HomeMy WebLinkAboutAT&T AppealCity Council Meeting
AT&T Cell Facility Appeal
September 5, 2018
Vicinity Map
PDR18-0008
PDR18-0011
PDR18-0016
PDR18-0010
PDR18-0012
PDR18-0009
PDR18-0019PDR18-0017
PDR18-0013
PDR18-0020
PDR18-0018
PDR18-0014
PDR18-0015
Saratoga-Sunnyvale RoadN
Coverage Maps
Existing Coverage
PDR18-0008
PDR18-0011
PDR18-0016
PDR18-0010
PDR18-0012
PDR18-0009
PDR18-0019PDR18-0017
PDR18-0013
PDR18-0020
PDR18-0018
PDR18-0014
PDR18-0015
Saratoga-SunnyvaleRoadN
Coverage Maps
Proposed Coverage
PDR18-0008
PDR18-0011
PDR18-0016
PDR18-0010
PDR18-0012
PDR18-0009
PDR18-0019PDR18-0017
PDR18-0013
PDR18-0020
PDR18-0018
PDR18-0014
PDR18-0015
Saratoga-SunnyvaleRoadN
Elevation
Equipment details
7’ tall extension
24” tall by 16” wide canister antenna
24 ”x 12”
4” x 3”
10” x 9”
20” x17”
17” x 13”
7’ clearance
Design Review Findings
15-44.025
a)That the Wireless Telecommunications Facility is or can be co-located with another Wireless Telecommunications Facility located on a structure or an existing utility pole/tower in the public right-of-way unless the applicant has demonstrated that such location is not technically or operationally feasible.
b)That the Wireless Telecommunications Facility and related structures incorporate architectural treatments and screening to substantially include:
1.Appropriate and innovative stealth design solutions;
2.Techniques to blend with the surrounding environment and predominant background;
3.Colors and materials that are non-reflective;
4.Exterior textures to match the existing support structure or building; and
5.Reasonably compatible height with the existing surrounding environment.
c)That landscaping and fencing provide visual screening of the Wireless Communication Facility's ground-mounted equipment, related structures, and that fencing material is compatible with the image and aesthetics of the surrounding area.
PDR18-0008
PDR18-0011
PDR18-0016
PDR18-0010
PDR18-0012
PDR18-0009
PDR18-0019PDR18-0017
PDR18-0013
PDR18-0020
PDR18-0018
PDR18-0014
PDR18-0015
Saratoga-Sunnyvale RoadN
Appeal
Existing Proposed
Photo simulation
View from Appellant's property
View from front porch View from kitchen
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the
placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service
facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency
emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission’s
regulations concerning such emissions.
(47 USC 332(c)(7)(B)(iv) [also known as Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act])
Design Review Findings
15-44.025
a)That the Wireless Telecommunications Facility is or can be co-located with another Wireless Telecommunications Facility located on a structure or an existing utility pole/tower in the public right-of-way unless the applicant has demonstrated that such location is not technically or operationally feasible.
b)That the Wireless Telecommunications Facility and related structures incorporate architectural treatments and screening to substantially include:
1.Appropriate and innovative stealth design solutions;
2.Techniques to blend with the surrounding environment and predominant background;
3.Colors and materials that are non-reflective;
4.Exterior textures to match the existing support structure or building; and
5.Reasonably compatible height with the existing surrounding environment.
c)That landscaping and fencing provide visual screening of the Wireless Communication Facility's ground-mounted equipment, related structures, and that fencing material is compatible with the image and aesthetics of the surrounding area.
Recommendation
Adopt the Resolution denying the appeal and approving the
cell facility application (PDR18-0011).
Lands of Hunziker
Lands
of
Williams
Lands of
Miller
Lands
of
Luo/Zhu