I T E C TStudio S Squared Architecture, Inc.1000 S Winchester BlvdSan Jose, CA 95128attn: Eugene H. Sakai, AIA, LEED APph: 408 998 0983 ; 408 404 0144email: ESakai@StudioS2arch.comG E O T E C H N I C A L E N G I N E E RRomig Engineers, Inc.attn: Lucas Ottoboniph: 650 591 5224email:lucas@romigengineers.comC I V I L E N G I N E E RWEC & Associatesattn: Ed Wuemail: ed@weceng.comL A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C TT.H. Norton Landscape Architectureattn: Tom Nortonph: 925 849 6085email: tom@thnorton.comTHE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT FORAPPROVAL/REVIEW:1. WINDOW/DOOR PACKAGE2. CABINET SHOP DRAWINGS AND FINISH SAMPLES3. MECHANICAL DUCTING PLAN4. STAIR AND RAIL SHOP DRAWINGS5. MISC. STEEL SHOP DRAWINGSNOTE: SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIRED SUBMITTALS FOR SHOPDRAWINGS, ETC.REQ'D CONTRACTOR SUBMITTALS TO BUILDINGDEPT. PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE1. LICENSE NUMBER2. INSURANCE AND WORKER'S COMP POLICIES3. CONSTRUCTION STAGING PLAN4. CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITHCALGREEN 4.408.2REQ'D CONTRACTORSUBMITTALS TO ARCHITECTFLOOR AREAExistingProposed Total SFFirst FloorSecond FloorGarageEnclosed Porch (not FAR)Other (<5 ft. high, not FAR)TotalN/A1795.0 SF776.2 SF456.8 SFIMPERVIOUS SURFACESTotal SFFootprint of Home/Garage (including roof overhang)DrivewayWalkways / DecksOther (Pool)(a) SubTotal ImperviousHEIGHTLowest Elevation point at the building edge from natural gradeHighest elevation point at the building edge from natural gradeAverage elevation point(based on highest and lowest points above)Top most elevation point - measured from average point (above) to thetop most point of the roof. Include separate calculation for chimney, etc.SETBACKSFront First FloorLeft Side First FloorLeft Side Second FloorRight Side First FloorRight Side Second FloorRear First FloorRear Second FloorRequiredProposed25'-0"15'-0"28'-9 1/2"25'-3"21'-8"10'-0"10'-0"13'-11"N/A1117.3 SFN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A4268.2 SF776.2 SF4268.2 SF429.7 SF773.7 SF1141.8 SF3565.4 SF5910.7 SFSITE COVERAGEPERVIOUS SURFACESActual S.F.50% creditTotal SFPermeable paver drivewayPermeable paver walkways/patioPermeable artificial turf / Other(b) SubTotal Pervious144.8 SFN/AMAX. SITE COVERAGE ALLOWED 6187.8 SFN/AN/A72.4 SFN/A72.4 SF122.9 SF 122.9 SFN/AN/A15'-0"18'-7"SITE COVERAGE TOTAL (a) + (b)5983.1 SFFront Second Floor25'-0"25'-3"1795.0 SF456.8 SF1117.3 SF144.8 SF 72.4 SF 72.4 SFN/AN/AN/A100.02'100.28'100.15'25.60'28 ARBORISTREPORTAR.1PROJECT NO. REVISIONCSTUDIO S SQUARED ARCHITECTURE, INC.15-005 DESCRIPTIONDATE ADDRESS OWNERSTRUE 1000 S Winchester BlvdSan Jose, CA 95128P : (408) 998 - 0983F : (408) 404 - 0144XXXX RESIDENCE NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE OR REMODEL/ ADDITION 10.16.2015.BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL NDRAWN BY HCARBORIST REPORT-129 ARBORISTREPORTAR.2PROJECT NO. REVISIONCSTUDIO S SQUARED ARCHITECTURE, INC.15-005 DESCRIPTIONDATE ADDRESS OWNERSTRUE 1000 S Winchester BlvdSan Jose, CA 95128P : (408) 998 - 0983F : (408) 404 - 0144XXXX RESIDENCE NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE OR REMODEL/ ADDITION 10.16.2015.BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL NDRAWN BY HCARBORIST REPORT-130 NL# = NEW LIVING AREA FLOOR AREA LEGEND -NG# = NEW GARAGE AREAS# = NEW STORAGE AREA (<5FT. HEIGHT)NP# = NEW PORCH AREAPROJECT NO. REVISIONCSTUDIO S SQUARED ARCHITECTURE, INC.17-006 DESCRIPTIONDATE 20381 ZORKA AVENUE, SARATOGA, CA DAMYANTI AND KIRIT PATELTRUE"FOR PLANNING APPROVAL ONLY--NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"1000 S Winchester BlvdSan Jose, CA 95128P : (408) 998 - 0983F : (408) 404 - 0144PATEL RESIDENCE NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 11.07.2017.PLANNING PERMIT SUBMITTALN DRAWN BY IV 04.05.2018.PLANNING PERMIT RESUBM. IVFLOORAREACALCULATIONSA0.2afeet2 4 8 121feet2 4 8 12131 PROJECT NO. REVISIONCSTUDIO S SQUARED ARCHITECTURE, INC.17-006 DESCRIPTIONDATE 20381 ZORKA AVENUE, SARATOGA, CA DAMYANTI AND KIRIT PATELTRUE"FOR PLANNING APPROVAL ONLY--NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"1000 S Winchester BlvdSan Jose, CA 95128P : (408) 998 - 0983F : (408) 404 - 0144PATEL RESIDENCE NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 11.07.2017.PLANNING PERMIT SUBMITTALN DRAWN BY IV 04.05.2018.PLANNING PERMIT RESUBM. IV LOTCOVERAGECALCULATIONSA0.2bR# = FOOTPRINT OF HOME/GARAGE/POOL SHED (INCLUDINGROOF OVERHANG) FLOOR AREA LEGEND - D# = DRIVEWAY (IMPERVIOUS)W# = WALKWAY/DECKSP# = EXISTING POOL AREAS = FRONT YARD SETBACK AREAfeet2 4 8 1211ST FLOOR AREA CALCS 1/8"2R1D1W1W3W2P1S32 1000 S. Winchester Blvd San Jose, CA 95128 P : (408) 998 - 0983 F : (408) 404 - 0144 PROJECT NO.17-006 REVISION DATE DESCRIPTIONPLANNING PERMIT SUBMITTAL11.07.2017.DRAWN BYSTUDIO S SQUARED ARCHITECTURE, INC.C PATEL RESIDENCENEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE20381 ZORKA AVENUE, SARATOGA, CADAMYANTI AND KIRIT PATEL"FOR PLANNING APPROVAL ONLY--NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"IV04.05.2018.PLANNING PERMIT RESUBM.IVEXTERIOR PERSPECTIVES A0.3a 3-PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR FRONT HIGH6-PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR REAR HIGH 2-PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR FRONT LEFT 1-PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR FRONT RIGHT 5-PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR REAR LEFT 4-PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR REAR RIGHT 33 1000 S. Winchester Blvd San Jose, CA 95128 P : (408) 998 - 0983 F : (408) 404 - 0144 PROJECT NO.17-006 REVISION DATE DESCRIPTIONPLANNING PERMIT SUBMITTAL11.07.2017.DRAWN BYSTUDIO S SQUARED ARCHITECTURE, INC.C PATEL RESIDENCENEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE20381 ZORKA AVENUE, SARATOGA, CADAMYANTI AND KIRIT PATEL"FOR PLANNING APPROVAL ONLY--NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"IV04.05.2018.PLANNING PERMIT RESUBM.IVEXTERIOR PERSPECTIVES A0.3b 3-PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR FRONT LEFT - EXISTING POOL SHED6-PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR RIGHT - GARAGE AND WORKSHOP 2-PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR FRONT LEFT - PATIO SCREENING 1-PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR FRONT ENTRY 5-PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR REAR HIGH - DECK, MASTER BALCONY 4-PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR LEFT - PATIO 34 1000 S. Winchester Blvd San Jose, CA 95128 P : (408) 998 - 0983 F : (408) 404 - 0144 PROJECT NO.17-006 REVISION DATE DESCRIPTIONPLANNING PERMIT SUBMITTAL11.07.2017.DRAWN BYSTUDIO S SQUARED ARCHITECTURE, INC.C PATEL RESIDENCENEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE20381 ZORKA AVENUE, SARATOGA, CADAMYANTI AND KIRIT PATEL"FOR PLANNING APPROVAL ONLY--NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"IV04.05.2018.PLANNING PERMIT RESUBM.IVSTREETSCAPES A0.4 1-STREETSCAPE IMAGES 31/16"STREETSCAPE ELEVATION 2.1-MAP2.2-STREETSCAPE - SETBACKS - PERSCPECTIVE VIEW feet 1 4 8 16 24 +/-116.99' MAX. HEIGHT 20393 ZORKA AVENUE 20381 ZORKA AVENUE SUBJECT PROPOERTY 20351 ZORKA AVENUE PL +/-125.75' MAX. HEIGHT +/-116' MAX. HEIGHT PL PL SUBJECT PROPERTY 20351 20393 20393 ZORKA AVENUE 20381 ZORKA AVENUE SUBJECT PROPOERTY 20351 ZORKA AVENUE 20393 20351 35 36 37 ZORKAAVENUE( 60 ' R /W )SSCOGM EM W/HHEATPUMPHEATPUMP10'-0" REQUIRED 1STFLOOR RIGHT SIDE SETBACK15'-0" REQUIRED 2NDFLOOR RIGHT SIDE SETBACK 10'-0" REQUIRED 1STFLOOR LEFT SIDE SETBACK15'-0" REQUIRED2ND FLOOR LEFT SIDE SETBACK25'-0" REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK25'-3" PROPOSED 1ST&2ND FLOOR FRONT SETBACK 13'-11" PROPOSED1STFLOOR RIGHT SIDE SETBACK18'-7" PROPOSED 2NDFLOOR RIGHT SIDE SETBACK 21'-8" PROPOSED1ST FLOOR LEFT SIDE SETBACK28'-9 1/2" PROPOSED2ND FLOOR LEFT SIDE SETBACK9'-6"18'-0" PROJECT NO. REVISIONCSTUDIO S SQUARED ARCHITECTURE, INC.17-006 DESCRIPTIONDATE 20381 ZORKA AVENUE, SARATOGA, CA DAMYANTI AND KIRIT PATELTRUE"FOR PLANNING APPROVAL ONLY--NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"1000 S Winchester BlvdSan Jose, CA 95128P : (408) 998 - 0983F : (408) 404 - 0144PATEL RESIDENCE NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 11.07.2017.PLANNING PERMIT SUBMITTALN DRAWN BY IV 04.05.2018.PLANNING PERMIT RESUBM.IVSITE PLANA1.0aSITE PLAN1/8"1 = NUMBER TO KEY NOTE BELOW1.EXISTING PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY--ANY CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE CITYRIGHT-OF-WAY MUST HAVE AN APPROVED "PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION INTHE PUBLIC STREET" PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THIS WORK. THEPERFORMANCE OF THIS WORK IS NOT AUTHORIZED BY THE BUILDING PERMITISSUANCE BUT SHOWN ON THE BUILDING PERMIT FOR INFORMATION ONLY2.APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE3.(E) WATER METER--CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE (N) METER WITH LOCALWATER COMPANY IF REQUIRED BY INCREASED FIXTURE LOAD4.(N) GAS METER LOCATION5.(N) ELECTRICAL METER LOCATION--CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITHPG&E FOR UPGRADE (200AMPS) TO (E) ELECTRICAL SERVICE6.(N) 4" SEWER LATERAL--CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD7.UFER GROUND CONNECTION PER CEC 250-528.(E) TREE(S) TO REMAIN--PROTECT AS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION - DONOT LEAVE MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT IN ROOT AREAS FOR EXTENDEDPERIODS OF TIME. SEE ARBORIST REPORT (IF PROVIDED) FOR ADDITIONALINFORMATION9.TREE PROTECTION FENCE ON TREE'S DRIP LINE10.(E) SOFTSCAPE AND VEGETATION TO REMAIN11.(N) SOFTSCAPE--PROVIDE DRIP IRRIGATION12.(E) HARDSCAPE TO BE REMOVED13.(N) HARDSCAPE--SLOPE AWAY FROM HOUSE @ 2% MIN.14.(N) 36" MIN. DEEP LEVEL LANDING PER CRC 311.3 W STEPS (MAX. 7.75" RISER)-PROVIDE EQUAL RISERS IF MORE THAN 1 STEP15.(E) DRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVED16.(N) DRIVEWAY, PAVERS OVER 8" BASE ROCK AND 2" SAND -- VERIFY PAVERDESIGN WITH OWNER--MATCH EXISTING DRIVEWAY POSITION17.(N) FENCE AND GATE -- 6' TALL REDWOOD (AT PROPERTY PERIMETER) ANDSTUCCO WALL WITH PAINT WOOD GATE--VERIFY FINAL DESIGN AND FINISHWITH OWNER18.(N) HEATPUMP UNIT PAD(S)--PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TO THIS LOCATION ASREQUIRED, VERIFY SIZE AND QUANTITY WITH HVAC CONTRACTOR. HEATPUMPUNITS TO COMPLY WITH JURISDICTION'S NOISE ORDINANCE19.(E) CURB CUT PER LOCAL JURISDICTION'S STANDARD DETAIL20.(E) POOL AND POOL-EQUIPMENT TO REMAIN -- PROTECT FROM DIRT ANDDAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION21.(E) POOL EQUIPMENT STORAGE TO REMAIN -- PAINT TO MATCH THE DESIGN22.TRASH LOCATION23.(E) STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED#SITE PLAN KEYNOTES - SITE PLAN LEGEND - NOTES:1.(E) WATER SUPPLY TO BE REPLACED FROM METER IN.2.(E) SEWER LATERAL TO BE REPLACED FROM PROPERTY LINE IN.NEW LIVING AREANEW HARDSCAPE[--SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR MORE INFO]SURFACE RUNOFF FLOW ARROW. SLOPE GRADE AT INDICATEDPERCENT FOR MIN. 10'-0" FROM BUILDING PER CBC 1804.3X%UNCONCENTRATED SHEET FLOW TOWARDS STREET(EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN TO REMAIN)SPOT ELEVATION, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGSFOR MORE INFOXX+/-XX.XX'1TREE NUMBEREXISTING HARDSCAPENOTES:1.SETBACK VERIFICATION NOTE: PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION BY THE CITY, THE LLSOF RECORD SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION THAT ALL BUILDING SETBACKSARE PER THE APPROVED PLANS.2.STORM WATER RETENTION NOTE: DISPOSITION AND TREATMENT OF STORM WATER WILLCOMPLY WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM ("NPDES")STANDARDS AND IMPLEMENTATION STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE SANTA CLARAVALLEY URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAMREQUIRED YARD SETBACK/EASEMENTPROPERTY LINE--SEE TOPO SURVEY FOR MORE INFOTREE PROTECTION FENCINGfeet24812118T.Y.P.10161920202257461717171311141314131413141314921OUTLINE OF 2ND FLOOR(N) +/-101.50'F.F.(N) +/-100.47'F.F.(N) +/-101.17'F.F.(N) +/-101.42'F.F.(N) +/-101.42'F.F.181465X910111213151423789938 ZORKAAVENUE( 60 ' R /W ) 10'-0" REQUIRED 1STFLOOR RIGHT SIDE SETBACK15'-0" REQUIRED 2NDFLOOR RIGHT SIDE SETBACK 10'-0" REQUIRED 1STFLOOR LEFT SIDE SETBACK15'-0" REQUIRED2ND FLOOR LEFT SIDE SETBACK25'-0" REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK PROJECT NO. REVISIONCSTUDIO S SQUARED ARCHITECTURE, INC.17-006 DESCRIPTIONDATE 20381 ZORKA AVENUE, SARATOGA, CA DAMYANTI AND KIRIT PATELTRUE"FOR PLANNING APPROVAL ONLY--NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"1000 S Winchester BlvdSan Jose, CA 95128P : (408) 998 - 0983F : (408) 404 - 0144PATEL RESIDENCE NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 11.07.2017.PLANNING PERMIT SUBMITTALN DRAWN BY IV 04.05.2018.PLANNING PERMIT RESUBM.IVDEMO SITE PLANA1.0bSITE PLAN1/8"1 = NUMBER TO KEY NOTE BELOW1.EXISTING PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY--ANY CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE CITYRIGHT-OF-WAY MUST HAVE AN APPROVED "PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION INTHE PUBLIC STREET" PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THIS WORK. THEPERFORMANCE OF THIS WORK IS NOT AUTHORIZED BY THE BUILDING PERMITISSUANCE BUT SHOWN ON THE BUILDING PERMIT FOR INFORMATION ONLY2.APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE3.(E) WATER METER--CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE (N) METER WITH LOCALWATER COMPANY IF REQUIRED BY INCREASED FIXTURE LOAD4.(N) GAS METER LOCATION5.(N) ELECTRICAL METER LOCATION--CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITHPG&E FOR UPGRADE (200AMPS) TO (E) ELECTRICAL SERVICE6.(N) 4" SEWER LATERAL--CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD7.UFER GROUND CONNECTION PER CEC 250-528.(E) TREE(S) TO REMAIN--PROTECT AS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION - DONOT LEAVE MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT IN ROOT AREAS FOR EXTENDEDPERIODS OF TIME. SEE ARBORIST REPORT (IF PROVIDED) FOR ADDITIONALINFORMATION9.TREE PROTECTION FENCE ON TREE'S DRIP LINE10.(E) SOFTSCAPE AND VEGETATION TO REMAIN11.(N) SOFTSCAPE--PROVIDE DRIP IRRIGATION12.(E) HARDSCAPE TO BE REMOVED13.(N) HARDSCAPE--SLOPE AWAY FROM HOUSE @ 2% MIN.14.(N) 36" MIN. DEEP LEVEL LANDING PER CRC 311.3 W STEPS (MAX. 7.75" RISER)-PROVIDE EQUAL RISERS IF MORE THAN 1 STEP15.(E) DRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVED16.(N) DRIVEWAY, PAVERS OVER 8" BASE ROCK AND 2" SAND -- VERIFY PAVERDESIGN WITH OWNER--MATCH EXISTING DRIVEWAY POSITION17.(N) FENCE AND GATE -- 6' TALL REDWOOD (AT PROPERTY PERIMETER) ANDSTUCCO WALL WITH PAINT WOOD GATE--VERIFY FINAL DESIGN AND FINISHWITH OWNER18.(N) HEATPUMP UNIT PAD(S)--PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TO THIS LOCATION ASREQUIRED, VERIFY SIZE AND QUANTITY WITH HVAC CONTRACTOR. HEATPUMPUNITS TO COMPLY WITH JURISDICTION'S NOISE ORDINANCE19.(E) CURB CUT PER LOCAL JURISDICTION'S STANDARD DETAIL20.(E) POOL AND POOL-EQUIPMENT TO REMAIN -- PROTECT FROM DIRT ANDDAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION21.(E) POOL EQUIPMENT STORAGE TO REMAIN -- PAINT TO MATCH THE DESIGN22.TRASH LOCATION23.(E) STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED#SITE PLAN KEYNOTES - SITE PLAN LEGEND - NOTES:1.(E) WATER SUPPLY TO BE REPLACED FROM METER IN.2.(E) SEWER LATERAL TO BE REPLACED FROM PROPERTY LINE IN.NEW LIVING AREANEW HARDSCAPE[--SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR MORE INFO]SURFACE RUNOFF FLOW ARROW. SLOPE GRADE AT INDICATEDPERCENT FOR MIN. 10'-0" FROM BUILDING PER CBC 1804.3X%UNCONCENTRATED SHEET FLOW TOWARDS STREET(EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN TO REMAIN)SPOT ELEVATION, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGSFOR MORE INFOXX+/-XX.XX'1TREE NUMBEREXISTING HARDSCAPENOTES:1.SETBACK VERIFICATION NOTE: PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION BY THE CITY, THE LLSOF RECORD SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION THAT ALL BUILDING SETBACKSARE PER THE APPROVED PLANS.2.STORM WATER RETENTION NOTE: DISPOSITION AND TREATMENT OF STORM WATER WILLCOMPLY WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM ("NPDES")STANDARDS AND IMPLEMENTATION STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE SANTA CLARAVALLEY URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAMREQUIRED YARD SETBACK/EASEMENTPROPERTY LINE--SEE TOPO SURVEY FOR MORE INFOTREE PROTECTION FENCINGfeet248121122238T.Y.P.9151920201223231465X91011121514237839 48refdw wddwlivingdiningfoyerporchkitchennookpantrygaragelaundrybr4/multibr5 (den)powderupovenstallfamilyexisting poolopen to abovecoats80" TVdeskpull out shelving deskdeskdatatallwet barrefref10' ceilingba4covered patio12' ceilingtallsinktalltallcoveredworkshopGM EMCRAWL W/HHEATPUMPHEATPUMPABCEDFGABCEDFGHH765423176542312A3.12A3.01A3.11A3.02A5.02A5.01A5.01A5.028'-10 1/2"10'-5 1/2"5'-9 1/2"8'-2"7'-9 1/2"18'-11"19'-7 1/2"21'-10"20'-2"14'-2"5'-5"6'-11 1/2"13'-2 1/2"11'-3"21'-11 1/2"13'-4 1/2"20'-2 1/2"4'-8"1'-4" 4'-4"3'-8"3'-7"1'-3 1/2"9'-1"5'-6"12'-8"10'-0"19'-11"13'-8 1/2"5'-5"20'-2"5'-6 1/2"4'-0"4'-0"4'-0"17'-0"2'-5 1/2"3'-8"6'-0" 10'-1 1/2" 12'-10"8'-11 1/2" 2'-1 1/2"17'-0 1/2"5'-0"7'-1"3'-5"5'-6 1/2" Cal Kingmaster brbr2br3ba2ba3open to belowdnmbamcloslinen storagelinenABCEDFGABCEDFGHH765423176542312A3.12A3.01A3.11A3.02A5.02A5.01A5.01A5.013'-6 1/2"12'-0"5'-8 1/2"5'-3"5'-0 1/2"7'-2"6'-0 1/2"10'-11 1/2" 11'-1"4'-9 1/2"7'-3 1/2"11'-5"6'-9 1/2"5'-10 1/2"11'-7 1/2"6'-0 1/2"3'-5 1/2"7'-11 1/2"5'-9"11'-7"5'-8 1/2"17'-5 1/2"4'-4"1'-4 1/2" 2'-1" 5'-1 1/2"3'-1"PROJECT NO. REVISIONCSTUDIO S SQUARED ARCHITECTURE, INC.17-006 DESCRIPTIONDATE 20381 ZORKA AVENUE, SARATOGA, CA DAMYANTI AND KIRIT PATELTRUE"FOR PLANNING APPROVAL ONLY--NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"1000 S Winchester BlvdSan Jose, CA 95128P : (408) 998 - 0983F : (408) 404 - 0144PATEL RESIDENCE NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 11.07.2017.PLANNING PERMIT SUBMITTALN DRAWN BY IV 04.05.2018.PLANNING PERMIT RESUBM.IV1ST&2NDFLOOR PLANSA2.12ND FLOOR PLAN 1/8"2 = NUMBER TO KEY NOTE BELOW1.(N) CONCRETE STEP(S)--10" MIN. TREAD AND MAX. 7" RISER HEIGHT2.INDICATES ROD AND SHELF AT ±6'-0" A.F.F.--VERIFY HEIGHT WITH OWNER3.(N) PREMANUFACTURED DIRECT-VENT SEALED-COMBUSTION GAS FIREPLACE,TO BE LISTED AND LABELED, TESTED BY AN APPROVED TESTING LABORATORY,AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LISTING AND MANUF. INSTALLATIONINSTRUCTIONS. FIREPLACE SHALL HAVE CLOSABLE METAL OR GLASSCOVERING THE ENTIRE OPENING OF THE FIREBOX. FACTORY-BUILTFIREPLACES SHALL BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UL-127. FIREPLACE TOCOMPLY WITH EPA PHASE II EMISSION LIMITS--VERIFY FINAL SELECTION WITHOWNER PRIOR TO PLACING ORDER4.(N) 18" X 24" MIN. CRAWLSPACE ACCESS5.(N) WATER HEATER IN GARAGE ON 18" HIGH PLATFORM WITH 4" CONCRETEFILLED STEEL BOLLARD IN FRONT. WATER HEATER TO BE STRAPPED PERPLUMBING GENERAL NOTES ON A0.1a. PROVIDE FOR MAKEUP AIR PERCMC--SEE TITLE 24 REPORT FOR APPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS6.(N) FURNACE IN GARAGE ON 18" HIGH PLATFORM WITH 4" CONCRETE FILLEDSTEEL BOLLARD IN FRONT--PROVIDE 30" WIDE, HIGH, AND DEEP CLEARWORKING SPACE PER CMC 305.0. PROVIDE FOR MAKEUP AIR PER CMC --SEETITLE 24 REPORT FOR APPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS7.CUSTOM CABINETRY8.FULL HEIGHT LINEN CABINET WITH SHELVES, KRAFTMAID OR EQUAL9.INSTALL MIN. 1/2" GYP.BD. ON WALLS, UNDER-STAIR SURFACE, AND ANYSOFFITS AT ENCLOSED ACCESSIBLE SPACE UNDER STAIRS PER CRC 302.7#(N) WALL: EXTERIOR: 2x6 STUDS @16" O.C.; INTERIOR 2x4 STUDS@16"O.C--SEE ELEVATIONS AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOREXTERIOR WALL MATERIAL ASSEMBLIES. INSTALL 1 LAYER (MIN.)OF WEATHER RESISTIVE BARRIER (TYVEK HOUSE WRAP OR EQ.)OVER EXTERIOR WALLS SHEATHING PER CRC 703.2--INSTALL PERMANUF. INSTRUCTIONS. PROVIDE 5/8" TYPE 'X' GYPSUM BOARDEACH SIDE @ INTERIOR PARTITIONS. PROVIDE CEMENT BOARDOR TILE BACKER BOARD AT SHOWER/TUB LOCATIONS. ALLWALLS TO RECEIVE (N) PAINT FINISH. ALL CEILINGS ATTUB/SHOWERS TO BE M.R. BOARDFLOOR PLAN LEGEND-#WINDOW KEY-- SEE A4.0 FOR MORE INFORMATIONDENOTES (N) HOSE BIBB. SEE PLANS FOR NEW LOCATION -INSTALL HOSE BIBBS PER CPC WITH APPROVED ANTI-SIPHONDEVICE. (E) HOSE BIBBS TO REMAIN.NOTE:1.SEE 2/A0.1a FOR PLUMBING GENERAL NOTES2.SEE 3/A0.1a FOR MECHANICAL GENERAL NOTES3.SEE 4/A0.1a FOR ELECTRICAL GENERAL NOTES4.SEE 5/A0.1a FOR PLAN AND INTERIOR GENERAL NOTESFLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES-(N) GAS COCK--REFER TO MANUF. SPECS FOR ELECTRICAL ANDGAS REQUIREMENTS. PLUMBER TO VERIFY GAS PIPE DIAMETERNEEDED FOR APPLIANCE FROM GAS METER LOCATION(N)/EXISTING WALL W/ 1 HOUR SEPARATION--5/8" TYPE 'X' GYPON GARAGE SIDE FROM FOUNDATION TO ROOF SHEATHINGfeet2481211ST FLOOR PLAN 1/8"1feet248121234156789101211131415161718192040 ABCEDFGABCEDFGHH765423176542312A3.12A3.01A3.11A3.02A5.02A5.01A5.01A5.0ABCEDFGABCEDFGHH765423176542312A3.12A3.01A3.11A3.02A5.02A5.01A5.01A5.0PROJECT NO. REVISIONCSTUDIO S SQUARED ARCHITECTURE, INC.17-006 DESCRIPTIONDATE 20381 ZORKA AVENUE, SARATOGA, CA DAMYANTI AND KIRIT PATELTRUE"FOR PLANNING APPROVAL ONLY--NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"1000 S Winchester BlvdSan Jose, CA 95128P : (408) 998 - 0983F : (408) 404 - 0144PATEL RESIDENCE NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 11.07.2017.PLANNING PERMIT SUBMITTALN DRAWN BY IV 04.05.2018.PLANNING PERMIT RESUBM. IV1ST&2ND FLOORROOF PLANSA2.22ND FLOOR ROOF PLAN 1/8"2ATTIC VENTILATION CALCULATIONS AND NOTES-DENOTES GUTTER DRAIN (3" DIA.) AND DOWNSPOUT (2" X 3") 26 GAALUMINUM - FIELD VERIFY COLOR W/ OWNER. INSTALL PER MFR.INSTRUCTIONSROOF PLAN LEGENDDSDENOTES DIRECTION OF SLOPE--ROOF SLOPE APPROX., REFER TOELEVATIONS FOR MAX HT AND VERTICAL CONTROLLINE OF BLDG. BELOW= NUMBER TO KEY NOTE BELOW1. (N) ROOFING--SEE LEGEND BELOW FOR MATERIALS--CONFIRM COLORSELECTION W/ OWNER PRIOR TO PLACING ORDER2. PAINT ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS TO MATCH ROOFING COLOR.3. PROVIDE (N) GSM ROOF JACKS, TYP. CAULK ALL EXPOSED NAIL HEADS WITHSILICONE SEALANT.4. PROVIDE (N) GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS AT LOCATIONS SHOWN5. ALL (N) PLATE HEIGHTS PER SECTIONS AND RCP. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGSFOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.6. CONNECT ALL (N) DOWNSPOUTS TO FLEXIBLE PLASTIC DRAINPIPE AND RUN TOA LOCATION SPECIFIED BY CIVIL PLANSROOF GENERAL NOTES-NOTE:1. SEE 2/A0.1a FOR PLUMBING GENERAL NOTES2. SEE 3/A0.1a FOR MECHANICAL GENERAL NOTES3. SEE 4/A0.1a FOR ELECTRICAL GENERAL NOTES4. SEE 5/A0.1a FOR PLAN AND INTERIOR GENERAL NOTESSINGLE PLY ROOFING, MIN CLASS "C"--MANUF: GAF OR EQUAL; STYLE:FULLY ADHERED EVERGUARD EXTREME TPO ROOFING MEMBRANE;THICKNESS: 60 MILLIMETER MIN.--INSTALL O/ 1/2" HIGH DENSITY POLYISOBOARD O/ SLOPING PLYWOOD SHEATHING TO ENSURE MIN. 3/8:12SLOPE. INSTALL 3/8" ROOFING GRAVEL o/ 6-OZ MIN. POLYMAT o/ROOFING MEMBRANE AT LOW ROOFS THAT ARE VISIBLE FROM 2NDFLOOR WINDOWS--INSTALL PER MANUF. 20-YEAR WARRANTYINSTRUCTIONS.DENOTES FLAT ROOF DRAIN CONNECTED TO HARDPIPED 2" RAINWATER LEADER AND 2" ROOF OVERFLOW. OVERFLOW TO BECONNECTED TO ESCUTCHEON--SEE DETAILS [XXX/XXXX]--ENSUREROOFING OVERLAPS ROOF DRAIN PER BOTH DRAIN AND ROOFMANUF. DIRECTIONSPOLISHED CONCRETE o/ THIN SET o/ MER-KRETE BFP 3-PARTWATERPROOF AND CRACK ISOLATION MEMBRANE o/ MORTAR BEDSLOPED MIN. 3/8:12--INSTALL PER MANUF. WARRANTY INSTRUCTIONSAND ICC-ES EVALUATION REPORT#ESR-2619--www.merkrete.com--VERIFY TILE SELECTION WITH OWNER,SEAL GROUT BETWEEN TILES#1ST FLOOR ROOF PLAN 1/8"1feet2 4 8 121feet2 4 8 121SCUPPER41 TYPE "A"TYPE "C"TYPE "B"TYPE "D"F.F.TYPE "E"9'-6"4'-6"3'-0"3"7'-0"10'-3"3"2'-0"9'-6"4'-6"6'-0"3"3'-3"9'-6"3"2'-0"2'-0"3"2'-3"4'-6"9'-6" 4'-6"5'-0"3"2'-9"8'-0"3"2'-0" 9'-6" 4'-6"5'-9"3"3'-0"9'-0"3"2'-0" 9'-0" 4'-6"2'-9"3"5'-0"8'-0"3"2'-0" 8'-0" 5'-0"5'-0"3'-0"8'-0"2'-0"3'-0"5'-0"TYPE "F"TYPE "G"9'-0" 4'-3"5'-9"3"3'-0"9'-0"3"2'-0" PROJECT NO. REVISIONCSTUDIO S SQUARED ARCHITECTURE, INC.17-006 DESCRIPTIONDATE 20381 ZORKA AVENUE, SARATOGA, CA DAMYANTI AND KIRIT PATELTRUE"FOR PLANNING APPROVAL ONLY--NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"1000 S Winchester BlvdSan Jose, CA 95128P : (408) 998 - 0983F : (408) 404 - 0144PATEL RESIDENCE NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 11.07.2017.PLANNING PERMIT SUBMITTALN DRAWN BY IV 04.05.2018.PLANNING PERMIT RESUBM.IVWINDOWSCHEDULEA4.0WINDOW SCHEDULE-142 1000 S. Winchester Blvd San Jose, CA 95128 P : (408) 998 - 0983 F : (408) 404 - 0144 PROJECT NO.17-006 REVISION DATE DESCRIPTIONPLANNING PERMIT SUBMITTAL11.07.2017.DRAWN BYSTUDIO S SQUARED ARCHITECTURE, INC.C PATEL RESIDENCENEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE20381 ZORKA AVENUE, SARATOGA, CADAMYANTI AND KIRIT PATEL"FOR PLANNING APPROVAL ONLY--NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"IV04.05.2018.PLANNING PERMIT RESUBM.IVEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.0 21/8"WEST-NORTH ELEVATION (LEFT) 11/8"SOUTH-WEST ELEVATION (FRONT) = NUMBER OF KEYNOTE BELOW# --ELEVATION GRID LINE KEY NOTES: 1.SEE 2/A0.1a FOR PLUMBING GENERAL NOTES 2.SEE 3/A0.1a FOR MECHANICAL GENERAL NOTES 3.SEE 3/A0.1a FOR ELECTRICAL GENERAL NOTES 4.SEE 4/A0.1a FOR PLAN AND INTERIOR GENERAL NOTES 5.EXTERIOR HARDSCAPE AND EXTERIOR STAIRS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY--SEE A0.3a FOR 3D MODEL VIEWS --KEYNOTESfeet 1 2 43 6 feet 1 2 43 6 -1/20ROOF PLAN PAINT SCHEDULE: P1 - BENJAMIN MOORE - SIMPLE WHITE OC-117 P2 - KENDALL CHARCOAL HC-166 ELEVATION GRID LINE KEY A 1ST FLOOR FINISH FLOOR = +/- 101.50' B 1ST FLOOR CEILING HEIGHT (U.N.O.) = +/- 111.50' C 2ND FLOOR FINISH FLOOR (U.N.O.) = +/- 112.75' D 2ND FLOOR CEILING HEIGHT (U.N.O.) = +/- 121.75' E PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT = +/- 125.75' F MAX BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED = 26'-0"; +/- 126.16' 1 THREE PARALLEL LINES: 1)AVERAGE GRADE; 2)18" ABOVE AVERAGE GRADE AND 3)26' ABOVE AVERAGE GRADE 2 FLAT ROOF--SEE ROOF PLANS FOR MORE INFO 3 METAL ROOF OVERHANG--SEE ROOF PLAN FOR MORE INFO 4 PAINTED STEEL TROWELED IGNITION RESISTANT CEMENT PLASTER SYSTEM (SMOOTH FINISH) - 7/8" CEMENT PLASTER O/ METAL LATH O/ 2 LAYERS GRADE 'D' OR BETTER BUILDING PAPER, 3 COAT SYSTEM WITH 26 ga. WEEP SCREED AT WALL BASE AT LEAST 4" ABOVE GRADE OR 2" ABOVE HARDSCAPE-- SEE MATERIAL BOARD FOR MORE INFO, SEE PAINT SCHEDULE BELOW 5 STAIN GRADE CEDAR SIDING o/ 1 LAYER TYVEK HOUSE WRAP--SIDING PROFILE: V-GROOVE T&G; CEDAR GRADE: CLEAR HEART PER WESTERN RED CEDAR LUMBER ASSOCIATION STANDARDS 6 ALUMINUM PANEL [MATCH FRONT DOOR] AND HANGING BENCH 7 LOW STUCCO WALL WITH 2" METAL WALL CAP TO MATCH DOORS AND WINDOWS 8 PATIO AND WORKSHOP SCREENING - WOOD POSTS - PAINT TO MATCH CEDER SIDING 9 FACTORY-FINISHED ALUMINUM GARAGE DOOR WITH TEMPERED GLAZING PICTURE WINDOWS--SEE DOOR SCHEDULE FOR MORE INFO 10 WINDOW/DOOR OPENING--SEE WINDOW AND DOOR SCHEDULES FOR MORE INFO--DOORS AND WINDOWS TO HAVE 1" ALUMINUM TRIM TYPICAL, U.N.O. 11 ALUMINUM BRAKE SHAPE--FINISH TO MATCH WINDOW FRAME--VERIFY SIZE IN FIELD 12 FIELD PAINTED STEEL COLUMN--S.S.D. FOR MORE INFO 13 EXTERIOR LIGHT, INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS--MANUF.: HINKLEY; STYLE: ATLANTIS 1640SK; COLOR: SATIN BLACK--www.hinkleylighting.com 14 PIN MOUNTED LED ILLUMINATED ADDRESS SIGNAGE, CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM ADJACENT STREET-- HEIGHT: 8"; STYLE: LUXELLO LED, MODERN NEUTRA HOUSE NUMBERS LED BACKLIT; FINISH: ANODIZED-- www.surrounding.com/products/luxello--PROVIDE PHOTOSENSOR CONNECTED LED BACKLIGHTING @ EACH NUMBER 15 EXISTING POOL EQUIPMENT STORAGE -- PAINT TO MATCH THE DESIGN 16 STORAGE AREA, <5 FEET HIGH 17 SCUPPER--SEE ROOF PLAN FOR MORE INFO 18 HEATPUMP ON CONCRETE PLATFORM A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E 1 TYP.2 TYP.3 1645TYP.6 78 89141011TYP.TYP. 17121315 8 P2 4 TYP. P1 1/A3.0 1/A3.1 2/A3.0 2/A3.1 +/-125.75' MAX. HEIGHT +/-101.50' F.F. HEIGHT +/-100.02' +/-124.25' MAX. HEIGHT +/-115.25' MAX. HEIGHT +/-119.75' MAX. HEIGHT +/-125.75' MAX. HEIGHT+/-124.25' MAX. HEIGHT +/-115.25' MAX. HEIGHT 43 1000 S. Winchester Blvd San Jose, CA 95128 P : (408) 998 - 0983 F : (408) 404 - 0144 PROJECT NO.17-006 REVISION DATE DESCRIPTIONPLANNING PERMIT SUBMITTAL11.07.2017.DRAWN BYSTUDIO S SQUARED ARCHITECTURE, INC.C PATEL RESIDENCENEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE20381 ZORKA AVENUE, SARATOGA, CADAMYANTI AND KIRIT PATEL"FOR PLANNING APPROVAL ONLY--NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"IV04.05.2018.PLANNING PERMIT RESUBM.IVEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.1 21/8"EAST-SOUTH ELEVATION (RIGHT) 11/8"NORTH-EAST ELEVATION (REAR) = NUMBER OF KEYNOTE BELOW# feet 1 2 43 6 feet 1 2 43 6 --ELEVATION GRID LINE KEY NOTES: 1.SEE 2/A0.1a FOR PLUMBING GENERAL NOTES 2.SEE 3/A0.1a FOR MECHANICAL GENERAL NOTES 3.SEE 3/A0.1a FOR ELECTRICAL GENERAL NOTES 4.SEE 4/A0.1a FOR PLAN AND INTERIOR GENERAL NOTES 5.EXTERIOR HARDSCAPE AND EXTERIOR STAIRS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY--SEE A0.3a FOR 3D MODEL VIEWS ELEVATION GRID LINE KEY A 1ST FLOOR FINISH FLOOR = +/- 101.50' B 1ST FLOOR CEILING HEIGHT (U.N.O.) = +/- 111.50' C 2ND FLOOR FINISH FLOOR (U.N.O.) = +/- 112.75' D 2ND FLOOR CEILING HEIGHT (U.N.O.) = +/- 121.75' E PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT = +/- 125.75' F MAX BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED = 26'-0"; +/- 126.16' --KEYNOTES PAINT SCHEDULE: P1 - BENJAMIN MOORE - SIMPLE WHITE OC-117 P2 - KENDALL CHARCOAL HC-166 -1/20ROOF PLAN 1 THREE PARALLEL LINES: 1)AVERAGE GRADE; 2)18" ABOVE AVERAGE GRADE AND 3)26' ABOVE AVERAGE GRADE 2 FLAT ROOF--SEE ROOF PLANS FOR MORE INFO 3 METAL ROOF OVERHANG--SEE ROOF PLAN FOR MORE INFO 4 PAINTED STEEL TROWELED IGNITION RESISTANT CEMENT PLASTER SYSTEM (SMOOTH FINISH) - 7/8" CEMENT PLASTER O/ METAL LATH O/ 2 LAYERS GRADE 'D' OR BETTER BUILDING PAPER, 3 COAT SYSTEM WITH 26 ga. WEEP SCREED AT WALL BASE AT LEAST 4" ABOVE GRADE OR 2" ABOVE HARDSCAPE-- SEE MATERIAL BOARD FOR MORE INFO, SEE PAINT SCHEDULE BELOW 5 STAIN GRADE CEDAR SIDING o/ 1 LAYER TYVEK HOUSE WRAP--SIDING PROFILE: V-GROOVE T&G; CEDAR GRADE: CLEAR HEART PER WESTERN RED CEDAR LUMBER ASSOCIATION STANDARDS 6 ALUMINUM PANEL [MATCH FRONT DOOR] AND HANGING BENCH 7 LOW STUCCO WALL WITH 2" METAL WALL CAP TO MATCH DOORS AND WINDOWS 8 PATIO AND WORKSHOP SCREENING - WOOD POSTS - PAINT TO MATCH CEDER SIDING 9 FACTORY-FINISHED ALUMINUM GARAGE DOOR WITH TEMPERED GLAZING PICTURE WINDOWS--SEE DOOR SCHEDULE FOR MORE INFO 10 WINDOW/DOOR OPENING--SEE WINDOW AND DOOR SCHEDULES FOR MORE INFO--DOORS AND WINDOWS TO HAVE 1" ALUMINUM TRIM TYPICAL, U.N.O. 11 ALUMINUM BRAKE SHAPE--FINISH TO MATCH WINDOW FRAME--VERIFY SIZE IN FIELD 12 FIELD PAINTED STEEL COLUMN--S.S.D. FOR MORE INFO 13 EXTERIOR LIGHT, INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS--MANUF.: HINKLEY; STYLE: ATLANTIS 1640SK; COLOR: SATIN BLACK--www.hinkleylighting.com 14 PIN MOUNTED LED ILLUMINATED ADDRESS SIGNAGE, CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM ADJACENT STREET-- HEIGHT: 8"; STYLE: LUXELLO LED, MODERN NEUTRA HOUSE NUMBERS LED BACKLIT; FINISH: ANODIZED-- www.surrounding.com/products/luxello--PROVIDE PHOTOSENSOR CONNECTED LED BACKLIGHTING @ EACH NUMBER 15 EXISTING POOL EQUIPMENT STORAGE -- PAINT TO MATCH THE DESIGN 16 STORAGE AREA, <5 FEET HIGH 17 SCUPPER--SEE ROOF PLAN FOR MORE INFO 18 HEATPUMP ON CONCRETE PLATFORM A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E 12 TYP. 1716 3 TYP.15 8 1/A3.0 1/A3.1 2/A3.0 2/A3.1 +/-100.28' 18 TYP. 18 +/-124.25' MAX. HEIGHT +/-124.25' MAX. HEIGHT +/-115.25' MAX. HEIGHT +/-119.75' MAX. HEIGHT +/-115.25' MAX. HEIGHT +/-119.75' MAX. HEIGHT +/-125.75' MAX. HEIGHT 44 1000 S. Winchester Blvd San Jose, CA 95128 P : (408) 998 - 0983 F : (408) 404 - 0144 PROJECT NO.17-006 REVISION DATE DESCRIPTIONPLANNING PERMIT SUBMITTAL11.07.2017.DRAWN BYSTUDIO S SQUARED ARCHITECTURE, INC.C PATEL RESIDENCENEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE20381 ZORKA AVENUE, SARATOGA, CADAMYANTI AND KIRIT PATEL"FOR PLANNING APPROVAL ONLY--NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"IV04.05.2018.PLANNING PERMIT RESUBM.IVSECTIONS A5.0 SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR ELEVATION GRID LINE KEY --ELEVATION GRID LINE KEY --KEYNOTES -1/20ROOF PLAN21/8"SECTION 2 11/8"SECTION 1 = NUMBER OF KEYNOTE BELOW# feet 1 2 43 6 feet 1 2 43 6 GARAGEBEDROOM 4DATA BATH 3 FOYER CRAWLSPACE BEDROOM 2 LIVING BATH 2 18" MINCLEARFOYERFRONT PORCH FAMILY ROOM CRAWLSPACE REAR PATIO A B C D E A B C D E10'-0"1'-3"9'-0"+/-24'-3"A B C D E A B C D E 18" MINCLEARCOVERED WORKSHOP COVERED PATIO CLOSET STORAGE 2/A5.0 1/A5.026'-0"18'-0"45 32" ASH20" PALM6" PALM7" CHERRY 22" CAL. PEPPER 7" FLOWERINGPLUM4" CITRUS3" CITRUS5" CITRUS3" CITRUS5" CRAP MYRTLE 7" PITTOSPORUM 10" OAK16" TREESARATOGA, CAPATEL RESIDENCELANDSCAPE CONCEPT20381 ZORKA AVE. 1/8" = 1'-0'SUITE 216PLEASANT HILL CA 94523phone: 925 822 3085www.thnorton.coml a n d s c a p e a r c h i t e c t u r e, inc.1630 CONTRA COSTA BLVD.LOT COVERAGE CALCULATIONS:PLOTS: 09/12/17, 09/18/17, 09/22/17, 10/04/17, 10/17/17, 11/01/17L-1EXISTINGPOOLSPAZORKA AVENUE EXISTING PLUM TOBE PROTECTEDEXISTING POOLEQUIPMENT - ENCLOSUREPER ARCHITECTEXISTING TREE TOBE PROTECTED,TYPICAL(4) EXISTING CITRUSTREES TO BE PROTECTEDCONCRETE PATIO -COLOR AND FINISHT.B.D.COVERED PATIOPER ARCHITECT6' PERIMETERFENCE - REDWOODEXISTING CALIFORNIAPEPPER TREE TO BEPROTECTEDEXISTING TREE TOBE PROTECTED(2) PALM TREES TOBE PROTECTEDBASKETBALL HOOPEXISTING VEGETATIONTO REMAINPRELIMINARYNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONEXISTING CITRUSTREE TO BEPROTECTEDCOVERED PATIO,PER ARCHITECTPLANTER AREAEXISTING CRAPE MYRTLETO BE PROTECTEDOVERHANG, PERARCHITECTSELF-CLOSING ANDSELF-LATCHING GATES,TO MEET STATE ANDLOCAL POOL CODESSELF-CLOSING ANDSELF-LATCHING GATES, TO MEETSTATE AND LOCAL POOL CODESCONCRETE DRIVEWAY -COLOR AND FINISH T.B.D.EXISTING VEGETATIONTO REMAINEXISTING VEGETATIONTO REMAINCONCRETE WALKWAYPOOL ALARMS, BY OTHERSHEIGHT PER PLAN3"3"MAX.1"SECTIONFENCE ELEVATION1x4 RAILS ON INSIDE OF FENCECONCRETE FOOTING - CROWN TO DRAINCOMPACTED SUB-GRADE, PER SOILS REPORT4x4 BOTTOM RAIL - RABBET TRIM WITH 1x2 4x4 PT REDWOOD POST @ 8' O.C. MAX.2x4 RAILS ON OUTSIDE OF FENCE AND1x6 REDWOOD BOARDS2x6 REDWOOD CAPGATE ELEVATION1LEGEND1324126732345678GRAVEL SUMP - 6" MIN. DEPTH HEAVY-DUTY, SELF-CLOSING GALVANIZED 9STRAP HINGES3'3"MAX.109VARIESBUILDING EDGE2x4 CROSS BRACE ON INSIDE1111NOTES:·FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PROVIDE POSITIVEDRAINAGE AWAY FROM BOTH SIDES. VERIFY WITHGRADING PLAN.·WATERPROOF STAIN ALL WOOD. SURFACES STAINTO BE BEHR 909. APPLY PER MANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATIONS. VERIFY WITH OWNER.PROP. LINESTREET SIDE2'FINISH GRADE12FINISH TRIM INSIDE FENCE 810LOCKABLE BOLT-ON LATCHPERIMETER FENCING WATER BUDGET CALCULATIONS NOTES:·THE LANDSCAPE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE WATER EFFICIENTLANDSCAPE ORDINANCE (WELO)·A WEATHER BASED AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION CONTROLLER SHALL BE UTILIZED.·PROVIDE 3" OF COMPOSTED, NON-FLOATABLE MULCH IN AREAS BETWEENPLANTINGSBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESCREEN HEDGEPRUNUS CAR. 'BRIGHT N TIGHT' CAROLINA CHERRYPODOCARPUS GRACILIOR FERN PINEVINESBOUGAINVILLEA 'SAN DIEGO RED' RED BOUGAINVILLEATRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES STAR JASMINESHRUBSACACIA C. 'COUSIN ITT' LITTLE RIVER WATTLEANIGOZANTHOS SPECIES KANGAROO PAWCAREX TUMULICOLA BERKELEY SEDGECHONDROPETALUM TECTORUMSMALL CAPE RUSHCYCAS REVOLUTA SAGO PALMFEIJOA SELLOWIANA PINEAPPLE GUAVALOMANDRA L. 'BREEZE' DWARF MAT RUSHLOROPETALUM CHINENSE 'PLUM DELIGHT' CHINESE FRINGE FLOWERMISCANTHUS S. 'MORNING LIGHT' MAIDEN HAIR GRASSPENNISETUM SETACEUM 'RUBRUM' PURPLE FOUNTAIN GRASSPHORMIUM FLAXTULBHAGHIA VIOLACEA SOCIETY GARLICWESTRINGIA F. 'MORNING LIGHT' MORNING LIGHT COAST ROSEMARYGROUNDCOVERSCALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 'LITTLE JOHN' DWARF BOTTLEBRUSHCOLEONEMA PULCHRUM 'SUNSET GOLD' GOLD BREATH OF HEAVENCOPROSMA PETRIEI 'VERDE VISTA' CREEPING COPROSMALANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS 'WHITE' WHITE TRAILING LANTANAWESTRINGIA F. 'MUNDI' LOW COAST ROSEMARYPRELIMINARY PLANT LIST ·NET LOT AREA - 10,313 SF·ARCHITECTURAL COVERAGE - 3512 SF·LANDSCAPE COVERAGE - 2406 SF·NET COVERAGE - 5918 SF·SITE COVERAGE: 57.4%NOTE: MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SITE COVERAGE IS 60%.·REQUIRED FRONT YARD AREA - 4120 SF·NET FRONT YARD COVERAGE - 1168 SF·FRONT YARD COVERAGE: 28.3%NOTE: MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE COVERAGE WITHIN REQUIRED FRONTYARD IS 50%.46 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 14362 Springer Avenue Meeting Date: June 27, 2018 Application: PDR18-0003/VAR18-0002 Address/APN: 14362 Springer Avenue (503-26-032) Property Owner: Ken Bahl From: Debbie Pedro, Community Development Director Report Prepared By: Christopher Riordan 47 Report to the Planning Commission 14362 Springer Avenue – Application # PDR18-0003/VAR18-0002 June 27, 2018 Page | 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a new 1,552 square foot two-story residence with basement. The project also includes a variance for a one-car garage when a two- car garage is required. No protected trees are requested for removal. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No.18-010 approving the project subject to conditions of approval included in Attachment 1. Pursuant to City Code Sections 15-45.060 (a)(1) and 15-70.020(a), Design Review Approval by the Planning Commission is required because the proposed residence would be a new two story structure and the project includes a request for a Variance from the prescribed development standards. PROJECT DATA Gross/Net Site Area: 3,454 square feet (.08 acres) Average Site Slope: Level Site General Plan Designation: M-10 (Medium Density Residential) Zoning: R-1-10,000 Proposed Allowed/Required Proposed Site Coverage Residence Decks/driveway/patios/walks/lightwell Total Proposed (structures) 964 sq. ft. 658 sq. ft. 1,622 sq. ft. (47%) 2,072 sq. ft. (60%) Floor Area House Garage Basement (exempt) Total Floor Area 1,255 sq. ft. 297 sq. ft. (939 sq. ft.) 1,552 sq. ft. Per Planning Commission for sites < 5,000 sq. ft. Height 24.6’ 26’ Setbacks Front: Right Side: Left Side: Rear: 1st Story 2nd Story 25’ 25’ 6’ 11’ 6’ 11’ 20’ 25’ 1st Story 2nd Story 25’ 25’ 6’ 11’ 6’ 11’ 20’ 25’ Grading Cut 360 CY Fill 10 CY Export 350 CY No grading limit in the R-1-10,000 zoning district 48 Report to the Planning Commission 14362 Springer Avenue – Application # PDR18-0003/VAR18-0002 June 27, 2018 Page | 3 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Site Description The project is located on Springer Avenue, northeast of 4th Street, in the R-1-10,000 zoning district. The existing home was originally constructed circa 1938 and the Wildwood Park tract it is located in pre-dates the City’s incorporation and subsequent zoning ordinance. The lot is considered substandard as it does not meet minimum lot size and dimensions for the zoning district. The 3,454 square foot lot is approximately 48 feet wide by 72 feet deep while the current standard for the district are lots with a minimum of 10,000 square feet, widths of 85 feet and depths of 115 feet. Several of the properties in the neighborhood have substandard sized lots including the properties adjacent to the subject site on the southeastern side of Springer Avenue. Furthermore, no garage currently exists on the property and several of the adjacent properties have a one-car garage. The site currently contains an existing one-story residence that will be demolished. Project Description Background On January 25, 2012, the Planning Commission approved a project for the site which included a 1,621 two-story residence with a 1,045 square foot basement which had a similar architectural design and height as the current project. That project included two variances for both a reduced front setback and a one car garage. A copy of the previously approved building elevations is included as Attachment #4. The applicant did not proceed with the construction of the project and the design review approval expired in January 2015. The current project complies with all setbacks but does include a request for the same variance to provide a one car garage instead of two. Historical Preservation Commission Review On April 14, 2009, the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) visited the subject site and reviewed the Historical Evaluation Report for the property. The HPC determined that the subject property was not historic and should not be listed on the City’s Historic Resource Inventory and agreed that the existing house could be demolished. Architecture/Design The proposed project would include the construction of a 1,552 square foot two-story home with an attached one car garage and a 939 square foot basement. The design of the project would most closely be affiliated with the Queen Anne architectural style. Some of the identifying features of the style include steeply pitched roofs, dominant front facing gable, bay windows, and an asymmetrical façade. The design includes a stucco exterior, steeply pitched gables, and brick accents. The proposed exterior colors are neutral tones including beige with grey and moss colored green trim. The applicant has provided a color and materials board, which will be available for review at the site visit and during the public hearing. Below is a list of the proposed exterior materials. 49 Report to the Planning Commission 14362 Springer Avenue – Application # PDR18-0003/VAR18-0002 June 27, 2018 Page | 4 Detail Colors and Materials Exterior Smooth Texture Stucco (beige color) Brick Veneer (red color) Trim (green color) Windows Aluminum Clad Wood (green color) Doors Wood (green color) Roof Synthetic Slate (dark grey) Garage Variance The project includes a variance for a one-car garage in lieu of a two-car garage due to the size and dimensions of the lot. The City Code requires two covered spaces within a garage for single family dwellings. The existing house to be demolished does not have a garage. The minimum width standard for a two-car garage is 19 feet and the minimum side setbacks on the subject lot are 6 feet per side, leaving 17 feet of width for the home’s façade. To meet the code requirements, the face of the garage would represent over 55% of the entire façade of the home. Under the proposed variance, the 10 foot wide garage would represent approximately 28% of the façade, leaving approximately 26 feet in width for the home’s entry, living room, and interior stairs. The below table indicates the lot size and garage type for the 10 properties fronting Springer Avenue between 4th Street and the north-east end of Wildwood Way. One of the 10 lots is not visible from the street and it is uncertain whether there is a garage on this property. Six of the 10 lots fronting Springer Avenue have a one-car garage. Thus, granting a variance for a one-car garage for the subject property would be consistent with other properties in the vicinity. Lot Size, Floor Area, and Garage Type Address *Lot Size *Floor Area / (FAR) Garage Type 14352 Springer Avenue 6,700 SF 1,200 SF (18%) 1-story 1 car attached 14361 Springer Avenue 4,800 SF 1,750 SF (36%) 2-story 1 car attached 14362 Springer Avenue 3,454 SF 950 SF (28%) 1-story No garage 14370 Springer Avenue 3,400 SF 1,100 SF (32%) 2-story 1 car attached 14378 Springer Avenue 3,300 SF 1,000 SF (33%) 1-story 1 car detached 14395 Wildwood Way (corner) 3,850 SF 1,400 SF (36%) 1½-story 1 car attached 14391 Springer Avenue (corner) 11,326 SF 1,800 SF (16%) 1-story Not visible 14400 Springer Avenue (corner) 3,200 SF 1,200 SF (30%) 1-story 2 car attached 14371 Springer Avenue 14,000 SF 2,500 SF (18%) 1-story 2 car attached 14345 Springer Avenue 10,000 SF 2,400 SF (24%) 2-story 2 car attached *Lot sizes and floor areas are approximate Furthermore, a one-car garage is an improvement to the current situation where no garage exists. Likewise, staff does not anticipate that a one-car garage in lieu of a two-car garage would have a significant effect on traffic volume, traffic circulation, or interference with the free flow of traffic on the streets. As noted earlier in the report, a variance for a one car garage was approved by the Planning Commission in 2012 and similar findings can be made for the current variance request. 50 Report to the Planning Commission 14362 Springer Avenue – Application # PDR18-0003/VAR18-0002 June 27, 2018 Page | 5 FINDINGS Design Review The findings required for issuance of a Design Review Approval pursuant to City Code Section Article 15-45.080 are set forth below and the Applicant has met the burden of proof to support making all of those required findings: a. Site development follows the natural contours of the site, minimizes grading, and is appropriate given the property’s natural constraints. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the site is relatively level and the project minimizes changes to the contours of the site. Grading will be limited to the excavation for the basement and contouring the site to direct water to landscaped areas Grading is also reduced as the new structure will be located in the same location as the existing structure with no significant change in the finished floor elevation. b. All protected trees shall be preserved, as provided in Article 15-50 (Tree Regulations). If constraints exist on the property, the number of protected trees, heritage trees, and native trees approved for removal shall be reduced to an absolute minimum. Removal of any smaller oak trees deemed to be in good health by the City Arborist shall be minimized using the criteria set forth in Section 15-50.080. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that no protected trees are proposed for removal. c. The height of the structure, its location on the site, and its architectural elements are designed to avoid unreasonable impacts to the privacy of adjoining properties and to community viewsheds. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the project will not have elevated decks or balconies to impact the privacy of adjoining properties. The finished floor of the new structure would be the approximately the same elevation as the existing structure. The second story windows are relatively small with high sill heights to reduce privacy impacts to abutting neighbors. The second story window on the eastern elevation will be constructed of frosted glass to minimize privacy impacts to the adjacent neighbor. No community view sheds are located in the vicinity of the project. d. The overall mass and height of the structure, and its architectural elements are in scale with the structure itself and with the neighborhood. The project will be compatible in terms of bulk and height with existing two-story residential structures on adjacent lots and those within the immediate neighborhood and within the same zoning district. The homes to the rear, right side, and directly across the street are two-story homes. The single story home on the left side of the property is located 51 Report to the Planning Commission 14362 Springer Avenue – Application # PDR18-0003/VAR18-0002 June 27, 2018 Page | 6 on a much larger lot than the subject property and has the benefit of a corner lot to access additional light and air. e. The landscape design minimizes hardscape in the front setback area and contains elements that are complementary to the neighborhood streetscape. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the hardscape proposed is minimal (driveway and walkway to the front door). The landscape plan indicates that more than 60% of the front setback area will be landscaped with drought resistant plants. f. Development of the site does not unreasonably impair the ability of adjoining properties to utilize solar energy. This finding can be made in the affirmative because the house is located approximately at the center of the site and the second story setbacks meet the minimum requirements which when taken together would minimize shadows being cast on adjacent properties which could limit or reduce their solar energy opportunities. g. The design of the structure and the site development plan is consistent with the Residential Design Handbook, pursuant to Section 15-45.055. This finding can be made in the affirmative because the proposed project incorporates applicable design policies and techniques from the Residential Design Handbook. The overall mass and height of the structure are in scale with the neighborhood; the structure is set back in proportion to the size and shape of the lot; site development follows contours and is appropriate given the property’s natural constraints. In addition, the proposed materials, colors, and details enhance the architecture in a well-composed, understated manner. h. On hillside lots, the location and the design of the structure avoid unreasonable impacts to ridgelines, significant hillside features, community viewsheds, and is in compliance with Section 15-13.100. This finding is not applicable to the project as the site is not considered a hillside lot. Variance Pursuant to City Code Section 15-70.060, the Planning Commission is empowered to grant variances in order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships that would result from a strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of certain zoning regulations. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon. The Applicant has met the burden of proof required to support the application for a variance as set forth below. (a) That because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, strict enforcement of the specified regulation would 52 Report to the Planning Commission 14362 Springer Avenue – Application # PDR18-0003/VAR18-0002 June 27, 2018 Page | 7 deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity and classified in the same zoning district. The property is located in a neighborhood that pre-dates the City’s incorporation and subsequent zoning ordinance. M any of the lots in the vicinity are below the minimum standard for the zoning district in terms of lot size, width, and depth, as described in subsection (b), below. Accordingly, many of the homes fronting Springer Avenue have a one-car garage. Likewise, the existing home on the subject property is located approximately seven feet from the front property line and does not have a garage. Given these special circumstances, strict enforcement of the two-car garage requirement would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity and the R-1-10,000 zoning district. (b) That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity and classified in the same zoning district. The standard dimensions for a lot in the R-1-10,000 zoning district are a minimum 85 feet wide by 115 feet deep and a minimum 10,000 square feet in area. The subject lot is approximately 48 feet wide by 72 feet deep and 3,454 square feet in area. The subject lot is smaller than many of the lots in the immediate vicinity and much smaller than standard lots in the R-1-10,000 zoning district. Several of the adjacent properties have one car garages. Thus, the granting of a variance for a one-car garage in lieu of a two-car garage would not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity and classified in the R-1-10,000 zoning district. (c) That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed home meets the required setbacks. The home on the subject property does not have a garage. The home has existed in this neighborhood without a garage since 1938. No known public health or safety concerns have been brought forward due the lack of a garage and no future impacts are anticipated. The addition of a one-car garage to the property will be an improvement over the current situation in the neighborhood. (d) That strict enforcement of the specified regulation is not required by either present or anticipated future traffic volume or traffic circulation on the site. The current home has existed in this neighborhood without a garage since 1938 without any known impacts on traffic volume or circulation. Thus, the addition of a one-car garage to the property should improve traffic volume and circulation in the neighborhood. (e) That the granting of the variance will not result in the parking or loading of vehicles on public streets in such a manner as to interfere with the free flow of traffic on the streets. The current home has existed in this neighborhood without a garage since 1938 without any known impacts on the parking or loading of vehicles on public streets. Thus, the addition of a one-car garage to the property should improve the free flow of traffic on the streets. Neighbor Notification and Correspondence A public notice was sent to property owners within 500 feet of the site. In addition, the public hearing notice and description of the project was published in the Saratoga News. The applicant 53 Report to the Planning Commission 14362 Springer Avenue – Application # PDR18-0003/VAR18-0002 June 27, 2018 Page | 8 provided four completed Neighbor Notification Forms. Two forms contained project related comments and are included as Attachment #2. The rear neighbor at 14433 Wildwood Way expressed a concern that the Bay laurel trees along the back property line might be removed – none of the trees are proposed for removal as part of the project. The adjacent neighbor to the north at 14352 Springer Way (the home to the left) is concerned about 1) privacy from the second story window on the east elevation, 2) the desire to have a fence constructed along the common line in the rear yard, and 3) construction hours and noise. The project has one 2’x 2’ window on the east elevation of the second story. This is a window in the master bathroom. The applicant has agreed to a condition of approval to install a “frosted glass” fixed window in this location to reduce privacy impact on the adjacent neighbor. The project also includes a condition of approval that the fence constructed between the common property line be a minimum of six feet in height. The City limits construction hours between 7:30 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. Monday through Friday and between the hours of 9:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. on Saturday. Residential construction is prohibited on Sunday and weekday holidays ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures”, Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction of three single-family residences in a residential area. The project, as proposed, is for the construction of a new residence in a suburban, residential area. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution of Approval No. 18-010 2. Neighbor Review Forms 3. Previously Approved Building Elevations 4. Development Plans (received June 6, 2018) 54 RESOLUTION NO: 18-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW PDR18-0003 AND VARIANCE VAR18-0002 14362 SPRINGER AVENUE APN # 503-26-032 WHEREAS, on January 25, 2018 an application was submitted by Steve Yang on behalf of Amit Bahl requesting Design Review and Variance approval to construct a new 1,552 square foot two- story residence with associated site improvements located at 14362 Springer Avenue (APN 503-26- 032). The project also includes a variance for a one-car garage when a two-car garage is required. No trees are proposed for removal. The site is located within the R-1-10,000 zoning district. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department completed an environmental assessment for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and recommends that the Planning Commission determine this project Categorically Exempt. WHEREAS, on June 27, 2018 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application, and considered evidence presented by City Staff, the applicant, and other interested parties. NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows: Section 1: The recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: The project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures”, Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction of one single-family residence in a residential area. Section 3: The project is consistent with the following Saratoga General Plan Policies: Land Use Goal 13 which provides that the City shall use the Design Review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings; Safety Element Site and Drainage Policy 3 which provides that the City shall require that landscaping and site drainage plans be submitted and approved during Design Review for a residence prior to issuance of permits; and Conservation Element Policy 6.0 which provides that the City shall protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. Section 4: The project is consistent with the Saratoga City Code in that the design and improvements are consistent with the design review findings. The overall mass and height of the structure are in scale with the neighborhood; the structure is set back in proportion to the size and shape of the lot; site development follows contours and is appropriate given the property’s natural constraints; the porch and entry are in scale with other structures in the neighborhood. In addition, the proposed materials, colors, and details enhance the architecture in a well-composed, understated manner. Section 5: The City of Saratoga Planning Commission hereby approves PDR18-0003 and VAR18-0002 located at 14362 Springer Avenue (APN 503-26-032), subject to the Findings, and Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Attachment 1 55 Lands of Bahl 14362 Springer Avenue Application #PDR18-0003 / VAR18-0002 Resolution #18-010 Page | 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on this 27th day of June 2018 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ____________________________ Joyce Hlava Chair, Planning Commission 56 Lands of Bahl 14362 Springer Avenue Application #PDR18-0003 / VAR18-0002 Resolution #18-010 Page | 3 Exhibit 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PDR18-0003 & VAR18-0002 14362 SPRINGER AVENUE APN # 503-26-032 GENERAL 1. All conditions below which are identified as permanent or for which an alternative period of time for applicability is specified shall run with the land and apply to the landowner’s successors in interest for such time period. No zoning clearance, or demolition, grading for this project shall be issued until proof is filed with the city that a certificate of approval documenting all applicable permanent or other term-specified conditions has been recorded by the applicant with the Santa Clara County Recorder’s office in form and content to the Community Development Director. If a condition is not “Permanent” or does not have a term specified, it shall remain in effect until the issuance by the City of Saratoga of a Certificate of Occupancy or its equivalent. 2. The Owner and Applicant will be mailed a statement after the time the Resolution granting this approval is duly executed, containing a statement of all amounts due to the City in connection with this application, including all consultant fees (collectively “processing fees”). This approval or permit shall expire sixty (60) days after the date said notice is mailed if all processing fees contained in the notice have not been paid in full. No Zoning Clearance or Demolition, Grading, or Building Permit may be issued until the City certifies that all processing fees have been paid in full (and, for deposit accounts, a surplus balance of $500 is maintained). 3. The Project shall maintain compliance with all applicable regulations of the State, County, City and/or other governmental agencies having jurisdiction including, without limitation, the requirements of the Saratoga City Code incorporated herein by this reference. 4. As a condition of this Approval, Owner and Applicant hereby agree to defend, indemnify and hold the City and its officers, officials, boards, commissions, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from and against: a. any and all claims, actions or proceedings to attack, set aside, void or annul any action on the subject application, or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done or made prior to said action; and b. any and all claims, demands, actions, expenses or liabilities arising from or in any manner relating to the performance of such construction, installation, alteration or grading work by the Owner and/or Applicant, their successors, or by any person acting on their behalf. In addition, prior to any Zoning Clearance, Owner and Applicant shall execute a separate agreement containing the details of this required Agreement to Indemnify, Hold Harmless and Defend, which shall be subject to prior approval as to form and content by the City Attorney. 57 Lands of Bahl 14362 Springer Avenue Application #PDR18-0003 / VAR18-0002 Resolution #18-010 Page | 4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 5. The owner/applicant shall comply with all City requirements regarding drainage, including but not limited to complying with the city approved Stormwater management plan. The project shall retain and/or detain any increase in design flow from the site, that is created by the proposed construction and grading project, such that adjacent down slope properties will not be negatively impacted by any increase in flow. Design must follow the current Santa Clara County Drainage Manual method criteria, as required by the building department. Retention/detention element design must follow the Drainage Manual guidelines, as required by the building department. 6. The development shall be located and constructed to include those features, and only those features, as shown on the Approved Plans date stamped June 6, 2018. All proposed changes to the approved plans must be submitted in writing with plans showing the changes, including a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. Such changes shall be subject to approval in accordance with City Code. 7. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit for staff approval, a Lighting Plan for the home’s exterior and landscaped areas. Proposed exterior lighting shall be limited to full-cut off & shielded fixtures with downward directed illumination so as not to shine on adjacent properties or public right-of-way. All proposed exterior lighting shall be designed to limit illumination to the site and avoid creating glare impacts to surrounding properties. 8. In order to comply with standards that minimize impacts to the neighborhood during site preparation and construction, the applicant shall comply with City Code Sections 7-30.060 and 16-75.050, with respect to noise, construction hours, maintenance of the construction site and other requirements stated in these sections. 9. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall prepare for review and approval by City staff a Construction Management Plan for the project which includes but is not limited to the following: a. Proposed construction worker parking area. b. Proposed construction hours that are consistent with City Code. c. Proposed construction/delivery vehicle staging or parking areas. d. Proposed traffic control plan with traffic control measures, any street closure, hours for delivery/earth moving or hauling, etc. To the extent possible, any deliveries, earth moving or hauling activities will be scheduled to avoid peak commute hours. e. Proposed construction material staging/storage areas. f. Location of project construction sign outlining permitted construction work hours, name of project contractor and the contact information for both homeowner and contractor. 10. All fences, walls and hedges shall conform to height requirements provided in City Code Section 15-29. 11. The final landscaping and irrigation plan submitted for Building Permit approval shall demonstrate how the project complies with the State Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and shall take into account the following: a. To the extent feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that 58 Lands of Bahl 14362 Springer Avenue Application #PDR18-0003 / VAR18-0002 Resolution #18-010 Page | 5 provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. b. To the extent feasible, pest resistant landscaping plants shall be used throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. c. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. d. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. e. Any proposed or required under grounding of utilities shall take into account potential damage to roots of protected trees 12. A locking mailbox approved for use by the U.S. Postal service shall be installed and in compliance with Saratoga Municipal Code section 6-25.030. The mailbox shall be installed prior to final inspection. 13. The second story bathroom window on the east elevation shall have obscure glass and be fixed so that it cannot be opened. 14. The fence along the north property line separating 14352 Springer Way and the project site shall be a minimum of six feet in height. FIRE DEPARTMENT 15. The owner/applicant shall comply with all Fire Department requirements. PUBLIC WORKS 16. Applicant / Owner shall obtain an encroachment permit for any and all improvements i n any City right-of-way or City easement including all new utilities prior to commencement of the work to implement this Design Review. 17. Remove and replace existing driveway and complete the new driveway with conforming grade to the street. Existing asphalt fronting the new residence shall be replaced after the new construction. See City Standard details for removal and new installation. Revise C1 to show the new vertical curb & gutter. 18. All existing utilities to existing home (Gas, Electric, Water, Sewer) shall be capped off prior to demolition of existing structures. Show on plan all new utilities services to the new residence. All utilities to the new residence shall be grounded. 19. All new/upgraded utilities shall be installed underground. 20. The permittee shall maintain the streets, sidewalks and other public rights of way in a clean, safe and usable condition. All spills of soil, rock or construction debris shall be removed from the public property. All adjacent property, both public and private, shall be m aintained in a clean, 59 Lands of Bahl 14362 Springer Avenue Application #PDR18-0003 / VAR18-0002 Resolution #18-010 Page | 6 safe and usable condition. 21. The Project Civil Engineer designed this project to comply with the grading recommendations in the geotechnical report. 22. All grading and earthwork activities shall conform to the approved plans and specific ations. All grading and earthwork activities shall be observed and approved by the soils engineer. The soils engineer shall be notified at least 48 hours prior to any grading or earthwork activities. Unobserved or unapproved work shall be removed and replaced under observation of the project soil engineer. 23. All project that create and/or replace more than 2,500 square feet and less than 10,000 square feet of impervious surface shall install one or more of the following site design measures: a. Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels for reuse. b. Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas. c. Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios onto vegetated areas. d. Direct runoff from driveways and/or uncovered parking lots onto vegetated areas. e. Construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces.2 f. Construct bike lanes, driveways, and/or uncovered parking lots with permeable surfaces. g. Show bio retention basin on property preferably on back of properties on plan C-1 24. Construction Site Control  Show on separate plan the erosion control per C.6 NPDES Permit No. CAS612008, November 19, 2015. Straw wattle perimeter of property and provide construction entrance during construction.  Owner shall implement construction site inspection and control to pre vent construction site discharges of pollutants into the storm drains. Plan shown on sheet C3 for the temporary erosion control during the construction of the new residence are adequate.  The City requires the construction site’s year -round effective erosion control, run-on and run- off control, sediment control, good site management, and non -storm water management through all phases of construction (including, but not limited to, site grading, building, and finishing of lots) until the site is fully stabili zed by landscaping or the installation of permanent erosion control measures.  City will conduct inspections on a monthly basis to determine compliance and determine the effectiveness of the BMPs in preventing the discharge of construction pollutants into the storm drain; Owner shall be required to timely correct all actual and potential discharges observed. Correction notices not addressed will eventually lead to A Notice of STOP WORK violation during the construction of this project 25. Prior to the Building final, all Public works conditions including drainage, grading, and landscaping of the site shall be completed per approved plans. 60 Lands of Bahl 14362 Springer Avenue Application #PDR18-0003 / VAR18-0002 Resolution #18-010 Page | 7 BUILDING DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL 26. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans shall be submitted to the Building Division. These plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance. The construction plans shall, at a minimum include the following: a. Architectural drawings and other plan sheets consistent with those identified as Exhibit “A” on file with the Community Development Department. b. All additional drawings, plans, maps, reports, notes, and/or materials required by the Building Division. c. This signed and dated Resolution printed onto separate construction plan pages. d. The site plan shall contain a note with the following language: “Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the Licensed Land Surveyor of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks comply with the Approved Plans,” which note shall represent a condition which must be satisfied to remain in compliance with this Design Review Approval. 61 Project Address: City of Saratoga Neighbor Notification Form 14362 Springer A venue A project is proposed at the above address. The City asks that you sign this form to indicate you have had an opportunity to review and comment on the proposal. Your signature is DQJ; an acceptance of the plans, only an acknowledgement that you have had an opportunity to comment. IMPORTANT NOTE FROIVI CITY: These plans are PRELIMINARY ONLY and may change as the project moves forward. Architectural Plans are protected under copyright law. The applicant should allow you to view the plans but is not required to give you a physical copy. Once the application is submitted, you may review a full sized set of plans at City Hall during normal business hours. The applicant should inform you when the plans will be su bmitted. Please contact the City at 408-868-1222 If you have any questions. This notice is being provided to all of the adjoining property owners and the property owner(s) across the street from the project address. The City will send an additional notice to adjacent neighbors prior to a decision being made on the project. /\ Neighbor Name: / / /,, 'T .. \... -· , rA · Date: /l' ,,_IC>"/ ff -This enables the City to contact you if they have any questions Please address any initial concerns below (attach additional sheets if necessary): Feel free to mail this form directly to the City: City of Saratoga Planning Department; .1377/ F.1ui.tvale Avenue; Saratoga CA 95070 p £ J ,'7/..,L- -• # 1 . v / c-"'· S c-/�·,r1"c;;;f ,TJ /r + ·ti 8.� C) �};C),/f"l k Revised February 2014 ,,.. r�Nt"·f? Attachment 2 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 SANTA CLARA COUNTYC-1 DATE: SHEET NO. SCALE: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY:RW ENGINEERING, INC.DATEBYREVISIONNO.OF SHEETSGRADING ANDDRAINAGE PLANAPN: 503-26-032BASIS OF BEARINGS: SITE BENCHMARK: 78 SWALE1TYPICAL GRADING AROUND FOUNDATION2 DETAILS3 SANTA CLARA COUNTYC-2 DATE: SHEET NO. SCALE: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY:RW ENGINEERING, INC.DATEBYREVISIONNO.OF SHEETS APN: 503-26-032POP-UP EMITTER 4 AREA DRAIN DETAIL WITHIN STAIR/LIGHTWELL 5 SUMP WELL DETAIL 79 (TO BE MAINTAINED)STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE HYDROSEEDING: GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROLPLANSANTA CLARA COUNTYC-3 DATE: SHEET NO. SCALE: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY:RW ENGINEERING, INC.DATEBYREVISIONNO.OF SHEETS LEGEND APN: 503-26-03280 81 82 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 15235 Bellecourt Meeting Date: June 27, 2018 Application: PDR17-0016/ARB17-0059 Address/APN: 15235 Bellecourt (510-03-013) Property Owner: Davis Zhang From: Debbie Pedro, Community Development Director Report Prepared By: Christopher Riordan 83 Report to the Planning Commission 15235 Bellecourt – Application # PDR17-0016/ARB17-0059 June 27, 2018 Page | 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for a new 5,642 square foot two story residence. Five protected trees are proposed for removal. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No.18-011 approving the project subject to conditions of approval included in Attachment 1. Pursuant to City Code Section 15-45.060 (a)(1), Design Review Approval by the Planning Commission is required because the project is a new two-story residence. PROJECT DATA Gross/Net Site Area: 35,283 sq. ft. gross/net (0.81 acres) Average Site Slope: Level Site General Plan Designation: RVLD (Very Low Density Residential) Zoning: R-1-40,000 Proposed Allowed/Required Proposed Site Coverage Residence/Garage Walkways/patio Driveway Total Proposed (structures) 6,304 sq. ft. 855 sq. ft. 920 sq. ft. 8,059 sq. ft. (23%) 12,349 sq. ft. (35%) Floor Area First Story Second Story Garage Total Floor Area 4,471.8 sq. ft. 693.6 sq. ft. 476.7 sq. ft. 5,642.1 sq. ft. 5,688 sq. ft. Height 24’ 26’ Setbacks Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: 1st Story 2nd Story 53’5” 86’0” 20’ 63’ 20’ 31’3” 123’5” 278’3” 1st Story 2nd Story 30’ 30’ 20’ 25’ 20’ 25’ 50’ 60’ Grading Cut 642 CY Fill 258 CY Export 384 CY No grading limit in the R-1-40,000 zoning district 84 Report to the Planning Commission 15235 Bellecourt – Application # PDR17-0016/ARB17-0059 June 27, 2018 Page | 3 SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Site Description The project site is located at 15235 Bellecourt Avenue between Saratoga-Los Gatos Road and Glen Una Drive. A two story single-family home and related site improvements including a detached garage and circular driveway are located on site. Adjacent uses on both sides, to the rear, and across the street consist of both one and two-story single family residences. A total of 39 trees were inventoried by the project arborist including Coast live oaks, Deodar cedar, and Bay laurel. Project Description The project would include the construction of a new approximately 5,642 square feet, 24’ tall, two-story single family residence with a detached two car garage. All structures and hardscape would be removed. Five trees are proposed for removal including a redwood, two Coast live oaks, one Black walnut, and one Deodar Cedar. Architecture/Design The project would have a “contemporary” architectural style. The building footprint is located in the center of the site and set back 53 feet from the front property line at the same distance as the existing residence. The second story element is 24 feet in height, 693 square feet in size, and located at the right side of the building which increases the architectural compatibility with the adjacent two story structure. A portion of the structure near the left of the building footprint would be single-story, 20 feet tall, with clerestory windows facing the front, left side, and rear and would be compatible in height with the adjacent one story residence on the left. Architectural materials to support the architectural style include stucco, metal, and horizontal wood siding. Lower portions of the roof would be covered with a standing seam metal roof while the upper portions of the roof would feature composite asphalt shingles. Wood trellises would be located in front of the garage, near the front door to act as an entrance feature, and over the rear patio. The detached garage would be located forward of the main building and along the left property line and connected by a covered breezeway to the main residence. A five foot tall fence perpendicular to the front wall of the garage would provide a protected interior courtyard from the street. A circular driveway composed of permeable pavers and located in the approximate location as the existing driveway will provide vehicle access. The variety of exterior materials, large front and rear setbacks, varying heights of the architectural features and the wide building footprint provide architectural articulation to break up the mass of the home and improve its compatibility with structures on adjacent sites. The applicant has provided a color and materials board which will be available for review at the site visit and during the public hearing. Below is a list of the proposed exterior materials. Detail Colors and Materials Exterior Stain Grade Cedar Wood Siding / White Colored Smooth Stucco Windows Dark Bronze Aluminum Wood Windows Doors Red Colored Metal Front Entrance Door Stain Grade Cedar Wood Siding Garage Door Roof Standing Seam Metal (First Level) Composite Shingles (Upper Level) 85 Report to the Planning Commission 15235 Bellecourt – Application # PDR17-0016/ARB17-0059 June 27, 2018 Page | 4 Trees The site plan indicates that seven trees are proposed for removal. Two of the trees shown for removal include a 6” oak tree near the front of the building footprint and a 6” oak along the right side of the building. The 6” oak along the right side of the building is mislabeled on the plan and is identified in the arborist report as a dawn redwood. During a site visit the City Arborist confirmed that these two trees were actually less than 6” in diameter and were not protected. The additional five trees proposed for removal are protected. These include one 12” Redwood tree near the street in conflict with the location of the new driveway, two Coast live oaks, one that is 36” and the other 17” in diameter that are in conflict with the proposed building footprint, one 10” Black walnut at the rear of the site that is in poor condition and not suitable for retention, and one 42” Deodar cedar that likely would not survive the impact of construction. All remaining protected trees in the vicinity of the project would be protected prior to building permit issuance and throughout the duration of the project. Tree protection fencing is required to be installed prior to the issuance of building permits. Details of the arborist’s findings and descriptions of the trees to be removed and preserved are included in the Arborist Report (Attachment 2). Landscaping The existing landscaping of the front yard area consists of a circular asphalt driveway, lawn area and existing oak and redwood trees. An existing hedge at the front property line near the center of the circular driveway screens views of the property from the street. All of the existing hardscape area will be removed including the existing lawn area and two trees which were discussed in the preceding paragraphs. The landscape plan (sheet L1.1 of the Development Plans) indicates that a new impervious paver circular driveway will be installed in approximately the same location as the existing driveway. New landscaping of approximately 2,875 square feet is proposed which will include drought tolerant flowering trees, shrubs, and groundcovers. The existing tall hedge will be maintained. The landscaping is subject to the City’s regulations regarding Water Efficient Landscaping because the project would install more than 500 feet of new landscape area. The project includes a condition that the final landscaping plan submitted for building permit must demonstrate how the project complies with the State Efficient Landscape Ordinance. FINDINGS The findings required for issuance of a Design Review Approval pursuant to City Code Section Article 15-45.080 are set forth below and the Applicant has met the burden of proof to support making all of those required findings: a. Site development follows the natural contours of the site, minimizes grading, and is appropriate given the property’s natural constraints. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the project minimizes changes to the contours of the site. Grading will be limited to contouring the site to direct water to landscaped areas and onsite retention features. Grading is also reduced as the new structure 86 Report to the Planning Commission 15235 Bellecourt – Application # PDR17-0016/ARB17-0059 June 27, 2018 Page | 5 will be located in the approximate same location as the existing structure, does not include a basement, and there is no significant change in the finished floor elevation. b. All protected trees shall be preserved, as provided in Article 15-50 (Tree Regulations). If constraints exist on the property, the number of protected trees, heritage trees, and native trees approved for removal shall be reduced to an absolute minimum. Removal of any smaller oak trees deemed to be in good health by the City Arborist shall be minimized using the criteria set forth in Section 15-50.080. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the number of trees to be removed is being kept to a minimum and limited to five trees either in poor condition or in conflict with the location of the project. A total of 33 protected trees remain in the vicinity of the project and with the required replacement trees, the number of trees on the site will increase. All remaining protected trees in the vicinity of the project would be protected prior to building permit issuance and throughout the duration of the project. Tree protection fencing is required to be installed prior to the issuance of building permits and shall remain in place for the duration of the project. c. The height of the structure, its location on the site, and its architectural elements are designed to avoid unreasonable impacts to the privacy of adjoining properties and to community viewsheds. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that though the project is a two story structure, the second story element is significantly smaller than the first story with eaves and roof lines consistent in height with adjacent residences. The finished floor of the new structure would be approximately the same elevation as the existing structure. The side elevations of the second story element have clerestory windows to minimize privacy impacts on the adjacent neighbors to the north and south. The project has no second story balconies. No community view sheds are located in the vicinity of the project. d. The overall mass and height of the structure, and its architectural elements are in scale with the structure itself and with the neighborhood. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the project is a two story residence in a neighborhood with both one and two story homes, the project concentrates the massing toward the center of the site with the height concentrated toward the middle of the building footprint and is lower at both sides to increase compatibility with neighboring one story homes to the south and the two story home to the north. The project includes architectural elements consistent with the ‘contemporary’ architectural style which are in scale with the structure and the neighborhood. e. The landscape design minimizes hardscape in the front setback area and contains elements that are complementary to the neighborhood streetscape. 87 Report to the Planning Commission 15235 Bellecourt – Application # PDR17-0016/ARB17-0059 June 27, 2018 Page | 6 This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the existing landscaping is proposed to remain. Hardscape would be less than 18% of the front setback area and limited to a circular impervious paver driveway. f. Development of the site does not unreasonably impair the ability of adjoining properties to utilize solar energy. This finding can be made in the affirmative in that the tallest elements of the structure are located at the center of the site with the lower portions of the building at both side property lines, the structure would not unreasonably impair the utilization of solar energy. g. The design of the structure and the site development plan is consistent with the Residential Design Handbook, pursuant to Section 15-45.055. This finding can be made in the affirmative because the proposed project incorporates applicable design policies and techniques from the Residential Design Handbook. The overall mass and height of the structure are greater than surrounding homes but these differences are tempered through the use of appropriate massing and horizontal building forms; the structure is sited in proportion to the size and shape of the lot; site development follows contours and is appropriate given the property’s natural constraints. In addition, the proposed materials, colors, and details enhance the architecture in a well-composed manner which is complementary to the architectural style of the home. h. On hillside lots, the location and the design of the structure avoid unreasonable impacts to ridgelines, significant hillside features, community viewsheds, and is in compliance with Section 15-13.100. This finding is not applicable to the project as the site is not considered a hillside lot. Neighbor Notification and Correspondence A public notice was sent to property owners within 500 feet of the site. In addition, the public hearing notice and description of the project was published in the Saratoga News. The applicant provided five completed Neighbor Notification Forms – none of the forms included negative project related concerns. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures”, Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction of three single-family residences in a residential area. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution of Approval No. 18-011 2. Arborist Report dated May 22, 2018 3. Development Plans (received June 8, 2018) 88 RESOLUTION NO: 18-011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SARATOGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW PDR17-0016 AND ARBORIST REPORT ARB17-0059 15235 BELLECOURT (510-03-013) WHEREAS, on December 4, 2017 an application was submitted by Davide Giannella on behalf of Davis Zhang requesting Design Review approval to construct a new 5,642 square foot two-story residence with associated site improvements located 15235 Bellecourt (APN 510-03- 013). The height of the proposed residence is approximately 24 feet. Five protected trees are proposed for removal. The site is located within the R-1-40,000 zoning district. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department completed an environmental assessment for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and recommends that the Planning Commission determine this project Categorically Exempt. WHEREAS, on June 27, 2018 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application, and considered evidence presented by City Staff, the applicant, and other interested parties. NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Saratoga hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows: Section 1: The recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: The project is Categorically Exempt from the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant Section 15303, “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures”, Class 3 (a) of the Public Resources Code (CEQA). This exemption allows for the construction of one single-family residence in a residential area. Section 3: The project is consistent with the following Saratoga General Plan Policies: Land Use Goal 13 which provides that the City shall use the Design Review process to assure that the new construction and major additions thereto are compatible with the site and the adjacent surroundings; Safety Element Site and Drainage Policy 3 which provides that the City shall require that landscaping and site drainage plans be submitted and approved during Design Review for a residence prior to issuance of permits; and Conservation Element Policy 6.0 which provides that the City shall protect the existing rural atmosphere of Saratoga by carefully considering the visual impact of new development. Section 4: The project is consistent with the Saratoga City Code in that the design and improvements are consistent with the design review findings. The overall mass and height of the structure are in scale with the neighborhood; the structure is set back in proportion to the size and shape of the lot; site development follows contours and is appropriate given the property’s natural constraints; the porch and entry are in scale with other structures in the neighborhood. In addition, the proposed materials, colors, and details enhance the architecture in a well-composed, understated manner. Attachment 1 89 Lands of Zhang 15235 Bellecourt Application #PDR17-0016ARB17-0059 Resolution #18-011 Page | 2 Section 5: The City of Saratoga Planning Commission hereby approves PDR17-0016 and ARB17-0059 located at 15235 Bellecourt (APN 510-03-013), subject to the Findings, and Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit 1. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Saratoga Planning Commission on this 27th day of May 2018 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ____________________________ Joyce Hlava Chair, Planning Commission 90 Lands of Zhang 15235 Bellecourt Application #PDR17-0016ARB17-0059 Resolution #18-011 Page | 3 Exhibit 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PDR17-0016 & ARB17-0059 15235 BELLECOURT (APN 510-03-013) GENERAL 1. All conditions below which are identified as permanent or for which an alternative period of time for applicability is specified shall run with the land and apply to the landowner’s successors in interest for such time period. No zoning clearance, or demolition, grading for this project shall be issued until proof is filed with the city that a certificate of approval documenting all applicable permanent or other term-specified conditions has been recorded by the applicant with the Santa Clara County Recorder’s office in form and content to the Community Development Director. If a condition is not “Permanent” or does not have a term specified, it shall remain in effect until the issuance by the City of Saratoga of a Certificate of Occupancy or its equivalent. 2. The Owner and Applicant will be mailed a statement after the time the Resolution granting this approval is duly executed, containing a statement of all amounts due to the City in connection with this application, including all consultant fees (collectively “processing fees”). This approval or permit shall expire sixty (60) days after the date said notice is mailed if all processing fees contained in the notice have not been paid in full. No Zoning Clearance or Demolition, Grading, or Building Permit may be issued until the City certifies that all processing fees have been paid in full (and, for deposit accounts, a surplus balance of $500 is maintained). 3. The Project shall maintain compliance with all applicable regulations of the State, County, City and/or other governmental agencies having jurisdiction including, without limitation, the requirements of the Saratoga City Code incorporated herein by this reference. 4. As a condition of this Approval, Owner and Applicant hereby agree to defend, indemnify and hold the City and its officers, officials, boards, commissions, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from and against: a. any and all claims, actions or proceedings to attack, set aside, void or annul any action on the subject application, or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done or made prior to said action; and b. any and all claims, demands, actions, expenses or liabilities arising from or in any manner relating to the performance of such construction, installation, alteration or grading work by the Owner and/or Applicant, their successors, or by any person acting on their behalf. 91 Lands of Zhang 15235 Bellecourt Application #PDR17-0016ARB17-0059 Resolution #18-011 Page | 4 In addition, prior to any Zoning Clearance, Owner and Applicant shall execute a separate agreement containing the details of this required Agreement to Indemnify, Hold Harmless and Defend, which shall be subject to prior approval as to form and content by the City Attorney. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 5. The owner/applicant shall comply with all City requirements regarding drainage, including but not limited to complying with the city approved Stormwater management plan. The project shall retain and/or detain any increase in design flow from the site, that is created by the proposed construction and grading project, such that adjacent down slope properties will not be negatively impacted by any increase in flow. Design must follow the current Santa Clara County Drainage Manual method criteria, as required by the building department. Retention/detention element design must follow the Drainage Manual guidelines, as required by the building department. 6. The development shall be located and constructed to include those features, and only those features, as shown on the Approved Plans date stamped June 8, 2018. All proposed changes to the approved plans must be submitted in writing with plans showing the changes, including a clouded set of plans highlighting the changes. Such changes shall be subject to approval in accordance with City Code. 7. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit for staff approval, a Lighting Plan for the home’s exterior and landscaped areas. Proposed exterior lighting shall be limited to full-cut off & shielded fixtures with downward directed illumination so as not to shine on adjacent properties or public right-of-way. All proposed exterior lighting shall be designed to limit illumination to the site and avoid creating glare impacts to surrounding properties. 8. In order to comply with standards that minimize impacts to the neighborhood during site preparation and construction, the applicant shall comply with City Code Sections 7-30.060 and 16-75.050, with respect to noise, construction hours, maintenance of the construction site and other requirements stated in these sections. 9. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall prepare for review and approval by City staff a Construction Management Plan for the project which includes but is not limited to the following: a. Proposed construction worker parking area. b. Proposed construction hours that are consistent with City Code. c. Proposed construction/delivery vehicle staging or parking areas. d. Proposed traffic control plan with traffic control measures, any street closure, hours for delivery/earth moving or hauling, etc. To the extent possible, any deliveries, earth moving or hauling activities will be scheduled to avoid peak commute hours. e. Proposed construction material staging/storage areas. f. Location of project construction sign outlining permitted construction work hours, name of project contractor and the contact information for both homeowner and contractor. 92 Lands of Zhang 15235 Bellecourt Application #PDR17-0016ARB17-0059 Resolution #18-011 Page | 5 10. All fences, walls and hedges shall conform to height requirements provided in City Code Section 15-29. 11. The final landscaping and irrigation plan submitted for Building Permit approval shall demonstrate how the project complies with the State Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and shall take into account the following: a. To the extent feasible, landscaping shall be designed and operated to treat storm water runoff by incorporating elements that collect, detain and infiltrate runoff. In areas that provide detention of water, plants that are tolerant of saturated soil conditions and prolong exposure to water shall be specified. b. To the extent feasible, pest resistant landscaping plants shall be used throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. c. Plant materials selected shall be appropriate to site specific characteristics such as soil type, topography, climate, amount and timing of sunlight, prevailing winds, rainfall, air movement, patterns of land use, ecological consistency and plant interactions to ensure successful establishment. d. Pest resistant landscaping plants shall be considered for use throughout the landscaped area, especially along any hardscape area. e. Any proposed or required under grounding of utilities shall take into account potential damage to roots of protected trees 12. A locking mailbox approved for use by the U.S. Postal service shall be installed and in compliance with Saratoga Municipal Code section 6-25.030. The mailbox shall be installed prior to final inspection. FIRE DEPARTMENT 13. The owner/applicant shall comply with all Fire Department requirements. ARBORIST 14. All requirements in the City Arborist Report dated May 22, 2018 are hereby adopted as conditions of approval and shall be implemented as part of the approved plans. PUBLIC WORKS 15. Applicant / Owner shall obtain an encroachment permit for any and all improvements in any City right-of-way or City easement including all new utilities prior to commencement of the work to implement this Design Review. 16. Applicant / Owner shall remove and replace existing dip and settled asphalt driveway approach with a new one conforming to existing adjoining grade. 17. The new approach and driveway shall conform to existing adjoining grade. See Saratoga 93 Lands of Zhang 15235 Bellecourt Application #PDR17-0016ARB17-0059 Resolution #18-011 Page | 6 Standard details for removal and new installation. The new flow line shall conform to existing flow lines and grade. See City Standard details for removal and new installation. 18. All existing utilities to existing home (Gas, Electric, Water, Sewer) shall be capped off prior to demolition of existing structures. Shown on plan all new utilities services to the new residence. 19. All utilities to the new residence shall be installed underground. New water meter require for Fire suppression system to new residence. 20. Provide a site grading and drainage plan prepared by a licensed Civil engineer. BUILDING DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL 21. Four (4) sets of complete construction plans shall be submitted to the Building Division. These plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City prior to issuance of Zoning Clearance. The construction plans shall, at a minimum include the following: a. Architectural drawings and other plan sheets consistent with those identified as Exhibit “A” on file with the Community Development Department. b. Arborist Report, dated April 17, 2018 printed onto a separate plan page. c. All additional drawings, plans, maps, reports, notes, and/or materials required by the Building Division. c. This signed and dated Resolution printed onto separate construction plan pages. d. The site plan shall contain a note with the following language: “Prior to foundation inspection by the City, the Licensed Land Surveyor of record shall provide a written certification that all building setbacks comply with the Approved Plans,” which note shall represent a condition which must be satisfied to remain in compliance with this Design Review Approval. 94 Community Development Department City of Saratoga 13777 Fruitvale Avenue Saratoga, California 95070 ARBORIST REPORT Application No. ARB17-0059 Prepared by Kate Bear, City Arborist Site: 15235 Belle Court Phone: (408) 868-1276 Owner: Davis Zhang Email: kbear@saratoga.ca.us APN: 510-03-013 Email:luckylaxster@gmail.com Report History: Final report Date: May 22, 2018 PROJECT SCOPE: The applicant has submitted plans to demolish the existing house and build a new two story house with a detached two-car garage. Five trees protected by City Code (132, 141, 142, 159 and 165) are requested for removal to construct the project. STATUS: Approved by City Arborist, with attached conditions. PROJECT DATA IN BRIEF: Tree bond – Required - $46,120 Tree fencing – Required – See Conditions of Approval and attached map. Tree removals – Trees 312, 141, 142 and 165 are approved for removal once building permits have been issued. Replacement trees – Required = $34,190 ATTACHMENTS: 1 – Findings 2 – Tree Removal Criteria 3 – Tree Information 4 – Conditions of Approval 5 – Map Showing Tree Protection 1 Attachment 2 95 15235 Belle Court Attachment 1 FINDINGS: Tree Removals According to Section 15-50.080 of the City Code, whenever a tree is requested for removal as part of a project, certain findings must be made and specific tree removal criteria met. Five trees (132, 141, 142, 159 and 165) are in conflict with the new house. They meet the City’s criteria allowing them to be removed and replaced as part of the project, once building division permits have been obtained. Attachment 2 contains the tree removal criteria for reference. Table 1: Summary of Tree Removal Criteria that are met Tree No. Species Criteria met Comments 132 Redwood 1, 4, 7, 9 In conflict with driveway 141, 142 Coast live oak 1, 4, 7, 9 In conflict with proposed house. Tree 141 is very close to the existing house and likely to be damaged during demolition. Tree 142 has a significant lean. 159 Black walnut 1, 4, 7, 9 Poor suitability for retention 165 Deodar cedar 1, 4, 7, 9 In the center of the back yard patio – demo and new construction likely to significantly affect the tree. New Construction Based on the information provided, and as conditioned, this project complies with the requirements for the setback of new construction from existing trees under Section 15- 50.120 of the City Code. Tree Preservation Plan Section 15-50.140 of the City Code requires a Tree Preservation Plan for this project. To satisfy this requirement the following shall be copied onto a plan sheet and included in the final sets of plans: 1) The recommendations and Appendices B and D from the submitted arborist report dated August 11, 2017; 2) The Project Data in Brief, the Conditions of Approval, and the map showing tree protection from this report. 2 96 15235 Belle Court Attachment 2 TREE REMOVAL CRITERIA Criteria that permit the removal of a protected tree are listed below. This information is from Article 15-50.080 of the City Code and is applied to any tree requested for removal as part of the project. If findings are made that meet the criteria listed below, the tree(s) may be approved for removal and replacement during construction. (1) The condition of the tree with respect to disease, imminent danger of falling, proximity to existing or proposed structures and interference with utility services, and whether the tree is a Dead tree or a Fallen tree. (2) The necessity to remove the tree because of physical damage or threatened damage to improvements or impervious surfaces on the property. (3) The topography of the land and the effect of the tree removal upon erosion, soil retention and the diversion or increased flow of surface waters, particularly on steep slopes. (4) The number, species, size and location of existing trees in the area and the effect the removal would have upon shade, privacy impact, scenic beauty, property values, erosion control, and the general welfare of residents in the area. (5) The age and number of healthy trees the property is able to support according to good forestry practices. (6) Whether or not there are any alternatives that would allow for retaining or not encroaching on the protected tree. (7) Whether the approval of the request would be contrary to or in conflict with the general purpose and intent of this Article. (8) Any other information relevant to the public health, safety, or general welfare and the purposes of this ordinance as set forth in Section 15-50.010 (9) The necessity to remove the tree for economic or other enjoyment of the property when there is no other feasible alternative to the removal. (10) The necessity to remove the tree for installation and efficient operation of solar panels, subject to the requirements that the tree(s) to be removed, shall not be removed until solar panels have been installed and replacement trees planted in conformance with the City Arborist's recommendation. 3 97 13525 Belle Court Attachment 3 TREE INFORMATION: Arborist Report reviewed: Preparer: Richard Gessner, Monarch Consulting Arborists, LLC Date of Report: August 11, 2017 An arborist report was submitted for this project that inventoried 40 trees protected by Saratoga City Code. Information on the condition of each tree, potential impacts from construction, suitability for preservation, appraised values and tree protection recommendations was provided. A table summarizing information about each tree is below. Five trees (132, 141, 142, 159 and 165) protected by Saratoga City Code are requested for removal to construct this project. 4 98 13525 Belle Court Attachment 3 Table 2: Tree information from August 11, 2017 arborist report. 5 99 13525 Belle Court Attachment 3 Table 2 continued: Tree information from August 11, 2017 arborist report. 6 100 13525 Belle Court Attachment 3 Table 2 continued: Tree information from August 11, 2017 arborist report. 7 101 13525 Belle Court Attachment 3 Table 3: Appraised values from August 11, 2017 arborist report. 8 102 13525 Belle Court Attachment 3 Table 3 continued: Appraised values from August 11, 2017 arborist report. 9 103 13525 Belle Court Attachment 3 Table 3 continued: Appraised values from August 11, 2017 arborist report. 10 104 13525 Belle Court Attachment 3 Table 3 continued: Appraised values from August 11, 2017 arborist report. 11 105 15235 Belle Court Attachment 4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Owner, Architect, Contractor: It is the responsibility of the owner, architect and contractor to be familiar with the information in this report and implement the required conditions. 2. Permit: Receipt of a Planning or Building permit does not relieve applicant of his responsibilities for protecting trees per City Code Article 15-50 on all construction work. 3. Final Plan Sets: a. Shall include the recommendations and tree information from the arborist report by Richard Gessner dated August 11, 2017. b. Shall include the recommendations and tree information copied on a plan sheet, titled “Tree Preservation”. c. Shall include the Project Data in Brief, the Conditions of Approval, and the map showing tree protection sections of the City Arborist report May 22 2018. 4. Tree Protection Security Deposit: a. Is required per City Ordinance 15-50.080. b. Shall be $46,120 for tree(s) 136 – 138, 140, 143, 158, 162, 164 and 166 – 171. c. Shall be obtained by the owner and filed with the Community Development Department before obtaining Building Division permits. d. May be in the form of cash, check, credit card payment or a bond. e. Shall remain in place for the duration of construction of the project. f. May be released once the project has been completed, inspected and approved by the City Arborist. 5. Tree Protection – Fencing, etc: a. Shall be installed as shown on the attached map. b. Shall be shown on the Site Plan. c. Shall be established prior to the arrival of construction equipment or materials on site. d. Shall be comprised of six-foot high chain link fencing mounted on eight-foot tall, 2-inch diameter galvanized posts, driven 24 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet apart. e. Shall be posted with signs saying “TREE PROTECTION FENCE - DO NOT MOVE OR REMOVE WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM CITY ARBORIST, KATE BEAR (408) 868-1276”. f. Wherever protection is needed outside of fences, unprocessed wood chips, or approved equivalent, shall be placed to the edge of the tree’s canopy to a depth of 6 inches. g. Call City Arborist, Kate Bear at (408) 868-1276 for an inspection of tree protection fencing once it has been installed. This is required prior to obtaining building division permits. h. Tree protection fencing shall remain undisturbed throughout the construction until final inspection. 6. Construction: All construction activities shall be conducted outside tree protection fencing unless permitted as conditioned below. These activities include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: demolition, grading, trenching for utility installation, equipment cleaning, stockpiling and dumping materials (including soil fill), and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 12 106 15235 Belle Court Attachment 4 7. Work inside fenced areas: a. Requires field meeting with City Arborist before performing work. b. Requires City Arborist approval prior to performing work. c. Requires Project Arborist on site to monitor work. 8. Project Arborist: a. Shall be Richard Gessner unless otherwise approved by the City Arborist. b. Shall visit the site every three weeks during grading, trenching or digging activities. c. Shall provide a letter to the Applicant for the City at the end of the project. The letter shall document the work performed around trees, include photos of the work in progress, and provide information on the condition of the trees following construction. d. Shall supervise any permitted pruning or root pruning of trees on site. Roots of protected trees measuring two inches in diameter or more shall not be cut without prior approval of the Project Arborist. Roots measuring less than two inches in diameter may be cut using a sharp pruning tool. e. The Project Arborist shall be on site to monitor all work within 15 feet of trees 136 -138, 140 and 162 – 171. 9. Tree removal: a. Trees 132, 141, 142, 159 and 165 meet the criteria for removal and may be removed once building division permits have been obtained. b. No protected tree authorized for removal or encroachment pursuant to this project may be removed or encroached upon until the issuance of the applicable permit from the building division for the approved project. c. Should any tree be damaged beyond repair, new trees shall be required to replace the tree. If there is insufficient room to plant the necessary number of new trees, some of the value for trees may be paid into the City’s Tree Fund. 10. New trees: a. New trees equal to $34,190 shall be planted as part of the project before final inspection and occupancy of the new home. New trees may be of any species. b. Trees permitted for removal shall be replaced on or off site according to good forestry practices, and shall provide equivalent value in terms of aesthetic and environmental quality, size, height, location, appearance and other significant beneficial characteristics of the removed trees. c. Replacement values for new trees are listed below. 15 gallon = $350 24 inch box = $500 36 inch box = $1,500 24 inch box = $5,000 60 inch box = 7,000 72 inch box = $15,000 d. At least two new trees shall be planted in the front yard. e. The rest of the replacement trees may be planted anywhere on the property as long as they do not encroach on retained trees. f. Only drought tolerant plants that are compatible with oaks are permitted under the outer half of the canopy of oak trees on site. Water loving plants and lawns are not permitted under oak tree canopies. 11. Final inspection: At the end of the project, when the contractor wants to remove tree protection fencing and have the tree protection security deposit released by the City, call City Arborist for a final inspection. 13 107 Legend Tree Protection Fencing 15235 Belle Court Attachment 5 14 108 ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL, UNPUBLISHED WORK OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE Davide Giannella Sheet Scale : AS NOTEDDrawn By DG6/8/2018Reviewed By DGZhang Residence15235 Bellecourt Ave. Saratoga CA234601644 N. Santa Cruz Ave. Suite 6 Los Gatos, California 95030 T. 408-219-0601 dg@acadia-architecture.com A 1.0 PROJECT INFORevisionRevisionRevisionacadiaarchitecture 12-31-19 PROJECT TEAM SCOPE OF WORK LOCATION MAPABBREVIATIONS (REFER TO CONSULTANT DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL ABBREVIATIONS) AC. TILE ADJ. ALUM. A.B. APPROX. A.C. A.F.F. @ BLKG. BD. BOT. BLDG. CAB. C.I. C.B. CLG. CEM. C.C or O.C. CL CER. TILE C.O. C.O.T.G. CLR. RDW C.W. COL. CONC. C.P. CONST. C.H. C.J. CONT. CTR. CTSK. D.A. DTL. DIA. or Ø DIM. DW DISP. DO DR. D.S. DWG. D.F. EA. E.W. ELECT. E.W.C. EL. or ELEV. ENCL. EQ. EQUIP. (E) EX. E.J. EXP. EXT. F.O.C. F.O.M. F.O.S. FIN. F.E. F.E.C. F.H.C. F.H.M.S. F.H.W.S. FL. or FLR. F.D. FTG. FND. GALV. G.I. GA. GL. GLU-LAM GRD. GYP. BD. HDW. HT. H.C. H.M. HORIZ. H.B. HR. INSUL. INT. INV. JT ACOUSTIC TILE ADJUSTABLE ALUMINUM ANCHOR BOLT APPROXIMATELY ASPHALTIC CONCRETE ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AT BLOCKING BOARD BOTTOM BUILDING CABINET CAST IRON CATCH BASIN CEILING CEMENT CENTER TO CENTER CENTERLINE CERAMIC TILE CLEANOUT CLEANOUT TO GRADE CLEAR REDWOOD COLD WATER COLUMN CONCRETE CONCRETE PIPE CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION HEART CONSTRUCTION JOINT CONTINUOUS COUNTER COUNTER SUNK DISABLED ACCESS DETAIL DIAMETER DIMENSION DISHWASHER DISPOSAL DITTO DOOR DOWNSPOUT DRAWING DRINKING FOUNTAIN and/or DOUGLAS FIR EACH EACH WAY ELECTRIC or ELECTRICAL ELECTRIC WATER COOLER ELEVATION ENCLOSE and/or ENCLOSURE EQUAL EQUIPMENT EXISTING EXPANSION EXPANSION JOINT EXPOSED EXTERIOR FACE OF CONCRETE FACE OF MASONRY FACE OF STUD FINISH FIRE EXTINGUISHER FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET FIRE HOSE CABINET FLAT HEAD METAL SCREW FLAT HEAD WOOD SCREW FLOOR FLOOR DRAIN FOOTING FOUNDATION GALVANIZED GALVANIZED IRON GAUGE GLASS GLUE-LAMINATED GRADE GYPSUM BOARD HARDWARE HEIGHT HOLLOW CORE HOLLOW METAL HORIZONTAL HOSE BIBB HOUR INSULATION INTERIOR INVERT JOINT LAV. LAM. M.B. M.H. MFG. M.O. MATL. MAX. MECH. MTL. MIN. MISC. MTD. (N) N.I.C. N.T.S. NO. or # OBS. O.C. OPNG. OPP. O.H. O.F.O.S. O.D. O.F.C.I. PART. P.A.F. PL PLAS. PW/PLYWD. PR. P.L. d P.V.C. Q R. or RAD. R.W.L. RWD./R.W. R.C.P. REINF. REQ'D R.D. RM. R.O. RND. or Ø R.H.M.S. R.H.W.S. S.T.S.M.S. SHEATH. SHT. S.M.S. S.O.V. SIM. S.C. SPEC. SQ. or Ø S.S. STD. STL. STRUCT. TEL. T.T.B. TERR. T.&G. T.J. T.O.B. T.O.C. T.O.S. T.O.W. TYP. U.O.N. V.T.R. VERT. V.G. V.C.T. V.C.P. V.W.C. W.C. W.H. WP. W/ W/O WD. W.W.M.. LAVATORY LAMINATE MACHINE BOLT MANHOLE MANUFACTURER MASONRY OPENING MATERIAL MAXIMUM MECHANICAL METAL MINIMUM MISCELLANEOUS MOUNTED NEW NOT IN CONTRACT NOT TO SCALE NUMBER OBSCURE ON CENTER OPENING OPPOSITE OPPOSITE HAND OUTSIDE FACE OF STUD OVERFLOW DRAIN and/or OUTSIDE DIAMETER OWNER FURNISHED and CONTRACTOR INSTALLED PARTITION POWDER ACTUATED FASTENER PLATE PLASTER PLYWOOD PAIR PROPERTY LINE PENNY (NAILS) POLY VINYL CHLORIDE RADIUS RAIN WATER LEADER REDWOOD REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE REINFORCING REQUIRED ROOF DRAIN ROOM ROUGH OPENING ROUND ROUND HEAD METAL SCREW ROUND HEAD WOOD SCREW SELF TAPPING SHEET METAL SCREW SHEATHING SHEET SHEET METAL SCREW SHUT OFF VALVE SIMILAR SOLID CORE SPECIFICATIONS SQUARE STAINLESS STEEL STANDARD STEEL STRUCTURAL TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TERMINAL BOARD TERRAZZO TONGUE & GROOVE TOOLED JOINT TOP OF BEAM TOP OF CURB or CONCRETE TOP OF STEEL or SHEATHING TOP OF WALK TYPICAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED VENT THROUGH ROOF VERTICAL VERTICAL GRAIN VINYL COMPOSITION TILE VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE VINYL WALL COVERING WATER CLOSET WATER HEATER WATERPROOF WITH WITHOUT WOOD WELDED WIRE MESH FACE OF OBJECT CENTERLINE OF OBJECT SECTION NUMBER SHEET WHERE APPEARS EARTH GRAVEL / ROCK CONCRETE CONCRETE BLOCK SAND, GROUT OR PLASTER STEEL WOOD, FINISH GRADE PLY-WOOD WOOD, CONTINUOUS MEMBER WOOD, BLOCKING PLAN REF. GRID DOOR ID WINDOW ID REVISION MARKER PLAN KEY NOTES SYMBOLS REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN SHEETS AND CONSULTANT DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL SYMBOLS AND REFERENCE DESIGNATIONS DIMENSION REFERENCE SECTION REFERENCE 01 A9.1 DETAIL NUMBER SHEET WHERE APPEARS DETAIL REFERENCE 01 A9.1 SCHEDULE REFERENCE A 1 10 A 01 MATERIALS REFERENCE APPLICABLE CODES DEFERRED APPROVAL ITEMS 2016 California Building Code 2016 California Residential Building Code 2016 California Mechanical Code 2016 California Plumbing Code 2016 California Electrical Code 2016 California Energy Code 2016 Calgreen NEW TWO STORY HOUSE, 4 BEDROOMS AND 4 AND 1/2 BATHROOMS. DETACHED GARAGE. COMPLETE DEMOLITION OF EXISTING TWO STORY HOUSE. SITE LOCATION OWNER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ENERGY COMPLIANCE / GREEN RATING SURVEYOR / CIVIL ENGINEER CHRISTINA AND DAVID ZHANG 15235 Bellecourt Ave Saratoga CA 95070 MICHAEL CHAU B. ENG. LEED AP, CEPE, CGBP, GREEN POINT RATER T: (650) 989-1263 michaelchau.msj@gmail.com SOIL REPORT FOUNDATION ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. 3984 Washington Ave., #236, Fremont, CA 94538 T: (510) 371-5019 liiban99@gmail.com MISSION ENGINEERING, INC. 2355 De la Cruz Blvd Santa Clara, CA 95050 T: (408) 727-8662 LANDSCAPING SCOTT FORNACIARI ASLA LANDARC ASSOCIATES PLLC T: (408) 361-8085 WWW.LANDARCASSOCIATES.COM ARCHITECTURAL A-1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 1 SURVEY A-1.D DEMOLITION PLAN A-1.1 SITE PLAN A-1.2 FLOOR AREA DIAGRAM A-1.4 STREET-SCAPE A-2.0 FIRST FLOOR PLAN A-2.1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN A-2.2 ROOF PLAN A-3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-4.0 BUILDING SECTIONS T-1 TREE INVENTORY CIVIL C1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C2 NOTES C3 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C4 EROSION CONTROL PLAN LANDSCAPING L1.1 FRONT YARD PLANTING PLAN L2.1 IRRIGATION PLAN L2.2 HYDROZONE PLAN L2.3 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L2.4 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L2.5 PLANTING & IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS A RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 13D AND STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. SEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. FIRE SPRINKLERS WILL BE SECURED ON A SEPARATE PERMIT. Zhang Residence 15235 Bellecourt Ave. Saratoga CA 95070 New Two Story Residence Address identification. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Where required by the fire code official, address numbers shall be provided in additional approved locations to facilitate emergency response. Address numbers shall be Arabic numbers or alphabetical letters. Numbers shall be a minimum of 4 inches (101.6 mm) high with a minimum stroke width of 0.5 inch (12.7 mm). Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole or other sign or means shall be used to identify the structure. Address numbers shall be maintained. CFC Sec. 505.1 476.7 693.6 4,471.8 0 Porch is open on 3 sides 0 6,304 1,840 920 1,710 920 855 855 6,304 3,550 1,755 8,059 HEIGHT INFORMATION TABLE SEE A 3.1 FOR ELEVATION HEIGHTS Lowest Elevation Point (at the buildings edge from natural grade)98' Highest Elevation Point (at the buildings edge from natural grade)104' Average Elevation Point (based on highest and lowest points above)101' of the roof. Top most elevation point (measured from average point above) to the top most point 24'0" Based on lowest adjancent grade elevation of ___98'___ and highest of ___104'____ PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION PROJECT INFORMATION APN 510 03 013 COUNTY SANTA CLARA ZONING DISTRICT R-1 40,000 FLOOD ZONE No HISTORIC DISTRICT No OCCUPANCY R-3 + U-1 BUILDING TYPE V-B AVERAGE SLOPE 3% LOT SIZE 35,283 sq.ft. (0.81 Acres) ALLOWED FLOOR AREA 5,688 sq.ft. See Calculation Below MAX COVERAGE 35% = 12,349 sq.ft. MIN. SETBACK (First Floor)F= 30' S=20' R=50' MAXIMUM HEIGHT (PROPOSED)+- 24' 0" (27' Max Allowed) FIRST FLOOR 4,471.8 sq.ft. SECOND FLOOR 693.6 sq.ft. GARAGE 476.7 sq.ft. FLOOR AREA (sq.ft.)5,642.06 sq.ft. PROPOSED COVERAGE (sq.ft.)=6,912 sq.ft. FRONT TRELLIS (180) + REAR TRELLIS (428) HOUSE FIRST FLOOR with overhang (6,304)+ 6,912 / 35,283= 19.5% MAX F.A.R. ALLOWED : 4,050 + 78 / 1,000 ABOVE 15,000 36,000- 15,000= 21,000 (21,000 / 1,000) * 78= 1,638 1,638+ 4,050=5,688 SQ.FT. SITE AREA : 35,283 SQ.FT. (rounded at 36,000)FRONT YARD HARDSCAPE CALCULATION DRIVEWAY AREA: 705 sq.ft. OVER FRONT YARD AREA 3,744 sq.ft. = 18% SETBACKS TABLE Required Proposed Front 30'0"53'5" Left Side 20'0"20'0" Right Side 20'0"20'0" Rear 50'0"123'5" Demo Demo Demo Demo 5,642.06 1,755 PERVIOUS PAVERS PERVIOUS PAVERS Conditions 109 GARAGE DRIVEWAYPATIO B E L L E C O U R T289.08 S89°51'10"W S89°51'10"WS00°12'00"E122.86284.41 S 1°24'00"E30.76S 3°06'10"WS 3°06'10"W92.26115.260.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 92.87 98.17 100.62 100.98 100.93 101.16 101.17 101.88 102.47102.48 103.16 102.71 105.22 106.31108.01110.24 109.38 108.38 106.41 105.61 104.83 104.56 104.05 103.64 103.61 103.21 101.74 100.33 99.35 99.48 99.08 99.61 99.72 100.72 100.65 98.67 99.56 105.55 105.03 107.16 107.11 108.93 107.39 107.45 106.74 105.67 105.48 103.92 102.74 103.11 104.21 106.44 105.00 102.98 101.39 104.19 99.99 100.58 100.47101.22 101.41 101.34 101.16 101.17 100.79 100.76 101.37 100.71 100.87 101.00 100.88 101.27 101.26 101.28 102.41 102.36 101.27 101.34 102.08 102.83 102.81 103.04 104.02 104.64 104.68 103.57 102.17 101.23 100.82 100.06 101.21 98.41 103.05 103.46104.24 104.55104.60 104.61 103.72 102.75 101.55 98.42 99.17 102.46 102.64 110.84 97.44 97.4797.46 97.6397.6898.09 97.85 97.74 99.49 98.42 98.04 97.45 97.55 97.44 97.77 98.06 98.20 98.59 99.4599.81 99.85 99.08 98.56 98.04 98.34 97.87 98.49 98.41 98.24 97.46 96.78 95.80 94.90 94.16 93.39 93.5594.04 94.07 94.06 95.65 96.26 96.8997.17 98.47 98.50 98.44 99.04 99.02 98.07 98.56 100.62 92.86 98.66 96.25 95.35 95.13 94.94 95.36 96.22 96.76 96.68 97.67 99.41 97.38 96.20 96.49 97.10 97.68 98.27 98.19 96.62 96.79 96.72 91.95 91.69 91.53 95.09 95.35 95.94 98.46 97.95 100.00 97.05 99.08 99.2199.29 101.25 101.31 102.83 100.70 100.57 100.63 100.72100.86 100.85 100.61 100.91 98.65 99.63 99.86 100.56101.56 100.98 100.81 101.04 102.32102.28 102.36 102.10 101.30 103.36 10 8 10 6 10 4 10 2 92 9 4 96 9 8 100 9 8 1 0 0 PATIOPLANTERPATIOTRASH ENCLODRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY LAWN LAWN PLAY AREA KENNEL PATH PATH FENCE FENCE FENCEFENCE FENCE CLUMPCLUMP (2)14"OAK 4"OAK 4"RWD 14"OAK 4"OAK 4"OAK10"OAK12"OAK 6"OAK 30"OAK 10"OAK 20"OAK 14"OAK (2)8"OAK 6"OAK 12"OAK 10"TREE 18"BAY 18"TREE (4)8"BAY 40"TREE SSCO (2)SSCO FF= 6"TREE SSCO SSCO JP JP SSMHSSSSSSSS SSSSOHW OHW OHW OHWOHWOHW8"OAK 16"OAK 6' TPZ RADIUS 10' TPZ RADIUS 11' TPZ RADIUS 6' TPZ RADIUS 10' TPZ RADIUS 132 133134 135 136 137 138 139140 142 141 165 158 159 162 164 166 167 168 169 170 171 160 161 163 157 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 149 148 147 146 145 144 143 18"OAK Prior to any grading, scraping or trenching within / under the canopy of a protected tree, the project arborist shall be retained to provide supervision and recommendations to minimize possible damage to the tree. The proposed trenching shall be approved by the City of Saratoga Planning Department prior to commencing digging. The project retained arborist is: Rick Gessner, (831) 331-8982 DEMOLITION PLAN Scale: 3/32" = 1'-0"1 0 4 128 16 TREE TO BE REMOVED, SEE ARBORIST REPORT NOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED, SEE ARBORIST REPORT NOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED, SEE ARBORIST REPORT NOTES SEE ARBORIST REPORT FOR TREES PROTECTION AND TREES TO BE REMOVED NO CHANGES TO EXISTING LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION SYSTEM TREE TO BE REMOVED, SEE ARBORIST REPORT NOTES GARAGE DRIVEWAY GASPATIOELECB E L L E C O U R T289.08 S89°51'10"W S89°51'10"WS00°12'00"E122.86284.41 S 1°24'00"E30.76S 3°06'10"W92.260.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.17 100.62 100.98 100.93 101.16 101.17 101.88 102.47102.48 103.16 102.71 105.22 106.31108.01110.24 109.38 108.38 106.41 104.83 104.56 104.05 103.64 103.61 103.21 101.74 100.33 99.35 99.48 99.08 99.61 99.72 100.72 100.65 98.67 99.56 105.55 105.03 107.16 107.11 108.93 107.39 107.45 106.74 105.67 105.48 103.92 102.74 101.70 103.11 104.21 106.44 105.00 102.98 101.39 104.19 99.99 100.59 100.58 100.47101.22 101.46 101.41 101.34 101.16 101.17 100.79 100.76 101.39 101.28 101.35 101.37 100.71 100.87 101.00 100.88 101.27 101.26 101.28 102.41 102.36 101.27 101.34 102.08 102.83 102.81 103.04 104.02 104.64 104.68 103.57 102.17 101.23 100.82 100.06 101.21 98.41 103.05 103.46104.24 104.55104.60 104.61 103.72 102.75 101.55 98.42 99.17 102.99 102.46 102.96 102.64107.96 110.84 97.44 97.4797.46 97.6397.6898.09 97.85 97.74 99.49 98.42 98.04 97.45 97.55 97.44 97.77 98.06 98.20 98.59 99.4599.81 99.85 99.08 98.56 98.04 98.34 97.87 98.49 98.41 98.24 97.46 96.78 95.80 94.90 94.16 93.39 93.5594.04 94.07 94.06 95.65 96.26 96.8997.17 98.47 98.50 98.44 99.04 99.02 98.07 98.56 100.62 96.25 95.35 95.13 94.94 95.36 96.22 96.76 96.68 97.67 99.41 97.38 96.20 96.49 97.10 97.68 98.27 98.19 96.62 96.79 91.95 95.35 95.94 97.05 99.08 99.2199.29 101.25 101.31 102.83 100.70 100.57 100.63 100.72100.86 100.85 100.61 100.91 98.65 99.63 99.86 100.56101.56 100.98 100.81 101.04 102.32102.28 102.36 102.10 101.30 103.36 10 8 10 6 10 4 10 2 92 9 4 96 9 8 100 9 8 1 0 0 PATIOPLANTERPATIOTRASH ENCLOB U I L D I N G DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY LAWN LAWN PLAY AREA KENNEL PATH PATH FENCE FENCE FENCEFENCE FENCE CLUMPCLUMP (2)14"OAK 4"OAK 4"RWD 14"OAK 4"OAK 4"OAK10"OAK12"OAK 6"OAK 30"OAK 10"OAK 20"OAK 14"OAK (2)8"OAK 6"OAK 12"OAK 10"TREE 18"BAY 18"TREE (4)8"BAY 40"TREE SSCO (2)SSCO FF= 6"TREE SSCO SSCO JP JP OHW OHW OHW OHWOHWOHW8"OAK NOTE: ALL STRUCTURES (MAIN HOUSE AND GARAGE) TO BE REMOVED. REMOVE EXISTING WALKWAY REMOVE EXISTING PLANTERS REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL, UNPUBLISHED WORK OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE Davide Giannella Sheet Scale : AS NOTEDDrawn By DG11/27/2017Reviewed By DGZhang Residence15235 Bellecourt Ave. Saratoga CA234601644 N. Santa Cruz Ave. Suite 6 Los Gatos, California 95030 T. 408-219-0601 dg@acadia-architecture.com A 1 D DEMOLITION PLANRevisionRevisionRevisionacadiaarchitecture 12-31-19 110 GARAGE DRIVEWAYPATIO B E L L E C O U R T289.08 S89°51'10"W S89°51'10"WS00°12'00"E122.86284.41 S 1°24'00"E30.76S 3°06'10"WS 3°06'10"W92.26115.260.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 92.87 98.17 100.62 100.98 100.93 101.16 101.17 101.88 102.47102.48 103.16 102.71 105.22 106.31108.01110.24 109.38 108.38 106.41 105.61 104.83 104.56 104.05 103.64 103.61 103.21 101.74 100.33 99.35 99.48 99.08 99.61 99.72 100.72 100.65 98.67 99.56 105.55 105.03 107.16 107.11 108.93 107.39 107.45 106.74 105.67 105.48 103.92 102.74 103.11 104.21 106.44 105.00 102.98 101.39 104.19 99.99 100.58 100.47101.22 101.41 101.34 101.16 101.17 100.79 100.76 101.37 100.71 100.87 101.00 100.88 101.27 101.26 101.28 102.41 102.36 101.27 101.34 102.08 102.83 102.81 103.04 104.02 104.64 104.68 103.57 102.17 101.23 100.82 100.06 101.21 98.41 103.05 103.46104.24 104.55104.60 104.61 103.72 102.75 101.55 98.42 99.17 102.46 102.64 110.84 97.44 97.4797.46 97.6397.6898.09 97.85 97.74 99.49 98.42 98.04 97.45 97.55 97.44 97.77 98.06 98.20 98.59 99.4599.81 99.85 99.08 98.56 98.04 98.34 97.87 98.49 98.41 98.24 97.46 96.78 95.80 94.90 94.16 93.39 93.5594.04 94.07 94.06 95.65 96.26 96.8997.17 98.47 98.50 98.44 99.04 99.02 98.07 98.56 100.62 92.86 98.66 96.25 95.35 95.13 94.94 95.36 96.22 96.76 96.68 97.67 99.41 97.38 96.20 96.49 97.10 97.68 98.27 98.19 96.62 96.79 96.72 91.95 91.69 91.53 95.09 95.35 95.94 98.46 97.95 100.00 97.05 99.08 99.2199.29 101.25 101.31 102.83 100.70 100.57 100.63 100.72100.86 100.85 100.61 100.91 98.65 99.63 99.86 100.56101.56 100.98 100.81 101.04 102.32102.28 102.36 102.10 101.30 103.36PATIOPLANTERPATIO TRASH ENCLODRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY LAWN LAWN PLAY AREA KENNEL PATH PATH FENCE FENCE FENCEFENCE FENCE CLUMPCLUMP (2)14"OAK 4"OAK 4"RWD 14"OAK 4"OAK 4"OAK10"OAK12"OAK 6"OAK 30"OAK 10"OAK 20"OAK 14"OAK (2)8"OAK 6"OAK 12"OAK 10"TREE 18"BAY 18"TREE (4)8"BAY 40"TREE SSCO (2)SSCO FF= 6"TREE SSCO SSCO JP JP SSMHSSSSSSSS SSSSOHW OHW OHW OHWOHWOHW8"OAK 16"OAK 6' TPZ RADIUS 10' TPZ RADIUS 11' TPZ RADIUS 6' TPZ RADIUS 10' TPZ RADIUS 132 133134 135 136 137 138 139140 142 141 165 158 159 162 164 166 167 168 169 170 171 160 161 163 157 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 149 148 147 146 145 144 143 18"OAK B E L L E C O U R T95.80 95.35 99.41 4"RWD GARAGEFAMILY ROOM LAUNDRY KITCHEN STORAGE NOOK DINING ROOM SITTING ROOM MASTER BEDROOM MASTER BATHROOM GAME ROOM BEDROOOM POWDER ROOMBATHROOM 1 Walk In Shower Tub OUTDOOR \KITCHENWATER FEATURE pool table MASTER CLOSET Ref.F.P. OFFICE LIVING ROOM FOYER 5:00 PM San Jose March 20N20'-0"REQ. SET BACK50'-0"REQ. SET BACK 30'-0"REQ. SET BACK31'-3"SET BACK21'-9"SET BACK123'-5"SET BACK 20'-0"SET BACK20'-0"SET BACK53'-5"SET BACK 20'-0"SET BACK86'-0"SET BACK36'-8"SET BACKPERCOLATING PAVERS TURF PAVERS DRIVEWAY IPE WOOD DECK EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREA NOTE: ALL STRUCTURES (MAIN HOUSE AND GARAGE) TO BE REMOVED. Prior to any grading, scraping or trenching within / under the canopy of a protected tree, the project arborist shall be retained to provide supervision and recommendations to minimize possible damage to the tree. The proposed trenching shall be approved by the City of Saratoga Planning Department prior to commencing digging. The project retained arborist is: Rick Gessner, (831) 331-8982 A non-removable backflow prevention device shall be installed on all exterior hose bibs. CPC 603.5.7 SITE PLAN Scale: 3/32" = 1'-0"1 0 4 128 16 NEW DRIVEWAY PERCOLATING PAVERS WALK PERCOLATING PAVERS WALK NEW DRIVEWAY, REPLACING EXISTING ONE WITH SAME SHAPE, PERCOLATING PAVERS PORCH STRUCTURE TREE TO BE REMOVED, SEE ARBORIST REPORT NOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED, SEE ARBORIST REPORT NOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED, SEE ARBORIST REPORT NOTES 5' H WALL FENCE 5' H WALL FENCE 6' H WOOD FENCE 6' H WOOD FENCE DRAINAGE NOTES 1- ALL DOWNSPOUTS AND FOUNDATION PERIMETER DRAINS TO BE CONNECTED TO SPLASH BLOCKS AWAY FROM BUILDING 2- SURFACE DRAINAGE TO FLOW THROUGH GRASS SWALES 3-NOT USED 4-SLOPE GRADE AWAY FROM BUILDING 5% FOR A DISTANCE OF 10' AWAY FROM BUILDING. PROVIDE 2% SLOPE ON IMPERVIOUS SURFACES 5- ENSURE PROPER LOT DRAINAGE PER CHAPTER 11 CPC 2016 FOR LOCATION OF CATCH BASINS TO THE PROPERTY LINES. 6-THE RUNOFF SHOULD REMAIN ON THE PROPERTY NOT BE TAKEN TO A PUBLIC WAY. SEE ARBORIST REPORT FOR TREES PROTECTION AND TREES TO BE REMOVED F.F. 102 REMOVE EXISTING WALKWAY TREE TO BE REMOVED, SEE ARBORIST REPORT NOTES FRONT YARD HARDSCAPE CALCULATION DRIVEWAY AREA: 705 sq.ft. OVER FRONT YARD AREA 3,744 sq.ft. = 18% TREE PROTECTION FENCING, SEE ARBORIST REPORT All TPZ radii are based on six times the trunk diameter distance on one side of a tree per arborist recommendations on his report. 161 TREE NUMBERING LABELS SEE "SHEET T.1 TREE INVENTORY" FOR LEGEND ON SPECIES AND SIZES GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS NEW GAS METER NEW 400 AMP ELECTRICAL METER ELECTRICAL UTILITIES TO BE UNDERGROUND. SEE ARBORIST RECOMMENDATIONS WHEN WORKING NEAR TREE PROTECTED ZONES ELECTRICAL SANIT A R Y SEWE R WATER NEW WATER LINE, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS INDICATES TREE TO BE REMOVED SEE "SHEET T.1 TREE INVENTORY" FOR LEGEND ON SPECIES AND SIZES AND ARBORIST REPORT RETAINING WALL SEE CIVIL PLANS TREE TO BE REMOVED, SEE ARBORIST REPORT NOTES RETAINING WALL SEE CIVIL PLANS ALL ITEMS DASHED ARE TO BE REMOVED, TYP. ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL, UNPUBLISHED WORK OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE Davide Giannella Sheet Scale : AS NOTEDDrawn By DG2/19/2018Reviewed By DGZhang Residence15235 Bellecourt Ave. Saratoga CA234601644 N. Santa Cruz Ave. Suite 6 Los Gatos, California 95030 T. 408-219-0601 dg@acadia-architecture.com A 1.1 SITE PLANRevisionRevisionRevisionacadiaarchitecture 12-31-19 111 99.41 GARAGEFAMILY ROOM LAUNDRY KITCHEN STORAGE NOOK DINING ROOM SITTING ROOM MASTER BEDROOM MASTER BATHROOM GAME ROOM BEDROOOM POWDER ROOMBATHROOM 1 Walk In Shower Tub OUTDOOR \KITCHENWATER FEATURE MASTER CLOSET F.P. OFFICE LIVING ROOM FOYER FIRST FLOOR PLAN- AREA DIAGRAM Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 0 4 128 165'-4 1/2"21'-6 1/2"23'-5"27'-11" 05 04 4'-0"38'-7"1'-5"6'-2"08 14 18 14'-5"15'-6"4'-0"14'-8"13'-9 1/2"26'-1" 21'-11 1/2" 18'-11"18'-1 1/2"15'-5 1/2"19'-11 1/2"9'-2 1/2"4'-5 1/2"13'-9"11'-11"19'-0"22'-0"16'-8"139'-3"6'-8 1/2"5'-9"5'-9"22'-5 1/2"29'-0" 13'-1 1/2"25'-4 1/2"21'-10"21'-10" 02 03 06 07 1009 11 12 15 16 17 01 11'-5" 19'-0" BATHROOM 1 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 2 BATHROOM 2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN- AREA DIAGRAM Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 19 24'-10"27'-11" FLOOR AREA CALCULATION SECTION # (SHAPE)SIDE A SIDE B FLOOR AREA OF SECTION FOOTPRINT 01- RECTANGLE 21'-10"21'- 10"476.69 sq.ft. TOTAL GARAGE 476.69 sq.ft. 02- RECTANGLE 18'-1 1/2"18'-11"342.78 sq.ft. 03- RECTANGLE 5'-5 1/2"19'-11 1/2"308.67 sq.ft. 04- RECTANGLE 1'-5"9'-2 1/2"13.28 sq.ft. 05- RECTANGLE 5'-4 1/2"21'-6 1/2"115.81 sq.ft. 06- RECTANGLE 22'-5 1/2"29'-0"650.94 sq.ft. 07- RECTANGLE 4'-0"38'-7"154 sq.ft. 08- RECTANGLE 23'-5"27'-11"653.15 sq.ft. 09- RECTANGLE 9'-3"13'-9"127.29 sq.ft. 10- RECTANGLE 4'-5 1/2"11'-11"52.8 sq.ft. 11- RECTANGLE 14'-5"15'-6"224 sq.ft. 12- RECTANGLE 5'-9"11'-5"65.64 sq.ft. 13- RECTANGLE 5'-9"13'-1 1/2"75.41 sq.ft. 14- RECTANGLE 14'-8"26'-1"382 sq.ft. 15- RECTANGLE 22'-0"25'-4 1/2"558.42 sq.ft. 16- RECTANGLE 6'-8 1/2"19'-0"127.61 sq.ft. 17- RECTANGLE 16'-8"19'-0"316.67 sq.ft. 18- RECTANGLE 13'-9 1/2"21'-11 1/2"303.28 sq.ft. TOTAL 1ST FLOOR 4,471.75 sq.ft. 19- RECTANGLE 24'-10"27'- 11"693.62 sq.ft. TOTAL 2ND FLOOR 693.62 sq.ft. TOTAL FLOOR AREA 5,642.06 sq.ft. ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL, UNPUBLISHED WORK OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE Davide Giannella Sheet Scale : AS NOTEDDrawn By DG11/27/2017Reviewed By DGZhang Residence15235 Bellecourt Ave. Saratoga CA234601644 N. Santa Cruz Ave. Suite 6 Los Gatos, California 95030 T. 408-219-0601 dg@acadia-architecture.com A 1.2 AREA DIAGRAMSRevisionRevisionRevisionacadiaarchitecture 12-31-19 112 BELLECOURT AVE. Scale: 3/32" = 1'-0"1 20'-0"PROPERTY LINE+- 24'-0"MAX HEIGHTPROPERTY LINE15235 BELLECOURT AVE. WOOD SIDING STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, TYP. SHINGLES, TYP. AT UPPER ROOF, TYP. 20'-0"+- 25'-2"MAX HEIGHT+- 20'-3"MAX HEIGHTGARAGE GARAGE 15211 BELLECOURT AVE.15261 BELLECOURT AVE. ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL, UNPUBLISHED WORK OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE Davide Giannella Sheet Scale : AS NOTEDDrawn By DG11/27/2017Reviewed By DGZhang Residence15235 Bellecourt Ave. Saratoga CA234601644 N. Santa Cruz Ave. Suite 6 Los Gatos, California 95030 T. 408-219-0601 dg@acadia-architecture.com A 1.4 STREET SCAPERevisionRevisionRevisionacadiaarchitecture 12-31-19 113 99.41 GARAGEFAMILY ROOM LAUNDRY KITCHEN STORAGE NOOK DINING ROOM SITTING ROOM MASTER BEDROOM MASTER BATHROOM GAME ROOM BEDROOOM POWDER ROOMBATHROOM 1 Walk In Shower Tub OUTDOOR \KITCHENWATER FEATURE MASTER CLOSET Ref.F.P. OFFICE LIVING ROOM FOYER 1ST FLOOR PLAN Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 0 4 128 166'-8"21'-6 1/2" 12'-4 1/2"9'-2" 6'-4 1/2" 27'-11"12'-3"4'-0 1/2"1'-4"5'-4 1/2"23'-5"28'-9 1/2"2'-8 1/2"4'-0 1/2" 5'-5" 1'-11 1/2" 12'-2 1/2"2'-9"12'-4 1/2"13'-4 1/2"14'-3"1'-8"8'-0"26'-11 1/2"1'-11 1/2"4'-2 1/2"14'-5"14'-7"2'-9"26'-3"12'-5" 8'-0"2'-0 1/2"13'-6"4'-1 1/2"4'-3"3'-4 1/2"15'-5 1/2"18'-11" 4'-4 1/2"18'-1 1/2"3'-7"2'-10 1/2"1'-8"17'-0"18'-4"1'-10"1'-8 1/2"3'-6"3'-6"6'-11"8'-0"9'-2"5'-8 1/2" 4'-2 1/2" 10'-1 1/2" 5'-4 1/2"4'-3 1/2"6'-8"2'-10 1/2"10'-8"7'-0"2'-4"7'-4 1/2"4'-4 1/2"4'-10 1/2"15'-9 1/2" 1'-10"2'-11"10'-11 1/2"10'-9"5'-4 1/2"22'-5 1/2"9'-3"5'-9"25'-4 1/2"5'-1"4'-8" 21'-6"2'-0"2'-7"17'-0" 6'-9 1/2" 10'-10"16'-5"24'-2 1/2"1'-10 1/2" 2'-4"4'-1"9'-0" 22'-0"7'-11 1/2"19'-0"21'-11 1/2"21'-3"21'-5"2'-1"21'-0"5'-5"6'-9"6'-1"5'-11"10'-5 1/2"10'-6 1/2"10'-6 1/2" 2 A 4.0 1 A 4.0 3 A 4.0 LINE OF CLERESTORY ABOVE LINE OF CLERESTORY ABOVE LINE OF CLERESTORY ABOVE LINE OF CLERESTORY ABOVE LINE OF CLERESTORY ABOVE LINE OF CLERESTORY ABOVE ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL, UNPUBLISHED WORK OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE Davide Giannella Sheet Scale : AS NOTEDDrawn By DG11/27/2017Reviewed By DGZhang Residence15235 Bellecourt Ave. Saratoga CA234601644 N. Santa Cruz Ave. Suite 6 Los Gatos, California 95030 T. 408-219-0601 dg@acadia-architecture.com A 2.0 FIRST FLOOR PLANRevisionRevisionRevisionacadiaarchitecture 12-31-19 114 BATHROOM 1 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 2 BATHROOM 2 GRAPHIC KEY: EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN NEW FRAMED EXTERIOR / INTERIOR WALL S.S.D. FIRE RESISTIVE WALL CONSTRUCTION AT WALLS BETWEEN GARAGE AND LIVABLE SPACE: MIN. 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD TYPE X OVER STUDS FROM CURB TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATING APPLIED TO INTERIOR SIDE OF THE EXTERIOR WALLS 2ND FLOOR PLAN Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 0 4 128 16 24'-10"27'-11"4'-6 1/2" 10'-3 1/2"17'-7 1/2"12'-9"12'-1"15'-6 1/2"4'-5"6'-9" 2'-1"24'-8 1/2"12'-6"14'-8 1/2"2'-1"8'-4"5'-4 1/2"4'-2"7'-1 1/2"1'-10 1/2"4'-9"15'-3"2'-4 1/2"6'-4 1/2"3'-11" 2'-0 1/2"8'-0"3'-11"3'-6"1'-7" 4'-2"4'-3 1/2"3'-9"23'-9 1/2"3'-6 1/2"4'-1"2'-2"2'-7 1/2"2'-4 1/2"5'-4 1/2"6'-4 1/2"2'-5"2'-4 1/2" 2'-6" 22'-11"5'-0" 27'-11"3'-0 1/2"7'-3"6'-11 1/2"3'-4"2'-0 1/2"3'-9 1/2"7'-6 1/2"7'-11"7'-11"EQ.27'-1 1/2"5'-7 1/2"6'-9"14'-8"5'-2 1/2" 1'-6" 10'-10"5'-4 1/2"12'-2"9'-11"11'-3"1'-9 1/2"1'-7 1/2"1'-4 1/2"2'-6"1'-11 1/2"1'-11 1/2"CLERESTORY CLERESTORY 1'-4 1/2" 2 A 4.0 1 A 4.0 3 A 4.0 OPEN TO BELOW 15'-0" CEILING HEIGHT 1'-5" 1'-5"EQ.1'-5"1'-4 1/2"ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL, UNPUBLISHED WORK OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE Davide Giannella Sheet Scale : AS NOTEDDrawn By DG11/27/2017Reviewed By DGZhang Residence15235 Bellecourt Ave. Saratoga CA234601644 N. Santa Cruz Ave. Suite 6 Los Gatos, California 95030 T. 408-219-0601 dg@acadia-architecture.com A 2.1 SECOND FLOOR PLANRevisionRevisionRevisionacadiaarchitecture 12-31-19 115 ROOF VENTILATION NOTES: 1. ENCLOSED ATTICS AND ENCLOSED RAFTER SPACES FORMED WHERE CEILINGS ARE APPLIED DIRECTLY TO THE UNDERSIDE OF ROOF RAFTERS SHALL HAVE CROSS VENTILATION FOR EACH SEPARATE SPACE BY VENTILATING OPENINGS AGAINST THE ENTRANCE THE RAIN. VENTILATING OPENINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH CORROSION-RESISTANT WIRE MESH, WITH THE LAST DIMENSION BEING 1/8". 2. THE NET FREE VENTILATING AREA SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1/300 OF THE AREA OF THE SPACE VENTILATED WITH 50% OF THE REQUIRED VENTILATING AREA PROVIDED BY VENTILATORS LOCATED IN THE UPPER PORTION OF THE SPACE TO BE VENTILATED AT LEAST 3 FEET ABOVE EAVE OR CORNICE VENTS WITH THE BALANCE OF THE REQUIRED VENTILATION PROVIDED BY EAVE OR CORNICE VENTS . 3. WHERE EAVE OR CORNICE VENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSULATION SHALL NOT BLOCK THE FREE FLOW OF AIR. A MINMUM OF 1-INCH SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE INSULATION AND THE ROOF SHEATHING AT THE LOCATION OF THE VENT. ROOF DRAINAGE NOTES: 1) Roof drains shall be equipped with strainers extending at 4" above the roof deck surface and be at least 1-1/2 times larger than the drainpipe. (CPC 1105.2) 2)Where roof surfaces are not designed to drain over roof edges, overflow drains or scuppers three times the size of required roof drains shall be provided. Said drains to be located 2" above the low point of the roof. Overflow drains to be independent of and in addition to surface drains. CBC 1506.3 3)Roof drainage water shall not be allowed to flow over public property CBC 1506.5 4) Provide splashblocks at each downspout GRAPHIC KEY: 3" DIA. 26 GA DOWNSPOUTDS 5" .032 inch THICK ALUMINUM GUTTER WITH LEAF GUARDS 4" D OVERFLOW DRAINOF DR 2" D DRAIN SC THROUGH-WALL SCUPPER ROOF VENTILATOR/ INTAKE VENT STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING FLAT EYEBROW ROOF VENT SKYLIGHTS NOTE PLUMBING VENTS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 10' AWAY FROM, OR AT LEAST 3' ABOVE ANY OPERABLE SKYLIGHTS PER CPC 906.2 SKYLIGHTS MIN. ENERGY PERFORMANCE: (U= 0.45, SHGC=0.4 MAX PER T24) VAPOR BARRIER NOTE PROVIDE CLASS 1 OR CLASS 2 VAPOR BARRIER INSTALLED ON THE WARM-IN-WINTER SIDE OF THE CEILING OR PROVIDE VENTILATORS LOCATED IN THE UPPER PORTION OF THE SPACE TO BE VENTILATED AT LEAST 3 FEET ABOVE EAVE OR CORNICE VENTS WITH THE BALANCE OF THE REQUIRED VENTILATION PROVIDED BY EAVE OR CORNICE VENTS PER CRC R806.2 ROOF PLAN Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 2:12 2:12 2:122:122:12 3:122:122:122:122:122:122:122:12 2:12 2:122:122:12 2:122:122:12 2:12 TRELLIS TRELLIS TRELLIS 2 A 4.0 3:123:123:123:12 3:12 3:12 3:12 3:123:123:123:12 2:12 SHINGLES, TYP. AT UPPER ROOF SHINGLES, TYP. AT UPPER ROOF SHINGLES, TYP. AT UPPER ROOF SHINGLES, TYP. AT UPPER ROOF STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, TYP. SHINGLES SCUPPER SHINGLES ROOFING 3 A 4.0 2:12 3:122: 1 2 M i n . POTENTIAL LOCATION FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS POTENTIAL LOCATION FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, TYP. 1 A 4.0 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, TYP. ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL, UNPUBLISHED WORK OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE Davide Giannella Sheet Scale : AS NOTEDDrawn By DG11/27/2017Reviewed By DGZhang Residence15235 Bellecourt Ave. Saratoga CA234601644 N. Santa Cruz Ave. Suite 6 Los Gatos, California 95030 T. 408-219-0601 dg@acadia-architecture.com A 2.2 ROOF PLANRevisionRevisionRevisionacadiaarchitecture 12-31-19 116 SOUTH ELEVATION Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 12 3 12 3 12 2 12 312 2 12 3 12 3 12 3 SMOOTH ACRYLIC STUCCO, TYP. SMOOTH ACRYLIC STUCCO, TYP. SMOOTH ACRYLIC STUCCO, TYP. SMOOTH ACRYLIC STUCCO, TYP.STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, TYP. WOOD SIDING STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, TYP. MONITOR CLERESTORY WINDOWS SHINGLES, TYP. AT UPPER ROOF, TYP. SHINGLES, TYP. AT UPPER ROOF, TYP. OPEN BREEZEWAY FIRST FLOOR FINISH FLOOR 102' FIRST FLOOR T.O.P. A.F.F. +10'-0"+- 24'-0"MAX HEIGHTAVERAGE GRADE 101' CLERESTORY CEILING +15'-0" AVERAGE GRADE 101' SECOND FLOOR T.O.P. A.F.F. +9'-0" SHINGLES ROOFING AT GARAGE NORTH ELEVATION Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 12 3 WOOD SIDING WOOD SIDING WOOD SIDING WOOD SIDING WOOD SIDING 12 3 12 3 12 3 12 212 2 GARAGE STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, TYP. SMOOTH ACRYLIC STUCCO, TYP. SMOOTH ACRYLIC STUCCO, TYP. SMOOTH ACRYLIC STUCCO, TYP. 12 2 SHINGLES, TYP. AT UPPER ROOF SHINGLES, TYP. AT UPPER ROOF FIRST FLOOR FINISH FLOOR 102' FIRST FLOOR T.O.P. A.F.F. +10'-0" AVERAGE GRADE 101' CLERESTORY CEILING +15'-0" SECOND FLOOR T.O.P. A.F.F. +9'-0" ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL, UNPUBLISHED WORK OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE Davide Giannella Sheet Scale : AS NOTEDDrawn By DG11/27/2017Reviewed By DGZhang Residence15235 Bellecourt Ave. Saratoga CA234601644 N. Santa Cruz Ave. Suite 6 Los Gatos, California 95030 T. 408-219-0601 dg@acadia-architecture.com A 3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSRevisionRevisionRevisionacadiaarchitecture 12-31-19 117 SIDE EAST ELEVATION Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 12 3 12 3 12 312 3 12 212 2 WOOD SIDING STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, TYP. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, TYP. WOOD SIDING WOOD SIDING SMOOTH ACRYLIC STUCCO, TYP. SMOOTH ACRYLIC STUCCO, TYP. MONITOR CLERESTORY WINDOWS MONITOR CLERESTORY WINDOWS SHINGLES, TYP. AT UPPER ROOF, TYP. SHINGLES, TYP. AT UPPER ROOF, TYP.+- 24'-0"MAX HEIGHTFIRST FLOOR FINISH FLOOR 102' FIRST FLOOR T.O.P. A.F.F. +10'-0" AVERAGE GRADE 101' CLERESTORY CEILING +15'-0" SECOND FLOOR T.O.P. A.F.F. +9'-0" TYPICAL FENC WALL ELEVATION Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 12 3 12 3 12 2 12 2 12 3 12 3 P.L. WOOD SIDING WOOD SIDING WOOD SIDING STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, TYP. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, TYP. TRELLIS IN FRONT OF GARAGE SMOOTH ACRYLIC STUCCO, TYP. SMOOTH ACRYLIC STUCCO, TYP. SHINGLES, TYP. AT UPPER ROOF, TYP. SHINGLES, TYP. AT UPPER ROOF, TYP. 12 2 FIRST FLOOR FINISH FLOOR 102' FIRST FLOOR T.O.P. A.F.F. +10'-0"+- 24'-0"MAX HEIGHTAVERAGE GRADE 101' CLERESTORY CEILING +15'-0" WOOD SCREEN AT PORCH WOOD SIDING AT GARAGE DOOR SECOND FLOOR T.O.P. A.F.F. +9'-0" PLAYROOM FINISH FLOOR 99.5' SECOND FLOOR F.F. A.F.F. +12'-6" AVERAGE GRADE 101'18'-0"27'-0"STUCCO WALL ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL BE ARABIC NUMBERS OR ALPHABETICAL LETTERS. NUMBERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES (101.6 MM) HIGH WITH A MINIMUM STROKE WIDTH OF 0.5 INCH (12.7 MM) 1 5 2 3 5 STUCCO WALL WITH TRAVERTINE CAP5'-0"4'-0" WOOD AND METAL GATE 11'-1 1/2" TYP. 1" TRAVERTINE CAP TYPICAL FENCE WALL ELEVATION Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL, UNPUBLISHED WORK OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE Davide Giannella Sheet Scale : AS NOTEDDrawn By DG6/18/2018Reviewed By DGZhang Residence15235 Bellecourt Ave. Saratoga CA234601644 N. Santa Cruz Ave. Suite 6 Los Gatos, California 95030 T. 408-219-0601 dg@acadia-architecture.com A 3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSRevisionRevisionRevisionacadiaarchitecture 12-31-19 118 SECTION B Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 12 2 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, TYP. 12 3 12 3 12 2 12 3 SMOOTH ACRYLIC STUCCO, TYP. STAIRS STAIRS MONITOR CLERESTORY WINDOWS 12 3 12 2 12 2 TRELLIS OVER HANG TRELLIS OVER HANG 15'-0" AT CLERESTORY LEVEL, TYP.FIRST FLOOR FINISH FLOOR 102' FIRST FLOOR T.O.P. A.F.F. +10'-0" AVERAGE GRADE 101' CLERESTORY CEILING +15'-0" AVERAGE GRADE 101' SECOND FLOOR T.O.P. A.F.F. +9'-0" SHINGLE ROOFING AT UPPER LEVEL SECOND FLOOR T.O.P. A.F.F. +8'-0"+- 24'-0"MAX HEIGHTSECTION A Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 12 312 3 12 3 12 3 12 3 WOOD SIDING STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, TYP. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, TYP. SMOOTH ACRYLIC STUCCO, TYP. MONITOR CLERESTORY WINDOWS BEDROOM 1 BEDROOMGAME ROOM BEDROOM 2 COAT CLOSETLIVING ROOMLAUNDRY 9'-0"2'-6"FIRST FLOOR FINISH FLOOR 102' FIRST FLOOR T.O.P. A.F.F. +10'-0" AVERAGE GRADE 101' CLERESTORY CEILING +15'-0" AVERAGE GRADE 101' SECOND FLOOR T.O.P. A.F.F. +9'-0" PLAYROOM FINISH FLOOR 99.5' SECOND FLOOR F.F. A.F.F. +12'-6" SECTION C Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 +- 24'-0"MAX HEIGHTSTAIRS BEDROOM 2 12 3 12 3 2'-6"OFFICE 12 2 MASTER CLOSET TRELLIS 12 2 2'-6"GAME ROOM 11'-6 1/2"FIRST FLOOR FINISH FLOOR 102' FIRST FLOOR T.O.P. A.F.F. +10'-0" AVERAGE GRADE 101' SECOND FLOOR T.O.P. A.F.F. +9'-0" AVERAGE GRADE 101' PLAYROOM FINISH FLOOR 99.5' SECOND FLOOR F.F. A.F.F. +12'-6" ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL, UNPUBLISHED WORK OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE Davide Giannella Sheet Scale : AS NOTEDDrawn By DG11/27/2017Reviewed By DGZhang Residence15235 Bellecourt Ave. Saratoga CA234601644 N. Santa Cruz Ave. Suite 6 Los Gatos, California 95030 T. 408-219-0601 dg@acadia-architecture.com A 4.0 BUILDING SECTIONSRevisionRevisionRevisionacadiaarchitecture 12-31-19 119 ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL, UNPUBLISHED WORK OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ACADIA-ARCHITECTURE Davide Giannella Sheet Scale : AS NOTEDDrawn By DG02/19/2018Reviewed By DGZhang Residence15235 Bellecourt Ave. Saratoga CA234601644 N. Santa Cruz Ave. Suite 6 Los Gatos, California 95030 T. 408-219-0601 dg@acadia-architecture.com T-1 TREE INVENTORYRevisionRevisionRevisionacadiaarchitecture 12-31-19 15235 Bellacourt Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection August 11, 2017 Appendix B: Tree Inventory and Assessment Tables B1: Inventory, Assessment, Disposition *Denotes Located on adjacent site Table 1: Tree inventory and Assessment Species Number Trunk Diameter (in.) Height (ft.) Canopy Diameter (ft.) Condition Suitability Impact coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) 132 12 40 15 Good Good High coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 133 8 25 20 Fair Good Low coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 134 22 55 45 Fair Good Low bay laurel (Umbellularia californica) 135 6, 8 45 40 Fair Fair Low coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 136 12 55 35 Fair Good Low coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 137 10 45 35 Fair Good Low coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 138 20 55 45 Fair Fair Low dawn redwood (Metasequoia glyptostoboides) 139 8 35 20 Fair Poor Low coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 140 18 55 40 Fair Good Low coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 141 36 65 65 Fair Fair High coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 142 17 45 40 Fair Poor High coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 143 22 55 45 Fair Fair Low *deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara) 144 30 75 45 Good Good Low *deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara) 145 24 75 45 Good Good Low *deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara) 146 30 75 45 Good Good Low Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com 15235 Bellacourt Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection August 11, 2017 *coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 147 44 75 65 Fair Good Low *coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 148 14 35 35 Good Good Low coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 149 8 25 25 Poor Poor Low coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 150 22 55 55 Good Good Low coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 151 20 45 45 Good Good Low coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 152 10, 8 45 45 Fair Fair Low coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 153 11 45 35 Good Good Low coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 154 9 35 30 Good Good Low *coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 155 8 35 30 Good Good Low coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 156 14, 12 45 45 Good Good Low *coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 157 18, 18 45 45 Good Good Low coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 158 14, 14 45 45 Fair Fair Low English walnut (Juglans regia) 159 10 25 25 Fair Poor Low *coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 160 24 55 50 Good Good Low *coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 161 12, 12 55 45 Good Good Low bay laurel (Umbellularia californica) 162 19 45 45 Poor Poor Moderate *coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 163 30 55 55 Good Good Low avocado (Persea americana) 164 20 45 45 Fair Poor Moderate Species Number Trunk Diameter (in.) Height (ft.) Canopy Diameter (ft.) Condition Suitability Impact Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com 15235 Bellacourt Avenue Tree Inventory, Assessment, and Protection August 11, 2017 deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara) 165 42 85 60 Fair Fair High bay laurel (Umbellularia californica) 166 10, 9, 15 55 55 Poor Poor Moderate toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) 167 6, 6, 6, 6, 8 35 35 Poor Poor Low valley oak (Quercus lobata) 168 10 45 30 Fair Fair Low bay laurel (Umbellularia californica) 169 6, 6, 6, 6 35 30 Poor Poor Low coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 170 22 55 45 Fair Good Low coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) 171 22 55 45 Good Good Low Species Number Trunk Diameter (in.) Height (ft.) Canopy Diameter (ft.) Condition Suitability Impact Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - rick@monarcharborist.com 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131